The URL can be used to link to this page

DIR-2013-28b CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308 To: Mayor and City Council members Chairman and Planning Commissioners 'J .-- From: Gary Chao, Assistant Director of Community Development�: �� Prepared by: Colin Jung, Associate Planner, Planning Division Date: June 18, 2014 Subject: Director's Minor Modification (DIR-2013-28) to improve the appearance and provide for the continued operation of a personal wireless service facility (tree pole) and associated equipment located at 10121 Miller Avenue. Chapter 19.164 of the Cupertino Municipal Code allows for administrative approval of minor changes in a project. The Director reports his decision to the City Council and Planning Commission in time to allow an appeal of the decision within fourteen calendar days. DISCUSSION Proposed Modifications The applicant, Ginbar Ketema representing T-Mobile/Crown Castle, proposes to renew a previous approval of a personal wireless service facility and enhance its appearance by installing new leaf socks (over existing panel antennas), replacing the branches with more realistically colored needles, and filling in the gap on the lower two rows of branches to more seamlessly integrate these branches into the base of the tree. No new panel antennas or changes to the associated equipment are proposed. Pro�ect Data � • General Plan Desi nation Commercial/Office/Residential Zoning Designation [P(CG,Res)] Planned General Commercial/Residential Design Guidelines N/A Lot Size 34,412 s .ft. (0.79 acre) Existing use Office Buildin &Personal Wireless Service Facili � � General Plan Yes Zoning Yes Le al Non-Conformin (Less than 75'Setback to Residentiall Zoned Pro rties) DIR-2013-28 10121 Miller Avenue 2 1 • Environmental Assessment Cate oricall Exem t(Section 15301) Location The subject project site is located at 10121 Miller Avenue, bounded by Richwood Drive to the north, Miller Avenue to the east, and residential uses to the south and west. .:.. �L:" . �� ' - . ��. � � \� ;. � � • _( �—t,_ ,j � .�,�\�. � � �.I • , �. _ � !.. ,,:._. ;y� ... ` • �; ' �� ..� _�;"�° y� r�• �` `�""..,; � „�L� � �� - �� +Il�� '4 ir � w 4� �..__.�_ '� y�,. -��A •'E�� . .,_ .�:` � � �� y . • � .. . ��Y_ .Y{�L'6.. � , �� 3 � y ♦ , `�� , . � �r��'�� .�=M� k � L,�� ti 1. �. ✓.�q}�`i. �_.... I •• � .. . , '�` `.�� . R.ae Se,S w�;^ i _ J� ,� w{''l!i�!�i}1C'�R7"A'� � J, � � , � .� - '1 � s� � �.� �, f �ro _ � � •�'.� � s , ,,,�„f .�� a � :�' � ,___ ._._._ �' „} � ` �� . . . s^ `�'� i°"�, <��°+,i , � ' " ' -<.r�� ` r�'T'Ya. ='f.y ' y�,�l`\' � � � .. � 'R;�.` ' t `� �• !�;'`� �� r " * . ,�'�,in ti ''•� ' •j, ;�► � ` � � 4�;; . �� ' -,ia� ' � � � .� ' � �' 7 !'�'� � , L � '� r�j �, ti,_ ��* -:'! I � ,� �;' . �� i�: �� , 4 x a��ry� '1 �.� " � +� �:�, ��; .� _ �r� ;+�.� � `�' , ' � _ . ,~=; �: � � q� �.� /�, h,; ' , x�F�� " � �P, �e w,,. .��.. 4 ,�' �$ . � . A ♦,.� � E; ■�, . .,,,.;'. �� . � . .. - • �'�. _� ~w�a . '��'ve .. �� t: ,��te . •r� y^ 1 ,,_ , .°��!� . �, s:- � �.. � . u��, v� ��:r.�y r+Y ��: �� .� .. m. �+�. . , -- �s. � . �' �,� .y� + . Xi3/ 3 ti. � y pN. 3 , � r>_�_ ^i � . , . . .,... ., _ . � - � +� x �;;� �s tY"4'W'r� a ^ 3�,'�._. � , _� . nw,-;,�,;�:.,.ow ,. � ' �,w°r��'cu + Y-. :�,. �i:4.��. � "° r`1 '3,,;. .�'�.*.,�,�� / a . � �° w� p� a� � �'�a �, �a'�.'t y . ,..- ,. . � - �1�1�� t '1,- --��'`+r" \ . ��e".. �.F �2Y+�°e�`si�'"i�9z' �'y�.d� .. �.1 �'T�. � �� n oa t, f � �t6 �, �a. . ,w� �� 1 "4� � � � r <,r� � � ^� , C_r.r 1 ��"'. ,-�• � � '�''.'! 1 �r •_ L _ _ � �� / �� , ,.� ,. ,v�,.��!