The URL can be used to link to this page

13. Larry Guy application City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 Fax: (408)777-3333 CUPERTINO Community Development Department Summary Agenda Item No. 13 . Agenda Date: Tilly 17, 2007 Application: Z-2006-05, TM-2007-02, U-2006-13, ASA-2oo6-22 Applicant: Larry Guy Property Owner: Douglas Russum Property Location: 10855 N. Stelling Road Application Summary: Re-zoning of a l.l-acre parcel from BQ (Quasi-Public) to P-Res (planned Residential). Tentative Map to subdivide a 1.1-acre parcel into 20 parcels and one common parcel. Use Permit to construct 20 residential units (10 detached and 10 attached) on a 1.1-acre site (northwest corner of N. Stelling and 1-280). Architectural and Site approval to construct 10 small lot single-family residential homes and 10 attached town homes. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the following applications: 1. Z-2OO6-05, rezoning of the proposed site from BQ to P-Res; . 2. TM-2007-02, subdivide a l.l-acre project parcel into 20 parcels and one common parcel; 3. U-2006-13, to construct 10 detached and 10 attached residential homes on the project site; 4. ASA-2006-22, to construct 10 detached and 10 attached residential homes on the project site. Project Data: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Site Area: Density: High Density Residential (20-35 d.u./ acre) BQ (Quasi-Public) 48,044 square feet (l.l-acre) 16.1 dwelling unit per acre Environmental Assessment: Categorically Exempt 13 - 1 Z-2006-05,~-2007-o2 U-2006-13, ASA-2006-22 Page 2 Las Palmas July 17,2007 BACKGROUND The applicant, Larry Guy, is requesting approval to construct 20 residential homes. (10 small lot single-family and 10 attached town homes) on an existing parcel located at 10855 N. Stelling Road at the northwest comer ofN. Stelling Road and 1-280. The project site is approximately 1.1 acres (net) and consists of one single family home, one large detached building and several accessory structures. The project proposes the following project details: RESIDENTIAL DENSITY MAX. Parking COMMENTS T'l . U . I Ell'. Count ~ nIts mt" acre reet # of Spaces 20 (10 detached and 10 attached) 16.1 35 to 38 Covered: 40 Open: 14 Street: 2 Total: 56 Since the proposed zoning is Planned Residential and the project site is not located in any specific plan areas, there are no specific maximum height and minimum setback requirements. Project Aerial 13 - 2 Z-200~05,T~-2007-02 U-2006-13, ASA-200~22 Page 3 . Las Palmas July 17, 2007 Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report dated June 26, 2007 for a detailed project description and the background of the related issues summarized in the following report. Tune 26, 2007 Planning Commission Meeting The Planning Commission reviewed the project and their discussion points are summarized as follows: Zoning . The Commission recommends that the Council approve the requested zone change (Z-2006-05) from BQ (Quasi Public) to P - Res (Planned Residential). One Commissioner expressed the desire of preserving the existing BQ zoning designation to facilitate future quasi public uses therefore did. not support the proposed rezoning. It should be noted that the current BQ zoning designation is inconsistent with the General Plan's high density residential designation for this . property. State law requires that zoning be consistent with the General Plan designation. The proposed rezoning (P-Res) will be consistent with the General Plan. Architecture and Site The Commission recommends approval of the proposed architecture and site design (ASA-2006-22). Several Commissioners were concerned with the lack of building separation (approx. six feet) between six of the detached units along the southerly property line and recommended that the applicant join the two detached units along N. Stelling Road to help screen views to . the four detached units behind. The applicant is agreeable to the change. The Commission recommends that the final color and building materials (including but not limited to pedestrian/buildfug/ parking lot lightings, patio railings, trellis materials, outdoor furniture, siding materials, common gateway features or any other similar exterior decorative features) be of high quality and shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. In addition, the following enhancements shall be provided to the project: . Additional screen trees should be located along the southerly boundary of the project to the maximum extent possible to mitigate any potential visual and noise impacts from 1-280. . Pedestrian connection/ access should be provided along the northerly property line between the project site and the adjacent church property. . The applicant shall work with staff to lower the front entry porches and entry stair of unit type 1 so that the entry feature and the front porches are at a pedestrian level. . The common entry points to the court yard areas shall be decorated with trellises and lighting features or with similar architectural elements. In addition, 13 - 3 Z-2oo6-05, TM-2007-02 U-2006-13, ASA-2006-22 Page 4 Las Palmas July 17, 2007 the common plaza area shall be decorated with pedestrian scale lighting and benches. . Bio-swales should be introduced wherever possible along the southerly property boundary. . The curb alignment along the project frontage should be adjusted to allow for a new detached sidewalk with additional street trees planted in front of the project. . Vines should be planted on and through the sound wall to discourage graffiti. Parking and Landscape Treatment along N. Stelling Road The Commission supports having double rows of street trees and the two proposed parking stalls along N. Stelling. This is accomplished by realigning the existing curb to extend out the available park strip area without encroaching into the existing southbound bike and vehicle travel lanes. One Commissioner opposed any parking along N. Stelling Road. Historic Significance The Commission considered the facts presented on the existing home. Even though the existing house is mentioned in the City's informal historic structure report, the Commission found that the house does not have any significant historic value both in terms of architecture and structural condition and is recommending its removal. The Commission recommends the following:. . The applicant shall incorporate elements from the existing home into a trellis or gazebo structure at the common plaza area. . . The applicant is required to work with a professional building salvage company to salvage and reuse as much of the existing home as possible. Green Building Measures The Commission recommends the following green building measures to the project: . The project shall use tankless water heaters throughout the project. Tankless water heaters are 20 to 30% more efficient than traditional water heaters. . The project shall use gas furnaces that have minimum efficiency ratings of 80% or equivalent. . The applicant shall design the roofs of all residential units to be able to structurally facilitate future solar panel systems to account for the weight and wind loading factors. Final roof plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Official. . Non-formaldehyde building insulations shall be used throughout the project. . Lighter shades of roofing colors shall be used throughout the project in order to help reflect sunlight and to achieve cooler roof temperatures. 1-280 Pedestrian Walkway 13 - 4 Z-2006-05,~~2007-02 lJ~2oo6-13/ASj\-2006-22 Page 5 Las Palmas July 17, 2007 Public Comments One member of the public expressed concerns about the project and opposed the removal of the existing historic home. One reside,nt supported the concept of planting the N. Stelling Road with double rows of trees. ENCLOSURES Planning Commission Resolutions Nos. 6476,6475,6473,6474 Ordinance 07-2007 and Exhibit A: Zoning Plat Map . Exhibit B: Planning Commission Staff Report Dated June 16, 2007 (with attachments) Plan Set (please see the plan set attached to the Planning Commission staff report) Prepared by: Gary Chao, Senior Planner Approv~d by: Steve Piasecki Director, Community Development ~ David W. Knapp City Manager F:\PDREPORT\ CC\2006\ u-2006-13; asa-2006-22; tm-2007-02; z-2Q06-05cc.doc 13 - 5 Z- 2006-05 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6476 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING THE RE-ZONING OF A 1.1 ACRE SITE FROM BQ (QUAS1- PUBUC) TO P(RES)- PLANNED RESIDENTIAL ZONE SECTION I: PROlECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: Z-2006-05 Lawrence Guy 10855 N. Stelling Road SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR REZONING WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for the rezoning of property, as described on this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino; and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the subject, rezoning meets the following requirements: 1) That the rezoning is in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino. 2) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to conform to the new zoning designation. 3) That the new zoning encourages the most appropriate use of land. 4) That the proposed rezoning is otherwise not detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of subject parcels. . 5) That the rezoning promotes the orderly development of the city. 13 - 6 Resolution No. 6476 Page 2 2-2006-05 June 26, 2007 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, application no. Z-2006-05 is hereby recommended for approval; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application Z-2006-05, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 26, 2007 and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION ill: CONDmONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits A: Zoning Plot.Map, Las Palmas, Cupertino, CA, dated July 10, 2007, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. The revised legal description shall be submitted to the City prior to final map approvaL PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of June 2007, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Giefer, Vice Chair Chien, Miller, Kaneda COMMISSIONERS: Wong COMMISSI0NJ;:RS: none COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: APPROVED: I s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Is/Lisa Giefer Lisa Giefer, Chair . Cupertino Planning Commission G:Planning/PDREPORT IRes /2006 / Z- 2006-05 13 -7 lM-2007-D2 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TOITe Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 MODEL RESOLUTION NO. 6475 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A TENTATNE MAP TO SUBDMDE A 1.1 ACRE PARCEL INTO 20 PARCELS AND CREATE ONE COMMON PARCEL . SECTION I: . FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning. Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan. 2) That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3). That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. 4) . That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and unavoidable injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 5) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated therewith is not likely to cause serious public health problems. . 6) That the design of the subdivision and its associated improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Tentative SubdiviSion Map is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the sub conclUSIons upon which the findings and conditions specified in this 13 - 8 Model Resolution Page 2 TM-2007-02 June 26, 2007 - resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. TM-2007-D2 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 26,2007, and are incorp<?rated by reference as though fully set-forth herein. SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: TM-2oo7-D2 Lawrence Guy 10855 N. Stelling Raod SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits by the Dahlin Group, titled Las Palmas, 10855 N. Stelling Road for Los Gatos Trade Line Corp. Single Family and Townhouse, dated May 10,2007, consisting of 16 sheets, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 1. PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT Applicant shall work with the City to record a public access easement over the sidewalks around the building, driveway to the south and the rear of the property and the parking areas. The agreement shall be recorded in conjunction with recordation of the final map, and shall be subject to prior approval as to form and content by the City Attorney. 2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS. RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90.;.day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. - .3. CONFORMANCE WITH PRIOR APPROVALS The Director of Community Development shall confirm that the subdivided parcels conform to prior approvals for this site. 13 - 9 Model Resolution Page 3 TM-2007-02 June 26, 2007 CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDmONS (Section 66474.18 of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 22046 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of June 2007, at a Regu1ar Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: -ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: A TIEST: APPROVED: / s / Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Is/Lisa Giefer Lisa Giefer, Chair Planning Commission G:\Planning\PDREPORT\RES\2007\ TM-2007-02 res.doc 13-10 U-2006-13 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6473 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT 20 ATTACHED AND DETACHED RESIDENTIAL HOMES ON A 1.1 ACRE SITE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF STELLING ROAD AND 1-208 SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section TIof this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required. to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: . 1) The proposed use, at the proposed. location, will not be detriment;a1 or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title. NOW, THE~FORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. U-2006-13 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 26, 2007, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: U-2006-13 Applicant Lawrence Guy Location: 10855 N Stelling Raod 13-11 Resolution No. 6473 Page 2 U-2006-13 June 26, 2007 SECTION ill: CONDmONS ADMlNISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVEWPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHlBITS The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits by the Dahlin Group, titled Las Palmas, 10855 N. Stelling Road for Los Gatos Trade Line Corp. Single Family and Townhouse, dated May 10, 2007, consisting of 16 sheets, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to construct 10 small lot single-family homes and 10 attached town homes on 20 residential parcels with one common parcel. The project parcel is also approved to be rezoned from BQ to P(RES). The final zoning plat map shall be revised to reflect the zoning area to the center of the street. 3. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit a comprehensive landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development to provide the following: a. Tree replacement strategies ensuring that the appropriate number, specie and size of mitigation trees are provided at the appropriate locations per the City Arborist's recommendations. b. Tree preservati(;m measures per the City Arborist's recommendations. c. More screen trees along the southerly property line; d. New street trees in the new park strip area in front of the project property; e. Bio-swales along the southerly property line to the maximum extent possible. f. Plant vines on and through the sound wall to discourage graffiti. 4. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN A comprehensive construction operation plan must be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of grading and building permits addressing the following: ~ Staging area ~ Tree protection ~ Construction hours and limits ~ Construction vehicle and truck routes ~ Dust and erosion control ~ Garbage and debris container location and pick up schedule ~ Signage advising contractors of the restrictions ~ Construction equipment and construction vehicle parking locations \ 5. BUILDING MATERIAL RECYCLING The applicant shall show proof that all of the existing building materials are recycled to the maximum extent possible. Proof of recycling shall be submitted. to the City for review and approval prior to final occupancy. 6. HISTORIC PRESERV AnON · The applicant shall use elements from the existing home to construct a trellis or gazebo structure at the common plaza area. 13 - 12 Resolution No. 6473 Page 3 U-2006-13 June 26, 2007 · The applicant is required to work with a professional building salvage company (i.e., Whole House of Palo Alto) to salvage and reuse as much of the existing home as possible. 7. PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ENHANCEMENTS The applicant shall contribute $25,000 for enhancements to the pedestrian walkway along the west side of the N. Stelling Road bridge that crosses over Interstate 280 located south of the project site. The city shall use the money to add pedestrian scaled lighting, paving materials, railings and/or repainting of the pedestrian facilities of the west side of the bridge. 8. SITE ACCESS AND ARCHITECTURAL ENHANCEMENTS . The common entry points to the court yard areas shall be decorated with trellises / arbors and lighting features or with similar architectural elements. In addition, the common plaza area shall be decorated with pedestrian scale lighting and benches. · Pedestrian connection/ access shall be provided along the northerly property line between the project site and the adjacent church property. . A reciprocal access easement allowing such access shall be recorded on the property. . The two detached units along N. Stelling Road shall be attached. 9. REALIGNMENT OF STREET CURB Revised curb plan shall reflect the realignment of the existing curb (straightening and extend northerly and terminating prior to the adjacent church driveway) along the project frontage in order to facilitate a new detached park strip thereby enhancing the pedestrian experience with new street trees and landscaping area with double rows of street trees. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to final map approval. 10. NOISE MITIGATION To meet the City of Cupertino residential noise criteria, the following design measures must be met: · Windows: windows in units adjacent to and with a view of 1-280 shall have STC (Sound Transmission Class) of at least 33 dB. Special acoustical windows, with larger air spaces between panes, or with a thin plastic laminate layer between glass layers, can be obtained with STC ratings of 33-38 STC. A STC rating of 29- 30 would be acceptable tor units located away from 1-280. High quality double- glazed thermal window, with two 1/8" lights separated by a 3/8" to =}i" air space, and good weather seals if openable, have ratings of 27-30 STC. . Party Wall Assemblies: for minimizing noise transmitted between attached residential units, the party wall assembly should have several inches of air space, fiberglass insulation and minimal structural connections, and generally resilient channel (RC) attached to one side of the party wall, in order to meet the 50 STC requirements. In addition, any fire stop between units should not provide a strong structural connection. That is, they should be of light weight material, such as sheet metal or fiberglass that cannot conduct low frequency sound and vibration between units. 13-13 Resolution No. 6473 Page 4 U-2006-13 June 26, 2007 · Exterior Doors: Entrance doors and sliding glass doors should meet an STC rating of at least 25-27 dB. · Ventilation: All units must have a ventilation system that provides a habitable interior environment with the windows closed, regardless of outside temperature. · An eight-foot sound wall shall be erected along the entire southerly and westerly property line. Detailed noise mitigation program shall be submitted for review and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 11. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Per the City's Below Market Rate (BMR) requirements, 15% of the new units are required to be allocated as BMR units. Based upon a total of 20 new residential units, the BMR requirement for the project is 3 units. 12. TREE PRESERV AnON The recommendations of the City Consulting Arborist in his report dated April 17, 2007 and his email dated May 19, 2007 shall be followed. Prior to construction, the City Consulting Arborist shall review and sign off all of the protection measures. A letter from the City Consulting Arborist shall be provided confirming that all of the protected and new trees are in good standing prior to final occupancy. A tree bond in the amount of $30,000 shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of any building permits to ensure the preservation of the three specimen Oaks on the project site. In the event that a protected tree must be removed or dies during construction, the Director of Community Development has the discretion to approve replacement trees or forward to the Planning Commission for additional review. 13. FINAL BUILDING MATERIAL AND COLOR The final bUilding material and color (along with other site and architectural enhancements described in the above conditions) shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. 14. GREEN BUILDING MEASURES The applicant shall submit a green building design program to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Green building design principles shall be incorporated into the project to the maximum extent possible. At the minimum, the project shall satisfy the following measures · The project shall use tankless water heaters through out the project. Tankless water heaters are 20 to 30% more efficient than traditional water heaters. · The project shall use gas furnaces that have minimum efficiency ratings of 80%. or equivalent. · The applicant shall design the roofs of all residential units to be able to structurally facilitate future solar panel systems to account for the weight and 13 - 14 Resolution No. 6473 Page 5 U-2006-13 June 26, 2007 wind loading factors. Final roof plans shall be. reviewed. and approved by the Building Official. . Non-formaldehyde building insulation shall be used through out the project. . Lighter shades of roofing colors shall be used throughout the project in order to help reflect sunlight and to achieve cooler roof temperatures. SECTION IV: CONDmONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEP ARTMENf. 15. STREET WIDENING Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required. by the City Engineer. 16. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related. structures shall be installed. in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 17. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located.. . 17a TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. 18. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted. within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type approved. by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. 19. GRADING Grading shall be as approved. and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 20. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre and Post-development calculations must be provided to identify if storm drain facilities need to be constructed or renovated. 21. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City. 22. UNDERGROUND UTlLmES The developer shall comply with. the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utilitytdevices. Ordinance No. 331 re uires all overhead lines to be under ound whether the lines are new or existing. The developer shall submit detailed plans showin Resolution No. 6473 Page 6 U-2006-13 June 26, 2007 underground provisions. Said .plans shall be subject to prior approval of the. affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 23. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment. of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees. for undergrounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fee Permit: Greater of $3,540.00 min. or 6% of Imp.Cost b. Grading Permit: Greater of $2,060.00 min. or 6% of Imp.Cost c. Development Maintenance Deposit $ 3,000.00 d. Storm Drainage Fee: $ 1,419.00 e. Power Cost: *.. f. Map Checking Fees: $ 6,750.00 g. Park Fees: $ 153,000.00 Bonds: a. On & Off-Site Improvements Bond: 100% Labor/Material Bond, 100% Performance Bond -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. ** Developer is required for one-year power cost for streetlights 24. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. 25. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must file for a NOI (Notice of Intent) and must prepare a Storm Water. Pollution Prevention Plan with the State Water Resources Control Board. The city must obtain documentation that the process has been completed. For copies of the Construction General Permit, the NOI and additional permit information. consult the state Water Resources Control Board web site at: http:/ www.swrcb.ca.gov / stormwtr / construction.hb:nl 26. AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REOUlREMENTS a. Permanent Stormwater Quality BMPs Required In accordance with chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the City Code, all development and redevelopment projects ~an6 Resolution No. 6473 Page 7 U-2006-13 June 26, 2007 include permanent BMPs in order to reduce the water quality impacts of stormwater runoff from the entire site for the life of the project. b. Stormwater Management Plan Required The applicant shall submit a Starmwater Management Plan far this project. The permanent storm water quality best management practices (BMPs) included in this plan shall be selected and designed in accordance with chapter 9.18, Starmwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the City Code. c. BMP Agreements The applicant and the City shall enter into a recorded agreement and covenant running with the land for perpetual BMP maintenance by the property owners(s). In addition, the owner(s) and the Gty shall enter into a recorded easement agreement and covenant running with the land allowing City access at the site for BJ.\.1P inspection. 27. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The applicant will be required to maintain all items, which are non-standard within the City's right of way. The applicant and the City must enter into a recorded agreement for this aforementioned work. 28. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS The developer must comply Refuge Truck access radius requirements throughout the proposed subject development. . Trash and recycling cart locations shall be identified on-site during homeowners use as well as for pick~p situations. 29. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) will be required to determine mitigation and fees as a result of this development. Once the study has been completed, the traffic department will provide additional comments towards the project. . Improvements to traffic signals; bicycle, pedestrian and vehicular facilities maybe included as requirements. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of June 2007, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: c;o:r'v1MISSIONERS: Chairperson Giefer, Vice Chair Chien, Miller, Kaneda CO:M:MlSSIONERS: Wong COMMISSIONERS: none COMMISSIONERS: none A TIEST: APPROVED: Is/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development F: \PDREPORT\RES \2006\ U-2006-13 res.9.oc Is/Usa Giefer Lisa Giefer, Chairperson Planning Commission 13 - 17 ASA-2006-22 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6474 OF THE PLANNING COM1vfiSSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO. RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR 20 NEW ATACHED AND DETACHED RESIDENTIAL UNITS --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- SECTIONI: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application . for an Architectural and Site Approval, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Architectural and Site Approval is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconc1usions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. ASA-2006-22 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 26, 2007, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 13-18 Resolution No. 6474 Page 2 ASA-2006-22 June 26, 2007 . Application No.: Applicant: Location: ~CTIONn:PROffiCTD~RIPTmN ASA-2006-22 Lawrence Guy 10855 N. Stelling Road SECTION ill: CONDmONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. L APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits by the Dahlin Group, titled.Las Palmas, 10855 N. Stelling Road for Los Gatos Trade Line Corp. Single Family and Townhouse, dated May 10, 2007, .consisting of 16 sheets, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to construct 10 small lot single-family homes and 10 attached town homes on 20 residential parcels with one common parcel. The project parcel is also approved to be rezoned from BQ to P(RES). The final zoning plat map shall be revised to reflect the zoning area to the center of the street. 3. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit a comprehensive landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development to provide the following: a. Tree replacement strategies ensuring that the appropriate number, specie and size of mitigation trees are provided at the appropriate locations per the City Arborist's recommendations. b. _ Tree preservation measures per the City Arborist's recommendations. c. More screen trees along the southerly property line; d. New street trees in the new park strip area in front of the project property; e. BiD-swales along the southerly property line to the maximum extent possible. f. Plant vines on and through the sound wall to discourage graffiti. 4. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN A comprehensive construction operation plan must be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of grading and building permits addressing the following: ~ Staging area ~ Tree protection ~ Construction hours and limits ~ Construction vehicle and truck routes ~ Dust and erosion control ~ Garbage and debris container location and pick up schedule ~ Si8"'lage adVising contractors of the restrictions ~ Construction equipment and construction vehicle parking locations \ 13 - 19 Resolution No. 6474 Page 3 ASA-2006-22 June 26, 2007 5. BUILDING MATERIAL RECYCLING The applicant shall show proof that all of the existing building materials are recycled to the maximum extent possible. Proof of recycling shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final occupancy. 6. HISTORIC PRESERVATION · The applicant shall use elements from the existing home to construct a trellis or gazebo structure at the cOIrunon plaza area. · The applicant is required to work with a professional building salvage company (i.e., Whole House of Palo Alto) to salvage and reuse as much of the existing home as possible. 7. PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ENHANCEMENTS The applicant shall contribute $25,000 for enhancements to the pedestrian walkway along the west side of the N. Stelling Road bridge that crosses over ,Interstate 280 located south of the project site. The city shall use the money to add pedestrian scaled lighting, paving materials, railings and/ or repainting of the pedestrian facilities of the west side of the bridge. 8. SITE ACCESS AND ARCHITECTURAL ENHANCEMENTS · The cQrnmon entry points to the court yard areas shall be decorated with trellises/arbors and lighting features or with similar architectural elements. In addition, the common plaza area shall be decorated with pedestrian scale lighting and benches. · Pedestrian connection/ access shall be provided along the northerly property line between the project site and the adjacent church property. A reciprocal access easement allowing such access shall be recorded on the property. · The two detached units along N. Stelling Road shall be attached. 9. REALIGNMENT OF STREET CURB Revised curb plan shall reflect the realignment of the existing curb (straightening and extend northerly and terminating prior to the adjacent church driveway) along the project frontage in order to facilitate a new detached park strip thereby enhancing the pedestrian experience with new street trees and landscaping area with double rows of street trees. The pla.ns shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to final map approval. 10. NOISE MITIGATION To meet the City of Cupertino residential noise criteria, the following design measures must be met: . Windows: windows in units adjacent to and with a view of 1-280 shall have STC (Sound Transmission Class) of at least 33 dB. Special acoustical windows, with larger air spaces between panes, or with a thin plastic laminate layer between glass layers, can be obtained with STC ratings of 33-38 STC. A STC rating of 29- 30 would be acceptable for units located away from 1-280. High quality double- glazed thermal window, with two 1/8" lights separated by a 3/8" to %" air space, and good weather seals if openable, have ratings of 27-30 STC. 1 3 - 20 Resolution No. 6474 Page 4 ASA-2006-22 June 26, 2007 · Party Wall Assemblies: for minimizing noise tranSmitted between attached residential units, the party wall assembly should have several inches of air space, fiberglass insulation and minimal structural connections, and generally resilient channel (RC) attached to one side of the party wall, in order to meet the 50 STC requirements. In addition, any fire stop between units should not provide a strong structural connection. That is, they should be of light weight material, . such as sheet metal or fiberglass that cannot conduct low frequency sound and vibration between unitS. · Exterior Doors: Entrance doors and sliding glass doors should meet an STC rating of at least 25-27 dB. · Ventilation: All units must have a ventilation system that provides a habitable interior environment.with the windows closed, regardless of outside temperature. · An eight-foot sound wall shall be erected along the entire southerly and westerly property line. Detailed noise mitigation program shall be submitted for review and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 11. AFFORDABLE HOUSING. Per the City's Below Market Rate (BMR) requirements, 15% of the new units are required to be allocated as BMR units. Based upon a total of 20 new residential units, the BMR requirement for the project is 3 units. 12. TREE PRESERV AnON. The recommendations of the City Consulting Arborist in his report dated April 17, 2007 and his email dated May 19, 2007 shall be followed. Prior to construction, the City Consulting Arborist shall review and sign off all of the protection measures. A letter from the City Consulting Arborist shall be provided confirming that all of the protected and new trees are in good standing prior to final occupancy. A tree bond in the amount of $30,000 shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of any building permits to ensure the preservation of the three specimen Oaks on the project site. In the event that a protected tree must be removed or rues during construction, the Director of Community Development has the discretion to approve replacement trees or forward to the Planning Corrunission for additional review_ 13. FINAL BUILDING MATERIAL AND COLOR The final building material and color (along with other site and architectural enhancements described in the above conditions) shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. 14. GREEN BUILDING MEASURES The applicant shall submit a green building design program to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Green building design principles shall be incorporated into the project to the maximum extent possible. At the minimum, the project shall satisfy the folloWing measures 13 - 21 Resolution No. 6474 Page 5 ASA-2006-22 June 26, 2007 . The project shall use tanIdess water heaters through out the project. Tankless water heaters are 20 to 30% more efficient than traditional water heaters. . The project shall use gas furnaces that have minimum efficiency ratings of 80% or equivalent. . The applicant shall design the roofs of all residential units to be able to structurally facilitate future solar panel systems to account for the weight and wind loading factors. Final roof plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Official . Non-formaldehyde building insulation shall be used through outthe project . Lighter shades of roofing colors shall be used throughout the project in order to help reflect sunlight and to achieve cooler roof temperatures. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of June 2007, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll ~~~ . AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Giefer, Vice Chair Chien, Miller, Kaneda COMMISSIONERS: Wong COMMISSIONERS: none COMMISSIONERS: none ATIEST: APPROVED: IslSteve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development IslLisa Giefer Lisa Giefer, Chair Planning Commission G: \Planning \PDREPORT\RES\2006\ASA-2006-22.doc 13 - 22 ORDINANCE 07..2007 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO REZONING 1.1 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10855 N. STELLING ROAD FROM BQ (QUASI-PUBLIC) TO P-RES (pLANNED RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT APPLICATION Z-2006-05 WHEREAS, an application was received by the City (Application No. Z-2006-05) for the rezoning of property located at 10855 N. Stelling Road to rezone 1.1 acres from BQ (Quasi- Public) to P-Res (planning Residential) Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the rezoning is consistent with the City's general plan land use map, proposed uses and surrounding uses; and . WHEREAS, upon due notice and after one public hearing the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the rezoning be granted; and WHEREAS, a map of the subject property is attached hereto as Exhibit A as a proposed amendment to the Master Zoning Map ofthe City of Cupertino, NOW, THEREFORE, BElT ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the property described in attached Exhibit A is hereby rezoned to P(RES) ; and is made part of the Master Zoning Map of the City of Cupertino. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after its passage. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the 17th day of July 2007, and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the ~ day of ,2007, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino G:\Planning\ORD\Z-2006-05.doc 1 3 - 23 ~ := .a ~ N. STELLING ROAD N 07TJ2'SO- E 790.S7' -CENTfRUNr/ l S 88'57'10. E A=O.126:t AC . 1 ~ 25.00' 92 (}9' , N 01.02,lU- L'DO. ' s08'51J!.!. -----r---- I PG&E EASEMENT I (6801 OR 474) (8148 OR 608) I I I I ~ I ~ I - I Io.l '- I ~ ~ \ I~ ~= I Ct) ei ~ I I ~~-1 )..~ I ~~ I C'i \ ~ I I ~ \ ~ I ,: \ ,~ I ~ I ~ I I 1J8"57'10~ 41.00' I. J'-. C\-1 o Zl [L,J'-. <1:0 I LO N \D ~ ~I . ~I ; .Ct) I I L__ APN 326-07-037 A=I.105:t AC -- N 00'52'JO- E 155.00' S 07."9'35- W 42.6'" lJiIC /IIJE: f:\_\45I.Hds ~\_\45M-Zdllilg PIDI-07tIXJl.drtg. IJSr EDfIFD: T.... Ju/ 10. 201)7 4:. ~ ~m, AutoCod V.Il.'. (IJIS roell). lJiauIOf/ ....... NT""'" !ol (1IiJ6) LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS PROPERTY liNE - SUBJECT PARCEL PROPERTY liNE - ADJACENT PARCEL MONUMENT LINE I CENTERUNf, AS NOTED EASEMENT UNE / l1E LINE AREA TABULATION ~ 0:::: LLl )--. W<( oS: o::::t] LLI 0:::: [L,h... -,.., Z :) ~ AREA NET AREA GROSS ZONING fX/Sl1NG ZONING PROPOSED ZONING 1.705:t AC 1.2JI:1: AC 8Q, QUASJ-PUBUC BtJIl.DING P-RES, PLANNED RfSIDfNTW.. ~ =t o I 25' 50' I I 100' I SCALE: 1 N = 50' ZONING PLAT MAP ]MH WEISS~ INC. Cl.MI "~;'n~; ~~. 7~ San J~t Ca 80113 (4OlI) 2U-4565 FAl(,(4OfIJ 286-45Sl1 www.jmhwlill.com SHEET I of 1 JOB 4583 . ~iltit II CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: U-2006-13, ASA-2006-22, TM-2007-02, Z-2006-05 Agenda Date: June 26, 2007 Applicant: Larry Guy Owner: Douglas Russum Location: 10855 N. Stelling Road APPLICATION SUMMARY: Use Permit to construct 20 single-family residential units (10 detached and 10 attached) on a 1.1-acre site (northwest comer of N. Stelling and 1-280). Architectural and Site approval to construct 10 small lot single-family residential homes and 10 attached town homes. Tentative Map to subdivide a 1.1-acre parcel int020 parcels and one common parcel. Re-zoning of a 1.1-acre parcel from BQ (Quasi-Public) to P-Res (Planned Residential) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. Recommend approval of U-2006-13, ASA-2006-22, TM-2007-02 and Z-2006-o5 subject to the model resolutions: Project Data: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Site Area: Density: High Density Residential (20-35 d.u./acre) BQ (Quasi-Public) 48,044 square feet (1.1-acre) 16.1 dwelling unit per acre Environmental Assessment: Categorically Exempt BACKGROUND: The applicant, Larry Guy, is requesting approval to construct 20 residential homes (10 small lot single-family and 10 attached town homes) on an existing parcel located at 10855 N. Stelling Road at the northwest comer of N. Stelling Road and 1-280. The project site is'approximately 1.1 acres (net) and consists of one single family home, one large detached building and several accessory structures. The project proposes the following project details: 13 - 25 Applications: U-2OO6-13, ASA-2006-22 1M-2007-02, Z-2OO6-D5 Las Palmas June 26, 2007 Page 2 RESIDEN llAL JJI~NSITY .:\1 AX. Parking COMMENTS T' . L "1 I HT. Count \...mts Inl 5 acre reet # of Spaces 20 (10 detached and 10 attached) 16.1 35 to 38 Covered: 40 Open: 14 Street: 2 Total: 56 Since the proposed zoning is Planned Residential and the project site is not located in any specific plan areas, there are no specific maximum height and minimum setback requirements. , "";~"'''''-M.'_'~'''''''''''~'h~''~:X'';'';';'v.:~::#:'<;' ""'- Project Aerial 13 - 26 2 Applications: U-2006-13, ASA-2oo6-22 TM-2007-D2, Z-2006-05 Las Palmas June 26, 2007 Page 3 DISCUSSION General Issues: Rezoning The project site is currently zoned BQ - Quasi Public even though it has been used as a single-family residential lot. The new zoning proposed for the project site is P(Res}- Planned Development Residential to allow the new 20 unit residential project. General Plan Density The proposed rezoning is compatible with the General Plan (high density residential) land use designation. The specified density range for this parcel is between 20 - 35 d.u./ acre and the project proposes 16 d.u./ acre, which is under the minimum range. The General Plan residential density indicates the desired development intensity for different areas of the City. However, the actual gross density may vary if the proposed project reflects the general development character of the neighboring properties (GP Policy 2-28). The project can not reasonably match the development character of the neighboring properties as it is surrounded by a church to the north & west, 1-280 to the south, and Villa Serra apartment project to the east, separated by Stelling Road. In addition, due to physical constraints of the project site (Le., the size of the property and the locations of existing protected trees, proximity to 1-280, lack of area for parking . spaces), the proposed lower density allows for a better site design and project. More units may compromise the livability and desirability of the project. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission allow the requested project density. Historic Preservation On May 5, 1997, the City Council appointed five Cupertino residents to the Historic Research Committee charged with researching 32 potential historic sites. TIle report was completed but at the time the City Council did not direct any further actions and preservation ordinance was developed. Therefore, the 1997 historic report generated by the Historic Research Committee is considered informational only. The proposed project site (a.k.a. Tracy House - see. exhibit A) is listed on the 1997 historic report and was ranked 16 out of 32 iD. terms of overall historic value. Even so, the site was recommended as historic mainly because of the desire to honor Enoch Pertish, an early designer and builder (late 1800s to earlier 1900s) who may have been connected in building and moving the existing residence to the project site. According to Sharon Hoyt, a historic researcher with the Cupertino Historic Society, the existing Tracy house was probably built in the 1890s. It was originally located on Lawrence Road and later moved to its current location on N. Stelling Road ll11937. Even though the existing residence was built by a reputable builder, the home does not take on any coherent or significant architectural styles. It has a blend of Victorian style, Ionian style, Tudor style and Craftsman style. In addition, a portion of the original house was moved to its current location. The home is in failing condition and both the applicant's architect and the City's consulting architect have confirmed that there is not any significant architectural value that warrants its preservation or relocation. 13 - 27 3 Applications: U-2006-13, ASA-2006-22 TM-2007-D2, Z-2006-05 Las Palmas June 26, 2007 Page 4 13 - 28 Applications: U-2006-13, ASA-2oo6-22 TM-2007-o2, Z-2006-DS LasPalmas June 26, 2007 Page 5 The proposed project attempts to mimic some of the architectural style of the existing residence by introducing different architectural treatments (Victorian, Ionian, Tudor and craftsman) on each of the units. " ".." tal.O<...... '0'''' ~5 -, """"""""'. l!llOI" .......... lNTt _1 tDCiI.,.., COtOl~t lOOf-l ioaf.J __J ~i ....., tDi.tJts::MD/rf-l 'O"f! ......... ...., COlOI~' _. -...c. Staff recommends the following be done to honor Enoch Perrish, the builder of the home: 1. A memorial plaque shall be erected in the proposed common plaza area where the history the existing residence would be available for public recognition. 2. The applicant shall use elements from the existing home to construct a trellis or gazebo structure at the common plaza area. 3. The applicant is required to work with a professional building salvage company to salvage and reuse as much of the existing home as possible. Tentative Map The applicant proposes subdividing the existing parcel into 21 parcels (with one common parcel that facilitates the driveways and common open space. Technical Issues: Site and Architecture Currently the site is accessed by one driveway off of N. Stelling Road located close to the northeast comer of the site that serves the existing residential home. The entry driveway to the proposed project will still be from N. Stelling Road but will be located close to the middle of the project frontage in order to minimize any potential vehicular conflicts with the adjacent church driveway located further north. TIlere is little landscaping opportunity throughout the site except along the perimeter of the project site. An approximately 2,500 sq. ft. public plaza and outdoor open space is proposed at 1 3 - 29 5 Applications: U-2006-13, ASA-2006-22 lM-2007-DZ,2-2006-05 Las Palmas June 26, 2007 Page 6 the end of the entry drive along the rear (westerly) property line creating a focal point for the project. Permeable decorative pavers are used throughout the entire interior driveway system to enhance onsite permeability and aesthetic qualities. The proposed preliminary architecture was reviewed by the City Consulting Architect and the applicant has incorporated all of changes and enhancements recommended by the City Architect. Staff recommends that the final color and building materials (including but not limited to pedestrian/building/parking lot lightings, patio railings, trellis materials, outdoor furniture, siding materials, common gateway features or any other similar exterior decorative features) be of high quality and shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. In addition, staff recommends the following enhancements to the project: · Additional "screen trees should be located along the southerly boundary of the project to the maximum extent possible to mitigate any potential visual and noise impacts from 1-280. · Pedestrian connection/ access should be provided along the northerly property line between the project site and the adjacent church property. . The applicant shall work with staff to lower the front entry porches and entry stair of unit type 1 so that the entry feature and the front porches are at a pedestrian level. . The common entry points to the court yard areas shall be decorated with trellises and lighting features or with similar architectural elements. In addition, the common plaza area shall be decorated with pedestrian scale lighting and benches. . Bio-swales should be introduced wherever possible along the southerly property boundary. · The curb alignment along the project frontage shou1d be adjusted to allow for a new detached sidewalk with additional street trees planted in front of the project. . Plant vines on and through the sound wall to discourage graffiti. 13 - 30 6 Applications: U-2006-13, ASA.2006-22 TM-2007-D2, Z-2006-0S Las Palmas June 26, 2007 Page 7 Front view from Stelling Road View of the detached units along the west property boundary with the common plaza 13 - 31 7 Applications: U-2OO6-13, ASA-2006-22 lM-2007-02,2-2oo6-05 Las Palmas June 26, 2007 Page 8 Parki1ti The City Municipal Code requires 2 enclosed spaces and .8 open spaces per each small lot single family unit or town homes proposed. Based on this ratio, the project is required to provide 56 spaces (40 enclosed and 16 open). Two of the open spaces are located on N. Stelling Road along the property's frontage. In several previous projects, the City has allowed off-site street parking to be used by the project to satiSfy parking requirements. In those circumstances, either the specific plan of the area prescribes for such parking credit or when there is an identified public benefit associated with the application. Staff recommends the following public benefits to justify the on-street parking requested: .:+ Realignment of the existing curb (straightening and extend northerly and terminating prior to the adjacent church driveway) along. the project frontage in order to facilitate a new detached park strip thereby enhancing the pedestrian experience with new street trees and landscaping area. .:. Contribution of $50,000 for enhancements to the pedestrian walkway along the west side of the N. Stelling Road bridge that crosses over Interstate 280 located south of the project site. The city shall use the money to add pedestrian scaled. lighting, paving materials, railings and/or repainting of the pedestrian facilities of the west side of the bridge. A similar requirement was recommended on the Villa Serra development on the east side of Stelling Rd. Traffic and Circulation A traffic and circulation analysis was prepared by Fehr & Peers dated April 24, 2007. It should be noted that at the time of the traffic analysis, the project consisted of 22 units and has since then been reduced to 20 units. The number of trips generated by the proposed project was estimated by applying trip rates from Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 7th Edition) to the size of the project. . The proposed project is estimated to generate 25 AM peak-hour trips (6 inbound/19 outbound) and 27 PM peak-hour trips (17 inbound/10 outbound). Two intersections were also reviewed for potential impacts (Homestead/Stelling & Stevens Creek/Stelling), and based on the small number of trips generated by the proposed project, operations at these two nearby intersections are not expected to substantially degrade. Noise A noise analysis was prepared by Environmental Consulting Services on Marth 8, 2007. The noise report presents results from the on-site monitoring, projection of future noise lev:els and a description of architectural details relevant to noise protection performance (see exhibit D). Based on the site noise measurements, anticipated future traffic volumes, and noise modeling, the worst case design noise level for the project residential unit would be 78 dBA (with the installation of a noise barrier on the south property line). To meet the City of Cupertino residential noise criteria, the following design measures must be met: 13 - 32 8 Applications: U-2006-13, ASA-2006-22 TM-2oo7-02, Z-2006-05 Las Palmas June 26, 2007 Page 9 .:. Windows: windows in wl.its adjacent to and with a view of 1-280 shall have STC (Sound Transmission Class) of at least 33 dB. Special acoustical windows, with larger air spaces between panes, or with a thin plastic laminate layer between glass layer.s, can be obtained with STC ratings of 33-38 STC. A STC rating of 29- 30 would be acceptable for units located away from 1-280. High quality double- glazed thermal window, with two 1/8" lights separated by a 3/8" to %" air space, and good wea~er seals if openable, have ratings of 27-30 STC. .:. Party Wall Assemblies: for minimizing noise transmitted between attached residential units, the party wall assembly should have several inches of air space, fiberglass insu1ation and minimal structural connections, and generally resilient channel (RC) attached to one side of the party wall, in order to meet the 50 STC requirement. In addition, any fire stop between units should not provide a strong structural connection. That is, they shou1d be of light weight material, such as sheet metal or fiberglass that cannot conduct low frequency sound and vibration between units. . .:. Exterior Doors: Entrance doors and sliding glass doors should meet an STC rating of at least 25-27 dB. .:. Ventilation: All units must have a ventilation system that provides a habitable interior environment with the windows closed, regardless of outside . temperature. .:. An eight-foot sound wall shall be erected along the entire southerly and westerly property line. Affordable Housing Per the City's Below Market Rate (BMR) requirements, 15% of the new units are required to be allocated as BMR units. Based upon a total of 20 new residential units, the BMR requirement for the project is 3 w1its. Tree Removal A total of 16 trees have been documented by the City Consulting Arborist on the project site, three of which are defined by the City Ordinance as specimen trees (Trees #1, 2, 6 - CO;1St Live Oak). The City Arborist has also identified approximately 57 additional less significant trees (fruit bearing, nut bearing and other various types) on the site that are not protected by fl:le Ordinance. The project proposes to remove 11 trees (#3,5,7-14 and 16) and relocate two (#4 and 6). Trees number 1 and 2 are required to be preserved. With the exception of trees #9 and #11 (dead poplar and pine structurally unsafe), all removed frees shall be replaced at a one-ta-one ratio with minimum 36-inch box size trees, which results in nine new trees. In the event if trees #1,2, 6 are lost as result of the construction, each trees shall be replaced with two minimum 48-inch box size replacement trees. The final landscaping 13 - 3'3 9 Applications: U-2006-13, ASA-2oo6-22 1M-2007-D2~ Z-2006-05 Las Palmas June 26, 2007 Page 10 plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of building permits. In addition, the City Consulting Arborist shall inspect all relevant tree protection measures prior to construction and inspect prior to final ocCupancy to verify that all the preserved trees are in good standing. . Student Generation The school attendance areas in which the proposed project would be located are: Garden Gate Elementary, Lawson Middle School and Homestead High School. Plans were sent to the Fremont Union High School District and the Cupertino Union School district for review and input. Only the Cupertino Union School District has confirmed that the project will not cause any significant impacts to the school system grades K thru 8th. The Fremont Union High School District has not responded with any comments. Staff attempted to contact the high school district representatives without success and assumes that the high school district has no comments on the project. Due to the size of the proposed project, it did not warrant a fiscal and enrollment impact analysis. However, based on the SGR (Student General Rate) from a previously approved similar town home project (Morley Brother, Pruneridge Avenue Development) in the City, the proposed project is expected to generate the following students: Total of Students Elementary (K-5) 0.25. SGR Middle (6-8) SGR Hi 11. School SGR 5 3 3 Total: 11 Students Environmental Review Staff determined that the project is categorically exempted from CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act). A categorical exemption is an exemption from CEQA for a class of projects that the Secretary of Resources determines generally will not have a significant effect on the surrounding environment. Based on Article 19, Section 15332, Class 32 in-fill development projects meeting the following criteria described below are exempted from CEQA: . 