CC 03-01-04
CUPEIQ1NO
AGENDA
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING
CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - REGULAR MEETING
10300 Torre Avenue, City Hall Council Chamber
Monday, March 1, 2004
5:00 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ROLL CALL
STUDY SESSION - 5:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
1.
Joint study session with the Planning Commission to consider recommendations from the
General Plan Task Force.
RECESS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - 6:45 p.m. in the Council Chambers
ROLL CALL
CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS
POSTPONEMENTS
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter
not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will
prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda.
March I, 2004
Cupertino City Council
Cupertino Redevelopment Agency
Page 2
CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of
the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously.
1.
Approve the minutes from the February 17 City Council meeting.
2.
Adopt resolutions accepting Accounts Payable for February 13 and 20, Resolution Nos.
04-274 and 04-275.
3.
Accept the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for 2002-03.
4.
Approve the Annual Investment policy.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
5.
Consider appeals of Application Nos. U-2003-13, ASA-2003-09, and EA-2003-l8, Lisa
Brooke/Kindercare, to allow the operation of a daycare facility in an existing building
with a maximum occupancy of 148 children and 21 employees at 1515 S. De Anza
Boulevard, APN No. 366-10-127.
6.
Consider request to reconsider Application Nos. Z-2003-03, TM-2003-03, U-2003-05,
EXC-2003-04, EA-2003-ll, Ken Busch! Regis Homes, 21255 Stevens Creek.Boulevard,
APN(s): 326-27-035 (Oaks Shopping Center). (Continued from 2/17/04).
PLANNING APPLICATIONS
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
7.
Approve the Planning Commission work program for 2004.
ORDINANCES
STAFF REPORTS
COUNCIL REPORTS
CLOSED SESSION
8.
Negotiations for purchase, sale, exchange, or lease of real property - Government Code
Section 54956.8 regarding the Blue Pheasant Restaurant.
March I, 2004
Cupertino City Council
Cupertino Redevelopment Agency
Page 3
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to Tuesday, March 2 from 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. for a joint study session with the
Planning Commission to consider recommendations from the General Plan Task Force, Council
Chambers, City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
Canceled for lack of business.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the City of Cupertino will make
reasonable efforts to accommodate persons with qualified disabilities. If you require special
assistance, please contact the city clerk's office at 408-777-3223 at least 48 hours in advance of
the meeting.
CITY OF
CUPEIQ1NO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
FAX (408) 777-3333
Community Development Department
SUMMARY
AGENDA NO. -
AGENDA DATE March 1, 2004
SUMMARY:
Consider recommendations from the General Plan Task Force
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council and Planning Commission:
. Hear presentations from and ask questions of the General Plan Task
Force
. Continue the discussion to March 2, 2004 for public input and Council
direction and endorse the public hearing draft (if possible in one
meeting)
. Continue the discussion to a final study session to endorse the
General Plan public hearing draft (if needed)
BACKGROUND:
The City Council appointed a 72 member General Plan Task Force in July 2003
(see Exhibit q. The purpose of the Task Force was to provide additional
community information on the draft General Plan prior to its release for public
hearings. Task Force members met 12 times between July 9 and October 15; in
addition, they had the opportunity to take a field trip to adjacent communities to
learn about recent developments (see Exhibit I).
The product of the Task Force is a modification of the administrative draft of the
General Plan that was circulated in early 2003 (Exhibit A). Task Force additions
are in red and deletions are shown as strike-throughs. Exhibit E is a comparison
of the existing General Plan, administrative draft and Task Force draft. The City
Council will determine if this draft, or some other version, will be released as the
public hearing draft. Once the City Council has authorized a public hearing
draft, it will be reformatted by the General Plan's graphic designer and released
for public review, along with the Environmental Impact Report (see Exhibit F for
a General Plan process diagram).
P,;nted on Recycled Paper
General Plan Task Force
Page 2
DISCUSSION:
Task Force Process
As described in Exhibit D, the Task Force process consisted of:
Information Gathering: presentations by city and other speakers, field trip to
adjacent communities, written questions and answers (Exhibit H), publications
on current planning issues.
Table Group Discussions: discussion at eight tables on topic issues and eventually
votes on key issues and proposed changes to the General Plan. (See Exhibit G for
reports on Table Group discussions and votes)
Minority Reports: An opportunity was provided for Task Force members to
submit minority reports. One group of 14 people chose to submit a minority
report (Exhibit B).
Task Force Draft: drafting of changes by Task Force volunteers, reflecting earlier
Task Force discussion and votes; final draft voted on by Task Force members
(Exhibit A).
Task Force Draft
Issues and changes for each section of the General Plan will be presented by a
representative from the Task Force, as follows:
Community Form and Housing: Andrea Harris
Circulation: Mark Bums
Environmental Resources: Lisa Giefert
Health and Safety: Frannie Edwards-Winslow
Two additional presentations will be made:
Minority Report: Rod Brown (Exhibit B)
Economic Issues and Task Force Survey (Exhibit J): Roger Costa
Role of Task Force Draft
Staff recommends that the Task Force draft serve as the public hearing draft. The
City Council could amend it if there are policies that the Council chooses not to
circulate" as is" for public discussion. However, even if no changes are made to
the Task Force draft, staff recommends that the major issues raised by the Task
Force be organized as issue alternatives in the public review process. The final,
adopted version of the General Plan, then, would be some version of the Task
Force draft, reflecting any changes proposed during the public hearing process.
Issue Alternatives
The major issues recommendations in the Task Force draft relate to development
potential; mixed-use development; building height, density, design and form;
and below-market-rate housing, as summarized below (also see Task Force Draft
(Exhibit A) and Comparison of General Plan Policies (Exhibit E):
General Plan Task Force
Page 3
Development potential - decrease of residential and hotel potential, increase
of commercial potential.
Mixed use development - reduction or elimination of mixed-use potential.
Building Height, Density, Design and Form - reduction of some building
heights and residential densities, no buildings close to street in Heart of the
City, no lane reduction.
Below Market Rate Housing - delete affordable objectives.
These and possibly other issue alternatives will be presented along with the
public hearing draft proposals, as mentioned previously. Other changes will be
proposed during the public hearing process, reflecting technical changes or new
information identified since the draft was published.
Enclosures:
Exhibit A - Task Force recommendations (Amended Draft General Plan)
Exhibit B - Minority Report
Exhibit C - Task Force Members and Attendance
Exhibit D - General Plan Task Force meetings
Exhibit E - Comparison of Existing General Plan, Administrative Draft and Task
Force Draft policies
Exhibit F - General Plan Process
Exhibit G - Task Force Table Group reports and votes
Exhibit H - Task Force Questions and Answers
Exhibit I - Guided and Self-Guided Tours
Exhibit J - Task Force Survey
Exhibit K - Relevant Articles
Exhibit L - Community Survey Summary
Exhibit M - Community Congress Summary
Prepared by: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner
Submitted by:
A~
David W. Knapp
City Manager
c:s¡ JA-£- ~~. / ~
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
G:planningl pdreportl eel task force presentation
0- Enclosed are the study session materials for the
City Council/Planning Commission meetings to
consider the Task Force General Plan
recommendations.
The dates and times are:
Monday, March 1, 5:00 - 6:30 PM
(Task Force presentations)
Tuesday, March 2, 3:00 - 6:00 PM
(Public testimony, Council direction)
City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, Council Chambers
If you have any questions please contact Ciddy
Wordell at (408) 777-3236 or
cynthiaw@cupertino.org
RECOMMENDED CHANGES
TO
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
-Community Form and Housing-
Section 2
land Use/Community Design
INTRODUCTION
The Land Use/Community Design element is the keystone of the General Plan. It unifies the other
elements of the General Plan by providing an overall policy context. It deals with the central
issues of growth and the quality of the community, and helps define the desired balance among
the social, environmental and economic costs and benefits associated with growth. Most of the
Guiding Principles as described in the Community Vision are manifested in this element. The
arrangement and type of land uses determine community identity and character. They determine
how and where people interact, and how much they enjoy living and working in their community.
The land use element policies will help Cupertino evolve into a more integrated, walk-able,
cohesive community with an identifiable center and well-derIDed edges. The underlying form of
the community is well suited to accomplishing the objectives of enhancing the existing
neighborhoods, while developing a more integrated and vibrant development pattern.
Some ofthe factors that must be included in achieving the desired community character are: the
preservation of its natural setting, maintenance and improvement of its attractive residential
neighborhoods, the creation of lively public places, the provision of quality public services and
facilities, the integration and connection of different land uses, the vitality of business and
manufacturing, and the maintenance of a strong tax base for government and school operations.
PLANNING CONTEXT
Development History
Cupertino was incorporated in 1955 and grew from a lightly settled agricultural community of
2,500 people into a suburban community during Silicon Valley's expansion in subsequent
decades. Cupertino was a desirable place to live because of its attractive natural setting and close
proximity to employment centers and major transportation thoroughfares. Since incorporation,
Cupertino also developed an excellent public education system, quality public parks and facilities,
popular shopping destinations, and an efficient street system. More recently, Cupertino has
introduced compact urban development in the City Center and at Vallco Park and has gained a
reputation for high quality corporate campuses and headquarters buildings.
land Use Pattern
Cupertino's land use pattern is built on a conventional suburban model with predominantly
single-family residential subdivisions and land uses with distinctive commercial and employment
centers areas separated from the surrounding residential areas. The development pattern is
influenced by topography. Starting with the western foothills, the predominant land use is
semi-rural, with steep terrain, larger residential lots and an abundance of native and non-native
vegetation. There are few multi-lane streets and sidewalks are intermittent. From Stevens Creek
to Highway 85, the pattern is more suburban. The residential neighborhoods have a more uniform
pattern. The residential lots are smaller and there is a patchwork of nonresidential sites: schools,
small retail and office centers, and a small industrial park. East of Highway 85 the land use
pattern becomes more urban in character. De Anza College, as well as retail, hotel, office and
industrial buildings, are located along major transportation corridors. While the predominant
housing type remains suburban-style, single family residences, there are an increasing number of
multi-story buildings, including higher density apartments.
Transportation Pattern
The suburban pattern forces most residents and workers to rely on their automobiles for their
daily activities. Cupertino has responded by creating an automobile-based land use and
transportation system. Building sites were designed for the convenience ofthe automobile, with
buildings set back far from the street and ample parking in the front. Streets were widened to
accommodate larger volumes of automobile traffic to the detriment of other fOTInS of
transportation, including public transit, bicycling and walking. This transportation pattern isolates
residents socially from interaction with their neighbors. The City seeks to modify this pattern of
development that isolates residents and impedes the building of a cohesive community. The City
seeks to decrease reliance on private automobiles as the sole means of transportation and increase
opportunities for frequent interactions among its residents, workers and visitors.
Cupertino
COMMUNITY FORM
Communities and neighborhoods must have centers and edges to enhance their distinctive
character. The Community FOTIn Diagram, Figure 2-B, defines distinct planning areas,
transportation and trail corridors, and the edges of the City. The diagram identifies the extent of
the urban edge and where the transitions occur to the suburban and semi-rural development
patterns.
Urban Centers
The Community FOTIn diagram defines the primary employment and activity centers in North De
Anza, City Center and Vallco Park and the retail commercial centers in the Vallco Fashion Mall
and the Crossroads Area. These concentrated areas selectivelv combine higher density residential
uses with commercial uses. Housing built along major boulevards offers opportunities to add a
greater
variety of housing types that have not been historically built in Cupertino. Reserving land for
additional housing will add vitality to these corridors, place the security of "eyes and ears" on the
street, shorten commutes and support existing businesses. These centers will be connected by
lower-intensity, mixed use retail, office and residential developments along Stevens Creek and
South De Anza Boulevards.
GOALA A COHESIVE, CONNECTED COMMUNITY WITH A DISTINCTIVE CENTER
AND AN IDENTIFIABLE EDGE
Policy 2-1: Concentrated Development in Urban Centers
Concentrate development in urban nodes and require tte inclusion of selectively include housing
with office and commercial uses where appropriate in designated centers.
Strategy:
Mixed use. ERcomago Consider mixed-use development in the selectively designated urban'
centers.
Policy 2-2: Connections Between Centers and the Community
Provide strong connections between the employment and commercial centers to the surrounding
community.
Strategies:
2
1. Neighborhood connections. Enhance pedestrian and bicycle connections to surrounding
neighborhoods in new development.
2. Public access. Provide pedestrian and bicycle paths through new projects to enhance public
access to and through the development.
Community Form
The "Crossroads" shopping district is proposed to be the centerpiece of the urban nodes. It is
located at the historic core of town and consists of specialty shops, grocery stores, convenience
stores, dining establishments and residential uses that form a strong base for a central focal point.
The Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan allows new buildings to be close to the street, with wide
sidewalks to accommodate pedestrians. It calls for on-street parking to buffer pedestrians ITom
traffic impacts, outdoor dining, attractive street furniture, and landmark elements at the Stevens
Creek Boulevard/De Anza Boulevard intersection to create an attractive, walk-able shopping
district.
Policy 2-3: Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan
Create a vibrant, mixcd c.3C shopping village in the Crossroads area, where commercial and
residential uses and roadway design encourage pedestrian activity.
Strategies:
1. Conformance to Plan. Require development along Stevens Creek Boulevard between
approximately Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard to conform to the Crossroads Area
Streetscape Plan.
2. De Anza Boulevard/Stevens Creek Boulevard landmark. Secure landscape
easements ITom properties at the intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek
Boulevard for construction of a future landmark, which may include open space, landscaping and
other design elements at the comers. Reserve a permanent landscape easement as a condition of
development at all four comers of the intersection to allow the construction of a future landmark,
excluding the southeast comer of the Stevens Creek/De Anza Boulevard intersection. Land at the
southeast comer will be an open space area and gathering place. By reshaping the built
environment and the transportation system to fulfill the land use goals and diagram, the City can
begin to attract residents to central, public spaces. The City-centered form of development will
encourage activity, attractive public uses and a pedestrian-friendly environment.
Policy 2-4: Active Spaces
Encourage active, publicly oriented land uses to locate in the urban nodes.
Strategies:
1. Active Commercial Uses. Recruit active commercial uses such as restaurants, cafes,
bookstores, commercial entertainment uses and movie theaters to locate within the Vallco or
Crossroads planning areas.
2. Zoning Incentives. Provide zoning incentives such as greater flexibility on the allowable
floor area ratio and setbacks for these preferred commercial uses.
3. "Sense of Place." In order to create a "sense of place," require development plans to
incorporate elements that are oriented toward pedestrian-scaled outdoor uses along major
boulevards, including parks, plazas, seating areas, outdoor dining and public art.
4. Public Areas. Ensure that public areas are attractive and designed to meet the open space and
recreational needs of surrounding areas.
Neighborhoods
Planning for the unique aspects of neighborhoods and connecting neighborhoods to each other are
important General Plan principles. Neighborhoods are the building blocks of community form.
They should include a defInable edge (e.g., major streets, creeks) and a center, usually comprised
of a neighborhood school or park. The surrounding land uses exist to enhance and support the
3
neighborhoods with services, jobs, schools and shopping. These services should be within
walking distance to decrease reliance on the automobile. At the same time, neighborhoods must
be protected from incompatible development and undesirable traffic impacts.
Policy 2-5: Distinct Neighborhoods
Plan for neighborhoods that have distinctive edges, an identifiable center and safe pedestrian and
bicycle access to surrounding uses.
Policy 2-6: Neighborhood Protection
Protect residential neighborhoods from noise, traffic, light and visually intrusive effects from
more intense developments with adequate buffering setbacks, landscaping, walls, activity,
limitations, site design and other appropriate measures.
Strategy:
Create zoning or specific plans that reduce incompatibilities between new development and
existing residential neighborhoods: daylight planes, minimum setback standards, landscape
screening, acoustical analysis, location and orientation of service areas away from residential uses
and limitations on hours of operation.
Circulation
Community fonn includes the circulation system that connects people internally and externally.
The system shown in Figure 2-B includes roadways, transit corridors and trails. Highway 85
derIDes the edge between the urban areas and the suburban and semi-rural areas. Opportunities
will be pursued to reduce road width and number of lanes on roads that cross from urban to rural
areas. Landscaping will be more infonnal, with trees and shrubs becoming more dominant and
closer to the street. The circulation system will be balanced so that automobile traffic does not
overwhelm other fonns oftransportation.
Policy 2-7: Defined and Balanced Circulation System
Define the circulation system as a hierarchy of street widths from urban to rural areas. Balance
the roadway system between automobile and pedestrian/bicycle needs.
City Gateways
Gateways are important in creating a memorable impression of a city, often using fonnal
elements, such as buildings, arches, fountains, banners, signage, special lighting, landscaping and
public art. Gateways may also be dramatic without constructed devices, and are not always found
at the city limits. For example, the street over-crossing at Lawrence Expressway and Stevens
Creek Boulevard is a definite gateway to the east edge of Cupertino, even though it is not located
in Cupertino.
Policy 2-8: Distinctive Community Gateways
Provide distinctive community gateways at major entry points that create a unique community
identify for Cupertino.
Strategies:
1. Gateway Plan. Develop a gateway plan for the City's entry points. Identify locations and
design guidelines for the gateway features.
2. Landscaping Treatment. Accentuate the edges with landscaping and road patterns that
announce entry into a different space.
3. New Development. Review properties next to community entry points when they are
developed or redeveloped for opportunities to reflect the gateway concept.
Urban Service Area
The City must focus its resources and energies on places where its residents already live, work,
shop and play. The City desires to grow for the next 20 years within its existing urban service
area. The City's long-tenn growth boundary defines the area where the City intends to expand its
4
services over the next 20 to 30 years. Thus the CUITent urban service area boundary is
coterminous with the City's long-tenD growth boundary. This does not preclude opportunities for
the City to adjust its boundaries with adjacent cities where it is desirable to create logical
community fonD. For the year 2020 time frame, the amount of land in Cupertino will remain
essentially the same except for additions resulting from the annexation of small, unincorporated
islands and potential boundary realignments with abutting cities in valley floor locations.
GOALB A COMPACT COMMUNITY BOUNDARY THAT ALLOWS EFFICIENT
DELIVERY OF MUNICIPAL SERVICES
Policy 2-9: Long Term Growth Boundary
Allow modification of the long-tenD growth boundary only in conjunction with a comprehensive
review of the city's General Plan.
Policy 2-10: Urban Areas
Focus City resources in urbanized areas where the City has previously agreed to provide services.
Policy 2-11: Urban Service Area Expansion
Work with Los Altos, San Jose and Sunnyvale, as appropriate, to create boundaries that derIDe
logical municipal service areas.
Strategy
Tax-Sharing Agreements. Consider entering into tax-sharing agreements with adjacent
jurisdictions in order to facilitate desired boundary realignments.
Policy 2-12: Annexation of Small, Unincorporated Islands
Actively pursue the annexation of unincorporated islands within the City's urban service area,
including the Monta Vista and Creston neighborhoods and other remaining small, unincorporated
islands.
COMMUNITY DESIGN
The previous Community Fonn section of this Element outlines the urban design strategy for the
City. The following section provides more specific direction to implement the community's
design themes. Past planning encouraged development of attractive but separate uses that
discourage interaction. As the city matures, design policies promote buildings and spaces that
invite people into the public realm, stitch different parts of the community together, and instill a
sense of civic identity.
Building Form
Development must convey a community image of well-designed buildings and active public
spaces. The size, color, material and design of buildings-and the placement on their sites-result
in a cumulative design statement that shapes the image of the community. Building fonD refers
not only to the mass and bulk of buildings, but the relationship of buildings to each other.
Cupertino's existing building fOnD reflects policies that direct greater intensity to the high activity
areas, provide for plazas and outdoor areas and respect Cupertino's neighbors by reducing
building scale from larger to smaller buildings. City-wide standards and policies are described
below, while specific development standards for different areas in Cupertino are described in the
Community Development section of this element.
GOALC A HIGH SENSE OF IDENTITY AND CONNECTIVITY
Policy 2-13: Urban Building Forms
Concentrate urban building fOnDS in Vallco Park, City Center and Crossroads/Heart of the City
planning areas.
Strategies:
1. Maximum Building Heights and Setback Ratios. The maximum height and setback
ratios for new buildings in various planning areas are specified in Figure 2-D. Cupertino's taller
5
buildings are allowed in the commercial, office and industrial nodes. The height at the edges of
these nodes is reduced when adjacent to residential or other low-intensity uses. Setback ratios are
established to assure that the desired relationship of buildings to the street is achieved. Exceptions
to the height limitations in the Hcart of the Cit) Specific Plan area may be considered.
Heights ma) exeecd 60 feet fer the Cate.\ ae) areas if deteffllincd through the use permit process
thatthc greater height enhances eit) ideatit) and does net aegati, el) affect residential areas.
2. Multiple-Story Buildings and Residential Districts. Allow construction of multiple-
story buildings in Vallco Park, North De Anza Boulevard, City Center, Crossroads and the Heart
of the City if it is found that nearby residential districts will not suffer from privacy intrusion or
be overwhelmed by the scale of a building or group ofbuildings.
3. Cohesiveness of Buildings. Ensure that the scale and interrelationships of new and old
development buildings complement each other. If the project has many buildings, they should be
grouped to create a feeling of spatial unity.
4. Changes in Building Scale. Avoid abrupt changes in building scale. A gradual transition
between low-rise to mid-rise buildings should be achieved by using the low-rise buildings at the
edge of the project site. Consider the relationship of building seale on both sides of a street.
Setback Ratios
Maintain the primary building bulk below a 1:1 slope lined........ lrom the arterial
street curb line or lines except for the Crossroads and Vallco areas.
For the Crossroads area. see the Crossroads Streels<:ape Plan.
For the Vallco area:
For buildings up to 60 leet ín h~ maintain the prima<y buikflng bulk below a
1.5:1 slope line drawn from the Stevens Creek Blvd.. Homestead Road and Tantau
Avenue curb lines and below 1: 1 slope line d........ fromWolfe Road curb line.
For buildings over 60 feet in heigIt, maintain the primary 00iIdng bulk below a
2:1 slope Ifne (I.e.. 2 feet of_tor every 1 foot of building heightJ drawn from
the Stevens Creek Blvd" Homestead Road and T antau ^"""ue curb lines and below
a 1.5:1 slope Ifne drawn fromWoIfe Road cum line.
Maximum Building Heights
Figure 2-D. Maximum Building Heights.
Amend Figure 2-D as herein stated bv section.
Building and Site Design
Cupertino has long-standing policies that reflect an interest in high-quality and interesting
building design. While the City' has a mix of architectural styles, certain areas, such as Monta
Vista and the Heart of the City, have distinct design guidelines. More recently, as interest has
increased in creating pedestrian friendly environments, building styles are encouraged that frame
the street and are inviting to the surrounding area. An over-riding concern is the visual context
of the proposed buildings, which should not overwhelm neighboring buildings.
Policy 2-14: Attractive Building and Site Design
Emphasize attractive building and site design during the development review process by giving
careful attention to building scale, mass and placement, architecture, materials, landscaping,
screening of equipment and loading areas, and related design considerations.
Strategies:
1. Sensitive Design and Site
Planning. Encourage sensitive design and site planning that avoids monotonous and
6
monolithic buildings through the City's development review process. Design and site planning
techniques should include articulation and segmentation of the wall and roof planes, pedestrian-
scaled building details, visual openings in the wall plane, smaller building footprints, appropriate
building and story setbacks and hierarchical landscaping.
2. High Quality Architecture and Materials. Set high standards for architectural quality by
requiring use of natural materials, particularly as accents, and authentic architectural detailing,
such as real balconies and window trim.
3. Parking Placement in New Development. Place parking out of sight, behind or
underneath buildings. Review the design of the below-level parking facilities with the City's
police agency to minimize crime potential.
4. Development Review. In the City's development review process for major projects, require
computer simulated modeling and photo montage of development proposals and architectural
review by City staff or a consulting architect.
5. Design Guidelines. Utilize existing design guidelines, such as Heart of the City and Monta
Vista, in reviewing development projects. Update the guidelines or create guidelines for dditional
areas if needed to achieve a cohesive design concept. Cupertino's residential stock is largely
single family; 70% in the year 2000. Even so, the number of multi-family units increased by over
1,500 units between 1990 and 2000, with three notable new apartment complexes comprising
most of those units. Seventy-five percent of the residential units allowed under build-out of the
General Plan are multi-family, due to the emphasis on infill, mixed-use development. Clearly
attractive multi-family design is critical to maintaining a high-quality living environment.
6. View Preservation. Devise and implement a policy to encourage deyelopers to limit building
heights in order to preserve hillside views throughout the City.
Policy 2.15: Mufti-Family Residential Design
Maintain a superior living environment for multi-family dwellings.
Strategies:
1. Relationship to Street. Relate building entrances to the street, utilizing porches or stoops.
2. Provision of Outdoor Areas. Provide outdoor areas, both passive and active, and generous
landscaping to enhance the surroundings for multifamily residents. Allow public access to the
common outdoor areas whenever possible. The approach to single family residential design has
evolved in recent years from quantitative control of floor area ratio and setback regulations to
qualitative control over design, including hearings before the Design Review Committee.
Design regulations and guidelines are in place that require design review of larger, two-story
residences; applicants must demonstrate that their proposals blend well into the neighborhood.
Numerous requirements for reducing second story wall heights and breaking up wall planes are
included, as well. The distinct architectura1 design of one neighborhood, Fairgrove, is recognized
for its unique Eichler architecture; special development regulations and guidelines were adopted
for this neighborhood. Several other neighborhoods have chosen to protect their single story
styles by requiring use pennits if second stories are desired. Additional improvements to single
family residential design control may be needed to further enhance neighborhood compatibility
and quality, such as reducing the visual impact of garages.
Policy 2-16: Single-Family Residential Design
Preserve the character of residential neighborhoods by requiring new development to be
compatible with the existing neighborhood.
Strategies:
I. Design Regulations and Guidelines. Ensure that design regulations and guidelines
address the size, style, materials of new construction and the relationship of the proposed changes
to the existing neighborhood, including privacy impacts. Consider amendments to the regulations
and guidelines if additional measures are needed to ensure attractive and compatible designs.
2. Design Review Committee. Maintain the Design Review Committee to review larger
proposed homes and homes requiring exceptions to the regulations.
7
Streetscape and Transitions
Cupertino's streets heavily influence the City's form and the lifestyles of people who live here.
Streets can form neighborhood boundaries and add to the sense of community, but they can also
compartmentalize and cut off other areas, causing isolation. Streets become barriers when they
are difficult to cross or do not offer a sense of protection from vehicular traffic, thus closing off
one neighborhood from another. According to studies, speed, even more than the volume of
traffic, greatly influences the activities of people who live nearby. To help create streetscapes that
promote the General Plan themes of connectivity and walkability, streets must be landscaped and
framed with buildings to provide beauty and interest.
Policy 2-17: Streetscape Design
Consider unique streetscape choices for different parts of Cupertino.
Strategies:
1. Street-oriented Building Design. Orient commercial buildings to the street by placing
them toward the front of properties. Orient residential buildings to the street by providing entries
and stoops fronting the street.
2. Sidewalk Locations and Widths. Determine appropriate sidewalk locations and widths. In
the Crossroads area, sidewalks should be located next to the curb, and should be wide enough to
accommodate a concentration of pedestrians. In the neighborhoods, sidewalks should be
separated by a landscape strip from the curb, in most cases, and be of standard width.
3. Medians. Enhance major streets with landscaped medians to beautifY the streets and serve as
traffic calming devices.
4. Street Trees. Maximize tree landscaping along arterial street frontages between buildings
and/or parking lots and their adjacent street curb lines consistent with land use visibility
requirements.
5. Intersection Landscaping. Provide substantial landscaping at all arterial intersection
comers.
6. Neighborhood Trees. Develop uniform tree planting selections for neighborhoods.
Policy 2-18: Context of Streetscape Landscaping
In public and private landscaping projects subject to City review, select landscaping designs that
reflect the development context.
Strategies:
I. Urban Landscape. Landscape urbanized areas with formal arrangements of ornamental
plants.
2. Rural Landscape. Provide a transition to a more rural landscape on Homestead Road west
of Highway 85, Stevens Creek Boulevard west of Highway 85 and De Anza Boulevard south of
Highway 85. Landscape rural and semi-rural areas informally with native plantings.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
The Community Form section of the Land Use Element and Figure 2-B described the overall
physical structure of Cupertino. The Community Development section describes how growth
potential is allocated to different areas ofthe City, in terms of square footage and height. The type
of development, that is, commercial, office, etc., and other design requirements, are also
described. How the City allocates growth through the General Plan is critical in determining the
type of community Cupertino will be in the future. New housing, retail, office and industrial
growth directed by the City to specific areas with specific intensities can contribute to building a
more balanced and satisfYing community for its residents.
Balancing Land Uses
Cupertino historically has more jobs than housing. When this imbalance is multiplied many fold
by adjacent cities, there are regional consequences that include high local housing costs,
residential sprawl into outlying areas, congestion of the transportation system and increased air
8
pollution. The General Plan's development allocation policies will improve thejobs/housing
balance by increasing potential housing units and decreasing non-residential square footage.
GOAL D THRIVING, BALANCED COMMUNITY
Policy 2-19: Jobs/Housing Balance
Strive for a more balanced ratio of jobs and housing units.
Strategies:
1. Housing and Mixed Use. Allocate housing or mixed-use development on certain
commercial, office and industrial sites that Els Ret ha. c suffieieRt de. 8lspmeRt peteRtial to
reEle.818p as salel) Ron rcsidcRtialpfÐj8ets. consistent with long-tenn Citv revenue projections
(See Policv 2-x Economic Development). .
2. Housing Impact Requirement. Since the qualitv of Cupertino schools (elementary and
high school) is a primary asset of the City. care shall be taken to ensure any new housing will not
adverselv impact these systems.Rcquire tl,at Rlojar. Re.. office or indu3tlial de. elal'ment, or
rcde .clal'n.ent of n,ajar, e.<Ì3Üag office ar lndu3trial de. elal"ments, iRelude housing at a ratio of
t..a d..elling units for C.Cl") 1,000 squarc feet ofnc.. office or industrial Building area.
Encourage all RC" officc find inffilstrial de.elOl'meRt to build teusing at tti3 samc rotie.
Allocating Development Potential
Development activity should be controlled so that private development fulfills City goals and
priorities. There is a finite amount of new development that can take place before traffic levels
exceed the City's desired transportation level of service. Full "build-aut" is not an urgent goal.
The uncommitted development potential from properties that are not "built-out" should be
aHeeated-reserved to meet future City development needs and overall goals. On a case-by-case
basis, the City may allocate development potential to private developments based on the
community benefits the project would provide. The remaining uncommitted development
potential will be allocated as shown in the Development Allocation Table. Further adjustments to
these allocations may be necessary to ensure that the City's economic needs and goals are met.
Citywide development potential is calculated by summing the development potential from each of
the City's areas. Each area has unique development concepts applied to it to det=ine its
potential. Individual properties are assigned base development potential, but most property
owners will need to apply for additional allocations to develop their properties.
Policy 2-20: Diversity of Land Use
Maintain a city structure of Neighborhoods, Commercial areas, Employment areas and
Education/Cultural areas. Provide sufficient development opportunities for these areas in order to
enhance their distinct character and functions, while maintaining the desired transportation levels
of service.
Strategies:
1. Citywide Development Allocation. Allocate new development citywide in accordance
with the following Table I and 2-A Development Allocation.
2. Development Criteria. Floor area ratios for non-residential uses may be exceeded through
the development review process using established criteria for evaluating projects. Floor area
potential not fully utilized in new development will be returned to the relevant development
allocation category.
3. Flexible Allocations. Allow flexibility among the allocations assigned to each geographical
area. Allocations may be redistributed from one geographical area to another if necessary and if
no significant environmental impacts, particularly traffic, are identified.
4. Allocation Review. Review allocations of the development priorities periodically to ensure
that the development priorities meet City needs and goals.
9
5. Development Agreements. Unused development potential committed in development
agreements may be reallocated following the expiration of each development agreement after
public hearing.
TABLE I - DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
1990 2000 Existing DRAFT Task Force
Built Built Gen. Plan Gen. Plan Gen. P1an
Commercial sa ft 3,359,000 3,317,426 4,431,000 4,174,136 4,431,000
Office/Industrial so ft 7,457,000 8,325,312 9,428,000 9,320.005 9,320,005 I
Hotel Rooms 277 411 1,027 l,578 1,429*
Residentia1 Units 17,460 20,032 22.369 24.647 22,369
Monta Vista
Oak Valley
Fairgrove
Other Areas
Commercial Centers
Heart of City 1,182,456
Valleo South 1,110,700
Homestead Rd 238,735
Other Areas 494,576
Employment Centers
NDeAnzaBlvd. 44,979 51,372 2,048,021
City Center 29,358 79,011 1,032,072
Valleo North 127,806 133,147 2,843,144
Bubb Road 28,645
Citywide 3,317,426 4.174,136 8.325,312
(Adjust to densities stated herein.)
[Note: There was strong task force support for reducing the growth in residential dwelling units
to approximatelv 2.300 dwelling units. and prohibiting mixed-use at the Crossroads. There are
two proposed approaches for doing this. The task force voting was split 55/45 in favor of
eliminating mixed-use development in Valko North and South. The approach for eliminating all
residential growth in the Valko areas plus the Crossroads. and reductions in Homestead are
reflected in the policv changes here under Commercial Centers in Section 2 of the GP. The
second approach of onlv eliminating mixed-use growth in the Crossroads and simplv limiting
mixed-use growth elsewhere is reflected under Housing in Section 3-Irnplementatiol1 Program 1.1
].476,115
1,645,700
193,678
495,415
510,531 521,987
708,057 1,09],824
69,550 69,550
268.735 250,604
484
6
&5'7- 500
100- Q
1-;+í>9 800
345
I
srI
PAC¡ E.S
lOA .8
FilA
ð,.,-,. AI S
~...~
*those in the pipeline p1us the Valko potential
Table 2-A. Development Allocation.
Neighborhood Commercial (sq. ft.) Office (sq. ft.) Hotel (rooms)
2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Bundaut
88,8]6 99,698 416,557 456,210
Residential (DU)
2000 Buill Bulldoul
760 902
178 178
220 220
17,376 18.307
126
77
713
126
238
2,266,206
1,149.513
3,069,676
444,435
9,320,005
315
123
224
315
219
551
300
714
&\4- Q
81
~22347
441
1.578
20,032
Neighborhoods and Non-Residential Centers
NEIGHBORHOODS
Many of Cupertino's residential neighborhoods are distinct enclaves, such as Garden Gate, Linda
Vista, Monta Vista, Rancho Rinconada and Oak Valley. Factors that contribute to their distinct
character are architectural style, density or street boundaries. These and all neighborhoods must
be planned carefully to be sure that residents live safely and comfortably, that they have access to
shopping and recreation and that their property investment is reasonably protected. Neighborhood
planning is affected by different neighborhood characteristics. Multi-family or mixed-use
neighborhoods may have easy access to shopping and transit; single-family neighborhoods may
be more isolated from services. Homes in most neighborhoods have suburban, one-and two-story
architectural styles, while others have chosen to retain a single-story appearance or unique
10
A B B1 C C1
AREA 2000 BUILT # of additional nnits OPTION 1 # of additional units OPTION 2
over 2000 built 'A+B) over 2000 built (A+C)
Nei!!hborhood
Monta Vista 760 142 902 142 902
Oak Vallev 178 178 178
Fairgrove 220 220 220
Other areas 17,376 116 17,492 380 17,756
Commercial
Heart of the City 238 443 681 262 500
Val1co South 125 125
Homestead 484 493 977 316 800
Other areas 6 6 339 345
Emnlovment
N. De Anza 215 215 300 300
City Center 219 494 713 495 714
Val1co North 551 228 779 551
Bubb Road 81 81 81 81
CitYWide 20,032 2,337 22,369 2,315 22,347
G:\PlanninglCiddylTable lO-28-03.doc
~
.~
~
Q:
Implementation 1: Housing Units by planning district
Add about 2,340 new residential units as specified in the existing general plan
versus 4r615 new units citywide in the draft.
Option 1 (includes some housing at Vallco, but none in the Crossroads area)
Area # of Units Densitv (# units/acre) # of acres
Monta Vista 142 UP to 12 11.8
Valko Park South 125 Up to 25 5 (of 20)
Heart of the City 443 Up to 25 17.7
Homestead Road 493 Up to 35 14.1
citY Center 494 Up to 35 14.1
North De Anza 215 Up to 25 8.6
Valko Park North 228 Up to 25 8.7
Bubb Road 81 UP to 20 4.1
Undesignated 116 Up to 20 6.5
Total 2,337
Option 2 (includes no housing at Valko, and no housing in the Crossroads
area)
Area # of Units Density (# units/ acre) .;} of acres
Monta Vista 142 UP to 12 11.8
Valko Park South 0 0 0 (of 20)
Heart of the City 262 Up to 15 17.7
Homestead Road 316 UP to 22 14.1
citY Center 495 Up to 35 14.1
North De Anza 300 UP to 35 8.6
Valko Park North 0 0 0 (of 8.7)
Bubb Road 81 UP to 20 4.1
Undesignated 719 ? ?
Total 2,315
G: \ Planning \ Ciddy \ Implementation I.doc
P.
108
architectural features. Plamilng for neighborhoods should consider proximity and connections to
necessary services, and setting design standards for private property and public rights of way that
reflect the character of the surrounding area. Neighborhoods must offer housing opportunities to
meet a spectrum of lifestyle needs. Cupertino encourages a variety of housing types, as
demonstrated in the housing element of the General Plan. Mixed residential and commercial uses
are especially encouraged, since they provide more affordable housing and offer residents easy
access to shopping and work. Ample housing must be available to Cupertino employees to assure
that housing prices and locations are within reach. While several neighborhoods have plamilng
procedures in place, others require identification of and plamilng for special needs.
Policy 2-21: Unique Neighborhood Character
Identify neighborhoods that have an architectural style, historical background or location that
contribute to a unique neighborhood, and develop plans that preserve and enhance their unique
qualities.
Strategies:
I. Neighborhood Plans. Initiate or respond to requests to create Council approval for any
budgeting needed to prepare the plans.
2. Neighborhood Zoning. Respond to requests from neighborhood groups to develop zoning
regulations to address their interest in preserving neighborhood character, such as single story
homes or distinctive architecture.
Policy 2-22: Neighborhood Street Planning
that help create neighborhood identity, improve safety, increase opportunities for social
interaction and connections to shopping, schools, recreation and other destinations.
Strategies:
I. Circulation Patterns. Evaluate neighborhood circulation patterns and eliminate pedestrian
barriers.
2. Public Facilities. Evaluate existing and planned public facilities, such as schools and parks,
to improve pedestrian access.
3. Street Trees. Develop uniform street tree planting plans for each neighborhood.
4. Neighborhood Entries. DefIDe neighborhood entries through architecture, landscaping or
land forms appropriate to the fonnal or rural character of the neighborhood. Vehicular electronic
gates should generally be discouraged, because they isolate developments from the community.
4. Street Requirements. Determine if special street widths, sidewalk requirements or light
fixtures are desirable for any neighborhoods.
Policy 2-23: Compatibility of Lot Sizes
Ensure that zoning, subdivision and lot line adjustment requests related to lot size or lot design
consider the need to preserve neighborhood lot patterns.
Strategies:
1. Minimum Lot Size. Increase the minimum lot size if the proposed new lot size is smaller
than and not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.
2. Flag Lots. Create flag lots in proposed subdivisions when they are the only reasonable
alternative that integrates with the lot pattern in the neighborhood.
MaNTA VISTA
Three neighborhoods have special plans in place. The flrst is the Monta Vista neighborhood,
serving since the late 1800's as an attractive farming, and second home community, and emerging
into Cupertino's primary neighborhood of historical interest. It consists of both commercial and
residential uses. Monta Vista's commercial area is governed by the Monta Vista Design
Guidelines. The Guidelines provide a cohesive approach to architecture, landscaping and public
improvements for that portion of the Monta Vista area. Additional planning is proposed to update
the Guidelines and address the whole area.
Policy 2-24: Manta Vista
11
Retain and enhance Monta Vista as a residential, commercial and industrial node, with adequate
pedestrian and bicycle access. Thecommercial district should serve as a neighborhood
commercial center for Monta Vista and its adjoining neighborhoods. Mixed-use with residential
is encouraged. The industrial area should be retained to provide small-scale light industrial and
service industrial opportunities, while remaining compatible with the surrounding residential and
commercial uses.
Strategies
1. Interconnected Access. Individual properties shall have interconnected pedestrian and
vehicle access and shared parking.
2. Parking. Commercial properties or commercial portions of properties may rely on public
parking on Pasadena and Imperial Avenues to meet their off-street parking needs within the area
bounded by Granada Avenue, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Orange Avenue and the Union Pacific
right of way (see figure below).
3. Storefront Appearance. Commercial and office buildings shall include a storefront
appearance to the public street, and shall not be separated from the public sidewalk by extensive
landscaping or changes in elevation. Office building buildings shall be designed to accommodate
future entrances from the sidewalk for future retail uses.
4. Residential Streets. Residential street improvements shall maintain a semi-rural
appearance, except that Safe Routes to School streets, or any others so designated by the City
Council, shall have sidewalks.
5. Development Intensity. Utilize a 0.15 Floor Area Ratio for non-residential uses. Fleef-t¡re¡¡
ratios ma) be e;¡eecdeci dlilihg the cie.elo]3mcRt re,ie.. preeess ifffiixeci lise or other cemmUl,ity
ameRitics are ]3ro . ¡cicci. Dc. elopmeRt alleeatiOfls fer thc ]3lanniRg area shall wt be exeeedcd
unlcss allocations are t1 aRsfclTeci frob} BRothcr area. Residefilial dcRsities are she.. n OR tte laRd
~Mixed-use areas without specified residential densities require a residential allocation.
Commercial (sq. ft.) Office (sq. ft.) Hotel (rooms) Residential (OU)
2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Bulldout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout
Monta Vista 88,816 99,698 416,557 456,210 - - 760 902
6. Building Heights. Two-story buildings with some three-story elements.
7. Monta Vista Design Guidelines. Evaluate the Monta Vista Design Guidelines to
determine if revisions are needed to the architectural and circulation specifications.
OAK VALLEY
The Oak Valley neighborhood was developed in the late 1990's as a single family neighborhood
in a natural area. It is nearly surrounded by Santa Clara County Park and Midpeninsula Regional
Open Space lands. The 178 homes are clustered on 67 acres of the property, and public parkland
is designated on 145 acres. Development was directed away from steep slopes, view sheds,
riparian corridors and areas of tree cover. Architectural styles were approved that complement the
natural setting.
Policy 2-25: Oak Valley
Retain and enhance Oak Valley as a unique neighborhood surrounded by natural hillside areas
and private and public open space.
Strategies
1. Development Intensity. Development intensity is governed by a development agreement
that includes the use permit and other approvals. These approvals describe development areas,
intensity and styles of development, public park dedication, tree protection, access and historic
preservation. The theme ofthe approvals is to balance development with environmental
protection by clustering development. setting it back from sensitive environmental areas and
preserving large areas in permanent open space.
2. Architectural Design. Residences are required to reflect traditional architectural styles and
use of natural materials.
Commercial (sq. ft.) Office (sq. ft.) Hotel (rooms) Residential (OU)
12
2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout
Oak Valley - - -- - - 178 178
FAIRGROVE
The Fairgrove neighborhood is located in ea8tern Cupertino, and consists of a group
of220 EicWer homes built in the early 1960's. The area has maintained a consistent Eichler
architectural style. In collaboration with the Fairgrove neighborhood, the Rl-e - Single
Family EicWer zoning was adopted. The zoning includes regulations that govern
setbacks, roof slope, materials and other unique EicWer features. EicWer Design Guidelines were
also adopted, which property owners use voluntarily to preserve the Eichler style while
remodeling their homes.
Policy 2-26: Fairgrove
Preserve the unique character of the Eichler homes in the Fairgrove neighborhood.
Strategies
1. Zoning. Require all new construction to confonn to the Rle zoning (EicWer Development
Regulations)
2. Design Guidelines. Encourage residents to incorporate the design guidelines illustrated in
the EicWer Design Guidelines prepared for the Fairgrove neighborhood.
Commercial (sq.
ft.)
Office (sq. ft.) Hotel (rooms) Residential (DU)
2000
Built
Buildout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Bulldout 2000 Built Buildout
Fairgrove - - - . - - 220 220
OTHER AREAS
The remaining neighborhoods are areas that are not planned as unique neighborhoods at this time
and are not mixed-use zoning areas. Development intensity is detennined by existing zoning and
land use designations.
Commercial (sq.
ft.)
Office (sq. ft.) Hotel (rooms) Residential (DU)
2000
Built
Bulldout 2000 Built Bulldout 2000 Built Bulldout 2000 Built Bulldout
Other Areas - -- -- 17,376 18,307
COMMERCIAL CENTERS
Commercial areas in the City offer a variety of goods and services directly to residents in the
neighborhoods or the larger region. Vallco Park and the Crossroads Area are the primary,
concentrated commercial areas. General Plan allocations for other commercial nodes are for
local-serving commercial needs. Commercial/residential mixed-use is encouraged in all
commercial nodes.
HEART OF THE CITY
Policy 2-27: Heart of the City
Create a positive and memorable image along Stevens Creek Boulevard of mixed use
development, enhanced activity nodes, and safe and efficient circulation and access for all modes
of transportation.
Development Activities:
A majority of the commercial development allocation should be devoted to enhancing activity in
the major activity centers. Mixed commercial and residential development may be allowed when
they provide community amenities and are pedestrian-oriented. Land uses between the activity
13
centers should help focus and support activity in the centers. See Policy 2-29 for development
activities in these areas.
Development Intensity:
Below is the development allocation for the entire Heart of the City area. See Policies 2-28 and 2-
29 for development intensity in the Heart of the City sub areas.
Heart of the City:
Commercial (sq. ft.)
2000 Built Buildout
1,182,456 1,476.115
Office (sq. ft.) Hotel (rooms) Residential (DU)
2000Built Buildout 2000Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout
510,531 521.987 77 238 &>-1500
Design Elements:
The Heart of the City Specific Plan and Cros3roads i\rea Strectscape Plan shall provide design
standards and guidelines for this area. They promote a cohesive, landscaped ~streetscape
that links the major activity centers. Tte) arc intcndcd to pfDmatc high qualit) tie,elapment, and
enea>i'"ge buildings to be located in relati,d) close proximit) to the street frontage ta increase
,isibility and to frame the street.
Building Heights: See building heights map (Figure 2-D).
Strategies
1. Heart of the City Specific Plan. Revise the Heart of the City Specific Plan to reflect
modified plan-area boundaries, preferred development patterns, land use distribution and height
limits for each sub-area of the Stevens Creek Planning Area.
2. Traffic Calming. Evaluate options for traffic calming on Stevens Creek Boulevard to
improve the pedestrian environment bv proaetivelv managing speed limits. their manual and
automated enforcement. and traffic signal synchrony.
CROSSROADS AREA
Policy 2-28: Crossroads Area
Create an active, pedestrian-oriented shopping district "ith m;,wti >ise along Stevens Creek
Boulevard, between De Anza Boulevard and Stelling Road.
Development Activities:
Development along Stevens Creek Boulevard shall have retail uses with storefronts on the ground
level. Commercial office uses may be allowed on the second level. Residential uses are permitted
on the second or third Ie. el of buildings, ar located at the rear of the proper!). These residential
>ises should aet as a buffcr bet " een the eondRereial components of the shopping district and
adjacent single famil) residences.
Development Intensity:
Floor Area Ratio: 0.15 commercial/commercial office. Floor area ratios Ria) be exceeded d>iring
the de,elopment re,ie" preeess if mixed >ise or other eoffiffiUnit) amenities arc pro ,ided.
De.dopmcnt allocations for the planning area shall not he exceeded >inless allocatians are
transkrred from another area.
Housing dcAsity: 35 d..elling "nits per brass acre.
Design Elements:
B"ildings shall eon"ist of . ertical or horizontal mixed >ise de, elo¡""ents, t.. a to three stories in
height, located on the street facing propert) liI,e", creating a street.. all .. ith distinct store front
modules along Ste. ens Creek Boale. ard and adjaeent streets. Primary ground-floor entrances
shall face the street. Residential ground floor anits shall ha. e front doers and stoops facing p>iblie
and pri, ate streets. Building elements adjacent to existing single famil) fCs:dential c,ses shall be
t.. 0 stories in height. De. clop!i1ents .. ith a 1 esidential cah1ponent sl,all pro iide puhlie opcn
spaee-. The streetscape shall consist of wide pedestrian sidewalks with inviting street furniture,
street trees, pedestrian-scaled lights with banners, small plazas, art/water featnres, en-streeI
~pedestrian crosswalks with special paving, and other elements identified in the
14
Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan. Designs should include entry features at the Stelling
Road/Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anza/Stevens Creek Boulevard intersections to
mark the Crossroads area. A landmark feature shall be provided at City Center Park at the
Stevens Creek and De Anza Boulevard intersection to mark the center of the city.
Building Heights: Sce building hei¡;hts mar (Fi¡;afC 2 D).Maximum of 35 feet.
Strategies:
1. Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan. Prepare a specific plan for Stevens Creek Boulevard
between De Anza Boulevard and Stelling Road, with the objective of creating a unique
streetscape and shopping district. The Crossroads area presents a unique pedestrian-oriented
activity center, which will be a positive and memorable gathering place for Cupertino citizens and
visitors. The plan shall include the following elements:
. A land use plan specifying the type, intensity and arrangement of land uses to promote
pedestrian and business activity.
. A design plan that provides for an attractive pedestrian streetscape.
The design plan shall contain guidelines that foster pedestrian
activity and create a sense of arrival.
2. Shared Parking. Require shared parking agreements throughout the area, with overall
parking standards reduced to reflect shared parking, OR street parkiRg and mixed use neti. itics.
Parking areas may be located below-grade, in above-grade structures or behind the buildings.
Above grade structures shall not be located along street frontages and shall be lined with active
uses on the ground floor.
3. Commercial-office Uses. Allow commercial-office uses above ground level retail to be
drawn from the commercial allocation for the area.
1. Residential Uses. Foells resideRtial de. elorment OR seeond or third Ie. el ofbuildin¡;s or to
the rear of the prope!'!). These residential uses shelild act as a bllffcr bet.. een the eemmereial
components of the Cressroads arca adjaeent to single famil) residences.
STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
Policy 2-29: Stevens Creek Boulevard
Retain and enhance Stevens Creek Boulevard as a mixed commercial, office and residential
corridor connecting De Anza College, Crossroads, City Center and Valko Fashion Mall. This
corridor extends from Highway 85 to the eastern city limits and is split into three segments:
"West," "Central" and "East." The Crossroads Planning Area is between the Western and Central
sections of the Stevens Creek Boulevard Planning Area.
Development Activities:
The Stevens Creek Planning area includes the "Heart of the City" development standards and
guidelines. Residential or office developments shall be considered in mid-block parcels. Parcels
on or near intersections shall have a neighborhood commercial component. Project-specific
development allocations will be detennined on a case-by-case basis.
I. West Stevens Creek Boulevard (from Highway 85 to Anton Way):
This area includes the Oaks Shopping Center and the De Anza Community College campus. New
development in this area should ineorpornte mixed incorporate mixed I
commercial/residentiallresidentia uses.
2. Central Stevens Creek Boulevard (from De Anza Boulevard east to
Perimeter Road): New development shall consist of commercial/commercial office uses on the
first floor. Office uses are pennitted on the second floor. Residential and residential mixed uses
are allowed.
3. East Stevens Creek Boulevard (from Perimeter Road to eastern City limits): New
development shall consist of commercial/commercial offices uses on the flfSt floor. Office uses
are pennitted on the second floor. Residential and residential mixed uses are allowed.
15
Development Intensity:
Floor Area Ratio: 0.15 for commercial/commercial office. Floor area ratios ilia) bc exceeded in
tLc '.Vest and Ccntral Ste ,ens Creek Boule ,arà areas àuring the de,elopment re,ien proeess if
mixed U50 or ether eommuRit) ah,enities are pro ,idcd. De, ele(Jment allocations f{)r the planning
area shall not be cxceeded unless alleeatiom arc tramfcrreà from anothcr area.
Residential: Up to 35 dwelling units per gross acre in City Center to Perimeter Rd. Up to 25 units
per acre elsewhere.
Design Elements:
Buildings shall be located at the front setback line defmed in the Heart of the City Specific Plan.
Parking shall be located to the side or rear of the buildings.
Building Heights: See btlilding heights mal' (Figure 2 D).Maximum 45 feet City Center to
Perimeter Rd. Maximum of 30 feet elsewhere.
VALLCO PARK SOUTH
Policy 2-30: Vallco Park South
Retain and enhance Valleo Park South as a large-scale, mixed uSe commercial area that is a
highly ~regional commercial, office and entertainment center, .. itL supporti,,); higher
donsit) residential de , elopn,entThis area is specifically not intended as a mixed-use center. hut
rather as a hub for future city revenue producing uses (i,e. retail. hotel. commercial).
Development Activities:
1. A regional shopping mall and office and industrial buildings are the main features of
this area. Hotels and hig],cr densit) housing are also allowed in the Vallco Park area.
Daytime and nighttime regional entertainment activities, such as a movie theatre
complex, are highly encouraged in the mall area. As part of the development
agreement, office and industrial uses are also allowed. The precise mix ofland uses
shall be detennined via a master plan and an approved use pennit.
The City has fonned a redevelopment project area encompassing the regional mall properties.
The redevelopment area allows for most of the funds derived from the "tax increment fmancing"
to go to the redevelopment area. "Tax increment" refers to the amount of the property tax value
increase above the property tax value at the time of the redevelopment area approval. +he
expected tm, increment funàs n ill finanee impro, ement5 anà affordable hotlsing in thi3 area.
The regional mall site has a development agreement with the City to allow an additional 535,000
sq. ft. of commercial area above the 1,110,700 sq. ft. of space, which existed on July 1, 1991. The
development agreement expires in 2006. This area can be used as additional ~ I
commercial, office, industrial and/or hotel building space. The development agreement ties many
ofthe mall's future development activities to the regulations and policies in effect at the time of
its adoption. Ne.. offiee dc,elo(Jment east of Wolfe Read must be associateà .. ith nen resiàeRtial I
de, dopment at a ratio of t n 0 ~nits for e. ery 1,000 sqtlarc feet of office s(Jaee.
Development Intensity:
Floor area ratio: 0.15 for office/industrial. Floor area ratios ma) ee exccedeà during the
de ,do(Jn,ent re,ie.. precess ifh,ixed use or other eommunit) amenities are pre ,idod.
De, clopment Blloeatioll5 for the (Jlanning area shall not be e,,"eedcd unless aHocatioll3 are
transfcrred from BRo:hcr area. !Iotd de ,elopmcnt is dmnn from the hotel allocation in this area.
Residential: 35 dnclliBg mJits/gross flore.
Valleo Park South
Commercial (sq. ft.)
2000 Built Buildout
1,110,700 1.645,700
Office (sq. ft.) Hotel (rooms) Residential (OU)
2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout
708,057 1.091,824 713 'IOOJ!
16
Design Elements:
To better integrate the shopping mall with the surrounding community, encourage any new retail
development to provide outdoor shopping experiences in continuity with the present indoor
shopping. New office development should also be pedestrian-oriented. To achieve this, proposed
projects should:
I . Avoid parking structures along the Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage, and minimize the
height and bulk of parking structures visible from public streets.
2. Develop pedestrian linkages between the industrial park and the regional mall.
3. Provide active retail uses facing the street or outdoor pedestrian corridor with connections to
the interior mall area, residences and industrial park.
4 . Design parking areas relatively free of pedestrian barriers and shopping islands.
5. Site buildings to create a strong street presence. Buildings facing the street shall be designed in
consideration of the scale of the buildings across the street.
6 . Reduce heights and increase setbacks for new development proposed adjacent to residential
areas.
7 . Include pedestrian amenities: landscaping, furniture, lighting, fountains, canopies, special
paving materials and other features to enhance pedestrian activity.
8. Retain the trees along the 1-280 frontage, Wolfe Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard as much as
possible when new development is proposed.
Building Heights: See building heights map (Figure 2-D).
HOMESTEAD ROAD
Policy 2-31: Homestead Road
Create an integrated, mixed-use commercial and housing village along Homestead Road,
consisting of three integrated areas. Each area will be master planned, with special attention to
the interconnectivity ofthese areas.
Development Activities:
A commercial area will be located at the southeast corner of Homestead Road and Stelling Road.
Residential uses are encouraged along with the commercial component. A ffigflmedium -density
residential area will be located in the mid-block area between the two commercial areas. The
residential area will include a new public park.
Homestead Road
Commercial (sq. ft.)
2000 Built Buildout
238,735 193,678
Office (sq. ft.) Hotel (rooms)
2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Bulldout
69,550 69,550 126 126
Residential (DU)
2000 Built Buildout
484 +,+m 800
Development Intensity:
Floor Area Ratio: 0.15 commercial/commercial office. Floor area ratios ilia) be exceeàeà àHring
the de. elol"ilient re. ic.. process if mi"eà ase or other eol1lmanit) amenities fife pro. idod.
De. clopilient allocations fOf the plam,ing area shall not be e)[eeeàeà anle", alleeatisn3 are
transferred from a¡,ether area.
Residential: W-up to 35 dwelling units per gross acre.
Design Elements:
Buildings facing the street shall consider the scale of the buildings across the street.
Building Heights: See building heights map (Figure 2 D.) Maximum height of35 feet
Strategy
Develop a conceptual plan for the Homestead Road Planning Area.
REMAINDER OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AREAS .
Policy 2-32: Remainder of Neighborhood Commercial Areas.
17
Retain and enhance neighborhood commercial areas, which provide goods and services to
neighborhood residents and visitors. These areas include:
0 South De Anza Boulevard.
0 West side of Stevens Canyon Road across from McClellan Road.
0 Intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard.
0 Homestead Road near Foothill Boulevard.
0 Northwest corner of Bollinger Road and Blaney Avenue.
0 Southeast corner of Homestead Road and Blaney Avenue.
0 North side of Stevens Creek Boulevard between Highway 85 and Mary Avenue.
0 All other non-residential properties not referenced in an identified commercial area.
Development Activities:
Developments are encouraged to include a neighborhood commercial presence along the street.
Developments may be occupied solely by neighborhood commercial or residential uses, but not
solely by office, commercial-office or general commercial uses. Buildings may be one or two
stories in height, to be determined on a case-by-case basis. Ground-level uses near the street must
be neighborhood commercial uses with a traditional storefront appearance. Second-level areas
may be commercial office or residential. Residential uses should be used as a buffer between
commercial uses and neighboring low-density residential properties. Landscaping may be used as
a buffer in smaller developments.
Development Intensity:
Floor Area Ratio: 0.15 neighborhood commercial.
Residential: Residential density is dependent on the neighborhood context, with a maximum
density of 15 dwelling units per gross acre.
Commercial (sq. ft.) Office (sq. ft.) Hotel (rooms) Residential (OU)
2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout
Other Areas 494,576 495,415268,735250,604 - - 6 345
Strategy
Neighborhood Commercial Zoning. Develop a Neighborhood Commercial Zoning Ordinance that
derIDes the uses and development regulations for this zone. Rezone appropriate areas to this
zoning district.
EMPLOYMENT CENTERS
NORTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD
Policy 2-33: North De Anza Boulevard
Maintain and enhance North De Anza Boulevard as a regional employment
center with supporting commercial and residential land uses.
Development Activities: Office, industrial, research and development with supporting
commercial and residential uses. New office development must be associated with new
residential development at a ratio of two units for every 1,000 sq. ft. of office space.
Development Intensity:
Floor Area Ratio: 0.15 office/industrial. Floor area ¡atios mal be exceedcd d~ring the
de ,elepfficht rc,le" preecss if mixed usc or other eeffimunit) amenities arc pro ,ided.
Dc, elopmcnt al1888110113 for Ihe plannlBg area shall not be exceeded uBles3 allecations are
trm,sfclTcà frem another area.
Residential: :;§.-Up to 25 dwelling units per gross acre.
Commercial (sq. ft.) Office (sq. ft.) Hotel (rooms) Residential (OU)
2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout
North De Anza Blvd. 44,979 51,372 2,048,021 2,266,206 - 123 - 300
Design Elements:
An extensive landscape setback next to De Anza Boulevard is required from Alves Drive to
Route 280. The landscape area shall be complemented by landscaped medians and generous
18
private landscaped areas. The 50-foot landscaped setback may be reduced according to project
frontage size, scale and development type. Driveways and streets onto De Anza Boulevard
shall be discouraged to avoid disrupting the continuity oflandscaping and the flow of traffic.
To strengthen the visual effect of this landscaped corridor, new buildings should be sited to frame
the street and landscaping. Pedestrian features, such as company stores, outdoor seating and front
entries are encouraged.
Building Heights: See building heights n,ajJ (Fig. 2 D).Maximum height 30 feet.
CITY CENTER
Policy 2-34: City Center.
Maintain and enhance City Center as a ffifgemoderate-seale, ftigh-medium density, mixed use I
district "itll a lar,;e daytin,c jJ6jJuiatioh that will provide co=unity identity and activity and will
support retail uses in the Crossroads Area.
Development Activities:
Office, housing, hotel, public facilities, stores, restaurants and mixed uses.
Development Intensity:
Floor Area Ratio: 0.15 co=ercial/co=ercial office/office. Floor area ratios may be exceeded
during the dc. dСJlnent ro. ie" proCC33 if mixed ~3e ar ather eÐmfll~flity amcnitias are jJra. ided.
De. elojJmeflt allocations for the plaMling area 311all not be exceeded unless allocations arc
transfeR'ad flOm another area.
Residential: Up to 35 dwelling units per gross acre.
Commercial (sq. ft.) Office (sq. ft.) Hotel (rooms) Residential (DU)
2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout
City Center 29,35879,011 1,032,072 1,149,513 - 224 219 714
Design Elements:
Buildings are of varied fonn and height. A public park is located at the southeast comer of
Stevens Creek and De Anza Boulevards, combining open space, landscaping, public art and retail
uses that ITont the plaza. It will serve as a focal point for co=unity identity and will include
pedestrian connections to the Crossroads area.
Building Heights: See building heights ma¡¡ (Figure 2 D.)Maximum height of 45 feet. Height
exceptions have been granted to create a high activity node in this area. No further exceptions
shall be granted.
VALLCO PARK NORTH
Policy 2-35: Vallco Park North
Retain Vallco Park North as an employment area of predominately office and light industrial
activities, with neighborhood co=ercial uses. Suppol1ing residential "sas are enca,.raged.
Development Activities:
Hewlett Packard also has a development agreement for its 95-acre campus site bounded by Wolfe
Road, Homestead Road, Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue, which co=its the City to the
development policies of the 1993 adopted General Plan, excluding the policies on additional
mitigated development that were later rescinded. This development agreement expires in 2015.
Residential Futnre potential retail uses are enconraged a potential for ffi this area. Neighborhood
co=ercial, and hotel end re3idential uses are allowed.
Vallco Park North
Commercial (sq. ft.)
2000 Built Buildout
127,806 133,147
Office (sq. ft.) Hotel (rooms) Residential (DU)
2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout
2,843,144 3,069,676 315 315 551 &#~
Development Intensity:
19
Hewlett Packard's development agreement locks in the remaining floor area allocated to their
property. After the expiration of the development agreement, and for other properties in this area,
the floor area ratio is 0.15 for office, industrial and commercial uses. Floor area ratios may be
exceeded during the de , ele Ò!T}eRt re,ie" òwee3S if mixed lise er ether eemmuRit) amenities arc
Òf8, ided. Dc, cla òmeRt alloeatiaRs far the òlaRRiRg area shall Ret be exeeeded ur¡)C33 allecatien3
are transferred tram another area.
Residential: 35 d"clling units òer gross acre.
Design Elements:
Residential USC3 arc cncouraged along the slreet fre"tages te frame the strect.
Building Heights: See building heights map (Figure 2-D)
BUBB ROAD
Policy 2-36 Bubb Road
Retain the Bubb Road area primarily as aft low-rise industrial and research and development area. I
Development Activities:
Allowed uses consist of those described in the West Valley Industrial Park ordinance. In addition,
neighborhood commercial and residential uses are allowed. Compatibility of non-industrial uses
with industrial uses must be considered when reviewing new development.
Development Intensity:
Floor area ratio: 0.15 for industrial and neighborhood commercial. Floer area ratios may be
cxceeded duri"g the de. elopment re. ie" proceS3 if mixed use or ether eemmu"i,) amenities are
pro.ided. Dc.elopmcnt al1oeatiefl3 fer the planning area shall not be exeeedcd ,mless allocations
are tra"sferrcd frem Ðf>8ther aæa.
Residential: '>§-Up to 20 dwelling units per gross acre.
Commercial (sq. ft.) Office (sq. ft.) Hotel (rooms) Residential (DU)
2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout 2000 Built Buildout
Bubb Road - - 428,645 444.435 - - - 81
Design Elements:
Local serving commercial is encouraged along the street trontage to provide services closer to
employment centers and to encourage pedestrian activity.
Building Heights: aG-4&- Maximum of 30 feet
EDUCATION/CUL TURAL CENTER
DE ANZA COLLEGE
Cupertino is home to De Anza College, an outstanding community college with 25,000 students
in 2000. It is a valuable educational resource for students and a cultural resource for residents
who utilize the perfonnance and art activities of the College. De Anza College also provides a
venue for bringing the community together for meetings and citywide celebrations. As De Anza
College grows, opportunities will be sought to further integrate its activities into the community.
A portion of the campus at the intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road is
included in the Crossroads Plan, in hopes that small commercial activities could be located there.
Housing on the De Anza site is encouraged to help meet student/staff housing needs. In addition,
traffic mitigation measures are encouraged to address circulation and levels of service.
Policy 2-37: De Anza College
Support De Anza College in its role as a valuable community resource, and seek opportunities to
integrate future activities into the community.
Development Activities:
Small commercial activities and housing are encouraged in addition to traditional college
functions.
Design Elements:
20
Building locations should minimize visual impacts on surrounding residential neighborhoods.
Commercial activities should be considered along the street front as part of the Crossroads
planning area. Circulation patterns should be designed to direct traffic away from residential
neighborhoods.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Cupertino enjoys a diverse economic environment that includes high technology headquarters and
divisions, start-up companies, regional and local shopping centers and other valuable community
services and stores, such as banks and restaurants. Development policies must take into account
traffic, housing and community character impacts, as well as the economic health of the
community, opportunities to revitalize older retail centers and provide for the growth of the City's
business community. The economic benefits of development to Cupertino, such as sales, user and
hot. el taxes, should also must be considered in development policies to offset Cupertino's low I
p~rcentagc share of local property tax revenues.
GOAL E THRIVING AND DIVERSE BUSINESSES THAT BRING ECONOMIC
VITALITY TO THE COMMUNITY, WHILE BALANCING HOUSING, TRAFFIC
AND COMMUNITY CHARACTER IMPACTS
CITYWIDE
Cupertino has multiple points offreewav access adjoining commercial centers (e.g. Valko North
and South. and The Oaks) capable of supporting regional shopping. entertaimnent. hotels. and
other business-to-business sales activities that can generate revenues for the city without
adverselv impacting local traffic congestion. Development policies shall reflect the long-tern'
economic value of these centers to Cupertino.
Policv 2-38a: Economic Development Plan
Citv staff shall prepare an annual forward-looking I a-year revenue forecast keved to the
commercial zones within the City. This forecast shall include the specific development
assumptions and proactive strategies supporting the forecast for each zone. Land use
decisions affecting these zones shall be made with detailed understanding of their fiscal
impact on the citv's projected long-tenn revenue stream.
Cupertino is interested in working with local companies and businesses to maintain a high quality
community. City officials strive to be responsive to the needs oflocal businesses and seek
opportunities for interaction with them.
Policy 2-38: Partnerships
Encourage the private sector to participate in partnerships with nonprofit or public agencies to
provide community benefits and services.
Policy 2-39: New Businesses and Business Retention
Encourage new businesses and retain existing businesses that provide needed local services and
municipal revenues, contribute to economic vitality and enhance the City's physical environment.
Strategy:
Collaboration with Business Community. Collaborate with the business community to facilitate
growth, development and infrastructure improvements that benefit residents and businesses
through the City's Economic Development Committee and other resources.
Policy-40: Maintain Streamlined Development Review and Building Permit
Processes
Provide efficient and timely review of development proposals, while maintaining quality
standards in accordance with city codes. Look for solutions to problems, be responsive to
21
community concerns, promote positive communications at all levels of review and provide
analysis and advice to decision-makers to help them make informed decisions.
OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
The Valleo Industrial Park, North De Anza Boulevard, City Center and West Valley Industrial
Park employment nodes contain most of Cupertino's officelindustrial development.
Office/industrial areas have evolved into office/research and development, more than industrial.
Apple Computer headquarters and the office/industrial facilities of Hewlett Packard are major
office developments in Cupertino. The two office towers and the mid-rise office buildings at the
intersection of Stevens Creek and De Anza Boulevards, and the smaller companies in the West
Valley Industrial Park on Bubb Road are other significant developments. Office/industrial
development brings prestige and vitality to the City. However, consideration needs to be given to
maximizing economic benefits to Cupertino, as well.
Policy 2-41: Revenue Ana/ysis of Office Developments
In reviewing office development proposals, encourage office uses and activities that generate
significant revenues to the City, such as local sales offices, capturing point of sale internet
transactions and business to business tax revenues.
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Cupertino's most significant commercial center is Valleo Fashion Park. Because of the economic
decline ofthe Valleo Fashion Park, the City initiated a redevelopment project area there in 2000.
Redevelopment funds will be used to foster the revitalization of this regional shopping center
through mall expansion, infrastructure improvements, and economic development programs,-t!flà
pre ,isieR of .CIJ 10", ]0" aRE! moE!erate iRcome lIoclsing. Other significant commercial areas are
along Stevens Creek Boulevard, including the Crossroads area and Monta Vista. While there has
been some façade improvement in recent years, there has been no major reinvestment in the
commercial centers in decades. Reinvestment is needed to upgrade or replace buildings and make
other improvements so that these commercial areas are more competitive and better serve the
community.
Policy 2-42: Val/co Redevelopment Area
Facilitate redeve]opment in the Valleo Redevelopment Area as a distinctive, mixed li3e, regional
shopping and entertainment center, with rcsidcntial fiRd hotel uses.
Strategy
Master Developer. Facilitate development by working with the property owner or a Master
Developer.
Policy 2-43: Incentives for Reinvestment
Provide incentives for reinvestment in the existing commercial areas.
Strategies:
I. Mixed-use. AHew-Consider mixed-use (office, commercial, residential) in certain
commercial areas to provide more community identity, pedestrian activity and housing
opportunities without marginalizing tax-revenue producing businesses.
2. Shared or Reduced Parking. Consider shared parking or reduced parking requirements as
incentives to construct new commercial development without constructing unnecessary amounts
of parking.
3. Streetscape Improvements. Consider streetscape improvements to such areas as the
Crossroads area to encourage redevelopment of the area as a pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use
village and to contribute to housing or community design goals.
HILLSIDES
Cupertino's hillsides are an irreplaceable resource shared by the entire Santa Clara Valley. The
hillsides provide important habitat for wildlife, watershed capacity to prevent flooding of
22
urbanized areas, a wide vegetative belt that cleanses the air of pollutants, recreational
opportunities for residents, and visual relief from sprawling development. Allowing low-intensity
residential development in the foothills provides a realistic use of private hillside lands, while
preserving important environmental, recreational and aesthetic values.
GOAL F HILLSIDE PROTECTION
Policy 2-44: Hillside Development Standards
Establish building and development standards for the hillsides that ensure hillside protection.
Strategies:
I. Ordinance Regulations and Development Approvals. Apply ordinance regulations and
development approvals that limit development on ridgelines, hazardous geological areas and
steep slopes. Control colors and materials, and minimize the illumination of outdoor lighting.
Reduce visible building mass through such means as stepping structures down the hillside,
following the natural contours, and limiting the height and mass ofthe wall plane facing the
valley floor.
2. Slope-density Fonnula. Apply a slope-density fonnula to very low intensity residential
development in the hillsides. Density shall be calculated based on the foothill modified, foothill
modified - acre, and the 5-20 acre slope density fonnulae. Actual lot sizes and development areas
will be detennined through zoning ordinances, clustering and identification of significant natural
features.
Policy 2-45: Previously Designated Very Low Density: Semi-Rural 5-Acre
Allow certain hillside properties to develop using a previous General Plan Designation.
Strategy
Properties Designated in 1976 General Plan. Properties previously designated Very Low-
Density Residential: Semi-RuraI5-Acre Slope Density Fonnula as described in the amendment to
the 1976 General Plan concerning the land use element for the hillside area may be subdivided
utilizing that fonnula. Properties previously subdivided in confonnance with the Very Low-
Density Residential: Semi-RuraI5-Acre Slope Density Fonnula have no further subdivision
potential for residential purposes.
Policy 2-46: Existing Legal Lots in Foothill Modified and Foothill Modified 1/2-
acre Slope Density Designations
Require discretionary review of hillside or RI properties if development is proposed on
substandard parcels, on slopes greater than 30% or on any other areas where studies have
detennined the presence of health and safety problems.
Strategy
Exception Process. Review these development proposals through the exception process.
Policy 2-47: Clustering Development in Subdivisions
Cluster lots in major subdivisions in the 5-20-acre slope density designation, and encourage
clustering in minor subdivisions in the 5-20-acre slope density designation.
Strategy
Reserve 90% of the land in private open space to protect the unique characteristics of the hillsides
from adverse environmental impacts. Keep the open space area contiguous as much as possible.
There will be some scarring from hillside development as roads, housing sites and public and
private subdivision improvements are graded. So, improvement standards must balance the need
to furnish adequate utility and emergency services against the need to protect the hillside,
vegetation and animals. Roads should be ruu:rowed to avoid hanDing trees and streambeds.
Grading should be kept to a minimum by prohibiting mass grading for building sites and by
allowing narrow driveways, instead of public streets, to serve more than one lot.
Policy 2-48: Rural Improvement Standards in Hillside Areas
23
Require rural improvement standards in hillside areas to preserve the rural character of the
hillsides.
Strategies:
1. Mass Grading in New Construction. Follow natural land contour and avoid mass grading
in new construction, especially in flood hazard or hillside areas. Grading large, flat areas shall be
avoided.
2. Retaining Significant Trees. Retain significant specimen trees, especially when they grow
in groves or clusters, and integrate them into the developed site. The Montebello foothills at the
south and west boundaries of the valley floor are a scenic backdrop to the City, adding to its sense
of scale and variety of color. It's impossible to guarantee an unobstructed view of the hills from
any vantage point, but people should be able to see the foothills from public gathering places.
Policy 2-49: Views for Public Facilities
Design and layout public facilities, particularly public open spaces, so they include views of the
foothills or other nearby natural features, and plan hillside developments to minimize visual and
other impacts on adjacent public open space.
Strategy:
Development Near Public Open Space. Remove private driveways and building sites as far as
possible from property boundaries located next to public open space preserves and parks to
enhance the natural open space character and protect plants and animals. Most of the hillsides in
Cupertino's planning area are unincorporated and undeveloped, so County policies dictate their
final land use. County policies provide for low-density residential, agricultural, park, open space
and wildlife uses, as well as mineral resource extraction. Clustering and dedication of open
space are required for residential development. Most policies are compatible with Cupertino's,
except for those relating to expansion of mineral resource areas, which conflict with the City's
hillside protection and compatible land use policies. County development, particularly iflocated
near Cupertino's urban fringe area, should consider Cupertino's General Plan. Visual impacts,
road access, traffic impacts and other service demands should be assessed in consultation
with Cupertino's plans and personnel.
Policy 2-50: Santa Clara County General Plan
Hillsides policies found in the Santa Clara County General Plan adopted in 1994 are included in
the Cupertino General Plan by reference and are applicable to the unincorporated hillside area.
These policies are incorporated because they are consistent with hillside protection goals. If
changes are proposed in the County plan that are inconsistent with the City's hillside protection
goals, then the City should protest those changes as well as not incorporate them into the City's
General Plan.
Policy 2-51: County Development
County development, particularly iflocated near Cupertino's urban fringe area, should consider
Cupertino's General Plan.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES
An important part of Cupertino's quality oflife is the high standard of public services and
facilities enjoyed by residents and workers in Cupertino. This section discusses schools and the
library. Other services and facilities-police, fire protection, utilities and waste disposal-are
discussed in the Public Health and Safety Element of this Plan.
SCHOOL DISTRICTS
Cupertino is served by excellent institutions of public education. Cupertino Union School
District, Fremont Union High School District and Foothill-De Anza Community College District
provide nationally acclaimed elementary, secondary and post-secondary education, respectively.
This group of school districts is one of the primary attractions of Cupertino for home buyers,
particularly families with school-age children. While the City is not directly involved in the
24
provision of education, it does control growth and development that can affect schools by
increasing student enrollment beyond the means of schools to service them. It is thus crucial for
the City to continue working with its school districts to maintain their current high quality.
Policy 2-52: Planning for Schools
Recognize the fmancial impact of increased development on the school districts' ability to
provide staff and facilities. Work with the districts to assure that the continued high level of
school services can be provided prior to granting approval for new development.
Policy 2-53: Pedestrian Access
Create pedestrian access between new subdivisions and school sites. Review existing
neighborhood circulation plans to improve safety and access for pedestrians and bicyclists to
school sites.
Policy 2-54: De Anza College
Allow land uses not traditionally considered part of a college to be built at De Anza College.
Such land uses should further integrate the campus into the community, provide facilities and
services not offered in the city or alleviate impacts created by the college.
LIBRARY SERVICES
Cupertino Library is another important community resource, with 54,326 Cupertino area residents
holding library cards. The library is operated by the Santa Clara County Library under the Joint
Powers Authority Agreement, and is funded through library-dedicated property taxes and City
general fund revenues. The original 24,000 sq. ft. library building on Torre Avenue was opened
in 1971. In 1988, the building was remodeled to add 13,000 sq. ft. for a total building area of
37,000 sq. ft. Circulation (the number of items checked out) has increased each year since the
library reopened in 1988. Circulation has increased by over 1,000,000 items annually, an increase
of 144% from 693,130 items circulated in fiscal year 1989-90 to 1,693,807 items circulated in
fiscal year 2000-01. The number of annual visits to the library has increased over 60% in that
same time, from 337,030 visits in 1989-90 to 540,983 visits in 2000-01. The library collection has
also outgrown the remodeled facility. In 1989-90 the collection numbered 211,947 items. In
2000-01 the collection numbers 312,614 items. Shelves are crowded; there are not enough seats,
nor enough public access computers to meet public demand. Library staff has reorganized
shelving, seating, and collections to make the most efficient use of space, and has provided new
technology for enhanced service to the community. As a result of the need for improved library
services, a new library was approved by the Cupertino City Council, with the support of the Santa
Clara County library staff.
Policy: 2-55: Library Service Level
Recognize that if the community desires a higher level of library service, cooperation between the
County of Santa Clara and City of Cupertino in expanding library services and facilities is
required.
Policy 2-56: Library Planning
Integrate and coordinate any library facility planning into all applicable General Plan policies,
such as transportation, pedestrian and bike trails.
Policy 2-57: Improving Library Service
Encourage the library to continue to incorporate new technology to enhance service levels within
the library system. Encourage the continued evolution of library collections and services to meet
the needs of Cupertino residents of all ages, its richly diverse population, and its local businesses.
HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
Historic Resources
25
Before European settlement, Native Americans resided in the area that is now Cupertino. The
Ohlone Indians had lived in the Rancho San Antonio area for over 3,000 years. The area was fIrst
explored by Spanish soldiers when an expedition led by Colonel Juan Bautista de Anza passed
through in March of 1776, and later was settled by numerous European immigrants who
recognized the potential of the fertile land. They established fanns and soon enjoyed a thriving
agricultural economy. The village of Cupertino sprang up at the crossroads of Saratoga-
Sunnyvale Road (now De Anza Boulevard) and Stevens Creek Road. It was first known as West
Side, but by 1898, the post office at the Crossroads needed a new name to distinguish it from
other similarly named towns. John T. Doyle, a San Francisco lawyer and historian, had given the
name Cupertino to his winery, in recognition of the name bestowed on the nearby creek by Petrus
Font. In 1904, the name was applied to the Crossroads and to the post office when the Home
Union Store incorporated under the name, The Cupertino Store, and moved to the northeast
comer of the Crossroads. Many of Cupertino's pioneer settlers planted grapes in the late l800s.
Vineyards and wineries proliferated on Montebello Ridge, on the lower foothills, and on the flat
lands below. As these orchards flourished the valley became known for a profusion of blossoms
in spring. Many more people passed through the Cupertino area fIrst by electric railway and later
by car to view all the blossoms in the "Valley of Heart's Delight." Because ofthe electric railway,
the Monta Vista area of Cupertino developed. Monta Vista was the name of its fIrst housing tract.
In the late 1940's, Cupertino was swept up in Santa Clara Valley's postwar population explosion.
Concerned by unplanned development, higher taxes and piecemeal annexation to adjacent cities,
Cupertino's community leaders began a drive in 1954 for incorporation. Incorporation was
approved in a September 27, 1955 election. Cupertino officially became Santa Clara County's
13th City on October 10,1955. Today, Cupertino is part of a world-renowned high technology
center, known as "Silicon Valley," and is home to several companies producing leading edge
computers and software. Historic properties show Cupertino's past. These sites remind residents
of the colorful people who built and occupied them. Most of the historically significant properties
are privately owned. Private owners and City government can work together to maintain the
historic value of these properties. A successful example of this cooperation is the rehabilitation of
the De La Vega stable in the Rancho Deep Cliff residential subdivision. The "Tack House" was
refurbished extensively inside but its exterior remains much the same. It is the 61-home
community's recreation center and meeting hall.
GOALG PROTECTION OF HISTORICALLY AND ARCHAEOLOGICALL Y
SIGNIFICANT STRUCTURES, SITES AND ARTIFACTS
Policy 2-58: Landmark Rehabilitation
Undertake an active partnership with private owners of landmark structures to rehabilitate the
buildings for public or semi-private occupancy in order to retain their historic character.
Strategy
Flexible Standards. Allow flexible interpretation of zoning ordinance and building code
standards not essential to public health and safety. These could include reduced on-site parking
provisions or lesser setback distances.
Policy 2-59: Archaeologically Sensitive Areas
Protect archaeologically sensitive areas.
Strategy
Development Investigation. Require an investigation for development proposed in areas
likely to be archaeologically sensitive, such as along stream courses and in oak groves, to
determine if significant archaeological resources may be affected by the project. Also require
appropriate mitigation measures in the project design.
Policy 2-60: Native American Burials
Protect Native American burial sites.
26
Strategy
Upon discovery of such burials during construction, take action prescribed by State law,
including stoppage of work in surrounding area, notification of appropriate authorities and
reburial of remains in an appropriate manner.
Policy 2-61: Heritage Trees
Protect and maintain heritage trees in a healthy state.
Strategy
Heritage Tree List. Establish and periodically revise a heritage tree list that includes trees of
importance to the community.
Cultural Resources
Public art enhances Cupertino's image by giving it character and identity, and making it attractive
to residents and visitors alike. It enhances a business's image by providing good public relations
and good will within the community. The City intends to make public art a reality by promoting it
in public and private development and by incorporating art works into future revitalization
plans where possible.
GOALH A CIVIC ENVIRONMENT WHERE THE ARTS EXPRESS AN INNOVATIVE
SPIRIT, CELEBRATE A RICH CULTURAL DIVERSITY AND INSPIRE
INDIVIDUAL AND COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Policy 2-62: Public Arts
Stimulate opportunities for the arts through cooperative relations between local business and the
City.
Strategies:
1. Ordinance. Develop and adopt a One-Percent for Art ordinance, which requires public and
private development to set aside 1 % of their total project budget for on-site art.
2. Promote Art. Promote visible artworks in public and private development and gateways to
the City.
3. Public Art Guidelines. Follow Public Art guidelines to assure that the proposed public art is
appropriately scaled and fits into the context of its surroundings.
4. Artist Workspace. Encourage the development of artist workspace, such as live/work units.
OPEN SPACE, PARKS AND TRAILS
Cupertino's open space policies and programs have guided the development of regional,
community and neighborhood parks, playing fields and trails that are treasured resources to its
residents. Residents and workers have numerous nearby choices for enjoying nature, hiking,
golfing, playing tennis or soccer, working out or just playing. These activities build community
by bringing people together in common gathering places and tying neighborhoods together
through connecting trails.
REGIONAL RESOURCES
Several public agencies share the task of acquiring, maintaining, accessing and developing open
space lands for the enjoyment of residents of Cupertino and its neighboring cities. Some of these
public open space lands provide high or low-intensity recreation; some emphasize scenic beauty;
others preserve vegetation or wildlife habitats; still others help control urban sprawl.
MID PENINSULA REGIONAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, created in 1972 by the County electorate, states
that its mission is "to acquire and preserve a regiona1.greenbelt of open space land in perpetuity;
protect and restore the natural environment; and provide opportunities for ecologically sensitive
public enjoyment and education." District lands in Cupertino are designated for low intensity
27
use to give long-tenn protection from encroaching urbanization. These lands are acquired
according to four principal criteria: scenic preservation, preservation of unique sites, the guidance
of urban fonn, and low intensity recreational opportunities. Guidance of urban fonn requires
cooperation and coordination with Cupertino's planning efforts. Consequently, the District
contacts jurisdictions when purchases are considered within their spheres of
influence or boundary agreement areas. The City has policies that encourage the Midpeninsula
Regional Open Space District and the County Park System to complete phases of their programs
and to buy certain properties it feels need to be owned by the public but still kept undisturbed.
The City recognizes that fiscal constraints on regional, as well as local, park financing will affect
park acquisition programs.
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
Most of the hillsides in Cupertino's planning area are unincorporated and undeveloped, so Santa
Clara County's hillside policies and ordinances dictate their fmalland use. The County's General
Plan calls for the hillside area to be preserved in an open condition with uses that support and
enhance the rural character, which protect and promote wise use of natural resources, and which
avoid or reduce the risks imposed by natural hazards found in these areas. Allowed uses include
very low-density residential development, mineral extraction, agriculture, grazing and wildlife
refuges, among others. In 1997, as part of the review and approval by the City of Cupertino for
partial development of the San Jose Diocese's St. Joseph's Seminary property, in the Cupertino
foothills, the County was able to acquire 133 acres of open space lands at no cost, to add to its
previous holdings in the area.
SANTA CLARA COUNTY PARKS PROGRAM
The Santa Clara County park program operates on a voter-approved measure in which a fixed
portion ofthe property taxes are set aside from the General Fund to acquire and develop a
regional park system. It emphasizes completing Upper Stevens Creek Park and its connection to
Stevens Creek. Because the upper portions of Stevens Canyon are environmentally important,
the County Parks and Recreation Department has made a commitment to purchase lands to
connect these two parks. Another important County park that serves Cupertino residents is
Rancho San Antonio County Park, south ofI-280 and west of Foothill Boulevard.
GOAL I A FULL RANGE OF PARK AND RECREATIONAL RESOURCES, FOR
LINKING THE COMMUNITY, OUTDOOR RECREATION, PRESERVATION
OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY
Policy 2-62: Stevens Creek Park
The Santa Clara County Parks program should pursue the goal of connecting upper and lower
Stevens Creek Parks. The County parks budget should pursue acquisition to the extent possible
and emphasize passive park development in keeping with the pristine nature of the hillsides.
Work to keep the watershed and storage basin properties of Stevens Creek.
Policy 2-63: Continuous Open Space
Actively pursue inter-agency cooperation in acquiring properties near the western planning area
boundary to complete a continuous open space green belt along the lower foothills and to connect
the open space to the trail system and the neighborhoods.
SANTA CLARA VALLEYWATER DISTRICT
The Santa Clara Valley Water District can help Cupertino carry out its open space policies by
continuing its policy of cooperating with local government to fund access and restoration
projects. It helped Cupertino prepare its natural flood plain policy for Stevens Creek between
Stevens Creek Boulevard and the Stevens Creek reservoir and directly helped to buy open-space
lands within McClellan Ranch Park. The Water District has a plan to partner with cities and
the county to provide access to creekside trails and parks for recreational opportunities, This plan,
the "Clean, Safe Creeks and Natural Flood Protection" plan, requires the Water District to
28
incorporate trails, parks and recreational opportunities into existing or new flood protection
projects.
COMMUNITY RESOURCES
The City of Cupertino's main role in open-space planning, in the past, has been in developing
neighborhood parks. In the future, in order to create a stronger sense of community, Cupertino
needs to also develop and emphasize more community park facilities. Presently Memorial Park,
which encompasses the Community and Senior Centers, is the only venue for community
festivals, large group events and cultural programs. The development of new community
recreational facilities, such as a skateboard park, community gym and teen center, have not been
proposed for inclusion within neighborhood parks due to the intensity of use, noise and
unacceptable traffic they would generate.
The Sports Center, 6.2 acres at Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road, was acquired as an
extension of Memorial Park. It is one of the few City-owned sites appropriate for intensive
recreational use, due to its location on major arterial streets, its proximity to public transit and its
location in relationship to the Community and Senior Centers.
Blackberry Farm is a 33-acre park, open space and golf course facility along Stevens Creek
Boulevard between Scenic Boulevard and Byrne Avenue that charges a per-person entry fee and
is only open weekdays in the summer. The City is preparing a master plan for this facility in
combination with the adjacent McClellan Ranch, Simms and Stocklmeir properties. Council goals
for the plan include accommodating year-around use, incorporating a trail system, minimizing
neighborhood impacts and restoring Stevens Creek corridor.
The City's master plan for this entire acreage is intended to convert the facilities ITom majority
non-resident to majority resident use and will allow the inclusion of the acreage in the park
inventory.
Policy 2-64: Future Use of Blackberry Farm
Retain some form of revenue-generating potential at Blackberry Farm (through the life ofthe
municipal bond that fmanced its purchase) as the uses are transitioned from non-resideÍlt to
resident use. Increase community park acreage, and consider the fmancial implications of this
transition.
Strategy:
Blackberry Farm Master Plan. Prepare a master plan for Blackberry Fann, and solicit broad
public participation.
Policy 2-65: Recreational Opportunities for Special Needs
Provide more recreational opportunities for special needs groups, such as a Braille or ITagrance
park for the blind, and wholly accessible trails for the aging and/or disabled.
PRIVATE OPEN SPACE RESOURCES
There are several private, open-space and recreational-activity businesses in Cupertino's planning
area, including a golf course, riding stables and clubs offering tennis and swimming. They are
valuable to the community because they provide services that are not traditionally provided by the
public sector on City or regional parklands. Land use controls and incentives should be
incorporated into public policy so these operations can continue. Private open space has been
secured through the development review process. Several hillside subdivisions, as well as valley-
floor apartment complexes, offer both natural and improved recreational facilities to their
residents. Utility system power line corridors in the City's foothills are another category of
privately controlled open space. An example of public-private partnership for the joint use of
29
private open space is the approximately one-acre site at the southeast corner of Stevens Creek and
De Anza Boulevards. Adjacent to a hotel and apartment complex, this privately owned area is
available for public use.
Policy 2-66: Private Open Space and Recreationa/ Facilities
Encourage the continued existence and profitability of private open space and recreation facilities
through incentives and development controls.
Policy 2-67: Public Use of Private Open Space
Seek cooperation from private landowners for public use of private open space.
TRAILS
Trails and paths connect people to each other and to open space and park resources. They provide
an alternative to driving from place to place. Promoting more trails and connectivity along creeks,
hillsides, and through neighborhoods is a major goal of the General Plan. Providing access to
open space and parks is not completely dependent on trails. Sidewalks and streets can also
connect pedestrians to their destinations. However, occasional barriers break the continuity.
These need to be identified and corrected. The status of the six major trail corridors is as follows:
1) Stevens Creek
The Stevens Creek Flood Plain is Cupertino's most prominent urban open
space/trail resource. The land is designated for recreation and fanning, with adjoining
properties set aside for low-density residential use. The Stevens Creek Trail plan retains the
open space character of the Stevens Creek Flood Plain between the Stevens Creek reservoir and
Stevens Creek Boulevard and offers historical significance relating to the Juan Bautista De Anza
Trail designation. Since the late 1950s, many jurisdictions have advocated a fonnal urban trail
following Stevens Creek, extending from the San Francisco Bay to the Pacific Ocean.
Cupertino's 1964, 1972 and 1993 General Plans have all proposed an ambitious plan to buy lands
for this purpose. The City's acquisition of Linda Vista Park, McClellan Ranch, Blackberry Fann,
and the Simms and Stocklmeir properties support these plans. The City's master plan for this 60-
acre corridor will connect these properties into an urban traiVlinear park. The Stevens Creek Trail
Feasibility study concluded that it is feasible to construct 7.7 miles of separated and on-street
multi-use paths connecting Rancho San Antonio and Stevens Creek county parks. To complete
the trail, a public trail easement through the 150-acre fonDer quarry property south of Linda Vista
Park will be established when the property is proposed for development and City review takes
place. The fonDer quarry haul road connects Linda Vista Park to McClellan Road. It is under the
same ownership as the quarry and is necessary to link these properties. Full build out of the
Stevens Creek trail is expected to take 10 to 15 years.
2) Calabazas Creek
There is an opportunity for a trail along Calabazas Creek that would connect the Vallco planning
area to Cupertino High School and Creekside Park. The Santa Clara Valley Water District's
"Clean, Safe Creeks and Natural Flood Protection Plan" calls for identifying recreation
opportunities along the Creek as part of the flood protection project.
3) San Tomas-Aquino/Saratoga Creek
Cupertino's section of the 12-mile San Tomas-Aquino Trail crosses into the City from Santa
Clara on Pruneridge Avenue and extends to bicycle lanes on Bollinger Road, which fonDS the city
limit between San Jose and Cupertino. Trail planning and implementation involved the County,
neighboring jurisdictions and the Santa Clara Valley Water District.
4) Union Pacific Railroad
The 8.7-mile long proposed Union Pacific Rail Trail corridor extends through the cities of
Cupertino, Saratoga, Campbell and the town of Los Gatos. The trail would link to the Los Gatos
Creek Trail, connecting the two most heavily used parks in Santa Clara County, Rancho San
Antonio County Park and Vasona County Park. A feasibility study found that this project is not
feasible at this time. Acquisition of right-of-way or easements is anticipated when the Railroad
30
goes out of service in 20 years. The corridor is designated as a proposed trail on the Trail
Linkages diagram.
S) Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge
The proposed Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge links the north side ofI-280 to De Anza College,
Memorial Park and the Oaks Shopping Center. It is consistent with the De Anza College
Facilities Master Plan and the Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan. Implementation is
scheduled for the years 2004-2005.
6) Regnart Creek and West Foothills Trails
There are opportunities for trails along Regnart Creek. Several private and public projects have
incorporated sections of trails as part of the development plans. A comprehensive trail plan for
Regnart Creek, as well as one for the west foothills, would be advantageous, to provide consistent
trail designs for future development.
Policy 2-68: Open Space and Trail Linkages
Dedicate or acquire open space lands and trail linkages to connect areas and provide for a more
walkable community.
Strategies:
I. Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan. Implement the recommendations of the
Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan to develop a City trail/pedestrian linkage between
major employment centers, the Heart of the City and major open space areas.
2. Trail Projects. Implement the trail projects described in this element.
3. Dedicated Trails or Easements. Require dedication or easements for trails, as well as
their implementation, as part of the development process, where appropriate.
4. Joint Use Agreement. Establish a Joint Use Agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Water
District that sets standards and implementation measures for creek trails.
NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY PARKS
Cupertino's most significant open space and park resources are neighborhood parks. They are
essential to providing convenient recreational opportunities and attractive vistas for Cupertino's
families. Cupertino has aggressively pursued various types of community recreational resources.
Private open space, trails, school playing fields and sports facilities offer a full-range of
recreational choices. Escalating land costs and a reduction in local funding means the City must
consider new ways to acquire parkland, such as long-term joint-use agreements and development
dedications. The City should also reconsider the uses of all existing facilities, so as to provide
more community-oriented parks. Cupertino's neighborhood parks system serves the active and
passive neighborhood and community parks recreation needs of its residents. Table 2-B lists the
existing park and recreation acreage by area.
ACCESSIBiliTY
Some areas within neighborhoods are isolated by physical barriers, including land forms,
freeways, railroad tracks, or streets with heavy traffic. Accessibility is a major consideration in
neighborhood parks. Figure 2-L shows the neighborhoods and the 1/2 mile service area radius for
neighborhood parks. The shaded service areas show physical barriers, such as freeways, railroad
tracks or stream beds. The diagram does not show streets with heavy traffic. These busy streets
may discourage some people, especially young children, from visiting nearby parks.
The City of Cupertino shall continue its commitment to a responsive and attractive open space
and park system by adhering to the following policies.
Policy 2-69: Park Acreage
Provide parkland equal to a minimum of three acres for each 1,000 residents.
Policy 2-70: Park Walking Distance
Ensure that each household is within a half-mile walk of a neighborhood park, or community park
with neighborhood facilities, and that the route is reasonably free of physical barriers, including
streets with heavy traffic. Wherever possible, provide pedestrian links between parks.
31
Policy 2-71: Recreational Intensity
Recognize the level of recreational intensity appropriate to each neighborhood park, so that future
park planning can be based on the desired intensity of use.
Policy 2-72: Park Minimum Acreage
Plan parks to be at least 3.5 acres for flexibility of use. The acquisition and development of parks
less than 3.5 acres may be considered according to the following priorities:
High Priority - Designated neighborhoods that have no park or recreation areas.
Moderate Priority - Designated neighborhoods that have school grounds and no parkland.
Low Priority - Designated neighborhoods that have park or recreation areas less than three acres
per 1,000 residents.
Accessibility of residents to parks should be considered in detennining priorities. In addition.
çonsider pocket parks in new and rcnovated commcrcial proiects and ncw residential
developments for respite and gathering places.
Policy 2-73: Park Design
Design parks to keep long-tenn maintenance costs low. Maximize the use of native plants and
minimize water use.
Policy 2-74: Park Access and Visibility
Parks shall be designed to enhance public safety by providing visibility to the street and access by
public safety responders.
Policy 2-75: Acquisition of Surplus School Properly
A portion of developer fees shall be held in reserve for the possible acquisition of surplus school
properties if they become available. The City should take advantage of the Naylor Act to
purchase surplus school sites.
Policy 2-76: Park and Open Space Acquisition Program
Develop the City's Park Acquisition Strategy, based upon the proposed parks as outlined in Table
2-C. The Park Acquisition Program is further based upon three broad acquisition objectives:
I. Complete the Parks Acquisition Program in those areas that are park deficient.
2. Maintain an adequate inventory of sports fields.
3. Retain creek sites and other natural open space areas.
Policy 2-77: Acquisition of Additional Parklands
Additional parklands are identified and shall be acquired or dedicated in the Rancho Rinconada
area, in the Val1co Park area, and in the area north ofI-280 near Stelling Road. The General Plan
is a policy document that will be used yearly to help in preparing the updated Capital
Improvement Program. The plan is subject to revisions depending upon the availability of City,
County and State funds and any subsequent actions of the Cupertino Union School District
regarding the disposition of surplus school sites.
Policy 2-78: School Playing Fields
Preserve school playing fields for school and co=unity recreational uses.
Strategies:
I. School Expansion. Encourage schools to meet their expansion needs by building upward
instead of outward into recreation fields.
2. School Parking Lots. Encourage schools to seek alternate parking or transportation
solutions, rather than building new parking lots that infringe on playing fields.
IMPLEMENTATION
Cupertino will not have sufficient funds to buy enough parkland to meet the minimum standard of
three acres for each 1,000 residents in all neighborhoods. Table 2-C shows the park and open
space acreage proposed by area. An acquisition strategy that stretches limited funds by using
school sites, expanding and revising existing park uses, taking advantage of State and other
funds, and park dedication requirements for major new developments will be based upon these
needs.
Policy 2-79: New Residential Development in Urban Core Areas
32
New residential development in the urban core areas shall provide park and recreational space
and facilities. The need for dedication of public parkland and the provision of private recreational
space and facilities shall be determined when a master plan is submitted for the development,
based on the following criteria:
1. Where feasible, public park space, as opposed to private, should be provided. Active park areas
are encouraged that will serve the community need. Passive areas are acceptable, when
appropriate to an urban setting. Features could include paths, benches, water features, picnic
tables, public art, trees and gardens. They should be oriented toward the street or an activity area
where it is easily accessible to the public. Passive areas deemed inaccessible or unlikely to be
used by the public should not be credited toward park dedication. Providing public trail
connections may be given partial credit toward park dedication.
2 . Where feasible, public park and recreational facilities should be provided for those who live
and work in Cupertino.
3. New residential developments should be encouraged to blend their recreational facilities into
the community at large.
4. Park fees should be collected based on a formula that considers the extent to which the public
and/or private park space and facilities meet the park need.
Policy 2-80: Required Public Park Land
Require dedication of public parkland in areas where significant new housing units are identified
to meet State requirements, particularly in the Homestead Road area and the vacant land on
Stevens Creek Boulevard near Tantau Avenue.
Policy 2-81: Recreational Facilities
The City of Cupertino recognizes the public benefits derived from facilities such gymnasiums,
swimming pools and/or tennis courts and will work to provide these facilities as the use of school
facilities is maximized.
GENERAL POLICIES
Policy 2-82: Boundaries Between Land Uses
Base boundaries between land use classifications upon lot lines of established land use activities,
public streets, and constructed or natural physical barriers or a combination of any of these. Show
the precise boundary on the zoning map.
Policy 2-83: Residential Density Ranges on the Map
Recognize that residential density ranges on the General Plan Map and its legend shows the
desired development intensity for a general area. The actual gross dwelling-unit density may be
slightly different if the properties reflect the general development character of neighboring
properties.
Policy 2-84: Public and Quasi-Public Activities
Allow public and quasi-public activities in commercial or office land use categories with zoning
and use permit review based on the following criteria:
I. The proposed project must have similar building forms, population, traffic, noise and
inuastructure impacts as the existing land use categories.
2 . The proposed project must maintain a commercial interface in commercial designations by
offering retail activities, creating a storeuont appearance or other design or use options that are
similar to commercial activities.
Strategy:
Commercial ordinance. Amend the commercial zoning ordinance to allow public and quasi-
public activities as conditional uses.
Policy 2-85: Closed School Site Use
Designate all public school sites for public use. Sites may be used for quasi-public or institutional
activities or both, or for housing. The dwelling unit intensity and development pattern shall reflect
33
the character of the surrounding residential districts. The future of unused school sites shall also
reflect the City's park acquisition program in the Open Space and Trails section ofthis element.
Policy 2-86: New Drive-Up Services
Pennit new drive-up service facilities for commercial, industrial or institutional use only when
adequate circulation, parking, noise control, architecture features, and landscaping are compatible
with the visual character of the surrounding uses and residential areas are adequately
buffered. Prohibit drive-up services in the Downtown Village Commercial Node. Further evaluate
any proposed drive-up services site for confonnance with other goals and policies of the Plan.
Policy 2-87: Late-Evening Entertainment Activities
Discourage late-evening entertainment activities such as cocktail lounges, recreational facilities
and theaters in the relatively narrow depth of Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard
properties where they abut low-density residential properties. Allow late-evening entertainment
activities in the Downtown Village and Vallco Park and other large properties that are isolated
from residential districts.
Section 3
Housing
INTRODUCTION
Cupertino residents place high value on their homes and neighborhoods. Policies in all the
General Plan elements are directed toward maintaining high quality residential areas. The
Housing element focuses on several important principles of the General Plan: balance and
diversity. Providing an adequate supply of housing assures that office and commercial growth,
which creates the need for additional employees, is balanced with housing growth. Providing a
variety of housing types, particularly apartments, assures that a diverse population of Cupertino
residents has access to housing. The Housing element fulfills the requirements of State Housing
Element law, which requires an analysis of the housing stock and households, estimates or
Regional Housing Needs, evaluation of past progress in meeting Housing Element goals, and
projected goals, policies and programs. The Housing element must be periodically reviewed for
certification by the State Department of Housing and Community Development. Because much of
the infonnation required for State certification is statistical and
must be updated every five years, Cupertino has prepared a separate Technical Document that
includes the data required for State compliance, which is incorporated by
reference as part of the General Plan. This Section includes a summary of some of the more
significant infonnation found in the Technical document, and a complete list of
the goals, policies and programs for the time frame for the Housing Element.
Community Profile
POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLDS
At the time of Cupertino's incorporation in 1955, the City's population within the incorporated
area was less than 2,500 people. From 1955 to 1960 the population increased from 2,500 to 3,664
people. Over the following four decades with advent of the computer/electronic technology,
Cupertino, like other cities in Santa Clara County, experienced a rapid increase in population.
Between 1960 and the year 2000, Cupertino experienced a substantial growth in population,
going from 3,664 people to 50,546 people. This accelerated growth reflected northern Santa Clara
County's transition from an agricultural center to worldwide headquarters for many high
technology industries and annexations that took place during the ten-year period between 1970
and 1980, which added 12,000 residents to the population of the City. The graph below (Figure 3-
34
A) illustrates Cupertino's population growth over the past four decades It is expected that Santa
Clara County will continue to be the most populous county within the San Francisco Bay Area
region in the future. Population estimates prepared by the Association of Bay Area Governments
(ABAG) project that Santa Clara County's population will increase ITom its present number of
1,755,300 persons to 2,016,700 persons by the year 2020. ABAG also projects that the population
within the City of Cupertino and its sphere of influence will increase by 19% during the same
twenty-year period. This would bring Cupertino's population to an estimated total of 66,400
persons by the year 2020.
ETHNIC COMPOSITION
Historically, Cupertino's population has been predominantly Caucasian, with minorities
represented in relative small percentages. Between 1975 and 1980, the Caucasian population
decreased ITom 89% to 86%. There was a corresponding increase in the Asian-American
population ITom 3% to 6.9%, while the other ethnic groups remained proportionally similar in
size during the same period. According to the 1990 Census, between the years of 1980 and 1990
the Asian-American population increased ITom 8.9% to 23%, while other groups experienced
very modest growth. The 2000 Census revealed that Cupertino has become a more diverse
community. Between 1990 and 2000 the Asian-American population experienced a substantial
increase ITom 23% to 44%, almost equaling the Caucasian population, which in the 2000 Census
data indicated was at 50% of the total population. No other ethnic groups experienced such
significant increases during this period. The graph below illustrates Cupertino's ethnic
composition according to the 2000 Census data.
AGE DISTRIBUTION
The age distribution of the City of Cupertino changed during the period of the 1990-2000 decade.
The percentage of children, teenagers and older adults (65 or over) increased while the 20-65 age
group declined. This is an indication that Cupertino's population is maturing. This is consistent
with the character of the state-wide population. It is estimated that persons over 55 years of age
will represent 26% of the total state-wide population by the year 2020. In 1990, the median age
was 36 years; in the year 2000 the median age was 38 years. The graph below illustrates the
breakdown of the City's population by age.
HOUSEHOLDS
For the purposes of evaluating housing supply and demand, it is helpful to translate population
figures into household data. The U. S Bureau of the Census defines household as all persons who
occupy a housing unit, which may include single persons living alone, families related through
marriage or blood, and unrelated individuals living together.
According to 2000 Census data, there were 18,204 households in the City of Cupertino.
According to the General Plan there were 20.032. Approximately 75% of these households were
classified as "family households" and the remaining 25% were "non-family" households
(primarily individuals living alone). It is estimated that 13% of all Cupertino households can be
classified as "lower income" households. This 13% figure includes 1,547 households who are
estimated to be "very-low-income and 801 as "low-income" households. In 2001, a household of
four persons with a maximum income of $43,650 annually was considered "very-low-income", if
their income didn't exceed $69,050 annually, they would be considered "low-income".
Household size has remained relatively flat in recent decades. In 1980, the average household size
in Cupertino was 2.75 persons per household. Between 1980 and 1990, the household size
decrease to 2.60 persons per household. However, by 2000, the average household size returned
to the 2.75 persons per household.
35
HOUSING UNITS AND TYPE
A substantial portion of Cupertino's housing stock was built after World Was II and reflects its
suburban, residential character. According to 2000 Census data, there are 18,682 housing units.
According to the General Plan there were 20,032. A comparison of 1990 and 2000 housing types
is shown in Figure 3-D. There were a total of 8 mobile homes in Cupertino in 2000. The
percentage of single family units in the housing stock has remained fairly constant in Cupertino in
the 1990-2000 decade
Currently, single family homes remain the predominant housing type. In 1990, 58.8% of all
housing units were single-family, detached units and 13.% were single-family, attached units, for
a total of71.8% of the total housing stock. The remaining 21.2% were multi-family or other.
Projections of future housing demand by type of unit, based on household income and
construction costs, indicated that if housing affordable to the entire spectrum of economic groups
is to be made available, the supply of multi-family units must increase.
Housing costs are high in Cupertino. In January, 2001, the median sales price for a single family
home in Cupertino was in excess of $1 million dollars. For the same general time period, the
average rent for a multi-family rental unit was $2,353 per month. These costs far exceed the
ability of very-low and low income households to afford housing. It is estimated that in 2001 at
least 1 ,651 lower income households were "overpaying" for housing (paying more than 30% of
their income for housing).
From 1990-2000, a total of2,074 new units were added to Cupertino's housing stock. This
represents a production rate of approximately 200 units per year.
Projected Housing Needs{Adiust to the amended totals in Implementation
ProQram 1 below)
1. NEW CONSTRUCTION
A}-Adequate Sites For ABAG Estimated New Construction Need
ABAG has estimated that the City needs to provide adequate sites to accommodate 2,720 units
for the time period of 1999-2006. After adjusting for the housing units already provided between
1999-2001, the revised estimate is that adequate sites are needed for 2,325 units from 2001-2006
or 465 units per year. Bascd on the fact that the Cit) dming the past decade has added an a. erage
of 200 ~nits pef) ear to the he"3ing steck, this 5 ) ear ge81 of 2,325 Imits "ill need to be
aggressi,el) pms~ed bet"ee" 2001 2006.
BY Balaneed Community Of JOB And Housing Opportunities
One efthe most challenging iS3"OS facing C"pcrtine is the goal ef aahic,ing a better balance
bcL. een jebs and he~sing in tLe eOl11ll1tlnit). In 2001, ,'\BAG estimatcd that thcre \. ere 2.1 jobs
f.or e, Of) hetlsehold in Ctlportine. This rntio it,dieatcs that C"portino is a "job rich" com"'tlnit).
Thore is a necd to aehie,c a better balance bct"eonjebs and housing, se that s"ppl) is mere in
balance ..ith den,and. In erdcr te aehie.e this, thc Ceneral Plan policies in,pro.e thc jobslheusing
"almlce b) ir,ereasing residential gro"th and decreasing nonrcside¡Aial growth.
2. AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The goal of adequate sites for 2,325 nc.. "nits f-er 200] 2006 is further refined b) ",timati¡,g the
number of "nits needed for, CI) lov., 10" and moderate ineBme hO1;sehelds. Adequate sites at
appropriate densities need to be provided to accommodate housing units affordable to the
following household income groups. Affordable units for the remainder of the plamling period
will be achieved through the Below Market Rate program.
Household Income Category Number of Units
Very Low-Income ~
36
Low-Income
Moderate-Income
Above Moderate-Income
TOTAL
~
~
1.133 Units
2,325 Units
Figure 3-E. Household Income.
3. CONSERVATION OF EXISTING HOUSING
The City's existing rental stock provides a source of affordable housing for lower and moderate
income households. In 2001, there were 292 rental units with affordability controls in Cupertino.
In addition, there were 3 group homes providing housing for a total of 25 persons/households.
One of the most significant needs during the 2001-2006 time period is to conserve the existing
rental housing stock. In particular, the City will monitor the potential conversion of any
affordable units to market rate, specifically the 100 unit Sunnyview development (affordability
subsidies are scheduled to expire in 2004 ).
4. SPECIAL HOUSING NEEDS
Some of the households that have special housing needs in Cupertino include homeless, elderly
and disabled households. The City needs to continue its relationship with special need providers
and to support the provision of additional housing opportunities where feasible.
5. EQUAL ACCESS TO HOUSING
A fundamental right is the ability for all persons to have equal access to housing, regardless of
factors such as religion, etbnicity, age, or sexual orientation. It is important that the City continue
to ensure equal access to housing and to support groups and organizations that provide fair
housing counseling/infonnation services.
Goals, Policies and Programs are summarized on the following pages:
GOAL A AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS FOR ALL ECONOMIC
SEGMENTS
.n-lllicy 3 1: Snfjieie..t RcsidelitiaRy Zøll"d lalld Jm Ncw CØllSt! netio,. }'lëed.
Designate sufficient rcsidentiall) ~ened land at appropriate den3ities te pre. ide adC<'luate sites
that.. ill meet and e;wced AB/\C's e3timatc of Cupertino'3 ne.. cof!stroetian need of 2,325 units
f-or 2001 2006. The follo..ing abjeeti.es meet that need.
Units i\.ffordablc ta Vel) La.. Inea1Le:
Units ,^.ffordable to La.. Ineame:
Units ,"'ffordable ta Madorate Income:
Units ?,ffordable to Aba. e Moderate raceme:
2001 2206 TOTAL
378 "nits
188 Ul,its
626 "aits
1,133uaits
2,325 UnIts
Additional uait3 are allo.. cd for the remainder of the plmming period. ,^.ffordabJe emits
for the remainder of the planning period.. ill he aehie. od through the Bcla.. Market Rate
program. 2,290
Planning Periad TOTAL
1,615 Units
Implementation Program 1: Housing Units by Planning District
Encourage residential development in the following Planning districts, as provided below.
Residential development in these planning districts includes mixed-use, multi-unit residential, and
single-family residential at a density of 15-35 + units per acre. Adequate intì-astructure is
37
currently available to all districts. (Please see map on page 22 of this summary or page 73 of the
Technical Document. which identifies the location for the proposed units by Planning District.)
