The URL can be used to link to this page

CC 02-02-04DRAF]' RESOLUTION NO. 04-252 A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JANUARY 16, 2004 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative bas certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Director of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 2nd day of February ,2004, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 01/15/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/04 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "01/12/2004" and "01/16/2004" FUND - 110 - GENER3%L FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 605027 V 11/21/03 1699 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC C 4239222 1020 605817 01/16/04 3 A REi~AL CENTER 1108507 1020 605818 01/16/04 9 1020 605618 01/16/04 9 1020 605818 01/16/04 9 1020 605818 01/16/04 9 1020 605818 01/16/04 9 1020 605818 01/16/04 9 1020 605818 01/16/04 9 1020 605818 01/16/04 9 1020 605818 01/16/04 9 1020 605818 01/16/04 9 TOTIU5 CHECK 1020 605B19 1020 605820 1020 605820 TOTAL CHECK 01/16/04 1795 01/16/04 1795 1020 605821 01/16/04 2319 1020 605822 01/16/04 2799 1020 605823 01/16/04 96 1020 605824 01/16/04 M 1020 605825 01/16/04 1807 1020 605826 01/16/04 1475 1020 605827 01/16/04 100 1020 605828 01/16/04 M 1020 605829 01/16/04 130 1020 605829 01/16/04 130 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605830 1020 605831 1020 605831 TOTAL CHECK ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO 1108501 ABAG POWER PUNCI43%SING PO 1108509 /tBAG POWER pUNCNASING PO 1108507 ABAG POWER pT3RC~ING PO 1108508 ABAG POWER PHECHASING PO 5708510 ABAG POWER pURCHASING PO 1108505 ABAO POWER PURCHASING PO 1108504 ABAG POWER PURCHASING PO 5606620 ;%BAG POWER PURCt~ING PO 1108503 ABAG POWER PURCI{ASING PO 1108506 01/16/04 3096 01/16/04 2232 0i/I6/04 2232 AIRGAS NCI~ 1108314 ALL CHEM SUPPLY CO INC 5208003 ALL CHEM SUPPLY CO INC 5208003 ~J~L CITY M~AGEMENT SERV 1108201 APPLE COMPUTER INC 5208003 ARROWTrlEAD MTN SPRING WAT 5606680 1020 605832 01/16/04 146 1020 605832 01/16/04 146 1020 605832 01/16/04 146 CARDIAC SCIENCE INC 1104400 CARIAGA, LOURDES 110 CARIAGA, LOURDES 110 CASH 1106248 C-ASH 5806349 C/~SH 5806449 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX ENGDSGN 10350 TORRE PAGE 1 AMOUNT -1500.00 RENTAL ROTO I~ER 0.00 36.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40.48 164.58 387.75 552.33 CROSS GUM{DS DEC2003 0.00 7383.87 E-WASTE PROGRAM 0.O0 8645.70 BOTTLED WATER 0.00 18.32 Refund: Check - Return 0.00 750.00 TREELIGHTING DECOR. 0.00 162.86 PuMVE TREE TOP A25285 0.00 275.00 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PLTRC 0.00 103.92 Refund: Check - ~278; 0.00 300.09 D.MCCART"HY 4365 DUES 0.00 130.00 E/kRNSHAW 100159 DUES 0.00 130.00 0.00 260.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 5292.66 306.50 103.84 410.34 p.CA~H 12/17-1/12 0.00 111.43 P.CASH 12/17-1/12 0.00 90.19 P.CASH 12/17-1/12 0.00 7.92 RUN DATE 01/15/04 TIME 10:59:56 01/15/04 CI~ OF C~3PERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/04 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUI~D SELECTION CRITERIA: ~ransact.trans_da~e between .01/12/2004" and "01/16/2004" CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 605832 1020 605832 TOTAJ~ CHECK ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FI/ND/DEFT 01/16/04 148 C/~SH 5706450 1020 605833 01/16/04 148 C~H 1108314 1020 605833 01/16/04 148 CASH 1108201 1020 805833 01/16/04 148 C~SH 1108407 1020 605833 01/16/04 148 C~H 1108201 1020 605833 01/16/04 148 C~.~H 1108201 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605834 01/16/04 149 CASH 1101000 1020 605834 01/16/04 149 CASH 1103500 1020 605834 01/16/04 149 C3%SH 1104400 1020 605834 01/16/04 149 CASH 1108001 1020 605834 01/16/04 149 CASH 1108601 1020 605834 01/16/04 149 C~H 2709447 1020 605834 01/16/04 149 ~H 1100000 TOT/~L CHECK 1020 605835 01/16/04 1057 1020 605835 01/16/04 1057 TOTAL CHECK CERIDIkN BENEFITS SERVIC 110 CERIDIA/q BENEFITS SERVIC 110 1020 605836 01/16/04 1820 CERIDIAN BENEFITS SERVIC 1104510 1020 605837 01/16/04 1156 C"~L~ 110 1020 605838 01/16/04 M CHEN, PAT]~ICIA 580 1020 605839 01/16/04 1453 CKRISTOPHERS 1108501 1020 605840 01/16/04 983 CI~K'S FU%RDWOOD FLOORS 5708510 1020 605841 01/16/04 1612 BARRIE D COATE 110 1020 605841 01/16/04 1612 B~IE D COATE 110 1020 605841 01/16/04 1612 B~RIE D COATE 110 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605842 01/16/04 ME2004 1020 605843 01/16/04 178 1020 605844 01/16/04 2857 1020 605845 01/16/04 3032 1020 605846 01/16/04 192 1020 605847 01/16/04 194 COLLOTON, JDDY 5706450 COLONI~tL LIFE & ACCIDENT i10 CONCL~ INC 2159620 CONSTRUCTION TESTING SER 4239222 C-JPERTINO MEDICAL CENTER 5806449 CHPERTINO SUPPLY INC 5606660 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... P.CASR 12/17-1/12 P.CASH 12/17-1/12 P.CASE 1/06-1/13 E.CAS~ 1/06-1/13 P.C~H 1/06-1/13 P.C/~ 1/06-1/13 P.C~H 1/06-1/13 P.CASH 1/07-1/13 P.CASN 1/07-1/13 P.CASN 1/07-1/13 p. CASH 1/07-1/13 P.CASH 1/07-1/13 *FLEX DEP/240125 *FLEX I{LTH/240125 FSA PILD E~DING 12/31 CHA Refund: Check - REFLTArD C~PET REPAIRS TIME/MATERIALS R#23222 CONS~LT~LN~ CONSLrLT/~qT R23942 R#23935 L3~qDSCAPE RVW PAINT/C~ILDWATCH *COLONI~tL/E7013899 SERVICE DEC 9-JAN 8 NOV2003 SERVICES TB/A.LINDLEY SUPPLIES SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 2 AMOUNT 49.96 48.89 308.39 21.04 27.52 4.42 14.80 82.78 71.86 43.82 5.00 21.00 31.23 -0.20 182.71 126.92 643.95 770.87 63.00 140.85 100~00 270.00 3200.00 412.45 302.50 885.00 999.95 136.45 807.29 18465.50 12701.00 15.00 14.52 RUN DATE 01/15/04 TIME 10:59:56 - FIN~CI~ ACCOUNTING 81/15/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOglqTING PERIOD: 7/04 C~ECK REGISTER - DISBDRSEMENT FLTbID SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "01/18/2004" and "01/16/2004" FUbTD - 110 - GENER3%L FSAND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 605848 1020 605849 1020 605850 1020 605851 1020 605852 1020 605853 1020 605854 1020 605855 1020 605856 1020 605857 1020 605858 1020 605858 TOT/~L CHECK 1020 605859 1020 605860 1020 605860 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 605881 1020 605861 1020 605861 1020 605861 1020 605861 1020 605861 TOTAL CHECK 1020 805862 1020 605863 1020 605864 1020 605865 1020 805865 1020 605865 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605866 1020 605866 01/16/04 201 01/16/04 2321 01/16/04 676 01/16/04 996 01/16/04 M 01/16/04 239 01/16/04 2978 01/18/04 242 01/16/04 243 01/16/04 M2004 01/16/04 253 01/16/04 253 01/16/04 2619 01/16/04 2361 01/16/04 2361 01/16/04 2361 01/16/04 2361 01/16/04 2361 01/16/04 2361 01/16/04 2361 01/16/04 2361 01/16/64 M2004 01/16/04 8843 01/16/04 1690 01/16/04 281 01/16/04 281 01/16/04 281 01/16/04 298 01/16/04 298 DAPPER TIRE CO 6308840 DAVCO WATERPROFFING SERV 1108501 DEPARTMEbTf OF JUSTICE 1104510 DU-ALL SAFETY 1108005 Ding, Ignatius Y. 550 ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1108504 ELEMENT K JOURN;tLS 1103500 EMPLOY~NT DEVEL DEPT 110 EMPLOY?4EN~ DEVELOPMEb~T 110 EP&G PROPERTIES 110 EXCNANGE LINEN SERVICE 1106265 EXC~L~NGE LINEN SERVICE 1106500 GENEVIEVE FIRE 2308004 FIRST BANKCARD 1101000 FIRST EANKC/~RD 1104000 FIRST B/~NRCARD 5806349 FIRST B~/qKC~D 5806649 FIRST BANKC~D 1101060 FIRST BANKCA~AD 1106647 FIRST BA~KC~D 1106248 FIRST BA~KCARD 5706450 FIRST RE%~NL~ ~SUP~CE 5606620 FOLGER GP~PHIC INC 1103300 G. NEIL DIRECT MAIL INC 1104510 GARDENI~ 6308840 GARDENLAND 6305540 GA~DENL~ 6308840 GRAINGER INC 2708405 GRAINGER INC 1108314 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... FY 2003-2604 OPEN PNEC TIME/MATERIALS FINGERPRINTING DEC03 PROF SAFETY CONSULT Refund: Check - #272; RPI~qNT LENS A25328 PHOTOSHOP SUBSCRIPT SDI/776-5260-0 REFDUA~JSED NOTICE DP LINEN/SPECIAL EVENT LINENS SERV 10/01-12/31/03 STATEMENT DEC2003 STATNENT DEC2003 STATENENT DEC2003 STATEMENT DEC2003 STATEMENT DEC2003 STATEMENT DEC2003 STATEMENT DEC2003 STATEMENT DEC2003 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC FY 2003-2004 OPEN pLTRC FY 2003-2004 OPEN pURC pARTS/SUPPLIES ~5339 PARTS/SUPPLIES A25341 SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 O,O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 3 AMOUNT 427.62 240.00 448.00 3125.00 300.00 257.73 99.00 17812.12 1184.90 275.90 69.26 84.75 94.01 4963.75 178.06 376.88 554.94 487.30 331.58 308.19 16.60 556.31 2633.82 4333.78 373.95 2537.66 34.23 91.94 193.77 61.06 346.77 204.84 46.65 RLIN DATE 01/15/04 TIME 10:59:57 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 01/15/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/04 CRECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "01/12/2004" and "01/16/2004" 1020 605866 01/16/04 298 GRAINGER INC 5606620 1020 605866 01/16/04 298 GRAINGER INC 1106265 1020 605866 01/16/04 298 GP~AINGER INC 1106265 TOT;~L CHECK 1020 605868 1020 605869 1020 605869 TOTAL CHECK 01/16/04 301 01/16/04 2630 01/16/04 2540 01/16/04 2540 1020 605870 01/16/04 334 1020 605870 01/16/04 334 1020 605870 V 01/16/04 334 1020 605870 01/16/04 334 1020 605870 01/16/04 334 1020 605870 V 01/16/04 334 1020 605870 V 01/16/04 334 1020 605870 V 01/16/04 334 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605871 01/16/04 1898 1020 605872 01/16/04 2027 1020 605873 01/16/04 M 1020 605874 01/i6/04 343 1020 605875 01/16/04 995 1020 605875 01/16/04 995 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605876 01/16/04 353 1020 605877 01/16/04 2285 1020 605878 01/16/04 369 1020 805879 01/16/04 2804 1020 605880 01/16/04 392 1020 605881 01/16/04 396 1020 605882 01/16/04 1396 1020 605883 01/16/04 2514 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 5708510 GREGORY B. BRAGG & ASSOC 6204550 HILTI 2708405 HILTI 2708405 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 1108101 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 1108312 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 1108312 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 1108312 HOM~ DEPOT UREDIT SERVIC 2708404 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 1108101 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 2708404 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 1108312 AUTOMATIC RAIN CO. 1108312 M3%RSHA HOVEy 1104400 Hsieh, Esther 550 IC~ RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 INSERV COMPAA~Y 1108501 INSERV COMP~NY 1108504 IRON MOUNTAIN 1104300 KATt~Y~ KELLY JOESTEN 1106265 KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC 5708510 LAKE TPJ%FFIC SOLUTIONS 1108601 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CIT 1101500 PHILLIP M LENIFL~N 5806449 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1104511 LOS ALTOS G~AGE 5208003 PAGE 4 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT SUPPLIES 0.00 272.80 SUPPLIES 0.00 -481.29 SUPPLIES 0.00 481.29 0.00 524.29 PARTS 15421 0.00 245.53 BILL RVW SERV DEC03 0.00 2073.18 PARTS/SUPPLIES ~5346 0.00 402.72 REF: #10282578 RETURN 0.00 -225.05 0.00 177.67 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 28.04 PARTS/SUPPLIES 25324 6.00 75.23 PARTS/SUPPLIES 25324 0.00 -75.23 P~RTS/SUPPLIES 27299 0.00 13.37 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24572 0.00 31.36 PAMTSySUPPLIES 0.00 -28.04 PAMTS/SUPPLIES 24572 0.00 -31.36 P~RTS/SUPPLIES 27299 0.00 -13.37 0.00 0.00 FY 2003~2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 521.82 CERT/FJ~LEIDOSCOPE 0.00 134.90 Refund: Check - 9274; 0.00 300.00 *ICSt~ 0.00 15524.73 WATER TRTMNT JAR04 0.00 211.63 WATER TRT~ JAN04 0.00 211.63 0.00 423.26 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PUEC 0.00 373.32 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 125.00 PAIb~T SUPPLIES 0.00 19.16 IMPACT RECOVERY SCHOOL O.OO 941.47 CONF 2/26/4 E.M~Y 8.00 340.00 SEHVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 87.50 LEGAL SERVICES 0.00 247.50 TV COLLECT OCT-DEC03 0.00 1110.00 RUN DATE 01/15/04 TIME 10:59:57 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 01/15/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 5 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/04 C~ECK REGISTER - DIEBL~SEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: ~ransact.trans_date between "01/12/2004" and "01/16/2004" 1020 605884 01/16/04 2567 MISDU 110 1020 605885 01/16/04 M MIYAMOTO, ICEIRO 580 1020 605886 01/16/04 1137 EILEEN ~g3RRAY 1101500 1020 605887 01/16/04 302 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPEN 110 1020 605888 01/16/04 M2004 NITE, /~OLD 110 1020 605869 01/16/04 487 NORT~AIRE SUPPLY CO 1108503 1020 605890 01/16/04 M Nakanishi, Bessie 550 1020 605891 01/16/04 M Nejat, Fariba 550 1020 605892 01/16/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 605892 01/16/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 605892 01/18/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 605892 01/16/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 605892 01/16/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 605892 01/16/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 605892 01/16/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 605892 01/16/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 605892 01/16/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT TOTAL CHECK 1103500 1106343 1104300 1101000 1104300 1108201 5806449 1108601 1107405 1020 605893 01/16/04 501 OPERATING ENGINEERS #3 110 1020 605894 01/16/04 981 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108408 1020 605894 01/16/04 981 ORC~ SUPPLY HA-RDWARE 1108407 1020 605894 01/16/04 981 0RCH~ SUPPLY FLARDWARE 2708405 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605895 01/16/04 833 P E R S 110 I020 605895 01/16/04 833 P E R S 110 1020 605895 01/16/04 833 P E R S 110 1020 605895 01/16/04 833 P E R S 110 1020 605895 01/16/04 833 P E R S 110 1020 605895 01/16/04 833 P E R S 110 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605896 01/16/04 833 P E R S 110 1020 605896 01/16/04 633 P E R S 110 1020 605896 01/16/04 833 P E R S 110 1020 605896 01/16/04 833 P E R S ii0 1020 605896 01/16/04 833 P E R S 110 1020 605896 01/16/04 833 P E R S 110 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605897 01/16/04 833 P E R S 110 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX J TRYBUS 385960533 0.00 AMOUNT 223.00 Refund: Check - WINTER 0.00 455.00 MILEAGE APR-DEC03 0.00 124.60 *NAT'L DEF 0.00 17217.67 214.70 TOOLS/SUPPLIES 0.00 39.89 Refund: Check Honore 0.00 Refund: Check - #284; 0.00 300.00 300.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 37.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 38.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 101.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 29.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 50.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 155.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 6.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 230.90 REF: 224981708 001 0.00 -32.46 0.00 617.06 UNION DUES 0.00 715.81 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00 PARTS/SUPPLIES ~5308 PARTS/SUPPLIES 20302 PUTS/SUPPLIES 24571 256.24 41.03 55.88 353.15 PERS 1959 0.00 115.32 PERS EMPLOYEE 0.00 23954.66 PERS BlrfBACK 0.00 462.65 PERS SPEC 0.00 110.33 PERS EMPLOYER 0.00 6514.73 PERS BUYBACK 0.00 123.70 0.00 31281.39 PERS EMPLOYEE 0.00 25823.33 PERS EMPLOYER 0.00 7038.02 PERS BUYBACK 0.00 123.70 PERS 1959 0.00 116.25 PERS BUYBACK 0.00 462.65 PERS SPEC O,OO 174.57 O.O0 33738.52 PERS EMPLOYER 0.00 58.64 RDN DATE 01/15/04 TIME 10:59:57 - FINAMCI~ ACCOUNTING 01/15/04 CITY OF CI/PERTINO PAGE 6 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/04 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "01/12/2004- and "01/16/2004" CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT 1020 605897 01/16/04 833 P E R S TOTAL CHECK 1020 605898 01/16/04 1020 605898 01/16/04 1020 605898 01/16/04 1020 605898 01/16/04 TOTAL CHECK 518 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108506 5606620 5606620 1108506 1020 605899 01/16/04 513 1020 605899 01/16/04 513 1020 605899 01/16/04 513 1020 605899 01/16/04 513 1020 605899 01/16/04 513 1020 605899 01/16/04 513 1020 605899 01/16/04 513 1020 605899 01/16/04 513 1020 605899 01/16/04 513 1020 605899 01/16/04 513 1D20 605899 01/16/04 513 1020 605899 01/16/04 513 1020 605899 01/15/04 513 1020 605899 01/16/04 513 1080 605899 01/16/04 513 1D20 605899 01/16/04 513 1020 605899 01/16/04 513 1020 605899 01/16/04 513 TOTAL CHECK PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELEC~IC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELEC~IC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC G~ & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108312 1108303 1108602 1108830 5606640 1108511 5708510 5606620 5208003 1108506 1108504 1108505 1108503 1108407 1108315 1108314 1108501 1108507 1020 605900 01/16/04 M2004 PACIFIC R3%CING ASSOCIATI 5506549 1020 605901 01/16/04 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108507 1020 605902 01/16/04 533 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROG 110 1020 605903 01/16/04 1929 LEON C. PIROFALO 1107308 1020 505904 01/16/04 1647 POSTM3%STER 1103400 1020 605905 01/16/04 1647 POSTMASTER 1104310 1020 605906 01/16/04 2380 PUEC}IASE POWER 1104310 1020 605907 01/16/04 1693 EEGISTR3~ OF VOTERS 1104330 1020 605908 01/16/04 ME2004 REINALDO DELGADO 1103500 1020 605909 01/16/04 1071 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 1108602 1020 605910 01/16/04 M ROSE, JESSICA 580 ..... DESCRIPTION PERS EMPLOYEE 11/25-12/26 11/25-12/26 11/25-12/26 11/25-12/26 11/25-12/26 11/25-12/26 11/25-12/26 11/25-12/26 11/25-12/26 11/26-12/26 11/25-12/26 11/25412/26 11/25-12/26 11/25-12/26 11/25-12/26 11/25-12/26 11/25-12/26 11/25-12/26 DPST GOLDEN GATE FLDS SERVICE CALL 12/30 PERS LTC/2405 CONSULTING NOV-DEC03 PRMT 00239 MAIL FEE PRMT 00074 P~NWL FEE POSTAGE MTR RESET ELECTION 11/4 FNL CST PAINTERS TAPE SERVICE A~REEMENT FOR Refund: Check - WINTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMOUNT 216.60 275.24 6.04 67.62 104.95 66.48 245.09 100.62 3843.11 2711.27 60.20 172.25 367.04 3626.92 1611.40 7.94 185.11 5015.71 2245,95 1714.43 782.87 236.17 421.89 4796.18 906.51 28805.57 190.00 180.00 209.61 2414.60 150.00 150.00 25215.00 58.13 6744.00 79.00 RUN DATE 01/15/04 TIME 10:59:57 01/15/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 7 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/04 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "01/12/2004- and "01/16/2004" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND 1020 605911 01/16/04 2043 RUDE'S PEST MANAGEMENT 1108506 1020 605911 01/16/04 2043 RUDE'S PEST MANAGEMENT 1108504 1020 605911 01/16/04 2043 RUDE'S PEST ~AGEMENT 1108321 1020 605911 01/16/04 2043 RDDE'S PEST bQ%NAGEMENT 1108505 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605912 01/16/04 M Reddy, Mallik 550 1020 605913 01/16/04 621 THE MERCURY NEWS 1104510 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 SA~ JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 S~N JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 S~N JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108314 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1106407 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 SA~ JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108321 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 SA~ JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108321 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~NY 1108407 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108407 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 S~N JOSE WATER COMP~ 1108314 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 SA~ JOSE WATER COMPAny 1108407 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 SA~ JOSE WATER COMP]~N~f 1108407 1020 605914 01/16/04 625 SA~ JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605915 01/16/04 258 SAN~A CLARA COUNTY 110 1020 605916 01/16/04 M2004 SA~A CL~ COL~f 1101200 1020 605916 01/16/04 M2004 S~NTA CL~CO%~I~f 1101200 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605917 01/16/04 1636 SANTA CLARA CTY SHERIFF 1104510 1020 605918 01/16/04 633 SA~A CI~COL~ SHERI 5806349 1020 605919 01/16/04 2875 SAVIN CREDIT CORP 1104310 1020 605920 01/i6/04 2875 SAVIN CREDIT CORP 1104310 1020 605921 01/16/04 2397 SAVIN CREDIT CORPOP~TION 1104310 1020 605922 01/16/04 2692 SBC 5606640 1020 605922 01/16/04 2692 SBC 5606620 i020 605922 01/16/04 2692 SBC 1108509 1020 608922 01/16/04 2692 SBC 1108508 1020 605922 01/16/04 2692 SBC 1108507 1020 605922 01/16/04 2692 SBC 1108503 1020 605922 01/16/04 2692 SBC 1108501 1020 605922 01/16/04 2692 SBC 1108201 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... RODENT CONTROL RODENT CONTROL RODENT CONTROL RODENT CONTROL Refund: Check - $150 d 0.00 225.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 600.00 CASE MGR RECRUITMENT 0.00 608.28 10/28-1/05 10/29-1/07 10/29-1/06 10/29-1/06 10/29-1/08 10/29-1/08 10/29-1/08 10/29-1/08 10/29-1/07 10/29-1/06 10/29-1/06 10/29-1/06 10/29-1/06 10/29-1/07 10/28-1/05 V ORTEGA 563312780 LUNCH DUES 2004 AS~AL DUES 2004 FINGERPRINTING NOV03 DANCE 12/19 JAN04 H3720300010 FEB04 J0131303354 0.00 228.99 0.00 108.77 0.00 41.30 0.00 70.48 0.00 80.42 0.00 276.43 0.00 394.93 0.00 43.13 0.00 487.92 0.00 19.00 0.00 101.46 0.00 172.51 0~00 238.11 0.00 2543.73 0.00 588.00 0.00 330.