The URL can be used to link to this page

.03 U-2007-06 Cupertino Village CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: U-2007-06, ASA-2007-10 (EA-2007-08) Agenda Date: November 13,2007 Applicant: Brian Replinger (Cupertino Village) Location: Homestead Road and Wolf Road APPLICATION SUMMARIES: USE PERMIT and ARCHITECTURAL & SITE APPROVAL to construct two one-story retail buildings totaling 24,455 square feet and a two level parking structure. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission should take the following actions: 1. Take public input and evaluate the issues of the project; and 2. Provide feedback to the applicant and staff; and 3. Continue the item to a date certain to allow sufficient time for the applicant to respond to the Planning Commission input and provide a recommendation to the City Council. The project will be reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on November 14,2007. The Planning Commission can not take action until ERC provides findings for the environmental considerations. BACKGROUND: Kimco Realty was founded in 1960 and is the nation's largest publicly traded owner and operator of neighborhood and community shopping centers with more than 1,500 properties through out 45 states and several countries. Kimco recently acquired the Cupertino Village Shopping Center from the former owner, Sand Hill Properties Company. The Cupertino Village Shopping Center is located at the southeast corner of Homestead and Wolfe Road. The applicant, Brian Replinger of Kimco, is requesting approval to construct two one-story retail buildings and a two level parking structure at the existing shopping center. GENERAL PLAN: The project site is located in the Valko Park North area. According to the General Plan, there are only 5,341 square feet of commercial development allocation left for this area. This means that the project still needs 19,114 square feet in order to facilitate the proposed expansion. According to the General Plan Policy 2-20 (strategy 4), allocations may be redistributed from one geographical area to another if necessary and if no significant environmental impacts, particularly traffic, are identified. The applicant is requesting that the remaining 19,114 square feet of commercial square feet be Applications: U-2007-06, ASA-2007-10 (EA-2007-08) Cupertino Village S110pping Center Page 2 redistributed from the Vallco Park South area, which currently has 791,846 square feet of commercial development allocation available. DISCUSSION: Site Design The shopping center comprises three parcels wit11 seven existing retail/ commercial office buildings. Four of the main buildings are connected by an i11terior court yard system and the remaining satellite buildings are at the perimeter of the center along Wolfe Road. T11e project proposes two new retail buildings (buildiI1gs. A al1d B), 14,000 sq. ft. and 10,500 sq. ft. in size, respectively. The project also proposes to delete one of the existing driveways along Wolfe Road to accommodate Building A. Building B will be located at the southwest corner of the shopping center, approxiInately 50 feet from t11e existing apartment development (Avalon). The proposed two-level new parking garage will be located along the westerly property line acting as a buffer betweel1 the Linnet Lane residential neighborhood and the shopping center (see diagram below). ~~:~.=.:=.._==:=:'=':C~,~_._-::~'l 2-Level Parking Garage ~ ~-:-_~~" ., :~~;;..".,!;i1$~' ., .~ ";~~' ,~,,~,:f~ ...__~. n. . . ! ~Cl) EXlS1lNG 18:'P~:SfJ.U.5 lli' "~:iTo\ll..." 3li,5ll4 ar ,...l\tQN.. Ol:!CI\ I . '\ I ! .~!t7 .1 ,-~. CUPERTINO VILLAGE Neighbo1/1hood Connection Enhal1ciI1g neighborhood connectivity and creating a walkable city are guiding priI1ciples in the City of Cupertino General Plan (Guidil1g PriI1ciples 3 and 4). In additiol1, providing pedestrian access via paths and trails also enhances the community iI1terface between uses and encourages alternatives means of transportation resulting in reduced number of automobile trips (General Plan Policy 4-2, Strategy 1; Policy 5-1). Currently there are two pedestrian access points along the westerly property boundary from the adjacent residential neighbor11ood to the west (see diagram below). Applications: U-2007-06, ASA-2007-10 (EA-2007-08) Cupertino Village Shopping Center Page 3 - - - - -<~~-~ ~ - ~.-~ ~ ~'.- '~~'~'~~-':-~"-T- ~~ II r~ ~I II':J ''''-''.. /0' >", ,~,~ L,'~\j []~bll' ./,,- "'~ ~ /") I ~.,,,,^ ,,~~ ~ ] I I' - _,'ii':;J... ) ~ ' '. ,~I ~ .t:"" '.0",:\ / ~ ~~~ i """ '-', " . . ":1 .-~' ". ' ---t, f~~:;.".~~ r' ~ :::::--=---".' 'l,t: / .,; .. -'".-l _ ',:;"if/::r.:'# 'v"" . 1 :~-'~!r' . \;<I;~~,::~' ~-~ / ./ /. .. A" "'~t/- I ~--ro' I' ~ " .II, ..;;. a:: ~ t ' ;, · -"~L-'-~~.~~ ..,,';:-.....~-::~. :~<~~~~~,~~:,~,_, ,h~..~~..'.~~; . I I The project proposes to delete the access closest to the church (north.) and provide an. enhanced pedestrian. entran.ce at the center of the garage (t11rough a tun11el passage way) near mid-block of Linnet La11e where Lark Lane intersects with Lin11et Lane. A second pedestrian entry is proposed near the southwestcor11er of t11e center desig11ed to serve as a11 emergency fire truck access with break away bollards at the request of the Fire Departme11t. Tl1e proposed pedestrian access points along the westerly property boundary are desirable and consistent with the City's Ge11eral Plan goal of promoting neighborhood connectivity. fIJ2"~ a!AU.S tl)1 ~~Nt>:ST"'J.1\ Ped. Access . . -1 ..:....1 I' I .l6.S(M SF ,.HllU>I:o. (l(CI', I ,: ,I:; A1"chitt-l.-l-ul ~ " Applications: U-2007-06, ASA-2007-10 (EA-2007-08) Cupertino Village Shopping Center Page 4 The design and the general architectural detailing of the new buildings will compliment and enhance the existing center. The City's architectural consultant has reviewed the project and provides the following minor suggestions: 1. Consider a second stair from the upper level of the garage to the ground level to discourage pedestrians from using auto ramps at the north end of the garage. 2. Consider widening the ground level garage entry at the north end (unless it will serve only as exiting). 3. Plant additional shading trees and enhance the existing landscaping wherever possible throughout the entire center. 4. Repeat the arch element through out all of the pedestrian entrances. 5. Add pedestrian walk (special paving material) between building A and existing buildings. 6. Details should be provided on how stucco wall top is finished off (avoid sheet metal cap flashing). If the Planning Commission finds merits in these suggestions, staff recommends that they be incorporated as conditions of the project and that revised plans be reviewed and approved by Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. Other Enhancements Other site enhancements that should be incorporated into the project are as follows: Bus Shelters: There are currently two bus stops along Wolfe Road. One of the bus stops is located near the intersection of Homestead and Wolfe. This bus stop will be relocated to the south of the entrance drive in front of Starbucks Coffee in order to promote safer vehicular movement. The site plan already reflects this change. In addition, staff suggests that the project be required to design and build appropriate bus stop shelters at the two bus stops. The final bus shelter design and location shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department to the Valley Transportation Authority's (VTA) specification. Reconstruction of Sidewalk: In order to prolong the life of the double row of Ash Trees along Wolfe Road and the street trees along Homestead Road, the existing perimeter sidewalk should be replaced with a new at-grade sidewalk to facilitate proper root growth and reduce future uplifting of the sidewalk. All monolithic sidewalks shall be replaced with detached sidewalk (except in situations where trees are in the way or special physical! functional constraints warrants special consideration by the Director of Community Development). Unused driveway curb cuts, unnecessary and unsafe curb features or tree wells shall be eliminated. Corner Plaza Enhancements: The project shall enhance the corner areas at the intersections of Pruneridge/Wolfe and Wolfe/Homestead. Said areas shall be Applications: U-2007-06, ASA-2007-10 (EA-2007-08) Cupertino Village Shopping Center Page 5 enhanced with special paving material, appropriate landscaping and sidewalk features and potentially benches or art features as determined by the City in order to improve the pedestrian experience and overall aesthetic of the site. A detailed corner plaza enhancement plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. The proposed site plan already acknowledges the plaza. Enhancements to the Interior Crosswalks: The applicant shall work with staff to determine areas within the existing shopping center that should be better delineated as special pedestrian walks or crossing areas. Such areas shall be enhanced with special paving materials and striping. Detailed plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. Parking Lot Shading Trees: The applicant shall work with staff to provide new parking lot shading trees to the maximum extent possible through out the entire shopping center. Detailed parking lot landscaping plan shall be approved by Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. Trash Enclosure Size and Location: A detailed trash enclosure plans shall be submitted to the City for review prior to issuance of building permits. New trash enclosures shall be located away from the residential neighborhood as far as possible. The final trash enclosure plan shall be reviewed by the City prior to issuance of building permits. Parking Cupertino Village Shopping Center is an extremely successful shopping center. As with any successful center, determining the appropriate amount of parking to meet the demand is always a challenging task since parking ratios in general do not account for success. From an environmental/ smart growth perspective, shopping centers should not be over-parked in order to minimize excessive paving area, reduce urban run-off, and promote alternative means of transportation to benefit air quality. Also, the parking demand of a shopping center may fluctuate depending on the time of day, season of the year, weather and even by the economy (since retail/restaurant demand has a strong correlation with the health of the economy). The City's parking ordinance provides general guidelines to address parking demands for individual uses such as office, general retail and different types of food services. Generally, these ratios are acceptable on individual applications but tend to be inaccurate when applied to larger projects with complicated mixture of uses. As a result, when large shopping centers propose site changes, the City retains a third parking professional parking engineer to evaluate parking demand on a case-by-case basis. Hexagon Transportation Consultants were retained by the City to evaluate the traffic and parking impacts of the project. Hexagon performed a parking occupancy survey on Saturday, July 21, between 1:00 and 3:00 PM and on Thursday, August 23, between 12:00 to 2:00 PM. The parking occupancy surveys focuses on the times of peak Applications: U-2007-06, ASA-2007-10 (EA-2007-08) Cupertino Village Shopping Center Page 6 demand. The logic is that if enough parking is provided based on peak hour demand, demand at other times would not exceed supply. The following is a summary of the survey results: July 21, 2007 - Saturday (1 to 3 PM) Stalls Occu 691 (100%) Consultant Comments There were vehicles continually entering and existing parking stalls, and there were vehicles waiting for each space that was be in vacated. NIA August 23, 2007 - Thursday (12 to 2 PM) 589 (85%) *No spill-over parking was observed on surrounding streets or properties in both instances. Based on the survey, the supply (691 stalls) exactly meets the demand (691 stalls) at the peak usage of the shopping center. To determine the parking demand for the expansion, Hexagon used both the City parking code and the parking industry standard. The City's code shows that the existing center needs 307 spaces for the retail! office use and 296 stalls for restaurants for a total of 603 stalls (see table below). Retail Office Restaurant TOTAL lper 1,000 square feet Existing s.f. City Code' 76,176 4.00 5,500 0.36 29,605 10.00 Spaces 305 2 296 603 Please note that for the restaurant use, Hexagon took a more conservative approach and used the industry standard ratio (10 stalls per 1,000 sq. ft.), which is more restrictive than the City's ratio (114 seats plus 1 per each employee). This exercise indicates that the City's parking code is insufficient (691 > 603) for determining the number of spaces needed for the expansion. Hexagon then used the survey results and calculated that the actual restaurant rate at the center is approximately 13 stalls per 1,000 square feet. By using this rate it resulted in a total demand of 691 spaces for the existing center, which matches the actual count data. Therefore based on the rates determined during the survey, the total parking demand for the shopping center after the expansion is projected to be at 800 stalls. There may be various other type studies that may show ratios that may produce more or less projected stalls. However, Hexagon believes that Applications: U-2007-06, ASA-2007-1O (EA-2007-08) Cupertino Village Shopping Center Page 7 using the parking ratios that were derived from the actual survey data is an appropriate way of projecting accurate parking demands for the expansion project. The following table summarizes what the project is proposing: # of stalls dis laced 89 # of stalls added 180 Net gain Total Existin *Re uired Net *Based on Hexagon's Parking Survey Projection. The currently site plan shows 782 stalls, which is 18 spaces short of the estimated demand (800 stalls). The Planning Commission has the following mitigation options to avoid parking shortage at the center: 1. Provide 18 more stalls in order to meet the parking demand. 2. Reduce the proposed expansion, which in turn reduces the parking demand. 3. Limit the proposed new restaurant square footage to 2,165 sq. ft. (a 50% reduction from what is being proposed) or the total restaurant square footage of the center to 31,770 sq. ft. in order to balance parking supply (782 stalls) with parking demand (781 stalls) until such time when 18 more stalls could be provided. 4. Consider implementing parking demand mitigation measures such as: Offsite employee parking arrangements with adjacent property owners (i.e., HP, Hilton Garden Inn and the Church). Carpool or vanpool incentives for employees, including preferential parking. Transit subsidization for employees. Valet Parking. If the Planning Commission finds merit in any of the above options (it may be a combination of several options), it should direct the applicant to revise the plans or provide a detailed parking plan to confirm that sufficient parking stalls have been provided based on Hexagon's recommendation. Staff received a letter from the abutting church property (located near the northwest corner of the project) stating that there is a private agreement allowing them to use some of the shopping center's parking lot. In general the City does not get involved in interpreting private agreements between two private property owners. In this case, there are no references of any reciprocal access or parking easement for the church on Applications: U-2007-06, ASA-2007-10 (EA-2007-08) Cupertino Village Shopping Center Page 8 the shopping center's property title. In spite of that, normal church activities are usually at off-peak times (Sunday morning) of the shopping center; therefore the impact of any parking share should be insignificant. Visual Over the past several years, 011e t11e main suggestions expressed by the adjacent residents is the desire to enha11ce how the shopping center interfaces with t11e adjacent residential homes 011 Lilu1et La11e. Currently, there is a relatively new 5-foot wood fence located 011 a berm along the westerly boundary of the shopping ce11ter (al011g Linnet Lane) wit11 minimal landscaping or screen trees along the fe11ce. The proposed parking garage is approximately 48 feet away from the residential properties. In consideration for t11e neighbors, the applicant is proposing a linear park alol1g the entire westerly boundary with a new detached sidewalk al1d double rows of screenil1g trees along Lilmet Lane (see diagram below). =~~~ -...., .. ~ 1:$&1.~'~ g)<llt1Nv ~/..~~., ~*--. ~~~~ ~Jj;~l' '~~~: ~ ~ ~~t, t~ ~ I I J I L..~t1bT:..M6 ~. ..~- ~'Q,.l.,..."" -~ - 'Y" . "---;-_ . ...., "IW"'~ I ~r ~,..J I 'MY~ ~t '.' I ::;~-~--; \; . r A SECTION LODI<ING NORTH I,LONG UNN[T Lf.o.l..,C ~I~U~- .. '0"_"" ~ _W'J.~~ ~ "'..t"~.. ~I.~ ~~ J/~ln:.'::l:!> , ~~\,f, -~.b"'~ ~~,~~.......'" ;~) Lr~-~.; ~ ~~,. ~g ",.111 .,_...~- I I I 1 I ll......T L.~"" I-~ .." -~- -r;;Tti ...,""""...~ I 1'\.AWr ~t'_/ B SECTION LOOKING NORTH ALONG LINNET L~NE ~' - -} ,-,..' :.} IlL' \ r Similar to the treatments that were required on the Macy's parkil1g garage, the west perimeter wall of the garage will act both as the visual screen wall a11d a sound wall Applications: U-2007-06, ASA-2007-10 (EA-2007-08) Cupertino Village Shopping Center Page 9 (see illustratio11 below). The wall will also be sided by a green screen system similar to the 011e on the Macy's garage. 111 additiol1 a short decorative parapet /roof wall is placed around the perimeter of t11e garage to prevent any views of the cars and their I1ead lights from the residential neighbors. ~ Noise The City has retained Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. to prepare a noise assessment 011 the project al1d provide recommendations on any required noise mitigation Ineasures. The report is being fi11alized at t11e time of preparatiol1 for t11is staff report. A detailed summary of the noise consultant's fi11di11gs and recommendations will be made available at the PIanni11g Commission I1eari11g. Lighting The applical1t has been requested to prepare a lig11ting plal1 a11d provide details on the location and iI1tel1sity of the parking lot lights (especially 011 top of the garage). Proper screening of lig11t sources and light pole heights may l1eed to be evaluated at the next PI aIming Commission hearing. Trees A prelimi11ary arborist report has been prepared by Mayne Tree Expert Compal1Y, Inc (see exhibit B) indicating there are 203 trees currently located withi11 or arou11d the perimeter of the s110pping center site. N011e of the trees 011 t11e site are defi11ed as protected trees i11 the City's Tree Ordinance. Accordi11g to the arborist report, 26 trees Applications: U-2007-06, ASA-2007-10 (EA-2007-08) Cupertino Village Shopping Center Page 10 (#60-62,74,77,78,130-132,151,152,180,182,188-198, 200 and 201) are identified for removal. After reviewing the conceptual landscaping plan, the City's Arborist Consultant is anticipating an additional seven trees that may be affected by the project (#38,76,79, 183-186). In addition, the City Consulting Arborist is recommending that trees #183 to 186 be considered for removal due to their poor health and declining condition. A summary of the City Arborist's suggestions are summarized below: 1. A detailed tree survey with a corresponding accurate landscaping plan (existing and proposed) should be provided. 2. The tree survey should all of the street trees in the vicinity of the project. 3. Prior to final approval, a topographic map, detailed site map with accurate tree locations, grading and drainage plan and utility plan should be reviewed in order to determine if any additional trees will be affected by the project. 4. A detailed tree replacement should be provided indicating replacement strategies consistent with the City's tree replacement guidelines (Section 14.18.180, Table A) If the Planning Commission agrees, the applicant shall address the above City Arborist's recommendations and the revised landscaping plan/report shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. Alternatively, the Planning Commission may require that the applicant address all of the landscaping concerns prior to an action is taken at the next public hearing. Green Building Measures The two new buildings will be required as a condition to be Leadership in Environmental and Engineering Design (LEED) certifiable (meeting at least 26 points out of 69 points). Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate to the City how the project will meet the LEED certification requirements. The LEED certification check list is attached for reference (Exhibit C). NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS A neighborhood meeting was held at City Hall on October 18,2007. Over 1,000 notices were sent out by the applicant and a total of 18 neighbors attended the meeting. The meeting was a voluntarily attempt on the applicant's part to reach out to the surrounding neighbors regarding the proposed project. Kelly Kline, Economic Development Manager of the City along with applicant (Brian Replinger) and the project architect (Young Wong and David Blair) were present at the meeting. Some of the key issues and comments expressed are summarized as follows: .:. Landscaping along Linnet Lane in the past has not been maintained. .:. Parking garage roof treatment and lighting design. .:. Parking in the residential neighborhood. Perhaps pedestrian access should be eliminated. Applications: U-2007-06, ASA-2007-1O (EA-2007-0S) Cupertino Village Shopping Center Page 11 .:. Pedestrian access is convenient for residents, and addresses a safety issue for everyone. .:. Parking permits might need to be considered in the future. .:. The proposal is a definite enhancement of Linnet Lane. .:. Consider posting signs discouraging patrons from parking in the residential neighborhood. .:. People like staying at the center. Hope it says that way. .:. Thank you for including the neighborhood early in the process. Please refer to Exhibit D for a detaied account of the neighborhood meeting. The applicant is planning on hosting a second neighborhood meeting on November S, 2007 at City Hall (room 100 starting at 6:30 p.m.) in order to give the residential neighbors that live immediately adjacent to the shopping center another opportunity to better understand the project and express input. Since the meeting will occur after the preparation of this staff report, a detailed summary of the meeting will be reported to the Planning Commission at the hearing. Staff also has received one email correspondence from a residential neighbor who lives on Parnell Place (see exhibit E) regarding concerns on parking. In addition, staff has met with a neighbor living on Linnet Lane. The following is a brief summary of the comments that were expressed: .:. Landscaping along Linnet Land should be enhanced and maintained. .:. The pedestrian access along Linnet Land should be eliminated in order to discourage shopping center patrons from parking in the residential neighborhood. .:. If the pedestrian access can not be eliminated, then it should be de-emphasized. .:. Spill over parking into the residential neighborhood is a concern. .:. A fence should be erected between the church and the shopping center in order to prevent patrons of the shopping center using Linnet Lane to get to the church property and park in its parking lot. .:. Prohibit the openings of nightclubs or bars in the shopping center to avoid additional late night nuisance and noise impacts to the adjacent residential neighborhood. .:. The noise abatement and enforcement measures should be improved. .:. The construction activities and noise impacts are concerns. .:. The new trash bin location should be identified. .:. Undesirable late night activities (delivery, stream blast and pumping truck activities) occur occasionally at the center late at night or early in the morning. Staff response: Applications: U-2007-06, ASA-2007-10 (EA-2007-08) Cupertino Village Shopping Center Page 12 The Planning Commission may consider incorporating the following conditions or mitigation measures in response to some of the neighbors concerns: 1. Require that a detailed landscaping maintenance plan be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Said plan shall include details on the irrigation system and the routing schedule of maintenance and the upkeep of the landscaping area along east side of Linnet Lane. 2. Require clear multi-language signs at each of the pedestrian entrances along Linnet Lane, informing them not to park in the residential streets. 3. Require that the conditions of approval (including the City's noise ordinance) be made part of the lease agreements of all new tenants so they will be informed of the conditions and rules that will be enforced. 4. Require that the trash enclosure plan be submitted for review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. All new trash enclosures shall be located as far away from the residential neighborhood as possible and shall be appropriately screened from public views. 5. Require that a detailed construction management plan be submitted to the City for review prior to issuance of building permit. Said plan shall include but not be limited to construction hours, truck routes, staging area, contractor parking area, tree protection measures, dust control and best management practices. No construction related vehicles shall use Linnet Lane to park or access the construction site. 6. Require that a detailed truck delivery schedule and truck routing plan be submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The applicant should also communicate with existing tenants of the City's regulations on delivery hours and noise limitations. 7. Require security cameras to be installed at key delivery areas to assist in monitoring and enforcing delivery hours and noise violators. 8. Require the installation of multi-language sign to inform truckers of the delivery hours and rules. 9. Require the center to enhance patrol service so that they can monitor and prevent spill over parking into the neighborhood and the delivery activities. The center should also provide a hotline to the adjacent residents to report any code violation and unsafe activities. 10. Require a I-year review of the use permit from the time the two new buildings receive final occupancy. ENVIRONMENT At REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) The project will be considered by the Environmental Review Committee (ERe) on November 14,2007. The final ERC recommendations and findings will be made available to the Planning Commission at the next public hearing. Applications: U-2007-06, ASA-2007-10 (EA-2007-08) Cupertino Village Shopping Center Page 13 Enclosures: Exhibit A: Parking and Traffic Report Exhibit B: Tree Report Exhibit C: LEED Certification Checklist Exhibit D: October 18, 2007 Neighborhood Meeting Minutes Exhibit E: Email Correspondence from Neighbors Plan Set Submitted by: Gary Chao, Senior Planner ~ I Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developme~ Cupertino Village Final Traffic and Parking Study Prepared for City of Cupertino Prepared by. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Sandi Domingue, Project Manager Updated October 22,2007 Exhibit A Table of Contents Executi ve Summary........................................................................................................................ ............ iii 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................................l 2. Existing Conditions.................................................................................................................... ............6 3. Background Conditions...................................................................................................................... ..12 4. Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures............................................................................................ 15 5. Future Growth Conditions. ............. ........ ........ ... ..... ... ..... ........ ..... ..... ... ..... ....... ............ ...................... ...26 6. Conclusions................................................................................................................... ...................... .29 Appendices Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Traffic Counts Level of Service Calculations Approved Trips List of Tables Table ES 1 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 Table 9 Intersection Level of Service Summary.............................................................................. v Intersection Level of Service Definitions...........................................................................5 Study Area Bus Routes....................................................................................................... 7 Existing Intersection Levels of Service ............................................................................11 Background Intersection Levels of Service ......................................................................14 Project Trip Estimates...................................................................................................... .17 Project Intersection Levels of Service............................................................................ ..21 City Code Parking Rates................................................................................................. ..24 ULI Study Parking Rates.................................................................................................. .25 CMP Intersection Levels of Service Under Future Growth Conditions ...........................28 List of Figures Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Site Location...................................................................................................................... .2 Existing Transit Facilities ... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ... ..... ..... ... ....... ....... ..... ....... ..... ....... ..... ....... ..8 Existing Lane Configurations............................................................................................. 9 Existing Traffic Volumes..................................................................................................l 0 Background Traffic Volumes............................................................................................ 13 Distribution of Project Trips........................................................................................... ..18 Assignment of Primary Project Trips..... ........ ..... ..... ..... ..... ......... ................... ..... ....... .......19 Pass-By Trip Assignment.................................................................................................. 20 Project Conditions Traffic Volumes ...... ..... ..... .......... .......... ....... ....... ............ ....... ....... .....22 Site Plan.......................................................................................................................... ..23 Future Growth Conditions Traffic Volumes ...................................................... ...............27 Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion II Executive Summary This report presents the results of the traffic impact analysis conducted for the proposed Cupertino Village Expansion. The project is located in the southwest quadrant of the Wolfe Road/Homestead Road intersection in Cupertino, California. The project site currently contains 76,176 sJ. of retail space, 5,500 s.f. of office space and 29,605 s.f. of restaurant space. The project as proposed would add three new commercial buildings (24,455 sJ.) and a two-story open parking structure. The site currently has three driveways on Wolfe Road, an entrance via Pruneridge Avenue and one driveway on Homestead Road. The proposed site plan includes the removal of the southernmost Wolfe Road driveway. The potential impacts of the project were evaluated in accordance with the standards set forth by the City of Cupertino and the Congestion Management Program (CMP) of Santa Clara County. The study included an analysis of AM and PM peak-hour traffic conditions for seven signalized intersections. An analysis of freeway levels of service was not performed because project trips on freeway segments would not be greater than one percent of the capacity of the segments. Project Trip Estimates The traffic generated by the existing shopping center was determined from a field survey. The number of trips generated by the proposed expansion was estimated using the trip generation rates calculated from the survey of the existing center. Daily project trips and AM peak hour trips were extrapolated from the peak-hour project trip estimates. Using the observed trip rate, the proposed 24,455 s.f. expansion would generate 55 AM peak-hour trips and 205 PM peak-hour trips. The existing shopping center generates 334 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour, 929 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour and 10,637 daily vehicle trips. The proposed retail trip estimates also reflect a 25 percent reduction for PM pass-by trips. Pass-by trips already pass directly by the project site and would stop at the project site while en route to their ultimate destination. Excluding pass-by trips, the project would add 55 trips during the AM peak hour and 154 trips during the PM peak hour. The project trip distribution pattern was estimated based on existing travel patterns in the area and the locations of complementary land uses. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion III Project Findings Table ES-l presents a summary of the intersection level of service analysis. The findings of this analysis are summarized below: · The results of the intersection level of service analysis show that none of the signalized study intersections would be significantly impacted by the project according to City of Cupertino and CMP level of service standards. . The proposed project would not have any significant adverse impacts on existing pedestrian, bicycle or transit facilities in the project area. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Vii/age Expansion IV Table ES 1 Intersection Level of Service Summary Existing Background Project Conditions Peak Count Ave. Ave. Ave. Incr. In Incr. In Intersection Hour Date Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Crit Delay Crit V/C De Anza Blvd & Homestead Rd' AM 1 0/3/2006 34.7 C 35.6 D 35.7 D +0.0 +0.000 PM 10/3/2006 45.8 D 47.9 D 48.2 D +0.3 +0.001 Homestead Rd & Blaney Av AM 7/17/2007 15.8 B 15.9 B 15.8 B -0.1 +0.001 PM 7/17/2007 13.5 B 13.6 B 13.5 B -0.1 +0.003 Homestead Rd & Wolfe Rd AM 7/17/2007 32.1 C 32.2 C 32.4 C +0.2 +0.004 PM 7/17/2007 33.5 C 34.3 C 34.7 C +0.4 +0.010 Wolfe Rd & Prune ridge AM 7/17/2007 16.4 B 17.6 B 18.4 B +0.6 +0.007 PM 7/17/2007 24.7 C 29.8 C 31.6 C +2.0 +0.035 Wolfe Rd & 1-280 NB Ramp' AM 10/3/2006 10.1 B 10.2 B 10.2 B +0.0 +0.004 PM 10/3/2006 7.2 A 8.7 A 8.7 A +0.1 +0.007 Wolfe Rd & 1-280 SB Ramp' AM 1 0/3/2006 7.9 A 7.6 A 7.6 A +0.0 +0.003 PM 1 0/3/2006 7.1 A 8.6 A 8.6 A -0.6 +0.001 Wolfe Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd' AM 1 0/3/2006 35.4 D 37.6 D 37.7 D +0.1 +0.003 PM 10/3/2006 32.8 C 50.5 D 51.8 D +3.4 +0.011 . Denotes CMP Intersections Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion v 1. Introduction This report presents the results of the traffic and parking study conducted for the proposed Cupertino Village expansion located in the southeast quadrant of the Wolfe Road/Homestead Road intersection in Cupertino, California. The project site currently contains 76, I 76 s.f. of retail space, 5,500 s.f. of office space and 29,605 s.f. of restaurant space. The project as proposed would add three new commercial buildings (24,455 s.f.) and a two-story open parking structure. The site currently has three driveways on Wolfe Road, an entrance via Pruneridge Avenue and one driveway on Homestead Road. The proposed site plan includes the removal of the southernmost Wolfe Road driveway. The site location is shown on Figure 1. This study was conducted for the purpose of identifying the potential traffic impacts related to the proposed development. The impacts of the project were evaluated following the standards and methodologies set forth by the City of Cupertino and the Congestion Management Program (CMP) of Santa Clara County. The study includes an analysis of traffic conditions at seven signalized intersections. An analysis of freeway levels of service was not performed because project trips on freeway segments would not be greater than one percent of the capacity of the segments. Scope of Study This study was conducted for the purpose of identifying the potential traffic impacts related to the proposed development. The impacts of the project were evaluated following the standards and methodologies set forth by the City of Cupertino and the Congestion Management Program (CMP) of Santa Clara County. The traffic analysis is based on peak-hour levels of service for seven signalized intersections. The traffic analysis also includes an evaluation of vehicle queuing at high-demand turning movements at study intersections. The study intersections identified by City staff are listed below. Wolfe Road and Homestead Road Wolfe Road and Pruneridge A venue Wolfe Road and 1-280 NB Ramp* Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion Figure 1 Site Location Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 2 Wolfe Road and 1-280 SB Ramp* Wolfe Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard* Homestead Road and Blaney A venue Homestead Road and De Anza Boulevard* Asterisk (*) denotes CMP intersections. Traffic conditions at the study intersections were analyzed for the typical weekday AM and PM peak commute hours of traffic. The AM peak hour of traffic is generally between 7:00 and 9:00 AM, and the PM peak hour is typically between 4:00 and 6:00 PM. It is during these periods that the most congested traffic conditions occur on an average day. Traffic conditions were evaluated for the following scenanos: · Existing Conditions: Existing traffic volumes were obtained from recent traffic counts. · Background Conditions: Background traffic volumes were estimated by adding to existing volumes the projected volumes from approved but not yet completed developments. · Project Conditions: Future traffic volumes with the project (hereafter called project traffic volumes) were estimated by adding to background traffic volumes the net additional traffic generated by the project. Project conditions were evaluated relative to background conditions in order to determine potential project impacts. · Future Growth Conditions: Traffic volumes under future growth conditions were estimated by applying a growth factor to existing volumes, adding trips from approved developments, and adding project trips. This scenario is evaluated in fulfillment of CMP requirements. Methodology This section presents the methods used to determine the traffic conditions for each scenario described above. It includes descriptions of the data requirements, the analysis methodologies, and the applicable level of service standards. Data Requirements The data required for the analysis were obtained from new traffic counts, field reconnaissance and the City of Cupertino. The following data were collected from these sources: · existing traffic volumes . lane configurations . signal timing and phasing . approved project trips Analysis Methodologies and Level of Service Standards Traffic conditions at the study intersections were evaluated using level of service (LOS). Level of Service is a qualitative description of operating conditions ranging from LOS A, or free-flow conditions with little or no delay, to LOS F, or jammed conditions with excessive delays. The analysis method is described below. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 3 All the study intersections are subject to the City of Cupertino level of service standards. The City of Cupertino level of service methodology is based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) method for signalized intersections using the TRAFFIX software. This method evaluates signalized intersection operations on the basis of average delay time for all vehicles at the intersection. The City of Cupertino methodology employs the CMP default values for the analysis parameters. The City of Cupertino level of service standard for signalized intersections is LOS D or better. The correlation between average stopped delay and level of service is shown in Table 1. Report Organization The remainder of this report is divided into five chapters. Chapter 2 describes existing conditions in terms of the existing roadway network, transit service, and existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Chapter 3 presents the intersection operations under background conditions. Chapter 4 describes the method used to estimate project traffic and its impacts on the transportation system. Chapter 5 discusses the traffic conditions resulting from additional future growth. Chapter 6 presents the conclusions of the traffic and parking study. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 4 Table 1 Intersection Level of Service Definitions Level of Service Description Average Stopped Delay Per Vehicle (Sec.) A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle lengths. Less than 10.0 B Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. 10.1 to 20.0 C Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear. 20.1 to 35.0 D Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. 35.1 to 55.0 E Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. 55.1 to 80.0 F Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to oversaturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths. Greater than 80.0 Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual (2000). 5 Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 2. Existing Conditions This chapter describes the existing conditions for all of the major transportation facilities in the vicinity of the site, including the roadway network, transit service, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Existing Roadway Network Local and regional access to the site is provided by the following roadways: 1-280 is an eight-lane, north-south highway that extends from the U.S. 101/1-680 interchange in San Jose north to the South of Market area in San Francisco. The peak direction on 1-280 is northbound in the morning and southbound in the evening. In the project vicinity, 1-280 operates in an east-west direction. Wolfe Road is a six-lane arterial that runs in a north-south direction through Cupertino. It extends from Stevens Creek Boulevard in the south to the north where it operates as Fair Oaks Avenue. Left-turn pockets are provided at major intersections. Wolfe Road is lined with a mix of commercial, residential and public uses. In the vicinity of the site, there are bike lanes and on-street parking is not permitted. Two project driveways would connect to Wolfe Road. There is a landscaped median on Wolfe Road that prohibits left turns into and out of the site. Homestead Road is a four-lane, east-west arterial that runs adjacent to the northern border of the proposed project site. Homestead Road is lined with a mix of commercial and residential uses. There is intermittent on-street parking permitted in the project vicinity. There are bike lanes and one project driveway on Homestead Road. Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Wolfe Road, Homestead Road and Pruneridge A venue are designated as bike routes in the vicinity of the site. On these streets, bicyclists share the roadway with motor vehicles. Although not specifically Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 6 designated as bike routes, most neighborhood streets are suitable for bicycle travel due to the low traffic volumes and low vehicle speeds. Pedestrian facilities in the study area consist primarily of sidewalks, pedestrian push buttons and signal heads at intersections. Sidewalks are found along Wolfe Road and Homestead Road. Existing Transit Service Existing transit service within the study area is provided by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The project site is served directly by bus routes 26,36,51 and 81, which run along Wolfe Road adjacent to the project site. These bus routes are shown in Figure 2. Table 2 describes the route terminus points and commute hour headways. Table 2 Study Area Bus Routes Bus Lines Route Description Peak Hour Headways (min.) 26 36 51 81 Eastridge Transit Center to Sunnyvale/Lockheed Martin Penitencia Creek Transit Center to Valley FairNallco Park Vallco Park to Moffett Field/Ames Center McKee & Capitol to Vallco Park 20 to 30 30 20 to 60 1 0 to 60 Lane Configurations & Traffic Volumes The existing lane configurations at the study intersections were provided by City staff and confirmed by observations in the field (See Figure 3). Existing AM and PM peak commute-hour traffic volumes were obtained from the City of Cupertino and supplemented with manual turning-movement counts at intersections where counts were unavailable. The existing AM and PM peak commute-hour intersection volumes are shown on Figure 4. The traffic count data are included in Appendix A. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 7 Figure 2 Existing Transit Facilities Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 8 Figure 3 Existing Lane Configurations Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 9 Figure 4 Existing Traffic Volumes Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 10 Existing Intersection Levels of Service The results of the level of service analysis under existing AM and PM peak commute-hour volumes are summarized in Table 3. All of the signalized study intersections currently operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS D or better) during both peak hours, according to City of Cupertino standards and CMP standards. The calculation sheets are included in Appendix B. Table 3 Existing Intersection Levels of Service Existing Peak Count Ave. Intersection Hour Date Delay LOS De Anza Blvd & Homestead Rd* AM 1 0/3/2006 34.7 C PM 1 0/3/2006 45.8 D Homestead Rd & Blaney Av AM 7/17/2007 15.8 B PM 7/17/2007 13.5 B Homestead Rd & Wolfe Rd AM 7/17/2007 32.1 C PM 7/17/2007 33.5 C Wolfe Rd & Pruneridge AM 7/17/2007 16.4 B PM 7/17/2007 24.7 C Wolfe Rd & 1-280 NB Ramp* AM 1 0/3/2006 10.1 B PM 1 0/3/2006 7.2 A Wolfe Rd & 1-280 SB Ramp* AM 1 0/3/2006 7.9 A PM 1 0/3/2006 7.1 A Wolfe Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd* AM 1 0/3/2006 35.4 D PM 1 0/3/2006 32.8 C * Denotes CMP Intersections Observed Existing Traffic Conditions Traffic conditions in the field were observed in order to identify existing operational deficiencies and to confirm the accuracy of calculated levels of service. The purpose of this effort was (1) to identify any existing traffic problems that may not be directly related to intersection level of service, and (2) to identify any locations where the level of service calculation does not accurately reflect level of service in the field. The field observations revealed that for the most part, level of service calculations accurately reflect existing conditions. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 11 3. Background Conditions This chapter describes background traffic conditions. Background conditions are defined as conditions just prior to completion of the proposed development. Traffic volumes for background conditions comprise volumes from the existing traffic counts, plus traffic generated by other approved developments in the vicinity of the site. This chapter describes the procedure used to determine background traffic volumes and the resulting traffic conditions. Roadway Network & Traffic Volumes It is assumed in this analysis that the transportation network under background conditions, including bicycle and pedestrian facilities, transit service, roadways and intersection lane configurations, would be unchanged from existing conditions. Background peak-hour traffic volumes were calculated by adding to the existing volumes the estimated traffic from approved but not yet constructed developments in the vicinity of the site. Information to determine the added traffic from approved but not yet constructed developments was provided by the City in the form of project size, location, land use and distribution (see Appendix C for approved trip list). This information was used to determine the amount of traffic that each project added to the Cupertino study intersections. Background traffic volumes are shown on Figure 5. Background Intersection Levels of Service The results of the level of service analysis under background conditions are summarized in Table 4. All of the signalized study intersections would operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS D or better) according to City of Cupertino standards. The calculation sheets are included in Appendix B. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 12 Figure 5 Background Traffic Volumes Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 13 Table 4 Background Intersection Levels of Service Background Peak Count Ave. Intersection Hour Date Delay LOS De Anza Blvd & Homestead Rd. AM 1 0/3/2006 35.6 D PM 1 0/3/2006 47.9 D Homestead Rd & Blaney Av AM 7/17/2007 15.9 B PM 7/17/2007 13.6 B Homestead Rd & Wolfe Rd AM 7/17/2007 32.2 C PM 7/17/2007 34.3 C Wolfe Rd & Pruneridge AM 7/17/2007 17.6 B PM 7/17/2007 29.8 C Wolfe Rd & 1-280 NB Ramp. AM 1 0/3/2006 10.2 B PM 1 0/3/2006 8.7 A Wolfe Rd & 1-280 SB Ramp. AM 1 0/3/2006 7.6 A PM 1 0/3/2006 8.6 A Wolfe Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd. AM 1 0/3/2006 37.6 D PM 1 0/3/2006 50.5 D . Denotes CMP Intersections Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 14 4. Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures This chapter describes traffic conditions under project conditions, any significant project impacts, and measures that are recommended to mitigate any project impacts. Included are descriptions of the significance criteria that define an impact and estimates of project-generated traffic. Project conditions are represented by background traffic conditions with the addition of traffic generated by the project. It is assumed in this analysis that the future transportation network under project conditions would be the same as the existing transportation network. Significant Impact Criteria Significance criteria are used to establish what constitutes an impact. For this analysis the criteria for impacts at intersections are based on the City of Cupertino and the Congestion Management Program (CMP) of Santa Clara County level of service standards. Project impacts on other transportation facilities, such as bicycle facilities and transit, were determined on the basis of engineering judgment. City of Cupertino The project is said to create a significant adverse impact on traffic conditions at a signalized intersection in the City of Cupertino if for either peak hour: I. The level of service at the intersection degrades from an acceptable LOS D or better under background conditions to an unacceptable LOS E or F under project conditions, or 2. The level of service at the intersection is an unacceptable LOS E or F under background conditions and the addition of project trips causes both the critical-movement delay to increase by four or more seconds and the demand-to-capacity ratio (V IC) to increase by .01 or more. An exception to this rule applies when the addition of project traffic reduces the amount of average stopped delay for critical movements (i.e., the change in average stopped delay for critical movements is Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 15 negative). In this case, the threshold of significance is an increase in the critical VIC value by .01 or more. CMP The definition of a significant impact at a CMP intersection is the same as for the City of Cupertino, except that the CMP standard for acceptable level of service at a CMP intersection is LOS E or better. A significant impact by CMP standards is said to be satisfactorily mitigated when measures are implemented that would restore intersection conditions to LOS E or better. Project Trip Estimates The magnitude of traffic produced by a new development and the locations where that traffic would appear are estimated using a three-step process: (1) trip generation, (2) trip distribution, and (3) trip assignment. In determining project trip generation, the magnitude of traffic entering and exiting the site is estimated for the weekday AM and PM peak hours. As part of the project trip distribution, an estimate is made of the directions to and from which the project trips would travel. In the project trip assignment, the project trips are assigned to specific streets and intersections. These procedures are further described in the following sections. Trip Generation The trips generated by the existing shopping center were surveyed on Wednesday, July 18,2007 from 4:00 to 6:00 PM. The trip generation survey consisted of a count of the number of vehicles entering and exiting the six existing site driveways. The peak hour within this period was identified and the hourly trip generation rate was derived. The inbound and outbound volume splits for the proposed project were based upon the existing inbound/outbound trips from the trip generation survey. The ITE Trip Generation manual Shopping Center land use includes various types of uses that might be found in a typical shopping center (e.g. restaurant, office, retail, etc.). After reviewing Trip Generation, Hexagon found that the rates are lower than those collected from the trip generation study performed at the project site. As a result, Hexagon used the rates from the trip generation study to provide a more conservative analysis and to better reflect the conditions at Cupertino Village. Existing Shopping Center The Cupertino Village Shopping Center generated approximately 929 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. This equates to a rate of 8.37 PM peak-hour vehicle trips per 1,000 square feet (s.f.). The AM and daily traffic generated by the existing shopping center was extrapolated from the observed peak-hour trips. A comparison of shopping center trip rates published in the ITE Trip Generation manual shows that daily trips typically equal approximately 11 times the number of PM peak-hour trips on a weekday. In addition, Trip Generation rates show that AM peak hour trips equate to approximately 27 percent of PM peak hour trips. It is assumed that the same relationship between daily and peak-hour trips holds for the Cupertino Village Shopping Center. Hexagon utilized the Trip Generation factors to determine trip generation rates for the AM peak and for daily trips. Thus, the existing shopping center is estimated to generate 10,219 vehicle trips on an average weekday. These net project trip estimates include pass-by trips. Pass-by trips already pass directly by the project site and would stop at the project site while en route to their ultimate destination. For retail uses the proportion of pass-by trips comprise an average of 25% of the site-generated PM peak hour traffic. The remaining 75% of the net project trips are primary trips that are new to the roadway network. Excluding Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Vii/age Expansion 16 pass-by trips, the project would add 55 trips during the AM peak hour and 154 trips during the PM peak hour. Trip Distribution and Assignment The project trip distribution pattern was estimated based on existing travel patterns in the area and the locations of complementary land uses. Figure 6 illustrates the distribution of primary and pass-by project trips. Figure 7 shows the assignment of pass-by trips at the project driveways. Figure 8 shows the net assignment of project trips at the study intersections. Table 5 Project Trip Estimates AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Peak-Hr Peak-Hr Rate In Out Total Rate In Out Total 2.26 34 22 55 8.37 98 106 205 (25) (26) (51) 34 22 55 74 80 154 Use Retail' Daily Daily Size Rate Trips 24,455 s.f. 95.84 2,344 Pass-by Reduction2 (25%) Primary Trips Notes: 1 Per 1,000 square feet. Source: Cupertino Village Survey, Wednesday, 7/18/2007 4-6 PM. 2A reduction of 25% was applied to the proposed Retail Stores during the PM peak hour. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 17 Figure 6 Distribution of Project Trips Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 18 Figure 7 Assignment of Primary Project Trips Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 19 Figure 8 Pass-By Project Trips Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 20 Project Intersection Analysis Project trips, as represented in the above project trip assignment, were added to background traffic volumes to obtain background plus project traffic volumes. Background traffic volumes plus project trips are typically referred simply as project traffic volumes. The project traffic volumes are shown graphically on Figure 9. The intersection level of service results under project conditions are summarized in Table 6. The level of service calculation sheets are included in Appendix B. The results show that none of the study intersections would be impacted by the proposed project according to the City of Cupertino and CMP level of service standards for signalized intersections. All of the study intersections are expected to operate at level of service D or better. Table 6 Project Intersection Levels of Service Background Project Conditions Peak Count Ave. Ave. Incr. In Incr. In Intersection Hour Date Delay LOS Delay LOS Crit Delay Crit V/C De Anza Blvd & Homestead Rd' AM 1 0/3/2006 35.6 D 35.7 D +0.0 +0.000 PM 1 0/3/2006 47.9 D 48.2 D +0.3 +0.001 Homestead Rd & Blaney Av AM 7/17/2007 15.9 B 15.8 B -0.1 +0.001 PM 7/17/2007 13.6 B 13.5 B -0.1 +0.003 Homestead Rd & Wolfe Rd AM 7/17/2007 32.2 C 32.4 C +0.2 +0.004 PM 7/17/2007 34.3 C 34.7 C +0.4 +0.010 Wolfe Rd & Pruneridge AM 7/17/2007 17.6 B 18.4 B +0.6 +0.007 PM 7/17/2007 29.8 C 31.6 C +2.0 +0.035 Wolfe Rd & 1-280 NB Ramp' AM 1 0/3/2006 10.2 B 10.2 B +0.0 +0.004 PM 1 0/3/2006 8.7 A 8.7 A +0.1 +0.007 Wolfe Rd & 1-280 SB Ramp' AM 1 0/3/2006 7.6 A 7.6 A +0.0 +0.003 PM 1 0/3/2006 8.6 A 8.6 A -0.6 +0.001 Wolfe Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd' AM 10/3/2006 37.6 D 37.7 D +0.1 +0.003 PM 10/3/2006 50.5 D 51.8 D +3.4 +0.011 , Denotes CMP Intersections Other Transportation Issues Site Access & Circulation Figure 10 presents the project site plan. Circulation within the parking lot is generally adequate. The majority of the parking stalls would be at 90 degrees to the main drive aisles, including the stalls in the parking deck. The parking stalls located between the existing Ranch 99 market and the building containing Starbucks will remain at 45 degrees. The drive aisles are sufficiently wide to allow vehicles to back up or turn. There are currently five driveways into the project site, including three on Wolfe Road. As part of the proposed project, the southernmost driveway on Wolfe Road will be removed. The current middle Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 21 Figure 9 Project Conditions Traffic Volumes Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Vii/age Expansion 22 Figure 10 Site Plan Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 23 driveway on Wolfe Road will be relocated approximately 30 feet to the north. The location of the three remaining project driveways will stay the same. The proposed project would have vehicular access via one driveway on Homestead Road, two right-turn only driveways on Wolfe Road, and one entrance via Pruneridge Avenue just west of the Homestead/De Anza intersection. The driveway on Homestead would be reconfigured as a right-turn only entrance as required by the City of Cupertino. All of the project driveways would be sufficiently designed to accommodate the shopping center traffic. Parking The proposed project includes the construction of a two-story open parking structure. There are currently 691 parking stalls on the project site. After proposed project completion, there would be a total of 787 parking spaces. To determine the adequacy of the existing and proposed parking supply, Hexagon conducted parking occupancy surveys on Saturday, July 21 between 1:00 and 3:00 PM and on Thursday, August 23 between 12:00 noon and 2:00 PM. The parking occupancy surveys focused on the times of peak demand. Thus, if enough parking is provided based on peak hour demand, demand at other times would not exceed supply. The counts were conducted for the entire parking lot for all areas of the shopping center. On Saturday July 21, one hundred percent of the parking stalls were occupied (691 stalls). There were vehicles continually entering and exiting parking stalls, and there were vehicles waiting for each space that was being vacated. However, no spill-over parking was observed on surrounding streets or properties. On Thursday August 23, the peak parking occupancy count was at 85 percent of capacity (589 stalls occupied). It can be concluded that the existing parking supply of 691 spaces exactly matches the size of the center. To determine the parking demand for the expansion, Hexagon checked both the City parking code and parking industry research. The city parking code shows that the existing center needs 603 parking spaces (see Table 7). The actual demand, however, is 691 spaces, as noted above. Therefore, the city code is insufficient for determining the number of spaces needed for the expansion. Table 7 City Code Parking Rates Retail Office Restaurant TOTAL 'per 1,000 square feet Existing s.f. City Code 1 76,176 4.00 5,500 0.36 29,605 10.00 Spaces 305 2 296 603 One widely used and industry accepted source of parking data is the Urban Land Institute (UU) publication Shared Parking. This publication is a compilation of parking surveys at numerous locations throughout the United States. Based upon their research, ULI has published recommended parking ratios for different types of land uses. Table 8 shows the existing shopping center's land use square footage along with the expected parking demand based on Shared Parking suggested parking ratios. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 24 Table 8 ULI Study Parking Rates Retail Office Restaurant TOTAL Existin s.f. 76,176 5,500 29,605 111,281 Rate' 4.00 0.55 15.00 Reauired Parkina Proposed Low' Rate2 Hi h2 Rate3 Ad'usted3 s.t. 305 4.00 305 4.00 305 88,228 3 0.55 3 0.55 3 13,574 444 20.00 592 12.94 383 33,934 752 900 691 135,736 Rate 4.00 0.52 12.97 Required Parkin 353 7 440 800 11ncludes ULI's Family Restaurant Use 21ncludes ULI's Fine/Casual Dining Use 3Sased on parking survey The number of spaces would range from 444 to 592 depending on the assumed type of restaurants. The ULI data show a range of parking rates for restaurants. ULI's recommended ratio is 15.0 spaces per 1,000 s.f. for family restaurants and 20.0 spaces per 1,000 s.f. for fine/casual dining. Based on the existing demand found in the parking surveys described above, the actual parking demand for the restaurant portion of the shopping center is lower than the lowest ULI rate. The measured restaurant rate at the center is estimated to be 13.0 spaces per 1,000 s.f. This would result in a calculated demand of 691 spaces, which matches the actual count data. Based on the parking rates determined during the surveys, the expanded Cupertino Village would require 800 parking spaces (see Table 8). The current site plan shows 787 spaces, which is 13 spaces short of the estimated demand. Possible mitigation measures to avoid parking shortages at Cupertino Village with the expansion include the following: . revised site plan to pick up 13 spaces . agreement with nearby entity to share parking (adjacent church, etc.) . valet parking . off site parking with a shuttle for employees . carpool or vanpool incentives for employees, including preferential parking . transit subsidization for employees Bicycle, Pedestrian and Transit Facilities The project would not change or alter pedestrian, bike or transit facilities in the area. In addition, the project would not create a demand for these facilities greater than what is currently provided. For these reasons, the project would not result in a significant impact on bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 25 5. Future Growth Conditions This chapter presents a summary of the traffic conditions that would occur under future growth conditions. The purpose of analyzing future growth conditions is to assess the traffic conditions that would occur at the time that the proposed development becomes occupied. For this analysis, the assumed occupancy is 2010. The analysis of future growth conditions is required by the CMP and includes an analysis of level of service for CMP intersections only. Roadway Network & Traffic Volumes The intersection lane configurations under future growth conditions were assumed to be the same as described under project conditions. Traffic volumes under future growth conditions were estimated by applying to the existing volumes an annual growth rate of 1.2 percent, then adding the trips from approved developments and the project trips. The traffic volumes under future growth conditions are shown in Figure 10. Levels of Service The level of service results for the CMP intersections under future growth conditions are summarized in Table 9. The results show that all of the CMP study intersections would operate at LOS D or better under future growth conditions. The intersection level of service calculations are included in Appendix B. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 26 Figure 11 Future Growth Traffic Volumes Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 27 Table 9 CMP Intersection levels of Service Under Future Growth Conditions Peak Ave. Intersection Hour Delay LOS De Anza Blvd & Homestead Rd' AM 36.6 D PM 52.0 D Wolfe Rd & 1-280 NB Ramp' AM 10.5 B PM 8.9 A Wolfe Rd & 1-280 SB Ramp' AM 7.7 A PM 8.7 A Wolfe Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd' AM 38.3 D PM 54.8 D . Denotes CMP Intersection Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 28 6. Conclusion The findings of this analysis are summarized below: . Excluding pass-by trips, the proposed project is estimated to generate a net increase of 55 trips during the AM peak hour and 154 trips during the PM peak hour. . The results of the intersection level of service analysis show that none of the signalized study intersections would be significantly impacted by the project according to City of Cupertino and CMP level of service standards. . The proposed project would not have any significant adverse impacts on existing pedestrian, bicycle or transit facilities in the project area. . The project would not provide sufficient parking on site to meet the demand during the Saturday peak. Possible mitigation measures include provision of off-site parking, implementation of valet parking or employee rideshare programs. Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Cupertino Village Expansion 29 AQpendix A Traffic Counts AQpendix B level of Service Calculations AQpendix C Approved Trips 8Qpendix A Traffic Counts Traffic Data Service 1386 White Oaks Road, Suite 1 Campbell, CA 95008 I(lsbay@!:s.com File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : 1AMFINAL : 00000001 : 10/3/2006 : 1 Grou sPrinted- Veh.icles Start Time Factor 07:00 AM 07;15 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM Total 08:00 AM 136 134 0 0 270 206 0 136 2 344 94 314 0 0 408 0 0 0 1 1 1023 08;15 AM 185 153 0 0 338 156 0 79 2 237 78 317 0 0 395 0 0 0 0 0 970 08:30 AM 136 168 0 0 304 180 0 86 2 258 42 305 0 0 347 0 0 0 2 2 921 08:45 AM 116 174 0 0 290 178 0 82 0 260 42 384 0 0 426 0 0 0 0 0 976 Total 573 629 0 0 1202 720 0 383 6 1109 256 1320 0 0 1576 0 0 0 3 3 3890 . Grand Total I 1128 1177 0 2 230711279 0 698 101987 1569 2058 0 0 2627\ 0 0 0 7 716928 Apprch % 48.9 51 0 0.1 64.4 0 35.1 0.5 21.7 78.3 0 0 0 0 0 100 Total % 16.3 17 0 0 33.3 18.5 0 10.1 0.1 28.7 8.2 29.7 0 0 37.9 0 0 0 0.1 0.1 08;00 AM 136 134 0 0 270 206 0 136 2 344 94 314 0 0 408 0 0 0 1 1 1023 08:15AM 185 153 0 0 338 156 0 79 2 237 78 317 0 0 395 0 0 0 0 0 970 08:30 AM 136 168 0 0 304 180 0 86 .2 268 42 305 0 0 347 0 0 0 2 2 921 08:45 AM 116 174 0 0 290 178 0 82 0 260 42 384 0 0 426 0 0 0 0 0 976 Total Volume 573 629 0 0 1202 720 0 383 6 1109 256 1320 0 0 1576 0 0 0 3 3 3890 % Aoo. ToIal 47.7 52.3 0 0 64.9 0 34.5 0.5 16.2 83.8 0 0 0 0 0 100 PHF .774 .904 .000 .000 .889 .874 .000 .704 .750 .806 .681 .859 .000 .000 .925 .000 .000 .000 .375 .375 .951 f4i?~S,02. 2.02/ 1~44- 11/30/2006 13:37 FAX 408377~998 TRAFFIC DATA SERVICE ~ 002 Traffic Data Service Campbell, CA (408) 377-1988 tdsba~s.com File Name : 1 PMFINAL Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 11/29/2006 Page No ; 1 Grou ~ Printed- Vehicle~ :-:".-'.'----l .~~~~~~d. 1'2~~;ft~1F~~SI" :... ..,.....~l~~~;;~.J.... ....hi.JTi;.r~~oJl!nd~BOI :~~gi;~ R~B~ :~g ..~~g. tg.... 3:" ~\l ~;~g.q~~': ='~~:n~~lT !1'1~g{i~ ~: .R~~~~~~1~g ~t~_~~~~...:=;:~j 05: 15 PM 72 236 0 0 308 126 0 101 0 227 49 153 0 0 202 0 0 0 0 0 737 g~;;~ ~~ . ~{jit .J .. . g.. . ~~~. . U~ .....t_...~t...._E___.~~~ ~~Jit_.J_.__._~_. "".3~g . .."g g.. t g ~ ~;; Total 317 loa1 0 0 1346 484 0 306 :2 792 126 597 0 0 723 0 0 0 :3 3 2666 06:00 PM 148 340 0 0 486 102 a 69. 3 174 aB' 167. a 0 ~05 0 0 0 0 0 865 06:15 PM 152 340 0 0 492 145 0 72 0 217 19 166 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 0 916 OS:~O PM 145 253 0 0 399 63 0 90 0 153 26 174 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 752 06:45 PM 156 362 .0 0 520 13<> 0 94 0 224 16 160 0 0 196 0 0 0 0 o 940 .. 'Total 6'02 1211$ 0 "0 1897 440 .....".0' "325----"-a-- 768 99 709 0- 0 80B 0 0 0 0 --. -tj" " 3473"" Grlilnd TOt$11919. ZJZ6 0 0 3245 1924 0 631 5 15601225 1305 0 0 15311 0 0 0 3 : I 6339 Apprch % 26.3 71.7 0 a SU 0 40.4 0.3 14.7 65.3 0 a 0 0 0 100 Total % 14.5 36.7 0 a 51.2. 14.6 0 10 0.1 24.6 3.5 20.6 0 0 24.2 0 0 0 0 WOLFE RO-----.-----f..--.-... 1:2'80 Nfl RAMPS. ,. - 'WOLFE RO . "1' .,/ Soutllbound Westbound Northbound ' Eastbound '~~~~!!~~'. ~.~~~J::tti~J.:~~.f!I~#!.[~;':;~~: )1~~i.l.T~~~l4~0 p'elli.1. -,.... RI"~11 Thl'l,l I Left.! POtl& I ....r.... Righi i Thiv i l-eft I ?~& I A!f'~..' !nl. Tgl.' I Peak Hour AnalY5is From 05:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 . Peak Hour for Entillt Intarsecticn Begins at 06:00 PM 06:00 PM 146 340 0 a 485 102 0 59 3 174 38 167 0 Q 205 0 06:15 PM 152 340 0 a 492 145 0 72 0 217 19 188 0 0 207 0 0$;30 PM 146 253 0 0 399 63 0 90 0 153 26 174 0 0 200 0 06:45 PM 158 362 0 0 620 130 0 94 0 224 16 180 0 0 196 0 TolelVolUme 602 1295 0 0 1897 440'...-...'0.-325..."......3. '''768' '''5i9' 709".....0 . . t;' ....acs..... bOO' % App. Total 31.7 68.3 0 0 57.3 0 42.3 0.4 . 12.3 67.7. 0 0 0 ..:.....:::.~::f.>8.17' ~~s~.. :~9.4. :';06.0 .':"0.00'.::' ~91'2. .!59 .'O~~. '.864" .~SO . "~$.? .6~'f...:~3.' .'~o~.. .,.o.bo . .g:r~ ..~00 0000665 o 0 0 0 916 o 0 0 0 752 0000940 . .0..... '(f'''. "0"- "'.""',5" --3473- 000 .000 .000" :oocf . .000 . .~24 \ \ t, "'. '. ), ' " .. \\ \\.,' ...; .~. .; \' 'V \\:- y Traffic Data Service 1386 White Oaks Road, Suite 1 Campbell, CA 95008 tdSbuy@~s. com . File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : 2AMFINAL : 00000002 : 10/3/2006 : 1 StaFI Time Ri hi Factor .1.0 07:00AM' 55 07:15AM 78 07:30 AM 97 07:45 AM 92 Total 322 08:00 AM 76 152 0 0 228 0 0 0 0 0 83 212 0 1 296 30 0 126 0 156 680 08:15AM 77 191 0 0 268 0 0 0 0 0 82 226 0 1 309 42 0 145 0 187 764 08:30 AM 24 174 0 0 198 0 0 0 0 0 76 240 0 0 316 . 38 0 105 0 143 657 08:45 AM 71 214 0 0 285 0 0 0 0 0 80 287 0 0 367 44 0 185 0 229 881 Tolal 248 731 0 0 979 0 0 0 0 0 321 965 0 2 1288 154 0 561 0 715 2982 Gram! Total 1570 1236 0 0 18061 0 0 0 0 o I 587 1589 0 2 21781307 0 943 0 125015234 Apprch % 31.6 68.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 73 0 0.1 24.6 0 75.4 0 Tolal % 10.9 23.6 0 0 34.5 0 0 0 0 o 11.2 30.4 0 0 41.6 5.9 0 18 0 23.9 08:00 AM 76 152 0 0 228 0 0 0 0 0 83 212 0 1 296 30 0 126 0 156 680 08:15 AM 77191 0 0 268 0 0 0 0 0 82 226 0 1 309 42 0 145 0 187 764 08:30 AM 24 174 0 0 198 0 0 0 0 0 76 240 0 0 316 38 0 105 0 143 657 08:45 AM 71 214 0 0 285 0 0 0 0 0 80 287 0 0 367 44 0 185 0 229 881 Tolal Volume.. 248 731 0 0 979 0 0 0 0 0 321 965 0 2 1288 154 0 561 0 715 2982 % ADD. Tolal 25.3 74.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 24.9 74.9 0 0.2 21.5 0 78.5 0 PHF .805 .854 .000 .000 .859 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .967 .841 .000 .500 .877 .875 .000 .758 .000 . .781 .646 12~ J? 06, 62- 203. / )." 4-'3 1".___.______ - . Traffic Data Service 1386 White Oaks Road, Suite 1 Campbell, CA 95008 tdsbuy@:s.COffl File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : 2PMFINAL : 00000002 : 10/3/2006 : 1 Start Time Ri hi Factor 1.0 05:00 PM 64 . 05:15 PM 72 05:30 PM 65 05:45 PM 94 Total 295 06:00 PM 73 261 0 0 334 0 0 0 0 0 80 191 0 0 271 116 0 90 '0 206 811 06:15 PM 83 331 0 2 416 0 0 0 0 0 103 193 0 0 296 95 0 95 0 190 902 06:30 PM 43 312 O' 0 355 0 0 0 0 0 99 184 0 0 283 77 0 105 0 182 820 06:45 PM 103 384 0 0 487 0 0 0 0 0 103 171 0 0 274 82 0 170 0 252 1013 Total 302 1288 0 2 1592 0 0 0 0 0 385 739 0 0 1124 370 0 460 0 830 3546 Grand Total 1597 2255 '0 3 2855\ .0 0 0 0 01857 1504 0 0 2361\728 0 917 0 164516861 Apprch % 20.9 79 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 36.3 63.7 0 0 44,3 0 55.7 0 Total % 8.7 32.9 0 0 41.6 0 0 0 0 o 12.5 21.9 0 0 34.4 10.6 0 13.4 0 24 06:00 PM 73 261 0 0 334 0 0 0 0 0 80 191 0 0 271 116 0 90 o . 206 811 06:15 PM 83 331 0 2 416 0 0 0 0 0 103 193 0 0 296 95 0 95 0 190 ~02 06:30 PM 43 312 0 0 355 0 0 0 0 0 99 184 0 0 283 77 0 105 0 182 820 06:45 PM 103 384 0 0 487 0 0 0 0 0 103 171 0 0 274 82 0 170 0 252 1013 Tolal Volume 302 1288 0 2 1592 0 . 0 0 0 0 385 739. 0 0 1124 370 0 460 . 0 830 3546 % AM. Tolal 19 80.9 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 34.3 65.7 0 0 44.6 0 55.4 0 PHF .733 .839 .000 .250 .817 ,000 .000 ,000 .000 .000 .934 .957 .000 .000 .949 .797 .000 .676 ,000 .823 .875 ",;) ,.I". . . I" : (\ , /' I t4/;~S(02 209// ~4:; Traffic Data Service 1386 White Oaks Road, Suite 1 Campbell, CA 95008 fdsbaJ'~s.com File Name : 3AMFINAL Site Code : 00000003 Start Date : 1013/2006 Page No : 1 Start Time Ri hi Thru Factor 1.0 1,0 ~ 07:00 AM 22 4~) 07:15 AM 39 .84 IS, 07:30 AM 53 32 /140 772 ~ 07:45 AM 83 17 ! 160 901 :3<>0 Total 197 75/ 431 2656 08:00 AM '66 68 49 0 14 0 283 25( 187 56 0 268 12 126 3 208 942 ~ 08:15 AM 110 56 31 2 23 . 0 276 21 \ 152 27 .1 201 32 150 1 239 915 U 3 08:30 AM 90 50 55 0 8 1 239 33 \ 195) li1 0 279 32 122 0 270 983 >1- 3 08:45 AM 114 90 61 0 17 0 309 46' '168 80 6 300 37 79 5 185 1059 '2.(1 Total 380 264 196 2 62 1 1107 125 7.02 214 7 1048 113 477 9 902 3899 Grand Total 1577 548 327 15 14671393 1368 161 6 19281200 1133 343 11 16871195 776 484 18 .14731 6555 Apprch % 39.3 37.4 22.3 1 20.4 71 8.4 0.3 . 11.9 67.2 20.3 0.7 13.2 52.7 32.9 1.2 Total % 8.8 8.4 5 0.2 22.4 6 20.9 2.5 0.1 29.4 3.1 17.3 5.2 0.2 25.7 3 11.8 7.4 0.3 22.5 Grou s Printed- Vehicles 08:00 AM 66. 68 49 0 183 38 231 14 0 283 25 187 56 0 268 12 126 67 3 208 942 08:15AM 110 56 31 2 199 55 19B 23 0 276 21 152 27 1 201 32 150 56 1 239 915 08:30 AM 90 50 55 0 195 62 168 8 1 239 33 195 51 0 279 32 122 116 0 270 983 08:45 AM 114 90 61 0 255 49 243 17 0 309 46 168 80 6 300 37 79 '64 5 185 1059 TOlal Volume 3BO 264 196 2 842 204 840 62 1 1107 125 702 214 7 1048 113 477 303 9 902 3899 % ADO. Tolal 45.1 31.4 23.3 0.2 18.4 75.9 5.6 . 0.1 11.9 67 20.4 0.7 12.5 52.9 33.6 1 PHF .833 .733 .803 .250 .794 .823 .864 .674 .250 .896 .679 .900 .669 .292 .873 .764 .795 .653 .450 .635 .920 14) ~<14-, 01 204-/ J~/S t;,-.:=; I . -01 .. Traffic Data Service 1386 White Oaks Road, Suite 1 Campbell, CA 95008 ldsbay@,es.com File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : 3PMFINAL : 00000003 10/3/2006 1 Grou s Printed- Vehicles Start Time Ri hi Factor 1.0 05:00 PM 64 Z'3-+ 05:15 PM 118 CG I 05:30 PM 75 [. l' L. 05:45 PM 94 'l"l.q Total 351 ; ~-f 06:00 PM 102 215 54 10 381 i 67 172 42 4 285 6 175 45 113 2 457 1298 06:15 PM 115 226 78 0 419 74 198 26 1 299 1 155 43 97 1 404 1277 Lei 06:30 PM 104 239 63 0 406 , 66 177 35 0 278 0 134 19 80/ 2 232 1050 (3"'6 06:45 PM 121 205 49 0 375' 63 184 42 0 289 2 180 35 0 302 1146 7,V~ Total 442 885 244 10 1581 4~0 731 145 5 1151 9 644 142 5 1395 4771 Grand Tolal 1793 1646 558 11 30081584 1550 301 5 24401120 730 318 11 11791319 1904 9 3054)9681 Apprch % 26.4 54.7 18.6 0.4 23.9 63.5 12.3 0.2 10.2 61.9 27 0,9 10.4 62.3 0.3 Total % 8.2 17 5:8 0.1 31.1' 6 16 3.1 0.1 25.2 1.2 .7.5 3.3 0.1 12.2 3.3 19.7 0.1 31.~ 05:15 PM 118 182 100 1 401 82 198 40 0 320 12 73 26 0 111 67 285 106 1 459 1291 05:30 PM . 75 216 60 0 351 71 220 39 0 330 11 93 26 '1 131 32 249 108 1 390 1202 05:45 PM 94 21883 0 395 71 225 51 0 347 15 1094 9 1 174 25 264 118 0 407 1323 06:00 PM 102 215 54 10 381 67 172 42 4 285 19 107 43 6 175 45 297 113 2 457 1298 Tolal Volume 389 831 297 11 1528 291 815' 172 4 1282 57 382 144 8 591 169 1095 445 4 1713 5114 % Aoo. Tolal 25.5' 54.4' 19.4 0.7 22.7 63.6 13.4 0,3 9.6 64.6 24.4 1.4 9.9 63.9 26 0.2. PHF .824 .953 . .743 .275 .953 .887 .906 .843 .250 .924 .750 .876 .735 .333 .844 .631 .922 .943 .500 .933 .966 1-L.t)BQ4- .01 204- / 10P5 Traffic Data Service 1386 White Oaks Road, Suite 1 Campbell, CA 95008 tdsbay@}J:S.com File Name Site Code Start Date Page No 11AMFINAL : 00000011 : 10/3/2006 : 1 Grou s Printed- Vehicles Start Time Ri hi Factor 1.0 07:00 AM 56 07:15 AM 74 07:30 AM 88 07:45 AM 111 Total 329 08:00 AM 94 251 48 3 396 75 118 104 0 297 103 316 72 2 493 77 96 50 0 223 1409 08:15 AM 112 287 47 2 448 65 111 121 0 297 34 440 114 2 590 109 69 60 1 239 1574 08:30 AM I .81 276 46 0 403 55 78 91 0 224 32 487 87 2 608 77 108 50 2 237 1472 08:45 AM 86 189 52 0 327 69 131 124 0 324 52 385 98 3 538 79 92 61 0 232 1421 Total 373 1003. 193 5 1574 264 438 440 0 1142 221 1626 371 9 2229 342 365 221 3 931 5876 Grand Tot~1 1702 1906 313 8 2929\444 782 719 1 19461309 2750 678 26 37631636 566 368 11 1581110219 . Apprch % 24 65.1 10.7. 0.3 22.8 40.2 36.9 0.1 8.2 73.1 18 0.7 40.2 35.8 23.3 0.7 Total % 6.9 18.7 3.1 0.1 28.7 4.3 7.7 7 0 19 3 26.9 6.6 0.3 36.8 6.2 5.5 3..6 0.1 15.5 07:45 AM 111 32135 0 467 65 134 92 0 291 29 378 96 0 503 106 72 66 3 247 1508 08:00 AM 94 251 48 3 396 75 118 104 0 297 103 316 72 2 493 77 96 50 0 223 1409 08:15AM 112 287 47 2 448 65 111 121 0 297 34 440 114 2 590 109 69 60 1 239 1574 08:30 AM . 81 276 46 O' 403 55 78 91 0 224 32 487 87 2 60S 77 108 50 2 237 1472 Tolal Volume 398 1135 176 5 1714 260 441 408 0 1109 198 1621 369 6 2194 369 345 226 6 946 5963 % Aoo. Tala' 23.2 66.2 10.3 0.3 23.4 39.8 36.8 0 9 73.9 16.8 0.3 39 36.5 23.9 0.6 PHF .888 .884 .917 .417 .918 .867 .823 .843 .000 .934 .481 .832 .809 .750 .902 .846 .799 .856 .500 . .957 .947 it)3(P0,04- 2.11I\"=t L_ - Traffic Data Service 1386 White Oaks Road, Suite 1 Campbell, CA 95008 tdsbay@Cs.com File Name Site Code Start Date Page No : 11 PMFINAL : 00000011 : 1 0/3/2006 : 1 Start Time RI hi Factor 1.0 05:00 PM 63 05:15 PM 67 05:30 PM 52 05:45 PM 74 Total 256 06:00 PM 81 471 84 0 636 37 120 85 0 242 H2 323 171 2 668 93 146 46 1 286 1832 06:15 PM 95 487 101 0 6B3 31 113 85 0 229 201 30B' 139 19 667 B1 166 47 5 299 1878 06:30 PM 96 526 96 0 718 40 102 86 0 228 131 319 140 0 590 76 107 49 1 233 1769 06:45 PM 97 457 112 0 666 42 118 72 0 232 103 293 108 7 511 75 99 43 0 217 1626 Total 369 1941 393 0 2703 150 453 328 0 931 607 1243 55B 28 2436 325 518 185 7 1035 7105 Grand Tolal 1625 3720 705 0 50501295 88B 624 0 180711196 2411 1015 34 46561653 1021 342 25 2041 /13554 Apprch % 12.4 73.7 14 0 16.3 49.1 34.5 0 25.7 51.8 21.8 0.7 32 50 16.8 1.2 Total % . 4.6 27.4 5.2 0 37.3 2.2 6.6 4.6 0 13.3 8.8 17.8 7.5 0.3 34.4 4.8 7.5 2.5 0.2 15.1 05:45 PM 74 487 91 0 652 42 113 67 0 222 168 327 131 4 630 B3 142 41 6 272 1776 06:00 PM B1 471 84 0 636 37 120 85 0 242 172 323 171 2 668 93 146 46 1 286 1832 06:15 PM 95 4B7 101 0 683 31 113 85 0 229 201 308 139 19 667 81 166 47 5 299 1878 06:30 PM 96 526 96 0 718 40 102 86 0 228 131 319 140 0 590 76 107 49 1 233 1769 Total Volurn. 346 1971 372 0 2689 150 448 323 0 921 672 1277 581 25 2555 333 561 183 13 1090 7255 % ADD. Tolal 12.9 73.3 13.8, 0 16.3 48.6 35.1 0 26.3 50 22.7 1 30.6 51.5 16.8 1.2 PHF .901 .937 .921 .000 .936 .893 .933 .939 .000 .951 .836 .976 .849 .329 .956 .895 .845 .934 .542 .911 .966 7~3G>0.0t 2/4;)(olr AM Peak-Hour Volume Count Worksheet AUTO-CENSUS Traffic Monitoling and Analysis 870 Castlewood Dr. #1 Los Gatas, CA 95032 Phone 408-826-9673 Fax 408-877-162~ Dale: 7/17/07 Counter: Patti and Byron Intersection Name: Homestead Rd. and N. Blaney Ave. Weather: Clear .......- ........--..--... .._ _._..W' ....... . ........--..-....- N.orth A ,proach . Ea$t,AD~ roach S.o,uth'AI: Droach, . We$tA 'oro,ach' " ,.,' Start Time Right Thru Left Total Riaht Thru Left Total Riaht Thru Left Total Riaht Thru Left Total 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 0 0 0 0 0 66 9 75 20 0 18 38 8 48 0 56 7:30 0 0 0 0 0 173 19 192 36 0 39 75 23 100 0 123 7:45 0 0 0 0 0 297 31 328 67 0 73 140 33 175 0 208 8:00 0 0 0 0 0 434 53 487 105 0 122 227 41 282 0 323 8:15 0 0 0 0 0 592 78 670 143 0 200 343 56 385 0 441 8:30 0 0 0 0 0 742 99 841 183 0 238 421 81 496 0 577 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 914 125 1,039 243 0 310 553 100 663 0 763 9:00 0 0 0 0 0 1,159 151 1,310 287 0 353 640 124 813 0 937 N H d N.BI Rd H d Peakliour Right Ihru Left Total Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Le.ft: Total Right Thru Left Total PK Hour 7:00 - 8:00 0 0 0 Ci 0 434 53 487 105 0 122 227 41 282 0 323 1,037 7:15 - 8:15 0 0 0 0 0 526 69 595 123 0 182 305 48 337 0 385 1,285 7:30 - 8:30 0 0 0 0 0 569 80 649 147 0 199 346 58 396 0 454 1 ,449 7:45 - 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 617 94 711 176 0 237 413 67 488 0 555 1,679 8:00 - 9:00 0 0 0 0 0 725 98 823 182 0 231 413 83 531 0 614 1,850 Peak Volumes: 0 0 0 0 0 725 98 823 182 0 231 413 83 531 0 614 1,850 Cut and Paste None' "tJ .. $ VI <1l E o :c Out ill Total 0 0 0 Riaht Thru Left 0 0 0 ~I 0 31 ~ .... I~ ,... 0 . 0 01 on '" .... 0> .EI "<t ~I ;;; .... I~ co IS" .... '" '" co It) 01 '" 81 <D ~ '" I~ ::1 I~ on <D 0> 00 co '" 231 0 182 Left Thru Riaht 181 413 594 Out ill Total :c o 3 III II> .. III C. N. Blaney Rd. PM Peak-Hour Volume Count Worksheet AUTO-CENSUS Traffic Monitoring and Analysis 870 Castlewood Dr. #1 Los Gatos, CA 95032 Phone 408-826-9673 Fax 408-877-162~ Date: 7/17/07 Counter: Matt and Jayme Intersection Name: Homestead Rd. and N. Blaney AYe. Weather: Clear - ----- .n____ ---" ..-..... -.-..- ...-. . .-...--.--- - --- . . North,A mroach EastA61i roach 'S.outh A[ rQach . ',' We,slA )p~o,ach, Start Time Right Thru Left Total Rioht Thru Left Total Rioht Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Total 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 125 26 151 20 0 35 55 36 142 0 178 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 264 49 313 41 0 60 101 68 275 0 343 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 387 76 463 78 0 93 171 114 429 0 543 5:00 0 0 0 0 0 521 112 633 119 0 125 244 155 603 0 758 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 683 151 834 169 0 145 314 207 860 0 1,067 5:30 0 0 0 0 0 845 182 1,027 203 0 175 378 250 1,052 0 1,302 5:45 0 0 0 0 0 1,039 236 1,275 246 0 203 449 294 1,303 0 1,597 6:00 0 0 0 0 0 1,202 290 1,492 277 0 233 510 348 1,517 0 1,865 N H tead Rd North BI A H d Rd l'eakHour ~I9ht . Thru 'I,.eft Total' .Rjght Thru left 'Total 'Right Thru "'le6 'rotlil' . Right Thru 'Left Total PK Hour 4:00 - 5:00 0 0 0 0 0 521 112 633 119 0 125 244 155 603 0 758 1,635 4:15 - 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 558 125 683 149 0 110 259 171 718 0 889 1,831 4:30 - 5:30 0 0 0 0 0 581 133 714 162 0 115 277 182 777 0 959 1,950 4:45 - 5:45 0 0 0 0 0 652 160 812 168 0 110 278 180 874 0 1,054 2,144 5:00 - 6:00 0 0 0 0 0 681 178 859 158 0 108 266 193 914 0 1,107 2,232 Peak Volumes: 0 0 0 0 0 681 178 859 158 0 108 266 193 914 0 1107 2.232 Cut and Paste None .,; ~ '0 <0 $ "' QJ E o J: Out ill Total 0 0 0 Rioht Thru Left 0 0 0 ~I U> 31 ~ -" I~ 0> co . co U> ~ co ~ T'" !!!. ... ~I ~ 0> I~ 00 EI co 15" ": 0; 00 01 .... -" 10 81 0> i M -" I~ -" I~ co 00 0> ~ ~ ... .... 00 '" 10B 0 158 Left Thru Rioht 371 266 637 Out ill Total J: o 3 <0 III Iii III a. ;V po North Blaney Ave. AM Peak-Hour Volume Count Worksheet AUTO-CENSUS Traffic Monitoring and Analysis 870 Castlewood Dr. # 1 Los Gatos, CA 95032 Phone 408-826-9673 Fax 408-877-162! Date: 7/17/07 Counter: Jane and Logan Intersection Name: Homestead and Wolfe Weather: Clear NorthA ooroach, EastADDroaCh South'Ar roach West A IDroach . Start Time RiQht Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Total Riaht Thru Left Total 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 7 102 6 115 6 48 30 84 25 115 35 175 24 39 16 79 7:30 16 232 16 264 21 109 72 202 67 254 69 390 46 85 27 158 7:45 26 422 36 484 42 202 123 367 118 406 128 652 78 158 49 285 8:00 45 574 51 670 57 282 164 503 180 557 167 904 122 255 65 442 8:15 62 777 80 919 73 384 216 673 237 779 215 1,231 180 340 90 610 8:30 74 921 106 1,101 92 477 252 821 288 972 280 1,540 213 436 113 762 8:45 97 1,122 140 1,359 119 589 314 1,022 360 1,219 352 1,931 271 565 149 985 9:00 113 1,289 164 1,566 132 733 357 1,222 432 1,411 406 2,249 310 688 188 1,186 Wolfe Rd. Homestead Rd Wolfe Rd Homestead Rd Pe.ak Hour ~jght Thtu Left Total Right Thru . 'Left Total Right Thru. c Left. Total.... Right Thtu Left Total PK Hour 7:00 - 8:00 45 574 51 670 57 282 164 503 180 557 167 904 122 255 65 442 2,519 7:15-8:15 55 675 74 804 67 336 186 589 212 664 180 1,056 156 301 74 531 2,980 7:30 - 8:30 58 689 90 837 71 368 180 619 221 718 211 1,150 167 351 86 604 3,210 7:45 - 8:45 71 700 104 875 77 387 191 655 242 813 224 1,279 193 407 100 700 3,509 8:00 - 9:00 68 715 113 896 75 451 193 719 252 854 239 1,345 188 433 123 744 3,704 Peak Volumes: 68 715 113 896 75 451 193 719 252 854 239 1,345 188 433 123 744 3,704 Cut and Paste ,j 0:: 1:1 '" 2 '" CII E o :I: Out In Total 1,052 896 1,948 Ri.9h1 Thru Left 68 715 113 21 '" ~I M ~ -" lot 0 N . ..... Ul (!. l/') Ul -" [ .... .... ..... .sl "" ~I M ~ I[ ..... 