4. 1. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; 2. The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; 3. The project site has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; 10 13-34 Applications: U-2006-13, ASA-2oo6-22 lM-2007-02,2-2oo6.o5 LasPalmas June 26, 2007 Page 11 5. TIle site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The proposed residential project satisfies all of the above in-fill development criteria therefore exempt from any further environmental review. The Environmental Review Committee reviewed the project at its May 23, 2007 meeting and concurs with the above findings of exemption. Gl'een Buildin~ Design Due to the recent interest on the desire of adopting green building designs, the City is in the initial process of determining the scope and direction of the City's green building standards. In the interim, staff suggests the following simple measures be applied to the project: . TIle project shall use tankless water heaters through out the project. Tankless Water heaters are 20 to 30% more efficient than traditional water heaters. . The project shall use gas furnaces that have minimum efficiency ratings of 70%. Higher efficient furnaces on the market now can reach efficiency rating between 70% to 90%. . The applicant shall design the roofs of all residential units to be able to structurally facilitate future solar panel systems to account for the weight and wind loading factors. Final roof plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Building OfficiaL . Lighter shades of roofing colors shall be used throughout the project in order to help reflect sunlight and to achieve cooler roof temperatures. All of the above measures and facts have been verified in consultation with Davis Energy Company in Davis, CA, a company appointed by the US Green Building Council as the chief LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certifier in California on green building projects. Submitted by: Gary Chao, Senior Planner . c::::> . Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developm~ ENCLOSURES Model Resolutions Recommendation of the Environmental Review Committee Preliminary Zoning Plat Map Exhibit A: Cupertino Historic Report, 1997 Exhibit B: Traffic Analysis, Pehr and Peers, April 24, 2007 Exhibit C: Arborist Report, Arborist Resources, April 17, 2007 Exhibit D: Noise Study, Environmental Consulting Services, March 8, 2007 Colored Aerial Colored Site Plan Plan Set F:\PDREPORT\pcUreports \2006ureports \ U-2006-13, ASA~2006-22, TM-2007-02, z- 2006-05.doc 13 - 35 11 Z-2006-05 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 MODEL RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING THE RE-ZONING OF A 1.1 ACRE SITE FROM BQ (QUAS1- PUBUC) TO P(RES)- PLANNED RESIDENTIAL ZONE SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: Z-2006-05 Lawrence Guy 10855 N. Stelling Road SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR REZONING WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for the rezoning of property, as described on this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the subject rezoning meets the. following requirements: . . 1) That the rezoning is in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino. 2) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to conform to the new zoning designation. 3) That the new zoning encourages the most appropriate use of land. 4) That the proposed rezoning is otherwise not detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of subject parcels. 5) That the rezoning promotes the orderly development of the city. 13 - 36 Model Resolution Page 2 Z-2006-05 June 26, 2007 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, application no. Z-2006-OS is hereby recommended for approval; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this. Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application Z-2005-05, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 26, 2007 and are incorporated by reference herein. .SECTION III: CONDmONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of 'approval is based on Exhibits A: Zoning Plot Map/200S5/20065 De Palma Lane Cupertino, CA, Order No.: 0611002604-GJ, and Exhibit B: Zoning Plat Descriptions dated December 13, 2006, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. The final .plat map shall be revised to extend the zoning area to center line of the public street. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of June 2007, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, hy the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: . APPROVED: Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Lisa Giefer, Chair Cupertino Planning Commission . G:Planning/PDREPORT IResl 2006 I Z-2006-05 13 - 37 1M-2007 -02 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 MODEL RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CrlY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE A 1.1 ACRE PARCEL INTO 20 PARCELS AND CREATE ONE COMMON PARCEL SECTION 1: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 0) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan. 0) That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 0) That the site is physically suitable for the type of development. 0) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and unavoidable injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. 0) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated . therewith is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 0) That the design of the subdivision and its associated improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Tentative Subdivision Map is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this 13 - 38 Model Resolution Page 2 TM-2007-02 June 26, 2007 resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. TM-2oo7-02 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 26, 2007, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION TM-2007 -02 Lawrence Guy 10855 N. Stelling Raod Application No.: Applicant Location: SECTION III:. CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. O. APPROVED EXlllBITS The recommendation of approval-is based on Exhibits by the Dahlin Group, titled Las Palmas, 10855 N. Stelling Road for Los Gatos Trade Line Corp. Single Family and Townhouse, dated May 10, 2007, consisting of 16 sheets, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. o. PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT Applicant shall work with the City to record a public access easement over the sidewalks around the building, driveway to the south and the rear of the property and the parking areas. The agreement shall be recorded in conjunction with recordation of the final map, and shall be subject to prior approval as to form and content by the City Attorney. _ o. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVA'FIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90'-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If - you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, yo~ will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. o. CONFORMANCE WITH PRIOR APPROVALS The Director of Community Development shall confirm that the subdivided parcels conform to prior approvals for this site. 13 - 39 Model Resolution Page 3 . TM-2007-02 June 26, 2007 CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDmONS (Section 66474.18 of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 22046 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of June 2007, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the fo1l9wing roll call vote: AYES: NOPS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Steve Piasecki, Director Community Development Department Lisa Giefer, Chair Planning Commission G: \ Planning \ PDREPORT\ RES \2007\ TM-2007-02 res.doc 13 - 40 U-2006-13 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 MODEL RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT 20 ATTACHED AND DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY RFSIDENTIAL/TOWN HOME UNITS ON A 1.1 ACRE SITE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF STELLING ROAD AND 1-208 SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. U-2006-13 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 26, 2007, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: U-2006-13 Lawrence Guy 13-41 Model Resolution Page 2 U-2006-13 June 26, 2007 Location: 10855 N Stelling Raod SECTION III: CONDmONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHmITS The recommendation. of approval is based on Exhibits by the. Dahlin Group, titled Las Palmas, 10855 N. Stelling Road for Los Gatos Trade Line Corp. Single Family and Townhouse, dated May 10, 2007, consisting of 16 sheets, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to cons.truct 10 smaIl lot single-family homes and 10 attached town homes on 20 residential parcels with one common parcel. The project parcel is also approved to be rezoned from BQ to P(RES). The final zoning plat map shall be revised to reflect the zoning area to the center of the street. 3. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit a comprehensive landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development to provide the following: a. Tree replacement strategies ensuring that the appropriate number, specie and size of mitigation trees are provided a.t the appropriate locations per the City Arborist's recommendations. b. Tree preservation measures per the City Arborist's recommendations. c. More screen trees along the southerly property line; d. New street trees in the new park strip area in front of the project property; e. Bio":swales along the southerly property line to the maximum extent possible. f. Plant vine~ on and through the sound wall to discourage graffiti. 4. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN A comprehensive construction operation plan must be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of grading and building permits addressing the following: ~ Staging area ~ Tree protection ~ Construction hours and limits ~ Construction vehicle and truck routes ~ Dust and erosion control ~ Garbage and debris container location and pick up schedule ~ Signage advising contractors of the restrictions 13 - 42 Model Resolution Page 3 U-2006-13 June 26, 2007 ~ Construction equipment and construction vehicle parking locations\ 5. BUILDING MATERIAL RECYCLING The applicant shall show proof that all of the existing building materials are recycled to the maximum extent possible. Proof of recycling shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final occupancy. 6. HISTORIC PRESERVATION . A memorial plaque shall be erected in the proposed common plaza area where the history the existing residence would be available for public recognition. . The applicant shall use elements from the existing home to construct a trellis or gazebo structure at the common plaza area. . The applicant is required to work with a professional building salvage company (Le., Whole House of Palo Alto) to salvage and reuse as much of the existing home as possible. 7. PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ENHANCEMENTS The applicant shall contribute $50,000 for enhancements to the pedestrian walkway along the west side of the N. Stelling Road bridge that crosses over Interstate 280 located south of the project site. The city shall use the money to add pedestrian scaled lighting, paving materials, railings and/ or repainting of the pedestrian facilities of the west side of the bridge. 8. SITE ACCESS AND ARCHITECTURAL ENHANCEMENTS . The common entry points to the court yard areas shall be decorated with trellises/ arbors and lighting features or with similar architectural elements. In addition, the common plaza area shall be decorated with pedestrian scale lighting and benches. . Pedestrian connection/ access shall be provided along the northerly . property line between the project site and the adjacent church property. A reciprocal access easement allowing such access shall be recorded on the property. . 9. REALIGNMENT OF STREET CURB Revised curb plan shall reflect the realignment of the existing curb (straightening and extend northerly and terminating prior to the adjacent church driveway) along the project frontage in order to facilitate a new detached park strip thereby enhancing the pedestrian experience with new street trees and landscaping area. The plans shall be reyiewed and approved by the City prior to final map approval. 13 - 43 Model Resolution Page 4 U-2006-13 Jtu:le 26, 2007 10. NOISE MITIGATION To meet the City of Cupertino residential noise criteria, the following design . measures must be met: . Windows: windows in units adjacent to and with a view of 1..280 shall have STC (Sound Transmission Class) of at least 33 dB. Special acoustical windows, with larger air spaces between panes, or with a thin plastic laminate layer between glass layers, can be obtained with STC ratings of 33-38 STC. A STC rating of 29-30 would be acceptable for units located away from 1-280. High quality double-glazed thermal window, with two 1/8" lights separated by a 3/8" to %" air space, and good weather seals if , openable, have ratings of 27-30 STC. . Party Wall Assemblies: for minimizing noise transmitted between attached residential units, the party wall assembly should have several inches of air space, fiberglass insu1ation and minimal structural connections, and generally resilient channel (RC) attached to one side of the party wall, in order to meet the 50 STC requirement. In addition, any fire stop between units should not provide a strong structural connection. That is, they shou1d be of light weight material, such as sheet metal or fiberglass that cannot conduct low frequency sound and vibration between units. . Exterior Doors: Entrance doors and sliding glass doors should meet an STC rating of at least 25-27 dB. . Ventilation: All units must have a ventilation system that provides a habitable interior environment with the windows closed, regardless of outside temperature. . An eight.,foot sound wall shall be erected along the entire southerly and westerly property line. Detailed noise mitigation program shall be submitted for review and ap.proved prior to issuam;:e of building permits. 11. AFFORDABLE HOUSING Per the City's Below Market Rate (BMR) requirements, 15% of the new units are required to be allocated as BMR units. Based upon a total of 20 new residential units, the BMR requirement for the project is 3 units. 12. TREE PRESERVATION The recommendations of the City Consulting Arborist in his report dated April . 17,2007 and his email dated May 19, 2007 shall be followed. Prior to construction, the City Consulting Arborist shall review and sign off all of the 13-44 Model Resolution Page 5 U-2oo6-13 June 26, 2007 protection measures. A letter from the City Consu1ting Arborist shall be provided confirming that all of the protected and new trees are in good standing prior to final occupancy. In the event that a protected tree must be removed or dies during construction, the Director of Community Develppment has the discretion to approve replacement trees or forward to the Planning Commission for additional review. . 13. FINAL BUILDING MATERIAL AND COLOR The final building material and color (along with other site and architectural enhancements described in the above conditions) shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. 14. GREEN BUILDING MEASURES The applicant shall submit a green building design program to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Green building design principles shall be incorporated into the project to the maximum extent possible. At the minimum, the project shall satisfy the following measures . The project shall use tankless water heaters through out the project. Tankless water heaters are 20 to 30% more efficient than traditional water heaters. . The project shall use gas furnaces that have minimum efficiency ratings of 70%. Higher efficient furnaces on the market now can reach efficiency rating between 70% to 90%. . The applicant shall design the roofs of all residential units to be able to structurally facilitate future solar panel systems to account for the weight and wind}oading factors. Pinal roof plans shall be reviewed a,nd approved by the Building OfficiaL . . Lighter shades of roofing colors shall be used throughout the project in order to help reflect sunlight and to achieve cooler roof temperatures. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBUC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 15. STREET WIDENING Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 16. CURB AND GUTIER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed In accordance with grades and standards as specified br the City Engineer. 17. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION 13 - 45 Model Resolution . Page 6 U-2oo6-13 June 26, 2007 Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other fornis of viSual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 17. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. 18. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. 19. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/ or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 20. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre and Post-development calculations must be provided to identify if storm drain facilities need to be constructed or renovated. 21.. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval. of the City. 22. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate. with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. Ordinance No. 331 requires all overhead lines to be underground whether the lines are new or existing. The developer shall submit detailed. plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 23. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. . Fees: '13 -46 Model Resolution Page 7 U-2006-13 June 26, 2007 a. Checking & Inspection Fee Permit: Greater of $3,540.00 min. or 6% of Imp.Cost b. Grading Permit Greater of $2,060.00 min. or 6% of Imp.Cost c. Development Maintenance Deposit .$ 3,000.00 d. Storm Drainage Fee: $ 1,419.00 e. Power Cost: ** f. Map Checking Fees: $ 6,750.00 g. Park Fees: $153,000.00 Bonds: a. On & Off-Site Improvements Bond: 100% Labor/Material Bond, 100% Performance Bond -The fees descnbed above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. ** Developer is required for one-year power cost for streetlights 24. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. 25. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT The applicant must file for a NOl (Notice of Intent) and must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan with the State Water Resources Control Board. The city must obtain documentation that the process has been completed. For copies of the Construction General Permit, the NOI and additional permit information consult the state Water Resources Control Board web site at: http:/ www.swrcb.ca.gov / stormwtr / construction.html 26; AMENDED DEVELOPMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) REQUIREMENTS a. Permanent Stormwater Quality BMPs Required In accordance with chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the City Code, all development and redevelopment projects shall include permanent BMPs in order to reduce the water quality impacts of stormwater runoff from the entire site for the life of the project. 13 - 47 Model Resolution Page 8 U-2006-13 June 26, 2007 b. Stormwater Management Plan Required The applicant shall submit a Stormwater Management Plan for this project. The permanent storm water quality best management practices (BMPs) included in this plan shall be selected and designed iri. accordance with chapter . 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the City Code. c. . BMP Agreements The applicant and the City shall enter into a recorded agreement and covenant running with the land for perpetual BMP maintenance by the property owners(s). In addition, the owner(s) and the City shall enter into a recorded easement agreement and covenant rurining with the land allowing City access at the site for BMP inspection. 27. MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The applicant will be required to maintain all items, which are non-standard within the City's right of way. The applicant and the City must enter into a recorded agreement for this aforementioned work. 28. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS The developer must comply Refuge Truck access radius requirementS throughout the proposed subject development. Trash and recycling cart locations shall be identified on-site during homeowners use as well as for pickup situations. 29. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) will be required to determine mitigation and fees as a result of this development. Once the study has been completed, the traffic department will provide additional comments towards the project. Improvements to traffic signals; bicycle, pedestrian and vehicular facilities maybe included as requirements. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of. June 2007, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: . AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: A ITEST: APPROVED: 13 - 48 Model Resolution Page 9 U-2oo6-13 June 26,2007 Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Lisa Giefer, Chairperson Planning Commission 1 3 - 49 ASA-2oo6-22 OTY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 MODEL RFSOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR 22 NEW ATACHED AND DETACHED RESIDENTIAL UNITS =====~~=~==~==~========================~================~;===== SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the viCinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Architectural and Site Approval is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginniri.g on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. ASA-2006-22 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 26, 2007, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 13 - 50 Model Resolution Page 2 ASA-2006-22 June 26, 2007 SECTION ll: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: ASA-2006-22 Lawrence Guy 10855 N. Stelling Road SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY . DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits by the Dahlin Group, titled Las Palmas, 10855 N. Stelling Road for Los Gatos Trade Line Corp. Single Family and Townhouse, dated May 10, 2007, consisting of 16 sheets, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit a comprehensive landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development to provide the following: a. Tree replacement strategies ensuring that the appropriate number, specie and size of mitigation trees are provided at the appropriate locations per the City Arborist's recommendations. . b. Tree preservation measures per the City Arborist's recommendations. c. More screen trees along the southerly property line; d. New street trees in the new park strip area in front of the project property; e. Bio-swales along the southerly property line to the maximum extent possible. f. Plant vines on and through the sound wall to discourage graffiti. 3. BUILDING MATERIAL RECYCLING The applicant shall show proof that all of the existing building materials are recycled to the maximum extent possible. Proof of recycling shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final occupancy. 4. HISTORIC PRESERVATION . A memorial plaque shall be erected in the proposed common plaza area where the history the existing residence would be available for public recognition. . The applicant shall use elements from the existing home to construct a b."ellis or gazebo structure at the common plaza area. 13 - 51 Model Resolution Page 3 ASA-2006-22 June 26, 2007 · The applicant is required to work with a professional building salvage company (i.e., Whole House of Palo Alto) to salvage and reuse as much of the existing home as possible. 5. PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ENHANCEMENTS The applicant shall contribute $50,000 for enhancements to the pedestrian walkway along the west side of the N. Stelling Road bridge that crosses over Interstate 280 located south of the project site. The city shall use the money to add pedestrian scaled lighting, paving materials, railings and/ or repainting of the pedestrian facilities of the west side of the bridge. 6. SITE ACCESS AND ARCHITECTURAL ENHANCEMENTS · The common entry points to the court yard areas shall be decorated with trellises/ arbors and lighting features or with similar architectural elements. In addition, the common plaza area shall be decorated with pedestrian scale lighting and benches. . · Pedestrian connection/ access shall be provided along the northerly property line between the project site and the adjacent church property. A reciprocal access easement allowing such access shall be recorded on the property. . 7. REALIGNMENT OF STREET CURB Revised curb plan shall reflect the realignment of the existing curb (straightening and extend northerly and terminating prior to the adjacent church driveway) along the project frontage in order to facilitate a new detached park strip thereby enhancing the pedestrian experience with new street trees and landscaping area. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to final map approval. 8. NOISE MITIGATION To meet the City of Cupertino residential noise criteria, the following design . measures must be met: · Windows: windows in units adjacent to and with a view of 1-280 shall have STC (Sound Transmission Class) of at least 33 dB. Special acoustical windows, with larger air spaces between panes, or with a thin plastic laminate layer between glass layers, can be obtained with STC ratings of 33-38 STC. A STC rating of 29-30 would be acceptable for units located away from 1-280. High quality double-glazed thermal window, with two 1/8" lights separated by a 3/8" to %" air space, and good weather seals if openable, have ratings of 27-30 STC. · Party Wall Assemblies: for minimizing noise transmitted between attached residential units, the party wall assembly should have several inches of air space, fiberglass insulation and minimal structural 13 - 52 Model Resolution Page 4 ASA-2006-22 June 26, 2007 connections, and generally resilient channel (Rq attached to one side of . the party wall, in order to meet the 50 STC requirement. In addition, any fire stop between units should not provide a strong structural connection. That is, they should be of light weight material, such as sheet metal or fiberglass that cannot conduct low frequency sound and vibration between umts. · Exterior Doors: Entrance doors and sliding glass doors shou1d meet an STC rating of at least 25-27 dB. · Ventilation: All units must have a ventilation system that provides a habitable interior environment with the windows closed, regardless of outside temperature. · An eight-foot sound wall shall be erected along the entire southerly and westerly property line.. Detailed noise mitigation program shall be submitted for review and approved prior to issuance of building permits. . 