No preview available
CC 03-03-03 AGENDA CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL ~ REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ REGULAR MEETING 10300 Torre Avenue, City Hall Council Chamber Monday March 3, 2003 5:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROLL CALL PLANNING AND FINE ARTS COMMISSION INTERVIEWS - 5:00 p.m. - Conference Room A 1. Interview applicants for unscheduled vacancies on the Planning and Fine Arts Commissions. RECESS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - 6:45 p.m. in the Council Chambers CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS 2. Proclamation for JC Penney's for their part in the Children's Shopping Spree. 2a. Proclamation for Colorectal Cancer Awareness month. POSTPONEMENTS WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously. 3. Approve the minutes from the February 11 and 18 City Council meetings. March 3, 2003 Cupertino City Council & Page 2 Cupertino Redevelopment Agency Adopt a resolution accepting Accounts Payable for February 14 and 21, Resolution Nos. 03-040 and 03-041. 5. Adopt a resolution accepting Payroll for February 28, Resolution No. 03-042. Approve a fee waiver request in the approximate amount of $402.00 for the Homestead High School Music Boosters May 9, 2003, annual music awards banquet at the Quinlan Center. Approve a fee waiver request in the approximate amount of $628.00 for the Organization of Special Needs Families' March 23, 2003, first annual event recognizing the organization's achievements. Adopt a resolution accepting a Quitclaim deed for Chao-Yue Liu and Daphne W. Chen, Husband and Wife as Joint Tenants, 21831 San Fernando Avenue, APN 357-15-039, Resolution No. 03-043. Adopt a resolution accepting a Grant of easement, roadway, for Chao-Yue Liu and Daphne W. Chen, Husband and Wife as Joint Tenants, 21831 San Fernando Avenue, APN 357-15-039, Resolution No. 03-044. 10. Adopt a resolution accepting an Improvement agreement for Chao-Yue Liu and Daphne W. Chen, Husband and Wife as Joint Tenants, 21831 San Fernando Avenue, APN 357- 15-039, Resolution No. 03-045. 11. Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for, accept, and appropriate $600,000 in FY 2003-04 funding from the State Bicycle Transportation Account for the Mary Avenue Footbridge Improvement Project, Resolution No. 03-046. 12. Watershed Protection Collaborative: a) Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a reimbursement agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Water District in the amount of $90,000 for the District to fund the efforts of the Watershed Protection Collaborative, Resolution No. 03-047 b) Adopt a resolution authorizing the Director of Public Works to negotiate and execute an agreement in an amount not to exceed $90,000 for with CONCUR, Inc. for the administration of the Watershed Protection Collaborative, on condition of approval of the reimbursement agreement by the City and Santa Clara Valley Water District, Resolution No. 03-048 ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) March 3, 2003 Cupertino City Council & Page 3 Cupertino Redevelopment Agency PUBLIC HEARINGS 13. Hold a public hearing on the 2002~03 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Funds. 14. Consider Application Nos. GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01, and EA-2002-01, City of Cupertino, Citywide; an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan and any other elements affected by the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan, and an amendment to the Heart of the City Specific Plan to incorporate the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan. A Negative Declaration is recommended, and this item is recommended for approval. 15. Consider Application Nos. MCA-2002-03 and EA-2002-10, City of Cupertino, Citywide; a Municipal Code amendment to Chapter 19.28 and related chapters affecting single- family residential development in the R1 zoning district. A Negative Declaration is recommended, and this item is recommended for approval. Ordinance No. 1915: "An Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, Amending Chapters 19.28, 19.80, 19.100 and 14.18 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Regarding Single- Family Residential Development Regulations." PLANNING APPLICATIONS UNFINISHED BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS 16. Receive a report on Labor Compliance Provisions for Construction Contracts and approval of Revised Special Provisions for Certified Payrolls and Prevailing Wage Requirements for the Civic Center and Library Phase II Construction Project. 17. Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 1914: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 11.24.170 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to Parking Limitation on Certain Streets, Establishing a 30-Minute Limited Parking Zone on Bonny Drive, Scofield Drive, and Pepper Tree Lane, in the Vicinity of Faria School." 18. Discuss how hillside exceptions for residential development are reviewed and approved. 19. Review the proposed housing assistance program for Cupertino teachers. ORDINANCES 20. Conduct the second reading of Ordinance No. 1912: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 2.40 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Regarding the Disaster Council." March 3, 2003 Cupertino City Council & Page 4 Cupertino Reqtevelopment Agency 21. Conduct the second reading of Ordinance No. 1913: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Sections 2.88.010 of the City's Ordinance Code Modifying the Composition of the Audit Committee." STAFF REPORTS 22. Receive a report on the Water Resources Ordinance sponsored by the Santa Clara Valley Water District (no documentation in packet). COUNCIL REPORTS CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to Tuesday, March 4 from 5:00 - 8:00 p.m. in Conference Room C of City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, for a joint study session with the Planning Commission regarding the preliminary review of the proposed General Plan update. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Canceled for lack of business. Itt compliance with the Americans with Disabih'ties Act (ADA), the City of Cupertino will make reasonable efforts to accommodate persons with qualified disabilities. If you require special assistance, please contact the city clerk's office at 408-777-3223 at least 48 hours in advance oJ the meeting. CITY OF CUPEI TINO DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Special Meeting Monday, February 11, 2003 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 5:15 p.m. Mayor Chang called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor Michael Chang, Vice-Mayor Sandra James, and Council members Patrick Kwok, Dolly Sandoval and Richard Lowenthal. Council members absent: none. Planning Commission members present: Chairperson Angela Chen and Planning Commissioners Charles Corr, Taghi Saadati, and Gilbert Wong. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood (6:40 p.m.), City Attorney Charles Kilian, Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, City Planner Cynthia Wordell, Senior Planner Vera Gil, Associate Planner Peter Gilli, Public Works Director Ralph Qualls, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Robert Levy said that the General Plan should address a walkable community with tree-lined streets. In the past, trees have been planted in narrow parking strips, and they have broken the sidewalks as they grew. He suggested larger planting areas in the future. CONSENT CALENDAR Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Right of Entry Agreement between the City and Mr. Michael Gilley, 10440 Serra St., Resolution No. 03-020. Lowenthal/Kwok moved and seconded to approve the item on the Consent Calendar as recommended. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: None. STUDY SESSION February 11, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 2 Joint study session of City Council and Plamfing Commission to discuss the administrative draft of the General Plan. Staff gave a PowerPoint presentation summarizing the major changes to the General Plan, referred to the bound copy of the Administrative Draft of the Cupertino General Plan, and the staff report dated February 11, 2003, which included the Briefing Book. Community Development Director Steve Piasecki reviewed the results of past community surveys, town hall meeting and focus groups regarding walkability, traffic density, and building heights. He said the primary objective of this study session was to develop the parameters for the Draft Plan to frame subsequent public discussion. The main points of the discussion were Community Form, Housing Opportunities, Share the Road, and Sustainable Community. The change areas include the Heart of the City specific plan area (along Stevens Creek Boulevard), Vallco Park, and the area at north DeAnza and Homestead. Facilitators Carolyn Verheyen and Lou Hexter led the discussion, and Council gave the following direction: Community Form -More information is. needed for the Growth Parameters Chart, particularly to identify discretionary and nondiscretionary items, to identify the specific terms of development agreements, to compare with neighboring cities in meeting housing requirements, and to find out if mixed-use housing units can be used to satisfy ABAG housing requirements. Corporate headquarters - The plan should generally allocate growth to existing companies, especially those with sales offices. There should be flexibility to transfer some of the square footages to allow for new companies. Street frame and building heights - The street frame issue is not directly related to walkability. The emphasis should be on practical walkability, and a better rationale is needed for the street frame concept. Building heights greater than 3 stories will require further education and simulation. Building heights - Provide further description and rationale, especially for the Stevens Creek Boulevard and DeAnza area. Clarify that the concept of street framing is to bring new development to the street to support expansion of existing businesses. Some visuals are needed illustrate the concepts. Econo~nic development - Concentrate economic development at Vallco Park and City Center Crossroads. Mixed-use opportunities at Vallco are especially important. Continue to nurture existing neighborhood centers and provide a holistic view of the commercial area. February 11, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 3 External activities - The City has little influence over DeAnza College. Supporting the vitality and walkability in the community must be done in a quality way, and help the community to visualize this while understanding the impacts. Housing opportunities - The question was too simply stated about the need for a better jobs/housing balance. Appropriate housing is the issue, use the formulas as guidelines to test new development proposals. Promote diversity of housing types. Job growth should be somehow tied to housing. Consider impacts on community services infrastructure such as schools, parks, etc. Mixed use can help meet the goals of affordability and walkability with minimal impact on the infrastructure, but should be located with sensitivity to traffic impacts. Insure a variety of affordable housing types -usually smaller units are preferred. Increase density bonuses, and promote affordable housing for people working and studying in the community. Leslie Burnell, a Cupertino resident, said that Council should approach this from a practical, system-engineering standpoint, not an emotional one. For example, as long as Stevens Creek Boulevard is a main thoroughfare, it won't be walkable. E.J. Conens, a Cupertino resident, was not in favor of the plans for Stevens Creek Boulevard and Highway 9. There is too much building going on while many places are empty, and the quality of life is deteriorating. He asked if the City has asked ABAG for reconsideration regarding the required number of housing units, and said the citizens should be driving the General Plan, not the staff. Robert Levy, 10802 Wilkinson Avenue, said that there are a lot of special centers that are not fully addressed in the General Plan. He agreed that as long as Stevens Creek Boulevard is a thoroughfare it would not be walkable. Penny Whitaker, 202622 Cheryl Drive, said the Planning Commission voted to send the Crossroads Plan to the City Council, and this seems to be the last chance to discuss it. The General Plan is due to be adopted in 4 months, which is too short a time period to get the community involved. She said that the City had promised that the Seven Springs development would not affect the schools because the houses would be too expensive for young families, but that turned out not to be the case, and the community needs further input into the Crossroads Project. De,mis Whitaker, 202622 Cheryl Drive, said the Council's decision would affect the community over the long term. He urged them to plan out as far as they can see, including their goals for the Kaiser Permanente property. He said the community does not want high growth or high density. February 11, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 4 Shishir Mukherjee, 1174 Scotland Drive, said Cupertino could never have a downtown, like communities such as Palo Alto have, because their histories are different. He said there could be a better design at the Crossroads Center but the traffic pattern must change. He said there is a need for more beautiful community buildings, such as the Quinlan Community Center, as well as a theater, movies, and affordable housing. Jomme Tong, 2239 McClellan Road, referred to a neighborhood meeting held the previous evening, and said that no one liked the Crossroads Plan. They are not in favor of high density or high-rise buildings. She did not think that Stevens Creek Boulevard was attractive or safe, and was concerned about the proposed height of future buildings. Council gave the following direction to staff: · Chang asked staff to count which other criteria are affected with the new General Plan before deciding to delay or move forward the Crossroads Streetscape plan. · Wong asked staff to provide community input regarding the Draft General Plan in the packet for the next study session. Cynthia Wordell noted that a list of all the public meetings that have been held is printed in the back of the Briefing Book. · Chang asked how the development in the school districts factor into things. Community Development Director Steve Piasecki said staff could give the Council estimate based on what they have heard in the past. Staff explained that the next steps in the process would be: · March4 - study session · April 16 - Community meeting at the Quinlan Community Center · April - release of draft General Plan and Environmental Impact Report · May/June - Plmming Commission hearings · July - City Council hearings The Briefing Book used at this meeting to summarize the General Plan is available on- line, and the General Plan can be obtained at the library and at City Hall. Facilitator Carolyn Verheyen proposed Council continue discussions about setting outside growth parameters, street frames, and building heights at the March 4 study session. February 11, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 5 ADJOURNMENT At 8:20 p.m. the meeting was adjourned. Kimberly Smith, City Clerk For more information: Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the meeting are available for review at the City Clerk's Office, 777-3223. Televised Council meetings may be viewed live on Cable Channel 26, and may also be viewed live or on demand at www.cupertino.org. Videotapes of the televised meetings are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City Channel, 777-2364. 