Time Frame: 2001-2006 (for ABAG estimate)
2007-2020 (for remainder of planning period)
City of Cupertino, Planning Department
Responsible Party:
Quantified Objective:
[Note: There was strong task force support for reducing the growth in residential dwelling units
to approximatelv 2400 dwelling units. and prohibiting mixed-use at the Crossroads. There are
two proposed approaches for doing this. The task force voting was split 55/45 in favor of
eliminating mixed-use development in Valleo North and South. The approach for eliminating all
residential growth in the Valleo areas plus the Crossroads. and reductions in Homestead are
reflected in the policv changes under Commercial Centers in Section 2 of the GP. The second
wproach of onlv eliminating mixed-use growth in the Crossroads and simplv limiting mixed-use
growth elsewhere is reflected here.1
Monta Vista 142 units at ~12 units per acre (11.8 acres)
Vallco Park South '700- ~units at up to 25'3-5 units per acre (;2B-2.-acres)
Heart of the City 6+9-443 units at up to 253'> units per acre (17.7 acres)
Homestead Road 'f1ß-493 units at up to 355G-_units per acre (14.1 acres)
City Center 495,\ units at 35 units per acre (14.1 acres)
North De Anza 3BB-ill..units at up to 25'3-5 units per acre (8.6acres)
Vallco Park North ~228 units at UP to 25'3-5 nnits per acre (8.7 acres)
Bubb Road 81 units at up to 20 units per acre (4.1 acres)
Undesignated +BB- ~units at ~20 units per acre (§-!2,lacres)
TOTAL 3,445 2337 units
Implementation Program 2: Land Use Designations
In order to allow for the number of units as identified in Program #1 (Housing Units by Planning
Districts), some parcels of land in the specified Planning Districts will need a change in land use
designation or zoning. The City will change land use designations/zoning to reflect the density
ranges necessary to implement Program 1.
Time Frame: 2003
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department
Quantified Objeeti. e:
N{J/ th DcAlItli Di,yt/ ict. Rc. ise zEJning 30 that all 8.57 aeres are ,enerl at a minimum ef 35 units
peraere-.
Homestead Dist/ ict. Pee. iso zsmng of 1.1 acres te 50 units !,er aere so tLat a total sf 12 acres are
zoned at 50 units !,cr aere.
Smith DcAlIta Dist/ iet. Pee .i3e zoniI,g so that 8.73 aercs arc zoned at a minimum of 15 units!,cr
aere-.
Implementation Program 3: Residential Potential Outside of Planning Districts
Include the existing inventory of residentially zoned parcels with residential potential that are
outside of the planning districts in addressing the Regional Housing Need.
Time Frame: 2001-2006 (for ABAG estimate)
2007-2020 (for remainder of planning period)
City of Cupertino, Planning Department
Responsible Party:
Quantified Objecti. e:
390 Units at <15 Units Per Acre, 300 Acres Tetal
511 Units at 15 20 Units Per Acre, 31 Acres Total
38
266 Units at 20 351 Units Per .'.cre, 12 "A.crcs Total
1,1'10 U.rits Total
Implementation Program 4: Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance
Assure that the Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance to encourage the production of more second
units on residential parcels.
Time Frame: 200 I: Evaluate and revise program if necessary [complete]
2001-2020: Continue to implement program
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department
Quantified Objective: 25 Second Units Produced, 2001-2006
GOAL B HOUSING THAT IS AFFORDABLE FOR A DIVERSITY OF CUPERTINO
HOUSEHOLDS
Policy 3-2: Housing Mitigation Plan
Assign priority to households who live or work in Cupertino for BMR units produced through the
plan or affordable housing units built with mitigation fees.
Implementation Program 5: Housing Mitigation Plan - Office and Industrial
Mitigation
The City will continue to implement the "Office and Industrial Mitigation" fee program. This
program requires that developers of office and industrial space pay a fee, which will then be used
to support affordable housing for families who work in Cupertino but live elsewhere. These fees
are collected and then deposited in the City's Affordable Housing Fund. The City will conduct an
updated "nexus' study to detennine whether the manner in which fees are calculated is still
appropriate.
Time Frame:
2002-2003 Conduct updated nexus study
2001-2006 Implement Mitigation Plan
City of Cupertino, Planning Department
Responsible Party:
Implementation Program 6: Housing Mitigation Plan: Residential Mitigation
The City will continue to implement the "Housing Mitigation" program. This program applies to
all new residential development of one unit or grater. Mitigation includes either the payment of an
in-lieu fee or the provision of a Below Market Rate (BMR) unit or units. Projects of 10 or more
units must provide on-site BMR units. Projects of 9 units or less can either build a unit or paying-
lieu fee. Implementation of the program shall include:
a) priority for occupancy to households who reside, work, attend school or have family in
Cupertino;
b) additional priority for households with wage earners who provide a public service; specifically,
employees of the City, local school district and public safety agencies;
c) utilize City's Affordable Rent Schedule as a guideline in setting rents for new affordable
housing;
d) update the rent schedule each year as new income guidelines are received and detennine a
unifonn method for allowing rent adjustments for affordable housing;
e) allow developers to meet all or a portion of their BMR requirement by making land available
for the City or a non-profit housing developer to construct affordable housing;
t) require BMR units to remain affordable for a minimum of99 years;
g) enforce the City's fIrSt right of refusal for BMR units, and require 15% BMR units
Time Frame:
Responsible Party:
Quantified Objective:
2001-2006 Implement Program
City of Cupertino, Planning Department
159 Very Low Income Units
39
159 Low Income Units
53 Median Income Units
53 Moderate Income Units
Implementation Program 7: Affordable Housing Fund
The City's Affordable Housing Fund provides financial assistance to affordable housing
developments. "Requests for Proposals" (RFPs) will be solicited from interested parties to
develop affordable units with housing funds. Affordable housing funds will be expended in the
following manner (ranked in order of priority):
a) Finance affordable housing projects in Cupertino.
b) Establish a down payment assistance plan that may be used in conjunction with the
BMR program or to make market rate units more affordable. The assistance should be in
the fonn oflow interest loans and not grants.
c) Establish a rental subsidy program to make market rate units more affordable.
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department
Quantified Objective: 40 Very Low Income Units
40 Low Income Units
Policy 3-3: Range of Housing Types.
Encourage the development of diverse housing stock that provides a range of housing types
(including smaller, moderate cost housing) and affordable levels. Emphasize the provision of
housing for lower and moderate income households and, also, households with wage earners who
provide service (e.g. school district employees, municipal and public safety employees, etc.)
Implementation Program 8: Mortgage Credit Certificate Program
Participate in the countywide Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) Program. This program
allocates mortgage credit certificates to first-time homebuyers to purchase housing. Due to the
high cost of housing units in Cupertino, it is estimated that most of the County's MCC' will be
used in the City of San Jose, where there are more low cost housing units available for sale.
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: Santa Clara County Mortgage Certificate Program
Quantified Objective: 1-2 Households Assisted Annually
Implementation Program 9: Move-In for Less Program
The Tri-County Apartment Association is managing this program, which recognizes the high cost
of securing rental housing. The program is geared to classroom teachers in public or private
schools who meet income criteria. Apartment owners/managers who agree to participate in the
program require no more than 20% of the monthly rent as a security deposit from qualified
teachers.
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: Tri-County Apartment Association and City of Cupertino
Implementation Program 10: Surplus Property for Housing
In conjunction with local public agencies, school districts and churches, the City will develop a
list of surplus property or underutilized property that have the potential for residential
development, compatible with surrounding densities. Additionally, long-tenn land leases of
property from churches, school districts corporations for construction of affordable units shall be
encouraged. Further, the feasibility of developing special housing for teachers or other employee
groups on the surplus properties will be evaluated. Teacher-assisted housing programs in
neighboring districts, such as Santa Clara United School district, will be reviewed for
applicability in Cupertino.
40
Time Frame: 2002-2203: Develop list of surplus properties and evaluate feasibility of
developing residential units on properties.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department
Implementation Program 11: Jobs/Housing Balance Program
Require major new office/industrial development to build housing as part of new development
projects. As part of the development review process, the City will evaluate the impact of any
application that will produce additional jobs in the community. The purpose of the evaluation is
to describe the impacts of the new jobs on the City's housing stock, especially in relation to the
jobs/housing ratio in the City. In 2001, .
ABAG's estimate of the City's job/housing ratio was 2.4 jobs to every household. The goal is to
reduce this ratio during the time frame of the Housing Element (2001-2006). Further, the City
will evaluate the feasibility of developing a policy and/or program that conditions approval of job
producing activities to housing productions.
Time Frame: 2002-2003: Develop procedure to evaluate job producing development
proposals. Evaluate feasibility of policy and/or program that ties new
job production to housing production.
2002-2206: hnplement
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning
Policy 3-4: Housing Rehabilitation.
Pursue and/or provide funding for the construction or rehabilitation of housing that is affordable
to very low, low and moderate-income households. Actively support and assist non-profit and for
profit developers in producing affordable units.
Implementation Program 12: Affordable Housing Information and Support
The City will provide infonnation, resources and support to developers who can produce
affordable housing. Infonnation will be updated on a regular basis in regard to available funding
sources and be distributed to all interested developers. In addition, infonnation regarding
additional City incentives such as the Density Bonus Program (see program #14) will also be
provided and updated on a regular basis. Further, the City will involve the public trom the
beginning of an affordable housing application so that there are fewer objections to the project as
it goes though the City approval process.
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department
Policy 3-5: Development of Affordable Housing.
Maintain and/or adopt appropriate land use regulations and other development tools to encourage
the development of affordable housing. Make every reasonable effort to disperse wits throughout
the community but not at the expense of undermining the fundamental goal of providing
affordable units.
Implementation Program 13: Density Bonus Program
The City's Density Bonus Program provides for a density bonus and additional concessions for
development of 6 or more units that provide affordable housing for families and seniors. Included
in the concessions are reduced parking standards, reduced open space requirements, reduced
setback requirements, and approval of mixed use zoning. The City will change the Ordinance
defmition of affordable unit to housing costs affordable at 30% of household income for very low
and low income
households.
Time Frame:
Responsible Party:
2003-2003 Change affordability definition
City of Cupertino, Planning Department
41
Implementation Program 14: Regulatory Incentives
The City will continue to waive park dedication and construction tax fees for all affordable units.
Parking standards will also be discounted for affordable developments. For mixed-use and higher
density residential developments, the Planning Commission or City Council may approve
deviations from the Parking Regulation Ordinance ofthe Cupertino Municipal Code, if the
applicant can provide a study supporting the deviation. Further, the City will continue to
efficiently process all development applications.
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department
Implementation Program 15: Residential and Mixed Use Opportunities In or
Near Employment Centers
The City will encourage mixed use development and the use of shared parking facilities in or near
employment centers. In addition to the development opportunities available through the "Heart of
the City" Specific Plan, the City will evaluate the possibility of allowing residential development
above existing parking areas except where mixed use is herein excluded. In specific, these areas
would be near or adjacent to employment centers and could provide additional opportunities for
housing.
Time Frame:
2002 - 2003 Evaluate parking opportunity sites
2002 - 2003 Evaluate incentives that may be offered
to encourage residential development in or near employment centers.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department
Policy 3-6: Tax Increment Funds.
Use a minimum of25% of tax increment funds generated from the Redevelopment Project Area
for housing activities that create affordable housing for lower and moderate income households.
Set aside 5% ofthe 25% for extremely low income housing.
Implementation Program 16: Redevelopment Housing Set Aside Fund
The City has established a Redevelopment Project Area, from which tax increments funds are
collected. A minimum of 25% of tax increment funds will be directed to low and moderate-
income households, 5% of which are directed to extremely-low income households. The
Redevelopment Agency will develop policies and objectives for the use of those funds. All
policies and objectives shall be developed to reflect the goals and objectives of the Housing
Element.
Time Frame:
Funds
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department
Policy 3-7: Housing Densities.
Provide a full range of ownership and rental housing unit densities, including apartments and
other high-density housing.
fmpkm""tatio" P. 0g;/.1f1l17. Co.n" sio., of COHlmCt cial Lallds 10 Rcsidclltial
Cemmereiall) designated laRd ma) be eoRsidcred for em"ersieR to residential ages ~here it docs
hot elimiRate e"istiRg el' poteRtial Reighborhood s"roiRg eommereial twes or eoRtradiet Heart of
the City policies.
Time Frame:
Resj3eRsiblc Part) :
2002-2003 Develop policies and objectives for use of Housing Set-Aside
2001 2006
City ef Cupcrtine, PlaRniRg Deþal'tmcat
fHlpl-cmwfttó'OI1 P'ogHim 18. RCS.j,oie.lli,¡[ De.dopme.1I Exeadi.lg .1faxiHIIlIIIS
A11o" reGidontial de.. elopmeRts te exceed plam,ed dORsit) maximums ifth,,) meet a special
comR.anit) seeial goal ßRd the increase ih dcnsit) " ill not eo erburden ncighberl.ood streets 01'
l.art neighborhood character.
'[iI,," Frame: 200HB%
42
~polo3ible Pmt): Cit) of CtlpertiHo. PIBmÜng Department
Implementation Program I9: Flexible Residential Standards
Allow flexible residential development standards in planned residential zoning districts, such as
smaller lot sizes, lot widths, floor area ratios and setbacks, particularly for higher density and
attached housing developments.
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department
GOAL C ENHANCED REStDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS
Policy 3-8: Maintenance and Repair.
Assist very low and low-income homeowners and rental property owners in maintaining and
repairing their housing units.
Implementation Program 20: Housing Rehabilitation
This program provides financial assistance to eligible very low and low-income
homeowners to rehabilitate their housing units. The County of Santa Clara, Housing and
Community Development (RCD), administers the program on behalf of the City of Cupertino.
When the City becomes an Entitlement Community in 2002-2003, housing rehabilitation
activities will continue to be funded.
Funding Source: CDBG Funds
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino and County of Santa Clara (HCD)
Quantified Objective: 5 Housing Units Rehabilitated Annually
Implementation Program 21: Home Access Program
The Home Access Program provides assistance with minor home repairs and accessibility
improvements for lower-income, disable households. Economic and Social Opportunities (ESO)
administers the program under a contract with the County of Santa Clara.
Funding Sources: Santa'Clara County Urban County CDBG Funds
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: ESO and County of Santa Clara (HCD)
Quantified Objective: 3-5 Households Assisted Annually
Implementation Program 22: Weatherization Program
This program assists very low-income homeowners with weatherization improvements to their
homes. Economic and Social Opportunities (ESO) administers the program in Cupertino and
other areas of the County. Funding Sources: State of California Energy Conservation Program
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: ESO
Quantified Objective: 3-5 Households Assisted Annually
Implementation Program 23: Apartment Acquisition and Rehabilitation
The County of Santa Clara administers Home and CDBG funds on behalf of the members of the
Urban County and HOME Consortium. The City of Cupertino participates in both the Urban
County and Consortium activities. Funds are available on a competitive basis to developers to
acquire and rehabilitate rental units for very low and low-income households. When the City
becomes an entitlement community in 2002-
2003, the City will continue to include the availability of HOME and CDBG fund for apartment
acquisition and/or rehabilitation.
Funding Source: HOME and CDBG Funds
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino
Policy 3-9: Conservation of Housing Stock
Conserve the existing stock of owner and rental housing units, which provide affordable housing
opportunities for lower and moderate income households
43
Implementation Program 24: Preservation of "At Risk Units"
The only affordable housing development at risk of converting to market rate is the Sunnyview
development. The expiration date of their federal subsidy is May 31, 2004. However, the
development is considered at low risk for converting because it is owned by a non-profit
organization, which has indicated that it will renew the assistance again in 2004. However, the
City will monitor the development and will initiate contact
in late 2003 with the owner and HUD to ensure that the units remain affordable.
Time Frame: 2003 Initiate contact with owner and HOD to detennine status of subsidy renewal.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department.
Quantified Objective: 100 units preserved as affordable housing.
Implementation Program 25: Condominium Conversions
The City's existing Condominium Conversion Ordinance regulates the conversion of rental units
in multi-family housing development in order to preserve the rental housing stock. Condominium
conversions are not allowed if the rental vacancy rate in Cupertino is less than 5% at the time of
the application for conversion and has averaged 5% over the past six months.
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department.
Quantified Objective: No conversions until vacancy rate threshold is
met.
Implementation Program 26: Rental Housing Preservation Program
The City's existing multi-family rental units provide housing opportunities for households of
varied income levels. The City will develop and adopt a program that includes the following
guidelines:
When a proposed development or redevelopment of a site would cause a loss of multi-
family rental housing, the City will grant approval only if at least two of the following
three circumstances exist:
-The project .. ill produce at lcast a I OO~;, increase in the Hanmer ehmits clinclA1) eH the I
~will comply with the City's BMR Program based on the actual number of new
units constl1leted. not the net number of units, and/or
- The number of rental units to be provided on the site is at least equal to the number of
existing renal units, and/or
- No less than 20% of the units will comply with the City's BMR Program.
Further, the preservation program will include a requirement for a tenant
relocation plan with provisions for relocation of tenants on site as much
as possible.
Time Frame:
2002-2003 Design Program
2002-2006 Implement Program
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department
Implementation Program 27: Conservation and Maintenance of Affordable
Housing
Develop a program to encourage the maintenance and rehabilitation of residential structures to
preserve the older, more affordable housing stock.
Time Frame: 2003-2004 Design Program
2004-2006 Implement Program
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department
Implementation Program 28: Neighborhood and Community Cleanup
Campaigns
Continue to encourage and sponsor neighborhood and community clean up campaigns for both
public and private properties.
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department
44
Policy 3-10: Energy Conservation.
Encourage energy conservation in all existing and new residential development.
Implementation Program 29: Energy Conservation Opportunities
The City will continue to enforce Title 24 requirements for energy conservation and will evaluate
utilizing some of the other suggestions as identified in the Environmental
Resources/Sustainability element.
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department
Implementation Program 30: Fee Waivers or Reduction for Energy Conservation
The City will evaluate the potential to waive or reduce fees for energy conservation
improvements to residential units (existing or new).
Time Frame: 2002-2003
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Planning Department
GOAL D SERVICES FOR SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSEHOLDS
Policy 3-11: Special Needs
Households.
Support organizations that provide services to special need households in the City,
such as homeless, elderly, disabled and single parent.
Implementation Program 31: Cupertino Community Services (Homeless Services)
Cupertino Community Services (CCS) manages transitional housing and administers the
"Continuum of Care" services for homeless, including the rotating shelter program. In
order to facilitate any future emergency shelter needs, the City will revise the Zoning Ordinance
to allow permanent emergency shelter facilities in "BQ" quasi-public zones and will promote and
encourage the location of permanent shelters in BQ zones.
Funding Sources: County of Santa Clara Urban County funds and Federal funds.
Time Frame: 2002-2003 Revise Zoning Ordinance to allow pennanent emergency
shelters in BQ zones.
Responsible Party:
Quantified Objective:
2001-2006 Continue to support services ofCCS to assist homeless
households.
Cupertino Community Services.
Transitional Housing for 12-24 households annually
Implementation Program 32: Project MATCH (Senior Shared Housing)
Project MATCH places seniors in housing arrangement with other persons interested in shared
housing. Project MATCH is funded with County of Santa Clara Urban County funds.
Funding Source: County of Santa Clara Urban County funds
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: Project MATCH
Quantified Objective: 5-10 Cupertino Households Placed Annually
Implementation Program 33: Catholic Social Services (Single Parents)
Catholic Social Services provides help to place single parents in shared housing situations. The
program in funded with Santa Clara County Urban County funds.
Funding Source: County of Santa Clara Urban County Funds Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: Catholic Social Services
GOAL E EQUAL ACCESS TO HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES
Policy 3-12: Housing Discrimination.
Support programs and organizations that seek to eliminate housing discrimination.
Implementation Program 34: Santa Clara County Fair Housing Consortium
45
The Santa Clara County Fair Housing Consortium includes the Asian Law Alliance, Mid-
Peninsula Citizens for Fair Housing, Project Sentinel and the Mental Health Advocates Program.
These organizations provide resources for Cupertino residents with tenant/landlord rental
mediation, housing discrimination and fair housing concerns. Administrative funding for these
organizations is partially contributed by County of
Santa Clara Urban County Funds.
Funding Source: County of Santa Clara Urban County Funds
Time Frame: 2001-2006
Responsible Party: Santa Clara County Fair Housing Consortium
Figure 3-F on the next page illustrates the location and number of units estimated by Planning
Area to accommodate the goals of Programs I and 2 on pages eight and nine of this document.
46
Section 4
Circulation
INTRODUCTION
4-1
The Circulation Element supports the Plan's guiding principles of building
community, mobility, and providing connectivity between neighborhoods. The
intent of this element is to balance the needs of pedestrians and bicyclists with
the requirements of drivers. The emphasis of this Plan on non-automotive
transportation is a change from previous General Plans. In the past, the City set
standards for performance of the highway system with less concern for
pedestrians and bicycles. The policies of this Plan may, in some cases, lead to a
reduced service level for auto traffic in order to accommodate pedestrians and
bicyclists.
The transportation system for Cupertino integrates
walkways, bicycle routes, transit service, local streets and
freeways into a single system that supports Cupertino
lifestyles. At the local level this includes providing
facilities that connect neighborhoods with pedestrian,
bicycle and automobile routes. Longer distance
connections are also needed to provide the links to major
arterial routes and the regional freeway system.
The Circulation Element briefly describes the
existing transportation system and local travel
characteristics. Non-motorized transportation modes are
studied and described in terms of alternatives to the
automobile. Projections of future traffic volumes based on the build out of the
land uses described in the Land Use Element are studied to ensure that traffic
congestion will not increase significantly.
Policies and implementation programs in this chapter provide a guide for
decisions regarding the circulation system improvements needed to
accommodate Cupertino's anticipated growth. In addition, this chapter takes into
account the traffic impact of anticipated regional development and the roadway
improvements adopted by regional agencies such as the Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Agency (VTA) and Metropolitan Transportation Commission
(MTC).
The Circulation Element is based on several underlying themes and
findings summarized below:
. Single-passenger automobiles have strained the inter-city transportation
system. The State Route (SR) 85 and Interstate Route 280 (1-280) freeways are
at or near to capacity during commute hours. This situation will only
worsen unless more people use transportation alternatives, such as bus and
rail transit, bicycling, ridesharing, walking and telecommuting. It is essential
~"/'.;"\t',, "
,~í\ '~
f ¡ ,¿(,'
~..'
lCITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
4-2
CIRCULATION
when approving new development to ensure that future growth does not
overwhelm the transportation system.
. Land use and transportation are inextricably connected. Future develop-
ment and circulation must be coordinated so that they will be in balance.
The land use and transportation policies in this Plan reflect this relationship.
. The need to provide efficient roadways for automobiles will be balanced
with the need to provide pedestrian and bicycle friendly roadways and
streetscapes.
. Transportation facilities should be accessible to all sectors of the community
including seniors, children, the disabled, persons with low-income, and
persons who depend on public transportation. City streets should be
available to all to drive, park, bicycle and walk, where safe and in accord
with traffic regulations.
. The provision of efficient routes for transit service, emergency and other
service vehicles continues to be a high priority for the City.
0 Tl:c impact of throagh traffic onto local streets sl:ould be minimized by
traffic calming to enhance the quality of residential neighborhoods.
. The design of the transportation system should incorporate aesthetic values
that complement the surrounding land uses.
. Future improvements to the circulation system must be consistent with and
support the other goals and policies of the General Plan.
. Traffic is both a local and a regional issue. Effective improvements to the
circulation system depend on the multi-jurisdictional cooperative effort of
multiple agencies such as the State of California (Caltrans), the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission (MTC), Santa Clara Valley Transportation
Authority (VTA), adjacent cities and counties, and other public transit
districts.
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
Cupertino's transportation cannot be planned without reference to the
regional and sub-regional planning that is conducted by others such as the VT A,
MTC and Caltrans.
The City participates with the VTA on the State mandated countywide
Congestion Management Plan (CMP). Longer range planning is provided in the
VTA's Valley Transportation Plan 2020 (VTP 2020). The VTP 2020 includes the
following projects or programs for Cupertino:
. The Mary Avenue Bicycle-Pedestrian Footbridge over 1-280.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
CIRCULATION
. The De Anza Trail on the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way Phase III.
. The study of the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) on Stevens Creek Boulevard.
. The study of Ught Rail Transit (LRT) in the Sunnyvale/Cupertino Corridor.
. The one major freeway improvement in the plan for Cupertino is an
improved ramp to connect SR 85 and 1-280 with Foothill Boulevard.
The regional projects are shown on Figure 4-A.
With the exception of the Mary Avenue bicycle-pedestrian footbridge the
above projects are considered part of a ten-year funding plan. The City should
work with the VTA to secure funding for each of the regional projects.
Regional land use decisions affect the operation of the freeway system in
Cupertino. Regional transportation facilities such as SR 85 and 1-280 currently
operate with considerable congestion in peak traffic hours. This is due in part to
a number of factors: more dependence on the automobile, suburban sprawl, few
mass transportation alternatives, the regional imbalance of jobs and housing in
Santa Oara County~. This Plan, as well as planning by the county and
regional agencies, advocates strategies to mitigate some of these negative factors
increasing housing ncar job sites.
.^.s describcd in the Land Use Element, Cuperti.-,o has rcspondcd to the jobs
hoMsing imbalance by adopting a l:oMsing plan that increases the hoMsing stock
above the nMmbcr of Mnits rcquired by the .^.ssociation of Bay ..\rea Coycrn
ments, while decreasing the potential for commercial! office dcyelopment.
The Light Rail network for Santa Clara County was conceived as a
traditional spoke-and-wheel network with the spokes radiating out from
downtown San Jose and wheel arcs ringing the Valley. Many portions of the
spokes and wheel arcs have been completed or are in the planning stages. The
West Valley portion of the County is planned to be served by the Vasona
Corridor leading to Campbell and eventually Los Gatos. There are no immediate
funding sources or definitive plans for either light rail or express buses to serve
Cupertino, Saratoga, Los Altos, west San Jose and the southern portion of
Sunnyvale.
There are four possible routes for mass transit to serve this portion of the
County including Highway 85 median and the Union Pacific Rail Right of Way
connecting to the Vasona Corridor at Vasona Junction in Los Gatos; Stevens
Creek Boulevard through San Jose and connecting to De Anza College at
Highway 85; and De Anza Boulevard connecting to the Stevens Creek line and
extending into Downtown Sunnyvale. Cupertino must advocate policies that
ensure that Cupertino residents, the major Cupertino corporations and De Anza,
West Valley and possibly Foothill Colleges are served by mass transit within the
next 20 years.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
4-3
SEE POLICY 2-24 IN
TIlE LAND USE
ELEMENT.
~
-(/lL '.;;
~
4-4
CIRCULATION
(Insert Figure 4-A VTA Projects here)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
CIRCULATION
4-5
GOALA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DECISIONS THAT SUPPORT
AND COMPLEMENT TJfE NEEDS OF CUPERTINO
Policy 4-1: City Participation in Regional Transportation Planning
Participate actively in developing regional approaches to meeting the
transportation needs of the residents of the Santa Oara Valley. Work
closely with neighboring jurisdictions and agencies responsible for
roadways, transit facilities and transit services in Cupertino.
Strategies
1.
Regional Transportation Planning. Participate in regional transportation
plaIUÚng in order to minimize adverse impacts on Cupertino's circulation
system. Work with all regional transportation agencies to develop
programs consistent with the goals and policies of Cupertino's General
Plan. Work with neighboring cities to address regional transportation and
land use issues of mutual interest.
2.
Jobs - Housing Balance. Minimize regional traffic impacts on Cupertino
by supporting regional plaIUÚng programs to manage the jobs-housing
balance throughout Santa Clara County and the Silicon Valley.
Interchange Improvements. Identify potential interchange improve-
ments, such as 1-280 with the Lawrence Expressway and Stevens Creek
Boulevard, that would encourage the use of the freeway and reduce the
use of local streets.
3.
4.
Congestion Management Plan (CMP). Actively participate in the
preparation of the CMP and other regional efforts to control traffic
congestion and limit air pollution.
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). Require TIA reports. that meet the
requirements of the VTA for all developments projected to generate more
than 100 trips in the morning or afternoon peak hour.
5.
6.
Multi-modal Transportation. Ensure that connections are provided to
enable travelers to transition from one mode of transportation to another,
e.g., bicycle to bus.
Regional Bus and Rapid Transit Service. Support the expansion of the
VTA's regional bus transit system and extension of bus and/or light rail
rapid transit into the Stevens Creek and De Anza Corridors to fulfill the
"spoke and wheeY' transit system designed to serve all of Santa Clara
County. Specific actions to implement this strategy are:
7.
. Review all right-of-way improvement projects for pctential opportunities
and constraints to rapid transit development.
. Encourage higher density and mixed-use development in rapid transit
corridors and ensure developments are designed to enhance the use of
transit.
~
'at \:;
~
CITy OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
4-6
CiRCULATION
. Ensure that the design for the Downtown Village will accommodate alod
support bus or rail rapid transit services as proposed ho the VTP 2020.
. Seek the cooperative support of residents, property owners and businesses
in planning rapid transit extensions.
. Actively seek to have Cupertino represent West Valley cities and ultimately
chair the VTA Board of Directors to promote the above policy.
ENCOURAGING ALTERNATIVES TO THE AUTOMOBILE
Alternatives to the automobile contribute to energy conservation, reduce air
and water pollution and the cost of building and maintaining additional
highways and roads. Ideally, sufficient alternatives means of transportation
should exist so that use of the automobile is a choice not a necessity. Alternatives
include public transit, carpools, flexible work hours, bicycling, walking and
telecommuting. These alternative forms of transportation must be coordinated
with land use patterns that support them.
GOAL B INCREASED USE OF PUBLIC TRANSIT, CARPOOLS, BICYCLING,
WALKING AND TELECOMMUTING
Measures to manage travel demand, called Transportation Systems
Management (TSM), are directed at reducing the number of single-occupant
vehicles (SaVs) using the circulation system during peak hour commute periods.
sov trips represent about half of all the daily trips generated in Cupertino.
Policy 4-2: Reduced Reliance on the Use of Single-Occupant Vehicles
Promote a general decrease in reliance on private mostly single-occupant
vehicles (SOV) by encouraging attractive alternatives.
Strategies
2.
Alternatives to the SOV. Encourage the use of alternatives to the SOY
including increased car-pooling, use of public transit, bicycling and
walking.
TSM Programs. Encourage TSM programs for employees in both the
public and private sectors by including preferred parking for carpools,
providing bus passes, encouraging compressed workweeks, and
providing incentives and rewards for bicycling and walking.
1.
3.
Telecommuting, Teleconferencing and Other Electronic Communica-
tion. Encourage employers to use the internet to reduce commute travel.
Encourage schools, particularly at the college and high school level, to
make maximmn use of the internet to limit the need to travel to and from
the campus.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
CIRCULATION
4-7
4.
Design of New Developments. Encourage new commercial develop-
ments to provide shared office facilities, cafeterias, day-care facilities,
lunchrooms, showers, bicycle parking, home offices, shuttle buses to
transit facilities and other amenities that encourage the use of transit,
bicycling, walking or telecommuting as commute modes to work.
Provide pedestrian pathways and orient buildings to the street to
encourage pedestrian activity.
5.
Street Space for Alternative Transportation. Provide space on
appropriate streets for bus turnouts, Q!...safe and accessible bike lanesaHà
Q!: pedestrian paths.
6.
Alternative Transportation Information. Use the Cupertino Scene and
other media to provide educational material on alternatives to the SOY.
7.
Citizen Participation. Continue to work with the City Bicycle/Pedestrian
Advisory Committee, community groups and residents to ellininate
hazards and barriers to bicycle and pedestrian transportation.
PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLES
Cupertino is an auto-oriented, suburban city developed during the 1950s
and 1960s. Local streets provide limited service to other transportation modes.
As would be expected in a City designed with the auto in mind, walking and
bicycle riding currently represent just 7% of all trips generated in Cupertino.
The land use policies of this Plan are intended to locate trip generators and
attractors closer together and thus promote walking and bicycle use. In addition,
the weather and terrain make Cupertino an ideal location to develop pedestrian
and bicycle modes of transportation.
GOAL C A COMPREHENSIVE NETWORK OF PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ROUTES
AND FACIUTIES
Policy 4-3: Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Guidelines and the Cupertirw
Bicycle Transportation Plan.
Implement the programs and projects recommended in the Cupertino
Pedestrian Transportation Guidelines and in the Cupertino Bicycle
Transportation Plan, as well as other programs that promote this goal.
Strategies
1.
The Pedestrian Guidelines. Implement the projects recommended in the
Pedestrian Guidelines including:
. After engineering review, and where found to be feasible, improve safety at
selected intersections by one or more of the following: prohibit right-turn-
~
-{¿t ~,
~
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
4-8
I 2.
CIRCULATION
-~~~
on-red, add time to the pedestrian signal phase, construct a median and/ or
reduce corner radii.
. Where feasible provide missing sidewalks on arterial and collector streets
and on neighborhood streets as desired by residents.
. Identify a citywide pedestrian circulation grid including shortcuts, path-
ways and bridges where needed to close gaps in the pedestrian circulation
system.
Pedestrian Grid. Develop Consider developing a quarter-mile grid of
safe, walk-able sidewalks and paths to provide pedestrian access among
residential, shopping, recreation and business locations.
3.
Safe Routes to School. Work with the School Districts to promote the Safe
Route to Schools program.
4.
Pedestrian Time on Traffic Signals. With engineering review, provide
additional time for pedestrians to cross streets at appropriate
intersections. Added time would be most appropriate near shopping
districts, schools and senior citizen developments. This strategy should be
considered even if it could reduce the Level of Service (LOS) for
automobile traffic. Traffic signal walk time adjustments are further
described in Policy 4-6. [the last sentence was not specifically voted on,
but it should be deleted if Policy 4-6 is deleted.]
5.
Redueed Street Width.Pedestrian Improvements. To enhGncc o.'{alking,
cO1~Gidcr reducing the number of though traffic IGnes on streets with fC>IH
or more lm:es where feasible Gnd GppropriGte. Traffic lanes could be
cono/erted to parking lanes, widened side"",alks or G median. Where a
median is provided it should be wide enough to safely accommodate
pedestrians. Streets such as Homestead, Bollinger, Rainbow, Prospect or
Stelling should be evaluated for potential improvements for pedestrians.
Consider reducing residential street widths to promote slower traffic and
less pervious surface.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
CIRCULATION
4-9
6.
Crosswalk Marking. Medians, and "Chokers." Following engineering
review, mark crosswalks with pavement treatment scaled to the speed of
traffic,~!lse medians and "chokers" to narrow the width of the street
where feasible and appropriate.
7.
PedestriarýBicycle Impact Statement (PBIS). Ret¡ffireEncourage that all
public construction and private development projects submit a PBIS. For
projects that require a TIA, the PBIS may be incorporated into the TIA.
The impact of the project on pedestrians and bicycles shall be reported in
terms of safety, route connectivity, loss of existing facilities, adequacy of
proposed facilities, and potential adverse impact of proposed
pedestrian/bicycle programs on automobile traffic and vice versa.
8.
Implementation of the Bicycle Plan. Implement the Bikeway Network as
recommended in the Bicycle Plan. The Network is shown in Figure 4-B.
9.
Bicycle Facilities in New Developments. Encourage the developers of
major new or remodeled buildings to include secure interior and/ or fully
weather protected bicycle parking.
10. Traffic Calming on Bicycle Routes. Where feasible and appropriate,
implement traffic calming on those bicycle routes where automobile
traffic volumes are low. Bicycle traffic flows best where automobile traffic
volume and speeds are low and where there are no stop signs or traffic
signals to hinder through traffic flow.
11. Bicycle Parking. Provide bicycle parking in multi-family residential
developments and in commercial districts as required under Section
19.100.040 of the City code. CoRsider amending the eo de to tic the sic) cle
parkir.g requirement directly to the size of each deYclopment rather than
as percentage of the automobile parking requirement, as is now the case.
PUBLIC TRANSIT
The City of Cupertino does not operate any public transit services. The VTA
operates nine regular and three express bus routes serving 128 bus stops in
Cupertino. The Stevens Creek Corridor is served at 15-minute headways on
weekdays and 30 minute headways in the evening and weekends. Most other
arterials are served at 20 to 30 minute headways on weekdays. There is service
on most routes into evening hours and on weekends, typically at 30-to 6O-minute
headways.
There are two important transit transfer points in Cupertino-De Anza
College and Vallco Park. The VTA plans to build a full-service transit station at
the College. Transfers at Vallco are currently made on the street and are,
therefore, not as convenient as desirable.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
.~
~;")
4-10
CIRCULATION
Ridership on VTA buses in Cupertino is about 3,500 patrons per weekday.
Transit ridership, including the use of the VTA and school buses, represents
about 1.5% of total trips generated on a weekday in Cupertino.
GOAL D INCREASED USE OF EXISTING PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE AND THE
DEVELOPMENT OF NEW RAPID TRANSIT SERVICE
Policy 4-4: Increased Use of Public Transit Use
Support and encourage the increased use of public transit.
Strategies
1.
Transit Facilities in New Developments. Ensure all new development
projects include amenities to support public transit such as: bus stop
shelters; space for transit vehieles to stop and maneuver as needed;
transit maps and schedules. Encourage commercial and institutional
developments to support bus passes for employees.
2.
TL'. Trans-it .A.nalysis. Require project II.'\. reports to ¡",clade (110 analysis
of how public transit would seryc the proposed de'lCIDpment and the
impact of the development 010 transit operatiO1os.
3.
Transit Stop Amenities. Work with the VTA and adjacent property
owners to provide attractive amenities such as seating, lighting and
signage at all bus stops.
4.
Vallco Park Transit Station. Work with the VTA to study and develop a
transit transfer station at Valleo Park. Anticipate a multi-modal station
that serves future light rail.
5.
Traffie Si¡;aal Preemption. Study signal prccmptiO1o for buses Dn City
arterials. ImprD'lC siglOal timing to fa'o'Df public transit where '...arranted.
L6,---Rapid Transit. Work with the VTA to plan for and develop bus
and/ or light rail rapid transit services in the Stevens Creek and north
De Anza Corridors to take advantage of the potential increase in
mixed-use activities in the Downtown Village and the De Anza College
customer base. Consider increased frequency of service to encourage
ridership.
7. Shuttle Service. Study the possibility of providing- shuttle service to
kev commercial, office and instihltionallocations in Cupertino.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
CIRCULATION
4-11
(Insert Figure 4-B Bikeways fold-out here)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
~.. ';"\ . ..
-í'i\ "-.
l L/ .,(/
~
4-12
CIRCULATION
(back of 4-B Bikeways fold-out)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
CIRCULATION
4-13
ROADWAYS
Most trips in Cupertino, nearly 92% of all trips, are made by private vehicle
on the public street and highway system. The Cupertino system of major streets
is shown in Figure 4-c. Local and residential streets are not shown. The major
street system includes:
. State freeways SR 85 and 1-280.
. Arterials such as De Anza and Stevens Creek Boulevards and Homestead
and Wolfe Roads.
. Major collectors such as Foothill Boulevard and Stelling Road north of
Stevens Creek Boulevard, Prospect Road east of De Anza and Miller
Avenue.
. Minor collectors such as the remainder of Foothill and Stelling along with
Bubb, Blaney, Tantau, McOellan, Bollinger and Rainbow.
The quality of the operation of the street system is measured using a system
known as Level of Service (LOS). Traffic engineers and planners use level of
service grades to evaluate the relative congestion of roads and highways. The
LOS for roadways is a scale that measures the amount of traffic a roadway or an
intersection may be capable of handling. Level of service" A" represents free
flow conditions and level of service "F" represents jammed conditions with
excessive delay for motorists. The definition of LOS is shown in Table 4-1.
Table 4-1. Level Of Service Definitions For Signalized Intersections.
Level of Vehicle Delay Description
Service (Seconds)
A 0-5.0 Free flow, no congestion (very little delay)
B 5.1 - 15.0 Stable flow, limited congestion (slight delay)
C 15.1 - 25.0 Stable flow, mDderate congestion (acceptable delay)
0 25.1- 40.0 Approaching unstable flow, high congestion (tolerable
delay)
E 40.1- 60.0 Unstable flow, near breakdown (typically unacceptable
delay)
F >60.0 Forced flow, breakdown (excessive delay)
It is the intent of this Plan that most streets should operate with no more
than a tolerable level of congestion, LOS D. E)(ceptions to this standmd in the
Downtown Village ::md at other locations to ensure pedestrians me well sef'led at
intersectiO1:S CHe ÒscusGed below.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFf GENERAL PLAN
~..:.
-í1't '~
~~..
4-14
CIRCULATION
The concept of maintaining no worse than a tolerable level of congestion is
important, not only to provide a reasonable LOS for motorists, but also to protect
neighborhoods from the impact of excessive through traffic. To the extent that
the arterial and major collector street system is operating with limited
congestion, there will be less incentive for drivers to use local streets to bypass
areas of congestion.
Cupertino uses a computerized traffic signal interconnect system to increase
the traffic carrying capacity of arterial streets. The system controls the flow at
intersections to favor commute traffic. Green lights are longer on major streets to
encourage shoppers, commuters and workers to use those streets.
These policies encourage drivers to use the arterial street system. Cupertino
discourages motorists from other cities from using local streets, and where
appropriate from using collector streets, by means of stop signs, speed humps,
raised medians, diverters and intensified enforcement of speed limits.
GOAL E ROADWAY DESIGN THAT ACCOUNTS FOR THE NEEDS OF MOTORISTS,
PEDESTRIANS, BICYCLES AND ADJACENT LAND USE
Policy 4-5: Traffic Service and Land Use Development
Maintain a minimum LOS D for major intersections during the morning
and afternoon peak traffic hours. Achieve this standard by imposing
reasonable limits on land use to ensure that principal thoroughfares are
not unduly impacted by locally generated traffic at peak traffic hour.
In order to accommodate development that furthers a unique gathering
place in the Crossroads area on Stevens Creek Boulevard, set the LOS
standard for the intersections of Stevens Creek Boulevard with De Anza
Boulevard and with Stelling Road to LOS E+. (No more than an average
45 seconds of delay per vehicle). The standard for the intersection of De
Anza Boulevard at Bollinger Road shall also be LOS E+.
LOS standards may also be adjusted as described in Policy 4-7.
Strategies
1. 1. Street Width Limitation. To minimize the barrier effect and the
- negative aesthetics of major streets, limit the mid-block width of De Anza
Boulevard to eight lanes and claluate reduction of lanes in thc acid block
arc as of Stcvcns Crcck Boulc'¡ard. Thc c'iClluation will assess impacts on
Level of Servicc and safety.
2. Svnchronization of Traffic Signals.
h'affic signals on maior streets..
Enhance the synchronization of
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
(Insert Figure 4-C Circulation here)
CIRCULATION
4-15
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
-~
4-16
CIRCULATION
2.
Allocation of Non-residential Development. In order to maintain a
desired level of transportation system capacity, the city's remaining non-
residential development potential shall be pooled and reallocated
according to the city's development priority tables as shown in the Land
Use Element of this Plan. Floor areas ratio (FAR) limitations apply to all
remaining commercial, office and industrial properties, unless a property
received a bonus FAR credit authorization by the 1993 General Plan
and/ or a higher development allocation, above the FAR limitation,
approved by the City.
3.
Citywide Transportation Improvement Plan. Carry out a citywide
transportation improvement plan to accommodate peak hour traffic flows
on arterial streets and major collector streets at a minimum of LOS D. 1£
feasible, the Plan should maintain the LOS higher than level D. However,
as described above, exceptions to this standard are set for the
intersections of Stevens Creek Boulevard with De Anza Boulevard and
with Stelling Road and for the intersection of De Anza Boulevard at
Bollinger Road.
4.
Annual LOS Analysis. Conduct a LOS analysis, consistent with the
reporting requirements of the VTA, to be completed at the time of the
annual General Plan review.
Policy 1 6: Traffie Se¡-vice and Pedest1'ian Jlløeds
BalalOC€ thc nCCL:S of pcdcstrians '.dth desired traffic ser¡ice. 'Nloc1'e
necessary mOL: appropriate, alia's a lowered LOS standard to better
accommodate pedestrians on major streets and at specific notersections.
Strategies
1.
Traffic Signal Walk Times. This strategy is described iT: Policy 1 3.
:\dded time on walle signals '.'muld be most appropriate near sHopping
diotricts, scHools and senior citizen developments.
Reduced Street Width. This strategy is described in Policy 1 3. Study the
impact of the reL:uetion of tra'le!lanes on traffic LOS. Reduce the width of
streets only after a case by case study where ser'lice leve!s would not be
degraded below leye! K. (15 secoflds of average delay per vehicle).
Policy 4-7: Roadway Plans that Complement the Needs of Adjacent Land Use
2.
Design roadways based on efficient alignments, appropriate number and
widths of traffic lanes, inclusion of medians, parking and bicycle lanes
and the suitable width and location of sidewalks as needed to support the
adjacent properties.
In addition, design the local streets to satisfy the aesthetic requirements of
the area served. In general, the aesthetics of a street will be improved if it
can be narrower rather than wider, include significant landscaping with
shade trees, and provide safe and convenient places for people to bicycle
and walk. Details of design, such as provision of vertical curbs and
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
CIRCULATION
minimum corner raclli, are to be considered desirable. Design details
should be developed in the City's road improvement standards.
Strategies
1.
Road Improvement Standards. Develop the City's road improvement
standards to include consideration of service to traffic, bicycles and
pedestrians as well as the embodiment of aesthetically pleasing design
features. like trees. Improvement standards shall also consider the urban,
suburban and rural environments found within the City.
Rural Road Improvement Standards. Identify candidate rural roads and
develop specific street improvement standards that preserve the rural
character of these streets. Rural roads would typically feature natural
landscaping, no sidewalks and narrow unpaved shoulders.
2.
3.
Semi-Rural Road Improvement Standards. Identify candidate semi-rural
roads where curb and gutter improvements, and no sidewalks, are
appropriate.
4.
Urban Road Improvement Standards. Develop urban improvement
standards for arterials such as Stevens Creek and De Anza Boulevards. In
these areas, standards may include wide sidewalks with appropriate
street furniture and 01: street parking.
5.
Suburban Road Improvement Standards. Develop suburban road
improvement standards for all streets not designated as rural, semi-rural
nor in the Crossroads Area.
6.
Intersection Design. Survey intersections to ensure that the roadway
alignments are as efficient as possible. Where feasible and appropriate,
redesign and rebuild those intersections where improvements would
upgrade traffic flow and pedestrian and bicycle convenience and safety.
Too many driveways may impede traffic flow on busy streets because
drivers can indiscriminately enter the travel lanes at multiple locations.
Landscaping themes along the street frontage maintain a stronger visual
continuity with fewer curb cuts service to traffic while also improving service for
bicyclists and pedestrians.
Policy 4-8: Curb Cuts
Minimize the number of dIiveway openings in eaeh development.
Strategies
1. Shared Driveway Access. Encourage property owners 1=.' 1
to use shared driveway access and interconnected I .
roads on specific properties where feasible. Require: . i
driveway access closures, consolidations or both when
a non-residential site is remodeled. Ensure that the _I n..
driveway accommodates the traffic volume for all 1
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFf GENERAL PLAN
4-17
-~
(I.L //
~
4-18
CIRCULATION
2.
affected properties, and that the maintenance responsibilities are clearly
defined.
Direct Access from Secondary Streets. lWlimHH~
;~~o~:;;~d~:;~:7et;t~p;~~~à~g~~~~ :~l~~ J r~UJ:
to driveways from the secondary street. ~~
Temporary Curb Cuts On Non-Residential Sites. Permit temporary curb
cuts on a non-residential site subject to the City finding that the opening
is necessary for public safety. These temporary openings may be closed
and access to the driveway made available from other driveways when
surrounding properties are developed or redeveloped.
3.
Policy 4-9: Street Improvement Planning
Plan street improvements such as curb cuts, sidewalks, bus stop turnouts,
bus shelters, light poles, benches and trash containers as an integral part
of a project to ensure an enhanced streetscape and the safe movement of
people and vehicles with the least possible disruption to the streetscape.
Strategies
1.
Sidewalk Access to Parking or Buildings. Examine sidewalk to parking
areas or building frontages at the time individual sites develop to
regulate the entry to the site at a central point. Sidewalks in the
Crossroads Area shall be wide enough to accommodate increased
pedestrian activity.
Bus Stop Turnouts in Street Frontages. Require bus stop turnouts, or
partial turnouts, within the street frontage of a new or redeveloping site.
This policy does not apply to the Downtown Village Special Planning
Area. Bus stops should include benches, trash receptacles and other
amenities as appropriate. Follow the VTA specifications for improving
bus stops.
2.
Policy 4-10: Safe Parking Lots
Require parking lots that are safe for pedestrians.
Strategy
Safe Spaces for Pedestrians. Require parking lot design and construction
to include clearly defined spaces for pedestrians so that foot traffic is
separated from the hazards of car traffic and people are directed from
their cars to building entries.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTION
CIRCULATION
4-19
Tñrough traffic tends to take the route of least resistance, often resulting
in a high through volume of traffic along residential streets located adjacent to
busy traffic corridors. It is csscdial that tIhrough traffic on local streets should I
be discouraged to protect the quality of life and safety of residential
neighborhoods.
Neighborhood traffic management is based on the concept that commute
or through traffic should be redirected from local residential and minor collector
streets and onto major arterials, expressways or freeways. Neighborhood traffic
management programs may include any of the traffic calming measures listed
below.
GOAL F A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT HAS MINIMAL ADVERSE IMPACT ON
RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS
Policy 4-11 Good Traffic Service on Major Streets
Encourage through traffic to use the major arterial and collector streets by
maintaining the highest service possible on the arterial street system.
Policy 4-12 Traffic Calming on Local Streets
Discourage traffic from using local neighborhood streets by employing
traffic calming measures.
Strategies
1.
Traffic Calming Measures. After engi-
neering study, implement appropriate
traffic calming measures and/ or im-
provements on a case-by-case basis,
based on approval of 60% of the
residents on the street and involving
public hearings, to slow or discourage
through traffic in neighborhoods. Re-
quire new development to implement
traffic calming measures if impacts are
generated by the development.
Design of Traffic Calming Measures.
Consider the importance of attractive
designs for traffic calming installations.
Develop written design standards for
each type of measure.
2.
Neighborhood Traffic Management Plans. Develop traffic management
plans for neighborhoods local residential streets affected by unacceptable
levels of through traffic. Plans may include the traffic calming measures,
3.
~
-ILl L ¿)
~'
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
4-20
SEE POLICIES 6-67
AND 6-68 IN
HEALTH AND
SAFETY FOR
ADDlTlONAL TRUCK
TRAFFIC POLICIES
CIRCULATION
including medians and street trees, and also include education and
enforcement measures that promote changes in driver behavior.
Policy 4-13: Limited Street Closures
Do not close streets unless there is a demonstrated safety or over-
whelming through traffic problem and there are no acceptable
alternatives. Closures may shift traffic to other local streets, thus moving
the problem from one neighborhood to another.
Policy 4-14: School Impacts on Neighborhoods
Minimize the impact of school drop-off, pick-up and parking on
neighborhoods.
Strategy
Coordination with School Districts. Work with the School Districts to
develop plans and programs that encourage car/van-pooling, stagger
hours of adjacent schools, drop-off locations. encourage walking and
bicycling to school. Assist Districts in the development of the "Safe
Routes to School Program" to encourage more students walking and
bicycling and less use of auto access.
Policy 4-15: Transportation Noise, Fumes and Hazards
In addition to limiting through traffic volume on local streets, protect the
community from noise, fumes and hazards caused by the City's
transportation system. The quarries on Stevens Canyon Road, Stevens
Creek Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard are major sources of
transportation noise.
Strategies
1.
Quarry Use Permit. Monitor the quarries' use permit conditions imposed
by the County of Santa Clara and oppose any expansion of quarry uses.
2.
Quarry Truck Speed. Prioritize enforcement of traffic speeds on Stevens
Canyon, Stevens Creek and Foothill Boulevards. Install radar speed
monitors.
3.
Community Protection. Work to protect the community from the effects
of the transportation system. Discourage dangerous and abusive driving
by priority enforcement of speed laws, enforcement of State muffler laws
(see the Noise element of this Plan) and review of traffic management
strategies.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
CIRCULATION
4-21
TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS
The City uses the VTA maintained CMF model to project traffic on the
freeway and on local streets. The CMF model has about 18,500 highway and
transit links, and 385 internal zones to represent Santa Oara County. The land
use projections for Cupertino in 2020 have been developed by the city planning
staff. The land use data for areas outside Cupertino are based on ABAG
Projections. The model is calibrated by comparing its estimate of traffic flow in
2000 against traffic counts conducted on the city street system. When the model
closely replicates existing traffic, it is used to project traffic volumes for the year
2020.
FUTURE YEAR TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
As shown in Table 4-2, the traffic volumes projected using the CMF model
for the year 2020 would result in some increased levels of congestion. However,
the 2020 LOS for major intersections would meet the standards set in this Plan
and the standards as required by the CMP.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
-W\,
~
4-24
CiRCULATION
(Insert Figure 4-E Traffic Volumes here)
CiTY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
Section 5
Environmental
Resou rces/S ustai nabi I ity
INTRODUCTION
Sustainable planning and development accommodate the City's future
changes while recognizing that the community's environmental resources
are fragile, invaluable and interrelated. Sustainable planning integrates and
balances environmental decisions with economic considerations and rec-
ognizes the symbiotic relationship between the natural environment, the
Community and the economy. In the long term, protecting and sustaining
the City's viable ecological cornmunities and environmental resources will
result in the protection of both the human and natural environments.
PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABILITY
5-1
Planning for the location of land use activities is one
of the fundamental components of sustainability. Suburban
land use practices isolate housing, retail uses and
employment locations from one another, and scatter low-
density development that becomes solely reliant on the
automobile for access and transportation. This inefficient
and unsustainable growth pattern has resulted in loss of
natural habitat and open space, deteriorating air and water
quality, increased traffic congestion and a loss of a sense of
community. Sustainability requires a change from past
land use planning to a system that creates and maintains competent and
efficient community facilities, human scale neighborhoods and a sense of
community while preserving environmental resources.
The Environmental Resources/Sustainability element contains an in-
ventory of the City's key environmental issues and resources, and it also
includes policies for the efficient use and conservation of these resources,
based on the following principles:
Sustainability Principles
The Environmental Resources/Sustainability Element and implemen-
tation strategies are based upon the following fundamental principles:
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
~!:
Yli "-
-o~4'
5-2
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCESjSUSTAINABILITY
. Linking - the linking of Resource Management and Economic Deter-
minations when evaluating development projects
. ConservatiO1ýEfficiency - the protection, intelligent use and reuse of
renewable and nonrenewable resources
. Reduction of Waste - reuse, recycling and use reduction
. Resource Management for the benefit of future generations
. PreventionjMitigation of significant envirorunental impacts
. Restoration of impacted environmental resources
. Innovation in building technologies, including the substitution of ma-
terials
. Community Participation - the comprehensive involvement of City
goverrunent, city residents and the private sector
. Education - preparation and dissemination of educational materials
The City's sustainable, envirorunental resource program is based on
the perception of the community as a holistic system, where people are in-
escapably related to the community's natural resources and other envi-
rorunental conditions. These conditions not only include topography, air
and water quality, surface drainage, and open space, but all other forms of
life.
GOAL A
A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE FOR THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
Policy 5-1: Principles of Sustainability
Incorporate the principles of sustainability into Cupertino's plan-
ning and development system.
Strategies
1. Appoint a Task Force or Commission to develop an appropriate
comprehensive annual Sustainability and Resource Plan for the City.
The mission for the Task Force I Commission would be:
a. write and keep current the annual Tactical Plan and meas-
urement of City-wide programs to help achieve the Environ-
mental Resources and Sustainability section of the General
Plan.
b. Identify and evaluate resources, technologies, products and
the life-cycle cost of ownership for each recommended.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
Overall energy use in
the Bay Area
Use
Commercial
Residential
Industrial
Transportation
Other
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES(SUSTAINABILITY
Co Work with City staff to evaluate the financial feasibility of the
recommendations.
LImplementation Programs. Adopt and implement energy policies
and implementation programs that include the City's planning and
regulatory process.
City-Wide Inventory. Conduct a City-wide sustainability inventory
in OTder to identify issues, opportunities and planning alternatives.
4.3. Sustainability Energy and Water Conservation Plan. Prepare and
implement a comprehensive sustainability energy plan as a part of the
City's General Plan. This plan will specifically include recommenda-
tions regarding:
:2.
a. Reduction of energy consumption.
b. Reduction of fossil fuels.
c. Use of renewable energy resources whenever possible.
d. Improve City-wide water usage and conservancy.
e. Reduce water consum)Jtion by the City.
f. Promote residential and business water reduction.
The Task Force/Conunissibn will work with Staff to keep the Sustain-
ability Energy and Water Conservation )Jortion of the General Plan cur-
rent and abreast of beneficial cost-effective technolo¡;ies.
Energy Conservation/Efficiency
Cupertino reliance on the use of non-renewable energy supplies has
serious environmental consequences. For our community to be sustainable,
it must reverse this situation.
The City of Cupertino receives electrical power from Pacific Gas and
Electric (PG&E). PG&E's power is derived from several sources such as
wind turbines, hydroelectric dams and nuclear generation. The Asso-
ciation of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) power consortium pro-
vides the City with natural gas. In the State of California and the San
Francisco Bay Area, approximately 95 percent of the residential units
are heated by natural gas, the remainder by electricity and propane.
Since the severe energy shortages of the 1970's, which culnù-
nated in the critical statewide electrical power shortages of 2001,
Califomians (and particularly Bay Area residents) have become,
5-3
%
7
~~;~~
31"7J
:.10 <,
"...~"..,i;",;';
100
Sources: PG&E, Planning
Resource Associates
5-4
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
acutely aware of the need to reduce energy demand for both the short and
!IOng term in order to achieve a sustainable future. This was further rein-
forced by the severe blackouts in the Northeast U.s. and Canada in the
summer of 2003. The continuously rising cost of energy production, to-
gether with diminishing fossil fuel sources (non-renewable resources), has
required public agencies to conserve, efficiently use and search for alterna-
tive energy resources.
PLANNING AND REGULATORY PROCESSES
Urban areas in California, (including Cupertino) contain approxi-
mately 85 percent of the State of California's population. These urban
communities are in the best position, through their planning and regula-
tory processes to promote and implement effective energy conserva-
tion/ efficiency sustainability programs. Cupertino has expressed its
commitment to these programs in the following ways:
. Installed lighting and/ or retrofitted energy efficient lights for all street
lights and traffic control lights.
. Retrofitted all overhead lights in City Offices.
. Reduced lighting and equipment use where possible in all City facili-
ties through staff training.
. Acquired several electric vehicles.
. Distributed conservation/ efficiency information to architects, contrac-
tors and the general public.
. Endorsed the "Draft Compact for a Sustainable Bay Area" as pro-
moted by the Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development. This
"Compact" constitutes a commitment to take specific steps toward a
sustainable region.
The Land Use Element and the Circulation Element commit to sus-
tainability in the following areas:
Land Use Planning and Zoning: Provide energy efficient higher
density housing in proximity to employment centers and trans-
portation corridors and include mixed use development where
appropriate. (See Section 2 - Land Use)
Transportation Planning: Consider alternatives to the automobile
such as increased car pooling, flexible work schedules, use of bi-
cycles, pedestrian pathways and telecommuting. Support multi-
modal public transit to reduce congestion, air and water quality
pollution and the significant costs of road construction. Encour-
age reduced street width. Strengthen street tree protection. (See
Section 4 - Circulation)
GOAL B
REDUCED USE OF NON-RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCESjSUST AINABIUTY
5-5
Policy 5-2: Conservation and Efficient Use of Energy Resources
Encourage the maximum feasible conservation and efficient use of
electrical power and natural gas resources for new and existing
residences, businesses, industrial and public uses.
Strategies
1.
Alternate Energy Sources. Encourage the use of solar energy and
other alternate, renewable energy resources for all new and signifi-
cantly renovated (Note: Staff and Task Force/Commission to define
metric of "significantly renovated") private and public buildings.
Ensure that all homes have an acceptable balance of access to the
sun and protection from it. Promote new technologies, such as wa-
terless water heaters to effect this change.
2.
Comprehensive Energy Management Plan. Prepare and imple-
ment a comprehensive energy management plan for all applicable
public facilities, equipment and procurement and construction prac-
tices.
3.
Consistency with State and Federal Regulations: Review and
evaluate applicable City codes, ordinances, and procedures for in-
clusion of local, state and federal policies and standards that pro-
mote the conservation and efficient use of energy and for
consistency with the goal of sustainability. Change those, which
will promote energy efficiency without a punitive effect.
4
Using life cycle cost analysis, identify City assets for replacement
with more energy efficient replacements.
5.
Incentive Program. Implement an incentive program to include
such items as reduced permit fees for building projects that exceed
Title 24 requirements. Promote other incentives from the State,
County and Federal Governments for improving energy efficiency
by posting information regarding incentive. rebate and tax credit
programs on the City's web site. Let's make learning about this
easy and help those interested get started!
6.
Solar Access Standards. Ensure compliance with the State of Cali-
fomia Subdivision Map Act solar access standards in order to
maximize natural heating and cooling opportunities for future resi-
dences. Encourage the inclusion of additional shade trees and land-
scaping for energy efficiency.
7.
Educational Programs.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
.~
-://1.'-
ll'l. ",,'.'
...'ÍIdIf .
5-6
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCESjSUSTAINABILITY
Develop conservationj efficiency educational programs serving
all utility users.
Provide informational materials and participate in energy con-
servation workshops.
Provide educational materials, seminar and staff training on en-
ergy conservationj efficiency for those who design, build and
manage building facilities, and for those who regulate building
design and construction.
. In partnership with De Anza College develop a "Sustainable Building
Practices" guide for Cupertino residents and businesses. The Guide
should include Information regarding current rebates and subsidies to
make implementing a sustainable building more financially ath'active
with references back to the City, State, Federal and other web sites for
up-to-date information.
. Provide education materials, seminars and a certification program for
contractors and architects who have participated in "Sustainable
Building" courses. Many of the curriculums are currently available at
De Anza College. As an incentive for participating the "Sustainable
Building" program the City wi!! maintain a "Sustainable
Builder/Developer" page on their current City website. This page
wi!! not be an endorsement of the individual or company listed. but a
resource center for the community.
Establish and maintain an Energy Information Center or Kiosk at City
Hall where information concerning energy issues, building standards,
recycling and assistance is available.
Require residents and business that are remodeling to review and sign as
acknowledgment that they have reviewed the "Sustainable Building
Practices" guide prior to permits being issued.
7.
E rgy Cogeneration Systems. Encourage the use of energy cogeneration
sy tems through the provision of an awareness program targeting the larger
co ercial and industrial users and public facilities.
8.
Re lation of Building Design: Ensure designer, developers, applicants and
bu ders meet California Title 24 Energy Efficient Building Standards and
en ourage architects, building designers and contractors to exceed "Title 24"
re uirements for new projects through the provision of incentives. Encourage
eit er passive solar heating and or dark plaster interior with a cover for
s' . g pools, cabanas and other related accessory uses where solar access
is available. Encourage the use of alternative renewable sources where
'Tie. "'" develop ~'gy """ oc ,"bv="= pro,,-
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE5/SU5TAINABILITY
5-7
9.
Use of Discretionary Development Permits (Use Permits): RequiIe, as
conditions of approval for new and renovated projects, the provision of
energy conservation/ efficiency applications.
10. Energy Efficient Transportation Modes. Encourage alternative, energy
efficient transportation modes such as "clean" multi-modal public transit, car
and vanpooling, flexible work hours, and pedestrian and bicycle paths.
Green Buildings
The planning, construction and maintenance of buildings has an extraordi-
nary effect on environmental resources. Buildings consume significant quantities of
water, wood and energy. Nationally, buildings consume one-third of all the energy
and two-thirds of the electricity. 50% of home energv consumed is used for heating
and cooling. In addition, buildings are a significant source of interior and exterior
urban air quality problems and generate large quantities of waste and affect climate
change.
A "green" building is one that is designed, constructed, renovated and
maintained in an ecological and resource efficient manner. Green buildings
provide opportunities not only for conservation and efficient resource use,
but also to create healthier structures and long term, cost savings.
The essential components of a green building design and planning process
include:
. Location - in proximity to public transit, shopping and recreational
facilities
. Site Planning - solar orientation, protection of existing vegetation and
use of ecologically appropriate landscaping
. Energy Efficiency - Exceeding State, Title 24 energy requirements, see
Energy section below; architectural design to mitigate heating, cooling
and lighting loads
. Material Efficiency - selection, substitution and reuse of sustainable
construction materials
. Water Efficiency - employ water saving design techniques and de-
vices
GOAL C
ENERGY CONSERViNG AND EFFICIENT BUn..DINGS
Policy 5-3; Green Building Design
Encourage the design and construction of energy and resource con-
serving/ efficient building (Green Building Design).
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFf GENERAL PLAN
~'..'
-{,í\ ..'\-,
t~....
5-8
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
Strategies
1.
"Green Building" Evaluation Program. Prepare and implement a
"Green Building" evaluation for all private and public projects. In-
clude an "Energy Efficient Design and Landscaping Manual" for
use by designers, contractors and owners. (See Green Building sec-
tion above). Evaluation software is available on the State Energy
Commissions web site.
2.
Building energy audits. Participate in and encourage building en-
ergy audits, where feasible, for commercial, industrial and city fa-
cilities and convey to the business and industrial communities that
energy conservation/ efficiency is, in the long term, economically
beneficial. PG&E also offers energy evaluation tools and services
free of charge.
3.
"Green Buildings" Evaluation Guide. Prepare a "Green Buildings"
evaluation guide based upon the above listed "essential compo-
nents" for use by the city staff when reviewing projects.
Staff Training. Train appropriate staff in the design principles,
costs and benefits of energy conservation/ efficient buildings and
landscape design.
4.
L"Green Buildings" Informational Seminars. Conduct and/or par-
ticipate in "Green Buildings" informational seminars and workshops
to include people involved in the design and construction industry,
land development, real estate sales, lending institutions, landscaping
and design, the building maintenance industry and prospective pro-
ject applicants. We recommend modeling this program after the
CERT program.
4. Public Communication: Become a regular feature article in the Cu-
pertino Scene, do media outreach to the Courier and the Guide (ST
Mercmy) tape the Sustainable Building and other conservation
courses, or seminars and broadcast them on the City Channel as
well, as make them available at the Library.
Air Quality
Air quality remains a serious health hazard for residents in the Bay
Area Air Basin. Even after three decades of efforts to cleanse the air, air
pollution still causes a significant amount of discoTIÚort, illness and some-
times death in the region. Particularly vulnerable are children, the elderly
and people with heart or lung problems. Sometimes healthy adults may
experience breathing problems during periods of intense outdoor exercise.
Air pollutants may also have an adverse effect on vegetation, animals and
property. In addition, national or world-wide pollution issues, the deple-
tion of the ozone layer and world-wide climatic changes pose serious chal-
lenges for communities seeking a sustainable future.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCESjSU5TAINABILITY
5-9
Air pollution potential is based upon the tendency for high pollutant
concentrations to develop at any given location. This potential is depend-
ent upon the amount of pollutants emitted into the air and the local atmos-
phere's ability to transport and dilute that pollutant. The County's
topography, prevailing wind pattem and frequent air inversions combine
to catch and hold the pollutants that the urban area releases daily into the
air. Air pollution is composed of a vast assortment of gases and particles
that can be grouped in three categories: particulate matter, carbon monox-
ide and ozone. A large proportion of air pollution in Santa Clara County is
automobile related.
The existing development patterns, countywide, contribute to the fur-
ther deterioration of air quality. For example, the majority of affordable
housing for low to moderate employees is outside of the County or in ad-
joining cities. This requires employees to commute long distances daily to
and from work which in turn increases air pollution countywide. Also,
much of the Citywide residential areas are separated from commercial
uses, which in turn requires residents to drive vehicles to complete errands.
This tends to increase air pollution within the commUlúty. Land use plan-
ning is beginning to change with these considerations in mind.
Much progress has been made in monitoring and reducing fixed or
"point sources" of pollution, such as factories and power plants. Pollution
from "non-point" or mobile sources, such as motor vehicles, private prop-
erty, etc., continues to prove an illusive challenge. As Santa Oara County
continues to be the population and employment growth center of the re-
gion, residents, employers and municipalities must take responsibility for
the impacts of air pollution on the quality of life. The policies and strategies
identified in the "Green Building" and "Energy" portions of this General
Plan and those listed below are designed to improve air quality to a
healthy and sustainable level.
REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL PLANNING
Air quality standards are established by both the State Air Resources
Board and the Federal Environmental Protection Agency air quality man-
agement agencies. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District has the
responsibility to create compliance strategies, and monitor and enforce
State and Federal standards in the nine county Bay Area District. Bay Area
air quality has improved significantly over the past 20 years of air quality
planning and control efforts, in spite of substantial increases in population,
traffic and industrialization. The last full Air Quality Plan was adopted in
1991 and there have been three updates since, including the last in Decem-
ber 2000, to assess compliance and adopt needed measures to meet those
standards that are still not met in the Bay Area. In 2002, the District was
designated as non-compliant oruy for State and Federal ozone standards
and for State particulate standards. Local government agencies are ex-
pected to participate in adopting policies to support District, State and Fed-
eral air quality management planning.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFf GENERAL PLAN
.~
-(~/
5-10
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY
While air quality is often regarded as a regional or state problem, it is
important for local land use and growth decisions to support improve-
ments in air quality. The land use, circulation, energy and environmental
policies that comprise this General Plan will contribute to meeting
BAAQMD and ARB Air Quality improvement plans.
GOAL D
HEALTHY AIR QUALITY LEVELS FOR THE CITIZENS OF
CUPERTINO UTILIZING LOCAL PLANNING EFFORTS
Policy 5-4: Air Pollution Effects of New Development
Minimize the air quality impacts of new development projects.
Strategies
1.
Toxic Air Contaminants. Review projects for potential generation
of toxic air contaminants at the time of approval and confer with
BAAQMD on controls needed if impacts are uncertain.
Dust Control. Require water application to non-polluting dust con-
trol measures during demolition and the duration of the construc-
tion period.
2.
3.
Planning Decisions. Assess the potential for air pollution effects of
future land use and transportation planning, and ensure that plan-
ning decisions support regional goals of improving air quality.
Policy 5-5: Air Pollution Effects of Existing Development
Minimize the air quality impacts of existing development.
Strategies
1.
Public Education Program. Establish a Citywide public education
program regarding the implications of the Clean Air Act and pro-
vide information on ways to reduce and control enù5sions; provide
information about carpooling and restricting physical activities on
"Spare the Air" high-pollution days.
2.
Home Occupations. Expand the allowable home occupations in
residentially zoned properties to reduce the need to commute to
work.
3.
Tree Planting. Increase planting of trees on City property and en-
courage the practice on private property.
Fuel-efficient Vehicles. Maintain City use of fuel-efficient and low
polluting vehicles.
4.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
5-11
5. Work with County to monitor and influence improvement of emis-
sions and dust from the Hanson and Stevens Creek Quarryies on the
West end of the City.
Policy 5-6: Walking, Jogging and Bicycling
Encourage walking, jogging and bicycling instead of driving in the
City.
SEE Poucy 4-3 IN mE
ORCU1.ATlON ELEMENT
Policy 5-7: Use of Open Fires and Fireplaces
Discourage high pollution fireplace use.
Strategies
1.
BAAQMD Literature. Make available BAAQMD literature on re-
ducing pollution from fireplace use.
2.
Installation of New Fireplaces. Prohibit the use of wood-burning
fireplaces in new construction.
Wildlife and Vegetation
Biodiversity, which includes a diversity of plants and animals found
in nature, provides the foundation for the ecosystems that are required to
sustain life. The City's current and continued health and prosperity de-
pends, in part, on the ability of its natural resources to renew themselves.
Cupertino's wildlife and natural vegetation resources are concentrated
in the relatively undeveloped western foothills and mountains and along
Stevens Creek, not on the valley floor. Urbanization of the valley floor has
rendered this environment ill-suited to the needs of wildlife and native
plants. Most of the native vegetation was removed by historic agricultural
activities and the introduction of non-native grasses and crops. Native
vegetation was further reduced by the more recent construction of homes,
businesses, industries and infrastructure that supports the community. Fire
also threatens vegetation and the animals that depend on it for food and
shelter. The loss of vegetation also meant a concomitant loss of wildlife
habitat that provided food, cover and shelter for numerous wildlife species.
STREAMSIDES
Riparian vegetation grows along stream courses where there is fertile
soil and ample water. It often appears as a distinct band of vegetation
when contrasted against other uses. Such vegetation can be found along
Stevens Creek, Permanente Creek, Regnart Creek, Heney Creek and a por-
tion of Calabazas Creek. Common plants include: willow, Califomia buck-
eye, Coast live oak, coyote brush, poison oak and California blackberry.
Riparian habitats are considered among the most valuable habitats of wild-
life because of the presence of water, lush vegetation and high insect popu-
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
~
-(LL~
~
5-12
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
lations. Less disturbed riparian areas support a wide variety of wildlife,
including amphibian, reptile, bird and mammal species.
GRASSLANDS
Grassland habitats occur on the lower slopes of the western foothills
and at scattered locations at higher elevations in the Montebello Ridge sys-
tem. Much of these areas were formerly used for pasture and are largely
composed of non-native grasses. Plant species occurring in this habitat in-
clude wild oat, clover, rye grass and vetch. During the spring season, dis-
plays of wildflowers are expected which may include California poppy,
plantago and owl clover.
Reptile and mammal species adapted to dry conditions are common in
this habitat. They include the western fence lizard, western rattlesnake and
the common king snake. Mammals include a variety of burrowing rodents,
such as meadow mice and California ground squirrel.
BRUSH LANDS
Brushlands are a scrubby, dense vegetation type that often integrates
with woodland habitat. This vegetation is often found on dry, rocky, steep
slopes. Dominant plant species include coyote brush, poison oak, Califor-
nia sage and ceanothus. Mule deer, brush rabbit, bobcat and coyote utilize
brushlands as part of a larger home range.
FOOTHILL WOODLANDS AND FORESTS
Characteristic of the woodland vegetation are scattered oak trees with
an undergrowth in some areas of plants and low shrubs. Higher elevations
in the Montebello Foothills include mixed hardwood trees and evergreen,
including redwoods. Woodlands benefit wildlife as a food source, and as
shelter, nesting or cover; they help control erosion from foothill drainage
basins; they reduce wind speeds, increasing the oxygen in the atmosphere
and neutralizing certain pollutants.
Woodlands provide visual relief from the urbanized vaIIeyfloor. The
Montebello Ridge system's extensive tree cover gives seasonal color varia-
tion, variety of shape and definition of hiIIside contours. Insect or seed eat-
ing birds and mammals are common in the woodlands and are preyed
upon by raptors and owls that also inhabit these areas. The larger mam-
mals, deer coyote, etc., utilize these areas as well.
GOAL E
PROTECTION OF SPECIAL AREAS OF NATURAL VEGETATION
AND WILDLIFE HABITATION AS INTEGRAL PARTS OF THE
SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT.
Policy 5-8: Public Project Landscaping
Encourage public and quasi-public agencies to landscape their city
area projects near native vegetation with appropriate native plants
and draought tolerant non-invasive non-native plants.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
5-13
Strategy
Development Plans. Review development plans for opportunities
for use of native plants and drought tolerant non-invasive non-
native plants.
Policy 5-9: Development Near Sensitive Areas
Encourage the clustering of new development away from sensitive
areas such as riparian corridors, wildlife habitat and corridors, pub-
lic open space preserves and ridgelines. New developments in
these areas must have a hnrmoJ1Ìolls landscaping plans approved
prior to development.
Strategy
Riparian Corridor Protection. Require riparian corridor protection
through a riparian corridor ordinance and through the develop-
ment approval process.
Policy 5-10: Landscaping Near Natural Vegetation
Emphasize drought tolerant and pesticide-resistant native and non-
invasive non-native drought tolerant plants and ground covers
when landscaping properties near natural vegetation, particularly
for control of erosion from disturbance to the natural terrain.
Policy 5-11: Natural Area Protection
Preserve and enhance the existing natural vegetation, landscape
features and open space when new development is proposed.
Strategy
Native Plants. Re.¡ffiæ- Encourage drought tolerant native and
drought tolerant non-invasive non-native plants and trees, and
minimize lawn area in the hillsides.
Policy 5-12: Hillside Property Fencing
Confine fencing on hillside property to the area around a building,
rather than around an entire site, to allow for nñgration of wild
animals.
Policy 5-13: Recreation in Natural Areas
Limit recreation in natural areas to activities compatible with pre-
serving natural vegetation, such as hiking, horseback riding moun-
tain biking and camping.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
_~./i\t..
j,;,.\,-
l~;/'
5-14
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
Policy 5-14: Recreation and Wildlife Trails
Provide open space linkages within and between properties for
both recreational and wildlife activities, most specifically for the
benefit of wildlife that is threatened, endangered or designated as
species of special concern.
Strategy
Require identification of creeks and water courses on site plans and
require that they be protected from adjacent development. State
that trail easements for trail linkages may be required if analysis de-
termines that they are needed.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
5-15
(insert Figure 5-A Vegetation here)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
~l!
'Ú. ¿!
~
5-16
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
(back of Figure 5-A)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL RFSOURCES(SUSTAINABILITY
5-17
Mineral Resources
Longstanding extraction of mineral resources in the Cupertino area
has provided valuable construction materials to the region. At the same
time, the air quality, noise and traffic impacts on the community created by
extraction activities quarries need to be addressed.
The State of Califomia, recognizing the value of preserving the State's
mineral deposits, in order to achieve a sustainable future, enacted the Sur-
face Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA). The objective of
SMARA is to assist local governments in conserving mineral deposits for
future use. These mineral resource areas are shown in Figure 5-B. This map
identifies natural resource areas and requires that jurisdictions recognize
them and emphasize conservation and development of these areas.
There are mineral resource areas in the City's boundary agreement ar-
eas and in the City limits. Within Cupertino's boundary agreement areas
there are two quarries, Hanson Permanente and Stevens Creek, which have
been designated by the State as having mineral deposits of regional or state
significance. Since the quarries are in the unincorporated area, Santa Clara
County has regulatory jurisdiction. The County's mineral resource policies
are directed toward preserving existing resource areas and, where feasible,
designating new areas and expanding existing sites.
Within Cupertino's City limits there are classified mineral resource ar-
eas for which the State requires policies supporting preservation and ex-
traction. Most of the areas are already developed into residential and other
uses. One area, the "Gravel Pit" is considered depleted. These areas, there-
fore, would not benefit from conservation. The areas that would benefit
from conservation are outside the City limits.
Cupertino's proposed policies recognize the existence and potential of
the identified mineral resource areas. However, proposed policies reflect
an underlying assumption the quarries should be limited to their existing
operations in terms of noise and traffic. For many years, Cupertino resi-
dents have expressed concern about quarry pollution, noise and traffic.
Cupertino officials have stated at public hearings that the operation con-
trols and limits should be set. New areas could be accessed as long as cur-
rent noise and traffic levels are not exceeded and environmental concerns
are met.
GOAL F
MINERAL RESOURCE AREAS THAT MINIIII12E COUUUftITY
IMPACTS AND IDENTIFY FUTURE USES
Policy 5-15: Mineral Resource Areas
Consider new mineral resource areas within Cupertino's sphere of
influence, but the cumulative impact of existing and proposed ac-
tivity should not exceed present operations in terms of noise and
traffic. Work with Santa Clara County to assure that mining opera-
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFf GENERAL PLAN
~
-{T\....¿
-~"
5-18
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCESjSUSTAINABILITY
tions outside the City limits are consistent with the City's General
Plan, that restoration plans are adequate, and that mining activity is
not extended into undisturbed lands without adequate documenta-
tion of economic purpose and environmental impacts and mitiga-
tions.
Strategies
1.
Traffic and Noise Studies. Perform traffic and noise studies if ap-
plications for increased mineral extraction activities are proposed.
2.
Joint Study Process. Establish a joint study process in the sphere of
influence and boundary agreement areas with Santa Clara County
to reach agreement on future land uses and mineral extraction ac-
tivities.
Policy 5-16: Mineral Extraction Controls
Control scenic restoration and noise pollution as well as air and wa-
ter pollution in mineral extraction quarrying, processing and trans-
portation
Policy 5-17: Incompatible Land Uses
Conserve mineral resource areas outside the City.
Strategy
New Development. When new development is proposed, do not
allow incompatible land uses in and around identified mineral re-
source areas. Uses considered incompatible are high density resi-
dential, low density residential with high unit value, public
facilities and industrial and commercial uses with intensive im-
pacts.
Policy 5-18: Recreation at Old Quarries
Consider the desirability of designating abandoned quarries for
passive recreation to rehabilitate the land.
Water Resources
The City's sustainable future is, in part, dependent upon an adequate
supply of clean water as well as the effective management of natural wa-
tershed resources. In addition to fundamental health and sanitation, an
adequate potable water supply provides significant public and private
benefits such as irrigation, ecological habitat, recreation opportunities and
aesthetics.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
5-19
In recent years water management emphasis has shifted away from
supply side efforts such as the creation of dams and reservoirs to water
conserving and efficiency technologies used in planning, design and con-
struction of sites, buildings and land uses.
(insert Figure 5-B Mineral Resources here)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
-~.
Úl4,
~
5-20
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
PRESERVATION OF WATERSHEDS
The Cupertino planIÙng area has a very productive watershed lands,
with abundant vegetation and heavy rainfall. This watershed is important
to the City, the county and the region as surface runoff flows into the
stream corridors and storm drain systems and eventually terminates at the
wildlife refuges and environmentally sensitive areas of the southem por-
tion of San Francisco Bay. It is, therefore, crucial that the City's watershed,
including stream corridors, be protected from pollutants, siltation, sedi-
mentation erosion and loss of vegetation.
GOAL G
PROTECTION AND EFFICIENT USE OF WATER RESOURCES
Policy 5-19: Natural Water Bodies and Drainage Systems
Require that site design respect the natural topography and drain-
ages to the extent practicable to reduce the amount of grading nec-
essary and limit disturbance to natural water bodies and natural
drainage systems caused by development including roads, high-
ways, and bridges.
Policy 5-20: Reduction of Impervious Surfaces
~Minimize storm water flow and erosion impacts resulting from de-
velopment.
Chan~e City codes,-€t€-.to include a formula regulatin~ how much
paved surface is allowable on each lot. This would include driveways
and patios installed at the time of building or remodeling.
Encourage the use of non-impervious materials for walkways drive-
ways ,.-etE... If used in a City or quasi-public area, mobility and access
for handicapped should always take precedent.
Strategy
Minimize impervious surface areas, minimizing directly-connected
impervious surfaces, maximizing onsite infiltration and using on-
site retaining facilities.
Encourage volunteer organizations to help restore and clean the
creek beds. (Note: We'd need an organization like Parks and Rec or
the Citv Arborist or other City Staff member to provide facilitation,
setpriorities,etc...)
Policy 5-21: Pollution and Flow Impacts
Prior to making land use decisions, estimate increases in pollutant
loads and flows resulting from projected future development.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUST AINABILITY
Strategy
Best Management Practices. Require incorporation of structural
and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) to mitigate
the projected increases in pollutant loads and flows.
Policy 5-22: Compact Development Away from Sensitive Areas
Where such measures do not conflict with other municipal pur-
poses or goals, encourage, via zoning ordinances, compact devel-
opment located away from creeks, wetlands, and other sensitive
areas.
Policy 5-23: ConfoT11Ulnce with Watershed-Based Planning and Zoning
Encourage development projects to follow watershed-based plan-
ning and zoning by examining the project in the context of the en-
tire watershed area.
GROUND WATER RECHARGE FACIUTIES
The Santa Clara County groundwater basin is the largest water supply
in Santa Clara County. It has an estimated capacity of 1,770,000 acre feet,
compared to reservoir capacity of only 160,000 acre feet. The Santa Clara
Valley Water District prevents an excessive amount of water from being
drawn from wells by placing recharge sites (percolation ponds) throughout
the valley where the geological composition of the soil is suitable. Two of
these sites are located in Cupertino. j
Policy 5-24: Ground Water Recharge Sites
Support the Santa Clara Valley Water
District to find and develop
groundwater recharge sites within
Cupertino's planning area and
provide for public recreation at the
sites where possible.
Policy 5-25: Other Water Sources
Encourage the research of other water
sources, including water reclamation.
Policy 5-26: Industrial Water Recycling
Encourage industrial projects,
especially at the building permit approval stage, to have long-term
conservation measures including recycling equipment for manufac-
turing and pooling water supplies in the plant. Work with the Cu-
pertino Sanitary District to carry out this policy.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFf GENERAL PLAN
5-21
~
,lilt ../...
~.
5-22
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
Policy 5-27: Natural Water Courses
Retain and restore creek beds, riparian corridors, watercourses and
associated vegetation in their natural state to protect wildlife habitat
and recreation potential and assist groundwater percolation. En-
courage land acquisition or dedication of such areas.
Strategy
Santa Clara Valley Water District. Work with the Santa Clara Val-
ley Water District and other relevant regional agencies to enhance
riparian corridors and provide adequate flood control by use of
flow increase ITÚtigation measures.
OTHER WATER RESOURCES
Cupertino has two major water suppliers: the California Water Com-
pany and the San Jose Water Company.
Water comes from two main sources: wells fed by groundwater, and
imported water from the Rinconada Treatment Plant. Cupertino receives
approximately 1.7 ITÚllion gallon a day from the underground sources and
about 4.5 million gallons a day from the Rinconada plant. Stevens Creek
Reservoir yields about 2,500 acre feet per year to the seasonal run-off from
groundwater recharge. The Santa Clara Valley Water District projected the
total demand for Cupertino at about 6.85 million gallons a day, which can
be reduced through conservation. Cupertino residents consume ap1?roxi-
mately 131.7 gallons on water per day (6.85 MM g;allons per day /52,000
residents) which compares favorable to the Bay Area average of 161.2 g;al-
Ions per day (Bay Area Water User Associations). However this does not
mean further conservation is not necessary.
URBAN CONSERVATION
Climatic conditions of the region vary from periods of relatively dry
seasons to seasons of heavy rainfall. In recent times, the region has experi-
enced periods of drought in the ITÚd-1970s and the late 1980s. Given the
cyclical nature of the climatic conditions, it may be assumed that the region
will experience additional periods of drought in the future.
During these past periods of drought, the two water companies within
the boundaries of the City imposed water restrictions on their customers in
response to the Santa Clara Valley Water District's policy to reduce overall
water usage by 25% during the months of high water usage. The policy is
periodically reviewed based upon water reserves, water usage and rainfall
amounts. Ground water pumping was also restricted during drought peri-
ods because over-pumping lowered the water table and ground subsidence
occurred throughout the Valley. The Santa Clara Valley Water District does
not have sufficient allocation from the California Water Project nor the
Federal Water Project, so water conservation is of great econoITÚc, social
and environmental importance.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
5-23
Citywide, the majority of the water connections and usage is residen-
tial. Therefore, the burden of water conservation falls largely on residential
users. Even though the number of industrial connections may be less than
residential, consumption is high per connection and conservation measures
are still warranted.
The Santa Clara Valley Water District indicates it has the ability to
meet the long-term water needs of Cupertino water retailers. The District
Water Supply Master Plan has planned for growth, based upon the maxi-
mum growth potential of all municipalities in the District, which does not
exceed ABAG's projections.
In the 2001 session, the State Legislature and Governor enacted Senate
Bills 221 and 610, which require that projects should not be planned or ap-
proved without access to a reliable and sustainable water source. SB 610
requires that Urban Water management Plans must be prepared and/or
expanded to include supply and demand, conservation, drought contin-
gencies and sustainable sources; also, water supply information must be
incorporated into any environmental evaluation required pursuant to The
California Environmental Quality Act for certain projects.
Policy 5-28: Interagency Coordination
Actively pursue interagency coordination for regional water supply
problem solving.
Policy 5-29: Local Conservation Policies Similar to Region-wide Policies
Maintain citywide efforts of water conservation similar to those be-
ing conducted on a regional scale. Many of these conservation ef-
forts are outlined in the Santa Oara Valley Water District Drought
Plan and Countywide Water Use Reduction program.
Policy 5-30: Public Information Effort
Provide the public information regarding water conserva-
tion/ efficiency techniques including how paving and other imper-
vious surfaces impact runoff.
Strategy
Consider sending regular notices to households and businesses on
water prohibitions, water allocations and conservation tips. Become
a regularly featured article in the Cupertino Scene, Courier and
Guide. Provide conservation videotapes on the City's government
channel.
Include Water-wise demonstration gardens in ea€fl-some parks
where feasible as they are relandscaped or improved using draught
tolerant native and non-invasive non-native plants.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
~!
-a~
5-24
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCESjSUSTAINABILITY
Work with the County Master Gardeners to identify water-wise
plant materials and irrigation methods for use in public and private
areas. This information should be posted on the Sustainable por-
tion of the City's web site in included in Cupertino Scene Sustain-
able column.
Policy 5-31: Excessive Water Use
Prohibit excessive water uses throughout the City.
Strategies:
2.
Landscaping Plans. Encourage water-efficient landscaping plans as
part of the development review process.
Water Conservation Programs. Undertake programs for long-term
water conservation at City Buildings, including installation of low
flow toilets and showers, installation of automatic shut off valves in
lavatories and sinks and water efficient outdoor irrigation.
SEEMm
CHAPTEI
1.
URBAN RUNOFF POLLUTION
Urban runoff pollution is caused by the accumulated debris and
chemicals on streets and pavements that are carried by water runoff into
the storm drain system and eventually into San Francisco Bay. Unlike pol-
lutants that come from a point source, such as sewer pipe, urban runoff
pollutants are washed from streets, parking lots, neighborhoods, construc-
tion sites and other exposed surfaces throughout the City.
While urban runoff pollutants come from a variety of sources, many
of them are familiar to residents because they originate from the home and
automobile. They include detergents, paint products, pet wastes, garden
pesticides, fertilizers, eroded soils, motor oil and car exhaust. Since the
storm drains are separate from the sanitary sewers, pollutants carried by
water runoff into the storm drain are not treated and flow directly into the
creeks and streams that feed San Francisco Bay.
Previously, it was widely believed that wastewater treatment plants
industries and other sources were the main contributors of contaminants to
the Bay. Today, urban runoff is recognized as a significant contributor to
Bay pollution. The concentrations of pollutants can have deleterious effects
on aquatic wildlife, which include the impairment of growth, reproduction
and overall health of sediment-dwelling organisms, fish and other wildlife.
Some toxic substances accumulated by aquatic organisms enter the food
chain when consumed by larger fish, birds or humans.
GOVERNMENT ACTION
To comply with an National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Municipal Storm Water permit, enforced by the San Francisco
Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, the 15 local municipalities
formed the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program
(SCVURPPP). The SCVURPPP works with the participating agencies and
the Regional Board to Develop feasible solutions to controlling urban run-
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
5-25
off quality. In addition, Cupertino is required to prepare a city-specific Ur-
ban Runoff Management Plan. This plan identifies the strategies, tasks and
schedules needed to implement a wide array of pollution control measures.
Initially, many of the urban runoff pollution control measures cen-
tered on education and eliminating illegal discharges. As the public has
become more aware of the urban runoff problem and illegal discharges
elimination, the focus has shifted to controlling the impacts of new and re-
development.
GOAL H
IMPROVED QUALITY OF STORM WATER RUNOFF
Policy 5-32: Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program
Support and participate in the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pol-
lution Prevention Program (SCVURPPP) in order to work coopera-
tively with other cities to improve the quality of storm water runoff
discharge into San Francisco Bay.
Policy 5-33: Illicit Discharge into Storm Drains and Waterways
Prohibit the discharge of pollutants and the illicit dumping of
wastes into the storm drains, creeks and waterways.
Policy 5-34: Storm Water Runoff
Encourage the reduction of impervious surface areas and investi-
gate opportunities to retain or detain storm runoff on new devel-
opment.
Policy 5-35: Development on Septic Systems
Do not permit urban development to occur in areas not served by a
sanitary sewer system, except in the previously approved Regnart
Canyon development.
Policy 5-36: Mitigation for Potential Storm Water Impacts
Require mitigation measures for potential storm water pollutant
impacts for projects subject to environmental review.
Policy 5-37: Pest-Resistant Landscaping and Design Features
The City will encourage the consideration of pest-resistant land-
scaping and design features, and the incorporation of storm water
detention and retention techniques in the design and landscaping of
proposed development projects
The City will reduce runoff from the use of pesticides and chemical
fertilizers from public and quasi-public land. by employing com-
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFf GENERAL PLAN
~.......,
..>n...'" .
-, f 1 /
~
5-26
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
panion planting techniques, using pesticides such as insecticidal
soaps and oils, mulching, release of beneficial insects, etc. ..as ap-
propriate.
SOLID WASTE
In recognition of the concerns expressed regarding the diminishing
landfill capacity and the scarcity of potential landfill sites to meet the fu-
ture solid waste disposal needs, the State Legislature passed AB 939, which
required that cities reduce the amount of waste going to landfill sites. The
State mandated requirement was a two step process: a twenty-five (25) per-
cent reduction by 1995 and a second twenty-five (25) percent reduction by
2000 for a total reduction of fifty (50) percent. The City has now reduced
the solid waste tonnage disposal to comply with the State mandated re-
quirements.
The Los Altos Garbage Company provides garbage pickup and recy-
cling services to the City of Cupertino. The Cupertino residents and indus-
tries dispose of approximately 38,000 tons of garbage annually. Residential
land uses account for 22% of the total tonnage; commercial and industrial
land uses account for 40%; debris boxes (construction materials) account
for 22%; while self- haul accounts for 16% of the total annual tonnage.
Concerns regarding the lack of potential landfill sites to meet future
needs for solid waste disposal and growing recognition of the environ-
mental impacts associated with landfill usage prompted Cupertino to ex-
plore potential solutions to the solid waste disposal problem. To meet its
future solid waste disposal needs, the City has executed a contract with
Browning and Ferris that provides landfill capacity at Newby Island in
Milpitas. The term of the agreement is 35 years and ends in 2023, or at the
time the specified tonnage allocated (2,050,000 tons) is reached.
GOAL I
A SOLID WASTE STREAM REDUCTION PROGRAM THAT
MEETS OR EXCEEDS STATE REQUIREMENTS
The City is beginning to explore the possibility of expanding its recy-
cling programs to include food waste (to be composted) and construction
and demolition waste (to be recycled or reused). In addition, the City is in-
vestigating the available options for recycling or disposal of electronic
waste. Some of the current options have been shown to be unacceptable for
environmental reasons. The City will continue to work to determine the
best options for its residents and businesses.
Policy 5-38: Commercial/Industrial Recycling
Expand existing commercial and industrial recycling programs to
meet and surpass AB939 waste stream reduction goals.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSfAINABILITY
5-27
Strategy
Increase Recycling. Request that all commercial and industrial uses
increase their recycling efforts to help the city achieve its recycling
goals.
Policy 5-39: Residential Recycling
Streamline the residential curbside recycling
program in the next decade. All city-wide
residential zoning districts should be in-
cluded in the curbside recycling program.
Strategy
Coordination with Los Altos Garbage
Company. Work closely with the Los Altos
Garbage Company to develop and implement
efficient and effective recycling methods.
Continue/make permanent the e-waste recycling program.
Expand Curbside Recycling of vard waste. Include vegetable; fruit
and other appropriate food items, as well as. recycling of non-
reusable batteries as the City of Palo Alto does.
Policy 5-40: On-site Garbage Area Dedication
Modify existing, and require for new developments, on-site waste
facility requirements for all multi-family residential, commercial
and industrial land uses to have 50% of their garbage area dedi-
cated to recycling and no more than 50% garbage.
Strategy
Ordinance Revisions. Revise existing ordinances relative to on-site
waste facility requirements for all multi-family residential, com-
mercial and industrial zoning districts to require that a minimum of
50% of garbage area be dedicated to recycling.
Policy 5-41: Public Education
Promote the existing public education program regarding the re-
duction of solid waste disposal and recycling.
Strategy
Recycling Program Information. Use the local television channel,
the Cupertino Scene, the Internet and other available media to pro-
vide information to the residents about the objectives of the City's
recycling program.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFf GENERAL PLAN
~
{~
5-28
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
Policy 5-42: City Recycling
Encourage City staff to recycle at all City facilities.
Strategy
Recycling Opportunities. Provide collection bins and increase the
number of existing recycling bins at strategically located areas to fa-
cilitate disposal of recyclable materials including all City parks.
Work with CUSD, FUSD and De Anza College. Partner with
Schools! institutions in Cupertino to insure that they understand
and are adhering to the City's recycling goals and providing ade-
quate recycling opportunities to staff and students.
Policy 5-43: Re-distribution or Reusable Materials
Through public education, encourage residents and businesses to
re-distribute reusable materials, e.g., garage sales, materials ex-
change.
Strategies
1.
Dissemination of Recycling Information. Disseminate information
to both businesses and residents regarding the benefits of recycling
and further reducing the solid waste stream.
2.
Use of the Internet. Set up a web site for the benefit of the public
where the availability of recyclable materials can be posted and ex-
changes can be conducted.
Policy 5-44: Reuse of Building Materials
Encourage the recycling and reuse of building materials, including
recycling materials generated by the demolition and remodeling of
buildings.
Strategies:
1.
Post Demolition and Remodeling Projects. Encourage contractors
to post demolition and remodeling projects on the Internet an-
nouncing the availability of potential reusable materials.
Public and Private Projects. Require contractors working on City
projects to use recycled building materials and sustainably har-
vested wood products to the maximum extent possible and encour-
age them to do the same on private projects.
2.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES/SUSTAINABILITY
5-29
Wastewater
Wastewater collection and treatment are provided to the City of Cu-
pertino by the Cupertino Sanitary District and the City of Sunnyvale. The
majority of the City is served by the Cupertino Sewer District, while the
City of Sunnyvale serves only a small portion of the Cupertino Urban Ser-
vice area within the San Jose Rancho Rinconada area, which is located ad-
joining Lawrence Expressway on the east side of the City.
GOAL J
ADEQUATE SEWER CAPACITY
Policy 5-45: Coordination with the Cupertino Sanitary District
Provide input into District's Master Plan preparation process to en-
sure that issues relevant to Cupertino's land use policies are ad-
dressed, and work closely with the District on the implementation
of the General Plan.
The Cupertino Sanitary District came into being in 1957. In 1964 it
prepared its first Master Plan. Presently the District is in the process of
preparing its second Master Plan, a process that will take approximately
two years. The Cupertino Sanitary District collects and transports waste
water collected in Cupertino to the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution
Control Plant located in North San Jose, from which it has purchased 8.6
millions gallons per day (mgp). Presently, the District is only using 5.1
mgp. Therefore, there are 3.5 mgp available to the District to accommodate
future growth.
The District maintains approximately one million feet of sewer lines.
A recent inspection of approximately 100,000 feet of sewer lines revealed
that the system is in good condition. However, although the physical con-
ditions of the infrastructure appear to be good, there are some problems
with the carrying capacity of a number of lines in the system. The lines lo-
cated at the Town Center, south of Wolfe Road and south of I 280 on Wolfe
Road, Stelling Road and Foothill Blvd. are running either at capacity or
over capacity. In order to accommodate the effluent from major develop-
ments, this problem will have to be corrected. The District expects that pri-
vate developers will defray the cost of upgrading the affected sewer lines.
To transport wastewater collected in Cupertino to the Plant, the Sanitary
District must use lines traversing the Cities of Santa Clara and San Jose.
Consequently, Cupertino's effluent generated by future growth may im-
pact these lines. Therefore, the potential impacts on these lines must be
considered.
The City of Sunnyvale provides wastewater treatment service for two
blocks of Cupertino's commercial properties along east Stevens Creek
Boulevard. This service area also includes WÙI1corporated singIe--family
residential properties within the Cupertino Urban Service area. The City of
Sunnyvale Wastewater Treatment Plant has a daily treatment capacity of
29 mgd of which approximately 15 mgd are being utilized. The City of
Sunnyvale can continue to provide treatment capacity for future growth in
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFf GENERAL PLAN
.~
-(LL~
níøf
Section 6
Health and Safety
INTRODUCTION
6-1
The City of Cupertino will be a safe, progressive and balanced community,
where residents can live and businesses thrive in a protected and secure envi-
ronment. The purpose of the Health and Safety Element is to identify and evalu-
ate hazards in the community and to protect it from the risks associated with
these hazards. To ensure the protection of the cornmunity, the Health and Safety
Element sets forth goals, policies, and strategies addressing the potential risks
associated with these hazards. Implementation of these goals, policies and
strategies will prevent or minimize injuries to life and damages to property.
Cupertino will maintain a high level of preparedness to protect the commu-
nity from risks to life, property and the environment associated with both natural
and human-caused disasters. Natural hazards are
earthquakes, floods, wildfires and landslides. Human-
caused hazards are usually the result of carelessness, e.g.,
urban fires, failures of inappropriately designed structures
or long term exposure to excessive noise. Cupertino will
provide effective and efficient fire services to protect the
community from both wild and urban fires. It will provide
paramedic services and life-safety aid to victims of
catastrophic events. Cupertino will also provide health
services to promote the well being of the community, police
and crime prevention services to ensure the safety of the
community and Emergency Services disaster planning and
training to enhance our ability to respond to disasters.
GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS
Cupertino is located in the seisnùcally active San Francisco Bay region,
which hosts several active earthquake faults. It is important for the community to
be prepared for all emergencies. A well-prepared community is better equipped
to cope with any eventuality. Cupertino will use all the available channels of
communication to keep the community apprised of the potential risks related to
geologic and/ or seisnùc activity.
One of the longest and most active faults in the world, the San Andreas
fault, crosses the western portion of Cupertino's planning area. In addition, two
other faults that are closely associated with the San Andreas fault, the Sargent-
Berrocal and Monta Vista-Shannon fault systems, cross the west portion of the
City. These faults manifest a variety of displacement styles. Movement on the San
.~
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
6-2
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Andreas fault is predominantly right-lateral strike-slip, where the earth ruptures in
a horizontal fashion, with the opposite sides of the fault moving to the right with
respect to each other. Movement on the Sargent-Berrocal and Monta Vista-
Shannon faults is more variable in style. Both of these faults are characterized by
"tluust" faulting, where a significant amount of vertical "up-down (so called dip-
slip) displacement occurs on an inclined plane, and one side of the fault is ele-
vated (i.e., thrust over) the other side. Figure 6-A below illustrates the above-
mentioned behavior of the various faults.
I. L SMgent -......... f8IIt
1toriIIoI18ioIc-..t
<if the Qgn Sørfoœ
IVl!rtiallrDeor8d1llod<
., I
. !
I
I
I
í
I
I
i-type:
,~
I
Thrust 1Ðip-5Iip) F8UIt
_cat
i A. San And..... huIt
I
i
!
I
i
i
'wltType: Aight~
(Strilœ-SlIp) Fault
Ditplacement: ~
Figure 6-A. Diagrams Exhibiting Faults Within the Cupertino Planning Area
Characterized By Horizontal (A) and Vertical (B) Displacements.
The primary geologic hazards within Cupertino are landslides and seismic
impacts related to local active fault traces. Seismically induced ground shaking,
surface fault rupture and various forms of earthquake-triggered ground failure
are anticipated within the City during large earthquakes. These geologic hazards
present potential impacts to property and public safety. Six identified categories
of Geologic Hazards within the City are presented in Table 6-A and are briefly
explained. For a more detailed explanation see the Technical Appendix.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Table 6-A. Explanations: Geologic and Seismic Hazards Map of the City of Cu-
pertino Planning Area.
ZONE
DESCRIPTION
(F) - Fault Rupture
Area of potential surface fault rupture hazard within
300 feet east and 600 feet west of the Monta Vista and
Berrocal faults, and within 600 feet of the San Andreas
fault.
(D) - Seisnùc Ground
Deformation
Area within 2,000 feet of the Monta Vista and
Berrocal faults with a moderate to high potential for
ground fracturing, lurching or warping under seisnùc
conditions.
(1) - Landsliding
Area includes all recognized landslide deposits and
steep Stevens Creek canyon walls with a moderate to
high landslide potential under static or seisnùc condi-
tions.
(1) - Inundation/
Liquefaction
Area with moderate to high potential for flood
inundation and moderate potential for liquefaction
under seisnùc conditions.
(H)-Hillside
Area contains moderate to steep slope conditions not
included in the above categories, with an undeter-
mined potential for slope instability.
(V) - Valley
Area includes all relatively level valley floor terrain not
included in the above categories with relatively low
levels of geologic hazard risk.
Following the 1983 Coalinga and 1994 Northridge earthquakes, earth sci-
entists became increasingly aware of earthquakes generated by faults not previ-
ously observed at the earth's surface. These types of faults are appropriately
called "blind faults," and they represent a type of thrust fault that does not rup-
ture completely to the surface. Even though the locations of "blind faults" may
not be known with certainty, they are clearly associated with certain types of geo-
logic environments. It is possible that one or more blind faults may be associated
with the Monta Vista-Shannon fault system, but significant seisnùc data collection
and analysis would be needed to determine the extent of risk (if any) that "blind
faults" may represent within the City.
Figure 6-B generally depicts the location of the various known faults and
hazard zones within the Cupertino planning area.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFr GENERAL PLAN
6-3
.~
6-4
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Table 6-B provides estimates of the recurrence intervals of maximum earth-
quakes expected for faults that would likely affect the Cupertino area. The recur-
rence interval on the San Andreas fault, which last ruptured in 1906, is about 220
years. Data pertaining to the recurrence intervals of large earthquakes on the Sar-
gent-Berrocal and the Monta Vista-Shannon fault systems are less constrained.
However, each year that passes without a major earthquake means that an earth-
quake is more likely to occur within any future year.
Table 6-B. Maximum Earthquake Magnitudes and ReculTence Intervals.
Distance Maximum Maximum Est. Recur-
from Historic Probable rence Interval
Causative De AnzajSCB Moment Moment of Max. Prob.
Faults Intersection Magnitude Magnitude Earthquake
San Andreas 5.5 Miles 7.9 7.9 220 Years
San Hayward
Andreas (South) 10 Miles 7.0 7.0 236 Years
System
Calaveras
(Central) 14 Miles 6.2 7.0 374 Years
Sargent- 3.5 Miles 3.7 - 5.0 6.8 330 Years
Sargent- Berrocal
Berrocal
System Monta 2 Miles 2.0 - 3.0 6.8 2400 Years
Vista-
Shannon
GOAL A REDUCED RISKS ASSOCIATED VIIITIt GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC
HAZARDS
The following policies will be implemented during the development review
process, as regulating new development offers the greatest rewards in risk reduc-
tion. While it is difficult to improve existing development, it is much easier to lo-
cate and design new buildings to achieve this goal.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-5
(insert Figure 6-B. Seismic and Geological Hazards fold-out map)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
-~
U..t 1/
-_ftE
6-6
HEALTH AND SAFETY
(back of Figure 6-B)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Policy 6-1: Seismic/Geologic Review Process
Evaluate new development proposals within mapped potential hazard
zones using a formal seismic/ geologic review process. Use Table 6-D of
this Hazards Analysis to determine the level of review required.
Strategies
1.
Acceptable level of Risk. Uoe TaBle Ii C reganling acceptaèle levÐJ af risk
to identify reasonaàle le'.'els of risk for '¡arious land uses. The table iRcludes
geFleral SRuCtural risk reducing desigr¡ critcria for cach lm'ld »se group.
Encourage developers to consult with design professionals regarding per-
formance-based design to achieve levels of safety that exceed the Uniform
Building Code. The design criteria should be the maximum credible
earthquake for that site. Hazardous materials use and storage facilities
should aim for the highest level of seismic resistance.
Geotechnical and Structural Analysis. Use TaBle á C to fiRd tHe neeessary
geateelæ.ical and structural analysis eased on ilie J3roposed location of a de
yelopmeflt in a sJ3€cific hazard zone.
Require all developers to provide geotechnical analyses in keeping with
the California Environmental Quality Act requirements of the State of
California. In addition, require any site with a slope exceeding 10% to ref-
erence the Landslide Hazard Potential Zone maps of the State of Califor-
nia. [Remove Table 6-C: it does not provide any guidance on geotech
studies.l
Earthquake-Resistant Design Techniques. Encourage new earthquake-
resistant design techniques in the design and structural engineering of
buildings.
2.
3.
4.
Residential Construction Standards Upgrade. Review construction stan-
dards for residences to reduce earthquake damage. Examples include addi-
tional bracing for garage openings of two-story and split-level homes and
increased first story bracing in multiple-family residences over parking ga-
rages. Encourage property owners to upgraded standards in these situa-
tions.
Require that any residential facility that is being increased more than 50% in
price, or more than 50% in size, conform to the building code then in exis-
tence throughout the entire structure. Owners of residential buildings with
known structural defects, such as un-reinforced garage openings, "Soft first
story" construction, unbolted foundations, or inadequate sheer walls are en-
couraged to take steps to remedy the problem and bring their buildings up
to the current building code.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
6-7
~
-;/;:\\'L
'Co ,I t "
~
6-8
HEALTH AND SAFETY
It may not be practical to improve several types of buildings to incorporate
revised earthquake safety standards. Fortunately, most buildings in Cupertino
have been constructed in recent years and were designed under a building code
that includes components and designs that resist ground shaking.
Still, structures identified as "critical facilities" should be re-evaluated, es-
pecially those in the high-hazard zones. Many seismic safety evaluations have
been completed. Cupertino's schools comply with legal standards complied with
the Field Act at the time they were built comply with le¡;al standards. The State
Department of Transportation (DOT) has a priority program to reinforce all
freeways. Route 85 was built under current seismic resistance standards, and the
De Anza overcrossing was redesigned to current standards when it was wid-
ened. DOT is reviewing other freeway over-crossings to determine if they need
additional work. to see how resistaRt tRey are te grolffid shaking.
A City mandate to evaluate the structural integrity of all non-critical public
or private buildings is not economically viable, but City government should edu-
cate residents, employers, and business owners to protect their property and re-
duce risk of injury.
ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF RISK
Land use and building design standards must relate to the degree of geo-
logic and seismic hazards in the zone in which a proposed project would be built
so that an acceptable level of risk can be assigned. City Planning staff will work
with developers to ensure that all CEQA requirements are met, and to encourage
performance based design to exceed life safety only, and to seek to achieve con-
tinuing functionality of critical infrastructure and facilities where hazardous ma-
terials and hazardous wastes are used or stored. Table á C shows an acceptable
le'lel of risk for se','enland Hse categories. The foar le'lcIs of acceptable risk range
from e)(treme1y løw to ørdinary. B)(tremely low risk is assigned tø \'ital strue
tares, stich as a large dam or a pHBlic Htility facility. ,'\R erdinary risk category is
assigned te BHildffigs such as single family heus"$, warehouses afld ÍMm Build
ings. The Table alse shows the possible additiønal. cost øf measures te reduce risk
and ideRtHies the level of pretection for life and preperty.
LaREl use in the e)(tremely low risk category must achieve ma)(HnUIR safety.
For e)(ample, ðte'.'cns Creek Reser-/Oir must be designed te rcmaiR teta1ly fufl€
tioRa!. during the worst pessible eartRqua1<e. Those impronmeffis must Be made
at any eøst; there is nø perŒntage of east assøeiat-cd with structural safety im
provcments. OrdiRary risk reduction acwlities may add aBeut 2 te 10 percent tø
prøject cost in order to achieve the desired leyel øf saf-cty.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-9
Table 6-C Acceptable Exposure to Risk Related to Various Land Uses.
Land uses and structural types are arranged below according to the level of exposure to acceptable risk appro-
priate to each group: the lowest level of exposure to acceptable risk should be allowed for Group 1 and the
highest level of exposure to acceptable risk for Group 7.
-Acceptable
Exposure
To Risk
Land Use
Group
EXTREMELY
LOW
Group 1 VULNERABLE STRUCTURES (nuclear
reactors. large dams, plants manufact-
uring/ storing hazardous materials)
Group 2 VITAL PUBLIC UTILITIES, (electrical
transmission interties/substantions,
regional water pipelines. treatment
plants. gas mains)
Group 3 COMMUNICATIONITRANSPORTATION
(airports, telephones. bridges, freeways,
evac. routes)
SMALL WATER RETENTION
STRUCTURES
EMERGENCY CENTERS (hospitals,
fire/police stations. post-earthquake aide
stations. schools. CIty Hall and Service Center,
De Anza College)
Group 4 INVOLUNTARY OCCUPANCY
FACILITiES (schools. prisons.
convalescent and nursing homes)
HIGH OCCUPANCY BUILDINGS
(theaters. hotels. large office/apartment bldgs.)
MODERATELY Group 5 PUBLIC UTILITIES. (electrical feeder
LOW routes, water supply turnout lines,
sewage lines)
FACILITIES IMPORTANT TO LOCAL
ECONOMY
ORDINARY Group 6 MINOR TRANSPORTATlOJII(arterials
RISK LEVEL and parkways)
LOW-MODERATE OCCUPANCY
BUILDINGS (small apartment bldgs.,
single-lam. resid.. motels. small
commerciel/offlce bldgs.)
Group 7 VERY LOW OCCUPANCY BUILDINGS
OPEN SPACE & RECREATION AREAS
Extra Project Cost To
Reduce Risk To
Acceptable Level
As required for maximum
attainable safety
Design as needed to remain
functional after max. prob.
earthquake on local faults
5% to 25% of project cost
Design as needed to remain
functional after max. prob.
earthquake on local faults
5% to 25% of project cost
Design to minimize injury, loss of
life during maximum probable
earthquake on local faults: need
not design to remain functional
2% of project cost; to 1 0%
project cost in extreme cases
DesiQl> to resist minor earthquakes
(warehouses, larm structures) wlo
damage: resist mod. Earthquakes
wlo strue. damage.with some non-
struet. damage; resist major
earthquake (max. prob. on local
~"
{L\.~
~
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
6-10
HEALTH AND SAFETY
(farm land, landfills, wildlife areas)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
fauits) WiD collapse, allowing some
strue. & non-strue. damage
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-11
Table 6-D shows a policy position on the amount of technical evaluation
needed to ensure that hazards in new developments are reduced to an acceptable
level of risk based on land use. Critical facilities in Cupertino's planning area
should be evaluated and modified structurally to withstand a maximum earth-
quake.
