DRC Summary 12-06-07
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308
To:
Mayor and City Council Members
Planning Commissioners
From:
Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development
Date:
December 10, 2007
Subj:
REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE FINAL DECISIONS MADE
December 6, 2007.
Chapter 19.136 of the Cupertino Municipal code provides for
A eal of decisions made b the Desi n Review Committee
1. Application
DIR-2007-33; Karen Ngo (1200 San Mateo Ave, LLC), 10495 N De Anza Blvd
Sterling Blvd.
Description
Director's Minor Modification to an Architectural and Site Approval (ASA-2006-
16) with a referral to the Design Review Committee to remove or relocate a
driveway located on the north property line of an approved office building
under construction
Action
The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0 vote. This is
effective December 6, 2007. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on
December 24,2007.
Enclosures:
Design Review Committee Report of December 6, 2007
Resolution No. 261
A pproved Plan Set .
2. Application
ASA-2007-15; Jody Chan (Legend Learning Center), 20299 Stevens Creek Blvd.
Description
Architectural and Site Approval for site modifications for a Day Care
Center/Specialized School
Action
The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0 vote. This is
effective December 6, 2007. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on
December 24, 2007.
Enclosures:
Design Review Committee Report of December 6, 2007
Resolution No. 262
Approved Plan Set
G:planning/Drcj120607 summaryletter.doc
To:
From:
Subject:
Location:
Design Review Committee
Colin J ung, Senior Planner
Application: DIR-2007-33
10495 De Anza Boulevard
Date: December 6, 2007
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Director's Minor Modification to a Architectural and Site Approval (ASA-2006-16) with
a referral to the Design Review Committee to remove or relocate a proposed driveway
located on the north property line of an approved office building under construction.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee (DRC) approve the Director's
Minor Modification for a relocated rear driveway labeled Revision" A-1" in accordance
with the model resolution.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant Karen Ngo, representing 1200 San Mateo Avenue LLC, had originally
requested a Minor Modification of ASA-2006-16 to delete a secondary driveway from an
approved parking structure for an office building that is under construction (Exhibit A-
1).
Staff requested a continuance of the application to the next DRC hearing date at the
request of the applicant and notified the interested, adjacent property owner who did
not attend the meeting. The DRC elected to review the application in order to
familiarize themselves with the project and requested additional information. DRC
took no action and continued the hearing to December 6, 2007.
The applicant presented a revised plan with a relocated driveway that was entirely on
the applicant's property. Staff indicated that it had no opportunity to review this
revised plan and could not respond until the next DRC meeting.
At DRC's request, the minutes for the DRC-approval of the parking structure (file no.
ASA-2006-16) are presented in Exhibit B-1.
DISCUSSION:
Staff's main concern with the original modification was the maintenance of a secondary
driveway access from the rear exit of the parking structure. Staff felt a driveway was
necessary to prevent unnecessary traffic flows across the neighbor's property to the
rear.
The applicant has addressed staff's concern by relocating the secondary driveway
entirely on his property. Planning and Public Works staff have revised the applicant's
I-I
DIR-2007-33
Karen N go
December 6, 2007
Page 2
design and recommends approval of Revision A-I. The design avoids driveway
entry / parking conflicts and is 32 feet wide, which is a safer width for two-way vehicle
circulation. The design also preserves existing street trees on Mariani Avenue and the
onsite parking inventory to that required by the City parking ordinance.
Staff has conditioned the approval with two conditions:
1) Applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan and storm drainage/utility plan
for the areas affected by the driveway relocation to be approved by the Director
of Community Development and Director of Public Works, respectively.
2) Applicant shall submit a traffic circulation signage plan for the garage to be
approved by the Director of Public Works.
Prepared by:
Approved by:
Colin J ung, Senior Planner 17"
Ciddy Wordell, City Planner ~~ Ulc~
Enclosures:
Model Resolution with Revision A-I
Exhibit A-I: DRC staff report dated November 15,2007
Exhibit B-1: Sept. 21,2006 DRC Minutes for file no. ASA-2006-16
G: cupnt/planning/DRC/staff rep/2006/DIR-2007-33 SR rev.doc
/-;?
DIR-2007-33
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A DIRECTOR'S MINOR MODIFICATION REFERRAL TO
AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL (FILE NO. ASA-2006-16)
TO RELOCATE A DRIVEWAY LOCATED ON THE NORTH PROVERTY
LINE ON AN APPROVED OFFICE BUILDING UNDER
CONSTRUCTION AT 10495 NORTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
DIR-2007-33
Karen Ngo (1200 San Mateo Avenue LLC)
10495 North De Anza Boulevard
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received a referral
of an application for a Director's Minor Modification, as described in this Resolution;
and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the
Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has
held one or more public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and has satisfied the following requirements:
1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, general welfare or convenience; and
2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan, and
zoning ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application no. DIR-2007-33, is hereby approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
/-3
Resolution No.
Page 2
DIR-2007-33
December 6, 2007
DIR-2007-33 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of
November 15, 2007 and December 6, 2007 are incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on the exhibit titled "Revision A-1", except as may be amended
by conditions in this resolution.
2. REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN AND STORM DRAINAGE/UTILITY PLAN
Prior to building occupancy, the applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan
and storm drainage/ utility plan for the areas affected by the driveway relocation to
be approved by the Director of Community Development and Director of Public
Works respectively.
3. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION SIGN AGE PLAN FOR THE PARKING STRUCTURE
Prior to building occupancy, the applicant shall submit a traffic circulation signage
plan for the garage to be approved by the Director of Public Works.
4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written
notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that
the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December 2007, at a Regular Meeting of the
Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
,-4
Resolution No.
Page 3
DIR-2007-33
December 6, 2007
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Cidd Y Wordell
City Planner
David Kaneda, Chair
Design Review Committee
G: GroupsjPlanningjDRCjresj2007 jDIR-2007-33 res.doc
1-5
f(e\)IlLsi t7v\ A-1-
'"f
-
REMOVE (E)
ENTRY + REPlACE
--." ~r ~\.A.' .r.~I_I-.Y
31 'I __.!~-c__.- ._~,_.-"'---"""'.'- ~-".,....
~c"''''''''''. *:! .
eM ,..........u!'a.. : N~I ;~ l...! ;-;~1-"
tit oPOL.- I,)II"JGUt;..;;;_ I t, / .'
!;i;:J., .-- s;E. lm_ , I"i h'...;
. . ~;
~---=========--========I\7fARI AN I A
- -.--- - -- ~ - -
:ONC.
WAlK ~ e'.;,:
;12'
1 (N) ENTRY f
. 1
REMO\IE (E)
ENTRY -+- REPL6.CE
STREET WN..KWAY ~ - -
L' \~-
. \ ~
"
~ELOCA TE
:) STALLS
I ,~~'
J;'
1
i
r-.~.
-'r--.'''""~~'
t- ..,. .---
1..--:Bi..:.......:: -",
--
--
+
j
!!I
:nlC '!Ue-..
~
~--',
\
.&,.:
~
W'-s-\ ~
\ .:: ~
=
=FICE
'"\
two -
< ,
! A'!
!
!
/tUGHT 80LLARDS
1 (L-5)
F'
i
!
___------1
I
i
.R
,--tL
-~-.......
..~
()
\\IiL,;<./\11.:
\"\ L h';;: E-
Exhibit A - i
To:
From:
Subject:
Location:
Design Review Committee
Colin Jung, Senior Planner
Application: DIR-2007-33
10495 De Anza Boulevard
Date: November 15,2007
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Director's Minor Modification to a Architectural and Site Approval (ASA-2006-16) with
a referral to the Design Review Committee to remove a proposed driveway located on
the north property line of an approved office building under construction.
Note that corrections were made to the address number of the property and the permit
that is actually being modified. All interested parties and adjacent property owners
have been noticed about this hearing.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee (DRC) deny the Director's Minor
Modification and retain the joint driveway as originally approved by the Design
Review Committee.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant Karen Ngo, representing 1200 San Mateo Avenue LLC, is requesting a
Minor Modification of ASA-2006-16 to delete a secondary driveway from an approved
parking structure for an office building that is under construction (Exhibit A).
On August 15, 2006, the City Council approved a use permit (file no. U-2006-06) for a 3-
story office building and parking structure to be located at 10495 North De Anza
Boulevard. The use permit approval required ASA approval through the DRC for the
final design of the parking structure as its proposed mass and location had negative
visual impacts on the adjacent neighboring office building (Mariani Business Center).
