TR-2014-31b OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE•CUPERTINO,CA 95014-3255
C U P E RT 1 N O (408)777-3308•FAX(408)777-3333•planningCa�cupertino.org
August 6, 2014
Andersori s Tree Care
Attn: Doug Anderson
P.O. Box 2-B
San Jose, Ca. 95109
SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT ACTION LETTER- Application TR-201431
This letter confirms the decision of the Director of Community Development, given on August 8
2014, approving a tree removal permit to allow the removal and replacement of two Blue Atlas
Cedar trees with a diameter of 20" and 21" at a quasi-public building (Cupertino Health Center),
located at 22590 Voss Avenue. The application to remove the trees is approved with the following
conditions:
1. APPROVED PROTECT
This approval is based on the arborist peer report prepared by Michael Bench (#WE1897A),
dated July 10, 2014, consisting of 2 pages and an arborist report prepared by Doug Anderson
(#WE 1061), dated May 14, consisting of 6 pages including a a tree removal and tree
replacement site plan, except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution.
2. TREE REPLACEMENTS
The applicant is required to plant four (4) 24-inch box replacement trees in accordance with the
Protected Tree Ordinance and approved tree replacement plan. Modifications to the tree
species and location may be made to the approved replacement plan pending staff approval.
The replacement trees shall be planted within 30 days of the effective approval date of this tree
removal permit.
3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of
such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are
hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees,
dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the
requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
Staff has made the findings necessary to grant the tree removal permit in accordance with
Section 14.18.180 of the Protected Trees Ordinance.
Sincerely,
Gian Martire
Assistant Planner
City of Cupertino
CC: Pleasant View Associates,Attn:Steven Dunton,2985 W.Dear Field Ct.,Eagle Id 83616
Cupertino Health Center,Attn:Bradley Burgoyne,22590 Voss Ave,Cupertino Ca 95014
�'"��"'��
�
\,,,- Michael L.Bench ���,������L ��,���,L_3�
� � Consulting Arborist —�• .:_.. _.7__.. .:.»,,.....,._,
� (831) 594-5151 '' '
�°`..-�,,,,, v_.�.�._, '� -i� _ _
�� 7327 Langley Canyon Road �
��� Prunedale,California 93907 C'�, ,
v[�!'1 i;:;�.i�'�;
` �` _.._...�._, _ �.
--+� -�,� .., .,_ _ _ _
A Review of the Request to Remove Cedar Trees
Cupertino Health Center
22590 Voss Avenue
Cupertino, California
Assignment
I was asked by Gian Paolo Martire, Assistant Planner, City of Cupertino, to
prepal-e a peer review of the request to remove two inature cedar trees at the
Cupertino Health Center, 22590 Voss Avenue, Cupertino, California.
An evaluation of the trees and their surrounds had been prepared by Mr. Doug
Anderson, Certified Arborist, in a report dated 5-15-14.
Observations
I visited the site on July 10, 2014.
The report prepared by Mr. Anderson is essentially accurate, with the exception that the
two trees arBlue Atlas cedars (Cedrus atlantica `Glauca') not Deodar cedars (Cedrus
deodara). One of these is less blue in color and more green than the other, which is a
result of seedling variation, as cedars are grown from seed. For this reason, there can be
considerable variation between individual trees. The leaf or needle length is the
distinctive difference between Blue Atlas cedars and Deodar cedars.
The two subject cedar trees are in good condition.
To my knowledge, there is no significant difference between the growth and cultural
characteristics between Blue Atlas cedar and Deodar cedar.
These trees had severely buckled the surrounding concrete, which has been removed.
Mr. Bradley Burgoyne, Administrator, stated that the Department of Health stopped the
usage of this courtyard because the heaved concrete was a significant hazard.
Mr. Burgoyne expressed concern about possible damage to the footing of the building. I
did not see any damage to the footing, nor would I expect any given the location of the
trees in relation to the building for a very long time.
Prepared by Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arborist Observations July 10, 2014 1
22590 Voss Avenue
Cupertino, California
The interior courtyard, in which these two trees exist, is a usable space and a needed
space for the provision of services by the center. Mr. Burgoyne plans to replace the
surface with concrete or pavers to restore the usable space.
