Loading...
ASA-2014-01b City of Cupertino , ,, 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino,CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 C lJ P E RT 1 N O FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department May 28, 2014 Prometheus Real Estate Group Attn: Mike Ducote 1900 S. Norfolk St. #150 San Mateo, Ca. 94403 SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION LETTER—DP-2014-01, ASA-2014-01,TR-2014-18 This letter confirms the decision of the Planning Commission, given at the meeting of May 27, 2014, approving a Development Permit to allow the demolition and reconstruction of a clubhouse and seven new apartment units at an existing apartment complex (Biltmore Apartments); an Architectural and Site Permit to allow for the construction of a clubhouse, seven apartment units including parking lot, landscaping and other site modifications at an existing apartment complex; a Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal and replacement of 48 trees to facilitate the construction of an expansion and associated site improvements at an existing apartment complex, located at 10159 S. Blaney Avenue, according to Planning Commission Resolution No.(s) 6740, 6741 and 6742. Please be aware that if this Permit is not used within a two-year period,it shall expire on May 27, 2016. Also, please note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar days from the mailing of the notice of the decision. If this happens, you will be notified of a public hearing, which will be scheduled before the City Council. Sincerely, i C� / Kaitie Groeneweg Assistant Planner Planning Department Enclosures: Resolution 6740, 6741 and 6742 g:/planning/post l�earing/actionletterDP-2014-01,ASA-2014-01,TR-2014-18 ASA-2014-01 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6741 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CLUBHOUSE AND SEVEN APARTMENT UNITS INCLUDING PARKING LOT, LANDSCAPING AND OTHER SITE MODIFICATIONS AT AN EXISTING APARTMENT COMPLEX LOCATED AT 10159 S BLANEY AVENUE (369-03-008) SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: ASA-2014-01 Applicant: Mike Ducote Property Owner: Biltmore Apartments Location: 10159 S Blaney Avenue(APN: 369-03-008) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL PERMIT: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval Permit as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; Given that the project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance and has been designed to be compatible with and respectful of adjoining land uses, the project will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience. 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 19.168, Architectural and Site Review, of the Cupertino Municipal Code, the General Plan, any specific plan, zoning ordinances, applicable planned development permit, conditional use permits, variances, subdivision maps or other entitlements to use which regulate the subject property including, but not limited to, adherence to the following specific criteria: Resolution No.6741 ASA-2014-01 May 27,2014 a. Abrupt changes in building scale have been avoided. A gradual transition related to height and bulk has been achieved between new and existing buildings. The project is compatible with the scale of the surrounding residential buildings and streetscape in terms of height, bulk, and form. The proposed two-story height would generally be about the same height as the surrounding apartment complexes. b. Design harmony between new and existing buildings has been preserved and the materials, textures and colors of new buildings harmonize with adjacent development with design and color schemes, and with the future character of the neighborhood and purposes of the zone in which it is situated. The location, height and materials of walls, fencing, hedges and screen planting harmonize with adjacent development. Unsightly storage areas, utility installations and unsightly elements of parking lots have been concealed. Ground cover or various types of pavements have been used to prevent dust and erosion, and the unnecessary destruction of existing healthy trees has been avoided. Lighting for development is adequate to meet safety requirements as specified by the engineering and building departments, and shielding to adjoining property owners. The project is designed in a modern architectural theme to update the project and connect it with other recently approved units within the complex. The location, height, and massing of the buildings are compatible with the adjacent and surrounding developments. All above ground utility installations are required to be screened from public view. The number, location, color, size, and height of proposed landscaping has been planned to conform to the Protected Tree Ordinance standards and shall positively affect the appearance of the site, and harmonize with the existing development. c. The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping of outdoor advertising signs and structures have been designed to minimize traffic hazard, positively affect the general appearance of the neighborhood and harmonize with adjacent development. If signage is requested, the project is required to submit a master sign program in order to ensure that exterior signage is designed and located to minimize traffic hazards, positively affect the general appearance of the neighborhood, and harmonize with adjacent development. d. This new development has been designed to protect residents from noise, traffic, light and visually intrusive effects by use of buffering, setbacks, landscaping, walls and other appropriate design measures. The project has been designed to protect residents from noise, traffic, light and vfsually intrusive effects by use of setbacks, landscaping, walls and other appropriate design measures. NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of the maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 2 thereof,: The application for an Architectural and Site Approval Permit, Application no. ASA-2014-01 is hereby recommended for approval and that the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. ASA-2014-01 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of May 27, 2014, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Resolution No.6741 ASA-2014-01 May 27,2014 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set dated May 16, 2014, consisting of 19 sheets labeled G0.0, SP1.0, SP1.1, SP1.3, A2.1, A2.2, A3.1, A4.0, A4.1, A5.1, A5.2, C-1.0, L-0.1, L-0.2, L-1.1, L-1.2, L-2.1, and L-2.2, entitled, "Biltmore Clubhouse, 10159 S Blaney Avenue, Cupertino, CA" prepared by Studio T; Architecture, Planning&Urban Design, except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. ACCURACY OF PROTECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 3. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file nos. DP-2014-01 and TR-2014-18 shall be applicable to this approval. 4. FINAL BUILDING DESIGN The final building design and exterior treatment plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. T'he Director of Community Development may approve additional designs or make minor variations as deemed appropriate. The final building exterior plan shall closely resemble the details shown on the original approved plans. Any exterior changes determined to be substantial by the Director of Community Development shall require a modification approval. 5. FINAL ARCHITECTURAL SITE, AND LANDSCAPING DETAILS Prior to building permit issuance, the final architectural, site, and landscaping de tails shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development, including,but not limited to: a. Building design and exterior treatments b. Frontage details c. Paving details d. Landscaping and tree selection and arrangement e. Private common open space area f. Fencing and lighting details 6. REPLACEMENT PLANTING PLAN The final replacement planting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. The variety, size, planting distance shall be consistent with the City's requirements 7. ROOFTOP EQUIPMENT AND OTHER ABOVE-GROUND EQUIPMENT SCREENING All mechanical and other equipment on the building or on the site shall be screened so they are not visible from public street areas or adjoining developments. The height of the screening shall be taller than the height of the mechanical equipment that it is designed to screen. A line of sight plan may be required to demonstrate that the equipment will not be visible from any public right-of-way. The location of the equipment and necessary screening shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building perxnits. Resolution No.6741 ASA-2014-01 May 27,2014 8. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 9. MODIFICATION OF APPROVED PLANS The Director of Community Development is empowered to review and approve amendments to the project considered minor per section 19.12 Administration—of the Zoning Ordinance. 10. INDEMNIFICATION To the extent permitted by law, the Applicant shall indemnify and hold harxnless the City, its City Council, its officers, employees and agents (the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void this ordinance or any permit or approval authorized hereby for the project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. The City may, in its sole discretion, elect to defend any such action with attorneys of its choice. 11. NOTICE OF FEES DEDICATIONS. RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Govern ment Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27�h day of May, 2014, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California,by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chair Brophy,Vice Chair Lee, Sun, Gong,Takahashi NOES: COMMISSIONERS:none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/Aarti Shrivastava /s/Paul Bro�hy Aarti Shrivastava Paul Brophy, Chair Assistant City Manager Planning Commission G:\Planning\PDREPORT\RES\2014\ASA-2014-01 res.doc • • or a � � ona . n orma ion . ee � e : _ _ _ _