Ordinance 1136• ORDINANCE N0. 1.136 •
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AMENDING SECTION 6,4 OF ORDINANCE
NO. 652 PERTAINING TO PROCEDllRES IN THE DUITTERS OF A.'~fEND1I:G THE GENERAL
PT.AN, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL, ZONING MAP>
FROCEDURES IN THE MATTER OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AND VARIANCES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: AMENDMENT
Section 1.1: Ordinance No. 652 is hereby amended ae set forth in this
ordinance No. 1136.
SECTION 2: REPEALING CLAUSE
Section 2.1: Section 6.4 of Ordinance No. 652 is hereby repealed and
re-enacted as follows:
Section 6.4: Expiration: In any case where a conditional use permit has not
been used within a twenty-four (24) month period after date of granting thereof (or
within such other period of time which may be prescribed in pezmit or within any
extension Rranted pursuant to this section), then, without further action, the
permit shall automatically expire. A permit shall be deemed to have been "used"
when actual, substantial and continuous activity has taken place upon the land
pursuant to the permit or, in the event of the erection of a structure or structures,
when sufficient building activity has occurred and continues to occur in a diligent
manner. Prior to the automatic expiration, the Planning Commission may review a
request by tiie applicant for an extension of time to initiate said use permit.
The Commission shall have the authority to extend the time limit as a condition
in the issuance of the conditional use permit. A public hearing ie not. required
to reviea• the extension of muse permit.
INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino
this 20th day of October 1981, and ENACTED at a regular meeting
of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 2nd day of November ,
1981, by the following vote:
Vote: Members of the City Council
AYES: Johnson, Plungy, Rogers, Gatto
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sparks
ABSTAIN: None
~e~TTEST:
~PutY Cit Cle
APPRO
Mayor, City of upertino