Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
27. Oaks Shopping Center Sand Hill Properties
CITY OF CUPERTtNO Summary Agenda Item No. a7 City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 Fax: (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department Agenda Date: August 5, 2008 Application: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 Applicant : Karen Ngo, Sand Hill Properties Owner: Modena Investment LP & Sunnyvale Holding LLC Property Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard (Oaks Shopping Center) APPLICATION SUMMARY: USE PERMIT and ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL (file nos. U-2007-04 and ASA-20Q7-06) to demolish a theater and 2,430 square feet of commercial space and construct a 4-story, 122-room hotel; a 3-story, 56,200 square-foot mixed use retail/office/conference center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements in two development phases at an existing shopping center. EXCEPTION {file rio. EXC-2008-07) to the Heart of the City Specific Plan to reduce one side yard setback to 15 feet for a proposed 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 56,200 square-foot mixed use retail/office/conference center building at an existing shopping center. TENTATIVE MAP (TM-2007-09) to subdivide an 8.1 net acre parcel into'two parcels of 3.0 acres and 5.7. acres in size, with one parcel to be further subdivided into four commercial condominium units and a common area lot. TREE REMOVAL {TR-2008-02) request to remove and replace approximately 47 trees that are part of an approved landscape plan for an existing shopping center. RECOMMENDATIONS: On a unanimous vote the Planning Commission recommended: • approval of a negative declaration for the project; and • approval of the project per Resolutions Nos. 6516, 6517, 6518, 6519, 6520 r z~-~ Applications: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-Ob, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 2 August 5, 2008 Staff believes the applicant's plan is a workable concept that can be approved with several modifications that the applicant continues to oppose. On balance these seem Like reasonable compromises that allow the applicant to proceed while protecting the longer term public interests relating to preserving the redevelopment potential and future viability of the Oaks Shopping center and aesthetics of the new buildings. Staff recommended conditions address project phasing, Mary Avenue setback and landscaping and the street improvements along Stevens Creek Boulevard. These conditions are outlined in the "Staff Comments" section of this report. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission reviewed the project on May 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008 and took public testimony at both hearings (Exhibit A-3). A 1/z mile radius was noticed for the hearings. Over 1,500 notices were mailed to property owners and given to Oaks Shopping Center tenants. The City Council reviewed the project on June 17, 2008 (Exhibit A-3} and continued it to its August 5, 2008 hearing. DISCUSSION Cift~ Council Member Comments and Directions • Evaluate whether an alI office and conference center mixed use project will enable you to develop this project as one phase. • The project needs additional noticing; more public input. • Minimal (less than 10 spaces) to no parking loss on Mary Avenue is desired. • The hotel needs better architectural detailing, particularly on the westerly side of the building. ' • Install Heart of the City landscaping improvements along the whole Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage (westerly driveway to Mary Avenue). • Do not require a contribution toward highway bridge improvement. Shift funds to street landscaping improvements. • Remove and replace dead trees, including field-grown oaks for previously removed large oaks. • Clarify office building and conference center proposal. • if the underground garage is limited to hotel guests and mixed-use building tenants, explain how you would force them to use it, instead of the more convenient surface parking lots. • Contact the Marriott Corp, and find out their policies on sustainability for their hotel operations. • Provide computer visual simulations of the hotel and mixed-use building in their site contexts. • Calculate floor area ratios for the proposed development and the remaining shopping center. 27-2 Applications: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 _ 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 3 August 5, 2008 Public comments There were numerous comments relating to aesthetics, landscaping, traffic, breaking up of the ownership and building design that are detailed on the attached exhibit B-3. Applicant Comments At the June 17~ hearing, the applicant stated that his plan was to lease back three acres from the property owner in order to build the hotel and mixed use building. The Marriott Residence Inn is an extended-stay type of hotel that should not compete with surrounding hotels because of the type of customer it attracts (those staying 5 days or longer), which are currently going elsewhere ixi the area. Transient occupancy tax is estimated to be $600,000 annually and traffic is less because of the infrequency of guest turnover. The project must be phased because there will be different lenders-one for each building. Staff asked for a greater than 20 feet Mary Avenue setback because it felt the building height needed to be mitigated by landscaping in the public right-of-way. Just pushing the building forward does not help as it would eliminate 16 hotel rooms. Proposed Mary Avenue setback of 20 feet is adequate. Doing aII of the Heart of the City landscape improvements on Stevens Creek Boulevard does not make sense at this time because future redevelopment of the main shopping center buildings will cause the removal of the landscape improvements between the driveways. The applicant will work with staff to improve hotel design, particularly the visible uppex floors on the west side of the building. The applicant does not wish to return to the Planning Commission for design review. Both buildings are needed to make the project feasible. A smaller hotel and a smaller mixed-use building would make the project infeasible. The subdivision and condominium plan are also necessary to make the project move forward. In response to the City Council member comments and directions, the applicant provided the following written replies in an email to staff. Applicant responses (full text) are in bold-face capital letters in Exhibif C-3: • "One development phase does not work for us and neither does a phased condo plan. We must have approval for the condo division for the hotel and mixed use building at time of project approval. This is a lender driven requirement." 27-3 Applications: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 4 August 5, 2008 • "We have set up an informational meeting for the Oaks Tenants for July 28th. We have also met with the owner of Glenbrook Apartments, Avery Ventrxres, and they have expressed support for our project." • "Revised site plan attached, putting in finger islands for trees along section of Mary (Avenue) in front of hotel. Loss of parking spaces on Mary Avenue limited to 4.... We are revising the elevation facing the freeway to add more detail to floors 3 and 4..." • "We agree to improve the section (of Stevens Creek Boulevard) directly in front of the Shane (Company} to and including the main (east) driveway." • "We expect quasi-office tenants, such as, medical, dental, insurance uses (to occupy the mixed-use building.)." • "We can ask the hotel to inform guests upon check-in that they need to park in the garage and we can also post signs stating hotel parking is in the garage." • "... (Marriott Corporation) referred us to the USGBC's LEED Guide. They do not have their own program (for sustainability)." City Sta,~'Comments • Noticing: Per City Council direction, the City Council hearing was advertised using display ads in the Cupertino Courier for two weeks prior to the hearing. • Previous Oak Tree Removal: Staff did some additional research and found three specimen oak trees had been removed from the shopping center within the past few years. Two were removed with a tree removal permit and replaced. Another was approved for removal by staff under emergency conditions and was nat replaced. Any condition of approval should be modified to require one field grown native oak tree as a replacement. • Floor Area Ratios (FARE Parcel Proposed FAR No.1 (Hotel & Mixed Use) 90% No. 2 (Shopping Center Remainder} 24% • Development Phasing/Property Subdivision: Staff has opposed development phasing for this project. Staff prefers that both buildings be completed at the same time. Under the applicant's proposal, staff feels the second phase may not be built and it would be a constraint to potential, future comprehensive redevelopment of the shopping center. The land where the mixed use building is located is potentially an integral part of future redevelopment of the shopping center and should not be put at risk by potentially locking it up in a different ownership from the rest of the shopping center. That portion of the property should be retained by the shopping center ownership unsubdivided until such time when the City has a bonafide, ready-to- 27-4 Applications: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-Ob, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 5 August 5, 2008 be-built development proposal. Adopting a phased condominium plan, pursuing a future line Iot adjustment for the mixed-use building should address the applicant's needs and reduce future development review time, while addressing the legitimate concerns of the City to keep the parcel whole until such time as there is a solid development application and appropriate sureties that' it will be built. • Mary Avenue Landscaping/Street Parking Loss: The idea of converting a limited number of Mary Avenue parking spaces to provide landscape "finger' islands has merit. It should achieve a greater visual setback for the hotel while minimizing on-street parking loss on Mary Avenue. The applicant can also achieve greater building setback from Maxy Avenue by eliminating eight hotel rooms at the end of the hotel building where the setback on Mary Avenue is most constrained. This will reduce the hotel by 6.5 % but will provide much needed setback and landscaping that will work with the landscaped finger islands to soften the bulk and mass of the four-story hotel as viewed from Mary Avenue. It has the side benefit of reducing some of the parking demand. • Stevens Creek Boulevard (Heart of the City Landscaping_ The development addition is significant and will increase the shopping center building square footage by 137%. The applicant should install the full Heart of the City landscape improvement from the westerly driveway to Mary Avenue and a modified, and less costly, landscape improvement between the driveways because of the restricted frontage depth. The suggestion at the last Council meeting that this is done in-lieu of a contribution to the Highway 85 bridge enhancement seems like a reasonable compromise. • Hotel Design: Some minor design additions were made to address City Council concerns about the hotel design. Since the June 17th plan set, the applicant has added a number of faux balcony grills to the third floor westerly elevation. The brick base on the same elevation was eliminated at the suggestion of staff because' it will not be a visible element. No other changes were made to the elevations. Staff recommends that the west elevation facing Highway 85 needs additional balcony and awning treatment at the second and third stories of the building. Staff has prepared recommended conditions of approval (Exhibit D-3) to address the above issues. 27-5 Applications: U-2007-04; ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 6 August 5, 2008 ENCLOSURES Exhibit A-3: Staff Reports to City Council dated June 17, 2008 and to the Planning Commission dated May 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008, including initial study, ERC recommendation and Negative Declaration Exhibit B-3: Summary of Public Testimony at June 17~ Council Meeting and additional emailed public comments Exhibit C-3: Applicant responses to City Council direction and staff notes. Exhibit D-3: Staff recommended conditions of approval Plan Set Prepared by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner Submitt~ki bye f ~ /ba • Steve Piase ' i Director, Community Development Approved by: David W. Knapp City Manager G:\Planning\PDREPORT\CC\U-2007-04 ASA-2007-06 TM-2007-09 EXC-2008-07 TR-28-02 EA-2007-06 CC2 Report.doc 27-6 ..; Exhibit A-3 CIl`Y .OF cuPErtrrrvo Summary Agenda Item No. , City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 Fax: _(408) 777-3333 Community Development Department Agenda Date: May 17, 2008 Application: U-2407-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 Applicant : Karen Ngo, Sand Hill Properties Owner: Modena Investment LP & Sunnyvale Holding LLC Property Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard (Oaks Shopping Center} APPLICATION SUMMARY: USE PERMIT and ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL (file nos. U-2007-04 and ASA-2007-06) to demolish a theater and 2,430 square feet of commercial space and construct a 4-story, 122-room hotel; a 3-story, 56,200 square-foot mixed use retail/office/conference center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements in two development phases at an existing shopping center. EXCEPTION (file no. EXC-2008-07) to the Heart of the City Specific Plan to reduce one side yard setback to 15 feet for a proposed 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 56,200 square-foot mixed use retail/office/conference center building at an existing shopping center. TENTATIVE MAP (TM-2007-09) to subdivide an 8.1 net acre parcel into two parcels of 3.0 acres and 5.1 acres in size, with one parcel to be further subdivided into four commercial condominium units and a common area Iot. TREE REMOVAL {TR-2008-02) request to remove and replace approximately 47 trees that are part of an approved landscape plan for an existing shopping center. RECOMMENDATION: On a unanimous vote the Planning Commission recommended: • approval of a negative declaration for the project; and • approval of the project per the model resolutions 27-~ Applications: U-2007-c1~, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-U~, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard 2 Project Data: General Plan Designation: Specific Plan: Zoning Designation: Acreage (Net}: Building Area: June 17, 2008 Commercial/ Residential Heart of the City Specific Plan P- Stevens Creek Boulevard Conceptual Planned Development Zoning 8.1 acres Existing Shopping Center: 73,056 sq. ft. Demo Theater (Phase 1}: -15,263 sq. ft. Demo Comm'1 Space (Phase 2): - 2,430 sq, ft. 122-Room Hotel {Phase 1): 61,822 sq. ft. Mixed-Use Bldg. (Phase 2): 56,194 sq, ft. Building Height: Max. Proposed Bldg. Height (Hotel) 44' 10" General Plan Maximum Height is 45 feet Stories: Hotel: 4 stories; Mixed-Use Bldg: 3 stories Parking. Shared Parking Required {Phase 1): 356 stalls Parking Supply (Phase 1): 494 stalls Shared Parking Required (Phase 2): 417 stalls Parking Supply {Phase 2}: 470 stalls on-grade garage podium 410 84 305 165 Zoning: Yes Project Consistency with: General Plan: Yes Environmental Assessment: Negative Declaration BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission reviewed the. project on May 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008 and took public testimony at both hearings (Exhibit A-2). A ~/z mile radius was noticed for the hearings. Over 1,500 notices were mailed to property owners and given to Oaks Shopping Center tenants. DISCUSSION Applicant Comments • See the applicant's written responses to the June 10~ Planning Commission staff report (Exhibit B-2). • Applicant has revised the condominium plan, changing the wording and reducing the number of commercial condominiums from four to two to address the Building Division's and Planning Commission s concerns (Exhibit C-2}. z~-a Applications: U-2007-04,'ASA-2007-06, TM-20b7-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 3 June 17, 2008 • Applicant has revised building elevation to address City Architect's design comments (Exhibit D-2). Changes are largely confined to the front (east) elevation only. • Applicant has indicated that a smaller hotel and/or smaller, mixed-use building is not financially feasible. • Applicant is not in favor of phasing the Stevens Creek Boulevard (Heart of the City, (HOC)) landscape and sidewalk improvements. The shopping center owner is not willing to share the cost of improvements and the applicant is not willing to bear the entire cost. They view the HOC landscaping as an "off-site" improvement because they are subdividing the property and the portion they want to develop has limited Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage. • Applicant proposes afive-year expiration period to initiate the Phase 2 work. Public Comments Between the first and second hearings, staff received two emailed comments about the project (Exhibit E-2). The Commissioners indicated they received many more emails, not copied to staff. Four citizens spoke at the second public hearing. • One of the four said the i/z mile radius mailing was inadequate, that the Oaks Center is being overbuilt. Both proposed buildings should be shrunk and the landscaped areas increased in size. • Another resident stated that properties next to freeways should be considered polluted (from air pollution) and that the City should discourage buildings in these areas because it puts residents, customers and employees in areas more hazardous to their health. • Another resident suggested that a portion of the commercial tenant space in the mixed use building should be reserved for independent business owners, not corporate chain stores. • The owner of Hobee's Restaurant wanted an explanation of how the parking supply and garbage collection would work since it appeared that some of the parking would be in an underground garage (not shared} and the central garbage enclosure would be on the Sandhill property. Cifei~ Sfa,~Comments 2~-s Applications: U-2007-(i4, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-0%, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 4 June 17, 2008 • Phasin Staff was not in favor of the phasing proposal. Staff felt the second phase would not be built and it would leave a gap in the shopping center. Staff preferred that both buildings be completed at the same time. • Mary Avenue Landscapingf Street Parking Loss: The hotel must have a more generous rear landscaped setback from Mary Avenue or else the hotel will appear to be too massive. This can be accomplished by setting the hotel back 20 additional feet from the Mary Avenue property line (40 feet total} and heavily landscaping the area with trees, or converting about 36 Mary Avenue diagonal parking stalls to landscaped area with street trees. • Stevens Creek Boulevard (Heart of the City, Landscaping The development addition is significant and will increase the shopping center building square footage by about 137%. The applicant should install the full Heart of the City landscape improvement from the westerly driveway to Mary Avenue. Because of the restricted frontage depth between the two driveways, a modified, and less costly, landscape improvement has been recommended by staff. • Hotel Design: This 4-story building is in a highly visible location and will silhouette above the adjacent one-story, retail center. Staff recommends the significant enhancement of the architectural detailing and building finishes. The City Architect recommended design changes that have not been fully executed by the applicant due to time constraints. Consequently, staff recommends a condition requixing the designs for both buildings be brought back for a separate City Council action with recommendation from the Planning Commission. • Contribution toward Stevens Creek Boulevard Bridge Improvement:, To improve pedestrian access and walkability, staff sought a contribution toward the pedestrian improvement of the Stevens Creek Boulevard bridge over Highway 85. An amount of $100,000 was sought to act as seed money toward such improvements as safety rails, pedestrian lights and bike lanes. Other projects next to bridges were required to make contributions or improvements and such improvements will principally benefit this property owner. • General Plan Commercial Development Allocation: Staff recommended that a discounted commercial development allocation of 18,770 square feet be applied to this 61,822-square foot, 122-room hotel because hotels generate far less peak hour traffic than general commercial uses. A hotel allocation could not be transferred from the Cupertino Square area because of a prior development agreement. Staff noted that the City Council established a precedent by approving the 100,000 square foot Public Storage facility project with an office/industrial development allocation of 10,000 square feet. 27-~0 Applications: U-2007-U~, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-U7, TR-2008--02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 5 June 17, 2008 • Reducing the Maximum Restaurant Seating of the Shoppin Cg enter: 'The protect contemplates constructing a 165-space underground parking podium that will not be available to customers and tenants of the rest of the shopping center. To avoid potential, future parking overflow problems, staff recommended modifying the 1986 master use permit to reduce the maximum allowable restaurant seating from $00 seats to 500 seats. The center -currently has 310 restaurant seats. • Sustainability: Staff recommends that the applicant achieve LEED Silver certification for both buildings. Planning Commission Comments • Phasing: The Commission was supportive of development phasing and accepted the applicant's proposal fora 5-year expiration period (after City Council approval) on the second development phase. • Mary Avenue Landscapin /g Street Parking Loss: The Commission agreed with staff that the hotel must have a more generous rear landscaped setback from Mary Avenue or else the hotel will appear to be too massive. They objected to the loss of any Mary Avenue street parking because it is a public benefit and is highly utilized by Memorial Park .and Senior Center users, De Anza College students and Flint Center attendees. in addition, it is an important parking supply for De Anza Flea Market attendees and the numerous attendees of festivals at Memorial Park. The 36 parking stalls proposed for conversion to landscaping are all in prime locations in close proximity to the activity centers. The Commission recommended that the Mary Avenue setback for the hotel be increased 20 additional feet (40 feet total} to avoid any Loss of Mary Avenue street parking. It was left with the applicant to decide how best to accommodate the increased Mary Avenue setback. Some suggestions included shrinking the size of the hotel and/ or mixed use building and/ or reconfiguring the shape of the buildings. Another alternative offered to the applicant was the sharing of an equivalent number of parking spaces on the shopping center property to compensate for the street parking loss, but the applicant was not receptive to the idea. • Stevens Creek Boulevard (Heart of the City} Landscaping The Commission supported the modified Heart of the City landscape improvement recommended by staff for the frontage segment between the two driveways, in lieu of improving the frontage next to the Shane Company. If the Council approves this 27-~~ Applications: U-2007-U~, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-~7, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard . Page 6 June 17, 2008 alternative, staff recommends the applicant should provide an irrevocable offer of dedication for the Shane Company frontage at this time. • Hotel Desi~ The Commission wanted to see enhancements on all four sides of the hotel. It also recommended that more detailed designs for both buildings be brought back for a separate City Council action with recommendation from the Planning Commission. • Contribution toward Stevens Creek Boulevard Bridge Improvement: The Commission wanted to improve the walkability across the bridge and saw potential connections between the hotel and the Bubb Road industrial park. A minority of the Commission felt the nexus for a bridge contribution was too weak. The Commission recommended a $25,000 contribution requirement toward bridge improvement, which was in line with other contributions sought from other developers with projects next to bridges. • General Plan Commercial Development Allocation: The Commission did not recommend a discounted commercial development allocation for the hotel, which means it supported a full allocation of 61,822-square foot for the 122-room hotel. Despite the precedent set by the City Council, the Commission felt uncomfortable recommending a discounted development allocation when there was no supporting general plan policies. • Reducing the Maximum Restaurant Seating at the Shopping Center: The Commission recommended modifying the 1986 master use permit (Exhibit C-1} condition to reduce the maximum allowable restaurant seating from 800 seats to 600 seats, which was the applicant's proposal. Another condition in that master use permit allows the Commission to open up the use permit to address parking issues in the event that parking becomes a problem. • Sustainability: The Commi~.sion recommends that the applicant achieve LEED Silver certification for both buildings and requires solar heating for the swimming pool. • Landscaping_ The Commissioners noted that the western property boundary has several dead trees not shown as dead or not shown to be removed on the plans. The Commission recommended that the Phase 2 landscaping on the west side of the mixed use building be shifted into Phase 1. This includes removal of any dead trees and their replacements in accordance with the protected tree ordinance; the substitution of native trees for the exotic tree replacements where feasible; and two field grown oaks to replace oaks previously allowed to be removed under emergency circumstances. 27-12 Applications: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-200$-02, EA-2007-06 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Page 7 June 17, 200$ • Condominium Map: The Commission recommends approval of the two Iot split but had difficulty comprehending the need for the condominium plan. There were also concerns expressed about approving a condominium plan if the second phase was not built. The condo plan was approved with the stipulation that the condo lines be adjusted by the final map stage to accommodated any approved changes to the site plan. ENCLOSURES Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 6516, 6517, 6518, 6519, 6520 Exhibit A-2: Staff Reports to Planning Commission dated May 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008, including initial study, ERC recommendation and Negative Declaration Exhibit B-2: Applicant's written response to the staff report, dated June 9, 2008 Exhibit C-2: Revised Condominium plans titled Cupertino Oaks Conceptual Condominium Plan, labeled C-1 and C-2. Exhibit D-2: Revised Building Elevation titled: Marriott Residence Inn, Cupertino, CA, sheet DR-7 Exhibit E-2: Public comments Plan Set Prepared by: Colin Jung, Seruor Planner Director, Community Development Approved by: David W. Knapp City Manager G:\Planning\PDREPORT\CC\U-2007-04 ASA-2007-06 TM-2007-09 EXC-2008-07 TR-2008-02 EA-2007-06 CC Reporkdoc 27-13 U-2007-04 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION N0.6516 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE~CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO DEMOLISH A THEATER AND 2,430 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT A 4- STORY, 122-ROOM HOTEL AND A 3-STORY, 56,200 SQUARE-FOOT MIXED USE RETAIL, COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND MEETING/CONFERENCE CENTER BUILDING OVER AN UNDERGROUND PARKING PODIUM AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; and 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive Generai Plan and the purpose of the Conditional Use Permits Chapter of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 3) The proposed development is consistent with the Heart of the City Specific Plan, except for the 15-foot side building setback for which an exception is requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for a Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. U-2007-04 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 27-14 Resolution No, 651b ~ U-2007-04 ~ June 10, 2008 Page 2 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein SECTION II: PR0I~ECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: U-2007-04 Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on Exhibits titled: "The Oaks Mixed -Use Project, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 47 pages labeled pages DR-1 through DR-9, DR-2.1, DR-3.1, SD-1, SD-2, CS-1, A-1 through A-4, SHT 1, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, TM-1 through TM-4, Condo Plan: C-1 and C-2, C-3 Compliance C-1, L1 through L-5, EXB-1 and two colored renderings of the project, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to construct a 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 56,194 square-foot mixed use building over a parking podium. For the 3-story, mixed- use building the first and second floors shall be devoted to general commercial uses as defined in the City's "CG" zoning district. The third floor shall be limited to meeting, banquet, party and conference uses, with late evening activities, subject to City use permit approval. All tenants and customers of said buildings shall have access to parking spaces in the underground parking podium. 3. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION The applicant shall receive a Heart of the City Axea commercial development allocation of 100,323 square feet that reflects the construction of a 122-room hotel and a 56,194 square-foot mixed use building. 4. PROJECT PHASING For building permit purposes, the applicant may phase the construction of the hotel, mixed-use building and their site improvements in two phases as described in the approved exhibits (see condition #1), except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. The second development phase shall have a use permit expiration of five years after City approval. 27-15 Resolution No. 6516 Page 3 U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 5. HOTEL REAR SETBACK The rear building setback for the hotel building shall be increased to a minimum of 40 feet to accommodate significant landscaping and trees to help screen the mass of the hotel. 6. BICYCLE PARKING The applicant shall provide bicycle parking facilities for the proposed development in accordance with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.100 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 7. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The landscape plan shall provide the following: a. The landscape plan shall include water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with Chapter 14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, and the pesticide control measures referenced in Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code. b. A modified Heart of the City landscape improvement along the parking row to the westerly driveway, consisting of a paver sidewalk and planting areas between the existing trees, similar in design to the Stevens Creek Boulevard sidewalk design on the north side of the street east of Sfelling Road. c. Native trees substituted for the proposed replacement trees where appropriate and feasible. The revised landscape plan shall include the locations of two field-grown native oak trees that will replace two Large specimen oaks that were previously removed due to hazardous conditions. d. Mary Avenue on-street parking shall not be removed other than what is needed for approved driveway cuts and abutting landscape bulbs. e. The landscape strip westerly of the proposed mixed use building shall be planted as part of the Phase 1 work. 8. MASTER USE PERMIT {FILE NO. 20-U-8b} MODIFICATION OF CONDITION N0.3 The conditions of approval of the master use permit for the Oaks Shopping Center {file no. 20-U-86) are incorporated by reference into this use permit. Condition #3 (Use Limitation) is hereby modified to reduce the maximum number of allowed restaurant seats from 800 to 600 to reflect the reduced shared parking supply proposed by this development application. 9. GREEN BUILDING At the building permit stage, the applicant shall qualify the new building{s) to achieve a LEED Silver designation. In addition, the swimming pool will be heated with solar heaters. 2~-~s Resolution No. 6516 U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 4 10. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The applicant shall record a maintenance agreement subject to the approval of the City Attorney for the maintenance of the shared driveways by the property owners of each of the lots. 11. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 12. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation xequirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. if you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 13. BUILDING MATERIALS AND ARCHITECTURE Applicant shall revise the hotel architectural plans to substantially comply with the re-design recommendations of City Architect, Larry Cannon, detailed in a May 30, 2008 email message to staff, and include: matching roof tiles; mortared roof ridges; inset windows (minimum of 4 inches); awnings; balconies; eave brackets; and masonry accents on major, first floor building elements, including the lobby entrance. Revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council with a recommendation from the Planning Commission. 14. PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS FOR HIGHWAY 85 BRIDGE Applicant shall contribute $25,000 toward the improvement of the pedestrian connections on the abutting bridge crossing over Highway 85. Said funding shall help fund safety railings, pedestrian-scaled lighting, permanently marked bicycle lanes, etc. on the bridge. 15. PUBLIC ART The applicant shall provide public art in accordance with General Plan policy 2- 66. Public art selection will be reviewed by the Fine Arts Commission. 27-~~ Resolution No. 6516 U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 .Page 5 SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 16. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 17. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 18. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 19. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 20. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 21. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre- and post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 22. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 23. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking 27-18 Resolution No. 6516 ~ - U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 6 and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee; e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $3,540.00 minimum $ 6% of Site Improvement Cost or $2,OG0.00 minimum $ 2,000.00 $ 2,092.79 *~ $3,515.00 g. Park Fees: N/ A h. Street Tree By Developer ** Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 24. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from. public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 25. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 27-19 Resolution No. 6516 U-2007-04 Page 7 June 10, 2008 26. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The applicant shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement wifh San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 27. NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm-water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 28. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP~ REQUIREMENTS The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMP's are required. 29. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 30. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS The developer shall install traffic signal improvements at the Stevens Creek Blvd/Mary intersection. The improvements include installing new pedestrian signal heads, pedestrian push buttons, emergency vehicle pre-ernption equipment, repainting traffic signal heads and installing new poles, framework and signal heads on the east median and the southwest corner. The eastbound left-turn pocket shall be lengthened as directed by the City Engineer. 31. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. A11 traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. z~-zo Resolution No. 6516 U-2007-04 - June 10, 2008 Page 8 32. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. 33. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS {Section 66474.18 of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section 1V. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices / s/ Ralp~ualls Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 22046 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10~ day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller, Vice Chair Giefer, Rose Kaneda, Brophy NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: /s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki, Director Community Development Department G: lPlanninglPDREPORTlRES120071 U-2007-04 res.doc APPROVED: /s/Marty Miller Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission 27-21 ASA-2007-06 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6517 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 4-STORY, 122-ROOM HOTEL AND A 3-STORY, 56,194 SQUARE- FOOT MIXED USE RETAIL/COMMERCIAL OFFICE/MEETING & CONFERENCE CENTER BUILDIN G OVER AN UNDERGROUND PARKIlVG PODIUM AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD (OAKS SHOPPING CENTER) SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1} The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; and 2} The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of the Architectural and Site Review Chapter of the Cupertino Municipal Code; and 3) The proposed development is essentially consistent with, the Heart of the City Specific Plan, except for the exception request fora 15-foot sideyard setback from the westerly property line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Architectural and Site Approval is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. ASA-2007-06 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. z~-zz Resolution No. 6517 ABA-2007-Ob June 10, 2008 Page 2 SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: ABA-2007-Ob Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on Exhibits titled: "The Oaks Mixed -Use Project, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 47 pages labeled pages DR-1 through DR-9, DR-2.1, DR-3.1, SD-1, SD-2, CS-1, A-1 through A-4, SHT 1, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, TM-1 through TM-4, Condo Plan: C-1 and C-2, C-3 Compliance C-1, L1 through L-5, EXB-1 and two colored renderings of the project, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to construct a 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 56,194 square-foot mixed use building aver a parking podium. For the 3-story, mixed- use building the first and second floors shall be devoted to general commercial uses as defined in the City's "CG" zoning district. The thixd floor shall be limited to meeting, banquet, party and conference uses, with late evening activities, subject to City use permit approval. All tenants and customers of said buildings shall have access to parking spaces in the underground parking podium. 3. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION The applicant shall receive a Heart of the City Area commercial development allocation of 100,323 square feet that reflects the construction of a 122-room hotel and a 56,194 square-foot mixed use building. 4. PROTECT PHASING For building permit purposes, the applicant may phase the construction of the hotel, mixed-use building and their site improvements in fwo phases as described in the approved exhibits {see condition #1), except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. The second development phase shall have a use permit expiration of five (5} years after City approval. 27 - 23 Resolution No. b517 ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 3 5. HOTEL REAR SETBACK The rear building setback for the hotel building shall be increased to a minimum of 40 feet to accommodate significant landscaping and trees to help screen the mass of the hotel. ' 6. BICYCLE PARKING The applicant shall provide bicycle parking facilities for the proposed development in accordance with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.100 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 7. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The landscape plan shall provide the following: 1. The landscape plan shall include water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with Chapter 14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, and the pesticide control measures referenced in Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code. . 2. A modified Heart of the City Landscape improvement along the parking row to the westerly driveway, consisting of a paver sidewalk and planting areas between the existing trees, similar in design to the Stevens Creek Boulevard sidewalk design on the north side of the street east of Stelling Road. 3. Native trees substituted for the proposed replacement trees where appropriate and feasible. The revised landscape plan shall include the locations of two field-grown native oak trees that will replace two Large specimen oaks that were previously removed due to hazardous conditions. 4. Mary Avenue on-street parking shall not be removed other than what is needed for approved driveway cuts and abutting landscape bulbs. 5. The landscape strip westerly of the proposed mixed use building shall be planted as part of the Phase 1 work. 8. MASTER USE PERMIT (FILE NO. 20-U-8b) MODIFICATION OF CONDITION N0.3 The conditions of approval of the master use permit for the Oaks Shopping Center (file no. 20-U-8b) are incorporated by reference into this use permit. Condition #3 (Use Limitation) is hereby modified to reduce the maximum 27-24 Resolution No. 6517 ~ ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 4 number of allowed restaurant seats from 800 to 600 to reflect the reduced shared parking supply proposed by this development application. 9. GREEN BUILDING At the building permit stage, the applicant shall qualify the new building(s) to achieve a LEED Silver designation. In addition, the swimming pool will be heated with solar heaters. 10. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The applicant shall record a maintenance agreement subject to the approval of the City Attorney for the maintenance of the shared driveways by the property owners of each of the Lots. 11. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 12. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth hexein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may. protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section b6020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 13. BUILDING MATERIALS AND ARCHITECTURE Applicant shall revise the hotel architectural plans to substantially comply with the re-design recommendations of City Architect, Larry Cannon, detailed in a May 30, 2008 email message to staff, and include: matching roof tiles; mortared roof ridges; inset windows (minimum of 4 inches); awnings; balconies; eave brackets; and masonry accents on major, first floor building elements, including the lobby entrance. Revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council with a recommendation from the Planning Commission. 14. PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS FOR HIGHWAY 85 BRIDGE Applicant shall contribute $25,000 toward the improvement of the pedestrian connections on the abutting bridge crossing over Highway 85. Said funding shall 27 - 25 Resolution No. 6517 ~ ~ ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 5 help fund safety railings, pedestrian-scaled lighting, permanently marked bicycle lanes, etc, on the bridge. 15. PUBLIC ART The applicant shall pxovide public art in accordance with General Plan policy 2- 6b. Public art selection will be reviewed by the Fine Arts Commission. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 16. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 17. CURS AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 18. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 19. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 20. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 21. DRAINAGE Drainage. shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre- and post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 22. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of 2~ - 2s Resolution No, b517 ASA-2007-Ob June 10, 200$ Page 6 underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 23. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $3,540.00 minimum $ 6% of Site Improvement Cost or $2,060.00 minimum $ 2,000.00 $ 2,092.79 ** $3,515.00 g. Park Fees: N/ A h. Street Tree By Developer '~'~ Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading. Bond:100 % of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 24. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. z~ - z~ Resolution No. 6517 ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page ~ 25. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 26. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The applicant shall dedicate to the City alI waterlines and appurtances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 27. NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)_ CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT . The applicant must obtain a Notice of Intent {NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP}, use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 28. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REQUIREMENTS The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMP's are required. 29. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 30. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS The developer shall install traffic signal improvements at the Stevens Creek Blvd/ Mary intersection. The improvements include installing new pedestrian signal heads, pedestrian push buttons, emergency vehicle pre-emption equipment, repainting traffic signal heads and installing new poles, framework and signal heads on the east median and the southwest corner. The eastbound left-turn pocket shall be lengthened as directed by the City Engineer. 31. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during 2~-is Resolution No. 6517 ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 8 construction. Ail traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manuai on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 32. TRASH ENCLOSURES The txash enclosure plan shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. 33. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 66474.18 of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of Phis resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices /s/Ralph Qualls Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 22046 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10~ day of June 200$, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller, Vice Chair Giefer, Rose Kaneda, Brophy NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST; APPROVED: /s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki, Director Community Development Department /s/Many Miller Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission 2~ - 2s Resolution No. 6517 ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 9 G: lPlanningtPDREPOR7IRESI2007L1SA-2007-06 res.doc 27 - 30 TM-2007-09 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION N0.6518 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING: APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE AN 8.1 NET ACRE SITE INTO TWO PARCELS, APPROXIMATELY 3.0 AND 5.1 ACRES IN SIZE, AND APPROVAL OF A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION PLAN TO FURTHER SUBDIVIDE THE 3.0 ACRE LOT INTO TWO CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND A COMMON AREA LOT. SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tentative Parcel Map, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof regixired to support the subdivision and condominium plan of said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan. 2) That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the General Plan. 3) That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of development contemplated under the approved subdivision. 4) That the design of the subdivision ar the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 5) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated there is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6} That the design of the subdivision and its associated improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at Iarge for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE I'T RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Tentative Parcel Map is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated i~~ t~s Resolution No. 6518 TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 2 Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the publzc hearing record concerning Application No. TM-2007-09 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 27, 2008 and June 10, 200$, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TM-2007-09 Applicant/Owner: Karen Ngo . Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on the Tentative Parcel Map titled: "Cupertino Oaks Tentative Map", consisting of four sheets labeled TM-1 through TM-4, and a condominium plan titled: "Cupertino Oaks/Conceptual Condominium Plan/ First Floor" and "Basement Floor", consisting of two sheets labeled C-1 and C- 2 prepared by BKF Engineers dated 4/14/08 and 6/02/08 respectively, except as may be modified by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. DEMOLITION RE UIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide' evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONSyRESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020{d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 4. RECORDATION OF EASEMENTS The applicant shall depict on the final subdivision map to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and the Director of Public Works, easements for all shared utility lines, and surface storm drainage, parking, waste collection and vehicular circulation that crosses property lines. 27-32 Resolution No. 6518 TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 3 SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLiC WORKS DEPARTMENT 5. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. b. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS . Curbs and guttexs, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 7. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 8. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 9. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 10. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre- and post- developmentcalculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 11. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 12. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking 27 - 33 Resolution No. 6518 TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 4 and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: _ d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: $ 6 % of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $3,540.00 minimum $ 6% of Site Improvement Cost or $2,060.00 minimum $ 2,OOO.oO $ 2,092.79 ~* . $3,515.00 g. Park Fees: N/ A h. Street Tree By Developer ** Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 13. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 14. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by ~ the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 2~-sa Resolution No. 6518 TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 5 1S. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The applicant shall dedicate to the City aII waterlines and appurtances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 16. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 17. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP~ REQUIREMENTS The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMP's are required. 18. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 19. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS The developer shall install traffic signal improvements at the Stevens Creek Blvd/Mary intersection. The improvements include installing new pedestrian signal heads, pedestrian push buttons, emergency vehicle pre-emption equipment, repainting traffic signal heads and installing new poles, framework and signal heads on the east median and the southwest corner. The eastbound left-turn pocket shall be lengthened as directed by the City Engineer. 20. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for alI vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD} standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 21. TRASH ENCLOSURES . The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. 27-35 Resolution No. 6518 TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 6 22. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF pNGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS {Section 66474.18 of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices j s/Ralph Qualls Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 22046 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10~ day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: . AYES; COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller, Vice Chair Giefer, Rose Kaneda, Brophy NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: /s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki, Director Community Development Department G:1 PlanninglPDRepoM IRes 120071TM-2007-09. d oc APPROVED: /s/Many Miller Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission 27-36 EXC-2008-07 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION N0.6519 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN EXCEPTION TO THE HEART OF THE CITY SPECIFIC PLAN FORA 15-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK ON A HOTEL AND MIXED USE BUILDING AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: EXC-2008-07 Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a setback exception to the Heart of the City Specific Plan, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the following with regards to this application: a) That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this chapter will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title; b} That the granting of the exception will not be injurious to property or improvements in the area nor be detrimental to the pubic safety, health and welfare; and c) That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification and the minimum variance to accomplish this purpose; and d) That the proposed exception will not result in significant impacts to neighboring properties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the exception to the Heart of the City Specific Plan setback regulation is hereby recommended for approval subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution; and 27-37 Resolution No. b519 EXC-2008-07 June 10, 2008 Page 2 That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application EXC-2008-07, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 10, 2008 and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on Exhibits titled: "The Oaks Mixed -Use Project, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 47 pages labeled pages DR-1 through DR-9, DR-2.1, DR-3.1, SD-1, SD-2, CS-1, A-1 through A-4, SHT 1, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, TM-1 through TM-4, Condo Plan: , C-1 and C-2, C-3 Compliance C-1, L1 through L-5, and two colored renderings of the project, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. HEART OF THE CITY SETBACK EXCEPTION Approval is granted for a side yard setback exception from the Heart of the City Specific Plan requirements to allow the proposed hotel and mixed use building to have a minimum 15 foot setback from the westerly property line. 3. NOTICE _ OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirex~ents, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1); these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a}, has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 27-38 Resolution No. 6519 Page 3 EXC-2008-07 June 10, 2008 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of June 200$, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller, Vice Chair Giefer, Rose Kaneda, Brophy NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: APPROVED: / s /Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development G: G~pNT/Planning/Pdreport/Res/2008BXC-2008-07:doc / s / Marty Miller Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission 27 - 39 TR-2008-02 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION N0.6520 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TREE REMOVAL REQUEST TO REMOVE AND REPLACE APPROXIMATELY 47 TREES TO CONSTRUCT A HOTEL AND MIXED USE BUILDING AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TR-2008-02 Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for the removal and replacement of about 47 trees in conjunction with the development of a hotel and mixed-use building; and WHEREAS, the 47 trees are part of an approved landscape plan, subject to Chapter 14.18 of the Municipal Code, pertaining to Heritage and Specimen Trees; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for tree removal is hereby recommended for approval; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application TR-2008-02, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008 are incorporated by reference herein 27 - 40 Resolution No. 6520 - TR-2008-02 June 10, 2008 Page 2 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVAL ACTION The applicant is approved to remove a total of about 47 trees on site in accordance with the applicant's tree survey/removal plan identified as pages L-1 through L-5 dated either 4/15/08 or 4/17/08 in the approved plan set titled: "The Oaks Mixed- Use Project, Hyway 85 & Stevens Creek Blvd., Cupertino, CA", except as may be amended by the conditions of this Resolution. 2. TREE PROTECTION The City Arborist's recommendations for site design and tree protection during project construction as articulated in his July 24, 2007 report titled: A Tree Inventory and Review of the Proposed Development at the Oaks Shopping Center 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California" shall be incorporated in the building permit plan set and implemented during the course of demolition and construction of the project. 3. TREE PROTECTION BOND The applicant shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $100,000 to ensure protection of trees slated for preservation prior to issuance of grading, demolition or building permits. The bond shall be returned after completion of construction, subject to a letter from the City Arborist indicating that the trees are in good condition. 4. TREE REPLACEMENTS The applicant shall prepare a revised landscape plan at the building permit stage. The westerly landscape strip next to the proposed mixed use building will be advanced to the phase 1 work. Native trees shall be substituted for the proposed replacement trees where appropriate and feasible. That revised landscape plan shall include the locations of two field-grown native oak trees that will replace two large specimen oaks that were previously removed due to hazardous conditions and root barriers shall be installed to avoid conflicts with future phase 2 development. The revised plan shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. For any additional trees that are removed due to hazardous conditions ox are considered dead, the applicant shall be required to replace these trees in accordance with the Protected Trees Ordinance. Species and size of replacement trees shall ~be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department. 5. TREE REPLACEMENT IN-LIEU FEE The applicant shall pay an in-lieu fee for any trees that cannot be replaced on site in accordance with the City's Protected Trees Ordinance. 27-41 Resolution No. 6520 TR-2008-02 June 10, 2008 Page 3 6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constihxte written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 40-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a}, has begun If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller, Vice Chair Giefer, Rose, Kaneda, Brophy NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: /s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development APPROVED: __ /s/Marcy Miller Marcy Miller, Chair Cupertino Planning Commission G: ~ Planning 1 PDREPORT~ RES ~ 2007 ~ TR-2008-02res.doc 27 - 42 CITY OF CUPERTINO ~H~BR A ° Z 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: U-2007-04, ASA-2047-06, TM-2007-09, Agenda Date: June 10, 2008 EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 Applican# : Karen Ngo, Sand Hill Properties Owner: Modena Investment LP & Sunnyvale Holding LLC Property Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard {Oaks Shopping Center) APPLICATION SUMMARY: USE PERMIT and ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL (file nos. U-2007-04 and ASA-2007-06) to demolish a theater and 2,430 square feet of commercial space and construct a 4-story, 122-room hotel; a 3-story, 56,200 square-foot mixed use retail/ office/ conference center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements in two development phases at an existing shopping center. EXCEPTION {file no. EXC-2008-07} tv the Heart of the City Specific Plan to reduce one side yard setback to 15 feet for a proposed 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 56,200 square-foot mixed use retail/office/conference center building at an existing shopping center. TENTATIVE MAP (TM-2007-09) to subdivide an 8.1 net acre parcel into two parcels of 3.0 acres and 5.1 acres in size, with one parcel to be further subdivided into four commercial condominium units and a common area lot. TREE REMOVAL {TR-2008-02) request to remove and replace approximately 47 trees that are part of an approved landscape plan for an existing shopping center. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the model resolutions, make appropriate changes and recommend: • approval of a negative declaration for the project; and • approval of the project per the revised model resolutions Project Data: General Plan Designation: Specific Plan: . Zoning Designation: Acreage (Net): Building Area: Commercial /Residential Heart of the City Specific Plan P- Stevens Creek Boulevard Planned Development Zoning 8.1 acres Existing Shopping Center: Demo Theater (Phase 1): - Demo Comm'I Space (Phase 2): Conceptual 73,056 sq. ft. 15,263 sq. ft. - 2,430 sq. ft. 27 - 43 Use Permit, ASA, Tentative Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 21~v5 Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, T1VI-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 June 10, 2008 age 2 of 6 122-Room Hotel (Phase 1): 61,822 sq. ft. Mixed-Use Bldg. (Phase 2): 56,194 sq. ft. Building Height: Max. Proposed Bldg. Height (Hotel) 44' 10" General Plan Maximum Height is 45 feet Stories: Hotel: 4 stories; Mixed-Use Bldg: 3 stories Parking: on-grade ,garage podium Shared Parking Required (Phase 1}: 356 stalls Parking Supply (Phase 1): 494 stalls 410 $4 Shared Parking Required (Phase 2): 417 stalls Parking Supply (Phase 2): 470 stalls 305 165 Project Consistency with: General Plan: Yes Zoning: Yes Environmental Assessment: Negative Declaration BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission reviewed the project on May 27, 2008 and took public testimony (Exhibit A). Over 1,500 hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 1/2 mile radius of the project boundaries. The Commission received emailed (through staff) or verbal testimony from six residents. The Commissioners discussed numerous project topics and came to a general agreement on a number of them. On other topics, viewpoints were discussed, but a majority opinion did not seem to develop. DISCUSSION: Development Phasing. The applicant has proposed a phasing of his project with the hotel to be built immediately and the mixed use building to be constructed at an indefinite later time when the retail financing climate has improved and the applicant secures a .suitable commercial tenant{s). The first phase hotel has been designed to stand alone from a site planning standpoint. A majority of the Commissioners supported a phased project. Subdivision/Condomixuum Plan: The applicant has proposed to subdivide the property in order to purchase the parcel on which development is proposed. Ms. Ngo stated that the condominium subdivision plan was needed to separate the financing of the hotel project from the mixed use building and the hotel lender wanted to see the hotel project on a separate legal lot(s). A majority of the Commissioners favored the two lot division of the property, but opposed the further subdivision into four commercial condominium units. The Commissioners believe this condominium subdivision would preclude all future redevelopment opportunities on this property, which would not be in the best interests of the City. 27 - 44 Use Permit, ASA, Tentative Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 21za5 Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 June 10, 2008 Page 3 of 6 Hotel Design and Building Finishes: A majority of the Commissioners wanted an enhanced hotel design. The comments focused on the need for more detailing, better building finishes, reduce the perceived massing on the west elevation (Highway 85 side) and refer the design to City Architect Larry Cannon. Mr. Cannon had previously reviewed an earlier development plan and his comments were focused on the site planning issues, not the building design. Mr. Cannon has reviewed the plans and emailed his recommendations to staff (Exhibit B-1). His recommendations include better design integration with the rest of the shopping center by using a clay file on all roofs to match the shopping center buildings. Creating a more interesting building by defining its top with extended eaves and eave brackets on all roofs, and by defining its bottom, by extending the brick base all around the building. A further enhancement to separate the top from the bottom is a differently colored (darker} lower floors. Better building relief would be created, by insetting all of the windows and adding balcony grilles and awnings that project from the wall surfaces. The City Architect included several photos of newer Marriott Residence Inns in his comments. There was insufficient time for the applicant to make revisions to the plans and obtain approval from the hotel chain, so the design changes have been conditioned in the resolution subject to Planning Commission and City Council approval. Mary Avenue Parking and Traffic: There was no majority viewpoint on the conversion of 48 Mary Avenue street parking stalls to landscaping. One Commissioner was okay with the conversion, another was not in favor of the street parking loss, and another wanted to reduce the parking loss by not allowing street landscaping near the sports court and swimming pool. Staff is concerned with the visual mass of the hotel from Mary Avenue and strongly recommend an enhanced setback from the curb and a significant, landscaped (trees) element, regardless of whether that setback is achieved on the property by shifting or redesigning the structure, or by moving the curbline of the street. Some other ideas have surfaced that the Commission may wish to consider: • Delete the street landscaping next to the swimming pool and sports half-courf. This is not needed to visually setback the hotel project and will save approximately 12 street parking stalls. This solution has been incorporated into the model resolutions. The conversion of 36 parking stalls instead of 48 stalls may be more acceptable to Commission. • Shift the hote120 feet forward (south). With some redesign, the hotel will have a visually adequate rear setback and the Mary Avenue parking space conversion to 27 - 45 Use Permit, ASA, Tentatl,; a Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 21~~5 Stevens Creek Blvd ' U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2(?08-02 June 10, 2008 Page 4 of 6 landscaping will not be needed. This shift will reduce the phase 2 building pad and resultant building size. • To offset the loss of street parking, require the property owner to share an equivalent number of private on-site parking stalls on those days when there are festivals at Memorial Park. The Commission questioned whether the parking loss could be compensated by the creation of diagonal parking on the north side of Mary Avenue, in lieu of the existing parallel parking. Public Works staff was consulted on the question and indicated there was probably adequate right-of-way width to accommodate the change, but it was not a desirable alternative. Public Works is expecting a significant increase in bicycle traffic once the Mary Avenue Bicycle/Ped Bridge is open and diagonal parking does not function well with higher bicyclist flows. It may be possible to add more parallel parking along Mary Avenue. One commissioner had a question about the "No U-turn" prohibition on westbound Stevens Creek Boulevard at Bubb Road. According to Public Works the prohibition was added to create additional traffic capacity for right turn movements from Bubb Road to Stevens Creek Boulevard. In this location there is a high demand for traffic capacity between the West Valley Industrial Park and the Highway 85 on-ramps. Motorists have the ability to make U-turns at the west end of the Highway 85 bridge before reaching Bubb Road. Heart of the City Specific Plan Side Setback Exception: All of the Commissioners were okay with a 15-foot side setback for the hotel and mixed use building on the west (Highway 85) side of the property. An approval resolution is in the report. Location of the Heart of the City Landscape Improvements on Stevens Creek Boulevard: There did not seem to be a majority opinion on the extent of the Stevens Creek Boulevard landscape improvements as required by the Heart of the City Specific Plan. Two Commissioners favored shifting the improvement work between the two driveways, instead of the segment nearest Mary Avenue. Staff has conditioned the approval providing a full street improvement as required by the Heart of the City Specific Plan between Mary Avenue and the westerly driveway. A schematic of the improvement will be provided at the hearing. Highway 85 Bridge Improvements: The Commissioners had mixed feelings about this suggested development condition that would require the applicant to contribute funds toward the improvement of the abutting Stevens Creek Boulevard bridge that crosses over Highway 85. The recommended $100,000 contribution would provide seed money for enhanced 27 - 46 Use Permit, ASA, Tentak: e Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 21~;i5 Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 June 10, 2008 Page 5 of b pedestrian improvements, such as, safety railings, lights, bicycle lanes, etc. on the bridge. Some Commissioners did not see a nexus, another wanted to see pedestrian improvements and others noted that contributions were required of three other developers for different bridges (Stelling Road Bridge over Highway 280 and De Anza Blvd. Bridge over Highway 280) and the amount was debatable. A condition was added to the use permit and ASA resolutions and should be reviewed and discussed by the Commission. Tree Removal: There was a consensus among the Commissioners to recommend approval of the tree removal request provided that native trees are substituted for the proposed ornamental replacement trees to the extent possible and two field-grown oaks are planted on the property to replace two previous specimen oak tree removals allowed by the City. Sustainable Building Practices: Commissioners had different ideas on how sustainable building practices should be implemented by this project. Since the City is still formulating a strategy for sustainability, staff feels it would be best to require the applicant to achieve a LEED Silver certification for the buildings and let the applicant decide which practices to implement to achieve that standing. General Plan Development Allocation: The Commissioners had mixed feelings about recommending a discounted commercial development allocation for the hotel portion of the project. The General Plan recognizes the wide disparity in peak hour traffic generation by hotels (0.4 trips/room} versus general commercial (2.6 trips/1,000 square feet) and thus treats these commercial uses differently in the development allocation tables. The 61,822 square-foot, 122-room hotel generates as much peak hour traffic as 18,770 square feet of general commercial space. Presently, the General Plan assigns a hotel development allocation only to the Vallco Planning Area (Cupertino Square), which cannot be transferred away because of the existing development agreement. Staff recommends a discounted development allocation for just the hotel (18,770 square feet). The hotel cannot be converted in the future to a more traffic-intensive commercial use without use permit approval, at which time the Commission can deduct an additional allocation for any intensification. Reduction in Allowed Number of Restaurant Seats in the Shopping Center: The Commissioners should confirm that they are agreeable with reducing the maximum allowable restaurant seating at the shopping center from 800 seats to 500 seats 'as articulated in the 1986 master use permit for the shopping center (Exhibit C-1). The completion of the second phase would provide fora 165-car underground garage 27 - 47 Use Permit, ASA, Tentati~ z Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 21;;5 Stevens Creek Blvd u-2oo~-04, .ASA-2007-06, TM-2oo~-os, Exc-Zoos-o~, Tx-2ao8-o2 June 10, 2Q08 Page 6 of 6 - ~G that the applicant has stated would be unavailable to the customers and employees of the rest of the shopping center. Currently, the shopping center has 310 restaurant seats. Any new restaurants located in the mixed-use building should. have access to the parking spaces in the garage. Public Comments: Four residents spoke at the May 27~ meeting. One resident thought the buildings were too massive for the area and was concerned with the loss of the view of the mountains from Mary Avenue. She supported planting native trees and shrubs on the property. A second resident said the City shouldn't put people next to the freeways because of the increased air pollution levels from vehicles, which increases the chances for health problems. A third resident said the site was overbuilt and the hotel needed a lot of redesign work. Additional traffic was a concern, especially with the growth of enrollment at De Anza College. Another resident supported the project and thought it was good idea to demolish the vacant theater that is benefiting no one. The attached email message was received by staff after the first hearing. (Exhibit D-1). ENCLOSURES: Model Resolutions Exhibit A-1: Planning Commission staff report with attachments dated May 27, 2008 Exhibit B-1: City Architect Hotel Design Recommendations Exhibit C-1: City Council Action Letter for file no. 20-U-86 Exhibit D-1: Ernailed public comments Plan Set Submitted by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developme G: Planning/PDReport/pcUreports/2007ureports/ U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 pc2.doc 27 - 48 U-2007-04 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO DEMOLISH A THEATER AND 2,430 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL BUILDING AND CONSTRUCT A 4- STORY, 122-ROOM HOTEL AND A 3-STORY, 56,200 SQUARE-FOOT MDCED USE RETAIL, COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND MEETING/CONFERENCE CENTER BUILDING OVER AN UNDERGROUND PARKING PODIUM AND SITE 1MPROVEMENTS AT AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1} The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, genexal welfare, or convenience; and 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of the Conditional Use Permits Chapter of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 3) The proposed development is consistent with the Heaxt of the City Specific Plan, except for the 15-foot side building setback for which an exception is requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for a Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. U-2007-04 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 27-49 Resolution No. U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 2 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: U-2007-04 Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on Exhibits titled: "The Oaks Mixed -Use Project, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 47 pages labeled pages DR-1 through DR-9, DR-2.1, DR-3.1, SD-1, SD-2, CS-1, A-1 through A-4, SHT 1, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, TM-1 through TM-4, Condo Plan: C-1 and C-2, C-3 Compliance C-1, L1 through U5, EXB-1 and two colored renderings of the project, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to construct a 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 56,194 square-foot mixed use building over a parking podium. For the 3-story, mixed- use building the first and second floors shall be devoted to general commercial uses as defined in the City's "CG" zoning district. The third floor shall be limited to meeting, banquet, party and conference uses, with Late evening activities, subject to City use permit approval. All tenants and customers of said buildings shall have access to parking spaces in the underground parking podium. 3. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION The applicant shall receive a Heart of the City Area commercial development allocation of 74,964 square feet that reflects the construction of a 122-room hotel and a 56,194 square-foot mixed use building. The building area of the hotel, 61,822 square feet, has been discounted to 18,770 square feet of general commercial allocation based on a peak hour traffic trip equivalency. 4. PROTECT PHASING For building permit purposes, the applicant may phase the construction of the hotel, mixed-use building and their site improvements in two phases as described in the approved exhibits (see condition #1), except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 27 - 50 Resolution No. U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 3 5. BICYCLE PARKING The applicant shall provide bicycle parking facilities for the proposed development in accordance with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.100 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 6. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The landscape plaxi shall provide the following: a. The landscape plan shall include water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with Chapter 14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, and the pesticide control measures referenced in Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code. b. Full Heart of the City Specific Plan landscape and sidewalk (paver) improvements between Mary Avenue and the row of parking fronting on Stevens Creek Boulevard; and a modified Heart of the City landscape improvement along the parking row to the westerly driveway, consisting of a paver sidewalk and planting areas between the existing trees similar in design to the Stevens Creek Boulevard sidewalk design on the north side of the street east of Stelling Road. c. Native trees substituted for the proposed replacement trees where appropriate and feasible. The revised landscape plan shall include the locations of two field-grown native oak trees that will replace two large specimen oaks that were previously removed due to hazardous conditions. d. Mary Avenue landscape improvements fronting the pool and half sport court shall be deleted. Mary Avenue on-street parking removal due to landscape improvements and driveway cuts shall be up to 36 parking stalls. Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining these Mary Avenue street trees. 7. MASTER USE PERMIT (FILE NO. 20-U-86) MODIFICATION OF CONDITION N0.3 The conditions of approval of the master use permit for the Oaks Shopping Center (file no. 20-U-86} are incorporated by reference into this use permit. Condition #3 (Use Limitation) is hereby modified to reduce the maximum number of allowed restaurant seats from 800 to 500 to reflect the reduced shared parking supply proposed by this development application. 8. GREEN BUILDING At the building permit stage, the applicant shall qualify the new building{s) to achieve a LEED Silver designation. 27-51 Resolution No. U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 4 9. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The applicant shall record a maintenance agreement subject to the approval of the City Attorney for the maintenance of the shared driveways by the property owners of each of the Lots. 10. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 11. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d} (1}, these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020{a}, has begun. if you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 12. BUILDING MATERIALS AND ARCHITECTURE Applicant shall revise the hotel architectural plans to substantially comply with the re-design recommendations of City Architect, Larry Cannon, detailed in a May 30, 2008 email message to staff, and include: matching roof tiles; mortared roof ridges; inset windows (minimum of 4 inches); awnings; balconies; eave brackets; and masonry accents on major, first floor building elements, including the lobby entrance. Revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council with a recommendation from the Planning Commission. 13. PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS FOR HIGHWAY 85 BRIDGE Applicant shall contribute $100,000 toward the improvement of the pedestrian connections on the abutting bridge crossing over Highway 85. Said funding shall help fund safety railings, pedestrian-scaled lighting, permanently marked bicycle lanes, etc. on the bridge. 14. PUBLIC ART The applicant shall provide public art in accordance with General Plan policy 2- 66. Public art selection will be reviewed by the Fine Arts Commission. 27-52 Resolution No. U-2007-04 Page 5 June 10, 2008 SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT 15. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 16. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 17. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 18. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 19. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 20. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre- and post- developmentcalculations must be provided to indicate whethex additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 21. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 22. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under 27-53 Resolution No. U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 6 o ~ ,~~s== grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection. Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $3,540.00 minimum $ 6% of Site Improvement Cost or $2,060A0 minimum $ 2,000.00 $ 2,092.79 $3,515.00 g. Park Fees: N/ A h. Street Tree By Developer ** Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100 % of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council: However, the fees imposed herein maybe modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 23. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equiprrient enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping ox located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 24. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 27-54 Resolution No. U-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 7 25. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The applicant shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 26. NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES} CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 27. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REQUIREMENTS The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMP's are required. 28. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include alI erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 29. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS The developer shall install traffic signal improvements at the Stevens Creek Blvd/Mary intersection. The improvements include installing new pedestrian signal heads, pedestrian push buttons, emergency vehicle pre-ernption equipment, repainting traffic signal heads and installing new poles, framework and signal heads on the east median and the southwest corner. The eastbound left-turn pocket shall be lengthened as directed by the City Engineer. 30. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for alI vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City. has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic .Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 27 - 55 Resolution No. U-2007-04 ~ June 10, 2008 Page 8 31. TRASH ENCLQSURES The trash enclosure plan shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Envirorunental Programs Manager. 32. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obfain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 66474.18 of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices /sfRalph Qualls Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 22046 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10~ day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Steve Piasecki, Director Community Development Department APPROVED: Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission G: lPlanninglPDR~'PORTIRESI20071 U-1007-04 res.doc 27-56 ASA-2007-06 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, Cali#ornia 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A 4-STORY, 122-ROOM HOTEL AND A 3-STORY, 56,194 SQUARE- FOOT MIXED USE RETAIL/COMMERCIAL OFFICE/MEETING & CONFERENCE CENTER BUILDIN G OVER AN UNDERGROUND PARKING PODIUM AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD (OAKS SHOPPING CENTER) SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; and 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of the Architectural and Site Review Chapter of the Cupertino Municipal Code; and 3) The proposed development is essentially consistent with the Heart of the City Specific Plan, except for the exception request fora 15-foot sideyard setback from the westerly property line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE TI' RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Architectural and Site Approval is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. ASA-2007-06 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 27-57 Resolution No. ASA-2007-06 ~ June 10, 2008 Page 2 SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: ASA-2007-Ob Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMII~TISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on Exhibits titled: "The Oaks Mixed -Use Project, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 47 pages labeled pages DR-1 through DR-9, DR-2.1, DR-3.1, SD-1, SD-2, CS-1, A-1 through A-4, SHT 1, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, TM-1 through TM-4, Condo Plan: C-1 and C-2, C-3 Compliance C-1, L1 through L-5, EXB-1 and two colored renderings of the project, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to construct a 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 56,194 square-foot mixed use building over a parking podium. For the 3-story, mixed- use building the first and second floors shall be devoted to general commercial uses as defined in the City's "CG" zoning district. The third floor shall be limited to meeting, banquet, party and conference uses, with late evening activities, subject to City use permit approval. All tenants and customers of said buildings shall have access to parking spaces in the underground parking podium. 3. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION The applicant shall receive a Heart of the City Area commercial development allocation of 74,964 square feet that reflects the construction of a 122-room hotel and a 56,194 square-foot mixed use building. The building axea of the hotel, 61,822 square feet, has been discounted to 18,770 square feet of general commercial allocation based on a peak hour traffic trip equivalency. 4. PROJECT PHASING For building permit purposes, the applicant may phase the construction of the hotel, mixed-use building and their site improvements in two phases as described in the approved exhibits (see condition #1), except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 5. BICYCLE PARKING The applicant shall provide bicycle parking facilities for the proposed development in accordance with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.100 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 27-58 Resolution No. ~ ASA-2007-06 June 10, 200$ Page 3 6. LANDSCAPE PLAN . The applicant shall submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The landscape plan shall pxovide the following: 1. The landscape plan shall include water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with Chapter 14.15, Xeriscape Landscaping, and the pesticide control measures referenced in Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Cade. 2. Full Heart of the City Specific Plan landscape and sidewalk (paver} improvements between Mary Avenue and the row of parking fronting on Stevens Creek Boulevard; and a modified Heart of the City landscape improvement along the parking row to the westerly driveway, consisting of a paver sidewalk and planting areas between the existing trees similar in design to the Stevens Creek Boulevard sidewalk design on the north side of the street east of Stelling Road. 3. Native trees substituted for the proposed replacement trees where appropriate and feasible. The revised landscape plan shall include the locations of two field-grown native oak trees that will xeplace two large specimen oaks that were previously removed due to hazardous conditions. 4. Mary Avenue landscape improvements fronting the pool and half sport court shall be deleted. Mary Avenue on-street parking removal due to landscape improvements and driveway cuts shall be up to 36 parking stalls. Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining these Mary Avenue street trees. 7. MASTER USE PERMIT (FILE NO. 20-U-86) MODIFICATION OF CONDITION N0.3 The conditions of approval of the master use permit for the Oaks Shopping Center (file rio. 20-U-$6) are incorporated by reference into this use permit. Condition #3 (Use Limitation} is hereby modified to reduce the maximum number of allowed restaurant seats from 800 to 500 to reflect the reduced shared parking supply proposed by this development application. 8. GREEN BUILDING At the building permit stage, the applicant shall qualify the new building{s) to achieve a LEED Silver designation. 9. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The applicant shall record a maintenance agreement subject to the approval of the City Attorney for the maintenance of the shared driveways by the property owners of each of the lots. 27 - 59 Resolution No. ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 4 10. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. il. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and othex exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a}, has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 12. BUILDING MATERIALS AND ARCHITECTURE Applicant shall revise the hotel architectural plans to substantially comply with the re-design recommendations of City Architect, Larry Cannon, detailed in a May 30, 2008 email message to staff, and include: matching roof tiles; mortared roof ridges; inset windows (minimum of 4 inches); awnings; balconies; eave brackets; and masonry accents on major, first floor building elements, including the lobby entrance. Revised plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council with a recommendation from~the Planning Commission. 13. PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS FOR HIGHWAY 85 BRIDGE Applicant shall contribute $100,000 toward the improvement of the pedestrian connections on the abutting bridge crossing over Highway 85. Said funding shall help fund safety railings, pedestrian-scaled lighting, permanently marked bicycle lanes, etc. on the bridge. 14. PUBLIC ART The applicant shall provide public art in accordance with General Plan policy 2- 66. Public art selection will be reviewed by the Fine Arts Commission. SECTION ]V: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 15. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. z~ - so Resolution No. ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 5 16. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 17. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 18. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 19. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 20. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Cify Engineer. Pre- and post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 21. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 22. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $3,540.00 minimum 27-61 Resolution No. ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 6 b. Grading Permit: $ 6% of Site Improvement Cost or $2,060.00 minimum c. Development Maintenance Deposit: $ 2,000.00 d. Storm Drainage Fee: $ 2,092.79 . e. Power Cost: ~'~ f. Map Checking Fees: $3,515.00 g. Park Fees: N/ A h. Street Tree By Developer ** Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: a. Faithful Pexformance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100 % of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 23. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 24. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 25. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The applicant shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. z~ - s2 Resolution No. ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 7 26. NATIONAL POLLUTANT .DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOT) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices {BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 27. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES {BMP) REQUIREMENTS The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMP's are required. 28. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 29. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS The developer shall install traffic signal improvements at the Stevens Creek Blvd/Mary intersection. The improvements include installing new pedestrian signal heads, pedestrian push buttons, emergency vehicle pre-emption equipment, repainting traffic signal heads and installing new poles, framework and signal heads on the east median and the southwest corner. The eastbound left-turn pocket shall be lengthened as directed by the City Engineer. 30. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for workrn the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD} standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 31. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. 27 - 63 Resolution No. ASA-2007-06 June 10, 2008 Page 8 32. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Prograrns Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS {Section 66474.18 of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices /s/Ralph Qualls Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 22046 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10~ day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Steve Piasecki, Director Community Development Department APPROVED: Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission G: lPlanninglPDREPOR71RES12007L4SA-2007-06 res.doc 27-64 EXC-2008-07 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN EXCEPTION TO THE HEART OF THE CITY SPECIFIC PLAN FORA 15-FOOT SIDE. YARD SETBACK ON A HOTEL AND MIXED USE BUILDING AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: EXC-2008-07 Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a setback exception to the Heart of the City Specific PIan, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the following with regards to this application: a) That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this chapter will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title; b) That the granting of the exception will not be injurious to property or improvements in the area nor be detrimental to the pubic safety, health and welfare; and c) That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification and the minimum variance to accomplish this purpose; and d) That .the proposed exception will not result in significant impacts to neighboring properties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the exception to the Heart of the City Specific Plan setback regulation is hereby recommended for approval subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution; and 27 - 65 Resolution No. ~ EXC-2008-07 June 10, 2008 Page 2 That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application EXC-2008-07, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 10, 2008 and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on Exhibits titled: "The Oaks Mixed -Use Project, Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 47 pages labeled pages DR-1 through DR-9, DR-2.1, DR-3.1, SD-1, SD-2, CS-1, A-1 through A-4, SHT 1, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, Phase 1: C-1 through C-8, TM-1 through TM-4, Condo Plan: C-1 and C-2, C-3 Compliance C-1, L1 through L-5, and two colored renderings of the project, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. HEART OF THE CITY SETBACK EXCEPTION Approval is granted for a side yard setback exception from the Heart of the City Specific PIan requirements to allow the proposed hotel and mixed use building to have a minimum 15 foot setback from the westerly property line. 3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be Legally barred from later challenging such exactions. z~. - ss Resolution No. ~ EXC-2008-07 June 10, 2008 Page 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Steve Piasecki Marty Miller, Chair Director of Community Development Planning Commission G: CupNT/P lanning/Pdreport/Res/2008BXC-2008-07. doc 27 - 67 TM-ZOOS-a9 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California ~ 95014 RESOLUTION NO OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING: APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE AN 8.1 NET ACRE SITE INTO TWO PARCELS, APPROXIMATELY 2.6 AND 5.5 ACRES IN SIZE, AND DENIAL OF A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION PLAN TO FURTHER SUBDIVIDE THE 2.6 ACRE LOT INTO FOUR CONDOMINIUM UNFTS AND A COMMON AREA LOT. SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City o£ Cupertino received ~an application for a Tentative Parcel Map, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support the two-lot subdivision portion of said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) That the proposed two-lot subdivision reap is consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan 2) That the design and improvements of the proposed two-lot subdivision are consistent with the General Plan. 3) That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of development contemplated under the approved subdivision. 4} That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and unavoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 5} That the design of the two-lot subdivision or the type of improvements associated there is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6} That the design of the subdivision and its associated improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, the Commission does not support the further subdivision of Parcel 1 (2.6 acres) into four commercial condominium units and a common area parcel in that the condominium plan would likely hamper all future redevelopment opportunities on the properties that may be of interest to the City. 2~ - se Resolution No TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Tentative Parcel Map is hereby partially recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. TM-2007-09 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 27, 2008 and June 10, 2008, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TM-2007-09 Applicant/Owner: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION lII: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on the Tentative Parcel Map titled: "Cupertino Oaks Tentative Map", consisting of four sheets labeled TM-1 through TM-4, prepared by BKF Engineers dated 4/ 14/ 08. The phrase: "(FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES) is stricken from Sheet TM-2, except as may be modified by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials will be recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICA'TIONS~RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Pxoject Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and othex exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 27 - 69 Resolution No TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 3 3. RECORDATION OF EASEMENTS The applicant shall depict on the final subdivision map to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and the Director of Public Works, easements for all shared utility lines, and surface storm drainage, parking, waste collection and vehicular circulation that crosses property lines. 4. CONDOMINIUM SUBDNISION PLAN The condominium subdivision plan depicted in Condo Plan Sheets labeled C-1 and C-2 and referenced in Sheet TM-2 is not approved. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 5. STREET WIDENING Street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 6. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 7. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 8. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 9. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Arrny Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 10. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre- and post- development calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be installed. 2~-~0 Resolution No TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 4 11. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 12. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and 'inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $3,540.00 minimum $ 6 % of Site Improvement Cost or $2,060.00 minimum $ 2,OOt}.00 $ 2,092.79 f. Map Checking Fees: $3,515.00 g. Park Fees: N/ A h. Street Tree By Developer 'k"° Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100 % of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 27-71 Resolution No TM-2007-09 ~ June 10, 2008 Page s 13. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and Landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 14. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be'included in grading and street improvement plans. 15. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The applicant shall dedicate to the Gity all waterlines and appurtances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. 16. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must obtain a Notice of Intent {NOl) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP}, use of construction Best Management Practices {BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 17. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REQUIREMENTS The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment BMP's, which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMP's are required. 18. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 19. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS The developer shall install traffic signal improvements at the Stevens Creek Blvd/Mary intersection. The improvements include installing new pedestrian signal heads, pedestrian push buttons, emergency vehicle pre-emption equipment, repainting traffic signal heads and installing new poles, framework and signal heads on the east median and the southwest corner. The eastbound left-turn pocket shall be lengthened as directed by the City Engineer. z~ - ~2 Resolution No TM-2007-04 June 10, 2008 Page 6 20. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer . to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD} standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 21. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. 22. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 6b474.18 of the California Government Code} I hexeby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices /sf Ralph Qualls Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 22046 27-73 Resolution No TM-2007-09 June 10, 2008 Page 7 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10~ day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Steve Piasecki, Director Community Development Department APPROVED: Marty Miller, Chair Planning Commission G: lPlanninglPDReportlResl2007tTM-2007-09. doc 27 - 74 TR-2008-02 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TREE REMOVAL REQUEST TO REMOVE AND REPLACE APPROXIMATELY 47 TREES TO CONSTRUCT A HOTEL AND MIXED USE BUILDING AT 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TR-2008-02 Applicant: Karen Ngo Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for the removal and replacement of about 47 trees in conjunction with the development of a hotel and mixed-use building; and WHEREAS, the 47 trees are part of an approved landscape plan, subject to Chapter 14.18 of the Municipal Code, pertaining to Heritage and Specimen Trees; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for tree removal is hereby recommended for approval; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application TR-2008-02, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of May 27, 2008 and June 10, 200$ are incorporated by reference herein. 27-75 Resolution No. - TR-2008-02 June 10, 2008 Page 2 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINLSTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVAL ACTION The applicant is approved to remove a total of about 47 trees on site in accordance with the applicant's tree survey/removal plan identified as pages L-1 through L-5 dated either 4/15/0$ or 4/17/08 in the approved plan set titled: "The Oaks Mixed- Use Project, Hyway 85 & Stevens Creek Blvd., Cupertino, CA", except as may be amended by the conditions of this Resolution. 2. TREE PROTECTION The City Arborist's recommendations for site design and tree protection during project construction as articulated in his July 24, 2007 report titled: A Tree Inventory and Review of the Proposed Development at the Oaks Shopping Center 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California' shall be incorporated in the building permit plan set and implemented during the course of demolition and construction of the project. 3. TREE PROTECTION BOND The applicant shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $100,000 to ensure protection of trees slated for preservation prior to issuance of grading, demolition or building permits. The bond shall be returned after completion of construction, subject to a letter from the City Arborist indicating that the trees are in good condition. 4. TREE REPLACEMENTS The applicant shall prepare a revised landscape plan at the building permit stage, substituting native trees for the proposed replacement trees where appropriate and feasible. That revised Landscape plan shall include the locations of two field-grown native oak trees that will replace two large specimen oaks that were previously removed due to hazardous conditions. The revised plan shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. For any additional trees that are removed due to hazardous conditions or are considered dead, the applicant shall be required to replace these trees in accordance with the Protected Trees Ordinance. Species and size of replacement trees shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department. 5. TREE REPLACEMENT IN-LIEU FEE The applicant shall pay an in-lieu fee for any trees that cannot be replaced on site in accordance with the City's Protected Trees Ordinance. 6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written noti~~ a~ Resolution No. TR-200$-02 June 10, 2008 Page 3 a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 6b020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of June 2008, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development APPROVED: Marty Miller, Chair Cupertino Planning Commission G: ~ Planning ~ PDREPORT~ RES ~ 2007 ~ TR-2008-02res.doc 27-77 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 ---- ' DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, Agenda Date: May 27, 2008 EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06 Applicant : Karen Ngo, Sand Hill Properties Owner: Modena Investment LP & Sunnyvale Holding LLC Property Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard (Oaks Shopping Center) APPLICATION SUMMARY: USE PERMIT and ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL {file nos. U-2007-04 and ASA-2007-06} to demolish a theater and 2,430 square feet of commercial space and construct a 4-story, 122-room hotel; a 3-story, 56,200 square-foot mixed use retail/office/conference center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements in two development phases at an existing shopping center. EXCEPTION (file no. EXC-2008-07) to the Heart of the City Specific Plan to reduce one side yard setback to 15 feet for a proposed 4-story, 122-room hotel and a 3-story, 56,200 square-foot mixed use retail/office/conference center building at an existing shopping center. TENTATIVE MAP (TM-2007-09) to subdivide an 8.1 net acre parcel into two parcels of 3.0 acres and 5.1 acres in size, with one parcel to be further subdivided into four commercial condominium units and a common area lot. TREE REMOVAL (TR-2008-02) request to remove and replace approximately 47 trees that are part of an approved landscape plan for an existing shopping center. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the project, provide direction to staff and continue the project for 30 days to give the applicant sufficient time to address City concerns including: 1) Modify or eliminate the commercial condominium subdivision to address building/fire code issues; 2) Modify landscape and improvement plans to depict Stevens Creek Boulevard Heart of the City Specific Plan landscape improvements or a satisfactory modification; 3) Eliminate development phasing, and commit to building the two buildings at the same time, or shift hotel project to Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage; and 4) Re-refer architectural plans to City Architect, Larry Cannon, for recommendations to significantly enhance the architectural detailing and 27 - 78 Use Permit, ASA, Tentati~ :_~~vlap, Exception, Tree Removal for 212L". Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 May 27, 2008 Paee 2 of 8 ___... building finishes of the hotel to be comparable with the planned mixed-use building. Project Data: General Plan Designation: Specific Plan: Zoning Designation: Acreage (Net): Building Area: Commercial/ Residential Heart of the City Specific Plan P- Stevens Creek Boulevard Conceptual Planned Development Zoning 8.1 acres Existing Shopping Center: 73,056 sq. ft. Demo Theater (Phase 1}: -15,263 sq. ft. Demo Comm'1 Space (Phase 2): - 2,430 sq. ft. 122-Room Hotel (Phase 1): 61,822 sq. ft. Mixed-Use Bldg. (Phase 2): 56,194 sq. ft. Building Height: Max. Proposed Bldg. Height (Hotel) 44' 10" General Plan Maximum Height is 45 feet Stories: Hotel: 4 stories; Mixed-Use Bldg: 3 stories Parking. Shared Parking Required (Phase 1): 356 stalls Parking Supply (Phase 1): 494 stalls Shared Parking Required (Phase 2): 417 stalls Parking Supply (Phase 2): 470 stalls on-grade garage podium 410 84 305 165 Zoning: Yes Project Consistency with: General Plan: Yes Environmen#a1 Assessment: Negative Declaration BACKGROUND: SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is located on the west side of the Oaks Shopping Center where there is a parking lot, a vacant theater and an occupied commercial space. It is bordered on the west by the Highway 85 on-ramp, an apartment complex to the north across Mary Avenue, the shopping center to the east, and De Anna Community College to the south across Stevens Creek Boulevard. PROJECT DESCRII'TTON: The applicant Karen Ngo, of Sand Hill Properties, is representing the property owner Modena Investment LP & Sunnyvale Holding LLC, the owners of the Oak Shopping Center. The project is split into two development phases by the applicant. The first phase involves the demolition of the vacant theater building and the construction of a 122-room, 4-story hotel over a parking podium at the northwest corner of the property with some site improvements. z~ - ~s Use Permit, ASA, Tentati~. ~.`ivlap, Exception, Tree Removal for 212i,<; Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 May 27, 2008 Page 3 of 8 The second phase involves the demolition of a portion of a commercial building {2,430 square feet) and the development of a 3-story, mixed-use building with retail commercial uses on the ground floor, commercial office uses on the second floor and a conference center on the third floor, over a parking podium at the southwest corner of the property. The applicant proposes to acquire the subdivided hotel lot and construct the hotel in Phase 1. Phase 2 would not be built until the retail environment improves sufficiently to make this building economically feasible. Site improvements have been phased to ensuxe the continuity of the vehicular circulation and the adequacy of the parking facilities for the existing shopping center tenants and the proposed hotel between the first and second development phases. DISCUSSION: General Plan Development Allocation: There is no separate, dedicated allocation of hotel rooms in the "Heart of the City" commercial center. Since the hotel is considered a commercial use. The square footage can be allocated from the Heart of the City commercial allocation. This also applies to the mixed-use building {retail commercial/commercial office/conference center), where all uses are commercial. The total net development allocation will be approximately 100,323 square feet (subtracting the demolished building areas), leaving a general plan development allocation balance of 124,967 square feet. The Planning Commission may wish to consider a reduced commercial development allocation for the hotel since hotels generate far fewer peak hour trips than the standard commercial building and are very unlikely to be converted to a more intensive use. The City Council took such an action in its approval of a new Public Storage facility, which was approved for an additional net new 101,363 square feet of warehousing. The office/industrial development allocation assigned to the Public Storage application was just 10,000 square feet. Staff estimates the commercial allocation for a hotel project could be reduced to 18,770 square feet based on equivalent peak hour traffic generation. . Traffic & Circulation: A transportation impact analysis was prepared for this project by Republic ITS under contract with the City (Exhibit A). The study evaluated all signalized intersections on Stevens Creek Boulevard between Bubb Road and Bandley Drive, and the intersections at N. Stelling Road and Greenleaf Drive, and S. Stelling Road and McClellan Road. The study took into account existing traffic levels, project traffic generation and traffic generation from projects that have been approved but not built yet. z~ - ao Use Permit, ASA, Tentati~: iVlap, Exception, Tree Removal for 212~~"5tevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 May 27; 2008 Page 4 of 8 The analyzed project was slightly larger than the proposed project, so the results may be slightly overstated. The study found no significant impacts on freeway operations. All studied intersections continued to operate at traffic level of service (LOS) D or better at peak hours, except Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Rd., which was already at E+ LOS during the evening peak. The project contributed an insignificant degradation to the LOS of this intersection. The study identified one needed operational improvement to the street. The study recommended that the left turn pocket on Stevens Creek Boulevard at Mary Avenue be extended from 200 to 300 feet with an increase in green signal time for the turning movement. The Public Works Department identified parking lot circulation improvements that are proposed in the Phase 2 work. They include reconfigured or widen driveways and re- angled parking stalls. Parking: Since 1973, the City has allowed, through the use permit process, for the Oaks Shopping Center to function with a parking deficit of 93 spaces. Overflow of center parking has been a concern, but not an issue because of the shared parking lot, the mixture of commercial tenants with different peak parking demands, and the presence of convenient, on-street Mary Avenue parking. In addition, a numbex of parking intensive uses were replaced with Iess parking intensive tenants (e.g. The Shane Company, a jewelry store, replaced the Pacific Fresh Restaurant). The applicant is proposing a parking plan of both below grade and surface parking stalls to meet the full parking amount required by City ordinance under Table 19.100.040-C, which takes into account the sharing of parking for mixed-use developments with common parking lots. Oaks Center Development: Aggregated Parking Data' Phase Existing New Use Shared Total Parking Parking Demand Parking Parking Supply Supply Re t. Su 1 Gara a At Grade 1 288 stalls 122 otel 356 stalls 494 84 410 2 387 stalls+ 147 (mixed 417 stalls 470 165 305 use * Empty tenant spaces are assumed to be parked at the general commercial ratio - one stall per 250 gross square feet . + Assumes hotel is built and occupied before Phase 2 commences. 27-81 Use Permit, ASA, Tentative Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 212i~;; Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 May 27, 2008 Pa e5of8 Based on the data above, an oversupply of 138 parking spaces is proposed in Phase 1, which diminishes to 53 parking spaces at the end of Phase 2. Note that the plans show the conversion of about 48 on-street Mary Avenue parking stalls to landscaping or driveway cuts (See Street improvement Discussion). These spaces are not needed by the proposed project. The conversion increases the building setback and landscaping from the curb, which significantly enhances the planned hotel development. Also, unlike the existing situation, where all of the shopping center parking is available to all customers and employees, the applicant is planning to restrict the underground parking garage to employees and guests of the hotel and new mixed use building. Even though there is adequate parking for the uses, there will be less shared parking supply when peak parking demand fluctuates among the different uses. Staff feels it would be prudent to modify the shopping center use permit (file no. 20-U-86), condition no. 3 which allows the center to have a maximum of 800 restaurant seats without need for use permit review. Currently the shopping center has 310 restaurant seats. Staff proposes dropping the number to a maximum of 500 restaurant seats, which allows fox current businesses and growth. Subdivision: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 8.1 acre property into two lots for the purposes of buying the hotel lot and developing the hotel immediately. This lot, Parcel 1, is proposed to be subdivided further into four commercial condominium lots and a common area parcel. The condominium plan provides for two above ground Iots that would conform to the building envelopes of the hotel and mixed use building, and two underground Iots that conform to the envelopes of the below-grade parking structure. Staff has no issue with the two-lot split, but the condominium plan as presented introduces building code/property line issues that render construction infeasible. The tentative map application needs to be continued to give the applicant time to rethink the subdivision concept and address building/fire code issues. Subdivision Easements: Where utility lines, storm drainage, vehicular movements and parking cross proposed property lines, easements should be recorded. These needed easements are not shown on the tentative map. A condition will be placed in the tentative map resolution to record such easements on the final subdivision map after building/fire code issues are addressed. 27-82 Use Permit, ASA, Tentative Map, Facception, Tree Removal for 212ti,: Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-200&07, TR-2008-02 May 27, 2008 Page 6 of 8 ,^. Street Improvements: Stevens Creek Boulevard-Heart of the City Landscape lm-provements. The Heart of the City Specific Plan requires landscape and sidewalk improvements along Stevens Creek Boulevard when site redevelopment increases building square footage by 25% or more, as is the case with the proposed project. The ideal improvement called out by the specific plan is a 10-foot wide curbside landscape strip, a six-foot wide sidewalk, follow by another 10-foot wide landscape strip. Along retail street frontages, a single row of street trees is required. Site conditions vary along the Oaks Shopping Center Stevens Creek Boulevard street frontage. Where current site conditions prohibit the ideal street improvement, the specific plan allows a modified, transitional improvement until such time the full improvements can be executed. The applicant has declined to install such landscape improvements across the majority of the Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage. On plan set sheet TM-3, the ideal landscape improvement is depicted between the eastern driveway and Mary Avenue. This improvement could be extended westerly past the Iarge oak tree, but this improvement extension was not offered by the applicant. The western reach between the western driveway and the Highway 85 on-ramp cannot be improved. Right-of-way modifications are under the jurisdiction of CALTRANS, which has numerous traffic improvements in this area. The agency would be unlikely to allow any new trees that might obscure motorist views or sidewalk modifications in proximity to its traffic control infrastructure. The majority of the Stevens Creek street frontage consists of a narrow sidewalk/landscape strip between the curb and parking row. This width is too narrow to accommodate the ideal 26-foot wide landscape improvement, but a modified transitional improvement is possible. Staff recommends an undulating sidewalk pattern where tree wells are cut into the existing monolithic sidewalk and new sections of sidewalk are constructed between the existing trees. Staff will present a graphic of this concept at the hearing to demonstrate how this would work. Staff suggested such a landscape improvement to the applicant who declined to provide it. Mary Avenue Street/Landscape Improvements. Staff is concerned with the visual mass of the hotel, which would be setback a minimum of 20 feet+ from the property Iine. The applicant is proposing the conversion of about 48 street parking stalls on Mary Avenue to a landscape area. The purpose is to soften the appearance of the hotel from Mary Avenue by visually increasing its setback from the street and increasing the landscape quantities. The Public Works Department does not have any issues with the conversion of the parking stalls to landscaped area. 27 - 83 Use Permit, ASA, Tentative' Map, Exception, Tree Removal for 212b:; Stevens Creek Blvd U-2(?07-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 May 27, 2008 Pale 7 of 9 Highway 85 Bridge Improvements. Any development approval should be conditioned with a financial contribution toward Highway 85 bridge improvements on one side-a minimum of pedestrian railings and lights. The previous applicant for a development on the site, Regis Homes, agreed to contribute $100,000. Trees: An aborist report was prepared by City Arborist, David Babby (Exhibit B), to identify existing trees in proximity to the development. The applicant is proposing the removal of 47 trees and replacing them with 67 trees to mitigate that loss. The City Arborist reviewed an earlier development plan that call fox more tree removal. Plans were subsequently revised, which reduced the tree removal request to 47 trees of nine different species in the project vicinity (See Sheet L1 of plan set). None of the signature Coast Live Oak Trees on the property are proposed for removal. The composition of trees in the tree removal request are as follows: 10 Monterey Pines, 12" - 23" in diameter 1 Eucalyptus 13.5" in diameter 1 Raywood Ash 12.5" in diameter 15 Shamel Ash, 4"- 25" in diameter 1 Pittosporum, 6" - 8" in diameter cluster 1 Tree of Heaven, 2" - 4" in diameter cluster 1 Holly Oak 13.5" diameter 15 Chinese Pistache, 4" - 20.5" in diameter 2 Evergreen Pear, 8.5" -11.5" in diameter 47 Total Proposed for Removal Staff's objectives were first to preserve the native oak trees, then as many of the larger trees on the western property line where they could serve as an effective visual screen for the two buildings. Unfortunately, many of these trees are Monterey Pines in poox health. There were two major oaks that were removed because death and a hazardous condition, but not yet replaced. Both should be replaced with field grown oaks. Site Design, Setback & Architecture: The new buildings have been integrated into the design of the center with the building frontages addressing the rest of the shopping center. The westerly driveway runs along the east side of the buildings. The mixed use building serves as the terminus of the east-west pedestrian paseo, which has been widen to conform to the width of the rest of the paseo. With the new developments, a new north-south pedestrian walkway will be created, connecting Mary Avenue and Stevens Creek Boulevard. The number of z~-aa Use Permit, ASA, Tentative 1VIap, Exception, Tree Removal for 212b Stevens Creek Blvd U-2Q07-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 May 27, 2008 Page 8 of 9 driveways were limited and connected to the proposed hotel. A joint service yard area is proposed to serve both buildings. An exception is proposed for the sideyard setback facing the Highway 85 on-ramp. Fifteen #eet is proposed where 18 feet is required (half of the building wall height}. A reduction in side setback here would not have any impacts and the proposed 15 feet is wide enough to protect the existing west boundary trees. The architecture of the mixed use building is satisfactory to staff; however, more should be done with the hotel. The building articulation is fine, but more can be done with the building finishes and architectural detailing to enhance the appearance of the building. This building will be highly visible with a sweeping vista from both Mary Avenue and Highway 280. Staff recommends that the plans be re-referred to the City Architect, Larry Cannon, for additional design details. Development Phasing: Staff is concerned that if the development of this project is phased, the second phase mixed use building will likely not be built, leaving a "hole" in the development pattern of the shopping center. The previously identified building code/property line issues, differing property ownerships, the rising cost of site and street improvements could hinder Phase 2 development. Staff does not support the development phasing request. If the Commission feels differently, staff recommends that the buildings be flipped with the first phase hotel shifted toward the Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage. Staff feels the development of the Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage should be prioritized to frame the street, provide a gateway building for the Heart of the City and stimulate economic activity in the shopping center and along the boulevard. Public Noticing/Comments: Mailed noticing for the public hearing was a 1/z mile radius. In addition, staff was interviewed for a news article about the project that appeared in the Cupertino Courier. Two emails commenting on the project are attached (Exhibit C}. ENCLOSURES: Model Resolutions Initial Study, ERC Minutes, ERC Recommendation Exhibit A: Traffic Impact Analysis Letter Report: Proposed Redevelopment of the the Oaks, Cupertino, dated October 18, 2007 by Republic ITS Exhibit B: A Tree Inventory and Review of the Proposed Development at the Oaks Shoppvng Center, 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California dated July 24, 2007 by Arbor Resources Exhibit C: Emailed public comments Plan Set 27-85 Use Permit, ASA, Tentative ivlap, Exception, Tree Removal for 212r,,.'Stevens Creek Blvd U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 May 27, 2008 Page 9 of 9 Submitted by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner --., Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Directox of Community Developme t '= - - ~- G: Planning/PDReport/pcUreports/2007ureports/ U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 pc.doc 27-as CUPERTiNO PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Project Project ,~. o-~= r-*~MerC~ 56,1 ~'(~} S:~ , ~0.y~ Urc+~2: r~v~o ~~'~ V i~hw PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ~ . Site Area ac.) - ~ ° ~ - Building Coverage - 2~+ ~,_% Exist. Building - f. roposed Bldg. - ~6 0 s.f. Zone - Q G.P. Designation -~.~G~ C,Q~~ ~eS I ~w~~ Assessor's Parcei No. - ~- `'~-~7 _~.~ If Residentiai, UnitslGross Acre - ~) ~ 1g Unit Type #1 Unit Type #2 Unit Type #3 Unit Type.#4 Unit Type #5 Total# RentallOwn Bdrms Total s.f. Price Applicable Special Area Plans: {Check) ^ Monta Vista Design Guidelines ^ ^ N. De Anza Conceptual ^ j~j~ Steven Crk Blv . Conceptuair \~, ~ ~I~~ if Non-Residential, Building Area - s. Employees/Shift - Parking Required ' ~- ~ti~ Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area - S. De Anza Conceptual S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual Stevens Creek Stvd. SW 8~ Landscape f. FAR - ~s ~~Max. N/l3 s~~ Parking Provided is YES ~ ~"NO ^ City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3251 FAX (408) 777-3333 elooment Deaartment _ ~~- z ~ :ti File No, EA --2Gt~ e File No.~-2r~~~4 /~~} 2DU~ -barra~ ttachments ~TM~Zoo ; -~- ~~?.~o~-ts / ray 0' z7-s~ A. CUPERT{NO GENERAL Pl_AN SOURCES 1. Land Use Element 2. Public Safety Element 3. Housing Element 4. Transportatbn Element 5. Environmental Resources 6. Appendix A Hillside Development 7. Land Use Map 8. Noise Element Amendment 9. City Ridgeiine Policy 10. Constraint Maps B. CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS 11. Tree Preservation ordinance 778 12. C'sty Aerial Photography Maps 13. "Cupertino Chronicle" {California History Center, 1976) 14. Geological Report (site specific) 15. Parking Ordinance 1277 16. Zoning Map 17. Zoning CodeJSpecfic Plan Documents 18. City Noise Ordnance C. CITY AGENCIES Site 19. Community Development Dept. List 20. Public Works Dept. 21. Parks & Recreation Department 22. Cupertino Water Utility D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 23. County Planning Department 24. Adjacent Cities' Planning Departments 25. County Departmental of Environmental Health D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES (Continued) 26. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 27. County Parks and Recreation Department 28. Cupertino Sanitary District 29. Fremont Union High School District 30. Cupertino Union School District 31. Paafic Gas and Electric 32. Santa Clara County Fire Department 33. County Sheriff 34. CALTRANS 35. County Transportation Agency 36. Santa Clara Valley Water District E. OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS 37.. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant Excesses 38. FEMA Flood MapsISCVWD Flood Maps 39. USDA, "Soils of Santa Clara County" 40. County Hazardous Waste Management Plan 41. County Heritage Resources inventory 42. Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel Leak Site 43. CaIEPA Hazardous Waste and Substances Site F. OTHER SOURCES 44. Project Plan SetlApplication Materials 45. Field Reconnaissance 46. Experience wlproject of similar scopelcharacteristics 47. ABAG Projection Series A. Complete all information requested on the Initial Study Cover page. LEAVE BLANK SPACES ONLY WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM !S NOT APPLICABLE. B. Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete, the checklist information in Categories A through O. C. You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s) in the "Source" column next to the question to which they relate. D. If you check any of the "YES° response to any questions, you must attach a sheet explaining the potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed. E. When explaining any yes response, label your answer clearly (Example "N - 3 HistoricaP') Please ttY to respond concisely, and place as many explanatory responses as possible on each page. F. Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the Preparer's Affidavit G. Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City. /Project Plan Set of Legislative Document /Location map with site clearly marked (when applicable) 27-88 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: >'b~ +~ ~ ~ o ro~ o o ~ ~ ~; ~c~a t H ~ g ISSUES: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •3 c- o e a ~ _ ~ p e o z ~ [and Supporting Information Sources] a a~ ~ rn = o ~ ~ ~ m a~._ v avs m c s .~ 1. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substan#ial adverse effect on a ^ ^ ^ scenic vista? [5,9,24,41,44] b} Substantially damage scenic resources, ^ ^ ^ ~. including, but not limited to, trees, rode outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? [5,9,11,24,34,41,44] c) Substantially degrade the existing visual ^ ^ ^ character or quality of the site and its ' surroundings? [1,17,19,44] d) Create a new source of substantial light or ^ ^ ^ ~ = glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? [1,.16,44] I1. AGRICULTURE RESdURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and _' Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model #o use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique ^ ^ ^ ~ Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? [5,7,39] ~b} Conflict with existing zoning for O ^ ^ ~ agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? [5,7,23] c) Involve other changes in the existing. ^ ^ ^~ ~ environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? j5,7,39) 27-89 ~~~ Tav ~ = o ~ ego O ~ tvt;~,L. ~ ~ e~a+~ rv~ '~ ISSUES: ]and Supporting Information Sources] mc~ a, ~ ~=3a~o m ~ = ~~E m o~_ z°~ o av~ ~ ~m ~ c min III: AIR QUALITY -Where available. the significance criteria established by the applicable air qualify management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would ' the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of ^ ^ ~ ^ the applicable air quality plan? [5,37,42,44] b) Violate any air quality standard or O ^ ~ ^ contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? [5,37,42,44) . . c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net ^ ^ ~ :.© . increase of any criteria pollutant for which • the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ~ • ozone precursors)? [4,37,44] ~ . d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial ^ ^ k4 ^ pollutant concentrations? ]4,37,44] ~ ~ ~{ e) Create objectionable odors affecting a ~ ^ ^ ~ ~ ;Q substantial number of people? [4,37,44] ~ • ~ ~' IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES --Would the project: ~ ~ ~=" a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either ^ ^ ^ ~. directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any ^ ^ ~ ^ ~. riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? ]5,10,27,44] c) Have a substantial adverse effect on ^ ^ ^ federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act includin ,but not limited to, marsh, vernal z~ - so • ~+ C ~ r ' ~" v~ ~ _ ' _ '~, ~ O t6 ~v !C4 ~ ~+ !0 R w R ISSUES: + + me e ~ io y~~m F.~ w~Q' ~ p z~ E [and Supporting Information Sources] a y J y g~ J y pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydro{ogical interruption, or other " means? [20,36,44] d) Interfere substantially with the movement ^ ^ - ~ of any native resident or migratory fish ar wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? [5,10,12,21,26] e) Conflict with any local policies or ~ ^ ^ ~, ^ ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ~ = ordinance? [11,12,41] ~ ' f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural ^ O ^ "- ~. Community Conservation Plan, or other ' approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? [5,10,26,27) V. CULTURAL RESOURCES --Would the ~ - project: " a) Cause a substantial adverse change in ^ ^ ~ ^ ~ ~~ the significance of a historical resource as . defined in §15064.5? [5,13,41] b) Cause a substantial adverse change in ^ ^ ^ • ~ ~ the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? [5,13,41] c} Directly ar indirectly destroy a unique ^ ^ ^ ~- paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? [5,13,41] d) Disturb any human remains, including ^ ^ ^ " ~ those interred outside of formal cemeteries? [1,~ VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ^ ^ ^ ^ delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake f=ault Zoning Map issued by the 27-91 >+~' _ C R v ~ 0 ~~' c~- C ° ~ -C y ~ ~, ~ cw ~ ~ r .= v f~ r.+ V ISSUES: i S ~~_`~ c ~ ~ ~~=`~° m ~ 3 ~ o ~~Q. B ~ c °a Z ~ ources] on [and Supporting Informat ~ ~ c ~ e avs - N rn State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. [2,14,44] ii} Strong seismic ground shaking? ^ ^ ~ ^ [2,5,10,44] iii} Seismic-related ground failure, including ^ ^ ^ liquefaction? [2,5,10,39,44] iv) Landslides? (2,5,10,39,44] ^ ^ ^ ~. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the O ^ ^ 18l loss of topsoil? (2,5,10,44] c) Be Iota#ed on a geologic unit or soil that is ^ ^ ^ ~.~.~ unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result ~ , in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, - subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (2,5,10,39] d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined ^ ^ ^ in Table 1$-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to fife or property? (2,5,10] e} Have soils incapable of adequately ^ ^ ^ - ~: supporting the use of septic tanks or . alternative waste water disposal systems . where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? [6,9,36,39] VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -Would the project: a} Create a signficant hazard to the public or ^ ~ ^ ^ Jul the environment through the rou#ine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? [32,40,42,43,44] b) Create a significant hazard to the public or ^ ^ ^ the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? [32,40,42,43,44] c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle ^ ^ ^ hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile 2~-sz C ~+ ~w~ ~ o f0 = ++ ~~r°~ !0 C t+ .c~~ ++ ~ ISSUES: ~ [and Supporting Information Sources] ~ ~ R c m ~ H ='= = m a m ~ ~ ~ o y ~ a m ~ ~ z° ~ E av~ ~vs ~ ~ -~vi of an existing or proposed school? [2,29,30,40,44] d) Be located on a site which is included on a ^ ^ ^ ~ list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? [2,42,40,43] e) For a project located within an airport land ^ ^ ^ ~, use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within fin-o miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private ^ ^ ^ ; airstrip, would the project result in a safety • hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] . g) Impair implementation of or physically ^ O ^ ~- interfere with an adapted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [2,32,33,44] h) Expose people or structures to a ^ ^ ^ significant risk of loss, injury or death . involving wildland fires, including where • wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?[1,2,44] VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY --Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or ^ ^ ^ waste discharge requirements? [2Q,36,37] b) Substantially deplete groundwater O ^ • ^ ,~ supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would 'not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? [20,36,42] 27 - 93 l4 V V c o t v~ y i L v V V iSSUES: ~:. R c ~ *a,; c ~ F- ,,,,, l0 O u, ~ °" rn c 3~-- o H-~ ~ Q- H.E E O R z Q- E [and Supporting information Sources] a° y J N ~ ~ J N _.. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage ^ ^ ^ pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, •in a manner which would result in substantial erosion of siltation on- or off-site? [14, 20,36] d) Substantiaily alter the existing drainage ^ ^ ^ :R( pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site [20,36,38] e) Create or contribute runoff water which ^ ^ ^ ~~ ' would exceed the capacity of existing or - planned stomiwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? [20,36,42] f) Otherwise substantially degrade water ^ ^ ^ ~(, quality? [20,36,371 ~ . g) Place housing within a 100-year flood ~^ ^ ^ hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary ar Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? [2 3s] . h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area ^ ^ ^ • '~. structures which would impede or redirect • flood flaws? [2,38] i) Expose people or structures to a significant ^ ^ ^ ~ risk of foss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? [2,36,38] j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or ^ ^ ^ ~l mudflow? [2,36,38] IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING -Would the project: a) Physically divide an established ^ ^ ^ community? (7,12,22,41 ] b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, O ^ ^ ~ policy, or regulation of an agency with 27-94 ~+ ~'' _ C is ~ ~j 0 C ~+ C °- ~ w t ~ ~ ~ C ~'' C t ~ V V ISSUES: S d C ~ y C 3~ Q o y C a E Z a ~ ources] [and Supporting Information o ~ d a~ :~ e ~ c ~ a~ av~ rn - -yin jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [1,7, 8,16,17,18,44] c) Conflict with any applicable habitat ^ . ^ 1~ , d conservation plan or natural community . conservation plan? [1,5,6,9,26] X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the ~~ project: ~ • a) Result in the loss of availability of a known ^ ~ ^ mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? [5,10] b} Result in the loss of availability of a ^ ^ ^ locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? [5,10] XI. NOISE --Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, ^ ^ ^ ~l noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other ~ - agencies? [8,18,44] b} Exposure of persons #o or generation of ^ ^ ^ ,~ excessive groundbome vibration or groundborne noise levels? [8,18,44] c) A substantial permanent increase in ^ ^ ^ ~ ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ,[8,1 8]. d) A substantial temporary or periodic ^ ^ ~ ^ increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? {8,18,44] e) For a project located within an airport land ^ ^ ^ use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted; within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residin or workin in the 27-95 ~+~ ~~'R c o ~~ oR o H~ ,~ ~~~ ~~~ +~ ~ ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] m ~ c m ~ ~~ ~ _ •3 ~ a m ~ ~ y ~ ~ a ~ ~ E c Z a ~ a ~ ~ vs ~ c -~ to project area to excessive noise levels? [8,18,44] f) For a project within the vicinity of-a private ^ ^ ^ airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (8,18] Xll. POPULATION AND HOUSING --Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an ^ ^ ^ }~ area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses} or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? [3,16,47,44] b) Displace substantial numbers of existing ^ ^ ^ - ~ - housing, necessitating the construcfion of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] c) Displace substantial numbers of people, ^ ^ ^ ~.~ nepessitating the construction of - replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES - a) Would the project result in substantial - adverse physical impacts associated with the • - . provision of new or physically altered ~ • - govemmentalfacilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other pertom~ance objectives for any of the public services: • Fire protection? [19,32,44] ^ ^ ^ Police protection? [33,44] ^ ^ ^ Schools? [29,30,44] ^ ^ ^ ~ Parks? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] ^ ^ ^ Other public facilities? [19,20,44] D ^ ^ ~ XN. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of ^ ^ ^ existin neighborhood and re Tonal arks or . 2~ - ss ~ +r ~ ~ C ~ 14 H- v ~ '''' O *+ {0 ~ v e~4 e~0 Z ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources) a~ic c as E ~c3m? ~ m . ~ N~a ~ m ~ a ~ G. d1 ~ V~ ~ c -j t/1 other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (5,17,19,21,26,27,44] b) Does the project include recreational ^ ^ ^ ~, facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? [5,44] XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: a} Cause an increase in traffic which is ^ ^ ~ ~^ substantial in refa#ion to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system {i.e., - result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? [4,20,35,44] b} Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, ^ ^ ~ ^ a level of service standard established by the ~• i•~ • •: county congestion management agency far ~~ designated roads or highways? [4,20,44] c} Result in a change in air traffic patterns, O ^ ^ - including either an increase in traffic levels or ' ~ . a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? [4,?] d) Substantially increase hazards due to a - ^. ^ ^ ' ~ design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses {e.g., farm equipment)? [20,35,44] e} Result in inadequate emergency access? ^~ ~ ^ ^ ~ [2,19,32,33,44] f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ^ ^ ^ 1~ I17~~] g) Conflict with adapted policies, plans, or ^ ^ ^ programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [4,34] XVI, UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: s~ - s~ ~ +.. `~~~ 0 ~ o ca sv~,;,~. eo ~. s~t~ t. v ISSUES: mc~ ~ ~c3~°' = yc°' ~ ZQ' ~ [and Supporting Information Sources] c ~ ~ m m ~ ~ a~ d y -~ to c .~ N a) Exceed wastewater treatment ^ ^ ^ requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? [5,22,28,36,44] b) Require or result in the construction of ^ G ^ new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [36,22,28,36] c) Require or result in the construction of O O ^ ;~ new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [5,22,28,36,44] ~ • e) Result in a determination by the ^ ^ ^ wastewater treatment provider which serves _ or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? [5,22,28,36,44] f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient ^ ^ ^ ;= ~l, permitted capacity to accommodate the - project's solid waste disposal needs? [?] g}Comply with federal, state, and local ^ ^ ^ statutes and regulations related to solid -.. waste? [?] z~ - s8 a) Does the project have the potential to O ^ ^ )~ degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ~ b) Does the project have impacts that are ^ ^ ^ ~ individually limited, but cumulatively . considerable? {"Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when ~ . viewed in connection wi#h the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, ~ - and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental ^ ^ ^ effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ~ I hereby certify that the information provided in this initial Study is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; I certify that 1 have used proper diligence in responding accurately to all questions herein, and have.consulted.sppropriate source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. I hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of such delay or discontinuance. Preparer's Signature Print Preparer's Name 2~ - ss ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant impact" as indicated by the checklist on the fallowing pages. O Aesthetics ^ Agriculture Resources ^ Air Quality ~ Biological Resources ^ Cultural Resources Geology !Soils ^ Hazards & Hazardous Materials ^ Hydrology /Water Quality ^ Land Use /Planning ^ Mineral Resources ^ Noise ^ Population /Housing ^ Public Services O Recreation ~ Transportation/Traffic ^ Utilities /Service Systems ^ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds that: The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ^ AI#hough the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there wi[I not be a sign cant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ^ The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. .O The proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentiapy . significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached shee#s. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the. effects that remain to be addressed. ^ Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Staff Evaluato ERC Chairperson ~ D Da ~` 3~ og Date 2~ - ~ 00 Initial Study Addendum For Oaks Shopping Center Mixed Use Building and Hotel Project File Nos. U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, EXC-2008-07, TM-2007-09, TR-2008-02 (EA-2007-06) Geology/Soils• Geotechnical investigation shows no unusual soil conditions that would warrant extraordinary foundation or construction techniques. Parkin: Phase Existing New Dev. Aggregated Shared Parking Supply Bus. Parking Parking Supply On Parking Regt grade/ garage R t. 1 288 122 410 356 494 410/84 2 387 147 534 417 470 305/165 Parking supplied is adequate for shopping center based on shared parking calculation in a mixed-use development. Trees• 47 trees proposed for removal. Project will have 67 tree replacements. AlI oak trees are preserved. Trees to be removed. 10 Monterey Pines 1 .Eucalyptus 1 Raywood Ash 15 Shamel Ash 1 Pitto sporum 1 Tree of Heaven 1 Holly Oak 15 Chinese Pistache 2 Evergreen Pear Traffic The proposal generates 178 vehicle trips during the morning commute and 355 trips during the evening pear period. This is a net increase in traffic of 168 morning peak hour trips and 252 evening peak hour trips. 27 - 101 Morning and evening LOS calculations indicate no degradation of LOS below acceptable general plan standards for all studied intersections. One intersection at Stevens Creek and Stelling Rd is already operating at LOS E and the project contributes an insignificant amount of traffic to that intersection. 27 - 102 Community Development ti, artment Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 ACTION MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING pF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE HELD ON Apri130, 2008 Committee Members: Kris Wang Dave Knapp Ralph Qualls Marty Miller Committee Members absent: Steve Piasecki Staff present: Colin Jung APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 23, 2008 ACTION: Approval of minutes from January 23, 2008 MOTION: Marty Miller SECOND: Ralph Qualls ABSTAIN: none VOTE: 4-0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 20, 2008 ACTION: Approval of minutes from February 20, 2008 MOTION: Marty Miller SECOND: Ralph Qualls ABSTAIN: none VOTE: 4-0 NEW ITEMS: 1. Application No.: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-Ob (EA-2007-06), TM-2007-09 EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 Applicant: Karen Ngo {T'he Oaks Shopping Center) Location: 212b5 Stevens Creek Blvd. Use Permit to demolish a theater and 2,430 square feet of commercial space and construct a 4- story, 122 room hotel, a 3-story 56,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements in two phases at an existing shopping center; Architectural and Site approval for a proposed 4-story, 122 room hotel, 3-story 5b,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements at an existing shopping center; Tentative Map to subdivide an 8.1 net acre parcel into 2 parcels of 3.0 and 5.1 acres in size, with one parcel to be further subdivided into four commercial condominium units and a common area lot; An Exception to the Heart of the City to reduce one side-yard setback to 15 feet for a proposed 4-story, 122 room hotel, a 3-story 56,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building; A Tree Removal request to remove and replace approximately 47 trees that are part of an approved landscape plan for an existing shopping center 27 - 103 ^ Noise o A noise study is not normally done with Hotel development applications ^ Geologic o No geologic/soils issues present ^ Trees ^ Traffic 0 47 trees are scheduled for removal. They are in the parking lot and building #ootprint area o No specimen or heritage trees will be removed 0 67 new trees will be planted around the site o The new traffic circulation pattern is an improvement over what exists at the site currently o The proposed development will correct an existing parking deficiency in the number of spaces. The first phase construction project will have 355 (shared) spaces and the second construction phase will add 470 {shared) spaces o The development is projected to generate 168 moxe am trips and 252 more pm trips during the commute period o No change in the LOS levels o No significant change in the signal wait times ^ Additional Discussion o Carbon emissions, solar systems should be considered in future discussions o Recycling of construction materials o Green Building practices ACTION: Recommendation for a Negative Declaration MOTION: Ralph Qualls SECOND: Dave Knapp NOES: none VOTE: 4-0 OLD BUSYNESS None Respectfully submitted, /s/Beth Ebben Beth Ebben Administrative Clerk G/planning/erc/appraaedmira~ tes043008 27-104 CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Apri130, 2008 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on Apri130, 2008. PROTECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application No.: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06 (EA-2007-06), TM-2007-09 EXC-2008-07, TR-208-02 Applicant: Karen Ngo (The Oaks Shopping Center) Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST Use Permit to demolish a theater and 2,430 square feet of commercial space and construct a 4- story, 122 room hotel, a 3-story 56,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements in two phases at an existing shopping center; Architectural and Site approval for a proposed 4-story, 122 room hotel, 3-story 56,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements afi an existing shopping center; Tentafive Map to subdivide an 8.1 net acre parcel into 2 parcels of 3.0 and 5.1 acres in size, with one parcel to be further subdivided into four commercial condominium units and a common area lot; An Exception to the Heart of the City to reduce one side-yard setback to 15 feet for a proposed 4-story, 122 room hotel, a 3-story 56,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building; A Tree Removal request to remove and replace approximately 47 trees that are part of an approved landscape plan for an existing shopping center FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and has no significant environmental impacts. /s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development g/erc/REC EA-2Q07-09 27 - 105 CITY OF CUPERTINO NEGATIVE DECLARATION As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27,1973, and amended on March 4,1974, January 171977, May 1, 1978, and July 7,1980, the following described project was granted a Negative Declaration by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on June 17, 2008 PROTECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application No.: U-2007-04, ASA-2007-0b (EA-2007-06), TM-2007-09 EXC-2008-07, TR-2008-02 Applicant: Karen Ngo (The Oaks Shopping Center) Location: 21265 Stevens Creek Blvd DISCRETIONARY ACTION RE VEST Use Permit to demolish a theater and 2,430 square feet of commercial space and construct a 4- story, 122 room hotel, a 3-story 56,194 square foot mixed use xetail/office/convention center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements in two phases at an existing shopping center; Architectural and Site approval for a proposed 4-story, 122 room hotel, 3--story 5b,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building over an underground parking podium and site improvements at an existing shopping center; Tentative Map to subdivide an 8.1 net acre parcel into 2 parcels of 3.0 and 5.1 acres in size, with one parcel to be further subdivided into two commercial condominium units and a common area lot; An Exception to the Heart of the City to reduce one side-yaxd setback to 15 feet for a proposed 4-story, 122 room hotel, a 3-story 5b,194 square foot mixed use retail/office/convention center building; A Tree Removal request to remove and replace approximately 47 trees that are part of an approved landscape plan for an existing shopping center FINDINGS OF DECISIONMAKING BODY The City Council granted a Negative Declaration since the project is consistent with the General Plan and there are no significant environmental impacts. Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on City Clerk z~ - ~ os ~; Republic ITS Intoliigsnt Transportation Services October 18, 2007 E1221 David Stillman City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Subject: Traffic Impact Analysis Letter Report Proposed Redevelopment of The Oaks, Cupertino Dear Mr. Stillman: EXHIBIT A Republic 1TS is pleased to submit this traffic analysis for the proposed redevelopment of part of The Oaks shopping center in Cupertino. This report reviews on-site circulation and parking, off- site parking along the Mary Avenue frontage, and off-site vehicle, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. INTRODUCTION This letter report summarizes an evaluation of the potential traffic impacts due to a proposed change in land use for a portion of The Oaks shopping center in Cupertino. The change is proposed for that portion of the center close to Route SS where the movie theater was previously located. The new use is a mix of hotel, retail, office, and meeting room space. With input from City of Cupertino staff, the scope of this study reviews the following items: / An estimate of the net change in vehicle traffic and distribution of that traffic to the surrounding streets / A comparison of intersection performance at the following nine locations: 1. Stevens Creek/Bubb 2. Stevens Creek/NB 85 ramp 3. Stevens Creek/SB 85 ramp 4. Stevens Creek/Mary 5. Stevens Creek/Stelling 6. Stevens Creek/Saich 7. Stevens Creek/Banciley (510) 440-8127 Fax (510} 440-1751 42000 Osgood Road, No. 112 Fremont, CA 94539~-~5~07743 BOSTON DALLAS • I.OS ANGELES . SACRAMIIVTO SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCI5C:C5 107 .~ _~_. ~~; Repr><bt~c ITS Intalllgont Transportation ser~l~: David Stillman City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page 2 8. Stelling/Greenleaf 9. Stelling/McClellan / Review of pedestrian, bicycle, and transit infrastructure per VTA guidelines / A review of on-site circulation and parking / A review of off-site circulation for the portion of the Mary Avenue site frontage Figure 1 shows a map of the site location, study area, and study intersections. _ ~ S VAIVCS.Y W L ... YII I E'+ t I ~~ ~ .... t q4 2 .- [ 1 r-y /~ i +"i 3 E~~j(lt 111 I: ~... l_; w`; ',~ ._._ [ K:.,_ ~,I ."Va118y,Grgy~~ 1 4~ ~ ': l 3 ~, j, lya. ~. ~~ Study Intersection {typ.} i3 es or ~ 1:..1 i,_ t3~~. m,....::~ ~ ,:~ tk t :: ~~~, } .~? ; - ~ ~, . _' ~ _-. g~ SN t .... --. z. . F .. .. E ~.~.. _w Z ~ I ~I; r~ Scadald lk ~~f ~unnso~?r ~- ~'~ ~ , - ~I:: 1Qf TtBQ Intl ,.. .:. I Rodrigues AvQ ~"~ : e :.1 RhalM r5r _.. . (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 ~~~7 BOSTON DALLAS . LOS ANGELES • SACRAMIIV'I'O SAN DIEGO . SAN FRANc:L5C:6 108 Figure 1 Source: Google Vicinity Map Rept~bl~c David Stillman ITS City of Cupertino Intelligent October 18, 2007 Transportation Pa e 3 services g EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed project consists of demolition of a movie theater and commercial space and construction of a mix of hotel, retail, office, and restaurant/banquet space. The proposed land use is expected to generate 178 vehicle trips in the morning commute and 355 in the evening commute periods. The existing land use would be expected to generate 10 trips in the morning commute and 103 in the evening. These trips are considered an allowable deduction from the new proposed trips resulting in a net increase in traffic generation for the site at 168 trips in the morning and 252 trips in the evening peak periods. Based on input from City staff, nine signalized intersections near the project site were selected for evaluation {see Figure 1). Also, a list of 17 nearby proposed developments plus four pending projects was identified for evaluation as the Approved Trip Inventory (ATI). Table 1 summarizes the intersection performance under the traffic scenarios labeled Existing, Existing + ATI, and Existing +ATI + Project. Level of Service (LOS} is a letter grade that describes intersection performance, ranging from LOS A (good, not congested) to LOS F (jammed conditions, long delays). The Valley Transportation Authority defines LOS A through E as acceptable and LOS F as unacceptable. An impact occurs at a study intersection when the calculated with project LOS degrades from E to F based on the average control delay. For intersections already at LOS F a significant impact occurs when the average critical control delay increases by 4 seconds or more and the critical v/c increases by 0.01 or more. As shown in Table 1, there are no significant impacts expected from the project. The adjacent Route 85 freeway is analyzed for this report according to VTA guidelines, and there were no significant impacts. The site is surrounded by a well developed transit, pedestrian and bicycle network and there are no expected significant impacts. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOStON DALLAS LQS ANGELES SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO . SAN FRANCI~~ ~ 09 Republic ITS Intelligent Transportation Services Table 1 Intersection Level of Service Summary David Stillman City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page 4 Level of Service Control Dela Delay Chan e Study Intersections Exist Exist + ATI Exist + ATI + Pro' Pro'. AM C- 32.8 C- (33.0 C- (33.0 0.0 Stevens Creek Blvd. & Bubb PM C (27.4) C (27.4 C (27.3) -0.1 AM C 27.0} C (28.6 C (29.1) 0.5 Stevens Creek Blvd. & SB 85 Ramps PM C (30.5 C- (34.9) D+ (36.3} 1.4 AM C (31.9) C- (33.9 C- 34.5 0.6 Stevens Creek Blvd. & NB 85 Ramps PM C- 33.I) D+ (37.4) D+ (38.4) 1.0 AM C+ 20.6 C+ 22.2 C (23.7 1.5 Stevens Creek Blvd. & Mary Ave. PM C (28.7) C- (34.4) D+ (37.1 2.7 AM D+ 37.6 D 39.4 D (39.6) 0.2 Stevens Creek Blvd. & Stalling Rd. PM D (42.2) E+ (56.4) ~ E+x(57.3 0.9 AM B (15.2 B 13.7) B 13.7 0.0 Stevens Creek Blvd. & Saich PM B (15.3} B (14.9 B (14.8) -0.1 AM B- (18.2 B 16.7 B (16.6 -0.1 Stevens Creek Blvd. & Bandley PM C- (32.4 C- (33.1) C- 33.0 -0.1 AM B (13.7 B (13.2) B 13.2 0.0 Stalling Rd. & Greenleaf Dr. PM B+ (11.9 B 14. B (14.8} 0.1 AM D+ 36.5 D 44.5 D {44. 0.1 Stalling Rd & McClellan PM D+ 37.7 D (45.6} D 45.7 0.1 Notes: Detailed level of service calculations are included in the a endix. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOSTON DALLAS • LOS ANG>r.FS • SACRAtvvfENT'O SAN DTLGO . SAN F~rCr~cs ~ t ~ _ ;: Republic DTs intenige~ Transportation Services EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY INTERSECTIONS David Stillman City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page 5 The nine study intersections are listed above and shown in Figure 1. They are located along the key vehicle access routes near the prof eet site, and would be expected to see a change in traffic volumes if the proposed land use change is approved and built. Intersection operations during the morning and evening commute were studied for this report at each of the study intersections. Operations are described in terms of Level of Service (LOS), letter grade describing the quality of traffic flow through the intersections in terms of delay encountered by the average motorist. LOS ratings range from A to F, where A indicates no or little delay and F indicates jammed conditions. Table 2 provides a more detailed explanation of intersection LOS. Table 2 Tntnrcnr~t:nn i.pvPl of Carvicp lleccrintinn5 Level of Service Average control Delay Description (seconds/vehicle) A delay < 10.0 Traffic can move relatively freely with very low dela B + 10.0 < delay < 12.0 Traffic can move relatively freely with B 12.0 < delay <_ 18.0 minor.delays _ 18.0 < delay < 20.0 B C + 20.0 < delay <_ 23.0 Traffic can move relatively freely with C 23.0 < delay <_ 32.0 moderate delays _ 32.0 < delay < 35.0 C D + 35.0 < delay <_ 39.0 Delay becomes more noticeable D 39.0 < delay < 51.0 _ 51.0 < delay <_ 55.0 D E + 55.0 < delay < 60.0 Traffic volumes are at or close to capacity, E 60.0 < delay <_ 75.0 resulting in significant delays and average _ 75.0 < delay <_ 80.0 speeds that are no more than about one- E third the un-congested s eed F delay >80.0 Traffic demand exceeds available capacity, with very slow speeds (stop-and- go), long delays (over one minute) and standin ueues at si alined intersections Source: VTA (510) 440-8127 Fax (510} 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOSTON DALT.AS • LOS ANGELES • SACRA1v1F1V1~ SAN DIEGO . SAN FItANCI9~a t ~ 1 y~~~~u`~ Republic ITS Intelligenl Transportation services David Stillman City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page 6 Existing intersection operations are summarized in Table 1. The Valley Transportation Authority defines any intersection at LOS E or better as acceptable operation. Therefore, existing intersection operations are all considered acceptable. PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES The study area for this report extends along Stevens Creek Boulevard {SCB) from Bubb Avenue to Bandley Drive, and along Stelling Road from Greenleaf Drive to McClellan Road. On SCB, there are currently paved sidewalks on both sides of the street throughout the study area. At the signalized intersections, there are east-west signalized crosswalks at all locations. There is at least one north-south signalized crosswalk at every intersection except for the two Route 85 ramps. On Stelling Road south of SCB there are paved sidewalks on both sides of the street and signalized crosswalks at the traffic signals. North of SCB there are pedestrian walkways on both sides of the street. The walkways are paved between SCB and Alves Drive, then alternate between paved and compacted soil between Alves Drive and Greenleaf Drive. There are four signalized crosswalks at the Stelling/Greenleaffraffic signal. BICYCLE ROUTES The study area for this report extends along Stevens Creek Boulevard from Bubb Avenue to Bandley Drive, and along Stelling Road from Greenleaf Drive 'to McClellan Road. Both streets are currently striped with Class 2 bike lanes in both directions throughout the study area. There are also Class 2 bike lanes striped on Mary Avenue north of Stevens Creek Boulevard, and on McClellan Road west of Stelling Road. TRANSIT There are two bus routes that serve the project site, VTA routes 23 and 53 as shown in Figure 2. Route 23 connects the site to Downtown San Jose to the east and San Antonio Shopping Center to the northwest. It runs about every 15 minutes during the day and once an hour in the late evening. Route 53 connects the site to Westgate Shopping Center in Saratoga to the southeast and Sunnyvale Town Center to the north. It runs about once an hour in the morning and every half hour in the evening. The closest westbound bus stop is located on Stevens Creek Boulevard just west of Stelling Road. The closest eastbound bus stop is also on Stevens Creek Boulevard, located just east of Mary Avenue. (510) 440-$127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOSTON DALLAS • I.OS ANGELES • SACRAMENT~p . SAN DIEGO . 112 SAN FRANCI9~Q ~__ _~ ~tepubtic David Stillman 1T5 City of Cupertino ~ntsi~igent October' 18, 2007 Trenspprtation Services Page 7 _ ~ 'r- - .. - - _ ^~ - ~~~ .-~-'`.- ..;_ v ~}: -. . r+ ~ s ..^ ~ ~ "'~; , _. ~ t1? ~N~R r P' ,:--' ...... . .......: _..:~ . r......: Figure 2 Transit Map Source: VTA (510) 440-8129 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 $OSI'ON . DALLAS • LOS ANGELES • SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANC79~Q 113 Republic David Stillman ITS City of Cupertino Intelligent October 18, 2007 Transpgrtatipn seryl~c Page 8 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS This section describes potential impacts on the transportation network if nearby Approved Projects and the proposed project are constructed and add to the traffic volumes in the study area. The scenarios of added traffic are summarized as follows: • Existing Conditions plus the Approved Trip Inventory (ATI), a summary of prof ect trips from approved projects that are not yet occupied including the formerly proposed project that included the movie theater and commercial space. This scenario is summarized as Exist +ATI. • Project trips for the proposed development. This scenario is summarized as Exist +ATI + Project. The following paragraphs discuss the Level of Service (LOS) and queuing analysis for the study intersections. The LOS values are calculated using Traffix as required in the VTA Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. Printouts of each LOS calculation are included in the Appendix. The queuing analysis is also based on the average queue from the Traffix analysis. APPROVED PROJECTS City staff furnished a list of 17 proposed development that have akeady been evaluated and approved by the City but not yet constructed or occupied, plus another 4 proposed development that are faz enough along in the development review process that it is reasonable to include them in this study. A list of these prof ects can be found in the appendix. {510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 37G5 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOSTON DALLAS LOS ANGELES • SACRAMIIVTO • SAN DIEGO SAN FxANCr~o ~ ~ 4 ~' Rep~ibl~c David Stillman ITS ~ City of Cupertino Intelligent October i 8, 2007 Trsnrportation Services Pa e 9 $ Estimated traffic volumes for most of these projects were provided by City staff. Republic ITS staff suggested trip distribution patterns for each development which were reviewed by City staff. Finally, volumes at the study intersections were estimated based on the generation and distribution then added to the Existing volumes. New LOS values were calculated and are shown in Table 1. As before, all intersection operations remain at acceptable levels of LOS E or better. PROJECT TRIP GENERATIONAND TRIP DISTRIBUTION The proposed project consists of removing an existing building with a movie theater and commercial space and constructing a new building with hotel, retail, and meeting room banquet room space. The proposed land uses, sizes, and estimated trip generation are shown in Table 3. Table 3 Estimated Trin ('generation Ex istin Tri Generation Land Use ITE Amount AM Trips PM Trips Daily Code ~ Out Total In Out Total Trips Movie Theater 443 15 KSF 2 2 4 87 6 93 1,171 Commercial 493 3 KSF 3 3 6 5 5 10 130 Existin Totals 5 5 10 92 11 103 1,301 Proposed Trip Generation Hotel 310 121 rms. 32 23 55 29 30 59 971 Retail 820 18.2 KSF 26 17 43 78 85 163 1,785 Office 710 18.3 KSF 42 6 48 17 82 99 361 Meeting rooms2' s 310 14.4 KSF 19 13 32 17 17 34 428 Proposed Tota ls 119 59 178 141 214 355 3,545 Net Chan a 114 54 168 49 203 252 2,244 Notes lAssumes 90% occupancy 2Assumes 300 SF per hotel room for trip rate equivalency 3Calculated from Average trip generation rate 4'Tri eneration rate calculated from total retail land use area of 35,000 GSF The trip generation rates used in Table 3 are from Institute of Transportation Engineers-Trip Generation 7th Edition. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 44Q-1751 37b5 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOSTON DALLAS LOS ANGELES • SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO • SAN FRANCL'~CS ~ ~ 5 - ;..:: ~: Republic David Stillman tTS ~ City of Cupertino Intelligent October 18, 2007 Trensp°rtat+nn services Page 10 LEVEL OFSERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS As with the Approved projects, a draft trip distribution pattern was developed by Republic ITS staff and reviewed by the City for use in this analysis. The approved pattern is summarized as follows: • 40% north on Route 85 • 30% south on Route 85 • 5% west of SCB • 7% north an Stelling Road • 15% east on SCB • 3% south on Stelling Road The volumes were added to the volumes from the Exist +ATI scenario to form the Exist +ATI + Project scenario. Level of Service was calculated with the new volumes and is summarized in Table 1. After Project traffic is added, LOS values remain within the acceptable range of LOS E or better. LOS calculations are included in the Appendix, as are summaries of the peak hour traffic volumes for each scenario. There are no significant impacts on intersection operations that result from the proposed development and no mitigation measures are required. LEFT TURN QUEUING ANALYSIS A queuing analysis was conducted based on the average vehicle queue length reported from the Traffic software output. The projected queue length was determined using an average vehicle length of 20 feet per vehicle. The calculated queue lengths for all left turn movements at study intersections where the proposed project adds left turn traffic are summarized in Table 4. As shown, all queues are less than the available storage except one move at the SCB/Mary intersection, which has a long queue because of other approved projects. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 ,7 $OSCON . DALLAS LOS ANGELES SACRAMEN'T'O . SAN DIEGO . SAN FRANCIS~'~ 116 ~~ ~__ Republic ITS intelligent Transportatipn Services Table 4 Queue Length Summary David Stillman City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page 11 Location Approach Direction Storage Length (ft) (No of Lanes) Peak Hour Existing Queue Length (ft) Exist + ATI Queue Len th ft Exist + ATY + Proj. Queue Len th (ft) SCB - 85 S SB 550 (2) AM 180 340 360 PM 140 220 240 SCB - 85 S WB 1770 (3) AM 80 100 120 PM 180 240 280 SCB -Mary SB 260 {1) AM 40 40 60 PM 120 140 200 SCB -Mary EB 220 {1) AM 100 100 140 PM 180 240* 300 SCB - EB 300 {1) AM 180 200 200 Stelling PM 200 260 280 SCB - NB 320 {i) AM 260 260 260 Stelling PM 260 340 360 Notes: Bold font indicates a queue length that exceeds the storage pocket length. * =Caused by added traffic if existin vacant on-site buildin s were re-occupied. There is a potential impact on the left turn storage length at the'SCB -Mary Avenue intersection for the eastbound left turn movement during the PM peak hour. There is a potential negative impact on intersection storage, and the required mitigation measure is to lengthen the left turn pocket from 200 to 300 feet. Modification of the traffic signal timing to increase the green time for this left turn move is also recommended. FREEWAYANALYSIS Since the project is located adjacent to a ramp of the Route 85 freeway, the VTA guidelines require evaluation of project impacts on the freeway. The first evaluation looked at whether the project traffic represents 1 percent or more of the freeway segment capacity. Two locations were found to have a contribution slightly less than 1 percent, and were flagged for further study. Based on the VTA Traffic Impact Analysis guidelines, the two locations that were found to have added project traffic nearing the 1% capacity are summarized below: • NB Rte 85, PM Peak, SCB to I-280: LOS B: Project contribution 0.7 • SB Rte 8S, PM Peak, SCB to De Anza: LOS F: Project contribution 0.9% (510) 440,8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Xale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOSTON • DALLAS . I.OS ANGELES . SACRAMENTO . SAN DIEGO SAN FRArrCr~cT ~ ~ ~ ~~ ;~,'` RepUb11C David Stillman ITS City of Cupertino Intelligent October 18, 2007 7rpnsportation Pa a 12 services g According to the VTA guidelines an impact is considered significant when the project contributes more than 1 % of capacity and the freeway segment is at LOS F in the existing scenario. The impact on southbound Route 85 between De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard does not constitute a significant impact, hence no mitigation is required or proposed. A summary of the full analysis is included in the Appendix. There are no significant impacts on freeway operations for the two freeway segments analyzed. TRANSIT, BICYCLE, AND PEDESTRIANIMPACTS According to VTA guidelines, impacts on transit, bicycle or pedestrian facilities occur if the project causes congestion that impacts bus flow, impinges on bike lanes by adding significant amounts of right turn traffic, or blocks existing pedestrian facilities. None of these criteria hold true so there are no significant impacts. There are no significant impacts on transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities and no mitigation measures required. SITE CIRCULATION The project site is part of an existing shopping mall, which is bordered on the west by Route 85, on the north and east by Mary Avenue, and on the south by Stevens Creek Boulevard (see Figure 1}. Access to the site is provided via two driveways on SCB near Mary Avenue and two driveways along Mary Avenue. The proposed project includes demolition of the northwesterly building and replacing it with paved surface parking and construction of two new buildings along Route 85 frontage. The eastern entrance off of SCB will be modified to allow full on-site access. The site map showing the proposed new buildings and existing buildings that will remain is shown in Figure 3. The existing site has four driveways to adjacent streets. The proposed site plan proposes to modify the eastern entrance to a full access driveway. The existing site has two areas of concern that would likely be heightened with addition of project traffic: 1. The entry off SCB, which carries the largest volume of traffic of the existing driveways, has an awkward layout and a raised island that make for inefficient movement to and from SCB. This comment applies to the existing condition. The proposed condition shows a modification to provide a larger island adjacent to Stevens Creek Boulevard. The island as currently drawn appears too large to allow truck access to and from Stevens Creek Boulevard. This report recommends checking the truck turn path and modifying the east-west width of the island if needed. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOSTON • DALLAS LOS ANGELES SACRAMENTO • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCJ9~6 ~ ~ 8 Republic lTS Intelligent T~anspvrtat7on str~yl~s David Stillman City of Cupertino October 18, 2007 Page 13 2. The existing parking aisle closest to SCB and the next aisle have directionality that is reverse of typical right hand drive, which forces traffic to cross awkwardly at the each end of the parking bay. Reversing the direction of the angled parking, aisle direction and the two-way access would improve on-site circulation. The current site plan already accommodates this recommendation, and no further action is needed. See Figure 3. (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOSTON DALLAS . I,OS ANGELES . $ACRAMFNI'O SAN DIEGO SAN FxANCIS~~ ~ 19 N J N O PARKWK (iR~Gt11REMEHT: #~TEtd3UESTf~OO~>nLq~~TitUC:. a~smaya•as srxau w.xa+7t1T s aswxa•a.n . _ _.... 'rota :H dAaY~ I o, C . 1~ C Ml N t~ l i r? 3 bi f".... ...i.. ke. ~-.~_T-.--a....a ~ ;-s ~ a-~~ ..: ; IY-l1 c l l x• 1 4 p!Ni9~~Uf: . .........._ ~ a•~ieieiia a-~ert~ ~'Gw'.•wYIM~OO YAIa••YOrY.-Y[.LX 1'~ 1 X1 .wrroi¢Maoaar:an:rma;t m!watarat I f-i' -'.+i~ii~Y OWIR!'MaAY~1YNYYM16Ja4.Oa:TC. ~ m' ,~ JYN40!rt~NLp/LtiSYtifY91i4\a ~ [ n~iaaa~' 9aV~Kt! YM1Ii•u•raN1+Y+ercaexdaee ~ „,•.•-o.~ ~ fGMi/61 YKO~LnYa•n aii~~.~ Y YllOalpl•>ai NYalraY•Ga•9KO•S -'- '- +aaanlrmy, YAlT M~iMdb:CMkXWM ____ - wntanxswuocc.aiacceaatrua m .__'~x--~ _ ___ ~ d :::: ~_--• - - .- _ i ~ ___ _ ~ X ~ ` ~ to W ' ~ .. y.. ', ~ t'.. ~ ~ r - ~ i i.; _ _! _ _ ~ `i n$~~~ ~ i ~ ~ i ar+u•ius~i; - i i .. ~" E.~' nauA' 1~ ~ 43 6, r~--;.a ~ ~ l r ~~ s;~.ur °.,, .~ ~j.~---- 4 ~ j .. {~. f : w_v ~r. w. cn - ,,,,. _.. ,.. ~ - ,. i . . _ ~:,. __ _.-...-.Y_ .-..._.- ----- T __. SttE.1M.lw -- - -~_ ~ _ _ gR „ ~ ~, -... --- -- .._____ ~ .a..•: storm Figure 3 Source: Sand Hill Development Company Site Plan (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOSTON • DALLAS • LOS ANGELES • SACRAMIIVTiO SAN D1EGO SAN FRANCISCO ' fY1Y Y.Yx 9a[C. pool ^.+•p __ Fi1MINARY SE7E PLPJ+t A'' •...~..... .__._..._... -.-. - I '-... N V N (510) 440-8127 Fax (510} 440-1751 BOSTON • DALLAS • LOS ANGELES • 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 SACRAbffi~]TO SAN DIEGO SAN FxANCrscO `.n a;~'' ,~ ~~ InteJli~Qnt Transp~ar#atian Servire~ CONCLUSIONS Demolishing the movie theater and adjacent commercial space replacing it with the proposed mix of retail, office, and restaurant/banquet space would not result in any significant LOS impact to the study intersections. The evaluation of left turn storage capacity identifies a potential impact at the Stevens Creek Boulevard and Mary Avenue intersection for the eastbound left turn movement. The required mitigation measure is to lengthen the left turn pocket from 220 to 300 feet. Additionally, implementing the revisions noted on the site plan would greatly enhance on- site traffic circulation. Please contact me if you have any questions or comments at 510/440-8127. Sincerely, Republic ITS a-'( Steve Fitzsimons, P.E. Transportation Engineer (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 42000 Osgood Road, No. 112 Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BosroN Dar.Lns T os AtJGE~s SAC[tA~'o Sarr Duo Sir FRatvcr.4~ ~ 22 .:.. ~_ ~~` i~t~aii~~~,~ Transp~art~~i~n Services APPENDIX (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 42000 Osgood Road, No. 112 Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOSTON . DALLAS . I.OS ANGELES SACRAMII~TDO . SAN DIEGO • SAN FItANCL~U 123 Freeway Level of Service Calculations Route SS Direction Peak I3our Segment Project Tri s Lanes Segment Ca aci Percent Increase NB AM SCB to 280 22 3 6,700 h 0.3 NB AM De Anna to SCB 23 2 4,800 h 0.5 SB AM 280 to SCB 31 3 6,700 vph 0.5 SB AM SCB to De Anza 16 2 4,800 vph 0.3 NB PM SCB to 280 52 3 6,740 h 0.7 NB PM De Anza to SCB 12 2 4,800 h 0.3 SB PM 280 to SCB 16 3 6,700 h 0.2 SB PM SCB to De Anza 39 2 4,800 h 0.9 (510} 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOSTON . DALLAS LOS ,ANGELES SACRAMEN'PO SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCrs~cf ~ 24 List of Approved and Pending Projects Approved 1. Wolfe & Vallco Parkway (Vallco Residential) 2. N. De Anna Blvd. and I-280 (Oak Park Village) 3.20128 Stevens Creek Blvd. (Adobe Terrace) 4. 1375 S. De Anna Blvd. (Wolf Camera) S. 19770 Stevens Creek Blvd. (Marketplace Bldg. C) 6. De Anna Blvd. & Rodrigues Ave.(Civic Park} 7. Stevens Creels & Wolfe Road (Menlo Equities) 8. Wolfe & Vallco Parkway (Occ of Vacant Space) 9. Wolfe & Vallco Parkway (Vallco Expansion} 10. Stevens Creek Blvd. & Stelling (De Anza College Expansion) 11. Whole Foods 12. Stevens Creek & Portal Dr. (Chuck E. Cheese) 13. Mariam Ave. & N. De Anza (Any Mtn Off} 14.22350-82 Homestead Rd. (Harrington) 1 S. 20555 Valley Green Drive (Public Storage) 16. 510 Alberta. Avenue (Riorden & Reston Terraces} 17. 