On September 21, 2006, DRC approved a revised parking garage design that met the
general design direction given by the City Council and was supported by the adjacent
property owner, Mariani Business Center. The approved design included a 24-foot
wide, secondary driveway toward the rear of the parking garage that accesses Mariani
Avenue (Exhibit B). Note that the driveway straddles the property line and occupies
land owned by 1200 San Mateo Avenue LLC and Mariani Business Center. 1200 San
Mateo Avenue LLC has written permission from Mariani Business Center to trespass on
its property in order to construct a portion of the driveway on Mariani Business Center
land.
1-7
DIR-2007-33
Karen N go
November 15, 2007
Page 2
DISCUSSION:
The DRC is requested to review and determine whether an approved secondary
driveway should be deleted from the previously approved plans for a parking
structure, which also affects the orientation of about a half dozen parking stalls.
Staff believes this request is being made because of the inability of the adjacent property
owners to reach a mutual agreement on private property disagreements.
DRC is not reviewing any other aspects of the design of the parking garage, which has
been approved by the City and supported by the abutting property owner.
In the past, parking and vehicular access easements were recorded against each
property (1200 San Mateo Avenue LLC and Mariani Business Center) that require each
property owner to maintain vehicle and parking accessibility for the other property
owner. In the parking structure design this has been accomplished through the rear
garage entrance (labeled "Easement Access") that opens into the Mariani Business
Center parking lot after you make a left turn out of the garage.
Removing or retaining the secondary driveway will not affect the visual mass of the
parking structure; however, staff believes it will have an adverse effect on onsite
circulation. The secondary driveway would allow garage users to enter or exit the rear
of the structure directly from Mariani Avenue. Removing the driveway, as proposed by
the applicant, would force all rear exit users to drive through the Mariani Business
Center parking lot, impacting that business, its customers and employees. Therefore,
staff is recommending denial of the minor modification.
Prepared by:
Approved by:
Colin Jung, Senior Planner
Ciddy Wordell, City Planner G~ '*'" ,,-.\0.
Enclosures:
Model Resolution
Exhibit A: Proposed Site Plan showing deletion of secondary driveway
Exhibit B: Previously Approved Site Plan with secondary driveway
G: cupntj planningjDRCj staff repj2006jDIR-2007-33 SRdoc
I~
...-" ::~ .::: ~ : ~ f.
I> I> ~ j:? FP l'J> ~~ 'G-'" -~ ---- ---- '" ~;~4=: \
~::~~' : :: :~: ::! ~~~::: !: ~_-~.. C~j==--- ~:--~-)]11 1f EU ~~.~
\.':I~0 -," ~ ~~ ~ ...,' . \ ." - -- - -- ---- - -"1 . Tl~'" o~:; l:IIiLi\'~ ~~~'r~' I l ."
i g g g< i~ ~ g g i ~ i g ~ ~ ~ n ~ d ~ a~ ..... iJ: i. ~ ==0 1;..___:____;..._-;__ -.:. ~~ : !~:; ; "Y ; l~~1 ~~~ 1"1 C~ ,::'. h
-f----- to L!.:1 ---"j\ rr..--I-jl--....-I---...\] LJi...J~~ ~ _ "I~_ _ __ I ~r. ~ '.: \"
f\ ~ (ii' ]1 ~! .? .~ P ~.' t .r.l ,r;.. r. r; S ~ aq -......... -I)r" \ - ---rr - I' r-1- -: -- -- - --: ------;- ~ /~! : I . ~~ D "---.R)(rn-~';." \i
, 1 G' . ~ ~ I I ~ , t ,r ~ ! .il i ~ rD .~_ I~,_.. \ L.___.:~.,l.-~_:J_____. ... ~~ . \ - '.1 ~ '. ,~
:L l! ~ i Hi!! H Ii d { ~ ~ --/-- . ~ ~ill':~:' '1":I':-~'~rr;;:::Sl" ...~~IT. :rflll.:.~~~~.~( ~. %i :tli~~ (-~-~{ ~~ I .
i ~ PJ,i I i ~! ,q! P n ~ ~ ~ ~ ..-~&--~' ; : < ::;::.~: '.<.~ :'..':.::: :~'_'i;;r\::.:." ....'.[:~.~:.~.: ;~::'~'., :':'::'.<':>~ i :..<:::ur~'.\{.. n ~ d~ w \. EI~ 61.' \1 ::; ~~j'"
. ~, 5. ~ ~ ~ r. - .-"... \ l-;;' :.: ::.~::~L~JSi~21;,;~~.'''':~'iG: :~.:.J;;;" ,:'.;-:~"L':""~~~.;;ki'A~-1 --~- .~ ~" ~~.._.
~ ~----- ...... ,;..:....:::...;.::..;..,.,.':, ....:.....;.';;-:.. ...-'....::'.~{.~-,..:I-:-:::-: ..-UjU II ~.'f. I> .... ,...r
P!~!lUl I~~ POH'f .,,~. ..,...':.:....::.:;...:..'...... .~...:;.:-,,:....'..:...'.."1.:.~.Ii..:.w.... '. J;ij':'''1L---.~ ':.: ....
· 'l " '~'I ,I w i1 '. '.. I i r II .~ 1 ~ . --'>;;< 2 d / : -:< .::: <--:' : .:.: :" . .....': -'" .:..., ;' .:: : .'.; ; ;'.' . :.':'-.: _.':-;'::'.; .r,; : :;'. ; .:'1l'-: .:' ~...., III '\,. ,.<.r~1 i1.,) . "'. \". .
iff:~f,&!gf HI i 'fr~di .~ d~:F'--: .........:..,':..:....~...:..::.:..:...:.:..........:--..,:.~...:,>,.[:..'::-:)...::.:~.::.......---'~I -~: )r~ '1 ~.:
~ij~.l..r!,~ ~ ~ n'" .,..- { ,......~.....-"-..~.---'-o,~~........:---,.-!-;.---;'t.--_.. "'-"""'-1" ----.r--r co .:11 ""', -
u ~ .; i" "i · i .....' . l't' . '. '1-'. ........... -' .. ~".. '.' , . . .-- ..' III . 'U r.: 'Jlli::
I 3 ,. r~ [ ..__u r ~t . " :.". . :.... : ':.: ';' I:" ....1...",. ..:.:.'.;:: :'. ,':.. .:..,~~ :;'!i: '.01':: ;.. '~I 'r""" 'J;mir..... "'"'"
,~ .J' ~ -.' ~ ~., .'. ',.: ..,1..:.1'.,....: ."........ ~:.. ~~ ~----"I- r, i\!,;
'-../! ~ ' -.AC_il~ ...:....,..... .......,.....:. :....-.-' "L............,= I' ')!~r '"
u ~ , I "'\~ rJJ ,.... :.... 'i.. .:,....... .. ;.... .,.. ........ \~.,.. '.' .' os .... I v"".
'w~r.:, ,~.,~=~.~:.I\IE,'='~'"'' v :.:<.~."~"'^.'I.:;.. :;.:..:.:" "'<l.~.:1.'.1..' .' ":1 .,,~ M.' ~~_..~ \,,". ~Iri; i'i ':',
.. .. ..,r'. ~:~..",'~ ,. i."".~ 'd .. ,/
..~--..--....) ;:...:. _ _ . ..., ~"___'__ ."'!.. ~ . Ii" I -' _. :t', v .
----.-(-~.~; . :1~-\"~a ,.----.----..-------------'---- v 11~ .'{~ ) ~l\g / ,f~
.--..,_.~~! \~~ 1'\ ~ ~ ~- LY-t .~~\ \(0 I EI~
~ -"':J-'''--.t~~;. ,:=tii~~~!~ '-"---. ........--.[...----.-----.....-..[--'..... --...----1\- --.--.-----.... ill. ~:~IS~TI~::: I_~m----:~~~\\ 1 .~
m ./-- '-;1 ::>':, I ~:~ fi r w ~~- \
~~\[:ii'<:" I._.,~ ..... ___ . - -....---1-- L_ .--.---.----. ~> '-.. 5 '" '-"'-1\ 1\
L<:iD' ." ~ '\...... 7 !.:!,~ I
~ -c::p ~":-:c' /, l' /', " E'- i~ ~~E~I . :l~~ ~ ~::; I
~ :. E.u,~ ." ~~~~ ~~ E9 . ~~. l:~ -.~.. :"\ \~. ::".i 'IP!~
f. ' 1 i ~j L1 u. """ I ~ 1\
-.--('-' 1.....--1-..). 4 /1----...... . - ~~~>>.~'~~.. .~~::~ . I~--_Jf~~k..,... \ :.ct..::' --A.':'~
. 1_ I~i.~ _.b ~~ ..... l~~~ 1~-7-J.-.2yJIf-7(::~- ,"-.( } lJl~Ij:~.