Table 6-D. Technical Investigations Required based on Acceptable Risk.
Land Use Activity Hazard Zone Map Symbol
F D L H I V
Evaluation Required Evaluation Required
Groups 1 to 4 UBC UBC
Soils Soils
Geology Seismic Hazard
Seismic Hazard
Groups 5 to 7 UBC UBC
Soils Soils
Geology
Descriptions of Technical Evaltmtions:
UBC
1997 (or latest City adopted) Edition, Uniform Building
Code
Geology
Soils and foundation investigation to determine ability of
local soil conditions to support structures
Determine subsidence potential, faulting hazard, slope sta-
bility (See Geologic Hazards Map for additional detail)
Soils
Seismic Hazard
Detailed Soils/Structural evaluation to certify adequacy of
normal UBC earthquake regulations or to recommend more
stringent measures
Vital facilities, such as fire stations and water mains, must remain intact
during the worst probable earthquake on any fault system in Cupertino. Most of
these facilities are owned by printe compar,ies or public agencies beyond direct
City control. Owners l"eed to evaluate the facilities in terms of thcir potential to
disrupt "e,,¡ice or cause hazard to Cupertino residents. Cupertino City Hall is the
pÜmar) emergel"cy operations center for coordinating and managing al1 typcs of
disasters including earthquakes. The City must be sure that critical parts of tl~e
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
.~
tl ' ¿)
~
6-12
HEALTH AND SAFETY
water system co." 'sithstand a mmdmum earthquake so that therc will bc suffi
eient water to dritok and fight fires.
The State of California and its local governments have developed a variety of
building codes to prevent loss of life in the maximum, credible earthquake. It is
the policy of the City of Cupertino to endorse performance based design of all
structures to encourage functionality after the maximum, credible earthquake.
While every earthquake is unique, and the specific shaking intensity at a given
site cannot be exactly predicted. facilities that relate to the provision of essential
health and safety services should be designed and built to achieve post-
earthquake functionality.
Policy 6-2: Public Educ¡;¡tion on Seismk Safety
Reinforce the existing public education program to help residents reduce
earthquake hazards.
Strategies
1.
Covenant on Seismic Risk. Require developers to record a covenant to
tell future residents in high-risk areas about the risk and inform them that
more information is in City Hall records. This is in addition to the State
requirement that information on the geological report is recorded on the
face of subdivision maps.
Emergency Preparedness. Publish and promote emergency preparedness
activities and drills. Use the Cupertino Scene and website to provide
safety tips that may include identifying and correcting household haz-
ards, knowing how and when to turn off utilities, helping family mem-
bers protect themselves during and after an earthquake, recommending
neighborhood preparation activities, and advising residents to maintain
an emergency supply kit containing first-aid supplies, food, drinking wa-
ter and battery operated radios and flashlights.
2.
3.
Neighborhood Response Groups. Encourage participation in Commu-
nity Emergency Response Team (CERT) training. Train neighborhood
groups to care for themselves during disasters. Assist in neighborhood
drills.
4.
Dependent Populations. Encourage operators,' Ðwners Ðf lmilàiHgs witR
dependent populatioRs sHcli as day care ceRtem, sclloels, residential day
eare and cew.-alescem homes te prepare thek buiJ.diRgs and diems
through an emergency plan, training, drills arid client edHcation.
Actively cooperate with State agencies that oversee facilities for vulner-
able populations, to ensure that such facilities conform to all health and
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-13
safety requirements, includin~ emergency planning. training, exercises
and employee education.
5.
Foreign Language Emergency Information. Obtain translated emergency
preparedness materials and make them available to appropriate foreign
language populations.
Fire Hazards
The City of Cupertino endeavors to provide its citizens with fire and emer-
gency services of the highest standards. This makes Cupertino an attractive and
safe place in which to live and do business.
Cupertino's geographical boundaries extend from the lower foothills of the
Santa Cruz Mountain Range at its westerly limits to the urbanized valley floor at
its northerly, easterly and southerly limits. For this reason, Cupertino is exposed
to hazards from both wild and urban fires. These two types of fire hazards have
their own unique characteristics and present different fire-fighting problems.
Wild fires are a threat to residents living in the rural areas of the foothills, If not
contained, wild fires can have a devastating effect on a community, causing inju-
ries and consuming vegetation and structures in their path. Urban fires pose
other problems. They may include fires in high-rise buildings, multiple residen-
tial structures, or fires in commercial and industrial buildings where highly
flammable and toxic materials may be stored.
Fire fighting and emergency medical services are provided to the City of
Cupertino by the Santa Clara County Fire Department (SCCFD) (formerly known
as the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District). The Santa Oara
County Fire Department is a full service department, which provides similar ser-
vices to seven other west valley cities and adjacent County areas. Automatic aid
agreements with the neighboring jurisdictions augment the SCCFD's fire re-
sponse capabilities, and the City of Cupertino is a beneficiary of these expanded
capabilities.
In addition to fire protection, the SCCFD also conducts fire prevention in-
spections and educational programs, including those on Community Emergency
Response Team (CERT) training, cardia-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and first
aid certification
Cupertino's growth over the next 20 years will be accommodated within
Cupertino's existing urban service area, and there will not be a need to expand
the existing service area. This new growth, however, may generate greater de-
mands on the existing fire services. A needs assessment may have to be con-
ducted by the SCCFD to determine the ability to continue to provide the same
level of service.
The City's and the SCCFD'S common goal is to maintain a high level of
service. One of the most important measurements in the level of service is re-
sponse time. Response time is critical for life safety and for minimizing property
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
~
r~
6-14
HEALTH AND SAFETY
damage. It is the policy of the SCCFD to respond to 90% of emergency calls in
under five minutes.
A radius of one and one-half miles is considered to be the ideal service area
for a fire station. However, this is not necessarily an absolute standard because
there could be conditions that may affect the radius of the service area, e.g., an
area developed with large number of commercial and industrial buildings may
require a service area of only three quarters of a mile radius, while for a rural en-
vironment of single-family and two-family houses a service area of three to four
miles, or more, may be acceptable. Figure 6-C, Fire Service Area Boundaries Map
shows the distances from the three SCCFD fire stations.
The Map illustrates that the major portion of the community is within a one
and one-half mile radius from a fire station. These distances determine potential
response time; however, sometimes response time may be affected by traffic
congestion and other problems.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-15
(insert Figure 6-E. Fire Service Area Boundaries fold-out map)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
~
-(lL'.v
...~
6-16
HEALTH AND SAFETY
(back of Figure 6-C)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
One of the major goals of fire service is to reduce response time, but this
goal may sometimes conflict with City policies, e. g., the City's policy of discour-
aging commute traffic from driving through neighborhoods may delay response
time by making it difficult for fire equipment to use direct routes. The use of pri-
vate security systems, such as electronically operated entry gates, for planned
residential communities may also delay response time. The use of these security
measures must be looked at carefully.
An increase in calls for fire service and traffic congestion can also erode the
Fire Department's critical response time. To compensate, the Fire Department
may need to adjust and/ or expand staff and equipment in areas of high service
demand and continue its program for placing emergency traffic preemption con-
trols at key traffic signals.
Potential Fire Hazards
FIRE HAZARDS IN THE FOOTHILLS AND MOUNTAINS
People who live in the foothi11s and mountains of Cupertino's planning
area are most at risk from fire. The City is not directly involved in fire fighting in
the mountains, but fire safety in the Montebello Ridge and Stevens Canyon area
is of extreme importance to Cupertino. Major fires in this area could harm the
Stevens Creek watershed by increasing flooding potential, silting up streambeds
and reducing recreational opportunities.
The vegetative cover, the degree of slope and critically dry weather condi-
tions are the three natural factors the Califomia Division of Forestry uses to clas-
sify the severity of potential fires in the foothills. Development in the foothills is
typically low density and scattered throughout the area, making fire protection
difficult. The degree of hazard to life and property in these areas is affected not
only by the fire itself but also by other factors, such as, access roads for fire-
fighting and evacuation, the available strength of fire fighting force, the availabil-
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFr GENERAL PLAN
6-17
Santa Clara
COmity Fire
Station, Stevens
Creek Boulevard
-lit\
_.~
6-18
HEALTH AND SAFETY
ity of water to fight the fire and the effectiveness of building codes and inspec-
tion of developments in the fire hazards areas.
There are about 16 square miles of land in the mountains of the Cupertino
planning area. Any increase in density raises the exposure to fire risks. In 1992,
all properties above the 10% slope line were categorized as Hazardous Fire Ar-
eas, i.e., land that is covered with grass, brush or forest, and which is also diffi-
cult to access. Structures within this area are required to have fire retardant
(Class A) roofing, and property owners are required to continuously clear any
brush away from their structures. Such structures are also required to have
sprinklers. If a fire were to start in this area, it would be abnormally difficult to
suppress.
Most of the mountainous land is owned by either the Midpeninsula Re-
gional Open Space District or the Santa Clara County Parks System. When the
parks are fully active, many people could be exposed to fire risk.
GOAL B
EFRCIENT AND EFFECl1VE ARE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES TO
PROTECT THE COMMUNITY FROM HAZARDS ASSOCIAlED WITH WILD
AND URBAN ARES
Policy 6-3: Wild Fire Prevention Efforts
Coordinate wild fire prevention efforts with adjacent jurisdictions.
Policy 6-4: County Fire Hazard Reduäion
Encourage the County to put into effect the fire reduction policies of the
County Public Safety Element.
Policy 6-5: Fuel Managenwnt to Reduce Fire Hazard
Encourage the Midpeninsula Open Space District and the County Parks
Department to continue efforts in fuel management to reduce fire haz-
ards.
Policy 6-6: Green Fire Breaks
Encourage the Midpeninsula Open Space District to consider "green"
fire break uses for open space lands.
FIRE HAZARDS IN THE URBANIZED VALLEY FLOOR
Most people who live and work in the urbanized areas of Cupertino are not
exposed to a high risk of fire. The City is served by a well-managed fire protec-
tion service as well as a fire prevention program. Buildings in the City are rela-
tively new and there is a strong code enforcement program, an adequate water
supply and a well-maintained delivery system. However, there are some geo-
graphical areas in the City to which more attention could be directed to reduce
potential fire hazards. In urban areas the most serious concern is fires in high-
rise, multiple-family dwellings and commercial and industrial structures con-
taining highly combustible or toxic materials.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-19
GOALC
FIRE PREVEIß1VE MEASURES THAT _IMIZE THE LOSS OF lIFE AND
PROPERTY
Policy 6- 7: Early Project Review
Involve the FiTe Department in the early design stage of all projects re-
quiTing public review to assure FiTe Department input and modifications
as needed.
Policy 6-8: CommercÚlI and Industrial fire Protection Guidelines
Coordinate with the FiTe Department to develop new guidelines for fiTe
protection for commercial and industrial land uses.
Policy 6-9: fire Prevention and Emergency Preparedness
Promote fire prevention and emergency preparedness through city-
initiated public education programs, through the government televi-
sion channel, the Internet and the Cupertino Scene.
Policy 6-10: Multi-Story Buildings fire Risks
Recognize that multi-story buildings of any land use type increase risks
of fiTe. Ensure that adequate fire protection is built into the design and
requiTe on-site fire suppression materials and equipment to ensure the
safety of the community.
Policy 6-11: Residential fire Sprinklers Ordinance
Consider adopting a residential fiTe sprinkler ordinance. This will re-
duce both fiTe flows and the need for firefighting personnel and
equipment.
Policy 6-12: Smoke Detectors
Re<¡like smoke detect-ors in flew resiàenêal ceastmcâofl aaà eeRtÎRtie
to SUt'pert fuoe fJre~eeâÐfI agencies' eàucatÍOR of hoHl€ow'flers OR ifu¡ta!
latiofl of smeke detectors. Require smoke detectors in all new residen-
tial units. and in all residential units at time of sale or rental. in
conformance with State law. Continue to Use the Cupertino Scene to
publicize fiTe hazards correction methods.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
'~'
, .It
-l,J(\L ¿.
¡ "
...~.
6-20
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Policy 6-12A: Wood Shake Roof Abatement
Adopt an aggressive wood shake roof abatement program to require that
any roof that is 25% or more replaced must use fire retardant materials for all re-
placement shakes. Wood shake roofs have been outlawed in California because
of their likelihood to catch fire from external sources, such as burning embers
from chirrmeys. The law already requires fire resistant shakes on any roof that is
50% or more repaired or replaced.
BUILDING CODES, FIRE CODES AND OTHER REGULATIONS
To minimize potential fire hazards, the City of Cupertino regulates build-
ing construction and site planning through the Uniform Fire Code and the Uni-
form Building Code. Cupertino's large commercial and industrial buildings are
designed with substantial areas of open space around them to preclude the
spread of fire. The City also requires automatic sprinklers and fire detection sys-
tems to further reduce risks.
In addition, the City and the Fire Department perioclically inspect commer-
cial and industrial buildings for compliance with the applicable codes. Single-
family homes do not require inspection, but smoke alarms are required in all
new homes constructed in the City. The City also supports the retrofitting of ex-
isting homes with smoke detectors
Under the Uniform Fire Code, undeveloped or sparsely developed areas
possessing characteristics for potentially high fire risk may be designated haz-
ardous fire areas. In such areas, the Code regulates building materials, planting
material and clearances between structures and planting material. The County
Fire Marshal and the Fire Department regulate activities in the fire hazard area,
and have the authority to deny access to the public to any area if they determine
it is in the interest of public safety. They also administer the Weed Abatement
and Brush Clearance Ordinance in the hazardous fire areas. The purpose of this
Ordinance is to minimize the potential of transference of brush fires and to re-
duce the potential accidental fires.
The City of Cupertino has a good safety record in terms of fire protection
and a minimum of fire losses. This record is reflected in the City's excellent fire
insurance rating of Class 2 (Gass 1 is considered a perfect rating). This low level
of risk is the combined result of the high proportion of new construction which
meets current Uniform Building Code standards, and efficient fire protection
service.
Constraints to Firefighting
ACCESS ROADS
Access is a critical component of fire safety. Fire fighting equipment must
be able to reach the location of the fire as quickly as possible. Likewise, viable
means must be provided for residents and visitors alike to escape the dangers of
a fire.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-21
Public road access is severely limited in the hillside rural areas. Emergency
access roads run through private property and these property owners are asked
to act independently or collectively to maintain fire access roads. Fire equipment
needs roads that are passable, have less than 16% grade, a minimum turning ra-
dius of 42 feet and sufficient space to turn around.
Santa Oara County lists the Montebello Road/Stevens Canyon area as the
fourth highest risk in the County. The road linking Montebello and the Palo Alto
Sphere of Influence to the bottom of Stevens Canyon has been improved to ac-
ceptable standards as a fire access road. A fire trail extends from Skyline Boule-
vard on Charcoal Road to Stevens Canyon.
Road accessibility in the lower foothilIs is easier. The City requires that all-
emergency roads be constructed with an all weather surface. It also requires a
private emergency access connection between public streets within Lindy Can-
yon and Regnart Canyon. However, private roads are less likely to meet the ac-
cess standards. Private roads are not required to be constructed to City standards
and, therefore, are usually built to lesser standards than public roads. Moreover,
there are no long-term guarantees that they will be maintained.
Dead end roads are risky, especially those long dead end roads that give
access to many portions of Regnart Road and Stevens Canyon areas. For this rea-
son, alternate access routes are provided via private emergency access routes.
GOAL D
AN ALL WEATHER EMERGENCY ROAD SYSTEM TO SERVE THE RURAL
AREAS
Policy 6-13: Roadway Design
Involve the Fire Department in the design of public roadways for re-
view and comments. Attempt to ensure that roadways have frequent
median breaks for timely access to properties.
Policy 6-14: Dead-End Street Access
Allow public use of private roadways during an emergency for hillside
subdivisions that have dead-end public streets longer than 1,000 feet or
find a secondary means of access.
Policy 6-15: Hillside Access Routes
Require new hillside development to have frequent grade breaks in ac-
cess routes to ensure a timely response from fire personnel.
Policy 6-16: Hillside Road Upgrades
Require new hillside development to upgrade existing access roads to
meet Fire Code and City standards.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
-~
..
6-22
HEALTH AND SAFETY
ACCESS TO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS
Fire and other emergency personnel may be impeded if there are vehicular
electronic security gates on residential developments. Therefore, vehicular elec-
tronic security gates should be discouraged unless they comply with the General
Plan and receive a fence exception. All vehicular electronic security gates should
meet the requirements of the emergency service agencies, and attempts should
be made to standardize access.
Policy 6-17: Private ResÏlkntial Electronic Security Gates
Discourage the use of private residential electronic security gates that
act as a barrier to emergency personnel.
Strategies
1.
Fence Exception: Require a fence exception for electronic security gates.
[Margin note: See Chapter 16.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code]
2.
Access to Gates. Where electronic security gates are allowed, require the
installation of an approved key switch.
Water Availability
Assuring water availability to the more remote areas in and around Cuper-
tino is important to achieving a safe community.
WATER SUPPLY ON MONTEBELLO RIDGE AND STEVENS CANYON
Presently, there are no water systems serving the Montebello Road and up-
per Stevens Canyon area, with the exception of Stevens Creek itself. Because
there is no water service to these areas, the County requires that each homesite
be served by its own individual10,OOO-gallon tank and that a sprinkler system be
installed. Theoretically, it is possible to have a jointly owned and operated water
storage system to reduce the required amount of on-site storage of waterfor each
individual property, provided an adequate water main distribution system to
serve all homes sharing the joint facility is in place. However, the maintenance
and operation costs of such a system could impose an economic burden on the
homeowners if there were not enough properties within the system to make the
individual share for defraying the costs reasonable. Former private systems in
the area proved to be unsuccessful and were ultimately annexed to the major wa-
ter providers in the area.
WATER SUPPLY FOR FOOTHILL REGIONS WITHIN THE URBAN SERVICE AREA
All development in the Urban Service Area must be served by a water sys-
tem that complies with City standards for household and firefighting use.
Presently, a few developed areas, such as lots in the upper reach of Regnart
Canyon and a few areas in Inspiration Heights, do not have an adequate water
system. However, in the long-term, these areas may receive a better supply of
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-23
water for fighting fires, as the water system is extended to serve new develop-
ment in the area and the water providers in the area expand their service area to
serve new growth in the area.
GOAL E
AVAILABLE WATER SERVICE IN THE HILLSIDE AND CANYON AREAS
Policy-18: Extension of Water Service
Encourage the water companies to extend water service into the hill-
side and canyon areas.
Policy 6-19: Growth Cooperation
Encourage cooperation between water utility companies and the Fire
Department in order to keep water systems in pace with growth and
firefighting service needs.
Policy 6-20: fire fighting Upgrades Needs
Encourage utilities to consider Fire Department firefighting needs
when upgrading water systems.
WATER SUPPLY FOR FOOTHILL REGIONS
Accessibility and availability to an adequate supply of water is extremely
important in firefighting. The City of Cupertino is served by two water retailers,
which also serve the foothill areas: the San Jose Water Company, which leased
the Cupertino Municipal Water System and annexed the Reglin Mutual Water
System, and the Califomia Water Company (see Figure 6-D). Together these two
systems have adequate water lines and distribution systems to meet the fire flow
needs. However, although they meet the present needs, neither private water
system is required to maintain an adequate fire flow under their agreements with
the City and fire agencies.
The City of Cupertino has taken a number of steps to combat fire hazards.
It adopted the current State Fire Code, and declared most of the Santa Cruz
Mountain range as hazardous fire areas. It has also adopted the following pre-
ventive measures: 1) An early review process with the Fire Department and the
City is conducted to incorporate fire prevention methods. 2) the City reviews
building plans and requires use of fire resistant materials. 3) The City also coor-
dinates with and encourages the County of Santa Oara to uphold the weed
abatement program.
Policy 6-21: Residential Fire Sprinklers
Require fire sprinklers in new residential construction located in hill-
side areas and flag lots.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFf GENERAL PLAN
-~
-~
6-24
HEALTH AND SAFETY
(insert Figure 6-D. Water Service Map here)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALlli AND SAFETY
6-25
Crime and Police Services
The sociological climate of a community is of extreme importance to its vi-
ability as a desirable place to live and work. Residents must be able to carry out
their routine activities and enjoy the community's assets in an environment free
of worries about their well being. Businesses must also feel comfortable and se-
cure in the conduct of their activities and ensured that their investments are pro-
tected.
The City's commitment to public safety encompasses two broad areas of re-
sponsibilities: 1) to provide public safety services and the planning necessary for
the prevention of crime, and 2) to plan for a safe environment in which the public
is not exposed to unnecessary risks to life an property. Cupertino has a very low
crime rate, which can be partially attributed to project design techniques and ac-
tive community involvement. However, changes in future development patterns
and an increase in both employment and housing opportunities may affect pub-
lic safety. An expansion in the retail sector may increase opportunities for thefts
and other related criminal activities. An increase in growth may also result in
additional vehicular traffic, which increases the risk of automobile accidents.
These future changes may reflect a need for additional public safety services.
The City recognizes the sociological and psychological effects of the physi-
cal environment on human behavior and conducts pre-hearing review meetings
for all new projects. This occurs early in the planning process and involves the
Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, commenting on safety issues. In addi-
tion to this early involvement in the planning process, the Santa Clara County
Sheriff Department provides Cupertino with a full spectrum of police services,
which include: police patrol services, criminal investigation, traffic enforcement,
accident investigation and tactical teams.
PARK DESIGN
Neighborhood and Community Parks provide open space and recreational
opportunities for Cupertino's families. Open space offers a respite from the busy
urban environment and present opportunities for people to engage in physical
recreational activities. However, parks must safe to be enjoyed. Families must be
free of worry about the well being of both adults and children who use the facili-
ties.
Future parks will be designed by using the principles of "defensible space."
They will be easily accessible from streets, where feasible, to allow neighbors and
the police maximum visibility into the park from the peripheral areas. They will
also take into consideration design techniques to minimize potential vandalism
and crime.
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN FOR DEFENSIBLE SPACE
Cupertino's General Plan stresses protection of visual privacy. This could
conflict with the concept of "defensible space," if privacy design techniques iso-
late households enough so that people feel they are losing private and seIni-
private spaces in residential developments. Design can also be used to create so-
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
.~~-:
-Í'j~~ "L,
Lt.-!",,>
.-..
6-26
HEALTH AND SAFETY
cial cohesion, important not only for a planned residential commuIÚty, but in
single-family detached homes as well. Cupertino actively supports a Neighbor-
hood Watch Program that offers advice on crime prevention and encourages
neighborhood cohesiveness.
NON-RESIDENTIAL DESIGN FOR DEFENSIBLE SPACE
Using design techniques to prevent crime in non-residential districts is more
prevalent than in residential areas. The key is to design buildings to ease police
patrol and help community surveillance. Decisions on crime prevention involve
tradeoffs between aesthetics and the ease of access for patrol vehicles, as well as
tradeoffs between privacy and acoustical protection between commercial proper-
ties and adjacent homes.
Commercial office and industrial properties designed with interior garden
courts, with private fenced patios and isolated entrances, have more burglaries
and robberies than those that are highly visible. Masomy barriers, earth mounds
and landscaping beds are typically used to isolate parking lot noise in commer-
cial operations. The County Sheriff's Office believes that these solutions do not
increase burglary in adjoining homes.
GOAL F
HIGH QUALITY POLICE SERVICES THAT MAINTAIN THE COMMUNITY'S
CRIME RATE LOW AND ENSURE A HIGH LEVEL OF PUBUC SAFETY
Policy 6-22: Neighborhood Awareness Programs
Support the Neighborhood Watch Program and others intended to help
neighborhoods prevent crime through social interaction.
Policy 6-23: Public Perimeter Roads for Parks
Encircle neighborhood parks with a public road to provide visual accessibil-
ity whenever possible.
Policy 6-24: CriWU! Prevention in Building Design
Consider the relationship between building design and crime prevention in
reviewing all developments.
Polky 6-25: Fiscal Impacts
Recognize fiscal impacts to the County Sheriff and City of Cupertino when
approving various land use mixes.
Policy 6-26: Pre-hearing Review
Continue to request County Sheriff review and comment on development
applications for security measures.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAY[ GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-27
Hazardous Materials
Hazardous materials pose a danger to public health and safety. They en-
compass a broad range of substances, including materials that are toxic, flanuna-
ble, explosive or corrosive. Yet these materials are recognized as an integral part
of society, used to produce manufactured goods that contribute to our economic
well being and quality of life.
Hazardous materials are used in manufacturing processes in Santa Clara
County and are also part of our everyday life in the form of household chemicals,
such as pesticides, motor oil, cleaners and paints. The use, storage and disposal
of hazardous materials, including management of contaminated soils and
groundwater are regulated by federal, state and local laws and regulations. The
transportation, distribution, storage and disposal of hazardous materials is of
great concern to Cupertino. The City has adopted a Hazardous Materials Ordi-
nance that regulates the storage of these materials in solid and liquid form. The
City's Toxic Gas Ordinance regulates the storage of these materials that are in
gaseous form.
ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS (EMF)
Over the past 20 years, concern has been expressed about the potential ef-
fects associated with electromagnetic fields from such sources as transmission
lines, electrical facilities, antennae and appliances.
A number of studies have been conducted to determine potential links be-
tween EMF levels and their effects on health. Many of these studies have been
controversial and inconclusive, and experts have not agreed on a definitive an-
swer, although many in the international community now consider EMF to be a
possible human carcinogen, relating exposure to elevated magnetic fields to a
small increase in the risk of childhood leukemia. Although the potential effects of
EMF on health have not been conclusively demonstrated, it is recommended that
the planning review process be expanded to include a review of potential EMF
sources to ensure that their effects, if any, could not impact residential develop-
ments or child care facilities.
GOAL G
PROTEC110N FROM THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS AND EXPOSURE TO ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS
Policy 6-27: Hazardous Materials Storage and Disposal
Require the proper storage and disposal of hazardous materials to pre-
vent leakage, potential explosions, fire or the release of harmful fumes.
Policy 6-28: Proximity of Residents to Hazardous Materials
Assess future residents' exposure to hazardous materials when new resi-
dential development of childcare facilities are proposed in existing indus-
trial and manufacturing areas. Do not allow residential development if
such hazardous conditions cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level of
risk.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
-Ut\
-~
6-28
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Policy 6-29: Electrol1Ulgnetic Fields
Consider potential hazards from Electromagnetic Fields in the project re-
view process.
Hazardous Waste
In the past, the managing of hazardous waste has relied heavily upon land
disposal of untreated hazardous wastes. This approach sometimes led to the con-
tamination of both soil and groundwater and is now prohibited. Since 1990, State
law has required that hazardous waste must be properly disposed of in ap-
proved hazardous waste treatment or disposal facilities. To accomplish this, new
treatment methods and facilities had to be developed and approved to pre-treat
hazardous waste before its final disposal
Under authority of the 1986 "Tanner" Bill (AB2948), Cupertino, along with
13 other cities, joined the County to jointly develop a comprehensive and coordi-
nated planning approach to hazardous waste disposal. The County's Hazardous
Waste Management Plan (CoHWMP) was endorsed by the Cupertino City
Council in 1990.
The CoHWMP directed the County to work with the cities to develop a
program to provide residents and small businesses the opportunity to properly
dispose of hazardous waste. In 1990, the County and the cities created a county-
wide Household Hazardous Waste Program, in which Cupertino participates.
Policy 6-30: Alternative Products
Encourage residents and businesses to use non- and less-hazardous
products, especially less toxic pest control products, to slow the genera-
tion of new hazardous waste requiring disposal through the county-wide
program.
Policy 6-31: Household Hazardous Wastes
Support and help fund the County-wide Household Hazardous Waste
Program, to provide residential and small business communities the op-
portunity to properly dispose of hazardous waste.
Strategy
Educational Materials. Publish educational materials about the program
in the Cupertino Scene, website and in brochures that are distributed
throughout the community.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALlli AND SAFETY
6-29
Policy 6-32: Hazardous Waste Dumping
Inform the residential and business communities about the illegality and
danger of dumping hazardous material and waste in the storm drain sys-
tem or in creeks.
Strategy
Code Enforcement. Enforce illegal dumping through code enforcement
personnel.
The City is required to identify generalized locations where hazardous
waste management facilities could be placed. Figure 6-G on page 29 describes
these generalized industrial locations, but does not necessarily ensure that any
particular treatment/ disposal facility could be placed in the locations consistent
with siting criteria in the County or City HWMP.
Facilities that could typically be placed on sites of the scale available in Cu-
pertino would generally emphasize reclamation or recycling of waste products.
However, other TSD (Transfer, Storage or Disposal) facilities could include
equipment for stabilization of liquid or gaseous contaminants prior to ultimate
disposal outside the City, facilities for reduction or oxidation of compound mate-
rials from temporary to permanent storage containers.
There are no sites in Cupertino suitable to the development of a residuals
repository facility, due to the large-scale site requirements and region-serving
nature of such facilities.
CITY OF CuPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
-m\
m~
6-30
HEALTH AND SAFETY
(insert Figure 6-E-Generalized Location of Potential Hazardous Waste
Management Sites here)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Disaster Planning
Disaster Planning is a continuous cycle of preparation, response, recovery
and mitigation. Emergency Management attempts to incorporate these ideas into
each of its functional elements: emergency planning, coordination, training and
public education.
State law requires that cities prepare an emergency plan to respond to natu-
ral or human-caused disasters that threaten the lives, property or environment of
the community. The Cupertino Emergency Plan establishes an organizational
framework to enable the City to manage its emergency response activities and to
coordinate with county, state and federal agencies.
GOALJ
A HIGH LEVEL OF EMERGENCY PREAREDNESS TO COPE WITH BOlli
NA ruRAL OR HUMAN-CAUSED DISASTERS
Policy 6-33: Promote Emergency Preparedness
Distribute multi-hazard emergency preparedness information for all
threats identified in the emergency plan. Irúormation will be provided
through Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), First Aid and Commu-
nity Emergency Response Team (CERT) training, lectures and seminars
on emergency preparedness, publication of monthly safety articles in the
Cupertino Scene, posting of information on the Emergency Preparedness
website and coordination of video and printed information at the library.
THE CUPERTINO EMERGENCY PLAN
"The City's Emergency Plan has been prepared in accordance with the
Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) and is used in conjunc-
tion with the State Emergency Plan, the Santa Oara Operational Area Interim
Agreement, Santa Oara County Emergency Plan, as well as plans and SOPs of
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
6-31
(Photo œption
lrere)
~l
-j1l-~
(L- ,,',
....
6-32
HEALTH AND SAFETY
contract agencies and special districts." Within this system, the City Manager is
the Director of Emergency Services when a local emergency exists. Support per-
sonnel such as City Staff, representatives from Public Safety, special districts and
volunteer groups are trained to perform specific functions in the Emergency Op-
erations Center. These functions include Management, Operations, Logistics,
Planning/Intelligence and Finance.
There are two. parts to the Emergency Plan. The first part includes legal re-
quirements and program explanations. The second part addresses the functional
responsibilities and checklists of the representatives of the Emergency Opera-
tions Center. The plan is reviewed annually and tested through annual disaster
drills.
CITY EMPLOYEES AS DISASTER SERVICE WORKERS
During emergencies, all City employees are designated Disaster Service
Workers, under Section 3100 of the Califomia Government Code, and are re-
quired to remain at work as long as they are needed. To help prepare for this ad-
ditional responsibility, all employees receive training in personal and home
preparedness, First Aid, CPR, SEMS and Terrorism Awareness. The City pro-
vides opportunities for employees to purchase discount preparedness supplies
and offers additional free disaster training through the Community Emergency
Response Team program.
Policy 6-34: E11U!rgem:y ServiCE Training Program
Train employees in disaster preparedness, first aid and CPR.
Strategy
Conduct Exercises. Conduct exercises regularly to update employee
training.
VOLUNTEERS AS DISASTER SERVICE WORKERS
Under the Emergency Preparedness Plan volunteer groups play an impor-
tant role by providing specific services. The City is part of a countywide
volunteer services plan. The Emergency Services staff is working with the
Volunteer Center of Silicon Valley to develop a plan for coordinating and
deploying volunteers. Pre-disaster volunteers. such as CERT and CARES
members. have received appropriate training and equipment to rapidly
augment professional disaster workers. Unregistered and untrained volun-
teers may be assigned under the supervision of city staff as needed during
a disaster.
Policy 6-35: Responsibilities of Volunteer Groups
Clearly define responsibilities of volunteer groups during a local emer-
gency.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-33
Strategies
1.
Chamher of Commerce. Deyelop a Memorandlim af Understandffig
(MOV) with the Chamber of Comm€rce to pro'áde føod seJYiees daring a
disaster. Develop pre-disaster agreements with appropriate community
groups to rrovide specified post-disaster assistance, through the Emer-
gency Services Coordinator and with the advice of the City Attorney.
2.
Cupertino Community Ser\'Ìces. Denløp a Memorandam af DRàer
staRàirlg (MOV) VÆR CupeffiRe's Caæmtmity Services to coordiflate the
registration and use of regiGt-ered and spontaReouG, una#Hiated VOHm.
teem durffig a disaGter.
ð.
Local Schools. De\<elop a Memorandum of URderstaRàing (MOD) with
De :\nøa CeYege, ¥rement lJRien High Sekeel District and the Cupertino
UFrlHeà Sekael Diatriet regardffig Ðhclter øpem.äeRS.
2. Implement the American Red Cross agreements under the direction of
the Director of Emergencv Services (City Manager) during a disaster.
The American Red Cross is the Congressionally mandated mass care
and shelter provider in the United States. The Santa Clara Valley
Chapter of the American Red Cross has existing agreements with all
secondary school districts in the county for the use of their facilities as
mass care and shelter facilities during any locally declared disaster.
2-.3. Shelter Providers. Prepare an agreement with designated shelter sites
to provide space for emergency supply containers.
AMATEUR RADIO OPERATORS
Cupertino Amateur Radio Emergency Service (CARES) coordinates exten-
sive city-wide communications capability and connects neighbors, public safety,
special districts, City and County Departments. CARES is a volunteer organiza-
tion and space is provided for their operating equipment in the City EOC and
alternate EOC.
Policy 6-36: Amateur Radio Operators
Continue to support training and cooperation between the City and Cu-
pertino Amateur Radio Emergency Service (CARES) to prepare for emer-
gency communications needs.
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER
The Emergency Operations Center (EOC) is located on the lower floor of
City Hall. It is designed to be fully functional within 30 lIÚnutes of activation.
Capabilities include emergency backup power, computer network, internet ac-
cess and telephone and radio communications to City and County sites. Addi-
tional communication support is provided by volunteers from Cupertino
Amateur Radio Emergency Service (CARES). The alternate Emergency Opera-
tions Center is located at the Service Center on Mary Avenue.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFf GENERAL PLAN
~t
-(L ,~,
......df
6-34
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Policy 6-37: Emergency Operations Center
Train identified city employees on their functions/responsibilities in the
EOc.
COMMUNITY PREPAREDNESS
Keep the community well informed and prepared on how to cope with
catastrophic events.
Policy 6-38: Emergency Public Information
Develop and maintain. an Emergency Public Information program to be
used during emergency situations.
Strategies
2.
Communication Methods. Use the local TV charmel, the Internet and
other communication methods to transmit information to the citizenry.
Public Information Office. Activate the Public Information Office either
in the emergency Operations Center or in City Hall as quickly as possible.
1.
Policy 6-39: Community Preparedness
Pro'liàe tFaifling te the cammmlity eEl self preparedness far eHlergefleies.
Support the CERT program to ensure the development of neighborhood
based emergency preparedness throughout the City. Encourage coopera-
tion with CERTs in other cities.
ACCESSIBiliTY TO MEDICAL FACiliTIES
An earthquake of significant magnitude could temporarily isolate Cupertino
from major full-service hospitals (Figure 6-F). City personnel, paramedics and
local physicians will have to administer first aid until access to the major full-
service hospitals is reestablished.
Policy 6-4Q: Disaster Medical Response
Coordinate with local emergency clinics to provide disaster medical re-
sponse. Coordinate with the CERTs throughout the City to ensure that
they are prepared to provde medical care at the neighborhood level.
Strategy:
Memorandum of Understanding. Develop a Memorandum of Under-
standing with local emergency clines.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
r +:-:. ::J
\.""""'" ~.¡ori.,.s ¡
I c:=J ~;~i'" i
Figure 6-F. Areas Potentially Isolatable in a Seismic Emergency.
Flood Hazards
Floods are surface hydrological hazards that can have a significant, and
sometimes, long lasting effect on a community. They can cause substantial prop-
erty damage, and sometimes loss of life. Nationally, annual losses from floods
generally exceed losses from other natural disasters.
Floods can originate from various sources: heavy rainstorms, landslides
and/ or dam failure. Regardless of their source, their impacts on a community
can be devastating. Precautionary measures must be taken and preventive meas-
ures must be in place to prevent and/ or minimize potential damages related to
floods.
GoALK
PROTEC11ON FROM RISKS ASSOCIATED Wl11t FLOODS
Policy 6-41: Evacuation Map
Prepare and update periodically an evacuation map for the flood hazard
areas and distribute it to the general public.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
6-35
.~
......
6-36
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Policy 6-41A. Flood Insurance Map Rates
Ensure that FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps are developed for the City
of Cupertino.
Flood Hazards from Rainstonns
Rain related floods are seasonal. They are the most common type of floods,
and usually occur during those periods of extended heavy rainfall. One of the
contributory conditions to flooding in the urban environment is the reduced per-
colation potential of the land, caused by increased development and/ or paving.
During extended periods of heavy rainfall the open/undeveloped lands are in-
sufficient to absorb the rainfall and become saturated. Once the soils are satu-
rated rainfall will sheet flow toward the lower elevations, seeking available
outlets. If an adequate storm drainage system is not in place to dispose of the
surface runoff, the end result of the excessive runoff will be floods.
Flood Hazards From Landslides
Landslides can generate floods by creating water basins. In Cupertino a
landslide could occur within a steep ravine at the fringes of the foothills in the
more mountainous terrain of the Urban Service Area boundary. In the event such
a landslide were to occur in a ravine serving a relatively large watershed, the
natural flow of water would be blocked off and water would collect behind the
blockage created by the landslide. If appropriate spillways are not provided to
relieve the pressure being exerted on the blockage, it could collapse, causing
large volumes of water to precipitate down the ravine, causing injuries to people
and/or damaging property. Landslides can also create floods by falling into a
dam and/ or reservoir displacing large volumes of water and spilling into the
adjacent areas. Such landslides can also create seiches (the sloshing action within
an enclosed or semi-enclosed body of water), which in turn can create large
waves topping the levees and flooding downstream, causing property damage
and injury to developments and residents downstream. Fortunately, the water-
sheds in this area are relatively small, so the risk of floods caused by landslides is
minimal.
Flood Hazards From Dam Failure
Flooding resulting from dam failure is yet another hydrological hazard.
Causes for dam failure are numerous. They include inadequate design, construc-
tion deficiencies, and sometimes poor bearing soils. Dam failure resulting from
seismic events are rare.
Policy 6-42: Emergem;y Response to Dam Failure
Ensure that Cupertino is prepared to respond to a potential dam failure.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-37
Strategy:
StrateI?;V 1. Emergency and Evacuation Plan. Maintain a dam emergency
and evacuation plan.
Strateg;v 2. Emergencv Response to Dam Failure. Coordinate dam-
related evacuation plans with the City of Sunnyvale to ensure that traffic
management between the two cities facilitates life safety.
Multiple Occurrences
Floods whether related to rainstorms, landslides or dam failure are inde-
pendent events, but could also occur simultaneously. For example, a landslide
could occur during a flood caused by a heavy rainstorm as a result of the land
becoming saturated, possibly weakening the structural integrity of the hillsides
or causing displacement of a large amount of stored water. And while the com-
bination of rainstorm related flood and a landslide is not totally improbable, the
likelihood of a seismic event that could rupture a dam also occurring at the same
time is remote.
Infrastructure
With the exception of some the older areas of the planning area, such as
Monta Vista, the City is served by a storm drainage system to accommodate a 10-
year flood, and the City now requires that all new development adhere to this
standard. In addition, the City proposes to upgrade the key parts of the older
system through a long-term capital improvement program, including a project to
specifically provide a storm drain system for the Monta Vista area.
The City has not studied in detail the carrying capacity of the existing sys-
tem, but it is estimated that it could accommodate the runoff from a 10-year to a
40-year flood, although there would be some overflow that would run along the
street gutters but ultimately dissipate into the major storm channels and creeks
able to accommodate a 100-year storm. Heavier storms may cause some flooding
of yards, but flooding of buildings would be extremely unlikely. As previously
mentioned, there are a few areas of the City, such as Old Monta Vista and older
areas next to the foothills, that are not protected by a storm drainage system.
These areas would be subjected to flooding, but it is difficult, if not impossible, to
predict the location and extent of the effect of the flooding in these smaller iso-
lated areas. The extent of property damage caused by flooding in these areas
would be commensurate to the intensity of the flooding, but the risk of loss of life
is virtually non-existent.
Sediment deposits increase flood risks because they clog the drainage sys-
tem as well as the natural percolation function of the streambeds, which replen-
ish the underground water table. Sediment is caused by natural erosion as well
as erosion induced by development, mostly in the hillsides. Removing sediment
from the drain lines is a major expense to the City. Preventive measures, such as
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
~\\
-:>Y\\'t..,
I,',," if""."
'~~.:..: '
6-38
HEALTH AND SAFETY
the City's Residential Hillside Ordinance require private hillside construction to
install erosion control measures on all cut-and-fill slopes, including roadways,
driveways, and house pads, help to minimize the problem.
Most water-storage facilities shown in Figure 6-G are designed to with-
stand ground shaking. If the magnitude of ground shaking was not previously
assessed or if the water facilities were designed before nèw standards were de-
veloped, their structural integrity should be assessed. The City owns three tanks,
but they are being leased to the San Jose Water Company. The San Jose Water
Company is responsible for the maintenance and safety of the tanks. The City
should work closely with the owners of other tanks and the San Jose Water
Company to ensure that the structural integrity of all the tanks is maintained in
accordance with the latest seismic engineering standards and that an evaluation
of the possible areas of flooding be conducted.
Acceptable Level of Risk
An acceptable level of risk is the chance one is willing to accept weighed
against the probability of the occurrence of an event that may cause property loss
or injury. It is a conscious decision that takes into account the cost/benefit ratio
of risk reduction. Risk reduction is proportionally related to cost, the lower the
risk, the greater the cost.
Flood risks within Cupertino and its planning area are relatively low. There
are a number of water storage tanks existing in the hillside areas (see Figure 6-G)
that have the potential to inflict property losses and injuries to residents of
homes existing in their proximity in the event of failure. However, the probabil-
ity of their failure is considered to be very low; consequently, they are considered
to be a minimal risk. The largest body of water within the area is the Stevens
Creek Reservoir, and the probability of its failure is minimal. Figure 6-G depicts
the extent of the inundation potential resulting from the failure of made-made
water storage facilities.
Flood Plain
Stevens Creek and its streamside are among the natural elements that have
the most influence on Cupertino's character. The creek strongly defines the
boundary between the urban and rural parts of the City, extends a note of un-
spoiled beauty into the heart of the developed valley floor and gives many resi-
dents and visitors a space for play, relaxation or study of the creek's plant and
animal life. Other creeks traversing the City are Permanente Creek, Regnart
Creek and Calabazas Creek. These creeks collect surface runoff and channel it to
the Bay. However, they also pose potential flooding risks should their levees be
topped as a result of heavy runoff.
Land uses in the flood plain should allow the public access to the creek, but
materials that would restrict the free flow of the creek waters or significantly dis-
turb the riparian environment should be prohibited.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-39
The Santa Clara Valley Water District and the City of Cupertino are actively
involved in programs to minin:ùze the risk of flooding. The City developed a
flood plain land use policy for the non-urbanized flood plain of Stevens Creek
south of Stevens Creek Boulevard. This ensures the preservation of the lOO-year
flood plain and the protection of the riparian corridor along this portion of Ste-
vens Creek.
The City and the Water District developed a flood management program for
the flood plain of Stevens Creek between Interstate 280 and Stevens Creek
Boulevard. The strategy is to keep the natural environment of Stevens Creek, al-
though structural improvement may be necessary to protect properties from a
lOO-year flood. The majority of the people living in the Phar Lap Drive and Cres-
ton neighborhoods have a high flood risk, but they are partially covered by the
Federal Flood Insurance Program.
The Santa Clara Water District has now completed the construction of the
Calabazas Creek Project, which included the construction of a conduit across In-
terstate 280 to reduce the barrier effect created by the freeway itself that was built
across the natural flood plain. The scope of the project also included improve-
ments that should also minin:ùze the flooding problems in the Miller Avenue
area.
The watersheds in the Santa Cruz Mountain Range feed into four major
streambeds that cross the City: Permanente Creek, Stevens Creek, Regnart Creek,
Calabazas Creek. Figure 6-H shows the streambed locations and the extent of a
lOO-year flood, which has a one percent chance of occurring during any given
year. The 100-year flood is the standard design flood accepted by the City, the
Santa Clara Valley Water District and federal agencies.
Policy 6-43: Existing Uses in the Flood Plain
Allow commercial and recreational uses that are now exclusively within
the flood plain to remain in their present use or to be use for agriculture.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
~
-j/t~ '~
(~ ~v .>'l
._-~
6-40
HEALTH AND SAFETY
(insert Figure 6-G Extent of Flooding as a Result of Failure of Man-Made
Water Storage Facilities here)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-41
(insert Figure 6-H Extent of Floocling as a result of a "lOa-Year' Flood here)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFI' GENERAL PLAN
-~t..'...
(t ¿',
,~
6-42
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Policy 6-44: New Construction in Flood Plains
Adopt stringent land use, zoning and building code regulations limiting
new construction in the already urbanized flood hazard areas recognized
by the Federal Flood Insurance Administrator.
Strategies:
1.
Finish Floor level. Install the first floor finish level of all habitable space
of new construction above the inundation level of a projected lOa-year
flood.
2.
Description of Flood Zone Regulation. Publish a description of flood
zone regulations and a map of potential flood hazard areas in the Cuper-
tino Scene.
Policy 6-45 Dwellings in Natural Flood Plain
Regulate closely all types of habitable development in natural flood plains.
This includes prohibiting fill materials and obstructions that may increase
flood potential downstream or modify the natural riparian corridors.
Policy 6-46: Hillside Grading
Restrict the extent and timing of hillside grading operation to April through
October. Require performance bonds during the remaining time to guaran-
tee the repair of any erosion damage. All graded slopes must be planted as
soon as practical after grading is complete.
Policy 6-47: Stability of Existing Water Storage Facilities
Assure the structural integrity of water storage facilities.
Straœgy
Coordination with other Agencies. Work closely with the San Jose Water
Company and owners of other water storage facilities to develop and im-
plement a program to monitor the stability of all existing water storage
facilities and related improvements, such as: distribution lines, connec-
tions and other system-components.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTII AND SAFETY
6-43
NOISE POLLUTION
Freedom from excessive noise is a major contributor to a high quality of life.
This section gives a policy framework for guiillng future land use and urban de-
sign decisions and contains a system of control and abatement measures to pro-
tect residents from exposure to excessive or unacceptable noise levels.
The noise environment is an accumulation of many different sources, rang-
ing from common machinery to the major source, street and freeway traffic. The
degree to which noise is irritating depends on a variety of factors, some inde-
pendent of the noise source itself. Time of day, background sound level, the lis-
tener's activity and surrounillng land use can all influence the degree to which a
particular sound is perceived as annoying. Value judgments also enter into toler-
ance for urban sound levels. Most people tolerate emergency sirens and loud
lawnmowers because they represent necessary actions, public safety and
neighborhood upkeep. However, loud noises from cars with defective or modi-
fied mufflers are usually perceived as annoyances.
Overall noise levels seem to be increasing despite efforts to identify and
regulate noise sources. An increasing population density affects traffic on exist-
ing roads and construction of new roads, e.g., 1-85, which opened since the past
General Plan was prepared in 1993, raised overall noise levels. It is not possible
to control all noise sources within Cupertino, but some regulation is needed to
offset negative results of excessive noise.
Community Noise Fundamentals
A more comprehensive discussion of community noise is provided in the
technical appendix. This discussion addresses only the basic nomenclature and
concepts necessary to understand the technical portions of this noise element.
Noise is unwanted sound, and is therefore a subjective phenomenon that
depends upon the listener's attitude toward the sound. The three elements of
community noise are noise level, noise spectrum and variation in noise level with
time. Noise level is measured in decibels (dB). Every noise is composed of vari-
ous frequencies that define the character of the noise. Since human hearing is
more sensitive to the higher speech frequencies, the A-weighted frequency net-
work is applied, according to national and international standards, to adjust the
measured noise level to more closely relate to human perception of loudness.
Effective land use planning requires a means to assess various time-varying
noise environments for their suitability for various land uses (e.g., housing,
commercial, retail, industrial). Different noise environments have different time-
varying characteristics; for instance a freeway may emit a fairly constant noise
level for long periods while an airport may emit many short-term high level
noise events punctuated by extended periods of quiet. To provide a standard
measure for community noise exposure the State of Califomia has adopted the
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
c~
í<lL\'L. 'l¿""
"--ít/I;
6-44
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) as the standard metric
(21CAC5000), and is used in this noise element. The CNEL metric is a 24-hour
energy average measure that penalizes evening and nighttime noise, and
provides a uniform measure for various time-varying noise environments in a
way that generally relates to community annoyance over noise.
......_áIiwt Sounds ... Sound .....
ean.o-iIr ....... .... n...........
(OoooIdoÞaIt ~
___".uoic'(1IO1J))
- .--. --
} .-.... <If....
"'- moc."
__«'GO))
~'\2i»
-150»
"""""-"-,.....
Iloilo! .....
F_~Ion,,",
_....~\DO)
~...c_-tlorr¡
-_co""",-
_c,"",,",'(3~
08~"-
~-I(2GII',)
Qoon .... Ousl.... ....
-
--
QuiII-"-
-f(S\)
- ... .--.
~ -- - .....
..--
Figure 6-1. Typical Sound Levels Measured in the Community, Industry, and
Home.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-45
Noise Contours
Noise contour maps are created for land use planning purposes. The con-
tour maps give a visual representation of the noise environment in Cupertino.
The noise contours are conservative, meaning that the contours are modeled with
minimal noise attenuation by natural barriers, buildings, etc. The noise level
measured at a specific location may be lower than what is shown on the noise
contour map. The purpose of noise element contours is to identify a need for ad-
ditional acoustical investigations.
Two sets of CNEL noise contours were created: present day conditions
(Year 2000) and future conditions (Year 2020). The future conditions were based
upon projected housing unit growth of 23% (4,761 units) and projected job
growth of 13% (5,792 jobs).
The following figures, 6-} and 6-K, represent Existing Year 2000 and Future
Year 2020 noise contour maps, respectively. These contours indicate only a slight
increase in noise levels.
Noise Monitoring
In order to characterize the noise environment in Cupertino, existing noise
conditions in Cupertino were measured at six locations for a period of twenty-
four hours. The following Table, 6-E, summarizes each measurement's location
and corresponding CNEL value.
Table 6-£: Noise Monitoring Summary.
Location
CNEL Value
Stevens Creek Blvd at Valko Financial Ctr.
Stevens Creek Blvd. East of De Anza Blvd.
69 dB
72 dB
South Stelling at Tomki Ct.
Stelling North of 1-280
73 dB
72 dB
Foothi11 Blvd. at Silver Oak Wy.
Bollinger Rd. West of Miller Ave.
76 dB
73 dB
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
-~
....~~
1!111!111!11![
6-46
HEALTH AND SAFETY
(insert Figure 6-J. 2000 Noise Contours here)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-47
(insert Figure 6-K. 2020 Noise Contours here)
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
-~
.....~.
6-48
HEALTH AND SAFETY
land Use Compatibility
Many undesirable noise effects can be reduced or avoided if noise condi-
tions are considered when assigning uses to specific land parcels. Noise cannot
and should not be the primary factor considered in land use analysis, but the
City should strive to match land uses to compatible noise levels.
Compatibility may be achieved by locating land use types outside of desig-
nated noise impact areas or by requiring modifications including setbacks, sound
walls, building insulation or landscaping.
The Cupertino Municipal Code, Section 10, outlines the maximum noise
levels on receiving properties based upon land use types.
GOAL l
A COMPATIBLE NOISE ENVIRONMENT FOR EXISTING AND FUnlRE
LAND USES
Policy 6-48: Land Use Decision Evaluation
Use the Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments
chart and the City Municipal Code to evaluate land use decisions.
Strategy
1.
Noise Review of New Development. Review the proximity of new or
significantly remodeled housing to the traffic noise corridor by using the
noise contour map and review the results of previous noise standards to
see if the standards can be complied with through conventional construc-
tion practices. If there is not enough information, the staff may ask the
developer to provide an acoustical analysis along with the application.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
úofI "" '""'""
__-low'"
..... fooiIr. .......
--
--
-- foIIIr
- ....... -
--
-.~.
-. ....-.
--
-... -.
-.....-
......-.-
...... ......
.........
.......... -
III -- ...
--
--
--.--
-...
-
-.--"
- ........
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-49
ó!i
iII.-IIIiIr-~
"-C8Il,"
8! i!ii IØ 1>
_.
.
c::::J
...............
~!11111"""__,_,
-""",..."""",1)11Drrtt..".~.
....... _"'..ad"""""
-""',,,".-.'-
""_"""""""'""'"
....,.,.,,_.
.,,1;1,;;;,,",1
--
...,.._"",,-
-"_ø~;_æ
--...:t"",."""""""""
-_..""""""-
_,,__i_iw
...~---..
~..,."',_..,"""',,""'_..,
--"""""""""nw
ilif_V!!'"
-
---
-"..,-...-
_~"'~_Ift
... -..,--
-...--:1"""
--..."""".,-
..... ...-""",...,"'...
_'"","",,'0."""""'"
-
----
...'-""-
--.....""",-..
Source: State of California's General Plan Guidelines, 1998.
Figure 6-L: Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments.
Transportation Noise
Traffic noise is the greatest contributor to noise pollution in Cupertino and
one of the most difficult to control through local effort. Two major freeways and
three major arterial streets cross Cupertino.
Cupertino is fortunate that significant portions of Highways 85 and 280 are
recessed, because this helps lessen noise in the surrounding neighborhoods.
Freeway noise, at a constant but subdued level, is less of a direct threat to
neighbors. Commuters use De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard
heavily and greatly increase local traffic congestion, air pollution and noise.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
-~
..~
6-50
HEALTH AND SAFETY
When the Municipal Code allowing maximum noise levels are compared to
the existing noise levels (Figure 6-J -Existing (Year 2000) Noise Contours), the
majority of locations are currently experiencing noise levels above the maximum
allowable.
New development in these areas will be required to build and incorporate
design strategies outlined in the policies of this document to meet the maximum
allowed internal and external noise levels.
GOAL M
REDUCED NOISE IMPACT OF MAJOR STREETS AND FREEWAYS ON
CUPERnNO RESIDENTS
Policy 6-49: Freeway Design and Neighborhood Noise
Ensure that roads and development along 1-85 and 1-280 are designed and
improved in a way that minimizes neighborhood noise.
Policy 6-50: Stricter State Noise Laws
Support enactment of stricter state laws on noise emissions from new mo-
tor vehicles and enforce existing street laws on noise emissions.
Policy 6-51: Neighborhood Need Priority
Review the needs of residents for convenience and safety and make them
a priority over the convenient movement of commute or through traffic
where practical.
Policy 6-52: Traffk Calming Solutions to Street Noise
Evaluate solutions to discourage through traffic in neighborhoods
through modified street design. Examples include meandering streets,
diverters, landscape islands and wide parking strips.
Strategy
Local Improvement. Modify street design to minimize noise impact to
neighbors.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-51
Train and Aircraft Noise
Trains and aircraft do not conhibute much to noise in Cupertino. Aircraft
flying into Moffett Field Naval Air Station are restricted to the northeastern cor-
ner of Cupertino, affecting some residents of the Rancho Rinconada neighbor-
hood. Cupertino's one railroad line passes through the Monta Vista
neighborhood and connects with the Hanson Perrnanente Plant in the Western
foothills. There is one train three times a week (2 trips - one in, one out), which
occurs usually in the afternoon or early evening hours. Noise levels associated
with the trains are approximately 85-90 decibels at a distance of 50 ft. from the
track for a period of two minutes. There are no noise protection devices along the
rail corridor, and if increases in rail activity occur, other mitigation may be re-
quired.
Truck Traffic
The most crucial example of traffic noise intrusion on the quality of
neighborhood life is the effect of heavy-duty truck hips to and from the Hanson
Permanente Cement Plant and Stevens Creek Quarry located in the western
foothills near Stevens Creek Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard. There are about
1,400 hips each working day, which generate noise levels up to 90 dB next to the
road. When trucks speed up, slow down or use their high-powered brakes on the
unusually steep road, the truck noise problem is worsened.
Policy 6-53; Noise Improvement by Restricting Trucks
Work toward improving the noise environment along Foothill Boulevard
and Stevens Creek Boulevard by reshicting quarry truck traffic especially
during late evening and early morning hours. It is preferable that the re-
shictions be voluntary. Encourage alternative to truck transport, specifi-
cally rail, when feasible.
~
A study prepared by
professional acoustical
engineering consultants sug-
gested a series of measures to
diminish noise for homes along
the truck traffic corridor.
Reducing truck travel and
carrying out these measures
could give some relief to the
residents most severely affected.
(Photo caption here)
-ITt\.
_._~
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
6-52
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-54
HEALTH AND SAFETY
line of the nearest road, placement and height of the sound wall in relation to the
receptor line, the size and location of the area to be protected and the frequency
of the noise source. The barrier is more successful with higher-pitched noise and
is usually more effective when located close to the source or to the listener, as-
suming that both are below the top of the barrier.
Sound walls can be unattractive and can enclose or separate neighborhoods.
Landscaping is a less expensive and effective way to make the walls more attrac-
tive and will also reduce sound reflection from the walls. Evergreen and vines
should be planted along the roadway side. Reflection can increase noise levels on
the opposite side by as much as 5 dB.
Policy 6-61: Sound Wall Requirements
Exercise discretion in requiring sound walls to be sure that all other
measures of noise control have been explored and that the sound wall
blends with the neighborhood. Sound walls should be landscaped.
Landscaping And Setbacks
Landscaping and setbacks for small properties do not work well in reducing
noise. Plants and trees are not dense enough to prevent airflow. Setbacks must be
substantial to make a difference in noise. Noise attenuates about 3 dB for heavy
traffic and about 6 dB for light traffic every time the setback from the centerline
of the roadway is doubled.
Building and Site Design
Building and site design techniques can control noise effectively in new de-
velopments or when existing buildings are modified. Sensitive areas can be set
back or buffered by buildings, parking or recreation areas. Homes can use rooms
such as kitchens, bathrooms and garages to buffer the more sensitive bedrooms
and living rooms. Buildings should face solid walls onto the noise source and be
sure that no vents or other air leaks face the noise source.
INSULATING BUILDINGS FROM NOISE
Conventional building practices typically achieve exterior-to-interior noise
reductions from adjoining roadways of about 10 dB with open windows and 20
dB with closed windows. Considerably higher noise reduction is possible with
specialized acoustical design and construction.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
HEALTH AND SAFETY
6-55
Table 6-F shows noise reduction from typical building types
Table 6-F. Approximate Exterior-to-Interior Noise Reduction Achieved by Stnu:-
tures.
Bldg. Type Window Condition Exterior-ta-Interior Maximum Exterior
Noise Reduction CNEL Value
for 45 dB Intm""
CNEL Value
All Open 10 dB 55 dB
Light Frame Ordinary sash, closed 20 dB 65 dB
Masonry Single pane, closed 25 dB 70 dB
Masonry Sound-rated windows, closed 35 dB 80 dB
GOAL 0
BUILDINGS DESIGNED TO DIMINISH NOISE
Policy 6-62: Building Code Sections on Exterior Noise Intrusion
Require the City Building Department to enforce all sections of the Cali-
fomia Building Code for exterior sound transmission control (Sec.
1208A.8.1). Specifically, require for all proposed multi-family residential
sites to determine if the exterior CNEL noise environment exceeds 60 dB;
if so, require as a building permit requirement that the design ensure a
maximum interior noise environment of 45 dB. This must be accom-
plished while also complying with the ventilation requirements of the
Building Code, thereby requiring addition of a mechanical ventilation
system for some projects. Require as a condition of an occupancy permit
that the construction be tested to demonstrate compliance with the exte-
rior noise requirement.
Policy 6-63: Building Code Sections on Interior Noise
Encourage the City Building Department to enforce all sections of the
Califomia Building Code relating to interdwe1ling sound transmission
control (Sec. 1208A.1.6). Specifically, require as a building permit re-
quirement that all proposed multi-family residential projects are designed
to ensure that wall and floor-ceiling assemblies comply with the airborne
sound insulation and impact sound insulation requirements of the Code.
Require as a condition of an occupancy permit that the construction be
tested to demonstrate compliance with the Code requirements.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
..'~"~"\""
-j'h'\:; "'-,
(iL' ",')
'.,..
6-56
HEALTH AND SAFETY
Policy 6-64: Application of Policy 6-61 to New Single-family Hol1U!s
Consider applying the California Building Code requirements for exterior
sound transmission control (Sec. 1208A.8.1) to construction of new single-
family housing.
CITY OF CUPERTINO DRAFT GENERAL PLAN
Cupertino General Plan Task Force Minority Report:
Mixed Use Development, Building Density, and Below-Market-RateHousing
November 3, 2003
We, the undersigned, community members who reside and do business in Cupertino, respectfully
disagree with the changes recommended by the Cupertino General Plan Task Force on the topics
of mixed-use development, building height, building form, building density, and below-market-
rate housing. We recommend that the council approve the draft plan on these topics as provided
in the original January 2003 Draft General Plan, as discussed below:
I. The most successful, livable, desirable, and highly valued communities support the needs
of residents of varying ages, family status, and independence. As modified by the task
force, the plan insufficiently meets the variety of needs of the oldest and youngest
members of our community. Single people or couples who seek smaller residences and
people who may not be able or desire to drive are not served by the proposed excessive
restrictions on building use, height, form, and density.
2. The most successful, livable, desirable, and highly valued communities consider
community design as a whole by integrating building use, height, form, and density into a
coherent form on a neighborhood basis to ensure a functional, aesthetically pleasing, and
comprehensive design. Although a few changes to the City Center design specifications
are considered appropriate by some of us, we firmly believe that the plan, as modified by
the task force, overly restricts these details across the city as a whole and thus prevents
beneficial changes to our business districts and neighborhoods.
3. The most successful, livable, desirable, and highly valued communities harness the profit
motive to spur their businesspeople to remedy blighted areas, improve housing and
business opportunities, and increase the strength and value of their cities as a whole. As
modified by the task force, the plan is overly restrictive and discourages investment in
our city, ensuring that our blighted areas remain underutilized and that businesses will
fail to make the investments to maintain and grow our business and retail activity.
Potential tax revenue will be lost as small businesses struggle to reach their profit
potential and larger businesses turn to other communities to meet their needs.
4. The most balanced and sustainable communities ensure that all members of the
community who contribute or have contributed to its success; such as teachers, police
officers, firefighters, small business owners, government and non-profit employees, other
workers, and seniors on fixed incomes; have places to live within the city. As modified
by the task force, the plan increases the number of below- market-rate units required as
part of each housing development (a change with which we agree). However, instead of
promoting and providing incentives for the production of below- market-rate housing, the
plan reduces the likelihood that such housing will be built by placing undue restrictions
on the most likely areas where such housing might be built and by maintaining current
restrictions in place today.
Page I of3
5. The most balanced and sustainable communities acknowledge that they do not exist in
isolation, but instead in the midst of other cities, and that each city must do its part to
ensure a successful region by providing sufficient below-market-rate housing and
considering its impacts on regional traffic. As modified by the task force, the plan
prevents our city from doing its part by reducing the likelihood that below-market-rate
housing will be built, thereby worsening regional and local traffic problems by ensuring
that workers must continue to commute to local jobs from distant areas.
6. Our residents have spoken clearly and repeatedly about their desire for a dynamic,
community-creating, business-friendly, pedestrian-friendly downtown where residents
can gather, shop, eat, recreate, and relax. However, as modified by the task force, the
plan ignores this desire by eliminating changes in building use, height, form, and density
necessary for such a downtown in the areas where such a downtown could eventually be
grown.
7. A strong, successful business and retail community and strong, successful, desirable
residential community are not mutually exclusive; on the contrary, mixed-use
business/retail and residential communities are often highly sought after by both
businesses and residents. Such mixed-use developments can also make existing single-
use areas work better by creating buffers and areas oftransition between commercial
areas and single-family residences. However, as modified by the task force, such
desirable mixed-use is precluded in the areas that are most suitable within our city.
8. The January 2003 Draft General Plan as originally proposed provides the flexibility
necessary to maintain and improve our city's economic and social health through our
current economic slowdown and into future economic growth periods. However, as
modified by the task force, the plan eliminates the flexibility that our public servants need
to react appropriately to these changes and the ever-changing marketplace.
No document can completely cover in detail every eventuality that may arise over the next ten
years, five years, or even one year. A capable staff, planning commission, and publicly-elected
city council are crucial to a successful future as our city inevitably changes economically,
demographically, and socially. Part of our responsibility as citizens is to vote for those who will
carry out this trust in spirit and in deed. Efforts made by the general plan task force to prevent
errors of commission by these groups may result in greater errors by precluding economic
growth and other desired improvements to our city. Therefore, we, the undersigned, disagree
with the changes recommended by the Cupertino General Plan Task Force on the topics of
mixed-use development, building height, building form, building density, and below-market-rate
housing, and we recommend that the city council approve the original January 2003 Draft
General Plan recommendations on the topics outlined in this minority report.
Page 2 of3
[Signed]
Rodney Brown
Lisa Giefer
David Greenstein
Roberta Hollimon
Shawna Holmes
Olivia Jang
Nicôl Lea
Todd B. Lee
Brian P. Low
Jonathan Moss
John Noone
Peter Pau
Kathy Robinson
Frank Yap
Page 3 of3
General Plan Task Force
July - October 2003
Task Force Members
1/12/2004
First Last 7/9 7/16 7/23 8/6 8/13 8/20 8/27 9/10 9/17 9/24 10/8 10/15
Fari Aberg
Charlie Ahern " " " " " " "
Stan Barkey " " " -" "
Cynthia A. Bartlett Wong
Girish Bhat " " " "
Dave Blau " " " "
Rodney E Brown
Mark Burns " "
Pat Bustamante "
James Cai " " ,, "
Nolan Chen "
Cary Chien " w "
Matthew Cohn -..- " "
Erve Conens "
Roger Costa
NinaK. Daruwalla " "
Michael DiTore " " "
Linda Espinoza " "
Suzanne Ford " " w "
Mike Foulkes w " w " "- ,,
Lisa A. Giefer
Andrew Golkar " " " w "
Bob Graber " w
David Greenstein "
Mary Jo Gunderson " ,, -"- "
Andrea Harris
Robert Hendrickson "
Mary Holaday "
Roberta Hollimon " " "
First Last 7/9 7/16 7/23 8/6 8/13 8/20 8/27 9/10 9/17 9/24 10/8 10/15
* Absent
Task Force Members
1/12/2004
Shawna Holmes K K K
George Hsing K K
Raymond Hsu
Michelle Hu w w
Olivia Jang w
Beez Jones w w
Zack KoJev K K K W w
John E. Kolski K K K K K K K K
Sally Larson
Nicol Lea w w w
Todd Lee w w
Robert Levy w
Brian Low K
Jon Moss K K w
Shishir Mukherjee K K
Maika Nagel K
Mahesh Nihalani
John Noone
Peter Pau w w w w w w w
Zahra Pavlovic K w
Betsy Randolph K w w
Kathy Robinson K
Douglas Rowe K K
Joe Sluga K K K
Maty Soha
Kathy Stakey
Homer Tong w
Joanne Tong w w w
Joseph Walton K K
Kris Wang K K W
Dennis Whittaker
First Last 7/9 7/16 7/23 8/6 8/13 8/20 8/27 9/10 9/17 9/24 10/8 10/15
. Absent
Winslow
Yamani
Yap
I
Task Force Members
1/12/2004
63 Task Force Members
60
59
50
49
28
48
49
47
45
44
55
52
Task Force members who resigned:
Cindy
Dan
Danh
Harvey
Jan
Kathleen
Mike
Robert
Trudi
. Absent
McArthur
Schofield
Trang
Barnett
Black
Crawford
Glazebrook
McLoskey
Wallick-Harrocks
Summary of the Cupertino General Plan Task Force meetings
July 9, 2003
Speakers and Presentations by:
Steve Piasecki: overview of the Task Force activities dates and spoke on
Community Form.
Ciddy Wordell: background on the main General Plan topics
Bob Harrison, Planning Resource Associates: traffic and transportation.
Jessica Fitchen, Greenbelt Alliance: in land use planning.
Randol Mackley, Real Estate Group: on the commercial market.
Discussion:
The Task Force met in table groups to select interim table leaders and to prepare
questions regarding the information presented by the speakers.
July 16,2003
Speakers and Presentations by:
Lydia Tan, Bridge Housing: on affordable housing
Rick Hausman, Cupertino Union School District
Gene Longinetti, Fremont Union High School District
Carol Atwood, Director of Administrative Services, City of Cupertino: on fiscal
issues.
Ciddy Wordell, Vera Gil and Steve Piasecki on General Plan topics
Discussion:
The Task Force met in table groups to prepare questions regarding the
information presented by the speakers.
July 23, 2003
Discussion:
Task Force members met in table to groups to select permanent Table Leaders
and Alternates, set Table Group protocol and discussed the Task Force process
issues and Community Form and Housing issues.
August 6, 2003
Speakers and Presentations by:
Ken Waldvogel, Santa Clara County Fire District: on fire services
Ciddy Wordell and Steve Piasecki on "taking stock" of the where the Task Force
was in the process.
Discussion:
The Task Force met in table groups to discuss Task Force process issues and
Community Form and Housing issues.
August 13, 2003
Speakers and Presentations by:
Captain John Hirokawa, Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department: on how the
sheriff's department serves Cupertino, and provided background information on
crime rates and issues.
Glenn Goepfert, Assistant Public Works Director, City of Cupertino: on
circulation issues.
Discussion:
The Task Force met in table groups to discuss Task Force process issues and the
circulation discussion points.
August 20, 2003
Speakers and Presentations by:
Therese Smith, Director of Parks and Recreation, City of Cupertino, presented
background on open space, parks and trails.
Discussion:
The Task Force met in table groups to discuss Task Force process issues and the
Open Space, Parks and Trails discussion points.
August 27, 2003
Discussion:
The Task Force met in table groups to discuss Task Force process issues and
Environmental Resources/Sustainability, Health and Safety and Circulation.
August 30, 2003
Field Trip:
The first of two field trips took place. Task Force members accompanied staff on
a field trip of development in surrounding communities.
September 6, 2003
Field Trip:
The second of two field trips took place. Task Force members accompanied staff
on a field trip of development in surrounding communities.
September10,2003
Discussion:
The Task Force met in table groups to discuss Task Force process issues and
Community Form/Housing (Land Use/Community Character and Housing
Elements).
September 17, 2003
Speakers and Presentations:
Recommendations for changes to the Environmental Resources and Health and
Safety elements were presented by the drafters of the recommendations.
Discussion:
. The Task Force met in table groups to discuss Task Force process issues and the
Community Form/Housing, Environmental Resources and Health and Safety
discussion points.
September 24, 2003
Speakers and Presentations:
Task Force members who drafted the Community Form and Housing and the
Transportation (Share the Road) recommendations presented their
recommendations to the Task Force.
Discussion:
The Task Force met in table groups to discuss Task Force process issues and the
Community Form/Housing and Transportation recommendations.
October 8, 2003
Discussion:
Lou Hexter, Moore Iacofano and Goltsman (MIG) facilitated the meeting. The
Task Force discussed and approved the Community Form and Housing final
draft.
October 15, 2003
The Task Force discussed and approved the Circulation, Environmental
Resources and Health and Safety final draft.
December 10, 2003
The Task Force reviewed the Task Force Draft General Plan and requested that
they have until January 15, 2004 to confirm that this draft reflects their
recommendations.
G: \ Planning \ GenPlan \ Task Force \ Summary of the Task Force meetings.doc
LAND USE ELEMENT
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-1: Diversity of Land Use
Provide adequate land area for employment, Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
housing, shopping, entertainment, cultural activities, (Policy 2-20) Draft.
health care, personal services, recreation and open
space. Encourage mixed-use development of
commercial/ office and housing.
Policy 2-2: Heart of the City
Coordinate the efforts of private property owners on Modify. Modify Administrative
or near Stevens Creek Boulevard to plan and create a Heart of the City will be a Draft. No references to
community focal point that expresses the character Special Planning Area with buildings close to street,
of Cupertino through a diversity of uses, serving sub-areas (Crossroads, traffic calming or mixed
City residents and scaled for pedestrians. Stevens Creek Blvd.) use.
(Policies 2-27, 28, 29)
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-3: Development Reallocation
Development activity should be controlled so that Modify. Modify Administrative
the City street system is not overwhelmed with A new development Draft. Decrease residential
traffic and the desired transportation level of service allocation system is units and hotel rooms,
is maintained. To meet the City's goals and proposed. Transportation increase commercial. No
priorities, the remaining uncommitted development level of service will not be Task Force consensus on
potential that achieves the City's transportation the driving force; LOS goals allocation numbers, so two
goals should be reallocated as shown below. Further will be balanced with other options are offered.
adjustments to these allocations may be necessary to City goals. (Policy 2-19)
ensure that the City's transportation goals are met.
Policy 2-4: Land Use Intensity Regulation by FAR (Policies 2-4 to 2-12 relate
to Monta Vista)
Regulate land use intensity for properties described Modify. Monta Vista is Modify Administrative
in Figure 2-C by a .33 Floor Area Ratio for industrial allocated a base FAR of .15 Draft. Change to .25.
and office activities. Development intensity for other for non-residential uses.
non-residential use areas requires a development (Policy 2-24)
allocation.
Policy 2-5: Commercial Blight and Noise Intrusion
Work to ensure that blight and noise from Modify. The idea is Same as Administrative
commercial and industrial uses do not intrude upon retained and reworded in a Draft.
residential neighborhoods. different policy. (Policy 2-6)
2
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-6: Interconnected Access, Shared Parking
of Individual Properties
Ensure that individual properties developed Keep. Same as Administrative
independently of surrounding sites have Draft.
interconnected pedestrian and vehicle access and
shared parking.
Policy 2-7: Housing Units Removed Under
Eminent Domain
Require that housing units removed under Delete. Same as Administrative
eminent domain proceedings be replaced on a UIÙikely that housing units Draft.
one-for-one basis within the same geographical would be removed by
area and that the people who were displaced eminent domain.
can afford the units.
Policy 2-8: Architectural Barriers
Eliminate architectural barriers to pedestrian Delete. Same as Administrative
mobility. Not unique to Monta Vista. Draft.
Policy 2-9: Residential Street Improvements
Maintain a semi-rural appearance with residential Keep. Same as Administrative
street improvements. Is consistent with the Monta Draft.
Vista Design Guidelines.
3
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-10: Neighborhood Landscaping
Preserve existing neighborhood landscaping features Delete. Same as Administrative
during redevelopment. Emphasize on-site parking Draft.
instead of street frontage parking.
Policy 2-11: Mixed-Use Development
Allow mixed-use development within the area Keep. Same as Administrative
bounded by Granada Avenue, Stevens Creek Blvd., Draft.
Orange Avenue and the SP right of way to rely on
public parking on Pasadena and Imperial avenues to
meet the off-street parking needs for the commercial
part of the proiect.
Policy 2-12: Storefront Appearances
Require commercial and office structures to exhibit a Keep. Same as Administrative
traditional storefront appearance to the public street. Draft.
Require buildings intended initially for office use to
be designed to accommodate future entrances from
the sidewalk for retail shops. Do not permit the
building to be separated from the public sidewalk by
extensive landscaping or changes in elevation.
4
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-13: Full Range of Housing Opportunities (The Housing Section of the
Land Use Element will be
directed more toward
neighborhood planning.
The Housing Element will
contain the policies on
housing units.)
Provide for a full range of ownership and rental Delete from Land Use Modify Administrative
housing unit densities, including apartments Element. Draft. Delete affordable
and other high-density housing. Housing element objectives. Modify densities
implements this policy (3-1, and housing locations.
3-2\.
Policy 2-14: Housing with Other Development
Consider housing along with non-residential Keep in concept. The Modify. Opportunities for
development, permitting it in addition to the non- mixed-use concept is mixed use are reduced.
residential development. reinforced in many policies.
Policy 2-15: Scale of Residential Development
Ensure that the scale and density of new Keep in concept. Same as Administrative
residential development and remodeling is Neighborhood protection is Draft.
reasonably compatible with the City's addressed in many policies.
predominant single-family residential pattern,
except in areas designated for higher density
housing.
5
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-16: Compatibility of Lot Sizes
Ensure that zoning requests related to lot size Keep. Same as Administrative
consider the need to preserve neighborhood land use (Policy 2-23) Draft.
patterns.
Policy 2-17: Housing Variation in the Urban Core
Encourage variations from the regulations of the Delete. Same as Administrative
zoning district for properties in the urban core area Draft.
in housing type and increased density, making sure
that the development is consistent with the visual
character of surrounding buildings.
Policy 2-18: Privacy in Site Design
Ensure that the site design for a residential project Modify. Same as Administrative
has private indoor and outdoor spaces for each unit Refer to higher density Draft.
and common outdoor recreation space. projects and only outdoor
space. (Policy 2-15)
Policy 2-19: Neighborhood Protection
Protect residential neighborhoods from noise, Keep. (Policy 2-6) Same as Administrative
traffic, light and visually intrusive effects from Draft.
more intense developments with adequate
buffering setbacks, landscaping, walls, activity
limitations, site design and other appropriate
measures.
6
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-20: Minimizing Privacy Intrusion
Keep the sights and sounds of the neighbors from Modify. Included in a Same as Administrative
intruding on residents. Techniques can include broader policy on design Draft.
greater building setbacks, wing walls, window regulations. (Policy 2-16)
shutters and non-transparent glass.
Policy 2-21: Designing for Security
Use design techniques in new development and Delete. Same as Administrative
rehabilitation to increase security and personal Draft.
safety and to increase neighborhood awareness.
Policy 2-22: Monitoring for Over-Saturation
Continue to monitor development activity, fiscal Delete. Same as Administrative
effects and development rates to avoid short-term Development allocation Draft.
over-saturation of the market. system controls
development activity.
Policy 2-23: Conference Facilities
The City may enter into a relationship with a hotel/ Delete. Same as Administrative
conference facilities developer to encourage such a Hasn't been identified as a Draft.
center. current interest.
7
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-24: Urban Focal Points
Intensify the focus of urban development in Valko Keep. Slightly modify. Modify Administrative
Park, North De Anza Boulevard, Town Center, and (Policy 2-1, 2-10, 2-13) Draft. Policy 2-1 is
Stevens Creek Boulevard planning areas, subject to modified to provide
design and transportation network controls. limitations.
Policy 2-25: On-Site Environments
Emphasize attractive, on-site environments during Keep. (Policy 2-14) Same as Administrative
the development review process by giving careful Draft.
attention to building scale and mass, landscaping,
placement, screening of equipment and loading
areas and related design considerations.
Policy 2-26: Public Open Space Development
Encourage development of residential and public Delete. Same as Administrative
open spaces on lands next to major streets to give a Draft.
balanced variety of land uses, to increase the
housing supply and to break current or potential
strip development patterns.
Policy 2-27: Community Gateways
8
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-28: Curb Cuts
Minimize the number of driveway openings, or curb Keep. (Policy 4-8) Modify Administrative
cuts, in each development. Draft. Add that driveway
must accommodate traffic
volume and clarify
maintenance
resDonsibilities.
Policy 2-29: Street Improvement Planning
Plan street improvements such as curb cuts, Keep. Move to Circulation Same as Administrative
sidewalks, bus stop turnouts, bus shelters, light Element. (Policy 4-9) Draft.
poles, benches and trash containers as an integral
part of a project to ensure safe movement of people
and vehicles with the least possible disruption to the
streetscape.
Policy 2-30: Parking Area Layout
Include clearly defined spaces for pedestrians in Keep. Move to Circulation Same as Administrative
parking lots so that foot traffic is separated from the Element. (Policy 4-10) Draft.
hazards of car traffic and people are directed from
their cars to building entries.
9
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-31: Boulevard Landscaping Setback
Require properties fronting North De Anza Keep. (Policy 2-33)
Boulevard to provide a landscaped front setback of
50 feet from the face of the curb, excluding parking
lots.
Policy 2-32: Roadway Design to Offset Barriers
Encourage using design techniques and Modify. The Circulation Modify Administrative
development controls to offset the divisive barrier Element has several policies Draft. Delete reference to
effects of major roadways. related to this concept. reduction of lanes.
(Policy 4-5, Strategy 1)
10
POLICY (Summary)
Policy 2-33: Neighborhood Gateways
Define neighborhood entries through architecture,
landscaping, or land forms appropriate to the formal
or rural character of the neighborhood. Vehicular
electronic security gates should be discouraged,
because they isolate developments. However, if
electronic security gates are proposed, a fence
exception application is required, and approval shall
be based on meeting at least one of the following
criteria, and the fence exception findings:
. Is a mixed-use development, where
the parking for different uses needs
to be separate to assure availability
of parking for each use.
. Includes a below-grade parking
structure where the gates are
required to secure the below-grade
parking.
. Requires gates to obtain federal or
state funding.
. The development is secluded.
. The electronic gates are needed for
demonstrated security reasons.
Administrative Draft
General Plan
Modify. Generalize the
fence exception findings.
Move to neighborhoods
section. (Policy 2-21,
Strategy 4)
Task Force Draft
Same as Administrative
Draft.
11
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-34: Neighborhood Traffic Pattern
Investigation
Investigate neighborhood traffic patterns Keep. Move to Circulation Same as Administrative
comprehensively and find solutions to protect Element. (Policies 4-11 and Draft.
neighborhood streets from through-traffic spillover. 4-12)
Policy 2-35: Foothill Development
Apply a slope-density formula to very low-intensity Modify. Since many of the Same as Administrative
residential development in the hillsides. Density hillside policies have been Draft.
shall be calculated based on the foothill modified, implemented, they are
foothill modified 1/2 acre, and the 5-20 acre slope consolidated into fewer
density formulae. Actual lot sizes and development policies. (Policy 2-44,
areas will be determined through zoning ordinances, Strategy 2)
clustering and identification of significant natural
features.
Pölicy 2-36: Special Hillside Protection Area
The 5-20 acre slope density designation shall provide Modify. Is consolidated Same as Administrative
special hillside protection to form a continuous open into fewer policies. (Policy Draft.
space/very low density buffer west of the existing 2-44, Strategy 2)
urban/ suburban development pattern. The area
shall include the Kaiser property, the Diocese
property, Regnart Canyon area, Inspiration Heights
area and other similar properties.
12
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-37: Previously Designated Very Low
Density: Semi-Rural 5-Acre
Properties previously designated Very Low-Density Keep. (Policy 2-45) Same as Administrative
Residential: Semi-RuraI5-Acre Slope Density Draft.
Formula as described in the amendment to the 1976
General Plan concerning the land use element for the
hillside area may be subdivided utilizing that
formula. Properties previously subdivided in
conformance with the Very Low-Density Residential:
Semi-RuraI5-Acre Slope Density Formula have no
further subdivision potential for residential
purposes.
Policy 2-38: Rezoning in Inspiration Heights
Rezone the shaded area shown in Figure 2-E from Delete. Rezoning Same as Administrative
RI-I0 to RHS. completed. Draft.
13
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-39: Existing legal lots in foothill modified
and foothill modified 1f2-acre slope density
designations.
Existing, vacant legal lots are not considered Modify. Is consolidated Same as Administrative
buildable in the foothill modified and foothill into fewer policies. (Policy Draft.
modified Ij2-acre slope density designations if they 2-46)
are substandard in lot size. They are also considered
unbuildable if development is proposed on slopes
greater than 30%, or on any other areas where
studies have determined the presence of health and
safety problems; this also applies to lots in any R-l
zoning district in the City. An exception process will
be created for an applicant to seek discretionary
approval for an unbuildable parcel.
Policy 2-40: Diocese Property Protection
Apply all hillside protection policies to the Diocese Delete. Property is Same as Administrative
Property, and specifically protect the prominent developed. (Policy 2-35 has Draft.
knoll on the northeast side of the property and the specific Oak Valley
steep, wooded southwest corner of the property. policies).
14
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-41: Urban Service Area BoundaryjLong
Term Growth Boundary
The current urban service area boundary is Modify. (Policy 2-9) Same as Administrative
coterminous with the long term growth boundary. Draft.
The intent of this policy is to limit future
development to lands within the existing urban
service area. The current urban service area shall not
be expanded, except for minor revisions in the
boundary between Cupertino and adjacent cities,
and involving only urbanized, valley floor locations.
The long term growth boundary provides services
within the boundary for the next 20-30 years.
Policy 2-42: Clustering Development in Major
Subdivisions
Lots in major subdivisions in the 5-20 acre slope Keep. (Policy 2-47) Same as Administrative
density designation shall be clustered, reserving 90% Draft.
of the land in private open space to protect the
unique characteristics of the hillsides from adverse
environmental impacts. The project shall keep the
open space area contiguous as much as possible.
15
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-43: Private Open Space Zoning
Establish a private open space zoning district which Delete. The private open Same as Administrative
would allow an owner to designate portions of his space zoning district was Draft.
property for open space with provisions for trail established.
easements, maintenance standards and other items
consistent with preserving the property in its natural
state while retaining it in private ownership.
Policy 2-44: CIustering Development in Minor
Subdivisions
Encourage clustering of development for minor Keep. (Policy 2-47) Same as Administrative
subdivisions in the 5-20 acre slope density Draft.
designation. Encourage reserving and dedicating
90% of the land in private open space to protect the
unique characteristics of the hillsides from adverse
environmental impacts. The project shall keep the
open space contiguous as much as possible.
Policy 2-45: Hillside Building Standards
Establish stricter building and development Modify. Is consolidated Same as Administrative
standards for the hillside area which, among other into fewer policies. (Policy Draft.
things, would provide that views of the ridgelines 2-44)
remain unobstructed and that designs, colors and
materials for homes and other structures blend with
the natural hillside environment.
16
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-46: Ridgeline Visibility
No structures shall be located on ridgelines if visible Modify. Is consolidated Same as Administrative
from new and established valley floor vantage points into fewer policies. (Policy Draft.
unless it is determined that significantly greater 2-44)
environmental impacts would occur if structures are
located elsewhere.
Policy 2-47: Location of Structures
Locate proposed structures to minimize the impacts Keep. (Policy 2-49) Same as Administrative
on adjacent hillside properties and public open Draft.
space.
Policy 2-48: Avoidance of Geologic Hazards
Identify geological hazards on sites proposed for Modify. Is consolidated Same as Administrative
development and avoid or limit development in into fewer policies. (Policy Draft.
those areas. 2-44)
Policy 2-49: Reducing Visible Mass
Effective visible mass shall be reduced through such Modify. Is consolidated Same as Administrative
means as stepping structures down the hillside, into fewer policies. (Policy Draft.
following the natural contours, and limiting the 2-44)
height and mass of the wall plan facing the valley
floor.
17
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-50: Outdoor Lighting
Outdoor lighting should be low intensity and Modify. Is consolidated Same as Administrative
shielded to minimize illumination off-site. into fewer policies. (policy Draft.
2-44)
Policy 2-51: Building Heights
Provide development standards which limit the Modify. Is consolidated Same as Administrative
height and visual impact of structures. into fewer policies. (Policy Draft.
2-44)
Policy 2-52: Steep Slopes
No structures or improvements shall occur on slopes Keep. (Policy 2-46) Same as Administrative
greater than 30% unless an exception is granted. Draft.
Policy 2-53: Rural Improvement Standards in the
Foothills
Require rural improvement standards in the Keep. (Policy 2-48) Same as Administrative
residential hillside zoning ordinance and the hillside Draft.
subdivision regulations to preserve the rural
character of the hillside.
18
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-54: Views for Public Facilities
Design and layout public facilities, particularly Keep. (Policy 2-49) Same as Administrative
public open spaces, so they include views of the Draft.
foothills or other nearby natural features, and plan
hillside developments to minimize visual and other
impacts on adjacent public open space.
Policy 2-55: Hillside Development Proposal
Analysis
Subject proposals for hillside development to prior Delete. Geological review is Modify Administrative
investigation by professional consultants so that called for in the Health and Draft. (See page 6-7)
environmental dangers can be noted and solutions Safety Element. (Policy 6-1)
suggested to lessen potential hazards.
Policy 2-56: Land Disturbance During
Development
Be sure that natural land forms and significant plants Keep. (Policy 2-48) Same as Administrative
and trees are disturbed as little as possible during Draft.
development. All cut and fill shall be rounded to
natural contours and planted with natural
landscaping.
19
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-57: Santa Clara County General Plan
Hillsides policies found in the Santa Clara County Keep. (Policy 2-50) Same as Administrative
General Plan in effect in 1992 are included in the Draft.
Cupertino General Plan by reference and are
applicable to the unincorporated hillside area. These
policies are incorporated because they are consistent
with hillside protection goals. If changes are
proposed in the County plan which are inconsistent
with the City's hillside protection goals, then the
City should protest those changes as well as not
incorporate them into the City's General Plan.
Policy 2-58: County Development
County development, particularly if located near Keep. (Policy 2-51) Same as Administrative
Cupertino's urban fringe area, should consider Draft.
Cupertino's General Plan.
Policy 2-59: Long Term Growth Boundary
Modification to the long term growth boundary is Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
allowed only in conjunction with a comprehensive (Policy 2-9) Draft.
review of the city's General Plan. Revisions to the
long term growth boundary will be referred to the
County of Santa Clara for review and comment.
20
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-60: Existing Uses in the Flood Plain
Allow commercial and recreational uses which are Keep. Move to Health and Same as Administrative
now exclusively within the flood plain to remain in Safety. (Policy 6-43) Draft.
their present use or to be used for agriculture.
Policy 2-61: Non-Recreational Property to
Residential
Designate non-recreational properties to become Delete. Same as Administrative
residential with up to five units allowed under these Draft.
conditions:
a. Forbid structures designed for forced
human habitation, such as dwelling units,
in the natural flood plain. The natural
flood plain is defined by the General Plan
based on data from the Santa Oara Valley
Water District. Unfenced volleyball courts,
picnic tables and similar recreational uses
may be constructed within the natural
flood plain.
b. Base the maximum number of dwelling
units allowed.on each property or group of
properties on the numerical designation
range on the General Plan Map. Land in
the flood plain can be credited in an
amount not to exceed one dwelling unit
per gross acre to determine the number of
dwelling units on each property or group
of Drooerties consolidated into one
21
development plan. If part of the parcel is
outside the flood plain, the maximum
density will be six dwelling units for each
gross acre. This policy makes it impossible
for a relatively small parcel to get a high
density status as a result of one dwelling
unit per acre density credit from a
relatively large area within the flood plain.
The total number of units allowed will be
based on the ability of the applicant and
designer to integrate the development into
the natural environment of Stevens Creek
and the adjacent residential
neighborhoods.
c. Require residential development plans to
incorporate the Stevens Creek trail
described in the public parks section of the
General Plan.
Policy 2-62: Land In NaturaI Flood Plain
Allow public and quasi-public land in the natural Delete. Same as Administrative
flood plain after review of a specific zoning or use Draft.
permit application.
Policy 2-63: Solar Access and Protection
Ensure that all homes have an acceptable balance of Keep. Is a strategy in Modify Administrative
access to the sun and protection from it, as well as Environmental Resources Draft. (Strategies are
control of prevailing winds. Element. (Policy 5-2) modified)
22
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-64: Planning for Schools
Recognize the financial impact of increased Keep. (Policy 2-52)
development on the school districts' ability to
provide staff and facilities. Work with the districts
to assure that the continued high level of school
services can be provided prior to granting approval
for new development.
Policy 2-65: Busing Access to the Hillsides.
If busing continues, encourage district staff to Delete. Same as Administrative
become more involved in hillside roadway design to Draft.
meet the minimum standards required for busing
access.
Policy 2-66: Pedestrian Access
Create pedestrian access between new subdivisions Keep. (Policy 2-2) Same as Administrative
and school sites. Draft.
23
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-67: Permit Data for Schools
Continue to provide school districts with building Delete. Schools are Same as Administrative
permit data, which will enable the Districts to record informed of city Draft.
the type of construction, location and their square development through
footage to plan for future schooling needs. general plan amendments,
subdivisions and school fees
collected for new
development.
Policy 2-68: De Anza College
Allow land uses not traditionally considered part of Modify. Encourage Same as Administrative
a college, such as lodging or conference facilities and commercial and residential Draft.
institutional office and research facilities, to be built use and relating buildings
at De Anza College. Final determination of the to the street. (Policy 2-37)
intensity, character and ultimate desirability will be
evaluated with regard to the effects on traffic and the
consistency with the college's educational nature.
Policy: 2-69: Library Service Level
Recognize that if the community desires a higher Keep. The new library is Same as Administrative
level of library service, that this would require acknowledged. (Policy 2- Draft.
cooperation between the County of Santa Clara and 55)
City of Cupertino in expanding library services and
facilities if deemed necessary.
24
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-70: Library Planning
Integrate and coordinate the library system into all Keep. (Policy 2-56) Same as Administrative
applicable General Plan policies, such as Draft.
transportation, pedestrian and bike trails.
Policy 2-71: Improving Library Service
Encourage the library to incorporate new technology Keep. (Policy 2-57) Same as Administrative
to improve service levels at the library system. Draft.
Encourage the adjustment of library collections and Keep. (Policy 2-57) Same as Administrative
programs to meet the needs of Cupertino residents, Draft.
businesses and ethnic populations.
Policy 2-72: Library Expansion
Actively seek methods to increase library facilities. Delete. Same as Administrative
Draft.
Policy 2-73: Landmark Rehabilitation
Undertake an active partnership with private owners Keep. (Policy 2-58) Same as Administrative
of landmark structures to rehabilitate the buildings Draft.
for public or semi-private occupancy and retain their
historic character.
25
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-74: Archaeologically Sensitive Areas
For development sites in areas likely to be Keep. (Policy 2-59) Same as Administrative
archaeologically sensitive, such as along stream Draft.
courses and in oak groves, the City development
review process should require a specific
investigation to determine if significant
archaeological resources may be affected by the
project, and should also require appropriate
mitigation measures in the project design.
Policy 2-75: Native American Burials
Recognize that Native American burials may be Keep. (Policy 2-60) Same as Administrative
uncovered in unexpected locations and that State Draft.
law prescribes the appropriate actions to take upon
discovery of such burials during construction,
including stoppage of work in surrounding area,
notification of appropriate authorities and reburial of
remains in an appropriate manner.
Policy 2-76: Heritage Trees
Protect and maintain heritage trees in a healthy state. Keep. (Policy 2-61) Same as Administrative
A heritage tree list shall be established and Draft.
periodically revised to include trees of importance to
the community.
26
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-77: Public Arts
Stimulate opportunities for the arts through Keep. A strategy is Same as Administrative
cooperative relations between local business and the proposed that a 1 % public Draft.
City. art fee be set aside for new
development. (Policv 2-62)
Policy 2-78: Boundaries Between Land Uses
Base boundaries between land use classifications Keep. (Policy 2-82) Same as Administrative
generally upon lot lines of established land use Draft.
activities, public streets, and constructed or natural
physical barriers or a combination of any of these.
Show the precise boundary on the zoning map.
Policy 2-79: Residential Density Ranges on the
Map
Recognize that residential density ranges on the Keep. (Policy 2-83) Same as Administrative
General Plan Map and its legend show the desired Draft.
development intensity for a general area. Also
recognize that the actual gross dwelling unit density
may be slightly different if the properties reflect the
general development character of neighboring
properties.
27
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-80: Public and Quasi-Public Activities and
Land
Allow public and quasi-public activities to be located Already deleted. Proposed Same as Administrative
within any land use designation in the General Plan General Plan includes a Draft.
upon zoning review approval to ensure modification of this policy.
compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood (Policy 2-84)
and the street and utility system capacity. Allow
residential land uses in areas designated for quasi-
public uses with appropriate zoning changes.
Policy 2-81: Closed School Site Use
Designate all public school sites for public use Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
provided that schools that are closed may be used (Policy 2-85) Draft.
for quasi-public or institutional activities or both, or
for housing. The dwelling unit intensity and
development pattern shall reflect the character of the
surrounding residential districts. The future of
unused school sites shall also reflect the park
acquisition program in the Environmental Resources
Element.
28
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 2-82: New Drive-Up Services
Permit new drive-up service facilities for Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
commercial, industrial or institutional use only when (Policy 2-86) Draft.
adequate circulation, parking, noise control,
architecture features, and landscaping are
compatible with the visual character of the
surrounding uses and residential areas are
adequately buffered. Further evaluate any proposed
site for conformance with other goals and policies of
the Plan.
Policy 2-83: Late-Evening Entertainment Activities
Discourage late-evening entertainment activities Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
such as cocktail lounges, recreational facilities and (Policy 2-87) Draft.
theaters in the relatively narrow depth of Stevens
Creek Boulevard properties, but encourage them in
Town Center, Valko Park and other large properties
that are isolated from residential districts and can
provide internal security.
G:\Planning\GenPlan\LandUse\Land Use Matrix 3.doc
29
HOUSING ELEMENT
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 3-1: Sufficient Residentially Zoned Land for
New Construction Need.
Designate sufficient residentially-zoned land at Modify. Accommodate Modify Administrative
appropriate densities to provide adequate sites that 4,615 units for the 20-year Draft. Accommodate
will meet and exceed ABAG's estimate of General Plan timeline. original 2,325 units
Cupertino's new construction need of 2,325 units for (approximately). Eliminate
2001-2006. The following objectives meet that need. affordable categories.
Policy 3-2: Housing Mitigation Plan.
Assign priority to households who live or work in Keep. Same as Administrative
Cupertino for BMR units produced through the plan Draft.
or affordable housing units built with mitigation
fees.
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 3-3: Range of Housing Types.
Encourage the development of diverse housing stock Keep. Same as Administrative
that provides a range of housing types (including Draft.
smaller, moderate cost housing) and affordable
levels. Emphasize the provision of housing for
lower and moderate income households and, also,
households with wage earners who provide service
(e.g. school district employees, municipal and public
safety employees, etc.)
Policy 3-4: Housing Rehabilitation.
Pursue and/ or provide funding for the construction Keep. Same as Administrative
or rehabilitation of housing that is affordable to very Draft.
low, low and moderate income households. Actively
support and assist non-profit and for profit
developers in producing affordable units.
2
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 3-5: Development of Mfordable Housing.
Maintain andfor adopt appropriate land use Keep. Same as Administrative
regulations and other development tools to Draft.
encourage the development of affordable housing.
Make every reasonable effort to disperse units
throughout the community but not at the expense of
undermining the fundamental goal of providing
affordable units.
Policy 3-6: Tax Increment Funds.
Use a minimum of 25% of tax increment funds Keep. Same as Administrative
generated from the Redevelopment Project Area for Draft.
housing activities that create affordable housing for
lower and moderate income households. Set aside
5% of the 25% for extremely low income housing.
Policy 3-7: Housing Densities.
Provide a full range of ownership and rental housing Keep. Modify Administrative
unit densities, including apartments and other high- Draft. Delete references to
density housing. converting commercial land
to residential land and to
exceeding densities.
3
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 3-8: Maintenance and Repair.
Assist very low and low income homeowners and Keep. Same as Administrative
rental property owners in maintaining and repairing Draft.
their housing units.
Policy 3-9: Conservation of Housing Stock.
Conserve the existing stock of owner and rental Keep. Same as Administrative
housing units, which provide affordable housing Draft. Modify
opportunities for lower and moderate-income Implementation Program 26
households regarding redevelopment of
rental housing.
Policy 3-10: Energy Conservation.
Encourage energy conservation in all existing and Keep. Same as Administrative
new residential development. Draft.
Policy 3-11: Special Needs Households.
Support organizations that provide services to Keep. Same as Administrative
special need households in the City: such as Draft.
homeless, elderly, disabled and single parent.
4
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 3-12: Housing Discrimination.
Support programs and organizations that seek to Keep. Same as Administrative
eliminate housing discrimination. Draft.
5
Circulation
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 4-1: City Participation in Regional
Transportation
Participate actively in developing regional Keep. (policy 4-1) Modify Administrative
approaches to meeting the transportation needs of Draft. Remove reference to
residents of the Santa Clara Valley. Downtown Village.
1
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 4-2: Traffic Capacity and Land Use
Limitations
Maintain a reasonable minimum LOS D for major Keep. Modify. (Policy 4-5) Modify Administrative
intersections during the a.m. and p.m. peak traffic Draft. Delete reference to
hours (highest single hours) by imposing reasonable lane reduction. Add
limits on land use to ensure that principal reference to synchronization
thoroughfares are not unduly impacted by locally of traffic signals.
generated traffic during the peak traffic hour.
In order to accommodate development which
furthers a unique community-gathering place on
Stevens Creek Boulevard, the intersection of Stevens
Creek and De Anza boulevards and De Anza
Boulevard and Bollinger Road may maintain a LOS
E+ (No more than 45 seconds weighted delay).
For land use and transportation planning purposes,
the traffic peak hour should not be allowed to
expand into the peak period. Staggering of work
hours beyond current levels is not acceptable as a
transportation demand management (TDM)
technique. The TDM technique must benefit both
the peak hour traffic and the average daily traffic
volume.
2
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 4-3: Coordination of Street Improvements
Develop the street construction plan ensuring critical Delete. Same as Administrative
street improvements are finished before or at the Draft.
same time as major developments. The plan should
be based on the principle of equity, ensuring that
land developers help pay for street improvements.
Policy 4-4: Driveway Interconnection
Discourage direct access from adjoining properties to Keep. Slightly modify. Modify Administrative
major arterial streets. Require access by (Policy 4-8) Draft. Ensure that
interconnecting private driveway networks linking driveway accommodates
side streets or other major entrance points urness this the traffic volume for all
is unsafe or impractical because of the established affected properties.
development pattern.
Policy 4-5: Protection From Effects of
Transportation System
Work to protect the community from noise, fumes Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
and hazards caused by the City's transportation (Policy 4-15) Draft.
system.
3
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 4-6: Neighborhood Traffic Management
Develop traffic management plans for Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
neighborhoods affected by unacceptable levels of (Policy 4-11) Draft.
through traffic. Design these plans based on the
concept that commute or through traffic should be
redirected from local residential streets and minor
collectors to the freeway, expressway and arterial
and major collector streets.
Policy 4-7: Abusive Driving
Continue to study and carry out techniques that Delete. Is addressed Same as Administrative
discourage abusive driving on local neighborhood through traffic calming Draft.
streets, including intensified enforcement of speed policies.
laws, enforcement of State muffler laws and review
of traffic management strategies.
Policy 4-8: Reliance on Usage of Private Cars
.
Promote a general decrease in reliance on private Keep. (Policy 4-2) Same as Administrative
cars by accommodating and encouraging attractive Draft.
alternatives.
4
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 4-9: Regional Trail Development
Continue to plan and provide for a comprehensive Modify. See Land Use Same as Administrative
system of trails and pathways consistent with Element. (policy 2-68) Draft.
regional systems, including the Bay Trail, Stevens
Creek Corridor and Ridge Trail. The general
alignment of the Bay Trail, as shown in the
Association of Bay Area Governments' Bay Trail
planning document, is incorporated in the General
Plan by reference.
G:\Planning\ GenPlan \ Circulation \ Transportation Matrix2.doc
5
Environmental Resources
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-1: Williamson Act Properties
Designate properties under the Williamson Act Delete. Same as Administrative
contracts in the General Plan for their anticipated Draft.
developed use to plan for future public service and
utility demands and to ensure that development will
be consistent with community character.
Policy 5-2: Agricultural Recognition
Recognize and support agricultural land uses, which Delete. Same as Administrative
provide food and fiber, enhance air quality and Draft.
visually and functionally define rural/ open areas
from urban land uses during public land use and
urban development review processes.
Policy 5-3: Farming and Grazing
Maintain farming and grazing on the hillsides to Delete. Same as Administrative
preserve open space and monitor to prevent erosion. Draft.
1
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-4: Air Pollution Effects
Continue to assess air pollution effects of future land Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
use and circulation planning. Review projects for (Policies 5-4 and 5-5) Draft.
toxic air contaminants at time of approval.
Policy 5-5: Dust Control
Continue to require the use of water or oil to control Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
dust during construction activities. (Policy 5-4) Draft.
Policy 5-6: Clean Air Education
Initiate a citywide public education program Modify. Same as Administrative
regarding the implications of the Oean Air Act and Ban new wood burning Draft.
provide information on ways to control emissions. fireplaces. (Policy 5-7)
Policy 5-7: Regional Cooperation
Actively pursue cooperation among regional Keep. (Is a strategy.) (Policy Same as Administrative
agencies to improve air quality. 5-4) Draft.
Policy 5-8: Land Use Decisions
Ensure that local land use decisions support the goal Keep. (Is a strategy.) (Policy Same as Administrative
of clean air. 5-4) Draft.
2
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-9: Home Occupations
Continue to allow home occupations in all Keep. (Is a strategy.) (Policy Same as Administrative
residentially zoned properties. 5-5) Draft.
Policy 5-10: Street Trees
Increase street trees on public property and tree Keep. (Is a strategy.) (Policy Same as Administrative
planting on private property. 5-5) Draft.
Policy 5-11: Fuel-Efficient Vehicles
Look into buying more fuel-efficient vehicles for City Keep. (Is a strategy.) (Policy Same as Administrative
use. 5-5) Draft.
Policy 5-12: Jogging and Bicycling Warnings
Use the Cupertino Scene and other publications to Delete. Same as Administrative
tell residents about the danger of inhaling pollutants Draft.
while jogging and bicycling near busy streets.
Expand the par course and jogging trails to meet
demand.
Policy 5-13: Public Project Landscaping
Encourage public and quasi-public agencies to Keep. (Policy 5-8) Modify Administrative
landscape their city area projects near native Draft. Add drought
vegetation with appropriate native plants. tolerant, non-invasive, non-
native plants.
3
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-14: Development Near Sensitive Areas
Encourage the clustering of new development away Keep. (Policy 5-9) Modify Administrative
from sensitive areas such as riparian corridors, Draft. Require approval of
wildlife habitat and corridors, public open space harmonious landscaping
preserves and ridgelines. plans for new development.
Consider specific protection tools for riparian
corridor protection, such as a riparian corridor
ordinance or development and preservation
guidelines.
Policy 5-15: Landscaping Near Natural Vegetation
Emphasize drought tolerant native plants and Keep. (Policy 5-10) Modify Administrative
ground covers when landscaping properties near Draft. (Same as 5-9)
natural vegetation, particularly for control of erosion
from disturbance to natural terrain.
Policy 5-16: Natural Area Protection
Minimize lawn area and maximize the number of Keep. (Is a strategy.) (Policy Modify Administrative
native trees. 5-11) Draft. (Same as 5-9)
Amend the RHS ordinance to emphasize drought
tolerant native plants and native trees and to
minimize lawn area.
4
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-17: Hillside Property Fencing
Confine fencing on hillside property to the area Keep. (Policy 5-12) Same as Administrative
around a building, rather than around an entire site, Draft.
to allow for migration of wild animals.
Policy 5-18: Recreation in Natural Areas
Limit recreation in natural areas to activities Keep. (Policy 5-13) Modify Administrative
compatible with preserving natural vegetation, such Draft. Add mountain
as hiking, horseback riding and camping. biking.
Policy 5-19: Public Access
Provide public access to wildlife observation and Delete. Same as Administrative
fishing sites consistent with preserving important Draft.
wildlife habitat.
Policy 5-20: Recreation and Wildlife Trails
Provide open space linkages within and between Keep. (Policy 5-14) Same as Administrative
properties for both recreational and wildlife Draft.
activities, most specifically for the benefit of wildlife
which is threatened, endangered or designated as
species of special concern.
5
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-21: Mineral Resource Areas
New mineral extraction areas may be considered Keep. (Policy 5-15) Same as Administrative
within Cupertino's sphere of influence, but the Draft.
cumulative impact of existing and proposed activity
should not exceed present operations in terms of
noise and traffic. Work with Santa Clara County to
assure that mining operations outside the City limits
are consistent with the City's General Plan, that
restoration plans are adequate, and that mining
activity is not extended into undisturbed lands
without adequate documentation of economic
purpose and environmental impacts and mitigations.
Policy 5-22: Mineral Extraction Controls
Control scenic restoration and noise pollution as well Keep. (Policy 5-16) Same as Administrative
as air and water pollution in mineral extraction Draft.
quarrying, processing and transportation.
6
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-23: Incompatible Land Use
Conserve mineral resource areas outside the City by Keep. (Policy 5-17) Same as Administrative
not allowing incompatible land uses in and around Draft.
identified mineral resource areas. Uses considered
incompatible are high density residential, low
density residential with high unit value, public
facilities and industrial and commercial uses with
intensive impacts.
Policy 5-24: Recreation at Old Quarries
Look into the desirability of designating abandoned Keep. (Policy 5-18) Same as Administrative
quarries for passive recreation to rehabilitate the Draft.
land.
Policy 5-25: Ground Water Recharge Sites
Continue to support the Santa Clara Valley Water Keep. (Policy 5-24) Same as Administrative
District to find and develop groundwater recharge Draft.
sites within Cupertino's planning area and provide
for public recreation at the site where possible.
Policy 5- 26: Other Water Sources
Encourage the research of other water sources, Keep. (Policy 5-25) Same as Administrative
including water reclamation. Draft.
7
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-27: Industrial Water Recycling
Encourage industrial projects, especially at the Keep. (Policy 5-26) Same as Administrative
building permit approval stage, to have long-term Draft.
conservation measures including recycling
equipment for manufacturing and pooling water
supplies in the plant. Work with the Cupertino
Sanitary District to carry out this policy.
Policy 5-28: Natural Creek Beds
Retain creek beds, riparian corridors, water courses Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
and associated vegetation in their natural state to (Policy 5-27) Draft.
protect wildlife habitat and recreation potential and
assist groundwater percolation.
Policy 5- 29: Interagency Coordination
Actively pursue interagency coordination for Keep. (Policy 5-28) Same as Administrative
regional water supply problem solving. Draft.
Policy 5- 30: Reglin Water Annexation
Recognize that additional capacity requirements Delete. Same as Administrative
placed on Reglin Mutual Water Company would Draft.
require that one of the adjoining utility companies
annex and service users in the next decade (through
¡ year 2001).
8
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5- 31: Local Conservation Policies Similar to
Regionwide Policies
Continue to keep citywide efforts of water Keep. (policy 5-29) Same as Administrative
conservation similar to those being conducted on a Draft.
regional scale. Many of these conservation efforts
are outlined in the Santa Clara Valley Water District
Drought Plan and Countywide Water Use Reduction
program.
Policy 5- 32: Public Information Effort
Continue providing the public information Modify. (Policy 5-30) Modify Administrative
regarding the status of the drought and water Draft. Add reference to
conservation techniques. Consider sending regular impervious surfaces
notices to households and businesses on water impacts.
prohibitions, water allocations and conservation tips.
Continue to air conservation videotapes on the City's
government channel. Continue to provide water
conservation kits to the community upon request.
9
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-33: Prohibit Excessive Water Use
Prohibit excessive water uses throughout the City, Modify. (policy 5-31) Same as Administrative
such as irrigation of existing landscaping during the Draft.
daylight, and require large water users to perform
water audits. These and other policies shall be
enforced until such time as an official declaration has
been made by Santa Clara Valley Water District that
the drought conditions no longer exist.
Policy 5- 34: Water Conservation Program
Undertake programs for long-term water Keep. (Is a strategy.) (Policy Same as Administrative
conservation at City buildings including installation 5-31) Draft.
of low flow toilets and installation of automatic shut
off valves in sinks of park buildings.
Policy 5-35: Nonpoint Source Pollution
Continue to support and participate in the Santa Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
Clara Valley Nonpoint Source Pollution Control (Policy 5-32) Draft.
Program in order to cooperatively reduce nonpoint
source pollution with other cities that discharge
storm waters into San Francisco Bay.
10
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-36: Storm Water Runoff
Encourage the reduction of impervious surface areas Keep. (Policy 5-34) Same as Administrative
and investigate opportunities to retain or detain Draft.
storm runoff on new development.
Policy 5-37: Development on Septic Systems
Do not permit urban development to occur in areas Keep. (policy 5-35) Same as Administrative
not served by a sanitary sewer system, except the Draft.
previously approved Regnart Canyon Development.
Policy 5-38: Public Information
Continue to act as a liaison between PG&E and the Delete. Same as Administrative
community in providing energy efficiency Draft.
information.
Policy 5-39: Stevens Creek Park
The Santa Clara County Parks program should Keep. (Park and Open Same as Administrative
pursue the goal of connecting upper and lower Space policies are located in Draft.
Stevens Creek Parks. The County parks budget Land Use Element.) (Policy
should pursue acquisition to the extent possible, and 2-62)
emphasize passive park development in keeping
with the pristine nature of the hillsides.
11
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-40: Stevens Creek Reservoir
Work to keep the watershed and storage basin Delete. Same as Administrative
properties of Stevens Creek Reservoir in public Draft.
ownership if the Santa Clara Valley Water District
decides to abandon it.
Policy 5-41: Continuous Open Space
Actively pursue inter-agency cooperation in buying Modify. (Policy 2-63) Same as Administrative
properties near the western planning area boundary Draft.
to complete a continuous open space green belt
along the lower foothills, with a special focus on
purchase of the Diocese property.
Policy 5-42: Open Space and Trail Linkages
Work to provide the open space lands and trail Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
linkages described in Figures 5-D, E, F. (Policy 2-68) Draft.
Policy 5-43: Private Open Space and Recreational
Facilities
Encourage the continued existence and profitability Keep. (Policy 2-66) Same as Administrative
of private open space and recreation facilities Draft.
through incentive and development controls.
12
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-44: Public Use of Private Open Space
Seek cooperation from private land owners for Keep. (Policy 2-67) Same as Administrative
public use of private open space. Draft.