9. TREE PRESERVATION The recommendations of the City Cons~ting Arborist in his report dated April 17,2907 and his email dated May 19, 2007 shall be followed. Prior to construction, the City Consu1ting Arborist shall review and sign off all of the protection measures. A letter from the City Consulting Arborist shall be provided confirming that all of the protected and new trees are in good standing prior to final occupancy. In the event that a protected tree must be removed or dies during construction, the Director of Community Development has the discretion to approve replacement trees or forward to the Planning Commission for additional review. 10. FINAL BUILDING MATERIAL AND COLOR The final building material and color (along with other site and architectural enhancements described in the above conditions) shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. 11. GREEN BUILDING MEASURES The applicant shall submit a green building design program to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Green building design principles shall be incorporated into the project to the maximum extent possible: At the minimum, the project shall satisfy the following measures 13 - 53 Model Resolution Page 5 ASA-2006-22 June 26, 2007 . The project shall use tankless water heaters through out the project. Tankless water heaters are 20 to 30% more efficient than traditional water heaters. . The project shall use gas furnaces that have minimum efficiency ratings of 70%. Higher efficient furnaces on the market now can reach efficiency rating between 70% to 90%. . The applicant shall design the roofs of all residential units to be able to structurally facilitate future solar panel systems to account for the weight and wind loading factors. Final roof plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Official. . Lighter shades of roofing colors shall be used throughout the project in order to help reflect sunlight and to achieve cooler roof temperatures. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of June 2007, at a Regular Meeting of the Plarming Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: . ATTEST: APPROVED: Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Lisa Giefer, Chair Planning Commission G: \ Planning \ FDREPORT\ RES \ 2006 \ASA-2006-22.doc 13-54 I , I I I I I I I ; I I I I I I I . , c. Tracy House Location: 10855 North Stelling Road Ownership status: Private/residence This is one of the more interesting properties from an architectural standpoint. The house was built by Enoch P~ish and has many interesting architectural oddities and a variety of styles. It was moved to the present location in 1~37 from Lawrence Road. The preservation of this house may well hinge on whether or not it can be moved. It currently sits on valuable commercial property (10855 N. Stelling Road), and needs a good deal of work if it is, to be preserved. IS The committee awarded 38 out of 110 points. Overall ranking: 16 13 - 55 24 fp FEHR& PEERS TlAIISP~ITATlOM COIISVLTAIITS MEMORANDUM Date: April 24, 2007 From: Gary Chao, City of Cupertino Jason Nesdahl, P.E. Ryan Walbert Las Paimas Residential Development Focused Traffic Analysis To: Subject: SJ07-943 This memorandl,lm presents the results of the focused traffic analysis conducted for the proposed 21-unit Las Palmas residential development, located at 10855 N. Stelling Road in Cupertino, California. The City of Cupertino requested that a larger project description, twenty-two (22) units, be evaluated. The purpose of the analysis is to identify the potential impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding transportation system in the project vicinity. Figure 1 shows a detailed site plan of the proposed project Studv Locations The following intersections were selected for analyses in consultation with City staff: 1. Homestead Road and Stelling RoadIHollenback Avenue (City of Sunnyvale intersec~ion) 2. Stevens Creek Boulevard/Stelling Road (CMP Intersection) The oPerations of the two study Intersections were evaluated during the weekday AM and PM peak hour. The peak hour represents the highest one-hour volumes during the weekday . commute periods (7:00 - 9:00 am and 4:00 - 6:00 pm). Intersection turning movement counts were. conducted at both study locations on January 25, 2007. The traffic counts are contained in Attachment A. Trio Generation Estimates The number of trips generated by the proposed 22-unit residential development was estimated by applying trip rates from Trip Generation (InsliMe of Transportation Engineers, 7th Edition) to the size of the project. Table 1 contains trip rates and estimates. The proposed project is estimated to generate 25 AM peak-hour trips (6 inboundl19 outbound) and 27 PM peak-hour trips (17 inboundl10 outbound). 160 WeslSanla Clara Street, Suite 675 San Jose, CA 95113 (408) 278-1700 Fax (408) 278-1717 www.fehrandpeers.com 13 - 56 Mr. Gary Chao April 24. 2007 Page 2 of 7 fP FHi R & :PEE itS iaAils~'."AtU)i .CiJ.SULU.ln TABLE 1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Size AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use kUnits Rate In Out Total I Rate In Out Total Single-Family Detached 22. 1.13 6 19 25 11.25 17 10 27 Source: Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers'. .,., Edition). Levels of Service Methodoloav The operations of the intersections were evaluated using Level of Service (LOS) calculations. Level of Service is a qualitative description of an intersection's operation, ranging from LOS A, or free-flow conditions, to LOS F, or over-saturated conditions. The level of service methodology approved by the City of Cupertino and the VfA analyzes a signalized Intersection's operation based on average control vehicular delay calculated using the method described in Chapter 16 of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board) with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect conditions in Santa Clara County. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The average control delay for signalized Intersections is calculated using TRAFFIX analysis software and is correlated to a LOS designation as shown in Table 2. . The LOS standard (i.e:, minimum acceptable operations) for signalized Intersections in the City of Cupertino is LOS D except at Stevens Creek BoulevardlDe Anza Boulevard and De Anza BoulevardlBollinger Road. These Intersections must maintain LOS E+ operations (with no more than 60 seconds weighted average control delay). 13 - 57 Mr. Gary Chao April 24, 2007 Page 3 of 7. fP FEHR & PEERS flANS,"OI'AtI.. to...LT.." TABLE 2 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS USING AVERAGE CONTROL VEHICULAR DELAY level of Average Control Delay per Service Description Vehicle (Seconds) A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable s 10.0 progression andlor short cycle lengths. B+ Operations with low delay occurring with good 10.1 to 12.0 B progression and/or short cycle lengths. 12.1 to 18.0 B- 18.1 to 20.0 C+ Operations with average delays resulting from fair 20.1 to 23.0 C progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle 23.1 to 32.0 C- failures begin to appear. 32.1 to 35.0 D+ Operations with longer delays due to a combination of 35.1 to 39.0 D unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, and high 39.1 to 51.0 0- VlC ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle 51.1 to 55.0 failures are noticeable. E+ Operations with high delay values indicating poor 55.1 to 60.0 E progression, long cycle lengths, and high VIC ratios. 60.1 to 75.0 E- Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. 75.1 to 80.0 F Operations with delays unacceptable to most drivers > 80.0 occurring due to over-saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths. Source: vrA's CMP Traffic Level of Service Analysis Guidefines. June 2003, and Transportation Research Board. Highway Capaclty Manual, 2000. Intersection levels of service calculations were conducted to evaluate intersection operations under Existing,. Background, and Project Conditions. Background Conditions are defined as conditions prior to completion of the proposed development and serve as the basis to identify project impacts. Traffic volumes for Background Conditions comprise of existing volumes plus traffic generated by approved but not yet constructed developments in the area. A list of approved projects was obtained from the cities of Cupertino and Sunnyvale. The project traffic was added to Background volumes to represent Project Conditions. Table 3 summarizes the LOS results and Attachment B contains the LOS calculation sheets. 13 - 58 Mr. Gary Chao April 24, 2007 Page 4 of7 fP FEHR. & PEERS n"UPOltA'IOil ceUUL't"IU Figure 1 Site Plan n ;i :-1 ;, <<~~*\h__.~! t- il f I I: _.b~~.1i \~ Yi; ,~~ f~~ ,., \ . ii, ~. \t'~>; '",I. " . - L fi . r\ t '1~ ~;, \i, J,:1\ 1, '! li ~ ; "~~ i ',if! t . 1 1i li,ll ,'I! .J.... t ~ ki; ~, J't' ~ '.I \t-..,....,.. i~ , i If, i, ' : 1..1 L i... IN' " ,i ,< , ~ I: .. '/\Uf"~ ,I, f !,t ;-l" " , Ii \. !.'<<JL.~_' ~...~:~~~ ~~. r~fE WAy 2&0 @ '"""" z . ,C/) -f m ...... r'"-' Z G) A) o )> o 13 - 59 Mr. Gary Chao April 24, 2007 Page 5 of7 fP FEHR & PEERS u'ANs.oa'.UOI (D"'UL1A." TABLE 3 INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE Intersection Peak Existing Background Project Hour Delay' LOS Delay' LOS Delay' LOS AM 42.8 D 43.6 D 43.7 D Homestead Rd.lStelling Rd. PM 54.8 D- 57.1 E+ 57.3 E+ Stevens Creek Blvd.lStelling Rd. AM 43.5 D 45.8 D 45.9 D PM 51.6 D- 71.6 E 72.2 E Notes: Bold type indicates an unacceptable level of service. 1 Average control delay expressed In seconds per vehicle usIng the methodology described In the 2000 Highway Capac/fy Manual. Impacts The results of the level of service calculations for Background Conditions were compared to the results for Project Conditions to identify significant impacts. City of Cuoertino Intersections A significant project impact to a Cupertino signalized intersection occurs if the addition of project results in: 1. Operations at a signalized intersection to deteriorate from LOS D or better under Background Conditions to LOS E or F under Project Conditions; or 2. Exacerbation of unacceptable operations (LOS E or F) at a signalized intersection by increasing the average critical delay by four (4) seconds or more and increasing the volume-to-capacity 0//C) ratio by 0.01 or more. With the addition of project traffic, the Homestead Road/Stelling Road intersection would continue to operate at LOS 0 (43.7 seconds of delay) during the AM peak hour and LOS E+ (57.3 seconds of delay) during the PM peak hour. The intersection would operate unacceptably during the PM peak hour; however, the project would not increase the average critical delay by more than four seconds or increase the vIe ratio by more than 0.01. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a significant Impact at this intersection. CMP Intersections A significant impact to a CMP intersection occurs if the addition of project traffic results in: 1. Op.erations at a signalized intersection to deteriorate from LOS E under Background Conditions to LOS F under Project Conditions; or 13 - 60 Mr. Gary Chao April 24,2007 Page 6 of7 fP fEHR & PEERS U..,iJ'O.tA'IOtrl (DW$IH,'A*U 2. Exacerbation of unacceptable operations (LOS F) at a signalized Intersection by increasing the average critical delay by four (4) seconds or more and increasing the volume-to-capacity'(V/C) ratio by 0.01 or more. With the addition of project traffic, the Stevens Creek Boulevard/Stelling Road intersection would continue to operate at LOS 0 (45.9 seconds of delay) during the AM peak hour and LOS.E (72.2 seconds of delay) during the PM peak hour. The intersection would operate unacceptably during the PM peak hour; however, the project would not Increase the average critical delay by more than four seconds or increase the vie ratio by more than 0.01. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a significant impact at this intersection. Site Access. On-Site Circulation. and ParkinQ As shown on Figure 1, full access (left and right-turns in and out) to the site will be provided via one driveway on Stelling Road. One driveway is .sufficlent to accommodate the traffic volumes generated by the project. A queuing analysis was conducted at the project driveway and a maximum queue of one vehicle inbound or outbound at the project driveway was estimated during both AM !3nd PM peak hours. The worksheets are contained in Attachment C. According to City code, twenty-two (22) feet is the required minimum two-way aisle width for 90 degree parking stalls with a parking stall width of 8.5 feet. The site plan proposes aisle widths that range from 16 to 28 feet. The proposed 24 feet aisle widths between garage openings are too narrow for larger vehicles to access the garages without making multiple point turns for ingress and egress at these locations. A turning template was used at these stalls and a passenger car was not able to access the stall without running over the curbs. We recommend that a turning templates schematic is provided by the applicant to illustrate how vehicles would access the parking spaces. The City's Municipal Zoning Code requires 2.8 parking spaces (2 garage plus 0.8 open) for every residential unit constructed. This requires the project applicant to provide a total of 62 parking spaces (22 units*2.8 spaces/unit) for the entire site. Based on the project site plan dated January 25, 2006, the parking suppiy is 64 spaces {44 covered, 18 on-site including 1 handicap, and 20tf- site parking stalls). The proposed ~upply meets the parking requirements. However, the seven (7) parking stalls on the north and south side of the project would serve small cars or motorcycles. We recommend the site plan be modified to provide adequate access to these parking spaces throughout the site. StellinQ Road Access and Potential NarrowinQ The City of Cupertino is considering narrowing Stelling Road from four lanes to two lanes to match the existing cross-sections north of Homestead Road and south of 1-280. No conceptual or construction plans have been produced for this narrowing project. Thus, an assessment of this proposal was conducted based on traffic volumes and projected operations. A 24-hour machine count was conducted on Stelling Road south of Homestead Road on Thursday, January 25, 2007. During the AM peak-hour, 736 vehicles were counted in the southbound direction and 968 vehicles were counted in the northbound direction. Ouring the PM peak-hour, 1,183 southbound vehicles were recorded and 822 vehicles traveled northbound. The typical capacity for a one lane road similar to Stelling Road ranges from 800 to 1,000 vehicles per 13 - 61 Mr. Gary Chao April24,2007 Page 7 of 7 fP FEHR. &PfER.S '..ws,'on"'roll to,sltu..au hour per lane per direction depending on traffic control and other factors affecting the flow of traffic (e.g., on-street parking, the number of driveways). In general, the operations of a roadway are controlled by the operation of intersections. A roadway can operate with higher volumes if access points are limited and traffic signals provide a majority of the "green time" on the major street approaches. The addition of a landscaped median on $telling Road between Homestead Road and the 1-280 overcrossing was analyzed to determine its feasibility. A median would enhance the streetscape but restrict access to adjacent driveways along Stelling Road creating right in/right out driveways or allowing inbound left-turns. Outbound drivers wanting to go south on Stelling Road would be required to turn right out of the shopping center or residential development (ViI/a Serra) and make U-turns at Homestead Road/Stelling Road. Currently this intersection has restricted U-turn movements on all approaches. For each peak hour, the intersection could accommodate approximately 50 additional northbound U-turns and still operate with the same LOS rating under Project Conditions. The number of vehicles needing to make U-turns includes not only vehicles from the existing shopping center, but those generated by the residential development (Villa Serra) located south of the shopping center on Stelling Road. Based on the projected unacceptable intersection LOS under Background and Project Conditions during the PM peak hour, we recommend that any narrowing of SteUlng Road should not reduce the capacity of any of the approaches to the Homestead Road/Stelling Road intersection. Narrowing could potentially begin 300 feet south of the Homestead Road/Stelling Road northbound stop bar and extend south to match the existing two-lane roadway section near the project site. A bus stop exists approximately 250 feet south of Homestead Road that would also need to be accommodated. We recommend that a two-way left-turn lane be maintained on Stelling Road with any narrowing project to allow left-turns to and form the commercial areas on Stelling Road. Conclusions Based on the small number of trips generated by the proposed project, operations at two nearby intersections are not expected to substantially degrade. We recommend the site plan be modified to provide adequate access to several guest parking spaces. Any narrowing of Stelling Road shall not reduce the approach lanes at Homestead Road/Stelling Road. Northbound U-turns should be allowed at Homestead Road/Stelling Road with a median island or a two-way left-turn lane should be maintained with narrowing of Stelling Road. 1 3 - 62 fP FEHR & PEERS .'tAIlISPOITA"OI (OIlSUll.Mn ATTACHMENTS 13 - 63 fP FEHR & PEERS t.".S,.OUA'.D.. lDlfSUI.".lS ATTACHMENT A TRAFFIC COUNTS 13 - 64 Traffic Data Service Campbell, CA (408) 377-2988 tdsbay@cs.com File Name : 1 AMFINAL Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 1/25/2007 Page No : 1 Start TIme Factor 07:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM Total 08:00 AM 13 123 57 0 193 36 138 21 0 195 50 85 63 0 198 75 154 29 0 258 844 08:15 AM 12 90 42 0 144 43 139 52 0 234 45 101 42 0 188 55 73 38 0 166 732 08:30 AM 19 72 46 0 137 51 128 28 0 207 51 154 53 0 258 36 89 22 0 147 749 08:45 AM 10 94 53 0 157 39 147 37 0 223 59 112 58 0 229 51 55 16 0 122 731 Total 54 379 198 0 631 169 552 138 0 859 205 452 216 0 873 217 371 105 0 693 3056 Grand T alai 1121 708 442 Apprch % 9.5 55.7 34.8 Total % 2.2 12.8 8 o 12711289 1069 242 o 18.1 66.8 15.1 o 23 5.2 19.4 4.4 o 16001298 711 398 o 21.2 50.5 28.3 o 29 5.4 12.9 7.2 ~ 14071 ~~; ~~ f8~ o 2&.5 5.7 12.6 4.2 g 12381 5516 o 22.4 07:45 AM 13 123 76 0 212 26 130 32 0 188 31 94 66 0 191 50 110 40 0 200 791 08:00 AM 13 123 57 0 193 36 138 21 0 195 50 85 63 0 198 75 154 29 0 258 844 . 08:15AM 12 90 42 0 144 43 139 52 0 234 45 101 42 0 188 55 73 38 0 166 732 08:30 AM 19 72 46 0 137 51 128 28 0 207 51 154 53 0 258 36 89 22 0 147 749 Total Volume 57 408 221 0 686 156 535 133 0 824 177 434 224 0 835 216 426 129 0 771 3116 %ADll. Total 8.3 59.5 32.2 0 18.9 64.9 16.1 0 21.2 52 26.8 0 28 55.3 16.7 0 PHF .750 .829 .727 .000 .809 .765 .962 .639 .000 .880 .868 .705 .848 .000 .809 .720 .692 .806 .000 .747 .923 13 - 65 Traffic Data Service Campbell, CA (408) 377-2988 tdsb~s.com File Name : 1 PMFINAL Site Code : 00000001 Start Date : 1/25/2007 Page No : 1 Start Time Factor 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM Total 05:00 PM 42 n 57 0 176 76 138 17 0 231 26 166 111 1 304 74 162 86 0 322 1033 05:15 PM 40 79 60 0 179 72 147 30 0 249 13 207 153 0 373 25 134 50 0 209 1010 05:30 PM 20 78 48 0 146 71 138 20 0 229 20 233 100 0 353 41 129 111 0 281 1009 05:45 PM 22 69 71 0 162 95 155 18 0 268 10 157 72 0 239 51 159 99 0 309 978 Total 124 303 236 0 663 314 578 85 0 9n 69 763 436 1 1269 191 584 346 0 1121 4030 06:00 PM 44 97 61 0 202 87 142 16 0 245 24 200 88 0 312 66 120 84 0 270 1029 06:15 PM 43 96 53 0 192 90 131 12 0 233 29 204 97 0 330 75 160 80 0 315 1070 06:30 PM 18 53 53 0 124 46 109 47 0 202 27 155 98 2 282 59 162 84 0 305 913 06:45 PM 35 57 63 0 155 61 85 36 0 182 26 174 90 0 290 71 184 61 0 296 923 Total 140 303 230 0 673 284 467 111 0 862 106 733 373 2 1214 271 606 309 0 1186 3935 Grand Total 1439 886 635 0 19601830 1481 287 0 25981234 1960 1140 3 33371706 1677 938 0 3321111216 Apprch % 22.4 45.2 32.4 0 31.9 57 11 0 23.2 2. r 58.7 34.2 0.1 21.3 50.15 28.2 0 Total % 3.9 7.9 5.7 0 17.5 7.4 13.2 2.6 0 17.5 10.2 0 29.8 6.3 15 8.4 0 29.6 05:30 PM 20 78 48 0 146 71 138 20 0 229 20 233 100 0 353 41 129 111 0 281 1009 05:45 PM 22 69 71 0 162 95 155 18 0 268 10 157 72 0 239 51 159 99 0 309 978 06:00 PM 44 97 61 0 202 87 142 16 0 245 24 200 88 0 312 66 120 84 0 270 1029 06:15 PM 43 96 53 0 192 90 131 12 0 233 29 204 97 0 330 75 160 80 0 315 1070 Total Volume 129 340 233 0 702 343 566 66 0 975 83 794 357 0 1234 233 568 374 0 1175 4086 % Ann. TOIaI 18.4 48.4 33.2 0 35.2 158.1 6.8 0 6.7 64.3 28.9 0 19.8 48.3 31.8 0 PHF .733 .876 .820 .000 .869 .903 .913 .825 .000 .910 .716 .852 .893 .000 .874 .m .888 .842 .000 .933 .955 13 - 66 Traffic Data Service Campbell, CA (408) 3'T7~2988 tdsbtlJl@l:s.com File Name : 4AMFINAL Site Code : 00000004 Start Date : 1/25/2007 Page No : 1 08:00 AM 33 130 26 0 189 31 177 135 0 343 42 104 66 0 212 56 178 40 0 274 1018 08:15 AM 29 116 47 0 192 25 152 139 0 316 81 157 101 0 339 55 141 79 0 275 1122 08:30 AM 31 61 50 0 142 37 139 81 0 257 84 212 161 0 457 35 165 91 0 291 1147 08:45 AM 35 78 45 0 158 25 142 92 0 259 83 172 131 0 386 45 156 82 0 283 1086 Total 128 385 168 0 681 118 610 447 0 1175 290 645 459 0 1394 191 640 292 0 1123 4373 Grand Total 1276 671 242 0 11891179 1014 705 0 18981386 892 738 0 20161309 1095 504 0 1908/7011 Apprch % 23.2 56.4 20.4 0 9.4 53.4 37.1 0 19.1 44.2 36.6 0 16.2 57.4 26.4 0 Total % 3.9 9.6 3.5 0 17 2.6 14.5 10.1 0 27.1 5.5 12.7 10.5 0 28.8 4.4 15.6 7.2 0 27.2 08:00 AM 33 130 26 0 189 31 171 135 0 343 42 104 66 0 212 56 178 40 0 274 1018 08:15 AM 29 116 47 0 192 25 152 139 0 316 81 157 101 0 339 55 141 79 0 275 1122 08:30 AM 31 61 50 0 142 37 139 81 0 257 84 212 161 0 457 35 165 91 0 291 1147 OS:45 AM 35 78 45 0 158 25 142 92 0 259 83 172 131 0 386 45 156 82 0 283 1086 Total VoIlJlTI9 128 385 168 0 681 118 610 447 0 1175 290 645 459 O. 1394 191 640 292 0 1123 4373 % AnD. TDIal 18.8 56.5 24.7 0 10 51.9 38 0 20.8 46.3 32.9 0 17 57 26 0 PHF .914 .740 .840 .000 .887 .797 .862 .804 .000 .856 .863 .761 .713 .000 .763 .853 .899 .802 .000 .965 .953 13 - 67 Traffic Data Service Campbell, CA (408) 377-2988 tdsbflJ@cs.colll File Name : 4PMFINAL Site Code : 00000004 Start Date : 1/25/2007 Page No : 1 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05::30 PM 05:45 PM Total 50 102 47 86 57 84 66 150 220 422 74 72 68 91 305 o o o o o 226 205 209 307 947 52 205 80 217 68 241 46 270 246 933 11 107 100 121 339 o 268 73 91 69 o 404 86 110 61 o 409 92 105 80 o 437 90 97 63 o 15181 341 403 273 o 233 o 257 o 277 o 250 o 1017 53 287 51 269 43 232 93 289 240 1077 84 82 73 97 336 o 424 o 402 o :348 o 479 o 1653 1151 1268 1243 1473 5135 06:00 PM 68 148 103 0 319 47 260 108 0 415 94 115 78 0 287 53 295 111 0 459 1480 06:15 PM 50 125 97 0 272 32 193 92 0 317 63 92 82 0 237 44 292 103 0 439 1265 06:30 PM 36 83 48 0 167 37 1n 69 0 283 45 67 52 0 164 42 210 58 0 310 924 06:45 PM 45 86 57 0 188 30 175 70 0 275 33 61 29 0 123 68 192 74 0 334 920 Total 199 442 305 0 946 146 805 339 0 1290 235 335 241 0 811 207 989 346 0 1542 4589 Grand ToIall576 1159 850 Apprch % 22.3. 44.8 32.9 Total % 4.2 8.5 6.2 o 25851513 2406 9n o . 13.2 61.8 25.1 o 19 3.8 17.7 7.2 o 3896\839 1014 754 o 32.2 38.9 28.9 o 28.6 6.2 7.5 5.5 o 26071625 2942 950 o 13.8 65.1 21 o 19.2 4.6 21.6 7 g 4517113605 o 33.2 05:15 PM 47 86 72 0 205 80 217 107 0 404 86 110 61 0 257 51 269 82 0 402 1268 05:30 PM 57 84 68 0 209 68 241 100 0 409 92 105 80 0 2n 43 232 73 0 348 1243 05:45 PM 66 150 91 0 307 46 270 121 0 437 90 97 63 0 250 93 289 97 0 479 1473 06:00 PM 68 148 10~ 0 319 47 260 108 0 415 94 115 78 0 287 53 295 111 0 459 1480 Total Volume 238 468 334 0 1040 241 988 436 0 1665 362 427 282 0 1071 240 1085 363 0 1688 5464 % A.DD. T....al 22.9 45 32.1 0 14.5 59.3 26.2 0 33.8 39.9 26.3 0 14.2 64.3 21.5 0 PHF .875 .780 .811 .000 .815 .753 .915 .901 .000. .953 .963 .928 .881 .000 .933 .645 .919 .818 .000 .881 .923 13 - 68 EventCount-1691 Page 1 Traffic Data Service Event Counts EventCount-1691 - Em~lish CENU) Datasets: Site: Input A: Input B: Name: Scheme: Units: [1N] NB STELLING RD SIO HOMESTEAD RD 1 - North bound. - Added to totals. (1) o - Unused or unknown. - Exduded from totals. (0) Traffic Data Service Count events divided by two. Non metric (ft, mi, ftls. mph, Ib, ton) * Thursday, January 25, 2007=1 0082, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0100 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1100 1800 1900 2000 2100 22 7 9 12 13 33 118 521 .934 785 529 654 704 633 669 739 638 808 704 500 462 3U 7 2 4 2 5 3 16 59 209 242 130 96 161 163 150 171 182 194 201 127 133 83 4 3 2 3 2 4 23 89 199 200 120 152 113 166 166 203 156 195 202 113 139 90 5 1 3 3 1 10 29 158 285 214 156 192 201 174 181 190 150 194 145 119 111 62 6 1 0 4 5 16 50 215 241 129 123 214 169 130 172 175 150 225 156 141 79 77 AM Peak 0830 . 0930 (968). AM PHF=O.B5 PM Peak 1730 . 1830 (822), PM PHF=O.91 2200 2300 208 68 68 23 78 15 35 16 27 14 9 13 1 4 * Friday, January 26, 2007=9284, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 .0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 27 5 5 8 10 34 114 489 901 708 519 585 671 638 655 624 535 656 678 506 337 309 176 94 9 2 2 3 4 2 22 55 178 224 143 117 149 167 132. 164 151 165 197 146 94 92 61 31 21 13 1 1 3 2 7 30 105 223 172 132 156 181 152 182. 174 128 151 164 128 93 12 35 26 11 1 2 1 0 2 9 34 146 257 160 131 152 175 167 158 151 120 161 145 123 61 72 41 14 12 4 0 1 2 2 16 28 183 243 152 113 160 166 152 183 135 136 179 172 109 99 73 39 23 9 AM Peak 0815-0915 (947). AM PHF=O.92 PM Peak 1730 -1830 (701). PM PHF=O.89 * Saturday, January 27,2007=7397,15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 53 31 23 8 7 14 33 160 340 430 543 556 693 647 21 8 10 1 0 4 5 19 56 100 137 153 198 146 11 6 1 2 0 2 8 42 65 103 110 138 154 179 12 8 5 1 3 3 10 50 77 99 143 124 172 171 9 9 7 4 4 5 10 50 142 128 153 141 169 151 AM Peak 1145 .1245 (665), AM PHF-O.B4 PM Peak 1200 -1300 (693), PM PHF-0.88 * Sunday, January 28, 2007=6892, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1900 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 55 32 23 10 6 13 32 76 167 303 498 516 808 558 623 603 604 533 506 350 234 188 113 41 23 8 7 2 0 1 5 17 35 59 124 105 217 140 165 150 168 158 129 88 63 66 43 9 6 11 12 5 2 3 3 8 11 37 60 137 133 242 150 151 134 153 128 124 93 61 46 26 9 2 6 6 5 2 1 5 7 24 44 89 130 145 177 124 158 161 136 122 130 96 54 45 20 12 6 9 6 6 4 2 4 12 24 51 95 107 133 172 144 149 158 147 125 123 73 56 31 24 11 1 AM Peak 1145.1245 (789), AM PHFaO.79 PM Peak 1200 -1300 (BOB), PM PHF=O.83 * Monday, January 29, 2007=9419, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 15 8 3 6 9 35 102 412 909 735 543 570 724 567 633. 678 628 802. 637 447 475 283 128 70 6 5 1 0 2 4 17 57 171 208 140 103 170 144 143 138 158 197 183 119 138 74 51 26 6 2 2 2 2 1 10 19 82 204 199 120 131 166 142 179 197 169 187 179 lOB 144 71 24 26 5 6 0 0 1 2 9 31 139 266 186 153 193 215 164 151 188 166 209 132 120 99 72 34 9 8 1 1 0 3 4 12 35 134 268 142 130 143 173 117 160 155 136 209 143 100 94 66 19 9 5 AM Peak 0815-0915 (946). AM PHF..~.88 PM Pef.k 1700 -1800 (802). PM PHFcO.96 * Tuesday, JanUary 30, 2007=9890,15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0900 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 24 11 2 9 13 35 124 539 940 778 S38 551 773 674 6 3 0 1 5 5 27 65 198 245 112 105 174 163 5 1 1 2 0 5 25 89 217 190 147 121 200 161 8 3 1 4 3 11 2B 175 277 185 157 170 236 185 5 4 0 2 5 14 44 210 248 15B 122 155 163 165 AM Peak 0815 . 