U-2003-01b
CITY OF
CUPEI\TINO
City Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3223
FAX: (408) 777-3366
Website:. www.cupertino.org
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
June 3, 2003
Mr. Thomas Brutting
HKlTArchitects
538 Ninth Street, Suite 240
Oakland, CA 94607
Re: Consider a use permit to construct a 24-unit (21,000 square foot) expansion of the skilled
nursing facility and a new 3,500 square foot Fitnessl Wellness Center at the Forum senior
living facility at Rancho San Antonio, Application Nos. U-2003-01 and EA-2003-01,
Thomas Brutting, HKlT Architects, 23500 Cristo Rey Drive, APN 342-54-016. A
Negative Declaration is recommended, and this item is recommended for approval.
Dear Mr. Brutting:
At its May 19, 2003, regular adjourned meeting, the Cupertino City Council approved the use
permit and adopted a negative declaration.
The Use Permit conditions are as follows:
1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
The proposed project will be deemed approved only upon approval of the General Plan
amendment GPA-2003-01, to change the land use designation of parcels on the Forum site
(APN#S - 342-53-00lthrough 342-53-259/342-54-01 through 342-54-016/342-55-001
through 342-55-045) from Residential Very Low 5-20 Acre SID to Residential Very Low 5-
20 Acre SID IBQ (Quasi-public).
2. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on plan set dated April 29, 2003, entitled "Health Care Center Expansion
and Fitness Center, The Forum at Ranch San Antonio," and as amended by this resolution.
3. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Approval is granted for the construction of <' 24-unit (21,000 sq.ft.) Alzheimer care facility, a
3,500 square foot fitness center with a 1,200 sq.ft. storage basement and a 30-car parking lot.
4. DESIGN
Prinled on Recycled Paper
U-2003-01 2
a. The fitness center building shall be moved to the south and west so as not to impact the
existing sycamore trees #6-9 along Via Esplendor.
b. Windows - All windows shall be inset at least three inches from the exterior wall surface.
c. Cornice element for circular towers - A heavy cornice element similar to the eave detail
at the existing Assisted Living building shall be provided for the circular towers.
d. Signage - All signage shall be consistent with the Sign Code Title 17. Alternatively, a
master sign program will need to be approved by the Planning Commission.
5. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN
A construction management plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by staff
prior to issuance of building permits. Staging of construction equipment shall not occur
within 250 feet of any residential property.
6. LANDSCAPING
a. Replacement trees - All the replacement trees shall be 36" box size minimum.
b. Arborist's recommendations - The recommendations in the report by Barrie D. Coate and
Associates dated May 6, 2003 shall be followed. This includes moving the fitness center
to the west to prevent impact to sycamore trees #6-9, retention ofthe pine trees #26-29,
protective fencing around existing trees, etc.
c. Protection plan - As part of the building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall be
prepared by a landscape architect or certified arborist for the existing trees as
recommended in the report from Barrie D. Coate and Associates referenced above. The
tree protection shall be inspected and approved by the landscape architect prior to
beginning construction.
d. Tree Preservation bond - A bond in the amount of$ 115,000 for the protection of the 23
sycamore trees (#1-6, 11-25, #64-68) around the perimeter of the site shall be provided
prior to issuance of building permits.
7. PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
A parking management plan shall be prepared by the applicant that describes the parking
system used by employees, residents and visitors and shall be subject to staff approval prior
to final occupancy.
8. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES
a. The applicant shall install a secured bicycle-locking device, such as a bicycle rack for at
least two bicycles near the sidewalk west of the fitness center.
The applicant shall also implement the following TDM measures for the project that were
part of the original use permit approval for 32-U-85:
b. The applicant shall provide a vanpool program for residents (for off-site trips for transfer
of residents with minor medical emergencies to appropriate medical facilities off-site).
c. The applicant shall provide a carpool program for employees to reduce trips due to
single-occupancy vehicles.
The above programs shall be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to
issuance of a building permit.
9. GEOLOGICAL RECOMMENDATIONS
U-2003-01 3
The approval of all structural, foundation, improvement, grading and drainage plans are
subject to the recommendations and supplemental Geological criteria outlined in the review
letter prepared by Cotton, Shires & Associates, Inc. and dated March 18, 2003, the
Geological Investigation Update by Mactec Engineering and Consulting, Inc. report dated
February 18, 2003, and Geotechnical Investigation by Earth Science Associates dated
September 1988, for the project. Building plans shall include necessary revisions to comply
with recommendations and updated topographic contours that accurately portray the site
topography and siting.