707 E. Homestead Rd. (Pala & Francolin Terraces) Pending 10100 N. Tantau Avenue 20800 Homestead/10$07 N. Stelling (Villa Serra) 10855 N. Stelling Rd. (Larry Guy) De Anza B1vd.Bollinger Rd (in San Jose) (510) 440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 ~~7 BOSTON DALLAS . IAS ANGELES . SACRAMENTO SAN DIEGO . SAN FRANCLSCd ~ 25 The Oaks NB EB SB WB Project Traffic RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT SCB-Bubb AM 5 2 PM 2 10 5CB-85 South AM 5 40 2 13 PM 2 20 10 61 SCB-85 AM 30 45 * 18 15 North/College Exit PM 15 22 * 81 71 SCB-Mary AM 75 17** 11 13 13 PM 37 76** 51 8 6 SCB-Stelling AM 3 1 7 3 7 15 PM 1 6 30 14 3 7 5CB-5aich AM 7 15 PM 30 7 SCB-Bandley AM 7 15 PM 30 7 Stelling-Greenleaf AM 3 7 PM 14 3 Stelling-McClellan AM 3 1 PM 1 6 Notes: * =Shows traffic for NB College Exit at this intersection, no project traffic assigned. ** =Traffic exiting the site to the west is expected to use the driveway to SCB. The volume shown here is for reference only. {510}440-8127 Fax (510) 440-1751 3765 Yale Way Fremont, CA 94539-5043 BOSTON DALLAS . Los ANG&I,ES SACxAMEn1T'O . 51~r DIEGO . Sat~1 FxnrICL~LO ~ 26 Existing AM Peak Thu OCL 11, 1007 14~1fi:73 Page 1-1 Cupertino TIA Intereectian Gleulatione Scenario Report Sctnarie: Existing AJS Peak CO~awo7d. Existing a ATI + PxO~eCt AM Volume: IDciating AM Peak hour geometry. Existing AM Fact Pee: Default ImpaCL Pee Trip Generacioa+ Nose' ' Trip DiaCxibution: Daily ~ , Paths. Default paths Rwcesr Default Routes CenElgoretione Default Coafiguxation TxeLiix 7.8.0715 {cl 7006 Donliag Assoc. Licensed c0 CT17f OF CUPERTLNO N J N V 8xieting AM Peak Thu Oct 11, 2007 14 a16e25 Page 2-1 Cupertino TIA Inter:action CalculatioOs Trip Distribution Report Percent Of Tr1ps Daily , To Gacaa l 7 3 ~ 5 6 1 40.0 30.0 S.0 7.0 ].0 1s.0 ' TraEElx T.8.0'f15 fW 7006 Dowling .ASSOC. Licensed to CITY OE CUPERTTl~ N V N Dei acing AM Pea1c Thu CCL 11, 2007 14116e25 Paga 3-1 Cupercim TIA Iaterseccian Caloulati0nf Turning Movement Report None Volwa Norehhound Salthbound 7astbotmd rvescboiatd Tosnl Type Lelt 'iLru Right Aelt Thru Right Left 'nc~V Right Laie Tliru Right volwtte $3 8tevena Creek a HUhb Rd Halle 114 11 309 93 27 50 14 646 17 507 831 39 2181 Added 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 total 144 11 505 93 27 50 14 64b 87 507 831 39 1951 111 9cavlae Creak c ?fart' Ave Safe ]7 1 29 70 L1 172 1I4 992 130 69 797 86 2610 Added ' D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. Total 37 3 19 70 11 172 214 952' 230 69 757 66 1610 i7 Stavane Croak a 88 85 Rsttpf Ifafa 0 0 0 B70 0 1D1 0 2043 f:BD 172 661 0 3D27 Added 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 O total 0 0 0 170 0 101 0 1013 180 172 661 D 3027 N4 Scw4vtl Ccsak c to fa Ratt~^ Hasa 40 83 0 11B S 361 681 1245 0 0 961 495 3899 7Wded o 0 0 0 o D o D o D D o D Total 40 87 0 218 S 361 683 124s 0 0 S81 49s 3699 OS 8cwena Creak 6 Htelling ~ HsN 793 34B 146 20] 354 191 248 411 193 443 663 112 1075 neeae D o D D D D o 0 0 0 o D o TOLaI 393 948 146 702 391 191 148 411 193 443 863 141 4039 J6 Stevens Creek i 9AIC8 H4N D 0 0 34 0 107 ~ 259 430 0 0 698 60 1184 Added D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TObI 0 0 0 34 0 103 19f a70 0 0 898 60 2181 !7 seevem Crack a 79randlay . Sae! i4 24 7 36 9 22 190 861 20 28 85B 108 1932 Added 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 O D Total ~ 14 2i 2 36 9 27 190 661 30 ae 898 108 IB37 $8 9ta111ng & OrefAlea! Baaa 14 d96 21 B 515 SO 108 30 32 39 15 11 1910 , Aedad D D 0 D D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total I4 dHi 14 9 919 50 X09 20 32 74 15 32 3910 $9 Stalling i MOClellaa coca 2I3 551 75 113 6! 19 192 '149 11 S6 194 199 2181 Added 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 Total 217 591 7S 113 69 69 191 149 17. 96 194 159 2181 Tra!!iX 7.8.0719 lei 2006 Darling ANOC. Licensed to CITY OF CDPHRTIND &^cilting AH feak Thu ocs 11, 2D07 14.16:26 fags 4-1 (,ltpartino T1A .lntareeccion Calrilations Impact Analysis Report Level Oi S4uvica Intereecsian Hasa Fvatre c3tange Dell V/ Dal/ Y/ SA 1.03 Vah C ]A8 Veh C $ 3 SCevans'Craak a Hu6b Ad C- 32.1 0.596 C- 32.6 D.b96 • D.OOD D/V $ 2 stevans Crank i story Ave C+ 20.i 0.388 G 70.6 0.388 • 0.000 D/V $ 3 9tevans Creak 6 90 BS RampL C 27.0 0.415 C 27.0 0.446 + O.OOD D/V $ 4 Stevens Cte1k 6 NB IS Aaaps C 3i~9 0.625 C 31.9 0.629 + 0.000 D/V $ H stwuts Creak G Stalling Ad D+ 37.6 0.722 D+ 37.6 0.712 + 0-000 D/V $ 6 9twenf Creek 4 BAiCA ' H iS.2 0.379 H 15.1 0.375 + 0-000 D/V $ 7 etwaDa Creek 4 ffiandlay H- 16.2 0.393 3- 1'6.2 0.343 + O.DDD D/V ~ B 8te111ng i Oreatlaat 8 11.7 0.598 a 13.7 0.591 .0.000 D/V $ 9 4tgliog 4 f4eCl:lien D+ 76.9 0.679 D+ J6.9 0.679 + 0.000 D/V TraSllx 7.e.071B le) 2006 Dcwliog Aafoc. Licanaee to CITY OP CUP30.22ND 6xiatin§ AM Paak 'rha Oct 11, 1007 14+S9e26 Page 5-1 Cupertina TIA Interaectiat Celculacione Lebal OI Service Coaputeci0a Report 2000 RCM Operacion5 Method (Future Volume Alternative) aftla{ttiaaa af•f+••••+a}arfwaa afffa+aa}afr+}r+faerf•{a«wfffaf afa-aff}rfffaww{•f Iatsraeetioa 91 ltaveas Creek 6 Huhb Rd •af•frff•ff•waraa•wwwa•rrA Lfaaatfatf aRf aRffaaaff•N •af•f •a•ar•atRa•f•aR•ff•aaa •f CyCia (saclr - 170 Critical Vol./Gap.(x): 0.599 Lose Time (sec)t 12 (Y.Rf4.0' tat) Average Delay (eea/Vah)c 31.9 Optimal Cycler 49 Level Ot Service. C- H•lfaa4lf•wHwaf••w•ff••affaff•fafaf ff•f•1a•af•aftt Ma•aaa{i•a••{+M •f aa•af ••ef Approach+ North Barad South HaOM East eeund Neec Band 3e7vements L- T- R L- T - R L- T - R L- T- R _--_-...-.--I---------------11---........----II---------------I1------..----.--1 Controlr Split 9haaa Split Phace Protected 9rotected RightSr wl iReluda laDlude include MLR, Oreenr 7 10 10 7 30 ]0 7 10 10 7 10 10 Ianef r 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 7 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 ------------I--•------------II---------------il---------------II--------------•i volune ModuLec Base Volr 144 11 505 93 77 50 14 646 97 607 831 35 OD:omtl+ Adjr 1.00 1-00 ].00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. D0 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD Initial Haar 144 21 505 93 27 50 14 646 E7 507 533 35 Added VOlr 0' 0 0 0 0 'D O 0 O D 0 0 PaseerByvoh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 initial Pats 144 11 sos 93 27 SO 14 949 87 507 537 35 Vaar Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD ].00 1.00 1.00 1•DD 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 9307' Adjr o.e2 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 PAF Volta~r 157 17 349 101 79 S4 iS 703 95 551 904 35 Radaet Volr D 0 151 0 0 47 0 0 69 0 6 3 Aedvoad Volt 157 12 397 101 Z9 7 1B 702 Z7 551 904 33 FCE Ady: i.ao S.oD 1.6a 1.0o i.DD l.DO 7.00 l.oD l.DO 1.DD t.DO l.Do M.! Adjc 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flail VOl.r 187 1] 297 101 Zg 7 li 702 27 55] 904 3S _---_.__-.•.I---------------II..._..---------II-•..--.--------II.._..---_-__---I 8acurati~ Flow Madulac Sit/Liner 1900 1900 1980 1900 1900 1900 1900 19,00 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjnatmentr 0.95 0.95 0.63 0.92 1.00 0.91 0-92 1_00 0.92 0.83 0.97 0.93 Lange 0.9] 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.92 0.08 Final Hat.f 1572 115 3150 1750 1900 1750 1730 3100 1750 3150 3561 115 -----_--____~---------------lt----------....-li----.--------_-II---------.--.•-I Capacity Analysis Modular VOl/88tr 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.01 O.I6 0.02 0.17 0.25 0.35 Crit Mewu rata r}a: +fra fart O7eea T151sr 19.8 16.6 94.0 11.6 11.6 11.6 13.5 37.2 77.7 ]B.2 SB.9 55.9 VallaM/Cepr 0.90 0.60 0.28 0.60 0.18 0.04 0.08 0.60 0.05 6.60 O.S7 0.52 Delay/Vshr 56.0 58.0 73.2 66.5 51.9 49.9 48.4 37.3 29.1 39.1 11.9 11.9 User DelAdj+ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.DO 1.00 l~oa 1.00 Adjpel/vahc 36.0 56.0 11.2 86.5 51.9 41.5 45.4 37.2 19.1 29.1 21.! 21.9 IRS b1' MOM1er 8+ B+ C+ B D- D D Da C D C+ RCM2kAVgQ+ 7 7 S 5 1 0 1 11 1 11 12 17 •a•{•ff•f•fHfNwatN{af aiffaf}l if aaafwaat•}1M at1lwaaA Of{far{afaa•-fa N•+t•}a•f Notar Qnnue reportd is C]ra auahar of cars pts Snaa. TraPLLX 7.5.0715 (c) 2006 Dowllag AsaaC. Licensed t0 CITY OF CVFBRT]NO N V N (C1 Existing AM Peek 771u Oct 11, 1007 ]4r18r28 Page 8-1 CCpertino TIA Intarsatiat Caleulationa Leval Oi Service COmputacion Report 2oaa HQf Dparationa Method l9vtvra VOSume Alter~civel •fa wafaafarfwfawaw aftf:+a•aaAaa•tftRr-aaffaar•aa}a a•aarraawrfa •aaf rfa waaawaaewae IntaraettioR #2 Steren5 Creek 4 Mary Ave faaf•ataaR rf la{afar•a•f•a N atr w•fra•af••f•a•ffwaff a•aal+faaa•ffr}••fa•fffaww•aaa Cycle fesa)r 75 Cti cical vol./cap.lx). 0.3as Logs T10k lteC)c 12 IYaR•,4.0 sec) Average Delay (eat/veA1r z0.6 CpcLoral Cyelee 44 Level Ot Service: C+ +N Ifaaa•alatlfffaflaaa/faffllaFaaafwif affr•Nlfffaftea}f }ffA}ffa /R af••aff Affa}r Approachc ]7orth Bound 9auth Botatd Best 310LLnd NaBL Hound 37aveaentr L- T- R L - T - R L- T- A L- T - R ---____-___-I---------------II_--_.----_-----II------.._------II------.-._-.---I Controlr Protected Protected Protected Protected RighLe: 'include Seclude inclada Include Min. Drees, 7 10 70 7 -10 10 7 10 70 7 10 10 Sanest Z O O I O 1 0 1 0 1 7 0 3 0 1 1 D 3 0 1 volrmie Nodular 3laea vole ~ 37 3 19 70 11 172 214 952 330 69 757 66 4lvwth Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Iicicial H6as 37 3 39 70 I1 172 714 952 230 69 757 68 J9ddd VO]: 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 O O 1?aeaarSyVOlc 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial 2Ut+ 37 3 29 70 12 172 23a 942 730 69 757 66 user Adir l.DO l.aD 1.06 l.oo s.co 1.0o i.oo 1.00 1_DD 1.06 1.00 i.oa FaP Adj: 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.31 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 D.l2 0.91 PBF Yaluawr 46 7 32 76 1Z IB7 233 1035 250 75 827 72 Reduet vole 0 0 15 0 0 147 0 0 180 0 0 57 Aduced VC1r 40 3 7 76 11 40 233 1035 70 7b 523 15 PCB Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adjc i.oo 1.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 i. 0o S.oo i-oD l.oo 1.06 1.00 1.00 Final Vo1,r 40 3 7 76 12 40 293 1039 76 7S 673 15 .-.•-......--~-•-------------II.---------_--__II....-----_---_--II-----------_---I Satnraeiaa Flow t4oCUle: Sat/Lanes 1900 1900 1100 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1400 1900 1900 1900 AdjnsemeaC+ 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.92 0.42 1.00 0.92 Laaaar 7.00.0.73 0,67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 Final Sat_:- 3150 600 1200 1750 1400 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 -_-_-.------(---------------II-----....------II---.---.--.-...II-.-___.-.__--•-I Capacity Analysis Modular vol /SSLr 0.01 0.01 0.01 O.Ot 0-01 0.03 O.I3 0.78 0.04 0.04 0.11 0.01 Cr1t MOVeBr awra rwr• sfa •fwr preen Thar 7.3 10.0 10.0 7.2 10.1 10.1 22.0 30.2 30.3 15.6 23.9 23.9 Valwre/CSpr 0.14 0.04 0.04 O.9b O.6S 0.17 0.45 0.45 0.10 0-11 0-45 0.07 Dalay/Vehr 32.1 78.6 76.6 40.7 16.6 30.3 ,24.5 16.9 14.7 25.9 11.1 17.7 Lber DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Vehc 37.1 76,6 28.6 40.7 16.8 '30.3 24.5 16.9- 14.2 35.9 21.2 •17.7 IAB by MWe+ C- C C D C C C H $ C Ca . H ~FI2kAvgQe 1 0 0 1 0 1 5 6 1 2 5 0 !•f•hataaaaaAf••{afAafta{faaaafa•}}If lw•Ifai•aia of a•f•+•af Hit •f ra wfaaala tf arf• DIC~ee Queue reported is the n~m6er o! care per lane. 1'rst ll7t 7.8.0739 (C) 200,6 DOw1iRg Asaea. LiCeased GO CITT OF CLTP1ntT'I100 N V CJ O Existing AM Ptak T7as Oct 11, 2007 31,16+26 Fags 7-1 Cupertino TIA intereactiaa Calculations Level Of eervite Crnnpuucion Report 3000 HQ4 Operation8 Method (FnCID'e Volvos Alcernatlve) •a•f•R••arfa••w•r••r•f•Y•1f Yarf ea•f•ra1.1•a•f1r•1•a•4aawrwf rf Nraafr••ara•rala• InOeraeccion A3 Stevens Creak a s8 eH Rays •aa•r••u rarraraa-Mra•aa+raarefaarrasarra•••raraarffarwf•••a•a•••wf araarrar••Yr Cy01e (e,1C): 120 Crikical vol./Cap.lxls 0.443 Loss Tice (sec)= 9 fY+0.~1~0 pee Average Deity Ifee/veh). 17.0 Optimal Cycles 36 Lwel Of Service: C aarawrrawYwraaa•r••.•••N••aaaa ga•YaY•wa«Yar.a.f ar+arawaaaf f••rfN rrff wrar•.w ApprOtchr 310rth EeOnd Booth ¢O+md Exec sound Neac Bosatd Movev+mlc, L- T - E L- T- R L - T- R L- T- R -.--.._.....I---------------II-----.---------II--.......------II-----_-__-_.._•I CenEZOl. Protected Droceccad Droteeead DrOtacted Rights, Include Ineluda 1nClude Include Min. 0raens • 7 10 30 7 10 30 7 10 10 7 30 10 Lsnee+ D 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 7 0 1 o D ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------ll---------------I volume Modula+ , Bess vols 0 0 D 870 0 101 0 1013 110 173 661 0 aror+eh Adj, l.DD 1.oD l.ao 1. DD 1.90 i.oo l.o0 1.00 1.00 l.o0 1.00 l.oD Irt1c3a1 ¢ser 0 0 0 810 0 101 0 1013 1B0 172 681 0 Addeo vet, D D o 0 0 o a D o D o 0 9asaarDyVn1. 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 O 0 0 initial Fv t, 0 0 0 870 0 101 0 10x3 160 173 e41 0 User Adj, 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 F)ff~Adj, 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.93'0.93 0.17 0.9? 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 FEF volu+ss+ 0 0 0 941 0 110 0 1134 196 IB7 716 0 RtldLCt vols 0 0 0 0 0 e7 0 0 171. 0 0 0 Reduced Vblr 0 0 0 916 0 17 9 1131 73 187 71e 0 DCB Adj, 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.90 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 lSoe1 Y01 .. 0 0 0 811 0 i3 0 1131 73 is7 716 0 --.......---I---------------II--._..--.------II-------__-°----li------------.--1 SaturatiC¢1 PlOa Modules set/Case, 1900 1900 1900 1800 1900 1100 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 AdjuetmelsCs 0.91 1.00 0.9I 0:97 1.00 0.92 0.97 0-99 0_95 0.63 1.OD 0.92 Lanass 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00.0.00 1.00 0.00 3.75 O.ab 2.OD 2.00 0.00 Find Bats 0 D 0 x950 0 17¢0 0 7040 453 3150 3900 0 ----___-____i---------------II-......--___-_-II-----_---------11------._------+I Capacity Analysis Modules W1/Saes 0.00 0-OD 0.00 0.19 O.OD 0.02 O.DO 0-1d 0.11 0.08 0.19 0.00 CY1c *avees r•rr sass NN f.Yeds Time, 0.0 0.0 0.0 81.6 0.0 b1.6 0.0 13.4 43.a 16.0 59.1 0.0 Wlusr/Caps 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0-00 0.06 0.00 0.11 O.la O.a4 0.36 0.00 Daley/veh. 0.0 0-0 0.0 a4.e 0.0 20.1 0.0 29.7 29.7 51.3 19.4 0.0 user De1Adj. 1.00 l:DO l.DO i.ao 1.oD a.oD 1-00 l.DO 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 AdjDal/vths 0.0 0'.0 0.0 2i.e 0.0 20.1 _ 0.0 29.7 29.7 51.3 19.1 0.0 IAS by Moves 'A A A C A C+ A C C b- 8. 8Crf2kAvgQ+ 0 0 0 9 0 1 0 9 9 4 e 0 -}f•N•aN •fY•NY•Yaw•e•+}r•f •ff •ftNfNrN•f •Y••e •f as raw•a•f •r••ar+raral/rYfr+• Note: Q+:aua zaportad is the mmHer a! ears per lane. Tra!!Sa 7•e-0715 (01 2006 DOx11Rg Assoc. Liceaeed to CTI1( OF CVRERTIMO Existing AM Desk Thu OCt il, ?007 14x16.26 Paga a-1 Cupertino TL0. intersection Calculations ' Ltval O! Service Con@u[atian Report . 2000 RCM Operations Method (Furore volume Alternatlva) a••aaa••rYaaaa••.af••r•YfYrw.aufra..fa.r••af rfa•af••f.warafa••rwra YYaar.YYaYY-• Interae0ti0rt R4 Stevens Creak 4 RE BS Raaga YYY•fY•Y•wa wfff rrrwf•wrY••f rrf•rfr•1f•f•f Yf YffwY•••ra•Hff Nfewf rf••Ya•f w•r•Y••• Cycle fseel+ 126 CriL1Ca1 VO1./Cap. (X)s 0.625 Lois Time (sects 11 (Y+RY4.7 aecl Average Delay (sac/vehTr 31.9 Optimal Cycle: 52 Laval Of Service, ~ C rwr•f off fl•as•HrMMMrt•HHaH•fff N•aa •iari •rrr1H a1YY••• •fwr .Natal •fawYlwa Approach: Notch 8otmd south Bound Eaac Bound rest Sosmd HOVe+++er)t+ L '- T - R L- T- R L- T- R L- T - R ..-_.______-I ...............II_________-_-___~I----.--.....---II_____-.........I Cmtrolr Bp1ie Phase Split Fhasa Yroceccad Dermitted Rights: Include Incline Include Ignore H10. Oreens 7 10 SO 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanes. 0 i 1 0 0. D 0 11 0 1 7 0 3 0 0 C 0 3 0 1 ------------I---------------II---------------II--•------------11---------------I volume Module, Haft Vol+ 40 a3 0 22e S 361 681 1215 0 0 961 495 crro++th Add, ].DO s.DO 1.00 1.00 l.oo l.o0 1.00 l.ao l.DD 1.00 l.oo i.DD Initial Saes 40 03 0 326 5 361 681 1215 0 0 561 495 Adasd vol. 0 0 0 o D o a o D o 0 0 Fas.ex9ycrol. o o D o o D o a o D D o 2ait1al Fats l0 a3 0 228 a 361 681 1245 0 0 561 195 User Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Q0 1.00 0-00 DRF Adjr 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.00 D$F Volume: l3 90 0 tae 5 392 740 13B3 0 D 610 0 Reduct vols 0 0 0 0 D 240 0 0 O 0 0 420 Aaduced~VOl+ 43 90 0 248 5 152 740 1357 0 0 610 0 PC'l Adjs 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Aej. l.oD S,oD l.oo l.DO l.DD l.DO l.DD i.DO 1.oD S.oo l.oD o.oo Final VO1.. 93 90 0 219 S X157 740 1351 0 0 610 0 Saturation Flux Modules - Sat/Lanes 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjmtm.lst. 0.95 0.99 0.97 0.95 0.96 0_92 0-63 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Laaea+ 0.67 1.33 0.00 0.75 0.07 1.23 7.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat., 1203 2496 0 1346 2! 2161 3150 S70tl 0 0 5700 1750 capacity Anelyau Module! vol/sat= D.a o.aa o.09 0.19 o.1a D.D7 0.23 D.z! Grit MOVeai rww• sass a•aa (lreeb Tima+ 10.0.30.0 D.0 31.3 34.3 34.3 41.8 63.7 VOl ueh/Cap, 0.13 0.43 0.00 0.64 0.64 0,75 C.el 0.15 Ds1ay/Vehr b6.7 8e,7 0.0 41.5 12.5 53.3 31.4 17.0 17sar Da1Adj+ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh+ 96.7 56.7 0.0 a2.5 42.5 33.3 34.4 17.t L09 by Move. E+ S+ A D D C- C- NC)S3kAVgps 3- 3 0 12 17 4 14 SO flff••aw tf YYY.raer•a••f•f raafffrrlra4asYfYa••f+•Maf wffa Notes Queue reported is the nwiber of care per lane_ D.9D D.oo 0.11 o:Do rr •a O.0 0.0 19.9 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.0 O.D 50-1 0.0 l.oD l.DO 1.00 1-Do O.0 0.0 50.1 0.0 B' A A D 0 0 e '0 rr•rrwr•fralwfl•N rY •w1 TraSLix 7.8.0719 IC) 2006 Dortllag ABBOC. LSCansad Co CLTY OP CUPERTINO Existing AN Peak ?hu Oec 11, 2007 is rifi.26 Page !-1 Existing AM Aeak T}iu Oct L1, 2D07 14r 16:16 Page 10-1 Cupertino TIA TncetaecLion Calculations Cupertino TIA InteraeeLiOn Calculations Level Oi Service -Computation Report Level DL Service CortQucaciOn Rapozt ' 2000 AIX Cperaciona Method (Pbcure vOliaee Alteraatiwl 2000 ACN Operecions Method (Future Volume Alterna cive) ••s•+.+r•a.a.•ora•••••+•a••. •aa••.•a..-rs•.s...•...a.•a•a.a•.a.«••.aa.•.a.a •.a.••..a•...•a«.r..••ar..•..•a...a.a..••.a.a a«aaa.•....a •..... ..r•aaa..•.••aaa IAtera4retion 4rS 9eevene Czeek i Stalling Rd InterssecioL R6 Scevene CraaA 6 SASCA ' ••fa•••••a•f••••••1a••••r•••• •••rH•••••ar••r•r•ee •••rff•••r•f••aaa•••r•ar•a a4.1 •a}•rf•••••••a rf a•of•a•a•aa•••rar•aaa•• 1.•a•H •N•••f ••fa•M •••ra+•!•r•••raraa}! Cycle Esee)r 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X1r 0.72] Cycle test): 110 Critical Vol./Cap.(xh+ 0,375 Loco Time (aec)r 12 (Y+Ra4.0 creel Average Delay (see/Vablr 37.fi LOSS Tim! (se01r 9 (Y+R=a .0 see( Avazage i7elay {sec/vah)r 15.2 Optimal Cycler 61 Leval O! Service, rrar H H Da •rr••HH••s+fr• Optimal Cycle+ 36• Leval Ha+rar+a•Hlaaa Hrr aaa••.••.•ar•raaaa.•wa•.aa OL 8ervleer e••ra+aaa•a•.a..rr B as •aaa.aa•. a•.a• a••••••••r rarrNaHHr•fMN N Approach, North Borurd •••••••••arr••• eeneh DavrxL a•r••••••r • Aaat Hound west ernmd Approach: ROrth 8auad 5'OUeli Bound East Found west Hound MOVerMntr L- T- R G- T- R L- T ,- R L - T - R Movemeac: L- T - R L T - R L- T- R L - T = A Control. PrOtaOted PYDLeCLed Protected PSOClCtad COntZO1r ProtODCed PSO-seLed PrOteCtad Permitted Rights: Include LMluda Iaclada iacluds • P.ighca: InclVda 2aelude Iaclvda Zaclude Mia. Greaar 7 30 10 T 10 30 7 10 10 7 10 10 Min. Greear 7 10 SO 7 10 SO 7 SO 10 7 10 16 Laaear 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ] 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 ] 0 3 0 1 Censer 0 D 0 0 0. 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0' 0 D 0 3 0 1 ' Volume Moduie, voleane Modeler Base VOlr 393 Sod 2a6 202 354 211 2!8 417 193 443 663 142 Haas VOlr 0 0 0 34 0 103 259 130 0 D 199 60 (IrOwth Adj. l.ab 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 i.oD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0roath Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ItriC1a2 sit: 393 848 346 202 359 11i 741 412 193 443 663 142 Initial Bee: 0 0 0 34 0 1D1 289 130 D 0 899 60 Added Volr 0~ 0 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 0 0 O Added Volr 0 0 0 0 0 D D 0 0 0 0 0 Daafer8yVO1. 0 0 D D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pas Nr1yV01: 0 0 0 0 a D D 0 0 0 0 0 2nitial Fut• 393 541 246 202 354 191 246 412 193 443 663 142 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 34 0 103 259 130 D 0 198 60 Veer Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Vur Adjr 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1-OD S.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 P}IF Adjr 0.9] 0.92 0.92 0,B] 0.92 0.12 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0-91 0.92 PAP Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 O,D2 O.f3 0.92 0.92 0.92 PLiP Wiuma+ 427 596 267 1]0 315 201 270 448 270 412 721 114 PAP volrmrr O 0 0 37 0 112 ]87 902 0 0 976 6S Aeduet val. 0 0 196 0 0 169 0 0- 95 0 0 127 ~ ReduCt VOlr 0 . 0' 0 0 0 90 0 0 D 0 0 47 RadVCed Volr 427 596 71 ]2D 315 39 270 448 115 ~ 4a1 721 27 Reduced Vol+ 0 0. 0 37 O 13 313 902 0 D 976 32 PCB Adjr 1.D0 1.00 I,00 1.OD 1.00. 1_00 1_00 1_00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1_00 PCs Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,DD 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 M,F Mjs 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 MLF Adj+ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 Final VOl.r 427 $91 71 ]70 315 39 270 441 115 412 721 27 Plaal Vol.r 0 0 0 37 0 22 212 402 0 0 97i 27 fiatutatlon Plow )bdltllr SdCUidtiOn Flow MD dullr Oat/liner 1900 1l00 19D0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 gat/Lna: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190D 1900 Adjuetnrmtr 0,92 1.00 0.l2 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.07 1.DD 0.97 _ Adjuacmeatr 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0-9] 1.00 0.92 0.92 7.OD 0.92 Laaasr 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.37 0.63 2.00 3.D0 1.00 - Lancer 0.00 0.00 0.00 S.OD D,DO 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 D.00 3.00 1,00 Final StL.r 17$0 7600 1750 174D ]800 1760 1760 44'56 1141 315'0 4700 1750 Piael 6at.r 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 1750 5700 0 0 5700 1750 Capacity Analyaie ModVle: Capacity Aaalyaia Module. VO1/8aLe 0.]l 0.16 0.04 0.17 0.10 0.03 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.13 0.02 VO1/Sit. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 D.16 D.16 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.01 Grit MOVafr taa• •a•• raa• •Hr " Ct1t MOVO9r Hat a•a+ r••a Groan Timer 30.4 73.9 23.9 19.1 1].fi 12.6 19.2 19.7 14.7 20-2 15.1 15.1 Green Timer 0.0 0,0 O.D 10.0 0.0 10.0 44.1 91.0 0,0 0.0 46.9 48.9 Volrmre/Cap: 0.72 0.59 0.15 0.49 0_72 0.16 0-72 9.61 0.61 0.68 0.72 0.09 Volume/Cap. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0,00 0.14 0,40 0.1! 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.03 Delay/vUlr 33.8 31.3 26.0 31.fi 45.2 35.4 44.4 71.1 3a.1 37.1 39.6 71.7 belay/Vah, 0.6 0.0 0.0 49.0 0.0 47.1 25-3 2-0 D-0 0.0 21.3 11.4 vier txtlAdjr 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 user belAdj= i_OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 Adjnel/Veh, l3.S 31.3 28.0 78.6 45.2 35.4 44.4 3/.i 31.1 37.1 39.6 31.7 AdjDei/Vehr 0.,0 O.D 0.0 49.s 0.0 47.e ]5.3 2.0 0.0 0,0 22.3 19,4 LOS by }g0ver C- C C Dr 1Y Dr D Dr Dr D+ D ~ LAS by MOVar A A' A D A b C A A A C. 8- RCld]kAVglar 13 1 2 t• ra• r+•+• ••r ••r••• •r•H MM R 7 7 1 •r•H • •a a asf a• •f 9 6 a •a •a •••rt r•a+•+••w 9 1 1 •••a• N • ••aa L•• • ACM]kAvyQr D 0 0 1 0 1 7 2 D • •r• M •H of a•••aa•f M• ••ar• •• • N•f •f f •• • ••• fr •H H •a• •• a•• • a•aa 0 B 0 HH• •}rH N a a M • xote: Ouaua reported ie the aumbar ai care per lane. ~ AOtar Ouaua rapnrtad is the mrciher OL care per late. Trsiiix 7.9.0715 (c) ]006 iTOwllag Assoc. IScmeed to CITZ OF CUPERTINO Traiiix 7.8.0715 (c) 2otl6 Dowling Aaaoc. Licensed Co CITY OF CUPBRT217O N v LJ 8xisti»g Ax Peak Thu Occ 11, 9D07 14rier26 Paga 11-1 Cupertino TIA Incersectlon Galculaciona L4rva1 Of Service CoeputstioD Report 9000 BCl1 OperaLlODS Method (Future Voiuas Alternetivel f•++iH •ARN ••r••w•w•«••••••«•a+• f ••+•Nf N•+NNNNa•NN1•aHN•N•ia wl N~1 YDCarsettiai A7 Scavens~Creak n Brandley •••++•wwwf«••f•+••fl:f•••fN•rr•ef++wrrr••!f•f ••••N•N•r•+•••a+r+.+•••i+•i•rfr Cycia laac)r 110 Cri cical Vol./Cap. (X)r 0.143 Loss '[lace (sec) r 12 IY+RM .O secl Average Delay leec/vah7 a 18.2 Optimal Cycler 39 Laval Of sarvlcar H- w•wNN rrrr++N r+f++•r+• •1r•+ff •+• ••f•w • ••• wfwN•• f++• •!• r r•r N• ••» r •N rf•r•wrf Approaehr IJOZth BOtmd South eowrd Bat Hound 7Cest Bound Moveneiltr L v T - R L - T- R L- T- R L- T- R ____.______-I_______________II----..--__-____II_.___________--II._____.---____.I CODCrolr Farmteted Permitted -rocecced Droteerad Righter Include Include inelude include Mtn, OrNnr 7 1D 1D 7 10 l0, 7 10 10 7 10 10 Linear 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 --------•---I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------! Voluar Modular Heee Vbl. 14 24 2 36 9 27 150 661 20 28 9S9 SDB firoaeh Adjs 1.00 1-00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Hnnr 14 74 7 38 9 2] 150 661 7D 18 159 109 Added Vol+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DasserByFOlr 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 In1Lla1 Rutr 14 24 7 36 9 12 150 Eel 20 18 858 108 User Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PBP'Ad?r 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.93 0.97 0.92 0.97 0-91 0.93 0.92 PHR VOlDfea, 15 36 7 29 10 24 163 718 21 30 93b 117 P.educ C VOl r 0 0 2 0 0 16 0 0 9 0 0 15 RedUCed VOlr i5 26 0 7D 10 9 163 718 i3 30 933 102 PCB Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 lU,P' Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pianl Vol.. 16 26 0 39 10 9 363 718 13 30 933 101 _----.--.--I---------------II---.---_---._._II--'-----.------II--.-------.----I Ssturetion 17ox Module: gat/LaDer 1900 1900 1D00 1D00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adju6tmenc, 0.95 0.94 0.92 0.98 0.98 0. D3 0-93 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 Leneer ~ 0.17 0.63 1.00 0.80 0.20 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 7,69 0.31 YiDal Sate 683 1137 17x0 1410 340 1750 1750 5700 I7S0 1750 6045 S84 ------------I---------------If------------•--II-----------=---II---------------I Capacity Analysis Modular VO1/Bat, ~ 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.09 0.17 0.01 0.02 0.1E 0.19 Crit HOVe9, NM •ira Nre Gra4n Tither 10.0 10.0 10,0 10.'0 10.0 30.0 19.5 58.5 SS.S 39.3 56.5 sB.4 VOlvtae/Capr 0,35 O,7S 0.00 0.30 0.30 0-06 0.35 0.74 0.01 0.06 0.78 0.35 Dnlny/Vahr 60-] SO-9 45-5 51.3 51.3 46.4 14.8 14.0 17.2 30.7 15.1 15.1 user beLldir 1.00 l.oo l.o0 1.00 1.00 l.oo I.oo l.oo l.oo i.oo l.oD L.oo AdjDel/vehr S0.] 80.2 49.5 91.] 51.3 48.4 34.5 34.0 17.2 70.2 if .1 1H.1 LOB byr Mavea D D D D- ' b- D C- H B G B HCM2kAVg0s 2 3 0 2 7 0 4 4 0 1 1 7 f+rflr+•hNw+iNwNiN•N•N•w•••f•••af•••w••i•N++aN•Nlaaf•+aff rN wrH •fNw• NOter QOaue reported is the mrr~er o! cars per Sane. Tialiix 7.8.0713 (c1 2006 Doa]Sag Asea0. Licaneed to CITY OAF CVPHRTIND Bxiacing AM Peak Thu Oec 13, 2007 14si8e24 Page 12-1 Cuperclrro TIA IncerseCLion Celculatiaara Level C! servtee Cnngute[SOn Report 2000 RCM OperaciODe Method lelrtvre ti'O1Wrae Alternative) N •f•+•N+N•+f +r+Nf fr•+•fr•+••ff iw•w N •iNN••a11 N• •I+a N• f r••+ff••f ••r++•rf+ intersection ft9 ScallinB i Greenleaf ••f••rfwfN•ww•++••r•f•++•!•a•fI•+++••N•++~lfr+wr•w•feNf•N •i++rw•wwf •+!r••+it Cycle Isec1, 100 Critical vol./Cap. (X}, 0.599 Loss Tiar9 (seclr 12 (X+Rs4.0 eecJ Average belay laee/vnhl: 13.7 Optimal Cycle. 48 Level Ol Bervi car B •+f •r++N •+r r Naa ••+f Nr.Nr a+++f•+• f++Yf • N+• f f • • wRwf r+++++a+++r! •wN •• I• r+•+• H Appr0aeh, ROrt21 Bound South Hand se8c Bound West 8o~md MOVerrlenCr L- T- R L- T t L- T- R L- T- R ____________~_______________II--------.-..-..II--.-______-__-_II________-__-_._I Controlr Permitted PertOittad Permitted PermiCte0. Righter include Include Lnduda include MSA. GrelAr 7 10 30 7 30 10 7 10 iD 7 10 10 Lanese 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 b 0 0 ll 0 0 ------------I-----------•--=II---------------II---------------II---------------I voluar Module. Bae Volr 14 658 74 ~9 S1B 50 109 1tl 31 34 15 32 Groaen Adj: l.o0 1-0o i.DD l.DO l.oo l.DO 1.00 l.oo i.DO l.oo i.DO s.oo Initial Bser 14 656 74 9 418 5D 109 20 32 34 SS 32 Added vo1 r o 0 0 o D 0 0 0 a o 0 0 PasserByvolr 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IDitisl Fucr 14 ESS 14 9 515 50 1D9 10 32 3! 15 32 lleer Adjr 1.00 l.DO 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PAF Adjr 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.9] 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.91 PRF Wlt7mar LS 713 76 30 560 S4 118 23 3S 77 16 35 Reduee VOlr 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 0 24 RadueM VOS: 15 713 25 10 860 51 119 22 28 37 le I1 PC6 Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj. 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final VOl.r 15 713 3S SO 560 51 219 21 28 37 16 11 .------.----I---------------II---------------II----------.-.--II--.------...---I Brturscioa FlOx Nodular ' Bat/Liner 1900 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900 1100 1D00 1900 1900 2900 1900 Adjnatarent: 0.92 0.91 0.9] 0.91 0,97 0.92 0,91 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.91 0.91 Ianea: 0,07 0,95 0.03 0.01 0.90 0.09 0.70 0.13 0.17 0.68 D.25 0.17 Tr^•t Bat-r 35 1656 59 29 1578 145 1134 736 289 1010 446 39S ----_-_---_-1---------------II-----.-.----..-II.-_..-_..-__---II-_-_.---_--.---I Capacity ADalysle Module. Vol/bat. 0_43 D-43 0.63 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.10 0-10 0.10 0_04 0-04 0.04 CTit Moves •r•r Green Times 77,0 T9,0 77.0 71.0 71.0 77.0 16.0 36.0 1E.0 16.0 11.0 16.0 Volume/Capr 0.60 0,60 0.E0 0.49 0-49 O.a9 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.13 0.13 0.23 Delay/Vehf 9'.0 9.0 9.0 >.6 7.S T.8 18.1 48.1 4E.1 39.9 38.5 38.5 veer Dtl9djr l.DO '1.00 1,DO 1.D0 l.oa 1.00 l.oo l.oo l.oD l.oo l.DD i.oo AdjDe L/Vehr 9.0 9.0 9.0 7.5 7.5 7.5 48.1 48.1 49.1 31.8 79.5 39.5 IOS by Mover A 'A A A A A D' D D D+ Df D RCfl2kgvBQr 13 13 13 9 9 9 6 6 E 2 7 2 f rf • ff+f1•+•f++• r• r •fri• N+N iN f •rf fr+++rNwf1Y+1•+f f+f+r N+r t r N wf rf++N•44f• R i4cu: pueue zeported is the Dunbar of ears per 1ana. Tracfix 7.B.D71S Icl 7006 Doxling AaeOC. Lieeneed to QTY OF CDPBRTIWO N V W N pzleting AM Peak 77tu Oct 11, 2007 14+16+38 bags 13-1 Cupertino TIA Ineersaccion wlculaci0as Level Of Service compuution R~pore 2000 RCh Operations toe tt>al (POCUra Volume Alternative) • . ar ua+•w•rx•a+aa+r•rtt.»trrara •a»»»r.•a•waaaw»r»ra•»••a»•»aa inters'ae ci.On {9 Bcdling a McClellan ».r••r• a•»r»+••aa•ra•r+rr••w•»•rwrr•e•r»•••r»•ra•»a•w• aarrwwar+rr•»r•»• Cycle fasC)+ 90 CriClcal Vol-/Cap. iXl. 0.679 Coss Time feacl: 11 IY+R•a.0 sae) Average Delay (8ae/vahl+ 36.9 Opcitmtl Cycle, 55 Level Of 9ervice+ A+ sr.a+ar+rrararaaraar••a•aa••»reay•araarar+aararaax•rr.rrrar.r•»:.•ra»•araaarr Apptoeah~ North Bound 9outb aoomd • 8aec Round Mast Roua4 Tpve41enC3 L- T R L- T -. R L- T - R L- T- R Owttral+ Proceaied- Protected Protected Protected ltights+ Include Include LGalude Include Min. Oram+ 7 10 SO 7 10 10 7 10 SO 7 18 10 Lanest 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 O 1 D O 1 0 1 D 1 0 1 --.--.__----I---------------II---------------II__.------..----fl----------~----I Voluee Nodules Rasa Vol. 313 551 75 117 69 E9 a92 349 41 56 284 159 Olrovth Adj+ 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 i.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Ree+ 713 551 75 113 69 69 X92 2a9 41 56 394 159 Added Volt D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 b 0 paseer4yvol+ 0 0 0 O D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7nf tial PUt+ 313 351 7f 113 69 E9 292 249. 41 S6 794 1b9 Veer Adj+ 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PRF Adj+ 0.93 0.92 0.97 0_92 0.93 0.97 0,93 0.92 0.12 0.92 0-92 0.93 PAF VOlulaae 132 699 87 123 79 75 317 371 ab 61 31p 273 Redact Vol. D 0 S7 0 0 36 0 0 13 D 0 142 Radtieod Vol+ 733 598 25 133 75 7! 317 271 30 E1 320 ~ 31 PCS Pdje 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.09 rD~P Aa~+ l.DD l.DD 3.po l.DO l.o0 1.00 i.DO i.oD• l.Da 1.00 l.no 1,00 Binal VO1.~ 333 S99 35 173 75 39 317 271 30 61 ago 31 ------------I---------------11-•----•--------II----..__-------II---------------I saturation riot Module+ Bat/Lane+ 1900 1900 1{00 190D 1900 Ll00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 7WjU8tt9ant+ 0.92 0-97 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.98 0.91 0.95 0-95 0.92 1.00 0.93 Lenea+ 1.00 1.93 0.08' 1.00 1.30 0.70 1.00 0.90 0.10 1.00 1.00 2~.OD 81naI Bat-. 1750 3354 ia6 1750 1433 1263 1750 1E73 177 1790 3800 1750 _-___-____-_I_______________I~_._._____,_____il.-------a___.--II__________----_I Capacity Anelysia t4odulet vol/eat. D.1a o.17 0.17 0.07 D.o3 D.o3 o-le D.17 p.27 0.03 0.17 a:oa Cyit yans+ tar• arrr rrrr ••re Greeat Tiab+ 17.2 32.3 33.3 9.3 34.4 14.4 24.0 31.6 31.6 14.7 72.3 2a.3 vOl~man/Cap+, 0_a9 0.86 0.68 0.64 0.19 0.19 0.68 0.47 O.a7 0.11 0.68 0.07 Delay/Velt, 45.3 ]4.a 34.b 57.5 33.4 33.4 37.2 29.3 29.3 34.3 38.3 26.2 Veer De1Ady+ 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 S.DO 1_00 AdjDal/Vah+ 45.1 3a.e 34.8 57,5 33.4 23.4 37.3 35.3 75.3 34.3 38.3 26.3 3.Ok ]ry Maya. D C- C- Ra C- C- D+ C ~ 'C C- D+ BC}l2kAVg0+ 8 9 9 S a 2 SO 7 7 2 9 1 era~ae.»wt»ar•wxarl •earaNN•Hr•N••H •••r••••».»r+HaH»f•af aK •~ar~ars•e Notee Queue zaperced is the number of care per lane. Traffix 7.B,O71B (c) 2006 Da+ling 'ABeoc. Licensed to CITY OF L4PERSZNO N V W W ~; ~. ~~ a~ .a. .S. :~~ ~a, n i ~ i ~ pp O ~ q ~5~~ r . y i o t ~'~ ..~ n • pa . YYp i -yi~ .y ~}~ ~ N i M bi4iQ 1 ~ i ~ ~ u ~ i ~ i Y ~ i e . s; a. ~. ~; ~. Hx . 6q 1 . N d 1 ~. M . .n~ i u i . E . n .yy M ~ V t 1 N/ 1 C ~ V ~j~ ~ ' 1 o;yo~ M 1 • . Q • ~ a ~ N Y ":~~a° a ~'~'~~ ~ F ~ i O i u ~ My . w i N ~ .i ~~~ ~ ~~ 5~ ~ y ~, a . 2 u • w T ~ D m~ N ~ ~ i ~ o Y i b ~ O , O O 1n [~+ . ~ . o n ~ 0 . ~ ., ; o F. W ~ R 4 H O 9 K M C ~~ Mo F Y 4 ~ ~~~~ ~.~~ Gp {pj1 ~ ~~~ Hyy ~rf y~y.yy .~1 ~ Y ICM^ i b.'*I~ O! ~t~?~~~875l5?! . ~~~ E i u aMi p ~ ~ U ~yy pas Ng„ppgGGG F F 0. ~ S 27 - 134 N V W fT 6xieitsy Ph Peak Thu Oct 11, 20D7 1an70:32 Page 3-1 Cupertino T3A Intersection Caleulatiene , Turning MOVaeoant Report Nuns Volume Northbo~a:d Southbound 9aaebound 7lesebaaid Toul Type Lelt Tbru Right Left Thru Right Lett Thru Ittght Lett Thru Right Volume #1 etevens creek i HubD Rd base 93 19 477 X69 14 14 24 700 139 509 6a0 44 2701 Added o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D Total 93 19 477 64 19 la 14 700 139 509 660 Bl 1802 #2 Cteven! Creek i Hary Ave Hass' 245 11 46 148 39 110 299 1514 750 179 965 SOB 3933 Add4:d 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 a 0 0 0 Total 245 31 46 149 38 110 298 1514 250 179 915 108 3173 #3 9twen9 Creek i 88 89 Ra9ps Hass 0 D 0 967 6 791 0 e7! 17a 323 639 0 7738 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 967 8 7$1 0 679 173 313 639 0 3738 #4 9tssens Czeek i NB B5 Rtn~s Bas• S4 206 0 156 1 306 441 1505 0 0 726 909 4355 Added 0 ~ 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 rOtal S4 205 0 '358 1 306 491 1505 0 ~ 0 716 809 9355 #5 6tevens Creek i ptelling Rd pies 319 344 363 349 547 235 247 736 118 535 1053 247 5203 Ached D o D b D o b b e o o e o 1bta1 319 344 363 348 547 136 247 736 216 535 1057 2l7„ 5203 #6 $tw4me Crank i 9AICR !lase 0 0 0 96 0 187 337 1623 0 0 lil9 e0 3421 Add4d 0 0 0 D 0 0. 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 As O 167 337 1623 0 0 1118 60 3421 187 stevans C=eak i Sran6ley Hasa 70 16 40 2B9 16 111 443 1214 87 105 1123 Sb7 3667 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 1bta1 70 16 40 299 16 111 445 1194 6] 105 1123 107 3fi7 66 stalling i Greenlee! 8aae 16 567 12 21 866 35 55 11 29 14 21 24 169! added o o ' a D o 0 0 0 o D D o 0 Total 16 SB7 12 71 869 35 S9 11 35 94 11 24 169! #9 btelitag i McClellan 6aee 119 234 72 "330 994 183 174 ai4 129' 133 376 154 2841' Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 0 7btal 128 234 71 330 554 ~ 183 179 414 129 133 376 15a 1891 Trattis 7.8.0718 (o! 1006 Doo+ling Assoc. Lieeneed W CMY 09 CUPRRTI270 Scisicng PM Pack Thu oct 11, 2007 14,30x32 Daga 4-1 - Cupertino TIA intersettioa Calculations . Is~act AnalYSie Rtport Level O! Service Intersection Hass Future Change ' Del/ V/ Del/ v/ in L9.9 Veh C IA8 Veh C # 1 SCevens Creek i Hubb Hd c 27.4 0.600 C 27.4 0.600 + a.o00 D/Y # 2 StswMis Creek L Hary Ave C 14.7 0.584 C 18-7 0.564 + 0.000 D/V R 3 9tavene Credo i SH 65 Ranps C 30_5 0.754 C 70.5 0.755 + 0.000 DN # 4 Stevens Creak i NB BS RanQa C- 33.1 0.64T C- 37.1 0,647 + 0,000 DN # 5 Stevens Creek 6 Stalling Rd D 42.2 0.631 D• 42.2 0.831 • 0.000 D/V # 6 Stevens Creek i 9ALCH H 15.3 0.483 H 15.3 0.483 + 0,000 D/V # 7 Scaven9 Creek i Hrandley C- 32.4 0.782 C- 72.a 0.782 • 0.000 D/V # B 9ts11ing i QLeaSilaei H+ 11.9 0.732 H+ 11.9 0.732 + 0.000 D/V # 9 btelliag i flcClellan D+ 37.7 0.795 D+ X7.7 0.795 + 0.000 D/V r , Tref!!n 7.8.0715 (c1 2006 Darling Assoc. Licensed Lo CITY OP LVPERTSNO Ariaicnq PM Peak Thu Oec 11, 2007 24:30:J2 Page 5-1 Bxis3cng FM Peak Tbu OCC 31, 2007 14.]0:]2 Paga 6-2 Cupertino TIA Intar saccion CalCUlaciona Cupertino TIA Incereection Calculations Level O! earviea Coaputation Report I,avel O! 6ervice conmuta tian Report 2000 BCM Opera[io[u Ill Chod IPUtuze Volume Alternative) 2000 xCM Operati0na Metb06 (Future Volume Alternative) raarrrrr}rH•a••flaa awaaaawaalaawa•rwrr arra•aalarrraawwaraaaal•}arwa•aafaa•a\w4« •ra~a.•araratlarrr rarra•••aa+ aaalarlaa•awaawra rraarrwaalaalr}«•aw«a rwwrwa••+f Mr Intarseetion p! Scavana Creak a Bubb Rd ~ .•. •aa•dart.a•ra«•warr••rr•a•.••+e«r•w.«rwr•r arawawwaw• .rarw •a•••.u aaa• intareaction pa 9tavene Czaak •••r••••raw.a••r.••r.•aa•aaa i Mary Avt r•.ars.arra••eraa rrr•rr.•..r •rwa••• ara+ ar•a • arrwrra Cycle laac)r 110 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.600 Cycle (aac)r 90 Critical Voi./Cap.l%)+ 0.594 LOea Time (see): 11 IY+R.l .O sac) Avaxaga Dsiry (sae/vah) r 27.4 Lose Time (eac)r 12 (Y+R•4.0 sac) AveragR Relay taaC/veh)r 26.7 Opt itaal Cyeler 49 Level O! Sarvirxr C Optimal Cycles 4d Level O! 9etvicer C rarwrrrawaara•a•aaar•••aaaa• rrwrrraa•w •a•rrraarrra+warraaww•r• •r.rrrrrrr••wra•a awr ra•ara\raarrwra •a uararaar aarra• +a••raraarr aaraa•••a u•rrrr\r raaa area• war•raa Approaoh= NOrch Bound 80Uth RarOd Baec 8outfd Meet Ba7nd Approaehr North Bound South Hound Rut lknaal Neat Bound Movanreltr L- T R __ - - ---- 1 I - L- T 1--- - R - I L- 1- R ------- I L- T - R I Mrwaeamtr L- i - R L- T - R L - T- R G - T - R .. ---- --- ----- - _. COn02olr Split Phase ----------- I Split Phase -- ------ PlOteCtad I--------------- Protected ------------I ---------------I Control: Protected I--------------- I PzoteCtad I---------------I I Protected -------- •------ I Protected PSghear ovl 2nclude ineluda Include Righter Zacluda include Include Ineluda Min. Qramr 7 10 SO 7 l0 10 7 10 SO 7 10 10 M1a. C•`reear 7 1D SO 7 10 10 7 30 10 7 SO 10 Lacsesr 0 1 0 0 7 -------..-.-I-- ---------- 1 0 1 -------- 0 1 -II . 1 0 2 0 1 ---'---------- I 1 0 1 - - 1 0 Lams= 2 0 0 1 0, -----.- - 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 9 1 1 0 3 0 1 --- I Vblune Modular - I --- _ - I---- -- -- -----I .-.--I----- volume MOdulea --I ------- f----- ----------I I----._--__-_---II --_- ----. -_.---I 'Rasa VOlr 93 19 477 da 19 14 24 700 139 509 660 /4 Base Vol: 246 it 46 149 3B 120 296 3514 150 179 965 101 Qrowth Adj: i.oo l.DO 1.0o I.DO 3.00 3.oD 1,0o i.oo l.o0 1.00 l.oo S.oo Orowth Mjr i.oo 1.ao l,o0 1.Da 1.DO 1.00 1.00 l.oD 1.00 l.co l.oD l.oo Initial Bear 93 19 477 64 i9 14 24 700 139 509 660 /4 Initial Hee: 265 11 46 149 7a 130 296 1526 250 179 965 106 '~ Added volt D o D 0 o D o 0 o D o o Added vei, 0 0 o D o D D o 0 0 0 0 PaaaarRyvolr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 paatarHyVblr 0 0' O 0 b 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 IIIS Cial PLLtr 93 19 477 64 19 I9 24 700 139 509 ds0 14 Initial Fut. 245 11 46 349 3/ 120 196 1524 250 174 965 109 Veer Adjr 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Veer Aajs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1•DO L. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 PtlF Adjr 0.91 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 D.l7 0.ffi 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 PF(F Adjr 0.9] 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0-92 FBP Volume, 101 21 S1B 70 21 3S 36 761 la1 053 717 91 P9P' voluarer 2d6 l2 SO 161 4i 130 324 1657 272 195 1049 117 Redtlcc Valr 0 0 223 0 D 13 0 0 106 D 0 9 Redact ~blr 0 0 41 0 0 105 0 0 lel 0 0 90 Raduead Vol= 101 21 293 70 21 2 26 761 45 H63 717 12 Raducad Volt 261 Z2 A 162 l1 25 32d 1657 91 19b 10x9 27 PCB Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FO( Adjr 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 l4.P Adjr 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 TB.F Adj= 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final YOl.r 103 21 293 ------.___-. ------- I 70 71 I 3 ti 761 45 t 563 717 11 Final YOl.v ,266 12 9 162 41 78 321 1657 ~ 93 395 1069 27 -- 9acuraclan F ow NOdtllar --------- ------I -..------------I I--•- ------ -----f ------------1---------------I Saturatio0 Plow )bdUlar I----- ---____...I I------------•--II ---- ----- ------I Bat/Laser 1p00 1900 1100 1900 1900 3900 1100 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Bat/raaar 1900 Il00 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj+••'^r^~r 0.9b O.Da 0.13 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1,00 D.l2 0.13 0.9e 0.95 AdjuatsraC: 0.63 0.95 0.98 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.97 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lmaar 0.63 0.17 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2,00 1.00 2.00 1.79 0.21 Lander 2.00 0.97 0.43 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat_r 1495 106 3150 1750 1400 1750 1750 3900 1750 7150 ]319 391 81061 Sate 3150 2027 773 1750 1900 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 Ca aeit Aoa ie Modular i l i M d l p Y ri 9o1/SaCr 0.07 0.07 0.09 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.20 0_03 0.16 0.72 0.32 Capac ty Ana ya a VO1/Satr 0-0/ o u ar 0.01 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.01 0.39 0-39 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.02 CriC Movsa= ara• roar •awr aaaa Crit Moveas ear. •rrr aarw rra• (cram Tiar: 13.4 13.4 16.3 10.0 30.0 10.0 17.0 39.7 39.7 34.9 57.6 47.1 ~ Orem Timer 9.8 30.0 10.0 12.7 12.9 12.9 27.7 40.0 40.0 15.3 37.6 27.6 Volume/Capr 0.66 0.66 0.22 0.44 0.13 0.01 0.10 0.H5 0.07 0.55 0.41 0.41 VoleaOa/Capr 0.77 0.10 0.30 0.65 0.18 0.10 0.60 O.Ia 0.12 0.65 0.60 O.OS Delay/1(ehr 55-2 55.3 19.3 Sb.a 47.4 45.7 40-7 29.7 23.3 33.4 16.6 16.6 Del ay/Yehr 51.6 37.0 37.0 49.3 31.9 34.3 31-3 20_9 15.0 45.6 31.1 12.2 Uaar DalAdfr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Veer DelAdj: 3.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjpelNah: 55.2 55.2 19.6 55./ 47.1 45.7 40.7 28.7 23.3 33.4 36.6 36.6 MjDal/Vahr 94.6 37,0 37.0 41.3 3}.9 54.3 31.3 70.9 15.0 48.6 21.1 22.2 rna by MOWr Bk B+ 'a- B+ D D D C C C- B I09 by Move. p- Dr D+ D C= C• C C+ H D' C RQf7kAvgQ: 8 5 4 3 1 0 1 10 1 10 e 1 RC42RAvg()r 6 1 1 6 1 1 9 13 2 7 9 1 raera•aw•r••aara•..ar•baaa.ra aar•alrrrrr.a rwrr aaaa.rrrw•aa•a}}+ afearar••aas+rasa wrAN•HNrH}r+ar rrr•waarr+r rraNa •a raa+aa\arrr}awrsaN aa•-arRw raaa4wrlrr•rarrr 1JOCer QUeIIt reported is the number of care per lme. ll0tar Queue zeportad is the nuebar Of dare par lode. - Tra!!i% 7.1.0716 (e) 2006 Darling Assoe. LSeaosad co C1TY of CUPBRTINO Tratiix 7.1.0715 (c) 7001 Dowling A9aOC. Lieansed eo CI7Y OF CVPHRTINO ~' N V W m N V W v Sxifitng PR Peak Thu OCL 11, 1007 14a30,31 Pege 7-1 Cupertino TIA Tnteraaction Calculations Leval O! Service Ca7mputat ion Report 2000 1IC74 Operations Method jfuture Volunr Alternative) Laraaaa•aa•arHratratiatrar+•}.•r•aaaiair+aut•La Lrr•t+a+}•Laaa•r•f•aarrwtar•wat Ineersectiam 93 SceVeas Creak i BO 65 Ra9ps La aa+•aa+•a4r•1a•f}a+w••aa+•H•araara+a+•rf+}r+araa•a of }•IN rrraff•a}af+aa}Lana Cycle (sec)= 110 Critical vol./Cap. iX)s 0.7bb L08a Time (feC)r 9 (Y.R•{.D ere) Averags Relay (sec/Veh)a 30.5 Optimal Cycles 61 Level O! Service[ C aa•rltrrir•rLr•rrlr+a+ailarala•a+•kaaarwa•a•trtw+faia N+•raaLalaraf rafaa•awfrar Approacha North !o[aid 8eruth Beamd kaet bound Nest sound l7ovamante L- T- R L - T- A L- T - R L- T- R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--_.,...--------I Conttola PtOLlCLed Pmtacted Permitted PratetteY) Righter include Seclude ITlclude iaCl~e Min. Ore4a][ 7 10 _ 10 7 '10 30 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lanese 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 O 1 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 ] 0 0 ------------I---------------II•--------------II_..------------11---------------I Volume Modules Ba96 VOla 0 0 0 967 6 751 0 aT9 173 323 639 D crOwth Adj. 1.00 l.oo l.DO l.oo l.oo i.DO l.o0 1.00 1.DD l.o0 1.00 1_oD Initial Seca 0 O 0 967 6 791 0 879 173 323 639 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PaaaerByYOla 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 I711 tiel Fats 0 9 0 967 B 7b1 0 B79 173 333 639 0 user Adja 1_oD i.oo 1.00 l.DO 1.oD 1.DD 1.DO l.oo l.oo l.oa 1.DO 1.00 PHF Aaija 0.97 0.12 0.92 0.92 0.92 0-91 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.91 PAF YOlweea 0 0 0 1051 7 816 0 954 18B 351 685 0 Redact vbl: 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 1SB 0 0 0 ReduOed VOla 0 0 0 1051 7 761 0 955 32 351 695 0 PC3 Adjs 1,00 1.b0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 hLP Adj[ i.DO l.oo l.oo l,oD 1.ao l.oD 1.00 1.00 l.DO. 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol., 0 0 0 1051 7 769 0 958 31 351 698 0 --------_---I---------------II--_--.-__-._-.-II---.---..--....li-----._____-._-I Sacuratiaa Flour Module[ Sat/Lanes 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1400 Adjuacmarna 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.87 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.93 1.00 0.92 Laheaa 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.96 0.02 1.00 0.00 J.88 0.14 1.00 2.00 9.00 Final Sac.a 0 0 0 a!1! 71 1740 0 7266 147 3150 3600 0 _-------_-.-I---------------II._.....-.-------11---_._--._-----ll-----.--_------I Capacity Analysis Modules Vol/Bata 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.11 0.46 O.DO 0.17 0.13 0.11 0.16 0.00 Cr1t MO'ueaa sass ••+. rtaa Green Tiaras p.0 0.0 o.D 8s.6 65.6 65.6 0.0 19.1 19.1 16.2 35.4 0.0 Volwee/Cape 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.76 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.87 0.00 Da1ay/Vaha O.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 11.7 11.4 0.0 a7.3 47.3 54.9 31.9 0.0 UBOr DelAdjx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 AdjDSl/Veha 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.7 11.7 11.4 0.0 47.3 47.3 59.9 31.9 0.0 LA9 by Mover A A A Sa Oa C+ A D' A S+ C- 1SCM2kAVg0s 0 0 0 7 7 21 0 30 10 9 10 0 N+N r N • r+rr+}}a rrr• • tM 1r1a a •rf LN •••a•++a N+ar•araa is ear tale a•aa+N aaaaa+ar M NCtea COew zeportad Se the aua~er o! care per lane. TralSix 7.e.0715 (O) 2006 Dowling Alaoc. Licensed to CITY OF CGPHRT72A 5xisitng PM Peek Thu Oct 11, 2(107 14:30:32 Page B-1 ' CuperCiaO iIA SrILer69CC1pn CalCUlatione Level o! service Compataciaa Report 2000 AC7 Operations Hethod (Future volume Alternative) rawraar•r•p rwrrea.rrrf.rrar++•aa•}•aa•wa+t:rartra uar••+w+rr+a•aaaai•L+»ar•- InteYalCtiOn 64 Stsvene Creak i N8 85 Ramps rr•aaawrrr N aaaarai •f •r+a•a•aai+a+ar~at+a•ararrara Mra•r+•e}wLarratw}}f++wrrtara Cycle (set)a 110 Critical vol./Cag. (X)+ 0.847 LOas Time (8eC)s 12 IX+R~a.O eeel Average Delay Seat/Veh)s 33.1 Optimal Cycle: 54 Tavel Ot aervice+ C- •Hara•~ra to raa•L•L•+•a+ir taliiaaa•rarr•tf+r•Ltariaat •f aaraw4ta+aata •a N a•f a•tar Approechs North Arnmd South sound bast 6ouad Nest BO+nld MOVemlac s L - T - R L- T- R L - 7- A L- 2- A ------------1---------------II---------------II---------------II------•-•------I Contmla Bplic Phase Split Phase, Protected Peztaltted Rights= Lnclude Include Include ignOZe Miit. Cream 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 30 10 7 10 10 Laaasz 0 1 1 0 0 0 D 11 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 ._-_._------1---------------II._-...._--__--'11-----.---------II--...------_---I Volume Modules )Jess Yola S4 205 0 258 1 306 491 3505 0 0 726 809 GrO++th Ad3a 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 Iaicinl Hiea 54 nos 0 258 1 a06 491 SSOS 0 D 726 809 Added VOla D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PaseeYByVol+ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Futa 54 205 0 258 1 706 a91 i5 D5 0 0 726 809 Vass Adj. i.oo l.o0 1.00 l.oo i.oo i.oo l.oo S.oo S.oo i.oo 1.0o D.oa PRF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0,92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.00 PNF V0llsmaa 59 723 0 280 1 333 534 1636 0 0 709• 0 Redact vole 0 0 7 0 0 205 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aednced VO1s 59 273 0 280 1 128 534 163E o 0 788 0 ECE Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Aaja l.o0 1.DO i.oo i.oo 1.00 1.09 l.o0 1.oD l.oo i,oo i.DD a.ao FSaal VoI.a 59 227 0 280 1 12d 534 1621 0 D 789 0 ------------I---------------II--.--.----_--.-II--._-----------ll-----------._--I 8aeuratioa Flow wodulea gat/Lance 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuetmeslts 0.95 0.98 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.12 0.8a 1,00 0.91 O.l2 1.00 0.92 IdIIeBa 0.43 1.57 0.00 0.80 0.01 1.19 2.00 3.00 O.DO O.DO 3.00 1.00 Final sat_+ 771 2928 0 1451 6 2081 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750 ._-.-'----'-I---------------II---.---_--.____II~---.-.....-..-II-_------.------I Capacity Analysis Modules Vol/Sat+ 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.06 0_17 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 flit Novena *••• • rwtr •++L Creep Tine, 12.9 12.9 0.0 32.8 32.8 11.8 21.8 57.3 0.0 0.0 23.6 0.0 Volume/Cep: 0.65 0.65 0.00 0.66 0.66 0.71 0.65 0-fi0 0.00 0_00 0.65 0.00 Dt1ay/Veha 53.6 53.fi 0.0 38.7 38.7 79.1 40.0 21,2 0.0 0.0 {1.1 0.0 Vser DelAd]e 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 I.00 1.00 Adjbal/Vaha 53.6 53.8 0.0 38.7 39.7 28.1 40.0 27.2 0.0 O.D 47.1 0.0, IDS ty Mdaroa b- D- A F+ ISL C A Cr A A' D }DO47kAVgp: 6 6 0 11 i1 3 1b 14 0 0 9 0 •ataaeaa HLf r•f Lr+++rta+aita+•rrra!ran'/rLraLteattrteaa-taaaaarrrr+rakrYaarL#IlatLt NOCe+ Queua reported ie the number o! care per lane. Tra!!ix 7.9.0715 (e) 2006 Doal iOg Assoc. LlCenaed CC CITY OF CUPBRTINo 6xisitng PN Peak Thu Oct 11, 7007 31,30.31 Paga 9-1 Cupertino TiA Intersection CalcuIaciane Leval OL 8exvlee Computation Aapart 2000 ACM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ar•• •a••• . .aaf••at•••r.•a••4••e.a•r•••arw. Leaar4ra r.•r•r rraawr •t••. «4•a Intersection tS BCwMS Creek E Stalling Ad •a••rar.4aart••••reek.rta••aa4•ra•44t+awlr•t•a•+•aara •••4ar••at4a Haraa+4a•tawaa Cycle laec)r sD Critical Vol./Cap. U:)r 0.831 Lose Tia+s Iseelr 12 IT.Rf4.0 sae) Average Delay l9eC/vebl, 47.7 Optimal CyCll, 61 Laval OL Sarvlca: D a+f••!r•af•a1•trt•4a444 wf•••rr4araa•4r•KrN•a as alN 4aar ••4•Ifa•1••a•ir appr~oaehr. North cooed South eoa~d 6a8t bound wart Hound M0~4m+blt r -- L,- T - A L- T - R L- T- A L- T - R - _I---------------II---------------II--_____--------1I----.._.-------I Ceperelr 9mtectad Preteeted Protected Protected Righta+ iaoluda Include Include Include Mia_ tirean, 7 10 10 7 SO 10 7 10 10 7 30 10 Lama r 1 0 7 D 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 7 1 0 7 0 3 0 1 -..----_----I---------------11---------------II---.------.----11--__-_-------_-I volume Module, Baca Valr 979 344 363 349 597 235 747 738 718 535 1053 24T Grath adjr 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 Initial Bser 329 314 383 34! 547 335 147 736 218 536 1053 747 Aeaae volr o o D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4userByVO1= 0 0 O 0 O D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fl1tr 329 34{ 369 349 547 735 247 7]6 21B 534 1093 267 veer Adj, l.oD 1.00 l.oD 1.DO S.oo i.oo l,oa l.oo s.oD 1.00 I.oo l.oo 7!fR' Mjr 0.92 0.97 0-91 0-9a 0.97 0.92 0_97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.91 0.97 PEI7 Wlamar 358 374 399 777 S!5 259 26B 800 237 587 3144 768 Reduet Volr 0 0 317 0 0 707 0 0 Sl 0 0 705 A41dn0ad Wlr 351 374 93 379 $95 41 268 800 179 581 1145 63 PC31 Adjr I.OD 1.00 L•.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~vr Adjr l.oD l.ao i.DO 1.00 1•.vD 1.00 l.DO l.DD l.oo l.o0 1.00 1-oD Final vol_. 359 374 63 379 595 46 ac9 800 175 587 1145 63 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------If---------------I Saturation Florr Modular Sac/Lava: 1900 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900 1900 1900 190p 1900 1900 1900 AdjneteMt, 0.97 1.00 0_92 0_97 1.00 0.92 0.97 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00' 0.97 Leaaar 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1.00 7.43 0.97 7.00 3.00 1.00 Final Set-+ 1750 3800 1750 1730 3900 1780 1750 4580 1019 3150 5700 1750 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Aaslyeis Modular Vol/Batr 0.70 0.10 0.03 0.12 0.16 0.03 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.38 0.10 0.99 Cr1t Novael r'~• ar4r .... •raa Greaa Time= 77.1 13.2 13.7 25.8 16.9 16.9 16.9 18.9 18.9 70.0 22.1 77.1 Vbluae/Cepr O.eY 0.67 0.37 0.76 0.83 0.18 0.82 0.83 O.B3 0.63 0.87 0.19 Dalry/vah, 49.0 42.5 77.6 31.7 46.0 31.4 55.1 40.9 40.9 44.! ]7.6 77.3 VBSr DalAdj+ 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Vehr 49.0 42.3 37.6 39.3 46.0 31.4 55.1 40.9 40.9 44.4 37.6 77.3 LOB by Nwe: D b D+ D D C B• 'D D D D. ACM7kAVgQr 13 6 1 12 11 1 10 11 31 17 17 2 f••4aalr•aaaa4+•aa•aaa+••••H L1earM rkr•••a•H•4!•kwra•wM kf •aa4a•aa1•aalia N.r• Note, Queue repozead is the nuatoer of care prt lane. TratLitc 7.1.0735 (c) 1009 Dwliag AsaOC. Licensed LO CITY O! CRIPBAT]39D N v W DD Bxisitng PM Peek Tltu OCC 11, 3007 14+30:37 Fage 10-1 Cupertltw TIA Lncsreection Caiculationa Level Ot Service Computation Report 2000 ACM Operations Method (Furors Volurte AltcrnatLve) a•••a•4•raa wa.4•a+a•+4a4•uN•a••u•aaaaa•a•aaa•saaraata~at•'aaa!•r4!•r•4•ra•.•a• Intersection R6 5twa,w Creek t. SAICA aa4•rr4.•ar.•4a•aaa•.r••a•aaatraaar4•ra4a•••r••a+•araaa•a•+aar•a•+•a4 a•u••tra•w cycle (seclr Lib Cricical~voi./Cap.(X1. 0..83 Loss Ti,ee leech 9 (YaR+0.0 see) Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.3 Optimal Cyola, 36 Lwal OL SeiVice, H ••aa•a•aaaa •atraaaa•a+aa4••a•aar•a••rraau ar•+a•atraa4aw w•ara••a•••ar•••4••aarr Approachr Aorth Hound Bouch Hound Bast Bauad Vert lamd MOVMlSIt r U- T- R L- T- R L- T- R L- T A ____._____-_~---------------II_______________I~_____-._.--_-.-I~_______________I Control, Protected Protected Protected 4e17eieted Righter include 3ttclude include Include Min. Greenr 7 10 10 ~ 7 10 10 7 30 10 7 30 10 Censer 0 0 0 0 0, 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 -_-____-_._-~---------------II---------------II--------_.---.-II-----_-___.__--I Volues Module, Haae Vol, 0 0 0 95 0 167 337 1623 0 0 1119 60 Gtoath Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Baas 0 0 0 98 0 167 337 1623 b 0 1119 60 added vOlr o o D D 0 0 0 0 o D D D PaaaerSyVOl, 0 o b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial PUte 0 0 0 96 0 297 337 1613 0 9 1119 a0 Veer Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1_DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PAF Adjr 0,92 0.97 0.91 6,92 0,97 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.91 0.92 0.91 3'AF Yolume, 0 0 0 104 0 203 366 1764 D 0 1215 68 Aaduct vol. 0 0 0 0 0 166 D D 0 0 0 47 Reduced Volr 0 0 D 104 0 ,37 1cc 1784 0 0 1115 73 PC6 Adjr 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 aaa adj, 1.OV 1.aD l.o0 3.00 l.oo l.oo l.o0 1.00 l.DO l.oo i.DD i.0o Eiaal Vel.r 0 0 0 104 0 77 766 1764 0 D 1115 23 ---_________I_______________II___.__-----____II_______________II.___.____-----_I Saturation Plw Module= $at/Lane, 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 3900 1900 1900 1900 1900 3900 Adjuaca+ent+ 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.OD O.97 0.92 1.00 0,92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lancer 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 I.00 7.00 0.00 0.06 3.00 1.00 Final Sat., 0 0 0 1750 0 1740 1750 5700 0 0 5700 1750 ------__-_--I---------------II---------------II----___-_.-----II----_----------I Capacity Analysis Nodular Vol/Sacr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.21 0.71 0.00 0.00 0_3i O_OS CriE MOVaer aaaa rasa aa-. Green Tirear 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 95.1 91.0 0.0 0.0 4S.! 45.9 Velma/mp, O.DO 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.23 G.51 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.03 Delay/Vah, 0.0 0_0 0.0 67.5 0_D 49.9 26.9 2.6 0.0 0.0 11.5 19_0 Goer DalAdjr 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ].00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AajDal/Vah, 0.0 D.D 0.0 67.5 0.0 49.9 16.9 1.6 0.0 0.0 24.9 19.0 LOS ~ Mwa, A A A R A D C A A A C R- AC312kAvgQr 0 0 0 S D 1 SO 5 0 0 10 0 a•4/oaf arrr44ra4aa M a4tar44•••4t•4a+1a}•4ar4r a+aa•rN4a•laaaa H•r•w1aa4.1. H•aa• Voter Quane rapprtad is Ehe awibar of cars per lane. Trattia 7.8.07]3 (c) 2006 Dorl ing Assoc- Lioenaed to CITY OF CUPERTINO sxisi cng PM Paak Thu Oct 13, x007 14=30=33 Page 31-3 Cupertino TIA Sncersaccion Caleulaciwta Level Oi 9arvlce Compvtatirm Report 7000 HC79 operatiaas I4ethcd (Future Valuate Alternative) a+aa•r••+aaa•+a•aaaaaaaa+sa•arf a.aaa+aa••*•saasaa•aa\aaa.a..aa{+rer••as•a.+s.•. Inceraeceioa 87 3cavene Creek a Srandlay was aaH aaa{a{•raf••a••a•r•raraaf{•alryaaa•alaaaraa+ar{a arrraaaff ••f •f•{a•a•r}•• Cycle Isec)a 110 Critical Yol•/Cap.(x)t 0.78a L09s T3tM (beela 12 (YaRf4.0 sec) Average Delay (seC/vah)t 7-s-4 Optimal GyClea 75 [,oval O! sartrin: C- {+rr•••aa{aa of•a!a{•a!•ar{raawa•ra{a•N•{}•{{r{aaaaaaararaw•a•arrr{a•r#aaa{a e.t.a Approaeht North Sound SOUth Sound. ease Souad Mast Ibund MDVamenct L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R L- T- R .__---------I---------------II---------------II---------------EI----•----------I CbatrOlt Perndtead Pazmltcad Protected Protected Righter Seclude Include Saclut)e Tnc lttda Min. GYeens 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 1D 10 Linear 0 1 D O Y 0 1 O D 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 ------...---I---------------II---------------II------------_--{i---_.--.-------I Volume Modular Saes Vola 70 16 40 a89 16 113 443 1294 53 lOS 1123 107 Growth Ad}e L.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Dset 70 16 40 789 16 111 443 1794 53 105 1123 107 Added vol'r 0 o D D D o o D 0 0 0 0 Pasaar8yvols 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 IaiCial FYtt 70 16 40 2a9 16 111 443 3294 53 305 1123 307 veer Adjt l.o0 1.00 l.oa l.oD i.DO 1.00 l.oo l.o0 1.DO l.o0 1_DO i.Do PRP Adjs 0.97 0.92 0.97 0.91 0.l2 0.l2 0.9a 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.92 PRF Volv4ar 76 17 43 314 17 121 482 1907 38 114 1221 116 Reduce volt o 0 37 0 o el o a a3 0 0 to Reduced VO1= 7S 17 a 314 17 40 482 1407 38 114 3371 306 PCB Ad}t 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rR,F Ad}t 1.00 i.oo 1.00 i.oD 3.00 l.DO l.oo l.DO 3.00 l.oo l.aD 1.ao P'iaal VOl.t 76 17 8 31! 17 40 4B2 1407 3S 314 1713 106 .__.._._____I_______________II-______..______II...______..__-_ll.______.._.____1 Sacuracioa Plow Modular bat/I.utaa 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 AdjUetttraatt 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.92 1.00 0.42 0.92 0.99 0.95 IADeat 0.81 0.19 1.Ob 0.95 0.08 S.DO 1.OD 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.78 0.25 Fiaal 8at., 1465 335 1750 1708 94 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5191 449 ----------•-I---------------II-------------•-II---------------il---------------I GpaOity Atlalysia Module= Vol/Beet O.OS 0.05 0.00 0.18 0.14 0.03 0.29 0.15 0.02 0.07 0.24 0.14 Crit Movaat •f+a afro afaf Green Timee 15.9 26.9 a5.9 35.9 23.9 25.! 35.7 57.0 57.0 35.1 33.4 33.1 Volume/Cap= 0.72 0.27 0.07 0.75 0.78 0.14 0.75 0.45 0.04 0.40 0.78 0.74 Delay/Yetis 35.1 35.3 32.3 51.8 51.8 33-3 41.4 17.5 13.1 50.5 38.7 38.7 User ae1Ad}. l.oD l.oo l.o0 1.00 l.oo l.DD 1.0o i.DO 1.00 l.ao l.oD 3.00 AdjDel/Yetis 33-1 35.3 32.3 57.8 51.8 33.3 41.! 17.5 13.1 50.5 34.7 34.7 I,64 by MOVat !>t D{ ' C- D- D- C- D S R D Da RQ42kAvgOr 3 3 D 13 13 1 17 SO 1 4 16 18 raa• •aaaN aaaa•fraf•ra•N•••r•a{•aM{w•{#a{r Naf•a1 {f1f 11aaa{{wafa{arafwaaA•- NOtataOaaw reported is tM nt0tbsr Df care pee lane. Tnlfix 7.0.0735 (c) 2004 Dowling AsaoO. Licensed to CITY OF CVPETSIMO N J W (O LXibitnq DM Paak Thv OCC 11, 2007 14a30e33 Page 12-1 Cnpercin0 TIA Lnteraactioa Giculaticns ' Level Ot Service Cwtpttatitm Report 2000 RCM Operatlona Method li•Vtvra volume Altemeeive) fa#a••a•a•rarfa•a+•aaa•awf•{•{aaar•a•alaffaafa•aa•1aa{f {•afaa•4•af aaaa afaa•raa Intaraaction R8 Btellinq 8 Grsaolaaf r•1aa••a•a{a•a•••a•a••aa•aa••aaaafaaa•1{•aafaaa•ar•••r{Y •aa+A{•a#aw•a•{aar••••f• Cycle (sec>r BD Critical Vol./Cap.(%)= 0.737 LOSa Time (sect: 12 (Y+Rrl.O seal Average nalay (sec/vanlt ii.9 Optimal Cycle: 60 Laval rX 9esvicer Sr •aaa{aaa••a•••{a•a•«•r{arfa•a.•.a•{aaraar•aaa•arra•f •{•aa••a•aa aaaa Approaehr ~ North t3ovad 6euch Hould Bast 8otatd west Sword MWMlentr L -? - R L - T - P. L - T - A L - T R ------------1---------------II---------------II--------°-----II---------------f CoDtmlt Peratcced Permitted Partaittld Permitted A15htsr Iacluda laclvda Iaclude include Min. (draens 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 iD Laaaer 0 0 li 0 0, 0 0 11 0 D 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 It 0 0 _-_---------I---------------II---------------II----.-.--------II--.-.--.-.--.--I volume MOdulea Base VOIt 16 867 12 21 868 35 55 L1 25 2a 11 24 GmacD Adja 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. DD 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Iaitial Seas 16 587 11 21 Bfi8 3S 55 11 25 2! 21 24 Added 401 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D PaaaarSysrnia 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Initial Fucr LS 587 11 21 86s 35 55 11 25 24 al 74 User Adjc 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 Pi(F Adjt 0.l2 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.93 0.92 0.92 PSIF YOlvaea 17 638 13 23 993 38 60 12 27 2fi 23 26 Redact volt D D 1 D D a D o lz o a 10 Reduced Yolt 17 638 12 23 943 7i a0 12 15 16 27 a DC& Mjt 1.00 1.00 1,00 S.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Ad}a 1.00 1.C0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 S.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Piaal VOI.r 17 638 17 2a 943 36 SD 17 13 26 23 6 ____________ _______________Il_______._______II_____----.-----II_.-----.-.-----I Sattvcation Floe Modular Sat/Lmlar 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1100 1900 3900 Adjuatmaat= 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0,92 D. 92 0.92 0.42 0.97 0.91 Lancet 0.03 0.95 0.02 0.02 0.99 0.09 0.69 0.24 0.17 0.47 0.97 0.11 Piaal 6at.+ 9a 1473 37 40 ifia7 63 1204 291 306 870 776 194 ------------E---------------ll••-------------il---------------II---------------I Capacity Anelyais Modular VO1/Bats 0.39 0.3a 0.38 0.57 0.57 D. 57 0.05 0.05 0_05 0.03 0.03 0.03 Csit MOVea: aaa• aaaa Green Time. 56.0 Sa.O 58-0 58.0 59.0 98.0 10.0 10.0 IO.D 10.0 I0.0 10.0 Volterra/Copt 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.25 0.25 0.25 Dllay/Vehc 6.5 6.8 6.5 L2.L 12.1 12.1 37.8 37.5 3?_8 34.1 34.4 34.4 Uear De lAd}s 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Dal/Vttht fi.5 6.5 fi.5 12.1 12.1 12.1 37.5 37.9 37.5 34.4 34.9 34.9 1'.09 Dy't4DVea A A A H S' 8 D+ D{ D+ C- C- NCM2kAVgt]s 4 6 8 19 39 19 3 3 3 a 7 2 araea#a{+••ar••aa•a•aaaaaaafa.a•awa r{•a•awaasaa..aw•raaaaaa•aaaaarasaaraaaa•ar•a 3bt~s pueua rap0rtted is the number O! taro par lane. Traffix ?-8.0715 (C) 2006 Howl inS AsaOC. LLcaOSad c0 CITY OP WP6iCI'INO 0 v n N OtTI0Jt8d[L) d0 ]LTA of pssas7}4 •~ossr SaTT~o¢ f00L IO) SuD•B•L Y'FITesS •sasT asd axio ;0 ze4Dma ay7 aT pa7sodas saaro 'a~0ei N i-Y N1H{rY---•N•N ••N•Nr-•I •••i!H!I•IY1•Y l4•T1•lYYr•~MNrar•N-Y1•NrlYr S OI 9 ST ST 9 LS LT IS 6 i 5 =L16Aifl[LYDN J H -J -J 6 -a -J ¢ -J -~ ¢ +tAOW .Lq 60'I f'fL L'aL L'i9 L'if L'6E 0'i6 9'CE 9'Ef L'if 6'it 6'iE E'05 +qsA/Ta¢LPY . 00'2 00'T 00'2 00'T 06'T 00'L DO't DO'T QO'T DO"T 00'T 00'T 'GPViw sash f'OS L'EL L'69 C'iE L'iE 0'!f f'CE f'tt L'-t E'iE •i'iE E'DS r[jal~/dp[a(I !0'0 OL'0 i9.0 if'0 i8'0 OL'0 LB'0 L6'0 -B'0 95.0 95.0 OL'0 'dy/aumTOA Y'EC t'EL f^L C'LC 'E'LC 9'TT L'6T c•62 E'fT 0'OL 0'DL f'a =amTt ass~,f NN Mr• •r•• -•rr rfaAOij OT~1 HO'0 LL'0 f0'0 Lf•0 Tf'0 TS'0 CL'0 LL'0 OL'O LO'0 LO'0 BO'0 =afg/TOM1 I----- ----------I I---------------I I----- ---------- 'sLaDOW ^T~LH1f daTnedaJ OSLI 006T OSLT tEf Bs iT OSLS i5f I 9ifL OSLT I---------------I---•-------- CLC LciC OSLt ='DnS LeOT,t DO'T 00'T 06'L ft'0 ZE'D 00'L Lt'0 ES'T DO`T ST'0 Si'L 00'L +iBIIWI Ci'0 00'T L6'0 Si"0 S6'0 Li'0 Sf'0 si'0 C6'0 96.0 B6'0 c6.0 '7asislsn~ 006T 006t 0061 006T 006T OOit 006T 006T 006T DOaT OOSt 006T +surT/]Y6 =aLoP~7 ~Ld a0T77si+3~ 9C 60i Sii TOT 09i 60t iiS ET9 65¢ OL i5L B¢L +•TOA L~Td 00'T . 00'T 00'L 00'L 00'L 00'T 00'S 00'T~00'T 00'L 00'T 00'T +EPa dDi 00'L 00't 00'2 00't 00't 00'L 00'S 00'T 00't 00't DO'L 00'T +GpY 9Jd fE GOi iiT TOS Oti 6Bt itT ETf !SE OC KL 6ET +Tat P~aPn'+l SEt 0 0 if 0 G SL O 0 6G 0 0 'LOA 7~aPfY L9T 60i 5iL 01T 051 Eft 66T ET9 i5f aL iSL 6ET +ssi0.[CA dHd La'0 Li'0 ci•0 C6'0 Li'0 Li'0 C6'0 Ci'0 L6'6 c6'0 Li'0 L6'0 'GpY d!!d 00'T 00'L QO'L QO't 00'T 00't 00't 00't 00't 00'T 00'T 00'I 'LP1l zsvn iST 9LE ECT 6LL iIi iLi EST i95 OEE LL iEL fCT =]Ri TeT7TaT 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 +LQbLHSasasd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' LoA POppi[ i52 9LE EET iLT 1Ti iL2 E9L i9f OCE LL ift I[T =sf[ LnT7T0I 00't 00'T 00'L DO'S 00'L 00'T 00'T 00't 00'T 08'T 00'T 06'T 'CPY q>"a]O i5T 9LE ECt iCT iti iLt COT i95 OEE LL iFL BLT =LOA sseH I------ . ---------I ~--------------- I I--.__- --------- ra[npoµ aumLoA ----- - 2 0 T 0 L O~ T D 0 L 0 T I T• D L -- ------- ~-....------- i 0 T L 0 L +saOaZ OL OT L OT OT L OT OT L OT OL L +tna10 'OTM K~L~I aDaTOn2 agnLOOl aPOTosu +sagbTa Ps7on7oxd pa7]s3osd Psiaaiosd Ps»a7o.xd =LoY7wJ u- s- Z Y- Z- Z a- t- Z 8- t- Z +7nruwr~olt PCB afsH P~oH gsa3 Dm1o8 tiT]OO6 PTnpH q7=olE 'g7nnzddY •+ N•--N••••.•r••••ara•Y•r••r-•rrrNrsN•N N•N N•••r•••N r•-Y•+••r•aa-! • f- +O +aOTnta4 70 T~Rn'I 69 'ataU LnmT]dp L'LE + Igan/oasl ~ia¢ s6a7anY loss 0'f•8-al CT +(aas) sm[y seal S6C '0 'lY)'daJ/'TOA tnOT]T=J SL 'IOas) •tO~7 ••Hrrr ••r-a-•NYs?•NNY!••Nr•r N•••rN NN•••N-•• Na•!r•••s Nra•ra•tNN•rN asLja'CJOi! 'i 8¢TtTa78 is noT]aas707ui •N N•• •••~N r-rNN-••• ••a •Y•NrrYYNN• N N•N-wN•••r•NN••r•••YHIl1N•f•• (iAF7R+izaaTY ~n+TW1 ~m]OdI pog7sta auoT]p7sdp iVJ}I OOOc uoday uoT]aanducp aOTnsaS i0 Tana7 awTDnt+'~inJ aOT]Oas za7ul YIi OOTtiadN T-fT s6ad EE'OE=Y T LOOL 'T2 ]gyp ^qy ~ r[nM Hd Bu]TSTxH 8xiacing +ATI AM Peak Thu Oct 11, 2007 1i+19~12 Page 1-I Cuperrin0 TIA IDCeraeCt100 Calculati0rw geenarie Report , 9CenariO~ ~ Exlatin9 * ArI AM weak Comvand, Existing + ATI + Pzoj eCt aN Volume: Esiating + ATI AM Peak Hour lieoae!crye Pxifcing + ATI AH 2ttQ~act Faa, Dalaalc imp:ec sos Trip CeneraCion: Ilona Trip Distribution: Daily Paths, Dalavlc P6tha Bantus Del cult Routes Conliguraciono pelanlt Conllguracion Tra1lLx 7.8.0715 (C) 200f Dowling Aae0c. Liceaasd to C3TY 0$ CDPSR'TINO a%iating . ATY AM Peak Fhv Oct ii, 2007 1a+19+31 Page 7-1 Cupertino Tin iacuaection Calculaclons Trip Distribuciacl Repeae Pertmt 0! ?zlps De11y To tiacae 1 2 3 4 S 6 Zohe ..____ _____ _____ _____ ____.. .-.._- 1 X0.0 30.0 S.0 7.0 3.D '15.0 Trailix 7.A.0715 IC) 2006 Dow11AQ ASaW. LSCeneld to CITY OF CUPEP.TINO N V A Existing + ATI AM Peak Thu Oct 11, 2007 14,19,11 page 3-1 Cupertilxf T7;A Sntarstccion Cal cUlations Turaiag Movement Report Nofle Volunr laorthbau7'A Southbound Eastbou06 IheLbound Total Type LfG Thty RighC Lett,Th171 Aight Left Thru Right Lett Thru Right vOlane Y1 BLevaeu Creak ^ Bubb Rd Base 14.1 ii 505 93 37 50 1< 779 87 S07 864 35 3116 Added D o D o D D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 111 11 SOS 73 27 BO 14 779 87 507 861 3S 3118 S2 Scevtas Crttk 8 Mary Ave Hose 37 6 29 70 11 172 7ia 1016 640 217 845 67 3324 Added 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 ~0 D 0 0 0 Total 3'% 6 29 70 11 177 714 1016 640 217 843 67 3324 N3 Ctevttls Creek i 9B 85 Rasps Sae! 0 ~0 0 1087 0 101 4 1174 180 206 692 D 3410 Added , D D o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a Total 0 0 0 1067 0~ 701 0 1174 i80 306 892 D 1420 A4 Stevens Creak a IIB e3 Rapg7s . Bane 40 101 D 220 9 485 681 1574 0 0 623 533 488/ Added D a o D D o o D o a D o 0 Total 40 101 D 2]e 5 485 681 3174 0 0 823 633 4289 E5 Stevgns Creek A Stalling Rd Hasa 393 SS7 14B 313 3S4 731 257 477 193 071 821 143 4484 Added D O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 Total 393 S57 240 213 3S1 231 2S2 477 19I 871 821 143 4454 $6 9tevene Creak 4 BA1CH Baca 0 0 0 34 D 107 259 1124 ' O 0 977 60 2557 JWded 0 0 0 0 D 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 p Total 0 0 0 34 0, 102 2bf 1224 0 D !77 60 2557' 4'7 8tlv'e0e CCaek R SraMlly ' Base 14 B4 2 36 9 74 150 754 20 ]8 13]'7 108 2306 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total ll 2l 2 30 9 14 180 7S4 20 28 1237 108 2306 8B stalling B Oretnleaf 8aN 14 672 24 9 605 30 109 20 32 74 lb J2 1616 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 14 672 24 9 80S b0 1D9 20 72 74 1S J] 1616 !9 Sct111ag i McClellan SeN 713 888 78 w '89 69 292 251 41 58' 295 1S9 2341 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 213 688 75 113 89 69 292 251 li 58 29S 1.59 2341 Trai till 7.8.0719 (e) 2006 DON].LaQ ASSOC. Licaased CO CITY ~ CUPERTINO N V A N 9kiattng + ASI AM Feak Thu OCC ]1, 1007 Sa:19r23 Page 4-i Cuyertia0 TIA Iateraeetion Calculations IrtgaCt Analyel8 Tleport Levu Ot Service Fnurtacti~ Hass FnLLLri Change Del/ V/ DsI/ V/ in ' [AB Veh C LOB Veh C N 1 bttv~s Grtek 8 Bubb Rt! C- 37.0 0.639 C- 33.0 0.639 + 0.000 D/V 9 2 Stevaaa Creek a Idexy Ave C+ 22.2 0.451 Cr 21.2 0.451 + 0.000 D/V N 3 8tevetu Creek i SB 85 Ramps C 18.6 0.521 C ]11.6 0.5]3 « 0.000 D/V N• 4 8teveae Crack i 37B DS Raa~e C- 37.D O.iB3 C- 33.9 0_687 + 0.000 D/V M S ![evens Creek 4 Stelliag Rd D 39.4 0.739 D 78.4 0.759 • O.ODO D/V ' • 6 elevens Creek 4 SAICR B 13:7 0.311' 8 53.7 0.391 + 0.000 D/V 9 7 BCevena Creek G Brandl4y D 16.7 0.404 8 16.7 0.404 + 0.000 D/V ' 8 8 6Ct111ng S Greaaleat B 13.2 0.619 B 13.1 0.618 + 0.000 DN 9 9 6Le11 Sag B HcClellen D 44.5 0.705 b 41-5 0.709 + 0.000 D/V Tlaitix 7.8.0715 Sc) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF Ct1FBRTINO N v A. W 9:citCiaS + ATI API Peak Tau Oct 11, 2DO7 14:19=31 Page 5-1 Cupertino TIA intarasction Calcula clone Lcxl 0! Sazvi c• Computation Report zooo RCl4 operations Hathod (Future Veluma Alternaciva) •rarer~a:•a•aafr••r•ra•ra•aaarae••f••w••farweaaaf ra+rar+rar•a•a•aa•f aarar•rrrr I~eraaccias }1 aCavena Creek r Bubb Rd ••aaMffr•1aa1a1•far•fr•aarrra••rr area N+a•oaf la afaaaa+ar+ar••a•aaar•aar•••••aaf Cycle laec)= 120 Critical Vol./Cep. (XI= D.639 Lose Sims laacls 12 (x+R.4.0 sac) Average Delay (sec/vah)e 31.0 Optical Cyela+ s4 Level Ot SesvSce= C- erraaaaaaafrala•arlNrra of r•••!fa•laarraarr•araaa•a4 alafaaf aarar•aRlf afaffa+a+f1 Apprpaeh: North Bound soneh Round Raat Round MaBC hound Movansant= L- F- R L- T- A L - T- R L- T - R ------------f---------------fl---------------11---------------II---------------I COatrols bblic Pease SDlic Phass Protected Protected Aights+ Ovl Seclude Inolude include Min. 6rae11r 7 10 iD 7 SO SO 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lal7ear D l 0 D ] 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 --.--.--.-.-I---------------II---------------II--___-...-.----11-----..-.--.---I volum4 Module= Reee Vol. 144 11 BDS 93 17 50 1t 779 t7 SD7 064 35 GrOwE17 Adje 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ].00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.90 1.00 Initial @u= 144 11 509 9] 27 SO 1a 779 07 907 064 a5 Added Vol= O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0. 0 0 0 0 PaaaerByVOls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial TLLte 144 it 505 93 17 90 14 779 07 507 064 15 user Adje l.oD 1.00 l.oo l.oD 2.DO i.oD l.o0 1.DD 1.00 1.0o i. DO 1.00 PED? Adjs 0.91 0.92 0-92 0.92 0.91 0.11 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92' 0.91 F8F Volwrw. 1S7 12 549 101 -19 94 15 047 95 551 939 38 Radt+Ct Vol. 0 0 146 a D 47 D 0 65 0 0 3 Reduced Vole 157 12 403 101 29 7 15 847 ]D 561 939 35 PCa2 AcMJ+ 1~D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Asir 1.DO i.oo 1.00 1.00 l.DO l.oo l.oo i.oo 1.DD i.oD S.oo 1.00 Final vol.= 257 12 403 l0i 29 7 15 847 30 551 939 3S ------------1---------------II---------------II-------------°il---------------I Saturation Flow MOdulee 8aC/L6IIa+ 1900 1900 SDOO 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1800 1900 Adjustment. 0.95 0.95 0.03 0.92 1.00 0.91 0.92 1.00 0.91 0.88 0.97 0.lS Lanaae 0.93 0.07 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.97 D.OT FSna2 SaC.: 1672 119 3150 1750 1900 175D 1750 3800. 1750 3350 3967 133 -.--.-....-- -----------II ...............II-------_'-_-'_-Il-_-------------i Capacity Analysis ltedulae Voi/bat: 0.09 0.09 0.17 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.22 0.02 0.17 0.28 0.26 Crit MOVaa. agar •••r fan• -ran Greer Time. 17.6 17.6 50.5 10.9 10.9 10.4 13-6 a1.9 41.9 31.9 61.2 81.2 Volume/Caps 0.89 0.64 0.30 0.64 0.17 0.05 0.06 D.64 0.05 0.61 0.52 0-52 Delay/Vans 59.5 59-5 23.7 T0.8 51.6 90,4 49.4 11.1 26.0 41.9 10.8 20.6 Uaar DelAdje 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 I.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Vahe 59.5 99.5 23.7 70.0 51.6 30.1 68.4 35.1 16.0 11.9 2D.6 20.6 LOS by MOVe: 3+ 8+ C i II- D D D+ C D Cr i4CM2k7nype 7 7 8 5 1 D 1 13 1 11 11 11 Mffffrarff aaaara}Nraraaaafra-araafar••a••rafll rlaraaaarf rrrlfa•araa•Nfarfaarr Note= Quaua reported 18 the aumDar ar care pez lane. Trattix 7.0.0719 (0) 1006 Dowling Assoc- Liceaaed t0 CITY DF CDPE9:lISO Dciacing + ATI AK Peak Thu Oct 11, 2007 14+19.11 Page 6-1 Cuperti7w TIA xncersectlOn Calculaclons Level Ot Ssxvlca COOpute Clcm Report 10D0 HCM Oparatlona Hethod (Future Volur:ra AlterasLive) raarraaaaar•au+ar«a+aa+r•••rra•aaa•aarar•e•aa•r.f.f ••raarafrra•araarrfar N•Ha Intezaeeti0n }z Stat,sna Cr+ak a Mary Ave aarrarrrraaaaaaaraar••aaa•aafrarfaaralaafrr as rlaaaarra ar afr•a•aa•a N•aa-r+•+f era Cycle Isecl+ 7t Cri Beal Vol-/Cap_IX1r 0.451 Loss Time (see)r 11 (Y+R~1.0 eat) Average Delay (sec/veh). 21.2 Optimal Cycle= 48 Level O[ Services C+ fararara•r•f•arafra+•ra•.+.•aafarrarr•fr•ra•frrfeafaar raarffrrf•rara•rrfa•r.rear ADDronCh= NOrtA BOUnd South Hound Bast Bound MeeC Round Pfovemant: L - T - R L- T - R~ L - T- A L- ,T - A _-----.--.__~_______________II____-___-------~~.--_-._____-___II____________-._I Control: Protected Protected Protected Proeactad Rightse Seclude Include Include Seclude Min. Oraene 7 10 30 7 30 30 7 10 10 7 10 SO Iaaea+ 2 0 0 1 O' 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 ] 0 1 ------------~---------------II---------------~~.--.-------~---il---------------f. Volume Modulsr Box VOlr 37 6 19 7D 31 172 114 2016 840 217 949 67 Growth Adj: i.oo I.oo 1.00 l.oo l.DD 1.00 1.00 l.DD l.DD 1.00 l.DD i.oo Iaicial Raa= 37 d 2! 70 12 172 221 1018 640 117 a45 67 Added Vols 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PataerByVOlr •0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 a 0 Initial Flit= 37 8 19 70 li 172 114 1018 640 717 999 67 user Aaj= 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 P1Q' Adjr 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.12 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 pAF VOllaae= 40 7 22 76 .11 187 ,233 1104. 696 238 919 73 RaduCC Vol: D D 15 D a 115 0 0 548 0 0 57 Reduced Val+ 40 7 7 76 12 41 233 1104 148 138 918 18 PCR Adj= 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adi= 1.0o i.DO l.oo l.DO i.oD• l.DO i.oo 1.00 l.ao l.o0 1.00 l.oo Yinal Vci.: 40 7 7 76 11 42 233 1104 148 236 918 18 Saturation Flow Module= eat/Lane+ 1900 1900 2900 1900 1900 1900 19D0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment. 0.81 D.9S 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 tl.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 LarieBr 2.00 0.90 0.90 1.00 1.00 S. DO 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.D0 1.00 Ftn.t Sac.+ 3150 900 900 1750 1900 1780 1700 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 ------------i---------------II---------------II._.__......----II-.-_----..----i. Capacity Annlysis,Madulsr Vol/Sat= 0-OS 0-D2 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.02 0.13 0.19 0.06 D.13 0.16 0-01 Crit MOVa1r ••rr r•ff ase• Grasp T1mer 7.0 10.0 10.0 f7'D 10.0 10.0 20.9 17.1 27.1 18.9 29.2 29.2 Volume/Cap: 0.1< 0.09 0.05 0.47 0.09 0.19 0.48 0.54 0.23 0.54 0.4B 0.03 Dal ay/VChs 32.1 1S.B 28.A 41.5 28.7 30.5 3s.0 20.0 17.5 29.9 20.8 18.A user DalAdj= 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDal/Vahr 72.2 lt.t 2t.t 43.5 1A.7 30.5 16.0 20.0 17.9 28.! 20.6 Sd.t L0.4 by Move= C- C C D C ' C C H- ~ R C C+ RC1S2kAvg0= 1 0 0 2 0 1 3 7 3 6 8 0 arar•ua•r•raarrra arr afaa•aaraaraa•a•+r afaf•r+a•aarfaf r•rrarrraaraa-aaaaaarrasaa Rote= pueue reported is tea matter or care per lane_ Tract is 7.1.0715 (C) 2006 Deal ing Aaaoc. Cleansed t0 CITY OF CVPRRTI110 Euiatiag r.ATI AH Seek Thu Oct 11, 2007 fro s19+11 Page 7-1 Cupertino T1A Snterse0cion Calcvlaciona Leval of Service Computation Report 2006 BC71 CpeYAtiala natlfod (FV.CVra volume Alterna tiVe) aa•rrr•rralif•rfH•r•Nwf•frfa•fa•fw•ifw•1rw•r1r•rrrarrN arfr•r•/•af rr••Hrrr/r• lntersaeeion 113 9CeveaB Creak 4 SB a5 Rates • • ••r•r•Irrrr rr•r•r••fN••f••e•fff•fff•raarrrfr•afrfrfw•aw Nf••rr/•wMrrlf Cytlef (saCSe 120 Critical Vol./Cap. IE1, 0.513 Lose Mnr .(see)r 9 IY+Rw1.0 Ntl Average Delay lssc/veh)+ 28.6 Optimal Cycler 18 Laval Oi Services C rwr Mr•f M•Hrf •fr••H•a rwlar H•Nf MN N•/r••afa•aa •r•fra f•f r•r•rM/N•/Yar Hr• Approachs Nereh Barad South Betmd Bast Bovad lASt Barad MOVel0a0te L- T - R L- T- A L- T- A L- T- R ------------I---------------11---------------I1---------._...-II------------•--I Control: Permitted Protected Fgrmitted Protected Alshta: Seclude inelada Zaciude Include M7.7t. Oraeas 7 10 30 7 10 10 7 30 10• 7 30 10 Lmeer a D D a D 7 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 •2 0 2 0 0 VolOme 4)Odnlee Ease Val: D O 0 1067 0 101 Ororcb Adjr l.DD l.DO 1-Da l.oD.l.oo l.Do Initial Bees D 0 D 1067 D 101 Added Vo1s 0 o D 0 0 0 PaeserByVOls 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Ftlta 0 0 0 lOd7 D 101 user Adjs 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 P8F Adj+ 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.92 0-92 18F VOliaOes 0 0 0 1180 0 110 Redact Volr 0 0 D 0 0 62 Reduces ubL D 0 0 1adD o .a DcF Adze 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 !0'X Adj, 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FLvl Vol., 0 A 0 1160 0 4a 0 1174 1a0 296 897 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 0 1174 180 206 692 0 0 0 0 6 D. 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 1174 1s0 208 897 0 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 0.93 0.91 0.91 0.92 O.D1 0.92 0 1176 •196 274 763 0 o D Sae o D o 0 127d d4 214 751 0 1.00 1.00 2.OD 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1274 d4 234 752 0 Saturation FlOr Nodules gat/Lens, 1900 1906 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1800 L900 1900 1900 AdjttatOMats 0.91 1.00. 0.92 O.d7 1.00 0.91 0.92 0.99 0.99 D.t3 1.OD 0.91 Lsaes, 0.00 0.00 0.00 ].OD 0,00 1.00 0.00 ].BO 0.10 2.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat-e 0 0 6 4950 D 1750 0 7143 356 3150 3900 0 --•--.....--~---------------II.-..-.......---II-._--------.---II--.......------I Capacity Analysis Nodular vol/Sat. o.oo o-oo o.o0 0.23 0.00 0.03 D.oD 0.19 a.le o.D7 0.20 0.00 Crit F10veat rr•r rwrr /•rr Breen TSmer 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.7 0,0 81.7 0.0 41.0 41.0 1d.7 a7.; 0,0 Volwb/Cape 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.57 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.5E O.SI 0.92 0.41 0.00 Delay/veh+ 0-0 0.0 0.0 24.8 0.0 19.0 0-0 72-5 31.5 52 .! 21.1 0.0 user Da1Adj: 1-DO 1.DD l.DO S.oa l.oo S.oD l.oa l.oD 1,DO i,oo l,ao l.ao Adj Dal/veh, o.o o.o a.D 24.9 D.D 19.0 o,a 32.s 32.s 52.8 11.1 0.0 LOB by llove+ A A A C A B- A ~ C- •' C- D- Cr B1?12kAVpC<s 0 0 0 17 D 1 0 10 10 5 ! 0 !••aw•f1•rrr•ffaran/rrr•rwre•••arr.a•rrf/•ra••seas•ar•1r•rwrfr••w•wa•wfa•••falrr Mbter 4unu reported is the mambas of tars par Ssas, Traltix 7.1.0719 (el 2006 Dovling Assoc. Lieaaded to CITr aF COPSR'i IL40 N V A A bci acing + ATI AN Veak Thu Oct 11. 7047 14 +19s11 Pagt 8-1 CUperciao TIA LntrrsaCtlOn Calculatians Leval Of Service Coeputation RepOrC ID00 8CM OperaCloO.e Metbod (FUtgre VOlUme AltarnatiVe) of al Malr•rff••!•••/a•a••••/rar/arrr•ar•rrwlrrr r•rr•rrrrfaH arfa•rwlraf•rrr••/rr Inieraecclon f4 Stevens Creek s NB 89 Ramps .alit••1r•rffN ra•afr••••••aftweleea•ffa••••raf•+r•••fr•1 ir•r!•rraraf•rr Cycle Isec), SID CriCitai Vol./Cap.(R)+ 0.681 L09a Time (sec), 12 (Y+R~4.0 sac) Average Delay (sec/veh). 33.9 Optima] Cycles 5! Lwel OL Service. C- •rrr.rrr•ar••r•r•••••aaararru rar«f••r•a•ru•••frrrre••arr•rr••r•rf •••••aaaa••r Approuhr Noreh Bound 9outb Bound east Bound Raat Bound Novemencr L- T- R L - T- R L - T - A L T- R ---_--°---I---------------~~ ...............II-----..------.-II-__-_---°------I Control+ Split 9haN Split Phase ProGCCad permitted Rights: Include include Include tgnora Nia. OYaenr 7 30 10 7 10 10 7 10 30 7 30 10 Laaes+ 0 1 1 o D" D 0 Si 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 D 1 6 1 volume Nodules Base Vol. 40 101 0 21e 5 445 601 1374 0 0 622 533 f3rOMth Adj+ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bed: .40 101 0 228 5 485 881 157! 0 0 622 513 Added Vo1s 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 PasprByVOlr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut. 40 101 0 229 5 4a5 681 1574 O 0 612 533 User Tdj+ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 I+F[R Adjr 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 O.f2 0.92 D-92 0-92 0-92 0.92 0.91 0_00 PHF wlume: 43 120 0 14d 5 •527 740 1711 0 0 676 0 Redact Vol+ 0 0 0 0 0 168 0 O D 0 0 4]7 Reduced Vol, 42 110 0 248 S 259 740 1711 0 0 676 0 PC6 Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.06 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MIp Adyt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 0.00 Final Vol., 43 110 0 248 S 259 740 1711 0 0 676 0 Saturatiaa Floe Module+ sat/Idne+ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 mjwtnsmts 0.95 0.98 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.97 O.B3 1.C0 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lsnes+ 0.58 1-4a 0:00 0.65 0.01 1.34 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.. 1019 2690 0 1133 14 23t7 3150 5700 •0 0 5700 17b0 ------------ ----------"II---------------II--..-_____--__-II-----_-_--__..-I CBDaciey yale NDdulee vol/Eacr a.o4 D.D4 o.aD 0.22 D.z2 D,u 0.23 a.so a.DD D.DD 0'.12 o.oD G7:St Novae. arrr wr •r •rr• rrrr GMeA Timss 10.0 10.0 0-0 37.5 37.5 77.9 40.1 60•S 0.0 0.0 20.3 0.0 Volume/Cap+ 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.35 0-70 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 Delay/Vehr 98.2 98.2 0.0 81.9 41.9 32.8 38.8 72.0 0-0 0.0 51.2 0.0 user DelAdjt 1.00 l.DO 1.00 L.ao l.DO l.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o L.oa 1.00 Adjnel/Vehe 58.2 59.2 6.0 41.9 41.9 32.6 38.5 22.0 0.0 0.0 51.2 0,0 L09 by Mevi, r+ B• A D D C- Dr C+ A A D- Ri?t2kAvgQr 3 3 0 14 14 6 15 15 0 0 9 0 •w•rf•rar••ff•wr+wa•f•fr•ra/f•rraN•w/wa••rrwara•/f rwfrH N•aa as rrrK awa•Ir•wrr• woeae 4uauo reported is'ehe number of tars per lma. TrailSu 7.8.0719 (c) 2006 AoYliag Assoc. Liceaaed w CITT OF CUPERTIl~ B7t16tiag + ATI AN Dank TMs Oct 11, 2007 14,19ri1 Paga !-1 CnparClno TIA InterasctiOn Cal eulations Level Of service Compvcacion Report 3000 FRlt OpereCioas N9thcd IpuLUre Volunu A1LarSa t3Ve1 •f1f\f\fa\aH aa••laafrfaaN if•\f\•f\ra••••a\•a\Na\aaf a•f•fa•1•ai•a lfaa\••a\•\f• intersecticts O9 9tavetis CCeek s ete111ag Ad sera.r•••+•.a•+•w••rr•ra•+a•a•fares.aarrrw••••ear•aaaa•faff+N••aw+••a•aa•ar•raa Cye14 (ea=)r !0 Cit1OS4 Vel./Cap.(X1, 0.75! Seas Tiros IsecJ+ 17 (Y+R>'4.0 secl Awraga Delay (sdc/vehlr 39.4 Optimal Cycles 67 Laval Of Sezvicss D a•aaa•\••araa•••••a•«a•••aafaaaaerf•••••a•a.•••«••a ar•aawrf •a••+r••a••••a ufa• Approach= North Bound South HOta7d Bvt Panssd Nest Bound MOVemmt r L- T- A L- T - R L- T- A L- T- R ------------L---------y ----Il---------------II---------------II---------------I COSStroi= PtOC4C-ad Protected Pmtecced PCOUCtad AighLar lrscluda IaC10da Include ZaC1VG M1a. Greens 7 10 16 7 10 10 7. SO 10 7 30 10 Lama s 1 D 2 0 1 1 0 1 D x 1 0 3 1 0 3 0 3 0 1 --.-____-_--I---------------Ii---------------II-.-.....--.--.-II----.----._.._.I Volume Modu3.ss Babe Val: 393 497 24a 317 354 731 747 477 193 671 a72 143 GroNth Adjr 1.00 1.oD 1.00 1.00 1.OD i.DD l.DD 1.00 1.00 I.oD 3.0o L.DD Initial Bser 307 437 74e 713 354 231 352 477 193 471 e33 143 Added Volr 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D 0 0 D D PaafarByvelr 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IpLCial FuCS 393 557 748 713 344 231 751 477 193 971 eI3 143 per Adja 1.00 3.00 S.pO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 D%F Aaj, 0.91 0.97 D.l7 0.92 0.93 0.92 0,31 0.97 0.93 0.97 0.93 0.37 PAF Vo1sDw+ 477 605 270 231 365 791 274 918 710 671 993 184 ReduCt VO1s~ 0 0 304 O• 0~ 206 0 0 81 0 0 177 Reduced YOer 477 605 66 132 3eB d5 274 519 •17! 671 997 33 Pc73 Adjr i.DO i.a6 1.00 1.66 1.00 1. Da l.oD i,oo 1.60 l.DD 1.06 1.DD MLF Adjs 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ftaal Vel.r 437 '605 86 732 799 45 174 !Se 17! 621 697 73 9aLaratioa Ploy Modnla: Bat/Liaar 1100 1900 1900 1900 1900 1lOG 1900 1900 3900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuatsmtc, 0.97 1.00 0.92 0.97 1.00 0.92 0.91 0.38 0.98 0.93 1.00 0.92 Ieaess 1.06 7.00 1.00 1.00 7.00 1.00 1,00 2.36 0.62 1.00 3.00 1.Op SSnal Sat_. 1750 3800 17$0 1790 3900 1750 1750 0486 1114 3190 5700 1750 Capacity Analysis Modular Vol/Bats 0.74 0.18 0.04 0.13 0.10 0.03 0.18 0.12 0.13 0.20 0.16 0.07 Crit MOVa4r f•e• f•ff raa• \•r• Glean Tisues 29.9 73.6 23.4 1e.6 17.0 13.0 I6.S 13.7 17.7 23.a 38.5 '18.5 Volume/Cepr 0.76 0.64 0.16 0.64 0.76 0.19 0.76 0.76 0.7i 0,76 0:76 0.09 Dal ry/Vehr 36.7 33.6 17.1 41.1 47.8 36.5 47.7 41.9 41.8 37.3 38.3 '79.4 Veer DelAdja 1.00 1.00 i_oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i_oo 1.00 1.00 x.00 1_00 AdjDe1/veEr: 36.7 33.6 17.1 41.3 47.9 36.8 47.7 67.9' 42.9 37.3 39.3 39.6 LOS by Mover Da C- C "D D D• D D D ~ D+ D+ %CPl2kAVgQ, 13 8 7 7 7 1 10 8 9 11 10 1 a•HaNr\af•faff•fa•••fffr•falfr•\r••faa•af\afA•r•af a\afi•rariaraf•NfawR\N •f ?bee: Quau4 reported is the mx4ber o[ cars Der lava. ' Tzarrix 7.9.0719 (cl 300a Oot+liag Assoc. Licensed to CISY OF CUP6RTIN0 fV V A N 3isciating + ATi AH Peak Thn OCC 11, 2007 14,19:11 Page 10-1 Cupertino TYA xaeeraection Calculations Level 01 Service COD$utaCiOn P.eporC TODD %CTt Operatlona Method (Future Volimse Altarssativel •afa\r1f•\•••••fNi•aaa waf leas.afr4af•r•a•a•a•••wffaraaaRf•Raaal alfaaff4aflf Rff\ Ir:teraecti0n D6 Stevens Crack & BAiCx a•a•afa waaa••••••••aa•rr•a•w••••aar•r•r••••••a•r••araa a•a•af•a aaaaar•a•aarafaf Cyale (sect's 110 Critical VO1./Cip.(X)s 0.]91 L099 Time (6ec1s 9 (Y+Rr4.0 aeD) Average Delay (Sec/veh)s 13.7 Optimal Cycle: 36 Level 6t Sarvicer H a\••ffrff•fwaa•f••f••ef+aaaaa wrH ••Rf•fr\f\\••aafa••a•a••a.f •f a••a-r a•r••r•a•• Approach: North Bound South BOW1d Bas[ Hwnd Heat 8ot0id MOVaIOPiitr L- T- R L- T - A L- T- A L- T- R ------------I---------------II------._.-.---•II---------------II------•--------I Cmemir Perndtted Pm tested 3?mceeted Permitted R1ghCSS include IaClude Include Include Mia. Greea: 7 30 10 7 10 i0 T ]0 30 7 SD 10 Laae9= 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 L 0 1 1 .0 3 0 0 O 0 7 0 1 .-------.--_I---------------It---------------II---------._.---II---------------I Volume Module. Baca Vols 0 0 0 34 0 103 159 1114 0 0 977 6D Orowch Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Baas 0 0 0 34 0 103 759 1114 0 D 977 80 Added V01= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 PasaerByVOls 0 0 D D 0 0 0 D D 0 0 0 In1L1a1 FUCs 0' 0 0 34 ~0 101 759 3131 0 0 977 60 VBer Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2. DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD FSF,Adjr 0.97 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.97 0.92 0-97 DAF VOlwOes 0 0 0 37 0 111 TBT 1122 0 0 1062 66 ReduOt VO1: 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 D 0 0 0 41 Reduced Vo1s 0 0 0 37 0 31 1e3 1222 0 0 1062 14 PCH Adjr l.oa l.o0 1.00 1.aa l.DD 1.oD l.o0 1.00 1.DO i.DD 1.06 1.Do MLF Adjs 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 i_00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.r 0 6 0 37 0 21, 292 1212 0 D 1067 l4 -.--------_-I---------------II.........-----_II----:..-.-.-..-II-------__----.-I 9aturatioa Flout Module: Bat/Cans: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 3900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.93 0.97 1.00 0.92 Lessasr 0.00 0.60 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final $at_: 0 0 0 S7SD 1900 1750 1750 5700 0 0 5700 1750 --------.---I---------------II------------...II--...---_-_--_-II...___._....._.I Capacity Malysis Nodular ' VO1/Sate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.36 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.01 Crie, aaoveat a•ae 1r•r rata Green Timer D.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 D.D 10.0 42.2 81.0 0.0 0.0 4e.9 4e.e Volume/Cap, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.42 0.26 0.00 O.Oa 0.42 0.03 [seley/vehs 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.9 0.0 47.7 76.9 7.7 0:0 0.0 71.4 17.3 Vser DelAdje 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 S.OD AdjDel/Vehr 0.0 0.0 0.0 d9.e D.O 47.7 26.9 7.7 O.0 0.0 71.4 17.3 I.OS by Move r A A A " D A D '~ C A A A Ca A %CN2kAVg0s D 0 0 3 0 1 6 3 0 0 9 0 fa•f•M ff\faf\aaf•aaf•af•wataA+a of a}fN•fa••4f as af•wfaaa /a •f•ar•1fa}afrrarfaff/• Hots: pueue ,sported is the number of Oars pez Saae. Trafllx 7.e.a715 (c) 7006 Dowling Assoc. Llcanaed to CITY OF CUP6ATSN0 N V A Or 6xif tang + AT1 AM peak Tfat OcG 11. 2007 14.19,11 Yag! 11-1 Cupertino TLA Inceraxtioo Calcaletiona Level OL Be1V1Ca Ca~puteLion Report 1000 NCN Oparatlooa Mecbod (Future Vol,mrs Alternative) .•••••a••e••aHHHaaaaa•ataaaaH aarH Hre•e•+w•••••HaHaHHrara •waraH+aw•ra Intersection 87 Stevane Ciwek a arendley a••H• •••.••a••Haa•Ha.••aa.•a Hfraa•rHrH Haaa•••awarrH.H aaHHHH•HHH Cycle (sac), 110 Critical vol./tap. tx), D.a Oa Loss Tiny (sec3: 11 1Y4Aa4.0 sae) Average Delay tent/vet), 16.7 Optimal Cycles 39 Laval O! Service, a aara+aHH•HraaH•HHar••••wH•••.ar•H arrr••wr•+•aa•rasaa H•HH•H •HH•H •• Approuh, North Bound South 8outul East Bound ~NeaL Bound MOyen,enL, L- T- R L- T- R L- I- R L- T R -_-..______-I_______________I~___-._._______-II_______________I~.___..__.-_____I Control, Paradttad Permitted Droteceed Frotet ted ASghter Include include include include Min. Oreanr 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 SD 10 Lanes, o ,1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 3 0 i 1 0 1 1 0 ------------I---------------II---------------li---------------II---------------I valu,0. Mtauler Dana vole 14 24 7 76 9 24 150 794 10 18 1137 106 C=t0wth Adj, 2.D0 1.00 1.00 1.Otl 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse, 14 24 2 ~ 3s 9 ]a 190 754 20 2p 1197 106 Added vol. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D o 0 9asaerayvol: 0 0 0 0 0 o D o 0 0 D 0 Initial Tit, 14 14 2 36 9 1{ 140 754 20 2B 1137 108 veer Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PRF Adj, 0.92 0.9] 0.97 0.87 0.91 0.91 0.l1 O.l2 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.91 PBY Volumes 16 16 2 39 f0 16 163 •610 as JO 1136 117 Redact Vols 0 0 2 0 0 17 O 0 9 0 D~ 10 Reduced VDlr 1S I9 0 39 1D 9 167 a20 17 30 1736 107 PCS Adj, l.oo l.DD 1.oD l.DD l.oD 1.6D l.o0 1.00 i.oo 1.6o i.oD 1.00 t{I7 Atlj, 1-00 1-00 S.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Filial VO1., IS 16 0 39 10 9 15] 010 17 30 1236 107 '--_________I---------------II-.----.-.-_-_-_II---.___._-.-..-il----.--.--.-.._~ 6ettintim !low Module, Sat/Lines 1900 1900 1900 1900 3906 1100 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuetawnt: 0_9S 0.95 0.91 0.95 0.9a O,f2 0.92 S.DO 0.47 0.91 0.99 0.93 tanner 0.37 0.63 1.00 6.60 0.20 1.00 1.00 ).00 1.00 1.00 2.75 0.25 Yinal eat.! 663 1137 1750 14a0 360 1740 1750 5700 1750 1760 5157 Oat ...__------- -~-------II---------------ll-----•---------II---------------1 Capacity yeia-Module, Vol/Bat! 0.01 0.61 0.00 0.03 D.03 0.01 0.09 0.14 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.14 Crit MOVeer ara• Hfa raH cream Tia,es 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 2a.6 Si.o 61.0 77.D 63.4 43.9 VOlnme/Cap! 