This construction to restore the durable surface would require significant root looses to
both trees, possibly rendering them unstable and hazardous.
Because of the elevations of the existing soil in relation to the building, it does not appear
that it would be feasible to replace the durable surface with decking, which can typically
be constructed without causing significant root damage. However, decking of the
synthetic composite materials installed on the soil surface inay be a feasible option.
Another alternative may be the installation of artificial turf or a sport court material. In
this case, approximately 2-3 inches of course sand may be used to create a more"level"
surface.
These tree provide very effective shade for much of the courtyard area.
Recommendations
1. I suggest that the alternative materials be considered and explored prior to the
removal of these trees. It appears that the majority of the courtyard could be a
usable space without sacrificing safety. The addition of a layer of course sand and
the possibility of shaving the top 30% of an individual root may make this option
completely workable.
2. In the event that none of the alternative materials would be feasible, I would
support the removal and replacement of these two subject Blue atlas cedar trees.
Respectfully submitted,
r-•-----,� e�_
Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arborist
International Society of Arboriculture Certification#WE 1897A
American Society of Consulting Arborists Member
Prepared by Michael L. Bench, Consulting Arborist Observations July 10, 2014 2
. ._ �� ��� On 73r�e ��„
e�-
o �i m
. ' � . � �' . cR �rEo
. , `�-� .
�'e 8r�
S►p�c�a��sts, Tnc. � � o
P.O.�ooc 28�Sen Jo�e,CJI�.f10��00UQ ,r e� � y
Te!'��06M 2'2�TF+�E($��,'j�Fa�c(�1281-$733�!�C#�3'06f 71 � �'��� ��
3�' .iFiae:3;it.:!"- :dt?. :�'.T
^� CONFIDENCE
Bradley Burgoyne a�������L .
Cupertino Health Center - �-�- •-°��y-�-�?-� -
22590 Voss Ave ' ' '
Cupertino, Ca. 95014 ��- � �'���
c�',..�.. : ,'l��
Re: Rear court ard �
Y
Dear Bradley,
At your request, I have visited your property to evaluate the condition of the Palm tree
referenced above. This letter will serve to summarize my observations and recommendations.
Summary:
There are two Deodora Cedar located in a 6 foot by 12 foot planter in the rear internal courtyard.
The cement surrounding the courtyard has been damaged by the tree roots and has since been
demolished.
The trees are too large for this location and should be removed and replaced.
Assignment:
I have been asked to write a report supporting a tree removal permit application from the City of
Cupertino.
Limits of the Assignment:
All observations were made from the ground. No root collar excavations were performed.
Purpose & Use of the Report:
This report will be used to support a tree removal permit application from the City of Cupertino.
Observations:
These two trees are in a 6X 12 foot planter in an interior courtyard. The courtyard is 33 feet by 33
feet square.
Prepared by Doug Anderson for Bradley Burgoyne 5-15-14 Page 1
. The trees are 62 inches an� -� inches in circumference measured at inches above grade,
respectively. Canopy dim�nsions measure approximately 50 feet hign and 60 foot spread.
Discussion:
Roots should account for approximately 1/3 of the total biomass of a tree. Root functions include
water and nutrient uptake, carbohydrate storage, tree anchorage, and production of gibberellins
(a hormone that promotes canopy growth).
The root plate, or zone of rapid taper consists of the primary structural roots extending out from
the trunk. Roots are intended to branch frequently, tapering in diameter. The root plate is the
tree's primary support system during wind and weight loading.
The size of the root plate is generally considered to be 3 to 6 times the trunk diameter measure at
breast height, or 4.5 feet above the ground, diameter at breast height(DBH).
These trees have a diameter of 19.75 and 21.3 inches, respectively. Normal root plate radius for
these trees should be from 66 inches (5.5 feet) to 132 inches (11 feet).
When considering root pruning in conjunction with development or improvement projects it is
important to have a sense of where root pruning should occur to minimize damage to tree health
and anchorage. The size of the roots to be severed is also an important consideration.
The Critical Root Zone(CRZ) has been identified as a 12 inch radius for every inch of trunk
diameter. To optimize tree health, no soil disturbance, grading, root pruning, or equipment
operation should occur within this area.