3-5- CITY OF CUPERJINO DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 18, 2003 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 6:45 p.m. Mayor Chang called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor Michael Chang, Vice-Mayor Sandra James, and Council members Patrick Kwok, and Dolly Sandoval. Council members absent: Richard Lowenthal. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood, Assistant City Attorney Eileen Murray, Public Works Director Ralph Qualls, Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, Senior Planner Vera Gil, Senior Planner Aarti Shrivastava, Public Information Officer Rick Kitson, and Deputy City Clerk Grace Jolmson. CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation for J.C. Penney's for its part in the Children's Shopping Spree. The recipient was not present to receive the proclamation. POSTPONEMENTS WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Council member Sandoval mentioned a letter she had received from Greg Zlotnick, the Santa Clara Valley Water District representative. The letter congratulated Cupertino's Public Works Director Ralph Quails for helping the board to move forward on a number of agenda items. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Shing-Shwang Yao, 21441 Ehn Court, talked about flooding on his street. He expressed gratitude to Council for meeting him regarding Elna Court flooding problems. He said that the main floodwaters came front Bubb Road where a manhole cover overflowed and popped up during a heavy rain. Public Works bolted down the cover, but this solution didn't work. He requested that the City level this section of Bubb Road to reduce water pressure and overflow. February 18, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR Sandoval/James moved and seconded to approve the items on the Consent Calendar as recommended, with the exception of item numbers 2, 6, 7, 8a, and 22, which were pulled for discussion. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal. Adopt resolutions accepting Accounts Payable for December 27, January 3, January 10, January 17, January 24, January 31, and February 7, Resolution Nos. 03-021 to 03-027. Adopt a resolution accepting Payroll for January 17, 31, and February 14, Resolution Nos. 03-028 to 03-030. 5. Accept the Treasurer's Budget report - December 2002. 8. Accept the Treasurer/Deputy Treasurer appointment, Resolution No. 03-031. Approve an application for an Alcoholic Beverage License, Brix BBQ Grill, 20950 Stevens Creek Blvd. 10. Approve the destruction of records from Parks and Recreation (Quinlan Community Center) and Code Enforcement, which are in excess of two years old, Resolution No. 03- 032. 11. Set a public hearing date of March 17 to consider abating a public nuisance (overgrown foliage which obstructs the street and sidewalk) at 7535 Normandy Lane, APN 366-11- 15 I, William Kettler property owner, Resolution 03-033. 12. Adopt a resolution in support of creating a 2-1-1 information and referral phone number to serve Santa Clara County residents and visitors, Resolution No. 03-034. 13. Approve the request from the De Anza Optimist Club of Cupertino for waiver of fees in the amount of $433.00 for use of the Quinlan Center's Cupertino Room for the Third Annual Cure Cancer Caf6 fundraiser on April 5, 2003. All funds raised from this event go directly to the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. 14. Approve a fee waiver request from the Cupertino Symphonic Band totaling $548.50 in facility use fees for two free public events: Winter Concert on Sunday, March 9, and a Spring Concert on May 18. Both events will be at the Quinlan Center. 15. Approve a fee waiver request in the amount of $75.00 for the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce's co-sponsored January 29 event, the "State of the City Address". 16. Approve fee waiver request from The Home of Christ in Cupertino in the approximate amount of $165.00 for their April 12 East Egg Hunt at Memorial Park. February 18, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 3 17. Partially accept improvements for clearing and grubbing, grading, paving, and driveway approach, Nagaraj and Prathima Murthy, 21470 Vai Avenue, APN 362-0'5-023 (no documentation in packet). 18. Accept City projects performed under contract (no documentation in packet): a) Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue Corridors Traffic Signal Upgrade, Project 9527 b) Homestead Arterial Management Project Phase II, Project 9530 19. Adopt a resolution accepting grant of easement, roadway, Chiping Yang and Bee Choo Yang, 10660 Santa Lucia Road, APN 342-16-034, Resolution No. 03-035. 20. Review bids and award contract for 2002 Annual Overlay, Project No. 2002-04 to Top Grade Construction in the amount of $397,444.15, and approval of a construction contingency of $40,000.00 to cover any unforeseen work required to complete the project, for a total of $437,444.15. 21. Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an Interim Agreement with Ricochet Networks, Inc. (RNI) for the payment of power costs for the pole-top radios the City inherited from Metricom upon their bm~cruptcy, Resolution No. 03-036. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) 2. Approve the minutes from the January 16, 21, 27, and 29 City Council meetings. The minutes from the January 21 meeting were amended on page 2-8, item 18 to read, "Kwok said he appreciated the work of the volunteers, especially those at St. Joseph of Cupertino Church in support of student activities." Kwok/Sandoval moved and seconded to approve the minutes as amended. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal. 6. Adopt the Annual Investment Policy. Sandoval/James moved and seconded to approve item number 6. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal. 7. Accept the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for 2001-2002. Sandoval/James moved and seconded to approve item number 7. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal. 8a. Accept the Audit Committee's recommendation to conform to the Sarbanes Oxley Act. February 18, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 4 Sandoval/James moved and seconded to approve item number 8a. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal. 22. Adopt a resolution designating Permit Parking Zone on Madrid Road, Monday through Friday, from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., when school is in session, Resolution No. 03-037. Public Works Director Ralph Qualls reviewed the staff report. Steve Zhao, 10620 Madrid Road, said that he had concerns regarding petty theft and trash left by students. He shoWed pictures via the internet that he had taken of traffic problems and trash. Robert Levy, 10802 Wilkinson Avenue, said that he is a member of TSAC, Tri-Schools Action Committee, which was formed in response to the suggested pilot program for parking in front of houses on permit parking only streets. The committee's objections to student parking were the same as the previous speaker. He said that as each street receives permits, the problem simply moves out to the next street. He suggested that the City continue to work with the school district to find a solution other than having all the students drive themselves to school and park on the city streets. Council asked staff to provide an update on the voluntary student parking permit program. James/Sandoval moved and seconded to adopt Resolution No. 03-037. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal. PUBLIC HEARINGS 23. Consider the appeal of application No. EXC-2002-10, EA-2002-25, Ron Dick (Yeh residence), APN 366-03-061, 11837 Upland Way for a hillside exception to build a 4,538 square foot residence on a prominent ridgeline and on slopes greater than 30%, to grade more than 2,500 cubic yards and to construct second story decks. The appeal was filed by Council member Richard Lowenthal. (The appeal has been withdrawn by Council member Lowenthal). No documentation in packet. ' Mayor Chang opened the public heating at 7:22 p.m. Pei-Pei You, 11840 Upland Way, said that when considering hillside buildings, aesthetics and the geological stability of the hill should be considered in order to not damage the foundation of the hill itself. She said the property in question has been a landslide site in the past and the applicant wanted to cut away 24 cubic feet of soil to build a deck. She was concerned about the safety of surrounding homes if a landslide should occur. The public hearing was closed at 7:27 p.m. and Council took no action. February 18, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 5 PLANNING APPLICATIONS UNFINISHED BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS 24. Adopt a resolution approving the Cupertino Amateur Radio Emergency Services (CARES) Standards and Training, Resolution No. 03-038. City Manager David Knapp reviewed the staff report. CARES Emergency Coordinator Jim Oberhoffer said that the training program came about as a result of the South County Croy fire and the September 11 disaster to provide appropriate training to mutual aid responders. He said that the training provides for a consistent response, sets a standard and example for other cities and the County to put together their own training plans, and helps the City's Office of Emergency Services to know what to do. The following individuals were acknowledged as CARES members: · Dan Pickering · Bob Eggers · Ken Foot · Jake Zander · Andy Zander · Marsha Hovey (Cupertino's Emergency Preparedness Coordinator) James/Kwok moved to adopt Resolution No. 03-038. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal. 25. Release the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program Draft Citizen Participation plan for public review, create a CDBG Steering Committee, and authorize staff to seek four Cupertino citizens to serve on the committee, Resolution No. 03-039. Senior Planner Vera Gil reviewed the staff report and gave background on the program via a PowerPoint presentation. Sandoval/James moved to adopt Resolution No. 03-039. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal. 26. Discuss the schedule for the Crossroads Plan. Senior Planner Aarti Shrivastava reviewed the staff report via a PowerPoint presentation. February 18, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 6 Norm Hackford, 10346 Tonita Way, was concerned about unattractive buildings being too close to the street. He wanted the General Plan to be followed as-is regarding setbacks. He was also concerned about building heights and expectations of other builders regarding new General Plan rules. He suggested that Council adopt a new plan first before developing the Crossroads Streetscape Plan. Joanne Tong, 22339 McClellan Road, asked Council to hold off on voting for the Crossroads Plan until the General Plan was completed. E.J. Conens, 10480 Pineville, was concerned that the website didn't have information about the Crossroads Plan. He said that the Crossroads Plan was not pedestrian friendly and was not in favor of building big buildings. Homer Tong, 22339 McClellan Road, said that Council shouldn't rush into doing new developments and to give the community a chance to react and interact during Council and staff discussions on items. Edward Britt, 20850 Peppertree Lane, was not in favor of Council voting on March 3 regarding the Crossroads Plan and asked that Council rethink what is already in the General Plan regarding height density. Mark Burns, Cupertino Chamber of Commerce President, was not in favor of Council voting on March 3rd. He said that information from the Community Congress was not specific enough about what the community wants regarding how to make Cupertino a better city. He wasn't sure that retailers would want to move closer to the curb or have other buildings built in front of them. He urged Council to take its time and allow for more community input. Patricia Smith, 10317 Cold Harbor Avenue, was concerned about height, density, traffic issues, and the impact on Cupertino's schools. She encouraged Council to take its time in making any decision on the Crossroads Plan. Shishir Mukherjee, 1174 Scotland Drive, said that the Crossroads Plan was not referenced in the General Plan briefing book except as a footnote to one of the maps. He encouraged Council to make a decision about the General Plan separately from the Crossroads Plan so that the community has a chance to give their opinion. Council concurred to hold the advertised public hearing on March 3, 2003. 27. Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 1912: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 2.40 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Regarding the Disaster Council." City Manager David Knapp reviewed the staff report. February 18, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 7 Emergency Services Coordinator Marsha Hovey reviewed the guidelines of Homeland Security and the Disaster Council. The Deputy City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Sandoval/James moved and seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the Deputy City Clerk's reading would constitute the first reading thereof. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal. 28. Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 1913: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Sections 2.88.010 of the City's Ordinance Code Modifying the Composition of the Audit Committee." Director of Administrative Services Carol Atwood reviewed the staff report. The Deputy City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Sandoval/James moved and seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the Deputy City Clerk's reading would constitute the first reading thereof. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Sandoval. Noes: None. Absent: Lowenthal. ORDINANCES - None STAFF REPORTS 29. Receive a status report on General Fund Revenue and Expenditures (no documentation in packet). Director of Administrative Services Carol Atwood gave an oral report. Her comments included: Property Tax has increased $300,000 from last year · Sales Tax has decreased $1 million from last year · Hotel Tax (TOT) has increased $20,000 year to date due to the Cypress Hotel · Utility Users Tax has decreased 5% down from last year (up from 17% last month) Franchise fees and other taxes are holding their own · Building permits are $350,000 over last year · Motor Vehicle Fees are $175,000 over last year · Interest rates are down and the rate of return on our portfolio is 40% of past, but this was already reflected in the budget · Most of the other revenues are holding their own · Pmticipation of $1 million drop in revenue after adding all the numbers · Departments are slowing spending and are only over ½ of 1% over last year · A budget adjustment will be brought to Council in March which will incorporate some increases in unforeseen areas such as retiring medical and health costs February 18, 2003 Cupertino City Council Page 30. Receive a monthly status report on the Cupertino Civic Center and Library Project. Public Works Director Ralph Quails reviewed the staff report. His comments included: · No unusual changes and the project is on schedule and on budget · The construction fence is up and schools will provide artwork for the fence · Deconstruction of the library will occur over the next 2-3 weeks · Grinding equipment is on-site · Noise monitoring equipment is on-site · Wire mesh peepholes will be put in COUNCIL REPORTS Council members highlighted the activities of their committees and various community events. CLOSED SESSION - None ADJOURNMENT At 9:15 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to March 3 at 5:00 p.m. in Conference Room A to conduct interviews for vacancies on the Planning and Fine Arts Commissions, Cupertino City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue. Grace Jolmson, Deputy City Clerk For more information: Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the meeting are available for review at the City Clerk's Office, 777-3223. Televised Council meetings may be viewed live on Cable Channel 26, and may also be viewed live or on demand at www.cupertino.org. Videotapes of the televised meetings are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City Channel, 777-2364. DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 03-040 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING FEBRUARY 14, 2003 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Dir~mi~ PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 3rd day of 1,{arch ., 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 02/13/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FLrND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_da~e between "02/10/2003" and "02/14/2003" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 599065 02/14/03 1695 3M 2708405 1020 599065 02/14/03 1695 3M 2708405 1020 599065 02/14/03 1695 3M 2708405 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599066 02/14/03 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 599066 02/14/03 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 599066 02/14/03 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 599066 02/14/03 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 599066 02/14/03 4 A T & T 1108501 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599067 02/14/03 2885 ADANAC FIRE PROTECTION, 1108505 1020 599067 02/14/03 2885 ADANAC FIRE PROTECTION, 1108501 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599068 02/14/03 26 AIR FILTER CONTROL INC 42392~2 1020 599069 02/14/03 28 AIRGAS NCN 6308840 1020 599069 02/14/03 28 AIRGAS NCN 1108501 1020 599069 02/14/03 28 AIRGAS NCN 1108314 1020 599069 02/14/03 28 AIRGAS NCN 2708405 1020 599069 02/14/03 28 AIRGAS NCN 1108503 1020 599069 02/14/03 28 AIRGAS NCN 1108303 1020 599069 02/14/03 28 AIRGAS NCN 2708405 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599070 02/14/03 2276 ALHJkMBRA 1104510 1020 599070 02/14/03 2276 AL~RA 1104510 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599071 02/14/03 1795 ALL CNEM SUPPLY CO INC 5208003 1020 599071 02/14/03 1795 ALL CHEM SUPPLY CO INC 5208003 1020 599071 02/14/03 1795 ;%LL CREM SUPPLY CO INC 5208003 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599072 02/14/03 2636 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS AS 1108601 1020 599073 02/14/03 44 AMERICAN RED CROSS 1104400 1020 599074 02/14/03 2799 APPLE COMPUTER INC 5208003 1020 599075 02/14/03 2298 ARCH WIRELESS 1106400 1020 599075 02/14/03 2298 ~JRCH WIRELESS 1108501 1020 599075 02/14/03 2298 ;%RCH WIRELESS 6104800 1020 599075 02/14/03 2298 ARCH WIRELESS 1107501 1020 599075 02/14/03 2298 ARCH WIRELESS 1104400 1020 599076 02/14/03 2298 ARCR WIRELESS 1106265 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599076 02/14/03 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... 3990 30" X 50 yARDS 3990 30" X 50 YARDS 3990 30" X 50 YARDS FEB2003 STATEMENT FEB2003 STATEMENT FEB2003 STATEMENT FEB2003 STATEMENT FEB03 STATEMENT LABOR/MATERIALS L~kBOR/MATERIALS SUPPLIES FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN pLrRC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PI/RC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PI/RC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC EMPLOYEE DRINKING WATE EMPLOYEE DRINKING WATE SUPPLIES 17406 SUPPLIES 17305 SUPPLIES 17305 7 COPIES CEU C7 1/23/0 CERTIFICATION FEES SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 2/01-3/01/03 2/01-3/01/03 2/01-3/01/03 2/01-3/01/03 2/01-3/01/03 2/01-3/01/03 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC SALES TAX PAGE 1 AMOUNT 0.00 322.23 0.00 1725.24 0.00 495.70 0.00 2543.17 0.00 19.80 0.00 32.84 0.00 19.50 0.00 19,50 0.00 20.05 0,00 111.39 0.00 400.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 800.00 0.00 262.66 0,00 52.58 0.00 52.57 0.00 52.57 0.00 40.I2 0.00 E 0.00 5 0.00 52.57 0.00 355.55 0.00 126.50 0.00 217.90 0.00 344.40 0.00 60.96 0.00 261.20 0.00 37.78 0.00 359.94 0.00 49,00 0.00 105.00 0.00 2358.87 0,00 13.18 0.00 81.55 0.00 13.59 0,00 7.59 0.00 19,09 O~00 11.99 0.00 146.59 0.00 ? RUN DATE 02/13/03 TIME 14:29:09 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 02/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND %CTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_da~e between "02/10/2003" and "02/14/2003" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 599076 02/14/03 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840 1020 599076 02/14/03 968 BAP AUTO P;LRTS 6300840 1020 599076 02/14/03 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308040 1020 599076 02/14/83 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599077 02/14/03 2489 BARCO PRODUCTS COMPANY 1108502 1020 599078 02/14/03 720 BAT~fERY SYSTEMS 6308840 1020 599078 02/14/03 720 BATTERY SYSTEMS 6308840 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599079 02/14/03 M BAUSCH, B. FRED 580 1020 599080 02/14/03 867 BRIAR K~GAS FOLrLK 2709430 1020 599081 02/14/03 1066 BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRI 5208003 1020 599082 02/14/03 133 1020 599082 02/14/03 133 1020 599082 02/14/03 133 TOTAL CHECK J 599083 02/14/03 2633 CAL-LINE EQUIPMENT CO IN 6308840 CAL-LINE EQUIPMENT CO IN 1108408 CAL LINE EQUIPMENT CO IN 1108408 CALIFORNIA BINGO SERVICE 5506549 1020 599084 02/14/03 2887 CA/~IFORNIA ~/NICIPAL 1104000 1020 599085 02/14/03 130 C3%LIFORNIA PARK ~ RECR 5606600 1020 599086 02/14/03 130 CALIFOP. NIA PARK ~ RECR 5806449 1020 599087 02/14/03 M2003 C34NTON DELIGHTS 5506549 1020 599088 02/14/03 2643 CAPITOL GMC 6309840 1020 599088 02/14/03 2643 CAPITOL GMC 6308840 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599089 02/14/03 2232 COkRIAGA, LOURDES 110 1020 599089 02/14/03 2232 C3~IAGA, LOUP~ES 110 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599090 02/14/03 146 CASH 1020 599090 02/14/03 146 CASH 1020 599090 02/14/03 146 C~kSB 1020 599090 02/14/03 146 CASH 1020 599090 02/14/03 146 CASH TOTAL CHECK 1106647 5806649 5806349 1186265 1101060 1020 599091 02/14/03 147 CASH 1020 599091 02/14/03 147 CASH 599091 02/14/03 147 CASH 5506549 5506549 5506549 ..... DESCRIPTION FY 2082-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC BIKE PACK 8751 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC Refund: Check - Return P.O.#00030281 CARRYOVE RECYCL~LES DEC2002 RET~ED FUEL FILTERS SUPPLIES PARTS/SUPPLIES 8773 BINGO SUPPLIES DLrES ~24473 & 28834 MBRSHP R_NWL M.O'DOWD MBRSHP DUES K.LEVY CHINESE N.YEAR LLTNCH ENGINE REPAIRS 8778 ENGINE REPAIRS 8778 SSGARNSMNT CSGARNSMNT PETTY CASH 1/14-2/11 PETTY CASH 1/14-2/11 PETTY CASH 1/14-2/11 PETTY CASH 1/14-2/11 PETTY CASH 1/14-2/11 PETTY CASH 1/14-2/06 PETTY CASH 1/14-2/06 PETTY CASH 1/14-2/06 SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 2 AMOUNT 24.55 176.71 33.53 14.19 283.84 321.00 142.78 64.90 207.68 100.00 38823.73 492.35 -47.11 50.70 507.38 510.97 302.45 120.00 125.00 125.00 550.00 281.67 200.00 481.67 103.84 306.50 410.34 24.46 11.97 130.57 25.76 7.32 200.08 45.39 RUN DATE 02/13/03 TIME 14:29:10 - FIN3%NCIAL ACCOUNTING 02/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FLrbrD SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.~rans_date between "02/10/2003" and "02/14/2003" FI/ND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FLrND/DEPT 1020 599091 02/14/03 147 CASH 5506549 1020 599091 02/14/03 147 CASH 5506549 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599092 02/14/03 148 CASH 1108501 1020 599092 02/14/03 148 CASH 1108408 1020 599092 02/14/03 148 CASH 1108314 1020 599092 02/14/03 148 CASH 1108312 1020 599092 02/14/03 148 CASH 1108508 TOTAL CHECK 102o 599093 02/14/03 149 CASH 1104400 1020 599093 02/14/03 149 C~H 1104530 1020 599093 02/14/03 149 CASH 1108001 1020 599093 02/14/03 149 CASH 1104100 lO20 599093 02/14/03 149 CASH 1104300 1020 599093 02/14/03 149 CASH 1104000 1020 599093 02/14/03 149 CASH 6104800 1020 599093 02/14/03 149 CASH 1104300 1020 599093 02/14/03 149 CASH 1101000 10~0 599093 02/14/03 149 CASH 1103300 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599094 02/14/03 155 CENTR3%L WHOLESALE R~3RSER 1108315 1020 599095 02/14/03 1057 1020 599095 02/14/03 1057 TOTAL CHECK CERIDIAN BENEFITS SERVIC 110 CERIDIAN BENEFITS SERVIC 110 1020 599096 02/14/o3 1156 C]{A 110 1020 599097 02/14/03 157 JASON H CF~ 5806249 1020 599098 02/14/03 ME2003 CI{AO, GARY 1104510 1020 599099 02/14/03 M CHOI, SEUNG 580 1020 599100 02/14/03 169 CLEARY CONSULTANTS INC 2709430 1020 599101 02/14/03 M2003 CLERK RECORDER 1104300 1020 599102 02/14/03 M2003 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 1108602 1020 599103 02/14/03 191 1020 599103 02/14/03 191 TOTAL CHECK CUPERTINO CHAMBER OF COM 1101000 CUPERTINO C~ER OF COM 1108001 1020 599104 02/14/03 2085 DB PROMOTIONS 1103300 1020 599105 02/14/03 210 DEEP CLIFF ASSOCIATES L 5806449 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... PETTY CASH 1/14-2/06 PETTY CASH 1/14-2/06 PETTY CASH 1/21-2/07 PETTY CASH 1/21-2/07 PETTY CASH 1/21-2/07 PETTY CASH 1/21-2/07 PETTY CASH 1/21-2/07 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/13 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/13 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/13 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/13 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/13 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/13 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/13 PETTY C~H 2/03-2/13 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/13 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/13 SUPPLIES 15095 *FLEX HLTH/240125 *FLEX DEP/240125 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR EDUCATIONAL RE- IMBURSE Refund: Check - SPRING SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR OATH/FILING NOTARY BON TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAYOR/B . SCOUTS LUNCHEO D. MARKS/LUNCHEON COMMISIONER AWARD SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMOUNT 14.47 125.19 271.33 35.00 24.92 21.04 5.75 6.01 92.72 B.44 9.74 28.36 2.12 38.89 30.95 30.22 6.48 183.20 470.05 349.94 819.99 144.85 43.75 600,00 109.00 5158.50 39.00 119.73 175.00 25.00 200.00 228.18 1856.00 RUN DATE 02/13/03 TIME 14:29:10 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 02/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO FUND - 110 - GENER3kL FUND CASH ACCT C~ECK NO 1020 599106 1020 599107 1020 599108 1020 599109 1020 599110 1020 599111 1020 599112 1020 599112 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599113 1020 599114 1020 599114 1020 599114 TOTAL CHE~K 3 599115 1020 599115 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599116 1020 599117 1020 599117 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599118 1020 599119 1020 599120 1020 599120 1020 599120 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599121 1020 599122 1020 599123 1020 599123 1020 599123 1020 599123 '--~ 599123 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FU~/DEPT 02/14/03 M2003 DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHI 1108601 02/14/03 223 DON & MIKE'S SWEEPING IN 2308004 02/14/03 228 DURAY'S TIRE SERVICE INC 6308840 02/14/03 2740 ELECTRONIC LOCK SOLUTION 4239222 02/14/03 242 EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEFT 110 02/14/03 243 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 110 02/14/03 253 EXC~IkNGE LINEN SERVICE 5606680 02/14/03 253 EXC}LZkNGE LINEN SERVICE 5606680 02/14/03 M2003 FANTASIA PERFORMING 5506549 02/14/03 260 FEDER3kL EXPRESS CORP 110 02/14/03 260 FEDER3%L EXPRESS CORP 1108601 02/14/03 260 FEDER~ EXPRESS CORP 1107501 02/14/03 262 FIRST PI~CE INC 1104300 02/14/03 262 FIRST pLACE INC 1104300 02/14/03 2843 FOLGER GRAPHIC INC 1103400 02/14/03 268 FOSTER BROS SEC~JRITY SYS 1108501 02/14/03 268 FOSTER BROS SECURITY SYS 5606620 02/14/03 2479 DONNA FR3~NKEL 5506549 02/14/03 277 JOHN FL~G 5806249 02/14/03 281 G~RDENL~ 1108408 02/14/03 281 GARDENI~D 1108408 02/14/03 281 G~J{DENI2%ND 1108408 02/14/03 776 GCS WESTERN POWER & EQUI 6308840 02/14/03 M GOUSSON, DELPHINE 580 02/14/03 298 GRAINGER INC 1108314 02/14/03 298 GRAINGER INC 1108504 02/14/03 298 GRAINGER INC 6308840 02/14/03 298 GRAINGER INC 1108314 02/14/03 298 GRAINGER INC 6308840 PAGE ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 2003 VEHICLE CODE BOOK 0.00 29.00 EXTRA SWEEP WOLFE/FTHI 0.00 195.00 STEERING REPAIRS 8764 0.00 613.07 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 601.30 SIT/932-0014-5 0.00 16817.73 SDI/776-5260-0 0.00 898,t2 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 35.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN pLrRC 0.00 268.96 0.00 303.96 CHINESE N.YR PARTY 2/2 0.00 50.00 COURIER SERVICE 0.00 30.01 COURIER SERVICE 0.00 73.69 COURIER SERVICE 0.00 19.99 0.00 123.69 N~k~4EPLATES 17124 0.00 49.30 NAMBPI~TES 17123 0.0O 46.55 0.00 95.85 BID REQUEST ~%ND PRINT 0.00 2697.11 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 86.34 RE]CEY DOORS/NEW LOCKS 0,00 615,54 0.00 701.88 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 140.