Loading...
CC Resolution No. 04-386 RESOLUTION NO. 04-386 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DENYING THE PETITION OF OLE AND BIRTHE RASMUSSEN SEEKING COUNCIL RECONSIDERATION OF ITS DETERMINATION DENYING THE ASSIGNMENT OF THEIR LEASE OF CITY OWNED BLUE PHEASANT RESTAURANT AND BAR TO GITI MAJDY AND KIANOUSH KAKA V AND. WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino owns certain property in Cupertino known as Blackberry Farm Golf Course, including buildings and an adjacent parking lot; and WHEREAS, the golf course pro-shop shares its city-owned facilities including the building and parking lot with a restaurant-bar facility known as the Blue Pheasant; and WHEREAS, the restaurant-bar facility is an integral feature of the city-run golf course, where the two operate in symbiosis; and WHEREAS, the success of the restaurant-bar is important to the City not only for the revenue from the lease, but, more importantly, as an adjunct to the city-run golf course; WHEREAS, the Blue Pheasant has been leased and operated for the past thirty years by Ole and Birthe Rasmussen, who have now expressed a desire to retire; and WHEREAS, the Rasmussens now wish to sell their business and assign their lease to Giti Majdy and Kianoush Kakavand; and WHEREAS, Giti Majdy and Kianoush Kakavand wish to buy the business, assume the lease and run a full service restaurant-bar with expanded uses; and WHEREAS, assignment of the lease requires the approval of the City Council; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the lease, this proposed assignment of the lease came before the City Council for review on June 21, 2004; and WHEREAS, the City Council, based on their findings, denied the request by the Rasmussens to assign the Blue Pheasant lease to Giti Majdy and Kianoush Kakavand; and WHEREAS, the Rasmussens, by and through their attorney, Paul M. Hogan, have requested the City Council reconsider their decision; and WHEREAS, the City Council set a hearing date of August 16, 2004 to reconsider the assignment of the Blue Pheasant lease; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all relevant evidence presented by the parties at all hearings, including evidence presented at the August 16, 2004 reconsideration hearing: Resolution No. 04-386 2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: 1) The Rasmussen's request for approval of the assignment of the Blue Pheasant lease to Giti Majdy and Kianoush Kakavand is denied. 2) In making its determination, the City Council adopts the following specific findings: a. Based on the resumes of Giti Majdy and Kianoush Kakavand and the testimony of Giti Majdy, the proposed lessees have no experience in operating and maintaining a bar. This is a significant detriment, since the operation of the bar can have a substantially negative impact on the adjacent city-run business and the surrounding properties. b. The proposed lessees have no experience operating a full service restaurant. The proposed lessee's only food service experience is in the fast food industry. The Council finds this experience insufficient since the operation of a full service restaurant is vastly different. c. The proposed expanded uses of the facility will conflict with the City's use of the shared parking for the golf course. d. Even though the rent payment to the City is "guaranteed" by the retiring tenants, the main source of income to pay rent is derived from the operation of the restaurant-bar. The City Council finds that the proposed lessees lack of vital experience adversely affects the likelihood that the restaurant will continue to be financially viable and, consequently, the City's rent payment will be in substantial jeopardy. e. The Blue Pheasant is a City asset owned by the taxpayers and operated in conjunction with a city-owned golf course. It is the responsibility of the Council to protect City assets and to encourage their best use. It is not sufficient that the restaurant-bar rent will be paid and is guaranteed by the current tenant. It is more important that the operation be a vital, successful, well-managed going concern that enhances the city-run part of the facility and protects the surrounding neighborhood from any detrimental effects. In this regard, the Council finds that the proposed lessees do not have the requisite experience necessary to meet the City's needs. . . . " " .. ;!~~' WI' Ie ,/... , Resolution No. 04-386 3 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupet1ino this 16t11 day, of August 2004 by the following vote: VOTE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATIEST: James, Kwok, Sandoval, Wang Lowenthal None None ~2~ City Clerk APPROVED: -M~~#~~ -