10. NOISE ANALYSIS
a. Noise abatement measures would be incorporated into the design ofthe buildings so that
the interior noise level would be reduced to 45 dBA or less. Sound rated building
elements may also be necessary. Pursuant to the requirements of the State Building
Code, adequate mechanical ventilation must be provided so that windows maybe
assumed to be closed at the discretion of the building occupants in order to control
environmental noise intrusion. The building's design shall be reviewed by a qualified
acoustical consultant during the design phase, and the necessary noise control treatments
incorporated into the design. Usable open space would be situated at a location that
provides acceptable noise levels.
b. Proj ect mechanical equipment should be designed to meet the noise performance
standards at the nearest residential land uses. Rooftop mechanical equipment should not
generate hourly noise levels above 60 dBA Leq during the daytime or 50 dBA Leq at
night.
c. Additional measures shall include the following:
. Avoid staging of construction equipment within 200 feet of residences and locate all
stationary noise-generating construction equipment, such as air compressors and
portable power generators, as far practical from existing noise sensitive receptors.
Construct temporary barriers to screen stationary noise generating equipment when
located in areas adjoining noise sensitive land uses.
. Prohibit construction related heavy truck traffic in residential areas where feasible.
. Control noise from construction workers' radios to the point where they are not
audible at existing residences bordering the project site.
11. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults, backflow preventers and similar above ground
equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground
such that said equipment is not visible from streets. Said equipment locations shall be
determined prior to issuance of building permits.
12. SANITARY DISTRICT
Prior to obtaining a permit for occupancy, the applicant shall provide written confirmation
from the Cupertino Sanitary District that adequate capacity is available for the project or the
applicant shall make the necessary improvements to ensure adequate capacity for the project.
13. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
U-2003-01 4
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount
of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are
hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees,
dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section
66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such
exactions.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1. STREET WIDENING
Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City
Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
2. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with
grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
3. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION
Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting
fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to
adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the
zone in which the site is located.
4. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City.
5. TRAFFIC SIGNS
Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City.
6. STREET TREES
Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type approved
by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125.
7. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter
16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe
required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control
Board as appropriate.
8. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre and Post-
development calculations must be provided to identify if storm drain facilities need to
be constructed or renovated.
U-2003-01
5
9. FIRE PROTECTION
Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City.
10. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance
No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall
coordinate with affected utility providerr. for installation of underground utility devices.
The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said
plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City
Engineer.
11. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino
providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees,
stonn drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for undergrounding of utilities. Said
agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits.
Fees:
a. Grading Permit: $ 6% of On and Off-Site Improvement Costs
b. Development Maintenance Deposit: $ 1,000.00
c. Storm Drainage Fee: TBD
d. Power Cost: **
e. Map Checking Fees:
f. Park Fees:
N/A
N/A
Bonds:
a. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
- The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by
the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of
recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or
changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule.
** Developer is required for one-year power cost for streetlights
12. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures
shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said
equipment is not visible from public street areas.
13. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources
Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included
in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or sediment control plan
U-2003-01 6
shall be provided. Identify aU Pre-and Post development BMPs that will be installed
on-site.
14. NOTICE OF INTENT (NO I)! NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT
The developer shall determine if a NOli NPDES permit will be required for their site per
the Notice to Developers Regarding Changes to Stormwater Regulations (attached as
Exhibit A). The developer shall adhere to applicable requirements.
15, WORK SCHEDULE
A work schedule shall be provided to the City to show the timetable necessary for
completion of on and off site improvements.
Please review conditions carefully. If you have any questions regarding the conditions of
approval, please contact the Department of Community Development at 408-777-3308 for
clarification. Failure to incorporate conditions into your plan set will result in delays at the
plan checking stage. If development conditions require tree preservations, do not clear the
site until required tree protection devices are installed.
The conditions of project approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020( d)(J), these cOllditiOltS constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of
such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are
hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees,
dedications, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun.
If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of
Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
Any interested person,. including the applicant, prior to seeking judicial review of the city
council's decision in this matter, must first file a petition for reconsideration with the city clerk
within ten days after the council's decision. Any petition so filed must comply with municipal
ordinance code 92. 08, 096.
