TR-2014-28b ���
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE•CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
C U P E RT 1 N� TELEPHONE: (408)777-3223• FAX: (408)777-3366
To: Planning Department
From: Kirsten Squarcia
Subject: Subject: Petition for Reconsideration of the City Council's approval of the
Hyatt House Hotel development project
Description: Application Summary; Applications: DP-2014-04, U-2014-04,
ASA-2014-06, EXC-2014-07, TR-2014-28,TR-2014-40, EA-2014-06; Petitioner:
Darrel Lum, Concerned Citizens of Cupertino; Applicant: Edward Chan;
Property Owner: Cupertino Property Development II, LLC; Location: 10380
Perimeter Road (Southeast quadrant of Wolfe Road and I-280, APN 316-20-
094) and 10150 North Wolfe Road (JC Penney site, APN 316-20-094)
Date: November 20, 2014
At its November 18, 2014 regular meeting, the Cupertino City Council took the following
action:
CONSIDERED THE PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND ADOPTED
RESOLUTION N0. 14-215 DENYING THE PETITION FOR FAILURE TO MEET
THE REQUIREMENTS OF MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.08.09
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE•CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
C U P E RT 1 N O TELEPHONE:(408)777-3223• FAX: (408)777-3366
November 19, 2014
Re: Subject: Petition for Reconsideration of the City Council's approval of the Hyatt
House Hotel development project
Descri�tion: Application Summary; Applications: DP-2014-04, U-2014-04, ASA-
2014-06, EXC-2014-07, TR-2014-28,TR-2014-40, EA-2014-06; Petitioner: Darrel Lum,
Concerned Citizens of Cupertino; Applicant: Edward Chan; Property Owner:
Cupertino Property Development II, LLC; Location: 10380 Perimeter Road
(Southeast quadrant of Wolfe Road and I-280, APN 316-20-094) and 10150 North
Wolfe Road (JC Penney site, APN 316-20-094)
To Whom It May Concern;
At its November 18, 2014 meeting, the Cupertino City Council
CONSIDERED THE PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND ADOPTED
RESOLUTION NO. 14-215 DENYING THE PETITION FOR FAILURE TO MEET
THE REQUIREMENTS OF MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.08.09
Also included is the Resolution that Council adopted at the meeting. Please call the
Planning Department at 777-3308 if you have any questions.
The decision by the City Council above described is final effective October 21, 2014. The
time within which judicial review must be sought is governed by §1096.6 of the California
Code of Civil Procedure which is 90 days follozving the above effective date.
Sincerely,
����-
Kirsten Squarcia
Deputy City Clerk
cc: City Attorney, Planning Department
RESOLUTION N0. 14-215
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
DENYING THE PETITION OF DARREL LUM SEEKING COUNCIL RECONSIDERATION
OF ITS DECISION TO APPROVE A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (DP-2014-04), USE PERMIT
(U-2014-04), ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL (ASA-2014-06), PARKING
EXCEPTION (EXC-2014-07), AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TR-2014-28) FOR A FIVE-
STORY, 148-ROOM HOTEL OF APPROXIMATELY 102,700 SQUARE FEET THAT
INCLUDES A RESTAURANT, BAR, LOUNGE, AND CONFERENCE ROOMS BUILT OVER
A 35,800 SQUARE FOOT UNDERGROUND PARKING GARAGE THAT CONTAINS
TANDEM PARKING AT 10380 PERIMETER ROAD AND A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (TR-
2014-40) AT 10150 NORTH WOLFE ROAD TO FACILITATE THE OFF-SITE
IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE HOTEL
PROJECT
WHEREAS, on October 21, 2014, the City Council of the City of Cupertino held a public
hearing and at the conclusion of the hearing approved on a 4-1 vote applications DP-2014-04, U-
2014-04, ASA-2014-06, EXC-2014-07, TR-2014-28, and TR-2014-40 for a hotel project located at
10380 Perimeter Road (Decision); and
WHEREAS, the City Council's Decision was within its discretion and made at a properly
noticed public hearing; and
WHEREAS, on October 30, 2014, Petitioner Darrel Lum (Petitioner) filed a
Reconsideration Petition (Reconsideration Petition) requesting that the City Council reconsider
its October 21, 2014 decision under the provisions of Section 2.08.096 of the City's Municipal
Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all relevant evidence presented by the
parties at all hearings, including evidence presented at the November 18, 2014 reconsideration
hearing; and
WHEREAS, based on the evidence above, the City Council hereby makes the findings in
Exhibit "A", and, based upon these findings,;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The Reconsideration Petition is defective on its face in that it does not offer
proof of facts which, in the exercise of reasonably diligence, could not have been produced at
an earlier city hearing as required by Municipal Code Section 2.08.096(B)(1).
2. Petitioner failed to offer evidence which was improperly excluded at a prior city hearing as
required by Municipal Code Section 2.08.096(B)(2).
Resolution No.14-215
Page 2
3. Petitioner failed to provide proof of facts which demonstrate that the City Council proceeded
without, or in excess of its,jurisdiction [See Municipal Code Section 2.08.096 (B)(3)].
4. Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the City Council abused its discretion
by rendering a decision which was not supported by findings of fact; and/or rendering a
decision in which the findings of fact were not supported by the evidence. Specifically, the
City Council determines that the City Council's Decision of October 21, 2014 is supported by
findings of fact and the findings of fact related to the City Council's decision were supported
by substantial evidence in the record of proceedings [See Municipal Code Sections 2.08.096].
5. The Petition for Reconsideration of the City Council's Decision of October 21, 2014 on agenda
item 13 is DENIED, thereby affirming the original decision.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of November, 2014, Regular Meeting of the City
Council of the City of Cupertino, State of California,by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Wong, Sinks, Chang, Mahoney, Santoro
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST: APPROVED:
/s Grace Schmidt /s/Gilbert Wong
Grace Schmidt Gilbert Wong, Mayor
City Clerk City of Cupertino
EXHIBIT A
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS IN RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION
1. Ground for Reconsiderntion #1 (Section 2.08.096 (B)(3) of the Municipal Code]—Council acted in excess of
its jurisdiction
Petition Findin
The General Plan allows buildings with a retail The petitioner presented this claim at the
component located in the South Vallco area to August 26, 2014 Planning Commission hearing
be constructed up to 60 feet tall. Otherwise, and submitted similar written comments for
buildings may be constructed up to 45 feet the October 21, 2014 Council hearing. Both the
without a retail component. The petitioner Planning Comnussion and the City Council
alleges the hotel project has no retail thoroughly considered and discussed this
component and therefore should not be claim and acted upon the project accordingly.
allowed to be constructed at its approved
height of 60 feet. Restaurants are considered legitimate retail
uses and are allowed in the City's General
Commercial Ordinance since they provide
direct contact with customers and generate
sales tax.
The intent of the General Plari s 60-foot
building height policy in South Vallco is to
promote active ground floors. Based on past
approvals and Council practice, restaurants
have been deemed to be an appropriate ground
floor retail use that supports the 60-foot height
allowance.
Finding and conclusion: It is within City Council's jurisdiction to interpret the General Plan and make
decisions on its implementation. The petitioner has not provided any proof of facts that demonstrate the
Council proceeded without, or in excess of its jurisdiction.
2. Ground for Reconsideration #2 (Sections 2.08.096 (B)(5)(b) and (c) of t1Te Municipal Code] — Council's
decision was not supported b�facts or the findings of fact were not supported b� the evidence.
Petition Findin
The petitioner notes that Hyatt House is an The General Plan's building height policy was
extended stay, business service hotel with discussed in detail in the October 21, 2014 staff
limited amenities to serve hotel guests, such as report and at the Council hearing. The Council
complimentary breakfast and in-room kitchen considered the petitioner's testimony as
facilities. The petitioner claims that there was provided but found that the hotel's restaurant,
no finding of fact in the October 21, 2014 staff bar, and other active commercial ground floor
report and meeting minutes that the hotel's uses are considered retail, thereby allowing the
restaurant and bar is considered retail. 60-foot building height.
In addition to servin the hotel uests, the
hotel restaurant is required to be open to the
public and is considered a full service
restaurant similar to other restaurants in the
Ci
Finding and conclusion: The City Council considered, and rejected, the claim that the hotel's restaurant
should not be considered retail. The petitioner has not provided any proof of facts that demonstrate the
Council abused its discretion by rendering a decision which was not supported by findings of fact, or
rendering a decision in which the findings of fact were not supported by the evidence.
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE•CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE:(408)777-3223• FAX: (408)777-3366
CUPERTINO
October 23, 2014
Re: Subject:Hyatt House Hotel development project
Descri�tion:
Application No.(s): ASA-2014-06, DP-2014-04, EXC-2014-07, TR-2014-28, U-2014-04, TR-
2014-40 (EA-2014-06); Applicant: Edward Chan (Cupertino Property Development II,
LLC.);Location: Perimeter Rd @ Wolfe Rd;APN:316-20-092;Architectural Site Approval
for a new 5-story, 148 room hotel and associated site and off-site improvements;
Development Permit to allow the demolition of an existing parking lot and construct a 5
story, 148 room hotel of approximately 102,700 square feet that includes a restaurant,
bar, lounge and conference rooms built over a 35,800 square foot underground parking
garage that contains tandem parking; Parking Exception Permit to allow eight tandem
parking stalls;Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal and replacement of 96 trees to
facilitate the construction of a new hotel; Use Permit to allow a 24-hour hotel, including
a restaurant with interior bar; Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal and
replacement of 19 trees to facilitate the off-site improvements associated with the
construction of a new hotel
At its October 21, 2014 meeting, the Cupertino City Council took the following action:
1. Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration(EA-2014-06); and
2. Adopted Resolution No. 14-202 approving Development Permit (DP-2014-04)
which includes approval of the South Vallco Connectivity Plan; and
3. Adopted Resolution No. 14-203 approving Use Permit(U-2014-04); and
4. Adopted Resolution No., 14-204 approving Architecfural and Site Approval
(ASA-2014-06) with the additional condition to have staff and applicant contact
Caltrans to consider a direct public bicycle and pedestrian access path from the
existing Wolfe Road sidewalk to the project site along the westerly boundary, in
order to allow direct access onto Wolfe Road and access over the freeway overpass.
If Caltrans approves of the access path, the property owner shall work with staff to
construct the path; and
5. Adopted Resolution No. 14-205 approving Parking Exception (EXC-2014-07);and
6. Adopted Resolution No. 14-206 approving Tree Removal Permit (TR-2014-28)
with the additional condition to require a tree condition report to be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Community Development one year after final
ASA-2014-06,DP-2014-04,EXC-2014-07,TR-2014-28, "
U-2014-04,TR-2014-40(EA-2014-06)
October 21,2014
Page 2
occupancy of the project. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the new and
existing trees to ensure proper irrigation, maintenance, and compliance with the
arborist's recommendations. All additional recommendations resulting from the
one-year review shall be implemented by the property owner; and
7. Adopted Resolution No. 14-207 approving Tree Removal Permit(T'R-2014-40)
Enclosed are the resolutions that Council adopted at the meeting.
Any interested person, including the applicant, prior to seeking judicial review of any
adjudicatory decision of the City Council, must first file a petition for reconsideration with the
city clerk within ten days after the date of mailing of this notice. Any petition filed must
comply with Municipal Code §2.08.096.
Sincerely,
Kirsten Squarcia
Deputy City Clerk
cc: City Attorney
Community Development
Darrel Lum Bradley Syverson
7746 Orogrande Place J.C. Penney Properties, Inc.
Cupertino, CA 95014 PO Box 10001
Dallas,TX 75301-1106
Erik Alm
Department of Transportation Mike Rohde
District 4 Vallco Shopping Mall
Local Development—Intergovernmental 10123 N.Wolfe Road, Suite 1095
Review Cupertino, CA 95014
PO Box 23660
Oakland, CA 94623-0660 Cupertino Property Development II, LLC
c/o KCR Development
Atin: Edward Chan
19620 Stevens Creek Blvd #200
Cupertino, Ca. 95014
�
RESOLUTION N0. 14-206
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE REMOVAL AND
REPLACEMENT OF 96 TREES TO FACILITATE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOTEL
LOCATED AT 10380 PERIMETER ROAD
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: TR-2014-28
Applicant: Edward Chan
Property Owner: Cupertino Property Development II, LLC
Location: 10380 Perimeter Road (APN 316-20-092)
SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR TREE REMOVAL PERMIT: �
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tree
Removal Permit as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Committee has recommended adoption of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the City Council has held at least one public hearing in
regard to the application; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows with regard to this application:
a) That the trees are irreversibly diseased, are in danger of falling, can cause potential damage
to existing or proposed essential structures, or interferes with private on-site utility services
and cannot be controlled or remedied through reasonable relocation or modification of the
structure or utility services;
Tlze majority (52 of 84) of tlie Coast Redwoods along tlie Wolfe Road and I-280 �erimeter^ of tlze site
are found by tlze City's Consulting Arborist to be in extr�emely poor to i���^ecoverable Izealtli condition
due to lack of water or overcrowding. Nine Coast Redwood ti�ees along tlze I-280 perimeter were
identified by tlie arborist as liaving a lzigli suitability for preservation since they appear ��easonably
liealtlly and have no significant issues or defects. Tlzree of tlzese trees are pro�osed for removal due to
the proposed trail patliway connection, wl�ile the otJier six will be preserved. All of t1�e 28 perimeter
Resolution No.14-206
Page 2 �
trees along Wolfe Road are proposed for removal since twenty-two of these are in poor Jiealtl2 and since
it will facilitate tlie construction of tlie patliway.
b) That the location of the trees restricts the economic enjoyment of the property by severely
limiting the use of property in a manner not typically experienced by owners of similarly
zoned and situated property, and the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the
approval authority that there are no reasonable alternatives to preserve the tree(s).
The City's consulting arborist Izas determined tliat the trees proposed for removal are in conflict with
tlie proposed new buildings and site imp��ovements, and, given tlzeir condition, are not suitable for
p��eservation or relocation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of the initial study, maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other
evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this
Resolution beginning on PAGE 2 thereof,:
A Mitigated Negative Declaration (Application no. EA-2014-06) is hereby adopted; and the
application for a Tree Removal Permit, Application no. TR-2014-28 is hereby approved and that
the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based
and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. TR-2014-28 as set forth in
the Minutes of City Council Meeting of October 21, 2014, and are incorporated by reference as
though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
Planning Division:
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Ap�roval is based on the plan set received October 2, 2014 consisting of 51 sheets labeled A-
0.0 to A-0.3, C-1.0 to C-7.0, L-1 to L-5, A-1.0, A-1.Oa, A-1.1 to A-1.4, A2.0, A-2.Oa, A-2.1 to A-
2.6, A-3.0 to A-3.8, A-4.0, A-4.Oa, A-4.1, A-4.1a, A-4.2, A-5.0, A-6.0, A-6.1, E-0.1, and E-1.0 to
E-1.2, entitled, "Hyatt House, Cupertino California, Wolfe Road & Interstate 280," drawn by
Gene Fong Associates, Sandis, Bruce Jett Associates, and Emerald City Engineers, Inc.; and
the City's consulting arborist report entitled, "Arborist Report: Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco
Park, Wolfe Road and Interstate 280, Cupertino, California (APN 316-20-092)," prepared by
David Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist #399 dated August 25, 2014 except as may be
amended by conditions in this resolution.
2. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS
Resolution No.14-206
• Page 3
The conditions of approval contained in file nos. DP-2014-04, ASA-2014-06, U-2014-04, EXC-
2014-07, and TR-2014-40 shall be applicable to this approval.
3. APPROVED TREE REMOVALS
The following table lists the trees approved for removal as part of this permit as identified in
the arborist report and plan set:
Tree # Species Diameter (in.)
6 Coast Redwood 20
7 Coast Redwood 23
9 Coast Redwood 14
10 Coast Redwood 25
11 Coast Redwood 22
12 Coast Redwood 19
13 Coast Redwood 21
17 Coast Redwood 13
18 Coast Redwood 8
19 Coast Redwood 13
27 Coast Redwood 14
34 Coast Redwood 16
37 Coast Redwood 13
38 Coast Redwood 12
40 Coast Redwood 12
43 Coast Redwood 10
53 Coast Redwood 20
56 Coast Redwood 15
57 Coast Redwood 23
58 Coast Redwood 30
59 Coast Redwood 22
60 Coast Redwood 18
61 Coast Redwood 30
62 Coast Redwood 12
63 Coast Redwood 22
64 Coast Redwood 14
65 Coast Redwood 30
66 Coast Redwood 24
67 Coast Redwood 8
68 Coast Redwood 26
69 Coast Redwood 10
70 Coast Redwood 13
71 Coast Redwood 18
Resolution No.14-206
Pa e 4 �
Tree # Species Diameter (in.)
72 Coast Redwood � 26
73 Coast Redwood 26
74 Coast Redwood 10
75 Coast Redwood 36
76 Coast Redwood 13
77 Coast Redwood 24
78 Coast Redwood 22
79 Coast Redwood 12
80 Coast Redwood 24
81 Coast Redwood 4
82 Coast Redwood 12
83 Coast Redwood 30
84 Coast Redwood 22
85 Coast Redwood 17
86 Coast Redwood 26
87 Coast Redwood 20
88 Coast Redwood 14
89 Coast Redwood 30
90 Cork Oak 13
91 Coast Live Oak 15
92 Coast Live Oak 14
93 Coast Redwood 11
94 Coast Redwood 13
95 Coast Redwood 22
96 Shamel Ash 24
97 Coast Redwood 24
98 Coast Redwood 11
99 Coast Redwood 8
100 Coast Redwood 21
101 Coast Redwood 14
102 Coast Redwood 20
103 Hone Locust 13
104 Shamel Ash 17
105 Shamel Ash 11
106 Shamel Ash 13
107 Coast Redwood 22
108 Shamel Ash 23
109 Ever reen Pear 9
110 Ever reen Pear S
127 Pin Oak 10
Resolution No.14-206
• Pa e 5
Tree # Species Diameter (in.)
128 Pin Oak 11
129 Montere Pine 15
130 Montere Pine 32
131 Hone Locust 10
132 Hone Locust 7
133 Hone Locust 8
134 Montere Pine 20
135 Montere Pine 23
136 Ever reen Pear 11
137 Ever reen Pear 8
138 Ever reen Pear 12
139 Ever reen Pear 7
140 Montere Pine 16
141 Montere Pine 19
142 Hone Locust 9
143 Cork Oak 20
144 Cork Oak 5
145 Coast Live Oak 20
146 Coast Live Oak 17
147 Hone Locust 10
148 Hone Locust 8
149 Hone Locust 9
150 Hone Locust 9
4. TREE CONDITION REPORT
Per City Council direction, a tree condition report sha11 be reviewed and approved by the
Director of Community Development one vear after final occu�anc� of the project. The
City's consulting arborist shall inspect the new and existing trees to ensure proper irrigation,
maintenance, and compliance with the arborist's recommendations. All additional
recommendations resulting from the one-year review shall be implemented by the property
owner.