The Interior Critical Root Zone(ICRZ) halves this measurement. Root pruning may take place
in the outer half of the CRZ but more after care is required. Tree health will be impacted. Loss of
more than 50% of the root crown often results in tree mortality.
Depending on the size of the roots severed, tree stability may be affected.
The trees are located in the corner of the planter. There is not enough room for normal root plate
expansion.
Root pruning in areas to allow the original planter bed to be re-installed will affect tree
anchorage as it will have to occur within the ICRZ.
Conclusions:
1) Both the Critical Root Zone and the Interior Critical Root zone lies outside the
dimensions of the courtyard itself.
2) The trees are located in the corner of the planter. There is not enough room for normal
root plate expansion.
3) Root pruning in areas to allow the original planter bed to be re-installed will affect tree
anchorage as it will have to occur within the ICRZ.
Prepared by Doug Anderson for Bradley Burgoyne 5-15-14 Page 2
_ 4) Root growth is ma) ;the footing dangerous for the elderly �idents. There is no way to
engage in root prun`t��g to allow for concrete replacement without effecting tree
anchorage. The amount of the roots to be lost will have an adverse effect on tree health.
Recommendations:
1) There is no room to safely root prune these trees to make the area safe for the residents.
2) Remove these trees and replace them elsewhere on the property.
Site Map:
33 feet
1
7 feet
12 feet
� �— Tree A
6 feet
� �— Tree B
33 feet
SupportinE Photograph's:
Prepared by Doug Anderson for Bradley Burgoyne 5-15-14 Page 3
. � . � w`t�' ��t -� i, �' a,__ +� ?14 ��
�-�. �. t' ` ,�• #' �jp�,,�=:�„ _ -e;��� �,, _''.%R_ ,J�.
:�� � .� M �. � . .,;
� � °�� - ��.'������ � ,i�- ,, --�
. � �, .
�- .
� ° - a .
�� �,-�.,_, „��. . - �.�: �� +�. � � #
, . ;
_ � ��,'�W � _ �� ,
_ „
>P 4
•, � _:. � . ���� � � �d�r" - �-�
� � �� _
�+s. _ a --_ � - ..� . "r _ , n't
e► _ , <,'" �� � " � y ,�+
� ` � �,,y
' r T .t
��z�++� bi-L.
` ' �
�€:�� ��', :� s '�I!
� . .. . �"3� h:. u�� ' �
T
t
..z. a" .r
r � �
rs+F w �
.
<,
� � ' . � °` ...� F ..
� �,��,_,..,.• a ....
�, . � , . ... . .
.,:F � s� � . tt. �.. �- ,..
t;� � �' � �� � $
� ',u. # ,'"` . r<
, � '� , �,,a� �
�: 'q �. � .��
��
"�� �,�, _�` �A .;� .
r-
.,� �. � `�°*� �.' ,.,4���` :
� � .�
.
�. � � w- x e. ,..:�.,.._�,
.. ,
- � �
�
, .� � ,,� `
� _� -�,�. ...„ ,�, . a'� �,�r: '"�` „� � �,,� ;�-� . �"',�R''«.a.
�,, �y�-��-.. ' � �� � ..�,_ ':"'
� ,> w
,M �,� .,
, � , A� � _.
.., � "��
. � � . � _ <_�,
� ... � �. , ., _ ,� �.
. n. . � � � •
�. � .�� „__ � �� �
� - .��
. , � � '�
,
._. ,� - ,�
.� ��
�
� .�, . .
,
„� ���, ������ � Y , , � .
; �^� r.
. • , �%� . - " ���"
�. , .p
,� ; . � �, . . � , . ,�w��� �.
��
a , . « . , ,. , . ..� -.. �� . , ,
� - ,. .,.:- ,� ,���.
. �
„ ti o.
_ "�'
. m
F ��
,
� P- �°' , ,�; �. �� .:, -
,. . p. �,
_ , „ -,r.,� . . x, .
.., ..._ :: , (��
-�� ���� � A��'`¢ . ' ����J)n'
� A .
