CC Resolution No. 1124y • ~
s
• g-x~-65
Fla No. 13~V-65
,., - - -- -
CITY COUNCIL P.LSOLU~'TC,1~ 1ti^. 112 [iR4r.""':'~3 /~ VANIANG.E 8a '.PENTA2TVE
-__. _..._ _.. _ . _~ ~~~~~V~1~___.._'
i'0 CPI~4 DXs~~IAPBRS
:~
1dHE1R1:AS, the Cit;/ Cc~uac•~1 oz' -:~~~ City c:f ~:~~p+•.rt::.no received tha
application of CEM DEVSZAPLRS __,_,_, ._.__... ____ _ .,__.._..__.
Y'or a Variancc: Cor i'ront ~,rde,~atreet _wiclths ote~ aee ma for
r ._,.~...._...._~_._.._
_e~cact details) . A18o Tentative Map Appr+oval.. ~~
_ ....__ ~ _.... - -- _.__....~ ar.1
W~N1+F,S, the applicant hrxsc.. ~, met the burden of proof
regvirecl t:o st:ppart hire Said'~~ipulic~c f;ion, nrd
WiCEFtCAS, the Planning Coinmiasion, after duly noticed piib.~.ic hear-
1ngs, has t•ecomm~:nded In favor. a~° sa:i3 Variance& Tentative Map
NOYJ, TNEF-EFORE, DE IT RESGI~VrD:
That; after careful cor,•~i.ciex~r~.tiott o~' mapn, fs~ete, exhibits and
other e~aidet~ce submitte•9 in thi:~ matLr:~, t;t~~~ at~rl.icai:ian .for the Variance
& Tentative Hiap _._ rt~,~~~xxx~c~, a.n;t 1;hc :tf.1!'i~` isL~~~
r~ercTiy- a~proti~ed~ , su~~~l~at try Lila ~t:~~-mra ~.ci~.:~ ci~n~:,tl~.~nr~ WiliCll t~xe t~Ct~~chcct
Y:e~~eL-o and rrade a part hez~r-oJ.' ag rrl:it.~.i L• "!1" .
EE YT FURTHL~,R RF.SOL~!LD:
:'hat the report of findings at;ta~~:is;i 1:::~~~~t:o are.: upprove~i and
adc+rted, ar.:i that the G'i.i:y C].et~lc b,~, t~n~1 is hhre: y, ciir~~cf'ra ro noLi£y
the Xartics a.i`i'ccted by th' .; ctec~ :.~.~rr•
PASSED AND ADOP?rD iJy tt~e C~.ty c~au :r. ~ '. ~~i the C:~ ty oC CupF:rY.3nr~,
State of California, thin 21st eia,• at` June ~, 1~ ~5, by the
following roll ca~.l vote: --~`""~"~~~~
J~YES: Councilmen; Finch, Fitzt,erald, Nael, `Stokes, Dempster
'BAYS: Councilmen: None
h~x3.STNT: Councilmen: None
A PPRGVE.O
/s/ J. Robert Dempster
tf~yur, City o2' ~apert~.rio
ATTEST
/s/ Lawxwnae K. Martin
- Fi l c: rlo , l j-V- ti5
T!,~e application fat• ;~ ._...._.___~.a~~tilce_._._.____ en t,~^,~lf or CIM Developers
shows:
2. That there are a~ ::: ia:Z. ro~,~~i ~.ionrs c;:~ exar~jtional oharacteriatics
i.n the naZuxe off' the prar::-~~tJ Lo h,. r:fi'ec;.,:cl or that it~$ location, or
it' ~ surroun3ln~;s are aura. ~s wi?.1 1.~:r~ni~. tl~n G~un::l1. tC m;:lc.e a deter-
• mir,~ti.on that a literal enfor~~r~;~cnt c,P 1,?',+.3 O~Yi.trar,~ts would rea.ilt in `~
practicril difl'irultier: oi~ unnec~F,~sa~~- hariahipa; and
2. Thit the brantir.~ of vlte a)~1~]2cation 2s n~•ceaaary C'OL' the pre-
: ~er°~~ation and en,~oyment c~' outs:st;u:~t~.',r,.l propei~t.y r1 ~ht;E3; and
• 3. That the ~rar-tir~s oi' L';1e ap~~lication t~till no L• matorislly affect
i a3vQi rely the hc~ttlth or safpLy !~~` paz•aona reaidin~ or wor•~:i.n~ in the
r,ci~hbox•hcod qf. the property s;h'cli is the oub~ect of the a~+pliro,tion,
and that tlt~: u:~e of sAid prr~p~arty In the mannor wtiiah it 3.a proposed to
Le used wi11 not be riatsriala.~s• detrimenhrzl to tI;e public tirelt'r.re r~r
in~urlour- to the value of }~-•~F,erty or i.rnprUVC~;nanta located i.n sold sur-
,' i w~t-:din~a.