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.30 0.30 O.Oi 0.42 D.76 0.01 0.07 0.92 0.91 Delay/Veh: 50.2 50.2 46.5 51.7 91.3 4s.a 39-8 11_9 11.0 32.1 13.1 13.4 Deer DelAdjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veutir 50.2 50-2 44.3 51.3 51.3 ac.a 79.8 11.9 11.0 31.1 13.9 17.9 L9e by Mover D' - D D- D- D D 8 8+ C- a q(ZtZkAVgOe 3 1 0 3 2 0 5 S O 1 8 9 • r1 H wf 1 as H • • •• H awe rH •• Ha Yaa 1 w • • • rwf rH • • ra aNa rH • aH ar r•a H can •a of a a ar ww as leoter queue repertad is tYr ntamer o! Bare per lane. TraLL1x 7.p.D716 te) 1006 Dowling Aeaoc. Licensed Ca CITY 0'F CUiERTINO 7DCi sting + ATI dM Ysak Thu Oct 11, 2007 1{s19,11 Faga 51-1 Cupertino TIA intereaction Calculatiate Level 0! 9ervi ce Conputatlat AepOrL 1000 RCD! Operetrona Method (Future Volume Alternative) a•aa•aaaaa#.r••••rwaaeri ral afra•raaaaar•wf area N-raraa Naa Hrraaraerr•f ra•••a•a Intersection 86 9Ce111ng 4 Greenlee! • •aaar•aa•Haa•aarr•a••ar•a•w•••rruaaaH •.a+a.+Hrw aHH•H•HH•Hr ••«a Cycle lax), 90 Critical Vol./cap. (X), 0.618 Loss T1me (sx7r 12 (Y+Raa.O aec) Average Ctlay (aec/veh), 13.2 Optimal Cyelee 49 Ltvel O! Service, 8 a•wraH rr+aHa HHrHHH H.•••a•H•Hwa•H•HHHaHr H•afaaH rHaHHHHrHH Approecbe North Bound South Bound Beat Bound srese Bound MOvemen is L- T - A L - T- A L- T- R L- T- A ______------I_______________~~-_.--.._-_____.II.-_.----..-...-I~..___-_____-___i Oonerol, Yrrmitced PeraLteced Permitted Permitted Fights, include include Include Include Nth. Green, 7 10 l0 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 LO La,tes, 0 0 ll 0 0 0 D 11 D 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 It 0 0 volume Hndvle, Hat! Vol, 14 572 2{ l1:oNth Adjr I.00 1.00 1.00 Lnltiel Bae, la 672 24 Added Volr 0 0 0 Paaaer8yvolr 0 0 0 Initial Fut. 14 672 14 User Adj, l.DO l.oD l.aD PDF Adj, 0.92 0-92 0.92 PIG! Volumes 15 730 26 Redact Vol: a 0 1 Radtlcad Volr 19 7]0 19 PCE Adj, l.oD 1.D6 l.Do MLY Adj, l.oD'1_DO l.oD Finel Vol.! 1D 730 25 3acurntion ow MOduler Sat/tartar 1900 1900 1900 Ad~NatmeRlr 0.91 0.92 0.97 tense, 0.01 0.93 0.03 71ne1 8aC-r 35 1558 57 ------------I--------------- Capxity ADalyeia Modules W1/8atc 0.14 O.N 0.94 Crit MOVesr a*•f OYem Tian 64.2 64.1 69.1 1Rrlume/C7g1, 0.62 0.61 0.61 Delay/Veh, 9.0 9.0 9.0 User DeLAdjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdiDel/Vthr 9.0 8.0 9.0 LOS by Mwe , A A A RC142141vg(jr 12 12 12 • rar ra • f r• a rH • a H • H H I• rH l Note. Quana reported Sa tba r 9 bas 1.00 1.00 9 605 ' 0 0 0 0 9 609 i.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 30 658 D O 10 656 1.aD l.oo 1.aD l.DD 10 656 I---------. il00 1100 0.92 0.92 0.01 0.92 2< 1601 i---------~ 0.41 0.41 64.1 61.1 O.SB 0.58 8.3 9.3 1.00 1.00 8.3 8.3 "A A li 11 H•H•Hal u7laber o! N s0 109 20 37 34 16 32 l.oD i.oD l.Da l.aD l.oo i.oo 1.00 50 109 2p 33 34 19 33 D D o 0 0 o D D D o o D D a SO 109 10 32 3i 15 32 1.DD l.oo l.DD i.DD 1.00 L.DO S.Do 0.92 0-91 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 54 118 12 38 37 15 3S 3 0 0 e 0 0 26 51 110 17 27 37 16 9 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.OD l.DD l.DD 1.00 I.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 ---Sl 118 21 17 37 16 9 li--____-._..--.-II---------------I 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.91 0.91 0.9I 0-92 0.92 0.92 0.92 O.D7 0.71 0.13 0.16 0.60 0..18 0.14 -113 12a2 115 281 10a2 460 248 ._ __-II ...............II--.__.-_..._.._i O.ll 0.20 0.10 0.10 O.OI 0.04 0.09 •Hr 64.1 13.9 13.9 13,9 13.9 13.9 13.9 0.36 0.62 0.62 6.62 0.23 0.13 0.23 8.3 tS.B aS.f 45.1 35.3 35.3 38.3 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 8.3 45.8 45.9 45.8 35.3 35.7 35_3 A D D D Da D+ D 11 6 6 6 7 1 2 w•a•!a•ar•Hrr•r1r Ha•H••H•••••a•••f H ~ per lane. Traltix 7.6.0718 tot 1006 Dowli~ Assoc. Licensed to CIT2 OP CUPERTINO 3D:tatlnQ + ATI AN 4eele, Thu Ott 11, 1007 ]4e19e11 Yage 23-1 Cupertino TIA intarae[tim i;alculations Level Ot 8erviee Carputation Report 7000 ACH Operaciona Hs shod 14'ucure Volucie 7lternatiVB) a•raRrrHHa••HfHHr•H Hfa•a••aw•«aaafH•H aa••HaHRHHHHHH•H H•HHa• intersection 1I9 8celling o McClellan Rf• HHaararlHaaH rf ran Hrar•+rff•wr1Rf•+•ffaR.f rRM RtH••aaH •+e+ae-e }f •a#rrf a Cycle laec): 120 Cri Beal Vol./~ep•1711e 0.7DS Loaa'T1aM (aselt 12 (Y«A.9.D eecl Averaya Delay IeeC/Vah)a 44.5 ppcimal Cycles 42 I,avsl OI Bervicar D ••a•aara•f+flR+•wr+wrraa•aa aflaH H•ra+Haa}aRHa frR••+aw•••wH awaaaHaH lrrf af• Approaaha AOrth Barad 9ouctt Barad Seat Barad Neat Baund 9aoveaxnta L- T- A L- T- A L- T- R L- T- A COnQ'Ola PrnteCCed FiOC41[t8d PIOtK'Led FYOtet CBd Aightaa Include Include Iaclula Irxluda Mi.n- Oreeaa 7 10 l0 7 10 30 7 10 lD 7 10 16 Lan85r 1 0 2 1 0 L 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 D 1 --......--.-I---------------II---------------ll--...-----.----II-_--_-_--.-_---I Volume tlodulaa Rasa Vol: 213 655 75 113 89 69 292 241 41 5b 295 i59 Groxth Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bsea 213 488 75 113 59 69 797 741 41 56 795 159 Added vo1 a D D D D D o 0 0 0 0 o D F:saerBy9ola 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 a 0 0 Initial FVCa 213 665 75 117 09 69 292 251 41 56 295 159 veer Adja 1.00 1.00 2.00 S.OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pffp Adjt 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0,82 0.97 P.[Da' Yolraoet 1J2 74a 57 111 87 79 317 273 45 61 321 173 Redact Yolr 0 0 36 0 0 Z3 D 0 11 0 0 144 Reduced VOla 277 768 46 123 97 S2 317 273 34 81 321 18 FCS Atha 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 )4,>' Adja 1.00 1.00 5.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.D0 Final YOl.a 737 74a 45 173 97 51 317 273 34 63 ]21 19 ------------i---------------II---------------II--_.-----------ll---------------I Batvration P'lor ltadulet " fiat/Lance 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Mjwtmsata 0.9Z 0.98 0.99 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 i_00 0.97 Idneer 1.00 1.85 0.12 1.00 1.78 0.71 1.OD 0.59 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.. 1750 3488 232 1750 1406 1793 1750 1603 397 1750 1900 1750 -°--.----.- --°-°^.-----II_______________fl---------------il----___._------I Cepaciey Aoa~yaie iwdula: VO1/Seta 0.17 0.11 O.ZI O.DT 0.04 0.04 0.15 0.17 D.17 0.03 0.17 O.OI Crlt MDVBee ••«w aaa. •rrf •Hf Crean Times 29.7 35.5 36.5 11.9 15.7 18.7 36.9 44.4 44.4 15.1 18.7 19.7 Volume/Cap: D.53 0-73 0-71 0-71 0.26 0.76 0.71 0.46 0.66 0.27 0.71 0_07 neley/Yeha 13.1 10.7 40.7 71.5 SS.6 45.6 49.4 31.0 3I.0 50.5 50.6 J5.6 Veer DelAdje 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDal/Vaifa 4I.9 •0.7 40.7 73.6 45.6 45-6 49-a J1-D 31.D 50.5 50.6 35.6 I.OB by HT~Ba D D D F D A D C" C D D D+ ACM1kAvgQ: 8 1! 14 f 3 3 13 9 ! Z 11 1 f-rwaef+Ha+HH+rHf HH•HHHraarrH rH frHrraR••a+*f•a•w H«HHHfar Rraaafaf ifOtae queue reported La Eha nuames o! case per lane_ Trettlx 7.e.0715 lel 1006 Da+liag Aasoa. Liaeasaed to CITY 09' CUFISRTiRO N V A V ai i M ~ ~~ i i N i . O 1 1 N 1 • /J • 1~.~aJ1l N 1 U t ~ i .1~1 I MMp Ian ~ V i 14 1 a 7. a Cp ~ i .~i i F b .e i ° O 1 LuY 1 O N I Y ~ ~ M 1 N ~ 1 .pr p.r11 'i i J i 11 ~ G 1 Y N N O N 1~ VV • b O ~ M ~ Q U 1 ~ ~ t ° l; H l q Fp+ ; c M F ~ p ; r R • .1 1 I ~ 1 • H 1 1 i ~ ~ A 1 ° N F i Y i 1 6 I 1 1 ry ~ ~ ~ • ^ 0 i i R • • a i c ~ i o ~ • i V + 01 1 1 Y N g N 1 ~ ~ Q ~ ~ a • m 1 :8: l y l Isl N ~ 1 . ei 1 M i V 1 ~y ~.{'LJp. H ; m~ I O ~ py: X n i W. O~ W°££ 1~p1 ~ ~ ~ N ~ • ~ 0. ~ ~t n • ~ ~ h ~ 4 t i• p ~ ~ wu ualu lu ^ rowar..aar ~1 ~ ~,~~bE~S8E~8 a. 1 ~ ~~ ~ 5 N ; i ~ ~ 1 w~ g •; _s:~ F ~ ~''" 5 i M ~ L D O b „O„ ~'1 U J8 yW 4 n n N n m r N a S A` e N 27 - 148 Fsdatinq + ATI PN Peek Thu Oat 11, 2007 19 r31r39 Pgge 3-1 Cupercim TIA Inceraaictioa Calculations Tuzniaq xovement RlpOYt Nnae Volume NortbbauM Southbound EaStb00i16 westbound Total Typo Lett TAru Righc LelL Thrit Righc Lett TF1rt1 Right Lelt 11fr11 Right VOluer NI 9cevens Creek ~ 8ubb Rd ease 9] 19 477 64 19 14 24 868 139 509 777 B4 3082 Added 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 93 19 477 64 19 14 24 868 139 509 777 89 3082 p2 Btevees Croak c xaxy Ave ' ease 245 23 48 152 38 124 368 1716 56fi 305 1186 123 5696 Addax D o o a a a o 0 a o 0 0 0 Total 245 23 48 152 38 124 388 1716 586 305 1168 123 4896 83 Stevp78 Creek & SB 85 Re71pe Base D D 0' 1205 6 751 0 1036 173 444 739' O 4354 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 b O 0 0 0 b 0 Total 0 0 0 1205 8 751 0 1016 i73 444 739 0 4354 84 staoeae Crank i DiB B5 RatlQa lase 54 283 0 258 1 530 493 1809 0 0 934 949 5409 Added 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 D 0 D 0 D 0 Total 54 263 0 298 1 530 491 1908 0 D 934 848 SsD9 N5 Stevens Creek E BCel3 ing Ad Base 331 346 414 36] 547 273 268 823 215 87! 1262 252 5965 Added 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 Total 331 346 434 383 i47 273 268 923 216 678 1282 252, 5965 ((6 etsrv4na Creak R BAICR Ya4te 0 O 0 % 0 167 33T 1983 0 0 1415 80 4086 Added 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 96 0 167 337 1993 0 0 1418 60 4088 117 Stevens Creek i 8randley lass 70 16 40 269 16 112 443 1560 43 lOS 1507 107 4338 Added 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 70 16 40 289 16 112 443 1580 ,53 105 1507 107 !]38 88 Stalling s (ireealea! sees 1! 657 22 21 968 35 55 it 23 14 21 24 1169 Added D 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 Tt,ta2 18 897 12 21 968 35 68 11 28 24 11 24 1189 09 etellfng i HcClellea Baas 128 369 72 730 624 183 Y74 416 128 133 3x0 154 3096 Added 0 0 0 o a 0 b o D D 0 0 D Ibtal 12a 369 72 330 626 183 174 418 129 173 380 154 3096 Tra!!ix 7.8.0715 Io) 2008 Dowling Ab6oC. Licensed to CITY OF CUP&RTINO N V A (D FSCistLng + ATI ~ Peak Thu occ 11, 2007 14r31r39 Page 4-1 Cupertino TIA Intersection Ca1CU3aclons I~IpaLG Analy818 RepOLL Leval C! SarviCa Iacsrsecti0n sere lvture Cbange Del/ v/ Del/ Y/ in Los veh c Los veb c 8 1 Stevens Creek 4. Tubb Fd C 27.4 0.684 C 27.4 0.654 • 0.000 D/V 4 2 9tevena Creek i Hasy Avo C- 34.4 0.716 C- 74.8 0.711 + 0.000 D/V $ 3 Stevens Creek i 8l 85 ReOpS C- 34.9 0.850 C- 34.9 0.850 + 0.000 D/V 8 4 Stevens Creek 4. NB BS Rartps D+ 37.4 0.786 D+ 37.4 0.796 + 0.000 D/V • 5 8tavens Creek i Scel~ling Rd S+ 56-/ 0.902 S+ 56.4 0.902 + 0.000 D/V R 6 9GQVe0a Creak 4 SAICH 8 14.9 0.944 l 14.9 0.544 ~ 0.000 D/V R 7 Sc4!veae Creek 4 srmdlay C- 33.1 O.efi2 C- 33.1 0.882 + 0-000 D/V 8 B Stalling i Oreenlca! 8 14.7 0.805 B 14.7 0.805 • 0.000 DN tl 9 Stalling i NCClellaa D 45.6 0.818 D 45.6 0.618 + 0.000 D/V Tre!!ix 7.8.0715 (c1 2006 Dowling 3Veoc. Licensed Lo CITY Oi CUPBRTINO 0 u~ r- N ONIiy'ddN d0 1tD:IJ a] paBVaopl 'xeBy lSaTT~ 900E la) sTLO-9-L xT33azs •aat; xad BzaD i0 zaqunu sq] aL pB7sadss anartp =apoTT wf rfrllf•f 1YrfTw-f NfflNrfiN N•.•N•f•Nr•N•N•M Nf •++I•••r1r•wf•w NfriN lTf L LT tT 9 BS ZL L T L t S 4 *O~vxLW~t J J O +J J +Q 6 0: 8 .Q Q 9: tsnOW /.q BdI 9'EZ E'TE p'ef -'TL 6'LL T'SE 9'Oi 4'tf r L9 9'Ei 9'fi Y 99 +VaA/LaG FSR DO-t OD'S 00't 00'T DO'T 00'2 DO'T OD'T 00'2 00'2 00'S 00'2 rL'PYLaC zaaLl B'ft E'tE 0'84 f'IZ 6'LL T'Sf 0'04 i'Ti 4'29 9'ff 9'E- 4'99 =Van/dtLaQ BO'0 99'0 BL'0 Lf'0 HL'0 89'0 E?'D 9T'0 92'0 6T'0 6S'0 f9'a +daJ/adaTOA 5'Ct S'LE L'fL 8'T1 B'Ti f'fE 6'Tt L'TL TLS 0'OS 0'OL L'OT +amSS mazy frrr frTr fNT frrf saaAAN ]tom fD'0 LL-0 6T'0 5S'0 EE'0 EL'D LO'D LO.O 60'0 LD'0 ZO'0 80'0 +7n6/LOA ~BLnpoW sTsAtsaS ~C]SaadaJ I---------------li-----...-------II-------'-------II---------------I--...------- 05LS OOLS OSLS OSLT OOLS OSLT OSLT OO6T 0512 C8f LLEL OSTL r'748 SaaSd 00't 00'E 00'T 00't OD'E 00'S 00't 00'T 00"T LL'0 EL'O DO'L ~BSaa•I 26.0 00'T Lf'0 26'0 00'2 26-0 Z6'0 00'2 26'0 56.0 56'0 C9'0 r3aam]Bn~pw OO6T 0062 0061 0082 0062 0062 0061 0065 0062 DO6L 006E OO6T +aar3/]a6 +atnpoie noT3 a0;]'ax0as3 I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I-------...-- 9i OLZS CEE L9C 599t OOi LL Ti S92 6 SC 99C ~'COA T~Sd 00'T 00'T 00'2 00-T 00'2 00'S 00't 00'T 00'2 00'S 00't 00'T ~~pY d7W DO'T OD'T 00'T 00'T 00'S 00'T 90'S 00'S 00'2 00'S 00't DD'L +LPY H7d 9i OLLS LEE L9C 59 HT 004 Lt Si 98T f SC 992 rtOA pa0aya8 BB 0 0 OL£ O 0 tOT 0 0 Ei 0 0 sToA ]Onpag iET OLZL ZE£ LEA SHOT 006 SET T- S9S L5 SL 992 +aDOitOA dHd 26.0 Zf'0 C6'0 26'0 t5'0 Z6'0 26'0 Lf-D 26.0 26-0 Cf'0 26.0 +Cpa d}Td 00'S 00"T 00't 00'T 00'S 00'T 00'I 00't Oa'S DO'i 00'I 00'T •LpY zaep £ZL B9tT 50£ 925 9iLS 99C iCT BE LST 8f EL S1L r]Rd itT]SuI D a o a a a D o 0 o D o +toA~CHxassaa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rLOA papP[ ELL 89LT 50t 945 9LGS 19E fLi BE L$T 84 EZ 6iL +aBg L92]Sai 00.2 00'T 00'2 00'2 00"t 00'S 00'T Oq'S 00'2 00'T 00'T 00'2 'Cpv Va++OZfJ fLT B9TS 50f S9S 9TLT B9E fLT BE L$S 9f f2 562 LOA asag ia2ApoW amntoA I---------------II-•-------------II---------------Ilr--------------I------------ S 0 E 0 T T 0 E 0 2 T 0 L 0 T 0 L 0 0 L +Ba01M OS OI L 0I OS L OS OT L DL O? L ~tnasp 'aTW apaL~aI apntani apriLOUI apnLavI ~s]g6Tt1 paaoa3osd pa77a]OZd W7osaazd pa]Oa]ozd TLOZ]vac~ I-------------'-II---------------II°-------------II---.....-------I------------ x- s- z ~- a- z s- s- z x- a- a =]uwwnox panOH aa9M PLOY 7Bag prnrOS LI]mS pvnoH V]zog +V0403d0Y • ••r •Ir•••••r Yf NI •Nf f•••TYf•flrf fNrN••NffT N•••YT•I r11f •N ••1 •N •ff+fTN •Tr -~ +ta;nzaS 30 LaAa'I C9 =aLDrS,j LsOtS]QO f'fF +lgaA/oaa) .tttaa a6tzanY (OSe O'ffy+x) CT :lOaB) ewSd ssal 9LC'0 +lX)'dtJ/"LOA LaOT7TzJ OOT r(OaB) aLx.C~ N•NN••w•fN•N •rf rf rrN Nrf••Iffrf Nrrrsrrfr. NINNN• f fNNNN N•NrN ff• antd dxtW 9 >taa~ aaana]8 L9 aOT]OaaxaauI Y •r•N rr•rrf•Y• •r••h1•r•w• 1••f rr•flrwN•ff f•f r+•f NY••Nf frrr•r}•r •NfrrfN N•rr IaAT]at~a]TY a~mtoA azn]r1d) poy]aW sOOT]tzad0 WJF! Daat ]zodag aotat]ni9YDJ aat^xaS 30 tona•i saoS]aLnOL^'J v0;]~atza]aI YIb oaF]zadru T-9 abtd Of TEj1S TOOL 'tt ]DO nt{I, xtea Wd TSY + 6aSSeS>e CatISiIBdDJ d0 xaID 09 ptauaOSR 'OOSSY 6aTtMOO: BOOT (OI 5220'9'2 YSi7aiL 'amL sad Bxva i0 zBWma ay7 s; pa]zodaz snaap +aaOpl NHwf NN••f NffNN NfN•NNUfN•Nf NNN•fr•.fN•N•••Nf •f•T•1•NNfrf•ff oT DT oT t tT T o t t s s s rD$AfntLWaa H +p q .~ Q 0: Q +8 fJ H H =arwW ~ EI~I 9'ST 9'£2 L'LE C'O L, 8'LL 2'C4 L'$i f'Gf 8'55 L'CZ 2'04 2'09 ~q'+A/TaCFPf 00't 00'T 00'I 00'S 00'T 00'2 00'2 00'T 00'T 00't 00'T 00.5 +[pYLaQ zaBn 9'ST 9-ST t'Lf E'OL B'LL S'L1 L'S- Y L1 1'S5 G'L2 2'09 2'09 rgaA/d7TaQ Hf'0 8-'0 T9'0 GO'0 29'0 SL'0 TO'0 LL'0 -4.0 72'0 t9'0 t9'0 +daJ/^~IOA 5'09 5'09 Y SE 4'ii i'ii i'S2 0.OT 0'OI 0'OT 9'Ei T'Ct T"LS taD1;= mup NN ••w• N•. +BaAOW DSxJ HL'0 5t'0 EL•0 CD'O HL'0 SO'0 00'0 TO"0 t0'0 OL'0 Lq'O LO'0 +iaB/LOA ~aLnpat s;scLrart ~t]SOedaJ -Ef 99£E 052E OSLS 009E OSLT OS LT DOLL DSLT 052E •50E S6tT +'3eH t^aTd 6i'p T9'T DO'L 00'T 00'2 00-2 00'T DO'S 00.2 00'2 LT'0 E9'0 +Bam'1 98'0 16'0 f8'D Lfi'D 00-5 LB'0 26'0 DO'S Lf'D ft'0 56'0 SL'0 +]aaDr;snFpY DOLT 6062 DOLT OOBT 0061 0062 Doer DOGS 0061 OD6T OOLt OOBT +earT/]as ~atnpasc +wTd vOT~amaag I---------------II---------------II---------------II-----....------I------------ EB 6f8 f95 LS Ef6 9L [ T[ OL TOE LL LOS 'LOA Laa'i3 00't DO'S 00'T 00'T 00'2 00'S 00'T 00'2 00.7 00't 00'S 00'2 +Gpr d'IIt 00'T DD'S 00'T 00'T 00-5 00'S 00'2 00.2 00'T 00'T OD'T 00'T '+L17C 9Jd f9 6E1 CS5 LS C4L BZ L IL OL t0f LL tOL +IOA paaapa'd 1 0 0 66 0 0 ft 0 0 LTL 0 0 +TOA ]OtlpaB TL iC8 E55 LSI £i6 9L ST SL OL Tt9 TL TOT =wanton dBd CL'D 26'0 26'0 26.0 26'0 26.0 Li'D tf'tl t1•o Z6'D 26'0 t6'0 ~L•PY dEiB DO'S aD'L DO'S 00't 00't 00'2 OD'S 00'S DO'L 00'2 00'2 00'T +Fpt ~^n i8 LLL 60S 8'CS 998 ft 4T 6T i9 LLi BS EL s3Ri E^S];aI 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 ~;oA+SHZasiM 0 0 0 0 a D 0 0 0 0 0 0 'LOA P^PPrr -9 LLL 809 f[S B91 iC fT 6S i9 LLi LS C6 ntq L=T]SnI 00'S 00'T 00'2 00'I 00't 00'T 00'T DO'S 00'T 00'T Oa'T 00'2 +GM q]aOxp -H LLL 605 LET 999 fL fT 6t -8 LLi BT £8 +ToA o9aEt ~aTi~OW adnTOA I_______________II-____...__-----II-______..-_..__II_._______.__.__I______-_._-- 0 T L O L T O L 0 t T 0 S D T L 0 0 T 0 raaarT OS OT L OS DI ! OT OS L OS Ot L ~mazp 'aSW apnLOU2 ^F+S>QI apatOOI TLO '^~t81i1 Da3oa]oxd pa]Da]ozd angd 7FLd0 atigd ]SL08 +?oz]aoJ 1---------------II----'----------II---------------II---------------1------------ v - s - z Y - .L - 7 tt - i - 4 u - s - '[ r]vouanOW panne ]saN pvnOH ]seg pvno8 V7ao8 pmoS V]zgT +yotoxddtl frr?N•Nr•lrrr•r••Ffff•••frrf if r•IN rr•f•f}Iw1.1•N •rr•f •••••r1f!•N N•rr•NrH ~ raOTA.saB 70 T~a'2 SS ~ata~ IaaT~`o i'LL +{V+M~w) AaTaq abtzBAY (OaB O'ifY+1U LS ~(aaYl ^WTL fB07 f59'D +fX)'dtJ/"LOA Lt~S7 TxJ OSS ~{.:aL) aLOl~j frr•••N•NN•N•f•N•N•N•NN NrN•f •••••Nf fN•fNNN N•NN• Nf •NNf•f •N pM gat'te a >,aazJ svanau Se ao;aasszs]aI w•N•N•f•w •f••NNNN•N •f •wrN•••f•rur•f•r Nf NNNINN•NHN•T•••rN r•• (anS7a0za]T~t aYmton asnind) paV]aW aaoT]tzsdp WJW OOOL ]zodaY aOT]a]ndtw7 aa{nza6 SO LBAaz avoS»LnOLsJ aOT ]Oas=77aI 1f[& Ov;axadn0 t~S a6wd 6[ Tf ~fT 2002 'tT ia0 nV7 gead rid LSK + 4uS ]62x6 Skirting + ATI PM Peak The Oct 11, 2007 14s3k,40 Page 7-1 cvpertino TIA Intersection Calculatia¢ra Laval 0i Service Cou~ueatim Report 2000 ACM Operacion8 Method (FUtnt'a Volume Altexlutiva( a ref •a a•«aaarararfa{•r•aafwa•aaaar•••rar•aaa•aa•.•aaa raaar raaaa•arraa InterasctlcnrR3 9tevons Creak i SB 85 Ramps ai•Lt•aafAef{ria•wa•wffaaaaaw+fwa•taAaf aasAr{wa{w4awf wales•wwaaf•H{a•af a••{aw#a CyeL (see)r 110 Cri tieai Vol./Cap.(X)r O.a50 Lose Time (aec-, 12 (Y+A.4.0 aec- Average Dalry (sae/veh)r 34.9 Optimal Cycia, 94 Level Of Beryl Ca r. C- aaaa• •ra•raa ra aaaraafalalaaaf{a rarrfwr{rra Hwawaaaaawa•aweaaarffa•1r H•w•••f Approach. North Sou¢d SouCh Bound £a9t Bound West Bound MWeOlanCr L- T- R- L T- R L- T- A L- T - R .--------_--I---------------II.---------..---II--....--_------II-_----......---I Canttnlr Daxmittad Proucced PsraiCted Protected R1ghCar Include Include Include Include Win. Grea6r 7 10 SO 7 10 10 7 30 30 T 10 SO Lnnss, 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 --------___-i---------------II-------------•-II---------------II---------------I V01vme Module= ease Valr 0 0 0 1205 6 751 D 103b 173 444 739 O Osovth Adjr i.DD l.aD l.o0 1.oD 1.0o S.oD i.o6 1_ao 1.oD 1.06 i.oo l.oo Initial ffi6er 0 0 0 1205 d T51 0 1038 173 444 739 0 Added Vols D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Passareyvolr D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 Initial 311tr D 0 0 1209 6 751 D 1036 177 944 719 0 veer Adjr i.oo i.6o l.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 l.DD l.DD l.oo l.oo 1.60 PAP Adjr 0.92 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Pffi~' Volvos: 0 0 0 1310 7 91b '0 1126 188 483 803 D RaduCt Vols 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 0 152 0 D 0 Reduced Volr 0 0 0 1310 7 786 0 1128 ]8 483 903 0 PCS Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1_OD 1.00 Mt3' Adjr 1.00 l.DD l.oD 7.. DD l.DD L.oD l.DO 1.oD i.oo 1.00 1.oD l.oD Final Val.s 0 0 0 1370 T 7A6 0 7126 36 4B3 003 0 Sstuntion Plox radule: ' Sat/i.sner 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 AdjUatts¢tr 0.92 1.60 0.91 0.97 0.95 0.92 0.91 0.99 0-95 0.93 1.00 0.92 Laiuet 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.99 0.01 l.OD 0.00 3.87 0.13 2.00 2.00 0.00 Fiaal 8at.i D 0 0 4916 25 1750 0 7167 233 3190 3800 0 Capa6lty AnalYaiB LWdule: ' Vol/8atr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.27 D.4f 0.00 0.18 0.15 0.15 0.21 0.00 Crit Moveal rrra r•ar saa• Gress Timer 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.1 58.1 58.1 0.0 20.0 20.0 19.8 39.9 0.0 volume/Caps 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.SO O.SO 0.85 0.00 O.BS 0.85 0.95 0.58 O.OD Delay/Vlllr 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.4 17.4 11.9 0.0 50.3 50.3 f8.4 30.7 O.D Vier 3)e3Adje 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD sAjDel/Vehs 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.4 17.4 31.9 0.0 30.3 50.3 58.4 30.2 0.0 IRS by BbVar A A A B 8 C ~~ A D D B+ C A AC143kArgOs 0 0 0 16 1 27 0 12 17 12 11 0 fa saa••aa•Aaaaa lAafa a•afaaaa•••wfwaa•aa•af •w••f awr•rrraaf{a#aa wfaaawl•1ra Notara9uaua reported is the number of cars per lam. Traiiix 7.8.0738 (c) 1006 Ikmling Aasac. Liaenaad ka C7TY 69' NPRlTINO 6%iating + ATS PM Peak Thu oat 11, 2007 14,71,40 Pags 8-1 Cupertlnv SIA InCeraeetioa Calculations Leval Of Sasviee Computation Aepora: loon ACM Operations Mathad (Future volume Alccrnativa) +fafaw••+••fa.•f•••awrff#waeaeraaaaw•La•ra•••r•saaaaaeaaaa•raaf rawawaaaw•f•aa:rr IriLEY9ECt1017 4!9 6CevanB Crean 4 NB 83 Ramp6 aa•aawf{af}www•!ha•wara••ararf sect.aa•Vaaraara••a}fa•afha•••rr}•al4wrw#•Nfaaaha Cycle (sec3+ I10 Cri tieal Vol./Cap. (X1: 0.796 LOa6 Time (BeC1, 12 (Y+R.a.O DeC) Average Delay (sec/vehis 37.4 Optimal Cycler 78 Level OF Service: D+ aawa•+aLr•ral wwrawl wawfa{af awwwaara•aaaaAaf••a•If •a Oaff•4earlfaflwa asset of AA hf ww Approach: March Bound SoOth evund L:s9t Bound Waac Sauna MCVemanLt L- T- R L- T - R L- T- A L- T- R ..-.....----I ---------------t l---...--------- I I--_---..---_--- I I---------_..... I Controlr Pplit Phase Split Fbase Protected Protected Rights: inciuda Include mcludc Ignore Mi¢. Greenr 7 10 10 7 10 l0 T 10 10 7 10 ]0 La¢e8e 0 1 1 O 0, 0 0 11 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 ------------ L--------------Il---------------II------------.--II---------------I Vclvae Modules Base Vol: 54 283 0 256 1 530 431 1909 0 0 934 899 Growth Adjs 1.00 l.o0 1.00 i.ao l.oD 1.00 1.00 1-60 l.oo S.oa l.oD 1.oD Iaitinl Baer 84 293 0 259 1 530 491 1909 0 0 93! !4! Added VoI: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o D 0 0 PaaBerByVOIr D 0 D 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Futr 54 283 0 288 1 530 491 1904 0 0 931 949 veer Adjr 1.00 l.Da 1.DO 1.0o I.oo l.oo I,oo l.oD l.oo l.oD 1.06 D.oo YAP Adjr 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.42,0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.00 PHF VO1LRIa, 5! 308 D 280 1 576 534 ZD75 0 0 1015 0 Aeduc[ Volr 0 0 D 0 0 279 O 0 O 0 0 0 Reduced VOlr 39 308 0 260 1 297 534 ZD75 0 D 1019 0 PCR Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLP Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 •1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 0.00 F1na1 Wl.r 39 308 0 280 i 797 834 2075 D 0 1015 0 ------------1---------------II---------------II---..-,....,_.---II---^-----------I 9atvratio6 Plow !(odules Bat/I.ansa x900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190a 1900 1900 Adjustmmltr 0.45 0.98 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.93 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.12 Lancer 0.33 1.67 0.00 6.6$ 0.01 2.34 1.00 3.00 0-00 0.00 9.00 1.00 !i¢al Bac., 533 3107 0 1141 4 2354 3350 5700 0 O 9700 1750 _-_--_-.----I-------------~-Il---------------II------.-.------ll---_------.----I Cepacicy Amlyeis Module: Vol/Batr 0.10 0.10 O.DO 0.23 0.19 'O.i3 0.17 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 Cr1t Mavn. •+af r.a. w{A+ arll Green T1lle: 13.7 13.7 0.6 34.0 34.0 34.0 24.5 50.3 0.0 0.0 2s.a 6.D V03ues/Capr O.BO 0.80 0.00 0.80 O.EO 0.41 0.76 0.80 O.DO 0.00 0.76 0.00 Delay/Veh: BD.i 60-1 0.0 43.6 43.8 30.9 47.5 28.1 0.0 0.0 43.3 6.0 Veer DelAdjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj2181/Vehr 60:1 60.1 0.0 13.6 43.6 30.8 47.5 28.1 0.0 0.0 13.3 0.0 LOB by Haver 6 S A D D C D C A A D A IA142kAVgQr 8 8 0 34 38 6 11 31 0 0 12 0 aralra•raaa•aaaww•wra Nar•fafN•flafNf Maaaaafaa+a Lrasaaaw••aafaaw•rwww{twa •f •a Notes Oueve reported is the number of cars per lane- Traiil% 7.8.0735 (c( 1006 DotA ing Ateoc, Lieemed to C1"IY OF CUP63tT IMO N V (7r N u7 N ORISY3dlLa d0 J412J Oa p9eaa0pt 'OOnaY BnTT~¢ 900L (a) STLO'6'L ><S?iru. '9wT xrd urD i0 ssgmta rqa rT p.asodrs raaDO srapp «r Y«««. r N+r«. • •.• •. r • •««r«• N «Y •• «r •. «•. • «• «•. «r«. • «• r. r N •w •• 0 fT 0 0 L LS T 0 S 0 0~ 0 %06AY~G:Fg01 H +J Y Y , Y -J ¢ Y H Y, Y Y +anoW !.q SC7 i-9I 6'Zt 0'0 0'0 f'C B'Lf d'Li 0'0 9'09 0-0 0'0 0'0 ~tlaA/Saa(•pY ' 00'T p0'S 00'T 00'T DO'T 00'S DO'i 00'S 00'S OD'[ 00't DO't +FpYLa¢ xaoll 5'SL 6'LL 0'0 0'0 f'E 9'LE 8'L9 0'0 9'p9 0'0 0"0 0'0 aR9n/aLrSP¢ ' EO'0 b5'0 00'0 OD'0 c5.0 6S"0 ~OL'0 00'0 b5'0 OD•0 00'0 DO•D 'd+aJ/mmtoA p•OS 9'DS 0.0 0'0 d'69 Z'6E Z'tt 0'0 [•ii 0'0 0'0 0'0 ~amtd aaasA LO'0 LL'D 00.0 00'0 .4f'0 tL'0 GO'0 00'0 90'0 00'0 00'0 00'0 +ar6/TDA 'aLnDOtI 9T9.ttraY daFDrdq f---------------II-----_--_------II-...-----------II------.--__----1--_--------- 09LT DOLS 0 0 DOLS 08Lt DSLS 006T OSLT 0 0 0 ''ars LAW OD'S OD'E 00'0 00'0 00'E 00'T DD'I 00'S 00'S OD'0 00'0 OD'0 ~8anr't L6'0 00.5 L6'D L6-D OD'i L6'0 L6'0 00'T Lf'D Z6'0 00'L L6'0 +711aN7CM1I+j7Y DOBI 006T 006I OO6L 0065 OOdt D06S 006t 0065 0065 006t 006t ~aarl/arB aat~ wOTd ao[arxrars I---------------II----.....------ll---------------11---------------I---------_.- Lt DTST 0 0 9ste 99E S[ 0 tDT 0 0 D +-SOn TroFd 00'S 00't 00'T 00't 00'S OD'S 00'S 00'[ 00'T OD'i 00'T 00'T 'GpY .d'Sw 00'T 00'T 00'S 00't 00'S 00'S 00't 00'[ 00'T 00't 00'S 00't +C-Y 9.1d 8Z 9f52 0 0 99TL 99E• SE 0 -Dt 0 0 0 'Loll pa~Prlf 0- 0 0 0 0 0 19S D 0 0 0 0 +TWl3onpa)( 58 9f9t 0 0 99TL 99f EDL 0 50S 0 0 0 'Wa1T0A dNd L6'0 t6'0 Z6'0 Cb'0 t8'0 L8'0 L6'0 L6'0 L8'0 L6'0 LB'0 L9'D ~fPY d7id 00't 00'i 00'S 00'S 00'i OD'T 00'i 00'S 00'[ 00'S 00'L 00'S 'FT~'Y soap 09 STSS 0 0 E66T LEE L9S 0 96 0 0 0 %and taTaTL+I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'Ton~Lfsaas9g D D 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 ' ioA T+aPPY Dp STSS 0 0 £ift LEE Ldt 0 96 0 0 0 +aag SPSa4aI ' ~ 00'L 00't 00't 00'S 00'T 00't 00't 00'S 00'S 00'L DO'T 00'S +Fpf[ gaNRSD 08 StSL 0 0 F69T LEE Lflt 0 96 0 0 0 'Loll a9rH satnpgy MlWTOA i---------------II---------------I1---------------II---..----------I------------ i o E D D D D E 0 T T D S D T '0 0 0 0 0 'aaarl OT OT L OT OS L OT OS L OT Ot L 'u»aA 'aFil fpSitaal OprtTOai 9pntOl[t aprtioat 'a aR6Stt WaaT~ad Paaaa7osd paaasa0s6 PP77TDtzad •Lo Tl~'J 1_______________II_____--___-----II.-.-----_-_____11_______---..-_.I_.-----._-__ H - i R Y - Z - R 8- S - 2 Y - S- 7 i 7uawanai) punog ae9pl Dn+ro9 aass punoH q~noe panoH gasow 'yorOSddY ••rT«Y•Y.r•r!r•4.•+«4•..«« «!•M.•r+•rw a....Y!«.«r«.r...r•. ««!.•.•••N e :OpTnxaB i0 ian07 LE ~ai>.C7 SrwTado 6'iT +(qan/oaa) data¢ a6rsanY lorr 0'S~S+EI 6 +I~rr) uSS 9n0'L 55S•4 'lX)'dtJ/'LOA SaDF]?~ OTS '(oaa) a[aJ~j Tr«T«.•Y!.••T...•+. • «««.. YHr.4r r H.««•«T ««a...«.a•••... •.•.a. r 4.•. r. HJIYS 7 ~(aasJ 9aanaa6 90 aOTaoaasaaal .lr.«!.«rrs• «««.. ••sY.«. «sr.•• ««-• r•.«•.« ra4 r ««««.. • ««r«4««r (anSaaasaaTY aamtoA amand7 pOgaaw 9aoTaasaF-0 wJx OOOZ asodaY uoTaflandm0.~ aOTASaS 30 TanaR aaDTartnatrJ nOT~oaasaaal YIS aaT~sadn~ t-OT a6rd Oi+LE'iT LOOL 'TT asp nqy )(eed qd ISY + 6[[S 16T7{g CWIZa~dQJ d0 i.I23 oa ParaaoM '~B1t CwTT+~¢ 8000 10) 9TL0'B'L xT?Irx2 -wtrT xad sno i0 x9o~Bnu sila aT paa:odes snanp i aaox Y4••w4l.r..«a•+4 r4«aa«prr..T r4•..«.•««««• r««.«• •Tr rr4r • 4•..«««TT E f[ iT 9S 8L E[ Z fT 9S S SS LS '06AYKOOH q 4H -a -a 8 ¢ . H 3 Ts H H '.Pnq( dR SLR Z'LE 0'51 0'dS E'S5 f'S5 S'S9 6'C- i'99 f'T9 L'95 5'OL T'tL *gWi/Ta¢G[W 00't OD'T OD'T 00'T 00'T 00't 00'T 00'S 00'T 00'T 00't 00'S +FCN[9¢ satll L'LE 0^i5 0'98 E'S8 E'SS S'S9 6-E5 Y99 E"L9 L'IS Y DL S'TL 'grA/~Tr¢ tt'0 CS'0 06'0 06'D 06.0 Lf'o OL'0 09'D Ld•0 OS'0 LB'0 06'0 +d90/OUmTOA 9'Sf D'Sf T'TC L'BC L'dL C'St 1'OL 9'OZ 9'if 8'ST S'St 5'LL +~TS ttiY.1;7 80'0 iL'0 EL'0 CC'0 ZC'D LT'0 EO'O 9L'0 5L'0 90'0 TT-0 SC'0 '7rB/TWl +9Tnp4l 0F9.LLraY Aato9dr~ i---------------II---------------II------'--------II----------°---I------------ OSLI 00lS OSTY 956 E44i DSLT OSLT 000E OSLT 051T 001[ 0515 +'7rd T~Fd DO'S 00'C OD'L f8'0 L>'''L OD•t 00'S oo'C 00't 00'T 00'L OD•i caaapi L6'0 00'T Ef'0 56'0 66.0 Z9'0 CQ'D 00'S L6 .0 t6'0 00'i L6'0 'aarYa9T1~pY 906T ODfT 0065 0065 006T 006[ DOfT 0065 OOQS OOft OOBT 006T 'aw~i/a.: ---aPlpDw rwjd OOTOdxllat6 1----•----------II-'-------------II---------------II--- --------t------------ Sd E6 Et LEL -OL EOOI t6C D9 S85 9t5 EST 0[5 09£ +'LOA T'aT3 00't 00'T OD'i 00'T 00'T DO'S 00'S 00'T p0't OD'[ 00'S 00't ~GpY d'1il q 0'S 00'T 00'T 00'S 00'S 00'T DO'S 00't 00'S 00'T 00'S 00'S %[Tn ~d 56 E6fT LEL 50L FOOT T6L 09 865 9S5 ETI OE5 09E 'SOA SrOODPk fiLT 0 0 Ct 0 9 LEL 0 0 Lff 0 0 'IoA 7an9rY 5Lt E6 ES LLL LEC COOT S9L L6Z 565 92i 085 Ot5 09[ ~Nr1ToA dlid L6'0 L6'0 C6'O L6'0 Z6'0 Ld'0 L6'0 Z6'0 L6'0 L6'0 Z6'0 Z6'D +~pY dH8 00'T 00't 00'T 00't 00't 00.5 00'T 00't OD't 00'i 00•[ DO'S +LP1! srra L5L t9ti BL9 9IL E[6 99t ELL 15S EOE iiY 46E iff +allE LtT7Tat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 =tOMtdza99rS 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 'TOA 1+apTrS LSL Z82T dL9 dTL EL6 B9L ELL Li9 C9E its 96C IEE +~H TrSaTal 00't 00't 00'S 00'S 00't 00'T 00'T 00'i 00't 00'S 00'T 00'T 'FpY 4a~+o=fl L5L LBLS IL4 BLL EL6 B9Z ELL Lib E8E iL5 96E SEE 't0A acres +atnpOw aDiA'[OA T 0 C 0 L 0 S L 0 T L 0 L D T L 0 L O T *89at~] OT OT L OL OS L OT OT L OT OS L %noaxD '0TH OpDTOat apntaat 9pnt0ut apnt0ut *9ag6SY pa70aawd ~------------- -aaJaaDxd paaasaozf praoaa0sd +T'~au0.~ --Il-----------....~I---------------11._.._-.----..--I-___._-.-..- Y - S R U - t - 'I Y - S - 4 PI - S - 2 * ]aananow ptsu9 1lPa punoH aACa panoH ganOd panne gasps aq~rosddY T«• T•! T •.. T.l1 •«! «1!••Y 41l4.««I «N.!•..!•• N! •«r •1T4 NTT4 s•441-r.•..lT••• +8 +i:fFAxa6 i0 TanY2 iLT 'aIO-C7 L>~T7dO 5'95 +(Nr6/Oas) +LOtfO a6taafY qa9 O'wxT1U CT Moan) auSy 8rg7 206'0 +(YI'dEJ/-Son TtoF7[xJ OZi '(oar) aTa.~i .•!.s•TTT«•«T4r.r•YT•IT..rlf•«.r.•.•i•••«•«N•iTY••T•r•..T••• 44r-.Y«•l...! pZ SaTttaaB a xaaxJ suanOaS pY aOTa~a9xaaai 4Y••NMarM a1•f•r•«4•rl.4.i•Y.l.T.4••4•l...rlf•T«.T•.4.1.•N«!r!!..••a....•••• (aeSa a•+aaTY awnLeA oxnanal PO1(7aw saotarxad0 5DA DOOL axudax uoSaran~ roTnre9 i0 Ta+u'I t~Ta*inOTrJ lsoS7Oaar+auI YIS OuFaxadnJ. t-6 a6td ~ 0-'TE'it LDOE 'LS ao0 n ead Yid LdY baTaaTx3 r...-~---- ~~ - --- Existing + ATI PM Paak 17rt1 Oet 11, 2007 14.31140 Page 11-1 Sxisting . AT3 PM Peak 71tu tk:C 11, 2007 Sla31a40 Page i]-1 Cupertino TIA tntersectl~ Calculations ~ Cupertino riA I¢CSrieecion Calculations . [rava2 Of 5ervica Coaputatim Report Level OL Serrics CbOQutati0n Report 2000 RCM Operations Mechad (Future Volume Alternative) frNrra•rrrf Hf•ara•4a•a•arr NrN rla ar rr l r aar•r•arfra 1000 RCN Operations tceebod (FUt},re vCluna Alcematlve) aa•llf serer..f rrltl•4rarrlrr}ar••}rrrrt rraa••ar•a•a•••aa•r•aaarrtrlaa af la•aa•••t ••raf afr•IHr••aaw IIStetBeCtlOn (F7 St •rlar•• r evens Greek r 4 Braadley l s a•ar}aa • 1 IDL4YeeCCSCn 9.5 9te111ng 6 Greenleac •arra•r1••1•a}ra•H!a•f••••larrwrr•Haarala••a r•a•rrwarar••fa r!• Yr raa r••1aNa••• N•!~r••rf•Nra••• Cycle (see)r raa•rf•arl rr ~ 310 rarrrl a•r•r••1}ralaarayt•••rf•aa Critical vol./Cap.(XI• } ra a } f O.B61 Cycle l9ec)r BO Crlclcal Vol./Cap.(Xlr O.B05 uosa Time (see)r 17 IY+R-4.0 asc) Averepe Delsy Imc/veh)r 33.1 iv3s Time (secle 12 (Y+R~a.O sec) Average Delay (asc/vahlr 11.7 timal Cycler O 98 [,evel Ot 9ervlCes C- Optimal Cycler 72 Level O! Services e p .•re aH•a•sr•ra•r•a•rr•r•rrf .arse •a•• N•fw rN rarr•r•a MHrrrlrru MrrN H••raua•• •••ra•N HaH HH a•N •aa•ap •••11 ra • aa•t K•arN•H• N •MaH •••wr•••• Approach, Nor •rr•seas th 5a,md a 9outb 90Vlld Past Pr]u¢d we 9L Bct¢rd Approach: Norcb ee,md South He,atd Last Bound we st Sound ' }(gVamentr L- T- R L- T - R L- T- R L- T - R MOYelOe¢tr L- T- R L T R L T P. I I L T R ---------- I ------------ I---------------! I Co¢trolr Permitted --------------- i l------------- - I I Peroitted Protected --------------- I Protected ------------1----------•---- I CO¢trol, Permitted I--------------- f l Permitted --------------- PermiLEtM ----- Dexmicted Rights. Include LiKlnde Include i¢elt#e Rightae Lncluda Iltcltl3e Include Include Green: 7 Min 10 10 7 10 SD 7 10 10 7 io l0 Min. Green, 7 l0 10 7 10 i0 7 SO 10 7 t0 10 . 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 D 1 1 0 ] 1 0 Lanese D D 11 0 0, 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1! ,0 0 Lanes, Volrmie nodular 16 40 199 16 111 443 1530 53 303 1907 107 Volvax Module, Baee vole 16 857 11 21 969 35 55 11 25 74 21 as Haee Vol, 70 Grotn:h Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1•.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ororth M3: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Heat 70 16 40 399 le 111 443 1580 32 103 15Q7 107 Initial Bast 18 657 17 21 969 35 SS 11 13 24 22 21 Added vel, 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 .0 D D 0 Idded Vol r~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 D PaBSlYByV01, 0 0 0 .D 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 0 PaeaerByVOit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 Ilticial PY1tr 70 18 40 1a9 16 lI2 443 1310 9] 105 1507 107 Initial P11t, i6 657 11 21 988 33 SS 11 25 2f al 14 , Da^r Adj. i.Da l.oD i.DD l.DD 2.00 l.oo S.oo l.DD 1.DD l.no 1.DO 1.OD user Adj, 1.0o i.oo I.oa i-oo 1.0o I.oo 1.DO i.DD 2.oD 1.00 l.oo i-oo PRF 3djr 0.92 0.97 0.94 0.92 0.92 0-92 0.92 p_91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.92 P1ffi Adjr 0,91 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.42 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.93 P107 Volwa, 7f 17 43 314 17 17] 482 1717 5a 114 1638 216 Ph7 Volume, iT 714 13 73 1057 35 60 12 ]T 78 23 76 P.educt Volr 0 0 25 0 D 83 0 0 7 0 0 14 Aaduct Volt 0 D i 0 0 2 0 0 12 0 0 70 Reduced VOl+ 78 17 19 314 17 41 492 1717 51 ila 1838 97 Baduced Volr 17 714 17 73 1051 38 60 12. 15 18 13 6 PC8 Adj. 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 2-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PC6 Aejs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLE Adjr 1,00 i.DO 1.00 l.DD i.oD l.oa l.oo l.oD l,DO l.aD i.oD 1. DO MLF Adjr l.oD 1.oD l.oo S.oo a.DO i.oo 1.aD 1.00 1.DD 1.00 l.DO t,oD Fiml VOl.r 76 17 39 311 37 43 497 1717 51 134 16]8 91 Final Vol.r 27 714 I1 73 1051 3i 60 17 15 26 13 6 Saturation Flay Module, 9aLt[racion Flow Module: 5'at/Lane. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 5900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Sat/Laser 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2900 Ad3u5LtnenL, 0.95 0.95 0.91 0-99 0.95 0.9a 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.92 0.98 0.99 Ad]nstmasttt• 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.97 0.41 0.91 0.97 Gs¢aet 0.81 0.19 1.00 0.95 0.05 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 7.83 0.17 Leneer 0.07 0.86 0.02 0.07 0.98 0.03 0.69 0.14 0.17 0.4T 0.41 0.11 Final Sat.. 1483 333 1750 17 D6 94 1750 I750 5700 1750 1750 5301 29! Pixtal Sat., 41 1661 28 38 1857 57 3204 241 I06 830 716 194 II C it Anai sle 11 Modular -----_---. tl- II ~ ----- .-... I I I Capacity Aaalyala Mcdula, I---. I I--- fl ----- ---------- apac y y VOI/iatr 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.01 0.15 0.30 0.03 O.DT 0.31 0.]3 ~nol/Eat, 0.4] 0.47 0.49 0.63 0-63 0.8a 0.OS 0.05 0.05 0.03 D. 03 0.03 CYit }bvtlr Olreen Time, 13.5 13.5 13.5 aa•a •rae 13.5 a1.5 13.3 33.1 61.3 81.3 33.3 seas 39.4 39.4 Crit Moves, Green Timer 58.0 59.0 58.0 •a•r 55.0 58.0 59.0 arra 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Io.o 10.0 Volume/Cap, 0.24 0.14 0.03 0.86 0.86 0.11 0.98 0.54 O.OS 0.54 0.86 0.98 Volume/Cap, 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.96 D.ae D~ia 0.40 0.40 0.40 O.ZS 0.19 0.25 Delay/Vahr 37.4 37.4 3a.6 83.4 63.4 35,4 51.1 16.1 11.2 55.1 38.0 38.0 De1ay/veh, 7.2 7.2 7.7 16.9 16.9 16.9 77.5 17.5 3?.S 34.4 34.4 34.4. oast DelAdje 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 .1.00 1.OD 3.00 1.00 Veer DelAdjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,OD 1.00 MjDel/veht 37.4 37.4 34.8 63.4 63.4 35.4 51.2 16.1 11.7 55.1 38.0 39.0 AdjDel/Vehr 7.2 7.7 7.2 18.9 18.9 26.9 ' 37.5 37,5 37.5 ' 34,4 34.4 34.4 LA5 byl Move. D+ W C- E 8 D+ D- 1 ^+ B+ D+ I08 by MOVer A A A B 9 8 D+ D+ D+ C- C- ACf4lkAVgpr 3 3 1 14 14 1 19 11 1 a 5 Mr 11 21 IHNH••N IiCM71Q1vgQe 10 20 10 aH •rN rlNrrar Nr•aarH•a Nr 26 26 28 3 3 3 2 1 7 rtHau raara.•rae•rr+rN rafatAtlrr HrrlrlHNrMap . arr•H Marrlaa•••a•ara•••••a••r•H MrNru•a•a}araH»arv era a• Nora, QWUe rlpOrtold 1^ t}re ¢i¢Rber Ol CarB per lane. •r Note: OueOe nporLed 16 the ntlmhli' 0£ Gel per Sanl. ; TralfiX 7.5,0715 (c) 1006 Dowling Aeaoc. Licensed to CITY Od CSTPB9TIN0 Tra!!iX 7.8.0715 (c) 1006 DoMl i¢g AsSOC- LiCe¢sad CO QTY OE CUPS.RTINO N V Cir W Existing ± AT3 pM Pack Thu Oct 11, 1007 14s31+40 pigs 13-i Rtparci7a i2A Iataructlon calculatiaaa Laval OL Service Cottptttation Report 3000 HG1 Oparationa MnC1fOd IfUCUra Volume Alcerrutive) a+fwf•alHf!lsaH•HH HHHrr!!!! rr«Hr e H arla• •!•!uulf laH fr!• r!r f+eH••»• InceraaCtisxf 99 Stall Stg a l9;Clellaa H!f!•!1H!lrfrr •rr!!r f H r••ff rH ffaar•!f ff flarHrH ll!!1!•!!lrHalf!!!!!lrrrrr! cycle laao)s loo critical vol./Cap.(E1• - 0.818 Loss Time fsac)+ 12 (Y+A.4.0 asc) Average Daley (asx/veh?r 45.6 Opcimll Cycis: 91 Ueval 0! Services D N•rrrif•+!•H!f!!flrr•rrrrHlrrflrrrararflf!•!!a•1•i•lfrr•!f if fafar!•rfl Hflf r! Approache Nareh Botmd 9eoth Brnmd Ease Hound roost Brnmd govaatlrlt= L- T- R L - T - R L - T - R L-. i - R ----...-----~---------------i i---------------i r---------------i ~---------------i mntzols YroteCCad prole,-tad Protected Pntected Rigbta+ IDCluda include IOC14da Include Min. Omen: 7 10 10 7 10 SO 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lama: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 VO11Aie IlOdula+ Haag Volr 128 389 73 330 62a 163 174 43A 11! 133 380 154 Orowth 740+ 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 I.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Haas 128 389 72 330 626 183 174 418 L28 133 360 154 Mded Vol: a D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 paasarByvole o 0 o D o 0 0 0 0 o a o Lnitlal luC. 128 369 72 330 626 183 174 418 12! 133 380 184 Oaer Adjs 3.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 S.DO 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 IOQ+J1dje 0.97 0.97 0.82 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0_99 0-97 0.92 0.92 0.92 PFff VolOeMS lag 401 71 3S9 680 19p 399 454 140 143 411 167 Radnct Vol. 0 0 50 O 0 ]0 0 0 36 0 0 132 Reduced Vo1s 179 601 78 7S! 860 16! 169 494 134 145 433 35 PC72 Adi+ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 1_00 t~+F Adj+ 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.OD 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final VO1_s 139 401 28 359 860 169 169 454 114 145 413 3S 5at+aa[ion Piow lfOdOlas bat/Laaas 1900 1800 1100 1100 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 AdjuatiwOts 0.92 0.9t 0.l6 0.91 0.la 0.95 0.92 0-95 0.98 0.92 1.00 0.83 Iaaear 1.00 1.86 0.17 1.00 I.55 0.45 1.00 0.80 D-30 1.00 1.00 1.00 Piwl Bat.r 1750 3456 1!4 1750 7x93 604 175D 1436 ;i2 1750 3900 1750 CapaClcY Analysis Fbdulas Vol/Bats 0.06 0.13 0.17 0.20 0.34 0.24 0.11 0.33 0.22 0.06 D.22 D.02 CYit 160'Vasr aH• felt H•~i !•ar Cresn 71me+ 9.9 L4.1 14.7 75.1 29.3 78.3 18.2 38.8 38.6 10.3 32.6 37.8 Wlcans/Cap: 0.80 0.82 o.al o.a1 o.ea 0.80 0.87 o.as 0.82 0.82 0.87 0-Da Dalay/Vahs 75.1 54-9 54.9 50.6 30.9 36.9 91.3 37.6 37.6 76.7 34.T 73.4 176ar DelAd7+ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 AdjDel/Veb+ 79.1 54.9' 54.9 50.6 36.9 36.9 51.3 37.8 37.8 '78.7 34.7 13.4 L08 lry l~Var S- D- D- D Or Da D- D+ D+ A- HpA2kAVgQs 7 9 9 14 15 19 7 19 19 7 12 1 !!lH1fHHr•f 1rN!•Hr1••lfaM HaHlHfHf!!Nr!•lrf rr•!r9!!lifr•!arlffa!!a ••r• Pota+ Quaua reported is Lhe oW1~ar of care par law. TratLix 7.e.D7v le) zoos Dowiiag Aeaoa. Llcenaed Co err OP euPHRrDw N V CT A N V Cn CT Existing + ATI + Project AMTht1 OCC il, 7007 14:20:26 Page 1-1 Cupsrcin0 T7A intersection Calculations scenario Repose SCenarl0, Existing + ATI • Project AM Paa3C CoDmatfd= Exiaiing + ATI + Pzoj eCi AH - voTueea, Existing + ATY + Proj net AM Peak lfOttt GEOmetry: SxlotiriQ + ATI + Prof AH IRipdCL Pea, DeEdUlC ID~QdCC Fee Trip Generation: Project AM , Trip DletzibtitiOn= Deily PaLbas Default PaCM itouces= oelault Reutee CanHguration. Datault Configuration Trattix 7.8.0715 (c) 2006 Dwling Assoc. Licensed to GIST OF CUP6RTIN0 Existing a ATI + Project AMThu Oct li, 7007 14=20,3s Page 2-1 Cupertino TIA Intareaetion Calculations Trip Generation Report Foraeast !ez Dtvjact AM Zane Raee Rate xrips Trips Total ! O! 4 Svbaona Aanunt lmie^ in Oue In O.st Tripe Total 1 1.00 Project 111.00 54.00 114 54 i69 10D.0 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 O 0 0.0 Zang 1 subtotal ..........:.................. 114 St i6B T0D.0 TOTAL .....................: .......................... .. 114 b4 1e6 10D.0 Traltix 7.9.6715 (c1 2006 Dowling Asses. Licensed to CITY OF CVPSRTAtO CXisying a ATI • DrOj ect AHThu Oct 11, ]007 14:20.76 Cupertino TIA Tatereectioa Csieulaciona Trip DiStributiOn AlDOry Dercwt 0! Tripe Daiiy TO QateB 1 2 3 4 8 6 lane ----- ----- -°-- ----• °--- ----- 1 40.0 30.0 S.0 7.0 3.6 iS.O gaga 3-1 ExisCinq a ATI • Proj ece AMThu OCy 11, 1007 14<20s18 Page 4-1 CuDeryin0 TiA InCerseCtien Calculations itu7iing MoveB~eac Reyort Projeec AM VOSOMa Northbound 9ouyhbaund Eaecboimd Nostbound Total Type Twit Ibrn A1ght Leit Tksru P1ght Laic Thtu FSghc Lett lhru Right Volume AS Syevena Creek a Bubb Rd Baa• 144 1i SOS 93 17 50 14 '7'79 B7 5D7 864 25 3116 Added 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 9 Tbyal 144 11 SOS 93 17 50 14 76S B7 507 Ba7 3S 3125 #2 BteVans Crask B Mari Ave • Hass 37 6 29 70 11 172 214 1016 640 217 845 67 3324 Added 0 0 0 14 0 20 86 0 0 0 14 14 148 Total 37 $ Z9 B4 11 191 360 1016 640 217 qS9 81 2472 #} stavaas Ctuk 8 eB B5 Rams Base 0 0 0 1087 0 101 0 1174 180 206 692 O 1420 Added 0 0 0 /$ 0 0 0 6 0 16 ] 0 71 TOCal 0 D 0 1312 0 101 0 1180 180 2Z1 895 D 3491 #4 Scevers Crick B NB B5 Ranps • Haas 40 101 0 218 S 4BS E81 1574 0 0 622 533 4269 Added 0 0 34 0 0 0 D 51 ~0 0 39 12 1Z6 Tbcal 40 101 34 ]]8 9 4!5 6:1 1625 0 0 641 SSB 4395 q5 8yevena Creek i Stelling Rd Bes• 393 557 246 21] 354 231 252 977 1!3 571 822 141 4454 Added 3 0 0 0 0 q 4 8 2 0 17 0 42 Total 396 SS7 ISB 2i3 354 239 256 165 1DS $71 639 143 4496 #$ stavene Creek i 8AIC73 Ha9e 0 0 0 ]4 0 103 259 1]1a 0 0 977 60 2557 Added 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 8 0 0 17 0 Z9 Total 0 0 0 34 0 103 269 1132 0 0 !94 60 2582 C7 9eavetsa Creak 4 Srendley Haa• 14 74 Z 3E 9 14 150 754 20 38 1137 l0a 23D6 Added 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 8 0 0 17 0 Z5 Totai 14 24 2 36 9 2! ISO 762 20 28 1154 101 2331 #8 6tellinq i Oreealeai Sava 14 672 24 9 6aS 50 109 2D 33 34 15 32 1616 Added 0 4 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1] TOCaI 14 $76 24 9 61.] 50 109 20 32 34 15 3Z 1628 k9 Stelling E 1tcClellaa H£se Z13 688 75 113 B9' 69 292 2S1 41>6 295 159 2341 • Adaea o 3 0 0 ,2 0 0 0 0 0 0 o s Total 21] 691 7S 112 91 i9 292 751 41 b6 298 1S9 2346 Trait i7[ 7.8,0719 tc) 2006 Dowling A6600. Licensed to CIT1f OP CUDBiATTgD Tralilx 7.q.071S Ic) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Liceapd Co CTTT OF CVPERTDNO N V Cn &xistang + ATI + Projeet AMThu L1LC 11. 1007 14,10.37 PaBa B-1 Cupertino TIA Intaruetion Calculatima Iviracc Analysla Report Lsvel Of Service IncersactlOa Haae Future C70vtge Oel/ v/ b!1/ v/ in L,OS Vah C LOS Vale C p 1 Scewna Creek i Bubb Pt1 C- 33.0 0.639 C- 33.0 0.640 + 0.002 D/V i 2 acevttte crank i t4ry Aw C+ 37.2 0.451 C 23.7 0.488 + 1.473 D/V 6 3 9teventl Creak i SB 55 Aartpa C 38.6 0.533 [ 25.1 0.541 w 0.573 D/V ~ 4 Stevens Creek i rte t5 Rartps C- 33-9 0.682 C-• 34.5 0.699 + 0.519 D/V • 5 etavens Creek i BCtll lag Ad 0 39.4 0.754 D 31.6 0.764 + 0.161 D/V 1< S Stevens Creek 6: SAICB ~ B 13.7 0.391 B 13.7 0.395 -0.020 DN E 7 8tavana Creek L erandlay B 16.7 0-404 H 16.6 0.408 -0-063 D/V N S Btelling R 6resaleat 8 13-2 0.618 8 13.1 0.621 + 0.028 D/V p 9 Bcelliap i McClallsa D 44.5 0.705 D 44.6 0.706 + 0.015 D/V Bxisclag + ATI . Proj set AMThu Oct 11. 1007 I4 ,20,27 Page 6-3 Cupcrtian TIA IatersectiOn Calculations Laval Ot Service Canpucacica Report 3000 HCM Operations Method (Fucura Volume Alcesnaci+n) ...a.••a•aa•.aa•.ww••w..a.aa•!••.••r.•.arar•a•arw•waalrfawra••aa•f•aaa•ar•.aaaaa Internccion 111 litevanc Creek i Bubb Rd f•.e+••4•a•Ma.af afwfaf••.•af..Ra11•f ...4f4aff of •!•a•!w•w!l.wafff•a• Cycle {3ac), 130 Critleal Vol./Cap. (X): '0.640 LOetl Tima (arl* 12 (Y.R«4.0 tec) AVerege Dally (sec/veh), 33.0 Optimal Cycle, 54 . Level Of Service+ C- ••.•.fHf.f r•1 MafwHHM.r.11•+e•H•af••w1f•!•.a.•H•afa.•+f aa.f Na•ar+•+•f .•H Approach, Natt]r Bound 5ouLb Bolaid. seat SOlII1d Kest BOUm! Nweaaat, L- T- R L- T- R L- T- A L- T- R Coaczol: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights, Ov1 Include 2nclude include Nis. Gwen. 7 20 10 7 SO 10 7 SO 10 7 10 30 Lases, 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 Vblumt Modules Haas Vol: 144 it 50S 93 27 50 14 779 67 807 864 35 Or0+4th Adjt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 InitinI Hee, 144 11 505 9] 37 So 14 779 97 S07 s64~ 35 Added Volr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 PaseerByVOla 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial FUt+ 144 11 505 93 27 50 14 785 67 507 167 3S tisar Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_b0 1.60 PHF Adjr 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0-92 0.92 0.93 0.91 0.92 0.93 0.93 PHF Wlwaer 157 L2 59! 101 39 54 .18 1S] 9S 55] 942 36 Aeduet VCIr 0 D 146 0 0 97 0 6 65 0 0 3 Reduced YOls 157 12 403 101 ]9 7 is 693 ]D 5s7 942 35 PCB Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 iSLi Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pinal voi_r 1S7 i3 403 101 39' 7 15 953 30 551 943 a5 ._______.___~_______________If-._._.._.......{{.___.___-__.---{{___._.._._..__.~ . saturation Flow Nodular Sat/Laser 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 AdjvsbeenLr 0.9b 0.93 0.63 0.52 1.00 0-92 0-92 1.00 0.92 0.67 0.97 0.95 Laaad, 0.93 0.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.93 0.07 Final 9at.r 1672 126 3150 1790 i900 1790 2750 3800 1750 3150 3517 133 Capacity Analysis Module. Vol/Iat, 0.06 0.09 0.13 0.06 6.03 0.00 0.01 0.37 0.02 0.17 0.26 O.3i Crit Howe, ••!• awns wwrf e••a OreeA Tlmaa 17.3 27.5 50-3 10_8 10.6 10.8 13.5 41.1 42.1 33.8 61.3 61.3 Volvme/Cap, 0.69 0.64 0.31 0.64 0.17 0.05 0.08 0.64 0.05 0.64 0.51 0.53 Daley/Vehr 39.6 99.6 23.8 71.0 52.6 50.4 46.9 33.0 15.9 42.1 20.5 10.5 veer DelAdje 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 L.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/vehr 59.6 59.5 23.8 7i_0 32.6 50.4 46.4 35.0 25.9 12.1 20.9 20.5 LOS by Nova. B+ B+ C 8 D- D D Dw C ~ D G+ BCt43kAVgQ, 7 7 6 5 1 0 1 14 L 11 12 12 Note, Queue reported is the number o! oars per 1eae. Tratl l7c 7.1.0715 (ol 2006 Dowl lag Assoc. Liceoaed CO CITY OF CUPBRTINO Treftix 7.8.0735 (c) 2006 Dowling A6so0. LicemeA to CITY OF CUPBRTINO N V C31 V -_ _ ; N V Cn Hxistirie + ATT • Project AMihu Oct 11, 7007 14r20r27 Paga 7-1 Cupertino 7IA Iatereection CalculatlCne L4rve1 O! 9ervica COr,~utatioa P.apOrc 7000 HCM Oparecioas Method (!acute Volume Alternative) •N afN•NaN a•Naaa#aataa•N}N N•rw N•N.aNa•ea N•• NNaa•w•/a araaAN •waaaaN Intereeeti® 82 Ht even Creak G Mary Ava wa.w.aN+f w+w•af•afwa+aN fa-a•N awraN•NN•Naf NfNaw NaraN aaaf a•• w••ffa•r•N C'Yela (ewe)r 78 Critical Vol./Cap.(X), 0.488• tees Timt (see)r. ]] (Y+R+4.0 nee) Avrraga Dr1ry (sec /veh): 73.7 Optimal Cycler 46 'Laval OL Service: C Na•NAN•ww•••••NNwra N•N ww. w•p•a••a+Nea•wr•Naaawf •N a•aaw«f •N aaa•rNw Approach, i4orth Bernd south Hotmd Baae Hound I(eat Hound MOVlar7lt, L- T- R L-! - R L- T- A L- T - R ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------ll---------------I COntzels aroceeced Protected Pmteetad Prouecad Righter iocluda Ineluda Include Include Min. ttreanr 7 10 10 7 30 10 7 10 30 7 10 10 , lapse r 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 _-._--_-----I•--------------II--•------------II.....___-_..-.-II-.----.--------~ Volume Modular Hale vole 37 8 29 70 Si 177 214 1016 610 717 845 67 Growth Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Beer 37 6 29 70 11 177 214 1016 640 737 NS 67 Added Vel, 0 0 0 14 0 20 96 0 0 O 14 14 PasserByVOls D D b' 0 0 o D o 0 o D D Initial SYLt+ 37 6 29 84 11 197 300 1016 840 717 859 81 OSer Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adje 0.97 tl.97 0.1] 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.87 6.92 0.97 8.92 P(iF VpllDCar 40 7 33 92 17 209 326 1104 696 736 9N B8 Redact Volt 0 0 ZS 0 0 145 0 0 546 0 0 S7 Reduced VOlr 40 7 7 91 12 64 728 1104 Ile 236 934 71 PC8 Adir i.DD 1.00 S.oo 1.00 1.D6 1.6o i.oD L.00 1.60 1.00 S.DO 1.Da ML1 Adjr l.ao l.oo l.oD 1.DO 3.D0 s.oo l.oo S.oo l.o0 1.06 l.o0 1.00 Final VOl.r 40 7 1 !1 17 64 226 3104 149 236 931 31 ---_._.....~---------------II---------------II-----.--__.-_--ll-----------.---I Saturation Floe Modlilss Bat/Leer 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1906 1906 1900 1900 1900 1)00 1900 AdjVBimeritx D.B3 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.06 0.92 0.97 1.D0 0.92 Lfneer 2.08 0.50 0.50 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 3.00 1.00 1.00 3,D0 1.00 Final eats 7150 900 900 1750 1900 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 Capacity Aoalysia Nodules Val/Bee. 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.04 'D.19 0.19 0.08 0.13 0.16 0.02 Crit MOVetr +••• •N• •wN aaa• Graea Y'iewr 7.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 10.0 74.5 77.1 77.1 18.9 72.5 71.3 voliaae/Cape 0.14 0.05 0.p5 0.46 O.OS 0.27 0.57 0.34 0.23 0.54 0.97 0.06 Del ry/Vehx 37.2 76.6 76.8 45.6 75.7 77.1 79.0 20.0 17.5 26.9 24.3 19.4 User DelAdjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Vahr 32.2 76.6 78.8 45_6 28.7 32.1 79.0 70.0 17.5 28.9 24.3 19.6 , tae ny Mowr ' c- c c n c c- c H- H c c ACM2kAVgO: 1 O 0 3 D 2 7 7 3 6 7 1 !N •wwfwla}wN a•}aawNwNaN wA•f1• t•tawN+aw•Naw•ar K a{w Nwfaf!•lAaw1}aatafaa•• tRrter queue reported is the number o! cars par Iaaa. MailiX 7.8.0715 (C) 2006 Dowling Aaaoa. Licensed t0 CriY OF CUPHRT3M0 Hxiating + >+TI . Project AMThu Oct 11, 2007'14:20x17 Paga B-1 Cupertino TIA lncezaectioa Calculations Leval of service CoOiputation Report 7000 RCM Operatiohe Method (Future Volans A]tei7la tivel alHw •# ka••a••w•!•1{Na•a•wa•}fatewwwAaal wfw{.aa Ntt•NflNA ef••awaf at# At+•aala IateraecciOa $3 9leveaa Creek i SH 65 Ramps •aaaaa••Na•••N N•••N •a•f #•ra•+• eN•NN}••r•••awNaN ••Ha••f •f •f N+•}•aa}•ww Cycle (set)s 170 Critical Vol./Cap. (X), O.SaI Tess Time (aec)r 9 (Y+A+a.O aeC) Average Delay (8eC/veh}r 79.1 Optimal Cyelas 37 Lrval Of Serviux C +Arw+wfat••Nf•N•Nw•••a+r#Na•w}a•.wrN•wN•N••aa••a•aaaa•••••w•+•NNNNta# ApptoacA, MorTXI sound South Hocmd Haac Baasd Nest 80und MOVemenc: L- T - R L - T - R L- T- R L- i - R __-__-------I_______________II_____________..II_-____.________)I_-_____---_..__i CemtrOlx Fernlitted Protected IIermittad Protected Rights: Include Include Include Taeluda Min. Organ, 7 i0 30 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 30 10 7anea r 0 0 0 0 0, 2 1 0 0 1. 0 0 3 1 0 7 6 7 0 0 -.-._-.....-I---------------II---------------II-__.------.----II-----------_---I Volwna Modules Haee Yol, O 0 0 1067 0 101 0 1179 190 2D6 699 b Ct:'Or4th Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1ait1al Saes 0 0 0 1067 0 101 0 1174 190 206 697 0 Added Volr 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 B 0 16 3 0 PasserHyvolr a o 0 0 0 0 0 o D o D o Initial 1h1c, 0 0 0 1111 0 101 0 1180 160 222 695 0 veer Adj, i.oD 1.06 1.eD l.DD 1.Da 1.0o S.oa l.DD 1.66 i.oD i.oo l.Do PHF Adjr 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.97.0.92 0-92 PFII+ VOlYlOe, 0 0 0 1210 0 110 0 1763 196 141 755 0 Redact VO1: D 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 137 0 0 0 Reduced YOlr 0 0 C 3210 0 46 0 1783 64 741 iSb O FCR A,ajr l.DD 1.06 1.00 l.oD l:oD l.aD i.6o 1.00 1.DO 1_ao 1.00 1.00 MI,F Adjx l.oo i.6o i.6o L.oo 1.oD 1.00 l.DO 1.oD 1.00 i.oo 1.00 1.66 Flaal Vol.. 0 0 tl 1710 0 4a 0 1783 64 241 TSS 0 Saturacical ow Module: Bat/Loner 1900 1900 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900 1DD0 2900 1100 1900 1900 Adjustment, 0.97 1.00 0.92 0.87 1.00 0.17 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.93 1.00 0.92 Laneex 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 O.OD 1.00 O.OD 3.90 0,10 7.00 2.00 0.00 Final Bat.: 0 D 0 4960 0 1790 p 7195 355 3140 3800 0 --.-__-.-_.-I---------------II---------------II__...--_.------II-----.--_--.-_.I Capacity Analysis Nodular VO1/Batr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 O.OD 0.03 0.00 0.10 D-16 0.09 0.20 0.00 Cris IQevear aaa! a++! a.aw Green 711aer D.0 D.0 0.0 54.2 0.0 59.2 0.0 39.8 39.8 17.0 56.6 0.0 V011WR/Capr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.06 0.00 O.S4 0.54 0.54 0.42 0.00 Delay/Veh, 0.0 0.0~ 0.0 24.8 0.0 18.7 0_0 33.5 33.5 52.5 21.5 0.0 user DelAdjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adjnel/VeL, 0.0 0.0 0.0 74,0 0,0 18.7 • 0.0 33.5 33.5 S2,S 71.5 0.0 1,08 by Mover A A A' C A B- A C- ~ C- D- C+ MCM71UagQr 0 0 0 18 0 1 '0 10 10 6 9 0 art •w{•NawN•wwa tfAwlraAfaMwa•a!••awN wwsa+t•awaA Nla N}a}•aa N-wf wf wlN Aw {fwt MOtae Oueus ssportad is the number Of ears par lug. ira11'ix 7,9.0718 (cl ZOOB Dawling Aeaoc. Licensed to CST7t OF CDPERTJI4D N V (D 6k7atSng + ATI + Prof act AMThu Oct 11, 2007 14,30r77 Page 9-1 Cui+eztino TIA Intersection Calculations Leval Ot Service Computation Report 2000 RCM Operations Method (Future Volnma Alcernativel #•ar+l+•!r•rr•ra•sera.ar•r••f+fa•as•raaraara•agaralararr••aaa+•rf rwR••wrrr•a••r 2nCeraectiw !4 Stevens Creek 4 N9 e5 Ramos • ••1.1#!•aa••••r•rraN• Mal•atff•r•raRM'r•N •fr•a•t••••a•arlaa r••a•••f a#a•• CyCla (tee)s 120 Critical vol./Cap.(x)r 0_a99 L06a Time (seGls 11 FYaR-4.0 Bea) Avaraga Delay (sec/veG). 34.5 Optimal Cycles 61 Level O£ Services C- r-f•a•fr+a•r+••r••••}aaH•f#•+t••aa•a#r•rr•#•r•r+#a•rala#alaatrrrfa••r+•f•t•a•a• Approach: Month BOUnd south BOUnd bast Bound iPeat Bormd MOVement: L - 7 - R L - T R L -? - R L -? - R _-.--..-.-..~•-------------..f~___.____.--_•__~~_..______-.....fl-..._..-. __.__.~ Controls Split Phase Split Phase Ftotactad Permitted Righter Include Include Includes ]goose Min. Oran: 7 t0 10 7 10 30 7 10 10 7 10 SO Lanasr 0 1 0 1 b 0 0 ll D 1 1 0 3 0 D 0 0 3 0 1 volu0a Modules Hasa vale 40 101 0 228 5 4B5 881 1574 0 0 612 B33 GrOwCb Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bses 40 101 0 128 5 485 681 137a 0 O 622 537 Added VO1: 0 D 34 0 0 0 0 51 0 0 19 72 9abaerByvol: 0 D 0 0 0 a 0 O D •0 D 0 7a1tial Futs 40 101 34 228 S 48D 681 1825 0 0 641 SSS vxr Adjr 1.6D l.oD l.DO l.oo l.oa 2-DO 1.00 1.DD i.oo l.DD i.oo o.Do PFD?' AQj: 0.92 0.91 0.92 D. 92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 D.32 b.00 PHF vOlulsts 43 110• S7 248 S 527 X746 1786 0 0 697 0 Redact vole 0 0 0 0 0 268 0 D 0 0 0 417 Redue<d Vols 43 110 37 248 8 299 740 1766 0 0 897 0 PCB Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.G6. 0.00 MLF Adjs 1.00 1.06 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final Vol_: l3 110 37 248 s 259 740 1711 D 0 897 0 seturatiw Flow FWdul<s Btt/Loner 1900 1900 1900 19D0 1960 1900 1900 1900 1900 19D0 1900 1900 Adjus CBRnte 0.95 0.98 0.95 0.92 6.92 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Ltuleat 0.46 1.15 0.39 0.65 0.01 1.34 2.00 3.00 D.00 0.00 7.00 1.00 Final 6at.s 821 2078 899 1133 ZS 2341 31s6 9700 0 0 5?00 1750 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/8ata O.OS 0.04 0.09 0.22 D.22 0.11 0.27 0.31 D.OD 0.00 0.12 0.00 Crit MOMaar #-rr •+•• rr•• •••a Orrin 2Lser 10.0 10.0 10.0 17.2 37.2 37.7 40.0 60.8 D.0 O.D 70.1 0.0 volusBe/Caps 0.63 0.83 0.63 0.71 0.71 0.38 0.71 0.61 0.00 0.06 0.71 D.00 DslFq/Veh, 63.0 63 s0 82.0 42.2 41.2 32.8 38.9 22.2 0.0 0.0 50-9 0.0 llBar Del?djr 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDal/Nabs 63.0 aa.D 61.0 41.1 41.2 32.8 38.9 12.2 0.0 0.0 90.9 0.0 L45 by MOV@r- S H R D b C= D+ Cw A A D RCH2kAv9Q, S S 5 ll 14 6 15 16 0 0 9 0 •+ra•fa•a•araaa#wa•r#a##.•#a#a..#••.•aaa•••#r!#r•a••a•••••••«•a.a r+lalRaRRraaaa T70tes gnaw zepcrcad is the Dumber o£ toss per lane. TraE£ix 7.8.0715 tc) 2006 Dowling AsaDC. Licensed to Ci1R OF CUPBR2SN0 EXiat 1179 * ATI + Pxnj eCt AMThu Oct 11. 2007 3L 20,27 Page 10-1 Cupertino TIA Iateraeetion Caltv].a bons Level 0! Service Computation Report 2000 sCN Operations Method (Future volume Altarnati~N) r•rR•aa Rr+awaaa N a+rNf+r•r•frru•••a+•a•raaa•ra+rerea++•wf•«araaaatrrr!•afarr• Iatersectiolt 115 3tsvena Creak a Btelling Rd a+r Hrlfarr•a•ra•Kfw••as W a••f•!Ha•:M+faaa#N•a+r••ralw•wwla••a•af. r•HrrraH Cycle (seCls 90 Critical Vo1.1Cap.(X)r 0.764 L08a Time (ace)s 12 (Y*R-4.0 sec) Avera9a De19y (sec/veh), 39.6 Optimal Cycles 67 Level 0£ Services D !•+}N•••lraN as•aaa•fa•rf-rR•If•+H•ffat•rRilia rfaaa+of laaLf•rfa•af••aa •atfrRRR Approach: Droreh Hound South Bound 6eaL HOIDlO west Bound MoventlYlt s L- T- R L-?- R L- T- R L- T - R CODtrol+ PxOCected Protected Protected Protected Rights: include include lnclvde Include Mia. Dr<anr 7 30 30 7 10 10 7 30 LO 7 10 30 Lancer 1 0 2 O 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 D 2 0 3 0 1 Volume Modular Base YO1r 393 557 249 213 354 231 252 477 193 571 822 143 GrOfrth Adjs 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial 9ser 393 557 240 213 35a 231 25a 977 L93 571 912 143 Added VD1r ] 0 0 0 0 B 4 9 2 0 17 0 PaBSerayvol, D D D D D D D a D o D a 2nitial Fats 396 557 248 213 354 239 756 485 L95 571 839 143 User Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 P}W Adjs 0.91 D.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.82 0.92 0,81 0.92 0.92 PiDr r)017E1@7 430 105 210 732 3B5 180 178 517 212 621 911 155 Psducc Volr 0 0 204 D 0 206 0 0 B1 0 O 122 traduced Vol: 430 605 BB 132 385 54 278 917 131 621 911 33 P[B Adje 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. D0 1.00 l.oo i.oo 1.Ob 1,00 1.00 MLF Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.b0 3.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 L. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 Final vo1.r 430 fi05 66 232 385 54 27a 927 131 621 913 33 9aturatioa Flow Modules gat/[.rxia, •1900 1900 1900 1400 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustmsats 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.93 1.00 0.92 Idn06r 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.36 O.i1 2,00 ].00 1.00 Final Sat.r 1790 380D 1750 1750 3800 1750 1750 4484 1114 3150 5700 1750 cepscity Anslyale raduie: Vol/Sets 0.29 0.16 O~G4 0.13 D.30 0.03 0.16 0.11 O.I2 0.20 0.16 0.07 Cr1t MOVaBI ae•+ rasa • • aaa+ OYeea Timer 29.0 11.4 21.4 18.6 11.9 11.9 18.5 139 13-9 23.2 18.6 18.6 Volvaa/Caps 0.76 0.64 0.15 0.64 0.76 0-23 0.77 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.77 0.09 Delay/VSh: 36.9 33.6 ]7.1 41.1 48,1 37.3 48.8 41.9 42.9 37.6 38.7 29.4 Veer OelAdjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.OC 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/veh, 36.9 33.6 27.1 41.1 48.2 37.3 48.8 42.9 42.9 77.8 36.7 29.4 IA9 by F7CWes Da C- C D D D+ D D' D D+ Da BCM2kAvgD: 13 8 2 7 7 2 10 8 0 11 !0 1 r#aa•+ra•rraru•r•r•ra+ra aaa•+u•rf-ara•+ra•rr•a•f KfrRa+Ra•r•r•aatrarr!•r rrrru lFOter queue reported is eha ml0msr DS cars per lane. Traf£ix 7.8.0715 Ic1 2006 Da+liDg ASaOC. Licensed Lo CTTY OP CUPBRTINO N V C0 O Sxistlag + ATI • Project AMThu Oet 11. 7007 14,20,37 Page 11-1 Cupertino TIA mtesssction Caleulatians Level Ot Service corporation Report 2000 MQS Operations MetF10d (7utura Volume Altacnacive) •arfarrrrr•rasa.alraara•a+rfaeraa•••.•faer•r++•+rr wrarwrafrf••+•afraaraaaarr•ar Intersectl~ 116 6Levens Creek F SAICR raraaraa.ar.w•aarra•.rafraar«•«aaa raw a+r•r•fa••aa.arrrr•aa«aaaaa+a afa•fara•ra Lycla (set)s 110 Critical Vol./Cep. (x)r 0.345 Loss Time (sec), 9 (7+A.4.0 Sec) Average Dslay Iseo/veri)r 13.7 Opttmel Cycle, 36 Lsvel Of 8ervica: B • •• aa••araira af•Nfar«rf•aa•w•raraf•i•ra••+4•frrraa of a•fffarff ••aaaaffrra/ Approach, MOrth Hatnd South Botmd Eaet BODT1d Matt Bovad Mwamentr L T - A L- T - 'R L- T- R L- T- A -----.__-___~-----°-___-_--II---------------II---_____---.---II---------------i ContrOle YarmiLCed PZOLlCCld PYOtaCCld Permitted R1~1csr Include include Include Include Min. Orawc 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10, 7 10 10 Lanes, D 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 Srlsciaq + AT1 * Droj acC AMThu Oct 11, 2007 14r39,77 Pa9a 12-1 Cupertino TIA Iateraaccion celculatioae bevel Of Sarvlca Co0pliCacion Report 3000 BGM Opazaeione Method (iLCUre Volume A1Carnacive) aa«raaaaar•r«raafa•ra•ar•aarrraaa••eraarraarrra«aaa•rrrr+farafraffaa+•f •a•ar• intaraaecion 97 Stesnenr Creek r< Brandley •aa.afar•a•a.•••f+sr «.r+•.fera••.fa•r•«arr••+rraaea.rrar•arwaa•r•r •+••••••• Cyel• {sac)r 110 Critical VoI./Cap. (xl+ O.t09 [aaa T19e (sec), 12 (YaR•4.o eecl Average Delay (aaclwh)r 16.6 Optimal Cycler 3! Le+el Of 9arvicer B aw•r affrraraffa•f••raa•aara afK•+r rff••rw•Nif•afafra r•raara •a«a••r!•+rar•+aa rff Approach, North DaOnd South Eotald 5aac Bovod Wes[ BOtald Movee,att r L - T - A L- T- R L- T- A L- T- R ------------I---------------II------..--.----II-.--.-.-.--_-; -II-_..--..---.---I CoaLrol: 4ermitLad Permitted Protected Protected Rightsc Include Include Iacluda Include Min. Grasar 7 30 10 7 10 IO 7 10 10 7 10 10 Lassa, 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 3 O 1 1 0 7 1. 0 Wlvme Modeler Base Vol, 0 0 0 34 0 103 299 1124 0 0 977 80 fmowth Adjr i.0a l.DO 1.00 l.oD 1.00 i.aD 1.00 3.DD 1.00 1.00 S.oO 1.00 Initial Baas 0 0 0 34 0 101 239 1174 0 D 977 60 Addtl Voi r o ~ D 0 0 0 0 0 9 O 0 17 0 PaesarByVOlr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 Initial 3Utr 0 0 0 34 0 103 319 1137 0 0. 994 60 Dser Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PRP Adj, 0.97 0.!] 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.93 0.97 0.93 0-93 0.92 0.91 0.92 PBF VO1Umer 0 0 0 37 O 173 7B7 1730 O 0 1080 s9 RaducC Valr 0 0 0 0 0 91 O 0 0 0 0 41 Reduced Wlr O 0 0 17 0 71 2B2 1130 0 0 1090 24 F® Adjr 1,00 l.oo l.oo l.DD 1.OD l.oo i.0o i.DD l.oa a.oo 1.09 1.00 MIP Adjr l.oD 1.00 l.DD i.oo 1.09 1.DO l.o0 1.00 1.09 l.DO S.oa 1_00 Final Vol.r 0 0 0 37 0 31 387 1730 0 0 1080 34 ------------ ---------------il--•------------Il---------------II---------------I 8acuracion F~ow Module. eat/Leaar LB00 1900 1900 1900 1100 1100 1100 1900 1900 1900 1900 1100 Adj0et31reaLs 0.97 1.00 0.93 0.97 1.00 0.83 0.93 1.00 0.93 0.9] 1.00 0.97 Laneec 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.. 0 0 0 1750 1900 1780 1790 8700 0 0 5700 1740 ------------ - - ----------ll---------~ Capaoity yais Modular VoI/Sat+ 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.03 0-00 GY1t Mavess Green Times 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 VOlvBq/Cep, 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.33 0.00 Deley/Vehs 0.0 0.0 0.0 49,t O.D veer DelAdjr l.o0 1.00 1.90 1.00 s.oo Adjnallveh, o.o o.o o.D 49.a D.o LO9 by Movsa' A A A D A BCM2kAVgpa 0 D 0 1 0 «1r«aarara«lraf arraNf•I of rarra•rar•fa•r. •-----ll---------~ D.ol o.la o.33 •rar rrfa 10.0 41.8 9I.0 0.13 0.43 0.7a 47.7 37.3 3-7 l.oo i.oo l.oo N.7 37.3 3.2 D- C A 1 B 3 ,r-ararra Kfraf ail ....--il---------------I 0.00 O.OD 0.19 0.01 wrr• O.D 0.0 49.7 49.2 0.00 0.00 0.41 O.OI 0.0 D-0 71.3 17.1 1.00 l.o0 1.DO l.DD o.o o.D 21.1 17.1 A A C+ ~ D D 0 8 0 N«afaerrlalffN+affrrw- Muter Quaw reported is LM nunber of ears per lana_ lrafiiu 7.8.0715 Ic) 1006 Dowling Assoc. Lioensad t0 CITY OF [f7P8A1'IRO VolraOe Modules Beae VO1, 16 24 7 36 9 2a 150 754 arowLh Adja l.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.o0 1.00 Initial Bser 14 34 3 3fi 9 74 150 7E4 Addsd voir d D o a o D o a PascerByVOla o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77+itial Futr i4 34 7 D6 9 . 74 150 762 veer Adja 1.0o i.oo S.oo 1.00 l.oo l.DD i.DO i.oo FRP Aajr D-92 0-92 0.93 0.91 8.97 0-93 0.92 0.91 PAS' Volunas 15 16 7 39 30 26 183 931 Aadue! Vbl+ 8 0 3 D 0 17 0 0 Reduced VOlr 15 16 0 39 30 9 183 838 PC8 Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.00 ia,P Adj, l.o0 1.oa 1.a0 1.DD 1.oD 1.09 l.oo l.Do Piae1 •vol-r 15 76 0 39 10 9 163 828 20 38 1137 108 l.DO i.DO l.ao 1.00 70 19 1137 106 D o 17 0 0 0 0 0 30 78 1154 IDS 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 0,43 0.93 0.97 0.97 33 30 1354 117 4 0 0 10 z3 3D izs4 l07 S.9o a.oo i.oD l.oD 1.oa 1.00 i.DD l.ao 17 30 1341 107 Saturation Flow Modeler Bet/Laaea 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 pdjveteraita 0.95 0-95 0.91 0.95 0.98 0.9a 0.93 1.00 0.92 0.97 0.99 0.95 Leaeer 0.37 0.63 1.00 D-80 0-20 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.75 0.34 Pinal Sat.. 663 1137 1750 1440 380 1750 1750 3700 1750 1750 5138 442 ------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module Vol/Sat, 0.03 6.03 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.01 O.D9 O.1S 0.01 0.03 0.74 0.34 Crlt MOVaea rwfr •rrr rrff Oreaa Timer 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10_0 10.0 70.4 61-1 63.2 26.8 63.6 63.6 Volnms/Cap. D-2S 0.25 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.06 0.12 0.16 0.01 0.07 0.11 0.42 Del ay/Vehr 50.1 50.1 4S.S 31.3 51.3 46.4 90.1 12.9 10.9 32.1 13.3 13.3 veer a.lAejr l.oo i.oo i.DO 1.00 1.oD 1.00 l.DO 1-oD l.ao l.ao 1.00 l.Do AdjDel/Vahr SD-1 E0.2 45.5 51-3 S].3 46.4 40.1 13.9 10.9 33_1 13-3 33.7 149 oY Move: n n ti a- a- n n B B+ e- a ACT43kAVgQr 2 1 0 ] 2 0 E S 0 1 9 9 frr Nrafrarrrrf••aa•aarff H•aarlfarfaffarffa•rw••fwa•r •a rf•N •afelaf+a!«a+ffaNr NOtec Queue reported is the nurtber o! care per lane. Traffix 7.9.0715 Ic) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Lleeased to CITY OF CUF6ATIN0 Fxisclny + RTT + ProjaeC AMfhu Oct 11, 2D07 14,20,17 Page 13-1 Ctlpar tiro TU Ineereacelon Chlculatitins Leval Ot 8arviee Co4~uta cion Rsyort 1000 HCM Operatione Method (3bCCra volume Altezaative) erfelN fearaN NrN•f •Nlaffaf Nf fN aflRRNaNNaaillf a Naiaf atf 4/k.R Of Nkaafslf Intersectitlh #1 Stalling a CII eenleaf NfaNieea ifN aaN«Rf •Rla ffaRa NRNf ifN •!aN•N aaf M•iaN Reifa•aafiN aeai•ii«af CycL (MC)a 90 Crl tical VO1_/Cap.(R1t 0.611 Goes 71ae (sec), 11 Cl+M4.0 sec) Avarnge Delay lace/veh)a 13.1 OpCimai Cycle, 49 Level O! 9artri tea 8 faa aa•rraii•ar NaaN••Ifa1•l•alaa NlNaaaN i/N arirlN ilfaaaf f rf RfiN ref flf Na•R ApFrearha North Batrnd 6euch corned bast Epund Hast etD,md Movenenca L- T - A L- i- R L- T- R L - T - A .___________~_______________jj_-_______.-____j1--._-__.__.____11_______________I Control, Permitted Fermltced Paradetted Permitted Righcev IDClude inClCde Include include Min. Oraana 7 30 30 7 10 10 7 10 30 7 30 10 Lams. 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 D 1! 0 0 0 0 11 O 0 -----...----~_______________II-----..--------II--_--._.-_.----lf-----.-.---_---I Volume 3bdula, 8asa Vol, 14 672 1i 9 605 50 109 20 31 34 15 D2 Orowch Adja 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial See: 14 671 14 9 605 5D 109 20 32 34 15 32 Added vole 0 1 D 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Paseer8yVO1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lniclal Futa 14 676 24 9' 613 80 109 10 31 34 16 31 Usa! Adjr 1.00 1.0tl 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FTff adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.92 D.92 0-92 0.92 0.D1 0.92 3RD?' volume, 16 735 26 10 666 S4 Sle 11 35 37 16 3b Re:Itlet vpl, 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 i' D 0 16 Reduced Vol, 1b 735 1b 30 666 61 116 11 27 37 16 9 Pcs Adj, 1.DD l.o0 1.DD 1.aD x.oo 1.DO I.DD i.DD 1.00 1.0o S.oo 1.oD MLF Adjt 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i-00 1.00 Final VO1., 15 735 25 10 666 61 11B 11 27 37 16 9 ------------I---------------Il------_-_------II---------------ll----___-_------1 BaturaCioo Floe Module, Sac/Loner 190D 1400 190D 1900 1900 1900 3900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Mjti6tr4eDts 0.92 0.92 0_92 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 D.93 0.92 0.92 D~91 lanes: 0.02 0.95 0.03 0.03 0.93 0.07 0.71 0.13 0.16 0.60 0.36 D.it Final lat.: 34 1699 67 11 1602 121 1242 128 lei 1042 460 tai ------------I----------•----II-----------°---II---------------II-----•---------I Capacity Analysis Module, Vol/Sat: 0.44 0.41 0.44 O.d2 0.41 0.41 0.10 0.10 0.10 0-04 0.04 4.04 Grit Movaa, rfse saga Gzean Tdmar 64.1 64.2 64.2 64,2 64.2 61.1 13.8 33.8 13.6 13.8 13.8 13.B Volume/Capr 0.61 0.62 0.62 D.ffiB O.SB 0.49 0.62 0.67 0.57 0.13 0.73 0.13 Dalay/veh, 9.0 9.D 9.0 0.3 B.3 8.3 46.0 46.0 46.0 35.4 1s.4 35.4 Dear DalAdja 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 i.00 AdjDel/Vehr 9.0 9.0 9.0 8.3 8.3 a.3 46.D 46.0 46.0 35.4 35.4 35.4 L,DB by Move, A A A A A A D A D D+ li+ D 7(CM2kAvgOr 12 12 12 11 13 11 6 6 / 2 ] 3 raf•Rf}eatel/atf llrNllf rfr~~iff rrf araflaN afrrfN afa•aaflRaarflfaarffaaa Haa}N Note, Oueue raPCxtsd is tDa riumeer of cars Per lane. Tzattl7[ 7.1.0718 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed W CITY OF CDPHRTINO N V Existing + ATI + PrOj eCt AMThU DCt 11. 1007 14r20,27 Page ll-1 Cuperc l7w TLA interaeccion Celculacions Level Of Sesvlca Computation RepOn 1000 RCN Operations Merhad (future Volume Alcernactve) aRifaRkaaaar N rl affkf a/!f /f of 1fa NRf lfrrrNNaNaNaakklaf •f /lN aalrl lf• if tf Naa incereaeCion R4 Stalling r McClellan R•laaf!•aarfN flfraf•ariaar NRN it Rt fie«faf aaf Rlf iRffRariaaN aafRt NaRalfeea•!la Cycle (Racy. 120 Critical Vol./dp.(R): 0.706 Loss Tine (sec)t 12 (Y«R.4,0 sec) Avarag! bexay Iaae/vah)r 44.6 Optimal Cycles 63 Laval O1 6ervLce, D lflNaa•efffrfrr/lRaaaaraaaarlRfR~rrN krearalfff«alefaelaf a•aaafefakaakaaa of/Ii«• ApproacA, North Bound 6outh 8ormd East Bouad Meat Hound MOVemerita L- T - R L- T - A L- T - R L- T - R ____________~ ...............II.______________~i__._-_.___,____11-___________-._I Concrolr Protected Protected Protected Protected Rightst Include include IAClude Include Min. Oreeria 7 10 10 7 LO 10 7 10 SO 7 10 10 Lana6r 1 0 1 1 0, 1 0 2 1 0 ! 0 0. 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 volume Modulaa lase Vol. 113 6B8 7$ 113 /9 69 291 161 41 56 295 159 Growth Adja 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.Otl 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial nee: 213 sae 75 113 89 69 391 161 41 56 293 159 Added vo2r 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 PasserHyVOla 0 0 D 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7ltitial PDCr 213 691 75 113 91 69 292 751 41 56 295 159 User Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 FRF Adj, 0.91 0.97 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.92 D.91 0.92 0.91 0.93 0.91 0.92 FFLF VO1W4et 231 751 s1 123 99 74 317 273 45 6I 371 173 Reduce Volr 0 0 36 D 0 13 0 D li o 0 744 Reduced Vei, 232 751 46 113 99 42 317 273 34 61 321 19 P~+ Adj, i.DD i.oD 1.oD l.DO i.oD i.no i.oa I.DD l.oD i.oa 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj, 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 Fiaal Vol.r ]32 751 46 123 99 51 317 173 34 61 311 19 ____..____--I_______________II._____......__.11__.----.____.__II__...____.__---I Saturation Flow Nodule: Sat/Laaar 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 3!00 Adjuetmant: 0.91 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.9D 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.91 1.00 0.92 Lancer 3.00 i.66 0.11 1.00 1.29 O.T1 1-DO 0.89 0.11 1.00 1.00 3.00 Final Sat.a 1750 3499 211 1780 1424 1174 3750 1603 197 1750 1900 ]750 ----------°I---------------ll---------------II---------------II---------°----I capacity Analysis Module: VO1/fiats 0-13 0.11 0.72 tl~07 0.04 O.D4 0.16 0.17 0.1T 0.03 0.17 0.01 Grit Moveat Nf/ Nr• «r1f ffN 44,'e9n Tiaras 29.8 36-8 36.8 11.9 19.7 18.7 30.8 44.3 44.3 35.2 26.7 19.7 Voltage/Cape 0.57 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.26 0.18 0.71 0.48 0.46 0.27 O. T1 0.07 DelayNehr 43.7 40.7 40.7 73.8 45.6 45.8 49.1 31.1 31.1 50-5 50.7 35.7 !tsar DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Vaha 43.7 40.7 40.7 ?3.1 15.6 45.6 48.5 31.1 3i,1 50.5 50.7 35.7 IAl by Nnver D D D B D D D C C D D D+ l03427cAVy0. 9 14 14 6 J 3 13 9 9- 1 12 1 lie afff lff NNfaafaAarN Nlaa• flaaNaMffN lraffaffiN Nf NrAfef f fiRN Nf}rf rt/a Noce: Qraaue reported L^ the ritvttber Of cars per lane. Traciix 7.!.0715 (c) 2006 Dowling Aa90e. Licensed co CITY OF CUPSRTINO 27 - 162 Sklating r ATI t Psoj eCt PnThu Sap •27, 2007 15s41s26 Page 1-2 Scenario Repoz scenarios Existing ~ ATI + project PM Peak Comaends Existing • ATI + Project PN Volumes 8xiatiag + ATI . Pzojeec PM Peak }buz Gesxretzy: Exisei~ • ATI r Praj pM IttBsact Pae: Default Impact Fea Trip Generation: Praj act PM Trip Distributioiis Daily . pathos ~ befaule paths Roucess Dalault Routes ConlSgurations Default ConliguratSon TraEtix 7.8.0715 ic1 2006 Dowding Asaoe. Licensed to CITY OF NPRRTTNO N v W Existing • ATi . Project PMTbu Sep 27, 2007 15x44:28 Page 2-I Trip Oenezation Report forecast faZ Project PM Zone ~ Race Race trips Tzips Total t Ot p Subtone Amouat Units in Out In Ouc Tiipe Total 1 1.00 Project 49.00 203.00 99 203 252 200-0 1 1.DO o.oo o.oo D o 0 0.0 Zone 1 Subtotal ............................. 49 203 252 100.0 TOTAL .................................................. 49 203 232 100.0 Traffix 7.8.0713 {c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF CUPERTING N V 01 A Iixisting + ATI + pr07eCt ptiThu Sep 27, 1007 15s4ts29 Page 3-1 Trlp HiscributioH Report Percent Ot Tsips Haiiy • To Dazes 1 2 ~ 4 5 6 ypne _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ 1 40.0 30.0 5.0 7.0 3.0 15.0 ' Tnltlk 7.9.0715 Scl 2006 Howling 3lesoc. Licensed to C1TY Ot CDD3'RTINO Bxiating + ATI + pro3ecc pMlhu Sep 27, 2007 1544:28 - Page 4-1 SUrniag MDvamene Report ' prof eeC PM ' volwe Nozehbound Southbound Baatbotmd xeatbound Total ' Type Left Tltn1 RightLett Thzv flight Leff Thzu Right Lett Thzu AighC Volume Al Stevens Creek k BOEb Rd Base 97 19 477 64 14 14 24 868 139 509 T72 84 3082 Added D o a a ~ D o 0 2 o e iD D 12 Total 93 19 177 64 19 Sa 24 870 139 509 782 94~ 3094 ' 82 8tw~e Creak k Nary Ave Base 245 23 48 152 38 124 388 1718 588 305 1188 123 4896 Added 0 0 0~ 51 0 76 37 0 0 0 6 6 176 Total 445 23 48 203 38 200 405 1716 586 005 1174 129 5072 83 Stevens Creek B SS 85 Rams Base 0 0 0 1205 6 751 0 1036 173 ~ 444 739 0 4354 Added 0 D 0 a0 0 0 0 2 0 61 10 0 93 Total 0 0 0 1225 8 751 0 1038 173 505 749 0 a447 !4 Stevens Creek k N3 s5 Ranps Base 54 283 0 259 1 530 491 1904 0 0 934 949 5409 Added 0 0 15 0' 0 D 0 22 0 0 71 S1 189 Total 54 283 15 258 1 530 491 1931 0 0 1009 1030 4598 $5 Stevens creek 6 steiiing Rd Bab! 331 396 414 383 547 273 268 923 219 878 3282 252 5983 Added 1 0 0 9 0 3 14 70 8 0 7• 0 81 Total 332 396 414 783 547 278 282 853 224 678 1269 252 6028 R6 Stevens Creak 4 SAICB ' Base 0 0 0 96 0 187 337 1993 0 0 1415 •6D 6088 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 .0 0 7 0 37 Total 0 D 0 98 0 187 337 2023 0 0 1422 60 4125 R7 sceveas Creek 6 Brandley Rase 70 'IB 40 299 16 112 443 1580 53 105 1507 107 4338 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 7 0 37 Total 70 16 40 299 16 112 443 1910 53 105 1514 107 1375 •8 8tciling k DreenleaL ease 16 657 22 2L 968 35• 55 11 45 24 21 24 1869 Added 0 14 O 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Total 18 671 12 21 971 35 55 11 2b 24 31 24 1896 89 8telling k McCiellaa Sass 129 369 72 330 626 I93 174 418 129 133 380 154 3096 ' Added D I 0 O 8 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0- 7 Total 126 370 73 370 632 193 174 418 129 133 380 154 3103 /10 Base D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' D 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 37 0 0 76 8 193 " Total. 0 0 O~ 0 0 76 0 37 9 0 76 6 199 Traitix 7,9.0715 (e) 2006 Howling Assoc. Lleensed to CITY OF CVPBRTIRG • v Existing , AT7 + Project PM'1'hu Sep 27, 2007 i5 ~44s28 Page 4-2 Existing + ATI + Project 1R•:'1'hu Sea 27, 2007 IS s44:29 Pegs S•i VOlutM a'OYChbOUnd SOUthDntmd Eastbound westbound Total Impact Analysl9 Report Type Lalt Thzu Right Lelt~7hrU Right Lott ThrV right Leit Tbzu Right vOluak Lwal O! Service • Intaraectlan Baaa FuLU7! ,Chang! Del/ v/ Del/ V/ itl • L08 v!h C LOS veh C $ 1 Stevens Czeak i Bubb Rd C 27.4 0.654 C 27.3 0.854 : 0.040 D/V 4 2 Stevens Creek i Mary Ave C-. 34.6 0-716 D+ 37.1 0.782 + 2.708 D/V 0 3 Stevens Creek c S8 85 Ramps C- 34.9 0.850 D+ 76.3 0:874 + 1.390 D/V ~ 4 SClVlna Creek i nB 85 Ramp3 D+ 37.4 0.798 D+ 38.9 0.808 • 0.949 D/V d 9 Stevens Czeak c 8tellirg Rd R+ 56.4 0.902 E+ 57.3 0.910 + 0.900 D/V # 6 8twlns Creek G BAICR B 14.9 0.544 B 14.8 0.545 -0.089 D/V • 8 7 Stwans Czeak 4 Srandley C- 33.1 O.a62 C- 33.0 0.864 -0.052 DN • A 8 Stalling a Gzeealea! B 14.7 0.805 B 19.8 D.808 + 0.128 D/V _ 8 9 Stalling i McClellan D 45.6 0.818 D 45.7 0.818 + 0.074 D/v Trafiiz 7.8.0715 fcl 2006 Dowling Assoc. Lieease6 to CITY DF CDPERTINO TzalEix 7.8.0723 (c) 2008 Dowling Aasac. Licensed to CITY OF CUP3RTIN0 N V ~o ~o N 0[11C2t6tdfU 30 JGLIJ o7 paSUaoT1 •oosaY BuTinoa 900E (o) 5tL0.8'L xT33+~L •avai and 0x00 3o xaciuut aqa sF paasodu aaanp raa0D1 ••fr•f 11rr•rlrr•r•1••rr•rlfr•rf•tr•rr••rr•tf•rat.rwrrr•rsr•slrr••b•r.•rrr•••r• T ET fL YT 6L SI i t Ot I L 9 =06nYKZrnOH +a •a J .7 b a a e a a -a +anow +(4 90'I 0'9L f'SC tl'ES 5'0£ 9'OE 8'Bf @'SS 6'6E L'S9 9'[9 9'Ei 6'iS +qan/taaLDY 00'L 00'i 00'L 00•T 00'T 00't 00'T 00'T 00'L 00'T OD'L DO'L =GpYiaa aaalL D'9L E'SE 6'ES S'OE 9'OE 6'BE B'Si Y•QE L'S9 9•E6 4'Ei 8'65 +qaA/+~iaa 00't 00'L 00'T DO't DO'L OQ'T 00•T DO'T 00'L 00•L 00'L 00'T +~P'K ~iaa o•D D•o D•o o•D o•o o•o o•D o•o D•D o•o D•o o•o =IaaOaMaTijT 6'0, E'E Z'LT 5'4 4'f 0'6 T'9 E'L L'iC CY E'L L'LI riaa70maaovi 9'SZ D'LE 9.9E 0'SL 0'LL 8'iL r 6C t•8E 0'T6 f't6 E•t6 L'Li =tan uso3FLYt OT'0 9C 0 LB'0 b9'0 LB'0 9L'0 9i'0 9I'0 L6'0 6i'0 bL'0 EG'0 +da~/amnion 5'62 5'6L 0'LL L'6E L'6f L'EE L'EI L'£L f'ST 0'OS 0'OI 8•TT ~=amFt aaaxD r•fa •rtt wr1 =9MOw iFs, 20.0 LL'O iT'0 cL'0 EE•0 SL'0 90'0 ZO'0 Et'0 LO'0 CO'0 80'0 +3aS/ion :aLnpow sF6Jtiamt .i7Taada~ OSLL OOLS OSLT OSLi OOLS OSLT OSLT OOBL OSLT f8i GTET 09Lf +'7aS LtuTi 00'L 00'f 00'L OD'I 00'£ OD't 00'L 00't 00'T LE'D YL'0 00'L raam•I C6'0 00'T L6'0 L6'0 00'L Z6'0 L6'0 00'T L6'0 56'0 S6'D EB'0 +70amaln GTN OO6t 0062 OD6L 006I OO6T OObT OO6T OO6T 006T 006T 006T 006T +avaR/705 =etnPOw void ttOi76artaeS t5 PEEL LEf 6L6 S96T 06- 60T Li T2L 6 SL 99L +'i0n ieaTd 00'L 00'T DO't OD'T 00'T 00'i 00'T OO•t 00'T 00'I 00'L 00'T =GPY d'W 00't 00'T 00'T 00'I 00'i OD•t 00'S 00'T 00'L 00't OD'I 00•T +GiN 9Jd ZS PEEL LfE 6c- S98L 06- 60T Ti tzL 6 St 992 +ioA paonp~at[ e9 0 0 Hst D o eDt a o F- o D +LOA axtpan 06T 9L2T L£E LE9 S9tT Oi- LTL Ti LZL LS SZ 99L +atmlLcA 3Kd Lb'0 L6'0 Z6'0 Z6'D Z6'0 C6'0 L6'0 26'0 L6'0 L6'0 L6'0 L6'0 +FPtt dgd O D't 00'T 00'T 00'T 00'T 00'L 00'I 00'I 00't 00'T 00'2 00'T +LpY zacn 6Zt iLit 50E 965 9YLt SOi ODL BE EOL ai Ct Sit =703 T@F7FUl D o 0 0 o D o a o 0 0 0 =tavteaassva 9 9 0 0 0 Lf 9c 0 TS 0 0 0 =ToA pappY fLS tl9TT SOf 965 9TLT 89[ -ZT 6E CST tl6 EL S6L +aag ieTiFuT 00't 00'T 00'2 00'L 00.2 00'T OD'L 00'T 00't 00'2 00'T 00'L =CPY ganoap ELT 89Tt SOE 995 PEEL tl9E bZT Bf LSi B- CL 56L :ioA aseg •aTM?oji awnioA L 0 E 0 L S 0 E 0 L T 0 L 0 T 0 S D 0 Z =save'I OT OT L Oi OL L OS OT L OT OI L +vaaxp -uFw apniottl apnTovl aPL~I~I apnixI =s7gBFtl paaoiaotd Paaaa70ad pa3Da7otd PaaOaiOad +LO1avoJ _______________~~-___-__-__-____II______________-~~-...,___--_-_-,-I...---______ tt - s- z n- t- a B- s- z s- z- 4 +aQawnow ptmog aeaM P+rnce aae5 PunOg g7twS Pence gaxoN =4DtoxddY t•r••rr••t•rrr•I+t••••t.r•.1••••.•rw•••••rrrr•r•u•••r••••••r•••1•«•fft..••••• +a raOFnxaS 30 Sanrl L9 +aio+U iemtid0 T'Lf +Igan/oas) .Caiaa aBexanY Ions 0'-+8ta) GT +IOx) amFZ ssoz ZSL•0 +IX)'de~/•IOA I*oFaFaJ OOT r(ose) siOlC7 •.••r•rffrt••t•'•rr•••••••••••st.r•••••••••••rw••••••••.•••••••••w••r•.•rr.•••r anY .Caew 3 1(aax~ svaaa7S"Ltl 00t7oasaaivI •••1t••rr•t•fist..r•••r••r•••••t•••t••••fr••rr•r•rr•••1•f •f •••f•••1•!ff•r•t•••t1 (an?aaaseaiY amnion amand) poyaaw svosaaxad0 W~p ooot aaoda)1 coFavandmoo aoTnaaB 70 iana'1 GNZSUSdJL7 d0 I.LIO Oa piaWOp7 •OOSSY BtITinOa 900E (al SLLO'8'L XF33axS •aLn2L Sad sxea 30 :agmnv aq7 sT paixodu agaca =alai a.r1•+rrrrrtrr N•Hr•rrr tf r•f f•••Nar••Ir rr••f rrrN •rrI rrr••tH r•r1•tr•If Ir1 IOS DL OT t CT T 0 T f i S 5 +()BnYHWJg e +a .~ ~ a a a +g +~ s s =avow .(v saT 9'8T 9'ST L'LE E'OL 6'LC E'C6 L'Si Y'Li 6'SS L'ZL L'D9 L'09 +~A/TaaFpY 00'L 00'T 00'L OD't 00't 00't 00'2 00'T 00'L 00'T 00'2 00'T +CpY[aa asafl 9'4L 9'fiL L'LC £'OL .8'LL E'L- L'4i r cr e'SS L'LZ L'09 Z'09 +tpn/+iaiaa 00'L DO'T 00'L 00'L 00'T 00'T 00'L 00'T 00'T 00'2 00't 00't =CpY Aaiaa 0'0 0.0 0'0 0'0 0'D 0'O O.0 0'0 0'0 D•D 0'0 0.0 +TaananpaTuI L'0 L'0 T'L L'0 6'T 6'D L'0 i'L 8'tl S'0 •9'Et 5'CT =Laaa•= == 9'6T 8'iT L'6f S'OL 0'9Z 6't6 5.5i 0'96 E'L6 L•LL L'96 L'9i =Tan mioJTUII 9-'0 9••D L9'0 LD'0 L9'0 TT'0 TO'0 LL'0 i6'0 6C'0 L9'0 29'0 +dtU/amnioA 9'D9 9'09 i'Lf 5'66 S'-6 E'SI 0'OI 0'OT 0'OT S'E6 I'LS L'CT +amFZ nNxp 1.•r =sanow 7TaJ SL'0 SL'0 65.0 f0'0 SL•0 t0'0 00'0 t0'0 60'0 Ot'0 LD•D LO'0 =305/TOA • +sinpoy( staRiavY ~i7Wadao i---------------~ ~---------------t i---------------j i--------------- ~------------ OEf 69EE OStf O91T 005E OSLS 05LI 006T OSLT OSTL SOf 866T ='708 TaaF3 6t'0 Z8'T 00't 00't 00't 00'T 00'L 00'L 00'T 00 Y LL'0 C9'0 +saaa'I 56'0 66.0 £8'0 L6'D 00'T Lfi•0 Z6.0 00'T L6'0 EB•0 S6.0 56'0 +7vam7air~pY OO6I 006T 006E OOfiT 006T 006E OA6T 006t 006E 006T OOQS 006E =anal/708 rainpal noia Ootaemiag f8 056 ES5 LS 966 9L L tt OL LO£ T2 TOL +'LOA i4QTd OD'T DO'[ 00'L 00't 00'T 00'L 00'L 00't 00'L DO'T 00't 00"L +FpY d'DI 00't 00'L 00'L 00'L DO'I 00'2 00'L 00'T 00'L 09'T 00'T 00'L +FPY fDd f6 056 E5S L5 9i6 9L L TL OL LOE LL TOT +iOA PaonPax 5 0 0 6fi 0 0 -Et 0 0 LLC 0 0 +ToA a~upatl T6 058 Es4 TSL 966 9L ST LL OL BiS LC tOt +amatOA dgd L6'0 L6'0 L6'0 Lb'0 Z6.0 L6'0 Z6'0 Z6'0 L6'0 L6'0 L6'0 G6'0 =FPY dttd 00'2 00'T DO'T• 00'L OD'T 00'T 00't DO't 00't 00'2 00'i 00'T =I:PY aaat( -8 LBL 605 6EL OLB iZ iT 6I -9 LL6 6T E6 +iTtd T6TiTVI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D D D o +iaUSgssasea 0 OS o 0 L 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 +ToA DaPPY is LLL 605 bEi 098 6L it 6t i9 LL> 6L E6 =v6: tstiFuI 00't 00•T DO'T 00'L OD'T 00't 00'L 00•t 00'T 00'i DO'i 00'T =~pY giKOxD i8 LLL 605 6Et 999 6Z iL 6t i9 LLi 6t F6 =ToA a5% 'aTnpow aostTon 0 T t 0 L T• O L 0 T T 0 L 0 T L 0 0 L 0 =aalte7 OT OS [ OT DT L Ot 0T t OT DT L +aaaxp 'aTw apnTOVI spniaai apoTDal Lao =sag6ty pa7oaaoxd pai~aioxd saegd att4s asagd 7FTdg +LOa7vO0 ---------------II~-......-______~~_-_-._-_____.--~j-__--_-_____~..~.-_-_.--____ 8 - i - K ll J. Z Y- S- Z 1[ - 1- Z r attatlgnON pence aaaw punoa 7saa PLD+Og 40[100 pupae Y3aa3 'r gosoxddY a1r••1•Ir•1•r••••a\M\1••••11•••+\•I•rrrlflt••••Irrlt•r•••it •r•••••r•r••••••••r11 0 raoTnxaB i0 pna•I f5 +aiO~C7 Tau+Fidp E'Lt r(gan/oaa) .LeiaO agaxaAY (aas o•6rM+b) Lt =loos) a~nFa sroq 669'0 =(X)'daJ/'LOA T6OTaFX7 OTT +(oasl •i~ +rw•~•••f •••t•wrr•trr••••r••••••••.•1••••w•w••o1••ffrrrw••rr••f•••••.rw••. • pU QQRH 9 +(aa~ avanaa5 ttl troLaoassa7ttl •tr1••r•\•••I r•••Y•rrlr•1111\\••••r•••rr••••NI••t11ff•••••1•rrr•rr•rt•r1••••••• (annavxo7'Err amnioA aanas>;) POgiaH cnoiaaxadp YDH Oooz aaodag uoFinndwoj aatasas so iana1 i-L DBad 6t+F6+ST LODZ 'LL den n+Illid 7Oa~axa + ISY + 6at7s Fxg t-9 a8ad 6Z+6Y+ST c0ot 'LL da3 ngbtdd aoo):oxg + ISY * BaFaa FrCi Existing . ATS r rroj eet PMPhu Hsp 27, 2007 15ra4s19 page 8-1 Sxl BCing + A7I +~Projeec PMrhu Sep 77, 2007 15~44:29 Page 9-1 Level Of Service Cog~utatlon Report Leval O[ Service COO¢1UtatiOD Report 2000 HCM OperatiOna Method (FLLCUre Voltage Alte rnative) 2 000 BCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) •• a•• • a••w•+•a•a•waaf nea t....a•••••r r••aa+r••arr•a•rl aaaaw wala•f aR••aaa•••• rra•wwara •a aa•w•rr•wr aat waaff+aa•w••••a•Y•••a• raa arwwr••a•a1a••w•w•aa •ef faa afaa•!aa •a Ctlon 43 St I t rB evens Czeek i SH 85 RampB SatesseCtloa $1 Stevens Creek 6 NB 8S Ramps ' e e a ••••• r a•a+s aa••ar aa«••• •••« r+aaaa aa.r• •ar•••a•••rw ••ea•aa•rrrrarara•aara a+raraawra••a•r+a•u wa ua•aaa wa•aaaaa awraa•aa •••a••a••w•rfra••• Cye1s (sec): «• awra••arw••aa.a•r•aa w 110 Critical vol ./Cap. (x): 0.874 Cycle Isec): 11o Critical Yol./Cap. (x)t 0.808 Loss Time (sect= 12 (Y.R• 4.D see) Avarege Delay Isec /veh)a 38.3 Loas Time IsecT= 17 IY+R~4.0 sec) Average Delay (tut/vehlr 38.4 i cle l C O 103 Level Oi Service= n+ Optimal eycie e as Level Of Servieee D+ s ma pt y w. a••••••waraaaaa • rwr+•• rr ••e•••w.. arr•af•..•• •••rr ••aa• ••a•a••rrrrrwaw•f •••wr r+•+r•a«a••u aawrrr•ra •r•a•a .•••aa•••fwr •raa •rrw••e•+••a•aw•••••w••a•ra•• Approncbr North Bound a r• w South Hound Scat Inured NeaC Hotmd Appzoachs North Hound South HouaB Sast Hound Nest Hound Movetnerete L- T- R L- T - A L- ? - R L- T- A Movemener L T A G T R L T R L -- T -___- R _---_ -I--_..__- -II Contzols Protected - .. ..II Protected - .--SI Protected - ---I Protected --I Control, - li Split Phase ---- - Spl -----._.. -l it Phase .--_-___---- l- Protected Protected Righter Include Include Include Include Rights Include irlcluds ireelude ignore Oreere; 7 Min 10 10 7 30 10 7 30 10 7 1D 30 Min. Greene 7 LD 10 7 30 30 7 30 10 7 1D 10 . 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 7 0 7 0 0 Lenest 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 3 2 9 3 0 0 D 0 3 0 1 Lanlst - -----.- I ------------ I --------------- I I ----- ---_-.---- I I -------°-- ---- I I .... ..--.. -.--- l .-------.-.-I ----- Valwtle lbdulee -- -- ------I I ------_-------_ I I '---- ----_- --_- I I -..-. 4 _ _ 73 0 volume ladulet Baae Vol: 84 783 0 258 1 530 481 1904 0 0 834 949 ease Vole 0 0 0 1205 6 751 00 1 00 1 00 0 1 ao 1036 1 00 173 1 po a! pD 1 9 00 L oo 1 orowth edit ].o0 1.0o S.oo S.oo 1.ao l.oo l.o0 1.oD 1.ao 1.aD S.oo l.oD ccoNth Adjt 1.oD ].o0 1.Dp 1. . . 6 75] . 0 . 1036 . 173 . 444 . . 739 0 Initial Bee: 54 283 0 258 1 530 491 1909 0 0 939 949 , D1ltlal Bees 0 0 0 ' 1705 0~ 0 1 0 2 0 61 iD 0 Added vole 0 0 15 0 D 0 0 22 0 0 71 81 ~- Added vole 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 Passer5yVO1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0• 0 0 0 0 passerSyvolr 0 Initial Futt 0 0 0 0 0 0 1215 8 751 0 1038 173 SOS 749 0 Initial ltrt: 54 183 1S 268 1 530 491 1931 0 0 SODS 1030 , User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 7.00 3.00 1.00 Veer Adjs 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,. D0 0.00 F10' Adje 0.91 0.92 0.9? 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.92 0-97 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 PRP' Mjt 0.97 0.92 0.91 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.00 P1D= Vollagar O 0 0 1331 7 816 0 1128 188 599 814 0 PFSP volume= 59 306 16 280 1 576 534 2099 0 0 1091 0 Redact Volt 0 0 0 0 0 3D 0 0 157 0 0 0 Reduet Vole 0 0 0 0 0 279 0 0 -0 O 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 1332 7 786 0 3128 36 949 814 0 Reduced vela 59 308 16 180 1 797 534 2099 0 0 1092 0 PCB Adjc 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PCS Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 p.DD MLF Adje 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 MLF Mjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00. L.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Sisal Yol.: 0 0 0 1332 7 7B6 0 1178 36 549 814 D ( Final V01.: - --I 58 308 16 ---------------II 780 ----- 1 197 ----------I 534 2099 I---------- 0 il 0 ---- 1092 ----- 0 -•---- i ll Saturation FSON Modules ---------------I I----- ----- -I i...- ------ Saturation F1oN Module: Sat/Lance 1900 1900 1900 190E 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 L900 1900 1900 Sat/Lanes 1900 1900 1900 1100 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0 0 92 Mju9tmmt: 95 0.95 0 95 0 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.83 1.00 0.91 4.92 1.00 0.97 ' Adjustment, 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.67 0.95 0.91 " 0.91 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.0 . eases, . . 0 31 1 63 O OB . 65 0 0.01 1.34 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 3.00 Lanesr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 3.00 2.99 0.00 3.87 0.13 2.00 1.00 0.00 r Final SaC . . . 352 7894 183 . ]141 4 2354 3150 5700 0 0 4700 3750 Final 3at.a 0 0 0 4978 24 1750 0 7767 231 3340 3000 0 I . I -. II --_-- .-_-- -- I II capacity Analysis Module, ----. .-----I I---- _ l l---- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sate 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.77 0.45 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.21 0.00 vol/Sate 0.11 0.11 0.11 O.a5 0.25 0.13 0.17 0.37 •a•r 0.00 0.00 a•r• 0.19 0.00 Crit MOVlBr Careen Teener 0.0 0.0 0.0 •••• 56.5 56.5 56.5 D.0 ar.r. 19.5 19.5 aw•. 11.9 41.5 0.9 CrSC Movesx Green Times •rra 14.5 14.5 14.8 r•aa 33.4 33.4 33.1 17.9 b0.a 0.~0 0.0 16.6 0.0 Volume/Cape 0.00 0.00 0.00 D. 53 0.53 0.81 0.00 0.87 O.a7 0.87 0.57 0.00 Volume/Caps 0.83 O.BI 0.81. 0.81 0..81 0.42 0.79 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.00 Vnitom Dels 0.0 O.0 0.0 17.8 17.8 13.6 0.0 44.0 44.0 42.7 27.1 ~0.0 tAliform Dsl: 46.4 46.9 46.4 35-3 33.7 30.5 40.9 25.8 9.0 0.0 39.1 0.0 SacreaatDeis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 11.5 0.0 8.2 8.2 iS.B 1.6 o.D incremntDel: 13.8 13.8 13.8 9.6 9.6 0.9 9.3 2.8 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.0 InitQUeuoal= 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 InltQueunsis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 O.0 Delay Adjc 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delsy Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 D.DD 1.00 0.00 DelayNehc D.0 0.0' 0.0 18.6 18.6 35.1 0.0 57:1 51.7 58-D 78.8 0.0 Delay/Yehr 60.3 60.3 6p.3 44.9 44.9 31.4 50.2 28.6 0.0 0.0 43.9 0.0 veer D.1Adj= 1.00 l.o0 1.00 l.oa 1.DD 1.ao l.oD l.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o veer DelAdja S.oa S.oo l.o0 1-00 1.DD l.o0 1.00 l.oo i.oo 1.00 l.DO a.Da AdjDel/Vehe 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.6 18.6 35.3 0.0 52.1 51.2 58.3 28-8 0.0 AdjDel/Vehs 60.3 60.3 6b.1 44.9 44.9 •31.4 60.2 28.6 0.0 0.0 43.9 0.0 LOS by Mover A A A H- B- D+ A D- D- S+ C 2.03 by Move, S S 5 D D C D C A A D A RC742kAvgps 0 0 0 11 11 28 0 13 13 34 11 0 RQ42kAVgQt 9 9 4 aww•r•••••r 17 r•s wwe 17 7 ra•a••..wa• 11 22 •wan.wa.awr• 0 aaaaaa 0 »ww 13 •wwr• 0 rawwre• ••are•as•ar•awe•••rw••wawaaw•••aa•afa+wane.u r•a•a a•aar•••r••w •••aaa•w••waara•a •• • ••rr• • •w• rr Nots: Queue rsporeed is the number of cars per Sane . Queue reported is the number lroces of cars per lane. TrafEix 7.8.0715 IC) 2008 Dotrllag Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF CUFBRTINO Tsattix 7.8.0715 (c) 1006 DOVi1og Assoc. Licensed to CITY of CVPSATINO N V V N V OD Axisting + A?i + Prof eat PMIhu Sap 27, 2007 15=94=29 Page SO-1 Levei Of servitt Cbrtputation neport 7000 RCM Opnracions Method IFUture Volume A1teYnativel ••••••a••••aa+r aar•••••••a.a•a••aa••••a aaaa••aaa.rw•••r••ww••waa•~aaa•arra Inter9ection 115 Stevens Creek 4 Scsll iag RQ aaaa••wa•.a••a••••aar•••rr.••arar•••a•.•+aaaa•w•••ar•rr•a•w•.••a••••+r..wua•a• Cycle fsee)s - 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(%Is 0-910 tons. 73ae (set)s 12 (Y+R~4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/vah)r 57.3 Optimal Cyeis, 12d Level OE Servicsa S+ aaa Ha•••wH awwH HHaaa•Ha'a w•r•M a•••rw•aara•M MaH••aa •••w•a.••wara•• •wq •a•• ApproaWe Morth bound south Srnmd Bast Bawd Nast Hound MovecNnts L- S- R L- T - R L - T- A L- T- A Control= Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights Include Include Include Include Min. Green= 7 10 20 7 10 SD 7 10 10 7 30 10 Lanes a 1 0 2 0 1 1 O 2 0 1 1 0 2' 1 0 2 0 3 0 1 Volume Module= Haas VOls 331 398 Growth Adj. 1.00 1.00 Initial Haas 331 396 Added Vol: 1 0 PasserHyvol: 0 0 initial Futr 332 396 Veer Adys 1-00 1-00 P8P Adyr 0.93 0.92 FRP VOl1d0a: 3fi1 430 Redact VOla D O Reduced VOlr 361 430 Pcs Adj: l.DO 1.00 MLF Adi= i.oo S.oo Final VOl.r 361 430 41< 1.00 414 a 0 414 1.00 0.92 450 337 113 1.00 l.oo 113 783 547 1.00 1.00 383 947 0 0 0 0 I83 547 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 a16 588 0 0 416 593 l.o0 1.00 l.oo l.oo 416 598 273 268 913 218 678 1282 352 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 273 368 923 218 678 1281 352 3 14 30 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 276 282 993 374 675 1289 352 1.00 l.oo l.o0 1.oa l.o0 1-oD 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.92 0.91 0.93 300 107 1036 243 737 1a01 274 237 0 0 3a 0 0 179 fi3 307 1036 210 737 1401 95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.o0 1.DO 1•.ao l.oa 1.0a l.oa l.oa b3 307 1038 310 737 1401 99 8aturaeian Flaw Module= Sat/Latte: 1900 1900 1700 1700 1900 AdjuaCmeatr 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 2.00 Lancer l.o0 2.ao l.DO l.oo s.oo Pinal Set.r 1750 7800 17$0 1750 3600 ---- •---- -I-----• ------II- -------' Capacity Analysis Modules Vol/Satr 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.24 0.18 CYit MoveBS aaa• aa•w firem Tisse= 17.3 15.4 18.4 32.4 20.6 Volume/Caps 0.91 0.86 0.50 0.86 0.91 Wltorm Dllr 43.2 51.4 46.7 42.0 48.8 InCra0ocDels 17.4 19.9 7.8 20.E 19.0 3DLCQuluDelr 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Dn1ay Adj. l.oo l.oo l.oo a.oo 1.00 Delay/Vlh: 71.8 71.3 56.5 61.4 87.9 veer DalAdjs 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 AQjDel/vehr 72.8 7I.7 56.5 f2.4 87.8 LOS by Moves 8 8 B+ 8 8 RCM1k11vgQs 18 11 s a9 14 ......«.a ...............a........a....., Notes Queue reported is Clae masloez of u 1900 1900 1900 3900 1900 1900 1900 0.92 0-92 0.99 0.95, 0:83 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 2.47 0.53 2.00 3.00 1.00 1750 1750 4653 945 3150 5700 1750 ..._--11------------•--II--------------- 0.04 0.18 0.21 0.27 0.23 0.35 0.05 aaaa ••aw 20.6 28.0 29.3 29.3 30.9 39.1 35.1 0.21 0.84 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.84 0.19 42.7 4B.S 44.0 44.0 43.2 39.8 31.7 1.6 20.1 30.8 10.6 16.1 5.2 0.8 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o D.o a.o 1.00 1.00 i.oo l.ao S.oo l.oo l.oo 44.3 65.7 54.6 54.6 59.4 15.0 32.5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 44.3 68-7 54.6 54.6 b9.4 45.0 32.5 D S D- D- E+ D 2 14 19 19 20 18 1 ,1a•••a•aa•aaaawarr Nww•a•+r•aaaa••ara•• ire per Sane. ' aYaffix 7.8.0719 (c) 1006 Darling Assoc. Licensed t0 CI?Y OF CUPBRTIN0 8xisting + ATI + PYOyect PMThu Sep 27, 2007 15.44=29 Page 11-1 Level 0E Service Canputation RepOYt 2000 RCM Operations Method (Future volume Alternative) •aaaa•aaaa•.