�"� ,� ��` -� ' -« Background The prior application, DIR-2002-04, had granted the facility approval for five (5) years and expired February 24, 2008. As a condition of approval, the facility could be renewed pending a review of the technology to determine if the visual impact of the equipment could be further minimized. Pursuant to this condition, staff conducted a site visit and determined that the visual impact of the equipment could be further minimized by installation of needle socks that fully wrap the antennas (the existing condition only covers the face), replacing the needled branches with ones that are more realistically colored, and by more seamlessly integrating the lower two rows of branches with the base of the tree. Furthermore, as conditioned, exposed electrical wires and units installed on the tree that are not covered in needle socks, are to be painted green to match the foliage of the treepole. 2 DIR-2013-28 10121 Miller Avenue 2 ; , � 9 S�p.ti: � <�r: ,` ,�il i ,,� � �� . � ,� �� , � ,: � .� ,� �_�, �:�: ; �p�k � �' "� �� .� � � :.� , . - . ; �"w . , . �. � ' � � �� „, i ` �� ,. � . , , , , ,, . i ; , .�, , -,:,, �,�,� , � �� a .�� ,: �,.._ � , - _' �, , � V �w ,. '�. `�� '�.�i.,. .� ��: � n' . . .. , _ . . t �� , ,.N« �'. � �,•' @w, A'i�",: ' - ��Z> :�. �:'.� . .n � ..� ,� .� . .� „„,'�. . � . .. . �x,, .. ��.;� as ' . . , k� �+ �_Y� .. . . f Y w-: .. ;.� + . �•:��.- � � .a. � w n � ` _..__�._. �. .,_�.. �..._.� .. . .....:. . f Exhibrt l: �,xisting �eat 5�cks Exhibit 2: Lxisung rsrai��t��I�zr� at Base Equipment The existing equipment is comprised of one 55' tall monopine with six T-Mobile panel antennas, one (1) doghouse (cable covering structure located at the base of the tree), three (3) BTS Cabinets, one (1) coax transition box, one (1) GPS unit, and associated utility f rame/equipment. Visibility The existing stealth, personal wireless service facility is located in the rear parking lot of an existing office complex and designed to mimic a coastal redwood tree with a textured trunk and realistic limbs/needles. The base of the tree is screened by vegetation on all sides, except a small gap on the south side for equipment access. The proposed improvements to the leaf socks, needle color change, and base branches of the tree pole are anticipated to further minimize the visibility of the facility. The cabinets, boxes and utility equipment are placed at the rear and sides of an existing masonry trash enclosure located at the southwest corner of the parking lot. The equipment is out of sight and is sufficiently screened by existing trees and vegetation. ACTION In accordance with Cupertino Municipal Code Section 19.164, the Director of Community Development deems the modification minor and approves the modification described in the plan set titled: "827839 Crown Castle Monopine" prepared by JG of V-One Design Group, and consisting of three (3) sheets labeled T-1, A-1 and A-21ast revised 08/26/13 and stamped as received 5/02/2014, except as may be modified by the conditions enumerated below. 1) BUILDING PERMIT REQUIRED This approval does not constitute building permit approval; a separate building permit is required. 3 DIR-2013-28 10121 Miller Avenue 2 2) CONSTRUCTION PLAN SET REVISIONS Prior to issuance of building permits, the construction plan shall include the following details: a. Sheet T-1 —The project description shall be revised to reflect the true scope of work, including the addition of new leaf socks, replacement of needled branches, repair to the first two rows of branches, and painting exposed electrical wires and equipment to match the foliage of the tree pole. 3) ACCURACY OF THE PROjECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and require additional review. 4) CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 5) NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 6) RADIO FREQUENCY ENERGY EXPOSURE The independent and cumulative emissions for the proposed facilities shall meet Federal Communications Commission regulations and guidelines to prevent public exposures to radio frequency energy emissions that are in excess of federal safety standards. Any cautionary signage should be in multiple languages, including English and Spanish. 4 DIR-2013-28 10121 Miller Avenue 2 7) ABANDONMENT In the event the antennas, associated equipment, or any portion of the facility thereof, are left unused for a period of 18 months the property owner or applicant shall bear the entire cost to remove the subject equipment and to restore the site to its previous condition. 8) MAINTENANCE The applicant shall maintain the facility to retain the natural appearance of the tree pole. 9) COLLOCATION REQUIRED The applicant shall design the facility to allow collocation of additional future antennas from other wireless service providers. The applicant shall allow on its mast any extension, the collocation of other antennas and related facilities where technically feasible and where visual intrusiveness is reduced in comparison to other siting alternatives. The collocation agreement shall be at market rates with reasonable compensation to the mast owner. Any future collocating antennas shall be subject to a separate permit approval. 10)PERMIT EXPIRATION In accordance with state law, this permit is granted for a period of ten (10) years, expiring on February 24, 2018. Prior to the permit expiration, the applicant may apply for a renewal of the permit, at which time the Community Development Director may review the state of wireless communication technologies to determine if the aerial facility can be reduced in height, size, or utilize better camouflage techniques. This approval is effective june 18, 2014. The fourteen calendar day appeal period will expire on July 3, 2014. Attachments: A: Plan Set B: RF Emissions Com liance Re ort re ared b sitesafe and dated 9/2/2013 Referenced attachments that may not be included with this mailed report are available in the Planning Department located at City Hall and may also be viewed at the City's website at www.c�ertino.orQ. Select the link to "Public Records"at the top bar, then "Planning Department"folder,then "DIR Approvals"folder, then "2013"folder. Select file number DIR-2013-28. G:Planning/PDREPORT/DIRreports/2013/DIIZ-2013-28.doc 5 j1 h �� .��°?� . � ,l.. � � '�.. _. . .5`... ._ ``1 y _�ta. a.: ��`��N. � � ._.. ,�.;r:•-- e`",'u•�. • w�R�:»Y�,�=+��B�Q"'• Y. ��. r f e: o rn�.� I i r�r�r e e x p e� � ,� �� G' RF EMISSIONS COMPLIANCE REPORT Crown Castle on behalf of T-Mobile Crown Castle BU: 827839 Site Name: SF922 Richwood Address: 10121 Miller Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 9/2/2013 Report Status: T-Mobile Is Compliant. Qc�OF ESS/pN ��tS,oO�QgI.ES Cp�,�o�.LG� � .,`� ?y � °� NO. 1883$ � � EXP. O6/3Q12015 David harles Cotton, Jr. �, � �, Q. Registered Professional Engineer (Electrical) "�'9T��CA``F��'� State of California, 18838, Expires 30-June-2015 Date: 2013-September-04 Prepared By: Sitesafe, Inc. 200 North Glebe Road, Suite 1000 Arlington, VA 22203 Voice 703-276-1100 Fax 703-276-1169 Engineering Statement in Re: Electromagnetic Energy Analysis Crown Castle BU: 827839 Cupertino,CA 95014 My signature on the cover of this document indicates: That I am registered as a Professional Engineer in the jurisdiction indicated; and That I have extensive professional experience in the wireless communications engineering industry; and That I am an employee of Sitesafe, Inc. in Arlington,Virginia;and That I am thoroughly familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission("the FCC"and"the FCC