The expiration date for the Use Permit is May 19, 2005.
(:~&i--
Grace Johnson
Deputy City Clerk
cc: Community Development
U-2003-01
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6185
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROV AL OF A USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 24-UNIT (21,000
SQUARE FOOT) ALZHEIMER FACILITY AND A 3,500 SQUARE FOOT FITNESS
CENTER WITH A 1,200 SQUARE FOOT STORAGE BASEMENT AT THE FORUM SITE.
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application: U-2003-01, EA-2003-01
Applicant (s): The Forum at Rancho San Antonio
Property Location: APN#: 342-54-016 - 23500 Cristo Rey Drive
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a
Use Permit, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the
Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one
or more public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application;
and has satisfied the following requirements:
1. The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, general welfare, or convenience;
2. The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the
Cupertino General Plan and the purpose of this title.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in tl1is matter, application no. U-2003-01 is hereby recommended for approval;
and
That tl1e subcondusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application U-
2003-01, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 12, 2003,
and are incorporated by reference herein.
Resolution No. 6185
Page 2
U-2003-01
May 12, 2003
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
The proposed project will be deemed approved only upon approval of the General Plan
amendment GP A-2003-01, to change the land use designation of parcels on the Forum
site (APN#S - 342-53-001through 342-53-259/342-54-01 through 342-54-016/342-55-001
through 342-55-045) from Residential Very Low 5-20 Acre SID to Residential Very Low
5-20 Acre SID /BQ (Quasi-public).
2. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on plan set dated April 29, 2003, entitled "Health Care Center
Expansion and Fitness Center, The Forum at Ranch San Antonio/' and as amended by
this resolution.
3. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Approval is granted for the construction of a 24-unit (2tOOO sq.ft.) Alzheimer care
facility, a 3,500 square foot fitness center with a 1,200 sq.ft. storage basement and a 30-
car parking lot.
4. DESIGN
a. The fitness center building shall be moved to the south and west so as not to impact
the existing sycamore trees #6-9 along Via Esplendor.
b. Windows - All windows shall be inset at least three inches from the exterior wall
surface.
c. Cornice element for circular towers - A heavy cornice element similar to the eave detail
at the existing Assisted Living building shall be provided for the circular towers.
d. Signage - All signage shall be consistent with the Sign Code Title 17. Alternatively, a
master sign program will need to be approved by the Planning Commission.
5. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN
A construction management plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by
staff prior to issuance of building permits. Staging of construction equipment shall not
occur within 250 feet of any residential property.
6. LANDSCAPING
a. Replacement trees - All the replacement trees shall be 36" box size minimum.
b. Arborist's recommendations - The recommendations in the report by Barrie D. Coate
and Associates dated May 6, 2003 shall be followed. This includes moving the
fitness center to the west to prevent impact to sycamore trees #6-9, retention of the
pine trees #26-29, protective fencing around existing trees, etc.
c. Protection plan - As part of the building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall
be prepared by a landscape architect or certified arborist for the existing trees as
recommended in the report from Barrie D. Coate and Associates referenced above.
The h'ee protection shall be inspected and approved by the landscape architect prior
to beginning construction.
Resolution No. 6185
Page 3
U - 2003-01
May 12, 2003
d. Tree Preservation bond - A bond in the amount of $ 115,000 for the protection of the 23
sycamore trees (#1-6, 11-25, #64-68) around the perimeter of the site shall be
provided prior to issuance of building permits.
7. PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
A parking management plan shall be prepared by the applicant that describes the
parking system used by employees, residents and visitors and shall be subject to staff
approval prior to final occupancy.
8. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM), MEASURES
a. The applicant shall install a secured bicycle-locking device, such as a bicycle rack for
at least two bicycles near the sidewalk west of the fitness center.
The applicant shall also implement the following TDM measures for the project that
were part of the original use permit approval for 32-U-85:
b. The applicant shall provide a vanpool program for residents (for off-site trips for
transfer of residents with minor medical emergencies to appropriate medical
facilities off-site).
c. The applicant shall provide a carpool program for employees to reduce trips due to
single-occupancy vehicles.
The above programs shall be approved by the Director of Community Development
prior to issuance of a building permit.