Policy 5-45: Park Acreage
Provide park land equal to a minimum of three acres Keep. (Policy 2-69) Same as Administrative
for each 1,000 residents. Draft.
Policy 5-46: Park Walking Distance
Ensure that each household is within a half mile Keep. (Policy 2-70) Same as Administrative
walk of the park and that the route is reasonably free Draft.
of physical barriers, including streets with heavy
traffic.
13
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-47: Park Minimum Acreage
Plan parks to be at least 3.5 acres for flexibility of Keep. (Policy 2-72) Modify Administrative
use. The acquisition and development of parks less Draft. Add consideration of
than 3.5 acres may be considered according to the pocket parks.
following priorities:
High Priority - Designated neighborhoods which have no
park or recreation areas.
Moderate Priority - Designated neighborhoods which
have school grounds and no park land.
Low Priority - Designated neighborhoods which have park or
recreation areas less than three acres per 1,000 residents.
Policy 5-48: Park Design
Design parks informally to make use flexible and Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
long-term maintenance costs low. (Policy 2-73) Draft.
Policy 5-49: Park Street Access
Ensure that parks are bounded by public streets. Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
When possible, re-evaluate parks that meet (Policy 2-74) Draft.
minimum size requirements to see if it is feasible to
install a perimeter road.
14
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-50: Neighborhood N
New residential development in Neighborhood N Delete. Same as Administrative
should provide a public neighborhood park based Draft.
upon the City's park dedication ordinance.
Subsequently, the boundaries of neighborhoods N
and El should be redrawn to reflect the additional
park site.
Policy 5-51: Neighborhoods J-1, J-2, K
Make the final determination regarding a Delete. The need for park Same as Administrative
neighborhood park site after the completion of acreage in this area is Draft.
Cupertino Union School District's Sedgwick School shown in Table 2-C
master plan.
Policy 5-52: Park and Open Space Acquisition
Program
The City's park acquisition is defined by Table 5-B. Keep. (Policy 2-76) See Same as Administrative
The Acquisition Program is based upon three broad Table 2-C Draft.
acquisition objectives:
1. Complete the Parks Acquisition Program.
2. Maintain an adequate inventory of sports fields.
3. Retain creek site and other natural open space areas
identified in the Open Space section of the General Plan.
15
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 5-53: New Residential Development in
Non-residential Areas
New residential development in non-residential Keep. (Policy 2-79) Same as Administrative
areas shall provide park and recreational space and Draft.
facilities. The need for dedication of public park
land and the provision of private recreational space
and facilities shall be determined when a master
plan is submitted for the development, based on the
following criteria:
Policy 5-54: Recreational Facilities
The City of Cupertino recognizes the public benefit Modify. (Policy 2-81)
derived from a recreational gymnasium and Same as Administrative
swimming pool and should such a facility be Draft.
developed, the City shall pursue all possible
partnerships, including school districts, non-profit
organizations and the corporate community, as a
means of funding and operating the facilities.
G:\Planning\GenPlan\Env. Resources.Noise\Environmental Matrix 2.doc
16
Health and Safety Element
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-1: Seismk/Geologic Review Process
Adopt and use a formal seismic/ geologic review Keep. Slightly modify. Modify Administrative
process to evaluate new development proposals all (Policy 6-1) Draft.
over the City.
Policy 6-2: Public Education on Seismic Safety
Continue the public education program to help Keep. (Policy 6-2) Same as Administrative
residents reduce earthquake hazards. Draft.
Policy 6-3: County Fire Hazard Reduction
Encourage the county to put into effect the fire Keep. (Policy 6-4) Same as Administrative
reduction policies in the County Public Safety Draft.
Element.
Policy 6-4: Fuel Management to Reduce Fire
Hazard
Encourage the Midpeninsula Open Space District Keep. (Policy 6-5 Same as Administrative
and the County Parks Department to continue efforts Draft.
in fuel management to reduce fire hazard.
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-5: Green Fire Breaks
Encourage the Midpeninsula Open Space District to Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
consider" green" fire break uses for open space (Policy 6-6) Draft.
lands. This could include commercial timber
harvesting.
Policy 6-6: Residential Fire Sprinklers
Continue to require fire sprinklers in new residential Keep.
construction located in hillside areas and on flag lots.
Policy 6-7: Hillside Access Routes
Require new hillside development to have Keep. (Policy 6-15) Same as Administrative
frequent grade breaks in access routes to ensure Draft.
a timely response of fire personnel.
Policy 6-8: Hillside Road Upgrades
Require new hillside development to upgrade Keep. (Policy 6-16) Same as Administrative
existing access roads to meet Fire Code and City Draft.
standards.
2
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-9: Early Project Review
Involve the Central Fire Protection District in the Keep. (Policy 6-7) Same as Administrative
early design stage of all projects requiring public Draft.
review to assure fire department input and plan
modifications as needed.
Policy 6-10: Growth Cooperation
Encourage cooperation between water utility Keep. (Policy 6-19) Same as Administrative
companies and the Central Fire District in order to Draft.
keep water systems in pace with growth and
firefighting service needs.
Policy 6-11: Fire Fighting Upgrade Needs
Encourage utilities to consider Central Fire District's Keep. (Policy 6-20) Same as Administrative
firefighting needs when upgrading water systems. Draft.
Policy 6-12: Roadway Design
Attempt to involve the Central Fire District in the Keep. (Policy 6-13) Same as Administrative
design of public roadways for review and comment. Draft.
Attempt to ensure that roadways have frequent
median breaks for timely access to properties.
3
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-13: Fire Prevention
Continue to promote fire prevention through Keep. (Policy 6-9) Same as Administrative
city-initiated, public education programs either Draft.
through the government television channel
andf or the Cupertino Scene.
Policy 6-14: Multi-Story Building Fire Risks
Recognize that multi-story buildings of any land use Keep. (policy 6-10) Same as Administrative
type increases risks of fire. Ensure that adequate fire Draft.
protection is built into the design and require on-site
fire suppression materials and equipment to ensure
safety of the community.
Policy 6-15: Residential Fire Sprinkler Ordinance
Consider adopting a residential fire sprinkler Keep. (policy 6-11) Same as Administrative
ordinance. This will reduce both fire flows and the Draft.
need for firefighting personnel and equipment.
Policy 6-16: Commercial and Industrial Fire
Protection Guidelines
Coordinate with the Fire District to develop new Keep. (Policy 6-8) Same as Administrative
guidelines for fire protection for commercial and Draft.
industrial land uses.
4
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-17: Private Residential Entry Gates
Discourage the use of private residential entry gates Keep. (Policy 6-17) Same as Administrative
which act as a barrier to emergency service Draft.
personnel.
Policy 6-18: Dead-End Street Access
Allow public use of private roadways during an Keep. (Policy 6-14) Same as Administrative
emergency for hillside subdivisions that have dead- Draft.
end public streets longer than 1,000 feet or find a
secondary means of access.
Policy 6-19: Smoke Detectors
Continue to require smoke detectors in new Keep. (Policy 6-12) Modify Administrative
residential construction and continue to support fire Draft. Require smoke
protection agencies' education of homeowners on detectors in all new
installation of smoke detectors. Use the Cupertino residential units at time of
Scene to publicize fire hazards and correction sale or rental.
methods.
5
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-20: No New Construction in Flood Plains
Adopt stringent land use and building code Keep. Modify strategies. Same as Administrative
requirements to prevent new construction in already (Policy 6-44) Draft.
urbanized flood hazard areas recognized by the
Federal Flood Insurance Administrator. For
example, the finished floors of new construction
must be higher than the water level projected for the
100-year flood. A description of flood zone
regulations and a map of potential flood hazard
areas will be published in the Cupertino Scene.
Policy 6-21: Prohibit Dwellings in Natural Flood
Plain
Continue the policy of prohibiting all forms of Delete. Same as Administrative
habitable development in natural flood plains. This Draft.
includes prohibiting fill materials and obstructions
that may increase flood potential downstream or
modify natural streamsides.
6
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-22: Restrict Hillside Grading
Continue to restrict the extent and timing of hillside Keep. (Policy 6-46) Same as Administrative
grading operations to April through October. Draft.
Require performance bonds during the remaining
time to guarantee the repair of any erosion damage.
All graded slopes must be planted as soon as
practical after grading is complete.
Policy 6-23: Evaluate City Water-Storage Facilities
Program necessary funds to evaluate the structural Modify. (Policy 6-47) Same as Administrative
integrity of municipal water-storage facilities, Draft.
including distribution line connections and any
necessary repairs. Possible flood speeds and flooded
areas should be included. The study consultant will
confer with the City's geological consultant to
determine the geology and the maximum expected
ground shaking intensities of the tank site.
Policy 6-24: Land Use Decision Evaluation
Use Figures 6-K, 6-L , 6-M and the City Municipal Delete. Same as Administrative
Code to evaluate land use decisions. Draft.
7
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-25: Freeway Design and Neighborhood
Noise
Ensure that roads along the West Valley Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
Transportation Corridor are designed and improved (Policy 6-49) Draft.
in a way that minimizes neighborhood noise.
Policy 6-26: Support Stricter State Noise Laws
Continue to support enactment of stricter state laws Keep. (Policy 6-50) Same as Administrative
on noise emissions from new motor vehicles and Draft.
enforce existing street laws on noise emissions.
Policy 6-27: Neighborhood Need Priority
Continue to review the needs of residents for Keep. (Policy 6-51) Same as Administrative
convenience and safety and make them a priority Draft.
over the convenient movement of commute or
through traffic where practical.
Policy 6-28: Solutions to Street Abuse
Continue to evaluate solutions to discourage Keep. (Policy 6-52) Same as Administrative
through traffic in neighborhoods through modified Draft.
street design. Examples include meandering streets,
diverters, landscape islands, street closures and wide
parking strips.
8
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-29: Noise Improvement by Restricting
Trucks
Continue to work toward improving the noise Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
environment along Foothill Boulevard and Stevens (Policy 6-53) Draft.
Creek Boulevard by restricting quarry truck traffic
especially during late evening and early morning
hours. It is preferable that the restrictions be
voluntary. Encourage alternative to truck transport,
specifically rail, when feasible.
Policy 6-30: Reduction of Noise from Kaiser
Permanente Trucks
Work to carry out noise mitigation measures listed in Modify. (Policy 6-54) Same as Administrative
the Edward L. Pack and Associates report (County of Draft.
Santa Clara) to diminish noise from Kaiser
Permanente truck traffic for homes near Foothill and
Stevens Creek Boulevards.
Policy 6-31: Commercial Delivery Areas
Be sure new commercial or industrial developments Keep. (policy 6-56) Same as Administrative
plan their delivery areas so they are away from Draft.
existing or planned homes.
9
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-32: Limit Delivery Hours
Continue active enforcement of Section 10.45 of the Keep. (Policy 6-57) Same as Administrative
Municipal Code limiting commercial and industrial Draft.
delivery hours adjoining residential uses.
Policy 6-33: Noise Control Techniques
Continue to require analysis and implementation of Keep. (Policy 6-58) Same as Administrative
techniques to control the effects of noise from Draft.
industrial equipment and processes for projects near
homes.
Policy 6-34: Restrict Hours of Construction Work
Continue to restrict non-emergency building Keep. (Policy 6-59) Same as Administrative
construction work near homes during evening, early Draft.
morning, and weekends.
Policy 6-35: Comprehensive Noise Ordinance
Development
Develop a comprehensive noise ordinance that gives Delete. Same as Administrative
time restrictions on commercial and industrial Draft.
deliveries, and establishes procedures for regulating
noisy animals.
10
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-36: Noise Wall Requirements
Exercise discretion in requiring noise walls to be sure Keep. (Policy 6-61) Same as Administrative
that all other measures of noise control have been Draft.
explored and that the noise wall blends with the
neighborhood.
Policy 6-37: Neighborhood Awareness Programs
Continue to support the Neighborhood Awareness Keep. (Policy 6-22) Same as Administrative
Program and others intended to help neighborhoods Draft.
prevent crime through social interaction.
Policy 6-38: Public Perimeter Roads for Parks
Encircle neighborhood parks with a public road to Keep. (Policy 6-23) Same as Administrative
provide visual accessibility whenever possible. Draft.
Policy 6-39: Crime Prevention in Building Design
Consider the relationship between building design Keep. (Policy 6-24) Same as Administrative
and crime prevention in reviewing all developments. Draft.
Develop criteria with help from the Sheriff's Office
to determine the degree to which crime prevention
standards should override esthetic concerns.
II
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-40: Fiscal Impacts
Recognize fiscal impacts to the County Sheriff and Keep. (Policy 6-25) Same as Administrative
City of Cupertino when approving various land use Draft.
mIXes.
Policy 6-41: Pre-hearing Review
Continue to request County Sheriff review and Keep. (policy 6-26) SmneasAdministrative
comment on development applications for security Draft.
measures.
Policy 6- 42: Emergency Service Training Program
Continue to train employees annually in disaster Keep. (Policy 6-34) Same as Administrative
preparedness, first-aid and CPR. Draft.
Policy 6-43: Hmn Radio Operators
Continue to support the training and cooperation Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
between the city and ham operators to prepare for (Policy 6-36) Draft.
emergency communications needs.
Policy 6- 44: Community Preparedness
Continue to provide training to the community on Modify. (Policy 6-33) Same as Administrative
self-preparedness for emergencies. Draft.
12
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-45: Informed Citizenry
Use the Cupertino Scene and other communication Modify. (Policy 6-33) Same as Administrative
methods to inform residents that they have a Draft.
responsibility to be prepared for emergency disasters
and give information on how to achieve this self-
reliance.
Policy 6- 46: Business Storage Containers for
Emergency Supplies
Prepare an ordinance for businesses that defines Delete. Same as Administrative
policies for establishing an emergency supply Draft.
container on a business property.
Policy 6-47: Emergency Operation Center
Continue to annually train all city employees on the Keep. (Policy 6-34) Same as Administrative
operations of the EOC. Draft.
Policy 6-48: Hazardous Materials Storage
Continue to require the proper storage and disposal Keep. (Policy 6-27) Same as Administrative
of hazardous materials to prevent leakage, potential Draft.
explosions, fire or the release of harmful fumes.
13
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-49: Proximity of Residents to Hazardous
Materials
When new residential development or childcare Keep. (Policy 6-28) Same as Administrative
facilities are proposed in existing industrial and Draft.
manufacturing areas, an assessment of the future
residents' risk of exposure to hazardous materials
should be completed. Residential development
should not be allowed if such hazardous conditions
cannot be mitigated to an acceptable level of risk.
14
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-50: Endorse County Hazardous Waste
Management Plan
The City shall continue its endorsement of the Delete. Same as Administrative
County Hazardous Waste Management Plan, Draft.
subject to the following principles:
- Locally adopted criteria for siting of
hazardous waste management treatment,
disposal or transportation facilities shall
take precedence over such criteria in the
County plan when City-adopted criteria
are more stringent.
- The City will avoid duplication of effort to
implement hazardous waste management
programs. Priority will be given to
cooperative funding support of
implementation programs through the
County Hazardous Waste Management
Plan.
Policy 6-51: Alternative Products and Recycling
Encourage residential, commercial and industrial Modify. (Policy 6-30) Same as Administrative
contributors to the hazardous waste stream to use Draft.
non-hazardous alternative products and processes
and recycle materials in order to retard growth of the
waste stream and thus reduce demand for treatment
capacity.
15
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6-52: Household Hazardous Wastes
Continue to work with the County, other cities and Keep. Slightly modify. Same as Administrative
interested groups to develop a program for the (policy 6-31) Draft.
proper management and disposal of household
hazardous wastes that is effective and convenient for
residents.
Policy 6- 53: CommerciaJfIndustrial Recycling
Continue to expand commercial and industrial Keep. Move to Same as Administrative
recycling programs to meet AB939 waste stream Environmental Resources Draft.
reduction goals. Element. (Policy 5-38)
Policy 6- 54: Residential Recycling
Continue to streauùine the residential curbside Keep. (Policy 5-39) Same as Administrative
recycling program in the next decade. All city-wide Draft. Modify strategies.
residential zoning districts should be included in the
curbside recycling program.
Policy 6- 55: On-site Garbage Area Dedication
Modify existing on-site waste facility requirements Keep. (Policy 5-40) Same as Administrative
to all multi-family residential, commercial and Draft.
industrial land uses to have 50% of their garbage
area dedicated to recycling and 50% dedicated to
solid waste.
16
POLICY (Summary) Administrative Draft Task Force Draft
General Plan
Policy 6- 56: Public Education
Continue public education regarding the reduction Keep. (Policy 5-41) Same as Administrative
of solid waste disposal and recycling. Draft.
Policy 6- 57: City Staff Recycling
Continue to encourage City staff to recycle at all City Keep. (Policy 5-42) Same as Administrative
facilities. Draft. Modify strategies.
Policy 6- 58: Impacts-Sunnyvale Treatment
Consider the impacts on the Sunnyvale sanitary Keep. (Policy 5-46) Same as Administrative
sewer system if significant industrial uses are Draft.
proposed in the South Stevens Creek Boulevard area.
Policy 6-59: Vallco Parkway
Recognize that new high discharge users in the Keep. (Policy 5-47) Same as Administrative
Valko area and the Stevens Creek Boulevard and Draft.
Blaney A venue area will require private developer
paid upgrading of tributary lines.
G: \ Planning \ GenPlan \ Health & Safety Matrix 3.doc
17
General Plan (GP) Process
Issue Alternatives
Public Hearing
Comments
Environmental Impact
Report
COMMUN
HOUSING P
d
b
ITY FORM AND resente Septem er 10, 2003
QUESTION VOTE VOTE VOTE COMMENT
YES NO AB-
STAIN
Should increased emphasis be 14 34
placed on pedestrians and
bicyclists in the draft General Plan
and if so how? Consider reducing
number of through traffic lanes by
converting to parking lanes,
sidewalks or medians (also relates
to other streets besides Stevens
Creek Boulevard.).
Should the development 8 35
allocation (amount of commercial,
office, hotel and residential
development) slightly decrease
the potential commercial and
office development and increase
residential potential?
Should the jobs/housing balance 17 26
be improved?
Should the Crossroads area be a 18 25
pedestrian-oriented shopping
district with mixed use along
Stevens Creek Boulevard,
between De Anza Boulevard and
Stelling Road?
Should the Valko Park South area 20 23
be a mixed-use commercial area
with regional commercial, office
and entertainment center with
supporting higher density
residential development?
Should the heights be the same as 25 12 Conflicting
the existing General Plan, except information on Table 8
with the proposed changes of 30 vote. This shows it
feet adjacent to residential uses, voting yes based on
and gateway areas instead of their report; another
landmark buildings (60+ feet) report shows it voting
no.
2
QUESTION VOTE VOTE VOTE COMMENT
YES NO AB-
STAIN
Should developers be required to 31 12 "
build smaller more affordable
units in order to provide a range
of housing types?
Should the city continue to 27 16 "
encourage the development of
affordable housing?
G:plannmg/ genpIan/task force/ community form vote
COMMUNITY FORMfHOUSING Presented September 10, 2003
QUESTIONS PREPARED BY COMMUNITY FORMfHOUSING WRITERS
(Voting results provided bv Task Force member)
QUESTION VOTE VOTE VOTE COMMENT
YES NO AB-
STAIN
SHARE THE ROAD QUESTIONS
REGARDING EMPHASIS ON
PEDESTRIANS AND
BICYCLISTS
Should street width and number 6 20
of lanes be reduced at the expense
of lowering the Level of Service
(LOS) of the street or
intersections? (This refers to
Stelling, Prospect, rainbow,
Bollinger, Homestead, Stevens
Creek Blvd, De Anza Blvd, and
residential streets.)
Should the general plan require 9 19 1
evaluating options for traffic
calming on Stevens Creek
Boulevard?
Should street widths be reduced 15 11 Table 8: What is
as a general objective to improve "improve"?
community character? Neighbors should
decide, not city.
DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION:
Residential units: Should the 9 22 If not, how many?
general plan allow for 4615 new 1000, 1500, 3615
units? Where? Not Vallco
N&S
Hotel rooms: Should the general 12 17 1 If not, how many? 400
plan allow for 1167 new rooms?
Office/Industrial: Should the 12 19 If not, how many?
general plan allow for 994,693 1.IM
additional square feet? Where? As in existing
GP
Commercial/Retail: Should the 19 12 If not, how many?
general plan allow for 856,710 1.IM
additional square feet? Where? As in existing
GP
2
QUESTION VOTE VOTE VOTE COMMENT
YES NO AB-
STAIN
JOBS/HOUSING BALANCE
Should housing be added if the 5 24 1
resultant student population
cannot attend Cupertino schools?
Should housing be added if they 8 21
cannot attend their neighborhood
schools?
Should the developers for all 3 26
major new or renovated office or
industrial developments be
required to include housing at a
ratio of two dwelling units per
1000 square feet of net new
buildine: area?
Should the jobs/housing 0 24 Table 3: Biased
imbalance be improved at the question
expense of economic health in
Cupertino? (i.e. considering the
cost of providing services to new
development; using land for
housing rather than for retail that
could provide more local stores
and services and generate sales
tax revenue)
Should major developments be 8 16 Table 3: Biased
allowed that would increase the question
jobs/housing imbalance,
requiring more housing to be
added?
Should the general plan require a 17 12 If so, how often:
periodic review of the data used 3-5 years
to establish ABAG housing 2-5 years
requirements, to confirm the
accuracy of the determinations,
and to make sure the
requirements reflect changes in
the jobs/housing balance caused
bv chane:ine: economic conditions?
3
QUESTION VOTE VOTE VOTE COMMENT
YES NO AB-
STAIN
CROSSROADS AREA
Should residential uses be 11 18
introduced into the Crossroads
area?
If so, should the housing density 10 19
in hat area and elsewhere along
Stevens Creek Blvd. all be at 35
dwelling units per acre?
Should buildings in the 16 13
Crossroads area exceed 30 feet
plate height (where the roof pitch
begins) and 36 feet total height?
BUILDING HElGHfS
Should heights be allowed at 60 6 24
feet for apartments/ condos near
Stelling and Homestead?
Should height exceptions be 10 21
allowed in the "Heart of the City"
area?
Should heights in excess of 60 feet 9 21 If so, how high? It
be allowed anywhere in the city? depends. 35'
Where? Per GP in City
Ctr&Vallco
Should 45 foot heights be allowed 9 20 1
along Prospect, Rainbow, Stelling
and the othes listed in item one
and outline in dark blue on the
height map?
OTHER HOUSING DENSITY
ISSUES
Should housing be developed on 6 24 1
Homestead near Stelling at 50
dwelling units per acre?
Should housing be developed in 9 17 For N De Anza
the North De Anza and Bubb Rd. 4 2 For Bubb
areas at 35 dwelling units per
acre?
4
QUESTION VOTE VOTE VOTE COMMENT
YES NO AB-
STAIN
Should the City Center area be 13 19 Define enhanced.
enhanced as a large scale high What is high density?
density mixed use district?
Should mixed use developments 14 18
be encouraged throughout the city
or mainlv in the urban centers?
Should higher density housing 11 18 1
and mixed use projects be
encouraged along our main
streets (Stelling, Prospect,
Homestead, see list in the first
question)?
DESIGN REVIEW
Should a resident's Architectural 19 13
and Site Review Committee be
reestablished in addition to the
design review subcommittee of
the Planning Commission to get
input from residents on new city
projects, and to make the
development process more public
before building designs are finally
approved?
VIEW ISSUES
Should the general plan include 21 10
incentives for developers who
protect views of the hillsides for
the residents who don't live in the
hills to eniov?
pARKS
Should the general plan 25 7
encourage pocket parks by
reducing the 3.5 acre park
minimum size?
5
QUESTION VOTE VOTE VOTE COMMENT
YES NO AB-
STAIN
ECONOMIC ISSUES
Should the general plan seek to 18 7
have the city annex the Hanson
qUarry for the utility tax revenue?
Should the general plan designate 17 8
certain zones to be strictly
commercial/retail to maximize
sales tax revenues? (Ex. North and
South Valko area; the Oaks area)
G:plaruUng/ genplan/ task force/ commwùty form vote from writers 9-10-3
COMMUNITY FORM AND HOUSING P
dS
b
resente eptem er 24, 2003
QUESTION VOTE VOTE VOTE COMMENT
YES NO AB-
STAIN
Consider pocket parks in new and 35 10
renovated commercial and in new
residential developments for
respite and gathering places
(Policy 2-72).
View Preservation: Devise and 34 10
implement a policy to encourage
developers to limit building
heights in order to preserve
hillside views throughout the city.
(Policv -44, Strategy 3)
Since the quality of Cupertino 43 1 1
schools (element and high school)
is a primary asset of the city, care
shall be taken to ensure that any
new housing will not adversely
impact these systems. (Policy 2-19,
Strate!!\' 2)
Approve the development chart 34 4 3 more yes with
in Policy 2-20. some residential in
Valko South and 2
more yes if more
retail
Approve building housing 13 11
density changes by area, using the
area list in Implementation
Program 1 attached.
After voting on densities by area, Option neither
vote on Option 1 or Option 2. 1-13 -17
Option
2-14
Developers who develop housing 28 10 1
of 10 units and above must
provide 15% below market rate
units based on the actual number
of new units built, not based on
the net number of new units
provided.
2
QUESTION VOTE VOTE VOTE COMMENT
YES NO AB-
STAIN
Approve the height changes: no 21 11 1
60 foot heights; maximum 45 feet
at City Center; maximum 35 feet
Homestead/Stelling; maximum
35 feet Valko Park South;
maximum 30 feet elsewhere.
3
DELETE FROM THE GENERAL
PLAN THE FOLLOWING
SENTENCES, AS THEY
UNDERMINE ALL THE
DENSITIES SPECIFIED IN THE
GENERAL PLAN (9 THROUGH
14):
QUESTION VOTE VOTE VOTE COMMENT
YES NO AB-
STAIN
Development allocations for the 36 4
planning area shall not be
exceeded unless allocations are
transferred from another area.
(There are always "underutilized
properties")
Floor area ratios may be exceeded 37 8
during the development review
process if mixed use or other
community amenities are
provided (would need limits and
quid pro quo specific
requirements).
Based on the fact that the city 40 5
during the past decade has added
an average of 200 units per year to
the housing stock, this 5 year goal
(of 465 units per year) will need to
be aggressively pursued between
2001-2006. (Sec. A Adequate sites
for ABAG Estimated New
Construction need)
Allow residential developments to 36 9
exceed planned density
maximums if they meet a special
social goal (Implementation
Program 18). Any development
could meet some social goal.
4
QUESTION VOTE VOTE VOTE COMMENT
YES NO AB-
STAIN
The city will develop and adopt a 40 4
program that includes the
following guidelines: When a
proposed development or
redevelopment of a site would
cause a loss of multi-family rental
housing, the City will grant
approval only if at least two of the
following three circumstances
exist:
The project will produce at least a
100% increase in the number of units
currently on the site.
(Cut only italicized text requiring
double the density)
Implementation Program 26
Require that major new office or 36 9
industrial development, or
redevelopment, including
housing at two dwelling units for
every 1000 square feet of new
office/ industrial building area
(Policy 2-19, Strategy 2)
G:planning/genplan/task force/community form vote 9-24
G:p1anrring/ genplan/ task force/ circulation votes 8-27
st 27, 2003
COMMENT
49
42
6
43
34 16
20 29 1
4 no's would be yes if
reference to E+ is
deleted.
38 11 1 2 people who voted
yes don't support
speed humps
44 5 1
SUSTAINABILITY (GREEN BUILDINGS, OPEN SPACE, PARKS AND
TRAILS) Presented August 27, 2003
QUESTION VOTE VOTE VOTE COMMENT
YFS NO AB-
STAIN
Should the principles of 49 1 (on
sustainability be incorporated into Policy
Cupertino's planning and 5-2)
development system (Policy 5-1)
. Encourage the conservation
and efficient use of electrical
power and natural gas resources.
(Policy 5-2)
. Encourage the design and
construction of energy and
resource conserving/ efficient
buildings (Green Building Design)
(Policy 5-3)
Should Cupertino dedicate or 41 7 1 7 yes votes are based
acquire trail linkages to connect on amending policy to
areas and provide a more say
walkable community? (Policy 2- "Where appropriate"
68)
Should Blackberry Farm be reused 34 15
as a community park? (Policy 2-
64, Policy 2-76)
Should Cupertino acquire school 44 5
properties and preserve school
playing fields? (Policy 2-75,
Policy 2-78)
Should neighborhood parks in 46 3
neighborhoods F-l, K and M be
acquired or dedicated? (Table 2-
C)
G:pIanIÚng/ genpIan/task force/ sustainability vote S-27
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES Presented September 17, 2003
QUESTION VOTE VOTE VOTE COMMENT
YES NO AB-
STAIN
Establish a Task 30 10 Votes missing from one
Force/Commission to further table
evaluate technologies, cost of (AIl questions)
ownership, implementation and
annual plan.
Educate the public how's, why's 38 1
and how to become more
"sustainable."
Water-wise demonstration 29 9 1
gardens
Reduced pesticides in watershed 38 2
Increased recycling 39
Some "encourage" and "should" 11 22 1
have been changed to "will" and
"require" for new construction
and significant remodel.
G:planning/ genplan/ task force/ environmental resources vote
'"
HEALTH AND SAFETY Pr
t d S t
b 17 2003
esen e eplem er ,
QUESTION VOTE VOTE VOTE COMMENT
YES NO AB-
STAIN
Should Acceptable Levels of Risk 11 29
as shown in Table 6-C page 6-9 be
lowered for Groups 6 and 7?
Community gates, speed bumps 22 17 1
and humps can hinder the
response time of emergency
vehicles. Should the city avoid
such traffic calming devices in the
interest of public safety?
Should the city commit more 25 8 5
resources for Emergency Training
programs like CERT?
Should the city place a high 31 8 1
priority in developing an
Emergency Response Plan to a
Stevens Creek Reservoir Dam
failure?
G:planning/ genplan/task force/health and safety vote 9-17-03
COMMUNITY FORM AND HOUSING FINAL VOTES
October 8, 2003
Task Force members began a discussion on specific changes in this section, but
did not finish them. Instead, a vote was taken on the document as a whole, with
no further changes than those shown in the attached document. Even so, votes
on the few changes discussed are shown below.
There are two development allocation options because the Task Force did not
reach a consensus on one or the other. (See page 10.)
CHANGE PROPOSED CHANGE VOTE
Overall question How many people generally Yes 35
concur with the element No 6
Page 2 Strikes Policy 2-3 (CrossroadS) Yes 7
Page 7 Support Option 1 17
Support Option 2 9
Neither 14
Either 5
Page 11 Support 35 units per gross acre 5
on Stevens Creek Boulevard
Support 25 units per gross acre 21
on Stevens Creek Boulevard
Support as is 13
planning/ genplan/task force/community form and housing votes
CIRCULATION FINAL VOTES
October 15, 2003
The changes below represent some of the changes in the Circulation element.
There are other changes in the element that were voted on as part of the whole
document.
CHANGE PROPOSED CHANGE VOTE
Page 4-2 Remove traffic calming bullet. Yes 18
No 0
Page 4-6 Strategy 2. Change wording to Yes 20
"Provide space on appropriate No 0
streets for bus turnouts, or safe
and accessible bike lanes or
pedestrian paths."
Page 4-6 Strategy 2. Delete reference to Yes 8
developing a quarter-mile grid No 1
of safe, walkable sidewalks, etc.
Page 4-6 Strategy 2. Change wording to Yes 15
"Consider developing: a quarter- No 0
mile grid of safe, walkable
sidewalks, etc.
Page 4-7 Strategy 5. Strike first two Yes 18
sentences. No 0
Strike Stevens Creek Blvd';
DeAnza.
Page 4-9 Add Strategy 7: Study the Yes 19
possibility of providing shuttle No 1
service.
Page 4-9 Strategy 5. Delete traffic signal Yes 11
preemption for buses. No 10
Page 4-12 Drop Policy 4-6 and Strategies 1 Yes 14
and 2 No 7
Page 4-15 Strategy 1. Add "and based on (vote not
approval of 60% of the residents recorded)
on the street."
Page 4-15 Strategy 3. Change wording to Yes 17
"Develop traffic management No 0
plans for local residential streets
affected by unacceptable levels
of through traffic."
Add a policy Enhance the synchronization of Yes 24
traffic signals on major streets. No 0
Overall question How many people generally Yes 21
concur with this element and the No 2
changes?
G:planning/ genplan/ task force/ circulation votes
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES FINAL VOTES
October 15, 2003
The changes below represent some of the changes in the Environmental
Resources element. There are other changes in the element that were voted on as
hi
part of the woe document.
CHANGE PROPOSED CHANGE VOTE
Overall question How many people generally Yes 16
concur with the element No 2
With changes Yes 22
No 0
Page 5-5 Change "Require the inclusion Yes 16
of additional shade trees and No 5
landscaping for energy
efficiency" to "Encoural!:e..."
Page 5-6 Delete "Require residents and Yes 7
businesses that are remodeling No 18
to review and sign as
acknowledgement that they
have reviewed the "Sustainable
Building Practices" guide prior
to permits beinl!: issued."
Page 5-6 Change "Require either passive Yes 20
solar heating and or dark plaster No 2
interior with a cover for Delete 2
swimming pools..." to
"Encourage..."
Page 5-11 Mention both quarries, not just Yes 21
Hanson. No 1
Page 5-13 Change "Require drought Yes 16
tolerant native...." to No 6
"Encoura¡1;e..."
Page 5-20 Remove all "etc: s" Yes 19
No 0
Page 5-23 Change "Include water-wise Yes 14
demonstration gardens in each No 7
park. ..." to "some parks where
feasible..."
Page 5-24 Change "Require water-efficient Yes 15
landscaping plans as part of the No 9
development review process" to
"Encoura¡1;e..."
G:planning/ genplan/ task force/ environmental resources votes
HEALTH AND SAFETY FINAL VOTES
October 15, 2003
The changes below represent some of the changes in the Health and Safety
element. There are other changes in the element that were voted on as part of the
whole document.
CHANGE PROPOSED CHANGE VOTE
Overall question How many people generally Yes 10
concur with the element No 4
With changes Yes 26
No 0
Pa!1:e 6-7 StrateI1:\' 2: Spell out acronvrns No vote taken
Page 6-7 Strategy 4: Leave in reference to Yes 19
50% increase. No 6
Bring back original language. Yes 12
No 6
Page 6-9 Remove Table 6-C Yes 5
No 15
Page 6-20 Policy 6-12A: leave in last Yes 16
sentence. No 1
planning/ genpJan/task force/health and safety votes
COMMENTS
October 15, 2003
al
T kF
b
d
db I
as orce mem ers ma e gener comments as note eow.
TASK FORCE COMMENT OTHERS IN
MEMBER AGREEMENT
Joanne Tong The Community Form and Housing 11
section references the Crossroads. There
is community concern about this; why is
it still in the plan?
[Answer: the City Council left the
reference in for the Task Force to
discuss.]
Minority report: who is signing the
report and do they live in the city?
People who speak at the meeting should
identify themselves as a resident or non-
resident.
[Answer: Signatures will be provided
with the minority report. Resident/ non-
resident information is currently
available.]
Dennis Whittaker Not able to speak previouslv.
Land use flexibility - retain our "jewels." 15
Honor development commitments. No, 13
honor citizens/voters.
School impacts - Monta Vista will be 18
shut down.
Frannie Edwards- Reviewed the recommendations for
Winslow changes to the Health and Safety
element. E.g., the table has no attribution,
and city has no control over the facilities
listed; the 50% requirement is typical;
smoke detectors - is a safety issue; shake
roof - don't repeat Santana Row; delete
Strategy 3 under policy 6-35 - there is an
existing national plan.
Kathy Stakey What about school impact studies?
[Answer: school impacts will be
analyzed in the Environmental Impact
Report]
Erve Conens More people are concerned about these
issues than those who spoke.
(votes were then taken to show support
of comments)
G:planning/ genplan/task force/ comments 10-15-03
Community Form and Housing
Summary of Task Force Input
Introduction: Two thirds of the task force members voting on the clarification questions on "City Form
and Housing" wanted affordable housing, but not 35 units to the acre, and not 45 and 60 foot heights.
Most felt the jobs/housing balance had swung in the other direction, and that we didn't need 4600 new
homes in the General Plan. Also, most preferred the Crossroads area to be a significant retail area,
without mixed uses there. As to whether to limit the Vallco area to retail uses for economic stability, a
significant minority was in favor of that option, so two approaches to housing allocations are presented.
Consensus Items (66 2/3 to 100%) These will not be voted on again tonight.
Street Width
Do not reduce street width, on Stevens Creek Blvd, De Anza Blvd, Stelling, Prospect,
other minor arterials, neighborhood streets.
Do not add more on street parking areas to Stevens Creek Blvd.
Commercial growth (retail/restaurants, etc)
Do not reduce the amount of commercial development potential in the General Plan.
(Keep the existing General Plan commercial allocation of 4,431,000, not 4,174,136)
Encourage commercial development.
Designate certain areas of the city expressly for commercial development.
Crossroads area to be all commercial with no housing.
Residential Growth
Do not increase the amount of housing in the general plan Gust go from the
20,032 units built in 2000 to 22,369 as set out in the existing General Plan).
Mfordable Housing
Encourage developers to build smaller homes for better affordability.
Encourage a mix of housing types and densities to provide lower cost units.
Housing Densities
Do not build housing at 35 units to the acre in the following areas:
(N. De Anza Blvd, Vallco North, Vallco South, Crossroads, Bubb Road)
Do not build housing at 50 units per acre at Villa Serra on Homestead
Do not build housing at 35 units per acre on Stevens Creek except at City Center
Do not add more high density housing to City Center.
Building Heights
Do not build at 60 ft or 60+ feet.
Limit areas with 45 foot heights.
Do not build housing at 45 foot heights.
Most housing to be less than 30 feet in height.
Do not "urbanize" Cupertino; maintain the suburban character.
Jobs/Housing Balance
The balance has shifted. Many are out of work. Many have left the area. People have moved to the
area now from Morgan Hill and Fremont because prices and rents are lower than in the past.
Economic Development
Economic Development for fiscal stability should be a City priority.
Please vote on the following:
Add to the general plan: (1 to 3)
1. Consider poclæt parks in new and renovated comnærcial and in new residential developnænts for
respite and gathaing places. (Policy 2-72)
~Yes 1Q...No
2. View Preservation
Devise and implenænt a policy to encourage developers to limit building heights in order to preserve
hillside views throughout the city. (Policy 2-44, Strategy 3)
~ Yes 1Q... No
3. Since the quality of Cupertino schools (elenæntary and high school) is a primary asset of the city, care
shall be talæn to ensure that any new housing will not adversely impact these systems. (Policy 2-19,
Strategy 2)
~ Yes LNo LAbstain
4. Approve the development chart in Policy 2-20
34 _Yes L No
5. Approve building housing density changes by area, using the area list in Implementation
Program 1 attached.
~ Yes !LNo
6. After voting on densities by area, vote on Option 1 or Option 2.
~ Option 1 11- Option 2 1L Neither
7. Developers who develop housing of 10 units and above must provide 15% below market rate
units based on the actual number of new units built, not based on the net number of new
units provided.
~ Yes 1Q...No LAbstain
8. Approve the height changes. No 60 foot heights; maximum 45 feet at City Center; maximum
35 feet Homestead/Stelling; maximum 35 feet Valko Park South; maximum 30 feet elsewhere.
21 Yes !LNo LAbstain
~ from the General Plan the following sentences, as they undermine all the densities
specified in the General Plan: (9 through 14)
9. Developnænt allocations for the planning area shall not be exceeded unless allocations are
transferred from another area. (there are always "underuti1ized properties")
~ Yes LNo
10. Floor area ratios l1UIy be exceeded during the development review process if mixed use or other
community anænities are provided. (would need limits and quid pro quo specific requirements)
~ Yes §.....No
11. Based on the fact thnt the city during the past decade hns added an average of200 units per year to
the housing stock, this 5-year goal (of 465 units per year) will need to be aggressively pursued
between 2001-2006. (Sec. A Adequate sites for ABAG Estimated New Construction need)
!Q.. Yes L No
12. Allow residential developments to exceed planned density maximums if they meet a special social
Goal. .. (Implementation Program 18) Any development could meet some social goal.
~ Yes LNo
13. The City will develop and adopt a program that includes the following guidelines: When
a proposed development or redevelopment of a site would cause a loss of multi-family
rental housing, the City will grant approval only if at least two of the following three
circumstances exist:
The project will produce at least a 100% increase in the number of units currently
on the site. (cut only italicized text requiring double the density) Implementation
Program 26
~ Yes LNo
14. Require thnt major new office or industrial development, or redevelopment, include housing at
two dwelling units for every 1000 square fret of new office/industrial building area. (Policy 2-19,
Strategy 2)
~ Yes LNo
Implementation 1: Housine: Units by plannine: district
Add about 2340 new residential units as specified in the existing general plan versus 4615 new
units citywide in the draft.
Option 1 (includes some housing at Valko, but none in the Crossroads area)
Area # Units Densitv (# units/acre) # of acres
Monta Vista 142 up to 12 11.8
Vallco Park South 125 up to 25 5 (of20)
Heart oftbe City 443 up to 25 17.7
Homestead Road 493 up to 35 14.1
City Center 494 up to 35 14.1
North De Anza 215 up to 25 8.6
Vallco Park North 228 up to 25 8.7
Bubb Road 81 up to 20 4.1
Undesignated IlL up to 20 6.5
Total 2337
Option 2 (includes no housing at Valko, and no housing in the Crossroads area)
Area # Units Densitv (# units/acre) # of acres
Monta Vista 142 up to 12 11.8
Val1co Park South 0 0 0 (of20)
Heart of the City 262 up to 15 17.7
Homestead Road 316 up to 22 14.1
City Center 495 up to 35 14.1
North De Anza 300 up to 35 8.6
Val1co Park North 0 0 0 (of 8.7)
Bubb Road 81 up to 20 4.1
Undesignated 455 ?
Total 2315
Cupertino General Plan Task Force
Table Leader Reports
July 23, 2003
Table I
. Do we really need to meet the ABAG housing numbers? What is the penalty if
we don't?
. Heights - will taller buildings complement the surrounding areas? The look of
Cupertino is small, low level.
. Commercial development -look at existing companies. Why reduce the
commercial development potential, rather than try to attract? Don't diminish
Stevens Creek Boulevard - where would traffic go?
. Senior housing - how are we going to encourage it? Need assisted and affordable
assisted.
Table 2
. Table discussed the development allocation, street framing, mixed use.
. Requests information on what has been built and approved between 2000 and
2003.
. Need a clearer path and more time to discuss. Suggests referencing topics to draft
General Plan to know what to look for in General Plan.
Table 3
. Why is there so much potential for hotel rooms(l,OOO)?
. Why allow new commercial development if existing buildings are under-utilized?
The answer may be that older buildings need to be replaced.
. Jobs/housing balance. Cupertino ranks in the middle of other cities. How well
are we doing with low-income housing? We need to retain our residential
character. Why look at either/or? We should retain our residential character and
still help with low-income housing.
Table 4
. Looked at allocations and what they would do differently from the draft General
Plan. E.g., hotels - do we need more? Office - why more if we have high
vacancies now?
. Does the City try to lure in new properties?
. Residential needs to be increased, but there are concerns about impacts on
education.
Table 5
. How do we get more revenue? Through sales tax.
. Likes the Heart of the City plan. Youth needs a place to go. Like to see more
commercial growth in the middle of Cupertino, not just Vallco and the Oaks.
. Bring down heights.
. Crossroads - atmosphere needs to be more inviting.
. Is there a gain or loss for each residential unit?
. Need presentation from Fire Department.
. Need more detailed answers.
. Does the population increase benefit existing residents?
Table 6
. The General Plan goals are so general that it's hard to have disagreement. Goals
are not measurable objectives, which are needed.
. Focused on Goals D and E, jobs/housing balance. Are we out of balance - what
is the measure? Affordable housing is good, but large scale and density and
encroachment on commercial may not be good.
Table 7
Interested in increasing commercial/mixed use, including Bubb Road. Office
could be part of mixed use.
. Hotel rooms - we have enough.
. Residential- be sure there is a fiscal balance.
. Jobs/housing balance is OK as is.
. 15% BMR requirement is good.
. Public safety is important. "Security by Design."
Table 8
. Discussed where each person was coming from.
. Discussed impressions of Cupertino.
. Mixed use - not convinced they want to support it.
. Crossroads/streetscape - too late, already too slow. What about using side
streets?
. Teenagers, families need a place to hang out. Coffee shops don't have areas to
relax and interact.
. Jobs/housing balance - high density not desirable - need more infonnation.
. Written answers to questions not sufficient.
. Monta Vista - why is mixed use working?
. Do we have a say about the future of Vall co?
. Like to see less commercial area and residential units.
G:planning/genplan/task force 7-23-03 table leader reports
Cupertino General Plan Task Force
Table Leader Reports
August 6, 2003
Table 1
. Discussed what they can recommend and not recommend, e.g., heights.
. Need fiscal and school numbers.
. Want to ask questions of speakers after they speak.
. What about serving the community currently living in Cupertino? We allow
development at what cost to the people who already live here. People don't
live here for jobs. Questions jobs/housing ratio; on what basis should we
recommend more housing?
. The Task Force time frame is not long enough.
. More detail is needed on the answers to questions.
Table 2
. Question for the sheriff for next week: What are the sheriff costs for
commercial, office,industrial, hotel and residential and for low income
developments.
. We want more trees.
. Commercial development: hard to tell if hotel potential will be needed. If
Valko doesn't build out, is anyone else going to use the commercial square
footage? Existing General Plan for housing is OK.
. Where is extra land [for new development] coming from?
Table 3
. Is there any way to encourage more attractive buildings?
Need to be concerned about square footage, not just density.
. General Plan review - is every 10 years enough? How about every 5 years?
. Height: need more restrictive rules, concerned about exceptions.
. Discussed the possibility of four lanes on Stevens Creek Boulevard.
Table 4
. Talked about how to beautify the City, bring all the different areas together.
. Heights: Cypress Hotel is too high. Are we following the plan?
. Preserve residential neighborhoods.
Table 5
. Will we share the Task Force questions with the City Council at their study
sessions?
. Why are we having the Task Force and still developing new projects?
. Underground parking garages.
. Is the city fiscally sound - would like to have fiscal documents.
. What are the criteria for low income housing?
. Can we prohibit exceptions?
. Need more discussion time.
Table 6
. Community Form: What do we want our city to be - urban or suburban"?
This is a useful discussion point.
. Revenue: evaluate community form for the impact on the revenue stream.
. Very little land is left; therefore, development will have a significant impact.
. Development is appropriate at major freeway exits, e.g., Valko. These land
resources are very precious; they should not be residential and should be
commercial/ office. Valko has the opportunity for successful commercial
and can support industry.
. Heart of the City and Homestead; phased, mixed-use is appropriate. Test
mixed-use.
. Heights: 46' seems reasonable.
Table 7
. Money (fiscal impact) is number one concern. Presenters need to give
specific information on fiscal impacts.
. Commercial zone is not adequately differentiated.
. Residential uses can't be near certain kinds of development.
. Need more time to reach consensus.
. Task Force needs to be informed about the City Council study sessions.
. Schools: other areas are being funded by developments around them.
. Cupertino needs to offer things to make Cupertino the city of choice.
. Want to make specific recommendations on the General Plan.
Table 8
. Visionary stage hasn't emerged; details have inhibited the group.
Discussion time is too short.
. Similar views as Table 6.
. Jobs/housing balance: group doesn't think there is an imbalance.
. Sales and use tax is fragile. Need more emphasis on steady, constant income.
. Does the housing allocation plan max out the city in the future?
. Need to be advised of other decisions being made.
G:planning/ genplan/task force/8-6-03 table leader reports
2
Table Group Comments by Discussion Points
Community Forum and Housing - 08/13/03
(number in parenthesis is table number)
1.
Develovment Allocation:
. What about serving the community currently living in Cupertino?
We allow development at what cost to the people who already live
here. People don't live here for jobs. (1)
. Community Form: What do we want our city to be - urban or
suburban? This is a useful discussion point. (6)
. Very little land is left; therefore, development will have a
significant impact. (6)
2.
Commercial:
. Commercial development -look at existing companies. Why
reduce the commercial development potential, rather than try to
attract? Don't diminish Stevens Creek Boulevard - where would
traffic go? (1)
. Why allow new commercial development if existing buildings are
under-utilized? The answer may be that older buildings need to be
replaced. (3)
. Likes the Heart of the City plan. Youth needs a place to go. Like to
see more commercial growth in the middle of Cupertino, not just
Valko and the Oaks. (5)
. Interested in increasing commercial/mixed-use, including Bubb
Road. Office could be part of mixed use. (7)
. Like to see less commercial area and residential units. (8)
. Development is appropriate at major freeway exits, e.g., Valko.
These land resources are very precious; they should not be
residential and should be commercial/ office. Valko has the
opportunity for successful commercial and can support industry.
(6)
3.
4.
. Commercial zone is not adequately differentiated. (7)
Office:
. Office - why more if we have high vacancies now? (4)
Hotel:
. Looked at allocations and what they would do differently form the
draft General Plan. E.g., Hotels, do we need more? (4)
. Hotel rooms - we have enough. (7)
. Commercial development: hard to tell if hotel potential will be
needed. (2)
5.
Residential:
. Like to see less commercial area and residential units. (8)
. Preserve residential neighborhoods. (4)
6.
T obs/Housing:
. Do we really need to meet the ABAG housing numbers? What is
the penalty if we don't? (1)
. Senior housing - how are we going to encourage it? Need assisted
and affordable assisted. (1)
. Jobs/housing balance. Cupertino ranks in the middle of other
cities. How well are we doing with low-income housing? We need
to retain our residential character. Why look at either/ or? We
should retain our residential character and still help with low-
income housing. (3)
. Residential needs to be increased, but there are concerns about
impacts on education. (4)
. Focused on Goals D and E, jobs/housing balance. Are we out of
balance - what is the measure? Affordable housing is good, but
large scale and density and encroachment on commercial may not
be good. (6)
. Jobs/housing balance is OK as is. (7)
8.
9.
10.
. 15% BMR requirement is good. (7)
. Mixed-use - not convinced they want to support it. (8)
. Jobs/housing balance - high-density not desirable - need more
information. (8)
. Existing General Plan for housing is OK. (2)
. Heart if the City and Homestead; phased, mixed-use is appropriate.
Test mixed use. (6)
. Residential uses can't be near certain kinds of development. (7)
. Jobs/housing balance: group doesn't think there is an imbalance.
(8)
. Questions jobs/housing ratio; on what basis should we recommend
more housing? (1)
7.
Location:
Hei~hts:
. Heights - will taller buildings complement the surrounding areas?
The look of Cupertino is small, low level. (1)
. Bring down heights. (5)
. Height: need more restrictive rules, concerned about expectations.
(3)
. Heights: Cypress Hotel is too high. Are we following the plan? (4)
. Heights: 46' seems reasonable.
Crossroads/street framing:
. Crossroads/ streetscape - too late, already too slow. What about
using side streets? (8)
Buildin~ Desi~n:
. Crossroads - atmosphere needs to be more inviting. (5)
11.
12.
13.
14.
. Is there any way to encourage more attractive buildings? Need to
be concerned about square footage, not just density. (3)
. Talked about how to beautify the City, bring all the different areas
together. (4)
Fiscal:
. How do we get more revenue? Through sales tax. (5)
. Residential - be sure there is a fiscal balance. (7)
.
Revenue: evaluate community form for the impact on the revenue
stream. (6)
. Money (fiscal impact) is number one concern. Presenters need to
give specific information on fiscal impacts. (7)
. Sales and use tax is fragile. Need more emphasis on steady,
constant income. (8)
Schools:
. Schools: other areas are being funded by developments around
them. (7)
Public Safety:
. Public safety is important. "Safety by Design." (7)
Other:
. Teenagers, families need a place to hang out. Coffee shops don't
have areas to relax and interact. (8)
G: \ Planning \ GenPlan \ Task Force \ Table Group CommEnts by Discussion Points. doc
Cupertino General Plan Task Force
Table Leader Reports
Share the Road
August 13, 2003
Table 1
. Time should be extended to 9:15. Number of meetings should not be
extended, or if so, for a short period. Focus on small number of topics.
. Explore other cities' Best Practices.
. Is the Segway legal in Cupertino?
. Having a tram or minibus was mentioned.
. Bus service is inadequate; people aren't going to wait long for a bus.
. Is there a budget proposal to support pedestrians and bicycles like there is for
cars?
. School impact - how can we rectify it? Is the city working with the schools?
. How do other cities deal with pedestrian and bike movements?
. Traffic congestion will not be helped by improving the jobs/housing balance;
it will get worse.
. Level of Service, page 4-22, shows a deterioration, so this is not a good
suggestion.
. Four-way stops: people don't stop. Maybe cars could be let out by sensors.
. Better parking enforcement is needed for festivals at parks; neighborhoods
are adversely affected.
. Stevens Creek Boulevard should not be narrowed.
Table 2
. Table was split on extending the time. Meetings should not be extended 3
months; four people thought 4 extra meetings were OK; two thought 2 meetings
were OK.
. Each meeting should be specific with conclusions that night, and then move
on. It's been too vague.
. Share the Road: agreed need to work with neighboring jurisdictions on
regional transportation planning.
. Don't agree with going below Level of Service D; LOS should be maintained
at D or better.
. Agree with promoting Safe Routes to Schools.
. Don't agree with narrowing through traffic lanes; traffic lanes are needed.
Delete policy 4-7.
. Policy 4-5, strategy 2 is a problem; don't want the General Plan to circumvent
the rules.
2
Table 3
. Extending the meetings to 9:15 is OK; extending 3 months is too long.
. Need at least one night of focus groups.
. Need more time for interaction among groups.
. Share the Road: need to finish the missing links in the sidewalks.
. ADA is important.
. How about two-way bike lanes on one side, parking on the other?
. Can an administrator from De Anza College come talk to us about improving
communication?
. Work closely with the Valley Transportation Authority. Does city staff attend
VTA meeting and with what results? Can the community be informed?
. Countdown walk signs are a good idea.
. Revisit traffic calming/bumps - are they effective?
. Schools need more drop off points.
Table 4
. Extend meetings to 9:15. Stick to schedule; need time to go in depth.
. When can we bring up other issues not on the discussion points?
. Are bike lanes on all major routes?
. Wheelchair or stroller accessibility is a concern.
. School traffic is a concern.
. Promote Safe Routes to School.
. Need more cameras.
Table 5
. Extend meetings to 9:15. If number of meetings is extended, would need to
change process. Establish focus groups on topics, and people can join based on
their interest. Suggest August 27 meeting and 3 more on topics.
. Each person should read the General Plan before the meeting and come with
questions.
. Generally support Circulation section.
. Need shuttle to serve schools and De Anza College, similar to Palo Alto.
. Rotate Table Leader.
Table 6
. Table group makeup changes week to week.
. Extend time and number of meetings. Want more focus and depth and time
to debate.
. Circulation: work with regional agencies.
. Debated the jobs/housing issue.
. Pedestrians/bikes: want to improve the experience, disagreement as to how.
. Lane reduction: 2/3 or group said no, 1/3 said yes
3
. Split on LOS D or better. The argument for allowing LOS to deteriorate is
that it forces people onto the freeway.
. Promote walkability with longer pedestrian times.
. Need more neighborhood traffic calming - use the right tool in the right
place.
. Need to address the problem of red light runners.
Table 7
. More abatement is needed for school traffic. More busing; rent a VT A bus.
Encourage children to bicycle; make it safer. Have assigned high school parking.
. Jay walking problem -look at design, such as barricades.
. De Anza College: new buildings need mitigation. Was there an EIR?
. Create VTA turnouts.
. Re-evaluate pedestrian crossing signals.
. There is an economic downturn now; traffic could be worse in the future.
. Shrink the Heart of the City from Stelling to Miller.
. Traffic calming - concern that streets parallel to major thoroughfares, such as
Rodriguez, get overflow traffic and may need traffic calming.
Table 8
. Extend meetings to 9:15.
. Suggest using" art gallery" approach - use dots to vote on issues.
. Possibly have a shuttle bus that goes around the city.
. Not sure about narrower roads; parked cars are a safety issue with bicycles.
. Need to manage loading of cars in Cupertino.
G:planning/ genplan/8-13-03 table leader reports
Table Group Comments by Discussion Points
Share the Road - 08/13/03
(number in parenthesis is table number)
1.
Re~onal Transportation Planning (transit):
. Bus service is inadequate; people aren't going to wait long for a
bus. (1)
. Share the Road: agreed need to work with neighboring
jurisdictions on regional transportation planning. (2)
. Work closely with the Valley Transportation Authority. Does city
staff attend VT A meeting and with what results? Can the
community be informed? (3)
. Circulation: work with regional agencies. (6)
. Create VTA turnouts. (7)
2.
Increased emphasis on pedestrians & bicyclists:
. Is there a budget proposal to support pedestrians and bicycles like
there is for cars? (1)
. How do other cities deal with pedestrian and bike movements? (1)
. Stevens Creek Boulevard should not be narrowed. (1)
. Don't agree with narrowing through traffic lanes; traffic lanes are
needed. Delete policy 4-7. (2)
. Lane reduction: 2/3 of group said no, 1/3 said yes. (6)
. Not sure about narrower roads; parked cars are a safety issue with
bicycles. (8)
. Agree with promoting Safe Routes to Schools. (2)
. Share the Road: need to finish the missing links in the sidewalks.
(3)
2
.
ADA is important. (3)
. How about two-way bike lanes on one side, parking on the other?
(3)
. Countdown walk signs are a good idea. (3)
. Wheelchair or stroller accessibility is a concern. (4)
. Promote Safe Routes to School. (4)
. Pedestrians/bikes: want to improve the experience, disagreement
as to how. (6)
. Promote walkability with longer pedestrian times. (6)
. Jay walking problem - look at design, such as barricades. (7)
. Re-evaluate pedestrian crossing signals. (7)
3.
Traffic Level of Service:
. Having a tram or minibus was mentioned. (1)
. Possibly have a shuttle bus that goes around the city. (8)
. Traffic congestion will not be helped by improving the
jobs/housing balance; it will get worse. (1)
. Level of Service, page 4-22, shows a deterioration, so this is not a
good suggestion. (1)
. Don't agree with going below Level of Service D; LOS should be
maintained at D or better. (2)
. Policy 4-5, strategy 2 is a problem; don't want the General Plan to
circumvent the rules. (2)
. Need shuttle to serve schools and De Anza College, similar to Palo
Alto. (5)
. Split on LOS D or better. The argument for allowing LOS to
deteriorate is that it forces people onto the freeway. (6)
3
. De Anza College: new buildings need mitigation. Was there an
EIR? (7)
. There is an economic downturn now; traffic could be worse in the
future. (7)
. Need to manage loading of cars in Cupertino. (8)
4.
Traffic Calming:
. School impact - how can we rectify it? Is the city working with the
schools? (1)
. Schools need more drop off points. (3)
.
More abatement in needed for school traffic. More busing; rent a
VTA bus. Encourage children to bicycle; make it safer. Have
assigned high school parking. (7)
. Four-way stops: people don't stop. Maybe cars could be let out by
sensors. (1)
. Revisit traffic calming/bumps - are they effective? (3)
.
Need more cameras. (4)
. Need more neighborhood traffic calming - use the right tool in the
right place. (6)
. Traffic calming - concern that streets parallel to 1TIajor
thoroughfares, such as Rodriguez, get overflow traffic and may
need traffic calming. (7)
5.
Other:
. Better parking enforcement is needed for festivals at parks;
neighborhoods are adversely affected. (1)
. Can a De Anza College administrator come talk to us about
improving communication? (3)
. Generally support Circulation section. (5)
4
.
Need to address the problem of red light runners. (6)
.
Shrink the Heart of the City from Stelling to Miller. (7)
G: \ Planning \ GenPlan \ Task Force \ Table Group Comments by Discussion Points 2.doc
Cupertino General Plan Task Force
Table Leader Reports
Open Space, Parks and Trails
August 20,2003
Table 1
. Policy 2-68 Open Space and Trail linkages: these should also be friendly to
bicyclists.
. Policy 2-78 School Playing Fields: table supports this and leases should be
continued beyond 2016.
. Policy 2-76: Park and Open Space Acquisition Program: table supports target
areas.
. Table supports 3 acres/l,OOO population.
Table 2
. Trail linkages - much discussion, no consensus.
. Table supports reuse of Blackberry Farm.
. Policy 2-72 Park Minimum Acreage: this is a high priority; also consider
pocket parks.
. Concerns were raised about trails infringing on private property - privacy
issues.
Table 3
. Policy 2-69 Park Acreage: State that the city's intent it not to use eminent
domain.
. Figure 5-1. Distinguish between future and proposed trail linkages.
. Policy 2-64 Blackberry Farm: table supports transition to community park.
. Policy 2-76 Park and Open Space Acquisition Program: is extremely
important. Consider parks less than 3 acres in size. Some neighborhoods won't
be able to have larger parks. Want dialogue with neighborhoods.
. Policy 2-75 Acquisition of Surplus School Property: great idea. However,
make sure proper facilities, e.g., parking, are in place.
Table 4
Policy 2-78 School Playing Fields: How will the city encourage the school to
build upward? What are alternate parking solutions?
Policy 2-75 Acquisition of Surplus School Property: agreed with Table 3.
Policy 2-74 Park Access and Visibility: suggest making solar powered phones
available for public safety.
There was a discussion of who maintains the various regional resources.
2
. Policy 2-64 Blackberry Farm: make clear what" charges per person" entry fee
includes with regard to each facility. Define each separately and what is
available with each facility.
. Page 2-60 Private open space: Are the riding stables still there?
. Policy 2-87 Late Evening Activities: where it the Downtown Village?
. Blackberry Farm: who can it be used year around?
Table 5
. Table supports the Parks and Open Space section: complete the Stevens
Creek trail, supports 3 acres/l,OOO population, connect parks, keep golf course.
. Is the 3 acres/l,OOO population practical?
. Handicap access should be addressed.
. Concerned that decisions are driven by money, not by the need for open
space.
. Blackberry: would non-residents be able to use it?
. Retain the rural feeling. May not be able to attain the development proposed
and still retain the rural feeling.
Table 6
. Policy 2-64 Blackberry Farm: Blackberry Farm should be a community park
until the end of the bond period. Golf course should be maintained; it is a
revenue generator. Residents should have a fee advantage.
. Policy 2-68 Open Space and Trail Linkages: table supports. Concern over
financial investment. Create a plan and implement when the time is right.
. Policy 2-75 Acquisition of Surplus School Property: table supports but is
skeptical.
. Policy 2-76 and 77 Park and Open Space Acquisition Program: supports F-l
and K. M (Valko) is questioned; depends on residential decision.
. Policy 2-78 School Playing Fields: supportive especially if in the form 0
financial transfer. Explore use of the high schools and De Anza College.
. Deep Cliff Golf Course: if it is proposed for development, would be a loss.
Begin to think of contingencies now.
Table 7
. Process: Add a topic discussion meting. Raise topics that didn't come up,
e.g., undergrounding utilities. Come next week with a card with topics. Staff
prepares list and group votes on topics. Table is concerned about the format of
the presentation and the City Council interaction.
. Historic buildings: McClellan Ranch - should work to preserve and
potentially resuse historical buildings.
. Need large park at east side of City, Stevens Creek Boulevard near Lawrence
Expressway.
3
. Policy 2-69 Park Acreage: supports 3 acres/l,OOO population. Encourage on-
site recreational development.
. How will Stevens Creek corridor project be reflected in the General Plan; are
there any conflicts with the trail plan?
. Concern about parking for new City Center park.
. Blue Pheasant restaurant should stay.
. Trails: link the Baylands to the Santa Cruz Mountains.
. Set aside mountain lands for orienteering.
. Policy 2-78 School Playing Fields: support schools building up not out; two
floor is OK.
. Maintain library soccer field.
. 2-64 Blackberry Farm: clarify that it refers to residents, not residences.
Table 8
. Policy 2-68: Concerned about the impact of implementing Strategy 1, linkage
between major employment centers, Heart of the City and major open space
areas.
. Table supports Blackberry Farm reuse; supports trails, walkability and use for
Cupertino residents.
. Supports preserving school playing fields, but building up is a concern.
. Neighborhood parks in F-l, K, M: group doesn't support more dense
housing, so needs are being met.
G:planning/genplan/task force/8-20-03 table leader reports
Table Group Comments by Discussion Points
Open Space, Parks and Trails - 08/20/03
(number in parenthesis is table number)
1.
Trail Linka~es:
. Policy 2-68 Open Space and Trail linkages: these should also be
friendly to bicyclists. (1)
. Traillinkages: much discussion, no consensus. (2)
. Concerns were raised about trails infringing on private property -
privacy issues. (2)
. Figure 5-1. Distinguish between future and proposed trail linkages.
(3)
. Policy 2-68 Open Space and Trail Linkages: table supports.
Concern over financial investment. Create a plan and implement
when the time is right. (6)
. How will Stevens Creek corridor project be reflected in the General
Plan; are there any conflicts with the trail plan? (7)
. Trails: link the Baylands to the Santa Cruz Mountains. (7)
. Policy 2-68: Concerned about the impact of implementing Strategy
1, linkage between major employment centers, Heart of the City
and major open space areas. (8)
2.
Parks and Oven Svace Acquisition:
. Policy 2-76: Park and Open Space Acquisition Program: table
supports target areas. (1)
. Policy 2-76: Park and Open Space Acquisition Program: is
extremely important. Consider parks less than 3 acres in size.
Some neighborhoods won't be able to have larger parks. Want
dialogue with neighborhoods. (3)
. Need large park at east side of City, Stevens Creek Boulevard near
Lawrence Expressway. (7)
2
3.
Blackberry Farm:
. Table supports reuse of Blackberry Farm. (2)
. Policy 2-64 Blackberry Farm: Table supports transition to
community park. (3)
. Policy 2-64 Blackberry Farm: Make clear what" charges per
person" entry fee includes with regard to each facility. Define each
separately and what is available with each facility. (4)
. Blackberry Farm: Who can it be used year around? (4)
. Blackberry: Would non-residents be able to use it? (5)
. Policy 2-64 Blackberry Farm: Blackberry Farm should be a
community park until the end of the bond period. Golf course
should be maintained; it is a revenue generator. Residents should
have a fee advantage. (6)
. Blue Pheasant restaurant should stay. (7)
. 2-64 Blackberry Farm: Clarify that it refers to residents, not
residences. (7)
. Table supports Blackberry Farm reuse; supports trails, walkability
and use for Cupertino residents. (8)
4.
School Properties:
. Policy 2-78 School Playing Fields: Table supports this and leases
should be continued beyond 2016. (1)
. Policy 2-75 Acquisition of Surplus School Property: Great idea.
However, make sure proper facilities, e.g., parking, are in place. (3)
. Policy 2-78 School Playing Fields: How will the city encourage the
school to build upward? What are alternate parking solutions? (4)
. Policy 2-75 Acquisition of Surplus School Property: agreed with
Table 3. (4)
3
. Policy 2-75 Acquisition of Surplus School Property: table supports
but is skeptical. (6)
. Policy 2-78 School Playing Fields: supportive especially if in the
form of financial transfer. Explore use of the high schools and De
Anza College. (6)
. Policy 2-78 School Playing Fields: support schools building up not
out; two floors is OK. (7)
. Supports preserving school playing fields, but building up is a
concern. (8)
5.
Parks in Neighborhoods F-l, K, M:
. Policy 2-76 and 77 Park and Open Space Acquisition Program:
supports F-l and K. M(Vallco) is questioned; depends on
residential decision. (6)
. Neighborhood parks in F-l, K, M: group doesn't support more
dense housing, so needs are being met. (8)
6.
PopulationlPark Ratio
. Table supports 3 acres/l,OOO population. (1)
. Policy 2-69 Park Acreage: State that the city's intent is not to use
eminent domain. (2)
. Table supports the Parks and Open Space section: complete the
Stevens Creek trail, supports 3 acres/l,OOO population, connect
parks, keep golf course. (5)
. Is the 3 acres/l,OOO population practical? (5)
. Policy 2-69 Park Acreage: supports 3 acres/l,OOO population.
Encourage onsite recreational development. (7)
7.
Other
. Policy 2-74 Park Access and Visibility: suggest making solar
powered phones available for public safety. (4)
. There was a discussion of who maintains the various regional
resources. (4)
4
. Policy 2-60 Private Open Space: Are the riding stables still there?
(4)
. Policy 2-87 Late Evening Activities: Where is the Downtown
Village? (4)
. Handicap access should be addressed. (5)
. Concerned that decisions are driven by money, not by the need for
open space. (5)
. Retain the rural feeling. May not be able to attain the development
proposed and still retain the rural feeling. (5)
. Deep Cliff Golf Course: If it is proposed for development, would
be a loss. Begin to think of contingencies now. (6)
. Historic buildings: McClellan Ranch - should work to preserve
and potentially reuse historical buildings. (7)
. Concern about parking for new City Center park. (7)
. Set aside mountain lands for orienteering. (7)
. Maintain library soccer field. (7)
G: \ Planning \ GenPlan\ Task Forœ\ Table Group Comments by Discussion Points 3.doc
CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN TASK FORCE
RECOMMENDATIONS
Sustainability (Green Buildings, Open Space, Parks and Trails)
August 27, 2003
VOTES AND COMMENTS
(The number of the table group is in parentheses)
. Should the principles of sustainability be incorporated into
Cupertino's planning and development system? (policy 5-1)
Encourage the conservation and efficient use of electrical power
and natural gas resources (policy 5-2)
Encourage the design and construction of energy and resource
conserving/ efficient building (Green Building Design) (Policy 5-3)
Preliminary Vote: 49 yes (although 1 abstained on 5-2, see above)
Comments:
Subject to reasonable costs. Want to conform to Federal
requirements, but not better than that. Do not reduce fees. Do not
require more shade trees or solar heating for pools. Say encourage,
not require. Do not participate in audits and energy evaluation. (2)
Consider costs of whole life cycle, look at incentives, consider an
Energy Commission. (3)
Resurrect Energy Commission. Likes incentive programs.
Additional issues should be addressed. (5)
Yes if consistent with budget constraints. Encourage, not
mandatory. (6)
Yes if reasonable scope and cost. (8)
. Should Cupertino dedicate or acquire trail linkages to connect areas
and provide for a more walkable community? (policy 2-68)
Preliminary Vote: 41 yes, 7 no, 1 abstain
Comments:
Amend Policy 2-68, point 3: where appropriate, as defined by utilizing a
formal public process. (1)
Implement County master plan and Stevens Creek Trail plan. Concerned
about eminent domain. Reference to "where appropriate" is too vague.
(2)
Do not use eminent domain. (3)
Yes if consistent with budget constraints. Concerns about privacy and
safety. (6)
Cost concerns for both acquisition and operations & maintenance. (7)
Yes if no impact to traffic, sensitive to local businesses and residents, and
if linkage purchases are fiscally prudent. (8)
. Should Blackberry Farm we reused as a community park? (Policy 2-64,
Policy 2-76)
Preliminary Vote: 34 yes, 15 no
Comments:
The Master Plan would need to include user-pay areas where appropriate,
to support the running costs of the park. (1)
Charge more for golf for non-residents. (2)
Should be multi-purpose. (3)
Very concerned about bond issue. Do not want to reduce revenue
generation. (5)
Consider reuse by segments - golf course, Blue Pheasant, park areas.
Change fee schedule to favor residents. (7)
Year-round park, favor residents. (8)
Two table groups were confused about the question, which could
account for the large no vote.
. Should Cupertino acquire school properties and preserve school
playing fields? (Policy 2-75, Policy 2-78)
Preliminary Vote: 44 yes, 5 no
Comments:
The properties should be held in "trust" and preserved for the utilization
by schools or parks as needed, but not be sold off to building developers.
(1)
OK for schools to build up to two stories. Allow kids to drive to school.
(2)
Why should taxpayers pay twice? (3)
. Should neighborhood parks in neighborhoods F-l, K and M be
acquired or dedicated? (Table 2-C)
Preliminary Vote: 46 yes, 3 no (includes 6 yes votes if M is excluded and 7
votes for only in K)
Comments:
Subject to the need of areas Fl, K and M, based on requirements at the
time, and with proper utilization of a public process. (1)
Park needed at four corners - F-l, F-2, L-l, L-2. (2)
Acquire in K, Fl and dedicate in M. (3)
2
Don't need 3 acres; consider pocket parks. Does Rancho Rinconada
already have a park; this might change the answer for K. M not a high
priority. (5)
No on M. (6)
Only K. Consider pocket parks. Added growth causes imbalance. (8)
. Otherls
Concern about air quality. (6) (8)
3
Other/s
CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN TASK FORCE
RECOMMENDATIONS
Share the Road (Circulation) August 27, 2003
Should Cupertino work closely with neighboring jurisdictions and
agencies responsible for roadway, transit facilities and transit services in
Cupertino? (Policy 4-1)
Preliminary Vote: 49 yes (3 votes include vote for no density in the transit
corridor)
Comments:
3-3 vote on no density in rapid transit corridors. (2)
Para-transit only in Santa Clara County. (4)
Not supportive of jobs/housing balance. (6)
Yes if prove positive impact. (8)
. Should increased emphasis be placed on pedestrians and bicyclists in
the draft General Plan, and if so, how?
0 Possibly add pedestrian time to traffic signal phase
(Policy 4-3)
Preliminary Vote: 42 yes, 6 no, 1 shrug
Comments:
A budget is to be set aside to be spent for pedestrian and bicyclist
facilitation, just like it is done for traffic. (1)
Don't reduce street width (4-2 vote). (2)
How about skywalks? (3)
More countdown crossing signals, better curb cut placements,
better sidewalk continuity. (4)
Split issue, all bike riders registered and bike laws enforced, widen
all bike lanes, massive education campaign. Increase sidewalks,
trees and walkability. Flowers. (5)
Pedestrian time is not the issue. Should add red light camera to
discourage red light runners and bring in a source of income. (6)
Beware of negative impacts. No major road improvements; use
ped-friendly lights, count down numbers, more medians with
vegetation. (8)
4
0 Promote Safe Routes to School program
(Policy 4-3)
Preliminary Vote: 43 yes (one table did not vote)
Comments:
General Plan needs to have more specific implementation.
Set aside specific streets. City should set up a grid of
pedjbike friendly streets, same as the safe route streets.
Parents could sign up for 1 day a year for to-school
monitoring at these corners. (8)
. Should local street designs be suited to the requirements of the area
served? (Policy 4-7)
Preliminary Vote: 34 yes, 16 no
Comments:
This does not give any recommendation for narrowing of any streets. A
case-by-case study and decision based on the volume and ease of flow of
traffic at each street would determine the decision. (1)
Far too vague; as long as it promotes ped and bike safety and encourages
walking. (5)
Yes as long as neighbors have a say. (6)
. Should Level of Service D be maintained except E + allowed at Stevens
Creek Blvd. intersections at De Anza and Stelling and De Anza and
Bollinger to accommodate Heart of the City (Policy 4-5)
Preliminary Vote: 20 yes, 29 no, 1 abstain
Comments:
Speed cameras, speed bumps, senor operated stop sign traffic lights
should be installed, which would allow OIÙY one car at a time to go
through a 4-way stop, to be implemented as needed and what works best
for each street. (1)
One yes vote for E+ at Stevens Creek and De Anza OIÙY. (2)
At what cost? Not widening the streets. (3)
Four would say yes with deletion of E+. (5)
Yes, but with no compromise of pedjbike safety. (6)
Improve to C and shrink the Heart of the City to Stelling to Miller OIÙY. (7)
No clogged heart arteries at heart of city. (8)
. Should traffic calming measures be employed to discourage traffic
from using neighborhood streets? (Policy 4-12)
Preliminary Vote: 38 yes, 11 no, 1 abstain (2 people who voted yes don't
support speed bumps)
Comments:
5
City should look into reinstating user-pay bus service for elementary
school at least. (1)
Neighborhood agreement needed, except child safety is paramount. (6)
Leave as is and encourage alternate forms of transport. Scarce funds can
be better used to enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety. Create visual
barriers to residential secondary street entrances. (7)
Rethink speed bumps, round abouts. (8)
. Should school traffic impacts on neighborhoods be minimized? (Policy
4-14)
Preliminary Vote: 44 yes, 5 no, 1 abstain
Comment:
How can city and school district cooperate on incentives for carpooling,
walking and biking? (4)
. Other/s
Bring back quarries for discussion. (2) (8)
G:p1anrring/ genplan/task force/answers to fundamental questions 8-27-03
6
GENERAL PLAN TASK FORCE QUESTIONS
Revised 8/20/03
Introduction
The following questions were asked by task force members during the
summer of 2003. The questions followed specific presentations from
municipal service providers such as the school districts, fire department and
police; and from technical panel members including representatives of various
city departments, non-profit housing providers and a retail consultant.
Subject Categories
The questions are arranged into major subject categories as follows:
Development
Housing
Traffic
Fiscal
Schools
Public Services
Miscellaneous
Operational questions unrelated to general plan policy
Questions unanswered from the most recent meeting(s) are placed at the
beginning so task force members can easily obtain the most recent answers.
Following their initial publication they are then sorted into the above
categories in the main text of the document.
Many of the questions asked by Task Force members focus on detailed
operational issues and are not related to general plan policy. Due to the
volume of questions (starting with the questions from August 13, 2003) staff
will provide written responses only to the policy questions. The remaining
operational questions are listed at the end of this document. Task Force
members interested in these operational questions can ask these questions
"off-line" of the appropriate staff by calling or e-mailing them during the
week. Please direct your questions to the following staff members:
Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development (408) 777-3218 stevep@cupertino.org
Ciddy Wordell, City Planner, (408) 777-3236 cynthiaw@cupertino.org
Glenn Goepfert, Assistant Director of Public Works (408) 777-3244 glenng@cupertino.org
Therese Smith, Director of Parks and Recreation, (408) 777-3268
John Hirokawa, Captain, Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office, iohn.hirokawa@sho.co.santa-
dara.ca.us. (408) 868-6612
Ken Waldvogel, Assistant Chief, Santa Gara County Fire Department, (408) 378-4010
Questions from the meeting of August 13, 2003 and previously unanswered
questions from the meeting of August 6, 2003.
What are the tax implications vis-à-vis (between) the city and the
developer? If Cupertino stops developing new housing units and
remains a suburb, what are the tax implications?
Sales tax generating uses (retail, restaurants and business to business sales offices) and
hotels (transient occupancy tax) bring in the most revenue per square foot to the city and
more than cover the cost of serving these uses. Also, these taxes are on-going which
assures the city of a continuing revenue stream. Residential uses generate a small on-
going property tax, some incidental sales taxes from purchases in Cupertino and one-
time park dedication fees. These revenues probably do not cover the long-term costs of
serving residential development but the discrepancy is probably minor for developments
located in the core area of the city. Over time, the city would be in a slightly better fiscal
position if it stopped developing any new residential. It is precisely this reality that
prompted the State Legislature to insist that communities must do their "fair share" of
housing. The projected increase in housing is approximately 10% growth over the
existing supply for the next 20 years.
. Is the city fiscally sound and is there a fiscal document for the city?
What is the fiscal situation for Cupertino? Do we have a balanced
budget or do we currently run a deficit?
Yes, the City is fiscally sound although we are challenged during these difficult economic
times to balance the budget. The city is keeping some vacant positions unfilled and has
cut back or delayed certain Capital Improvement Projects. Additionally, the city is
scrutinizing any new programs to avoid adding costs. The fiscal documents for the city
include the Annual Budget and the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (last
published for the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2002). We are required to balance our
budget and do not run a deficit. However, the city has an economic uncertainty reserve
that we find necessary to tap into during prolonged recessions.
What is the time frame (number of years) for implementing the General Plan?
Is 10 years a feasible time for implementing the General Plan? What is the
rough estimate (in percentage) of how well the 1993 General Plan was
implemented?
The time frame for the General Plan is 20 years although it is recognized that it will
undergo more frequent review and possible modifications as specific issues arise. The
General Plan sets the direction and blueprint for change. The key indicators in the 1993
plan were about 85% implemented. The development community built most of the
housing and several hotels. However, the commercial allocation was reduced, due to the
2
impact of regional centers such as Valley Fair and Santana Rowand the removal of some
marginal retail centers such as the former P.J.Mulligan 's center, which was replaced by
Tra Vigne. The major office construction occurred with the Apple Headquarters
building in the early 1990s. Otherwise, little new office has been constructed. The city
maintained the level of service standards on most streets due to the positive influence of
Highway 85 but added little traffic carrying capacity on its own. The city added some
affordable housing on Stevens Creek Boulevard and Vista Drive and saw the construction
of a new fire station and renovation of another station both located on Stevens Creek
Boulevard. The city added park acerage with the acquisition of Blackberry Farm and the
Stocklemier property and constructed Creekside Park. Several trail connections along
Regnart Creek and Saratoga Creek were completed.
Why is the term "affordable housing" ever used here? This phrase
should be expunged from all printed city items - please just use BMR
which is all one could hope for.
The term affordnble housing is used because in addition to BMR units, required of all
new residential development, the city has actively encouraged or helped to fund several
non-profit affordnble housing developments, the most recent being the 24 unit Cupertino
Community Services development on Vista Drive behind the fire station. However, BMR
units are and will continue to be the main source of new affordable housing in the city.
Is Monta Vista mixed-use working- with reg-ard to retail? Are residents
in mixed-use happy? (ThisQuestion was previously answered but
staff was able to obtain more information from Los Gatos and
Campbell about their residential developments located over
restaurants)
Staff asked Geoff Bradley, Senior Planner with the City of Campbell, and Bud Lortz,
Director of Community Development with the Town of Los Gatos, if they have received
complaints from residents living over or near restaurants. Bud Lortz indicated that he is
not aware of any specific complaints from residents over the Le Boulanger Restaurant,
Posh Bagel, Siena Café or the apartments located over the Southern Kitchen on Main
Street in Los Gatos. He was surprised that residents haven't complained about the
strong coffee smell coming from the Los Gatos Coffee Roasting Company when they'
roast the coffee beans adjacent to the condominiums next to the downtown park. Geoff
Bradley with the City of Campbell indicated they had some complaints from residents of
a 20 unit apartment project located over the Stacks Restaurant. However, the
complaints were limited to patrons smoking outside the restaurant, streetlight glare and
early morning trash pick-up times. Trash pickup was subsequently changed to a later
hour. There were no specific complaints about odors or noise from the restaurant.
3
What are the taxi financial implications to the city as a redevelopment
agenda for Valko? Does the redevelopment phase of Valko end in 2006?
The redevelopment plmse for Vallco is not tied to the development agreement tlmt expires
in 2006. The redevelopment plmse will start whenever the property owner/developer
decides to expand or add new buildings and uses at Vallco Fashion Park and ifhe/she
asks for financial assistance from the Agency. Such assistance could help fund street
improvements, parking garages, or tenant improvements, etc. The Redevelopment
Agency's ability to assist with improvements is dependent upon the revenue stream that
comes from an increased property tax base (referred to as the tax increment) tlmt is
generated by new building activity at the center. The tax increment revenue stream can
be used to pay offbonds issued by the Agency to fund the improvements.
In the General Plan of 1990 it recommended a citizens budget advisory
committee. Was that ever developed?
The city does not Imve a citizens budget advisory committee but the City Council
annually holds several public hearings on the budget and routinely hears comments from
citizens who follow the budget review process.
There is a comment that we have no staff dedicated for Economic
Development. In that regard, what is the title of Steve Piasecki? Is
there someone who works for the City looking to attract businesses,
any procedures or possibility of reduced taxes/ subsidy?
Cupertino has an Economic Development team consisting of the Department Heads and
the City Manager but does not have fUll-time dedicated staff or associated budget for an
economic development department. Sunnyvale, for example, has four positions in their
economic development division. While the city does not have a staff devoted specifically
to economic development both Steve Piasecki and the Director of Administrative
Services, Carol Atwood play active roles in facilitating our processes to enable new
businesses and commercial development to come into the city as efficiently as possible.
Steve Piasecki's official title is "Director of Community Development." He oversees the
Planning, Building and Housingfunctions of the city and has a staff of 20 persons. See
attached organization chart.
Economic development functions (which tend to focus on business retention and
attraction) are typically financed through Redevelopment Agencies to avoid impacting
the general fUnd. Cupertino's recently created Redevelopment Project Area (RDA) is
limited to Vallco Fashion Park and hasn't created sufficient tax increment to fUnd any
staff or redevelopment efforts. It is possible to offer some limited tax reductions for sales
tax offices and the city has offered to do this in a few cases. Also, the city can assist the
developer within the RDA with some street improvements or other infrastructure such as
a parking garage using tax increment fUnding when and if substantial redevelopment of
the center increases the property tax increment.
4
Individual Council members have also been active in encouraging high quality business
to locate their companies and sales offices in Cupertino. Most recently, Vice-Mayor
James assisted with attracting Borland into the upper floors in one of the City Center
towers. We understand this will be their headquarters and they will locate a sales office
here. Additionally, staff recently met with the Chairman and President of Oakville
Grocery who signed a lease to occupy the space vacated by McWorters and Young in the
Crossroads shopping center. Staff stressed our willingness to help them in any way to
understand and expedite the process for obtaining building permits for tenant
improvements and encouraged them to incorporate outside seating.
The City has an Economic Development Committee that is comprised of representatives
from the Chamber of Commerce, staff and two city council members. The Economic
Development Committee discusses how to promote Cupertino as a positive place to do
business and meets with local businesses to determine if there is anything the city can do
to help make them successful. The Economic Development Committee meets on the third
Wednesday of every month.
Are there plans to expand or build new schools at all levels to take care
of new development? What is an acceptable number of housing units
for the High School District?
The Elementary District indicates they have the capacity to expand or contract the
number of outside students allowed into the district and/or increase the number of
portable facilities to handle any anticipated new students. The High School District does
not have the capacity to expand and may need new development to pay an impact fee to
accommodate the projected number of new students.
Staff is still working with the High School District to prepare a response to this question
about the appropriate number of new students, and will provide it as soon as we have it.
Again, it is possible to evaluate charging new residential development for their impact on
the Fremont Union High School District.
Which cities got reprimanded by ABAG? And what actually
happened to them?
Staff is researching this question with the State Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD) and our Housing Element consultant and will provide the
information once it is available.
What backup is available for huge emergencies, a la Santana Row?
Sunnyvale Public Safety? SJFD? Does Santa Clara County Fire back up
other departments?
Staff is seeking the Fire Departments in put on this question.
5
Can the Assistant Fire Chief comment on the importance of low
income housing being mandated by the city for firefighters that serve
our community?
Staff is seeking the Fire Departments in put on this question.
How much did the last fireworks event for July 4, 2002 in Cupertino
cost the city in regard to just the fire department?
Staff is seeking the Fire Departments in put on this question.
. Why is the study session [for new development] going on if we have a
General Plan Task force developing plans and meeting weekly?
On August 4, 2003, the City Council held a study session to allow the property owner of
the Cupertino Financial Center introduce plans for a proposed residential and retail
development. The site is located on the North East comer of Stevens Creek Boulevard
and Wolfe Road. The new units are proposed to be located over the existing parking lot
on the East end of the site. The City Council prefers that developers introduce their
projects so that Council Members are able to answer resident's questions about
prospective developments. Additionally, the study session format enables the Council to
provide input to the developer about major city concerns or potential issues. Since there
is no associated staff report or environmental analysis this is not seen as the definitive
public hearing process but only as a first step introduction and an opportunity to dialog
about major issues.
When the Council set up the task force they specifically asked that the Crossroads
Streetscape plan be delayed to enable the task force to consider the appropriate role for the
Crossroads commercial district. The Council did not ask to delay any of the private
development applications that may be submitted during the general plan update process.
If the Council chose to delay all development, they would need to establish a moratorium
on all forms of development that create general plan impacts (such as school or traffic
impacts) which could include all commercial, office and residential potentially including
new single-family homes and large additions. Moratoriums have far reaching economic
impacts on property owners and developers and can seriously impact the local economy.
This question about why the Council was still having study sessions was asked and
addressed during" oral communications" at the August 4, 2003 Council meeting.
How many people are currently employed in Cupertino?
According to the Association of Bay Area Governments Projections document there are
approximately 45,000 jobs in Cupertino. Staff estimates this number is closer to 40,000
jobs based on typical occupancy levels for the amount of commercial, office and industrial
6
square footage within the city. Of course, the number ofjobs is lEss during economic
downturns like we are currently experiencing. Joint Venture Silicon Valley estimates an
office vacancy rate of approximately 20% for Santa Clara County. If Cupertino vacancy
rates are similar to County-wid£ rates then the current number ofjobs would be reduced
by approximately 5,000 employees.
Public Works questions
I. Why is the city not promoting and encouraging children walking to school? The
idea of an elementary school within walking distance for each child was
historically very prominent here - now we have endless lines of idling cars
inching along - get the kids on foot!
The City absolutely supports the idea of children walking to school as a means to reduce
vehicular traffic and was extensively involved in working through the Monta Vista High
School neighborhood parking problem. However, the city has no direct contact with
parents and has no convenient mechanism to encourage all parents to help their children
walk to school. The parking and transport of children to school is an issue that needs full
support from the school districts and individual schools. The City is willing to assist their
efforts but will have little direct influence without the schools active involvement. The
task force can recommend a policy structure that encourages greater review of this
problem and encourages walking as one solution.
2. Street level of service: Has study been made on what it would take to raise level
of intersection? Ex: Take a D and make it a C.
The level of service can be raised in some limited circumstances by conventional street
improvements such as adding lanes, interconnecting signals or installing free right turn
lanes. Most of Cupertino's high volume streets have been widened to their maximum
capacity and there are no remaining conventional improvements that will help improve
LOS. Also, street widening typically requires added right of way and may impact
adjacent businesses.
3. Why would we consider reducing through lanes? Our traffic lanes seem
adequate.
The Draft General Plan proposes to study traffic calming strategies for Cupertino streets
to reduce the impacts of motor vehicles on adjacent neighborhoods throughout the
community. These concepts would extend to traffic around schools, truck traffic on
Foothill Boulevard and Stevens Canyon Road and speeding cars within neighborhoods.
The concept of calming the effect of traffic on Stevens Creek Boulevard was originally
explored in 1991 by the Grand Boulevard Committee, which concluded that "Stevens
Creek Boulevard should be recaptured to primarily serve local traffic and secondarily
serve regional traffic" (Grand Boulevard Report November 6, 1991, page 4). The grand
boulevard concept proposed to isolate the center through lanes from a local serving
frontage street using tree lined secondary medians and was very ambitious and costly. A
7
copy of this report will be made available to all Task Force members. Staff brought up
the idea of studvinf! the concept of reducing the number of lanes on Stevens Creek
Boulevard in conjunction with the Crossroads Streetscape Plan. The Crossroads
Streetscape plan proposes widened sidewalks behind the existing curb, outdoor plazas,
street tree plantings and outdoor seating for restaurants along the street. The concept
was alwavs to studv the feasibilitv of lane reductions and not to implement the concept
without understandinf! the potential impacts on level of service. Bob Harrrison, the
City's General Plan traffic consultant, stated that he believed a lane reduction may be
possible through the Crossroads area with minimal or no impact on the vehicular level of
service but that a more detailed study would be necessary to determine the potential
impacts. He reasoned that the major impact to level of service occurs at the intersections
with major streets and not in the mid-block areas, consequently, the city may need to
maintain the existing right-turn lanes at the intersections of Stevens Creek Boulevard
with De Anza Boulevard and with Stelling Road to avoid significantly impacting LOs.
The reason to consider lane reductions relates to the function and character of the street
and the image of the city. From a functional standpoint, on-street parking protects
pedestrians by separating the travel lanes from the sidewalks and the on-street parking
provides needed spaces to serve adjacent businesses. The owner of the Verona
development has asked that the city consider on-street parking to serve the retail tenants
that will occupy the 7, 000 square feet of commercial space next to the plaza soon to be
built at the corner of Stevens Creek and De Anza Boulevards. From a character and city
image standpoint, four lane roads are more suburban and "small-town" than six or
eight-lane boulevards and they are easier for pedestrians (especially school children, the
elderly or handicapped individuals) and bicyclists to cross. Almost all of the our lower
density small town neighbors limit the number of lanes on their thorough-Jares including
Los Altos, Saratoga and Los Gatos and wouldn't consider widening their boulevards to
six or eight lanes just to slightly improve LOS. Finally, fewer lanes with on-street
parking will slightly slow the travel speeds to the posted speed limits and provide a safer
environment for all who use this street.
In staff's view the question shouldn't be whether we should consider studying recapturing
a portion of the street for local purposes but how can we ensure there is minimal or no
impacts on the LOS of the street. This concept has tremendous potential to change the
image of Cupertino and should be studied to determine if Cupertino can take on the look
and appeal of our small-town neighbors. The bottom line is the Task Force can
recommend whether to study traffic-calming strategies and specifY the concerns about
maintaining LOs. Stafffeels this should be evaluated because it could enhance the
small-town character that attracts many people to Cupertino.
4. As there is minimal public transit use in Cupertino (7%), why doesn't the city
start a free (or inexpensive) shuttle service to serve some major destinations, such
as De Anza College, Vallco, etc. and along De Anza and Stevens Creek Blvd?
Palo Alto found such a shuttle service very useful. Such a shuttle service, if
properly implemented will reduce SOY considerably. The shuttle service should
use compressed native gas vehicles, fuel cell powered or electric vehicle.
8
Shuttle services are a great idea and can be effective in the right location. For instance,
the small electric shuttles in Santa Barbara shuttle guests from the water front hotels into
the very active Santa Barbara downtown. Shuttle services are expensive to run and
require high levels of ridership to justify the cost. Cupertino has no comparable
attraction that would seem to justifY the cost and staff is not aware of any shuttles that
pay their own way in a conventional suburban setting such as Cupertino. However, it
isn't necessary that the Task Force limit their recommendations to only proven transit
options. The Task Force can recommend that General Plan policies encourage a review
of alternative modes of public transit including enhanced bus and/or shuttle services once
there is evidence that the ridership could justifY the cost.
5. Will De Anza be a through road with lights timed to get people efficiently to 280,
or will it be calmed with stops at each light?
De Anza Boulevard is designed as a high-volume, relatively high-speed thoroughfare
intended to carry traffic efficiently through Cupertino to Highway 280. It was designed
as eight-lanes prior to the installation of Highway 85, which is designed to fulfill the
same fUnction. There are no plans or suggestions to "calm" traffic speeds or lower
volumes on De Anza Boulevard.
6. To improve walk-ability, how difficult is it to install strategic stop-lights at
intersections to encourage pedestrian access to shopping centers? Also, can lights
be timed to allow comfortable and safe crossings by pedestrians at these points?
Traffic signals with pedestrian crossing lights already exist at intersections next to most
of the shopping centers within the city. The lights can be timed to enhance pedestrian
crossing but any increase in pedestrian crossing time must be taken away from the
allowable green-time for vehicular movement on the major arterial street and will
probably lower the vehicular level of service.
7. With the restructuring of the elementary school districts forcing the
Faria/Jollyman school area. School children to cross 6 lanes of De Anza Blvd.
and 6 lanes of Stevens Creek Blvd starting in the year 2005. What can be done by
the city to protect our elementary school children? How can we protect kids
crossing Foothill at Homestead? CUSD has redistricted residents who live on
South Stelling Road to move from Kennedy Middle School to Collins Middle
School by 2005. Kids need to cross Stevens Creek Blvd. and De Anza. Is there
any plan (or project) for safe routes?
The question raised here is partially addressed in question number 3 above, about
studying lane reductions and in question number 1 about supporting children walking
to school. Also, Glenn Goepfert addressed the safe-routes to school program in his
presentation. The bottom line is that there is a trade-off between designing streets for
cars versus pedestrians. How much of a reduction in traffic level of service (LOS)
reduction are you willing to take to provide shorter, safer street crossings and are
9
you willing to install traffic calming devices to slow speeds and make pedestrian
routes safer? Basically there is a tradeoff between traffic LOS and pedestrian LOS.
The specific question about Foothill at Homestead should be reviewed with Glenn
Goepfert and the city's traffic technician. .
8. In Table 4-2 Level of Service - The developments proposed seem to deteriorate
on 19 streets out of the 21 streets in the table. How can we call this progress? It
seems the development has a negative impact on traffic.
Development does impact traffic LOS, which is why developments are required to
submit traffic studies and required to mitigate impacts. Also, each traffic study plugs
in development occurring around our borders and assumes a percentage of growth in
traffic volumes that is not specifically identified with any particular development.
The result is that even ifwe have no additional growth in Cupertino the traffic
projections would show a deterioration in the level of service associated with
development happening around our borders and associated with the general increase
in traffic occurring throughout the County.
9. The wide design of our neighborhood streets encourages speeding - even with
speed bumps. Cars slow down for the bump and then race to the next one. Are
new streets being designed more narrowly to reduce this problem? Can we
narrow some existing streets to reduce this problem? Are their other ways to fix
this?
In some cases traffic engineering associates traffic speeds with the amount of "side-
friction" (e.g. parked cars, landscaped bump-outs and narrow streets) and street level
friction (e.g. speed humps). You are also correct that the speed humps have limited
effectiveness as motorists want to make up for lost time between humps. The General
Plan can advocate that the city explore a variety of mechanisms to reduce traffic speeds
and volumes typically referred to as traffic calming. Certainly, lane widths are a factor
and should be explored. However, the city is fully improved and there are very few new
streets that will be installed in the future. In some cases, it may be possible to narrow
existing streets if residents are willing to bear the cost of relocating curbs and gutters.
The travel lanes on Prospect Road in Cupertino were narrowed to slow and separate the
lanes from the front of the adjacent houses. You will notice the extraordinarily wide
landscaped parkways on the North side of Prospect West of De Anza Boulevard. Stop
signs are installed on some streets and have the effect of discouraging through traffic and
slowing speeds but with the same limitations as speed humps.
10. Can Saratoga be pressured to provide access to 85 and help with traffic on De
Anza Blvd.?
Saratoga specifically limited the number of access points to Highway 85 due to concerns
about attracting traffic through their city. I seriously doubt that Saratoga could be
pressured at this point to open up a new interchange and there is very little highway
improvement money available for such an expensive improvement.
10
II. Please explain and clarify the requirements to install curbs/sidewalks in Monta
Vista re: new housing.
This question was addressed at the August 13, Task Force meeting but deserves
repeating. The City's Ordinance (Cupertino Municipal Code Chapter 14.04) requires
full street improvements of all new housing development or remodels that exceed 25% of
the value of existing improvements. The street improvements include curb, gutter,
sidewalks and street lights, except the city has a narrower semi-rural street standard that
applies to hillside lots.
12. Why are you requiring sidewalks in neighborhoods that don't have them? For
example: when somebody builds a new or remodels a home on a street, which
was a curb and gutter street. Ex: San Fernando, Camino Vista etc.
The ordinance requires street improvements as discussed in the answer to question
number 11, above. The draft plan includes a policy that will enable neighborhoods to
petition for alternative standards that can be granted when certain findings relating to
safety and consistency are met. This issue may be addressed sooner as the Council has
requested a policy that will enable the petition process that will likely be adopted prior to
completion of the General Plan. In some cases, it doesn't make sense to install street
improvements in the middle of an existing unimproved street. In those cases, the city can
take a deferred street improvement agreement that requires the property owner to install
the improvements when other property owners on the same street are required to do the
same. However, there is a time limit on those agreements and the City in some cases
must call those commitments prior to commitments from other property owners.
Questions previously answered and sorted into the topic categories.
DEVELOPMENT
How feasible is it to implement the Ahwahnee Principles? How much
change is required and how long would it take?
The Ahwahnee Principles encompass "big-ideas" of walk-ability. sustainability, open
space and building a balanced community with a "center focus" that could drive all
aspects of the General Plan and shape the community for the next twenty years. Many of
the major goals and policies in the current 1993 General Plan and the "Big Ideas" in the
Administrative Draft encompass these principles and the Task Force has been discussing
these concepts in your table groups. The first task is to determine if you agree with these
principles, then you could test all policy recommendations against them. That is, does
the plan implement these principles satisfactorily?
It is very feasible to implement these principles and the City has been implementing many
of them for years. For instance, about 15-20 years ago the city decided to incorporate
enhanced tree-lined pedestrian sidewalks and parkways along Stevens Creek Boulevard.
11
Also, thirty years ago Vallco Fashion Park was designed with Ash trees to line Wolfe
Road and at about the same time, the city adopted the North De Anza Boulevard plan
that called for extensive tree planting in that area. Today, you can see the effect of these
deliberate policies with the extensive tree lined streets in these areas. Similarly, the city
decided to implement a below market rate (BMR) housing program about 15 years which
has generated about 200 affordable housing units. The current BMR program is
projected to generate another 300 affordable units over the course of the updated plan if
the proposal in the administrative drafi to allow another 2,000 units is approved. More
recently, the city has been encouraging developers of restaurants to build outside dining
to externalize positive activities. Consequently, BJs, Quiznos, Helios, Starbucks, Alottas
Deli, Flames Restaurant (under construction), Verona commercial (under construction),
and Whole Foods Market all have outside diningfacilities. As these examples illustrate it
does take time for trees to grow, and outside dining or below market rate housing to be
built. The Ahwahee Implementation Principles advocate that the general plan is the
place to incorporate the land use related principles. You have the opportunity to
recommend to the City Council to what extent the Ahwahnee Principles should be
reflected in the updated plan.
Can we prohibit the granting of waivers by the City Council as they
pertain to building heights?
You can recommend that the General Plan be structured to require stringent findings for
exceptions to the height requirements or strict development agreements, similar to the
one we currently have with Vallco Fashion Park. Such agreements would make it
difficult to amend unless both parties agree. Beyond these measures that may make it
more difficult to change, General Plans can be amended by subsequent City Councils.
Vallco Park: what real influence do we have on what goes on in
development of Valko or other such shopping center, regarding type
of store. Do we have a say about Valko?
Cupertino development approvals do not control decisions that are made by the private
marketplace, i.e., which tenants will be in which store space. The commercial controls
relate to uses that have different parking requirements, e.g., if a restaurant wants to go
into a shopping center, it must meet the restaurant parking requirements, or late night
activities (past 11:00 PM) or entertainment activities, such as dancing or live music,
require issuance of a separate use permit.
Vallco has development potential locked into its Development Agreement, so they are
guaranteed about 500,000 square feet of additional commercial or office space. This
development must go through the public hearing process to obtain design approval for
any physical design changes to the center but the general commercial uses are locked in
by the development agreement through 2006.
Does mixed-use work? (answered at meeting)
12
Mixed-use is actually an old form of development that is making a resurgence in
communities throughout the country. Mixed-use is seen as a form of "smart growth"
because it more efficiently uses the land area and can provided housing opportunities
nearby existing shopping areas where residents can walk to services or access public
transit (bus routes). Mixed-use is also seen as a means to activate commercial strips and
provide resident" eyes and ears" on the street thereby reporting and deterring crime.
Developers make the economic decision whether to invest in mixed-use, and they
wouldn't make significant investments in a form of development if it didn't work.
Cupertino has several examples of horizontal and vertical mixed-use projects in the
Monta Vista area that were built in the 1980s and along Stevens Creek Boulevard in the
Heart of the City. Also, mixed-use exists in many surrounding suburban communities
such as Santa Clara, Sunnyvale, Mountain View, Palo Alto, Campbell and Los Gatos.
Does the population increase benefit the residents of Cupertino?
Most of Cupertino's population increases over the past 25 years occurred as a result of
annexations of existing development. Cupertino annexed approximately 10,000 residents
from the City of San Jose in the mid-1980s, and about 5,200 unincorporated residents of
Rancho Rinconada in 1999 and Garden Gate in 2001. The fiscal analysis for the Rancho
Rinconada annexation demonstrated the revenues would be slightly less than the cost of
providing services. It could be argued that the cost of annexing the unincorporated
pockets costs the city more to repair or replace ailing infrastructure such as streets,
sidewalks, streetlights and storm sewers. Additionally, the city has spent a considerable
effort with code enforcement in these neighborhoods to "clean-up" some dilapidated
properties.
The city approached these annexations from the standpoint of what was in the interest of
"good government." That is Cupertino is the most logical local service agency and can
provide municipal services more efficiently than the County of some other city.
Consequently, it makes the most sense for Cupertino to annex and provide these essential
services even though it may cost more to serve these areas than the revenues they bring
in. Additionally, these islands consist of residents who enjoy all of the Cupertino
amenities such as great schools and parks, etc., and are neighbors of Cupertino who
should participate in all local decision making and become full participants in the
community in which they live. The remaining unincoporated area to annex is Monta
Vista, which is a mixture of city and county lots and arguably should be within the city
limits.
The population increase from new residential development located in the core area of
Cupertino is probably a fiscal plus for the city. First, new development must pay for
needed street improvements, park fees, school fees, utility taxes, and construction taxes.
New development must mitigate any known impacts such as sanitary sewer and traffic
impacts. For instance, most of the widening along De Anza Boulevard was paid for by
new development along that street and not by the existing residents of the community.
13
In addition to sewer and traffic mitigations, the city could evaluate the impacts to the
high school district and require that new residential development pay a one-time or
possibly an annual fee to compensate the district for quantifiable impacts associated with
new development. The fact remains that the number of high sclwol students that will
occupy condominium or townhouse developments along Stevens Creek Boulevard are
considerably less per unit than the number of high school students generated from
conventional single-family housing units.
Staff is doing additional research on revenue analysis.
How do we limit heights of the buildings so the mountains and views
aren't obstructed?
The city has ambitious street tree planting plans along Stevens Creek Boulevard and De
Anza Boulevard that also blocks views of the hillsides. In actuality, Cupertino has many
breaks in the building forms that afford views of the hillsides and the potential for
continuous building walls that may block views is limited. However, General Plan
policies could be devised to address this concern, although the concern would need to be
defined, i.e., which views slwuld be protected, what are acceptable heights, would such
restrictions inadvertently discourage a vibrant business environment?
Is Monta Vista mixed-use working with regard to retail? Are residents
in mixed-use happy?
Mixed-use in Monta Vista is predominantly residential over office with a few retail
commercial uses located under residences. The mixed-use is located on streets
perpendicular to Stevens Creek Boulevard, so they are not good sites for retail uses.
There probably are inconveniences or nuisances when residential is located above office or
retail, altlwugh people have been living in mixed-use environments for a long time and
have not been deterred by these impacts.
Many of the mixed-use developments in Cupertino are "horizontal" vs. "vertical" mixed
use, so the residential uses are next to and not above the office/commercial uses. Also, it
may be beneficial to look at vertical mixed-use in Los Gatos where six condominiums are
located over the Le Boulanger restaurant next to the downtown park and apartments are
located over the Siena restaurant on Main Street. The condominiums are re-selling in
the $600,000 plus category (considered "affordable" in Los Gatos and the apartments
appear fully occupied. Additionally, there are 20 apartments located over the Stacks
Restaurant in Downtown Campbell that appear to be fully occupied.
The concept of whether residents of mixed-use are happy is obviously difficult to answer.
However, it should be noted that our desired lwusing type changes as we go through life's
stages. A college student seeking a temporary living situation may be pleased to secure a
mixed-use, presumably more affordable apartment in the Monta Vista area of Cupertino.
14
When that same person is raising a family they will likely prefer a larger townhouse or
single family /wme. The Task Force s/wuld focus on whether Cupertino s/wuld strive to
provide a mixture of /wusing types to satisfy the needs of residents as they go through the
different life stages.
. Why is there so much potential for hotel rooms (1000 rooms)?
The Vallco Fashion Park 1990 Development Agreement locked in 1000 hotel rooms in the
Vallco area (until 2006). Marriott Courtyard and Hilton Garden Inn drew that down to
a remaining potential of 713 rooms. Hotels are generally seen as a positive revenue
generator for local government (from transient occupancy taxes paid by non-residents)
with minimal impacts (traffic is typically off-peak, schools are not impacted). A single
hotel can generate from $350,000 per year for a 100+ room moderate cost hotel to
$1,000,000 per year for a high-end /wtel with 200+rooms,during good economic times.
The 1,000 room number probably started in the 1970's when Cupertino approved an 18-
story Marriott Hotel (never constructed) on the Hewlett Packard property at the corner
of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Finch Avenue.
. How much development has been built and approved between 2000
and 2003?
Development Reallocation Table
d86-03 h 2003b 1
d
d
Revise - tos ow Ultan approve
1990 2000 2003 Existing Proposed Proposed
Built Built Built and General Changes General
Approved Plan from Plan
Existing
GP
Commercial 3,359,000 3,317,426 3,906,727* 4,431,000 -256,864 4,174,136
Office/Indust. 7,457,000 8,325,312 8,471,032 9,428,000 -107,995 9,320,005
Hotel 277 441 1,501 ** 1,578 0 1,578
Residential 17,460 20,032 20,832 22,369 2,278 24,647
*Includes 535,000 square feet committed to Vallco Fashion Park through 2006
**Includes 713 rooms committed to Valko Planning Area through 2006
. Menlo Equities is building a project near Valko. What is their vision and
plan for this site?
During a study session on August 4, 2003, Menlo Equities introduced the concept of
building a mixed-use development in the parking lot of the Cupertino Financial Center
located at the North East comer of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Wolfe Road. They
cannot start building the project until they have obtained approvals from the City
Council following public hearing, At this stage the development plan is only a concept.
15
They would like to build approximately 120 ownership condominium units with about
7,000 square feet of retail commercial on the ground floor facing Stevens Creek
Boulevard. They envision a mixed-use project that will provide housing to help support
a mixed-use Vallco Park area along with a similar development on the HP site. Anybody
who is interested can view the plans at City Hall in the Community Development
Department. Also, staffwill be incorporating this project into the Development Activity
Report in during the week of August 18, 2003. The Development Activity Report is
accessible on the City's web site at www.cuvertino.orf!.
How difficult is it for developers to work with our city compared to
others?
The degree of difficulty for developers is a function of many variables such as the
complexity of the project, existing rules that are in place, environmental impacts such as
traffic. tree preservation and noise, and the degree of input and issues raised by affected
residents prior to and during the public hearing process. Staff attempts to alert
developers to issues before they file a formal application and advise them of all relevant
policies and development standards. Additionally, developers are encouraged to meet
with affected neighbors to hear their concerns prior to finalizing plans. For more
complicated projects it is not uncommon for the developer to hold three or four
community meetings with affected neighbors. In the case of the Town Center
development the plan was previewed to the neighbors who effectively lobbied the council
and the applicant to amend the plan so that it conformed to all aspects of the General
Plan relative to building heights prior to a final decision by the City Council. The plan
went through numerous changes that took three years prior to its approval. We have
heard many compliments from developers who are successful and have been criticized
from those that aren 't. 1n the end, the degree of difficulty for Cupertino developments is
probably similar to other communities in the Bay Area who have similar standards for
development quality and equally complex projects.
What is the status of Vallco redevelopment?
Vallco Fashion Park (not including Sears and Penny's that sit on their own parcels) was
sold in June to a group of local investors who plan to renovate and bring Vallco back to
life. They initially plan to open a large 1,300seat restaurant including banquet rooms
and a dance floor. They intend to provide some external cosmetic enhancements
including fixing the fountains and installing decorative banners along Wolfe Road.
Over the long term, they hope to attract more successful retail and restaurant tenants
and would like to build some housing. The city hopes to encourage more commercial,
lodging and/or entertainment space and would like to see Vallco renovated into an inside
and outside mall with a mixed-use village format that will be successful over the long
term. So far, the new investors have not proposed any new building activity and haven't
asked for the City Redevelopment Agency to assist with any public or parking
improvements.
16
Regarding Tra Vigne, how many businesses were in the shopping center
and how much revenue did they generate? How many businesses
currently and how much income will they generate assuming full
occupancy at today's rental rate? How many designated parking spots are
allocated for the businesses and 5,500 sq. ft. office space at the second level?
The Tra Vigne site was formally occupied by about a dozen tenants encompassing 19,100
square feet, including the P.J. Mulligan's restaurant and bar (which was closed), a shoe
repair shop and several miscellaneous retail and office uses plus the Dairy Belle
restaurant located in a separate building on the comer. The center was an example of an
older, under-utilized, poorly maintained, unattractive, partially vacant, under performing
shopping center. Tra Vigne replaced it with 46 condominium units and 11,300 square
feet of retail and office on the 1.7 3acre site. Staff does not have specific numbers but
estimates that the previous use was generating about $5,000 in sales tax for the city due
to the vacancies and predominantly office uses on the site. The new use should generate
about double that amount with about half of the commercial space. Additionally, the
residential is required to pay $332,100 in one-time park dedication fees and$19,IOO in
construction tax. Due to the extraordinarily low property tax the new valuation will
bring in only afew thousand dollars in property taxes. You can view the project
description on the City's web site at www.cupertino.org.
What are the square foot numbers on that table that have been approved
but not built out for commercial buildings?
A new column has been added to the above table to answer this question.
HOUSING
When we talk about affordable housing, do we mean rental units?
Affordable housing can mean rental or ownership units. The Cupertino Community
Services development on Vista Drive behind the Fire Station is an all rental project with
24 affordable units. The five BMR units in the Tra Vigne development on Stevens Creek
Boulevard and the 18 BMR units in the Oak Valley development on Cristo Rey Drive are
ownership units.
What percent of Cupertino residents also work in Cupertino?
Currently there are no good sources on how many people both live and work in
Cupertino. I would imagine the percentage is relatively low, probably below
10%, but we have no data to back up that estimate.
What are the criteria for BMR (Low-Income) housing?
17
I assume you mean what are the criteria for persons wishing to qualify for the BMR
units? Persons qualify for these units based on their median family income relative the
HUD income limits for Santa Clara County per the following chart:
HUD Income Limits
Median 81% -100%
Mnderate 101 % - 120%
59,100 67500
73,850 84,400
88,600 101,300
76000 84400 91200 97900
94,950 105,500 113,950 122,400
113,950 126.600 136,750 146,850
104,700 111 400
130,800 139,250
157,000 167,100
Income limits are revised by the U. S. Department of Housing aod Urban Development on an annual basis.
Revised 4/03
The numbers across the top reflects household size. One-half of the rental BMR units are
allotted to households making no more than 50% of the median income and the other half
is designated for households making no more than 80% of the median income. For
ownership units one-half of the units must be offered to households making 100% of the
median and the other half to persons making 120% of the median income. The
households are also evaluated relative to whether they are Cupertino residents, work in
Cupertino and if they are a public service employee such as fire fighters or schoolteachers.