0915 (987). AM PHF=O.89 PM Peak 1715 -1B15 (821), PM PHF"O.92 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 575 570 643 516 435 352 272 223 158 115 160 143 157 148 114 92 92 58 54 35 23 144 150 175 116 123 102 72 43 36 21 17 129 139 190 113 107 74 56 68 39 34 6 142 138 121 139 91 84 52 54 29 25 9 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 624 691 531 802 690 537 464 329 160 51 170 148 136 184 203 146 156 122 74 17 9 166 168 147 185 115 133 146 81 36 12 2 132 185 127 210 168 124 84 69 28 10 5 156 190 121 223 144 134 79 57 22 12 2 13 - 69 Eve~unt-1692 Page 1 Traffic Data Service Event Counts EventCount-1692 - Enallsh {ENU) Datasets: Site: ' Input A: Input B: Name: Scheme: Units: (1S] SB STELLING RD SIO HOMESTEAD RD 3 - South bound. - Added to totals. (1) o - Unused or unknown. - Excluded from totals. (0) Traffic Data SelVice Count events divided by two. Non metric (ft, ml, ftIs, mph, Ib, ton) * Thursday, January 25.2007=9843,15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 OBOO 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 21 13 3 12 13 38 80 414 736 611 492 494 581 584 594 747 749 1123 1012 692 406 248 131 49 4 4 0 2 2 4 16 56 209 189 135 106 179 171 153 165 159 221 281 226 124 91 50 17 7 7 5 1 2 1 4 17 105 222 189 148 124 135 154 128 180 178 265 259 196 91 63 39 12 8 3 2 1 ... 7 7 18 82 129 108 110 131 138 118 172 210 191 313 233 143 99 56 22 12 4 7 2 1 4 3 23 29 171 176 125 99 133 129 141 141 192 221 324 239 127 92 38 20 8 4 AM Peak 0800.0900 (736), AM PHF=O.83 PM Peak 1715 .1815 (1183). PM PHF-o.91 13 - 70 ATTACHMENT B INTERSECTION LOS CALCULATION WORKSHEETS (EXISTING, BACKGROUND, PROJECT) fP FEHR & PEERS 1"'S''''AlIDI (D_SUUA.n 13 - 71 COMPARE Tue Apr 2410:48:102007 LasPoIlI181l Version 1: April 9, 2007 Page 3-1 L.eval Of Service Con1lutation Report 2000 HeM Operallons (Future VokJme AIlemaliYe) Exislina AM Intersection #1: Homestead RdlStelllng Rd Slgnal-Protec:llRigh....lnducle Initial Val: ri7 408 221- Lan..: 10 1 01 .-J~~~~ Sign....Prclecl Signel..Prolect Inltlal Vol: Lanes: Rights-lnclude Vol Cn1 Date: nla Rights-Inctude Lanes: Initial \/01: .J- Cycle TIme (see): 130 ~ 129m 0 156 ~ Lou Time (see): 12 J.- 0 428 ,...,.... CrItIcal Vie: .0.60S ...,.. 535'"" -:r Avg Crtt Del (seclveh): 43.4 ~ 0 216 0 .. Avg Delay (sec/\Ieh): 42.8 133 LOS: D ~ ~ t ,. ~ Lanes: 2 0 0 initial Vol: 224 434- 177 Signat.Prolectllights-lnclude . Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R --------------------------- 1---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 224 434 177 221 408 57 129 426 216 133 535 156 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 224 434 177 221 408 57 129 426 216 133 535 156 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved:. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 224 434 177 221 408 57 129 426 216 133 535 156 User Adj: 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 PHF Volume: 224 434 177 221 408 57 129 426 216 133 535 156 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 224 434 177 221 408 57 129 426 216 133 535 156 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 FinalVolume: 224 434 177 221 408 57 129 426 216 133 535 l56 ------------I---------~-----I I------~--~-----I 1---------------1 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 BOO 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.92 1. 00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 1. 40 0.60 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 31 0.69 1.00 1. 54 0.46 Final Sat. : 3150 2627 1072 1750 1900 1750 1750 2454 1244 1750 2B64 835 ------------1---------------1 1---------------11---------------11---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.17 0.17 0.13 0.21 0.03 0.07 0.17 0.17 O.OB 0.19 0.l9 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 15.5 35.3 35.3 27.0 46.8 46.8 15.8 38.7 38.7 17 .0 39.9 39.9 Volume/Cap: 0.60 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.60 0.09 0.61 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.61 0.61 Delay/Veh: 56.9 42.4 42.4 49.7 35.3 27.6 59.2 39.6 39.6 57.0 39.3 39.3 User DelAdj: l.00 l.00 l. 00 1.00 l.00 1.00 l. 00 1.00 l.00 l.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh ': 56.9 42.4 42.4 49.7 35.3 27.6 59.2 39.6 39.6 57.0 39.3 39.3 LOS by Move: E+ D D D D+ C E+ D D E+ D HCM2k95thQ: 10 20 20 17 24 3 12 2l 21 12 22 22 Tralllx 7.8.0115 ~ht (e) 2005 DowtIng Associates. Inc. Lic8nsed to FEHR & PEERS, R~'3ILh? COMPARE Tue Apr 2410:48:10 2007 P_ 3-2 laIPalmas Version 1: AplI9. 2007 l.eYeI Of Service ~ Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume AllernaUvel Background AM Intersection #1: Homestead RdlStelling Rd S1gnal=Prolect SIgnal-Protect Inlflal Vol: lanes: RighlsoJnclude Vol Cn1 Date: nfa R1gh1s..Jnclude Lanes: lnhlal Vol: j- Cycle TIll10 (see): 130 1: 129 0 157 ~ loss TIllI8 (see): 12 427'- --. Critical VlC: 0.640 -+-- 536 ~ AVII Crlt Del ("""""'h): 44.4 ~ 0 238 0 ,. AVII Delay (seclveh): 43.6 .- 155- LOS: 0 ~ ~ t ,. ~ S1gnal-PIDteclJRights-lnclllde initial Vol: 60 457'" 221 Lanes: 10 1 01 ...-J4~~~ Lanes: 2 0 1 0 Initiol Vol: 226-' 444 179 SlgnaI-PrDtectlRights-lnclude Street Name: Steliing Rd Homestead Rd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West. Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ----------~-I---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 224 434 177 221 408 57 129 426 216 133 535 156 Growth Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 224 434 177 221 408 57 129 426 216 133 535 156 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved: 2 10 2 0 49 3 0 1 22 22 1 1 Initial Fut: 226 . 444 179 221 457 60 129 427 238 155 536 157 User Adj: 1.00 1. 00 ' 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 PHF Volume: 226 444 179 221 457 60 129 427 238 155 536 157 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 226 444 179 221 457 60 129 427 238 155 536 157 PCE Adj: 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1. 00 1. DO 1. 00 1.00 1. DO 1. DO 1.00 1. DO 1. 00 1. DC) 1. 00 1.00 FinalVo1ume: 226 444 179 221 457 60 129 427 238 155 536 157 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 1. 41 0.59 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.26 0.74 1.00 1.53 0.47 Final Sat. : 3150 2636 1063 1750 1900 1750 1750 2375 1324 1750 2861 838 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.17 0.17 0.13 0.24 0.03 0.07 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: **** *'*** **** **** Green Time: 14.6 36.3 36.3 27.2 48.9 48.9 15.4 36.5 36.5 18.0 39.1 39.1 Volume/Cap: 0.64 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.64 0.09 0.62 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.62 0.62 Delay/Veh: 59.1 41. 7. 41.7 49.4 35.3 26.3 60.3 42.3 42.3 58.6 40.2 40.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1. 00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 AdjDellVeh: 59.1 41.7 41. 7 49.4 35.3 26.3 60.3 42.3 42.3 58.6 40.2 40.2 LOS by Move: E+ 0 D D D+ C E D D E+ D HCM2k95thQ: 10 20 20 17 27 3 12 22 22 14 23 23 TraIlbf 7.8.0115 CoflI'rlght (e) 2005 Oooooling AasocIaIes, Inc. COMPARE Tue Apr 2410:48:1 0 2007 Page 3-3 Lao Palmas Version 1: Aptt 9, 2007 Loy. 01 5erYk:e Cor'r4>UIalIon Report 2000 HCM OperBllans (Fulure Volume Ahernattve) Projec1 AM Intersection #1: Homestead RdlSlelJlng Rd Signel-ProlectlRights-lncIude Initial Vol: 60 4sr- 221 L.anelI: 1 0 1 0 1 ~ ~ . .~ ~ Signal-Protect SIgnal-Protect Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights-Include Vol Cnt Date: nla Rights-Include Lenes: . Initial Val: -+ Cycle TIme {see): 130 ~ 129 0 156 ~ loss l1me (see): 12 .t- O 4-2T" ---+- CrllcaI VlC: 0.643 ~ 536 -:r Ayg Crll Del (HCiYeh): 44.6 ~ 0 238 0 ... Ayg Delay (secIVeh): 43.7 .- 15S- LOS: D ~ ~ t ~ ~ Lenes: 2 0 0 Inlllal Vol: 227'" 445 190 SlgnaI-Prolecllfli!j1ls-lnclude "Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 224 434 177 221 408 57 129 426 216 133 535 156 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 224 434 177 221 408 57 12.9 426 216 133 535 156 Added Vol: 1 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 Approved: 2 10 2 0 49 3 0 1 22 22 1 0 Initial Fut: 227 445 190 221 457 60 129 427 238 159 536 156 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Loo 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 PHF Volume; 227 445 190 221 457 60 129 427 238 159 536 156 Reduct Vol; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol; 227 445 190 221 457 60 129 427 238 159 536 156 PCE Adj: 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj; 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVo1ume: 227 445 190 221 457 60 129 427 238 159 536 156 ------------1---------------1 I-------------~-I 1---------------1 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 "1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment; 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.92 1. 00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 1. 39 0.61 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 26 0.74 1.00 1.54 0.46 Final Sat. : 3150 2592 1107 1750 1900 1750 1750 2375 1324 1750 2865 834 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.17 0.17 0.13 0.24 0.03 0.07 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.19 0.19 crit Moves: **** **** '**** **** Green Time: 14.6 36.4 36.4 26.8 48.7 48.7 15.5 36.4 36.4 18.4 39.3 39.3 Volume/Cap: 0.64 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.64 0.09 0.62 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.62 0.62 Delay/Veh: 59.2 41. 7 41.7 50.0 35.5 26.4 60.0 42.5 42.5 58.4 40.0 40.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 AdjDe1/Veh: 59.2 41.7 41. 7 50.0 35.5 26.4 60.0 42.5 42.5 58.4 40.0 40.0 LOS by Move: E+ 0 D D D+ C E D D E+ D HCM2k95thQ: 10 20 20 17 27 3 12 23 23 14 23 23 Traffbc 7.8.0115 ~ht (c) 200S Dowling Associates. Inc. UCensed 10 FEHR . PEERS, R~1IIlIl4 COMPARE Tuel\fX 24 10:48:10 2007 Las Palmas V_on 1: AprI9, 2007 Page 3-4 Leovel Of 8erYice Computation Report 2000 HCM OperaIIons (Future Volume AI1ematlvel Eldsting AM Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd! Stelling Rd Signal-ProtecllRights-lnclude Initiel Vol: 128 385'" 1 68 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 .-J-4t~~ Signal.Protect Slgnal-P(otect lnilial Vol: Lanes: Righfs,.lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: n1a Rights-include Lanes: initial Vol: .Ja Cycle Time (see): 115 1= 292"" 0 118 ~ Loss lime (see): 12 0 640 3 -. Critical Vie: 0.737 ......,.. 2 610'" 0 r Avg Crit Del (aeclveh): 46.3 '= 0 191 Avg Delay (secIveh): 43.5 ;;- 2 447 LOS: 0 ~ ~ t ~ ~ . Street Name: Stelling Rd Stevens Creek Blvd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 459. 645 290 168 385 128 292 640 191 447 610 118 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 459 645 290 168 385 128 292 640 191 447 610 118 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved: 0 0 0 0 0 0 O. 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 459 645 290 168 385 128 292 640 191 447 610 118 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 459 645 290 168 385 128 292 640 191 447 610 118 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 459 645 290 168 385 128 292 640 191 447 610 118 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 459 645 290 168 385 128 292 640 191 447 610 118 ------------I-~-------------I 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 1.36 0.64 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.50 0.50 Final Sat.: 1750 2552 1147 1750 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 4691 907 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.17 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.13 0.13 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 40.9 Volume/Cap: 0.74 Delay/Veh: 37.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 37.0 LOS by Move: 0+ HCM2k95thQ: 27 Lanes: 0 1 0 Inl1lal Vol: 459- 645 290 Slgnal.ProtectlRlghts-lnclude **** **** 41.1 0.71 33.6 1. 00 33.6 C- 26 1"5.8 0.74 53.1 1.00 53.1 E+ 15 20.5 0.63 45.1 1.00 45.1 o 15 41.1 15.6 0.71 0.71 33.6 56.9 1.00 1.00 33.6 56.9 C- 26 15.8 0.53 48.5 1. 00 48.5 0- 10 26.0 0.74 48.5 1.00 48.5 o 21 14 Trafli. 7.8.0115 Copyrlght (e) 2005 DowlIng AssocIates. Ino. 20.5 0.61 47.2 1. 00 47.2 o 14 25.8 0.63 42.1 1.00 42.1 D 16 20.3 0.74 47.8 1.00 47 .8 D 16 **** 20.3 0.74 4.7.8 1.00 47.8 D 16 l.Icensed to FEHR & PEERS. R~t5 COMPARE Tue Apr 2410:48:102007 Page 3-5 Las Palmes Version 1: AprI 9, 2007 Level Of Sarvica CompulaIlon Report 2000 HCM 0peraIl0ns (FuhnVoIume Alt8rnadll9} Background AM Intersection #3: Stevens Creek BJvdI Stelling Rd Sign.....Prolllc1 Signal=Prolect Inl1ialVoI: Lanes: Rights-Include Vol Ont Dale: nla Rights-olnclude Lanes: Inl1lalVol: ..f Cycle r... I-I: 115 ~ 30r- 118 ~ Locslime (sac): 12 ~ 0 718 3 -+ CrlIIcaI VIC: 0.792 ~ 731- 0 ~ Ayg Crit DaI (aecIveh): 48.9 1 () 280 .. Ayg Delay (secIvah): 45.8 2 479 LOS: 0 SIgnaI_ProlectlFlights-olnclude lnI1IeI Vol: 1n 43S- 173 Lanes: 10201 ~""t~~ ~ ~ t,. ,.-. Lanes: 0 () Inllia! Vol: 468'" 659 292 S1gnal-ProlectlRighls-lncluda . Street Name: Stelling Rd Stevens Creek Blvd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T - . R L T R L T R L T R --------------------------- 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ---------~--I---------------I 1---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 459 645 290 168 385 128 292 640 191 447 610 118 Growth Adj: 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 459 645 290 168 385 128 292 640 191 447 610 118 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved: 9 14 . 2 5 50 49 15 .78 89 32 121 0 Initial Fut: 468 659 292 173 435 177 307 718 280 479 731 118 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 . 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. DO 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 468 659 292 173 435 177 307 718 280 479 731 118 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 468 659 292 173 435 177 307 718 280 479 731 118 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Fina1Vo1ume: 468 659 292 173 435 177 307 718 280 479 731 118 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 1.37 0.63 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.57 0.43 Final Sat. : 1750 2563 1136 1750 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 4821 778 ----------~-I---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.18 0.13 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 38.9 40.1 40.1 15.4 16.6 16.6 25.5 24.4 24.4 23.2 22.0 22.0 Volume/Cap: 0.79 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.79 0.70 0.79 0.59 0.76 0.76 0.79 0.79 De1ay/Veh: 41. 6 35.1 35.1 59.5 55.2 55.2 52.8 41.7 51.1 48.4 48.4 48.4 User De1Adj: 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 LOO 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjOel/Veh: 41. 6 35.1 35.1 59.5 55.2 55.2 52.8 41.7 51.1 48.4 48.4 48.4 LOS by Move: 0 0+ 0+ E+ E+ E+ O- n 0- 0 D HCM2k95thQ: 29 27 27 15 18 15 23 16 21 18 19 19 Traflx7.8.0115 ~righllc) 2OIIi5 Dowling AssocJatea, Inc. Ucensad to FEHR & PEERS, ~ COMPARE Tue ApT 24 10:48:10 2007 Page 3-6 Lu Palmaa Vorslan 1: Apd 9, 2007 Intersection #3: Stevens Creek BIvdf Stelling Ad Level Of ServIce ~on Repol1 2000 HCM 0pendI0na (FuMe Volume AJtemallve) Project m SignaI.Prolect SlgnalaProtecl InifialVoI: Lanes: Rights-Include Vol Cn! Dalll: nIa Rights-Include Lanes: lritiel Vol: jo CI'CI& Time (oec): 115 ~ 308- 0 119 ~ l.aso lime (see): 12 .t- O 718 3 ~ CrllcaJ Vie: 0.793 +-' 2 731- 0 :r Avg O~l Del (oecIveh): 49.0 1= 0 280 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 45.9 2 479 LOS: D SigneJ-ProtectlRighb-lnclude Inltlal Vol: 179 43r" 175 Lan...: 10201 ~~+~~ ~~t~~ Lanes: 0 0 Initial Val: 468-' 660 292 Signal-ProtectlF\lghtsalnclude . Street Name: Stelling Rd Stevens Creek Blvd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L t R L T R L T R ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1-------------__1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 I--------~---___I Volume Module: Base Vol: 459 645 290 168 385 1.28 292 640 191 447 610 118 Growth Adj: 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 459 645 290 168 385 128 292 640 191 447 610 118 Added Vol: 0 1 0 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 Approved: 9 14 2 5 50 49 15 78 89 32 121 0 Initial Fut: 468 660 292 175 437 179 . 308 718 280 479 731 119 User Adj: 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lao PHF Adj: 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 PHF Volume: 468 660 292 175 437 179 308 718 280 479 731 119 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 468 660 292 175 437 179 308 718 280 479 731 119 peE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 FinalVolume: 468 660 292 175 437 179 308 718 280 479 731 119 ------------1---------------1 I----~----------I 1------------___1 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1. 00 0.92 0.92 1. DO 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 1.37 0.63 1.00 2.00 1.00 1. 00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.56 0.44 Final Sat. : 1750 2564 1135 1750 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 4815 784 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 )---------------1 1---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.12 0.10 0.18 0.13 0.16 0.15 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves; **** **** **'** **** Gr.een Time: 38.8 39.9 39.9 15.5 16.7 16.7 25.5 24.4 24.4 23.2 22.0 22.0 Volume/Cap: 0.79 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.79 0.71 0.79 0.59 0.75 0.75 0.79 0.79 Delay/Veh: 41.7 35.3 35.3 59.6 55.2 55.5 52.9 41.7 51.1 48.4 48.4 48.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1. 00 1.00 1. DO 1. 00 1. DO 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.7 35.3 35.3 59.6 55.2 55.5 52.9 41.7 51.1 48.4 48.4 48.4 LOS by Move: D 0+ D+ E+ E+ E+ D- D 0- 0 0 HCM2k95thQ: 29 27 27 15 18 15 23 16 21 18 19 19 Trafh 7.8.0115 Copyright (0) 2005 Dowling AssoOales, Inc. Ucensad to FEHR "PEERS, ~vn.le7 COMPARE Tue Apt 24 10:48:42 2f)(J7 Las Pal... Version 1: AplI9. 200T Pege3-1 I..8veI Of Senri<:e ~ Report 2ODO HCM ClpIlralons (Future Volume AllemaUve) E>ls1Ing PM Intersection #1: Homestead Rd/Stelllng Rd SigneJ-ProteclJRIghm.-lndude Inl1lal Vol: 129 340 233- Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 ~ 4 .~ ~ ~ Signol_Protecl SIgnaI-Protecl Initial Vol: Lane.: RJgh\sooIndude Vol Cnt 0eI8: n/a Rights-Include Lanes: Initial Vol: ..f Cycle TIme (see): 130 ~ 374- 0 343 -4 Loss Time (see): 12 ~ 0 568 -+ Crltoal VIC: 0.914 ..- 566- -:r Avg Cril Del (secIveh): 64.2 T 0 233 0 .. Avg Delay (_h): 54.8 .- 66 LOS: 0- ~ ~ t ,. ~ Lanes: 2 0 0 lnilal Vol: 357 794.H 83 S1gnol_PratecllRighte-lncIude Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L r R L T R L T R L r R ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 I~--------------I 1---------------1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ____________I_____~---------I 1---------------11---------------11---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 357 794 83 233 340 129 374 568 233 66 566 343 Growth Adj: 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 357 794 83 233 340 129 374 568 233 66 566 343 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 Approved: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 357 794 83 233 340 129 374 568 233 66 566 343 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 pHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 357 794 83 233 340 129 374 568 233 66 566 343 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 357 794 83 233 340 129 374 568 233 66 566 343 PCE Adj: 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 357 794 83 233 340 129 374 568 233 66 566 343 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 I-----------~---I 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.92 1. 00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 1.81 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 40 0.60 1. 00 1.22 0.78 Final Sat. : 3150 3350 350 1750 1900 1750 1750 2623 1016 1750 2303 1396 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.24 0.24 0.13 0.18 0.07 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.04 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** .*..... **** Green Time: 20.4 33.7 33.7 18.9 32.2 32.2 30.4 52.3 52.3 13.0 35.0 35.0 Volume/Cap: 0.72 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.72 0.30 0.91 0.54 0.54 0.38 0.91 0.91 Delay/Veh: 57.3 59.6 59.6 89.1 50.2 40.1 73.2 30.0 30.0 56.1 58.6 58.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 57.3 59.6 59.6 89.1 50.2 40.1 73.2 30.0 30.0 56.1 58.6 58.6 LOS by Move: E+ E+ E+ F D D E C C E+ E+ HCM2k95thQ: 16 33 33 24 24 9 33 22 22 6 36 36 Traflx7.8.0115 Copyright (c:l2005 Dowling Associates. Inc. Licensed 10 FEHR & PEERS, R~JJ3 COMPARE Tue Apr 24 10:48:42. 2007 Page 3-2 Las Palmas Yenlon 1: ApI 9, 2007 Intersection #1: Homestead Rd/Stelling Rd SIgnaI.Prol9ctlAight&-Inalude 132 403 233- ~14 ~ ~.1~ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HeM Operallan. (Future YoIume Alternative) Baclcground PM InIUal YoI: Lanes: Signal-Prolecl SignaJ.oProlecl Inlliall,lol: Lanes: Righls-Include Vol Cnt Dale: nle Rlghtsoolnclucle Lanes: Initial Vol: J- Cycle Time (S8C): 130 1.= 375- 0 343 ~ Lo8a Time lllel:): 12 0 569 -.. Crl_VIC: 0.931 +- 568- ~ Avg Crit Del (secNeh): 66.7 1= 0 251 ~ Avg Delay (oec/lleh): 57.1 114 LOS: E+ ~ ~ t t--- ~ Lanes: Inllial Vol: 2 0 0 366 836- 93 Signal-Prolecbl'liltlts-lnclude . Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------1 1---------------11---------------11---------------1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 357 794 B3 233 340 129 374 56B 233 66 566 343 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 Initial Bse: 357 794 83 233 340 129 374 568 233 66 566 343 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved: 9 42 10 0 63 3 1 1 18 18 2 0 Initial Fut: 366 B36 93 233 403 132 375 569 251 B4 56B 343 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 366 836 93 233 403 132 375 569 251 84 568 343 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 366 836 93 233 403 132 375 569 251 B4 568 343 peE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 FinalVolume: 366 836 93 233 403 132 375 569 251 B4 56B 343 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------11---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.92 1. 00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 1. 79 0.21 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.31 0.63 1.00 1.23 0.77 E'inal Sat. : 3150 3329 370 1150 1900 1750 1750 2567 1132 1150 2306 1392 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 I----------~----I 1---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.25 0.25 0.13 0.21 0.08 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.05 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves: *,,*** **'** **'** **** Green Time: 19.0 35.1 35.1 18.6 34.7 34.7 29.9 51. 8 51. B 12.6 34.4 34.4 Volume/Cap: 0.80 0.93 0.93 0.93 O.BO 0.28 0.93 0.56 0.56 0.50 0.93 0.93 Delay/Veh: 62.9 60.9 60.9 93.5 52.9 38.1 77 .1 30.7 30.7 58.0 61.5 61.5 User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh.: 62.9 60.9 60.9 93.5 52.9 38.1 77.1 30.7 30.7 58.0 61.5 61.5 LOS by Move: E E E F D- D+ E- C C E+ E HCM2k95thQ: 17 35 35 24 29 9 34 23 23 8 37 37 Trafflx 7.8.0115 Copyright (e) 2005 DowlIng _al.o, Inc. Ucensed 10 FEHR & PEERS, Rdsl~ COMPARE Tue AfJr 24 10:48:-422007 LasPalmas Versle>n1; AprI9, 2007 Page 3-3 Level 01 Service Campulallon Report 2000 HeM Oper_ (Future Volume Altemallve) Project PM Intersection #1: Homestead Rd/Stelling Rd -Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: ' L T R L T R L T R L T R ---------------------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 1Q 10 7 Hi 10 --~---------I---------------I 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 25 Jan 2007 << Base Vol: 357 794 83 233 340 129 374 568 233 66 566 343 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 357 794 83 233 340 129 374 568 233 66 566 343 Added Vol: 1 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 Approved: 9 42 10 0 63 3 1 1 18 18 2 0 Initial Fut: 367 837 99 233 404 132 375 569 252 94 568 343 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 367 837 99 233 404 132 375 569 252 94 568 343 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 367 837 99 233 404 132 375 569 252 94 56B 343 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 367 837 99 233 404 132 375 569 252 94 568 .343 ------------1---------------1 I----------~----I 1---------------1 I------~--------I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900" 1900 1900 1900 1900 "Adjustment: 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.37 0.63 1.00 1.23 0.77 Final Sat.: 3150 3308 391 1750 1900 1750 1750 2563 1135 1750 2306 1392 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.25 0.25 0.13 0.21 0.08 0.21 0.22 0.22 0.05 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 19.0 35.3 Volume/Cap: 0.80 0.93 Delay/Veh: 62.9 61.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 62.9 61.1 LOS by Move: E E HCM2k95thQ: 17 35 Signai-Pro~ghts-IncI"de Initial Vol: 132 040-4 233- Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 ~~t~~ Signol-PralOCl S1gn....Prolec:l lnIUaI Vol: Lanes: Righ1s-lncll.de Vol Cn! Dale: 1/2512007 R1gh.....lndude Lanes: lnitialVd: J- Cycle Ttme (see): 130 ~ 37S- 0 3013 ~ lDllI TIIIl8 (S80): 12 J.- 569 ~ CrII\calvtC: 0.933 +- 56r' r Avg CriI Del (seoJveh): 67.1 1= 0 252 0 AVO Delay (seclVeh): 57.3 ll.f LOS: E+ ~ ~ t ,.. ~ Lanes: 2 0 0 1n/laI Vol: 367 837~ 99 Signol.P,otecURights-lndl.de **** **** 35.3 0.93 61.1 1. 00 61.1 E 35 12.5 0.56 60.2 1. 00 60.2 C 18.6 0.93 94.1 1.00 94.1 F 24 34.8 0.80 52.8 1. 00 52.8 D- 29 34.8 0.28 38.1' 1.00 38.1 D+ 9 29.9 51.7 0.93 0.56 77.6 30.8 1. 00 1. 00 77.6 30.8 E- 34 51.7 0.56 30.8 1. 00 30.8 C 23 23 9 **** 34.3 0.93 61. 9 1.00 61. 9 E 34.3 0.93 61. 9 1.00 61. 9 E 37 37 TraJllx7.8.0115 CopyrIght (e) 2005 DowlIng Associates, Inc. Ucensed to FEHR & PEERS. ~l&O COMPARE Tue I>pr 24 10:48:<42 2007 PIIlle 3-4 la6 Palmas Version 1: AprI 9, 2007 Level Of SIlrvIce Computation Report 2000 HCM Oper.Uons (Future Volume Altematlve) ElcistingPM Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd! Stelling Rd Slgn....ProlectJRighls.lncIude initial Vol: 238 468 334'- Lanes: 10201 ~-4+~~ Signal-Protecl Signal-Protecl initial Vol: Lanes: Rights-lndude Vol Cnt Dale: nla Rights-lnclude Lanes: InilialVoI: .J- Cycle TIme (see): 115 'l 363- 0 241 ~ I.o&s lime (sec): 12 ..t- O 1 1085 3 ....... C~tIcaI VlC: 0.928 -+- 2 988-' :{ AVIl CrIt Del (aeclveh): 60.7 l 0 240 AVIl Delay (secllleh): 51.6 2 436 LOS: [).. ~ ~ t ~ t*" Lanes: 1 0 0 lnitiel Vol: 282 427- 362 Signal.ProleclJRig",..lnclude 'Street Name: Stelling Rd Stevens Creek Blvd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound. Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 I---------------II---------------j I-~-------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 282 427 362 334 468 238 363 1085 240 436 988 241 Growth Adj: 1.00 LOO 1.00 LOO LOO LOO 1.00 LOO 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 282 427 362 334 468 23B 363 lOBS 240 436 988 241 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 282 427 362 334 468 23B 363 1085 240 436 988 241 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 282 427 362 334 468 238 363 1085 240 436 988 241 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 282 427 362 334 468 238 363 1085 240 436 98B 241 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVo1ume: 282 427 362 334 468 238 363 1085 240 436 988 241 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1. DO 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1. 00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 1. 00 1. 06 0.94 1. 00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1. 00 2.00 2.39 0.61 Final Sat. : 1750 2001 1697 1750 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 4500 1098 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.21 0.21 0.19 0.12 0.14 0.21 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.22 0.22 crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 27.2 26.4 26.4 23.7 22.9 22.9 25.7 30.6 30.6 22.3 27.2 27.2 Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.62 0.68 0.93 0.71 0.51 0.71 0.93 0.93 Delay/Veh; 44.6 59.5 59.5 74.6 43.6 48.1 71. 9 39.9 36.9 47.4 54. 4 .54.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1. 00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 AdjDel/Veh: 44.6 59.5 59.5 74.6 43.6 48.1 71. 