••ww•aaaawwwr•Sawwr•••••••••aa••aarr••waaw••a+rawwaraaw•w•••a«••aar Intersection eb Stevens Creek s SAICR •••ar•a••a•aw•wwww••aa•Naw.•rwr•aawa•••••.•••a•araraaaaa••rarrarw.•aaawaw•wa•• Cycle Iseclr 110 Critical Vol./Cap.(XJr 0.545 igaa Tama fact). 9 (Y+R.4.0 sac) Average Aeiay (sec/veh)s 14.8 Optimal Cycler 37 Level Of Service= S a•erraa•••••••s•w•a••r••a•it•••w••awwa•a••r•a•f•r•r••r•www aaar•a•••r••••r••wa Na Approarh= North Hound south 3ouad Baet Bormd Neat Hotrod Movement. L- T - A L- T- R L- T- R L- T - R Cantrolr Permitted PratvcteQ Protected Permitted Rights: Include include Include Include Mia. Greens 7 10 1D 7 iD 10 7 10 10 7 SO SO Lanes: 0 0 0 0 o i 0 3 o i 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 a Volume Module= Hasa Vols 0 0 0 96 0 187 337 1993 0 D 141$ 60 Orowth Adjr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Aee: 0 0 0 96 0 181 337 1993 D o 1915 60 Added Vola 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 30 0 0 7 0 PaaserByvolr o 0 0 0 0 o D o D o 0 0 IiltCial Tuts 0 0 0 98 0 187 337 2023 0 D 1922 80 Veer Adj= 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 PHF~Adjr 0-97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ,0.92 0.92 0.92 0-92 FHP Volvnier 0 0 0 104 0 103 266 2199 0 0'1546 6$ Redact Yolr 0 0 0 0 0 168 0 0 0 O 0 /0 nedUCad Volr 0 0 0 104 0 15 368 1199 0 0 1546 25 F(~ Adir l.o0 1.00 1.00 l.oo S.oo 1.oa l.oo l.o0 1.00 l.o0 1.00 1.oD MLF Adjr 2.00 l.oo S.oa l.oa s.oo l.oo S.oo S.oD 1.00 l.oa 1.00 l.oo Final vol-: 0 0 0 104 0 35 366 2199 0 0 Sb46 25 Saturation Floe Modules ' Sat/Lens: 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1909 1900 I900 1900 1900 Mjuate»ate 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.93 Laaess 0.00 0.00 O.OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 1900 1750 1750 5700 0 0 5700 1750 ------------I---------------II-----'---------II-----.._..-----II---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sots O.CO 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.02 0.21 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.01 Crit hbVEfs • aaaa wa•• ' GYaen rim.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 i1.2 0.0 11.2 39.1 69.8 0.0 0.0 50.7 60.7 Volume/Cap: 0.00 o.oD 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.30 0.99 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.03 tmilarm Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.2 0.0 45.3 28.9 7.0 ~0.0 0.0 21.9 1i.2 SaereaatDel, 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.5 0.0 1.5 4.0 O.l 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.1 InitQuetODele 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Aajr o.oo o.oo o.oo l.oo o-oD 1.00 i.oo i.oD o.oo o_oo l.o0 1.00 Delayrveha o.a o.o o.o so.7 'o.0 47.e 32.9 3.4 o.D a.o 21.9 16.3 Deer DaiAdje 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RQjDel/Vehs 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.7 0.0 47-8 32.9 3.4 0.0 0.0 22.9 16.3 LOS by Moves A A A B A D C- A A A C+ 8 8CM21wvgQ: ' v a o 5 0 1~ la a o o la o ••raawR••••••aRr•••/raaa•aw••aa••••aallwaa/aa•fa•a •••aa1•allaaaaa•a/raaaaaa••••a Rotes Queue reported is the number of cars per ].ans. TraEfix 7.8.0715 (cl 2006 Dowling Aeex. Licensed to CIYy OP CUPBRTINO EXisting + ATT + Project PriThO Sep 27. 2007 15.,44:29 Page 12.1 Leval O! Service Computation RapOrt 2000 ACM operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) •aa•f•af•11ra1f•aa•!a•i.aaff•r..a•••f.a•f.ra•aa•a•a•af •f .aafa•••aaawaafa aie•••.f Intersection 87 Stevens Creek i Brandley ff•f••awaaV+va••self.a•fa•r.r•V1ff•.Iraafr•.4aaaaa#ff as af•f alr•tff a•afa..aaraaaa• Cccle (set)s 1I0 Critical vo3.. /Cap.IX)e O.B64 :.Die Time (elelr i2 (Y+A-4.0 sec) Average Delay IaeC/veh7: 33.0 Optimal Cyeies 99 Lwel" Of Services C- •af alas..a•aa•aaafaaaaaafaa•a•a}ff..aaffaf.r.f.lfaaaaa•alra•f ffla•a rffa••laaaaa• Approach= North awed South sound Bast Aouad w@st Bound Mbvertrat r L- T- A L- T - A L- T- A L - T - A __-.-....---I_______________II---_-.--_--_..-II.--_-__-__-____II_______________i Control. Permitted Permitted PrOteeeed PratecCSd Righter inclusl@ Include include Include win. Greens 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 30 Lanes= 0 1 0 D 1 O 1 0 D 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 -------...--I-----•--------•It---------------II---------------II---------------1 Volume Modules ease Yol= 70 16 40 7B9 15 112 443 1580 53 103 1507 107 Groweh Adj= l.oo i.ao I.oo l.oa i.oo l.o0 1.00 l.oo l.DO 1.DO l.DO 1.00 Initial Bses 70 16 a0 289 16 11P 443 1580 53 105 1507 107 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 7 0 PasserByVOls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 Initial P1its 70 16 40 2B9 16 ~ 112 443 1610 53 lOS 1514 107 VBtr Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 PAF Mjs 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 PAF Volume: 76 17 42 3i4 17 322 482 1750 58 314 1616 216 Aeauee vDla o 0 2s D D 81 o a 7 0 0 24 Aeducad Vols 76 17 18 334 17 41 482 1750 51 114 1846 92 Pte Adje I.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo i.oo i.oo l.o0 1.00 l.ov 1_oD l.oo t4LP Adjr l.DO l.oo l.oo l.oD l.oD 1_0o i.oo l.oo L.oo l.oD l.o0 1.00 Final VDl.s 76 17 18 314 17 41 4B2 1730 51 114 1646 92 --._.-...---I---------------II---------------II-----•.--------II-...---_..-----I Seturatiw Slow Modules fiat/Laaea 1900 1900 1800 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 3900 3900 1900 AdjusCmeats 0.95 0.9$ 0.91 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.91 1.00 0.92 0.93 0.98 0.95 Lsnee: 0.81 0.19 1.00 0.95 0.03 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.OU 1.00 2-B3 0.17 Final 9at.+ 3465 335 1750 1706• 94 I75D 1750 5700 1750 3150 5302 297 Capacity Analysis Modules Voi/BaCr 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.18 O.ia 0.02 O.7B 0.31 0.03 0.07 0.31 0.31 Crit MOVees •a•• eras •aaa Groan Times 23.4 23.4 23.4 23.4 23.4 23.4 35.0 61.5 53.5 13.1 39.3 39.5 Yoluae/Caps 0.74 0.24 0.0E 0.86 0.86 0.13 0.96 0.55 0.05 0.55 0.36 O.B6 VaiEOrm Dels 35.9 35.9 34.4 41.7 41.7 34.9 35.2 15.4 11.0 45.7 32.7 32.7 IncrdsntDel: 1.5 1.9 0.3 11.9 21.9 0.6 16.2 0.7 0.1 10.1 5.2 4.2 T[1iCt!ueuDSls 0.0 0.~0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adje 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 S.Ob 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 Delay/Vehs 37.4 37.! 34.7 63.7 63.7 35.5 51.5 Y6.1 11-1 55.8 38.0 38.0 Vser DelAdjs 1.00 2.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD MjDel/vehs 37.4 37.4 34.7 63.7 63.7 35.5 51.3 I6.1 11.1 65.6 30.0 38.0 7.OS by )bva s Dr D+ C- e S D+ D- S B+ B+ D+ SCM7kAVgQt 3 3 1 14 14 1 19 13 1 S 21 21 Motet Queue reported is the number of care peY lava. Traf1!ix 7.8.0715 (cl 2006 OOwiittg ASSOC. ia.censad to CITY OP CUPSRTIND N J (O Bxlating • ATI + Project PMThu Sep 27, 20 D7 15s44e29 Page 13-1 Level OE service CDasputacion Report 3000 SC34 Operations Method (Future Volume Al ternativ@) a.•a•••••••faaaaaa.f••.,.•f faaa•fa«•••a•raf•ff•f•f•aa•aaaf erfaraa wf•r•..a•••faa Intersection OB stalling i Greenl enE Cycle (sec3s 60 Critical vol./Cap. (X): 0.808 I.DBS Time (Sec): 12 (Y+R`4.0 sec) Average Delay Isec/veh)r 14.8 Optimal Cycles 73 Level OE Servi ter a •1f•1f.••aaarf lfffalafara af•1f af.1••11 aaa•f•wwf arfaafalaa+aaf laaa••1ra•f aar••4aI Approachs Nortb sound South sound Seat Bound west sound )4ovemante L- T •• R L- 7- R L- T - R L- T - A ..._-..-----I_______________II_-_______--_.._II-_-__-_________II_______________I Controls ~ Pezmitted .Parau.tted Permitted pczsaittad Rights Include Include include Include win. Gremr 7 iD SO ~7 10 30 7 10 30 7 10 30 Lanesr 0 0 11 0 O 0 0 if 0 D 0 0 it 0 0 D 0 It 0 0 volume Mspdulee Base Vole 16 647 12 21 968 3S 55 11 2S 24 21 24 Gxowth Mjs l.oo i.oo i.oo 1.00 l.oo l.DO l.oD i.oo l.ao l.o0 1.oD i.oo Initial Haes 16 657 i2 21 968 35 55 11 ~ 75 74 21 24 Added Vol s 0 14 a 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Piaserl4yVOls 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 Initial Ptiits 16 671 12 71 971 35 55 11 2S 24 21 24 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.b0 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 PTI?' Adjs 0.93 0.9] 0.82 0.97 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.97 p)ff Volume, 17 729 13 23 1055 38 60 12 77 26 23 26 Redact Vole 0 0 1 0 0 2 0~ 0 12 0 0 20 Reduced vols 37 729 17 a3 loss 36 60 12 15 2s 23 6 PCB Adjr. 1.00 l.DO S.oD l.oo l.ao l.oo l.oo l.o0 1.00 1.DO 1.00 1.oa (4LP Adjr S.oo i.ao l.oo S.oo 1.ao l.oo l.o0 1.DO 1.00 l.o0 1-00 l.oo Final VO1.s 17 729 12 23 3055 36 60 17 13 26 ~23 6 -------.-_--1---------------II'---____-..._-_ll----__----_----11-------__---_--I Saturation slow Modules Sat/Lease 1900 1990 •1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 AdjusCmene: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 Laaess 0.02 0.96 0.02 0.92 0.95 0.03 0.69 0.14 0.17 0.47 0.42 0.11 Final Sat.: 40 1682 2a 36 1658 s7 1204 741 306 830 726 194 -_----'-----1---------------fl-....----------11.....----------Il-------------.-I Capacity Analysis Modular Yol/bat. 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 Cr1t t40vess a•af ~ ..fr Groan Times 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 30.0 10.0 10.0 10-0 10.0 10.0 volsmse/Cape 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.88 O.BB 0.88 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.25 0.25 0.73 DniEOrm Delr 3.3 S.3 4.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 33.2 32.2 32.2 32.6 31.6 31.6 3ncze0ntD@1s 2.1 2.1 2.1 8.8 8.8 6.8 S.3 $.3 4.3 2.7 2.7 7.7 InltOuenDels 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 nelay Aaje 1.00 l.o0 1.00 l.o0 1.00 1.oa l.o0 1.00 l.oo l.oD i.oD 1.00 Delay/vahs 7.a 7.< 7.4 17.1 17.1 17.1 37-b 37.5 37.5 34:4 34.4 34.4 Vser DelAdj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Vehs 7.4 7.4 7.4 17.1 17-1 17.3 37.5 37.5 37.5 34.4 34.4 34.4 LOS try Move: A A A B H D D+ D. Dr C- C- NCM2kAvgOs 30 10 10 26 36 76 3 3 3 2 2 2 a.f rrrfraf•.•raaa af.•a•f aarar•rra.af rraa... afrraa. aaaa•.raf.rrraaf•afaseaaaHaaf Note. Queue reported is Che ausxber of cars per iane. TretEix 7.8.0715 Ic) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed W CITY OP CVPSRTINO IDclsting + ATI + PYOD eCt PM1')lU Sep 27, 2007 15s44r79 Page 14-1 Level Ot Service COaputation Report 2000 HQ4 Operations McWod (FUtUYS volume Alternative) •f awwwr•ww•w•wr•rrer••«aar••••«•••••••r••r•w••••••a•rrr••rrw«••waaa •rw••••.••a Interaeccion ff Stslling i McClellan ••r«r••r•rr••a•wa•awira•••••••a•rrer•••r••••wr•••••••ra.•••w««•rw «www•rrr+•••ara Cye1e (sac)s. 100 Criti0al Vol./Cap. (X), 0.618 Lflss Time (elclr 12 (Y+R-4.0 sac) AVessye Delay (sea/veh)a 45.7 Optims2 Cyalss 81 Level Ot Services D •L••••r•rraar•w••••w•!•••w••f•ff•ww•LN•wf••waarrw••••rw «a•M •r•r•••••aa •wwwr••• Approach: North found South Hasnd Saet sound Nest Hound Movement! L- T- R L- T - R L- T - R L- 'T - R -..-.--_-___I_______________I~----.--.•---._.~I-_______-____--~~__.-.._.--__...~ Contmi! Proceetad protected Protected Pzoteetad Aigbtsa Ineinds include Include ~ Include Min. Greexts 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 SO 7 10 10 IAnlss 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 D 1 0 1 Volume Mod0lei Bass Vols 128 389 72 330 626 1B3 174 416 129 133 3e0 154 Growth Adjr 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.90 I.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bier 126 369 72 330 626 183 174 418 129 133 3B0 •154 Added Vela 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasaerByvolr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Initial Putt 128 270 72 330 637 183 174 416 129 173 380 154 'user Adis l.o0 1.00 l.oo i.DO l.DO 1.oD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.DO 1.00 PdF Adj+ 0.92 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.97 0:92 0.92 PRP Volumes i39 402 78 359 667 199 18! 454 140 145 433 167 RadOet Volr 0 0 SO 0 0 10 0 0 76 0 0 137 R4idttced VO1r 139 407 2b 359 687 189 1B9 454 114 148 413 35 PCS Adjr 1.00 S.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 M13' Adje 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 Final VO1.s 13! 402 36 359 687 1B9 189 484 114 i45 413 3f Saturation Flow Modules Bat/Land 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900'1900 1900 1900 1900 1400 Adjustsnpt: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanear 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.56 0.44 1.00 0.60 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 9iaa1 9at.s 1750 3457 243 17f0 2901 79B 1750 1438 362 1760 1900 1750 --_--_______~-..-._-__-•-____(~••__-----_•___-~~-._...______•__~~-__••__------...I Capacity Analysis Module. Vol/Bets 0.08 D.12 0.12 0.70 0.21 0.24 0.11 0.37 0.32 0.06 0.22 0.07 LYit Movest •a •f .•.« s w••w Omen Tiros: 9.9 34.7 14.2 28.I 29.4 29.4 16.2 38.6 36.6 10.1 32.5 37.6 Volume/Cape 0.61 0.82 o.aa 0.82 0.81 .0.81 0.67 0.62 0.82 D.62 0.87 0.06 laiil0l7a Dela 44.1 41.6 41.6 35.3 32.6 32.6 39.4 27.5 27.5 44.0 2f.1 23.2 IncrertntDels 31.6 i3.7 13.2 15.5 6.4 d.4 11.9 10.3 10.3 37.7 6.6 0.2 InitClueuDelr 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O. D~ D.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adjs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 Delay/veh- 75.7 54:9 64.9 50.6 39.0 39.0 51.7 37.9 37.9 76.8 34.7 13.4 acct DelAdjr i.oo 1.0o Loo i.oo 1.oD 1.ao 1:00 1.00 1.00 l.oo i.DO 1.oD AdjDel/Vehe 75-7 54.9 54_9 80.8 39.0 39.0 51.2 37.9 37.9 76.6 34.7 23.4 tA9 by Mpver F- D- D• D D D D- D+ D+ &- C- Rg42kAVyQs 7 9 9 14 15 19 7 19 19 7 12 1 •«•.•r•••••w••••••w•a••u rrr••••r••••••ww•••arLrrrw..w•w•wr«.•r+••«•r••«r•wrw• NOCer quaae reported is the member oL cars per lase. Tzaf[ix 7.6.0715 Ic) 2006 Dowling Assoc. ldcensed to CI1Y O! CUPRRTINO N V v O .. EXHIBIT B ARBOR RESOURCES Professional Arboriculta~r-al Consulting & Tree Care A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT THE OAKS SHOPPING CENTER 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA APPLICANT• Karen Ngo, Sand Hiil Properties Company APN: 326-27-035 Submitted to: Colin Jung Community Development Department City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #399 ISA Certified Arborist #WE-4001A July 24, 2007 1'.O, Box 25295, San Mateo, California 94402 + Email: arborresources@comcast.net Phone: 650.654.3351. ~ Fax: 650.240.0777 • Licensed Contractor #796763 27-171 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting,4rborist July 24, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 1 2.0 TREE COUNT AND COMPOSITION ..................................1 3.0 SUITABILITY FOR TREE PRESERVATION ....................... 3 4.0 TREES ALONG WESTERN BOUNDARY ............................ 4 5.0 REVIEW OF TREE IMPACTS ........................................... 4 5.1 Proposed Tree Removals .............................................. 4 5.2 Trees at Potential Risk of Severe Impacts ............. ............... 5 6.0 .RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................... 6 6.1 Design Guidelines .......................................................6 6.2 Protection Measures Before and During Construction ............ 8 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT TITLE A TREE WVENTORY TABLE B SITE MAP i 27 - ~ 72 David L. Bobby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 24, 2007 1.0 INTRODUCTION I have been .retained by the City of Cupertino Community Development Department to review the following items associated with a proposal for development of the Oaks Shopping Center located at 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino: [1] the demolition of buildings housing a theater, security office and Royal Tofu House, and [2] construction of a new hotel and mixed-use building over a parking podium. Tasks performed for this review are as follows: ^ Identify all trees on-site. ^ Estimate their trunk diameters at approximately 54 inches above grade or as appropriate to obtain the most representative sample of trunk size. ^ Distinguish between "protected trees" versus not-protected trees ({pursuant to Section 14.18.035(B) of Cupertino's Municipal Code}). ^ Estimate canopy spread and ascertain the trees' health and.structural integrity. ^ Determine the trees' suitability for preservation (e.g. high, moderate or low). ^ Review the two site plans, Sheets DR-2 and DR-3, by ARC Inc. Architects, dated 5/30/07. ^ Assign numbers to each tree and plot these numbers on the map presented in Exhibit B (this map is a copy of Sheet DR-3, Preliminary Site Plan B). Tags were found attached to the trunks of nearly half the inventoried trees; when one was found, I note it within the second column of the table in Exhibit A. ^ Prepare a written report containing the aforementioned information, and provide measures to help avoid or mitigate anticipated impacts. 2.0 TREE COUNT AND COMPOSITION There are 119 trees of 16 various species inventoried for this report. They are sequentially numbered from 1 thru 119, and the table on the following page identifies their name, number and percentage. Specific data recorded for each tree can be viewed in Exhibit A {Tree Inventory Table). 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 1 of l t 27 - 173 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 24, 2007 - ~` ~ ,s., [ c~ . .` .5, Il t ~ ~~{~'SC. t S t g''"""~,--~ ~~"'`aa ~ ,, ,~`}y L;;:~:ci.:s :c~x~ ti.r".4~y-.'~'L^L~~`."~ ~YS ~~i~y`~,~W ~ 1.1 ~ .6]• .~~t S~ ' ~ ~' ~ cc 1^5~..~.i'~C~~tE~- .l» 'r• ~ a •sy~ysy~,tVy'~L y~~ai ~ ~~iWl?~`~~'1 .. ~G `ti -. 1 f .~: ' __~~` J "Fe .. ;., ~-~:~,°~'R>wE N)ulrillB;~C~ ~ ~~ -0 TY `:~Q~1+1~ y V . _~~-1~``£;° _ 20, 22, 23, 26, 28, 29, 51, 52, 27 23% Ash 57-66, 73-78, 95, 107, 108 Chinese Pistache 79-92, 96-101, 116-119 24 20% Coast Live Oak 2-14, 16, 17, 39, 67, 102, 23 19% 105, 106, 13-15 Crape Myrtle 15, 18, 19, 21, 24, 25, 27, 69 8 7% )=vergreen Pear 38, 93, 94 3 3% Eucalyptus 36, 38, 41, 43, 45, 47 6 5% Flowering Pear 111, 112 2 2% Holly Oak 72 1 1 Japanese Maple 1, 103 2 2% 30-35, 37, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48- 20 17% Pine 50, 53-56, 109, 110 Pittosporum 70, 104 2 2% Tree-of-Heaven 71 1 1 Totat 119 100% As indicated above, the site is populated primarily by ash, pistache, oak and pine trees. The following 18 trees are defined as "protected trees" ({per Section 14.18.035(B) of City Code)}: #2, 3, 5-8, 10-13,17, 67,102,105,106 and 113-115. Each of these is a coast live oak with a traak diameter larger than 10 inches in diameter. There are 78 trees missing from the plans; they include #1, 4, 9, 14-33, 39, 45, 51, 53-65, 69, 71-102 and 107-112. Their approximate locations are presented on the map in Exhibit B but must not be construed as being accurate or surveyed (in several cases, they very rough estimates due to the lack of existing features shown on the plans). 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page2of11 27 - 174 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 24, 2007 3.0 SUITABILITY FOR TREE PRESERVATION Each tree has been assigned either a "high," "moderate" or "low" suitability for preservation rating as a means to cumulatively measure their physiological health, structural integrity, location, size and specie type. These ratings and applicable tree numbers are presented below; note that the "high" category is comprised of 18 trees (or 15-percent), the "moderate" category 65 trees (or 55-percent}, and the "low" category 36 trees (or 30-percent). High: These trees have a high potential of providing long-term contribution to the site, appear in good health, and contain seemingly stable structures. They can be considered the most suitable for retention and protection. ^ This rating applies to the following: #2, 4, 13-16, 1,8, 19, 21, 24, 25, 27, 39, 67, 105, 110, 114 and 115. Moderate: These trees contribute to the site but not at seemingly significant levels. Typically, their longevity and contribution is less than those of high suitability and more frequent care is needed during their remaining life span. ^ This rating applies to the following: #3, 6, 9, 10, 12, 22, 23, 32-34, 36-38, 41-43, 45-47, 49, 51-57, 59, 62, 66, 68-70, 73, 74, 79-94, 96-101, 103, 104, 106, 107 and 116-119. Low: These trees 'are predisposed to irreparable health problems and/or structural defects that are expected to worsen regardless of measures employed. In many instances, they are in a poor or declining condition. ^ This rating applies to the following: #1, 5, 7, 8, 11, 17, 20, 26, 28-31, 35, 40, 44, 48, 50, 56, 60, 61, b3-65, 71, 72, 75-78, 95, 102, 108, 109 and 111-113. 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Page 3 of II City of Cupertino Community Development Department 27 - 175 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 24, 2007 4.0 TREES ALONG WESTERN BOUNDARY Trees #33 thru 57 form a row of trees along the western property boundary and are comprised predominantly of Monterey pines, eucalyptus and shamel ash. Trees #34 thru 50 overhang the existing parking lot and are situated within one-foot (many grow against} the existing curb. Trees #51 thru 57 are grouped around and near an existing maintenance shed and trash enclosure. Of these trees, #35, 40, 44, 48 and 50 are either dead or dying and should be removed regardless of the proposed project. Though certainly not highly-valued due to their short remaining life-span and high maintenance requirements, the others trees appear worthy of retention as they seem vigorous enough to continue serving as an effective screening element between the site and Highway 85. 5.0 REVIEW OF TREE IMPACTS 5.1 Anticipated Tree Removals Based on information presented on the plans, there are 62 trees (or 52-percent of the total) that will require removal to achieve the proposed design; they include #28-51, 53- 55, 58-63, 65 and 68-95. Of these, #34, 36-39, 41-43, 45-47, 49 .and 51-55 are healthy enough to continue serving as an effective screening element between the site and highway. Consequently, their retention is recommended, and in an effort to maintain their longevity, stability and natural form 1 while allowing for construction (including the establishment of scaffolding), T recommend the fallowing minimum building setbacks are incorporated into the design: 10 feet from the trunks of trees #34, 36-39, 41-43, 45-47, 49 (essentially the row of trees along the western boundary fronting the existing parking ' Note that even at 10 feet away, canopy loss is expected for several of the pines, a situation that will create some asymmetry of their canopies; however, the loss is not anticipated to significantly diminish their form. 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 4 of 11 27 - 176 David L. Gabby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 24, 2007 lot}, and [2] 15 feet from the trunks of trees #51 thru 55. Any excavation, fill or trenching must be restricted to two feet beyond the building footprints, and the future walkway established at least five feet from the existing curb. 5.2 Trees at Potential Risk of Severe Impacts Based on information provided and my estimation of tree locations, there are approximately five additional trees at potential risk of becoming severely impacted through implementation of the proposed plans; they include #52, 56, 64, 66 and 67. Trees #52 and S6 are suggested to be retained due to their screening contribution between the site and highway. To achieve this, I recommend a 15-foot setback from their trunks for any building, excavation, fill or trenching. Tree #64 would sustain a severe amount of root loss and be subjected to instability and premature decline through implementation of the new parking Iot configuration around its trunk;. this conclusion applies to both site plan options A and B. When considering this tree's very aggressive root system and a high propensity for large limb failure, its loss would seemingly conform to the City's Municipal Code. Tree #66 may also sustain severe root toss if the existing parking island surrounding its trunk requires horizontal soil cuts. If it is intended to be retained, I recommend the existing curb configuration remains or is expanded to avoid the need for severing large roots. Also, construction of the parking lot within 15 feet of its trunk should not involve excavation below the existing asphalt surface. Tree #67 is at potential risk of root damage and losing a relatively large and significant 10- inch diameter limb growing relatively low and towards the northwest. The root damage can be seemingly mitigated through measures presented in the next section being followed. The limb may or may not conflict with a large vehicle accessing the new parking area; it certainly appears close. As the limb vitally contributes towards the tree's structural farm, I recommend the situation is studied by the applicant or their design team to ensure the limb can indeed remain (or the plan is modified to achieve this requirement). 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page S of 11 27-177 Dm~id L. Babby, Registered Consulting,4rborist July 24, 2007 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations presented within this section serve as guidelines for achieving adequate protection of trees that will be retained. They should be carefully followed and incorporated into construction plans. Please note that any or all recommendations are subject to revision upon reviewing any revised plans. 6.1 Design Guidelines 1. The location, canopy dimension,2 and vertical elevation of all trees inventoried for this report should be located by a licensed surveyor. 2. All site-related plans (e.g. site, grading and drainage, and landscape) should contain the following: the above-mentioned information; the trunk of each tree, exemplified by a circle to scale; the numbers assigned to each tree; any tag number; and the type of tree (e.g. oak, pine, ash, pistache, etc.). For trees to be removed, an "X" should be shown through their trunks. 3. Amore detailed plan showing existing and proposed conditions should also be created and supplied for review. The limit of work should also be outlined on the site plans. 4. Recommendations presented in Section 5.0 of this report shall be followed to achieve the protection of trees being retained. 5. The sections of walkway proposed beneath a tree's canopy should be established entirely on top of existing soil grade, including base materials, edging and forms (i.e. a no-dig design). Additionally, direct compaction of the existing soil surface {i.e. subgrade) must be avoided; the subbase materials can be compacted but should not exceed an 85-percent density. Soil fill can be used to sharply bevel the top of a walkway to existing grade. 2 The canopy dimensions shown for trees shown on the site plans reviewed are accurate for some, but smaller than the actual size for most. 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Page 6 of 11 City of Cupertino Community Development Department 27 - 178 David L. Ijabby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 29, 2007 6. Where beneath a tree's canopy, trenching, excavation or fill shall not occur beyond 24 inches beyond the future building foundations. In no circumstances shall soil cuts be required within sections of existing planters beneath canopies of retained trees (unless reviewed and approved by the City of Cupertino). 7. Table A •of Section 14.18.185 of the City Code should be used as the basis for determining the size and amounts of replacement trees to mitigate those approved for removal. The trees must be double-staked with rubber tree ties, and all forms of irrigation shall be of an automatic drip or soaker hose system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve. Additionally, to achieve the greatest assurance of proper installation, all new trees shall be installed, including necessary irrigation, by an experienced state-licensed landscape contractor (or a professional tree company} and performed to professional industry standards. 8. Upon availability, the following plans should be reviewed for tree-related impacts: topographic (showing the trees and information presented in items #1 and 2}; site, grading and drainage; building elevations; and landscaping. 9. This report and any supplemental letters shall be incorporated into the final set of project plans, titled Sheets T-1, T-2, etc. (Tree Protection Instructions}, and referenced on all site-related plans (i.e. site plans, grading and drainage plan, and landscape plans). 10. The permanent and temporary drainage design for the project should not require water being discharged beneath the trees' canopies. 11. The proposed landscape design should conform to the following guidelines: a. The installation of turf and plant material should be avoided beneath the oak canopies; as an alternative, Isuggest afour-inch layer of coarse wood chips. (decorative or from a tree company. b. Irrigation beneath oaks can impose adverse impacts and should be avoided. Irrigation must not strike within three feet from the trunks of all other trees. 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Page 7 of l1 City of Cupertino Community Development Department 27-179 David L. Bobby, Registered ConsuftingArborist July 24, 2007 c. Trenching for irrigation or lighting should be avoided beneath the canopies. If necessary, they should be routed in a radial direction to the trunks. d. Stones, mulch and fencing should not be placed against the trunks of existing or new trees. Plastic ground cover should also be avoided beneath canopies. e. Tilling beneath canopies should be avoided, including for weed control. f. Bender board or other edging material proposed beneath the canopies should be established on top of existing soil grade (such as by using vertical stakes). b.2 Protection Measures before and during Development 12. Due to the close proximity of activities among trees, a "project arborist"3 should be retained by the applicant or owner to assist in implementing and achieving compliance with all tree protection measures. 13. Prior to any grading, trenching or site clearing work, apre-construction meeting shall be held on-site with the contractor and project arborist to discuss work procedures, protection fencing locations, limits of grading, staging areas, .routes of access, supplemental watering, mulching, locations for equipment washing, and other tree protection measures. 14. Tree protective fencing shall be installed prior to any grading, trenching or site clearing work, and its precise location must be determined and its placement approved by the project arborist prior to the issuance of any grading or construction permit. It shall be comprised of six-foot high chain link mounted on eight-foot tall, two-inch diameter steel posts that are driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. lif installed on hardscape, the chain link fence can be supported by metal or concrete stands. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout construction until final inspection. ' The "project arborist" refers to an individual that is certified by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and/or is a member of the American Society of Consulting Arborists (ASCA). 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Page 8 of II City of Cupertino Community Development Department 27 - 180 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 24, 2007 15. Unless otherwise approved, all development activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas {even after fencing is removed) and off unpaved areas beneath the canopies of Ordinance-size trees inventoried and not inventoried for this report. These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: demolition, grading, stripping of topsoil, trenching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling/dumping of materials, and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 16. Any approved digging or trenching beneath a canopy shall be manually performed. In the event roots of two inches and greater are encountered during the process, the project arborist shall be consulted for appropriate action. 17. Removal of the existing parking lot and curb/gutter must be carefully performed to avoid excavating soil and roots during the process. Any tractor used during the process must work remain on hardscape at all times and off exposed soil and roots. In the event significant roots (e.g. two inches and greater in diameter)' are found to have exploited base rock beneath the existing asphalt, the roots should be Ieft intact and the base material used for the new parking lot. 18. Prior to grading or excavating soil beyond 10 feet from a tree's canopy, aone-foot wide trench should be manually dug along the perimeter of a foundation for the entire distance. The trench should be dug to at least three feet below grade or the required depth, whichever is greater, and shall occur where excavation will occur closest to the trunk. Any roots encountered during the process should be cleanly severed against the soil cut. Roots with diameters of two inches and greater should be treated according to the project arborist. 19.Overcut should not exceed a distance of 18 to 24 inches from a foundation or utility trench. 20. Prior to construction, Irecommend afour-inch layer of coarse wood chips {f/4- to 3/,- inch in size) is manually spread on unpaved soil beneath the trees' canopies. These 212G5 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino Page y of i ~ City of Cupertino Community Development Department 27 - 181 Dm~id L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 24, 2007 chips must not be placed against the trees' trunk, should remain throughout construction, and can be obtained from a tree service company and/or by contacting www.reuserinc.com. 21. Any approved activity required beneath a tree's canopy (within and beyond the designated fenced areas) must be performed under direction of the project arborist. 22. All existing, unused lines or pipes beneath the canopies of retained trees should be abandoned and cut off at existing soil grade. 23. Each recommendation that is presented within Section 6.1 of this report and is applicable to the actual development of the site shall be followed. 24. Throughout development, supplemental water must be supplied to the retained trees; the project arborist shall determine the specific trees, intervals, amounts and application methods. 25. The pruning and removal of trees shall be performed per the project arborist's scope of work and under the supervision of an individual certif ed by the ISA (and not performed by construction personnel). Any tree stumps being removed beneath or near canopies of retained trees should be ground below grade rather than pulled up with an excavator. All approved tree removals should be marked with paint (such as by an "X") prior to being removed. 26. All equipment shat] be positioned to avoid the thanks and branches of trees. Where a conflict arises, the project arborist must be contacted to help address the situation. 27. All ivy should be removed off and at least two feet from the trees' trunks. This work should be manually performed. 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Page 10 of 11 City of Cupertino Community Development Department 27 - 182 David L. Babby, Registered Consztlting Arborist July 24, 2007 28. The disposal of harmful products (such as chemicals, oil and gasoline) is prohibited beneath canopies or anywhere on site that allows drainage beneath canopies. Herbicides should not be used beneath the trees' canopies; where used on site, they should be labeled for safe use near trees. Prepared By: Date: July 24,.2007 David L. Babby, R ~ ~7f~~ ~. ~. ~; 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Page 11 of 11 City of Cupertino Community Development Department 27 - 183 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 24, 2007 EXHIBIT A: TREE INVENTORY TABLE 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department 27-184 TREE INVENTORY TABLE ,-1 i; c .- o y ^ 3 - o °~ °' ~~ ~ o ° d U ~ .. TR);E:: TAG .. . ~ v . ~ ~ ._ !3 1"i ,T ~ .. o.< ~ ~ . ~~ e o ~ .:r~ x .Q 8. e _ o ~. , .. .. NO ' I~AME` E TR) ~' h . ~ • ~- ' : O • • 7 ' O- !j ~ ~ G rrr ' ~~i ' C ".. At -rC4- ,._`W s :,•'~~. -,. NO,_ : . . ~ ... - -, .. F-~ U . . . trY:.. ...n .. 4r ...:: 4 . , m. ._< .... . . . : .. . ,} i . c . . Japanese Maple 1 183 (,4cer palmalum) 8, 6, 4 15 25 50% 50% Fair Low 5 - X Comments: Branch dieback and significant trunK damage. Coast Live Oak 2 g (Quercus a rifolia) 19 40 35 75% 100% Good Hi h 5 - X Comments: Minor tip dieback. Coast Live Oak 3 108 (Quercus a rifolia) 14 20 20 50% 75% Fair Moderate 5 - X Comments: Decline in canopy. Coast Live Oak q {Quercus agri ulia) 4 15 10 100% 75% Good Hi 5 - X Comments: Crowded growing conditions. Planted beneath tree #5 and should be relacated somewhere else so its rannnv ran ar-hiPVP a fi]I~ And svmme#r1Cfll form. Comments: Significant cavities and decay throughout trunk and Limbs. Coast Live Oak uercus a ri olia) 37 45 65 50°/a 50% Fair Moderate 5 - X Comments: Four cables are within canopy. There is a cavity a# about eight feet high on east side. 7 102 Coast Live Oak (Quercus a ifolia 39 40 40 25% 50% Foor Low 5 - X Comments: Significant dieback throughout canopy. Tree in.decline. There is a Large wound at the lower trunk's east side. One cable is within cano 8 3 Coast Live Oak (Quercus a rifolia) 42 40 45 50% 25% Poor Low 5 - X Comments: Four cable within canopy. Large wounds along west side. 9 4 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) 7.5 15 10 50% 100% Fair Moderate 5 - X Comments: Sparse canopy. 10 9 Coast Live Oak ( uercus a ri olia 31.5 30 30 50% 50% Fair Moderate 5 - 3C Comments: Sparse foliage. Two cables in canopy. Site: 21265 Stevens Creek 8ouievard, Cupertino Prepared for City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart. Prepared by: David L Gabby, RCA 7 of Z2 July 24, 2007 27 - 185 TREE INVENTORY TABLE .- _ _, ~~ r ~ ,o ;~ s o _ : ; : ,.. ~, -, .3 ... 4vr .. 3 ..~ .~ ~ Y 6J a - f/i • - ~ - ~ - .. . , ` ~ R w- : ~ ~ ~ I ~. Qb i b ~ .~ ~ ~ ~,. y. : a ~ ~ . TRE$_ .: .. TAG : •,. ~ : . : _. I ' . b ~~' ' :- - : ~ o e~~y r, .~$ - 4 '•:~-~- ~ ,~ - :~ ~ ; ~ a Q ~. ~ o w _ k NO: . _ NO, - I -. TREENA ~E .• , ~. - 1 : i--~ .e ~ .. ,v, : . v . ...... ..., . cn v~ . . . r.. ~ a.. . t t Coast Live Oak ((luarruc aQrifolia) 29.5 35 30 25% 50% Poor Low 5 - X Comments: Sparse carropy. 12 18 Coast Live Oak ercus a ri olia 14 20 20 SQ% 50% Fair Moderate 5 - X Comments: Sparse canopy. 13 17 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrl olio) 14.5 25 30 75% 100% Good High 5 - X Comments: 14 Coast Live Oak ~ (Quercus agrifolia) 3 I I 8 I 7 ° ~ 100 /0 ~ 100% I Good I High I 5 - X Comments: 15 Crape Myrtle (La erstroemia indiea 7.5 10 10 75% 100% Good Hi h 5 - X Comments: 16 Coast Live Oak (Quercus a ifolia) 4 10 8 100% 75% Good Hi 5 - X Comments: New install. 17 86 Coast Live Oak (Quercus a rifolia) 39.5 35 35 50% 25% Poor Low 5 - X X Comments: There is a large cavity along the southwest side. 18 Crape Myrtle La erstroemia indiea } 2.5 15 8 75% 100% Good Hi h 5 - X Comments: 19 Crape Myrtle La erstroemia indica) 3.5 15 8 75% 100% Good Hi h 5 - X Comments: 20 87 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei 17 30 40 50% 25% Poor Low 5 - X Comments: Poor attachment and decay. Slte: 24265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared fins: Cfty of Cupertfio Comm. Develop. Depart. Prepared by: David L. flabby, RCA 2 of 42 July 24, 2007 27 - 186 TREE INVENTORY TABLE Vy ttf Q GL rA .. s. Y ~ ~, v ~, , ~ • ~' >b. ~ Y. it - ~ ~ iit a b ~-' -ia _ ... ;._ ~ ~ .~ TREE 1'iAG ~ _- .. , '~ .o ~ a _ ~ ~: _ _.~..~ ITtEL NAME :. 21 ~ ~ Crape Myrtle ~Lagerstroemia indica) 3 5 15 10 75% 75% Good High 5 - X Comments: Planted to deep (like other two crape myrtles). 22 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 23.5 45 45 100% 50% Good Moderate 5 - X Comments: 23 Shamel Ash {Fraxinus uhdei) 24 40 35 100% 50% Gaod Moderate 5 - X Comments: 24 Crape Myrtle (La erstroemia indica) 4 IS 10 75% 75% Good High 5 - X Comments: 2g Crape Myrtle {La erstroemia indica} 3 10 8 75% 75'% Good 1Ti 5 X Comments: 26 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei 22.5 50 35 50% 50% Fair Low 5 - X Comments: • 27 Crape Myrtle (La erstroemia indica) 3 10 8 75% 75% Good 1-Iigh - S X Comments: 28 91 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 27 50 60 75% 50% Fair Low - X X Comments: Has damaged adjacent hardscape. 29 92 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei } 24 •40 40 75% 25% Fair Low - X X Comments: Cavity along lower trunk. 30 58 Monterey Pine (Pinus radiata 18.5 30 30 25% 50% Poor T_ow - X X • Comments: Tree is dying. Beetle attacks observed. Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared for. City of Cupertino Comm. Revelop. Depart July 24, 2007 Prepared by: David L. flabby, RCA 3 of 12 27 - 187 TREE INVENTORY TABLE _ _ - ~. - a: ..-• ~.. ~ _ ,. .~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~?' g ~ ~ ~ c y _ °? c ai O F Q a> o.. -~ o ~ tJ ~ 3 .. ~ ~o +abi~ _ ~ .v CJ: f~ c'}3~..~ ~• c~ •~' ~~5a' '~' ~ ..~ ebi - o, . TRF.1; .TAG ~ v ~ ` ~.,~ _ u .S ~ '~ ~ u ,x °Q $ ~ c _ ~ IVO:- .NO TIiEENAME . E-+:C~7 , u`~:_: rn" P;~. i~`Q. :~ _ w~i_~ '`.~°.'~., •~ w a _ o 31 57 Monterey Pine (Pinus radiata 14 20 20 25% 75% Poor Low - X X Comments: Tree is dying. 32 56 Monterey Pine Pinus radiata) 23.5 35 35 50% 75% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: Sparse canopy. 33 55 Monterey Pine (Pinusradlata) 17.5 30 30 75% 50% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: 34 54 Monterey Pine .Pinus radiata) 22 25 35 75% 50% Fair Moderate - X Comments: 35 53 Monterey Pine (Pinus radiata 23 30 30 25% 50% Poor Low - X Comments; Tree is dying. Beetle attacks observed. 3G Willow-Leafed Peppermint (Luca! lus nicholii) 13.5 25 20 l00% 75% Good Moderate - X Comments: 37 Aleppo Pine (Ptnushala psis) 14.5 l5 20 _ 75% 75% Good Moderate - X Comments: 38 Willow-Leafed Peppermint (Coca! tus nicholii 12.5 20 .20 100% 50% Good Moderate - X Comments: 39 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agri olio) 7 12 15 100% 75% Good Hi h - X X Comments: Ivy covering trunk. 40 49 Monterey Pine (Punts radiata 12 10 20 50% 75% Fair Low - X Comments: Short tree with low-branching architecture. Tree is situated within island of parking lot (see map for its estimated location). Slte: 2'!265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared for: Cfty of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart Prepared by: David L Babby, RCA 4 of 12 July 24, 2007 27 - 188 TREE INVENTORY TtiBLE _ _ ~ - Y o ^ n_ TI2EE TAG :. .-. - ~ o, b ~,o :°' °° `~ ~ o- '--O o . . BNAME ' O°~ wr~ ' . I! :, a,,V;.. _~ ~ "'- tv . .. ~ , ND,, NO: ... TR~ '. , . . . , . , . _ - 41 Willow-Leated Yepperm mt {Eucalyptus nichofii) 13 5 20 20 100% 50% Good Moderate - X Comments: 42 47 Monterey Pine (Pinus radiates) 15.5 15 20 75% 50% Fair Moderate - X Comments: 43 Willow-Leafed Peppermint (Euca1 tus nichofii) 14 30 20 100% 75% Good Moderate - X Comments: 44 45 Monterey Pine (Pinus radiates 20 30 30 0% • 0% Dead Low - X Comments: Tree is dead. 45 Willow-Leafed Peppermint (Eucalyptus nichofii) 16 20 20 100% 75% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 4G 42 Monterey Pine (Pfnusradiates) 17 20 20 50% 75% Fair Moderate - X Comments: Tree is declining. 47 Willow-Leafed Peppermint (Eucalyptus niehafii) 17,5 25 25 100% 25% Fav Moderate - X Comments: Weak attachment between two leaders. 48 Monterey Pine (Pinus radiates 20.5 30 35 25% 50% Poor Low - X Comments: Has declined severely as 60-percent of canopy is dead. Has significantly been attacked by bark beetles. 49 39 Monterey Pine (Punts radiates) 22.5 25 30 75% 75% Good Moderate - X Comments: 50 38 Monterey Pine (Punts radiates) 20.5 35 30 25% 75% Poor Low - X Comments: Tree is dying, Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared for City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart Prepared by: David L. Sabby, RCA 5 of J2 July 24, 200r 27 - 189 TREE INVENTORY TABLE .. w .. - ,~ ~-+ .. Y ~ .O o o .~ 3 q ~ ~ ~~ :. Vl ~ ~ N c'a • ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .' . ' °~ ~ 't o = a . v ,- I - I = .-~ - - ~• .c , ' c ~; . - " TRE$ :TAG .:- ~ '~ a . ~ :~ ~:.~ .o '~G ,$ ~4 ~ ~ w : ~ ~_. A ~. ° A ' . NO - . TREE NAME _ ^' . .-. - - P+ - _ . ° . 51 37 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei 21 45 35 50% 50% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: 52 Shamel Ash Fraxinus uhdei } -16.5 45 30 75% 25% Fair Moderate 1 - Comments: Tree is situated behind fence. 53 136 Monterey Pine {Pinus radiates) 23 40 40 50% 75% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: 54 ~ i83 ~ (Pinusradiates) ~ 19 ~ 30 ~ 30 ~ SQ% ~ 75% ~ Fair ~ Moderate ~ - ~ X ~ ~ X ~ Comments: 55 184 Monterey Pine (Pinus radiates) 21 25 30 50% 50% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: 56 I85 Monterey Pine (Pinus radiates 16 35 25 75% 75% Good Moderate ] - X Comments: 57 l86 Raywood Ash (Fraxinus o. 'Raywood') 12.5 25 30 75% 50% Fair Moderate 3 - X Comments: 58 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei 4 20 15 75% 25% Fair Low - X X Comments: This tree is a volunteer. Diameter reflects measurement at base of its trunk. 59 Shamel Ash 137 {Fraximts uhdei ]7.5 45 40 100% 50% Good Moderate - X X Comments: Adjacent io maintenance shed. 60 138 Shames Ash (Fraxinus uhdei 16 40 30 100% 25% Fair Low - X X Comments: Has a large girdling root and poor structure. is adjacent to maintenance shed Slte: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared fir: City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart. Prepared by: David L flabby, RCA 6 of J2 July 24, 2007 27 - 190 TREE INVENTORY TRBLE 1.-.. ~ ~ Yn... ~ ~- /1. - y ~ ~ - .~ ~ --, - -- .-. . z . _ ~ .~ . ~, _ .. - ~ g ~, ~ ~A _ _ _ - - - _ - '~ ~ . TREE TACs ... - ., M ~ ~~ - ~ +- q c •A- NO;. .. NO::.- _ . 3'REBNAI~:: _. . ,. a.-. rte: . x.- . ~.,>.~. ~-... ,.-..v~.~ .: '~:, >.. ..~~ a, ~ .: _- _--Z,-~ 61 139 Shame) Ash ~ (Fraxinus uhdei) I 13 5 I 30 I 25 ° I 100 /0 °` 25 /o ` I Fah• Low - I I X I J X II Comments: Has sustained severe root damage. Its canopy is highly asymmetrical canopy and grows m crowded conditions. Is ad'acent to maintenance shed. 62 35 Shame) Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 24.5 50 50 75% 50% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: Causing hardscape damage. 63 Shame) Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 25 35 40 50% 50% Fair Low - X X Comments: Branch dieback, • 64 31 Shame) Ash {Fraxinus uhdei) 22.5 35 35 75% 50% Fair Low 1 - X Comments; 65 30 Shame) Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 18 45 25 50% 25% Poor Low - X X Comments: Branch dieback 66 Shame) Ash Frazirrus uhdei) 28.5 55 55 I00% 25% Fair Moderate 1* - Comments: If parking island is reconfigured to require any soil cuts or excavation; otherwise it is a " 3," 67 Coast Live Oak (Quercusa rifolia) 20.5, IS 35 50 75% 75% Good High 1* - X Comments: If low-growing, northwest limb requires removal; otherwise. it is a " 2." 6g Evergreen Pear (Pyrus kawakamii) 14.5, 11 25 55 100% 50% Good Moderate - X Comments: Grows in a raised planter. 69 Crape Myrtle (La ersiroemia indica) 4.5(5), 2.5 20 20 75% 50% Fair Moderate - X X Comments; 7p Pittosporum (Pittas Drum eu enioides) 8, 8, 6 25 30 75% 50% Fair Moderate - X Comments: Stte: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared for: City of Cupertino Comm. bevelop. Depart. Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA 7 of 12 J°ly 24, 2007 27 - 191 TREE INVENTORY TABLE .. ~ ~ :o ~. ~` ~~ .. ,.,. : ~ o.: ~ • • u .. -o ~ - U.:~ ~ .d _ o ~ .: V A. - a~.- TREE TAB - ,a.° ~ ~ oo °u..b '~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ _Ca ~ , ~'' ~ ' ,. -- ~ ~~ o ~ Y Y :I..t. ~ - _ ~ ' o a .~ u y A . 1° - Vl t,~ NO: NO TREE NAME ~ . - ,~. 'U... .: L3a'..`.: f1?.. Tll ' : `W:'~>:' "f!2 ~,' ~".+~ ~:.'. T/] ~ . ".: " ,C ti" . °r~'i_A~+ .. ,: w`. 71 Tree-of-Heaven (Ailanthus altissima) 4, 4, 3, 2, 2 20 15 100% 25% Fair Low - X X Commenrts: ?2 333. Holly Oak (Quercusllex) 13.5 30 30 75% 50% Fair Low - X X Comments: Wound along lower trunk. 73 172 Shamel Ash (Fraxirrus uhdei) 19 35 30 75% 50% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: • 74 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 18 30 30 75% 50% Fair Moderate - X X • Comments: 75 171 Shame! Ash Fraxinus uhdei } 14.5 25 25 25% 50% Poor Low - X X Comments: Significant dieback. 76 71 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 14.5 20 20 50% SQ% Fair Low - X X Comments: 77 132 Shamel Ash (Frarimrs uhdei } 19 40 30 25% 50% Poor Low - X X Comments: 78 32 Shamel Ash (Fraxinus uhdei 11 20 20 75% 50% Fair Low - X X Comments; 79 68 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chlnensis) 4.5 10 ] 0 100% 100% Good Moderate - X X Comments; 80 69 Chinese Pistache (Pislacia chinensis) 6 15 20 100% 100% Good Moderate - X X Comments: Sfte: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cuperf-no Prepared for' CIty of Cupertino Comm. develop. depart. Prepared by: David L Babby, RCA 8 of 12 July 24, 21)07 27 - 192 TREE INVENTORY TQ-ELE - _ _ - ~. ~ ` Y~ ~ ~. ,-, - ' ~ ` c' o 3 y T ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~- ~: ~ Qom.: ,~ ~ ,:~ ~ ;:~ _ ~ U TREE TAG.... .'. v !~: ~ ~,.j ~ g_ e.. i .,~ oa _~ x `A $. -' o ,,, .. NO: -NO.: .FREE NAME • H C7 ~ . '~: rv~• .. `x v. ~ v~ '::.. .. 7-» .. .~ .. .., C. °=S a .., °"; _. Z .. xi Chinese Pistache (Piclnria chinensis 1 8 5 IS 25 100% 100% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 82 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 8 15 20 100% I00% Good Moderate - X X Comments: g3 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 7.5 ] 5 25 I00% I00% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 84 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 7 l0 20 75% 100% Good Moderate - X X Comments: g5 Chinese 1'istache (Pistacia chinensis) 4 10 10 100% 75% Good Moderate - X X Comments; 86 lti4 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis 4.5 10 10 75% 75% Good Moderate - X X Comments: g7 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 5 10 15 100% 100% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 88 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis 6 10 20 50% I00% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: 84 62 Chinese Pistache {Pistacia chinensis 7.5 15 20 100% 100% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 9p Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 7 l0 20 100% 50% Good Moderate - X X Comments: Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared for: City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart. Prepared by: David L Babby, RCA 9 of 12 July 24, 2007 27 - 193 TREE INVENTORY TABLE _ ~ k -o - .. ?\ ~ ~+ ~ ~ r ~ ~ '~. y~ y ~ ... 'V ~ . F - _ cd at .~ ~ . ~,'~ ~ o ~ U ~ _ G . .. ~~ ~ _ ./~ ~. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ANNFF( ~ TREE TAG_ . _. ..:. ,. ~ ;° : ~ ~ ~ ` ,4 J3'p .~.~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~. -" ~ :- ~ .~. NO; . NO; ~. • . ... TREE NAME _ i-; UP °. . va ~. - 3. , rn- . u , x: ~.. - • ~. ,... - ~... .. °, .~ , . Chinese Pistache 91 (Pistacia chinensrs S.S 10 20 100% 7S% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 92 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis S.S 1S 20 SO% 75% Fair Moderate - X X Comments: 93 173 Evergreen Pear P kawakamii) l l.S 20 25 I00% 7S% Good Moderate - X X Comments: 9q Evergreen Pear (Pyrus kawakatitii) 8.S 15 20 100% 75% Good Moderate - X ~ X Comments: - 95 74 Shamel Ash {Fraximrsuhdei) 20.5 35 3S 50% SO% Fair Low - X X Comments: 96 Chinese Pistache Pistacia chinertsis) S.S 1S 20 100% 7S% Good Moderate 3 - X Comments: 97 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chfnensis 6.S 15 2S 100% 75% Good Moderate 5 - X Comments: 9g Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensrs) 6 15 ZO 100% 100% Good Moderate S - X Comments: 99 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinertsis) 8 1 S 30 100% SQ% Good Moderate 5 - X Comments: 100 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chtnensis) 4.S 10 20 100% 7S% Good Moderate 5 - X Comments: Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Sou/evaraf, Cupertino Prepared for: City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart Prepared by: David L t3abby, RCA 10 of 12 July 24, 2007 27 - 194 Ti REE iNVENTi ORY Ti ABLE ^ - o o ;u 3 ~ ~ :~ - ~ ~ ~. ~, g ,R.; n. - .,.,.- :,_, :: ter,. ~ ~~ - a= ~ ~„ ~ b• ~ ~ C' .~` G u .- _ ~- .: - , . ~ ~.~\ ., U .O._ -vim ~ ~ a 4r ~ p ~... ~a _.. -. _ _ _ TRFE .TAG. _: .. -,. - , ~o . :~.'. ~ 0._ ~-~- ~°- a~~i. o .:. ..u It ' ~ a -° a. ,° _ - a... _ ~~ ... ~; 'vii.":.'.°.OO..~ _-.~`~... ,.°~.' -~.n..:;.-F''' .-:z~.,: . 3~tO', NO: ,... TREE NAIVIE; •.` . . 4-~ C7 ~ u`~'; -w.. cn .. ~C: ... 101 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 5 15 25 100% 75% Good Moderate 5 - 7C Comments: 102 Coast Live Oak (Quercus agrifolia) 28 30 50 50% 25% Poor Low 5 - 3C X Comments: Cavities throughout tree, sparse foliage. 103 84 Japanese Maple (.4cer almatum) 7, b.5, 5.5 25 30 100% 50% Good Moderate 5 - Comments: l04 83 Pittosporum (Piltos orum eugenioides } 12 15 20 75% 50%. Fair Moderate 5 - Comments: ] OS I , ~ (Quercus agrifolia) ~ 49 ~ 45 ~ 80 ~ 75% ~ 50% ~ Fair ~ High ~ 5 ~ - ~ X ~ ~ _ Comments: Has about six cables in canopy. 106 20 Coast Live Oak ( rerc:rs a i olia) 13 15 25 50% 75% Fair Moderate 5 - X Comments: Sparse canopy. 107 23 Shame] Ash (Fraxinus uhdei) 26 45 60 ] 00% 50% Good Moderate 5 - X Comments: 108 22 Shamel Ash (Frazinus uhdei) 20 40 40 75% 25% Fair Low 5 - X Comments: 109 Monterey Pine 21 (Pines radiata) 20 35 30 75% 50% Fair Low 5 - 3{ Comments: 110 Canary Island Pine (Pines canariensis } 2.5 10 60 100% 100% Good High 5 - X Comments: New install. Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Boutevard, Cupertino ' Prepared for. City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart Prepared by: David L. Gabby, RCA 11 of 12 July 24, 200J' 27 - 195 TREE INVENTORY TABLE ... y~ 3 ~ ,.. ~ fir'`. ~ ~ - ~ - y U 3 .. ._ .. ~_ipp+ W!~ A-~... 0.-'0 ...6p'~ .~, F~~-,,' ~Y]r ~ d~^ `~ ~. 6q~- 6~ R" a ., ~ ~:. TRF:F ° TAG .. _.: _ .. ... ~ .... _ -....b - ~. ~' - - ~,~ ~ .a., ~. .a, - r. ~,°p o ~ x. ° w .. Np; ,~ . NO, . ...~ TR.EEIVf~h?IE :-. •~ :':~,•.:.. -rn .~ ~,.C~J ~ ~ ~; c ~.. S c .:. _ - '~: Z.-.~ Flowering Pear 111 93 P rus cane rra) 14 25 25 100% 25% Fair Low S - X Comments: Excessive limb weight over road; branch/limb failure will be a subsequent result unless pruning occurred. Flowering Pear 112 (Pyrus calleryarta } 14 20 25 100% 25% Fair Low 5 - X Comments: i 113 ~ ~ (Quercus agrifolia) ~ 49 ~ 35 ~ 60 ~ 50% ~ 25% ~ Poor ~ Low ~ 5 ~- I X ~_ ~ Comments: There is a large cavity along lower trunk and various other locations within canopy. External signs of internal deca was also observed. Coast Live Oak I I4 (Quercus a rifolia) 13.5 20 25 100% 50% Good High 5 - X Comments: ( 115 10 (Q oast Li~ Oak) I uercus a r~ olia I 17.5 25 I f ' 30 I 100 /° I I 75 /o ~ Good gh I Hi 5 I - X Comments: 116 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinertsis 6.5 15 20 100% 50% Good Moderate 5 - Comments: 117 13 Chinese Pistache Pistacia chlnensis) 6.5 15 20 100% 75% Good Moderate 5 - Comments: 118 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinertsis) 6.5 15 25 l00% 75% Good Moderate 5 - Comments: 119 Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinerrsis) 5.5 15 20 75% 100% Good Moderate 5 - Comments: Site: 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino Prepared for: City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart. Prepared by: David L. Sabby, RCA 12 of 12 July 24, 2007 27 - 196 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting,grborist July 24, 2007 EXHIBIT B: SITE MAP 21265 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Ca~pertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department 27 - 197 21265 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD, CUPERTINO Exhibit C Colin Jung From: Beth~Ebben on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2008 9:08 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: FW: Oaks Shopping Center Project for your file... -----Original Message----- From: Jennifer Griffin [mailto:grenna5000@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, Apri! 30, 2008 1:23 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Cc: Igiefer@sbcgfobai.net; grenna5000@yahoo.com Subject: Oaks Shopping Center Project Dear Planning Department: I see that plans for the Oaks Shopping Center have been submitted, and are being heard at the Environmental Review Committee today, Apri130, 2008, at 4:30 PM. I am very concerned about the number of trees being removed on the property and the density of the buildings being built in the western portion of the shopping center. While the idea of having a business center at the Oaks is very nice, the sheer size of the two buildings being proposed seems just to be too much for the shopping center. The hotel is very massive and has little articulation. Also, having the two buildings. set only 15 feet from the Highway 85 soundwall projects an image of a.solid, high-density multi-story facade along the freeways. The Oaks is a beautiful shopping center with lush vegetation and plantings and the overall size and density of these buildings doesn't match that tranquil atmosphere. I am also worried about the effect on parking and traffic in the Shopping Center and on the surrounding streets and major intersections of Mary and Stevens Creek Blvd. and Highway 85 and Stevens Creek Blvd. Also, the impact on stuent traffic from the De Anza campus and exit at Stevens Creek and Highway 85 is of major concern. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Jennifer Griffin contr 27 - 199 5/22/2008 Page 1 of I Colin Jung From: Beth Ebben on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 5:34 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: FW: The Oaks Shopping Center (Karen Ngo) for your file.... ----Original Message----- From: Ray Garland [mailto:ray.gar[and@mail.com] Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 11:23 AM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: The Oaks Shopping Center (Karen Ngo) Gentlemen, As a long-time Cupertino resident, I wish to voice my support of this application. Since the theater went dark this has been an eyesore and underused property. I believe the plans as outlined in the No#ice of Public Hearing would be an attractive benefit to the city and its residents. Raymond L. Garland 21890 Meadowview Lane Cupertino,CA 95014 408-255-6916 27 -zoo 5/22/2008 EXHIBIT B -1 Colin Jung From: Larry Cannon [cdgplan@pacbell.netj Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 5:36 PM To: Colin Jung Cc: Steve Piasecki Subject: Marriott Residence Inn Colin I looked at a number of approaches, and finally settled on the most simple, straight forward on. First, I went to the Marriott Residence Inn web site to see what styles they have built in California. There is just about every style one might want to consider. Most are the ones that seemed to approach the building as a "home away from home" with a very strong traditional residential character with wood siding and steep pitched roofs. I only found one example of the new prototype (San Diego Oceanside), but there were a couple of other interesting ones -these are shown on one of the attachments. My impression of the new prototype is that the entry lobby structure is interesting, but that the main building is not much different from, or better than, the normal mid-range motor hotel. The main "tower" behind the lobby looked especially lacking in interest. The suggested changes include the following: 1. Use clay tiles to match the shop~in cg enter on all roofs (I believe you said that the applicant has already agreed to this). 2. Extend the roof overhangs on all sides of all roofs and treat with the brackets shown on the upper roof element at the lobby. Currently, they seem to be limited to a few places facing the front of the structure.. Adding some richness and detail at the roof overhangs will help, I think. 3. Adding balconies or grilles at some of the windows -balconies would be best. If just grilles are used, they need to have some dimensional projection from the face of the wall. I note that the prototype photo looks like it has some window grilles, but they are just filled in almost flush with the window, which is not sufficient to have any significant impact. {This approach was taken on the Cypress Hotel). The Sari Diego Downtown Residence,Inn has some slightly projecting grilles. 4. Adding some awnings on the structure (This approach was also taken on the Cypress Hotel). The awnings and the balconies above should be carried around all sides of the structure, not. just placed on the front elevation. They will help add visual interest to the freeway side and will assist in screening the windows from the west sun exposure. 5. Carry the brick base of the lobby building around on all sides of the main building. 6. Intensify the color a bit on the stucco at the base portion of the building. Please don't take any colors that you see on these diagrams literally. They are quite different on both my monitor and my printer, so what they look like on your equipment is anyone's guess. 7. Push the windows back from the wall face as much as possible. That helped a lot at the Cypress Hotel, and should be easier here given the window trim proposed. I also studied the use of wood siding on the top floor (often a technique to reduce visual height, add 27 - 201 6/4/2008 Page 2 of 2 interest at the top of buildings, and establish a stronger residential image}, but decided it was too much. Go to the links listed below to download the pdf files. Let me know if you need anything further. I should be in the office all day on Monday. Larry http://www.mediafire.com/?tl r~vi0yd5h http:l/www.medialire.com/?snwnu 1 nlbmx littp://www.mediaf re.com/?yt~~gya2 http://www.mediaf re.com/`?mh2sml~gmb z~ - zoz 6/4/2008 Balcony /Grille Examples Marriott Residence Inn Cupertino N CANNON DESIGN GROUP ~ May 30, 2008 N O W Add awnings and balcony/grilles Balconies need to pr%ct fo be eHectlve Set windows as deeply from wall surface as possfb[e A •~ ~• ~ ~' A J~ Use clay the to match shopping center on al! roofs .~ Carry brick base around building Darker base color Achitectural Enhancements Marriott Residence inn Cupertino CANNON DESIGN GROUP May 30, 2008 A A & B: Use extended eave with brackets at all roofs N v N O A :~~. A r a 4 2 to fY ^ f I ~ i D~y('S1t7ShYY~+ F'hh}: '~n~~ ~" 9t i1~ ' ~!!~ ^ ~ x i , ~ ~ ~. ~_ ~n t~1 ~ ~ iY ~l p ~5, ~~ kl,~ ~ 1 41, ~ ~r, • ~y'°~ 1~~ } ~t ~` y . . ~.y~, t~ u ~ w r ~~: ~ ~,` 1 San Diego Downtown A ~~~ _. ~`' ,c , ~ ` ~ ~ !Vote awnings and balconies ~' 4 , ~..__ Marriott Residential Inn Examples Marriott Residence Inn Cupertino N CANNON DESIGN GROUP I~ay 30, 2008 ~~ ~~ !„ '1!~ p !. ~r ~ _r~ - i ~`~ Los Angeles Westlake Village Note windows and brackets at bay popout ~ _ ~ . ,~. `, ~~ ~~;* ~~ (~ 11i '°t t1 V ew San Diego Oceanside New Prototype Achitectural Enhancements Marriott Residence Inn Cupertino CANNON DESIGN GROUP May 30, 2008 -- - n~-, z-f, r~icti~~iCtiti•. • ~ ~i° .. ,•3~~-.+r.+ - ~,r.n;fi:ri uiFti.: "b b'.+~a-n";e...r'l..s•;:,rr~-.-•n~-~s' -;.:~i. • - 1A300 TorrC Avcr.ur' .. '• Cu~erl{rio. Cri111rrrnisi 45615' -- . • ; - Cuiiertino; C~liiarnl~ $505d' .. • ~ - ;. ~'. ;. --• • - • ' - Tclaphona: {4DBI 252-505 ... - . . . ~ •. ' -. - - - - . ' ~or-r~i;c~ or• •~I~c c~~rv c~~~ic _ . -+ . - :. - .. . - ,- -..: ~ - _ . ~ : ~ _ • ~Iie 5tottcsoll DevQlon~ Corp. ~ - ~ . 3150 20th Awenua . • ~ 5an 1~'lc'l.I1Ci.~,COr ~ 95182 - - . ' C.C'z'X COUIdCZL nCTIbN ~ ~O~~Uw86 . . ' - `I4ii:~ will, cnnF~.rm tha acL~ian by thQ c3,ty Ck~uncil• st their mEetang a~ - 3uly 21r 19Fi6 at •~•,hich yaur ~Applicatxon 20-U-a6 brae upprr~Ved per:,#:he _ .. i:al,lc•w+ing carx~itions: - ~ - - . _ •. ~...~d~IJS 0 TAP - ~--~-~' . PT---- NNT~K' ~'P.FI~t • - - 1, ~I~~ a~aixz3rrs - ~ . 7'tta x~~tion o~ a~~,`a+ta].. ~a b~sod on E>c~iitiits A; Aw]., A . 2 ~ ' ' ~rxi ~:nPa, oC ?i~~.~.c.~tiari zU-U-GG except. as ~iy ba a~l-enda~ kr~,:. . ,: special. roixlitior~ •~ ~tnt~ei~tad herein. - - .. - - ~,[`he apply-cant/a~rnexs. shah. x~txik~ than fix. ~r?c.l.rx~ ~i.s~~:c~s to . ~'ha . ;~ncXeasa parking ~f,iel~ i:t~ nppxoiciyn~C~ly.'S~~••p~x1~~>x~.sp~tx~s. - _ . N:eStxipirx) }~l.att ba ~ul~jEact to E#taE~ xavieHt. aril apprrn-ul and. s~.l- . ~ apprtrve~cl in,plemerlt~i ~ir~o~c to ~$si.itsnc~. uE t11a Eixu~ . ~' - Cacrv~xtncy knit tax' tha Po~mr~.r ~arx9pipo.r or I3y ttay i9n7; ~fcnt~ oP o~ex~atiatt ~~alk txa :1-iml~.~c! PrQrn G a,m, to iy~iciniglti:. L•o~; ~ • ~ ~ • xe~il•.~:hap~r arid.G~QO A,in. ~Ga°-~t~gtJ a.m, Pn>c xe~lt~uz~'i~. f~53.~:'-G~pWiirr. ~'k'.Sk'.LTili~ctT'1~1~7 4J~WL~1 ~~c~ c+ttntc~~ axia Xxal'mi~t~pd t~ .m~xi~~nt . - a~C 2U, hU0 stl, ~;i:. arlc~ .s m~ini,>n~ ~>t' (fOQ ~.a4:~1 ~~,t~. A initior. ac~~uu:zr,~: ~r1 x'i1~tt~~t~t a~xo riuxy ~~ 1:~t~miGt'+~xf wi~~axt i#: ~ ~ ~' . +<3~t~art.rt'x~t~et] i:.tuii: tk°-~i ~~t:Al.. •ia rlc~t- ax~c~di.rs~; t~ta.~ t~ Yttn~ix:x~, ~~ lattici c~r-Cc~t~~rnri~ttt~ ~x lava ~ music 'ir. ~aa>,~nS,.tt~ ~ ' ~'tir~ - - . .: . a c nqr hu.l.ldilig may - - ~•ep~,~c~.t~annfti'iG- ro~katu'~n~ ~~~ - tfla i~'t~L'~'r~' ~t~t'i~ ~ .-. , : .: " :..,= , - ~.. ~ ~nti.riua ~q~ tir~vei s ~e~~ .:~~ai.~.~l,~~:I~~ ~ ~ th9 ~~ ~ r =~ ;.f ,,...~_. , - r 'It ~ ~~ A.1 ..~,,~t• ^'^G"'~ _ .1.41 '+~.~. ., ~Y'(-r`t y1~,{ Ss;r~,,b,t~, 7 . . •~' ..: •.+... :'7 , -..: ~~;T'1~y~:.,~7~`~r:~#~~~I~t#.id'~]dn'" ~~ ~,`s~x~FS&t~tjP.t~~. .~r ~~t^~f=i,.y3 ~~;,. ;urfc-- .<G:XQ .n r` ,~.T,~ Rii:.*tiza. tr~:.Y -aF, -'6 'q?!~~~~&~-, ~y~~"~..•fi ~1-!''En. .~ .a}~,.~~; ~r. t,_-r:. ' ,;. .. +~ ~,.: ,~::.r.~~a.,.,:. ~ ..~ fir.. ;4'~R`aw_,a.~~. ~~t~,-„ c"?:'t.ri 4 L *;~~~' •. hT. ~„ t_ '~~ ~~,-. ~X t r: .' .=l: r'.~ fir' _;%%?`,•'!^Gi 3. =k::t_~.1,'~: r '~. ~: - _ _ - 4 ~ ~ y.~i ~y s 4.' ~~L C~QIF.RCI1~0 • s. .New use az reuea oP space wittxirt the Oakv Shi:~pp#atg• Cextt~x ah~l.._ . by Iimitod to -uses a3.7.awpd -without: the sc~tritx,~ a~ a.~use:pextnit . utxier the Citr-y ~ i:: ~ General Cclnan~.-cial Zoning ordinance ~ or any successor.'. 1~7.]. nth~x~ uses noL- ~addressc3d in Corxii~ion Na.: 3 ~abcNe sha~.l rewire use -j~i-mit review ~ and approval . ~ . 5. ~L~~.Q1~21~QdG PRC~f3iZ~+iS lzi the event; ox i.~it'ure parkirx~ proble2ve caused by a da~~.c:~t •~.n . - ptt,rkitig spaces to awc~r rues in tltia oaks Gent-eJ:, the •Pl~uthftxl Caanmiss.on resexves_ .tho right t;v ho],d u p~ublio hc~ariatg`-at any . time to review this use i~•. end to impose m~siaxes to m~tic,~"~ta the proble.~ns. k~mp].es oP same o.~ the rneasux~ whiex, may }~a impo:.;«i are as fa~.l.otrls : - •- .. . a. Organize ~t ~loyee•~rax pr~olir-g/vart:pavli.rxf program.. . b. ~iacan,>~iqure t:}te parki.txi ~ arxange~tierit , to ~ •incr~,so p~kitxY yield; passibly i.ncl~tdir~g ~ndi~ical:iorts ~ of ctitrb taxi dri.v~r;,my .• . is].ttttds. . - . 3:. i.,lfii.t ~ui~ur~t uses to • lc~w: txaf~i,c genea:at:i.nc3 csrntrnexc~al ~usea ax uses . wtt~,ch da riot titti~ct: cus~nme~.~ du~.~ax,~~ .p'~xiocls vlhic~i . acre impacts by' skressive par}cing demar'td.. ~ -Y~",~~. d. Adjust -, ',L~C'S, t}uough attrition, to ~~s ixtt:ensive t ai:. ~ . - uses which rl~ .npt genexa~ activity dt~xi r~ iis~act~ pexials.• ~ ~ ' . ~E. tdfxi~.~Y ~cist:itty u5~ ~rpon.. expir~atioit o~ then: lat+si~ to decrease actriv~.ty durixrg irr~ctr~l.geriods. ~ .- ~. . g. • it~e5tricting riou~ .off.. Luttu:a leases. At:oYzi.teatu~l madifir~t:iorks to acx7da~anac~ritie tx~w t^e~tttr~ts r~.ll. bQ . sul~nit;tod to and >apprav.~cl by t~hQ Arohit~-'tu7.~a~, and ~it4 1~rciVe~.1 Ccmcnittee. -Ttta• applic~at~ may trpp~-], ci~i.s~.cina oP the Ca~19i~i,ttC~R t;a ttta C~.ty Ccxutc~.l. ~ ~ • - - Tn tru3 evaatt tTitat t1tt~ .~ippl$caitt - or- euk~~ie~uent; prpperCy rimer - .. - ~~],i.. clesixe~ to ma?ee •any minor c:tiarx~a, a~.te~.x~Gi.vtt ©r~amet~tment: ,~tt ~ ~ . . ,the ar.~~~rvvct ~t~voibpm~t~ ~x~n ox k~ii.~.c~i.~c~ . ~xmit, . a wr~it~Cc-~ . zrrqucst . ~t~ ~viaect •deve~xes~ars~nlr ~a].rut or.". }711~.1Ci.irt~~ taox'x~,ik: '.~1R~.~.~ kx; iSU~i~t~ 1:0 thAl U.~,~~tOxt. ,.Ql: ~'1~~'7Jtixr~ ~~. D~vQlr7~t'h{~tt=.. • ~~.FttGt, ; °,',- .. . - r - T~j.X,GtG~a~ ]1'OJ.k.~rld. ~' ~~'?~;~ .t~t17~ t:~]Q ~lat'I~A~J'.81~~.'!E,'1.C~R~ :'~ :typ• 1'iGt;•' ' + • . ` .: s• .- _ ~w _-. :. .r ..S _.'-`'-- ia.ta. r.:rFillfr~:'...,..r;6•.~r- ~kr`..~:•-~,.rv~"Z's,3~'~..:iF..a'.. J':;~ a..:`:~.:_. ...,_,':,l':tt.'~.a:~1.sf1cat6ir.l~nsSii'.t`ur.,':--,:°.~`- __• .lvitt•'x' Pe' + C .1'!S{a' %i:iF} . rky;.'.L y'~:~hv,'..,;,r"' Ctr".?~ l~F::.. r~_;,~c~"„~,- •in i~ ~.- tr~ ier" 'Ye';:.- ..,~' -~t•: '.t/~Y-a-~. '^,,' :+c' -:R +n'~ .5~~%",3'... .a~,,.#.~°,-_~'_'-.S'•:,~stT'4x~.~ ~ ,~.-T ~'.~i?!~:•}~•• ~f !; :4~,~ -:tY;r-:~ .~"•*'T.. - I. •!: iitt~'- -n ~!yiisiC-tr:~;• L uRf.• 1 `Jr~A••~ ~~,.r •. -- .i ,f 4•.~r ~TIS ..•:~•t.'M~..UMt;. - :~"r rr. 5;,-- !-?' ,i-w;=: Y:3 `.•,f ~1 - K':- d':=7a+ .., :• •t •r'~ .d:...I -~-. Y~:o-• _ q~l:~:~ i":. /p.- ,~., r 17c r•7 ;,+ .l't ~.b.. ~Y.. .Y. m j:.i--Y_ :J}. ..h l-3 r. r.'~•,-i: xf~ Y+,~._ S. n ...v ». . ..• . ' ... ...... - .~~ -t - i~- .. .M1 . -i ., ~ N . . • ~ ;, •; - . .. F, a~~ecY. the geriexa]. •appearancp of the aa:ea Qx' tha interests o:~ - . ch/t~erS oP prapexty~with~.n-ar adSoining tine devQ].vpm~it area, the . Dixectax may certify the chatxje earl the kevised~p~,an. ~# ~urh :~ :.• . ~, appi~Val is witl~h~ld, ttie-~p~1.iC~nt may app~~. to the planning camEnission. Tf the- cha~x,~es are: material:, tt~a t~itiector mix ~ ~ .. - ~ sul~rnit• said cnar'r~es to the •plaruting -ccmmtission~ £or approva~..~ 7l': - ~ • • thQ chatx~e is denied by tho Plaruiing . C'.onsi-iss~,on~ ttia .applicant may appeal.. to tha City Council -as provided in OxatlkznrA fa5~ of . the City of Cupc~xtino. I€ the chantte is appxvvnd, an ap~ei~l. ~- bo made kay an intere.~teci p~.-ty, I1irther, any mem~x of the Ci.t'1- . Caur~l.~. may Xegue~c a hearing IxaPora the City cbw~cil; said . request: t.o lx~ made witl~.fn €:en (lOj days Ercan the dAte.a~ z~ppx~oval - yrt~en the chatrg~ has txen.Appzavacl by tYtA k~latuli.ng ccma~.i.ssiart. Zt~e escpiration of tha use pez'mit is J~~].y 21, 1.984.'. (Section 6. A aP ~ . ' Ot-dirlance No. 652 as revised 13y Ordif~anca too. ].13Gj . ~ ~ _ _ Si»'eerely, .. pOI~OTi CX WRt'xELIUS ~ . , . . CZ'i"~l ~ CLE~tK .. . ~ .. ~ _ cc. L~partanent o~~ plax~n.iTx3 and Ik~velapn~tit.• . : ~ - - Ai•~~ce Dp~t©ile.le ~ ~ - ' 21269 Sr©ver~ G`ree3c I~uldva~ CUperti.r,o~ CA ~ 961314 ~ ' . . '• C •y. t. ~ ' ' ~' ^''S •j.+ 't[A~' •! yry i L,(4&~ t,T ' . .. _ .. .`'h•i_'• !Y •~ .. .. .'.,~tk'~"~ *::."3'.r-,r,'.xG"tJ..:7T.tK1r.~.3'.~:iaiT ~:'±!J~ iK. bFP~C Exhibit D~-1 Colin Jung From: Beth Ebben on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 7:37 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: FW: Planning Commission Meeting regarding OAKS SHOPPING COMPLEX for your file.... -----Original Message----- From: Nat Nataraj [mailto:nat nataraj@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 7:43 PM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: Fw: Planning Commission Meeting regarding OAKS SHOPPING COMPLEX ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Nat Nataraj <nat_nataraj@yahoo.com> To: clerk@cupertino.org Cc: nagamani.nataraj@gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 5:51:41 PM Subject: Planning Commission Meeting regarding OAKS SHOPPING COMPLEX Respected Members, We reside at 10599 Nathanson Avenue, Cupertino. We are against the building of the Hotel complex at the current OAKS complex. Reasons being: 1. Increase of traffic congestion on MARY avenue. The completion of the bicycle/Ped bridge will bring in additional bike/foot traffic on Mary Avenue. 2. Mary Avenue serves as a parking facility for the cultural events held at Memorial Park and De Anna College. The addition of this new building would impact the current use of this road. 3. The heavy foot and automobile traffic combined with the trafic from the Hotel complex would complicat things. 4. Why add a new hotel, when we have the Cupertino Inn and the Cypress Hotel nearby? The Hotels are probably running at 50% occupancy rate. We are extremly concerned about the traffic and speeding motorists on Mary and the addition of a Hotel will make this street more unsafe and unfit for cyclists and Pedestrians. Regards, Nagamani Nataraj B.S. Nataraj 27 - 210 6/2/2008 EXHIBIT B - 2 Colin Jung From: Karen Ngo [kngo@shpco.com] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 6:35 PM To: Colin Jung; dkaneda@ideasi.com; pauldbrophy@yahoo.com; HMartyMiller@yahoo.com; Rosetracy3@sbcglobal.net; Igiefer@sbcglobai.net Cc: Steve Piasecki; 'peter pau' Subject: RE: Marriott Residence Inn- Applicant Comments to Staff Report and Recommendations Dear All, Attached please find our response to the conditions proposed by the Community Development Department in the staff report. Thanks Karen From: Colin Jung [mailto:ColinJ@cupertino.org] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 fi:11 PM To: dkaneda@ideasi.com; pauldbrophy@yahoo.com; HMartyMiller@yahoo.com; Rosetracy3@sbcglobal.net; Igiefer@sbcg to ba I .net Cc: Steve Piasecki; kngo@shpco.com Subject: FW: Marriott Residence Inn- Applicant Comments to Staff Report and Recommendations The applicant, Karen Ngo, requested that I forward her comments onto the Planning Commission. Paper copies will be available at the hearing tomorrow. Colin Jung Senior Planner City of Cupertino -----Original Message---- From: Karen fVgo [mailto:kngo@shpco.com] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 5:19 PM To: Colin Jung Cc: 'Peter Pau' Subject: RE: Marriott Residence Inn Colin, Including or excluding the garage? Haw would this be accomplished, through an agreement with the City? Also, how would we implement it so that it is only limited to the number of lost Mary Avenue stalls? Also, an update on the other issues bouncing around: 1 }Architectural enhancement: Our architect is working on a revised elevation to the front based on Larry's comments. We do not see a need to embellish the freeway side. 2)Condo Plan: Attached is a revised condo plan to have 2 condos rather than ~ condos. 3)Phasing Plan: We cannot change the site plan to move the hotel 20 feet towards Stevens Creek. We had looked at a similar option but by pushing the hotel 20 feet, the circulation and parking changes and the retail becomes so small that it is not worth building. We need to keep the phasing plan which from the last hearing, the majority of the planning commission were ok with. 4)$100,000 contribution towards Stevens Creek: We feel it is not fair to impose this on our project unless the City passes an ordinance and it is imposed on all projects. 27 - 211 6i1 o~2oas Page 2 of 4 5}Stevens Creek Improvement: We can only improve the section in front of Shane Co, as shown on our plans. If you rather we improve a section closer to Stevens Creek, we can do that as long as the cost does not exceed what we are spending on the Shane section. Let me know if there is an area you want us to look at. Thanks Karen From: Colin Jung [maiito:ColinJ@Cupertino.org] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 3:06 PM To: Karen Ngo Subject: RE: Marriott Residence Inn Karen: To get around the loss of Mary Avenue street parking (We don't want this to be an issue), what do you think about sharing a like number of shopping center parking stalls on just the festival days at Memorial Park? Let me know. Colin Jung -----Original Message----- From: Karen Ngo [mailto:kngo@shpco.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 2:06 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: RE: Marriott Residence Inn Thanks! From: Colin Jung [mailto:ColiN@cupertino.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 10:06 AM To: Karen Ngo Subject: RE. Marriott Residence Inn Try opening these jpg files. Colin Jung -----0riginal Message-- From: Karen Ngo [mailto:kngo@shpco.com] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:04 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: RE: Marriott Residence Inn Colin, I can't seem to download the PDFs from the link. Could Lany just send us the PDFs? Thanks . Karen 6/10/2008 z~ - 212 June 9, 2048 Planning Commission and Community Development Department City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, Ca 95014 Re: Oaks Development Dear Planning Commission and Community Development Department: Following please find our responses to some of the proposed conditions to our above referenced project: 2)Development Approva{: Access to underground parking podium will be limited to the hotel for Phase I. Upon completion of Phase II, underground parking wiiE be limited to the hotel and the mixed-used building. 4)Project Phasing: We request herewith that the Phase II approval be in effect for 5 years from City Council acceptance. 6b)Landscape Plan: Heart of the City Specific Plan improvements will be limited to the section between Mary Avenue and the west side of the east driveway (section directly in front of Shane Co.) only. 6c}Landscape Plan: The replacement of two Oaks tha# were previously removed is not part of the new development. 7}Master Use Permit: We request to modify the maximum number of allowed restaurant seats to 600 instead of the proposed 500. $)Green Building: We will achieve LEED certification, but not Silver. 9)Notice of Fees, Dedications, Reservations or Other Exactions: Please let us know the amounts of such fees. 12)Building Materials and Architecture: Please see attached revised elevations. 13)Pedestrian Improvements for Highway 85 Bridge: We do not agree to such contribution unless there is an ordinance requiring such. 29)Traffic Signal Improvements: Developer contribution to this condition shall be limited to $15,000. Sincerely, .-~ ~, : ._ Karen Ngo 27 - 213 ~~" }~~~ ~ ~ ~~ it , ~~• r ,~'~ •a'~~'` ~_ =~~ , °'~ >~ ~ y=' ~ ~ 1 , ~ ~ f ' ~`~ ~ ~ mss'"" x >..~ i ~' . ~~ r. -u- r ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ r1 ~ i AY~yI r ` t} ~ ,pp~ ~ , R l ~ ~ I , ~, 1j{i t4 i ~ ~-c° ~ . .6 ~ yT~.. iii ~ ~ t ~~? 1.~.•~ ` ` ~ F' _ i ~~`.'~ gr '~•.,•:: ._... J r ti i. `~= < , ~ ~+~ ~, , '~' ~ ,= v;~'1*~ ~- _ `a-~ ~ .,fir ~~~ ~~, ~~ ~ ,~- _i, I ~' I E; . r -'- -- , ~..i a , .'~ __ ! ci i (-p`e9,ri, r ~:~ i~ ~ .~ « ~ ;r' dy ~/ T, r'• p ~q 6 . i ~ , .,, ~ , I r ' ~r.~.~: r n _ ;{ ~'~. ~ ..... ~'_~' d .lit • ~ ~ - u ' y~. ~,.t' ~ ~.~ ~°I.~r 41 is ` '` J ~I f ~ , _ i;%' ~, I.~ I'~ y- ~, V tf 3~~` rr a'' ~'". r~^ F~~ t~ ~a ~I ~,~r.,, CUP~iTINO OAKS~,~.„,,,„,,.,~ ~ R n °~' CONCEPTUAL CONDOMINIUM PLAN ~ «-~.~°"° Q ro ~ ~ ~~ ~ FIRST FLOOR ~ `' ~ ~ ~ '°`"'-.""`"° Z CUPERTRirJ CWNTY OF SANTA CLARA CALFORRIA ilrla rJnRUtlIM1~~ ~ 4 O B%F ENGINEER ~ 4 ,. ~ 'TT ,4,,` t ~~'+ ~`{i~l Ott t..~~;•.,.~ rt .. ~~'\•~ '~ 1 _ ~ ~A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i~g4 I ~ .;.,ati t?•. ~$~,* '•.I wat~ };' +_., I UNITA UNTO a, }lilt t~A'~ .t,,.• `•1_ .~.;+ i e ~.-- +y •'•_ s. ,1',,44~tN~ v`l+a.'• ~ ~ J:~. \ ~ ~ Cro~S'+ ao .Z~ GR~C BCLLY ' - 1 ~ ~~ T ~ r',~`-~ ! x+.. ~~ ; `~s}''e~-----' -t : ]"~' a.;n`a_-~So% q ~ ~ !! ',. ~s. ' y." ° , n.>..r a ~,~~q~ Ltit ~J s. { ;c. 1 ~ 5 ,I. ._r^ Y;~ Ut `T ` iY ~ y' ~"!I 1 •{i . h k.I u ~ ~ ~ ~~a' v' ~ i~r`-+^ ~.,._ - L z G~ gg Iw`t °`~ ~ s 'F.cra c n~+~g,~~,, 1 T ~ s+ w: ,"?G ~l ~ I S 1 ~ ~r his . ~ . 1 xt~~ ` ; ~~,r,}rY! ~~ ^• is j `~._- ~.~ ~ ~.a. l t r~ , , ~f iL' '~"3+~ai ~..1~-°~~---~ ` ~ ~ ~'?~, c~~~p jT ,1 .~ ~ 1 y ,~{,4 •~ ~1 lJ' - a V + ~,~,~~~ ,1 .."~-' ~'."".~" ~ ~'~`-~=~-1 I ^s m, ''+-- .I, • . tl$ t .. ~Ri ab . - "~ t , Y ` ~ "C'~ °+ .y •, „ s, ~. ,~,..:,-. •.:- } •-..Irrc, Z \ ~ ~ • . ,~ • ~~ '~, ~N N ~ ~ } ,~ . ..~°'~} ` ~;;-~r4a,.~ Rc 's , , 'T , ~"~ •~-i_.y~"t \ Jas '~ ~ ~_-L'a.. ! ~ _ '.p.• .• t 1 L ° s a ~ t 7~ ~`t+~ ~ . ~-~t. .r~~ - i. __! ~~ ~..~~ ~ '~- ' ~ "~'.r- ~- ''a ` r/ •.'- ~GrZ~ O c , ~~ j ~• ~ ~ i ~i'5ar~n ~,• .-w ' ti: ,r^rot-~ ~~ y ' ``'?`~:, l_t x•,sa <~ ^"~, i ~,: ~,'^ r*ri ~,?•~'~ <~Od ~5 .l ~,~a7"t~ ~ r`•a. "•(. J n., a ai l _ I t ~ t ~w•". r + ~ O ~ ~~ ,~ - ~ ,~ ~r1,:a~ ``~;: ~ ~cc -~'~-~''-~,'i. c COMMON i~~' ~:'j'' '.~'' .'~ J~ ~ .,•i ''!t~~, ~. "~~~=~ , o ~ t-'r_--- ' ~~~1,>. '~~T zC .:~~". •2~.~r1 Imo- \ l..~i•• •.• -~~ : : If F~al,:~~~.~~;t ~ ZO ~~ ,l ~ !. ,tl; ~ ~ .2 ~,M AREA °~~~ ,~~ .c ~ „~~~>.~~, ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ~ r , .,~,~, ti +! PARCEL 2 t ` t ~, -'t4.t" ,y x 1. ~ ~'1"4 ~` ~~~ig ~' r~Y.} n•JY ~~ ~~a__. AREA ~i ~_ '1 ~ ^ ~' 14~F`i ` a~ ?~l-- ~ W~ t.~' ---+...~~ ~}i~` ~ ~S~f~ it . rLJ, ...- ~~t?'' j 5.5Q AC`i'1"t ~ i Y ~.: ~ ci ` ''",~ ~., ~ ~~';~ ...I ~! ~~ ~j Ems.. m ,'t~`.,1-~-=t~~- ~FS .fF01YPYr,- -. las ~~ ~._!~'- ,M^"ri~~.•~ ,/~'~'`~ t,~-i %•~1~~.~t-.y+ 1• a+ 1~~i ;,s, ,,, `~, vl~`~. \~~.~~4~~ x;~ ~{,~~~ ~ ~_. .: ~-._I ~~ i %1~ ,~'1~~. ~'~.. n,~;~~.•l; ~-~'~hr narll°f~ \t'll'}l ~ Z i ~ r; O ~~, ~ ~` '° `.35"5` ~ ~ ~ f I ~~• , •'~'`q~ "1'" ".' }a'~t~' 1 t ~4 ° '' d ~ c~ ~ l -,,',. I,~ ,. a~.~~'~' •n : i i I ii~~~;•;~I .~,~.•, ~~ . ~ _ -fir-,. ~°+`•~~! ~I ~,~ (~! $ ~ I ,,.i,,,'•. ~4 i~°c O~ ~,.~ I I ~ 1 r 4~ ~ ~:..,` rl ~¢ ~i `I~°~i ~ ~°~''~ ~!11 ~;" t 1 i II t . ~ ~ -• ! ,t -r---.^ 7 -~-• i t-~ I __.__ ~ ~ 11A„ ~~ "~' r ! 117 "-~ . I r .j~`'f'1a yllir ayE~ ~.. ~~ ~1_~1 ~ s v- - ~~ Iil .~ i ._~'li;~~ ~ ~~ r{}`- • ~ ~l i`~~~ ~` •r gt~ri C "~.:a-... Yt ~a - j~! i. , ~ `c ~~ 1 J ,3 w ~'`' ^ xsr ~:w,. ~_r ! I T~ . . a .`~' ~'~~ ~` ..rye ;.~:. sash a~.'"~"c•r,-- *`°-=-r•-=.8~ ~'r ~1'~' 1 _r _.._ ._ .. _ _ _I, _ ._ _ _ r ~ --~-_- ' ~ ~ STEVENS CHEEK BLVD ' _ ~ I~ I~ ~ ' ! ;' °'"" "~~` .:. a .I ,.lo.a amt -....- C-2 N v N_ MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN CUPERTINO, CA EAST ELEVATION 9UCE v~':rd WEST ELEVATION srxe m: rr !11 ohnsonl~raund Taisei Construction Corporation J ~~,~ ,~~,~,~ D R-7 ~. Exhibit D - ~. F~,EI+C~?~' ~. I 1 i~ i ~~~ ,i~~ ~ ._..._ ~GC~cya:w kt,Irp Mrt+~'fEl~i.t+k. ~»~.~I~'~ EXHlBlT E ~ 2 Colin Jung From: Beth Ebben on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 11:51 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: FW: The Oaks Shopping Center for your file.... ----Original Message---- From: Karleskind@aol.cam [mailto:Karleskind@aol.com] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 I1:01 AM To: mmiller@interorealestate.com; Igiefer@sbcglobal.net; rosetracy3@sbcglobal.net Cc: dkaneda@ideasi.com; City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: The Oaks Shopping Center Hello I am writing for two reasons: Why are we not being notified via a citywide notification about these meetings? It does make one wonder once again why the city would want to keep us in the dark. Projects such as this one created an uproar from residents in the past. The commission must know by now that the residents want to be informed and wish to have an opportunity to have their voices heard. 1 understand the last meeting or two were held at the exact same time as other important city meetings. One has to wonder why it was done that way. I fear this project will negatively impact this corner with regards to appearance, parking and general traffic around the park, senior center, college and shopping center. I do not agree with changing the setback which is an exception to the HEART OF THE CITY plan. Thank you Sherrie Karleskind Cupertino Resident Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cookin with Tyler Florence" on AOL Food. z~-z~a fi/10/2008 Page 1 of 1 Colin Jung From: Beth Ebben on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 11:49 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: FW: 4 Story Hotel and removal of 48 parking spaces for your file,.,. -----Original Message----- From: AJScottie@aol.com [mailto:A]Scottie@aoi.com] Sent: Sunday, June O8, 2008 11:23 AM To: rosetracy3@sbcgiobal.net; mmiller@interorealestate.com; dkaneda@ideasi.com; City of Cupertino Planning Dept. Subject: 4 Story Hotel and removal of 48 parking spaces While I am not against the hotel and mixed use building, T am against taking away 48 parking spaces on Mary Avenue. The screening is necessary but the trees should go on the hotel property, not Cupertino land. These spaces are used for events at Memorial park all year, they are used by people attending programs at the Flint Center ,they are used on Flea Markets days, they are used when the Senior Center has special events and there is not enough room in the senior parking lot, they are used by DeAnza students who cannot afford the parking permits. There will be Summer programs going on all summer. The spaces are needed for overflow parking. I cannot understand why the city is so willing to give up those spaces. Alice Ramsauer 10531 Castine Avenue Cupertino 408-738-4656 Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with Tyler Florence" on AOl_ Food. 27-z~s 5/10/2008 Exhibit: B-3 Summary of Public Testimony at June 17, 2008 City Council Meeting for The Oaks Shopping Center Project Seven residents testified at the hearing. Four of the seven thought the project was too tall or too dense and out of character with the surrounding structures. One recommended more trees to screen the building. Two were concerned with the removal of the trees, especially in light of the tree removal that took place on the De Anna College campus. Two were concerned with the noticing of the hearing and one felt the project should be continued in order to give more time for citywide noticing. Two felt the convention center should be associated with the hotel and that having a separate conference center entity was very unusual. One person felt an environmental impact report should have been prepared because people would be introduced into a hazardous environment near a freeway. One person was concerned with the possible overburdening of the surface parking lot if the underground parking lot had restricted parking. One person was concerned with breaking up the Oaks Shopping Center into separate, smaller property ownerships. Another person was concerned with the vagueness of the hotel design, which seem to be following a corporate standard, instead of a city standard. He was also disappointed in the reluctance of the applicant to commit to executing landscape improvements on Stevens Creek Boulevard and wanted to know the future plans for the shopping center. 27 - 220 EXHIBIT B Colin Jung From: Roxanne Beverstein [roxanne@c4media.comJ Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:56 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Public Hearing on the Oaks Shopping Center, Colin, I went online to the Cupertino city site to read the minutes of the 6/17/08 City Council meeting, but the minutes of that meeting are not available an the site. Please make sure that they are available for review as mentioned in your notice that ran in the Courier this week. I read the Planning commission reports and here are my comments. I have lived in Cupertino 30 years. I was involved in the modification of the General Plan in the 1980's. My husband and I have a community garden at McClellan Ranch. WE have been very active in community service to Cupertino, i.e, we have run a research project on growing vegetables organically for the University of California-Davis for over 15 years at McClellan Ranch and we have been given a lifelong achievement award by the University for our work. I am telling you this because I want you to understand that we value Cupertino and we give back to the community. We are against the building of a hotel in the Oaks Shopping Cen#er. We agree with the citizens who say that the Marriott hotel project would be unsightly. We believe that a hotel contributes nothing to the quality of life in the community and would negatively impact the quality of life for the residents by reducing the use of the Oaks property to Cupertino residents. There are better uses of the land for the betterment of Cupertino residents such as: 1. Let DeAnza college purchase the land to expand their facilities. DeAnza is a stellar institution that has been recognized nationally for their stewardship of the land. They have a sustainability requirement for the college and their presence in Cupertino adds value to the quality of life of Cupertino residence. 2. If this is not an option, I would like to see the rents in the Oaks decrease so that more tenants would come into the space. I understand in talking to former tenants #hat the rates were increased and that is why many of them left. 3. If neither of these is an option, then we would like to see a grocery store go into the Oaks. When I worked on the General Plan one of the observations made by the committee was that there are very few grocery stores in Cupertino. Aside from the ethnic grocery stores, we have only two general stores, Lucky and Whole Foods. 1 would like to see another general use store such as Safeway, Ralph's or Andronico`s come into Cupertino. We will not be able to attend the 8/5 meeting. Please register our disapproval of this project with the City Council. Roxanne Beverstein 1061 November Dr. Cupertino. Roxanne Beverstein VP Sales/Co-founder, C4Media, publisher of InfoQ.com InfoQ.com Enterprise Software Development Community InfoQ,com I InfoQ China I InfoQ Japan OfFlce: (408) 257-5939 Fax: (408} 884-2266 27 - 221 7/2S/2008 Page i of 1 Colin Jung From: C. Phillips [cephil@hotmaii.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 5:33 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: Redevelopment of the Oaks Shopping Center, Dear Cupertino City Council, I am against the current applications for redevelopment of the oaks Shopping Center. Although I recognize the need for redevelopment, the current proposal does nothing to support the "heart of the city" concept, and we certainly don't need another multi-story eyesore obstnacting views of the hills. - We can do better! C. Phillips 21890 Rucker Drive Use video conversation to talk face-to-face with Windows Live Messenger. Get started. z~ - 222 7/25/2008 Exhibit C ~ 3 cil Member Directions on Oak Shopp1ng ~-enter 6/17/ 08 City Coun Project (staff comments in italics) ent base. Evaluate whether an office{ a~ o ee { sec ~I fyou x, Qne developm p building will allow you to acsonstruct the entire pro}e til ou are in then prepare a phased condo plan, such that still need the development ph g o division for the mixed use building will not be approved un y the cond ready to build the mi E~spHASE DOES NOT WORK US HAYED ONE DEVELOPM NEITHER DOES A PHASED CONNI ON O H HOTEL AND IS APPROVAL FOR THE CONDO D PROVAL. THIS MIXED USE BUILDING AT TIME NTpROjECT A-I' A LENDER DRIVEN REQUTREM er advertisement in the Mare ublic input• (We wall be running a rcewspap 2• p r the last tzvo weeks in July. Past and present noticing cublic Cupertino Courier fo you should strongly consider hosting p a Sho in Center tenants and Gtenbrook should be paid off b fo the ~~ nn pP g outreach meet g f Apartment renters.} LSO MET WITH THE E'I• UP AN INFORMATIONAL MEETING FORTH WE HAVE S .ULY 28•I•ri• WE HAVE A • OAKS TENAN'T'S FOR j p,~Ry VENTURES AND OWNER OF GLENBIZOOKSUPPOR TFOR OUR PROJECT. .rHEy HAVE EXPRESSED loss on Mary Avenue. (At the ess than 10 spaces} to no ou au a eliminate every other parking 3• Minimal ~ we are thinking y northern hotel wing, stmt in favor of a landscape bulb Planted wath a street ee. CHED PUTTING IN FINGER ISLA LDS REVISED SITE PLAN ATTA OF ROTE TREES ALONG SECTION OF M RY A LY~ TED TO 4• FOR i LOSS OF PARKING SPACES ON M Re-review Larry Cannon's comments e d particularly the ¢. Better hotel design. ( evations that depict greater architecturhib~sah~gbf nhtooosmal to see any rs el west elevation. Previously submitted ex and our drawings uildin s, so you will need to a~ress this. Staff andy cisionm detail in the b $ have not paid as much attention to the mixed use bui ang,g will likely be conditioned with future design are more conceptual. This bualdang G THE FREEWAY TO review.) ELEVATION FACIN WILL BE WE ARE REVISING THE 4. PLAN ADD MORE DETAIL TO ~,OORS 3 AND FORTHCOMING. 27 - 223 5. Heart of the Cify landscaping improvements along whole frontage. (A majority of the Council members wanted fo see landscaping and sidewalk improvements from the westerly driveway to Mary Avenue.) WE AGREE TO IMPROVE THE SECTION DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF SHANE TO AND INCLUDING THE MAIN (EAST) DRIVEWAY. 6. No bridge improvement contribution. (Shift funds to landscaping improvements.) OK. 7, Remove and replace dead trees, including field-grown oaks for previously removed large oaks (On landscape plans, identify locations of additional dead trees, replacements with native trees, and field grown oaks.) THERE ARE 2 NEW OAKS ON THE PROERTY; THESE WERE PROBABLY THE REPLACMENT TREES. PLEASE CONFIRM. 