5. CITY ARBORIST RECOMMENDATIONS
Prior to buildin��ermit issuance, the recommendations prior to construction contained in
the City's Consulting Arborist report shall be implemented in the construction plans as
deemed appropriate by the Director of Community Development. Prior to final occu�anc�,
the City's Consulting Arborist shall inspect the site to confirm the recommendations have
been carried out as deemed appropriate by the Director of Community Development. A
report ascertaining the good health of the existing trees to remain and the new tree plantings
shall be provided�rior to final occu�anc�
Resolution No.14-206
Page 6 �
6. TREE REPLACEMENTS AND FINAL PLANTING PLAN
MM-BIO 2: The applicant shall plant replacement trees in accordance with the replacement
requirements of the Protected Tree Ordinance. The trees shall be planted prior to final
occu�anc�of site�ermits.
The final planting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community
Development with consultation by the City Arborist prior to issuance of buildin��ermits.
The Director of Community Development shall have the discretion to require additional tree
replacements as deemed necessary. The City Arborist shall confirm that the replacement
trees were planted properly and according to plan�rior to final occu�anc�.
7. IN-LIEU TREE REPLACEMENT FEES
The Director of Community Development has determined that accommodating the 57
remaining required 24-inch box trees on the property would not be feasible and therefore a
tree replacement in-lieu fee would be required. Prior to issuance of building �ermits, the
applicant shall pay the in-lieu fees in the amount to procure and install the replacement
trees.
8. TREE REPLACEMENT BOND
The applicant shall provide a tree replacement bond in an amount determined by the City
Arborist �rior to removals and issuance of demolition and r� adin� permits. The bond shall
be returned after the required tree replacements have been planted and verified by the City
Arborist.
9. STREET TREE REMOVAL (TREE 96)
Tree #96 is identified as a street tree on Wolfe Road. MM BIO-3: In order to remove any
public street trees within the Project site, the Project Applicant shall comply with Municipal
Code Chapter 14.12, Trees. The Project Applicant shall pay the required fee, prior to the
issuance of a building permit, per the New Street Tree Cost Schedule, for the purchase,
planting, and maintenance of trees by the City. All public trees shall be protected against
damage during construction operations. There shall be no storage of materials, tool washout,
or vehicle parking near or upon public trees. This is in accordance with Municipal Code
Section 14.12.120, Condition for Development or� Building Permit. AIl planting costs
associated with a building permit shall be collected by the Chief Building Inspector, or
his/her designee, for deposit into the City's general fund prior to the issuance of a building
permit. The fees for public tree removal and/or damage to branches and roots shall be as
specified in the Public Tree Damage or Removal Fee Schedule adopted by Council
Resolution. Damage and removal fees shall be deposited into the City's tree fund. This is in
accordance with Municipal Code Section 14.12.130, New Street Tree Costs and Public Tree
Damage or Removal Fee Schedules.
Resolution No.14-206
� Page 7
10. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS
The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard
to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation
of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development
Department.
11. INDEMNIFICATION
To the extent permitted by law, the Applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City,
its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the "indemnified parties") from and
against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified
parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void this ordinance or any permit or
approval authorized hereby for the project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the
City its actual attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The City may, in
its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice.
12. NOTICE OF FEES DEDICATIONS RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount
of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are
hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees,
dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section
66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such
exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino
this 21st day of October, 2014, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Wong, Sinks, Chang, Mahoney, Santoro
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST: APPROVED:
/s Grace Schmidt Gilbert Wong
Grace Schmidt Gilbert Wong, Mayor
City Clerk City of Cupertino
TR-2014-28
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6755
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 96 TREES TO
FACILITATE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW HOTEL LOCATED AT 10380 PERIMETER RD
SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: TR-2014-28
Applicant: Edward Chan
Property Owner: Cupertino Property Development II, LLC
Location: 10380 Perimeter Road (APN 316-20-092)
SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR TREE REMOVAL PERMIT:
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tree
Removal Permit as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Committee has recommended adoption of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of
the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to
the application; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application:
a) That the trees are irreversibly diseased, are in danger of falling, can cause potential damage to
existing or proposed essential structures, or interferes with private on-site utility services and
cannot be controlled or remedied through reasonable relocation or modification of the structure or
utility services;
The majority (52 of 84) of the Coast Redwoods along the Wolfe Road and I-280 perimeter of the site are found
by the City's Consulting Arborist to be in extremely poor to irrecoverable health condition due to lack of water
or overcrowding. Nine Coast Redwood trees along the I-280 perimeter were identified by the arborist as having
a high suitability for preservation since they appear reasonably healthy and have no significant issues or
defects. Three of these trees are proposed for removal due to the proposed trail pathway connection, while the
other six will be preserved. All of the 28 perimeter trees along Wolfe Road are proposed for removal since
twenty-two of these are in poor health and since it will facilitate the construction of the pathway.
Resolution No.6755 TR-2014-28 August 26,2014
b) That the location of the trees restricts the economic enjoyment of the property by severely limiting
the use of property in a manner not typically experienced by owners of similarly zoned and situated
property, and the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the approval authority that there
are no reasonable alternatives to preserve the tree(s).
The City's consulting arborist has determined that the trees proposed for removal are in conflict wfth the
proposed new buildings and site improvements, and, given their condition, are not suitable for preservation or
relocation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of the initial study, maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on
PAGE 2 thereof,:
A Mitigated Negative Declaration (Application no. EA-2014-06) is hereby recommended for adoption;
and the application for a Tree Removal Permit, Application no. TR-2014-28 is hereby recommended for
approval and that the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution
are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. TR-2014-28 as set forth
in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of August 26, 2014, and are incorporated by reference as
though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
Planning Division:
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval recommendation is based on the plan set received August 13, 2014 consisting of 47 sheets
labeled A-0.0 to A-0.3, C-1.0 to C-5.0, C-5.1, C-6.0, L-1 to L-5, A-1.0 to A-1.4, A2.0 to A-2.6, A-3.0 to A-
3.8, A-4.0 to A-4.2, A-5.0, A-6.0, A-6.1, E-0.1, and E-1.0 to E-1.2, entitled, "Hyatt House, Cupertino
California, Wolfe Road & Interstate 280," drawn by Gene Fong Associates, Sandis, Bruce Jett
Associates, and Emerald City Engineers, Inc.; and the City's consulting arborist report entitled,
"Arborist Report: Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Wolfe Road and Interstate 280, Cupertino,
California (APN 316-20-092)," prepared by David Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist #399 dated
July 24, 2014 except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution.
2. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS
The conditions of approval contained in file nos. DP-2014-04, ASA-2014-06, U-2014-04, EXC-2014-07,
and TR-2014-40 shall be applicable to this approval.
3. TREE REPLACEMENTS AND FINAL PLANTING PLAN
MM-BIO 2: The applicant shall plant replacement trees in accordance with the replacement
requirements of the Protected Tree Ordinance. The trees shall be planted �rior to final occu�ancy of
site�ermits.
The final planting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community
Development with consultation by the City Arborist �rior to issuance of building �erxnits. The
Director of Community Development shall have the discretion to require additional tree
Resolution No.6755 TR-2014-28 August 26,2014
replacements as deemed necessary. The City Arborist shall confirm that the replacement trees were
planted properly and according to plan �rior to final occu�anc�.
4. IN-LIEU TREE REPLACEMENT FEES
The Director of Community Development has determined that accommodating the 56 remaining
required 24-inch box or 28 required 36-inch box trees on the property would not be feasible and
therefore a tree replacement in-lieu fee would be required. Prior to issuance of building�ermits, the
applicant shall pay the in-lieu fees in the amount to procure and install the replacement trees.
5. TREE REPLACEMENT BOND
The applicant shall provide a tree replacement bond in an amount determined by the City Arborist
prior to removals and issuance of demolition and r� adin��ermits. The bond shall be returned after
the required tree replacements have been planted and verified by the C ity Arborist.
6. STREET TREE REMOVAL (TREE 96)
Tree#96 is identified as a street tree on Wolfe Road. MM BIO-3: In order to remove any public street
trees within the Project site, the Project Applicant shall comply with Municipal Code Chapter 14.12,
Trees. The Project Applicant shall pay the required fee, prior to the issuance of a building permit,
per the New Street Tree Cost Schedule, for the purchase, planting, and maintenance of trees by the
City. All public trees shall be protected against damage during construction operations. There shall
be no storage of materials, tool washout, or vehicle parking near or upon public trees. This is in
accordance with Municipal Code Section 14.12.120, Condition for Development or Building Permit.
All planting costs associated with a building permit shall be collected by the Chief Building
Inspector, or his/her designee, for deposit into the City's general fund prior to the issuance of a
building permit. The fees for public tree removal and/or damage to branches and roots shall be as
specified in the Public Tree Damage or Removal Fee Schedule adopted by Council Resolution.
Damage and removal fees shall be deposited into the City's tree fund. This is in accordance with
Municipal Code Section 14.12.130, New Street Tree Costs and Public Tree Damage or Removal Fee
Schedules.
7. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS
The applicant is responsible to consult with other departxnents and/or agencies with regard to the
proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any
submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department.
8. INDEMNIFICATION
To the extent permitted by law, the Applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its City
Council, its officers, employees and agents (the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim,
action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to
attack, set aside, or void this ordinance or any permit or approval authorized hereby for the project,
including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorneys' fees and costs incurred in
defense of the litigation. T'he City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with
attorneys of its choice.
Resolution No.6755 TR-2014-28 August 26,2014
9. NOTICE OF FEES DEDICATIONS. RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section
66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees,
and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further
notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you
fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section
66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of August, 2014, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission
of the City of Cupertino, State of California,by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gong, Sun, Takahashi
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Chair Brophy, Vice Chair Lee
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:none
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:none
ATTEST: APPROVED:
/s/Gary Chao /s/Paul Bro�hy
Gary Chao Paul Brophy, Chair
Assist.Director of Community Development Planning Commission
G:\Planning\PDREPORT\RES\2014\TR-2014-28 res.doc
AR�OR RESOLIRCES
professional consulting arborists and tree care
ARBORIST REPORT
HYATT HOUSE HOTEL
AT VALLCO PARK
WOLFE ROAD & I NTERSTATE 280
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
(APN 316-20-092)
Submitted to:
_ r.. _ .__.ti__�_� - .._ _ .......,... �. _ :
Community Development De ''� mer�=�q���p�.�� E'�CC�vi�f-�7. '
City of Cupertino � ���`���� ��°�'�`��`� �
�#�t�t •
` � ������ �
10300 Torre Avenue � �
Cupertino, CA 95014 ������«�.��':-.:��.��:�>�., �.���W._!�
C'}���:.�3;�r�:;�°" ��.,.:�z���l,`r. .,__..
. .. �
Prepared by: �p�;:��r�;;� .�_..._...__ ----�._.......�..... ;�
d-3:o�6uicu�er ,
David L. Babby G's`'�^�°�'`�
Registered Consulting Arborist �#3`�`� '�` ' ` �"" `+ �
Board-Certified MasterArborist° #WE-4001B
August 25, 2014
p.o. box 25295, san mateo, california 94402 ■ email: arborresources@comcast.net
phone: 650.654.335 I • fax: 650.240.0777 ■ licensed contractor #796763
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25,2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 1
2.0 TREE COUNT AND COMPOSITION ............................................ 2
3.0 SUITABILITY FOR TREE PRESERVATION .......................................3
4.0 REVIEW OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS ...............................................5
4.1 Proposed Removals ......................................................................5
4.2 Potential Significant Impacts .......................................................5
5.0 GUIDELINES FOR TREE REPLACEMENTS ....................................8
6.0 GENERAL PROTECTION MEASURES ............................................ 10
6.1 Design Guidelines ........................................................................ 10
6.2 Before Demolition, Grading and Construction ............................12
6.3 During Demolition, Grading and Construction ............................13
7.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS .............................. 15
EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT TITLE
A TREE INVENTORY TABLE (20 sheets)
B SITE MAP (one sheet)
C PHOTOGRAPHS (11 sheets)
i
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25, 2014
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The City of Cupertino Community Development Department has retained me to prepare
this Arborist Report in connection with the proposed application to construct a five-story,
148-room hotel named Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park; the property is a triangular-
shaped lot, bordered by Interstate 280 to the north, N. Wolfe Road to the west, and
Perimeter Road to the south (APN 316-20-092), and currently serves as an overflow
parking lot for Vallco Mall.
Specific tasks assigned to perform are as follows:
■ Visit the site on May 12 and 15, 2014 to identify 150 trees having trunks with
diameters of four inches and greater at 54 inches above grade.
■ Determine each tree's trunk diameter at 54 inches above grade or where appropriate
to obtain the best representation of trunk size. Diameters are rounded to the nearest
inch, and trees listed with more than one diameter are formed by multiple trunks.
■ Ascertain each tree's health and structural integrity, and assign an overall condition
rating (e.g. good, fair,poor or dead).
■ Determine each tree's suitability for preservation(e.g. high, moderate or low).
■ Obtain photographs; see Exhibit C.
■ Identify which trees have trunks situated within the public right-of-way.
■ Assign tree numbers in a sequential pattern, and those locations can and numbers can
be viewed on Sheet A-0.2 presented in E�ibit B (copy of the Demolition/Tree
Removal Plan, dated 7/15/14).
■ Affix metal tags with engraved, corresponding numbers to each accessible trunk or
major limb (the tags are round aluminum).
■ Review the plan set dated 7/15/14 to identify potential tree disposition and impacts.
■ Provide tree replacement guidelines.
■ Develop general protection measures to help avoid or mitigate impacts to trees
planned for retention.
■ Prepare a written report that presents the aforementioned infoi-mation, and submit via
email as a PDF document.
Hyatt House Hotel at Valdco Park, Cupertirao Page 1 of I S
City of Cupertino Communiry Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 2S, 2014
2.0 TREE COUNT AND COMPOSITION
One-hundred fifty (150) trees of eight various species were inventoried for this report.
They are sequentially numbered as 1 thru 150, and the table below, and continued on the
following two pages, identifies their common names, assigned numbers, counts and overall
percentages.
% OF
NAME TREE NUMBER S COUNT TOTAL
coast live oak 91, 92, 145, 146 4 3%
coast redwood 1, 2, 4, 5-89, 93-95, 97-102, 107 98 65%
cork oak 90, 143, 144 3 2%
evergreen pear 109, 110, 136-139 6 4%
honey locust 103, 131-133, 142, 147-150 9 6%
Monterey pine 129, 130, 134, 135, 140, 141 6 4%
pin oak 127, 128 2 1%
Shamel ash 3, 96, 104-106, 108, 111-126 22 15%
Total 150 100%
As illustrated above, the site is populated predominantly by coast redwoods, which form a
highly dense and established screen along the north (Hwy 280) and west (N. Wolfe Road)
boundaries. They e�ibit symptoms of significant or severe stress from not receiving
sufficient water for a good number of years, and the vast majority appear in poor health.
Of these, many are beyond recovery, and others might improve if an assertive watering
program is immediately implemented. Absent of supplemental water, continued,
progressive decline can be expected, and those otherwise intended for retention and
protection may ultimately die and/or require removal.
Hyatt Hoiise Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page 2 of 1 S
City of Cupertino Community Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25, 2014
Specific information regarding each tree is presented within the table in Exhibit A. The
trees' locations and corresponding numbers can be viewed on the site map in Exhibit B,
and photographs are presented in Exhibit C.
One tree, #96, is a within the public right-of-way along N. Wolfe Road and defined as a
street tree.
Four coast live oaks are defined as "specimen trees"pursuant to Appendix B of Ordinance
No. 07-2003; they include#91, 92, 145 and 146.
3.0 SUITABILITY FOR TREE PRESERVATION
Each tree has been assigned either a "high," "moderate" or "low" suitability for
preservation rating as a means to cumulatively measure and consider their existing health,
structural integrity, anticipated life span, available growing space, location, size and
species. A description of these ratings are presented below; note that the "high" category
comprises nine (or 6%), the "moderate" category 58 (or 39%), and the "low" category 83
(or 55%) of the total inventoried trees.
Hi�h: Applies to trees#14,20, 29,32,33, 44, 89, 95 and 97.
These trees offer a good potential for contributing long-term to the site; appear reasonably
healthy with stable structures; have no apparent, significant health issues or structural
defects; and require regular care to maintain their longevity and vigor.
Moderate: Applies to trees #3, 5, 8, 10, 15, 16, 21-28, 30, 31, 35, 36, 39, 41, 42, 45-52,
54, 55, 57-59, 61, 63-65, 75, 82, 87, 91-93, 98-102, 107, 118, 119, 124, 125, 131, 132, 139
and 143.
These trees contribute to the site but at levels less than those assigned a high suitability;
have health andlor structural issues that can potentially be reasonably addressed and
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page 3 of 1 S
City of Cupertino Community Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist° August 25, 2014
property mitigated; and frequent care is typically required for their remaining lifespan. A
good number of redwoods within this rating serve as established screening elements
between Interstate 280 and N. Wolfe Road; they are assigned moderate suitability solely
for this reason, as well as the potential of health recovery, including numerous that have
been "topped" and/or suppressed growth due to adjacent, more established trees (they
would otherwise be assigned a low suitability for their poor health condition).
Low: Applies to trees #1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11-13, 17-19, 27, 34, 37, 38, 40, 43, 53, 56, 60, 62,
66-74, 76-81, 83-86, 88, 90, 94, 96, 103-106, 108-117, 120-123, 126-130, 133-138, 140-
142 and 144-150.
These trees are either dead, nearly dead, severely declined, highly suppressed in terms of
canopy and trunk development, and/or have such serious structural defects that they are
expected to worsen regardless of tree care measures employed (i.e. beyond recovery).
None appear suitable for retention.
Of low suitability trees, the following four should be immediately removed: #94, 123,
126 and 145. Trees #94, 123 and 126 are dead. Tree#145 has a massive split where four
leaders originate, and is at severe risk of breaking at any time (presents an immediate,
hazardous risk to persons and vehicles below).
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page 4 of 1 S
City of Cupertino Community Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25, 2014
4.0 REVIEW OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS
4.1 Proposed Removals
The following 114 trees are identified for removal to accommodate the proposed project
design and/or low suitability for preservation: #1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11-13, 17-19, 27, 34, 37, 38,
40,43, 53 and 56-150.
The above list considers the following:
■ All redwood trees along the western boundary for construction of the proposed path
(the vast majority are in poor condition).
■ All trees at the southwest section of the site to accommodate the proposed path,
driveway, and grading.
■ All trees within the existing parking lot for construction of the building and garage.
■ All trees within the planter strip along Perimeter Road for site improvements.
■ Select redwoods along the north boundary due to being in poor condition.
■ Trees at the northwest corner of the property for the bioretention planter.
Of the 114 trees, three are assigned a high suitability, 27 a moderate suitability, and 84 a
low suitability; none are suitable for relocation. The high suitability trees include #89, 95
and 97, all sizeable coast redwoods with trunk diameters of 30, 22 and 24 inches,
respectively, but appear in only fair health condition; their removal appears necessitated by
the proposed path, driveway, and associated grading at the southwest corner of the site.
4.2 Potential Significant Impacts
Of the 36 trees planned for retention, implementation of the proposed design would
subject a number to a high or severe level of impacts. Discussion and recommendations
for design modification to achieve adequate protection are provided in this section.
