TR-2014-54b OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
,,,
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE•CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
C l�J P�R-f��Q (408)777-3308•FAX(408)777-3333• planninqCa�cupe�tino.orp
November 24, 2014
J.T.S. Tree Service
Daniel Soto
P.O.Box 52100
Palo Alto, Ca. 94303
SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL PEIZMIT AC'TION LETTER-Application TR-2014-54
This letter confums the decision of the Director of Community Development, given on November 21,
2014, approving a Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal and replacement of a 28-inch diameter
Coast Live Oak tree, located at 877 Lily Avenue. The application is approved with the following
conditions:
1. APPROVED PROJECT
This approval is based on the arborist report prepared by Michael Bench (#WE-1897A), dated
September 30, 2014, consisting of two pages; and a tree removal and tree replacement site plan,
except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution.
2. TREE REPLACEMENTS
The applicant is required to plant one (1) 36-inch box Scarlet Oak (Quercus coccinea) replacement
tree in accordance with the Protected Tree Ordinance and approved tree replacement plan.
Modifications to the tree species and location may be made to the approved replacement plan
pending staff approval. The replacement trees shall be planted within 30 days of the effective
approval date of this tree removal permit.
3. NOTICE OF FEES DEDICATIONS. RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such
fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions.You are hereby notified
that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and
other exaction, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a
protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will
be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
Staff has made the findings necessary to grant the tree remova� permit in accordance with Section
14.18.180 of the Protected Trees Ordinance.
Also, please note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar days frorn the
date of this letter. If this happens, you will be notified of a public hearing, which will be
scheduled before the Planning Commission.
Sincerely,
t _ -,
���
George Schroeder
Associate Planner
(408)777-7601
georges@cupertino.org
Enclosure: Arborist Report, removal and replacement plan
CC:Deepak and Malini Satya,877 Lily Avenue,Cupertino,CA 95014
��""�
�,,�,.r Michael L. Bench �� ' ; � -.� �
� ,f Consulting Arborist ""°°"""' �'�-���••�=���,
f �,, (831) 594-5151 i:-,:i :' -,<;,w
lr. �,--� ��'"���/<�..
� �,� 7327 Langley Canyon Road '�"""""
Prunedale,California 93907 ��
�,,,.���,�,�, t ---_.
:�.-
A Review of the Request to Remove an Oak Tree
Satya Property
877 Lily Avenue
Cupertino, California
Assignment
I was asked by Mr. George Schroeder, Planner, City of Cupertino, to evaluate the
circumstances concerning the request to remove an oak tree at 877 Lily Avenue,
Cupertino, California.
Observations
I inspected the site on September 30, 2014.
The subject tree is a Coast live oak(Quercus agrifolia). This tree has a trunk diameter of
27.8 inches at 54 inches above grade. The condition is excellent. The tree is located
adjacent to the west side property boundary.
����` g � � �,���- � The bark of this tree is very smooth, which
� �
��� � � � - �� ��� �` �� is an indication of its age. This tree is
�. , �' �, � ���� � ��
� �� �� � �' � �� � a �� relatively young and is growing
..�� � ���� � �.�
� �` , � ��� ��` �� vigorously.
� '��'r� ' � ��.
� �� ,,� � . ���y`�, ��,�` .-�`
" �' �� ,.e�, y i � � � r.
�� °°'��� � � -�� � , ���� The ti-unk of this specimen is 6 feet from
��"� � �4 � ��� � �'� the corner of the residence and
�� � ��`� ��' � � �y e ��� �� approximately 3 feet from the corner of
�;.
��� i the porch.
R" �r��y� � � �
. . � � �� �
=� � There is dama e to the existin wood
� � t '�'��"�_ �� < g < g g
�` �� ` fence and to the neighbor's gate, which is
�� � ,.-� ::
� �� ° located on the opposite side of the fence.
� �� � .. � �
� �' � �
��' �� "�°� �
� �= ���� .�° � ��`� �� � �,u���� Roots of this tree have crushed the
� � m �_�� �� >
a � � �� � � ` @ ? in�gation line and the c�i•ain line on this
< � ��� ��
������ �� � � � �'� � side of the residence.
� � � �;� � �� �
,�� ;�, � � ,
���� � �� � ��� �t�s, �;� ����
�� �� z � �� ����� „�� �� � The gas line from the street to the corner
,
�� �����, ����, ���� � �°�# � �
����-�; , , ��� � � � ���,� of this residence is located approximately
,��`� � . �_�°N� . •.°��.o��� 18—24 inches fi•om the ti-unk.
Currently 1 could sce no ob�ious dama�� tu lhe house or to the porch.