15' "" M Ul -" ..... "" -" CD 81 00 ~ 00 -" I~ ..... I~ l/') 00 CD CD ..... .... '" co 239 854 252 Left Thru Riaht 1,096 1,345 2,441 Out In Total Wolfe Rd. :I: o 3 <II It QI Co ;ll ?- Wolfe Rd. PM Peak-Hour Volume Count Worksheet AUTO-CENSUS Traffic Monitoring and Analysis 870 Castlewood Dr. #1 Los Gatos, CA 95032 Phone 408-826-9673 Fax 408-877-162~ Date: 7/17/07 Counter: Kevin So and Huy Intersection Name: Wolfe Rd. and Homestead. Rd. Weather: Clear ,NortbAllllr()ach " E.a.s,t AD~ rl>ach S,l>uthA[ Ilroach ,WestA )D(l>8Ch, Start Time Rlaht Thru Left Total Richt Thru Left Total Richt Thru Left Total Riaht Thru Left Tl>tal 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 26 188 23 237 17 114 42 173 37 120 39 196 38 109 31 178 4:30 45 405 57 507 41 227 98 366 55 221 106 382 72 206 50 328 4:45 63 638 99 800 66 317 151 534 84 367 159 610 122 316 76 514 5:00 83 845 132 1,060 85 407 194 686 114 509 206 829 166 414 110 690 5:15 98 1,087 171 1,356 109 530 278 917 140 657 267 1,064 218 553 156 927 5:30 136 1,389 203 1,728 131 677 357 1,165 179 844 345 1,368 279 700 192 1,171 5:45 193 1,663 247 2,103 146 816 436 1,398 210 1,002 414 1,626 328 844 225 1,397 6:00 229 1,972 290 2,491 174 981 525 1,680 232 1,162 466 1,860 378 970 268 1,616 Wolfe Rd. Homestead. Rd Wolfe Rd. Homestead. Rd Peak Ho.ut 'Right Thru Left TO.tal Right Thtu Left Total Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Total PK Hour 4:00 - 5:00 83 845 132 1,060 85 407 194 686 114 509 206 829 166 414 110 690 3,265 4:15 - 5:15 72 899 148 1,119 92 416 236 744 103 537 228 868 180 444 125 749 3,480 4:30 - 5:30 91 984 146 1,221 90 450 259 799 124 623 239 986 207 494 142 843 3,849 4:45 - 5:45 130 1,025 148 1,303 80 499 285 864 126 635 255 1,016 206 528 149 883 4,066 5:00 - 6:00 146 1,127 158 1,431 89 574 331 994 118 653 260 1,031 212 556 158 926 4,382 Peak Volumes: 146 1,127 158 1,431 89 574 331 994 118 653 260 1,031 212 556 158 926 4382 Cut and Paste '0 0::: -0 III S I/) QI E o :r Out ill Total 900 1431 2,331 Richt Thru Left 146 1127 158 JgI to ~I "" i ..... I~ co 00 0> {!. OJ LO . to N ..... ~ 01 .51 to ~I (() 01 I~ to 15' N LO .... to 01 LO ~ ~ 81 co ~ N t.ol I~ 0> I~ 00 ..- t.ol t.ol OJ N ..... N 260 653 118 Left Thru Riaht 1,670 1,031 2,701 Out ill Total Wolfe Rd. :r o 3 <I> !!l. <I> Ql P. ;0 Co Wolfe Rd. AM Peak-Hour Volume Count Worksheet AUTO-CENSUS Traffic Monitoring and Analysis 870 Castlewood Dr. # 1 Los Gatos, CA 95032 Phone 408-826-9673 Fax 408-877-162~ Date: 7/17/07 Counter: Alvan and NQOC Intersection Name: Wolfe and Pruneridge Weather: Clear ........- - .-.......-- .... _'_H"" . . -..-..- - , North A lproach 'East Apllro,a,<:h S.outh A~ prQa<:h '. , W~st A lp~oa<:h .. Start Time Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Total 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 1 170 7 178 6 3 21 30 40 181 10 231 12 4 4 20 7:30 6 351 14 371 23 7 37 67 '79 414 19 512 20 9 11 40 7:45 11 607 21 639 37 9 70 116 135 651 31 817 35 15 14 64 8:00 18 867 39 924 57 11 116 184 205 940 55 1,200 62 24 21 107 8:15 19 1,111 58 1,188 80 13 158 251 285 1,229 67 1,581 79 41 29 149 8:30 22 1,393 71 1,486 103 17 198 318 386 1,536 90 2,012 102 51 40 193 8:45 27 1,695 90 1,812 124 23 238 385 476 1,903 118 2,497 134 54 51 239 9:00 30 1,961 103 2,094 138 32 280 450 590 2,289 145 3,024 152 55 65 272 PeakHQur ~ight Thru I.eft Total Right Thru 'Left Total Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Total PK Hour 7:00 - 8:00 18 867 39 924 57 11 116 184 205 940 55 1,200 62 24 21 107 2,415 7:15 - 8:15 18 941 51 1,010 74 10 137 221 245 1,048 57 1,350 67 37 25 129 2,710 7:30 - 8:30 16 1,042 57 1,115 80 10 161 251 307 1,122 71 1,500 82 42 29 153 3,019 7:45 - 8:45 16 1,088 69 1,173 87 14 168 269 341 1,252 87 1,680 99 39 37 175 3,297 8:00 - 9:00 12 1,094 64 1,170 81 21 164 266 385 1,349 90 1,824 90 31 44 165 3,425 Peak Volumes: 12 1,094 64 1,170 81 21 164 266 385 1349 90 1,824 90 31 44 165 3,425 Cut and Paste Wolfe QI 01 :E Cii c: :l a: Out In Total 1,474 1170 2,644 Right Thru Left 12 1094 64 ~I <0 ~I "<t 00 ~ .... Ii <0 "<t . ... -I>> N 0> 051 It) ~I .- '" I~ '" l:r to M ... 0> .- 0> 81 M ~ <:> ... Ii -I>> I~ N 0> 0> co .- -I>> <:> 90 1349 385 Left Thru Riuht 1,348 1,824 3,172 Out In Total --- .- " ., C :l II> ., 0: 10 II> Wolfe PM Peak.Hour Volume Count Worksheet AUTO-CENSUS Traffic Monitoring and Analysis 870 Castlewood Dr. #1 Los Gatos, CA 95032 Phone 408-826-9673 Fax 408-877-162~ Date: 7/17/07 Counler: ShaUiland Kristen Intersection Name: Wolfe Rd. and Pruneridae Ave. Weather: Clear .......n_ 0'_"_"_ '"' .-_..11; . .-..-..- .... North A loroach East Ao~ roach South. AI oroach West A ooroach Start Time Riaht Thru Left Total Riaht Thru Left Total Riaht Thru Left Total Rioht Thru Left Total 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 6 237 22 265 14 4 72 90 29 207 41 277 27 3 7 37 4:30 11 484 35 530 25 11 131 167 53 392 94 539 60 5 15 80 4:45 19 723 49 791 34 18 183 235 85 601 132 818 84 8 22 114 5:00 22 968 82 1,072 46 31 274 351 119 808 181 1,108 118 9 28 155 5:15 27 1,293 102 1,422 54 38 380 472 157 1,008 225 1,390 144 10 34 188 5:30 32 1,664 117 1,813 70 50 487 607 208 1,247 262 1,717 171 13 41 225 5:45 39 1,931 151 2,121 76 59 596 731 257 1,497 307 2,061 207 18 47 272 6:00 46 2,283 200 2,529 83 72 689 844 296 1,750 352 2,398 234 23 52 309 Wolf, P 'd Wolf, P 'd Peak H.our Right . -Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Total Right Thru Left Total PK Hour 4:00 - 5:00 22 968 82 1,072 46 31 274 351 119 808 181 1,108 118 9 28 155 2,686 4:15 - 5:15 21 1,056 80 1,157 40 34 308 382 128 801 184 1,113 117 7 27 151 2,803 4:30 - 5:30 21 1,180 82 1,283 45 39 356 440 155 855 168 1,178 111 8 26 145 3,046 4:45 - 5:45 20 1,208 102 1,330 42 41 413 496 172 896 175 1,243 123 10 25 158 3,227 5:00 - 6:00 24 1,315 118 1,457 37 41 415 493 177 942 171 1,290 116 14 24 154 3,394 Peak Volumes: 24 1,315 118 1457 37 41 415 493 177 942 171 1,290 116 14 24 154 3,394 Cut and Paste OJ 01 :g OJ c:: ::I Ii: . ~ -..- Out ill Total 1,003 1457 2,460 Riaht Thru Left 24 1315 118 191 0 ~I -.t w ~ 00 I~ (3. (1) N . ... 0 M '" EI -.t ~I -.t ~ I~ .1>0 15' lO ID ... ... w 81 to ~ to .1>0 " w I~ M ... .... ~ 0 N ... U1 ID 171 942 177 Left Thru Riaht 1,846 1,290 3,136 Out ill Total ... - ."'~ Wolfe ~ t: :J II> ., c: 10 II> Wolfe wendix B level of Service Calculations COMPARE F ri Ocl 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3. 1 level Of Service Compulation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing AM Intersection #1: De Anza/Homestead Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 398 1135m 176 lanes: 0 1 2 0 2 ..-J4.~~ Signal=Protecl Signal =Protect Final Vol: lanes: Rights=lncluCle Vol Cnt Date: 1 013/2006 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle Time (see): 118 ~ 226 2 260 ~ loss Time (see): 0 J- 0 0 345 2 -... Critical VlC: 0.758 ....- 2 441 r Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 40.1 1= 0 369'" Avg Delay (sec/veh): 34.7 2 408." LOS: C ~ ~ t .,. r+ lanes: 2 0 3 0 Final Vol: 369'.' 1621 198 Signal=ProtecVRights=lnctude De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11--------------,...11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ____________1_______________11_______________11_______________11_______________1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << AM Peak Base Vol: 369 1621 198 176 1135 398 226 345 369 408 441 260 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 369 1621 198 176 1135 398 226 345 369 408 441 260 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 369 1621 198 176 1135 398 226 345 369 408 441 260 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 369 1621 198 176 1135 398 226 345 369 408 441 260 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 369 1621 198 176 1135 398 226 345 369 408 441 260 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 369 1621 198 176 1135 398 226 345 369 408 441 260 ____________1_______________11_______________11_______________11_______________1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.87 0.87 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.22 0.78 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 5187 1615 3502 3691 1294 3502 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.31 0.12 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.06 0.10 0.23 0.12 0.12 0.16 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.14 Volume/Cap: 0.76 Uniform Del: 48.9 IncremntDel: 6.8 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 55.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 55.7 LOS by Move: E HCM2kAvgQ: 8 Street Name: Approach: Movement: 0.47 0.67 24.2 0.7 0.0 1. 00 24.9 1. 00 24.9 C 17 0.47 0.26 18.9 0.2 0.0 1. 00 19.1 1. 00 19.1 B 4 **** 0.08 0.67 53.1 6.3 0.0 1. 00 59.4 1. 00 59.4 E 4 0.41 0.76 30.1 1.7 0.0 1. 00 31.8 1. 00 31. 8 C 19 0.41 0.76 30.1 1.7 0.0 1. 00 31.8 1. 00 31.8 C 19 0.13 0.50 47.7 0.8 0.0 1. 00 48.6 1. 00 48.6 D 4 0.30 0.32 31. 8 0.2 0.0 1. 00 32.0 1. 00 32.0 C 5 **** 0.30 0.76 37.3 6.8 0.0 1. 00 44.1 1. 00 44.1 D 14 **"** 0.15 0.76 47.8 6.2 0.0 1. 00 54.0 1. 00 54.0 D 9 0.32 0.38 30.6 0.2 0.0 1. 00 30.8 1. 00 30.8 C 6 0.32 0.50 32.0 0.7 0.0 1. 00 32.8 1. 00 32.8 C 8 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3- 2 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operalions {Future Volume Alternative} Background AM Intersection #1: De Anza/Homestead Signal=ProlecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 400 1168'" 178 Lanes: 01202 ~4~}''+ Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: , 0/3/2006 Rights=tnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j Cycle Time (sec): 118 ~ 232 2 261 ~ Loss Time (sec): 0 J- 0 0 348 2 ----.... Critical VlC: 0.787 ...- 2 442 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 41.7 r 399'" Avg Delay (seclveh): 35.6 2 416'" LOS: 0 ~ +t t ~ ~ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 Final Vol: 375'" 1634 200 Signal=ProtecVRighls=lncl ude Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11----.:.----------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << AM Peak Base Vol: 369 1621 198 176 1135 398 226 345 369 408 441 260 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 369 1621 198 176 1135 398 226 345 369 408 441 260 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Tr: 6 13 2 2 33 2 6 3 30 8 1 1 Initial Fut: 375 1634 200 178 1168 400 232 348 399 416 442 261 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 375 1634 200 178 1168 400 232 348 399 416 442 261 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 375 1634 200 178 1168 400 232 348 399 416 442 261 peE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 375 1634 200 178 1168 400 232 348 399 416 442 261 _nn_n_n_I__nnnn_nn 1 I-nn-nnn---I 1 nnnn__n_n Ilnnn-n-n---1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.23 0.77 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 5187 1615 3502 3717 1273 3502 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.32 0.12 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.07 0.10 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.16 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.14 Volume/Cap: 0.79 Uniform Del: 49.3 IncremntDel: 8.5 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 57.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 57.8 LOS by Move: E HCM2kAvgQ: 9 0.46 0.68 25.0 0.8 0.0 1. 00 25.9 1. 00 25.9 C 17 0.46 0.27 19.6 0.2 0.0 1. 00 19.8 1. 00 19.8 B 4 0.07 0.68 53.3 7.3 0.0 1. 00 60.6 1. 00 60.6 E 5 0.40 0.79 31.1 2.2 0.0 1. 00 33.2 1. 00 33.2 C 20 **** 0.40 0.79 31.1 2.2 0.0 1. 00 33.2 1. 00 33.2 C 20 0.14 0.49 47.3 0.8 0.0 1. 00 48.1 1. 00 48.1 D 5 0.31 0.31 30.7 0.2 0.0 1. 00 30.9 1. 00 30.9 c 5 0.31 0.79 36.9 8.0 0.0 1. 00 44.9 1. 00 44.9 D 15 **** **** 0.33 0.49 31.6 0.7 0.0 1. 00 32.3 1. 00 32.3 C 8 Traffrx 7.8.0915 Copyright {cl 2005 Dowling Associales, Inc. 0.15 0.79 48.3 7.7 0.0 1. 00 56.0 1. 00 56.0 E 9 0.33 0.37 30.2 0.2 0.0 1. 00 30.4 1. 00 30.4 C 6 Licensed 10 Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3. 3 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Projecl AM Intersection #1: De Anza/Homestead Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 400 1168'" 180 Lanes: 01202 .-J4.~'+ Signal=Prolecl Signal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 10/3/2006 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle Time (see): 118 ~ 232 2 262 -t Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 0 350 2 ----... Critical V/C: 0.787 -<Ilf- 2 443 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 41.7 1= 399'" Avg Delay (seclveh): 35.7 2 417'" LOS: 0 ~ ~ t ~ r+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 Final Vol: 375'" 1634 202 Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------I---------------II---------n----II n_______nn__ II n_____________1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << AM Peak Base Vol: 375 1634 200 178 1168 400 232 348 399 416 442 261 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 375 1634 200 178 1168 400 232 348 399 416 442 261 Added Vol: 0 D 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 375 1634 202 180 1168 400 232 350 399 417 443 262 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 375 1634 202 180 1168 400 232 350 399 417 443 262 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 375 1634 202 180 1168 400 232 350 399 417 443 262 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 375 1634 202 180 1168 400 232 350 399 417 443 262 ------------I---------------II--------nn--- II ___________n__ II n___________n 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.23 0.77 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 5187 1615 3502 3717 1273 3502 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------1---------------1 I----n---nn--I I------n-------I 1---- ___n______1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.32 0.13 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.07 0.10 0.25 0.12 0.12 0.16 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.14 Volume/Cap: 0.79 Uniform Del: 49.3 IncremntDe1: 8.5 InitQueuDe1: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 57.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 57.8 LOS by Move: E HCM2kAvgQ: 9 0.46 0.68 25.1 0.8 0.0 1. 00 26.0 1. 00 26.0 C 18 0.46 0.27 19.7 0.2 0.0 1. 00 19.9 1. 00 19.9 B 4 **** 0.08 0.68 53.2 7.3 0.0 1. 00 60.5 1. 00 60.5 E 5 0.40 0.79 31.1 2.2 0.0 1. 00 33.2 1. 00 33.2 C 20 0.40 0.79 31.1 2.2 0.0 1. 00 33.2 1. 00 33.2 C 20 0.13 0;49 47.3 0.8 0.0 1. 00 48.1 1. 00 48.1 D 5 0.31 0.31 30.8 0.2 0.0 1. 00 30.9 1. 00 30.9 C 5 **** 0.31 0.79 36.9 8.0 . 0.0 1. 00 44.9 1. 00 44.9 D 15 **** 0.15 0.79 48.3 7.7 0.0 1. 00 56.0 1. DO 56.0 E 9 0.33 0.37 30.2 0.2 0.0 1. 00 30.4 1. 00 30.4 C 6 0.33 0.49 31.6 0.7 0.0 1. 00 32.3 1. 00 32.3 C 8 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Oowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:02:502007 Page 3. 4 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Future Growth AM Intersection #1: De Anza/Homestead Signal=ProtecVRights=lncl ude Final Vol: 414 1209". 186 Lanes: 0 1 2 0 2 ~4t~~ Signal=Prolect Signal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: nla Rights=lnctude Lanes: Final Vol: J. Cycle Time (sec): 118 ~ 240 2 271 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 0 362 2 -... Critical VlC: 0.815 +- 2 459 0 =r Avg Crit Del (seelveh): 43.2 1= 0 412". Avg Delay (seelveh): 36.6 2 432... LOS: D ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 Final Vol: 38B". 1692 209 Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ____________1 _______________11 --------------- 11_______________11 --------------- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 388 1692 209 186 1209 414 240 362 412 432 459 271 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 388 1692 209 186 1209 414 240 362 412 432 459 271 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 388 1692 209 186 1209 414 240 362 412 432 459 271 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 388 1692 209 186 1209 414 240 362 412 432 459 271 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 388 1692 209 186 1209 414 240 362 412 432 459 271 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 388 1692 209 186 1209 414 240 362 412 432 459 271 ----~-------I --------------- II _______________11_______________11 --------------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.23 0.77 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 5187 1615 3502 3717 1273 3502 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------ 1_______________11 --------------- II --------------- II _______________1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.33 0.13 0.05 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.10 0.26 0.12 0.13 0.17 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.14 Volume/Cap: 0.81 Uniform Del: 49.5 IncrernntDel: 10.4 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 59.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 59.9 LOS by Move: E HCM2kAvgQ: 9 0.46 0.71 25.5 1.0 0.0 1. 00 26.5 1. 00 26.5 C 19 0.46 0.28 19.7 0.2 0.0 1. 00 19.9 1. 00 19.9 B 5 **** 0.07 0.71 53.3 8.6 0.0 1. 00 62.0 1. 00 62.0 E 5 0.40 0.81 31.6 2.7 0.0 1. 00 34.3 1. 00 34.3 C 21 0.40 0.81 31.6 2.7 0.0 1. 00 34.3 1. 00 34.3 C 21 0.13 0.51 47.4 0.9 0.0 1. 00 48.3 1. 00 48.3 D 5 0.31 0.32 30.9 0.2 0.0 1. 00 31.1 1. 00 31.1 C 5 **** 0.31 0.81 37.4 9.8 0.0 1. 00 47.2 1. 00 47.2 D 16 **** 0.15 0.81 48.5 9.4 0.0 1. 00 57.9 1. 00 57.9 E 10 0.33 0.39 30.4 0.2 0.0 1. 00 30.6 1. 00 30.6 C 7 0.33 0.51 31.8 0.8 0.0 1. 00 32.6 1. 00 32.6 C 8 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3- 5 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing AM Intersection #2: Homestead/Blaney Signal=ProlecVRights=lndude Final Vol: 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 ~4+~~ Signal=ProteCl Slgnal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: 7/1712007 Rights=lnclude Lanes: FlOal Vol: -.f Cycle Time (see): 100 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 0 531'" -. Critical V/C: 0.356 ..- 2 725 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 20.3 1= 0 83 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 15.8 98'- LOS: B ~ ~ t ~ r+ Lanes: 1 0 0 0 Final Vol: 231-- 0 182 Signal=ProtecVRights= Include Blaney Avenue Homestead Road North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << AM Peak Base Vol: 231 0 182 0 0 0 0 531 83 98 725 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 231 0 182 0 0 0 0 531 83 98 725 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 231 0 182 0 0 0 0 531 83 98 725 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 231 0 182 0 0 0 0 531 83 98 725 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 231 0 182 0 0 0 0 531 83 98 725 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 231 0 182 0 0 0 0 531 83 98 725 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.73 0.27 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 3060 478 1805 3610 0 ____________1 n_____________11 n_____________II_____________n II n_________n__1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.05 0.20 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.36 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.36 0.00 Uniform Del: 23.5 0.0 IncremntDe1: 0.3 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 23.8 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.8 0.0 LOS by Move: C A HCM2kAvgQ: 5 0 Street Name: Approach: Movement: 0.36 0.31 23.1 0.3 0.0 1. 00 23.4 1. 00 23.4 C 4 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.49 0.36 15.9 0.1 0.0 1. 00 16.0 1. 00 16.0 B 6 **** 0.49 0.36 15.9 0.1 0.0 1. 00 16.0 1. 00 16.0 B 6 **** 0.15 0.36 38.0 0.8 0.0 1. DO 38.8 1. 00 38.8 D 3 0.64 0.31 8.1 0.1 0.0 1. 00 8.2 1. 00 8.2 A 5 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3. 6 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background AM Intersection #2: Homestead/Blaney Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 ~4.~~ Signal=Protecl Signal=Prolect Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol ent Dale: 7/1712007 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Fmai Vol: ..f Cycle Time (sec): 100 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 0 533'" -... Critical V/C: 0.358 -<Ill- 2 726 =r Avg Crit Del [sec/veh): 20.3 r 0 84 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 15.9 98'" LOS: B ~ ~ t t-- ~ Lanes: 0 0 0 Final Vol: 233'" 0 182 Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Street Name: Blaney Avenue Homes tead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ____________1_______________11 _______________11 _______________11 --------------- 1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << AM Peak Base Vol: 231 0 182 0 0 0 0 531 83 98 725 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Ese: 231 0 182 0 0 0 0 531 83 98 725 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Tr: 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 Initial Fut: 233 0 182 0 0 0 0 533 84 98 726 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 233 0 182 0 0 0 0 533 84 98 726 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 233 0 182 0 0 0 0 533 84 98 726 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 233 0 182 0 0 0 0 533 84 98 726 0 ____________1_______________11_______________11 _______________11_______________1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.73 0.27 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 3056 482 1805 3610 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.05 0.20 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.36 Volume/Cap: 0.36 Uniform Del: 23.5 IncremntDel: 0.3 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 23.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.8 LOS by Move: C HCM2kAvgQ: 5 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.36 0.31 23.0 0.3 0.0 1. 00 23.3 1. 00 23.3 C 4 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.49 0.36 15.9 0.1 0.0 1. 00 16.0 1. 00 16.0 B 6 **** 0.49 0.36 15.9 0.1 0.0 1. 00 16.0 1. 00 16.0 B 6 **** 0.15 0.36 38.0 0.8 0.0 1. 00 38.8 1. 00 38.8 D 3 0.64 0.31 8.1 0.1 0.0 1. 00 8.2 1. 00 8.2 A 5 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o Trafflx 7.B.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Ocl 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3- 7 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) . Project AM Intersection #2: Homestead/Blaney Signal =ProlecURighls=lnclude Final Vol: 0 0 0 Lanes: 00 0 00 ~4~~~ Signal=Protecl Signal =Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnl Dale: 7/1712007 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j Cycle Time (see): 100 ~ 0 0 0 0 --t Loss Time (see): J.- 0 0 538." -.. Cntical VlC: 0.359 ...- 2 729 r Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 20.2 1= 0 84 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 15.8 98.'. LOS: B ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 0 0 0 1 Final Vol: 233... 0 182 Signal=ProlecURights=lnclude Street Name: Blaney Avenue Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << AM Peak Base Vol: 233 0 182 0 0 0 0 533 84 98 726 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 233 0 182 0 0 0 0 533 84 98 726 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 233 0 182 0 0 0 0 538 84 98 729 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 PHF Volume: 233 0 182 0 0 0 0 538 84 98 729 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 233 0 182 0 0 0 0 538 84 98 729 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 233 0 182 0 0 0 0 538 84 98 729 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.73 0.27 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 3060 478 1805 3610 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.05 0.20 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.36 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.36 0.00 Uniform Del: 23.6 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 23.9 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.9 0.0 LOS by Move: C A HCM2kAvgQ: 5 0 0.36 0.31 23.1 0.3 0.0 1. 00 23.4 1. 00 23.4 C 4 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.49 0.36 15.8 0.1 0.0 1. 00 15.9 1. 00 15.9 B 6 **** 0.49 0.36 15.8 0.1 0.0 1. 00 15.9 1. 00 15.9 B 6 **** 0.15 0.36 38.1 0.8 0.0 1. 00 38.9 1. 00 38.9 D 3 0.64 0.32 8.1 0.1 0.0 1. 00 8.2 1. 00 8.2 A 5 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed 10 Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 0512:02:50 2007 Page 3. 8 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HeM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Future Growth AM Intersection #2: Homestead/Blaney Signal =ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 ~4+~~ Signal=Prolect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: nla Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J. Cycle TIme (see): 100 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ Loss Time (see): ~ 0 0 557"" 1 ----JIto- Crllical VlC: 0.372 -0lil- 2 755 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 20.4 T 0 87 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 16.0 102'" LOS: B ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 0 0 0 Final Vol: 241'" 0 189 Signal =ProtecVRights=lnclude Street Name: Blaney Avenue Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------1 ] ---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 241 0 189 0 0 0 0 557 87 102 755 0 Growth Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 241 0 189 0 0 0 0 557 87 102 755 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 241 0 189 0 0 0 0 557 87 102 755 0 User Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Volume: 241 0 189 0 0 0 0 557 87 102 755 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 241 0 189 0 0 0 0 557 87 102 755 0 PCE Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Final Vol. : 241 0 189 0 0 0 0 557 87 102 755 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1. 00 0.85 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 1. 00 Lanes: 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 73 0.27 1. 00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat. : 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 3060 478 1805 3610 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.21 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.36 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.15 0.64 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.37 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.33 0.00 Uniform Del: 23.7 0.0 23.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.9 15.9 38.1 8.1 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 24.1 0.0 23.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.1 16.1 39.0 8.2 0.0 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 24.1 0.0 23.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.1 16.1 39.0 8.2 0.0 LOS by Move: C A C A A A A B B D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 6 3 5 0 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed 10 Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3- 9 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HeM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing AM Intersection #3: HomesteadlWolfe Signal =ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Val: 68 715 113'" Lanes: 01202 ..v4t~~ Signal=Protect Signal=ProlecL Final Val: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Val Cnt Dale: 7/1712007 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Val: J- Cycle TIme (see): 120 +- 123 0 75 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 J- 0 433'" 2 ~ Critical V/C: 0.496 +- 451 0 r Avg Crit DeL (seclveh): 31.5 1= 0 188 Avg Delay (seclveh): 32.1 193'" LOS: C ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Val: 239 854'" 252 Signal=ProtecVRighls=lnclude Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ t ---------------11--------------- t t ---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << AM Peak Base Vol: 239 854 252 113 715 68 123 433 188 193 451 75 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 239 854 252 113 715 68 123 433 188 193 451 75 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 239 854 252 113 715 68 123 433 188 193 451 75 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 239 854 252 113 715 68 123 433 188 193 451 75 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 239 854 252 113 715 68 123 433 188 193 451 75 PCE Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 239 854 252 113 715 68 123 433 188 193 451 75 ------------1--------------- t 1---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.93 0.93 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.74 0.26 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.71 0.29 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1615 3502 4675 445 1805 3610 1615 1805 3030 504 ------------1---------------1 t ---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.24 0.16 0.03 0.15 0.15 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.48 Volume/Cap: 0.41 0.50 Uniform Del: 44.6 21.5 IncrernntDel: 0.5 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 45.1 21.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 45.1 21.7 LOS by Move: D C HCM2kAvgQ: 4 11 0.48 0.33 19.4 0.2 0.0 1. 00 19.7 1. 00 19.7 B 6 0.07 0.50 54.2 1.7 0.0 1. 00 55.9 1. 00 55.9 E 3 **** 0.37 0.41 27.7 0.1 0.0 1. 00 27.8 1. 00 27.8 C 8 0.37 0.41 27.7 0.1 0.0 1. 00 27.8 1. 00 27.8 C 8 0.14 0.47 47.2 1.4 0.0 1. 00 48.6 1. 00 48.6 D 5 0.24 0.50 39.2 0.4 0.0 1. 00 39.6 1. 00 39.6 D 7 **** 0.24 0.48 39.0 0.9 0.0 1. 00 40.0 1. 00 40.0 D 6 **** 0.22 0.50 41.3 1.0 0.0 1. 00 42.3 1. 00 42.3 D 7 0.31 0.47 33.2 0.3 0.0 1. 00 33.5 1. 00 33.5 C 8 0.31 0.47 33.2 0.3 0.0 1. 00 33.5 1. 00 33.5 C 8 Trallix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:02:502007 Page 3.10 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alterna\lve) Background AM Intersection #3: HomesteadlWolfe Signal=ProlecVRights=lncl ude Final Vol: 68 721 113-- Lanes: 01202 ~4t~~ Signal=Protect Signal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 7/17/2007 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: ~ Cycle Time (see): 120 ~ 123 0 75 -4 Loss Time (see): 0 J- 0 433--- 2 ----... Critical V/C: 0.500 ....- 451 0 r Avg Cril Del (seclveh): 31.6 1= 0 194 Avg Delay (seelveh): 32.2 199'" LOS: C ..) ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Vol: 242 858'" 256 Signal=ProlecVRights=lnclude . Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << AM Peak Base Vol: 239 854 252 113 715 68 123 433 188 193 451 75 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 239 854 252 113 715 68 123 433 188 193 451 75 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Tr: 3 4 4 0 6 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 Initial Fut: 242 858 256 113 721 68 123 433 194 199 451 75 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 242 858 256 113 721 68 123 433 194 199 451 75 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 242 858 256 113 721 68 123 433 194 199 451 75 PCE Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 242 858 256 113 721 68 123 433 194 199 451 75 ------------1---------------11---------------11--------------,-11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.93 0.93 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.74 0.26 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.71 0.29 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1615 3502 4678 441 1805 3610 1615 1805 3030 504 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.24 0.16 0.03 0.15 0.15 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.48 Volume/Cap: 0.41 0.50 Uniform Del: 44.7 21.7 IncremntDe1: 0.5 0.2 InitQueuDe1: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 De1ay/Veh: 45.2 21.9 User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 45.2 21.9 LOS by Move: D C HCM2kAvgQ: 4 11 0.48 0.33 19.6 0.3 0.0 1. 00 19.9 1. 00 19.9 B 6 0.06 0.50 54.3 1.7 0.0 1. 00 56.0 1. 00 56.0 E 3 **** 0.37 0.41 27.9 0.1 0.0 1. 00 28.1 1. 00 28.1 C 8 0.37 0.41 27.9 0.1 0.0 1. 00 28.1 1. 00 28.1 C 8 0.14 0.47 47.1 1.3 0.0 1. 00 48.5 1. 00 48.5 D 5 0.24 0.50 39.4 0.5 0.0 1. 00 39.9 1. 00 39.9 D 8 **** 0.24 0.50 39.4 1.0 0.0 1. 00 40.4 1. 00 40.4 D 7 **** 0.22 0.50 41.0 1.0 0.0 1. 00 42.0 1. 00 42.0 D 7 0.32 0.47 33.0 0.3 0.0 1. 00 33.3 1. 00 33.3 C 8 0.32 0.47 33.0 0.3 0.0 1. 00 33.3 1. 00 33.3 C 8 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 0512:02:50 2007 Page 3-11 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Project AM Intersection #3: HomesteadlWolfe Signal =ProtecVRighls=lnclude Final Vol: 66 726 113m Lanes: 01202 ..-J4.~~ Signal=Protecl Signal=Prolect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: 7/1712007 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J. Cycle Time (sec): 120 ~ 126 0 75 -t Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 435." 2 -. Critical VlC: 0.504 ..- 451 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 31.8 r 0 194 Avg Delay (seclveh): 32.4 204." LOS: C ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Vol: 242 860." 256 Signal=ProlecVRights=lnclude Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11------------------------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ____________1 _______________11_______________11_______________11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << AM Peak Base Vol: 242 858 256 113 721 68 123 433 194 199 451 75 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 242 858 256 113 721 68 123 433 194 199 451 75 Added Vol: 0 2 2 0 5 0 5 2 0 5 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 242 860 258 113 726 68 128 435 194 204 451 75 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 242 860 258 113 726 68 128 435 194 204 451 75 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 242 860 258 113 726 68 128 435 194 204 451 75 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj.: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 242 860 258 113 726 68 128 435 194 204 451 75 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.93 0.93 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.74 0.26 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.71 0.29 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 .1615 3502 4681 438 1805 3610 1615 1805 3030 504 ------------I---------------II--~------------II---------------II--_____________1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.24 0.16 0.03 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.47 Volume/Cap: 0.42 0.50 Uniform Del: 44.9 21.9 IncremntDel: 0.5 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 45.4 22.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 45.4 22.1 LOS by Move: D C HCM2kAvgQ: 4 11 0.47 0.34 19.9 0.3 0.0 1. 00 20.1 1. 00 20.1 C 6 0.06 0.50 54.3 1.8 0.0 1. 00 56.1 1. 00 56.1 E 3 **** 0.37 0.42 28.1 0.1 0.0 1. 00 28.2 1. 00 28.2 C 8 0.37 0.42 28.1 0.1 0.0 1. 00 28.2 1. 00 28.2 C 8 0.15 0.47 46.7 1.3 0.0 1. 00 48.0 1. 00 48.0 D 5 0.24 0.50 39.5 0.5 0.0 1. 00 40.0 1. 00 40.0 D 8 **** 0.24 0.50 39.5 1.0 0.0 1. 00 40.5 1. 00 40.5 D 7 **** 0.22 0.50 40.7 1.0 0.0 1. 00 41. 7 1. 00 41.7 D 7 0.31 0.47 33.2 0.3 0.0 1. 00 33.5 1. 00 33.5 C 8 0.31 0.47 33.2 0.3 0.0 1. 00 33.5 1. 00 33.5 C 8 Traff<x7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Frr Del 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3-12 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Fulure Volume Alternative) Fulure Growth AM Intersection #3: HomesteadlWolfe Signal =ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Voi: 70 752 11 r" Lanes: 01202 ~4~~~ Srgnal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: nla Righls=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (see): 120 ~ 132 0 78 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 .t- O 451'" 2 -. Critical V/C: 0.522 +- 467 0 r Avg Cril Del (seclveh): 32.1 r 0 201 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 32.6 211'" LOS: C ~ ~ t ~ r+ Lanes: 2 0.2 0 Final Vol: 251 891'" 267 Slgnal=ProtecVRighls=lnclude Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Hovemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Hin. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Volume Hodule: Base Vol: 251 891 267 117 752 70 132 451 201 211 467 78 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 251 891 267 117 752 70 132 451 201 211 467 78 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 251 891 267 117 752 70 132 451 201 211 467 78 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 251 891 267 117 752 70 132 451 201 211 467 78 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 251 891 267 117 752 70 132 451 201 211 467 78 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 HLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 251 891 267 117 752 70 132 451 201 211 467 78 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Hodule: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.93 0.93 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.74 0.26 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.71 0.29 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1615 3502 4684 436 1805 3610 1615 1805 3028 506 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Hodule: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.25 0.17 0.03 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.15 Crit Haves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.17 0.47 Volume/Cap: 0.43 0.52 Uniform Del: 45.0 22.1 IncremntDe1: 0.5 0.3 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 45.5 22.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 45.5 22.4 LOS by Move: D C HCM2kAvgQ: 5 12 0.47 0.35 20.0 0.3 0.0 1. 00 20.3 1. 00 20.3 C 6 **** 0.06 0.52 54.4 2.2 0.0 1. 00 56.6 1. 00 56.6 E 3 0.37 0.43 28.3 0.2 0.0 1. 00 28.4 1. 00 28.4 C 8 0.37 0.43 28.3 0.2 0.0 1. 00 28.4 1. 00 28.4 C 8 0.15 0.49 46.9 1.4 0.0 1. 00 48.3 1. 00 48.3 D 5 0.24 0.52 39.7 0.6 0.0 1. 00 40.3 1. 00 40.3 D 8 **** 0.24 0.52 39.7 1.3 0.0 1. 00 40.9 1. 00 40.9 D 7 **** 0.22 0.52 40.9 1.2 0.0 1. 00 42.2 1. 00 42.2 D 7 0.31 0.49 33.4 0.3 0.0 1. 00 33.7 1. 00 33.7 C 9 0.31 0.49 33.4 0.3 0.0 1. 00 33.7 1. 00 33.7 C 9 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed 10 Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:02:502007 Page 3-13 Intersection #4: Wolfe/Pruneridge Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing AM Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 12 1094 64-- Lanes: 01201 ~4.~~ Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: 7/17/2007 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (sec): 120 ~ 44 81 -.\. Loss Time (sec): J- 0 0 31'" 0 -.. Critical VlC: 0.528 +- 21 T Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 17.7 1= 0 90 0 -. Avg Delay (sec/veh): 16.4 2 164'" LOS: B ~ +t t ~ r+ Street Name: Wol fe Road Pruneridge Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I-uu---------- j 1_________u____II______uuu___II__u___________1 volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << AM Peak Base Vol: 90 1349 385 64 1094 12 44 31 90 164 21 81 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 90 1349 385 64 1094 12 44 31 90 164 21 81 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 90 1349 385 64 1094 12 44 31 90 164 21 81 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 90 1349 0 64 1094 12 44 31 90 164 21 81 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 90 1349 0 64 1094 12 44 31 90 164 21 81 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 90 1349 0 64 1094 12 44 31 90 164 21 81 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.92 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.97 0.03 1.00 0.26 0.74 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1900 1805 5120 56 1805 432 1255 3502 1900 1615 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.37 0.00 0.04 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.01 0.05 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.08 0.71 Volume/Cap: 0.31 0.53 Uniform Del: 51.8 8.2 IncrernntDel: 0.6 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 52.4 8.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 52.4 8.4 LOS by Move: D A HCM2kAvgQ: 2 12 Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Vol: 90 1349'" 0 Signal=ProtecllRlghts=lgnore **** 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.07 0.53 54.1 4.3 0.0 1. 00 58.4 1. 00 58.4 E 3 0.69 0.31 7.2 0.0 0.0 1. 00 7.3 1. 00 7.3 A 6 0.69 0.31 7.2 0.0 0.0 1. 00 7.3 1. 00 7.3 A 6 0.07 0.33 52.8 1.5 0.0 1. 00 54.3 1. 00 54.3 D 2 0.14 0.53 48.3 2.3 0.0 1. 00 50.6 1. 00 50.6 D 5 **** 0.14 0.53 48.3 2.3 0.0 1. 00 50.6 1. 00 50.6 D 5 **** 0.09 0.53 52.3 1.7 0.0 1. 00 54.0 1. 00 54.0 D 4 0.15 0.07 43.7 0.1 0.0 1. 00 43.8 1. 00 43.8 D 1 0.15 0.33 45.5 0.8 0.0 1. 00 46.3 1. 00 46.3 D 3 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3-14 Level Of SE!lVice Computalion Report 2000 HeM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background AM Intersection #4: WolfefPruneridge Signal=ProtecVRighls=Jnelude Final Vol: 12 1112 64'" Lanes: 01201 .-J4t~'+ Signal =Proteel Signal=Prolect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnelude Vol Cnt Date: 7/17/2007 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (see): 120 -+- 44 81 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 0 31'- 0 -.... Critical VlC: 0.545 ..- 21 r AV9 Crit Del (seclveh): 19.0 r 0 105 0 AV9 Delay (seclveh): 17.6 2 180'" LOS: B ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Vol: 100 1361'" 0 Signal =ProlecVRights=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road pruneridge Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1--------------- [ 1---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------1 [---------------1 volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << AM Peak Base Vol: 90 1349 385 64 1094 12 44 31 90 164 21 81 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 90 1349 385 64 1094 12 44 31 90 164 21 81 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Tr: 10 12 73 0 18 0 0 0 15 16 0 0 Initial Fut: 100 1361 458 64 1112 12 44 31 105 180 21 81 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 100 1361 0 64 1112 12 44 31 105 180 21 81 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 100 1361 0 64 1112 12 44 31 105 180 21 81 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 100 1361 0 64 1112 12 44 31 105 180 21 81 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.88 0.88 0.92 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.97 0.03 1.00 0.23 0.77 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1900 1805 5121 55 1805 383 1297 3502 1900 1615 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.38 0.00 0.04 0.22 0.22 0.02 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.01 0.05 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.69 Volume/Cap: 0.32 0.54 Uniform Del: 51.4 9.1 IncremntDel: 0.6 0.3 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 52.0 9.