9. GEOLOGICAL RECOMMENDATIONS
The approval of all structural- foundation, improvement, grading and drainage plans
are subject to the recommendations and supplemental Geological criteria outlined in the
review letter prepared by Cotton, Shires & Associates, Inc. and dated March 18, 2003,
the Geological Investigation Update by Mactec Engineering and Consulting, Ine. report
dated February 18, 2003, and Geoteclmical Investigation by Earth Science Associates
dated September 1988, for the project. Building plans shall include necessary revisions
to comply with recommendations and updated topographic contours that accurately
portray the site topography and siting.
10. NOISE ANALYSIS
a. Noise abatement measures would be incorporated into the design of the buildings
so that the interior noise level would be reduced to 45 dBA or less. Sound rated
building elements may also be necessary. Pursuant to the requirements of the State
Building Code, adequate mechanical ventilation must be provided so that windows
may be assumed to be closed at the discretion of the building occupants in order to
control environmental noise intrusion. The building's design shall be reviewed by a
qualified acoustical consultant during the design phase, and the necessary noise
control u'eatrnents incorporated into the design. Usable open space would be
situated at a location that provides acceptable noise levels.
b. Project mechanical equipment should be designed to meet the noise performance
standards at the nearest residential land uses. Rooftop mechanical equipment
Resolution No. 6185
Page 4
U-2003-01
May 12, 2003
should not generate hourly noise levels above 60 dBA Leq during the daytime or 50
dBA Leq at night.
c. Additional measures shall include the following:
. A void staging of construction equipment within 200 feet of residences and locate
all stationary noise-generating construction equipment, such as air compressors
and portable power generators} as far practical from existing noise sensitive
receptors. Construct temporary barriers to screen stationary noise generating
equipment when located in areaS adjoining noise sensitive land uses.
. Prohibit construction related heavy truck traffic in residential areas where
feasible.
. Control noise from construction workers' radios to the point where they are not
audible at existing residences bordering the project site.
11. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults} backflow preventers and similar above
ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or
located underground such that said equipment is not visible from streets. Said
equipment locations shall be determined prior to issuance of building permits.
12. SANITARY DISTRICT
Prior to obtaining a permit for occupancy, the applicant shall provide written
confirmation from the Cupertino Sanitary District that adequate capacity is available for
the project or the applicant shall make the necessary improvements to ensure adequate
capacity for the project.
13. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements} and other exactions. Pursuant to Government
Code Section 66020(d) (I)} these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of
the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications} reservations, and other
exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you
may protest these fees, dedications} reservations} and other exactions, pursuant to
Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this
90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be
legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1. STREET WIDENING
Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with
City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
2. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance
with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
Resolution No. 6185
Page 5
U-2003-01
May 12, 2003
3. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION
Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer.
Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual
interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height
permitted by the zone in which the site is located.
4. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City.
5. TRAFFIC SIGNS
Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City.
6. STREET TREES
Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type
approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125.
7. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with
Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits
maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water
Quality Control Board as appropriate.
8. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre and Post-
development calculations must be provided to identify if storm drain facilities need
to be constructed or renovated.
9. FIRE PROTECTION
Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City.
10. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities
Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of th.e City of
Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of
underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing
utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the
affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
11. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of
Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and
inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of
utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits.
Resolution No. 6185
Page 6
U-2003-01
May 12, 2003
Fees:
a. Grading Permit: $ 6% of On and Off-Site Improvement Costs
b. Development Maintenance Deposit: $ 1,000.00
c. Storm Drainage Fee: TBD
d. Power Cost: **
e. Map Checking Fees: Nj A
f. Park Fees: Nj A
Bonds:
a. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
-The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted
by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time
of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said
change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee
schedule.
** Developer is required for one-year power cost for streetlights
12. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment
enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground
such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas.
13. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources
Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be
included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or sediment
control plan shall be provided. Identify all Pre-and Post development BMPs that
will be installed on-site.
14. NOTICE OF INTENT (NOIVNATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT
The developer shall determine if a NaIf NPDES permit will be required for their site
per the Notice to Developers Regarding Changes to Stormwater Regulations (attached
as Exhibit A). The developer shall adhere to applicable requirements.
15. WORK SCHEDULE
A work schedule shall be provided to tl1e City to show the timetable necessary for
completion of on and off site improvements.