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 405.00 0.00 54.00 0.00 344.82 0.00 1057.60 0.00 114.66 H2400800225 FEB2004 0.00 137.83 11/29-12/28 11/29-12/28 11/29-12/28 11/29-12/28 11/29-12/28 11/29-12/28 11/29-12/28 11/29-12/28 0.00 164.98 0.00 163.02 0.00 55.57 0.00 61.43 0.00 55.56 0.00 55,56 0,00 116.46 0.00 254.19 RUN DATE 01/15/04 TIME 10;59:57 - FINANCIAL ACCO~ING 01/15/04 CITY OF C~JPERTINO PAGE 8 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/04 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "01/12/2004" and "01/16/2004" FLTND - 110 - GENER3%L FLIND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT TOTAL CHECK 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 1108504 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 1101500 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 1108501 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 1108504 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 1408505 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 5708510 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 1108503 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 5606620 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 1108501 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 1108507 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 6104800 1020 605923 01/16/04 51i SBC/MCI 1101500 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 1108505 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 5708510 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 1108503 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 1108501 1020 605923 01/16/04 511 SBC/MCI 1108501 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605924 01/16/04 M SHAVER, C~OLE 580 1020 605925 01/16/04 2810 SMART & FINAL 1020 605925 01/16/04 2810 Sg~%RT & FINAL 1020 605925 01/16/04 2810 Sr4~T & FINiaL 1020 605925 01/16/04 2810 SgUkRT & FINAL TOTAL CHECK 5706450 1106343 1106343 5806349 1020 605926 01/16/04 677 STATE STREET B;%NK & TRUS 110 1020 605927 01/16/04 1012 STOREFRONT DOOR SERVICE 1108504 1020 605928 01/16/04 M SUBP~IAM, GO}EATEI 580 1020 605929 01/16/04 951 1020 605929 01/16/04 951 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605930 01/16/04 1406 SUI~ALE CHEVROLET 6308840 1020 605931 01/16/04 2045 SVCN 1104300 1020 605931 01/16/04 2045 SVCN 1104300 1020 605931 01/16/04 2045 SVCN 1104300 1020 605931 01/16/04 2045 SVCN 1104300 1020 605931 01/16/042045 SVCJq 1104300 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605932 01/16/04 3013 SWINERTON BUILDERS 4239222 1020 605933 01/16/64 699 TAP PLASTICS INC 5706450 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 0.00 926.77 #2719421 12/01-1/06 0.00 491.52 #2719770 12/01-1/06 0.00 89.63 #2719770 12/01-1/06 0.00 89.63 #2719770 12/01-1/06 0.00 89.63 #2719770 12/01-1/06 0.00 89.63 #2719770 12/01-1/06 0.00 89.63 ~2719770 12/01~1/06 0.00 89.63 #2719770 12/01-1/06 0.00 89.61 #0213488 12/01~12/31 0.00 590.31 #5170211 11/28-12/27 0.00 15.31 ~0215331 12/01-12/31 0.00 889.31 #2719421 12/01-1/06 0.00 245.78 #2719421 12/01-1/06 0.00 245.78 ~2719421 12/01-1/06 0.00 245.78 #2719421 I2/01-1/06 0.00 245.78 #2719421 12/01-1/06 0.00 245.78 ~2719771 12/01-1/06 0.00 89.63 0.00 3932.37 Refund: Check - WINTER 0.00 108.00 SUPPLIES A26201 0.00 118.97 SUPPLIES ~5737 0.00 320.40 SUPPLIES 22956 0.00 7.57 SUPPLIES A25608 0.00 51.77 0.00 498.71 *PERS DEF 0.00 3962.86 MAIN LOBBY DOOR REPRS 0.00 384.50 Refund: Check - REFUND 0.00 100.00 I~n/kUDSCAPE SPLY A25340 0.00 216.58 LA/~SCAPE SPLY A28343 0.00 542.19 0.00 758.75 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PUEC 0.00 54.41 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PUEC 0.0o 41.25 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC O.00 41.25 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 88.00 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 242.00 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 66.00 0.00 478.50 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 605554.00 CHILD WATCH 1125686 0.00 212.71 RUN DATE 01/15/04 TIME 10:59:57 01/15/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/04 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "01/12/2004" and "01/16/2004" FI31~D - 110 - GE/F~p~ FI31~D ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 9 AMOUNT 1020 605934 01/16/04 701 TARGET STORES 5706450 1020 605934 01/16/04 701 TARGET STORES 5706450 1020 605934 01/16/04 701 TARGET STORES 1106248 1020 605934 01/16/04 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 1020 605934 01/16/04 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605935 01/16/04 ME2004 TIM COLES 5606640 1020 605936 01/16/04 M 1020 605937 01/16/04 1993 1020 605938 01/16/04 1154 TR~, BRENDA 580 TREASURER OF ALAMEDA COU 110 UNITED WAY OF SANTA CLAR 110 1020 605939 01/16/04 M2004 VALERIE T. SMULLEN 5506549 1020 605940 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108501 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZ0N WIRELESS 5606620 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 5806649 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 6104800 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108505 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1101200 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WII~ELESS 1102403 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 %rERIZON WIRELESS 1107501 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1107503 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108005 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108102 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108201 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108501 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108503 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108504 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 5208003 1020 605941 01/16/04 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108602 TOTAL CHECK 01/16/04 2856 WESCO GRAPHICS 5806349 01/16/04 1081 YA~GA~4I'S AK3RSERY 1108408 01/I6/04 1081 Y~4AG~I'S NORSERY 1108303 1020 605942 1020 605943 1020 605943 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605944 01/16/04 ME2004 YI/LIA RL~MALEAN 1104310 1020 605945 01/16/04 1608 ZACK ELECTRONICS INC 4209546 CHILDWATCB A25684 0.00 70.97 RETL~ SAFETY GATE 0.00 -81.16 SUPPLIES 25456 0.00 21.13 SUPPLIES 25456 0.00 4.35 SUPPLIES A25619 0.00 161.84 0.00 177.13 PRINTER SUPPLIES Refund: Check - WINTER 0.00 106.22 0.00 455.00 A LOPEZ JR 566398126 0.00 253.84 UNITED WAY 132.85 DONUTS 'MUSEUM HOP' 0.00 65.00 ~308957246 DEC2003 0.00 36.40 ~408456999 DEC03 ~408456999 DEC03 #408456999 DEC03 #408456999 DEC03 ~408456999 DEC03 #408456999 DEC03 ~408456999 DEC03 #408456999 DEC03 ~408456999 DEC03 #408456999 DEC03 #408456999 DEC03 ~408456999 DEC03 #408456999 DEC03 #408456999 DEC03 #408456999 DEC03 #408456999 DEC03 PRINTING OF SPRING 200 I~SCAPE SPLY ~5349 LJ~SCAPE SPLY A25344 0,00 47.09 0.00 48.40 0.00 51.04 0.00 119.80 0.00 51.04 0.00 77.85 0.00 53.89 0.00 322.95 0.00 97.15 0.00 150.91 0.00 949.53 0.00 594.96 0.00 98.15 0.00 389.13 0,00 47.09 0.00 204.57 0.00 3303.55 O.00 2688.26 0.00 146.08 0.00 341.48 0.00 487.56 POSTAGE/SBIP BOXES 0.00 65.92 C~LES CONNECTORS BEAT 0.00 328.58 0,00 921035.52 0.00 921035.52 RUN DATE 01/15/04 TIME 10:59:57 - FINARCIILL ACCOUNTING 01/15/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/04 CUECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: 5ransact.trans_date between "01/12/2004" and "01/16/2004" FUND - 110 - GENEIL~L FL%MD CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ..... TOTAL REPORT SALES TAX 0.00 PAGE 10 AMOUNT 921035.52 RUN DATE 01/15/04 TIME 10:59:57 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING RESOLUTION NO. 0/4-253 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF TH]~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS I:I:EREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JANUARY 23, 2004 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Director of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 2nd day of February · 2004, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 01/22/04 ACCOLrNTING PERIOD: 7/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO CHECK REGISTER - DISBL~RSEMENT FUl~ SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "01/19/2004,' and "01/23/2004" CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ........... FUND/DEPT 1020 605745 V 01/09/04 M2004 NCBPA 1108201 1020 605745 V 01/09/04 M2004 NCBPA 1108201 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605946 01/23/04 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 605946 01/23/04 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 605946 01/23/04 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 605946 01/23/04 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 605946 01/23/04 4 A T & T 1108501 TOTkL CHECK 1020 605947 01/23/04 1884 1020 605947 01/23/04 1884 1020 605947 01/23/04 1884 1020 605947 01/23/04 1884 1020 605947 01/23/04 1884 TOTAL CHECK ~tLBERTSONS-NORTHEP~ DIVI 1106343 ALBERTSONS-NORTHEEN DIVI 5806349 ALBERTSONS-NORTHEP~N DIVI 5806349 ~J~BERTSONS-NORTHERN DIVI 5806349 ~LLBERTSONS NOR~I4ERN DIVI 1106343 1020 605948 01/23/04 2276 ~J~iA/~R~ 1106265 1020 605949 01/23/04 57 ~K 1104510 1020 605949 01/23/04 57 ~K 1104510 TOT;kL CHECK 1020 605950 01/23/04 3102 BERKELEY BY DAY TOI/RS 5506549 1020 605951 01/23/04 1731 ROGER BERRY 4259314 1020 605952 01/23/04 M2004 BETTER ROA/DS MAGAZINE 1108101 1020 605953 01/23/04 2179 BIGGS C~DOSA ASSOCIATES 2709449 1020 605954 01/23/04 148 CASH 1108201 1020 605954 01/23/04 148 CASH 1108315 1020 605954 01/23/04 148 CASH 1108501 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605955 01/23/04 M2004 CHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIE 5506549 1020 605956 01/23/04 M CHOI, ~SOO 580 1020 605957 01/23/04 1453 CHRISTOPHERS 1108501 1108501 1108501 1020 605958 01/23/04 1363 CLE~tN SOLrRCE 1020 605958 01/23/04 1363 CLEP/q SOLq~CE TOT;kL CHECK 1020 605959 01/23/04 ME2004 CLIFF 1108201 5208003 1020 605960 01/23/04 M2004 COLLINS SCHOOL DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE I AMOUNT RNWL FEE/C.MABLVr~ 0.00 -20.00 RNWL PEE/M.I~/~RIE 0.00 -20.00 0.00 -40.00 J2~N2004 STATE~4i~NT 0.00 22.67 J~N2004 STATEMENT 0.00 ~9.40 J~2~2004 STATEMENT 0.00 22.64 J~/q2004 STATEMENT 0.00 22.67 J~N2004 STATEMENT 0.00 51.12 0.00 158.50 SUPPLIES A25654 0.00 38.39 SUPPLIES ~5616' 0.00 77.39 SUPPLIES 25439 0.00 9.38 SUPPLIES 25443 0.00 58.27 SUPPLIES 25444 0.00 19.95 0.00 203.38 FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC 0.00 COFFEE SUPPLIES 0.00 205.32 COFFEE SUPPLIES 0.00 57.00 0.00 262.32 MYSTERY TRIP 2/11 0.00 900.00 PUBLIC WORKS CONTR3%CT 0.00 BETTER ROADS MAG. 0.00 35974.00 48.00 SERV. 12/01-12/31/03 0.00 65000.00 P.CASH 1/13-1/21 0.00 44.00 P.CASH 1/13-1/21 0.00 7.78 P.CASH 1/13-1/21 0.00 23.60 0.00 75.38 MYSTERY TRIP 2/11 0.00 135.00 Refund: Check - WINTER 0.00 26.50 CARPET REPAIRS 0.00 120.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 392.42 SUPPLIES 0.00 17.32 0.00 409.74 C.M3~UTA~ LICENSE RWL 0.00 60.00 GLOVES/RECYCLING 0.00 37.90 RUN DATE 01/22/04 TIME 10:05:03 - FINANCIkL ACCOLqNTING 01/22/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 2 ACCOLTNTING PERIOD: 7/04 C~ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FLrND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "01/19/2004" and "01/23/2004" 1020 605961 01/23/04 3100 COMCAST 5708510 1020 605962 01/23/04 M2004 CSMFO - CITY OF MONTEREY 1104100 1020 605963 1020 605963 TOTAL CHECK 01/23/04 1579 01/23/04 1579 CUPERTINO LOC-N STOR LLC 1108503 CUPERTINO LOC-N-STOR LLC 1108501 1020 605964 01/23/04 3084 D & D SECURITY RESOURCES 1101065 1020 605965 01/23/04 2966 DE ANZA DINING SERVICES 2204010 1020 605966 01/23/04 209 1020 605966 01/23/04 209 TOTAL CHECK DE ANZA SERVICES INC 5708510 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108303 1020 605967 01/23/04 1838 DELL r~KETING L.P. 6109856 1020 605967 01/23/04 1838 DELL ~GIRKETING L.P. 6104800 1020 605967 01/23/04 1838 DELL ~RKETING L~P. 1107301 1020 605967 01/23/04 1838 DELL MARKETING L.P. 1107405 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605968 01/23/04 2795 DEVCON ASSOCIATES XVI 4239222 1020 605969 01/23/04 1242 1020 605969 01/23/04 1242 1020 605969 01/23/04 1242 1020 605969 01/23/04 1242 TOTAL CHECK DIGITAL PRINT IMPRESSION 1104530 DIGITAL PRINT IMPRESSION 1104100 DIGITAL PRINT IMPRESSION 1108101 DIGITAL PRINT IMPRESSION 1104100 1020 605970 01/23/04 1912 ELESCO:EMERGENCY LIGHTIN 1108504 1020 605971 01/23/04 2762 ELEVATOR SERVICE CO., IN 5606660 1020 605972 01/23/04 3103 EPROMOS 1107405 1020 605973 01/23/04 2558 FEET FIRST ENTERTAINMENT 5806349 1020 605974 01/23/04 2361 FIRST B~%NKC~JlD 6104800 1020 605974 01/23/04 2361 FIRST BANKCkPdD 6109856 1020 605974 01/23/04 2361 FIRST B~KC3IRD 5606640 1020 605974 01/23/04 2361 FIRST BANKCJkRD 1104000 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605975 01/23/04 3042 C~LJ{ FR3%ZIER 5706450 1020 605976 01/23/04 M2004 GALEB PAVING 110 1020 605976 01/23/04 M2004 GALEB PAVING 1100000 1020 605976 01/23/04 M2004 GAJ~EB PAVING 110 TOTkL CHECK ..... DESCRIPTION-- - SALES TAX AMOUNT INTERNET ACCESS J~LN04 O.00 172.74 QTRLY ~fG/LLRWCH 0.00 21.00 G-33 RENT FEB 2004 0.00 217.00 G 34 RENT FEB 2004 0.00 217.00 0.08 434.00 2 TABLES A~FD 5 CPU HOL LEADERSHIP CUPERTINO SE~LL A~L WOOD FLOORS COST OF LIVING INC. 1198.42 0.00 156.00 0.00 1765.00 0.00 386.46 0.00 2151.46 OPTIPLEX GX270T 2.6 GH 0.00 1035.26 KEYBO~u9/DS 15540 0.00 32.53 KEYBO~DS 15540 0.00 97.58 KEYBOARDS 15540 0.80 32.53 0.00 1197.90 TEMP LBRY RENT FEB04 0.00 16180.00 B.CAJlDS/G.KORNAHRENS 0,00 64,04 B.CARDS/B.EBBEN 0.00 53.21 B.CARDS/G.GOEPFERT 0.00 68.04 #9 REIL~RN ENN (SK) 0.00 340.00 O.O0 525.29 SUPPLIES SERVICE CALL 11/24 BMJR PROG KEYRINGS DJ D~,NCE 1/23 STATEMENT DEC2003 STATEMENT DEC2003 STATEMENT DEC2003 STATEMENT DEC2003 0.00 56.87 0.00 422.50 0.00 623.00 0.00 380.00 0.00 381.87 0.00 832,09 0.00 45.95 0.00 63.60 0.00 1323.51 PAINT CHILDWATCH RM 0.00 803.00 REFD APPLICATION FEES REFD APPLICATION FEES REFD APPLICATION FEES O.O0 50,00 0.00 2144.00 0.00 180.97 0,00 2374.97 RUN DATE 01/22/04 TIME 10:05:03 - FINAMCIAL ACCOUNTING ACCOUNTING PERIOD: SELECTION CRITERIA: CITY OF CUPERTINO 7/04 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEY~NT FUND transact.trans_date between "01/19/2004" and "01/23/2004'' CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 605977 1020 605978 1020 605979 1020 605979 1020 605979 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605980 1020 605981 1020 605982 1020 605983 1020 605984 1020 605985 1020 605986 1020 605987 1020 605988 1020 605989 1020 605990 1020 605991 1020 605992 1020 605993 1020 605993 1020 605993 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605994 1020 605995 1020 605996 1020 605996 TOTAL CHECK 1020 605997 1020 605998 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FU~/DEPT 01/23/04 M2004 GAP~NES RESTALrP~ANT 5506549 01/23/04 3101 GLENN GRIGG, P.E. 1108601 01/23/04 1741 GOVCOSINECTION, INC. 6104800 01/23/04 1741 GOVCONNECTION, INC. 6104800 01/23/04 1741 GOVCOS~NECTION, INC. 5806349 01/23/04 2500 TERRY GREENE 4239222 01/23/04 1364 GRIFFIN PAINTING INC 5708510 01/23/04 M2004 NOA~G, PETER I10 01/23/04 334 NOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC 1108101 01/23/04 M2004 IIMC 1104300 01/23/04 2374 JII PROMOTIONS, INC. 1101000 01/23/04 M2004 I~%STELIC, JEANI~IE 5506548 01/23/04 M I~A, S~J~DEEP 580 01/23/04 807 C~ARLES KILIA-N 1101500 01/23/04 2882 ROBERT A. KIM 1103501 01/23/04 3067 KMVT 15 1101031 01/23/04 M2004 KYSC CONSTRUCTION 110 01/23/04 3065 LE~JDER INSTRUMENTS CORP, 1103500 01/23/04 3075 LIFE FITNESS 4269212 01/23/04 3075 LIFE FITNESS 4269212 01/23/04 3075 LIFE FITNESS 4269212 01/23/04 400 LIFETIME TEN/qIS INC 5706450 01/23/04 M LOVE, GREG 580 01/23/04 2356 LYI~ TEC~OLOGIES 6109853 01/23/04 2356 LY%~X TECHI~OLOGIES 6109853 01/23/04 2942 MACKE WATER SYSTEMS, INC 1108501 01/23/04 2588 RIC~RD A. ~43%DDEN 110 PAGE 3 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES T~if AMOI/NT LUNCH 1/22/04 0.00 350.00 WEBSTER TP~INING 0.00 190.00 DISKKEEPER 7.0 WOEKSTA 0.00 7419.46 12 POA SMC HTJB HP PNOT 0.00 61.80 12 POA SMCNLrBNP PHOT 0.00 37.68 O.O0 7518.94 LIINCH MTG 0.00 64.21 PER SCOPE OF WORK TO P 0.00 24652.00 REFD UNUSED MAIL DPST 0.00 177.12 P~JRTS/SUPPLIES LBRY 0.00 28.04 MBRSHP R~L K.SMITH 0.00 185.00 GIFT/M.C~L~G 0.00 576.81 DE ANZA ESL CLASS 0.00 60.00 Refund: Check - RETURN 0.00 100.00 DISABILITY INS[3P3%NCE 0.00 4419~95 CNTRL ~M INSTALLATION 0.00 660.00 PL~LIC ACCESS DEC03 0.00 3264.16 LrNI3SED NOTICE DPST 0.00 324.53 PkRTS/SUPPLIES 16473 0.00 48.05 FITNESS EQUIPMENTS 0.00 4693.00 FITNESS EQUIPMENTS 0.00 59839,20 FITNESS EQUIPMENTS 0.00 150,00 0.00 64682.20 12/08-1/18/04 0.00 86188.74 Refund: Check - WINTER 0.00 180.00 GIE DATA DEVELOPMENT 0.00 1100.00 03/04 GIS DATA ~AINT. 0.00 1375.00 RDN DATE 01/22/04 TIME 10:05:03 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 01/22/04 CITY OF CK3PERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/04 C~ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT F~ND SELECTION CRITERIA: transac~.trans date between "01/19/2004" and "01/23/2004" PL~ - 110 - GENERJkL FUND .... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TkX PAGE 4 AMOUNT 1020 605999 01/23/04 M [4AIELLO, TRO[4AS 580 1020 606000 01/23/04 3011 M3~ING, COLLEEN 5706450 1020 606001 01/23/04 1968 MAZE ~ ASSOCIATES 1104000 1020 606002 01/23/04 M2004 METRO PCS 110 1020 606003 01/23/04 M NAIR, AMITHA 1020 606004 01/23/04 M2004 NEW URBAN NEWS 1020 606005 01/23/04 2639 580 1107200 NOVA F~TNERS INC 4239222 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT I020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1020 606006 01/23/04 493 OFFICE DEPOT TOTAL CHECK 1020 606007 01/23/04 1190 RONAJ~D OLDS 1020 606008 01/23/04 501 1020 606008 01/23/04 501 1020 606008 01/23/04 501 TOTkL CHECK 1107405 1107501 1104510 2204010 1107301 1107501 1107405 1107405 1104510 1104510 1108201 5208003 5806249 1106343 1108201 1104400 1103500 1028 606009 01/23/04 1020 606009 01/23/04 1020 606009 01/23/04 1020 606009 01/23/04 OPERATING ENGINEERS #3 1104510 OPEPJ%TING ENGINEERS #3 110 OPERATING ENGINEERS ~3 1104E10 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY FL%RDWARE 1108501 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDW~%RE 1108830 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY FLARDWARE 5708510 1220 ORC]4~D SUPPLY }L~DWARE 5708510 ORC}L~D SUPPLY H~WAJ{E 1108312 ORCHID SUPPLY HJkPdDWA3(E 2708404 1020 606010 01/23/04 981 1020 606010 01/23/04 981 Refund: Check - RETUR~ 0.00 GR3KND OPENING SUPPLY 0.00 6/30/03 FIN2~NCIAL ~/DT 0.00 REFD Cq~USED MAIL DPST 0.00 Refund; Check - WINTER 0.00 100.00 296.57 652.00 317.29 5.81 NEW URBAN NEWS RNWL 0.80 69.00 SERVICES DEC2003 0.00 60805.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 50.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 16.03 TONER CA~qTRIDGES 0.00 524,96 TONER C~TRIDGES 0.00 314.97 TONER CARTRIDGES 0.00 209.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 12.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 58.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 1.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 35.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 16.45 COFFEE SUPPLIES 0.00 86.73 COFFEE SUPPLIES 0.00 183.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 72.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 81.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8.00 35.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 155.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 216.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 26.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 595.44 0.00 2693.36 CNTRL RM INSTALLATION H & W P.W. RETIRED SP R & W P.W. EMPLOYEES H & W P.W. RETIREES 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1798.88 4575.00 5310.00 1062.00 10947.00 PA~RTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 36.18 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0,00 32.45 P~TS/SUPPLIES 0.00 121.15 ON-TIME DISC 12/26 0.00 -4,89 0.00 184.89 PARTS/SUPPLIES A25324 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24572 0.00 0.00 75.23 31.36 RUN DATE 01/22/04 TIME 10:05:03 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 01/22/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 7/04 C~ECK REGISTER - DISBI/RSEMEIXT FI/ND SELECTION CRITERIA: ~ransac~.trans_date between "01/19/2004" and "01/23/2004" PAGE 5 .... DESCRIPTION- __ SALES TA/( AMOUNT P~d{TS/SUEPLIES 27299 0.00 13.37 0.00 119.96 RICOCHET 11/06-12/19 0.00 156.07 RICOCHET U.TAX 0.09 47.87 11/06-12/19 8.08 21787.74 0.00 21991.68 Refund: Check - WINTER 0.00 100.00 CC&L IMPROVE PLUS 0.00 33.61 CITY CTRPRK IMP PIOkNS 0.00 626.93 0.00 660.54 1/07-1/20/04 0.00 1956.00 FY 2003-2004 OPEN pLrRc 0.00 120.18 EDUCATIONAL REIMBURSE 0.00 291.03 REFD TEMP SIGN DPST O.00 100.00 MBRSHP/DUES 2004 0.08 115.00 DEPOSIT 0.00 650.00 FIRE DEPT FEES 0.00 300.00 0.00 950.00 COFFEE SUPPLIES 0.00 36.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 91.27 O.OO 128.26 2004 DECALS 7256 0.00 814.00 CORDS 25497 0,00 42.20 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 116844.70 C.FLrNDERBLTRK 1/09 0.00 864.00 C.FL~ERBLT~K 12/19 0.00 1440.00 0,00 2304.00 bUJSEL~ HOPPING 1/8 0.08 632.79 CITATIONS NOV20O3 0.00 2370.00 LAW ENFORCE JAN2004 0.00 487139.00 REFILL STAPLES H 0.00 386.83 12/08-1/07 0,00 54.98 RI/N DATE 01/22/04 TIME 10:05:03 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 01/22/04 ACCOI/NTING PERIOD~ SELECTION CRITERIA: CITY OF CUPERTINO 7/04 CHECK REGISTER - DISBLrRSEMENT FUI~D transact.trans_date between "01/19/2004" and "01/23/2004" FUND 110 GENERAL FI/ND 1020 606029 01/23/04 2692 SBC 1108504 1020 606029 01/23/04 2692 SBC 1108501 1020 606029 01/23/04 2692 SBC 1108501 1020 606029 01/23/04 2692 SBC 1108501 TOTAL CNECK 1020 606030 01/23/04 644 SCREEN DESIGNS 5706450 1020 606031 01/23/04 M SELDEN, ROBIN 580 1020 606032 01/23/04 652 SIERRA SPRINGS WATER CO, 1101500 1020 606033 01/23/04 2383 SILICON VD~LLEY A~IMAL CO 1104530 1020 606034 01/23/04 M2004 SIMKARAN, INC. 1100000 1020 606034 01/23/04 M2004 SIMK3~, INC. 110 TOTAL CHECK 1020 606035 01/23/04 2415 1020 606035 01/23/04 2415 1020 606035 01/23/04 2415 1020 606035 01/23/04 2415 1020 606035 01/23/04 2415 1020 606035 01/23/04 2415 1020 606035 01/23/04 2415 1020 606035 01/23/04 2415 TOTAL CHECK SIMON M~TIN-VEGUE WINKE 4239222 SIMON MARTIN-VEGIIE WINKE 4239222 SIMON MARTIN-VEGUE WINKE 4239222 SIMON MARTIN VEGUE WINKE 4239222 SIMON MARTIN VEGUE WINKE 4239222 SIMON M~JRTIN-VEGUE WINKE 4239222 SIMON M~TIN-VEGIJE WINKE 4239222 SIMON MJ%RTIN-VEGUE WINKE 4239222 1020 606036 01/23/04 M2004 SKATES ON THE BAY 5506549 2810 SMJ%RT & FIN;kL 5806349 2810 SM3kRT & FINAL 1106343 1020 606037 01/23/04 1020 606037 01/23/04 TOTAL CHECK · 1020 606038 01/23/04 671 1020 606038 01/23/04 671 TOTAL CHECK STAi~DARD BUSINESS MJ~CIqIN 1104530 STANDARD BUSINESS MACHIN 4239222 1020 606039 01/23/04 1011 1020 606039 01/23/04 1011 1020 606039 01/23/04 1011 1020 606039 01/23/04 1011 1020 606039 01/23/04 101I 1020 606039 01/23/04 I011 1020 606039 01/23/04 1011 1020 606039 01/23/04 1011 TOTAL CHECK STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 630 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 110 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 230 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 270 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 580 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 5700000 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 110 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 560 1020 606040 01/23/04 1020 606040 01/23/04 1020 606040 01/23/04 3045 SUGIMURA & ASSOCIATES 4209225 3045 SUGIMURA & ASSOCIATES 1108501 3045 SUGIMOqlA & ASSOCIATES 1108101 - -DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAR PAGE 6 AMOUNT 11/27-12/24 0.00 77.80 11/29 12/28 0.00 65.18 12/08-1/07 0.00 54.98 0.00 307.92 0.00 O.O0 0.00 SPORTS CTR T-SHIRTS 0.00 357.23 Refund: Check - Return 0.00 750.00 BOTTLED DRINK WATER 0.00 16.37 3RD QTR 03/04 0.00 57678.70 PTL RFD SIGN/NOTICE 0.00 118.80 PTL RFD SIGN/NOTICE 0,00 400.00 0.00 518.80 PLr~LIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 3423.00 PUNLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 6783.00 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 8019.00 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 1584.41 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 9200.15 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT O.00 2790.00 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 44451.60 11/29-12/26/03 0.00 53591.15 0,00 129842.31 MYSTERY TRIP 2/11 0.00 1531.