The full text of the Housing Mitigation Procedural Manual can be viewed on the City's
web site at www.cupertino.orz by navigating through the deparhnents and then going to
the page for Planning Building and Housing. Or, you can use the following address to
get directly to the page with the reference to the Housing Mitigation Manual and then
click on the PD F format of the manual on the bottom of the page:
http://www.cuvertino.orzfcity zovernment/devarhnents and o(fices/plannin~ and buil
dinzjindex.asp
How many apartments/town homes are in the mixed-use area of Monta
Vista?
There are eight mixed-use buildings in Monta Vista, South of Stevens Creek Boulevard
(fronting on Pasadena Avenue, Granada Avenue, Imperial Avenue and Pasadena
Avenue) with a total of23 housing units. 19 of these units are apartments and four are
condominiums.
If we need more housing, why do we have such limited sizes for
secondary units, which could be used as rental properties?
Secondary units are limited in size because they are allowed within existing single-family
neighborhoods and intended for the purpose of housing family members or rented out.
18
The city does not want secondary units to attract large Iwuselwld sizes with numerous
vehiclEs and storage needs nor does the city want secondary units to take on the form of
duplex districts or significantly add to the massing of residential structures in single-
family neighborlwods.
Why do we have to pay attention to ABAG? (answered at meeting)
The ABAG numbers represent a State-wide effort to provide more housing opportunities
and correct the imbalance of jobs to housing that has congested our freeways, polluted our
air and cost $billions in needed road and transi.t improvements. Consequently, the "fair
share" approach has been viewed as an effort to enhance the supply and encourage many
suburban communities to be part of the solution instead of part of the problEm.
Cupertino approved many more job producing uses during the 1970s and 1980s
exacerbating our imbalance of jobs to housing. So, we have certainly added to the present
imbalance. However, at the same time we don't have full confidence in the ABAG
housing numbers and the current number is only valid through 2006.
Staff suggests that the Task Force first determine what type of housing mix Cupertino
wants for itself in terms of providing Iwusing opportunities for its residents,
opportunities for redevelopment of the dated or underutilized comrrærcial areas and then
try to reconcilE those desires with the ABAG numbers. Task Force members should ask if
providing a variety of housing types is desirable and if Cupertino wants to be part of the
larger state-wide effort to correct the jobsjhousing imbalance. Jurisdictions are subject to
a court challenge if their Housing Elements are not certified by the State and the State
Legislature has repeatedly threatened to institute sanctions for cities that fail to meet
their regional fair share. If you ultimately recomrrænd the Council choose to ignore the
ABAG fair share approach then you should be willing to accept the consequences which
may include fiscal or legal sanctions. Some communities have been threatened with legal
sanctions shutting down their ability to issue building permits of any kind until they
have complied with the State mandate. Usually these suits are brought about by
environmental or affordable housing advocates.
What is the penalty if we don't rneet the ABAG housing numbers?
The State certifies housing elements. If a jurisdiction does not have a certified housing
element, it is subject to a court challEnge, and development activity could be shut down
until the element is certified. In recent years, state lEgislators have proposed fiscal
penalties, but none has been adopted.
5,000 housing units adds how many people?
The draft General Plan proposes an additional 2,300 units over the current General Plan.
This represents a total of approximately 3,800 units (not 5,000) aver what is either built
or currently appraved (plEase refer to the Development Allocation Table for a full
19
reporting of the housing and non-housing development numbers). The 2000 Census
reports 2.83 persons per household. Based on this number, 3,800 additional housing
units results in 10,750 people. The household size is significantly lower for modErate
density apartments or townhomes consequently the total population increase may
approximate 2.0-2.5 persons per unit resulting in between 7,600 to 9,500 additional
residEnts from the addEd predominately non-single family housing units. The Census
reports Cupertino's 2000 population as 50,546.
Senior Housing: How are we encouraging the development
of senior housing to include graduated/ assisted care, as well
as it being affordable, independent living?
The draft General Plan Policy 3-3 calls for a range of housing types and affordJ;¡ble levels.
It allows for a range of dEnsities. The higher dEnsity apartments or condominiums that
are allowed would offer affordabiIity, security and ease of maintenance to seniors. New
assisted care developments would be allowed through the rezoning and use permit
process. The General Plan supports fedEral funding sources that can be used to support
senior housing.
. Proposed Housing Project at Villa Serra: number of current
apartments, number of proposed condominiums, what arrangements
to retain current professional residents, what arrangements for
children who attend Garden Gates to still do so, what is height and
how will buildings look compared to the surroundings? What is the
approximate cost.
The current proposal is to remove 194 units and construct 542 new units for an increase
of 348 units. The units will most likely be "for rent" condominiums. Since the
application is on hold, the applicant has not addressed relocation benefits of any of the
tenants. Professional residEnts will receive the same benefits as all the other tenants. The
applicant has not addressed allowing children to continue with school districts as of yet
either. This will be discussed during the public hearing process. Building heights will be
approximately 58-60 feet. Cost information is not available at this time.
What can we done to encourage large, under-occupied
single family homes in the City to be better utilized by
encouraging renting out rooms - fewer restrictions should
apply!
Cupertino does not actively encourage renting out rooms in homes, but there is very little
restricting someone from doing so. Building codEs limit occupancy, but they are fairly
generous. The zoning code allows up to 10 people for shared, non-transient occupancy
(see definition for congregate residence). The number of cars parked on a property is
limited. The Senior Center posts requests for tenants on bulletin boards for seniors.
20
. Forced Development vs. Jobs/Housing Imbalance: If jobs are not there
we won't need more homes. Number of employed people has shrink
in the current economic downturn, so has the number of ABAG
required number of units been reduced?
The ABAG housing projections were based on "Projections 2000," which did not reflect a
downturn in the economy. "Projections 2003" shows a downturn for Cupertino between
2000 and 2005, and an upturn by 2010. The current ABAG housing requirements are
for the 2000-2006 time period; we won't know until the time period is over what formula
will be used for their next "Housing Distribution Model."
TRAFFIC
. Traffic at Valko - how will the revitalization of Valko and the HP
property not cause a traffic nightmare?
New tenants in existing buildings at Vallco will not trigger any traffic review at least
through the effective period for the current development agreement (2006). If new
construction is proposed, then traffic analysis will be required prior to approval. New
development on the HP property will also require traffic analysis. Also, Wolfe Road was
significantly overbuilt (8-9 lanes wide at different points) anticipating a successful
Vallco Fashion Park. The Task Force should evaluate if you are willing to absorb some
added congestion in the interest of having a vibrant center. Alternatively, you may
decide to recommend the City reduce the allowed building square footage and severely
restrict the types of uses in Vallco upon expiration of the development agreement to
ensure traffic is not congested. This approach would be at the expense of significant
revenues that such a vibrant center could generate.
. How feasible is it to narrow Stevens Creek street?
A study to evaluate the feasibility of reducing the number of lanes from 6 lanes to four
lanes on Stevens Creek Boulevard was recommended as a part of the proposed Crossroads
Streetscape Plan and then deleted from the plan because many persons questioned the
feasibility of reducing the number of lanes and the effect on the speed and level of service
through this area. The concept is to evaluate if Cupertino can reclaim a portion of
Stevens Creek Boulevard as a community street and not a high-speed through access to
the freeway. Cities such as Los Gatos, Saratoga and Los Altos limit the width of streets
to retain the local suburban feel of their communities. Cupertino should evaluate if a
four-lane option on Stevens Creek Boulevard better reflects the communities desire to be
predominately suburban. The Crossroads Streetscape plan ultimately recommended the
provision of on-street parking while retaining the six through lanes similar to the front of
Anderson Chevrolet, .to provide on-street parking for that business.
21
FISCAL
If we reduce the commercial and office space and add more housing,
what effect will it have on the revenues?
Reducing the potential for commercial and office might not have any effect on revenues,
since the market has not built out to the potential in the past. However, if they were built
out to their potential, it is possible that sales and use tax potential would be reduced. On
the other hand, if outdated, commercial areas were replaced with residential or mixed
uses, the loss of commercial uses might be more than compensated by increased property
values and the perception of Cupertino as a vital city, which in turn attracts new
business.
What is the cost per person for services?
Attached is a cost/revenue analysis for the Garden Gate, Monta Vista and Rancho
Rinconada areas done in 1997. At that time, the costs per person were:
Garden Gate: costs of approximately $9 per person per year, Monta Vista: revenue of
approximately $43 per person per year and Rancho Rinconada: costs of approximately
$13 per person per year, or an average cost of approximately $5 per person per year.
Proposed higher density in fill development might be a "wash" since infrastructure is in
place and there is a reduced need for code enforcement.
Staff is working on providing additional information on this question.
If there's an increase in population, how will the City be able
to provide for all of the infrastructure that's affected, e.g.,
sewer system, water use?
The Environmental Impact Report for the draft General Plan will analyze impacts on
infrastructure. This will be available when the draft is set for public hearings. New
development is required to mitigate their impacts and upgrade infrastructure.
Why are the shopping areas going downhill?
Several reasons. One is that the long time owners are getting enough cash flow off the
property and don't want to bother with renovations/redevelopment of their areas. As the
areas decline, the tenants leave to find nicer, more upscale retail centers so they can
attract customers. The market is changing for Cupertino and many Bay Area
communities away from the marginal strip centers into larger central shopping places
such as Valley Fair, Santana Rowand Downtown Los Gatos. Cupertino must evaluate if
it wants to stick with the predominately strip approach or allow consolidation in Vallco,
and Crossroads/City Center.
How much sales tax comes to Cupertino?
22
33.4% or $10,400,00 of Cupertino's 2003-2004 general fund revenues is expected to
come from sales tax.
SCHOOLS
What role can the city play in addressing the school revenue formula
from the state?
The city does not have a role of play. This is between the State and the schools.
Location for housing development: Have other under/undeveloped
sites been researched in Cupertino? Especially where school
attendance quotas have not bee filled yet! And traffic congestion is not
horrendous?
This can be inserted as a criterion for determining appropriate locations for new
residential development in the General Plan. However, school attendance impacts are
difficult to predict and most of the new development is anticipated in the Heart of the
City area where capacity seems to be freed up with the planned conversion of Collins to a
middle sc/rool.
PUBLIC SERVICES
MISCELLEANOUS
How will the plan focus on the needs of children and their variety
of ages? Parks and recreation.
The parks and recreation policies are found in the Land Use/Community Design element
of the draft General Plan (pages 2-55 to 2-75). The policies are general and do not
specifically address needs by age group. We will have a presentation by Cupertino's Park
and Recreation Director during the "Sustainability" Task Force meeting.
What has happened since the last plan? Was it successful? Was it
followed?
Several references were made in the Task Force presentations to indicate to what degree
the 1993 General Plan was implemented. The Development Potential table shows the
amount of commercial, office, /rotel and residential development allowed in the 1993
General Plan and how much was actually built. The Housing Element Technical
Appendix reports that 140 Below Market Rate units were constructed; 150 units were
projected. Cupertino's traffic consultant reported at the first Task Force meeting that
23
the traffic Level of Service has not gone below Cupertino's standard of LOS D (see figure
4-0 in draft General Plan).
Operational question that do not directly relate to general plan policy. Please contact the
individual staff members on the front page of this document if you wish to pursue any of
these questions.
1. Can you have a special I-day traffic cop to help with traffic when the school
opens on the first day?
2. Do you take care of the San Tomas Streamside Trail? (Bike and walking trail
between Lawrence and Saratoga Creek) Great job! It is very popular! Will it
connect to a trail network? How?
3. What about turning lanes for bikes? What about reflector bumps on outside of
bike lanes? Light sensors in bike lanes? Why don't we do speed traps?
4. Why is there a sign on De Anza Blvd. near Hwy 85 as you go North that says that
De Anza will be subject to delays from July through December?
5. How are traffic signal timings monitored/regulated?
6. Does Public Works have a City Arborist? Evaluate city tree health - when to
pnme? Who does tree trimming? Public Works or owners? Large trees obscure
street lighting, signs, become safety hazards for low branches or broken branche.
7. Does Public Works still think "blinking red light ok to turn left' a good idea?
Seems dangerous.
8. Pedestrians are hindered by interrupted/missing sidewalks in many high traffic
areas, including near our schools. (McClellan east of Stelling, McClellan west of
Monta Vista HS). Can improvements be made here without waiting for property
owners to generally upgrade the properties?
9. Why are we not coordinating lights on Stevens Creek so that Cupertino residents
don't have to stop at every single light in order to make a short shopping trip?
10. Why isn't there synchrony of lights on Stevens Creek (between Monta Vista and
Tantau)? It makes no sense to have all cars stopping at nearly every block!
Causes more asbestos and fumes in the air and frustration oflocal drivers!
11. How much does it cost the city to paint crosswalks red?
12. Is there a system for regular inspections by the Fire Department for fire
detectors in residential permits?
G:planning/ genplan/ task force/ task force questions
24
CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN TASK FORCE
GUIDED AND SELF-GUIDED TOURS
~ ~'.
~"'I
~, ' ...~
~"" '~. i.I',
, -----.'" '.~ > ~
.,.-""," ~"','"".""".,."!"~",.,.,,.1-C, ,,1,\,',),.,.,.,1, " ','
~_:'.' ,.,'
I' "
î1~,
~:..
1'{fott"" ~
'-':."
'..
~
Oft Of
CUPEl(flNO
IN THIS DOCUMENT
1 INTRODUCTION
2 GUIDED TOUR
3 SELF-GUIDED TOUR
4 WEB TOUR
1
3
18
33
The purpose of this tour book is to showcase examples of planning and development in
Cupertino and nearby cities that reflect the Vision and Guiding Principles in the draft
General Plan, particularly connectivity; mobility; a balanced community; and vibrant mixed.
use businesses and "Heart of the City." Other sources provided to the Task Force support
these same notions, such as Smart Growth, the Ahwahnee Principles, Coogress for New
Urbanism, Valley Transportation Authority and others.
Park Place . . .
Mountain View
The Crossings Mountain . . .
View
933.935 Villa Street . . .
Mountain View
348.364 Bryant Street . . .
Mountain View
939 W. Dana Street . . .
Mountain View
View Street . . .
Mountain View
Cœur de La Ville . .
Los Altos
Miramonte Townhomes . . .
Mountain View
The Gateway . . .
Campbell
Fremont Avenue . .
Los Altos
Downtown . . .
Los Gates
Willow Glen . . .
San Jose
Hamptons .
Cupertino
Arioso Apartments .
Cupertino
Astoria Townhomes . . .
Cupertino
Orchard Grove .
Campbell
Ainsley Square .
Campbell
Tra Vigne . .
Cu ertino
Stevens Creek Village . .
Cupertino
21672 Granada Avenue . .
Cupertino
College Villas .
Cu ertino
Campo de Lozano . .
Cu ertino
Orion Lane/Wallin Court . . .
Cu ertino
Cupertino Community . .
Services
Cu ertino
Baker Park .
San Jose
City Center Plaza . . .
Redwood City
Rivermark . . .
Santa Clara
Santana Row . .
San Jose
Orenco Station . .
Portland
4
INTRODUCTION
'.. "" ---""""""'ð." ~-" 'I ',-....--...," ,. ," "~'" "-"~' ','
j /1 I""~'-""r"" (t" -""':"-~ /1 II -'~-- i/ ,.'l l '('x~', ~
// Ii ""~,:'.'~fl1l~ /f"":;:---J/ 1/ /~"{ // I/f" "'"j':¡o. uv ,.,~
i.~-,... ,f J!fr.~:::'"::J' 81'...-/ Ì;,:::.::::J/ I~/'" t/f,/,l{f':;'/.~ ~}~~"A -~>-to~"'~
~ ~-~i>~~{~~ .f//'::;:'~?~ ;'¡J/~ /j't:.' :,4~~,~7 '~þ:: ~ ~~,~:,~..~{f~)~;:~~
>~~ q,fl,/i ~~, ~ /1 (j/"il/!. t.l: /. lll;:,,-/ // ì ""-':::':">'181 ---::"-:;
<'~~"~ .(\.// v/r'~:-i/ ;.:.$'" /,r-:::::--..// / //ì -,.,f... Ii ,/ ~"ì'~.,-:...,-
,'-~W." ,~--", '~,.....' ", """"'"
/ír<~y~</;t //:17/' ,::....{/ ;) r-:::¡il¡J¡ tìr~Æ ,~~.l~¡~:.::,:\
r-ê:) // Itr~:)( ".I 1/ !Ír--"::;,::- I 1/ /./=¡--:.~.</ // ~1~<." "
/1 Ç:_'( sl.l ¡'~t"""'-~,.I.....,...",..¡,':,...".,. Y' ~t-I......,.....,,'...."',',i""-.-,.,-,',,""".......:....-.:,'.-,'..',.i."I...". (1/;' I/!""""'::~'--,i -$. 1/ -'-~~ "St
j ";.",~-:.~~ ¡i 1#Jj"""'! /':,,:,""'."-'~- /'/ /l,,/ ),'-':>lIi/.. """-'~-:::.~
::::~,.../' ~\/::~':~~~ : .,,;;;iffj.;,{-, i,19r-,Øer,.. ~ }:!.IJ~/' ..// ~,l~'::':--~~~ ~-~
""'~~~-" /I ? /-<::::: ,.,.:"..."E.:~ Ie.'.".,:.".""','.:.."...''...,::i". ,~m.. 0,' r,.I.p,...,J.. .,',' r b'astf.tl-:S.!--././ /i-':~ Y.&t~'--Æl
--'>-l( /1 Þ .."'.',p..,.a.......r..;.....'"..' <1/"-,...... Park..., " ..r' Y' '-', .'._~ I/~~/,-'::;::':'_(f~~ ",-,~-.-
'x...;.,.'l -, : :11.~,;.r --,' t / l' "--:-'-/( ~ :;:::.,,-.-...W /-'
,~ì,' ,'-""...." 'I' ,-- -, I I,. / <., ,.--~ ~ ~~"I"
-... ;: .. -""..;:--- , ..... t '/ ' // -"",
=, '~'x I"l~:;"---//. ì-;;.!; ,-",,~~. /¡ 1/ // A,'"Î"j~~Cÿli
~, '~ ' ) '" /1"'" ...~ '¡, // /i l - """'.::-'-..J~
:::;::. "-;'~i( n'-':':-"~;fa",.. -"':::.:.-;::...,-- .s¡¿;-'::::::,::j/ I~'/ ,( --...::.~,!!ì¡l""-:::::'
:5 ~~~ C, ìF!51rv:~r#ii.~f1§¡£~
rood ~11 '\-;:~~ "'-~r.../:t1::,.... --'~,J.. I.......~ .....~.t5;;;~.,~/! ¿r-..;.,--
J ~:<.\ Jt'-~--?l#l~ /.... ?f1w );:::~q#::--,~ I.F
~, " ',', , ¡ -,;:-, 1'1 .~
--- , )') c3' ï "~....I ""-"'" ":', ,I ll~~"::::::"-
if ,,' -,../ ~ ~t..}.":....... l! 2//"-::::::. .;;1;-....,/-"":::::.-:::,.V) /...) /01/ -":::'~:-... -,..::
, !'IV' ""~l /.. ""'... '""",,-
x ~( "'....., I' "II '..~-...""
¡~/ I B ~!r];::;¡ì/ /fI' "'fi~~:~// jl~~~~i ¿,~
-----'1 - i"'"'- i oJ Il \~ 1::/-..:",>-... ""..>~-~
----'\ \ I ~' ø.... / ; / 1;]3 I """":' / '-:::::-....vr
\\ I. 1/ cl ~ ""'-:-"_,Q)I...>- '-;-".'-
~ , ~JJU~J\ì 1 \11" "iiQ).r(:':::-;:,>~i"'~ ~,~~/<
,~ f1! l " m I.:{ II ~ I ~::~I/
[ ~ ...... j) ,.. ,'..11' U ~ c', -, ',.
..
N
Park Place, Mountain View
Development Statistics
Residential
Unit Type
1-Bedroom
2-Bedroom
3-Bedroom
Total
Number
64
56
Size
120
89,160 sf
3.2 acres
37.7 du/acre
1.2 spaces/unit
1/220 sf comm.
Site area (acres)
Residential Density
Site Parking
Commercial Space
Size
Use
7,050 sf total Restaurant, Personal Services
Development Analysis
. Combines retail with residential uses well and has a
strong street presence.
. Commercial spaces occupied by successful
food/services uses.
. Development blends well with other phases of
development and downtown context.
PI
.-
ø
6
GENERALPLANGUIDEDTOUR
n
n
The Crossings,
Mountain View
Showers Drive
Development Statistics
Residential
Unit Type Number
Single Family 102
Townhouses 33
Row Houses 99
Condominiums 128
Total 359
Site area (acres) 7.5 acres
.200 Caltrain spaces in underground garage can also be
used by residences at night.
Commercial Space
Size
Du/ Acre
11
33
38
70
Parking/unit
2.7
1.0
1.8
1.0.
Use
2,000 sf Restaurant, Personal Services
Development Analysts
. Transit-oriented development with easy access to
Caltrain and VTA buses.
. New Urbanist design with mix of housing types,
emphasis on a strong sense of neighborhood and street
presence.
. Garages are located to rear of lot or units have alley
access for parking.
,.~~~~~~èr;;~::;~~if[sfu~~ '
',tU
,->
;¡¡¡
, lIe
-il
' ,(~
i~
.',,",
~
N
.»" <""",~:~,:,,;;
if -:ì.;.~'"~~,,,,\
-F,~""" ""~""'CI....
'/1/ "~~'.. '~,';:":,,~\~~
..// ">~ ...",~
L~' ~l~~{;\"'~:::~~~\~~:~,
í>, 7J;-~ ,'" ,0 '"";,,,,<.
(~~'<.1: ' "::':
'\, -".:,:i,,~'
'~,
\
\~ ::"'~~
,',
G E N ERA LP LANGUID ED TOU R
7
933-935 Villa Street
Mountain View
Developrnent Statistics
Residential
Units
Site area (acres)
Residential Density
Site Parking
20 units
20,500 sf
38 du/acre
2.3 spaces/unit
Developrnent Analysis
. Development blends well into downtown context.
. Residential entries have a strong presence on
street.
BRYANT STREET
8
GENERALPLANGUIDEDTOUR
t;j
UJ
'"
f-
'"
:3
...J
:>
348-364 Bryant Street,
Mountain View
Development Statistics
Residential
Units
Site area
Residential Density
Site Parking
20 units
22,500 sf
38 du/acre
2.3 spaces/unit
Devetopment Analysts
. Example of townhomes in a downtown setting.
...'
f,
'i ',', "..'~"~ '!'I¡, I: ',-- ,r '-0-'"",= //
" II,,' ,', ' ~~,~,-':~b\:.:.~~j(21J" J ,!-~', ;.4~"",',.J,I!'lC)~3 /.;-(..,
:;>"¡"'"i;: """;;¡~if ~""~~:lr",~' :,,' '"":;~":.
, I,'! '¡:<, ""',;::<"1(,, <;,.// 'i'10'~',," C,,"'-
If '"f, ">:" ,,<, ..." ',' ~l "'~',-"
!¿'?,;:~ß ?;"'" ~,'~ r , /,"'."",J ~ "'!>~""
If-' "// 1/ ì,ì;o", /i . >~- r, -...."",!
?-",'¡J,~,~'- 'ii,.." ¡,:::¡ )~~./I ~" '7<.><' & f ,',/>
"",-,'N! -,' "-,",, ,f ¡",,~ r 1ot.;1 ¡""9J" ";
","'<" c.,~, .. ,,',...--..,J/ , íI",;"!"::::;""'~, '/ !f","""'" ", " (j Ii
,~, ";"¡!""~',/'/I'~:""~",v II
'l "";'. " '¡'~I', il ~¡r~~," /', ~"'"
/1 ,/~>" $,'lljlf¿;"'..'.-.fi!/i:¡J i'l~, ,"
"",/.!>,",//"/!"..I(I,~,ì(r/¿i/~~,, ig¿r ~, "~"",,,.,.
( ::> '~;:~iÌJ~t~"{-;'~~~~2f;Y;~~:£..:~""~",,,-:
"',',/ (II li-'!i~ !, /<,,-,~:/.¡A;-#/.I /;7;"-':, '
/?" }~å.j7 7<~ò,,(i:~)';!fi ~$~?i~;J"\';'é
:""',"',',*"'", /i, i1,",,"""",', I,', ». ;/1,/,"'1", ,,-,:,', ",,~/ ,~,'" """"//
;;{;i~~t'l '(ð~' :,,>¿:;~r?;r:;~j~~~;~)~i
':~\{-I: "1¡o,"::ft'~""""" II 4«:~,/" ,/ ,J ~~';~)'"s} i
,',', ,"- "'-. ,,: 1,,'4 ,'. ,'1',"-, ---"""" ""'-,,",'
~.J[~Ìil.I. ',"" "~J'" """ "1f.. '"J. If )""",,)ii' ..,.,,:
~~ :~::t)~8':~~: ');~~:jX ~ ~~:~~~~t~ ~¡ 1~~;':.~~:
.
N
GENERALPLANGUIDEDTOUR
9
939 W. Dana Street,
Mountain View
Development Statistics
Residential
Units
Site area
Residential Density
Site Parking
8 units
11,250 sf
30 du/acre
2.5 spaces/unit
Development Analysis
. Example of town homes in a downtown setting.
~,
.'" "~"-'"
~~."". ~¿?'/ . "-.
!ï"> ~'>f';:;;;'~~,.~,"";",., ..,.....,...,.,'~",.,."..","~
, '~""y!, "f,..r.." ..r;.~.'.',~';',',""
\-.~- .,.."; r""'-'
. ..L ,ii' ¡W';'~~~~r rø
!t I
~
II
--
10
GENERALPLANGUIDEDTOUR
View St.
Mountain View
Units
Site area
Residential Density
Site Parking
Development Analysts
7 units
28,500 sf
11 du/acre
2.5 spaces/unit
Development Statistics
Residential
. Development blends well with downtown
neighborhoods.
. Residential entries have a strong presence on street.
. Garages are located to rear of lot.
--
GENERALPLANGUIDEDTOUR
11
Coeur de la Ville, Los Altos
Second Street
Development Statistics
Residential
Units
Residential Density
12 units
39.6 du/acre
Development Analysis
.
.
In the downtown.
Includes two below market rate units.
":;7( '" \\ W. Edith \\ \:::--":""\f"':
\, :, \~\ \\ \\ I
\:-, "~\ \\ \\ ' \
\\ , \\,~\ \\~ i I
\\ c¡;.. \\, \\ \~~jJ
\~, ,¡j:~,/? \\ '.,:., ')\..;//
,~, '$i.V// \\ \\ //'\'\,
,,¡,~~://, \\ \\ ",,-.;/ \,<;:
\< \\ \\ /';/ ,//
~, \~ S\.;::,/ /;:-"\'\'
\\ \;: /:",,~, \ /.// \
,\ ~\ , ~,~/ '~,,:;:/' : \
\. '&.~" / ....- , ( /1
\\ ~ ,,/ ç,~"/;.~\\ /f
\~\ /Pj¡.\ /;/ \~~'\./-:,;I
"\y /;:Y \~.:-/ ~\./y:;;/ ,...;;
, "f. ,>,~ ~'II:" " \\ //
\, \~ /:/\ .~ ;:;-:::-/ \.;\ /;:-
\;\ /,;/ \~ ;.;~;/
\:'v~/ ",;:,\\ ///'\-,
\~\ /;:;;:/ \..\. ,.;.:;;;;:/ ';;\,;...->
\~\v\....;/ ~~~!:( \I~;;:;;'/\\,
\", /'./ \.\ .~</ ",
\\ /./" \'!i?f:f'.?/ '<,
\, \~v». /) ;:..- .
~\.,;:,-..,\ /~;/.,,\\
'\:-;:;::/ \~:-;;;;,/ \~\
" '\ \ \ '- \
).\ C!l2002 N<lvI¡¡àionT-lIi.. ,~",""T"ÇHI
\<
\
\~.,
~ø*,1
I1200SYlhootho:=:;::::;:', .
12
GEN ERALPLANGUIDEDTOU R
....
N
Miramonte Townhomes,
Mountain View
Development Statistics
Site area
Site Parking
Residential
1.83 acres
145 total
Units
Residential Density
21 units
21 du/acre
Commen;j¡ 1 Space
Size
27,300 sf
Development Analysis
. Example of mixed-use commercial and residential
project on a busy street lEI Camino Real).
Use
Office
-~
-
r-~
G ENE RALP LANG UID ED TOU R
13
The Gateway, Campbell
Development Statistics
Site area 0.74 acres
Site Parking 1 space/unit
(non-dedicated with commercial parking available in
the off hours).
Residential
Units
Residential Density
20 units
27 du/acre
Commercial Space
Size
Use
Retail, restaurant, office
Development Analysis
. Example of mixed-use in a downtown context.
14
GEN ERALPLANGUIDEDTOU R
Downtown, Los Gatos
~~/:1< ,'" i{~:::.;i/~Ælkp<.i//I/ ¡! 7
;;~;,f;:>'" Y:,Y"z,;:;:,'~,'Í,,/i"fl1~, ,I"i;,":,ié,,'~-~'!<',cd1J¡1,¡ i( ,,--"
'<":( '/1 ìt~i!'f!1 .f, ,.~c, I", '"J 'Ii
"':,:" I! I! l3it ":~/"">\\ (,-~ "", II
"",' ,'/, .,~~~! Ii ,',/.#/1 ,j(r..!!... ~,~ ij
'/" " ~.'. ' -'I ,,"-=--~'" ¡,-co l',
y /"'-Vt' ¿"". ~//:il:1/ /3c~'~=l' "
"{i"" I~,,~, ,"o'o--Sf
",Y"')~"í':::'~,"'" ,i,i,I,!',"""""
,-, /' ',,'¡' '" "I"
é'::~:" ','II/,I')~ 1:, "":'!,.Jc^.,' li,/i,,/I:'!" n
", , ,!"I';ç~ ""'!I!t""!NT.'l /:.' )'r
Ä'>'/<rl/ /"'1...,,)/,,/ ì;',J,c;;/ ~['I,(
, I(~;:;-'~;;:",¡: j>Ì'}¡JCJ 1/ ""~., i'~ \/
",,'I'(~I,~,/ /¡ï I!",~',,"'~' !',(,',\~,',í,"", ,""',' ~!c>,'" ,," I'", ',~}
'&'\ iT'I'.;;i'"""".'" '" I",
,Ail: ii }:.r,~.iÍ lfir~~:~tt,/' I' '/{",Io<
>,""""{ 11/',7,~"",,~I¡ 11.l'/' "il .,.,-,l' ,¡f',"1'-
".<5",...~li I¡ ""/, ¡'~""";,-.', "¿>"' Ø,¡"
"2, ;':::",'!!/ "Ji";.! ...;".. "j."",'t:-/.. .s"
, I' " 't';'"", ¿"""y, ,f/'"
,~:~g~~!t~~"":~: i¡'~:~~~5d~
\'~) ~¿J'J¡'" ,e~¡ Il1,,///~~)..
\ ~, ~l' '~~~(~~~~:~~~¡~:;\:¿\
Development Analysis
. While Cupertino does not expect to have a
downtown like Los Gates, this example does how
how residential can be located above retail and
restaurant uses.
.....
N
GE NERALPLANGUIDEDTOU R
15
Fremont Avenue, Los Altos
Development Analysis
. Example of traffic calming
. Wide street was modified with a landscaped median
~r'..,~~mlOir
~filflJ ')~ n~ n -
~'JJ IL~~~,~ IJ!¡ f'1
..:;~~, M elAve ... :J ~ I \1 \ ~ i \r~ [
/~".', " ,-¡ « ~ Iii '" I,
,1/ ¿~~~~~ito Av~¿Lcc. on KIf!¡ St ,OO~ L, If . J 'L \,- l,
/~""~~ I) « r 'r"'==
.// o~ 1- Merta v
,~::;/ c'", ","". ~-~ G" ' ' n~o,.. '---', r-o-.,~ e -
:/ ,'v,^,.~" ¡ ... ' /", /~,
.j' ))~,~'" ,----' So I (..' ,.-j" /;<
~ /,.~~~ --¡!ll /-/ //~..
~~,i.)1 ?,4";,» ~)~~"'",~, ~,\v.~.:,<::...::¡-<// ~, ~ Ul
- --:r;.% ~ (I' /~/~~', ----1 .. ,.: ),-:c¡. . -g
,;.' ') /1' ,,!) ,,;----\ / " >--' -
;=::"~' f/ n - <: >'<::~O:~L ,f'HoftAve I ;¡¡:
,.k cf ð',,) V'<:::'~/'l,:::., \'-::.~ ~!f--~il-
'~::.':.~, <i;!-~:)ð>?:) c:j) ~(~\ "," n! ~ )J~~> ¿;;
~.~~ ~~rst'!r;/ '::::,"-;~.'.',.- '+, \Z~?,' ,,;:~.J .. .,/;~)}~¡; /,f,'~-f>;.;::'l~
:::~¡Jf '~"" 1,lt{f/:,.~~~~~'~\ "."~ < ~;/ ~~;< ~/11
:::;<f/! j¡ III "ì', -'\\ \\.!?~.';'~".,t.. " ':"7 æ-:;-' \\
I I ¡ , '-< ,\~- ",x'" -- / / ~
-'~¡~~,I¡L==:!.L.$t ~,._--- ~;$ "'; ~,-,(..~~:/ /;r-"
, .. '0 1,Q!:1O if - ,~~-" ," ..'ð;;...... ""V-/ . ' N
8m) VallMl"'-¡<=:::.:-, 'ìr--' 81tG2 NavIptiMI TH/IIIIIoaiH '~","""TEC;H¡
16
GEN ERALPLANGUIDEDTOU R
Willow Glen, San Jose
Development Analysts
. Four lane road that functions successfully as a
downtown.
",:::-
~
~oq!¥:>' ~( ,:;;-::O<\:,f"~\,~;f~~~~'\ ,,)/ II
,'j""'" \>~ ,"',' \\ ""/., , ~,,( \',"""t", \V/ ,Y'
/i /C:;/,...p/;:/\\ "\/.,/'" \\ 4~\' .,.
,7",\-",~/ ~,\">Y ~ <¡,' //':' \" \\ ,~~.;;~~//
~C><\ ~/;/> ~/?,\ -?[-':,,'\, .~~, '}~/;;:::~¿~'" _.~{
':"\,\':>¿:" (;/~!¥~;/~~' \\ .~, ,,"\~ \%.~, ,<-~""', \\, '\, ,~~
\::~ \:::~9-: \~;:;;-'::')~:;?-'\\ \:\,'~~ "~"%:'\'~~::~~':':>~. ',~'.><?~
z', \:~ "f-,~ ~,' ,,;;/,\\ \\ \;.. ~ ~ \\p '\....ð '<, :1t.;:.-~ ~,
',\ \\!J. '\~-'\" ". ~e \\ \\"~ "~ ,\:,1'.. ':;' "~",, \.\'
\:.. '\~;::,."""1 '\,\ \:'M.\""I",/;:::::, """ ~ 'f~;:-~.~ '~..'liJ/ '\.'~<;> '...\,
,,',//,\ \\ '.t.r,\Ø'""-/--' ,\ .., "'( '" .~y ~-:1\:'
)V¡:'~ \\ , \\ JT:.-!,~C-,:-/ , /;:;:\~, , \~,~.. ¿.':~, "'-y;:-'\, ':;'~ ':
'\\ \\ \, '¡'(-'" ~\e \,/í' ~; \;., ":\Y'..),\ ~"~""
\'<'" \\ ¡,~~'<~" /,,~ /\ \', ,>~~~:/ '\), C:\'-.. ---;'-',
" \\\\<,;:~~'.o:::-:-"'" \~~~::.;~, "\\",~~~,,, :>J /,:,,:,~:<:.,:~ /
~'~,.J.'~\:\~, ~:::,/ \~ ~.{f ~}'\\..,[ ,<-:X:~5-~""
,\ '...~\\ \, /;." .';""~ '/.' A,,\"",.=~/_OR.~:/ ,-
""', I," 'Ò.,\ " , "/',,",~' "'-/"~,'~'" ~, "":// ,~"
'~\ \., \,\ C/\., /./ '~r¿ ----,:':/ \-\';~~/f" ~f;-:;'
Þ~"'.!!~:'\', ',:\" /;::"<.}.\, '~" '(/ /? "'>,~..-:';\,
-, ' /.. '" ',' /.,/ ?V, j
=-~\ :",--::c-::=-.;;~-~;{, \P ,,),:;ij'? ,/;:/þ."~"1"
----'¡fir - l.,1 '\~~, 9 \~\.,-7:' ..,,:~-:::,;,<if~::'\'~, ',-
-' \,'0 Y Y:::':"~' ," r/. ',v'."
="",::J~, i\ 1'1, ""', ",N;eI=,IE!!,:f-,r \\~"~/""",,-'o,,>\\
¡;¡. ',\1'. /.' ",// /~/ /' ,--=./ /",,"
=""-11,' g, I,i, \~:/ \(.-:-:<..;:;/\ ,/'::':;~: \\ "
j. 1::: " ò1""-~\ ,,:;:'?¡/ \&::;:,c'Ó-;i, \\\\\
:::-=.1 Ii ~1tI'!:../". \<';;"f',,/'/ /::;.:\7". ):-:::';:~ "~~
i "",,\\ /~\V',"/ -ú...- ' --c.--- \'
1\ \ , - ,vc:",:;"',~,\,~, .""" \\:;:,~,/ -, ~/.." \':~,,~c~~-- , ,_..;:.:~~
---' , ",,-,r I":':"':'~ ,:~"~"'"I-:::,:'-"è\\ ~-;:::~. 1",,-¡
~~==1=1 ="\\, \',\1I ',¿'::~"'\\~>::~xe~::~-~';;;/ e'.,e):,/\"
It '1*,':, -',/"",-,.":,, .', ",'1/,,' ...-
~
N
GENERALPLANGUIDEDTOUR
17
r
, ¡-::::/
/'-~à> d
> .-'
-; bŒJ
¡ì,'
.
N
18
GE NERALPLANGUlDEDTOU R
Hamptons, Cupertino
N. Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Avenue
Development Statistics
Resldenttal
Units
Site area
Residential Density
Site Parking
342 units
13.4 acres (gross)
25.5 du/gr.acre
1.96 spaces/unit
Development Analysis
. Note the large lawn area, which gæined park credits for
the developer.
-."....- ..."~
GE N E RALP LA NSELF-GUIDED TO U R
19
Development Analysis
. Example of newer apartments in Cupertino.
201 units
7.01 acres (gross)
28.7 du/gr.acre
2 spaces/unit
Arioso, Cupertino
N. Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Avenue (behind Hilton
Garden Inn)
Development Statistics
Residential
Units
Site area (acres)
ResidentiaL Density
Site Parking
,
"
IJ'
-_._----------
"ot.,..
1'1°"'0
20
G ENE RALP LAN 5 ELF-GUID ED TO U R
Astoria, Cupertino
ImperiaL Avenue
Development Statistics
Residential
Units
Site area
Residential Density
Site Parking
Development Analysis
. Live/work units along Imperial Avenue.
. Minipark at rear.
. Trail connection through project, connects to McClellan
Road via Honeywell site.
56 units
4.15 acres (gross)
13.5 du/gr.acre
3.17 spaces/unit
-",',
h'__~','
_ON"'"
GENERALPLANS ELF-GUIDEDTOU R
21
Orchard Grove, Campbell
Civic Center Drive and Campbell Avenue
Development Statistics
Residential
Units
Site area
Residential Density
Site Parking
Development Analysis
20 units
1.8 acres (gross)
11 du/gr.acre
3.5 spaces/unit
. Live/work units.
IL"'I'.,, ]~,L,j,_,j,.!-., ¿,L, J~'I(", .,~
-:. ~- E{~:;-~1[-J s~~~tj.=--l-r "
! -, ~!LÆIL~ la'-. .;r :;?=
~ ~~~~fJ'~IF-
It 1,~!O ~ ~R,,~~¡¡~;~1J"" =lLi ír
='-=c='::=~~f lJ'?i~-it;¿ I .J"iO'
'="I~"'v.,! \?Ii, i!j If-::!
ChenyLn,-- ~1f,l I.- "IL
--s¡r¡:,;d8 Ave l:l ¿? ~ r=---
~::3~\:1~j/ ~III-i~
:-,"----1 l ",' , " 1Jmi'i !i~~~~~~b
:=:c:i~ ,f Þ ,:::-=;",- I( ----¡C:;-v <f'f
J:O , I;.' II ,-" '.', ":-, Ë-M!&~" J' "
=l'~ 'I ;l /I <:-k/ \1\"'-;:-------\""';-- .
..4--J~,-:" //' f// ~.-/,;ý~ 1"',/f N
w '1-~lnM. "'// /,-:>'- ---0< d~( ,-'
22
G ENE RALP LA NS ELF-GUlD ED TO U R
Ainsley Square, Campbell
Civic Center Drive and Campbell Avenue
Development Statistics
Residential
Units
Site area
Residential Density
Site Parking
51 units
4,25 acres (gross)
12 du/gr.acre
2.96 spaces/unit
Development Analysis
. Homes have entries and porches fadng the street.
. Development fits well into the downtown context.
Ii, !'~' 1",1,', ',',', i.' J~f~"'='"
I I' "!' ',' ~,=-:>
]c---'----',"'" , ~'--.JL.....', ~, L II ,-'" ~[-
-----" ç--rl!] r;;j :- [J 5- AvO'rc ' ~
! ~ ~i! ~I: ! i'i:r-'jer-"-¡f-
I; Zí:......JI ...JilfúL#-~1
li,rjplnr-,~I, 1/ Ie=] ,I
I~-~~~, nði¡ I
,- --f---;-, DDD~.Jl,iJ1!..- ~
!'-I;l~', ~d!..~ lr:
JLJ~J~I~ If=} ~;¿f;t'l 1/ If,
----¡, ----,¡SIF-7/ .'/' /1 '~, IL_Ji'ii'
=--,~AV'tl ð¡1¡' 'i,ff r=='
Chonylnl~'- '. ,I 1 f L--....
--ši~h'ldeAve ;;J "'/ ¿ ~¡-"
=~;;O=;I1---, 7' -c=~ 0 I
L-.JL-.$"fJ~'----- ~
- d--'rr" i!~',11 I~J
Budd A'.¡ If 'r
~ .~ÿ.~ /i' ,;r~::"J~-dIW~b.#,
1:0 I, ,,',iI /" \\ '~'. ~~If\\\ þ!1
~1\~ ~/!i ,$;1' 1,,\, '}~:r,"'---------'~()' f .....
'" ~,:t/<~'~;::::., - .~" 0< ,':o~f .-- N
f;'
""
~:j=
G ENE RALP LAN 5 ELF-GUID EDTO U R
23
TraVigne, Cupertino
Stevens Creek Boulevard and Blaney Avenue
Development Statistics
Residential
Units
Site area
Residential Density
Site Parking
46 units
2.24 acres (gross)
34 du/gr.acre
110 spaces total for
residential and
commercial uses
(134 spaces
required by code).
Commercial Space
Size
5,355 sf
5,949 sf
Use
Retail
Office
Development Analysis
. Combines retail and office with residential uses and
has a strong street presence.
,"";,'.,;,",,'
"" ,j.':"+;;~¡
..:~~..::- ~,^,,;~.,;.i:ß': ;:"LN:~,t~.,. <:"'~'t.t:ø~:,;~~~!
24
G ENE RALP LA NS ELF-GUIDEDTO U R
ì j¡-
Stevens Creek Village,
Cupertino
Stevens Creek Boulevard and Tantau Avenue
mhO"
-..(j.' 1.
0 '0
4,000 sf
Use
Commerdal
Development Statistics
Residential
Units
Site area
Residential Density
Site Parking
Commerdal Space
Size
40 units
1.36 acres (gross)
29.4 du/gr.acre
1.68 spaces/unit
Development Analysis
. Affordable housint units
. Has a street presence.
. Individual residential entries 01} Stevens Creek
Boulevard could relate better to the street and could
be more in scale with adjacent developments.
aTEVE.a CREEK BlVD,
>
<
"
<
0-
<
0-
í ;,iTlTLUlU
,< "
., ~ .~.. .y...
GE NERALPLANSELF-GUIDEDTOU R
25
21672 Granada Avenue,
Cupertino
Development Statistics
Residential
Unit Type
1-Bedroom
Number
Size
1,044sq.ft.
0.11 acres
9 du/gr. acre
6 spaces provided
for both uses (10
spaces required by
code)
Site area (acres)
Residential Density
Parking
Commercial Space
Size
Use
1,621 sf total Restaurant, Personal Services
Development Analysis
. Mixed-use office and residential.
. The building blends well with the character of
development in Monte Vista.
!
"'-".-=.'-
!
I
¡
!
i
I
!
i
\
L--__-
r..'~
------.
---~_.__..~~~
GR"""" AVE.
26
GE N ERALPLANSELF-GUlD EDTOU R
College Villas, Cupertino
10060 S. Stelling Road
Devetopment Statistics
Residential
Units
Site area
Residential Density
Site Parking
8 units
23,179sq.ft.
11 du/gr. acre
3.4 spaces/unit
Development Analysis
. Units have entries facing the street and garages to
the rear.
I
r
I
I
G E NERALP LANS ELF-GUID EDTO U R
27
Campo de Lozano,
Cupertino
Rodrigues Avenue
Development Statistics
Residential
Units
Site area
Residential Density
Site Parking
Developrnent Analysis
8 units
1.0 acres
8 du/acre
4 spaces/unit
.
Project includes improvements and access to the
Regnart Creek trail.
Rear homes face the creek.
.
- - .-
u..-.
."."
28
GEN ERALP LANSELF-GUlD EDTOU R
Orion Lane/Wallin Court,
Cupertino
Development Statistics
Resfdentlat
Units
Site area
Residential Density
Site Parkin¡
Devetopment Analysis
8 units
3.01 acres
2.65 du/acre
4 spaces/unit
. Homes along Orion Lane relate well to neighborood.
. Trail provided along Regnart Creek, which connects
to Orogrande Place.
. ." ,~~çç"'~,~/ '. '\
,,". ':.If-.'..<.', ~~:::,~.,.".'~,,"~,',',' ... '"
'¡:Rf:¿ :t' ~,~)~ \
. ':~lj.I~.~.; ,!~ '. :~, ""l',t""" '. \
. '~:":'t1,: ~~' . .'" ::'-.l}k'" '~;:':",\ ~ '\
. ! . '. "", I ", '
'."1,"" l:"""""'-'_";;'<"-"
""" '-'~'I'-'I"" "'-' \\'.\ \
,0-
:' ,," ", \\~
;:,:,~e. ! /' ,,',:';:;vo . \"
," " ,,' ~"., : 1',
r.,! .".. l,', ,;',:,
" :l.1.t-~--.--, ,I" '. ---';,,'..-.¡'...._i..' "
,. """'",' I '
GE N ERALP LAN 5 ELF- GUm EDTO U R
29
Cupertino Community
Services, Cupertino
Vista Drive
Units
Site area
Residential Density
Site Parking
Development Analysis
. Affordable housing units.
. Mixture of residential and office (CCS) uses.
24 units
2.2 acres
11 du/acre
1.4 spaces/unit
Development Statistics
Residential
UJ
>
¡¡:
c
~
:>
-'-=....
.: ' .
¡~' .
..1
1\ I
.¡
,-I
30
STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
G ENE RALP LANS ELF-GUID EDTO U R
Baker Park, San Jose
4748 Campbell Avenue and Fallbrook Drive
Development Statistics
Residential
Units
Site area (acres)
Residential Density
Site Parking
98 units
2.9 acres approx.
33.3 du/acre
2.3 spaces/unit
Development J.nalysis
. Adjacent to a park, an elementary school, and a City
community center.
. Buildings have strong presence on street and are
differentiated to add interest to the streetscape.
-7 æli"~<!) .,~~~ I L~"' -
8' ~-fe'\~l<--&- ---.Jr-
/ ~~~ I
~ /< "'Þ-'~P-fr-\\
:=;!!'b... . :;/ ?/-.<,-~/"~'\... c \\
---~. ,,4. / I' /^., ,."-"-
--;; ...t d/"~ //"x "~.
, /J(".1.'.i~f/r\; >~
\....~ I' ' ~.:A.~<~~~' // /rf' .h^'.\
, \~~v:/ ~.,.~I.'--~, ~,-'~~:/ ~~ ~- // /{/', /~1"l
JV,~ '<~... ~j // ~~";':¡;'V-' -/ J
1)"\ ~ \...,~~/ ~~~//H
.' I ,.. EII 1wood Dr ~ /y"f}) ~v:.(
Ç-JJIL' :liJ'g lj..rfJ ,0 //!¿5~. ~~~.f f?r=
- ¡..\!Ii ¡---- ~// l~-- ~~
/>l ' .c !:==.",~ - I ~I
;/ L': 3 j paleo OIiVo!'-] :þ ~~OOd In
I-' ---, , l .. -- ::::¡¡:==)ì
,/;rlC-_=,,_~")'lrli:.=:~~~, " rJuì\T, ~l
' .J JC----.-JL~ a!oknaURd 'L ~LJL
=:=J rJli.. --:=:JilD n¡; NorWI'" C:hWØy~r
~ I~I: ¡¡,il a I Î nr ~L
----¡ : ie;J,\,i¡" , ~ 1\ 1,i1ni IÞF\\f\\
ïl JLJlJ~Ð'-\kJb- ::\! I
,'--...,.. -,.....--.,----""'- ".'[;1 1
Â.
N
G E N ERA LP LANS ELF-GUIDEDTO U R
31
City Center Plaza,
Redwood City
Main Street and Middlefield Road
Development Statistics
Site area (acres)
Residential
1.9 acres
UAits
Residential Density
82 \,IAits
43.2 du/acre
Commercial Space
Size
17,999 sf tatal
Use
RestaHraAt, Retail, (allege
Extension
Development Analysis
.
100 affordable for low and moderate income
residents.
Project includes six live/work lofts.
.
~~' ... (I rl.\
....,. '0 ',"', .:¡. Ii il:.\.-"
, ,~'o,::; h ,; " jrc,,\
S":'( \:\ , f t; IÎ~ , ' '~\:
/"";"", '\ i ,'1;/ ~~ ".ï \
'\\'~"~\ ,/ ir' ~,..,,~ )/ \
, -- o~- .., ¡-;; 'l'
il'I,' l,~,~,r;C=~,-:;"h:V~' ~ ,,' , W
~ J' -..--1 ..../: - /1 -=---~",",
ir.--"l\ -----, ' -~ ""),'-'-" vI
j U lJ ~-" __'LJ L,.-J L..., Z- ~~1 f<
0' OrVT'Î~'1\..-->--l'- ~
] 'UL\l]t::;'.-\\=-"--7"---=-7~"=
Jl]n1~Ùl\ \í~!)ì:~~,,~ ~,i~~~- 9:~[ ,
~-, ",-\",IJII IL,,-~, ,~'I,'~,';I"',',~I }l~, ,J,~/I ,. "í~~/l
... ~ '" '"' "lflW" "<-.. /' it/! I; 'í"
~Y.',', "-",.- ,', f,",:;,"...., "'~,,~~I/ ,r--~~, j(/ 'j J:,!¡
/.^"*'.,~lì,:",/f ,":,"'""./ ; .~ ;5//
.<&Õ'<t,fI' ' ):"",,~'l!rì,...:¡,,;::,;;- ¡;,/ -.:.ii_..j
v~,/}/ 'Iifj'" ../(;i ìr:-'~¿ /l F/.. --":.-;/
~,,',~ÚZ~~,) <,' ,,!I,¥~' ~,I/ì.W/l//'ì¡ / ¡?~
~-( ~"-., ">..' '/"'" '/1"'-'
{)\" - j, ':;, \~ ].),."/f7/#,1~~V(.. íI ;/<}
"',',,~{/, "":-i/...,', 'i~,~\\ J~,"~(.. Ì¡~f!!Ø,)li,~~;¡5, "'-0,/1 It,:':':",,", j,"r
:í"-':-, ~/~" , ?,"~~ ,d"ji"<f: II Æ6> II ",."" ~IÍ /r>-..!.;t, ß
~' >",'>~"'-é.~'f\~"'k", *;£;",'ð, ~-,. ~\_-- /1
,:--"ç,.,-;/~~ ,~> \\/;""";"",II~ -,./-,,:,; ~.
;:"')Y . "~f!-./-;:"~~~: )~.. Ú~'íik~""c "~~;;,,";1
,~ ,10MB -"","'~1).y.:",;t-<,-,--:",,1
...
N
32
G ENE RALP LANS ELF-GUIDEDTO U R
GE NERALPLAN 5 ELF-GUI DEDTOU R
33
Rivermark, Santa Clara
Development Statistics
Site area
152 acres
Residential
Units
1830 for-sale and
rental
Commercial Space
Size
Use
Grocery, Restaurants, Personal
Services
136,000 sf total
Development Analysis
. Traditional neighborhood retail center and a
main street promenade consisting of
housing, shops and restaurants.
. Development includes a fire station, library
and a K-8 school.
. A trail system connects to the Guadalupe
River Trail and pocket parks throughout the
community.
http:/ /www.centexhomes.com/San-Francisco/N44352.asp
http:/ /www.rivermark.net
MASTER SITE PLAN
34
GENERALPLANWEBTOUR
,!i
Santana Row, San Jose
Development Statistics
Site area
Residential
40 acres
Units
1200 rental
Commerdal Space
Size
680,000 sf total
Use
Bookstore, Retail. 213-room
Hotel, Bootiques Restaurants,
6-screen Theater
Development Analysis
. An urban development featuring a
combination of retatl, hotel, theater and
high-end residential. units.
. Main street promenade consisting of
housing, shops and restaurants.
. A trail system connects to the Guadalupe
River Trail and pocket parks throughout the
community.
hUD: / /www.santanarow.com
httD: Ilwww.interlandusa.com/SantanaRow.htm
.
/_;"';¡~'~i
~
/, / t
/, .,lA, ','-,~ .'
'r
' ~ .;.' , I ~
~éìr~Y (C,¡' i
~!';;;" .,~ I
.'t.",' ,"""\1',11
.',' '. ., - ,
. r "-".........1\,
,'iH,~;
II
\ \
i
i,?\~~"" 'l
l!d. ; '. ; ~,,~
;~~'<""-",~" '.: j ',,' ¡
. " I ! f
, ",~..,'~'"
."š,.:i:.!..i~.(".
,'"
/~
,"',,'
, , . '
"a.w~"
GE N ERALP LANS ELF-GUIDED TO U R
35
Downtown, Walnut Creek
The heart of the downtown area is zoned for
pedestrian-retail creating a strong and well
integrated retail core.
The BART station area is zoned for mixed use;
the city encourages high density housing (up to
80 units/acre) and office development here to
promote the use of BART.
The city encourages development of affordable
housing by offering incentives for developers,
A free city-funded shuttle bus transports people
around the downtown area, to the BART station
and to local office parks, in an effort to make
the area accessible without a private
automobile.
The city prepares specific plans for the
downtown area to determine the best use for
an area.
http:/ /www.walnutcreekdowntown.com/index.html
http:/ /www.walnutcreekrealestate.info/dtn.htm
http:/ /windowshopusa.com/
http://www.diablomag.com/0109/feature1c.htm
36
GENERALPLANWEBTOUR
/.:iíiÍ .~ .., "" :1'
"'.' '.'~\k""O1£¡.'I~'\
,.. i :1\ "
::;,¡:"."""""-'~"_:~;(""i!";", :;'
~e="Ii'ì,.I""""'.-~:"
::<.~...: ,f_, ,',nr
W..."UT
caEEK
".."'-
,,-_.
.'-""'-'-""
...............
..."""Y'
Orenco Station, Portland,
OR
Development Statistics
Site area
190 acres
Residential
Units
1400 rental
450 for-sale
Commercial Space
Size
Use
65,000 sf total Retail, Office, Restaurants
Development Analysis
8 Development is adjacent to a light rail stop.
8 The main sUet fs designed with brick
facades, bay wit1dow5 and balconies creating
a strong urban endosure.
8 Homes are closer to the street and feature
detailed Craftsman and English Cottage
exteriors and front porches
8 Recreational areas consist of a large central
park and many pocket parks.
;~; ":;,".,"""'.',"""',""',,',¡"".,""',',.,,,,',""""
;:8, ,";'
, '",..",
" ,.'
- ' ,
, .
I ~: ..,
I ~. ,
",~",,: '>'"
"',~",
,I," ..,. ..
..." I ,~;:,
~'.' "'.'!!lir-\: '. <>".,-;-".';-'.' ,
GE N ERALP LAN 5 ELF-GUID EDTOU R
37
7¡-"":":"~"~'
...
I
Congress for New Urbanism
www.cnu.or~
~
.-
Local Government Commission
www.l~c.or~
38
GENERALPLANWEBTOUR
Prepared by Roger Costa
based on 19 responses.
Cupertino General Plan Task Force Survey
For each of the following items, please rate your personal view ofit's importance to a high quality future for
Cupertino over the next 10 years, and your current level of satisfaction with the associated policies and
strategies outlined in both the pre-task force draft and the subsequent task force recommendations
for the General Plan. There are also two task force evaluation questions.
Note: The importance and satisfaction ratings use a 10-point scale:
1 1 I 1 I
1-------~10
Extremely Extremely
Low High
Please use whole numbers.
Satisfaction
wi initial
Draft
Satisfaction
wlTF
Result
Importance
of
Item
I. Transition of City from suburban to urban 4.61 1 5.51 1 7.51
2. Identity and character of 'downtown' 5.11 I 5.411 7.11
3. Application of mixed-use zoning designations 5.21 I 5.61 I 6.9!
4. Economic health of the City 5.01 1 6.41 I B.BI
5. Dwelling unit cap levels 5.11 I 6.BII 7.BI
6. Residential densities for new developments 4.71 I 6.61 I 7.51
7. Affordable housing 5.01 I 4.61 I 6.41
8. Impact on schools 5.311 6.911 8.11
9. Building heights for new developments 4.911 6.111 7.61
10. Traffic congestion and levels of service 6.21 I 5.811 7.61
II. Traffic safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motor vehicles 5.91 1 5.21 I 7.11
12. Environmental preservation and sustainability 5.71 I 5.81 I 6.1\
13. Health and safety 5.81\ 6.111 6.61
14. Parks and recreation 6.51 I 6.61 I 631
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I
I
15. Overall results of General Plan task force
7.31 I
6.3\ \
9.11
9.31
16. Process for General Plan task force
Other Comments:
Name (optional):
Here are several articles related to the
issues identified during the Task Force
discussions
Newsletters
ATÜcles
Fact Sheets
Reports
Presentations
Guidelines
Model Projects
Local Index ofTrans"
Availability
PaTÜcipation Toolkits
~Wf
Currents
Case Btudies & Fact
Sheets
Funding Opportunities
LInks
W.<I~Prav"nt¡on '
-
Principles I Ahwahnee Principles
Ahwahnee Principles
Preamble:
Existing patterns of urban and suburban development seriously impair our quality of life.
The symptoms are: more congestion and air pollution resulting from our increased
dependence on automobiles, the loss of precious open space, the need for costly
improvements to roads and public services, the inequitable distribution of economic
resources, and the loss of a sense of community. By drawing upon the best from the past
and the present, we can plan communities that will more successfully serve the needs of
those who live and work within them. Such planning should adhere to certain
fundamental principles.
Community Principles:
1. All planning should be in the lorm 01 complete and integrated communities containing
housing, shops, work places, schools, parks and civic laciiities essential to the dally lile
01 the residents.
2. Community size should be designed so that housing, jobs, daily needs and other
activities are within easy walking distance 01 each other.
3. As many activities as possible should be located within easy walking distance 01 transit
stops.
4. A community should contain a diversity 01 housing types to enable citizens Irom a wide
range 01 economic levels and age groups to live within its boundaries.
5. Businesses within the community should provide a range 01 job types lor the
community's residents.
6. The location and character 01 the community should be consistent with a larger transit
network.
7. The community should have a center locus that combines commercial, civic, cultural and
recreational uses.
8. The community should contain an ample supply 01 specialized open space in the lorm 01
squares, greens and parks whose Irequent use is encouraged through placement and
design.
g. Public spaces should be designed to encourage the attention and presence 01 people at
all hours 01 the day and night.
10. Each community or cluster 01 communities should have a well-defined edge, such as
agricultural greenbelts or wlidiile corridors, permanently protected Irom development.
11. Streets, pedestrian paths and bike paths should contribute to a system 01 lully-
connected and interesting routes to all destinations. Their design should encourage
pedestrian and bicycle use by being small and spatially defined by bulidings, trees and
lighting; and by dIscouraging hIgh speed traffic.
12. Wherever possible, the natural terrain, drainage and vegetation 01 the community should
be preserved with superior examples contained within parks or greenbelts.
13. The community design should help conserve resources and minimize waste.
14. Communities should provide lor the efficient use 01 water through the use 01 natural
drainage, drought tolerant landscaping and recycling.
15. The street orientation, the placement 01 buildings and the use 01 shading should
contribute to the energy efficiency 01 the community.
Regional Principles:
3.
The regional land-use planning structure should be integrated within a larger
transportation network built around transit rather than freeways.
Regions should be bounded by and provide a continuous system of greenbelUwildllfe
corridors to be determined by natural conditions.
Regional institutions and services (government, stadiums, museums, etc.) should be
located in the urban core.
Materials and methods of construction should be specific to the region, exhibiting a
continuity of history and culture and compatibility with the climate to encourage the
development of local character and community identity.
1.
2.
4.
Implementation Principles:
1. The general plan should be updated to incorporate the above principles.
2. Rather than allowing developer-initiated, piecemeal development, local governments
should take charge of the planning process. General plans should designate where new
growth, infill or redevelopment will be allowed to occur.
3. Prior to any development, a specific plan should be prepared based on these planning
principles.
4. Plans should be developed through an open process and participants In the process
should be provided visual models of all planning proposals.
If you would like more background information on the Ahwahnee Principles (including
where the name came from), please read the article reprinted from Western Cities
Magazine,
Intro I Ahwahnee Principles I Economic Development
[Community Design I Economic Oevelopment I Energy I Environment I
People and Community I Transportation I Waste Prevention]
[ Center for Livable Communities I Energy Information Clearinghouse ]
[ Ahwahnee Principles I Events I Bookstore I Programs/Services I
Free Publications/Resources]
[About LGC I Membership I Search I SlIe Map I Contact Us]
VOLUME 8' NUMBER S
JULY/AUGUST 2003
II\~¿
California calculating
Reexamining the accident statistics helps Palo Alto
qualify for a tree-lined boulevard.
Palo Alto, California, a 59,000-populationcity between San
Francisco and San Jose, illustrates the trend toward con-
text-sensitive design and the role that painstaking highway
safety studies play in attaining attractive roads. Bicyclists,
civic-minded residents, champions of tree planting, and par-
ents of schoolchildren lobbied for changes to El Camino Real,
a state road that carries 50,000 vehicles a day through the af-
fluent neighbor of Stanford University. In the 4.3 mile stretch
of EI Camino, the aim of local people was to plant the six-lane
road's median more consistently with trees, make it easier for
pedestrians to cross the 120-foot right-of-way, establish bike
lanes, widen the sidewalks, perhaps narrow some sections to
fOUI travel lanes, and generally make the corridor more ap-
pealing.
The state transportation agency Caltrans was willing to do
contextCsensitive design, says Reid Ewing, a subconsultant to
Oakland-based Community Design and Architecture, the
city's lead consultants on the project. But when the idea of I
planting large trees in a narrow median - less than 10 feet'
from traffic - was broached, transportation specialists for
the state said statistics showed that "medians with trees had
higher crash rates," Ewing says. "We took their report and
turned it around and reanalyzed it," Ewing says. "We found
that medians with trees were safer than untreed medians."
As a result, Caltrans has allowed the city to start its plant-
ing program. by installing about 250 trees, even in parts of the
median that are just eight feet wide. Along the entire stretch,
"we'd like to plant 1,000 trees," says VIrginia Warheit, Palo
Alto senior plarmer. For that to take place, thin sections of the
median, which now varies from three to 16 feet wide, would
I have to be broadened. That would be beneficial because it
, would create a refuge for pedestrians crossing the road,
Warheit says.
This fall the City Council is expected to vote on two alter-
native plans, one of which would reduce the number of travel
lanes on part ofEl Camino to fOUI. Oddly enough, fewer lanes I
could actually help traffic move more smoothly. Warheit says
that the lane reduction, which calls for construction of bulb-
outs at certain intersections, would reduce the expanse of
pavement and thus cut the time needed to cross the road by
28 percent. Motorists would spend less time stopped at traf-
fic lights waiting for pedestrians to cross. Sidewalks now 7.5
feet wide would be widened to 10 feet and the street would
be better marked for on-street parking and a 5-foot bike lane.
Caltrans readily agreed to reduce the travel lanes to 11 feet.
Other consultants on the project are Felu: & Peers for traffic
I analysis, Joe McBride for urban forestry, LCC Inc. for civil
engineering, and Urban Advantage for photo simulations. .
\ \
TE
A Governor's Pardon for the Housing Element
æ
NIN
Or, at least a temporary stay of execution. Or so it may
feel like for some jurisdictions and organizations. With
the wounds of battles and lawsuits still fresh, the last
item on a planner's wish list was another update of the
Housing Element. And yet that was just what was staring
them in the face, with some jurisdictions confronted WITh a
deadline of June 2004. The Governor's recent signing of
Senate Bill 491 (Ducheny) extends the planning period of
existing housing elements for one year and postpones the
due date for the next (4th) revision of local housing
elements, beginning with those due in 2005 (SANDAG). All
housing element due dates from the third revision cycle,
however, remain unchanged, as shown on the schedule
(see reverse).
Implications
Timing
For some jurisdictions, the extension is of little impact as
previous revision dates already loomed out three years or
more. For jurisdictions in the SANDAG or SCAG regions,
however, the additional year allows for better preparation
and improves Housing Elements' Sisyphean image. For
example, all SCAG jurisdictions now have until June 30th,
2006 to submIT a Housing Bement for certification. This
means that Housing Element update activities should begin
by late 2004 or early 2005. Additionally, jurisdictions
undertaking comprehensive General Plan updates between
now and late 2004 should also include their Housing
Element as part of the comprehensive update.
Updating without RHNA Figures
You may ask, "How can we update the Housing Element
without any RHNA figures?" In fact, nearly 80% of a Housing
Element can be updated without RHNA figures. For example,
socia-economic profiles - particularly those that relied upon
1990 Census figures - can be updated with new 2000
Census data or recent technical studies. Additionally, if not
already done as part of an annual monitoring program,
jurisdictions can track and record the number of affordable
units created during and since the previous planning period.
Housing programs and goals can also be updated, if
necessary. All of this and more can be updated regardless of
the RHNA figures.
T
p
N
L
A
H
E
Your next question may be, "But how can we update and
adopt the Housing Element while maintaining both
consistency and State certification?" The State specifically
calls out the need for periodic review of the housing element
to determine whether a revision is required prior to the next
update cycle. Reasons a housing element must be updated
prior to the next update cycle include:
t. New policies, regulations, or requirements have been
adopted that inhibit the ability to meet housing goals;
2. Current goals, policies, and programs that are not
proving to be effective; or
3. A comprehensive general plan update is undelWay or
other portions of the general pian have been amended,
making it necessary to revise the housing eiement to
achieve internal consistency.
Jurisdictions can amend and adopt a Housing Element prior
to the next planning cycle without resubmitting for
certification so long as the Element does not undergo
significant changes. An example of a significant change
would be an overhaul of the land use inventory or a
revocation of an inclusionary housing ordinance. In cases of
significant changes, the jurisdiction would need to resubmit
the Housing Element for certification. The issue of
significance can best be resolved through communication
with the State Department of Housing & Community
Development.
Insight into land Use and Regional Growth
On a larger scale, revisiting the Housing Element now can
provide valuable insight into how expected growth' needs
compare with a jurisdiction's capacity and desire. This
insight can enable jurisdictions to be more effective
participants in the deveiopment of the regional growth
forecasts. Moreover, a concurrent review of the Housing and
Land Use Elements will enable jurisdictions to generate an
accurate and precise land use inventory in preparation for
new RHNA figures.
Summary
Jurisdictions can take advantage of the State's deadline
extension by becoming more informed through data
collection and better prepared through policy and
G
c
E
E
R
N
T
.,
CENTER <11~~
programmatic reviews. Aithough it may seem too eariy to
begin reviewing the Housing Element, tha work you do now
will be repaid tenfold in terms of time, money, and sanity
down the road.
Update on AB 2292
In a March 2003 Issue of CenteNiews, we reported on some
of the potential implications of AB 2292, the "No Net Loss"
Housing bill that precludes downzoning of properties if it
would result in a net loss of residential capacity needed to
meet the jurisdiction's fair share housing obligation.
The provisions of this law are especially important to
consider when updating the land use inventory as part of the
Land Use and Housing Elements. The jurisdiction must
ensure that sufficient residential capacity is maintained to
meet the jurisdiction's fair share housing obligation for all
four income categories as stated in the certified Housing
Element In cases where the jurisdiction wishes to rezone or
downzone land for different uses, alternative sifes must be
identified, For example, plans to revitalize an area of the city
or county by rezoning residential land for lower density
residential or commercial uses would require the jurisdiction
to identify altemative sites that could accommodate the
allocated fair share housing obligation.
This law has caused great confusion and controversy since
its enactment in late 2002, with numerous organizations
seeking amendments. One of the proposed amendments is
AB 1192 (Dutra). This new bill would amend the provisions
of AB 2292 and require that the jurisdiction serve as the
responsible party for identifying additional sites to
compensate tor the lost residentiai capacity.
AB 1192 includes an exception for cases when a project
applicant requests in his or her initial application a density
that would resuit in the remaining sites in the housing
element not being adequate to accommodate the
jurisdiction's share of the regional housing need. In that
case, the jurisdiction may require the project applicant to
identify alternative sites with a potential for increased
density. Cases where the jurisdiction couid not require
applicants to identify alternative sites include changes
pertormed through a jurisdiction's General Plan Update or
Instances where the jurisdiction requests the applicant to
develop at lower densities.
Other amendments are also proposed by the League of
California Cities and the California Building Industry
Association. The State Department of Housing & Community
Development will publish guidelines on the law following
amendments passed in the current legislative session.
Housing Element Planning Periods
Pursuant to S6 491. (Chapter 58, Statutes of 2003)
Effective July 14, 2003
Regional Jurisdictions 3,d Rev. 4th Rev.
Date' Date
San Diego Assoc, of Govts. San Diego County and all cities within the County 12131199 061030105
(SANDAG):
So. California Assoc. of Counties of Imperial. Los Angeles, Orange. Riverside. San Bernardino. Ventura, and all cities within 12131/00 06130106
Govts. (SCAG): each County.
Association of Bay Area Counties of Aiameda, Contra Costa. Marin. Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo. Santa Clara, Solano, 12/31101 06130107
Govts. (ABAG): Sonoma, and all cities within the County.
Council of Fresno County Fresno County and all cities within the County.
Govts. (Fresno COG):
Kern County Council of Kem County and all cities within the County. 06130102 06130108
Govts. (Kern COG):
Sacramento Area Council of Counties of EI Dorado', Placer', Sacramento. Sutter, Yolo, Yuba. and all cities within each County.
Govts. (SACOG):
Association of Monterey Bay Counties of Monterey. Santa Cruz, and all cities within each County. 12131102 06130/08
Area Govts. (AMBAG):
Counties of (all cities within each county): Santa Barbara, Stanislaus, San Joaquin, Nevada, Sierra,
All Other Local Merced. Kings. Tulare, Butte, Alpine. Amador. Calaveras, Tuolumne, Humboldt. Inyo. Mono, Lake, 12/31/03 0613O1O9
Governments: Mendocino, San Luis Obispo, Siskiyou, Colusa, Glenn, Tehama, San Benito, Del Norte, Lassen,
Madera, Mariposa, Madoc. Plumas, Shasta, and Trinity
¡ The due dates for/hiscycle were not changed bySB 491.
, EI Doredo and Placer Counties have a 2009 oplion for the 4th revision.
æ
CenteMews is published by The Planning Genter as a service to our clients and fnends. This material Is provided for generai infonnation purposes only and does not
constitute legal advice. The Planning Genter is a private consuiting linn providing planning and environmental consulting services for both governmental agencies and
the pnvate sector. We have completed Housing Elements and General Plans for more than 100 cities and counties and are available to assist ¡unsdictions
with reviewing, scoping, and updating all elements 01 the General Plan. Our newsletters and other inlonnation are available on our website.
15BO Metro Drive I Gosta Mesa. CA 92626
Phone: 714,966.9220 I Website: www.planningcenter.com
Any questions or comments reiated to this CenterViews issue may be directed to Golln Orukker at cdrukker@pianningcenter.com.
Copy<ighl@S,pl,mb"2003byTh,Plaoo'mgCeot",AII<ighffir",",d,
Ed itorials ~~:i~~;~~~utgNews
THU"'AY, DECEMBER la, 2DD3
~'
\
~'
r
I'
GE property
Walkable
retail is
the ticket
I
i
BUT SAN JOSE SHOULD KEEP
SOME LAND FOR INDUSTRIAL USES
A new shopping area close to the new Communica-
tions Hill neighborhood got a unanhnous thumbs-up
froin the San Jose City Council Tuesday night, and
the discussion of the proposal raised two interesting
points. One was encouraging; the other a caution.
First, the good one. Councihnan Tmy Gregory,
who repre_ts the Monterey Road industriai area,
supported commercial development on General Elec-
tric's 55 acres with one condition: that it not he retail
as usual. That is, not another strip shopping center
with higuglybuildings and a vast seaofhlacktop.
Gregory invoked the "town center" model - the
heck-to-the-futui'e concept of designing shopping ar-
eaS'where people can actually walk from store to
store without dodging cars in parking lots, and which
might even he pleasant
to look at. Suburhan
developers often dis-
miss the idea, hut i~s
working in other parts
ofthe country.
The local example is
Santana Row. I~s an
unusual case hecause
of costly whimsies Iilœ
importing a chapel
from Itely to use as a
flower shop. Forget all
that. The fundamentai
design idea - a street
. where people can walk
without dodging cars
- need not hreak the
hank. And it includes
some hig box stores - even a Best Buý, which looks
perfectly comfortable in its pedestrIan-oriented set-
ting.
A higher standard for retail areas will ensure that
they hold up better over tbne. Gregory made a good
point. '
The council's enthusiasm for this plan raises a note
of caution, however While retail is appropriste for
the GE site because of its location and other econom-
ic factors, approvals of other requests to change in-
dustrialland to retail should be far from automatic.
San Jose'needs to retain plenty of industrial land
for a halanced economy. Wholesale conversions to re-
tail will bring in some quick-fix sales tax dollars, but
in the long run they could cripple the city's ability to
support cutting edge industry. New developments
ili~;~d~eg~~~~K~::~~ r::~~~d~Chine shops. Once
The GE decision should he an example of thought-
fuI change, not a signal that anything goes.
" --",' ,
<",,}f;' \rI"
;r' ,\ %..
I <\:/,"'0.." \~
,/',%( ~'~~. 'San'J",e \
"'J,\,~,.",>,,~'TU;""':-
è'i'/,<""'(", .
(Jf~".'",',',< \á'",;",/",O,",;tv,'
0 \\ './-1-' "'"rn"mf,
1 ~¡ifM":~~/i:I' '
,"'j'!, P..k
. @
'\
0 111,\
""';;;;-' "
Foreword
In his 1999 bestseller, A Man in' Full, Tom Wolfe wrore of the placeless-
ness of so many of our suburban landscapes, including the easternmost
reaches of the San Francisco Bayarea.
He had driven through that whole area, from Vme Hill, where he lived, on
east to Pittsburg [California} and beyond, and it was now one vast goulash of
condominiums and other new, cheap housing. The only way you could tell you
were leaving one community and entering another was when the franchises
started repeating and you spotted another 7-Eleven, another Wendy}, another
Costco, another Home Depot. The new landmarks were not office towers or
monuments or city haltJ or libraries or museums but 7-Eleven stores.
Generations of suburbanites have now come to realize that a 7-Eleven, as
useful as it is, does not a place make.
This book talks abour the creation of suburban places, which many would
consider an oxymoron. But that wasn't always the case. Contrary to popular
belief, suburbs are not a modern phenomenon. Prior to the 19th century,
wherever you had a major city like London or Paris, Cairo, or Beijing, you
had outlying development-a few homes, a shop or two--that evenrually
grew into a recognizable and separate village: a suburb.
Sub",b..-.. '" und=tand ili"" in ili, Unitod
Stato>-,oally ..w ilici< gro"" in ili, =ly 1800,.
Th", w= pl."" ili,t wm ddib,tatcly d"ignw to
b, ph,..iadly =d '}'ffiboliadly "p=to lrom tho
in=ingly lug<. immigrant-/ill,d. p'oliutod, rod
no;"y U.S. cia". Tho "",aon olili", fmt'ub",b,
wu wo tlti"", by """'pomaon; it /wi to b, "'Y
ROt a bwin",man. lot """"pI,. to ",vclFrom 1m
mb",b=ho= to ili,city.
By tho =Iy 20ili ""'"'Y. whro taiiroad. rod
noli", ~, witbp=d and tcliabl,. virnWly <V<ty
=jOt U.S. city /wi io ,uburn.. It "" during thi.,
!",iod that..vetal """'" now tOmmunia" ~d,
mch " Ch"tnut Hill rod tho Main Lin~ ouoide
Philadclphia; S"",,""~ ou"ide Now ¥otk; Ch"'J'
C/w" ouaide W..bington, D.G.; ili, g=t North
Sho",ubu'¡", IilœLaltoPo"",, ouoide Chitago; and
mn B"",'¡y Hilli, a nwt"-plannod romm<tnity
whon; fim loa ~t on ili, tna<"" in 1906. Th",
cuJy ptototypiad ,ub",!" - not ",tUcly bodmom
rommuni"". Thoy, - mo" Iilœ vill""" o1"'t=l
around ttain ,taa"", rod boatting link mm ,--
willi n<ighbo,hood-.uving ,hop" a Ièw apanmroo,
,chmch, 'po" Dill", rod a libwy. tad pl=.
Wiili tho "" of tho au'omobil, in tho 1920. rod
1930" ili", =Iy ,ub",b..--.nd do"", 01 n<'NO'
on~tadly <=hod ilici< hqday.1n mo" in¡"""',
they oonan",d to 01""" around ttain Ot nolity ",-
aomand villag<",,=. But ility"'-<t<d to got big"
g<t, "","" p,opl, ,ould now tit"" ilici< "'" to tho
ttain",aon.
Th, po,,-Wo,ld Wu II mb",bro boom ~
wo """,pomaon-tltivro, but now it "" mictly
automobil" andJ"ow"... not tail, iliot p"'¡',d ,ub-
",ban dovdopmrot. Th", now ,ommunia", Iilœ
Long ¡.t,nd', ¡"'vittown Ot Lo, Angd,,', Sro
P,,"rodo V,lk~ "'to dilf=nt from ili, ,ubUt.. 01
ili, 1920, =d 1930, in on, oili" koy 1"'0" thty
didn't hOY< a main "to", 0' , villag< ""'" ani",
ility happenod '0 ",gulf an old" oommunity. Th,y
w=n'tp/""'. Thty~"i,"plY""'taft",,""'ol
'ingldomily hom", willi an o""ion,] ,01,,01
thrown in. But ilion; - no ""' publi"".Jm." no
civit ""to", no m,," """,.
Som' p,opl, cloim that ili, n;giond mopp""
mal , that ß"W up on tho outiliro 01 ili", ,ubUt..
"'to ,implyili, now "",ion 01 a public tadm.1 dl.-
og=. A publi, tadm" wout ,ommunity. not ""'ply
,bout oomum,,""'. A publi, ".1m " ro outdoot
'p'" in ili, h= ola oommunitywiilia vati'tyol
=. It" infu.ed willi civit p,ideand ili,loftydttam,
olili, oommunity. An;gional mall, by ioclf", nOt.
Mo" p"'t-Wo,1d Wu II ,ub",b, won; bod.
tOom oommuniti". Thty w= ß'"t pl= to "",
famiIkt, oIfuing good bowing at , "..ouwl, "".
But ility w",n't nu, p1a=. Thi.., 0100=,. ¡, tho
tOW 01 OUt ,,~bUtban dilroun' today. How do you
dofin,", pIa,,"?
vlK&fu-Í L,.PxNb Ir-lSHlAíE.-
fL.kl~mP<\(\ Nq
1)e;aoç'll\.l~\CUò:j ceNÎi%
~I'\\~ <) í((e4~iI\N1)
u Rf-J1\1-\ VI L.M\~6:> I'
r MV'-.v~ c. p# /-cÃ.û..,(,
I
A combin,rion of m",y thing>-&om =hi"c-.
. lu", 10 ,"Itun! io,ritudom, ro topognph~ ru..rol)',
'couom~ ",d phY'iO] 'pp,u",c<-cr~" pia".
Bul th", ;, 00< roo" k<)' "",oe you mwl h"",
,oci,] in""",,,on '° hoy" tru, pI",. M",ymbwb;
'!J'mi,d ,oci,] in"""rion by phY'iolly frngm,ming
ow liv",. Ow horn"" job" ,hnpping, ="min-
m,nt, hnu"" of wo~hip, ",d civic imriturion' w=
,]I"p=I,dfmm"cl,oth",lndrect,mo"mbwb,
bwun' th, ",rith",;, oftru, pI"".
Th,N~T~M==tofth, 196o,"", up
in di"ct ""pom, 1o th", pl"d"" mbwb,.
Foll~ing EUtOpew =mpl"" th", now '~m w=
conœi""d " b,]",œd ",d vittuilly tdf-ronuino!
rommuniri<t-with bowing of ,]I kind. ",d pd"
t2n"",; olli" ",d indumi,] join; ",d "tail, =",-
Wnm<n" ",book, ho"", of wonhip, ",d pula, ,]I
within elm, &1"'" by foOl, bkycl" °' ,ulomobil,.
Th"" n~town>_",]1 ,",ou, "",tingpl"".
Unfnrtun"dy, th, n~ lowm th" w= buill
,],0 ,doPl,d m",y d,m<nB from mo&,tilit Ulb",
d",igo th" wo,k,d 'gaiml pI", m;Ùcing, ineluding
/atg< ,on", of "p=" w'" ",d high-,';"d =d~Y'
d"igoo! aelwivdy fo, ,ulomobil",. Th<)' did,
ho~" «P""'"' , g,nuin" ro~unil)'-'o]'
pl",uing dfot! '0 ""'« tllitincti"", coh"""" pI"".
Mo" of th, odgin,] o<w town, fd! imo fin",ciaI
"oubl<. Dfth, two do"n °''° tru'n~towm th"
~'pl,=,din th, 1960" only,h",dfulw,"'inlo
full-,O], d"dopm,"', ineluding ""'on, Vagi""';
Col=bi" Mo.tyI",d; !tvin" Califomi~ =d ou,
comp=i' V,],nci" Califomi~
Th, "",, m,jodl)' of mbUlb", d"dopm,nl in
th, 1960" 1970" ",d 1980, continnoi '° taIœ thi
fo.. of pi"""", co~unid",. Th, I", f~ g<n'~-
dom of Am«i"", hOY< cudy had th, ap«i""" of
lOOming rog<th« on , ",,-lin,d m"" to .hnp, 1O
w,]k,[re,dinn«,O"O talkwithfrl<nd., b,atw,typ-
io] mbUlb.. «duœd th, ""<t to , ,ingl,-pwpo'~
p<d""'i=-intimidating trnJIic ",ctiaI.
Fot!=Id~ in ""n! y<=, th, p<ndulUtO Iw
b<gnn 10 owing '~y from tIm d"dopm=t p"'«n.
Mo" =dmo" p,opl'=I 1o ,,'wn 1O th, I"¿¡-
don,] mm ""« °' '~n ""'«, p"'"u/atly" ow
li"", b<eom' ron« mobil" mo" glob,], mo« com-
pu,«i=!, =d mo« h,cti~ D"'pi« ,]I the t>Ik
,bOUl "going vhnW," p,opl, run =, , ,,'me of
b<longing, , "rn, of co~uni'Y' ,pl"e.
A n~ dmlopm=t !tend ;, hdping '° PUl th,
pI", b,d< into ow ronununili",. In , d<lib",«
,",mp' ro .""'« , "m, of pb"",d idenril)', ",d
1O gain '" oig' wh<n comp,ting with oth« "'" fa,
funue d"dopm<n' =d in""""d "" <mnu"',
po,,-Wodd W" II mbUlb, "'"" th, roun")' '"
building mm """" fmm "~Irn °' "invigo",ing
old'~"n"".
A, N~halll=d, - b<li"e thaI t!t<te mulùdi-
mention.! main """" '"' , Iœy ro rnbwb= pI",
m;Ùcing. Th,'" why - '"' building one, ~,d
T~n een", Dd"". And th"., why hundttd. of
oth« now mbwb= toWn "",et!, wain """", =d
wb", vill""" "e piannoi. un<let comtruction, °'
ilie>dy <nmpleted "'"" th, United S"",. Th=
n~ main "n,," '"' 'FlOuting up. in vinu,]ly =1)'
kind of po,,-Wodd w" II ronununity-from ,
'p~ling rnbwb like S<ha=btttg, n= Chl"'8o, to
D;,nq', new rovm of C</eb"rion, F~ri&. 10<)',],0
coke many fonns-ITom "=,, thaI "" """,, blocla
long m aee-.hado! rown 'q= ",d vill>ge gmm.
10= n~ mburn= main ocr,," '" not out-
d~, .hopping m,]], """Iu,nuling " mm """'.
Like the 'm,]l-,~ mm roe'" of the p..-Wodd
W" II 1=', th<)' ha"" ,full tange of=ty<1ayu=
",d ,ctiviri<t-ineluding of/Ice, ",tail, =«min-
m,"" ho,d" hawing, ",d civic imtituriom like
public lib""i<>-<ill integnted within. peJemion-
&i=dJy =vitOnm=I. 10<)' ~e pbc", in ml)' "me
oftheworo.=d th<)'~e "",ting"en~ of pI"" fn,
thili mbwbm <nmmuniù".
Mo" impo't2nl, rown <en"" '" ",joyed by
people. A. F"d K=" p"';deot ofProjoct fn, P~blic
Sp,,~, 00" comm<u«d, "People liIœ 1O ..th« io
""""" th" """" oth« p"'ple. 10<)' like "","
. with "°"'. Th,y lilt< 1O moY< chM hefo" ,i"ing
in them, ~ if they mm th,m tighl b,d< to th,
po,iùon tbq found them in. And thm '" fow
thin", th"p,ople ,ujoyw"clUng roo" th", 'p"'-
ingp=de."
Mm meeB =d tOwn "'U«". ~e p",ing
p=d", moth«hood ",d 'ppl, pi~ Tb<)' '" old-
["hiono! =i vet)' rou"mpo"')'. 10<)' '" quainl
=d u,b=. Mo" impo","I, th<)' ""'" , ~m' of
pl"e. . . withoul' 7-El=n.
In the nOt! funue, - m,y look h,d< on th,
po....Wudd W" II d,ad", " = ",om,]y...... the
only rim, wh,n ",~uniri~ lailid , true main
",eelo'"pl""."
Gary Cusumano
ChiefEx<euù"" Olli,« =d P",idenl
N~b,]l¡""d
V']=ci~c.Iifo,ni,
I'
'4
Smart Growth in the San Francisco Bay Area:
Effective Local Approaches
A study commissioned by the
San Francisco District Council
of the Urban land Institute
June 2003
CONTENTS
Guidelines for Land Monitoring. . . . . . . . . . . . . .46
Transit-Oriented Development Planning Guide. .50
Preservation and Rehabilitation Tax Incentives. .53
Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance. . . . .57
A Community Walkability Code. . . . . . . . . . . . . .65
Implementation Funding Sources. . . . . . . . . . . .69
Local Smart Growth Tools ..................83
BibliographybyStrategy...................85
Generalized Bibliography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .90
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
Ii
.1
INTRODUCTION .......................................1
WHAT IS SMART GROWTH? .............................2
LOCAL BAY AREA SMART GROWTH PLANNING PRIORITIES. . .3
SMART GROWTH STRATEGIES
. INFILLDEVELOPMENT ...........................5
. TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT. . . . . . . . . .. . . . .11
. INCLUSIONARYHOUSING ........................16
. MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT ......................20
. ADAPTIVE REUSE ..............................23
. JOBS-HOUSING BALANCE .......................27
. COMPACT DEVELOPMENT .......................31
ESSENTIAL IMPLEMENTATION METHODS
. COMMUNITY ACCEPTANCE TECHNIQUES. . . . . . . . . . .35
. INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40
APPENDIX A.
APPENDIX B.
APPENDIX C.
APPENDIX D.
APPENDIX E.
APPENDIX F.
APPENDIX G.
APPENDIX H.
APPENDIX I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTRODUCTION
Cities and regions rhroughout California, and rhe state itself, are struggling ro meet
rhe dual challenge of promoting economic prosperity while developing equitable and
sustainable parrerns of growth. Many in the planning and development communities
have looked for answers in a set of principles garhered under rhe rubric of "smarr
growth." Simply put, smart growth means planning and providing for growth rhat
creates livable communities and rhat is economically sound and environmentally and
socially responsible. The smart growth equation includes affordable housing, man-
ageable traffic patterns, sensible use of resources, and access ro open space. There are
a growing number of examples from around rhe Bay Area and across the nation
where communities have used smart growth strategies ro guide development in ways
that make rhe most of current resources while also preserving and promoting an
enhanced vision for rhe future.
This report reviews recent smart growth practices rhat could have rhe greatest impact
and potential for success in rhe Bay Area. It identifies common characteristics of key
local techniques, and describes how they have already been used to promote more
sustainable and livable communities in the Bay Area. Included are techniques that
have a specific area focus, as well as rhose applicable at a community-wide and
region-wide scale.
The report is intended as a tool for local communities struggling wirh rhe challenges
of housing provision and affordability, traffic congestion, community opposition ro
more sustainable growth parrerns, preservation of critical open space, redevelopment
of underused sites, infrastructure financing, and maintaining strong economies. It is
not meant to address all smart growth fOols, nor is it an argument againsr alternative
visions of growth. It is simply an arrempt ro catalogue and explain rhe keys ro imple-
menting a particular set of policy responses rhat, evidence suggests, will promote
healthier and more sustainable growth parrerns than past and current approaches
have rhus far produced. It is hoped rhat rhis information will lead ro greater under-
standing and acceptance of smart growth principles and practices rhroughout rhe Bay
Area, and be a valuable resource for community leaders.
SMART GROWTH IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA: EFFECTIVE LOCAL ApPROACHES
. enhance mobility for all residentS, not just those with automobiles, as they carry
out daily tasks, such as traveling to work or school, shopping, and maintaining
community ties;
.
I
II
Ii
iii
I!
.
I
.
.
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
.
.
.
.
.
I
.
.
WHAT IS SMART GROWTH?
All smart growth principles involve the concept of promoting more livable and func-
tional communities. Advocates define sman growth communities as environmentS
that:
. accommodate the need for new housing, employment growth, and population
increase by making the most efficient use of urban land;
. preserve and protect important open space and species habitat;
. are respectful of the needs of neighboring jurisdictions and the region as a whole;
and
. make the cartying our of smart growth practices by developers, lenders, builders,
and other interested panies as simple and streamlined as possible.
Sman growth is not a predetermined utopian vision of the future. It is rather an
attempt to correct the ills of our current development pattern in principled and time-
tested ways. Many of the principles of smart growth are not new. They are based on
practices that have produced some of our most desirable living environmentS, be they
small towns, suburban communities, or large cities. Smart growth does not seek to
overturn the wishes of residentS or communities desiring a more dispersed lifestyle,
nor does it attempt to prescribe a one-size-fits-all pattern for living. It is primarily a
series of alternatives to current development patterns that seeks to alleviate some of our
current urban woes.
2
SMART GROWTH IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA: EFFECTIVE LOCAL ApPROACHES
LOCAL SMART GROWTH PLANNING
PRIORITIES
In late 2002, interviews were held with 20 local public sector planning and commu-
nity development professionals representing 14 different localities in the Bay Area,
including counties, large cities, towns, and suburban communities. This investiga-
tion primarily focused on two issues: (I) the implementation status of local smart
growth activities, and (2) smart growth strategies thought to have the greatest posi-
tive impact on the future of the Bay Area. The purpose of the survey was to identifY
those strategies that are clearly understood, of interest, or currendy being integrated
into local planning and development review processes.
Respondents were largely familiar with the list of smart growth strategies presented
in the survey, and many had already made use of them in some capacity. However,
several respondents indicated that while they were willing to consider various smart
growth strategies, they were hindered by a lack of good information on implementa-
tion techniques and past results. Respondents were most willing to consider these
strategies: transfer of development rights (45 percent), coordination and collabora-
tion with neighboring communities (36 percent), adaptive reuse (27 percent), densi-
ty bonuses and other incentives (27 percent), transportation demand management
(27 percent), inclusionary housing (18 percent), jobs/housing balance (18 percent),
and creative funding fot inftastructure (18 petcent).
The survey also asked respondents to indicate which strategies they thought would
have the greatest positive impact ifimplemented throughout the Bay Area. The most
ftequendy mentioned were infill, transit-oriented development, compact develop-
ment, jobs/housing linkage, and community acceptance techniques.
Based on these findings, this report focuses on smart growth strategies that have
potential for implementation and, if enacted, would have a significant impact
on future growth patterns in the Bay Area. The strategies detailed are:
. Infill development
. Transit-oriented development
. Inclusionary housing
. Mixed-use development
. Adaptive reuse
. Jobs-housing balance
. Compact development
SMART GROWTH IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA: EFFECTIVE LOCAL ApPROACHES
3
. Community acceptance techniques
. Creative infrastructure financing
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
II
II
II
iii
.
.
II
.
II
II
II
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
&I
The repon also provides information on the following issues, which have been iden-
tified as often critical in implementing smart growth stretegies:
Where appropriate, the discussion of these strategies incorporates related approaches
identified by the survey respondems, such as density bonuses, transfet of development
rights, and coordination with neighboring communities.
For each strategy, the repon provides a definition, describes how and where it might
apply, and outlines implementation techniques. Illustrations of local best practices
are also included.
4
SMART GROWTH IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA EFFECTIVE LOCAL APPROACHES
C M UNITY DESIGN &
TRANSPORTATION
BEST PRACTICES FOR INTEGRATING TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE
ROGR/.\
¡: Vv'
&, . . T' (l."
~m., Valley Transportation Authority
Part of every trip you taJœ.
IN THIS DOCUMENT
1 INTRODUCTION
2 INTEGRATING TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE
3 THE COSTS OF GROWTH
4 REALIZING THE VISION
5 PRINCIPLES FOR BEST PRACTICES
6 OVERCOMING BARRIERS
2
4
6
10
15
19
COMMUNITY
DESIGN &
TRANSPORTATION
Ie
Ie city
corM' :
inlerpley of lend use and Imn:part,,;ion
deep!' ,-,fl"e"ces our remmunities and our qualily of lile.
So ho,'
Ne design ocr Ironspoltalion systems and
to optimize bolh livability and mobility?
fh"
to this i""domente! questioll ore the focus of
The
Design ¿, Transportation Progrom.
"THE BEST WAY TO PREDICT THE FUTURE IS TO INVENT IT"
-Alan Kay
The Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) plays an important role in land development, and is dedicated to
effecting positive changes in land use through its development and operation of a comprehensive multimodal
transportation system. As caretaker of the existing transportation network and administrator of future investment,
VTA supports growth with coorilinated increases in transportation infrastructure and services. It can also use its
transportation investments to channel growth and guide the design of new development.
In an effort to guide new growth more actively, VTA is now strengthening the multimodal aspects of the county's
transportation system. Many elements of the system are already in place or under development. For instance, since
1985 VTAhas been developing an extensive light rail transit system. 'Ibday, the 29-mile system spans from
Mountain View to southern San Jose, connecting residential areas to high. tech employment sites; another 21 miles
are planned to be in place by 2010. In addition, the planned BART extension to San Jose will provide an important
regional rapid transit link to other Bay Area centers. These projects, along with commuter rail and bus service
networks, represent some of the best opportunities for initiating change in the use and form of adjacent land.
VTA's Community Design & 7J-ansportation (CDT) Program proposes new models for land use and transportation
planning that are responsive to the diverse lifestyles and travel needs of residents and workers in Santa Clara
County. These models are intended to provide mobility and livability options based on proven traditions of urban
design and development, and also to respond to the dynamics of a changing society and new technologies present in
the new millennium.
The quest for homeownership and predominance of the
automobile have defined the shope of postwar communities
I; /?
In Conlrosl, Santo Claro Counly's pre World War II communities
were designed far walking.
Much of the post World War !Ilandscape consis/s of inward.laoking and poorly<:onnecled subdivisions.
HOW WE GOT HERE
Santa Clara County has passed through several periods of growth and development, each with a distinct land use
and transportation pattern. Historically an agricultural region, the county began the process of urbanization in the
first half of the 20th century. At that time, mass transit provided the primary means of mobility for most people.
Public transportation was integrated into the very fabric of our communities, since destinations had to be within
walking distance of transit stations to be easily accessible. Transit lines evolved in concert with the city, often
guiding urban growth. Cities were built for walking and structured around public transportation hubs.
After World War II, tremendous changes in society and industry altered how our cities grew and how we lived our
lives. One of these changes was the emergence of the private automobile as the primary role of travel. The car,
coupled with home ownership, came to symbolize freedom and prosperity. With the constraints of fixed.rail
removed, people could now travel anywhere for work and play. As more people moved to Santa Clara County, more
houses, offices, and shops were needed. The mobility offered by the automobile allowed this development to occur in
the countryside, further and further from traditional cores.
Out in the suburbs there was primarily one way to get around-by car. Two changes resulted. First, we began to
design new development solely for ease of automobile movement, at the expense of travel by foot, bike, and transit.
Second, we moved from mixing activities, like working and shopping in one place, to separating them out over
distances traversable only by car. This model worked fine. so long as government.subsidized road building programs
and seemingly endless supplies ofland were available. It was under this model that the rapid growth over the last
several decades has taken place. In the absence of regional consensus on how to grow, jurisdictions have competed
for new development without regard to regional impacts.
New approaches to dealing with growth are now taking shape, ones that recognize and foster the link between land
use and transportation. The CDT Program presents a new paradigm for growth and development in the county by
promoting approaches that maximize our existing investments in transportation infrastructure and energize our
urban environments.
....~ DfSlGN '. TRAN5PORTIlliQl'L.__.c21
THE BEST PRACTICES PROGRAM
The Community Design & Transportation (CDT) Program is VTA:s primary tool to promote projects and policies that
integrate transportation and land use. Adopted as part of the VTA:s countywide transportation plan, the Valley
Transportation Plan 2020 (VTP 2020), the program is a collaboration between VTA and its member agencies, the
cities, town and county of Santa Clara.
The first work product of this program is a comprehensive "how-to" manual that provides design guidelines,
planning tools, and policy guidance for coordinating transportation and land use in projects across the county. It
addresses the location and type of development and its integration with existing and planned transportation
systems, multimodal streets, and the "3 Ds" of transit-and pedestrian-supportive development-design, denaity, and
diversity.
The CDT is also about creating partnershipa for success between VTA and its member business and the county
agencies. Applications for development approvals, plans for construction and infraatructure projects, and designs
for a range of private and public improvements stream across counters in 16 planning departments in Santa Clara
County. Sixteen planning commissions, 15 city town councils, and the County Board of Supervisors are called upon
to make decisions regarding proposals in their respective jurisdictiona. Unfortunately, there is little recognition of
the cumulative impacts of development and tranaportation projects across jurisdictional boundaries, and there is
only limited coordination between VTA:s provision of transportation services and land use decisions made by
member agencies.
The CDT Pragom is designed to help coordinate new development with VTA's multi modal transil system.
VTA's light rail system, connecting employment centers and
residential areas: 29 miles and expanding quickly.
USE OF THE BEST PRACTICES MANUAL
Best Prat~ces Manual
. Decision Makers
. Community Visioning and Planning
. Inter-Agency Cooperation
. Design and Development Community
Community & Agency Support
. Planning Regulations
. Design Prindples and Standards
. Marketing Materials
. Project Proposals
Oukome
. Well-Designed and Sustainable Communities
The CDT Program looks beyond these boundaries of jurisdiction and discipline. It identifies the elements of goad
development and multimadal transportation systems, and builds support for cammon and consistent application.
A successful outcome requires that elements of good development and multimodal transportation systems be
clearly identified, well understood, and embraced by agency staffs, decision-makers, and community members, as
well as the development and business communities. These basic concepts and principles should be integrated into
every aspect of the planning processes, implementation efforts, and management values of our cities.
CDT creates an active partnership between VTA and Member Agencies with ongoing participation by local
government staff and decision-makers. The program involves:
. Defining best practices in planning, design and development, with the understanding that they may vary from
jurisdiction to jurisdiction. This collection of Best Practices has been compiled into manual of a Best Practices for
Integrating Transportation and Land Use.
. Providing CDT Planning grants to member agencies for special planning projects that implement the CDT
Program principles and Best Practices through local plans and chenges in regulations.
. Identifying steps toward implementation of best practices that VTAand Member Agencies can take. These
steps include changes to technical standards and procedures like traffic level.of.service (LOS) policies and
planning efforts.
. Involving all stakeholders in a process of education, outreach, and implementation.
. Coordinating ongoing VTA activities such as the Proactive Congestion Management Program (CMP),
Development Review, and Transit-Oriented Development (TOD), and station area planning and design with
modifications needed to respond to the development ofthe CDT Program.
. Creating a long-range vision for growth in the county that enhances the quality of life for residents and
workers, coupled with an incremental, creative and realistic approach to implementation.
~
~- COMMUNITY DESIGN \ TRANSPORTl.\IlQðL_J.-
(JUR NfW TO 01!'SGf
In many ways, the rapid growth of the last few decades has been a blessing for the region. The formation and
expansion of high-tech companies, which began in the 1960s and gained momentum in the late 1990s, has
reinforced Silicon Valley's role as a center of technological innovation. Santa Clara County's success is seen in
dramatic upsurges in its population, employment, income levels, and political influence on a national level.
This growth came at a magnitude beyond prediction and at a pace difficult to match. Without the frame work for a
regional response to growth, jurisdictions within the county could not mobilize toward a common vision, and new
development often occurred in piecemeal fashion.
As a result, much of to day's urban form in Santa Clara County, like that of many other places in the western United
States, is low-density, auto-oriented, and single-use, a landscape of disconnected groups of houses, strip malls along
wide arterial roadways, and isolated office parks surrounded by parking lots. Long distances between destinations
and low concentrations of jobs and housing have transformed the automobile from a convenience to a necessity.
These places are inefficient to serve with transit service and make walking and bicycling difficult, dispiriting and
after dangerous. This is borne out in today's travel patterns where most trips are made by car and relatively few
trips are made by transit, walking and bicycle. By and large, this is a place for the automobile, rather than for
people.
" '.,.,..~<"'J~""""'"
..""",.."..",;:,.".,i(~.' "'.'."."1Ii'-:¡:,./. .
":,I;>""'~'~~'!:-. -~,~,.:~,'
Much of Sonto Cloro County was buill for cors, nol people. The COT Progrom aims 10 moke ploces thol are wolkable.
SANTA ClARA COUNTY COMMUTE PROFILI 2000
Tm",it
4%
SO""" "DES I" 'oy ,," Comm"'m
land use pa"erns and transportation options ore strang
determinants of made choice. Mast people in the Bay Area
drive alone to work.
The true cast of this urban farm and its impacts on
our quality of life are OIùy now beginning to reveal
themselves. They affect our lives in subtle and not-so-
subtle ways, but all are related to how we have built
our cities. Here are same of them:
. Traffic Congestion. Current projections put the
number of desired morning peak trips in 2020 at
419,000, up from 323,000 in 2000. Transportation
system capacity limits will not allow 90,000 of
these trips to travel during the peak hour. More
drivers fighting for limited roadway space will add
pressure to an already overburdened roadway
system. For residents and workers of Santa Clara
County, this translates into more congestion, longer
commute times, more stress, and lost productivity.
Not surprisingly, traffic congestion has been identi-
fied as one of the county's most critical issues.
. Air Quality. Until all automobiles are zero-
emission vehicles, they will remain a significant
source of air pollution. While it is difficult to
directly link automobile emissions to health
impacts, studies show that particulate poUution
can cause a variety of health problems, from asthma
attacks to cancer. The environmental impacts of air
pollution are also significant and include global
warming, smog, acid rain, and water pollution.
. Land Consumption and Open Space- Sprawling,
low-density, piecemeal growth places a tremendous
strain on one of our most precious natural resources:
the land itself. As the county evolved from its
agricultural roots to the metropolitan present, fields,
orchards, and grazing lands were converted to such
urban uses as office parks, residential subdivisions,
and shopping malls. Between 1984 and 1998, over
10,800 acres of agricultural land and other open
spaces were paved over for development. This
translates into nearly 2 acres each and every day
during this 14-year period! Aß a result, there are
fewer places to take a walk in nature, fewer vistas of
the pastoral countryside, more soil erosion, and more
water pollution.
. Jobs-Housing Imbalance. Santa Clara County
has historically been job-rich and housing-poor.
And during the rapid economic expansion in the
late 1990s, the county added jobs at four times the
rate of new housing. As of 2000, thejobs-to-employed-
residents ratio has climbed to 1.16, creating over
235,000 so-called 'incommuters' who work in Santa
Clara County but live elsewhere. The number of
incommuters is expected to rise to over 284,000 by
2020. The jobs-housing imbalance both increases
traffic congestion on Santa Clara's roadways and
causes home prices to skyrocket. In July 2000, the
median price of a single-family home in Santa Clara
County was $547,000-far beyond the means of most
of the county's workers.
, Sense of Place. While difficult to measure,
a 'sense- of-place' speaks to the identity we feel in
associating ourselves to our communities. In Santa
Clara County, it is becoming increasingly difficult
to hold on to a unique sense-of-place while
auto-dominated, anonymous shopping centers,
cookie-cutter housing developments, and faceless
office parks that continue to sprout up here.
..
~
i
COMMUNITY DESIGN ,; TR~RI.-,\nQ!.L__?'.L
low",enslty resIdentIal development consumes huge swaths of Ihe county's open space and agrIcultural land.
THE ULTIMATE COST: OUR QUALITY OF LIFE
These negative impacts ultimately translate into a
decline in our quality oflife. Residents and workers are
spending mare time commuting to work and less time
for family. friends, recreation, and community. Traffic
congestion throughout the day, not just during peak
commute times, is getting worse. The open space we
treasure, which gives the Valley its identity, is harder
and harder to find and to get to.
Indeed, what is at risk here is the quality of life that
makes Santa Clara County warth living and doing
business in: a robust economy, affordable housing,
proximity to an educated and talented workforce,
unique communities, accessible open spaces, and a
clean environment. This high quality of life is a
primary reason that many fITms chose to locate in
Santa Clara County.
Unfortunately, a troubling reality is setting in-if the
quality oflife continues to decline, new businesses may
choose to locate in other regions and present firms may
leave for greener pastures. By promoting smart land use
and transportation decisions, the CDT Program can help
improve the quality of life in the county and safeguard
its prosperity.
TraffIc congestIon Is everywhere, wastIng countless hours be«er
spent wIth fomtly, work, or ploy
As outooriented development has boomed, many areas have last their distinctive quoli/ies and our s/reets have became 'place-Iess:
CONTINUED GROWTH
Because of the advantages offered by Silicon Valley's unique concentration of high.technology firms, Santa Clara
County will continue to experience significant growth over the next 20 years, as shown in the table below. Growth
is coming; of that there's little doubt. The question remaining is /WW it will came. It has became inescapably clear
that Santa Clara County needs to find more sustainable ways to grow.
PROJECTED POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT GROWTH: SANTA CLARA COUNTY Source: A8AG Projections 2000
2000 2020 % change 2000-2020
I POPULATION 1.76 million 2.02 million 14.8%
¡" 0.57 million 0.69 million
HOUSEHOLDS 21.0%
EMPLOYED RESIDENTS 0.93 miilion 1.14 miilion 22.6%
J08S 1.08 million 1.31 million 21.3%
VTP 2020 caUs for changing the way we respond to growth in the planning of our land use and transportation.
Expansion of the roadway system alone is not an adequate response to the county's continuing growth. Over the
next 20 years, freeway capacity is expected to increase only 4%, compared wtth a population increase of 15% and
an employment increase of 21%. Multimodal transportation solutions linked with strategic land use policies will
be essential to ensure the county's ability to keep pace with change.
~
i
...0,-- COM M U NIT UfSLGH.&..l1UlliSP.QB,U1.YLQN...JJ.L
WHERE DO WE WANT TO BE IN 20 YEARS?
Cities and towns across the county, the region, and the
country are realizing that our business-as-usual approach
to growth has contributed to unwanted impacts on our
quality of life, and are looking for new ways to grow.
Scattered throughout our own county are examples of
smart investments, good design, and responsibly coordinated
development. Some are large projects such as the new
combined VTA and Caltrain Station in downtown Mountain
View, the clusters of high-density housing in downtown San
Jose, and The Crossings, a pedestrian-oriented development
near the San Antonio Caltrain Station in Mountain View.
Others are small but equally noteworthy interventions, such
as the daycare center at the Tamien CaltrainlLight Rail
Station.
These projects capture the spirit of CDT: well-designed,
high-density, mixed-use development along streets that can be
reached by many travel modes. They are effectively integrated
with their surroundings and include conveniently accessible
transit stops, usable and attractive sidewa1ks, and building
and landscape elements on a human scale. In short, they
show us what our cities and neighborhoods can look like if
we approach new development with sensitivity to mobility
options, context, design, and the people who will live and
work there.
Sac Jose has eccouroged housicg developmect dowctowc,
withic 0 short wolk 01 jobs, ectertoinmect, and tronsi/.
In Mountain View, The Crossings broughl on attractive mix of higher densities, pedestrian
omenilies, and transit orientation to the housing market-and succeeded.
A childcore facility at Ihe Tomien
Intermodal Station eliminates on
extra trip for many parents.
/-
;--
Mixed'JSe development makes downlowns places 10 be. Downtown Palo Alia, one of Ihe 'Cores' identified by VTP 2000.
Some improvements can happen at a project level by focusing on goad site planning and building design. Other
improvements may require changes to local codes and standards, such as modifying level-of-service vehicle traffic
standards to enable a well-designed project to meet requirements, or permitting more flexible zoning to allow
higher density and mixed uses in selected locations. Still others may require regional coordination on projects
with regional impacts or systemic and institutional changes such as overhauling financial structures that promote
inefficient single-use development. In all cases, the keys to implementation of CDT are a common understanding of
the program's goals and objectives and a commitment to ongoing efforts to achieve them.
RESULTS OF A NATIONAl SURVEY ON GROWTH AND DEVElOPMENT
s..n.: s...i1Gnow' ""'"'"1999
I . 85% favor an In""se in coordinated ellorl> among ¡uri,dle/ions to plan lor growill
. 83% 10'01 ..ta~I,hing zon.. for green 'p"e, lorming and loresb oublde of urban ore05
'81% lavor ,he ,tate ga"mment gi,lng f,"dingprlorl~ to maintain ""ices, such 05 "hools and roods, in existing communitiesrother iIIan in new growth areas
. 78% support land use planning to guide the place and size 01 d"elopme.1
. 77% support the use 01 slate tronsportotion lunds for public "onsportotion
In San Jose, I 0 I San Fernanda represents a new generolion of Downlown housing that brings residenls close 10 transit and urban amenities.
...
I
~QMM!)NITY DESIGN "~EQRIAI!Ql'LJJl
VTA Cores, Corridors
& Station Areas
. 8 .
Local County Regional
Core Core Core
till' Corridors
. Stotion Areas
... BART Stations
. Coltroin and/or
ACE Stations
Regional Rail Transit Lines
~ VTA Light Rail Lines
and Stations
This map shows VTA's priorities for supporting
concentrated development in cores, colTidors and station
areas. The map includes areas where transportation
investments can support concentrated development but
where member agency policy is not presently explicitly
supportive of VTA land use objectives.
NEW FRONTIERS FOR GROWTH: CORES, CORRIDORS, AND STATION AREAS
Previously untouched lands at the urban fringe have generally been thought of as leading candidates for development.
However, Santa Clara County's mature urban areas also represent prime development opportunities. In fact, sites
that are vacant or currently underutilized offer advantages over outlying areas because they are already served by
urban services and infrastructure. Furthermore, accommodating growth in already built.up areas plays a critical
role in the protection of valuable open space at the edge. These areas constitute the new frontiers for growth, and
are the focus of CDT, and support for this vision is growing among county residents. A recent survey found that
more than half of Santa Clara County residents preferred to see compact, transit-oriented housing rather than
conventional, lower.density development-a significant shift from earlier surveys.
In VTP 2020, VTA and its Member Agencies identified potential future growth areas and defined them as Cores,
Corridors, and Station Areas. These areas are the most likely to benefit from intensification and represent
key opportunities for providing multimodal transportation alternatives that can serve the needs of new residents
and workers. A recent voter-approved tax measure will enable VTA to invest billions of dollars in transportation
improvements in the coming decades- Such an enormous commitment compels us to ensure careful and thorough
coordination with land use policy, especially along multimodal corridors that offer transportation choices beyond
the automobile.
, Cores are districts that contain concentrations of residential areas, employment sites, and other destinations
such as retail and cultural facilities. They are further distinguished as regional cores such as Downtown San
Jose and Palo Alto/Stanford, county cores such as Downtown Mountain View and Gilroy, or local cores such as
San Jose's Willow Glen or downtown Los Gatos.
. Corridors are linear in shape, are centered on a single street or transit line, and often function as the 'spine' of
the surrounding community. Examples of corridors include N 1st Street, EI Camino Real, Stevens Creek
Boulevard, and Capitol Avenue and Expressway.
