CC Resolution No. 6381 ~ ~ ~
' RESOLUTION NO 6391
' A RES~LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN CONCERNIN6
LAND USE AND CIRCULATION.
' WHEREAS, the City Coun~il as a part of the comprehensive
i General Plan study, has reviewed the recommendations of the
Planninq Commission and has held public hearings involving many
citizens and hours of discussion, and
i WHEREAS, the City Council has concluded its deliberatio~
relative to the General Plan Amendment.
~I~ NOW, THEREFOkE, BE IT RESOLVED:
I 1. That the City Council hereby adopts an amendment to
' the 6eneral Plan as set forth in Exhibit A attached
hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That the City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor to
endorse said adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ak a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Cupertino this 16th day of July, 1984, by
the following vate:
Votg Members of_the_City_Council
AYES: Council Members Gatto, Johnson, Rogers, Sparks and
Mayor Piungy
NOES: None
ASSENT; None
ABSTAIN: None
APPROVED:
or, ty of Cup o
ATTEST:
~
Ci ty Cl erk~~~~~ -
' • 1-~-84
Exhibit A
' ' Resolution No. b381
1. Policy_~_40 of the General Plan is reworded.
, Policy 2-40 A minimum lot size for a co~ventio~al
single-family residentiai zoned parcel is
6,000 sq. ft. The owner of a~ existing
legally created, substandard residential
' property which is less tha~ 6,000 sq. ft.
but equal to or greater than 5,000 sq,
ft., may utiliae said parcel for a
' regidential purpose.
' The owner of a legally created parcel of
' less than 5,000 sq. ft. may also develop
' fas a single-family reside~tial building
site) if it can be demonstrated that the
property was not under the same ow~ership
as any contiguous property on the same
; street frontage as of, or after, the
effective date of this amendment.
Owners of contiguous substandard
residentiai lots of record which do not
; conform with den5ity provisio~s af the
I'~ General Pian have the ability to
j reconfigure said lots when it results in
; a more logical development pattern and is
generally consistent with the ~haracter
of the surrounding neighborhood. A
; consolidatian or reconfiguration ehould
i not result in more lots or potential
dwelling units than a number of legel
lots of record permitted by the second
paragraph of this policy.
,
2, Policy__6a__(Land_ Use__Intensity)__of_1_6PA_80_is_amended_ by
adding_a_6atg)_
I, Policy be tg) I~ order to facilitate the rehabilitation
of older retail shopping center~
, constructed prior to the adoption of the
"Core Area Pian" on detember 14, 1973,
, the City Council may approve a building
area incresse for a subject ce~ter even
~ though said increase exceeds tha base
! level Floor Area Ratio constraint.
I
~ The allowed in~rease may range from O to
I 5,000 sq. ft. of additional gross floor
space over the existing f2oor area. The
precise amount of additional square
I footage wili be cammensurate to the
I
~
I Page 1 of 2
i
i
' •1-GPA-84 •
Ehhibit A
Res. No. b381 tConti~ued)
~ degree which an appiicant complies with
, the general performance standards listed
II below:
1. The development plan
I~ incorporates new landscapi~g
and other eite improvements.
ii
2. The development plan
in~orporates architectural
' revisions consistent with
Ge~eral Plan Design Standards.
' 3. The development plan provides
' space for new activities which
are more consistent with land
use or other policies conteined
in the General Plan.
4. The development plan provides
other benefits consistent with
the policies contained in the
General Plan.
3. Amend the Stevens Creek Boulevard Plan Line: Action Plan.
The "Stevens Creek Houlevard Plan Line
Study: Action Plan" is amended to delete
reference to the Stevens Creek Houlevard
Pla~ Line.
4. Floor_Area_Ratio_Transfer_Policy_
Core Area properties designated for
commerciai office, and/or industrial land
use may tra~sfer Floor Area Ratio
Intensity Credit from one owner to
another. In the context of this policy.
a core area property is one which fronts
De Anza Houlevard from bollinger Road to
Homestead Road and Stevens C~eek
Houlevard from Stelli~g Road to the
easter~ limit of the Urban Service Area
Houndary. The policy also applies to
' properties that are not contiguous to
said street but are part of a shopping
center or planned industrialloffice
center which is contiguous to said
streets.
Properties involved in transfer must be
toned Planned Development and the degree
of transfer is d~termined based upo~ the
permitted lahd use intensity of the
trahsferring site.
' Page 2 of 2