CC Resolution No. 5760 . ~ •
RESOLUTION NO. 5760
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
GRANTING A VARIANCE TO NILDA ARGANDONA FROM SECTION
8,3.2b OF THE RESIDENTIAL SINCLE-FAHILY 20NING ORDINANCE
TO PERMIT A 12 FT. SETBACK IN LIEU OF A 20 FT. SETBACK
FOR A SECOND STORY ELEMENT; LOCATED ON MOUNT CREST DRIVE
APPROXIMATELY 120 FT, SOUTH OF LINDA VISTA DRIVE IN A
R1-22 ZONING DISTRICT
~ WHEREAS, the applicant has met tha burden of proof required to support
her said application; and
I WtiEREAS, the Planning Commission, af[er duly notice public hearings,
has forwarded its recommendation to the City Council;
I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after careful consideration of
maps, facts, exhibits and other evidence submitted in this matter, the
' application for the Variance (5-V-81) be and the same is hereby approved,
subject to conditions in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2260, at[ached
hereunto as Exhibit "A".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED tha[ the report of Eindings attached hereto is
approved and adopted, and that the City Clerk be and is hereby directed
to notify the parties affected by this decision.
PASSED A27D ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Cupertino this 16th day of November , 1981 by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES: Gatto, Johnson, Plungy, Rogers, Sparks
:tOES: :Ione
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST: APPROVED:
J` ~
Cicy Clerk Mayor, City of Cupe t no
• S-V-~
~ EXHIBIT "A"
t
RESOLUTIO;T ;l0. 2.'.60
OF THE PI.A.'1:II~G CO'CIISSIO~~OF 'fHE CITY
OF CUPHRTI:~O ~ECO`L`IEYDIYG aPPROVAL OF a
VARL.4iCE FRO:! SECTIOt7 8.].?b OF THE
RESIDE.`ITI.~II. SI:7CLE-FeL"IILY ZO:II:iG ORDI:7~.VCE
TO ?ER~lIT .1 12 FT. SETBe~Ci: I:l LIEU OF d
20 FT. SETB.IC~ FOR a SECOND STORY ELE:IE:JT.
.1PPLIC.~.~T: :+ilda argandona
~1DDRFSS: 7192 Via Vico, San Jose, California 95129
SUB;II2TED: Occober 2Q, 1981
LOC~TION: tJesc side oi ?I~. Crest Drive aporoxinacely 12Q [t, souch oi
Linda Visca ~rfve.
~ _
FI:7D I:ICS :
1. The narroer elongaced build:ag site and severa slooas on Ch13 oarcel
consciCute excraordinar;+ circuc~s[ances aopli:able co ~he land retzrrzd
Co in che applicacion ::hich does noc generally ai°ect other parcels
vithin the same dist:ict.
2. The granting of the variance is necessacy Eoc ,he preservation and
anjoymenc ot substantial prooercy righcs of tha pecicioner.
3• The variance ~rill no~ :nacerially affect che heal[:~ ~r saiecy o[
persons reslding or vorking ln Che neighborhood and vill noc 6e ~aceriall;~
detriaeacal co pu611c •.:elfare or injurious co proper~y or improver~encs
in eaid neia,hborhood.
COSID ITIOYS :
1-15. Standard Conditions co the excent chac chey do noc confllct rith che
special candicions enu~erated herein. In t~e evenc a conflict doe3
axist, tha soecial condicions enuaeraced herein shall analy.
15. The approval is based uoan F_Yhibit A o£ apolicacion 5-V-81.
PaSSED ~ND aDOPTID chis 9th day oi `tovember, 1981, at a regulac caeecing oi ~'~e
Planning Commission oE che Cicy o[ CupercSno, State of Caliiornia, by Che folloc+ing
roll call vote:
AYES:. Coffiissioners adams, Binneweg, Blaine, Koeni;zer, Chair~an Clandy
NAYS: Yone
ASSY~I;i: Yone
~1BSE,`7T: Yone
APPROVED:
/n/ John Claudq
ATT~SY: .lahn Claudy, Chainan
PlanninA Commisaio~
Jaaes H. Sisk
' Ylanaing Direc:or '
- 2 -
/ , ~ • ~
~ VdRI:1NCE
PIYDIDlCS .1:\D SOBCONCLUSIONS
WHEN RECOI`QSEi7D2:1G THE GeZ.L`7TIYG OF A VARI~V`!CE TtiE PL:VYNIVG CO!L"lISSION SH~1LL
MAKE ~1LL OF THE FOLLOWI:IG FI:7DIYGS:
; 1. That there ara special conditions or excepcional characceristice
. in the aature of cha property to be aifected, ur thac its loca-
cion or its surioundings are such ae caill pe nic che Coce~issiun
~ co maka a decerminacion chac a liceral enforcemenc oE the Ordinanca
i uould reaulc in praccical difficulties or unneceesary hardships;
i and
~ 2. That eha raacin oE ehe a lication is necessa Eor the
8 g Pp ry preserva-
cloa aad enioyment of subscancial property righcs; and
3. Thac ehn hearings shua chac the grancing of che application will
~ noc materially affecc adversely the heal~h or safecy of persons
i residing or worktng in the neighborhood uE ~he propercy vhich is
the subjecc of the aQplication, and thac che use of said property
~ in the manaer in vhich lt is proposed ~a be used will no~ be
macerially deerimental co ehe public velfare or in~urious co cha
value of praparty or ir~provemencs locaced in said surroundinge.
ADDITION,~LLY, dS A PART OF I'HE C0~@fIS5I0Y'S aCTIOY, SURCO\'CLGSIOYS :Y
SUPPORT OF THE ABOVE FIVDI;IGS SH.1LL BE :L1DE ORAI,LY, YAUS BECOMIVC a PaRT
' OF THE RECORD, PRIOR TO FIYaL VOtE ON THE APPLIGITI0:7.
' 47HE.`I RECOMSEciDI:iG TFiE DEVI.4I. OF a V,aRLLYC~, THE COM_~SISSIOY SHAI.L ADDRESS
ai.L OF THE ,1BOVE FI`tDIVGS. IF 2HE CO~L"fISS20Y IS WABLF TO ?L~ICE OYE OR
, `fORE OF THE FI:iDI:ICS, THE RECO.`L"fE:dDATION :NST BE FOR DE.`t2.1I.. SUBCOYCLUSIONS
Ta~ SL~PORT OF ?HE ABO~FE FIYD2:IG5 SH.V.L 9E :tADE ORdLLY, TAUS BECO~II:IG A PdRT
OF TFiE RECORD, PRIOR TO FI:7AL VOT'c O:t 'LHE APPLIC.ITIOY.
.n~
~ . . . ~ ~ - . 1~2~~~7.. .