, Station Areas are locations adjacent to rapid transit stations that already serve or will serve as a focal point for
new development-
Techcology firms, wch os Adobe Syslems Icc. ic dowclowc
Son Jose, ore increasingly looking 10 core oreas for occess 10
housicg, Iransil, and urban omenilies.
.~
I
___J_l? --- ("I:,\ M\,I_NJJ..Y.l).!?21G~LUR,t\mf.Q.Illi'.I[QN ---..".
Ground-110m reloil complemenls offices or residecliol unils above,
providing convenienl services and bringing life 10 Ihe s/reel.
BUILDING BLOCKS FOR CHANGE
PRINCIPLE 1. TARGET GROWTH TO CORES, CORRIDORS
AND STATION AREAS
Focusing growth on cores, corridors, and station areas is
about doing more with less. New growth in these areas
capitalizes on existing investments in infrastructure,
including roade and highwaya, transit and other public
facilities such as water and sewer lines. An added bonus
of infill and redevelopment of existing areas is that it can
divert growth away from the urban fringe, conserving
open space and natural areas. Moreover, focusing growih
to these areas may reduce the need for local governments
to build-and maintain-costly new infrastructure.
~..'-'--c~
:"~."'<.....'.
"'::~..413.'
"':æ'
Torge/ing geowth to existing coce meas uses "soueces moce effi-
dently, makes 1m mme vibeant cammunities. and "I;eves develop-
ment pressuee on autlying Geeenfieid meos,
PRINCIPLE 2. INTENSIFY LAND USE AND ACTIVITIES
Compact development is a key feature of places that are
vibrant and functional. While not appropriate every-
where, higher intensities of uses, strategically placed on
less land, particularly in cores, corridors and station
areas, create the critical mass of activity that is necessary
to cultivate viable transportation options, and ultimately,
a sense-of'place. Higher-intensity land uses also help to
make places willable. Where people can walk, transit
thrives, nearby businesses flourish, street and public
spaces, come to life. Regardless of the location, high-
quality urban design and architecture must accompany
planning for higher densities to make these places
feel comfortable, attractive, and safe for residents
and visitors.
Highee dens;'ies moke eff¡dent use of land, suppml tconsit. and
being a conge of housing Iypes inlo the mocket.
PRINCIPLE 3. PROVIDE A DIVERSE MIX OF USES
Providing a mix of compatible uses within close proximity
of each other can reduce the need for automobile trips and
enhance community livability. For instance, when
housing, offices, and retail shops are within walking
distance, residents and workers can accomplish their
daily business without using their cars, and are
presented with the option to live near their jobs.
A natural consequence is that activities occur all day and
M;xed usas being activiiy to the steeet theoughout the doy, ond
peovide services whee. people live ond woek.
J.
i
~MMUNITY DfSIGN.&.lRåMS.E'.QJilMJ.Ql:-L_lZL
people start walking around the neighborhood,
necessary conditions for creating quality places. A
diverse trip type and ridership base also makes all-
day transit service more worthwhile to provide. The
cores, corridors and station areas represent excellent
opportunities for this kind of mixing.
PRINCIPLE 4. DESIGN FOR PEDESTRIANS
The hallmark of great places is space that feels good to
walk through: great places are appealing to people on
foot. Therefore, a central principle of the CDT
Program is to design for pedestrians. The program
focuses on designing the entire built environment,
from streets and sidewalks to buildings to civic spaces,
as comfortable and interesting human-scale environ-
ments. This principle, combined with a diverse mix of
uses and high-quality design, helps to create synergies
that encourage walking, make transit more attractive,
and enliven public spaces.
New developments should be designed to create vibrant walk
environments.
PRINCIPLE 5. DESIGN IN CONTEXT
Design that pays attention to the local context helps
communities create a unique identity and establish a
coherent, continuous urban fabric. Design in context
means that the materials, design details, and archi-
Archi/ecturol and urbon design styles should reHecl ond reinforce
their surroundings - this image suggest whol nol to do
tural styles reflect and reinforce the unique character of
the region and are appropriate for the neighborhood. But
not just for buildings; streets, sidewalks, and civic
spaces like urban parks, which are the public face of the
community, also deserve the same design rigor. Design
in context is also about forging connections by paying
attention to the physical relationships between
buildings, and between buildings and the public spaces
that surround and connect them.
PRINCIPLE 6. FOCUS ON EXISTING AREAS
Direct greater attention toward using land already
dedicated to the urban fabric more efficiently before
consummg additional land in outlying areas. ¡nfill devel-
opment, redevelopment, and brownfield sites in cores,
corridors and station areas throughout the county are
The 'Crossings' infill proiect in Moun/oin View. converted on
underutilized shopping center into 0 new neighborhood with 0
mix of housing types in close proximity 10 Ironsit and shopping.
ideal opportunities for accommodating new growth in a
way that simultaneously strengthens existing commu-
nities and preserves open space. Urban infill allows
existing communities to grow organically, project.by-
project, creating places of lasting value that continue to
mature and improve over time. But sustaining is just as
important as strengthening; after-care and mainte-
nance programs are as vital as good planning and
design for fostering sense-of-place and community. This
is especially important with regard to the pedestrian
environment, where people interact closely with their
surroundings and notice details such as landscaping
and pavement condition.
PRINCIPLE 7. CREATE A MULTIMODAL
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
Great places are ones that offer a multitude of ways to
get around. The county's best response to growing con-
gestion is to offer residents and workers the option to
walk, bike, or take transit to reach their destinations.
A mul/imodol system meons providing lacilities lor pedestrians and
bikes, as well os for cars.
Provision of viable transportation alternatives is not
about removing the automobile; rather, it is about
balancing the needs of all modes. It requires invest-
ments to be made that work toward not just a compre-
hensive transit network, but also a complementary
system of continuous pedestrian ways and an intercon-
nected bicycle system. In particular, streets playa
central role in the success of a multimodal system; they
are not always just for cars. Some roads will give
prominence to the automobile and movement of freight,
while others will focus on transit service and the pedes-
trian environment. The final outcome is an intergrated
street system that serves all users well, regardless of
their mode of traveL
PRINCIPLE 8. ESTA8L1SH STREETS AS PLACES
In addition to being part of the multimodal transporta-
tion system that moves people and goods, streets are
the most abundant public space in cities. Indeed, they
are an integral part of a community's urban space and
Streets con hove multiple functions, serving os on extension of the sur-
rounding land uses as well as moving tralfic.
identity, the settings for childhood game-playing,
evening strolls, and neighborly chats. Rather than
being viewed ae just thoroughfares for cars, streets
need to also be designed in context with their adjacent
land uses. Planning for these multiple purposes
requires changing the way we think of streets. It calls
for street and street system design that distributes
traffic load among more, skinnier, streets, rather than
saddling a few, wide streets with it. This strategy
avoids overburdening any single street and allows for
better attention to community-oriented design
elements, such as wide interconnected sidewalks,
public landscaping and street trees.
LAND AREA DEVOno TO THE AUTOMOBILE
'Inorben"eos,251030percontoflandorealstypicollydevoled
losl,..ts ondanolher 20 p"cont 10 off'str..t p"king. In 2000,
opproxlmalely 100,000 acres were devoted to s'r..ts ond packing
In Santa Claca County.
'Eachautamabiledemandso/leost4packlngspacos, 1 athame,
1 al wack, eneotthe mall and aneon Iheraadway. WIth 1,130,000
cors registered In the Caunly in 2000 plus and estimated 230,000
In'commulers [who n..d somewhat less than 4 spacosl, this "",Iates
to abaut 5 mmian packing spocos in the county - ac am 60 square
miles af packing alone!
'P"vidlngpacklnglaclhecorsassaciatedwi/hpoa¡ec/edgoaw/h
by2020willrequlreenotherllsquoremilesolland-Ihal'sequolin
"eo to an entire city the si.. 01 Cupertino.
.,
t
COMMUNITY DESIGN !\ TP.llli.:æ.QRIl\.ILO1'L~~L
PRINCIPLE 9. INTEGRATE TRANSIT
It is often the case that transit is relegated to the
periphery of urban spaces, outside soundwalls or at
the edge of high-speed roads. But only when transit is
fully integrated with the community can it function
effectively. Integration can be achieved either by
extending community fabric out to connect with transit
facilities, or by bringing transit service directly into the
center of the community. For instance, light rail
stations can become the heart of a community when
surrounded by intense, mixed land uses, well-designed
buildings, and high-quality pedestrian pathways.
Thoughtful bus stop location and design, combined
with signal and roadway improvements that assist
operations, can give bus transit the same sense ofper-
manence and reliability as rail transit. In all cases,
integrating transit involves designing for pedestrians
In oddition 10 its buildings ond stree/s. 0 well-designed transit
system will be an integral port of a place's identity.
and considering the form and location of transit early
in the design process.
PRINCIPLE 10. MANAGE PARKING
Managing parking is a vital component of the CDT
Program because it affects both the built environment
and the transportation system. Parking is perhaps the
single most important element influencing the design
of urban areas, taking up enormous amounts of land,
and increasing project cast, and constraining project
design. The treatment of parking helps dictate the
character of a place, determining whether it will feel
isolated from adjacent uses, or integrated into a contin-
uous urban fabric. Parking is also a strong determining
i
_~L2Q -- _S:Qty\.MtJr,¡nUj¡SJm'lH[?,m'i~¡>..Q.!n!\lJQ!oL__>.
The provision of free porking encourages drive<Jlone commuting,
consumes large tracks of Iond. worsens air quality, and increases
development casts.
factor affecting travel mode choice. High parking avail-
ability especially when free, promotes drive-alone
commuting. A key to realizing the CDT vision is to
manage parking in a way that does not dominate made
choice decisions or the built environment: like locating
parking to the rear or side of buildings, hiding parking
within buildings as shared-use garages, or sponsoring
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs
that make other transportation modes more attractive
than driving alone.
1¡'~PlfMfNTiNG "E5T PRACnCE5
"THE SIGNIFICANT PROBLEMS WE FACE CANNOT BE SOLVED WITH THE SAME LEVEL OF THINKING WE WERE AT
WHEN WE CREATED THEM."
The ideas and principles embodied in the CDT Program are widely
accepted and have few opponents. Developers often state that they would
like to build Best Practice-type projects. Yet projects that embrace such
principles encounter numerous hurdles in the approval process.
Government policies and processes have not kept pace with our new
attitudes. A look at our institutional structure suggests five key areas
where obstacles to implementing Best Practices exist.
, Local zoning regulations: Inflexible codes and rigid land use classifi-
cations typically encourage low-density,large-lot developments, result in
separation of uses, eliminate possibilities for mixed-use, and do not ade-
quately recognize special conditions such as proximity to multimodal
streets or transit corridors.
. Rigid transportation standards: Traffic engineering and street
design standards are based on 'peak' usage by automobiles and often do
not make provisions for bicycles and pedeetrians. Parking requirements,
too, are set for peak use and rarely take into account alternative travel
modes that good design can encourage.
. Lack of focus on urban design: Individual buildings and develop-
ments are often designed as self-contained "units," with almost no
acknowledgement of their surroundings. Without urban design guide-
lines, new projects are unable to unite to form a continuous urban fabric.
. Rinancial and Regulatory systems: Lenders strongly favor estab-
lished models of development, and are often reluctant to finance projects
that incorporate new ideas. Also, compliance with certain VTA and
member agency policies sometimes precludes application of these princi-
ples. Aß an example, rigid LOS standards preclude higher densities in
already built-up areas even if there is high transit use. Procedures to
overcome these obstacles can be onerous, costly, and time-consuming.
. Permitting and approval process: Projects incorporating Best
Practices features can encounter resistance in the approval process
because they do not conform to current zoning regulations. The process
of obtaining permission to incorporate Best Practices elements can delay
project approvals and increase project costs.
- Albert Einstein
.-..
Pho/o simulotion showing the evolution of 0 typical
shopping center into 0 tronsit"ppartive mixed
use district.
So.", U,ooo """"'to98
A
I
ì
---_C QMM!J.N1I.XJ¿f5lG.f'Ucl.RAN£e12RIA U Q N 211.
MAKING BEST PRACTICES WORK - WHERE WE GO FROM HERE
Finding ways to overcome these barriers are critical for success. Applying Best Practices wherever possible is
an important fIrst step but it should be accompanied by system-wide changes in process and priority. First and
foremost, we need to consider the land use and transportation link early in the design process, whether in the
design of streets, transit facilities, or development projects. Second, we need to incorporate principles into general
plans and specific plans throughout the county. And third, we need to create and adopt innovations in zoning, regu.
latory, and financial systems as incentives to encourage Best Practices in all new development.
VTP 2020, VTKs new long-range transportation plan, calls for fostering "a high quality of life for Santa Clara
County's residents, and continuing the health of its economy." While we have seen astounding success in the latter,
the former has often eluded us.
CDT PROGRAM ELEMENTS
. Documentation of Best Practices Principles in a comprehensive manual.
. Adoption of the Principles by the VTA Board of Directors.
. Adoption of Resolutions of Commitment by VTA Member Agencies, (cities, towns and county of Santa Clara)
whereby they pledge to incorporate
the Principles and Practices into their planning, design, and approval processes.
. Outreach to spread the word about CDT through workshops, presentations, and newsletters.
. Updates to the Best Practices Principles and manual to incorporate our evolving understanding ofland use
and transportation interactions.
. Provision of structure and framework that supports VTKs ongoing Transit-Oriented Development,
Design Enhancements Program for VTP 2020, and Development Review activities, and other land use efforts.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Board of Directors
Ron Gonzales
Chairperson, Mayor
City of San Jose
David D. Cortese
Councilmember
City of San Jose
Jane P. Kennedy
Wce Chairperson/
Councilmember
City of Campbell
Pat Dando
Councilmember
City of San Jose
Blanca Alvarado
Supervisor
County of Santa Clara
Don Gage
Supervisor
County of Santa Clara
Cindy Chavez
Councilmember
City of San Jose
Dena Mossar
Councilmember
City of Palo Alto
Board Member Alternates
Francis La Poll
Mayor
City of Los Altos
Joe Pirzynski
Councilmember
'lbwn of Los Gatos
Jim Lawson
Councilmember
City of Milpitas
Ken Yeager
Councilmember
City of San Jose
Pete McHugh
Supervisor
County of Santa Clara
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
Peter M. Cipolla
General Manager
Chris Augenstein
Principal Transportation Planne~
CDT Program Manage~
Congestion Management Program
Michael P. Evanhoe
Chief Development Officer
Carolyn Gonot
Deputy Directo~ Congestion
Management Program
Judy Nadler
Mayor
City of Santa Clara
Thomas Springer
Mayor
City of Gilroy
Manuel Valerio
Councilmember
City of Swmyvale
Forrest Williams
Councilmember
City of San Jose
Ex-OHicio Members
James T. Beall, Jr.
Supervisor
County of Santa Clara
John McLemore
Santa Clara County Cities
Association Representative to MTC
¿ V~liey'Tn:n's~:rÎalion Authority
Part of every trip yflU take
3331 North First Street
San Jose, CA 95134.1927
(408) 321.2300
TOO only (408) 321.2330
emai/: cdt@vta.org
o1/05~3474 2500
Cjl1 A.
!~.~
..iI~'
~.,.
GodbeResearch & Analysis
Survey of Residents
Conducted for:
The City of Cupertino
September 4, 2002
60 Stone Pine Road
Half Moon Bay CA 94019-1739
Phone 65<11712-3137
Fax6501712-3131
95 South Market Stree\ Suite 300 445 South Figueroa Stree\ 2600
San Jose CA 95113-2350 Los Angeles CA9007l-163!
Phone 408/2B8-9232 Phone 213/624-8863
Fax 40&'288-9212 Fax 2131624-8864
640 GrandAvenue, Suite G
Car~had CA 9200~2365
Phone 760/730-2941
Fax 7601720-4706
"'=ti"Summ"y
Executive Summary
Key Findings
Based on an analysis of the survey data, GRA offers the following key findings:
Overall Evaluation of Cupertino
Residents were asked why they chose to live in the City of Cupertino. TIlls question was pre-
sented in an open-ended fonnat, which means that respondents were free to mention any
attribute without being constrained to choose from a list. Once data collection was complete,
responses were coded into logical categories. Among the specific reasons mentioned by
respondents, 'School system' was mentioned most frequently, followed by 'Job', 'Friends!
family', 'Enjoyllike the City', and 'Affordable housing'.
The next question in the survey asked respondents what were the two most important issues
facing Cupertino. This question was also presented in an open-ended fonnat. The most
important issue facing Cupertino was 'Education', followed closely by 'Affordable housing'.
However, a substantial portion of residents 'Don't know', while other participants felt 'Man-
aging traffic' and 'Controlling growth' were the most important issues.
Evaluation of City Service!!
A sizable majority of Cupertino residents indicated that they were either 'very satisfied' or
'somewhat satisfied' with the job that the City of Cupertino is doing to provide municipal
services. Less than one in ten residents were either 'somewhat dissatisfied' or 'very dissatis-
fied' witll the job that the City is doing. The remaining five percent were undecided or
declined to state their opinions. Compared with GRA's other municipal clients in California,
the level of satisfaction expressed by residents of Cupertino was slightly above average.
Residents who have lived in Cupertino for a relatively longer period of time were more likely
to be 'very satisfied' than were those who have lived in Cupertino for a relatively shorter
period oftime. Specifically, 46 percent of those who have in Cupertino for 10 years or more
were 'very satisfied'. In contrast. only 40 percent of those who have lived there for less than
10 years were 'very satisfied'. However, it should be noted that residents who have lived in
Cupertino for less than 10 years reported being 'somewhat satisfied' more often than those
who have lived in the City longer.
Respondents located in 'Northeast' Cupertino were the most satisfied with the overall job the
City was doing to provide city services. Those respondents residing in the 'Northwest' and
'Southwest' also reported relatively high satisfaction ratings as well. Residents in the 'South-
east' quadrant gave lower satisfaction ratings than their counterparts in other areas of the
City.
The next question asked residents to identify the level of importance for different municipal
services. Cupertino residents considered 'Police Services', 'Garbage Collection', and 'Traffic
City o¡Cupertino
Godbe Research & Analysis
Page2
Executive Summary
Safety', as the most important services provided by the City, followed by 'Library Services',
'Recycling Program', 'Street Pavement Maintenance', and 'Sidewalk Maintenance'. The
'City website', 'The Public Aœess Channel', and 'The Government Meeting Channel' were
considered the least important city services of the municipal services tested in the survey.
Respondents were also asked to identify their level of satisfaction with the different City ser-
vices. Residents in Cupertino showed a moderate level of satisfaction with most of the
municipal services tested in the survey. Specifically, Cupertino residents were most satisfied
with the City's efforts to provide 'Library services', followed by 'Quillian Community Center
facilities', 'Park and picnic area maintenance', and 'Police services'. Respondents were less
than 'somewhat satisfied' with 'The public access channel', 'The Government Meeting
Channel', 'Traffic safety', and 'Economic development efforts'.
GRA also examined the importance and satisfaction rating of each service relative to the
overall average importance and satisfaction ratings of all services. The average level of sat-
isfaction was divided by the average level of importance for each service. The resulting ratio
describes the relationship between satisfaction and importance, and is an indication of the
level of satisfaction for a given level of importance. The higher the score for a given service,
the less need the residents feel there is for the City to focus on improving the provision of that
service. Conversely, the lower the satisfaction-importance ratio, the greater the need for the
City to improve that service. Because each service was rated using the same scale within
importance and satisfaction measures, satisfaction-importance ratios can be meaningfully
compared for each service. Based on the comparison between the importance and satisfac-
tion ratings, the following areas offer the greatest opportunity for improvement: 'Manage
traffic safety', 'Economic development efforts', 'Street pavement maintenance', 'Sidewalk
maintenance', and 'Recycling program'.
Examining the importance and satisfaction scores also affords an opportunity to identify
which City services should at least be maintained at the level they are at now (Le., those ser-
vices that received high importance and high satisfaction scores). These services included
'Library services', 'Garbage collection', and 'Police services'.
When participants of the study were asked if they believed there were any services not cur-
rently provided by the City that should be, 71 percent believed that the current services pro-
vided by the City were sufficient A follow-up question was presented in an open-ended
format, which allowed those respondents who stated that current services were not sufficient
to identify those services that should be offered by the City. Suggestions for possible services
to be provided varied widely. In turn, the 'Other' categorY was left with the largest amount of
suggestions. 'Expand cleaning/maintenance', 'Affordable housing', 'Teen programs', and
'rhe 'Other' category is aoollection of reaponses that, each, separately, accounted/Dries:; than one percent In the overall
sample.
Ciiy of Cuperlirw
Godbe Research & A1raJ)'ir
Page3
""",""Summ,'1'
'School improvement programs' were all frequently mentioned services that could be pro-
vided. Some respondents could not recommend a new service the City could provide, while
others believed 'Safety services' and 'Expand public transit' would be important additions to
the currently provided services.
Parks and Reaeation
Results from questions presented earlier in the survey showed that 'City Recreation Services'
was rated more than 'somewhat Important' by Cupertino residents. Respondents were then
asked about their general satisfaction with the programs and activities offered by tlle Recre-
ation Department. The majority of Cupertino residents were either 'very' or 'somewhat' satLI-
fied with the recreation activities and programs offered by the Recreation Department.
Approximately five percent of residents were dissatisfied either 'very' or 'somewhat' and 28
percent did not reveal their opinion.
Respondents' satisfaction with Cupertino's programs and activities offered by the Recreation
Department were then examined while conSidering their area of residence, age, and ethnic-
ity. Residents in the 'Northwest' quadrant were the most satisfied, followed by those in the
'Southwest', and then 'Southeast' quadrant. Residents in the 'Northeast' were the least satis-
fied with the programs and activities offered by the Recreation Department. Across the age
groups, respondents under the age of 26 and between the ages of 37 and 56, reported the
highest level of satLIfaction with the Recreation Department. Respondents who reported to be
of 'Chinese' and 'Asian Indian' descent, on average, reported higher satisfaction scores witll
the programs and activities offered by the Recreation Department than those who described
themselves as 'White' or 'Other'.
Respondents were then asked whether they or a member of their household had visited spe-
cific parks within Cupertino over the last 12 months. Over three-quarters of respondents
indicated that they or members of their family had visited 'Memorial Park', which was vis-
ited more than any of the other parks tested. The next most visited park was 'Blackberry
Farms', where over 40 percent of respondents indicated that they or members of their family
had visited it in the last twelve months, followed by 'McClellan Ranch Park', 'Creekside
Park', 'Cupertino Sports Center', 'Linda Vista Park' , and 'Jollyman Park'.
If respondents indicated that either they or a member of their household had visited a park
within the 12 months prior of the study, they were then asked about their motivation for vis-
iting City parks. Once again, the question was presented in an open-ended format. Most
respondents reported visiting a park to 'Take a walk'. Many had visited a park to 'Exercise',
'Take children to a playground', or 'Enjoy nature/outdoors'. Others reported a park visit in
order to 'Spend time with friends/family', or 'Have a picnic'. The least frequently mentioned
reasons for a park visit was to 'Take a nap', and 'Read'.
In another open-ended question, respondents were asked where they usually went when they
walk or bike in Cupertino. Forty-six percent of respondents indicated that tlley usually walk
Cüy of cuper/in(¡
Godbe Research & A11il1ysis
Page 4
ExecuûveSummory
or bike to a 'Park or recreation area'. Approximately a third of the respondents said that
when they are walking or biking, they do so 'Around (their) neighborhood', followed by 13
percent that indicated they go 'Shopping/errands/grocery store'. Eight percent of the respon-
dents said 'I don't walk or bike anywhere', and five percent said they walk or bike to 'School'.
PolennalMunidpai ProjeGts
In the first question concerning potential municipal projects, respondents were read several
potential locations for a public sculpture. Residents were then asked which location they
thought to be most appropriate for a sculpture. The iocatioru; that were given were, Quinlan
Community Center, City Hall and the library area, Memorial Park, or one of the neighbor-
hood parks. Thirty-nine percent of the respondents believed that the 'City Hall and library'
would benefit most from the addition of a sculpture. Twenty-five percent thought that a
sculpture should be built in 'Memorial Park', 12 percent indicated 'Quinlan Community
Center', and five percent said 'Other neighborhood park'. Almost one fifth of the respondents
declined to respond to the question, or did not know.
With 49 percent of its residents indicating that the 'City Hall and library' would be the best
location for the addition of a sculpture, the 'Northeast' quadrant held the strongest opinion
of where a sculpture should be built. In addjtion, residents of the 'Southeast' quadrant also
indicated a strong preference for building a sculpture at the 'City Hall and library'.
The next question had respondents indicate their level of support for the City of Cupertino to
use existing City funds to establish a network of paths and roads for people who are walking,
biking, or rollerblading. There was strong support for the proposal, with over 80 percent of
respondents believing that proposal would be a good use of City funds. Approximately 12 per-
cent opposed the idea.
Although, overall, residents indicated strong support for using City funds to establish a net-
work of paths and roads, support was lowest with respondents ages 47 to 56. Respondents
ages 26 and under showed the strongest support for the proposal.
Respondents were informed that building the paths and roads would take away space on
streets and roads currently being used by cars. They were then asked again if they would sup-
port establishing a network of paths and roads for walking, biking, or rollerblading, know-
ing that it would take away space on streets and roads. Support for the proposal decreased 16
percentage points, from approximately 81 to 65 percen~ after the fact that space for streets
and roads for cars would be reduced was taken into consideration. The largest decrease in
support was with respondents 65 and older, with a decrease of approximately 30 percentage
points. Moreover, an inverse relationship emerged between age of respondent and support for
the proposaL More specifically, as age of respondent rose, support for the proposed paths and
roads gradually decreased.
CiJy of cuper/inf!
Godbe Research & Anal)<'ir
Page5
E",.ti"S.mm"Y
Participant¡; were also informed of a proposal involving plans to create a downtown area
along Stevens Creek Boulevard. Three-quarters of respondent¡; supported these plans, which
would include developing benches, trees, and additional shopping opportunities in the area.
Twenty-one percent opposed the idea, and four percent either declined to respond to the
question or did not know.
Respondent¡; were presented with two opposing opinions concerning the future of downtown
Cupertino. They were tl1en asked which opinion was closer to their own. The first option
stated that if the City creates a downtown area along Stevens Creek Boulevard between Stell-
ing Road and De Anza Boulevard, the City should also remove a lane of traffic along Stevens
Creek Boulevard. This would make it easier and safer to walk around the downtown area.
Removing a lane of traffic in each direction would provide additional space for on-street
parking and still leave two lanes in each direction. The second option stated that if the City
creates a downtown area along Stevens Creek Bùulevard between Stelling Road and De Anza
Boulevard, the City shouid do it without removing a iane of traffic along Stevens Creek Bou-
levard. It also suggested that there is room to create a downtown area without removing a
lane of traffic. Removing a lane of traffic in e3£h direction would slow down cars and
increase traffic congestion. After hearing theses opinions, 60 percent of the respondent¡;
agreed with the second opinion, whereas only 26 percent said the first opinion was closer to
their own. A very small portion agreed with 'Both' or 'Some of each', seven percent indicated
'Neither', and four percent did not respond or did not know.
Recycling
Resident¡; were next asked questions focusing on Cupertino resident¡;' experience with the
curbside recycling service the City is proposing. First, respondent¡; were asked if they would
support a proposal for curbside recycling once a week instead of every two weeks. Fifty-five
percent of the resident¡; of Cupertino support increasing curbside recycling service from once
every two weeks to once a week. Eighteen percent 'strongly opposed' the proposal, and 17
percent 'somewhat opposed' the idea.
Residents were then informed that if curbside recycling was done once a week instead of
every two weeks, it would cost them $4 more e3£h month. The next question asked them if
they would support the proposal given the cost increase. After informed of the additional
costs, there was a substantial decrease in support. Approximately 55 percent supported the
proposal prior to learning of the increase in cost, and 38 percent supported it after receiving
the additional information. The largest change in opinion was shown in those respondents
who 'strongly opposed' the proposal with an increase of over 21 percent, from approximately
19 percent to 40 percent.
Crime and Ethnic Relations
The next set of questions in the survey focussed on crime and ethnic relations within Cuper-
tino. Respondents were asked if they felt that crime in the City of Cupertino had increased,
decreased, or stayed about the same in the last five years. Just over half of respondents indi-
cated that they believed crime had 'Stayed about the same'. Twenty-one percent thought
city of Cupertino
Godbe Research & Awrysis
Page 6
F.xecuüVtSummary
crime had 'Increased', and 11 percent felt that it had 'Decreased'. Seventeen percent either
did not respond to the question, or did not have an opinion.
Almost twice the percentage of respondents who own their homes, as opposed to rent,
believed that crime had '1ncreased' in the past five years. Conversely, a much larger percent-
age of those who rent believed that crime had 'Decreased'. In addition, owners believed that
crime had 'Stayed about the same' more than renters. A much higher percentage of males
than females indicated that they felt crime had 'Decreased', and femaies more often than
males said they felt crime had '1ncreased'.
The next series of questions were designed to assess the opinions of residents in the City of
Cupertino on different issues involving ethnicity and the City's efforts to improve race rela-
tions. Respondents were asked how they would rate race and ethnic relations in the City of
Cupertino. Over eighty percent of residents believed that race and ethnic relations in the City
were either 'Excellent' or 'Good'. Nine percent felt that relations were 'Poor', five percent
believed they were 'Very poor', and five percent did not know, or did not give a response.
Ninety-six percent of the residents of Cupertino who indicated a 'Chinese' ethnic background
felt that race and ethnic relations in the City were either 'Excellent' or 'Good'. Respondents
in the 'Other' category reported the lowest combined ratings of 'Excellent' and 'Good'.
Participants were then informed that approximately 49 percent of Cupertino residents are
members of ethnic minority groups. After they were given this information, respondent were
asked how the increased diversity has affected their feelings toward other races. Sixty percent
of the residents imlicated 'No change in how I feel'. Twenty-six percent of the respondents
believed they had become 'More sympathetic/open', 10 percent felt 'More resentfullclosed',
and 5 percent said that they did not know how the diversity had affected them, or did not
respond to the question.
The responses to the question of increased diversity were examined by the ethnic background
of the respondents. 'No change in how I feel' responses were evenly distributed across the dif-
ferent ethnic backgrounds. Consistent with respondents' overall responses to race relations
in the City of Cupertino, higher percentages of 'White' and 'Other' ethnicities reported being
'More resentfuVclosed' than 'Asian Indian' or 'Chinese'. Those indicating that the increased
diversity in the City had made them 'More sympathetic/open' were 'Chinese', followed by
'Asian Indian', 'White', and 'Other'.
When respondents were asked what they thought about the City's effort to improve race rela-
tions in the City of Cupertino, approximately half of the respondents believed it was doing
'About the right amount'. However, 16 percent of the residents believed the City was doing
'Not enough', and 13 percent suggested it was doing 'Too much'. There were also almost
one fifth who indicated that they did not know, or declined to respond to the question.
Cityofcup..1in1J
Godbe Research & AnalJ"S
Pagel
"",outi"Summ")'
Housing and Neighborhood Projects
The City of Cupertino was interested in ascertaining the amount of support residents have in
the building of apartments, condominiums, and townhomes in the area along Stevens Creek
Boulevard from Stelling Road to Wolfe Road. When asked, over half of the respondents
opposed building. Approximately 40 percent of the respondents indicated that they support
building in the areas. Furthennore, a much larger percentage of renters than owners support
the building of apartments, condominiurru;, and townhomes in the area along Stevens Creek
Boulevard.
Follow up questions were asked that attempted to detennine which issues would make resi-
dents more or less likely to support the building of apartments, condominiums and townho-
mes in the City. Of the issues examined, residents would be most likely to support the
building of apartments, condominiurru; and townhomes in the City if it 'Offers affordab1e
housing to those families who cannot afford a single-family residence in this area' followed
by, 'Cuts commuter time by offering housing alternatives for those who choose to live near
their work' and 'Helps local businesses attract workers by offering workers affordab1e conve-
nienthousing'.
The next series of questions asked if residents were aware of different neighborhood pro-
grams. Respondents indicated, overall, that they were most aware of the 'Neighborhood
watch' program, followed by 'Earthquake preparedness', and 'Neighborhood block parties'.
Only ten percent of the residents were aware of 'Electronic Community Alert (E-CAP)'.
When level awareness of programs offered in the neighborhood was examined by city quad-
ran~ differences in levels of awareness were reported for 'Earthquake preparedness' in the
'Southeast', and 'Neighborhood block parties' in the 'Southwest', where residents reported
the highest levels of awareness. In addition, compared to other City quadrants, slightly lower
levels of awareness were reported for the 'Neighborhood watch' program in the 'Southwest'
quadrant.
The levei of awareness of neighborhood programs with residents of the City was also exam-
ined, by age. Overall, respondents ages 57 to 66 were most aware of the neighborhood pro-
grams. Specifically, on average, respondents ages 57 to 66 were most aware of 'Earthquake
preparedness', 'Neighborhood block parties', and 'Electronic Community Alert Program'.
Respondents ages 36 and under reported the lowest level of awareness of the neighborhood
programs, overall.
Respondents were next asked to identify their level of satisfaction with the neighborhood pro-
grams. All of the programs received overall relative satisfaction ratings of, at least, 'some-
what satisfactory'. The 'Neighborhood watch' program received the highest ratings, followed
by 'Earthquake preparedness', and 'Neighborhood block parties'. 'Electronic Community
Alert (E-CAP) , received the lowest satisfaction ratings.
City ofCuper#no
Godbe Resem-ch & Ana(J«i1
PageS
Information Dissemination in
Cupertino
l.xe<:uti"Sumrna'Y
Satisfaction ratings of the neighborhood programs was then examined by City quadrant and
age. With regards to age, much lower satisfaction ratings were given to the programs, over-
all, by respondents 26 and under, followed by respondents ages 27 to 36 and 37 to 46. In gen-
eral, respondents over the age of 47 gave higher satisfaction ratings for the neighborhood
programs than those under the age of 47.
In order to find out how residents gathered information about City issues, events, and ser-
vices in the City of Cupertino, respondents were asked to indicate the information sources
they used. The Cupertino Scene was the source that respondents predominantly used to find
out about local news and programming, followed by the Cupertino Courier and 'Other'. A
smaller number of respondents reported using the 'City website' and 'Television'. The San
Francisco Chronicle and 'E-mail' were the source least used by residents.
When residents were asked where they accessed the Internet, most of respondents reported
accessing the Internet at 'Home', followed by 'Work', 'School', and the 'Public library'. Nine
percent of the respondents indicated that they did not access the Internet.
The survey results show that 9 I percent of Cupertino residents had access to the Internet.
Respondents who had accessed the Internet were then asked whether they had visited the
City's web site. Close to 60 percent of Cupertino's residents had never visited the City's web
site. Thirty-nine percent of respondents reported visiting the City website at least once, and
three percent either did not answer the question, or did not know. Overall, the largest per-
centage of respondents who had not visited the website were over the age of 57.
Residents were then asked whether they or any members in their household had ever
watched the Cupertino Government Channel on television. Fifty-nine percent of Cupertino's
residents indicated that neither they nor anyone in their household had ever watched the
channel. Forty percent of respondents had watched the Cupertino Government Charmel at
least once, and I percent either did not know, or declined to answer. The majority of respon-
dents who indicated they had watched the Cupertino Government Charmel were aged 47 or
older. Seventy-five percent of residents 26 and younger had never watched the channel.
Residents were then asked, if given a choice, would they prefer the City of Cupertino to hold
Town Hall meetings on the weekend or during the week. Forty-five percent of residents indi-
cated that they would prefer to have Town Hall meetings held on the 'Weekend'. In contrast,
32 percent said they would prefer to have them held during the week. Approximately one
fifth of the residents had 'No preference' what day of the week they were held. Furthermore,
residents preferred time for Town Hall meetings, whether on weekdays or weekends, would be
from '6pm to 8 pm'. The second most favored time was in the mornings from '9 am to 12
pm' ,followed by '12 pm to 3 pm', and '3 pm to 6 pm' (8%).
City ofcV{!ertioo
Godbe Resem'CfJ & Analyris
Page9
Comparison of results from the May
2000 survey
City Satis/qctian
Traffic Safely and other Areas tv
focus improvement
Issues of Importance
""'"tl..S"mm"y
Conclusions & Recommendations
Based on the research objectives for this study and the findings of the analyses, GRA is
pleased to offer the following conclusions and recommendations:
In May of 2000, GRA completed a resident survey for the City of Cupertino that included
many of the same questions that were asked in the current survey. For those questions asked
in both studies, the results were generally similar. Results from both the May 2000 survey
and the current survey showed:
. 87 percent of Cupertino residents stated they were either 'very' or 'somewhat' satisfied
with City's overall effort to provide municipal services.
. Less than five percent of Cupertino residents stated they were either 'very' or 'somewhat'
dissatisfied with the park and recreation activities and program¡; offered by the City.
. Over 80 percent of Cupertino residents stated that race and ethnic relations in the City
were either 'Excellent' or 'Good'.
As stated above, Cupertino residents remained quite satisfied with the City of Cupertino's
overall efforts to provide municipal services. A large majority of residents in the City were
either 'very satisfied' (43%) or 'somewhat satisfied' (44%) with the City in general. Cuper-
tino residents also expressed a fairly high level of satisfaction with the specific city services
examined in the survey including library services, park and recreation services, and senior
citizen program¡;. Of the 22 municipal services examined in the survey, eighteen received a
satisfaction rating of higher than 1.00, indicating that, on average, Cupertino residents were
more than 'somewhat satisfied' with over eighty percent of the different municipal services
examined in the survey.
By providing their perceived importance of, as well as their level of satisfaction with, the
municipal services, Cupertino residents identified several importMt areas where the City has
an opportunity to improve service provision. Traffic safety along with garbage collection and
police services were seen as having the highest level of importance when compared to the
other municipal services examined in the survey. However traffic safety unlike garbage col-
lection and police services received a relatively low satisfaction rating, with only economic
development efforts receiving a lower level of satisfaction. Traffic safety followed by eco-
nomic development efforts and street pavement maintenance provide an excellent opportu-
nity for the City of Cupertino to make a few specific improvements with certain municipal
services, that residents perceive as important, while building on the strong overall satisfac-
tion that residents share for the City of Cupertino.
For the most part, residents' concerns about the most important issues facing Cupertino
have not changed substantially from the previous survey conducted by GRA in May of 2000.
City ofcuperli1w
Godbe ReseardJ & Ana(rm
Page 10
Popular proposals for improving the
City of Cupertino
Ethnic Relations
Executive Summary
Education is still an important issue with Cupertino residents--over a quarter of all residents
claim it to be the most important issue facing Cupertino in both the current SUITer and the
survey completed two years ago. However, unlike other GRA municipal clients, issues related
to traffic and affordable housing have become less important to residents over the last two
years. The percentage of respondents who stated 'Affordable housing' was the most impor-
tant issue facing the community dropped by approximately 11 percent from 37 percent to 26
percent Traffic related issues faced a similar drop in importance among residents with 33
percent stating it was the most important issue in May of 2000 with current survey only
revealing 20 percent of respondents mentioning that issue. Controlling growth saw the larg-
est increase in residents who mentioned it as the most important issue facing Cupertino,
with five percent of respondents stating it was the most important in May of 2000 to 16 per-
cent in the current study.
The proposal to establish a network of paths and roads for walking and biking within the
City as well as the creation of a downtown area along Stevens Creek boulevard were warmly
received by Cupertino residents. Over 80 percent of residents initially supported the idea of
establishing a network of paths and roads with the City. This level of support only dropped by
about 15 percent when it was added that this network of paths and roads would take space
away from areas designated for automobiles. Support for a newly created downtown area
along Stevens Creek boulevard received similar levels of support with three out of every four
residents supporting the proposal. In general, residents agree that both of these proposals
will improve the City of Cupertino.
As it was two years ago, race and ethnic relations remain an important issue within the City
of Cupertino. The overall perception of race relations in Cupertino has not changed signifi-
cantly with over 80 percent of residents stating they are either 'good' or 'excellent'. However
there were some results from the current survey that should be considered regarding race
relations in Cupertino. Respondents who claimed to be 'Caucasian / White' or 'Other' were
much more likely to state that race relations in Cupertino were either poor or very poor.
These findings do not indicate that race relations are worsening in Cupertino only that cer-
tain ethnic groups tend.to perceive the current conditions of race relations in the City differ-
ently.
City of cupertino
Godbe R- & Analysi<
Page II
CITY OF
CUPEIQ1NO
Community Congress
May 3, 2002
Summary Report
General Plan Update
BUILDING COMMUNITY
3
CITY Of
CUPEIQ1NO
Community Congress
May 3, 2002 Summary Report
General Plan Update
BUILDING COMMUNITY
Sponsored by the Cupertino City Council
Mayor Richard Lowenthal
Vice Mayor Michael Chang
Council Member Sandra James
Council Member Patrick Kwok
Council Member DoUy Sandoval
Contents
Tonic Area
Introduction
Walk-Ability, Bike-Ability and Trails
Neighborhoods
Circulation
Environmental Resources / Sustainability
Development Nodes
Commercial and Office Development
Housing
Open Space and Parks
Prepared by:
MIG,lnc.
800 Hearst Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94710
City of Cupertino
.
City Manager's Office
Department of Community Development
Pa"e#
-----_--____n_---------------- I
-----------------_____n__nn- 5
----______n_------------------ 7
n_---------------------------- 11
------------------------------- 15
------------------------------- 17
------------------------------- 21
------------------------------- 23
------------------------------- 25
Introduction
As the City of Cupertino prepares to update its General Plan, community residents
came together to consider, discuss and make recommendations on potential policy
directions or strategies that preserve and enhance the City's environmental,
residential, and commercial assets while improving the quality of life for those who
live and work here. The directions presented in this report resulted from community
participation and will guide and inform the City in updating the General Plan and
implementing it overtime.
This document summarizes the Community Congress that took place on May 3, 2002
at the De Anza College Campus Center. It describes the activities and purpose of the
event and documents community feedback on a set of potential strategies proposed
by the City and presented at the Congress for !mblic review.
Overview of the Objectives of the Congress
In preparing for the Congress, staff from various City departments created a list of
potential strategies pertaining to eight different areas related to Cupertino's growth
and development, community character, transportation and natural resources,
including the following topic areas:
Walk-Ability, Bike-Ability and Trails
Neighborhoods
Circulation
Environmental Resources / Sustainability
Development Nodes
Commercial and Office Development
Housing
Open Space and Parks
Congress attendees expressed their opinions on the potential strategies along a
spectrum ranging from strong agreement to strong disagreement. Possible pros and
cons were listed next to each potential strategy, that is, the implications or trade-offs
that could be associated with the implementation of each. The idea behind these
potential strategies was to provide a structured yet wide range of options participants
could consider, as well as their benefits and costs. Participants voted using sticky
dots indicating their level of agreement on the strategies shown on each poster,
organized by the topics listed above. The dots were later tallied and are summarized
in this report.
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
Community CDngrau, MaJ¡ 3; 2002
Page 1
The General Plan Update
The General Plan is a statement of goals, policies, and programs that guides
Cupertino's long-range development. It is an expression of our community's vision
and priorities and provides a sense of direction. California state law requires each
city to adopt a General Plan. Cupertino adopted its General Plan in 1993. It
encompasses a set of long-range goals for the City's physical and social
development-goals that best meet the needs of its residents. The Plan contains five
elements: land us(}--{:ommunity character, housing, transportation, environmental
resources and public health and safety. It embodies a vision for the City, stating:
"The General Plan foresees a future for Cupertino in which our growth is carefully
managed, thus maintaining and enhancing our quality of life, protecting our natural
heritage and ensuring long-term economic vitality."¡
The City initiated a series of planning events in early 2002 that will culminate in the
fonnulation of a General Plan Update later this year, that echoes the collective vision
of the citizens ofCupertiÐ.o and responds to contemporary demands and issues.
Therefore, the Update is an important step in maintaining a strong, safe, and
prosperous City.
Congress
The Community Congress began at three o'clock in the afternoon of May 3, 2002, at
De Anza College and lasted until approximately eight o'clock that evening. Nearly
200 participants attended. The event began with an open house in which attendees
circulated freely to review the different issue stations and become acquainted with
the policy areas and potential strategies listed on the charts. Participants were given
"topic cards" and received stickers on visiting each of the eight stations. Completed
cards were than returned and entered into a drawing that occurred at the end of the
evening.
The Congress officially commenced with welcoming remarks from Mayor Richard
Lowenthal. Steve Piasecki, the City's Director of Community Development, gave an
overview of the General Plan Update and stressed the importance of community
participation in its creation. Doug Suisman of Suisman Urban Design then presented
a Powerpoint slide show and talk entitled "Building Community and Creating a
Sense of Place," which examined some ofthe concepts and history of community
planning and placed them in the context of Cupertino's history, current assets,
opportunities and challenges. Doug Suisman stressed that if residents want high
quality "places" where people can gather and comfortably interact then the
community must balance the needs of roads, referred to as "paths," in relation to
"place." The presentation was followed by a preview of the evening's activities by
Carolyn Verheyen of Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc. (MIG), who briefed participants
with instructions for the upcoming dot exercise, small group sessions and fmal
reporting of group conclusions.
¡ City of Cupertino website www.cupertino.org
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
Community Congress, May 3, 2002
Page 2
The Dot Exercise and Small Group Sessions
The dot exercise collected and gauged input on potential strategies to be incorporated
into the General Plan Update. Participants were given one dot for each strategy with
which to cast their opinion. They placed the dots according to their level of
agreement or disagreement with each strategy. The exercise encouraged participants
to analyze and "weigh in" on optional policy directions as well as to generate a tally
of Slipper! for each of the identified areas, a collective memory of the event and
results to guide future policy.
Following the dot exercise, participants broke into two, hour-long, small group
sessions on the eight issue areas and discussed the results of the dot exercise and
suggested new strategies that should be considered in the overall General Plan
Update process. Participants chose which issue groups to attend based on their
personal interests. Each small group was supported by a representative of the City, to
record remarks on large flip charts and a representative ITom MIG, to facilitate the
discussion. The City representatives also helped clarify questions and concerns on
the specifics of the potential strategies.
During the fIrst part of the small group sessions, participants discussed policy
strategies and interpreted the results of the dot exercise. The discussion was focused
on the potential strategies and the reasons why they received or did not receive
support. Participants also proposed new and revised strategies. Participant input
was recorded and is listed later in this report.
This general discussion was then transitioned into a more specific group task:
Participants were asked to generate "One Bold Step," a concrete and straightforward
action that could be implemented as a practical step in the direction agreed upon by
the groups. It could be short or long-term in nature. Because the groups had to
debate and compromise OD the issues, the Bold Steps were not necessarily a full.
group consensus but rather a single, discrete recommendation for action to the City.
The groups were assigned to formulate a Bold Step, write it as a large poster and
nommate a group representative to present it to the Congress as a whole.
The first and second small group sessions were separated by a dinner for all
participants.
At the conclusion of the small group sessions, the entire Congress reassembled and
each of the sixteen small groups sent its representatives to present the Bold Steps.
Representatives were given the floor and microphone and used creativity and humor
to present their groups' ideas to the audience. The Bold Steps were all received with
applause. The night concluded on this note of optimism and a feeling that everyone
had participated actively in discussion, deliberation and imagining an even better
future for Cupertino. A drawing was held and winners were awarded prizes fur their
involvement.
The Congress concluded with final remarks by the City Council on next steps in the
creation of the General Plan Update.
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
CamlnUÐÍt'¡1 Congress, May 3; 2002
Page 3
Report Organization
The remainder of this report summarizes the infonnation generated at the Congress.
In order to preserve the conceptual sequence in which the ideas were voted on and
discussed, the information is presented by issue area. First, a summary chart of the
dot exercise is shown for each issue area. Each chart contains the various potential
strategies as proposed by the City on the large charts. In order to summarize and
easily compare the data, the dot tallies were converted to percentages and the neutral
votes were excluded. Therefore, the numbers appearing in the bar charts represent
the percentages of people who either: 1) Strongly Agree, 2) Agree, 3) Disagree or 4)
Strongly Disagree with each strategy. In analyzing the charts, it is important to take
into account the level of agreement or disagreement and consider why this might
have been the case. The "Post-It Note" comments from the dot boards are listed
directly under the dot exercise tally.
Each small group session began with general discussion on the topic and ultimately
culminated in the formation of the Bold Step statements. The comments that were
recorded on the flip charts appear below for each group, followed by the groups'
respective Bold Steps. The single "Bold Step" is highlighted in yellow. Two of the
written comments did not address any of the subject areas but instead focused on the
organization of the congress. These comments are listed below:
.:. Well organized, but nothing for seniors. I think you want me to move out of Cupertino
so you can get more tax $$ for stupid things.
.:. Make sure people who live, rent, and/or own a business (not employees) to these
meetings only. They actually own and work in person there. (Not people who own
property and live somewhere else) The people who live here are the heart of Cupertino.
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
Community Congress, May 3, 2002
Page 4
"'l1CUPERTINO ;.
-"m""o mobl""'."" w......
m~'~"ot_'m.'""""
C"m"""""'..--I"""'"
-..
..
"
î ~:,":=o:::::-==
i! _m"",,,.
W
~ C_"m'."___"""
C ..""".----
.s ----
0
110.
C_-""",a.-_"",,do
...,.....,,-..--.
_Ide "~m- """"""" ,,-
w"~'m,"""w_o-""'"""
""'...-
Walk-Ability, Bike-Ability & Trails
25%
50%
75%
I. Strongly Agree .Agree IiIDlsagree . Strongly Disagree I
"Sticky-Note" comments from the Walk-Ability, Bike-Ability & Trails Dot Board:
.:- Need to make bicyclists feel safe - so people with get out of their cars.
.:. More pedestrian crosswalks. Should have a pedestrian conttolled stoplight
.:. Do not force owners to sell or donate land & lose their privacy.
.:. y, of a mile is adequate.
0) Need a pedestrian light at Hyde and Bollinger. The Safeway is not realliy IIÍoI:e to go to. because of
the traffic.
.:. Reduce wid1h of "neighborhood arteries"like Columbus Avenue to slow traffic.
.... Speed bumps! Horrid in neighborhoods.
.... Well-designed speed bumps are good. Not big, bumpy ones.
CIty of Cupertino
General Plan Update
Community CÞngtess, Way 3¡ 2Oæ
Page 5
Walk-Ability, Bike-Ability & Trails
0 Add policy to fill in sidewalk gaps - cutback landscaping, lights "flicker".
0 Soften convenience commercial policy
0 Create "true" bike lanes
0 Some neighbors don't want connections to parks
0 Pedlbike as viable as the car
0 Too much development resulting in neighborhood traffic
0 Make safe to cross
0 Need safer crosswalks
0 Need more pedestrian overpasses
0 Residential streets are too wide
0 Narrow streets like SCB
0 People speed in neighborhoods
0 Make Stevens Canyon Road bikeable
0 Narrow travel lanes and reduce speed limits
0 Shorten distance between stops
0 Need better enforcement that favors pedlbikers
0 Pedlr/w city/ped only crosswalks (San Matea)
0 Orange posts@stop intersections
0 Traffic signals @ school hours
0 Traffic speed machines
0 Ped Island @ Sedgwick School
0 More bus routes to encourage walking
0 Need signage for peds
0 SCB more walkable thru design
Group 1
Group 2
0 Have to slow traffic down
0 Do one trail that goes somewhere
0 SCBIDAB is "harrowing"
0 Add no r/t on red
0 Encourage parents to let kids walk to school
0 Need continuous trails
0 Design Rec. trails to they don't attract cars
0 Stevens Canyon Road needs to be fIXed
0 Connect to hills/library etc.
0 LGCT is positive asset to neighbors
BOLD STEPS
0 Access out of "dead-end" neighborhood
0 Utilize creeksIRR
0 Point "A" to "B" demo project
0 Utility & recreation
0 Complete all sidewalks
0 "Walk Cupertino" campaign net walk
0 Speeding enforcement
City of Cupertino
Generai Plan Update
One Bold Step
Connect entire city for walking and
biking. Making pedestrian / cycling as
viable as the automobile.
Demonstrate the viability of this goal
by completing one trail that connects
several major destinations.
One Bold Step
Connect paths to places by
completing ASAP a
demonstration project utilizing
creeks and trails connecting two
focal poillts ill the city.
One trail that works
Walkablelbikeable around schools
Connect entire city (walk & bike)
Pedslbikes as viable as auto
Street festival to close Stevens Creek
Blvd. or De Anza Blvd. each year
0 No right on red at major intersections
0
0
0
0
0
Community Conqress, May 3, 2002
Page 6
"""'CUPERTINO ;.
Neighborhoods
""""""""M"""""'.""-
.. -"""~"-""",.,,,,
CD
'50
S
~
"',-....._.......,,--
¡¡ _.....~_.......""""",.
;:¡
c:
S
0
0..
-"---"""".""
........,"--
".,.... MO,.."""... ,--.." ..
"""",M"",'_"."'.""
M""""""'.
....~-...._-.,_.....
M""""".
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
¡8Stron¡¡Iy Agree GAgæe 1ID1sagree . Strongly Disagree I
"Sticky-Note" comments from the Neighborhoods Dot Board:
.:. Encourage cyberspace connectivity for neighborhoods,
.:. A major grocery store, (Neighborhood)
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
CommlU1i1¥ Congress, Mey 3, 2002
Page 7
Neighborhoods
Group 1
NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTIVITY
0 Improve connections to places
0 Easy physical access to schools, parks, Senior Center, Nimby issues
0 Need sidewalks on Stelling throughout citv. Some areas don't want sidewalks
0 Hard to get on Bubb Road in the morning (school traffic)
0 Hard to get on McClellan Road in the morning (school traffic)
0 Crosswalks for children (Vai & Bubb)
0 Need police at school when it opens
0 Safety for kids (fast cars)
0 Why don't kids walk to school?
0 Only I child per car
0 Does resident parking pennit zone conflict w/ school traffic
0 Kennedy has great connections
0 Railroad conflicts with school traffic?
0 Magnet school a major problem?
0 Increase safety for bicyclists
0 Barrier at Pacifica not needed
0 RR as a bike/ped. Path
0 HWY 85/RR big barriers
0 Orange Avenue major ped. Route - "no sidewalks"
0 McClellan Road near from De Anza - Byrne needs sidewalks
0 Unifonn street planting
0 Different street trees looks bad
0 Aftaid street trees - (lead to) sidewalks
0 Unique neighborhood ideutity
0 Maintenance problems w/ certain trees (roots)
0 Neighbors (disagreement on point) need to choose tree - weigh pros & cons, look at long-tenn
growth
0 Should replacement trees be the same as the rest?
0 Problem with overgrown shrubs
One Bold Step
BOLD STEPS
0 People should replace cars in the community: people>cars
0 Neighbors should derme their neighborhoods
0 Enhance differences between neighborhood identities
0 Different light standards
0 Monuments?
0 Respect neighborhood wishes/neighborhood ulanninl! bv neil!hbors
0 Realign San Jose/Cupertino boundaries to include W. San Jose
0 Can neighborhoods work together? Cooperation
0 RR row as a bike/ped path
Empower neighborhood
decision-making!!
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
Community Congress, May 3, 2002
Page 8
Neighborhoods
Group 2
NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTIVITY
a Connections tø schools
0 Improve kid/pod safety
0 Parents blocking driveways/congestion (streets - parking lots during school time)
0 Faria (option Portal) - Miller
0 Monta Vista
0 Portal
0 Kennedy
0 Have to be in a car - can't walk to anything
0 Need closer proximity to services. Bank, store, dentist, library, etc.
0 Can we reduce traffic?
0 Ped. Signal timing needs to be lonnnngerrrr.. ..
0 Alternative transportation to popular destinations. Shuttle, Jitney, etc., public trans (fee & free)
0 Neighborhood retail centers
0 Within walking distance ~ mile?
0 Seniors cannot walk distances
0 Mixed-use a good use ofland
0 Profitable to build neighborhood retail?
0 Traffic regulations preventing retail development
0 Street tree planting
0 Damage to sidewalks - Liquid Ambers
0 Unifonnity okay, but shouldn't damage improvements
0 Existing street tree program good
0 Choices with range
0 Not a single tree
0 Trees vs. smooth sidewalks
0 Graph dots to gage agreement (strongly agree/agree) vs. disagreement (disagree/strongly
disagree)
0 Neighborhood identity
0 Identity strong already - don't need to spend money
0 Concern it would divide City
One Bold Slop
BOLD STEPS
0 Leave us alone
0 Steady as she goes
0 Address school traffic issue - chitdren's safety
0 Monster homes need to be controlled
0 City needs t<> be pre-active in enforcement
0 Eneourae:e aeie:hborIv eommunieation & ooooeration
0 Beautify, increase safety, œdw:e vehicle traffic offer attractive transportation alternatives
0 Pubücize NeighOOrDood W aleh &; Emergency Prepøndness in Cupertiøo Scene
EIU:ØIIrøgt! ~
CII_"-"" œuI
cooJ1ÐVliø-JI
City of Cupørtino
General Plan Update
CømmuniI:t c;.",g,ess, May 3, 2002
Page 9
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
This page was intentionally left blank
Community Congress, May 3,2002
Page 10
CUPERTINO Ð-
c_.--.-,......--....
'M ,_.............. ~--
".........---."""..,..
O_"'-""~-""""'"
"""."'" ~_...... _.
~................-.....
III
"
c;,
s
..
.:. -""................_-
VI """""""".0_""_""',
¡¡ .................
..
"
s
~ -.--...--.-
-'.___."08'"
...........--..
-"".......-......
.--..--......
--
Circulation
0'lIo
25%
50%
75%
100%
18StronglyAgree rlAgree ClDlsagree 8 Strongly Disagree I
"Sticky -Note" comments from the Circulation Dot Board:
.:. Bury highest density through traffic underground,
.:. Where is the survey that people will walk? They don't now.
.:. Challenge the premise that "Downtown Village" should be a the Crossroads.
w) Would liIœ to see It lot of pedesll'ian ovapasses.
.) Each neighborhood problem is unique and should be dealt with It special solution.
.) Reduce width of "neighborhood arteries" like Columbus Avenue to slow traffic.
Citv of Cupertino
General Plan Update
CommUl4i/y Congress, May 3, 2002
Page 11
Circulation
Group 1
NEIGHBORHOODS LEVEL OF TRAFFIC
a Need to look at neighborhood traffic with cut thru traffic
a School traffic to get there from other areas
a Safetv because of iIleeal uarkine other alt. to drivine in children
a Too much traffic around schools. How is it measured to come wi solution
a Diversion lanes w/island. Drop off for school off road
a Traffic situation should be reported
One Bold Step
REDUCE #OF LANES ON 4 LANES
. Bollinger Road & Homestead Rd
0 Balance road use to be equal for pedlbike & veh.
a Take an 8 lane to 6 lane does make cozy street
a Con - neighborhood traffic increase
a Public transportation form other cities need to improve. Cut through community. Needs to stop at
nodes to shop or dine
a Depress De Anza under SCB - commute traffic
a How many ped. will use the area? Things are spread out too far. Not feasible to walk.
a Growth - need to look at how to mix use and keep balance keep level of service but be ped
friendly
a De Anza College- more parking on street would cause huge traffic issues of movement
a Re-visit the public transportation viability
a Higher density will put more stress on environment and create more congestion. Don't allow
higher density
a No land to build on
a Flow model- need to look at breaking it into pass through traffic and neighborhood traffic
a Increase of students at De Anza will effect traffic
a Slow growth will push people out of the area and require people to commute farther.
a Time is valuable people may not want to stop in Cup to shop or dine
a Work with other cities to handle the traffic issues
a How long will we add lanes to handle additional traffic
a Cut through traffic still a problem/not using HWY 85
a NO DOWNTOWN - Cannot walk comfortably because of traffic. No meeting destinations. What
will it take to improve this round-about at De Anza &SCB
a Intra-City vs, Inter-City traffic values
Addressing intra-city vs.
inter-city circulation!
City of Cupertino
Generai Plan Update
Community Congress, May 3, 2002
Page 12
Circulation
Group 2
LANE REDUCTION
0 If reducing lanes then we need to gain from it. Larger parkway slow travel lanes for businesses
0 SCB is more the inter street
0 De Anza is only access to HWY 280 & HWY 85 - reduction will be restrictive to access hwy
0 Cannot do just one thing without a ripple effect
0 City Center or Down Town needs to be started now
0 De Anza moves traffic to other cities
0 Street too unfiiendly to want to walk - not enough going on even if streets are reduced
0 Why do we want to change?
0 Need to create an enw to keep people in City and attract them
0 Multi-phase develop and restrict traffic
0 Shuttles to helD move DOODle from Vallco to Oaks. ete... need to route around to residential
areas - FREE SOLAR
0 To reduce lanes very costly, what if you did the reduction and no one came? We have looked at
before.
LIGHT RAIL SYSTEM
Down SCB - General Plan
0 Cheap means of transportation they work
0 Busses - free - at least one line
TIME FOR PED. CROSSING
0 Change times to help ped. get across as needed if possible
0 May cause kmger wait but may get people out of car
0 Install coumùowD timer to teD pet! remaÎIÙI1g time to cross
0 Mary @ SCB changes that were made were not ped friendly but to benefit cars
0 City does not seem serious about ped friendly
0 We have removed some destinations ie: SCB @ Blaney
0 Need to have the places to go to make us want to walk
0 Avg. person will not walk 2miles one way
0 Forcing the choking of traffic to get pedwill force into neighborhood
0 Depress SCB
0 Ped oven:rossing De Anza & SCB
0 School traf'lñ: - need a strategy to handle this problem, encourage bike use
0 School busses - where did they go?
0 Children should walk - Safety
0 Busses to expensive and parents will not pay
0 District parking - centralize then bus
0 Need to re-survey parent about bussing
0 Bus potlution increases with more busses
0 Pollution doc 10 traffic sitting longer at signals
0 School zones - people will travel longer dîstan£es to get around the congestion
0 Look at City as a "blank slate" for when "Big One" happens that we can rebuild the city the way
we want if planned in advance
0 Our roads are for Cupertino and not for travel thru. Den't focus on getting people thru town.
One Bold Step
Focus Oft [n"tH:ity cin:1II«iDn
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
Canmunily CMgmsa, Mal< 3, 2002
Page 13
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
This page was intentionally left blank
Community Congress, May 3, 2002
Page 14
""!CUPERTINO m. Environmental Resources & Sustainability
'-"".""""'-
"""""""""'-"--"'"
~~"""""'>
..
.!! ,-,..-..........."",.....
Ii' ........_.....,~.
1!
Iii
]I
ë -..-..--..
~ ~"""'--"-
... ....-
R._.._.._-
-"""-""-"-~
on_--'"
0%
25%
5C%
75%
100%
¡.Strongly Agree IIAgree .Dlsagree . Strongly Disagree I
"Sticky-Note" comments from the Environmental Resonrces/ Sustain ability Dot Board:
':0 Address pesticide use, especially in parks.
':0 Should encourage conservation. Should encourage efficient night lighting that doesn't light up the
sky.
.:. "All" is a bad word. You can consume more resources in recycling than you save.
':0 Never say "all".
.) Should maIœ it easier to l'CtWn deposit bottles and. caDS.
.:. An agency to report water wasters after there is enormC>U8 wasted water in streets.
CIty or Cuper//no
General Plan Update
Community IÀl1!1F9ss. Way 3; 2œ2
Rlge 15
Environmental Resources I Sustainability
Group 1
GREEN BillLDING
0 Loss of energy
0 Greenhouse effect
0 Cost of energy
0 Healthier to work in
0 Cost is down in the long run
0 Enhance public info on G.B./seminars
0 Energy efficiency
0 Pesticides
0 Buildings
SOLAR
0 Sell back energy - revenue
0 Rebates in bills
0 Encourage hybrid vehicles
0 Clean air
0 Enhance pub. Info on solar
0 Decrease construction costs in
the long run, utility/construction
One Bold Step
SOLID W ASTEIRECYCLING BillLDING MATERIAL
0 Large scale food waste collection for composting
0 Puttin!! solar on new library
0 Cover the whole penn. W/ geodesic dome
0 Recycling/reuse of historically significant building materials
0 Pennit fee rebates for recycling of demo waste like San Jose
Put solar panels Oil the
IIew library!!
Alld Passive Solar
ADDRESS PESTICIDE USE
0 Public education on this
0 Reduce pesticide use on public places/parks/landscaping/horticulture w/ respect to allergents
Group 2
GREEN BillLDING
0 Less pollution
0 Natural resources benefits
0 Water conservation
0 Less smoglbetter indoor/outdoor air
quality
0 Create a creek restoration program
in the City esp. SCB
0 Recycle old compo Parts
SOLAR
0 Cost savings
0 Natural resources conservation
0 Always there
One Bold Step
BOLD STEPS
0 Create a public Info/education pro!!ram
0 Partnership with De Anza
0 All new public buildln!!s (new librarv) shall install env. Best prac.
0 Public/private incentives for utilizing env. Best practices
New librarv as show case for !!reen buildin!! desl!!n & renewable ener!!v tech.
Make all city buildings
showcases/or "Greell
Building" design!!
Startillg with library
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
Community Congress, May 3, 2002
Page 16
""CUPERTINO ;.
Development Nodes
V""., .""".,....
..,.."Iom..",... .....
"..,.. .ot.,.., .."...
.",."....,..."",
...nt__VII"." ......,
! m::::::: :'::.:~ ~~~:~:~.
.. "...".~ ..,..""hI. ')00"'.
1! ".u.. II....
u;
:¡¡
c:
~
...
Clt, c...." ".uld. ,.....,
.""".""""""".,.,
",....C"..... A.".
..-,.,.....-.-.
«,_,.". CI... C..,..
...... LI...,.., .".,.,
",..."...."..".
."..'K,,"'. .tIt" ""m.t
.......,.....
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
I- SIrDngfy Agree m Agree QClilagree - Strangty Disagree I
"Sticky-Note" comments from the Development Nodes Dot Board:
.> Something ~ be done. The City loses sales tax revenues. Vallca is easier to access than Hwy
280, so it really should be more desirable.
.:. What is the height on all buildings? (Downtown Village)
.:. (Downtown Viltage) Yes, but not necessarily at the Crossroads. (De Anza Boulevard & Stevens
Creek Boulevard)
0) Needs to be a I't8! walking enviftmment. Not jus¡ mOl'lt buiIdmgs cl0ser to the street. SiœwaIks
big enough far outside cafes and res1aurant seating.
0) Merrtion was made of entertainment at Vallco. One concern I have is the eost. However, I have
an idea - make the entertainment he relatively cheap to produce and be mrique. Make it a conredy
club and/or improv. club.
City of Cupertino
General Plan Updale
Community ~ May 3, 2002
Page 17
Development Nodes
Group 1
Walkable Stevens Creek corridor connecting new & old centers
0 Identifiable 0 Transit friendly
0 Sense of place 0 New buildinglbus.
0 Pedestrian Friendly 0 Street Enclosure
0
VALLCO
0 Is this practical since it is privately owned
0 Strong vision to influence Vallco
0 Residential may not fit - traffic & services
¡:¡ Restaurants/movies will add life
0 Residential will add life
0 Tax incentives to convert dream to reality
0 Totally different/unique to compete with
Valley Fair
0 Include HP/Compaq in dev. Plan
0 Concentrate our "center" in Valleo -
pedestrian place
0 Concerned about entertainment
0 Has not succeeded in other areas
(SJlPalo Alto)
0 May be something like Westgate
0 More restaurants/food court IApplebee's
etc. $$ here!
0 Redo existing & turn inside out (Galleria,
LA)
0 Include teens
0 Skateboard park
0 Theater in Rose Bowl
CITY CENTER - Park
0 Can't be achieved because too much
development already
0 New developments should maintain the
quality so people keep coming
0 Should have uses that 'fmish the puzzle'
DOWNTOWN VILLAGE
0 Love town center idea
0 Perfect location - center
0 Have existing retail- build on
¡:¡ Keep traffic through
0 Not as big as Valleo - better place
0
0 Would like a place PAlLG to "hang ouf'.
0 Expensive to change building formats
0 Divert traffic around & make it pedlbike
friendly
0 Stevens Creek can't be diverted
One Bold Step
Make Oaks Shopping Center the
center of a pedestrian-oriented
Cupertino
Bring back a bookstore
NODES & LINKAGES
0 Light rail on SCB - median
connecting to SJ/Caitrain
0 Shared parking bet. uses. Keep
parking free corporate lots
0
BOLD STEPS
0 Tear down Valleo & start fresh
0 Light rail
0 Connect our centers for residents, bikes & peds. (SCB - De Anza/Oaks, Target, Valleo)
0 Create a sense of unique place (beautiful, walkable, restaurants, benches, more trees)
0 Markers on Ped. Paths - miles walked and calories burned
0 Places - destination (microbrewery)
0 Residential wi mixed use
0 Connect continuous businesses
0 New businesses - bookstores
0 Have something to look at
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
Community Congress, May 3,2002
Page 18
Development Nodes
VALLCO
0 Better department stores as anchors to compete
0 Look at city's needs when redeveloping Vallco
0 Make Cupertino a destination to spend $$ - conf/restaurants
0 Place to "hang out"/walk
0 Currently "user-hostile" change
0 Develop more residential since location is not conducive to downtown
0 Revitalize w/ entertainment & compete with Valley Fair. Build on current
0 Family-fiiendly
0 Use current infrastructure
0 Redevelopment areas gives city more influence - use it
0 Use city resources aggressive to create a place it wants
0 Opportunity to provide affordable housing - dense 5-6 stories
0 Of access to fteeways
0 Tear down - put IKEA
0 Consider lIP/Compaq when redeveloping Vallco
DOWNTOWN VILLAGE
0 Encourage ex. & new businesseslbookstoreslshoemaker
0 Don't take lanes or bring buildings close - create traffic prob.
0 SCB - not the place
0 Don't concentrate on Vallco - create centers that are connected
0 Oaks is a good location - downtown
0 Already thought of - rejected. Don't try again - will create hodge podge
0 Need model of any area that would fit
0 Need to expand SCB
0 Need 2-3 stories - don't over build
0 Strolling bridges to walk above streets
0 Could create "bad development"
0 Already have "Cupertino Village" - enhance
CITY CENTER - Park
0 Open space w/ happy sculpture
0 Apricot/cherry trees - orcbard idea
0 Too much traffic for usable pari<
TOWN CENfER
0 Notice entire city for meetings
LINKAGES
0 No connections - too much traffic
0 Need too much critical mass to be successful- not Cupertino
0 Oaks - Great location - MGM PKT, sports centerlDe Anza
0 Town Cem=Civic Center bI:tIer locatUm
0 Use money (10 reduce lanes) & get bookstore instead
0 Provide enjoyable ped/bike routes
0 Walk anywhere safely/seamlessly
0 Distinguish type of work neighborhoods & connect trails
0 Trails to hillsides, consider horselbikes etc.
Group 2
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
One Bold Step
W8IkabIe!! Stneu 0Yd Bolllewutt-
~ -- I11III oU City «IIIns
.I~
. s-. of pIJIø
.~~
. »øair (Ii :Irt rwiI) frkll4ly
. New ............
. BIIiIt III .. - md.
Community Catlgres.s, MIq. 3; 2002
Page 19
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
This page was intentionally left blank
Community Congress, May 3, 2002
Page 20
üry'JCUPERTINO &
"~-'--".'.~"'~""""".'
-"~,,_.
g¡ "'::::::'::;::;:;::::::.:'::"
'6>
s
..
.::.
UI ,--_~.._",d""'",_,_"
õi ....
'"
c
~
A. ~~-"__"'~m"',
-
"..I~"'_-'""-
-.""'._...'d"""..__'"
._..............,-,....."
-"""".
Commercial & Office Development
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
18SII'Ðf1gIyAgret! mAgr- DDisagree 8S11:ongly Disagree I
"Sticky-Note" comments from the Commercial & Office Development Dot Board:
.:. Consider coanecting existing commercial to mŒed-use or high density =idential with preference
for affordabte housing with teocherlpo\:i<:eltire deparnnent priority.
.:. Whatever you do, make sure there is enough parking - perhaps underground.
.:. De-annex land. Give land north of280 to Sunnyvale, Santa Clara, San Jose or county.
.:. Specific # of housing?? Need individual evaluation.
.:. How high will buildings be?
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
Comrmmi/y Coo¡:¡",ss, May 3. 2002
Page 21
Commercial & Office Development
Group 1
RETAIN, DO NOT EXPAND NEIGH. COM
0 What is a small neighborhood?
0 Keep small businesses
0 Mixed-use - retail & residential
0 Strike a good balance
0 Potentially have employees live above
0 Want to expand retail- consider mixed
for vacant land
REDUCE DEV. POTENTIAL
0 Maintain or slightly increased - NOT reduce
0 Imnrove existing dev, take of what we have
0 Balance - don't be a bedroom comm.
0 Hotel w/ conf. Centers boost small restaurants
BOLD STEPS
0 Balanced growth (Commercial,
office, residential)
0 Vallco park - live up to potentiat
(make it a park)
Homes then offices
Create destination
Density needed to get critical mass
0
0
0
Group 2
RETAIN DO NOT EXPAND NEIGH. COM
0 Support mixed use
0 Ties community to existing areas
0 Tough to get loans (home purchase).
Rental units, not ownership
DEV. ON MAJOR ROADS
0 Market takes care of it
0 Focus on Stevens Creek
0 Focus on Vallco area
0 Reduce dev potential
0 RDA makes $ - focus there
0 Office tied to housing
0 Bad to mix too much res w/ non-res.
0 Convert office to res.
0 Don't lock into JIH ratio
0 In-lieu fees instead of new units
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
KEEP DEV. ON MAJOR ROADS
0 Could attract light rail
0 Keep out of neighborhood
0 Light rail- employment, not stopping
One Bold Step
Create a destination in partnership
with aU stake holders while
maximizing the potential of current
resources-balanced growth
0 Build housing over retail- vertical
mixed
0 Make unique shops - something they
can't get elsewhere - identity
0 Max Dotential of current comm. prop.
0 Partnership - City & Business
0 Public & Private PartnershiD
One Bold Step
Building Community
Promote Incentives for Mixed Use
in Commercial Development
BOLD STEPS
0 Build diverse community
0 Commercial services near jobs
0 Mixed use
0 $ incentive - private/public win win
situation
Flexibility
Build community
Promote inc. for mixed use in com
0
0
0
Community Congress, May 3, 2002
Page 22
"'l,rCUPERTINO .~
""..""~..,&'"W~'."'..,..........
"~,m'J~M",'OO"""'"
'".~.._"'~"'moo.""""
-"'"'~"'~"""""""'O."
:¡ ..-.
C.
J!!
[!
ûí "o..."~"....................,,"
:! """"o_,"""""w'oo"""""""
ë
S
0
II. -...........-._w.-
"""".""""'-"-."'-'"
....-
"-"""""'w'"-"""""~'"
f~__mo""(""'I_o.
Housing
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
¡8Strongly Agree ClAgræ ElDisagree 8 Strongly Disagree I
Additional comments from the Housing Dot Board:
.:. Affordable housing should be located in wa!kable, high-density areas.
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
Community Congtess. May 3, 2002
Page 23
Housing
IJ Problem is low wages
IJ Balance jobs & housing
IJ Balance of schools, housing & parks
IJ Residents can't afford to buy home today
IJ Trade-offb/t housing & good quality oflife
IJ More housing ruins quality oflife
IJ Public service employee can live elsewhere
IJ Limit growth
IJ Public service employees are valuable
IJ Scatter affordable units
IJ Provide variety of housing choices
IJ Job turnover with PIS employees
0 Can't afford homes
IJ Buy large homes & convert to 4-plexes, etc.
IJ SCB/De Anza - integ. Mixed-use dev. WI transit & aff. Hsg. With consideration to environ. &
quality of life & needed infrastructure
Group 1
IJ Mixed use tied to Downtown Village
IJ Design is not important
0 Not too high
Traffic may increase
Quality of life- environmental concerns
Smaller units more affordable
Schools impacted by more units
Teachers need housing in community
Some housing for public service
employees
CJ Cluster new housing together
0 Does not increase density in
neighborhoods
IJ Short-tenn Vallco wi low & very-low
housing wi entertainment center
IJ More zoning code enforcement
0 More proactive
IJ Afraid oflooking too much like LA,
Santa Monica
IJ Long-tenn: Hanson/Kaiser site for
housing wi variety ofhousing
choices
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
IJ
CJ
Group 2
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
IJ Developers have fewer rules
IJ Second units may impact
neighborhoods negatively
IJ Traffic and parking
IJ Redevelop Vallco as mixed-use wi res.
IJ Add units to HansonlKaiser site
IJ Variety of housing choices needed
IJ Co-housing
One Bold Step
Stevens Creek Boulevard I De Anza
Area:
Integrate mixed-use development with
transit and affiliated housing with
consideration given to environment,
quality of life and infrastructure.
One Bold Step
Short-term: Develop Vallco with mixed-use
including low and very low income housing
with entertainmentlmis. centers.
Long-term: Utilize the future Hanson! Kaiser
site to satisjý greater housing needs with
variety of housing choices.
Community Congress, May 3, 2002
Page 24
"l'!CUPERTINO ~
,"'.N.".~_~""'""-'.
,.~,",<",,-,
..-................,'"'-""".
<-"""".",......-...-
--,...-...........,
II)
CD
C.
$ --""""""""""""'N"'-'
i! ......,.",.........
iií
:! --._--
ë --...............-
~ -
a.
.---..-.-
-~_..........
......,.....--.......-..
"""_____f"""'",-
.....
Open Space & Parks
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
¡8Slrongly Agree eAgree DDlsagree 8S1rongly Disagree I
Additional comments from the Open Space and Parks Dot Board:
.:- Small parks can be used for specific population services. Example: Teen Center. This may
address the maintenance issue.
+:- Coosult with teachers in piau. Let schools use the property during sdloot hours and after fur
school activities.
Citv of Cupertino
General Plan Update
COmmllllitV C'ooQreæ. May 3, 2002
Page 25
Open Space and Parks
Everybody loves parks
a People walk in parks
a People use the parks
Meeting place
"Stage"
Memorial Park & other parks successful
Require develop. to provide
a Integrate open space into new developments
a Increase density to preserve open space
Buy open space wlo density
Preserve natural areas
a Wildlife corridors
a Rec. trails in city
a Wildlife in regional parks
a Keep McClellan as a preserve
Re-think exist. Parks to be more natural
a Native landscaping
a Environmental ed.
Joint Venture wi schools
a Teach stewardship at schools
a Teach leadership wi park stewardships
a Consult with teachers on planning
Connect green space
a Stevens Creek Trail
a Saratoga Creek
a Street trees
Group 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
One Bold Step
Go Native!
(Park landscape, wildlife. habitat,
environmental education)
Community Congress, May 3, 2002
Page 26
Open Space and Parks
Group 2
i:I People support parks
0 They move here for: open space, schools, climate
0 Peace of mind
0 Parks for all age groups (Everyhody)
i:I Require open space ftom developers or enough money
0 Most effective contribution
0 Add space at Biltmore
IJ Add space - more dispersed green space
IJ Parks for SR & young kids
0 Teens community need - neighborhood problem
i:I Teahouse in parks
0 Sister city garden
0 Library
i:I Multigenerational parks
0 Gym instead of Teen Center
0 Gym provides physical exercise & social interaction
i:I Joint Venture wi schools
0 Community use off-hours
IJ Trails
0 Stevens Creek trail
IJ Needmore land- not enough left
IJ Shuttle bus to parks on the hour
0 Extend bus service to parks lopen space
IJ Walking routes
0 Map
0 Cross town trail
0 Streets more friendly
IJ Connections
0 BBF to McClellan
0 Stevens Creek Trail
0 Public transit connections
0 Cross town trail to public transit
i:I Community garden
0 Let people garden areas that are currently vacant
0 Add gardens to high density areas
0 Bamboo garden (classic Chinese garden)
Joint venturelDe Anza to create a beautiful park on campus
More trees
Parks in park def. Area
Park concessions
0 In many parks
0 Bocce bailihorseshoes
0 Games like checkers
i:I Create the feeling of community in parks
i:I Welcome to Cupertino
One Bold Step
Create community through parks
Concessions!
Gardens!
Gathering!
IJ
i:I
IJ
i:I
City of Cupertino
General Plan Update
Community Congress, May 3, 2002
Page 27
CUPEIQ1NO
DRAFT MINUTES
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
Tuesday, February 17, 2004
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
At 6:48 p.m. Mayor James called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torre
Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
City Council members present: Mayor Sandra James, Vice-Mayor Patrick Kwok, and Council
members Dolly Sandoval and Kris Wang. Council members absent: Richard Lowenthal.
Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood, City
Attorney Charles Kilian, Public Works Director Ralph Qualls, Community Development
Director Steve Piasecki, Senior Planner Colin lung, Parks and Recreation Director Therese
Smith, Public Information Officer Rick Kitson, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith.
Mayor James reordered the agenda to conduct the Closed Session and Item No. 11 next.
CLOSED SESSION
10.1
Labor negotiations - Government Code Section 54957.6. The purpose of the closed
session is to consult with representatives Dick Whitmore, David Knapp, Carol Atwood,
Ralph Qualls, and Sandy Abe concerning labor negotiations with Operating Engineer's
Local No.3.
At 6:49 p.m. Council recessed to a closed session. At 7:06 p.m. Council reconvened in
the Council Chambers. The City Attorney announced that the Council had met with its
representatives and agreed to approve the agreement with the operating engineers, but
noted that this agreement does not resolve the issue of the complaint filed by the union
with the Public Employees Relations Board (PERB) regarding alleged unfair labor
practices. He said that the Council decided to authorize the settlement even though the
union is still attempting to prosecute that complaint. He said the City now has an
agreement with the union for this last year.
{-I
February 17,2004
Cupertino City Council
Page 2
NEW BUSINESS
11.
Adopt resolutions approving fiscal year 2003/04 terms and conditions of employment for
the bargaining unit represented by Operating Engineers, Local Union 3 (OE3), and
approving extended benefits for the City Employees' Association and unrepresented
employees, Resolution Nos. 04-269, 04-271, 04-272, and 04-273.
Kwok/Sandoval moved and seconded to adopt the following resolutions: Vote: Ayes:
James, Kwok, Sandoval, and Wang. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal.
. Resolution 04-269, adopting an MOU between the City of Cupertino and
Operating Engineers Local No.3 (OE3)
. Resolution No. 04-271, related to California Public Retirees Retirement System
Social Security benefits;
. Resolution No. 04-272, amending an MOU between the City of Cupertino and the
City Employees' Association (CEA)
. Resolution No. 04-273, amending resolution No. 00-185, Unrepresented
Employees compensation program.
CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS - None
POSTPONEMENTS - None
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Kendra McIntyre, resident of S. Stelling Road, spoke about the traffic problems created by the
DeAnza College construction of a parking garage. She said that in December Dr. Jim Arnold
offered a proposal regarding traffic, signage, and additional landscaping, but has not yet received
a response. She said that DeAnza College is also working toward solving the traffic problem but
so far has not been helpful, and she asked if the City would take the lead. She also asked that the
residents be part of the monthly college meeting, or that a City representative take part in those
meetings.
Mayor James asked that staff report back on the feasibility of adding larger plants in the Stelling
median, and whether the college would provide financial support. Sandoval suggested a staff
member attend the monthly meetings to express the City's viewpoint and to learn first-hand what
information the college has.
{-2
February 17,2004
Cupertino City Council
Page 3
CONSENT CALENDAR
Sandoval/Kwok moved and seconded to approve the items on the Consent Calendar as
recommended, with the exception ofItem 4, which was pulled for discussion. Vote: Ayes: James,
Kwok, Sandoval, and Wang. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal.
1.
Approve the minutes from the January 20, February 2, and 3 City Council meetings.
2.
Adopt resolutions accepting Accounts Payable for January 30 and February 6, Resolution
Nos. 04-261 and 04-262.
3.
Adopt resolutions accepting Payroll for January 30 and February 13, Resolution Nos. 04-
263 and 04-264.
5.
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Cooperative Agreement
with the Cupertino Union School District (CUSD) to provide for a temporary school
pedestrian crossing guard at Collins School during construction related to the conversion
of Collins School from an elementary to a middle school, and authorizing the City to
receive funds from the CUSD for the crossing guard, Resolution No. 04-266.
6.
Accept municipal improvements (may include grading, street improvements, on site and
off-site improvements). No documentation in packet:
a)
William Hurt, 21860 Alcazar Avenue, APN 357-14-036
b)
Richard Joseph and Grace Perez, 10485 Byrne Avenue, APN 357-12-040
c)
Steven and Laura Patterson, 10106 Crescent Court, APN 326-17-029
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above)
4.
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Local Agency - State
Agreement with the California Department of Transportation to receive Bicycle
Transportation Account (BTA) grant funds for the Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge
Project in the amount of $600,000.00, Resolution No. 04-265.
Public Works Director Ralph Qualls said that this action would fully fund the project.
Sandoval/Wang moved and seconded to adopt Resolution No. 04-265. Vote: Ayes:
James, Kwok, ,Sandoval, and Wang. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal.
(- 3
February 17,2004
Cupertino City Council
Page 4
PUBLIC HEARINGS
7.
Consider request to reconsider Application Nos. Z-2003-03, TM-2003-03, U-2003-05,
EXC-2003-04, EA-2003-ll, Ken Busch! Regis Homes, 21255 Stevens Creek Boulevard,
APN(s): 326-27-035 (Oaks Shopping Center). (Applicant requests that this item be
continued).
Community Development Director Steve Piasecki said that because one of the City
Council members was not present at this meeting, the applicant requests continuance to
March I. Mayor James said she would abstain because of a perceived conflict of interest.
Ken Busch, representing the applicant, said they felt it would be most fair if the full
Council were present to consider the request.
E. J. Conens, a Cupertino resident, said he did not think a continuance should be allowed,
and the applicant should submit a new plan if there is additional infonnation or new
designs.
City Attorney explained that Council should first decide whether to allow the
continuance; if not then the Council should next decide whether to reconsider the item.
Discussion followed regarding the request for continuance, with Kwok and Wang
expressing their opposition.
Kwok/Sandoval moved and seconded to continue the item to March 1. Vote: Ayes:
Kwok, Sandoval. Noes: Wang. Absent: Lowenthal. Abstaining: James.
Kwok said that he voted in favor of the continuance because he wanted to make sure that
nothing was overlooked in the original hearing, but he did not wish to see any new plans
as part of the reconsideration.
PLANNING APPLICATIONS - None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
8.
Adopt a resolution adopting a Donor Recognition Artifacts Policy and Procedure,
Resolution No. 04-270.
Sandoval/James moved and seconded to adopt Resolution No. 04-270 with the following
amendments: Paragraph I, Policy Guidelines shall read "Locating donor recognition
artifacts on city property is limited to the authorized foundations of public school districts
only (Foothill-DeAnza Community College District, Cupertino Union school district, and
Fremont Union High School District)." Paragraph 4, Procedure, shall read "The city will
make reasonable efforts to preserve any donor artifacts on city property." Vote: Ayes:
James, Kwok, Sandoval, and Wang. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal
(-L.(
February 17,2004
Cupertino City Council
Page 5
NEW BUSINESS (continued)
9.
Reorganization proceedings for territory designated as Monta Vista 02-07. (Continued
from 2/2/04):
a)
Verify the number of protests
b)
Adopt a resolution making determinations and approving the reorganization for
territory designated as Monta Vista 02-07, consisting of approximately 43.41
acres of developed and undeveloped, unincorporated property generally bounded
by Stevens Creek Boulevard, Union Pacific Railroad tracks, McClellan Road and
Blackberry Farm, commonly known as Monta Vista, and the detachment of the
same territory that is within the Santa Clara County Lighting Service Area,
Resolution No. 04-267
Senior Planner Colin Jung reviewed the staff report and listed the findings that are
included as a part of the resolution.
The City Clerk distributed a written complaint from Susan Sievert claiming that
the City had violated state and public hearing notice law. The complaint asked
that the staff recommendation be invalidated and the proceedings terminated.
The City Clerk reported that protestors to the reorganization did not reach the
necessary protest thresholds for registered voters or property owners to require an
election on the issue.
She said that a total of 108 valid protests were received. This constituted 23.2%
of the 314 registered voters residing in the affected territory, and a minimum of
25% was required for an election. Also, 30.5% of the 298 property owners who
own 20% of the total assessed land valuation had submitted protests, but a
minimum of 25% of the landowners who own at least 25% of the assessed land
valuation was required for an election.
Kwok/Wang moved and seconded to adopt a Negative Declaration. Vote: Ayes:
James, Kwok, Sandoval, and Wang. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal.
Kwok/Wang moved and seconded to adopt Resolution No. 04-267 making
determinations and approving the reorganization. Vote: Ayes: James, Kwok,
Sandoval, and Wang. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal
10.
Cupertino Civic Centers and Library Project:
(a)
Recommend the allocation of up to $350,000.00 in end of project contingency
funds for upgrades and add-backs to the project scope of the Library/Civic Center
Project
(-5'
Cupertino City Council
Page 6
February 17,2004
(b)
(c)
(d)
Report on Library Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (FF&E) funding and
allocation of funds in the amount of $439,248.00 for the Book Stack Shelving
Contract and in the amount of $150,000.00 for Amendment No.4 to the SMWM
Design Agreement for a total allocation of funds $589,248.00
Consider bid protest, review bids, waive minor irregularities in the bid documents,
and award the Civic Center & Library Project-Book Stack Shelving Contract,
Project No. 2003-05 to The Ross McDonald Company, Inc., the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder, with the base bid amount of $418,440.00 plus
Alternate No.1 in the amount of $20,808.00 for a total of $439,248.00; and to
incorporate the responses in the staff report of February 14 as findings.
Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute
Amendment No.4 to the Design Agreement with SMWM Architects for Library
FF&E design services in the amount of $125,000.00, and authorizing the Director
of Public Works to approve up to $25,000.00 of additional services for a total
authorization of$150,000.00, Resolution No. 04-268
Public Works Director Ralph Qualls reviewed the staffreport. Administrative Services
Director Carol Atwood distributed a chart listing the total donations received to date of
$354,450. Qualls explained that a portion of that was donated for public art, so the
remaining $342,200 was available for furnishings and fixtures. He recommended that the
City Council pay the $270,000 balance required out of the Solid Waste Fund, which
would be paid back in two fiscal years, 2005 and 2006, with some funds that would have
been the extra hours at the library.
Nicol Lea, Coordinator of the Cupertino Library Foundation, said the foundation recently
had been given $25,000 from Menlo Equities, $1,000 from Chester Wang, and $12,500
from Prometheus, and they are still working on other sponsorships. She said they have
fundraisers planned and feel comfortable they can raise the $1.2 million. She asked that
they not be requested to raise any money for the cost of donor plaques, design consultant
fees or services, etc. Ralph Qualls said that the architectural fees of $3.6 million
constitutes 15% of the project, which is not unusual, and it has been added in increments
as things have changed, such as the addition of an aquarium. He said that as the
donations are received by the city, the debt to the Solid Waste Fund would be reduced, so
there may be no need to reduce library hours depending upon the amount of donations
received.
Barbara Rogers, Cupertino Library Foundation, said that anyone interested in making a
donation could contact her at 408-252-8568, or send checks payable to the Cupertino
Library Foundation to 19764 Auburn Drive, Cupertino, CA 95014.
(-to
Cupertino City Council
Page 7
February 17,2004
12.
13.
Sandoval/Kwok made the following motion. Vote: Ayes: James, Kwok, Sandoval, and
Wang. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal.
1.
Approve the allocation of $250,000 from the end-of-project contingency for the
three additional add-backs to the project, leaving an uncommitted balance of
$475,000 in the end-of-project contingency.
2.
Approve the allocation of $589,248 from sources to be detennined from the
proceeds of the Library FF&E Fundraising Campaign and/or, if necessary,
advanced from the Solid Waste Fund.
3.
Consider the bid protest, review bids, waive minor irregularities in the bid
documents, and award the Civic Center & Library Project-Book Stack Shelving
Contract, Project No. 2003-05 to The Ross McDonald Company, Inc., the lowest
responsive, responsible bidder, with the base bid amount of $418,440.00 plus
Alternate No. I in the amount of $20,808.00 for a total of $439,248.00; and to
incorporate responses in the staffreport of February 14 as findings.
4.
Adopt resolution No. 04-268 authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and
execute Amendment No.4 to the Design Agreement with SMWM Architects for
Library FF&E design services in the amount of $125,000.00, and authorizing the
Director of Public Works to approve up to $25,000.00 of additional services for a
total authorization of $150,000.00.
Deny request for fee waivers from three organizations in the amount of $225.00 each to
hang banners across Stevens Creek Boulevard.
KwoklWang moved and seconded to deny the request for fee waivers. Vote: Ayes:
James, Kwok, Sandoval, and Wang. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal.
Accept a donation from the Langlois Unitrust in the amount of $17,153.25 for use at the
Cupertino Senior Center.
Parks and Recreation Director Therese Smith explained that the Senior Center plans to
use the funds to purchase an espresso cart, and then the volunteers will run a coffee
center.
SandovallKwok moved and seconded to accept the donation, and to invite the Langlois
family to a "grand opening" of the coffee center made possible by their donation. Vote:
Ayes: James, Kwok, Sandoval, and Wang. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal.
ORDINANCES - None
1-7
February 17,2004
Cupertino City Council
Page 8
STAFF REPORTS
14.
Receive status report on General Fund Revenue and Expenditures. (No documentation in
packet).
Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood reported on revenues and expenditures
through Jan 31. She said that revenues were $900,000 below prior year levels, on a cash
flow basis and that expenditures are down $400,000 over last year. She said that both of
those figures are consistent with the November report, and noted that the revenue mix has
changed. She said the holiday sales helped the sales tax figures that are $300,000 year to
date instead of the prior $ 125,000. Atwood said the rate ofretum on City investments is
at an all-time low. She reported that the Economic Uncertainty reserves total $8.5
million, and the Capital Projects reserve has $500,000, which was money saved by
switching to San Jose for animal control services.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Mayor James highlighted the various community events included the Cupertino Chamber of
Commerce Asian-American Business luncheon to celebrate the Lunar New Year; a recent
Council study session on economic development; a press conference honoring major donors for
the library fund-raising campaign; the monthly mayor's meeting with city commission
representatives, an upcoming reception for commissioners on February 25; and her participation
on the recent oral board for Sheriff captains.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:40 p.m. Council adjourned to Monday, March I at 5:00 p.m. for a joint study session with
the Planning Commission to consider recommendations from the General Plan Task Force. The
study session will be held in the City Council Chambers, City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue.
Kimberly Smith, City Clerk
For more information: Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the meeting are
available for review at the City Clerk's Office, 777-3223, and also on the Internet at
www.cupertino.org. Click on Agendas & Minutes/ City Council/ Packets.
Most Council meetings are shown live on Cable Channel 26, and are available at your
convenience from our web site. Visit www.cupertino.org and click on Watch Meetings.
Videotapes are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City
Channel, 777-2364.
{-T'
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO. 04-274
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS
AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING
FEBRUARY 13,2004
WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated
representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the
availability of funds for payment hereof; and
WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows
the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set
forth in Exhibit "A".
CERTIFIED:
CtMkf. (). ~
Dir'ector of Administrative Services
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this ~day of March , 2004, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the Citv Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
2-1
02/12/04
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, 8/04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTWN CRITERIA,
.trans_date between "02/09/20"" and "020"/20""
FUND - no
GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
ISSUE DT --- - --VENDOR- -- -- - - - ----- FUND/DEPT
01/30/04 2889 BAY CONSTRUCTION INC 4209n9
02/13/04 1695 3M 2708405
02/13/04 1695 3M 2708405
02/13/04 1695 3M 2708405
02/13/04 1695 3M 2708405
02/13/04 1695 3M 2708405
1020
606062 V
1020
606337
1020 606337
1020 606337
1020 606337
1020 606337
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606338 02/13/04 4 AT & T n08501
1020 606338 02/13/04 4 AT & T n08501
1020 606338 02/13/" 4 AT & T n08501
1020 606338 02/13/04 4 A T & T 1108501
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606339 02/13/04 7 ABAG PLAN CORPORATION 1104540
1020 606340 02/13/04 2982 ABLE UNDERGROUND 2109612
1020 606340 02/13/04 2982 ABLE UNDERGROUND 2109612
1020 606340 02/13/" 2982 ABLE UNDERGROUND 2109612
1020 606340 02/13/04 2982 ABLE UNDERGROUND 2109612
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606341 02/13/04 28 AIRGAS NCN 1108503
1020 606341 02/13/04 28 AIRGAS NCN 1108303
1020 606341 02/13/04 28 AIRGAS NCN 2708405
1020 606341 02/13/04 28 AIRGAS NCN 1108503
1020 606341 02/13/04 28 AIRGAS NCN 1108501
1020 606341 02/13/04 28 AIRGAS NCN 1108501
1020 606341 02/13/04 28 AIRGAS NCN 1108314
1020 606341 02/13/04 28 AIRGAS NCN 6308840
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606342 02/13/04 2276 ALHAMBRA 5706450
1020 606342 02/13/04 2276 ALHAMBRA 1104510
1020 606342 02/13/04 2276 ALHAMBRA 1104510
1020 606342 02/13/04 2276 ALHAMBRA 1104510
1020 606342 02/13/04 2276 ALHAMBRA 1104510
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606343 02/13/04 2849
1020 606344 02/13/04 1452
1020 606345 02/13/04 44
1020 606345 02/13/04 44
TOTAL CHECK
AMERICAN LEGAL PUBLISHIN 1104300
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCI 1107200
AMERICAN RED CROSS
AMERICAN RED CROSS
1104400
1104400
1020
02/13/04 57
1104510
606346
ARAMARK
1020
02/13/04 2298
1104400
606347
ARCH WIRELESS
RUN DATE 02/12/04 TIME 10,35,12
-- ---DESCRIPTION-- ----
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
SUPPLIES NOT TO EXCEED
SUPPLIES NOT TO EXCEED
SUPPLIES NOT TO EXCEED
EC FILM AND 18" TRANSF
EC FILM AND 18" TRANSF
FEB2004 STATEMENT
FEB2004 STATEMENT
FEB2O04 STATEMENT
FEB2004 STATEMENT
FINAL YOUNG DAK OAK
BLUE PHEASANT CLN-OUT
VARIOUS STORM FLUSHED
VARIOUS STORM FLUSHED
SUTTON PARK FLUSHED
FY 2003 -2004 OPEN PURC
FY 2003-2004 OFEN PURC
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC
FY 2003-2004 OPEN FURC
FY 2003-2004 OFEN PURC
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC
BOTTLED DRINKING \'ITR
BOTTLED WATER DEC03
BOTTLED WATER JAN04
BOTTLED WATER JAN04
BOTTLED WATER DEC03
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC
PARKING STANDARDS
MASS CARE REIMBURSE
TRAINING/R . MADDEN
EMPLOYEE COFFEE SERV
6187076-2 2/01-3/01
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
(!Þ
PAGE 1
AMOUNT
698.21
2765.13
107.36
1249.47
214.34
5034.51
47.81
22 .64
22 .64
22.64
115.73
2148.90
360.00
990.00
720.00
720. 00
2790. 00
40 .48
133.92
133.92
133.92
133.92
22 .39
133.92
133.92
866.39
16 .15
182. 00
145.15
171.00
145.15
659.45
180.94
91.00
92.74
375.00
467.74
163.32
19.73
;¿-L
02/12/04
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, 8/04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA, Cransact.trans~date between "02/09/2004" and "02/D/2004"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT --_u_-_u----VENDORu---- FUND/DEPT
1020 606347 02/13/04 2298 ARCH WIRELESS 1108602
1020 606347 02/D/04 2298 ARCH WIRELESS 1106265
1020 606347 02/D/04 2298 ARCH WIRELESS 1108501
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606348 02/D/04 M ASKELAND, COLETTE 580
1020 606349 02/D/04 2469 CAROL AUGUSTINE 1104100
1020 606350 02/13/04 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840
1020 606350 02/13/04 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840
1020 606350 02/13/04 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840
1020 606350 02/13/04 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840
TOTAL CHECK
1020
02/13/04 2889
4209119
606351
BAY CONSTRUCTION mc
1020 606352
1020 606352
TOTAL CHECK
02/D/04 1476
02/D/04 1476
110
110
CANNON DESIGN GROUP
CANNON DESIGN GROUP
1020 606353 02/13/04 M2004 CANTON DELIGHT 5506549
1020 606354 02/13/04 2232 CARIAGA, LOURDES 110
1020 606354 02/13/04 2232 CARIAGA, LOURDES 110
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606355 02/13/04 146 CASH 5806349
1020 606355 02/13/04 146 CASH 5806449
1020 606355 02/13/04 146 CASH 1106343
1020 606355 02/13/04 146 CASH 5706450
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606356 02/13/04 148 CASH 1108407
1020 606356 02/13/04 148 CASH 2708405
1020 606356 02/D/04 148 CASH 1108503
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606357 02/13/04 149 CASH 1104400
1020 606357 02/13/04 149 CASH 1104510
1020 606357 02/13/04 149 CASH 1107301
1020 606357 02/13/04 149 CASH 1108601
1020 606357 02/13/04 149 CASH 1101201
1020 606357 02/13/04 149 CASH 1104100
1020 606357 02/13/04 149 CASH 1104300
1020 606357 02/D/04 149 CASH 1104000
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606358 02/D/04 3089 CEITRONICS, me. 5706450
1020 606358 02/13/04 3089 CEITRONICS, INC. 4239222
TOTAL CHECK
RUN DATE 02/12/04 TIME 10,35,12
PAGE 2
uu-DESCRIPTION--_u- SALES TAX AMOUNT
6187076-2 2/01-3/01 0.00 19.73
6187076-2 2/01-3/01 0.00 12.14
6187076-2 2/01-3/01 0.00 40.36
0.00 91.96
Refund, Check SPRING 0.00 168.00
COURSES/MANUALS AICPA 0.00 305.87
FY 2003 -2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 12.04
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 10. 9S
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 39.73
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 3.65
0.00 66 .37
PARTIAL RETENTION 0.00 36430.16
ARCHITECT RVW R#23804 0.00 720.00
GEOLOGIC RVW R#23822 0.00 890.00
0.00 1610.00
CHINESE N. YEAR LUNCH 0.00 575.00
CSGARNSMNT 0.00 306.50
SSGARNSMNT 0.00 103.84
0.00 410.34
P.CASH 1/13-2/09 0.00 158.31
P.CASH 1/13-2/09 0.00 4.32
P.CASH 1/13-2/09 0.00 42.86
P.CASH 1/13-2/09 0.00 38.91
0.00 244.40
P.CASH 2/02-2/09 0.00 7. 03
P.CASH 2/02-2/09 0.00 42.34
P. CASH 2/02-2/09 0.00 12.99
0.00 62.36
P.CASH 2/04-2/10 0.00 40.73
P.CASH 2/04-2/10 0.00 8.00
P.CASH 2/04-2/10 0.00 20.00
P.CASH 2/04-2/10 0.00 50. 00
P.CASH 2/04-2/10 0.00 5.99
P.CASH 2/04-2/10 O. 00 8.00
P.CASH 2/04-2/10 O. 00 8.00
P.CASH 2/04-2/10 0.00 16.00
0.00 156.72
SOUND SYSTEM 0.00 9825.40
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 121797.85
0.00 131623.25
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
;¿-3
02/12/04
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, 8/04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA,
.trans_date between "02/09/2004" and "02/12/2004"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
ISSUE DT nnnnuuuVENDORu_uuu-_u FUND/DEPT
1020
1020
02/13/04 1057
02/13/04 1057
CERIDIAN BENEFITS SERVIC 110
CERIDIAN BENEFITS SERVIC 110
606359
606359
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606360 02/13/04 1156 CHA 110
1020 606361 02/13/04 2626 CHANG, CHEN-YA 1103300
1020 606362 02/13/04 M CHIANG, JANET 580
1020 606363 02/13/04 173 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450
1020 606364 02/13/04 178 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 110
1020 606364 02/13/04 178 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 110
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606365 02/12/04 3100 COMCAST 5708510
1020 606366 02/13/04 3097 CPR SAVERS AND FIRST AID 1104400
1020 606367 02/12/04 194 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 5606640
1020 606367 02/13/04 194 CUPERTINO SUPPLY mc 5606640
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606368 02/13/04 2866 DIANA R. ELROD 2607401
1020 606369 02/13/04 201 DAPPER TIRE CO 6308840
1020 606370 02/12/04 M DAVIS, DALEEN 580
1020 606371 02/13/04 M DAY, MARILYN 580
1020 606372 02/13/04 210 DEEP CLIFF ASSOCIATES L 5806449
1020 606373 02/13/04 1242 DIGITAL PRINT IMPRESSION 1101060
1020 606373 02/13/04 1242 DIGITAL PRINT IMPRESSION 1108101
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606374 02/12/04 222 OKS ASSOCIATES 2709531
1020 606374 02/13/04 222 OKS ASSOCIATES 4209535
1020 606374 02/12/04 222 OKS ASSOCIATES 4209535
1020 606374 02/13/04 222 OKS ASSOCIATES 4209535
1020 606374 02/13/04 222 OKS ASSOCIATES 4209535
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606375 02/13/04 3117 DOLPHIN DESIGN INC 4239222
1020 606376 02/13/04 3083 DYNAMIC GRAPHICS, INC. 1103400
1020 606377 02/13/04 3114 ELCOR ELECTRIC 4269212
RUN DATE 02/12/04 TIME 10,35,12
PAGE]
_uDESCRIPTION------ SALES TAX AMOUNT
"FLEX DEP/240125 0.00 151. 92
"FLEX HLTH/240125 0.00 718.95
0.00 870.87
CHA 0.00 140.85
CLIPPINGS DEC2003 0.00 200.00
Refund, Check WINTER 0.00 2533.45
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 217.44
COLONIAL/E7013B99 0.00 363.17
"COLONIAL/E7013899 0.00 339.09
0.00 702.26
2/07-3/06 0.00 54.43
CPR MANIKINS AND CPR P 0.00 2188 .52
FY 2003 -2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 114.87
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 78.37
0.00 193.24
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 2390.35
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 274.63
Refund, Check Return 0.00 100.00
Refund, Check Return 0.00 750.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 1248.00
B.CARDS/C.CHIEN 0.00 64.04
B. CARDS/D.ARRANTS 0.00 53.21
0.00 117.25
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 11299.32
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 1885.87
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 15OB.31
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 2604.78
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 6864.83
0.00 24163.11
LIBRARY AQUARIUM 0.00 65000.00
ARTWORK/SCENE 0.00 79.00
REMOVE TEMP WIRING 0.00 942.58
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
:z-y
02/12/04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCOUNTING PERIOO. 8/04
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA. transact-trans_date between "02/09/2004" and "02/13/2004"
FUND -
- GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
ISSUE DT --------------VENDOR-
----- FUND/DEPT
1020 606378 02/13/04 239 ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1108501
1020 606379 02/13/04 242 EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEPT 110
1020 606380 02/13/04 243 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 110
1020 6063B1 02/13/04 249 ESBRO CHEMICAL 5606620
1020 606382 02/13/04 260 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 1104300
1020 606382 02/13/04 260 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 1103300
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606383 02/13/04 3119 GLASER & ASSOCIATES, INC 1104510
1020 606384 02/13/04 298 GRAINGER INC 1108504
1020 606384 02/13/04 298 GRAINGER INC 1108501
1020 606384 02/13/04 298 GRAINGER INC 6308840
1020 606384 02/13/04 298 GRAINGER INC 6308840
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606385 02/13/04 2500 TERRY GREENE 4239222
1020 606386 02/13/04 2630 GREGORY B. BRAGG & ASSOC 6204550
1020 606386 02/13/04 2630 GREGORY B. BRAGG & ASSOC 6204550
1020 606386 02/13/04 2630 GREGORY B. BRAGG & ASSOC 6204550
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606387 02/13/04 2531 GURSHARN SIDHU 5708510
1020 606388 02/13/04 ME2004 HOFFMAN, MABEL 5506549
1020 606389 02/13/04 M HOLMAN, MIKE 580
1020 606390 02/13/04 M HSIAO, CHIN FENG 580
1020 606391 02/13/04 341 ICE CENTER OF CUPERTINO 5806449
1020 606392 02/13/04 343 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110
1020 606393 02/13/04 2528 INDOOR BILLBOARD 1108302
1020 606393 02/13/04 2528 INDOOR BILLBOARD 1108315
1020 606393 02/13/04 2528 INDOOR BILLBOARD 1108314
1020 606393 02/13/04 2528 INDOOR BILLBOARD 1108312
1020 606393 02/13/04 2528 INDOOR BILLBOARD 1108303
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606394 02/13/04 3086 INNERSPACE ENGINEERING C 5708510
1020 606395 02/13/04 995 INSERV COMPANY 1108501
1020 606395 02/13/04 995 INSERV COMPANY 1108504
RUN DATE 02/12/04 TIME 10.35.12
PAGE 4
--- --DESCRIPTION- - ----
SALES TAX
AMOUNT
SUPPLIES A25371 0.00 139.59
SIT/932-0014-5 0.00 17489. 04
SDI/776-5260-0 0.00 1157.70
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 78.78
COURIER SERVICE 0.00 25.25
COURIER SERVICE 0.00 25 .30
0.00 50.55
BEST CLASS/CUPERTINO 0.00 1669.19
PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 273.28
PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 273.27
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 130 .65
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 222.49
0.00 899.69
AHI MANUAL REIMBURSE 0.00 140. 00
H.COMP ADMIN FEB04 0.00 2446.77
H.COMP ADMIN NOV03 0.00 186.12
H.COMP ADM FEE 04/05 0.00 2000.00
0.00 4632.89
TIME/MATERIALS 0.00 1650. 00
BINGO/PIZZA 1/30 0.00 270.00
Refund. Check SPRING 0.00 168.00
Refund. Check HINTER 0.00 120.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 3520. 00
'ICMA 0.00 6031. 75
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 79.12
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 79.11
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 79.12
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 79.12
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 79.12
0.00 395.59
LOCKER ROOM BENCHES 0.00 2050.00
HATER TRTMNT FEB2004 0.00 211.63
HATER TRTMNT FEB20O4 0.00 211.63
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
2-S-
02/12/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 5
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, 8/04 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA, . 'rans_daCe between "02/00/"04" and "02/U/2004"
FUND 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT --------------VENDOR------------- FUND/DEPT - - - --DESCRIPTION- --- -- SALES TAX AMOUNT
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 423.26
1020 606396 02/13/04 353 IRON MOUNTAIN 1104300 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 487.70
1020 606397 02/13/04 2374 JII PROMOTIONS, INC. 1103300 PENS 0.00 992.07
1020 606398 02/13/04 369 KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC 5708510 PAINT SUPPLIES 0.00 76.38
1020 606398 02/13/04 369 KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC 1108406 PAINT SUPPLIES 0.00 21.21
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 97 .59
1020 606399 02/13/04 1630 KIOZ LOVE SOCCER INC 5806449 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 11897.50
1020 606400 02/13/04 2882 ROBERT A. KIM 1103501 CONTROL RM INSTALL 0.00 652.50
1020 606401 02/13/04 2335 KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES 4209546 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 5177.74
1020 606402 02/13/04 2355 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIAT 4209534 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 3207.90
1020 606403 02/13/04 3067 KMVT 15 1101031 PUBLIC ACESS JAN2004 0.00 2964.16
1020 606404 02/13/04 M KORGES, PAM 580 Refund, Check - WINTER 0.00 36.00
1020 606405 02/13/04 M20O4 KRISHNA & JYOTHIRMAYI KI 110 REFD, DEV MAINT FEE 0.00 273.Sl
1020 606406 02/13/04 396 PHILLIP M LENIHAN 5806449 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 122.50
1020 606407 02/13/04 M LUDWIG, SANDRA 580 Refund, Check Return 0.00 750.00
1020 606408 02/13/04 1709 CARMEN LYNAUGH 110Sl01 SUBDIVISION MAP 0.00 148.64
1020 606409 02/13/04 M MA, WEIMIN 580 Refund, Check - WINTER 0.00 140.00
1020 606410 02/13/04 3011 MANNING, COLLEEN 5706450 POSTAGE & SUPPLIES 0.00 757.19
1020 606411 02/13/04 M2O04 MARTHA KANG 110 REFO, DEV MAINT FEE 0.00 378.75
1020 606412 02/13/04 3088 METROTECH CORPORATION 1108830 SUPPLIES 0.00 756.67
1020 606413 02/13/04 444 MINTON'S LUMBER 1108312 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24386 0.00 52.74
1020 606414 02/13/04 2567 MISDU 110 J TRYBUS 385960533 0.00 223.00
1020 606415 02/13/04 447 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 93.67
1020 606415 02/13/04 447 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 93.67
1020 606415 02/13/04 447 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 93.44
1020 606415 02/13/04 447 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 93 .44
1020 606415 02/13/04 447 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 93.67
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 467.89
1020 606416 02/13/04 2448 MO, TERESA F. 5506549 PERFORMANCE 2/19 0.00 50.00
RUN DATE 02/12/04 TIME 10,35,12
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
2-~
02/12/04
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, 8/04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA, transact. trans_date between "02/09/2004" and "02/13/2004"
FUND - 130 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
ISSUE DT _nn__nn_--VENDORnnnn_nn FUND/DEPT
1020 606417 02/13/04 302 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPEN 130
1020 606418 02/13/04 M NEJAT, FARIBA 580
1020 606419 02/13/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1304510
1020 606419 02/13/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1301200
1020 606419 02/13/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1103300
1020 606419 02/13/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1301201
1020 606419 02/13/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1301200
1020 606419 02/13/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1303300
1020 606419 02/13/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1301000
1020 606419 02/13/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1306100
1020 606419 02/13/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1308101
1020 606419 02/13/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1308201
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606420 02/13/04 494 OFFICE DEPOT, INC. 1301500
1020 606421 02/13/04 1390 RONALD OLDS 1303500
1020 606422 02/13/04 501 OPERATING ENGINEERS #3 130
1020 606423 02/13/04 500 OPERATING ENGINEERS PUB 1304510
1020 606423 02/13/04 500 OPERATING ENGINEERS PUB 110
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606424 02/13/04 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HAROWARE 1308508
1020 606424 02/13/04 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1308501
1020 606424 02/13/04 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5708510
1020 606424 02/13/04 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1308501
1020 606424 02/13/04 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5708510
1020 606424 02/13/04 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1308501
1020 606424 02/13/04 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1308503
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606425 02/13/04 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108406
1020 606425 02/13/04 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2708405
1020 606425 02/13/04 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2708404
1020 606425 02/13/04 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1308321
1020 606425 02/13/04 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2708403
1020 606425 02/13/04 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1308303
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606426 02/13/04 833 PER S 110
1020 606426 02/13/04 833 PER S 110
1020 606426 02/13/04 833 PER S 130
1020 606426 02/13/04 833 PER S 110
1020 606426 02/13/04 833 PER S 110
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606427 02/13/04 833 PER S 130
RUN DATE 02/12/04 TIME 10,35,13
n n-DESCRIPTION-- ----
'NAT'L DEF
Refund, Check - Return
COFFEE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CONTROL RM INSTALL
UNION DUES
H & W P.W. RETIRED SP
H & W P.W. EMPLOYEES
PARTS/SUPPLIES
PARTS/SUPPLIES
PARTS/SUPPLIES
PARTS/SUPPLIES
PARTS/SUPPLIES
PARTS/SUPPLIES
PARTS/SUPPLIES
PARTS/SUPPLIES A25342
PARTS/SUPPLIES 20304
PARTS/SUPPLIES 20314
PARTS/SUPPLIES 20307
PARTS/SUPPLIES A25356
PARTS/SUPPLIES A25348
PERS BUYBACK
PERS SPEC
PERS EMPLOYEE
PERS 1959 & BUYBACK
PERS EMPLOYER
PERS EMPLOYEE
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O. 00
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
PAGE 6
AMOUNT
17367.67
300. 00
86.73
1. 50
133. as
28. 06
13.83
11.87
7.56
359.57
169.58
234.55
1044.30
59.26
733.12
715.81
5337.50
4248. 00
9585.50
7.14
95.14
148. 04
108.24
286 .59
47.51
8.09
700.85
62.56
47.60
35.69
50.57
240 .81
219 .42
656.65
586.35
128. 06
25620. as
391.32
6970.39
33696.17
58.64
'z-Î
02/12/04
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, 8/04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA, transact. trans_date between "02/09/2004" and "02/U/2004"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE OT -- - - ------ - - - -VENDOR---- - - - - - - - - - FUND/OEPT
1020 606427 02/U/04 833 PER S 110
1020 606427 02/U/04 833 PER S 110
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606428 02/U/04 2444 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108830
1020 606428 O2/U/04 2444 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108101
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606429 O2/U/04 5U PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 5606620
1020 606429 O2/U/04 5U PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108506
1020 606429 O2/U/04 5U PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 5606620
1020 606429 02/U/04 5U PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108602
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606430 02/U/04 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108315
1020 606430 02/13/04 5U PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108303
1020 606430 02/U/04 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108312
1020 606430 02/13/04 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108314
1020 606430 02/13/04 5U PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108407
1020 606430 02/13/04 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108503
1020 606430 02/13/04 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108504
1020 606430 02/13/04 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 5708510
1020 606430 02/13/04 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108505
1020 606430 02/U/04 513 PACIPIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 5208003
1020 606430 02/U/04 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108830
1020 606430 02/13/04 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 5606620
1020 606430 02/13/04 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 5606640
1020 606430 02/13/04 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108507
1020 606430 02/13/04 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108506
1020 606430 02/13/04 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108511
1020 606430 02/U/04 5U PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108602
1020 606430 02/13/04 5U PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108501
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606431 O2/U/04 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 5708510
1020 606431 02/13/04 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 5708510
1020 606431 02/13/04 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 5708510
1020 606431 02/13/04 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 5708510
1020 606431 02/13/04 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 5708510
1020 606431 02/13/04 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 5708510
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606432 02/13/04 M PAK, SECHONG 580
1020 606433 02/13/04 ME2004 PAUL SPITS EN 5506549
1020 606434 02/13/04 533 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROG 110
1020 606435 02/13/04 M POORMAND, MEHRDAD 580
1020 606436 02/13/04 559 PROJECT SENTINEL 1107405
RUN OATE 02/12/04 TIME 10,35,13
-----OESCRIPTION- -----
PERS EMPLOYER
PERS 1959 & BUYBACK
12/20-1/21
12/20-1/21 RICOCHET
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
1/01-1/29
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
12/25-1/26
MONITOR FEE FEB04
MONITOR FEE MAR04
MONITOR FEE MAR04
MONITOR FEE JAN04
MONITOR FEE FEB04
MONITOR FEE JAN04
Refund, Check SPRING
TIPS 2/22 & 2/26
PERS LTC/2405
Refund, Check WINTER
10/01-12/31
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
PAGE 7
AMOUNT
216.60
93.86
369.10
22596.55
663.13
23259.68
122.16
4.86
100.40
38.99
266 .41
214.65
3928.73
308.37
386.64
1186.58
1821.81
3687.97
4082 .52
1384.76
7.92
55.35
1338.81
191.02
1578.12
200.98
333.87
2569.32
4672.66
27950.08
5.00
5.00
5.00
3.91
5.00
3.91
27 .82
390.00
100.00
117.80
94.50
6250.00
2-F'
02/12/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 8
ACCOUNTING PERIOO. 8/04 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA. transact-trans_date between "02/09/2004" and "02/U/2004"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE OT nnnnnnnVENDOR-nnnnnn FUND/DEPT _n_-DESCRIPTION-nu- SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 606437 02/U/04 3093 Q.C.DOUGHTY 5706450 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 339.20
1020 606438 02/U/04 M RANGWALA, ZOAIB 580 Refund. Check - Return 0.00 450.00
1020 606439 02/U/04 601 ROYAL BRASS INC 6308840 HOSE ASSEMBLY 20212 0.00 8.95
1020 606440 02/U/04 602 ROYAL COACH TOURS 5506549 TRANSPORTATION 1/30 0.00 511.92
1020 606444 02/U/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 70.85
1020 606444 02/U/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 70.85
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 38.76
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 62 .55
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 15.87
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 15.87
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 15.87
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 9.37
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 9.37
1020 606444 .02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 15.87
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 38.76
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 38.76
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 134.90
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 51. 57
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 131.24
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108408 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 120.26
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 87.31
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 87.31
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 72.67
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 114.76
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 32.34
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606640 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 222.20
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 9.00
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 78.16
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 70.85
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 200.78
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 406.11
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 12/03-2/04/04 0.00 255.78
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/04-2/04/04 0.00 19.00
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 4209116 12/03-2/04/04 0.00 146.71
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108502 1/02-2/02/04 LIBRARY 0.00 36 .50
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108505 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 112.94
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108505 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 9.00
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 1/02-2/02/04 0.00 36 .50
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 99.70
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 177.65
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 261.23
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 121. 94
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 121. 95
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 123.80
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 125.65
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 1/02-2/02/04 0.00 36 .50
RUN DATE 02/12/04 TIME 10.35.13 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
2--1
02/12/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 9
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, 8/04 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA, . trans_date between "02/09/2004" and "02/B/2004"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT - ------- -- - ---VENDOR--- - - - - --- --- FUND/DEPT -----DESCRIPTION------ SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 606444 02/B/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 155.38
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 52.30
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 38.76
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 88.18
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108506 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 32.34
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 11.20
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 38.76
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 15.87
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 15.87
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 61. 69
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 1/02-2/02/04 0.00 36.50
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 15.87
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 9.00
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 9.37
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108506 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 46.98
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 15.87
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 15.87
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 15.87
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 131.24
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 38.76
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 261.18
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 61.69
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 105.62
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 233.73
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108503 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 79.99
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 61.69
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 63.52
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 65.35
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108507 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 79.99
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 81.82
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 112.94
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108302 12/30-1/30/04 0.00 69. 01
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 12/30-1/30/04 O. 00 122. 09
1020 606444 02/13/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 12/31-1/30/04 0.00 9.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 6160.36
1020 606445 02/13/04 258 SANTA CLARA COUNTY 110 V ORTEGA 563312780 0.00 588.00
1020 606446 02/13/04 2031 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CITIE 1101200 D. KNAPP 0.00 37.50
1020 606446 02/13/04 2031 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CITIE 1101000 D. SANDOVAL 0.00 37.50
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 75.00
1020 606447 02/13/04 633 SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERI 5806349 DANCE 1/23 0.00 433 .10
1020 606448 02/13/04 1648 SAVIN CORPORATION (SUPPL 1104310 H2400800225 2/13-5/12 0.00 159.48
1020 606449 02/13/04 2875 SAVIN CREDIT CORP 1104310 JO131303354 MAR04 o. 00 114.66
1020 606450 02/13/04 2397 SAVIN CREDIT CORPORATION 1104310 H2400800225 MAR2004 o. 00 137.83
1020 606451 02/13/04 2692 SBC 1108504 12/27-1/26 0.00 77.30
RUN DATE 02/12/04 TIME 10,35,13
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Å -10
02/12/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 10
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, s/04 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA, transact. crans_date between "02/09/2004" and "02/1312004"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT ---- -- --------VENDOR- -- - - - - - ----- FUNDIDEPT - ----DESCRIPTION------ SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 606451 02/13/04 2692 SBC 1108501 12/28-1/28 0.00 64.74
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 142. 04
1020 606452 02/13104 2692 SBC 1106500 12/29-1/28 0.00 54.84
1020 606452 02/13/04 2692 SBC 5606620 12/"-1128 0.00 106.66
1020 606452 02/13/04 2692 SBC 5606640 12/29-1/28 0.00 285.36
1020 606452 02/13/04 2692 SBC 1108201 12/29-1/28 0.00 252.05
1020 606452 02/13/04 2692 SBC 1108501 12/29-1/28 0.00 116.06
1020 606452 02/13/04 2692 SBC 1108503 12/29-1/28 0.00 58.00
1020 606452 02/13104 2692 SBC 1108507 12/29-1/28 0.00 54.84
1020 606452 02/13/04 2692 SBC 1108508 12/29-1/28 0.00 60.66
1020 606452 02/13104 2692 SBC 1108509 12/29-1/28 0.00 54.83
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1043 .30
1020 606453 02/13104 511 SBCIMCI 1101500 #2719770 1/01-2/06 0.00 89.09
1020 606453 02/13/04 511 SBCIMCI 1108501 #2719770 1/01-2/06 0.00 89 .09
1020 606453 02/13/04 511 SBCIMCI 1108504 #2719770 1/01-2/06 o. 00 89. 08
1020 606453 02/13/04 511 SBclMCI 1108505 #2719770 1/01-2/06 0.00 89 .08
1020 606453 02/13/04 511 SBCIMCI 5708510 #2719770 1/01-2/06 0.00 89. 08
1020 606453 02/13/04 511 SBclMCI 1108503 #2719770 1/01-2/06 0.00 89 .08
1020 606453 02/13/04 511 SBclMCI 5606620 #2719770 1/01-2/06 0.00 89 .08
1020 606453 02/13/04 511 SBclMCI 1101500 #2719421 1/01-2/06 0.00 244.27
1020 606453 02/13/04 511 SBclMCI 1108501 #2719771 1/01-2/06 0.00 89. 08
1020 606453 02/13/04 511 SBclMCI 1108501 #2719421 1/01-2/06 0.00 244.27
1020 606453 02/13/04 511 SBCIMCI 1108505 #2719421 1/01-2/06 0.00 244.27
1020 606453 02/13/04 511 SBclMCI 5708510 #2719421 1/01-2/06 0.00 244.27
1020 606453 02/13/04 511 SBCIMCI 1108504 #2719421 1/01-2/06 0.00 488 .51
1020 606453 02/13/04 511 SBCIMCI 1108503 #2719421 1/01-2/06 0.00 244.27
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2422.52
1020 606454 02/13/04 2439 SERVICE STATION SYSTEMS, 6308840 TlMEIMATERIALS 0.00 401. 37
1020 606455 02/13/04 2051 SIADAT ENTERPRISES, INC. 6308840 CAR WASHES JAN2004 0.00 65. 00
1020 606456 0'/13/04 2129 SIERRA ORGANICS COMPANY 1108314 PLAYGROUND MATERIALS 0.00 604.40
1020 606456 02/13/04 2129 SIERRA ORGANICS COMPANY 1108303 PLAYGROUND MATERIALS 0.00 604.41
1020 606456 02/13/04 2129 SIERRA ORGANICS COMPANY 1108315 PLAYGROUND MATERIALS 0.00 604.38
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 1813.19
1020 606457 02/13/04 2810 SMART & FINAL 5706450 SUPPLIES A26204 0.00 240.14
1020 606458 02/13/04 671 STANDARD BUSINESS MACHIN 4239222 CANNON IR2010F COPIER 0.00 351. 81
1020 606459 02/13/04 1011 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 110 PREPAYMENT JAN04 0.00 743. 00
1020 606460 02/13/04 677 STATE STREET BANK & TRUS 110 .PERS DEF 0.00 4007.56
1020 606461 02/13/04 1012 STOREFRONT DOOR SERVICE 1108504 TIMEIMATERIALS 0.00 2250. 00
1020 606462 02/13/04 1406 SUNNYVALE CHEVROLET 6308840 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 11.24
RUN DATE 02/12/04 TIME 10,35,13
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
,2--11
02/12/04
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, 8/04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
SELECTION CRITER'A, transact. trans_date between "02/09/2004" and "02/12/2004"
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
FUND - 1l0 - GENERAL FUND
ISSUE DT uuuuuuuVENDORuuuuuu- FUND/DEPT
1020 606463
1020 606464
1020 606464
1020 606464
1020 606464
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606465
1020 606466
1020 606467
1020 606468
1020 606469
1020 606470
1020 606471
1020 6.06472
1020 606472
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606473
1020 606474
1020 606474
1020 606474
1020 606474
1020 606474
1020 606474
TOTAL CHECK
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT
TOTAL FUND
TOTAL REPORT
02/13/04 2045 SVCN 1l04300
02/13/04 701 TARGET STORES 5706450
02/13/04 701 TARGET STORES 1l06265
02/13/04 701 TARGET STORES 5806349
02/13/04 701 TARGET STORES 5706450
02/13/04 1993
02/13/04 2781
02/13/04 1737
02/13/04 3017
02/13/04 1154
02/13/04 738
02/13/04 745
02/13/04 779
02/13/04 779
02/13/04 774
02/13/04 1608
02/13/04 1608
02/13/04 1608
02/13/04 1608
02/13/04 1608
02/13/04 1608
TREASURER OF ALAMEDA COU 1l0
AL TSUGAWA
1l04400
U S POSTMASTER
1103400
ULI-THE URBAN LAND INSTI 1l07200
UNITED WAY OF SANTA CLAR 110
VALLEY OIL COMPANY
6308840
VMI INC
1103501
WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO INC 1108504
WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO INC 5708510
WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS 2708405
ZACK ELECTRONICS INC 1103500
ZACK ELECTRONICS INC 4209546
ZACK ELECTRONICS INC 4209546
ZACK ELECTRONICS INC 4209546
ZACK ELECTRONICS INC 4209546
ZACK ELECTRONICS INC 4209546
RUN DATE 02/12/04 TIME 10,35,13
h---DESCRIPTION--hu
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC
SUPPLIES A26282
SUPPLIES 25476
SUPPLIES 25472
SUPPLIES A25675
A LOPEZ JR 566398126
INSTRUCTOR TRAINING
BUS REPLY PERMIT 326
5 COPIES PLACE MAKING
UNITEO WAY
FUEL
RENTAL 16474
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC
CABLES & CONNECTORS
CABLES CONNECTORS HEAT
CABLES CONNECTORS HEAT
CABLES CONNECTORS HEAT
CABLES CONNECTORS HEAT
CABLES CONNECTORS HEAT
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
PAGE 11
AMOUNT
49.50
62.72
43.25
50.43
66 .54
222.94
253.84
150.00
150.00
336.47
99.00
32.68
167.79
256 .07
310.46
566 .53
906.36
1173.89
34.90
277.16
96.78
256.81
1343.59
3183.13
469191. 24
469191.24
469191.24
2 -{:J-
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO. 04-275
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS
AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRffiED FOR GENERAL AND
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING
FEBRUARY 20,2004
WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated
representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the
availability of funds for payment hereof; and
WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows
the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set
forth in Exhibit "A".