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 52.0 9.4 LOS by Move: D A HCM2kAvgQ: 2 13 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.07 0.54 54.4 5.2 0.0 1. 00 59.6 1. 00 59.6 E 3 0.67 0.32 8.4 0.1 0.0 1. 00 8.4 1. 00 8.4 A 6 0.67 0.32 8.4 0.1 0.0 1. 00 8.4 1. 00 8.4 A 6 0.08 0.31 52.1 1.2 0.0 1. 00 53.3 1. 00 53.3 D 2 0.15 0.54 47.3 2.5 0.0 1. 00 49.8 1. 00 49.8 D 5 **** 0.15 0.54 47.3 2.5 0.0 1. 00 49.8 1. 00 49.8 D 5 **** 0.09 0.54 51.9 1.9 0.0 1. 00 53.8 1. 00 53.8, D 4 0.16 0.07 42.5 0.1 0.0 1. 00 42.5 1. 00 42.5 D 1 0.16 0.31 44.2 0.7 0.0 1. 00 44.9 1. 00 44.9 D 3 TrafflX 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oel 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3.15 Level or Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Allernalive) Project AM Intersection #4: Wolfe/Pruneridge Signal=ProlecVRighls=lnclude Final Vol: 12 1112 64'" Lanes: 0 1 2 0 1 ..,J4.~~ Signal=Protect Signal=Proleel Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: 7/17/2007 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: ~ Cycle Time (sec): 120 ~ 47 81 ~ Loss Time (sec): 0 .t- O 0 34-' 0 ---... Critical vie: 0.552 +- 26 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 19.6 1= 0 114 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 18.4 2 180'" LOS: B ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Vol: 114 1361'" 0 Signal=ProtecVRighls=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road Pruneridge Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << AM Peak Base Vol: 100 1361 458 64 1112 12 44 31 105 180 21 81 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 100 1361 458 64 1112 12 44 31 105 180 21 81 Added Vol: 14 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 9 0 5 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 114 1361 458 64 1112 12 47 34 114 180 26 81 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 114 1361 0 64 1112 12 47 34 114 180 26 81 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 114 1361 0 64 1112 12 47 34 114 180 26 81 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 114 1361 0 64 1112 12 47 34 114 180 26 81 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.92 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.97 0.03 1.00 0.23 0.77 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1900 1805 5121 55 1805 386 1295 3502 1900 1615 ------------1---------------] 1---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.38 0.00 0.04 0.22 0.22 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.05 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.10 0.68 Volume/Cap: 0.33 0.55 Uniform Del: 50.5 9.7 IncrernntDel: 0.6 0.3 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 51.1 9.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 51.1 9.9 LOS by Move: D A HCM2kAvgQ: 2 13 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.06 0.55 54.5 5.6 0.0 1. 00 60.1 1. 00 60.1 E 3 **** 0.65 0.33 9.4 0.1 0.0 1. 00 9.5 1. 00 9.5 A 7 0.65 0.33 9.4 0.1 0.0 1. 00 9.5 1. 00 9.5 A 7 0.09 0.30 51.4 1.1 0.0 1. 00 52.5 1. 00 52.5 D 2 0.16 0.55 46.5 2.5 0.0 1. 00 49.0 1. 00 49.0 D 6 **** 0.16 0.55 46.5 2.5 0.0 1. 00 49.0 1. 00 49.0 D 6 **** 0.09 0.55 52.0 2.0 0.0 1. 00 54.1 1. 00 54.1 D 4 0.17 0.08 42.3 0.1 0.0 1. 00 42.4 1. 00 42.4 D 1 0.17 0.30 43.9 0.6 0.0 1. 00 44.5 1. 00 44.5 D 3 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed 10 Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE F ri Ocl 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3-16 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Future Growth AM Intersection #4: Wolfe/Pruneridge Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 12 1151 66'" Lanes: 0 1 2 0 1 ~4.~'+ Signal=Protect Signal =Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: nla Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: .J- Cycie Time {sec}: 120 ~ 49 B4 ~ Loss Time (sec): 0 J- 0 0 35'" 0 -... Critical V/C: 0.571 +- 27 r Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 19.9 ~ 0 117 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 16.6 2 166'" LOS: B ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Vol: 117 1410'" 0 Signal =ProlecVRighls=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road pruneridge Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------1 [---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 volume Module: Base Vol: 117 1410 472 66 1151 12 49 35 117 186 27 84 Growth Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 117 1410 472 66 1151 12 49 35 117 186 27 84 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ini tial Fut: 117 1410 472 66 1151 12 49 35 117 186 27 84 User Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Volume: 117 1410 0 66 1151 12 49 35 117 186 27 84 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 117 1410 0 66 1151 12 49 35 117 186 27 84 PCE Adj : 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Final Vol. : 117 1410 0 66 1151 12 49 35 117 186 27 84 ------------1---------------11---------------1 [---------------1 [---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 1. 00 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.92 1. 00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1. 00 1. 00 2.97 0.03 1. 00 0.23 0.77 2.00 1. 00 1. 00 Final Sat. : 3502 3610 1900 1805 5128 53 1805 387 1294 3502 1900 1615 ------------1---------------1 [---------------11--------------- [ 1---------------] Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.39 0.00 0.04 0.22 0.22 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.10 0.68 0.00 0.06 0.65 0.65 0.09 0.16 0.16 0.09 0.17 0.17 Volume/Cap: 0.34 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.34 0.34 0.31 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.09 0.31 Uniform Del: 50.6 9.8 0.0 54.6 9.4 9.4 51. 5 46.7 46.7 52.1 42.4 44.1 IncremntDel: 0.6 0.3 0.0 6.7 0.1 0.1 1.2 2.9 2.9 2.4 0.1 0.7 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Delay/Veh: 51.2 10.1 0.0 61. 2 9.5 9.5 52.7 49.7 49.7 54.5 42.5 44.8 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 51.2 10.1 0.0 61. 2 9.5 9.5 52.7 49.7 49.7 54.5 42.5 44.8 LOS by Move: D B A E A A D D D D D D HCM2kAvgQ: 2 14 0 3 7 7 2 6 6 4 1 3 Traffix 7.6.0915 Copyright (cl 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed 10 Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Del 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3-17 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume A1temalive) Existing AM Intersection #5: Wolfe/l-280 NB Ramp Signal =ProlecURlghts=lgnore Final Vol: 0 629 0'" Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 ~4.~~ Signal=Proleel Signal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 10/312006 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (see): 60 ~ 0 0 720'" ~ Loss Time (sec): 0 J- 0 0 0 0 -. Critical VlC: 0.624 .- 1! 0 0 r AV9 Crit Del (seclveh): 11.4 1= 0 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 10.1 383 LOS: B ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 00200 Final Vol: 0 1320'" 0 Signal=ProtecURights=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << AM Peak Base Vol: 0 1320 0 0 629 0 0 0 0 383 0 720 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1320 0 0 629 0 0 0 0 383 0 720 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1320 0 0 629 0 0 0 0 383 0 720 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1320 0 0 629 0 0 0 0 383 0 720 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1320 0 0 629 0 0 0 0 383 0 720 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 1320 0 0 629 0 0 0 0 383 0 720 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.89 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.00 1.65 Final Sat.: 0 3610 0 0 3610 0 0 0 0 2270 0 2784 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.26 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.59 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.62 Uniform Del: 0.0 8.1 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.6 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 8.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 8.7 LOS by Move: A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 9 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.59 0.30 6.2 0.1 0.0 1. 00 6.3 1. 00 6.3 A 3 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.41 0.41 12.4 0.1 0.0 1. 00 12.5 1. 00 12.5 B 4 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.41 0.62 13.9 0.7 0.0 1. 00 14.6 1. 00 14.6 B 7 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Del 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3.18 Levei Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background AM Intersection #5: Wolfell.280 NB Ramp Slgnal=ProtecVRights=lgnore Final Vol: 0 678 0'" Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 ...-J4.~~ Slgnal=Protect Signal=Prolect Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 10/312006 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: ~ Cycle Time (see): 60 ~ 0 0 720'" ~ Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 --+- Critical V/C: 0.638 ...- 11 0 0 r Avg Grit Del (seclveh): 11.6 r 0 0 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 10.2 444 LOS: B ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 00 2 00 Final Vol: 0 1352'" 0 Signal =ProtecVRights=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road 1-280 NB Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------1 ) ---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------.------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << AM Peak Base Vol: 0 1320 0 0 629 0 0 0 0 383 0 720 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1320 0 0 629 0 0 0 0 383 0 720 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Tr: 0 32 0 0 49 0 0 0 0 61 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1352 0 0 678 0 0 0 0 444 0 720 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1352 0 0 678 0 0 0 0 444 0 720 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1352 0 0 678 0 0 0 0 444 0 720 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 0 1352 0 0 678 0 0 0 0 444 0 720 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.89 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.38 0.00 1.62 Final Sat.: 0 3610 0 0 3610 0 0 0 0 2335 0 2736 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.26 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.59 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.64 Uniform Del: 0.0 8.2 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.7 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 8.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 8.8 LOS by Move: A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 10 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.59 0.32 6.3 0.1 0.0 1. 00 6.4 1. 00 6.4 A 3 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.41 0.46 12.8 0.1 0.0 1. DO 12.9 1. DO 12.9 B 5 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.41 0.64 14.0 0.8 0.0 1. 00 14.8 1. 00 14.8 B 8 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates. Ino. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE F ri Oct 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3-19 Level Of ServIce Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Project AM Intersection #5: Wolfell-280 NB Ramp Signal=ProtecVRights=lgnore Final Vol: 0 685 0'" Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 ~4.~~ Signal=Protect Signal =Prolecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: 10/312006 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle Time (see): 60 ~ 0 0 723'" ~ Loss Time (see): 0 J- 0 0 0 0 --. Critical V/C: 0.641 ...- 1! 0 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclvehl: 11.6 1= 0 0 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 10.2 444 LOS: B ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 00200 Final Vol: 0 1362'" 0 Signal =ProlecVRighls=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road 1-280 NB Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << AM Peak Base Vol: 0 1352 0 0 678 0 0 0 0 444 0 720 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1352 0 0 678 0 0 0 0 444 0 720 Added Vol: 0 10 0 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1362 0 0 685 2 0 0 0 444 0 723 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1362 0 0 685 0 0 0 0 444 0 723 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1362 0 0 685 0 0 0 0 444 0 723 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 1362 0 0 685 0 0 0 0 444 0 723 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.89 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.38 0.00 1.62 Final Sat.: 0 3610 0 0 3610 0 0 0 0 2334 0 2738 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.26 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.59 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.64 Uniform Del: 0.0 8.2 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.7 InitQueuDe1: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 De1ay/Veh: 0.0 8.8 User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 8.8 LOS by Move: A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 10 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.59 0.32 6.3 0.1 0.0 1. 00 6.4 1. 00 6.4 A 4 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.41 0.46 12.8 0.1 0.0 1. 00 13.0 1. 00 13.0 B 5 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.41 0.64 14.1 0.8 0.0 1. 00 14.9 1. 00 14.9 B 8 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (cl 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 0512:02:50 2007 Page 3.20 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Future Growth AM Intersection #5: Wolfe/l-280 NB Ramp Signal=ProleeVRights=lgnore Final Vol: 0 70B 0-' Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 ~4~~~ Signal=Protect Signal =Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnl Date: nfa Righls=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: ~ Cycle Time (see): 60 ~ 0 0 749'" ~ Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 -... Critical VIC: 0.664 ...- 1! 0 0 r Avg Crit Del (seelveh): 12.0 T 0 0 0 Avg Delay (seelveh): 10.5 45B LOS: B ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 Final Vol: 0 1410'" 0 Slgnal=ProtecVRights=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road 1-280 NB Ramp Approach: North Bound Sout.h Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1410 265 0 708 594 0 0 0 458 0 749 Growth Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 0 1410 265 0 708 594 0 0 0 458 0 749 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Init.ial Fut: 0 1410 265 0 708 594 0 0 0 458 0 749 User Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Volume: 0 1410 0 0 708 0 0 0 0 458 0 749 Reduct. Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1410 0 0 708 0 0 0 0 458 0 749 PCE Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Final Vol. : 0 1410 0 0 708 0 0 0 0 458 0 749 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturat.ion Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1. 00 0.95 0.95 1. 00 0.95 0.95 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 0.89 1. 00 0.89 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 38 0.00 1. 62 Final Sat.. : 0 3610 0 0 3610 0 0 0 0 2332 0 2740 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.27 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.41 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.66 Uniform Del: 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.9 0.0 14.3 Incrernnt.De1: 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.9 Init.QueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 .1 0.0 15.2 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13 .1 0.0 15.2 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A B A B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 10 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 8 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Ocl 05 12:02:502007 Page 3-21 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing AM Intersection #6: Wolfell-280 SB Ramp Signal =ProtecVRights=lgnore Final Vol: 0 731 0- Lanes: 0 0 3 0 0 ..v4ti+~ Signal=Prolect Signal=Prolect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 10/3/2006 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: .-f Cycle Time (see): 60 ~ 561." 2 0 0 -.t Loss Time (see): 0 J- 0 0 0 0 --+ Critical VlC: 0.428 -+- 0 0 0 T Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 8.9 1= 0 154 2 . Avg Delay (seclveh): 7.9 0 0 LOS: A ~ ~ t ~ r+ Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 Final Vol: 0 965... 0 Signal=ProtecVRighls=lgnore Wolfe Road 1-280 SB Ramp North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << AM Peak Base Vol: 0 965 0 0 731 0 561 0 154 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 965 0 0 731 0 561 0 154 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 965 0 0 731 0 561 0 154 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 965 0 0 731 0 561 0 154 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 965 0 0 731 0 561 0 154 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 965 0 0 731 0 561 0 154 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 0 0 5187 0 3502 0 2842 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.63 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.43 Uniform Del: 0.0 5.7 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 De1ay/Veh: 0.0 5.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 5.9 LOS by Move: A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 Street Name: Approach: Movement: 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.63 0.23 4.9 0.0 0.0 1. 00 4.9 1. 00 4.9 A 2 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.37 0.43 14.0 0.2 0.0 1. 00 14.2 1. 00 14.2 B 4 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.37 0.14 12.4 0.1 0.0 1. 00 12.5 1. 00 12.5 B 1 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (cl 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3-22 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background AM Intersection #6: Wolfe/l-280 SB Ramp Signal=ProtecURighls=lgnore Final Vol: 0 1121 0'" Lanes: 00 3 00 ~4+'}'~ Signal =Prolect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 10/312006 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J. Cycle Time (sec): 60 ~ 561--- 2 0 0 ~ Loss Time (sec): ~ 0 0 0 0 --.... Critical VIC: 0.462 -+- 0 0 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh); 8.8 1= 0 210 2 Avg Delay (seclveh): 7.6 0 LOS: A ~ ~ t ~ r+ Lanes: 00 2 00 Final Vol: 0 108So.. 0 Signal=ProlecURights=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road 1-280 SB Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << AM Peak Base Vol: 0 965 0 0 731 0 561 0 154 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 965 0 0 731 0 561 0 154 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Tr: 0 124 0 0 390 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1089 0 0 1121 0 561 0 210 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj; 1.001.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1089 0 0 1121 0 561 0 210 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1089 0 0 1121 0 561 0 210 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 1089 0 0 1121 0 561 0 210 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 0 0 5187 0 3502 0 2842 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.65 Volume/Cap; 0.00 0.46 Uniform Del: 0.0 5.2 IncrernntDel: 0.0 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj; 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 5.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 5.3 LOS by Move: A A HCM2kAvgQ; 0 6 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.65 0.33 4.6 0.1 0.0 1. 00 4.7 1. 00 4.7 A 4 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.35 0.46 15.2 0.3 0.0 1. 00 15.5 1. 00 15.5 B 5 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.35 0.21 13.8 0.1 0.0 1. 00 13 .9 1. 00 13 .9 B 2 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3-23 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Project AM Intersection #6: Wolfe/l-280 5B Ramp Signal=ProtecVRights=lgnore Final Vol: 0 1125 0'" Lanes: 00 3 00 ~4~~~ Signal=Prolect Signal=Prolect Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnctude Vol Cnt Date: 1013/2006 Righls=Jnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycie Time (sec): 60 ~ 564'" 2 0 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ---III-- Critical V/C: 0.465 ..- 0 0 0 r Avg Crit Del (seelveh): 8.8 T 0 210 2 Avg Delay (seclveh): 7.6 0 0 LOS: A ~ ~ t ~ r+- Lanes: 00 2 00 Final Vol: 0 1096m 0 Signal=ProlectlRlghts=lgnore Wolfe Road 1-280 SB Ramp North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I---------------! 1---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << AM Peak Base Vol: 0 1089 0 0 1121 0 561 0 210 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1089 0 0 1121 0 561 0 210 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 7 0 0 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1096 0 0 1125 2 564 0 210 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1096 0 0 1125 0 564 0 210 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1096 0 0 1125 0 564 0 210 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 1096 0 0 1125 0 564 0 210 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.92 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 0 0 5187 0 3502 0 2842 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.65 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.46 Uniform Del: 0.0 5.2 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 5.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 5.3 LOS by Move: A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 6 Street Name: Approach: Movement: 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.65 0.33 4.6 0.1 0.0 1. 00 4.7 1. 00 4.7 A 4 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.35 0.46 15.3 0.3 0.0 1. 00 15.5 1. 00 15.5 B 5 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.35 0.21 13.8 0.1 0.0 1. 00 13.9 1. 00 13.9 B 2 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed 10 Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:02:502007 Page 3-24 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Future Growth AM Intersection #6: Wolfell-280 SB Ramp Signal=ProteCVRights=lgnore Final Vol: 0 1151 0'" Lanes: 0 0 3 0 0 ..,J4~~'+ Signal=Prolecl Signal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: nfa Righls=lnctude Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (see): 60 ~ 584'" 2 0 0 -t Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 --JIIo- Critical VlC: 0.480 .- 0 0 0 =r Avg Crjt Del (seciveh): 8.9 r 0 216 2 Avg Delay (seciveh): 7.7 0 0 LOS: A ~ +t t ~ ~ Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 Final Vol: 0 , 131'" 0 Signal=ProlecVRights=tgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 SB Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11 --------------- 1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ____________1_______________11_______________11_______________11 _______________1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1131 333 0 1151 257 584 0 216 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 0 1131 333 0 1151 257 584 0 216 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1131 333 0 1151 257 584 0 216 0 0 0 User Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Volume: 0 1131 0 0 1151 0 584 0 216 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1131 0 0 1151 0 584 0 216 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Final Vol. : 0 1131 0 0 1151 0 584 0 216 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1. 00 0.95 0.95 1. 00 0.91 0.91 0.92 1. 00 0.75 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat. : 0 3610 0 0 5187 0 3502 0 2842 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 15.3 0.0 13 .8 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1. 00 O~OO 0.00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 15.6 0.0 13 .9 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 4.7 0.0 15.6 0.0 13 .9 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A A A A B A B A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 6 0 0 4 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 Tralfix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3-25 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing AM Intersection #7: Wolfe/Stevens Creek Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 3BO'" 264 196 Lanes: 10 2 01 ~4.~~ Signal=Protect Signal =Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 10/3/2006 Righls=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (sec): 120 ~ 303'" 2 0 204 ~ Loss Time (sec): 0 J- 0 477 3 --... Critical VlC: 0.64B ...- 2 840'" 0 =r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 39.7 1= 0 113 Avg Delay (seclveh): 35.4 2 62 LOS: D ~ ~ t t-- r+ Lanes: 0 2 0 Final Vol: 214'" 702 125 Signal=ProtecVRighls=lnclude Street Name: Wolfe Road Stevens creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << AM Peak Base Vol: 214 702 125 196 264 380 303 477 113 62 840 204 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 214 702 125 196 264 380 303 477 113 62 840 204 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 214 702 125 196 264 380 303 477 113 62 840 204 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 214 702 125 196 264 380 303 477 113 62 840 204 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 214 702 125 196 264 380 303 477 113 62 840 204 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 214 702 125 196 264 380 303 477 113 62 840 204 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 1.00 2.55 0.45 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.41 0.59 Final Sat.: 1805 4302 766 1805 3610 1615 3502 5187 1615 3502 4052 984 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.11 0.07 0.24 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.02 0.21 0.21 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 Volume/Cap: 0.65 Uniform Del: 45.4 IncremntDel: 4.4 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 49.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 49.9 LOS by Move: D HCM2kAvgQ: 8 0.33 0.50 32.4 0.2 0.0 1. 00 32.6 1. 00 32.6 C 9 0.33 0.50 32.4 0.2 0.0 1. 00 32.6 1. 00 32.6 C 9 0.22 0.50 41.1 1.0 0.0 1. 00 42.1 1. 00 42.1 D 7 0.36 0.20 26.2 0.1 0.0 1. 00 26.3 1. 00 26.3 C 3 0.36 0.65 31. 8 2.5 0.0 1. 00 34.3 1. 00 34.3 C 12 **** **** 0.13 0.65 49.3 3.2 0.0 1. 00 52.5 1. 00 52.5 D 7 0.38 0.24 25.4 0.1 0.0 1.00 25.4 1. 00 25.4 C 4 0.38 0.18 24.8 0.1 0.0 1. 00 24.9 1. 00 24.9 C 3 0.07 0.24 52.5 0.5 0.0 1. 00 53.0 1. 00 53.0 D 1 0.32 0.65 35.0 0.9 0.0 1. 00 35.9 1. 00 35.9 D 13 **** 0.32 0.65 35.0 0.9 0.0 1. 00 35.9 1. 00 35.9 D 13 Traffix7.8.0915 Copyright (e) 2005 Dowling Associales. Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Ocl 0512:02:502007 Page 3.26 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background AM Intersection #7: Wolfe/Stevens Creek Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 432m 272 250 Lanes: 10201 ~4.~~. Signal=Protect Slgnal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 1 0/312006 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: .-f Cycle Time (see): 120 ~ 368". 2 0 251 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 .t- O , 504 3 ---JIIo- Critical V/C: 0.716 -+- 2 877". 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 42.1 1= 0 113 Avg Delay {seclveh): 37.6 2 77 LOS: 0 ~ ~ t t-- r+ Lanes: 1 0 2 0 Final Vol: 214". 714 125 Signal =ProlecVRighls=lnciude Street Name: Wolfe Road Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------] Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << AM Peak Base Vol: 214 702 125 196 264 380 303 477 113 62 840 204 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 214 702 125 196 264 380 303 477 113 62 840 204 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Tr: 0 12 0 54 8 52 65 27 0 15 37 47 Initial Fut: 214 714 125 250 272 432 368 504 113 77 877 251 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 214 714 125 250 272 432 368 504 113 77 877 251 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 214 714 125 250 272 432 368 504 113 77 877 251 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 214 714 125 250 272 432 368 504 113 77 877 251 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 1.00 2.55 0.45 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.33 0.67 Final Sat.: 1805 4317 756 1805 3610 1615 3502 5187 1615 3502 3900 1116 ------------[---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.17 0.17 0.14 0.08 0.27 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.02 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.17 Volume/Cap: 0.72 Uniform Del: 47.4 IncrernntDel: 8.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 55.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 55.4 LOS by Move: E HCM2kAvgQ: 9 0.29 0.56 35.9 0.5 0.0 1. 00 36.4 1. 00 36.4 D 10 0.29 0.56 35.9 0.5 0.0 1. 00 36.4 1. 00 36.4 D 10 0.25 0.56 39.6 1.7 0.0 1. 00 41. 3 1. 00 41.3 D 9 0.37 0.72 32.1 4.1 0.0 1. 00 36.2 1. 00 36.2 D 15 **** **** 0.15 0.72 48.8 4.8 0.0 1. 00 53.6 1. 00 53.6 D 8 0.38 0.26 25.9 0.1 0.0 1. 00 26.0 1. 00 26.0 C 5 0.38 0.19 25.1 0.1 0.0 1. 00 25.3 1. 00 25.3 C 3 0.09 0.26 51. 4 0.5 0.0 1. 00 51. 8 1. 00 51. 8 D 2 0.31 0.72 36.4 1.6 0.0 1. 00 38.0 1. 00 38.0 D 14 **** 0.31 0.72 36.4 1.6 0.0 1. 00 38.0 1. 00 38.0 D 14 Traff!x 7.8.0915 0.37 0.20 25.5 0.1 0.0 1. 00 25.5 1. 00 25.5 C 3 Copyrighl (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Ocl 0512:02:50 2007 Page 3.27 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HeM Operations (Future Volume Allernalive) Project AM Intersection #7: Wolfe/Stevens Creek Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 434'" 272 252 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 ~4.'}'~ Signal=Protect Signal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 101312006 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle Time (see): 120 ~ 371'" 2 0 254 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 .t- O 504 3 -.. Critical vIe: 0.719 ..- 2 877'" 0 -:( Avg Crit Oel (seclveh): 42.2 T 0 113 Avg Delay (seclveh): 37.7 2 77 LOS: D ~~t~~ Lanes: 2 0 Final Vol: 214'" 714 125 Signal=ProtecVRighls=lnclude Wolfe Road Stevens Creek Boulevard North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11--------------- 11_______________11_______________1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << AM Peak Base Vol: 214 714 125 250 272 432 368 504 113 77 877 251 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 214 714 125 250 272 432 368 504 113 77 877 251 Added Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 3 PasserByVo1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 214 714 125 252 272 434 371 504 113 77 877 254 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 214 714 125 252 272 434 371 504 113 77 877 254 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 214 714 125 252 272 434 371 504 113 77 877 254 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 214 714 125 252 272 434 371 504 113 77 877 254 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 1.00 2.55 0.45 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.33 0.67 Final Sat.: 1805 4317 756 1805 3610 1615 3502 5187 1615 3502 3885 1125 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.17 0.17 0.14 0.08 0.27 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.02 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.16 Volume/Cap: 0.72 Uniform Del: 47.5 IncremntDel: 8.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 55.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 55.7 LOS by Move: E HCM2kAvgQ: 9 Street Name: Approach: Movement: 0.29 0.57 36.0 0.5 0.0 1. 00 36.5 1. 00 36.5 D 10 0.29 0.57 36.0 0.5 0.0 1. 00 36.5 1. 00 36.5 D 10 0.25 0.57 39.6 1.7 0.0 1. 00 41.3 1. 00 41.3 D 9 0.37 0.72 32.2 4.2 0.0 1. 00 36.4 1. 00 36.4 D 15 **** **** 0.15 0.72 48.8 4.9 0.0 1. 00 53.7 1. 00 53.7 D 8 0.38 0.26 25.9 0.1 0.0 1. 00 25.9 1. 00 25.9 C 5 0.38 0.19 25.1 0.1 0.0 1. 00 25.3 1. 00 25.3 C 3 0.09 0.26 51.3 0.5 0.0 1. 00 51. 8 1. 00 51. 8 D 2 0.31 0.72 36.5 1.6 0.0 1. 00 38.1 1. 00 38.1 D 15 **** 0.31 0,72 36.5 1.6 0.0 1. 00 38.1 1. 00 38.1 D 15 Traffix 7.8.0915 0.37 0.20 25.4 0.1 0.0 1. 00 25.5 1. 00 25.5 C 3 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fr; Oct 05 12:02:50 2007 Page 3-28 Level or Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Future Growth AM Intersection #7: Wolfe/Stevens Creek Sjgnal~ProtecVRights~lnclude Final Vol: 448'" 282 259 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 ~4.~~ Signal~Protecl Signal ~Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights~lncl ude Vol Cnt Date: n/a Righls~lnclude lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (see): 120 ~ 382'" 2 0 261 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 1 521 3 -----.. Critical vie: 0.742 +- 2 907'" 0 =r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 43.1 1= 0 117 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 38.3 2 79 LOS: D ~ ~ t ~ r+ Lanes: 1 0 2 0 Final Vol: 222'" 739 130 Signal ~ProlecVRights~lnclude Street Name: Wolfe Road Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 222 739 130 259 282 448 382 521 117 79 907 261 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 222 739 130 259 282 448 382 521 117 79 907 261 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 222 739 130 259 282 448 382 521 117 79 907 261 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 222 739 130 259 282 448 382 521 117 79 907 261 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 222 739 130 259 282 448 382 521 117 79 907 261 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 222 739 130 259 282 448 382 521 117 79 907 261 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 1.00 2.55 0.45 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.33 0.67 Final Sat.: 1805 4314 759 1805 3610 1615 3502 5187 1615 3502 3895 1121 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.17 0.17 0.14 0.08 0.28 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.02 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.17 Volume/Cap: 0.74 Uniform Del: 47.6 IncremntDel: 9.6 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 57.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 57.2 LOS by Move: E HCM2kAvgQ: 9 0.29 0.58 36.1 0.6 0.0 1. 00 36.7 1. 00 36.7 D 10 0.29 0.58 36.1 0.6 0.0 1. 00 36.7 1. 00 36.7 D 10 0.25 0.58 39.8 2.0 0.0 1. 00 41.8 1. 00 41. 8 D 9 0.37 0.21 25.5 0.1 0.0 1. 00 25.6 1. 00 25.6 c 4 0.37 0.74 32.6 4.9 0.0 1. 00 37.5 1. 00 37.5 D 15 **** **** 0.15 0.74 49.0 5.8 0.0 1. 00 54.8 1. 00 54.8 D 9 0.38 0.27 26.0 0.1 0.0 1. 00 26.0 1. 00 26.0 c 5 0.38 0.19 25.2 0.2 0.0 1. 00 25.3 1. 00 25.3 C 3 0.08 0.27 51. 5 0.5 0.0 1. 00 51. 9 1. 00 51.9 D 2 0.31 0.74 36.8 1.9 0.0 1. 00 38.8 1. 00 38.8 D 15 **** 0.31 0.74 36.8 1.9 0.0 1. 00 38.8 1. 00 38.8 D 15 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyrighl (c) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans". San Jose COMPARE Fr; Oel 05 12:01 :43 2007 Page 3. 1 Level Of Serviee Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing PM Intersection #1: De Anza/Homestead Signal =ProteeVRights=lnelude Final Vol: 346 1971'" 372 Lanes: 0 1 2 0 2 ~4t~~ Signal=Prolecl Signal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnelude Vol Cnt Date: 1 0/3/2006 Righls=lnelude Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cyele Time (see): 140 ~ 163 2 150 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 J- 0 0 561 2 -+ Critical V/C: 0.921 -<lit-- 2 448 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 53.6 r 333". Avg Delay (see/veh): 45.8 323'.. LOS: D ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 Final Vol: 581". 1277 672 Signal=ProleeVRights=lnelude Street Name: De P~za Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << PM Peak Base Vol: 581 1277 672 372 1971 346 183 561 333 323 448 150 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 581 1277 672 372 1971 346 183 561 333 323 448 150 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 581 1277 672 372 1971 346 183 561 333 323 448 150 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 581 1277 672 372 1971 346 183 561 333 323 448 150 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 581 1277 672 372 1971 346 183 561 333 323 448 150 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 581 1277 672 372 1971 346 183 561 333 323 448 150 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.55 0.45 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 5187 1615 3502 4315 758 3502 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.25 0.42 0.11 0.46 0.46 0.05 0.16 0.21 0.09 0.12 0.09 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 Volume/Cap: 0.92 Uniform Del: 56.4 IncremntDel: 19.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 75.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 75.4 LOS by Move: E HCM2kAvgQ: 16 0.54 0.46 19.8 0.1 0.0 1. 00 19.9 1. 00 19.9 B 12 0.54 0.77 25.5 4.3 0.0 1. 00 29.9 1. 00 29.9 C 24 **** 0.14 0.77 58.3 7.6 0.0 1. 00 65.9 1. 00 65.9 E 10 0.50 0.92 32.7 6.2 0.0 1. 00 39.0 1. 00 39.0 D 37 0.10 0.54 60.4 1.8 0.0 1. 00 62.2 1. 00 62.2 E 5 0.22 0.69 49.9 2.6 0.0 1. 00 52.6 1. 00 52.6 D 13 0.22 0.92 53.1 28.3 0.0 1. 00 81. 4 1. 00 81.4 F 18 **** **** 0.10 0.92 62.4 28.9 0.0 1. 00 91.3 1. 00 91.3 F 10 0.23 0.54 47.6 0.8 0.0 1. 00 48.4 1. 00 48.4 D 9 0.23 0.41 46.0 0.7 0.0 1. 00 46.7 1. 00 46.7 D 6 Traffixl .8.0915 0.50 0.92 32.7 6.2 0.0 1. 00 39.0 1. 00 39.0 D 37 Copyright (e) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:01 :43 2007 Page 3. 2 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Allernatlve) Background PM Intersection #1: De Anza/Homestead Signal=ProlecVRlghts=lnclude Final Vol: 352 1993'" 373 Lanes: 0 1 2 0 2 ~4.~~ Signal =Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cn! Dale: 10/3/2006 Righ!s=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: ~ Cycle Time (see): 140 ~ 188 2 152 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 0 562 2 ----.. Crilical V/C: 0.946 +- 2 454 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 57.9 r 0 349'" Avg Delay (sec/veh): 47.9 2 325m LOS: D ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 Final Vol: 613'" 1312 680 Signal =ProtecVRights=lnclude Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ____________1_______________ 11_______________11_______________11_______________1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << PM Peak Base Vol: 581 1277 672 372 1971 346 183 561 333 323 448 150 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Ese: 581 1277 672 372 1971 346 183 561 333 323 448 150 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Tr: 32 35 8 1 22 6 5 1 16 2 6 2 Initial Fut: 613 1312 680 373 1993 352 188 562 349 325 454 152 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 613 1312 680 373 1993 352 188 562 349 325 454 152 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 613 1312 680 373 1993 352 188 562 349 325 454 152 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 613 1312 680 373 1993 352 188 562 349 325 454 152 ------------1---------------11---------------1 ] ---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.55 0.45 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 5187 1615 3502 4311 761 3502 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------ 1_______________11_______________11_______________ 11_______________1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.25 0.42 0.11 0.46 0.46 0.05 0.16 0.22 0.09 0.13 0.09 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.19 Volume/Cap: 0.95 Uniform Del: 56.4 IncremntDe1: 22.9 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 79.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 79.3 LOS by Move: E HCM2kAvgQ: 17 0.54 0.47 20.0 0.1 0.0 1. 00 20.2 1. 00 20.2 C 12 0.54 0.78 25.9 4.7 0.0 1. 00 30.6 1. 00 30.6 C 24 **** 0.14 0.78 58.5 8.3 0.0 1. 00 66.8 1. 00 66.8 E 10 0.49 0.95 34.1 8.6 0.0 1. 00 42.7 1. 00 42.7 D 40 0.49 0.95 34.1 8.6 0.0 1. 00 42.7 1. 00 42.7 D 40 0.10 0.55 60.2 1.9 0.0 1. 00 62.1 1. 00 62.1 E 5 0.23 0.68 49.4 2.3 0.0 1. 00 51.7 1. 00 51.7 D 12 0.23 0.95 53.2 33.1 0.0 1. 00 86.3 1. 00 86.3 F 19 **** **** 0.10 0.95 62.8 34.7 0.0 1. 00 97.4 1. 00 97.4 F 10 0.23 0.55 47.6 0.8 0.0 1. DO 48.4 1. DO 48.4 D 9 0.23 0.41 46.0 0.7 0.0 1. 00 46.7 1. 00 46.7 D 6 Trafflx 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Ocl 05 12:01 :432007 Page 3. 3 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Project PM Intersection #1: De Anza/Homestead Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 352 1993-' 377 Lanes: 01202 ~4.~~ Signal=Prolact Signal=Protact Final Vol: Lanas: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Data: 10/312006 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: ..J. Cycle Tlma (see): 140 ~ 188 2 156 --\. Loss Time (sac): 0 J.- 0 0 566 2 --+- Critical VIC: 0.947 -<IIf- 2 458 0 r Avg Cril Dal (saclvah): 58.2 T 0 349'" Avg Delay (saclvah): 48.2 .- 2 329'" LOS: D ~ ~ t 1+ ~ Lanas: 2 0 3 0 Final Vol: 613'" 1312 684 Signal=ProtectlRights=lncluda Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << PM Peak Base Vol: 613 1312 680 373 1993 352 188 562 349 325 454 152 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 613 1312 680 373 1993 352 188 562 349 325 454 152 Added Vol: 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 613 1312 684 377 1993 352 188 566 349 329 458 156 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 613 1312 684 377 1993 352 188 566 349 329 458 156 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 613 1312 684 377 1993 352 188 566 349 329 458 156 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 613 1312 684 377 1993 352 188 566 349 329 458 156 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.55 0.45 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 5187 1615 3502 4311 761 3502 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.25 0.42 0.11 0.46 0.46 0.05 0.16 0.22 0.09 0.13 0.10 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 Volume/Cap: 0.95 Uniform Del: 56.4 IncremntDel: 23.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 79.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 79.6 LOS by Move: E HCM2kAvgQ: 17 0.54 0.47 20.1 0.1 0.0 1. 00 20.3 1. 00 20.3 C 12 0.54 0.79 26.1 4.9 0.0 1. 00 31.0 1. 00 31.0 C 25 **** 0.14 0.79 58.5 8.6 0.0 1. 00 67.1 1. 00 67.1 E 10 0.49 0.95 34.1 8.8 0.0 1. 00 42.9 1. 00 42.9 D 40 0.49 0.95 34.1 8.8 0.0 1. 00 42.9 1. 00 42.9 D 40 0.10 0.55 60.3 1.9 0.0 1. 00 62.2 1. 00 62.2 E 5 0.23 0.69 49.5 2.5 0.0 1. 00 51. 9 1. 00 51. 9 D 13 **** 0.23 0.95 53.2 33.4 0.0 1. 00 86.6 1. 00 86.6 F 19 **** 0.10 0.95 62.7 34.7 0.0 1. 00 97.4 1. 00 97 .4 F 11 0.23 0.55 47.5 0.8 0.0 1. 00 48.3 1. 00 48.3 D 9 0.23 0.42 45.9 0.8 0.0 1. 00 46.7 1. 00 46.7 D 6 Trafflx 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associatas, Inc. Licensed lo Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Ocl 05 12:01 :43 2007 Page 3- 4 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternalive) Future Growth PM Intersection #1: De Anza/Homestead Signal=ProtecVRighls=include Final Vol: 364 2064'" 390 Lanes: 01 202 ~4+~~ Signal=Protect Signal=Prolect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cn! Date: nla Rights=include Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (sec): 140 -+-- 195 2 161 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 J-- 0 0 566 2 ----. Critical VIC: 0.961 +- 2 474 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 65.0 1= 0 361'" Avg Delay (seclveh): 52.0 2 341'" LOS: D ~ ~ t ~ r+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 Final Vol: 634'" 1 356 706 Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 634 1358 708 390 2064 364 195 586 361 341 474 161 Growth Adj: LOO LOO LOO LOO LOO LOO LOO LOO 1. 