DRC 12-06-07Design Review Committee
December 6, 2007
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
APPROVED MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW
COMMITTEE HELD ON December 6, 2007
ROLL CALL
Committee Members present:
Committee Members absent:
Staff present:
Staff absent:
Marty Miller, Chairperson
Lisa Giefer, Commissioner
David Kaneda
Colin Jung
None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
November 15, 2007
Minutes of the November 15, 2007 Design Review Committee meeting were approved
by Chairperson Miller at the meeting and by Commissioner Wong via email
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
None
POSTPONEMENTS/REMOVAL FROM CALENDAR:
None
ORAL COMMUNICATION:
None
CONSENT CALENDAR:
None
PUBLIC HEARING:
1. Application No.(s):
Applicant:
Location:
DIR-2007-33
Karen Ngo
10495 N. De Anza Blvd
Director's Minor Modification to a Architectural and Site Approval (ASA-2006-
16) with a referral to the Design Review Committee to remove a driveway
located on the north property line of an approved office building .under
construction
Design Reviez~~ Committee decision final unless appealed.
2 Design Review Committee
December 6, 2007
Staff member Jung explained a parking garage was approved last year (exhibit B). The
driveway in question is the rear access drive leaving the parking structure left or right
out to Mariam Avenue. There is a private ingress/ egress easement between the two
adjoining property owners allowing mutual access and parking. There is a lack of
agreement between the property owners regarding the road maintenance in the
easement. It is due to this disagreement, that the applicant is requesting a modification
in the driveway design (exhibit A). The new proposed driveway design has eliminated
the rear drive access right exit onto Mariam Avenue. All cars leaving the parking
structure in this direction will have to turn left onto Mariam Avenue. Staff did not
originally support this modification, as it would force many more cars onto the Mariam
Business Center's property. The applicant has refined their design, placing a Mariani-
exiting rear driveway entirely on the Sand Hill property. (Exhibit A1). Staff and the
Public Works department have reviewed this plan and support it. Staff recommends
that there be a revised landscaping plan and that a traffic circulation/directional
signage plan be part of the approval. Commissioner Giefer asked if it would be
possible to re-design the garage so that the ramp was located in a different area of the
property. Staff Member Jung explained that placing the exit ramp as suggested by
Commissioner Giefer, would impact the number of parking spaces of the adjoining
neighbor. She asked about vacating the easement agreement. The easement agreement
is a recorded private agreement and does not involve the City. The applicant, Karen
Ngo, spoke of the difficulties she had been having in trying to get the adjoining
neighbor to agree to maintenance agreement, so she had decided to re-design the access
so that the driveway is entirely on their property. Eric Hartman, the attorney for the
adjoining neighbor, Mrs. Wu, explained that his client was leery about Sand Hill
property traffic at the back of their property where they have a busy medical practice.
He feels that relocating the driveway to be on the neighbor's property would be best as
long as the traffic flow was directed properly. Mrs. Wu stated that she objected to the
modifications. She didri t feel that people would adhere to the directional signs. The
discussion continued regarding the merits between the original site plan versus the
modified site plan and other possibilities of moving the handicap ramp and/or
eliminating parking spaces or adding another driveway entrance. Commissioner Giefer
supports the site plan (Exhibit A1) as presented. She thinks that this drawing meets all
the requirements for safety. Chairperson Miller agreed with Commission Giefer. He
added that he felt the access rights onto Mariam Avenue are those of the applicant and
there is no reason to force them to place the driveway across both properties.
MOTION: Commissioner Giefer moved to approve DIR-2007-33
SECOND: Chairperson Miller
ABSENT: none
ABSTAIN: none
VOTE: 2-0
2. Application No.(s): ASA-2007-15
Applicant: Jody Chan
Location: 20289 Stevens Creek Blvd
3 Design Review Committee
December 6, 2007
Architectural and Site Approval for site modifications for a Day Care
Center/Specialized School
Design Reviez~~ Committee decision ftnal unless appealed.
Staff member Jung explained that this school was approved by the Planning
Commission at its meeting in November. The design features were referred to the
Design Review committee for review and approval prior to building permit issuance.
Enclosed in the information packet are pictures of the playground equipment. The
applicant will be modifying an existing parking area for the playground. The existing
landscaping provides the necessary privacy screening and safety concerns have been
addressed by anchoring the play area fencing in deep concrete posts. Three pipe
bollards will be installed in front of the playground fencing in the parking lot. Staff
recommends approval of the application. Commissioner Giefer asked about possibly
installing additional bollards. The applicant, Jody Chan, stated that they have been in
business for a long time and are excited about expanding their operations in Cupertino.
They designed the play area to be safe and fun for the children. Commission Giefer
suggested that the fence posts be placed closer together on the parking lot side rather
than using the pipe bollards due to the space the bollards would take up in the parking
lot. Chairperson Miller agreed with the additional condition requested by
Commissioner Giefer that rather than installing bollards, the fence posts on the parking
lot side be spaced no more than 4 feet apart.
MOTION: Commissioner Giefer moved to approve ASA-2007-15 with the added
condition regarding the fence posts be no more than 4 feet apart
SECOND: Chairperson Miller
ABSENT: none
ABSTAIN: none
VOTE: 2-0
OLD BUSINESS:
None
NEW BUSINESS:
None
Respectfully submitted:
~ ~i ?
Beth Ebben
Administrative Clerk
g:planning/DRC Committee/Minutes120607