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0,00 169.75 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8760 0.00 539.51 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8772 0.00 152.47 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8774 0.00 526.05 0.00 1218.03 NEW LOADER BUCKET FOR 0.00 2699.51 Refund: Check - WINTER 0.00 45.00 PkRTS/SUPPLIES 8757 0.00 7.60 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PLrRC 0.00 13.54 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 47.59 P~JlTS/SUPPLIES 8757 0.00 104.75 FY 2002 2003 OPEN pLrRC 0.O0 161.76 RUN DATE 02/13/03 TIME 14:29:11 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 02/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 5 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FEEFD SELECTION CRITERIA: transacC.trans_date becween "02/10/2003" and "02/14/2083" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND C/%~R ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 599123 02/14/03 298 GRAINGER INC 1108303 1020 599123 02/14/03 298 GP~INGER INC 1108303 1020 599123 02/14/03 298 GI{AINGER INC 6308840 1020 599123 02/14/03 298 GP~AINGER INC 6308840 1020 599123 02/14/03 298 GP. AINGER INC 1108303 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599124 02/14/03 2630 GREGORY B. BRAGG & ASSOC 6204550 1020 599125 02/14/03 M GULERIA, GAl/RI 580 1020 599126 02/14/03 2531 GLrRU ELECTRIC 1108504 1020 599126 02/14/03 2531 GURU ELECTRIC 1108501 1020 599126 02/14/03 2531 GURU ELECTRIC 1108505 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599127 02/14/03 899 GUZZARDO & ASSOCIATES IN 4259313 1020 599128 02/14/03 322 HAWKINS TI~AFFIC SAFETY S 2708405 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 0.00 W.COMP ADMIN FEB03 0.00 Refund: Check - REFLIAFD 0.00 L~OR/MATERIALS 0.00 I2%BOR/MATERIALS 0.00 I~OR/MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 PUBLIC WORKS CONTI{ACT PARTS/SUPPLIES 15133 0.00 0.00 AMOUZCT 108.02 236.03 16.57 23.79 36.04 755.69 1575.00 t00.00 950.00 1940.00 950.00 3840.00 14696.45 393.55 1020 599129 02/14/03 2540 HILTI 1108508 SUPPLIES 0.00 29.28 PA~RTS/SUPPLIES 8574 PARTS/SUPPLIES 20510 P/kRTS/SUPPLIES 15047 PARTS/SUPPLIES 15048 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8742 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8555 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24588 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24587 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24581 PIMRTS/SUPPLIES 24580 P/MRTS/SUPPLIES 15930 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8756 PARTS/SUPPLIES 15931 PARTS/SUPPLIES 20521 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8741 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8717 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24399 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24600 Pi~RTS/SUPPLIEE 3441 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8723 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8724 PARTS/SUPPLIES 26738 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24598 PARTS/SUPPLIES 15928 PARTS/SUPPLIES 10698 PARTS/SUPPLIES 24561 PAHTS/SUPPLIES 26740 PARTS/SUPPLIES 15046 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DE~OT/GECF 1108312 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108312 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108312 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108312 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 NOME DEPOT/GECF 1108312 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108312 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108303 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108303 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108314 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 NOME DEPOT/GECF 1108314 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 NOME DEPOT/GECF 5606660 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 NOME DEPOT/OECF 1108303 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 5606620 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108830 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 NOME DEPOT/GECF 1108312 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108408 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108303 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/OECF 1108501 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 2708405 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108312 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108312 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108501 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108303 1020 699131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 5606620 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108315 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 NOME DEPOT/GECF 1108407 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108506 1020 599131 02/14/03 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108312 TOTAL CHECK 3f 40.70 38.57 34.56 34.56 34.49 21.48 35.32 158.75 257.99 51.26 254.59 46.69 39.41 46.36 26r RUN DATE 02/13/03 TIME 14:29:12 - FINANCI~kL ACCOUNTING 02/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUSED ~CTION CRITERIA: transact.~rans_date between "02/10/2003" and "02/14/2003, FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FLrND/DEPT 1020 599132 02/14/03 1898 AUTOMATIC RAIN CO. 1108321 1020 599132 02/14/03 1898 AUTOMATIC RAIN CO. 1108315 1020 599132 02/14/03 1898 AUTOMATIC PAIN CO. 1108303 1020 599132 02/14/03 1898 AUTOMATIC RAIN CO. 1108312 1020 899132 02/14/03 1898 AUTOMATIC PAIN CO, 1108302 1020 599132 02/14/03 1898 AUTOMATIC PAIN CO. 1108315 1020 599132 02/14/03 1898 AUTOMATIC PAIN CO. 1108321 1020 599132 02/14/03 1898 AUTOMATIC PAIN CO. 1108314 1020 599132 02/14/03 1898 AUTOMATIC R~IN CO. 1108303 1020 599132 02/14/03 1898 AUTOMATIC PAIN CO. 1108314 1020 599132 02/14/03 1898 ALFfOMATIC RAIN CO. 1108312 1020 599132 02/14/03 1898' AUTOMATIC RAIN CO. 1108302 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599133 02/14/03 341 1020 599134 02/14/03 343 1020 599135 02/14/09 2181 1020 599136 02/14/03 2299 J 599137 02/14/03 995 1020 599138 02/14/03 2455 1020 599138 02/14/03 2455 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599139 02/14/03 353 1020 599140 02/14/03 2782 1020 599141 02/14/03 M 1020 599142 02/14/03 2886 1020 599143 02/14/03 1062 1020 599144 02/14/03 369 1020 599144 02/14/03 369 1020 599144 02/14/03 369 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599145 02/14/03 1630 1020 599146 02/14/03 807 1020 599147 02/14/03 2882 ~ % 599148 02/14/03 M2003 ICE CENTER OF CUPERTINO 5806449 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 IMSA:INT'L MUNICIPAL SIG 2708405 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY & HAZM 1108201 INSERV COMPA2qY 1108502 INTEGRATED INFO. SYSTEMS 6109858 INTEGRATED INFO. SYSTEMS 6109858 IRON MOUNTAIN 1104300 KALYANI JAWADEKAR 5806249 Jazanmard, Gholmanreza 550 KATHLEEN ELLIOTT 2204011 KAYE-SMITH 5208003 KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC 1108303 KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC 1108406 KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC 1108303 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INC 5806449 C}tARLES KILIAN 1101500 ROBERT A. KIM 1101000 KIM, YOUNG CP~ANG 110 PAGE 6 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 36.30 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 412.15 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 412.16 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0,00 412.15 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 412.16 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 36.30 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 412.15 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 36.30 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 36.29 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 412.15 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0,00 36.30 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 36.29 0.00 2690.70 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 3388.00 *ICMA 0.00 6562.75 P~L DUES D.FERGUSON 0.00 80.00 TR3%INING/W.BRIDGE 0.00 400.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 423.26 CITY CODE UPDATES 0.00 800.00 CITY CODE UPDATES 0.00 100.00 0.00 900.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN pLTRC 0.00 355.67 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 136.00 Refund: Check - Deposi 0.00 750.00 TLT REIMBURSEMENTS 0.00 79.05 STICKERS 17304 0.00 317.93 RETL~N PAINT SUPPLIES O.00 -92.55 PAINT SUPPLIES 8754 0,00 414.77 PAINT SUPPLIES 24586 0.00 43.30 0.00 365.52 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 8896.10 LORMAN SEMINAR 0,00 329.00 EDIT VIDEO/STATE OF CI 0.00 680.00 REFD DEVELOPE MAINT FE 0.00 430.06 RUN DATE 02/13/03 TIME 14:29:12 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 02/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOLTNTING PERIOD: 8/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "02/10/2003" and "02/14/2.003" FETND ~ 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 599149 02/14/03 1705 1020 599150 02/14/03 377 1020 599151 02/14/03 2323 1020 599152 02/14/03 M 1020 599153 02/14/03 M 1020 599154 02/14/03 2734 1020 599155 02/14/03 1602 1020 599156 02/14/03 1175 1020 599156 02/14/03 1175 TOTAL CRECK 1020 599157 02/14/03 2567 1020 599158 02/14/03 447 1020 599158 02/14/03 447 1020 599158 02/14/03 447 1020 599158 02/14/03 447 1020 599158 02/14/03 447 1020 599158 02/14/03 447 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599159 02/14/03 2405 1020 599160 02/14/03 465 1020 599160 02/14/03 465 TOT/%5 CHECK 1020 599161 02/14/03 466 1020 599162 02/14/03 M 1020 599163 02/14/03 1167 1020 599164 02/14/03 475 1028 599165 02/14/03 302 1020 599166 02/14/03 488 1020 599167 02/14/03 2861 1020 599168 02/14/03 2836 1020 599168 02/14/03 2836 KM & D MACHINE 6308840 PETER KOEHLER · 5806249 KWIK-WAY MUFFLER SERVICE 6308840 LEE, JOSEPH 580 LEVESQUE, SYLVIE 580 CHARLES LORETTA 5806249 MBIA MUNISERVICES COMPAN 1100000 MCWHORTER & YOI/NG 1108101 MCWHORTER & YOUNG 5706450 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 CHRIS MORTON 5806449 MOUNTAIN VIEW GARDEN CEN 1108303 MOUNTAIN VIEW GARDEN CEN 1108303 MPA DESIGN 2709447 Men, Li-Miin 550 N.C. METAL PAINTING INC 1108201 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RE 1108312 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPEN 110 NEWNLAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 2708405 NORTHERN SAFETY CO., INC 1108005 NORTRAX WEST 6308840 NORTRAX WEST 6308840 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... REPAIRS 8769 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR REPLACED MUFFLER 8715 Refund: Check - Return Refund: Check - SPRING SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SALES TILX SERV 3RD QTR SUPPLIES 21980/21848 OFFICE SUPPLIES 23033 J TRYBUS 385960533 FY 2002-2003 OPEN pURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN pLTRC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002 2003 OPEN pLTRC SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR Refund: Check - SFO Ai BEEFY T W/POCKET TTAN 2/05-3/04 RENTALS *NATAL DEF FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC SUPPLIES 8748 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SALES TAX PAGE 7 AMOUNT 0.00 191.31 0.00 117.00 0.00 178.61 0.00 750.00 0.00 168.00 0.00 550.00 0.00 1250.00 0.00 67.12 0.00 21.31 0.00 88.43 0.00 223.00 0.00 78.93 0.00 7r 0.00 78.93 0.00 214.78 0.00 78.93 0.00 656.36 0.00 1562.75 0.00 544.92 0.00 124.82 0.00 669.74 0.00 154.08 0.00 45.00 0.00 4740.54 0.00 41.65 0.00 17577.36 0.00 520.00 0.00 68.51 O.O0 59.41 RUN DATE 02/13/03 TIME 14:29:13 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 02/13/03 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: ECTION CRITERIA: 8/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND ~ransact.trans date between "02/10/2003" and "02/14/2003" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 599168 02/14/03 2836 NORTP~AX WEST TOTAL CHECK 6308840 1020 599169 02/14/03 2639 NOVA PARTNERS INC 4239222 1020 599170 02/14/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1103500 1020 599170 02/14/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104300 1020 599170 02/14/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108201 1020 599170 02/14/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1106200 102o 599170 02/14/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104300 1020 599170 02/14/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1107301 1020 599170 02/14/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1107503 1020 599170 02/14/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108201 1020 599170 02/14/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104300 1020 599170 02/14/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104300 1020 599170 02/14/03 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104300 TOTkL CHECK 1020 599171 02/14/03 501 OPEP, ATING ENGINEERS #3 110 1020 599172 02/14/03 500 OPER3kTING E/~GINEERS pUB 1104510 1020 599172 02/14/03 500 OPERATING ENGINEERS PUB 1104510 9 599172 02/14/03 500 OPERATING ENGINEERS PUB 110 AL CHECK 1020 599173 02/14/03 507 DA~N OSBORNE DBA:OSBORNE 6308840 1020 599174 02/14/03 833 P E R S 110 1020 599174 02/14/03 833 P E R S t10 1020 599174 02/14/03 833 P E E S 110 1020 599174 02/14/03 833 P E R S 110 1020 599174 02/14/03 833 P E R S 110 1020 599174 02/14/03 833 P E R S 110 1028 599174 02/14/03 833 P E R S 110 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599175 02/14/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108503 1020 599175 02/14/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108201 1020 599175 02/14/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108509 1020 599175 02/14/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108508 1020 599175 02/14/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 1020 599175 02/14/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 5606620 1020 599175 02/14/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108507 1020 599175 02/14/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 5606640 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599176 02/14/03 511 PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM 1108501 1020 599177 02/14/03 2884 PACIFIC COAST TP, ANE SERV 1108505 599179 02/14/03 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108506 ..... DESCRIPTION PARTS 8752 DEPOSIT PG&E OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES UNION DUES PAGE SALES TAX AMOUNT 0.00 488.87 0.00 615.40 0.00 1500.00 0.00 102.72 0.00 29.86 0.00 79.40 0.00 17.18 0.00 34.36 0.0D 36.80 0.00 221.08 0.0D 27.66 0.00 42.19 0.00 59.53 0.00 15.47 0.00 666.25 0.00 586.71 H & W SPOUSAL FEB03 0.00 4575.00 H & W RETIREE FEB03 0.00 898.00 H & W EMPLOYEES FEB03 0.00 4490.00 0.00 9963.00 TIME/MATERIALS *PERS BYBK PERS EMPLY PERS 1959 PERS EMPLY PERS SPEC *PERS BYBK PERS BUYBK 1/28-2/27/03 1/28-2/27/03 1/28-2/27/03 1/28-2/27/03 1/28-2/27/03 1/28/-2/27/03 1/28-2/27/03 1/28-2/27/03 #2719771 12/7-2/06 LABOR 12/27-1/29 0.00 686.89 0.00 180.14 0.00 25378.01 0.00 119.04 0.00 216.60 0.00 112.39 0.00 462.65 0.00 37.52 0.00 26506.35 0.0O 54.45 0.00 249.15 0.00 54.45 0.0O 60.21 0.0O 114.22 O.OO 159.78 0.00 54.45 0.00 191.21 0.00 937.92 0.00 179.27 0.00 250.00 0.00 120.97 RUN DATE 02/13/03 TIME 14:29:14 - FINARCI3%L ACCOUNTING o2/13/o3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: SELECTION CRITERIA: FI/~FD - ll0 - GENER3%L FUBFD CITY OF CUPERTINO 8/03 CMECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FI/ND transact.trans date between "02/10/2003" and "02/14/2003" C3%SH ACCT C~ECK NO ISSUE DT 1020 599178 02/14/03 513 1020 599178 02/14/03 513 1020 599178 02/14/03 513 TOTAL CHECK 1020 899179 02/14/03 518 1020 599180 02/14/03 ME2003 1020 599181 02/14/03 524 1020 599182 02/14/o3 526 1020 599183 02/14/03 538 1020 599184 02/14/03 2388 1020 599185 02/14/03 1929 1020 599186 02/14/03 M2003 1020 599187 02/14/03 2278 1020 599188 02/14/03 1406 1020 599189 02/14/03 2441 1020 599190 02/14/03 581 1020 599191 02/14/03 594 1020 599192 02/14/03 601 1020 599193 02/14/03 614 1020 599194 02/14/03 2170 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 .............. VENDOR ............. FI/~/DEPT PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 5606620 PACIFIC GA~ & ELECTRIC ( 5606620 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108506 PACIFIC WEST SECLrRITY IN 1108504 pAMELA TREDER 1100000 PD PROGR3~ING INC 1108601 PENINSLri~ DIGITAJ~ IMAGIN 4239222 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROG 110 PETERSON'S VIDEO TRANSFE 1101000 PI~ING RESOURCE ASSOCI 1107302 PSIDB, INC. 1100000 QUALLS, RALPH 1108001 RAINES CHEVORLET 6308840 RENEE P~AMSEY 5806249 RELIABLE 1107503 RIVERVIEW SYSTEMS GROUP 1106500 ROYAL BP, ASS INC 6308840 SAFE MOVES 1108601 SAN JOSE GENEPJ%TOR 6308840 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~lCY 1108407 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~2~Y 1108407 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/~Y 1108407 SAN JOSE WATER COMP;tNY 1108407 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108506 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~NY 1108321 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108506 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 ..... DESCRIPTION 12/27-1/28 12/27-1/28 12/27-1/28 SERVICE CAJ~L 1/29/03 CK 8/30/02 LOST IN PLAI ;~NI3AL UPDATES AND SUP PERS LTC/~2405 DVD COPIES 16461 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE F REFD DUPL BUS.LICENSE CONF 1/23-24 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR OFFICE SUPPLIES SOUND SYS MAINTENANCE PARTS/SUPPLIES 24482 SCHOOL RODEOS 1/1/03-1 REPAIRS 8503 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 SkLES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 9 AMOUNT 155.22 69.47 476 . 