9 39.9 36.9 47.4 54.4 54.4 LOS by Move: D E+ E+ E D 0 E D D+ D 0- HCM2k95thQ: 18 2B 28 29 16 18 31 23 15 17 29 29 Tralllx 7.8.0115 Copyrlghl (c}2005 Dowling AssocI8IeS, lno. LIcensed to FEHR &. PEERS, Rc1~ 1 COMPARE Tue Apr 24 10:~:42 2007 Page 3-5 LasPalmas Version 1: ApI 9, 2007 Intersection #3: S1evens Creek Blvd! Stelling Rd J.eyel Of ServIce Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (FUI1I'8 VolUme -"-live) Bac:kgralmd PM Signal-ProtecllRlgh.....lnclude Initial Vol: 2n 527 36(J"'H Lanea: 10201 -..J-4+~~ SlgnaI..Protec:1 SIgn....ProIecl Initial Vol: Lanes, Rights-lnclude Vol Onl Dale: 9/1/1997 Ri9h....lnclude l8nes: initial Vol: J- Cycle Time (see): 115 ~ ~50- 0 2~1 ~ LollI Time (1ltC): 12 J.- 1261 -+ CriticalVIC: 1.071 -4- 2 1203- 0 -:r Avg Cril Del (eec:lveh): 97.3 ~ 0 313 -. Avg Delay (seclveh): 71.6 .- 2 507 LOS: E Lanes: initial Vol: ~~t,.~ o 0 321 510- 372 SigrlaJ-ProtectlRlghu..Jnclude Street Name: Stelling Rd Stevens Creek Blvd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L T R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 I--------------~I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 1 Sep 1997 << 5:15 - 6:15 PM Base Vol: 282 42"7 362 334 468 238 363 1085 240 436 988 241 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 282 427 362 334 468 238 363 1085 240 436 988 241 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Approved: 39 83 10 26 59 39 87 176 73 71 215 0 Initial Fut: 321 510 372 360 527 277 450 1261 313 507 1203 241 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 321 510 372 360 527 277 450 1261 313 507 1203 241 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 321 510 372 360 527 277 450 1261 313 507 1203 241 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 321 510 372 360 527 277 450 1261 313 507 1203 241 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00.0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 1.13 0.87 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.48 0.52 Final Sat.: 1750 2138 1560 1750 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 4664 934 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 J---------------I 1---------------1 Capacity Analysis Module; Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.24 0.24 0.21 0.14 0.16 0.26 0.22 0.18 0.16 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves: **** Green Time: 25.6 25.6 Volume/Cap: 0.82 1.07 Delay/Veh: 55.8 96.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 55.8 96.9 LOS by Move: E+ F HCM2k95thQ: 22 37 Traftlx 7.8.0115 **** **** 25.6 1. 07 96.9 1.00 96.9 F 37 22.1 1.07 115.7 1.00 115.7 F 36 22.1 0.72 47.1 1. 00 47.1 D 19 22.1 0.82 59.7 1.00 59.7 E+ 23 27.6 32.0 1. 07 0.79 107.9 41.3 1. 00 1. 00 107.9 41.3 F D 42 27 Copprlghl (c) 2005 DowlIng AssocillleS, Inc. **** 32.0 0.64 39.4 1.00 39.4 D 20 23.3 27.7 0.79 1.07 50.4 89.6 1. 00 1. 00 50.4 89.6 D F 20 39 27.7 1.07 89.6 1.00 89.6 F 39 Licensed to FEHR & PEERS, RcJ~n:Jl2 COMPARE Tue Ap< 24 10:48:42 2007 Las PaImal; Version 1 : Aprll 9, 2007 Page 3-8 Level 01 SeMce COfIllUIallon Report 2OllO HCM Operations (Fublre Volume A1temative) Project PM Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd! Stelling Ad Sig1aI-ProlecllRV1ls.lnclude Initial Vol: 273 - 528 361- Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 ~""t~~ Signal.Protect SiglaI=Protect Initial Vol: Lanes: Rights:lnclude Vol Cnt Dale: 911n997 RighIs>olnclude Lanes: lni1ialVal: .Jo 0'de TIme (see): 115 ~ 45r 0 243 ~ koS$ TIITlt (see): 12 J- 0 t 1281 3 --'+ Critical VlC: 1.074 -+- 2 1203'" 0 r Avg Crit Del (sec/Veh): 99.3 T 0 313 Avg Delay (sec/Veh): 72.2 2 507 LOS: E ~ -+t t ~ ,. Street Name~ Stelling Rd Stevens Creek Blvd Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L r R L T R L T R L T R ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 1 Sep 1997 << 5:15-6:15 PM Base Vol: 2B2 427 362 334 468 238 363 lOBS 240 436 988 241 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 282 427 362 334 46B 238 363 lOBS 240 436 9BB 241 Added Vol: 0 2 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 Approved: 39 83 10 26 59 39 87 176 73 71 215 0 Initial Fut: 321 512 372 361 52B 278 452 1261 313 507 1203 243 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 321 512 372 361 528 278 452 1261 313 507 1203 243 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 321 512 372 361 528 278 452 1261 313 507 1203 243 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 321 512 372 361 528 278 452 1261 313 507 1203 243 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 _0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 1.14 0.86 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.4B 0.52 Final Sat.: 1750 2142 1556 17503BOO 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 4658 941 ------------1---------------1 1---------------1 1---------------1 I-------~-------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.24 0.24 0.21 0.14 0.16 0.26 0.22 0.18 0.16 0.26 0.26 Crit Moves: **** Green Time.: 25.6 25.6 Volume/Cap: 0.83 1.07 De1ay/Veh: 56.1 97.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 56.1 97.9 LOS by Move: E+ F HCM2k95thQ: 22 37 Lanes: 1 0 0 -'nltial Val: 321 512''' 372 SIgnal-ProlecllRlghl1>olnclude *"*** **** 25.6 1. 07 97.9 1. 00 97.9 F 37 22.1 1.07 116.6 1. 00 116.6 F 36 32.0 0.79 41. 3 1. 00 41.3 F D 43 27 22.1 0.72 47.1 1.00 47.1 D 19 22.1 27.7 0.83 1.07 59.8 108.7 1. 00 1. 00 59.8 108.7 E+ 23 32.0 0.64 39.4 1.00 39.4 D 20 **** 23.3 27.7 0.791.07 50.4 90.7 1.00 1. 00 50.4 90.7 D F 20 39 27.7 1. 07 90.7 1.00 90.7 F 39 licensed to FEHR & PEERS, R~JP Traflix 7.8.0115 Copyright (e) 2005 Dowling Assoehltes, Inc. ~ FEHR & PEERS "AU..,UAfI.. U.SUUA.U ATTACHMENT C QUEUE ANALYSIS 13-84 Maximum Queue Estimation for: Major Street Left-Turn Input Data 5 1 1123 0.87 1 30 Is a Traffic Signal Located on Major Street Within 1/4 mi of intersection? I (Enter 1 if yes; 0 if no) Output IEstimated Maximum Queue vehicles I 1 3 - 85 . ARBOR RESOURCES Professional Arboricultural Consulting & Tree Care A TREE INVENTORY AND REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION AT l0855N. STELLING ROAD CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: Gary Chao, Associate Planner Community Development Department City of Cupertino . 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Prepared by: David L. Babby, RCA ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #399 ISA CertifiedArborist #WE-400 lA April 17 , 2007 P.O. Box 25295, San Mateo, California 94402 . Email: arborresources@comcast.net Phone: 650.654.3351 . Fax: 650.240.0777 . Licensed Contractor #796763 13 - 86 David L. Babby. Registered Consulting Arborisi Apri117,2007 SECTION 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 5.0 5.1 5.2 EXlITBIT A B TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE. IN'TRODUCTION ................. ... ...... ... ............ ...~. ...... ....... 1 TREE COUNT AND COMPOSITION ..................................1 SUITABILITY FOR TREE PRESERVATION .......................3 PROJECT REVIEW ........................................................ 4 Proposed Tree Removals.. . ... .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . .. . .. ... . . .. .... . .. ... 4 Replacement/Mitigation Strategy........... ...........; ............. 5 Applicant's Arborist Letter. ... ............ .... .... ...................6 Landscape Plan. . .. . .. . ...... . ... .... . . ..... ..... .. ................ ...... 6 RECOMM:E.ND"ATIONS .. .... ......... ............. ....." ... .~. ............ 7 Design Guidelines..... ........................................ .......... 7 Protection Measures Before and During Development........... 9 EXHIBITS TITLE TREE INVENTORY TABLE SITE MAP 1 13 - 87 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist April17,2007 1.0 INTRODUCTION I have been retained by the City of Cupertino Community Development Department to perform the following in connection with the proposed 22 lot subdivision at 10855 N. Stelling Road, Cupertino: [1] identify the species, size and condition of trees in proximity to the proposed development; [2] review the proposed landscaping plan; [3] comment on a letter by Mr. Michael Kennon of Valley Crest; and [4] provide protection measures for trees being retained. I visited the. site on 4/11/07 and 4/16/07, and this report presents my analysis and recommendations. Trees inventoried for this report are situated either on the subject site or have canopies overhanging the site from neighboring properties. Small fruit trees, nut-bearing trees, and other various small trees were tallied. Documents reviewed for this report include [1] Sheet 2 (Tentative Map) by JMH Weiss, Inc., dated 1/30/07; [2] Sheet Cl (Grading and Drainage Plan) also by JMH Weiss, dated 1/25/07; [3] Sheet A1.1 (Site Plan) by Dahlin Group, dated 1/25/06; [4] Sheet L1.1 (Conceptual Site and Tree Plan) by SSA Landscape Architects, dated 1/25/07; and [5] the letter by Mr. Michael Kennon of Valley Crest (not dated). The trees' locations, approximate canopy dimensions, 1 and assigned numbers are presented on a copy of the Tentative Map in Exhibit B. 2.0 TREE COUNT AND COMPOSITION Sixteen trees of eleven various specIes were inventoried for this report. They are sequentially numbered as 1 thm 16, and the table presented on the next page identifies their name, number and percentage. Specific information obtained for each tree can be viewed in Exhibit A (Tree Inventory Table). I The canopy dimensions for trees shown on the project plans are much smaller than their actual size; refer to the sizes identified within the table in Exhibit A for their spread. 10855 N. Stelling Road, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 1 of 12 13 - 88 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist April 17, 2007 , , .. . P~RC~NT TREE NUMBERl$) I "NAME "'. ..,' COUNT OF tOTAL Canary Island Date Palm 4 1 6% Chinese Pistache 5. 16 2 13% Coast Live Oak 1, 2, 6, 10 4 25% Digger Pine 11 1 6% Hackberry 3 1 6% Holly Oak 13 1 6% Hollywood Juniper 14 1 6% Lombardy Poplar 8,9 2 13% Olive Tree 7 1 6% Pecan 10 1 6% Red lronbark (Eucalyptus) 15 1 6% Total 16 100% Three of the inventoried trees are defmed as "specimen trees" per Section 14.18.020(1) of the Ordinance and include #1, 2 and 6. Each is a coast live oak with trunk diameters greater than 10 inches measured at 54 inches above grade. Five trees are not shown on the project plans. They include #5, 8-10 and 16, and their locations shown on the map ill Exhibit B are roughly approximate and must not be construed as being surveyed or entirely accurate. 10855 N. Stelling Road, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 2 of 12 . 13 - 89 David L. Bahby, Registered Consulting Arborist April 17, 2007 Tree #15 overhangs the site by approximately 10 feet and its trunk is situated on the neighboring southern property. There are an additional seven eucalyptus trees also situated on the neighboring property, however, these trees are setback a sufficient distance from the project and are not expected to be impacted. Note that one of these trees is dead and should be removed for safety purposes; it is located at the west side of the row. The site is heavily vegetated with approximately 57 additional small trees which are fruit- beariDg, nut-bearing, and other various types. Due to their amount, I tallied (rather than inventoried) each one and the following list identifies their species and amount: · Thirty-three flowering plums (Prunus sp.) · One avocado (Persea americana) · Two orange trees (Citrus sinensis) · Three holly oaks (Quercus ilex) - one to two inches in diameter · Eight olive trees (Olea europaea) · Seven loquat (Eriobotryajaponica) · Two English walnuts (Juglans regia) · One tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima) 3.0 SUITABILITY FOR TREE PRESERVATION Each tree has been assigned either a. "high," "moderate" or "low" suitability for preservation rating as a means to cumulatively measure their physiological health, structural integrity, location, size and specie type. These ratings and applicable tree numbers are presented below; note that the "high" category is comprised of two trees, the "moderate" category six trees, and the "low" category eight trees. IDl!b: Applies to trees #4 and 6. They appear vigorous, in stable condition, and have a high potential of providing a long-term contribution to the site. 10855 N. Stelling Road, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 3 of 12 13 - 90 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist April 17, 2007 Moderate: Applies to trees #1, 2, 5, 10, 12 and 13. They appear worthy of retention, but their longevity and contribution is less than those of high suitability and more frequent care is needed during their remaining life span. Low: Applies to trees #3, 7-9, 11 and 14-16. These trees are either dead or predisposed to irreparable health problems and/or structural defects that are expected to worsen regardless of measures employed. 4.0 PROJECT REVIEW 4.1 Proposed Tree Removals The proposed plans indicate that all trees on-site, but #4, will be removed; this includes trees #3, 5, 7-14 and 16. Tree #4 is a large and healthy date palm proposed for relocation; it is approximately 40 feet tall and has a stout 30-inch trunk: diameter. Based on my evaluation, I find that the loss of all trees proposed for removal but #1, 2 and 6 would conform to Section 14.18.180 (Review Standards) of the City Ordinance. Trees #1, 2 and 6 are all coast live oaks and regulated by City Ordinance; their respective trunk diameters are 22.5, 21 and 16.5 inches. To achieve their adequate protection, the proposed design will need to be revised so no grading, trenching (e.g. drainage, utilities, etc.), or soil disturbance (including any overcut), occurs within a minimal distance from the trunks of five times their diameter when only one side is impacted, and seven times their diameter when two or more sides are impacted. Finish grading should also be avoided within these setbacks; if this is not possible, the work should be reviewed for impacts prior to project approval. In addition to the above setbacks, the homes should be established a minimum distance from the trunks of five times their diameters. Additionally, they should be designed so that sufficient clearance from the canopies, including scaffolding, is achieved to the 10855 N. Stelling Road, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 4 of 12 13 - 91 David L. Bobby, Registered Consulting Arborist April 17, 2007 extent that their form can remain intact (this should be determined and verified on-site by the architect). I recommend the roofs are also pitched away from the trees. I also recommend the sections of new homes constructed within a minimal distance from the trunks often times their diameters (e.g. a 24-inch diameter tree would have a 20-foot distance) should be established on a pier and above-grade beam foundation in which the beam is literally established on top of or above existing soil grade and no excavation occurs except for the piers (i.e. a no-dig design). Any fill placed around the foundation should not extend beyond 24 inches from its edge. Regarding the future driveway, it should be fully pelVious (including base material) and established at least five to six feet from tree #2's trunk. Additionally, any section within 15 feet from the trunk should be established on top of existing soil grade (to include base materials, curb, gutter and edging) with no more than a four-inch vertical soil cut. To help achieve this design, Tensa.r@ BX Geogrid (www.tensarc01p.com) should be considered. 4.2 Replacement/Mitigation Strategy I recommend mitigation for all trees to be removed except for #9 (dead poplar) and #11 (pine falling over). A strategy for mitigating the loss oftrees #3,5,7,8,10,12-14 and 16 includes the installation of one tree of 3 6-inch box size for each one removed, which would account for nine new trees of 36-inch box size. In the event trees #1, 2 and/or 6 were approved for removal, a strategy to mitigate their loss involves the installation of two trees of 48-inch box size per each removed. Please note that due to the site constraints and relatively minimal planting spaCe, the installation of large specimen (i.e. field-grown) oak trees does not appear feasible, except possibly in the common area at the end of the driveway; however, if a large coast live oak was planted there, the turfwould need to be omitted from the design. Regarding the relocation of trees #1, 2 and/or 6, I do not find trees #1 and 2 are viable candidates due to their condition and unfavomble height reduction for overhead power 10855 N. Stelling Road, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 5 of 12 1 3 - 92 David L. Babby. Registered Consulting Arborist April 17. 2007 line clearance. However, tree #6 is a potential viable candidate to relocate at the common area at the end of the driveway; in doing so, the turf must be omitted from the design and the palm tree carefully placed to avoid deterring the future growth and natural form of the oak. 4.3 Applicant's Arborist Letter Regarding the letter by Mr. Kennon of Valley Crest, he provides statements regarding trees assigned #2 and 4. Tree #4 is the tall date palm and he recommends it be relocated elsewhere on-site; the plans indicate this will occur and I agree with this course of action. Tree #2 is a 21-inch diameter coast live oak that he recommends for removal due to its location beneath the power lines and its poor stmcture. I acknowledge that the tree is situated beneath the power lines and has been undesirably pruned over the years to achieve power line clearance, an action that will continue to occur throughout the tree's life span. I also acknowledge that the tree's structural integrity is poor partly due to past pruning activities and partly. due to the weak attachment of the two western leaders. However, even with considering these items, I recommend it is retained and designed around for the following reasons: [1] the tree appears very healthy and capable of serving as a valuable and irreplaceable amenity to the site and neighborhood for the foreseeable future, and [2] criteria set forth within Section 12.18.180 (Review.Standards) of the City's Ordinance does not seemingly support its removal. 4.4 Landscape Plan The proposed landscape design is identified on Sheet Ll.l (Conceptual Site and Tree Plan) and my comments are as follows: . Two date palms (Phoenix dactylifera) are proposed for installation at the front entrance on each side of the future driveway. Overhead at these locations are the high-voltage electrical lines routed north to south along the front of the property. As this type of tree can reach a height of about 65 feet, they would not be appropriate at their proposed location. 10855 N. Stelling Road, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 6 of 12 13 - 93 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist April 17, 2007 · The relocated palm (tree #4) is proposed for relocation about one-foot from a future walkway. Given the tree's size, it will need much more space than this upon being replanted, and in doing so, should be shifted further east and possibly the turf area reduced in size; a professional tree moving company should be consulted in identifying the space required for proper installation, watering and drainage to achieve the greatest success for long-term survival. · Regarding trees proposed for installation, it is my oprmon that they are appropriately selected for a condominium development site and will provide an outstanding, immediate and future tree landscape that can potentially thrive into the distant future. Additionally, I find that the quantity, type and size of trees favorably exceed mitigating those approved for removal. 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendations prese~ted within this section serve as guidelines for achieving adequate protection of trees that will be retained. They should be carefully followed and incorporated into construction plans. Please note that any or all recommendations are subject to revision upon reviewing any revised plans. 5.1 Design Guidelines 1. The location, accurate canopy dimension, and assigned number of each inventoried tree should be shown on Sheets C1.0, Sheet 2, and LJ.1. I also recommend the location, number and canopy dimension of each retained tree is shown on Sheet AI.I. 2. Recommendations presented in Section 4.0 of this report should be followed to achieve the retention and protection of trees #1, 2 and 6. 3. On Sheets Cl.O, Sheet 2, and L1.1, I recommend an "X" is placed through each trunk proposed for removal. 10855 N. Stelling Road, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 7 of 12 13 - 94 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist April 17, 2007 4. Walkways proposed beneath canopies of the oaks should be established entirely on top of existing soil grade (including curb, gutter, edging and forms). Any necessary vertical cut (though not advised) should not exceed four inches below existing soil grade. Additionally, direct compaction of the existing soil surface (i.e. subgrade) must be avoided (the subbase materials can be compacted, just not the subgrade). 5. The block wall proposed around the perimeter of the site and within a distance from the oak trees' trunks of 10 times their diameters must be of a pier and above-grade beam design in which spans between the piers are literally established above existing grade so no soil distuibance or excavation occurs between the piers. 6. This report arid any supplemental letters shall be incorporated into the tmal set of project plans, titled Sheets T-l, T-2, etc. (Tree Protection Instructions), and referenced on all site-related plans (i.e. Sheets 2, C1.0, A1.l and L1.1). 7. The permanent and temporary drainage design for the project should not require water being discharged beneath the trees' canopies. 8. Any revised plans should be reviewed for tree-related impacts prior to approval. Additionally, upon availability, the underground utility and irrigation design should also be reviewed. . 9. The proposed landscape design should conform to the following guidelines: a. Turf and plant material should be avoided beneath the oak canopies; as an alternative, I suggest a four-inch layer of coarse wood chips (decorative or from a tree company). b. Inigation beneath the oak canopies can impose adverse impacts and should be avoided. If applied, it should be low-volume, applied irregularly (such as only once or twice per week), temporary (such as no more than three years), and not strike within five feet of its trunks. Inigation should not strike the trunks of any other trees (new or existing). 10855 N. Stelling Road, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 8 of 12 13 - 95 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist April 17, 2007 c. Trenching for irrigation or lighting .should be avoided beneath the canopies. If necessary, they should be routed in a radial direction to the trunks. d. Stones, mulch and fencing should not be placed against the trunks of existing or new trees. Plastic ground cover should also be avoided beneath canopies. e. Tilling beneath canopies should be avoided, including for weed control. f. Bender board or other edging material proposed beneath the canopies should be established on top of existing soil grade (such as by using vertical stakes). 10. To achieve the greatest assurance of proper installation, all new trees shall be installed, including necessary irrigation, by an experienced and knowledgeable state-licensed landscape contractor (or a professional tree company). The work shall be performed to professional industry standards. 5.2 Protection Measures before and during Development 11. Due to the close proximity of activities among trees, a "project arborlsf,2 should be retained by the applicant or owner to assist in implementing and achieving compliance with all tree protection measures. 12. Prior to any grading, trenching or site clearing work. a pre-construction meeting shall be held on-site with the project arborist and contractor to discuss work procedures, protection fencing locations, limits of grading, staging areas, routes. of access, supplemental watering, mulching, locations for equipment washing, and other tree protection measures. 13. Tree protective fencing shall be installed prior to any grading. trem;hing or site clearing work, and its precise location must be determined and its placement approved by the project arborlst prior to the issuance of any grading or construction peImit It shall be comprised of six-foot high chain link mounted on eight-foot tall. two-inch diameter. steel posts that are driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet 2 The "project arborist" refers to an individual that is certified by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) andl~ is a member of the American Society of Consulting Arborists (ASCA). 10855 N Stelling Road. Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 9 of 12 13 - 96 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist April 17, 2007 apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout construction until final inspection. Please note that fencing will need to be established in two or more phases (e.g. once for demolition, once for construction, and possibly again for installing the driveway). 14. Unless otherwise approved, all development activities must be conducted outside the fenced areas (even after fencing is removed) and off unpaved areas beneath the canopies of Ordinance-size trees inventoried and not inventoried for this report. These activities include, but are not limited to, the following: demolition, grading, stripping of topsoil, trenching, equipment cleaning, stockpiling/dumping of materials, and equipment/vehicle operation and parking. 15. AI1y approved digging or trenching beneath a canopy shall be manually performed. In the event roots of two inches and greater are encountered during the process, the project arborist shall be consulted for appropriate action. 16. Prior to grading or excavating soil beyond a distance of 10 times the trunk diameters, a one-foot wide trench should be manually dug along the perimeter of a foundation or patio for the entire distance. The trench should be dug to the required depth, and shall occur where excavation will occur closest to the trunk Any roots encountered during the process should be cleanly severed against the soil cut. Roots with diameters of two inches and greater should be treated according to the project arborist. 17. Overcut should not exceed a distance of 24 inches from a foundation or utility trench. 18. Prior to construction, I recommend a four-inch layer of coarse wood chips (~- to %- inch in size) is manually spread on unpaved soil beneath the trees' canopies. These 'chips must not be placed against the trees' trunk, should remain throughout construction, and can be obtained from a tree service company and/or by contacting www.reuserinc.com. 10855 N. Stelling Road, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department PagelOof12 13 - 97 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist April 17, 2007 19. Any approved activity required beneath a tree's canopy (within and beyond the designated fenced areas) must be performed under direction of the project arborist. 20. All existing, unused lines or pipes beneath the canopies of retained trees should be abandoned and cut off at existing soil grade. 21. Piers or post-holes (whether for the walls, fencing or structures) should be established as far from the trees' trunks as possible where within a distance of 10 times the trunk diameters. For digging the fIrst three feet below grade, I recommend a post-hole digger is used; in the event a root two inches and. greater in diameter is encountered, the hole should be resituated. Digging below three feet from grade can be drilled. 22. Soil extracted from any pier hole or trench should not be placed against Ii. tree's trunk, or remain on undisturbed ground beneath a canopy. 