. .n s.., ,yr :.
y
, . �� '�+Vww�- '�`+
,.rL+r.�... �E �"�l ��
����"'i A . . �V d, ��r. ���•4 .����fw�.� ���y .
� " #i� �.ai�°'" � .n ��'�... ������ � '� �A � �Y'..�T
v
.
a
i...
. � �
� �a, , . .- - '�'�r��"4" ^���,,;'�"�,?i�`- �► � „
_. M._� =h _ � b .' _
��` ,, .r •„�"�F�+" ,. s'�.s�_ �tir,.�w. �
� ... r:� �. ��. �`s'r's. �`. .. _ '.. �s - . ,..
. ,q �� ,� . ..
.� •'_� . r`�,�� " .4 � . +- ���
.� + . .�.�e� « ... "� ' ` .. � �^re',
�� °-:i�:�. . . ��r" ,�i'"° ..,r^^ ��s�^. :T� �'".� � '�"�.
�,.„�„�W,�' � � . �,.-'. � •
����+�,.� r'�-i�•rF�a�R+�� � �A„ ��� � ..
e� � �
.* '
�.,- .,, . m � ,.
.. . . . ,@.. ,��,� +. �y_,. �� }, ��N'C- ,y�,ka,.�.,,� � . . .
- r a�P , �� ,. ,. {'A..+ � � �k rcg�.;.� .. � # �'
�'" � � �
� �
��. .t . „�,�„ a .. > s,.u �
��������t"'" �.' ��: ,� ..` , . ���"� ��* � � °
'�,,�F�. . � '�C'r�. ,�a���x , - ' �� °� , .���;'. 'P�_ s A'"
. �,-c� +��, - .
� � ��1 �. i�i ��`s � � +� i
/' Y'� •sN� '
�
...'r"aF"'G"
.� � �' �F ?.'r�.-'^ 1
�-- ; } • _-_ �
. �,,. ���� .�`,� �C � ��.�'�!` 3
. ,
� , ,.
��,�� " "`�, - ' `{::�� .�. �;�,� : .,�
<.
. , ._ .
"'�, n."�r 1�,. `' �.. :w � , s:-a
iK'� Yyir,. a_�. ..'.-t-. . Y " " i.. 4 x r ,� -�r ,
. �. �
�' '�r. : � . �:��,•�\ R
�
., . �.,,j. ' .� 3
�?
�� ,�
:,
� �� ,i .,<�,. 4, ` . ..i ..„� _„�-�---`
,..�e � '�.`, 4• . t .,>
. �", 'y= .r '4. �;� w
, �.
..� �, , .. . �
� =� 4 �,°''v�
,�.� _, � ,�. --= ��
a � .�
_. . .� _�._ '
.
, `��-: .�.. _ , , _
, ,� .
� �r
� ��`�'`
, r � �
,�� ��;� �' � � �. '"
��� , �, '• �� M
3#y� � � ���� .�r�,
�' �' � _
�, � j ` �I� .�" ". ';,;,
�; � � F� 4r �1
.t ., -� —,_ .'� ... -�-.r....a��n� � . � . ?fRn,
,.�
,.. �
�4
�
.�, .� _ �. . .;;
..
., :, --�-� �y, �� ,,��"• K � � -
* � ,»
{ �. .. .�s°F .�,a,,,, . .� .•k« � ,
.�
�,� > � ,•,� �, �F..
a�
, x,. �'y ' k, � ,�M�
,
�,.�` a�` ���.,�`*
� ^g�.
.. .. _
`��
�
":,.:., `��
a.�w
,"' 'e e•`,��� "` x ..
-...x
,�,"�e ' •�:� >.
.��. ,
:�:
���",; ,
- �:a�" ��n
Prepared by Doug Anderson for Bradley Burgoyne 5-15-14 Page 4
�� � `;' �
�W � ';�- �
�. �
ik �.�
�`"sS -� JI-..,, 4 �k? �
�t 'i
e,0: ! ��#' ..esy...
1 �
4 y,'.��'A}, .°��'�`�--_..�s ....
�� U�
,���t�" ` �� Y:_,��,: � `,� �
, ,
. ,
� s�,�� •,,.�z�r� ��` � �� , � �
, ,
M �. ,
. 1 '�`���� �', � ,, ��.,_ f , ..`' .� . �� .>
�•�. o. � .a..ri .{. .. ' .... .,1�i �,S,n�:, ��� .Y��x'�s:.