77 822.43 155.83 615 . 73 750.00 170 . 14 159.24 202 . 97 9049.85 98.00 478.51 33 1322.50 524.34 536.86 43.63 3000.00 135.31 118.64 123.81 120.35 129.85 10.78 52.95 172.28 29.04 3' RI/N DATE 02/13/03 TIME 14:29:14 - FINANCIAL ACCOLrNTING 02/13/03 ACCOUNTING 'CTION PERIOD: 8/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND CRITERIA: transact.tran$_date between "02/10/2003" and "02/14/2003" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 1020 CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 599198 02/14/03 625 SA!~ JOSE WATER COMPABrY 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~NY 1108314 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~t~Df 1108315 599198 02/14/03 625 SAIq JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SAI~ JOSE WATER COMPAN~ 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAN"f 1108321 599198 02/14/03 625 S;~N JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 599198 02/14/03 628 SAI~ JOSE WATER COMPA/~ 1108315 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/~Y 1108303 599198 02/14/03 625 S~ JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 599198 02/14/03 625 S~N JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606640 599198 02/14/03 625 SA/qJOSE WATER COMPA/qY 1108504 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAi~Y 5606620 599198 02/14/03 625 S~N JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 599198 02/14/03 625 SA};JOSE WATER COMPA/~Y 4209116 599198 02/14/03 625 S/kNJOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~/qY 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108505 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAA!Y 1108505 599198 02/14/03 625 S;~NJOSE WATER COMPA~!Y 1108408 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAN~f 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/~Y 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SA/~JOSE WATER COMPA/~Y 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN J6SE WATER COMPANY 1108407 599198 02/14/03 628 S]~NJOSE WATER COMP/LN-Y 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 S/%NJOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SAi~JOSE WATER COMP/~NY 1108504 599198 02/14/03 625 S/~NJOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SA/qJOSE WATER COMP~NY 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SA/qJOSE WATER COMPAN~f 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA-kPf 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/~Y 1108407 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5706510 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108302 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108507 599198 02/14/03 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 DESCRIPTION 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 1/02-1/31/03 1/02-1/31/63 1/02-1/31/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 1/02-1/31/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/04-2/05/03 12/03-2/05/03 12/84-2/05/03 12/27-1/29/03 1/02-1/31/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27 1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 1/02-1/31/03 1/02-1/31/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 SALES TAX PAGE 10 AMOUNT 0.00 15.10 0.00 37.70 0.00 60.84 0.00 53.79 0.00 146.32 0.00 29.04 0,00 82.17 0.00 36.50 0.00 36.50 0.00 36.50 0.00 193.06 0.00 85.59 0.00 70.23 0.00 66.81 0.00 32.46 0.00 208.35 0.00 9.00 0.00 82.17 0.00 71.93 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.84 O.O0 155.30 0.00 305.07 0.00 18.44 0.00 94.12 0.00 9.00 0.00 117.00 0.00 336.37 0.00 17.10 0.00 9.09 0.00 24.44 0.00 27.34 0.00 30.76 0.00 30.76 0.00 109.49 0.00 104.25 0.00 58.06 0,00 66.71 0.00 172.53 0.00 65.10 0,00 60.00 0.00 205.08 0.00 109.74 0.00 9.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 154.54 0.00 68.50 O.O0 129.97 0.00 160.69 0.00 80.46 0.00 60.00 RUN DATE 02/13/03 TIME 14:29:15 - FINANCI;kL ACCOUNTING 02/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUNqD SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "02/10/2003" and "02/14/2003, FUND - 110 - GENEPJ%L FLTND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 1020 599198 02/14/03 625 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599199 02/14/03 258 1020 599200 02/14/03 2031 1020 599201 02/14/03 633 1020 599202 02/14/03 2736 1020 599203 02/14/03 1648 1020 599204 02/14/03 2397 1020 599205 02/14/03 M 1020 599206 02/14/03 2810 1020 599206 02/14/03 2810 1020 599206 02/14/03 2810 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599207 02/14/03 1299 1020 599208 02/14/03 2820 1020 599209 02/14/03 1011 1020 599210 02/14/03 1075 1020 599211 02/14/03 677 1020 599212 02/14/03 2492 1020 599213 02/14/03 688 1020 599214 02/14/03 2168 1020 599215 02/14/03 529 1020 599216 02/14/03 2873 1020 599216 02/14/03 2873 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FLrND/DEPT SAN JOSE WATER COMPkNY 1108314 SA/~ JOSE WATER COMP~u%~Y 1108407 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/~ 1108503 SAwN JOSE WATER COMP~/~Y 1108303 SA~ JOSE WATER COMPA/~Y 1108303 SAN JOSE WATER COMPASTY 1108303 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/~Y 5708510 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/qY 1108407 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 SANTA CI2%RA COUNTY 110 SANTA CI2%RA COUNTY CITIE 1101200 SANTA CL~ COUNTY SHERI 1102100 C3%ROL SATTERLEE 5806249 SAVIN CORPORATION (SUPPL 1104310 SAVIN CREDIT CORPORATION 1104310 S~AH, NAYANA 580 SFL~RT & FINAL 5806349 SFLART & FINltL 5806349 SFJ~RT & FINAL 5806349 S~LART AUTO GL~S 6308840 SPEEDEE TUNE A~ND SERVICE 6308840 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 110 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 1108005 STATE STREET BANK & TRUS 110 STONE, JACKIE 5606680 SULLIVAN A/TD MANN LURER 1108408 SUV~IT SUPPLY CORP OF CO 1108321 SLrNGA2~D PENTAMATION, INC 6104800 SUNNYVALE WINDUSTRIA~L 1108303 SUNNYVALE WINDUSTRIAL 1108303 DESCRIPTION ...... 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 12/27-1/29/03 V ORTEGA 563312780 RESERVATION D.KNAPP VILLLCO #ELF* SERVICE AGREEMEN~I FOR 2/13-9/12/03 H24008002 INS CHRGS Refund: Check - FALL. TEEN DA/qCE 17545 PA/~ENT/TOT SUP 23083 TEEN SUPPLIES 17209 WINDSHIELD RPL~SNT 8768 SMOG SERVICE BAR FILE JAN03 PREPAY~LENT H.WASTE JAN-DEC2002 *PERS DEF SUPPLIES LODGE POLE TREE STAKES 8" ACCESSIBLE TA~BLES T DATA LINE CHRGS JAxN03 SUPPLIES 13062 SUPPLIES 13063 SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 11 AMOUNT 60.00 60.00 85.59 73.63 61.69 60.00 60.00 295.53 37.70 61.69 6104.32 352.62 36.00 2419.67 75.00 156.99 72.67 138.34 114.32 264.33 394.88 26.96 587.00 3180.63 89.73 828.11 204.95 47.49 41.74 RUN DATE 02/13/03 TIME 14:29:16 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 02/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOL~NTING PERIOD: 8/03 C~ECK REGISTER - DISBDRSEMENT FLrND ICTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "02/10/2003" and "02/14/2003, ~ - 110 - GENER3%L FLrbTD C3%SH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT TOTAL CHECK 1020 599217 02/14/03 2045 SVCN 1104300 1020 599217 02/14/03 2045 SVCN 1104300 1020 599217 02/14/03 2045 SVCN 1104300 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599218 02/14/03 695 1020 599218 02/14/03 695 1020 599218 02/14/03 695 1020 599218 02/14/03 695 1020 599218 02/14/03 695 1020 599218 02/14/03 695 TOTAL CHECK SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606680 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606680 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 1020 599219 02/14/03 M Schultz, Seymour 550 1020 599220 02/14/03 696 T~dDCO SUPPLY 1020 599220 02/14/03 696 T~/DCO SUPPLY 1020 599220 02/14/03 696 TA/)CO SUPPLY 1020 599220 62/14/03 696 TADCO SUPPLY 10___20 599220 02/14/03 696 TADCO SUPPLY ~ 599220 02/14/03 696 T/~DCO SUPPLY 0 599220 02/14/03 696 TA/DCO SUPPLY TOTAL CHECK 1108321 1108501 1108315 1108303 1108302 1108314 1108312 1020 599221 02/14/03 701 TARGET STORES 1020 599221 02/14/03 701 TARGET STORES 1020 599221 02/14/03 701 TARGET STORES 1020 599221 02/14/03 701 TARGET STORES 1020 599221 02/14/03 701 TARGET STORES TOTAL CHECK 5706450 1106560 5806349 5706450 5706450 1020 599222 02/14/03 1993 TREASURER OF AJ~EDA COU 110 1020 599223 02/14/03 2665 ERIN TURI 5806249 1020 599224 02/14/03 1154 UNITED WAY OF S/~NTA CLAR 110 1020 599225 02/14/03 738 VALLEY OIL COMP~NY 6308840 1020 599226 02/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108102 1020 599226 02/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108602 1020 599226 02/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1107501 1020 599226 02/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1168505 1020 599226 02/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 5208003 1020 599226 02/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108501 1020 599226 02/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108005 1020 599226 02/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1101200 1020 599226 02/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 8104800 599226 02/14/03 310 VERIZON WIHELESS 1108504 DESCRIPTION ...... FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC SOCIALS SUPPLIES FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC BINGO COFFEE Refund: Check - Double FY 2002-2803 OPEN PUEC PARTS/SUPPLIES FY 2002-2003 OPEN PI/RC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUEC FY 2682-2003 OPEN PUEC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN P~/RC SUPPLIES 25310 SUPPLIES 16077 PRESCHOOL SUPPLY 23085 SUPPLIES 17014 SUPPLIES 25308 A LOPEZ JR 566398126 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR UNITED WAY FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUEC #408456999 JAN03 #408456999 JA/q03 #408456999 JD-N03 #408456999 JAN03 #408456999 J~N03 ~408456999 JAN03 #408456999 J~tN03 #408456999 JAN03 #408456999 JA~03 #408486999 J~N03 SALES TAX 0.00 0,00 O.O0 D.DO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.OO 0.00 O.O0 PAGE 12 AMOUNT 94 . 67 50.00 50.00 40.00 140.00 108.21 147.77 42.16 929.61 173.80 1469.72 100.00 96 . 84 107 . 90 96 . 84 96 . 84 96 .84 96 . 84 96 .84 688 . 94 39.40 113.58 35.76 181.50 49.30 419.54 253.84 1819.00 122.10 341.96 149.41 324.64 50.29 363.64 47.02 562.78 65.02 55.37 50.98 389.62 DATE 02/13/03 TIME 14:29:17 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 02/13/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/03 CNECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "02/10/2003" and "02/14/2003" FUND - 110 - GENEPJ%L FL~ND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FLrND/DEPT 1020 599226 02/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 5606620 1020 599226 02/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1107503 1020 599226 ' 02/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108201 1020 599226 02/14/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108503 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599227 02/14/03 746 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 5506549 1020 599228 02/14/03 745 VMI INC 1103501 1020 599229 02/14/03 M2003 WASTE NEWS 5208003 1020 599230 02/14/03 2745 DORIS WILLIAMS 5506549 1028 599231 02/14/03 794 XEROX CORPOP~TION 1104310 1020 599232 02/14/03 M YEONG, SIMON 580 1020 599233 02/14/03 M ZAIT, KONSTANCE 580 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL FLeD TOTAL REPORT DESCRIPTION ...... #408456999 JA-N03 #408456999 JA-N03 #408456999 JAN03 #408456999 JA-N03 OFFICE SUPPLIES 16078 RENT,fL OF EQpMNT 16460 WASTE NEWS 2YR SUBSCRP SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC Refund: Check - Return REFD #151692 CK LOST SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 13 AMOUNT 94.05 318.77 454.02 99.33 3024 . 93 94.48 167.79 78. O0 60.00 387. O0 600.00 25316 253161.91 RUN DATE 02/13/03 TIME 14:29:17 - FINA/~CI~tL ACCOUNTING DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 03-041 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING FEBRUARY 21, 2003 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Director- of Adm~-nistra{ive Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 3rd day of lqarch _, 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 02/21/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUbFfING PERIOD: 8/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FU/~D SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "02/17/2003" and "02/21/2003" CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT ............ VE~rDOR ............ FUND/DEPT 1020 597351 V 11/15/02 M JOSHI, SAVITA 580 1020 599234 02/21/03 1695 3M 2708405 1020 599235 02/21/03 2877 A-1 NORCAL & SONS 4239222 1020 599236 02/21/03 2850 ABLE SEPTIC TA~NK SERV 1108401 1020 599237 02/21/03 2825 ACADEMIC CHESS 5806349 1020 599238 02/21/03 2539 ACS STATE & LOCAL SOLUTI 1102101 1020 599239 02/21/03 M2003 AIA SANTA CI~ VALLEY 1106001 1020 599240 02/21/03 2566 TOM AID~-LA 4239222 1020 599241 02/21/03 29 LYI~NE DIANE AITKEN 5806449 1020 599242 02/21/03 2636 A24ERICA/~ PUBLIC WORKSAS 1108102 1020 599243 02/21/03 M A~RIDOMI, Y~3MIKO 580 1020 599244 02/21/03 2889 BAY CONSTRUCTION INC 4209108 1020 599245 02/21/03 91 DH JOEL BERGER 5806449 1020 599246 02/21/03 2642 BUILDERS BOOKSOI/RCE 1108001 1020 599247 02/21/03 127 THE CALIFORNIA CH/~EL 1103500 1020 599248 02/21/03 1460 TONI CARREIRO 5606620 1020 599249 02/21/03 149 CASH 1104400 1020 599249 02/21/03 149 CASH 2204010 1020 599249 02/21/03 149 CASH 1101000 1020 599249 02/21/03 149 CASH 2308004 1020 599249 02/21/03 149 C~%SH 1104510 1020 599249 02/21/03 149 CASH 1101201 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599250 02/21/03 2626 CHA/qG, CHENoYA 1103300 1020 599251 02/21/03 2769 CHARLES M SALTER ASSOCIA 4239222 1020 599251 02/21/03 2769 C~LARLES M SALTER ASSOCIA 4239222 1020 599251 02/21/03 2769 CHARLES M SALTER ASSOCIA 4239222 1020 599251 02/21/03 2769 CH3%RLES M SALTER ASSOCIA 4239222 TOT;fL CHECK 1020 599252 02/21/03 2871 JACKSON CHOW 5806349 1020 599253 02/21/03 192 CMC OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 5806449 PAGE 1 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAxX A2~OL~T Refund: Check - FALL P 0.00 -34.00 TPM-5 PROTECTIVE OVERL 0.00 107.36 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 5200.00 STORM DP~IN MAINTEN~2~C 0.00 4152.