"'ii" ~ -- .-,-\-,r-::::1-'\--r..l+ r o'rr\- Ll". mm ., ....to;'" .=rtt.. . . . ~~. '..., :1" .' ~..ll '." "."
q ).D ~ _ . __ d:;yJ 91' r.J~ - . !!!JJl\' '.,(j.<~ . ;:;., .'.. -"- ~ ":: -- . -";;;7 -..;:; "..,1/""11-: '. 'r: -L' ~
I, "\ ~; ---- ~ l--;~M = ----l>=f,~~€~!:E~ @~ f 8' II; ~t~ I
\ 'Ji. I 'It'lt
-a:}"l ~ _ .' II: ~c~' I I ltrlii;~;~I;~~~J\ I rJ~l21 ~ I ,! 'II..,," I - \ ~ ::::
~ -:Jj :" ~.~ .".<' i\~ t~ IIr~'~IIIII..J II *
J\ I::,i"--j ::~~ ~~, IIj~:~". ., .' ,,(~ ~~I)> I
_,. 1\ ~-:'" ';,; 1;:0= ll~.~,a..-~,,-IL~:-~::J J~::'II "~ Lu_ ~~ T>)~~ - - 1<" \
"u. t. ,... <; t' " { rn- .......
('D~ J. ~ EIj] E~E~ '-"~~, ~E~ ;,~ E~ J~ ~t lJ IqJ I
I ;J )II t 1.~ E~l:if~ E~~t:1 Jh..'01 , I~ I
"i' i ~ ".. -j ~~1 t~-". -, :~~l- ~i~i
( _~. ~".. r o. . . , '~~8&f ~~.~ -~: :-.\;=F~ .=~~ I dlJ
<:~; :( :; E~ E~ "E~ \ ~~,!.~, ~' .~~ :~.'\' ~ ~ ~I~~~ /'--" ~ : I I I
( ~ \' : r: .]1 ' If" .~~ . -'~'~,~' ,'~~" ~:) " '--- :!-~U' - g"'~] I \
II UJ :J1 't Ii'" . IfR!, n -~. M )f --vrl~~~"l -
. I~r __ .. ..' '" .--', ~~t;~ ::;;:-, '.J.' ~ .~ . -- L"'", .;: - I I
'!t~:;: II\:... - ,. 1- ~'l! . , "'.-:".. "\ d~r'l - ~.' .;-J- I I
-D,-. r:.':.]-' '.. . . ... . "' \.. e. .... ,....;.. .". .. .. .. ..
~ ~ .J -'~-\\ F-:-.' '''''1/ vii ,.~t-\. . '\';'-,: " i' "V". .::"::.~:J."
- ----_~\::.:[k \i\? W I. ~ '->.~ . .' oJ' '.><:. '.' ~~ ;p:.):)~~::' I I
0_'''''.._.' " '5;: ),......o~ . .' . ........ ...... ......l...... I I
-~~ .~). r ..~1. .W .':'.. ,-., - ,/."^ .; :..:i; 1~~f.~ ~ ::/:XI[::/ /( I I
;;~c__~n.,..,~_~;/ ,l:jp~~.~:~>>.~::!..:-. '. ~,,- ~ ___' .:-.:'::-:~. ".:.>;:., '~:...-.. :::.(~0H~::E~J.::._.'
D~'I--"'-- ~W....I(B+"""'-"'" "...... ... -..-.-...--....... .. ~?:;~.... / q II I
~. ~~ -:17" ~.;~I~~H~~~~??d0~S~++~:0fS.:t~~::~::-:::~:~~:;:L}:.::..::.'/;TYY:' U. j <i'~I"::\ I
.~i'~~::~~' . . '1:":/~IL~:illtlli2~~~.../; fJ!! -LJ
~:;-.:-.:..:.0.1'l~
~ ~ ......- ~~.._~,........,...,,~
~~~}G
~~
, , U
,d ~ ~ ,~
S
n ~ ~
~
ij
Jf
! P \
1I l ~ I
~ I ~ ~
i I J
. ~ t
n-
o.
nIt
~.p i
!' ~
. t .
to .~
i r. r. r.
i 19 i
~ I~ IK l~
en
n
~
f1l
>--'
;;~Iql
fi u. it '
J: ~ ::I ~i
ill III E. U
1;1. \J~ 9- bt
0-1 U' ~
~ ~ ~ ~
fl-" . 3
Th t'I. \..1
(1 E -
:.r Ql _
"' ..
~~ ~ 1&
" U
r. :I 0
~ ~ i
ill rj I~
~ II
9 ~ if
U It
Ii -, E
U ~. 8
ID ~ U
1l r; ~
D. I~ f)
ill' ;r
" E
!l \1 "
~ ~ ~
~ ;; ~
,."...
U 0 ::.
. " ,
6 ti ~
ij;'1! Ii
D' U
t2 S. ~.
n.~
11' :i'
III II
-Il ~
U
II
>--'
0--.
o
D> l'J>
D>
'l:~\
llIII"
II:;, Z.
If;;' w
~
~
",~'.
,
"
...
,,,>
~ ~
e 1
~
~
~
I'\lDI=<..rl=r-OI:.... 75'..1\1 Z.7\S.t:\7I.T:----
'- + 0 )> .tP ~Il ~iii1 ;- ':r>-n
-lJ' In D Ul D D '. ~,.. fl ~
:r -. " 91 0 II >: iil !AJ rn
." IJJ IJJ [J' :" ..~11
'~ '" 5 !if P! :U: :< GJ =I~ :J i i "
IU ): -'....lr~ ~
,-, '" '3' ()~ L---
'" w Z <0 _.~ :-;~lC;~O ~ ~H P,> [l mffl
'" "'.0
'''; z 0 -I ~@~ " om. ~.:..' ~ ~ ,I..... ..-
" '" .....~--..J ~~~l'~\JjUq - t:::1 --~
j[
~, ----- (JJ r' ~ Cl f.J 'U [;~> ./
r :~ J- 0 JgrnO I.""Q 'U ,J ~ o. to. Ur; u
.p- c "'. ~ ;J
9 0 0 f It if tu ;:J , D
" ~~ '" )> c epee if d L ~.:"1. ~ nt Uq ~~~ ~. (J
~ 00 uo II "(J ::J <' ~ i ~~ ~
! FI '-' \0 -.:J ~t ~ ~ ~~ r-3Z
0 m ;1 tT H~ - ...~.-t-~
n. r-l- l~ ~ ~ C
::J Q) i~in I
s .0 0 ~Q
.. m.t:
0 :J ::i .
?
)> (0 tD ~
'< ~~
- ".
, -'t-.., ._/
.
~
]11111;R~".;Jr
u. ~ 1;1 tr .
. ,. 0G0 " G,' @@ ~
~~~~~~~H~~~
.......... ......
'J}JJ11Jr~CI
'rlllil!Ql1e
~ I I I i I ! f, i,
ill',' ~ u ..L 1 I
~eJ.q~ l{i~
!un~ .!a
~~~.~ qi
e_ '
----
f.' ''',' '~'P J ~ 1 q
~ it nn~t~~\;v
. ~~'~'~rl'
~ ~ ""~i\.5.ii~
f . ~ i '
~
~
g
II
,I
~II
,~
~
~GJ
IT>
~
ro
H
p)
I--'
r"
ne~
o U =
;J O'U
~ u. i"b
11 ,. it
~ ~ :
[i11lfi.
-'U
11 If..
~t~ ~.
U.:!W
~ U ~
tll """' \~
:3 Ie Il-
l] ~ 1/1
~~~
h
:J tr
l~ "
u' .
il.~
E U.
8lI.
u. .
E ;J
", u.
~ 3
i; !:,
~11
H
D' It
-U E
'Ur:
.. ;r
11_,
~ l~
It'"
\1
-H
~
~ ~l ~r.
fi. ~ [~
~ t3 n \1
'1],. ~ Ol-n
... it III
Q. D. ;r
H ~11.
n&.p,
& ~ :lIT
G ~ ~.~
U' u. U ll.