8. Clarify office building and conference center proposal. (What type of office tenants would be aftracted to this location? How do you expecf this conference center/meeting hall to operate?) WE EXPECT QUASI-OFFICE TENANTS SUCH AS MEDICAL , DENTAL, INSURANCE USES. 9. If the underground garage is limited to hotel guests and mixed-use building tenants, explain how you will force them to use it, instead of more convenient surface parking lots? WE CAN ASK THE HOTEL TO INFORM GUESTS UPON CHECK-IN THAT THEY NEED TO PARK IN THE GARAGE AND WE CAN ALSO POST SIGNS STATING HOTEL PARKING IS IN THE GARAGE. 10. Contact the Marriott Corp. and find out their policies on sustainability for their hotel operations. THEY REFERRED US TO THE USGBC'S LEED GUIDE. THEY DO NOT HAVE THEIR OWN PROGRAM. 11. Provide computer visual simulations of the hotel and mixed use building in their site contexts. ([Ne can provide names of companies that do this type of work.) IN PROGRESS. U-2007-04f 27 - 224 PARKING REQUIREMENT: urrtsTRe=.¢r..RaxnsNlovloeo wiavACn .i urmSRweourlo ~ARIQIn iROt0D8D of oAC88 C J TOTAL 17f dtACIS . ; 0 . ~ ! • 4 6 ` t MARYtY A ,ar« a ~ t ~ ~ I I I+ L}L I ~----- •-sroRr _ --~_ X A 14m K 11 _ _ II ~_LL_ b ~~ R 19.900 . s b 4 dOW 8F ~~' ~,~ e~ ~ _ ~ 1 Y ~ + ia $ -- -- ..~~ mRErMLz .~+:••" SAW 9t a eetlr as. S. ,E ~' I , ~i! ~ ~ y / \` ~i1. .. 1- ~ i slCOS•1 0];CW1R701 R611^'Y iA6 M Al Y• M Wl _ aW YnW•-]IW a la n 4 ^ ar e.ra.a - It W e • • • n ar-aW ~e I t r ! T arr.+r rr ctir 1 !Rr t er... 8wr1 i ! s ! u t w.. W r a J >' n y I Ir..a a I ed.., f4r1 4 I. arrurralYr/rN t Yisr nL 11 uYe ti nrr s a !e a 1018 44R^•6 tII gOCES6~8LEAND REARING eIYA1R® ROOMS b/1ALL BE RROVIDEO 01 ACCOROANOE V/ITN ALLTREAMRUJLH caDe9 orTNE AVSR~~rr NAVNO AOtI50N,TOI+. nIw+9ER or ReoulReo AC(~IOIP W FATfIDOMO awu is coNFlReAEO sr TNEARCHrEOT OF REODRD FoR SAChs svECMID FRO.,ECr. AuADL~91P DuEaTROOYS MusT aff eNTOICaaRecmD RDOas AND THE TOTAL NUAI8ER 811A51ALW COMaLY MITI MARIeOTT DE^DN MID OONSTMICiIDN ORf1ErtlA e0 BTEYEe16 CRB EN 'BOULEVARD PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN ~,...~~ os ANIA cwLE08 CAIlWO t 1 !60 Ural Elraar, il• Liet ' Iaelala, Of 11l If ru:;Tnlru•esl: v Na ran e ^ r . i+6 Yarl1 ee Elraal ~ V„r•Ia, C R lle" T • Irl TI lSi• t an~arai•e rahlt rrta.ea! m ! ~ Y ~ U r °. ~' i M U ~ art 0 ~ ~ z i Q () ~ W [ T ~ ~ !i I- z v i d o Y ~ o ~ w ~ ~ z ~ i a 0 w ¢ = C] y g ~ ~ l CATS: 7-22-0e E qsj REV. NO. REV. GATE / PRELIMINARY ! SITE PLAN 1 Y X - 54 ! aaNO: SHP03 Exhibit: D-3 Sfaff Recommended Conditions of Approval for the Oaks Shopping Center Project (File Nos. U-2007-04, ASA-2007-06, TM-2007-09, EXC-200$-07, TR-2008-02, EA-2007-06) Note: Numbering of staff recommendations of conditions of approval corresponds to the numbering in the Planning Commission resolution for each planning entitlement. Where there is no staff recommendation Listed below, staff endorses the Planning Commission recommendation. Use Permit (File No. U-2007-04) and Architectural & Site AR royal (File No ASA-2007- 06 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL (additional wording) Approval is granted to construct a 4-story, u to a 122-room hotel... 3. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION (DISCOUNTED) _ The applicant shall receive a Heart of the City Area commercial development allocation up to 74,964 square feet that reflects the construction of up to a 122- roomhotel and a 56,194 square-foot mixed use building. The building area of the hotel, up to 61,822 square feet, has been discounted to 18,770 square feet of .general commercial allocation based on a peak hour traffic trip equivalency. 7c or 7(3). LANDSCAPE PLAN ...Native trees substituted for the proposed replacement trees where appropriate and feasible. The revised landscape plan shall include the location of one field-grown native oak tree that will replace one large, specimen oak that was previously removed due to hazardous conditions... 7d or 7(4) ...A net reduction of up to four (4) Mary Avenue on-street parking stalls is allowed for the purposes of creating approved driveway cuts, abutting landscape bulbs, and landscaped finger islands to screen the mass of the hotel building. The trees planted in the landscaped fingers shall be 36- inch box trees. 13. BUILDING MATERIALS AND ARCHITECTURE Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall submit revised architectural drawings, depicting mortared roof ridges, inset windows (minimum 4 inches inset); and additional balcony grills and awnings at the second and third hotel stories of the westerly (Highway 85) elevation. 14. PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS FOR HIGHWAY 85 BRIDGE deleted. 2~-2~s Exhibit: D-3 14a. HOTEL BUILDIlVG SETBACK FROM MARY AVENUE The hotel building setback from Mary Avenue shall be increased an additiona110 feet by eliminating up to eight (8} hotel rooms at the end of the hotel building where the setback on Mary Avenue is most constrained. 14b. LENGTH OF HOTEL STAY Hotel stays shall be limited to a term of less than 30 days per booking. Tentative Map (File No. TM-2007-09} Condition #4 renumbered to #4a. 4b. MODIFICATION OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND CONDOMINIUM PLAN The tentative parcel map {Sheet TM-2) shall be redrawn to retain the mixed use building footprint within Parcel 2 (existing shopping center parcel). The condominium plans (Sheet C-1, pages 1 & 2} shall be revised to indicate that condominium lots 2 and 4 shall also be phased and not approved by the City until Phase 2 development proceeds. Phase 2 development will be evidenced by the payment of a $500,000 surety to the City against future nonperformance. The City Attorney shall review and approved the form of that surety. Tree Removal {File No. TR-2008-02) 4. TREE REPLACEMENTS The applicant shall prepare a revised landscape plan at the building permit stage. The westerly landscape strip next to the proposed mixed use building will be advanced to the phase 1 work. Native trees shall be substituted for the proposed replacement trees where appropriate and feasible. The revised landscape plan shall include the locations of one field-grown native oak tree that will replace one large specimen oak that was previously removed due to hazardous conditions and root barriers shall be installed to avoid conflicts with future phase 2 development. The revised plan shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. For any additional trees that are removed due to hazardous conditions or are considered dead, the applicant shall be required to replace these trees in accordance with the Protected Trees Ordinance. Species and size of replacement trees shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department. z~ - 2z~ I. STEVEN S CREEK BOULEVARD CUPERTINO CA SenicleOlllce: 580 Flnl Slreet, Sla BQ01 Senleh, CA BI810 Tel: (7071 TI8.OBOt V411eIe Olllce: 818 Merin Slreet Valle)o, CA D1630 Tel: (707)688.1111 - erc®erolncerchltecle.eom ~ h~• ~ n M W `~~ ` ° ~, U 3 j w W W r ~ 0 U - # "~t . ' '^^ V! n. e `~: w z ~ fl _ ~ ° _ -;-8 w ~ <, . ~ ~ o r a a ~ 3 O w x _ _ ~? ~ H = U ,,~ .. .. _N. ,. .:. .... __ I JI I I I i VICINITY MAP OWNER ARCHITECT DRAWING INDEX i DAB. S-3o'D~ ..~ -~~-~ I II i --= '" P ~-~ = °' yI~ JE ,{" ~,~ T ARCHRECTURAL CML REV. N0. REV. DATE ~ ~a `°0A R ~,, Ir ' I e 1iT ' - E ~,5, - SUNNYVALE HOLDING, LLC ARC Inc. ARCHITECTS oa-t oR-z ~RSH~r ST7EPLAN PLLAGE •t: ,ENr"T "EM"e y-zo-o~ ~ ^ReQ - ( I ~I - ~ ~ '~. ~ ' I ~` CIO SAND HILL PROPERTY 560 FIRST STREET, SUITEB-2D1 oR-z.t PItA4E-73TTEPIMI C-t TITLESHtFT TM•1 TITLE SHEET ) 8 01-31-DR r y I ~; ~ x ! ~ ~wq a ga „d 489 S. EL GAMING REAL BENICIA, CA 94510 oR•3 DR•3 1 FLOOR PLANS PHASE•1TtASEMENr FLOOR PIAN c•z C 3 GENERAL NOTES NOTES JD TM•2 IMP SHEET 9 02-04-08 I ~,wr,na ~ - ~~= s -= ~ - d 1 •S -~~. SAN MATED, CA 94402 TEL: (707)I45.O502 . DR•4 RETAILICONVENTION ELEVATIONS • C•4 AND LEGB IXISTNGCONDRION TM•9 TM•4 FHELIA4NARY GFIADNGd DRAINAGE PLAN PRELIMNARY UfIL.Ity PLAN 03-28-OS _ ,g, T; s.emwa~l 1 - ' !~ + ~ ~- ¢- I r ~ 'r TEL: 65D•344-1500 FAX: 1D7 745-059Z { ~ DR-5 HOlfl FIRST FL00R PLAN U ~ O C-5 OEMOLRION PLAN ~ ~ CO P ~ , I [reek sbe [ulerMno FAX: 65044-0652 DR•T HOTEL E~BN 'E ST ELE A110N3 C-7 urll rtv ~ NDO FlRST ROaR Q~ ~ _ - I I ,Il --- i { f I I - - ~ DR-B D HOTEL NOTTTH630UTH ELEVATIONS HO L CO OR P~E C-S OE'TARS C•2 ShREMENf c II-: ~" 11 G n = utlb We I ~- Id ~bi_ I~" SD W CIy MA TE i#, ~~ ~~~ , I ~° ~ g ~ . R - SUBMITTED TO SUBMITTED FOR . GD-z S R PIrW FHlSE•,DEMOLRpNPLAN PFiABE -2: C.3 CO D , NPLNNCE D3DOAPLIAN COVER SHEET I ~ ' ~~ . ~~ I - ~ y' ~~ ~:' _ . CEEXFt6R pr d _~~~3 ~ , ,.'~'~_. .=, 'Oeonbe 16= , I ~£ ~ _ '+ . a BUILDING ALTERATION-24HWRFRNESS C•Z C-3 GENHiAL NOTES NOTES ANO LEGEI LANDSC APE F e I _ _ ftl .A ~~ CS ~ t COVER SHEET C 4 m E un wy I ' 2 Q' 4 8 A-1 OEAgLRION 8 80011 PLAN - C •5 XISTING CDNORION OEMOLRION PLAN L- t L • 1 CONCEPNAL LANOSCME LEGENDS CONCEPTUAL l ~g'~-~ -e 1 I ~ _ -'_ ~' ~ b N a~-~ ~', I ~ ~m«~ g-li ~ CITY OFCUPERTINO P DESIGN REVIEW RESUBMITTAL A-z A•3 RooFPLAN ELEVATIONBWALL SECTION6 c-5 C•T GRADING PLAN MLfIY PLAN L•3 L 4 ANO3CME FLAN (NORTH) CONCEPfWLLANOSCAPE PLAN (so1JiF1) CO PN C DR ' 1 ,,,, e- or ~,~„ - ff I N LANNING DEPARTMENT APRIL 2(106 A • 4 DETAILS C -S DETAILS - L • 8 E N AL LANDSGPE PLAN PFNSEI(NORTH) CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN PFi49E t SOUT ~ I D 4 . I I' ' ~ P L_~ ~ ~,- ( FI) 5 ~oere iL ~ ~ -_--wmeenlgr , I _d__, nv.. SHf1 uTA/uSMLANOTITLESURVEr JOBNO.: SHPD9 PARKING REQUIREMENT: OFFSTREETPARKINGPR~VIDED 3D5SPACES `~- UNDERGRWNDPARKINGPROVIDED 16SSPACES ~~,. TOTAL 470 SPACES i ~~:' 1 ~. \_ ~~ l t 1 .~, ~, `~ .~, ~d"k C ~ •.' O .•c Z , ''.. 0110 1 HOTEL 122 UNITS 'r 4•STDRY ~:'~. FooT9+FUrrt: a 1 t 73,155 SF. Torsi AREA 61,877 S.F. ,1 t 9 '~~ ~ . PID WRIE6MAlIE ( IsiaAmsrl- roeeoeear .. 1 3STORY RETAdI 2 OFFICEI O CONVENTION 2 CENTER '.. y FOO7Fti1M: < 19A685F. 6 TOTU ARFX w 1 '~. SB,IW S.F. `~ \\• /1 N PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN A SCALE:1'=4D'-0' rtvr `'' .,.''~ / MAR` aarem slar~ l ~ - n ,~ y. .. I '+ `~~ I i 1 4 1 - -_- L 14y b ow HOTEL GUESTROOM UNIT MIX; DODE1 • B OIFDWRPOOL CUE37R1W lYP6 1d infi Yd IU 54do 9lmdmd - 191od 15 IS 15 15 Studo 5lodsa - 71 foot 0 4 A 4 54do • II lad (xaeorble hqo( 1 2 1 7 Shdo Stondad d Ydae Carr 1 1 1 1 ~~ X160 ~ 1 Bedoom Stodod 7 J 3 3 1 Bedaom Fna 3 7 3 7 F'era~loge/fdd 1 Bodaam 19i 2 Behodn Baonded 4 4 4 S Nrteaego/fdd 2 Bodraom tai Tilde Pr Floor M 32 3! Il 1091E faIFS1R1816 ACCESSIBLE AND HEARMG IMPAIRED ROOMS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL THE APPLICABLE CODES OF THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. NUMBER OF REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE GUESTROOMS SHALL BE CONFlRMED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD FOR EACH SPECIFIC PROJECT. ALL ACCESSIBLE GUESTROOMS MUST BE INTERCONNECTING ROOMS AND THE TOTAL NUMBER SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH MARRIOTTDESIGNANDCONSTRUCTIONCRITERIA / \~~` •. ,; ~ ,yyx~Y. 1 I Imo' • ~ . ~ ~~ ..' l ,, .:~ :.• .r. ~~ ) 7~ r• ~ )~Y v I I I PoR11Rl0F1111-Pa i~ ~ y T~ '~'~~,~^> , X '. I m oao E RETAIL 4 I B,ODD SF 4 j E~,] RETAIL 3 4 ~ fl 9,587 S.F L-;-- . E RETAIL2 ~ ~° ' I . ~..~ ~.. e, ~.... ~. e~:...r. ~...a.. ~ 5,BODS.F 9 9 X1 4 S ., 6 4 ~CT~ C1 F 0 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD ~~~~ DE ANZA COLLEGE CAMPUS Benicia Office: 566 Flret Street,S ln B~Ot I Benicia, CA 84510 Tel: (7fi1 T15~9507 I I Velleia Office ~. 616 Ilerln Slreet Vallejo, CA 81690 Tel: (70T~566~11 n arc~ercincuchitecte.cam J CO U w W W ~ I 0 U ~ a z ~ W ~ i W r H U X_ otS ~ Q Y } Z_ Q ~ Q ~ ~ O W C7 U H 2 DAB: 5-3D-07 REV. NO. REV. DATE 9-20-07 i 9 D1-31-08 e 02-04-08 03-28-08 a 04-04-08 6 8 PRELIMINARY l SITE PLAN ~ a tl DR-2 JoB No.: SHP03 r-----~ NEw ~ ~--, ' ~ocArIDN DF I i I~UNDERGROUND j `--~ i TRANSFORMFR i ~ Beniela Olllee: 5e0 Flnt 81net, Sta 6701 Benlcla, CA BI510 Tel: (707(T15~0507 Vdldo Ol11ce: 010 Yuin &tnet Vdle~o, CA B15B0 Td: (707(5581111 utOuelncereBitatte.tom J m : ~ BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE:1' ~ 2Q'-0' U W w W O ~ ~ U a ~ w Z to > w w ~ ¢ X_ ~tf U ~ a'no O cn ~ z Y ¢ ~ ~ = W F 2 U ~ DATE: 5.30-07 ~ REV. N0. REV. DATE 9-20-07 01-31-OB 02-OhDB FLOOR PLANS ::GROUND FLOOR PLAN scuE:1' • 2D'-0' ::SECOND FLOOR PLAN scALE:1' = 20'-0' ::THIRD FLOOR PLAN 3CALE: ,• • 7aa DR-3 aaeNO.: SHP03 Benlele Ollice: fi10 Flnt Blrut, Bte. 8801 Benlde, CA IA 610 Tel: (707(716.0602 Vdlelo Ol11ce: 111 Mvin Btnet Vdlelo, CA 11510 Tel: (707~fifi1•1111 ercQerclncuohllecU.oem J m sTRUCTURAL 1WOCK-0UT' PANELS LocAnoN DF c~> TRANSFORMER ~.; U w w w O ~ ~ U n. ~ w Z r ~ X_ otf U ~ ago O ~ } Z Q a ~ ~ ~ w 2 ~ = U 3 a 1 F ,y6 1 6 pe Y W ~ ~ BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1' = 20'-0' ~~ 5.30-07 1 e REV. N0. REY. DATE 9-2D-07 c 01-31-OB 02-04-08 03-28-08 Go PHASE•1 BASEMENT ~ FLOOR PLAN DR-3.1 ~oseo.: SHP03 ~.'; III~'t.. ti<mC -10Nm ' o ~ ~ ~ o `° °° ~ ~ THE OAKS MIXED-USE PROJECT ~ ~ = o ~ = o ., ~ o ^/n N ° ~ ° ~, ~ ~ ~ ° N s ~ ~ y, HIGHWAY 85 & STEVENS CREEK BLVD _~ r W ~ Z ~' N ~ O ~ W W p b ~ ~ ~ CUPERTINO, CA o m N e ~ ~ 3 ~ `~ `~~ ~N~ -~„" - ^ ~ ~!l,~io -a~o~~~~nc,~~l~~m~~~~~~~~; ~.a ~ , ,.-v `~I A ,~.> SITE PLAN FABRIC AWNING SUNBRELA -ARMADA CITRUS 4978-0000 RT-1 ROOF TILES: USTtLE P_1 PAINT: FRAZEE P_2 PAINT: FRAZEE RUSTIC MEDERA BLEND CL 2741 W - ALCAZAR BROWN CL 2741 W - BISCOTTI P-3 PAINT: FRAZEE P_4 PAINT: FRAZEE P_5 PAINT: FRAZEE CL1504M -RODEO CL 1556A -CORKSCREW 8296N -TREASURE CHEST M-1 METAL STARE FRONT AEP SPAN -COOL DARK BRONZE i i i~ vniw ~~~~n~v-vvL r l\VJLI~ I® HIGHWAY 85 & STEVENS CREEK BLVD, CUPERTINO, CA MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN CUPERTINO, CA 111 Join Br~una Taisei Construction Corporation DB61CN C900P, DIG PAone 208.7889300 D R-5 ~.,~.~ -----'~ FIRST FLOOR PLAN NOR1H SCALE 32':1'-0' MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN CUPERTINO, CA 111 Johnson Braund ~~.~~ ~~., ,~.,~ Taisei Construction Corporation DR-6 MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN m~ Johnson Braund DE61CN C90UP, DJG EAST ELEVATION scALE air : r-0• WEST ELEVATION SCALE 3!32':1'-fY Taisei Construction Corporation CUPERTINO, CA ~~,~.~~ DR-7 ~.,~.~ NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 3132': T-0' SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 3I~2':1'-0' MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN CUPERTINO, CA 1Jl JohnsonBraund Taisei Construction Corporation DESIGN G60UP, ING Phcne 206.,66.8300 D R-8 ~.,~~m MARRIOTT RESIDENCE INN CUPERTINO, CA 111 -rr~e.~ Johnson Braund D67CNC60DP,ING zD~.,~~ Taisei Construction Corporation DR-9 COLORS AND MATERIAL PALETTE x 0 s f D a ~~ DEMOLITION SITE PLAN N SCALE: 1' • as SHEET NOTES ^t mrPrEmr 1WNm[ (E) 1XFATFR euDac.(Pr1A6E , mwnaN) wait (E) aaDrc w m DnEwc Wu~ a mr6s aNm1 2 (PHASE 2 mramw) EixANSroalw m eE x¢ncAtm, arrwAClax To 1E rSI PGE .,, ~~~ ~ , >r~Y{ '' ~ t~A i : w Y{ y~ t1; ~ 1 ~r?4~ 6i4 ~, ~ 5 2~ f0. R . fi~.xrt~.,.,, rt ~` ~ ~ } ~ ~ I~i.~: • ; 3 ~~~i YI # I~ , ~~ 3 ~ M ,; ~ T }~ ati. .: I Si s. I Y ~; iR ~~ ~ ~; r . , yy~~'' ~qV,~~~~ / 2 ~~ :, ~:~ aaxe erooc eueow BUIQLD~ING VW 0 ~~ I axe eua eneDNo n,rm s BUILDING ooxe ~ ~ ~ BUILDING 300 n STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD u lesm ro AxD aamaAlE r1N caxerxTNVrs wArNOS No sPEwlcATaxs Yw SPECFIC roxxrnw AECUIIENENIS Pw CweuTANYS eDac e) PENFLIY WE oENDUnw a THE E7DSirD Slaltilee: r1x aeAT CAai A1n rlx aeAtE tools x aaEn Nor ro EoPA1m~ smucruwE No EONWEXT nur o ro 9te1Nx ~ 1FiEW rerraArta xo~nrr ~"~roae~ uo ®nxx~WrTfEWrTN nc wtxax¢Anw geD9 m NENOW11c WENffIa D) xf110iE DEIIOII110N aE16 NDIm COIPIEIFLY 70 111E BAg NAIEPoNS DFYOllllw NCLUOFS CUfIIND eAIX W CENIMCS, WALL$ FlCDA4, AND aNI51E5 AS AEgAAED iD 11E E1rIFNT 1XAT NSTAfU110N DP NEW Wpef CAN BE ACMPllelm. aamrAtE eenl w1Wn wASelcS Ew a1E EtfIFNr a NEW woac ~~N ti~ 8 BUILDING 200 GENERAL NOTES q aEAx 91NFAD 5 xEYA-IC E1POSm Ar7FA DOeMldr eaN m YA1w ErSIe1C ADJA(F11T SLaPAaS w PIePAa: fw NEW NOeL h nWF~NwiorLLEnc~iEO~mr r"xneNixEC~ w~rY, µD usE tNE nEPONr m DEtw-t wea >x¢s sxAU eE uNm No clew EtwL ec xENaEn. °~,~~ 9~ ff Fro11ID`DfMM'Tr[ AdO A ~igNS u wts Paw To uNanw. EXISTING PARKING = 499 SPACES PHASE-1 THEATRE DEMOLITION = 15,263 S.F. STALLS TO BEDEMOLISHED = 213 SPACES PHASE•2 TOFU HOUSE DEMOLITION = 2,650 S.F. STALLS TO BE DEMOLISHED = 107 SPACES 0 c 0 0 D ae aram we s.aN euplc ranee s BUILDING 100 r-. ~.,;.. LEGEND DFYdIeN (F) SIAUCME e1CANDNC CDrrCNEIE SEAd SFE CFNEAAL xarE c 61MT4 E7aSANC ASPIIKT, SIDEWNI( pIIB, PAxaNC IJ1T UCN1S AND 1Axoscwao wtxN niE s1AOm NeA Ale) AS NEWaFD ro ACCplxmAiE NEW rnslaurnw AMD S1E nmc, SEE aAw PLW Pp1 F7lIENT OF NEW DwSiRUCix1N. egb 4 9 b Benlcb Ofllce: 660 Plnt Blnel, Slx B901 ~' Bennie, cA 916tD ~ Tel: (70T) T/6.0602 Vdlelo 011nc 018 Merle sleet Vdlela, CA 91690 Tel: (701)656.7111 uc@erclncuehllecU.eon D 0 mgt w~ w0~ F ~ V J ~ J w Z ~ ~ Q~w ~ C71~WZ~ 0 ? ~ J=' a~ N m N N U e i I DATE: $-x-07 ~ K REV. N0. REV. DATE n~-ta_na s DEMOLITION 9 MASTER ~ SITE PLAN N SD-1 ~ roe No.: SHP03 ao ~. ~ ~~ ~ _ tlMHO1H ~ m 99 A ~~ ~ O ;` ~ . ; ~ ~ ~ ~ m ` ~" y.: ~ ~ ~ ~ <. ~~ , ~,~. ~~ ~~~ d r g w - .~y a, ~ ;~ . z. i h3 1 h ~ ~ - `"l 1 ~ ~~ ` ,~ k ~ : ~ ~ L ~ ~ f . . fir: i `:,i, f £S I,.:f ~n ~p1~g ~~~ ~~a 3fi ~~ a~ ~ ~ f ' ~ T <I~~s` j ~ fr t't~sr ,~/ ~ ~# { ~ F 9 z 4 ~ ~~` i.' s ''° . ~ 'F~ ~~ * f _ z ~ y y ~ ~ a t"~'"' uuu~~l f' 1141 sg35d; . . ~~ ~ 8 6 ~~~ 9 _~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,j f ~ ~ g~ , ,h ~ a ~ ~~~~-,., :, m •_ ~~ ,;tl ~, o a~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ p rn ~ ~ m ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ 4 ~~ 0 ~ ~ ~~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ O Z c ~ 0 m 0o v m ~ '' ~~ ~~>. o u m v m ~ O r `'~ '-. 3 '~~ ~, m Z v ~ Ao 0 n N ~ W u ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~e ~ ~ ` ~] m ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ;, `~ ~~ m ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ v ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~s ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ € ~g ~ ~ ~~~ "' _ ~ ~ ~ ~ BUILDING ALTERATION ~ti<mi ~mPs ° ~~: = -~ -= ~ ~ m ~ 24 HOUR FITNESS ., . - ^'~~ ~~°'~ A ~ ~ _ ~ N ~ ° Z o ~ °D ~ ~ 21271 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. _ No! ~ ;e_ ~ CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ~ 3 IVIIIOII !12 VI6 TH LM~10 MO ffOA1110R 1! IpACkD A M 4AlIIL PIIl4'1!F M MI M IpC MIplE0. 4-YI 01 ^Plmll.'All AIIf/ IE1M4 F ME U M ~IIR. 6 MOAl1A. Alf A ON~R NO lfOGIp6 MIYC ML OpOq RK /IO NOWIgI IAIM6 SIN MC NC AWl mfllLl ~N MB W~Ig NO 9f6GA16 W611111R AM flli RmA:6 M /@1IMQ R )Q 16111CII06 ~ 4~ ,'J ,a~ f ~ f !~ f~ ] ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~{~ yy ir~i ~~BiR '$~ ~ I ~ 1 f~ ~~~~ _~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ y `m ~~~ ~ ~ ~o ~~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ m ~ n ~ ~~ '~~ .~ z ~ ~ g ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ D m m t-'' ~. - ~- ~ ~~fi~ L ~ 'I~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ > z t s :~ ~ i o,ti;~~ ~ ~ !r ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ _ ~~ ~~ ~~~~N~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Z m ~-"" 4 ~ P~ '~ ~ ~ ~ Ly ~ Rg ~ N ~ T1 N siA Lq yr ~ t~ ~ ~ fpi ~ pg ~ ~~~ ~ if~ •I'V~^ V/ ~ Y P f !+ N e p p V f Y N 8V L ` ' ` 6 3 ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ er ~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~~ Te ~ ~ ~F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ N 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ g ~ ~ ~~ ~ €~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ P~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ N ~ ~~~~~~ ~~g ~ t ~€€ ~ ~ ~ n ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ g m ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ m ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ €~~ ~ ~~ ~ . m ~ N O ~ ~~~ ~ ~ D m ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~€ ~ ~~ ~ Z ~~~~ ~ D ~ O ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~I"~~ ~;~~~~ 0 m ^ `J V z ~~ ~ ~ ~ g~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - rn O > ~~~g ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ v rn C ~~~~~~~~~ ~o rn z ~ ~ ~n Fy.'$~~~Q~y~ Fy.~~~~m Fy.~~ ~~ F~.~y~~~° t~~gi~ ~II~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~I~~R3o ~~~P~~ ~~P~~ ~~4 ~Z ~~~~~€€ .`~S~~P~ S'n~PF~i I k.P ~ ~ 4" ~ rt o t ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ T > T - ~ - E ~ R S 8 L ~~ J Q > ~ s ~ 7R ~ 8 z - ~ ~~ ~~F7 z ~~ ~ g ~ $ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ _ ~ ~ p ~ czi ~ ~ ~ Y Z ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ rn 1 ~ 1 z z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Cn D O 0 ~ O ~ O r ~ _ ~~~e~ F7.g Ew F7.~g~ y ~-~t~ F~.§~~P'-~ F7.~+~ c F~. 7'c F~.~~~P~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ o ~7 +p ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ m z ~~ Z ~ o ~~~i~ y~~ E~~ ~°~° n ~~ ~i~ ~o~ m g ~ "~ m ~~~~ v Y,< ~ ~sb~0 T$~;g~ ~~>~ ~e'~~ ~°'Lm O ~ ~ P~ m > m 3 ~ S ~~'<r~,7a, ~ ~ ~ v~ T w y ? y w ('~ ~~'~'~'+~' ~ ~ L+n;i; ;p 4 N W +GbCO~ ~ m c ~~~pQ„4 ~~Qv sfizm C1 Lh~ s m ccz o ~ ~~g~~~ ~ ~z~~ ~ ~ O m z ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ m D r ~ Z ~ ~ m ~ X 8 a ~ ~,~ ~ m ~ > ~ BUILDING ALTERATION .=. o.~mW~ ° ~~ : o = y _ ~ ~ ~ D 24 HOUR FITNESS - V"' ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° b 21271 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. - _ o ~ a CUPERTINO CALIFORNIA ~ oneort em¢ u e v tex eurtm w aiac noe a es nco n n [ eew e Boar sc ra s ex qtr e¢ emun ewa a enmeui rt xe r:am a eoc a e rea a oeam wnc a eeu ~ eo emrawoe ~uioe lu uofea sus eo emwea enee eM •c ec aw swan ee w¢ eaeim e e seaaioe aeennn~ new Ewa nma a w<raatea a ~¢ esneiee ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~; ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~~~ ~l I ~ ~tuj ~ y i • ~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ F ~~ V/ 2 m m -~ z a ,~ O ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~I+e ~~ ~~ ~ p-- 11 ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ m ~ '~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ rD, Z ~ e ~~ ~~ ~~ I ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~~ ~ €~ yyy ~ I 4 I € ~ g~ ~ ~ ~ I I p I ~ I _ I ~ ' . I I I u I I n 1 I II II ii 1 I I I I I I ~~$ € ~ z 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I I I ~~ ~ 1 1 I yO I - Q I r I 1 I I 1 ~' I e I ^ ~ I 1 I I 1 I I i I I i I I I I I i I I I I I I _ 1 I I I I I I I 1 _---- 8 ~m o a o~ ~~ = ~ _ ~ _~ ~ ~° ~ W ~ o ~z b tv~ar Yoi¢ Qe uz a ne our xo aaa e~vs a m c~m n n [ aw ~ ia nm V a s4 m i Mw xr a •mrm aarx a v~mueui n wr amm x Q~ W I -~ _~ I 1 _ p I I 7 I I I I I 1 I I N I - - I I I I 7 1 I I I ---t--- I 1 I I I I - ~~ -~ I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I m - 1 - --V I I I I I I I \ I' I ---~-- ~ --~--- - I ; ----`o, I I I I I o I I I I I 1 1 -- --t---- - '; ---0 I I ~ I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I i n I I I I I I I I - - 1 - V I I - - i ~ 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I ~ I I II I I 1 I I 1 1 a I I I I I i I I I 1 1 _ _ _ I I I I ~ ti<P<timPm BUILDING ALTERATION e:= ~~ 24 HOUR FITNESS u'~s ''== 21271 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. ~ N ~ ~ .~ CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 3 I I I I I I ~~~C ~ ~~ @ @ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ o o a o ~ _ w N ammr e~ u[ a wa mwoe eo otvrateo a nuca 7C I i~ i~ I': ]~ I ~ i n 2 m Z O m iZ ~ O ~O Z §~ O Z m ~ ' 0 b ee6f ][ IU MI la R I I I I I I I I I ~____ ~ _ I I I I I I I I I I 1 I - _ ~ _ _ ~ _I _ - V I . _ _ I I _ ~ _ I _ _ ~ I I I I a: P= ~-ImW Ot BUILDING ALTERATION ®_e== ~-__ ~,>~= ~> 24 HOUR FITNESS -`°' ~ V°^_~ 21271 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. ~ ~ R H CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 3 ~_ en anm ~ oo[ a ~ wtt a enam mu m aus soamr woe rnlos ru ®s w xo wawna lace nx Mc rc ~ mn~n ~x n¢ oust s stmsos mmnu[ rwx raa m ---0 -~ ---~ ---Q ---~ -~ ---~ ---~ --~ ---~ e wQ esw¢woic 3.1 4 SICNAGE BY OTHERS I I p 0 S T U V I 3 ~ r.a PAPAACr IwtDNpp • MATCH O() ~ (E) PITCH ~ I N HORZONTALI S161NG w/ 15~ ~LDG. PAPER- t2 ~-.- .- ..----- TO MATCH (E) t/-S~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~ - I -- - SIGNAGE _ - - ~~ ~"" 'g -.......-......-...._........._ ...... ..........._-....-_..__: --------:::::r.:.... /-2v I ISSION TILE ROOFlNG TG MATDH (E, STriE AND ¢IOI.OR I I A-, L t 6 4 ~ '. '. ~ enlele Orflee: SBB Plrel Blreel,Bt! B7BI Bwitle, CA 11510 Td: X701(115-0507 VdlelD Office: ,.,..-. TOP.OF„BM,.,. S'-0~ T.O.C. MATCH (E) HT. I'~,, '~,; ....................................._..-. .:::::::.::::::::_:::::::::-: -..._...--'----..............-..... ~'~==.°r..".".'-'~. -....---------rrrrrr-r :_:=-__:=:::::::_~ ~-- "" ~ ~ I ~ ' I ~ ~~-~~~ - -~- ,,, - GUTTER da FASCIA TO HATCH (E) DETAIL I I i 't7 7 010 Mwrln Slrnt Velle(D, CA BISBO TeL (IOT(SBB~1111 uc0uelaeuchlucte.cem i ~~ I I ~ .-... - . : AND HEIGHT I F.F. - - , - - - --- ------- - -------. ..------ - ' -- ------- - ---- - - - - 1 ' I GAS METER I E(~LECTRICAL SWITCH GEAR I FlRE RISER ADdA~~ SIDNG I I I ;: ,7 ~,; „ ~ O m Q r- I --~ ~ s w~Tpl~ ~~~ I ~. I r I.I.I WEST ELEVATION 2 scuE:lre•=ra D ~µNT~OP/ 1Rp~~1mGA RYNUDO /r 7mAAG w/ Ye WN75 U PG BAVj to uP (E) wAU m AalE~c s x tt ADOE mar s tr 71m'e ! x• a.a i A-, I I ~ I I „ `I B ~ ~ ~ I ', n '^~J I '~~ I A_, I B 4 = I, ~ I ~ I ~~, I', !I i ------------------- s ~ ~ W O ~ ~ J W Z U Z (a7~j0 ~J W (~ ~ ~ NL Q ~ N LL J O_ ~ W f` ~ N m N N U ~ 9m vASaw- ,r n-n worn ttoxa rn. ' I ''' '' IB '- 10 QD1P 0Dk7% ro ^wn is I r- - - I _"I caxe sue ro rmrriy t7• ~r,mN fq(r~nun ruu _--_.------ - Is A"` i _...-..-.- ._.._.._.........._-..._ ................__.........._.... _......... I e L - - - J su stAUCnmu sctNRa TEMP. ENCLOSURE E UTILITIES" 3 SGALE:,17•,'-0' ~ WALL SECTION sGALE:,n•.,'~ SHEET NOTES GENERAL NOTES °"~~ ~~-o~ REV. N0. REV. DATE ~ iF M•CRMY wATERPRODf FNCLD911RE fai (E) UR11E5 (DAS ! aECImC) ~1 E%iWOR YAIFAAL 9NAL NATCX E7051ND NDI®NTAL wDOD 16 A-I/ eATr MISUUTMNL mR-NG PAPE0. 15 - ro 6E USfD wn iMFY CAN BE REI.OCAlE1t. 2 9aND 01RA - (EI ROOFNC AND flUYNC ro AalAwl 17 7x FIRE ArnuWC DeN. ttl O.C) 7 CSY FLIANMC CIP AT PARAPET wALL 4 (N) 7,6 SAAS • 16' 0.C SS0. ., s (0 wAU ro rxNAx e ntwoco stAAtrwc ./ srAA xAUrc PEx snarcnmAt waE ca"^iranars Aoanc - T11A: uu caOR ro NATaI (0 ~ DErA< Ar cuuw ro wTa Iq. ELEVATIONS 81 WALL SECTIONS Q raRNEO axcaE>E catAm ro wroN (E? to (q sAe ro RwrrE n m mASwrc t7 euu w Romrc Ar PAAAPEf. A ^ 3 u (x) rootxc PEA s^A:nWU. 14 (N) AODF iRAIeNC PFR SiMIC1URAL PAM ro NATCII F1e511ND. ,s (NJ wrt soEwArx IwiCX (EI)IaDPE 7x rAw WALL JOB NO.: SHP03 ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~' O Dm "' ....._ ~ "~ o ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ D °z ~ n ~ ~ o v v m r C g d'• ~~ ~~ ~r i TQS~ 9$ ~B 8 ~, ~ ~q ~ ~ ~,~ ~ ~~ Bx N ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ w a 9 /~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O > ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~w ~ O~ ~ ~ ~st ~~~~ 9~ ~ ~ ~~ iy]~ L . W ~ ~ r ~ Q m 5` ~ a~ ~~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ L_ _ p z v ~ 4' ~ ` r ` r` ~~ O O l, ~• ~~x _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ = ~ m ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ °F ~ " § ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ z ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ m ~ ~~ € y m ~~~ D ~ ~ D r ;; . ~ - - - _.... ;~ 1 s. ~ ~ ~~ ~ e ~~~~ ~_ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ o ~ ~ o ~ o n ~ o o ~ BUILDING ALTERATION . ~<m<~m~m a =e T , ~ i ~ 24 HOUR FITNESS N>~~ ~> V°' ~ ~°~ ~ ~ - ~ o W ~ ~ b 21271 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. - e~ ± o .. ~~ ~a~~.~ ,.~ .~ ... _... __ ~ ._~ ._~ _..._.. ~-~--- ----------- - - CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ~ 9 Lu ememlla0pn7N1a®ur<I IB6MlIgIB 1 R91 eo nlL IIpN r01 NMWE T ? M PAFIINIIIP D11E 1®011 rv rlnr IWGN OINNJO M DNAME flNFxO: 6 FATN ND.IM IoNI, NROM NlIIIMR CNNMT Ol'01 MQ XCFIMtll1-!I Gm0 V~N0111, 'Mp{ !T nMS1111L'1NI Q NWI! N!OIId6 NIM N3N1 Y]IIIf ISILOBP~IIOA ~/ IeY~'YCI0~0 AC ~ AVMLL/ONtln![ T.JO >) OAINIIe G>DION 1EI1 Im1011! e1N1ND) ORA110 M OOd71ML flN01R 6 N:Rllr lllnT 01 MtYNII CONIIIIL'INI 01 VNA lNn 6 ONOIN°I CIt' GNf 1EIE16d O GAN TINY 1) /111IINr9 ANIIIS NJI ml q W BIDIm) KIl INRFnY N1YAIED N M On D dNNl14 OOInY A• FVY PAOM W I Nft'K 0 NEE'lllt IM !) A1DiRla NOITS Pa RI! G Jm B+N1m) DINn4D M 0e'D1MF flnF110: 6 >R NOn 0nD A9 A bm WIE SWIA OMN, nAm Q WO"M DRONIO K rDn014 lSm AAM9IIL' SWM 0.MNN ME ' •~ R ~ d GR 6 °.1m ~ !)1(1VI AIp VNIO LANImi rel 1101 01 ttl Q10T1a1 rl Pss[ Gsoort ra w a n INm~ml OIAP, AIP A NMINN L11NfiL r w a ~a~a rm t~oxtwniT. m 'mc s v ~ i PT~a¢ a 1T d n rw ~ 3 ) g ' Nis M mnsxa uo iucAna a Iu anon na aa c/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E~'~ ~ M , YNfA GW WNIY KL'AS ~SL1E J5 M rosraolGn wLr 6 ~' ~p°'!^1p^!~^G' $ aY orNClo1 ara Nor N ~ A WMIF JVlel IHf mIMOeNONNA710N M mNN wlnNAnox W NnMm n M Nrv a 111O G VNOry ![1 PINEO el T. n E PpI~FflIA 1Y M SID N pd?nN n4fON1 M 1ANNNAnND Mm NOxls NNNND rv r mNaJ1l01 m nE mr a [INUIiN t ll n b n• 7 vloc t°gIS[ ~ pm1AN1 r1R MMM uwnElsapr IY A4ldr ~~ NANNN oniM11u1r Au IpD rASAOerrs wtom NRQN wooGS Nor M PEONw RYA0011! V NfA~AW Pm1YAnnl! UI~ OIEIIYnE 9pM , smltsnN a eu m Inw1o11 Gm MMWIY Jt tlm. N'2!lNfD NNgI n. tm N C QB" D IIE MCVN F ~ 1 W 1dR A101E 0.MNNINF G 100( m! 6 tligK IfiODI. r!Q! M9 SRV SINr IIINN 0LW-NI %01 Nk ]K-n-09 M M0K 0000 NIWONY n M GIE Af OEfaINm N M 1 i7 89 ®s" sANUAr sm NMINIr 1F1 poem-m NiN~/NMONlOIN0010 IYM. nu spat w xo-vas-r wtm sumo n. xo! n Ner NNIYII „^I Ie1N112 ~'^'^. CU P E R TI N O o ~ 7. ~ pe N ;~ ~, NIQN MK LIF. I Nnw1110! AMMO 0E1°Ollpr £n101A IIIA MN NIAI! XWR AI[ SR rv 6 YIAY A1FNE Nlm K SOYM NTt'!' [ASI, A! BYJIN ON ML 1FANIFInn MIF NAN iK PIN001 N>I.NOnr MI AITA/AL91 lNN 101L NIA1lli N S NMMI! nwlna utEr ~~ : In1AWN1i! I tell J lA11 • t OIOi NEn AfA IVnAL IPA 7K l0 R M PM°1 IN eD]m N 100( a 0GNi1 AIFD]°6 W 19DA M WnsfMNr ~ler ' ' 4 1 a b GRAPHIC SCALE . Nrlx t NII >m sD n. mm No01 !RA >a N1A M A10A MC, t°IYMi GlIIN INNImIN1f, LIC. !NO ' Y LAP V1COi1 f MT mlYW[ ~y F r.~f. • A~snspR m,ellvmaMOa1n11e1n ~ ~ Nu PNp011Y, No nm MIFNGII >mE NNNMn NI.MII a ~ SN~ • ~ mA i~ia¢ Nm saATmi o' Nn uoomolm utartm, rvo xNa n1 nncnlo oeM a Nas swln we m1AMn n 1 sMn v AvYANE n xNNION nNU xN[ !IE milL SfNla n6 n m mnrx RNT n6 NM M nAr AIN M ester oX NNx R 6 WED Iee wx N AdJ1NnQ rN M'IM4Y r ML7)ADL m M 1[Jf V 0.11 IINAEJR MA[ Aa IO E°J1N0 V16J10f. M ONIIl1Ciq fILYL INZAtAN M 1N[ FEO]r At NOM 01 TNO SnfJa OETAL IEgNOIGm Q1MJlIm NO MNN[0 rv MTA/AOI LNN p ) N rCr) . LONTmI T NN NmNimM DrlLif[t 110 SIYIL K E0061RL fR DMNH 1111E 1JN1fle,' AIO.Y 110110a RON 4 A * 4 4 T(A). 1~1). 4 2 / 1 W . N 5 m In NNJC A PMArt U161TOL NOM W IIn NNNN 1°ml 16 iML'A' 1We0r, NN NNNIMr m M AONnLLT rvponca AE AOVNO rv MTJ ACII No N OIRf M M Gi[ 'y v De mmarM d Ax uINM1 ster. o Ay GON N-o-mol rn w m D nnom a s>H P ~ SIAIE 6 GVOMA ' W< O } m • 0 x ... I m ; VI o N o q h e m R=542.00' ~ d i g u 0; D=63'05'92" i ~~ x ni ~, L=598.89' ~ ~ W ~ N ~ o w u a a w C ~ o a ~~ ' # M A R (PUBLIC R/W VARIES) n n ~ Y AVENUE ~ ~ rWNO aTY YONLIYEN7 BASIS OF BEARINGS °m o ~ eeY11'S5'E el m ~ 4 ~ BJ.77 n 1 589. 55"E ufa~[ a U Z v ~ ~. 7 3 e +T eEL ~ _ ° ' 589"11'55"E 169.68' ~~ ' C9 ~ ? ~ O B R=280.00 X80.00'00" Z ~ }'A~ •g,,, ' L=499.82' ~ W Z . ~ d ~ 8 ~ ~ E mac w rr°~ w " . ,_ yo RE ~~~ ~ c , ~} ~ NDO'48'05"8 - tea ''~ ~'s Z °~ k" 4 - - PIT ~ 12.80' ~ ~ ~ n ~' y °m ~ # o ~ F sl. b m~ CpIC .ceET1ALx FDOE a AOOr 04ENXARC . ~ n ~ L ~ W ~ o ~ ,a,.~D• ~~ 1 ~ . ~ I.. F 7 rn ~ ld ~ ONE S10RT cONC. eLaa eulnlNC ~ a ' l1 N P 1S.2e3 W. FT. a ~ 7. ~ 2 ~ ~ YL ~. a!E s7aRr Q m caxc scat IAA°NO ~ °. o ''~ 4~'n. ¢` (() g + p Nldl CONC . . 2W]B n G 7 O 'P AEIAAANC WALL , s.Ir PLANiFR ~6 ~ ~ F~ P I aNErx ~ ~ ~ S. S n 241 17 Q pawl ~ . ~'r a° OSSCD EIXS a AOOF ONRIIANC p n DG o t OMI ~ ~ nlxrtR C ARLAOE /J 81 \ Z + 1e1.2r F nAna sa.m' ~ ~ j o! ~ ts' ~~ $ $ w''4 W ° u 1 41.21' 4IR/' e1•~ J > U ~ ONE SIaiY ~ CONE BLDG( BUADINC ® ! ~ 11121 Si = ~ ' ONE 57GJY g CONC. BLOB( BGIaNC P ~ ~' P 8 stEP >a i $ E1NE AO OVEAIIIN6 ~ ~ ~ ~ v= te1.4s ease s ® ~1 w r '~ ~~ ~ 7 VJ ~ uu op 0"1 ccec s10Ee'ALN 4Y 6 ~~~ ~ 141 ®° N w ~ UO a p . ai ~ i aIE STORY U A ~ $ coxG BOEMNX ~ ~ conc. BLOdc euwlNC Q W Z ~ u` ~~~ T ES m ~ ~0 S S 1005e l a \ J ag Jr x AREA=952,884 . (8.101 ACR ] SQ.F ,E, g `"'` ~v e1.az \ tA~¢ o.u' ma' R Q f' v~, a V 4 ~` ~ caxc. c ~ ~ o N J I ~ ~o. e1.2Y o Q ~ ~ ' ~~ ~ O °"u ' y Z i R=100.00 ' ' " e PUU+iFA +B ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~=68 46 18 ' t ~ 4 > 40' Q L=120.03 ~ ~ a RsNff _ _ _ _ PUNTER YAIA7 (~ 3 J FLOOD NOTE: Ir N n 7aN,) N r+ NNIn Y rn.l N+ ~ ~ YM 0,~ ryA. A6 U 1 , v x J 1 nN Blr rl.~.wa~e.°=..a"""iNln. w n n»b.sNMO"INxN.eA".y ~ ~.~ N89.15'40"lI 572.45' D ~ °B 44.95' ' ° Syy ~ ~ Ir b DN NNbp rllee nwr PrlNwi I N84'03'28"J/ ~ " G A N89'15 40 = ° eem) +lNI bnM !+ a.imnlN r,ll "n.Mr rNWlb n , 139.69 " u i z Ol M IMNA N1 W MnIJN ~ ~~ b Illnlb NY u. M NMlN N,IIANb "NJ Y WI b,N11 NY 411NInn11Y "+NY (120' PUBt1C R VARIES) m 1 I a. rrv !Nn w rr.s eMlr"r N..I.rll AprcJ STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD _ ~ ' ~ y 4 m cvr runurror CUPERTINO OAKS PHASE1IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF CUPERTINO, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SANRARY SEWER NOTES SHEET INDEX ,~ o- ° -' wWew ~ '= ~ pp'iw.Yren ana,u p~~ Y i L ~ IYYM+rb :.i.a~ydtlh ~/ f : , 9 oar t 4 ~. ,i;awc, t .x ~~'~F° ~ i ` rmpdep gxuwu- ~, .i nwemt'e; mdu. , ,,.';evSd , r, ~sd`p,e_ -- _~ fn 3mCra,~ ., _ ,..- , 4 ~~.~..-.H. Immw.ua. .. ~. .` rl.. _ awe w[[ ''• .. ,~ par,.C ~ ~;_1lw.en aA~bra$ ~- !'. p NYkL .. GGM -llf. # E J} 7 w~wu _~., "" ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ti ~ ovb ~ ~d `. '$. ~ i?~} µ++nnk anent $t..~ I ~ L ~wWa• ~ ~~p Cairn ~. F ~ ~~1. t 4p ~~~ ,xua, ~ c4' mwn~. ~~ xo,ur,= ~, 1 ain$a € E r ~ ,mu' """rsr vl ' am~a ~- - ~ ~ _ n~ •_. i` . ~-, . ~. Tau; .~ si ~ ~~ ~ a~~` ~~ ~~ VICINITY MAP N.T.S. C-1 11TLE SHEET C-2 GENERAL NOTES C-3 NOTES AND LEGEND C-4 EXISTING CONDITIONS C-5 DEMOLITION PLAN C-6 GRADING PLAN C-7 UTILITY PLAN C-8 DETAILS PROJECT DESCRIPTION THIS PROJECT CALLS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 121 UNIT HOTEL, SURFACE AND UTILITY IMPROyEAtETNS WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF PHASE 1. 1. AN work performed shag be indeNed to manufacturers spedtweHais end all work shall mmply with all wnent local, stale and federel requiremeds. 2 M work shell he anstmcled b eccadence with Nesa plans and Na StantlYd Spedficetlons of tlb Cupertlno SeNary aslaa 3. M ezrave8on and baddNing vdNin sired righ4ofwey shell ba done in eaoMance with Ne regdrements d the FsglneY d Ne pudb agency having judsdiction. Encroachment PYmib shall be obtdned end a mpg shell be on the job dudrg conslrudlon. 4. FIN matedel shat be canpacted b e minimum d two entl ace: heN (2.5) feet above the lop d pipe eleva8on by methods that will not damage Hre pipe a substitded with gravel or are (1) slung mix. FIN metedd must atldn a minknum d nlnaly five pemYd (95%) releHve ampadbn, as par State d CelNaree StarxlYd SpedfiwGOro. 5. The D1aMd Erolneer shall be roHfied Ma 121 woddna dava in advance d deRiro ansbuctlon on this orded 20833 StevYre Craek BNd. Sdte 101, Cupertlno, CA 95014 (408) 253•TD71. At that tlme, trefNc plans, encroachment penn8a end the sewer dNYabn plena drill be giver m Ne Dlsbid Engineer. Sevrer dherebn pleris shell Ndude aevrege bypass entl emYGencl' plane. Wok shah not begin unW the Dlatrid Ergineer has provided raPoen acceplenca d Hiese plerm. 6. One (1) sentlary sewer Iderel shat be Natdled for each lot a buNdbg. LaraUon d Iderel end property comer to be staked in field d the same tlme the sewer meN b staked la cansWdion. laterals drill rot be laid on less then ywo pYCent (2%) gads and shell have a rNnMum cover d four and ab haH (4.5) feet Y properly Gna a edge d santlary serer easement Lelareb droll ba deeper than four entl one hW (4.5) fed when dteded by Dlatrk1 ErglneY. Laterals shell not be extended heyad the street dgM-0fway Ilne or anitary sewer easemem Ilro untN the mein hen been tesbd. Lateral sewers mnsWcted outside d the publb street a CupeNno SenNYy Gitldd Ememed elrsll be camWcted in acmrdance w1Hi the regdremenb d, and shall lb Inspected by Ne Cl y d Cupertlro &dlding OepeRment 7. The CaHreda perlanpng wok on the senNary sewers shell be requked b register wNh the D'eldd and provide InwrYx:e as sped8ed N Sedlons 1.38 end 1.40 d the DlsUld'c SWMeN SpedAraGons. 6. The Deveoper end General Cordracta shill he responsibb fa praerAon d ell exbtlng Improvemeds indudng exbHnp aenNary aevrer fedNNes that are to remdn end N damaged duig conaWdbn d tM proposed Improvemerro, shill bB repaired to tits setldedbn d the Cupertirw SanNYy DisMd end other a6ected agerrJee. 9. ChanneN d Y Dbldd manholes nMNn the auiabuctlon area shat be protaded by plywood covers, placed in Hb manholes aril menMe ua8rgs shill be edjuded b final grade N eaoNence with Ne 5'tenderd Spedfira8ac d Ne CupeNm SerNlery Disbkt a es dlreded by the DISbIU Engineer. 10. The Developer end Geneal ConUedor shill be reaparsGie fa the prevenlbn d tomUudbn debris emednp the exbllrp sanitary serer system due b the mnsbudbn activities eesooabd vAlh Nis prapd end Ne Davabpa end Comracta shell pay eN cods essodeted vdN the release of oonsbuction debro fdo tlb e>usttip senNary sewer system due to tlb car:sNrdbn activltiec meodabd with Nb pro)ed. 11. The Developer end Geneal CorNada dreN !b respaalNa fa Ne prevedion of a sewage epNi associeled Hie Cordreclas BdhMIBe an tlNa pentad and Hb Deveoper Yid Cadreda shah pay all ends e~odeled vrtlh tlra reease of sewage kN0 aortae drainage system and dowrobeam suRace wales 12. UtlNty Notificetlon (Camreda shell lax4e aN uGlPoes prior b dart d extavetbn): a. UMeryreundServiceAleR600.227.2600 b. Stortn0refnaCtiydCupertlro a SYNtary Sexers CuperSno Sardlary Dlabld 13. All Sardtary Sewer Pipes shill be PVCSDR28 a approved equal, unless dhenviae apedfletl by Ho DWrkR Engineer. 14. Access for pedsstriare and vehides shat be provided at di times unless approved In wniUng by the D'xMd EngineY. Approval d these plans by Cupertlno SenNery INsbbt aces not relieve the InaIdIY d Ne resparelHlllry fa Ne arrediar d mistakes, artas, a omdsbns. If, dudng the course d mnsWCtlon d Ne sarNlary sevrere the public inherent requires a modlfica8on d, or a depYhae from Hb Dlatrid Specilicatlo~ or these Improvemed pbre, Ne Dbldd Engineer sheN have the aulhodty to require such modiNratlons or depYWre eM to spedfy Hre manner In whkh th modficatione a depenure Is b be done. Approved ,20D4 CUPERTINO SANRARY DISTRICT Disbid Engineer '~ t~ ~ IN Jun 04 n pY N v ~$aj ~~~nf$$ `8$~~ Wd~~~ W~ m~ ~~ ~:~ a z rc 0 J Q U N ~ ~=o ~yN~ H QF~ wa~~ d a N V 0 z F w a U !I~ C- 1 1a ® BKF ENGINEERS CAUTION: 1. 1HE LOCARWS, SIZES AND/OR DEPTHS OF EXISRNC UNDERGRWND UTUIIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLNI WERE OBTLANm FROM SOURCES OF VARYING RFLN3NTY. THE CONTRACTOR 15 CAURONm THAT ONLY ACNAL IXCAVADON WLL REPEAL THE TYPES, IXTENT, SIZES, LOCATIONS AND DEPTHS OF SUCH UNDERGRWND U11U11E5. (A RUSONABLE EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO LOCATE AND DFI1NEAlE ALL KNOWN UNDERGRWND U1IUTIES). CONTRACTOR SHALL YEflIFY LOCADON AND DEPTH PRIOR TO ANY IXCAVARON OR IMPROVEMENT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHNl CONTACT UNDEAGRWND SERWCE ALERT FOR LACARW OF UNDERGRWND UTIUTFS AT !EAST 46 HWRS PRIOR TO Cd1MENCEMFNT OF CONSTRUCRON -PHONE (B00) 842-2414. CONTRACTOR SHNl 4ERIFY ALL E%IS11NC UTILITIES PRIOR TO BEGNFANG ANY WORK ON THIS SITE 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL RENEW THE RECORD DOCUMENTS FOR THE EIOSRNG BUILDINGS (DRAWNGS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT) FOR ADDIDWAL UNDERGROUND CWDIIIWS THAT MAY OR MAY NOT ALREADY BE SHOWN ON THESE DOCUMENTS PRIOR TD COMMENGNC IMTH UNDERGWRND, diAdNG OR FWNDARON WORK. 4. THESE DRAWINGS DO NOT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR MEANS, METHODS OR PROCESSES THAT MAY BE ASSOdATED W7H ANY TOXIC SOILS IF FWND ON SITE THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPOIISIBIE FOR COMPLYING N1TH ALL dtt AHD CWNTY STANDARDS AND APPROPRIATE AEWURWS OF TO%IC SGLS AAE ENCWNIERED. CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY THE dTYS PROJECT MNVAGFR IMMEDIATELY F ANY SdIS ARE EVEN SUSPECTED OF BBNC CWTAMINATEO. GENERAL SRE NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MST THE SIZE PRIOR TO BIDDING ON 7X15 WORK AND CONSIDER THE EXISRNG CONdBONS AND STE CONSTRANTS IN THE BID. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE W THE POSSESSON OF AND FAMIUM PATH dtt STMDARD DEFNLS AND SPECIFlCATIWS PRldi TO SUBMITTING OF A BID. 2 ALL WORK WSTE AND IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CWFORM TO qtt STANDARD DETNlS 8 SPEgFlCARONS 3. ALL WORK SHNL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE XI1H THE SdLS REPORT PREPARED BY TREADWELL AND ROLLO DATED: 11 AUWSF 2003, PROJECT N0. 3718.01 AND THE APRIL 6, 2DD4 LETTER TD JANE VAUdIM 11TlED 'NORTH PflCPERtt UNE RETNNING WALL DESIGN RECOMMENDARONS 4. PRIOR TO BEGMNINC WORK AND AFTER INITIAL HORIZONTAL CONTROL STAKING CWTRACTOR SHALL FlELD CHECK ALL ELEYARWS MMKED MITH (E) AND REPORT ANY DISCflEPANgES GREATER THAT 0.08' TO GTYS PROEECT ENGINEER. S DAMAGE TO ANY E1tlSRNG SIZE MIPflOVEMENTS, URU11E5 AND/OR SERWCES TO RENNN SHNl BE RESPONSBIUtt OF THE CONTRACTOR, CWTRACTOA SHALL REPAIR AND/OR REFUGE IN KIND. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPME AND IMPLEMENT A TRAFFlC CONTROL PUN THAT ADDRESSES THE N® FOR 1HE CWRNUd1S USE OF THE STREET THRWGHWT THE WRARON OF CWSTRUCRON. 7. qWL ENGNEEA OR SdLS ENdNEER TO RENEW ALL GRADING ANO SUBMIT A FlNAL REPORT TO 1HE Gtt PRIOR TO OCWPMCY S CWPACBON REPORTS AND PAD EIFVATION CERRFlCATE IS REWIRED ON ALL BULGNC PAD WORK. B. CWTACT PUBLIC WORKS, 773-3104, FOR DAANACE AND FlNAL GRADE INSPECRON, WHN21 MCL.UDES DRAM LNES MD ROOF ORLANS/bOWN SPWTS. 10. CWTRACTGt 15 RESPONSIBLE FOA DUST CONTROL MO INSURING THE AREA ADJACENT TD THE WORK IS LEFT IN A CLEAN CONDIRON. 11. THE CWTRACTOR SHALL RENEW STD. DETLAL 6-4 ON TREE PROTECRW PRIOR TO ACCOMPLISHING ANY WORK OR REMONNC ANY TREES. 12 URUff BEST MANAGEMENT PRACRCES (BMP'S), AS REQUIRED BY THE STALE WATER RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD, FOR ANY ACRNTY, WrIICH DISTURBS SOIL 13. ALL ROOF DRAMS AND/OR DOWNSPWTS SHALL BE DRNNED SHEET FLAW Z% AWAY FRdd THE BUILDING AND MAYBE COLLECTED BY DRAINAGE INLET CWNECTED TD PUBLIC STORM DRNN FAGUtt. IF AND ONLY IF THE ORAINAd: IS IN 1HE HIL15OE MU CAN THE WA7EA BE dRECTLY CWNECTEO TO 1HE PUBLIC STORM DRNN. SITE MAINTENACE: 1. CONTRACTOR TO GATHER ALL CWSTflUCT10N DEBRIS W A REdJUR BASIS AND PUCE IT IN A DUMPSTER OR OTHER CONTLANER WHICH IS FMPRm CA REMOVED W A REGUUR BASS WHEN APPROPRIATE, USE TARPS W 1HE GOURND TO COl1ECT FALLEN DEBRIS Cfl SPUTTERS THAT CWLD CONTRIBUTE TO STORM WATER RUNOFF POLLUIIW. 2 CONTRACTOR TO SWEEP OR VAWUM THE STRE£F PAVEMENT MD SIDEWALKS ADJOINING THE PROTECT SITE MD THE ON-SITE PAYED MEAS ON A ONLY BA515. SCRME CAKED-ON MUB MD DIRT FROM THESE MUS BEFORE SWEEPING. CORNERS MD HMD TO RUCH MEAS SHNL BE SWEPT NANUNLY. J. CONTRACTOfl TO SWEEP OR VAWUM THE STREET PAVEMENT MO SIDEWALKS ADJGNING RTE PROTECT SITE MD THE ON-SITE PAYID AREAS W A DAILY BASIS. SCRME CAKm-W MUD AND DIRT FROM THESE MUS BEFORE SWEEPING CORNERS AND HMD TO REAd1 MEAS SHALL BE SWEPT MANUALLY. 4. IF THE STREETS, SDEWALKS MD/OR PMKING LOT ARE PRESSJRE WASHm, DEBRIS MUST BE 1RAPPED AND Cd1ECTED TO PREVENT ENTRY INTO THE STORM DRNN SYSTEM. NO CLEANING AGENT NAY BE DISCHMGED INTO 1HE STORM DRAIN. IF ANY CLEANING AGENT OR DEGREASER I$ USED, WASH WRIER MUST BE COLLECTED MD DISCHMGED TO 1HE SANITMY SEWER, SUB,ECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE dNS ENGNEER OR INSPECTOR, OR OIHERNISE DISPOSED OF THROUdI APPROVED dSPOSAL ME7HWS 5. CREATE A CONTLANEO AND COVERED AREA ON THE SITE FOR THE STORAGE OF BAGS, CEMENT, PLAN15, OILS, FERIXJZEAS, PESRdDES, OR OTHER MATERIALS USED W THE STE 1HAT HAVE 1HE POTENBAL OF BEING dSCHARGD INTO THE STORM DRNN SYSTEM THROUdI B1HEA BBNG MIND-BEDLAM OR IN THE EVENT OF A MATERIAL SPILL. 6. NEVER CLEM MACHINERY, EWIPMENT OR TOOTS INTO A STREET, GUTTER OA STORM DRAIN. 7, CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT CJBJENT TRUCKS, PLANTERS, OR STUCCO/PUSTER FlNISHINC CONTRACTORS DO NOT DISCHMCE WASH WATER FROM EWIPMENT, TOOLS OR RINSE CONTNNERS INTO WTTERS OR DRAINS. B, THE ON-SITE STORM DRAIN FACAJBES SHALL BE CLEANED A MINIMUM OF TN1CE A YEAR AS FOUAWS: IMMEGATELY PPoOR TO OCTOBER 15TH AND ONCE IN JANUARY. ADOIRGJAL CLEMING MAY BE flEWIRED IF FOUND NECESSARY BY THE dTYS ENGNEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPWSBIE Fdi COSTS ASSOdAIED KITH CLEANING. 9. CONTRACTOR 70 PREVENT DUST FROM LEAWNG THE SITE AND ACWNUUTMG ON ADJACENT AREAS AS REWIflED IN THE DUST CONTROL NOTES ON THIS SHEET. 10, CONTRACTOR TD PREVENT SEDIMENT DEBRIS STORM RUN-OFF FROM LUWNC THE STE OR EN1EftINC STORK DRNN OR SAMTARY SEWER SYSTEMS AS REWIRED IN THE EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTRW NOTES ON 1}NS SHEET. 11. MNNTNN E%IS11NC TREES AND PUNTS THAT ARE TO REMAIN AS flEWIRE0 BY THE TREE AND PUNT PROTECRON NOTES ON THS SKEET. DUST CONTROL: 1, WATER TRUCKS SHALL BE PRESENT AND IN USE AT THE CWSTRUCRON SITE ALL POR110NS OF THE SITE SJBJECT TO BLOM1NC DUST SHALL BE WATERED AS OFTEN AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE Gtt ENGNEER MANAGER IN ORDER TO INSURE PROPER CONTROL DF BLOWING DUST FOR 1HE OURADON OF THE PROJECT. 2 WATERING ASSOgAh77 'NTH ON-SITE CONSTflUC110N ACRWtt SHALL TAKE PUCE BETWEEN THE HWRS OF 8:00 AM AND 1:00 PM ANO SHALL INCWDE AT LEAST ONE UTE-AFTERNOON WATERING TO MINIMIff 1FIE EFFECTS OF BLOWING DUST. 3. ALL PUBLIC STflEE1S AND MEGANS SdLED OR UTTERED DUE TO THIS CONSTRUCTION AC11Mtt SHALL BE CLUNED AND SWEPT ON A ONLY BA55 DURNG THE WORNNEIX, OR AS OFTEN AS DEEMED NECESSMY BY THE Cltt ENGNEER, TO THE SAIISFACRON OF THE CITYS ENGINEER INSPECTOR. 4. WATERING ON PUBLIC STREETS OR POWER WASHING SEGMENTATION ON STREETS SHALL NOT OCCIXl, UNLESS CWTRACTOR COlLEC15 AND FlLTERS THE WASH WATER PPodi TO 175 ENTERING THE GTYS STORM DRNN SYSTEM. S. DN-91E PAYED ACCESS ROADS, PARKING AREAS, AND STAGNC AREAS SHALL BE SWEPT DALY WTH A WATER sNEEPER. 6. ALL TRUCKS HAULING SOIL SAND, AND OTHER LOOSE MAIEflIALS SHALL BE COVERED W11H TMPAWNS OR OTHER EFFECTIVE COVERS. 7, THE SPEED OF ALL VfliICLES DRIMNG ON UNPAVED ROADS OR PORTIONS OF THE SIZE SHALL BE LIMITED TO 15 MPH. 8. WHFFL WASHERS SHALL ~ INSTALJS.D AND USm TD CLEAN ALL TRUCKS AND EQUIPMENTS LEAMNG THE CONSTRUCTIpH SITE If WHEEL WASHERS CANNOT BE INSTALLED, BRES OA TRACXS aF ALL TRUCKS AND EWIPMENT SHALL BE WASHED OFF BffORE LEAWNG TIE CONSTRUCIIW SIZE EROSION 8 SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES: 1. EROSION CWTROL MEASURES ARE INIFNDED TO PRL'1fNT SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FRdJ ENTERING THE dTY STORM DRNN SYSTEM, SANRARY SEWER SYSTEM OR FROM LUMNC IFIE SITE THE CON7RACTdi SHALL MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN THE FELD TO MME SURE THAT THIS CONCEPT IS CARRIED OUT. 2 EROSION CONTROL FAdLI11E5 AND LFUSURES ARE TD BE INSTALLED AND OPERABLE RY OCTOBER tat (OR WTriIN A PERIOD Di THREE WEEKS AFTER THE START OF CONSTRUCRON ACPWTIES, IF 1HAT START IS BETWEEN OCTOBER AND MAY) MD SHALL CWTINUE IN EFFECT UNTIL ,MME let OR UNRL INSTNUPON OF THE PERMANENT SITE MIPROYEMENTS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME 1HE CONCEPTS ON THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, SHEET C5.1, ARE SCHEMATIC NBVIMUM REgAREMEN75, THE FULL EXTENT OF WHICH ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CWTAACTdi. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE E%ACT DESIGN AND EXTENT ~ 1HE EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM 50 THAT IT WORKS PATH THE CWIRACTOR'S INTENDED USE AND NANACEMENT ff THE CWSTRUCDON SITE 4. ALL EROSION CONTROL FAGU71E5 SHALL BE INSPECTm BY 1HE CONTRACTOR AND REPORED, AS REWIRED, AT THE CWCLUSON OF EACH WORKING DAY WPoNG THE RAINY SEASON. THE CWTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE EROSION CONTROL FAgURES AND MAKE NECESSARY REPNRS PRIOR TO AN11gPAhR STORMS AND AT REASONABLE INTERVLAS DUPoNC STORMS OF E%1ENDED OUflARW. REPAIRS TO DAMAGES FAGLITIES SHALL 6E MADE IMMEdA7FLY UPON dSCOYERY. S. AS SOON AS PAACRCAL FOLIDNINC EACH STORM, THE CONTRACTOR SHNl REMOVE MY ACWMUU710N OF SILT OR DEBRIS FROM THE EROSION CONTROL SEDIMENT BASINS MD SHALL CLEM THE WiLET PIPES OF ANY BLOG(AGE 6. PROWSON SHALL BE MADE TO ASSURE THAT BdtROW AREAS MD STDd( PILID SGLS ARE PROTECTED FROM EROSION. IRIS SHALL AT A MINUMUM CONSIST OF COVERING THE MUS PATH PUSOC SHELTNC. 7. PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CLEARING GRADING, OR E%CAVATON, THE CWTRACTOA SHALL VERIFY THAT THE OWNER HAS SUBMITTED TO THE STATE WATER R6WRCF5 CONTROL BOARD A NOTICE OF INTENT (NOQ FOR COYERACE UNDER 1HE STALE CONSTAUCDW STORM WATER GENEAAI PERMIT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MNNTNN A COPY OF THE NG W hIE CONSTRUCRON STS. 1. 2 3. 4. 5. 8. TAEElPLANT PROTECTION NOTES: PRIOR TO BEdNNINC CWS7RUCRON ON SITE, CONTRACTOR SHALL IDENRFY MD PROTECT EIOSRNC TREES AND PLANTS DESGNATED AS TO REMAN. FRONDS 6 FORT TALL TREE PROTECTION FENCE WTH dSRNCRVE MARNINC NSIBLE N CWSTRUCRW EWIPMENT, ENCLOSING GRIP ONES OF 1REE5 DESIGNATED TO AEUNN. WORN REWIRED YATHIN FENCE LINE SHALL BE HELD TO A MINIMUM, AVg0 UNNECESSARY MOVEMENT OF HEAVY EWIPMENT 'M7HIN FENCED AREA MD DO NOT PA17N VEHICLES WITH IDLE RUNNNVG ENGINES UNDER DRP UNE OF TREES. PPoOR TO REMONNG fl00T5 MD BRANCHES URGER THM Y IN DIAMETER aF TREES OR PLANTS THAT ARE TO REMAN CONSULT 'MTH 1XE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ANY GRADE diMGES CRUIER THAT 6' W11XIN THE DRIPLINE OF E%ISDNC TREES SHALL NOT BE MADE MITHWT FlRST CWSULBNG THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PROTECT IXISRNG TREES TO REMAN FROM SPW1ID CHEMICALS, FUEL dL MOTOR ql CASWNE AND ALL O1HFR CHEMICALLY INJURIW$ MATERIAL; AS WELL AS FROM PUBBUNC OR CONRNUWSLY RUNNING WATER. SHOULD A SPILL OCWR, STOP MDRK IN THAT ARU AND CONTACT THE dTYS PROTECT MANAGER IMMEDIATELY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSBLE TO MITIGATE DAMAGE FROM SPIUfD MATERIAL AS WELL AS MATERIAL CLEAN UP. 7. FRONDS TEMPORARY IRRIGARW TO ALL TREES AND PLNITS THAT ARE IN OR ADJACENT TO CWSTRUC110N ARUS WHERE F)TS11NC IRRIGATION SYSTEMS MAY BE AFFECIEO BY 1HE CONSTRUCRW, AL50 FRONDS TEMPGLMY IRRIGAIIW TO RELOCATED TREES 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSBLE FDA WGOING MNNTENANCE OF ALL TREES DESIGNATED 70 RFMNN AND FOR MNNTENMCE OF RELOCATED TREES STOCJ(PILEO DURING CONS7RUC11W. CONTRACTOR N1LL BE REWIRED TO REFUGE TREES THAT DIE DUE TD LICK OF MLANTENMCE. 1 DEMOLRION NOTES: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IACATE AND CLEARLY MARK (AND THEN PRESERVE THESE MARKERS) FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCRW OF ALL TELEPHIXJE, DATA, STREET UCHT, SIGNAL UGXT AND POWER FAgURE$ THAT ARE IN OR NEAR THE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR'S BID IS TO INCWDE ALL WSIBLE SURFACE AND Nl SUBSURFACE FEANRES IDENTEIED TO BE REMDYID OR ABANDONED IN THESE DOWMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR 0.511E INSPECRON TD NLLY ACKNOWLEDGE THE E%1ENT OF 1HE DEMWRON MURK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE Fdt OBTAINING ANY AND ALL PERMITS NECESSARY FOA ENCROAGiMENT, GRADING DEMWTNMJ, AND DISPOSAL W SND MATERIALS A5 REWIRm BY PRIVATE, LOCAL AND STALE JURISDICRONS. TIE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY ALL FEES ASSOdATW WITH THE DEMgJRON WORN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL HAZARDWS MATERIALS FROM THE EI(ISBNG BUILDNG AS IDENDFlED IN THE SPEGFlCAl1W5. WORK AND DISPOSAL SHALL BE DONE IN A MANNER AS SPEgFlEO IN THE $PECIFlCARONS CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSBLE FOR THE E%EWRON, PERMITS AND FEES ASSOgATED KITH THIS Nt1RK. 2 3. 4. 5. 8. 7. 8. 9. 1. 2 3. 4. 5. CON7RACTdt SHALL PAY DISPOSAL FEES BACKF61 ALL DEPRESSONS AND TAENdIES FROM DEMWRON TD THE SARSFACRGJ OF THE SdL ENGINEER. WTHIN LIMITS OF M7MLK, REMOVE WRBS, dJFlERS, LANDSCAPING, SGNAGE, TREES, SHRUBS, ASPHALT, IAVDERGRWND PIPES, ETC. AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS REMOVAL OF UNDSCAPINC SHALL INCWDE ROOTS AND ptGANIC MATERIALS TO 1FE SA715FAC110N OF THE SgLS ENGINEER EROSION ~ SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES: CON7RACTdt SHALL PROVIDE A CONSTAUCRGN FENCE AROUND TXE ENRRE MEA OF DLTAWRW AND CWSTRUCBW, INCWDING N1 STAgNC, STORAGE, CONSTRUCTION OFFICE MD UTDONN AREAS FENCE LACARW MAY BE ADTNSTED FRGA TINE TO TIME AS CWSTRUCRW PROCEEDS TO EXCWDE SOME MEAS WHERE CONSTRUCIIW WdtK IS NOT BEING DWE AND THE MEA IS NDT OBJECPONABLE IN NSUAL MPEMMCE CONSTRUCi1W FENCE SHALL BE A MINIMUN OF A 6' HIGH GALVANIZED CHLAN ULAN PATH GREEN WINDSCREEN FABRIC ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE FENCE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFUGE THE GREEN FABRIC AT LUST ONCE A YEAR OR AT SUCH A 11ME AS IT BECOLIES TATTERED MD UNSCHILY DUE TO WIND OR CONSTRUCTION AC1IYltt. CONSTRUCRW FENCE ADDRESSED IN THESE NOTES IS ONLY FOR WSUAL CWFOILMANCE OF RilS CWSIRUCRON SITE TO 1HE qtt STMDMDS. CWTRACTOR MAY REWIRE ADDIDCNAL FENgNG, BARRICADES OR OTHER SAFETY DEWCES TO KEEP THE SITE SEWRE 8 SAFE. GRADING NOTES: 1. ALL PAYID MEAS ARE TO SLOPE A MINIMUM OF 1% MD MA%IMUM OF Bi ACCESSBLE STALLS ANO LOADING ZWES ARE TD SLOPE AT A MAXMUM OF 2% AND ACCESSBLE PATHWAYS ARE TO SLOPE AT A MAXIMUM OF 5% IN THE dREC1KKJ OF TRAVEL, MD THE SLOPE CROSSWAYS TO 1HE DIRECRON OF TRAVEL SHALL BE AT A MA%JMUM OF 2i ANY AREAS W THE 9TE NOT CONFdtMING TO 1HESE BASIC RULES DUE TO EXISRNG COIAIRONS OA dSCREPANdES M THE DOWMENTS ARE 70 BE REPORTED TO THE ENGNEER PRIOR TO PROC®ING WITH PUCEMENT OF ROCK BASE, FORMWORK FOR CUft85 AND/OR FUTWOPoC 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE URTHWORIC WANRIIES BASED ON THE TOPO(,YtAP1iIC SURVEY, THE SdLS IN4ESRGARON ANO 1HE PROPOSED SURFACE THICKNESSES AND BASE THE BID ACCORdNCLY. NOTE TXAT A SEPARATE DEMWTION CONTRACT HAS BEEN ISSUED TO TALE THE SITE FROM THE WAY IT R AT THE LIME OF THE B61 TO THE CONDITIONS DESCRIPBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS ANY dFFENENCES BETWEEN THE STATE IN WHICH THE SITE IS DEIJVERED TO THE CWTRACTdt AND iNESE DOWMENIS SHWLD BE NOhD TO THE ENdNEER. 3. ALL FlLL SHALL BE COMPACTED PEfl 1HE SdLS REPORT AND THE CWiRACTOR SHALL COORDNATE AND COMPLY KITH THE ONNERS TESTKNG AGENCY TO TAKE 1HE APPROPRIATE TE5T5 TO VERIFY COMPACRON VALUES. 4. IMPORT SGLS SHWLD MEET THE flEWIREMENTS OF 1HE SdLS REPORT @ SPECIFlCAII W 5. 5. COORDINATE THE PUCENENi OF ALL SLEEVES FOR LANDSCAPE IRRICARON (WATER ANO CWTROL WIRING) AND SITE UGHRNC PRIOR TO 1HE PLACEMENT OF ANY ASPHALT, BASEflOCK OR CWCPETE SURFAgNG. SFE UNDSCAPING AND SIZE ELECTRICAL DRAWNGS 6. DO NOT ADJUST GRADES ON THIS PLAN YATHWT PPoOR NRITIFN APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. 7. SITE STRIPPINCS 1HAT CWTNN ONLY dtGMIC MATERIAL (NO DEBRIS TRASH, BROKEN CONC OR ROCKS GRUTEA THAN 1' IN DIANE7ER) MAY BE USED IN UNDSCAPE AREAS, IXCEPT FOR ARUS IDENIIFlED AS IMPORT TOP SGL BY THE LANDSCME DRAWINGS IXCESS STRIPPINCS SHALL BE REMOVED FRaM ~rE B• SPOT ELEYA7IW AAE TO FlNISHED SURFACE 5• TOP Q CONCRETE WRBS ARE 0.50' ABOVE TOP OF PAWNG ELEVATIONS, U.N.O. 10. ROUGH GOADING TO BE NITHIN 0.1' AND FlNISH CflADES AAE TO BE WTHIN 0.05', HOWEY4t CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT CONSTRUCT ANY IMPAOYEIAENTS THAT WILL CAUSE WATER TO PWD OR NOT MEET flEWIREMENTS IN GRAGNG NOTE /1. OENERAL UTILITY SYSTEM NOTES: 1. ALL TRENCHES SXN1 BE BAdfflL1ID PER THE SOILS REPORT PATH APPROPRIATE TESTS TO VERIFY COMPACTION VANES 2. CLEAN W7S, CATCH BASINS AND ARU DRAMS ARE TO BE ACCURATELY LOCATED BY THEIR REURONSHIP TO THE BUILDING, FU7WdtK ROOF DRAMS, AND/OR WRB UYWT, NOT BY THE tFNGTH OF PIPE SPEGFlED IN 1HE DRAWINGS ('AHICH IS APFR078MATE). 3. SEE PWMBINC DRANINCS FOR CONRNUAl10N OF URURES WITHIN THE BUILDING. 4. ALL PROPOSED UTILITIES SHALL BE UNDERCRWNO, UNLESS SPECIFlCALLY CN1ID WT A$ ENTERING THE FACE OF THE BUILDING 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL STME LOCARW OF ABOVE diWND URUtt EOdPMENT (BACKROW PREYENTOR, ETC.) AND MEET 1MTH CITY ENdNEER ANO PROJECT ENGNFER TO REVIEW LOCARW PRIOR TO INSTALUTON. PUNNING DEPARTMENT NUS1 SPEdFlCALLY ACRES YA7H LOCATION PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE INSTALURW. 6. CWIAACTOR SHALL PREPARE AN ACWRATE COMPOSITE URUtt PUN THAT TAKES INTO ACCWNT THE ACNAL LOCARON OF EXISTING URUTES AS DETERMINED DUPoNG THE DEMWRON WORN, THE URUTIES SHOWN ON THE GWL DflANINGS, AND THE SITE POWER, CWWITS AND UCHRNC SHOWN ON 1HE ELECTAICN. PUNS 1HE FlRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE INCWDED AS DESIGNED BY THE DESGN/BUILD UNDERCRWND FlRE SPflINNLER CWTRACTOR. 7. FOR CRANtt ROW SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY (POTHOLE IF NECESSMY) SIZE, MATERIAL LOCARON MD DEPTH OF ALL STSTEMS 1HAT ME TO BE CONNECTED TO OR CROSSED PPoOR TO THE TRENCHING OR INSTALUIIW OF ANY dIAVTY ROW SYSTEM. B. CATHODIC PROTECIIDN IS REWIRED ON ALL METAWC FlTTINGS MD ASSEMBLIES 1HAT ARE IN CONTACT W7H THE SdL CONTRACTOR IS RESPWSIBLE TO FULLY FNdNEER AND INSTALL THIS SYSTEM ANO COORDINATE MODE AND TEST STARGI LOCATIONS VATH gTYS PROJECT MANAGER. 9. COMPLETE SYSTEMS: ALL URUtt SYSTEMS AAE DWNEATED M A SCHEMATIC MANNER W THESE PLMS. CWTAACTOR IS TO FRONDS NL FlTRNCS, ACCESSORIES AND WORN NECESSMY TO COMPLETE THE UTILITY SYSTEM SO THAT IT IS NLLY NNCRONMG FOR 1HE PURPOSE INTENDED. v n Y ,~ v A ` a C UAO ~ppyj I I oopbm ~ va ~~~~~ ~~ m ^j !:. Q Z 0! O J Q U N H Q F 2 0 ~ Z o OW v Z~~Q ~=WcJi Wa~Z d a U 8 SS b 0 Z F 0: a 7 U ~I C-2 2 a yy J O~ U + > (/W~ y~ (J y~ yq~ m ~ ~p ~p ~t. G N W N (~ . t.~ y N y p U !~ r 4 f[J !~ .y z;~OZ '~ ~~;$ N~m OZ ~2 gAxm A~~3E 1~~1 ,~ >pl~l ~~> Tlo j~ s O O D ~~>~ ~ L~C~ ~ =O~Z '~1~ JC~~~ O ifll~ ~>~G~ ~'~O~ CAIR SIZ = °~~~~ ~~ ~4g ~~ _$ $ 3~KI °~ .~ F v z o c $~mv> c'~r~~ °<= cQQ>iv ~~ i ~N~~i ~ ~> gg ~ ~r4iin i o o m ~v $ ?c p ~; ~>o "~r~j~z a ~~ ~~.'>zN ~ m ~>o s?> ~ °mm$~ fc ~~g~ NG~ 51>~ n~~I°,~ ~x~~~ a g~~ F3~ZC ~f : ; ^~ y ~~~C ~ ~i~u7 C =_~~ ~~'~ tlr~ ~ ~ ~m >~ m~~g ~1~~ ~i D rz.I r~ ~ >~ ~z ~ $ ~ ~~~ "_~ ~>° O f~~ ~z ~ ' f ~ N c ~ ~ ~ "' ~ ~~ ~ O >~ 4o'Q'V'p m. ~v~g "~ >y > y z z$ ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ > = m < 4iy17i v7 N~$ yN=~ N ~sN ~ ~~ ;a ~~z ~~ zz ~~>~N+ s y 'I I-2 Z ~<t~ >~ ~Z~ ~ ~~ ~y> '~~ C C ~ I'IN y~ m~0 A~~ 2~ ~ ~' SO <~On =~~ Z~ N ~~ o ~S,G o~ ~og f+~Z~ 3~Z~z° Z~=Ng ~ ~~c ~~~ ~~` _ ~ c `~ ~ y~ ~ ~ €vo s~~$ o~z y7~~~ z m~ ~ g~ ~ =(qd ~~; vzM ~>~`~ ce ~og° z~° vv ~o p~' cL Ei z ~ z~ FJ L ~ m~ '~~ ~{~'"° ~ > vv~ ° z ~ m ~ ~o ~~x N ~ ~ ~ ~ b~ 3F~N~ zF~ tQ~ ~ -~_ ~ z r~N K Ia z ~g~Z> ~~ ~EzN ~~_~ ~m~ f=~~ 5d$N°m ~~ m~ ~v> "' u ~ '~ m~8 ~G~ ~ m zm~ \mm ~~ ~g~~ i9~~ ~~ ~N ~• ~ Cq ~ m O A z v Qz m Z E~ o n O m~{ > 3 y O~ SI ySB~A ~poooa 9 q_ ~ ~~A -1 ~ FJ °N C> g ~ ~ ~~ pt ~r~ gz~~~ Z Ij ~~~n ~ Qiz ~'~n eZQ~ ~ Cm~ Tp~ m ~tQi$ ~ ~G=1~~ ZAn ~~; ~~~~ ZOO~~"n ~~>E >~ [!1,~~ ~ !±p'7~ O ~'y~y'~ m ~~c O~xyN m~~ AZT p~ gEy~ 'K°~~ mA~ o~ ~~z ~ ~y~ ~y ~~- {~c~y ~v8y $~ K; i~ < l ~ ~im C ~ ~O ~ a0 IL'1 V1 ~CA~ ~ m m >~ '~ g~ > ~g O~ pz~ `~'~~ y~(p~~~ ~~czi i~ '~'~ ~ ~ >° °~~ F o ~ m~Lb$ ~~~ ~~ ~'^~F ~~~R'§' pm~= ~c ~C~ Z ~ yN ~Iy ZN SCm n K Q O A ~m0 ~S? 1~1>n C ~SZ 44 ~ zb o" g~ z~ y LLK G]N~ mOm ;~y m~(om~Q>-m~1 4Zm 08Lti ~ f~IN a O m Nln ~ nAr nQ CI~L~ ~1 ~~ 1f ~ ~~° lRK z~~ F fTZAA~ A~ ~k~ mJC`Z ~NZ ~r$r~f ~t ~~ `~ ~ F' ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~4~ ~$~i _~~ ~y ~+:c ~^~`~~Tz o$~ ~~ °~L~ '~" >r~ 'y ~r ~`m~ ~L~O N°~ g~ ;K ~ ~ `g 9 4 ~_~ ~~'^ ~; °zm~ {Zp~~~°~ g°~ ~ $g>F rz ~~ ~ ~~ m~A ~~FL~ $a°~ ' z~ ~ i z" ~m~ 4'^ mv°ss m~ ~ 4 ~ ~iNZ~czi ;OZS ~ ~z v ~~~ ~ z °I~i18~ zY ~BZ ~~ ;~ ~ ~~~ ~^ t4s rop; ~z~ ~~ ~~g~ >~o ~~c ¢ >ocom mm~~ ~ c»p ~ ~odg '~mIz~1'~~~III ~((//~~ ~c ~ ~ 1v1 cep w' ~y. z' ='yp ~~^ N~NrSi o mz> 5 ~~~/A ~ mN~ TN ;III ~D-K12 OmK ~~y ~O~ A2 ~,_„ C C A -Zi_~ IO~I~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~A mi Cm.S SIC ~J~~~ N~~ ~. N I<~I 8 x mZ Km2FS ~m Al%1 q ,Ili I=~1 Q 41= -/ZS/1 ~• (~ Z Ip.1 P p K =ZNO~o No O~~ ~~ o~pI >xPlr p$$C~0>p ~ y~y~ N ~j N y rZN ~' L~~O OQN ~ CIm~ICy O ~A ~~~ °K>C Z 4~ nQ A~ r~r ~vj +Itl Z> ~m CO ~ %~ Nm~ Yi ~ Q~= r~m ~~~ ~ ~~eg ~°pN g~ L I>I~r>go ~~ =L 'A"~y -`~Tz ~y° ~u'i~i o X41 Sc NO 7 ~~p ~ >'" ~ y~~ p ~ ~~~ ~ `SS L ~N'J ~Q °~ ~S ~~'yJm m>1~'1~ ~ K m~ N °~C ~~ ~m Z ~m ~ ~ F ~ A 2 ~ 1~1 ~ ~ yy~ m ~ °~ O ~O~~iI 1~'1 m m m m N m D ~ m ~~ ~ Z y~ ~~II. QQ w Iv uL p . ~O~ > i~imta ~~ ~+ C~o o v 10m ~~~g ~g ~ N~~ d~ ~~ m ,b°~I~ ~ ~~ o °° j '" ~ 4'21 ~'~i~ '"TL °~ ggGg4 ~`~ ~`~'' o ~ ~'v^~ca# ~ ~ F czi5 b>~= 5~° ~ itii' ~ '~' m Pp~Q~~ N~~;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~o~~ Q~ € A~~ ~ ~ 2^L V~~~~~ W O NNyy( ~~ _T~~ y~y° mfr~I Htl y/ < ~ p o Tg, m ICI z ~~(~L ~m~$ ~ ~ ~ ~~ f°'I ~NyN ill l9l ~ ~m5 m )( ImI O y~ ~ C N (yA~ s ~LfQJ 6 NA ~~~~ C V ~ ~ ~~~~ I- ~^QQ' O x 3~` ~~o~ ~ ~ gNF ~ o~ ~ ~ y~ 4~~~ g 8 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ m qz ~gR N ~ oTm N ~ > ~z m>;m b 5 ~~ Z >~ v~ 4 ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ b o ~~ ~ I I I I I I m S ~' F o 0 o m a o ®~ ~ g g~ `a x x n ~ i~ m f N ^' ~ o N 0 ~ o ~~ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~ kXi! 4 ~ ~ g'~ ~ ~ ~ m > iX ~ s ~ i ~ ~ ~ [~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' r'1 ~ Iii ~ ~ I~. ~~ s r s x~ ~<~ o ~ N o i ~~~ ^' ~ v A£~ TL a ~ g0 ~ ~ < i iii ~ ~ rn ~ ~ ~' z ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ g m ~ ~ 8> ~ x i~ ° z 0 ~~ v7a~~~~ ~c~A~~yY_~~_~X ~ ~q~ I~mn1F~r'ic"i~ 88E m $ R m ~ ~~ 'z a m p~op~p~p~p~~~~p~o~pm p~I~~~~~[~~~~Ir~~~~~~~~g~~~~g~~~~ +Ix~+1~~nOm1~ ~~I ~ 1~1 I~IR ~'< Z O Z O~ O E -N. A~cc~~g t'm ZQB C<CV$$>`f"~=48"'PS ~ "'~i ~~g ~l ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~;erg ~ ~~~~ ~ g~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ 'g ~~ 4gx ~" _~ ~m R < m ~ ~ ~ ZZ ~ ~"~ n ,~ ~~'~~" ~ CUPERTINO OAKS 98, ~~~ FARIC onnlE _ ~:"~ sunE ,~ ~ ~ PHASE 1 ~~ SAN JOSE, cA 95131 W 3 a°~' ~~ 108-187-9100 ap ~ ~ NOTES AND LEGEND ~~ ,oe-187-9199 cFAx) ,bn N=o7ema CUPERTINO SANTA CLARA COUNTY CALIFORNIA dr~~~~~~ui~~ ® BKF ENGINEERS i ~ r ~~Ir1~ ~ '~ ~~1~1 , ~ ~~A~t;.,, _ -_ ~p / 1 ~ ~1 ra!~ ~r 1 ~~ ~, .may ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ m~ ~e ~ ~ ~1~ it ~ . e A ~ ~ 1 ~ - a~~~. '~ ~ 1` I'1 ~ as ~ ~ \ \~ ~1 1,11 ~ ~ ~ s ~ •~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~t 1~~1 ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ 1 ` r v ~~ `j 1 A ~~ •,, t 1'11 1 l ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ti ~ ~~ ~~ \\ \ ~ ~~ i`,,~1~~~~ ~r`~ k~! `=~~ ~. ago D,r~ CRdPHIC3CALE ~ ti ~ 1 1111 11 ' ~ ~\ `" X ~ ~ ~ \~ ~\, ,\~1 ~ V _~ ~ sax 1 MY . M'R 1 ---//- ` ~ ~yp~ All \ 11 1'1~1~~~1I1 J ~~~ ~~~h~ \ ] h \ :\~~~` ~ V~~ 9 \ ' 1` ~ ~ a~ `\ \I \\ aF~i \~~'~~~111i ` ~ 9:d6 \\ ~ ~~I ~. \\ ~~ a~ oaa~••.mu)~~_~_~>~ ~r1 ~ ~ l ~~\ Z 11` 11~~11 ~ I •~ ~, ~~ ~__- ~Y ne: \y~ ~~ GR0.1nD CDS[tC[D D+ a \ 11'llll~ i~a -~1 met ~ ~OD ~•~ ess~~ 1., ~\\~_ ~"~•°e ~`:` - •-•~ ~jIly ROUND ODSCUR© Dr ~ .e9ss ,'11 x ~ 'J y DENSE TREES ~ ~ ~ 1~~H~' "X ..b ~ ~a ~~; ~'_ m zws-R9~w f / r~s ~ ~ O 1 \ ~. ~~` ~ Z ` ``` `l~ r`\\ ` ~ ~ `_ ~ ~~ e~i.GTREE3 J I \ I I -} _, ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ I r ~ ~ 1.1 _.~ r.. ~ sns zsss~ 1 ~a zus ~ ~ i ~tl~ ~1 1~'>~ i ~ -- / / ~_ ~. 'r 1 ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 -__ _ ~ ~ ~, ~ i ~~'~ IrN ~ i ~4 a .L~ ~ ` I % ~~ ~ ~ '% ~r ~ 11~) ~ (1 { 1 , . ~ ~~ T _ _ 1 . 1 a. .a _ ~ ~~\ i ti,~\ :,~ / ".fin: 1~Is ~ 0~\~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ .~ ~1~~'~~b..d~A ~~~ OCNSE'78EES .~1 ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~1 ~ 1 ~ 1 '~~~~ ~r Sf.k ~•' ,~'~~~~,'~~~"v ~' cy~~j ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~+ ~~ ~, 1 ~~~ 1~~ ~~ ~ ~~ L sn Haf ~ ~\ ~~ ~ ~ 2y aa~`~ I ~~ m~~A ~ ~ ~~~ ,~~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~~, ~ ~ \1 ~~i ~1~,11~ i ~ _ '~ ~ ' x~ ' • ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ' 1' 1 1 ~'hy 1 l ~ 1 ~,r#- _ ` ~~ ~'~ _,~. 0 ~ o ~ W Z ~1 ~ { ~ ~ ~~~1 ~ 1 q ns. ~ ~~ 1 r 1 ~~ ~ ~r I 1~ 'V1 1~ ~r ~ ~r~ ~r ~ l ~1 A.C ( Vf~ ~i ~~O s~ `N s I ~ VI ~ K 1 ~ ~ 1~ ~~ 1 ~~~;,,~. / ~; . ~ ~ .~.. , ~: ,~ may ~~~ ~ ~, a D~~~a~D~R~~ + I a ~ ~< `~~ ~~~ ~~~~~r sss~~ snag ~ ass' ~~ .ti ~ ~I ? sns / ~ •~ V' ~1Q ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ W ~ ~ Z ,a,.~ ,~ < ~,, ~~ Y 1 ~ /~' ~, ~~~-295 1 ~ has r ~~ ~s sva ~ / -.~ • ~ ~' \~ J~ ~ A ,R ~ ~~~ ~j91 ~~ ,11 ` ~` \~ ~I ~1 / mod, `~ x~,x ~ ~ ~•`~ ~ l~ i i r~• ~ ~~\ ~ I 1'a~ ~ 11 1` I ,~, ; ~_ , . ~ •° ~ ~'~ 1 ~ ~~ __ ~ ~ ~I ~; ' i, ` p ~'~~`''=M Y ."p . ~ 'Q" ~ ~osm onsuacD er i zsaw ~ m ~ '1 ~ ~ r ~1 °~ .,,,, ~w`e DEruER~¢s ~ Wo ~'~~~ ~ d ~ 1 1 1 ~1 1 ~ a ~1/ ,`~~9+a 1~ 1 J ~~~ ~.. wr. i flA.ff,IRRi rill 1 1 ~ 1, ~~~~ ~ ~~~~1 ~''~I1 ~~~>oos ~ ~~~ '~. ~ ~ ~~~~ ~'~~ ~,:,.~~ ~'`°` mustm¢s~~~~ ~~I~~~~ ~~I Z I~11 JOG `1~95~~ n`~~i ` ;p r sp I! ~c R e ' '(Iry•~ ~lq~ ~ :r I ~~ GR I ~ i 4IU O HY 1 ~~ II I` \sr~ 11 ~~~ I I I ! r I I ~~ ~ rbA~l'7 ~ 4r ~ R'~~ I'. ~ I ~EE9 ~ ~V ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~l~ ~_ f ~ ~•e 1 e ~~~ ~ ,~ ,1~ ~,~ ~, 1 _ ~ _ , .$:9'' ~~ ms ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r W i ~ ~l ~_ ~4 1 1M1 ~ ~ v N ~ ~ ~}{ ""'~~~"""ttt"~-~~ "' rl ~~ ~~~ ~1`~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~`~-~a~~~~1 ~ x~ ~t~1~,~~~~~ ~1~ A~~~~~IIJJ~ ~~~ l ~oa~ ~ ~~ r `~ ~ z>u I~ i~11 1 ~. ~ . \ ~ ~ zru ~ I\ n;, n ~1 ~1 y ~ 1 II / ~ ~ -\ w I ~ ~R%7S ~ \ 1 ~~ ~ '. ~,` ~ ;DC~u'c __ ~ ~ ~ l I 1 ~ ~ r ~ r ir1--: l D~nur~ossEURE~°9~".._~~ /l~~V. ~ ~."`\ •~~\\/:~\ -~~~'~D~ErRE~s J,<~ :.... z~'~ ~ I'~I ~l - 'lI ~ r/r~ I's~+~ ! ~ l i~.~_L 7+~'L..il ""i A T"ru~is~~NeE~ ~W..Y-)~`'~'f~' 4r 1 - e I - _ _ _ ~ -- - -~ ~ '° . _ a~, ~~ _ _ \~ns.c\ ate, \ :R:?`~ _ ~• ` \ ~ I }(~,~ j7-I .. ~ 4~ ~ mx I; ~--+__~~ __ __ I _- _ ?`1_ _ _`'_ '~'_= x--~~xsas.-~I _ ~ DrowNp Numhr. 4~Rg m our rur.IUrrac rl i ~„ 1111, 2 ~ ~ ( ~ g 1 ~ 'i~ ~' ~ ~ ~-, 1 1 ^ _. \3 ~,~\~„~ oE~amoX Xo,ES: o ~ma t} ~ '~~ `111 \\,`l,\~~\~~. ~ ~ Qj R~o~m~ rcgR:. 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~\~ ~J ',.A ~ - RE110~E AC 1 l ~E ~ ~~~`` ~ ~K" ,< ~` \\\~\ 1 ~ ~; ~ m 03 RE1101E EIECiROIIER Y °am~i7 7' ~ ` "~ ~ ~ ~~ ~II ~:. \~` 1 ~ ma.+~ ~~~~•.'~ ~ RELDCAIE iRANffORA1ER PPD ~ ~ V Q ~\:, xiFn `~~ \~11 ~ 3W3 1 ~ ~ 1, 1111~~' i~ ~ ~~~= i / ~~ F'~ V ~ . ~` '~ e 11 1 ~I I \ c '! ~ su ~~ ~ D D Y `~y ~ ~ ao\ GRAPffiC SCALE •w 11~ 1 .1A36 ~ ~. ` \ ~ \~~ \ • ~., 11 ~1'`' 1 ~ ~ ~~~\~ \\•'\ ~ `~'~ \ I u tar) ~~' V ~~II ~I ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~'~ ,~~ ~ ~ ~'~~ ~.~ _ esss.~ .~~~ ~ ~ nu IIeeD .1q R 0 FeF1 1 111' ~ F ~ I . DO ~~ `_ -"~i~m'"~-~ ~ 7 r GRDI/nD CDSCURCD D+ Q \\\\, `\~tiI ~ \ ~ 3 \ '"'I~, ~ T.~a ~.~' i aswr DDSELkEL nr ' I =,. \ ql .. ~~ ~ ,\ \ -L -~95 ~' DENSE TREE ~ ~ as ~~ ~ y1,` 1 a PI~1 111 1 ~ rni ~ ~ ' ~--~ / '~^~`~~- .Q9eF ~, , ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~I - ~~I 1 ~'~ I ~ AA'v (y ~fJy ~~F / ~ 1 ~ ~l ~ i .~l ~ - ` ~ !_19L. \ ~ ,p12~ . 11 ~`'~a 1 ``'I1I11~ 1 % ~(1 1 '3 ~ '~ 1 ' ~ F" ~ cs~ ~-l "~R.. ' 1 veya, `~.:~ `~ ~~ ~, ~`~~ ~ ~ Y/ F~ r``\~ ~~ ~11}~~ 1 ~ / I i - ~ ~ /~~~jW,a'~ v `'~' D\:E iREEi \~ 1 ~ 1. 1 l~~ ` I I 1 .~~°}~ \ \ \ ef`pa S,nv:~': ~ ~\ -_ \\_` \' mui ' Y /2 1 1 11 `q„~1 ~~ 1 „:.a Ll 4.d ~~ ~ \ 1 1 ~~ 1 ~ 1, ~. \~° '1.4 v 1 ' t ,,,,~ ~ \ ~ I J z I Rul ~1 ~ 111111 ~ ~,~mF ws ~ ' •~ / ~ ~' ~ n t ~,, \ 2~S ~ ,m,\eni ~ ~\ ~ ~ ~`\ ` ~ ~ R~~~y~ 0 r a =O 1~~ ~ ~~' ~ ~ ~ m°~ F~ .I ~s~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~'~.6~~ ~.~ ~ \ "~a ~`0. :ead ~ Dn ~ ~ ~ Z Q ~ ~. ~ ~~~ F~ ' 1 ... ~ ~, ,.,~ ~~ '1s c-~Pmi o~scuaED et ~~ ~ Q F ~ ~~ I 1 1'1 '~ . ' \ \ UENf IRE!Y _.1,,, ~ X111 ~~~ r ~ ~ ~. ~ ~/ ~ , ~ ~ V ~ h ,;1~,' W ~ z '1"'29s ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~'~ ,~ .«e ~` ~ ~L to ~\ ~ 1{ ~,~ ~ ~ . ...• , ,, ~ 1~,. ~ v 1 t "`~1 1 I ~r ~ 1_ , R ~y 6 `` d ~/'~ ,\ ,` y V ~ I~~C~\ \\+~, ;w f "'t ASE 11 - u ~- e ~~ ~ ~ 1~',1,~ ~ '11 ~Y ~ ~~ ~~ 1 ~ o~{~g •~^ ` ism DxsrwEn ar ,~ ~~ _~ ~ ~' 1 ~~~~ ~ L ,jl I ZF v ~ ~~ivC 7ENSEURCFS ~ ~ ~~ ~i ~VV F 1 ~r' '~ `~1~~~ X11, ~ ~ sos YRS ~ 'f / r ~~~. ~~ ~ 1rv~\(~:~~'~' ~ f7lTf,IFFD a~1~~, ~ ~ ~~~~ ~) ~~~~~ ~~~ 1 1 ~ 1 +,~ ~.+~ - 1 1 O 1 N ~~ 'I~ , \ /1e sn 1 i~ lam. esi. ~ '"'0 DCNSC TRCCS I~1 ~ I I ~ III Z ~~1 I 11 ~'~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ ,.--~ «~ ~i.BEIA4! I ~;~ F~ i ~~~ ~ '---~ ~~ 'I ' ~ ~ I I w ~~ ~ °D6 sss ~ mF: ~ 1 !nF !' ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ I~ i. ~~' (( ~o U X11 ~ ~I ~ ~f\~ ~ 1 . ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Iq ~~ ~ 1 yh ~~ I ~'~Dxa F~~ ~~ n er 1 1 / 1 (~ ~7~~ ~ ,/lyyifsy, '(\Iyr fI"~{I~c~ ~ ~1~\II n yll ~ ~ ~ 1 f 1 ~ • d I ~ ! ~ ~ l / I 1 ~ l I 4 6~~ s.F \ cC ~ Lw' I` I.1 / I,S ' ' ~ I ~ II I EES ~{~~ 1 ~ 1 14~ II l \ 5~"' 11 ms ~F' - ~ ~~-. ~ ~' r _ .:qst ` ~w 171 ~ v ~ !~ \ 1 III\ I~I ~/ 1 P efl. ~n_ al.n ."I°1~~~ / ` I ( ~ 1 1~ ~ ~ V, ,~ \V` ~ 1 , 1~ ~ ~ I :i 1 ~ ~ , X11 ~ ` IJI~ 1 1 , x,>` ~ 4 ~ ~ 111~ \~ 1 ~y ~~ ~n.. iFF. .,., ~ ~ ~ '~ ~.~). A, ,, ~ \ ~~ ~~ 1 ~ F ~ ~~ ~ _ ro- _ _1 ~~ 1 ,~, 1 ~ \ \ .~ ~o IiX .D L~DSG r _ rl I ~ 1 ; ~ ~ F 1 -L ~ ,~ l I I i r] ~R.'fS ~~~/ aq ~' ~ y I f ~. ~~~ ' I ~ r~.~ . ~ "" ~~nFZRDU~YII~UF~~R]'~MR' ~~~~' °o S ~ = t ~ ~ u.w DEME TREES ~~ ~ i. aae F' I ~~' ' _ _ I I ~ ~ I I I ~W / p i _,\ .; _ __ _ ~ _ _ ~ ,T ~ ~ '~~- -~_~~ - - X55-~ =~ --31 ~ ~ ~ ~ ------------ `\ - - - - - - . - _ _ sn' _ _ . _ _ \~ a _~ _ ~ ~"~ ^\ ~ I _____ __ S `\ ~ \F \ I q %~ ./f I C-5 5 qF g 0 BKF ENGINEERS y, m 1 111 I l `6 /* 1 y 1 1 i r fl y S,1 a ' ~~ 11~ ~ GRADING NOTES: 1( ~IIII ~,-' / "Y~~ QI NEW AC SURFACING AND PARKING STALL STRIPING < ~ u ~. 11 1`~'. ; 'r~ _~. ~. ~ ¢.i ("~,^~ r O NEW PARKING AND LANDSCAPE ISLWDS rc ~av 11 i1~1!.11 . ~ 1 1 + ~ w IIIA II ',+ I ` W I 11 ~ 1 `111 ~• ~ adi~ ~ Il 03 E% BUgDINC BEING DEMOLISHED AND REMODELID 9 g ~^ ~ m rc v~ y , y , 1,1 ~1 `; ~. 4' ~. "~ ~ r.2 0 NEW AC SECTION AND PARKING ~~~~$ 1 1. 111 P.1 t! i '~}" A JI ~ I' ~ o I 1 1 11~ ~ III ~ ~i~',. ''``t ~~ ~ x ~ QS YECETATEO BIOSWALE, 4' WIDE MINIMUM w 1 1 1 L IIIJ~1 i Gy ~~`s~`r-°-~- ---,~--. ~~~. ©NEW 5' w1DE SIDEWALK ~~ 1 I J~ ~~ X111' 11 ~ ~ 1~ I ~ ~ ..ww,,~~ r y 1 kb 2 ~J° ~' { {,'2 ~ I 11,11 , . , t 1` >i '~ •' 1 ~ 1. 111 1,. ~ ~' ~ K~ ~ M . d F. 1,'11,1111 i ~ ~ ~ `, '' ~ ~~~v~:ILr~ ^`tw. n 1 11 ;`I ,IQ 11 ` ' ~ a?~'° y G'n c ~ ."C ~ _._ GRAPHIC SC1LE 1 11 m ~. ~ •f> ~ I f k 1 ~- s 11,,11 1 ~ .< ~ `_ e ~ i , 111 ~ ~ ~, ~_ .~ `~~_ 4 `I 11111 ` ~ ~ 1 X11 ~ ~ 2e ~. 1 1111p111 ~ _ _ „R ti ~ mr m 1 I _ 111 '! I ~' .~' ~ _ t '~~" ~ r~ ~ x~v ~tR.uN: ~l 1 111 ply 1 F~ `i a'R •`'ti.. ,) • - I, V f cao n a uvr_ ni I ~ y 1 rA +1. l } 1. 9.)FL ,' ~ 7 ~ _ -h ~ 'L ~ ,`' ~ Y I Q :r.l t nlyl ~~ , M . ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ .rnl'`~~ ~ ~ ~~r- ~~~ ~ ~~~i T..[TUr~,. 1 ~~ ~~ ~~ 4 ~ ~_,, ~ l n n P ~,, Fay ~ 1 ,,~. ~ ~-,. ,_. _~.~ _ -fir-- a* M1 i ~'~_.__ Z 111 w4A s `\' 1 _,,, _ ~ $.iS.rz-c. ~,y_. 0' yII 11 ,~ y i ,a. 1 NPR j ~ 1 i j r f ~ ~ ,.,~ -_ m~ :: .2.s. , .e+e= '~' - ~ ,~ ~ a , •__ 1 ~;1~~~~11 ~ '~ ~. :~, .- IuIeRY' OVF _ __ ~ ~'~' `~'-~"`~1`, ~, ~ ' 1 ', .1 1 ~Iwllal~~~l 1 J s 1_ I I j t, _ .,~ ~ 11 ' 1. ~" 1~ ~ 1 ', 1 ti' t{~ - ~ ~~'`•, Y ~plllll 1 1 t ' 1 ~~'1 i.~' ~I __ ~ l .~ 1 1 1 1 '„~n 1 1 -~` ~. A~~ 8 ~~ ~'~" d" ~"" 1 s ..,s -- ~ _ _ V y`j1 Ill ~ ~, "1 t `. ~ y2^ ~)~~Oe.l ~ 1,, - ~ ~ ~ -.. y~ ~"~ _ 1 - ~ ~1) INy 1'-~~1 ?l' f ~ . ..i ilC• y 1~ 1 ~ ~ ~ l 1 - r ~ ~) ~ z- f % .{'...' ' YA , l a 1 - i - w ` 9~ C~•.. `~'~.' 111111 ~~ 4~;A ll~L ~' 1 ~ ~~~ Ik ',\ ~ d s''~~ a _~_.r ~/ ~ ~'F 1 `~ 1,111 ~i1 11111111. . +~~1 ~Q ~ "j` / `% [: 2W. b 2 _t 1 ~ ~...\ Y.~ ~' + 11 H 1, , . - "?- ' a - ' , war ~ ~' ~ ' •, 2e C. ~ J z `1 1 t 11 ~W~1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 1`II~ <.A ~ '' .° a u•. O r ] ,, ~'~ 1 1 1 ', '.r, ...:. I4 a3 11 l 12 -. 5 1 1 dl i ~ 11 111 ~ •Y' - F' ,1 ~ li , 1 ~.. li ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~1 ~ C) .. , it 111 / ~ 4 5 .. - a u[ a U +r Ifi~ 1 1~;1;~1 ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ wll 11.E ., 1 - 1-/ E.. 111111 ,11 ~. .i i ., }~ y~ ' I ,.,.~rl }i~ 2 y ~ ..y I ~ Y ~ ~[ ~ ~ Z Q `1 11~ ~ ~, > .y.,1 ~ t ~ ~ ~,1 Z Q o 1 f L r ~ rl~ y N (~M1 L,' A y' • ® ~ 11 A U'~ ~ ~ ~1 i1 ~ /Fy~ /<y V I L~ _w~ £3 ` ~ 1 ~ ' ~ 5 1 1 11V a Y~ Q 11 1 11 ~ l t G .~ ~ I 1 JJ ~, ~ `~ pil W ~ Z I ~~ ~ la. ~ . - t" I a r.' ~ ~ y ~I A1E ~~J ~ I ++' - +, ' .I} I ~.D,nm urrs~~~cu n. ~ ~ - ~ 1 i ~ ~N If ~ I ~, ~. 1 ~',~ 1,.1 1 I .,. ', ~,' '.. ' d 'PHASE 7 UI71P?iP+c- ~ r P ~ ~ n f Il- V' 1,111 ~~ `, I u•cu 1~1 ~ A l ~~' 1 \ ~ r 7 ~, io~ 1 f~ 1 I l~. . s 1 111" r. ~ - `~ 1 _- 1 ~R 1 I ~~ 11 1 It ~, t r u ~ ~ ~a ~ I ~, r ~' , 1 1 N, 1, 1 Ir~.o~ C) 1 ~ 1 "h ~ g 4 ~1 ~,- ~ ~ S1 ~ y ~ ,1 ~ ~ ~ a ~~~~~ ~ I 11 ~ 0: ,,~ 1 i. 1 I ~ A III I 1 ~ 1 %' 1 ~ I ~ 1 ~ o L u,o ,c~+r , ~~ a ~' I ~ 'f6 1 1 ES5 ~ ~ , .~ w Y ] ~ U NNN"` ~ c ~ a : ~ ~, ~j I , gM I i ~ 1 1111 ~~ h 1 ~~ 1 - L~ ,. ~ ~ ,' , r' ~ ..~:"- ~ ~ -~"'t"i `~ l f ~ ~I 5 h i 1 1 I ~~,, i,l 1 ~ S 2~ I 1 I1 1 { Y~ '. 1 1. i, , .,N 1 , 1 ,.~\ / .~-LIN.E 11~ i v•~ ~ .. ~ y ~ ~ I ~ I I ~ N - 11 ~ 111 ~, ~~. r: r°" 1 / ~ 1. 0 k L ~ ,1 sos Z' ,} 1 `~~ 1 1 " i, .r ~ k~ I ~ ~ ~ IIl U I 1 1 ~ ~~ "tll e ~ 1 v - ~ t ~ 1 V ~ ~ ~, , ~ •4 .~ ~~ Y T~ I ~ I I lp ~ ~_ 11 4 ', 1 ~41. l ~ ~ .-1-~c _ z ,. / fx ~ ...: - e ~ ~m., 0 ~ >~.. = , ~ t I ,~'1 Id i ~, ~ 'j , ~ aoc ~ 1 0 ~ -~~ 21. ~ ( ,, ~'' ~ t ~ ~~ 1 1 i ~ ~~ ~ -r - ~^ T9~vK:un ~ I I ~ CEO ', I I s.. .. 1 ~ ~ ., ~ ~'~, > ~ 2 ~, ~ 1 Idl'A~IN~~MIT R1~01.ar 1.~ 1 i. + ,~ ,cn Ce~c d2• --r- h 1 a r i 1 ' I i 1 1 I 1~ ,~ 1 ~Af ''+r21r ~~ N' 1; 1 1 r :m.. ~ 'NF., ilr ~. .~ "7r:• I 1 ~ 1 ,IJ J~e ~ i ~ ~ ~ 7 , t w0 v I ~ A .. r o-._; • ~ I ~~ 1 E ~V / ~tV '- ~ 1 1 ~'~ 1 ~ ~ ~~ ... ~i ' I I~~+ 1"l1 _ ti; ~oFn F I: r:F.S"~, 1'' _7V ~-, r > ff ] _~~ N ~ 4 ruc +, s-~ . _` ` I .. ~ ., - ,, .. \ _, ~ . ,, - >u, ,>> ``~ ~. - 1 -, ~ ;~~ , ~ ~ - r ~~ ~, v V ~ ` { ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ n 4~_.,,J t.. ~ F vi e• ~`~„~y_.. ,. _ / ' - DrawY19 Numbw: r~s 6 DE 8 rtl alrc ruriY +' ~1 ~ - r, 1, ~ r 1... ;~Q,,rr~' ~ I~r. i 1"yti y ,1 1111, 11 ~~ ;~, 111 ~ ~ ,; ~ ~'".11111 ' ~ n $ , ,~olS ~ ~ ~ w••-~ ~,_~ 1 ~ ~ 1111,,,, _ 1 n.11.1 i ~ 1 ~r a ~8w ~11 1'Y ~I '~ \rY 1 ~ 1 ~J 4LC1IO Whh 1 1 `l Iij 1,gryl 1 I~ {," ~ j \ ~.\,)Al ~h \ ,~) ~' ~ f ~ 1 ~I VII /'l 4 1~ _~ ~ ll ,1. 1 `~ ';'~ II i I 1 ~~iI~I'1 lr, 1, ~\~(' \ \\''~, , i ~ ~ Y I 1 1~11~1~1lII S ~ t~x°r., ~'\\ ~j ~~'' l :.1 I 1 1 ~1 ~" 4t~ ~ ~ uY -. 1 ~ , '~~ ~ 1,1 411 11 ~.4~ v A a ,.l ~ 1. I 1 ' 1 ~'i,ll ! `~ yy~~ 1 i F 1 ~\~ ~' ~ zss,ll 1 , ~1i111ii~1 kf ~~ % ~ v '. ~ i~ 1 1 ~ 1~11d11 ~~ ~ d *'"u. ~t ~ ~.. a ~ ! 1SIi,111 ' ~ , ~ ~ :. '~ Yu; •~ ~ , ,1.) I ~' ~fcAa. cuiT~[.R•`8 V sj a\ ` S~J1,'1 SI ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o j GRAPHIC SC1LE ~~` 1 1 41 ._ti. ~ , j / il~ 1 1 1 1111111101 ,boz v .~ / ~ ~I ~v v ~.~~ ~ °`~ - ~ ~~ ~ ~'"' ` 11 11110 ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~~ ~, ,,~-+~a~ I v r ~ I 1 ur mr ~~~ 1 t 111 All 1 ~ 4".~w, ~ ._~~)_ - , ~r^.4C ".~_ ` 11 , 1411 V11 ~' 431f 1 ~~ ~~ iPdl ~~ ~~ `y -.. _ ~ ~~ ~° ' 11 x uul ne c ael ar ~ ~ 1 u n~ ~e~.ure~ ~ Q ~ 4 ..~ •~ `~ a~1~1W1sT ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ., ~ ~ `~ ~ 1 f l ~ Z 1 N'r 1i ~ EN 4~µ 1 ~~ _ L[1, a 1 } , i 1 iii 01111 ~, ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ -_.~~_~ ~ -r-~e__e ~- ~ rs, eF.. - O 1 1 11~-~ 1~ 1 11 R ~ ~"•~ r ._-_ ~ 8 VCP -. is 1 ' „Iglu I i~ „~ -° ' / •,.° ~ '~-~i ~~-`~ /e i -Q-~-~ _. ,- '1 1`~,'I ~E;,1~11Pp1~t d1 tni~tls~oola~ ~ s~1 P~`~." ~ ~~~,~~ -- = '-'~-~ ~x~\ ~. yam-,-, , -r~~ ~- ~,~~ 11 ~. 1~)hg11~1',.I I 4;-~ Ij~ I .ice ~ I•,. ~ ~ ~ ~~ - ~I 1 1 1 1 t•;~ '^'+~- ,, A ~ ~ rr I .I 1 ~n ,11 :es., d111,1i ~,, 11 . ~I~ a: 1.. i '~ 1 a 1 i . i I, 1 ! ~ i ', ,n ! 1 ', ~ S'~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ L .>..- `~ `+~ ~ ~~ r v _.' ~ .., ~.~ 1 1 k'~ 1 1 ~ , is ; - a i i - - -'~`~_ ~ ~ "d ...ow y111111~1 i 1 .1-"1- ,y I 1. _ _ "~ ~'^k1D . ~ ~:9 ~w 1 I,I l~i y I r 1 0 ~ Jf , ~ ~ ~y, i .. __ ~ ~ ~.~ ;~ ~ .~ AI~i.E /, N 1 ,1111 I yy i ~1 11110v: '~ d 1 ~ ~ ~ 'u - _ .-4 1 f 1tll 1' 1 l ~. 1. E%s H,~ V J ~ ~ ~~'~~ ~ m. ~~. ~ H ~1 01111„1 ~ ~ ~' s e ° `' v ~ 1 1 a: u111 h ..- ~ ~~s 1 - ~ t ~-,~ 1. 1 1 ~, 1 1 a ~ ~ r ~ k~,` \ °s d : 9 ~, O ! - ~, 1 , t - ~ , 1' t II1111~y ; ~ -, 11 12 S ~ 1 0 .. ~,' : 11 1 ' 1U 4 ! L 1 , 1 1 ~ S sl ~ ~~ I + ~ ~~~ `. ~e 4.~ a O ~1 _ 1 1 ~ / ~ ~ W-5r~ a 1~ 1 1 1 11 1 mrP~ v.. ~v 1 i 1+1111 , i , L' 010 0 4 1 ~ ., ~ , ', 1 ~ _ ~ . ` 1 y 11111 ~ I s-.d~ , S-= ~ 1 o E ,. d 1 ( ~ \ S ~ ~ ~~ ,n 1 1!1~ w 1 1 ~-~- ~ ~, s ~i:, ~ v x Su TaSS ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~n ., z , ~ 1 1~1, ` , ' 'i~ IY I a o _ { I W 1~1 1 vyE~ ~+ ) . ` . _ so s-amo ~ ~ 1., ~ ~~ I '"" ~ ~ v ~ r ,S• ~'t,~ ' ~ w 1 t i `11j a' "'9' I Ik ~ ,1 ~ sus-a.ofPVC ~ °~r ~, e~:F~ ~ e~~ ~~.1., '~1 ~ ` ~ ~ t V .; i -. 11, d 11 ~~= ~ ~!• 1 !1, i 1 I Y ATE ~~'E ~. '., Z ~ ~ 1 n ~11 . 1 ~ ~ ~~ 6•"~.~~_...-.' PHASE1-uGFw 6F. ~. A ~ 1 ! ~1~ k~1 , y. 1 11 ~ it .,/- i 1 ~' FLJPL V .F.Cl "r ~ 1 1 1~'•n q~1 1 1 tP.14 _ _ I~' i~'R i n ilv[CC ~ ~~_, 1 ~ 1 I i ~ ~1t 1• t 1 VS~ "'.~ I I 1 s a ~ 1~e ! 11 I~ ~ 11,'°" I ~~'~. - ~ e ~ 10 ,. o er~ ~i ~~'11 A 111~,1~ ! '1 ` 1 I ~ I. O 'I 1 ~I~.~~~ ~s '' ~ ~i- ~ ~ 111 J~.v ~ '~,y, 1~_ r x:: j ~'~ 1, ~~ 11 d ' z S i h. i11 ~~~ 1 ~ 1 0. t.~ ~ ~ _ i ~ , 1 ~~ I ~ , Il~ P 1 1° - ~ 1 I 11~ 11y - K 1~1 i. 1 -i 1~jry. ~~~ - i 1 % ~ ~ ~~~ 11. O E, f~ II ! 1 i~ d J e ~ 1- I ~ ~'. ~ .I I ~ I ~ ~ I ~ 1 1 ~ ~ U 1i ! ~ S 1. ~~ r 1 1 r ( 1" ° ~` ~.~ I ~ v 1. I ~~ [ ~~1x0 n, I 1 ~ (~~ 1 _ - 1R 1 / I I ,I 1 f '1 • I ~, f Y9 r 11 ~ Q~~ ~ r ;,, I~ ~ 1 1 1 I ~1 ~__ !1 ~ 11 1 1 1 N iE .~. 1 1 .' ~R ~s ~es°. 4R 11 A L~.t''" 1 y~ I~I~ 1 ~1 1 ~ ( 1I 1 er•~v Q ~ pew. ~ __ I. 11 ~ ~ h.P' ~ /r I ., i1 ~i111111 _~~1~ ~" -r \ ,.~~ i ~ ~., tr 'P ~~: ~~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ - ~i ~ ~ ~' A~~; 1~ ~I~~ `'d11 11 0i "~11_ 1 ~ , 1~1 `1S' ~ ~ tl ~ ~ ~ ~ YY ~~~ ~ ~ .'11 , ~ -~ l r - i ~1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~, _' _ 'Y ' 4 ,r~' 1 , AI 1 ~ ~ \~ 1 ,~ °a.° ~ 1 lu. o.mw i ((1 '~J , ~_ ~ ~ a i ~' ~ y'~ 1 es . /~ i ~ ' e ~ .. ~~ ~ ~ I. `Il r it ~ Z r j 1 I y1 1'^ ~-~ .. ~ YY ~! ~ i 1 ~;, .,Ap ~ ~ / ( ~ ~ ~~ , am u 7b17~€A'F`~,`~ulr I ~ ~apnl ~I 1' ~ '7enue r:~l. ~ v~ ~ I ~., i 'i / 1 i~ ( 1 P .~ I t~ I , vrr~ 1 J " -^<-~ `t Y v + 8 ._ ~ _ ~- `~ -,,~ _ - - - - ~_.. _ r ` ,_ ~ •__ .,.,_ _ ~r _ ., -. --T Y~5 , .M) ._ :. s . ~, . _.^ - ----------------------- ~. ~ ..,__ ---t- - ---r- --,~,- ~~ - - ., -# ' ~ v ~~ ~I It_ I l rf 1 ~''. ~ . 1--4 ~ - ~ 4_ ~ -=~s~+-._f~'- ~.-~ ` -~,~~1 _:ou ~` ~ j ~ A .~-i C-T T ~ S ®BKF ENGINEERS `d~~C~C~9V~C~'~ -~ ~~~~C~VC~u~ ::I PLAM crcr uw i~ I~ plrNNllrM E .STANDARD DRC ~ CITY OF CU-lRTINO o n Aq B OARO'OETAILi N. i ~_~ _ ~ I I ~~ vra e~1 ~n' '~i 'W __~_ Nerna LMI plIIK . .AIOTE~ Frr OInWa aq IaF NIA iM INArrI of M Clry Enpnxr. ~A r i .1 L>i r amrNa u 1'1• I II"I ~1 Y~I ~ ~ .~F,• iiir asrna 1-1 pAM1 rrE aE1A'A NLET • CURB OPENING 3-2 .CONCENTRIC MANHOLE eu1 worm, Nar r ry n .awe awlr ~ fr w. NP.rw.Ne1R. YvralA MRx4 Ae.er N Yd CITY OF CDPEIITINO uFAOrEOn { I' 21' I 6• t j 7 a ramble Pa^ement Ilrh { 6 Ah qutla R.; a A+yT 1.~ .,°° 6 o Oleo °YAO > 6A L e ~ { aasl II Aqq hose Ali AZi of r 17 6 i j 21' ~ I ./I I R: In' ~ 1 ;rn , 6 7 or ranade SgOOp~o .,°3oD 1 0 Ali 1' aAm n Aqq. tA1A Ali , Lao' 17 2{ R•O,~B M0.a8 ~ 3. ` ~oas A R.,y Lea' T ,7 ., a.;p/ T P.1/y 04 ~ TYPE E r61WNTABLE DID:I I a o /' t6s A Agg. bm1 TYPE E I ~ f ~ I. I T ~ R.. ' 1p• ~. E~rJ"' -~ f. ~,u RY 4 furizr u F,, SuAOa ---{ i~ oee., .l ~ _ !urea. +' ~1 A C DINE EXTAUDEDCURB ASR A7iD A3i STANDARD CURB SECTIDNS PMS~ !/r) afY OF CUPERnNO APPPWFD BY A7E'. 7-16 EiANDAAD DETAILS C'. IN ~' MIN]MLM GIIASS/TUAF E r B' PERFORAIEO~ PIPE swALL BAacFlLL NATERIU to AEET DRAINAGE INTEN9TY AS NIRAFl N1/O SPECFIED BY CEDIECHNICAL FABRIC ENgNEER BACKFlLL NAIERIAL AS APPRO4FD BY DEDTECHNICAL ENpNEER DRAINAGE PIPE 3 VEGETATED 3WALF NOT TO SCALE 6' ~~ to i ff n rAl.E •1• Y ° ~- ~ ° 8 S a ~ oar AwNnNa Nine. NNpe FONT A' a' suuw lA' n' wm S8 rn m~ ~ ae wr rw wr om•axa :# w'' ¢~ ~~ aa~4$ T naeYM mN Y ~ ~ gpLV~IAA P ~dA .~, ~ ~ JpNr I/C ICL ~ R fLN5i91 ^ y IRP a o' O.G ~~ \ AN7 3 RanxN ~ ~ P `' +~ ~ , ', ~x..M..xwtm.~~arh .1 RWwYd w xNn INMRr RRR erlwxla s. ~"~ " u.~.mnxmn ~ m o ~-0 . aRrr ia x . . M Cma BnNi iWh b YW 1 F Q A x ~ " w" r Y tree ~~ .Na nw aT1- Z n Ear x an+Rwr xx ee a auuRa x ' ~ Inm pnatY M 1 ~ J y s' a U Pewianl b d a IMixRx w, xwAx sA'ur s m wlv 'a '• `~`~ !lC11UTA ••A Y/ DRIVEWAY DETAIL • MONOLITHIC SIDEWALK Q ALx~ a+H LAT QrN~ arT a EuPERnuD AP DA ~ +-~ 61ANCARC OEfAILS ~ Cltt ENCIN J o O W % U ` ~ U I w a Z / N . / ~ O Z F G' W a U ~~b~~~l C-8 S DF lECTION STANDARD 24' FLAT GRATE DROP INLET ~Imtla LI NW ~ r ~ auc ruriurroc CUPERTINO OAKS PHASE2IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF CUPERTINO, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ~ ~~ ~k T qpl ~¢ ~ w4a~ a ~ .r.. +j' irln"wlzY ~~ ~ _ ! ~/+~W' ,.+ ~ +'. ~ + G~ tFy' lie ~ ~ ~' '~~ A b 6l ? ai4~ ,;w,waa ~o.r .~D h errwe~(l'~ y r ~R ii 9 t ~ ~j Y 4 _ prr~~l ,,~=~ ro~~~ ..o~irard,_ v~s~.~w~. ;~ ~~ ~4 ~i Wa ~~ d ~ _ g~M~sf ~( g',wraeu ~ t7u.e h a.M+n 4 a~~ ~ ~ rM ~d { k 4 p~ " P . ~ MM+M.Atebae'A ~ ~„:.. 'i3 r.y~ 5 ~ ~~' v.~na C ~' 7 e ' k. i.'. 1 '', d j f ~. s,aMo- -y C '~'~~' E aw im>! ~ ~ ? r Tt ;N ~~~ ~''..' I IfctltlaON 1 .~~: "ankNb3'w VICINITY MAP N.T.S. ,~ y~ 0 i s/~ ~ n ~ a a ego ~8y~~~ °a~gYS ma~$$ W m~ ^~ ~:~ Q SANRARY SEYNER NOTES Z 0: O 1. All work pedormed shell be irelallad to menufadurers specifications end ell work shall compty wdh all wrreM bcal, state ~ and federal requirements. < I $, N Va)rk shall be wlshlyd8d it aagrdanCe Wltll tlMlae pIBIIS BM the Standeld $ped8cetiws 0} ihB DUpBRiw $eritary U Dbh1d. 3. All exeavdion end becldGng wildn Bred righlaf~vrey shah be done in exaNance wiN the regWremerds of Ne 6girser SHEET INDEX of the puNk egging having jusdiaion. Encoachnsrd PermNs eheN be obtained nil a copy sheN be on tls job during wnshuction. C-1 717LE SHEET 4. FII material shall be compaaed to a mWmum d Iwo and one haN (25) led above the tap of pipe eleva8w tr! msthods C-2 GENERAL NOTES the wNl nil damage the pipe or subaBMed wttlr gravel or one (1) Burry mix FlII material must atlain a midmum d Beaty f 96 l H tl f fi C-3 NOTES AND LEGEND ive perad ( et e wmpac w, as per Stile o CaIHanY Standard Sped %) re catioro. C-4 IXISTING CONDITIONS S TIC District Erslneer shell be edited two 121 wakiw Bova in advance d daNna wnstrudlon w this orded 20833 Sla C k Bl d S k 104 C ti CA 95014 At O 408 453 7071 d ti M i h 8 Q C-5 DEMOLITION PLAN C-6 GRADING PLAN vers ree v . a , uper w, e ( ) . . r ne, tra c p ers, enaoec mem penn s aM Me newer dWerelw plans shall be given to the DidrkA Engireer. Sewer diversbn plero shall IrsdWe sewage Dypesa O w C-7 UTILITY PLAN and emagpng plans. Work shat nil begin until the DIsMd Engineer has provided wriBen eweptence d Mere piers N W U C-B DETAILS B. One (1) sanNary sewer laterel Shell be NstaNed for eedt Id a bWlding. Locetbn d toted end propedy wmere to be i ~ sh in w ~ • es 5 t l se N y pe M (4% red0 8nd ell heVe a minimum wver o bu nil one (4. fed at props~ty line a edg of n8ary Z Q sewer eaumed. Lderale shill be deeper Bsn four eiW one haH (4.5) led when dlrxled M Didrid Engiser. tasreLs shalt not be edended beyond the street Aghfd-way line a eardtay sewer easement Ilne untll 0s male has been faded. W ~ ~ = J U Lateral eewero wnatlucted outside d the public atred or Cupertiw Sadtery D'sMd Eesemed shall be wnstructe0 kt ~ H ecwrdance wNh Us requirements d, end shah be ispeaed by Me City d Cupertiw BWldhg DepeNned. W ~ F- Z 7. The Codroda perfondrg work w Me aanisry sewers shell be rogWred to regleter wBh the Diatrkd and prewde irreurence a N ae specified in SedWna 138 and 1AD d6te Dlshid's Standard Spedfice8oro. 6. The Devekgar end General Cwlrodor shell be reaporePole to prelediw of ell esia8rp imprwemeds indudinp edstlrg sanltery sewer fedlPoes Net ere to remain and 8 damped during wrslrudion d tM proposed improvemens, shill be repelred d Its eegsfectbn dos Cupertirro Sardtery Disiid and dheraffected agendas. 9. Chennds d el Dlatrkd nlanhalBS wNdn the wrsWctian Brea 611811 be protected by plywood wvero, plawd b tl¢ manhdes end madnk raatinps dsN be adyded to feel grade h accordance wNh the SteMend SpedBcatlons d the CuperBna SerNtaryDieMdaeSduectadbytheDMOdctErplnaer. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 10. The IDeveoper and General Cwtrector shell be respomlbb fa the prevenlbn d wrstrectlon debrs ansdnp Bra axbtlng PROJECT - TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING cen8ery sewer sysem due to the wmtrudian ectiNtles eaaodded wNh tlas project end tie Developer and Codrada sheN pay ell was eseacieted wM the release d wrsbudiari debris Ido the esatirp sendery sewer eYdem due to the = SHOPPING CENTER. C0°°~"b°s~w~~ F 11. TM Develops end Ganeel Cadreda ehaN be reapwslbb fa the proventiw d e sewage spNl esaodded the Cwlrectare ~ acdvitiee w tlis project and Bs Developer and Cwtrada WII pay dl was rssodeled wNh the release of sewage ido a sudace dreirspa system arM dos+streem sudaee wales U 12 Wlily Notlfiratlon(COrdredashdl bale ell WlHks prlarbdertdescavatlw): s. llndergramd Servks AkrltD0.227.4800 b. Storm Drolre CNy dCupeBw c. Sedfey Beware CuperBw Sankey DlnMd 19. An SanNery Sewer Pipes Shell be PVCSDR46 a approved egad, unless dtsnviee sped8ed by the District Engineer. 14. Awew to pedeaMans end vehicles shah be provided d dl0mes aimless approved in wri8rq by the Dla6id Engineer. p Approval d these glare M Cupertim SanNary Distrkl does wt relieve the Installer d the reapondbilNy fa the wrredlon d mistakes, amore, a amissbns. IL during the wuree d cansbuction dthe santtary severs the pudk Intend regales a modifiragon d, a e departure frern 0s Dlstdd SperificaBone or these Improvemed plans, tls Dbtrld En~rser eheN have the eutladty to regale such madNkaBans a departure and to spedty the menrer In which the modfiatlore a depedure is to be done. Approved 4004 CUPERTINO SANRARY DISTRICT e Dislrid Enpiser 111p b = C-1 1 a ®BKF ENGINEERS CAUTION: 1. ME LOCATONS, SIZES AND/OR DffMS OF EXISTNG UNDERdEWND UTIUBES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WERE OBTNNED FAdA SWRCES OF VARWNC REI1ABNtt. THE CONTRACTOR R CAUDONED MAT ONLY ACNAL IXCAVADON WILL REVEAL ME TYPES, E%TENT, SIZES, LOCATIONS AND DEPMS W SUCH UNDFRCRWIA U7IUDES. (A RUSONABLE EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO LOCATE AND DELINEATE ALL KNOWN UNDERGRWND UTIUDES). CONTRACTOt SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND DEP1H PRIOR TO ANY IXCAVADON OR IMPROYFMENT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UNDERGROUND SERMCE A1ERT FOIE LOCATION OF UNOERGRWNO UTILITIES AT LEAST 48 HWRS PRIOR TD COMMENCEMENT ff CONSTRUCDW - PHONE (B00) 642-24H. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERITY ALL E)OS11NC UDUDES PRIOR TO BEBNNING ANY WORK W MI5 SIZE 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL RENEW ME RECORD DOCUMENTS FOR ME E%1511NG BUILDINGS (DR0.YANCS ARE AVAIUBIE AT ME PI~UC WdNS DEPT.) FOR ADDITIONAL UNOER(Xt0UN0 CONDITIONS MAT MAY OR MAY NOT ALREADY BE SHOWN ON THESE DOCUMENTS PRIOR TO COMMENBNG WIM UNDERGROUND, BEADING OR FWNDADON WORK. 4. MESE dEAWNGS DO NOT ADDRESS CONTRACTOR MEANS, MEMODS OR PROCESSES MAT MAY BE A550CIATED WM ANY TOXIC SdLS IF FWND ON 511E ME CWIRACTCR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLWNG WM ALL dtt AND CWNTY STANDARDS ANO APPROPRIATE REWU710NS OF TO)OC SBLS ARE ENCWNTERED. CONTRACTOR MUST NOBFY ME d7Y5 PROTECT MANAGER IMMEDATELY F ANY SdLS ARE EVEN SUSPECTID W BEING CONTAMINATED. GENERAL SRE NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL MSR ME STE PRIOR TO BIDDING ON MIS WORK AND CONSIDER ME EXISDNC COIIDIDWS AND SITE CONSTRNNTS IN ME BID. CONIRACTdt SHALL BE IN ME POSSESSIW OF AND FAMILIAR WM dtt STANDARD DEFNLS AND SPEBFlCATIONS PRIOR TO WBMITTING OF A BID. 2 ALL MONK WSITE AND IN ME PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO dtt STANDARD DETAILS @ SPEdFlCABONS. 3. ALL WORK SHALL BE PE1tfORMED IN ACCORDANCE 'MM ME SdLS REPORT OEPARED BY~ETM MELLRIL~B, 2004 DLETIER T0IJANE'WVAUGHAN 11TLED CT 'NORM PROPERTY UNE RETAINING WALL DESIGN REC011MENDATIONS' 4. PRIOR TO BEdNNINC WORK, AND AFTER INITIAL HORIZONTAL CONTROL STAKING, CONTRACTOR SHALL FlEID CHECK ALL ELEVABONS MARKED NM (E) AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANBES GREATER MAT 0.05' TO GINS PROEJCT ENGNEER. 5. DAMAGE TO ANY EYJSDNG SIZE IMPROVEMENTS, U11UDE5 AND/OR SERWCES TO REMNN SHALL BE RESPONSIBIUtt OF ME CONTRACTOR, CONTRACTOR SHALL RffARt AND/OR REFUGE N KIND. 6. CONTRACTOE SHALL PREPARE ANO IMPLEMENT A TRAFFlC CONTROL PUN MAT ADDRESSES ME NEW FOIE ME CONTINUOUS USE OF ME STREET MRWCHWT ME DURABON OF CWSTRUCTNIN. 7. dWL ENdNEER OR SdLS ENBNEER TO RENEW ALL GRADING AND SUBMIT A FlNAL REPdtT TO ME dtt PRIB2 TO OCCUPANCY B. COMPACTION REPORTS AND PAD ELEVATON CER71FlCAlE IS REWIRED ON ALL BUILDING PAD WONK. g, CONTACT PUBUC WORKS, 773-3104, FOR DflNNAGE AND FlNAL GRADE INSPECTION, MHICH INCWDES DRNN LINES AND ROOF DRNNSJbOWN SPWT£ 10. CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBIF Fdi DUST CONTROL AND INSURING ME NEEA ADJACENT TO ME WOAI( 15 LEFT IN A CLEAN CONDITION. 11, ME CONTRACTOR SHALL RENEW 51D. DETNL 6-4 ON TREE PROTECTON PRIOR TO ACCOMPLISHING ANY WORK OR REMOWNC ANY TREES. 12 UDUff BEST MANAGEMENT PRACBCES (BMP'S), AS REWIRED BY ME STATE WA1EA RESWRCES CONTROL BOARD, FOR ANY ACDWtt, WHICX dSNRBS SOIL 13 ALL ROOF BEANS AND/dt DOWNSPWTS SHALL BE DRNNED SHEET FLOW 2x AWAY FROM ME BUILDING AND MAYBE COLLECTED BY DRNNAGE INLET COENECTED TO PUBUC STORM DRNN FAdUtt. IF AND ONLY IF 1FE DRNNACE IS N ME NILJSAE AREA CAN ME WATER 6E dRECTLY CONNECTED TO ME PUBUC STORM DRNN. SRE NAINTENACE: i. CONTRACTOR TO GAMER ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS W A REWUR BASIS AND PUCE IT IN A OUMPSTER OR OMER CONTAINER W}ABI IS ENPDEO OR REMOVID W A REWUR BA51£ WHEN APPROPRIATE USE TARPS ON ME CWAND TO COLLECT FALLEN D®RIS OR 51'U1TER5 MAi COULD CONTRIBUTE TO STBEM WATER RUNOFF POLLUTION. 2 CONTRACTOR TO SWFID CR VAWUM ME STREET PAVEMENT ANO SIDEWALKS ADJBNING ME PROJECT SITE AND ME ON-SITE PAVID AREAS ON A DAILY BASIS. SCRAPE CAKED-ON MUB AND DIRT FROM MESE ARUS BffORE SWffPING. CORNERS AND HARD TO REACH AREAS SHALL BE SWEPT MANUALLY. 1 CONTRACTOR TO SWEEP Olt VAWUM ME STREET PAVEMENT ANO SIDEWALKS ADJBNING ME PROJECT SIZE AND ME ON-SIZE PAYED AREAS ON A ONLY BASE SCRAPE CAKED-ON MUD PND DIRT FROM MESE ARUS BffORE SNEEPING CORNERS AND HARD TO REACH ARUS SHALL BE SWEPT MANUALLY. 4. IF ME STREETS, SIDEWALKS ANO/OR PARING LOT AAE PRESSURE WASHED, DEBPoS MUST BE TRAPPED ANO COLL.ECIED TO PREVENT ENTRY INTO ME STORM DRNN SYSTELI. NO GFANNG AGENT MAY BE DISCHARGED NTO ME STORM GRAN. IF ANY GFANING AGENT OR DECRUSER I$ USED, WASH WAIEA MUST BE CBIECTED AND DISCHARGED TO ME SANITARY SEWER, SUBJECT TO ME APPROVAL OF ME CITYS ENGNEER OR INSPECTOR, OR OMERWSE DISPOSED OF MROUdi APPROVED DISPOSAL MEMOD£ S. CRUTE A CONTNNED AND COVERED AREA ON ME 511E FOR ME STORAGE OF BAGS, CEMENT, PLANTS, BLS, FERIIUZERS, PESIIBDES, OR OMER MATERIALS USED W 11# 511E MAi HAVE ME POIENDAL OF BONG dSCHARGm INTO ME STORM DRNN SYSTEM MRWCH BMER BEING HIND-BLONN OR N ME EVENT OF A MATERIAL SPILL 6. NEVER CLEAN MACWNERY, EWIPMENT OR TOOLS NTO A STRE17, WTTER OR STORM DRAIN. 7, CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE MAT CEMENT TRUCKS, PANTERS, DA SNCCO/PUSTER FlNISHINC CONTRACTORS DO NOT DSCHARCE WASH WATER FROIJ EWIPMENT, 7T)OL5 OR RNSE CONTAINERS INTO WTTERS OR BENNS. B. TN1CE A YEARSASRFOLLOWS FMBMEDIAIELY PPoOA TOOCTOBERL115MUAND ONCE IN JANUARY. ADDITIONAL dfANING MAY BE REQUIRED IF FWND NECESSARY BY ME dTYS ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COSTS ASSOdATED WM CLEANING 9. CONIRACTBt TO PREVENT DUST FROM LUMNG ME SITE AND ACWMUUDNG ON ADJACENT AREAS AS REWIRED IN THE DUST CONTROL NOTES ON MIS SHEET. 10. CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT SEDIMENT OEBINS STORM RUN-OFF FROM LEANNG ME SITE OR ENTERING STORM DRAIN OR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS AS REQUIRED IN ME EIEOSION AND SEOIMENTADON CONTROL NOTES ON MIS SXfET. 11, MNNTNN E%IS11NC TREES AND PLANTS MAT AAE TO REMAIN AS REWIRED BY ME TREE ANO PUNT PADTECTION NOTES ON MS SHEET. DUST CONTROL: 1. WATER TRUCKS SHAH BE PRESENT AND IN USE AT ME CON51RUC110N SITE ALL PORTIONS OF ME SITE SUB,ECT TO BLOMMG DUST SHALL 6E WATERED A5 OFTEN AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY ME diY ENBNEER MANAGER IN ORDER TO INSURE PROPER CBJIRW OF BLONING OUST FOR ME WRADBV OF ME PROJECT. 2 WATERING ASSCCIAIFD YAM ON-511E CONSTRUCTION ACDWTY SHALL TAKE PLACE BETWffN ME HWRS OF 8:00 AM AND 7:00 PM AND SHALL INCWDE AT LEAST ONE UTE-AFTERNOON WATERING TD MINIMIZE ME EFFECTS OF BLOMING DUS1. 3. ALL PUBUC STREETS AND MEDIANS SBLID OR UTTERED DVE TO MIS CONSTRUCTION AC11Wtt SHALL BE CLUNED ANO SWEPT ON A ONLY BA9S DUAINO ME WORKMEIX, OR AS OFTEN AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY ME diY ENGINEER, TO ME SATISFACTION OF ME dTYS ENBNEER INSPECTOR. 4. WATERING ON PUBUC STREllS OA POWER WASHING $EBMENTABON ON STREETS SHALL NOT DCWR, UNLESS CONTRACTOR COLLECTS AND FlLTERS THE WASH WATER PRIOR TO ITS ENTERING ME dTYS STORM DAMN SYSTEM. 5. ON-97E PAVED ACCESS ROADS, PARKING AREAS, AND STAGNG AREAS SHALL BE SWEPT ONLY MM A WATER SWEEPER. 6. ALL TRUCKS HAWNC SBL SAND, AND OMER LOOSE MATERIALS SHALL BE COVERED VAM TARPAULINS OR OMIR EFFECTIVE COVIIt£ 7. ME SPEED OF ALL VEHICLES DRINNG ON UNPAVED ROADS OR PORTIONS OF ME SITE SHALL BE UM1W TD 15 MPH. 8. WHEEL WASHERS SHALL 6E INSTALLED AND USED TO CLEAN ALL TRUCKS AND EDUIPMENTS LUMNG ME CONSTRUCDBJ SITE IF NHEEL WASHERS CANNOT BE INSTALLED, ORES OR TRAQfS W ALL TRUCKS AND EWIPMENT SHALL BE WASHED OFF BffORE LUMNC ME CONSTRUCWON SITE EROSION 8 SEDINENTA110N CONTROL NOTTS: 1. EROSION CONTROL NUSUAES ARE IN1ENOm TO PREVENT SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM ENTERING ME dtt STORIA DRNN SYSTEM, SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM OR FROM LFAWNC TFE SITE ME CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ADJUSTMENTS IN ME FlELD TO MANE SURE MAT MIS CONCEPT IS CARRIED WT. 2 EROSION CONTROL FABLI06 AND MUSUAES ARE TO BE INSTALLED AND OPERABLE BY OCTOBER 1H (OR WIMIN A PERIOD OF MREE WEEKS AFTER ME START OF CONSTUUCDW ACTIWDES, E MAT START IS BETWEEN OCTOBER AND MAY) AND SHALL CONDNUE IN EFFECT UNTL JUNE tat OR UNTIL INSTALUDON OF ME PERMANENT 511E IMPROVEMENTS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME ME CONCEPTS ON ME EROSIBE CONTROL PLAN, SHEET CS.1, ARE SCHEMATIC MINIMUM REWIREMENTS, ME FULL E%TEEET aF WrBCH ARE TO BE DETERMNED BY ME CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ME E%ACT DESIGN AND LATENT OF ME ER090N CONTROL SYSTEM SO MAT IT WORKS IWM ME CONIRACTOR5 INTENDED USE ANO MANAGEMENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE 4. ALL EROSION CWIROL FAdUDES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY ME CONTRACTOR ANO REPNRED, AS REWIRED, AT ME CONCWSI011 OF EACH WORKING OAY DURING ME RAINY SEASON. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT ME EROSIgI CONTROL FAdUTIES AND MAKE NECESSARY REPNRS PRIOR TO ANTIBPATm STORMS AND AT REASONABLE INTERVALS DURING STORMS OF EXTENDm DUAAl10N. REPNRS TO DAMAGES FACILITIES SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY UPON DISCOVERY. 5. AS SOON AS PRACTICAL FO.LAWING EACH STORM, ME CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ANY ACWNUUTION OF SILT OR DEBPoS FROM ME EROSION CONTROL SEDIMENT BASKS AND SHALL CLEAR ME WTLET PIPES OF ANY BLOdfAGE 8. PROWAON SHALL BE MADE TO ASSURE MAT BORROW ARUS AND STOdf PILED SdLS ARE PROTECTED FROIA EROSIBI, MIS SHALL AT A MINUMUN CONSIST OF COVERING THE AREAS N1M PU511C SHEETING. 7. PRIOR TO ME CdIMENCENENT OF ANY CLEARING, GRADING, OR IXCAVADON, ME CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY MAT ME OWNER HA5 SUBMITTED TO THE STATE WATER RESOUflCES CONTROL BOARD A NO11CE OF INTENT (Nd) FCR COVERAGE UNDER ME STATE CONSTRUCTION STORM WRIER p]YERAL PERMIT. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL MNNTNN A COPY OF ME NB W THE CONS7RUC710N SIZE 7AEElPLANT PR0IT~TION NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO BEdNNING CdI51RUCDON ON 51E CONTRACTOR SHALL IDENTIFY AND PROTECT EIASRNG TREES AND PLANTS OEdCNATED AS TO REMAN. 2 PROMDE 6 F00T TALL TREE PROTECTION FENCE 1WM dS11NCTIVE MARKING WSIBLE TO CON5IRUCBON EWIPMENT, ENCLOSING DRIP ONES OF TREES DESIGNATED TO REMAIN. 3. WORK REQUIRED MIMIN FENCE LINE SHALL BE HELD TO A MINIMUM, AVOD UNNECESSARY MOVEMENT OF HEAVY EWIPNENT MMIN FENCED AREA AND 00 NOT PARK YEFIICLES NM IDLE RUNNING ENGINES UNDER DRIP UNE OF TREES 4. PRIOR TO REMOWNC R0015 AND BRANCHES LARGER MAN 2' IN DIAMETER dF TREES OR PLANTS MAT ARE TO RENNN CWSULT YAM ME LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 5. ANY GRADE CHANGES dEUTER MAT 6' NIMIN ME DPoPLINE OF EIOSTING TREES SHALL NOT BE MADE WTHWT FlRST CONSULTING ME LWDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE fi. PROTECT IXISIING TREES TO REMNN FROM SPILLED CHEMICALS, FUEL dL, MOTOR dL, CASWNE AND ALL OMER CHEMICALLY INJURIWS MATERIAL; AS Mfl1 AS FROM PUBBIINC OR CONTINUOUSLY RUNNING WATER. SHOULD A SPILL OCCUR, STOP WORK IN MAT AREA AND CONTACT THE d7Y5 PROTECT MANAGER IMMEDIATELY. CONIRACTBE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO MITIGATE DAMAGE FROM SPILLED MATERIAL AS WELL AS MATERUL CLEAN UP. 7. PflOWDE TEMPORARY IRRIGATION TO ALL TREES AND PLANTS MAT ARE IN OR ADJACEIT TO CONSTRUCTON AREAS NHERE E%ISBNG IARIGA710N SYSTEMS MAY BE AFFECTED BY ME CONSTRUCTION, ALSO PROVDE TEMPORARY IRRICADW TO flELOCAIED TREES. 6, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ONCONG NNNTENANCE OF ALL TREES DEAGNATED TO REMNN ANO FOR MNNTENANCE OF RELOCATED TREES STOdtPILED DURING CONSTRUC110N. CONTRACTOR VALL BE REWIRED TO REFUGE TREES MAT DIE OUE TD LACK OF MNNTENANCE oEwoLmoN NorES: 1. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND CLEARLY MARK (AND MEN PRESERVE THESE MARKERS) FOR ME WRAl10N OF CONSTRUCTON OF ALL TELEPHONE, DATA, STREET UGHL SIGNAL LIGHT AFA POKER fAdUDES MAT ARE IN OA NEAR ME AREA OF CONSTRUCTION. 2 CONTRACTORS BID IS TO NCLUDE ALL WSIIWE SURFACE AND ALL SUBWRFACE FUNRES IDENDFlED TO BE REMDYID OR ABANDONED IN MESE DIX%1NEN1S. 3. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FdE A SITE INSPECTION TO FULLY ACKNOWLEDGE ME E%iENT OF ME DEMOLITION WORK. 4. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPW£BLE Fdt OBTNNING ANY AND ALL PERMITS NECESSARY FOR ENCROACHMENT, GRABNG, OEMd1TI0N, AND DISPOSAL OF SAID MATERIALS AS REWIRED BY PRIVATE, IACAL AND STATE JJRISDICTIONS. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY ALL FEES ASSOdATED WIM ME DENWDON WDAK. 5. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL HAZARDWS MATERIALS FRBA THE EXISTING BUBDING AS IDENDFlED IN ME SPEGFlCAlI0N5. WORK AND DISPOSAL SHALL BE DONE IN A MANNER AS SPECIFlED IN ME SPECIFlCADONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSNTLE FOA ME EXEW110N, PERMITS AND FEES ASSOdATED YAM MIS WORK. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY DISPOSAL FEES. 7. BACKFlLL ALL DEPRESSIONS AND 1RENCHES FROM OEMOUDON TO ME SABSFAC110N aF ME SOL ENBNEEA. 6. YAMIN LIMITS aF WOPo(, REMOVE WRBS, WTIERS, LANDSCAPING, SICNAGE TREES, SHRUBS, ASPHALT, UNDERCRWND PIPES, ETC. AS INBCAIED ON ME DRANNGS. 9. REMOVAL OF UNDSCAPINC MALL NCWOE ROOTS AND ORGANIC MATERIALS TO ME SATISFACTION OF ME SdLS ENBNFFR. EROSION 8 SEDIMENTA710N CONTROL N07ES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PRONDE A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AROUND ME EN71RE AREA OF DEMW110N AND CONSTRUCTION, INCWDING ALL STAGING, STORAGE, CONSTRUCTIW OFFlCE ANO UYDOWN AREAS. 2 FENCE LOCATION MAY BE ADJUSTED FROM DME TD THE AS CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDS TO IXCWOE SOME AREAS WHERE CONSTRUC710N WORK IS NOT BEING DONE AND ME ARU IS NOT OBJEC110NABLE IN VSUN. APPEARPNCE 3. CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF A 6' HIGH GALVANIZm CHNN LINK WM GREEN YANDSCREEN FABRIC W ME OUTSIDE OF ME FENCE 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFUGE ME BEEEN FABRIC AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR OR AT SUdI A 11ME AS IT BECOMES TATTERED AND UNSIGHTLY DUE TO 'MND OA CONSTRUCTION AC11Ntt. 5. CONSTRUCDBE FENCE ADDRESSED IN THESE NOTES IS ONLY FOR MSUAL CONFORMANCE OF MI5 CONSIRUC7IW SITE TD ME dtt STANDARDS. CONTRACTOR NAY REWIRE ADDIBWAL FENBNG, BARRICADES OR OMER SAFETY DEWCES TO KEEP ME SITE SECURE k SAFE. GRADING NOTES: 1. ALL PAVID AREAS ARE TO SLOPE A MINIMUM OF if AND MA%IMUM OF Bx ACCESSIBLE STAUS ANO LOADING ZONES ARE TO SLOPE AT A NA70MUM OF 2x AND ACCESSIBIF PAMWAYS ARE TO SLOPE AT A MAXMUM OF 5% IN THE DIRECTION W TRAVfl. AND ME SLOPE CROSSWAYS TO ME DIRECTION OF TRAVEL SHALL BE AT A MA%IMULI OF 2f. ANY AREAS ON ME SITE NOT CONFORNINC TO MESE BASIC RULES WE TO EXISDNC CONdDONS OR pSCREPANdES IN ME DOCUMENTS AFE TO BE AEPORIm TD TIE ENBNEER PRIOR TO PROC®ING WM PUCEMENT OF ROCK BASE, FORMWORK FOR WRBS AND/OR FUTWORK. 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE EARMWJRK WAN011ES BASED ON TIE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, ME SBLS INVE571GADON AND ME PROPOSED SURFACE MICKNESSES AND BASE ME BID ACCORDINGLY. NOTE MAT A SEPARATE DEMOLITION CONTRACT HAS BEEN ISSUED TO TAKE ME 9TE FRdI ME WAY IT IS AT ME BNE OF ME BID TO ME CONDITIONS DESCRIPBED IN MESS DOWMENT£ ANY DIFFERENCES BETNEEN ME STATE IN WHN01 ME SITE IS OELJYERED TO ME CONTRACTOR AND MESE DOCUMENTS SHWID BE NOTED TO ME ENBNFFR. 3. ALL FlLL SHALL BE COMPACTED PER ME ShcS REPORT ANO ME CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ANO COMPLY WM ME OWNERS TESDNG AGENCY TD TAKE ME APPROPRIATE TESTS TO VE18FY CBAPACDg1 VALUES. 4. IMPORT SdLS SHWLD MEET ME REWDEMENTS OF ME SOILS REPORT k SPECIFlCADONS. 5. COORDNATE ME PUCEIAENT OF ALL SLEEVES FOA LANDSCAPE FRICADON (WATER AND CONTROL NRINC) AND 9TE UdiDNG PRIOR TD ME PUCEMENT OF ANY ASPHALT, BASEROCK OR CONCRETE WRFABNG. SEE UNDSCAPINC AND SIZE ELECTRICAL DRANINCS. 6. 00 NOT ADJUST GRADES ON MIS PLAN N1MWT PRIOR NPoTIEN APPROVAL OF ME ENBNEEA. 7• SITE STRIPPINCS MAT CONTNN ONLY ORGANIC MATERIAL (NO DEBRIS TRASH, BROKEN GONG OR ROCKS GREATER MAN i' IN DIAMETER) MAY BE USED IN LANDSCAPE AREAS E%CEPT FOR AREAS IDENIIFlED AS IMPdET TOP SBL BY ME LANDSCAPE DRAYANCS. IXCESS SBdPPINCS SHALL ~ REMOVED FROM SITE fi. SPOT ELEVATION AAE TO FINISHED SURFACE B. TOP OF CONCRETE CURBS ARE 0.50' ABOVE TOP OF PAWNC EIEVATNXIS, U.N.O. 10. ROUGH GRADING TO BE W1MIN 0.1' AND FlNISH GRADES ARE TO lE WIMIN 0.05', HOWEVER CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT CONSTRUCT ANY BAPROVENENTS MAT HILL CAUSE WATER TO POND OA NOT MEET REWIREIAENTS IN GRADING NOTE /1. GENERAL URLTTY SYSTEM NOIT~I 1. ALL 1RENCHES SHALL BE BACKFlLIID PER THE SdLS REPORT NIM APPROPPoAIE 1E5T5 TO VERIFY COMPACTION YAWE£ 2 BEAN WTS, CATCH BASINS AND AREA DRNNS ARE TO BE ACWRATELY LOCATED BY HEIR AFLADONSHIP TO ME BUILDING, FUTWORK, ROOF DRNNS, AND/OH WRB UYWL NOT BY ME LENCM OF PIPE SPEGFlID IN ME DRAWINGS (WHICH IS APPROXIMATE). J. SEE PWMBINC DRAWNGS FOR CONIINUADON OF UDLIDES MMIN ME BUILDNG. 4. ALL PROPOSED UDUTES SHALL BE INDERGRWND, UNLESS SPEBFlCALLY CALIID WT AS ENTERING ME FACE OF ME BUILDING. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE LOCATION OF ABOVE GRWND UDUtt EWIPMENT (BACKFLOW PREVENTOR, ETC.) AND MEET WM dtt ENdNFER AND PROJECT ENBNEER TD RENEW LOCATION PRIOR TD INSTALUl10N. PLANNING DEPARTMENT MUST SPECfICALLY AGREE WM LOCATION PRIOR TO PRDCEETNNG NM ME INSTALUDW. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AN ACWRATE COMPOSITE UBUtt PLAN THAT TAKES INTO ACCWNT ME ACTUAL LDCADON OF EXISTING U/1U11E5 AS DEIERMNED DUPoNG ME DEMWDON WORK, ME UDUIIES SHOWN ON ME dNL DRAWNCS, ANO ME SITE POWER, CONDUITS AND LI(YEBNC SHOWN ON ME ELECTRICAL PLANS. ME FlRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE INCWDED AS DESIGNED BY ME DESICN/BUILO UNDERCRWND FlRE SPRNKLER CONTRACTOR. 7. FOR CRANtt FLOW SYSTEMS CONTRACTOE SHALL VERIFY (POMOLE IF NECESSARY) SIZE, MATQtIA4 LOCATION ALA DEPM OF ALL SYSTEMS MAT ARE TO BE CONNECTED TD OR CROSSED PRIOR TO ME TRENCHING OR INSTALUDON ff ANY GRAWtt FLOW SYSTEM. B. CAMODIC PROTECTION IS REWIRED ON ALL METAWC FlTTINGS AND ASSEMBLIES MAT ARE IN CONTACT YAM ME 5dL CWTRACTCR IS RESPONSIBLE TC FULLY ENBNEER AND INSTALL MIS SYSTEM ANO COORDINATE ANODE AND TEST STATION LOCATIONS VWM dTYS PROTECT MANAGER. 9. COMPLETE SYSTEMS: ALL UTIUtt SYSTEMS ARE DELJNUTm IN A SCHEMATIC MANNER ON MESE PUNS CONTRACTOR IS TO PROMDE AIL FlTDNGS, ACCESSORIES AND WORK NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE UTILITY SYSTEM SO MAT IT IS FULLY FUNCTIONING FOR ME PURPOSE IN1ENDm. ~' o ~ n Y A v a ~m`a yj I I °og~mm ~~'~ m~~BB ~~ m~ ^! ~:~ Q Z K O Q U N Q F Z ~NZo U ZN<Q ~. =ZQ wa~Z a N 8 1 C-2 2 OF O Z F 0: a U ~i L V N N # U N O~ N ~ W N 4 NN G1 N u ~ W N . ~ Ag >tn ><Y u~.vm °~ o ~ m ~ m a >AIQ > $° L A a ~o{ >n o LL ~~F~~ ~~ ~gQQ ~AC ~z$ 9~$c ~'~c~~ m c~c ~~~ ~m~ = o o > o>;~ F ego ~ zo~~ ~~~ ~g=~ C ~~ `d> 6 ~~~o~ ~~~ ~~ ~m~~ ° n^7~~ tnoo c>iood~°z ~ ~~_ ~ y>o >~ ~~im L e c m ~o g ~?c G ~; ~>o ~'yoc y ~ ~~~_ Fir ~>° fli z mm ° >A CFA ~ ~ a ~.~' ~ ~zc ~f z m m a ~Pi~ ~ m~t7i C ~m g~~ ~~- ! ~~n ~4~i~ ~. ~~ ~ z ~ m fc ~a~ L ppz> >s r4~ S f ~ ~ ~ c~c =o ~ °c ~^~ ~ ~ ->+~ ~ zg zQ ~~~ 7i a z g~ >g ~~fnn ~fn~ 'ii~~ P -~`'~ ~~$°'" I ~ v m ~' > E ; ~ ffl °; S g m ~z ~ ~ io ~ ~~i~ ~i ~~n ~n- ~ ~ s z mzz~ \ 3 ~ >L m ~n s~ > = p ~ 4'su7 v7 ~n>~ z~ Lv ~ ~ ~ Qi~z z c~z tL Tz N yy y>y' >'pp ¢ p ~ 'p r1i > y y~ r~y° ~ acf ~ ~ pvL ~YI~~o ~ ,PJPr Zm~ TLOC Z~~N >~Ag Ci 71~o_C m ~yFI S~z~ 71ZC ~ c C ~~~ Ty m0mmp ~m~ zm°N s tn ~ n m~ N Z C m ~ O Z m > < $ Z° ~ Z 2 ~ Z N ~ = Z N OZ ~ y \ m K ~ m C L m ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ° ° > > A ,1 ; ~ C ~~ ~~ Alo S g ~ ~ ~~~ > N hhS11 ° ~ o~~l~~ m~ °S~ zA'-~ ~°~2 ~°pS~ ~$~z~ ~ _~S "~ ~~ sm z $ r C gz g~ ~ ~ t~ 3~~~~ $~ra 1~z ~ -'"i'~' ~ ~z °~_ <S~~ F1 m v ~s_A p..~.~ fs z oA Z m ° z m N L_ cm i y pp m O op ~> ~ ~~~f/1 L m .Umm >z~'^ vt~m = m~ m~ ~°D `" " ~ ~~8 = ~ ~ m m~ \ ~ ~ ~~ ~C~ i ~AN ~ AN 9 y~i~ [~. ~cQ €v7~ m ~o~ $ 4v Oi ~4mp1 Q >E~ o $ `^ "'°~ Pc 7~ ~~~ cmtl &~ 4! z ~'° Ti,> ° ~'®' ~iir Om~ oYdp ~_o ~~f~ m o >~ o ~m1 °>1i ° c> ~ °~ o ~' °o m>NN ~ ~+ ~$ ~~ Q°y~1m >~ ~~ F>ooor~ ~ ~p~ Z~c~f ~~ ~~~~ z~~~ fA ~pfL s~ [=7~~ ~ ~~S>p ~ m¢~ ~~~ mmA~ °~r Sd gf~~ Ji~Cm C~~ oLF '^~~~ ~ ~> y T,y`~ ~ z~ R ~~ L°°-q ~~ Y'cg~ j ~ ~ >Lrif c y b ~7- ~ ~ ~u7 m~c~ <ma z rfLgn-~ m ~,~ry. s ~~m ~~ -,; gm~ ~°~~ b~~ in ~~{ Q ~ >v nF~ F ~FJ~ ~b$~ {gczi ~ ~i ~Q' ~y~9pF ~ ~~b I~Qz_ ~m Z~~y ~ ~g~ ~ $Z~ ~m~~ ~~~~ 8~y <L ~ ~ g m ~~r ~ ~AO mQ>` °yQ°,~ ~~v g~ z5#~gZ ~~~~~ fi~-a ~; _z g ~ a~ ~ y>y~~ mQrQ~ gC~ ~ to mFi L~ '^ ~ F^ A t9i z ~Q>E rc `s~"~ z'.6 Lm° _c~~ ~~ °SFr= m~ LlT Tv ~~ °~=p Lz ,~^ z~ ~5~d~ Fi jEg~ u"'I rz ~~m p~ F>~ ~ ° A ~ ~ ~ 1Q~ m ~ ~ _ ~ vQ y~c~m Qm>~F~1 ~m> 8A y Ozr~ sN m ~~m ~L~L'~~ N~~O g$~ m< to [~' '~ ~~g v~~ ~~~ °~~ ~~m a~ oF=o =~C=~j25 ~~t ~ ~~~~ ~ mgg ~~ ~~ g~e~ ~°~~ g~~ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~',~' ~~ "'gip ~"~ ~~ ~~~~ o~~ ~_> ~ y~~~1(ryyl ~ A!~ ,y,2 mi ~~`~ omOq ~~.~ ~~ ~~ m 2z1 ~ZZ ~iN ~~m p~ < o~(ib~ ~~ ~mgi g~>e p ~~p c~zi yZ A ~n SypQ~~~m m~ +n~~1 jSm~ p~ci ~Q ~~ N I, li Y' 4 m LVI' p~~~ Cam' ~jN ~ C Py ZA ~i~g g Zo~ >~ ~~ j§r$ ~1~~~ ~ C° S ~ ~m~ ~^~~ Z~Z ~~y,Q ~~~ ~~ ~~FJ~ pF+zi 4°~ p~m !L2;' m LL ~j Qp F ~~ ~° m m m > ~ ~ ~m air m F g gotl,a m m w N w N m QQ 1 ~ ~ ~LL ~p ~{Q a Z ~o5y~~ m '~ `~ ~ ~'~ LLm~' ° ~ c F AFi Fi ~~Q' Z ~~z ~ ~ is n ~ ~~ Fn°Y! ~iQ ~ ~m> ~ g m ~Qo~ ~ ~m~m~ T ~~ S o ~~ ~~~g ~~ ~ N4~ y~ P~ m ~~C~ a m~p~ ~ Qm r4i ~ ~° N~z$ mTZ m 8~4 ~~ ~° pO ~ ~$~g ~ ~ ~ ~ czi~o o+~o ~° ~ ~A9~ ~~ ~ m ~~ ~>~~~ ~ ~ ~m ~ ~~ ~ ~ _~~ R C z~nY °~~U ~ Zq~qq ± ~ off' ~8 ~ ~J '~ 6 ° y P°1m 5~ ~m>~ ~ ou ~_ ~g fnQ m° ~ Y S~ ~~~~ ~ ~ gN~ ~ ~~ y p ~ (L°~~ = N~Z ++N ~ ppO>T~ jn ~A N y>~ ~L m~>~ O ~ Crm rZ j~ ~> 1~1 o SQ ^~~ Sm ~ ~ VNI '22L~$ Z c I I I I m LL ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ m a ~® q ~ g g O~ y x i A ~ +~ ° v n'~ Q m ~ ~ vi ~ri O f``Jl,,t, x ~c A z m f to °~ ~ G I _ IIIIIIIII~~III!I ° f... ^ m o ~'®~~ j~llllllllllll~~~~~ ICI ~ i R~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~; ~ o ~ x s m ~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~g ~ ~gv i~m~~Q~c~~~`d8f 70°0 x ~x -,=x~=$ ~ ~ S ~ s w ~ D m ~~ L ~ 2 Z y ~ ° ~ ~~~~m=~~~~~g~o~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~g~ ~ ~ ~ ~% ~ _ ~m ~~ ~~ ~ _ ~m ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z «o"~~, N` "~'"' CUPERTINO OAKS W ~ o ~« „~ ~ 981 RIDDER PARK DRNE ~ w € °"'°° PHASE 2 ;~ ~ ~ G 9s,~, Appev~O:NBP ~ 408-487-9199 NOTES AND LEGEND ~ `~'-'67-9100 cFA~) ~ ~oeofa CUPERTINO SANTA CLARA COUNTY CALIFORNIA ~~~ll~rr~~u~~ ® BKF ENGINEERS 11 I~ \~~ ~ °• I1V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ii'a 1 e 1t / ~ ,~ ~"~1~~ ° " ',~; i~~ 1 L. . ~1, ~~,~ `~ ~ ~~ ,~ k`~~I~~11~~ v ~~~ `'~ ~1~~ sets' t ~1'1 ~ 111 ~~` "AAAttt ~`,` I i \ ~'}`1~`II '~ ~ `e ~,',~~Ul~~ll aiv ~ p1 ~~i~ ,~. 1 1 11 \~ i..~ ~ ~; I \ `~. ~~.. . ~i `~~°' ~,, `~~ a s \ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~g"m agosm & •• mvi~~i s :~ N 1~ ^~ GRAPHIC SCALE '~ l a rar 1 ~~' na> l drab • N M1 Q9Lru CC,CIa.'Cp~ Y ~~ ~ I agAS ~ LAOUI.p C-0SCUFCp pY a 11 ~~ ~ DENSE IAEES ~ 1 ~ x es ~~\ ~ Y Q ~ / ~ ?. /' _ ~ _„y_-r~FuiACES Q `~ 1 ja`1 1` 'I `-~~. ~- ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ , i ~ ~_ ~.. Ane JJ 1 Z ~ ~., ~ ~ ~ nv ~ \ ` , ~~ ~ \pAOtmp o3cuAO at ~ I F Q V U `~~~~ ~, __ \~1 ~ tTF ~ .Oa '~^' ~o~+n opscuAm pr ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~y ,, ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~~i I \L ~~ ~~ ~ ~ I i 1, o ~ `` ~'• \ nx~~~ 'P`' ~s~~,~~~~ da nlxslla¢s ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ z ~ a ll ~ ~ _. ~ ~ ~ F I~ ~a I ~vi Q 1, ~. IInLq~' it 1 ~GR ~I~ (9~ E-2Y ~~ ~~ ~vf, ~,I ~Y~,.~ - ... II i ,1 i ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~. w ma ..~i-A v.. ~~ ~ ~ .,~~ i ~qJ, y~ ~ 1A U ,.l.,e '~ ade,e t ~, :~ m~ ~_~'I ' Ewa ~~ ~///r',~ z V1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~` ~~~~ ~ ~~ ' ~ a -- ,~ q ~Y~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ l ~ ~s~, ~ ~ ~ ° ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~Y k ~ ~ ', ~ , y ,~ ~ ~ ~a ~~ ~ / ~~~ _"3trae rA¢s ~ ' ~ ~' "•" ~\ ~ ~ ~ ~~ \ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ' 4 ~° k ~~.Im° I ~ f ~.~ ~~\ - ~ ~ ., _.-l / I, t me•~* 5 e -+r I f ~ l ~ . L ~I ~ ~' .~ ~ otusc ,alts .. ~2' ~ /~ ~ i ~ i --- ~ 9 --- JV ~~ i X95_ \ A na, \ \~ ass .~yl \ ~ ~~`` r 4p~8 tR our rur 1 nt~l,~, ~~ , ~ ~ ~ 1 Q ~ 1 ~' z 1, 1 ~ ~ \ ~„ r\ ~ ~ ~ o~ouTiaR ROTES: ~ h i \ ~~ 1~ 1~ p" ~ V'~ QI Rwo~ TREE ~~ ~~ 1~ ^~;.. \ ~ R~\\~£3 ~ e_g~s~ 11` 2 REM04E AC w dam i1 ~ '~ 11'~' 1~ t]NP~\I ~\\ \ 1 ~ ~ O~~nm ,1`l`1,, \ _ 03 RtlA04E ElEC7R0UFR ~ g I` l1 ' ~ 1~ 1111111`I'! ~ • • ~ ~A\~ \~ \\~11 1 ~~ 04 RELOCATE TAANSFORRER PAD ' n~~~$ ~\ ; ~ `~ R ~~ ~ r ~~~11~ h'~. ~~Jr ,~, n ~, ~,, ~ ~. 1 1 `I \ ~ \ G~ r T ~ \~' '~ . i ~~ ~ ~ ~1~It ~~ ~ = ,,,,,.. ~ ~, . ~t _ , \ .. ,, ~, , ~ ' ~~ ~ ~ ` e, ~ ~~ ~> ,~ ~illl \ 11,~~`, 1~. ~ ~ ~NSE T~E~~\~\I ~ . ,..._. cRAPffic ec~ _ 1 1~ / \ _ \ \ 1 +11111 n ~, O \~ 1 , ~ / ~ 1 ~\ ~\ '~ ~\~~ eels ~ ~ ~. \ 1 1mY .10 R FAl ,~~ • ~ 1 ~~,~I~ ~1 ~~ >:r. 3 y, oo ,A ,\; ~~_~ ~~r-~?`o~" ~ ~ ~ ~ a~.w ®seu~m m ~~ ,e~., ~~ eRm_n ensmrxn is ~ 1 \, V! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ .-aa5 =,~ ~ g[N3[ 7AEES `H : ~ ~ '\ K ~ ~ NM 1 \~ 1'll 11 ~~, I A I\ eFf\ ~ I i j~~ ,~~ '~ ~~ ~~ ~`2 ~ ~~~ ~ 1~J~ `~.NFS.TAEE7 J e ~ \, nil n l! , !~ >,. ~ ~~~ ~ - ~ -~_ ~~~~• •.~ ;~° ~ ~. m~• \ `~11 111 'xxs Wn i~ / e ~ .a' .r, 1 \.~ ~•,.u •`s .Fein ., 11 ~~aJ ,`\\ 11 111 i ~ ! ` ~ ~ R ~i _ • _` ,\ .\ ,:., y,;^ _i M i 11 ti.t a ~ ~ ~1 i~ % 3 ~ ens ~ `~ ((I °C,••.. r r• ~~ ~' 1 `} ¢9`p~a~ ~ , ~ ~'~"~- ~~ ~ ~ (`~' ` '1 ~ 1 1~1~~ 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ /~V F4../ ~ ` DENSE TREES \~ , ~ ~ 11 IF~ ~'~ '~ 1 , .~~ 11 V ` 1; 1~1~~s.:~ ~ i'~ l`' \; -~ ~~ • \ / .xw I i Z }} 11 zF' L 1 ~ 1 i ~. l ,r yn zFFa ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ C : ~ 4 Y ea o ~ i < F 1 1 mF IR - ~\ e~ \~ \ J 1~ ` ` SII'11u zeF '. .Rms "~ ~ s d• 1 1 ~., ~ ~}' f \' .F~" n': ~~~~\;\ \ \ F% 0 N a~ ~~~ ~ i ~t~ ~1~1 ~~ ~ ~~ ~o°~ iFFe a '~. ~ ~ ~ ~ . e ~ ~ ex ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ z~.'F~ ~ ~I F'F' ~ S'" ~ ~ ~\ ~~~ ~ lj' ~ a ~ O ~~ ~~. ~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~r ~ ~ 1 ~-1-~~1 ~1 1 1. ' ,~g~. FRF ~••~ ~( ~~,'~~~ ~ ese: %~ ~ ~ ~ N CK ~~ 1` 1 ' ,Fes,, \~ ~ ~, GYqu'W O~CURE7 er ` Q "e' ~` ~`I1'1 `~~' .Jma - , M17~1 TO j ,/ 1 ~ 1 .m ~y~ ~ \`~ lltNYk~ Ihke1 I I ~ x J 1 'k 1 11~ X11 ^ EY0.~ `V(r- Fe" 1 CAF, ~zs.F 1 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1YAl0 SF • ~ 't ~ ~ ~~~~~ < A, ~~ r ~ W ``` Fra~~\ I i • .~ z ~ ~ -~\ .RF\ ` ~ : ~ ~ ~~ • ~ 1\ l ~ I 1 110 \ \1 ~;~ V A W :~~` 1 ~ xl; ~ -~ ~ ~ ,~ \ \ F `,~\ ~` `~ 1 19O 1~`1 2Re 1 ~• `~\ 1 1~ ~ 8 PHASE 1 - U aw - ~ ~ ~ '~ \ y 1 '~ ' ~'e '~ 1 I •'W' ~o~ F.•D~' amrmossaRmar ~, t ~ \ ~ ~ ~~ 1' i1 1 ~!_ ,1d ~ `~\ ~ Q l ~ y ~ , ~"'C xNSe4R¢s ~ Fe.'" /~ ~ ~~ - ~.,\e\ ~1 111 ,s 1 1~'1 .1, ~ ~~ ~a~\ 1 ,-~ l e0°e• sza "~"~~ , e ~ ,~ XY i ~, ~saam ar,~1~ ~', ~ ~1 ~~~~~ i . ~~ 1 1 ~~ _ ~' ~ I 1!i p 1~ 1 i . U ~ ' i annr a ~ 1~ ~~ A n,,, t~ ,;a xxsE TRas ~ J ~ I ~ l!. A Z ~ ~ ~ i S C % ~1 i rol~ioru~ ~ ro / /~ ~~a g~ ~ ~' 11 ~ 1, I~!~ F- II 1 J,70 1~Rna 1 ~n.f 1:oi 1 F°.~~ ~ ~ 4/ s'\ ~ ,I i, ( U 1 ~ ?~ 'v =~` 111 '~ 1 ~ "• A "I 11'°~ ' ~~ X11 ` y ~ ` 1 ~ ~ ,q ~,_ ~ 'L~' GRO d du n er 1 Z a ~ ~ ~ .r 1p ,~e >a. 1 ` a \~r. 1~ v\ _J \. `tee 1 1 ~~~\\ \ ` , 11 ~ 1 ~1 ~~ `1. , ~ 1 ~ ~ '(~\'J \~1 ® ~\ 1~\' 1 "`~ e ~ ~ ml ~ '! ~,. \ ~ ~ ~R, F"' / ~a~.•>` m~ "~~ ~~ Fe,"~ w W,~\ ( ! /~ '. 1 i i~ 1~ \~1\ ~ LRU U ~,+5'~~ r I ~ I ~y```yx • .. ., ~~-, 1 °'~ I 1k; F,S -1 ~ F ., ~~'•.y ~ I ~ ~ ~ j'-\_L ~ ~ ~ M0 ~ 4 • ULY I~]~klL.' 1 /II\~//~ ~ I 1 i -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ \ _ e saga xaa ma~ ,~ \ Fse _ esce_ \_e r~ ._ \\ ' I \~ 1 d .. ,! ~ ~ ---,tee - - ~ ~ ,.,.- - _ -- = -- - - - - -- \\ ., ~~., ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R 5~g ® 8KF ENGINEERS F ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~,1, 1~ 1. ~~, ~ i `x--T- 1 ~ ~ f y1 ~ t i~ ~ : I / 1 i 1111 T~ ~1 ' ~ 1 1 , ,1 . I L I~b , ° ~ l ~ ~ 11 I 1 I,I 11~ 1 ~ '~ ~ r,~. 1 _ y ti ~ 1 ~ ~+`~; ' ` 1 ~ s 1 1 .~ 11T i,, 1~ y ~ ~ v. ~ 1 . I ~ ~ R, ~ e ~' GRADING NOTES Y a ~' a 01 NEW AC SURFACING AND PARKING STALL STRIPING u ~8m O NEW PARKING AND LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ~ I I Q3 EX BUIIDING BEING DEMOLISHED AND REIADDEIED rc I r l 1 ~ 1 ~. 1q,1, O NEW AC SECTIDN AND PARKING ~ ° a~~~S 11 ~i i x¢11 ~ ~ ~~ :,~ I * r 1 11 r1 ~ ~ ~-r ` ~ ~I ~ ~ ©1£GETATm BIOSWALE, 4' MADE MINIMUM M I 1 {q, q~ l~ 1, ~ 1 1 I )1111{'1 i~/ ~~ ` ~, e ` 1 ~ ~ l I, 1 , ~ ~.. I ~1. . ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~. 1 `~..Lr 1~ ©NEW fi' N1DE 9DEWIJJC V 11 1 ~I - Lr Gy~.,us ~~ ~~~' ~- ~ w .2 1 ~i11~ ~~ ~A``~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ r it ~ ~. ~ X 1 11 w y~! I , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~', 1 1 '. 11 1.1,1'lly ~ ~ > r ~~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~'~ ,11 1 ,111,.1`1 w 'ti ~1 '~ ld ~-.1 GR6P~C SCALE `,l X1111 ~4 `~. 1 ~yG x u nE~ wl~ ~ ~ 1 ~. '•~ 1 11111 Iii - -.: ~~~ ~ ~ ~r c -rre . ' ~ .- 1 ~;~1~11111 1 ~ ~ ~~ do ~` d, __ ~ ~ 1\111111 -1 1 '' w ~ '~ ~ ~' `~ ~I (Greco) ~~' 11 1pl I ,~ ~ti°~ ~ ~ ~~JOf 1 TC Y ~ ~ 1 '~ ~~--. ~ i ~ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ e ma- . a m ~: 1 J 1\ i 1 5 ~ j .. ~ ~ .' ~ § P dr ~ ~ ne ,=~aa~r, us-en. ~ Q 1 1 ,~ ~~~ ,~ A' ~ -'T -. ~~ jI CJF!.,L ~FCE~ ~ 1 1 ~, e 1 ~ 1 ~ _' ~_ :~I ! 1~ ;A 1 ~ ~_ _ ,L~ . j+- -_T ~~i' 292 ~ ~ f 1 ~ 1 O , ` \ 111 ' ~, .`~ ~: I T"~ -- .. B`V6P _ F~ey~ i- Q ~ r°. 1 .. ~ ~ ~ - __- - - 11 1~1 ~ ~~ ~-~ ~_ ' ~' _ ~ ~,y ;... .-~~. i:a~ '~-[.. 1291 ~.Cw ~ _~ 1 II ` -__ i -Y ~~~=~~ s: 1 , ~ 1 111 r~'1 1~ k 1 ,I ~ --__ c ~~ L_~.-,_ '~) .~ i ~;~• _ _ yp~., 1 1 I lx ~ l ~il'I a 1i .. ~ 'r ,r ~' __ . ~ 1 I 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 tt , 1 1 // ~.~-~' ~ 6 ~ .;~ ~;~ ~.G' 2,. ,•r j 111 u, ! - 1!m.3 iii"'( n '~ Y~ I I ~ ` +~- . ``\ . '~' ~ ~ / V/ ` a ~11 SI1N!~1111~ r Ufa.. w: _ _ it 1 ~i 1 A '•~ 1 '1 ~ ~ r-' ~ 1 .~~ ~ t„N~ ~. ~v ~iw, ~- ' _ r&yi ~ 2 H I y -.. 1 2.1 a 1 p 1 I;T :_ 5 `~ ~.. a ;G l "„~ y 1' ~ A~ Z 11 1.:1111~1P1 4 ~y3,=141 ~. p~ ) a:» .. O >.. 1 •~Iyf A ~~ V `~ ' ~" ~~1 ~ ~Y J 0 ~ 1 1 1 ;I~~idl1'~ 2 ` ~ 1 1 5~'1 I ,. ~ l~, ~d, ~ 1 I i ~ 11i 1 , ~~ n9 111 ~' 1 1, ~;. 11111u1 1 ! 1 ~ 11i ~~ r i r~ e i L ~ ~' i . ~ a' '~ d, ,, , ~ •. ;1 ~ , , 111 - ~, S 1 i -- i~:-, ~ ~ ~+A- ~) ',, ~•'r ~ 1 11,111 ~ y `~ C l Ill ~ Fri l .~ _~f1t ~ll ~ ~ 1 ' - I~ r, h PfNll F ® u~ - 1 ' 1 1 ~ ` '9-~`I. ~ I r l 1 r4 ' I 1 I `,. I 8 ~ 1 ~ ' ~i ' ~~- ' ter. A. r 1 1 ~~ P i ~'~~ J ~ I r -+ y ~, ' ~ ~ ~1 ~ 11 . ~ 1 . _ I ~ I ~',r. AlE i ~^ .. 0 _ 'PHASE 1 LI1fli°-DFv. ~i~1 1 1 i g ,-';- ~1i [11 . ~ r t 1 ~, \ a 111 1 ~g 1 ' _.__. ~~ 1 11 ~ 11 Lyl 1 1~.1 ~ e 1 1 ° ~ ~,,~ ~~ !~ ,1 1 `.-4 1, ~ 10160 C; ~ ~' 1 _ I 19 1 r 1 r a ,~ ~1 1 1,~: ~1; ill `~, 1 nl,a ,~va ~}) ' r ~ ' ~' l I r 11 c 121 ~S ~. 1 ,~ .2cea ' ~m '~~1 1 a ~ 1~ s 1 ~~ i~ yx ->a i ~ X11 111~i v 51 1 ,4' 11 7 ~ s l 4 1 , 1 ~ 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ '~ A ~' , `~ y 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 9 ~~ Y l ~ / 1 l w ~ I i I I ~ r i 2 I 1 ~ ] w ~ ~~ ~•~ , I ~ I . 1 A 1 I 1 1 ~ ' . ~_. ~° ,~ ~~ ~ ~ - 1 ' T ~.~ x ':a.? •~_'~. r ~. '~ f ~:1 J0223TC ,~ 30131 - 'm ~° . `=1. , - _ ••~•.• ~ _ -~.'~` :,-=~-:-~;FaR~-- 5TE1~~IVS~R~EK ~ _ea t. ;G ~' ~. ~- 1 1 .9O ~ Y \ ,~e9 o I~i ~1 (Q e 111 O ,'1 IY ~ I ~x ~ e~x.~ vEn ~ ~ Q U •1 ~ 's ~'.~ ~ I W ~Z ' 7 `~ y 1 '~_ i t '" V S '~ a9,e ,I e i I~ ~ L; i I 1 1 11. f ~dM9 U~UrL A I (i ~ a 11 111 ~ f hr nENLF k i I T 1 11 1 jy r l- f tT, ~ f T r ~e ~ v..c~ I 11 1 •1 ~I ry. _ O 'i Z {, ~ ~ }-~, _ ,~ 1 1 1 1 1 1~ F ~~~_ ~I `we 1 1 1 1 ~~1 ~! tt r, I 1 I w I 1 z ~_ , •. li ~ o_ I * ~ ~ ' '~`~ i ' I ~ 1 u I 11 ~ ~ 1 U 1 0 ~ I ;>' •,r1 rl ~ I ~rau~+2+, ` jmc: r, a, ~ I f° F 1 1 , F I '~, 11 I(4 ,~ , . ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~~ i i ~ ~- 11_ K I~ SI, ~ wo ,r ,l 1 1 ) y~f ~.~II I i i i ~., I ~, ,, - w I L `. r . V. ,~_ 1 .- ~ I q I I d, i I ~-r~~`F ~; 2 1 ~ 1!~ I r. y' ~; . II ~ ~ i ~- l~ BFA•F~R1~IP`b~t1N1T OF W ~. e9 I ~ ~,;~ Il ,ye ' ~ . "."~~,,, 1 I ! 11 _ _ ,",~, _ fS ' - .t., ~' 4. , ' -- ~ .e ~' PHA _. .. _ ~~ _ I ~ - s - m RwalN--~ ~ I ! 1 1 'I 2 -- ' 2~,9' i oro.I~ rNmhsr ,'~ +. ~' ~ C-6 6GF8 m akr• rur. I ~'1 `,I 111 , ~ -, _ 1 ~ 4 _ ,. + W + a 11 '1111+~ 1 r 1 ~k ,, 1 \ 1~~ +1 l , 2 _ ~~ 1 114~it \ 5 11 ~ „ 1 1 M1I'--11(1 I G ~ 1 .MU. i~ Y N m 1 1 ; PI, I ' y'y~ w y 1 1 I'pi5 1; ~ ~` 4 ~ r 1 I~_ ~~ g m ~ C r ~I';I~1 ~ I' ii ~_. zW~a IN 1111. ~ <'u" ~ \ ( ~ pg II I ~ o~~ m ~ 11~ I L~ ~ `4 r I rcw w 1 111! 1 . ~ :,' I ~+ `; r Z<mp ppp II ~ ~ 1 1111i1~}I l / `~ \ \I ~ l _..-'l 6NNYY ~, )II JJ 1 T+ Ill + j ~(iA °~ Y :~'~ -ter k ~' t ~ 1 0 ~1~1~11 ~ vif \ r , ~oi- ?-~ 1 ~ , ~. N ,, , 1 ~1 ~ :: ~. , 1 ~s3i1, 1+1~~111 ~ ~ 1~~ ~ ~t ~~~~~ 11 1 ~~ r 1 ~ 1~ 1111111 `~'~ ~q '~ \~>~. - ~11 1111{f ~~,\ Y/ ~~x ` ~ - fi '~ L f 1 ~ \ I .11 + 1 1,111'11. '. ` { T+ j111111~ ~~, \ . ~ fit; ~ ~i~~ $~~' 1, 1 1 ,111 ~ ~ ~ dr..\.''~u. r~[c ~~ CI . ^ t ~~ _ _ '1 t1,N4i1~;~~1 i ~ ..~ ~ ~ ~r `' I ---' ^5 1 ~' ~ ~ I i~~~ l me-.w a. T +i,4;la+nljl ~ `4 ,l ~.~. ~;a ~ ~I f r e°' ~ u 1 i ., .nl~ l 11 ~~ ; -. i h ~~ s~ - .,,. ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ` t ~ r >tn 1 1 ~Ilxl~~ ~, ~3LF' 1 ~ ~. In' _ Z"$' - .r t , . ~ ~ J ~ of v cn'cLr, Q 1 nai~N.l 4 ~ 7 `. \` ~.,_, ~ °T a_' i; sua o',7c [. I i ' ;-T. 1 _ IINW~ m~ - r'y. ,. X ,j i ~__ =-~„~~' 3 _..1. -'1, nx_+kr fH .~~ I~r J- ,, I K +1 ~~I~IIM al ' d'~ 1 ~ `• 1 ~'s-.-rT~_~ rur r ~`'~ 11 j I_, O 1 ~,I,a 11 , r 1 ,,i ~ y_ ~"_ _ __ ,-r"- -t __ 's7~1 ~. -~ l,_ ~' 1 •11~11~1,111° +4 r R,'_ s k ill ~ ~. . ci.rt -_._. ~~ RR" Z-__z,~~,,--'~._~~_~. ~. "}`'E~ ,~ / I U 1 I F JY' w•• 1 11 11 T 1 I ~A.''r ,.ss s,:e I.~so ~~~ " '~Ln 1`~ lol l ~ i~~l I ~ 1y ~ .~,{~~- _ 11 IIIId14dr1+ , ~~, 110' P t ~ a`~~. __-_ _; --~°.~"."'~_~ ~ .a. 1 `1111111 11 i r. ~ 0.010 : 2('A 1Q, ~`~ '.. I ~ ~ ~ ,_ 1, ~ ~ .. ~ l \~ ~~~ ~~ ~ 1 ~ li Irl~~l h' I M 1 ~'+ ~ I ~~ I I ~I ~ r 1~, 1 ~ 1 ~. 1 ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~, ~ v ~ a w ,~ 1~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ''i' 1 !' S 1 ' I ~ a ~ +`.~+ ~ , ~ "~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~' 1 ! ' ~ ; _ r ` I ,.n~. n 1 .tiW .ws f ! i r _ .-1 1 1 i ~~l 1 _ A\~ .. ., ~ 1 .. a 1 i 1 I ,j ~. 11 Illllllll+: 1x. Fr ~t'1 - ~ .y D '_.,~; ~ ; ~ 1 - "~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ -~i. ae ~'~. ,•~a,.,:, C' su l r~': .~ 1 ~ - :'~ _ r 1 ~ -~~ , 1 1111111u. 1% to '.~ - I I '~`:°1,g I ` 1 111 ~ F 11 1 a9 `., 1' 1 ~ 11 ~' 1 \\ " n- .. t~ e.n 1411 ~ dhl ryi.'1 I ~.JT - r L'-i'~~''G{ \ r :. „ ~ \ ' ' 1 + 1 -~ ~" (f_T~ 1, \ ~'~; •. \\~ ~•~ _ Q Z~ ell 1~1j1111i11 s I , .~ ~. _ •.....b .re -_ ~ ~ `I .• r\ "i' rs...,. O N ~~ , stz r I ~.. ~ ~ 11111111111, ~ ~ 1 a:r I ~ ~ (. ~`I 1 1 1 '1 ! 11 1 .. i ~~ ~~,', _ 1, ~, ~ A ~ r,T~` 1 ~`_ 1 J U 111 ,, 1 It ~l .1 li ~ ~ti'' ' 01010 ~ .~. 4 _4 ~ ll °; + .1 1 11 ~1 1- li ~ ~ ..,.1 11 1 Irl 11 I SCI 1, 1 ~~ ~ o, 1~~1 .. ~ ~: i ~ ~ W ~Q SI I. .. I liyl 'r ~ ~ I ~I~t'~, ~ I o ~ _ I-n,l 1, ~ I A ~ 1 ~ ~ `~~ 11 r 1 Il ld 1 t ~ 1 0' 0 I 44..:" ~ , 1' \ I1, 11 ~ 1..+ 1 I n 1 ", Jt I ~tiGLFE L; FJ 1 Vl[ ( F \,It11 1, l~ 1 I- (.- 4..1 ~ I'1 .' 1 .. ~ I ~ P, Tt 1~ /~ Q ;,1'1 . ~1 r + 1 ® I ~ 1 a~ ` 1 \ ;!r.~ T\ ~ 's., l li ~ H 11 , AI I~r ~ Y l'" IQ ~, ~ I ~ •xi9 ~ I , W ~ Z ~' ~,o ,~ ~ ~, .~'~~, _ ~ l 1 a 4 41 1 A V- 5o 5~0.0f0 ~,,.. ' I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ la ~ ~1 ,1 ; , v ~Lf' `, ,;,+., ` '~. 1 71Ft0'PYC I_v, i. ~•~.. ~ \~ ~d~ e ;~,i~ ~ r- y ~ I e ~; ~ ,d~ ~ °~ ~e r4~11 i ''`-,1 ~11 al ~ _t~1~A~ ~~ SR^. ~ ,, ~, ,.~_•I ~~ ~1 1~ ~ ~1 ~~IIV 1 i ~, ~ .~ 1 , I ..._ PHASE 1 {IMI748G- l ~ i ~ 11 1:. I, + 1 S, %~t ul I t i ~ l) :~w 6^ ~. ~+r,x' r~n~[u r.- I ~ ,.x ~ ~ + 1 ;1 ~ ~1 r w.l` 1 ~~~y ~~ E~ I~ 1 I C u; fixEES ~~, a° 11 t +, ~,1 1 p1 1K 1 I. I ~ ~ "'L1 ~ I .;'~ ~' ~•~1r-= ~ 16.x" t 1 ~ '~ 1~ 1 4 i~ 111 ~ ~ 1' ~ `~~?J. I •.. 1. I ,, , r y K , ,~ ~ r , . ~ r . ~ :.r; , A r~,, , V N ; ; . ! 1 [ ,[s~ 1 `j, 11 A Ili ~`~ Z I 11 1 °111 uai~; t, i ',+i=" nzlr to• PVC I ~ ,~ r1~--1 _,'ll Xr.l 5, `1,-r ur.m' e +' I so s-o.mo -- _ I ~ ~' + N r f% 1 1 v h ~ ~ ' 1 ~ ~n ~ 6a ~~ a ~ 1 11 ~11~~ 11 ~ (~ 1 ~ _. ~" 1 '1 u~ }1 ~'r• i~~ 1 ~yl ;~ ~ ~ ~~~ _ 4 ~i ~~,~ ~TII~I - a d fi 'o ' P I I r ' ~I 1~ -F'~'`j~»E `.."' o ~ ~ 1 I, ~ ~ ~ ~ I, ~ l U D; 4 t 4 1 1 1 4' 11 Y .t-, ~ T ., IN~1 11 ~ 1 ~~ , '` ~ ~ - ~~ •, ~ - S ~: a ~t • =, I, ' I' ~ ~ ~°j'~~~~q ~~:~ Hr 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~-cr" ~,y,~ ~ ~ r ." r 1 R f 'll , 'o' ~ ,~ ~ I I v J ~-1~, III ~ 11 ~~ 1 ~1 1-cr-E% W~ ~ r N ; ; 1 1 ~'1- I 9 "' l 1 ~ r tT J ~~ ;' ~1CJ ~I 1 ~'~~11r 1 r '~ ~r- ~ ~., .r 11 •I' ~CP- ! 1 I I ~ I.~ 1 it ~>l +' to P ~~ -- ~ ~~ , ~~ ~~ a. 't ~' ~a '" ~ ~ Y+ , ~~ ~ ~ ~ /, . ~ i ~ ( .~ r 1 1 1 I _.5~+5`U.010 ~T~ ~` ~ ~" ~I~ 'P`~^ I. ~ N.. I I ~ i I; 1~ ~~ k ~ 1 S 10 P - 1 ~ 1 ~~ ~ b ~" 1 ~~ff. ~ 1 _ 1 1 I r ..~°df' , 1 p~ ~ ! ,1 aw ~~ 1 ~ 111 SDI 0 1 ~~ 1 '-~ 4 1 ~ I_~ I `~, i ~ ~ - 1 4 '- 6 wry ^ . j ~ F'F'.i I I .` [ _ ~- U~tl'L k. f 1 ~ I 1 I ~1 /'\T ~' II~:1 ~'~1Is-' ~1 1 1 r . ' I y,o,T ~- .~ ~ I f tl I I„ ~~ ! ~~ I ~ II ~ Y I I v "~' ~ ~ ' ~ I •; BFT ul~l~$ O'LiMIT bF ,. IF,b 06QG + - ~ ,~~ .z .. y - _ I ; -. ; I ~ I i ~ 1 i I Ir,A i I~ ' I i 1 ~p^9'° ~ ~ .~Wr' ~~' ~ ~ ~ (~ 1, _,,.~ ~ _v~-~ vry, ,, , - JIIr- ~ -•---.'--,- - ~._ _ L Uc 'St 1Mtt 7 ~~ 1 ., T. - ~~ f I I ~ ~'" --~-__ r ter, i ~~~j d _ _~-_` •,~41 . (r ~`I II ~~ 'r.. j -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- ~i ~~ -_ r-1--r ~ "3~~"~= k-'- r-_1-',~ ~~r`-~-1-.~r{-f~~ .-.==' ~'~_` -*-.__-.-.., i. ~ - - -_ c.~ -u~ \ I 1 3 ~ ~ r~ ~ i • ~ .,,, T _ .... ,. ._, . - :9>s ~ f-;' C-T ~~ :-~ i~ 7~g ®BKF ENGINEERS rux BECTIOX u.. STANDARD 24n FLAT GRATE DROP INLET CRY Op COPSNTIrw'j~~o a: ~. w~ ~~ "~ ARr~ ~ '^m~ • r~ a m• ~w 1-~?" - ~ secrla IFirYI' wr_''-71_ 'I cuR. uma .., . srrna rA w.n. r. . xorE~ Rrxn xm.+an n+r _ eae AIM xN emraN of Nx tMY Enpnex. e - •'-~ ~ I r D C I A r f a ocl II A ~ e O_O_ II ~` L I 00 li ~ A~ r I a D ~ ~ Bona r.r _°e~ Il ~I '- I ~ . ~------- • e,• ~~ ~IK 3 r `~iL~~' C anwR e.N nenwme rxona aNTt aTUL • _STANCARD DROP INLET -CURB OPENI~N/G~~ ~,,,, CITr OP CU-EIITINO on .~1.°L T 2 S1 NDARD D6TAllS c r R .tbNCENTRIC MANHOLE rue-~i• mi x.r er aw a aa.. ^ rmx. r4 wN w. aRSIRaIMRa YWN mmlela MN M pd ctrr of euPellnNO A,~e,xea E 5 i n' Hf , ~ E Y or .onoble PAVetA nnttte ~ R•1/Y ~ Ail/7• " ~ yl- , Y . ~ t pp °•AD A "~ L •~ l~ . ~ a 'a' Clasr II A95. Eofe Ali I AYi ~~...I I...1~ F Ifs 2f ~ '~ I ~ ~~. R:'~' N~Vp B Y or rarwde e la• ,.. l ~ . ~ : R,N,n~ o; 1 ~ . A.T ~ .. ~ O o ac °YoD A t4 Ali K• C,wr n AqS. ewe Ati LDD' 1Y sa R.0.08 RaR~e /V ` O.l' R.t7 .'L,,~r T IY A.I~r/ ~ R.,,~ • of T TYPE E @IOUNYABLE DUU21 ~~ {' Gnss II Aqg. ewe TYPE E I. ~I ' T ~ R..Yt 1i; e 6 A.i/C 1ia• ~ 1 L T ,'I T 7z. r,"~vmn I]I meAN',N ev ru°.~.nen I/! ee.x• mWmun r hngln, r Rmp A.C. DIKE E1(tfIUDEDCURB AIiR Amp Ali CI IY OF giPEAiINO I APPPON]? STANDARD DETALS n.w.,..,m.~d rr.w.,~rs..e mms m,„r„v.R»~n .N..Mu ~.~ «~. n PLANVAAY r.enna,~~rR~. ecwnxwwos« '' a.____ r :r....n.,~rnfs __ __ xm.,,w. aRax.r,mvxaex ~ u . .~.w,.~,w~,..on,nr,,.el~rerw. ~ Re,. ,o~wprw.uuRe~Rr.w,arr,n ~ _ I~ rrviprx. ~saurnxn ~- --; ' F ~____F A 4]-A u'nr..u.wnAa "~AV~Mi RIOInKn. I I i O `.----~ ~ ~`--J a lSTxx1E NEW EIEYATXIN YSAY ASNSMIEDNSW sarw a.rr. '°N rM°"" rypd TMk°'R'R "P'bn" emm.Rnrp, TYPICAL OETNL WITH S¢NG TABLE ,mm.m eNem. unl. x.R.r. wren wr.wr., x.r o~aaol x. ex ywWn„ rnn a.w enmwn 01°"~ STORMVJATEfl TREATMENT SYSTEM r c IwAw~ VORTSEElTRY°HS usrrmn a ~ ~ n lan , m vA xD nm an am Io rm ao am ,a a em xm a ao sm Iwa rs>s aee an so ea em an ±a a aA 570~~j-~ xw a sm aro a., as au em xm Irx sA en Ir u lao FOR NFORMIITIONAL AURPDNN ONLY•MOTNRENDSO EORfANSTRLICTlOx ,.aae..r,~ 1-16 rRE¢'a' aw.~eN wY. owN, eNp, r.iar r xnNn le' sY et am Ay ,nR by yn,ygy m' mY ]!' ~ >r -»~ heubm mh N' Mx 9.flr1M ms Y' 11' r REaExm rwE .loxr oR a!r / \ '~a~ ~. Axr l/r eoE r oDP ax p at , * \ ~or1i \~ cn,RNe sR+RRre w mnerwr e fimeNd w NRn NdwdR net eaNnNd E ny~pglb~X rq ob N mwYe NAa rmrr m~k 3 (gmyW,ym N Co/m Bmn ldeR e' n~ Y b WRra ~"etl eFS~ riw Mw- a 1 mmMgnP/IY Mr be R mYmRn N y 5 Poaanl m b FYMtl ~ Nm YA N ~• ~ e' ae~i . ! ^~ a ~MAdp 'a , 9M MNNM ~ee~a~ ptl.'T,DrI A•A DRNEWAY DETAIL -MONOLITHIC SIDEWALK PFNiD AIY TmI a cuPERnxD DA ~ I-~+ NOAAO DETAILS _ ~ OTf ENGIN ~ ~ ~ >< n .~. a o. ~8S Og~rn g~ ~~ a~~~~ ~~ m ^~ ~:~ Q Z U N yy F ONyZ O ZW<Q H=O~ Wa i a N u s ~ ~ 4' MINIMUM L sn F _ ORA55/lllR ~~ W ~~ a U 6' PERFORATED PIPE SWALE BACNF6E MATEAIN. 10 MEET DRNNAGE NTENSITY AS MIRAFl M140 n SPECIFlED BY GEOIECHNICAL FABRIC i_ ENpNEER = BACKFlLL MATERIAL AS APPRDYFD BY GEOTECNNICN. ENGINEER e: DRANACE PPE VEG~TATID 3WALE 3 1 ' NOT TO SCALE ~ x ~ S C-8 8 DF tR avr cnirinircor ABBREVATIONS 6 LEGEND PROPERTY LINE - - LOTUNE ------- CONTOUR LINE ~-~ STORM DRAIN MAIN - - w~ 1RL°1 - - SANITARY SEWER MAIN - Jn_ss cvcr~ - WATER MAIN e•r (+~)- JOINT TRENCH Luc GAS LINE - 6•G f.ssL WATER VALVE D4 FlRE HYDRANT SIGN ELECTROUER # GAS VALVE ~ FENCE LINE -x- ASPHALTIC CONCRETE AC AREA DRAIN AD BUILDING CORNER BLDG COR CATCH BASIN CB CONCRETE C/GONG CHAIN UNK FENCE CLF ELECTRIC E/ELEC EDGE OF PAVEMENT EP FOUND FNp GAS G HANDICAP RAMP HCR HIGH POINT Hp INVERT INV LIP OF GUTTER LG MANHOLE MH POWER POLE pp PUBLIC SERNCE,URLITY EASEMENT P.S.U.E. RIM R STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN SDCg STORM DRAIN DROP INLET Sppl STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SDMH SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT SSCO SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SSMH TOP OF G1RB/FACE OF CURB TC/FC WATER VALVE WV PURPOSE PROJECT - TO CREATE 2 PAR~LS -ONE PARCEL TO BE FURTHER SUBDIVDED INTO 4 CONDOMINIUM UNITS. yv~ fi iu ~ ~ ~~ CUPERTINO OAKS TENTATIVE MAP CITY OF CUPERTINO, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NOTES ~ r~,,,~.d` ~,' z n~ ,' i' :,: ~ ,?'+a ~C~4; .: rmnr ~ ~ g. ~--r~a+wrra Ntia.c~ ~ ~-, A 'x12 _... #q4~ ,, iS 4 ~ 4 ~,„y ~_ ' w ~' } 4~ k_. r ' ~ ~ o _. d i4~ 4nlatltr ., z.pelMMA"~ p '~ e ,„ i~e ,~~ ~ .urt~auu ~11M1~C ~ww s wr~w~lr'I OliLlh rwtlmwy Y ^.7 k ny,~~,:'~' kWr '~a_ AA is ~ ~,. I _ ' v i °', i - a t E$ !~ n, ~ n {a wAwir i ~~ t ~ r~s p lMw+~~.« a.fi ~ { ~, ~ >. r CGd?' C ~ 1 r ~~,.,,, r ~ a° swsa- ~ P . i. _p~y,, ` ; ~ _ v ~ tip. ~,~„~. ~ ..--,. ......, i~~ry. .: ~ :tiwwr+w: VICINITY MAP N.T.S. 1. ASSESSORS PARC0. NO.: 326-27-035 2. SUBDINSION NUMBER: PM296-M-41 3. EXISTING LAND USE: COMMERCIAL 4. PROPOSED LAND USE: GENERAL COMMERCAL 5. EXISIING ZONING: CG-GENERAL COMMERCAL 6. WATER: GTY OF CUPERRNO 7. SANITARY SEWER: CIN OF CUPERTINO 8. STORM DRAIN: GTY OF CUPERTINO 9. GAS & ELECTRIC: PAGFlC GAS AND ELECTRIC 10. TELEPHONE: ATdcT 11. CABLE TV: 12 STREET TREES: INSTALLED PER CITY STANDARDS 13. EXISTING WELLS ON-SITE: NONE 14. SIREET LIGH1S: INSTALLED PER CITY STANDARDS 15. SOUND WALLS AND MASONARY WALLS; ADJACENT TO FREEWAY 18. FLOOD ZONE: ZONE B 17. DATUM: FOUND BRASS DISC STAMPED 'BM 180 RESET 2001', TOP OF CURB SOUTHERLY SIDE STEVENS CREEK BLVD, 203 WESTERLY OF RAILROAD TRACKS (BETWEEN IMPERIAL AND BUBB). ff o ~ n 8 ~S& ~~~~ ~~~~~ m~ ^~ ~:~ Z rr O U Ya a O~w° O ; =Q Z-yN F-aWo aZ~~ F O O Z F w a U GENERAL NOTES 1. OWNER: MADENA INVESTMENT, LP AND SUNNYVALE HDLD usso oAK sTREET SARATOGA, CA 95070 2. SUBDIVIDER: SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY ATTN: PETER PAU 489 S. 0. CAMINO REAL SAN MATED, CA 94402 (65D) 344-1500 3. MAP PREPARED BY: MARTIN B. PARISSENTI, P.E R.C.E. 30747 BKF ENgNEERS CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1650 TECHNOLOGY DR., SUITE 650 SAN JOSE, CA 95110 (408) 467-910D LEGAL DESCRIPTION TOTAL PARCEL• B.10 ACRES PARCEL 1: 2.60 ACRES PARCEL 2: 5.SD ACRES TABLE OF CONTENTS S~EEI DESCRIPTION TM-1 TITLE SHEET $ TM-2 MAP SHEET TM-3 PR0.IMINARY GRADING AND DRAINAG P AN ~ ~ ~ ss R E L p y ! TM-4 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN ~ ~ ~ P TM-1 Imo/ ®BKF ENGINEERS l ail ,: v ` ~ ` y ~d ,~' / I h ~'~, ~ ~ ~ ~BS' ~ v G 1 0 i ,,. ~ }~„ '~ ~ } .2M ~ ~ l ~ ~ga I it 1` 11~ y~,41 r 1 ~ t \ \ ~ ., ~ 1 l \ r '` L. ~ ~ n r ~ `I, ~ I;,,tl F;., ~ti! '~~ \. ~. ~. ` I : ~ NOTES: ~ ~~: 1 ''1 111 ~,~1 `I ~I,11~ y~\ r ~ ~w. , ~ rr ~V y r,J ~~ ~ BUIIDINC TO BE REM0I~ED c m ~ rec1 ~, n i;11Vli l y ~''~~'\ e ~ ~ . ~• ~ 11 ~l, K TREE TO BE REM04ED ! , ~~1'~~d~i11~1 F ~( i ~~~ ~,~~ ~- ~ 1 1: e^ 1~~~1,I 7Y' , 11 1 ` IJ 11~}11'IrE~~ ~,i rl, n ~ .x\~ \L ~ ~ r ~ ~ 7 YI 1~ ~T , 1 r T ~ f '` r 1 1" r,~, 1 i 11;1 d1 ~ ~ I ~~", o. ~ ~ 1 1.- ~11111111 n~ ~ -~' ~wc reYgku Er ~~ x1111 ~44^^SS~ ~)~ ~ ~~'4 J, 1 a1~11~1`I1,14 @~va~ k~ 'l ~ ~~: ~ti\~\F~Y \\ \ \ ,r l'~~' IYFf. ~ (~ .._ 11 , ,r 11},, ~tll~ '~~ ~~ ~~ ~ '~ ~ ~'~ f~. I I. ;~ -G! GRAP~C SCALE .. III 11i1,~,l1~~ ~ i A;~` \. t ~ 1+ -'L-r I _,L~'"~~ } ~`. I '~ uP,l~ll~p~ 1 ~ r;,. •,,,, ~ ~. / +w ,~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~' zxe ( ~ '~ ~ zrzz ~ I~ anuw. aesnwEn N. 1 e eer) ~~' i11r1111 , ~, a ~ ;a. / -~. dPl - - z~ - ~ i ,aE~xt uE.c a[ r ~ ~z i I 3r•e _ ' , ~ < ~ 1 1 t rc-r 1 ~ l l r_ I - 1..1 l l 1 xx ~ ` 1 x ne 1 N!ry~p ~ ~1 ~' 9f;^ .t. ~ .";„ ~ I i r ~ ~\ I - '_ ..... I _ _. `~_ .. ~^Ey-~ r1 i 1 11, n'jr~. r r Lz 3.i r , d I "I .c r, ._~;,, -.'',--~ ~x~__. -~-- i4 _ r w. vv \r , Q 1 t,tl~13p~M111 k l1~ ` wn} . 1 I i / ~ `,`,e~ I j j ? ._ ~_ ...- ~-` _, _ ,~ .F; v C ~1 Z 1 1~9Rn iF ^1*` ! "Z~.A 't. 'k` ~.I 1 ~ ~ '- xn _, '.f_. zvs~ I 0= 1 1 In1,n11AC15~ r~ .r~, 4 'r^a a ' V aur+ ' s r ~1 ~ ~ / - _. `~ -.... L.: i O I r IiPI PI~,I~~~ 1 t .i,a I •'„.,d6 ~. I" I ,_ I as -I.- `, G „ ~ ~ 1 4 I,~tl1111,~1 ,, % J. ~ 3 ~\ I , ~ m I 4~~~i '- .. -<-' -_ as=. - _ z '' Q 9 ~.~1,yIyIVI~~,il'~" ~1 r'~ r: ~ J, ~ t~~, ~ N} i t = "s.~ . ~"~ 1 I y "" ~/ -„ _ . "-'`_ ~~y r Ly~_~ r U 1 11 1 1 111~'r~~lln ~ z ~ ~ ~1 ~`~ !`-~1 i. - 11e l.~ r ~ _. ~ I ~ } !- I I ~1 ! r ~ " M ~ 1'1 ~V~. f~ 1 ~ t 1 ~ ~ _ __ J!,: --. n" ~i 1 , ,,t , ~ '' LL~9Ya 65~I~~VI _ '`:~ ~ I mom. 1 ~i~lel~l~~l.`~1~ 1 a- ~`"~J^'1 t~ I AJ ~-, 1 , , , j 1 'z 1 ~p " y m , 11 i Il~,h~~l 1, ~r~-s a<rs Ir ..L'" ~ ~-~"~ n} II,: `rs' v`~ :~z ~-: ~.I r ~. .z9,, Y1,55 ..i :,,~n~r.mr4-c_, _r ~ _,,Y, f~, ;1,~M>ti 1 1 ,11 ~ x.. \ 1 I ~~.i Y 1 4 . '~RL.w I. .~- .. [M ~ , 111, 111 1 > ~.. ~. ~''. ~~ 1rAF4 1 ~r. J ~ \ ~ ~;~„. - ~ h"~ ~< k~ _; ~ / ~--~ ~ r 111j1j ,, j_s / 1 1"~ ^ " r ~yw - _ ~~ ~. o-wse~R¢s~ '.i 11 11 , 1 , ~ ', ~.,.„ r 1 , ~1 111 ix, ~ A r?' `f ;~ ~ .RY' ~.~ t,~ ~ ,x F ~ 1 ~ r ~ ~ ~ 1 r 1 ~'i~~_0, 1 \ S~y.. , C.T~ i r rk~ ;l ~ ~' ~ ~, ~~ 9i~, , w le 1 t 1~1, 1~1111~ ,~ ~~,~_1 ; ~,~,,.~ ; ! ^ x~~'1'.. ~~,.-'- ~ '~~~ ~,~~f~ `•T_';,„ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ i _ _ r. _ ;,. ,, ~n,,~ ,, ,I~, _ ;, 1 11`11 ~ i a1-, ~ }111111 1 B~ r ~ t~ ~• ~ k ..~ 1 `'. ~ . ; ~ -~~ .,~ I1~ L ~ ) ` (+ \~ 1 1 'rW4 ' 1. r1 F ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ '. 11 1 ~zl '( Tai ~I ~U `+~ °: I ~ Q Q 11 S I11ir 11 ~'B , p 1 ~ I i ''y, l i, .1 ~ 1 7 ~ 1 ~"~ 1 r f,r~ k '', t 1 ~_ ~ S w 1111111{ L~ ~ %' r""~~i r 4 1.' ,` ~. \, t ~ ! 1 1 1 1 S ~ , rt ~ ~'~ 57 I "~. 1 y i ~ J y M , , ., q~IF I~I~r' 1 i ~ `. '- - ~- I ,I ~ a- ~-rl' r W ~ 1 ~, i ~~~\\\1 F$ j Ly k I k -} Q } (~ ~ kurF4 C CJ~Cf F~ 1 ~ ~ ,~ r W ~1~, i. ~~ ql' 1~~~~~ ~i i ,~1 ~. f~ARCFLII ~. t ~~ }. -- .. _. - ___ ._ ~i ,e E .,2, 2~ II ~ ~ ~ Na dd 1 ~ sl ~ 1(:,' ; 1 11~, ~ Lry .n.,,~n ~~~R~~~;a~ ;~ ~1~~ rl,.} H .~, ~ ~ n~1~ H,.y~~~~~ 1 ~ N 't v 1 ~~ 3-' ~~:6Q ~- t ) fio.oo' I ~ `° l~" ~'~ ~ r ,„~',i} I ~ ~ Q ~o mn~ ,` '~d ~. Y. ~, I s. 1 1 ~ i k- W r • } } ~~ !. 1`, P 1..._._ r,-Y~ , ro II .~E - - - 2. 't ~.,. -' ~, .w~ 7il 1 ~ ,, I ~ d~~ } F " ~ F ~ 1 1 Nr s tY il, ,~ ~1 +~"~ ~~1 ~rl^: '~ ~l'q ~ ~I~--r-_-~ 18270 ~__II ~_ t L_~ISLF"~! ~4., As '~ s'u'm n, ue ~~c1_ '~-. F ~, .. ~'z -1Y~ ~I', 1 ~ 1''~ 1 I ~ l ~ II X11 _I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ i i '~.y..... l ~ 1 a ~ x_fieE ~ r 1 \ i , ~ 111, ~ 3`"I ~ ~ r,~~/1~ ki :.... __ .. _ I~_~ _ r - 1- ~_ ,r ~ r .c~1 '~.~ aw cr, .alert e ~~.. sr 1~~ ICY IF , jell ~~~\~ w ~ .. ~. 1 i 1 y1 a . I ~ _. .- _ ~ ~ , rv~,. ~1. ~' ,, ~ u ~uerJ , f,.l 1 ! ~ ' ~''~~ 1 V 11 I1 I ~ y.& /"` ~. _ 10.00 4 ~°°_ ~' ~ -~ ID.R7AL.! l' ~ ~ ~~.- I ~ 11 r 'H I ~ - ~~., I `. I 1'~N :E. f_ I , V 1 i 111 pp } i ~, ~ ,o, ~/ ., ~1 ~I ~ L 1; 14„ ~ ~ 1 I~ .ae ; 1 -4 ,, tN~ , ~ I h ~ EVELOP6D . r"" .,,,~ 1~ '',i I X~ ~Ir ASC ~`~ ~ ~ Ir~;~ ~i 1 ~ - f Ir ~ 1 ~ -I v. (1~ I o: I 1 ~ ~(~. 1, u~ ~. 6) ' ~ ~ -- -- _... -,_ ,. ~ ' .;v W ti . '~ ~ ? 1 ~yi ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~''"~' I II , ~ ~I I iU F 1~' }J. r 1~l p d, _ 1 ,Tr3, 1 ~ ~ { ;.r?~ v ( 1 ,vv~m'I ~nEL et WO_ ~~ ,1 1 11, Y ~ I !1 ; 11 l~ 1 ~ ' ~ ~ I T /., ~. .--__ -- .- I •~ ~ r I ~ ~ F I ~ ~ I ~ '~. ,( V 4 . ~ II I ~'~ "f . ' 1 ~ II I I ~ ~ ! ~ 1gi ~~ ` ., 1) ~,.,, Ip~ I ~ ~~ m~ I .tea~`y I I ~ r~,F-E- f L ~ t i } V "~µ ~ ~ p e r ~ .ere; l l n ~ j in,o ~ I I I ~ ! I ~'` 1 11 111 ~ ...~~1 ~ 1 f ~ i o r~zsr• .,.,, r \ \. l i s i i ' T ~, .AI, 41 ',il Ij_. ,~N s 1 1 ~.'"~+~r .,~~ z "1.-~-~ VI ///~~ :.,. ,~ ~ s - `,,~ ~`l I it w. ( I i' j' I I ~; ' 1 1 X11 1, I ~ -r ... } ~'. ~~,~~~u. I k ~ ~ ~ m.U r5.. ~ ,~ ~ ~ I 4 _ I ~ I' r"~ I~ I ~s' ~~~ r a~ 1~ ; I F 1 \ ~P } r 1e ~ 1 `,~~ ,r ti T -+-, ( e=s t} I r ~ i ! L_ ~_~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I 1~^,~~~1~:r°' ,~=,,.- ter I ~. 1 , t~~ sv'~~-..,- ~„~.~~~. ~ 1 ~ ` r' ice- I I II ~ lip ~ V y taw 1~~ ~ 1y, ~~-v' ~ !y`1Y, ~V /~ \ 1 1 '~ ~h ~,V I ti ~~. ''.I ~.:.M '' ~' \ `~~~.7 y, ~ ~ x ~ ifar ~ ~I'!c ~`~` ~,.-~~~ay - ,. _ ~_•~y~« It ,}~ 1l I'1 ,1{ ' I, ~ i 1 (,~ el 1., v 1 ~' ;,T,e_ Y .w ~~~ __~, I ~ ~ I d J'1 t~ $ exCa~~ r '!~ ~~~~ ~ '~ "_- ~°'"--~- ~ _ ~.^ _ ski is r I, I 1 i It I V ~ ~9~ ca,. a[ ~1 ~r •~',t-'s-~'s_._Y^,i/. ; 1 I , I I.`, 1 I i • ~ r a ,~, ~ ; I 11 ~ ~~ „.~_~~ ut,.Er~ yr E~. i ' 1 1 Y ,_ _. r 1 r I I I; i ; a~-L-=. r "/ ~ r ~ ~ ~ 1.. I I i ,, *.. ~.,m, ~T Y-;x r I r! I~t ~ i ~ i ~ I 1 1 11; li I! ;ri ~ I ,~~~ ; r ~ I ~~ ~. _ '~~~ ~ ~•! fi i I/ t~ r I ~ ~ i l i t I ~ r.~ ; Y r4v u- ` s / ~:I ~ ~ ~ r '.•- I ~ - ~ ~ l^i'~. CC 1. r r 1 ~ 1~ - oEx E IEEE [ ' / I 11 ~~'' r ~l _ _ '`--~ von ~. ~~-~4~.-, I-r~. ~x- _,~~~-i .---•is ~ } _~ } - z _ .. L 'Y ,6y I I I '`"- ~.r=±:.;;r ~'' ~c....._'_ ~ ~'~ --c ~4--~`~` t---- --~1'~i-:4 ~~..5yY1P r "~ -N ~^ /.,~-""~ '' ~' 'l~, _v ~~_ j -~ -i- `fie _ _ `_ _ wiv. `';' _ ae ~L -~ _- _ ~ `~ r'9 L _~- = c ` E~ ~. , wci - • - _ _ ., epte _27]1 • 2%S _ ~ , \ r ~ ~ ` ~' ~ ~ -?- ' 1 ~ Ii; ~ ) ~-III f!`(~ ^~ y ~f -~ ff~.f _~ 11. - i.1` ~-?-~ '3-. ~,~\" ~-.~x `, y- -_, ~ w j ~ 1 ~ _~ 1 • i ~ ` - ~- - 1 STEVENS CREEK BLVD ora.inq Numbs TM-2 2~4 ®BKf ENGINEERS --_ I , 1, 11 EE~ , " I~ ' ~11 4 ~Ir'(r rr ~ {-ice`' f, r3.; 1 1111 iT'` ~~ ~''il ~ '~ I ~! II r 1 ~rl ~ ~~ I k' 11r 1 1 l `m fi,~ I,J1 ~rl~ ~~1rr~ I~r d. ~ YI r 1 ~ r i¢I~rl ~l I'ri r \. 1' ~• 1~ ~' 1 1 r r'~I 4 ~ , I,I li1 fa \ / ~ \~ 1 r I; /* I1 t ~~~~jr1 ~ / ,., ~ Il IIV d =.. 'r'14~rtll ~' ~ - b ~; ~-~~ „~ ~'~~~ I t 1 ,~ tl { 1 ~'' , ~ ~,y~' I ri 1'~r'` 1`U1i t '3oae `G•~°~ 111 I \ r n~ ~ d A ''al~li rl . ' -7 ` ~.`ti . ~ ~ ~~. II ~ ~ `~~ . ~ ~ ;: ~ ~d a ip. I ~. ' ~ , ~ ~. I !Ir ~ rlirllt >r i ~ rl 1 II. iipll ~ \~ .c? , o~.ulxn psi '',r ~y tt 1'~ r Id 1 1 ,: , ~~-~ S rr~~e 11 ~~ K_ ,'L ~ ~701:4#TC 1 r~'"~~~t~ '; /.~ ~E,.• ~~ , rl~l l ', b \ ~1 1 .' ~ ~i1di~Nprl 1 ~ Ry ~ ( ~ yyJ; Z~ I 1 ,r 11G~4~ ~.,~ ~ ~~ y 4yt ~ y' I r Q 1~,,. I ~ 1r ~~I~Il~hl ~ 1 ~. ~ ~ yllll~g 1 1 ~ X ', , 1 'rl~lllk ~ r ,', ~ li ~ 1 ,11,ffA 1 ~ n _ ' ~ ~ rll II;MV r~{ r ' ~I^ , 1 Y V r rPhl r" r ' r l a;E 411 q. T r r~ F ~~ ~ ' 1 1la ~i I Ir'. t ~ ! rT' F i ''; rr0 a ` rllrrll 4'''ir,~4 ~~. I J 4' 1k. 11111' ~ I ~ ~ *. 4 ~ Y ~ ~ y1r t~1~ i ~ ~ V' ~~\~ t ~ r ;I'. Il~rl I1~1 ~~ 1~~~ r ~I 1 v Poi 11 1~ - '~ ~ '' i 'll'' , 1 , 1 1 1 1 rR 11 1 RI , rl ; r t 1111 1 - Ir ( ~ Ean'4~- I 1 I arl „,~I~rlr~,~~ r~ "f'~; I 'kra r ,r rl 1 ~~' 9 r ~ ~' o tr ~~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~1 11 ~~ ~~I ~~ ~ 1 ~~ ~~ ~~ \~ ~ ~II~ I ~, ~ t ~ h ~ 4's , , '~\I I `~~ ° rr'~ ~ I ~ ~''3 r r I r l~F ~ `,max I ~: r tim ~ 'r ~~ ~~ rl ~ ~ ~-~ r - rr _ ! : ~ , . I '`Ilr ~ ~ ~ ~ > } i ` ' ' 1 ryp I 1 '~1 ~ I; ~ 'Il I+ ' f ^ H5 I~' ~ r ~1 f"'t ~ -' I • 1 ~ t ~ y` ~ 1 r~ ~ .1 ~ ~ . ~ ~.~ I ~-~'Y' r I I I l ,' ~ l ~~E~~ 4~ ~'~~Ir~~ "! ,1 ~"'~ ~I~ Ir ' r ` r ~ r ~,', I ~~ 1,, l'I r, ' 4 ~ 1 i ra_ 1 .~lvfrlT ~ { r ' ll 1;'r 11 , • ; ~+ ~ ', ~ ~ • 1~1 ,d~~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ .~ _ A `v 1 ./ ~ I. 1 ~ h ~ ~ ~~ ~y ,. _ , I J ~ \ ` ~- x ' ~ ._._.. , 4 .mac-- -~- i '\ i . ~, -• ^ y ; ~m•. 1 ~ r` F ~ U V i ~ `s ~I F It ! . $ o GRADING N01E5: > $ m QI NEW AC SURFAdNG AND PAflKING STALL STRIPING $°1 Q2 NEW PARKING AND LANDSCAPE ISLANDS = ~mw ~~~mg 30 E% BNIDING BEING DEMd.ISNEO AND REMDDELED ~ ~ I O NEW AC SEC710N AND PARKING ~~~$+~ O VEGETATED BIOSWAIE, 4' WIDE MINIMUM f ' ©NEW 5' WDE SIDEWALK u 1 ~= ~~~--~., ~ a ~ y GRAPffiC SCALE o }b` I1 ~' ~~ (Q eer l ~^ ~'" ' ~ ~ ~ sV ~' imEe.w a ate-' r ...- --,-- I '~,` f Fw .~ M ~ _~i i l .0.'i .iS:1&. ~~ TI'•. .a ~-s~-~T ~ rv s ~~r ~ 1 ~ !! I ~ 9 ; J ''-/ .Ea. ~,.; ~ ~ `~ ~1 __.___. nTJ.,. IF! F'ily __ ~ NY ~_ ~ w.TF E I y ,i __~.\ ~ ~,_. ~ Z Q , - ~ ....... .. y ~' C o `~ gg~~ :a ~~ _; ~~~:- ~tllf~•Y AWE ,, ;- a" e 11 I 'r r I ~ ~~ ~ ~, Ir Y ~~ I w - 'k ,I ~.. ~\.~ 9~, ,w..2s.a err m ~ ~ i i ~ l ~ ~ 1 ~ ~.1 1 P .;rte ,h '_ 'a, r~j~\~'~-, , ~ n L~E~aEairo as ~ Q ~ Q Jr C ~ ~ ~ Y r,. ~ 1 } r 1 sT ,r ~ ~ 1~ , . ~ - I LH ~, ~ r41 W o ~ , ' ''r. ~ ~~ r PFD 1 ~ _Z ~ (7~^ Ir ~ r `~ ,. h x ~reE~; L Z LL 1 -' sas I p r Q O 3E11 I Q ~ ~ ~~ ~ t 1,~' z~1 ~~ER I ~ W Z ~~ ® n i I , x~~ ~ ~; I,' d Z ' r ~, ~ ~ I ~ ~ ,1• ~ ~ ~ . ' ~iy~ 1 ,1 r ~: .. ~ .~" .t^~~. ~ ~i tM' r' C5 nreFr, ~py.yIr ~ r ~ r I 1. ~• ..~, 1 '"'p.~1.4. ~ uF i rt,. 1. '' ~. ~I -, '~ ,(' \~.1 I'~ ~ 11p ri 1 ~r ~., ), ,!? ~. r! r ~ y rib n r F,. 1'rL ,..,I ~ rrl Il~ A W II46 ~~ ~ "r ct ~ I k~r ~A ~E E~ CC' 1 ~~~)' I I Illy ~ ~~~ ~O n/ :.`~ ~ ~ t"u t, a~ II I Ij 1 Ir II ~ II`, d~ 1r ~ / M.v~ 1. ~ I iHe. o• ~ r ,.~ `r ~E n s, ,v ~ ~ m ~cll I nn x U ~(V'W I ~ ' 777 1 ~~ t 1 ~ 1,E ' ir41 11 r ~I II ; r r i Uj .. a, y"'u~,! .~ !I I1 ~I r ~~• Y t ,' III I I t i E' f vr' k ~ 11 1 .. ~ ~ ~ ~a'~ a t'. .~ Y \ ,' T~ ~ r ! ~ I' ~F~ I4`` I _ r r r~y ! ~`-.. r r ~ f _ ~ ~ ~ f31~r ~ aA~`SI " V r:j~ Oo' ~ '. I •L I ('A ~ r ~ J 1 I ~ ..vaaiq / 1 ~' vF "9 .' *M Y' ~}w ~{,s • I 4 S( ~ a~ '~ r ~ I I ~. r r f{ r I ~ ~ E rRT ~ 1' L~~ / ~ ' ~ ~ ~ 'Z"~ ~c ,_~J { 7DY.2fTC ,s • 7DI'f~ ~ T . P" .1•, _ ._ ~f ~T~ ~ ' .1 ~~: z... ~'- •• ~- .~ x~ ,, ~• ~~., -'t'->~FCRM-- STEI~~NS~R~EK.91~E~Il?•. - `''- ~~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ - ,. . _ .~aE _.. E ... ,.- - y,r ~~ -- ~~ ae>,. 1 Drawing Numbc .- Y ~ TM-3 3~4 ®BKF ENGINEERS 14 ~.. ^y_ 1\ ~.' ~ \~ ~ r ~ Y 3 ~ 1 1 ~L ~"\11,1 y ~. 1 I I 411 ~.~ 'Q 1 ~ °- ~ r 1t 1' \~ Ali, b m u ~~~ 1'I'~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ '' 1 1'': f r ~ a Jyr-, ma ,w S ', DD~~'' ~ II ~'I F r 11h 1' .rA h m~ o a II 1 rr~ y. ~ ~ Z<mm 1 1i` 1 '.l j1. Q lfiNYY r 111.' '4 :' ~ ~-\ ~ \ 1 i i N 1 q1 II 'I'. ~ `ar. ~ ~ ,, I'rnn1 j cq~ ~L l Ip~~- 11 111'~1ti1 ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~t 'I ~ ~ 1 Itil 41 ~ A '~ , ~ ~4 ~` 1 ~ y 111 IIii~1 i / - I {1111` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( I ~~ 1 ..s 1 1,11 F. ~ I ~11 1 F 1 IQ, 1 { ~ ~~ / ~ ''1 1 111N11 ~ i \~ ~ ~' 2 f _ •a 1 :11 1 ~. kr u' ot~~vct `s ~.r `. GRAPHIC SCAIE 1 111 ~ ~ ~ ~ z ,~ 1 111111111 v ,~ r'xf, YR! a[[ ~ ~ ~. 11 11' 1 ~ r~ ~ ~ , 1 \111`i1 N11 Y ~ i~;1 ` { n `L ~ •1 ~ 1 u1p1~11{ 1 ~ „~ l ~ „ ~ 'n I-~ I (a me A 1 1 ~~\ /~ h ~ I, ` ~~ 1 ~ y 11 ~~1 1~11'(~} ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ 1 ''~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ Y..' 71'' I ~ - { ~ ,! r,- . ~ kuuw uk Q ! IJ 4 d ~D11 •,~ '- -~ ,< _ .. i' 1 Ntu+[ oexr a,[[ ar ~ ~aT;~ _ Z ` A 1 11111 1 1 111P Wi~l $0 Sj 1 ' ~ 1 .", ~ 1 "~ _ i M' ~ _~_~_ Icrl'E 7R [ N i r 1 I f _- ,.` ~ 1 1. 1 14 r41 < ~ ~ ~ ,. ,1+ ~ 1 ~-~`-,'A-L._.. "M_~~_~ ~ '~~"'. ~~~:,-~ESxz 6 ~*' la. 1 a .~ 1 ~ 11 . Y M 1 k ~. ~ 4~ 1 .I I I -,>~ ~) ,, , ~ ~~ _ F'prc - r-a-i`R" ~ I Q ' 1 i rv ~' ~ ~.FV ~y "F.T - E~~. - V 1 1 ~111~j'V ~ ~' ~1 11 \ 111 Ir ~ f(~°i J' ~ I ~ '_.-` r'„~-'-'~_ .~ll~~ ~~rj~, .. ~ I nz. ~;- 1 1 1 1~,1, 11 1,1,11 ~ ~' ~ b 1'~ ~ Q ~ -~~___. _ ~i-- -~ u ,\ ~ ~~°`*[ 1 ! r. w.1 7 \ 1 tit 10 P ~ ~ , I --~-~,- / '~1 ~' 1 la$1 i 1 1.i.~.r.~y4.,,~~p~5~0010' e~- 11~F 1~' \ I ` ~ d { -1'' 1 1 1 .r'.~ ~ r~r ~ _. ~ \ z ,~ ~ `~ lk ;. 41 'T ^,~,r,'- Fes``' 0~1 ~ I ~I r, 1 '1 1 •` a1 h~ ;, 1 L 1 1 r R ~ h, ~, ~ V I~ 1 ! 1~ 1. ~ 1 1 . I 1 1 ^1 ' : i ~11 ~ 1 1 .,? fi" ~-r o1 ~ , r r r 1 1 ~ 1 1 ~ I.I. - r: ~'~_ ~ s '4w, ~~.. 1 ,.Y L"' Z 1 ju l; t 1 Y J pa.^ z , I r .. ~ - _. - ! ~~ ,r ~/~ ' it '! {t it -i 1 ~- ~-~ ~ 11 . O ` t I JJf 1 1 ~-'~ ~ ~, ~AFL'"jE YI J u ' ~ S , ttt!1, 1 ~. ~ 1 r~~ ~. 1 ~1' ~ r, 'i _ ~.va~ I E r 1 1 1 r 1 t 1 1 1 1 . f: --'„` '~ -~ ~ ~ ~ Q 1 11 1; t ~ 'r ~ CFU'~. 1 1 ''1 1 ~ , '. 1i 1 ~ 1 1/ W ~ K 1 `. 1 1~ ~ y ~ t o 11 [ A < v t 111 1 1 i ' 1 1 ~ ~ 1 . ~ .. ~~' _ - H .d'.-~ ~ _" O _ ~ ... ~ y ~ - ~ } U lI~ 1 !'~i 1 ~ ,i ~~ r ~~ iti- ~ - ~ 1,{ -', ~• c.zw- O '':. kF1.3. 1 d .... ! ~ \`\ ~ ~ ~ y '~... 0 I ~ 1 1 1 1 1 11~, -.-... 1 1111 1 r { a ~ •' rn. - us \ 1~ 1. 1 _7 ! ~ ~ ~ + V '' zags W ~ ~ 50' D10 ~ _ ~ ~ li 1 ~`II 11 ~ti ~ !1 t~~ J.~ 2 i~P ~ !o o.. I ~~ Y all ~~1 1 11 ~ ~ r' 1k 1 1 t~~Y. ~.v.. ~1 zn ~1r~~~ ~^h~1FksE ~ I'r ~ ~~~I~A ~ [ o ~. r AF v ,, .1 111 1 lF ~ d N I r,.l °~. P, S I ~~ ~i L 1 111i~111 I~. I -~ 11'` , t%z 0 Y r E,:_ 1 I l q it r_0 rr. C; r ~ ~ ~1'~i~ 1 4 1 ,'1 p .aa o_-~' P r en 1, A \ 4 ~ I r Z ~) { ~~ } ,,; ~. 11 F 111- , ~ ~ / .,1 ® ~, 11 I ~>v Y ~,' ~~' I W ~ z `1 ~ 1 ` ~ r t" Q I r ,'~ 1 ~ II { I ~, Z Z~ 1 \ ',: r ' ~ 1` ~ r m 50.010 1_.. , - ... ~ ~; v ~, h 1~ ~ i' ~ i`1 1 Iy ~~~ ~ 1 ~1 ~~ ~ J t I ~ ,1 711C'10' PVC I ~ 1 '~ v ,. 'Y ' I. 1 E I) ~ C ' ~^4a. ~~' r•, sro So.m ,r.- - - ' • ; "k` .::zel1,, 1 { v ' - I " ~ 1 .i ;~ 7iT. .x~ ~ 1 .r.r. ~~~ .^aE ~ \ 1 1 ~'~ 1' , _ 1 ~ ~ .~~" i ~'; 11 I ~, a _ `; i; 1~ 1 I ? 'a~xbcA7`; J 4 {•~-~f'',~~-..'-~~ w -a.1 J, F `l`1 ~ 1 `1 1 ~ ~ Y,. 1. 1 S _~.1~~-ra'' 1 j~.l .}" :~'~` FS 1C L'P L.h4L Y ~ ` 1 1 ' I i t` 1 111 T FI !, ~~ mil,-i'~ I~ ~ ~zsi~_o C 1.1 j ~...~ r I 'd f 1 tN;Ef L['_ - ) ~ - s r^#: ~ ~L' 1111 IIr1111 J i 'i- 11:~ ~ ~ 1,F*' 11 -~'-t ?' • >;~ 0 \ ~ :r _ _ ~ Y `~s` ~ i .' u I k~ m D~ ' I 'y Ij `1 1 11!, '~~~ J ~ ~I >, , '1 - y,l .,. ~1 I; ,1 J _ 1 , ;~ 1 ~A` 1 , I ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ r, 1 , 1 11 ~ ~ 1, Q tl' 1' II t ~. T "' r .f _ ea'. .~ 1 1 1 I Z } 11 ~. 1{ { A `~~ 7D~~[!0 1 h vi 1 1171.E 10' PVC I ~ 1 ,_, i ~ ,• ~, I ~ II F \ t ! I I I~ur 10 ~~ , sro So.mo }~-~ l ,~.,. L - ~~ I { 1 ~ lil~r% ' a nl J' ll 1 v~al ~, 3~. I ~1 _~I ~ ~.I { 11 II~I ~ 1 `- 1k ~ I ~t l ] ~ `vsi I '~ { U ~ { { ~ #~1' 11 II1 U 1 1~ {,~ ;. 1 1 X 1 1 , yf:; +; 1. I 1t .1~ ~, a 1 i 1 xl1 ~ 1'1 I ~~ _ Il~ ~ 1 ~+ ~ b. ~ ~, ^~' ( ~ 1. ~ ~ ~ { I F[4r¢, ~; ~z¢L: s`i !~' ,~, li i I IG 11 ~~_{%~oM °' ~~4 ~ " I ~ ~- _ _ 1 k~ _ ~ t ~ _ ! IIh I ~'r ~ I I F ~FF' ~, NI 1 i Y t 1, 4 1 Y ~ _ Ftt m l1tlE {~ ~ .. r..m .e4a ~ I '.e 11 1,141111 1 s 11 m' ~U' Pa '~~- .g. ~ znr- ~ ~~~ ~ y ^1 11 ~ ~ I a~ d ~ ~ ~ s ~r ~ ~ .., 1.1 1 I ~ 1 _s~a.mo - ~^ i ^~° ; _ I' ri I III , ~yrl ~~E ~i,111,~ _~If'f0'P ~~~ ~~ 1~ :1 ,1Y1_V ~ { a { ,11~ I (r ~~i i~ ~1 I I , • VII 1 I , W!13~ti 0,01Q., 1 t~ 1 ~ X~ I I I \ ~~ 1 r ~k ~ 11 ~ 1 _ _~ - ~~ . ~` ^~~ ~~ 1 i 0 I ~ ~1 ~{ ~ I 1 ~I 1 1 ....T \ . \~ `~• i ~ ..~ 1 , E'',` _ z^se ~ I ~ I ~ r ^i lr' I 1 i~ h I' h 1 1 ~ 1 C ! I i• 1 ~ '^ ~ f w+ 1~ ) /~~1'll 1 I 11 . ~ ,~~~ 1~> Ilk cJ, ~ 1 I I i,l 1 ~ i~wrFr+r~i ~ '~ } ir'11 F r?FFS'~~ 1 a ~ ~ -,••~ r ~ r ~r r -c r s~RV U, Ja5'1F ~ " ~ ~~ .~.qp' I A - ~' _ - e I d ,J I r r r I '!' r • ~~ i.. I C~ 7Yy 1 I, ~,•-_- s„ i 1' 1 I I~ ~ l i f 11r ~ I r t l 7 r, ~ w,' J I~ ~ ~~ T '.~ ~y~' Sft~ r. ' _ .ill ~_ -~ ~L11 ~ I ~f. (k ~ L[N.. I'_F.> ~,'/ 7~ 1~ ~ 5 ~~ J ~ -~ ~ a~ .r. ;' ' - ,. - .. _ _ ---' - ~ _ - - r -.~. ---- -~.~ g .,, ~` - - - „„ -- ~. aka _ -~ I § .. ~- ~ •. ` ~~ . ~~~ y' ~ p ~ ~ _T t ~,I = °•' I i r 1 1 -r z -,~., I t--r-~t-~-~ I -~~''~' `rr--~ ~ ~ - _k ~'~`- -- ..~- ~l , , -` D ~ , 1 t r _ yv --~~- _ 'i'-" ~ ~~ ~ 1 _ i Dronlnq Numbx: .? j' / .Es .~~~ TM-4 4~4 ®BKF ENGINEERS { f 1)~ / 1 A \ o ,,. 1 .,,rot ~ !~ ~i ~ i, '. ,.,~I ~ : ~ ~ , ~ ,. ~ t ~n .'`. i1 i ~ i~,l: ~y \ ~ i ~, ~ ~~ b m ~~a ~' 4 ~ I Y L- ~ m m ~ 1' e v H ~ I I ~,~ ,Ii,IIII ,~, ~ ~--ti ~' I^tr a LOT1 o LOT2 - - -~-- B~'ggI I ~k, ~ ', 'I I IYY. Ilh w- ~ \ e Y F.-s~ ---r; , . 1, J U c ° n~ x , ~ X4'111 1 1 ,. ~ ~ ` '~ I ' "~~ LOT 8 LOi 4 1 , I w `^ I~ ~ ~~, ~ ..,a ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ eASeert tFVa. 11 i ~IIiVI f ~ Y ~ TrtT''~ •~ ~`1 ' 1 f ~+ IJI ~' ~ ><~, L I i A SEC710N A { ~y 4~ f ~ 1;, 1 ( 1~' h f~ 1 ~ ~ ~' ~ ,fib J \ ~ 1FF ~~~ , (a _. I >, v-~~ ., t ~ ~. tlk, ~ 1 ' 1 ~i ~ ~. ~ ~,_, , '~P'~ I /, ~ ,~ 7;' 1~, ~ , ~','I+i+~ll~ ~~ . ' /~ ~4 ` ,~~ ~ P~ . ~ y - ~r +e I GRAPffiC SCALE ~ I I'+ ~.. ~ S f 1 _ -'' I i ,1~1 l 4 ~ 1 ,F ~' i~III T , / ~ Fr '~ . ~ --if• _ t~ f~ ~-c~y ~ F~ E _ ~ tlpl,,Vl ~ ~ ~ ~y ~; I fi c __ zxe ~ \~ Y ~~~ 11i1p I I ~ {>.~ '_'. "~' ~" + l! Jj4~ ~ _ ..... ~ ~ 4 :. a.FML ne weer ~.r r i ~-,i ranuao n~cr a¢n x1 ~ w mr I ~^ ' liu v .. i, n5 rt' ~ 'r- '~ V r t Illlllid 1 r 'F I ^'ti '\ ~ °-~ I N -1P~1 / , tl,l~ ~ ~, I au 1 1111 t r ~ ~,~ ~ .. ~ _ .ae ~:- _.. .~F r h:%E '~_'a_„`, ~c.~,~ro _ ~ Illli~ in~~ ~ j ~ a t ~ ~ ' ~ I~ .( ,- ~ - {-}-~~ya~/I-..~...{~~ ~ t .?- z' a 'c- ~ ~,-t ~ ~ ~..-°~`_v., t O I t 1 t ~ .. .~. r _. J , r 1M,0IIV 1' t~1 l .,~I I g11a111 , ~ ''u1V 1 ~ 1 . ,i "c ° ~, ,~ ,k ~" 11- ~ I ! I !'r~MM~l F WN Y C ; ` ' ~~ i~~~' ~, ~ .~'` ~, ~ ~~ I l ~ ) t , r ~ li ~t I C 1 U ~ ~;,! 1 ^ , ' - ~ ,~ ';i4 ~ ~`a-F "'~; ~~~! , L' I i ' I I 1 , !„, ~ I I 1 , . ~ i.. ~a I I ,s _J' '~ .F 7'- ,III 1 S~eYi ss' i 'c Q +~ 1 `~'" ; 'i ',;;11,11, ~'~" ~ fi I r / 1 _ ! ; -1_ ~' p .: t ~° ~~x _~-_ .. `~,.~. ~ -1 1 it , r., ~ .. - ; 1, es~3 ~ b ~ cKi ~_ ~~ ~t T ~ s, y~- bre~t ,, :~ ~,~ ='P~.,~% ;. ~`s'K.,'',". J t A i 1 I, 1~ ~ O Grin'. ')a \ ~' y~ ~~'. 1 ~ r i ~. , _ -- r, ~ -....~ •. \'\ 'E!~! .rt ~~ i7l'T' ~ 4 I \i~ ti it ' f 'I VIII I,~.Si,11 '1, , ~ t 4v' I;-. ..., ~',. OEx;E "ACES ' ', 1,`'1 i ' '\ti'1 .1'~~~ ~-~ `~'' ~ e '~Sy ~ri~} '~\r-`1`z ~~ Fas'• F~ ~,.]Ii:Yl .~E I I Y I 11`11 , ~a a , r 1'f'1 y 1-~`. / Pi ~, \ { .. 1 , ~ r".r, ~ ~. 3, b `^, ', ~'i , ~ d 11 ' 1i IIjh1., ~ V ff~~ir~~~; ~ ~ ~ -~a~~ ~~"\ ~ q', I \ ~'.' ~ 16~ 1. ' ~. I~u`111~,.,11~ ~ i ~~ ' i~ ~cy"1 r ' ,~' T m'.: i a `'-~+~r -c.:- •. • ~ ~-~.~'v. `` '.. \'o ~~', +~ x Z ;~a~-?' ~A , l11' I r1i ,1~~11i. _ ~ ,, V ! d'~ ~ ~ ~~ o „v. K>t--~~ _ ~ ~ y /'-_, y 1,11 ~ I -' ~., i. ,1,11111) N ' j~ ~a _ 1 ,{ 1 'IIII1 1, 1 ,41 n y,~l ~o ^' .e9 1 I y1111~y1,,, 1 ' 11" /yam y , 1 l 1 11111, ,1 l Q r ~'fi.a~~ ~ ~ ~1 ~~ - t ~ 1 \ 1 ~ ? I1 '._ 4thz ~F ~~ }I ~ ~ y~ ~ OJ 1- I,i1,~1 ~JA V- llll O O U ~~ '~• I _i ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 t~ 4 ~ y ~ I ~` 9 zn ~ roJxo o~J{ EuaEO z> I OQ 111 ~ I '1 ~ - , ~ ~ ~ ~i' I' M I I Y !, 1' ,, F 1t,1. ~ ,W', T e. n i ~ it x, , xv G races O Z 1 I 1~'~~1( -d.~w :,~ , ~I. ~ ~. ,~ ~~ 1 pll~l~u ~~ ZLLa I 11~ , .,, ~ _<~ -~ LTA ~ ° ~ ~~~~, ~ ~3 r ~,~ ~~ I z o ~. ~~ ~ Iv1'~ ~ 1 '~ '~~,~' ~ ~4~~= ~ PARCEL 2 ~~ 'II ~ ~~.~; }~ ~,. 1~ ~ ~° '~~`I ~ ` H V yo ' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~.~ ~ ~ 'I AREA I' AREA '~ ~ ~~ti ~`~ ' ~°' r ~ ~ oC> ,.. 11 ~ ~: ~.zn~ ~,,,~, ,,~ `ti.•.. ~fi ~ " ~~,.. W J z 1, ~ ~ *^,.~ 1 ~ F 1.61 AC _ ~ ~ _ i' ', , ,.-- ~l`y fI d'. _. ' 1 ~! ~~`jy(~~ i5it ~, ,. V ilY y , 1 1 1 ~ _ 5.50 A ' 11 1 ~ ~ T 1 .f...~ i 1 ~~~-1 -_ _ r `i^ ,G .~ •~ill l ~ ~ I~ a __ ~ ~ V 1 ` ~ 1 III~~~++~jj'" W ~1' ~- a 11 I ,111` ~I 1~ QNIp9Y#Ir . Y _ _ ~ ~ r ~a ~ ._ l~~ th Il l~ / \ U '1~ t n I ~' O~ESZ,';~„ 5 ~-,~ 1 $ "~~=d-L.__' ~ ~ \4 ~~~ I • ..~ ~ Y O i 11 1 111 ~ f, I 1 18270 i '! tL"' er wr rbrc.~t[ 1 r 1 1 1 1. ,,-~i I 11 i TIP ~ ~ ~~~ - 1~1 • ~ ~ `A"<u fr ...,...~'I ~ `f :Y. ;.:~ ern rzrrs Z3' 1~ ~ '~''~~°"'~~ \ 1V 'd 1 r~,1;1. W 1i~ ~ 1 I~,.h j1f ~ ~-! I _ ~-" ~e ~. ~3~ ~ ,~ r l iii ,. l~ ~' '~P ~I ~, , ~F~ ~ , ..' 10.00' r-~ ~ ~ t,~l ~,~ ,~ ~~ a, ! ,, ~ . 1 u 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1' i ~~~ 1, I ~ '~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~. :~ , ,.T~ ~(~ ~ 6yr+~, o-x, ~r 111!', ~1 I II I,i1 F ~ I'- ~ r , ...1 1 ~ _A-' 1 ~ ~ ' ~}tea- I .~ ~ ,,; x ~,~ ~~ III +! 1 I ~1 V + 111 z,, Q I 7. 1~ I: w 1 ,, U ~ I I 1 11 I NI ~ nro '~ I 4 ~ l ~ ~ ~\_ "I ~ I ~'-~-- ~ .1 I ~ ~ ViV 1~ V O 'iJ t it"1' ao I rr v. 11 I ~ F 11 11 i Y I I 1 ~ °:7 f ,~ 1 1 1 ~ 1' 1 ~ , j t,l I~~44'~ ,, 1' (tOB~B. ~ ~ ,~. , , , , I ~~~ "rI ~ ~ `~~ ..,I ' l1 pr , ~~ 1;' '~ I ~ Il~,.~ Iul~u Z 11 ! r' 1 'd G l~ k e I ~ I I I ~ ~ ~~~+ ~yunn x• w i i 1' ~ ~ II' '~ ~t `' IN ~ s~5~ '~~ ,4 ! _ _r ~ 1 I ~/` _,~ I ~, ~°+ ,,. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~"`;E If { !:YII !„, "~ ~ ~ ~ (~ d i r E O I~, !~ 1 ~ , 1 ! 11~ ~, 1 ~ rss. ~y _.'~„' ~ 2aar Iles. ay, l ~ ~ ~ ~ -.~ _ / r ~ ~ 1 1 F ~ I». 1' I 9r ~ i i I ~ I ~ U I I l , ~ 1 r ~ 1r ,a 3~k' - ~'~C ''N-, eri. ro~ ~~ ~wa~~ ~>~ i :' ~ ~ ~ ~'1 ~ ~ i 1~ ~ I i t ~ / 1 i ~~1' 11 ~ 1~~I .il. 1 ~'~r ~~1 ~~ ~ tizi1•,\~y~ ~~i~ .~ `V~\ ,~~eY. ,~pya, h II~`.., 't, ~ } ~ 1 1 ~ .fig. I 1 t\ \1' oa.~., 1 ~ ~. +"`a^ 1 \\\ _ I~J :'7;"V` L~ ~/ I 4, y1'1111 ~ ~,~ nl4 e~3 1 ~ ~ti~ ~ k_~ , e} IL ~, ~i ~;~a~,,~!~ ~~ ~ i,-..., ~.~ I . ~ ~ . - 1 ~. ~, ~.~` ~ ~. t 4~ ~ '~ ~ ~_.~.. - J ~~„ `~~- /~`'-`; i~_ ~ ~ ~.:. I .K-` I !1I' ~ ~ ~.~i ,y11 ~iH,~l,oer;~ f ' _'~ a •`, a ~~~ I a: I I, 1 1 I, r r r ~ T ~ 1 4 r., a . l i II I B4 I Vr1 .x` ~" >L~ EE: ' r `~~r ~~. ~~~,~ 1 , i ~ `p ~ R ~~~`';, ~~, .~ a ta., e, -~ ~ ; k I '~, I ~ ' II AIL r: ~ :~. ~ . ~~,~ ,~1 r ~1 ~r r~ I11 ~Il~r ~ ~~ ~ ~" _ ~ .~. I _- z ~ ,.,~,. u r r r ~ r r r r r r i ~ ~-11° rJ1 r r. '1nb ~ i ~ _ ` ~ 4 , R Tl~ ~_~u 1.., ~ k \ 11~ ~'- '~.- -'T-' 1--gin ~ {~~ ~ L' ~ y~ .N;i IPcF ~~ C~ ~ ! 1 ^~ _:._.-,~__ '"C: ~ -„_T -I ~I^--~_~_-Y- "~-S7't -___uy,.y I„-T_,,,4 I-~L11L.I11111 ~~_~ i~ ~1.•' ~; _ a, , -=~.-_ x ~'~~ ~ ~~f , _ ~ t~ _ ~ (~_'~'-~' a -x~ ,.-~ 4496 ?' ,, _-.-fir- =. ,=~. -~ ~. • ~ _ ----~t. ., -ter- _ _ f ~. ~~s.. -\ .> _.. ~ _:c;., _ _ ~-_ ~~9 - ~ If !fP~ i FC "' ~'~ D ~~ _.zn; '•~ zu .,nz •' ..:_. s M _ ..a I~ ~~_~ z l ~ ~ l1 fi t1 ~y ~ ~ l f yR ~~ ,n~k ' ~~d~!~~I ~ V i ° 'A r'~" ' ~. '~ ~-~ -,---~- :9 , 1 n % i ~ s STEV NS CREEK BLVD ~ ~ 100 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~f B ~ _ ~iNRN PO(]fE7 (SEE ARCH a Drawhq Humbm --_._- ._...-......._ _.._...___.._~-.--.________- - _- .- _..° -_- J BASE SHEET) . ._ --_ __._..-_. ... .,-..-__._-...--_- ~ C- ~-e 1 ~ 2 ®BKF ENGINEERS 1 7e y : _ ~ ` ' f 1 1 t1 1i ~ ~1 l ~~\ Eo¢ ~ W F ~~I ~~ 2 O X q v 11 ' 1 11 L ~ t ~~' ,', i LOT 1 p s LOT Z u$~g~ 11 1 11 1 F 1 t ~ ~ A - ~. _ __ 1 1 ' ~ r - 1 1 z 1't Ilu, \~ ~~ r a ~ 11 ~ ~VCE r ~` -' Jug ~~~~g ~, 1 1 ' ~~i 1~ ~,~ ~ ~ _'~~ ~--,~ 11 ~. LOT 9 LOT ~ ~~, ~ ,1, ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~1 r ` n 1 r ~ ~ ,~~ . , 1 1 il> ~~ . I 1 11~ 1y i ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ _a~ ''` 1 inu~~,,,, y~~ l ~ :i~~ 11 11 1 1'.11 4° r r. ~:1 ~'~~ ~ '' ~ [.. +. 4 1 l A SEC110N A t1 n.~~i 1 111-.,1111 ~. ~ Y' ~ t ~''~'~'.;mmicrest+cTO~rl_-. \ ~, r ltl ~ ~ ~ `c```,;•.<~; .+_ 111 1 ~ dll ~ 1 ~ a ~ r't ~ v Ty ,~ 1 11 ~ 1' 11111~~~ ,~. ~~`~ `~ ~ 1 ',. A -__ r ' ~, cx~c son[,E _ 1 title 4r T ~~, '.. A •. .I^. •, 111111 d11t~ TI t : / :~&° ! :, '., ~ ~ I x, ' ~G~~ ~ I '~I :'.+si'-. 1 ~' 1 _ ~ 111111111 li 1 1 •' 1 1 111 p1~1 Y 1 :k.. ~~ 1, 1 11~ }! t 11 1~ Inhlld~ ~ a+ r y S~ `I l lulldlnbl~~~i ~ ~`/~ 1~ 1 ~., ~ Ij ll~h 1 ~11i1~~i ~1~¢~111 A I ur,, r r l }d ~ t ljlilllll~d ',,{} 1 1 1 t 11',1,1 I~'1N 1 ~ ~ 1 _ E 1111 ~1 ~1~ 1 , ~ .i 1 1~I IIIlhlulnr p ~; 1 11 l ~1111~1111~1 ~~' 1 ~ ~ 1 1r X111111 PPPI ~F ~ 11111 111 ~- , 111 i. 1 llidldll~:~111. 1 .. 111r. •. ~1 4 •.11~'111111~4~ ~11f^ 111 f-. 1, _le 1~'~~ 1 '1ilfl 1 ~or 1 ~`~ 1~ 111 Ir1 `A ~ Il 1 a 1 Il,_. L t- 11111 ~tt ,1 11 1 LI ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ j1~ 1 ~ 'l ~i'. 1 n Ilu ~'; r 1 t1,11~, `^ ~ r,I 11{'''~ 1 1' i ,1~ . '1 ,1 ~'~;~ -1 1 __ ,` 1 ~ 1 1 1 A4 t V 1 ~ ~ `. 111 11 i 1 x ~ 11 ., , 1 11+`~ w \II , ~ ' 1' ~ ~ r... 1 ryl~ - 1 ~ f~ w ~1(~~ 1 1 i r~: 4i~ ` 'u Ito' ,, rid l n. ,i 1 1j 11 ~I 1 11 .,` V 1 ~, i ~~ 1 ~~ ~ f i F ` 1111 I r: , a~` 1i 111 ~''1 1 ~' { 1 It, ti It J 1 ' 1 ,1 1 11> ~ ''1 1 1 :A 1 T ~\ .~ ,,1 . 1 /1 1 \~ 11.. ~ t ,- `~ .: au.~T ~~~ ~. ``~. 11 :I `.,~ I ,., ~,, ~ } „~' ` - _ 29E9 )~ 111 , _ 1 \ I ~-~` ,u?IS.XC [IECI2FC Ai L (91 /Qt IR •• r ~t~Jll ~, L ~ ~ I~; CR~JIL fJE..U RFC .! r I ~ ~~~ . ~ `bt Il 1 1 ~.' ~ -~ 1` ~ sT `± ~ ~ c.y ~,~~ -•N 1~L i 1 ~ < ~ !. .. .. y~ t ~. ( rr I 1 ~ ~ yl = es.+( 1 ~ ~-.rt,--~rze ~ ~_ 'r' k r vFr \Y~ _ - '~, Q r I ,~ n~ RI x ~ ~ e i 4, J_.5__ Es ems ~. I + J ~® ~ ~•:b I ~~4 1 i` (i I ~``II eey F ~_~E,-".~ __` \ 421<.(, ~1 ~-r- ~ V ""~q1 ~ .p r ^~~ ' ~-f'"? 11 1 1~L t r 1 1111/11/ I''~ 111~~T1 ,1i 1'~1 11 ~Sb9'b 55' ~ 11 1 11J - - /~ ~ ~,(\ -r< , . ~ 1 J .~sti .. ~y C7Ci,'_ r _~r.. ~I~1 ~;~,~ '") n w' r Y x„ vcE. I , i. 1 i ~ ~ Ir 1! -'Z ~- . 11 r.~: 1 ~ 1z 1 '' w.~..` 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~~~~ e ~ `e,~ _-`933= sf, ~ /y F( _ 1 t '. ~r~ ~ .., i~ 1 1 F 1. 11 1 1 1 i ,...~. A k•_, 1 E 1 '1 1 .f ( L ~~ ~ ~ ~ , aes Q i 1 ~i `l 1 ~.- . ~11 -_l ~ ~l1 1 l_ ..l" ~' COMMON p~ {~~~. ~,;' F :~~' ~ ., ~~! F~~~~r~~~~P ``II ~ LLa „{J1~ jf% ~ ~;4 ~1' ~In ... 0 Ha ti'1 ~~ I ~ l ~ ~~?3+~.1 4y ~:il ~ z~ Z ~ ~Vl ,rns ,1 ~ 1~ ~ 1 V ~ ~ ~ 1 LOT A 1 ~~ a „ . , W 1 ,, ~ ° ® ''1' ~' II PARCEL 2 i~ , ~, : i,` ~ ` ; ~ ~ ,'`1,!'` 'I' ~ U WF ., ~ ; ~ ~~ _ 1 f 2E II AREA ~ ~ 1 ~ ~, ~~ ,, WJ 1 I I R t`_ ~ ,. ~ tiw ~ 1 _~f_ - ~ - `--~--~~?~6'.'. - ~.... ,-;---- Nil ~ :~ 1, 1,1 P 1 ~ ~- _ ~, - ~ ' 1 ~ I:<s / ~.EV nr, ~c ~1. , ~ . - _ 1 I 1 \ 1111 1{~,- ~ a i I 16270 _ - iY,/ ~Nk u. •,( ~' m. l,; + x.. - ~ ~~ '.1 }~ 111 I ' A.~:+ I - ---- '1~ r--- '~e~- ~ r_ +' n~rr-et. ~, ;,.r ^. ii r . • r 1111113 ~1 W ~~~ { "V i 1`•. ~~ ~ ~ ', v9~t'V,. ~. -t yd ! i ~j•., eE: ,3;y1 :~ 1,4 lip '~ c-h*vF~ui 111 1alu I1 1 ` li'1%I~ IA Z 1 d lB.1QdLd ~ ~'~ 61 woou I 1 ~ t.`'- 1 1 ~ ~ r«, ,- ~39 11' 1 r w 11 Ili.•w:; 1 :'" i ~, ,,: ~-- 1 11.1 11 1 11 r 6 ~ :rte ', I~ ~. i P 1 90 ~EY~1 L 1 _ S( ~ ..... I I I 1 I/ ~ Z of a FL+uv~ ;--ETO 8 ~ '~ ~.~.. r . ~-r-l-~ .--r.: -- ~ ~~ ~~°~ ~ ~ Y ~~.,.~ t' x1n 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 1 1ij ~I,i~~~ I~ ~ ~~ ~ ~` ~` w 1 v 1 a I lY~~ a E w Ill I r r r I I' 1~ 1 )) L~.._.-_.._ _ ~ n~ E 1 I/ 1• f l q ~I~P k[Ec 1 '( ~ i ~ i r ~: r i 1 I 14 ~ i _~~, ~ ~~,a°' 'i 1 (! ~~ F `a~ ~j I i' 1 ~ ~ U ~.i Kt zv. nese- xw /T-- y .t"~ - ; \' ~ I ~ I~" } - r ~ ~ I b ~"" " I I . ~ I I rJ ~~ 1 ~ , I ! , ~ , ~,. _ _ 1 a ~ 1 Y .~"'r'~ ~' ', 1 i~ n ~pqE~ ~ 1 r ~ l J I i i I r-r- ' 11 1' 11 ~ ~" b '. 1-H;.~-f~ 1~-°~-~- ~`(. }JZ++- ~_}'',~°-" ~--- ~r (~' ( 1'IJ i 1 ~ ... r - 1+-~~ ~,~ .'~ 1 , ' 1~ ` 1~, 1 y' r ~ ~ 1 , r ',i ', ~-'E'I ~~.. _ 'el r ~•, ti ,rr;~',`~'1~' %. ~ ~ Il ; ~ ~ '~ ~''Il .r fill - 1 y" , ~~ , 1 / ~ '~ I E ~9~ 0~~, r '•~ROiedA Ct P n,,3~ .a=~--~ '-!~ ,1r ~ is r ~ ~ ~'~ rI ~..i 1 ~V 'S~`` ~ ~ ~i ~ ~. ~ 1~ i~rl~ ,,,alts 'r ~ _ '-T' -= 1 y} ~ r 1 I I i.. iLr! 1 r i r ry' ' ~'~ r'•a C,!• \ r ~ n.. waV~t.~.y 9r rl I ''~~~. /' a ,_ r , ~~`\•` •~1~~, y ~-~~' Wc.~4~~5~~~1! '~I`IT I~r~'~ ~ !~ _s-~~~~~4~U arri r=~r~~:-,~ ~ `~I __~`..~~y { p- ~ .J...,. 44.95 ~ \ Iti__. --".,_ ____ -- ~::•~_--~_ `-~ _- _ _ __~ yen ~~ _ r t Jf _ ~ ~ _ _ Y` y i - - ~~ _ - - - - - --- ~--... _ ~ 1 -~=- ~ ^- •, _ . , , »s_ 1I) j~ ~1 ~ ' ( is _ 1 .s?+-~ ~ \...,~,~~ ~1 ~ • 1 ~ ~i i ) ( 1,` l ~ I'-r,': "'.'-~-r"~- _ r -,-- ' ~ -- -'i.~l-__ i \ ~ - i 1 ~ S ~ R STEV~NS CREEK BLVD ,uRN POCKET c~ AAA `1- ~ ~a•~9 N~~ _ _......... ......-....-~..-.... C-' __._--___~_-___-_. W ._..._..~, BASE SHEEN .. w - 2 ~ 2 0 BKF ENGINEERS I I '1 ~ rp '~ ' 1 ' • ,' 1 ',1 ,~ ~ `t'om-r- 1 1 ' ~ ; ~ ~' It. ~ t~s,n i~l'111ti ~ 1 ' ,,1 ~ ~~ I ~4 0 'n ~ ~ "" RT ~ . 1 a ' 1 ~ ~; GRADING N01FS: 1 / 11 I"1~1~I~f~,~ ~ ~.4~•H~ 1~ NEW AC SURFACING AND PARKING STALL S71tIPING ~ ~ 11 Y V 1 II i `.~ i ~ ~gm J '11i 1 '~. ~ ~~ ~ ~ -q ] d~~l 2Q NEW PARKING ANC LANDSCAPE ISLANDS g8 I I f it _ B~~'mu ¢ e~ ~~ ' ~.1a#~! 1 ' - 1~ 1 ;,~ ~~ ~ ~. Q3 EK BUILDING BEING DEMDIlSHED AND REMDDELED ~kl, 1 ~ 1 ~ r ~`,11~1~ ~' ~, ~ .~ h ~ NEW AC SEC710N AND PARKING ~ a~~~~ 1111 II ~' (I~~„~~1!R ~ i ~ ~~~ 1 ~~ ~'1 I ~'`~ ~ 4ECETAIED BIOSWALE, 4' WIDE MINIMUM o 1 1 1~n 1' 11 ~ (, A ~ ~ ~~, ~ - ~ ~ ©NEW 5' MADE SIDEWALK i,~l 1 4 ~ 1 1114 Itl, `' ~~ ~. i ~I '~J; 111 ~~,~11 z Q,- ~ ~ ~W ., ~ ~ ~ .~~ ,~ 1111 ~ 1 +} ," 1 ~ rulll! v 1 b r -k z~ I 1 \ '~ `~ `J ~ ~ ~`~ ' C W Q; tIC'7 R ' 111,'li!~`' ~ ~ . ~`?.~` ~- ~ tt'' GRAPffiC SCALE !yF w.~ 11 ,Ili 't~ A•''. A E ,FC a\ rp• 1 ' 111.111! >[I I _ ~ ` ' ~ •'` ~ ~ /~ ` j _ 11'. \11111111!1` ~ ~ 1 ~ / ] :•~i •`, ~,? ~*e~L,l I •~;l"~~ ~ i7 Y I ~ ^ 1 p 11i1 1 1 1`111p1 ~ 1sse ~~~ ~. l 111 ~ , ~, Dota ~ - •za ~ ~ ~,: , ~ ~ 1 ~~' YY^^11 1 `,1'111 1 c \ \ ,P;,-.. rJ S ~1 ~f 1 . •. ~ ~~a ~ u+n ul.uvt ~~ X111 1 1 < ' ti~ _ - ~ [ r.en n =.cueE~ ev ~ 1 i 1i11n~ i. ~ ~, r ., 99IR • ~ ~ 1 ~ ! '• w 1 ~ '~, `I ~~~1m x 1 e 1 ~ ~ z1 ~ ~ _ 1~ .~,h 11 gt.' [ ,eic~ ~ l N ~ 1 1 ~ 11 1d wl - 1 1, t ~: A ..,., ......_- E ~ ... _..5~'h .. "I .,. _` _ -!~ _ r~ r. ri[ f~, " O ~~„ 1 I _ 1 1111 1: `-t i mom: ., _, .. ., d 1 _ ~ ~~~ # P'IIn11~ 1 ~1 4+t^~? 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _. -~ .~ h~ A qp ~ ~4, . 1 ,~ 11 Id -^ .r. 1 1 11!111 J .h ~ 1 1 ti PI 1 1~ ~ 1. •~ ! 1 1 ~ r 1 r i .K ~~. ~' 1 r~ ~ 1' 1! f 1 ~r e \ 1 11' -~ `ice 1 h ~ ~ -- 11 ~11 11 j ~ t~~ ~ .1 ~ m, . A 1 - ~ ~' ~ r .. 1 ;~ ~ ` i ~ `111i1`~. 7 1( 1'~' l1 fib 1i- 1`e6 TM E. 1 ' 1 1 •~ , 1 ~ _ y1 .r} Y / \ h i 11'~'lll i' i '!~ ham{ ~ ~ - IFl ~ / V - a ' _ '•.. ~~ ,-~•- Z 11 W~!11' r i JI 1 f_ `"bi-' ss" ., b c, -"v z .~ z S ~`~, ~rla ~ -, ~ Q y11 ~~. ~ I ~ ! , 1 1t ~ Y ,, .33 ^1 O 1 hn i ~ ah f cress 1 ,,, ~, ~,1~ s, '\ V'1. Al\1A \;z1 ,~~ 1 ~~14" ~1 .~o ' _ -\ A~''~I. 'a IYI, J F-o u R 111 , ~, 1 .n,, 1 1 ..,,1. r~ ~ 1 1 ,, ,, _ 1 Ir ' 11~II~. 1 / ~ ~'' z '~ k .. - __. 1 r .:1 ,•! L~ .~c~~~ V ~ I I 0 m 01 \ ~ ~ ,y 1 F mc. r~~ !tJ x..tm I Z ~ K 1 1~ a+ T t; '~ -A'L~1 I I 1 I'~ r:n. ~ECi I = J ,a !'r91i PI 1 y (~ ~~ /y ~/- 11~ ~ P u. l~l"~1 .I- ,~ 1n 1 G n 1y fl~~` a~~An~ Ki Q i V~1 ~ y , , 1. •~ ® w 1~ ~ ~,; W , , ~ ~ Z ~ ~ .,1 ;r~ ~ I ~~~ I ~ ~ ` t ~ __ x ~ ~,`."~ 11 ' d a ~ p 1 ~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~ s ' ti. 1 ~ ! .k ~ \ 1 ~;I~ - , ~ r/ to i 11.. R 1 I, i. {1 }. t I 1 i A7E ~i }' ~' 4} Ffi M u~'LYiL b ~ i' l ~ 1 1 a 1 q- 'PHASE 1 - LI ~8F ~ _ ,1 ~1 r ~~. ~ / ! 1. S' 'L`~ ^. 'IFX F h V" 4 ~ 11 1 rT f 11 1 1~ ~ 111 I ~~Y`' " ~ 7RErU11EM ~ t n ~ ( ve c ~ 1 1 1~ i `1Y 4 I `~ I A f ~ ~ i ~~, 6 r :•~ - ~ ~ ~ 1 1 111 VI i ~ y I I ~~ r F a~ ~ l lP 11 i` I, U. ~,Urf2ti 1L.~~ 1• ~~ I ~c .1 `1 1, N 11 ~~ + 1'~~; _ Z ~ louo I ,~-:.. t .. - ~ t I, ~ ! 1 I ,~ , ~ i ~1 ,~ ~ 1 G { - ~' ~' ~ i~ fit. ~ 1 .1 I Wd 1 ~ ~~ ~~ ••~ 1 ~ ~~ 1 ~1 r~ 1 „ I ,. ', , t I I q ~~ I/~ , ~ ~~ ~~ 'aA 1t I~~ ~, ~'~ ,~, ~~ I ~ ~ ~ . o ~"~ ~~1 ~,~ ~~ ~ I 'Ira~uvl :~loa n 1. ~ 1 ~ 1 ,, ~~ `~ ~ ~ i 1 ~ ~~ ~~ U ,..tl` 1 11 ~ ~ 1 ~ rr ~ ~ 1 1 1 .>r~ 1 >= ( ..-' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .o: l i ~ ~ .~ ~xETr. II ~1 ".~° ~1 '.~ ~ . ~, i 11p E 1•, , 1~~~ k 2 ~ 1~ , ` I ~. ~ s i ": r ~ ~ 1~ + '6. ~ ~ ~' I ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~" ~ ~~"-`-i, 1i X11-~,, 1, '~ ~ 11 ~ ~_;~. 7 ~~ rk ~ 1 za 1 I t ~ ""v`l,~ 1 ~, n •~ • 1 ~ ~ ~ ¢ ~. '~ Y ~ per. '/- 1 1 ~, e;, 1 1. _ / 1111 1 I ~ 1 ~ r~ E ._I L I Imo''- CI V' i 1 - ' -- i , r, V A r~ 1 '~ i, I b 11 I 1{,~ '~ -. / 1 1 -.~ Yae yy O I' I 1 / tI/ I mac. f - .. ! ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ 1 r ~ ; ~ r , r ~ 1 ~ ~'i~ ~ ~ ~' ~ °'~ `~ ns '~b~MR GF we ~ ~ ,.. 1 I BMP NOTES: ~,~ ~r ~ ~.- ~ ~ " ~ I j . ~ ~ ~ 1 ' -'o ~ `~a ~ ~ -SR ~t ~ ~ ,: T '~ . _ .- _~ 1. ALL SITE RUNOFF WILL BE TREATED BY ~' ~• 3. ~*,, r ~~~ ~.-- `'~ - ` '" } ' r. ' ~ " ' ,:, ~~ ~~' .` t MECHANICAL UNIT CDS UNIT (MP-51). ~ '~ ~- -= ~ ^~ ~ d w+:ar ~-~+ ':, ~ = ..._ ~4~ '• °" ~, • __ _ r _ _ __ ~ --~- coriPDR~==y-~- -- _ _ "~ ~ - s ~ ro R~IaN,.. ~ ~; 8 ~ 2. TREATMENT SWALES (TC-30) WILL TREAT A.., •' •~ _ . - '~- - •• ,.- -S~'Ey~NS~REEK ~VD•_ ~ _ _ _ ~° ~ 1 '; ~ PORTION OF THE SITE RUNOFF. _ _ ~ - ,G _ ~ _ % 1 ~ ~ y ~ ~ , _ ~; ~~ ^a k i~~u aw. a ~'~~ nl~ { \~ ~ 1f:r~+a1' P, bl ~; d' ,Ip ~~`c~-;r-~ :,r;,1 'r~ '~~~ ~- _ ~ }" _ .. ~i pr' _ ~ -' :,, % T n,s DrawNq Nunbar C-1 ~~ 1 ~ 1 ~. 3• N ~ ~F~~~ X ~~ rQ z~l ~ ~ Dy~ ~ VQ ~Q Q r ~ N _~ ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~- f'D ~~ ~P ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ E R O fl y, yy r ~ ~ ~ ~ a4 C1Q ~~~ ~ ~~ r z n `C w N _ ~ n l J D~ g~ ~ ~"' ~~~~ ~ AN NN mm Pt` > o n ~ ~ ~ ~ s~~ ~ Z ~y~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~g r1~i D- mD VY d ~ m m 7~~~ N~ a ~ ~ ~ ftl O ~ ~ A ~d ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ i~ r e ~ ~~ ~- N Ozz 4~ ~~ r ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ UQ ~ ~ ~ >~~ CD D• ~ ~ ~ °; ~., r O ~ ~O m O A ~ ~ E ~ e m ~ ~° m ~ A _~ _ ~1 J o ~ Z ~-' ~D (''~~Q ""~ l U D ~ D J r U J m z 0 m ~z °z o ~ SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY THE OAKS MIXED -USE PROJECT ,~'S u~ ~ ~~ , ~~ P{{ Spa. ~ Z ~ ~ s ~ p 489 S. EL CAMINO REAL HYWAY 85 & STEVENS CREEK BLVD. ~ ~ J ~• C N ~ ~ F ~ 9 •.~ ~0 `~' m ~ m m SAN MATED, CA 94401 CUPERTINO, CA °P•~q ~1~+,° ~ ~R fvEi ~ "s aarrrn eam s a na nrar xo eraram ^ rasa n x errz ena~ s<s ea an mm Mom m-ue o amcrm n erc mrim, r ens a ~ ran, s ones arc o exw xo aonurae xmre x~ mea w eo eoro sue ex an w rn mmcr em arar Dorm s eraurer mere[ rmu rra ems a ar ~xia a ae osren u g Y OO N O J R Ix !. W N ~ ip O ~ P ~ A W G 1o R V A P j R 111 A 4' u J O N b P R N A W u ~ ® N O N P Ix • W u N p N ~ J 0. ~ } ~ u ± O ~ O J a• N A W ~i W ~ ~ d . ~! A In m a G u P N U ~ G V U e U ~ U T ~ u1 a. J U a a U T A U =. N A N F U G - 3 G In ~: 'l: a ~i A ~: S U U 0 U 6 N ~ U ~ 7n s` . ] U A . R 1i 6. u a u w ~ U u N u p, a 7 U ] ' 8 F N U W U A -~ " R N p N [y a w u U ] S u N j, N a_ '.j O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ y`I ~`1 y ~ K ~ ~ i~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ m ; 3 ; 3 3 3 E ; E ; E ; E E ; 2 ; ; i T k~ T Wy i ; N i T m i T kP i U O i T V Q { fii 2 Q ~ M T i U pP i ~ kV ~ pV T V k T O T V -G m i T V i T U p i ~ fy r ~ y ~ ~ i T @ g i L i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ < D ~ < m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~p L ~ ~ ~ ~ i 9T i -qa i '9- ~g ~ ~ T9 ~3 i ;3 i T9 ~ ~ 3 L~ i ~3 ~ ~ ~ ;3 ~ ~ ryn, i ;g ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 Fl ~ ~ ~ ~9 ~ ~ ~ 7ry~~ i ;9 i ; ~ i ~9 ; ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ } ! ~ ~ D y } ~ ! ~ ! } ~ ~ ~ ~ } ~ ~ ~ ~ p L A D 7~ m m m m Fi in In m ~ M fn m ~ m n m i m r~i r i ~i A A rai ~i iF ~i i ~i r ~, J x x x x x z x x z z z z x x z z z x x x x x x x z x x z z x x x x x g~ m N x x % % % % % % % x ]~ 3 3 O aaa vas a :....... ^ Q Q 2 o ~~ pG5 ~ ~ F o ~ } s '~ ~ in ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ?' A N ~ D u ~ ~ ~ LL l t ]8 D y V 0 ~ V 0 0 r i i ~ [ ~ D ~ ~ - q i $ v m ~ D ~ a , y [ E ~ 171 ~ 1- ~ y s ~ F'' ril 6 ~ ~ ~ 111 1~~1 ¢ ~ 5 e R, __ ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ R ~ 3 b o°°O ~ =s ~o ~ ~~ ~ ~ D ~ f~ni rn rn~ O yy y r 001 IU -~ A j tl rn 8 ~ ~o A o ~~ 0 ~ j p ~ ~ O ~' Z ( Z ~ i ~i1j1 Z ~ p ryA Arn~ ~ <~ rO ON D ii tl ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ A ~ i ~ i U O E d~ -p p ~O rnA rn o~ D ~ = 1~ 0 A~ ;N ttl "11 N N ~ ~ mm< P z rn rn A ~D NXDX pp DA A ~~ a m ~~ ~ N ~ ~ N 3 ~ rn N 6 ~ N P Greg G. Jng & Associates xsssmAa>,~ S~TO~ s+Ahbe %1~ MATCHLINE -SEE SHEET L2 tea.. ~,~ . ..... ~. ~. s......~.~.. 617] ~ _ ~~~~ ~~~~ '_ ~.' ~~~~ L y J ~ ~~~~~..w ~~~~~~a ~a ~~i~~~~~r~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ . 1A41 ~ N EUC. ~ To REMAm ' • ~] 1• ~ NO 7/ O 4 0 ~ ' N - ~ ~ ~~ y . ,TRASH u ~ ~ 0 ~ -, ENCLOSURE ~ _ ~, -~~ ° ° 1 ua ~ -- ' _T,T _ E RETAIL 5 9TF~ o~`~P P ; ' ,~ ~ tiA~~ NEW LOC rT 980 S ~ 9 F S • PR '. ATION OF TRANSFORMER 1 • c~ ~ '' .N - ,._..~ o PAD CS 9 - -0 . ~ p ~, ~ , .. ~ .. - -- Q EE N0. BA / ~ - ~ - - _ .O • ' U CO LF .._ t E 6 I ai ~ i I ~._ .~.. 0 0 ~ W ~ ' ' ~ ~ ` CLU9iEA PEAR N0. fi9 LN fib M1 n ~N/ n LL ~E) j OANC .~~Jb .,, b' PEPPER ~ ~ ~AG I60 ,c• u~ 'D 0 &9 . ., o ~ .D'.. _n---~ o -a - ~ .0 ~. d prAy-. ~ ~ ~ ~.. ' LPL W ~ TD REMAIN Ib E6GAL 5 1 ]8 0 . TAC N ~ ~ ~WDOD MULCH ONLY ~. t6' iREe ~ ~ , 4 T (n ~ Z I . ..~ _._, . :~ .~. ;~ . ..~ :TAC F7 7 YO 70 ~ ~ IG JAPAN SE . 1 REE NO 104' : ~ 1 W EUC . TO REI/NN ~ '.. .. _ _. . 9. \ ~,.A I $ ~ NA9 0 iA~~b4 W LWL Q ~\ Q I ..~ ~ / /~ r U E - ` .. X 3 STORY b. I ~ ~ 0 70 REMAIN . FI NG, i rPEPPEA;N ENTAIL /~ ,~ E RETAIL 4 Y ~ Z \ OFFICE/ ' II 8 000 S.F ~ o a w ~' ~~• a CONVENTION ~ ~~ , E RETAIL3 '-'~ ~ . TO RFAWN TA . ' CENTER ~ 9,587 S.F ~ ~ , o } ' . ,. .' ~ ~ Z 6 Eo EA iA 0 ~ O .. 0 0 0.. O ..,.~ ~ ..~ ~ I:. Q N I J >s• GAH a ~ , ~ N ASI ', .O •• - ~. ,'~ ~ 'N0. 101 '~ C L 0 ~._ ~ . r 9 r ~ ._ ' ,.. . ~ ~ .~. NMtE J o ', ; } Q Z E - ~ F- N 6 EP R ~~ I"I T 9 N'~a Lll ~ p~ __ ~ z Q U _.. _, • .r.. -- _. ,, _ a Q _ ._ . . _~ ~ U W ~ ~ 55 . ~ fi ~ ~ ~ - ~ • = W Q b ._ G Pb 0. 9fi ` b• N0. • O •X0,98 NO 99' r rAEE N0 1 ~ 1 ' Q G GQ PI _ _ ;- 0~_ ~ N0. 101 \ : z p~ Z ~ ~ ~. ~. _ PNE Nc. . ~ CA 'V ~ TO REMAIN _~ ~_ ~ DATE: il' PINE G 18 NO F _ _ REV. N0. REV. DATE ' ~ INE G R '20' Pi {A N0. b ~ ~ _ _ 04.17.08 - -' ~ ~ v -, ~ S . 0729.08 P NEW ; _ ~ G , ` MENT a AsN TAC ass Xo. ss ..~ ~ SIG • • • xo. zs • • i _ _ a91 TAG N1 NO ZB 28 ~~ NO Z7 pl x0. t '~. N0. Z/ ~ i4' A9N N0. Z3 ~ 74' A9N N0. Pl MO 2t IB' OAN iAG ~] t PI ~ ~__ TO REMNN 7o~ewN ~ ~ TREESUac~x•~ - CONCEPTUAL ~.._._...____._ "s"' TO REMAN TO REMAIN -- LANDSCAPE STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD PLAN (SOUTH) ~ NORTH ,~ L3 ~ CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN (SOUTH) - ~°~ ~p E RETAIL 1 ~~~ ~ ~`;-__ ...y ., (SHANE C0,) i NQ 9 ~~tiGN• ~ - ,f ~ ~ Greg G.Ing TAe ~° & Assooates ~/ Na nia - u ~ ~ ssasr>~.w~+, swrim T~ REF 1 W "~ 9 ~.,, ~ N O~n u• n,N rAC R~ Na a Z P S„-iw~ y ~~y~ ~~ a .. ' • (•jOU TAE ~... ,_ ~ V•_'°L . "' PRIVACY g"g A k ~. HEDGE _. " ', ,~ ,. _.... ~ Nn. aw ~ E • '' ~ ~ - +e' ouc Tu h xa e TAO ~.77 e~ ~ • • ~ S~ ~ ~~P - w• ar<TAC nm No T (EJ MONUMENT ~ TFDF ~~1f° ~ ~~ YOMl N6L POOL ~'~ QA PERENNIAL GOLOR .' SIGN ,.-, _ _ IN PLANTMG ISLANDb ` LOCATION ~ ~ - 5 ^\~ - ~ ~. Op ~..... - - - - 0 _... - v \ ~`~ ~: BACKFL0W I- '; ~ u PREVENTION , _ _...._ COLOREDS (,) m ~ W ~~~ I"1 DEVICE ~. SCORED CONCRETE 5 • PAVING STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD a ~ ~ ` ~"~~ <.. PINE ® . "' ~, .., .,., ~ TO REMAND AO~N ep .. -.___. , ... - W U 4b ~ CONCEPTt~AL STREETSCAPE PLAN FOR > ° -. SOUND WALL X ~ U `E' - \ -~ "" , _ RETAIL 1 (MCSHANE CO.) ~ ~ ¢ ~ - Y ~ Z _ ~ - ~ ~ ~'. ~. W000 MULCH ONLY. 10 Q $ PINE Y~SAEE ___ Z TO PEMAIN T TAL /im - . . . - ~fi I=" = U - __ -, .. .._- - ~`~.;. TO REMAIN ~ } Z - O 01 ... - Z _ O ff c T O ~~1 _ Np C ~I b r ma f,, ~© ~ ~ ~ TREE TO - TAC , -~_-_.. e REMAIN N0. .. ~ W r ~O qq ~ <,: ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~I W ~ ~ 9 O EI1C. _.._. - - - TO REMAIN ~ e _ _ _ T TO REMAN O Z_ a e Z ~ tY . . - NOf N ~ C U I fA0 {L' /~ L HOTEL Na>e "T ~ ~ `~ _.,- a ~ o w ~ bb ~X 122 UNITS `~~ ~ J ~ ~ e ~ ,• >, T~ m 4 -STORY '~ ~ - ~ NEw z W ~ ~ '~ a ~~~ -MONUMENT ~ ~ o d TOE) PREMAIN T 1111 11 Q ~ .SIGN - '. ~ Q ~ - 1~~ ~. ~ 3 -___ aC ifaE e SOUND WALL ~ ~ R~WN, ~ ~ .. 0 _ . ' 11 DATE: y~ 1 ~ REV. N0. REV. DATE e - - t M0: h ~' Y ID ~ W000 MULCH ONLY. ~ • • ~ ~ ~ 04.17.08 ~ TAF nTI; ~~--_ ~~~ G __~ LOCATION OF 11 ~ ~ / `. ?` ~ OAK - - TRANSFORMER - ,r ~ a ,'~, `Ta REMNN. ~ pqp NEW - X LOCATION OF _, °•"~ -- TRANSFORMER .___, `~ ONCEPTU C AL ! _ _ LANDSCAPE PLAN - MATCHLINE -SEE SHEET L5 - ~ PHASE 1 ~ N NORTH ~ NORTH L4 ~ ,~ ~ CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN (NORTH) SCALE:1'=20'-0" JOB No.: Greg G. Ing ~rAssoriates ~~ 7595TheAhm~da, s~7m s~~ au~ urns ~m ~..~ ~ b MATCHLINE -SEE SHEET L4 -----'_- - --- ~~ ~ ---------------- ------ - ---- G ~ ---- --- .'_~ ` i - - --- --------- --------------------- ---- = r Eua. 10. 74 ~ ~~ ( ~ Nn 1M1 TonENaMS \ , - _ ° © / ~ © O r~n~ r,T, I ~-, _.. E RETAIL 5 9, g age ~'~ ~F~ ~ ` 19,980 S.F r~` ~ ,X ~ ~ - --- ~ ~ ~ Ma n v 7 ~ '/T 'M ~ .. e •F a e - - _. -. ~ Ma ee ' . J ~ U _,. ~- , _ ~ ~ Y m ll.l ~ T --- - C4 ~ ` o r , ~ L11 '' .. . (N) BOLLARD . `., LIGHTS ro ausax ~ a °° ' ~ ver,w ~ se - - ; ~ W 0 ~ xa.a A w ~ P~ ' ha ~°° o. a ~ ~ ~ o. c o -.. a- - ~ o ~ a o q P:L~ ~`. ~ .. U y ~ ; To RP N . mcuisn s , i ' ' a s y ~ "N00p MULCH ONLY X 16' TREE ~ ~ 'M0. ]E . i i , ~ G ~ ~ # R) ~ ~ ~ ~ y 44: ,~ .. ~ Z i ., ~ ~ '~ Id',wNifg ~~ N6 W 1 Ll.l (E) EUC, _ i ~ ~ i ' d PfM~ N0: 94 ~ - yr' ~ ~ ,410.T10.S~ 1 - ~ W W TO REMgIN / i ~_ Q ` U e ~ ~e~ d ~ - •a ~ ~P~N . P ~ -- ~ ' , E RETAIL 4 u~ ~ z ~ Y ~ ; \ - , `~? • 8 000 S F o a w 9 / a , . `~ ~ E~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ E RETAIL 3 ~ w o_ ~ . TO REI ~ ~ dA1N ~ ~4•.P~ ~ ~ - 9,587 S.F . ~ TAC ~7 ' - ~, } o . •. - .:._ r o' a o ,,. o o o a a c o' • Q C ~ w m _ .. , I ~ '~ ~ ~~.. 9 ,. ~~ . ~ _ ~~ U J ,, ,r . ~' Q ~ ~ ~r r~o M' ~d r _ ~ j W S , a ~ , -rw Ma z ~ ~ E ~ ~, -. h;.~__ i W C~ O ,~ - ~ __ Z Q a . 0 _ " w 1 ~ ~ s ~ J ~ ~~ (E) PYL0~1 Tic •'° - 1 n ~ -~, r ~ r ro ` ~ W Q ~ ~ _ _ "~SLGNiO_~`---~ - - - "a ae . ~,-. ~ tea w• r, mrt Mmaaa_ 4 ales to sm ., ~ .. ~ ~ f/j ~ T~~c REMAIN E ,._ _ - . 1 Z ~ Z C O ( I N0. RNE ~ ._ v ~ ~ ~ I 2 TO REM4N i DATE: I \_„ 14' PMF ,, TW iA NC. ST - - __ ~- _ -_ f ~' - REV. N0. REV. DATE • a ax ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~-'_' -- ~ 04.17.08 ze •w TAa p1 Na 1a ~ ' ' \ • • ,~ a • ~ ', ~ ~. • ~. _ _ ~'tiw nc pl N0.m ~ 4 ; ' . _ ' ... - , ~~ y , !16 A X6 7! ..... '10.4 i ~. W A91 M0. Yr i N A71 IMI. 71 \~ a 1d OM( TAa R7 jj '., _ -' ' ,. .. i PINES ._.. - ASH ~... `\ / `-- CONCEPTUAL I ToNEewN ToaEM,w ~ w ~ µ ~ ~ ___ LANDSCAPE PLAN ___-- ~ ToA M P F1 WN PHASE 1 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD (souTH~ N NORTH L5 ,~ CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN (SOUTH) SCALE:1°=20'-0' JOB NO: ®HKf ENGINEERS ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~'',.~i1 ~~~' "~~ ,~ ~~ 1 Q _ ~.~ 3 ~ ~ v, ~ ~ 1 i ~11~' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Aa ~ ~ ~~i! ~~ ~ ~ ~a~~~ 111\ ~ti,,~ ~ 1 ~~ ` ,\ \ ,, ~ N 3 _~ i , ~~ I~ ~ >,, .. ~ ~ ~~1~~~~~~~~ 1I U . ~v < ~yf ~~ ~ ~ ~ ENS: T~ `~o~ GRAPHIC SCALE ~'1 V11~~~~~'1ll v\ \~~ \ -/- ~1y` ~ ~~~ ~~ niD.\1.y--~•_ _ _ I H9P \ 11E0Y X10 R. ~\ \11 1~'1'~11'1I ~ ]•ef ~, ~ ~ ~\I I ~ ~l I~~` •~ '~\ ~ ~\~J-llle(Ll ~ 19)_~-A9,R ` ~ \ ~~~C-•~'. J ~'~ t~ ~~I 1~~1~d 1 ~~ \ ~~ l J \y ~ •~~ ~ ~ ..-~ nu ~ ~ azz y / ~~ uou.o cnscur•[n tr Q ~ i~1,''1~1, 1 1 ~ T~. uC ,\ ~ ~ ~ ~-l / ~, ccoura onscuccu nv I' .TU Z \`, ~ ~1~I.11q 1 ~~ .. ` ` \ A ' ~, •~~`~. `~` , =~ ~-L" ~_99r ~ ~ SENSE i/EES / 1 \ ~^ ~ . Q' 1,\ ~ ' 11 ~`~A ~ Z \ \i ~~VVViiiil\1\~.~`~1 _~_~y tva Nsu. i,~; ~ ~~~ vvv ~ ~/J ~ '\ ~~ 1, ~ 'I ~ \\~\ ~.~~1 ~ ~•.~ .e.r, ~ `` ~~~~__ ~'~- ~iJ .~~\SE iFEES o~ ~ ~1 11 ~.1 ~ 111)5 /I 9 \ ' ~~ ~\`e~ \ 8913 ~ N ~ _ _ ~ 290 ~~~ ~~~1~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ` zm ~ ~, ~~' ~ ~ ne, ~ ~ , , ,.~,~' ~ ~~-` ~ .~ : `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,..u' i Y 0 V ,F i ~~~~~ ~ , ~ ~ nEN;t tREES ~ 3 ~ ~ I~~ ~-. v~ ~ \~~, _ }} :~.. ;~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ onr \ 1>. _ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ i ~ Z 4! ti =„~~ ~~~i ~~~9 _ s~ ~ ~ (16 ~ ~ 1 1 l 1 1 ~ l 1 ~ ~ _ ~ t , ~ ~ ~~- ~-_, ~~`o~ ~~~ .1,. n .~ ;'~ 1 Z OC 0 ~~~~~~,~~~ ~1 ~~~ ~ ~ ~ o°~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 1 ~ , Y1` ~"~;, 290 ~ N`~ ~ ~ ~ 0 d Q ~~ yyr!1 ~ `~~ ~ . , ~' ,a, ~ l v, ~ Z ~~ • 1 , t1~1 1`~1 '~ {m \ ~~canEro o~cueEn nv ~ U ~~ ` / ~ 'k ~~ ~~. ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 rie 111 m ~ . , ~ ~,ts ~ uxs 1as I F ~ ~ Q 1 ~, ~ - '~ ~, ~; x ~ ,z,:. ,1 ~\ ~ ~ ""a,,1 toy ,3 ~ ~ 1`~iS; ..~z 4~~~, ~ ~ \ 1~~'s\ : ~ ~. L W 1 ti •' 1`~1 ~ 1~ ~ ~ I 1 ~ / ~~ \\ 1 \ Y1 `1 1~V 1 1 11 ao..l`Iz ~~ 1 TENSE TREES \ 1 ` ` ' 1 ~,-~ ~s1` ~ ~ TETAL STALLS ~~~ ~ ~-s' ~- ' ~1.~ ~ ~ ~'~~ 1 ~ A,~i 1 ~>e°` ~,~° BY CLASS °°°~~~ ~.~ ~ f16tt;1Rfn R,~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~, ~I~ ~,, , ~ o I ~- 1 > \ :xi. 1 C[NS[ TR[u ~ I 11 ~ Z ~ ~ '~, ,~ ~ ,1~~~ C=C3MPACT (8,5 3R LESS> 63 STALLS ~ ~ 1~ , ~ •~ ~ ~, , ~I,,' 'I I ~ `~I F \„~w~ ~~ A, 1i~, ~ , ~ ss~- j`' U=UNISTALL (9,0' TO 8,5') 309 STALLS ~~ r ` ' ~1 '~ °'' --~ ~I I, ~ I 1 '1 ~ w ~ ~ , ~ . l ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~ I ~ ~ ti • ' ~ ~ ~ ~ S=STANDARD (9.0' ER MERE) 127 STALLS I '~~ a ~~1,fi- 111 ~ 1 ~ ~ \`1 ~ 1~ ~\ ~ 1 `I I f I 1 I /(~ - ~ GN00~~ I~ ED BY ~~ ~II~ ~ l 1 1 ~ K) I l ~ 6/ I~ ~ ~ I Y~ / ~ I J I~ES~ 1~ N a I e,a ~ I I ~ Ef ~`1 III 1~1 ~ .. _ ,~ `~ ! ~ i e,se ~i11l 11 1~;I 1~\ / 1 ~\ \ ` \ \ .~ ~,u 1 1 1 r ~ c~`,~ (\ ~ iy 1 ~\ ` \ ~ 1 11 ~ 299f l~ 1 e 1 \ ~ ~_ l/`,U1,`)\ ~ J '~ I 1 1~ ~' ~~'~~ ~~ az . ~w. 1 ~~ ~_ ~ ~ , ~ i ~,~~~~ ~a~S~S~S S~C~ ~ ~ s ry/~u I ~' ~ it ~ ~' , _ l I f ~F%Ft 1-.~ ~,u..A \~ aNUUNU cesE d~+ r„ ~ i ~, ~ ~~•~~, @,o ~\ ~~ _ ~ ~ I l l ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~' i ~ ~~ z~ / ~ wouuo oes[uREn er l~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ t 1 ~ _ nEn~ TREa ~ _ __~ , ` j~~ ~ S~'~ ~ u<nse 1NEts 1. ~2°' I` /, ~ i - ~'~~-SC ~ v. ~ l @ S -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ ~ - --_- -~~ - 1 l ~' 1.~,y,...~_ __ __ _- \ if \ ~' • ~ .nu \1 I~ b N ~ 6 Z 7 ~~ / ~~ _`~7° .-~- ~~ / • /• / T1--~_'-_ ~ ~ ~-l ~ DraMinq NumEer: ~ ~ ~ ' i %~ ~~'~ EXB-1 i,~ ;, 1 ~ 1 EXHIBITS BEGIN HERE DARREL W. LUM, DDS 20395 PACIFICA DRIYEISUITE 1 02 CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 950 1 4 DOLLY SANDOVAL, MAYOR ORRIN MAHONEY, VICE-MAYOR \ KRIS WANG GILBERT WONG MARK SANTORO RE: OAKS SHOPPING CENTERIAGENDA ITEM #27 PLEASE FIND ATTACHED SOME COMMUNITY CONCERNS REGARDING THE OAKS SHOPPING CENTER WHICH THE CITY COUNCIL IS CONSIDERING ON AUGUST 5, 2008. DARREL W. LUM, DDS ATTACHMENTS: HOTEL WITH CONFERENCE CENTER HEART OF THE CITY LANDSCAPE LEED GUIDELINES ~~ ~~C~~~~~ ~~ r AU G 4 2068 CUPERTINO CITY CLERK HOTEL WITH CONFERENCE CENTER Initially was encouraged to hear about the proposed hotel with conference center. Hotel Property Tax Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Rdds to the Oaks But disappointed that the conference center is not part of the hotel, is being built separately and at a different time, if at all. The conference center is on the top floor of a three-story building and not connected to the hotel. 6/ 17/08 City Council Members Directions on Oaks Shopping Center Project: Exhibit C-3 #8 Clarify office building and conference center proposal What type of office tenants would be attracted to this location? We expect quasi-office tenants such as medical, dental, insurances uses. MED I CRL-DENTRL 1 NCRERSES THE PRRK I NG REQUIREMENTS. How do you expect this conference center/meeting hall to operate? NO RNSWER There are conference facilities in Cupertino. See attachment. If the conference center is unsuccessful, there will be a request to convert to offices > CONFERENCE FACILITIES I N CUPERTI NO Cupertino Community Hall Number of Rooms: 1 Room seats 152 seated Cupertino Senior Center Number of Rooms: 4 Reception Room seats 200 seated 175 buffet Arts ~ Crafts Room seats 40 Classroom seats 26 Conference Room seats 10 Quinlan Community Center Number of Rooms: 3 Cupertino Room 250 People-Buffet Style 300 People-Waiter Serued Banquet Style 300 People-Theater Style Social Room 80 People Conference Room 20 People Cypress Hotel Number of Rooms: Ballroom seats 200 Salon 1, 2 and 3 seats 70 Boardroom seats 40 De Anza College Number of Rooms: 9 Seats 10-340 Flint Center for Performing Arts Number of Rooms: 1 Seats 2400 Source: Cupertino Chamber of Commerce Membership Directory ~ Business Guide Source: City of Cupertino Park Fr Recreation Department Quinlan Community Center Facility Reservation Information GIT~/ HEART OF THE LANDSCRPE Concern about the Oaks Shopping Center owner`s and the developer's reluctance to implement the Heart of the City improvements. Planning Staff Report dated May 27, 2008, page 6: HEflRT OF THE CITY SPECIFIC PLRN REQUIRES LRNDSCAPE RND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS RLONG STEUENS CREEK BOULEURRD WHEN SITE REDEVELOPMENT NCREflSES BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE BY 25% OR MORE... Planning Staff Summary dated June 17, 2008„ page 3 THE SHOPPING CENTER 0 WNER I S NOT W I LL 1 NG TO SHARE THE COST OF MPROUEMENTS RND THE RPPLCANT I S NOT W I LL I NG TO BEAR THE ENTIRE COST. THEY VIEW THE HEART OF THE CITY LflNDSCRPING RS AN "OFF-SITE" IMPROVEMENT BECAUSE THEY RRE SUBDIVIDING THE PROPERTY RND THE PORTION THEY WONT TO DEVELOP HRS LIMITED STEUENS CREEK BOULEVARD FRONTAGE. Planning Staff Summary dated June 17, 2008, page 4 THE DEVELOPMENT RDD ITI ON I S S I GN I F I CANT RND WILL I NCRERSE THE SHOPPING CENTER BUILDING SQUflRE FOOTAGE BY ABOUT 137%. Planning Staff Summary dated August 5, 2008, page 4 FLOOR RRER RATIO (FAR): Parcel Proposed FAR # 1 (Hotel ~ MiKed Use) 90% #2 (Shopping Center Remainder) 24% HEART OF THE CITY LRNDSCRPE 2 Planning Staff Summary dated May 27, 2008, page 3 The applicant PROPOSES TO ACQUIRE the subdivided hotel lot and construct the hotel in Phase 1. Planning Staff Summary dated Rugust 5,2008 ~2~~ `3 City Council Meeting on June 17, 2008 At the June 17th hearing, the applicant stated that he PLANS TO LERSE the three acres from the property owner in order to build the hotel and mixed-use building. If the parcel remains under single ownership, the nexus to require the Heart of the City Specific Plan landscape is increased. Seems to be piecemeal planning. Concern about the absence of the Oaks Shopping Center owner(s) at these meetings. Rltho it may be premature and certainly not binding, no information about the future plans for the existing shopping center. Planning Staff Summary dated Rugust 5, 2008, ~a5~.3 Applicant Comments: Doing all of the Heart of the City landscape improuements on Stevens Creek Boulevard does not make sense at this time because future redevelopment of the main shopping center buildings will cause the removal of the landscape improuements between the driveways. Perhaps now is the time to do the full Heart of the City landscape improuements along Stevens Creek Boulevard. The area for the Heart of the City landscape improuements has 40+ parking spaces. Phase 1 requires 356 parking stalls; 494 parking stalls are provided ,138+ Phase 2 requires 417 parking stalls; 470 parking stalls are provided 53+ LEED Planning Staff Summary dated June 17. 2008, page 6 The Planning Commission recommends that the applicant achieve LEED Silver certification for both buildings. 6/ 17/08 City Council Member Directions on Oaks Shopping Center Project #10 Contact the Marriott Corp. and find out their policies on sustainability for their hotel operations. Rpplicant's response: They referred us to the USGBC's LEED guide. They do not have their own program. POOR RESPONSE. RLSO DID NOT RDDRESS LEED BUILDING STRNDRRD FOR HOTEL OR OFFICE BUILDING. cc ~ 1 soon #z7 Case Details Print Close Case Number: 18100 Customer: IjgOCkl, bob ~~ external customer 21868 Monte CT Cupertino CA 95014 ma 408-725-1118 ligockis@yahoo.com status: Resolved D ~~~~~1~~7~~- ;" I CU°E~RT±~!(~ CITY CLERK Preferred Contact Method: Email Submitted By: ligocki, bob customer Topic: Clty Council>Communications (City Manager's Office) H i, For tonight's city council meeting... Location of Request: Request Type: SUggeStlOn Primary Owner: KItSOn, Rlck Date/Time Created: 08/05/2008 09:33 Date/Time Closed: 08/05/2008 10:06 BUILD A NEIGHBORHOOD, BRING THE COMMUNITY TOGETHER, WHILE GROWING TAX REVENUE. DON'T MISS YOUR BIG (AND PERHAPS LAST) OPPORTUNITY. We are STRONGLY opposed to the new plan for more housing and far less retail at the site of the Oaks shopping center. This is the last chance for many decades to build an area that brings together the community instead of isolating for the purpose of raising tax revenues. Please make a difference tonight and require any builder to make a contribution that encourages walking, community, spending ;), and is aesthetically pleasing -- the architecture in Cupertino can be so very dull -- the library is a great example. MAKE A DIFFERENCE that you can be proud and that we can all enjoy. Thank you. -- Bob & Christel Ligocki • • • Date From Text 08/05/2008 Kitson, Details » Dear Mr. Ligockis, Your concerns have been given to each 10:06 Rick councilmember. Thanks. Sincerely, Rick Kitson Office of the City Manager Internal Notes No records for internal activities found Tasks Complete Due Subject Assigned By Assigned To Status _. • Role Name Email Phone Primary Owner Kitson, Rick rickk@cupertino.org Secondary Owner Smith, Kimberly kimberlys@cupertino.org •.- No attachments found Date Event Who Description 08/05/2008 10:06 Change Status Kitson, Rick status change during send email City of Cupertino: EFMHome Case Details Print Close Case Number: 18099 customer: Anonymo p C~C~C~OdC~ AUG 5 2008 Sty I CUPERTIND Cll~at~ad-~E~i external customer Preferred Contact Method: None Resolved Page 1 of 2 Cc ~~~o~ ~d.7 Request Type: QueStlOn Submitted By: An011ymOUS Primary owner: KItSOn, RICk customer Topic: Clty Date/Time Created: 08/04/2008 Council>Communications 19:19 (City Manager's Office) Date/Time Closed: 08/04/2008 22:19 Original Request Re: The Oaks project j Due to the work schedule, we will not be able to attend tomorrow evening's meeting. But we would like to have our voice heard. We are against the high rise building. We ', ;have too many in the area already, it make the area very congested. We would like to see it limit to 2 story. We will appreciate your consideration. Yeong Tain Yeh and Bai Bee Yeh Customer Communications Date From Text 08/04/2008 Kitson, Details » Dear Yeong Tain Yeh and Bai Bee Yeh, Your 22:19 Rick comments will be given to each member of the city council. Thank you. Sincerely, Rick Kitson Office of the City Manager . _ ___ W_.__. ______. __~ ___._ _ ~ _ __ ~ __~- ----.._...._.____ ____ E Internal Activity Internal Notes Date From Note ~ 08/04/08 Kitson, Details » Kim, these comments arrived for the meeting 22:20 Rick tomorrow. Rick Tasks Complete Due Subject Assigned By Assigned To Status Case Contacts Role Name Email Phone https://clients.comcate.com/reps/caseDetail.php 8/5/2008 cc ~ls~o~ ~a~ Linda Lagergren From: Robert Garten [xonon1@comcast.netJ Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 10:05 PM To: Dolly Sandoval; Orrin Mahoney; Kris Wang; Gilbert Wong; Mark Santoro Subject: The Oaks Honorable City Council Members: I am very much opposed to the proposed development at the Oaks Shopping Center. I have been involved in opposition to past attempts to build housing at the Oaks and other developments which have not, in my opinion, made good sense for the community. Recent letters to the Courier have expressed the concerns of a number of citizens about the proposed hotel. Currently we have four hotels in Cupertino with 663 rooms and an occupancy rate of 68% in June of 2007 and probably lower now. This amounts to 212 vacant hotel rooms which is nearly twice the number proposed for the Oaks. Given these numbers why do we need more hotel rooms??? Council has argued in the past that they cannot interfere with commerce by deciding what businesses can or cannot compete. Yet the council of Los Gatos has ruled several times against business applications when they have deemed that there are already sufficient numbers of competing businesses in the city. Cupertino Council should do likewise and not approve more hotel rooms when we have more than sufficient. If a new hotel competes successfully it will mean that one of the other hotels will suffer and may eventually become another vacant building in the city. MY GREATEST CONCERN, HOWEVER, IS THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT THE OAKS IS JUST BACKDOOR STRATEGY BY THE DEVELOPER FOR EVENTUALLY CONVERTING THE HOTEL TO CONDOS. WHY ELSE WOULD THE DEVELOPER WANT ONLY 2 CONDOS AT THE SITE. I CAN IMAGINE THAT IN A YEAR OR TWO THE OWNERS OF A NEW HOTEL DEVELOPMENT WOULD RETURN TO THE COUNCIL DECLARING THAT A HOTEL IS NOT VIABLE AND THE BEST ALTERNATIVE IS TO CONVERT THE BUILDING TO CONDOS!!! I THEREFORE URGE YOU TO DENY THE APPLICATION OF SAND HILL PROPERTIES FOR THE OAKS. Thank you for your representation of the concerns of Cupertino citizens. Robert L. Garten 21344 Dexter Drive Cupertino, CA 95014 408 253 5860 I AUG 5 2008 jJ ~~ CUPERTI~JO CITY CLERK Grace Schmidt From: Steve Piasecki Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 1:55 PM To: AJScottie@aol.com Cc: City Council; David Knapp; Grace Schmidt; Kimberly Smith Subject: RE: Oaks Shopping Center Project Alice, Cc ~~~1oQ ~~ 7 AUG 4 2Q08 CUPERTINO CITY CLERK Thank you for your comments. The bulk and mass of the two proposed buildings at the Oaks is documented in the staff report in the form of their relative ratio of the total building floor area to the size of the parcel they sit on. So, the city Council has that information. I am passing along your email to the City Council so they will have your thoughts for tomorrow night. They will not be able to respond via email to avoid the appearance that they are deciding the application ahead of the public hearing but they will have your written comments. Thanks again, Steve Piasecki From: AJScottie@aol.com [mailto:AJScottie@aol.com] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 1:12 PM To: Steve Piasecki Subject: Oaks Shopping Center Project Mr. Steve Piasecki: I have written to you before about this project. At first I thought it was a good idea to have the hotel and the 3 story conference center building at the Oaks, but I have changed my mind about some of the project. I still don't mind the hotel as long as the parking on Mary Avenue is NOT disturbed. It will be back in the corner against the freeway wall. I am now very much against the 3 story conference center. 'A week or so ago, I was having lunch at the Oaks. I had walked over from the Senior Center. I stood looking over the parking lot toward the west side of the shopping center and envisioned a huge 3 story "block." This building will throw off the whole shopping center. It will be completely unbalanced. The whole west end of the shopping center will be too crowded with both the hotel and the conference center. Normally you would have a hotel and a parking lot. With this proposed underground parking garage, it just makes the whole project too massive and too dense. I understand the developer wants to make as much money as possible, but at what cost to the beauty of our city. Please consider carefully what is proposed here. This is not in the best interest of our city. Alice Ramsauer 10531 Castine Avenue Cupertino 408-738-4656 8/4/2008 C~ ~~/~~~~~~ #~~ Addendum to the 2007 Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Addressing Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions During the RTP Process Adopted by the California Transportation Commission on May 29, 2008 Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Purpose of this Addendum In January 2007, Senate President Pro Tempore Don Perata requested that the California Transportation Commission (Commission) use its current statutory authority to review its Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Guidelines in order to incorporate climate change emission reduction measures. The request also stated that RTPs should utilize models that accurately measure the benefits of land use strategies aimed at reducing vehicle trips. Commission staff established an RTP Guidelines Work Group to assist in the development of best practices for inclusion in the RTP Guidelines. The work group consisted of over 200 representatives from the Assembly and Senate, Regional Transportation Planning Agencies (RTPA), Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO), state and federal agencies/organizations, environmental interest groups, building and industry organizations, and county and city associations. At the direction of the Commission during their January 10; 2008 Commission meeting, the results of the RTP Guidelines Work Group have been included in this addendum to the RTP Guidelines. The results of the work group reflect a variety of approaches that allow MPOs and RTPAs great leeway in considering the strategy(s) that best fit their needs. Although none of the information contained within this addendum is identified in current statute, therefore not required by State (or federal) law; MPOs and RTPAs are strongly encouraged to adhere to the guidance contained in this addendum. Questions regarding the policies within this addendum should be directed to: Garth Hopkins California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning (916) 654-8175 garth. hopkins@dot.ca.gov The guidance contained within this addendum should be viewed in the overall context of the 2007 RTP Guidelines document adopted by the Commission September 2007. Federal and State Clean Air Actions The federal government currently does not have formal air quality regulations to address climate change. The issue has been politically contentious at the federal level. The United States Environmental Protection Agency is preparing draft language to include greenhouse gases in the Clean Air Act, however it is unknown when this draft language would be released. The political leadership in California has been quite active in addressing climate change issues. Greenhouse gases (GHG) have been identified as specific air pollutants that are responsible for global warming and climate change. California has focused on five GHGs (Carbon Dioxide, Methane, Nitrous Oxide, Hydro fluorocarbons, and Sulfur Hexafluoride). Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is the most prevalent GHG. All other GHGs are referenced in terms of a CO2 equivalent. The California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEPA) prepared a briefing package for Assembly Bill (AB) 1493 entitled "Global Warming and Greenhouse Emissions from Motor Vehicles"; page 14 of this document stated that, "Transportation is California's largest source of Carbon Dioxide." Governor Schwarzenegger has issued two Executive Orders regarding this issue: S-3-05 (June 1, 2005) that calls for a coordinated approach to address the detrimental air quality effects of GHGs and S-20-06 (October 18, 2006) that requires State agencies to continue their cooperation to reduce GHG and to have the Climate Action Team develop a plan by June 1, 2008, to outline a number of actions to reduce GHG. Information on California climate change activities can be found at: http://www. climatechange. ca.gov/index. htm I California Greenhouse Gas Emission Legislation • One of the most important legislative actions to address GHG was AB 32 (Nunez, 2005) known as the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 required the California Air Resources Board (ARB) to set statewide GHG emission reduction targets by adding Health and Safety Code Division 25.5, Section 38500 et seq. • Under California's Clean Air Act (Section 39000 et seq California Health and Safety Code) the ARB sets and updates air quality standards. • Senate Bill (SB) 1771 (Sher, 2000) amended Health and Safety Code Section 42800 and Public Resources Code Section 25730 to require consultation with Caltrans regarding the recording and promotion of voluntary GHG emissions reductions through the California Climate Action Registry. • AB 1493 (Pavely, 2002) added Sections 42823 and 43018.5 to the Health and Safety Code. These sections required the ARB to develop regulations designed to reduce GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles. • AB 1007 (Pavely, 2005) added Health and Safety Code Sections 43865-43867 that mandated the California Energy Commission in partnership with relevant state agencies to develop a plan to evaluate the environmental and health impacts of alternative fuel use including vehicle operations. Since 2000, the Legislature has approved several bills to ensure the reduction of GHG emissions from mobile sources. • SB 97(Dutton, 2007) charged the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) with the responsibility for preparing guidelines to mitigate GHG emissions identified through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document review process including the effects associated with transportation or energy consumption. Every RTP is subject to CEQA. SMART GROWTH/LAND USE RTP Policy Element 1. Develop investments and programs that support local jurisdictions that make land use decisions that implement regional blueprints and other smart growth strategies, including rural sustainability strategies. 2. Emphasize transportation investments in areas where desired land uses as indicated in a city or county general plan may result in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reduction or other lower impact use. Transportation Planning and Investment Strategies Consider shifting transportation investments towards improving and expanding urban and suburban core transit, programs for walkability, bicycling and other alternative modes, transit access, housing near transit, and local blueprint plans that coincide with the regional blueprint. 2 2. Provide funds and technical assistance to local agencies to develop and implement blueprint strategies. 3. Implement operational efficiencies that reduce congestion in vehicle throughput on roadways or improve transit access or other alternative access without physical expansion of the roadways. 4. For the purposes of allocating transportation investments, recognize the rural contribution towards GHG reduction for counties that have policies that support development within their cities, and protect agricultural and resource lands. Consideration should be given to jurisdictions that contribute towards these goals for projects that reduce GHG or are GHG neutral, such as safety, rehabilitation, connectivity and for alternative modes. 5. In setting priorities, consider transportation projects that increase connectivity or provide other means to reduce VMT. Pricing Strategies 1. Consider the use of alternative mode programs, congestion pricing, toll roads, and parking strategies. Examples include, but are not limited to the following: i. Road pricing and High Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes. To reduce VMT, MPOs should model adding pricing to existing lanes, not just as a means for additional expansion. Variable/congestion pricing should be considered. ii. User fees such as fuel taxes and parking charges. iii. Free or reduced fare transit fares. iv. Expansion of Parking Cash-Out Programs v. Strategies to reduce the impacts of pricing strategies on low-income individuals. 2. Consider utilizing revenues from these pricing strategies for projects, such as mass transit, that improve mobility without increasing VMT or GHG emissions. Road pricing strategies examples can be found at: "Opportunities to Improve Air Quality through Transportation Pricing Programs", U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, September 1997. http://www.epa.gov/oms/market/pricing. pdf "Sacramento Transportation & Air Quality Collaborative Final Report, Volume III: Supplemental Text for Agreements", December 2005. http://www. sacta. org/pdf/STAQC/Fi nal Reportl I I. pdf Land Use Strategies Regional land use projections that underlie RTPs have typically assumed existing growth trends will continue into the future, based on general plans. Over the last five years several MPOs have undertaken regional visioning or "blueprint" processes to look at how regions can grow more efficiently and meet more environmental and social goals. 3 1. Encourage twenty-year or longer regional housing forecasts by region, consistent with the RTP; housing need allocations that are consistent with the blueprint, and general plans to project twenty years forward in conjunction with the blueprint. 2. Encourage that the county or city general plan considers the blueprint plan for the region and links the general plan to reflect the best-case scenario. 3. Encourage that there is a reasonable basis for the projected land uses included in the RTP. 4. Encourage that land use changes contained within city and county general plans are built into land use pattern projections in the base case for modeling purposes. 5. Encourage that where there is a blueprint, the planned land use base for the regional transportation plan is consistent with that regional agency's blueprint. 6. Encourage that the land use base for the blueprint is consistent with federal regulations and current or projected local general plans. 7. MPOs should perform land use sensitivity analyses to determine whether more compact and efficient growth patterns (than the base case) would further reduce VMT. Performance Measures 1. Include a VMT measurement as part of the environmental reporting requirements, taking into account growth projections for the area. 2. Compare projected blueprint development to actual development in applicable locations and provide an explanation for variances as updated. 3. Report the progress relative to whether the project(s) identified in the local RTP are consistent with city and county general plans or the blueprint strategy for the region. TRANSPORTATION MODELING The goal of applying transportation models and analytical techniques, as part of the RTP process, is to enhance the quality of information and analysis presented to educate public decision makers and the public at large regarding the implications of various policy options, while recognizing that the final decisions on policy choices are their responsibility. 1. For preparation of the RTP required under Sections 65080 et seq. of the Government Code, by July 1, 2008, each MPO or RTPA over 200,000 in population is urged to establish transportation modeling and analytical techniques that facilitate its evaluation of one or more alternative planning scenarios under the provisions of Section 65080.3. 2. As part of the four-year RTP process each MPO or RTPA should strive to enhance, to the extent that data and resources permit, its modeling and analytical techniques in order to improve its assessment of the likely implications of key policy options. Such improvements should educate decision-makers and the public regarding how such options would potentially affect trip making, choice of travel modes, VMT, major land use development decisions, and quality of life issues. 4 3. The transport sector produces almost half of GHG in California. To evaluate the effectiveness of policies to reduce GHG, the ARB and others need to compare modeling outputs across all regions in the State. To be able to compare travel projections across regions in California, some basic recommended modeling protocols should be adopted. These should be specific to groups of regions, according to policy problems encountered. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District Offices should follow the same practices as used by the MPOs, RTPAs, Congestion Management Agencies (CMA) and Councils of Government (COG). MPOs, RTPAs, CMAs, and COGs may be grouped according to modeling needs. For each group, we define: Model features and data, possible applications of the model, and policy analysis capabilities. These recommendations are cumulative, with each set of model guidelines including the earlier ones on the list. A. Counties with very slow growth in population and jobs, little or no congestion, and no significant new road or transit construction plans (i.e., Modoc, Inyo, Siskiyou, which have 1990-2000 population growth rates below 3%) Features and data: These counties do not need to run a network travel model. Possible applications of the model: No model. Policy analysis capabilities: Road congestion is not increasing rapidly. Emission changes from higher-MPG vehicles can be factored or derived from the ARB inventory. B. Regions with attainment Air Quality (AQ), slow growth, or virtually no transit, plus the rural, isolated non-attainment areas. Features and data: These RTPAs and CMAs can run 3-step models, at least for the next few years. These models should be run to equilibrium. They should implement 4-Ds add-on models, to account for the effects of land use characteristics on travel, in the short term. See the recent Assessment of Local Models and Tools For Analyzing Smart-Growth Strategies Final Report developed by DKS Associates for Caltrans, which can be found at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/research/researchreports/reports/2007/local model tools.pdf The travel model should be documented, including all statistical goodness-of-fit measures derived from sub-model specification. The model should also be put through sensitivity tests and other validation tests, with these tests documented, and then formally peer-reviewed, also resulting in a written report. The models should address changes in regional demographic patterns. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) capabilities should be developed in these counties, leading to simple land use models in a few years. All natural resources data should be entered into the GIS. Parcel data should be developed within a few years and an existing land use data layer created. 5 Possible applications of the model: Agencies can define and evaluate trend forecast, combined general plans, preferred RTP, and low-VMT scenarios. The low-VMT scenario should achieve the regional VMT and GHG targets, if they are adopted by the ARB. Otherwise, the low-VMT scenario can simply reduce VMT substantially and increasingly over time, compared to the proposed RTP. Policv analvsis capabilities: These models can be used to evaluate increased density and mix, urban growth limits, and improved neighborhood walkability and bikeability. Performance measures can include on-road emissions of pollutants and GHG. C. Regions with rapid growth, nonattainment AQ, or the potential for significant transit use. Features and data: These regions should develop 4-step travel models as soon as is possible. In the near-term, 4-Ds add-on models should be used. Simple land use models should be used, such as GIS rule-based ones, in the short term. Economic, market-based land use models should be developed within a few years. A simple freight model should be used. Several employment types should be used, along with several trip purposes. Time periods should include peak and off-peak. The travel model set should be run to full equilibration across all model steps. All road capacities and speeds should be validated with surveys. The urban development footprint in GIS should be used to calculate environmental impacts on terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. The travel model and land use model should be documented and tested, as above. Parcel data and an existing urban layer should be developed as soon as is possible. A digital general plan layer also needs to be developed in the short-term. Possible applications of the model: More policy scenarios can be run. The same policies as in B could be run, plus one or more transit improvement proposals, as well as demand management and pricing strategies. Policv analvsis capabilities: In addition to the policies and performance measures in 8, these agencies can evaluate policies for their effects on lower-income households, as required by Federal and State law. This can be done by evaluating traveler welfare measures based on the mode choice log sums for each household income class, or based on travel costs for them. In addition, these agencies can evaluate simple road pricing, parking charges, and higher fuel taxes or carbon taxes in the plan, or in the Government Code Section 65080.3 alternative. D. Regions with serious or worse ozone or CO non-attainment. Features and data: These agencies should achieve the requirements of the Federal AQ Conformity Rule, meaning 4-step models with full feedback across travel model steps and some sort of land use modeling. In addition to the conformity. requirements, they should also add an auto ownership step and make this step and the mode choice equations for transit and walk and bike and the trip generation step sensitive to land use variables. Walk and bike modes should be explicitly represented. They should implement simple land use models for the next RTP and develop formal, economic land use models in the next few years. Freight models should be implemented in the short term and commodity flows models within a few years. Simple Environmental Justice analyses should be done using travel costs or mode choice log sums, as in C. Four or five time periods should be modeled. Agencies should develop and test joint mode-destination choice models. Small Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) should be used, 6 to increase sensitivity to densification near to rail stations and in Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) corridors. These regions should monitor the large RTPAs and MPOs, in E below, as they develop tour-based travel models and activity-based travel models. The next household travel survey should include activities and tours. Floor space rent data should be collected. Parking quantity and cost should be represented in the travel model. The carpool mode should be included, along with access-to-transit sub modes. Speed post-processing should be used and take into account the effects of corridor capacity continuity and bottlenecks on congested speeds and emissions. Possible applications of the model: Five-step models permit the agencies to design and evaluate more land use policies, such as in D, plus complex combinations of transit, land use, and pricing policies. Policv analvsis capabilities: A full range in performance and impact measures could be developed, for economic, environmental, and equity effects, as required by SAFETEA-LU, National Environmental Policy Act, CEQA, and other laws. Traveler welfare could be measured and, if possible, locator welfare. Various measures of economic development could also be created, such as wages, jobs, production, and exports. E. The largest four MPOs and other COGs and RTPAs with rapid growth and established transit systems. Features and data: These regions should develop tour-based travel models in the short term and activity-based travel models within a few years. They should also build formal microeconomic land use models, as soon as is practical, so that they can be used to evaluate economic welfare (utility) and economic development (wages, jobs, exports). Commodity flows models should be developed, with truck and van tours, in a few years. The next household travel survey should include activities and tours. Geocoded employment data with occupational code should be purchased for two or more past years. Floor space quantity and rent data should be gathered. Freight data also should be collected. Full sample enumeration of households in the travel model and land use model should be studied and implemented in a few years, if feasible. Households should be geocoded to location. Stated preference surveys of households and firms should be performed, as necessary, for use in location choice models. Microsimulation of households and firms should be investigated and developed, if feasible. Possible applications of the model: The effects of transportation policies and land use policies interact with feedbacks in an integrated model set and so projections will be more accurate. With amarket-based land use model, the agency can evaluate land- pricing policies, such as infill subsidies. Policv analvsis capabilities: Economic measures from the land use model could be implemented. These measures are more complete than those from the travel model and include locator welfare, wages, and exports. Equity analysis could include change in welfare by household income class. Water quality, housing affordability, and fire hazard analysis are examples of the measures that such model sets can also produce. These microsimulation land use models can evaluate the energy use and GHGs produced by households and workers in building space. Economic development impacts may be comprehensively evaluated with this model set. Time- of-day road tolls can be evaluated. 7 The following recommendations for quality control through model consistency and peer review are essential in creating confidence in modeling results. These process recommendations should be implemented by all agencies as soon as is possible. Consistency of RTP Modeling For modeling groups C, D, and E, the No Action alternative and the Proposed Plan alternative in an RTP should be modeled consistently. This means both should be done using the same land use model and the same travel model. The inputs for the models, including alternative land use policies; will be different, of course. This practice will reduce the arbitrariness of zonal projections for households and employment in travel models. This practice also should apply to Environmental Impact Reports (EIR)/Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) studies. The same land use model used in the RTP modeling should be used in the impact assessment for the No Action alternative, the Proposed Plan alternative, and the Environmentally Preferable Alternative. Only in this way, will all of the outputs in the RTP and EIR be comparable. An alternative-planning scenario under Government Code Section 65080.3 should also be evaluated with the same models. County and corridor studies performed by Caltrans districts and by county agencies may use more-detailed networks and zones than the MPO uses, but the models should be otherwise consistent, structurally and in operation, with the MPO model. Peer Review and Model Testing All travel and land use models should be fully documented, with the documents on the web. They should also be validated and tested for sensitivity to changes in inputs,' parameter values, and policies. Agencies should have an on-going model improvement program to increase model accuracy and policy sensitivity. All substantial model changes should be subjected to peer review and written up. The four largest MPOs should use the Travel Model Improvement Program (TMIP) national peer review process, but include two California modelers, for their understanding of California laws. Other agencies should set up reviews using California modelers. The California Inter-Agency (CIA) Forum or other body of California modelers may develop validation guidelines. Also, these bodies could develop guidelines for which types of VMT should be reduced in GHG-reduction scenarios and alternatives. 4. The RTP analyses should provide to decision-makers and the public: a. A clear explanation of the modeling and analytical techniques applied in assessing the implications of the "likely" land use scenario, and any land use and other alternatives studied; b. Reasonable transparency to that modeling and analytical process; c. An understanding of the sensitivity of the forecast results to various policy assumptions; for example, where feasible offering estimates of the elasticities and cross elasticities of demand for various modes of travel with respect to critical variables such as access time, travel time, reliability, safety, privacy, and cost; d. The degree to which analytical results can be expected to: Be more indicative of a general expected trend or order of magnitude change rather than a quantifiably valid forecast; ii. Provide the degree of certainty needed for the quantifiable forecasts; and 8 e. Any insights gained through market-based research into the variables that most influence consumer choices with respect to housing in transit oriented and mixed-use developments, the use of transit services, and decision to use single occupant vehicles. The following are suggested references: "Assessment of Integrated Transportation/ Land Use Models", Robert Johnston and Mike McCoy, UC Davis for Caltrans, May 2006. http://www. ice. ucdavis. edu/um/ "Assessment of Local Models and Tools for Analyzing Smart-Growth Strategies," DKS Associates, with UC Irvine and UC Santa Barbara, for Caltrans, July 2007. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/research/researchreports/reports/2007/local model tools.pdf "Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes, Interim Handbook," TCRP Web Document 12 (Project B-12), March 2000. "Metropolitan Travel Forecasting: Current Practice and Future Direction" Transportation Research Board, Special Report 288. Robert A. Johnston, "Review of U.S. and European Regional Modeling Studies of Policies Intended to Reduce Transportation Greenhouse Gas Emissions" July 30, 2007. On the VTPI web site and available from the author at UC Davis. 9 c c ,~ls~o n ~~ ~ II r ~ I `.5~7 ~Ci ` ~..~ ~ - I ~ 2003 '._J -. ~.~l_ Intelligent Parking Free Market, Best Technology Plan to Make Parking Costs Visible and Optional to All Michael Bullock mike_bullock@earthlink. net 1800 Bayberry Drive Oceanside, CA 92054 760-754-8025 August 2, 2008 Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 1 August 2, 2008 1.0 Preface Intelligent urban planning reduces the need for parking and the total miles that are driven. It does this by having the following four characteristics: 1.) It clusters development around good transit stations or transit stops. 2.) It makes it safe and easy to use non-motorized modes of travel. 3.) It has a local balance between development that uses mostly night-time parking and development that uses mostly day-time parking. This balance should be no worse than 60%-40%. 4.) Parking is placed to support the sharing of parking. However, intelligent urban planning will fall far short of minimizing the need for parking or minimizing the miles that are driven unless the following operational characteristics are adopted: 1.) Nearly all parking is shared. This means that it is almost always the case that anyone can park anywhere. 2.) Parking is operated so that the potential users of parking can escape the expense of parking by choosing to not use the parking. This characteristic is named "unbundled" to note that the cost of parking is unbundled from other costs. 3.) Parking is priced and marketed to reduce the need to drive around looking for parking. It is priced to ensure availability. The Intelligent Parking technology that accomplishes the above three operational characteristics also does the following. 4.) Parking at any desired price is made as easy as possible, for most users. 5.) Records of the use of each parking space are kept. This will facilitate decisions to either add or subtract parking spaces. This plan describes how the unbundling is accomplished. It describes both the hardware and software needed. New understandings about energy and the environment will cause more people and companies to seek out cities that have embraced both sustainability and old-fashioned values of fairness and economic choice, implemented with the latest technology. With the implementation of Intelligent Parking, cities can become more compact, functional, and successful. Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 2 August 2, 2008 2.0 Need for and Availability of Intelligent Parking Development Costs Intelligent Parking has not been implemented in any city or development. However, San Francisco is getting close. Their work is described in a July 12th article in the NYT by John Markoff, "Can't Find a Parking Spot? Check Smartphone" Despite San Francisco's progress, the implementation of Intelligent Parking will require paying for development costs. Both hardware and software development is needed. New Parking Inc, founded by Thomas Janacek (tjanacek(a)new- parkinq.com), has the capability to provide some of the features of Intelligent Parking. However, its system requires users to call in on their cell phones when they park and when they leave. Streetline Industries makes the street sensors that transmit single space occupancy information into Wi Fi systems. However, these sensors only detect the presence of a car, without the capability of recognizing an RFID. New Parking Inc, Streetline Industries and other parking-innovation companies will need to be contacted to see if they will submit a bid to develop and supply the hardware and software needed for Intelligent Parking. Thankfully, the money to develop Intelligent Parking will be readily available to any city. This is true because parking is so expensive to supply and the primary features of Intelligent Parking (shared and unbundled) will allow less parking to be built. As an Oceanside-specific example, the following information leading to funding is provided. "City Mark" is a developer of downtown property. Recently, a City Mark development was approved in downtown Oceanside. It is a mixed-use development that includes parking supplied at numerical levels that were computed without reductions for the unbundling of parking costs. Table 7 (shown below) shows that when users are given the choice of getting cash for not parking (the Intelligent Parking method of unbundling), over 20% will accept the cash and not drive. City Mark is building 904 parking spaces. This means that if they did Intelligent Parking, there would be (20%) * 904 = 181 parking spaces that can be used by non-City Mark users. The City Mark project will destroy 172 current, surface-parking spaces. The Coastal Commission therefore required that Oceanside and City Mark agree to supply 172 spaces to make up for the lost spaces. Oceanside plans to provide the land; City Mark has agreed to construct the surface parking. This new, surface-parking lot will be built on land that is west of the Oceanside railroad line, north of Wisconsin Avenue, and on land that is within easy walking distance from Oceanside's major transit hub. This land is very valuable. Since it takes 1 acre of land to park 120 cars, the 172 spaces will require 172/120 = 1.43 acres of land. Since Intelligent Parking will eliminate the need for this parking lot (181 is greater than 172), the 1.42 acres can be sold by Oceanside, for millions of dollars. This may be more money than what would be required to both develop and implement Intelligent Parking. Since Oceanside would be funding the development of the hardware and software needed to implement Intelligent Parking, the City should attempt to retain all or part of the patents and/or ownership rights to these advancements. In that way, it is possible that the other cities that implement Intelligent Parking will need to pay Oceanside for the right to use some of the key Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 3 August 2, 2008 features of Intelligent Parking. Oceanside might therefore get its money back many times over. In any case, it would be better for Oceanside to not have to use 1.43 acres of land close to its core downtown area to park 172 cars. For example, the 1.43 acres could instead be used for up to (45 units per acre) * 1.43 acres = 64 condominiums or apartments. 3.0 How much parking? The goal is to have only marginally more parking than what is needed. Not having too much parking will minimize the "dead space" effect of parking. It will also minimize the economic burden of parking. This means that there will be less parking supplied than what has been required under the existing suburban ordinances. These ordinances often require enough parking to park one car for every potential driver. These ordinances also required enough parking to park all of these cars simultaneously, ignoring any possibility of sharing parking between different uses. This amount of parking is substantially more than is needed in a mixed-use downtown with above-average transit. However, the existing suburban ordinances supply a valuable, baseline amount of parking. This amount will be conservatively reduced so as to not discourage drivers from using downtown. Proximity of transit, proximity of mixed uses, sharing, and the unbundling of parking cost will each be conservatively used to compute appropriate reductions. It is expected that decision makers will be overly conservative in applying these reductions. If true, then this approach requires redeveloping excess parking into something else, when it is clear that there is too much parking. There is not enough parking when the amount of revenue generated by the parking exceeds what is a reasonable rate of return on the value of the parking. The revenue will be driven up by a shortage because with Intelligent Parking, the price is adjusted in real time to keep the vacancy rate from dropping below 15%. If there is a reasonable rate of return on the value of the parking, then the parking is correctly sized. A redevelopment example would be to convert a condominium parking space into an enclosed room that could be leased for storage or some other purpose. As another example, a corner of a ground-level parking garage could be converted into a coffee shop. 4.0 Specific Features of Intelligent Parking with Rationale 8~ Implementation Details 4.1 Feature 1: Technology will make paying easy for most drivers. Please see http://www.sparkparking.com/howitworks.html and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FasTrak. For credit-worthy drivers that are willing to ID their car, pay parking will not require any actions other than parking. Paying for all parking fees over a month is then done in response to a monthly billing statement. Parking will feel to the consumer like a service provided by a municipality, such as water, energy, or garbage. One important difference is that users belonging to a "beneficiary group" will get an earnings amount in their monthly statement. Those that earn more than what they -are charged will receive a check for the difference. This ease of use will make driving to downtown astress-free experience. Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 4 August 2, 2008 4.2 Feature 2: Having shared parking, to support mixed uses. Shared parking for mixed uses means that less parking is needed. Also, since very little parking will be off limits to anyone, drivers will be more likely to park one time per downtown visit, even though they would often make use of several downtown locations. This means more pedestrian activity, adding to the attractions offered in downtown. Parking is to be generally shared with all downtown drivers. If there is an exception, the reserved nature of the parking is for specific hours and signs will alert drivers of these hours. 4.3 Feature 3: Unbundling the cost of parking in a way that usually supports the sharing of parking. To the extent possible, the cost of car parking is unbundled from non-parking costs. This is done by charging for parking but giving all the revenue to all those that fall into the following types of "beneficiary groups". 1.) Those that have already paid for the capital cost of parking. An example of this type of beneficiary group would be the owners of condominiums, where parking has been built and the cost is included in the price of the condominium. Note that although they have technically already paid for the parking, if they borrowed money to pay for some portion of the price, the cost is built into their monthly payment. This illustrates why the value of parking and the cost of borrowing money (rate of return on money) are the correct parameters to use to compute the appropriate base, hourly charge for parking. 2.) Those that are incurring on-going costs of parking. An example of this type of beneficiary group is a set of office workers, where the cost of the parking is contained in either the building lease or the cost of the building. Either way, the parking costs are reducing the wages that can be paid to the employees. Such parking is often said to be "for the benefit of the employees". Defining this beneficiary group will ensure that the statement is strictly true, instead of the common situation where the employees benefit only in proportion to their use of the parking. 3.) Those that are purchasing or renting something and the cost of the parking is built into the price. Examples of this beneficiary group are people that rent hotel rooms, rent an apartment, buy items, or dine in establishments that are paying for parking. This is often the case, but it is not necessarily true. The cost and revenue of the parking built with hotel rooms, apartments, retail, or restaurants could be separated out so that the patrons are not paying for parking (unless they park). If this is the case, then the only beneficiary groups are the owners of the parking. However, if unbundling is accomplished in this way, it must be made public so everyone can see that the parking is not being subsidized by the patrons. 4.) Those that are said to benefit from parking, even though the money has been supplied by some source of money that is in no way dependent on those that are said to benefit. An example of this group would be train riders that depart from a station that has parking that is said to be "for riders". In order that all riders from the station benefit equally from the parking, they will pay the normal fare, minus an earnings amount from the parking. This will have the effect of optimizing the use of the parking. Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 5 August 2, 2008 Those riders that really need the parking will always find parking. Those that could, with little inconvenience, get to the station without driving, will do so, to avoid the charge. Sharing will no longer be prohibited because anyone that parks will be benefiting riders by contributing to their earnings. 5.) Those that are understood by tradition to be the beneficiaries of on-street parking. Owners ofsingle-family homes are the beneficiaries of the parking that is along the boundaries of their property. They will get 100% of the earnings generated by such parking. All other land owners will split the earnings of such on-street parking with the city. Note that pricing is described in Features 4 and 5, below; Feature 6 gives more details about how groups benefit. Note again that unbundling results in substantially less car trips and less car ownership. Unbundling for a condominium means that although the parking will add to the initial cost, an assigned amount of parking will earn money for the owners. Unbundling for a condominium could also mean that an owner can choose to have control over a single or several parking places. Such parking spaces will be equipped with a red light and a green light. If the red light is lit, this will mean that the space is not available for parking, except for the person who is controlling the spot. If the green light is lit it will mean that the space is available to anyone. A space that is being reserved with a red light is charged at the full price to the condominium owner that has control over the space. The owner that controls these spaces can change the state of the parking space (available or not available) by either a phone call, on line, or at any pay station. After condominium owners experience the cost of reserving a space for themselves, they might give up on the idea of having their own personal, unshared parking space. Especially since Intelligent Parking will give most owners all the flexibility they need in terms of parking their cars and their guest's cars. People often think that condominium parking should be gated, for security reasons. However, parking within parking garages needs to be patrolled at the same frequency level as on-street parking, which is enough to make crime around either types of parking very rare. Cameras can help make parking garages that are open to the public the absolute last place for criminal activity. We should not need gated communities in our downtown areas. For renters, unbundling means that "rent" (traditional rent minus earnings) is reduced by the money earned by charging for the number of parking spaces allocated to them. For employees, it means that "wages" (now a sum of traditional wage and parking lot earnings) are no longer reduced to provide parking. Companies will probably want the option of offering "free parking" to their employees so as to be able to compete with traditional job sites. However, employees that request no "free parking" should be appropriately rewarded since employees that don't drive to work are, on average, just as valuable as employees that do drive to work. Companies should not be required to Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 6 August 2, 2008 lease parking for their employees. Providing "free parking" under the conditions of this report really means giving employees that drive every single day an "Add-In" amount of pay so that the sum of the Add-In and the earnings equals their charge, for any given monthly statement .The city (or other operator of the parking), which sends out statements, can add in the "Add In" amount, per the company's instructions. The company will then be billed for these amounts. Note that this is a choice for the company so that the company can provide "free" parking. Note also that there would be no requirement for the company to provide any such "add-in" amount to the employees that don't drive every day. The net result is that the company will be treating drivers better than non-drivers. However, this economic discrimination will be substantially less than the status quo economic discrimination, where drivers get parking and non-drivers get nothing. Finally, it means that the cost of goods and services (traditional price minus earnings) are increased less to provide parking. 4.4 Feature 4: For occupancy rates that do not threaten to go higher than desired, prices are computed from the value of the parking and an agreed-upon rate of return. Parking-garage or parking-lot parking is priced so that even if demand does not threaten to fill the parking beyond 85% (the amount that equates to just over one space vacant per city block), the money generated will equate to an agree-upon return on the parking value. An example is shown in Table 1. This accomplishes the goal of unbundling the cost of parking from other costs and the goal of less car trips and less car ownership by providing a true economic choice. The value of on-street parking is controversial to compute. Therefore, the following, somewhat arbitrary approach to the pricing of on-street parking is offered. On-street parking that has an occupancy that is less than 50% is free. However, after it is 50% full, it is priced at 50 cents per hour. As the occupancy increases beyond 70%, price is increased as shown in Table 2 below. 4.5 Feature 5: Price is increased to guarantees availability. The hourly rate price of parking is dynamically set on each city block or on a block of off-street parking, to one that nearly always prevents the occupancy rate from exceeding 85%. An 85% occupancy rate (15% vacancy) is the amount that results in just over one space vacant per city block. Tables 2 and 3 show how this can be done. This feature will reduce driving around to look for parking. If price is not a concern, a user can simply go to the most desirable block for their visit. This feature will almost always guarantee at least one vacant spot on every block. Parking garage spaces are grouped into effective blocks. These blocks are considered to be nearly equal in desirability. This feature is referred to as "Protected Vacancy Pricing". It is similar to "congestion pricing" that could be implemented on PAYD (pay as you drive) highway lanes. "Congestion Pricing" really means "congestion-prevention pricing" since its implementation works to prevent the likelihood of congestion. Similarly, "Protected Vacancy Pricing" prevents vacancy from dropping too low. Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 7 August 2, 2008 4.6 Feature 6: Traditional groups benefit. Parking beneficiaries are identified to encourage developments to provide enough parking and to support traditional ideas about who should benefit from allocations of parking. Beneficiaries are paid the revenue that has been generated by the parking spaces allocated to them. This will offset any parking costs they might incur. This "pay but benefit" approach is the primary method of unbundling. This will reduce the political difficulties of adopting pay parking in a democracy where the high cost of parking is often hidden and rarely discussed or understood. The revenue from on-street parking in front of apartments or businesses will be split between the city and the business owners. The revenue from on-street parking in front of single family homes will be given to the home owners. Note that "revenue" means the amount after collection costs are subtracted. e 4.7 Feature 7: Technology will help drivers find parking. Technology will be used to help drivers select the best possible parking space for their situation. Any time occupancy rates are high or there are reasons that it might be high, users will be encouraged to go to a website that will give current and predicted hourly rates for all locations. The website will also direct a user to a given block of parking if the user gives the visit location or locations, the time and date, and the hourly rate they wish to pay. This will make driving to downtown easier. It will also reduce driving around looking for parking. The hourly rate of parking will be available at an "on line" web site, at a phone number, and at Pay Stations. The "base-price" (before occupancy-rate- driven increases), hourly rate, for any section of parking garage or any city block will be stable and shown on signs. However, since Feature 5 requires that price be increased when occupancy on a block (or garage section) gets high, many users will want to be able to see the hourly rate before they chose parking. This should be made as easy as possible to reduce driving around to get acceptable parking. Parking garage entrances will have large video screens showing both predicted and existing availability and price. 4.8 Feature 8: Pay stations will help all users. To be inclusive, Pay Stations will support drivers with poor credit or drivers with concerns about the potential loss of privacy inherent in getting billed for all parking. Pay Stations will take payments from users that do not want to ID their car (or can't due to a poor credit rating) or do not want a specific parking charge to appear on a monthly bill. Pay station transactions start with the user typing in the parking spot where they have parked their car. Such users could pay with cash or credit card. They will pay enough to cover their time to be parked. If they stay less time than they paid for, they can go back to the pay station and get change. If they stay longer, they can extend their time with a phone call, if they have a credit card. This method of parking is less convenient but will equate to the experience in many cities (Berkeley, for example), where a driver parks and then must visit a Pay Station at least once. These features make the system inclusive to all. 4.9 Feature 9: Getting a Car ID will be easy. Pay stations will dispense car ID units (which will cost less than $5), so that someone visiting downtown Oceanside for the first time will only be inconvenienced once, with a need to go to a pay station after parking. The easiest way to get an ID unit will be to swipe a credit or debit card, Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 8 August 2, 2008 providing billing information. If a user does not have a credit card or does not want to use a credit or debit card, they can type in their name and billing address and hope that the resulting credit check supports getting a car ID. If not, they will need to pay at the Pay Station each time they park. Giving pay stations the capability to dispense a car ID unit will make driving to downtown (after the first time) astress-free experience for credit-worthy citizens. 4.10 Feature 10: Accommodating Handicapped Drivers ID numbers of handicapped drivers will allow these drivers to park free or at greatly reduced prices, at most locations. Data will be kept to allow for integrating this need into the pricing equations. These records will show where these drivers go most often. Specially designated spots may or may not be required. The handicapped allocations can be modified as needed. 4.11 Feature 11: Good reporting will support good decision making. The computer that controls all parking transactions will provide reports showing where additional parking would be a good investment and where it would be wise to convert existing parking to some other use. When new parking is to be built, individual investor money can be used. These individual investors will be drawn by the fact that adjacent parking is in short supply, earning exceptional returns, due to Feature 5. 4.12 Feature 12: Privacy rules and safeguards will be used so that with very few exceptions the information about who is parking where is never released except to the car owner that gets the monthly statement. 5.0 Further Discussion of Unbundling, Which Will Lead to Less Car Use and Less Car Ownership: Unbundling is a key feature of this parking plan. It is also a crucial application of the free market principle that people should only pay for what they use. Whether people are shoppers, residents, or employees, they deserve the choice of saving themselves the cost of parking, if they would rather not use the parking. Business should not be conducted in a way that, in effect, assumes that everyone wants to drive and own cars at some average rate. It is not true that no one minds having their rent or home- ownership costs increased, the cost of their purchases increased, or their wage decreased, to pay for parking. Most Americans agree that the free market should be our baseline approach to how business is conducted. Individuals should have a broad range of economic choices. If a condominium owner wants to use 5 parking spaces, so be it. If another condominium owner wants to use no parking spaces, so be it. If a renter wants to rent a lot of parking or no parking at all, those choices need to be available. Shoppers and shop owners should also be given new choices regarding parking, to reduce the amount of parking cost that is hidden within the cost of goods and services. Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 9 August 2, 2008 More specifically for a given development, parking cost should be unbundled from the cost of everything else offered at the development. This will result in less car ownership and less car use at the development compared to the level if parking costs were built in to the cost of what is offered at the development. The excess parking that might result from the unbundling should be offered to the general public, at a price that provides a reasonable rate of return on the cost to build the parking. If there is insufficient demand for the excess parking, it should be used or redeveloped in some non-parking way to make as much money as possible. The view is taken that the parking or its replacement, if it is not sufficiently needed, should benefit traditional groups that own or are otherwise economically linked to the development. The unbundling is accomplished by issuing a monthly statement to all the members of the traditional groups. These statements will potentially show both a charge for parking and a parking lot benefit payment. Employers, if they choose, can add in an amount so that their employees that drive every day will break even, as described in Feature 3. Besides providing basic fairness, relative to the unfortunate status-quo way of handling parking, unbundling parking will favor transit, walking (living close), biking, car pooling, etc. It will also favor owning fewer cars. In other words, unbundling will reduce car ownership and car trips. These methods will help any city attract the best employers, who would like their employees to get extra money if they don't drive, since this will be done at very little cost to the company. It will attract the best condominium owners, who will appreciate the range of choices not offered in other cities. It will help our transit systems be successful. The world will know that cites that implement Intelligent Parking are ready for the best development and the best companies. Because over utilization of cars is at the heart of our environmental and economic problems, cites that implement Intelligent Parking will be recognized as the "greenest" and "smartest" cities in America. With air pollution, 42 thousand yearly roadway fatalities, peak oil, obesity, urban sprawl, air pollution, congestion, and climate change, this is a patriotic and moral, as well as an economic-fairness issue. Each gallon of gasoline burned results in 20 pounds of C02. From the Deputy Attorney General Sandy Goldberg's letter of January 8, 2008, to the City of Petaluma: According to NASA's James Hansen, proceeding at the emissions rate of the past decade will result in "disastrous effects, including increasingly rapid sea level rise, and increased frequency of droughts. Also: Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 10 August 2, 2008 The need to make substantial cuts in emissions drives the global targets embodied in the Kyoto Protocol and the State's tazgets established by Governor Schwazzenegger's Executive Order .S-3-O5, and AB 32, California's Global Warming Solution Act of 2006. In California, by these authorities, we aze committed to reducing emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, and 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. Achieving the 2020 tazget will require California to reduce emissions by 29% below projected levels. In short, our past and current GHG emissions have pushed us to a climatic "tipping point." If we continue our business-as-usual emissions trajectory, dangerous climate change will become unavoidable. The recent Bali accord recognized that we must cut greenhouse gas emissions from 25 to 40% below 19901evels by 2020 to avoid the most catastrophic impacts of climate change, which is even more aggressive than the reductions required in California under AB 32. And, the experts tell us, we have very little time to take decisive action. Rajendra Pachauri, Chairman of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ("IPCC") recently declazed: "If there's no action before 2012, that's too late. What we do in the next two to three yeazs will determine our future. This is the defining moment." Tables 6 and 7 show that if employees are offered the choice of earning money by not driving, they will drive substantially less. Table 6 shows that bus ridership increased by 1600%. If many adjacent employers adopted Intelligent Parking, transit service providers would need less subsidy and be motivated to increase transit service frequency. 6.0 Implementation Details, Variable Definitions, Sample Calculations 6.1 Development Parking (DP) Development Parking is all of the parking built within a development or set of developments. This does not include the on-street parking that is adjoining or across the street from the development or set of developments. Any parking that is privately owned by individuals, within the development, would have to be excluded from this set of parking. (If the owners of such privately owned parking wanted, their parking could be offered for rent at the same price as the Development Parking (DP), with the money raised going to the private owner.) It is hoped that such privately owned parking is minimized. Development Parking (DP) is owned jointly according to the rules of the development or set of developments. It is operated in accordance with this plan. Often but not always, developments could be mixed use. Different developments can have their parking put into a single DP if the cost of the parking is the similar and the locations are adjacent. 6.2 Number of Parking Spaces in the DP (N DP) This is the number of parking spaces in the Development Parking (DP). 6.3 Beneficiary Group (BG) This is a defined set of potential Development Parking (DP) users. They are closely associated with the development. For Bullock DraftOfPazkingPlan 11 August 2, 2008 example, if the development has condominiums and offices, one BG would be the condominium owners and another BG would be the workers. All those living in a single condominium constitute one unit of the condominium BG. Hotel guests are another example of a Beneficiary Group (BG). It is possible for a user to be in more than one group. For example, an individual could own a condominium (or live in a condominium) and work at the development and therefore be a member of both BGs. Beneficiary Groups (BGs) are sets of people that are grouped and assigned parking places that will earn money for these people. These groups are those that might have had the privilege of using the parking for free if there was no unbundling. Therefore, according to traditional views, these are the people that should benefit from the parking. Most Beneficiary Groups (BGs) are associated with a Development Parking (DP). However there is one additional set of units (households) that are BGs. They are the households of single family homes that have on-street parking adjacent to their properties. They will benefit economically from the use of that on-street parking. Therefore, asingle-family resident is handled like a development. Its on-street parking is its Development Parking (DP). The household is a Beneficiary Group (BG) with a single element. Criteria will be defined which determine when a single family's on-street parking is brought into the parking plan. It is done either at the family's request or when the impact of adjacent, charged parking is sufficient so it is unfair to the family to suffer the intrusion of parked cars with no economic benefit. Every Development Parking (DP) has the potential for users that are from no BG associated with the development or set of developments. They are referred to as members of the general public. Since unbundling parking reduces parking demand, there will often be parking available to the general public. If so, this will be a good thing because the revenue from these "outsiders" (the general public) plays a vital role in keeping the net parking cost (charge minus earnings) close to zero for members of the Beneficiary Group (BG) that park close to the maximum time possible. Finally, it may be desirable to sell parking spaces to condominium owners. This should be very expensive so as to be unlikely because parking spaces sold are removed from the pool of Development Parking (DP), violating the goal of shared parking. Sold parking spots will only be shared at the whim of the owner. If the owner wants to share their spot or spots with others, this can be done so as to generate payments to the owner. Since the parking is to be priced to guarantee vacant parking, the only advantage to the owner, of having privately owned parking is to be able to always use the same spot. Since this is a small advantage, few if any condominium owners will want to buy any parking. 6.4 Number of Units in the Beneficiary Group (N BG) This is the number of units in the BG. 6.5 Fraction Built (FB) This is N FB (amount of parking built) divided by the amount of parking that would have been required for the Development Parking Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 12 August 2, 2008 (DP) under the traditional parking ordinance. For example, if Development Parking (DP) is build for 100 condominiums and 30,000 square feet of office space, the traditional amount of parking required might be two per condominium and 4 for every one-thousand square feet of office space, for a total of 2*100 + 4*30 = 320 spaces. If the Number of Parking Spaces in the DP (N DP) happened to be 250, then the FB for the development would be 250/320. 6.6 BG Parking (BGP) This is the parking assigned (allocated) to benefit a Beneficiary Group (BG). They are not specific parking places. Rather, they are some portion of the DP. 6.7 Number of Parking Spaces in a BGP (N BGP) This is the number of parking spaces assigned to a Beneficiary Group (BG). N_UGP is computed by multiplying the amount of parking required by the traditional off-street parking ordinance by the development Fraction Built (FB). For the FB example above, the Number of Parking Spaces in a BGP (N BGP) for the condominium owners Beneficiary Group (BG) would be 2*100 * (250/320) = 156.25 parking spaces. 6.8 Parking Cost (PC) This is the cost to provide the parking. If parking is underground or otherwise built into the overall building, then it is the difference between the cost of the building with the parking minus the estimated cost of the building if no parking were built. If the parking increased the amount of land needed to build the development, then the cost of the additional land is added to the construction cost to compute the Parking Cost (PC). The cost of surface parking is the cost of the land plus the cost of the construction (surface, striping, metering, landscaping, lighting and any other similar cost). The cost of on-street parking is only the cost of striping and metering the parking plus the cost of required signs. For the purpose of supporting the example calculations to follow, it is assumed that the 250 assumed number of spaces cost $40,000 each for a total cost of $10 M (10 million dollars). 6.9 Return on Investment (Rn This is an agreed-upon number which is used in the calculation of base parking price. It is the percent return on the capital cost of parking. For example, it may be agreed upon that 6% is the Retum on Investment (Rn to be used in the calculations of the price to be charged for parking. 6.10 Percent Full (PF) This is the estimated yearly average of the occupancy rate of the Development Parking (DP). For example if the actual, time averaged, occupancy rate of a Development Parking (DP) is .7 (It is, on average, 70% full), then the Percent Full (PF), which is an estimate, should be close to .7. The Percent Full (PF) is given an initial estimate. That estimate is then continually updated by the computer which keeps hourly records of Development Parking (DP) population. Therefore, after a sufficient time has past, this estimate will have sufficient accuracy to support its use in the calculation of price. As conditions change, the true value and the estimated value of PF will both change. However, Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 13 August 2, 2008 the estimated value should track the true value with enough accuracy to make it reasonable to use this estimate (PF) in the calculation of parking price. 6.11 Hourly Rate (HR) This is the hourly rate charged to park. To conform with Feature 5 it will be computed so as to increase during times of high demand. 6.12 Full Cost Pricing (FCP) This is a method of computing the Hourly Rate (HR) so that the Return on Investment (Rn is realized given the Parking Cost (PC), even if there is no reason to raise the rate to limit use. As an example, if the Parking Cost (PC) of a Development Parking (DP) is $10 M, meaning that the cost of an individual parking space is PC/N DP = $10M/250 = $40,000, the Return on Investment (Rn is 6%, and there is no need to raise the rate to limit usage, then the rate per hour is set to earn .06 * $10M/250 = $2,400 per year, from each spot in the Development Parking (DP). If the Percent Full (PF) is .6, then, using 365 days per year and 24 hours per day yields a price floor of HR = (Rn*[(PC)l(N DP)] / [(24)*(365)*(PF)]. Using the example values from above yields HR = (.06)*[($10M/250) / [(24)*(365)*(.6)] = 45.662 cents per hour. This amount, which happens to be $3.65 for an 8 hour day, could be described as the full cost price of the parking since it generates the desired return on the investment required to build the parking. This is also shown in Table 1. 6.13 Full-Cost, Protected Vacancy Pricing (FCPVPP) The significance of a vacancy rate of 15% was explained in the description of Feature 6. If demand is high due to some special event or if parking was undersized at a development, it may happen that during certain hours of the day, vacancy rates may fall below the 15%, unless increases in price are applied. The "Preserved Vacancy" portion of the name means that the price is then increased as needed to support Feature 6. Steep, geometric increases will probably be needed, applied as multiplication factors to the Full Cost Pricing (FCP) derived price, as the vacancy range drops below, 30%, in 5% increments. Until these diurnal, hourly effects or special event effects are well understood, the geometric base value of 2 could be used. Using this logic, since a vacancy rate of 15% is to be avoided, as soon as vacancy drops below 30%, the hourly rate would double. If the vacancy rate continues to decline to less than 25%, this method would double the rate again. If, in spite of this quadrupling of the base price, the vacancy rate continues to decline to less than 20%, the rate would double again, for an 8 fold increase in the price. For our example, this hourly rate would be 8* ($.45662) _ $3.65 per hour. If in spite of this, the rate dropped below 15%, the rate would double again, to be $7.31 per hour. This is shown on the left side of Table 2, for the base multiplier of 2. Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 14 August 2, 2008 If the base multiplier value of 2 resulted in increases that were too small to preserve a vacancy rate of 15%, the computer would learn this lesson and the next time the vacancy rate dropped below 30%, the base factor would be selected to be some value larger than 2, such as 2.5. Table 2 shows the hourly rates for base factors of 2 and 2.5, given a baseline, full cost price. The time and date of events must be known, data for them must be kept, and they must be then be anticipated with appropriate price increases. Feature 6 requires that the price be increase to preserve a vacancy rate of at least 15%. Table 3 shows multiplication factors which can be computed for any value of vacancy, "V", without the stair stepping of Table 2. This means that every time a car parked or left the parking block, the hourly rate would change. The charge would be the time-weighted average of the various rates that were being applied during the time a car was parked. 6.14 Set of Assumptions For Sample Calculation of Cost & Benefit, 4 Groups The following numbers are from the Belvedere application approved by the City Council on April 16th, 2008. There are 8,000 square feet of retail/office, 65 condominiums, and 28 live-work lofts. Under a traditional parking ordinance, the requirement would be 32 spaces for the retail/office, 130 spaces for the condominiums, and 28 for the live-work spaces, for a total of 190 spaces. It is assumed that there will be 150 spaces actually built. Table 4 shows the beneficiary groups and the calculations leading to Number of Parking Spaces in each BGP (each N BGP). 6.15 Sample Calculation of Benefits and Costs Table 5 uses the assumption that there are 150 parking spaces; each one is worth $40,000; leading to the base price hourly rate of 46 cents. In Table 5 it is also assumed that during the day there are 24 workers, 20 lofts owners, 40 condo owners parked, and these groups of people benefit equally from the allocated number of parking. The name of the groups and the allocations are shown in Table 4. 7.0 Supporting Tables Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 15 August 2, 2008 Table 1 Full Cost, Base Price, Input Variable Definitions Example Name Variable Name ~ Descriptioin Value N_DP Number of parking places in a development Parking lot 175 PC Parking Cost $7,000,000.00 Space Cost of single parking space $40,000.00 RI Retum on Investment .06 PF Time Averaged Percent Full .60 Calculation of Full Cost Base Price Hourly Rate, "HR" HR = [ (RI)*(PC)/(N_DP) ] / [ (24*365) * PF ] Using Example Values above: HR = $0.46 Full Cost (or Value) Pricing Example Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 16 August 2, 2008 Table 2 Base Rate Multiplication Factors and Stair-Step Hourly Rates, (HR's) for Two Base Multiplier Values and a Base HR = $o.4s Base Multiplier = 2 Base Multiplier = 2.5 Vacancy Multiplicat ion Factors Hourly Multiplicat ion Factors Hourly Rate Formula Value Rate (HR) Formula Value Rate (HR) Above 35% 2° 1 $0.4s 2° 1 $0.4s 35% to 30% 2° 1 $0.4s 2.51 0.456621 $0.21 30%to 25% 21 2 $0.91 2.51 2.5 $1.14 25% to 20% 22 4 $1.83 2.52 6.25 $2.85 15% to 20% 23 8 $3.s5 2.53 15.625 $7.13 10%to 15% 24 16 $7.31 2.54 39.0625 $17.84 5%to 10% 25 32 $14.s1 2.55 97.65625 $44.59 Stair-Step Price Multiplication to Achieve Protected Vacancy Pricing Table 3 Base Rate Multiplication Factors for Ramping Hourly Rates, (HR's) for Two Base Multiplier Values and Base HR = $o.4s Vacancy Base of Multiplier = "B" = 2 Base of Multiplier = "B" = 2.5 Rabe Multi lication Factors Hourly Multi lication Factors Hourly "V" Formula Middle "V" Value Rabe (HR) Formula Middle "V" Value Rabe (HR) Above 35°~ 1 1 $0.4s 1 1 $0.4s 35°k to 30°~ t 1 $0.4s t 1 $0.4s 30°~ to 25°k I 1.414213562 $O.s5 I 1.58113883 $0.72 25°~ bo 20°k B(30 - V)/5 2.828427125 $1.29 B(30 - V)/5 3.952847075 $1.80 15°~ to 20°k 5.656854249 $2.5g 9.882117688 $4.51 10°~ to 15% ~ 11.3137085 $5.17 ~ 24.70529422 $11.28 5% bo 10% 22.627417 $10.33 61.76323555 $28.20 Continuous Price Multiplication to Achieve Protected Vacancy Pricing Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 17 August 2, 2008 Table 4 Calculation of Parking Spaces Allocated to Each Beneficiary Group if Total Parkin Supplied = 150 Fraction Built = 150 / 190 Traditional = 0.7895 Amount of Beneficiary Group Beneficiary Parking Parking Allocation Group Number Required "N BGP" Condo Owners' 65 130 102.63 Loft Owners' 28 28 22.11 Workers 32 32 25.26 Sum: 190 150.00 Example of Computing Beneficiary Group Parking Allocations Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 18 August 2, 2008 Table 5 Total Parking Supplied "N_DP" = Collection 150 Calculations Day Night Base Price 65 Condo owners 40 80 $0.46 28 Loft owners 20 24 Per Hour 32 Workers 24 0 General Public 20 10 Total 104 114 Fraction Full 0.693 0.760 Vacancy, "V%" 30.67 24.00 HourlyRateMultiplier 1.00 2.30 HourlyRate, "HR" $0.46 $1.05 Hours duration 12.00 12.00 $PerSpaceOverHours $5.48 $12.59 Total Collection $569.86 $1,435.09 TotalForDa $2,004.95 Spending Earning C alculations Calculation = Total For Day = Number Parked * Allocated Percent of $2,004.95 Per HR * 12 Hours Parking Total, "N_DP" Multiplied by Worker or Day Night Total N BGP N_BGP / N DP N BGP / N DP Household Condo owne $219.18 $1,007.08 $1,226.26 102.63 0.6842 $1,371.81 $21.10 Loft owne $109.59 $302.12 $411.71 22.11 0.1474 $295.47 $10.55 Worke $131.51 $0.00 $131.51 25.26 0.1684 $337.68 $10.55 General Public $109.59 $125.88 $235.47 0.00 0.00 $0.00 Tota I $569.86 $1, 435.09 $2, 004.95 150 1 $2, 004.95 Each worker that parked paid $5.48 Each worker earned $10.55 Worker that parked netted $5.07 Condo ~ Loft Owners that parked in the day paid $5.48 Condo 8 Loft Owners that parked in the night paid $12.59 Condo 8 Loft Owners that parked 24 hours paid $18.07 However, all Condo Owners earned $21.10 Condo Owners that parked 24 hours netted $3.04 However, all Loft Owners earned $10.55 Loft Owners that parked 24 hours netted -$7.52 The general public that parked all day paid $5.48 The general public that parked all night paid $12.59 One Day Net Cost/Benefit for 4 Groups Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 19 August 2, 2008 Table 6 CH2M Hill Work Trips Mode Before After Drive Alone 89% 54% Carpool 9% 12% Bus 1% 17% Bike, Walk 1% 17% 100% 100% What $54/month (1995 $'s) for Not Driving Did at CH2M Hill, an Engineering Firm in Bellevue, Washington, Near Seattle Reference: How to Get Paid to Bike to Work by Patrick Siegman Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 20 August 2, 2008 Table 7 Financial Incentives, Impact on Parking Demand* Employees, Financial Incentive per Parking Location Scope Assumed No. mo. (1995 $'s) Decrease Group A: Areas with little or no pu blic transportation Century City District, 3500 employees surveyed 3500 $81 15% West Los An leles at 100+ firms Cornell University Ithaca, NY 8000 faculty & staff 9000 $34 26% San Fernando Valley, 1 large employer (850 850 $37 30% Los An les em to ees Bellevue, WA 1 medium-sized firm (430 430 $54 39% em to ees Weighted Average of Group Sum 13780 $46.75 23.9% Group B: Areas with fair public tra nsportatio n Los Angeles Civic 10000+ employees at 10000 $125 36% Center several or anizations Mid-Wilshire Blvd., Los An leles 1 mid-size firm 430 $89 38% Washington DC 5500 employees at 3 5500 $68 26% Suburbs worksites Downtown Los Angeles 5000 employees surveyed 5000 $126 25% at 118 firms Weighted Average of Group Sum 20930 $109.52 30.8% Group C: Areas with good public t ransportati on University of 50,000 faculty, staff & 50000 $18 24% Washin ton, Seattle students Downtown Ottowa, Canada 3500+ government staff 3500 $72 18% Weighted Average of Group Sum 53500 $21.53 23.6% Weighted Average Over 3 Groups $46.35 25.3°l0 Ten Cases of Cashout, from How to Get Paid to Bike to Work: A Guide to Low- traffic, High profit Development. Published in Bicycle Pedestrian Federation of America, 1995 Bullock DraftOfParkingPlan 21 August 2, 2008 CC ;~~S~GS ~.z ~ Kimberly Smith From: Mike Bullock [mike bullock@earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 5:01 PM To: City Clerk Subject: SuggestedConditionsOfUseForOaksRedevelopment Attachments: IntelligentParking6.doc; Adopted Addendum to 2007RTP Guidelines.doc Subject: Item 27, Redevelopment of the Oaks Shopping Center Honorable Mayor Sandoval and Members of the Council: ~~ ~ ~ ~ l.: i`.v l:i LU ~'. cu~hl~ E _; +o cli~r c~F~~~ After living in the Monta Vista neighborhood for 35 years, I have retired from Lockheed and moved to Oceanside. I have expanded my interest in car parking into "Smart Growth" situations. "Smart Growth" reduces VMT by mixing uses, sharing parking, and unbundling the cost of parking. (I still am a proponent of car parking cashout at places of employment, where pay parking is not politically viable.) I support the Item 27 proposal. However, I think that some very important conditions of use need to be applied, as described in the attachment. "Intelligent Parking" can be applied concurrently at De Anza, where students and faculty will be the two "beneficiary groups", since the parking lot there is said to be "for them". This approach can then spread through the city as needed. Please carefully read the Pricing Strategy (Page 3) of the other attachment. It tells us that our state Transportation Commission is ready to confront reality in a meaningful way. I hope Cupertino is ready to do this also. Here is the Preface of "Intelligent Parking". 1.0 Preface Intelligent urban planning reduces the need for parking and the total miles that are driven. It does this by having the following four characteristics: 1.) It clusters development around good transit stations or transit stops. 2.) It makes it safe and easy to use non-motorized modes of travel. 3.) It has a local balance between development that uses mostly night-time parking and development that uses mostly day-time parking. balance should be no worse than 60%-40%. 4.) Parking is placed to support the sharing of parking. However, intelligent urban planning will fall far short of minimizing the need for parking or minimizing the miles that are driven unless the following operational characteristics are adopted: 1.) Nearly all parking is shared. This means that it is almost always the case that anyone can park anywhere. 2.) Parking is operated so that the potential users of parking can escape the expense of parking by choosing to not use the parking. Thi: characteristic is named "unbundled" to note that the cost of parking is unbundled from other costs. 3.) Parking is priced and marketed to reduce the need to drive around looking for parking. It is priced to ensure availability. The Intelligent Parking technology that accomplishes the above three operational characteristics also does the following. 4.) Parking at any desired price is made as easy as possible, for most users. 5.) Records of the use of each parking space are kept. This will facilitate decisions to either add or subtract parking spaces. This plan describes how the unbundling is accomplished. It describes both the hardware and software needed. New understandings about energy and the environment will cause more people and companies to seek out cities that have embraced be sustainability and old-fashioned values of fairness and economic choice, implemented with the latest technology. With the implementation of Intelligent Parking, cities can become more compact, functional, and successful. Respectively submitted, Mile Bullock cc gls~o~ ~~~ Linda Lagergren j;'-;~'~ 7 ~ ~ 7 •h 7j y -.- From: Ronda Hoxsie [rhoxsie@yahoo.com] 1- rr .,` ~ ~ ~- ~~ Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 4:52 PM %' • To: Dolly Sandoval ' ~~ +-•` Cc: Kris Wang; Orrin Mahoney; Gilbert Wong; Mark Santoro .- Subject: oaks shopping center Dear Mayor Sandoval and members of the Cupertino City Council, We are opposed to the hotel/condo project being proposed for the Oaks shopping center. That area does not need more traffic and cars. There is enough traffic with De Anza college and the off/on ramps for 85. There are mature oak trees and many heritage trees on that site. We enjoy going to the Oaks for meals at Hobee's, Togos, the new Thai restaurant and getting coffee or Jamba Juice. I used to go Clean Well Lighted Place for Books. We have purchased books at Aida's for our daughter. We used to enjoy Pedro's and the movie theatre. We wish both were still there. The Oaks could be turned into a great gathering place. I'd love it if a farmer's market was there. The Oaks is a great place to go for dinner before going to the Flint Center or to activities at Memorial Park. Please do not let the character be ruined by another ugly hotel/convention center. Cupertino is losing all of it's attractive spaces. The Cali plaza is nice but there's no parking and it's surrounded by very busy streets. The Oaks is a nice respite from the busy streets. Bob has lived in Cupertino since 1965. I have lived here since 1989. Bob often talks about moving away because Cupertino has lost so much of it's character and charm. The Oaks is the closest thing we have a to downtown like Los Altos or Mt. View. Let's capitalize on it, not destroy it. Regards, Ronda & Bob Hoxsie 10545 Mira Vista Road Cupertino, CA i cc ~~s~o~ ~z~ Colin Jung From: Sent: To: Subject: Elinora [mantomcclure@yahoo.com] Tuesday, August 05, 2008 4:21 PM Colin Jung Oaks Shopping Center Ladies and Gentlemen; I write to express my strong opposition to the development application filed by Karen Ngo with regard to the proposed redevelopment and subdivision of The Oaks shopping center. It is my opinion that the proposed uses are incompatible with the site's location, will lead to unmanageable traffic congestion, and further diminish the opportunities for small businesses to succeed in Cupertino. Likewise, I do not believe that Cupertino needs another hotel, nor a "convention center" structure (whatever that might be). And, I do not believe that we need more condos in an already congested area. The City's infrastructure can barely support the population we currently have. I would also like to express my disappointment at the City's leadership, which has, for the past decade (at least) stood by and let a once-flourishing and attractive local shopping center degrade into an under-used eyesore. It has become a self-fulfilling prophecy -- a dismal center in sore need of revitalization, because it was allowed to become so. This City deserves better from its elected leaders and from City Staff. I am, unfortunately, unable to attend tonight's hearing; but. the above are the comments I would have made in person. Very truly yours, Elinora Mantovani 11238 Bubb Road Cupertino, CA 908-257-1463 Elinora Mantovani Sent from my iPhone 1 Page 1 of 1 _CC ~ S D~' Colin Jung ~~ From: Ronda Hoxsie [rhoxsie@yahoo.com] ~~D~-~ Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 4:43 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: oaks shopping center Colin, We are opposed to the hotel/condo project being proposed for the Oaks shopping center. That area does not need more traffic and cars. There is enough traffic with De Anza college and the off/on ramps for 85. ~2~] S~V~ There are mature oak trees and many heritage trees on that site. We enjoy going to the Oaks for meals at Hobee's, Togos, the new Thai restaurant and getting coffee or Jamba Juice. I used to go Clean Well Lighted Place for Books. We have purchased books at Aida's for our daughter. We used to enjoy Pedro's and the movie theatre. We wish both were still there. The Oaks could be turned into a great gathering place. I'd love it if a farmer's market was there. The Oaks is a great place to go for dinner before going to the Flint Center or to activities at Memorial Park. Please do not let the character be ruined by another ugly hoteUconvention center. Cupertino is losing all of it's attractive spaces. The Cali plaza is nice but there's no parking and it's surrounded by very busy streets. The Oaks is a nice respite from the busy streets. Bob has lived in Cupertino since 1965. I have lived here since 1989. Bob often talks about moving away because Cupertino has lost so much of it's character and charm. The Oaks is the closest thing we have a to downtown like Los Altos or Mt. View. Let's capitalize on it, not destroy it. Regards, Ronda & Bob Hoxsie 10545 Mira Vista Road Cupertino, CA 8/5/2008 c~ ~~~,~g ~-~ ~ 27 August 4, 2008 City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, Ca 95014 Community Development Department Re: Oaks Shopping Center Application Dear Colin, Following please find our responses to the `Staff Recommended Conditions of Approval' on your staff report regarding the above referenced application: 13. Building Materials and Architecture: The architectural drawings show a frame around the windows which give the look of `inset' windows. Awnings are shown on the 4~h floor only for all elevations. We did not put balconies on the 2nd floor of the west elevation facing Highway 85 as it is not visible from the freeway. See attached computer simulation. We believe our modifications have met the intent of enhancing the building architecture. 14a.Hotel Building Setback from Marv Avenue: We do not see a need to eliminate any hotel rooms. We have met the Code requirement fora 20' setback, and the 2nd row of finger island trees on Mary Avenue already provide adequate visual setback. See attached simulation. Furthermore, for financial feasibility reasons we cannot afford to lose that many rooms. 14b. Length of Hotel Stay: We cannot limit our guests to hotel stays of 30 days per booking. We can try to work out a system whereby TOT will be paid on stays over 30 days. 4b. Modification of Tentative Parcel Map and Condominium Plan: Staff's suggestion of a phased condominium plan does not resolve our issue with potential lenders. We are not able to secure financing with a conditional approval for a future lot line adjustment; we need to have a separate legal parcel forfinancing. Stevens Creek Boulevard (Heart of the City) Landscaping: We will agree to install Heart of the City landscaping from and including the Easterly driveway to Mary Avenue. Note that the hotel has no frontage on Stevens Creek Blvd., and the mixed-used building has minimal Stevens Creek frontage. Sincerely, Karen Ngo reV'~ g IsIDR ' ~'. ~. \% ~ ~'!i , `', .~' .. 'r 1 12 1 ~'~` `ir z 0 I D N zoo s¢}~,~k ~'~ 1 I ~o ~ 1'~J 41 r~R_, ,,, - ~~~~ m~ ;~ ~~~ ~ i ~' HOTEL 122 UNITS a • sroRY FOOTPRINT: 23,158 SF. TOTAL AREA 67,ets s.F. ;. 1 C o\ ' ~' , r 1 \ v.. y ~~ \~ `' .~ ~, ' p I/ \49 ~',~~ I 4 ~.` 0 I ' ~7 . ., o ~ I r , 4 y I mwerowm I L ~ `.. ~..:.. I+ - I ldC°, .,y..,: .',>',: ' ., q mm~eanrvme '0p ai ~e - . ~ ~' ... - ~~ n ao m m I I ~ rommxweuenes 3 STORY ~ uu>oer.l roEOarniex<o I jE1RETAIL4 RETAIL/ I B,DOOS.F OFFICEI CONVENTION :, I b j 4 .. CENTER I_J_ FOOTPRINT: I 7Ap69 S.F, bl Q 9 TOTPLME~I Y:, ,BIII 56,1946.E "~ „F ~ ~ ~~ y 4 ~ \ ^ m7 Fnox ` 8GV 10E ~aa3iau .i q woxwen ' ~ ~ . ~\ N PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PARKING REQUIREMENT: nv I ~~ w~~ I rtvvm vlvl I nnn. OFFSTREETPARKINGPROVIDED ~OSSPACES MDDEL•B D~DOORPDOI UNDERGROUND PARKING PROVIDED 18S SPACES a16TA0CY T7rts 1t 2rd 5.d 4M n TOTAL 4703PACE5 ~ Aodad _ tp lox t6 t5 t5 t5 I 54dm Noedmd - 21 IeU D 4 4 4 ' Shdm - 72 kot (otx~lr boh) 1 2 2 ! Shia Stadod o< k`de Cmr 1 1 1 1 Wd Stu6n 6®i 1 Betrmm SbdmE Y S S S 1 Bdmn Fk S S 3 S ' dd 1 Dedimm 16 ' 2 Ddiaoin SudoJ 1 4 4 4 ' PoaiAope/fdd 2 ArBaom 1Jx ' Tdeh Pr floor 16 J2 32 31 IOTN. 411E61A9A16 1 ACCESSIBLEAND HEARING IMPAIRED ROOMS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL THE APPUGABLE CODES OF THE AUTHORITY hIAVING JURISDICTION. NUMBER OF REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE GUESTRODMS SHALL BE CONFlRMED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD FOR EACH SPECIFIC PROJECT. ALL ACCESSIBLE O GUESIROOMS MUST BE INTERCONNECTING ROOMS I AND THE TOTAL NUMBER SHALL ALSO COMPLY WfTH MA.RRIOTT DEBIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA -----_ \ ~ P \ `~ a ~ b D 0 ~\\ :' ~ / (~ \~ t t 0 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD o\i ~~~~ T y O:. 1 1 ~x 1 `~ 1 \ ~ I .~:~ RETAIL 1 TD,ose s.F ~: a." I I }0' ',1, :'O.. ~ip,. ~~~.. b 4 DE ANZA COLLEGE CAMPUS Denic^ Oflice: $ 560 Fint 6 l reef, Ste. &201 ~ Denicle, CA 81510 f 7e1: (707)7150502 VallelS OHice', 616 Verin Street Vallejo, CA A15DA Tel: (7071 556.117 1 arceercinc erchite cle.c9m ~ ~ ~ ~ m I- Y ~ ~ ~ U d ~ Z ~ ~ r X ~ U '? _ ceS ~ Y Q w = a ~ = U F - 2 ~ Z ~ a O J p ~ ~ ~ ~ o Z a a Q U ~ Q ~ = W ^ g g a ~ ¢ i €~ onTe 8-5-08 ~ REV. N0. REY. DATE , PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN X-61 Joe No.: SHP03 ~~ S lslo~ ~~•~„ ~z~ ~/ 1 ~.\~ 1 ~ 3 7~ ~~;; c~l'~~in4., ~ ;. .\ \ /, i v ~ouroa a elomwv Preseenox \' e~ i ~ ~ /' uraEOP ue>aomrw 1 PMpMi t , / . 1 R 1 `" ~~ Q ! ~ /! o ~r ~ ~j~ 6114 ! a MARY AV I 1 ~~ r 1'1n HOTEL ~ ~ t y l j l I j 11' r'I I 122 UNITS ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ _ `. i I I ~ I I ~ ; '~ ~ . d ~ ~ - I 4 FOO7PRINT: 1 'I am 73,155 S.F. ,y p 41 ° ToTUARFX . 1 ~ ~ ' [' 81,817 S.F. I . ' v. . - - - - - 1 { LOU.I~IONtF ?'1 i I I PW I I ~ I ~ o ~ , t ~~ ' I P,1D 5 r p~y11 sh r saes I >; ~ d:a ra 1 ' } ~ ~Q 8 1 `. .f .. ~.', rnrl 1 I ~, ~ I ~ ~~ 4 I h ~/ 1'~-.. ~ 1 ' { ~: PAD - ' g11LIIE V IIf:A11E I ~ o \! t t 1 puAOO eF.) ~ _ I _ ip eE pEMCLBI~ _ ~ ,y 1 I I ~ varroxrrewulxe Rzaoesa i ' ~ I 3 STORY ~, I ~ roeEOEUrrslln E( )RETNL4 i # ~ i I B,000S.F = °~ OFFC EI CONVEMION g b i 9 O t .~ I = I CENTER ~ I--1-- !Z •1 I - + y < I FOOTPRINT: I 18,180 S.F. bl 9 g . ly 1 TOTAL AREA: IYEI pr 56,1B45F. 9 ~ h ~ `. 70' 0 ~., .~~^~ ~ ~~ ~ 56 1~ oaaierea MpaMdT ~ - q - ~ _ _ _ ~p~ PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN scALE: r = 4n~' PARKING REQUIREMENT: OFFSTREET PARKING PROVIDED 3055PACE5 UNDERGROUND PARKING PROVIDED 165 SPACES TOTAL 4705PACE5 ~,~,v ti ' z OM UNIT MIX: , KODEL•B DIITDDORP00L GUE51RDOU itPES Studio StandoN - 19 toot 1sl 15 2M 75 3b 15 1th 75 TOTAL 60 Gludio Standok - 21 toot 0 4 4 I 72 3ludio - 22 toot (aattssible boys) I 2 2 2 7 Studio SlaadaM of Inside Comu I 1 i I A Pacentage/'old 61uda I &draom Standak I Bedroom End Puurdoge~aml' Bedroom 2 3 66E 3 3 IBS 3 3 3 3 B3 11 12 23 2 Bedroom SloMord A 4 4 4 16 Percealoge~alol 2 Badroom 135 16 totals Per FI00r 26 32 12 32 TorN cuESTBOOUS I22 ACCE5518LE AND HEARING IMPAIRED RODMS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL THE APPLICABLE CODES OF THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. O NUMBER OF REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE GUESTROOMS SHALL BE CONFIRMED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD FOR EACH SPECIFIC PROJECT. ALL ACCESSIBLE GUESTROOMS MUST BE INTERCONNECTING ROOMS AND THE TOTAL NUMBER SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH MARRIOTT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA. li Q \ 3 `~\ a ~ \ a 9 O ~ \ ~\ E( 1 RETAL 5 B 19,980 S.F 77 o t rr 1 k t "~ B 1 1 E RETNL3 ~ 1 9,587 S.F I E RI 1 ETAIL 2 ° I 5,BD0 S.F p o E( )RETAIL 1 3 70,058 S.F i i ~. D. I D 5 iJ y o- 1 0 0 ~ ~ b Q STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD DE ANZA COLLEGE CAMPUS Benioie Oliiae: 58D Firat Street, Ste B?Ot Benicia, C A 91510 Tel: (707) 715.0501 Velleio OHide: fi16 Mer1n Street Vdle)o, CA 91500 Tel: (707) 556.111 1 era®uain cerahile ote.com ~ . J In W ~ O U ~ t1 ~ Z W W ~ ~ ~ W r U X otS ~ I;~ Z Q Q H 3 ~ 0 w = U l - 2 Z a 0 U J N LJ ~ / LL . W O ~ ~ Z U a v w = W Q ~ ~ Z DATE: T-22-08 REV. REV. DATE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN s X-54 ~ JoBNO.: SHP03