00 1. 00 LOO 1.00 Initial Bse: 634 1358 708 390 2064 364 195 586 361 341 474 161 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 634 1358 708 390 2064 364 195 586 361 341 474 161 User Adj: LOO 1. 00 LOO 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 LaO 1. 00 1. 00 LOO 1. 00 PHF Adj: LOa 1. 00 LaO 1. 00 LaO 1. 00 LOO LOO 1. 00 LaO LOO 1. 00 PHF Volume: 634 1358 708 390 2064 364 195 586 361 341 474 161 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 634 1358 708 390 2064 364 195 586 361 341 474 161 PCE Adj: LOa LaO LOO LOO 1. 00 LOO 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj; 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 LOO LaO LOO 1. 00 Final Vol.: 634 1358 708 390 2064 364 195 586 361 341 474 161 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.95 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1. 00 2.00 2.55 0.45 2.00 2.00 1. 00 2.00 2.00 1. 00 Final Sat. : 3502 5187 1615 3502 4312 761 3502 3610 1615 3502 3610 1615 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat; 0.18 0.26 0.44 0.11 0.48 0.48 0.06 0.16 0.22 0.10 0.13 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.18 0.54 0.54 0.14 0.49 0.49 0.10 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.23 0.23 Volume/Cap: 0.98 0.49 0.82 0.82 0.98 0.98 0.57 0.71 0.98 0.98 0.57 0.43 Uniform Del: 56.8 20.4 26.8 58.8 35.2 35.2 60.4 49.8 53.7 62.9 47.8 46.1 IncrerrmtDel: 30.4 0.1 6.1 10.6 13.8 13.8 2.3 2.9 41.6 42.9 1.0 0.8 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 LaO 1.00 1. 00 LOa LOO LOO 1. 00 LOO LOa 1. 00 Delay/Veh: 87.2 20.5 32.9 69.3 49.0 49.0 62.7 52.8 95.3 105.8 48.8 46.9 User DelAdj: LOO 1. 00 LOa 1. 00 LaO 1. 00 1. 00 LOa 1. 00 LOa LOa 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 87.2 20.5 32.9 69.3 49.0 49.0 62.7 52.8 95.3 105.8 48.8 46.9 LOS by Move: F C C E D D E D F F D D HCM2kAvgQ; 19 13 26 11 43 43 5 13 20 11 10 6 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyrighl (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:01 :432007 Page 3. 5 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing PM Intersection #2: Homestead/Blaney Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Voi: 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 ~.4+~~ Signal=Protect Signal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: 7/17/2007 Rights=lnctude Lanes: Final Voi: j. Cycle Time (see): 100 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 0 914'" -... Critical V/C: 0.511 ....-- 2 681 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 17.2 1= 0 193 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 13.5 178'" LOS: 8 ~ ----t t ~ ~ Lanes: 0 0 0 1 Final Vol: 108 0 158'" Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Street Name: Blaney Avenue Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << PM Peak Base Vol: 108 0 158 0 0 0 0 914 193 178 681 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 108 0 158 0 0 0 0 914 193 178 681 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 108 0 158 0 0 0 0 914 193 178 681 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 108 0 158 0 0 0 0 914 193 178 681 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 108 0 158 0 0 0 0 914 193 178 681 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 108 0 158 0 0 0 0 914 193 178 681 0 ____________1_______________11_______________11_______________11 ---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.65 0.35 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 2903 613 1805 3610 0 ____________1_______________11_______________11_______________11_______________I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.10 0.19 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.00 0.19 Volume/Cap: 0.31 0.00 0.51 Uniform Del: 34.8 0.0 36.2 IncrernntDel: 0.5 0.0 1.4 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 35.3 0.0 37.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 35.3 0.0 37.7 LOS by Move: DAD HCM2kAvgQ: 3 0 5 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.62 0.51 10.8 0.2 0.0 1. 00 11.0 1. 00 11.0 B 10 **** 0.62 0.51 10.8 0.2 0.0 1. 00 11. 0 1. 00 11.0 B 10 **** 0.19 0.51 36.1 1.3 0.0 1. 00 37.4 1. 00 37.4 D 5 0.81 0.23 2.3 0.0 0.0 1. 00 2.3 1. 00 2.3 A 3 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyrighl (e) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Frj Oct 05 12:01 :43 2007 Page 3. 6 Level Of Service Compulation Report 2000 HCM Opera lions (Future Volume Alternelive) Background PM Intersection #2: Homestead/Blaney Signal=ProlecVRights=include Final Vol: 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 ..-J4...~~ Signal=Prolecl Signal=Prolecl Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnl Dale: 7/17/2007 Righls=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: Ja Cycle Time (sec): 100 -+-.. 0 0 0 ~ Loss Time (sec): 0 ~ 0 0 924'" ---11Io- Crilical VIC: 0.518 -Ill(- 2 692 r AV9 Cril Del (sec/veh): 17.3 T 0 195 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 13.6 161'" LOS: B ~ ~ t t+ r+ Lanes: 1 0 0 0 Final Vol: 108 0 161'" Signal=ProlecVRights=lnclude Street Name: Blaney Avenue Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---;...-----------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << PM Peak Base Vol: 108 0 158 0 0 0 0 914 193 178 681 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 108 0 158 0 0 0 0 914 193 178 681 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Tr: 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 10 2 3 11 0 Initial Fut: 108 0 161 0 0 0 0 924 195 181 692 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 108 0 161 0 0 0 0 924 195 181 692 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 108 0 161 0 0 0 0 924 195 181 692 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 108 0 161 0 0 0 0 924 195 181 692 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.65 0.35 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 2903 613 1805 3610 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.10 0.19 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.00 0.19 Volume/Cap: 0.31 0.00 0.52 Uniform Del: 34.7 0.0 36.2 IncrernntDel: 0.5 0.0 1.5 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 35.2 0.0 37.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 35.2 0.0 37.8 LOS by Move: DAD HCM2kAvgQ: 3 0 5 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.61 0.52 10.9 0.2 0.0 1. 00 11.1 1. 00 11.1 B 10 **** 0.61 0.52 10.9 0.2 0.0 1. 00 11.1 1. 00 11.1 B 10 **** 0.19 0.52 36.1 1.4 0.0 1. 00 37.5 1. 00 37.5 D 6 0.81 0.24 2.3 0.0 0.0 1. 00 2.3 1. 00 2.3 A 3 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyrighl (c) 2005 Dowling Associales, Inc. Licensed 10 Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:01 :432007 Page 3. 7 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Project PM Intersection #2: Homestead/Blaney Slgnal=ProlecVRighls=lncl ude Final Vol: 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 ~4t~~ Signal=Prolect Signal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 7/17/2007 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (see): 100 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 .t- O 0 935""" -.. Critical vie: 0.521 -t- 2 704 r Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 17.3 1= 0 195 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 13.5 181'- LOS: B ~ ~ t 1+ r+ Lanes: 0 0 1 Final Vol: 108 0 161'" Signal=ProlecVRighls=lnclude Street Name: Blaney Avenue Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movernen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ____________1_______________11_______________11 _______________11_______________1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << PM Peak Base Vol: 108 0 161 0 0 0 0 924 195 181 692 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 108 0 161 0 0 0 0 924 195 181 692 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 12 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 108 0 161 0 0 0 0 935 195 181 704 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 108 0 161 0 0 0 0 935 195 181 704 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 108 0 161 0 0 0 0 935 195 181 704 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 108 0 161 0 0 0 0 935 195 181 704 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 ~.OO 0.00 0.00 1.65 0.35 1.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 2909 607 1805 3610 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.10 0.20 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.00 0.19 Volume/Cap: 0.31 0.00 0.52 Uniform Del: 34.8 0.0 36.3 IncrernntDel: 0.5 0.0 1.6 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 35.3 0.0 37.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 35.3 0.0 37.9 LOS by Move: DAD HCM2kAvgQ: 3 0 5 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.62 0.52 10.8 0.2 0.0 1. 00 11.1 1. 00 11.1 B 10 **** 0.62 0.52 10.8 0.2 0.0 1. 00 11.1 1. 00 11.1 B 10 **** 0.19 0.52 36.3 1.4 0.0 1. 00 37.7 1. 00 37.7 D 6 0.81 0.24 2.3 0.0 0.0 1. 00 2.3 1. 00 2.3 A 3 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associales, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:01 :43 2007 Page 3. 8 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Allernative) Future Growth PM Intersection #2: Homestead/Blaney Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 0 0 0 Lanes: 00000 ~4~~~ Signal=Prolecl Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rlghls=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: .J. Cycle Time (see): 100 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 0 96B""" --.... Critical VIC: 0.540 +- 2 729 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 17.6 r 0 202 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 13.7 18r" LOS: B ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 1 0 0 0 Final Vol: 112 0 167'" Signal=ProlecVRighls=lnclude Street Name: Blaney Avenue Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 112 0 167 0 0 0 0 968 202 187 729 0 Growth Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 112 0 167 0 0 0 0 968 202 187 729 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 112 0 167 0 0 0 0 968 202 187 729 0 User Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Volume: 112 0 167 0 0 0 0 968 202 187 729 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 112 0 167 0 0 0 0 968 202 187 729 0 PCE Adj : 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Final Vol. : 112 0 167 0 0 0 0 968 202 187 729 0 ____________1_______________11_______________ 11---------------11 _______________1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1. 00 0.85 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.95 1. 00 Lanes: 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 65 0.35 1. 00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat. : 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 2909 607 1805 3610 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.10 0.20 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.19 0.81 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.32 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.25 0.00 Uniform Del: 34.8 0.0 36.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11. 0 11. 0 36.4 2.3 0.0 IncrernntDel: 0.5 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 1.7 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 35.4 0.0 38.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 11. 3 38.1 2.3 0.0 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 35.4 0.0 38.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 11. 3 38.1 2.3 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D A A A A B B D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 11 11 6 3 0 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associales, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:01 :432007 Page 3- 9 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) EXisting PM Intersection #3: HomesteadlWolfe Signal=PnotecVRights=lnclude Final Voi: 146 1127-' 158 Lanes: 0 1 2 0 2 ~4.~~ Signai=Protect Signal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 7/17/2007 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (see): 110 ~ 158 0 89 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 J- 0 556'" 2 -+- Critical V/C: 0.661 ....- 574 0 r Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 35.4 1= 0 212 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 33.5 331'" LOS: C ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Vol: 260'" 653 118 Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ____________1_______________11_______________11_______________11___________----I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << PM Peak Base Vol: 260 653 118 158 1127 146 158 556 212 331 574 89 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 260 653 118 158 1127 146 158 556 212 331 574 89 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 260 653 118 158 1127 146 158 556 212 331 574 89 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 260 653 118 158 1127 146 158 556 212 331 574 89 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 260 653 118 158 1127 146 158 556 212 331 574 89 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 260 653 118 158 1127 146 158 556 212 331 574 89 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.93 0.93 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.66 0.34 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.73 0.27 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1615 3502 4514 585 1805 3610 1615 1805 3063 475 ------------1---------------11---------------'11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.18 0.07 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.09 0.15 0.13 0.18 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.11 Volume/Cap: 0.66 Uniform Del: 46.8 IncremntDel: 4.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 51.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 51.0 LOS by Move: D HCM2kAvgQ: 6 0.39 0.46 24.8 0.2 0.0 1. 00 25.1 1. 00 25.1 C 9 0.39 0.19 21.9 0.1 0.0 1. 00 22.1 1. 00 22.1 C 3 **** 0.10 0.46 46.9 1.0 0.0 1. 00 47.9 1. 00 47.9 D 3 0.38 0.66 28.4 0.9 0.0 1. 00 29.3 1. 00 29.3 C 14 0.38 0.66 28.4 0.9 0.0 1. 00 29.3 1. 00 29.3 C 14 0.16 0.54 42.3 2.0 0.0 1. 00 44.3 1. 00 44.3 D 6 0.23 0.66 38.3 2.0 0.0 1. 00 40.2 1. 00 40.2 D 10 **** 0.23 0.56 37.3 2.0 0.0 1. 00 39.2 1. 00 39.2 D 7 **** 0.28 0.66 35.2 3.3 0.0 1. 00 38.5 1. 00 38.5 D 11 0.35 0.54 28.8 0.5 0.0 1. 00 29.3 1. 00 29.3 C 10 0.35 0.54 28.8 0.5 0.0 1. 00 29.3 1. 00 29.3 C 10 Tralfix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, inc. Licensed 10 Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:01 :43 2007 Page 3.10 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background PM Intersection #3: HoinesteadlWolfe Signal=ProlecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 146 1159". 158 Lanes: 0 1 2 0 2 -.J4~~'+ Signal=Protect Signal =Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 7/17/2007 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle Time (sec): 110 ~ 158 0 89 -t Loss Time (sec): 0 J- 0 556." 2 ----.... Critical V/C: 0.6B9 +- 574 0 r Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 36.5 1= 0 239 Avg Delay (see/veh): 34.3 356". LOS: C ~ ~ t t--- ~ Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Vol: 287". 681 146 Signal=ProlecVRights=lnclude Street Name; Wolfe Road Homestead Road Approach; North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date; 17 Jul 2007 << PM Peak Base Vol: 260 653 118 158 1127 146 158 556 212 331 574 89 Growth Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 260 653 118 158 1127 146 158 556 212 331 574 89 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Tr: 27 28 28 0 32 0 0 0 27 25 0 0 Initial Fut; 287 681 146 158 1159 146 158 556 239 356 574 89 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume; 287 681 146 158 1159 146 158 556 239 356 574 89 Reduct vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 287 681 146 158 1159 146 158 556 239 356 574 89 PCE Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.; 287 681 146 158 1159 146 158 556 239 356 574 89 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane; 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment; 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.93 0.93 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.66 0.34 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.73 0.27 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1615 3502 4528 570 1805 3610. 1615 1805 3063 475 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.19 0.09 0.05 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.12 0.40 Volume/Cap; 0.69 0.48 Uniform Del; 46.5 24.8 IncremntDel; 4.8 0.3 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj; 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh; 51.3 25.0 User DelAdj; 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 51.3 25.0 LOS by Move: D C HCM2kAvgQ; 6 9 0.40 0.23 22.1 0.2 0.0 1. 00 22.3 1. 00 22.3 C 3 **** 0.09 0.48 47.2 1.1 0.0 1. 00 48.3 1. 00 48.3 D 3 0.37 0.69 29.2 1.1 0.0 1. DO 30.3 1. 00 30.3 C 14 0.16 0.54 42.3 2.0 0.0 1. 00 44.3 1. 00 44.3 D 6 0.22 0.69 39.2 2.5 0.0 1. 00 41. 7 1. 00 41.7 D 10 **** 0.22 0.66 38.9 4.6 0.0 1. 00 43.5 1. 00 43.5 D 8 **** 0.29 0.69 34.9 3.9 0.0 1. 00 38.8 1. DO 38.8 D 12 0.35 0.54 28.8 0.5 0.0 1. 00 29.3 1. 00 29.3 C 10 0.35 0.54 28.8 0.5 0.0 1. 00 29.3 1. 00 29.3 C 10 Traffix 7.8.0915 0.37 0.69 29.2 1.1 0.0 1. 00 30.3 1. DO 30.3 C 14 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:01 :43 2007 Page 3-11 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Project PM Intersection #3: HomesteadlWolfe Signal =ProlecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 146 1170'" 156 Lanes: 01202 ~4.~~ Signal=Prolect Signal =Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: 711712007 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle Time (see): 110 ~ 176 0 69 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 .t- O 562'" 2 -.. Critical VIC: 0.699 -otC-- 574 0 =r Avg Cnt Del (secJveh): 36.6 T 0 239 Avg Delay (secJveh): 34.7 367'"' LOS: C ~ ~ t ~ r-- Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Vol: 267"" 667 152 Signal =ProlecVRighls=lnclude Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11----------'-----11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << PM Peak Base Vol: 287 681 146 158 1159 146 158 556 239 356 574 89 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 287 681 146 158 1159 146 158 556 239 356 574 89 Added Vol: 0 6 6 0 11 0 18 6 0 11 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 287 687 152 158 1170 146 176 562 239 367 574 89 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 287 687 152 158 1170 146 176 562 239 367 574 89 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 287 687 152 158 1170 146 176 562 239 367 574 89 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 287 687 152 158 1170 146 176 562 239 367 574 89 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.93 0.93 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.67 0.33 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.73 0.27 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1615 3502 4533 566 1805 3610 1615 1805 3063 475 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.19 0.09 0.05 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.16 0.15 0.20 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.70 Uniform Del: 46.7 IncremntDel: 5.3 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 52.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 52.0 LOS by Move: D HCM2kAvgQ: 6 0.39 0.48 25.0 0.3 0.0 1. 00 25.3 1. 00 25.3 C 9 0.39 0.24 22.4 0.2 0.0 1. 00 22.6 1. 00 22.6 C 3 **** 0.09 0.48 47.4 1.1 0.0 1. 00 48.5 1. 00 48.5 D 3 0.37 0.70 29.5 1.2 0.0 1. 00 30.7 1. 00 30.7 C 15 0.37 0.70 29.5 1.2 0.0 1. 00 30.7 1. 00 30.7 C 15 0.18 0.55 41.4 2.2 0.0 1. 00 43.6 1. 00 43.6 D 6 0.22 0.70 39.4 2.7 0.0 1. 00 42.1 1. 00 42.1 D 10 **** 0.22 0.66 39.0 4.6 0.0 1. 00 43.7 1. 00 43.7 D 8 **** 0.29 0.70 34.7 4.2 0.0 1. 00 38.9 1. 00 38.9 D 12 0.34 0.55 29.7 0.6 0.0 1. 00 30.3 1. 00 30.3 C 10 0.34 0.55 29.7 0.6 0.0 1. 00 30.3 1. 00 30.3 C 10 T raffix 7.6.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed 10 Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Ocl 05 12:01 :43 2007 Page 3.12 Level 01 Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Allernative) Future Growth PM Intersection #3: HomesteadMlolfe Signal=Prolec\lRighls=lnclude Final Vol: 151 1211-' 164 Lanes: 0 1 2 0 2 ~4.~~ Signal=Prolecl Signal=Prolecl Flnal Vol: Lanes: Rights=Jnclude Vol Cn! Date: nla Righls=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: ~ Cycle Time (see): 110 ~ 182 0 92 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 .t- O 582'" 2 -.. Crillcal VIC: 0.723 ...- 595 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 37.5 ~ 0 247 Avg Delay (seclveh): 35.3 .- 379'" LOS: D ~ ~ t .,. ~ Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Vol: 296'" 711 158 Si9nal=ProlecVRighls=lnclude Street Name: Wol fe Road Homes tead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 296 711 156 164 1211 151 182 582 247 379 595 92 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 296 711 156 164 1211 151 182 582 247 379 595 92 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByvol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 296 711 156 164 1211 151 182 582 247 379 595 92 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 296 711 156 164 1211 151 182 582 247 379 595 92 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 296 711 156 164 1211 151 182 582 247 379 595 92 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol. : 296 711 156 164 1211 151 182 582 247 379 595 92 ------------1---------------11---------------11--------------- J 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.93 0.93 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.67 0.33 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.73 0.27 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1615 3502 4534 565 1805 3610 1615 1805 3064 474 -----------~ 1---------------11---------------[1---------------11---------------[ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.20 0.10 0.05 0.27 0.27 0.10 0.16 0.15 0.21 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.72 Uniform Del: 46.8 IncremntDel: 6.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/veh: 53.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 53.1 LOS by Move: D HCM2kAvgQ: 7 0.39 0.50 25.2 0.3 0.0 1. 00 25.5 1. 00 25.5 C 10 0.39 0.25 22.4 0.2 0.0 1. 00 22.6 1. 00 22.6 C 4 0.09 0.50 47.4 1.2 0.0 1. 00 48.6 1. 00 48.6 D 3 **** 0.37 0.72 29.8 1.4 0.0 1. 00 31.2 1. 00 31.2 C 15 0.37 0.72 29.8 1.4 0.0 1. 00 31.2 1. 00 31.2 C 15 0.18 0.57 41.6 2.6 0.0 1. 00 44.1 1. 00 44.1 D 6 0.22 0.72 39.6 3.3 0.0 1. 00 42.8 1. 00 42.8 D 11 **** 0.22 0.69 39.2 5.4 0.0 1. 00 44.6 1. 00 44.6 D 9 **** 0.29 0.72 35.0 4.9 0.0 1. 00 40.0 1. 00 40.0 D 13 0.34 0.57 29.9 0.7 0.0 1. 00 30.6 1. 00 30.6 C 10 0.34 0.57 29.9 0.7 0.0 1. 00 30.6 1. 00 30.6 C 10 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fr; Oct 05 12:01 :432007 Page 3-13 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HeM Operations (Future Volume Allemative) Existing PM Intersection #4: Wolfe/Pruneridge Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 24 1315 116'" Lanes: 01 201 -.J4.~~ Signal=Protect Signal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 7/1712007 Righls=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (sec): 110 ~ 24 37 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 J.- 0 0 14'" 0 ----... Critical VlC: 0.524 ...- 1 41 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 28.1 1= 0 116 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 24.7 2 415." LOS: C ~ ~ t t+- ~ Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Vol: 171 942". 0 Signal=ProlecVRights=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road Pruneridge Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << PM Peak Base Vol: 171 942 177 118 1315 24 24 14 116 415 41 37 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 171 942 177 118 1315 24 24 14 116 415 41 37 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 171 942 177 118 1315 24 24 14 116 415 41 37 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 171 942 0 118 1315 24 24 14 116 415 41 37 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 171 942 0 118 1315 24 24 14 116 415 41 37 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 171 942 0 118 1315 24 24 14 116 415 41 37 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.87 0.87 0.92 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 0.11 0.89 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1900 1805 5079 93 1805 177 1468 3502 1900 1615 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.26 0.00 0.07 0.26 0.26 0.01 0.08 0.08 0.12 0.02 0.02 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.10 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.49 0.52 Uniform Del: 47.0 18.7 IncremntDel: 1.1 0.3 InitQueuDe1: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 48.1 19.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh:' 48.1 19.0 LOS by Move: D B HCM2kAvgQ: 3 11 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.12 0.52 45.1 2.2 0.0 1. 00 47.3 1. 00 47.3 D 4 0.52 0.49 16.8 0.1 0.0 1. 00 17.0 1. 00 17.0 B 11 0.52 0.49 16.8 0.1 0.0 1. 00 17.0 1. 00 17.0 B 11 0.14 0.10 41.4 0.2 0.0 1. 00 41.5 1. DO 41.5 D 1 0.15 0.52 43.1 2.0 0.0 1. 00 45.1 1. 00 45.1 D 5 **** 0.15 0.52 43.1 2.0 0.0 1. 00 45.1 1. 00 45.1 D 5 **** 0.23 0.52 37.4 0.6 0.0 1. 00 38.0 1. 00 38.0 D 7 0.24 0.09 32.6 0.1 0.0 1. 00 32.7 1. 00 32.7 C 1 0.24 0.10 32.6 0.1 0.0 1. 00 32.7 1. 00 32.7 C 1 Traffix 7.6.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fr; Oct 05 12:01 :43 2007 Page 3-14 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background PM Intersection #4: Wolfe/Pruneridge Signal=ProtecURighls=lnclude Final Val: 24 1399'" 118 Lanes: 01201 ~4t}...'+ Signal=Protecl Signal=Prolect Final Val: Lanes: Rlghls=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: 7/1712007 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Val: ..f Cycle Time (sec): 110 ~ 24 37 ~ Lass Time (sec): 0 .t- O 0 14'" 0 ----jIIo- Critical VlC: 0.616 .- 41 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 31.4 r 0 195 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 29.8 2 494'" LOS: C ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Vol: 252". 1026 0 Signal=ProtecURights=lgnore Street Name: Wol fe Road Pruneridge Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Ju1 2007 << PM Peak Base Vol: 171 942 177 118 1315 24 24 14 116 415 41 37 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 171 942 177 118 1315 24 24 14 116 415 41 37 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Tr: 81 84 84 0 84 0 0 0 79 79 0 0 Initial Fut: 252 1026 261 118 1399 24 24 14 195 494 41 37 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 252 1026 0 118 1399 24 24 14 195 494 41 37 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 252 1026 0 118 1399 24 24 14 195 494 41 37 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 252 1026 0 118 1399 24 24 14 195 494 41 37 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.86 0.86 0.92 1."00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 0.07 0.93 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1900 1805 5084 87 1805 109 1525 3502 1900 1615 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.28 0.00 0.07 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.14 0.02 0.02 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.62 Uniform Del: 46.2 IncremntDel: 2.8 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 49.0 User De1Adj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 49.0 LOS by Move: D HCM2kAvgQ: 5 0.46 0.62 22.6 0.7 0.0 1. 00 23.3 1. 00 23.3 C 14 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.11 0.62 47.1 6.2 0.0 1. 00 53.3 1. 00 53.3 D 5 0.45 0.62 23.2 0.5 0.0 1. 00 23.7 1. 00 23.7 C 14 0.45 0.62 23.2 0.5 0.0 1. 00 23.7 1. 00 23.7 C 14 0.16 0.08 39.3 0.1 0.0 1. 00 39.4 1. 00 39.4 D 1 0.21 0.62 39.6 3.4 0.0 1. 00 43.0 1. 00 43.0 D 7 **** 0.21 0.62 39.6 3.4 0.0 1. 00 43.0 1. 00 43.0 D 7 **** 0.23 0.62 38.1 1.4 0.0 1. 00 39.5 1. 00 39.5 D 8 0.28 0.08 29.4 0.1 0.0 1. 00 29.5 1. 00 29.5 C 1 0.28 0.08 29.5 0.1 0.0 1. 00 29.6 1. 00 29.6 C 1 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. licensed to HeKagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Ocl 05 12:01 :432007 Page 3-15 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Project PM Intersection #4: WolfelPruneridge Signal=ProtecVRights= Include Final Vol: 24 1399'" 118 Lanes: 0 1 2 0 1 ~4.}"~ Signal=Protect Signal=Prolecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnl Dale: 7/17/2007 Rlghls=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: ja Cycle Time (sec): 110 ~ 36 37 --t Loss Time (sec): 0 ~ 0 0 26'" 0 -.. Crilical V/C: 0.651 ...- 52 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 33.4 1= 0 227 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 31.6 2 494'" LOS: C ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Vol: 282'" 1026 0 Signal=ProlecVRighls=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road Pruneridge Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 17 Jul 2007 << PM Peak Base Vol: 252 1026 261 118 1399 24 24 14 195 494 41 37 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 252 1026 261 118 1399 24 24 14 195 494 41 37 Added Vol: 30 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 32 0 11 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 282 1026 261 118 1399 24 36 26 227 494 52 37 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 282 1026 0 118 1399 24 36 26 227 494 52 37 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 282 1026 0 118 1399 24 36 26 227 494 52 37 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 282 1026 0 118 1399 24 36 26 227 494 52 37 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.87 0.87 0.92 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 0.10 0.90 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1900 1805 5084 87 1805 169 1475 3502 1900 1615 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.28 0.00 0.07 0.28 0.28 0.02 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.03 0.02 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.65 Uniform Del: 45.9 IncremntDel: 3.5 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 49.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 49.4 LOS by Move: D HCM2kAvgQ: 6 0.44 0.64 23.7 0.9 0.0 1. 00 24.6 1. 00 24.6 C 15 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.10 0.64 47.4 7.3 0.0 1. 00 54.8 1. 00 54.8 D 5 0.42 0.65 25.3 0.7 0.0 1. 00 26.0 1. 00 26.0 C 14 0.42 0.65 25.3 0.7 0.0 1. 00 26.0 1. 00 26.0 C 14 0.19 0.10 36.7 0.1 0.0 1. 00 36.9 1. 00 36.9 D 1 0.24 0.65 37.9 3.9 0.0 1. 00 41. 8 1. 00 41. 8 D 9 **** 0.24 0.65 37.9 3.9 0.0 1. 00 41.8 1. 00 41.8 D 9 **** 0.22 0.65 39.3 2.0 0.0 1. 00 41.3 1. 00 41.3 D 9 0.26 0.10 30.8 0.1 0.0 1. 00 30.9 1. 00 30.9 C 1 0.26 0.09 30.6 0.1 0.0 1. 00 30.7 1. 00 30.7 C 1 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associales. Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:01 :432007 Page 3.16 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Future Growth PM Intersection #4: Wolfe/Pruneridge Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Final Vol: 25 1446'" 122 Lanes: 0 1 2 0 1 ~4+}t..'-. Signal =Protecl Signal=Prolect Final Vol: Lanes: R.ghts=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: nla Rights=include Lanes: Final Vol: ~ Cyde Time (see): 110 ~ 37 38 ~ Loss Time (see): 0 J- 0 0 27'" 0 -. Critical V/C: 0.55S ..- 53 =r Avg Cril Del (secfveh): 33.7 T 0 231 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 32.0 2 50S'" LOS: C ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 2 0 2 0 Final Vol: 288'" 1060 0 Signal=ProlectlRighls=lgnore Street Name: Wol fe Road pruneridge Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 288 1060 267 122 1446 25 37 27 231 509 53 38 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 288 1060 267 122 1446 25 37 27 231 509 53 38 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 288 1060 267 122 1446 25 37 27 231 509 53 38 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 288 1060 0 122 1446 25 37 27 231 509 53 38 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 288 1060 0 122 1446 25 37 27 231 509 53 38 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 288 1060 0 122 1446 25 37 27 231 509 53 38 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.87 0.87 0.92 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 0.10 0.90 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 1900 1805 5084 88 1805 172 1473 3502 1900 1615 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.29 0.00 0.07 0.28 0.28 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.03 0.02 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.12 0.45 Volume/Cap: 0.67 0.66 Uniform Del: 46.1 23.9 IncremntDel: 4.0 1.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 50.1 24.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 50.1 24.9 LOS by Move: D C HCM2kAvgQ: 6 15 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.10 0.66 47.5 8.4 0.0 1. 00 55.9 1. 00 55.9 E 5 0.43 0.67 25.4 0.8 0.0 1. 00 26.2 1. 00 26.2 C 15 0.43 0.67 25.4 0.8 0.0 1. 00 26.2 1. 00 26.2 C 15 0.19 0.11 36.7 0.1 0.0 1. 00 36.9 1. 00 36.9 D 1 0.23 0.67 38.2 4.5 0.0 1. 00 42.7 1. 00 42.7 D 9 **** 0.23 0.67 38.2 4.5 0.0 1. 00 42.7 1. 00 42.7 D 9 **** 0.22 0.67 39.4 2.3 0.0 1. 00 41.7 1. 00 41.7 D 9 0.26 0.11 30.9 0.1 0.0 1. 00 31. 0 1. 00 31.0 C 1 0.26 0.09 30.8 0.1 0.0 1. 00 30.9 1. 00 30.9 C 1 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:01 :43 2007 Page 3-17 level Of Service Computation Repor1 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing PM Intersection #5: Wolfe/l-280 NB Ramp Signal=ProtectlRights=lgnore Final Vol: 0 1295'" 0 lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 ~4+f.~ Signal=Protecl Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 10/3/2006 Rights=lnclude lanes: Final Vol: ..f Cycle Time (see): 55 ~ 0 0 440'" -.t loss TIme (see): 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 -+ Critical V/C: 0.523 +- 11 0 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 8.7 T 0 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 7.2 325 LOS: A ~ +t t ~ ~ Lanes: 00 2 00 Final Vol: 0'" 709 0 Signal=ProtecVRights=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road 1-280 NB Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 __n________1 n____n_____n II n__nnn_n__II_n_nn___nn II nn_nnnnn 1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << PM Peak Base Vol: 0 709 0 0 1295 0 0 0 0 325 0 440 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 709 0 0 1295 0 0 0 0 325 0 440 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 709 0 0 1295 0 0 0 0 325 0 440 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 709 0 0 1295 0 0 0 0 325 0 440 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 709 0 0 1295 0 0 0 0 325 0 440 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 709 0 0 1295 0 0 0 0 325 0 440 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.89 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.42 0.00 1.58 Final Sat.: 0 3610 0 0 3610 0 0 0 0 2422 0 2678 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.16 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.69 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.29 Uniform Del: 0.0 3.4 1ncrernntDel: 0.0 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 3.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 3.4 LOS by Move: A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 3 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.69 0.52 4.2 0.2 0.0 1. 00 4.4 1. 00 4.4 A 6 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.31 0.43 14.9 0.2 0.0 1. 00 15.1 1. 00 15.1 B 3 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.31 0.52 15.5 0.3 0.0 1. 00 15.8 1. 00 15.8 B 5 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fr; Oct 05 12:01 :432007 Page 3.18 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (FLJlure Volume Alternative) Background PM Intersection #5: Wolfefl-280 NB Ramp Signal=ProlecVRights=lgnore Final Vol: 0 1537*- 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 ~4.~~ Signal =Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: 10/312006 Rights=lncl ude Lanes: Final Vol: J. Cycle Time (see): 55 ~ 0 0 440 ~ Loss Time (see): .t- O 0 0 0 -. Critical VIC: 0.654 1- 1! 0 0 r Avg Grit Del (seclveh): 10.4 r 0 0 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 8.7 628'" LOS: A ~ ~ t t--- r+ Lanes: 00 2 00 Final Vol: 0'" 958 0 Signal=ProtecURighls=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << PM Peak Base Vol: 0 709 0 0 1295 0 0 0 0 325 0 440 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 709 0 0 1295 0 0 0 0 325 0 440 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Tr: 0 249 0 0 242 0 0 0 0 303 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 958 0 0 1537 0 0 0 0 628 0 440 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 958 0 0 1537 0 0 0 0 628 0 440 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 958 0 0 1537 0 0 0 0 628 0 440 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 958 0 0 1537 0 0 0 0 628 0 440 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.59 0.00 1.41 Final Sat.: 0 3610 0 0 3610 0 0 0 0 2748 0 2443 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.18 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.65 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.41 Uniform Del: 0.0 4.6 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 4.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 4.7 LOS by l~ove: A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 4 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.65 0.65 5.8 0.7 0.0 1. 00 6.5 1. 00 6.5 A 9 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.35 0.65 15.1 1.0 0.0 1. 00 16.1 1. 00 16.1 B 7 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.35 0.52 14.2 0.2 0.0 1. 00 14.4 1. 00 14.4 B 5 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed \0 Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Ocl 05 12:01 :43 2007 Page 3-19 Level or Service Compulation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Project PM Intersection #5: Wolfell-280 NB Ramp Signal=ProlecVRights=lgnore Final Vol: 0 1561'- 0 Lanes: 00 2 00 ~4+~~ Signal=ProleCl Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: 10/3/2006 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: ~ Cycle Time (see): 55 ~ 0 0 447 -t Loss Time (sec): 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ---III- Critical Vie: 0.661 ...- 1! 0 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 10.5 1= 0 0 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): B.7 62B'" LOS: A ~ +t t ~ r+ Lanes: 00200 Final Vol: 0- 9BO 0 Signal =ProtecVRighls=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------I Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << PM Peak Base Vol: 0 958 0 0 1537 0 0 0 0 628 0 440 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 958 0 0 1537 0 0 0 0 628 0 440 Added Vol: 0 22 0 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 7 PasserByVo1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 980 0 0 1561 8 0 0 0 628 0 447 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 980 0 0 1561 0 0 0 0 628 0 447 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 980 0 0 1561 0 0 0 0 628 0 447 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 980 0 0 1561 0 0 0 0 628 0 447 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.58 0.00 1.42 Final Sat.: 0 3610 0 0 3610 0 0 0 0 2744 0 2453 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.18 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 LOS by Move: A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0.65 0.42 4.5 0.1 0.0 1. 00 4.6 1. 00 4.6 A 4 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.65 0.66 5.8 0.7 0.0 1. 00 6.5 1. 00 6.5 A 10 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.35 0.66 15.2 1.0 0.0 1. 00 16.3 1. 00 16.3 B 7 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.35 0.53 14.4 0.3 0.0 1. 00 14.6 1. 00 14.6 B 5 Tralfix 7.B.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Frl Ocl 05 12:01 :43 2007 Page 3.20 Level Of Service Compulation Report 2000 HCM Operalions (Future Volume Alternative) Future Growth PM Intersection #5: Wolfell-280 NB Ramp Signal=ProtecVRights=lgnore Final Vol: 0 1608". 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 ~4+~'+ Signal=Protecl Signal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=lnclude Vol Cnl Date: nla Righls=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: -+ Cycle Time (sec): 55 ~ 0 0 463 ~ Loss Time (sec): 0 J- 0 0 0 0 ~ Critical V/C: 0.679 ...- 1! 0 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 10.7 T 0 0 0 Avg Delay (seclveh): 8.9 640'" LOS: A ~ ~ t t--- r+- Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 Final Vol: 0'" 1 006 0 Signal=ProtecVRights=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road 1-280 NB Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1006 103 0 1608 624 0 0 0 640 0 463 Growth Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 0 1006 103 0 1608 624 0 0 0 640 0 463 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 passerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1006 103 0 1608 624 0 0 0 640 0 463 User Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Volume: 0 1006 0 0 1608 0 0 0 0 640 0 463 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1006 0 0 1608 0 0 0 0 640 0 463 PCE Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Final Vol. : 0 1006 0 0 1608 0 0 0 0 640 0 463 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1. 00 0.95 0.95 1. 00 0.95 0.95 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 0.91 1. 00 0.91 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 58 0.00 1. 42 Final Sat. : 0 3610 0 0 3610 0 0 0 0 2735 0 2457 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.19 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.34 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.55 Uniform Del: 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.4 0.0 14.6 1ncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.3 1nitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1. 00 0.00, 0.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.6 0.0 14.9 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.6 0.0 14.9 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A B A B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 7 0 5 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copynght (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12;01 ;43 2007 Page 3-21 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Allernative) Existing PM Intersection #6: Wolfell-280 SB Ramp Signal=ProlecVRights=lgnore Final Vol; 0 1288... 