Prepared by Michael L. Bench, Site Observations: 1
Consulting Arborist September 30, 2014
877 Lily Avenue
Cupertino, California
Conclusions
The fact this tree is growing vigorously and the fact that it is located very close to the
corner of Mr. and Mrs. Satya's house, it is likely that this tree would lift the porch and/or
the corner footing of this residence in the near future. If the trunk of this tree were
located 10-12 feet from the residence, in my experience the risk to the residence would be
quite low. In my opinion,there is a significant risk to the residence.
It appears that there is a risk to the gas line because of the fact that the gas line is located
adjacent to the trunk and because this tree previously has crushed irrigation and drain
lines in this immediate area.
Because repairs to the fence could be done relatively easily, I typically do not consider
damage to wood fencing sufficient justification,by itself, to warrant the removal of an a
coast live oak tree.
In my opinion,the risk to the residence is a real possibility in this case. Although it
appears that no damage to the residence has occurred to this point, I am confident that
damage to the residence will likely occur in the relatively near future. For this reason, I
believe the request to remove this tree is warranted.
Replacement Trees
Certainly one replacement tree could be planted in the front yard. As I recall, it is likely
that 2 replacement trees could be planted in the front yard. I did not see the back yard.
Coast live oak(QueYCUS agrifolia)
Chinese pistache(Pistacia chinensis)
Fruitless olive(Olea europea `Swan Hill')
Brazilian pepper(Schinus terebinthefolius)
Hybrid Arbutus(Arbutus `Marina')
Strawberry tree(Arbutus unedo)
Small leaf paper bark(Melaleuca linariifolia)
African sumac (Rhus lancea)
Grecian laurel(Laurus nobilis `Saratoga')
Magnolia hybrid(Magnolia `Galaxy)
Water gum(Tristaniopsis laurina)
Dwarf Fruitless Olive (Olea cultivar)
Respectfully submitted,
--�'.°`µ �e.�.��
Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arborist
International Society of Arboriculture Certification#WE 1897A
American Society of Consulting Arborists Member
Prepared by Michael L. Bench, Site Observations: 2
Consulting Arborist September 30, 2014
u erti no
p
`j�Q �E (�.E��ov�� A.N� (�E r'�-/4GF!`✓`,F!�11'" �t–�'i l�
�;� �� ��l �v�
APp�-I cRT�rJ # `r'(�— �c�i �-- ` `-� 4'
. i��-�,��, C1 ) �8 —;��1�
,� -,�;, ��, -�L�v� �°��-�'���'
��.�.-p.,•.-- :s
�A
• � �� � 4� � _ . �
� ��� � �. � �� �- � � :- � . ,,�, .�
Basemap Labels `� �����'
� �
t � � �� �''` . �: � e I
� Abc Street Names �� ���=:' ' ° � ` � �"� �
, g � sr-� ' ,
� . � �;�;
j Secondary Address Labels ' �� �� � '
i �.,� � , �_ � � �` � H �
� - f _';��. . :"
I Primary Address Labels ��, � � ���
,,. , � �
, � � � .
,M
— Freeway � �,� �', ��, � � ��,
I Basemap I, �� � � 'r i � �
�
I I �°� -- � ,�- ` � ����,
' � Street Centerline �' �� �� �� � �
'E r. g � ,: �.�L,/�Y �y �
.�i�
'Sy.�i �.,. > � �. � ^,.. ' � T ��� '4
�
d
����� County Major Roads ��, ��` ��. �� g��� ,
r� �,. �. � a ° ��.� �.� � �
� �
�
County Freeways � r ���� � � � � `���� � � �
���.��� Right-of-Way � ��z��� �� � � �� ��� ��.s�
���
Parcels I �-� � ��� �� � �� �u � � �
�;� � 4''� �� � �k.� � �.,�
Community Development °�� ��` ���� � � � � � � �
� �
b ��� g�_� � � � � , �
City Boundary � � � �� �° „ ���.� � ��;-,. :�� e �
� Aerials Sept 2013 ,� w� '�x �� �� �$ �fl�. � � � �"� '���' � �
_
3, �
;, •
.
., y
-- - � � . • ��v,
' '�
�
�
� „� �
, � ,
'�� m�s.._��;��d.��..a� ..,. _�-�, f .��,�_. __ �—._•..�
N
SCALE 1 : 823 '
� �1� / f /
50 0 50 100 150 ��a✓�T l.� , � �� � ����4. ��lC
FEET �Cc�!'I e'� G�� �r� � . "
:�
��� �
yn_� ��J- -�.� C,;�.Y S
�ro'�`�.�.�c�.� r�,.a� C�r-��k�ih�-�
.
r _ � �,.. �� l� 5
�.. ._.:,: :,L �
.n. ...__ _._....�..._
_w.,._..,__ �I �/���
�
,
� C� �c�,,� ru
http://gissvr/cupertinointranet/home/mapFile.aspx Tuesday, November 04, 2014 6:09 PM