~5 TEEN CTR FOOD A25738 TEEN CTR FOOD A25738 34.71 291.54 326.25 TONER/COPIER 0.00 98.44 1/04-2/03 COPIER R/qTL 0.00 351.81 0.00 450.25 OCT-DEC03 PAYMENT 0.00 3.56 OCT-DEC03 PAYMENT 0.00 1162.46 0CT-DEC03 PAkq4ENT 0.00 20.17 0CT-DEC03 PAI94ENT 0.00 175.17 OCT-DEC03 PA~ENT 0.00 407.36 OCT-DEC03 PAYMENT 0.00 178.58 OCT-DEC03 PAYMENT 0.00 -1417.00 OCT-DEC03 PAYMENT 0.00 1702.70 0.00 2233.00 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT PUNLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 0.00 0.00 737.97 198.80 215.37 RUN DATE 01/22/04 TIME 10:05:03 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 01/22/04 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOIINTING PERIOD: 7/04 CHECK REGISTER - DISBIJRSEMENT FI/ND SELECTION CRITERIA: transac~.trans_date between "01/19/2004" and "01/23/2004" FUND llQ GENEP~L FUI~D CASE ACCT CHECK NO TOTAL CRECK 1020 606041 01/23/04 529 1020 606042 01/23/04 2451 1020 606043 01/23/04 2045 1020 606043 01/23/04 2045 1020 606043 01/23/04 2045 1020 606043 01/23/04 2045 1020 606043 01/23/04 2045 TOTBL CHECK 1020 606044 01/23/04 M2004 1020 606045 01/23/04 701 1020 606046 01/23/04 1013 1020 606047 01/23/04 1013 1020 606048 01/23/04 1013 1020 606049 01/23/04 2396 1020 606049 01/23/04 2396 TOT;kL CHECK 1020 606050 01/23/04 1578 1020 606051 01/23/04 M2004 1020 606051 01/23/04 M2004 TOTAL CRECK 1020 606052 01/23/04 746 1020 606052 01/23/04 746 1020 606052 01/23/04 746 TOTAL CRECK 1020 606053 01/23/04 2904 1020 606054 01/23/04 3014 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT Sb~G~JlD PENT~J~ATION, INC 6104800 SURFCONTROL, INC. 6109856 SVCN 1104300 SVCN 1104300 SVCN 1104300 SVCN 1104300 SVCN 1104300 SWRCB FEES 4239222 TARGET STORES 1106343 T~d~ COLLECTOR 1108001 TAX COLLECTOR 1101200 T~( COLLECTOR 1108001 TRE7%DWELL & ROLLO 4239222 TREAOWELL & ROLLO 4239222 I/NITED RENTALS 6308840 UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON 5606620 UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON 5806649 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 1106508 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 1106500 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 1106500 WEBEX CO59~JNICATIONS INC 6104800 XL CONSTRUCTION CORPORAT 4269212 .... DESCRIPTION DATALINE CHRGS DEC03 WEB COLLECTOR 380 USER FY 2003 2004 OPEN PURC FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC FY 2003-2004 OPEN PURC pEP~IIT 1/1 12/31/04 SUPPLIES 25498 FYMT#2 323-34-006-00 PYMT#2 357-08-037-00 PYMT~2 949-28-326-00 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICE F GEOTECMNICAL SERVICE F ACTUATORS FLEET NOT TO NATURE-MAP BANFIELD NATURE-MAP BANFIELD OFFICE SUPPLIES 7250 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7250 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7250 MONTHLY SUPPORT PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT PAGE 7 SALES TAX AMOUI~T 0.00 1152.14 0.00 71.56 0.00 4296.00 0.00 44.00 0.00 41,25 0.00 44.00 0.00 44.00 0.00 41.25 0.00 214.50 0.00 356.00 0.00 18.19 0.00 176.25 0.00 6356.87 0.00 183.89 0.00 3612.72 O.00 3654,00 0.00 7266.72 0.00 876.83 0.00 SO,O0 0.00 100.00 0,00 150.00 0.00 100.97 0.00 9.18 0.00 88.48 0.00 198.63 0.00 600.00 0.00 126374.40 0.00 1365167.93 0.00 1385167.93 0.00 1365167.93 RUN DATE 01/22/04 TIME 10:05:03 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING RESOLUTION NUMBER 04-254 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCPdBED FOR SALARIES AND WAGES PAID ON January 16, 2004 WHEREAS, the D/rector of Administrativ. e Services, or their designated representative has certified to the accuracy of the following claims and demand~ and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law; NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds set forth: GROSS PAYROLL $ 433,756.37 Less Employee Deductions $(128,265.22) NET PAYROLL $ 305,491.15 Payroll check numbers issued 72450 through 72668 Void check number(s) Director of Admirfistrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this ,2nd day of February ,2004, by the following vote: Vote AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Members of the City Council ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF CUPEI(.TINO CiW Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3220 FAX: (408) 777-3366 DEPPdI. TMENT OF Pd)MINISTRATIVE SERVICES Agenda Item No. c{ SUMMARY Meeting Date: February 2, 2004 SUBJECT Accept the Treasurer's Budget Report for December 2003. BACKGROUND Attached is the Treasurer's and Budget report for the period ended December 31, 2003. The report includes all funds in control of the City. Investments The market value of the City's current portfolio totaled nearly $38 million at December 31, 2003, with a maturity value of $37.9 million. The City intends to hold investments until maturity to redeem full value of the securities plus interest earnings up through the maturity date. Investment earnings rates continued to decline slowly through December, with funds in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) yielding 1.545% compared to last month's 1.572%, and 2.201% a year ago. The City's portfolio as a whole yielded 2.29% in December. Two callable agency instruments in the City's portfolio were called during the month after being held only three months; a continuing decrease in interest rates will result in the early liquidation of several more similar investments in the coming months. In addition, a $2.5 million treasury note matured at the end of the month. After a series of false starts toward higher rates, the bond yields are still looking for some indication of recovery in the short term. The current investment portfolio balance remained fairly level in December, as draws on the 2002 Refinancing proceeds kept pace with capital spending. The investments of the City of Cupertino are in full compliance with our City investment policy and/or State law. Investments are tiered to adequately provide the City with sufficient cash flows to pay its obligations over the next six months, including the projected cash flows required for the library project. Printed on Rocycled Paper Revenue/Expenditure Trends December revenues continued to lag prior year receipts. In addition to the $800,000+ decrease in intergovermnental revenues due to the State's postponement of vehicle license fees payments in the first quarter of 03-04; sales tax receipts have also fallen from prior year levels by about 10% ($440,000). Transient Occupancy Taxes (hotel taxes) are also down over 11% ($82,000). Licenses and permits revenue are off about $180,000 with decreased building permit activity. Departmental spending is generally under budget and below prior year expenditures. Reductions of expenditures for the second half of the fiscal year will be recommended to Council to offset the revenue shortfalls. RECOMMENDATION: Accept the Treasurer's and Budget report for December 2003. Submitted by: Approved for submission: Deputy Treasurer David W. Knapp City Manager City of Cupertino December 2003 ACTIVITY DATE MATURITY DESCRIPTION ADJUSTED MATURITY MARKET YIELD COST VALUE VALUE SECURITIES MATURED/CALLED 09/19/03 09/19/06 FHLB~ 6k 09/29/03 09/29/06 FHLB©,step 6k 07/01/02 12/31/03 Treasury Note 6a f SECURITIES PURCHASED 12/05/03~ · 12/05/07 ~FNMA© 12/15/03 12/15/08 FHLMC©. ste~ 12/22/03 · 06/22/07 FNMA© 12/29/03 03/29/07 FHLMC© 12/30/03 12/30/08 FHLMC©. step 3.20%~ 1,469,053 1,475,000 ~ 1,476,230 i 7_177 300% 1.000.000 1.000.000 1.000.920 ! 3.25% 2.500.000 2.500.000 2.500.000 0 .6k . 2.63% 1,000,000 ~ 1.000,0002 1,000,861 861 6k 3.00% 1,000,000 1,000,000 ~ 1.000.052 52 6k 3.30% 1.000.000 1.000.000 1.002.814 2.814 6k 3.00% 997.035~ 1.000.000~ 998,448 ~ 1.413 6k 2,75% 1.000.000 1.000.000 993.897[ /6.103 ~ CURRENT PORTFOLIO - · CASH ~ ' ~ 12/31/03 }Cupertino National Bank ' 1.947.536 ' 1.947.536 ' 1.947.536 12/31/03 Greater Bay Trust Company ~ ' 0 0 CA [~ 12/31/03 T 1.947.536 1,947,536 1,947.536 CORPORATE BONDS 0 0 0 CORP 0 0 0 LAIF LA 12/31/03 ~LAIF - State Pool 6f 1.55% 12.124.178 12.124.178 12.124.178 MONEY MARKET FUNDS 12/31/03 Cupertino Nat -Sweep account 6J 0.28% 2.298.254 2.298.254 2.298.254 12/31/03 GBTC Money Market 6j 0.51~ 2.970 2.970 2.970 MM 2301.224 2.301.224 2.301.224 MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS 07/09/93 04/1507 iFFHH~.~cCI~), 6k 6.92% 232.804 230.237 06/28/02 02/15/04 6k 2.77% 1.304.045 1.300.000 06/28/02 04/15/04 FHLMCCP'~ 6k 2.83% 1.303.463~ .300.000 06/28/02 05/14/04 FNMA 6k 2.91% 1.312.978 1.300.000 06/28/02 03/15/04 FNMA 6k 2.84% 1.305.095 1.300.000 06/28/02 09/15/04 FNMA 6k 3.12% 1.786.844 1.800.000 236.505 3.701 1.306.349 2.304 1.309.590 6.127 1.321.280 8.301 1.309.473 4.378 1.828.098 41.254 06/28/02 06/15/04 FNMA 6k 2.93%' 1.200.368 1.200.000' 1.209.936 9.568 06/28/02 11/01/04 FNMA 6k 3.34% 666.146 650.000 676.661 10.515 07/21/03 07/21/06FHLB© 6k Z20% 500.000 ~ 500.000 493.688 16.312 08/07/03 08/07/06 'FHLB©.step 6k 2.33% 500.000 500.000 499.474 ~527/ 08/I 1/03 08/11 06 FHLB© 6k 2.50% 2.400.000 2.400.000 2.388.461 ~ 11.539~ 08/25/03' 08/2506 FHLB~ .step 6k 3.06% L000.000 1.000.000 1.001.113 1.113 10/27/03 03/29/07 FHLMC© 6k 3.07% 997.810 1.000.000 998.448 638 11/17/03 11/17 08 FHLB© 6k 425% 997.824 1.000.000 1.007.467 9.643 11/26/03 02/26/08 FHLB© 6k 4.01% 999.052 1.000.000 1.003.597 4.545 12/05/03 12/05/07 ~FNMA© 6k 2.63% .000.000 1.000.000 L000.861 861 12/15/03 12/15/08 FHLMC©. step 6k 3.00% 1.000.000 1.000.000 1.000.052 52 12/22/03 06/22/07 FNMA© 6k 3.30% 1.000.000 ' 1.000.000 1.002.814 2.814 12/29/03 03/29 D7 FHLMC© '6k ' 3.00%- 997.035 ' 1.000.000 998.448 12/30/03 12/30/08 FHLMC©. step 6k 2.75% 1.000.000 1.000.000 993.897 'dO 21.503.464 21.480.237 21.586.211 US GOVERNMENT SECURITIES dS 0 0 Total Managed Porlfolio 37.876,402 37.853.174 37.959.148 82.747 Average Yield - 2.29% IAverage Length to Matur ~y (in yesrs) 1.11 82.747 City of Cupertino December 2003 ACTIVITY DATE I PURCHASE I MATURITY I t [ ADJUSTED t MATURITY DESCRIPTION REF YIELD / COST VALUE MARKET [UNREALIZED VALUE /PROFIT/LOSS TRUST & AGENCY PORTFOLIO CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSYI 07/27/01 _ 12/31/03 ~Cupcrtino Natl(Kester Trust ~ -6b 1.02% 41.445 Total Trust & Agency Portfolio 41.445 41.445 41.445 41.445 0 41.445 BOND RESERVE PORTFOLIO Traffic Impact Franklin Fiduciar5 Trust_ 0.69%' 19. 100 19.100 19,100 I 10/15/02- Lease Payment Fund ' 0.37% 1.156.019 1.156.019 156.O19 0 10/15/02 ' 'LA1F Bond Account ~ L55% 10.271.898 10.271.898 10.271.898 10/15/02 -Wells Fargo Mone) Mkt ' 0.37% 485 485 485 Tolal Bond Reserve Portfolio 11.447.502 11.427.917 11.427.917 Investments by Type] Managed Portfolio ] 0% 0% Mortgage Obligation 57% LAIF 32% Cash 4.00% Rate of Return Comparison 3.00% - 2.50% 2.00% 0.50% 0.00% 11/02 12/02 1/03 2/03 3/03 4/03 5/03 6/03 7/03 8/03 9/03 10/03 11/03 42/03 COMPLIANCE WITH INVESTMENT POLICY City of Cupertino December 31, 2003 Category Standard Comment Yreasury Issues No limit Complies US Agencies (eg FHLMC) No limit Complies Medium Term Corporate Bonds/Notes 30% with A rating Complies LAW ;40 million Complies ~Money Market Funds 20% Complies Maximum Maturities 25% up to 15 years Complies " Remainder up to 5 years Complies Per Issuer Max 10% (except govts) Complies Bankers Acceptances 180 days & 40% Complies Commercial Paper 270 days & 25% Complies Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 30% Complies Repurchase Agreements 365 days Complies Reverse Repurchase agreements Prohibited Complies City of Cupertino General Fund Budget Report 12/31/03 Taxes: Sales Tax 2002/03 Budget~ 2003/04 Budget 10.000.000 10.400.000 Actual -~ Actual 1%ofBudget YTD_ 12-31-03 O_ve_rAJnde_rr · 4,391,145' 3,949,925 -24.04% iAnalysls of Trends Property Tax Transcient Occupancy Utility Tax Franchise Fees Other Taxes Licenses and Permits 1.182.000' 1.630.000¥ Use of Money & Property 1.370.000 1.500.000 Intergovernmental 3.799.905 3.330.000 Charges for Services 381,250 410.000 Fines & Forfeitures 600.~)00 600.000 Other Revenue 16,855,600 40,000 Total Revenue ~ ~ Operating Expenditures: 3.700.000 3.800.000 1,690,336 1,770,1331 -6.84% 1.665.000 1.675.000 704,394 622,646 i -25.65 Yo lJuly - November 2.620.000 2,750,000 . 975,077' 1,040,201 ] -24.35%,u 2,200,000 2,300,000' 439,157' 443,7071 -61.42°/oZ 1.250.000 1,260,000 ~ 564,752' 688,033! 9.21% , ~Property transfer taxes up $88k from last year 876,624~ 693,503i -14.91%~ 750.759 551,870 -26.42% Rents off $150k; investment yields down 29% 1.899.854 1,048,899. -37.00% No Vehicle license fee backfill for first quarter 03-04. 219.955 261,330. 27.48% 199,806~ 214,530. -28.49%' 1,519,168 8,984 -55.08% '02-03 budget includes additional debt proceeds Administrative 1.578.736 1.322.305 588.643, 491,620 -25.64% i Prior year includes $25,500 payment for public access Law Enforcement 6.325.411 6.743.396 3.154.037 3,157,843! -6.34% Communit) Service 765.602 797.888 391.409 300,504~ -24.68% Prior year human service grants= $102k Administrative Service 3.679.871 4.051.782 1.848.215 1,935,971 -4.44% Insurance Premiums ($336k) pd at beginning of fiscal year. Recreation Service 2.254.911 2.230.03 1 1.073.2451 1,004,2051 -9.94% Community Development 3.525.796 2.741.225 1.191.028 967,097 -29.44% BMR payments down $87k, Constr. Plan checks down $55k Public Works 9,159,072 9,139,278 4,233,453. 3,825,101. -16.29% Bldg & Street maintenance down $203k Total Expenditures ~ ~ 12.480.029 ~ -13.55% Operating Transfers In 250.000 1.425.000 862,500~ 712,500' 0.00%~ Operating Transfers Out -25,497,000 -4,955,000 -12,801,000 -2,477,502. 0.00%I .2002-03 Budget included transfers to CIP for New Library Net Income/Loss -6.912.645 -860.905 ~. -2.153.580' $,000,000 Revenue Comparison 4,500,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 3,000,000 - IBYG'D 12/31/02 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 500,000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 -10 11 12 Sales Tax Property Tax TOT Utility Tax Franchise Fees Other Licenses & permits Money & Property intergovernmental 10 Charges for Services t Fines & Forfeitures 12 Other Revenue Expenditure Comparison I 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 Administrative 2 Law Enforcement 3 Community Service 4 Administrative Service 5 Recreation Service 6 Commuoib/Development 7 Pubiic Works City of Cupertino Summ~ of Budget Transfers ' 12/31/03 ' Revenue Expenditure Description ~ [ Acct # ( Ad ustment [ Budget Budget __ ' 44~309 000[ 44,746,826 2002/03 CARRYOVER: EnCumbrances various Departrnent ~arryover~ [ ~v7 ar!ou~55 1 ] 225,760; . 225,760 Project carryovers [ Ivarious 29,237,866__ 1,200,000~ 29,237,866 Carry over law enforcement grants ~ -110-2401-7014 ~ 85,156~ ~ 85,156 Carry over law enforcemen~ grant~ ' 110-2403-9400 ' Carry over law enforcement grants -- ~110-2402-70i4 ' ~;500~ , 7;500 REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS: i I [ ' · EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS: , i ~ ' 03-04 BJA grant ] ! 110-2402-7014 , 7,500. 7,506 03-04 law enforcement block grant , .110-2403 -various 15,409 ~ 15,409 03 -04 COPS grant 110-240 l-various i 00,000 ! 100,000 Increase Sports Center construction ·110-0100-8020 i30,01)0 ~ 130,000 Early operation of Teen Center [1 i 0-6343-70 i 4 ! 40}000 i 40;000 Fund"top four" 0~3 requirem~n~ I [ 10 Var{ous 5501 ~ 2 -( )- ~ o,ooo 20,006 Fund inc. in liability claims, insurance i !110-4540-7014 i 80,001)i ~ 80,00C ~003/04 ADJUSTED BUDGET : 45,50~,000' '/81575,3i5 Capital Projects 12/31/03 I 12/31/~3 Fund Proj# Description C/O eno C/O bud(]et I Adopted chanc!e Total Budqet Encumbrance Expenditure Current Bal. 21C 9612 Minor Storm Drain Improv 9,102.50 25,221.40 105,418 139,741.90 6,920.00 50,667.74 82,154.16 21~ 962(3 Storm Drain Projects 27,073.00 954,764.06 981,837.06 106,525.85 75,547.15 799,764.06 270 9430 StevCanyon Rd wide~ing 118,816.64 5,988.191 124,804.83 105,973.41 13,685.94 5,145.48 270 9432 Hmstd bellevflle T/S modif. 75,000.00! 75,000.00 0.00 75,000.00 0.0(1 270 9435 Nel"ghborhood traf calming 39,031.64 65,433 98,~ 25,000 129,465.62 0.00 38,230.64 91,234.93 270 9436 Stev CrkTrail Bike facilities 30,219.00i 30,219.00 30,219.00 270 9443 Bellinger Rd bike facility improv. 14,959.81 I 189,943.29 204,903.10 46,371.21 2,173.60 156,358.29 270 9447 Mar/Avenue gateway 17,476.07 91,198.891 108,674.96 17,476.07 0.00 91,198.89 270 9449 MaryAvenue Footbridge 25,000.00 998,594.781 800,00¢ 1,823,594.78 1,299,000.00 26,000.00 498,594.78 270 9450 Pavement Management 501,369.15 13455.25'. 750,00C 1,264,824.40 9,644.20 562,541.96 692,638.24 270 953' Ramp metar signal 280/85 312,131,21 70,209.001 382,340.21 312,320.11 1,011.10 69,009.00 270 9532 SR85/Stav Crk T/S modification 49,378.491 49,378.49 49,378.49 270 970' Sidewalk gaps unlmprv areas 75,000.00 75,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 270 9702 Citywide bike parking facililJes 51,789.00 51,789.00 51,789.00 280 9213 McClellan Ranch bldg ~mprov. 211,652.00 211,652.00 211,652.00 420 9113 Stev Crk trail masterplan 6,260.70 6,260.70 6,260.70 420 9115 Skate Park 181,953.40 181,953.40 181,953.40 420 9116 San Thomas trail improvements 43,326,09 53,694.60 97,020.69 0.00 42,609.00 54,411.68 420 9117 StevCrkTrail master plan study 16,036.49 20,732.03 36,768.52 16,036.49 0.00 i 20,732.03 420 9119 Portal~Vilson park improvement 302,828.60 46,139.94 348,968.54 i 40,030.16 293,704.57 15,233.81 420 9121 Memorial park softball field impv, 25,000.00 125,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 420 9216 Sen4ce center expanisen 66,538.00 21,026.55 87,564.55 86,538.00 0.00 21,026.55 420 9223 3ivic center improvements 5,680.00 2,447,882.92 17,000.00 2,470,562.92 3,716.00 2,465,697.00 1,149.92 420 9224 3ivic center pla~a improvements 0.00 937,122.72 937,122.72 0.00 936,122.00 1,000.72 420 922~= 3H apace study 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 43,480.89 6,519.11 : 0.00 420 952~ _~80/Wolfe traffic safety improv. 23,261.69 105,129.83 128,391.52 23,261.69 (295.18) 105,425.01 420 9530 ~hase III Hmstd arterial mgmt 43,540.90 43,540.90 3,604.00 39,936.90 420 9533 Green LED T/S lights 260.26 261,036.00 261,296.26 0.00 45.19 261,251.07 420 9534 Advanced ITS De Anza bird 661,016.83 21,918,59 682,935.42 539,684.01 89,995.05 53,256.36 420 9535 Adaptive traf control system 344,064.77 300,561.00 644,625.77 372,036.76 151,600.43 120,988.58 420 9541 School traffic calming measure 0,00 47,686.55 47,686.55 0.00 0.00 47,686.55 420 9544 Safe routes CHS 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 42~ 9545 T/S upgrades various Iccations 150,000,00 150,000.00 150,000.00 42(3 9546 T raf operation center facilities 24,173.19 129,569.31 153,742.50 23,813.98 38,732.27 91,196.25 42(3 9547 Yellow ped LED T/S up_grades 140,000.00 140,000.00 140,000.00 420 9548 Traf st walkability mods facirity 0.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 420 9549 Safe route Garden Gate school 0.00 0.{30 205,000.00 205,000.00 0.00 205,000.00 420 9550 T/S batter/power backup 0.00 0.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 ' 0.00 i 200,000,00 423 9222 LibraP/construction 738,564.99 17,504,854.19 (17,000.00) 18,226,419.18 i 12,969,659.49 1,259,060.05 ! 3,997,699.64 425 9313 Four Season Corner 15,141.82 926,012.47 941,154.29 536,174.49 402,931.90 2,047.90 425 9314 Four Season Art Sculpture 122,220.00 0.00 122,220.00 50,326.00 71,894.00 0.00 426 9212 Sports Ctr.fltness expansion 72,560.59 1,891,972 72i 130,000.00 2,094,533.31 362,940.89 1,642,163.34 89,429.08 560 9105 Blackberr/Farm 0.00 491,431.621~ 75,000.00 566,431.62 0.00 13,175.00 553,256.62 560 9112 BBF master plan study 10,375.10 71,493.09 81,868.19 5,391.00 26,253.50 50,223.69 Total 3,511,008.44 29,237,866.46 2,410,418.00 130,000.00 35,289,292.90 16,957,320.70 8,288,669.36 10.043.392.84 CUPE INO City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3220 Fax: (408) 777-3366 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUMMARY Agenda Item No. ~' Meeting Date: February 2, 2004 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Adopt a Resolution Accepting the Treasurer/Deputy Treasurer Appointment BACKGROUND Chapter 730 of the statutes of 1976 Section 16429.1 was added to the California Government Code to create a Local Agency Investment Fund in the State Treasury. This Section requires government agencies to appoint a treasurer and deputy treasurer on an annual basis. The attached resolution extends the current appointments of the City's treasurer and deputy treasurer and complies with the state law. This legislation was intended to provide ongoing review of investment issues by the governing body. RECOMMENDATION: Accept the Treasurer/Deputy Treasurer Appointment. Submitted by: Carol A. Atwood Director of Administrative Services Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager Pdnted on Recycled Paper RESOLUTION NO. 04- DRAF]' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 03-031 AND APPOINTING TREASURER AND DEPUTY TREASURER WHEREAS, the City has available funds to invest in accordance with principles of sound treasury management; and WHEREAS, the City annually adopts an investment policy; WHEREAS, the City invests funds in accordance with provisions of California Government Code Section 53600; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby rescinds Resolution No. 03-031 and appoints Carol Atwood City Treasurer and Carol Augustine Deputy Treasurer effective February 2, 2004; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Treasurer is empowered and specifically authorized to invest and reinvest City funds in accordance with California Government Code Section 53600; to buy, sell, trade and deal in authorized securities on margin or otherwise in connection therewith and to pledge any and all securities for future delivery thereof. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 2nd day of February 2004 by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: APPROVED: ATTEST: Mayor, City of Cupertino City Clerk CUPEI(.TINO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX (408) 777-3333 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM Summary AGENDA DATE February 2, 2004 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Approval of Resolution No. 04- 2.~(0 , authorizing staff to apply for Califomia Department of Transportation Safe Routes to School Program, Cycle 5, grant funds for the Garden Gate Elementary School Neighborhood, and approving an additional appropriation of $27,500.00 to provide a total $47,500.00 in local match funds required for the City to receive the grant funds. BACKGROUND Last year the City was successful in obtaining one of two Califomia Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Safe Routes to School (SR2S) grants for which it applied. That grant will provide 90% of the project funding for a $450,000.00 project to provide pedestrian upgrades around local schools Sedgwick Elementary, Hyde Middle, and Cupertino High School. That project is entering the design phase and is expected to go to construction this summer. The SR2S grants are highly competitive, with an estimated 700 applications statewide in the last cycle, 200 of those in the San Francisco Bay Area counties that make up CalO-ans District 4, competing for fewer than 20 grants ultimately approved. The City had also applied last year for SR2S grant funds for a $205,000.00 Garden Gate School Zone Traffic Calming Project, but was not successful in acquiring funds for that project. In anticipation of receiving the SR2S grant for the Garden Gate project, City Council had appropriated a $20,000.00 local match for Traffic Facilities in the 2003-2004 City Capital Improvement Program. Caltrans encouraged staff to resubmit an application for the Garden Gate project in the current SR2S cycle. So this year staff wishes to again submit an application for the Garden Gate School Zone Traffic Calming Project, and feels the City has the opportunity to enlarge the scope of the original project. As such, the current application proposes a project budget of $475,000.00. The project, which will deal with the school routes to Garden Gate Elementary School, will require a greater level of grant funding than requested last year to install missing sidewalks in the recently annexed area of Garden Gate. If achieved, the Safe Routes to School grant for the Garden Gate project will provide 90% of a total $475,000 construction project to repair and upgrade deficiencies and improvements that will provide the students safer routes to the school. The local match from the City will provide $47,500.00, the 10% balance of the funding for the project. In anticipation of receiving the grant, Public Works will make appropriate recommendations during consideration of the FY Printed on Recycled Paper 2004-05 Capital Improvement Program (CD) later this year to add $27,500.00 to the $20,000.00 previously appropriated for a local match for the Garden Gate SR2S project in the FY2003-04 C~P. FISCAL IMPACT Approval of the resolution will authorize an expenditure of $47,500.00 from the City Capital Improvement Program budget to provide a 10% local match for Safe Routes to School Program, Cycle 5, grant for the Garden Gate School Zone Traffic Calming Project. Of this local match amount, $20,000.00 was previously appropriated in the City Capital Improvement Program Traffic Facilities Account No. 420-9544, so approval of the resolution will require that that account be augmented by an additional $27,500.00. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution No. 04- 3.~-~ ., authorizing staff to apply for California Department of Transportation Safe Routes to School Program, Cycle 5, grant funds for the Garden Gate Elementary School Neighborhood, and approving an additional appropriation of $27,500.00 to provide a total $47,500.00 in local match funds required for the City to receive the grant funds. Submitted by: Director of Public Works Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 04-256 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING STAFF TO PROCEED WITH SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM, CYCLE 5, FOR GARDEN GATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NEIGHBORHOOD AND APPROVING A COMMITMENT OF $47,500 FOR LOCAL SHARE OF GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS, The City of Cupertino wishes to submit an application to Caltrans seeking a grant from the Safe Routes to School Program to install traffic calming measures in the vicinity of Garden Gate Elementary School; and WHEREAS, traffic calming measures including traffic signal upgrades, sidewalk installations, access ramps, raised crosswalks, and other pedestrian/bicycle improvements will improve pedestrian and bicycle safety for students on their way to and from school. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby authorizes staffto proceed with Safe Routes to School Program, Cycle 5, for Garden Gate Elementary School, and approves a commitment of $47,500 for the City's local share for grant funds. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 2® day of February, 2004, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 04-257 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING THE FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 9476, LOCATED ON STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD; DEVELOPER, STEVENS CREEK APARTMENTS, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND AUTHORIZING SIGNING OF FINAL MAP WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City Council for approval and for authorization to record the final map of Tract No. 9476, located on Stevens Creek Boulevard, by Stevens Creek Apartments, a California Limited Parmership; and WHEREAS, said map has been approved by the City Attorney; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT a. Said final map of Tract No. 9476 is hereby approved. b. The offer of dedication for roadway and for easements is hereby accepted. c. The City Engineer and the City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign said final map. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 2~d day of February 2004, by the following vote: Vote AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Members of the City Council ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City 9f Cupertino 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 Community Development Department SUMMARY AGENDANO. ~ AGENDA DATE: February_ 2, 2004 SUMMARY: Reorganization proceedings for territory designated as Monta Vista 02-07 consisting of: 1. The annexation to the City of Cupertino of approximately 43.41 acres of developed and undeveloped, unincorporated property generally bounded by Stevens Creek Boulevard, Union Pacific Railroad tracks, McClellan Road and Blackberry Farm, commonly known as Monta Vista. 2. The detachment of the same territory that is within the Santa Clara County Lighting Service Area. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: A. Conduct the public hearing and accept written protests and withdrawal of protests. B. Close the public hearing and ask the City Clerk to determine the value of the submitted written protests. Cl. If the City Clerk cannot immediately determine the value of the protests, continue the item to the meeting of February 17m; or C2. If the protests represent less than 25% of the registered voters who reside in the affected territory or less than 25% of the landowners of the affected territory, 1. Adopt a Negative Declaration for the project, Monta Vista 02-07; 2. Order the change of reorganization per the model resolution; or C3. If the protests represent 50% or more of the registered voters, terminate the reorganization proceedings. PrJntodonRocycledPapor ~--[ Monta Vista 02-07 Page 2 February 2, 2004 BACKGROUND: Annexation strategy_ On February 2, 1998, the City Council adopted an overall annexation strategy for three of the larger unincorporated pockets in Cupertino: Rancho Rinconada, Garden Gate and Monte Vista. That strategy outlined an incremental procedure for annexing Monta Vista because of the overwhelming negative sentiment among unincorporated property owners in 1997. The City was to identify small pockets of property owners that were interested in annexation along with abutting property owners that were indifferent to annexation. The City would then initiate annexation of these small pockets at no cost to residents. By the end of 2002, staff concluded based on its observations of the neighborhood meetings and a postcard survey, that public segtiment had changed dramatically, with more residents in favor or indifferent to annexation than in 1997. Staff believed a comprehensive annexation of the entire unincorporated area of Monta Vista would have a high probability of success. DISCUSSION: Public Outreach Staff did extensive outreach with Monta Vista property owners and residents that included: a. The mailing of the "Monta Vista Annexation News" in early October 2002; b. The mailing of the "Monta Vista Annexation Answer Book" in late October 2002; c. A City/County-sponsored neighborhood meeting at the Quinian Center on November 7, 2002; d. A web page on the City of Cupertino's website that provides information on upcoming meetings and on-line documents; e. Information for a Monta Vista-based, privately-sponsored website; f. Staff attendance at resident-sponsored neighborhood meetings; and g. Timely responses to resident questions via telephone, fax, email and personal contact. Ci~_ Taxes and Fees Upon armexation, unincorporated areas receive city services and are subject to city taxes and fees. The city taxes and fees that would be extended to this area include: The Utility Users' Tax, which is currently 2.4% of the natural gas, electricity and local and long distance telephone charges. Homeowners age 65 or over may apply for utility tax exemption; M0nta Vista 02-07 Page 3 February 2, 2004 The Storm Drainage Service Fee, which is currently $12.00 per single- family or duplex residential parcel per year, $144.00 per acre of apartment, commercial, or industrial land, and $36.00 per acre of vacant land; and 3. The Business License Fee, which is currently $100.00 per year for most home businesses. At the same time, County service fees will be removed. The County lighting service area fee of about $8.00 on Monta Vista property owner tax bills will be removed by the County. Annexation Protests Al1 registered voters and property owners of the affected territory are eligible to protest the reorganization proceedings in accordance with state law. They were informed of their protest rights and procedures in the public hearing notice (Exhibit A-l). Protestors may submit written protests until the closure of the public hearing. They may also withdraw their protests. Protest valuations are based on the current registered voter roll and the year 2003-04 equalized assessment roll of property owners and assessed land valuations. There are 310 registered voters, 274 property owners and a current assessed land valuation of $37,987,763. The following are the alternative City Council actions in accordance with state law: Order the change of reorganization if the protest valuation is less than 25% of the registered voters, and less than 25% of the property owners who own less than 25% of the assessed land valuation. Order the change of reorganization subject to confirmation by the registered voters of the affected territory ff the protest valuation is more than 25%, but less than 50% of the registered voters, or more than 25%, but less than 50% of the property owners who own at least 25% of the assessed land valuation. If the protest valuation is in this range or close to this range, staff requests a continuance of the project to the next meeting, February 17th. Staff will need time to verify protests and determine when an election can be held. 3. Terminate reorganization proceedings if the protest valuation is 50% or more of the affected registered voters. Monta Vista 02-07 Page 4 February2,2004 To reach the protest levels required to have an election (minimum 25 %), protesters must have at least 78 valid protests from affected registered voters, or at least 69 valid protests from property owners who have a combined assessed land valuation of at least $9,496,941. Valid written protests from 27 individuals have been received as of January 28, 2004. These protests represent 22 registered voters (7.1%), 16 property owners (5.8%) and an assessed land valuation of $1,077,949 (2.8%). New property owners not on the current assessment roll must provide satisfactory evidence of property ownership to the City Clerk for their protests to be validated. Staff expects that additional protests will be submitted on February 2nd. Prepared by Colin Jung, Senior Planner Submitted by: Approved by: Steve Piasecki ~_,~c ~ ¢~'/(.z,c,~Davi~d W. Knapp Director of Community Development City Manager Enclosures: City Council Ordering Resolution, Map and Legal Description ERC Recommendation, Initial Study & Negative Declaration Exhibit A-l: Public Hearing Notice and enclosures G: planning/pdreport/cc/montavistal RESOLUTION NO. 04-258 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND ORDERING THE CHANGE OF REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY DESIGNATED "MONTA VISTA 02-07", CONSISTING OF 1) ANNEXATION OF ABOUT 43.41 ACRES OF TERRITORY GENERALLY BOUNDED BY STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD TRACKS, MCCLELLAN ROAD AND BLACKBERRY FARM, AND 2) THE DETACHMENT OF THE SAME TERRITORY WITHIN THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY LIGHTING SERVICE AREA WHEREAS, on January 5, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 04-238, initiating proceedings for annexation of the area designated "Monta Vista 02~07"; and detaching the same territory that is within the Santa Clara County Lighting Service Area. WHEREAS, Section 56757 of the California Government Code states that the Local Agency Formation Commission shall not have any authority to review an annexation to any City in Santa Clara County of unincorporated territory which is within the urban service area of the city of the annexation if initiated by resolution of the legislative body, and therefore the City Council of the City of Cupertino is now the conducting authority for said reorganization; and WHEREAS, said territory is inhabited and all owners of land included in the proposal have not consented to this reorganization; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Sections 57025 and 56157 of the California Government Code, the City of Cupertino has provided mailed notice of the heating on the reorganization to all property owners of record and registered voters within 300 feet of the exterior boundary of the affected territory, affected agencies and other interested parties and notification of their eligibility to protest this City-initiated proceeding with instructions on how to prepare a valid, written protest; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino shall conduct a public hearing on the reorganization in accordance with Section 57050 of the California Government Code, to accept protests, objections or evidence which is made, presented, or filed; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino, at the clo~e of the public hearing, intends to determine the value of the written protests in order to take the appropriate action on the reorganization. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cupertino as follows: Resolution No. 04-258 Page 2 That it is the conducting authority pursuant to Section 56757 of the California Government Code for the reorganization of territory designated "Monta Vista 02- 07", more particularly described in Exhibits "A & B"; That the following findings are made by the City Council of the City of Cupertino: a. That said territory is inhabited and comprises approximately 43.41 acres. That the annexation is consistent with the orderly annexation of territory within the City's urban service area and is consistent with the City policy of annexing when providing City services. The City Council has completed an initial study and has found that the reorganization of said territory has no significant impact on the environment, and approves the granting of a Negative Declaration. The City Council has prezoned the subject territory that constitutes the entirety of the subject reorganization to pre-R1-8, pre-R1-7.5, Pre-P(Res 4.4-12), Pre-P(Res 4.4-7.7) or Pre-P(ML) on June 4, 1984; or prezoned the territory to pre-P(CN, ML, Res 4-12) on September 15, 1980. That the territory is within the city urban service area as adopted by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). That the County Surveyor has determined the boundaries of the proposed reorganization to be definite and certain, and in compliance with the Commission's road annexation policies. The City has reimbursed the County for actual costs incurred by th~ County Surveyor in making this determination. That the proposed annexation does not create islands or areas in which it would be difficult to provide municipal services. That the proposed annexation does not split lines of assessment or ownership as determined by the Santa Clara County Assessor's Office. That the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's General Plan. That the territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing City limits under provisions of the Government Code. That the City has complied with all conditions imposed by the Commission for inclusion of the ten/tory in the City's urban service area. Resolution No. 04-258 Page 3 That __ valid protests to the reorganization proceedings were received by the Clerk of the City of Cupertino, and the value of those protests submitted prior to the close of the public hearing constituted % of the 310 registered voters residing in the affected territory; and % of the 274 property owners who own about % of the $37,987,763 total assessed land valuation and that the last equalized County assessment roll and Registrar of Voters list of registered voters within the unincorporated Monta Vista area were used to make these determinations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: A) City of Cupertino taxes and fees will be extended to this territory, which includes: 1) The Utility Users' Tax of 2.4% of the natural gas, electricity, local and long distance telephone charges; 2) The Storm Drainage Service Fee on an annual basis is $12.00 per single-family or duplex residential parcel; $144.00 per acre of apartment, commercial, or industrial land, and $36.00 per acre of vacant land; 3) The Cupertino Business License Fee applicable to businesses in the City and currently $100.00 per year for most home-based businesses. B) The Santa Clara County Lighting Service Area Assessment of about $8.00 per year shall be removed. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 2~ day of February 2004, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City .Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, C{ty of Cupertino EXHIBIT A ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO MONTA VISTA -02-07 All of that real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, not previously annexed to the City of Cupertino and lying within the area delineated by a boundary that is described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of Parcel A as shown on that certain Record of Survey recorded on July 9, 1964 in Book 182 of Maps at page 5, Santa Clare County records, said point also being on the Southerly boundary of Stevens Creek Boulevard and the Westerly boundary of the annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled 'McClellan No. l- A'; thence leaving the Northerly boundary of said Parcel A and proceeding Northwest along the Westerly boundary of annexation McClellan No. 1-A N20°30'09"W 43.34 feet more or less to the intersection thereof with the center line of Stevens Creek Boulevard, 71.00 feet wide as shQwn on said map; thence leaving the Westerly boundary of said annexation McClellan No. 1-A and continuing along the Southerly boundary of annexation McClellan No. 1-A N90°00'00~W 201.70 feet more or less to a point on the Southeasterly comer of the annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Rifredi 63-9'; thence leaving the Southerly boundary of the aforementioned annexation McClellan No. 1-A and continuing along said Southerly boundary of annexation Rifredi 63-9 N90°00'00'W 125.00 feet more or less to a point on the Southerly boundary of the aforementioned annexation McClellan No. l-A; thence leaving the Southerly boundary of the aforementioned annexation Rifredi 63-9 and continuing' along said Southerly boundary of annexation McClellan No. 1-A N90°00'00"W 93.82 feet to a point on the Westerly boundary of said annexation McClellan No. I~A; thence leaving the Southerly boundary of said annexation McClellan No. 1-A and continuing along the Westerly boundary of annexation McClellan No. 1-A N00o00'00'W 29.93 feet more or less to the Southeasterly comer of the annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "ManrdAdriana 80-32"; thence leaving the Westedy boundary of the aforementioned annexation McClellan No. 1-A and continuing along said boundary of annexation Mann/Adrlana 80-32 Ng0o00'00"W 35.00 feet more or less to a point on the Easterly boundary Of the annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled 'Mann 80-3"; thence leaving the boundary of the aforementioned annexation Mann/Addana 80-32 and continuing along said boundary of annexation Mann 80-3 S00°00'00'W 30.00 feet more or less to a point on the Southerly boundary of said annexation Mann 80-3; thence continuing along said Southerly boundary N90o00'00'W 296.73 feet more or less to a point on the Easterly boundary of said annexation Mann 80-3; thence along said Easterly boundary S00°00'00"W 30.00 feet more or less to a point on the boundary of aforementioned annexation Mann/Adrlana 80-32; thence leaving the Easterly boundary of the aforementioned annexation Mann 80-3 and continuing along said Easterly boundary of said annexation Mann/Adriana 80-32 S00o00'00"W 298.12 feet more or less to a point on the Northerly boundary of Granada Avenue and the Southerly boundary of said annexation Mann/Adriana 80-32; thence leaving the Eastedy boundary of annexation Mann/Adrlana 80-32 and continuing along the Southerly boundary of annexation Mann/Adrlana 80-32 N90°00'00"W 205.30 feet more or less to a point on the Westerly boundary of annexation Mann/Adriana 80-32; thence leaving the Northerly boundary of Granada Avenue and proceeding along said .boundary of annexation Mann/Adrlana 80-32 N00°00'00'W 198.12 feet more or less; ther, Ng0°00'00'W 100.12 feet more less; thence S00°00'00"W 198.12 feet more or less to a point on the Northerly boundary of Granada Avenue; thence continuing along said Northerly boundary N90°00'00~N 300.45 feet more or less; thence le&vinej the Narther{¥ boundary of Gra &da Avenue and roceedir 0 alonej the boundary of annexation "Mann/Adriana 80-32" N00°00'00"W 328.15 feet more or less to a point on the monument line of Old Stevens Creek Blvd. as shown on that certain Parcel Map recorded May 26, 1983 in Book 513 of Maps at page 19, Santa Clara County records; thence continuing along said monument line and said boundary line of annexation Mann/Addana 80-32 N90°00'00"W 220.00 feet more or less to a point on the monument line of Byme Avenue as shown on said Parcel Map and the boundary of the annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Byme 78-2"; thence leaving the boundary of the aforementioned annexation Mann/Adrlana 80-32 and continuing along said boundary of annexation Byme 78-2 N90°00'00"W 20.00 feet more or less to a point on the Westedy boundary of Byme Avenue; thence continuing along said Westerly boundary S00°00'00"W 290.00 feet more or less; thence continuing along the boundary of said annexation Byrne 78-2 N90°00'00"W 305.33 feet more or less to the Northwest comer of Lot no. 31 as shown on that certain map entitled "Tract No. 150, Stevens Creek Subdivision Map No. 2," as recorded in Book 5 of Maps at pages 4 and 5 Santa Clara County records, said point also being on the Easterly boundary of the annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "Blackberry 91-0"; thence leaving the Southerly boundary of the aforementioned annexation Byme 78-2 and continuing along said Westerly boundary of said Tract Map and the Easterly boundary of said annexation Blackberry 91-0 the following courses and distances: S03°03'00"E 101.84 feet, S06°43'30'W 126.05, S15°04'00"E 95.58 feet, S01°41'30"E 92.22 feet, S06°15'00"E 48.91 feet, S28°53'00"E 140.96 feet, S04°26'30"E 139.81, S03°16'30"W 109.72, S08029'30"E 101.39 feet, S46°15'30"E 47.28 and S00°00'00"W 462.56 feet more or less to a point on the Southwest comer of Lot no. 11 as shown on said Tract Map and the Northerly boundary San Femando Avenue; thence continuing along said Northerly boundary and along the Southeasterly boundary of the aforementioned annexation Blackberry 91-0 S57°30'00"W 165.98 feet more or less to the Westedy boundary of San Femando Avenue; thence continuing along the Westerly boundary of San Femando Avenue and the Southeasterly boundary of the aforementioned annexation Blackberry 91-0 S00°00'00"W 30.00 feet more or less to the Northeast corner of Lot 59 as shown on that certain map entitled "Tract No. 211 Stevens Creek Subdivision Map No. 4" as recorded in Book 7 of Maps at page 31 Santa Clara County records; thence leaving the Westedy boundary of San Femando Court and proceeding along the boundary of the aforementioned annexation Blackberry 91-0 and the Northerly boundary of said Lot 59 S69°11'30"W 124.90 feet more or less to an angle point on the Northerly boundary of said Lot 59; thence continuing along the boundary of said subdivision as shown on the aforementioned Map for Tract No. 211 and the boundary of the aforementioned annexation Blackberry 91-0 the following courses and distances: S83°09'00"W 239.08 feet, S42°55'00"W 138.86 feet, S36°42'00"E 47.56 feet, S33°31'00"E 93.06 feet, S30°31'00"E 79.45 feet and S45°33'00"E 189.70 feet more or less to the Southwest comer of Lot 43 as shown on aforementioned Map for Tract No. 211; thence along the Eastedy boundary of. the aforementioned annexation "Blackberry 91-0" the following courses and distances: S12o00'00"E 61.34 feet, S24°04'30"E 92.58 feet and S12°51'30"W 172.35 feet more or less to the Southwest corner of Lot 4 as shown on that certain map recorded in Book 649 of Maps at pages 41 and 42, Santa Clara County Records, said point also being on the Northern boundary of the annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "D'Amico 72-~A'; thence leaving the boundary of aforementioned annexation "Blackberry 91-0' and continuing along said boundary of annexation 'D'Amico 72-6A" and the Northerly boundary of McClellan Road N90°00'00"E 351.37 feet more or less to a point on the Eestedy boundary of aforementioned annexation "D'Amico 72-6A"; thence leaving the Northerly boundary of McClellan Road and continuing along the Eastedy boundary of aforementioned annexation 'D'Amico 72-6A" S00°00'00"E 40.00 feet more or Jess to a point on the Southerly boundary of McClellan Road; thence continuing along said boundary of McClellan Road and said boundary of aforementioned annexation "D'Amico 72-6A' along a non-tangent curve to the left with a radial beadng of N00°00'00"E, a radius of 15.00 feet an internal angle of 90° and an arc length of 23.56 feet to a point of tangency on the Easterly boundary of said McClellan Road; thence continuing along said boundary of McClellan Road and the Eastedy boundary of aforementioned annexation "D'Amico 72-6A" S00°00'O0~E 205.24 feet more or less to a point on the Northerly boundary of the annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "McClellan 70-6"; thence leaving the Easterly boundary of the aforementioned annexation "D'Amico 72-6A" and the Easterly boundary of the aforementioned McClellan Road and proceeding along said Northerly boundary of said annexation "McClellan 70-6" N90°00'00"E 164.00 feet more or less to a point on the Eastedy boundary of aforementioned annexation "McClellan No. 1-A'; thence leaving the Northerly boundary of aforementioned annexation "McClellan 70-6" and proceeding along said boundary of aforementioned annexation "McClellan No. l-A" N00°00'00"E 240.24 feet more or less to a point on the center line of aforementioned McClellan Road; thence continuing along said center line of McClellan Road and said boundary of aforementioned annexation "McClellan No. l-A" N90000'00"E 861.62 feet; thence leaving said center line and proceeding N00°00'00"E 30.00 feet more or less to a point on the Northedy boundary of Mcclellan Road and the Easterly boundary of Orange Avenue; thence leaving the Northerly boundary of McClellan Road and continuing along said Easterly boundary of Orange Avenue and the boundary of aforementioned annexation "McClellan No. l-A" N00°00'00'E 339.90 feet more or less; thence leaving the Eastedy boundary of Orange Avenue and continuing along the boundary of aforementioned annexation "McClellan No. l-A" Ng0000'00"E 130.00 feet more or less; thence N00°00'00"E 50.00 feet more or less; thence N90°00'00"E 168.25 feet mora or less; thence N00°00'00"E 100,00 feet more or less; thence N90°00'00"E 161.87 feet more or less; thence N00°00'00'E 170.50 feat more or less; thence N90°00'00"E 330.00 feet more or less; thence N00°00'00"E 1,782.75 feet more or less; thence continuing along the boundary of aforementioned annexation "McClellan No. l-A" N20°30'09"W 159.13 feet more or less to the point of BEGINNING of this description. The parcels to be annexed within the above described boundary have a total area of 43.41 acres more or less and lie entirely within the County of Santa Clara, State of Califomia. Revised 9-18-03 J:LlOBStCup-Monta Vista annexationtLegalstOveralI-Revg- l & doc CUPEP INO E×mlgIT: A-1 City Hall 10300 T0rre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3223 FAX: (408) 777-3366 vrrc~.cupertino.org OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING OF THE REORGANIZATION (ANNEXATION) OF THE MONTA VISTA AREA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at their regular meeting of Monday, February 2, 2004, the Cupertino City Council will conduct a public hearing to consider a reorganization often/tory designated as Monta Vista 02-07 consisting of: The annexation to the City of Cupertino of approximately 43.41 acres of unincorporated, residential, commercial and industrial developed property generally bounded by Stevens Creek Boulevard, the Union Pacific Railroad tracks, Blackberry Farm Park and McClellan Road (See enclosed map). The detachment