Rules")both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC's Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields; and That the technical information serving as the basis for this report was supplied by Crown Castle (See attached Site Summary and Carrier documents), and that T-Mobile's installations involve communications equipment,antennas and associated technical equipment at a location referred to as the"SF922 Richwood"("the site");and That T-Mobile proposes to operate at the site with transmit antennas listed in the carrier summary and with a maximum effective radiated power as specified by T-Mobile and shown on the worksheet,and that worst-case 100%duty cycle have been assumed; and That in addition to the emitters specified in the worksheet,there are additional collocated point- to-point microwave facilities on this structure and,the antennas used are highly directional oriented at angles at or just below the horizontal and,that the energy present at ground level is typically so low as to be considered insignificant and have not been included in this analysis; and That this analysis has been performed with the assumption that the ground immediately surrounding the tower is primarily flat or falling; and That at this time,the FCC requires that certain licensees address specific levels of radio- frequency energy to which workers or members of the public might possibly be exposed(at §1.1307(b)of the FCC Rules); and That such consideration of possible exposure of humans to radio-frequency radiation must utilize the standards set by the FCC,which is the Federal Agency having jurisdiction over communications facilities; and That the FCC rules define two tiers of permissible exposure guidelines: 1) "uncontrolled environments," defined as situations in which persons may not be aware of (the"general public"), or may not be able to control their exposure to a transmission facility; and(2) "controlled environments,"which defines situations in which persons are aware of their potential for exposure(industry personnel); and 1 of 5 �lsire That this statement specifically addresses the uncontrolled environment(which is more conservative than the controlled environment)and the limit set forth in the FCC rules for licensees of T-Mobile's operating frequency as shown on the attached antenna worksheet; and That when applying the uncontrolled environment standards,the predicted Maximum Power Density at two meters above ground level from the proposed T-Mobile operation is no more than 1.724%of the maximum in any accessible area on the ground and That it is understood per FCC Guidelines and OET65 Appendix A,that regardless of the existent radio-frequency environment, only those licenses whose contributions exceed five percent of the exposure limit pertinent to their operation(s)bear any responsibility for bringing any non- compliant area(s)into compliance; and That when applying the uncontrolled environment standards,the cumulative predicted energy density from the proposed operation is no more than 1.724%of the maximum in any accessible area up to two meters above the ground per OET-65; and That the calculations provided in this report are based on data provided by the client and antenna pattern data supplied by the antenna manufacturer,in accordance with FCC guidelines listed in OET-65. Horizontal and vertical antenna patterns are combined for modeling purposes to accurately reflect the energy two meters above ground level where on-axis energy refers to maximum energy two meters above the ground along the azimuth of the antenna and where area energy refers to the maximum energy anywhere two meters above the ground regardless of the antenna azimuth, accounting for cumulative energy from multiple antennas for the carrier and frequency range