.~
:~
- 2 - •.
,,~:
~;
., P -
,, ,
~1
,, .
`~~; CI~'Y 4F CITP_E_R't'1'NQ
City HF].I, X0321 South Saratoga-Sunnyyvale Ro2si
rupertizo, California U5014
'rel.eptrone: (1108; ~~~-4505
.;
RES~'~'..FJ'."ION OF TExE ~'LA~R"Y]~dd OOT+it~ffSSIJN OF TFJF CITY OF CUPER'PINO tIECOM~
~SEl'~IIv~3 THE aRAN`I'INQ t7r ~ A VARIANCE.
. 3~3$REAS, the Planning Commission of the City cf Cupertino
rece~•ared an application fors VARIANCE, as stated on page two; and
.. a'3EREAS, the applicant has mot the burden of proof rewired to
supp•o~t his said application; and
i~"~iEREAS, thz applicatiar3 shows:
3. That there arc epec3al conditions or exceptional characteris-
tics 1n the nature of t'he property to be nffeeted, or that it's loca-
tion, or it's surrounainga are such as till permit the Commit3siori to
-nake ~ d.eterminatian that g literal enfor~aement of the Ordinance would
re~~",:].t in practical difficulties or unnecessary harduh~lps; and
- ~. 't'hat the granting o#' the application j.a necessary t'or the
pre~~a:.^vatlon rjnd en,~ayment of substantirtl pt~opCrty rights; and
~ :;. That the hearings :>hoSr that the #;ranting of the applicat~.on
wilt mot mater•lally affect ac;versely the hea1L-h or safF:ty of persona
°~ resi~:slg or working in the nei~;hborhocad of the pro:er4;;f ~•"hich is the
sub; ~ : t of the ~"T~~rllcatiort, rnd that the use of said rroperty in the
mars:=:• ~ahirh It is propaaect ;o be u3ed t~~ill not be metcrisxly detri•.
k`', men~~l tU the t~~:ti]ic ~~reli'Fre or in,jurioat~ to the valve of t~roperty or
d~~ 1atQr-~•vR~ments lacy L-c.d in sai~~ s~;rrounclinE s;
1~OW, Tt{CRE~'CRtr:, DE IT Rz ::GLUED
^hat aftet~ careful consiuet•ation of maps, facts, exhibits and
- other evidence s~ibmS.tted ire this matter, the apr~lication for the
VAFt.IJ4~aCF be, ar~rt t:kte rir~rne ia, hereby recomtnendt~d far approval L•a the
Cir, j ~:a~,".ncil of thF? City of C"JpCrtino for F.ppropriate action, subject
1: ,, t: e conditions stated on n2ge to-o; and
IT M1RTtififi ItLSOLVED
r 'c'hat the aforementiurred find{ ngc~ ate approved rnd alopted, and
~ that the :3ec:retary be, i~nd :ls hereby, directed to notify the parties
affe-~~t~~ed by thi:~ ducir3ion.
~, (co t.is:ued on page 2)
~ ~l~
~ ~~ '
r 9 ~-
.~
Mr .2 !C ,~ ; tip.:~ ~t ~ ,
,c~,