Redwood trees #14, 15, 16, 20 and 21 will sustain potentially severe root loss during
excavation for the new section of parking lot at the northeast section of the property. To
achieve protection, the section of existing planter within at least 12 feet from their
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page S of]S
City of Cupertino Community Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25, 2014
trunks should remain intact and be regarded as their Tree Protection Zone ("TPZ"
hereinafter). Please note that information provided on A-0.2 regarding "portion of exist.
planter shall remain intact to ensure..." does not achieve protection of the specific
redwoods without a redesign that area.
The proposed relocation of the cellular equipment enclosure will result in excavation
within a significant section of tree #10's root zone, and the process may expose root
damage or loss to #14-16, 20 and 21. I recommend a plan for relocating this feature is
provided to best assess impacts.
For trees retained along the northern border, excavation for the proposed storm drain and
inlets would expose retained redwoods to potential loss and/or damage of large roots
within the parking lot. To reduce the risk of damage or impacts, I recommend the main
line is established at least ten feet from the trunks. The inlets can be placed at the edge of
proposed lot, however, must be strategically located away from retained trees (i.e. in voids
containing trees that are either small or proposed for removal), and the lines connecting the
inlets to the storm in a radial direction to tree trunks. A possible alternative is for the line
to be directionally-bored by 36 inches or more below grade, and the access pits established
beyond the canopies of retained trees.
The proposed nine light poles along the north boundary show footings within the existing
planter and immediately adjacent to the following 12 trees: #16, 21, 26, 30, 31, 35, 36, 41,
44, 45, 49 and 54. To avoid potentially significant impacts, I recommend the light poles
are situated or designed so that no drilling or excavation is needed within the planter (a
possible alternative is to place them within the finger islands). The electrical layout should
also be configured as described above for the storm drains.
Another potential impact for trees along the north boundary involves the footing design
and installation method of the proposed wall/curb. It is critical that constructing the
future wall/curb and gutter does not require lateral excavation into the existing planter (i.e.
any soil and roots behind existing back of curb), including for overexcavation to form and
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page 6 of 1 S
City of Cupertino Community Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25, 2014
pour. Additionally, the wall/curb and gutter should not require excavation into existing
base material, or have the flexibility for as-built changes should roots of two inches and
greater in diameter be encountered. Additionally, existing base material should be
utilized for the new lot where roots of this size become encountered.
The electrical layout for lighting or other purposes is critical to avoid trenching within
protection zones, and subsequently, resulting in severe root loss. To avoid this from
occurring, I recommend the layout is established, reviewed, and approved prior to building
permit issuance, and the routes established beyond TPZs.
The path proposed along the north side of the northern shared fence line appears to
present no significant impacts to adjacent redwoods, provided excavation is not needed for
its construction (i.e. a no-dig design, including for base materials, forms and edging), and
direct compaction of existing soil grade can be avoided grade. A material that may achieve
these specifications is Tensar Biaxial Geogrid (www.tensarcorp.com).
Note that for any redwoods being considered for retention, it is critical to begin
immediately supplying them with supplemental water. Their current, overall poor and
dying condition can be attributed to an absence of water for numerous years.
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page 7 of I S
City of Cupertirao Community Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25, 2014
5.0 GUIDELINES FOR TREE REPLACEMENTS
Applying Section 14.18.185, Table A, of the City Code, one of the following options
would be applied for mitigating removal of the 114 trees:
■ Installing 187 trees of 24-inch box size.
■ Installing 109 trees of 24-inch box size plus 39 of 36-inch box size.
■ Installing 109 trees of 24-inch box size, and for the additional 78 trees of 24-inch
box size, any combination of one 36-inch box for every two 24-inch boxes.
Per L-3's table, a total of 121 trees are proposed for installation, 106 of which are 24-inch
box size and 15 are of 36-inch box size. Applying Code Section 14.18.185, there is a
difference of 51 trees of 24-inch box trees to meet mitigation replacements.
Regarding redwoods proposed for installation along the west boundary, the existing coast
redwoods are roughly spaced, on average, nine to ten feet apart. I suggest that 12 feet
between each tree is appropriate spacing for this site.
For redwoods to be installed along the north boundary, there are some instances where
redwoods are proposed for removal due to being under highly suppressed and crowded-
growing conditions, and installing a new redwood would be futile due to inadequate space,
sunlight, and the established dominance of adjacent redwoods with broad canopies;
examples include#9, 27, 34, 40, 43 and 56.
Also along the north boundary, there are other instances where trees are proposed for
removal due to being in poor condition, and there appears sufficient sunlight and spacing
to promote the growth of a new redwood; if not one replacement to each removed, then
one between where two are removed. Specific considerations are as follows:
■ Replacements for #1, 2, 4, 11, 12, 13, 53 and 60-63 should be installed within the
same trunk areas as of the removed trees.
■ One tree is suggested between#17 and 18, and another between#37 and 38.
■ The spacing between new and existing would vary along the north boundary to
accommodate the above recommendations and consider existing conditions, such
as the existing redwoods dominating available planting space and sunlight.
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page 8 of 1 S
City of Czipertino Community Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25, 2014
■ For new redwoods installed, I do not anticipate those planted in close proximity of
established ones will sustain sufficient growing space and sunlight to reach a
similar height. Those setback some from established ones do present a reasonably
good opportunity though, and estimate that under favorable growing conditions,
they may produce a similar height in 15 to 20 years.
Sheet L-3 does not show the northeast corner where trees #1, 2 and 4 are proposed for
removal, and new trees could be installed as replacements (e.g. new redwoods); I
recommend the plan is updated accordingly.
The proposed palette for new trees should be further reviewed by the Public Works
arborist and/or me to determine whether numerous of the proposed London planes should
be substituted with an alternative species.
Based on the amount of new trees to be installed, they should be selected and tagged at
the nursery by an ISA (International Society of Arboriculture) certified arborist and/or the
landscape architect prior to being shipped to the site. They should have relatively
symmetrical structures mostly free of obvious defects, wounds and girdling roots.
Additionally, the arborist and/or landscape architect should be retained to examine and root
prune, as needed, once the boxes are removed and before being installed.
All new trees should be installed, including necessary irrigation, by an experienced state-
licensed landscape contractor or a professional tree service company, and performed to
professional industry standards. Only if necessary to stand upright, they should be double-
staked(no cross-brace) with rubber tree ties or equivalent, and the support stakes cut below
the first main lateral branch. Percolation tests should also be performed for each planting
pit to ensure drainage is achieved.
All irrigation should be supplied through valves and automatic timers separate from that
of shrubs, plants and groundcover, and supplied by two bubblers placed and staked on the
surface of the root ball (versus against the trunk or in a sleeve) at around the one-half or
three-quarters of the distance between the trunk and rootball edges. Additionally, an eight-
inch tall circular berm formed by soil should be formed around the perimeter of the
rootball (for water from the bubblers to flood). A three-inch layer of wood-chip mulch
should be spread on top and 12 inches beyond the root ball (but not piled against trunks).
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page 9 of 1 S
City of Cupertino Comnaunity Development Departme�at
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist° August 25, 2014
6.0 GENERAL PROTECTION MEASURES
Recommendations presented within this section serve as general design guidelines to help
mitigate or avoid impacts to trees being retained. They are subject to revision upon
reviewing the updated project design, and I should be consulted in the event any cannot be
feasibly implemented. Please note that all referenced distances from trunks are intended
to be from the closest edge (face o� of their outermost perimeter at soil grade.
6.1 Design Guidelines
1. All recommendations presented in Section 4.0 of this report should be considered
part of this section.
2. A TPZ is where all trenching, soil scraping, compaction, grading (cut and fill),
removal of underground utilities and vaults, finish-grading, overexcavation,
subexcavation, swales, bioswales, storm drains, equipment cleaning, stockpiling and
dumping of materials, and equipmentivehicle operation shall be avoided. For general
design purposes, the minimum TPZs of select trees that may potentially be retained
are provided in Section 4.0 of this report. For all other inventoried trees not
mentioned in Section 4.0 but being retained, I recommend their TPZs are up to 12
inches from proposed improvements, and beneath their entire canopies in all other
directions. Where an impact encroaches slightly within a setback, it can be reviewed
on a case-by-case basis to determine appropriate mitigation measures.
3. The tree numbers of all retained trees should be added to the civil and landscape
plans to allow for efficient design review for both the City and contractors.
4. Sheet C-3.0 should show the limits of grading.
5. All existing, unused lines, pipes and manholes within a TPZ should be abandoned
and cut off at existing soil grade (rather than being dug up and causing subsequent
root damage); this provision should be specified on A-0.2.
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page 10 of I S
Ciry of Cz�pertino Community Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25, 2014
6. Overexcavation for constructing any curb, gutter, walk, foundation etc. within a
TPZ should be reduced to the maximum extent possible, such as six inches.
7. Shoring should be specified for the north side of the proposed underground garage.
8. The permanent and temporary drainage design, including downspouts, should not
require water being discharged within TPZs. Also, any swales needed for drainage
within a TPZ should require no more than a three-inch soil cut and fill, and roots two
inches and greater in diameter retained and not damaged.
9. Any underground utilities and services (e.g. electrical) should be routed beyond
TPZs. Where this is not feasible, the section of line(s) within the TPZ should be
directionally-bored by at least four feet below existing grade, or installed by other
means (e.g. pipe-bursting) to avoid an open trench. The ground above any tunnel
must remain undisturbed, and access pits and any above-ground infrastructure (e.g.
splice boxes, meters and vaults) established beyond all TPZs.
10. The future staging area and route(s) of access should be shown on the final site plan
and avoided on unpaved areas beneath or near canopies. Where not feasible, I should
be consulted to review the location and proximity to particular trees, and strive to
identify a temporary root zone buffer that could potentially minimize soil compaction
within a TPZ, and in turn, lessen impacts to a tree's vigor and longevity.
11. To restrict spoils and runoff from traveling into root zones, the future erosion
control design should establish any silt fence and/or straw rolls away from a tree's
trunk (not against it), and as close to the canopy edge as possible. Additionally,
where within a TPZ, the material should require none or a maximum vertical soil cut
of two inches for its embedment.
12. The landscape design should conform to the following additional guidelines:
a. Large growing trees, such as those that can exceed the height of retained trees,
should be installed beyond TPZs, and at least 10 to 15 feet from a future
foundation, wall and hardscape.
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page 11 of 15
City of Cupertino Community Development Departnzent
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25, 2014
b. Plant material installed beneath canopies of oaks must be drought-tolerant,
limited in amount, and planted at least five or more feet from their trunks. Plant
material installed beneath the canopies of all other trees should be at least 36
inches from their trunks.
c. Irrigation and lighting features (e.g. main line, lateral lines, valve boxes,
wiring and controllers) should be established so that no trenching occurs within
a TPZ. In the event this is not feasible, they may require being installed in a
radial direction to a tree's trunk, and terminate a specific distance from a trunk
(versus crossing past it).
d. Ground cover beneath canopies should be comprised of a three- to four-inch
layer of coarse wood chips or other high-quality mulch (gorilla hair, bark or
rock, stone, gravel, black plastic or other synthetic ground cover should be
avoided). Mulch should not be placed against the trees' trunks.
e. Tilling, ripping and compaction within TPZs should be avoided.
f. Bender board or other edging material proposed beneath the canopies should
be established on top of existing soil grade(such as by using vertical stakes).
g. Providing ongoing supplemental water during the dry months of the year
following the project would benefit the longevity of redwoods and, possibly
applied through bubblers strategically located throughout the root zones.
Additional discussion can be provided upon request.
h. Ensure no recycled water is supplied to the redwoods.
6.2 Before Demolition, Grading and Construction
13. A site meeting with the general contractor and me ("project arborist" hereinafter)
should be conducted several weeks prior to work commencing for the purpose of
reviewing tree fencing locations and other measures presented in this report.
Additional site visits include reviewing root pruning and tree impacts during
construction, and providing a final assessment of project impacts (for scheduling
purposes, I request a minimum five business-day notice for these subsequent visits).
14. Tree protective fencing is needed prior to any grading, trenching or excavation for
the purpose of restricting access into and enclosing the entire TPZs. Its location can
be identified during the initial site meeting, and should remain intact and be
Hyatt Hoa�se Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page 12 of 1 S
City of Cupertino Community Developme�it Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25, 2014
maintained throughout construction. One approach is to utilize five-foot tall chain
link panels mounted on steel posts or concrete blocks, and the panels firmly
established to avoid easily being shifted or opened. Another includes mounting five-
to six-foot tall chain link on two-inch diameter steel posts that are driven into the
ground 24 inches deep.
15. The limits of sidewalk, streetscape and grading should be staked prior to any
digging occurring.
16. Wood chips may need to be spread on exposed ground beneath the canopies of select
trees. They should be coarse (e.g. %- to 3/-inch in size), and spread to a four- to five-
inch layer beyond improvements, not piled against a trunk, and remain throughout
construction.
6.3 During Demolition, Grading and Construction
17. Great care must be taken during demolition of all existing features, to including the
existing structures, curbs, gutter, etc. to avoid excavating into the ground and
disturbing roots.
18. Any approved digging or trenching within a TPZ should be manually performed
without heavy equipment or tractors, including small ones, operating within a TPZ.
19. Any roots encountered during the process with diameters less than two inches in
diameter can be cleanly severed at a 90-degree angle to the direction of root growth.
In doing so, sharp cutting tools (e.g. loppers or handsaw) shall be used, and the cut
should occur against the tree side of the trench. Roots considered for removal with
diameters of two inches and greater must first be reviewed by the project arborist.
20. Spoils created during digging must not be piled or spread within a TPZ. If necessary,
they can be temporarily piled on plywood or a tarp.
21. Tree trunks shall not be used as winch supports for moving or lifting heavy loads.
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page 13 of I S
Ciry of Cupertirio Community Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25, 2014
22. Supplemental water is essential to promote, and in many instances improve, the
vigor and longevity of trees being retained, as well as help offset impacts. The
methodology, amount and frequency can be discussed prior to construction.
23. The disposal of harmful products (such as cement,paint, chemicals, oil and gasoline)
is prohibited beneath canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath or
near TPZs. Herbicides should not be used with a TPZ; where used on site, they
should be labeled for safe use near trees.
24. Any tree pruning should be performed by a California state-licensed tree service
company (D-49 classification) that has an ISA certified arborist in a supervisory role,
carries General Liability and Worker's Compensation insurance, and abides by in
accordance with ANSI A300-2001 (Pruning) and ANSI Z133.1-2006 (Safety
Operations) standards.
Hyatt Hoa�se Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page 14 of I S
City of Cupertino Corrtmunity Development Departmerlt
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25,2014
7.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
■ All information presented herein reflects my observations and measurements obtained from the
project site on May 12 and 15,2014.
■ My observations were performed visually without probing, coring, dissecting or excavating. I
cannot, in any way, assume responsibility for any defects that could only have been discovered
by performing the mentioned services in the specific area(s)where a defect was located.
■ The assignment pertains solely to trees listed in Exhibit A. I hold no opinion towards other
trees on or surrounding the project area.
■ I cannot provide a guarantee or warranty, expressed or implied,that deficiencies or problems of
any trees or property in question may not arise in the future.
■ No assurance can be offered that if all my recommendations and precautionary measures
(verbal or in writing) are accepted and followed,that the desired results may be achieved.
■ I cannot guarantee or be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others.
■ I assume no responsibility for the means and methods used by any person or company
implementing the recommendations provided in this report.
■ The information provided herein represents my opinion. Accordingly, my fee is in no way
contingent upon the reporting of a specified finding, conclusion or value.
■ The numbers shown on the site map in Exhibit B are intended to only roughly approximate a
tree's location and should not be considered as surveyed trunk locations.
■ This report is proprietary to me and may not be copied or reproduced in whole or part without
prior written consent. It has been prepared for the sole and exclusive use of the parties to who
submitted for the purpose of contracting services provided by David L. Babby.
■ If any part of this report or copy thereof be lost or altered,the entire evaluation shall be invalid.
Prepared By: � ' Date: Au�ust 25, 2014
David L. Babby
Registered Consulting Arborist°#399 - -�.
Board-Certified MasterArborist°#WE-4001B 'f�� �� `
�,,�� '
,
� .
,,. _
,� _
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page 1 S of 15
City of Cupertino Community Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25, 2014
EXHIBIT A:
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
(20 sheets)
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino
City of Cupertino Community Development Department
- ARBOR RESOLIRCES
professional consulting arborists and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
�
N ln � lO
� L. ra > 3 >
O O � N p O
� � � � � Vf J C
� �� •L �� C L N � C
L � � � p O � d }+ v
� � Q � Q � � (6 �
L
� � }� � y � \ � � Q
� � � N = L �� � ��
� � m (B m IOj � y�j 0 �
TREE/ o `� — �
U II � II = � N
TAG Y � o � o ;� o � � Q
� `° °o � °o °1 � �' °—° o
NO. TREE NAME � _ � �; � p � N = a
coast redwood
1 (Seqaroia sempervirens) 13 30% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Near bottom of hill. Dead branches. Water may improve health.
coast redwood
2 (Seqa�oia sernpervirens) 17 30% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Topped,a condition that adversely impacts long-term structural integrity. At bottom of hill.
Shamel ash
3 (Fraxini�s uhdei) 27 60% 40% Fair Moderate
Comments: Multiple leader structure. Lower trunk is covered by ivy. At top of hill.
coast redwood
4 (Seguoia senzpervirens) 20 30% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Near top of hill. Topped. Very stressed canopy and recovery is highly questionable.
coast redwood
5 (Sequoia senzpervirens) 16 40°/o 50% Poor Moderate
Comments: Roots have contributed to large mounds in adjacent asphalt lot. Trunk has outgrown small
planter. Adjacent curb is cracked.
coast redwood
6 (Seyiroia sernpervirens) 20 20% 30% Poor Low X
Comments: Nearly dead and beyond recovery.
coast redwood
7 (Se9troia sempervirens) 23 20% 30% Poor Low X
Comments: Nearly dead and beyond recovery. Adjacent curb is raised,and roots have formed mounds
in parking lot.
coast redwood
8 (Sequoia sempervirens) 20 50% 40% Poor Moderate
Comments: Topped. Sparse canopy,and improvement only possible with regular watering.
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 1 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
ARBOR RESOLIRCES
professional consult�n9 3�bOrt5t5 and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
+^� ;� +�
L i � � (O
l6 �
0 o v 3 >
� > >, � p � O O
> a..�
� II 'L II � L � � �
L � o � o p p � a1
d +-� �
� � � � � � � i � i
� '6 +.; C .N � � 0 N O
� C N N O i � '6 4-
TREE `6 � m � m � �° }' o �
� � ii � n — � — � �
TAG Y � o � o @ o @ s Q
NO. TREE NAME � _ ° �; � O � N = a
coast redwoocl
9 (Seqzroia sempervirens) 14 30% 60% Poor Low X
Comments: Declining canopy with highly questionable recovery.
coast redwood
10 (Sequoia sempervirens) 25 40% 70% Poor Moderate
Comments: Topped and very sparse canopy. Recovery possible,but only with regular watering.
coast redwood
11 (Sequoia sempervirens) 22 30% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Adjacent to tall sign. Topped. Very sparse canopy with highly questionable recovery.
coast redwood
12 (Seqtioia senapervirens) 19 30% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Adjacent to tall sign. Topped. Very sparse canopy with highly questionable recovery.
coast redwood
13 (Sequoia senlpervireris) 21 30% 50% Poar Low X
Comments: Lower trunk sweeps(i.e.curves)then grows vertical. Very sparse canopy with highly
questionable recovery.
coast redwood
14 (Segitoia sempervirens) 24 80% 70% Good High
Comments: Relatively healthy tree with good structure.
coast redwood
15 (Sequoia sempervireris) 24 40% 40% Poor Moderate
Comments: Topped. A large buttress roots grows around an existing beam. Declining health,and
recovery may be possible with regular watering.
coast redwood
16 (Segi�oin sernpervirens) 24 40% 40% Poor Moderate
Comments: Topped. Declining health,and recovery may be possible with regular watering.