ID ~ ~ [
;] \J ,-
~~1l~
~;; ~ ~
U. II "\l.
~.' Itill
~ \) It-u
~ ~ i \
IJ 1/1 ':l
l~ {} tJ,lU
,. U. 10 o.
o-u It fi.
; Ii \ll]
5' u. ~. ill
. \I':J
-I ~ ___
~ ~ qill
!"~. -\.11 iJ
11 R ifL'
\'l n~ U. ID
.-1 I' r--i
U . lb
5' }... x_
,
"
E
\] U" IJ1
., lC \t
~ ijl'D
~ 3)
I'll lll~.
~ \11~
:l 0....
! ~ ~
. ~ U
" ,
u ~:
bl l) II
::J 1I \J
U. n. \)
'p
~ . Lr
U \.1.u:
~ r. ~
~ ~ ~
-' .... ,-
U \1'!
~ \}' S
. 00
Ii';>
-. [\
~ '"
~[
\I \11
'U"
_I I"
~ 0
" Ii'
~l n.
~i\.
.. \1
u..f
z
o
ri"
IT>
(J)
..
;J
U
11
'"
'I]
5'
If!
it
11
'"
11
~.
It
'\]1;
\I Lr
U
< .
u. ~
!:. ~
U'I]
::I ~
GeNERAL
STATS
SITE AJiiEk
BLDG. AREA:
FLOORS:
FAA:
PARKING
REQ'tl:
6Q,QO:l SF (20.ooo/Fl.R)
3
.83
211 ST.'I!..l.S (3.5/1000 sF)
C1 PER 2BS sF')
.1 SF
,...058 ACRES)
DE ANZA REQ'O SEIBACK: SO'
CONS11lUCI1ON TYPO:
!w;1C:
t.tlJLn-STO~
SPRlNKl.ERED:
2 SlDE-\'ARI:lS:
V-1 HOUR
14,000 SF
zs,OOOSF
56.000 SF
84.000 SF
(!\l.LOWAll~
B (Or-'"FlCE)
ffiOPOSED:
loT G!WlE 60 STAllS
SIR1lc:r. . . 164 STAllS
PROPOSED: 21... STAU..S {3.6/1000 Sf)
PARI(IoI;:' S1Rucr. AREIe 55,740 SF
OCCUPANC'1':
It.. J~ ('1 \ r\ r -. .. ~ ~.. t f
_ ~:'!q' ~ ~ J~ "" ~t1I ~ , ''IJ ~~. V\} t1 .\.~~
REMOVE (E)
SIDEWALK
//-----------{~~~~-- -
/
/
I
I
I
1 'Il 50 STALLS
1 at'"
I
I
I ~ 6
I -
I
: 7
\
I --
J I
\ eSEI.IENT ,_ -'
I IACC"J>S ..
I I
I '6 ~
\ I"~~
J
I
\
\
I
PPROVAL
\
I
Rei :
I
I
natute
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
\
-r
=t\=. - .
-
I
/
(
Application Number 20 sr~ r,
q aa:fn >>_ ,
-;21- _ . ,,'
~ Date
~an~.
~ SITE PLAN
~
SCALE: '"=20'
GbJlAGE> 154 SPACES
CD StTE SECTION
~
SCALE: '"=20'
---
---
---
---
-----'22-SfAlIS
I'Ia7HB~2111~
.-' '. ,\ ''-\
~ )'1'; \ './', . ..-'.,'~
i--,J\!if..J!1
I OFFICE I
RO:lf'HFJllIlT:'2IT~
OFFICE
1
lJIARIANI AYENU~_______~
REMo,\'E(E)------------------- .(':,.--
EHm"r' + REPlACE d
WA!.KW~:f\ ----------------- y-
;1
III'
.,
I~~............."...
---;. - .:.'::.':.:;:',",'; : :;':'. ::":"'::':~;1"
\\ )\"j) "':::':::.-.:
......' ......
\
j --- _../
1----
~~;A!It n;Alil u;A5tl
"' fi7 1'1' \
~
:r~
~t~
'f~E;~~~I'
.;:'.....
,~
';:>~~':.:.'::
.... J .....J;;.. ..
i:....'..............:.......'.....:.I.~.~
,......,.. :.....::.'! I
;,';', .. - ':.',,:: :.~' .'_:. :
..\ ',...,.............
. ....':::\'.i:;.'.(:.:'"
~
r He-!f-
~L~
~r/I He
11
~
...
49'lf-
i
I--
I--
1~=~~~~=;~ I~'"
~______"=o-..J
-..-
1IIl""""
""'"
lor ""'"
----~
I
I
[nl
I ) 1
I I j
. I I I
I I I
Ci I I I
to I 1 I
~ I I ]
j I i
~ I I I
I I I
I I I
o I I I
rl
1 I I
o I I I
I I I
Z I I I
I I I
I I I
I 1 I
I I I
j I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
~
Allr" k' " _,..~r
. ,I.. .:) i "iGu3
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
\
J
)
I
t
Re.'.
Des~.rip. Date By
MCH. IIJ)Q. ~E.W 5121/OS
D-:::3JGN SUBIEJ1Jlt. -+/25/M
~~-
CWl.lOE 1lE.VSON ~. "
,Any Mountain
Office Building
Cupertino, CA
Drl!Iwing TrlIa:
SITE PLAN
(SCHEME B)
A40165
3/29/0li
ASNOiEi5
A1
CopJri\tit 2llO6 '1>, ClKmg ArdJ~ Ino.
it
_J
Exhibit B - :
2
Design Review Comn_
September 21, 2006
xplained that that particular application did not have an enlarged fascia along the entire edge
o e canopy. They just wanted to put a large sign on the canopy without incorporating it into
the res the roofline. Chuck E. Cheese's parapet design was specifically done to allow for the
enlarged sp e for the logo. Commissioner Saadati also asked about the other signs proposed
around the bui . . Chairperson Giefer asked about the height of the top of the proposed sign
in comparison to the eight of the equipment screen on the roof and about the material to be
used in the tubing to ill . ate the sign. The applicant stated that all the proposed signage for
the site is 10 square feet unde hat is allowed per the sign ordinance. The larger logo sign (84
inches) is to attract the attention 0 .ttle kids. This seems to be a corporate standard for Chuck
E. Cheese. He didn't feel a logo sign 36 inches would be very visible. A resident also
expressed a concern about a seven-foot logo. being too large. She suggested a five-foot logo
sign would be better. Commissioner Saadati a thought a seven':'foot sign was too large.
Chairperson Giefer commented that the height of th roposed logo sign was more than 200%
of what is allowed and that with all the other signage t the site, seven feet is excessive.
Commission Saadati motioned for approval on the conditio at the height of the sign be
reduced to five feet. Chairperson Giefer agreed with the approval c ition to reduce the height
of the logo sign to a maximum of five feet. ~
MOTION:
SECOND:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
VOTE:
Commissioner Saadati
Chairperson Giefer
None
None
2 0
...
2.
Application:
Applicant:
Location:
ASA-2006-16.
Cliff Chang
10495 N. De Anza Blvd
Architectural and Site review for a three-level parking garage for an approved new
office building
Design Review Committee decision final unless appealed
Staff member Jung explained that this application being heard before the Committee because
the City Council at its August 15, 2006 meeting had some concerns about the garage designs
having a negative impact on the neighboring building. In their conditions of approval, the
Council has requested that the revised plans be approved by the Design Review Committee.
Staff member Jung mentioned several different design proposals. The key design element is to
have a greater separation between the garage and the neighboring, Mariani Business Center.
The applicant has proposed different types of climbing plants to be used as screening around
the structure. The access ramp has been redesigned per the City Council's directive to be inside
the garage. Chairperson Giefer confirmed the number of parking spaces inside the structure
and the way the cars will face inside the parking garage. The applicant stated that feel they have
complied with the Council's requests in their redesign. They have reviewed the new plans with
their neighbors prior to submittal. The owner of the Mariani Business Center expressed a
concern about traffic in the area but said she liked the new parking structure design. The
applicant was reminded that the lighting around the site should be pointed down.
Commissioner Saadati said he liked the garage and he felt the applicant had addressed the City
Council's COnCelTIS. Chairperson Giefer agreed.