0 Lanes: 00 300 ..-J4.~'+ Signal=Prolecl Signal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnl Date: 1 0/3/2006 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Fmal Vol: J- Cyde Time (sec): 55 ~ 460... 2 0 0 ~ Loss Time (sec): 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 -.. Critical V/C: 0.380 ....- 0 0 0 r Avg Cril Del (seclveh): 6.9 1= 0 370 2 Avg Delay (seclveh): 7.1 0 LOS: A ~ ~ t t-- ~ Lanes: 0 0 2 0 0 Final Vol: 0." 739 0 Signal=ProlecVRighls=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road 1-280 SB Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ t ---------------11---------------1 ] ---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << PM Peak Base Vol: 0 739 0 0 1288 0 460 0 370 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 739 0 0 1288 0 460 0 370 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 739 0 0 1288 0 460 0 370 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 739 0 0 1288 0 460 0 370 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 739 0 0 1288 0 460 0 370 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 739 0 0 1288 0 460 0 370 0 0 0 ------------ 1_______________ II --------------- II---------------II-------n------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 0 0 5187 0 3502 0 2842 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 LOS by Move: A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0.65 0.31 4.1 0.1 0.0 1. 00 4.2 1. 00 4.2 A 3 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.65 0.38 4.4 0.1 0.0 1. 00 4.5 1. 00 4.5 A 4 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.35 0.38 13.5 0.2 0.0 1. 00 13.7 1. 00 13.7 B 3 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.35 0.38 13 .5 0.2 0.0 1. 00 13 .8 1. 00 13.8 B 3 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:01 :43 2007 Page 3-22 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HeM Operations (Future Volume Allernative) Background PM Intersection #6: Wolfe/l-280 58 Ramp Signal :ProlecVRights:lgnore Final Vol: 0 1835 0-' Lanes: 0 0 3 0 0 -.J4+~\:" Signal:Protect Signal:Prolecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights:lnciude Vol Cnt Date: 1 0/3/2005 Righls:lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j-. Cycle Time (see): 55 ~ 450 2 0 0 -!. Loss Time (see): J-- 0 0 0 0 -. Critical V/C: 0.588 .- 0 0 0 r Avg Crit Oel {seclvehl: 9.4 1= 0 651-' 2 Avg Delay {seclveh): 8.5 0 0 LOS: A ~ ~ t 1+ ~ Lanes: 0 2 0 0 Final Vol: 0 1284-' 0 Signal:ProtecVRights:lgnore Wolfe Road 1-280 SB Ramp North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min _ Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << PM Peak Base Vol: 0 739 0 0 1288 0 460 0 370 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 739 0 0 1288 0 460 0 370 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Tr: 0 545 0 0 547 0 0 0 291 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1284 0 0 1835 0 460 0 661 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1284 0 0 1835 0 460 0 661 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1284 0 0 1835 0 460 0 661 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 1284 0 0 1835 0 460 0 661 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 0 0 5187 0 3502 0 2842 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.60 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.59 Uniform Del: 0.0 6.7 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.4 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 7.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 7.1 LOS by Move: A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 Street Name: Approach: Movemen t : **** 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.60 0.59 6.7 0.3 0.0 1. 00 6.9 1. 00 6.9 A 8 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.40 0.33 11. 6 0.1 0.0 1. 00 11.7 1. 00 11.7 B 3 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.40 0.59 13 .1 0.8 0.0 1. 00 13.9 1. 00 13.9 B 6 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o Traffix 7.8.0915 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o Copyright (cl 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Ocl 0512:01:43 2007 Page 3-23 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Project PM Intersection #6: Wolfe/l-28D SB Ramp Signal=ProlecVRights=lgnore Final Vol: 0 1851'" 0 Lanes: 00 3 00 .-J4+~~ Signal=Prolect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 1 0/3/2006 Righls=lnclude j- Cycle Time (sec): 55 ~ 467 2 ~ Loss Time (sec): ~ 0 0 0 ----.... Crilical VIC: 0.589 ..- 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 8.8 1= 661'" 2 Avg Delay (seclveh): 8.6 LOS: A ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 0 0 2 0 Final Vol: 0'" 1299 0 Signal=ProtecVRlghts=lgnore Lanes: Final Vol: o 0 o o o o 0 Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 SB Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << PM Peak Base Vol: 0 1284 0 0 1835 0 460 0 661 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1284 0 0 1835 0 460 0 661 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 15 0 0 16 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1299 0 0 1851 8 467 0 661 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1299 0 0 1851 0 467 0 661 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1299 0 0 1851 0 467 0 661 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 0 1299 0 0 1851 0 467 0 661 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 0.92 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 0 0 5187 0 3502 0 2842 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 LOS by Move: A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0.61 0.59 6.7 0.4 0.0 1. 00 7.1 1. 00 7.1 A 8 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o **** 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.61 0.59 6.7 0.3 0.0 1. 00 7.0 1. 00 7.0 A 8 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.39 0.34 11. 6 0.1 0.0 1. 00 11.8 1. 00 11.8 B 3 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.39 0.59 13 .1 0.8 0.0 1. 00 14.0 1. 00 14.0 B 6 **** 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 1. 00 0.0 A o Traffix 7.6.0915 Copyright (e) 2005 Dowling Associates, Ine. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:01:43 2007 Page 3.24 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Future Growth PM Intersection #6: Wolfe/l-280 S8 Ramp Signal=ProtecVRights=lgnore Final Vol: 0 1 B97'" 0 Lanes: DO 3 DO ~4+~~ Signal=Prolecl Signal=Prolect Final Voi: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: nfa Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: j Cycle Time (see): 55 ~ 4B4 2 0 0 ~ Loss Time (see): J- 0 0 0 0 ----... Crilical VlC: 0.603 <If- 0 0 0 r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): B.9 r 0 674'" 2 Avg Delay (sedveh): B.7 0 0 LOS: A ~ +t t ~ ~ Lanes: DO 2 DO Final Vol: 0'" 1326 0 Signal=ProlecVRights=lgnore Street Name: Wolfe Road 1-280 SB Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1326 399 0 1897 313 484 0 674 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 0 1326 399 0 1897 313 484 0 674 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1326 399 0 1897 313 484 0 674 0 0 0 User Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Volume: 0 1326 0 0 1897 0 484 0 674 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1326 0 0 1897 0 484 0 674 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Final Vol. : 0 1326 0 0 1897 0 484 0 674 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1. 00 0.95 0.95 1. 00 0.91 0.91 0.92 1. 00 0.75 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat. : 0 3610 0 0 5187 0 3502 0 2842 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 11.7 0.0 13 .3 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 0.00 1. 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 11. 9 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDe1/Veh: 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 11. 9 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A A A A B A B A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 0 0 8 0 3 0 6 0 0 0 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associales, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fr! Oct 05 12:01 :432007 Page 3.25 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) E<isling PM Intersection #7: Wolfe/Stevens Creek S,gnal=ProlecVRighls=lnclude Final Vol: 389'" 831 297 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 ..-J4~'}'~ Signal=Prolecl Signal=PrOlecl Final Vol: Lanes: Righls=tnclude Vol Cnt Dale: 1013/2006 Righls=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: ~ Cycle Time (sec): 110 +-- 445'" 2 0 291 ~ Loss Time (sec): 0 .t- O 1095 3 ---.... Critical V/C: 0.670 +- 2 815-- 0 =r Avg Cril Del (seclveh): 36.6 1= 0 169 Avg Delay (seclveh): 32.8 2 172 LOS: C ~~t~~ Lanes: 2 0 Final Vol: 144'" 382 57 Signal=ProlectfRights= Include Street Name: Wolfe Road Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << PM Peak Base Vol: 144 382 57 297 831 389 445 1095 169 172 815 291 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 144 382 57 297 831 389 445 1095 169 172 815 291 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 144 382 57 297 831 389 445 1095 169 172 815 291 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 144 382 57 297 831 389 445 1095 169 172 815 291 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 144 382 57 297 831 389 445 1095 169 172 815 291 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 144 382 57 297 831 389 445 1095 169 172 815 291 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.87 0.87 Lanes: 1.00 2.61 0.39 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.21 0.79 Final Sat.: 1805 4428 661 1805 3610 1615 3502 5187 1615 3502 3673 1312 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.16 0.23 0.24 0.13 0.21 0.10 0.05 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.67 Uniform Del: 46.4 IncremntDel: 7.9 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 54.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 54.3 LOS by Move: D HCM2kAvgQ: 6 0.16 0.52 42.0 0.6 0.0 1. 00 42.6 1. 00 42.6 D 6 0.16 0.52 42.0 0.6 0.0 1. 00 42.6 1. DO 42.6 D 6 0.31 0.52 31.0 0.9 0.0 1. 00 31.9 1. 00 31.9 C 9 0.36 0.64 29.3 1.1 0.0 1. 00 30.4 1. 00 30.4 C 13 0.36 0.67 29.7 3.0 0.0 1. 00 32.7 1. 00 32.7 C 12 **** **** 0.19 0.67 41.4 2.7 0.0 1. 00 44.0 1. DO 44.0 D 8 0.42 0.50 23.2 0.2 0.0 1. 00 23.4 1. 00 23.4 C 10 0.42 0.25 20.5 0.2 0.0 1. 00 20.7 1. DO 20.7 C 4 0.10 0.50 47.0 1.1 0.0 1. 00 48.2 1. DO 48.2 D 3 0.33 0.67 31.6 1.1 0.0 1. 00 32.7 1. DO 32.7 C 13 **** 0.33 0.67 31. 6 1.1 0.0 1. DO 32.7 1. 00 32.7 C 13 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed 10 He<agon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:01 :432007 Page 3-26 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HeM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background PM Intersection #7: Wolfe/Stevens Creek Signal ;ProtecVRighls;lnclude Final Vol: 691." 892 583 Lanes; 1 0 2 0 1 ..v4t~~ Signal;Protect Si9nal;Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights;lnclude Vol Cnt Dale; 1013/2006 Rights;lnclude Lanes: F,nal Vol; J-- Cycle TIme (see): 110 ~ 703." 2 0 528'" ~ Loss Time (see): 0 J-- 0 1153 3 ----... Critical V/C: 1.032 ..- 2 896 0 --r Avg Crit Del (seclveh): 78.8 1= 0 169 Avg Delay (seclveh): 50.5 2 181 LOS: D ~ +t t ~ r+ Lanes; 1 0 2 0 Final Vol: 144'" 441 57 Signal;ProtecVRighls;lnclude Street Name: Wolfe Road Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << PM Peak Base Vol: 144 382 57 297 831 389 445 1095 169 172 815 291 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 144 382 57 297 831 389 445 1095 169 172 815 291 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved Tr: 0 59 0 286 61 302 258 58 0 9 81 237 Initial Fut: 144 441 57 583 892 691 703 1153 169 181 896 528 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 144 441 57 583 892 691 703 1153 ,169 181 896 528 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 144 441 57 583 892 691 703 1153 169 181 896 528 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 144 441 57 583 892 691 703 1153 169 181 896 528 ------------\ _______________11_______________11_______________11_______________I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.86 0.86 Lanes: 1.00 2.66 0.34 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 4515 584 1805 3610 1615 3502 5187 1615 3502 3264 1632 ____________1_______________11 _______________11_______________11_______________1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat:. 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.32 0.25 0.43 0.20 0.22 0.10 0.05 0.27 0.32 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.08 Volume/Cap: 1.03 Uniform Del: 50.7 IncremntDel: 84.9 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 135.6 User De1Adj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 135.6 LOS by Move: F HCM2kAvgQ: 9 0.11 0.86 47.8 11.9 0.0 1. 00 59.7 1. 00 59.7 E 9 0.11 0.86 47.8 11. 9 0.0 1. 00 59.7 1. 00 59.7 E 9 0.38 0.86 31. 5 10.3 0.0 1. 00 41.8 1. 00 41. 8 D 21 0.41 1. 03 32.2 43.2 0.0 1. 00 75.4 1. 00 75.4 E 32 **** **** 0.19 1. 03 44.3 42.9 0.0 1. 00 87.2 1. 00 87.2 F 19 0.41 0.54 24.4 0.3 0.0 1. 00 24.7 1. 00 24.7 C 11 0.41 0.25 21.2 0.2 0.0 1. 00 21.4 1. 00 21.4 C 4 0.10 0.54 47.4 1.8 0.0 1. 00 49.2 1. 00 49.2 D 4 0.31 0.88 35.7 5.7 0.0 1. 00 41.4 1. 00 41. 4 D 19 **** 0.31 1. 03 37.8 32.8 0.0 1. 00 70.6 1. 00 70.6 E 27 Traffix 7.8.0915 0.41 0.60 25.0 0.7 0.0 1. 00 25.7 1. 00 25.7 C 13 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Oct 05 12:01 :43 2007 Page 3-27 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Allernative) Project PM Intersection #7: Wolfe/Stevens Creek Signal=ProtecVRights=lnctude Final Vol: 699- 892 591 Lanes: 10201 -.J4~~~ Signal=Prolect Signal =Prolecl Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude Vol Cnt Date: 1 0/3/2006 Righls=lnc1ude Lanes: Final Vol: j- Cycle Time (see): 110 ~ 710'" 2 0 535'" ~ Loss Time (see): 0 .t- O 1153 3 -.. Critical V/C: 1.043 +- 2 896 0 r Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 82.2 T 0 169 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 51.8 2 181 LOS: D ~ ~ t .,. r+ Lanes: 1 0 2 0 Final Vol: 144'" 441 57 Signal=ProtecVRights=lnclude Street Name: Wolfe Road Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------11--------------- 11_______________11_______________1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 3 Oct 2006 << PM Peak Base Vol: 144 441 57 583 892 691 703 1153 169 181 896 528 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 144 441 57 583 892 691 703 1153 169 181 896 528 Added Vol: 0 0 0 8 0 8 7 0 0 0 0 7 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 144 441 57 591 892 699 710 1153 169 181 896 535 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 144 441 57 591 892 699 710 1153 169 181 896 535 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 144 441 57 591 892 699 710 1153 169 181 896 535 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 144 441 57 591 892 699 710 1153 169 181 896 535 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.86 0.86 Lanes: 1.00 2.66 0.34 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 4515 584 1805 3610 1615 3502 5187 1615 3502 3264 1632 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.33 0.25 0.43 0.20 0.22 0.10 0.05 0.27 0.33 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.08 0.11 Volume/Cap: 1.04 0.87 Uniform Del: 50.8 48.0 IncremntDel: 88.5 13.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 139.3 60.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 139.3 60.9 LOS by Move: F E HCM2kAvgQ: 9 9 0.11 0.87 48.0 13.0 0.0 1. 00 60.9 1. 00 60.9 E 9 0.38 0.87 31. 6 11.2 0.0 1. 00 42.8 1. 00 42.8 D 21 0.41 0.60 25.0 0.7 0.0 1. 00 25.7 1. 00 25.7 C 13 0.41 1. 04 32.2 46.5 0.0 1. 00 78.7 1. 00 78.7 E 33 **** **** 0.19 1. 04 44.3 46.3 0.0 1. 00 90.6 1. 00 90.6 F 19 0.41 0.54 24.4 0.3 0.0 1. 00 24.7 1. 00 24.7 C 11 0.41 0.25 21.2 0.2 0.0 1. 00 21.4 1. 00 21.4 C 4 0.10 0.54 47.4 1.7 0.0 1. 00 49.2 1. 00 49.2 D 4 0.31 0.87 35.7 5.5 0.0 1. 00 41.2 1. 00 41.2 D 19 **** 0.31 1. 04 37.7 36.4 0.0 1. 00 74.1 1. 00 74.1 E 28 Traffix 7.8.0915 Copyrighl (c) 2005 Dowling ASSOCiates. Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose COMPARE Fri Ocl 0512:01:43 2007 Page 3.28 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operafions (Future Volume Alternative) Future Growth PM Intersection #7: Wolfe/Stevens Creek Signal=ProlecVRighls=include Final Vol: 713- 922 S02 Lanes: 10 2 01 -.J4+~~ Signal=Protecl Signal=Protecl Final Vol: Lanes: Righ!s=lnclude Vol Cn! Date: nfa Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol: J- Cycle Time (see): 110 ~ 72S'" 2 0 545'" ~ Loss Time (see): 0 ~ 0 1192 3 ----... Critical VlC: 1.0S5 ...- 2 925 0 =r Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 89.4 1= 0 175 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 54.8 2 187 LOS: D ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lanes: 1 0 2 0 Final Vol: 149*" 455 59 Signal=Pro!eCVRights=lnclude Street Name: Wolfe Road Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movemen t : L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1--------------- t 1---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 149 455 59 602 922 713 726 1192 175 187 925 545 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 149 455 59 602 922 713 726 1192 175 187 925 545 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 149 455 59 602 922 713 726 1192 175 187 925 545 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 149 455 59 602 922 713 726 1192 175 187 925 545 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 149 455 59 602 922 713 726 1192 175 187 925 545 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 149 455 59 602 922 713 726 1192 175 187 925 545 ____________1_______________11_______________11 _______________11_______________ 1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.86 0.86 Lanes: 1.00 2.66 0.34 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 4514 585 1805 3610 1615 3502 5187 1615 3502 3264 1632 ------------1---------------11---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.33 0.26 0.44 0.21 0.23 0.11 0.05 0.28 0.33 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.08 Volume/Cap: 1.07 Uniform Del: 50.7 IncremntDel: 94.6 InitQueuDel: 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 Delay/Veh: 145.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 145.3 LOS by Move: F HCM2kAvgQ: 9 0.11 0.88 48.0 14.8 0.0 1. 00 62.8 1. 00 62.8 E 9 0.11 0.88 48.0 14.8 0.0 1. 00 62.8 1. 00 62.8 E 9 0.38 0.88 32.0 13 .0 0.0 1. 00 44.9 1. 00 44.9 D 22 0.41 1. 07 32.2 53.5 0.0 1. 00 85.7 1. 00 85.7 F 34 **** **** 0.19 1. 07 44.3 53.2 0.0 1. 00 97.5 1. 00 97.5 F 20 0.41 0.56 24.7 0.3 0.0 1. 00 25.0 1. 00 25.0 C 11 0.41 0.26 21.3 0.2 0.0 1. 00 21.5 1. 00 21.5 C 4 0.10 0.56 47.5 2.1 0.0 1. 00 49.6 1. 00 49.6 D 4 0.31 0.90 36.2 7.5 0.0 1. 00 43.7 1. 00 43.7 D 20 **** 0.31 1. 07 37.8 43.7 0.0 1. 00 81. 4 1. 00 81. 4 F 30 Traffix 7.8.0915 0.41 0.62 25.3 0.8 0.0 1. 00 26.1 1. 00 26.1 C 13 Copyright (c) 2005 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans. San Jose Agpendix C Approved Trips Development Land Use TolDl I. WIlIl\:,';1 V"llc,' 1'llrl..wn.\'I\'llk., Ro:siu,'nlilllllll Condo ~ Condo RCl<Iil Condo Rclail Tolal Retail '!.j\'.II..^n:nlIl'I'I!.IlI1..1I.2IlUI(lt1kPllr\.:vn~'l-oo:l J.:WI:RSln..uIII'l\:o:k 11!\'u (,'J.>l-.:TO:Ir..~o:l ~. 1.17S:;.I>..:.~n...IIlYu ("'IM('MII1!o:I1lItI) -rJ'.;- J J.:/ ~. 1'}77tlSI(\'VtI~('n.'\'k IlivLl (MnrkO:II'IIlC..lllJj.: (.J TOlal P.M. Poek Hour ~ Rale 204 d.lI. 46 duo 5.66 270 0.44 3 17 23 duo 6.72 155 051 2 10 2.400s.r. 41.94 103 1.0.\ 1 1 6d.u. 1.825 s.r. 100.000 s.r. 296.000 s.r. n.ooos.r. 3500 !lcal.!: 7.000 studcnt~ 68.000g.s.r 14.652..r. 60,000 5. r. gross 1.774 s.( IOU60s.r. ncl 55 d.u. 8d.u. 10.582,.r. I J7 unils 19 d.u. nct 14:1 roolT6 20.ooo5.r. 10.000s.r. 19.000 s.r. 65 20 12 2 '2 16 8 24 9 5 14 4 5 9 0..52 0.62 3.75 41.94 4 n 121 I.b' ...\,..} r,. I Ie ,'";.'lllllnl.~ R"o.lri~u"li An:,ll'ivir:: I'nrJ;XII J4.300(;.5.r. ( 19.000 s. r. lIet) 1~13S5.A. '({i. 107 d.u. 6.4005.( 7. HI"'''''lI~ .n....k So: Wl1l1t: II,:""" (:\fo;l1~' liljuilK."':L1 Mh:cd Usc Condos Relail Tolal Retail Rctail Rcslauranl Theater TOlal JJ.Collcgc Relail Rl'Stauranl Office RClail Wurchouse S.F. housa S,F. houses ~. W.,IIi.: s: V.llc" 1'.rkll'llY t~k:~ ,.(',.'...."'1 l'1"1....XII 'J, ""_11'0: & V"l1o;" 1'.rkwllY (VlItk,.I(.'\("IIIl!li..n)1 I) 1\1. SI~.V"'hLI'I'\...k IItHI. ...r. Sl..mn~ (Do: ,\nm f'"Ih:~o; J:.'\l'l11IISj"nl12) I'. \l1..,,,-, 1\....J.~I.ll I:!. Slo:\'o:,'~l'n....k& 1"'I1nll)r {('hUll" kl'hl"!le><~l tJ. MlU;..ni^~..'\!KI~^"Wl (AnrMlnOn){MI 1~.;!2_I!>l'.~::!II"n"''1lI(.uJ{d.(llnrrin~ldnl-+Oh ._.}_~/ I~. ::!II~(.~ V.t....ych\'\'1l I Jriu: (l>llblk.l\I''\TIIIl'''' If.. (IIU ,\110.11:. '\I'..nw lI{i.IIWn.'l: l{o;lil.>f1 T~'IT1ICO:lI) 17. ;117 E 1t..."..lIlt'lIJ IhJ (rllln.'il FI'I,",:..lin TO;TllIO:'''~) PE.NDING lUIIIO"'. Tlll1lnuAI\.'UH: Retail ApanmcnlS S.F. Houses 11011:1 Rclall Mt'ctinS Rms Total Rclail :!llKtlllllll.U.........IIJ. IW~1I7 /';. SI...UiulillVillll ~n'n}l(oj 111!'CS_~i'I.SldUUf:lhl. tl"I1'ylill}'jl7l -\'\J1)-tt1A l )~b Sh"Nliflll ( 'O:III''TI:'l",ll:nll f"n:.:kl:tllll~l l~i\tl"IIII\J.iII,'llilli=-l."rl{u lillSullJ,'~.n'Jl Notes: Trip gener:.llion average ratcs rrom lTE's 1'rip (j('I/{'nl/irlll. 7''' Edilioll. (I) Peak hour trip generation provided by CilY orCupcrlino (2) Trip gcncration rrom DKS,Oe An1.a College E:.IR (May 2002) ()) Trip generation pro\.idcd by City ofCupcnino (Whole Foods TIA) (4) Trip generation rates Crom I'm ~Iigh Tumcwcr Sil 00\\11 Restaurant (932). (5) Trip generation rales rrom ITE Quality Rrsl:IUr<1l11 (93 I). (6) Trip gl.'ll.cralion tales rram Fchr & Peers. TIA (May 2007) (7) Trip generation rales rram Fchr & Peers. TIA (April 2007) (S) Trip generation r:ues rrolll Piing Enginccrs. TIA (June 2006) (9) Trip generation HUCS from Fellr & PeefS. TIA (Feu 2007) (IOJ Trip generation rates from Republic ITS (still tlran). U8.') 20 13 J.75 58 6J 1.093 1.~4 10.7'0 0.14 892 88 980 0.16 728 292 1.120 42.94 2.920 25 32 57 179 149 328 111.15 1.863 98 62 Ilia 11.01 661 1.55 '2 II 93 1.49 15 74 89 9.57 9:57 526 77 0.75 0.75 10 1 31 5' 41 6 1.01 1.01 35 .I 21 J 56 , 7.3 H--i 53 .,,~s \1 ~o 't.[) 29 ..1<:. 82 854 O.~2 I 27 1::;\h'itl:r;'U;i~ ~4~;:;;iH :j~~t~~: ,,'1' !.'-' ':JI "\"., ,. -:_1. "PJ .,......~I,. .~.,.",. h..J ,\~1~;D: t':I~:~X ~t~:I\'~_: .if;f~i~ - 2.107 - 77 1437 49 61 ~ '-' ~ .. /.:, .~ ~ -~ -,'~~~v .. #~ ~ Exhibit B Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. ESTABLISHED 1931 GRADUATE FORESTER CERTIFIED ARBORISTS STATE CONTRACTOR"S LICENSE NO. 276793 PEST CONTROL ADVISORS AND OPERATORS RICHARD L. HUNTINGTON PRESIDENT KEVIN R. KIELTY OPERATIONS MANAGER September 20,2006 535 BRAGATO ROAD, STE. A SAN CARLOS, CA 94070-6228 TELEPHONE: (650) 593-4400 FACSIMILE (650) 593-4443 EMAIL: info@maynetree.com Mr. William Brown Kimco Realty Corp. 4055 Factoria Mall SE Bellevue, WA 98066 Dear Mr. Brown, RE: CUPERTINO VILLAGE This report is essentially an addendum to the tree survey report of August 25,2006. The original report did not include any proposed development/construction or tree removal for development or construction. I have now received a scope of development opportunity locations. Each of the three areas will be addressed along with a synopsis of trees on the smaller sites, in light of removal and potential development. Area I is between Building D and the English Pub. The only trees within this area are numbers 1, 58, 59, 60, 61, and 62. All of these trees have a 60 percent or less rating or fair condition. All are, or will be, causing damage with roots uplifting nearby curbs or paving. Also, there will always be risks to pedestrians and parked cars from limb drop. Mitigating these will result in support loss or a program of pruning every 2 years. The trees along Wolfe Road have roots under the parking lot. Therefore, any excavation will impact tree health and/or support. These are trees numbered 38, 63, 65, 68, 70, and 72. These trees will require a minimum of 10 feet of open space free of excavation to give them a reasonable level of acceptable risk. Protective fencing can be installed along the curb if paving is kept. Fencing can be placed further if paving is removed to reduce soil compaction and keep excavation away from root zone Cupertino Village - 2 - September 20, 2006 Area II is in the northwest corner and again is all parking area. There are 19 trees numbered 165 and 181 - 198 within the site plus 20 perimeter trees numbered, 157- 164 and 166 - 177. All of the inside trees have a condition rating in the fair range, 50 - 69, or less. Trees numbered 196 and 198 have a higher fair percent of 65 percent. Paving surrounds all trees so they have a very high chance of uplifting paving and curbs as was stated for most trees. They also have a high risk of falling limbs onto cars and tripping hazards for pedestrians. The perimeter trees on the northerly side can stay except numbers 160 & 161. Both trees are about 3 feet from the curb with many roots below the paving. It is prudent to remove both trees due to sap on cars and limited life spans. Excavation along the curb would impact roots and removal would be recommended. Install protective fencing along the curb. The trees along the westerly side, numbers 164 - 177 are mostly ginkgos. Number 168 is a hawthorn that has poor form. All of the other trees are small and about 3 feet from the curb. Excavation would cause only minor impacts. I do recommend deep root fertilizing. Install protective fencing along the curb. Area III is very small with only 5 or 6 trees. The 2 locusts, numbers 149 and 150, have ample room to grow, but are potentially in the footprint of any construction. Tree number 151, a ginkgo, has a nuisance fruit issue and should be removed regardless of any proposed work. Tree number 152 is a Monterey pine, which is heavily infected with Sequoia pitch moth larval activity and also is in potential construction footprint. Tree number 152 has roots uplifting the curb and below the paving. Excavation along the curb would cause damage. If tree is retained it will need at least a 10 foot distance from any construction. Deep root fertilizing will help offset potential impacts. It, however, is prudent to remove the pines due to a variety of health issues, are short- lived, insect prone, easily stressed. Photographs are included to give a visual picture of each site. Individual trees were not photographed but all are in the fair condition range or below. There are no high-value trees in the three sites discussed in this report. Sincerely, . -pvJ./ f/)/ &~L;/ RLH:pmd Richard L. Huntington Certified Arborist WE #0119A Certified Forester # 1925 Cupertino Village - 3 - September 20, 2006 t~!F ~~.~.r . ~/. .~.{- I ~ 7~ ,.. ., fJ ~~~7"'" ~"fj , ~. '",. '. ': ~. ,'O:~ .~ ~ 15 1:56PM AREA I - Looking north Tree on right is # 58. Cupertino Village - 4 - September 20, 2006 T. ~-- - ", , ' ~,,'.""O'" :.I 15. , I . >.:< :~~'0~~~:~J; ! . ..1~~~tjf~J; ".,~ " ., '''~;'>~~;~';';?~f~{ , AREA II - Looking northwest Tree in front is # 187. Cupertino Village - 5 - September 20, 2006 -r ., . ~ : .' --=-..:..-...- . ~ ~--- ---....,~- .~7.' '=- r - -~- ~";;:;,, r -- 15 2:01PM I -- - - -- AREA II - Looking west Tree in front is #181. Cupertino Village - 6 - September 20, 2006 ~ 1~ 2.03PM AREA III - Looking east Tree on right is #152. Tree centered in back is #149. 'k " ~,. J - ___~ ~_____~n--__b.....- ~ ~ N u; gfR m [:.:,,~ t~ ~. ~ _ __~ ~,_ ....1::.._....._'"-..-:.~~h. ~ ~ -. ~~_.-..r. co. I/) 'It c") 1/). to 1/). I/) ...~.~.,.... :r-~' ,,~,'~~~'" --- ~~ ,. $r;, /' -- , _'t... '~~""- '~<"~'- /' MAP KEY, TREE COUNTJ SPECIES .- (92) ASH TREES X- (12) REDWOOD TREES ~,. (8)'PJNE TREES T - (3) TULIP TREES L. (12) LOCUST TREES p~ (1) PEAR TREE G- (7) GlNKO TREES A- (2) ALDER TREES 0- (2) LOOUATTREBS ~ , I ~' ' . . ", "- '. t ;~~~.:; -~"", . -- _..............~ r,--' - ",: ,,~,- . ,.,-! " .! - I .- ~ l . . . . I " ' . ._,; '. .i : 1 "" ._ ~_. ". I, ;.1 _ . ---.l- .... . r ..t" _..1 '.J "- f --.,' I.:' ~ .-:_ .... . h. ~- l~' "./ - ",.^~ . - ...1-' <> n .". "" ' ",~I>V: C . " ' ".1 l '.'~-=-' . .' J ll\ , _ ',_ ,_ ; 1.1 "l I, , ~ It) -=--t !'!< .... . . , " ~ . ""':.E~ ~~ '1.:-. .~ 1i.. !''': r..'~J ,1" .'-.- " .. .. . ~: :. .', n -.' . ,," lil 1; i: , '., .. ......... .' '<"" =- '" ~-'." . . ,,':<:,;<,;. J I i n ,cr"'I'--::"';!,.;'.c: 0 ..'';,;; ,lIfl06 , #~ ~., ,0> l'.w.... ,,= 1."- _T:"'.',;i'!!,J -;. " . ,.. .___ _' .<< . ' '" ; . '" .J" .Lt' <"I.'" .>'';'' .. ...., "... .. .... ..... ........ ". ... .... --.,;;"'" > "'" '" co co co _ ..., S1 .0>: O~A'~ .~..~... " ' .;. --+ (j:7/r.... ... VJ _ .0;) o>,m(i)'" ." I/) co fo- 0>' .-:- ..."". 0> en GI 01 0> 0> <':'" c") 0'- 0 ,.... '\"" ,. -..--- ... '~~f~Y"~1=;~":)-. . .rr::.~~ ~ ::..~=_____ Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Road and Homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. REPORT ON 203 trees at Cupertino Village Wolfe Road and Homestead, Cupertino, California Prepared For: Kimco Realty Corporation 4055 Factoria Mall SE Bellevue, Washington 98066 Contact: William Brown Telephone: (425) 041-9716 Prepared By: Mayne Tree Expert Company, Incorporated 535 Bragato Road, Suite A Contact: Richard Huntington Telephone: (650) 593-4400 Facsimile: (650) 593-4443 August 25, 2006 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe "oad and Homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Pace No. SITE: 1 ASSIGNMENT: 1 METHODOLOGY: 1 TREE SURVEY: 2 -13 FINDINGS: 14 Report on Cupertino village, Wolfe Koad and Homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. SITE: The site is a shopping center, mostly covered with paving, walkways and structures. There is a lot of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, so uneven surfaces are a problem. There are 203 trees on the site, most of which are in planting strips, peninsulas or islands. The majority do not have adequate room for root growth or canopy spread. The trees are along the streets, Wolfe Road and Homestead (major thoroughfares), parking stalls or sidewalks. The only exception is the area where there are redwoods and alders. Tree species and sizes vary from large ashes, redwoods and pines to small, recently planted plums, Chinese pistaches and crape myrtles. The trees also vary in the amount of care and inspections they have had and in their longevity. The redwoods are long lived and require very little care. The pines are relatively short lived and require little care, but do need to be inspected for insects and disease. The ash trees need lots of care and inspections, due to their inherently weak structures. ASSIGNMENT: Each tree was to be identified as to species and then measured, as all trees on this site are significant. The trees were to be given numbers, which coordinate on the Report and the Site Plan. Each tree was to be inspected for general health and structure. This is to include the presence of insects and diseases, longevity and hazardous conditions. Mitigating Measures will be included, but not Tree Protection. METHODOLOGY: The trees were measured at 54 inches above grade; trees with multiple trunks were measured separately. Smaller, multiple-trunked trees were measured at the base and so noted. Small trees under 4 feet tall are not included in this report, nor were the oleander trees. Trees along the north fence are included, as are the trees along the west parking area by the apartments. Each tree was affixed with a one inch round metal, sequentially numbered tag which was attached about 6 feet high on the northerly side, if possible. Trees on the northerly side were tagged on the southerly side. The inspection process included insect and disease presence or the trees' inherent susceptibility to these pests. Trunk orientation is also included, as is branch structure, past failures, past care, root pruning for sidewalk repair, foliar density and/or color, seasonal shoot growth, trunk damage, growing space and potential problems with roots and/or fruit. Page 1 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe r<.oad and Homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. The Condition rating takes into account and notes them as a percentage as compared to a perfect tree, using the following scale: 1 - 30 - 50 - 70 - 90 - 29 Very Poor 49 Poor 69 Fair 89 Good 100 Excellent The final section (entitled "Comments'') gives information to help explain the condition rating and recommendations to help offset health and/or structural conditions. This includes irrigation, fertilization, pruning, spraying or removal. Photographs were taken to depict the diverse growing area on this site. They show the unique ambiance of the arching effect along Wolfe Road and the bareness in the parking lots. They also show the areas of potential hazard to cars, both on the streets and in the parking lots. In addition, they show the pedestrian hazards from root damage to the sidewalks and curbs. Also, heavy limbs could fall on cars or pedestrians. TREE SURVEY Tree No. Soecies DBH Condition Comments (Inches) (Percent) 1 Monterey pine 26.7 50 Tree has been topped and leans. Limbs are heavy and it has very weak structure. Tree is also uplifting curb. 2 Ash tree 29.2 35 Forks at 10', with included bark and no center top. Significant decay at crotch. Weak structure and is uplifting curb. Removal is recommended. 3 Ash tree 14.2 60 Minor dieback. 4 Ash tree 13.7 50 Slight lean and has included bark. Tree is sunburned due summer or late spring pruning. 5 Ash tree 21.2 55 Weak structure and included bark. Tree is uplifting curb. 6 Ash tree 22.7 55 Tree is uplifting curb and has included bark. 7 Ash tree 11.3 55 Uplifting curb. Lighten. Page 2 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Road and Homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. Tree No. Soecies 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 TREE SURVEY DBH Condition Comments (Inches) (Percent) Ash tree 13.3 Ash tree 11.1 Ash tree 19.4 Ash tree 15.1 Ash tree 14.7 Ash tree 20.4 Ash tree 23.1 Ash tree 20.1 Redwood 22.6 Redwood 24.9 Redwood 27.7 Ash tree 20.1 Redwood 25.5 Redwood 24.5 Redwood 19.9 Ash tree 19.6 Ash tree 18.9 Ash tree 26.4 Ash tree 17.5 60 65 60 50 50 45 50 55 80 80 80 50 80 80 70 55 40 55 40 Tree uplifting curb and has decayed crotch. Lighten and clear light, Clear light. Minor weak structure and bark damage. Included bark. Tree is next to several utilities. Lighten. Included bark and thin foliage. Prudent to remove. Many tops, with included bark. Tree has surface roots and lawnmower damage. Thin by Y4. Next to the flag pole. Thin by Y4. Thin by Y4. All growth on south side. Next to flagpole. Thin by Y4. Roots are uplifting driveway. Thin by Y4. Twist in trunk. Thin by Y4. Potential risk to street. All growth on west side, recommend removal. Broken limb resting on Tree No. 24. Tree has included bark and is girdled by rope. Roots cut to repair walk. All growth to west. Recommend removal. Page 3 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Road and homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. TREE SURVEY Tree No. Soecies DBH Condition Comments (Inches) (Percent) 27 Ash tree 24.3 45 Tree is risk to street, with most growth on south side. Included bark. Removal is recommended. 28 Ash tree 24.3 45 All growth at top, clear No. 27, if tree is kept. 29 Ash tree 19.1 40 All growth on street side next to hydrant. Removal recommended. 30 Ash tree 27.7 50 All growth at top, tree is uplifting concrete and past sidewalk repair. Clear the redwood. 31 Ash tree 26.2 50 All growth on street side. Lighten. 32 Ash tree 8.9 35 Suppressed by other trees. Removal recommended. 33 Ash tree 36.9 50 Is uplifting sidewalk. Weak structure, lighten street side. 34 Ash tree 29.2 55 All growth on west and north sides, has included bark. Thin. 35 Ash tree 24.1 45 All growth on street side, uplifting sidewalk. Lighten. 36 Ash tree 25.6 60 Tree has included bark, thin. 37 Ash tree 24.7 50 Uplifting sidewalk, lighten over street. 38 Ash tree 31.3 60 Tree has had roots cut for sidewalk repair, lighten. 39 Redwood 31.3 80 Too close to building. 40 Alder 15.8 40 All growth on one side, lighten. Prudent to remove. 41 Alder 21.1 45 All growth on one side, lighten. Prudent to remove. 42 Redwood 30.2 80 Thin by 114. 43 Redwood 23.5 80 Thin by 114. 44 Redwood 23.1 70 Most growth on north side, thin by 114. Page 4 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Road and homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. Tree No. Species 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 TREE SURVEY DBH Condition Comments (Inches) (Percent) Redwood 24.8 Redwood 31.2 Locust 7.7 Locust 6.7 Locust 7.9 Locust 7.0 Locust 6.9 Locust 8.0 Loquat 12.4 Redwood 33.5 Ginkgo 11.4 Ginkgo 7.3 Ginkgo 6.1 Monterey pine 14.8 Ash 19.0 Ash 20.6 Ash 26.7 Ash 22.1 Ash 21.6 Ash 29.0 80 80 60 40 55 60 35 45 60 70 65 50 70 40 60 55 50 50 50 55 Thin by V4. Thin by V4. TOp dieback, clear roof. Top dieback, bark damage. Recommend removal. TOp dieback, growing over bricks. Top dieback. Significant trunk decay and top dieback. Recom- mend removal. Bark damage, tree is stressed. Prudent to remove. Lower trunk wound. Pushing over retaining wall and uplifting sidewalk. Tree has included bark. Remove secondary top. Tree leans and is suppressed. Cut back Tree No. 1 for clearance. Significant trunk oozing. Removal recommended. Tree is in peninsula. Uplifting curb, lighten. Damage to curb, crotch decay. Slight lean and included bark. Causing curb damage, most growth on west. Included bark, uplifting sidewalk. Lighten. Page 5 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Road and homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. TREE SURVEY Tree No. Species DBH Condition Comments (Inches) (Percent) 65 Ash 22.3 45 Basal cavity, decay on west side and included bark. Install cable. 66 Ash 18.4 55 Keep thin. 67 Ash 31.2 35 Past root cutting for sidewalk repair. Intermittent dieback in canopy and included bark. Prudent to remove. 68 Ash 18.2 60 Keep light over parking. 69 Ash 20.1 50 All growth on west side, included bark. 70 Ash 27.1 50 All growth on north side. Has had past root cutting for curb and sidewalk repair. Lighten. 71 Ash 27.8 50 Tree is next to utilities, with all growth on west side. Lighten over street. 72 Ash 29.9 45 Sidewalk, curb and utility damage. Cavity at cuts. Lighten over parking. 73 Ash 35.0 45 Tree next to utility, bark damage. Has had root cutting to repair sidewalk. Install cable on south- east limb. 74 Chinese pistache 4.0 70 Newly planted, keep thin. 75 Chinese pistache 3.5 70 Newly planted, keep thin. 76 Chinese pistache 3.4 60 Deformed. 77 Ash 26.4 55 Weak structure, lighten over street. 78 Ash 35.5 45 Significant included bark, keep thin. 79 Ash 25.1 50 Root damage, weak structure. 80 Ash 27.6 50 Included bark, broken limbs. Keep lightened over parking. Page 6 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Road and Homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. TREE SURVEY Tree No. Soecies DBH Condition Comments (Inches) (Percent) 81 Chinese pistache 3.0 70 New tree 82 Ash 23.8 65 Root cutting for walkway repairs, recently pruned. 83 Ash 18.9 60 All growth on south and west sides, broken limb over street. Lighten. 84 Ash 21.2 55 Stressed, lighten over parking. 85 Ash 19.2 60 Has had root cutting for sidewalk repair. 86 Ash 19.2 60 Included bark and is uplifting sidewalk. Lighten over parking. 87 Ash 17.4 60 Recently pruned. 88 Ash 18.6 55 Appears overly pruned. 89 Ash 18.2 60 Thin in 2 years. 90 Ash 15.9 60 Recent root cutting for sidewalk repair. 91 Ash 7.2 50 Leans over street. 92 Ash 20.0 50 Tree has included bark. Install a cable. 93 Ash 24.9 50 Most growth on west side, has included bark. Lighten over parking. 94 Ash 18.5 50 Uplifting sidewalk. 95 Ash 25.7 55 Uplifting sidewalk and has included bark. Lighten over parking. 96 Ash 34.6 60 Next to utility and has included bark. Lighten and cable. 97 Ash 35.1 55 Uplifting sidewalk and has included bark. Lighten and cable. Page 7 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Road and homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. TREE SURVEY Tree No. Soecies DBH Condition Comments (Inches) (Percent) 98 Ash 4.1 55 Newly planted, has included bark. 99 Ash 21.1 50 Significant visible root plate. Lighten. 100 Ash 33.4 55 Significant visible root plate and significant curb damage. Lighten. 101 Ash 4.5 45 Newly planted, deformed. 102 Crape myrtle 2.5 70 Newly planted. 103 Crape myrtle 2.4 70 Newly planted. 104 Crape myrtle 3.0 70 Newly planted. 105 Crape myrtle 2.0 70 Newly planted. 106 Ash 4.4 60 Newly planted. Too many tops. 107 Ash 36.4 65 In 4' wide island, pushing out curb, utility at base. Has included bark. Lighten. 108 Ash 4.0 65 Newly planted, growing over parking. 109 Ash 20.7 50 In 4' wide planter, has bark loss, limb girdled by cable and tip dieback. 110 Ash 2.9 45 New tree, has tip dieback. 111 Ash 27.5 55 In 4' wide planter, has weak upper structure. Lighten over street and parking. 112 Chinese pistache 3.2 75 New tree. 113 Chinese pistache 2.6 75 New tree. 114 Ash 24.4 60 Recently pruned. 115 Ash 27.8 60 Recently pruned. Page 8 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Road and Homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. TREE SURVEY Tree No. Species DBH Condition Comments (Inches) (Percent) 116 Ash 34.7 50 Significant root cutting on east side for sidewalk repair. Lighten west side. 117 Ginkgo 7.1 50 Leans west, has tip dieback. 118 Ginkgo 3.0 70 New tree. 119 Ginkgo 8.5 70 Wind swept. 120 Ginkgo 7.1 60 Slight lower basal wound. 121 Ginkgo 11.0 40 Slight lower basal wound. 122 Ginkgo 11.2 70 Fruit developing is a significant nuisance. 123 Ginkgo 6.1 60 Basal wound. 124 Monterey pine 17.6 65 Surface roots, weak upper structure. Possibly has pine pitch canker. 125 Monterey pine 24.7, 15.6 60 Forks at 2 feet, most growth on west side. Trunk is oozing, may be pine pitch canker. Lighten in winter. 126 Crab apple 4.1 75 Has ample room to grow. 127 Crab apple 2.9 70 Has ample room to grow. 128 Nectari ne 1. 5 Est. 60 Newly planted, recently leafed out. Has peach leaf curl. 129 Nectarine 1. 5 Est. 60 Newly planted, has peach leaf curl. 130 Plum 1.5 Est. 65 Newly planted. 131 Plum 3.3 60 Leans. 132 Plum 5.1 65 Leans, curb damage. 133 Chinese pistache 5.3 75 Ample room to grow. Page 9 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Road and Homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. TREE SURVEY Tree No. Soecies DBH Condition Comments (Inches) (Percent) 134 Chinese pistache 5.1 75 Ample room to grow. 135 Crape myrtle 5.1 75 Utility box near tree. 136 Crape myrtle 2.0 Est. 75 Utility box near tree. 137 Crape myrtle 1. 5 Est. 70 Broken limb. 138 Crape myrtle 1. 5 Est. 75 Ample room to grow. 139 Crape myrtle 3.0 Est. 75 Ample room to grow. 140 Fan palm 8.0 Est. 80 Thorns are risk to public. 