� ' iR..� '!�Y '�� �k.W . . .
,� .i y�,�16 . , t �• y��! ��.�. �� S.:� � .N,.r�6 �e'% .,�<.�sYw.r.,.. ���r � °'"��` -�. � e�
"� . �� ,.,: � x � yr' ,.r�»' -+�, . s �a ,#g�,�.�i wt".,x,a, .»'`�»,a� rww .,�
�t'�' � �.. ..
. - . . �a i ,i�„ t ?a �� -o-' wd'
:c �.
.� � `"� ,� .4,�°i"'� ,, ti� . .,,,� ��^
ti
� � R �°�` e: � �: � �� ._s �„��..
., �'��r � `' � Y , `,� aY��,., � t �"a�y�e� � ,,.
'"�',y� y," �a '';�"�+a Y"� � . ,. .^ ^��,�? �a' �w+ ',�� �' , ,r q�g�.� g>,. 'i� s.
��+�,�� �°'�r�.��"°�^�'_..::..�" x�.�,�,✓�.. .,��.,,��+ : .9 .' �„ "`� '<;;,..':. .�-,..��+i.� ..j��`��aw x '•-� a'C"h A •^"�,•,p-...
„ � ., �
R��'.���� N. - *r-,.� `� .. „�e�.,,, ` , .•'''� . . . �� . " �+, �' ��'+P�s ' "Y.��
+ �
,
.
�'' aw ' j''� � a!''�-•y�. '
.� +i��•,r �4. ,-, "- ' '�r'k wa' '�° .k.+k.,, � .,..✓,� �M .,. .. � a�` y��, � r '
�
r ° ,
�r�'',�"� �� � ` �� �:,��i� - �,' ' � � � m. < ���-��� ����;:�•
- .
- �,. .
,
, �-
;�,� � .;�a x�,-� ;�� :�,..�• �. , ,..�.,� �,� ? .
,
.w i� . A
�`iyl�t_ _�' rs�,°`� =x.�« ,tw,; "� .w' K '� i .�, v �,,, �'��`� - ' K
, �
� "
. ��r#.'�;4 .�, .4, �. ^....,�r r°� � . '��,+*.`= � .`.��' " . � s ,. ,. � .E"ua•d M ..�=�.R'�`�"
� '
Q .��.�� � �.. h
' � � s`�"
�
, �t;;.
�
. » .a�-�. . .� �t'�r„
r,
� . ,. : �.� ,��
�'
� 4 � ,,
es. .-
� �,�
. .� :. .. . . �r, ,
�+ r
s�
• y g s-✓� 'MAP�z�9+i; �. �a.:' ij' ��A,e �"�
. ' .t "
.
, � . �'r�. - _
a %�. *
t � 3�„ry ��,+ � "-d .
.9�� � �S ��� !� i •t � 3Mw
.
. k�(.
; •• yT
, .L}
' p� .�. . :..� � g.
* a
„"�+"' .`
-g�,.^" � ° .�'� �'+^� �..�^� _ . `„�1` e 5
"
.
�;� ,,dM�_�"" 6 "'4... :a � . " ♦..�m„j�"'iy.yt.-��° '�'
� M
� w, , .G
,
� ._, .
g�. w � ,;Y �, . ... , ys'.�� '��
�..
E�R`'�,.. '"k. �.' ',;<:,. . . j:'� ,: �i'`" '�,� "y"" - 3-t
�,�,,GIT ,�� ,r' p��� > �«,5�, ^' A:� +li`.• ' ♦ ;�`,E�si�
�,( . , .. . Rd . .. .t f� ;„ ,
.
_ �
� ��y � �� � � � rr f� ���.
� , . .+^6 .. . ,.
� �^<;,y�, � � ,•s ,� .,
�* .r��•^�? �d�' � �� :.��j � , �
_ �+������.!k` 'rr,A,'t"` `y �I ! �`" [`�'� �. , `"� � >�i .�'�`�. °e'- � ��� -
.