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 2 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
- ARBOR RESvURCES
profeasional consultin9 arborists and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
.�
� � � � 3 >
0 o v
" � �, � o a, o 0
� � n � ii c � � � �
� o o tw o � o a .°�' �
v +, o a�, ° �.. ° L � �
� � }; c �; �° � o a� o
C VI N � L � � �'�'
TREE `� u° m � m � � � ° �
/ � I I � II = \ — � N
TAG „ �}—' � � ° � o � � Q
c � o � o v o ,� � o
NO. TREE NAME � _ � �, � p � N = a
coast redwood
17 (Sequoia sernpervirens) 13 40% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Suppressed and crowded-growing conditions.
coast redwood
18 (Seqi�oia sempervirens) 8 40% 30% Poor Low X
Comments: Suppressed growth adjacent to#19.
coast redwood
19 (Sequoia sernpervirens) 13 40% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Suppressed growth adjacent to#18.
coast redwood
Zp (Sequoiasempervirens) 28 70% 80% Good High
Comments: Relatively healthy tree with a stable structure.
coast redwood
21 (Sequoia senxpervire�zs) 21 60% 60% Fair Moderate
Comments: Nearly the entire trunk sweeps(i.e.grows with curves).
coast redwood
22 (Seqitoia sempervirens) 25 70% 50% Fair Moderate
Comments: Relatively healthy tree with decent structure.
coast redwood
23 (Sequoia sempervirens) 15 80% 40% Fair Moderate
Comments: Crowded-growing conditions. Appears healthy.
coast redwood
24 (Segiroia sentpervirens) 23 40% 70% Poor Moderate
Comments: Declined canopy,and recovery only possible through regular watering.
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 3 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
ARBOR RESOLIRCES
professional consultin9 arborists and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
.�
i i � � (O
>O >O v v p O
> � > �
� c � a� � �
L �
v o \ w \ � o a }; �
.°�' '+� o a; ° +' a � � �
a� � +; � }; � L o v �
� c N � -a
TREE `� c.°� m � m � LL � ° v
� 0 u � ii — � — � �
TAG Y � o � o ;� o � � Q
NO. TREE NAME � _ ° ,; ° p t� �, = a
coast redwood
25 (Sequoia sempervirens) 22 40% 70% Poor Moderate
Comments: Declined canopy,and recovery only possible through regular watering.
coast redwood
26 (Sequoia sentpervirens) 32 40% 70% Poor Moderate
Comments: Declined canopy-needs regular water for recovery. Excessive branch weight.
coast redwood
27 (Sequoia sempervirens) 14 40% 50% Poor Moderate X
Comments: Gowded-gowing conditions adjacent to#26. Declined canopy-needs water for recovery.
coast redwood
28 (Seqtioia sentpervirens) 20 50% 50% Fair Moderate
Comments: Crowded-growing conditions adjacent to#29. Needs re�gular water far health improvement.
coast redwood
29 (Seqtroia sentpervirens) 24 60% 80% Fair High
Comments: Fairly healthy tree with a stable structure.
coast redwood
30 (Seqiroia sernpervirens) 20 50% 50% Fair Moderate
Comments: Needs regular watering for health improvement.
coast redwood
31 (Sequoia sempervirens) 20 40% 70% Fair Moderate
Comments: Declined canopy-needs regular watering for health improvement.
coast redwood
32 (Seyuoia sentpervirens) 18 60% 70% Fair High
Comments: Fairly healthy tree with a stable structure.
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 4 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
- ARBOR RESOLIRCES
professional cons�ltm9 arboriats and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
.�
L i � � fO
l6
O O v
� > � > � N O O
� � � C � v � �
L O \ ti0 \ � � d � �
��., +� � N � •}, � L � �
� � +-% C �; � � � v O
C �n �n � _i � -� w
ta O v � � ta �, O 'O
TREE/ o u m � m � \ _ � v
�
TAG Y � o � o � o � t Q
NO. TREE NAME � _ ° �, � O � N = a
coast redwood
33 (Seqi�oia sempervirens) 24 80% 70% Good High
Comments: Relatively healthy tree with a stable structure.
coast redwood
34 (Sequoia sempervire�is) 16 50% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Suppressed,crowded-growing conditions.
coast redwood
35 (Sequoia se�npervirens) 17 50% 50% Fair Moderate
Comments: Crowded-growing conditions. Regular watering is needed to improve health.
coast redwood
36 (Seq:�oia sempervirens) 32 50% 70% Fair Moderate
Comments: Sparse canopy. Excessive branch weight. Regular watering is needed to improve health.
coast redwood
37 (Sequoia sempervireris) 13 50% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Suppressed,crowded-growing conditions.
coast redwood
38 (Seguoia sempervirens) 12 60% 30% Poor Low X
Comments: Suppressed,crowded-�,nowing conditions.
coast redwood
39 (Segieoia sempervirens) 22 50% 30% Poor Moderate
Comments: Topped. Excessive branch weight needs addressing through pruning. Regular watering
needed to improve health.
coast redwood
40 (Seqi�oia sernpervirer�s) 12 50% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Topped. Crowded-growing conditions between adjacent,dominant trees.
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Va//co Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 5 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
ARBOR RESOLiRCES
p�ofessionai cons��tinc� arborists and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
.�
� � � �
� � � � 3 >
0 o v
" � �, � o v o 0
� � ii � ii � � v � �
� o o °0 0 ° o a a; �
�,; +, O a� p +� ° L co
� =a ,� c }; � � o a� o
c �n �n � L. `�' -o '+-
TREE `� � m � m � � � ° �
� O � io � �o � � � � o
TAG „ *—' � � � L o � � a
� `° °o � °o °' � �' °-° o
NO. TREE NAME � = r+ �, �-+ p � �, = a
coast redwood
41 (Sequoia sempervirens) 32 60°/o 30% Poor Moderate
Comments: Topped. Regular watering needs for improving health.
coast redwood
42 (Sequoia sernpervirens) 24 40% 70% Fair Moderate
Comments: Declined canopy-needs regular watering for health improvement.
coast redwood
43 (Sequoia sempervirens) 10 50% 30% Poor Low X
Comments: Suppressed,crowded-growing conditions.
coast redwood
44 (Sequoia ser�spervirens) 26 60% 80% Fair High
Comments: Relatively healthy tree with a stable structure.
coast redwood
45 (Seguoia sempervire�zs) 22 50% 50% Fair Moderate
Comments: Crowded-growing conditions has resulted in a narrow canopy.
coast redwood
46 (Sequoia sempervireris) 24 70% 40% Fair Moderate
Comments: Topped.
coast redwood
47 (Sequoia sempervireras) 24 40% 50% Poor Moderate
Comments:
coast redwood
48 (Sequoia sen�pervirens) 26 60% 50% Fair Moderate
Comments:
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 6 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
ARBOR RESOLIRCES
profess�onal consulting arbor�sts and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
.�
i i � � l6
� L
Q � � � � �
� � � � o
VI J C
� �� .L �� � L � � C
L Q O � O O Q � � �
i� � 0 � � � a L � L
�C � � � � � \ � � 0
C � N N L � �
TREE `6 � m � m v° � � o v
� � �� 7 n — � — � in
TAG � � o " � � °o *� � o
NO. TREE NAME � _ ° �, ° p � N = a
coast redwood
49 (Sequoia sempervirens) 32 60% 40% Fair Moderate
Comments: Topped.
coast redwood
50 (Sequoia sernpervirens) 20 50% 60% Fair Moderate
Comments: Needs regular watering for health improvement.
coast redwood
51 (Sequoia sempervirens) 20 40% 40% Poor Moderate
Comments: Declined health and poor structure.
coast redwood
52 (Sega�oia sempervirens) 24 40% 50% Poor Moderate
Comments: Declined health-needs regular watering for health improvement. Has a crook about
midway up trunk.
coast redwood
53 (Sequoia sempervirens) 20 30% 60% Poor Low X
Comments: Very sparse canopy with a highly questionable recovery.
coast redwood
54 (Seyuoia sempervirens) 26 40% 50% Poor Moderate
Comments: Trunk bifurcates into codominant leaders about midway up trunk. Needs regular water if
health improvement is expected.
coast redwood
55 (Sequoia sempervirens) 24 50% 60% Fair Moderate
Comments: Top curves. Regular�vatering is needed to improve health.
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 7 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
ARBOR RESOLIRCES
profess�onai consulting arborists and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
.�
i L � � (6
0 0 � v o 0
� � � � o � J
� n i ii c � v � �
.L O o � o O O � �
d �
°+3 '±� o +°; o a-' a° L `L° L
a, � }; � }; � � o � �
� c � � �
TREE fD c°� m � m � LL � o v
� � u � n = � — � �
TAG c ±� o " o � o `�° �a_.o 0
NO. TREE NAME � _ ° �, ° O � �, = a
coast redwood
56 (Sequoia se�npervirens) 15 50% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Suppressed,crowded-�nowing conditions.
coast redwood
57 (Seyttoia sefnpervirens) 23 60% 70% Fair Moderate X
Comments:
coast redwood
58 (Sequoia senipervirens) 30 60% 50% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Crowded-growing conditions. Excessive branch weight.
coast redwood
59 (Segt�oia sempervirens) 22 50% 60% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Regular watering is needed to iinprove health.
coast redwood
60 (Sequoia sempen�irens) 18 30% 60% Poor Low X
Comments: Very sparse canopy,and recovery is highly questionable.
coast redwood
61 (Sequoia sempervirens) 30 60% 40% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Topped. Needs regular watering for health improvement.
coast redwood
62 (Seqrroia sempervirens) 12 40% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Crowded-growing conditions contributes to poor trunk development.
coast red�vood
63 (Sequoia se�npervirens) 22 60% 40% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Needs regular watering for health improvement.
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 8 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
- ARBOR RESOLIRCES
p�ofess�onai consult�n9 arbor�5ts and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
+,
L L � � (6
� � � � � �
� T � �
� � II L II � L � � �
L O o dp o O p d +�-+ �
� +' O �,, O ±' a L � L
� � � � � � L O � O
TREE `° � m � m � LL � ° v
� � u � �� - � — � v,
TAG Y � o � o � � � � �
o n.
� f6 °o L o° °' o � °—° o
NO. TREE NAME � = r+ �, •-+ p � �„ = a
coast redwood
64 (Sequoin sentpervirens) 14 50% 50% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Topped. Crowded-growing conditions. Regular watering is needed for health improvement.
coast redwood
65 (Segicoia sempervirens) 30 40% 60% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Codominant tops. Declined canopy-needs regular watering for improvement.
coast redwood
66 (Sequoia sempervirens) 24 20% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Extremely poor health and beyond recovery.
coast redwood
(7 (Sequoia sempervirens) 8 40% 20% Poor Low X
Comments: Declined and highly suppressed canopy.
coast redwood
68 (Sequoia sempervirens) 26 20% 50% Poar Low X
Comments: Extremely poor health and beyond recovery.
coast redwood
(9 (Segi�oia sempervirens) 10 30% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Suppressed,crowded-growing conditions. Very sparse canopy.
coast redwood
70 (Seqi�oia sempervirens) 13 30% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Very sparse canopy. Recovery highly questionable.
coast redwood
71 (Sequoia sempervirens) 18 30% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Crowded-growing conditions. Very sparse canopy and recovery is highly questionable.
Project:Nyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 9 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
- ARBOR RESOLIRCES
p�ofessionai consult�n9 arborists and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
.�
0 o v � `�
�
a� o 0
C � �' �j � cn J
= II L 11 C � � \ �
i O o � o O p � y �
Y y Q QJ Q �"� O L f6
� -6 � � � � L `Q � �
� C N (� 'CS
TREE f6 u° m `L° m v �° � o �a
� o n � ii — � — � �
TAG Y � o v o � � � � �
NO. TREE NAME � °1 ° + ° � � � _ �
I— = cn O v� a
coast redwood
72 (Sequoia sempervirens) 26 30% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Topped. Very sparse canopy and recovery is highly questionable.
coast redwood
73 (Sequoia sempervirens) 26 30% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Very sparse canopy and recovery highly questionable.
coast redwood
74 (Sequoia sempervirens) 10 20% 30% Poor Low X
Comments: Has a dead top. Gowded-growing conditions. Extremely sparse and beyond recovery.
coast redwood
75 (Seqa�oia sempervireris) 36 40% 80% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Adjacent curb is buckled and raised. Declined canopy-needs regular watering if to recover.
coast redwood
76 (Seguoia senipervirens) 13 30% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Suppressed growth and a very sparse canopy. Recovery high questionable.
coast redwood
77 (Sequoia sempervirens) 24 30% 60% Poor Low X
Comments: Very sparse canopy and recovery highly questionable.
coast redwood
7$ (Seqaroia sempervirens) 22 20% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Extremely sparse canopy and beyond recovery.
coast redwood
79 (Seguoia sempervirens) 12 20% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Extremely sparse canopy and beyond recovery. Gooked top. Crowded-growing conditions.
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 10 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
ARBOR RESOLIRCES
professional consultin9 arborists and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
�
i L (O � � �
O O v N O O
C � y �j � VI J
� II 'i II � � � � �
L O \ OA o � � d +�-� 2�'
a� +� O � O }' � i, � L
� "6 �; C � � L � 4J O
� C N N �
TREE f6 u° m � m u ,� � ° �
/ � II � II = \ — � N
TAG Y Y o � o � o � � Q
c � o � o � o �, °p o
NO. TREE NAME � _ ° �, ° p � N = a
coast redwood
80 (Sequoia senipervirens) 24 20% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Extremely sparse canopy and beyond recovery.
coast redwood
81 (Sequoia sernpervirens) 4 30% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Crowded-growing conditions. Very sparse canopy and recovery highly questionable.
coast redwood
g2 (Sequoia sempervirens) 12 40% 70% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Declined canopy and requires regular watering if recovery is expected.
coast redwood
83 (Sequoia sernpervireris) 30 30% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Very sparse canopy and recovery is highly questionable. Topped.
coast redwood
84 (Seqi�oia sempervirens) 22 30% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Very sparse canopy and recovery is highly questionable.
coast redwood
8$ (Sequoia ser��pervirens) 17 30% 60°/a Poor Low X
Comments: Adjacent curb is buckled. Very sparse canopy and recovery is highly questionable.
coast redwood
86 (Se�uoia sempervirer�s) 26 30% 60% Poor Low X
Comments: Adjacent curb is buckled. Very sparse canopy and recovery is highly questionable.
coast redwood
87 (Seqi�oia senipervirens) 20 50% 60% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Trunk curves. Regular watering is needed if improve�nent to health is expected.
Projecf:Hyatt House Hote/at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 11 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby Augusi 25,2014
ARBOR RESOLIRCES
profess�onal consultin9 arborists and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
+�
L L � @ (6
0 o v L 3 >
� � �, � p N O O
� II L II � i � � �
L 0 a � o O p � N N
d � �
a.�., +� O � O +' � i, � i
� "a .N C }i � L � v O
� C v� �n 'a
TREE � v m � m v �° � o v
� o � io � io = � � � �
TAG Y }' � � � @ o � � a
� f6 °o � °o °' o �' °° o
NO. TREE NAME � _ �-+ �; � p � �, _ �
coast redwood
88 (Segi�oia sempervirens) 14 40% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Crowded-growing conditions.
coast redwood
89 (Sequoia sempervirens) 30 60% 70% Fair High X
Comments: Needs regular watering to improve health.
cork oak
9p (Qirercris s:iber) 13 30% 30% Poor Low X
Comments: Structure formed by three codominant leaders. Canopy is one-sided and extremely sparse.
Recovery is unlikely.
coast live oak
91 (Qziercus agrifolia) 15 80% 40% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Asymmetrical,nearly one-sided canopy(making poor structural form). Reasonably healthy.
coast live oak
92 (Quercus agrifolia) 14 90% 40% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Formed by codominant leaders at 10'high. Asymmetrical,one-sided canopy. Encroaches
on large light pole. Lower trunk has a large wound. Healthy canopy.
coast redwood
93 (Sequoia sempervire�as) 11 40% 40% Poor Moderate X
Comments: Suppressed growth due to crowded-growing conditions.
coast redwood
94 (Seqi�oia senrpervireiis) 13 0% 0% Dead Low X
Comments: Tree is dead and should be removed immediately.
coast redwood
95 (Seqz�oia senzpen�ireris) 22 50% 80% Fair High X
Comments: Needs water if expected to improve in]lealth.
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 12 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby Augusi 25,2014
ARBOR RESOLIRCES
professional consult�ng arbor�sts and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
.�
L L � � (6
� Q � � � �
c � � � � �n �
�' c � a� � �
� �� L (� L L
� 0 O � O O 0 d Y �
.1-� '�-'i Q � Q y � L � �
� � i-+ � � � \ � � Q
� � N N � L � �
f0 � m (O m U � � � �6
TREE/ o v n � n — � = � °�'
TAG � � o � o � -o � � o
o � a
NO. TREE NAME � _ ° �, ° O � N = a
Shamcl ash
96 (Fraxira�s zdidei) 24 50% 30% Poor Low X
Comments: Weak structure. On road side of fence,near sidewalk. Street tree.
coast redwood
97 (Seqa�oia sempervirens) 24 50% 70% Fair High X
Comments: Needs regular watering to improve health.
coast redwood
98 (Segt�oia sempervireres) 1 1 60% 60% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Gowded-growing conditions. Needs regular watering to improve health.
coast redwood
99 (Seqttoia sempervireiis) 8 60% 50% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Crowded-growing conditions. Needs regular watering to improve health.
coast redwood
100 (Sequoia sempervirens) 21 40% 70% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Sparse canopy-needs water if expected to improve in health.
coast redwood
101 (Sequoia sen�pen�irens) 14 50% 80% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Needs water if expected to improve in health.
coast redwood
102 (Segz�oia sempervirens) 20 40% 70% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Sparse canopy-needs water if expected to improve in health.
honey locust
103 (Gleditsia triacarithos) 13 30% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Structure comprised of codominant leaders.
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park,Cuperlino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 13 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
- ARBOR RESOLIRCES
professionai consultin9 arbor�sts and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
� � � a —
L L � L � 1
� � �
� > � > Q N � �
� � C
� �� •L �� � L � \ G
L O O � O O Q � y �
i-� � � � � � a L � L
� � � � }� � \ � � �
� U m � m U LL � O �
TREE/ o ii � ii = � = �
TAG � � o � o � o � � Q
� `° °o � °o °' o '`-' °° o
NO. TR E E N A M E � _ �-+ N �-+ p �7 N = a
Shanlel ash
104 (Fraxin:�s crhdei) 17 30% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Extremely sparse canopy and buried root collar. Recovery unlikely.