23. Each recommendation that is presented within Section 5.1 of this report and 1S applicable to the actual development ofthe site shall be followed. 24. Throughout development, supplemental water should be supplied to the retained trees; the project arborist shall determine the specific trees, intervals, amounts and application methods. 25. The relocation of tree #4 (and tree #6, if applicable) must be performed by a professional tree service company experienced with relocating trees, and under the supervision of an individual certified by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA); all recommendations provided by the company to achieve successful transplant are followed. 26. The pruning and removal of trees shall be performed under the direction of the project arborist. The work must be performed under the supervision of an individual certified by the ISA (and not performed by construction personnel). Any tree stumps being 10855 N. Stelling Road, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department Page 11 of 12 13 - 98 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist Apri117,2007 EXHmIT A: TREE INVENTORY TABLE 10855 N. Stelling Road. Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department 13 - 99 TREE . NO; TREE INVENTORY TABLE ,. TREE NAME 8.~ i "; --. ... . I>. e.~ t ... '0] !il~ iScE 1] ...0 l:: o .~ ~'i' M~ ~.. ......, f ~ .. t;>1l =::i ~:c .... bll '5 ;;E' C/J ., '-" 3l ~ ::I 6 'u " I>. Vl C 8 ell :g> -< ::I o 00.... ..1:; 'lii l!t ... 0 j ct. --. lil ~ .~ Ib ~~ atf - " -;11l .El 'b o a:. =,0 .!:I 0 CI1.C --. .. <Il. ... o ~ ga:. .- 0 .~ .J -g ~ 811l ~~ =:0 .,0 ,,0 ::c:::> "C !! ~ gj s:>. II .s,,,, ......r o <Il b~ '-00 ~:I! B II J:: ,_::" ;d '~ ;~ 6b to::._ C <II 8~ "'''C U 4) .g 8: t:l e ~~ 'i .. gfS 0';:: 0 .- 0 -g~ 8.1;j =~ e 0 ~ o. 0.8 g .:d t>D ~ 00 .. 'lii e ',= - ~ ~ o .~ u,.-;. ~4:l ....'-' Cll"C 5 os ._ G) t11~ Hackberry (Celtis sp.) Comments: Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis ) Comments: Coast Live Oak (Quercus a . olia) Comments: Olive Tree (Olea euro aea) Comments: Tree has been "topped." Comments: Lombardy Poplar (Populus n. 1ta1ica') 0"10 Comments: Tree is dead and should be removed Site: 10855 N. Stelling Road, CupertJno Prepared for: CIty of Cupel1Jno Comm. Develop.. Depart. Prepared by: DBVid L. Babby, RCA 1of2 Aprll17, 2007 13 - 100 TREE INVENTORY TABLE TREE NO;, --. ~ .:d 00 :H 'I:l G) 1ii .g '" W "d '" ~:~ "'::: 0 :a~ d-.... 8 .; :;;;'~ .'::1 g >0 0..,-" c .sa -;j" t'i' <II 0 et:5 P-4_ I, ~'.'~ 0"8 =::s ~~ JL~ ,- ." TREE NAME :Uti ~t.O I 0;; --. ... . s:>. 5~ ... .... B c G) ell ~~ O,E ~.g :;S .- .. :;S ...0 ;f2 .~ .... Co. o a u"" ~~ ..'-" ell'" E ., .~ ~ '" s:>. Wrn .,..., .. en ... o .i1: a:: Ib o ,'eF- o.z;:.Q SJ I:: ~ 8~ -Sa:. 118 ::C:::> i o o~ 'tb~ u<? j;!'.J ~-;t' lI} - .. l~ ",a:. s:5 00:::' '=' !J ~ u [~ ..sir) ...... o III " .q~ l!l:Il B II a::- ..........., .. '" - a.~ r:; <II o " ut:l .1> -g ;g ~ OP- o r:; ... ..... Q.. G) ~ c G) .9 u " I>. Vl c " ... OS :;;> -< c o ~€ 1ii 8- u. 0 o ... -1~ Comments: Comments: Chinese Pistache (Pistacia chinensis) 75% Comments: Beneath high-voltage lines and "topped" somtfune ago; has weak structure. Site: 10855 N. Stelling Road, CUpertino Prepared for: City of Cupertino Comm. Develop. Depart. Preparedby: David L. Babby, RCA 2of2 AprIl 17, 2007 13-101 David L. Booby. Registered Consulting Arborist April 17, 2007 EXHIBIT B: SITE MAP 10855 N. Stelling Road, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Department 13 - 1 02 10855 N. STELLING ROAD, CUPERTINO l"'f' +-- I I ! . (I I , 1, 1;1 "^,",...... /......,_1... , II .",."'" ;.. <"\""~~" > 'r' . . ',....,':';~~ : " ::.,:.-1, 'v ::...:.. m --..-. . + ". , ~ - - ) I I' , ., . Ii, = i i;' ~ I~ , i,' ! /. ~ } Ii:' ~ i I~ 'I II ,I : ~: ! I r ! I' ; ; , I JuNIPERO SERRA. FREEW^V (INTERSTATE 280) i " " Not to Scale U N I , I I , I I 13 - 103 13 - 104 Page 1 of2 Gary Chao From: Arbor Resources [arborresources@comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, May 19, 200710:13 AM To: Gary Chao Subject: 10855 N. Stelling Road Gary, I have reviewed the revised set of plans for this project and my comments are as follows: Tree #1: 22.5-inch diameter Coast Live Oak Plans identify retaining this tree; it appears this can likely be achieved provided the section of porch within eight feet of its trunk. is eliminated from design. Also, great care will be necessary during pruning so the tree's form remains intact. To accurately identify how much oftlIe canopy will require remov~ for construction, I recommend the tree is viewed again once story-poles can be erected, including for the porch. Tree #2: 2l-incb diameter Coast Live Oak It appears likely that this tree can be retained, though the front of the home will be "tucked" tightly under its canopy. Great care during the tree's pruning is also essential, and the construction team will need to work close to the branches during construction, particularly for exterior finishing work. A clear depiction of how the home will interface with the tree's canopy can be provided upon story-poles are erected, including for the porch. Tree #6: 16.5-inch diameter Coast Live Oak This tree is proposed for relocation within the common area at the end of the driveway. However, several modifications to the landscape design are necessary to protect the tree and promote a suitable growing environment. One involves either eliminating the decomposed granite (d.g.) walkway within eight feet of the trunk, or shifting the tree closer towards the street. . I favor shifting ~e tree closer towards the street to also allow for the date palms to grow without interfering with branches of the oak, and thus affecting the oak's ability to prosper in its growth and natural form (another option is to eliminate the date palms from the design in that area). Placement of the oak in relation to the walkway should also co nsider a pedestrian walking without interference of large, overhead limbs (such as those greater than four inches in diameter). Another modification involves the proposed turf. Because coast live oaks do not favor frequent watering of their root zone (except during times of significant root loss, which will occur from 13 - 1 05 6/21/2007 Page 2 of2 relocation), I recommend no turf is proposed within 15 feet from the tree's trunk (this is a minimum distance; possibly the entire turf area should be omitted to consider the long-term). Plants proposed within 15 feet from the trunk should also be drought-tolerant. The ground within eight feet of the trunk should contain no d.g. Rather, a four-inch layer of decorative wood chips should be spread on the ground and extend to 15 feet from the trunk (note that bark and gorilla hair should be avoided). Tree #4: Canary Island Date Palm The proposed location for the existing large palm will provide insufficient space for its successful relocation (e.g. root ball size, watering and drainage elements). Based on the site density, it does not appear possible to retain this tree. If this tre~ is to remain, an ISA certified. arborist with a professional tree moving company, such as' Valley Crest, should be consulted in identifying the space required for proper installation, watering and drainage to achieve the greatest success for long-term survival. Proposed Trees The current landscape plan identifies one date pahn would be installed in front of the property on the south side of the driveway. Overhead are high-voltage electrical lines, and as the tree can reach a height of about 65 feet, tins tree is not appropriate and would ultimately be killed as cutting of its top would result in its demise. The African sUmacs proposed along the front of the property are inherently prone to branch and limb failure, require frequent pruning, and have short-life spans. Additionally, they do grow wide canopies and would immediately conflict with the front porches and homes. For.these reasons, I reconunend they are not selected. I also .do not suggest the installation of the date palms along the buildings. At only two feet away, it seems that the tree will become an increasing conflict to the homes, and provide a safety issue as the trees mature. Possibly a more narrow and columnar tree should be considered if the desire is to plant trees against the buildings. David L. Babby, ReA Consulting Arborist 650-654-3351 13 - 106 6/21/2007 ORDER NO. : 0611002604-GJ EXHIBIT A The land referred to is situated in the County of Santa Clara, City of Cupertino, State of California, and 'is described as follows: PARCEL ONE: Commencing at a stake marked M. L. 2 standing on the Section line between Sections 11 and 12, Township 7 South, Range 2 West from which stake the common corner for Sections 11 and 12, 13 and 14 bears South 25.065 chains; thence along the section line between said Sections 11 and 12; North 5.003 chains to a stake marked N. L. 2; thence west 9.998 chains to a stake marked N. L. 1; thence South 00 06' East 5.003 chains to a stake marked M. L. 1; thence East 9.991 chains to the place of commencement. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the following described parcel of land: Beginning at a nail set in the dividing line betvveen Sections 11 and 12, Township 7 South, Rang 2 West, M. D. B. & M., distant thereon North 1809.29 feet from a monument set at the common corner for Sections 11, 12, 13 and 14 of said Township 7 South, Range 2 West; thence from said point of beginning due North along said section line for a distance of 175.20 feet to a nail; thence leaving said last mentioned line and running due West 659.87 feet to a 3/4 inch iron pipe; thence South 00 06' East 330.20 feet to a 3,4 inch iron pipe; thence due East 378.26 feet to a 3/4 inch iron pipe; thence due North 155.00 feet to a 3/4 inch iron pipe; thence due East 281.03 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL TWO: A portion of that parcel of land as described in the Deed to the State of California, recorded June 26, 1963 in Volume 6079, at page 741 of the Official Records of Santa Clara County, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeasterly comer of said parcel; thence along the Easterly line of said parcel South 00 52' 00" West, 35.95 feet; thence North 880 03' 22" West 23.13 feet; thence North 89029' 15" West, 141.67 feet; thence South 870 59' 35" West, 116.39 feet to the Southerly prolongation of the course described as "Due North 155.00 feet", in the Deed to Valley Bible Church of Santa Clara County, a religious corporation, recorded May 6, 1960 in Volume 4787, at page 195 in the of official Records of Santa Clara County; thence along said prolongated line North 00 57' 05" East, 42.64 feet to the Northerly line of said parcel (6079 Official Records, Page 741); thence along last said line South 890 02' 55" East, 280.97 feet to the point of commencement. 326-07-037 13 003 KG/SO/KH A326-07-026 13 - 107 N. STELLING ROAD \0, l.r), "'i: "1-' ! S 89'07'JO" E i 4.(10 . N 00"51"32" E lal.JJ' _ SECTION UNE--..... ""i:I N 01TJ2'50" E CENTfRUNi7 I S BB'OJ'2r E i . 23.89' 7" r' 92.09' _ ~ N OI'~"L:Jloo.ll.,r ~~.._89'29'15.!. 4.~' s08'5!!';" ~---r---- I PG&E EASEMENT I (6801 OR 474) IT[M /4 I I (8148 OR 608) (TEM /6 I I- t) i I~ I ~ I I Co) I I -1 I I I I I ~ I lei - I ,: I · I I~ ~ I tli I ~ I I APN 326-07-037 A=1.105:J: AC 10' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (8458 OR 648) (TEM /8 JUNJPERO SERRA fREEWAY -,L- . I I ~I ~, . ~I "- ; Co) APN 326-07-027 I I L -- N 00"52'JO" E 155.00' S 0I'49'J5" w i 42.64' . LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS - - - - PROPERTY UNE - SUBJECT PAReR PROPERTY UNE - ADJACENT PARCEl. MONUMENT UNE / CfNTERI../NE, AS NOTED - - - - - - - EASEMENT l1NE / TIE liNE z :::I o I 25' 50' I I SCALE: 1" = 50' 100' I EXHIBff j1' PlAT JMH WEISS, INC, CMI .f,"~ - SI&nIepw _ LaNl ~ 150 _ _leilani, s"~. 700 San ...... Cc 95113 (408) 286-45:15 FAX:( _) 266-4558 ....Jmhwreill.com SHEET , IY I JOB 458J owe NN/E,' f:DJob!ID458J-u. """--&uperlinoD.-oY.tIwg. IASf CDITf1J: 1iDIt,.Ian a 2tI07 4:3'pm II5ER: -......m, lrJIolAd v'17.1b (/MS rICh). IIkruIDft -. NT _ 5.1 (xt16) Environmental Consulting Services 18488 Prospect Road - Suite 1, Saratoga, CA 95070 Phone: (408) 257-1045 stanshe1l99@toast.net FAX: (408) 257-7235 March 8, 2007 Mr. Gary Chao Cupertino Planning Dept. 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Re: Noise Study Report for the Las Palmas Residential Development, Stelling Road, Cupertino Dear Mr. Chao, 1 have reviewed the acoustical aspects of the design documents for the subject project relative to the City of Cupertino and State of California multi-family residential noise planning requirements. This report presents the results of the noise study, which includes on-site noise monitoring, projection of future Ldn project noise levels, a description of architectural details relevant to noise protection performance, and general recommendations for compliance with City of Cupertino planning criteria [1] and California Title 24 Noise Insulation Standards [2]. PROJECT DESCRIPTION [3] The proposed Las 'Palmas residential development includes 9 three-bedroom attached units, 4 four- bedroom attached units, and 8 four-bedroom detached units, with 2-car garages on the ground floor in each unit, plus an additional 19 visitor parking spaces on site, The project site is on a 1.2-acre site bounded, on the. north by a church property, on the south by freeway 1-280, on the east by North Stelling Road, and on the east by a utility facility. There will be a single access road from North Stelling Road. At present there aretwo residential buildings on the site, which will be demolished. This report evaluates, the complete bttild-out scenario. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The primary source of noise at the east side of the project site is traffic on North Stelling Road adjacent to the site to the east and also the 1-280 freeway to the south. The freeway is depressed approximately 20 feet relative to the site elevation. Typical vehicle passby noise levels on site are 60-70 dBA at 50 feet near Stelling Road. Trucks, motorcycles, and poorly muffled vehicles produce peak levels 5 to 10 dBA higher on passby. There are no other significant noise sources in the project area, except routine sporadic noises, such as garbage collection. . Based upon site noise measurements, anticipated future traffic volumes, and noise modeling, the worst- case Design Noise Level for project residential units would be 78 dBA, with the installation of a noise barrier on the south property line. The Design Noise Level is the worst-case outdoor noise level the project structures with the highest noise exposures must mitigate to provide a satisfactory interior environment. To meet City of Cupertino residential noise criteria, described in the Noise Element of the Cupertino General Plan In the following general design measures must be met: . Title 24-specifies long-term interior noise levels not exceeding 45 Ldn due to exterior sources. Environmental Consulting Services .. .. .. Saratoga 13 -109 Las Palmas Residential Noise Study - North Stelling Road, Cupertino Page 2 of6 · Party wall assemblies between attached residential units must have a minimum 50 STC (Sound Transmission Class) rating. Standard STC ratings for different types of party wall constructions ate documented in References 6 and 7. · Floor/ceiling assemblies between attached residential units should have a minimum 50 IIC (Impact Insulation Class) rating, as well as a 50 STC rating. (TIlls regulation does not apply to this project, since the attached units are townhousesal1d have no floor/ceiling assemblies between residential units.) · According to Cupertino Noise Element st?J1dards, the outdoor residential environment should be protected to a level of 60 dBA Ldn [1), if possible with reasonable measures. NOISE MONITORING AND DESIGN NOISE LEVEL ANALYSIS' Field noise measurements on site were made during the morning commute period of March 2, 2007, ~ith a CEL-440 precision noise meter and analyzer, calibrated with a B & K Model 4230 Sound Level Calibrator. The measurement locations were chosen to represent tbe worst-case exposure of tbe residential units closest to the two major traffic sources bounding the project. Location 1 - the location ofthe northeast comer of the site at Building 3, one of the nearest residences to North Stelling Road, about 50 feet from the nearest lane Location 2 - the location of the southeast comer of the site at Building 4, one of the nearest residences to North Stelling Road, about 35 feet.from the nearest lane, and aiso adjacent to 1-280 freeway, approximately 80 feet from the nearest lane Location 3 - the location of the southwest comer of ~ite at Building 12, adjacent to 1-280 freeway, approximately 90 feet from the nearest lane Existing Noise Levels Noise levels were measured and are reported using percentile noise descriptors: l.90 (the background ' noise level exceeded 90 % of the time), LSD (the median noise level exceeded 50% of the time), Ll (the peak level exceeded 1% of the time), and Leg (the average energy-equivalentnoise level). Measured noise levels are presented in Exhibit 1 below. The r::;dn noiselevels were computed as the long-term averageofLeq using the typical daily traffic distribution in the area, with standard weigbted penalties for the nighttime hours. EXHIBIT 1 EXISTING NOISE LEVELS (dBA) North Stelling Road Residential Project Site - Cupertino Location 1.90 LSO Leq Ll Ldn 1. adjacent to N. Stelling, NE corner of site 62 67 69 73 69 2. adjacent to N. Stelling, SE corner of site 70 72 72 77 72 3. adjacent to 1-280. SW comer of site 74 75 76 79 76 Location 1 has direct exposure to N. Stelling Road traffic, and the noise levels reflect that. Location 2 represents the residential noise exposure on the project site at Building 4, which is exposed to both direct nearby N. Stelling traffic noise and steady background 1-280 noise, although it is partially shielded by the Stelling ROad bridge from some freeway noise. Location 3 represents the worst-case residential noise exposure on the project site for the units directly adjacent to and with a view of freeway 1-280 traffic, Environmental Consulting Services "* "* * Saratoga 13-110 Las Palmas Residential Noise Study - North Stelling Road, Cupertino Page 3 of6 Future Project Noise Levels The Design Noise Level is the outdoor noise level anticipated within the next ten years (2017) for the residential units experiencing the highest noise exposure~the maximum noise level that the building structures must mitigate. In this project the units closest to North Stelling and 1-280 would be exposed to the highest traffic noise levels, the Design Noise Level (DNL). Units partially protected by other buildings will have noise levels at least 8-10 dBA less. The DNL is computed basl?d on field measurements of present noise levels, projections offuture traffic noise increases, and modeled by an enhanced version of the National Cooperative Highway Research Board traffic noise model [5J. Existing daily traffic volumes are approximately 140,000 on 1-280 near the project, based on CALTRANS online counts [4]. Daily volumes on North Stelling Road are approximately 15,300 based on City traffic counts from year 2002 [4] and infonnal ECS counts during field work. It is assumed that traffic will increase a modest 2% per year, which would produce a total increase of 22% over the next ten years on N. Stelling and 1-280 freeway, including project-generated trips. With the expected increase in traffic on 1-280 and N. Stelling, noise modeling provided the anticipated 2017 project noise levels shown in Exhibit 2,an increase of less than 1 dB over present noise levels on 1-280 and about a 1 dB increase on N. Stelling Road, including project trips. Site noise levels would be highest at the residences in the southwest comer ofth.e site ~t are subject to significant direct noise from freeway, as well as those near and facing N. Stelling, particularly those rooms facing the roadways. In addition, exposures at the upper floor windows would be approximately 2 dB higher than ground-floor noise levels I b'ecauseofincreased direct reflections from the road surface. A masonry noise wall along the freeway property line is standard design procedure, but for comparison future noise levels without a noise wall are given in the 2nd and 4th columns of Exhibit 2. EXHIBIT 2 FUTURE NOISE LEVELS - Ldn (dBA) Las Palmas Residential Project - Cupertino . > 2nd /3rd . . Location Ground. Ground 2nd /3rd ., level - no level - Level- no Level- noise wall noise waD noise wall noise wall 1. Units in NE comer of site 70 70 72 72 2. Units near SE comer of site 73 70 75 74 3. Units along south property line 77 67 79 78 4. Units on interior of site 62-68 56-60 62-70 60-66 Several elements contribute significantly to the noise levels at the planned units: the unit placements and their relationship to the adjacent road and the freeway (with the location of a noise wall on the property line only 10-12 feet from tlle nearest structures), the living spaces on the 2nd and 3rd levels. With this site geometry, a noise wall will only provide noise protection aUhe ground level and very little at the 2nd and 3rd floor elevations. That is, even if a lO-foot wall is constructed, little noise protection would be provided to the windows on the upper floors. Therefore an eight-foot noise barrier would be reconIDlended on the freeway property line, which will reduce ground level traffic noise levels by 8-10 dBA. The resulting noise levels are shown in columns 3 and 5 of Exhibit 2, which shows that the estimated worst-case noise levels for units closest to and facing the freeway, the architectural Design Noise Leve4 would be 78 dBA for upper floor units. Areas further back from the roads, such as the interior areas, would have significantly lower noise levels than those near the freeway and N. Stelling Road. Environmental Consulting Services * * * Saratoga 13-111 Las Palmas Residential Noise Study - North Stelling Road, Cupertino Page 4 of6 It should be noted that to protect units near the west end of the noise barrier, the barrier should be extended about 80 feet along the freeway property line on the west end. Otherwise the freeway noise has a direct short path to the units around the end of the noise barrier, raisil1gnoise levels significantly in the area. As in any neighborhood, some non-traffic activities could cause sporadic disturbance to the project. However, the proximity to steady arterial traffic would provide a noise background covering most incidental noise on adjacent properties. STATE OF CALIFORNIA and CITY OF CUPERTINO RESIDENTIAL NOISE STANDARDS Existing noise criteria [1,2], require that new residential housing developments provide an interior Ldn noise level of 45 dBA or less due to exterior noise sources. As described in the previous section, the worst- case project noise environment for architectural design purposes is 78 dBA for units adjacent to I~280, Therefore, to achieve an interior Ldn of 45 dBA, a minimum noise reduction of at least 33 dB must be provided by the combined elements of the building shell, particularly those units near the freeway. The transmission loss of architectural building elements is designated by Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings for wall elements and by Impact Insulation Class (ITC) ratings for flo~r/ceiling assemblies, both of which are methods of estimating the inherent ability to attenuate noise transmission. Residences away from both traffic sources would have noise exposure Jevels much lower due to both distance and shielding effects. , . Standard wood and gypsum exterior wall constructions have STC ratings of approximately 40 dBA or more. Standard hollow-core doors and openable single pane windows are rated at about 22-28 STC. Typical dual-layer thermal pane windows are rated at 27-30.dB STC. Except f9r actual cracks and openings in.a structure, doors and windows are usually the weakest elements in the design and construction of a good sound-rated building, and usually reduce the overall protection provided by the more substantial wall structures. RECOMMENDATIONS . Following are recommendations for meeting the primary criteria for good residential noise insulation design by the North Stelling Road residences development: 1. WINDOWS. Windows in units adjacent to and with a view of 1-280 should have STC ratings of.at least 33 dB. Special acoustical windows, with larger air spaces between panes, or with a thin ' plastic laminate Iayer between glass layers, can be obtained with STC ratings of33-38 STe, which would meet the requirement. A window STC rating of29-30 would be acceptable for units located away from 1-280, for general noise protection and to reduce peak noise levels from motorcycles and trucks. High quality double-glazed thermal windows, with two 1/8" lights separated by a 3/8" to 3/4" air space, and good weather seals if openable,have ratings of27-30 STC. 2. P ARTY WALL ASSEMBLIES. For minimizing noise transmitted between attached residential units, the party wall assembly should have several inches of air space, fiberglass insulation and minimal structural connections, and generally resilient channel (RC) attached to one side of the party wall, in order to meet the 50 dBA STC requirement Acceptable types of party wall assemblies are described in References 6 and 7. In addition. any fire stops between units should not provide a strong structural connection. TIlat is, they should be of lightweight material, such as sheet metal or fiberglass that cannot conduct low- frequency sound and vibration between units. 3. EXTERIOR DOORS. Entrance doors and sliding glass doors, particularly those in residences near and facing the freeway and North Stelling Road, should meet an STC rating of at least 25-27 dB to match the building shell noise reduction criteria. Environmental Consulting Services * . . Saratoga 13-112 Las Palmas Residential Noise Study - North Stelling Road, Cupertino Page 5 of6 4. OUTDOOR ACTIVITY AREAS. The residential building~ on the perimeter of the site near the two traffic noise sources will provide significant noise protection to interior yards, balconies and patios behind the buildings. Therefore noise levels in much of the interior of the site will be in the 55-60 dBA range, meeting general City planning targets for the residential environment 5. VENTILATION. Mitigation of outside traffic noise is based upon windows that are closed in oni.er to provide the required noise protection, Therefore all units, particularly.those units nearest the traffic noise sources producing the primary noise, must have a ventilation system that provides a babitable interior environment with the windows closed, regardless of outside temperature, In addition, if air conditioning units are installed, the noise levels produced by the AC units must not themselves cause a noise problem for any of the residential U11its associated with the project or adjacent residential properties. 6. GENERAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES. Good noise design must be implemented by good field construction practices or the design perfo1111a1lce will not be achieved. This includes minimizing all penetrations of ~d connections between party wall and floor/ceiling assemblies, and acoustical sealant around any necessary penetrations. If I may be of further assistance on this project, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully submitted, .~~ H. Stanton Shelly Acoustical Consultant Board Certified Member (1982) Institute of Noise Control Engineering Environmental Consulting Services * * * Saratoga 13-113 Las Palmas Residential Noise Study - North Stelling Road, Cupertino Page 60f6 REFERENCES 1. "Noise Pollution", Cupertino General Plan, Cupertino Planning Department, 1993. 2. ''Noise Insulation Standards," Section 3501, Title 24, Part 2, California Building Standards Code, revised September 1989. 3. Preliminary Design Submittal drawing set, Las Palmas, 10855 North Stelling Road; Dahlin Group Architecture; Pleasanton, CA; January 25, 2006. 