,�'�,,'� .: . �,`.�jr�3's.. , .$�,� �� t � J r r � s..�,�t� �'a.
+r ,,"�" � ��" . �_ '�� �T k.. ��,'� �f„ .?",1 a:.y"�'i�.�'Y""
( • �
�y / ♦ .. .. � i .. „� �'' ��.$�
x ,y' a '�, ,�Q' � "'(c� �:: <f.� .. .. _ yl �ti
��/"�+�} •� ,�.rt'+��4 : � �� ��, �' # �� ��w�` $+'T "'�R,A' �w
f '. . :: _ °�i,
�. ., . , .:. .
a«��`"
� aaf� � '�'.� ... :,'".�`"f , - �' "1'�' �s a >vg .� , ^'Y'tn�`�s��r e"� p"
� ��..' R.r` . � ... `r �� � 14'" a- � �^ `"iM'+ },�
.
.. : � �� . „ �,. , ,'_ �� ".'
:
. ..
- . ,� t ., �{'
". �i.�� ,e,.,. � -,, � �&� ��aM '�i� "�..5. •�`^F � `t
, ., " ..� ,_ ..
� - � '
. �
..�"-l�.•` .r», � .� .:r' M e ._, � ` # F., �x '�'r m �� .�.�'�w.•�`�[:c�`�"�.r��'��w� ���
Glossary
Critical Root Zone: An area of root crown determined to be the minimal area in which no root pruning
or land development shall occur. This varies by tree species, relative age, and individual vigor.
DBH: Tree diameter measured at 54 inches above grade
Gibberellins: Plant hormones that regulate plant processes such as stem elongation
Root Crown: The whole of the root mass below ground
Root crown excavation: is the process of removing the dirt from around the trunk to inspect the base of
the tree
Root Plate or Zone of Rapid Taper: Mass of primary structural roots extending from the trunk
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
l. Any legal description provided to the consultant/appraiser is assumed to be correct. Any titles and
ownerships to any property are assumed to be good and marketable. No responsibility is assumed
for matters legal in character. Any and all property is appraised or evaluated as though free and
clear, under responsible ownership and competent managemcnt.
2. It is assumed that any property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes, or
other government regulations.
Prepared by Doug Anderson for Bradley Burgoyne 5-15-14 Page 5
. 3. Care has been taken �btain all information from reliable sourcF �ll data has been verified
insofar as possible; h,,,vever the consultant/appraiser can neither gaarantee nor be responsible for
the accuracy of information provided by others.
4. The consultant/appraiser shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of
this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an
additional fee for such services as described in the fee schedule and contract of engagement.
5. Loss, alteration, or reproduction of any part of this report invalidates the entire report.
6. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any
purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed, without the prior expressed written
or verbal consent of the consultant/appraiser.
7. Neither all nor any part of this report,nor any copy thereof, shall be conveyed by anyone,
including the client,to the public through advertising,public relations, news, sales or other
media, without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant/appraiser
particularly as to value conclusions, identity of the consultant/appraiser, or any reference to any
professional society or initialed designation conferred upon the consultant/appraiser as stated in
his qualification.
8. This report and the values expressed herein represent the opinion of the consuldappraiser, and the
consult/appraiser's fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value, a
stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent event,nor upon any finding to be reported.
9. Sketches, diagrams, graphs, and photographs in this report, being intended as visual aids, are not
necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys.
10. Unless expressed otherwise: 1) information in this report covers only those items that were
examined and reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection; and 2) the inspection
is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection, excavation,probing, or
coring. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of
the plants or property in question may not arise in future.
�
Resp �'tfully submitt d ;'
---,
Doug
Doug Anderson, President
Anderson's Tree Care Specialists, Inc. �{��,n,��
A TCIA Accredited Company "
ISA Certified Arborist#1061WE � '� � � z���Q.�
TRAQ Qualified ' '�"
QAL# 100328 ` S T lalh�[nc, � �' 1►� �
P� �, .
TCIA CTSP#01321 t w���r-«
California State Contractors License#705171
Office: 408 226-8733
Cell: 408 206-2722
www.andersonstreecare.com
Prepared by Doug Anderson for Bradley Burgoyne 5-15-14 Page 6