CC Resolution No. 6764 .
. .
• ~
RFSOII7rI~I NO. 6764
A RE.'SOIIJI'I~J OF 'II~ CriPft OOUNCIL OF 'II~ CL7.'Y OF QJPII7i'II~TO
2~I~~C' C~IN FTNDItaGS RDQUIRID BY ~ CAI~IIA
~L (~AI~PY P.CP IN ~II~TE]CPI~t 4~'IIi ~
CANf~LLn't'rON OF A WILLIAMSOf1 AGT QONI~tA '~3ATING
'I~D REAL PROPf~'Q'Y AND ADOFI'1NG A NF7GF~ ~
I~CCARATI~J ~4~12DOF
BE IT RF50L~ID by the city Oouncil of the city of Cl~peztino:
Wf~2EAS, the Oo~mcil int.e~ds to approve the carioellation of a
Williamson Act ~ontract relatirig to real praperty described on the
attachsd FSchibit ~~Ao (hereinafter °territoiyn) which Gbntract was recorded
Febzva2.y 27, 1973 in Book 0254, gages 148 et seq. oP Official ReooYds of
tha Ft~oYder of the Oauity of Santa Clara, State of California; arrl
Wf~2EAS, the California Envirorm~ental Quallty A~t of 1970, as amended
(CDQ~1), required tl~at in the approval of a pmject for whirh a Negative
Declaratio~ has been pn~pared, the decision making body must raview said
rregative Declaration; and
Wf~FAS, a project for such territoYy was tha subject of a Negative
Declaratio~ reaamner~ded for Cau~cil approval by the FY~viromnental Review
Camnittee and the Planniryg ocemnission;
Now, ~RE, ba it resolved that the GUUncil does herel7y:
1. Identify the Project that is mentioned in this resolution as the
canoellation of a Williamson Act Oon;ract arid disestablichir~r the
Agricultural Preserve which re.lates to real pmpe.rty described aai the
attached F3chibit ~~A~~~
2. Declazps that cancellation of the contract and the canyirg crut of
said project in ita approval form will not have a aignificant effect
on the er~vizosunent.
PASSID AND AD~PI~ at a req~Ltar meetirg oP the City Oouncil of the
City of Q~pertino this 3YSi day of Febzvazy, 1986 by the follaairg vot.e:
~ • •
RESOILfl'IOi~I NO. 6764
Vote ~`iembers of the City Oouncil
AYFS: Gatto~ Johnson, PltutigY~ SP~'~~ ~4~
NOFS: None
assarr: rrone
I+BSTAa1: None
I APF~ROVED:
I
d~iQ y
Mayor, city of Cupert
AZTFST:
;
l~
~
/ G~
l~ G~ ~~i~i Gae'~
City erk
~ ~~'•~r ' ' ~
"SOUTH STELLIhG ROAD - 85-03"
(~10K)
All that certain real property situate in tkie Coun[y of Santa Clara, State of
California, more particularly described as follows:
Being a portion of Lot C as shown on that certain Record of Survey Ptap recorded
in Book 79 of Maps, page 24, Santa Clara County, more particularly described as
follows:
Beginning at the sou[hwest corner of said "Lot C" as shown on the aforementioned
Record of Survey Map, said corner being the intersection of [hat certain annexation
to the City of Cupertino entitled "South Stelling Road 81-3" with that'certain
reorganization en[itled "San Jose/Cupertino Municipal Reorganization" dated July
1, 1919;
Thence NORTH, 415.41 feet along the westerly boundary of said "Lot C" and the
easterly boundary of said annexation "South Stelling Road 81-3";
Thence along the northerly boundary of said "Lot C" the following bearings and
( distances:
I N 89 °S~'32" E, 1~4.69 feet;
N 45 °00'E, 142.06 feet;
N 88 °09'05" E, 27.28 feet;
Thence S 40°43'49" E, 337.54 feet along the boundary of land conveyed to the
State of California by instrument recorded November 22, 1960 in Book 4989, page
340 of Official Records of Santa Clara County, to the center line of Regnart
Creek;
Thence along the boundaries common co the sou~herly boundary of said "Loc C"
and the northwesterly boundary of [hat certain annexation to the City of Cup-
ertino entitled "Orogrande 79-7" the following bearings and distances:
S 35°15' W, 38.89 feet;
S 74 °52' W, 53.11 feet;
S 55 °OS' W. 53.74 feet;
N 70 °26' W, 51.36 feet;
S 70 °31' W, 93.72 feet;
S 58 °29' W, 115.35 feet;
S 12 °43' W, 61.52 feet;
S 34 °20'48" W, 60.86 feet;
Thence S 89 °57'32" W, 121.92 feec along said southerly boundary of "Lot C"
and the boundary of said San Jose /Cuper[ino Municipal Reorganization to the
Point of Beginning.
- Containing: 3.49 acres more or less
A: P.N.• 9 362-U-3 . "EXNIBIT A„