CERTIFIED:
{]¡;AjJ~ 0 a III )7~
Director of Administrative Services
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this --1§.Lday of March , 2004, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the Citv Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
2 ~fJ
02/19/04
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, B/04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA, transact-trans_date between "02/16/2004" and "02/20/2004"
FUND - no - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
ISSUE DT --------------VENDOR------------- FUND/DEFT
1020
1020
02/13/04 1476
02/13/04 1476
no
no
606352 V
606352 V
CANNON DESIGN GROUP
CANNON DESIGN GROUP
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606475 02/20/04 4 AT & T nOB501
1020 606476 02/20/04 9 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO nOB509
1020 606476 02/20/04 9 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO nOB501
1020 606476 02/20/04 9 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO nOB507
1020 606476 02/20/04 9 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO 570B510
1020 606476 02/20/04 9 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO nOB505
1020 606476 02/20/04 9 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO nOB504
1020 606476 02/20/04 9 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO 5606620
1020 606476 02/20/04 9 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO nOB503
1020 606476 02/20/04 9 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO nO8506
1020 606476 02/20/04 9 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO nO8508
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606477 02/20/04 29 LYNNE DIANE AITKEN 5806449
1020 606478 02/20/04 1884 ALBERTSONS-NORTHERN DIVI 5806349
1020 606478 02/20/04 1884 ALBERTSONS-NORTHERN DIVI 58063"
1020 606478 02/20/04 1884 ALBERTSONS-NORTHERN DIVI 5706450
1020 606478 02/20/04 1884 ALBERTSONS-NORTHERN DIVI 5806349
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606479 02/20/04 M ALl, YASMIN 580
1020 606480 02/20/04 2849 AMERICAN LEGAL PUBLISHIN n04300
1020 606481 02/20/04 2945 NATASHA AUSTIN 5806249
1020 606482 02/20/04 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840
1020 606482 02/20/04 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840
1020 606482 02/20/04 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840
1020 606482 02/20/04 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606483 02/20/04 51 DR JOEL BERGER 58064"
1020 6064B4 02/20/04 3063 DINA BISTRY 5806449
1020 6064B5 02/20/04 100 BMI IMAGING SYSTEMS n04300
1020 606486 02/20/04 28B7 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL n04000
1020 606487 02/20/04 130 CALIFORNIA PARK AND RECR 5606600
1020 606488 02/20/04 n45 CALIFORNIA SURVEYING & 0 nOBlOl
1020 606489 02/20/04 1476 CANNON DESIGN GROUP no
RUN DATE 02/19/04 TIME 10,03,07
(yß-
PAGE 1
- - - --DESCRIFTION------ SALES TAX AMOUNT
ARCHITECT RVW R#23B04 0.00 -720.00
GEOLOGIC RVW R#23B22 0.00 -890.00
0.00 -1610.00
FEB2004 STATEMENT 0.00 22.64
FEB 2004 & TRUE-UP 0.00 63.35
FEB 2004 & TRUE-UP 0.00 1342.39
FEB 2004 & TRUE-UP 0.00 392.55
FEB 2004 & TRUE-UP 0.00 663.15
FEB 2004 & TRUE-UP 0.00 251.0B
FEB 2004 & TRUE-UP 0.00 2179 .21
FEB 2004 & TRUE-UP 0.00 787.65
FEB 2004 & TRUE-UP 0.00 772.42
FEB 2004 & TRUE-UP 0.00 130.93
FEB 2004 & TRUE-UP 0.00 59 .27
0.00 6642.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT POR 0.00 336.00
SUPPLIES 25473 0.00 13.56
SUPPLIES 22977 0.00 32.16
SUPPLIES A26202 0.00 29.58
SUPPLIES 25471 0.00 2.29
0.00 77.99
Refund, Check Return 0.00 300.00
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 1850.94
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 725.00
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 15.20
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 39.40
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 45.14
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 26.28
0.00 126.02
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 180.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 167.50
MICROFILMING 0.00 1465.72
DUES 4/01/04-3/31/05 0.00 120.00
016368 M.O'DOWD RNWL 0.00 125.00
READER PAPER 0.00 66 .97
ARCHITECT RVW R23B04 0.00 720.00
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
2-1l(
02/19/04
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, 8/04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
PAGE 2
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA, transact-trans_date between "02/16/2004" and "02/20/2004"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
ISSUE OT --------------VENDOR---- ------- FUND/DEPT
-----DESCRIPTION-- - ---
SALES TAX
AMOUNT
1020 606490 02/20/04 1948 CARROT-TOP INDUSTRIES IN 1101065 FLAG 0.00 15.00
1020 606491 02/20/04 144 CASH 5606620 P.CASH 10/28-2/09/04 0.00 80.00
1020 606491 02/20/04 144 CASH 5606640 P. CASH 10/28 -2/09/04 0.00 36.94
1020 606491 02/20/04 144 CASH 5806649 P. CASH 10/28 -2/09/04 0.00 30.49
1020 606491 02/20/04 144 CASH 1106647 P.CASH 10/28-2/09/04 0.00 79.71
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 227.14
1020 606492 02/20/04 M CHEN, HUI CHEN 580 Refund, Check - WINTER 0.00 62 .00
1020 606493 02/20/04 M2004 CHEN, MIKE 110 REFD UNUSED MAIL DPST 0.00 124.90
1020 606494 02/20/04 1363 CLEAN SOURCE 1108501 SUPPLIES 0.00 64.95
1020 606495 02/20/04 3032 CONSTRUCTION TESTING SER 4239222 PUELIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 4412.00
1020 606496 02/20/04 183 COTTON SHIRES & ASSO INC 110 GEOLOGIC RVW R23822 0.00 890.00
1020 606497 02/20/04 191 CUPERTINO CHAMBER OF COM 2204011 TLT MTG 1/20 SUPPLIES 0.00 45.89
1020 606498 02/20/04 1579 CUPERTINO LOC-N-STOR LLC 1108501 UNIT G-34 RENT MAR04 0.00 217.00
1020 606498 02/20/04 1579 CUPERTINO LOC-N-STOR LLC 1108503 UNIT G-33 RENT MAR04 0.00 217.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 434.00
1020 606499 02/20/04 2992 WILLIAM T. DALY 2709435 YELLOW SAFE LANE 4" HI 0.00 4710.31
1020 606500 02/20/04 2321 DAVCO WATERPROFFING SERV 5708510 REPAIRS 0.00 826.50
1020 606501 02/20/04 676 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1104510 FINGERPRINTS JAN04 0.00 288 .00
1020 606502 02/20/04 2795 DEVCON ASSOCIATES XVI 4239222 TEMP LBRY RENT MAR04 0.00 16180.00
1020 606503 02/20/04 2864 DIAMOND TRIUMPH AUTO GLA 6308840 REPAIRS A25321 0.00 100.00
1020 606504 02/20/04 2664 KATHLEEN DUTRA 5806449 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 728 .00
1020 606505 02/20/04 239 ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 5708510 PIPE PIER SUPPORTS 0.00 212.55
1020 606506 02/20/04 240 ELIZABETH ANN ELLIS 1101070 TRANS CRIPE 7-12/03 0.00 2425 .00
1020 606506 02/20/04 240 ELIZABETH ANN ELLIS 1101070 TRANSCRIBE 1/12-2/09 0.00 1050.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 3475.00
1020 606507 02/20/04 234 ENGINEERING DATA SERVICE 1104300 PUBLIC HEAR NDTICES 0.00 649.98
1020 606507 02/20/04 234 ENGINEERING DATA SERVICE 110 MAIL SERV 11/24-1/12 0.00 1702.66
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2352.64
1020 606508 02/20/04 250 EUPHRAT MUSEUM OF ART 5806249 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 5510.50
1020 606509 02/20/04 260 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 110 COURIER SERV R#23277 0.00 15.81
RUN DATE 02/19/04 TIME 10,03,07
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
2-/5'
02/1'104 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 3
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, B/04 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA, transact. trans_date between "02/16/2004" and "02/20/200."
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT --- -- - -- -- -- --VENDOR- - ----------- FUNDIDEPT ---- -DESCRIPTION-- -- - - SALES TAX AMOUNT
1020 606510 02/20/04 3062 JULIA FENG 5B06449 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 891.0'
1020 606511 02/20/04 2304 FIELD PAOLI ARCHITECTURE 426n12 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 200.51
1020 606511 02/20/04 2304 FIELD PAOLI ARCHITECTURE 4269212 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 184 .00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 384.51
1020 606512 02/20/04 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1106343 JAN2004 STATEMENT 0.00 3610.53
102O 606512 02/20104 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 5B0644' JAN2004 STATEMENT 0.00 11'.40
102O 606512 02/20/04 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1106647 JAN2004 STATEMENT 0.00 33.20
102O 606512 02/20/04 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 5BO6349 JAN2004 STATEMENT 0.00 131.55
1020 606512 02/20/04 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1101065 JAN2O04 STATEMENT 0.00 122.18
1020 606512 02/20/04 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 580634' JAN2004 STATEMENT 0.00 16.38
1020 606512 02/20/04 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 5806249 JAN2004 STATEMENT 0.00 153.27
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 4186.51
1020 606513 02/20/04 262 FIRST PLACE INC 1104300 NAME SIGNS 17133 0.00 23.32
1020 606514 02/20104 2500 TERRY GREENE 4238222 LIBRARY PHOTOS 0.00 60.64
1020 606515 02/20/04 315 JILL HAFF 5B06449 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 455.00
1020 606516 02/20104 318 HANDS ON LEARNING 5806349 SCIENCE KITS 0.00 1825.64
1020 606517 02/20/04 M2O04 HOULSBY, DENNIS 110 REPO UNUSED MAIL DPST 0.00 125.27
1020 606518 02/20/04 2027 MARSHA HOVEY 1104400 MISC SUPPLIES 0.00 141. 51
1020 606519 02/20/04 2285 KATHRYN KELLY JOESTEN 1106265 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 212.50
1020 606520 02/20/04 M KIM, YOUNG 5BO Refund, Check - WINTER 0.00 55.00
1020 606521 02/20/04 30n KATHY KLEIN 5806449 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 220.00
1020 606522 02/20/04 2300 BARBARA LAUX 5506549 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 800.00
1020 606523 02/20/04 M2004 LAW, FRANKIE 110 REPO UNUSED MAIL DPST 0.00 125.27
1020 606524 02/20/04 390 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 2708405 SUPPLIES A25385 0.00 170.24
1020 606525 02/20104 M2004 LE, CU 110 REPO UNUSED MAIL DPST 0.00 94.31
102O 606526 02/20/04 M LEUNG, LOUISE 580 Refund, Check - WINTER 0.00 149.50
1020 606527 02/20/04 M2004 MARESWMAN, MOHAN 110 REFD UNUSED MAIL DPST 0.00 115.76
102O 606528 02/20104 1602 MBIA MUNISERVICES COMPAN 1100000 S.TAX AUDIT 9/30103 0.00 1093 .50
102O 6065" 02/20/04 2713 REBECCA MCCORMICK 5806449 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 336.00
1020 606530 02/20/04 M MCORMICK, JOHANNA 580 Refund, Check - SPRING 0.00 195.00
RUN DATE 02/19/04 TIME 10,03,07
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
J- -I !o
02/19/04
ACCOUNTING PERIOO, B/04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA, transact-trans_date between "02/16/2004" and "02/20/2004"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
1020
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
606531
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
TOTAL CHECK
1020
1020
606532
606533
606533
606533
606533
606533
606533
606533
606533
606533
606533
606533
606533
606534
606535
1020 606536
1020 606536
TOTAL CHECK
1020
1020
TOTAL CHECK
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
1020
606537
606537
606538
606539
606540
606541
606542
606543
606544
606545
606546
606547
606548
02/20/04 3041
ISSUE DT u_uuuuu-VENDOR-uuuuuu FUND/DEPT
5506549
02/20/04 M2004
02/20/04 493
02/20/04 493
02/20/04 493
02/20/04 493
02/20/04 493
02/20/04 493
02/20/04 493
02/20/04 493
02/20/04 493
02/20/04 493
02/20/04 493
02/20/04 493
02/20/04 3095
02/20/04 1190
02/20/04 515
02/20/04 515
02/20/04 690
02/20/04 690
02/20/04 543
02/20/04 545
02/20/04 M
02/20/04 M
02/20/04 1247
02/20/04 3106
02/20/04 2441
02/20/04 581
02/20/04 1071
02/20/04 B42
02/20/04 601
MADHUWANTI MlRASHI
NORTON, DENNIS
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE DEPOT
EVAN OLDS
RONALD OLDS
110
1106343
1104000
1107301
1107503
1107503
1107301
1104510
1107405
1107301
5BO6249
5706450
110B601
1103501
1103500
PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 570B510
PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 110B503
PENINSULA FORD
PENINSULA FORD
PINPOINT
JEFF PISERCHIO
POURABDOLLAH, FARIDEH
POURABDOLLAH, FARIDEH
MARIE PRESTON
630BS40
630BS40
1108201
5606640
5BO
5BO
1106448
PUBLIC RESOURCE MGMNT GR 1107200
5806249
RENEE RAMSEY
RELIABLE
REPUBLIC ELECTRIC
ROBERT A BOTHMAN INC
ROYAL BRASS INC
RUN DATE 02/19/04 TIME 10.03,07
1107503
4209535
4259313
630BS40
uu-DESCRIPTION-_uu
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
REFD UNUSED MAIL DPST
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
COFFEE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
REF, 230810527001
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CONTROL ROOM INSTALL
CONTROL ROOM INSTALL
BLUE PRINTS
SERVICE CALL 1/21
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC
FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC
EMPLOYEE JACKETS
2/04-2/17 SERVICES
Refund, Check
WINTER
Refund, Check - Return
SUPPLIES
DEV FEE & RATE STUDY
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
HOSES A253B6
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
PAGE 4
AMOUNT
lBO. 00
105.04
6.76
240.46
47.26
37.12
7.75
116. 07
B6.73
175.76
118.65
63 .81
-27.21
102.37
975.53
1098 .00
790.62
90.81
lBO.OO
270 .81
63 .00
165.BS
228.BS
1021. 33
1956.00
140. 00
300.00
67.08
4350. 00
891.25
3B.94
194525.00
249655.95
285. 06
,l-n
02/19/04
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, 8/04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CR"ERIA,
.trans_date between "02/16/2004" and "02/20/2004"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
ISSUE DT --------------VENDOR------------- FUND/DEPT
1020 606549 02/20/04 2833 THEA RUNYAN 5806449
1020 606550 02/20/04 2011 S.O.S. SURVIVAL PRODUCTS 1104400
1020 606551 02/20/04 1069 SAFE-HIT CORPORATION 2708405
1020 606552 02/20/04 621 THE MERCURY NEWS 4239222
1020 606553 02/20/04 626 SANTA CLARA CO DEFT OF R 1102100
1020 606554 02/20/04 630 SANTA CLARA CO FROBATION 1102100
1020 606555 02/20/04 628 SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERI 1102100
1020 606556 02/20/04 2692 SBC 1108501
1020 606556 02/20/04 2692 SBC 1108501
1020 606556 02/20/04 2692 SBC 5708510
1020 606556 02/20/04 2692 SBC 1108501
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606557 02/20/04 M SHABROVA, YELENA 580
1020 606558 02/20/04 647 ELI2ABETH SHANNON 5806449
1020 606559 02/20/04 M SHEN, YONGHONG 580
1020 606560 02/20/04 M2004 SHEU, CHII-CHING 110
1020 606561 02/20/04 652 SIERRA SPRINGS WATER CO. 1101500
1020 606562 02/20/04 2415 SIMON MARTIN-VEGUE WINKE 4239222
1020 606562 02/20/04 2415 SIMON MARTIN-VEGUE WINKE 4239222
1020 606562 02/20/04 2415 SIMON MARTIN-VEGUE WINKE 4239222
1020 606562 02/20/04 2415 SIMON MARTIN-VEGUE WINKE 4239222
1020 606562 02/20/04 2415 SIMON MARTIN-VEGUE WINKE 4239222
1020 606562 02/20/04 2415 SIMON MARTIN-VEGUE WINKE 4239222
1020 606562 02/20/04 2415 SIMON MARTIN-VEGUE WINKE 4239222
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606563 02/20/04 2810 SMART & FINAL 5806249
1020 606563 02/20/04 2810 SMART & FINAL 1106343
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606564 02/20/04 1548 SOLANO PRESS BOOKS 1101500
1020 606565 02/20/04 684 CHERYL STOODARD 5806449
1020 606566 02/20/04 3045 SUGIMURA & ASSOCIATES 1108501
1020 606566 02/20/04 3045 SUGlMURA & ASSOCIATES 1108101
1020 606566 02/20/04 3045 SUGlMURA & ASSOCIATES 4209225
RUN DATE 02/19/04 TIME 10,03,07
PAGE 5
-----DESCRIPTION------
SALES TAX
AMOUNT
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 780.80
MASKS EMERGENCY RADIOS 0.00 554 .55
SUPPLIES ENERGY ABS. 0.00 560.41
ADS 557223 0.00 2440.68
CITATIONS DEC2O03 0.00 2390.00
10/03-12/03 0.00 7853.36
LAW ENFORCEMENT FEB04 0.00 477846.40
1/08 -2/07 PAY PHONE 0.00 55.13
1/08-2/07 PAY PHONE 0.00 55.13
1/08 -2/07 PAY PHONE 0.00 55.13
1/08 -2/07 PAY PHONE 0.00 55.13
0.00 220.52
Refund, Check - WINTER 0.00 110.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 700.00
Refund, Check - SPRING 0.00 245.00
REFD UNUSED MAIL DPST 0.00 240.70
BOTTLED DRINK WATER 0.00 15.02
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 4710.72
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 6320.00
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 35378.36
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 1945.00
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 3922.20
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 29424.85
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 27934.20
0.00 109635.33
SUPPLIES A25739 0.00 17.28
SUPPLIES A25739 0.00 52.50
0.00 69.78
CURTIN'S LAND USE 0.00 59.62
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 385.00
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 401.89
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 435.39
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 1491.85
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
1-{ J
02/19/04
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, 8/04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
PAGE 6
SELECTION CRITERIA, transact. trans_date between "O2fl6/20O4" and "02/20/2004"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT nnnn_nn-VENDQR----_n_nn- FUND/DEPT -----DESCRIPTIONnn- - SALES TAX AMOUNT
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 2329.13
1020 606567 02/20/04 529 SUNGARD PENTAMATION, INC 6104800 DATA LINE CHRGS JAN04 0.00 122.48
1020 606567 02/20/04 529 SUNGARD PENTAMATION, INC 6104800 DATALINE CHARGES 0.00 172.38
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 294.86
1020 606568 02/20/04 1406 SUNNYVALE CHEVROLET 6308840 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 14.40
1020 606568 02/20/04 1406 SUNNYVALE CHEVROLET 6308840 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 139.06
1020 606568 02/20/04 1406 SUNNYVALE CHEVROLET 6308840 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 28.79
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 182 .25
1020 606569 02/20/04 2045 SVCN 1104300 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 66 .00
1020 606569 02/20/04 2045 SVCN 1104300 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 44.00
1020 606569 02/20/04 2045 SVCN 1104300 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 63 .25
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 173.25
1020 606570 02/20/04 3013 SWINERTON BUILDERS 4239222 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 396486 .00
1020 606570 02/20/04 3013 SWINERTON BUILDERS 2159620 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 200000.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 596486.00
1020 606571 02/20/04 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 REF 310011551 RETURNS 0.00 -204.43
1020 606571 02/20/04 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 REF 310011551 RETURNS 0.00 -20.90
1020 606571 02/20/04 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 REF 310011551 RETURNS 0.00 -6.97
1020 606571 02/20/04 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 PAPER/FOOD SUPPLIES 0.00 190.32
1020 606571 02/20/04 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 COFFEE & SUPPLIES 0.00 545.86
1020 606571 02/20/04 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 BINGO DESSERTS 0.00 453.54
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 957.42
1020 606572 02/20/04 701 TARGET STORES 5706450 SUPPLIES A26203 0.00 64 .52
1020 606573 02/20/04 708 NANCY THOMPSON 5806449 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 409.50
1020 606574 02/20/04 M2004 TRAFFIC SIGNAL ASSOC. 1108601 MERSHP FEES GUAPO O. 00 25.00
1020 606574 02/20/04 M2004 TRAFFIC SIGNAL ASSOC. 1108602 FEES VANDEVEER/CORRY 0.00 50.00
TOTAL CHECK 0.00 75.00
1020 606575 02/20/04 2665 ERIN TURI 5806249 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 2669.25
1020 606576 02/20/04 2979 VCI TELECOM INC 4209534 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 140063.34
1020 606577 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108501 #308957246 JAN2004 0.00 36.49
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1101200 #408456999 JAN2004 0.00 51.10
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108602 #408456999 JAN2004 0.00 231.80
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108005 #408456999 JAN2004 0.00 103.32
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108505 #408456999 JAN2004 0.00 94.48
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108102 #408456999 JAN2004 0.00 150.97
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 5208003 #408456999 JAN2004 0.00 47 .15
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1107503 #408456999 JAN2004 0.00 273.39
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108503 #408456999 JAN2004 0.00 99.59
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108501 #408456999 JAN2004 0.00 603.17
RUN DATE 02/19/04 TIME 10,03,08 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
2-{~
02/19/04
ACCOUNTING PERIOD, 8/04
SELECTION CRITERIA,
CITY OF CUPERTINO
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
.trans_date between "02/16/2004" and "02/20/2004"
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
ISSUE OT _u- -uuuuVENDORn_u_u_uu FUND/DEPT
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108201
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 5606620
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1102403
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1107501
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108504
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 5806649
1020 606578 02/20/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 6104800
TOTAL CHECK
1020 606579 02/20/04 779
1020 606580 02/20/04 2412
1020 606581 02/20/04 M2004
1020 606582 02/20/04 3014
1020 606583 02/20/04 M
1020 606584 02/20/04 M
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT
TOTAL FUND
TOTAL REPORT
RUN DATE 02/19/04 TIME 10,03,08
WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO INC 1108504
WESTERN PACIFIC DISTRIBU 1108504
WILEY CUSTOMER CARE
4239222
XL CONSTRUCTION CORPORAT 4269212
YD, SHU HWA
580
YU, YING
580
-" u -DESCRIPTIONu - - u
#408456999 JAN2004
#408456999 JAN2004
#408456999 JAN2004
#408456999 JAN2004
#408456999 JAN2004
#408456999 JAN2004
#408456999 JAN2004
LIGHTING SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
INTER GRAPHICS STNDRD
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
Refund, Check - WINTER
Refund, Check - WINTER
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PAGE 7
AMOUNT
442.10
47.15
77 .98
56.66
390.38
47.15
51.10
2767.49
1768 .10
39 .48
194.85
36918.00
150.00
55.55
1910272.78
1910272.78
1910272.78
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
2 <2{)
CITY OF
CUPEIQ1NO
City Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3220
Fax: (408) 777-3366
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Agenda Item No. J
Meeting Date: March 1,2004
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Accept the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for 2002-2003.
BACKGROUND
We are pleased to inform you that our auditors, Maze and Associates has completed the audit and
compiled the financial statements for our Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003. A draft of this report was discussed in detail with the City's
Audit Committee.
This CAFR conforms to GASB Statement 34, Basic Financial Statements - and Management's
Discussion and Analysis- for State and Local Governments. As such, this year's report has been
reformatted to supply government-wide statements in addition to fund financial statements for
individual major funds. Although the new format and reporting requirements make year-to-year
comparisons difficult in this first year of implementation, the new financial reporting model
supplies information not previously available, and will improve financial reporting and analysis
in future years. We have submitted this report to the Governmental Finance Officers Association
for the Certificate of Achievement A ward.
RECOMMENDA nON
Accept the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for 2002-2003.
Submitted by:
CJ4/{,~ a {1ftûð~
Carol A. Atwood
Director of Administrative Services
Qst
David W. Knapp
City Manager
Printed on Recycled Peper
3-1
"
CUPEIQ1NO
City Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino. CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3220
Fax: (408) 777-3366
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
SUMMARY
Agenda Item No. ~
Meeting Date: March I, 2004
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Approve the Annual Investment Policy
BACKGROUND
The California Government Code requires a statement of investment policy to be reviewed and
adopted by the City Council on an annual basis. This statement is intended to provide guidelines
for the prudent investment of the City's temporary idle cash, and outline the policies for
maximizing the efficiency of the City's cash management system. The ultimate goal is to
enhance the economic status of the City while protecting its pooled cash. The Cupertino Audit
Committee reviewed the policy during their regular meeting of February 18, 2004.
The investment policy is modified each year to incorporate any new legislative action
requirements for State and Local Government agencies. There were no legislative changes in
2003 that necessitated a change to the existing policy.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of the Investment Policy.
Submitted by:
Approved for submission:
~ Ô, ()~
Carol A. Atwood
Director of Administrative Services
~
David W. Knapp
City Manager
Pdnted on Recycled Paper
4-(
City of Cupertino
Investment Policy
March 1,2004
POLICY
Under authority granted by the City Council, the City Treasurer and Deputy Treasurer are
responsible for investing the surplus funds of the City.
The investment of the funds of the City of Cupertino is directed to the goals of safety, liquidity
and yield. The authority governing investments for municipal governments is set forth in the
California Government Code, Sections 53601 through 53659.
The primary objective of the investment policy of the City of Cupertino is SAFETY OF
PRINCIPAL. Investments shall be placed in those securities as outlined by type and maturity
sector in this document. Effective cash flow management and resulting cash investment
practices are recognized as essential to good fiscal management and control. The City's portfolio
shall be designed and managed in a manner responsive to the public trust and consistent with
state and local law. Portfolio management requires continual analysis and as a result the balance
between the various investments and maturities may change in order to give the City of
Cupertino the optimum combination of necessary liquidity and optimal yield based on cash flow
projections.
SCOPE
The investment policy applies to all financial assets of the City of Cupertino as accounted for in
the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Policy statements outlined in this
document focus on the City of Cupertino's pooled, surplus funds, but will also apply to all other
funds under the City Treasurer's span of control unless specifically exempted by statue or
ordinance. This policy is applicable, but not limited to all funds listed below:
.
General Fund
Special Revenue Funds
Capital Project Funds
Enterprise Funds
Internal Service Funds
Trust and Agency Funds
Any new fund unless specifically exempted
.
.
.
.
.
.
Investments of bond proceeds shall be governed by the provisions of the related bond indentures
and/or cash flow requirements and therefore may extend beyond the maturity limitations as
outlined in this document.
4-¿
City of Cupertino
Investment Policy
March 1,2004
PRUDENCE
The standard to be used by investment officials shall be that of a "prudent person" and shall be
applied in the context of managing all aspects of the overall portfolio. Investments shall be made
with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence,
direction and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation,
but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income
to be derived.
It is the City's full intent, at the time of purchase, to hold all investments until maturity to ensure
the return of all invested principal dollars. However, it is realized that market prices of securities
will vary depending on economic and interest rate conditions at any point in time. It is further
recognized that in a well-diversified investment portfolio, occasional measured losses are
inevitable due to economic, bond market or individual security credit analysis. These occasional
losses must be considered within the context of the overall investment program objectives and
the resultant long-tenD rate of return.
The City Treasurer and Deputy Treasurer, acting within the intent and scope of the investment
policy and other written procedures and exercising due diligence, shall be relieved of personal
responsibility and liability for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes,
provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely manner and appropriate action is
taken to control adverse developments.
OBJECTIVES
The primary objectives, in order of priority, of the City of Cupertino's investment activities shall
be:
A. Safetv of Principal
Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the City of Cupertino. Each investment
transaction shall seek to ensure that capital losses are avoided, whether from securities
default, broker-dealer default or erosion of market value. The City shall seek to preserve
principal by mitigating the two types of risk, credit risk and market risk.
Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of the issuer of a security, shall be
mitigated by investing in investment grade securities and by diversifying the investment
portfolio so that the failure of anyone issuer does not unduly harm the City's capital
base and cash flow.
2
4-J
City of Cupertino
Investment Policy
March 1,2004
Market risk, defined as market value fluctuations due to overall changes in the general
level of interest rates, shall be mitigated by limiting the average maturity of the City's
investment portfolio (see maximum maturities) and structuring the portfolio based on
historic and current cash flow analysis eliminating the need to sell securities prior to
maturity and avoiding the purchase of long tenD securities for the sole purpose of short
tenD speculation.
B. Liquiditv
The City's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating
requirements which might be reasonably anticipated and provide the City with adequate cash
flows to pay its obligations over the next six months. Additionally, the portfolio should
consist largely of securities with active secondary resale markets.
C. Yield
The City's investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a rate of
return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, commensurate with Cupertino's
investment risk constraints and cash flow characteristics of the portfolio.
MAXIMUM MATURITIES
Maturities of investments will be selected based on liquidity requirements to minimize interest
rate and maximize earnings. Investment of surplus funds shall comply with the maturity limits as
set forth in the California Government Code 53600, et seq. Where this section does not specify a
limitation on the tenD or remaining maturity at the time of the investment, no investment shall be
made in any security that at the time of the investment has a tenD remaining to maturity in excess
of five years, unless the Council has granted express authority to make that investment either
specifically or as a part of an investment program approved by the Council no less than three
months prior to the investment.
Reserve funds may be invested in securities exceeding five years if the maturity of such
investments is made to coincide as nearly as practicable with the expected use of the funds.
PERFORMANCE EV ALUA nON
Investment perfonnance is continually monitored and evaluated by the City Treasurer.
Investment perfonnance statistics and activity reports are generated on a monthly basis for
presentation to the oversight (audit) committee, City Manager and City Council.
3
~-L(
City of Cupertino
Investment Policy
March 1,2004
Yield on the City's investment portfolio is of secondary importance compared to the safety and
liquidity objectives described above. The City's investment portfolio shall be designed to attain
a market average rate of return through economic cycles. The market average rate of return is
defined as the average return on the Local Agency Investment Fund (assuming the State does not
adversely affect LAIF's returns due to budget constraints). Whenever possible, and consistent
with risk limitations as defined herein and prudent investment principles, the Treasurer shall seek
to augment return above the market average rate of return.
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY
The Treasurer is responsible for investment management decisions and activities per City
Council Resolution.
The Treasurer shall develop and maintain written administrative procedures for the operation of
the investment program, which are consistent with this investment policy. Procedures will
include reference to safekeeping, wire transfer agreements, collateral/deposit agreements,
banking service contacts, and other investment related activities.
The Treasurer shall designate a staff person as a liaison/deputy in the event circumstances require
timely action and the Treasurer is not present.
No officer or designee may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under tenns
of this policy and the procedures by the Treasurer and approved by the City Manager/Council.
The Treasurer shall be responsible for all transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of
controls to regulate the activities of subordinate officials.
OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
An audit committee consisting of appropriate internal and external members, appointed by the
City Council, shall be established to provide general oversight and direction concerning the
policy related to management of the City's investment pool. The City Treasurer shall serve in a
staff and advisory capacity. The committee shall meet at least quarterly to review policy
changes, new legislation and portfolio status.
ETHICS AND CONFUCTS OF INTEREST
Officers and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business
activity that conflicts with proper execution of the investment program, or impairs their ability to
make impartial investment decisions. Additionally the City Treasurer and the Deputy Treasurer
are required to annually file applicable financial disclosures as required by the Fair Political
Practices Commission (FPPC).
4
L(-5
City of Cupertino
Investment Policy
March 1,2004
SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES
To protect against fraud or embezzlement or losses caused by collapse of an individual securities
dealer, all securities owned by the City shall be held in safekeeping by a third party custodian
acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement. All trades executed by a
dealer will settle delivery versus payment (DVP) through the City's safekeeping agent.
Securities held in custody for the City shall be independently audited on an annual basis to verify
investment holdings.
All exceptions to this safekeeping policy must be approved by the City Treasurer in written form
and included in the monthly report to City Council.
INTERNAL CONTROL
Separation of duties between the Treasurer's function and Finance is designed to provide an
ongoing internal review to prevent the potential for converting assets or concealing transactions.
Existing procedures require all wire transfers initiated by the Treasury Section be reconfirmed by
the appropriate financial institution to non-treasury staff. Proper documentation obtained from
confirmation and cash disbursement wire transfers is required for each investment transaction.
Timely bank reconciliation is conducted to ensure proper handling of all transactions.
The investment portfolio and all related transactions are reviewed and balanced to appropriate
general ledger accounts by Finance on a monthly basis.
An independent analysis by an external auditor shall be conducted annually to review internal
control, account activity and compliance with policies and procedures.
REPORTING
The City Treasurer shall prepare a monthly investment report, including a succinct management
summary that provides a clear picture of the status of the current investment portfolio. The
report will be prepared in a manner that will report all information required under this policy and
the California Government Code. The Treasurer will submit the report to Council no later than
the second council meeting, or approximately 45 days following the end of the month covered by
the report.
5
4 -t
City of Cupertino
Investment Policy
March 1,2004
In addition, the City Treasurer shall submit a copy of the second and fourth quarter investment
reports to the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission within 60 days of the close
of that quarter. A copy of this investment policy will also be remitted with the second quarter
report.
OUAUBæDBROKER/DEALERS
Minimum eligibility criteria for dealerslbrokers include a minimum of $1 billion in assets and a
minimum of five years in business. The registration status of all dealers is checked with the
National Association of Securities Dealers.
Dealers are required to acknowledge the receipt and review of the Statement of Investment
Policy, to be familiar with the government code restrictions, and have experience with dealing
with other municipal investors. Dealers are then selected on the basis of yields, services offered,
and references obtained. They may be primary or secondary dealers. The financial institutions
must submit a current annual audited financial statement to ascertain capital adequacy.
COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS
Collateral is required for investments in certificates of deposit and repurchase agreements. In
order to reduce market risk, the collateral level will be at least 102% of market value of principal
and accrued interest.
In order to conform with the provisions of the Federal Bankruptcy Code which provides for
liquidation of securities held as collateral, the only securities acceptable as collateral shall be
certificates of deposit, commercial paper, eligible banker's acceptances, medium term notes or
securities that are the direct obligations of, or are fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by,
the United States or any agency of the United States.
AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
Investment of City funds is governed by the California Government Code Sections 53600 et seq.
Within the context of the limitations, the following investments are authorized, as further limited
herein:
1. United States Treasury Bills, Bonds, and Notes or those for which the full faith and
credit of the United States are pledged for payment of principal and interest. There is
no percentage limitation of the portfolio that can be invested in this category, although a
five-year maturity limitation is applicable.
6
t.{-7
City of Cupertino
Investment Policy
March 1,2004
2. Obligations issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), the
Federal Farm Credit System (FFCB), the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLB), the
Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), the Student Loan Marketing
Association (SLMA), and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association (FHLMC).
There is no percentage limitation of the portfolio that can be invested in this category.
A five-year maturity limitation is applicable with the exception of three FHLMC
investments approved by City Council and purchased in 1993 which mature in 2007
and 2008. Such investments have a maturity value of $6,260,000.
Investments detailed in items 3 through 10 are further restricted to percentage of the cost value of
the portfolio in anyone-issuer name to a maximum of 10%. The total value invested in anyone
issuer shall not exceed 5% of the issuers net worth. Again, a five-year maximum maturity
limitation is applicable unless further restricted by this policy.
3. Banker's Acceptances (bills of exchange or time drafts drawn on and accepted by
commercial banks) may not exceed 180 days to maturity or 40% of the cost value of the
portfolio.
4. Commercial paper ranked PI by Moody's Investor Services or Al+ by Standard &
Poors, and issued by domestic corporations having assets in excess of $500,000,000 and
having an AA or better rating on its long tenn debentures as provided by Moody's or
Standard & Poors. Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed 270 days to
maturity nor represent more than 10% of the outstanding paper of the issuing
corporation. Purchases of commercial paper may not exceed 25% of the cost value of
the portfolio.
5. Negotiable Certificates of Deposits issued by nationally or state chartered banks or state
or federal savings institutions. Purchases of Negotiable Certificates of Deposit may not
exceed 30% of the cost value of the portfolio. A maturity limitation of five years is
applicable.
6. Repurchase agreements that specify tenns and conditions may be transacted with banks
and broker dealers. The maturity of the repurchase agreements shall not exceed one
year. The market value of the securities used as collateral for the repurchase
agreements shall be monitored by the investment staff and shall not be allowed to fall
below 102% of the value of the repurchase agreement. A PSA Master Repurchase
Agreement is required between the City of Cupertino and the broker/dealer or financial
institution for all repurchase agreements transacted.
7. Reverse repurchase agreements are not authorized.
7
4-3'
City of Cupertino
Investment Policy
March 1,2004
8. Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), which is a State of California managed
investment pool, may be used up to the maximum permitted by California state law.
Investment officers will review LAIF's investment policy, investment mix, rate of
return, etc. on a monthly basis.
9. Certificates of Deposit (time deposits), non-negotiable and collateralized in accordance
with the California Government Code, may be purchased through banks or savings and
loan associations.
10. Medium Term Corporate Notes issued by corporations organized and operating in the
United States with a maximum maturity of five years may be purchased. Securities
eligible for investment shall be rated A or better by Moody's or Standard & Poor's
rating services. Purchase of medium term notes may not exceed 30% of the cost value
of the portfolio.
11. Bonds issued by the local agency, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues
from a revenue producing property owned, controlled or operated by the local agency or
by a department, board, agency, or authority of the local agency.
12. Registered state warrants or treasury notes or bonds of this state, including bonds
payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue producing property owned, controlled
or operated by the state or by a department, board, agency or authority of the state.
13. Bonds, notes, warrants or other evidences of indebtedness of any local agency within
this state.
14. Various daily money market funds administered for or by trustees, paying agents and
custodian banks contracted by the City of Cupertino may be purchased as allowed under
State of California Government Code. Only funds holding U.S. Treasury or
Government agency obligations can be utilized and may not exceed 20% of the cost
value of the portfolio.
15. Ineligible investments are those that are not described herein, including but not limited
to, common stocks and long term (over five years in maturity) notes and bonds are
prohibited from use in this portfolio. It is noted that special circumstances arise that
necessitate the purchase of securities beyond the five-year limitation. On such
occasions, requests must be approved by City Council prior to purchase.
8
c.{-7
City of Cupertino
Investment Policy
March 1,2004
DEPOSITS
To be eligible to receive local agency money, a bank, savings association, federal association, or
federally insured industrial loan company shall have received an overall rating of not less than
"satisfactory" in its most recent evaluation by the appropriate federal financial supervisorial
agency of its record of meeting the credit needs of California's communities.
INTEREST EARNINGS
All moneys earned and collected from investments authorized in this policy shall be allocated
monthly to various fund accounts based on the cash balance in each fund as a percentage of the
entire pooled portfolio.
POLICY REVIEW
The City of Cupertino's investment policy shall be adopted by resolution of the City Council on
an annual basis. This investment policy shall be reviewed at least annually to ensure its
consistency with the overall objectives of preservation of principal, liquidity and yield, and its
relevance to current law and financial and economic trends.
9
4~rD
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
FAX (408) 777-3333
Community Development Department
SUMMARY
AGENDA NO.~
AGENDA DATE March 1. 2004
SUMMARY: APPEAL of Planning Commission Approval of file nos. U-2003-13, ASA-
2003-09, and EA-2003-18, to allow the operation of a daycare facility in an existing
building with a maximum occupancy of 148 children and 21 employees at 1515 S. De
Anza Blvd.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council can take any of the following actions, acting on each of the appeals
individually.
For the applicant (Kindercare) appeal:
1) Deny the appeal, upholding the Planning Commission decisions, or
2) Approve the appeal, and make any appropriate changes to the Commission
approvals.
For the Jamestown Drive neighbors' appeal:
1) Deny the appeal, upholding the Planning Commission decision, or
2) Approve the appeal, which would require the preparation of a noise report
(one has already been prepared), and make any appropriate changes to the
Commission approvals.
BACKGROUND:
On January 12, 2004, the Planning Commission approved these applications, which
would allow KinderCare Learning Centers to modify and occupy a partially vacant
building for the purpose of operating a day care center for young children. The
approval was subsequently appealed by:
1) ten neighbors living on Jamestown Drive to the rear of the project. The basis
of their appeal was the lack of a noise study assessing the noise levels of the
playgrounds on the residential properties (Exhibit B).
2) the applicant, because of perceived financial and timing hardships the public
improvements and parking conditions would place on the project (Exhibit C).
Printed on Recycled Paper
5-(
Appeal oW-2003-13, ASA-2003-09, EA-2003-l8
Page 2
March I, 2004
DISCUSSION:
Staff has already met with the applicant! appellant, Lisa Brooke, and resolved her
concerns with the project conditions of approval. She is satisfied with the conditions of
approval, which are the basis of her appeal, as noted in her letter to staff ( Exhibit D).
Noise Staff, the applicant and her noise consultant held a neighborhood meeting on
February 5th with the Jamestown Drive residents to hear and address their concerns.
Note that during the staff and public review process for this project, a noise study was
not required to analyze the noise impact of the daycare center on residential neighbors
for numerous reasons:
. Historically, city decision makers have not considered the sounds of children at
play to be an adverse environmental impact, which would require
environmental analysis;
. Young children (5 years and younger) that would be cared for at the facility,
make less noise than older children;
. The proposed children's playground is over 160 feet away from nearest
residential property line; and
. There were more onerous nearby noise sources: traffic noise from De Anza
Boulevard and the outdoor storage yard for Minton's Lumber.
At the neighborhood meeting, it became apparent that the residents believed the
playgrounds were located next to the residential property line, which is not the case.
The playgrounds are over 160 feet away and separated from the residences by an
existing parking lot owned by the adjacent office building. This seem to alleviate
resident concerns about noise; however, the applicant volunteered to produce a noise
report (Exhibit E).
The noise study concludes that child-at-play noise would generate no more than 50 to
52 dBA at the residential property line to the west. The City's community noise
ordinance establishes a daytime maximum noise level of 65dBA-far above the project
noise level.
Cut- Throu~h Traffic At the neighborhood meeting, residents raised another issue
about potential cut-through traffic on their street. The concern was about Kindercare
traffic that intended to go northbound on De Anza Boulevard after leaving the facility.
The concern was that this traffic would cut-through the neighborhood because it is too
difficult to make a V-turn on De Anza Boulevard. The previously-prepared KinderCare
traffic report did not specifically address this concern. The Council could add the
following draft condition to the use permit to address this issue.
2
5-L
Appeal ofU-2003-13, ASA-2003-09, EA-2003-18
Page 3
March 1,2004
Condition #33 (draft)
33. POTENTIAL CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC
The applicant shall notify all customers and employees to respect the adjacent
residential neighborhood by not driving through local residential streets. If cut-
through traffic becomes a problem on adjacent residential streets, the Public Works
Department shall evaluate the traffic and implement mitigation measures consistent
with General Plan Transportation Policy No. 4-6 (Neighborhood Traffic Management).
Enclosures:
Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 6229, 6230
Exhibit A: Planning Commission staff report dated 1/12/04.
Exhibit B: Appeal Form from Calvin Machida, John coP. Huang, resident of
1590 Jamestown Dr., Debbi & Charles Schramm, Vinh Dao, Wanda Birkley, Viola
Clute, Sal & Ruth Algeri (all Jamestown Drive residents)
Exhibit C: Appeal from Lisa Brooke, representing KinderCare
Exhibit D: Letter from Lisa Brooke dated 2/24/04.
Exhibit E: KinderCare Learning Centers Property Line Noise Study prepared by
Charles M. Salter Associates Inc. and dated 2/9/04.
Prepared by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner
APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL:
SUBMITTED BY:
~J'~~A/~
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
QJL
David W. Knapp
City Manager
g:planningj pdreport/ ccjU-2003-13appeal
3
)-J
U-2003-13
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6229
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF 1HE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A DA YCARE
F AClLITY IN AN EXISTING BUILDING WITH A MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY OF 148
CHILDREN AND 21 EMPLOYEES.
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
U-2003-13, ASA-2003-09, EA-2003-18
Kindercare Learning Centers, Inc.
1515 S. De Anza Boulevard
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application
for a Use Permit, as described in Section I of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the
Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held
one or more public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and has satisfied the following requirements:
1. The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, general welfare, or convenience;
2. The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the
Cupertino General Plan and the purpose of this title.
NOWr 1HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, application no. U-2003-I3 is hereby recommended for
approval; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning
5~Y
Resolution No. 6229
Page 2
U-2003-13
January 12, 2004
Application U-20O3-13, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting
of January 12, 2004, and are incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on the plan set entitled "Kindercare Learning Centers #1806 and
dated January 8, 2004.
2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Approval is granted to operate a daycare facility with a maximum occupancy of 148
children and 21 employees. The use shall operate between 7 AM to 9PM from
Monday through Friday, except for enrollment periods, which may operate during
weekends. Said use shall be reviewed within the first year of operation in the event
of noise related complaints. The Planning Commission may require a noise study
and mitigations including building an acoustic wall at the west property line and/ or
limiting the number of children allowed in the outside play yard.
3. BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE
In accordance with the applicant's letter of December 30, 2003, a structural analysis
will be performed at the time of construction document preparation and all
construction drawings for the project will be prepared in accordance with 2001
California Building Code and applicable amendments adopted by the City of
Cupertino. Based on the structural deficiencies found in the structural analysis, the
structure will need to be retrofitted to the structural requirements of the 2001
California Building Code and applicable amendments adopted by the City of
Cupertino. The final design shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of
Community Development and the Building Official.
4. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
The entry feature shall be redesigned to reflect Alternative A recommended by the
consultant architect, Larry Cannon, on December 17, 2003.
5. FENCING
All proposed exterior fencing shall be tubular steel (color: black). The design shall
be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to
issuance of building permits.
6. S. DE ANZA BOULEVARD FRONTAGE
a. The sidewalk shall be redesigned to be compatible with the S. Saratoga
Sunnyvale Conceptual Plan. The sidewalk shall not be moved out to the curb at
the ends. The final design of the sidewalk shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits.
5-J
Resolution No. 6229
Page 3
U-2003-13
January 12, 2004
b. At least five new 36" box trees shall be provided along S. De Anza Boulevard to
create a double row of trees. The final location of the trees shall be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of
building permits.
7. RECIPROCAL INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT
The applicant shall record a deed restriction for necessary reciprocal ingress and egress
easements between adjacent properties to the south, north and west, to be implemented
at such time that the City can require the same of adjacent property owners, subject to
approval of the City Attorney. The easement shall be recorded prior to issuance of
building occupancy.
8. CURB CUT CONSOLIDATION
The applicant shall record a deed restriction for consolidation of the curbcut between
the adjacent properties to the north, to be implemented at such time that the City can
require the same of the adjacent property owner, subject to approval of the City
Attorney. The easement shall be recorded prior to issuance of building occupancy.
9. BICYCLE PARKING
Bicycle spaces at the rate of 5% of the total automobile parking spaces shall be
provided located adjacent to the front parking lot. The final location shall be
reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to
issuance of a building permit.
10. PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
A parking management plan shall be prepared by the applicant that describes the
parking system used by employees, residents and visitors and shall be subject to
staff approval prior to final occupancy. At least 16 spaces (including all spaces
adjacent to the building) shall be reserved for drop-off and pick-up.
11. FUTURE PARKING PROBLEMS
In the event of future parking problems, the Planning Commission reserves the right
to recall this use permit at any time and the applicant hereby agrees to implement
any or all of the following measures or other measures as deemed necessary to
mitigate said problem:
a. Organize an employee car pooling/van pooling program;
b. Limit future capacity based on parking demand during impacted periods;
c. Implement a system to increase efficiency of drop-off and pick-up, especially
during peak hours.
12. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN
A construction management plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved
by staff prior to issuance of building permits.
s--~
Resolution No. 6229
Page 4
U-2003-13
/
January 12r 2004
13. LANDSCAPING
a. Arborist's recommendations - The recommendations in the report by Barrie D.
Coate and Associates dated December 15, 2003 shall be followed, except that the
four flowering cherry trees in the front of the building shall be retained.
b. Tree Protection Bond - A bond in the amount of $5000 shall be provided to ensure
that existing trees, including the redwood trees along the western property line,
are not impacted by construction.
c. Protection plan - As part of the building permit drawings, a tree protection plan
shall be prepared by a landscape architect or certified arborist for the existing
trees to be retained. The tree protection shall be inspected and approved by the
arborist prior to beginning construction.
d. Planting along fencing - The fencing on the north and south sides of the play area
shall be planted with shrubs and vines.
14. TRANSFORMER
The transformer in the front landscaping along De Anza Boulevard shall be
undergrounded. A bond in the amount required for the undergrounding (to be
determined by the Director of Community Development and the Director of Public
Works) shall be provided in case the work is not completed prior to occupancy.
15. UTILITY BOXES AND EQUIPMENT
Any equipment that is not located underground shall be screened by fencing and
landscaping. Other equipment adjacent to the building or on the roof shall be
screened. Locations for said equipment and proposed screening shall be approved
by Planning staff prior to issuance of building permits.
16. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice
of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications,
reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day
approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and
other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you
fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements
of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
<Ç;- '7
Resolution No. 6229
Page 5
U-2003-13
January 12, 2004
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
17. STREET WIDENING
Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance
with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
18. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance
with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
19. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION
Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer.
Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of
visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the
maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located.
20. TRAFFIC SIGNS
Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City.
21. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with
Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. Please contact Army Corp of
Engineers and/ or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate.
22. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre and Post-
development calculations must be provided to identify if storm drain facilities need
to be constructed or renovated.
23. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities
Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of
Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of
underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing
utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the
affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
24. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of
Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and
inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for undergrounding
of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction
permits.
~-r
Resolution No. 6229
Page 6
U-2003-13
January 12, 2004
Fees:
a. Checking & Inspection Fees $ 6% of On-Site and Off-Site
Improvement Costs (As determined by a Registered Civil Engineer)
b. Storm Drainage Fee: $ 2,077.22
c. Development Maintenance Deposit $ 1,000.00
d. Street Tree By Developer
Bonds:
a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements
b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement
The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule
adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified
at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the
event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then
current fee schedule.
25. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment
enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground
such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas.
26. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES
The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed
to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water
service to the subject development.
27. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources
Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP shall be included
in your grading and street improvement plans.
28. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The developer shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City to maintain
the landscaping within the City's right of way along De Anza Boulevard.
29. SIDEWALK EASEMENT
The developer shall provide the City an easement for the portion of new concrete
sidewalk, which connects both segments of the City's sidewalk. A Registered Civil
Engineer shall complete a plat and description of the area to the Public Works
Department.
30. TRASH ENCLOSURES
The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental
Programs Department. Clearance by the Public Works Department is needed prior
5'-1
Resolution No. 6229
Page 7
U-2003-13
January 12r 2004
to obtaining a building permit.
31. TRAFFIC
a. Install a RIO (One Way) sign in the median across from the north driveway's
current exit.
b. To reduce potential ingress/ egress conflicts, reconfigure the northern portion of
the north driveway entry and change the northern driveway to ingress only.
c. Install painted arrows at driveways: ingress-straight, egress-right turn.
32. U-TURN MOVEMENTS
The Public Works Department shall review the necessity of limiting traffic
movements from the site to the U-turn pocket opposite the south driveway on S. De
Anza Boulevard and may require the applicant to install a raised physical barrier
(curb or rumble bars) and appropriate signage to prevent this movement. Said
mitigations shall be paid for by the applicant and may be required up to one year
from the operation of the daycare.
CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF
ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS
(Section 66474.18 of the California Government Code)
I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV.
Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices
I sl Ralph Qualls
Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works
City Engineer CA License 22046
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
Chen
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Miller, Vice-Chair Saadati, Wong and Chairperson
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
I s I Steve Piasecki
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
O:\Planning\PDREPORT\RES\ U-2003-13 res. doc
Isl Angela Chen
Angela Chen, Chairperson
Cupertino Planning Commission
5-10
ASA-2003-09
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6230
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AN
ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE REVIEW OF FOR CHANGES TO THE BUILDING
EXTERIOR AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE KINDERCARE DAYCARE FACILITY
AT 1515 SOUTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD.
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
U-2003-13, ASA-2003-09, EA-2003-18
Kindercare Learning Centers, Inc.
1515 S. De Anza Boulevard
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more
public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application;
and has satisfied the following requirements:
1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property
or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, general welfare, or convenience;
2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan, and
zoning ordinance;
3. The proposal will use materials and design elements that compliment the existing and
neighboring structures;
4. The proposal includes landscaping and a pedestrian-oriented streetscape that will
soften the appearance of the structure.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the design review application is hereby approved subject to the
conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on page 2 thereof; and
ç-(f
Resolution No. 6230
Page 2
ASA-ZO03-09
January 12, zO04
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution
are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application ASA-2003-09
set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of January 12, 2004, and are
incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III. CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED PROTECT
Approval is based on the plan set entitled "Kindercare Learning Centers #1806 and dated
January 8, 2004.
2. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
The entry feature shall be redesigned to reflect Alternative A recommended by the
consultant architect, Larry Cannon, on December 17, 2003.
3. FENCING
All proposed exterior fencing shall be tubular steel (color: black). The design shall be
reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of
building permits.
4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government
Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the
amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other
exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you
may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to
Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-
day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
c; -( 2-
Resolution No. 6230
Page 3
ASA-2003-09
January 12, 2004
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: Miller, Vice-Chair Saadati, Wong and Chairperson Chen
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
I sl Steve Piasecki
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Isl Angela Chen
Angela Chen, Chairperson
Cupertino Planning Commission
J:\Planning\PDREPORT\RES\ASA-2003-09 res.doc
,)-{3
EXHIBIT:
A
CITY OF CUPERT1NO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM
Application: U-2003-13, ASA-2003-09, EA-2003-18
Applicant: Kindercare Learning Centers, Inc.
Owner: Teglia Family Trust
Location: 1515 S. De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino
Agenda Date: January 12, 2003
Application Summary:
USE PERMIT to allow a childcare facility in an existing retail building.
ARCHITECTURAL SITE APPROVAL for changes to the building exterior and site
improvements.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve:
1. The Negative Declaration, file number EA-2003-18;
2. The Use Permit application, file number U-2003-13, in accordance with the model
resolution.
3. The Architectural and Site Approval application, file number ASA-2003-09 in
accordance with the model resolution.
Project Data:
General Plan Designation: Commercial/Residential
Zoning Designation: P(Comm,Res 5-15) or Planned Commercial and
Residential 5-15 units/ acre
Acreage: 0.86 acres
Stories: 1 story (existing)
Maximum Occupancy: 148 children and 21 employees
Parking Required: 22 spaces
Parking Supplied: 28 spaces
Project Consistency with: General Plan: Yes
Zoning: Yes
Environmental Assessment: Negative Declaration recommended.
DISCUSSION
The applicant is proposing to replace a vacant 9,880 square foot building (previously
occupied by Galaxy Lighting) with a daycare facility with a maximum occupancy of 148
children and 21 employees. The project site currently consists has a parking lot to the
front as well as one to the rear of the building. The project proposes to remove the rear
parking lot and driveway and replace it with a play area. The front parking lot with 28
spaces will be retained.
5-IY
Applications: U-2003-13, E,.-1003-18
Kindercare
January 12, 2004
Page 2
Zoning
The project site is zoned P(Comm, Res 5-15) or Planned Commercial and Residential (5-
15 units/ acre), which allows daycare uses. Therefore, the proposed use is consistent
with the zoning.
Design
The project proposes an entry feature to the existing building to enhance the entrance.
No other architectural changes are proposed. The project was reviewed by Larry
Cannon, the City's architectural consultant, who recommended changes to the design of
the entry feature (Exhibit A). The recommendation has been added to the conditions of
approval for the project. Staff recommends approval of the proposed design with the
changes recommended by the consultant architect.
Traffic Impacts
A traffic and parking analysis was prepared by Hexagon Transportation Consultants on
December 2, 2003 (Exhibit B). The proposed project is expected to generate a net of 388
daily trips (over the previous commercial use) with 122 AM peak hour trips and 99 PM
peak hour trips. The proposed project will not result in a level of service below LOS D
at the analyzed intersections, which is within the minimum acceptable operating level
of service for intersections in Cupertino. Additionally, the proposed project will not
cause a significant impact at any of the City or CMP-monitored (Santa Oara County
Congestion Management Program) intersections under the City's Transportation
Impact Analysis and/ or the County CMP Transportation Impact Analysis guidelines.
Parking
The maximum occupancy of the building will be 148 children and 21 employees. The
project proposes a total of 28 parking spaces. Cupertino does not have a parking
requirement for daycare facilities in the parking code. Therefore, a parking analysis
was conducted (see ExhibitB) to estimate demand (the analysis assumed a maximum
capacity of160 students and 22 employees, which has since been reduced to 148 students and 21
employees). The analysis included the following:
. A parking study, which calculated the number of occupied spaces at four daycare
centers ranging in size from 150 to 184 students. The maximum number of occupied
parking spaces indicated an average peak of one space for every eight students
(parking for employees is taken into account indirectly since the number of
employees is based on number of children). If the ratio were applied to the
maximum occupancy for the proposed facility, the requirement would be 19 spaces.
. A survey of parking codes for some cities in Santa Clara County. The ratio for San
Jose is one space for every ten students, which would yield a parking requirement of
16 spaces for the proposed facility. The ratio in Milpitas and Palo Alto is one space
per 1.5 employees. This ratio would yield a requirement of 22 spaces for the
r;-{,)
Applications: U-2003-13, £¡-,-1003-18
Kindercare
January 12, 2004
Page 3
proposed development. The ratio in Sunnyvale was the highest at one space per
employee plus one space per 14 students. This ratio would yield a requirement of 33
spaces for the proposed development.
Based on the research described above, the analysis recommends a parking requirement
of one space per employee or 22 spaces (parking for drop-off for children is taken into
account indirectly since the number of employees is based on number of children).
Staff conducted a survey of parking provided at similar daycare facilities, including the
Happy Days on Saich Drive, which was approved in 1999 (see table below). The
average parking ratio provided was one space for every 6.5 children (parking for
employees was taken into account indirectly since the number of employees is based on
number of children). The project proposes a ratio of one space for every 5.3 children,
which is greater than the average.
COMPARISON OF PARKING PROVIDED
AT SIMILAR DAYCARE FACILITIES
DAYCARE PARKING RATIO
1/6.3 children
1/4.7 children
1/7.3 children
1/6.5 children
1/6.8 children
1/7.3 children
1/6.5 children
.3 children
Staff also conducted a survey of parking at the Happy Days facility on Wednesday,
January 7, 2004 between 4:30PM and 5:30PM to determine whether parking provided
was adequate. Happy Days provides parking at the ratio of one per 6.3 children
(employee parking taken into account indirectly). Parking lot occupancy during that
period did not exceed 70%.
The applicant has also provided information on the number of children and employees
expected per shift based on information from their operating daycares (Exhibit q.
According to the information, no more than 127 children and 11 teachers are expected
to be present at anyone shift. Therefore the actual parking demand is expected to be
lower than indicated in the analysis.
Based on the above analysis and information, staff believes that the proposed 28 spaces
will be adequate. A parking plan is required per the conditions of approval to ensure
that at least 16 spaces, including all spaces adjacent to the building, are reserved for
)-fh
Applications: U-20O3-13, &..-1003-18
Kindercare
January 12, 2004
Page 4
drop-off and pick-up. A condition of approval requires a review of the use permit and
additional mitigations in case of parking issues in the future.
Noise
The proposed children's play area is to the rear or west of the project site. The project is
flanked by a parking lot of an adjacent office building to the south and west and by
concrete block waIl on the Minton's Lumber property to the north. Single-family
residential uses to the west are buffered from the project site by the parking lot.
Therefore, the noise frorn the project is not expected to have a negative impact on
adjacent uses. Since a portion of the proposed playground is adjacent to the
lumberyard, an acoustic analysis was requested to determine noise impacts to
occupants of the project site, especially children in the outdoor play area. A copy of the
acoustic analysis will be available at the meeting. The conditions of approval will be
amended to address any impacts outlined in the report.
Landscaping
The project proposes to enclose the play area to the rear of the building with a six-foot
high wrought iron fence. A portion of the fence will be constructed adjacent to a row of
existing redwood trees along the western property line and trees along the southern
property line. The impact to the existing trees was reviewed by the City's consultant
arborist, Barrie Coates (see Exhibit D). The report makes recommendations relating to
construction and irrigation in the vicinity of the existing trees. The recommendations
have been included in the conditions of approval for the project.
Fiscal Impacts
The project would convert a previous retail use, which provided sales tax revenue, into
a daycare facility, which would not be subject to a sales tax. Therefore, it is expected
that the proposed project will result in a loss of revenue from sales tax of about $18,750
per year (using an average sales tax per square foot based on the City's revenues for
fiscal year 2002-2003). The proposed childcare facility would provide an important
service to the community. Therefore, even with the potential loss of revenue, staff
supports the proposed use at this location.
Submitted by: Aarti Shrivastava, Senior Planner F .
Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developmen~
ENCLOSURES
Model Resolution for U-2003-13
Model Resolution for ASA-2003-09
<)-(7
Applications: U-2003-13, Eh.-LO03-18
Kindercare
January 12, 2004
Page 5
Initial Study
ERC Recommendation
Negative Declaration
Plan Set
Exhibit A: Design Review by Larry Cannon, December 17, 2003.
Exhibit B: Traffic Study by Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc., Dec. 2,2003.
Exhibit C: Estimated children and employees per shift, Kindercare Centers.
Exhibit D: Arborist report by Barrie Coates, December 15, 2003.
J: \ Planning \ PDREPORT\pcUsereports \ U-2003-13.doc
s- -( r
EXHIBIT:
B
\õ)IH1En1E~
[ì18~
CUPERTINO CITY CLERK
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
'(408) 777-3223
APPEAL
/)-ZU;-8/ iffl1-?ù:J:;?"â?-EA- 2¿-oJ;--/¡)
Le,S'c.tl/ët!:,h,E/¿,s;.II+I?¡?:I(.JJ tlic/'.'.f¡I¿uf¿-. -I J/!.
, 17'9 " 9~.Ác~!
Appellant(s): /1198 S,:..",¡;múJÁ.J ô;¿ I /1i'3t'.JA.m,q1r;WÆI p,,- "I 77, ?~¡: ~
name, address, 'I ;t 6 .-t:'~<f" ;;Z,Ç3 ?" ~ 2-
phone number t.J.;...L."\?",~vk} ,/'1/,-/(,39 1<;"10 '3c¡Jftf'f+CWYl::>-~OII¿¡
""~b't).' ...do..t~\e.s ~""""",v"-- ¡J./r; 7 Sìan......~ P"l
~ l '-\ -:r o..\N\tS ~ "- ~)Ý' J6 n ~ . é:', r¡>: /-kLc.... :2- . - ¿ ~ 6 2- ( ~- ~ Jí1 tMJ/.ç¡ LOVVVl 'Y,...,
c..""'t'er~,c.¡II.- <1SO &~vjA/ I Aci{¡)4 ';¿~7-o72'f is"2-).. '];"""57ë""",'þ-r.
4. Decision of Director of Community Development VW-. t... Dec.= 25761'(4-( I \-/0 1ë;u.....~
viJecision of Planning Commission 0,
(please check one)
1.
Application No.
2.
Applicant(s):
3.
5.
Date of detennination of Director or mailing of notice of City decision: ,
6.
appools/appek fom11.doc ,
d - .?-..,c.+r-'&'-'-'~ --r--kEN
Á/A./ Õ-J¿'-~,¡..2.","1'/ ")' 77tØ" It i/l/t'd:£ ST(.ld:/ C/!-.-vbF'-.'
i/¡<../z~;f-T2.¿ 71 c¿>c,"",,7/t1'" >.- - f...-v T<,Ji!', JJ.:zof_vF:ë:I'r,J:'
/ f, 1¿Jð"/ 1-" ;<¿¿;C",]hl' o'h/.c
4ItJ¿? 5 rrlSe L, Ill, ".' dS,'. flY'Îrt CJ.IfÆ.JI
{'Pr,v.so,,¿, "'-,vc/ fii/t' BI'-", ò.e,Í . A2d Cvp~-¿7;.A.)O
. . /. ~ N' ST=LL.""f
kr,.,JdeJl.L/I-"",d L. .,c.-rT,."'" C):J~...
')-/7
U"'~v"UU~ .,..u
1. Applicaùon No,
2. AppliclI.llt(5):
3. AppeUnn.t(Ð):
Harpe, address,
phone n11mher
EXHIBIT:
c
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3223
APPEAL
I J - ;¡ m~-13
kìnrl-l'r('lJ(¡:> i...QPrfì;~ rov¡kr~. 111('_.
KJ.n&Þff'ilfl' IJJI1 N1/~1 Cp ~ IlY- .
loB> kJF: I-h-¡l¡;¡¡j~ ~+- ¡ ~1J)Je ILl-DO
p~ I of-... ... Q1?,¿)d, fJO.'1-R12- IlfJ'1
4. DecisioD of Director ofCol11JIDluity Development
vDccision ofP1anning Commission'
(please check one)
5.
Date of determination of Director or mailing of notice of City decision:
,lnnfllLNj 'Lt. 2.004-
Basis of appeal:
6.
~a?L See ~.
. KU1d.u~ J "'fV1;"" CLn+ers, /M...
Signahlre(s) " ~. "'-:J .
~ lAD ~ælu., (I,VlnfnJÆ:Jun rrlonf1(fJ
. Plc<!.se <:Ofnplotc fQ~-m, include appeal feQ of $ \4 fi >U1d return to the a.ttent10n of th...
City Clerk
opp<a¡'¡.pp,k rorml.doo
ç~ 2{)
KinderCare Learning Centers, Inc.
Application No. U-2003-13
Resolution No. 6229
Basis for Appeal:
Section III: Conditions Administered bv the Community Development Department
1. Approved Exhibits: KinderCare does not accept the approved exhibits because it
contains items represented as conditions below to which KinderCare does not
agree.
2. Development Approval: KinderCare objects to the condition limiting to 21
employees based upon the business regulation by the State of California
Community Care Licensing Division. Should this state agency change required
ratios for a specific age group then the required number of employees would
increase or decrease accordingly. Additionally, KinderCare would entertain a
proposal to comply with the noise standard outlined in the City of Cupertino
Municipal Code but feel this condition is too open ended to currently accept.
3. Building Code Compliance: KinderCare accepts this condition.
4. Architectural Design: KinderCare accepts this condition.
5. Fencing: KinderCare accepts this condition.
6. S. De Anza Boulevard Frontage:
a. KinderCare does not accept this condition because the sidewalk design
should align with the street frontage design for the adjacent office
development to the south. This sidewalk restriction requiring the stepping
back of the sidewalk provides an awkward transition across the driveway
since the sidewalks do not align.
b. KinderCare accepts this condition.
7. Reciprocal Ingress / Egress Easement: KinderCare has requested a copy of a
sample Reciprocal Ingress / Egress easement several times from the City of
Cupertino and to this date it has not been received. KinderCare cannot accept this
condition unless a sample document is provided for review. KinderCare is
willing to enter this agreement but will not guarantee the willingness of the
adjacent property owner to do the same.
8. Curb Cut Consolidation Easement: KinderCare has requested a copy of a sample
Curb Cut Consolidated Easement several times from the City of Cupertino and to
this date it has not been received. KinderCare cannot accept this condition until a
sample document is provided for review. At this time KinderCare will determine
if this condition is acceptable.
)~J,\
Page 2
KinderCare Learriing Centers, Inc.
Application No. U-2003-13
Resolution No. 6229
Basis for Appeal Continued:
9. Bicvc1e Parking: KinderCare accepts this condition.
10. Parking Management Plan: KinderCare accepts this condition.
11. Future Parking Problems: KinderCare objects to this condition based upon the
undue fmancial hardship this would place upon the feasibility of the project
should the use permit be recalled. Regardless of the measures requested of
KinderCare any limit to the capacity of the center or total recall of the use permit
would cause a financial hardship.
12. Construction Management Plan: KinderCare has requested a copy of a sample
Construction Management Plan from the City of Cupertino and to this date it has
not been received. KinderCare cannot accept this condition unless a sample
document is provided for review.
13. Landscaping: KinderCare accepts conditions a-d.
14. Transfonner: KinderCare objects to this condition due to the undue financial
hardship and time constraints it would place on the project. Additionally, it is
contradictory to the Public Works Condition No. 25.
15. Uti1itv Boxes and Equipment: KinderCare accepts this condition.
16. Notice of Fees. Dedications. Reservations or other Exactions: KinderCare accepts
this condition.
Section IV: Conditions Administered bv the Public Works Department
17. Street Widening: KinderCare objects to this condition due to the undue financial
hardship and time constraints it would place on the project. KinderCare objects
to the open ended condition as there is no way to anticipate future cost, which
would adversely impact the feasibility of this project.
18. Curb and Gutter Improvements: KinderCare objects to this condition due to the
undue financial hardship and time constraints it would place on the project.
KinderCare objects to the open ended condition as there is no way to anticipate
future cost, which would adversely impact the feasibility of this project.
5- :L~
Page 3
KinderCare Learning Centers, Inc.
Application No. U-2003-13
Resolution No. 6229
Basis for Appeal Continued:
19. Street Lighting Installation: KinderCare objects to this condition due to theundue
financial hardship and time constraints it would place on the project. KinderCare
objects to the open ended condition as there is no way to anticipate future cost,
which would adversely impact the feasibility of this project.
20. Traffic Signs: KinderCare accepts this condition.
21. Grading: KinderCare accepts this condition.
22. Drainage: KinderCare accepts this condition.
23. Underground Utilities: KinderCare objects to this condition due to the undue
financial hardship and time constraints it would place on the project. KinderCare
objects to the open ended condition as there is no way to anticipate future cost,
which would adversely impact the feasibility of this project.
24. Improvement Agreement: Kindercare accepts this condition.
25. Transformers: KinderCare Accepts this condition.
26. Dedication of Waterlines: KinderCare Accepts this condition.
27. Best Management Practices: KinderCare accepts this condition.
28. Maintenance Agreement: KinderCare accepts this condition.
29. Sidewalk Easement: KinderCare accepts this condition.
30. Trash Enclosures: KinderCare accepts this condition.
31. Traffic: KinderCare accepts this condition.
32. U-Turn Movements: KinderCare accepts this condition.
S--l:;
DEVELOF'I"IENT
cax:')Uj>jlil441
reo L4 LUU4
D",~~
r. ,~"
EXHIBIT:
D
~
KlnderCare"
Lisa D. Brooke
Construction Manager
(503) 872-1419
February 24, 2004
Mr. Colin Jung
Senior Planner
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Re:
Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of Application
V-2003-13, ASA -2003-09, EA-2003-18
KinderCare Learning Centers #1806
Dear Mr. lung:
Thank you for taking the time to review the conditions of approval for the proposed KinderCare Learning
Center located at 1515 South De Anz.a Blvd. Based upon the review with you and Jason Chou of Public
Work. KinderCare is satisfied with the conditions administered by the Community Development
Department and the Public Works Department in Resolution No. 6229.
KinderCare looks forward to being heard at the March I, 2003 City Council Meeting.
Respectfully,
X ~ )J ¿wI~
Lisa D. Brooke
Construction Manager
Cc:
File
Joe Keough - KinderCare
William Teglia, Jr.
Kind.,(;.or. Learning (;.ont...
650 NE Holladay Street Suite t 400 Portland. O'egoo 97232 . PO 80x 6760 Portland, O<egon 97228 . 503.872. 1300
5-;¡l:(
Coo,"II.," 10
-AOM!I",
AudloM",,'
S>,,'em De"go
.,d Telecommuolcatlo",
130Sutle,St'eet
Sac F,"ocl,co
Callfomlag4104
Tel 4153970442
FadT5397 0454
loto@cm'alle'oom
www.cm,elte,oom
Chehe, MSolte', PE
Da'" R S,h"cd, FAES
Ac~o",PN"h PE
Ew 00=1&
Tho~' A Sd"cdl&, PE
Kecce1hW G"~c, PE
E,', L B,=dh~" PE
JoimC '"yteg, PE
Mid". D Toy, PE
Tho~,JC""'e"
Do,," R a","II, Ph.D
Ro"AJe,,~1
PhllipNSo"&,
J""RDoly
C','",LMI>,,'
Robert P Alw"do
Jo,y G D'A",oo
MeAMalo~
B,"caN"ed
a"cdaRY.e
EhcA y~
T"yGlmbe'
P,,"eog"
TI~1hyC""L"c
Jœho,MRop"
Ko"cMP~1I
Ch'"Oaph" A Pol""
R""Waldo'"
JoffCI"key
A"""Stecley
Pol" Hd,!
Eth" Salle,
EiaiceY HOeh
C"odieK"e",
Je""eJ,,,,'
Rebe=Cm"",
K,,'cF~o
a""Oood
laoG"'.c
Ma~DNc""'"
C"diœHoey
M
Salter
Associ
E
9 February 2004
Lisa Brooke
KinderCare Learning Centers, Inc.
Via email: IbrookeúV.mai1.kindercare.com
Via email: dadamsúV.mai1.kindercare.com
Subject:
KinderCare Learning Centers, Inc. - Property Line Noise Study
CSA Project No. 03-0503
Dear Ms. Brooke:
We have completed our study of the proposed Cupertino KinderCare site. Our study
focused on potential child-at-play noise impact at the nearby residential property line to the
west. Our report follows:
ACOUSTICAL CRITERIA
The local applicable criterion for this condition is found in the City of Cupertino Municipal
Code.
Chapter 10 of this code contains the following information in Section 10.48.040 Daytime
(and Nighttime) Maximum Noise Levels:
Individual noise sources, or the combination ofa group of noise
sources located on the same property, shall not produce a noise level
exceeding those specified on property zoned as follows, unless
specifically provided in another section of this chapter:
Maximum Noise Level at
Land Use at Point of Complaint Site of
Origin Receiving Property,
Davtime
Non-Residential 65 dBA
5> 7-)'
ASSUMPTIONS
We understand that there will be approximately 150 kids enrolled at this KinderCare
facility, and that at any onetime a maximum of 75 children will be outside playing in the
outdoor play areas. We also understand that the enrollment is divided into three age
categories: infant (0-2 years), toddler (3 years), and older (4-5 years). We also understand
the school hours of operation all fall within the "daytime" designation in the Code, which
is derIDed as between the hours of7 am and 8 pm. Also, the distance between the
KinderCare property line adjacent the rear play area and the western residential property
line is 166 feet.
ANALYSIS DESCRIPTION
We have calculated the anticipated noise levels at the residential property line to the west
due to noise associated with children playing in the yard. In our experience, and based on
two sets of measurement data of actual children-at-play activity, we would expect that 75
children playing in the rear play area would produce approximately 52 dBA 1 at the western
property line. This calculation is based on our more conservative set of measured data of
children-at-play noise levels. Based on the other set of measurement data, we would
expect 50 dBA at the western property line due to children-at-play noise.
CALCULATION RESULTS COMPARED WITH CRITERIA
The daytime maximum allowable noise level at the applicable property line is 65 dBA.
Our calculations indicate that the Daytime Maximum Noise Level portion of the Municipal
Code will not be violated at this property line due to children-at-play noise associated with
the KinderCare establishment.
1 dBA-A-weighted sound pressure level (or noise level) represents lbe noisiness or loudness of a sound by
weighting the amplitudes of various acoustical frequencies to correspond more closely with human hearing.
A JO-dB (decibel) increase in noise level is perceived to be twice as loud. A-weighting is specified by the
U.S. EPA, OSHA, Caltrans, and others for use in noise measurements.
5-L~-
GENERAL ACOUSTICAL INFORMATION
Below fmd a table of typical sound levels associated with various noise sources. Note that
most noise levels are given with respect to the distance between the receiver and the
source. This reflects the fact that sound dissipates with distance.
Source Sound level (in dBA)
Rustline: leaves 55-66
Medium sized waterfall (at 10 feet) 69-70
Dog (at 10 feet) 80-90
Duck or goose (at 30 feet) 63-68
Cow (at 10 feet) 94
Nonnal Conversation (at 3 feet) 65
Person speaking, (at 10 feet) 55
Jet Aircraft (at 200 feet) 112
Truckl bus (at 50 feet) 85
Automobile (at 50 feet) 65
Whisner (at 3 feet) 42
We hope this infonnation proves useful. Should you have any questions or comments,
please call.
Sincerely,
CHARLEsM. SALTER ASSOCIATES, INC.
d~
J.-{~
Julie Malork
Senior Consultant
TAS_Cup'"ino 2-2004 Kmd""= R'portj'nd~
ç~)1
~-,:?,:;,c;3' uql'~ ~~.l b
APPROVAL U-a:;O3- \3
--
Planlling Commission j I;;¡ \Q1'
Signalure Þ .~
Ca.. ~h.accr
F£CEIVI:<;V
"" n c °c~o
,J..,., <.1' LcCJ
BY:
KinderCare@
KinderCare Center #1806
1515 S. DE ANZA BLVD.
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
RE-SUBMITT AL SET
Design Review
DECEMBER 29, 2003
f l1~OO[L@~ ~ ~~~(Q)@O& Lf[§~ ]
17802 MITCHELL NORTH, IRVINE, CA 92614. (949) 250-4117, FAX (949) 250-1676. www.tarios.com - ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS
ffi œ ~,
...i ';
~!( h
8~«(: I;
(IJ I e
(IJ, ~
0( I ,
011 ~ ~:
(IJ ~ ~ 5~
~ ~ ~ :!
o(~ ;1
...
I"
00
i;¡ !;i~
.,~ ã!1!í
8~~ ~~
~ ",ro wö
-g.S~ ~~
.-c ~~
"'6 :¡;B
v
.J
SITE NO. 1108
¡¡¡;;;¡-,.
CS1
~f\. - a>::>s-- 0"1 ,~2ûD~=!
API'ROVAL (.kð:Jû~--\3 l
--
¡;;¡
COHIIlIlssüm \ \ \,), 10l'
~ iait@aJ;~
c- MaMccr
~
---11L-
24 Chi",,"
"S.,! Child
840' 55'
~1----"L1l~
-.n
118
lliRfEU
~
24 Child,,"
"SJ.!Chlld
840" 5'
, , \~-
l- i u - u - u u uu - - u - ----_mi~ - m m
¡;;¡
LIFE SAFETY/LICENSING PLAN LEGEND
EGRESS REQUIREMENTS
PLUMBING FIXTURE REQUIREMENTS
ACTUAL OCCUPANCY LOAD
ADULT S.F. TOTAL TOTAL S.F. ~
ROOM I-CHILD CHILD PER AREA AREA PER.
RATIO CAPAC CHILD (REGS) (PLAN) CHILD I
(REGS,) . (PlAN) ai
50 400 499 62~'
50 400 491 61 !
" 280 299 ¡¡
35 280 285 "
35 500 573 "
J5 560 570 "
" 840 842 "
" 840 844 "
" 420 447
35 420 845
35 420 421
BUILOING DATA CODE ANALYSIS
~--""' ~ ocw. '1m
--,~.~~
ij;¡~_.....~,'m*'lu_-1
~.~- H'__,",'"
- n~ >-,
~ '"'---1
""- '-'---1
AU"",,~~"L
_,,*~~æ',
=~ ',~/" '"
""~;¡ IT : : :
(:":-:'.'~"
.m.,..m
"./m.,
~.I'. .,
~.I/~ .,
~-
",~'WI
.-..~"
..,
~"
~""~-"""~'
.0'. '""iE Ë' ¡ : ¡
.,~~ , ,
--, "-,,
--~,- -.-"~1
~.~M._.~_-
~.~,~oo,~~oo_~
~~~~_'~M_OO
,.~
B
ã
ã
ã
16
16
"
"
~
" ""~
u¡:,::'=-,. ¡~~~" ""'
=~- ~~,
...... ~, .- ""'*"
- - "". ,-- "'" * ,.
~ ,- '_1-
--,-> ""-." ',",,"""
-'~>-<'-~""-_'hl
~,:~ =-- ":'",:;:
~-. -~... - ,.,
.~..... ,-
:-:- '":,'::;" ,.. ¡ :::
~...
!!r~=~
, - ,
~
_.,~....-
,~-,-
-~,-......
'.--.......
"- ,- ~.,.
"_.....,~
~~,'~""'"
-., - O.'~
~
-
.,~,~",~-",
~ " "'
~1~ "-,,
¡;;¡
-v
r---l
L___J
.'_....~,"~,~-,~
~---~. ~.,.,_.,"
-"'"-"'-""
,'-,' ,,'
,'-,- ,,-
::~: ~:
~
=--.:~,.;::;.~.
~_.",""'~
~_.",""'"
.~"O~~
""-""-
:::;-. ""," * '.,
~.~
~~ ~~
I- ~ . b¿
'H~ I:
0 a ~ ~~
0 Z ( !è
(/)~ ~
(/), .
0( I !
oil ~ ~:
(/) 2 ~ ~~
0 ~(ill
..Jo d
II: Π2~
~ ( þ-
I"
'"
,,2 ~i
,,¡¡to ;5~
uUo :;u
~~~ ~~
,S'c ~~
"'" §B
"
....J
70
3š
Ë!
148
"
169
'[ã
SlTENO.18OØ
AO.2
----- .,-- --- ----_. --------- ---- ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN DATA
f¡>6f\ ~';\-cPI \ Ef'\ -õ::>\::.~;-l ß "'....
API'RdVAL J-êXf'::";--Ô ~ ~:'"'..::'.=:.,.o:::=-::-
'-- , ::":""'"::"~.M=._~
I ' U--'__~M~.~~_"""
n :"" I' '\\.;J.~r'4 ~~~.E":Fro::=T..~-=-
. ,ú/!/Ul!J"-On/l" U,O/l v ,-~.".~~--""",,"_~_H
I =.~~.---
",N
Si~+
,
1
"""",.
"""'"
ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES I ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN KEY NOTES
, -_._.__.,,~.,~---~
.n_..._'__-_._~o_..-
, :::.:::.----_~___.n_...-
: :::':::...ww____.n
¡ ::'::"'--"'-'~
: ::"'-d____""".-"'-
, hd_____'-.------
-___'_~h_~_..~.
,,=~-,_w.__ø-
".""------'-'---.'-
¡¡¡iF.:,=::~":';:'~.'-
:¡:::":::_""~-'~'-""-
H.----'_..'_h"-__"'_'-
- -- - ,-_.
..-------.-..---....-.
_._."""'____h__'_""~-
..==--
::::'::::'.'--""""--"_____'h
".:::'-
n~..._'...__n~--
[D ,-"""~_œ'~""""""","""~M~""",,,~
~
0 =..._"'-~~-
EJ ..~-"'--
0 ........."'-"""'-
EJ .._._"'-~._-
[D ......-
EJ ---~OO"'"~,
EJ """""'-
[;!J -~_._@
@) -~_._(j)
@) ~.::.'.';".\.~':::"I.~""~~-
@) ~-,~---~,......
@) ._¡"""'~-@@@
@) ~~
@) -",.",,~-,-(E@
""""".~=_.=......"'--
.,---,""',,-."""',._-
__"""",nm.,¡.,@
"'~-"'--
@) _.~~-~._"'.._""'.,¡.,
e!I ...~""""",.~~oo.@
e!I--""'."¡""@
~ ~~
[;;] -"""""'-""'I"--""@
~
@)
[ij]
~
[ij] ,-....
@ ,-..."
[ij] ~":'.."':.~~...'_..m_o._~_~
~ -_..~,,¡.,'
~ ;:'0:.-"'::'-""""'.-""'-
0 "'~"""""........,""""'~
~ """~ID_'~
«
N
Z
«I
----'
,,- J
w.
°1
,
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
~
@) ::;'=~';::'":~a::::::"':.'i':~"":1..~
[ij] :.:"""."':-~::;""':':'~-_._~~
I!!J "'oo=--~-~---.~
~ ~--,..........",~~
¡;;¡ -*..~,.."'-~~~
~ """"-"'...-~-
~ m'_""""",w",.'
~ """'.~-"""~.,¡~,
œJ =.~.....-,-"._-
@] ;:'~=~~~""""""'_~"WM=
,.,"'-
""""'-
--
~-
~
,,_mH"
~""""""'-~~.,..~~
__0> ~-
--~ n'K'N_m~....,~~~
...... ~..'"
~-~~':"
~-~
-~._-
-'G
---
PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE
~,-,.- -""""""
@ -_._~.~=
@ W_¡"""'-~~~=
@ _'*"""".M~~œ
@ ,,-.,,-~-,~,..-
..mo¡~
..m.,¡.'
@ø~
<D~~
@moo
@..._~
(j) --"""-~_.~
(j)--.-
@ --"'-~,,~.-
.. m. 0.'
.. m. 0.'
(j) ---....-
@~~
@ '-"--~',,'n'. ,..-
~-==':Œ~.:r.nl:" -
"~_Ð
t",--
@~~
@""""-'
@ -.-.
@..-w-
..m.'~~'
....,~."
",m.o¡.'
I E~:æ?.-I
PLAYGROUND NOTES
,.~"'_.."'--
~:='-~""-_U""""-~'~"'"
,~,~-~..~~"'--~
=:::'~'":.:'-=-"':.~~",:,,;:":'."=..,"i,
~Œ""""~""""-""'-.~--
:.".\':',~-~~.~._'_..~~-
:""oo"':i:1.:::;"".,,:~,):!'.:...~~"--"-
'OO~,M~~"-_~~-~"""'"
-,,~~=-.-
:.:l=-'-='~~'~~~_._'U'"
If) II '.
W a: ~.
I- = '.X
~ z ~ I:
g ~~ II
~. ~
0( I J
011 ~ j!
~ ~ ~ ~~
.J ñ ( .J
Ita: h
~( .
I"
'"
~ si;!
Q)~ ;Oi5
"U~ to ~~
U o:<u
:;;r:J'OCJ wõ
"Oc:1ii, ~~
.!:'ë ~!t'
"'" §a
Q)
-'
¡,,,,':¡;.It:I~1
'J::: ~
¡;;:
I~~
IARCHI1EClIIW.
SItE PIAN II1H
SItE DATA ~
PIA YGROON>
SCHEDUlE
'AI
110
,^~-".
SITE NClIlO8
¡¡;;¡;;¡¡;-."
AO.3
NOT USED
~~~~
~m.f
~=~-
J9,. '0= ~, -
~-"1Iil~t"r-
~I H Ir~
",;-----,. :~"
/" .'\ ~.~
.. ~Z
,...,-
ffi ~ E~
I- W , ~b
:~a ~ I:
g ~ ~ ;¡
(JJ ~
(JJ, .
< I ,
011 ~ ~:
(/) ß ~ ~~
()!:: ~ !~
oJ:¡: ( .~
OC 0 ~.
<~ þ-
F
n:;::~~":i:
"....~","
'"'~~"""
,=>
~ .::~ ~~ :,
~
f, 'r
..
@ FRONT ElEVATION
g~;!!i%
"-5' .
~
,,-~
5'-1'
:;,-::::,~"
¡;":'~-
"-5'
"""""'-"""""",,m
77;Z
/ú'¿L',/L////,j
I"
7//¿
171 NOT USED
13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
".J
HlYBUILT-l1P
ROOIlNGSYSYEM
r~,",
-~~
--
~
J!
I,'_œro~"
~3'
~
In
" s!~
"'~ '"15
60~ <D ;\;;
0 O:¡ò
,,(¡OlD wõ
i?,s ~ ~~
'-C ~~
"'6 §i'J
'"
...J
"""""""'"
""'n'.~
--~
~~
or-""""-",,,,-
BASKETBALL HOOP & STRIPING -~,"".,. (18J TYP.PLAYGROUNDPOSTFTG. _¥M.,.
NOT USED
NOT USED
14] TRASH ENCLOSURE
-"...,""
m
.-.."" ,.............. """"
-.-"""'.......
þ"""¡"""""'"
,._~~
~~~
!ii ;:~
f:..:.-'OO"",
"or=-~
,""_no
,..~~..~->
=,t~
:¡..=-~,.=
~,oo-
-~.
~.-
~u-
.....-
-
i,%'"",=",:-
~..1.::i"=-
19] BOLLARD BARRIER POST
15] BICYCLE RACK
-,'.,""
SITE NO. 1806
AO,3,1
201 HOPSCOTCH LAYOUT
""""""J
SI¡:nature-
...........
"".--~-~~~~_.
~"-~ """"
--~ """-
"""""""
"".--~-=~,~~-,.~
~'-'~ """"
--~ "'--
TWO'S TRIKE TRACK
A I THREE'S & FOUR'S TRIKE TRACK
-~,...."'
, ~Æ!:f~~~r:~~:.:~~
,. :.$.~ ~\~::;..:¡:,:,.vl:J:;::t"' ~~,
I '~'-. -'~'*'MI
;;::"::'.:Ji ',0;:,
I-~;:];;;¡~*-I
TWO'S PI AVGROUND
~
, E:"::'~~I!.p;~?œ:.t~~
,. ¡¡;.~~ ~'~"'I.'~-~~...
"~~~M'."Ir':;-;:':¡",~':!f".';¡"'":.'IIJ'..~,
I-'K_""-I
::.::..,::::;:::::
j M'-r l
INFA", !TODDLER PLAYGROUND
..........,..
~~...--~._~-~ ~~~.. ~~ ~-~
=-~-"'~'
""""""^"
~.ttO ...-- -.-, ~ -~ ~~~. -,., -~*~
=-~-'I"'
INFANT I TODDLER & TWO'S PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
C J THREE'S & FOUR'S PLAYGROUND EQUIPMI1!'iT
-~"--"",
-~,,-.,-",
PLAYGROUND GENERAL NOTES
m ~ E~
~;~ n
O¡;~ ~~
°ffi< Ie
~, ~
0( I ,
all ~ ~:
o. .¡,
(/) w ~ ..
O~'1
.Jã<.i
~I ~~
F(
'__'M_":.:!f,"'k""">_'!l~~~
~:¡:;.¡:;'..~.=~~.=...- ..-
, ~"!:1:'::IK~""::::! t: ~~..=':::'"
'=V"""-~"I..-J"::?i-."1:,'IJ::"~
F.-::ï.~ ~ ~.:;:" ~-::;";~"'~
..,-.~.."., _œ_'~ .......~_.
":;":....,"":¡';1.o:;:"_":"é""""--
.._-~'~'-~'~..n
=:::1'::::---"'-r.~1:o1.~.::..:'.
, ~~:7.::'!îiir~:r..:'ir.::-
EQU""""-~
¡:¡"W'=~~='II:"""'"
w."","'",,"'" """"-"1""
~;,.~¡:;""."'_."""""'.
: = '..':M, w= 1',J'i ~ ~
I"
SAND AND ""'" TAØ.fS
-:~.
.....""",-.,.........,
"""",-"-,"--""""",--"-",,,->
All 'LA""""" EQUIPMENT MUST BE INSTAlLED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH 11iE .AI"'.ocTURERS lNS'AllAm, 'NTRUCTIOHS
on
Q; '¡;i
Q)~ ffii5
60~<D ;:;';j
0 0 ¡¡¡:¡
~g'~ ~g
Sï: :;¡¡;
""6 §i3
Q)
-'
B
TRIKE TEXTURES
_II>.
AO.4
D ] SAFETY SURFACING
EXTERIOR FINISH PATTERNS
~
I
~
~"H~"'~
=,'^"
o~
~'f'"
~~!,"~'"
(£; EAST SIDE EXTERIOR ELEVATION
@ EAST FRONT EXTERIOR ELEVATION
EXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES
, ",-~~_*""'N_-
, ro""""",,..*_~""m",c
,~-~-,--,~"~~
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
~.
F
~
"
_,1-
'~""""~-'.'ð
~
,..~
."~~",,
01
M
PDI\-~--()C) I Ð\-~~';-I1<'¡:\\o¡
~ APPROVAL u-ô;::o;;-- \3
.--
'~
M'-I"~
,f,
,.~
,."'~~~~~~~~
,..-~~-*_.....-
ffi ~ E~
I-w.bY
~ ~ ~ =§
°u ¡¡
gid;
OJ, ~
0( I .
011 ~ ~!
(/)ß~ h
01-- 2
.J~(!J
II: Π"5
~( ~
"=,~
/
" "":;:'~
-" M-._'"
" """"
MŒ~-I"""':"'..+
,.~~
EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY NOTES
EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEY PLAN
~
ill "",,.~-",'_"*'œ~'~
0 =~",.-'n'~~-
[B .'"",",,~-
0 ~~'~"~""'."~ ..""......
II] .._~.~-,~~=,
ill ..,-~.-."""""'-
ill "-~'-""~"'~'
I!!I _O~-"'~","'
@] "~-~""'I""
@] '"'-~~,._,_.
@] :;:~==~~~.&.~¡'=-~~
@] =~œ..~'_"""'"."'."'.'~"~
[;;] ~~""",,","
[;;] -'~"M~Mm""I.'
@] œ~~"",""."~"~
¡;!] :::.':"..~-=~':;..~~~.:':."
¡;!] ~~~~~~~..~._.~"
{;;] ~~~.=:~"~'~"-'
@ --~-"~"~"'~'~M'
êJ ~~
êJ .._~_""'~œ'-
¡¡;¡ =,~~_._..-...~.._.~.
êJ ..~_-."..'œ=~
êJ '"-~,~
~
~
~
r
._-~--~,~.~~
'..,_ro.,,~
: E. ~EE= ...=~ ~
I ~:...",,=--::~~-=~~.: I
êJ ._~-~_.W".....,,'"=._.
§J œ~,--(oo,"'~=I."~'~'~
@ :::::""=:;i'~"","'".._...œ.-
[!;J :i."':.~';:;,~.ru_ro.œ...._...~...~
"'7"A
-~
~
lL_u-_ò'u ':'_-"-_V_-_.i-u-"~-- -'c-l:
I"
<n
V ¡¡;~
"'~ ffii'j
8<'!~ ~~
-h'~~~
.S" :;:¡¡;
"'5 §13
'"
-'
I
,i.
~ISI1ENO.18O8
..... ..
A2.1
-
.~~~-~O::.~""~'XV" _.~~':.';'-:~l, ~r
'V""V - 'V"'V
""","NIÐN,. - ".LO,..LIHO.....
S3.L 'o'IOOSS'o' 'II SO'¡'¡'o'.L --
VlN'It""VO 'ON"",dnO
m>lls VZNV 30 's ""
908L#
SJ81U8J 6U!UJO8l
8JOJJ8PU!>I
"Y
i~z
:;¡~:S
~~o.
~ ~
. i ~~~
2 Π":\ .'
:;.2Ih . .¡¡ .~
.,0 U O"~., ..
j! H ~~~~~ ~~
~ ~~
r i~
I J it
~I
II gggggg H
. ::::¡¡ I,
~ ~
0" t. 10
~~~~~~ ~
~ ~ ~
S ! ~
~ ~
g g
. .
~ -
g ~
I -~!~~ ~i~
~ i! I~ 11 Ii I inn II II I !dd!
~ § ,I Ii Ii Ii! I! I; 1111 IE dH; ;; Ii II
~ ~~ rOo I) o@ @ ~ 0 [] Ii [ill
¡¡'~\.::)
0~V^::JlnO8
VZNV
i
~z-¡
i
It
~ ! 2¡ II ~¡ i ~ ~\ 2
r ~~9 '.! ftH 12
!~ ~ ~ ~t I, ~ ~ I!i i :!
~ ~ ~i~ t~ ~i ~ i ~!§ , di
I ~ tf ~I I~ g I ~ i ; ~!;t
, ! J¡! '0 ~' § . !§~ ~ .ii.
& ~ ! N 5~ 5~ ~¡ i~ ¡Ii d U~I
~ ¡ , 9§~ Ii ¡¡ ~i i¡ @!!I !~ o(i~
; i ~~ !iï ~I I.;! ~§ It'l' ~rl~li
¡ ~'§i ~.¡ ti~ fi ~~ 2~ ~ i~ ~!I
:1 ~gl! ~~~ 'I- ~~ ¡ hl~ !~ I~jj
i !H d~ M !~ §! !' I !~ g! §
i ! ¡iii !Ii HI II II 1m 1¡ :M
; . . r,' "
30
~
;:;
ii::
~ï 1m, i
Ii ¡Ig i~
,. ~¡ Ii! Ii
~ II ~¡i II
~._..'."
~"
G
~¡
i . ~¡
pI
H§ ~
! ;i~i ~
l .¡gm ¡¡j
, ., I'!
" -I ~
!d h ~
~.. ,. ID
id~ "i~ "
-' i" ~ -'
!~ U ~
5~ ~ 's IL
I :~ ~n; I:
- . . @)
J.EGAL,OrSCOPTION
SHARON
DRIVE
:IIIl.<.J!fæORL
:.\:'".. O¡::::'~~:k ~,~';"";:¡~':;, "" "on " """"'.
.........."....."""""_....~"'..,"~ """""'~..",..,
""""'-"'-"'~.,',...."."."
~":"::;':"~.'."':.::.':::,~:'::~.~~::',:""""""" "',
=~+'7:~~:~;?;~'~~~~~:¡~:,
O_""""""""""""""'"""'~.~"""""""""""""
:::;'~::::~~"::".,~~::.\'~':',":"::,".""'..o~,"""""
..... " "'" ."".. ,.. ~""... ,._,,~... "'"""
0 \'.:'~.':.'~.':\",::"','\""~"'-"""~~~"'~
4
NO. j 24
!~
j!
Ñ
~
~
8
5
~
"
~
.K
~
~
~
i!
~
~
ft~A -ã;i)3- Dc? ¡~I 1\ =11
API'ROVALU-'~s,-I:5
£A~æD3,-15 ---
Pla/lIIlng CoIIIUlI$$IOII' i{¡;;;! Q:f'1
.....
Sisn~løe ~i@!J ~
, Ca.a al.."""
DUCKETT
WAY
~I
CI
;1
::iE,
«
...,
PROSPECT ROAD
~;¡;.,2'i(Ñi7.iii"'T'ii) ~,.-..~,,7 ,,¡
GRAPHIC SCALE
----
h..-...LU' j
, ~~:'i:)"
~
(D 01"'" ..,-"""",,,
0 """"""""""". ""'-"""". "'.. "'..~",
0 """"'".""",,"""",,.
IT] """""""N'~"""""'.
0 ",.."'....""..."" """""""""".
0 """"""'~"""~"'M",""'m,
(D """"""""""'M.__""'~"'"""""",
ill "".m..""",.
[jJ """.'.m_'~",,~~.
~ """"'~,~~"'."""",
I!TI """"""" "'M """",
¡;j] _""'-_"m""",~~~",~,~"""'",""'.
!ill ...""""'"""..",..""""""'"""',.