indicated; and That the Occupational Safety and Health Administration has policies in place which address worker safety in and around communications sites,thus individual companies will be responsible for their employees' training regarding Radio Frequency Safety. In summary,it is stated here that the proposed operation at the site would not result in exposure of the Public to excessive levels of radio-frequency energy as defined in the FCC Rules and Regulations,specifically 47 CFR 1.1307 and that T-Mobile's proposed operation is completely compliant. Finally,it is stated that access to the tower should be restricted to communication industry professionals,and approved contractor personnel trained in radio-frequency safety; and that the instant analysis addresses exposure levels at two meters above ground level and does not address exposure levels on the tower, or in the immediate proximity of the antennas. 2 of 5 'S��e 111 Crown Castle BU: 827839 SF922 Richwood Site Summary Carrier Area Maximum Percentage MPE T-Mobile � 209 0�0 T-Mobile 0.515°/a Composite Site MPE: 1.724% 3 of 5 ,S��e � T-Mobile SF922 Richwood Carrier Summary Frequency: 2100 MHz Maximum Permissible Exposure(MPE): 1000 NW/cm^2 Maximum power density at ground level: 12.09208 NW/cm^2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 1.20921 % On A�cis Area Max Power Max Power Height Orientation Density Percent of Density Percent of Antenna Make Model feet de rees true ERP atts NW/cm^2 MPE (NW/cm^2 MPE Ericsson AIR 33 B4A 62P 51 340 1601 2.623259 0.262326 5.123288 0.512329 Ericsson AIR 21 B4A B2P 51 340 1477 2.758938 0.275894 3.776041 0.377604 Ericsson AIR 33 64A 62P 51 100 1601 2.623259 0.262326 5.123287 0.512329 Ericsson AIR 21 B4A B2P 51 100 1477 2.758938 0.275894 3.776041 0.377604 Ericsson AIR 33 64A 62P 51 220 1601 2.623259 0.262326 5.123287 0.512329 Ericsson AIR 21 B4A 62P 51 220 1477 2.758938 0.275894 3.776041 0.377604 4 of 5 lsire T-Mobile SF922 Richwood Carrier Summary Frequency: 1900 MHz Maximum Permissible Exposure(MPE): 1000 NW/cm^2 Maximum power density at ground level: 5.14579 NW/cm^2 Highest percentage of Maximum Permissible Exposure: 0.51458 % On Axis Area Max Power Max Power Height Orientation Density Percent of Density Percent of Antenna Make Model feet de rees true ERP atts NW/cm^2 MPE NW/cm^2 MPE Ericsson AIR 21 62A 64P 51 340 687 1.283225 0.128323 1.756296 0.17563 Ericsson AIR 21 B2A B4P 51 340 687 1.283225 0.128323 1.756296 0.17563 Ericsson AIR 21 62A 64P 51 100 687 1.283225 0.128323 1.756296 0.17563 Ericsson AIR 21 62A B4P 51 100 687 1.283225 0.128323 1.756296 0.17563 Ericsson AIR 21 B2A B4P 51 220 687 1.283225 0.128323 1.756296 0.17563 Ericsson AIR 21 62A 64P 51 220 687 1.283225 0.128323 1.756296 0.17563 5 of 5 lsire SITE INFORMATION APPLICANT SITE I.D.#: 827839 TOWER CONTACT: CROWN CASTLE GT COMPANY LLC 510 CASTILLO STREEf STE.302 SANTA BARBARA,CA 93101 JOHN DOHM,AICP 825-957-1629 APPLICANT: CROWN CASTLE GT COMPANY LLC 510 CASTILLO STREEf STE.302 SANTA BARBARA,CA 93101 82�957-1629 PROPERTY OWNER: D&D REAL ESTATE LP 10121 MILLER AVENUE STE.200 CUPERTINO,CA 95014 APN: 369-07-0O1 SITE ADDRESS: 10121 MILLER AVENUE CUPERTINO,CA 95014 COUNTY: SANTA CLARA 20NING: HEART OF THE CITY SPECIHC PLAN AREA ZONING JURISDICTION: SANTA CLARA SIGNATURE BLOCK APPROVAL SIGNATURE DATE Projecf Manager Consfivcfion Manager RF Engineer Sife Acquisifion �o�� Conwlfant Property Owner 7-MObie RepresentaNve LE M N� PINE R WN C AS T O C O CROWN CASTLE BUN 827839 10121 MILLER AVENUE CUPERTINO, �A 95014 SF BAY MARKET VICINITY MAP � " �� `'��,� ertir.9 f�e��t t;l�s�a � z' �, � �J's � ;�„� u. c7'�f e ,�� x�3rai�ts ' f�e�i��tl� �,.,4�r��7;;1, „ E�i�la r^r'rusci�� "�,e �' i,w. c_ Lfil�PSiin y�'' ,_ c' 2' �;�C!��F rr�'li?