Shamel ash
105 (Fraxinus:rhdei) ll 60% 40% Fair Low X
Comments: Poor form.
Shamel ash
106 (Fraxinus uhdei) 13 40% 40% Poar Low X
Comments: Has substantial deadwood in lower canopy.
coast redwood
107 (Seqt�oia sentpervireyis) 22 40% 70% Fair � Moderate X
Comments: Sparse canopy-needs water if expected to improve in liealth.
Shamel ash
108 (Fraxi�rus t�hdei) 23 40% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Has a large girdling root. Canopy is sparse and formed by multiple leaders.
evergreen pear
109 (Pynrs kawakaf�iii) 9 40% 50% Poor Low X
Comments:
evergreen pear
110 (Pyrzis kawakarnri) 8 70% 40% Fair Low X
Comments: Large limbs cut from lower trunk. Poor structure.
Shamel ash
111 (Fraxinus uhdei) 18 40% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Formed by multiple leaders at 12 feet high. Has a large girdling root.
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cuperiino 14 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
ARBOR RESOI�RCES
p�ofessionai consviting arbor�sts and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
+�
L L (Q � (�
O O � � 3 >
� � � � 0
N O O
C � � \ �
L O \ dD \ � O ` � �
a a-.+
,.�, �+� O � O +_' O ra �
L
� -� � � � � L � � �
TREE/ o c°� m � m � LL � � v
II � II = \ N
TAG -" �.�—' o � o � o � t n.
c � o � o v o ,_, � o
NO. TREE NAME � _ ° �, ° p � N = a
Shamel ash
112 (Fraxinus uhdei) 19 40% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Codominants originate at eight feet high.
Shamel ash
113 (Fraxinus uhclei) 10 40% 30% Poor Low X
Comments: Very weak structure. Large limb previously cut. Canopy is highly asymmetrical and has
poor form.
Shamel ash
114 (Fraxini�s uhdei) 14 50% 30% Poor Low X
Comments: Severely pruned in past.
Shamel ash
115 (Fraxinus i�hdei) 6 30% 30% Poor Low X
Comments: Suppressed and very sparse canopy. Extensive deadwood. Buried root collar.
Shamel ash
116 (FrnxinT�s uhdei) 13 30% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Very sparse canopy.
Shamel ash
117 (Fraai�iacs uhdei) 5 20% 20% Poor Low X
Comments: Mostly dead and well-beyond recovery.
Shamcl ash
118 (Fraxirttrs ultder) 11 50% 50% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Declined canopy.
Shamel ash
119 (Frczxin:�s i�hdei) 10 40% 60% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Declined canopy.
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cuperiino 15 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
ARBOR RESOLIRCES
profess�onal consvlt�n9 arbor�sts and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
.�
L i � � [0
� �
O O � � >
� � y � o
v o 0
� � a� � �
� L
�� � � � � O � Q� {•�•� �
� �,,, � � Q �"i � � (�
d--� Q_ L L
� � }� � � � \ 0 � �
(SS � � � � � �" � �6
TREE/ o � m � ,C°, � � � � v
�
TAG � � o � o � o � � Q
NO. TREE NAME � _ ° �, ° p � �, _ �
Shamel ash
120 (Frazinus uhdei) 8 40% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Declined canopy and poor form.
Shamel ash
121 (Frazinus uhdei) 7 50°/a 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Declined canopy and poor form.
Shamel ash
122 (Fraxinus uhdei) 13 20% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Extensive dieback and well-beyond recovery.
Shamel ash
123 (Fraxinus uhdei) 9 0% 0% Dead Low X
Comments: Tree is dead and should be immediately removed.
Shamel ash
124 (FrcUrir:us uhdei) 19 80% 60% Good Moderate X
Comments: Curb along downhill side is raised,and roots have formed mounds in adjacent asphalt walk.
Shamel ash
125 (Fraxinus uhdei) 16 50% 60% Fair Moderate X
Comments Curb downhill is broken. Declined canopy.
Shamel ash
126 (Fraxinus c�lydei) 7 0% 0% Dead Low X
Comments: Tree is dead and should be immediately removed.
pin oak
127 (Querci�s pali�st��is) 10 50% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Has a large wound along inajor limb,as well as a sinall girdling root. Canopy is sparse
and broad.
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 16 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
ARBOR RESOLIRCES
profess�onal consulting arbor�sts and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
+� +� +�
LN. L � � (O
� � � � 0 �
c � � � �
c � a�i � �
� o � tin � o o L a v
a +, �
� +-� O � O a'' p L � L
� '6 +J C �: � � � a1 O
� C in in � .i � -6 �
N — UJ
TREE/ o c°� m � m � \ � � v
TAG Y � a � o � o � � Q
NO. TREE NAME � _ ° �, ° O �? N = �
pin oak
128 (Quercus palustris) 11 40% 20% Poor Low X
Comments Large deadwood and very sparse canopy. Form is very poor. There is a large decaying
wound along most of trunk,as well as extensive decay at trunk's base.
Monterey pine
129 (Piniss radiata) 15 40% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Has red turpentine beetle. Trunk has outgrown planter,and the adjacent curb has buckled
at multiple locations. Formed by codominant tops. Sparse canopy and beyond recovery.
Monterey pine
130 (Pinus radiata) 32 50% 20% Poor Low X
Comments: Base of trunk is above adjacent lot. Trunk has outgrown planter. Excessive limb weight.
Structure is forined by five leaders that form weak attachments. Adjacent curb has buckled
along both sides of planter.
honey locust
131 (Gleditsia triacanthos) 10 50% 50% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Declined canopy and fonned by codominant tops.
honey locust
132 (Gleditsia triacantl�os) 7 50% 50% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Has a small wound along trunk. Canopy is asymmetrical.
honey lvcust
133 (Gleditsia trracanthos) 8 50% 40% Poor Low X
Comments Gowded-growing conditions has formed an asymmetrical,one-sided canopy.
Monterey pine
134 (Pi�:us radiata) 20 30% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Has girdling roots. Trunk is outgrowing planter,and roots adjacent curb is raised. Canopy
is very sparse and beyond recovery.
Project:Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 17 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
ARBOR RESOLIRCES
professional consulting arbor�sts and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
+�
L L � � (a
� � � � � �
� � � � � � �
� II L II � L v � �
L O \ dA o\° 0 O � � 41
d a-.+
� +- 0 � � 'N � � � �
� � N � � � L O �6 `�
to O m rp m U �ro � O "p
TREE/ p v n 3 n = � = � °1
TAG " f6 � N
� o �j o i � � O
O Q
NO. TREE NAME � _ ° �, ° p � N = a
Monterey pine
135 (Pinzis radiata) 23 50% 50% Fair Low X
Comments: Declined canopy,and recovery highly unlikely for this species. Trunk is outgrowing
planter,and adjacent curb is damaged.
evergreen pear
136 (Pyrz�s kawakan�ii) 11 40% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Multiple leaders and has been excessively pruned in past.
evergreen pear
137 (Pyn�s kawakamii) 8 50% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Excessively pruned in past. Canopy is asymmetrical due to crowded-growing conditions,
and there may be a girdling root.
evergreen pear
138 (Pyn�s kawakarnii) 12 50% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Has been excessively pruned. Canopy has a low-growing form.
evergreen pear
139 (Pyn�s kawakamii) 7 60% 40% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Has a wound along trunk's base.
Monterey pine
140 (Piruis radinta) 16 40% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Adjacent curb is damaged. Declined canopy and beyond recovery.
Monterey pine
141 (Pi�iT�s radiata) 19 50% 30% Poor Low X
Comments: Declined canopy and recovery is highly unlikely for this species. Adjacent curb is damaged.
Infested by red turpentine beetle.
Project:Hyatt House Hote/at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 18 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
ARBOR RESOLiRCES
professionai consuitin9 arbori5ts and t�ee care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
� +, +�
� � � � �
L L f6 � @
� 0 � � � �
� � T � � � �
+' c � a� � �
L o \ ao \ � p ` °' °'
a �
� 'a=, O � O +_' O � �
i
v '6 ++" C +-+ � � � d O
� C in in � .L � -a v-
TREE/ o v° m � m � \ � � �
TAG Y � o � o ;� o � s �
� � o � o � o +, � o
NO. TREE NAME � _ ° v, ° p � N = a
honcy locust
142 (Gleditsia triacanthos) 9 30% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Canopy is very sparse.
cork oak
143 (Quercus suber) 20 70% 40% Fair Moderate X
Comments: Structure consists of multiple leaders that form a broad canopy. Poor structure.
cork oak
144 (Quercus suber) 5 40% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Sparse canopy. Multi-leader structure.
coast live oak
145 (Quercus agrifolia) 20 30% 20% Poor Low X
Comments: Has a very broad and extremely sparse canopy that is beyond recovery. Has excessive limb
weight and a substantial level of deadwood. Should be removed immediately due to a large
crack where four main leaders originate,and above that contains weak attachments. Tree is
at severe risk of breaking.
coast live oak
146 (Quercus agrifolia) 17 40% 30% Poor Low X
Comments: Sparse canopy with excessive limb weight. Poor structure.
honey locust
147 (Gleditsia triaca�atlaos) 10 30% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Roots have formed mounds in lot and raised adjacent curb. Very sparse canopy.
honey locust
148 (Gleditsia triacantlios) 8 40% 50% Poor Low X
Comments: Adjacent curb has been damaged. Sparse canopy.
Project:Hyaft House Hote/at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 19 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
ARBOR RESOLIRCES
profess�onai consultin9 arbor�sts and tree care
TREE INVENTORY TABLE
SIZE CONDITION
�
0
.�
� � � �a �
L L � � � j
� Q � � 0 �
� � � � o
c � a � �
� �� L �� L �
L � O � p O � Q„ •F-� �
� �„r � � � � 0 (6 �
L
� � Y C �--+ � \ O � �
� � N N � L �~ � ��
� � m (� m V •(6 � � �
TREE/ o v ii � n — � = � °'
�
TAG � .� � � � `�° o � � Q
NO. TREE NAME � _ ° N ° p � �, _ �
honcy locust
149 (Gleditsia triacanthos) 9 40% 40% Poor Low X
Comments: Adjacent curb has been damaged. Sparse canopy and poor structure.
honey locust
150 (G[editsia triacanthos) 9 50% 60% Fair Low X
Comments: Decline,as with adjacent locusts,can be expected.
Project:Hyatt House Hofel at Vallco Park,Cupertino
Prepared for:City of Cupertino 20 of 20
Prepared by:David L.Babby August 25,2014
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist� August 25, 2014
EXHIBIT B:
SITE MAP
(one sheet)
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino
City of Ca�pertino Community Development Department
"\�
�\ LEGEND
EXISTING TO REMAIN
h� {� -_-_: EXISTING TO BE REMOVED
8 �`�� �.
�0^ ��P
�oj>' ,f
� �i �� NOTE
.
s'• �
; .�� i� a;';. �.�.P �5 �` �� 1.REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR
03, ; �� `�,,✓� �54 �� TREE REPLACEMENT PLAN
'i �_ ��'� "�. 2.EXISITNG TREES AND LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN
,} � �. I (' .. ,� k52 �
SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE
/ , , � $ ���:` �
, ,? � _�r% ; , x�
I i' >f� : «+9
I r ' i i ' ��
' ',� l, . < � aae \ ..�...\
'��
r .� � _ \
' 1 , .-4.. 1rd7 ..
� �b� �a� � � � � : . Mae
�, ,` ..'� � :
I ; �,��' _ � i �, `�E�d��__�5
�� , I rY�`Xto
o � �
� �� ( -�}/' �i�\ ��� . f f� �O � �
,�� � ; - : %�` � � � �,„,z F
� -� ,
; � � � , � � � �. �a, F
� ' ''�„ I ;= � ,' ; i i ' �����J�' /� /wj �\
, � � ; i�$' �p39 �r�A �
� � � 1 ,_ ,���; -,.-' � i ; �� 5� �7� � �
r' ���r '�� , I ,� �
� � '�J ��_ �.i �� ' �; �:' � i i �'��6)�` xae \� \�
O � � j � -j.�«:' I �_I/ �i� �j� I ���-... I .# � 5 \ \
` 3� ;, `% i I -�` .�',��^;'� i `.�.,} �. \,_\ \ \�\
T �� � l ' / I I�'; ' . � X33 �
� � ,� ��' - � � � � �� " - ���� , � � , f�� � e �
•Jl ,� -1 � I I � �"� x_ \�,�� ��I; r,2 �\ �
� 1 � ' f . . . � �---1 � I � , �' .w." ' ,� , � ', . � � »3t �\\ \ \.,�
i L-1 � �'� � .
� � '��f �'�..-��' j � j i-� �Ii i F�C1STING ASPIdALT P,4RKIN6 LOT ' ; � '' p°'o �y \� �
Cv � i i y � � �,`- � i i �-�1 � �'TO B�FiEMOV�B , � � � nxa � �.
i" i i L_y � i "�� PORTION OF EXIST.PLANTER SHALL
� � l � � i i i , � � i �'`� � � , i+i� REMAIN INTACT TO ENSURE PRESERVATION
1 '� �C'� � � 1 � i I . .' i .i x2e
i , i i �-7 � i � v'�� � � -i OF TREES#14,15,16,20,21;COORDINATE
r\ �� , � � i � �_� i � i " V^ I i e ti �k25 �4 W�ARBORIST AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
� I-�L � �. � � i i � � i , � . �V1�// � �.,� �
I I I I L'.7 i � y\_. \ �� i� � I-. ' 1�' M23
'�� `� �'-�;� �n � i .� j i � r"'.* .��� ��� �.`�^\ � i' �7����.�',rp azz EXISTING WALL
�{ � i �� �7. ,�t��J� .� � I ��yl�'?t i� i �: _ � •��� �' �� 1 �y TOBEREMOVED
.�� . .' �l , / >r R/ fi' , . I � .I �, �i'� � � �y ' �ti; I � ��1
Y�L i �I +�. . �� -� � �
,f i n i ���", � , j ,�
I r��a' �< I� j ^ y, 't� ��� �"<� ��� � � �' EXISTING CELLULAR EQUIPMENT
�b � i� i.��l . � � i�.� ' � i l� 'i���'� d�.l�""�. � i i TO BE RELOCATED
' � EXISTING\C�1 \7&1�T�'E$S � �� �1 `� � / � V � '�/ i + ' REFER TO SHEET A-1.0 SITE PLAN
' � � S�'�r • ,�. �i .._ _. �u•i � i �' ' ��Y.�/�� � ^� FOR NEW LOCATION
i � �TO BE REMOVED � ����� �1� � i � �' � �•(� � ,•,i 5
` J, � ,
,;
. � i �i i ' _'' �-� � `i :<\ yti�� �� C a„
..
� ; �1�j . ._� � ,�� .: , f�,,,. , ��.�i_ , �.`'�• , / i.�' ^+
r ._ . , r -r� , � � i � .l,, `-��Y� .'�' � . ��� '"'`' �
1 ,.� . 1 � .. � . i,i / `�.s- y�1 ; . .. I V ,-, ' ..,_.�., _�'n....}' 1�7 �t' _� .
. .
/_ ! 7 '�► \ �/
� ��'� _ 1 `�; J ��/r �` i � x.vtt v�� ,� . ���� .; _ � ����.
rii M h � 1 i1�.., / ;,�...
. ' 1 ' A � i / l c-� ^1 K ..-.... .. �
I / � � I � � / �\ ` \�.,\ �.
. _
� � ' �
� ��y�, � �� ,�a�� � �)i
I � •� ,�r 'j�` ,', �..._ - S '� . � .. � -y,i' � (�i��;� *' +ii�i�,_�� �\ }� :i� »io `\
� - -- (�
��I ' �e - / J, ,i` ,� rl ,,r
. : _,, ` .-- __T '�
� �� �� ��s EXISTING SIDEWALK - �-� EXISTING SIDEWALK ' � ' \\ � `�
Y ` �..
�� �"�� ,v'�� �� �� TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED ��\�`a ;�
l ��a l !:� ,r ,�� � ---------------- ------ '=_°.� =——
.
� �:�' __�y/---��r�-= z^^'��--!p -- -_ - - -- — —�_,..�.�.�-.�__—'--._ __�� --��,--- EXiSTJNE��—----— — —— \ � � � `',�"
J r ��� L �Y �� �— _'
� `1 . " �N ..::.J T y ' /��^� " ,-� "' - �TO BE R , . �r v.-c-' i If\ .
m �/ �'� .'� ` . .� . . ._... `.` .. I• ...�-r- y---�- T�--+��� �is`\j�-� ��arn-\a.� ->x` `..,� _� _ x� i - � � _` OLJ� . ��� xa ��`� �'��
�e 1 4' , - -.r..
` ;:
� � . +� - � _ , tt r� `" �'� ��� �� ','*,�.-����_ �� " ;. d ,
�� � �r , �� . , � , , �_ ,,, � � _ � ._ (
,� _ �
. /.i! �. � . . NB�5�•�6y.... . hY��... { \ �� � � �t 1 I tt X \ �-_... �tv3--�.r i <��.� �i~,�� �-_____ ' `� .
�R .�. �y �1 / / \ 1 I i719 1 I' '_�_
� y � � t5'iG\I � � I7 ji l 1 ,� tt f[--�' � �:
`/ . %712� / / � �_� � � p11 V ,� yy �l�1 I tt � / � � �
� D
�. /� NBevS'I5'E n5.ie' � �7L—- SS.9E' r,t.� I�,. .�`,��-.,.,.i���T V f:,.. ' .. � i ,. .;.t. ,r.:.__.,,.�. wliz _.��'i�� i ; 2s�T��\ �------------ � - ..
� __�..�_ y "! � � w _. _. . .. .. -,
.,� �„ Y_:..
_ � �Y �'.. � l. .,. �.� ..,. . � . \-e� . _ .'�y_,�, "1G_..s./.r. .....1... .��. �,s`'i- __ ,
�
�����.�-- ; , . .\' .
, �
����
..IyZ �l " � /�� � � �-...,� ' _� x.y��\t'.
- -- � ' �""�� PERIMETER ROAD � -�� -� �-��- � �
_N . _ ,, .
�. ,
Q 'yi,_'_ ' � ' �
^ ` ♦� ..��1.^ I \��\�' .
�—R 52B' 8' . .� �
_ �
.. . ._.__--' � __ ._..---'--�_-.,�
.., i'.--'--`--_._.___-_----'-- ._..._._......---
i �k�2B.7. .
� � d=02'1502' ! . - `ti�
__.__
I I i ----`"._'- �
I / ' .._.._,._.--'i --
� � � � -�—�__; -.____ '__ ...__.---.--�__-__:_-_-,,\ .
, -- � _-
� _._..._.�__ ___._._._..__--�- � _ ,
, -.--.__- - -
____._._ _
_
� _._._.� _
� / I �� i . .. / ,... G '' _._ ' n� � .L.. � . . _.
1 I � ,-�f� _• .. � ... ..... '�� . �� - _ ��r . .
....
.r. __`.