of the same territory that is within the Santa Clara County Lighting Service District. The County Lighting Service Assessment levied on Monta Vista property tax bills will be removed if the territory is annexed to the City of Cupertino. In connection with this reorganization of territory, there will be a concurrent extension of City of Cupertino taxes and fees to this territory. The taxes and fees include: The Utility Users' Tax, which is currently 2.4% of the natural gas, electricity, local and long distance telephone charges. Homeowners age 65 or over may apply for a utility users' tax exemption at City Hall. The Storm Drainage Service Fee, which is currently $12.00 per single-family or duplex residential parcel, $144.00 per acre of apartment, commercial or industrial land, and $36.00 per acre of vacant land, on an annual basis. The Business License Fee applies if you have a home business in Cupertino. The annual fee is currently $100.00 for most home businesses. Only written legal protests from registered voters or property owners of the affected Monta Vista parcels will be counted toward the reorganization proceeding in accordance with State law. Instructions for preparing a valid, legal protest are enclosed for registered voters and property owners of the affected territory (See map). The City Council meets at 6:45 p.m., City Hall Council Chamber, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California. Interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. If you wish to challenge the City Council's action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Cupertino City Hall at, or prior to, the public hearing. For new Monta Vista residents and property owners, the City has a limited supply of the "Monta Vista Annexation Answer Book." To obtain a copy or if you have questions, please contact the Community Development Department at (408) 777-3308, write to them at 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA, 95014, or send e-mail to Planning~Cupertino.org. The Answer Book can also be downloaded from the City of Cupertino intemet website at www.cupertino.org Kimberly Smith, City Clerk, City of Cupertino CUPE INO Instructions for Protesting the Monta Vista Reorganization (Annexation) In order to protest the annexation of the unincorporated portion of Monta Vista to the City of Cupertino, there are certain requirements to make a valid protest. The protest must be submitted in the following manner to the Cupertino City Clerk by the close of the public hearing on this item, February 2, 2004. All of the information listed below must be included. IF YOU ARE A MONTA VISTA RESIDENT, BUT NOT A MONTA VISTA PROPERTY OWNER: [21 YOU must be a resident of the Monta Vista area proposed for annexation (See map). [] The protest must be in writing, dated and signed. Print your name as well. [] The protest must oppose the annexation by name, which is "Monta Vista 02-07". [] You must provide your street address. [] You must be a registered voter at your current address for your protest to count. IF YOU ARE A MONTA VISTA PROPERTY OWNER: [] You must be a property owner of the Monta Vista area proposed for annexation (See map). [] The protest must be in writing, dated and signed. Print your name as well. [] The protest must oppose the annexation by name, which is "Monta Vista 02-07". Fl You must indicate whether you are currently residing in Monta Vista or not. You must provide your residence address and the street address of the property in Monta Vista, if different. PROTESTS MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING BY FEBRUARY 2, 2004 TO: CUPERTINO CITY CLERK 10300 TORRE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 If you have questions, please contact the Community Development Depa2ment at (408) 777-3308, write to them at 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA, 95014, or send e-mail to planning~cupertino.org Stevens Creek Blvd Granada Av McClellan Rd Noonan Ct City of Cupertino MONTA VISTA ANNEXATION MAP ~ Unincorporated Parcels Incorporated (City) Parcels 100 0 100 200 300 400 Prepared by the Community Development Department Last Updated: November 5, 2003 CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE December 10, 2003 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on December 10, 2003. PROIECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application No.: Applicant: Location: SP-2001-05 (EA-2003-17) City of Cupertino Monta Vista DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST The annexation to the City of Cupertino of 43.41 acres of unincorporated residential, commercial and industrial developed property generally bounded by Stevens Creek Boulevard, the Union Pacific Railroad tracks, Blackberry Farm and McClellan Road, commonly know as Monta Vista. Detachment of same territory within the Santa Clara County Lighting Service District. FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and has no signif~ant environmental impacts. Director of Community Development g/erc/REC EA-2003-17 CUPEP TINO City of CupertJn0 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3251 FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Title: Monta Vista 02-07 ReorRanization lstaff Use Only A File No. EA-2003-17 ase File N~-05 ttachments ~ timates Project Location: Area bounded by Stevens Creek Blvd., Union Pacific Railroad tracks, Blackberry Farm, McClellan Road Project Description: Annexation to the City of 43.41 acres of unincorporated developed and undeveloped property and the detachment of the same territory that is within the Santa Clara County LiRhtin.q Service District. Environmental Setting: Urban settinq with single and multi-family residential uses, commercial and light industrial uses PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Area (ac.) - 43.41 Building Coverage - n/a % Exist. Building - n/a s.f. Proposed Bldg. -. n/a s.f. Zone - various G.P. Designation - various Assessor's Parcel No. - __ - ~o,~'~ ~_~ If Residential, Units/Gross Acre - various Total# Rental/Own Bdrms Total s.f. Price Unit Type #1 Unit Type #2 Unit Type #3 Unit Type #-4 Unit Type #5 Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check) [] Monta Vista Design Guidelines [] S. De Anza Conceptual [] N. De Anza Conceptual [] S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual [] Stevens Crk Blvd. Conceptual [] Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & Landscape If Non-Residential, Building Area - s.f. Employees/Shift -__Parking Required Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area - FAR - Max. Parking Provided YES [] NO [] A, CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN SOURCES 1. Land Use Etsment 2. Public Safety Element 3. Housing Element 4. Transportation Element 5. Environmental Resources 6. Appendix A- Hillside Development 7. Land Use Map 8. Noise Element Amendment 9. City Ridgeline Policy 10. Constraint Maps CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS 11. Tree Preservation ordinance 778 12. CityAerial Photography Maps 13. ~Cupertino Chronicle" (California History Center, 1976) 14. Geological Report (site specific) 15. Parking Ordinance 1277 16. Zoning Map 17. Zoning Code/Specific Plan Documents 18. City Noise Ordinance C. CITY AGENCIES Site 19. Community Development Dept. List 20. Public Works Dept. 21. Parks~& ~e~reati0n DePartment 22. CupertifiO water Utility ~ D. ouTSIDE AGENCIES 23. Copnty planning:Department 24. Adjacent Cities' Planning Departments 25. Cobnty Departmental of Environmental: OUTSIDE AGENCIES (Continued) 26. Mklpeninsula Regional Open Space District 27. County Parks and Recreation Department 28. Cupertino Sanitary District 29. Fremont Union High School District 30. Cupertino Union School District 31. Pacific Gas and Electric 32. Santa Clara County Fire Department 33. County Sheriff 34. CALTRANS 35. County Transportation Agency 36. Santa Clara Valley Water Distdct OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS 37. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant Excesses 38. FEMA Flood Maps/SCVWD Flood Maps 39. USDA, "Soils of Santa Clara County" 49. County Hazardous Waste Management Plan 41. County Heritage Resources Inventory 42. Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel Leak Site 43. CalEPA Hazardous Waste and Substances Site OTHER SOURCES 44. Project Plan Se'dApplication Materials~ 45. Field Reconnaissance 46. Experience wlproject of similar scope/characteristics 47. ABAG Projection Series B. C. D. E. F. G. Complete all information requesteff 0n the Initial Study Cover page. LEAVE BLANK SPACES,-;,- ONLY WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLICABLE. ~. ' - Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete, the checklist information in Categories A through O. You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s) in the "Source" column next to the question to which they relate. If you check any of the 'YES" response to any questions, you must attach a sheet explaining the potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed. When explaining any yes response, label your answer clearly (Example "N - 3 Historical") Please try to respond concisely, and place as many explanatory responses as possible on each page. Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the Preparer's Affidavit. Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City. v/Project Plan Set of Legislative Document ¢'Location map with site clearly marked (when applicable) [and Supporting Information Sources] ,~ ~ E ~ ._-" o ~ .~_E _E III. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of [] [] [] [] the applicable air quality plan? [5,37,42,44] b) Violate any air quality standard or [] [] [] r~ contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? [5,37,42,44] c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net [] [] [] [] increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard(including re eaS ng em!~si0ns' i , · which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precurs0rs~~i4137144] ' d) Expose sensi'~ive receptors to substantiai ~[], [] [] i [] J pollutant concentrationS~ [4137,44] .... "' -'~ e) Create objectionable 0d0m a~fecting a [] [] [] r'~l- substantial number0f people? [~4,37,44]- ' ~ . ,-: .' IV, BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: ' ' ; ' a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either [] [] [] [] directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any [] [] [] [] riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] c) Have a substantial adverse effect on [] [] [] [] federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act I (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? [20,36,44] d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? [5,10,12,21,26] e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? [11,12,41] f) Conflict with the provisions of an :adopted: Habitat Conservation Plan,.Natural~ ,. Community Conservation Plan or othe[ approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? [5,10,26,27] V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -~,Would the, project: a) Cause a substantial adverse'change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in {}15064.5? [5,13,41] b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to {}15064.5? [5,13,41] c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? [5,13,41] d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? [1,5] VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo I Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the [and Supporting Information Sources] State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. [2,14,44] ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? [2,5,10,44] iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? [2,5,10,39,44] iv) Landslides? [2,5,10,39,44] b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? [2,5,10,44] c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstabi~ as a resu t of the project, and potenii~lly ~:~sult in on- or off-site landslide, lateral sprea.ding subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?' [2,5,10,39] d) Be located on expansive soil, a~ defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code 1997), creat ng substantial r sks to life qr.~ 10] property? [2 5 e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanl~s 9r ~.. :... alternative waste water d sposal syster0s where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?. [6,9,36,39] VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? [32,40,42,43,44] b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? [32,40,42,43,44] c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, , substances, or waste within one-quarter mile ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] I of an existing or proposed school? i[2,29,30,40,44] d) Be located on a site which is included on a ,list of hazardous materials sites compiled )ursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? [2,42,40,43] e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] f) For a project within the vicinity of a pr!y~te airstrip, would the project result in a saf,ety . hazard for people residing or Working i~ the': )roject area? [ ] 9) Impair implementation of or physically. ~. interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuatiOn.' ,' ~lan? [2,32,33,44] " " h) Expose people or structures to a significant dsk of Ioss~ injury or death ,:. ' ' involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized are~"or~' where residences are intermixed with wildlands?[1,2,44] VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? [20,36,37] b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? [20,36,42] / SSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? [20,36,42] f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? [20,36,37] g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? [2,38] h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? [2,38] i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? [2,36,38] j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? [2,36,38] IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? [7,12,22,41] b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [1,7,8,16,17,18,44] c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? [1,5,6,9,26] X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to [and Supporting Information Sources] I the region and the residents of the state? [5,10] b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? [5,10] XI. NOISE -- Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? [8,18 44] b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? [8,18,44] c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above leVel§ existing without the project? 8,18] d) A subStantial temporary or periodic ncrease in ambient noise levels in the )roject vicinity above levels existing without the project? [8,18,44] e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [8,18,44] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people ' residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [8,18] Xll, POPULATION AND HOUSING' -- Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or j indirectly (for example, through extension of j roads or other infrastructure)? [3,16,47,44] ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] Xlll. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the constructior~ 0f which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable serVice ratios, response times or other per[ormance objectives for any of the public services: Fir~ protection? [19,32,44] Police protection? [33,44] Sch0~is? i29,30,44] Parks? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] Other public facilities? [19,20,44] XlV. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? [5,44] XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the proJect: la) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic i[and u~ .... = ~ ~o ~ Supporting Information Sources] load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? [4,20,35,44] b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, [] ~' [] [] a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? [4,20,44] c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, [] [] [] [] including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? [4,?] d) Substantially increase hazards due to a [] [] [] [] design feature (e.g, sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [20,35,44] e) Result in inadequate emergency access?, [] [] [] [] [2,19,32,33,44] f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? [] [] [] [] [17,44] g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or [] [] [] [] programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [4,34] XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment [] [] [] [] requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? [5,22,28,36,44] b) Require or result in the construction of [] [] [] [] new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [36,22,28,36] c) Require or result in the construction of [] [] [] [] new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [5,22,28,36,44] [and Supporting Information Sources] ~.-~ --Ee~ 'E~ '~ ._'--- o" ~ ~ E E ,e) Result in a determination by the [] [] [] [] wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? [5,22,28,36,44] 0 Be served by a landfill with sufficient [] [] [] [] permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? [?] g) Comply with federal, state, and local [] [] [] [] statutes and regulations related to solid waste? [?] XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE (To be completed by City Staff} a) Does the project have the potential to [] [] [] [] degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? I] b) Does the project have impacts that are [] [] [] [] individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when vieWed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental [] [] []'~ r effects which will cause substantial adverse , ... effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? FI PREPARER'S AFFIDAVIT I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appropriate source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. I hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of such delay or discontinuance. Preparer's Signature Print Preparer's Name ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (To be Completed by City Staff) ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [] Aesthetics [] Agriculture Resources [] Air Quality [] Biological Resources [] Cultural Resources [] Geology/Soils [] Hazards & Hazardous [] Hydrology / Water [] Land Use / Planning Materials Quality [] Mineral Resources [] Noise [] Population / Housing [] Public Services [] Recreation [] Transportation/Traffic [] Utilities / Service [] Mandatory Findings of Systems Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds that: [] The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be: prepared. [] Although the proposed project C0u!d have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [] Th~ proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1 ) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [] Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Staff Evalua~:~ (".,/ ERC Chairperson Date Date Urban Pockets Annexation Estimates lO-2O-97 Garden Monta Rancho Gate Vista Rinconada Total Impact on City Revenues Utility tax - PG&E 10,714 6,998 ' 43,315 · 61,027 Utility tax - Phone 4,821 3,149 19,492 27,462 Franchise Fee - Garbage 7,976 5,210 32,248: 45,435 Franchise Fee - Water 2,464 Franchise Fee - PG&E Franchise Fee - TCI Motor Vehicle Gas Tax SubVention Property tax 8,928 1,449 8,966 ' 12,879 5,832 36,096 ! 50,856 900 , 630 I 3,780 40,400 ! 28,280 ~ 169,680 30,441 15,700 21,308 I 127,851 8,856 47,494 5,310 238,360 179,600 72,049 Total Estimated Revenue Impact on City Expenditures Law Enforcement Code Enforcement (Officer and car) Public Works Street Trees Street Sweeping Leaf Pickup Storm $122,344 63,559 10,000 9,600 1,620 15,000 4,000 $81,7131 $488,922 44,492 7,000 266,949 42,000 38,400 6,480 60,000 16,000 $692,978 , · 375,000 59,000 48,000 8,100 75,000 20,000 Street Lights , 3,360 0 13,440 16,800 Curbs, Gutters & Sidewalks 6;100 0 24,400 30,500 Street Maintenance 18,460 0 73,840 I 92,300 Total Estimated Expenditures $131,699 $51,492 $541,509i $724,7001 I $30,221 I Net Cost Per Year -$9,3561 -$52,5871 -$31,7221 Per Santa Clara County Sheriff Department I Per Public Works Department. Monta Vista streets are akeady annexed to City so there is no new right-of-~vay costs. [ [ t I Urban Pockets I i I. Annexation Estimates ~!' 1~ ' 10-20-97 i ! ! : Garden , Monta Rancho i Gate Vista Rinconada I Total Revenue Assumptions: I. No new sales tax - purchase patterns kn place , : i 2. Number of Households ; 372 i 243 i 1504 3. Property Tax: ! [ ; Total assessed vahie I 71,363,222! 40,252,8421 215,880,2981 x 1% tax rate ! 713,632! 402,528~ 2,158,803i x Cupertino's share ~ 2.2% $15,7001 $8,8561 $47,494i 4. Utility Tax. PG&E: I [ [ Avg rate of $I.,200' I-II-I * 2.4% I 10,714i 6,9981 43,315[ 5. Utility Tax - Phone i [ Avg rate of $540' HI-I * 2.4% ! 4,821 3,1491 19,492i 6. Garbage Franchise: 1 One can rate of $14.89'12'H1t*12% $7,976[ $5,210~, $32,248! 7. Water Franchise: t I I Avg rate of $276 * 8% incr * 2%fee * HI-I II $1,4491 $8,9661 Avg rate of $276 * 20% incr * 2%fee * HIt I $2,464} 8. PG&E Franchise: $8,928 Avg rote of $1,200' HI-I * 2% $5,832l $36,096 9.Motor Vehicle t $40.40/pop * population projection $40,4012 $28,2801 $169,680' 10.Population projection 1,00C 7001 4,200 11.TCI Franchise 5%*60%*$30*pop $900 $6301 $3,780 exceBannexatlon ~f urban pockets I CITY OF CUPERTINO NEGATIVE DECLARATION As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1973, and amended on March 4, 1974, January 17 1977, May 1, 1978, and July 7, 1980, the following described project was granted a Negative Declaration by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on February 2, 2004. PROIECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION EA-2003-17 Application No.: Applicant: Location: SP-2001-05, Monta Vista 02-07 City of Cupertino Monta Vista DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST The annexation to the City of Cupertino of 43.41 acres of unincorporated residential, commercial and industrial developed property generally bounded by Stevens Creek Boulevard, the Union Pacific Railroad tracks, Blackberry Farm and McClellan Road, commonly know as Monta Vista. Detachment of same territory within the Santa Clara County Lighting Service District. FINDINGS OF DECISIONMAKING BODY The City Council granted a Negative Declaration since the project is consistent with the General Plan and there are no significant environmental impacts. Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on City Clerk g/erc/negEA200317 CUPEP TINO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3220 FAX: (408) 777-3366 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT Agenda Item No. t D SUMMARY Meeting Date: February 2, 2004 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Review and approve mid-year budget adjustments for fiscal year 2003/04. BACKGROUND At the January 20th City Council meeting, staff proposed midyear budget adjustments in the amount of $3.2 million dollars. Council adopted staff recommendations with the exception of $24,000 in charges for actual costs associated with community festivals. Staff was asked to bring additional budget cuts back to Council to replace this proposed revenue source. In lieu of charging for festivals, staff proposes the following adjustments for Council consideration: Election cost savings $10,000 Reduce Community Congress budget $10,000 Reduce Telecommunication Legal budget $ 4,000 Total $24,000 RECOMMENDATION It is the staff recommendation that the City Council approve the above adjustments. Submitted by: Ca~'ol A. Atwood Director of Administrative Services Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager G/Finance/Midyear Budget Adjustment 2.Doc Printed on Recycled Paper [ 0~1 Policy Criteria If Council prefers to allow donor recognition artifacts, staff recommends that such artifacts (bricks, tiles, plaques, etc.) be limited to City Center Park only and that the following criteria and provisions be used as the basis for a policy to guide the approval of such an installation: · Donor organizations would be limited to public school districts only (i.e., De Anza-Foothill Community College, Cupertino Union, Fremont Union High School) Installing artifacts should be limited to City Center Park only and the City exclusively will determine what space in the park is available and direct and approve the appearance and specifications for any donor artifact The public school entity should bear all cost associated with installing the artifacts including but not limited to the design, fabrication, installation and any other incidental expenses associated with the installation · No installation of a combination of tiles, bricks, etc. should be permitted that would form a mosaic · The City should reserve the exclusive right to remove the donor artifacts as it deems appropriate. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Consider allowing donor recognition artifacts, and i£ Council decides to do so, direct staff to develop guidelines for approving and installing donor artifacts in City Center Park. at'on Authority Santa Clara Valley Transport ' Ad-Hoc Re~ iring PropO~l Committee City of Milpitas Proposal November 6, 2003 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Ad-Hoc Restructuring PropoSal Committee City of Milpitas Proposal November 6, 2003 Purpose of Proposal · Representation for all jurisdictions while retaining San Jose and County voting proportions · Reduce current inequities · More Countywide input in VTA · Increase support for VTA services and policies · Additional authority for VTA Board The Proposal One seat per city San Jose 5 seats; County 2 seats Total 21 voting members, no alternates · Wei(,;I hted voting The Proposal Current · PrOposal % of % of . No. No. Total No. Weighted Total Directors Votes Votes Directors VOtes Votes l~an J. ose 5 5 0.42 5 15 0.43 s.c. County 2 2 0.17 2 6 0.17 Other Cities 5 5 0.42 14 14 0.40 Total 12 t2 1.00 21 35 1.00 Features · A positive proposal · Direct representation for all jurisdictions. · Allow all cities to actively participate in VTA actions · Increase regional cooperation · Allow cities to more proactively respond to changes within their jurisdiction. Features · Greater ownership and suppoPt countyWide on VTA projects, services and policies. · Funding limitations dramatically increase the importance and decision-making role of VTA Board. · Increases Board of Directors authority. Features All jurisdictions can participate in VTA's many successes. Large governing boards can be effective. Improved continuity of leadership. Subcommittee work can be more focused. Concerns "2? member board is too lar. qe to be effective" Value of full representation .outweighs administrative complexities of larger board More effective subcommittees: 7 members rather than 4; greater geographic representation. Broader expertise of board members Other Governing Boards Member No. Board Agency Jurisdictions Members I County Alameda County CMA 14 Cities 17 1.3 million pop. City/County Assoc. of 1 County Governments 20 Cities 21 of San Mateo County 720,100 pop. MTC 9 Counties (Metropolitan Transportation 100 Cities 19 Commission) 6.9 million pop. Other Governing Boards Member No. Agency JurisdictionsBoard Members 14 Cities MTD (Metropolitan Water 11 Water Districts 37 1 Water Authority District of Southern Calif.) · 17 million pop. 6 County Sacramento Area 18 Cities 19 Council of Governments1.5 million pop. San Diego 1 County Association of Governments 18 Cities 20 2.8 million pop. Concern.,¢- .,'?otenfial for partisanship'' Broader understanding of regional issues and needs Greate,r sharing of leadership responsibilities Increased participation and support for VTA programs and policies Concerns "Inequities for middle-size cities" · Sunnyvale and Santa Clara currently almost permanently represented on Board · Proposal decreases vote proportion for mid-size cities (from 8.4% to 2.9%). · Have to share role on board with rest of cities, includin9 other mid-size cities like Mountain View & Milpitas. · Regional organizations require some sacrifice of equity for good of the whole. Proposal improves overall equity of Board representation. Summary · Proposal provides representation for all jurisdictions · Reduces current inequities in Board composition · Provides more Countywide input in VTA · Unifies and strengthens support for VTA services and policies · Increases authority for VTA Board e'y Transportation Authority SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AD-HOC RESTRUCTURING PROPOSAL COMMITTEE Thursday, November 6, 2003 4:00 PM San Jose City Hall 801 North First Street, Room # 104 (Room 104 is adjacent to the Cafeteria) San Jose, CA AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS: This portion of the agenda is reserved for persons desihng to address the Committee on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to 2 minutes. The law does not permit Comrrfittee action or extended discussion on any item not on the agenda except under special circumstances. If Committee action is requested, the matter can be placed on the next agenda. Ail statements that require a response will be referred to staff for reply in writing. 3. Approve Minutes, September 4, 2003 Meeting. Receive a presentation from the City of Milpitas regarding a proposal from the City of Milpitas to restructure the composition of the VTA Board of Directors. Discuss the utilization of the Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) and the Board of Directors' City Groupings in the Board of Directors' decision making process. (Evarzhoe) 6. Select the next Committee meeting date. 7. Announcements 8. Adjourn NOTE COMMITTEE MEMBERS: In order to establish a quorum for this meeting, members are asked to call Board Office at (408) 321-5680 or E-mail: boardsecretary('~,vta.org before 5:00 p.m. on the day prior to the meeting. Thank you for your cooperation. Ih compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), those requiring I accommodations or accessible media for this meeting should notify the Board Secretary's Office 48 hours pr/or to the meeting at (408) 321-5680 or E-mail: board.secretary~vta, org or TDD (408) 321-2330. VTA's Homepage is located on the web at: http://www.vta, org NOTE: THE COMMITTEE MAY TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEM IDENTIFIED ON THE AGENDA 333] Nar~h First ~reet ~ S~n J~se~ ~A 95~34.~9~6 . Adrninistrati~n 4~8.32~.5555 . ~ust~mer Service 4~8.~2~.2~ Transportation Authority o SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AD-HOC RESTRUCTURING PROPOSAL COMMITTEE Thursday, November 6, 2003 4:00 PM San Jose City Hall 801 North First Street, Room # 104 (Room 104 is adjacent to the Cafeteria) San Jose, CA AGENDA CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS: This portion of the agenda is reserved for persons desiring to address the Committee on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to 2 minutes. The law does not permit Corrmuttee action or extended discussion on any item not on the agenda except under special circumstances. If Committee action is requested, the matter can be placed on the next agenda. All statements that require a response will be referred to staff for reply in writing. Approve Minutes, September 4, 2003 Meeting. Receive a presentation fi.om the City of Milpitas regarding a proposal from the City of Milpitas to restructure the composition of the VTA Board of Directors. Discuss the utilization of the Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) and the Board of Directors' City Groupings in the Board of Directors' decision malting process. (Evanhoe) Select the next Committee meeting date. Amaouncements Adjourn NOTE COMMffTEE MEMBERS: In order to establish a quorum for this meeting, members are asked to call Board Office at (408) 321-5680 or E-mail: boardsecretarv(&,vta.or,~ before 5:00 p.m. on the day prior to the meeting. Thank you for your cooperation. IIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), those requiring I accommodations or accessible media for this meeting should notify the Board Secretary's Office 48 hours prior to the meeting at (408) 321-5680 or E-mail: board.secretary~vta, org or TDD (408) 321-2330. VTA's Homepage is located on the web at: http://www.vta, org NOTE: THE COMMITTEE MAY TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEM IDENTIFIED ON THE AGENDA. ~"~~ ~l~y~l'r~n~s~{~r;ation Authority AGENDA ITEM # 3 SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AD-HOC RESTRUCTURING PROPOSAL CONEVIITTEE Thursday, September 4, 2003 County Government Center 70 West Hedding Street 10ch Floor Conference Room San Jose, CA MINUTES CALLED TO ORDER at 4:06 p.m. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Gage, LaPoIl, Pirzynski, Williams Members Absent: None A quorum was present. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS There were no Public Presentations. Presentation on the History of the Current Board Structure Michael Evanhoe, Chief Development Officer, reviewed the events that led to the formation of VTA, beginning with legislation in 1989. He stated that near the end of the 1980's, policy makers and the public throughout the state agreed that the state's transportation problems had to be solved in order to maintain California's economy and quality of life. At the same time, it became clear that adding more lanes of roadway could no longer be the only solution for relieving traffic congestion. The Le~slature decided that a new, multi-modal approach was needed and that the la. nd-use decision-making process needed to address transportation and air quality impacts. This new approach was embodied in the state legislation entitled the Traffic Congestion Relief and Spending Limit Act (Proposition 111) and brought the most sig2ificant change to the state's transportation planning process in over a decade. With the passage of Proposition 111 came the requirement that urban/zed counties create or designate a congestion management agency (CMA). As the CMA of Santa Clara County, the CMA is responsible for preparing and implementing annual congestion management programs (CM:P's). In 1994 there was discussion to merge The Santa Clara County Transit District and Congestion Management Agency for Santa Clara County. 3331 North First Street - San Jose, CA 95134-1906 - Adminislralion 408.321.5555 · Customer Service 4011.321.2300 After a year of discussion, legislation was written and passed in Sacramento that merged the two agencies. This merger created a special district responsible for bus and light rail operations, congestion management, specific highway improvement projects, and countywide transportation planning. As such VTA is a transit provider and a multi modal transportation planning organization. Mr. Evanhoe outlined the current Board composition, five city groupings: Group One (5 Seats) CityofSanJose Group Two (3 Seats) City of Los Altos Town of Los Altos Hills City of Mountain View City Palo Alto City of Sunnyvale City of Santa Clara Group Three: (1 Seat) CityofCampbell City of Cupertino Town of Los Gatos City of Monte Sereno City of Saratoga Group Four: (1 Seat) CityofGikoy City of Milpitas City of Morgan Hill Group Five: (2 Seats) County of Santa Clara He briefly discussed the foundation of the current VTA Board of Directors, stating that the current composition was created to preserve a balance of power among the cities in Santa Clara County, including representation from the County Board of Supervisors. He introduced three former elected officials who worked to create the merged organization and the current Board structure: California Transportation (CTC) Commissioner Diane McKerma, former Supervisor, Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors; Shirley Lewis, former Council Member, City of San Jose; and Joarme Benjamin, former Council Member, Town of Los Gatos. Commissioner McKerma informed the Comm/ttee that an original intent was to link land use and transportation for efficiency in decision-making and maximum use of resources. She noted the cities, including the County of Santa Clara, were organized into five groups that linked communities of interest together as it was important not to dwarf the small cities and expressed concern that the City of Milpitas' proposal may so do. Commissioner McKenna also cautioned, based on her experience, that the physical size of a governing board will sehously hamper its ability to conduct business. Ms. Lewis added that the creation of VTA, to address the transportation needs of Santa Clara County, also gave the County better vision for land use opportun/ties. She stated VTA AD-HOC RESTRUCTURING PROPOSAL COMMi'ri'mE Page 2 of 4 September 4, 2003 the composition of the Board of Directors was developed to give way to a positive atmosphere for decision-making. Another significant factor in the final composition of the VTA Board of Directors was the compromise with then Mayor Tom McEnery, who was concerned about San Jose's equitable representation in relation to population throughout the County. Ms. Benjamin stated that the city groupings were expected to communicate among their membership and discuss issues of interest going to the VTA Board of Directors. Member Williams took his seat at 4:41 p.m. Commissioner McKerma stated that she sees the current two year Board Member term as a detriment to continuity and discussed the value of longer terms on the VTA Board of Directors. Transportation issues are complex she noted, particularly with the myriad of local, regional and federal issues incorporated into the decision making process. She encouraged consideration of longer terms to maximize representation. City of Milpitas' Proposal to Restructure the VTA Board of Directors The Committee discussed the proposal submitted by the City of Milpitas (Milpitas Proposal) and the desire for representation on the VTA Board of Directors to be part of the decision making process. The discussion included the need to evaluate and u~derstand the consequences of the Milpitas Proposal. Chairperson LaPoll acknowledged Morgan Hill Mayor and Policy Advisory Comrdttee (PAC) member Dennis Kennedy who stated that his city grouping includes the City of Gilroy and the City of Milpitas. Mayor Kennedy discussed his experience with the current Board composition and noted it had not worked well to have one representative fi-om his city grouping on the Board of Directors. He concluded his comments stating he supported the Milpitas Proposal as it g/yes everyone a seat at the table. Chairperson LaPoll acknowledged Palo Alto Council Member and VTA PAC Member Yoriko Kishimoto who supports the restructure of the VTA Board of Directors to include a tr~ giving the transit user a direct voice in the decision making process. Council Member Kishimoto noted the PAC has not discussed the Milpitas Proposal or any proposal to restructure the VTA Board of Directors. Ms. Cindy Maxwell, City of Milpitas responded to the committee stating the City of Milpitas' motivation is to simply have a voice and to actively pa~icipate in the decision making process on the VTA Board of Directors. She added the City of Milpitas would be open to other proposals that would allow everyone an oppornmity to participate in the decision making process at the Board of Directors' level. The Committee agreed with Commissioner McKerma's comments concem/ng the size of the Board of Directors and expressed concern about increasing the Board of Directors' membersbdp, noting potential gridlock in the de6ision making process and ability to conduct business due to quorum considerations. VTA AD-HOC RESTRUCTURING PROPOSAL COMM2[TrEE Page 3 of 4 Sepl;eraber 4, 2003 The Committee discussed the use of the PAC in the decision making process and noted the PAC membersh/p includes the County of Santa Clara and each city within the county. The discussion included a potential re-shuffle of the city groups for the Board of Directors' rotation, as some of the orig/nal comrnonalities are gone, specifically noting City Group Four. Next Committee Meeting Date Chairperson LaPoll recommended the Committee meet on Thursday, October 2, 2003 at 4:00 p.m. in the Coanty of Santa Clara's l0th Floor Conference Room, 70 West Hedding Street, San Jose. He requested and the Committee concurred that the agenda include a presentation by City of Milpitas Vice Mayor Trish Dixon, presenting the City's rationale for their proposal; the utilization of the PAC in the decision making process; and, the utilization of the City Groupings in the decision making process. 6. Announcements. There were no Announcements. Ad,iourned at 5:48 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Gilda M. Grozdanich, Board Assistant VTA Board of Directors VTA AD-HOC RESTRUCTURING PROPOSAL COMMITIEE Page 4 of 4 September 4, 2003 May 13, 2003 Mayor and City Council City of Campbell 70 N. First St. Campbell, CA 95008 AGENDA ITEM #4 CITY OF PITAS C.,.~.v~a...s gou~w^r.r~, M=rrr~s, C,~0-m~.¢.i~4i~¢~479 · www. cLrn/ipiczs.ca, gov Dear Mayor Furtado and Campbell City Council: The Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) is currently faced with critical decisions that w/Il significantly impact the quality of life in every community throughout the County and the economic vitality of the SiLicon Valley reg/on. Each and every one of the residents and businesses located in your jurisdiction will experience the impacts of increased fees, reduced services and a slow down in completing transportation construction projects. Due to the organizational structure of the VTA Board, these critical decisions are being made without the direct participation of all member jurisdictions. Currently, there are nine cities that do not have a voting seat on the Board of Directors. Though Milpitas appreciates the work of other jurisdictions who represent us on the Board, it does place an unequal burden of responsibility on those who may not be familiar with our j urisdiction's concerns and issues. As indicated in the attached City Council Resolution, the City of Milpitas requests that a formal public discussion of the VTA Board structure be initiated by our fellow Santa Clara County jurisdictions. Further, we have developed a proposal to restructure the Board that not only provides a voting seat for all jurisdictions, but also would maintain the same proportional vote representation for the City of San Jose and Santa Clara County. Included is a fact sheet that explains our proposal in greater depth. Restructuring the VTA Board of Directors to provide direct representation for all jurisdictions in Santa Clara County would ensure that everyone has the opportunity to participate in the critical decisions affecting our communities and would provide broader and deeper support and ownership for VTA Board actions on service levels, revenue sources, leg/slative initiatives and transportation construction projects. In addition, since its inception in 1995, the VTA organization has matured and developed a reputation for high quality transportation planning, services and project construction and direct VTA Board representation will allow all jurisdictions to participate in VTA's many successes. We strongly urge your City Council to actively support public discussions and actions to restructure the VTA Board and provide ail members permanent voting seats. If you would like to discuss th/s matter further, please contact Vice Mayor Trish Dixon who serves as Milpitas' non-voting Alternate to the VTA Board and a non-voting stakeholder representative to the VTA Board's Ad Hoc Financial Stability Corn-rmttee. She can be reached at (408) 262-6937 or pdixon@ci.milpitas.ca.~,oov. S~erely, General Inf'orma[/on: 4o8.586.3ooo RESOLUTION NO. 7301 A 1R~SOLUTION OF % H ~ CITY COIFNCII~ OF TEtlE CITY OF 1VIILPITAS SUPPORTIiNG TB]E PROPOSED KESTRUCTIYRING OF TYRE, SANTA CLARA COUNTY VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTI[ORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS ~,¥ h I~;REAS, the Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) was created in 1995 by the California State Legislature by adoption of the Santa Clara County Transit District Act; and 'fi/H ~;REAS, the VTA is authorized to develop, operate and maintain the County's bus and light rail system and to reduce congestion and improve ak quality through a combination of k/ghway and transit capital improvements, lessened demand on the transportation system and improved land use ptarm/ng; and '¢/IiEREAS, Article 1 of Chapter 4 of the Santa Clara County Transit District Act; created the VTA Board of Directors as a 12 member body representing Santa Clara County, the city of San lose and the remaining cities located in Santa Clara County; and WI=L~REAS, for purposes of Board representation, the non-San Jose cities are organized into the following groupings and Board membership: 3 members Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Mountain View, Pato Alto, Santa Clara and Smmyvale 1 member Campbell, Cupertino, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno and Saratoga 1 member Milpitas, Gilroy and Morgan H/il; and WliEREAS, at any one time more than half of the non-San Jose cities have a representative firom another jurisdiction representing their concerns on the VTA Board; and WHEREAS, the V'TA is responding to critical financial issues and major transportation cons'amction projects 2t affect the services, costs, and traffic congestion experienced by residents from all local jur/sdictions throughout Santa Clara County; and WHEREAS, VTA Board actions affecting service levels, revenue sources, legislative in/tiatives, and transportation construction projects will have broader and deeper county support and ownership by the d'u:ect participation of all local jurisdictions in the decisiun-making processes; and WHEREAS, since its inception, the VTA organization has matured and developed a reputation for kigh quality transportation planning, services and project construction and direct VTA Board representation will allow all jurisdictions to participate in VTA's many successes; and Wl3lgREAS, direct VTA Board representation for ali Santa Clara County jurisdictions will allow individual cities to more actively participate in VTA actions and proactively respond to the changes within that city; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY TH E CITY COUNCIL OF TI3~E CITY OF MILPITAS, CALIFOP,.N'L4. to submit a proposal that the VTA Board have 21 voting members w/th five seats for the city of San Jose and two seats for Santa Clara County and the remaining seats dislributed equally to the non-San Jose cities to provide direct VTA Board representation for ali jurisd2ctions. Additionally, the l~roposal would maintain the existing proportional vote representation for the city of San Jose and Santa Clara County by accorrfmg their individuaI votes a weight of "three"; and 60883_1>. 