{;f � ,., .. ° ° �f PR�Op,�.�ECT �= u AKCA i',�rk � r-'r;:,.-t�i��: cta:«,�-.!"'rr.�,.['+I+;r; � � Ct:�aertine �.1"Vir,%�t�iPi _ i� {>r�tlP �; i��rll ' E,aton El�n��nt�3v Y: 5 c.hrrrai �" _1 �, „ ti =- tr �'"li,J�,�, � �.�x�� .. :4 � „��r'4�,r. �', ��,�rr�fi w � �`.�s,:, � yy�.e �rfi�?;I��f: ,��;��c�rrer�o Safew� w i�itpt f�lsl;i r,��a�,s�n�z7i c�-��,g��Q ��rrk y � '-" � Sec�qwir,�c � E(errr��tr�rY `i;ti�,rsf � ?t,`r�.i;,yer r4c1 DRIVING DIRECTIONS FROM SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT +%d.', I ¢._„ ;Vl i n,w;r I iir}lf��:=,[jr,��Le,� ry� II G � ... NORTH � 1.HEAD SOUTHEAST ON GATEWAY BLVD 2.TAKE THE 1 ST RIGHT ONTO CLAYTON RD 3.MERGE ONTO CA-242 S VIA THE RAMP i0 OAKLAND 4.MERGE ONTO I-680 S 5.TAKE THE MISSION BLVD/STATE ROUTE 262 EXIT TOWARD I-880 6.KEEP RIGHT AT THE FORK,FOLLOW SIGNS FOR MISSION BLVD W AND MERGE ONTO STATE ROUTE 262 S/MISSION BLVD 7.KEEP LEFT AT THE FORK,FOLLOW SIGNS FOR INTERSTATE 880 S/SAN JOSE AND MERGE ONTO 1�80 S 8.iAKE THE EXIT ONTO I-280 N TOWARD SAN FRANCISCO 9.TAKE THE WOLFE ROAD EXfT 10.TURN LEFf ONTO N WOLFE RD 1 1.CONTINUE ONTO MILLER AVE 1 l.DESTINATION WILL BE ON THE RIGHT PROJECT TEAM PROJECT MANAGER:JULIA MALISOS CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 71 45 1 2-4770 jmalisos�core.us.com APPUCANT:GINBAR KETEM_A _ CORE DEVELOPMENTSERVICES TEL: (510)999-1737 gketema�core.us.com D��'o�'`�'��vZ; •t-. �,' , ,�„ F �--,c� s�Fr.�• !t t f.. . t_..� . . :k;� ' � �P� ....., „ - . ... .. ..+.,..J�l..�.o.�� , �wj ,, . *�; ` 11..• �� .;e��'��r � � �f��i�;�� i a 4;,�p a 1,:�4. V�f l• � RECE�� ; ,�IAY 0 2 2014 � � � PROJECT DESCRIPTION THIS IS AN UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY FOR THE T-MOBILE NETWORK CONSISTING OF THE INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF ANTENNAS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT. --- -- 1. REQUEST TO RENEWAL PERMR 2. NO NEW EQUIPMENT,ANTENNAS,OR SITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE BEING PROPOSED. ZON�NG MANAGER:_GINBAR KETEMA_____ CORE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TEL: (510)999-1737 gketema�core.us.com ARCHRECT%ENGiNEER:ROD_N_EY_BARNE$_______ V-ONE DESIGN G!?OUP 5100 CLAYTON RD.&1 STE.354 CONCORD,CA 9I521 TEL: (510)42(�0884 CODE COMPLIANCE ALL WORK AND MAIERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WRH THE CURREM EDI710NS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE I.00AL GOVHiNING AUTHORI7IES.NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMR WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODET. 1. CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE QNCL.TffLE 24 S 25� 2. 2010 CAUFORNIA BUILDMJG CODE 3. 2010 CAUFORNU MECHANICAL CODE 4. 2010 CAUFORNIA PLUMBING COOE 5. 2010 CAUFORNV�ELECTRIC CODE 6. 2010 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE 7. 2010 CALIFORNIA FRE CODE 8. 2010 CALIfORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 9. NFPA 72,2010 EDITION,NATIONAL RRE ALARM CODE,AS AMB�D� 10. ANSVHA-722-G UfE SAFETY CODE NFPA-101 11. LOCAL BUILDING CODE 12. CffY/COUNTY OItDINANCES 13. SHELT6t IS STi1TE OF CA APPROV�&INSPECTED,NOT FOR LOCAL INSPECTION DRAWING INDEX SHEET NO: SHEET TITLE T-1 TITLE SHEET,SITE INFORMATION AND VICINITY MAP A-1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN A-2 MONOPINE ELEVATIONS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS&(E)DIMENSIONS 8.CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE 8�SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME IF USING 11"X1 T'PLOT,DRAWINGS WILL BE HALF SCALE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS FOR TOWER/POLE IS PROVIDED BY CROWN CASTLE ACCESSIBILITY REQUIt?EMBJIS FAGLRY IS UNMANNED AND NOT fOR HUMAN HABRATION. USA NORTH HANDICAPP�ACC6S NOT REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WfTH THE 2007 � OF CENTRAL/NORTHERN CALIFOILNIAAND NEVADA CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE PART 2,111LE 24,PART 2 VOLUME 1, 1 CHAPTER 11 B.SECTION 1123B.2,EXCEPTION 1 1�00.227-2600 A7 iBAST 7W0 DAYS B@�ORH YW DIC � �;, � CROYVNh� t= �fi �f .