__ � ' ... ,..,�� . _.._. , }, � r� .T._.. t
�;
n �`,
+-'`�i.,-'{� j
_ ,
, ,. ; `',I
_� j � —. -�-�� �,.\.
_.:. ,. YI ..
.--. _"
i
I ' ....... . . .. . .: .--.�_ _-._' , . , � . � i. . � .. . ....... `
; i ; .
.
i+ � ' ' `�
... :' �__, _.-...._� ,..��. :'�. � :
�j-- .. �- ' �.... ,.._- : �;� . :
��I� . � . . . .
� HYATT HOUSE HOTEL AT VALLCO PARK � G E N E F O N G
DEMOLITION/TREE REMOVAL PLAN � A S S O C I A ( E S A—O.2
H YAT T �����14 i�±a�.rsrwnon e�vo�n crc��
WOLFE R011D&IMiRSiATE 280 � nncnaecn�ar wnr�Na�x��uaiea�cxr
house CUPERIINO,CAUFORNU o �v ss� w 106N0.:1345P ,�,,,�„5,:: ,��,.��U,���:�x
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist° August 25, 2014
EXHIBIT C:
PHOTOGRAPHS
(11 sheets)
Photo Index
Page C-1: Trees #1 thru 9 Page C-7: Trees #111 thru 122
Page C-2: Trees #10 thru 20 Page C-8: Trees #123 thru 130
Page C-3: Trees #20 thru 42 Page C-9: Trees #131-138, 140, 141
Page C-4: Trees #43 thru 83 Page C-10: Trees #142 thru 146
Page C-5: Trees #84 thru 102 Page C-11: Trees #147 thru 150
Page C-6: Trees #103-110, 139
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino
City of Cupertirto Community Development Department
David L.Babby, Re�ister•ed Consultirzg Af-boYist°
PP.'V^
���§
z. _
.,�_>� , ;',
�
; �"`��°�� `° � ;,s�
���° . ��`, f� �
�� �;
�� `� �
v .., �� �yLp�� g �:
- i
° -�� t � t �<.
�;� �,.��t`�, � �i • �,.y�1S,�; � � -
� �
�Y
���� �'� `��_ ����� .� ���
�* �E :1..� �z�
.°.�.� .A '�'�s' ? _ x�r.�' .� .+ie�t�
� y ���.
��� ,.: �h. � �`� ��� � ��
t 4p w ° {� � i"^
�f.# �,�"�•��y �-,��,��1,�� ��� " �.�
�pa .'► � � �,�3�i r���ri �Y.
3
,�� }4^ ��•� ��'t '� j �����.A
.d'��.. �+�w... �t�,-�:. 'i .pr.�:tb ��I;'��� wp._..�
ry T
� -� � t�..�'�@'" ,.4���«M
F,�a,� � � ` :J a�." �"
�"� i i .F.� a i�� 4a' �„r��w� �F���.
' ' fR' _ e�► � ��"'?,,� ``
i 7 �
� _.. ;.:._... i,�4��;s"�g t...�,T, �..
. ��� '����������� � ��
.��
� �� �i
�'����-' �r����t�I�, ��
' '�.....��� ...
�` �_ �
s. ���F�� ��:
� - �' �. �
�� �� �� �
♦�£ s°
�^�.� � '..z4�
,a
��°$�� a,-: ,� ,�� . " ����' :
'�`�.�'� �" 4��: *'-?°�
������ � ,- �4 � ��` .�
�.� �_��' .�_ ['j�
�� � �� F � �rd � �
� �� � r � � � ' �> ��
�. �� '�` -_
� �
e'• #r �r[� ,�" `{#` '«,�y.
�� ' ~'��.� �� � �����
.F � g �'.r� -e��.J . �, ..
r� � �m� ,� �� ������f ��4
t s..T�. ���� s� ����
'��'� `�� � ����v�'�4 F
, , �V
.� t�' �' J. '� ... 7.
r- # � `� .�.? .,�
� ##r.� �P �, a �,� �_-< .� ..
�!. �� ���-'� i 9� .. ��. "`��
a. s�.°g# ,zm.,g� ,-.,�..,a � i�
'M °�
�� ��.: # .F+ §���$�� ' r�"r
�� n�A��� � ����R`x .
r.
Aar�ust 25, 2014
�+'�°�` ��` �` � '�'��, �4. § �;
� � �F��, ' � �' �
�i _.,. (�}�. »� ... 'f - .
��.�,2%Nt�«.w-.` .. .. d, �' '.�_. +�
� ...Y §�, � � �n�!d S&'� '�V
s�* q � A�� � �� � �} �� � �� �7 .� ,
�� � � �a'� ���� �¢`�� ¢ � �A
_��`� '�,: st d4 arFa . ��_ ��: '� '�
., � � :� � _ � �
�� � � s� � k� ,�a��� ��; � ��
�`� °'�'��� �`.�, �1 E';r- ip ,� ;� �: .€ �,
� 3i[r�x `� ' -. 's� -`� '`p �?' �`s,� ' '� �°�Y �
,�' � �,� '� '�`� �� . ���� '���=s '�� 1'
F��� � ` .. . � � �� �' °u'�-,
� � �'� ^e,h �; �r ��t R s �,.. '.�� `� '� 7�.'<.
� ` �t � ' �.' ��_�., j� ��.�� ;,�a`�'�� ,+' �a� ��" �,.�
�}.. _..it� � ��'�`� � ` � 4� f:`� 'A
�a. �� �� �� �," � "�_.^ ,,qsy f:
s '�� S g`�: a�"_ �, . . .� �^'.���F
�� ��, , °�? '��t• �`�t 'x, 't� �"�`7'�.e�,q`s� r; .
g,.s��� �� a�� /r .�,_ �'x ���, 't .e�°�"�,#R t#�.°3 � �,�,
� ,��t; ;� • ,�� �e ' s.�` +a .�"j't�$v � �A
���� . .a1 ��g �"...n � . y,� � �, y f +�s.� �m �� �%"n�^ � �°��:'
�.� � �,
�� °�Bo��Y � �`_ , ..
�$ .`� '4 �5r'� .{,'11,q�' �� � t d�,<'? •�m�v
�
� � �: a
'a' � t i' r�t K . �"� �'... �.,�,��il ai1�� �j � '� " i�s '£p�_.
�� a, � � x'�'��{� �.. ��3 F.�' *� gC;,�@ s,�'w'x ;Y.� , j+ ���/
i�� � �v�� ���"-- ,.7��_ �
.. '3 �.i°� d3 � . ,� �• a# ��� �. ..
t . .» «ti"'w�., �� -fr,' ��'�,��'.� ��t'4�.�fi��.'t 4e;� ���e tq a ,a
i . r �� � 2 .�'�,�" N , e @ �
.
4 t � • � '"
q��� RY p:'A l k�� t
� ... �` � �,��X i �. ..w1 �^�.,iC1� 3 ;��iP4i','�v
�� '� �.. t'�i'� �a a t�
� �'�.��. t��'r }'�� r h��.� , d>�a _
�' '� �' -r - 'a ?�n�` � � �` � � ..
���: a. ��;�" . e,� ��.� . .
�.��u �1��4i - �.:�
� �� ;�:�",�i �
�_ a -� +[� .
''� �'� .�. � �t� �..
� � '� r-� ��"�`�: ��'���
� _.� �
�f . .��� '�, (��' _
P � 4� �_ t'�. s^'A'
��� z �'."c` s - .
.��`'�� �.� � ��' �"`'�" � . � - R� a,�' ?`a
�:� �4�'' '@� s .�`rr _ - '� °i
���.f ;`�� �� � '��P ��h � i�
k. - ;� .. a ���r .� � ���'*, ,� �� � .
� =��� � � � � - � f .�
���`� `�'
'� � �& r�
� ��' �"
��
�
sR�� w�,� .. �.��`�,�<� .
,. - ,�`- � ,.-z
`.. � '�..ry?�^i � � �,���
ic. � �� � :,i.:
�a. € � �,� " ��4._� � .. •� a�-°
„ *� * "- �a�'�li""�' h � •`� ��.��.�,�> � ���--
��y ,h����� �;� 1��� s � .. � � �w
�g,aa�!�"�, _�r 9 �
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page GI
City of Cupertino Community Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist°
August 25. 2014
� ��� • �� � ���4 �` ���. - '
3 E�,$.� � ��, �_�` � � '�
�',';�- 1�_ � �.f:, g�`" � t'
i� g`-�, yb�'- " . - . . a �, ¢ � r.
� .
a:� �= ° �; }r � ��-��.
,
. ,
�,,, ��„ � ;��� . . '� �, �� �,�� � �. ����� _ p
�.r.-3,t�. ��' , !�`� ° � ���s �� * � : � .�
' � �-x, � � . � .,a � ,� y � `A
(y '� . # ,- �„ r '� - `�a., "'� !k'.� � -
��, v#w.. "�!t�,�# ,�� _ f� �L s�...+' ��.� ' �� z §� .. °3 ��, � tgk���� a�
-.. e
. � r
�
�'r'' �, }� � ....,, r aA�.,� � .. . • , . ,'�e°�?-= �=
. ,
4
.
�
yr•''� �.,. ,; .:. f": ���'. 4 ,; t. 4.. - �� � '€:_ ' : - t �-3-
A, :�. . �,� , ,��:: � � �.�
a �' � " . ` : � a_s, � � t
,�,� -�, a s . ,.. �
�.,�� a� �,` �r`��` �� £,,,�� « � "`� � , . � �.
; .
r y��.` ,.; .e k��n�±"'r.� j� —,y; - � _
�. � ��� �� �� �� �
�h�- .�"; �� '4 +�.< . y"+. y€. � `��€�'#�,s _ '$ �� g sw. '�.� '�. ����r
. ;.
, ,
...,�,: . , � . -�� ..e... r ��,.:. ai �n F sr r>� g�;
' r. i
�
� p ..., ; ' . '. � ..� < „ � � Y � � % �<�`
�
�,..,f �� ; � <
, r'a:$�,� �'�a�� "�dy..�{'. ' .; ��'�,.,��'�� �.. , �' ..g �'f�°�'� ��� "�� ��� _
�
...
. :
`�� �
� M'�.`.i. - � c�'.�1 � #.�a�' �� �� �a_. ��, s },,:� R '��^ � 3.t"�" ,��°o,
� „ _
„ ,. ,.
. _ .
, _ Y �, �»�.. � y-�
P�' �.', , . $t�k� :'. '� 4 6s`'��e �:`�,°r.,;� .a ��`_. A-.' ���� �,€,�¢E � � {:�� �� _
., �$ *
� � �
��.F. ' ��.. .,.��.� .:::. � t�".... - �� _ ���$�° #
E �
� �. ..., , ., �. � '.�
. " y, � . a -. �a, � ,� .�'4 � '� F i��,� �k.�s
.. a
° `
,- �� � s
��. . ., - �_ ,v , .
.0. .!fxy" ,j�. . 0'��., $ �. rm...) `P yf . �-,vyM,• S�r�"� �� � �F „s� ���� .��
1C � � ���'� �.:. # �
C � �'., � �� ��e
���' �. �1 y�, h'�" �' € � �' � � �� ��"! � � �e�� . �i a���.��_"?�� �
fY F f �S �t.: �� � �"'rr,%, s�- ���.?'�� ',�'� _ �: '� ,.�.�° � . '",�.':_ ,�� �'
� y�'. '�,.`(`"�� ��q �� �`° ��,�s,� � . � ��` j 5�-. �y� . a t .� §�' <,a ���..'.
'�: ��.i{� �ti��,�, ii��_ �E��i"_, �,... '`�� '�t" �� � � 4 � ¢"` _����vtz,i t�'.•�.�-,$�`':
"�. �.�y-' "�._ �c$,: ��:t't""; •a�oy-. �.�°° '3�'�� �'`� ,mr*��� -� °�" �"„�, � '`t� `` �} ,�rx ,��' .�. �.�;'.P
� r � ? �
•'... s..'°.0 's::.,` f ���.,,.�.+^ .�.'# ;� �€x:�r �'°' � :�>:$ a�� ^��:. ".(��SF,�' 3e� sq �. a"'� ,s�„�`-*"
r d _ ,
.
,
� � �6`,
. ya:4 � ,3�1' _ - �� 4�°si ��r x^ ��-N i .4��. � ..gf
�y�� i .'i ,, ��,� i .if` � e s '�aa;� '' �� ,,�" e +'�` �'
"a.��r.',�� '�y `�. �, �` ,�' �*_ �, � •d` �= °'� r��, W�t�4'`,s � #��
•e .
:. .A � .
�E�:� , . . ; �� �_. .. _. , s �� '4�. a�"� .�°'='�'� �� :- �..t ,E:� ��, �
. , "�`^+
•
,� `t .�s #� � � ,,s': ��" ; �
:s.. `�i. �. � , �-..c. ' ,4 •�l' ,µ,. �%. �C', ; Y �" � ;.�' �
�� ,� . .. .'4$ �i � '"�"p, , r �'a�"�' � "`'°� ,�°' .:fi �� � �s%�r '�g ��
,.. : � .., ,.� ;.�-
•�.,
� �,�. .. � ,Y. �. ;; �� . ::�, � � .$ `��. �,� , yu�� .:�
4f��.� � ' py,, �� .Y; P,r=:� �6�.'�:' .�$?+i�',�., �, F�' . 1 . . +�`'�`
:sx ,�a}µ r;ti}..' z. � r`€�° a...$` - �b: s.f', 'y` ,1. �� � ,�:: ,:s:.F g�4`'e .:,,,�`
�.�' � „,�. �e�' :¢ �.» °�' . y�'��"�'; r �.,f-. „�',x . sk' - �t`,��a
{.• - ;d y`� t�„ ' �F, t. -�.,. - ,.z"'� �� e� _� �$
, . �
,_
'��,�" 'dr � � m� y ��»,..:`3 9� '� �. k . _
< L� g ; ,�' .,��„ e.£� � � �� �; P�,
. � ,., .
� ��� '�! .A '$�-�..i ''ti����'-<..�. .�`�` �, ��� i � <��'"� ;,��` ��.��#+�'a�' 3 �,.8�'
, � , r -. . n , > >_f . . �� . � ,- � _ ,.a y= �s
aea.,,�.�s . . .� . ' .. �.
� ,
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Czcpertino Page C-2
City of Ctcpertino Community Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Ar•borist° August 25, 2014
�
. � ,#
:�_ � ;�
�.;;.
�.�-�� � � ��
>�m � "� �° � �;� �
� . � '.��` k� ,�"--.��.`�� ��'�r +�
�t` � �� �'`` � �
�:
; �` � ���
.�
�,_` ��� � .�y _' � a
f�� �. ��, ��`��',
�
` a' ��--}� �� �°���
��� �,s � �� � ° �.
v�"sa � �.� ..�$,.
� � �
_r�. � a�' : � „� � � ..
���k; . ��. �.__ �� � ���.
�
� Q � #r �
:�. 'g�'� �,.� r��s
_ '� �c a!`€,4s �'�; �.��.� � .
�..,,'� ;� ag�a ����
`Y'��"� °��, g ��$`� ,a:
,� � 6 � � �����
�' �-y�.'"a`��.- �."3 ��3���� �
?. ..�.# � � �6�.. � �,�� '���.P..
�~. k r g����� �y � �i.-
� f� � a�S �� ��� � .
F � P �- +� ��� a
�'�t�\ s���yg� �� ir� �i���'�' '�.: ��
� �>� �h � ��;� k �yp���
�-� 4�� s� �•. 4 .z �+�+ �a`�{ tri .
���:�_� ��' a����.r�� ,':L,v�vc+;`��*:r��'�o,. �F
�
�..
�. ��
���` �,�.- t ��
=�.'� "' �
�� �
� ��
L �°^'� �'x
5� �,��6J �.,Y^�
4P'�`�,� ��
� �.x e"� "w�" y�°
�t ,�, � � �„ . �
�,
aeo- � � �`�
���
� y��� �" r
-� * z �' `��£
'g ',�
' �� 4
.�� ��, �
, �a "' � � � �° ,�
�,� � x" E <
;��'�' i�
��°';..�'� - `'" �r�,� �,,� �e
.t�-�z. $. ��a-}«*� ��'�( �� , �-���" �
,
gqy�� a 4• *
i�
��� 1 �r
��'�f.. ..�,�, 't` � � #.+���„$'�a�� F �
�� a. �. � � r-�' ..
�. � e� �r
9� ��.��4 � f�R��� ���'�'�"*�:���' . $'� ��i� ,
�� � �E' ��j�l� � :k� �j '��..
#�•� �r�,,..��M� . '�,' R,,�` �s ..
�'� 6 �� x =a . �t r.
�' ,� � ��� ,�� :t
z �' � � �,6
�;' �� ,.: .<�: , ,,
� {�� � � _r�' �� a�;
� F�. � �,� �,�� � � , � ��
� a'�8,w�. y�, �i-�':: . j �,� �
� :,� � u� ��,.,y
� + t ��� �,��� � � f e
� �,a�'.�:�.,, .'�^..���x <�„� ,'l.a� �����"� , r.�
���i�� ���,.�'.��
Hyatt Hoi�se Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page C-3
City of Cupertino Corrimunity Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consi�lting Arborist° Ai��girst 25, 2014
= e� � ��
� � _
� ���� �� ,
� ��• ��° �4�� `� _'
_j� �� ,�►��.�� `�
�� ��'J ,�9���.;� �� ��.
�� ��. ��
� � �°
��� e�' ����.;�'�4� � .
�' ,�° @� �, ���
,;, <,_;, x; �,' �' ��`�S ,�y�"..,�*,�
�---� ; � ���� � ��:����
g 9.: .0.�. � i��. �$:� � � ����.
'T� ° � ,�g ...
� :.�t � �� . #�v.� Y F��
y �`� ._�c �'a.���°�� � ,s+�k�y v '�•
g �' �e�'"�� y� �!
��y, . fi �_. �` �'
� k� �` ., °� ' .�, {�� g�
r �
- ,��R - c k..�„��tlt.C,.�°�" '�' �`, }� 0.
� •�.
�'°-�',�'�� ��,� "� ���� "''� „_,�,� � �r
�' � �_ � �?�fi � .�, � �ac`' `� 'e"v3,
� T�} `� ,�� � �e'. ,a`; °^p g �,a �d �.a
� ' + `w..:�'� "4" . �,'rw+�.���.a.. ..,�, ri
` a�,. �� `4�: ,�'�"� ; � '
� , � '" � �.� � ���'�' �. d x
�` ����r��� '�'�F• � �� ��l�, �' �K�� �'� � , �
.rF�,.�:•�..�� . �e���:�....�``,��`�.� w$i . :i�l�� . � . .�,
t ��'x.
�� �. . >� i���j � �e
, �` � � �� ��a ���}. '" f �� =s � .s
� '" ' ,�,�� �� �Y �
�i��f � � ���� �.� �,����
��� � „ Y4 � � �� w ' ?� �� " -�� �; �� �`a
�� ""' �'�`�. :: ��` � �gg _.g�� ... ���.� �_
8«. .. � '�.�2'_ ���'�`# �p� 5�"�° ��T� F<v'is�k�, 'g�'��
�S ..
� ' �` �.;��+&a .,, � +4�t. :
�' � , -�...,' � - .