1 Resolufion No/7301 RESOLVED FURT]tER, to encourage our fellow Santa Clara County jurlsd{ctlons to begin a public discussion on restructuring thc M'fA Board for the purpose of providing direct representation on thc Board for all Santa Clara County jurisdictions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6m day of May 2003, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: (5) Mayor Estcvcs and Councilmcmbers Dixon, Gomez, Livengood, and Polanstd (0) None (0) None (0) None ATTEST: Gall Blalock, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: 60883_1t 2 Resolulion No. 7301 Santa Clara County Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Board of Directors Organizational Structure FACT SHEET Proposal · Provide one seated V-[-A Board member per city (except San Jose). · VTA Board would have 21 voting members. There would be no Alternates. · Maintains same number of Board seats for city of San Jose and Santa Clara County (5 and 2 respectively). · Retains existing proportional vote representation for the city of San Jose and Santa Clara County with weighted voting. Each San Jose and Santa Clara County Director's vote would .be given a weight of "3". · Requires amendment to State law and VTA Board approval. Supporting Concepts · This is a positive proposal, It provides direct representation for ali jurisdictions. · Direct representation will increase regional cooperation, allow individual cities to more actively participate in V-FA actions and more proactively respond to the changes within that city. · The proposal allows for greater ownership and support countywide as V-FA moves forward with major regional projects such as BART. · The amount of funds available for transportation, particularly with the passage of Measure B, has dramatically increased the importance and decision- making role of this highly visible and public Board. · The proposal reflects VTA's growth and maturity as an organization. It will allow all jurisdictions to participate in VTA's many successes and the validation of those successes by the voters through the overwhelming victory of Measure A. · Larger governing boards effectively operate throughout the State through the use of subcommittees. · Subcommittee work can be more effective because they can focus on the issues. · Weighted voting will not dilute existing voting relationships and value. · A larger board will make it easier to maintain continuity and will invest more authority in the Board of Directors rather than VTA staff. Weighted voting detail on next page 05/14/03 City of Milpitas V'f'A Board Organizational Structure Weiqhted Vote Calculation Current Proposal % of % of No. No. Total No. Weighted Total Directors Votes Votes Directors Votes Votes San Jos6 5 5 Coun~ 2 2 Other Cities 5 5 Tota M:\Transportation\VTA\Factsh.eet. VTABdO rg .doc 2 Company Addressl City PostalCode LastName Campbell 70 N. First St. Campbell 95008 Furtado Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino 95014-3232 Chang. .Gilroy 7351 Rosanna Street Gilroy 95020 Springer Los Altos 1 North San Antonio Los Altos 94022-3087 Casto Road Los Altos 26379 Fremont Road Los Altos 94022-2674 Fenwick Hills Hills Los Gatos 110 East Main Street Los Gatos 95030 Decker Monte 18041 Saratoga-Los Monte 95030 Baxter Sereno Gatos Road Sereno Morgan 17555 Peak Avenue Morgan 95037 Kennedy Hill Hill Mountain 500 Castro Street Mountain 94041 Kasperzak View View Palo Alto 250 Hamilton Avenue Pato Alto 94031 Mossar San.lose 801 North First Street San Jose 95110-1704 Gonzales Santa 1500 Warburton Santa 95050 Mahan Clara Avenue Clara Saratoga 13777 Fruitva]e Saratoga 95070 Streit Avenue Sunnyvale 456 West Olive Sunnyvale 94086 Miller Avenue Santa 70 West Hedding San 3ose 95110 Alvarado Clara Street, 10~ Floor, East County Wing CUPERTINO City Hall 10300 Tone Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3212 FAX: (408) 777-3366 davek~cupertino.org OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER STAFF REPORT Agenda Item Number Agenda Date: February 2~ 2002 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Review and adopt City Council goals for 2004. BACKGROUND On January 9, 2004, City Council held a study session to consider goals for 2004. Staff has summarized the proceedings of that meeting and updated last year's goals to reflect Council's desires for 2004. RECOMMENDATION Review and adopt City Council goals for 2004. Respectfully submitted: David W. Knapp, City Manager Printod on Recyclod Paper [q~[ City Council Goals 2004 January 2004 Update Project Goal Status Comments 1. Library and Civic Center H Open in October 2004 Under construction on schedule. H Incorporate coffee shop in the Library H Provide timelines and options on purchasing FF&E for Library H Automated Checkout Machines Four automated checkout machines The Cupertino Library has the highest self- have been installed, checkout usage in the SCC system, representing 24% of check-out, or 412,000 items per year. 2. Trails Plan H Stevens Creek Corridor Plan The Stevens Creek trail is a single On Sept. 15 the City Council directed staff to component of the Stevens Creek continue to work on the corridor plan including: Corridor Plan. On 9/15/03 the · Year-round use Council directed that the trail · Incorporating a multi-use trail through the corridor should be · Working with the Cupertino Historical multi-use: Society on the Center for Living History · Reducing the size of the picnic grounds · Changing the fee collection system Staff is working on completing the master plan and seeking funding to implement it. This is an ongoing project. H Construct San Tomas/Saratoga Creek Trail The trail is open. Page 1 of 14 Cupertino Council Goals - update January 27, 2004 Project Goal City Council Goals 2004 January 2004 Update Status Comments 3. Parks >~ Stevens Creek Corridor Park · Support the Cupertino Historical Society in its efforts to create a Center for Living History Work with the Santa Clara Valley Water District on a partnership to complete the riparian planning and restoration for Stevens Creek Corridor Park · Complete the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Page 2 of 14 The Cupertino Historical Society has asked that the Council agree to a long-term lease of the Stocklmeir property and the historic barn and blacksmith shop at McClellan Ranch, if within 5 years of commencement of their capital campaign, they raise sufficient money for restoration. Water District Staff have been evaluating the riparian corridor (soils testing a& biological evaluation) in order to determine the appropriate limits of riparian restoration. Water District staff a re also working on a proposal to fund this project within their fiscal year 2004/05 budget. Staffhas received proposals from consultants to complete the master plan, however, some of the work needed to complete the master plan is also work that may potentially be performed by the Water District as part of the restoration program. We are trying to avoid duplication of effort so completion of the master plan is temporarily on hold pending The board of the Cupertino Historical Society has raised the seed money to contract with a capital campaign consultant, and will begin to work on the campaign as soon as they get the go ahead from Council City and Water District staff will be working on an agreement for review by the board and the Council, so that the necessary analysis and environmental review can conunence. Staff anticipates bringing the contract for consultant services forward by July, '04. Cupertino Council Goals - update January 27, 2004 City Council Goals 2004 January 2004 Update Project Goal Status Comments Complete the environmental review for the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan including a review of alternative trail alignments · Apply for grant funding · Renew the Blue Pheasant lease Rancho Rinconada Park · Commence work on a park for the Rancho Rinconada area plan is temporarily on hold pending a written proposal from the Water District, on the portion of the work they will do. See Master Plan schedule above. The environmental review will commence after July 1. Staff submitted the first grant application for this project January 15, 2004. The Attorney's office has prepared a lease for the operator's consideration. The current lease expires March 31, 2004. As part of the proposed lease, staff is asking for a window of time in which repairs and improvements can be made. The San Jose Water Company parcel along Lawrence Expressway has been identified as a potential park site. The environmental review of proposed park and restoration improvements will need to be coordinated. It would not be desirable to "piecemeal" this project under CQEA. Staff will be bringing grant opportunities forward for Council consideration on an ongoing basis, as the planning continues. The lessee has indicated a desire to make tenant improvements should the new lease be executed; staff is trying to coordinate the timing of work so that re-roofing can occur within the same window of closure. The first step in the process is to realign the city boundaries so that the park is within the City of Cupertino. Once this has occurred, the next steps will be to: · Do community outreach to determine what the park should be · budget for said project, and · begin to pursue funding Page 3 of 14 Cupertino Council Goals - update January 27, 2004 City Council Goals 2004 January 2004 Update Project Goal Status Comments Neighborhood Park in the Homestead area ~' Vallco Neighborhood Park This area was identified during the General Plan process as an area deficient in neighborhood parks. This area was identified during the General Plan process as an area deficient in neighborhood parks. Planning staff is working with potential developem of the Villa Serra project to provide a neighborhood park in this area. A neighborhood park will be the subject of negotiations between the City and developers as the redevelopment plan for Vallco moves forward. } ~ Page4 of 14 Cupertino Council Goals - update January 27, 2004 City Council Goals 2004 January 2004 Update Project Goal Status Comments Youth Issues ~' Skateboard Park · Identify location and funding Teen Commission Teen Center Tomorrows Leaders Today Teen Academy Kaleidoscope The Sk8mobile is on use 4 days/wk; during the school year; it operated 6 days/wk throughout the summer. The selection process was revised and Teen Commissioners have been appointed. Website launched on 2/5/02. The Teen Center is on the bottom floor of the Sports Center. 2003/04 class in progress 2003/04 class in progress 2003/04 class - Spring 2004 A Sk8fest was held on Oct. 11 at Creekside Park- 55 youths attended Marketing for the Sk8mobile included: · Distributing 8,000 flyers to 3~a thru 8th grades ·Using the website · Posting flyers at all Cupertino schools Monthly Sk8 schedules are mailed to 200 registered skaters The Teen Commission was involved in selecting the fumishings& equipment for the Teen Center and will actively market it. Page 5 of 14 Cupertino Council Goals - update January 27, 2004 City Council Goals 2004 January 2004 Update Project Goal Status Comments 5. Pursue "Downtown" Opportunities >' Develop a Strcetscape plan for the Crossroads City Council authorized thc 81% of May 3, 2002, Community Congress block of Stevens Creek Boulevard fi.om Dc Anza amendments to thc Heart of the City respondents agreed with developing a downtown Boulevard to Stclling Road. plan on January 22, 2002. village in Cupertino and 75% of the June 2002 Community Survey respondents supported creating a downtown in the Crossroads area. The Crossroads Streetscape plan went to the Planning Commission in The General Plan Task Force is scheduled to Fall 2002, and was continued to present their recommendation in Winter/Spring enable the General Plan Task Fome 2004. to consider height and setback recommendations. ~ Work with the Town Center developer to plan a The City council approved the Phase One of the Town Center plan began mixed used walkable plan master plan in May 2003. construction in December 2003. 5. Street Safety- Walkable Community ~ Ensure that "walkable city" concept is present in City Center Pedestrian Plan draft The following projects incorporate walk-ability went to the City Council on October components. all City development/redevelopment projects 6, 2003. · Orion Lane-creek trail segments · Rodrigues Avenue - creek trail segments On Sept. 15, 2003, the City Council · Astoria on Imperial Avenue included a authorized the Pedgoike Commission Bubb to Imperial trail to study Regnart Creek Trail · City Center- public access segments fi.om Blaney Avenue to · Tra Vigne - public access Pacifica Avenue. · Saron Gardens - public access · Town Center- public access · Oaks Shopping Center- public access · Menlo Equities -,3 Page 6 of 14 Cupertino Council Goals -update January 27, 2004 City Council Goals 2004 January 2004 Update Project Goal Status Comments 6. Building Community/Unity )~ Continue to offer opportunities and programs to address the needs of our diverse community Continue international film and music series Continue to identify translation needs in our community Hold public forums in other languages for major capital improvement projects Evaluate methods for communicating (electronically and in writing) to non-English speaking population regarding crime prevention, emergency preparedness and civic activities Implement a bi-lingual pay program Assist ad-hoc committee with first annual New Year Festival and Parade (02/03) Enhance interaction between 5Cs and the Chamber of Commerce Asian American Business Council Proactively educate the public on controversial topics such as the 4th of July Fireworks Reconsider the scope of the 2004 July 4th celebration City support for 5Cs programs and ethnic festivals is ongoing. Neighborhood block leader program now supports 64 leaders. Library meeting held on 2/7/02. Senior Center Newsletter is printed in English & Mandarin. Emergency Preparedness instructions are printed in multiple languages. Adopted by CEA and non- represented; OE3 pending contract City funding and staff support provided. Diverse programming is ongoing. · Cultural calendar will be distributed to block leaders and included on the City website. Next new block leader training is Feb. 21 City staff is providing translation and interpretation services for publications and resident service requests. Page 7 of 14 Cupertino Council Goals - update Janual'y 27, 2004 City Council Goals 2004 January 2004 Update Project Goal Status Comments 7. Economic Development ~ Encourage healthy environment for retail growth VALLCO Fashion Park ("Plaza Cupertino") Redevelopment Add revenue enhancement incentive policy component of review for new development Evaluate transit/transportation implications of economic development strategy City Council has approved the following projects expanding the City's retail space by approximately 80,000 square feet: Verona (City Center) Tra Vigne Marketplace BJ's Restaurant & Brewery Pasadena Mixed Use Library Coffee Shop Town Center Menlo Equities Vallco was purchased in June 2003 and the new owners are seeking permits to construct tenant improvements for a 1,300-seat banquet style restaurant. Major projects include an economic assessment of potential revenue generation possibilities The General Plan Cimulation Element will evaluate transportation implications of new development. The General Plan update will consider policies encouraging active commercial uses such as bookstores, coffee shops and restaurants. Re-tenanting of existing commercial buildings: · Wherehouse building o Panda Express o T-Mobile o Starbucks · Carrows building o Flames Restaurant · McWorters/Young tenant space in the Crossroads Shopping Center o Oakville Grocers The new owners are attempting to re-tenant the lower level, add theaters and are evaluating long- range redevelopment plans. HP has relocated several sales offices to its Cupertino location. Borland Software moved a significant Silicon valley office into the City Center. Page 8 of 14 Cupertino Council Goals -update January 27, 2004 City Council Goals 2004 January 2004 Update Project Goal Status Comments 8. General Plan > The Administrative Draft of the Staff held General Plan orientation meetings } General Plan Update General Plan was completed and with PC, P&R, BPAC, Housing Committee, the distributed for public review in business community and held a general the beginning of January 2003. community meeting. } CC/PC study sessions held in February and March 2003. May 3, 2002, Community Congress focused on the General Plan update. ~ Appointed 74 member GP Task Force ~ GP Task Force met from June- October 2003 ~ Task Force recommendations will be presented to City Council in the winter/spring of 2004 9. Public Safety > Review traffic safety issues Monta Vista Safe Routes Project Cupertino High School grant for $405,000 · Safe routes to school program (Monta Vista completed 11/01 approved. Design Fall '03 for completion in 9/01 and Cupertino High Schools 11/03) Spring '04. Garden Gate grant for $185,000. Pending approval by Caltrans. · Review traffic safety for pedestrians Completed Final Pedestrian Transportation Guidelines to BPAC and Council 3/02 ~' Continue emphasis on Neighborhood Watch 56 active Watch Groups which represent 165 residential streets. Held 55 Neighborhood Watch meetings. 24 meetings were new groups to the program and 31 of them supported existing groups or revitalized inactive groups. Page 9 of 14 Cupertino Council Goals -update January 27, 2004 Project Goal City Council Goals 2004 January 2004 Update Status Comments Establish an eCap Merchant Watch Program Continue emphasis on Emergency Response (ER) and Preparedness · Continue expanding of the CERT program · Hold a Mandarin CERT information class to assess interest in a Mandarin CERT class · Develop High School ER Training · Ensure ER Training for City staff · Offer ER skills to 6th to 12th grade Provide an alert email system for businesses in the City, similar to the Neighborhood eCap Program. · Increased from 4 to 5 CERT classes/yr. ,, Conducted five first aid and five CPR classes · Implemented a Disaster Council/Citizen Corps Council · Organized two new neighborhood CERT teams. · Scheduled for Spring 2004 · Developed a model ER program with Monta Vista High School students · Updated Emergency Plan 12/02 · Mandated SEMS training; First Aid and CPR to staff · Conducts on-going EOC drills Offer Kaleidoscope Program 3 times/year Total of 500 residents trained in CERT. Total of 200 citizens trained. Enables community members to participate in emergency planning. Total of 10 neighborhoods trained. Total of 150 students trained to date. Page 10 of 14 Cupertino Council Goals -update January 27, 2004 City Council Goals 2004 January 2004 Update Project Goal Status Comments · Develop City Evacuation Plan · Ensure ER Training for business/schools Expand Volunteer Program · Project begins early 2003 · Meet monthly with local business/school emergency planners and District officials 3ngoing expansion of volunteer programs with Leadership Cupertino, TLT, CERT and Neighborhood Watch. Sheriff's volunteer program in Cupertino has begun. Five volunteers work on the Neighborhood Watch program exclusively. E-mail system to Neighborhood Watch participants was activated and to date we have 1200 e-mail alert subscribers. Page 11 of 14 Cupertino Council Goals - update January 27, 2004 City Council Goals 2004 January 2004 Update Project Goal Status Comments 1 o. Affordable Housing > Provide housing opportunities for Cupertino The2001HousingElement The Santa Clara County Housing Trust Home workers increased the BMR requirement Ownership Assistance Program is applicable to fi.om 10% to 15%, and identified Cupertino teachers and other public service sites for an additional housing units, workers. ~ Review Below Market Rate Program criteria BMR manual was updated in November 2002. ~ Teacher housing assistance programs City Council appropriated $220,000 City has contracted with Neighborhood Housing · Develop teacher housing assistance program for a down payment assistance Services of Silicon Valley to implement the (9/02) program for teachers in May 2003. teacher outreach program in December 2003. ~ CCS Affordable Housing Project CCS 24 unit affordable housing units and offices were completed in January 2003 11. Annexation ~ Monta Vista Monta Vista annexation process will In Ju!y '02 staffbegan the process of be evaluated in Winter/Spring 2004. coordinating with Santa Clara County, preparing · Annex pockets using island annexation procedures (6/02) maps and identifying issues that need to be addressed in the "Annexation Answer Book." On January 5, 2004, the Council set Febmary 2, 2004 as the protest hearing date. )~ Creston Lot by lot Creston annexations are · Annex individual contiguous parcels when on-going when major redevelopment redevelopment occurs of a home is proposed. > Pursue annexation of the land under the San Toma/Saratoga Creek Trail ~.~ Page 12 of 14 Cupertino Council Goals - update Janua~ 27, 2004 City Council Goals 2004 January 2004 Update Project Goal Status Comments ] 12. Sports Center Building Strategy Under construction. ~ Complete ADA requirements and various other Reopening scheduled for Feb. '04. Opening January 10, 2004. modifications and upgrades 13. City Center Park and Intersection "Gateway" Under construction. Completion scheduled for ^pril '04. 14. School Partnerships The Teacher Down Payment ~ Pursue partner opportunities with the three school Assistance program has been districts including: approved. * Pool Staff is working on a Senior/Teacher · Gym Matching program. · Traffic and parking The Public Safety Commission is · Teacher housing working on improving traffic in the tri-schools neighborhood. The Safe Routes to Schools projects have proceeded with excellent cooperation between the City and Monta Vista, Cupertino and Garden Gate. When completed, we use the Cupertino field house as available. De Anza/City recycling program - the City gives De Anza used Page 13 of 14 Cupertino Council Goals - update January 27, 2004 City Council Goals 2004 January 2004 Update Project Goal Status Comments computers and De Anza refurbishes them. · School Resource Officers Added second SRO in FY 2003/04 · Youth Probation Officer Updated contract in FY 2003/04 15. Senior Issues ~ Explore Senior Commission Resolution establishing the Senior Commission approved. Interviews in January 16. Internal Improvements > Implement Access Cupertino to enhance customer Completed service response times > Implement e-mail response policy for Mayor and Completed Councilmembers > Notify Council of major events/activities including Master calendar in progress block parties ~ Add time component to video streaming Completed > Consider consolidating CDBG and Human Service funding processes > Perform an audit on the CCS housing allocation Contract with Maze & Associates process approved. Audit performed in March '04 ~,~ Page 14 of 14 Cupertino Council Goals - update Janua~ 27, 2004 CITY OF CUPEP TINO P~rk~ ~n~ R~r~tifln D?~rtm~n! STAFF REPORT Agenda Item Number Agenda Date: February 2, 2004 SUBJECT Adopt Resolution No. 04- 2~ expressing intent to enter into a long-term, no-cost lease with Cupertino Historical Society (CHS) for renovation, occupation, and management of the Stocklmeir property and the historic barn and blacksmith shop at McClellan Ranch Park, upon reaching fundraising goals. BACKGROUND Historic interpretation emerged as a goal for Stevens Creek Corridor Park during the communitywide visioning exercise conducted last year. The CHS's Board of Directors has directed their Executive Director to move forward with plans for a history center at the Stocklmeir house, and exhibits and programs at the barn and blacksmith shop within McClellan Ranch. To implement the vision, CHS desires to renovate the facilities. CHS's plans are consistent with the community vision for Stevens Creek Corridor Park, City Council goals, and the McClellan Ranch Park Master Plan. Members of the CHS have indicated that they want to partner with the City in providing a cultural history component to the natural history offerings currently available at McClellan Ranch. The Executive Director has forwarded the attached proposal for Council's consideration. CHS will hire a capital campaign consultant who will begin to develop a capital campaign plan for approximately $4 million. CHS will raise funds for the renovation of the facilities over the next three to five years. The capital campaign plan may identify phases for implementation of the overall plan. For example: CHS may determine that renovating the barn as a first-phase project may build momentum for the rest of the campaign. Critical to CHS's efforts is an assurance from the Council that they will be able to enter into a long-term, no-cost lease for managing the facilities for historic and other educational purposes after the funds are raised. Christine Jeffers will be at the meeting to address the Council and discuss her Board's vision and plans. Staff and CHS requests that the Council adopt the Resolution next in order expressing intent to enter into a no-cost, 30-year lease with CHS for use of the facilities, after the funds are raised. January 5, 2004 Page 2 of 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution next in order expressing intent to enter imo a 30-year, no-cost lease agreement with the Cupertino Historical Society for renovation, occupation, and management of the Stocklmeir property and the barn and blacksmith shop at McClellan Ranch upon achievement of fundraising goals within the next three to five years. SUBMITTED BY: Therese Ambrosi Smith, Director Parks and Recreation Department APPROVED FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY COUNCIL: David W. Knapp City Manager G:\Parks and Recreation Admin\Historical Society\CHS lease staffreport & reso.doc DRAFT RESOLUTION NO; 04-259 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO EXPRESSING INTENT TO ENTER INTO A LONG-TERM, NO°COST LEASE WITH THE CUPERTINO HISTORICAL SOCIETY TO OCCUPY AND MANAGE HISTORIC STRUCTURES WiTHIN THE STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR UPON ACHIEVEMENT OF FUNDRAIS1NG GOALS WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino conducted a communitywide visioning exercise to plan for the future use of its properties in the Stevens Creek Corridor; and WHEREAS, there was community consensus that the area was important for historic interpretation, with special note given the Stocklmeir site and the historic buildings at McClellan Ranch Park; and WHEREAS, the Stocklmeir house was formerly the home of Louis Stocklmeir, the founding father of the Cupertino Historical Society, and the Cupertino Historical Society desires to renovate the house for historical purposes; and WHEREAS, consistent within the McClellan Ranch Park Master Plan, the Cupertino Historical Society desires to renovate the barn and blacksmith shop; and WHEREAS, the Cupertino Historical Society's Board of Directors is ready to move forward on a capital campaign to raise funds to renovate these structures; and WHEREAS, commitment from the City Council t~at the Cupertino Historical Society will be allowed to renovate, occupy, and manage these facilities for community purposes is essential to the success of the capital campaign; and WHEREAS, the Cupertino Historical Society intends to raise the necessary funds over a three to five-year period from commencement of the capital campaign. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby states its intent to lease the Stocklmeir property and the large barn and blacksmith shop at McClellan Ranch to the Cupertino Historical Society for a period of thirty (30) years at no cost upon completion of a capital campaign to raise funds to renovate the facilities, and upon presentation of a management plan that makes these facilities available to the public. Should the campaign be successful in raising funds for a single structure, the Cupertino Historical Society would then request the authority to move forward with a first-phase renovation in order to build momentum for the Center for Living History. BE IT ALSO RESOLVED that the City Council expresses its support for the Cupertino Historical Society's efforts to create the Center for Living History in Stevens Creek Corridor Park. 1_7-3 Resolution No. 04-259 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 2nd day of February 2004, by the following vote: Vote AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAiN: Members of the City Council ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino January l5, 2004 The Cu?enz no H swntcat Socte?y, Inc. 10185 NO~TJO S'reJ_]anq Roab CupeRTino, Cal_iFo~nla 9501q 408 / 973-1495 · FAX 408 / 973-8049 · cupblswnysoc~]uno.cow Cupertino City Council Members c/o Therese Ambrosi Smith Director of Parks and Recreation 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Dear Therese: On behalf of the board of directors for the Cupertino Historical Society, I submit the following proposal to the City of Cupertino Council Members for their consideration. Smcarely, Executive Director The Cupertino Historical Society and Museum requests the permission of the City Council to move forward on a Capital Campaign to raise the funds to renovate the historic structures at McClellan Ranch and to renovate the historic structures and grounds of the Stocldmeir property. The structures at McClellan Ranch will include but are not limited to: the barn, and the blacksmith's shop. The renovations of the buildings will restore the site to a semblance of its original historic character. In order to preserve that character and to ensure that the funds invested achieve the result intended by the donors, the Cupertino Historical Sexily requests a leasehold interest covering the above mentioned s~uctures at McClellan Ranch and the entire Stocklmeir site. The lease will necessarily be long term of perhaps 50 years in order to assure continuation ofthe historical character of the sit~. The Cupertino Historical Socisty will manag~ and occupy the Stocklmeir site and the restored buildings at McClellan Ranch creating hands-on education programs in partnership with the City of Cupertino, 4H, the Nature Museum and the Santa Clara Audubon Society. We are asking for a very long-term commitment from the City of Cupextino for Cupertino Historical Society's use of these fac'flities. Given that, we ar~ suggesting that the City Council adopt a Resolution of Intmt to lease the facilities to Cupertino Historical Society upon reaching the capital campaign's goals within 3 to 5 years of the campaign's commencement. The resolution is important to potential donors. Should the campaign be successful m raising funds for one structure say the bm--Cupertino Historical Society would want the authority to move forward with a first phase of renovation in order to build momentum for the Center for Living History. Page 1 of 2 The CupeR'cmo Hlswelcai $octe'ry & Museum I 3e31careO w ensuRlnq The CupeRTino H swR ca]_ Soc ezy, Inc. Cupe~'rmo, CahFo~ma 95014 408 / 973-1495 · FAX 408 / 973-8049 · cupblszo~ysoe@.luno.com Submi~:l on this 15Th day of January, 2004 by: Donna Austin, Board President Mark McKenna, Board Vice President Darryl Stow, Treasurer Holene Davis, Secretary D. Michael Foulkes Michael Mansch Dov Rendler Stofanie Singer Kayo Steinback Steve Ting Robert Vitro Linda Walkor Jim Walker Page 2 of 2 The CupeRTInO HtSTO~.tcaI SocteTy& Museum I 3eOicaTeb TO ensuRmc~ That The heu,m,e oF Cv~peRTtnO s'ray ahve FOR all TO unbe~sTanb nb sbaee. [ ~-__ ~ cU?e T no__ City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3223 FAX: (408) 777-3366 kimbcrlys~cupertino.org SUMMARY OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Agenda Item No. $'0 Meeting Date: February 2, 2004 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Select dates for Teen Commission application deadlines and interviews. BACKGROUND Resolution No. 02-167 specifies the appointment procedures for the Teen Commission. The Parks and Recreation Department will print and distribute the brochures in early March, as well as including the information in the summer Recreation Schedule and the Cupertino Scene. Interviews should be scheduled in late May or early June in order to interview applicants before they leave the area for summer activities. Staff recommends that interviews be held on June 1, 2, or 3. Please note that if more than 30 valid applications are received, a second step is triggered. Resolution 02-167 specifies that if there are more than 6 applicants in one grade, Council members will rank the applications separately for that grade. The applicants with the top 6 scores will be interviewed. Because Monday, May 31, is a holiday, it is important that the application deadline allow sufficient time for the Council to perform the ranking. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that Council establish the following deadlines: Applications due in the City Clerk's Office: Council members receive matrix of applicants: Council members return matrix to City Clerk: Council members receive final packet Interviews are held beginning at 5:00 p.m. Friday, May 7 Thursday, May 13 Friday, May 21 Thursday, May 27 Tuesday, June 1 Submitted by: · City Clerk Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager Printod on Rocycled Paper [ '~ ~ J CITY OF CUPER T NO City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3354 Fax: (408) 777-3333 Agenda Item No. Department of PublicWorks Meeting Date: February 2, 2004 SUBJECT & ISSUE Adopt a resolution confirming impasse and unilaterally implementing the City's last, best and final offer to the bargaining unit represented by Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 3. BACKGROUND The City of Cupertino and Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 3 (OE3) opened negotiations on April 16, 2003. The parties participated in nine bargaining sessions over seven months. In addition to these formal sessions, there were separate meetings and discussions between the Chief Negotiators (Bob Highbaugh for OE3 and Ralph Qualls for the City). On June 9, 2003, Bob Highbaugh and Ralph Quails mutually agreed to a proposal package (Attachment 1, Column 2). Ralph Quails secured proposal approval from the City Manager and Council on June 9. On June 16, Bob Highbaugh presented the package to OE3 members for a vote. It was rejected unanimously (31 to 0). OE3 cited the elimination of the top four city benchmark as the primary factor for voting down the offer. The top four city benchmark refers to a system which guarantees OE3 employees compensation placement within the top four of 13 Santa Clara County cities exclusive of Monte Sereno and Los Altos Hills. This is in addition to an extensive and highly costly benefits package (Attachment 2). As discussed during negotiations, the City's revenue has not kept pace with these larger cities that have successful malls and/or public utility companies. City revenues have decreased in each of the past 3 years (Attachment 3). The City repeatedly communicated to OE3's negotiations team that we can no longer pay employees in the "top 4" due to our economic situation and the fact that we need local control over 44% of the City's expenditure base. Negotiations resumed on July 31 during which OE3 offered to research and present a proposal for reconfiguring the benchmark process. On October 22, they presented a new proposal which vaulted future OE3 compensation increases to the "top 2 "of 13 cities in Santa Clara County. During the next negotiations meeting on October 29, the City explained that OE3's new proposal costs were prohibitively high (Attachment 1, Colmnn 1). The City also expressed concerns that OE3 appeared to be moving further apart in negotiations based on their new proposal. To facilitate negotiations, the City offered to participate in mediation and OE3 indicated that they needed to consult with their attorney before responding. After the discussion, the City presented the OE3 negotiations team with the attached last, best and final package proposal (Attachment 4) which is summarized below: · 5.874% "top four" salary increase effective July 1, 2003 for 44 Maintenance Workers and one Street Lighting Worker, and a 0.91% "top four" salary increase for two Equipment Mechanics. · Delete MOU provision for future "top four" compensation. · 1.895% City paid CalPERS retirement cost increase · Two unpaid work furlough days in fiscal year 2003/04. · Provide employees hired prior to 1986 the option to contribute to Medicare. · 7.5% bilingual pay differential (when used). · Increase service requirement for retiree medical to a sliding 10 to 20 year vesting schedule (new hires only). On October 30, 2003, Bob Highbaugh sent a letter to Ralph Qualls, which declined the City's first request for mediation and stated OE3's intent to refer this matter to City Council. The City responded to Mr. Highbaugh's correspondence and made a second offer for mediation to which OE3 subsequently agreed. At the request of OE3, the South Bay Labor Council granted a strike sanction against the City on November 21, 2004. OE3 also filed an unfair practice charge against the City to the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) on December 1, 2003. The negotiating teams participated in mediation on January 15, 2004 under the auspices of a mediator assigned by State Mediation and Conciliation Services. The mediation concluded on January 15 without the parties reaching agreement. CIRCUMSTANCES INDICATE THAT IMPLEMENTATION IS NECESSARY Despite the lengthy negotiations process and the City's good faith efforts, negations with OE3 have reached impasse. Furthermore, unilateral implementation of the City's last, best and final offer is necessary at this time considering the following circumstances: · The June 9, 2003 mutually agreed upon proposal package was voted down by OE3. · The latest OE3 proposals appear to be moving us further apart. · The city's offer of a 7.52% increase during the third year of a recession, while facing substantial budget cuts, is extremely generous. · Other represented employees have agreed to two FY 2003/04 work furlough days. · OE3 initiated and was granted a strike sanction. · Mediation on January 15, 2004 was unsuccessful. FISCAL IMPACT: The annual cost to implement the last, best and final offer is $190,110 which represents a 7.52% increase in compensation for OE3 employees. By requiring two work furlough days, the cost is reduced to $166,701 which represents a 6.59% compensation increase. A breakdown of proposal costs for the City's three employee groups, OE3, the City Employees' Association (CEA) and unrepresented management/confidential employees is provided on Attachment 1, Columns 3, 4 & 5. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council adopt: Resolution 04- ,,7..[~ which confirms impasse and unilaterally implements the City's last, best and final offer to the bargaining unit represented by Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 3. Submitted by: Approved for submission: Director of Public Works David W. Knapp City Manager City of Cupertino OE3 Negotiation History Fiscal Year 2003/04 OE3 OE3 Total Payroll - FY 2002/03 2,528,000 2,528,000 1% of Total Payroll 25,280 25,280 OE3 offer on City offer on Negotiation Summary: 10/22/03 06/04/03 1. Salary adjustment at 7.33% but 4.000% 101,120 3.500% 88,480 5.874% capped at 4% for 1st year only 2. PERS adjustment at 1.895% 47,906 1.895% 47,906 1.895% 3. Medical Increase $75/mo 44,100 $65/mo 38,220 0 Dental Increase $75/mo 44,100 4. Standby Pay Increase 0 $25/mo 2,400 0 5. Medicare - pre 1986 employees 0 0 6. Bi-Lingual Pay at 7.5% 0 0 Total package before furlough 237,226 177,006 Less: Two Furlough Days 0 -23,409 Total Package after Furlough 237,226 153,597 Number of Employees 49 49 w/furlough 9.38% 6.08% wo/furlough 9.38% 7.00% Note: 7.33% would have met a 12.71% package that would need to be funded in subsequent years g/adminservices/negotiation cost of package - history OE3 2,528,000 25,280 City offer on 1 O/29/03 142,204 47,906 0 0 0 0 190,110 -23,409 166,701 49 6.59% 7.52% 3.500% 1.895% CEA Mgmt/Conf 3,352,300 3,600,600 33,523 36,006 117,331 126,021 63,526 68,231 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 180,857 194,252 -30,986 -33,117 149,871 161,135 60 41 4.47% 4.48% 5.40% 5.400/0 Attachment 2 City of Cupertino OE3 Benefit Summary July 1, 2003 - June 30, 2004 Deferred Compensation 457 Plan Employee can defer payment of compensation up to $13,000. Dental Coverage - $2,000 of coverage for each person per year under Delta Dental. City cost is $95.76/month; employee cost is zero. Employee Assistance Program - Provides professional counseling services for employees and family members. City cost is $6.47/month; employee cost is zero. Health Insurance Provides employee with 5 health plan options. City cost is $666.74 per month; employee cost depends on plan selected. Incentive Leave - Non-vested leave time paid upon termination in good standing provided a minimum of 320 hours are accumulated. Sick Leave - Employees accrue 8 hours/month with unlimited accumulation. Life Insurance - Five times annual salary rounded to next highest $50,000 increment up to a maximum of $250,000. City cost is $.23 per thousand; employee cost zero. Long-Term Disability - 66 - 2/3% of Pre-disability earnings up to $7,000/month. City cost is $.85/$100 if insured earnings up to $50.82/month; employee cost zero. Retirement Plan PERS plan whereby employee receives 2% at age 55 based on highest 12- month earnings, service credit for unused sick leave, military service/Peace Corps buy back option, 1959 Survivor Benefit. City cost is 8.98% of salary per month; employee cost is zero. Vacation - Employees accrue from 10-22 days per year depending on service time. Employees may convert up to 80 hours/year for payment. Overtime/Compensatory Payment - Employees are paid, or can accumulate as leave, at time and one-half for all hours worked greater than 40 hours per week. Uniform Allowance - City pays $400/annual to employees for the purchase of safety equipment. Vision - Provides for regular eye exams and benefits towards vision care expenses. City cost is $13.74/month; employee cost is zero. Holidays/Floating Holidays - Employees receive twelve 8-hour holidays per year and 20 hours of floating holiday leave per year. Survivor Benefit - Provides a monthly survivor benefit in lieu of Social Security. Employee cost is $2.00/month. Attachment City of Cupertino FY 01/02 FY 02/03 FY 03/04 FY 03/04 Budget Cuts to Date adopted Midyear bu,~__.,`~ adjustment General Fund Budget Reductions: Accounting Reallocations Transfer Storm Drain Maint out of General Fund 60,000 60,000 60,000 Reallocated salary/benefit to Redevelopment Fund 145,000 145,000 Reallocated costs to CDBG Fund 55,000 100,000 Budget Reductions Mid-Year budget reductions from all departments 761,553 514,000 Contact services for graffiti removal 20,000 10,000 Janitorial services at Wilson Park 10,000 Traffic contractual services 50,000 116,000 No new vehicle purchases for the fleet 30,000 75,000 E-Govt Phase II 100,000 Conference and Meeting budgets city-wide 150,000 Program Reductions Eliminate second school resource officer 164,000 Park the skate park 20,000 50,000 Eliminate noontime program 10,000 30,000 5,00¢ Reduce contribution to DeAnza PEG channel 60,000 Eliminate 4th of July Fireworks 50,600 -60,00(3 Selective Hiring Freeze - Salary/Benefit Savings Furlough Program 72,920 Senior building inspector 102,989 116,283 Pmducer/Webmaster 75,754 17,500 Maintenance Worker II 45,059 73,500 Maintenance Worker II 73,500 Maintenance Worker II 49,000 Building Inspector 89,000 Senior Office Assistant - Benefit savings only 13,000 Recreation Coordinator 66,000 Traffic Technician 48,000 Case Worker Senior Center 42,000 Sergeant - Traffic Control 46,000 CIP Reductions/Modifications CIP - Gas Tax Programs 200,000 CIP - various proiects 100,000 15,000 ClP - San Tomas Aquino Saratoga Creek Trail 150,000 CIP - Traffic Signal Upgrades 150,000, 100,000 130,000 CIP - Street Walkability Modifications 95,00(3 100,000 CIP - Traffic Calming 25,000 75,000 CIP - Memorial Park Ballfield 150,000 CIP - Skatepark 181,950 CIP - Yellow LED lights/City Center Park -191,000 Sidewalk Contact 200,000 120,000 Debt savings from refinancing/extension 1,388,000 New Revenue Charges 34,000 Total 821,553 1,427,802 2,787,803 1,707,450 Attachment 4 City of Cupertino Last, Best and Final Package Proposal October 29, 2003 The following is a complete package proposal: Effective July 1, 2003, a "top four" salary increase of 5.874% for Maintenance Workers and 0.91% for Equipment Mechanics; however, the City does not intend to continue "top four" salary adjustments ~n the f~ture. · Delete MOU provision for future top four compensation. Effective July 1, 2003, City paid CalPERS retirement cost increase of 1.895% for 5sca/year 2003/04. This does not obligate the City to pay any CalPERS retirement cost increases above 1.895% now or in the future. · During fiscal year 2003/04, all employees will take two unpaid work furlough days during which City facilities will be closed. · Amend S ection 218 agreement with CalPERS to allow employees hired prior to April 1, 1986 to contribute to Medicare on a divided rather than ail or none basis. Authobze biling-aaI pay differential for employees who use bilingual skills ~s approved by their supervisor. Employees must pass a language proficiency test. The 7.5% differential with a 15 minute minimum only applies to work time dur/ng which employees actually use bi-lineal skills~ Increase City set,doe requirement for retiree medical behests to a minimum of i0 5,ears of service credit to receive 50% o{the employer contribution. Each additional service credit year after ten years increases the employer con~bution percentage by 5% until 20 years at which time the retiring employee is eligible for 100% of the employer contribution. In addition, it is the City's intent to change insurance carriers for life and long term disabihty with no material change in behests and to revise forms used for employee performance evaluations. We are available to meet with you to discuss this further. ' SOI UT,ON NO. DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO CONFIRMING IMPASSE AND UNILATERALLY IMPLEMENTING THE CITY OF CUPERTINO'S LAST, BEST, AND FINAL OFFER TO THE BARGAINING UNIT REPRESENTED BY OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 3 WHEREAS, Operating Engineers, Local Union No. 3 (OE3) is a bargaining unit of Public Works employees consisting of 44 Maintenance Workers (I, II and III), one Street Lighting Worker and two Equipment Mechanics; and WHEREAS, the City and OE3 previously entered into an agreement covering said employees which by its terms extended fi.om July 1, 2002 to June 30, 2003; and WHEREAS, The City and OE3 have been negotiating since April 2003 without reaching agreement on a new memorandum of understanding; and WHEREAS, The City and OE3 have jointly participated in mediation under the auspices of a mediator assigned by State Mediation and Conciliation Services; and WHEREAS, That mediation effort terminated on January 15, 2004, without the parties reaching agreement; and WHEREAS, the City and OE3 have exhausted the previously negotiated impasse procedure without reaching agreement; and WHEREAS, The City has in good faith presented it's last, best, and final offer to OE3; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino does hereby: Confirm that the parties are at impasse and have exhausted the applicable impasse procedure. Adopt the City's Last, Best and Final offer to OE3 as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 2nd day of February 2004 by the following vote: VOTE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino EXHIBIT A City of Oupertino Last, Best and Final Package Proposal October 29, 2003 The following is a complete package proposal: · Effective July 1, 2003, a "top four" salary increase of 5 874% for Maintenance Workers and 0.91% for Equipment MecharJcs; however, the City does not intend to continue "top four" salary adjustments in the future. · Delete MOU provision for future top four compensation. Effective July 1, 2003, City paid CalPER_S retirement cost increase of 1.895% for fiscal year 2003/04. This does not obtigate the City to pay any CalPERS retirement cost increases above 1.895% now or in the future. · During fiscal year 2003/04, all employees will take two unpaid work furlough days during which City facilities will be closed. · A_mend Section 218 a~eement with CalPERS to allow employees hired pr/or to Apr/1 1, i986 to contr/bute to Medicare on a divided rather than ali or none basis. Authorize biI/ngv_al pay differential for employees who use bilingual skills as approved by their supervisor. Employees must pass a language proficiency test. The 7.5% differential with a 15 minute rrimimum only applies to work time during which employees actnaI]y use bi-lingual skills. Increase City service requirement for retiree medical benefits to a minimum of 10 years of service credit to receive 50% of the employer contribution. Each additional service credit year after ten years increases the employer con~bution percentage by 5% until 20 years at which time the retiring employee is eligible for 100% of the employer contribntion. In addition, it is the City's intent to change insurance carriers for life and long term disability with no material change in benefits and to revise forms used for employee performance evaluations. We are available to meet wkh you to discuss this further. ORDINANCE NO. 1934 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AMENDING SECTION 2.80.010 OF THE CITY'S ORDINANCE CODE MODIFYING THE COMPOSITION OF THE FINE ARTS COMMISSION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: 1. Section 2.80.010 of the City's ordinance code is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.80.010 Established. The Fine Arts Commission of the City is established. The Fine Arts Cormmission shall consist of seven five members, none of whom shall be officials or employees of the City, nor cohabit with as defined by law, nor be related by blood or marriage to any member of the Commission, the City Manager or the staffperson(s) assigned to this Commission. At least five three members shall be City of Cupertino residents. Members of the Fine Arts Commission shall be appointed by the City Council. Membership will be drawn to represent the arts, citizens and business community on an approximately equal basis 2. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City within 15 days after its adoption, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933, and shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and her certification, together with proof of publication, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of the Council of this City. INTRODUCED at a regular adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the 20th day of January 2004 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the 2~a day of February 2004, by the following vote: Vote: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: Members of the City Council ATTEST: APPROVED :. City Clerk Mayor