1-/1
3
Design Review Committee
September 21,2006
MOTION:
SECOND:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
VOTE:
Commissioner Saadati
Chairperson Giefer
None
None
2-0
Application:
Applicant:
Location:
KCR Development, Inc. (Evershine)
19770 Stevens Creek Blvd
arketplace Shopping Center palm tree replacement plan
Design Review ommittee decision final unless appealed
Staff member Cha explained that this application is being re-:-heard before the Committee as a
follow up to the mee. g of June 21, 2006 asking for confirmation by the City's arborist that the
palm trees the applican roposes to plant along the driveway entrance will be able to survive
in the existing planting ar . Staff met with the City's arborist at the site. He confirmed that the
Mexican Fan palm trees will rvive where the applicant plans to put them. Minor architectural
changes will need to be done the sidewalk and nearby building roof eave to accommodate
future tree growth. One of the c~ditions of the replanting proposal will be to have the trees
designated as historical and a cove t will be recorded with the property deed to protect the
trees from removal in the future. property owner suggested that the trees be planted
differently than shown on the plans so at they will not ultimately interfere with utility lines
located along the entrance driveway and ilding. Chairperson Giefer stated that the Design
Review Committee would have to refer the a lication back to the Planning Commission if they
now wanted to plant the palm trees someplace ther than along the entrance drive. The intent
of this replanting plan is to replace the trees ba where they came from and restoring the
historical vista as much as possible. Staff member ao explained that the applicant is aware
that they will need to file for a new application and be heard by the City Council if they wish
to change the planting site. The Design Review Commi e members agreed that the current
planting plan and tree specie proposed do conform to e City Council's intent for the
development plan of the shopping center.
4.
Application:
Applicant:
Location:
ASA-2006-05 .
Timothy Reeves (Public Storage)
20565 Valley Green Drive
NEW BUSINESS:
Architectural and Site review of revised elevation and landscape plans fo
square foot, four story storage building
Design Review Committee decision final unless appealed
Staff member Honda explained that the application is being heard before the Committee as
City Council has asked for the Design Review Committee to review the revised landscape and
architectural plans of an approved public storage facility. The applicant has made several
changes in order to address the conditions of approval directed by the City Council. Staff
mGlnb8r Hands li~ted tbe conditioIl~ that b<;1ve been met ;ATith tbe Ch::mgpc; ;n thP rpv;c;pci
~
1"/ a
DIR-2007-33
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 261
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A DIRECTOR'S MINOR MODIFICATION REFERRAL TO AN
ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL (FILE NO. ASA-2006-16) TO
RELOCATE A DRNEW A Y LOCATED ON THE NORTH PROVERTY LINE ON
AN APPROVED OFFICE BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION AT 10495
NORTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
DIR-2007-33
Karen Ngo (1200 San Mateo Avenue LLC)
10495 North De Anza Boulevard
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received a referral of an
application for a Director's Minor Modification, as described in this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has held one or more
public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and
has satisfied the following requirements:
1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property
or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience; and
2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan, and
zoning ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted
in this matter, the application no. DIR-2007-33, is hereby approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are
based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
DIR-2007-33 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of November
15,2007 and December 6, 2007 are incorporated by reference herein.
Resolution No. DIR-2007-33 December 6, 2007
Page 2
SECTION lll: CONlJITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT. AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on the exhibit titled "Revision A-1", except as may be amended by
conditions in this resolution.
2. REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN AND STORM DRAINAGE/UTILITY PLAN
Prior to building occupancy, the applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan and storm
drainage/utility plan for the areas affected by the driveway relocation to be approved by
the Director of Community Development and Director of Public Works respectively.
3. TRAFFIC CIRCULATION SIGNAGE PLAN FOR THE PARKING STRUCTURE
Prior to building occupancy, the applicant shall submit a traffic circulation signage plan for
the garage to be approved by the Director of Public Works.
4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERV A TIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government
Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the
amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions.
You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest
these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying
with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December 2007, at a Regular Meeting of the Design
Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller, Giefer
COMMISSIONERS: none
COMMISSIONERS: none
COMMISSIONERS: Kaneda
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
/s/Ciddy Wordell
Ciddy Wordell
City Planner
Is/Marty Miller
Marty Miller, Chair
Design Review Committee
G: GroupsjPlanningj DRCjresj 2007 jDIR-2007-33 res.doc
c.e.vt~ leE
32'
,
"
-<
: ..... -~T' j....u:~. '.J . \'In~ . \ . .. .
. '. ..' . 7'" '. ..... . .~
_ _ ---.._ ,..... ... .-:',. v.-:', :.... .;..,.....:.......:.;.! ;.:'.
, -
--- P.
eD
I
___ _ n
;.,
11 ~
93' -6" I REMOVABLE 4
STALLS 0 8'-6" EACH ~ BOLlARD (ii)
BOLlARD, TYP.
25'-6" 102' -8" 1'-5 9/16" , .'f
~ !Xl
24' 0
u==~~
N~,~,
f1..J QA\ J ~
. V."'. "."'. 'I. "V L
f<. ~!: I , ( ,.1""-. I:j'-['
-' '" \.<-0' \ ' , \ r<..
32'
1 (N) ENTRY f
REMOVE (E)
ENTRY + REPLACE _ _ _
STREET WALKWAY ~ J.:\.
4' \ ~
Mo.r\ ~V\ \
~\}Slr4,55
16'
~
1m
HC
:oJ
;i!
;.,~ ~I 16' 4
. I -$6
"" ,VHC '"'2
~ k'
. - - ;.,~I --m/7~///
:z:
~
lex':>!
3
Hcl
~
r"E7
-I-
&
tl
ww
;..
~
~~G
ffi
, ,III /tLlGHT SOLLARDS
TIIf' I (L-5)
g ^
I~
I
rl
II
II
~
I
=Jrv
&.
~
~r
II
I
HC II &
II
II
II
~
I I n ~t 1, . -..;/':.>:~\.\:))"X_\~\~.
:: ~ - ~.;<;.<>//.'~':,';;'i~/ ~
I I. ',' ..........., . . .
- . ,= '_ ,.....:_::.:)'.....::\:;"~.,\.C
APPROVAL DIre - .:JDD7 - 5~ U- _ _ _ . '.>.:..:~. '/../j':'..
Application Number . _ .: .' , . .;. . .. _ . .. . ". :....... .' . .... . :.
I .' '. .:. '.. . '. .. : " ._ ..: _. : ." :. .. ,.... '..
/.:1 ~ -()7 . . ..'... .... n. ,_. .'. .'.
. ~ _ I 1 ':'.'..:"'::':,',,:
C"f'n'~hre #. '. ..... ;". .... ". ... .... .
u. .,... c. - C ana I 1'~;1' 1 .. .. :.,>....: ~:.:.~:.:.:..: : :.~~::.:~;: ...:.;.../......;
. - " .-. - .. ,..' .: ,: . . .' ~ ....
'.....-...-.-....""..."'....."".., ....,.... '.'. '.' ".~~._,.,..,-"".'.~R:.'1. .=.....::r.:;1~~. . I -r~
~.~_..-...""._._._...~.- -.- .. . \,/" \,/"
1a...
I I 1 1 L /'>....1
d r~
I ,~---
'"
~
~
VINE
PLANTiR
FLUSH WI
CONC, 5
~
~
ORe
I.
""
I
iD
~ 0
Ul
I> -'
~ I I II :z:
!Xl
~
r~&
dr~
:"IIIIIII'l"l.:!~
~. . '.
:z:
RE -USE (E)
GAS METER
LOCATION
8
b
~
1'0_
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\~ II II
~ CITe 01 At\1 N
f.\
r.'\
To:
From:
Subject:
Location:
Design Review Committee
Colin J ung, Senior Planner
Application: ASA-2007 -15
20299 Stevens Creek Boulevard
Date: December 6, 2007
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Architectural and site approval for site modifications for an
approved day care center/ specialized school
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the architectural and site approval permit file no. ASA-
2007-15, per the model resolution.
BACKGROUND:
On November 13,2007, the Planning Commission approved a use permit for a day care
center/specialized school (Legend Learning Center) proposed in an existing
commercial building near the intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Vista
A veneue. The Architectural and Site Approval (ASA) application was not acted on
because of the absence of design details for the outdoor playground. The Commission
was concerned about the appearance of the playground and safety aspects as the
playground was proposed at the edge of a parking lot. The ASA was referred to the
Design Review Committee for review and approval.
DISCUSSION:
Play Structure/Equipment: The applicant, Legend Learning Center, plans on
relocating and reusing its existing play structure and rubberized play squares (Exhibit
A). The structure was measured and found to fit in the proposed playground minus
one of the slides. The play squares are a safety surface and can be laid directly on the
asphalt.
Note that the play platforms are elevated 6-7 feet. From this height there are no views
into adjacent residential yards because of intervening trees on the property that will
protect privacy (Exhibit B).
Playground Fence: The playground will be enclosed by a steel pole fence. As an extra
safety measure, the fence posts will be constructed of 3" x 3" dimensioned steel bars set
only 6 feet apart in deep concrete footings.
Note that the parking stalls are located abutting only one side of the playground. This
abutting south side parking stall is wider than the other stalls and three pipe bollards
set in concrete will be placed between the play fence and the parking stall as an extra
02 -I
ASA-2007-15
Legend Learning Center
December 6, 2007
Page 2
safety measure. The bollards are of the type used to protect utility cabinets from
vehicular collisions.
Prepared by:
Approved by:
Colin J ung, Senior Planner
Ciddy Wordell, City Planner ~ . 1 Z,7
L~:z/L-~ ~/~
Enclosures:
Model Resolution
Exhibit A: Photos of play structure and mats
Exhibit B: Photos of existing landscape screen toward residences
Plan Set
G: cupnt/planning/DRC/ staff rep/2007/ ASA-2007-15 SRdoc
c2"a
ASA-2007-15
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL FOR AN
OUTDOOR PLAYGROUND AREA FOR AN APPROVED DA YCARE
CENTER/SPECIALIZED SCHOOL AT 20299 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
ASA-2007-15
Jody Chan for Legend Learning Center
20299 Stevens Creek Boulevard
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for
an Architectural and Site Approval, as described in this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has held one or more
public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and
has satisfied the following requirements:
1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property
or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
general welfare or convenience:
2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan, and
zoning ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted
in this matter, the application no. ASA-2007-15, is hereby approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are
based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application ASA-2007-15 as set
forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of December 6, 2007, and are
incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
t2'3
Resolution No.
Page 2
EXC-2007-15
December 6, 2007
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on a plan set titled: "Legend Learning & Family Resource Center, Inc.
20269-20299 Steven's Creek Blvd., Cupertino, CA" dated 11/29/07 and consisting of two
pages labeled A1 and A2, except as may be modified by conditions contained in this
resolution.
2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government
Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the
amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions.
You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest
these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying
with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December 2007, at a Regular Meeting of the Design
Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Ciddy Wordell
City Planner
David Kaneda, Chair
Design Review Committee
G: Cupnt/Planning/DRC/Res/ ASA-2007-15 res.doc
/l~4
<
..
.-
-=
.-
-=
~
. \
I
. ':. <1
. 'I'
'~',:,," '::~~~~~
, ~4!~~;;:y', .:>.~,
*" ""~""'-'')'q", ~iOJEj"
~~~z~~~!_\> .:-'."';~~~: ,
".1' ..,~~. '~if-==~
:,-3:~';~, . .. ,~;.,;t:\
"'''''iL.:Z'-, :'~~(l/ '.' ~
. E::iI\~,~~~. . '
.~~.~ ,0 ~ ~'~'~t~.\;~~.,
.'~"'~~~r~",> / "'1 == ~~ .~.~\\ 1!'
.', ".:.. ,,' "."".3 . ..... ".
:>' "'" ~,' ,.".....~. .' II .....\ ~~~,
.' ,:-:,,}\ '; . '~lt ~'~'I -::; '\';;0;;""1';::::;;:\\:
,~. ~r' ,T: ""(",.,: 1:,?< '~Ti .~.. . - IlliIt.:,._.,.. .....':... _:
:.~~~.~~.~':[; . j':' 'I-~\.~,;~;\
'~':':~" :"j~;i: "~11i~;,t'f
';'ii' ~\lW~ ~~~;.
. .~ '~ ~ -
i.'
I
\
\
\, ,.,:;. '>fA-'
'._::}t:f
'\ ':. .r. ,~~
-,~f.t
I ., ~ ,- !;~. '{J ~'..~
-::t.. . r~
, .~ :.,
I
, -r
.if
~tj.~.t"
h,- ...
Ct -..,,1.-:
/),--5
=
-
1lI_
.&:2
.-
.:
~
d-"~
o
>
....I
OJ
~
W
w
0::
()
00
z
w
>
w
r-
OO
/
"\
[
[
TENANT NO. 1
3,144 S.F.
EXISTlNG "HEART SAVERS.
ADORESS :20269 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
(NOT PART OF "1><IS SUBMrTTAL)
20 18 ~ I I ~'1 IIQJ
--1 · ~I"'I ,'_:
___m. "' __~__'___I
I _____
I ____
L-- __
@J --
mc
RM.
~I",
"n
I
~
.
o
I
"
N
\..@
/
I
I
I ~
:r@ '--114
I
J, I ra
I
I
I
I
NOT PART OF "1><IS PROJECT D I~IIS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~OT P..j.T OF lHIS PR~ECT
EXISTING OFfICE BUILDING
NOT PART OF THIS PROJECT
L___
SCOPE OF TENANT SPACE
WITH HATCH LINE FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
24'-0.
-----
@]
./
VISTA DRIVE
~
1
7~ I~
7
I
I
~i
I I
, I
I
~r
o I
17
s
I
6 I I
___J
NOTE:
"1><IS DRAWING IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. NO SITE WORK IS REOUIRED.
EXCEPT FOR NEW (ADA) CURB RAMP
SITE PLAN .
SCALE: 1/16.=1'-0" :)
TABULATIONS
ZONING DESIGNATION
PROPERTY ADDRESS
PROPOSED USE
P (STEVENS CREEK BLVD CONCEPTUAl ZONING))
20289- 2099 STEVENS CREEK BLVD.
OUT-PATIENT MEDICAL FACILITY /SCHOOL/
O"1><ER COMMERCIAL USES
316-25-042
0.8771 AC. (38,202 SJ'.)
1998 CBC, CMC, CPC, 1996 NEC, T-24, AND ALL LOCAl
AND STATE AMENDMENT.
EXISTING BUILDING
A.P.N.
SITE AREA
CODE REFERENCE
EXISTING BUILDING AREA:
CONSTlRUCTION TYPE:
SPRINKLERED
OCCUPANCY:
PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
9,533 SJ'. (I-STORY)
V-N (EXISTlNG)
YES (1001.:)
.B. OCCUPANCY
PARKING REQUIRED
PARKING PROVIDED
ll:oTLJ"1><lslECTL Q Ll1NOTlOFLpJECT I /l (\ \
,___Jl- - [_LI_ -- _ -L[-C[_lLl _L\~__
--'-------r--~
N\ ' cl
ADDRESS :20Z79 ADDRESS :20289
STEVENS CREEK STEVENS CREEK
BLVD BLVD
TENANT NO. 2 TENANT NO. :3
1,280 S.F. 1,400 S.F.
(NOT PART 0 THIS SUBMITTAL)
~
TENANT NO.1 "HEARTSAVERS.
MEDICAL OrnCE AREA (2604 S.F.) 's STALLS PER F1LE#M-2002-03 15 STALLS
TENANT No.2
RETAlL AREA (1,280 S.F.) 1,280 SF /250 _ 5.1 STALLS
5 STALLS
TENANT No.3
MEDICAL OffiCE AREA (1,521 S.F.) 1,400 SF /175 = 8 STALLS
8 STALLS
TENANT No.4 DAY CARE
DAY CARE-50 CHILDREN 50 CHILDREN/6.5 =7 STALLS
OR-SPECIAUZEO SCHOOL-50 STUDENTS 50 STUDENTS/H2 STAFFS -14.5 STALLS ~
41 STALLS
KEY
[i]
12]
o
GJ
o
o
[2]
o
o
~
~
G
@]
@J
@]
B
~
~
@]
~
@]
~
~
@]
@]
~
~
~
~
~
21 STANDARO SPACES
18 COMPACT SPACES
2 ACCESSIBLE SPACES
4i1'5TAi:
NOTES:
EXISTING SIDEWALK
EXISTING A.C. PAVING
EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL
EXISTING ACCESSIBLE RAMP FROM A.C. PAVING
TO CONCRETE SIDEWALK
EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN
EXISTING LANDSCAPING
EXIST1NG TRASH ENCLOSURE
PROPERTY UNE
EXISTlNG EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR
EXISTING PIPE BOLLARDS
NEW 4"~ PIPE BOLLAROS. 4'-0" HIGH
NEW PARKING STALL PAINT STRIPING TO MATCH EXISTING
EXISTING PAlNT STRIPING TO REMAIN
EXISTING DRIVEWAY LOCATION
EXISTING CHAlN-UNK FENCE ENCLOSURE
EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER
EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSfORMER
EXISTING ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR PAD
EXISTlNG ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER PAD
NEW ACCESSIBLE RAMP WITH A.C. PAVING
AT 1:12 MAX. SLOPE PER cee CHAPTER llB
NEW PAlNTED PAVEMENT SYMBOL
NEW 3' WIDE BLUE PAlNTED BORDER AND STlRIPES
(AT 36" O.C.) PER cee CHAPTER llB
EXISTING SLOPE ('2% MAX) EACH DIRECTION
NEW REFLECTORIZED BLUE PARKING SIGN
PER cee CHAPTER 11 B
NEW 6'-0" HIGH W.I. FENCE ANO (3'-0. WIDE) SWING GATE WITH T.S.
3 X 3 X '/4 06'-0" O.C. SEE DETAlL A/A-2
EXISTING WALKWAY
EXISTING LANDSCAPE STRIP AND CONCRETE CURB TO REMAlN.
NEW 2'X2'X2-1/2 PADDING BLOCKS 0 PLAY AREA OR RtlLlCATE" E)(15TIIJG
PLAY AREA EQUIPMENT RELOCATED FROM <E> FACILITY.
EXISTING REDWOOD TREE TO REMAlN.
DENOTES ACCESSIBLE PA"1>< OF TRAVEl FROM
STREET OR ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE TO
PRIMARY BUILDING ENTRANCE.
REVISIONS
~ PlANNING COMMENT
~ 'O/~l/07
~ PLANNING: COMMENT
f.!.:). , 1/29/07
~~ ...J
w- OJ
~~ ~
a6 J:
Z eJ
w OJ '" ~
"''''
...J 00>
[2; ~ ::j
::l i1i::l OJ
r- N't
()'~ OJ
=> u.i ~ ~
~:.c~ "
(J)~ ~
...J~ N
Wa. ~
':;;_ 1il
...'" ...
0.... ~
<(
o
o
c
>- ~
--.J . 0.
-U:l
2Z0
<e-
LL -u
- >
~O::::CD
W~
n'\ ~ a>
'-'Za>
ZWU
ZUCI)
O::::W.c
<eU~
Wo::::a>
--.J ....,
::)(/)
000l
Zc.ng)
WWO
Gn::N
W 6
--.J <.0
N
o
N
z
::5
Q..
W
t:
(f)
DATE: 09-26-07
SCALE: AS SHOWN
DRAWN: RTC
JOB: PAT -02-07
A1
OF SHEETS
190'_5M
I ADJACENT T~NANT
~ ADJACENT TENANTl
I ADJAC~~~ENANT~
CLASS ROOM
o
20'-4- X 18'-0"
365 S.F./20-
19 OCCUPANTS
COMPUTER lAB
A
13'-0- X 12-6-
166 S.F./l00=<
2 OCCUPANTS
OFFICE
14'-6" X 9'-6-
tJ8 S.F'/IOO,.
2 OCCUPANTS
+5'-0"
ITQP"'ii'"POSf)
/TJDPOFPOSTAND~t$CN'PED
II 'N1H~'IIC.
3
-+rI-ff
OUTSIDE OF
PLAY AREA
~2r2.ornw
cf>4jCPA'
€>AlCPA'IWO,
CD FENCE SECTION
FENCE ELEVATION
([) ,,:.~~ STEEL FENCE DETAIL
COMPUTER lAB
8
12'-6" X 12-6-
160 S.F./l00""
2 OCCUPANTS
TUTORIAL RIol.
E
21'-6" X 10'-8"
231 S.F./20_
12 OCCUPANTS
~
CLASS ROOM
C
25'-8M X 14'-2-
J6J S.F./20=
19 OCCUPANTS
CLASS ROOt.!
8
1a'-r X 10'-a"
196 S.f'/20=
10 OCCUPANTS
NEW INTERIOR WALL
EXISTING WAll
C1\PLAN
\gJ
SCALE: 1/8" = "-0'
REVISIONS
^ Pl.ANN1NG COMMENT
~ 10/31/07
~ Pl..ANNING COMMENT
~ 11/29/07
1Q~ ...J
UJ~ W
~~ ~
(5< :c
ZU f3
w wlt'J :I:
If).., <
....J Om ::i:
~~~:J
::t ~lX) I.L.l
~ N cr
0........-. :J
::> w~ ~
e:::: ~~ IX)
I-- <~ I
cn~ ~
-!!?i N
UJ!l. ~
<(I-- ~ ~
'" ...
0..... ~
~
(i
0"
c
~ t
Q.)
. 0..
-U::l
LZU
<(-.
LL -ci
~ >
c::clO:::m
W.::;:.
Cll---Q)
Z Q.)
ZWU 0:::
-U 0
Z rn 0
0::: W . C --l
<( Q.) u...
WU~
--.JO:::+-,
:::)(f)
Oom
Z(f)~
WWO
Clo:::N
W 6
--.J <.D
N
0
N
REfERENCE A
NORTH V
DATE: 09-26-07
SCAlE: AS SHOWN
ORAWN: RTC
JOB: PAT -02-07
A2
OF SHEETS
ASA-2007-15
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 262
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL FOR AN
OUTDOOR PLAYGROUND AREA FOR AN APPROVED DA YCARE
CENTER/SPECIALIZED SCHOOL AT 20299 STEVENS CREEK
BOULEV ARD
SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
ASA-2007-15
Jody Chan for Legend Learning Center
20299 Stevens Creek Boulevard
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an
application for an Architectural and Site Approval, as described in this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the
Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has
held one or more public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and has satisfied the following requirements:
1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, general welfare or convenience:
2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan,
and zoning ordinance;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the application no. ASA-2007-15, is hereby approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application
Resolution No. 262
Page 2
ASA-2007-15
December 6,2007
ASA-2007-15 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of
December 6, 2007, and are incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on a plan set titled: "Legend Learning & Family Resource
Center, Inc. 20269-20299 Steven's Creek Blvd., Cupertino, CA" dated 11/29/07 and
consisting of two pages labeled Al and A2, except as may be modified by
conditions contained in this resolution.
2. PLAYGROUND
The playground fence posts shall be spaced close together, no more than four feet
on center.
3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERV A TIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d) (I), these Conditions constitute written
notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that
the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of December 2007, at a Regular Meeting of the
Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Miller, Giefer
COMMISSIONERS: none
COMMISSIONERS: none
COMMISSIONERS: Kaneda
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
/s/Ciddy Wordell
Ciddy Wordell
City Planner
/ s/Marty Miller
Marty Miller, Chair
Design Review Committee
G: CupntjPlanning/DRCjRes/ ASA-2007-15 res.doc
o
>
....J
CO
~
W
w
0::
()
en
z
w
>
w
.....
en
APPROVAL
Application Number
I :J,-I,,-O
~~t
C''',,,. .
:-"...,J
DRC
E\~."'; :.\ :;j!8
:1>"''!~-
.._~... ..- "
SCOPE OF TENANT SPACE
WITH HATCH LINE FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
r-- - ~ ~ L:l~ t t~ L - - Q - L l_l:t~l +-lLl_ [\ ~ __
--'-\-----~---;8
N ' d
I
ADDRESS :20279
STEVENS CREEK
BLVD
ADDRESS :202B9
STEVENS CREEK
BLVD
TENANT NO. I
3,144 S.F.
EXISTING "HEART SAVERS'
ADDRESS :20269 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
(NOT PART OF THIS SUBMITTAL)
TENANT NO. 2
1,2BO S.F.
TENANT NO. 3
1,400 S.I.
I
'+
I~ -
lJ. 5 I
, I
I
- --------------~
I ' -0-
I ___________~
@]'--------------- I
(NOT PART OF THIS SUBMITTAL)
r-
ELEC
RM.
~
o
I
o
N
~
/'
~T PAin OF "'S PR~ECT
24'-0"
I~
I
I
14
f
@
NOT PART OF THIS PROJECT
b~ $
EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING
NOT PART OF THIS PROJECT
L___
I
f
17
I
6 I I
-----
@]
___J
"
\.
/
VISTA DRIVE
NOTE:
THIS DRAWING IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. NO SITE WORK IS REQUIRED.
EXCEPT FOR NEW (ADA) CURB RAl.tP
SITE PLAN . SCALE: 1/16'=1'-0" e
TABULATIONS
ZONING DESIGNATION
PROPERTY ADDRESS
PROPOSED USE
P (STEVENS CREEK BLVD CONCEPTUAL ZONING))
20269-2099 STEVENS CREEK BLVD.
OUT-PATIENT MEDICAL FACILITY /SCHOOLj
OTHER CONMERCIAL USES
316-25-042
D.B771 AC. (38.202 S.F.)
1998 cse, ewc, CPC, 1998 NEC, T-24, ANO ALL LOCAL
AND STATE AUENDMENT.
EXISTING BUILDING
A.P.N.
SITE AREA
CODE REFERENCE
EXISTING BUILDING AREA:
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
SPRtNKLERED
OCCUPANCY:
PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
9,533 S.F. (I-STORY)
V-N (EXISTING)
'YES (1001.:)
"8" OCCUPANCY
PARKING REQUIRED
PARKING PROVIDED
TENANT NO.1 "HEARTSAVERS"
MEDICAL OFFICE AREA (2804 S.F.) 15 STALLS PER flLEIM-2002-03 15 STALLS
TENANT No.2
RETAIL AREA (1,280 S.F.) 1,280 SF /250 _ 5.1 STALLS 5 STALLS
TENANT No.3
MEDICAL OFFICE AREA (1,521 S.F.) 1,400 SF /175 = 8 STALLS 8 STALLS
TENANT No.4 DAY CARE
DAY CARE-50 CHILDREN 50 CHILDREN/8.5 =7 STALLS
OR-SPECIAUZED SCHOOL-50 STUDENTS 50 STUDENTS/H2 STAFFS -14.5 STALLS ~
.1 STAlLS
KEY
~
CD
o
o
o
o
12]
o
o
~
~
G
G
@]
@]
B
~
GJ
@]
GJ
~
~
@]
~
@]
~
@]
~
@]
~
21 STANDARD SPACES
18 CONPACT SPACES
2 ACCESSIBLE SPACES
4fTijj'A[
7
!-----0
@ I
fi
I
I
I
~r
G nO I
NOTES:
EXISTING SIDEWALK
EXISTING A.C. PAVING
EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL
EXISTING ACCESSIBLE RAl.tP FROM A.C. PAVING
TO CONCRETE SIDEWALK
EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN
EXISTING LANDSCAPING
EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE
PROPERTY UNE
EXISTING EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR
EXISTING PIPE BOLLARDS
NEW 4"~ PIPE 8OLLARDS. 4'-0" HIGH
NEW PARKING STALL PAINT STRIPING TO "lATCH EXISTING
EXISTING PAINT STRIPING TO REl.tAIN
EXISTING DRIVEWAY LOCATION
EXISTING CHAlN-UNK FENCE ENCLOSURE
EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER
EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER
EXISTING ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR PAD
EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER PAD
NEW ACCESSIBLE RAl.tP WITH A.C. PAVING
AT 1:12 loIAX. SLOPE PER CBC CHAPTER l1B
NEW PAINTED PAVEMENT SYMBOL
NEW 3" WIDE BLUE PAINTED BORDER AND STRIPES
(AT 38" o.c.) PER cse CHAPTER l1B
EXISTING SLOPE ('21.: loIAX) EACH DIRECTION
NEW REFLECTORIZED BLUE PARKING SIGN
PER CBC CHAPTER liB
NEW 6'-0" HIGH W.I. FENCE AND (3'-0" WIDE) SWING GATE WITH T.S.
3 X 3 X 1/4 08'-0" O.C. SEE DETAIL AjA-2
EXISTING WA1XWAY
EXISTING LANDSCAPE STRIP AND CONCRETE CURB TO REt.IAIN.
NEW 2'X2'X2-1/2 PADDING BLOCKS 0 PLAY AREA 00 RWlCAT" ..XI5TIIlG
PLAY AREA EQUIPMENT RELOCATED FROM <E> FACILITY.
EXISTING REDWOOD TREE TO REMAIN.
- - - - - - - - - - - - DENOTES ACCESSIBLE PATH Of" TRAVEL FROM
STRffi OR ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE TO
PRtIlWlY BUILDING ENTRANCE.
VICINITY MAP
REVISIONS
;;... Pl.AHNING COWWENT
L...!..1 10/31/07
~ PVHNwa COhINENT
a "/29/07
~~ -'
~;;; ~
z'" a.
a~ :I:
z l:l
w w'" ~
Vl...,
...J 0",
<t: ..,'"
0:: ~ I ::t
::> ii5 ~ ~
I- "',
u......~ '"
:>LJ~;!:
~~.:!:. ,
rn~ ~
..J~ N
wOo ~
1:;:- :g
.....'" ...
0..... ~
<(
o
o
<:
>- .-
~ 15
- . 0-
LU:J
<(ZO
LL -
-0
_'>J 0:::- 2
uu W OJ z
(.9~~::5
Z w ~ 0..
ZUU w
0::: " en t:
<( W <: (f)
WU~
~0:::2
=:)V>
0001
Z(f)(])
ww8
(.9o:::N
w I
~ (])
<.0
N
o
N
DATE: 09-26-07
SCALE: AS SHOWN
DRAWN: RTC
JOB: PAT -02-07
A1
OF SHEETS
A;~TROVAL
!"~. ",-- i""\
L:'~'1.tJ
,
'..
~rc:
ri
..:i..::.i..~~';:.' :.;s~,l.: -,~-,,;---.---- .~ >
.;,;,~..;... _ _~...,,' ,;;:-...i\,;G"c;';.;,~S~2,:..:~_......;~-.,..,;'
REVISIONS
^ PlAANING COMMENT
L.2.::i. 10/31/07
~ PlNfNlNG COMMENT
~ 11/29/07
.1'-(1"
(llJPOfPO!T)
T.!.31C3Xl/4SlLPOST
...-o-o.c. mo.
OUTSIDE OF IW-""~__B II II II II II II II II I fQ~
PLAY AREA .." o.c. T'lP. -'
UJ~ w
UJ'" !;(
zO> "-
i5tS J:
(I)
Z WtO ~
~!!l:;l :;!
iii!~
,Ir'!-. ! HHHHt+'UlJ1ll I ::l "' U
<f>A/e,........ <1:> A/C ""WlO --.. ~ N I
U"~ "'
"' ~
~ ~~ ~
~ "'
en'" '"
...J!1i N
UJ"- lO'
.'~ 3'~; ~~ ~~----t- I I I I !;;:;o 0
Q." ~
CD FENCE SECTION
FENCE ELEVATION
@ "':.~~ STEEL FENCE DETAIL
190'-'-
CLASS ROOM
o
20'-4- X 18'-O~
365 S.f./20-
19 OCCUPANTS
COt.4PUTER lAB
A
lJ'-O~ X 12-8"
166 5.F'/1oo=
2 OCCUPANTS
<(
U
o
c
>- ~
---1 . Cl.
-U:J
2ZU
<{ - "
LL .
'D
. >
c:clO::::m z
w -" :S
",f-- <ll 0...
'--'Z<ll
ZWU 0:::
-U 0
Z '" 0
0:::: W'C -!
<{ <ll l.J....
WU~
---10::::~
::)C/l
GOG)
Z(f)~
WWO
00::::N
W J,
---1 ill
N
o
N
ClASS ROOM
C
25'-8~ X 14'_2N
COMPUTER LAB
B
12'-6- X '2-8~
160 5.F./1oo_
2 OCCUPANTS
363 S,F./20=
19 OCCUPANTS
~J~CENT TENANT I
~
OfF"lCE
14'_6N X 9'_6M
138 5.F./l00.
2 OCCUPANTS
ADJACENT TENANT I
l~ACENT TENANT I
STAFF
11'-9~ X 16'_OR
laB 5.f./l00:
2 OCCUPA.NTS
TUTORIAL RM.
E
21'-6" X 10'-8"
23l S.F'/20=
12 OCCUPANTS
CIJ.SS ROOM
B
18'-J" X 10'-B"
196 S.f'/ZO=
10 OCCUPANTS
l'W.LJ.EliE/jQ
NEW INTERIOR WALL
DATE: 09-26-07
SCALE: /IS SHOWN
DRAWN: RTC
JOB: PAT -02-07
EXISTING WAll
REfERENCE A
NORTH Y
LL'\PLAN
\gJ
SCALE: l/S" = 1'-0"
A2
OF SHEETS