� , a � 0 T� � ,�
,.� �� � � ; �� ( '; �� ��
�'� ��,� n _. � � ° gi'��`°y �• ���t {;- �,
m _
�,� ,. � t}$�' .��. �,. ��^ � �4,`�"i�
��, �� ����. � .���� " ���
a �. .��° "`"�,�,�,� � <�� ,�, .'�+�
� ,� ' N a.' ��° .9. �� �`i �. ..,( t:�„ .,���w�`w�,'•
�°� �"`' Y.� � ����F � ' '�
"'� i�� da��� r.. �,.
'� �� r ,r ipPi" �� ' ?�a� � �` ^�.;..�
,y.� �,1�rr_��� '�pr� .ec _ „��� ��� •- � +
��'`t. ,,1i�,i„� ��t��'�';�,"'� `x. � �_4 k �
,�
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino
City of Cupertino Community Development Department
�� :� �., � ����
� �, ,��u'
�,
,� ��.
,�
��'�" � � >�, < �;,�;
�. �`_� .. . ` ,��„� ",p
€ �_ � . 3 �. ,�,
�`��$ �� � ��� � �i� � .r , �.$:�'�-.. 9.,:a ��b R
w,F`�a � � -.�s'�' �� ��;.�,:4 `m � " �_,.-.,.
€-
.. t h �y� " � ,�_ ��°"r'+t , .��$,.
h�'� �� ���t . {����.:' �t�',�
� •�,�« ,�,� � t�-
'wr' ^� e`F°,f'`v" ����{e k �S i '4". �� � ", ,e
�,y,��, �k'"' �a
'M" 4,i ' a"A' �` p�'`.,n .'Mr� . >y su,�aYA'
���t�- �� m�, . �� ����'g�`�+�
� :+ � �pd!?,t_��w ' " ��R•�� � �r�"`
`�, �� t� ��� �.> ��,� ��^ ,
�+�t�"' �,,., *� F e a�y�Y �. • ��k� ��� p.
� �t �� .a�,�A ���. y� .,y,� �,' �y °�' "� A,r..,.r+
�� � ,�� � �tE L�" �+ra1' �F w =
► .�,� �. �", J a+' �� � S�` ��*� Y �:,�.
���yy �'�t� ��i`"�y,:." ,i�"�'+�� ^ t���M
�Y��� �� .� � ,�!�� ���q ^y, .�,.� i,y..'��cA"� '`
�'�� .,. • �}�"_ x'7R,.3b�"� � .
�' h�
......-�+i,r
�� ,
,,>,_,x_, _� :_, , �- ,Y" ,,, , . . , , . .., .
... . ... � , ,.. „ _.. ,_:.. ... . _... __... __ ,....
;�
.. -� ..�. �� �
. E °'�.. .'g��.,
> -" ,
�.a:
(r � a � i
+��._: ' . �- ac ' �i .� ��31
�iir$�. ``+`^. '�' �' r � �� � '3� 8`
°`�"°' � �a�•`�d �'�'��`�'g'�'�, � °� �g �� �
°��� +t� �' �, -> �` ` .��%� �g�'��
*4°l��'� " , � �� � "� �� ' # �
� �
r . "y�y'�}b -t-�� ,. �� -�i _,���jj i ;�
if . #�f� � � LL �"[ �Y $��.: .4, :��
. �•
� � $
'Y^ a � ��� » fl - �gu ° ff� �'�
� . .
� ���
�:�,�� -., � �, e. .� � �' y.'_ °� i,a. �� �,.,
�""�'�.�. ,�� .,,,xyy a.. x s .�,,��
-. ,
., � �� � ��°~ � �
.� -_' ,
� ,, a� • _ : ,," � a � ,�`
' „ �
. � �` � "` � �` a �����
�' �� � � �t� ��
:, �.d�:�� '"� ,' � ��' '°�
��,�. �` >.� '�� � '�, Y�*
���� ��� +��� �4
�.. �'����"�.t,:c +�F.r;`��� a. �.. '�°"���� r-'�� �,
.., ,
� �.
..,„�.a, '�'�
..�. -� -,.w,... . - � _. . .__. b.
Page C-4
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist° August 25, 2014
- p �.
�; ,�.��,; � �
� �
� ,����° ��, ,�,R �� ,_
- � .�`��'� �� ��. �� . � y� �-
� �� �� �3�� �r
����`� F� �'.;� '�k � � x � �.�.
€'s �� � � "� �� �,� � ��
��.. �3-�= ,�.P •� � � � ��` .
R. �'asc� ��p°#�} ���;4� ,f�+�+ ,���� .
, � � `� ��� �, : �� , � ,
�e<..i> b r��"'�:�,' '. ,�,�`� �� �
. �. �i�«a';�a�'� r�i�-� �a,t,� X� �� .
,� �. ��k���.,� t�'� � � � � �i. ;��e
� �� ����� �, �_-�.
° +r� � �,"�;`�� " ;�§ k' +� sr � $
w.. ��`� �t �"c��°" �Y..:m� ��.,�,�C� . �- �, ,. � .'„��,,..p' ..
.,�e� --v iF -;� a$
°� �' � A� �� :�g'x
�� �Y'� �a :��� s`�,C� 7.. . ��t � '�i � _ - -
.� 5�3r�,�,�a.:",�� •���� �s;..� ;�.�" '�,,s�^'c�'� .ry.,��� `a�
t � ��.w`�y#�'�.�a�,a`�°;� °s...,���Fi�"� a4' � ar .�.!'§,:,� .. '� �� A'.;1.. .
��.� � - �d s �� §'c".,�.. A..,g � „ ��� � .
'>� '*� �*�` ��:1' ��*x, 5;:;.� .'� e�. y� y �,¢� ek :�.
��,. �� ��� ���.� y�3� � d,,, ..�:� � '�� ��:.. -�?�.',-a�:� i�°. �"�^.�S"'t�e�.
,� �
� � ��.
� x��� �`'����� �����x'rq�o. :� °.pP '�"x�,,S,r��*-�`' �..�:� ,.,��i.� 'L� ` �,.�� ��;.
�r�� „�. ��' �,y b �"h , ��,�., t°�, �4§;; t,t��.
,., �
,.� �. �>a,`�� � �� � , �� <
;
� ` , �„ ,s�s ���e� � ,.� _ �}r �:,4 ' ;� �
r ' r � ��� �� ° — � �+ ��
� ;�'� � � r��� ' � ��� y �+�
> .,^y. ..� . � ^s I ' �:
..,-�: . e. ': �'
,; a: .A�: :�.:� f� k .S c
.
.. � ,
� 1i. ��:.s; r�;:.t� , ...,.�.q ..
,. �
�. � 4
�c- - ' '.rz... - . .
, �'�.'"..�, ,.,m�� �t . w ,�
4 ,�, v,� •
m a., �yr�^'�..,. .'q, �i t � � _��
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cuper�tino
City of Cupertino Community Development Department
�4�
�,,:
�`g'
,.�:
�� �'� �� �
. M
, ' �'�� ?�:
� � ,�-,�,°'`�,�f�:t ��
� � �"�` � ? s �a =
. �.-�s "a `��#r `*r•tc
v'
��,,, � �� a��` �, � �
�. ��q
«�"� �m�n_.,� � .v.a��.� b.'e"����. - .
'",� � �� ��' �,. ����� aias;„
�� ��'s 3��� � ��-_ �. ..s1 r�' Y} _.=1F
3 '�,�,�-�� AC j:9+� � -�p�.'
.;,=1 .;��*°es�� . ,g�;§,�a. :# }'e_,��. �°� , .�..-
, ,� �_� �s�� ,� �,�r,; f� , � ' , .a��'°';�
�`i ` � rE
$ r�� g`�*s�;� �" �f� �,�"#�ef�«
���Mg£ �e �� k ��o�"���},�� ���; �aS.
� �� '�—
� ��� �. • ,� _tb �� �� w� �
� ` ��� '�'�"��
��
� ��:
d''���$'�B:� €; FC." .�t.��. ;� s��, "$":.
� � �y��'�t�g��. .. ' � . ...
� � . �� � .r�. �.
���� � � ' y� �
a . 4� y ^.�;s' '"�:'��. r�# • ��+
��
„�`�f �` . ' '�,, '�:s�i`� �e'� y�i ��„F�«,3
.. �� . .. . ._ � .o�,�`.� ...i. wi�"'.�
���.
��� =g�
�� �
�
: �;� .,� =a�
'��`.��`;�� ' �' �$�;
'�q��' " "�;��.
�� �,„� "� :
�'��`��� � 'a
. �� �� k� �`,4� ��
.. �d'�,
� �,,,., y f�.�
�, ��'...
r,��` e �
'�!`��� +�� �
�."�t.� ,. .��;�`�
Page GS
David L.Babby,Register�ed Consulting Arborist° August 25, 2014
� %� ' �' - �
� �� �� ����: -�.
i� � �;� �
:�
. ����� ,�'�°�
t.� ,= ..
�� � �� '�° �.
.; �.
������ �`� : � . , �
< ��` . _# � ,�s ,��°,`�,
'� s t „��'
e� �; ��`�S'�� §4 �-, �ry�ti:�y t
{� • '�� � � �� �, ,��� � �
�`� ��� -, 5 �� �k t�f'�� m °„ � 'e� ���' ,�
� ��' ,�•` t-�`� � ' 'r � .�
��� w.���� e. � �r.. �.,''""0 y ���r�, ..: ' �.�?�� "$°`��'�4'�� '�`"'�"�' '�
p � '°" �� *�, ��d'r'—:.s.es..aa',11 -��,.y•-ad.'���, � Rr :,^'��'y
� a,
� m: .. �_.-� � �'� ._� f�.. ''Y;.�{ a> b'�.z � ,.
a
. g�s � � �,�� tb '� rd`4; e [a f ,p..`.
� �} 2 ��. . f ��4��
;'�.�'� .�� � ,"' �;° a �. °"$' � y
� � ,� ,�'���.�. � `' . t � �•:� F ;f � ��:v.
. , � ��� Y= � � �� .�� �
- �" ,'`�'�� � �� ����� �'`-'� �'"��'�=
� ��� ;?'° 8 V a".�.*� �'�' �' °my�;
���„� � -��`,'.�:�;a. ='/$3
�' � �° . -,,� "�- "� � � ,�� �
_.��.,,a � x� �� �_� �` �r�M1s�y �
.�'�..°" t �; '—'� .':"�e�� �r "�
�,� � ' � �� � . ,
Ro..,
,: a��„.� � ��„ "
F� �
• � �= s�,t��,"E^
_ � � �,.. �� � ����
� � _..,�,. C'� ,�=' '. . `��.
� �.
. �
, ¢
, _ , �„ : . �. t� .��
�.. �:
�,
.� .
� �� ��� ¢ ���;
�� s s � . �;��`�-'
�i°-.g 3 . -.. � .
s. . �� '..;. ''g
�
3-3
� � .� ���� , �,�°°
�b:���,
� e �;�� ��� � ��,.� -�` �•.
. ��* y-. 'k��e ���'�$ �'6',`�°'�:,+..y .
������ ��y_� � '� �
� y ��= ' � �z°���'�.t:` ±t,���'� �.
� s � ��
.� �,� .,�
�- �� � �" .�, ,i :
� +�:�� t �����• ��� � <..
� �'� � � ���.�°���t� a
� �' � .�. . �.
.�
��s_�i rt�«ai A ��� "'��C"� �'s'�
��,µ�:,.��'..� '�
� r
� � � �..�
�-- '� �_
�`��
��
.�. e �m.�a� .
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Paf°k, Cupertino
City of Cupertino Community Development Department
�� � �€ _�.
��� � �� ��
' }� ,�w,� �'�..
�£�
� �� ���,.
,� t ��
�_������ �
.� Y;� ����'��` t��t�.
"+"'�e a��#�'� �#'�- � �l
#���+,� �. =��� �� , -{��
� �
��*. �,�t .:. i
... r�„3.� ii :°�$� b$� 1 � .
�_ �� ��°�u �..
��� � �' �
� -"r� - �` �eie $� a �t�
� 4°£q.��� ��� � ������ ���1..� .�..�
^7 y iPt � � ^'�� � a% n �a
�t � � 7a �s
���'i f� � N3 � ��.
�� ��' ���.,�*.�,��,€� .� �
�-° ,�, � �i.,�g,�
6� �4{c,
� � i«
�z ��.�a.�n ?L �' � x'� �►^v
� + �
�� c;
� w
�. �.�
Y�'� ° ���.. . �6 ,.;�
�� �y ; °'� �:� �3.�
_�._�
�:._ _
Page C-6
David L. Babbv,Registef-ed Co»si��ltirzg Arborist° Augisst 25, 2014
�� ,�����
� `_� R�� . ��¢��,
z�� ,,t � �� a� ��,
� x., �`. `� ��` .
�` � �
' { �
� � '� � �. ._�� '
�� � ��� `� � ;
;�_ ����.� ,+Aj�` ,,��x`� �,� ,� �x+�`�#
. �'� � '�.' t �' ���r'�; � �.:�
�� � ��_ � �� ..� ..
;. . ¢,��r��''��� _ #.'�� .��'. a.�,:;t� ��
'f �r .�-j� t� '��`
r�y,, �P•,
, ���`t �°_�',�'���� ��� ��"�°'.�ri,�' �� ' � e., '
��pp i y�
�'< � �bi.. # Q71R}- a41 i k S. �`��S.*�� p'hX�.�j Y
1e s
s '"z°� .
��-.=ta ,,,, �•��.���-- a�a �` lh,yt. � q r�.g€ � :
. �r�,��' �"F .� �€� .� s'�#�� �g�2 _
. "`�4 t .r�' t�� , ���.+ 4$ �, y,`.
+j{ �� btl 4�g�� f �,,,}p�� y''
4 °.x��2'�+�..� �`°�g„� �„�,� � ,{� y, 3°" ,�°�
. �y'fssal 2i�$4� n,.$� � e -f '� "� ��a�^11!� r 4
� ..� �•' .,�4�^'R�� ��tY`_�'f i$.. � �' ¢,�,^��p :a .
S � y,y
fi ,. 1` &�•a "y�' '?
�,'�3" .. c. �` ,�i K tik K.
� �,;�.,•�,^ ,.�� ���` �� �,�� a< ':�� � ��x +�
���` � '�t°"'�" �����"''� '�' `t- � ;
c r
��a ���� .,s�a`"',� a �� ��'• �� t'�� '� �:�. �r �w,',�
+w� , �l � ' °a ' � �„�,s i:a
, , a �
�_ .,.... . . ,. �
,..
�, . i _°s.4 "K'(, .a2�i1�►
, v,
}, _�._m , ,: -� . .
... "� .�r�__.�.� a . ^. �X .' ��
� �_ �'n a9° .. -. ....r.a....x,.,`�
. .. ..,.-.� .. .... ,�"8sz .( '�l.��
�.
��
�� �
��,`.
�� ��,.���W.��
��� � ��
; � 3 +1
�� •�� � 1 �^"� �";�•
E�� � ;� �
� '•_ ;' �.�� �E`,
���„�,�.._.. '�i `� � ,�
-t�. ; .� �
" ' �r. ,
�� � � a. ��,
��«�;� ��.��f�
ryr .`� �,. � s a,
, �
3° ,_�� s �,
��������: � �
. . �� ��O
� � . � , �� f�:
��s_ � ��¢���
j��::
�'` �� '�.g
{ � � � � .�>
�'�� � ��: � ,
� � �� �,� ����„� � � �_
��". ��� •,r�` ���,,,
�Y,�'�. , .�,'�P � �# a
�� � �,t
yk" '3a'`� -���",�."' '$_'.�`e' '?q„`�" �.
..�� �@`43f ���'� '�
�°#� ,���" 4„�,;.w- �� sr�
�� �.
a�. � �:
�s�. �� ... ��� ' T�� � ��
� � � «..,�
� �
� � r. �1 � �s
��=a."�'.' 3 .
a�-
� ��
��:'� N 1'� .�:����.��......t,l'�
Hyatt Hoicse Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino
City of Cupertino Community Development Department
�� �
�
ffn T !
� $,
��� � ���y �
e:� ' § �� :
��. � ��� ' -� �;� - �
� � - �. ������ . ��
y �'�:� � ��_f p �'��p� '�M s. ��U
R� . ��.g, �° g�:'� ���_� :� �. , �� � �
.'6"#'�`F' �.;� ,�•.�g ,g'�"��: . +s#�,'�,
��; �` �i� �'� � �� .E
� �. ,.
� �`��,� �`,� z�: ` � 3 .�-�',� �.�''�!'
% �e �� ^- "�� :;� i� ...q �� ..
�.�''" �� k�i�'°'a€� . ��. ��.
� F���_'. �4 ��n�? - ��� �,�"°�
� � � # ..��..� �`"� "�'�,� �`�.�����& � �t
��� �,`� Y , :�:� � ��t , .
�z - �` � � � ��'
�� � � ,
$;��'�,', �� ,� °��� '�� :� � g
�:� F � `�„X � ' � �N'�.
�i'� �° Y� �;�
' ,,, 4�' » �r, � � �'°
�+� '�.�.,.,e�a,�. -°'"� `i
�� �.
�i�}
� ��,� L ` ,c
��y;t�.�'Yt � _
�..
°a
�� '�.������
� , ���}� �:
�"�A*.�'.�
� � �
� ' � ,
� ���� �
�..
�� �.�
�,x �,��
1YK
_ -.,...� e-��� .;
. � ,t�
Page C-7
David L.Babby,Registered Conszclting Arborist° August 25, 2014
tj
�s
'� ��:
�
. � ,,�._'�~ ,�
� ��� �tg�,���=A ��
y k r y; �
♦�� �v�..� � ��� �.
�,�.� 'Y r�,'�. .e�>� ' �,:.,�''��,r,
s a
�+�`�'�� �. � ,�` �,. � .
� �- � � `+yt���,�`� s� r �� � �„$$'�$' �'.y.
.'�� ' �';� � ��� �. � �= � �-"' �
, � �
,f � � � � ��
r:- Y"�a -����.�� � �4 "�
�,�. ;;;�� �_ , �,�_; �, '
f'�' ` Y 3 �� ��. � ��
TT � <� t `�� _ � ' s,�' ���a '
�� ' ' r �'` � �.��� � Y�,�' " .�'�"a
�� �- � � ��{} ��t� � �� e���,.. ;'��';
� . ;. r' : .� � � .�; �
��£ :,a ��; . �
: �. .���� ���� � � ,� � ��� � ',� `� �
'� � � �{� §�;: ` ° %�,. `"� �� � .z,
g,� -;a• ![; k "t � '�'�r a '�, .a,�,.� �`p. ,�.
4.� :� �� , .�,. ;�",,, k- . J. f � '�� a..� ar�« � _�`}
���,Jr � +��.s�. .. _ . .{��,`��' '��°�r '�W �'�- ��.�g
e�'���,p '��.i'�- `��g a..��' �; `:'+ _,�� '�'`�#`:� ��'a� a.t�-��� ;-�'_,
p�.,3t.`� i . �2-�i' ^L�.. . ' � $A_, ,�t,t4i. , ..
ae " � �`�.,.� �5 hA ±���F .����
� ,3�. -"x �`a
��&�°. i�' - ��. a�,r a a ���. #° � •� *<+�+"
� � �� � y� � �` �
` ��� � �� °-� �
�.mr'�� � ;,k.., r��.�, ` }., �: ��' ��
µ
: _ �� e. _ :r,� i .. '
�
� �
m , �T s,
-- , :
'} S '"t.+„t �"��
�'#��+'._ � ° , � �
�,��
"�'� �
r �� ���� k.