Resolution No. 6185
Page 7
U - 2003-01
May 12, 2003
CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING
CONDITIONS
(Section 66474.18 of the California Govermnent Code)
I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section N. Of
this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices
/ s / Ralph Qualls
Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works
City Engineer CA License 22046
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of May 2003, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: Corr, Miller, Saadati, Wong and Chen
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
I sl Steve Piasecki
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Isl Angela Chen
Angela Chen, Chairperson
Cupertino Planning Commission
G: \ PlmllliJli\ \ PD!\EPOR \ RES \ U-20()2~03 res,doc
PROJCCT DESCRIPTION
::;u'les,1
T:1e :eIll~;nc'cr of -he s'te \vill be
coors amerlli':::5 ~u::h os ITir~ioture
;:JI-cposed to t~e'lOI-lh of the
to ilC:lJdG cur-
Ict for :30 cars is
fro"1 \/;a=spiencol
The FCrlJmorO;ecf
The pro
Health Care Center Expansion & Fitness Center
The Forum at Rancho San Antonio Cupertino, California
Vicinity Map
April 28. 2003
Herdis8r KOrl18tsu Ivelich & Tucker
I
280 f\.vay
,..-~
051'1 Hlll 200
Health Care Center Expansion & Fitness Center
The Forum at Rancho San Antonio Cupertino, California
Project Site and Context
flcrciso!1 KCJmntsu
CRIS~O REY
Health Care Center Expansion & Fitness Center
The Forum at Rancho San Antonio, Cupertino, California
Site/Floor Pion
April 22, 2003
Hardison Komatsu !velicn & Tucker
lll~
IE~n
Health Care Center Expansion & Fitness Center
The Forum at Rancho San Antonio Cupertino, Californio
Floor Plan of Addition
April 78, 2003
Hmdison Komats:! Ivelich & Tucker
I
Health Care Center Expansion & Fitness Center
The Forum at Rancho San Antonio Cupertino, ColifoTdo
Perspective Sketch
!aw~ry 28. 2003
HCHc'ison KomolsJ Ivelin & Tucker
'io.
i
I
70U11151,:::-r f,>eVAfitcN
r--L-l:--t.
Health Care Center Expansion & Fitness Center
The rarum at Rancho San Antonio Cupertno. CalifciTio
Elevations of Ilealth Core Addition
)onLorv 28. 20CJ:J
'lurdison Korrotsu Ivelch & Tucker
D!iJJi ~e0JrON . k"-.
Health Care Center Expansion & Fitness Center
The Forum at Rancho San Antonio Cuoertino, California
Sections
Janumy 28, 2003
Hard,son Komatsu Ivelich & Tucker
11l1'l.!9All0NNOTES
t
/'
"
...""'1-
m
I
\
\
\ CorJTROLL~R PR.OGIlA~MING A!JnMAINTE~IAtICE
____->~~.f~~T:a: ~~~~~~:yT~~,~~;~~~;~~~~~~:;;:~L;~P~~~;;~~T~:~~~~I~~EI~
- MINI,IJALR';i\.OFF.
VERIFY TI-l".1" PROGRA!,1MING IS MATCKEDWlTH SEASONAL RAr~~FALL
PERFQRW ,^'ATERAUOIT SCA$::JNAlLY DURl~;G FIRS, YEAR IJ,jD f..NNUALLY ONCE
PlANTSf.RFESTABLlSHED.
. SCHEDULE\'>'ATER1NG DURING EV,:NI~,GAND t,:GHT.T1ME HOURS
. CHCCKSYSTEI\'. RE3ULARLY FC." OPTlM"L EFFICIErJCY.
. ALL iRRlGATION TO BE ~.0'N"aLlL\<IE SPRINKLER HOADS, om? EMITTEF:SOR
O:J~"LEr;: E'AITTi:RS iN t,~E!\SLFSS TH.~rJ B FL V\~DE
ILl c,EN)S TO BE WITCHED PRECIPiTATION RATES WITHIN A vt,LVE
:~:i'~3 IS DIVI~'~D 5Y iRRIGATICI\ lONES: Et.CH ZONE V{1LL HAve ITS OWr~
TREES WIL:.. BE IRRIGt:;-ED'Iii"'-j.., ~.~15",LERS
'~,\lVI':S TO H!lVE INDIVICJ.'Il.. FL01N A~D PRESS'':,,:: CONTROLER
sYS,",M WILL 1~~C-LIDl::AP.A1N SIONSCR
. IF THERE IS TU:;F, MCSTURE SENsons 'MLL OE INS,AlCE::I
. IRR3AjlClN HEADS AT LO'lv ELEVATlONS SHAll C1J'VI" CHFCKVALVES
. POp.'J,~ SPRINKLERS iN T~jE- 'MLL BE AW'NI~'.'~M cr ':.I~~ <EIGHT
(E) iFE TYPI::.A!.. }~"l SlDE"'J.LK
M:Y!CIRCUl..ATi'?N
PATHS
--;0!~I't..Alffi:R~TH
f1M'TREE
---""""SA.'<.DfJ,lI'I.ol.II
,l,:;.TSM>.E.RETAINI~rw..L
IN~I>f;;;.I>.P.u.s
~
RllBfRTl1RIICOl
~ASW[:lI.llS':t<<:.
Health Care Center Expansion & Fitness Center
The Forum at Rancho San Antonio Cuper'ino, California
Landscape Layout Pion
Jorumy 28, 2003
HCHdiSOrl K~Yr~(rsu h/8licl & TlJc<.er
I
KEfp(el .:l1-AAA.m:.
~---i
/ / Hi! OIS~1l
~(
~c.oMO
"'7
"'"'I
~
: .....--..........:~_.:.::-
y--.::-//~ 0
.::-x:-_/~
-- -x _ ""'""'" 8)
,;~- ------- -----,.,~:>.....-
~Q9
-------
!jI
~'-.o
---..:......... 1O~X'z1..GON
-- ~EAt.
. . I - ~..~..~~~
~i-jL~"'-
-----
Health Care Center Expansion & Fitness Center
The Forum ot Rancho San Antonio Cupertino, Ca'ifomio
Landscape Planting Plan
-
"""
IYlUDIllo'Ul"..M'3IloI1lW>,l1'I'.
1I!AI.l.'iH!!'ill>_ClIlro~
@
III.Ilf~TIUU:1;1
6A&SmUII3.L\~
lanuary 28, 2003
Harcison Komatsu Ivelich & Tucker
Health Care Center Expansion & Fitness Center
The Forum at Rancho San Antonio Cupertino, California
CA!JFo~NIA '~(;"L 1>.'.I'2'OAL'
BlJCrrYE
CRAPEMYliTlE
~ E8 ~~,
l"Hr
"'!-If
~'H
T"'
tZ'~~REAO
:
@
RCBEr<:T LA P.GC:::A
& ASSOCfA T:::S, II\'C
Layout and Conceptual Planting Plan - Parking ;O.81il 28, 2003
Horaison Komalsl. Ivckh & Tuc<e.
I
Health Care Center Expansion & Fitness Center
rhe Forum at Rancho San Antonio Cupertino, California
Tree Survey and Recommendations
April 28, 2003
Hcrcisc'l Kornotsu Iveiich & TJckei
//---------
/' ,
('~I~
~--
, " , " '"
'~,:IJi;;-
, ..~5;
"t~?~
,< ,~. '" ;;
~"" <~~
i di R
E~;fi !
/ ,;~~~t
ll~~
Health Care Center Expansion & Fitness Center
The Forum at Rancho San Antonio Cupertino, California
Existing Topography Survey
illJ!.lIT_1ffiIE.i
Silll:lM.M.K;
JJ:QE1:!Q
fl'f!>INE<'R'SSTA~
llCS=1,,""~Pl.oJ<"""'JEOIPIlfPMro9YLEOOlMlU<
...."""""""OI~...IHS,-_~"""'PI<.l.C1ICE-
=~~1lC!: ~
">o?~ci?-~'i'
b~BkF
JcnLO'Y 28, 2003
HrnJison Konatsu I'mlich ,,\ :[eker
~~l-
~'~-mMeiI
'IIIS~PlN<HASElffi<~ll'1"lIE"'",""",
~"""""""AIO<:I;IIm!STI\It;I_~,..-=oc,
L-n
~r"l
I
c-~~
1
_-----.-.r---'---!
/
/
r"~
!:~Bkr
Health Care Center Expansion & Fitness Center
The Forum at Rancho San Antonio CuperTino, California
Grading Plan
january 28, 2003
Hardison Kamelsu Ivelien & Tucker