141 Japanese maple Multi 70 Trimmed to a ball. 142 Japanese maple Multi 70 Trimmed to a ball. 143 Japanese maple 7.0,5.8,5.5 55 Has included bark, split-off limb and sunburn. 144 Japanese maple 3.4,4.2,3.5 65 Leaning, has included bark. 145 Plum 4.3 65 Slight lean. 146 Plum 4.0 65 Most growth on south side. 147 Tulip tree 17.0 70 Uplifting bricks on north and west side. 148 Plum 6.0 65 Slight lean, included bark. 149 Locust 5.3 65 Ample growing room. Thin. 150 Locust 5.2 65 Ample growing room. Thin. 151 Ginkgo 5.7 50 Nuisance fruit, trunk decay. 152 Monterey pine 15.1 50 Significant Sequoia pitch moth infestation. Tree has slight lean. 153 Monterey pine 14.6 60 Pushing curb. Page 10 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Road and h\Jmestead Prepared for l<imco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. TREE SURVEY Tree No. Soecies DBH Condition Comments (Inches) (Percent) 154 Monterey pine 17.2, 19.2 55 Forks at 3 feet, pushing curb. Sequoia pitch moth. 155 Locust 5.2 65 4 feet from curb. 156 Locust 4.6 65 4 feet from curb. 157 Locust 5.1 65 4 feet from curb. 158 Locust 4.2 65 4 feet from curb. 159 Locust 5.8 60 4 feet from curb, broken limb. 160 Monterey pine 17.6 65 Lighten over parking and driveway. Dropping pitch on cars. 161 Monterey pine 24.5 55 Forks at 6 feet with most growth on west side. 162 Locust 5.3 65 4 feet from curb. 163 Locust 5.2 60 Irrigate. 164 Redwood 8.1 80 Irrigate. 165 Hawthorn 6.0 50 Leans and is stressed. 166 Ginkgo 4.7 60 Poor form, leans. 167 Ginkgo 3.7 50 Significant trunk decay. 168 Ginkgo 7.0 65 Multiple tops. 169 Ginkgo 5.3 65 Two tops. 170 Ginkgo 6.5 60 Leans, has been topped. 171 Ginkgo 5.2 60 Leans, has been topped. 172 Ginkgo 7.0 60 Leans, has been topped. Page 11 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Road and Homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. TREE SURVEY Tree No. Soecies DBH Condition Comments (Inches) (Percent) 173 Ginkgo 5.8 55 Leans, poor form 174 Ginkgo 7.0 65 Has 3 tops. 175 Ginkgo 7.5 70 Leans. 176 Ginkgo 6.2 60 Leans, has weak form. 177 Ginkgo 6.0 70 Irrigate. 178 Tulip tree 25.1 70 Uplifting bricks, poSSible aphis problem. Ughten for safety in winter. 179 Tulip tree 20.3 65 3 tops with included bark, lawnmower damage. Thin and cable in winter. Possible aphis problem. 180 Evergreen pear 7.1 50 Cracking bricks, has significant leaf spot. Growing around support pipes. Prudent to remove. 181 Ash 25.2 50 Recently pruned, uplifting curb. Has girdling root and significant included bark. Install cable. 182 Ash 22.4 60 Recently pruned, uplifting curb. Has trunk wound with decay. 183 Ash 25.1 60 Recently pruned, uplifting curb. Surrounded by paving, has included bark. 184 Ash 22.6 55 Surrounded by paving, uplifting curb. Canopy all sprouts. 185 Ash 16.6 60 Surrounded by paving, recently pruned. 186 Locust 4.4 50 Planted too deep, roots exposed. Has included bark. 187 Locust 4.7 50 Planted too deep, roots exposed. Has included bark. Near sewer meter. 188 Ash 24.6 50 Surrounded by paving, uplifting curb. Recently pruned, has included bark and girdling roots. Page 12 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Road and Homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. TREE SURVEY Tree No. Soecies DBH Condition Comments (Inches) (Percent) 189 Ash 19.2 50 Surrounded by paving, uplifting curb. Recently pruned, has included bark and canopy is all sprouts. 190 Ash 14.7 45 Surrounded by paving, significantly stressed, very thin canopy. Prudent to remove. 191 Ash 23.8 30 Surrounded by paving. Tops stubbed off, with many small sprouts. Significant dieback. Recently pruned. Removal recommended. 192 Ash 23.6 50 Recently pruned, surrounded by paving. Girdling roots and included bark. 193 Ash 23.9 60 Newly pruned, surrounded by paving, pushing curb. 194 Ash 18.5 60 Recently pruned, surrounded by paving. Root growing around sprinkler. 195 Ash 16.7 60 Recently pruned, 3 feet from curb. 196 Ash 19.1 65 Recently pruned, 3 feet from curb. 197 Ash 14.0 40 Leans, with all growth over road. 4 feet from curb and has included bark. Prudent to remove. 198 Ash 24.3 65 Uplifting curb, 4 trunks at 10'. Thin. 199 Loquat 6.6 40 Leans, tip dieback. Recommend removal. 200 Loquat 4.7 @ 12' 60 Leans. 201 Loquat 6.5 @ 4' 60 Leans, has basal wound. 202 Magnolia 8.4 70 Uplifting curb, minor dieback, limited room. 203 Magnolia 7.2 40 Major limb cut, limited room. Page 13 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe koad and Homestead Prepared for Kimco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. FINDINGS: The majority of larger trees are in areas that are too small for adequate root growth. There is limited water, nutrients and space. Most of these trees have roots that have, or are causing damage to surrounding hardscape, i.e. sidewalks, curbs and paving. The sidewalk along Wolfe Road has been repaired in several places and this has reqUired root cutting. In other areas the uplifted edges have been temporarily ground down level to adjacent hardscape. Mitigating these areas is not possible or prudent without signi-ficant changes in pedestrian traffic or parking spaces. The only practical solution is to continue pruning to reduce risks of limb failure, root pruning to keep hardscape uplift minimized and grinding down concrete where possible. These processes require routine inspections, or it could be done as an annual inspection. The smaller trees are species that do not grow large and therefore have smaller, less invasive root systems. These are the crape myrtles, Chinese pistache, maples, locusts, plums, crabapples and hawthorns. The only area where trees have room to grow is the redwood grove in the southwest corner. Parts of this area have new curbs, so uplift may occur again. As stated previously, maintaining routine monitoring and pruning is the only way to reduce the chance of this happening to the sidewalks. The other area of concern is the pear tree, No. 180, with its annual leaf spot; I recom- mend replacing it. I also noted the ginkgo that had developing fruit. These two trees should be removed and replaced with non-fruiting types. Any trees recommended for removal should be replaced. There should be a long range planting plan, which would include expanding the growing areas at the same time. Changing the sidewalk surfaces may help; rubber is one option. I think this report is accurate and based on sound arboricultural principles and practices. Sincerely, ..._ ;,G/) () // f/Jl~L::;/,c ,c~ /' Richard L. Huntington Certified Arborist WE #0119A Certified Forester # 1925 RLH:dcr Page 14 Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Koad and Homestead Prepared for Ki mco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. 19 11:03RM Parking lot example with overhanging limbs. Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Koad and Homestead Prepared for Ki mco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. Trees overhanging Wolfe Rd. and sidewalk. Report on Cupertino Village, Wolfe Koad and Homestead Prepared for Ki mco Realty Corporation Prepared by Richard Huntington Mayne Tree Expert Company, Inc. Open space with redwood group. '-'",ii, MAY KEY, TREE COUNT, SPECIES -~ e.. (92) ASH TREES '. X.. (12) REDWOOD TREES Jgi.. (8)'PlNB TREES T - (3) tULIP TREES L.. (12) LOCUST TREES p.. (1) PEAR TREE G- (7) GINKO TREES A- (2) ALDER. TREBS 0- (2) LOQUAT TREES , " -"~ - - . : i,: 1 i.~ '; ~ ~!i! -< ~ ~ :.~ ~ /.... .'::1: /" ....'co. r ~~ b....- ,~ :~...-:;t, _~...i:.. ~ ~-~-, -- .~~-.~ .......-' --i- ('I . i-~-~ "m-t.~Mi."I.~ :&.:g ~, ~ ------ ..------ .----',..- ... ~ ~.... .. .~ . ""~i;' ..- - -'-..- .-........- --.;::::;-:::::::..,-:.....~.~.- . r''-.'.".''. ..~.."~: .......,It.:,.:~.~\ ._.....:)...:..;,;i.....~ _..;'..:' , -. ':: .-....._..~'\...\ 164" .;:.~. ..... . ..' '. ", ...... - ..Z. "..'''''''' '; . 'I" .s:J;'...... ." 'fii'1J11lo - --- - .....~ '. ';2:::~65" "I~" :'~...!'H.;.' ........:.; .' '. .. ..... 15 '/;,.!"!"'" ~ I ~-:,..-.' ........ 166i ;' . . _-;':'1,' :,r ~ . . ;! . '.I:- 195 194 192 ~~j.. . ~ -: l!I ~y.~ .,....-. ~ : . . 167r~i'J+- 1$6'1& IU ~".:193 1-4.A.,/ ....8Pi!Zr]/~, :.../" 52 "~f:;;.., 1 ~~. ...,-.FW I . t : ,," \ r.5<';.~~ ..( ..~# ,r...),y- ." -1:rJ '''i./~ . ~~ i1 ..~),.., -::m J If 168'.. 197/.~," , ,J$.~'-,': ,S)~"'," ':;;''l-. Y..J' ".. r~/~' :<,Z:,j V'I :. \. . I i I Ao,l'., ~i'-" ....:r:,'.' -.'v ~''''/ ,,~t~. V' '. !.! , ~=lh198~)" rf~J~~:m . ?l....;~83. " .:. ~;f0?1~.' 17~/~t.,. "=-\.rs.~?i:l"51"~ -"-, ~.. "': ~, ~'il" ::t. 1711" ~"i" ,".~', s,^.; .... 'v/ ,,~.. '.',,// ,,:- "--. 1-' ", r> ..' ._'. . .)'1:;.;' ';L!'." '\..' -(;\,', 1r/' -....' I ~- - _..t., '<.~ 172' ,12 ft I.... '. '" ~.~ /J '" t .;a-. iP 18g.:~~,.;:l0 . .;;'-(~':' . ':"/51" '2;---. /l3.' / '" :':~;:,: j ~:: 1 (to, 173ifi: ,--Y.',' . >)~'184lY:''':I'i;r ~.!. ,I.."ft " li . i I'I;) 'J 174]tt I~~ '. ....~~:~:.. . ": n I D~ C. ' /A::! I..i ,.~...=-.- '.,. 1- -' .. --- j' I .~ ~ ' ....l1E. . t!'i " '" . . ~ 10- r I. " . J, ~ 17S! ~ ... -.:>~~85 .,:.y~. '. 144f.1)' " . I .....,; '-! t t Q..... 1761.:' 186~'"''''~''''''' .../7 ". -.... 14'l ~43 ;{'. 1d (y ":,,,.g... .... ... '..."1. :c- ~.~..... . ify' -'" .... .!~ . .:'" 0. t .601" A n' r --...~. ~-:- 177;1--- ,'. ,~;~-/' ...~'- 01.;;' / g&..ltl\."1l .- . I~"" .... ;.. ' 4---'; " .... ',>Y " ". ..k .' - ~'}"0 ".r. " I . ---"--'-""~T" . -:~~ ~87~~Y .-..~. ". 14Q?~..../,~ "":'-.EL~! _'- ..\)\"'( .~ "~"hl ~'J4 13 .. I. .".~ . .......139~~ (.;, " - ~t"Jl . =~ ....; I .12 1 9. :65" 4' 3, 2\_ ~~ K l':'"f\ . ..."j1~ ~ '~~"~'''' .--:.;t:- .j,; ,':1',' -A;4:'-'~ II' ~...~ . 1"1 . .r---, " jf'1I P,f1f V / ,103 . -'... ,."... .'1'" J:. ..'JiI~~" ....... " ..." _t_ ."".. 0'" .,,> ..." ,..~', ~ft )-~ . ~J;rL t~'\. ,N ~ f<"""." ..; .r,''- ~ I ...l-Ji" r/.~ ./ '135 ~ ~ 1". ~&'.. ..g- .f.... r110 1:1.'. ~. 1= ' ........ ".- ~'. /~ ',"f'<U'~ · .t".i' ~"'t'" .~,' .-.,. #. ' , ' , ,,,, '-':'0 . ..:/;;;.'" . .' -<t:> " '1 6.... .' E.' ...!,,:!J', r" ,1 ". e::::::: ' " ~ .. , ~ . ," , 1r' ..: . ... U':.. -" ...... . ;:e.-6W-.....~~,. - ", .. ,2't. ~. -A-. ~~ _: . . ~ ...........{!z' .~.. .r. -.? , . 113.t '"1-- ,f." '..',' .c:~,. . '..~\~ .~ .-: .l';:;,,~/ =-:: "09 .~~ ~.~. P.....,.!Y'IU 53:r.r:')s, -';~i~-', ~~"~"}'" / .) ~~b~ & -. ~~~i'~~' ":"~""" ~~ ';'';rV..z;,r ';.< .-i~ '. ~_. . 'k' '.," 54 _ .h....):t... '. <# . '. \";.' ~ .",~.' '\,'.;.r.- .11 J. .;.1"08 ....... '521 'y.~.-.I. . /'-{.>... . 132. r. , ,..,', o.:.-;~~ .......... -~w.' 'I "",. t'(1i -. 0) : .1-_ 'f;'*'J:t'i "~" ~. 'Co".~TI .. ..", .~.~..r.,. ..--"~ '.:;:-. .~t ._-.....J, ,..~ 1'3-::11 ~m~.i. 51~U II-+- ~.., ~i;:t~;';''':'', ".U<I' ..,' ~;.: 131. . - \'\~i.~\' ~>,;;1~' .~......:.:...::;;.~1='If.~:-r.".i! :-p~ ~ ~ 'T t. ,hi:- '.. './'l!! .. ",. '. 'J""... --. . . --"...' I' + '~ . ,', ~. " ltt : ~..~,. '~;//.. -7A..... 130- ~ - .;...~"lJ.1---:..."-.~-:.-. .,' 'I,T ';:-oJ,.'C' 'I -' l07 1.:1 -.... .. .. 41~ ~"\ .. 1- /-,.. " "....-.j.~~.. "'..... , , ~ .~, . :i1'" ~ !! ~- 6.A,! ~2 =1' ..... ) '... 75 I. ~ ..;- ./.?;1-:f. - ~ '-,... ~;'~'-~;: 1 .... .'; IO-.~ I , .....oJ.. .. ,.-- lil~ - ~"~ _'I."'.J' ~ . '-' . - ,/ C"l-IL' 14- ._' .,.,. '.. <" .~ ~ ~ ~--- -.. - -...' . --....... .....--. .'~n6 , lO-~ .". 1{~ 0) 'I=;'" ---".... --;".... .... - .-- N , ...... ~~!!l ," .:" <j 1,_ . (W) _' ...., ~ ..," ~J.:-?'" 0 ..~',!!l I r 'I""'!' .", I:.. -:: I .; I "./. I I . , ;t.... ~h I t I. '. i ~ \;1.:" ~..,'!' . I '.. . : : Ii' :,) . J If' fl'.. t ~: ::!..:::--:.: -.. -.. ...,.:t"tl 15& j:}( 1.; ~...' ',:, ,,'.,. A,;, Md . p". '-':: ,~'.~'" I;, " ,.: ; ! ..1 'c.<-,l"."c ,..,. "'H, "~.L> ;. , ".-c'-'" 1 " I I : lll: II ',;,. ,-!o Jtl ~#-y'7~ ~~;J. ~".."~ :";1; Lr~I.' ~ . . .. . . ." , I.:; t.!~it., '..~~~!. .!.-4.-! ..-:.!... . ..., ~~_.." , . '. ~.l!...:.::~ .:::::....-.,;?=:li&/... 0) ;"#.... t: ". . .... .' .~.. . ---' ,.--==-~-=."..--- "'-'--"-' . -:---'_'___00 _.. ,~';" ~-=-::,,-((,-c;' N\IJ....OI Z;; ~lt-~.'-_._~~"" lO 10 aoOi"'":O):: ~ 10 '''''lPD;O ,;:('1 ('I) 'it'''' lO...... CO' 'i:Ji.o'r'Nt? ';r"ii)mii" Si g g~ 0 N .... tII . lOU)' <0 lO ,<CO ,CQ ..........,... ,... Nro;;""CO - eX) eX) eX) CO all' as CD '<0 O)wO)OI 0> 0) 0> ... .... ... t '~ . .tIr':.~=e ~ !:.~~w:r: __ . ---- o-~~-= . ARBOR RESOURCES Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care July 26, 2007 Gary Chao Community Development Department City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 RE: PRELIMINARY REVIEW Cupertino Village, Cupertino Dear Mr. Chao: I have reviewed the following documents in connection with the proposed development at the above-referenced site: [1] the set of plans (Sheets 1 and 3-11) by MCG, dated 6/29/07; [2] the Land Title Survey by Kier & Wright, dated October 2005; and [3] the arborist reports by Mr. Richard L. Huffington of Mayne Tree expert Company, Inc., dated 8/25/06 and 9/20/06. I visited the site on 7/23/07, and this letter presents my comments and is intended to serve as a preliminary review until more detailed plans can be reviewed. 1. Mr. Huffington's report provides an inventory and evaluation of 203 trees located within or in the immediate vicinity of the subject site. The trees are sequentially numbered as 1 thru 203, and none within the site are defined as "protected trees." There is a significant amount of trees, primarily all shamel ash (Fraxinus uhdei), situated within the public right-of-way (i.e. "street trees"); the amount and specific numbers can be provided upon review of more detailed plans (see further in letter). 2. The locations of trees shown on the Tree Plan (Sheet 4) or map within the arborist report do not represent the locations of trees around the perimeter, nor are they necessarily accurate for trees within the interior. Sheet 4 and the report map identify trees along Wolfe Road as being in a row, when in actuality there are two rows (most or all being shamel ash), one between the curb and sidewalk, and the other between the sidewalk and parking lot. P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo. California 94402 . Email: arborresources@comcast.net Phone: 650.654.3351 . Fax: 650.240.0777 . Licensed Contractor #796763 . ARBOR RESOURCES Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care July 26, 2007 Cupertino Village page 2 of 4 3. More detailed plans showing existing and proposed conditions should also be created and supplied for review, to include a topographic map, site plan, grading & drainage, utility and landscaping. The limits of work should also be outlined on the site plan. 4. A professional survey of the site and trees is necessary and essential to accurately assess the tree-related impacts that can be expected through implementation of the proposed project. In doing so, I recommend the following information is obtained during the survey (to be performed by a licensed surveyor) and presented on a topographic map (or existing conditions plan): a. The existing grades throughout the site. b. The trunk locations (representing the horizontal elevation) of all trees on-site, as well as those overhanging the site from neighboring properties (namely five Monterey pines along Linnet Lane). The trunks locations should be exemplified by a circle to scale based on its diameter. c. The vertical trunk elevation of each tree. d. The accurate canopy dimensions of trees (these can be represented by one canopy where a group or cluster exist). e. The tag/number of each tree (round, aluminum tags with engraved numbers representing the tree numbers were found on nearly all of the trees' trunks). 5. All site-related plans (e.g. site plan, grading and drainage, utilities, and landscape) should contain information specified in the previous recommendation, as well as plan scale and bearing. Canopies of the trees, which will change for conformance to the future topographic map, should not be shaded to allow for visibility of existing/proposed elements or features beneath the trees. For trees to be removed, an "X" should be shown through their trunks. P.O. Box 25295. San Mateo. California 94402 . Email: arborresources@comcast.net Phone: 650.654.3351 . Fax: 650.240.0777 . Licensed Contractor #796763 . ARBOR RESOURCES Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care July 26, 2007 Cupertino Village page 3 of 4 6. The proposed design should conform to setbacks specified within Mr. Huffington's 9120/06 report. 7. There are numerous large redwood trees that are situated at the corner of Pruneridge Avenue and Wolfe Road (southeast corner of the property) but not shown on the Tree Plan (Sheet 4). I recommend this area is redesigned to consider retention of the redwoods by achieving a minimum setback from their trunks of five times their diameter for any excavation, fill or trenching (e.g. a tree with trunk. diameter of 24 inches will have a 10-foot setback). 8. Sheet 4 identifies the removal of the following 26 trees: #60-62, 74, 77, 78, 130-132, 151, 152, 180, 182, 188-198, 200 and 201. Based on the proposed design, I anticipated the following additional trees will require removal: #38, 76, 79, 183-186, and numerous at the southeast corner of the property. Note that these numbers are only estimates, and a more accurate assessment can be provided upon reviewing the information requested previously in this letter. 9. Trees #183 thru 186 are indicated for retention on the plans. During my site visit, I found trees #183 (ash), 184 (ash) and 186 (locust) to be in overall poor and declining condition, and #185 (ash) to be in only fair overall condition. When considering this information, their short remaining life-expectancy, propensity for limb failure, and aggressive root system, I suggest their removal is considered rather than investing resources towards protecting their compromised condition. 10. A tree protection plan is necessary and can be prepared upon the information requested in this letter being supplied to the City for review. P.O. Box 25295. San Mateo. California 94402 . Email: arborresources@comcast.net Phone: 650.654.335 I . Fax: 650.240.0777 . Licensed Contractor #796763 4' ARBOR RESOURCES Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care July 26, 2007 Cupertino Village page 4 of 4 11. Trees #74-76, 81, 112, 113, 133 and 134 are identified as Chinese pistache within the report. Trees #74-76,81, 112 and 113 are actually Raywood ash, and #133 and 134 are crape myrtles. 12. Trees #49 and 50, both relatively small honey locusts, are dead and should be removed. 13. Tree #48 is a flowering plum that has been recently installed to apparently replace the removal of a dying honey locust at the same location. It requires restaking so it has a greater opportunity for survival and stability (the current staking is not to professional industry standards). 14. Regarding replacement trees, Table A of Section 14.18.185 of the City Code should be used as the basis for determining the size and amounts of trees to mitigate those approved for removal. The landscape plans should identify the type, size and amount of trees that will be installed. Should you have any questions or would like additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, ~ <is David L. Babby, RCA Consulting Arborist P.O. Box 25295. San Mateo. California 94402 . Email: arborresources@comcast.net Phone: 650.654.3351 . Fax: 650.240.0777 . Licensed Contractor #796763 ~ ~ Project Name: Project Address: Yes ? No LEED for New Construction v2.2 Registered Project Checklist Exhibit C ... Sustainable Sites 14 Points In Prereq 1 Credit 1 Credit 2 Credit 3 Credit 4.1 Credit 4.2 Credit 4.3 Credit 4.4 Credit 5.1 Credit 5.2 Credit 6.1 Credit 6.2 Credit 7.1 Credit 7.2 Credit 8 Yes ? No Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Site Selection Development Density & Community Connectivity Brownfield Redevelopment Alternative Transportation, Public Transportation Access Alternative Transportation, Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms Alternative Transportation, Low-Emitting & Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Alternative Transportation, Parking Capacity Site Development, Protect or Restore Habitat Site Development, Maximize Open Space Stormwater Design, Quantity Control Stormwater Design, Quality Control Heat Island Effect, Non-Roof Heat Island Effect, Roof Light Pollution Reduction Required 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... Water Efficiency 5 Points gcredit1.1 Credit 1 .2 Credit 2 Credit 3.1 Credit 3.2 Water Efficient Landscaping, Reduce by 50% Water Efficient Landscaping, No Potable Use or No Irrigation Innovative Wastewater Technologies Water Use Reduction, 20% Reduction Water Use Reduction, 30% Reduction ... Energy & Atmosphere 17 Points 'Note for EAc1: All LEED tor New Construction projects registered after June 26~. 2007 are required to achieve at least two (2) pOints under EAc1. I I I ICredit 1 0 timize Energy Performance 1 to 10 10.5% New Buildings or 3.5% Existing Building Renovations 1 14% New Buildings or 7% Existing Building Renovations 2 17.5% New Buildings or 10.5% Existing Building Renovations 3 21% New Buildings or 14% Existing Building Renovations 4 24.5% New Buildings or 17.5% Existing Building Renovations 5 28% New Buildings or 21 % Existing Building Renovations 6 31.5% New Buildings or 24.5% Existing Building Renovations 7 35% New Buildings or 28% Existing Building Renovations 8 38.5% New Buildings or 31.5% Existing Building Renovations 9 42% New Buildings or 35% Existing Building Renovations 10 On-Site Renewable Energy 1 to 3 ~2.5% Renewable Energy 1 7.5% Renewable Energy 2 12.5% Renewable Energy 3 Enhanced Commissioning Enhanced Refrigerant Management Measurement & Verification Green Power I prereq 1 Prereq 2 Prereq 3 ICredit2 a Credit 3 Credit 4 Credit 5 Credit 6 Fundamental Commissioning of the Building Energy Systems Minimum Energy Performance Fundamental Refrigerant Management Required Required Required continued. .. Yes ? No ... Materials & Resources 13 Points 11'II prereq 1 Credit 1.1 Credit 1.2 Credit 1.3 Credit 2.1 Credit 2.2 Credit 3.1 Credit 3.2 Credit 4.1 Credit 4.2 Credit 5.1 Credit 5.2 Credit 6 Credit 7 Yes ? No Storage & Collection of Recyclables Building Reuse, Maintain 75% of Existing Walls, Floors & Roof Building Reuse, Maintain 100% of Existing Walls, Floors & Roof Building Reuse, Maintain 50% of Interior Non-Structural Elements Construction Waste Management, Divert 50% from Disposal Construction Waste Management, Divert 75% from Disposal Materials Reuse, 5% Materials Reuse,1 0% Recycled Content, 10% (post-consumer + Y2 pre-consumer) Recycled Content, 20% (post-consumer + Y2 pre-consumer) Regional Materials, 10% Extracted, Processed & Manufactured Regie Regional Materials, 20% Extracted, Processed & Manufactured Regie Rapidly Renewable Materials Certified Wood Required 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... Indoor Environmental Quality 15 Points prereq 1 Prereq 2 Credit 1 Credit 2 Credit 3.1 Credit 3.2 Credit 4.1 Credit 4.2 Credit 4.3 Credit 4.4 CreditS Credit 6.1 Credit 6.2 Credit 7.1 Credit 7.2 Credit 8.1 Credit 8.2 Yes ? No Minimum IAQ Performance Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring Increased Ventilation Construction IAQ Management Plan, During Construction Construction IAQ Management Plan, Before Occupancy Low-Emitting Materials, Adhesives & Sealants Low-Emitting Materials, Paints & Coatings Low-Emitting Materials, Carpet Systems Low-Emitting Materials, Composite Wood & Agrifiber Products Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control Controllability of Systems, Lighting Controllability of Systems, Thermal Comfort Thermal Comfort, Design Thermal Comfort, Verification Daylight & Views, Daylight 75% of Spaces Daylight & Views, Views for 90% of Spaces Required Required 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... Innovation & Design Process 5 Points gcredit1.1 Credit 1.2 Credit 1.3 Credit 1.4 Credit 2 Yes ? No Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title LEED@ Accredited Professional ... Project Totals (pre-certification estimates) 69 POints Certified: 26-32 points, Silver: 33-38 points, Gold: 39-51 points, Platinum: 52-69 p Cupertino Villal!e Community Meetinl!: 10/18/07 Exhibit 0 Present: Brian Replinger, Kimco Development Young Wong and David Blair, MCG Architecture Kelly Kline, City of Cupertino (18) Werner Gans, 1015 Lanark Ct., Sunnyvale J eryuan Luo, 807 Kilbirnie Court, Sunnyvale Barbara Ireland, 807 Selkirk Place, Sunnyvale Charles & Charlene Cox, 1741 Killdeer Ct., Sunnyvale Eugene & Birgit Boklund, 1770 Killdeer Ct., Sunnyvale Paul Finnegan & Carolyn Bircher, 1663 Martin Ave., Sunnyvale Helen & Ron Nowicki, 722 Kenley Way, Sunnyvale Dan Iverson & Laima Baltusis, 19872 Merritt Dr., Cupertino Bernadette Vergara, 912 Leighton Way, San Jose Warren Mine, 10630 Bezker Lane, Cupertino Roger Riffenburgh, 1630-F Roadrunner Ter., Sunnyvale Stanley Lee, 1698 S. Wolfe Rod., #108, Sunnyvale Good Samaritan UMC, 19624 Homestead Rd., Cupertino Presentation Overview: · 28,129 sf total new retail - 2 buildings along Wolfe, and 1 in the southwest comer · 70-100 new parking spaces · New retail on Wolfe will include plaza area to connect to the Duke of Edinburgh as well as an outdoor space on the right. Plan attempts to improve internal circulation, and to be more pedestrian friendly along Wolfe. · Linnet Treatment will include: o double row of trees (the second row being added), o new sidewalk o pedestrian access o new architecturally detailed and green-screened wall (back of parking structure) · Parking Structure elements: o sloped roof treatment to screen the lot from view o green screen on back and side will be similar to what was done at the new VaIlco garage behind Macy's · New Amenities include a main plaza, enhanced paving elements at auto entries, and enhanced outdoor space. · New Design Elements enhanced archways with more color, new directory signs, lantern style gateways at auto entries, and enhancements at the Pruneridge comer. Ouestions: Q: Can you get people to park in the new garage? A: New and existing businesses will be incentivized to have employees use the garage. Q: What is the timeframe for the total project? A: Ground breaking -- late first quarter, 2008; completion - end of2008. Q: Will Ranch 99 stay in the project? How about the Duke of Edinburgh? A: Yes. Many tenants have long-term leases and renewal options. There are plans to dress up existing storefronts so they will match new buildings. Q: Is the new plan fire truck accessible? A: Yes. Developer has met with Fire Department to ensure that all requirements are met for fire trucks to get through the center. Q: How much bigger will the center be with after new retail added? A: Approximately 20%. Q: Does the developer have potential tenants for the new space? A: Yes, wouldn't pursue project ifthere wasn't good interest already. Developer will pursue a mix of new tenants, recognizing that restaurants should not comprise more than the current 30% due to parking needs. Q: Will the Linnet landscaping use existing trees, or new trees? A: Will keep the existing trees and will add more. Q: Where do you enter or exit with the new design? A: Everything remains the same except that one Wolfe entry will be removed. All construction staging and movement will occur on-site. Q: What will the size of the trees be on Linnet? A: They will be "substantial caliber trees" - 3" trunk or better. The size will be influenced by the need to protect the existing trees from damage. Q: Will there still be access to the playground at the church? (currently an opening with a sidewalk) A: Needs to be examined. Q: What is the parking garage roof treatment? A: Roofing materials will be a neutral color, and will effectively hade car lights from neighborhood. Q: What happens to the existing fence on Linnet? A: It disappears, and will be replaced by the solid wall of the garage. Q: What is the purpose of the new sidewalk on Linnet? A: This was the City's idea to make the east side of Linnet more inviting. (Some discussion about whether or not sidewalk should be added, most felt it would alleviate a current hazard.) Q: How will lighting be handled on the 2nd level of the garage? A: Lighting will be pointed down. Q: Will Linnet landscaping be irrigated? A: Yes. Q: Will parking be allowed on the east side of Linnet? A: No, this won't change. Q: Where will trash be located? A: Haven't decided the exact location, but will probably be more interior because of parking garage placement. Q: Will exhaust levels increase because of extra parking? (may affect preschool) A: This will be considered in EIR process. Q: I like shopping at the center. Will it retain the same flavor? A: Yes. Q: What happened to Charles Schwab? A: Doesn't know. Q: How many compact spaces will be in the new parking plan? A: None. (Compact spaces are not allowed by the City of Cupertino.) Q: What are the next steps? A: Schedule a pre-planning meeting with City Departments, followed by environmental review and a design approval meeting. There will be several more opportunities for public comment. The goal was to meet with neighborhood early in the process, before the formal submittal took place. Q: I'm excited! How long will the project take? A: 10 months, but might hold off on the Wolfe building so as not to disturb '08 holiday season. Community Comments: · Landscaping along Linnet has not been maintained in the past. · People park in residential area even if parking is available in the parking lot (employees too.) Perhaps pedestrian access should be eliminated. · The pedestrian access is convenient for residents, and addresses a safety issue for everyone. · Parking permits might need to be considered in the future even though they haven't had support in the past. · . The proposal is a definite enhancement of Linnet. · A great improvement - much better than previous owners. · Consider posting signs discouraging patrons from parking in the residential neighborhood. · People like staying at the center - it is active even later in the evening. Hope it stays that way. · Thank you for including the neighborhood early in the process. · The view from the multi-family side will be exactly the same as Linnet. Meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Gary Chao From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: David Doudna [dave@doudna.com] Tuesday, November 06,200710:14 PM Gary Chao Kelly Kline; Noemi Doudna Re: Cupertino Village Shopping Center redevelopment questions Exhibn E Dear Mr. Chao, I'm glad the City of Cupertino has conducted parking surveys, but also curious if the parking consultant observed the related traffic on our neighborhood streets. And if he conducted any of this survey on the weekend. When the parking lot is "at capacity," where do you suppose arriving patrons search for parking? I can tell you that many try to park on Linnet Lane. Then the street parking on Linnet Lane becomes "at capacity," and they start parking up and down Parnell Place and doubtless other nearby neighborhood streets. This is a regular situation on the weekends here, occasionally compounded by church traffic on some Sundays. However at least the church goers don't try to leave shopping carts... You see, prior to the installation of a barrier post at the pedestrian portal on Linnet Lane, patrons of the 99 Ranch Market used the shopping carts to carry groceries to their car, and then often just left the cart at the curb, sidewalk, or lawn, and drove off. By keeping the current ratio of parking stalls to retail area, our neighborhood streets will continue to serve as an auxiliary parking lot for Cupertino Village's businesses. Worse, the proposal I saw added a large portal to Linnet Lane which will bring back the stream of abandoned shopping carts. Other nearby shopping centers (e.g. Safeway at Homestead and Hollenbeck, Target on Stevens Creek) are able to maintain a balance of parking to retail space such that we've never seen evidence of anyone forced to park in nearby neighborhoods. With this redevelopment, we have the opportunity to ensure that Cupertino Village Shopping Center handles all of their parking needs without dumping their problem on the neighboring community. With regards to the other mitigation measures (e.g. incentives for using alternative transportation), that sounds great... but if they're really effective they'd have been implemented and we wouldn't have the problem. The parking is inadequate _now_, before the proposed redevelopment. Regards, -David Doudna 810 Parnell Place Sunnyvale On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:34 PM, Gary Chao wrote: > Mr. Doudna, > > Thank you for your email. We are aware of the key issues that will > need to be addressed as this project moves forward such as traffic, > parking and noise impacts. The City has retained outside consultants > to evaluate the traffic, parking and potential noise impacts from the > project. The conclusions of these reports will be made available to > the public and will be considered by the Planning Commission and City > Council at their upcoming hearings (the first Planning Commission > hearing is scheduled on November 13, 2007). > > The center currently has 691 stalls. As part of this project, the > applicant proposes to add about 91 stalls to the site (through the new > parking structure and through more efficient usage of their existing > parking lot). Along with the extra parking stalls, new parking lot > shading trees will be added through out the entire shopping center. A 1 > new linear park with double rows of trees, a detached sidewalk and a > new masonry screen wall (with green screen system) will be provided > along ,the Linnet Lane. Hopefully with some of the proposed > improvements, most of the shopping center activities will be > completely screened from the folks living along Linnet and the > interface between the residential neighborhood and the shopping center > will be significantly enhanced and beautified. > > Our parking consultant has been out at the site to perform parking > demand surveys. Basically, the parking lot was found to be right at > capacity and therefore we are requesting that the project maintain > their current parking ratio (stall/square footage) with the new > proposed project. Most likely, you will see some form of parking > management plan implemented where mitigation measures such as offsite > employee parking, incentive program for employees to use alternative > means of transportation, parking agreement with adjacent land owners > (HP, Hotel or Church), potentially limitations on the restaurant > square footage or opening timing and even reduction of square footage > if necessary. Of course the final conditions relating to parking > mitigation will be made by the City Council with careful > considerations of the facts of the projects and any input received > from the neighbors. > > If you have additional questions, feel free to contact me. I'll be > glad to discuss any other comments or inputs that you may have on this > subject matter or the project in general. Thanks! > > Gary Chao > Senior Planner > City of Cupertino > 408.777.3247 (Direct) > 408.777.3333 (Fax) > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: David Doudna [mailto:dave@doudna.com] >> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:52 AM >> To: Sarver, Shekinah >> Cc: Noemi Doudna >> Subject: Cupertino Village Shopping Center redevelopment questions >> >> Hi, >> >> Neither my wife nor I were able to attend your presentation at the >> Cupertino City Hall yesterday, however I did find some information >> online in >> >> http://www.kimcoredevelopmentgroup.com/projects_view.asp?proid=l >> >> Our main concern is whether the shopping center will have sufficient >> parking for the customers. For years, the parking has been clearly >> insufficient, forcing shoppers to park in our neighborhood. It is >> better now since the shopping-cart blockers were installed. However >> we would certainly prefer not to have the extra traffic in our >> neighborhood, using our driveways as turnarounds, and consuming our >> street parking. >> >> * Are you aware that the current parking is inadequate? >> >> * Will the new parking structure have enough room to accommodate all >> of your customers on the busiest days? >> >> Regards, >> -David Doudna >> 810 Parnell Place >> Sunnyvale > 2 > -----Original Message----- > From: David Doudna [mailto:dave@doudna.com] > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:52 AM > To: Sarver, Shekinah > Cc: Noemi Doudna > Subject: Cupertino Village Shopping Center redevelopment questions > > Hi, > > Neither my wife nor I were able to attend your presentation at the > Cupertino City Hall yesterday, however I did find some information > online in > > http://www.kimcoredevelopmentgroup.com/projects_view.asp?proid=l > > Our main concern is whether the shopping center will have sufficient > parking for the customers. For years, the parking has been clearly > insufficient, forcing shoppers to park in our neighborhood. It is > better now since the shopping-cart blockers were installed. However > we would certainly prefer not to have the extra traffic in our > neighborhood, using our driveways as turnarounds, and consuming our > street parking. > > * Are you aware that the current parking is inadequate? > > * Will the new parking structure have enough room to accommodate all > of your customers on the busiest days? > > Regards, > -David Doudna > 810 Parnell Place > Sunnyvale Page 1 of2 Steve Piasecki From: Greg Casteel Sent: Thursday, November 08, 20077:37 AM To: Steve Piasecki Cc: Ciddy Wordell; Kelly Kline Subject: FW: Concerns from residents of Linnet Ln, Sunnyvale, CA It doesn't look like you received this, so here ya go. Greg -----Original Message----- From: akashpai@gmail.com [mailto:akashpai@gmail.com]On Behalf Of Akash Pai Sent: Wednesday, November 07,20079:17 PM To: cityatty@ci.sunnyvale.ca.us; citymgr@ci.sunnyvale.ca.us; otto@ottolee.org; Building; Cupertino City Manager's Office Subject: Concerns from residents of Linnet Ln, Sunnyvale, CA From the residents of Linnet Ln, Sunnyvale, CA 94087 and adjoining neighborhood. We apologize for the wide distribution of this email but we were not sure which department it should be addressed to. We want to bring to attention the proposed work on Cupertino Village shopping complex by Kimko Realty Corp. As per our current understanding this involves construction of a multi story parking complex (visible from Linnet Ln) and the opening of boundary separating Linnet Ln from Cupertino Village. We would like to strongly object to these changes as it will: . Significantly increase the traffic pattern on Linnet Ln. The proposed change will allow automobiles to enter the Cupertino Village parking complex from Linnet Ln. This gravely impacts our privacy and security. . As you may be aware, there have been multiple thefts in the neighborhood. Adding additional traffic flow will likely increase the probability of thefts. . Residents of Linnet Ln purchased houses with the premise that this road is a "dead-end", according us significant privacy. This is reflected in our home value and property taxes. Changes in traffic pattern will reduce our home values and thus is a non-starter. . Our children today play freely in front of the houses with the knowledge that this street has very low traffic with neighborhood residents driving at low speeds. This will change with the proposed development. We cannot accept these risks. . The proposed multi-story parking lot will be visible from Linnet Ln, this is a significant "eye- sore". The current shopping structure is a single story and the boundary separating us provides a decent amount of privacy. Any changes to that is an issue and not acceptable to the residents. . We currently suffer significantly from increased parking on weekends when Cupertino Village patrons park their cars next to our houses. This increased traffic is not acceptable to us but we live with it. Any additional traffic as a result of new development work will test our patience to the tipping point, i.e. is not acceptable. We strongly urge the mayors of Cupertino and Sunnyvale to take the view of their residents into account and maintain the sanctity of Linnet Ln and adjoining neighborhoods. Weare collecting signatures from the residents to register our protest. 11/8/2007 Sincerely. The Concerned Residents of Linnet Ln, Sunnyvale, CA and adjoining neighborhood. (sent by Akash Pai, 1761 Linnet Ln, Sunnyvale, CA. 408 255 7711) 11/8/2007 Page 2 of2 Date: Nov. 8, 2007 Notice to: Cupertino Planning Commission, Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Council Members Subject: Objection to U-2007-06, ASA-2007-10 - Cupertino Village Proposed Re- Development. To: Steve Piasecki - Community Development Department, Mayor, Vice Mayor and City Council Members I am a resident living on 1725 Linnet Lane, right next to the proposed re-development of Cupertino Village shopping center. I will be directly impacted. I cannot be at the Public Hearing on Nov. 13,2007. I would like to summit my concerns officially. I OPPOSE the further development of the shopping center. The shopping center is already beyond its parking needs. I understand that a parking study was done recently and has concluded that there is 100% usage of the parking at peak times. Also I have found out that in this study, off street parking was not taken into account. Let me assure you that during peak hours there is 100% plus usage of the parking in the center. Many people park in front of my residence then walk across the street to eat lunch, dinner and shop when the parking lot is full. The peak times are normally Saturday and Sunday during lunch and dinner hours, on Friday at dinner time a.T1d during the lunch hour during the week. Kimco Realty Corporation (the owners) want to add more buildings totaling 24,455 square feet of new retail (restaurant) space on existing parking spaces. A new two story parking structure is being proposed. The parking structure is replacing lost parking spaces due to the new building plus 71 parking spaces. There is not enough parking now. Where are the new workers and new customer going to park? In the 71 parking spaces? The developer is proposing a 15 FEET pedestrian walkway through the bottom level of the parking structure on to Linnet Lane, Sunnyvale streets for further parking needs. TillS IS UNACCEPTABLE. More parking spaces must be made in the shopping center complex. The local residences petitioned the City of Cupertino, before the city council on Sept. 2, 2003 to close the opening to the shopping center along with other concerns of the neighborhood. If this re-development goes ahead I would like to bring up these issues and have the issues added into the building use permit and or construction permit requirements. 1) Close all entrances to the shopping center on Linnet Lane except for those required by the fire department emergency requirements. This issue has be discussed at the Sept. 2, 2003 Council Meeting. 2) Build a wall or fence around the Church property. Have a keypad entry doorway in the wall so that the church members have access to the deeded parking access. 