3"�� �� � ���i� ;
' � ��$. �� a�"`
�� � Y�4
. f
. s,t�.__ -_BR,r` .t s3� u* . =��•£ �'di�*
��e . � i, � ' � �'
. �"rj �� ��� $�� �' :s-� .i
�„t'� �,� ,�z ��� ��'w����, ��i . ,�''�t`��`
' .� �}� '����`� �� ��.cf �"��
���� � '
� 4Y ' �� "4.���S � '�y-%,° � � �
��� ' •�`� � � - °,.
'3�- �� ��,�� � � �s ', � •
�
. ,�
r= �
�; _ � : � �,.�- ��'. r,� .0 p q� *`��'°�� ` ��#t*��-.
� �
�*` ��.� ",�,"; ����� �' ,�.. � �'��,.�� ��`,,.
�� �,� �.,�`,'�.�'���� �, „�'�.� �.
� #`,r���'����`iA': sw°"` �� `�'�.; �` _ ���'�� *��ry�..
� ��rv "`
s��; -'� ��` -, �a.1 ��,
i� � F� e� .
�M_ .�� �� F� ���
.� �...-;� � � � � _
�� ,� ,�.._,�
�
r ,
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, CupeYtino
City of Cupertino Community Development Department
� �; � �.��,`���.� _��
a. � 4"� � :- si ,;
V�.#�ir r F� $ ���t 3 €a: a:�}d�':a
�� ��
# �3����
%'�� �:',�' � �i,��«��-�'��� . �+f
��:� �� � �'��
��
d' �,.
€� �.,,.��'` �F•p ar;�� � � ��
�� s�' ' ��.y� � ;-�� ;� -����"g,
��i�¢R'����,��'��. �� �� s. �
�� �:�, <,�,, 4 �*.;
f_ ,s$�. �.. �3�"�'s� �Y� �. .. . .
�� <,$� �+t s"'' ��S ,'�r <-�
,> " yr�} 'it+t,'. � r �,�c:�
� s � �
� � �&�`� . s ���'��►Y � �� s c�
a � �Y��,�^. '�.�, h,i �a ,��,, i��a, i .
� � �,.
, `.� � ?�� y�. sp�' � � <;
�-��•�,.'�' '� � �`� � �: �*
.,a`,� "'�`� -s.w�`�. �`�
'� �t�"���"`�,� t � � �
� . :� .
., ���
s�, .�" ,�°�. .«.,�.� ��� .� � a:} °� � , �. �.
t�a � s�,�. "`� �t t�'�� �€ �. a
�y€� , � "�a%��;`� j��Fya�� i`,.' '� �i�$br W��, � f
- .rt i'i„�. `�TM ,�,i��� as ....,,
� #�.�{� #� °n � �w 'b. �s,'.� .�<� a��'�j.�,-�.
�' ;,�"fa�' .+�`' . .. �� , ga� �e
R. ..k�:.. �d x„q� Y,� ��"f����`' , M� '�.'� � � ,� M +a�V
����.. y �
�� � � ,���'��� �� � '�." '�&�� ��' ,� �'��4 f r�,,� �
fi _�� °«.��'QrR^... "� ���'J� � p���.
t �,�. e* � x' ,, � �
z �.' �, ,�. , �,,, �„:.: ���! > '
� �
'�.`°'-�<���,. g� y�' `�` .'°r�' ,� +�.
.,,,> • _ . .. +Il���jr`i-► ..
� � sa
;
�"'+:�.�'.�-. .��_ �
���"
€�
�� ��.
'� ��t , .�:��
� f��S'�
�.. �� ����� ..
� '��� � � _� ,�-�'. ;�";
A .. .°� �'. 'a� � �".`�;�`�.>
i;'p 3 . �{ "fi
' ��� ..f 4�.r�r�+ ',g ' �p��o �.�..
� �� � $ � �
�_� �- a
z����� �T�? ��e ����i-'�� �y�; � '�
� � �� �� ` �x� ��5�,r� �� �s#�4.
, p� - �.� t: �
a4 �-� ��'��- .�.� ��}�P }�'���# �..
_£ � �.�
�e � §� � <.� '� ,��.� -
�_,�� �':� f ,,��`t` � r� �_����;��� ', � �
�� %,,x% �' `�� �� a.�'`'�r`�-�;. �.'�..� .
_�'-� - ¢� 6; *` � , �a* `��
���" ¢�..� �� ����, ��� ���' r b„��
��� �,_�'� � � � ,� °.
�� �
`�� �� � �� ���: � ' ��� �
�' �,�a+ad��'���� .��:. 4 .µ.� .
�i . ";,� y� a� ��`
� � �A<� � �
� _: �
�� _ � ,�, _ .` � °
� ;,a
- ...
� �� .�� .
�
� - �
� }. � �
�.,' s � __
��_r
r�► �_ � ��::..___ �
Page G8
Dati�id L. Babbv, Registered Corrsirltir2g Af�borist°
�:::, i�
� �
� � �� ���� �3�
�
�
, ;�� ;� � � �� ����� �s��� ���";
> � � �. , .
� �_.� � ���� ; � , �� .�a<
� �r�, } �., > ,� � ,
�� �� � `� �,,�_. � � � � ��� ������':��a�
����`� �,������` ;�� ''��€<�. �g�, �
�€ ':: � � ��a"�'^� ��� �'� �� `g.
°� � ' � �. �
.��r�" ���# � �° ��.� ��
£ ; r `�
. � . „�' ^�°«3 - •-` � ri�::
�� ��T�.�r,� _ �t",� �` � ,�#�,d�s �d�' �
c A � v .+R� �„�ro�_� �. � ,.���a�
'� � J' �,i���.F�� ;'�.' � • ._��';�� ;�+�.,�-y��E•�Y ��`�"� JM��t'�
r 4 � °'�.� :,� °�+ � � ,r¢ e> ��� .�
:� "���.�d'# k °�. *' �, � ° �i�.�x �.".
}�' a- �, „t fi�, .` � �,}°�''��,�y��'�' .f�.,� ,��`f*,�k���`+�v
'���� ..e9' ��q ��£ l An n'-'T�� �3 y �.a���'pi .F��.
a �` �. � �' � �'°`y #4..- �E� ����t'�"�" �'�+ a�
� €,�. ��..T ��''.`�� `�Y� ������; � ���..^�`« ' �"��. �a� � ,�*�,�]
�, . 'S� .#.� 9' ��` i�J- � �� �l- �' �i
�i]!�� �`r � ���• � �
L � g, '•�
l��i� ,. R�.� .z ��'-."u �° .. #���.
.. �� �',. ,� ~��'t19�k� � �� �:�•�
t�:��-
�,,_-
��
:y t ���.��A' ���
�s�� ���'�`�+� y. �It�� �+t!•' � . �`�..�{��'g�� .
�i"�'�.e�E �A *Y���� *;. #`r .�d � ..
*d` a�`:+����_ � ,,�° ��,� +j '"?f �
4 �� �° ��_ � � �w"�� .
�Y . ��'� �,� J(�t 1� �,- _y�t � �.�i
�`�}ttix . , , 1` �" ��Pf'f� -r.-�' ,�'�S � rv p}.°. }x '3
!� '�'-'��:a� v��� �a,y� �p '�, a y�. �..�,�`+ ��rx.�s
.� �. •�rt a �"� `f �''° � '� • `'� �� � � r� `�
�`'i�,��� �id"'� ,�±�"w Y���'i,'' �` �"` . �'i���t � ,"�' �.� `�� , '��+� ,��
li<__"R` ��"�_ .'���,r @ �#,,,�sa4 t`3 ��.a4 ¢.� �d'� i Y,., �'?
��,�..,9,�I : g�t�s'a ,:e ����E, �o `'+ti#��+e€'-a< 'W •i'� e-��a p-'r �'�,�y:`
,���e�s °��� ..,�# ��� � ,���`�,�rx� aa�` Y�' �F % '�a��'',''� . F `�.�,:'"� �:
'`,�y �� ° � ,a ,. ��'�� ���rt, "�� ,� -
$j �#`. g� � � �° '�;• ,� �'� � � �.+� ��y� �;a� � � '
"� ,"i�t� '�"��y �h .Y� � Rp �.., �i§ .. ��°i�A'��` �i��'��� �t�j.+. t� �' �1 �
��,��#�X y� `�� � �� ° .� . ,� �
�Fr� '- '.r .:s: l�� �' �. ''"
'r � A� �°fa"` t'ft �b.��� s�� ? -,k� f* 'r�`�"y�,
� ;�a ��°mw,� .��:�`'� { i_`"�,�.a.���'?� '#� . � ��� _ � A..
.�_ �� �`+� 'p' � 4}4 ��i ri ts� � ' �,ak8� ' �! a�'� • �y "�y,�"
} t 9
...�...3y i� :( ! •,� k �� �_- "�, �� $ Fh.. ��
M�F ,. , , � ,�� �` �°+� �
,.�„��:�� �,a � ,�,� `��'" ;.. `�,b
�b - ��
- ..- - - •�
'�. ���,.�"�'.�,
�'r' l� ��''�i':�;3�"�If�e'� ��... ♦ ..!w+a.�"
, � �
.
� a s
m. ........ar.`�,`, ".�, `� .
`>`.,�'��. 'S" � �" �v,�x.' �� � " �`� `:'�.. �"¢>,
�,-r�- °�'�m`^-.,a•::, {,--a:.. '``��f.>►` �
. w , . � y�. � g�.�
� `�°
����. . . .,..
4
����
� ��. �a
�
;+
� }
i �� ��� t � �
}�� � � �r, �
���:�, �+� ��i �R �
� 5� � �
F � �
� . �
� < p�� '-.-�:.
a �p�E� .. ���
� + = g�'a�
�,�¢ � �r�a� '�.o
t�, � ...� .je, .t�� . . "�..:�
Airgust 25, 2014
,��`
3�>
�� ,; �;�
, � r �"� �
f � ' �,i�"� °
� �
��A��" � � z� �� �_�.��
� �y '�='� �
� ��, ��
� ���g�s°€�' �s
��, _� y �4° m�
��� �, � a � �� _„,
�,�- ,*�'' a!�'f �'f- *i�'. ,� r..-:t
�' ' dr,.�� � "*' r-�' '�y.
� w l�
��°s `r,� � , ,g��Y"
F F ,�.�
�� �` ',� ��`�
� � � # �� ^°�T.
� l� ,�` �.� Iz.
.ry �.. . .: . .
�, �� �y .`�.`� ,
.. ..._,.:�Y_ _._��A ,.
� ���
�:�
�� �
� �
�'. � � ��r .,�
� .
��P � '
�'� $�' ��� �� � �'� � `, ���:
_ q�� `3 a4�"' F �`� �
,���sl�' � 'yy,i j.tEF.. f t �T .s
-:h
� �"�.� ... �, . °�� �*�$> ��,�`. �✓
� `� ,a �.,� ;,
_'�,� ���, m �'�' .�. +`_',K �'{°
�e��� � ��,«� ��.r, ��..
e },� '�,�� tie.-sa t _' �'-.`�.
�, "' �" .�
" ��e* � �' , �
� �o , > a—` :.�'� �`!
� �� � ��W�`:�
� "�: ` s
.�s,a'� �;�; �, �. �.� � ���i
��� �� -�+
� q p'�����'��'i� 2�a
���� ��f�� �. .
� ,"� � '�-
.�`,� ^*��'�•���. �r �,
� �".
•� �-_ �c�s3;
�';
� __
s�Y g
� �
� '>:�y. �4g� ,a.�'�"R �
���"� .�s
�y` ��( � A.�� �,��
�
�..
��',�R.�� �'� �
�°° o,�►°�. t•�.�
� ,w� �s
.� Y
8 .
� ,-,..st;�. w..,....c,�
�
'4 ° � ., ..�.�'Y�.
��'
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page C-9
City of Czrpertino Community Development Department
David L.Babby,Registered Consulting Arborist° August 25, 2014
���' : "�'�
���� �� � � �:� ..
�. � � � , ��_� .
���s � : �� 4
,. ,�,... -� �,�, �
.1-,�a �- .,� s_; . .
x Y 9�'
�, ��,-���� _ �
'�, �� �r ��e :
—��`� t „�>#�� �±�_ � ;4,
� � � J��:. .,'�_
<- � ���� �� � � 8Y �
��# �� „�}� ;�,� �
s� '=' . � .. �^� � ��p• :+ �`"a�s�•
k
���+��r� �*.'�� �9 �+� �+�� � ��..14
S4�'�� .., W;. r : �?,.,
R`" }�;F i�` +� '�� y��}�'
;�,� . +.��`w'..' _ 3wi,e • i y�„"'�,Y .
����� � . .
� ,'� t{�`��,'_ � �,��
�'��".���, � ,� � � �,�
`�:��.:`�`�`' °��� � �'��
�
��!"5 �, t t ?�,3 , . :
� �� +� .. . � . . ��
� ��"'a_,.✓' �';�§ -t��, �
,t. „���,���j � � � � ` `�°
t' ,� �� � � � �,�� '
�,�_<. � . '� ` `- � ��
-=-� ��A����. �a � ,, u , � ��;�. �
�T .�' 'B'"'` # ,` ';` 4� � �'��'�`v�� �� . °�;r` a
�7 , J' ?g
��� - _t � �; � � !*_a
�g�'.6i` `+u-�; �° - � :�'� i�� ,. ;� �< .
V�. YAi�,a� . �`�,'"ti f Sb��o�� �.� �t��. .�..�..
'f m''� +.� � � 4. , q �.p� :�� "e .
���t`���=#' � '�.�°* .��: � � � ,,� � � �R- ~�
� '�` �_ � �'"�3'�>. �t�_ - ;�. ��.� °�
-j�' T�, `$z. y ��"� �" ,� � `��as e. ��F y����y�.
�• r . $`, . s �a ..j�S` 6f. '.'�qc'A .��-
'�"g' � � ��, �
� ,
�' _ '+�- r ���., , � � �,�� & "` �°'��° � ���` �'
� ' � g
�yi ,. .1���'..# ..:���~ u�� .�� �'�'- � `��� i�s���.. ^'�����a Ya.
�� ��q�s .�, � .� fr..-.� ,�. �.' s "1 � & a9�"`�•��Y..�:
�� �e �P F..'� ��•��� �i+�� �Y�". �",�` ��IR
,�'`.. �-F�a �` ! a��. �� .� i. ��4:: ai.,' ""..
��:�° . �ss`K°' .� #F A�n,a ' ' .. y... �, ".a
.. ...;4sw�� Fw� ���N � ra�" .�t� � }r t� �` � w�` �d, �,y�.
,��� 's: .Y� �:"�,"�� `� '��v���s� � �,fi,� '�� .
�.- �. FN� �� 4�^�" " ;'� � .
�"� 4$���,�� '*" g, ����kr °�w +�x�j�'y';8 ig, ,7
�9 � � � , + a� •r �
."G ..x�'�j "'"„ �'£k _` i ��" , ��'"�,, �' �.4 r .��.
� �
:��:&b tqmma-�... .- _ . - . ,.
��..a,...,_=. �°"'°.,'".. .... ,� �ya;. 11 . .
..,._.�`,„.As�' *'.
� ...�,�` j..�-- �u� ... � .... . . w._..
�
�,...,. --,.._,.... .. . ...�..ra.ti�w
�
�� ��� �
� °��-?g���a�. ����� _
.' �"�� . ' � >
;a r '
", �� ��y�� . , ...�e .�f �a��,�$
�° � ���� �. ,. �
,
������.: f�� �� �.�' £ 3�s, �i;Y� �" � �y`�.
t �'� �� � ��", _.�����r
� �� s:�. 3 � � �"'��� k� � �.r
��, ` � �� ,�..�' � � �# �° ���� � � ;_.
'�,�`' '+itr 'i� s�>`�$4�:.r ,� .� F�� * ���_ � ��,Y. �`
.�� '�, , ,,�.,� �
'�,��'� �.'� ,� . °����"�� ��p� .,� ��'`�',�-,�,
� s *� "��� .�,` s' 'i� '` �`_;��� �> >�, `Y"
��,� .n$° ,, "" ,��$���'g'���}��£��� � � °����,��. .�
` � �� tl�F.�nz������-�° s�'�� ��,� ,- �
� � ��°�, �; ' �� �,fH �r��`aw�. ��a�� as,s�.` y �<�.i+:
$ �. � ,5�t,n P' ��Z� �� 4
t�'�.II;��€:, >.o�' ,�a P ���°+.;. ��^�; ,! ��� �'4'-5
' % a� '�' a�, -.��. �.' � Yg #�
r- �z '�.e � �`�£�' V�g' A g,''��` `�,�ar ; .. , ',rt..
�� .:�#';� :�:�,�:���..rtd�`�a '�':�i}. �s„�r'r..i`�fiie�...,.. ,I�z .:$4�'�:.. >: . ae: 'Y,+:�• . ..'�i2�1
�r -����• :
� �� :y S i.y.. ���
_� � ,�.°�.-,. ,:::�
���'� ���' ���''"' ,��� �
.s., �: �.:j�s��
. ys..,.i..�� � �, „i�,,.*.w ,
:
. - ,���`�`�,� ..m... °'..,.._.
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page G10
City of Cupertino Community Developrrient Department
Davicl L. Babbv, Register�ed Consulting Arborist° August 25, 2014
� ��� � �r��._,r�� -� �
���� �
� � ��
���-������ e ���
$ , t� p �
���a� ° ��� ��.�� ��,�
.'� � • .� �'�,�
�
�� � � '`.��
.�. �
�` � �� �`�� ��� ����
�� , _ �.�+ �� � �� °� ,�
x� ����.� `K � .�. �' <a��-
,� �°� `��•�� ,;;� �t' ��
s •r.
,� � � � �a ,�, :�� . � x- -� � � �`.���
�a sr =`'��' � ` i�'� � ,����'�
�r � : i�.,�'�`� ,�;� ��„ ,�, c�� . . n fi°
�s '�§ 8��.6%� wt �2 1f.d� r'S �.
@� . �'� ,�� � a �i ��V�s#� t`�; =� .._,�` ,
� �n�.: a#� .� . .. -a<r � ��..
�-�' .. � � '��� ;� � � � � �; �� �.,a ��.,��,
� .. . �"�< ,�,,£4����.-s� . ���•�� a��'�'� „r�p `����.
.
,
,r , < «
�,
y
;� � ,�� .��� � �' ..,�a.. �.
� .a�z� �: ''� � a � � � ��
��� a �.�"� °� g'T� "�; t �'
"��'�f ii.�. Y � . �t .� .y\�' „p.
�.����� ���' �. a"`�"^`�d ��� u�
. . , n� �, . ^�
. �.
__ � ���n
Hyatt House Hotel at Vallco Park, Cupertino Page C-11
City of Cirpe�tzno Community Development Depaf�tment
• •
or a i iona
.
n orma ion
.
ee i e :
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ . _