CC Resolution No. 271a
/ 1
1 ipU �n
I'
a �
r
4
ly
4
.
J 4
4
MISO,,,LrTION NO y ;
J'
e
Al M3.50 )TI ON 19P TUA 01'1 COUNCIL OF TM CI4`N OV
DX PH3WNG M MWOM M'1033WAY STEMX E '019 ('WN1'Y
OP SA "A CLARK AS D BY ` 13B COUMY TPU}% MAYS
.OMMED
4
WHOM t9:* City Coonuil has her�,tofore oxpresetd
a
Its opposition to the proposed expressways sybteW until
question of JuAsdietlan and access dnd flmncial problems
are solved; and
3
W1VWj%S, the pro"tnt proposal is completely indefinite
.g
and uncertain as to cost, method of financing, jurisdiction
for ownership and mait:tenance, permanency of expressway
character, and bonding capacity of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Council feels that the benefits to its
citizens, at this point, highly speculative;
NOW, THEREFORE, EE IT RESOLVED that the City Council
disapproves the propoaed expressway system planned and
reaffirmts its vote in opposition thereto as made in open
meeting of the Tra.f.'fieways Committee.
r
BE IT RUR'.VHBR RESOLVED that the City Clerk be and
hereby is directed to transmit a certified copy of this
Resolution to the ClerU of the Hoard of Supervisors of
Santa Clara County.
r
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of � ,, ',•► �,!
1960 by the City Council of the City of ����fc by
the following vote;
a
/ 1
1 ipU �n
I
f
ATTM:
I hereby cert
exact copy of
ia on file In
City Of f1ce.
t er of uc
if ttmt this is an
the original Witch
the
RE or
n