8 ..."""""w,_...""""'""'"""""-,~,-"""",
I!B """""""""",.."""",,,
E!I """"""'","'~""",n".
¡;j] "'.."','" """"".
êJ """,. "'" "'M """".
êJ ""'--~,.,~,~._,.."~"""""",...,,.....
~œ-..."-~."""",.w"""",,,
êI ",.."'~""'~"'..,=...
"" """""'~",..,,"""".
êI "",. """'~""'.
!ill """.. ""......, """"".
18 """""""~"..o<..""""",m"""""""""",,,,.., .
êJ ""..~,,_.
êI ".~
êI """'" ....".. '" -"","'" n..,
j! """"'m,m"",...",.."",.~",
l!!!Œ:...
'_"""""""'~"""""'..u""".,m_",,,.~,
''""'°
a._-
L._'~
U'~'ø
. ._.,-
. ..~w..
. ._,~
~ ~~":=...
æ lE"æ. ¡ ]r
f ¡~¥. ~¡~5:
"."._-~ ".-.
: ::-: ~:::::
a ...- t .~".
0 .w., . ._,.
~ ~~;_m- r ~~.~
~ ~~:: U!Ët-
!f~:' i~
E:.:=~ ~!~~ê'.:~'
!!!!!!!!!L-
::'::::i:".~
~:æ;:. '" -",,-
:. ::."~ .--- -""_..~
: :::::: " ,--
_.",.~.
E-- u.,,-
~ am.m
1:; w~.
°=
; om.-
. ~.-
ß ~.
. au.
~ -
@ --
@ -...-.
(j) ~_.
e-
'i' -~
¡¡;¡ -~_..
Ii> --
Œ> _aa~
@ _.,,-~..
@) -.
(j) ~:~.',~~
--,~,"- a,.,-
~..,.-
~::gJ"~,~)
R/W
SEenOll A-A
~
Sm:~
~,'
lilliill
I"""'.'"
!
¡;
~
~
if
"
.,
is.
"""'" "I """
VICINITY MAP
BASIS OF B£ABINGS
"'....,.....",.. """"".".. ",,"""""""-........
'~-~,""."""'-~~. ""'.M"""O"""
1i:',,~~"'o""'-","',",,""""""""""
.&£tI!:!!..JL!B
"",,""_.,,.~.," .."""..."'...,,"(~)
) ¡r:.:¡,.~:\"oWw.,;,:~;:~'~:¡,:¡:,,~"""'"
~
,.. -'-, ~ ""'~ ".. ..,.. ""'. MW 0 ""~ ,,"',..,
~::¡~"':\".:=~~.:i'
,._"..~,,~" _Œ",rom"", "'mo. "". "'^""
"""""""OK "'0"""""'"
""'(~."'~")
== ']'..:.:,'::;' ~~~:. ~~ ;::¡: ~~'
~¡'~~w..~~::::;""""""".O""')
""'i'~.."::,\"1J,':.;~;~'",.."."."~"""""",,,.
~'="..~1o!:,""¡'~"'~"~"'_'M"'~","
o. ~,::.':\".",":"..~ I:;"',i.;~~ ~¡:",=~~~::;:¡<.
~:;~N'='l:'¡:~g:¡,:~.:~¡,'¡~~~""""""""
'.~""'.""-"""""""W'E""_"""'~,-
i:1, \'S~:S'..Hi.::~*'~~" M~Fæ';:: ,,~,?.~"'~,
5!
i
I!;
""-_ro~""""""""""'~".W"""""""', '"
"""""'OE.".".""",~,",,_'.._m'_"..-
~,.."'".~"_..~...,..,,.,"',......
~ ~
:z;~g
:) § ~ ~
a.. ~ ~ ¡;¡
W1):;¡¡1!;
I-;;j:!: !i
Vii;!'; 8
g;;~
~-~
PBOJECT StJIIMARY 1ABU:
:",W';:',,~:':;O;::.':¡.'J¡'U""'(""-)
"..."",..,,",~,.~.,.n'
::.::"..."n.."" ,
....,.., n "OlIO (""~)
!!:~: '! ~ffi!: ~: :~
~o""",.."",*",,"N
""',.."",~"~,."""..,,
""""""',~=""".
~'.:::..~-":::::~:n:::::~:::o.:::
('~"""'."""""""""""""""")
""""""""""'."""""""'~""'"
I!;
5
~
PLAN PREPARED roR
KlNDERCARE LEARNING
CENTERS, INC.
050 NE NOlUOAY STREET. STE 140O
POOruNO. OR 97232
.
.
i
~
.
!
~
~
!
"
<
'"
'ssvr DA'"
12-19-03
ORA" BY
1\'0
CHECK" BY
CO
JOB NO.
KINO3123
SHUT NO.
1
OF 1 5HŒTS
ARCHITECT
TARLOS I< ASSOCIATES
17B02 MITCNELl NOOTN
IBVlNE. CA 9281'
('<OJ 350-<"7
EAST FRONT EXTERIOR ELEVATION
DRAWI Q NO. I UAI~ JUI 00. If OWN~ING REDESIGN 12.15.03 SITE DEVELOPtÆNT ~ KinderCare
10.24.03 664.DD9 REVEW sœMIT AI.
SCALE ClECKED IXJCUI.£NT FOR. Learning Centers
01.0 I N.T.s. - -1806
I SITE NO, EXTERIOR
~8m~ ELEV A TIONS KinderCare. 1515 s, DE ANZA STREET
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
Ij~1
JÁN (JQ 200'1
ßY'
u-ax:'Y3--I-
ArI'ROVAI.P6t~l'K?~;(t\ 'ó
---
\ I ~ \'-v->.-
Plalllling Comllllssl"" ~
",..
s¡cne!(:re~d. ~L
c... Mo.a;«
.*;L
1r ARLOS & ASSOC~A TIES
AA<CHDTE<CTS - EINIGDINIEEAS
~.D.~. - ~.IR.~.
~7eO2 MITCHELL !FAX U~49) 250-~676
IRVINlE. CA. 926~4 (949) 260-4117
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
FAX (408) 777-3333
CITY OF
CUPEIQ1NO
Community Development Department
SUMMARY
Agenda No. Je..
Agenda Date March 1. 2004
Application No.: Z-2003-03, TM-2003-03, U-2003-05, EXC-2003-04, EA-20O3-11
Applicant: Ken Busch I Regis Homes
Property Location: 21255 Stevens Creek Boulevard
APPLICATION SUMMARY:
Consider request to reconsider Application Nos. 2-2003-03, TM-20O3-03, U-2003-05,
EXC-2003-04, EA-2003-11.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council may take one of the following actions:
1. Reject the reconsideration petition;
a. The City Council may direct the applicant to submit new development
applications based on one of the conceptual plans;
2. Refer one of the conceptual plans to the Planning Commission for a report
and recommendation to the City Council;
3. Re-open the public hearing and then re-vote on the original application;
BACKGROUND
Please refer to the attached staff report from the February 17, 2004 City Council
hearing. The attached plan set shows the project that was denied by the City
Council on December 15, 2003.
Enclosures:
Staff report and attachments from February 17, 2004
Plan Set denied on December 15, 2003
Prepared by: Peter Gilli, Senior Planner
~~.
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Approved by:
~
David W. Knapp
City Manager
P'¡nted on Recycled Paper
b-(
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
FAX (408) 777-3333
Community Development Department
SUMMARY
Agenda No.-
Agenda Date February 17, 2004
Application No.: 2-2003-03, TM-20O3-O3, U-20O3-05, EXC-2003-04, EA-20O3-11
Applicant: Ken Busch / Regis Homes
Property Location: 21255 Stevens Creek Boulevard
APPLICATION SUMMARY:
Consider request to reconsider Application Nos. 2-2003-03, TM-20O3-03, U-2003-05,
EXC-20O3-04, EA-2003-11.
RECOMMENDATION:
The City Council may take one of the following actions:
1. Continue the item until all members of the City Council are present, as
requested by the applicant;
2. Reject the reconsideration petition;
a. The City Council may direct the applicant to submit new development
applications based on one of the conceptual plans;
3. Refer one of the conceptual plans to the Planning Commission for a report
and recommendation to the City Council;
4. Re-open the public hearing and then re-vote on the original application;
BACKGROUND
The applicant, Regis Homes, proposed demolition of vacant commercial area and
the construction of 49 townhouse units at the Oaks Shopping Center. On December
15, 2003, the City Council denied the proposed project at the Oaks Shopping Center
on a 2-2-1 vote. Regis Homes petitioned for reconsideration on December 23, 2003
(attached).
The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on Wednesday, February 4, 2004. Staff
did not attend this meeting.
DISCUSSION
Option 1: Continuance
The applicant requests a continuance until such time that all City Councilmembers
are present (attached).
Printed on Recycled Paper
~ -J....
Regis Homes Reconslderation
2
Option 2: Legislative Act
In a letter addressed to the City Council dated February 10, 2004 (attached), the City
Attorney outlined the legal basis for this reconsideration and advised that the
rezoning component is a legislative action that is not subject to reconsideration.
Thus, the Council can choose to reject the petition for reconsideration.
Option 2a: Re-file Development Applications
The applicant submitted two new conceptual plans summarized as follows:
Table 1: Comparison of Conceptual Alternative Plans
Denied Plans
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Residential Units 49 29 35
Commercial Area (sq. ft.) about 53000 about 59,000 about 56,000
Plan Elements Retam Mary Avenue Retain Mary Avenue
Narrow Mary Avenue width width
Remove vacant theater Remove vacant theater Remove vacant theater
and restaurant and restaurant and restaurant
Remove Tsunami Keep Tsunami Sushi Keep Tsunami Sushi
Sushi tenant space tenant space tenant space
Add 3,000 sq. ft. to the
west of Tsunami Sushi
* The Oaks Shopping Center currently has about 71,000 sq. ft. of commerdal area
If the City Council believes that one of the conceptual plans has merits then the
Council should reject the reconsideration and direct the applicant to re-apply for
development applications and pay the appropriate review fees.
Option 3: Refer conceptual plans to the Planning Commission
The City Council could choose to refer the applicant's concepts to the Planning
Commission for review. These new plans will require levels of review consistent
with a brand new development application:
. The environmental review documents must be modified to reflect the
changed plan and a new traffic study may be necessary since the additional
commercial area is expected to have more traffic impacts than the former
project.
. Detailed plans must be reviewed by the City's Planning, Building,
Engineering, Traffic and Environmental Resources division, in addition to the
County Fire Department, County Sheriff, Cupertino Sanitary District,
Cupertino Unified School District and Fremont Union High School District
prior to the Planning Commission hearing.
~ -J
Regis Homes Reconsideration
3
Due to the level of review required, staff believes it is more appropriate to have the
applicant re-apply and pay new review fees (Option 2a).
Option 4: Re-open Public Hearing
As outlined in the City Attorney's letter, the Council is not obligated to reconsider
the application since the past action was a legislative act. The Council could choose
to re-open the public hearing specifically to allow the applicant to respond to issues
related to past attempts to lease the vacant space in the center. Then the Council
should re-vote on the previous plan concept.
Enclosures:
Reconsideration Letter dated December 23, 2003
Continuance Request dated February 9, 2004
City Attorney Letter dated February 10r 2004
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Prepared by: Peter Gilli, Senior Planner
;(t].
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Approved by:
~~¿
David W. Knapp
City Manager
~-y
REGIS I HOMES
December 23, 2003
[5) IE ~ IE D WI [E fn\
ml DEC 2 9 2003 l!JJ
CUPERTINO CITY CLERK
Ms. Kim Smith
City Clerk
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Ave
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Via Fax (408) 777-3366
RE: Request for Reconsideration of Applications Nos. Z-2003-03, TM-2003-03, U-
2003-05, EXC-2003-04, EA-2003-ll, Ken Busch/Regis Homes, 21255 Stevens Creek
Boulevard, APN 326-27-035 (Oaks Shopping Center/The Oaks)
Dear Ms. Smith
We request a reconsideration of the decision made by the City Council on The Oaks
agenda item based on Municipal code section 2.08.096 for the following reasons.
We met with the city council and planning commission in a study session to discuss the
proposed improvements at The Oaks and the vacation of Mary Ave in May and were
encouraged to continue the planning process including the vacation of Mary Ave. We
continued to be encouraged by and had numerous meetings with city staff regarding the
improvements and the vacation of Mary Ave. The planning commission also
recommended approval of the improvements and vacation of Mary Ave. During the city
council meeting the public meeting was closed and the city council discussed the benefits
and their concems of the proposal and never gave the applicant the opportunity to address
council concerns, of which we had no prior indication. The city council should have
given the applicant the opportunity to address the concerns raised by the city council.
At the city council meeting there was significant discussion and questions regarding the
attempts to lease the vacant space on the western portion of the shopping center and the
overall retail environment in Cupertino. During the city council discussion it appeared
we should have provided additional detail of the leasing efforts and the overall retail
Regi' Horn.. of Northern Californi" Inc.
901 Marin", ¡'IOIld BouJevard. Sui" 700. SOIl Ma"o. Califnrnia 94404
T, 650-378-2800 F, 650-570-2233
~ -S-
environment in Cupertino. We were not aware this information would be required, and
feel it would have an impact on the decision made by the city council.
The city council decision is not consistent with the planning commission
recommendation, the city staff report and the information presented at the public meeting.
Lastly, Mayor Sandra James stated that although there was no conflict of interest she
would not vote on The Oaks agenda item, but would chair the meeting. Since Mayor
James does not have a fmandal interest in The Oaks agenda item she should have taken
part in the vote of this item. However, once she stated she would not vote on this item
she had an obligation to not chair the meeting and leave the council chambers. This
impacted the city council from conducting a fair hearing on this item.
In summary, we feel the City of Cupertino criteria for reconsideration are met and we ask
the city council to reconsider the above referenced item. If there are any questions please
contact me at (650) 377-5805.
Sincerely,
þÇ~'"
Ken Busch
Cc:
Chuck Kilian (408)777-3401
Steve Piasecki (408) 777-3333
~~
~O4 14:40 t.U DOO v'v uvv
REGIS I HOMES
February 9, 2004
Ms. Kim Smith
City Clerk
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Ave
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Via Fax (408) 777-3366
RE: Reconsideration of Applications Nos. 2-2003-03, TM-2003-03, U-2003-05, EXC-
2003-04, EA-2003-lJ, Ken BuschiRegis Homes, 21255 Stevens Creek Boulevard, APN
326-27-035 (Oaks Shopping CenterlThe Oaks Reconsideration)
Dear Ms. Smith
It has come to our attention that not all City Councill11embers will be present when the
City Council reconsiders the above referenced applications on February 17. 2004. We
request that the reconsideration be rescheduled to a date that all City Council members
are present. We do not have an objection to this reconsideration to be schedule beyond
sixty days fTom the filing of our petition.
If there are any questions please contact me at (650) 377-5805.
Sincerely, ./.,
þ: I ~~
Ken Busch
Cc:
Chuck Kilian (408) 777-3401
Steve Piasecki (408) 777-3333
Rogis HOlnC¡ ofNortbern C&lifomi,. In~
901 Morin", 1>1>.nd Bvul.~,"'. ,oJ", 700. Son M,,~, Cclifomi> 94404
T: MO.37S.2snO F, 650-570-2233
~-I
~
CITY OF
CUPEIQ1NO
Office of the City Attorney
10320 S. DeAnza Blvd., #1D
Cupertino, CA 95014
Ph: (408) 777-3403
Fax: (408) 777-3401
Charles T. Kilian
City Attorney
Eileen H. Murray
Assistant City Attorney
February 10, 2004
Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Re:
Request for Reconsideration of Applications Nos. 2-2003-03,
TM-2003-03, U-2003-05, EXC-2003-04, EA-2003-11, Ken Busch/Regis
Homes, 21255 Stevens Creek Boulevard, APN 326-27-035 (Oaks
Shopping CenterlThe Oaks)
Dear Mayor and City Council:
The above applicants have requested reconsideration of the council's
previous decision made on December 15, 2003 in which the above-described
applications were denied by a 2-2 vote with one abstention. The key decision
was to deny the applicants' request for a re-zoning of the Oaks Shopping Center
(Application Z-2003-03). The denial of the change of zone request rendered
moot the remaining applications for a tentative subdivision map, use permit, and
exception.
The adoption or amendment of a zoning ordinance is a legislative act
generally requiring no specific findings of fact. Arnel Development Companv v.
Citv of Costa Mesa, 28 Cal. 3d 511,169 Cal Rptr. 904 (1980). Government
Code Section § 36 936 provides that the passage of any ordinance requires the
recorded majority vote of the total membership of the city council. Hence, the
council's 2-2-1 vote as to Application Z-2003-03 resulted in a denial of the
application.
~-r
The Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
February 10, 2004
Page 2
Municipal Code Section 2.08.095 provides that any interested party may
file a petition with the city clerk seeking reconsideration of any adjudicatory
decision of the city council. The denial of the applicant's re-zoning request was
a legislative, not an adjudicatory act. Hence, reconsideration of the decision is
not appropriate.
Assuming, for purposes of argument, however, that the council could re-
consider its previous decision, any request must specify precise grounds for
reconsideration. The council cannot consider any other grounds not specified in
the request.
The applicants have specified three grounds for re-consideration:
1) Municipal Code Section 2.08.096 B (1) provides that the city council
may re-open the hearing to consider "new relevant evidence which, in the
exercise of reasonable diligence, could not have been produced at any earlier
city hearing." The applicant argues that the council, after hearing all sides,
closed the public hearing, discussed the application raising concerns regarding
the applicant's attempts to lease vacant space and the overall retail environment
in Cupertino. According to the applicant, the council should have re-opened the
hearing to allow the applicant to present additional evidence regarding these
issues.
The question before the city council is whether the applicant should have
reasonably foreseen these concerns and therefore should have included the
information in its presentation. If so, then the applicant failed to utilize due
diligence in presenting its case. If not, the council, if it allows any
reconsideration at all, may wish to re-open the hearing for the limited purpose of
presenting this "new" information.
2) Municipal Code Section 2.08.096 B 5(a) provides that a rehearing may
be allowed if the council abused its discretion by "not proceeding in a manner
required by law." In this case, the applicant simply alleges that the "city council's
decision is not consistent with the planning commission recommendation, the
city staff report or the information presented at the public hearing."
The applicants fail to present any legal authority, nor can they, for the
proposition that city council decisions should always be consistent with a
planning commission recommendation or staff report. Furthermore, the
applicants fail to demonstrate that its denial is inconsistent with all the
information which was provided by all parties.
~-1
The Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
February 10, 2004
Page 3
3) The applicants also argue, without citing any specific grounds in the
City's reconsideration procedural ordinance, that Mayor Sandra James should
not have abstained from the vote. Legal research by this office fails to disclose
any competent legal authority which prohibits council member from abstaining
from a vote, particularly when the council member outlined her reasons for not
voting.
In the event that the applicants attempt to use the reconsideration
process to present a new plan which was not previously considered by either the
planning commission or the city council, evidence regarding the new proposal
should not be considered as grounds for reconsideration.
Section 65857 of the California Government Code provides that the citY
council may approve, modify or disapprove the recommendations of the planning
commission with respect to re-zoning of property; however "any modification of
the proposed ordinance or amendment by the legislative body not previouslv
considered by the planning commission... shall be referred to the planning
commission for report and recommendation..." Hence, with respect to any
proposed new plan, the council should either reject it and direct the applicant to
re-apply or refer it back to the planning commission for a report pursuant to
Section 65857.
Recommendations
(1) The city council should reject the petition for reconsideration since the
instant decision was legislative and not adjudicatory in nature.
(2) If the city council wishes to consider the petition, it should determine
whether any grounds exist to justify reconsideration. Aside from the request to
present new information, the petition fails to provide any colorable basis for
reconsideration. If the council finds that the applicants' failure to present
additional information was excusable, then it should re-open the hearing for the
limited purpose of hearing the new information and then re-vote on the
application.
(3) In the event that the applicants seek to present a new plan not
previously considered, then the new plan should either be rejected (subject to
re-application) or referred to the planning commission for a report and
recommendation to the city council.
~-fO
The Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
February 10, 2004
Page 4
I will be happy to answer questions from the council at the next council
meeting.
~
Charles T. Kilian
City Attorney
CTKldej
cc: City Clerk
City Manager
Director of Planning & Community Development
City Clerk
~ -\ \
:;EB,!1.1004 !:O5PM
AVERY/ACCO
NO, 6 ¡ 4 7
P, 1
130 E. Dana Street
Mount,in View, California 94041-1599
J}.
~ery
C:ONSTRUCTION
Telephone (650) 961.mO
Fax (650) 965-9166
COMPANY
February 11, 2004
Honorable Members of the Cupertino City Council
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Re: Application Number Z-2003-03, Request to Rezone Oaks Shopping Center
Dear Honorable Members of the Cupertino City Council:
We oppose the rezoning the Oaks Shopping Center. Based on our thirty years of managing
the Glenbrook apartments across the street we con honestly say that the recent economic
cycle has been a tough one but things are starting to get better. We don't like having 29
vacant apartments right now but we would never consider a change of use. But we know that
we have to put up with economic cycles.
There is little we can do to educate you because you are experienced at analyzing issues in
Cupertino. However we would ask three questions:
1. If the Heitman Group from Chicago wants to maximize their investment at the Oaks
Shopping Center why would they not at least talk to Peter Pau of Sandhill Development about
his desire to purchase and build a new Shopping Center? (parenthetically, I have only met him
a few times but observed Peter Pau for the last 15-years and he is a no-nonsense, straight
forward person who puts his money where his mouth is. We have a property in San Mateo
and I have observed his tenacity in making large developments work from start to end. What
he could do at the Oaks Shopping Center with new retail buildings would be phenomenal for
the citizens of Cupertino, the city sales tax revenue, and the obvious increase in property
taxes. The Heitman website advertises five shopping centers for sale but only 2.5 acres of
land is listed under the Oaks. Why not .consider" an outright sale?
2. A slide was shown at the last City Council meeting to explain the dozens of improvements
that could be made to the shopping center if the Regis Homes proposal was allowed to go
ahead. It Included painting the shopping center and adding new signage and taking care of
trees. The applicant has gone to great lengths to try and convince council members that an
anchor tenant cannot be found for the Oaks Shopping Center and it begs a question: if these
improvements were done by the owner in advance of looking for a tenant, would it not help the
situation? (parenthetically, I have never seen an owner in Cupertino have to wait to lease a
space in order to paint their property or improve signage).
3. When we look at the Heitman website, www.Heitman.com/propertybrokers,asp you will see
that Heitman is advertising the sale of the 2.5 acres called 'The Oaks Land." This begs the
question, is the priority selling the land or trying to lease the anchor space at the Oaks
Shopping Center. and is this the practice that the City Council wants to encourage other
shopping center owners to follow during the low point of an economic cycle?
Like so many people involved in this issue, we do not think of ourselves as opponents of a
development, but we are opponents of a change in ~ to a well-located retail center. We also
D/B/Ltr/5003
~ -IL
FEB, !!. 2004 !: 05PM
AVERY/ACCO
NO, 6 ¡ 47
P, 3
want to be part of the solution. In this regard, we have called one prospective tenant and have
offered a $500,000 contribution (purely a contribution and not an investment) towards the
tenant improvements necessary to locate at the Oaks. We hope this shows the depth of our
conviction that the Oaks is in a great location and just needs to be spruced up to enjoy the
economic recovery.
It may sound trite, but aren't we talking about the intersection of Stevens Creek and Highway
85 in Cupertino, California? To think that the only way Heitman Group (with billions of dollars
under management) can afford to paint and improve signage in this "An location is if a
homebuilder pays them money for 2.5 acres is beneath people who have a load of confidence
in this city as it stands today, and into the future. Count us amongst those with loads of
confidence. That is why we are long term owners in your city,
Sincerely,
~~
Brian Avery/
2
DlBlLtr/5003
~-{3
Darrel W. Lum, DDS
28395 Pacifica Driue
Suite 102
Cupertino, California 95014
rö)! [ë C IE ~ WI IE rR\
['ùB~
CUPERTINO CITY CLERK
February 25, 2004
City Council
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Auenue
Cupertino, California 95014
Sandra James, Mayor
Patrick: Kwok:, Uice Mayor
Richard Lowenthal
Dolly Sandoual
Kris Wang
Re: Regis Homes Request for Reconsideration of Applications #Z-2003-
03, TM-2003-03,U-2003-05,EHC-2003-04,EA-2003-11
Regis Homes stated that" ... the city council discussed the benefits and their
concerns of the proposal and neuer gaue the applicant the opportunity to
address council concerns, of which we had no prior indication, The city council
should haue giuen the applicant the opportunity to address the concerns raised
by the city council," Regis specifically stated"... there was significant discussiOt
and question regarding the attempts to lease the uacant space on the western
portion of the shopping center and the Duerall retail enuirDnment in Cupertino.
During the city council discussion it appeared we should haue prDuided additionë
detail Df the leasing efforts and the ouerall retail enuirDnment in Cupertino. We
were not aware this information would be required, and feel it would haue an
impact on the deci.siDn made by the city council."
In reuiewing the uideDtape Df the December 15, 2003 meeting Df the City
Council, Regis HDmes did address their leasing efforts, I n presenting its Dales
proposal, Mark: Kroll, representing Regis HDmes, stated: "Retail has changed.
Retailing is tough business and today it getting tougher. Theater and restauran1
is a cancer eating away at uiability of center. The owner through Heitman has
wDrk:ed hard to lease; spent time and money. City Council and neighbors are
~-IL{
2
familiar with leasing efforts: Andronico's. Also Staples, Best Buy, Trader Joes,
Roberts Marleet, Borders, and Barnes and Nobles.
In addition, a Regis consultant, Lynn Miller of Retail West, stated "space
bacle there un leasable in a retail format. They haue tried for three years. Haue
not been unable to lease those spaces. Changing retail world."
Marie Kroll requested and receiued an opportunity to respond to issues
brought forth during the public comments. He did not feel the need to respond
the public comments regarding leasing at the Dales or the retail enuironment in
Cupertino.
I do question the aboue cited basis for Regis Homes for reconsideration.
Regis Homes has considerable eHpertise in the deuelopmental process.
Regis Homes already discussed their leasing efforts. It is aclenowledged
that there was efforts to lease.
There was not significant discussion of the leasing efforts by the City
Council,
Therefore, in my opinion, Regis Homes has already presented information
about its efforts regarding leasing. I respectfully request that Regis request
for reconsideration be denied.
The City Attorney, Mr. Charles Kilian, has eHpressed seueral legal basis to
deny the reconsideration.
~3~
DarrelLum
7746 Orogrande Place
Cupertino, California
~~Is-
m
'~
~
~
~
'~......,.."
s ' '.
~ '
r
~
0
~
."
~
Q.
Q.
:;:
0>
CO
'~
~
~ -~
;0
<: '"
i
J -
"/
J
3 g
:;ë -
'§
Æ
0
;¡
é5
0>
co
'~
u;
'-
-
,.;:
"
~
~
~
%
'-
'-
0
v. ~
"
0 ~ ~
-' :r: ¿)
v.
- "
'>0 =
~ ;..
co
..-:
z
oó
0
u..
--'
~
'J
0
z
~
w.;
c.
:J
u
r
I
Ch)'
" ,.'
~
'..c::
~;.
~'
0
¡.....
...
..
'"
"
v
c:
'"
.."
~
¡;¿
'"
..c::
¡.....
-""~'~'
-,-,~-
--,_.
.om"vo
ÅaNV'
~ ,
g~i II
.~. [¡iI
~~! . Ii
""<'¡""
.~~ I ::
.;
VIN1!OmVJ 'ONInl3dflJ
"JNI 'VZNV 30 \IllIA
"::JNI 'VIN1!mnV::J N1!3HllION ~O SH'IOH SID31I
IV S3JN30lS31I
3HI
>-
",w
<0.
z<
-u
;;~
GJ~~
"'<~
o.~o.
!
I ~ ' ¡ i
L ~
In¡;
...J
SlJUIHJlIV ~~
S)IVO
jHl
;)þ
'"
:0
C
~
¡ij'9
:;;~
1ií."
'¡ij:-'
.,~
0,)(
-c
:;;
>
'"
"S
0
II>
-'"
'"
'"
u
~
'"
~9
~b
1ií:
I
~:-.
.,~
0,)(
0
~
ro
~~~
¡~ UJ
z" a::
~u
~V'I
]2
H>
~, UJ
!,; I-
V'I
,..g
~';.!
.H
Hi
V,!!¡j
¡lIb, I"'¡
hH! !n:.
1
I
f
! f d.d . ! J i
J 'a.lI ¡ h.li ,
~ ¡¡¡'mi ¡ nul ¡
!!!UÌim ¡ hHi i
II ~
(~,
I
, I.il . I
". - ¡"'II' ¡
i ì I ;HiiUh¡h
! ! dJii'oo¡Jt!
~i"¡D9
p
P
J/ ¡
0 C'::;::)
oC?o 00 0
0 0 0
0 0
00 0
0 09:; 0 00
0 0 0 00 oooocP 0
STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
IV
REGIS HOMES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC
ZONING AMENDMENT AND USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL
OCTOBER 29, 2003
CLIENT
ARCHITECT
REGU! HOMES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC
393 Vintage Pad Drive, Suite 100
Foster City, CA 94404
Tel: (650) 378-2800
Fax: (650) 570-2233
SB ARCHITECI'S (SANDY BABCOCK)
One Beach Street, Suite 301
San Francisco, CA 94133
Tel: (415) 673-8990
Fax: (415) 274-2003
OONSULTANIS
CIVIL ENGINEER
I
.
.
I
I-
I!
1..1.
Kier & Wright Civil Enginecß
& Smvey.... INC.
3350ScottBouJe..rd
Building 22
S- Clam, CA 95054
P&'(4O8)121-<>665
P= (408) 121-5641
Tho GuzzanIo ~
836 Montgomery Street
Son F"",,[,ro, CA 94133
Tot (415)433-4612
Fox, (415) 433-5003
ARBORIST GW!ECHNICALENOINEI'J!. SIRUCI1JRAL ENOtNEER I1<AFFlCCONSULTANT AOOUSTICAL ENGINEER. UNITDESIGN CONSULT^'" FUNG SHUI CONSULT^'"
Hort ScieDoc Treodwoll & Rollo, Inc KPFFENGINEERS Fohr & Poem AHociates Edwmd Pack ODd &.ociateo Tho Eoghmder Company - Golanko
4125 M<WAve. #F 501 141hS- ISO Pacific A."",,, 225 N. Marlœt St, SuIte 200 2117No~Drive 15 North Vma Dc La Luana 33l.ao"""'Comt
PI=aotoo, CA 94566 Oillmd, CA 94612 Son Fraoc[,roo CA 94111 Son ""'" CA95112 Son Iooe, CA 95124 Loguoa Beach, CA 92651 A1mo, CA 94501
Tet(925)484-<J211 Tet (510) 814-4500 P&' (415) 98!/-1OO4 Tot (408) 218-1100 Tet (408)123-8900 Tot (949) 36J.<J500 To!, (949) 363-1)500
Fox, (925) 448.5096 Fox: (510) 814-4501 Fox: (415) 98!/-1552 F",,(408)218-1717 F",,(51O)652-4441
LANDSCAPEARCIIIlECf
SITE
ZONING
USE
BUilDING
DWEWNG
UNITS
PARKING
EMPLOYEES
HOURS OF
OPERATION
THE RESIDENCES AT THE OAKS PROJECT DATA
OAKS AREA SUMMARY
(f)
f-
0
W
f-
I
0
0:::
«
c:::l::::
Co-"::)
Ilulll
1m IIi
""""'A
""""'A""A
e"'LD"" PAD REV","'"
"""mv",.,.
~
~~~,~;;,
, BE"""'"
, BEDROOM
A BE,,-ROOM
"ANDA';;' ,.
"'<S".
'"
"""""E
"""TE
~
""",,,D PA"""" "D
P><MDED .,"'"
"""""'D""'L
""""'" '" EMPLO'ÆES <A"'"
""""'""'Sf,"'S
OTHER AREA
~~~~;;:~¡;~,
sPACE """""""D'
oPEN sP- 'PR<MDED'
EXISTING
="- ACRES
.","- ACRE.
"'E eML D"""
"'E eML D"""
" ""-A>O<ED DW
RETAIL
=-S<OFõ.
~,..r
,."
ø
if
if
Q
,..
""
""'-
".
~~~¡~~~"'"
., LlCENõE~"D""'REõA"CENTE""",o"",p-"'nf"'-'~'
"'.r- "",.,.
PROPOSED RETAIL
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
BUILDING' GROUND FUt "-OOR1 "-00R2 TOTAl.
, .~ ,- "". .þ,"
, "" A.,. Aþ~ '.~
, ,., "'" """ A,-
A .~ '... ,"'. .n
. ... ,""" ,." .,'"
. .,. '""," '-'A .,'"
, ,., '^.. """ A,-
. .~ '... ",.,. .þ,"
, ,~ Aþ'. AA~ ,,~
'" ,~ Aþ'. Aþ~ ',~
" ,., ,= """ A,-
Mþ"...
UNIT TYPE GROUND FUt "-OOR1 "-00R2 TOTAl.
A " .'" ". ""
e " "" "" 'AA"
e ,., """ ,., """
¡..cn]
< of
en ~-~
¡.,:¡ :e OS
u ......,,04 õi g'a
z ~ U....15
¡.,:¡ 0 5 ~~
0 'Ê~U
.... 0", Ô
en zo.S
¡.,:¡ ~ '15 OS 1::
P:: ",s 8-
IT'4 13>8
¡.,:¡ ~ 0
:I: :I:
¡.. E-4 .Q¡
~
seE OM' """"
_cr~L""""
'.",r- """".
NA
i;ð
zO
O<U
"'~
seE OML """"
... OML """"
" ,~, IFLkoeo DE""L"""""
""COMM"""""'~
RETAIL
"'.'DENTIAL
"=
~
,.-
"
",n S<OFõ. ,"""",. OA"""""
.." ,
,----
,." "'"
if
if
"
;>
~
....
11
'"
"
...
3Ø
NOTE, """A ..........,.. DO "" 'NCLCIDE ""RAG..
".
'"
.,.
..
"'"-
if
V"'" eASED ""
"",."""'.,, õO "'"
NA
THE RESIDENCES AT THE OAKS
:: ~. ~.tE~,¡"';:"
, """"'" TENA""" -= MAP
~~M:"'i"'~'"",
CIVil
0' """"~"" ORAD"" "'-AN
Q po."",""", ",em- PLAN
LA~DSCAPE
L-' FREL"'""'" LANDSO.,.. "'-AN
ARCHITECTU!!;\l
A~' AACHIõE= "TE FLAN
""" """DEm"" e<.DO , . .
"'= """D""'... a06 ~ . ..
""" """DEm"" aD<> "',""
""'" """"""'A!. aD<> .. , .,
""" """D"""" aD<> '" , "
.,'" EXŒR"'" BLD<> ELEVA""'"
.,= EXTE""", BL06 ELEvA"""
.,'" EXTE","" BLD6 ELEv"",,'
.", ,,""D"" """"""
...'" """D"""" "'" A
;:1:;~:=:~~::~
INDEX AND
PROJECT DATA
""'" EX<E"'"" DE"",
A",,"'TEO,""" "..,.. eo"""
"""",",0""" DRAW""
"""""""""" DRAW""
",,""'"'0""" D"",,""
"""",",""""D"",,""
~n --
"""'~~
-~ "'A.
~ ~~
~ -........., -
~.~-~~ .~
~.~-~~ .-
~._-~~ -,
~.~ ~~~-
TRANSPORTATION
.-, M""" AVÐ<Æ FI'OFOOED ,,"""" ""'"
AO.O1
~
. I ~
~ ,
¡¡ ~
~ ~
"d
I ¡ ~
!, ~
~ i~ i
z " ,
~i
~ n ~
I H U
I h ~~
~ n~ i~
g .§: h
~ B > '.
~ ~U~,
i ~ ~~
~ ~~
~ .~
I
I
I
: @ I
I
I
I
!" ~
'110. " I~
I
'>9<-1ZL '" xv, >0"6 '1""J1l'~ OJ"~ '\"'5 ~ VI"""""
599l>-at(",) ""!PII"' 'P"^'I'" n"5 om .
'~NI 'S~OA3A~nS ~ S~33NIÐN3 lI^I~
lHÐI~M ~ ~31>1
j ~
" " ! i
b, § f Î~~ ~ .
f .Ë ~~ {'I l 1;
ifa11 i;Í.H H :1
!l~¡j i :n~'- b '1
l~H~! ~I~!ï, ~I h
~, ,]; !.)!¡ ï. -,
,X¡,! J ~,.., " .,
0",_, _..:!~~!. ~1
'10' ~ 'J,.h- ï" l
~!l~; , l~i:i d tii
¡¡~!ll, h~!Ir¡~' ,I
h~h .~ !!'O'U ,,~ ,H
I~ ~; ~;' 0 i!~:! ~h ¡i~
u!¡' .1 .h"'i lOj ~io
, 'ê "'Hi 1'1!'
~ ~~ ¡HUh ~¡. 'ill
~ ,futh ~;l ~h
~ ~~
.~ J
IIII
nil
]~~I
'ON'" """
'JNI 'VIN~O.JI1VJ N~3Kl~ON,O S3~OH SIÐ3~ :~O.J
dVI'I1OWl 3AUVlN31 ÐNI1S3A
,.",,"' ¡ ~!. i
( 1...-
!IUd
~j
.
I
r
i
I
II
!
i
~ !
"
'I
,I
I
'I
I 'i
I :1
, II
Ii
II
I'li
-I II
q
.r II
t~ III
I II
I I:
I
'I
'I
, ":
'I
:1
,I
.1,.-: I
.: I
II
[,
I:
I',
0
C\...
g~
z~
C\~
...'"
s;:-<
z
REGIS HOMES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA. INc.
VILLA DE ANZA. INc.
CUPERTINO. CALIFORNIA
THE RESIDENCES AT
THE
OAKS
~
~
""
("
1~
,-<
~
~
m
--¡------
~ ~
; : ~!
I -- Š_)
: I
r '
¡
~
I 'I
~ I,
I, I '
i3D'.. ~I.-
I ¡..
I 11
; i ,1
~ "
--L_-~----Ll
~o
. .
~~V
~ .
.
u~~
'ri~
id!
Ifl'g
"
ü
II'
~~ ARCHITECTS
SANDY
IlABCQCK
.,--
~_..,.
m..,,-
:::=...
::::.:::--
=
:,~~
,,~o~m
ÁGNYS
~II
'"
;,
~ n
iiîi
.!'~
ffi"il
-511
VlN1l.0mVJ 'ONlDBdflJ
'JNI 'VZNY gO V11lA
'JNl 'VlN1l.0mVJ N1I.mDlON m SgWOH SIÐnI
S)lV 0 3: H l
gHl
N
U
Sl.::H:.lIH:J1IV ~~
.~
. <
"': ¡
!
!
,.
¡¿
0
-------
----------
---------------
------ .
- .--,--------.: .- -
,/ .,-'
@:?
,---- ~~
~ "'V>
~~
'ID
¡¡¡
n
¡¡¡
ID
,..
<XI
0
t:
iõ
¡jj
a.
~
@:?
" g.
~;;
" ..
q~
'!.;:!
~
::I
, t:
ID
'8
¡¡" I ~~.
!III [~8
.1 r~
~~ ARCHITECTS
~~:
SANDY =
BABCOCK
--.
--
-
aæ~
.......
'~O~8'8
"ON'S
e¡woJ!(B;) 'o1f!1JQdn;)
':!UJ 'IIZUV QG limA
':!UJ 'u¡woJ!(B;) UJQq¡.I°N Jo SQUJoH s¡2Q}i
~HH
! ""
U~!IIIII
!oJI!!
~ihiiiii
SlJ::I1IHJtJ\i ~~
S)JVO
tlH.L
~~z
ð¡¡;~
J.V SH;)NHGISH}i HH.L
;~:~:~~~~:~~:~~~:==:~~~:~ ¡ --
i
'/ I i
}
~
z
0
:>
~
,§;
"I'....J
,i c:;¡
i ¡ ::¿
:ii:J:j
II c:.::
\IU
"
I' U"1
135
I>
, UJ
:1-'-
IV">
I-~
¡~
, ,=>
:==:-'¡~
i i¡;¡
1:1:1
u
öl
öl
I;t
I! I
.-
0
,....:
! .(
i
,/
1 I
I
lr
, i
i
, I
Ii
, I
I!
'I~ i
I ,"- ~
I~ ~
If:
,
i I
lie
: í
~ ií ¡;
, '
i
! ,
i !
! ~
q"
z
'"'
~
~
;;a
::q
~
""
~
4Ø'-ø"
I~
~
~
!
~
~
I~
~
I~
..
~
I~
I~
å
~ i
s
f..-ø'
4Ø'-Ø"
:':i
~
3&'-ø"
~
I~
~
~
q
I!
~
~
I~
..
~
~~
<6
t?;
~
~
ø
~
""
~
THE RE
SIDENCES AT
Re; H:!e~f No£rn ~WID K . S
Villa ~e Anza, Inc. orma, Inc.
Cupertino, California
~~ ARCHITECTS
SANDY
IIAIICOCK
~
=:---
~I~
, 6
~
~
::D
,.
~
8
,.
~
I
~i
0
N
L"
4I'.ø"
".J
,"'-ø"
I~
I~
I~
I~
IIPqp ~8;¡J~!;
w- . i ,^,.~g
wl'~n ~~
III ¡~ i m
mi R'
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
!~
qj
~
~
::D
¡:¡
8
,.
~
í
,"'-ø"
,'-ø"í
w-ø'
I~
I~
I~
THE RESIDENCES AT
THE OAKS
~
~
~ I~
" ~
~ .-
, ~
~
~
~
~~ I ARCHITECTS
Regis Homes of Northern California, Inc.
Villa De Anza, Inc,
Cupertino, California
SANDY
IIAJICOCK
==.,.
~:=
-
:=--
!í!!!
'Ej
z
C"¡
~
56
:q
~
""
~
i
~ ¡
0
w
í 3'-6 In"
41'-6112"
3'-Ø" í
W-ø"
I~
I~
I~ '
!IIðqp ~~~¡;
iii' '¡ "'~~§
IIIli~g¡ ~,~Ô
'" i ~'"
!!i~ X
~
~
~ "
" ~
. ~
"
~
~
~ I~
~í!!!
q;
z
C"¡
~
..
~
::0
11\
~
~
,"'-ø"
O'-ø" 3'-Ø"
I~
I~
I~
THE RESIDENCES AT
THE OAKS
~
~
~
"
~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~~ ARCHITECTS
Regis Homes of Northern California. Inc.
Villa De Anza, Inc.
Cupertino, California
SANDY
!lABCOCK
~=~
:::-=.."':...
=--
¡
~I
0
.þ.
I~
I!
l~
~I~
~6
z
C)
..
'"
~
¡;¡;
~
8
""
~
f,'-ø"
4Ø'-Ø"
,'-ø,1 o'-ø"
,"'-ø"
I!
l~
I~
Im!~H~ ~~~~
nn' "I v>Z~§
!!1!1'~1i ~~tí
lIB H i ~~
UHi
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
"
':
~
~
~
~I~
'6
z
C)
~
:c
!'!3
8
""
~
í />'-ø"
4Ø'-Ø"
,'-ø"í
,"'-ø'
I~
I~
I~
l~
THE RESIDENCES AT
THE OAKS
Regis Homes of Northern California, Inc.
Villa De Anza, Inc.
Cupertino, California
~
¡;:
~
~
~
~
"
':
~
~
~
~~IARCHITECTS
SANDY
BABCOCK
==...
==-
:=--
I~
I~
I~
~~
'6
z
C>
~
i
I
i
;
»1
""
0
U'1
í
'8'..",
,.J
50'..,"
..
~
~
~
~
~
,
,
,
~
~
¡;¡;
~
~~
'6
~ Ic
~ ~
¡¡¡ (ì
~
~
""
~
~
~
Im!~p~ ~RoZ~
UU; .: ~~~6
m!~ I z~z
!iII Hgl gt
i!H~ '"
L.",
4"'.,,"
>0'-""
I~
I~
I~
I~
I~
THE RESIDENCES AT
THE OAKS
Regis Homes of Northern California Ine
Villa De Anza, Ine. ,.
Cupertino, California
J
8'-""
11'..",
""
~
..
~
~
~
~
~
~
..
~
::¡
~
~
~
;;
'-'
~~ ARCHITECTS
SANDY
BABCOCK
~
=---
=
-
...... ..
...:'5:
"°008.8
AON.S
S1J31IH::Jdlf ~~
1!)1lI0J111!:) 'ouwedn;)
.~ur 'mI\f ;aUffiA
.our 'U¡WOJ!IB;) w;t¡1J°N Jo s;woH ~;1!
S)lVO g:H~
~V SH;)NHOISH1! HH.L
z
0
....
<
>
, ,,
...A
W
r ."
~
l
z
0
~
~
~
~
C.;>
z
~~
¡in
.~. I
~
OJ>
z
~~2
~~~
8",....
z
0
....
<
>
W
...A
W
~ Z
0
< ~
w ~
~ ~
~
C.;>
N ~
9~
~B
0
z
~
z!;>
- -
011
...A~
-::
~~
šiH
I ~ Hi
U'-Im
I. .m
ŠUãiW
,...
0
M
1<
ï
J~ '
~~ ~
~c
li'
c,
~.
. g¡
z
C)
~ '
j!;
.1ft
~
m
S
I ~ I
i~ .
~~ .
. III
~ '
III,
¡
I
i
ENCES AT
THE RESID A K S
THE 0 California, Inc,
of Northem
Regt's Homes D Anza Inc.
Villa e .' ,
Cupertino. CalifOrnIa
~
..~š
:CO~1IV'a
AQNY$
IIJ1LIOJ!re;) 'OU]1J;¡dn;)
'0111 '1!zuy :!Q limA
'0°1 'IIJ1LIO.Jf(1!;) UJ:!Ij1.I°N Jo s:!UJoH s¡g:!~
S.L:>:l.LIH:mv ~~
S)lVO 3H.L
.L v SH;)NHOISH~ HH.L
2
l .
~
,
. .
,
R
/-
I
0
[[J;
~
v~p'
c=J
; ~
R .
i
! '
!
~..
šH
! .; II
Ii! U~'~1i
<~"'" ! ;11
~d5~~ ~~h:ii
5
.t
!<
!
~
~
~
ð~
~
..
0
ê
¡in
c:k
~
B!
§
~
~
!Q ~
c:k
~
~
Q
z
8~
~,
¡
:> i
:l>-
e
N
!!!SIP ~;o8~~
'I' 'e V> ,.
'! I "'C)oo
!!i.,g¡ 0
II a~ i
H~
~~
¡ 0
z
0
~
~
i
d
~ ~
q:3
z
0
8
'"
~
~'"
.~
8
,.
~
~~
¡;;¡
8
,.
~
~ ~
,
~ ~
,
~ ~
1
¡ ~
; "
¡ \
~ ¡
§
r ----- -- - - - --- -- ----- -;
i i
~= == == === = ==1= = == === == ~
: :
I I
l- -- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- m - j
~ ~
I
THE RESIDENCES AT
THE OAKS
Regis Homes of Northern California. Inc.
Villa De Anza, Inc.
Cupertino, California
,
. \
;
~~ ARCHITECTS
SANDY
BABCOCK
~=~
==--
--
.--
--.
-=.:
-==
"''O''"""
ÃUNVS
n::>UIH::>1lV ~~
~ ~
.
llJUl°J!11';) '01I!ll~dn;)
"'UJ '1mIV ~a limA
"'UJ '"eJUloJl. 1!;) w~t[lJ°N Jo s:!woH s¡8:JlI
S)lVO tIHl
~V S'il;)N'ilQIS'illI 'ilH~
.
~
;
1 ¡--n_~:~__-¡ 1 .~~-, ri
~
! ~'- r m 1 ~
~~-,-- i i;
E':".'" l ---I-nnn_--_J
, nun
'T ¡mnun mnnm-¡
I 'Î' ,
-+1 i i
r 'm! lmm_mnmn_mL
"
~
. ~
I ¡_mn__-_-¡
I .~~-" rl
-~
~
. ~
,n_-___n_nn---nn,
i ::::: -: ::1 :::::::c:::i
j i
lnn_--_nn______n_,J_,
.
"
,
I
"
"'
~
[Jlo
oQ;Q
! ~
.
o.
1
[ü0
rnn--_nn,
, ,
~
[II E
~
,
. !
~ : i
l_~-.-
.
.
~
1 ~
: ~
--_J
in
! ~I II
u~ U~'lu
t::~8~ I. ¡II
~æd ~Uhii
M
0
.,¡'
1<
!
3
"-
S
t::!
~ ì
~
~
~
~
t;I
~ ¡
~
~
t¡;P
'" ¡
~
..
8
~
0
Z
~¡
.~,¿~--
/.7~r '.
rW //,/,- /" .
////
VIEW FROM FREEWAY ENTRANCE
CUPERTINO,
CALIFORNIA
Regis Homes of Northern California
Heirl11an Capital Management
~~I ¡\RCH ¡TECTS
"
ì
;:¡-
~
Z
u:¡
Vi
~
~
u:¡
:3
~
;,¿
~
U
:",'
'-".i
f-
(,..
~/
;(
~
~
UJ
Z
u:¡
~
CI)
::E
ê
;3:
u:¡
;>
oj
.;:;
~
-;;: ~
u u
" E
~ ~
..t: oj
~ "
~i
.....-;;:
0 .~
~ p..
u oj
8 u
0 "
:r: ~
~e
~:r
<C
z
ç¿
O.
u...
-1
«
u
0
Z
¡....
ç¿
u.¡
~
:::J
u
~
1. SIGNING AND sn<J'!NG D"~LS """- CDN'ORW TO ""-UW<; ST"""""
SPEaFICATIONS "" STANDARD PlANS "lID uv """.
~
,
DErAIL 39A
87
87
Parking Spaces Removed
Porking Spoces Installed
o~
I
8-1
dtlNõ
~'i
;I~
REVISIONS
DESCRlf'I1ON
fþ FEHR & PEERS ASSOCIATES, INC.
Tro,"portatiDn CD,",ltanu
=~...,,'"... oR_,CA
1:&~1~>1D :~;g~y. Uf
Dooi,o""",--'IfA
""'"""~
Choo1<od"'-
Dol. Do""'", '" '01"
""'æ~
""'"'"11 No..
CITY OF CUPERTINO
MARY AVENUE
PROPOSED STRIPING PLAN
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
FAX (~08) 777-3333
CITY 0
CUPEIQ1NO
Community Development Department
SUMMARY
AGENDA No.l
AGENDA DATE March 1. 2004
SUMMARY:
Planning Commission work program for 2004
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends approval of:
1. The 2004 Work Program
BACKGROUND:
Until the last two years, the Planning Commission and City Council approved an
annual planning work program. The approval was suspended for the last two
years due to the workload of the General Plan. The General Plan may be
approved this summer, so it is appropriate to consider this year's work program.
DISCUSSION:
2004 Work Program
The proposed Work Program is enclosed. It is based, for the most part, on
adopted City Council goals. Additional projects are those initiated by staff and
private developers.
To summarize the main projects:
City Council Goals
General Plan: Streetscape plan for Crossroads, policies to promote economic
development including transportation implicationsr adoption of General Plan
Process Valko use permit
Complete Monta Vista annexation
Locate a park in the Valko area
Planning Projects
Rl Ordinance Review
Parking Ordinance Review
Monta Vista Neighborhood Planning Project
Fence Ordinance Review
Wireless Master Plan ordinance
Pdnted on Recycled Paper
1-1
2
Private Projects
. Oaks
Adobe Inn
Possible mixed use on "Barry Swenson" property
. Valko (as mentioned in Council Goals section)
The Planning Commission discussed the work program at its February 23, 2004
meeting and recommends approval.
Exhibits:
2004 Planning Commission Work Program
Prepared by: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner
Approved by:
Steve Piasec .
Director of Community Development
G:plamring/ ee/ cc2004 work program
gæ
David W. Knapp
City Manager
7-2-
2004 PLANNING COMMISSION WORK PROGRAM
CITY COUNCIL GOALS 2004 HOW IMPLEMENTED WHEN
IMPLEMENTED
Pursue "Downtown" Opportunities - . Authorize through the adoption of the . Summer 2004
Develop a Streetscape plan for the proposed General Plan policies. Bring
Crossroads back the detailed plan back after adoption
of the General Plan.
. Street Safety - Walkable Community - . Incorporate in development projects . Ongoing
Ensure that "walkable city" concept is
present in all city
development/ redevelopment projects
. Neighborhood Park in the Homestead . Work with potential developers of the . Not scheduled
Area Villa Serra project to provide a
This area was identified during the neighborhood park in this area.
General Plan process as an area deficient
in neighborhood parks.
. Vallco Neighborhood Park . Work with the Valko and Hewlett . Not scheduled
This area was identified during the General Packard developers to locate a
Plan process as an area deficient in neighborhood park in this area.
neighborhood parks.
-.J
\
~
CITY COUNCIL GOALS 2004 HOW IMPLEMENTED WHEN
IMPLEMENTED
. Economic Development - . Include policies in amended General . Add this to the
. Encourage, retain and support healthy Plan that encourage active commercial draft as a new
environment for retail growth uses such as bookstores, coffee shops and policy - Summer
restaurants. 2004
. Consider development of new projects . Ongoing
that include retail space, either free-
standing or mixed use
. Identify Big Box sites
. V ALLCO Fashion Park Redevelopment . Process use permits proposed by . Spring 2004
property owners, related to potential
cinema and long-range master plan. May
entail amendment or removal of
revelopment agreement.
. Actively seek desired tenants for Valko . Ongoing
and other commercial centers, such as a
bookstore and other uses described above
. Add revenue enhancement policy . Include an economic assessment of . Ongoing
component of review for new potential revenue generations possibilities
development for major projects
. Consider thresholds of retail to retain in
shopping centers
. Evaluate transit/ transportation . Analyze transportation implications in . Summer 2004
implications of economic development the General Plan, and in the and ongoing
strategy environmental review of major
development projects.
--J
\
..-c
2
......J
I
~
CITY COUNCIL GOALS 2004 HOW IMPLEMENTED WHEN
IMPLEMENTED
. General Plan Update . Authorize and release public hearing . Spring/Summer
draft and environmental impact report, 2004
hold public hearings, adopt plan
. Mfordable Housing - . BMR program . Ongoing
. Provide housing opportunities for
Cupertino workers
. Teacher Housing assistance programs . Contract with Neighborhood Housing . Contract
Services of Silicon Valley to implement the complete. Teacher
teacher outreach program assistance
provided Spring (2
loans) and Fall
2004 (2 loans)
. Annexation - . Initiate and complete annexation . February 2004
. Monta Vista procedure . Ongoing
. Creston . Annex individual contiguous parcels
when redevelopment occurs
3
----.)
I
<S"'-
PLANNING PROJECTS
. Rl Ordinance Review . Review and amend R-l ordinance to . Winter/Spring
make process and non-process changes 2004
. Parking Ordinance Review . Review and amend parking ordinance . Winter 2004
. Nexus Study . Complete a nexus study to determine the . Summer 2004
appropriate housing mitigation for new
development
. Fee Study . Conduct a fee study to determine . March 2004
appropriate development fees, and amend
fee schedule as needed
. Traffic Consultant Contract . Contract with a traffic consultant to . Spring 2004
prepare traffic studies on development
projects
. Monta Vista Neighborhood Planning . Work with Monta Vista neighborhood to . Summer/Fall
Project prepare a neighborhood plan 2004
. Rel'Jlart Creek Trail . Prepare CEQA documents .
. Fence Ordinance Review . Make corner vision triangle consistent . Summer 2004
with public works standard detail
. Wireless Master Plan . Update zoning ordinance to be . Summer 2004
consistent with new wireless master plan
PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS
. Civic Park . ASA for residential component of the . Spring 2004
master plan (R-l building); ASA for
previously approved
condominiums/retail (R-2 building)
. Oaks . Process use permit for modifications at . Pending
the Oaks Shopping Center
. Adobe Inn . Use Permit for mixed use . Spring 2004
retail/ residential
. BJ's . Amend use permit re: valet parking . Spring 2004
. "Barry Swenson" site (narrow lot with . Use permit for possible mixed use, . Spring 2004
vacant house next to affordable housing commercial/ residential
project on east Stevens Creek Blvd.) G:p1amUngjmisc/2004 Planning Commission Work Program
4
EXHIBITS
BEGIN
HERE
The Honorab]e Sandra James, Mayor
and Honorable City Council Members
City of Cupertino
]0300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 950]4
EXHIBIT
Œ3( d oLf
March I, 2004
RE: General Plan Taskforce Recommendation and Minority Report
Dear Mayor James and Honorab]e Members of the Cupertino City Council:
As individuals on the Housing Commission we would like our views heard as to the General
Plan proposed by the General Plan Task Force.
We all feel strongly that the original Genera] Plan is a better model for the future health of
Cupertino. We believe that it is important for there to be diversity in all areas of the city. The
restrictions proposed do not take into consideration the differing areas of the city, thus limiting
growth in the areas of business, affordable housing and mixed use projects.
The new General Plan would be a financialliabi]ity for Cupertino. We have seen a reduction in
the revenue recently the same as the rest of the State, but with the fiscally responsible
government body of Cupertino we have managed to maintain our current level of services. The
new plan would discourage new and existing business thus decreasing revenue even more. A
further decline in revenue will affect the schools and public services. These are the things that
make Cupertino such a desirable place to live and keep home values high.
The housing segment of the new General Plan would eliminate the affordable housing program
and restrict growth in general. This limits the housing for those individuals who help make
our community what it is today, our teachers and public employees. Ifwe are unduly restrictive
in our plan developers will go elsewhere and everyone will lose.
Signed By,
Frances Seward
Kim Dovel
Mahesh Nibalani
Richard Abdalah
Sarah Hathaway-Feit
~ Santa Clara County Housing Action Coalition Qiil:lhmiiA.
The Santa Clara County Hou,;ng AcUon CoalWon ;, compri,ed of a broad "nge of organ;,aUon, and ;ndMdual, who ha,a,
" a common goal, tho ,¡,¡on of affOrdabla, well.con,tructad and appropriately located hou,¡ng
February 27, 2004
City Council & Planning Commission
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
EXHIBIT
Ct- 31\( DY
Dear City Council and Planning Commission,
On behalf of the Housing Action Coalition of Santa Clara County we are writing to convey our
thoughts about the proposed general plan update.
By way of reference, the Housing Action Coalition includes more than 100 organizations and
individuals, Its goal is the production of well-built, appropriately-located homes that are
affordable to families and workers in Silicon Valley. Organizations participating in the HAC
include the Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group, the Home Builders Association, Greenbelt
Alliance, the Sierra Club, the League of Women Voters, Santa Clara County Association of
Realtors, Tri-County Apartment Association, and Santa Clara County School Boards Association.
Cupertino is a wonderful place to live and work. It boasts some of the best schools in the nation
and is incredibly diverse. Unfortunately, despite Cupertino's best efforts to build homes, housing
construction has not kept pace with job growth- 6 jobs were created for every I home built
between 1995-2000 according to the Santa Clara County Planning Office. Regarding housing
construction, the most complete data we feel is available is the last housing element cycle.
Cupertino's perfonnance during this period is useful in highlighting historic rates of housing
production as well as the types of homes built. Below is a chart that shows how Cupertino fared
in meeting its regional fair share requirement:
Housine Element Cvcle, 1989-1998
Income Level Needed Built
Verv Low 508 97
Low 444 52
Moderate 635 4
Above Moderate 1587 2114
Total 3174 2267
This chart shows that Cupertino underperfonned in the area of affordable housing while
exceeding the need for above moderate housing. We feel this is an important piece of contextual
infonnation as the Council and Planning Commission revise the General Plan and Housing
Element.
In reading through the Majority Report's Draft General Plan, we have some concerns we would
like to highlight. And, since we are the Housing Action Coalition, we focus on the Housing
Element section of the General Plan while being fully aware of the City's assets- schools,
libraries, and other community services.
Housing Action Coolition, 224 Airport Parkway, Suite 620, San Jose, CA 95110
THE
VOICE OF
AFFORDABLE
HOUSING
SINCE 1979
.."'of."'CTO"
P~,'d,",
D'""" L,'or
Sooth CO'"'y Ho",I",
Vi" P",ld"YS""t",
V".."A,o,""o
Mmy Ho",'", C,IIfor""
T~,,"~,
D°" F,Ik
T,"d..'o" N",hOo,hood
D",'opm,"' Corpo~lIo"
Chr', Blo,'
Ch"m.. Ho",I",
O",'opm,"1 Corpo~lI""
Ch..m,'",C,rt'o
C,rtlo'P"I"".
D",'opm,"'. ,",.
..."",...
...'B'yAol," Lo,,'
D""opm,"' Corpo~lIo"
Joh" Low"
B,,',"' Ho",I",
D",'opm,"' Corpor"'o"
LI"d..,"doll"'
'd," Ho",I",. '""
y..O"'" S!"tord
y""",,, St,"tord
Co""III",
All" T",o"
Comm"""y ',o"oml". '""
NPHOT..'
D'".. J. Sp"",",
.""11,, DI~oto'
Do" Sho'm.'..
PolI,y , Pro,~m D'r,,'or
...to T,dmrthy
PolI,y , Pro",m A..o,',"
TI.. T. D,o",
Comm""',,""o' R..oo~
D",'opm,"' O",otor
.""",Slo",
O",'opm," 0",..
C,.." KI""
Adm'""'"II" A..",,",
Am"Hol.
Boo""p"
NPH ..FlCI
369 Pine Street
Suite 350
San Francisco
CA 94104
415.989.6160 Tel
415.989.8166 Fax
nonproflthousing.org
February 27, 2004
C-L3/lloy
~~f:<;[ V ED
MAR 0 1 ZDD4
BY:
City Council & Planning Commission
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Dear City Council and Planning Commission,
On behalf of the Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California, we are
writing to convey our thoughts about the proposed general plan update. The
membership of NPH, currently about 500, draws together the main public, private,
and non-profit partners active in the creation and support of affordable housing for
low-income people in Northern California.
We are deeply concerned about the proposed changes to the City's General Plan and
Housing Element. From our perspective, Cupertino has yet to come close to
addressing its affordable housing needs. As the chart below indicates, from 1989-98,
Cupertino met oIÙyl6% of the housing needed for lower-income people, while
exceeding the need for above moderate housing.
Housine: Element Cvc1e, 1989-1998
Income Level Needed Built
VervLow 508 97
Low 444 52
Moderate 635 4
Above Moderate 1587 2114
Total 3174 2267
Housing Element
The Housing Element section continues to express excellent policy goals and programs
that we believe are crucial to addressing the need for affordable housing. Specifically,
we commend Cupertino for deciding to use 25% of its RDA housing funds for
affordable housing.
However, we are very concerned with the following changes in the Housing Element:
1. We are concerned with the section that reads:
"After adjusting for the housing units already provided between 1999-2001, the
revised estimate is that adequate sites are needed for 2,325 units from 2001-2006
or 465 units per year. As the jobs/housing balance seems to have shifted, this
~~~~HIBIT
(L 3l\[ b~
Community F OnTI & Housing
Background
Proposed changes to General Plan
are based on Task Fòrce responses
to questions
Major Issues
. Street width
. Commercial development
. Residential development
. Mixed use
. Affordable housing
. Housing densities
. Building heights
. Jobs/Housing balance
. Economic development
CIty of Cupertino Imft Go"",,1 PIon
Connmmity FonnIHounmg ""rion
m
;~
Questions
. Should the City consider reducing the
number of through traffic lanes by parking
them to parking lanes, sidewalks or medians
(also relates to other streets besides Stevens
Creek Boulevard) Y14 N34
. Should the development allocation (amount
of commercial, office, hotel and residential
development) slightly decrease the potential
commercial and office development and
increase residential potential? Y8 N35
ðl\
;;¡j f
3
City ofCuportino D"ft G,ne,,1 PI,n
Co...unity FonnIHo",ing ",rion
Questions
. Should the jobs/housing balance be
improved? Y17 N26
. Should the Crossroads area be a pedestrian-
oriented shopping district with mixed use
along Stevens Creek Boulevard, between De
Anza Boulevard and Stelling Road? Yl8 N25
. Should the Vallco Park South area be a mixed-use
commercial area with regional commercial, office
and entertainment center with supporting higher
density residential development? Y20 N23 JII.
CityofCoportinoImftG,n",IPI,n ~
Co...unity FonnIHo",ing ",rion 4
2
Questions
. Should the heights be the same as the
existing General Plan, except with the
proposed changes of 30 feet adjacent to
resident uses, and gateway areas instead of
landmark buildings (60+ feet) Y25 NI2
City of Cupertino Imft Ge"",,1 Pl,n
Connnnnity FormIHouoing section
Æ\,
..
5
Questions
. Should developers be required to build smaller
more affordable units in order to provide a range
of housing types? Y31 Nl2
. Should the city continue to encourage the
development of affordable housing? Y27 N 16
. Should housing developers of 10 units and above
provide 15% below market rate units based on the
actual number of new units built, not based on the
net number of new units provided. Y28 NIO
City of Cupertino ImftGe","'¡ Plan
CommomityFonnIHouoing ",rion
~
..
6
3
Questions
. Development Allocation:
- Residential units: Should the general plan
allow for 4,614 new units? Y9 N22
- Hotel Rooms: 1,067 new rooms? Yl2 Nl7
- Office/Industrial: Should the general plan
allow for 994,693 additional square feet? Yl2
Nl9
- Commercial/retail: Should the general Plan
allow for 856,710 additional square feet? Yl9
Nl2
City orCup"'inc D"ft G,no,,1 PI,n
Connnonity Fonn'Hc",ing ""icn
Questions
. Jobs/Housing Balance:
- Should housing be added if the resultant student
population cannot attend Cupertino schools?
Y5 N24
- Should housing be added if they cannot attend
their neighborhood schools? Y8 N21
- Should the developers for all major new or
renovated office or industrial development be
required to include housing at a ratio of two
dwelling units per 1000 square feet of new
building area? Y3 N26
City crCcpertino D"ftG"",,¡P¡,n
CcmmwÜty Fcnn'Hc",ing ",clion
4
Questions
- Should the jobslhousing imbalance be improved at the
expense of economic health in Cupertino? YO N24
- Should major developments be allowed that would
increase the jobs/housing imbalance, requiring more
housing to be added? Y8 N16
- Should the general plan require a periodic review of the
data used to establish ABAG housing requirements, to
confinn the accuracy of the detenninations, and to
make sure the requirements reflect changes in the
jobs/housing balance caused by changing economic
conditions? Y17 N12
City ofC""".;oo iliaft G,.....! Pl,o
Convnooity FonnIHoosing ",noo
Questions
. Crossroads Area:
- Should residential uses be introduced into the
Crossroads area? YII Nl8
- If so, should the housing density in that area
and elsewhere along Stevens Creek Blvd. all be
at 35 dwelling units per acre? YlO Nl9
- Should buildings in the Crossroads area exceed
30 feet plate height (where the roof pitch
begins) and 36 feet total height? Y16 N13
City ofC""","", Dmft G,.....! Pl,n
CommunityFonnIHoosing ",noo
10
5
Questions
. Building Height~. \ .\-
Ð bO ~
- Should heights¡þ allowed at Stelling and
Homestead? Y6 N24
- Should height exceptions be allowed in the
"Heart of the City" area? 60 feet for
apartments/condos near YIO N21
- Should heights in excess of 60 feet be allowed
anywhere in the city? Y9 N21
äL
;;;i f
11
CityofCu",rtino D",OO'n",1 PIon
Community FonnIHoming "ctioo
Questions
- Should 45 foot heights be allowed along
Prospect, Rainbow, Stelling and the others
listed in item one and outlined in dark blue on
the height map? Y9 N20
City ofCuportino 0",0 0""",1 PIon
Community Fonn/Homing ",non
12
6
Questions
. Other Housing Density Issues
- Should housing be developed on Homestead near
Stelling at 50 dwelling units per acre? Y6 N24
- Should housing be developed in the North De Anza and
Bubb Road areas at 35 dwelling units per acre?
DeAnza Y9 N17
- Should the City Center area be enhanced as a large
scale high density mixed use district? Y13 N19
CityorC"",rtinoDrnftG""""IPI,n
Cemmumty FonnIHew;ing ",.en
13
Questions
- Should mixed use developments be encouraged
throughout the city or mainly in the urban
areas? Yl4 Nl8
- Should higher density housing and mixed use
projects be encouraged along our main streets
(Stelling, Prospect, Homestead, see list in first
question) Yll Nl8
City erC"",rti.e Drnft Gon=1 PI,.
Cemmnoity FennIHew;ing ",.en
~
:ill
14
7
Questions
. Design Review:
- Should a resident's Architectural and Site
Review Committee be reestablished in addition
to the design review subcommittee of the
Planning Commission to get input fTom
residents on new city projects, and to make the
development process more public before
building designs are finally approved? Yl9
Nl3
m\
;;.¡,j¡ I
15
City ofC_mno Dm' Gm,," PI..
Community Fonn/Ho",iog "",ion
Questions
. View Issues:
- Should the general plan include incentives for
developers who protect views of the hillsides
for the residents who don't live in the hills to
enjoy? Y21 NIO
. Parks
- Should the general plan encourage pocket parks
by reducing the 3.5 acre park minimum size?
Y25 N7
~
16
City ofCup'mno Dm' Gen",,1 PI,n
Community FonnIHo",ing ""tion
8
Questions
. Economic Issues:
- Should the general plan seek to have the city
annex the Hanson quarry for utility tax
revenue? Yl8 N7
- Should the general plan designate certain zones
to be strictly commerciaVretail to maximize
sales tax revenues? (Ex. North and South
Vallco area; the Oaks area) Yl7 N8
City ofC"J"'Ûno 1m. Gon'ŒI PI,n
Community FomVIIousmg ""tion
"
17
General Plan Changes
Add to the general plan:
Consider pocket parks in new and renovated commercial and in
new residential developments for respite and gathering places.
(policy 2-72)
View Preservation
Devise and implement a policy to encourage developers to limit
building heights in order to preserve hillside views throughout the
city. (policy 2-44 Strategy 3)
Since the quality of Cupertino schools (elementary and high
school) is a primary asset of the city, care shall be taken to ensure
that any new housing will not adversely impact these systems.
(policy
2-19. Strategy 2)
Chy ofCup<tûno 1m. G'~ŒI PI"
Comm..,i'y Fonn'llousin. ",tion
18
9
Concept change
Developers who develop housing of 10 units and above must provide
15% below market rate units based 00 the actual number of new units
built, ootbased on the net number of new units provided.
Delete from the General Plan the following:
Based on the fact that the city during the pasl decade has added an
average of200 unilS per year to the housing stock, this 5 year goal (of
465 units per year) will need to be aggressively pursued between 2001-
2006. {It was thought such fi'enzied building would impact schools and
traffic and lower quality of life in Cupertino.}
City ofC"",rtino Omft Go"",l PI.o
Commoni'y FonnIHo",ing "olioo
19
Development Allocation
Dev. type 2000 Existing Admin. Task
Built GP Draft GP Force
Draft
Comm. 3,317,426 4,431,000 4,174,136 4,431,000
Off/Ind. 8,325,312 9,428,000 9,320,005 9,320,005
Hotel 441 1,027 1,578 1,429*
rooms
Res. 20,032 22,369 24,647 22,369
units -,
'Tho,: iopipolinop"" tho v.noo n~\J
City ofc"",rtino Omft Gon= Plan
Commonity FonnlHo",iog ,oolion
potoOb.,
~
20
10
Development Allocation
Table 2-A
Tobt,M_m""AIJ"""&
Nd,bbomood Co.m,"""(",'.) om..(,..tL) &"'("0.0) RaldooU.ltDU)
"DO BuD< Bulldo.. "" BuD< Bulldo.. "DO Bulb BuDdo.. "" BuD< Bundo..
",816 99,698 416,557 "',210 760 90'
. rn rn
220 220
17,376 1B,307
M"..V;,..
O"'Vd",
F.....~
O"~"""
Co.mon'.' C......
HootufC", 1,1B',"6
VoilroSo'" 1,110,700
Ho"""oodUd 238,73'
"'b~""" "',576
Emp""""C"'~
NIkA=BI,' ",'"
C<,C""~ 29,358
VoilroNorth 127,806
B,hbRood
C"""d' 3.17-'6
1,"',11' 51O,'" 521,987
1,"',700 708,057 1,091,'"
1",678 69,550 69,550 126
"','" 268,735 "°,604
51,'" ',048,021 ','66,'06
",Oil 1,032,072 1,1",'"
"',147 ""',1" 3,06',676 3IS
28,'" 444,'"
',"',136 ""'.11 '.'M"
71 238 "7","
713 700 "
126 ,.. 1.1898<'"
6 '"
<:. msrð xL~:
123
22A
3IS
'00
", 714
'" "'4 Ù
81
",032 ","7
1.MZ
1,578
City of Cupertino D",ft Gon....1 PI"
Conununity FonnIHo",ing ",tion
~
21
Housing Options
.
Buildout is approximately the same as the
Existing General Plan
Option 1: Includes some housing at
VaIleo, none in the Crossroads area
Option 2: Includes no housing at Valko
and no housing in the Crossroads area
Undesignated will need to be adjusted in
Option 1
~
C;tyofCnp<rtlnoD",ftG"",,¡Plan
Conunnnity FonnIHo",;ng ",tion
22
11
H
U
't
Of
1
OUSlll2: nl s: It IOn
Area Units Density Acres
MootaVi,ta 142 Up to 12 11.8
VoU,o P"k s. 125 Up to 25 5 (of20)
H"rtorCity 443 Up to 25 17.7
Ho,",,"od Rd. 493 Up to 35 14.1
CityCenteo 494 Up to 35 14.1
N.DeAnu 215 Up to 25 8.6
VoUooP"kN. 228 Up to 25 8.7
Bobb Rd. 81 Up to 20 4.1
Und"ign.ted 116 Up to 20 6.5
TOTAL 2,337
City orcupomno Dnft Gene...1 PI..
Community Fonn'llo",in. ",tion
23
Housing Units:
Option 2
Area Units Density Acres
MontaVi,ta 142 Up to 12 11.8
v.UooPorl<S. 0 0 0
H"rtorCity 262 Up to 15 17.7
Ho,""...d Rd 316 Up to 22 14.1
CityCenteo 495 Up to 35 8.6
N. De An" 300 Up to 35 8.6
VaU,oParl<N. 0 0 0
Bubb Rd. 81 Up to 20 4.1
Und"ignated 719
TOTAL 2,315 ~ ~
Ci orc rtino D...ft Gen",1 Plan
ty ope
Commonity Fonn'llo",in. ",tion
24
12
Task Force Recommendations
. Street width: Do not reduce street width on
Stevens Creek Blvd. De Anza, Stelling, Prospect
or add more street parking areas to Stevens Creek
Blvd.
. Commercial: Do not reduce the amount of
commercial development potential. Encourage
commercial development. Designate certain areas
of the city expressly for commercial development.
Crossroads area to be all commercial with no
housing.
. Residential: Retain the existing General Plan
residential potential. l!l
C1ty of Cupertino ImftG,""""P1.n ;;.;¡¡¡¡(
Common;ty Fonnlllo...;ng ",úoo
25
Task Force Recol11111endations
. Residential: Do not increase the amount of
housing in the General Plan (just go from
the 20,032 units built in 2000 to 22,369 as
set out in the existing General Plan).
City of Cupertino ImftG""",1 Pion
Comm..,;ty Fonnlllo...;ng secúon
26
13
Task Force Recommendations
. Affordable housing: Maintain requirement
for 15% BMR units for new development.
Encourage developers to build smaller
homes for better affordability. Encourage
mix of housing types and densities to
provide lower cost units.
. Housing densities: Reduce densities in
existing General Plan, in most cases
City ofCu",,- Dmft Goo...¡ Pl,o
Community Fonn/Howiog ""ioo
27
Task Force Recommendations
. Heights Building heights: No 60',45' City
Center, 35' Homestead/Stelling and Valko
Park South; 30' elsewhere in City
. Do not "urbanize" Cupertino; maintain the
suburban character
City ofCupomno Dn<ft Goo...¡ Pl,o
Conunoruty FonnIHowiog ,,"ioo
.~
28
14
Task Force Recommendations
. Jobs/Housing balance: The balance has shifted.
Many are out of work. Many have left the area.
People have moved to the area now from Morgan
Hill and Fremont because prices and rents are
lower than in the past.
. Economic Development: Retain commercial
centers that can generate revenues for the city.
Economic development for fiscal stability should
be a City priority.
City orCupernno Dmft Ge..m¡ PI..
Community Forn>/How;ing ""ion
fft\
~.
29
15
Circulation
l!\
::ill(
Major Issues
. Jobs Housing Balance
. Reduced Street Widtb
. Traffic Level of Service/Pedestrians
. Traffic Calming Measures
City of Cupertino O",ft Gen<ml Plan
C;,çul.tion sectioo
Jobs/Housing Balance
. De-emphasize reference to jobslhousing balance
as being the source of congestion.
- Mention other factors: sprawl, lack of transit
- (Page 4-3)
CltyofCuportinoD"ftGon",¡P¡,u
Ck,uI,non ,eonon
~
3
Reduced Street Width
. Delete reference to considering reducing the
number ofthrough traffic lanes (pages 4-8, 4-14
and 4-16)
City ofCnportino Imft G"",¡ Pl,n
CI"uI,tlon 'nonon
2
Traffic Level of Service/Pedestrians
.
Delete reference to allow a lowered LOS
standard to better accommodate
pedestrians (page 4-16)
CIty ofC""ortino DnoftG""",IPI,n
Cire,I,rion ",rion
Traffic Calming Measures
Specify that traffic calming measures
require 60% approval of people on the
affected street (page 4-19)
CityofC""ortiooO",ftG""",IP,"n
Cire,,"rion ",lion
3
Flood Insurance Maps
Ensure that FEMA flood insurance maps
are developed for the City (page 6-36)
C;ty ofCopomno DnftGcnc",IPlan
Health and Safety "crion
~
;;¡jì I
7
4
Wood Shake Abatement
. Require fire retardant materials for replacement
shakes ifmore than 25% is replaced (page 6-20)
City or Cupertino D"" G'n=1 PIon
H"lth ond sor,ty ""ion
~
5
Volunteers as Disaster Service
Workers
Develop pre-disaster agreements;
Implement the American Red Cross
agreements (page 6-33)
City or Cupertino D"" G,n",,] Pion
H,olth ond sor,ty ""ion
3
Environmental Resources
and Sustainability
Environmental Resources and
Sustainability Goals
. Plan should provide positive motivation and
not be punitive.
. Education is key.
. Use common sense.
. Get started!
Œy ofC....rtioo iliaO G,n...1 PI..
Eovimnm,n..! R""""""S,,,..in,biJity "',rion
~
2
Sustainability and Environmental
Resources Sumn1ary
. Establish a Task Force/Commission to fnrther evaluate
sustainable technologies, cost of ownership,
implementation and annual plan. (p. 5-2)
- Write and keep current the annual Tactical Plan and measurement
for City-wide programs
- Identify and evaluate resources, technologies, products and life-
cycle cost of ownership of sustainable technologies.
- Work with city staff to evaluate the fInancial feasibility of the
recommendations.
CityofCuportinoD",ftO,n",,]PI,n
Enviro"",,otal Ro,o""",slSnstain,bility S"rion
Sustainability and Environmental
Resources Summary
. Educate the public on how's, why's and how to become
more "sustainable". (p. 5-5 to 5-8)
. Develop infonnation regarding sustainable building
practices for homeowners, developers and contractors. (5-
6)
. Post infonnation re: how to get started, government
rebates, and other pertinent infonnation on the City web
site. (p. 5-5)
. Increase awareness of "green" building practices with
regular articles in the Scene and other story placement (5-
8)
~
4
City ofCuportino Dnoft 0""",,1 Plan
Environ...ntal ","o"",,slSnstai..bility "',rion
2
Sustainability and Environmental
Resources Summary
Preserve watersheds and promote water conservation
. Encourage the use of drought tolerant native and non-invasive non-
native plants in public and quasi public landscaping.(p. 5-12 on)
, New developments in sensitive areas must have harmonious
landscaping plans approved prior to development. (5-13)
. Reduce runoff by reducing impervious surfaces. (p.5-20)
. Reduce runoff from pesticides and chemical fertilizers from public
and quasi-public land through companion planting, using other
insecticides oils/soaps, mulching, and other "green" techniques.
(P5-25/26)
c;,y orcuportmo Dnoft 00."" PI,.
E.viroomo.'" R"o""",'¡S""';.,biHty S"no.
~
;;,ji¡¡I
5
Sustainability and Environmental
Resources Summary
1.
Reduce solid waste though
Expanded curbside recycling to include:
Appropriate vegetable and fruit mater in yard waste
recycling. (p. 5-27)
Add curbside battery recycling. (p. 5-27)
Make the e-waste recycling program permanent. (p.5-
27)
Staff and GP Committee recommended shaHs
and musts were changed to shoulds and coulds.
2.
c;ty orc"!',,".o DBft 00."" P".
E.viro."",,'" Ro""""o'¡S",tai.,biHty So'no.
3
Health and Safety
¡,
Major Issues
. Seismic/Geologic review process
. Smoke detectors
. Wood shake abatement
. Volunteers as disaster service workers
. Flood insurance maps
City oCCupertioo Omft Goo",,1 PI,"
H..lth ,"d "'C,ty ",tioo
"
2
Seismic/Geological Review Process
. Encourage developers to exceed Uniform Building
Code levels of safety
. Require developers to provide geotechnical
analyses that conform to CEQA
. Require any residential facility increasing more
than 50% in price or size to conform to the
building code throughout the entire structure
. (page 6-7)
II
3
CIty ofCopomno Dm'G'.'ml PI..
",.lth .od S.f,ty ",erio.
Smoke Detectors
. Require smoke detectors in all new residential
units and at time or sale or rental (page 6-19)
CIty ofCupertloo Dm' G""",' PIon
H"'tb.oo S.f,ty se,tio.
2
Cupertino General Plan Task Force
Participant Survey
Cond""ted 10/1512003
This survey provides a measure of the perceived importance of key elements of the
Cupertino Draft General Plan relative to the future ofthe City over the next 10 years.
The survey also assessed the associated levels of Task Force satisfaction with these
elements in the original draft as prepared by City Staff and the final recommendations
as submitted by the Task Force.
Copcmno GOoenlt Plan Task Foreo
2003
Survey Questions
Satbf.dl" ",,) 1m.....,"
wllol.~ wlTF or
~~~
I. T""",iûonofCily ftom ,ubwban 10 uroao
2. tdontityondo""""t..of'downtown' ,
3. Applioaûon ofßÜxod-"", ,Doing de,ignaûo""
4. &onoßÜo",.hhoftlæCily
5. Dwolling unit oap lovel,
6. Re,idonû.1 do",itie, eo, now devolopmont
7. Affonlablo bo",ing
8. Imp"'tnn ",hoob
9. Building "oigh" f... now d..olopmon"
10. T",ffiooongo,ûonandtovebof,""'"
II. T",ffiosafolyfo'p""'tri."",bioyol""andmolo,vehiol"
12. Environmontalpre""",ûonaods",tainabilily
13. H..lthandsafoly
14. Paro and recreaûon
. 10
'y¡",œly hl_ly
I", H.h
15. Ov""UR"ul"ofGooenlIPlanwkforeo
16. _o"eo,GooenlIPlanwkf"",o
Copcmno G...",I Pion Task Foreo
2003
Satisfaction
Satisfaction
Plot of Hypothetical Survey Results
10
*
*
_____m--_--------_-----_:___~_:m____--------------- m...n
* * I *
I *
*
,10
Importance
cup,rtino G,."", Plan Task Fore,
ZOO,
Desirable Pattern of Results
10
,10
*
Importance
cup'rtino 0,.",,' Pion T"k Fore,
ZOO,
2
I ,
I ,
'* i *
: * i *
--------~----_____m_____---+_---__m___m______--- moon
I * i
I ,
I * i
I ; *
:* !
-------t-------- -->
010
Typical Response Biased High
10
^
Satisfaction
5
A~'ro-","d""d"it,
Importance
Copcmno G""",I Plan T,,' Foree
2003
*
Importance Ranking
ßo!J!¡
I. Prooc"forGe....IPI.nta,kforee
2. Ovenll Resul~ ofGeoml Pion IoS. foree
3. Econo.,,;c bealth of the City
4. Imp,,'on "boob
5. Dwelling unite.p levcb
6. T"fficconges"on.OOlevcbofseMoc
G ~~~:~~::"c~;;:::::"',;:"~.n
[~o ~:::::~~::;~~~':~,~~=d""torvcbiel"
[g ~;;:::':~~=:-:"=:;igna"ons
13. Health.OO"fety
14. Affordablebousing
15. P""'ond"",.tion
16. Environmental pre..",,"on.OO ,ustainobility
Cupertino G""",I PIon T". Force
2003
-
16
15
4
g
5
10
9
I
6
11
2
3
13
7
14
12
3
Surveyed Satisfaction vs. Importance
Initial Draft Proposal trom Staff
9.0
10.0
.
j 7.0
~
:ž
6.0
5.0
4.0
5.0
50
7.0
6.0
9.0
10.0
Imp.ri""
C""eriino 0""",1 Plan Task Foree
2003
Surveyed Satisfaction vs. Importance
Initial Draft Proposal trom Staff
(With Trend);ne)
1,0
~
¡
5.0
4.0
5.0
7.0
6.0
Imp."'n"
C""omno Oe"",1 Plan Task Foree
2003
4
Surveyed Satisfaction vs. Importance
Final GPTF Recommendation
9.0
I
¡¡ 7.0
.
II
4.0
5.0
9.0
Imp.""~
C"",mno G,..,.\ Pion T..k Fom:
2003
Surveyed Satisfaction vs. Importance
Final GPTF Reconunendation
(Willi Trendli..)
I
] 7.0
i
4.0
5.0
'mp."".
c"",rtino Goneæ\ Pion T..k Fo""
2003
5
Surveyed Satisfaction vs. Importance
Final GPTF Recommendation
(With TF App",.al)
9.0
.I
.
. 1.0
.
¡¡
5.0
4.0
5.0
Imp"""~
C"",nino Go"",,1 Plan Ta" Fn=
2003
Economic Health of the City
. Highest rated importance of all iterns in General Plan
, 4th lowest level of satisfaction with initial draft
. Upper mid-range satisfaction in [mal recommendations
. Needs further attention
C"",mno Gee",1 Plan Ta" Fn=
2003
6
Economic Health Issues
. Revenue challenges
°Far lower than municipal average property tax revenue
'State budget and associated subventions at reduced levels (going lower?)
. Risky concentration of local tax revenue in a few enterprises
'Weakened local economy (Structural change?)
'Real estate values highly dependent on school quality
, Potential City behavior could worsen the problem
'Failure to recognize Cupertino in competition with neighboring cities
'Sub-optimizing the use of the few remaining large, non-residential parcels
°Not developing s proactive, long-term revenue plan
'Implementing growth plans that adversely impact local schools
copertino G,nenli Plan T",k Foree
2003
Economic Health Recommendations
. Develop a long-term (10 year) sales/use tax revenue plan
. Tie this plan to revenue projections by major non-residential land parcels
. Make future land use decisions while cónsidering the revenue impact
. Apply mixed-use zoning selectively and cautiously
. Mixed-use 'locks-in' the development configuration for very long time
. Avoid mixed-use in the few, large, high-revenue potential sites remaining
(Specifically Vallco N & S, and Crossroads Center)
, Create a Director of Economic Development position
. Responsible for formulating the sales/use tax revenue plan
. Develops and helps achieve strategy for optimal revenue generation
. Represents the City in 'match-making' landlords and potential desirable tenants
C"",rtino Gen",,1 Ptnn Tuk Fore'
2003
7
QUESTIONS / COMMENTS
Cupertino Ge",...1 PIon T",k Foree
2003
8
Participant Survey Report
2003 Citizens General Plan Task Force
City of Cupertino
2/12/2004
by
Roger Costa
Introduction
During the summer and fall of2003 a citizen task force was created to review a draft
version of the proposed new General Plan for the City of Cupertino. The charge to the
task force was to review the draft proposal and to provide "citizen input" by developing
any appropriate improvement recommendations to the City staff and council.
The task force methodically went about its work and developed a number of such
improvement recommendations. It also participated in a self-survey at the end of the
work effort. This survey provides a measure of the perceived importance of key elements
of the General Plan relative to Cupertino's future over the next 10 years. The survey also
assessed the relative levels of task force satisfaction with these elements in the original
draft as prepared by city staff and in the final recommendations as submitted by the task
force.
This document is the final report on the results of this task force participant survey.
Summary of Results
The Participant Survey of the members of the 2003 Cupertino Citizens General Plan Task
Force measured the perceptions of a representatively-sized sample (27 respondents) of
the overall task force effort. The survey addressed thel4 key topic areas within the
General Plan proposed by staff that consumed the most study time and generated the
most discussion by task force members. These topic areas were surveyed for importance
to the City's future. The top three topics in order of importance were Economic Health
ofthe City, Impact on Schools, and Dwelling Unit Cap Levels. The level of task force
satisfaction with all 14 topics as addressed in the proposed General Plan was measured in
aggregate and individually. It was found that individual topic satisfaction levels when
compared to their corresponding importance levels were out of balance. The majority of
the most important topics enjoyed lower levels of task force satisfaction. The three top-
ranked items in importance were all below the mean aggregate level of satisfaction, as
were six of the top seven topic areas.
The survey also measured the aggregate and individual satisfaction levels with the task
force's fmal recommendations. The aggregate level of satisfaction rose from a mean of
5.4 to 6.0 points. More importantly, the balance between importance and satisfaction
improved markedly with the more important items generally scoring the higher levels of
satisfaction. However, the highest ranked item of importance, Economic Health of the
City, while showing an improvement in satisfaction with regard to the submitted
recommendations, would still seem to need improvement attention.
The task force's overall results and process were also surveyed for importance and
satisfaction. Both topics scored very high in importance reflecting the seriousness with
which task force members viewed their task. The satisfaction with overall results had the
highest rating of all items surveyed reflecting the positive feeling regarding trade-offs
2
made in the recommendations. The satisfaction with process was somewhat lower
reflecting frustrations in dealing with a complex subject under a tight time schedule.
Survev Description
The survey was a single-page questionnaire (see Appendix A) distributed to task force
participants at the last two meetings. There were 14 questions regarding distinct topical
areas covered within the General Plan document. There were also two questions dealing
with the task force process and overall results. Each of the 16 questions asked
respondents to rate the importance of the item on la-point scale with I being extremely
low and I a extremely high. Likewise, the respondents were asked to rate their
satisfaction level with each item twice: Once relative to the initial draft with which the
task force effort began, and again relative to the final recommendations. (Note, that the
overall task force results and process were only rated for satisfaction at the endpoint.)
The specific topical elements were:
1. Transition of City from suburban to urban
2. Identity and character of 'downtown'
3. Application of mixed-use zoning designations
4. Economic health of the City
5. Dwelling unit cap levels
6. Residential densities for new development
7. Affordable housing
8. Impact on schools
9. Building heights for new developments
IO.Traffic congestion and levels of service
II. Traffic safety for pedestrians, bicyclists and motor vehicles
I 2. Environmental preservation and sustainability
13.Health and safety
14.Parks and recreation
IS.Overall Results of General Plan task force
16.Process for General Plan task force
In addition, there was a space provided for unstructured comments.
The format of the survey questionnaire allowed for a quantitative analysis of relative
importance for the above items, such that a ranking or prioritization could be performed.
It also provided for an objective measure of perceived improvement by topical area.
Further and most importantly, it provided a framework from which one could generally
infer if improvement was needed and occurring in the most important areas.
3
The above benefits of the survey are best understood by exploring the presentation format
for the tabulated results. These results are first tabulated into aggregate mean values for
each topic (i.e. the results for all respondents are added and averaged by topic.) These
mean values are then presented using a graphical 'scatter gram' format where the mean
importance and satisfaction value for each topical element is plotted on 2-dimensional
chart as shown below with hypothetical data. The overall aggregate mean values of
Satisfaction and Importance for all topics are also shown as dotted lines.
mean
10
:
:
I
:
:
:
i*
I
I
I
- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - J- - - ---- - - - __on - - - - - - - - - - --
I
:
* ¡
I
I
I
!
! *
¡
¡
:
*
*
*
mean
Satisfaction
*
*
*
1
1
~10
Importance
This format, which looks at the data holistically, facilitates more insightful interpretation
and evaluation of the survey results than by simply viewing each result individually. The
quadrants represented by the dotted lines provide a structure allowing one to begin
making judgments.
The ideal result is to have the data points following a computed trend line that rises from
the lower-left to the upper-right quadrant. This result would indicate that the respondents
are most satisfied with the items that they perceive as being most important. .. A very
desirable outcome. Some deviations about this trend line are to be considered normal.
However significant deviations or a trend line that is oriented in a different direction can
signal areas needing attention.
4
The hypothetical chart shown below illustrates these concepts. The overall data supports
a desirable tend line of survey results. Most of the data points fall within an acceptable
tolerance band around the trend line. However, one data point in the upper-left quadrant
and two in the lower-right quadrant seem to fall outside this band.
The single point in the upper-left quadrant has high satisfaction, but low importance. The
question that comes to mind in this instance is whether this topical area is, on a relative
basis, getting more attention and/or investment than it deserves. Conversely, the two data
points in the lower-right quadrant would seem to indicate insufficient attention and/or
investment for improvement given their relative importance. In fact, one item has the
highest rated importance among all topical areas, thereby signaling the need for more
review.
mean
10
,
: /
, /
:/'
,1
/{'!*
/ ,
/ ,
--------------:;"",<:~---------- : ---------;,7-------------
, "
, *: ,/'
/,//' / i ///
. ¡/
"
// :
/ : *
/' :
// !
/ ,
/ I
, I
,
*
mean
Satisfaction
*
1
1
~10
Importance
A final comment should be made with regard to the scaling of the charts shown above. A
10-point scale was chosen to encourage as much spread in responses as possible. This
helps avoid a clustering of responses around the same values, and improves the ability to
resolve differences. However, respondents will often bias their response toward the high
end of the answer range. For clarity in presentation of actual results when this occurs, the
scales are often truncated with the plotted range running ftom 5 to 10, instead of I to 10.
5
Analvsis of Results
There were approximately 75 members appointed to the task force at its founding. The
typical task force meeting attendance was approximately 45. There were 27 respondents
who completed the survey questionnaire. While a higher percentage of respondents was
desirable, this number still provides a statistically significant and relevant result.
The individually tabulated numerical results of the task force participant survey are
shown in Appendix B. The individual freeform comments are listed in Appendix C.
The relative importance ranking of topics is shown below. Several items were tied in
importance as noted.
Rank
I Process for General Plan task force
2 Overall Results of General Plan task force
3 Economic health of the City
4 Impact on schools
5 Dwelling unit cap levels
6 Traffic congestion and levels of service
6. Building heights for new developments
8 Transition of City from suburban to urban
8 Residential densities for new development
10 Traffic safety for pedestrians, bicyclists and motor vehicles
10 Identity and character of 'downtown'
12 Application of mixed-use zoning designations
13 Health and safety
14 Affordable housing
15 Parks and recreation
16 Environmental preservation and sustainability
Item Number
16
15
4
8
5
10
9
I
6
II
2
3
13
7
14
12
The two items ranked highest in importance were the questions related to the task force
itself - process and results. This indicates the seriousness with which participants took
their efforts and findings. The top three topic items of importance within the General
Plan were:
Economic health of the City
Impact on schools
Dwelling unit cap levels
6
Combining the importance rankings above with the satisfaction rankings for the initial
draft General Plan as provided by City staff yields the following chart.
5.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
c
0
1i
J! 7.0
.!!!
,.
'"
6.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Importance
Note that the trend line is in the opposite direction from what would be considered ideal.
The majority of the most important topics enjoyed lower levels of task force satisfaction.
The logical conclusion from this data would be that the task force would be making
recommendations for substantial change to the initial draft General Plan. Topic numbers
identify individual topic data points. Note that the three top-ranked items in importance
(items 4, 8 and 5) were all below the mean level of satisfaction, as were six of the top
seven topic areas.
Combining the importance rankings with the satisfaction ratings for the task force's [mal
recommendations yields a considerably different picture. One would expect there to be an
improvement, unless process frustrations were to have soured the majority of opinions.
Such frustrations, while present, did not in fact keep the rated satisfaction levels with
final recommendations from improving as shown in the following chart.
Aggregate mean satisfaction levels for all topics improved from 5.4 to 6.0. The
movement in individual topic satisfaction levels varied. Of the 14 topic areas, 11
registered improved levels of satisfaction ranging from +0.1 to + 1.9 points. Three areas
registered declines in satisfaction ranging from -0.4 to -0.7 points. These variations
7
indicated that there was not urriversal agreement of view among all respondents with
regard to the final recommendations. Those that were disappointed in recommended
outcomes tended to significantly reduce their satisfaction ratings, while those that were
indifferent or slightly positive were less likely to significantly increase their ratings. The
individual topic details can be found in Appendix B.
Note that the trend line for the final recommendations has been reversed in direction.
This is a much more desirable orientation whereby the more important topics enjoy
higher levels of satisfaction. However, it is also important to note that the topic viewed
as most important (#4 - Economic Health ofthe City) still falls below the trend line.
More attention to this important area seems to be the message.
This observation is not too dissimilar from the 2002 Godbe Survey of Cupertino
Residents. In that telephone survey, Economic Development Efforts by the city were
viewed as above average in importance, but had the lowest resident satisfaction rating
among all City Services. The General Plan task force had much more insight to the
economic state of the City than the average citizen, so it is not surprising that their
importance ranking was higher than that of Godbe.
9.0
10.0
8.0
c
0
:¡¡
J! 7.0
.iI!
õí
.,
6.0
5.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Importance
Finally, the task force evaluated its own overall results and process with Questions 15
and 16 respectively. The following chart places these responses within the context of all
8
other final recommendation responses. However, the trend line and mean value
quadrants are not included in this chart, since mixing General Plan content topics with
task force self-evaluation topics would result in rather meaningless calculated results.
5.0
10.0
9.0
8.0
c
0
'ii
J! 7.0
.!!!
1i
U)
6.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Importance
As noted previously, these two task force self-evaluation responses scored higher in
importance than all other topics. This may be interpreted as a case of over-rated self-
importance, but it is more realistically viewed as a statement ofthe overall seriousness
and importance to the City with which task force members viewed their efforts. The
satisfaction level with regard to results (#15) is higher than any other individual topic
area, which could Yfell signify satisfaction with the overall set of trade-offs made in
balancing requirements across all topic areas. The satisfaction level with task force
process (#16) is relatively lower. This indicates the frustrations with the task force
process that are also evident in the individual comments in Appendix C.
9
Appendices
A. Survey Questionnaire
B. Tabulated numerical results from survey
C. Listing offreeform comments from survey
10
Appendix A
Survey Questionnaire
Cupertino General Plan Task Force Survey
For each of the following items, please rate your personal view of it's importance to a high quality future for
Cupertino over the next 10 years, and your current level of satisfaction with the associated policies and
strategies outlined in both the pre-task force draft and the subsequent task force recommendations
for the General Plan. There are also two task force evaluation questions.
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
- - - - n -- - -- n- n - - -- - n - - -- - n - - - - - --- - - - - n n - - - - n - - - - - - - -- -- - n - - - n - - - - - - nn
II
II
Note: The importance and satisfaction ratings use a IO-point scale:
I I I I I
1-------~10
Extremely Extremely
Low High
Plme use whole numhers.
Satislaction
wi in~ial
Draft
1. Transition of City from suburban to urban
2. Identity and character of 'downtown'
3. Application of mixed-use zoning designations
4. Economic health of the City
5. Dwelling unit cap levels
6. Residential densities for new developments
7. Affordable housing
8. Impact on schools
9. Building heights for new developments
10. Traffic congestion and levels of service
II. Traffic safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motor vehicles
12. Environmental preservation and sustainability
13. Health and safety
14. Parks and recreation
15. Overall results of General Plan task force
16. Process for General Plan task force
Other Comments:
SatislacUon
w/TF
Result
I I
II
II
II
I I
I I
II
II
I I
I I
II
I I
II
I I
I
I
Importance
01
Item
Name (optional):
11
Appendix B
Tabulated Survey Results
Cupertino General Plan Task Force Survey
For each of the following items, please rate your personal view ofit's importance to a high quality future for
Cupertino over the next 10 years, and your COITent level of satisfaction with the associated policies and
strategies outlined in both the pre-task force draft and the subsequent task force recommendations
for the General Plan. There are also two task force evaluation questions.
Satisfaction Satisfaction Importance
wI initial wlTF of
Draft Result Item
4.61 I 5.51 I 7.5!
5.11 1 5.4! I 7.11
5.21 I 5.6! I 6.91
5.01 I 6.41 1 8.8!
5.11 I 6.81 I 7.81
4.71 I 6.61 I 7.51
5.01 I 4.61 I 6.41
5.31 I 6.91 I 8.1!
4.91 I 6.11 I 7.61
6.21 I 5.81 I 7.61
5.91 I 5.21 I 7.11
5.71 I 5.8! I 6.11
5.81 I 6.11 1 6.6!
6.51 I 6.61 I 6.31
Note: The importance and satisfaction ratings use a 10-point scale:
I I I I I
1-------~10
Extremely Extremely
Low High
Please use whole numbers.
I. Transition of City from suburban to urban
2. Identity and character of 'downtown'
3. Application of mixed-use zoning designations
4. Economic health of the City
5. Dwelling unit cap levels
6. Residential densities for new developments
7. Affordable housing
8. Impact on schools
9. Building heights for new developments
10. Traffic congestion and levels of service
II. Traffic safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motor vehicles
12. Environmental preservation and sustainability
13. Health and safety
14. Parks and recreation
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
IS. Overall results of General Plan task force
16. Process for General Plan task force
Meanw1015&16
12
7.31 I
6.31 I
9.11
9.31
5.4
6.0
7.2
importance
Ranking
6T
8T
10
6T
12
2
4T
4T
8T
14
11
13
Change
in
Satisfaction
0.9
0.4
0.4
1.4
1.8
1.9
-0.4
1.5
1.2
-0.4
-0.7
0.1
0.3
0.1
Appendix C
Listing of Comments by Survey Respondents
I. Speakers were slanted. Many people do not want urban development. I think
from talking to people it is slanted toward growth.
2. This was a very healthy process. I feel that the process and results help us to be
more supportive with rest of citizens. Highly recommend a committee(s) be put
into place to study the plan on a full time basis. One committee member per item.
Care to be taken on how appointments would take place or this committee would
become a Council rubber stamp.
3. I do not believe you will achieve any meaningful data from the above survey.
The general plan is in no better condition than at the time of original draft. The
net result of the 1000+ man hours of time and effort put into this project is a draft
influenced by special interests and poor leadership on the part of the staff.
Tonight's discussion is a perfect example.
4. Bicyclists must be made aware that they must follow the vehicle code! Motor
vehicles go through red lights. More traffic enforcement.
5. Too little time at each meeting to discuss each issue and to vote. Material should
have been distributed to task force several days before each meeting. Voting
could have been done by email. More time should have been given to questions
and answers from the floor.
6. A very ambitious undertaking with short timeline and no professional
facilitation-Too aggressive! Much learning took place. Don't lose it! Pay most
attention to the most important items!
7. More staff direction was needed upfront. Seven copies of new plan for 70 people
was crazy. "Big Idea" book not given out until week 8. Height charts not in color
so couldn't be read. No rationale for significant staff goals until the end of the
process. Too many non-residents on the task force with special development
issues.
8. I liked the process very much. It took awhile for our group to learn to
communicate, but once we did we had very meaningful discussion. . Working in
small groups allowed each of us to express our opinions.
9. I feel that the fiscal issue still needs more emphasis. If the tax base does not
support adequate public services everyone suffers. Safety must also be a
significant guide as this both makes the community more attractive and lowers the
cost of ongoing safety services.
10. I wish the task force had been more structured and that members were more open-
minded; had not come in with personal agendas; and focused more on the issues
at hand rather than attack the speaker. However, I am glad that I had the
opportunity to contribute.
13
~JXH'BIT ccj"v~
REVISED CIRCULATION
POWERPOINT
PRESENTATION
Circulation
.~
~
I
Major Issues
. Jobs / Housing Balance
. Reduced Street Width
. Traffic Level of Service/Pedestrians
. Traffic Calming Measures
. Summary
CÜy ofCuportino Daft Goo,..! Plan
Ci>cu!otion ",tion
.m\
~
2
~
"'J
Jobs/Housing Balance
. De-emphasize reference to jobs/housing balance
as being the source of congestion and traffic
problems
- Not a factor (page 4-3 delete para. 3 and housing
element 2-24)
- Silicon Valley has 197,000 less jobs than the peak in
2000-2001
-Barron's
City ofC,""rti.o Drnft 0,.,..1 PIon
Cit,.I"io. """io.
~
~
3
Reduced Street Width
. Delete reference to considering reducing the
number of through traffic lanes (pages 4-8, 4-14
and 4-16)
. Delete any reference to narrowing of streets for
traffic calming purposes
. Delete any references to the use of the phrase
"Unique gathering place at the Crossroads area"
and "Downtown Village"
. Delete any reference to specifically reducing lanes
or traffic speed in the Stevens Creek corridor
City of Cup,rti.o 0... G,.oml PI..
C¡<oul,tio.",tio.
.~.
~
4
2
Traffic Level of Service/Pedestrians
Delete reference to allow a lowered LOS
standard to better accommodate
pedestrians (page 4-16)
Continue to seek improvement in LOS
with a goal to reach level C on inter-
sections currently at level D or lower
c;,y orC""",ino Onoft G,neml PI.n
Ci"ol.tion ""ion
"~
5
Traffic Calming Measures
Any traffic calming measures should be
considered on a case by case basis only.
Delete strategies #1 & #2 from Policy 4-12.
Specify that traffic calming measures require
60% approval of people on the affected street
(page 4-19)
City orCop,rtino Onoft G,n,nol PI.n
Ci"ol.tion ",tion
~!
!tlr~
~
6
3
Summary
93% oftraffic on Cupertino streets is by car. All
circulation changes and improvements must be
based on this percentage to best serve Cupertino
residents. Improvements to mass transit, bicycle
lanes, and pedestrian walkways must be tempered
with respect to Cupertino's needs and changed
when studies show changes in circulation and
traffic patterns. Walking, use of mass transit, and
bicycling should be encouraged but not enforced
by statute or the General Plan.
.~
4
From: Ken Busch [kbusch@srgnc.com]
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 3:39 PM
To: Steve Piasecki; Peter Gilli
Cc: Mark Kroll
Subject: The Oaks request to reconsider app # Z-2003-03, TM-2003-03, U-2003-05, EXC-2003-04, EA-2003-11
:ltG
3/ / /C'{
Steve Piasecki
Steve I Peter
Upon further consideration we are withdrawing our request for reconsideration of The Oaks mixed use community.
Ken
Ken Busch, PE
Project Manager
Regis Homes of Northern California
kbusch@srqnc.com
www.reqishomes.com
901 Mariners Island Boulevard, Suite 700
San Mateo, CA 94404
Direct - (650) 377-5805
Fax - (650) 570-2233
Mobile- (415) 250-5515
3/1/04
EXHIBIT
or¡,..( ccM'YV\
.3/1 104
CITY OF
CUPEIQ1NO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
March 1,2004
TO:
Honorable Mayor and ~~ uaU. t'..-I-
Ralph A. Qualls, Jr., Director of Public Works r.¡
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Elm Court Storm Drain System
As Council will recall, concerns by Elm Court residents were made during the last flood
season. In response, the Council approved a staff recommendation to install an additional
storm drain inlet system in the Elm Court cul-de-sac to augment the existing system,
which occasionally backed up during a heavy rainstorm. That system was completed in
the fall of 2003 prior to the winter storm season. The Council had asked that the staff
report back following the first major storm event on the operation ofthe new system. This
report responds to that request.
Although there have been brief periods of heavy storm activity, none have contributed to
excess storm water nmoffwhich can cause the surcharging of the system. However the
storms of the week of February 23,2004 did bring very heavy rainfall over relatively
short periods of time. On Wednesday February 25 a storm brought between y." and 1" of
rainfall in a period of less than an hour in the early morning. This heavy downpour
created a surcharge condition in the vicinity of Elm Court and a volume of water in the
east end of the cul-de-sac built up to 8-10 inches of standing water in the midmorning.
However, this volume of water following the accumulation ofthe nmoff disappeared
within 15 minutes of its peak as the new storm drain system did what it was designed to
do and dissipated the nmoff down to a normal curb contained stream until completely
evacuated. In summary, the newly improved inlet system adequately and quickly
dissipated the heavy rainfall nmoff during the peak hours of the most recent and heaviest
storm activity. This report is for the Council's information and no action is required.
Please call me at 777-4453 if you have any questions.
Printed on Recycled Paper
~f¡{Dc¡. OY'afl ~VI'\
EXHIBIT
3-1-0<-1
M( '(0..0
0 r CL l Co \'Y\ '(YÎ
4
'J.
<:.:¡
-+::-~
~['(""\
'--
~~
,<-u
.-l\)
0)
u
~
0
~
~
rJl
C\j
~
~
C\j
~
~
~
C\j
~
0)
~
0)
d
General Plan Task Force
City of Cupertino Draft Ge
General Plan Task Force
2
General Plan Review
-Two year process leading up to Task
Force
-Community meeting
-Planning Commission study sessions
-Community Congress
-Administrative draft: study sessions with City
Council and Planning Commission
Task Force Draft
. Current General Plan adopted in 1993
. Administrative Draft General Plan
circulated in January 2003
. Task Force Draft amends the
Administrative Draft
City of Cupertino Draft General Plan
General Plan Task Force
4
Task Force Process
. Information gathering
. Table Group discussions
. Questions and votes
. Task Force draft
City of Cupertino Draft General Plan
General Plan Task Force
I
5
Purpose of Study Sessions
. To authorize a public hearing General Plan
draft, which could be
- The Task Force draft
- Major issues discussed by the Task Force,
organized as issue alternatives for further
public discussion
. Once authorized, draft will be formatted,
published with EIR and circulated (will take
about two months)
City of Cupertino Draft General Plan
General Plan Task Force
6
Public Hearing Documents
II II Issue
Public Alternatives, IIII EIR
Hearing II II Corrections,
Draft II II Additions
~l
-- CTc HearÐ
City of Cupertino Draft General Plan
General Plan Task Force
/
7
Study Session Schedule
. Today: Task Force Presentations
. Tomorrow:
- City Council, Planning Commission discussion
- Public testimony,
- Council direction (if possible; if not, set another
meeting)
City of Cupertino Draft General Plan
General Plan Task Force
8
Task Force Presentations
. Community Form and Housing: Andrea Harris
. Circulation: Mark Bums
. Environmental Resources: Lisa Giefer
. Health and Safety: Frannie Edwards-Winslow
. Economic Issues and Task Force Survey: Roger
Costa
. Minority Report: Rod Brown
City of Cupertino Draft General Plan
General Plan Task Force
9
Option 1
Option 2
Admin. Draft
Area units dens units dens units dens
Monta Vista 142 12 142 12 142 12
Vallco South 125 25 0 0 700 35
Heart of City 443 25 262 15 619 35
Homestead 493 35 316 22 705 50
City Center 494 35 495 35 300 35
N. De Anza 215 25 300 35 300 35
Vallco North 228 25 0 0 303 35
Bubb Road 81 20 81 20 81 20
U ndesignated 116 20 719 1,270
TOTAL 2,337 2,315 4,615
City of Cupertino Draft General Plan
General Plan Task Force
11
CJ)
,.a...J
.J::
en
.-
Q)
I
..c
CJ)
Q)
1-
L!..
ro
.~
ro
(Q
N
-
..
\.0
CV')
CJ)
co
Q)
L..
«
...
Ln
~
...-
0
(V')
E
:J
E
.-
x
co
::E
.s ~
U) ~
1:«
.Q1o
Q)\D
I
U)
......,
.J::
en
.-
w
I
s:::
OJ
"'C
1-
co
t9 c: ...
c: LO
c: 1--1 LO
0
.:!:
,-
('<)
-
I
.- Q)
uc.:>
HeighHeights in 60+ Areas
Office towers 128' top of parapet
Hotel 91 ' to roof, 108' tower
~ 10 - . II I: I . - I
",
City of Cupertino Draft General Plan
General Plan Task Force
6:1 width to height ratio for second'.
4:7 width to height ratio for entry tow:
:::
~
-
~.
-
'-
-
;:
CJ) ::
OJ ~
';¡
~ ',J
C
:J
t
0
c..
c..
0
C'I
C
CJ) "
:J P
0 !l
:r: 11
"'0
C
ro
E
L..
0
LL
ß
c
:J
E
E
0
u
.~
,
I
~
. . ',d, "'~""""""'" "=" "'",'~""",' -, ,'~, ~, '
t--
.....
;.:
~
p
;..-
/
...)
:;:::
:;:::
,..,
""
:.....
,
¡..J
~
...)
~
-
¡¡¡
¡:¡:;
,'" ',,""'w
ABAG Regional Housing Distribution Model
1999-2006 RHND Allocation Period
Job s 1M <omingol Ra ti 0
Jurisdìction:Ic;U~ERTINO................ ...............::1
19,998
18,155
=
1,843
177,318
1.04%
51,208
45,636
=
5,572
422,754
1.32%
( 1.32% X 0.5 + 1.04% X 0.5) X 230,743 =
2,720
+
0
= 2,720
lncom\' Di~tribution
50<;¡' Towards the Regional Average
Very Low 9.8% 20.5% 15.1% 412
Low 3.6% 10.9% 7.3% 198
Moderate 20.8% 26.4% 23.6% 644
Above -
City of Cupertino D~{\.fMdttèleral Plátii.8% 42.3% 54.0% 1,466
General Plan Task Force
Maximum Building Heights
Rðl<1'rt~/¡"badc
tab,d"."";,,d
JOF""t
Uroon Service Area Boundary
Sp,ereoflnftuence
Boundary AgreernentLine
Unincorporated Areas
City of Cupertino Draft General Plan
General Plan Task Force
19
EXHIBITS
END
HERE