� � � d_ �.. CROWN CASTLE GT COMPANY LLC S10 CASTILLO STREEf STE.302 SANTA BARBARA,CA 93101 cre�t: 10 ROLLINS ROAD SUITE 202 MILLBRAE,CA 94030 Agenh. . '�. ne�es;cr G�o.,c I�c. �� V-One Design Group 5100 Clayton Rd.B-1,Ste.354 Concord,CA 94521 Agent: (510)42Q0884 AUGUST 26,2013 Current Issue Date: BUN 827839 10121 MILLER AVENUE CUPERTINO,CA 95014 Site: Professional Seal: It a a violation of law for any person,uNess They are acfing under the d'recfion of a licensed Professional Architect/Engineer,to aMer this document. Rev. Date Description Ol OB/19/13 Zoning Dwgs 90� 02 OB/20/13 Zoning Dwgs 100� 03 OB/21/13 Zoning Dwgs 10096 04 OB/26/13 Zoning Dwgs 10096 OS 02/20/14 Zoning Dwgs 100� Project No.: 827839 Date: 08/26/13 Job No.: Scale: CAD F1e: Designed By: JG Checked By: RB TITLE SHEET SITE INFORMATION VICINITY MAP Sheet Tifle: � Sheet No.: J''T j 1 SCALE NOTE: IF DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON PUN DO NOT SCALE CORRECTLY,CHECK fOR REDUCiION OR ENURGEMENT FROM ORIGINAL PUNS. ENLARGED $ITE PLAN wp Y I(•�'r�'�✓�Y �"l./ 4 V��iT��; '2 �F '�f � �y(• ' s . 5 . � � �i,��{� _l.. _ �c.}��...:i�,?J_.-3/ •t.'�"�-.`.. � ,. \�. .-.... _. ._. . ,,,,.,..,..,o,,,,,r,.,", .■ �/{�-��,',� � . �� . .«s � . J •�. � �� K, li • s 1 � �� CROWNrt� .�'.�f CROWN CASTLE GT COMPANY LLC 510 CASTILLO STREEf STE.302 SANTA BARBARA,CA 93101 Client: �� 10 ROLLINS ROAD SUITE 202 MILLBRAE,CA 94030 Agent: ��,._.. e , �t..l��Ir'�._ i� V-One Design Group 5100 Clayton Rd.B-1,Ste.354 Concord,CA 94521 Agent: (510)420-0884 AUGUST 26,2013 Current Issue Date: BUN 827839 10121 MILLER AVENUE CUPERTINO,CA 95014 Site: Professional Seal: It is a violafion of law for any person,uNess they are acting under the d'section of a licensed Professional Architect/Engineer,to aMer this document. Rev. Date Description Ol OB/19/13 Zoning Dwgs 90X 02 OB/ZO/13 Zoning Dwgs 100� 03 08/21/13 Zoning Dwgs 10096 04 OB/26/13 Zoning Dwgs 10096 OS 02/20/14 Zoning Dwgs 100% Project No.: 827839 Date: 08/26/13 Job No.: Scale: CAD File: Designed By: JG Checked By: RB ENLARGED SITE PLAN Sheet Title: NORTH Sheet No.: � � .,.,,..�. :....� ...:�.,..,�.. , NOTE: REPLACE ALL BRANCHES � i � j � �_ (EJ T-MOBILE PANELANTENNAS, �TENNA SOCKS WILL BE INSTALLED NORTN ELEVATION - EXISTING MONOPINE DOGHOUSE _PARKING LOT ISLAND W/ SCREENING SHRUB$ J In � W _ LL N � � d � O m H � Q W H � Z U 0 < oe � � Di�-o2�i3 �� ". � �.�:�1.� . . . . . . ; ...� ,�� _ . _,.. ,�.,..._.�. �� _ . . . - . - �. .. .. `� 7 0 7 `� S`"`� i I WEST ELEVATION - EXISTING 1/4"=1'-0" �.5. TALLED � � CROI�l1�/Nh" j�' y �,l e CROWN CASTLE GT COMPANY LLC 510 CASTILLO STREEf STE.302 SANTA BARBARA,CA 93101 Client: 10 ROLLINS ROAD SUITE 202 MILLBRAE,CA 94030 Agent: �"�; .�t ��ia��.��;;�4!�c_ � V-One Design Group 5100 Clayton Rd.B-1,Ste.354 Concord,CA 94521 Agent: (510)42Q0884 AUGUST 26,2013 Current Issue Date: BUN 827839 10121 MILLER AVENUE CUPERTINO,CA 95014 Site: Professional Seal: It is a violafion of law for any person,unless they are acfing under the direction of a licensed Professional Architect/Engineer,to aHer this document. Rev. Date Description Ol OB/19/13 Zoning Dwgs90% 02 OB/20/13 2oning Dwgs 100% 03 OB/21/13 Zoning Dwgs 100R, 04 OB/26/13 Zoning Dwgs 10096 0.5 02/20/14 Zoning Dwgs 10096 Project No.: 827839 Date: 08/26/13 Job No.: Scale: CAD File: Designed By: JG Checked By: RB MONOPINE ELEVATIONS Sheet Tifle: Sheet No.: a� z o z a� scn� ,Z _ ___ __ - __--- 1/4"=1'-0"