3) There should be a condition of use that there would be no bars, night clubs or any activity that goes beyond 10 PM at the new retail structure and any new tenants at the existing buildings. An open air parking structure is being built facing residential streets and the noise from the parking structure will disturb the neighborhood. . 4) A planned trellis fence is being planned for the rear of the parking structure along Linnet Lane. The fence will be higher than the parking structure and the length (600 feet or so) along Linnet Lane. Vines will be planted to grow on the trellis to make a solid green foliage covering. Sounds really nice if properly done and maintained. Over the last 20 years, through 2 previous owners of the shopping complex the landscaping on the Linnet side of the fence has NEVER been maintained properly. We will have DEAD vines on the trellis. If a trellis is to proceed, a condition of use permit would be needed so that a 10 year bond issued to make sure the landscaping is installed and maintained. 5) As a requirement of Construction - there should be no construction vehicles, delivery vehicles or construction worker's vehicles on the streets of Sunnyvale surrounding the construction site. A further requirement would be that the developer make arrangements to have an off site parking and storage area for the construction worker parking and equipment. The men and material can be bussed to the construction site. 6) Delivery time laws of the City of Cupertino should be strictly enforced and ticket given, not warnings for any violations, enforced by the Santa Clara Sheriff's department. In short deliveries are from 8AM to 8PM on week days and from 9 AM to 6 PM on Weekends and holidays. 7) Noise laws of the City of Cupertino should be strictly enforced and any violation ticked without warning given. No noise greater then 55 DBA during the night and the commercial noise level of the day time of 65 DBA with brief daytime incidents given in 92.25 of the Cupertino Municipal codes. Which allows the sum of excess noise duration and the excess noise level does not exceed 20 in a 2 hour period. Example an extra 5 DBA for 15 minutes or an extra 10 DBA for 10 minutes during a 2 hour period. 8) As a requirement of construction the developer is to install an automated recording (computerized) noise monitoring system that the City of Cupertino noise enforcement monitors to make sure that noise levels are not exceeded. This device will be able to inform the construction company when it is about to exceed the noise and so they can comply with the noise laws. The sheriff s department will not have to come out due to noise complaints. Note sheriffs department may not have sound measure devices and the officers will not want to stick around for 2 hours at a time to monitor the excess noise levels. The computerized system would have a digital or hard copy report or graphs so enforce can be made and tickets issued for violations. Also the reports should be public records. 9) All current Cupertino Municipal ordinances are enforced. 10) A sound wall should be constructed first so the surrounding neighborhood is not disturbed during construction and this will also prevent accidents from children getting to construction site. 11) Dust prevention should be implementing and required during construction. 12) Residence privacy should be respected. Meaning there should be no view from the shopping center complex into the residence windows, garages, doors under any circumstances. 13) . Requirement under condition of use permit that a person representing the ownership of the shopping center be present at the shopping center at all business times. Interface for the residences. city. tenants and customers. 14) All up to date codes and requirements be added to the condition of use. Update all code statures. 15) Hide the roof air conditions for all view of the roof tops. 16) Hide view of the trash cans from surrounding neighborhood. 17) Add to the condition of use permit - Prevent any smell (odor) problem escaping to the neighborhood or within the center. 18) Prevent car headlights from shining into the neighborhood for the parking areas. 19) Construction hours should be from 8 Am to 5 PM weekdays only. 20) Prevent car headlights from shining into the neighborhood for the parking areas. 21) Prevent noise from parking areas from getting into the neighborhood. 22) Prevent shopping carts from getting into the surrounding neighborhood 23) All toxic clean up be done. 24) Rear property building set back is 20.00 feet to adjacent residential street. Plus any other issues that the neighborhood brings up. ~ Dean Fujiwara II /9 /(J 7 1725 Linnet Lane / C Sunnyvale, California 94087 d.fuiiwara@comcast.net Rev. Kristie Olah Senior Pastor Pastor Gail Chiew Associate Pastor Chinese Ministry (408 )253-3620 Mark Teagle Director of Music and Family Ministries Carolyn Robbins Youth Director Estacie Brooks Helen Kung Office Managers Loretta Wong Preschool Director (408 )996-8290 The Good Samaritan United Methodist Church 19624 HOMESTEAD ROAD CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014-0607 TELEPHONE: 408/253-0751 www.goodsam.info FAX: 408/996-2621 GSUMCAO@Prodigy.net October 29, 2007 Gary Chao, senior planner City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 RECEIVED NOV 0 6 20m RECEIVED I'WV 111tlll'. BY: BY: Dear Mr. Chao: Thank you for hosting the neighborhood meeting regarding the redevelopment of Cupertino Village Shopping Center. We greatly appreciate being informed about the proposed plans so early in the process. As neighbors to the shopping center, we are concerned about the proposed parking structure. In order to protect the safety of the children in our preschool and to preserve our parking agreement with the shopping center, we are asking you to add the following conditions for approving this redevelopment project. First, we are concerned that the added parking in the back of the center will substantially increase traffic on the driveway between the former dry cleaner and our preschool playground. There is currently only a lightweight fence between the playground and that driveway. We feel that adding an 8-foot, solid wall would alleviate our fear of a potential disaster if a car should lose control and would protect the children from the auto exhaust fumes. This wall should extend all along the diagonal side and south end of our property. (See enclosed diagram) Secondly, the enclosed parking agreement states that the church has rights to use 200 parking spaces at the shopping center. We appreciate that they are maintaining and even increasing the available parking spaces close to the church. However, there must be reasonable access for church attendees to get to the church entrances from their cars in the back lots and parking deck. Currently, there is a walkway on the south side of our property. It has raised paving to keep cars from blocking it and posts to keep Page 2 grocery carts from passing through it. Please be sure that the proposed wall includes a pedestrian passageway. Thank you in advance for your attention to these issues. We look forward to working with you and being a part of the future of Cupertino Village. Please keep us informed about future design reviews. If you have questions, please contact David Chapman at (408) 739-9332 or chaponegret@yahoo.com. Sincerely, ,{(J~l/( /)/_~ David Chapman,~~e President ~ If l/t feltt-J~c J "- (bfit Bill Hutchinson, Trustee VP ,..- ..r","'.........r...""",.,,. Ene. /...----../J. ..,/-,~ //~_.. ) , ;'.) , ,W~ Cindy Pellew1l1o, Trustee Secretary /itl!;i1id::t,rd Chair &14 /1t, tJ<-1~ Carolyn Bircher, Church Treasurer ~x~ Rev. Kristie Olah, Senior Pastor I' . -.1 c '. ., c. r-. L (') .fTj)....,:... ('1.1',,,,,, ..... . '.' . .1' . <.: '.' ./. "-- BBI8j-(Q --me< K\C'06 . Ael~e.f\AeJJT ~V~~1 ~r (tgpf!r~O~~V " 103UO Tu,n: ^VCIIIJU C:upc'lio',u: C.lilu,",. '.I.~1I1 ~ TcI"l'hulIC 14UU) 25:1-.15U5 UI:I'^1l1MCNl or I'L^I~NING ^NU UEVE'l:UI'h!L:NI April 10, 1975 ~ ~ Mr. \'!urrell CillH:rt, A.LA. , 1 GO J:lC.:k~oll 5 t. Sun Jo~el CA 95112 .. Subject: ExdliJnge Agreement Datell JaTluury 24, 1966 - Vallco Purk nnd . Guuu Salllur 1. l:..1I\ Church Dear Mr. Gilbcrt: --" Thi9 lcttcr il:! .u brief follo.....-up to our recent tliscul:lsion concerning ,~h~.:sub-. jeer exchu1\l.\c agrel::ment. /VJ we dillCUUt;ed,. it .iJppeurs that in 1966, UPUII ellnsidcrntioll of n ut;;e permit tu develup the Vallco Villal.\c Shuppinll Ccnter, this allr~l!mellt \Wl:! filed with... the City i\ldicatill~ t:lwt upun construction of thl.! patkinl1 [uci1iticl:l within . the Center, the Church ..wuu 10 huve rir,h ts Lo u tili:lc thul:l~ f ucili tiel:! in con- junction \dth Church-ri:lnted activiticl:l. I UEHlIlme yuur illlJuiry ill relul:I.!O tu thc ufficiul uta'tu!:! uf said agrccment in view uf pOliti lblu devclupmclI t un the Church l:l i tl!. . .; It'9 my opinion thut ill 1966, official rccu811ition of.this ugreement was known to the Ci ty . :Il1d to SUIII~ lh!I.\rce IWIIC t.iOllCd upon thc g run tins of the utle permi t for the :;hul'plllU centcr. \lU\~cvcr, it wuuld uppl.!ur thut ill order to offid.u'lly recognize thc r1l.lht to utili:lc the pnrldnl:: Hpuec:J os a pal-t of Church-related cOllGtructloll, this will havc to be lIlUU~. u },urt of [l1l.y f\lture U!JI.! pertuits for Church con::;truction. Thcrefore., iuos\IIuch [Ill you huvc imlicu ted thut the. Church io 1I0\~ COlltclllplntillg ulhlitiullOl cup"tructiull Oll the sit.c, ie will bl!. ncc.ettuury to file the siglleu uurCclllellt with tI,e u,,;e permit ul'p11c;Jtion. so thut tlHl COlluII1uoion muy be as:Jureu thut \lurking i:; av~i.l.u~~c on Vullco Put:k propcrty~" .1 hope thIs information \~ill be helpful. If yuu have Olny queations"concerninu th11llllutter, do not hcsituLI.! tu CUlltUct me. . "'-':-', ,":.': '" ...- Sincerely, CITY OF CUPERTINO '" .~a?1.<.n-~-I;A~ -:'lilies' 11. :->1 "It '. l'lanllillL\ Ilh'cctor .' .111$: fr CU~~ <t <J" ~ oJ.. o .....;i!l'a. " ..'Y J, I i;..,~. f""'1':lto..'" .... ~ CITY OF CUPERTINO;~~%. ~ r~ CAI~IFORNIA o ,~ . f ~ T~L~PI-jON~ ALPIN~ 2-4505 10321 S. Saratoga.. Sunnyvale Road C\"'l.( , .f"r Cupertino, California 95014 :r... 0 ~. February 7) 1966 Mr. Richard C. Morris Attorney at Law 24131 Summerhill Avenue Los Altos) California Dear Sir: Reference your letter of January 25) 1966~ per- taining to a parking agreement between the Good Samaritan Church and Vallco Park. Tl).e City staff.has reviewed the proposed agree-:- ment along with Mr. Walter Wafd of villco 2ark and we are satisfied that the wording of the . agreement is such that' it would enable .us to grant permits to the church for.expansion as far as parking requirements are concerned. . Very. truly yours~ /., . ;:{ .- . .-f. /.... 7/,. . . . . ,of';' /'. _..' .....~~~~~ . . ..' .-' >;,.W 1m ..-f\J] zwn . " '/.... /<' h'// As-s.t";-""City Planner '. '. C:~:////" '" ," ';;. . . '. . ...., . .' . -. ,- ...... " .:. . . '".', . .....", . '. . ',-. . .... : '.. " .... '" .... . .' . . . : :: '-'~ ; , :. .; .'. , . , , . . {'f'. " . . " ;. .., .. . .' ';:.' . .. . , ... ;' :. ,". .: .;', ':. :,.,. ':.. . .. . ..... " . ~. '.:'.,1 :" .... .' , . . . ',' ",- ,0, . " . ,: ~ . 'j , i. , . .:;,~... >/....::.. .'. . . ", ::': .R'~dRAR~'G~ .Mo.RRis'.,:",,>:>;,.:, , ATTOR'NC:Y AT LAW .. '..I~I .UMM E..HILL AVENUE " '. ";.: 1.0,8 ALTOS; CALlPOIllfU . . 'WH"IiC:LI~' .:..:1. " .. . .' , .... J'" " , ' . ,'.'.: J~n~ar""2'5' 1'96'6 ..,:.. .:.',".':.:;'", . .' ..".' .' I..". J I ., . .:.." ".:.J . .. . . ~:~... ...: . -:' .:. : : " . City of Cupertino . 10321 S. Se.ratoga-Sunnyvale Road 'Cupertino, California 95014 Re: Good Samar.1 ta.n Chuch,. 'Un1 ted. Evangelical Br~thern - Vell~d Park. l. t. . ~ I ~. ...... A ttn: J. Nuzum, Assistant Planner Gentlemen: I enclose herewith a copy of an exchange agreement ne gotiated between The Good Sam.ari tan Church, Uni ted Evangelical Brethe~n, arid yallco Park, invdlvlng the ' exchange of properties and provisions for church parking in your'city.Mr. J. .Nuzum a.nd, I am sure, other me.mbers of your planning' commis sion are familiar wi th the tena tive arrangements fOI\ the exchange and parking accomodationa. .. Mr. Walter P. Ward of Vallco Perk has been, or ,shortly will be, in touch with you concerning these matters. . :. ...... As you are aware the Church intends as soon as .it is able to make application to the City of Cupertino for a permit or permits which will enabl~ it to make.ad- ditional improvements on its property at Linnet Lane and Homestead Road with the purposff in mind of accomodating a larger membership. A t such time t he Church will rely on off Church proper.ty parking, not to exceed 100 :st'a'lls,. as made available to the Church by the agreement.~:xpres'sed in the enclosed document. ',i t' If, in. 'your judgment, the e.nclosed document does not sufficiently in'sure that the Church will have the available parking to support the contemplated applications for permita, ple&se advise a.t your early convenience. Ii', as we .feel, the document 1a sufficient for that purpose, please so indicate.r. As I'understand it neither the Church norVallco Park will prooeed 'With their planning pending' ari expression from you.. . '. ' ~ ,'i '\,.' , .' Very truly yo~~, (, ' ~~~dl Copy,' ,nExaw.:ngeAfY'..::!n~ 3,;' '," ..,;. >;,:1 ,:'. :::;;,:~.,<:/\. . ~ .",:..:.~. ...:..~._ t ~~.,: : . ...... "',; ',"."... , ..... .f .', . . . .' I . . . . ~. -' .' ". .." .: ...... . ',. ." .". . . .-...:.{...........: -':'.' ", . ......j: r .~':':':l ,,-.... --- ~... ~:.1':,,\'.. EXCHANGE ^GREEMENT AGREEMENT, as of February 7, 1966, between VALLCO PARK, , a California corporation (hereinafter called "VALLeO") and 'THE GOOD' Si\MMtITAN CHURCH, EVANGELICAL UNITED BRETHREN, a corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CIIURCH"): WHEREAS, VALLGO is a general partner' of VALLCO PARK, LTD.. a limited partnership formed pursuant to the laws of the State of California; und \~llEREAS, VALLeO owns Parcel No.1 ilnd CHURCH Own6 Parcel No.2. each of which is more particularly described in Exhibit A nttachpd hereto; and WHEREAS, VALLCO ~roposes to construct Vallco Village Square Shopping Center on property adjacent to' the real property hereinabove referred to (a preliminary plot plan of said Center is anne~ed hereto as Exhibit B and by reference made a part hereof), which !ihopping center will provide in excess of 20~ parking stalls within a distance of 300 feet .of a church entrance; and WHEREAS, the parties' hereto are desirous of exchanging said parcels of real property upon ehe terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, IT IS THEREFORE AGREED: 1. VALLeO shall promptly open an escrow with Western Title Guaranty Company, Santa Clara County Division, for the purpose of consummating said exchange. All costs of escrow, including documentary stamps and recording" shall be c'it the sole cost nnd expense of VALLeO and be paid by it. 2. Each of the parties hereto shall therea[t[!r cause to be deposited in C6CTOW Gront Deeds conveyinG the properties to be exchanct'o hereunder free and clear of all ~ncwnbrances, save and except covenants, conditions, restrictions and public utility easements of record and current property taxes a lien not yet pDy~ble, to wit: VAl.LCO l'AIU~, LTD. shall dded Parcel No. I to CHURCH and CHURCII !;hal1 deed Parce! No.2 to VALLCO PARK, LTD. -1-' ~,. \ \ ,,"'''- .-......~ ...\ -. --..... ".,. ,- ,.- "I..... .\....,..~..i7;.'( ,......r-I.- II'...........~.._ '-..."..J....; ., ~:.:: .J';-_ ';'.-.'~.. ~'_/ .',1. .,.'-r-:..~:.~:..~ - .-, ;.).', -.! "--~l_' r-'-'.~ t "'.'\. " ~ .~- t") '. ,r- i~".,; 3. As a further conGideration for the within exchange, VALLeO hereby grants to CHURCH, or a successor CHURCH, the non- exclusive right to permit persons attending the CHURCH or p.articipating in CHURCH i1ffairs to use the parking facilities of thc center dC!lcribed in Exhibit D so long as the CHURCH I S property remaining after the conveyance of Parcels No. 1 and 2 is devoted to a church use, whic11 right shall not be construerl or deemed to be a covenant running with the land. If any use other than a church use occurs on the existi.ng . CHURCH property, such right shall terminate. CHURCH coven:lnts that it will n~t pennit such inv(tecs to unduly interfere with th~ operation of the shopping center by its tenants or otherwise violate the parking rules thereof. 4. In consideration of the granti.ng by CHURCH of the option referred to in Paragraph 5 hereof, VALLCO ,will provide a strip of paving 8 feet in width or more as required by the appropriate o government bodies on Linnet Lane and landscaping in an 8-foot strip to be installed at the time VALLCO contracts for paving and landscClping-' th~ shopping center and of the same quality and kind as that provided for the shopping center. The area to be paved is cross-hatched in green on Exhibit D, and the area to be landscaped identified thereon in red. VALLCO covenants further that it will proceed forthwith to 'develop and improve its properties in the manner described herein. 5. Contemporaneously upon depositing the Deed referred to in Paragraph 2 hereof, CHURCH shall deposit an A~rcement whereunder it g~~~'t~' 'to VALLCO an option of first refusal to purchase the r~al' prop,crty owned by CHURCH situated in the County of Santa Clara, , ' State of. California, described in Dook 4615, Page 749, Official Records, County of Santa Clara, excepting therefrom Parcel No.2. Said ri~ht of first refusal ~hall be in form approved by counsel for VALLeO. 6. The interest, rights, and obligations herein incurred shall accrue to and be bindinr, upon the assigns and transferees of the parties hereto. -2.- : '''.::''':'op..,' ;,...f":~~"" .......'.:.....~ '':;~::'--,..).-k;'t \:-:-- .:....r.\:"'....I.:~~~:J...r:"""',\.. ..~;".,,:~.'\::~. 't, r-'-"';:....:~.......,~:_~.~ ,.~~..';.:.J ,. .~... 4..,.rl ~IL.~~.~~:a :~'''. ..~,;~:..;.; .",J." r'''''"';:~''~''':~':'' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto through their duly authorized officers acting pursuant to their respective Dylows or Resolutions duly adopted by their Boards of Directors, have.executed , the ~ithin Exchange Agreement 8S of the doy and year first above written. . . . :~ur;;iL!: ii.or.':on Authorized Offic€:r lJy 7t;;LC I? .1/;....,.,(.: d.r......7J Author1zed Off1cer m -- .. .' _-3.' ~ i.... ., -3- ; ......... 1. ,. .' -,- . . ,. .....:.. "':.....:;\. ..,rh....-.. ""':~_. w..-.r:-:.r'~~'~/:,:-;'..; llo..i\,....(l,,('_.........~r,~:'.~:1::..,.:tJ;.;........;,4;...;.;........c'";\r":::;:r.~:'....:...::""""~'~...J ~~,..,;,y..,...~:.......r::~:__.!;..:~~y:..;.,~:;.,~~. .. -~, 'If'. " . , r#!UL ''4 ". GRANT DEE D .....r. ..' --.......1.--."":'-:--. " , FOR A VALUABLE C01lSID~'R!\TION I receipt' of vlhich is horeby n e knov/ledGed I CALU'ORNIA CONl" gRBNCE j EVA HGELICAL UNI'fEJ) BRE'r~mEN CHUHC:l, a corporation, f,ran ts to THE ,900 D S!U\\ARI TJ\l'1 CH.UHCH I. ' " EV~~GELICAL UNITED BR1~rlREN, a corporation, the'real property in 'tho "County of Santa. Clara, Stato of Californj.a, described 0.3 foll:o\'/S: : . . .' ImGJ:Nl'rli~o o.t tho 'nt.f)l'lJOo't~on of tho SO\lthorly .: . . . :.:.=-....._=-:::.- ,1.ine of Homestend Road (forr..erly YoUl)~ Hoo.d) ~. . r~~I...!:~~;"~Yl VIi th the .c:ostel'ly line or Becker Lane o.s shown :. ~~'::: :'~(l ' "upon that certain Hap enti tled "Record. of Sur-. : 'r.".'".'~~~',\~":... .. ': vey of the Land of Burrell Leonard" wInch 'Map" .': ."~ :\; "?, >~,-r \\~.' . :..' . was .filed for recoI'J. 'in t~e off ico of tho ';' .i ..-A:?,Sf;.J.{!\,.;,...'.. .Hecorder. of the Count-y of 'Sant.a Clara, State : ..' ~'. ~)"..:-,:..;~~~::.::::~., of California on. July 8, 1955 in Bo01c 60 of . '" r... :;/.~:::,:~:~"tfq,;~,: l\~atJ~, P::l.30 30; thenco along the Eo.ste:::-ly line . ~ h~;\;'-'i:f~;~:-t of Bec1cer Lane South 326. '"{O feet j thence H. . : ._~::.!~..!..-'-_' . 89? 411 E. and parallel with the. Souther ly , .l'ine of' nome s tea.d. Road 216.00 fee t; thence . -- .. . .' "::. . ":,parallel' wi th t,he ~a5terly line of Bec1-~er Lane ,. ',~ , .... North 326.70 feet '';0 the Southerly line of . ~~" ,_ ' liomestead Rond; thence alont?) 9a:l..d Southerly" ....:. .,line S. 090 41'. W. 216.00 feet to the ?oint of ' > bOGinning. COl~Tl~INnxG"a;?pro:xil;la'tely 1.620 acres of land and bein~ a portion of that cer- tain 161:.52 acre par~el of land r,onveyed by S. Q. de'Ar~ello, et a~" to Lo.nuder E. Gardner, .by~eed.dated April 2, 1870 and recorded. in Bpok 1.7 of Decds,a.t 'page 348, Santa. Clara, '. . C.ounty Records ~ . '. . ;,' ,.. 'n IN WITNESS \\'1IERJ~OP~ ,said corporation has 'cau~ed its cor':' porate seal to be affixed hereto ~nd this instrument to bo executed by' its ~resident 'and Secretary thereunto -duly aut-. horized. . ~' DATED : i'l,' v ,~ ..,..:.. ~ e......- ~l.,- ., 1959.. CALIFORNIA CO~fERENCE, EVANGELICAL mlITED. BrtETHREl.'\f Ch"URCH, a corpora- tion ' /.. / ) v ,. ,By: c: ,LJ ?~~7,rY_.'r' -' pre3id.~nt . . 'j!;:-<< (T 7r<",.L. .~ ,BY: ~'JI" 'J c. - Secreta.ry , ..:.... i?23832 aocr.'4G15 i't.cf74G I f\ f//Jf!.UL r'A G R I\. N T DEE D i' ;, .....,..... --"I;'--.--:"'~ " Fon I\. VALUABLE COllSIDc.'R!\TION, receipt' of which is hereby acknowledGed, CI\.LIFORNII\. CONr'gRE1WE, EVAHGELICI\.L m~I'rr::J) BRl:."mnEN CHUBC:l, a corporo. tion, r.rnn ts to THE j]00 D SAi\II\.RITJ\N CfmI1CH, ' EVI\.HGELICAL UNl'rED BRE'l'rlJillN, n corporation, tho'real property in '{he County of Santa.Olo.ra, Stato of Californ:l.n, described o.s fol1.0\'1s:' . l:mQr.NN;I:i~o o.t 'tho .'nt,fH'uoot,-on of tho Elo\l.t.hor'l.'1 ....__._. . line of Homes tend Rond (1'o1']':)o1'1y y oun~ H oad) t;;:;~;:::'~'J!l V1it:;h the !:ostcl'ly line or Becker Lane us shoV/n C--':l.~-. ~"~l .upon tha t cer tain i.,tap enti tloc1 "Record of Sur- (.:"..',::~~'..'\);~,'.." .' vey of the Land of Burrell Leonardll which'l.\ap' .. ..~\: "~ .:...~.). I\~.' '... wa~ .filed for recorll 'in t~e off ico or tho '-A:~.:\~;':lr.f./\:-'~""'" l~ecordcr.of the; County of 'Santa Clara, State ":)":":i.;~:,;:..::..cS:--., of Culifornia on. July 8, 1~J55 in Boole 60 of . : ........,-... MatJ~, P:l.60 ::;OJ thencu alonr; the EUDte~ly line of Beclcer Lane South 326.?O feet; thence 1~. e9? 41' E. and parallel with the. Southerly , Tine of' Homestead Road 216.00 feet j thence . .' ':" ".. iJarallel' wi th t.he Ea~terly line of Becker Lane .:.....North 326.70 feet to the ~outhcrly line of ..' Eomestead noadj thence alonG Daid Southerly .line S. HgO 411. W. 216.00 feet to the -point of bOGinning- C01\TAINDW"a;>proxi1no.tely l.620 acres of land and beinB a portion of that cer- tain 164.52 acre parcel of land ~onveyed by S. O. de'l\.r~cllo, at al., to Lo.uuder E. Gardner. by~Dood.dated April 2, 1870 and recorded. in 'Bpok 17 of Deods. at page 348, Sunta Clara, . C.ounty Records ~ r-. .~ porate seal to be affixed executed by' its ~resident horized. . DATED: i'l,' V ,~ v:- \0 ~ y- .t..- , 195Q. ,', ,. ., ... . :. . . .'\... . ;' :~. '. . 0, CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE, EVANGELICAL 1.JNl'l'ED. BRETHREN CJ-HJRCll, 0. corp,ora- tion 1/....... ) . v . . ..' , P-' J7.0 . . .By ; . , (.~ . . L , .......~), '7 rr _.v-, . (/-(J (f:'-/ By: ~J.I 1"". (/j <::. _/rc-l..:.~-:-> . Sacre tary i~f28832 BOer. (1015 ,~ . n N,C[ l Ll J ;;;./ r ,'\ r. j1 r. q ':1 :,'\"" C [' ~", ' I {\ .._!.J , .0'.. ." ..u \...!J '" ,,- r . J' .,,,, , ,- /l . " I ,,'': -i \ l~':' I u" h j r'..' /' ,', ,......"..I~......, 0 l~, .... . ..; ')/.~Yi';'~;,)::,:,:'::;'~:", Prcsident (' "~ ~ ~ ~I?7/D)J 6&0..0 G4/v'1A?/rA-AJ U'&7?-J::;O/S-r C/:JV,!iZCH . P. itA II I -;1r2-GPL -;: C/'Z/&/tJAL fiWp#--ry ~F OItJRCIf. ?Atz.cs- I = .0/75 4C-12E 5r,L-/? ~PL.A1JD ,DJi3I3lJGP To CHv.H:H f7UJM /.J A- L LC. D ?AVL fl3:I2- A6~ tJ,c 7h73b' ?M C l::L '2. - . I Lf Lf ,A-ctL& 7,iU A-}J 6-LL- Pi a::.E tJ F t 4.;.J D PCC-O 7Q tI ~Q) pA/LIt... f? ETL- ,/J-&f2Ct3" tU E PI (J;: 7 FEB ~ 0. ~f2-CE2- J- c.. 'I _ PI)J/J1.- ?P-<J P&Z 7'1 () uJJJ eo 15Y Ctfr.J..e.CI~ A-;=7c-n hL-L f~SFBL~. :t EIJ1J &uc--v-tS R 10/ vJ J{}e2-& /7).J/J.{.,/-u:.-o j;:k:::I?-E ;:iJ/1-~ .' ~ j,.M-CE L "c ,. =' /JrLcEL A -t pf)(2.Ct{L 1 - P/JILCCL- 2- . . c == 'A - I - '2.. =- : ;-, oPEc' AY7AeHiY .tx;ED [;E:$crarmopS f pt:Ar HM. ~ ....,J a ~ PARCEl: \ All thilt cl!l:tain real pl:(lr)(;~t-ty situ.1te in r.r,(! City of CUp(,rLL.~o, County of Sunta Clara, State of Cnlifo~nio and b~ing more particularly describod as follo~s: Bcginnin~ at a granite mOllument at the intersection.of HUOll'stei'lrJ Road as said Humestead Rood formerly existed, 40 feet \~ide, qS shO\m on the m~p of thnt ccrtnin Tract No. 1906, Verde Canlens, Unit 2 .:1 nl.:Jp uf \Jhich is fiil'd in fiord, SIn of Mups nt ['.:Jge 36, in t1'e O([ice of tl)(' County Rt'corder at sllit! Santa Clnn} County; thence fl:um said point of bE:!g,inning s~024'02" 'vi along the centerline of l-lolllestcnd Rand 416.12 feet; thence. ]t' 'in~ said centerline S 0017'12" E 20.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF Ih,--..~NING, also knQ\,'11 ns the Northeust corner of that cel-tain parcel of land conveyed by. Califol-ni.'1 COf\f('rcnce, Evangelical United llrethr.en Church a corporation to the Coati Scllnaritan Church, EVlln:,.;elical United Erethren, a corpot'ation, by deed dated N,ovember 5,195') nnd reL'(lnil~d in Bl(.46l5 of Deeds at Page 749, S.anta Clara COLlnt)' Rt!cords; thent.:l' continuing"S OU17'22" E along the East line 6f said lands of Gootl Spmuritnn Churcll, et aI, 214.74 feet; thence leaving said E<!.st line N 440))'lY" E 5.67 (eet; thence N 0017'22" \v 210.74 feet to a' point in the South murbin o( Homcst~ad Road; thence S 89024'02" \.J along the southerly marr,in of Homestead Road 4.00 fee t to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 0.0195 acres more or less. PARCEL 1. All that certain real pt'operty situute in the City of Cupcl.tLl'" County of Santa Clara, State of California and being more p.nicularly described as fa 110\,. 1') : i. . Beginning at a granite monument at the intersection of ~ume5teaJ R()"ad as said Homestead Rand formerly existed, 40 feet ,vide, as shown on the map of that certain Tract No., 1906, Verde GHrclens, Unit 2 a map of \,'hich is fil~d in Book 98 of M.-1pS at P<:rge 36, in the Office of the County Recorder of said Santa Clara County; thence from said point of bcginnin~ S 89024'02" W along the centerline of Homesteau Road 416.12 feet; thence leaving said centerline S 0017'22" E along the East. line of that certain parcel of land conveyed by California Conference, Evangelical United BrcthH'n Church, a corporat~on, to The Good Samaritan Church, Evangelical Unitl:d Brethren, a corporation, by deed clnted November 5, 19S9 and recorclE:!d in Hk.4515 of Deeds nt Page 749, Santa Clar-'a~C.Qunt)' Reconls,..214..74 feet to the TRUE POINT OF nEGINNINC;; thence continuing S OU 17' 22" E along said East line 112.00 feet to the south~ast co~ner of said lanJs o( Good SLlJ1laritnn Church, ot al, thence S 89024'02" 'vi along the 50uth line of said l:\nds of Goc.lcl Samaritnn Church.; et aI, 112.00 feet; thence.! ~ 440J3'l')" E 158.82 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 80ntnininc 0.144 acres more or l~ss. \. " " - .----. .' . II!" .. ~1.<o'. t I .' . f ~~.o, It)> 0 (Tl f ~ I [) :n t )< I I ~.: I ,. n z :r:: r ,: In J (l1:l}J I (P ~\ i I ..... (1 t -l 10.-1.( I I i I '0 I Y r i o Ul r p ltol . ." r I~ !. 'f ("l I. . l' 0 I~O III !.: t 11 \J ~l.J " I'~ n r. r- \.~ (Tl )> ;.u 0 .~ . - r. 1'\ <.,-)> .- :. t. . -1 '\:J J> ~. .l ' .0 . . ~, ). \J .i ~0 . \' S1 (' :'0 J- I' m 0 )7 I( <:: " ~, "., )0 U' Z -\.~ ,. L.~ .- 1. 0 ~ (\ Y. '"f"l 4~ .: 11 ' / ;'". 14 0 ~'"'t , -~ ~ I lJ c .l> 9-., . <- . n M'c )7 o - ,. - ,,'11) 1- Tit (11 I n trlJ 0 In ..{ pQz: <... '0 7J . 0 r I -~ ( , \L' 0 II )r :::: ,,~ )I n r I" 111 () )> ," , ." r ..." \ L..... 0 lfl C'lQ/l :c V' 0 V z: ~~~ -0 I -\1 \ ..~ z: \'r~, .} I \. - 0 (il Y-\JiQl \ ,- r (I z .P ~ ITl I D~~ T I -I D IjJ 11' ~, m ITI t{) I" ?J r rJ \F fT).J)O I,,~ v~ ) t.: \)J ~~". \..~ .. 7L-~ :::; ~ o IE: ~ ! ....\ PARCEL "A" ORIGINAL CHURCH PARCEL GRANT DEED (4615 OR 749) PARCEL 1 DEEDED TO CHURCH FROM'VALLC ... "';-...: 00 ~" :0:.. : PARCEL 2 DEEDED FROM CHURCH TO VALLO ., . . . . . . ...... . '::. I .' I .0' ..... .,: r.--: . .... .f. LI NE 'j ABLE: LINE BEARING DISTANCE 1...1 N 89'2-4'02" E -4-.00' Ll N 00'17' 22" W 2. 00' L3 N 89' -4-2' 38"' E 9.00' L4 N 00' 17' 22. W 30.00' CURVE TABLE: CURVE RAD I US DELTA LENGTH Cl 20.00' 89' -4-1' 2-4-. 31. 31' C2 8.50' -4-3' 20' 29" 6.43' ,C3 8.00' 43' 20' 29" 6. 05' Kimeo Realty Corporation PROPOSED RE-DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL NOVEMBER 2, 2007 VILLAGE SHEET INDEX 1 COVER SHEET 2 SITE SURVEY 3 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 4 TREE PLAN 5 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 6 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 7 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 8 SITE SECTIONS 9 SITE SECTIONS 10 ENLARGED PLAZA PLANS 11 SITE ELEMENTS 12 SCREENING AL TA/AC.SM. LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR: CUPERTINO VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LLC 1~~B~~"''''f;, ~:e~~~i~~~ ~;i~~~~;; :::~~o;~.,~ ~n~~li~~d ~~~:Jllili;~~ ."~~''''~ ~~~~l~~~~ ~mi;m g8~~~~~~ ~i"":l;Q;"" .. j~ lO .01 ~ c ~~ ?'~~~8~ig~1l~::~C:~~~~2~nq>O~Mi'~':.i1'M~:ll ~ o~' ~;Sl~~~!~~~~~~2~~~j ~~~~~~~I;~~ ~ ~: ..~,,,"'~'~~"~2~. ~~'o.r N~~\I~ .J '~o;;~"ll~o;:~~!~~i:~o~ ~..,1,s;e:i~!~~ : :.. f'~~.~~~.~~~f~~~""~i~~ ~~~~tilB~!l:t~~~: ~~-",~~~~~..~~~~~~~.?t 2R u~"'~~t~~~ F C>p~Bb~~:irP~..i~iil~5:i", ~y~~~~:~~;lo'1 ~g ;!8~~~;'~Q,~l;li~~!~;{~~~t if~;q~~~~~i ;!. ~2..~l/jOi~t,.,~'i'''''-:i!''~"'\''''FIiI ...zl!l~~Y.':i""2~i ~t 1z~::l~~~~~~I~;~;..~~r3"~ 2~i"''''tlil~'~:t~ :l.~ ~~'~~~~I:?~'"'~~~~~S,;~;. ~ J'lm~:~~.I::~~~~ ~" !::~.~!::~~QliI~ii1'~~alOl~~i r~~~p ",~~p~x ~.:J :.~:~:~~i~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~:~~~~"~,, '~~ "i'o.~~~~~.!'i~' ;' ....,~~. ~ : ~J . ~ ~~ca~~ ~~ ~g~' ~~~~ ~.. r m~ ~~ ~u 5~ m~ :~ m !'it ~:~ ~~ ~~I;i g~~ ~ i~ .- . " <>",i=l ~:;: ,a:::iiJ:l ::<~ ;!i=l ~.~ .,;;lQ ~;~~ ~~ .....ljl'" ~~~~ ~~~ ~j~;: "P ~~ ~:i .h H~~ ~ ~~~ ~ .~ ~~. (lZ"'" .~~ ~~:$\~ :i ~i .:<~~~: ~~ q .~t8.. ~~: SiR.. ~ ,no ~.. 0 ~6i ~::~ .:.~~G ." ~S~ ~~~ ~:t!: !*~ .i~ :i:~ e~ ~~~ ~I ~~~~~ ~i~ ~~ ~~" ,i~~ ,,"I.., ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ 3ljiz ~~: ~)o: ~~ <?,...JX q2~!l1 " - ~ ~~~ k~a ;;: m~ ~~. ~~~ ~p.;:l 'i~..,.. ~. , ~~1 :~:~ 4< i'I~^ ~;: 9t~ d~2 ;J~2 ~~ -""~I; ". ll'! ~~~ ~..:J ""..~ 2;'.1 ~~ ~~ ~ei e~ ~j~~ .~. ~. ~" ~ ~~~ ~'?~ '?~ 'i:~ i5,~ '" , . . . ~,~ ;~ :~~~~~ ~~ if.l ~i:l~~nt. ~~ ~ -. ~: ~~ ~;~~;~ ~~ ~i ~I~~~~ ~~ .t :.~~~~ i~ ~~ ~~~M ~; !i;:~; ~ ~~B~~ ~ ~~i~' ~ 2; ~~~ ~=~ ..~ "0 ;~~ '"8~ ~-4i m ~~:J: H~ "~ '. !. =~~~ mi ;~.~ ~~~i ~ ~~~~ ~~; r;:ljl~ ~~. ~ia ~rd t~ 6;-1g._ ~ (!/!; 'O~ p~ ~;;~ : :~~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~:~:~ ... ~~5~' ~~.~ ~i~i ;:~i ~~8 ~ ~~~ ~!; B"i~ t:~~ ~~~,~ ~.~ 'C'O 9, ~:~ ~~~~ ~:~ ~. ~~ >Ii E !~~;~ "'SJl",;r;: ~ ~~.~~~ ~ ji:;;:" ;,;.:~~ ~~~~: a~'~t~ l:~",~~ ~~~~ j;jpa2 .~:~ ~~~. "';:lIS ~~~;6 ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~gF: ~S ~~ H l!l1:~~ ;~ ~~i9~6 ~ i~ ',0 ! ~~ !~~ i[;;R '. R" h~. ~I~;~ P9,,,, ~.~ ~, ~ri I I i~ ...~ ~~:i ~"~~~" q ~ i~-' ~~ ~~~ :~~ ..>1 ~~ i~ "" .~ii:~~~ l,!i' ..:~~ ~~m R~ 'I"'....'" .:I':: ". ~"'iX z t~~ ~~ ~i ;;;l!l9~ ;J"l ~;t~ei a~ ~~,~~ ~~ ~j~ 6~ ~; 1'llil;;!'" ,'#: ,~~ m! ~<II~9.~;;l :Ig~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~'-'; a!~ ~g . :g~.~ ~~ ~~~!i ~~ ;B ill~ ~~~lil~ ~':': ~~~; ~" ,,~. !l~ "I:::. &d ~"" : ~~~ ,'0 8 ;!;i~ ~.'i; ~~ ~!~I ~. " '. ;:~~i -. g,!:... ~ i1~~ . ~i. g~ ~~~ " i~! ~~ : ~~~ " "l~ ~~... ::i~~ l~ ~iq ~ ~ ~ ~~ " ~~~~~ ~ 0 Y' ~ ~g,;,!z;:' ~mn :f:Zl'll:l" lill! , lll~i!;i ~1';! ~ ;~~ .. ~ 5~. ~ ~;,~ ~~i 9, : :z"z S"'o: m "p ~Jl~ ~~ ~~~ ~; ;~i ~ ~ c~ ~ ~~~ ~ l!l~:::i , ~~~ i;J,.: Pi~ ~~ ~~ IUf 3~ ~~~!;; ~~ , 1111 Ii '" il~~'1 ;i IilP~~ ~~ E: ~~ 9, ~ " Eii~ H m J:":ii:l .'!il,!: ..~ m '-jgr ~~: ~~~ '- ~i ~s~ ~~n: i~::l '"'l.e ..~ ~~; ~g~ ~::i!~ :~~ ~" "';Ii ~;~ ;:'~~ ;~ ~~ '" ~~ %~~ '!,S' rf~~i ~?;i~ , :;l'r ,!'l' ~~~~ ~ ~![~ ~n~ !~i,i " -, ~!l~ ~.!!.r! ~la It ~~! ;q ii H II ~ , ~ !~ij iln~ l~.t I'; ~H 301;: !i~ ;i: ~ " "Ill U!~H{ :~al; ; rn ',"~h~ U!~ll l ~~h~n ~~~I~. :I P.ii~'~i ~~:,~~ii f !,!!; ~ 3.. ~ ..~" s?-i P~j!h ![:-!h~ ~ ,o~"lo. i,.!.l 'mm ~m~i ~$-Jf~: i! ~!! ~ '~J! n.~~: ! ~ '"Iii ~~~ \l; [~ ~rr ~i ~i! 8- nh ~ Hi ;;:.i ~ !!. ..... I'm j ~ ':!;; l i II i @ ~ e ~ ~ e Ii " lUH Iii! '!~~H "t~l~ ~-E~ O,~ ~~; IP;:~ ;!~ ~;:~ j!i pO l~l on ~1l fi~ '. :;11 t '3 .. . I ~B'~ ~~1 ~ ~ !. . rs "' ~~ < lllllil!1111 Ii ,,~,.~,.!?,~< !lj!I!!i~!~ H~~ir3Qr3 ~~ i':;~i~~~~ ~ n~~~i~; g l~J~~;~; ~ h~~~~~~ gJ ~~a ~~~~~ ~ ~l, ~~~ Ii m ~;~ ~ ;'fl ~I' ~ I I I. pup II!-~; ;,j n a ~ . .. a CUPERTINO ~'~ "'~ .. .. U en ;1:1 ;;;~ III 11"14'07"( .... UIl1'(lOOO) P ~h (j :~~,,~~ "~~I< ~~,., ~." i.:&~; ..~~; ~ "<. (A::l'" ~~~ B.. ,~. ~!: Ii~ ~i .. ~~ .< ., .~ '::'" ,0 l~ ~ hiD ~ o ~ I ~ ~D "J lJ I' .- " -. --I~I Ir----~---PRUNERIDGE-AVE~~, ---"'-a-: (A PUfJUC sma(1) ::. ~ ; I . 0 I HOU.ENottK '0 ,0 ~nn:n ~i~Jj~!! ~" . ~ if ~! ~" ~ Hupnnnnp ;n~~p"~~~hd~ .~ " "~.'"r'.'" H ~ -~. P'i H . ~ ~. ANZA. ~g I I ~ I I I I I I I I ~ ~ I I I ~ ,,'}' / / ;;; I I I/'........~". €I ~ II rc:s.....~ ,,/ /: j'; ~~, / / --.. .. / ;' ~ . ;' ! PARCEL TWG ".,. , (OOCfI(J.<<lfiUf) o,;;~ @ ~ ' ~ I ~RA1OOA- Nl"VALC / --.- 01 < Ii .~ ~ " -< " 1; \ ~~~~;fiililn~'!R~'~ ~i'~.;!J!l9g1"1;i · I' · ! · . . " . . < ~ . i ~ . < ~ ' "_BI.,~'~'~sl ' ".' i5; Ii j!l :i!" Fl" ~ e:t III ~ eo 'iI la'" , '~.'.' ,q~ a -'. i , . , , . , , . . ~ 0 "i:' fll'Pllf' l "" ("(DOl/GO') _16 )> Iii! '",~ ~~fri ~'I1r I~~~ ~~:i "',,~ p:len ,em nl II II /I ... II UI @ + It f o. o II i I e@ o ! , I , I I 1,5I'~ I, ~~I~1!~" , I , f , I , I , I , I , ! I , I , I , I , I , I . J ..~"'-- I ("UOR GOII) ~J~ ~I~ ~li n , :E I~ I m ;u' ~ ~- ~ o .e ,Q'"'GM:(34lT (OOC. NrJ. /flU".) @ " I """I ". 'I , f f i II r I J l , 1- ';,ZI 8 ~~ I ~ ~~ 110 ~ \ l\~~____ ~IP , ,I! r'~--- - J l/ ,01 i II ,I .J: I -\1 I ,I. .1 I: I Ii . : Ii Ii! i\'1 ., , Ow ~-..;:____ 1 PARNELL " PLACE ,:<~r r~~----. .~~ /' ~ i ! , I I I \ I , I I I , I , I , I , I , I , I \\ , \, ,\io . , 1 o~ ,- ~ ~ ~ 1 o "1 Aifr~; LARK LANE (5) ,0 I , ',,'i 'I'! ....11i! g::; ~;: I ,~Il '~Il '/1 " :11 I" ;~: :'';;1 :' ,I II II I, " ~ Vo e " , , ~ I j , I , I , 0, I . , I , 1- , I II \J I !;~~ -.;"1 ~O ~ ,.; " ~r WU1J1J f 01 .. ,0 ---~~--- ---------- ROAD .. o ___..Y________ - ----------------l-l~-- ----. -----.------~::::::::-~- C"'FlJRN" ~ KIER & WRIGHT CIVIL ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS, INC. 3350 Scott 80ulevord, 8ui Iding 22 (408)727-6665 Sonlo Cloro, Col i lornio 95054 FAX 408 727-5641 _,.....c.t.12-Z7-0!I Ul'DAlm m PItll' 11M lIEl'I:ll 0l1U,'tlI 1IDAltDPPCltM<<JITSOllllIQI ~~;~~~ARE ~ SIDEWAll< :=\ ACCESS ~ - --=--~~ \..,. 'IL~ \ --- ~~J. 'l '~~. __~;. ~-= L1~NET ~~~__:=- _ , --"~,...~ _.~ L --/ -'" .1- 782 PARKING STALLS 691 PARKING STALLS --------1 ..---=----- I I I I I I I I I I 10 1<( I~ 1<( I~ I~ I~ I I I I I I I I I I 1 ------------~ PROPOSED I III [ I I I [ III I 1111111111111 1T =:J I EXISTING 135,736 SF SLOG AREA 112,607 SF SLOG AREA 36,564 SF PARKING DECK 1 WOLFE ROAD ~ ClO 0[7 ~ ~ , DATE: MCG JOB #: CUPERTINO VILLAGE CUPERTINO, CA SH EET 2 NOVEMBER 1, 2007 06.102.01 SITE PLAN DATE REVISIONS Scale: 1" = 50' E8z rv7 Kimco Realty ~ Corporatjon ~ 25' 50' 100' @ MCG ARCHITECTS 2007 All RIGHTS RESERVED NOTE: This infonnation is conceptual in nature and is subject Ie adjustments pending further verificatjon and Client, Tenant. and Governmental Agency approvals. No wlllTlllllies or guaranties of any kind are given Dr impllBd by the Architect ,- [ ~ ~ DATE: MCG JOB #: JUNE 20, 2007 06.102.05 DATE REVISIONS @ MCG ARCHITECTS 2007 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED NOTE: This Information Is conceptual In nature and Is subject to adjustmants panding furthar verification and CDent, Tenant. and Governmental Agency approvals. No warranties or guaranties of any kind are given or imprmd by tha Arch~ect. LEGEND ~ (E) TREE TO REMAIN /-, I . \ (E) TREE TO BE REMOVED \ J .... ,.,. o (N)TREE '0--0'-0- - -c(1D 0 0 O. --- - -- ~ C:'C:' 0 . ~ ~ O 0 ..' 0 o o 00 00 o () . Qv:Q\ '_J\,< (. , ,_I G,l) @ ~ fTl\,k' V @'~'" ':-;~.". '(~ " ~. :;-: .-, - - ~ .~~~. .' ,,'~,", ;,.....,... ,'. ',,' ~. c- .,-,~ ~, TREE PLAN 0', ~-/?}-~-~0'~~~0rI-;' 0'0mAE:)00000-~--0 0-.0---- ~. ~ ~-J0 8~' · . 0-- o r(:) (:) r\:" \:., -~-~ ~.O.) ,-,- (:) I;' ........ """'0. @. . ~r':\O' 000.,,' '~,,"." . . · vv " _',~%~~:g) '.~ o 0-0 (:) "l't;""~ " ,,,,,,J,,,, , , , " ' ' .."'~.' , <" .~~,.. "'" -~ /-, ( . )~ . ) ,- ....". (:) (:, ,'/ -~ ( . ) ,- o C:' 0 ""f:) o @...~ ~~-.4', , ",:.-, o o ~O. 0 \J 0 SHEET 3 ~,..-",','< ~ -..... ( . ) ,- (:) (:, ,,/ "''' I . , )'-~ I . \ \....,.,. J @) o ~'... o o 0' o o o o o o. 00 o o 0 o o o o o o ,...... ( . , ,_I o o o o (:) (:) -- (:) (:) /-<-....~ ~ a { \ a 0, 0 . " · . ., . jO" 0,' 0 0 . 0, . .' ,:" \.....)(~- -'.~ ." " . ' ~ ' '. CUPERTINO VILLAGE CUPERTINO, CA I'V7 Kimco R~alty LM. CorporatIOn ~ -,~~, ---1 j j -, o~rn_' "TI~ ~ t ~ WITH VINES / / / 15' 130' 125' EAST ELEVATION AT RETAIL A ALONG WOLFE ROAD OPAOUE TRANSFORMER SCREEN wrrn MOLDING DETAil WOOD DETAILING FABRIC AWNINGS WOOD SIDING 22' ~~~~ 21' STUCCO OVERHANG t t t l WEST ELEVATION AT RETAIL A DATE: MeG JOB #: JLNE 29, 2007 08.102,05 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CUPERTINO VILLAGE CUPERTINO, CA SHEET 5 o 5' 10' I"'V7 Kimeo Realty ~ Corporation DATE REVISIONS Scale: 3/32"=1'-0" ~ @ MCG ARCHITECTS 2007 All RIGHTS RESERVED NOTE: This Informatton Is concaptual In nature and II subject to adjultm8nts pending furth..- veriflcatlan and CII8nt, Tenant, and Governmental. Agency appmvats. No warrantles or guaranties of any kind 1f8 given or Implied by lt1e ArdlIl8ct. SOUTH ELEVATION AT RETAIL A NORTH ELEVATION AT RETAIL A J 200' L NORTHEAST ELEVATION AT RETAIL B DATE: MeG JOB #: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CUPERTINO VILLAGE CUPERTINO, CA SHEET 6 JUNE 29, 2007 06.102.05 DATE REVISIONS Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0" -':.~ r;t<~,~: ,-'.. rv7 Kimco R~alty LM. CorporatIon "'- ~:-, ;--i"' ':(,): r ;~Gi ~.;a ~'.:: ~'~'~!-~c-: -:',f;,; @ MOO ARCHITECTS 2007 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED NOTE: ThIs Information II conceptualln n81Uf8 end Is subject Ie adjustments pending further vertfIcatIon and Client. Tenant, and Gov.-nmen181 Agency approvaJs. No wanmties or guaranties at any kind are given or implied by the Ard1118::L l' 65' 1- SOUTH ELEVATION AT PARKING STRUCTURE/RETAIL B Scale: 3/32" = 1 '-0" "~-"'""'--"""""""" .._~"- . '-"",' Of'I!;:N t PED t AUTO ENTRY EAST ELEVATION Scale: 3/32" = 1 '-0. PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION AT LINNET LANE Scale: 3/32" = 1 '-0" "ii~ ,.....~ WEST ELEVATION AT LINNET LANE Scale: 1/32" = 1'-0" DATE: MeG JOB #: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CUPERTINO VILLAGE CUPERTINO, CA SHEET 7 JUNE 29, 2007 oe.' 02.05 DATE REVISIONS './;, rv7 Kimco R~alty ~ Corporation --- '>'.1. ...;;~, "'i:: ::,J ~~ "_CiS " i ~;,-" @ MCG ARCHITECTS 2007 AU RIGHTS RESERVED NOTE: Thllllnformatkln Is conceptual In nature anc:lls subj8cl: to adlustments pending further verification and Clent. Tenartt. and Governmental Agency approvaJa. No w&n'8r'Ities or guaranties of any kind il/'8 given or impIiMl bV the Ard1i1ecl : J------ RAMP / ~\~"lN~ ./. ~1~tJC\:l .1 ~~ I ~~^t h-h--t ~l~Wt\ 'fL..ANT ~~ A. SECTION LOOKING NORTH ALONG LINNET LANE / ~\-&ilN& ./. ~t~tJC\:l ~rGTl~ l-tCo~\ ~ ~t;::~ ~ ~lN ~ ~ ..r---:>-"'~ ~ l:-,j , LI L1t..1tJF-:T I ~~~~ I ~~^Y j~ c:pl~~t\ l'L..AWT ~ ~ B. SECTION LOOKING NORTH ALONG LINNET LANE DATE: MCG JOB #: JUNE 29, 2007 06.102.05 SITE SECTIONS f>~~~ t...lt{NE:T l-JaLHe ~I } ~I'" ~ t :+ I~' \: f. J ~ (ARl<:I~ ~ t&rrhll- .BtJU..t:nwcp cp~N C;;C;r<:~~ L-t'tmCe:: o.llTH Vl1Jss. DATE REVISIONS SHEET 8 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0. ~ I 4' 8' 16' @ MCG ARCHITECTS 2007 All RIGHTS RESERVED NOTE: This Information is conceptual In natUra and Is subject to adjustments pending further verillcation and Client, Tenant, and Governmental Agency approvals. No warranties or guaranties of any kind are given or implied by the Archnect J:~r~~w r~ NEW "Dl~SyJM.~ LAHE CUPERTINO VILLAGE CUPERTINO, CA f'V7 Kimco R~alty LM. CorporatIOn DATE: MCG JOB #: JUNE 29, 2007 06.102.05 DATE REVISIONS @ MCG ARCHITECTS 2007 All RIGHTS RESERVED NOTE: This Information is conceptual In nature and Is subject 10 adjustments pending further verification and CDent. Tenant, and Governmental Agency approvals, No warranties or guarantJes of any kind are given or implied by the Archrtect. _~O!,,:, ^'>'HH_"'~ I ;illY> PL6dCl- ~ ,r. ....",....".. , .'. -.. ,'-' , .-.,,:" . - I ,~~~~.~ j J:F-F~ ~I'~ ~ 11 ~ I~J p~~~ \'() l~R~ ~~~ l..}r1TlCI;:; W ltH Vl~~ ~1--\s-n~ ~e:. oF c"'~e C. SECTION LOOKING WEST AT MULTI-STORY RESIDENTIAL SITE SECTIONS CUPERTINO VILLAGE CUPERTINO, CA SH EET 9 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0. ~ I o 4' 8' 16' I"V7 Kimeo Realty ~ Corporation DATE: MCG JOB #: /v / ~ ,,' ~~~'-111 r==-=J~... ~~ -~ 7:'~' (~~. Q"'1:~~' ~:,""-"~~e~ ,;~~ 'I ~.'~i~"~'~" .......~~ ,..... I ~-.t~t'~iL1~ir" ~ J~ln. I ~v . -=,::: ~', .:l .-f-.:J,,'#.t -=.....- - ___- ..~ ~~ I KEY PLAN o S'<"~ ~0 <<,,~ ~<::>" 4- <Q..:s '?~O; WOLFE ROAD ~ ..L-v~"'~~--- ft ~.~~~&.. --.:::,-'. \ I J (Y . . ~~~..;.:~. I t. -;.~" ....;-. -;I ~'I :=-J#.... . ~~..'-.. -. , a':-". e ...t.?'I....~ ~.:.. ~ ..~ II ~r~~'.:;.:'~. ~..~~- r, fl' , ., -.;., . ,. ~ I~ ~~~-~~. c:.:hl~ l "" ...... j~~~';'iz4, KEY PLAN r--- I .~ ,,;F ;,.; ./ . 1 ----:; I ; ! '-l'ti .~ .;. PROPOSED RETAIL 15.500 SF WOLFE ROAD I~ ~~--"' t;~~ ) ,:'~7. ~.~ ~ I .-:.~ "">"__ ';y-' I ......'It>...r~. . '"", _ . ,.'. ~~ -- ... II ~<_~ _,...., f!f ... Q .: I f[:~~~4--~' ~l ,I ~,":J'-J~~h~' '~'l)~ I 1j~tlb:.~:. .~.. f r:~ ~ . _.._ ~~~--t;: 1 KEY PLAN JUNE 29, 2007 06,102.05 ENLARGED PLAZA PLANS CUPERTINO VILLAGE CUPERTINO, CA DATE REVISIONS SHEET 10 @ MCG ARCHITECTS 2007 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED NOTE: This Information Is conceptual In nature and Is subject to adjustments pending further verification and cnent, Tenant, and Governmental Agency approvaJ9. No warranties or guaranties of any kind are given or implied by the Ardlftect. I"V7 Kimco R~alty ~ COrpOratIOn EXISTING BUILDING 18,387 SF WOLFE ROAD ~.;' .~~ '"-z::-~:: 1 1~>~"~~. ~.r~~ I - -~... ~~~. ---~;.~ : '~.'Q.:!...~~~.;I .~.. I r~'~[i ~~.\' P:-' r- z-~ :~, 'i~ ~.~~ ;.,~..tPi ~~.~ ~p--;; 1'i:J. ~ ,;.:;;-~.. ~y~~.~~:'::; KEY PLAN }lE;W r~lk " ~E;1JJ OJ~1Q ~tm<.1 . }:;U5~l;:ti \ OPAQUE RICE PAPER LANTERN ln METAL COLUMN WITH TRIM PEDESTRIAN GATEWAY PROPOSED ENTRY LANTERN DATE: MCG JOB #: JUNE 29, 2007 06.102.05 SITE ELEMENTS CUPERTINO VILLAGE CUPERTINO, CA SHEET 11 DATE REVISIONS rv7 Kimeo R~alty ~ CorporatIOn @ MCG ARCHITECTS 2007 All. RIGHTS RESERVED NOTE: This InformatIon is conceptual In natUra and Is subject to adjumnents pending further verificatjon and CfllIl1l. Tenant. and Governmental Agency approvals. No warranties or guaranties at any kind are given or implied by the Archnect. , , I ;' '. .,,' It '~'J.l. 'Ii . ...." /f"-;~ .1, 1/!i,f" ",,:, , ,. , ' "-!-.~...' .' r < .~F l ~' , l' '. ( l' p~ " .1lt '-0 ..... " " , '^ " ..... " " , @