4. Traffic volume counts: 1-280 freeway (year 2004) - Caltrans; North Stelling Road (year 2002, near Stevens Creek Blvd) - City of Cupertino Traffic Engineering, March 2007. 5. Highway Noise - A Design Guide for Highway Engineers, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 117, Highway Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1971 (model enhanced and field validated by ECS). 6.. DuPree, Russell B., Catalog ofSTC and lIe Ratings for Wall and Floor/Ceiling Assemblies, California Dept. of Health Services, Office of Noise Control, Berkeley, CA, Feb. 1980. 7. <<Fire Resistance and Sound Control Design Manual", 17111 Ed., Gypsum Association, Washington, DC, 2003. 8. "Noise Insulation Problems in Buildings", Paul V eneklasen & Associates, for Santa Clara County Airport Land Use Commission, San Jose, January 1973. Environmental Consulting Servicesh * * * Saratoga 13-114 UNIT COUNT: 6. Unit 1 3,Bedroo:n attached + 1300 SF 4. Unit 2 4 Bedroom attached + 1600 SF 10. Unit 3 4 Bedroom detached + 1800 SF 20 ' TOTAL UNITS DENSITY: NET: 18.13U/AC GROSS: 16.1 UI AC bUILDING ARE,\. 14,-.2.5 OJ Sl;,; fl BUiLDING COVERAGE: 30.9.'7' LANDSCAPE AREA 17,798 SO FT LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE: 37% HARDSCAPE AREA: 15,395 SO FT HARDSCAPE COVERAGE: 32.1% PARKING AREA: 2,005 SO FT 4.2% PAVING AREA: 13,390 SO FT 27.9% SITE ZONING 20-35 UIAC SITE AREA NET: 48,044 SF = 1.1 03 AC GROSS: 54,104 SF = 1.242 AC PARKING STALLS PROVIDED ON SITE GUEST PARKING PROVIDED: 13 inc 1 H' OFF SITE GUEST PARKING PROVIDED: 2 STANDARD COVERED PARKING: 40 TOTAL PARKING: 56 PARKING REQUIRED: 20X2.8 56 o NORTH SINGLE FAMILY & TOWN HOUSE VICINITY MM' SCALE: NONE Mf;otl0.2oo7 PROJECT NO: 305.001 LAS PALMAS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ~-.:~ !~---.:J LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. 5865 0..,. on.., 1'Ie....mon.CA'~588 :S~~;: ~II Ax,x !/:ETANINGW.....l FREE WAY ! I ____.u_______ I: ,: I I: , I 280 i I i I i i i i j UNIT COUNT: 6. Unit 1 3,Bedroom atlached + 1300 SF 4. Unit 2 4 Bedroom attached + 1600 SF 10, Unit3 4 Bedroom detached +1800SF 20. TOTAL UNITS DENSITY: NET: 18.13 U/ AC GROSS: 16 1 U/ AC BUilDING AREA 14,851 SOn BUilDING COVERAGE: 30.9 % LANDSCAPE AREA: 17,798 SO FT LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE: 37% HARDSCAPE AREA: 15,395 so FT HARDSCAPE COVERAGE: 32,1% z (J) -l m r r Z G) :::0 o )>, o PARKING AREA: 2,005 SQ FT 4,2% PAVING AREA: 13,390 SQ FT 27.9% SITE ZONING 20,35 U/AC SITE AREA NET: 48,044 SF = 1.103 AC GROSS: 54,104 SF = 1.242 AC PARKING STALLS PROVIDED ON SITE GUEST PARKING PROVIDED: 13 inc 1 H OFF SITE GUEST PARKING PROVIDED: 2 STANDARD COVERED PARKING: 40 TOTAL PARKING: 56 PARKING REQUIRED: 20X2.8 56 @ NORm SINGLE FMlllY & TOWN HOUSE SITE PlAN ' GARAGE lEVEL SCALE: 1/16' = ",0' Moy 10, 2007 PROJECT NO, 305.001 LAS PALMAS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 5865o-n.on..e ~CA945B8 :~~~:~~ ~II Al.l LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. PRELIMINARY DESIGN SUBMITTAL LAS P ALMAS ! 0855 1"-1. STELlH\jG RD. FOR LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. SINGLE FAMILY AND TOWNHOUSE LOCATION MAP BUILDING D VIEW FROM NORTH STELLlr~G BUILDING C LAS P ALMAS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. CONSULTANTS DEVELOPER: LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. 20120 ORCHARD MEADOW DRM Sil.RATOGA, CA 95070 408.872.1299 CIVIL ENGINEER, JMH WEISS, INC. 150 ALMADEN BLVD., SUITE 700 SANJOSE,CA9S113 .08.2864555 A,CHlk=L LJAHLlN ()ROU~ 5865 DWENS CRIVE PLEASANTON,:A 945B2 925.251.720;1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT' SSA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 303 POTRERO STREET, SUI'f: 40-C SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060 831.459.0455 TABLE OF CONTENTS T1.0 TITLE SHEET CIVIL C1.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C2.0 STORM WATER CONTROL PLAN ARCHITECTURE A 1.1 SITE PLAN A 1.2 BLDG. PLANS, BLDG. TYPE "A' - BLDG. 1 A 1.3 BLDG. PLANS, BLDG. TYPE "B' - BLDG. 2 A 1.4 BLDG. PLANS, BLDG. TYPE "C" - BLDG. 3 A 1.5 UNIT FLOOR PLANS - UNIT 1 & 2 A1.6 UNIT FLOOR PLANS - UNIT 3 & 3A AU ELEVATIONS, BLDG. TYPE "A", BLDG. 1 Al.B ELEVATIONS - BLDG. TYPE "B', BLDG. 2 A1.9 ELEVATIONS. BLDG. TYPE "C' - BLDG. 3 AU 0 ELEVATIONS - BLDG. TYPE '0" - BLDG. 4 & S A 1.11 ELEVATIONS. BLDG. TYPE "0" ,BLDG 6 & 7 A 1.12 ELEVATIONS, BLDG. TYPE "0" - BLDG. 8 & 9 A 1.13 STREETSCAPE - BLDG. TYPE 'D" . BLDG. 10.13 A 1.14 SIDE ELEVATIONS - BLDG. TYPE "0' - BLDG. 10-13 Al.1S SECTIONS lANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE L 1.1 CONCEPTUAL SITE AND TREE PLAN SINGLE FAMILY & TOWN HOUSE TITLE SHEET ~IO,2007 PROJECT NO: 305.001 I~ AtCKItICT1IIE 'lA.KNltI. ~=~"~;5BB T1.0 :~~~~~:~ F.r.1I 1:\3l5\lXl'l~PIOl\SD\mu5HEE1.dorQ,5/l5riOOill;stt.sAM.l:2.flwt: ~I ' II II . e ij ~ , ~ e. .' " ~~ , I: 'I I: ~I -= ~ ~Il ~ ~ _~ I ~ ~ t~ I: ~ ~~II ~ (j ~~II E; : I :! 1.\P'$lllIIf ~I : 'I I: 'I 1/1 i 'I~ I ,.~ JUNIPERO SERRA FREEWAY (INTERSTATE 280) LAS P ALMAS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA RJ.SIS OF" 9FARtNGS ~~N~rlIl'5D.f.rF~WOfIUI:rTlafl//mJNiRlMl'. BENCHUARK ~mAV:lnllE~rTI/lIIf//IJ:1II1.N;~~ ~-' I o 10' 20' I/O' 1""""- , ~l-.lI1' SINGLE FAMILY & TOWN HOUSE SCALE: l' = 20',0" GRADING AND DRAINAGE PlAN MAY 1 D, 2007 JMl'1WEISSJOB'458J LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Cl.O ""'-.,.----......---....- ,."....-."..... _........._."...,.."""__,._1'_ JMH WEISS, JrNC. c;,,~ Enl;/me<.ng - S\Jrve,;"9 - Lo/>d Plannmg 15D Almll~e~ Bou~r~, Suile 700 Son Jcose. Co 95113 (408) 2S&-4~55 JOBI45B:5 r=~ , JUNIPERO SERRA FREEWAY (INTERSTATE 280) LAS PALMAS I' ,I /: ,I II Ii ---I " II II " , en I: -; ~ Z " 'I '" I: Ii " I: 'I I: 'I II 'I II [I ,I I: I BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) STORMWATER TREATMENT MEASURE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE STATEMENT rrliSfffUW4l;ffifS 10 K[[J> 1II4CKfTNlWfrflW/CfNlfJIIISPEr:T1OI/SCHEIJIJIIFOR SlOO[Sj'mt:41l1fNfFfAJURfSDN'fHfS/f[. AMOIflHI..rl6~/NSPf.r:TIONfS /lECOJIJIfJI{Jf]) TO ENSIHlfNOOVi RJJK:rYJNTNCf)fSJl'A([(Lf.. NOPOOlJNJ;, OR BlOCK4C{). J)[fN/.B)JlfSf'fCIIONSSI>IllElfrnNWCT[1}/lTIIASfiW/C{M/ll'l.<<l.LTWTTH lI6PEClIOHSor:r:uFiRlNC(J)IJ1HflNDDfTHfI!ITS[)SllNTO SDElJ/JI.fSCMMfR 1iA/NlfN.IH:f.(2)8fRIR[Ml.J(}ftFAllRtlNtJfFINPREPARA7KlNFDRtIINlfP.NdJ(J) AlT[RPE/iK){)SorHfMRIJMJFF. IfAJN'lf}{.WCfJCTMrlfSTOJM:J.lJDEENStJRII(;7/ff: 5IWE6Wf'flPf'ERftI1RKRIGDIiWR $lICI{,4SKfIPfN(;mE.5lI'AU'SCI.IAI?OFDfBR/S, S.U:SEDIiIlNT.AND IfiUAOONNlO/JN{)fLlJlllCONmOl IDm"roPREYfJffCL~ IfrXJT1N[JIIlINJfN.4NCfALSIJ/NC.7..lIJlS~AHW..1Hr~1MCOI{X.f}fAfJ nJRfOliIJTHfJl/JNHEAl7HrIof'GrnlM"ARDSKlNfEDWBfRfR.4CalAf1U(BfIN'J ~A71KJROIJCH!JTOl{JItIfl'f(JrM4HftNAJlCff'WIIlUBfOCVf1OPE1JfflI(JI1TQ SflfCOMPl.lJ/ONANDII7U8E!.WJ[AloMAI1llroCffYJNSPIT:roRSlJPONRfOlJITf.. STORMWATER TREATMENT 115 PROJECT /SA TYPICA! FiESJfJfNTW. snr MTH U8JJUItI omsrrr RfOIJJRW f!( THE crrr CfNEJUlI'/AN. APPROX1OJ:fF11ESf1flS!'REDffl.TaTHfRPAVElJrJir(;'(:J\fRfZlMTli AfJ//lBI1&FlXJfPRNr.1HfvsrorSlJRFACCSTMI/Ir4lDi'7REA1IIfNlSSVCH.ts;BI1J NUTUIJI1EPmSlOSllMPSItNOFLrN-7HRDUGHNiEASIlU8EUSf])M/ENOERPRAI;1ICAL INADfJf1JON, 1IIE/JUll.IJINCSOOE5NW/IiII'ffX)WHSP(JUf"iDlHEC1J.rCONNfr:TflJ 10TH[ 51r1fJ/DR'AIN m7afAHD lI!1 fEtxRfCTfD INTO THE LNdl5C4Pf"AllE6 TO IHfOJ&{T fflIIC11CIlTOJW.JJ/fl[TH[OPPOImJNI1'(FrJR'MRUIlJFFiOBlafN{[p~AeSrJR8[f) /rIro lH[{;IlOIJN[JlJUDil[H fNTfRS 1H[COl1E:rIIJJ/smDl. THfalSTJNGSJ1ffSfI>PRDX1MttTEDMIMPfJ?IIII)lJSANDISIJSfDASARfS/DfNCf. THf PROPrEElJ/i!S1OENllJll.PROJfCTlWlNCf/U;frHEfIIPE1MlI5Sl1RFACESIllB5XW11II --- LEGEND r...<...Pd""....M ~~~~; 8f()-stNI' (D.26AOifS) c=J CDS IJNIr(O.nACRfS) c=J !i11/fflRUNOfT{o.OlACRlS) TOTAL SIT[ AREoI ' U 0 ACRES j r--t..:" SOIlL" ,".2I1' CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA r'~OT FOR COi\j-STRUCTIOi\J BIQ-SUMP CAPACITY CALCULA 1lON' 25 YEAR STORM EVENT iC"'_;:~ 111/'111_ ~O_iJ. UOxO.t5 ~O_JI cr.s SfOfi'AGEliIXlIMfr.AlClfiAnaN AIlrn4Ci A5l ..23 IT X 12 FT "S05n' ~12 /IJ. =5IJ5CF AI'iR4C[/fEJ~ -""" WACfff ""REOlI6iEJ)/D FII.1S{JW'PJ[ =Uliin (fCT[; AU B/OSJ1MPS FOR WSPRaJfCTHilIt"A IIHI1MVM DEPlHOF 12 IN. AT THf INI.Ef. 1HC 1Q-lC4R [J[51(;t>( m;;?U 5HWUJ Sf IJ!iB) ro IJErrfflElJIOO<<) OHOTHERA"f'!K:A8t(CII1TfI/oI, IIffENf.VV?IfI(;ff-flDW iIfP1S5lSARCNOTPRf1{U)E{}J BIQ-SlM' RESIDENCE TIME CALCULATIONS _=va"" .'MII. DRAIN INUf SIDE CRENlHC(5) PRCNW) ." OOaJWfARlA(Al! Gr/1EoPlNlNGRfOOlRflJI1JR1=7MlN. r"(A2){Zb/J5DIJ(AI$dI'g) Ifif7i'[ AZ ..SIIRFACEMDtOFlJIO-SWP(ri') h -HE'ADDFlIIIIDi'ADf TH[(lP[NIN!; (O.CSFf.) 7 _1Aff fFCfJNCfN1NA7lON (fW51HR.) Cd =CDUFICIOI7OF!;ONtP.AC71ON(D.S} g~1DI'orGRAvrrrrJZ.1FT/S') SURfN:CMlfArTfJtJSlJJ/I' AI ~FTIZlFT _FI' .4/.: (At) ,12/1/ J6(J(J(T){C:rJ I'g} -(506 FtXf (2dJ.rJS)) I J6W(aJ167}{&.h'Jil) ~111 rrz rt{f)RffXI1{fDUIAMDf11 ClFOI"fNINI::') (6) roI1 AI ><O.f12ff: .1,1/12 -a.009JFT' A -ZIfR' R =,.'(.1,/::) -'J.'''' 1.2rJ It. DlAJlDfR 1HillfFJRE. lISf (12) 1.20 III tmIaER 11m> HOU3, J ON [:401 SID[. ". " SINGLE FAMILY & TOWN HOUSE SCALE, l' = 20'.0" STORM WATER CONTROL PlAN MAY 10,2007 JMH WEISS JOBt 45B3 LOS GA TOS TRADE LINE CORP. ....-=,---~~-_........._I-_-""'""" ......,._~_ '""'_"-"'''''~''I..o;__''_J'fM;' JMH WEISS,IN!C. Civ~ Engineerir>g - SvrY1!y;ng ~ LClIc' f'lg....,mg ISO Almo,hm BDuhword, Su,1e 700 San Jt>&e. Co 95113 {408) ZB5-4~55 JOBl4S83 C2.0 ~ (II. ~ -fil ' i=-.~ ~~~~h J 1\ . ~I~ -ld \ ",----/" ,i ~\ ~ ':l '~~,: :"'"' ~~ """f rlI OJ nJ [D ,!\(~ [!J L_ '\ Fl f:l-"- ~" r>- R' .~,' ~,'r I[!J ft= (lj Urtjl~ UNlT:i r ...--- ~ ~ rn :~2 ~ '[l] \ \'~:td / . \I /-f, (\'\.... \, \'-'::::r 'j .., .-- B~'j,1 ' I!Jd . i; <~ "J M I (~ f~::::: I ~ I . _\ ~ f:/.... IJi- .~ ".V------1 :l r"" -;,----.. 'r,,~ I \l&{C"""-,,,,~ ~\~~12 WHTmL( ~~! I ------- Ib!I , I =-----./ ~ I'}'" l...iI Bl.DO. rm: 'D' I------. ~ MD.", I '\ "." \0 I ~I~ ~AlNINGW!\L1____ -J' rC/!"l1OtW.OfUIeO-I~G^TE RET,',NNGWAU. ,.\ .... '.' ". , ~ UNlT2 : 1IlI' ...:^~~ ,;~. L-r" ~ '--i h (') ~ I , 'P,,,-! <: .~- ~'if~ I ~ G~ - - f\ - r--;'\ <,~~ ~ OO~" ~u " ij l ~ '" .""'''''~ M n =r ooo""~ .~. ~~ .,~:: ~ ~ 'f --::::H I ~ NEWSDUND I'MllJ FREE WAY 280 LAS PALMAS LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP, i : I I I ~J' ~. .... '"'. .' ~ ..,.J..~ / / ~i1\ 1..7 I :. ~ Ll.,. -------- / ?i;-} ,ice -, . ,~~L-< ~. 10Nrr' i\\ \ I[]] r; \ ~', · rr -\ I \'g' J0Nrr1 . ',~ .-J i[ID ~ \ I ':'---i I If;i '-\J.~ I ,~Hf": \5- ~ """ \~ It h I1II II ~J r "'-0'{... I I /j k; Nil/hi ~. .....-s::__ '-.j< '&i.:l f1"iMII! 'llIUU' ~ ''''"hi "" ul-+rt-., , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Ii j! j! i! i I j! i i ._--~ i 1 i i i i I j UNIT COUNT; 6. Unit 1 3.Bedroom attached +'300 SF 4. Unit 2 4 Bedroom ottoched + 1600 SF 10. Unit 3 4 Bedroom detoched + 1800 SF 20. TOTAL UNITS DENSI1Y; NET: 18.13 U/ AC GROSS: 16 1 U/ AC BUILDING AREA; 14,851 SQ Ff BUILDING COVERAGE; 30.9 % LANDSCAPE AREA: 17,79B SQ Ff LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE: 37% HARDSCAPEAREA: 15.395 SQ Ff HARDSCAPE COVERAGE; 32.1 % z (J) -I m r r Z G) ::0 o )> o PARKING AREA: 2,005 SQ Ff 4.2% PAYING AREA: 13,390 SQ Ff 27.9% SITE ZONING 20-35 U/AC SITE AREA NET: 48,044 SF = 1.103 AC GROSS: 54,104 SF = 1.242 AC PARKING STALLS PROVIDED ON SITE GUEST PARKING PROVIDED; 13 inc 1 HI OFF SrrE GUEST PARKING PROVIDED: 2 STANDARD COVERED PARKING: 40 TOTAL PARKING; 56 -----aibG.lYPf.c 't:':"'"'" I~' r' T /\ '=:' WI ) ~...J ' "IT" ~~ 'I Il> "I I!Q ,LJ1L: I __~___________n.______.n__.__ ! ! i i PARKING REQUIRED: 20X2.8 56 @ NORlH SINGLE FAMILY & TOWN HOUSE SITE PlAN, GARAGE LEVEL SCALE; 1/16' = 1 ',0' MDt' 0, 2007 I'RDJEClND,305.oo1 CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ALl SFs6So..-on... Pl_.CA94588 :~~~~~~: Fa II .l:1,:lCS\D01~l-SP_""'II.Sll..5{.!OO111Sl".3llPJo\,UFr.lrt; -' LLI > LLI -' "" LLI n.. n.. ::J ~~f~~~ 1(.] r---, ~]1 L__--.l Lr_JJj [-!=_~~r~ ;c W ~ " q Z Z' 90~~ =:'z 00 \@ ~ 9 ~;::- ~59Lii ., Bco~~ :r: u"l Z 30 o , f-- ~ -' "" ~ o -' ~ g f .. I- Z ~ <I"l ~ N ~ ~. <( ~ ..~ ! ~ . ~ ~ ill' lllllC ~ I <( Z a:::: o u... --I <( U ... o z ~ LLJ a.. ::::> U a.. 0<:: 0 U w Z .....l W 0 (/) ~ ~ l- I./) --I 0 <( ~ a.. 0 (/) I./) ::s 0 .....l U PPE R LEVEL LOWER LEVEL 1 1 1 ,..-------------, i j TOWN HOUSE, BUILDING TYPE '8' BUILDING 2 BUILDING PLANS SCALE: liB' = 1 '.0' BASEMENT J.Iiat 10, 2007 PROJECT NO: 305.001 LAS P ALMAS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. SWDw....Orlno 1'I"""""....C...94S85 ~~~~:~~ F~ II J:\JCS\CGl~O\Clr!IwlrlQS\PbI\5O\FI'_a..DIU..~S/~7mqg:S4Ml,1.:2."nnI: Al.3 UPPER LEVEL 1--'--- c.3~_T_S i"..r: it-i 1,1- ! , , ~-~ LOWER LEVEL J ~ LAS PALMAS BASEMENT CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. ", 9 TOWN HOUSE" BUILDING TYPE 'C BUILDING 3 BUILDING PLANS SCALE: l/B" = "-0' May 10, '1007 PROJECT NO, 305.001 ~~CA~588 A 1 .4 :~~~~~:~~ Pm II J:\3llS\OO~~\f'lClI'.SW'P_BI.lXi_t.dwo.S/l5Izm711:49:trAM,1;Z.f'rar* i!'.,."""",,-~$~ 1 v.!': \8'-9' f~ l g~3/Jr' 11. l7-cr" i!''''''''''"~-"~!I<<, l~ a'-fI" ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ UNIT 1 ' UPPER LEVEL UNIT 1 - LOWER LEVEL ...zr-YfOTAltJlollTlMtn\iWlA1r.srAtE... ll1Z'1 Zf-Q" "1V2" ~ ~ } 11'-6' 'l!.{1' ~ J;J UNIT 2 - UPPER LEVEL UNIT 2 - LOWER LEVEL LAS P ALMAS LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ~n"""_~~~ r_~v.:" lfJ:'.go . ..i.t~.gVZ' ~- N ~ 17~ b 11 J UNIT 1 ' BASEMENT LEVEL vzr.",lOfAl.tNlTIIlDTHWI!#.SfN:E.... l11Z"1 ZHT ..!~ } I ..,. l~=J =^ UNIT 2 - BASEMENT LEVEL UNIT \: TOTAL= 1391 SF .432 Sf GARAGE 217 SF STORAGl:: UNIT 2: TOTAL.. 1664 SF ADO SF GARAGE SINGLE FAMILY & TOWN HOUSE UNIT 1 & 2 FLOOR PlANS SCALE: 1/8 = 1'-0' Mat10,2007 P'ROJECTNO: 305.001 5a6S 0-... l:lrM P1_nton,CA94588 ~~~~~:~: Fmll J:\JD5\OOl---c.up,Mo',Dn'WInos\f'lClt'\SD'Jtll-u11fT.f'\NtClo"llo5115(1OO711:4B:SII""",1:.2,Fnri: A1.5 " '0"'" 1 ff :; 1'1 lH=' lo } I ,-, } 15'-+7/8" :24'<," UNIT 3 - UPPER LEVEL BUILDING TYPE "D" UNIT 3 . LOWER LEVEL BUILDING TYPE "D" UNIT 3 - BASEMENT LEVEL BUILDING TYPE "D" 1 :f H' ~~ 16'-; l' 1 " ~ ~ ,.q L ,-r } Z4-o" ... } 14'-11l12" l 9'-o1lZ" ~ 24'-0"'1 } 1il'"",111r' ,.." UNIT 3A ' UPPER LEVEL BUILDING TYPE "D" UNIT 3A - LOWER LEVEL BUILDING TYPE "D" UNIT 3A - BASEMENT LEVEL BUILDING TYPE "D" BUILDING 4 THRU_ 13 BUILDING 4 THRU_ 13 BUILDING 4 THRU_ 13 LAS P ALMAS LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA UNIT3: TOTAL'" B49SF 420 SF GAP.AGE SINGLE FAMILY & TOWN HOUSE UN rr 3 & 3A FLOOR PLANS SCALE, liB = 1'-0' MoylO,2DD7 PROJECT NO: 305.001 SB650w.n0on.. P1_",,,,,,CAP-458B :;;;~~:~: F",IJ A1.6 J:'I3D5'OOl~-\..ffiT-Pl.AN.dvog..5/J5{1JXflll:4B:S7AM,1:2,l'i"a"l< LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION ""'~ """" ow. -"'" ""''''' ""'''''"'' ~''''' UNIT' COLOR SOiEME , ROOF 1 UN" 1 COlot SCHEME 5 ROOF' UNIT 2 COLOR SCHEME 2 ROOF 1 RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION LAS PALMAS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. TOWN HOUSE - BUILDING TYPE "A' BUILDING 1 ElEVATIONS SCALE: liS" = 1',0' May 1 D, 2007 Pl':OJECT NO: 305.001 ~~~5a8 Al.7 ~~~~~:;: ""II ):\lOS\OOl~D~IELEV_8l.DG_~511spm7ll:48:32.<U'1,l2,fr'"*- ~ UNfT2 COLOR SCHEME-4 RDOF2 LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION UNIT' COLOR SCHEME 5 ROOf' REAR ELEVATION UNfT2 COLOR SCHEME-4 ROOF 2 UNIT 1 COLOR SCHEME 3 ROOf 1 LAS P ALMAS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. TOWN HOUSE - BUILDING TYPE 'B' BUILDING 2 ELEVATIONS SCALE: liB' = , '-0' IIcflD,2007 PROJECT NO: 305.001 ~~~~;;588 A 1 .8 :;~;~~:~: Far II J:\105\ID1~~ot\SD'\ELEV_Bl.tXi_ll"",S/15,'2007U;4/l;2'lAI'\,"2.flri LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION LAS P ALMAS LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. FRONT ELEVATION UNlTl COLOR: SCHfME .4 ROOf' UNrr, COlORSOiEME 5 ROOf' UNIT 1 COLOR SCHEME 2 ROOF' UNIT' COlOR. SOiEME 1 ROOf' REAR ELEVATION CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA TOWN HOUSE. BUILDING lYPE 'C' BUILDING 3 ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0' fM)'lO, 2007 P'RDJECT NO: 305.001 ~:S~:~ ~~;S88 A 1 .9 :;;:~~~:~: Fe. JI :l:\3ll5\ODl...(:upertr\O\Drawfr'cs'\A0t\5D\ElB'JIUXU:.~ snSJm7 U:4!:l.5 A"1. .:2, Front; i'I~ERCEMENT '""'" LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION UNIT' COLOR SCJ-1EME4 ROOf 2 UNIT 1 COlOR SCHEME 3 ROOF 2 RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION LAS P ALMAS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. TOWN HOUSE, BUILDING TYPE "D' BUILDING 4 & 5 ElEVATIONS SCALE, 1/8' = 1',0' M~10,2D07 Pli:OJECT NO; 305.DO 1 AIC.ITfC'''11 rlAIUUN' ~':~~C~:5B8 A 1 a 1 0 :~~~~;:~~ f~ II J;\lD5\OOl.~V'\Ol\5D\EI.EV_BLDG_D_~-5.d"'Il,S/l512ro711;4B;lIIAM,.1;2,.1'<<In< ""'''''' ~ rll~~ro.e.rr 51~NGLE LEFT ELEVATION UNrr3 COLOR SCHEME 2 ROOf' BURDlNG7 FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION TOWN HOUSE, BUILDING TYPE "D' BUILDING 6 & 7 ELEV A TI ONS SCALE: 1/8" = 1',0' Met( 10,2007 PROJKT NO, 305.001 LAS PALMAS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. ;':::':;:c~~;", A 1 . 11 :~;:~~:~: Fm II ':\305'tOOl~~\~_IlI.DG_D_Hl.dw(j,~711:~7:S!lAM,1:.2,frri. LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION TOWN HOUSE - BUILDING TYPE 'E' BUILDING B & 9 ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/8" = 1 ',0' RIGHT ELEVATION Mar 10, 2007 PROJECT NO: 305.001 LAS P ALMAS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA AtCBITEl:TURE HAlININ. LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. ~~~~58' A 1.12 :~~~~:;: f",1I J:\305\OOl~_Bt.CG_D_H.dw;l,SilSnrXl711:'I7:52A11i,l:2.,Fnrlk FRONT ELEVATION LAS PALMAS LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. UNlT3 COLOR SCHEME 1 ROOF' BUILDING 12 UNIT 3 COlOR. SCHEME.4 ROOF' IIUILDlNGll CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SINGLE FAMILY BUILDING 10 THRU. 13 (LOT 1 THRLJ. 6) STREETSCAPE SCALE: 1/8' = 1 '-0' Mayl0,20D7 PROJECT NO, 305.001 .. AIC..UCT... 'UNNI"_ ~~~~~58B A 1 .13 :~~:~~~:~~ F,.II J:\3D5'PD1~_rll!IG_D_1D-U.dwg,Sf15[l'JIJ7U,O'2!1AM,I'2,frw* r ""'"'""" SHINGlE =~fm. ;'lEE~ CEME~'T ~P5IDING 'II!8'E;:'i"?5UP.;5 UNrT3 COLOR SCHEME 3 ROOF 2 UNrT3 COLOR. SCHEME.4 roOF 1 BUILDING 13 BUJLDt-.lG l' LEFT ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION UNITJ COLOR SCHEME 1 ROOFI UNITJ COLOR SCHEME 2 ROOF 2 ~UILDING12 tIUILD1NG10 RIGHT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION LAS PALMAS CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. SINGLE FAMILY BUILDING 10 THRU. 13 [LOT' THRU. 6} SIDE ELEVATIONS SCALE: liB" = 1 '-0' J.JcrlO,2007 PROJECT NO: 305.001 58650...".0,;..." P1.."".,I......C'O'94588 :~~:~~::~~ F~ II J:\3CS\OOl~l.EV_Bl..DCiJl.JD--~Sf]Sf1W111:47:2)AM,1:2,FIiInk A1.14 1".o")FEST~~:.-__ _ _ I'ASEO ~ =~:":----:--1Il saaMl.1-[$UI...Et~ _"_ ___ _ o SECTION THROUGH UNIT 2 LAS P ALMAS LOS GATOS TRADE LINE CORP. .u ~:'~~~-- 5It'EtWX(5.Ul~~ @ SECTION THROUGH UNIT 1 CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA .u TOWN HOUSE SECTIONS SCALE: liS" = 1 '.0' Moy1D,:ZOO7 PROJECT NO: 305.001 ~::;:- CA";:'" A 1 . 1 5 :~~:~~:~~ Flail .l:\3IlS\lXI1..Q'l'l!rlll'lOlpr~r...:t\SD\SEr:T1ON5..doog,s.l1S/2OO? lbC:1S AM, 1.:.. frri .1 ~.CI.)ER;.~ '~TRAN':>P1...Alfl"E II I' DECOM'TM WOOD TRH.llS TOMlt.TCHI'lCXETPiH:1 YN5TOGIl.(NtOYBl. """' l' FREEWAY 280 !!I LAS PALMAS z en -I m r r Z G) ;;0 01 )>1 0. I TREE LEGEND ~ =DTANr-~I"--Ol"'1"1()N :2JZE. ~ ~ o ='<'tJ2.OTR"r"4 X COPPERTOkE' COPPERT:::>NE LOQUAT :;..'3.?X I'C~ o E:)(~TI'Nc, Q..ERCU5 S;:>P. I EXI:>TlN::;, OAK TRiOE EXE>TING: Qj LAGER&TRO:r1iA Il-DICA I CRAFE ~TLE 36"eOX ;"cAL o LO=.-t?ST?t?NCON::::RTJ5/BRI55!INE~ 3,S'eoX I'CAL ~ PI-I:A=;NIX C.iN-i"?EN&15 I CANARl I&LAND DAT!': PALH EXlS7lNG ~1< 0-0'''" C".'-' ''','' . '" c '"_"' ..1r;;:G.c:,"J"U"'1"':;:;-4N:::;:"'~ c;:~ ~Cl-lTc..AR?U:: FOi":TUNEI ' WINDHI...L PAL~ o lR5T~\,JI.?P55 ~INA I WATE~ GUt" 5TANDARCJ :~"3C:X . \~ . , ~jRF P.A. PLANTING ARE!J. VlNElESPAUEP. BOTANIC.IJJCOt1MON t.. ;Ole Pur ::-1c::U5 punl:..A ! CREPING ;::IG 6. SO~ J..i5 &OL.ANUM JASHINOCE5 / ~:::::T!J,TO vINE SHRUB PLANT LIST (PLANTS TO BE 5ELECTE:> ROM LEoT 9ft 'JOT LMr-ED -;-0) BOTANICAlJCOM/OION AlDE 51'RIATA I ~ ALOE Ac:.AVE A11ENJ4U I AG.!>.vE EUG:"IJA M'fRTlFoLIA vAREUATA I C:l.T.j,L1NA a-€R~ l-El"ERCCAU..5 ...rrBRD A..."TEC GOLD I ~ E~ D..l.'f L.a.:r Il..EX ,IOHITORJA ~4 I DUJARF ,. AlJPON KNf>I..ICR!l, WA~L!l. I RED j..lOT PCX..t:~ LANTANA 'C:OLD 1'<:1l5~' I N.A. Ll5LG~ J.4POND..JM TEXAl-UH I w...:o< ~ PRIvET ~l5E1U1 RlJ6RUH 'EATON CAN'rON' I ~;:aF i'OUNTA1N ~ ~tJ.J5 PRO&TRllTlJ& I Ro&Et1ARi SITE LEGEND mmot ~ "'''''- DECORATivE Son:: BLOCK RETAINNS. tlJAlL LOW RETAlNlNS ~ .ll'Tf-.J ~ ::IN TOF 5'DE TARO lI.OOD FENCE I.". 6-o'j P!.ITOI'ENC::: 1</- 42") 181 E5J ~ III: ~ D Pl.!.I&1ER ,,'-0' ~ (PRO,tDS;> 5T 0lJI'.lR) LA~ CLMBlNC'= 6OU~ NTEGRAL COLORED CONCR::IE P~5TIR..:l.N lLL1LK N7ERL.CCKING vHIIa.!L.!.R PAvEKS (TBDJ DECOMPOSED GR.!'.INITE Pt.vNG GENERAL NOTES: l AlL 5IRl".ACE& Wm.N Ar...cE556l..i: Pt.TJ..I OF TRAYEL 5I-<t.J..L c:;orr?L'f Wfl1..I ADA REQ..lREMENT5, z. ~ DE5~ TO I"EET TI-iE em- OF CLPERTIhO LR:-iN ~ P.:JLUJTbN PREvBlTlON ~ 3. L!lRGE ~ 115 ~ MNMJl1 WU 6E FLA\>I1ED llHTl..IN 5..1NlTART 5B.lER EASEMENT TO &e::REEN ~ WALL CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA LOS GATOS TRPDE LINE CORP. <.8'30"- ;"C~L )4'ECX ~ mr 5ga :;..4 5~1 \2 o NORTH SINGLE FAMILY & TOWN HOUSE SCAlE: 1116"= 1'-0' CONCEPTUAL SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN WAY ltI, 2007 PROJECT NO: 02005..29 31DP\>uarokSlll-+o.c s..c-.CA.J505ll.2?5li lJ.NDSCAPI :~: ~:m:~::::i~ .ABcHrr1IcTs ...,..". III I I . CD. n1COUOIA'I"IDC1LA ":ID5 ll.l r..- ! ~---::~- , -ir L f~ . ~ .; ~ ~ ~ -. i lOT17 f jA"".8OfIjSf 1;sf I L.- ~ ...L~--=-j I ,.- I LOT18 I~: j A./.42f:tg u~ ~ InTJI"" JIM /: :'_""~,::;:.,,=,,_-=-~=lIIU- ........._.... fM~ I ,I ~I : -,I cn.~~I~~ T /I",,","JOfS4l$";' "-"r LOT 3 '--0,-- ~7.1"'f.st] ~ll '116'6f1I'..1AV; I" ,.~~:~rt~ F ~;;;;, l ~'". .~~H~ ~ ----:;--~ S 8979"5"[ 1J7.Jr JUNIPERO SERRA FREEWAY (INTERSTATE 280) tM- I D R_A F r I LlIIlIABU CW?V[TA8/.[ ,., """" CilR~ DWA dll(;fH II 5m7)!:l'r ,.' 8VJSW' '0' " .. ,.' lB'f6JJO ". -., I.~ ' " '".. ~. " .. m' " ftJl"IH'rII-' II ,," I " - H's" " ~: !I~ HI .. , 1'1 '" 1_00" W '" ," """,.., I,otr '" '" 'flY '" - ,.. "' '" "' e'V'J[I~ I. i>> W ~ ..... r.IlO' ~ M!n'W" I' NW5!"1 ! (I /rJ' 2f)' 4f)' ~- , ~r..trt ""'""" In-:!IO-Ill Sl.ISIl'W. -- ..,. - ~ I SlAJt}MSDl(PLMIW' 1 mG\G1JC~Pl.W ,!e 'J;-YMP ----~ BASIS OF BEARINGS 1If:JEWC;'o~.(IJfI1ECDlIlRlNtOf1KlR1l1smJ.M;RCJl(}1!E/IrIDf1101D4H) JIO/OEN1SIlS~llSllf_rT~ ~ BN:StIISIlfWiPMII{;~OfI/JK/j/!iIEW/f;;~-~ ~r!' GENERAL NOTES: ~ I.DSQIJIl5'IIIUJH:~ ~~.IOO'I' ~~:;J:} J:$ m-Im C14tJa&RjJ.lHgS!Rlfl'lft" !:~::::swr7r;D $NIJOSl.~1!511J (dJMS-6S1(flW2llI---mJ!MtI ~/AIiIII<<' --"" .wlillDllIart145+I-N:RfS 1~IUIl'll/rJPfJf/1lR1~ RE3UMIl/.IfQ/_2lO'-JS1l.!<<' --"'"' ......--""'" "',."""'" I'ICIrWI:~fP';W) lDICll~tu:lXIHSUWlf;CIIJI.1t/lAl'{FIII(J._ '-'~lllmJJ'IlOO(~f71mlIr_lIMr._ l1II€B Il' tH1O>\S M6U <<DmI UlTSIF lIE" 1/lP-1fM FZJlOD"!liXrlPll'~~_~5UlJU:T1P JIltI-IfM/l,AXIIII!___Dl1'tH!;U!S1HWlN'rrJ FDIlII1II1f<<1IECDl\'IilIil:IIN~IoiEiIIS1m1lWr' :k-:CI1II_PIfJlEf:1F1J/lI'tI\m;1Dt1/E LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS """"'-~ PfIfJPfW'IlM(-AI:lIII:EM"!il1E f'FD'fJfTTfH~1D r:8f1f1UClICOIt.tJN:11f1J ~~ @ mMJ-.rENI LAS PALM AS TENTATIVE MAP SUBDIVISION PLAT MAP _ CI<Ui"ORMIo JMH WEISS, lINC. ,;~n~ 5;;;:~ ~ond "::f'J hI(_)lt6;:~~~~~_~ "'/D' ,,,.,.. 1 OF2 :,-=-":::;,,z:..~..::::.'=..~""'-- ....,....""'..... J~~ I I I" Ii! Ilr I' II I I I en I -< ~ , z " 'I! '" I:; ~ 1~/lII' 5/JJl// 1;1 Ilf I ~ '( If I ~ I z JUNrPERO SERRA FREEWAY (INTERSTATE 280) t r if If I' t~- I DRAP-r I " 0- .-~ 0-''''' 3hEETINDE>.. 15lJ'3!)M!Jf)//l'j.(JJ/A." l_N(}~P'..<II I3ASIS OF BEARINGS :=:'..:so=~r.;:~~I(II(THSlOWIt'Ill'I'.O~lli'JPJWJ ~ lIlWiSlXY'_'TIIC~Df"/IOIf//I;;[llIII;=4!{l~..4Il f1iYATI()j{~1R.fr' i o 10' 2fI 4f]' ,-_ I ......"" .. LAS PALMAS TENTATIVE MAP GRADING AND DRAINAGE Pl.PJ.l 'UPUmWO "'UFORW" ]MH WEISS, JINe. ,~.~=:~ ~",;.ry;:;g -;"';O'::'P:~7,J ToI(41XJ)ze6~~,~0ll)i'~5_.!;58 "jO.E """" 2 OF2 E IB cc. ( #t3 (j ({)7 (20-35 DU / Gr. Ac.) Quasi-Public / Institutional Commercial/Residential Medium / High Density + 1391 Sf 1- 1664 SF ~ 1849 SF + 1649 SF v 2. 20 NET: 18.13U/AC GROSS: 16.1 UI PI:. BUilDING AREA: 14.851 SQ Fl BUILDING CO\IERAGE: 30.9 % HARDSCAPE Al!fA: 19,40 I SQ FT HAR_~ ~~EL40.6 PAAKING AREA: 2,308 SQ Fl 4.8'lb PAVING MfA; 12,30() SQ Fl 25.6% ~:r!};Q.~IN(L 20.35 U/Ac; ~T!'~ PAA!CI~~IAll5!'llQ""PED ON SIT!: GUm fAAKING PROVIDED: 15 inc STANDARD COVEl!fO PARlCING: 40 TOTAl. PAWNG: 56 PARlCING REQUll!fO: 2OX2.8 56 @ NORTH , . . . . , , , , I i j . . : . . , . I i i i i- t,!. ...-tj , I' I I: , , ~j ! I,' ~ : I : i ji i j! 'I d . j' i .! : II Z i !i I : I:'" I : V,I : 1:-1 r' !i m .. 'i r- Ii r- I' - .1 Z , "^ i i! \II : I!;o ! i! 0 i !i)> : !! 0 ! j: : i J ~ i ~ : j I : f: i i I : i: : i i if: , .1 i ! 1 : !! , ~ ' +-- --- -t , , , ., : !: , " : J I : i: : I: : I ~ I ! 1.I00AC 1,242 AC 48.044 SF = 54.104 Sf .. NET; GROSS: Proposed Site Plan $'~ , , 2130 - - - .. ~ FREEWAY SiNGlE FAMilY & TOWN HOUSE SITE PlAN . GARAGE lE\IEl SCAlE: 1/16' = 1'.0" ~19.M) ! I z . en ---I m r r - Z G) ::0 o )> o I I i i i, i i , I I: . , I, -f-I I: i 1 i! i: j i j i , I I: i i i i i i , I I: i! , I I: i! j: . I I: i 1 , I I: i r , I I: i I , I 1 : : , I: , , I: i! j! . I I: i! i i i i , I I: i 1 , I I: --H , I i : . I I: i! , , I I , I : ~ - - - - FREE WAY 280 RET A1NINc; WAlL-. LlCiHTM'l [ i i! , I I: i ~ ~ ! [i [ ! i; -..-W , , I. i i .. j ! 1 1 i P '1 II i J jl , I !! Z ! I . I; C/J i! -I j: m . I , I: r- . j i r- '- Il Z j! G> Ij ;0 !i 0 ! ' i! )> ii c ' I j I , I I j , , r ~ i I ; i , I I. II i i i: , I 11 j l .---t-i [ i j i i: i! I! . . . , . , . . . . . : , . . . . . . , . . . . I -t . . : , . . i . I , I I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i . . . . , , , , . . . . . i , i I . . , , . , , , . . , . . . I , , , . . . . . . . i : : , 'r- . . . . . . . . . . . . , I Revised Site Plan ';t !J..t:!tR";:U~::1<.'"'rt Ii 11,,,..:,',.,,'..1::,,, T'C'i~ >1d'iE _...;:t,:: IMlix, ".J'!!'! I~0~~: :~>:j~j ~ p,.,""..".,,:,',.,",',..', ~?p$li+ )~~~ -:ill FREE WAY 280 UNITC()lJNT. 6. 1Jni! 1 3.Bedroom amxhed + 1391 4. Uni! 2 4 Bedroom clIcdled + 1664 8. Unil 3 .. Bedroom c1etoched . 1849 2. Unir 3 .. Bedroom <lttocl'Mld + 1849 20. TOTAl UNITS [)~NS,.rY NET: 18.13 UI AC GROSS: 16.1 UJAC BUILDING AREA: 14,851 SQ Fl BUILDING CO\IERAGE: 30.9 " ~~~~~7~.f.r lANOXAl'E OPEN SPACE: 28.7% HARDSCAPE AREA, 19,401 SQ Fl !w!QgAPE <;:OVERAGh.!(),!!!! PAAKlNG AREA: 2.308 SQ fT 4.8% PAVING AREA 12,30() SQ FT 25,6% ~1UQ.NING 2o.35..lJ/AC $ITI;,R~ NET: 46,044 SF = 1.100 At GROSS, 54,104 SF ,. 1.242 AC "-~I~..~:r:"lLS~OEl:l ON SITE GUEST PAAKlNG PROVIDED: 1 t STANOAID COVERED PAWNG: 4( TOTAl PAWNG; 5( Pi\Iij(ING REQUIRED, 2OX'1,8 5. @ NORm :'4 ,. SINGlE FAMilY & TOWN HOUSE SITE PlAN . GARAGE lE\IEl SCAlE: 1/16' = 1'-0" .lUN;f l/9.1OO1 NOKCT~ ,J}!dWI 280 z en -t m r- r- Z G) ;0 ~ o f J! I: If " I: j. ....../.-i jl il .' p ii ji ji i! ~ ! .f ,: I: ji j! ji i i ii !l ,I , : ii I' j' d , : i i j 1 . , II j! " : , . , I: i I i I j i i: .1 I, i i -H i! J: i i j! II WAY FREE NfL ~r",.!: " ;-#!~= CA-85 ~;: & tt~! i2::;:==~~-=c~ ,~dj9cent to 1-280 - il~("::';;::;~F~~.:::1 :;;;:4 ;~~)':I: -\ ~~~~.)' ;_,~_~x~ting R~s~4t?ntial -"/-~"'<./J;:-"'.:i;.- .-':~l"'I-;'P... ,..,>W'" '~f-' ..~....(. "~.,_.'._~ ~~, ~~..~~}"?, $' ~ /' -? f""__,, i-- \ ,) ~\-'i<~~~~:;~~~~~~\ \ ~.....- ~ >-:-'; _L_~' '" -:."'-~~_! A,~ 1 ~. -:- .. '> ~:";"- ~ '1'''-x '.-, .'1. / J;,.." . (<..; r ..,...... ~r, '....:.:f.i.:>...~:;-.>:.-. /' -":"'. ,.~.: ~L':? :,,-~!f. " ' ,<l"-""v",,, -;-:1. :-.. (. ~~ 'fl''' ""1'" ,..,; ~::,:'i!>:::1-<C?i:t.! r~ \\'-~'-:::/;;:,-'; ".':.o':,'t.: Yv>$S L.. I .. \, -~-t.' . '", " -. '. '. ". '-.'~" ,," T~." 3',;.:' ~, . . "" v' I ."~. . .'. ,.__4' j //:\.'-'~:'\.~~'f ~ I '. :'-~C'::"):-f'<":""{; - , ~'" ". ."""..,..""",.., -/::;.i ""tz;;''',,:'' 'I '" <-,,:-....:::,>".! .::~.;"'j (~~~ . r 1 .. ,,' ". (~:~!:t; . ! City of Cuperti Zoning City Boundary Agricultural Residential D DA1 ? I ; il '1 I, i: .1 II II i! I: II --l.J i ii '1 I: il i! il j! j! , , Ii Z I: ' I! (J) i! -I il m il r- '1 r- !, - ii Z Ii G) I: -n i! ,AI j: 0 " )> I! ii 0 i: i: 'I i! II , I I, i i ! ! ! ! I: i i ~ j 1 i i i i , ! . , . , . . . . , , '\ \ tJ-li.IIOC:i't"'~.G<'\"f ~I 11 I ,"",-,. - <- FREE WAY 280 lI:F-""~~u.