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 8960.00 RLC CITATIONS JAN2003 0.00 10138.00 H3~BOOKS 0.00 29.72 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 1300.04 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 286.00 IN~ODUCTION TO CONSTR 0.00 595.00 Refund: Check - WINTER 0.00 169.00 PLrBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 2391 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 90.00 2001 CA BLDG CODE 0.00 390.79 PROGR3~ING FEB2003 0.00 253.34 WEB SITE CHANGES 0.00 435.50 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/19 0.00 39.95 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/19 0.00 48.28 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/19 0.00 20.15 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/19 0.00 22.00 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/19 0.00 10.40 PETTY CASH 2/03-2/19 0.00 59.03 0.00 199.81 NEWSPAPER CLIP SERV 0.00 200.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 9928.35 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 9591.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 10072.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 12407.33 0.00 41999.28 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 6006.67 TL~BERCULOSIS/ROBINSON 0.00 DATE 02/21/03 TIME 07:58:18 - FINANCI~dL ACCOUNTING ACCOIRgTING PERIOD: ~CTION CRITERIA: 8/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FLrND transact.trans_date between "02/17/2003" and "02/21/2003" FIIND - 110 - GENERAL FUA~D C-~SR ACCT CHECK NO 1020 599254 1020 599255 1020 599256 1020 599257 1020 599257 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599258 1020 599259 1020 599260 1020 599261 1020 599262 1020 599263 J 599264 1020 599264 1020 599264 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599265 1020 599266 1020 599266 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599267 1020 599268 1020 599269 1020 599270 1020 599270 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599271 1020 599272 1020 599273 599274 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 02/21/03 1753 02/21/03 187 02/21/03 191 02/21/03 1579 02/21/03 1579 COACH HOUSE LIQUORS 5606680 MJ%RY J CP~AWFORD 5806349 CUPERTINO CM3%MBER OF COM 1101000 CUPERTINO LOC N 5TOR LLC 1108501 CUPERTINO LOC-N-STOR LLC 1108503 02/21/03 2866 02/21/03 1492 02/21/03 1242 02/21/03 2664 02/21/03 249 02/21/03 250 02/21/03 253 02/21/03 253 02/21/03 253 D.R.ELROD AkrD ASSOCIATES 1107405 DENCO S~LES COMP~kNY 2708405 DIGITAL PRINT IMPRESSION 1104310 KATRLEEN DIYTRA 5806449 ESBRO CHEMICAL 5606620 EUPHRAT MUSEUM OF ART 5806349 EXCNJkNGE LINEN SERVICE 5606620 EXCHANGE LINEN SERVICE 5606680 EXCHANGE LINEN SERVICE 1106265 02/21/03 2785 02/21/03 298 02/21/03 298 GP~ADE TECH INC 4209116 GRAINGER INC 4239222 GP~AINGER INC 4239222 02/21/03 1766 02/21/03 M 02/21/03 315 02/21/03 2746 02/21/03 2748 GR3{NITE ROCK COMP~kNY 2708404 Getz, Betty 550 JILL MAFF 5806449 GLENN A PL~NSEN 1102101 GLENN A }L~NSEN 1102101 02/21/03 2522 02/21/03 2868 02/21/03 341 02/21/03 2872 LYSfN HELLER 5506549 HILL ASSOCIATES 5609112 ICE CENTER OF CUPERTINO 5806349 IES L~NGUAGE FOLRgDATION 5806349 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX P~CE 2 ~OUNT SUPPLIES 0.00 731.98 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 1036.76 M.CM3%NG 2003 S.AWARDS 0.00 85.00 #G-34 ~Q%RCH 2003 0.00 217.00 #G-33 5QkRCH 2003 0.00 217.00 0.00 434.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 3246.14 REPAIRS 8763 0.00 100.41 LETTERHEAD ENVELOPES i 0.00 3964.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 312.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PI/RC 0.00 298.44 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 5091.34 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PLYRC, 0.00 20.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 20.00 SPECIAL EVENT 0.00 135.20 0.00 175.20 PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT 0.00 48088.22 PARTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 52.33 P~kRTS/SUPPLIES 0.00 1712,73 0~00 1765.06 SUPPLIES 8762 0.00 527.72 Refund: Check - change 0.00 425.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 390.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0,00 2075.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 9188.19 0.00 11263.19 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 420.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 3453.24 SKATING 2/19 17529 0,00 224.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0,00 3210.00 RI/N DATE 02/21/03 TIME 07:58:19 - FIN~-NCIAL ACCOUNTING 02/21/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/03 CHECK REGISTER ~ DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "02/17/2003" and "02/21/2003" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FLrND CASH ACCT CRECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FLrND/DEPT 1020 599275 02/21/03 347 1020 599276 02/21/03 2374 1020 599277 02/21/03 2285 1020 599277 02/21/08 2285 TOTJkL CHECK 1020 599278 02/21/03 1062 1020 599279 02/21/03 2355 1020 599280 02/21/03 372 1020 599281 02/21/03 1237 1020 599282 02/21/03 ME2003 1020 599283 02/21/03 2300 1020 599284 02/21/03 2514 1020 599285 02/21/03 M2003 1020 599286 02/21/03 1463 1020 599287 02/21/03 2713 1020 599288 02/21/03 2157 1020 599289 02/21/03 M 1020 599290 02/21/03 480 1020 599291 02/21/03 M 1020 599292 02/21/03 489 1020 599293 02/21/03 493 1020 599293 02/21/03 493 1020 599293 02/21/03 493 1020 599293 02/21/03 493 1020 599293 02/21/03 493 1020 599298 02/21/03 493 1020 599293 02/21/03 ~93 1020 599293 02/21/03 493 1020 599293 02/21/03 493 1020 599293 02/21/03 493 TOTAL CHECK INDUSTRIAL WIPER 6308840 JII PROMOTIONS, INC. 4239222 KATHRYN KELLY JOESTEN 1106500 KATHRYN KELLY JOESTEN 1106265 KAYE-SMITH 1104530 KIMLEY MORN ~ ASSOCIAT 4209534 KINKO'S INC 1108601 PATRICK KWOK 1101000 LAURA MIYAF~WA 1104510 BARBARA LAUX 5506549 LOS ALTOS GDARBAGE 1106248 M. BEVER COMPANY 5506549 MA3%CO AUTO PAINTING & BO 6308840 REBECCA MCCOP~ICK 5806449 SUMAKO MINATO 5806349 Monson, Elsie 550 NELSEN ENGINEERING 2159620 NISNI~FJRA, DIANE 580 NOTEWORTHY MUSIC SCEOOL 5806349 OFFICE DEPOT 1107405 OFFICE DEPOT 1104400 OFFICE DEPOT 5806349 OFFICE DEPOT 1104000 OFFICE DEPOT 5806249 OFFICE DEPOT 1108101 OFFICE DEPOT 1106200 OFFICE DEPOT 5806249 OFFICE DEPOT 5806249 OFFICE DEPOT 1104400 DESCRIPTION ...... SUPPLIES 8782 PAPERWEIGHTS SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR PARKING CITATIONS STAR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT REPRODUCTION OF 30 COP AIRFARE/ONTARIO,CA BAGELS & SUPPLIES SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR DEBRIS BOX 8 DAYS R3%MP CONSTR FOR STANK COMPLETE REPAIR AATD PA SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR Refund: Check - change OP~ANGE/BYRNE DRAINAGE Refund: Check - SPRING SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.O0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 3 AMOUNT 179.89 3066.58 33.31 141.69 175.00 645.53 881.96 2652.20 208.50 64.98 560.00 440.16 20, 769.67 288.00 250.00 425.00 24800.00 70.20 4004.84 129.87 23.79 86.32 43.53 158.55 38.37 59.92 351.53 16.01 46.47 954.36 RUN DATE 02/21/03 TIME 07:58:19 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING r 02/21/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND ~CTION URITERIA: transact.~rans_daLe between ,02/17/2003" and "02/21/2003" FUND - 110 - GENEPJkL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 599294 02/21/03 507 DAN OSBORNE DBA:OSBORNE 4209216 1020 599294 02/21/03 507 DDlq OSBORNE DBA:OSBORNE 1108503 1020 599294 02/21/03_507 DA~ OSBORNE DBA:OSBOP. NE 1108503 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 6104800 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 6104800 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1101500 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108504 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1101500 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 5606620 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108504 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108505 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 5708510 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108503 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 5708510 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 1020 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108503 ~ 599295 02/21/03 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108505 AL CHECK 1020 599296 02/21/03 511 PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM 1108501 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 1020 599297 02/21/03 513 TOTAL CHECK PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108507 1108506 1108505 1108407 1108315 1108314 1108312 1108303 1108501 1108504 1108503 5708510 5606640 5606620 1108830 1108602 1108511 1020 599298 02/21/03 526 1020 599298 02/21/03 526 TOTAL CHECK PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGIN 4239222 PENINSLrLA DIGITAL IMAGIN 1108101 599299 02/21/03 1392 PINE PRESS 5609112 DESCRIPTION TIME/MATERIALS TIME/MATERIALS TIME/MATERIALS 2/07-3/06 1/13-2/28 1/13-2/12 1/28-2/27 2/07-3/06 2/07-3/06 2/07-3/06 2/07-3/06 2/07-3/06 2/07-3/06 2/07-3/06 2/07-3/06 2/07-3/06 2/07-3/06 2/07-3/06 2/07-3/06 2/07-3/06 2/07-3/06 PAGE 4 SALES T~2( AMOUNT 0.00 1316.67 0.08 212.89 0.00 1639.56 0.00 255.24 0.00 889.25 0.00 299.D0 0.00 63.89 0.00 240.88 0.00 481.74 0.00 54.23 0.00 87.88 0.00 87.89 0.00 87.88 0.00 87.88 0.00 87.88 0.00 87.89 0.00 87.89 0.00 240.88 0.00 240.88 0.00 240.88 0.00 240.88 0.00 3862.94 #252-2405 1/15-2/14 0.00 16.01 DEC/JAN 2003 CHRGS DEC/JAN 2003 CHRGS DEC/JAN 2003 CHRGS DEC/JAN 2003 CHRGS DEC/J/~N 2003 CHRGS DEC/JAN 2003 CHRCS DEC/JAN 2003 CHRGS DEC/JAN 2003 UNRGS DEC/JAN 2003 CHRGS DEC/JAN 2003 CHRGS DEC/JAN 2003 CHRGS DEC/JAN 2003 CHRGS DEC/JAN 2003 CHRGS DEC/JAN 2003 CHRGS DEC/JAN 2003 CHRGS DEC/JAN 2003 CHRGS DEC/JAN 2003 CHRGS CIVIC CNTR/LIBRARY C.HALL FLOOR PLANS BAIFNER/S.CREEK CORRIDO 0.00 226.49 0.00 2347.24 0.00 695.00 0.00 342.14 0.00 387.57 0.00 233.94 0.00 55.78 0.00 4509.10 0.00 4356.23 0.00 2012.84 0.00 3961.04 0.00 163.77 0.00 1300.92 0.00 16.80 0.00 2381.91 0.00 341.04 0.00 24243.93 0.00 135.25 0.00 21.43 0.00 156.68 0.00 1672.46 RUN DATE 02/21/03 TIME 07:58:20 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 02/21/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 8/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FI/ND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "02/17/2003" and "02/21/2003,, FI/ND - 110 - GENERAL FLrND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 599300 02/21/03 545 1020 599301 02/21/03 2890 1020 599302 02/21/03 621 1020 599303 02/21/03 628 1020 599304 02/21/03 1919 1020 599305 02/21/03 639 1020 589306 02/21/03 M 1020 599307 02/21/03 647 1020 599308 02/21/03 1799 1020 599309 02/21/03 M 1020 599310 02/21/03 652 1020 599310 02/21/03 652 1020 599310 02/21/03 652 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599311 02/21/03 2415 1020 599311 02/21/03 2415 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599312 02/21/03 M2003 1020 599313 02/21/03 681 1020 599314 02/21/03 684 1020 599315 02/21/03 2045 1020 599316 02/21/03 695 1020 599317 02/21/03 M2003 1020 599318 02/21/03 708 1020 599319 02/21/03 709 1020 599320 02/21/03 648 1020 599320 02/21/03 648 1020 599320 02/21/03 648 TOTAL CHECK JEFF PISERCHIO 5606640 REALFACTS 1107405 SAN JOSE MERCI/RY CI~SIF 1108601 SA/~TA CLAR3% COUNTY SHERI 1102100 SANTA CI~ VALLEY TP~ANS 5500000 SAVIN CORPOPdkTION (COPIE 1104310 SAVITA JOSHI 580 ELIZABETH SH/~NNON 5806449 SHIELDS, HARPER & CO. 6308840 SHIN, YOUNG ME 580 SIERP~A SPRINGS WATER CO. 5806449 SIERRA SPRINGS WATER CO. 1101500 SIERRA SPRINGS WATER CO. 1106265 SIMON M~RTIN-VEGUN WINKE 4239222 SIMON M~TIN-VEGUE WINKE 4239222 STATE WATER RESOURCES 4239222 CONNIE BAI~DA STEVENS 5806449 CHERYL STODDARD 5806449 SVCN 5609112 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 THE LAW.NET CORPOP~ATION 1101500 NANCY THOMPSON 5806449 LOU THLTR~L~/q 5806449 TMT ENTERPRISES, INC. 1108312 TMT ENTERPRISES, INC. 1108314 TMT ENTERPRISES, INC. 1108315 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... BHF GOLF CONCESSIONAIR M~KET OVERVIEWS BICYCLE FOOTBRIDGE L~W ENFORCEMENT FEB 20 TICKETS/PASSES FEB2003 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC R#176582 CK LOST IN MA SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE CALL 8780 Refund: Check - SPRING FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC BOTTLED WATER FY 2002-2003 OPEN pLTRC P~TBLIC WORKS CONTPJ~CT PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT NOTICE OF INTENT SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR DISPI~Y AD SENIOR SOCIALS LAW.NET ;%N~AL SUESCRI SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR CA/qDLESTICK BALLFIELD CANDLESTICK BALLFIELD CANDLESTICK BALLFIELD SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 5 AMOUNT 1899.00 300.00 1584.00 480787.17 330.00 194.86 34.00 598.00 293.00 182.00 88.90 148728.71 1990.00 150718.71 700.00 450.00 357 50 172.00 314.55 575.00 312.00 1548.00 122.61 122.60 122.60 367.81 RUN DATE 02/21/03 TIME 07:58:21 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 02/21/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOL~ING PERIOD: 8/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBLrRSEMENT FLrND ~CTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "02/17/2003" and "02/21/2003" FI/ND - 110 - GENEPJkL FUND CA, SM ACCT CHECK NO 1020 599321 1020 599322 1020 599322 TOTAL CHECK 1020 599323 t020 599324 1020 599325 1020 599326 1020 599327 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FU~/DEPT 02/21/03 1905 TRAFFIC SAFETY CORP 2709447 02/21/03 M2003 TRAFFIC SIGNAL ASSOCIATI 1108602 02/21/03 M2003 TRAFFIC SIGNAL ASSOCIATI 1108601 02/21/03 2781 AL TSUGAWA 1104400 02/21/03 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108501 02/21/03 742 COSETTE VIAUD 5806349 02/21/03 2456 WORLD JOURNAL 5506549 02/21/03 2561 WORLD POINT ECC, INC. 1104400 ..... DESCRIPTION M~y AVE GATEWAY FLIGH 2 MEMBERS $25 EA 2 ME~tBERS $25 EA SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR #308957246 JAN2083 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR RENEWAL BOOKLETS 17441 SALES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 6 AMOUNT 5394.44 50.00 50.00 100.00 400.00 42.46 1523.80 196.30 176 . 13 911501 · 04 RUN DATE 02/21/03 TIME 07:58:21 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING RES OLUTION NUMBER 03-0 ~ 2 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR SALARIES AND WAGES PAID ON February 28, 2003 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services, or their designated representative has certified to the accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law; NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds set forth: GROSS PAYROLL Less Employee Deductions NET PAYROLL $ 417,779.77 $(118,809.90) $ 298.969.87 Payroll check numbers issued 66049 throUgh 66284 Void check number(s) Director of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 3rd day of March 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF CUPEI(TINO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3210 FAX: (408) 777-3366 Website: www.cupertino.org PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Agenda Item Number Agenda Date: March 3, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Approve a fee waiver request in the approximate amount of $402.00 for the Homestead' High School Music Boosters' May 9, 2003, annual music awards banquet at the Quinlan Center. Copy of the letter is attached. BACKGROUND The Homestead High School Music Boosters is a Cupertino non-profit organization involved in raising funds to assist high school students in their pursuit of music education. The schools do not have sufficient funding to provide extras, so they rely on organizations such as the Music Boosters for things such as paying for equipment, paying for additional music instructors, purchasing uniforms, and providing scholarships. The music awards banquet is held each spring to honor those Homestead High School students who have participated in band, orchestra, and color guard. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council waive the room rental fees in the approximate amount of $402.00 for the Homestead High School Music Boosters on Friday, May 9. The Boosters will be responsible for $48 in staff costs. SUBMITTED BY: Therese Ambrosi Smith, Director Parks and Recreation Department APPROVED FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY COUNCIL: David Knapp, City Manager PrintedonRecycledPaper Homestead High School Music Boosters 21370 Homestead Road Cupertino, CA 95014 February 7, 2003 Honorable Michael Chang Mayor of Cupertino City of Cupertino, City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Dear Mayor Chang, On Friday, May 9, 2003, the Homestead High School Music Boosters will once again host our annual music awards banquet in the Cupertino Room at Quinlan Community Center. This dinner is held each spring to honor the Homestead High School students who have participated in band, orcheslra, choir, and colorguard. The Homestead High School Music Boosters is organized exclusively for the purpose of supporting, encouraging, and promoting the activities of the Homestead High School music program. Although many of the music program activities are student-funded, our organization must raise funds to pay for many of the extras that allow the music program to flourish. Booster funded expenses include, but are not limited to, purchasing equipment for marching band field shows, paying for additional music instructors, purchasing uniforms, providing scholarships, and purchasing musical equipment. As you know, the schools do not have sufficient funding to provide for these extras, so they rely on organizations such as the Music Boosters to raise additional money to enrich the program. The Homestead High School Music Boosters feel the people in the Cupertino community benefit from its endeavors in many ways, particularly because the additional funds open the door for all students at Homestead High School to have an opportunity to participate in a high-quality music program as part of their educational career. Because the Homestead High School Music Boosters is a Cupertino non-profit organization involved in raising funds to assist high school students in their pursuit of music education, our organization is requesting a fee waiver for our event on May 9, 2003. The Cupertino Room has been the perfect place for our previous awards dinners. We appreciate the generosity of the city of Cupertino for waiving the fees in the past, which allowed us to make this a more affordable evening for our booster families. Thank you very much for considering this request. Please send your response to: Vicki Feltman, 1150 W. Knickerbocker Dr., Sunnyvale, CA 94087. Sincerely, Vicki Feltman Music Awards Banquet Coordinator, 2002-2003 CC: Therese Smith, Director of Parks & Recreation Homestead High School Music Boosters 21370 Homestead Road Cupertino, CA 95014 February 7, 2003 Honorable Michael Chang Mayor of Cupertino City of Cupertino, City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Dear Mayor Chang, On Friday, May 9, 2003, the Homestead High School Music Boosters will once again host our annual music awards banquet in the Cupertino Room at Quinlan Community Center. This dinner is held each spring to honor the Homestead High School students who have participated in band, orchestra, choir, and colorguard. The Homestead High School Music Boosters is organized exclusively for the purpose of supporting, encouraging, and promoting the activities of the Homestead High School music program. Although many of the music program activities are student-funded, our organization must raise funds to pay for many of the extras that allow the music program to flourish. Booster funded expenses include, but are not limited to, purchasing equipment for marching band field shows, paying for additional music instructors, purchasing uniforms, providing scholarships, and purchasing musical equipment. As you know, the schools do not have sufficient funding to provide for these extras, so they rely on organizations such as the Music Boosters to raise additional money to enrich the program. The Homestead High School Music Boosters feel the people in the Cupertino community benefit from its endeavors in many ways, particularly because the additional funds open the door for all students at Homestead High School to have an opportunity to participate in a high-quality music program as part of their educational career. Because the Homestead High School Music Boosters is a Cupertino non-profit organization involved in raising funds to assist high school students in their pursuit of music education, our organization is requesting a fee waiver for our event on May 9, 2003. The Cupertino Room has been the perfect place for our previous awards dinners. We appreciate the generosity of the city of Cupertino for waiving the fees in the past, which allowed us to make this a more affordable evening for our booster families. Thank you very much for considering this request. Please send your response to: Vicki Feltman, 1150 W. Knickerbocker Dr., Sunnyvale, CA 94087. Sincerely, Vicki Feltman Music Awards Banquet Coordinator, 2002-2003 CC: Therese Smith, Director of Parks & Recreation _ II~ CITY OF cuPe nno City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-32110 FAX: (408) 777-3366 Website: www.cupertino.org PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Agenda Item Number Agenda Date: March 3, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Approve a fee waiver request in the approximate amount of $628.00 for the Organization of Special Needs Families' (OSF) March 23, 2003, first annual event recognizing the organizations achievements. Copy of request is attached. BACKGROUND The OSF is a Cupertino-based, nonprofit organization that incorporates both educational and recreational activities for children with special needs every Saturday. This organization provides support, resources, and weekly activities to families with special needs children. OSF also trains local volunteer community members to work as one-on-one helpers. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council waive the room rental fees in the approximate amount of $628.00 for OSF's event. OSF will be responsible for $72.00 in staff costs. SUBMITTED BY: The e~se~Ambrosi Smith, Director Parks and Recreation APPROVED FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY COUNCIL: David W. Knapp, City Manager mp Pnnted on Recycled Paper Organization of Special Needs Families 10823 Willowbrook Way, Cupertino, CA 95014 Tel: (408) 996-0858 www.osfamilies.org February 12, 2002 Cupertino City Council 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Ref: Appeal for facility rental waiver · Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council, The Organization of Special Needs Families (OSF), a non-profit organization, based at 20920 McClellan Road, Cupertino, CA. 95014, runs a weekly program, which incorporates both educational and recreational activities for children with special needs every Saturday from l-5pm. All enrolled children with special needs are grouped by age and rotate through four stations, which include Fine/Gross Motor Play Station, Reading and Music Station, Computer and Tahlework Station, and Physical Exercise Station. OSF provides support, resources and weekly activities to families with special needs children. Currently enrollment is 28 students with special needs whose ages range from 3 to 45. OSF also has trained local community members, most of them local high school students, to work as one- on-one helpers. Helpers receive training, which covers basic concepts of special education and techniques of applied behavior analysis. Volunteers who work with children of special needs are committed, caring individuals drawn by the intrinsic rewards of working with this uniqu,e population. While we are proceeding ahead, we are planning our first annual meeting where all participants would have the opportunity to invite our friends to share in the achievements and joy. The party is schedt~led fo_r March 23, 2003 from 5pm - 1 Opm at Quinlan Center of Cup~rti.n_o Room & ' Social Room where the Cupertino Room can host the meeting while the Social Room provid~- programs for children. 7o0 I would like to ask your kindness to waive this $~ facility usage to support OSF, a Cupertino-based non-profit organization. Most of our families, like me as Cupertino residents, will appreciate your generous support. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.  ~y Yours, President Organization of Special Needs Families 10823 Willowbrook Way, Cupertino, CA 95014 Tel: (408) 996-0858 www.osfamilies.org February 12, 2002 Cupertino City Council 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Ref: Appeal for facility rental waiver Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council, The Organization of Special Needs Families (OSF), a non-profit organization, based at 20920 McClellan Road, Cupertino, CA. 95014, runs a weekly program, which incorporates both educational and recreational activities for children with special needs every Saturday from 1-5pm. All enrolled children with special needs are grouped by age and rotate through four stations, which include Fine/Gross Motor Play Station, Reading and Music Station, Computer and Tablework Station, and Physical Exercise Station. OSF provides support, resources and weekly activities to families with special needs children. Currently enrollment is 28 students with special needs whose ages range from 3 to 45. OSF also has trained local community members, most of them local high school students, to work as one- on-one helpers. Helpers receive training, which covers basic concepts of special education and techniques of applied behavior analysis. Volunteers who work with children of special needs are committed, caring individuals drawn by the intrinsic rewards of working with this unique population. While we are proceeding ahead, we are planning our first annual meeting where all participants would have the opportunity to invite our friends to share in the achievements and joy. The party is scheduled for March 23, 2003 from 5pm - 1 Opm at Quinlan Center of Cupertino Room & Social Room where the Cupertino Room can host the meeting while the Social Room provides programs for children. ~ '7o0, ~ I would like to ask your kindness to waive this $7-000:00 facility usage to support OSF, a Cupertino-based non-profit organization. Most of our families, like me as Cupertino residents, will appreciate your generous support. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.  ~y Yours, President RESOLUTION NO. 03-043 DRAF]' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCEPTING QUITCLAIM DEED AND AUTHORIZATION FOR UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS FROM CHAO-YUE LIU AND DAPHNE W. CHEN, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS, 21831 SAN FERNANDO AVENUE, APN 357-15-039 WHEREAS, Chao-Yue Liu and Daphne W. Chen, Husband and Wife, as Joint Tenants have executed a "Quitclaim Deed and Authorization", which is in good and sufficient form, quitclaiming all their rights in and authorizing the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, to extract water from the underground basin, underlying that certain real property situate in the City of Cupertino, more particularly described as follows: All that certain real property situate in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, as shown and delineated on the attached Exhibits "A" and "B". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Cupertino accept said "Quitclaim Deed and Authorization" so tendered; and IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to record said "Quitclaim Deed and Authorization" and this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 3rd day of March 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION OF LAND FOR QUITCLAIM DEED FOR UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO, CA. Ail that certain real property situated in the City of Cuper- tino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, being the Easterly 50 feet of Section tll of "Map of Subdivision 'A' Monta Vista" which Map was recorded on April 11, 1917 in Book (Volume) "P" of Maps at page 20, Santa Clara County Records, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Section 111 on the northerly line of San Fernando Avenue, 40 feet wide; Thence along said line, West 50.00 feet; Thence leaving said line, North 198.42 feet to the northerly ine of said Section; Thence along said line, East 50.00 feet to the northeasterly corner thereof; Thence along the easterly line thereof, South 198.42 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 0.228 of an acre, more or less. Refer to EXHIBIT "B", PLAT, which is hereby made a part of this description. Date: Jan. 15, 2003 APN: 357-1~-039 Address: 21831 San Fernando Ave., Cupetino, CA ~ SAki 50.06 _ ~-- F E~ lqANDO A VF. PLAT OF ~UITCLJ~IIV~ DEED TO:C l T ~ dF CUP ~ P Tl~ O, JA~ I~ 200 bI "= ~0 ' ~1,~51 $'A~q F£RIVAtqDO AVF-. RESOLUTION NO. 03-044 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES FROM CHAO-YUE LIU AND DAPHNE W. CHEN, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS, 21831 SAN FERNANDO AVENUE, APN 357-15-039 WHEREAS, Chao-Yue Liu and Daphne W. Chen, Husband and Wife, as Joint Tenants, have executed a Grant of Easement for Roadway Purposes which is in good and sufficient form, granting to the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, easement over certain real property for roadway purposes, situate in the City of Cupertino, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof, which is as follows: All that certain real property situate in the City of Cupertino, County of Smata Clara, State of California, located at 21831 San Fernando Avenue, APN 357-15-039. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Cupertino accept said grant so tendered; and IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to record said grant and this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 3rd day of March 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION Ail that certain real property situated in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, being the southerly 5.00 feet of the easterly 50 feet of Section 111, as shown upon "Map of Subdivision 'A', Monta Vista" recorded April 1t, 1917, in Bookd "P" of Maps at page 20, Santa Clara County Records, described as follows: Beginning at the southeasterly corner of said Section 111 on the northerly line of San Fernando Avenue, 40 feet wide; Thence along said line, West 50.00 feet; Thence leaving said line, North 5.00 feet; Thence parallel with the centerline of said San Fernando Avenue and distant therefrom 25.00 feet, right angle measure, East 50.00 feet to the easterly line of said Section 111; Thence along said line, South 5.00 feet to the point of beginning; containing 250 square feet, more or less. Refer to EXHIBIT "B", PLAT, which is hereby made a part of this description. Date: Jan. 15, 2003 APN: 357-15-039 Address: ~2t~31 San Fernando Ave., Cupertino 0 ~-P£D) CATIO Al 5/~t4 FF_.R___~/k~O0 AVE. EXH I ZED/CAT/oM PLAT CIT~ O~ EUDE~TINO, cA. DA 75: JAW Iff, 200 3 d~L~, I"= 30' RESOLUTION NO. 03-045 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND DEVELOPERS, CHAO-YUE LIU AND DAPHNE W. CHEN, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS, 21831 SAN FERNANDO AVENUE, APN 357-15-039 WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City Council a proposed improvement agreement between the City of Cupertino and developer, Chao-Yue Liu and Daphne W. Chen, Husband and Wife, as Joint Tenants, for the installation of certain municipal improvements at 21831 San Fernando Avenue and said agreement having been approved by the City Attorney, and Developers having paid the fees as outlined in the attached Exhibit A; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Mayor and the City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign the aforementioned agreement on behalf of the City of Cupertino. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 3rd day of March 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino Resolution No. 03-045 Page 2 EXHIBIT "A" SCHEDULE OF BOND, FEES, AND DEPOSITS DEVELOPMENT: Chao-Yue Liu and Daphne W. Chen, Husband and Wife, as Joint Tenants LOCATION: 21831 San Fernando Avenue, APN 357-15-039 A. Faithful Performance Bond: Off-site: TWELVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS B. Labor and Material Bond: TWELVE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS C. Checking and Inspection Fees: TWO THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS D. Development Maintenance Deposit ONE THOUSAND AND 00/I 00 DOLLARS E. Storm Drainage Fee: TWO HUNDRED EIGHTY-SIX AND 40/100 DOLLARS G. H. I. J. K. One Year Power Cost: Street Trees: Map Checking Fee: Park Fee: Water Main Reimbursement: Maps and/or Improvement Plans: $ 12,500.00 $12,500.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 286.40 N/A By Developer N/A N/A N/A As specified in Item #21 of agreement CITY OF cuPeP no City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX (408) 777-3333 AGENDA ITEM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Summary AGENDA DATE March 3, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to apply for, accept, and appropriate $600,000 in FY 2003-04 funding from the State Bicycle Transportation Account for the Mary Avenue Footbridge Improvement Project. BACKGROUND In November 2002, staff submitted an application to Caltrans' Department of Local Assistance for a Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) grant in the amount of $600,000. If approved, this application would assist the City of Cupertino in financing the Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge project by comprising a portion of the required local match funding for the project. The Department of Local Assistance has requested that the grant application be supplemented by a confirmation by Council, in the form of the accompanying resolution, of the City's commitment to this project. The total cost of the Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge is estimated to be $6,800,000. This represents a project whose scope has been greatly augmented by comprehensive aesthetic and neighborhood buffering features resulting from an extensive community input process. Embracing the enhanced project enthusiastically, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) has committed 80%, or $5,440,000, of the funding necessary for the project. In accepting the VTA funding commitment, the City, in turn, committed itself to the task of assembling the remaining 20%, or $1,360,000, as the project local share. State Senator Byron Sher's office aided the City's effort to raise these funds by successfully including $500,000 of Local Assistance Special Project monies in the 2000 State budget resolution. In addition, the City of Sunnyvale has approved a contribution of $110,000 of the local share. The City of Cupertino itself has budgeted $400,000 toward the local share. This leaves $350,000 of the local share yet to be committed. Approval of the City's BTA grant application would more than cover the uncommitted portion of the local share. FISCAL IMPACT The BTA grant, if approved, will have the potential to offset some of the City of Cupertino's General Fund contribution to the project, as well as unanticipated contingent costs associated Printed on Recycled Paper J l ~ l with bringing this project to completion. Although the BTA grant requires a 10% local match, the prospective net gain for the local share of the VTA grant will be up to $540,000. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 03- ~) ~] {0 _, authorizing the City Manager to apply for, accept, and appropriate $600,000 in FY 2003-04 funding from the State Bicycle Transportation Account for the Mary Avenue Footbridge Improvement Project. Submitted by: Ralph A. Quails, Jr. Director of Public Works App~submission: David W. Knapp City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 03-046 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPLY FOR, ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE $600,000 1N FY 2003-04 FUNDING FROM THE STATE BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNT FOR THE MARY AVENUE FOOTBRIDGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the State Department of Transportation Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) annually disburses funding to eligible jurisdictions for projects that improve safety and convenience for bicycle commuters; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino desires to apply for, accept and appropriate up to $600,000 in funding from BTA for fiscal year 2003-04 for the purpose of appropriating said funding to Public Works Department to implement a class II commute bikeway; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino will provide the required 10 percent local match for the BTA funds;, and WHEREAS, said funding will allow the City to construct a bicycle and pedestrian footbridge to connect existing bicycle lanes over State Freeway 280 that will create a bicycle conmmter corridor. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby authorizes the City Manager to apply, accept and appropriate of FY 2003-2004 BTA funds in the amount of $600,000 to design and construct the Mary Avenue Footbridge; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager, or his designee, is authorized, on behalf of the City of'Cupertino, to execute and submit all documents, payment requests, and related actions, as well as, to appropriate any additional funds received for the completion of the project; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that should additional funds be received for this project, the City Manager, or his designee, is hereby authorized to accept and appropriate the same for the purposes described above. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 3rd day of March, 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF CUPE INO City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX ............ AGENDA ITEM /°-i`, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Summary AGENDA DATE March 3~ 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Authorization for the City Manager to Negotiate and Execute a reimbursement agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Water District in the amount of $90,000.00 for the District to fund the efforts of the Watershed Protection Collaborative; and Authorization for the Director of Public Works to negotiate and execute an agreement in an amount not to exceed $90,000.00 with CONCUR, Inc for the administration of the Watershed Collaborative Process, on condition of approval of the reimbursement agreement by the City and the Santa Clara Valley Water District. BACKGROUND On November 4, 2002 the Council approved a Resolution requesting that the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) defer action on its proposed Watershed Protection Ordinance in favor of an extended public review process to ensure a satisfactory outcome for local governments and others who would be affected by the ordinance. The SCVWD Board, responding to that request and those of others, agreed to establish and follow a collaborative process in an effort to reach consensus on the roles and responsibilities of the district and the cities within the district. In order to organize and manage that effort, the district and the cities agreed to engage the services of to CONCUR, Inc., a professional facilitation firm. The cost of this effort is not to exceed $90,000. City staff agreed, subject to Council approval, to negotiate and manage the contract with CONCUR. The district, in turn, has agreed to provide the funding for this effort. Therefore, staff is recommending that the Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute the agreement with SCVWD to provide for the reimbursement of up to $90,000 to pay for the CONCUR services, and to authorize the Director of Public Works to negotiate and execute the agreement with CONCUR to implement the program. Printed on Recycled Paper [ ~. -.~/ RECOMMENDATION Adoption of Resolution No. 03- 0qq authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Water District to reimburse the City in an amount not to exceed $90,000 for payment to CONCUR, authorizing the Director of Public Works to negotiate and execute and agreement with CONCUR, Inc. for facilitation services for the Watershed Protection Collaborative in an amount not to exceed $90,000. Submitted by: Ralph A. Quails, Jr. ~r Director of Public Works Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 03-047 DRAI T A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT IN THE AMOUNT OF $90,000 TO FUND THE EFFORTS OF THE WATERSHED PROTECTION COLLABORATIVE WHEREAS, on November 4, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 02- 199, requesting that the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) defer action on its proposed Watershed Protection Ordinance; and WHEREAS, in response to the request, the SCVWD Board agreed to establish and follow a collaborative process in an effort to reach consensus on the roles and responsibilities of the District and cities within the district; and WHEREAS, in order to organize and manage the collaborative process, the District and cities agreed to hire CONCUR, Inc., a professional facilitation firm; and WHEREAS, SCVWD has agreed to reimburse the City of Cupertino up to $90,000 for all costs incurred, provided the City agrees to negotiate and manage the contract with CONCUR, Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby authorizes the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Reimbursement Agreement with Santa Clara Valley Water District in an amount not to exceed $90,000 on behalf of the City of Cupertino. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 3rd day of March 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 03-048 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH CONCUR, INC. IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $90,000 FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE WATERSHED PROTECTION COLLABORATIVE PROCESS WHEREAS, in response to a request, the Santa Clara Valley Water District has agreed to establish and follow a collaborative process in an effort to reach consensus on the roles and responsibilities of the District and cities within the district regarding its Watershed Protection Ordinance; and WHEREAS, in order to organize and manage the collaborative process, the District and affected cities have agreed to hire CONCUR, Inc., a professional facilitation finn; and WHEREAS, with City Council approval, the City agrees to negotiate and manage the contract with CONCUR, Inc. to implement the program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby authorizes the Director of Public Works to negotiate and execute an agreement with CONCUR, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $90,000 on behalf of the City of Cupertino. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 3rd day of March, 2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF cupertino City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3220 FAX: (408) 777-3109 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUMMARY Agenda Item No. i .5 Meeting Date: March 3, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Public heating on the 2002-03 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Funds. BACKGROUND The City of Cupertino has received $17,843 in Local Law Enforcement Block Grant funds for the fiscal year 2002-03. Such funds were made available through the Bureau of Justice Assistance for the purposes of reducing crime and improving public safety. The grant requires a local match of 10%, or $1,983. Local Law Enforcement Block Grant funds are restricted to specific types of program expenditures. The City requested funds for the purpose of establishing crime prevention programs involving cooperation between community residents and law enforcement personnel to control, detect, or investigate crime or the prosecution of criminals. In prior years, these grant funds have been used for several Public Dialogue Consortium (PDC) Projects. These are community-based action projects in which residents of Cupertino, working with the City government and law enforcement officials, explored possible ways of enhancing public safety. In addition, a small amount of the funding was used to provide family counseling for "at-risk" kids. This year's allocation will be utilized to fund the neighborhood captain program and %t- risk" counseling. The PDC will continue to meet with neighborhoods and the Sheriff's Department for this successful community-policing program. As part of the grant requirements, an advisory board was established to review the application and make recommendations to the City for the use of funds received under the program. The board includes representatives from law enforcement, the court system, the public school system and local nonprofit groups active in crime prevention. This group has met and concurred with the project. Printed on Recycled Paper 15~I RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council receive public comments on the proposed use of 2002-03 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Funds. Submitted by: Carol A. Atwood Director of Administrative Services Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager Agenda Item No. Application: Applicant: Property Owner: Property Location: City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 Fax: (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department Housing Services Summary Agenda Date: March 3~ 2003 GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 City of Cupertino Various Citywide - along Stevens Creek Boulevard - including properties between Stellir~g Road and De Anza Boulevard in the Heart of the City Specific Plan area. Application Summary: Draft Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan for the Cupertino Crossroads area in the Heart of the City Specific Planning area along Stevens Creek Boulevard between Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Approve the Negative Declaration, EA-2002-01; 2. Approve the General Plan amendment, file number GPA-2002-05, in accordance with the Planning Commission Resolution No. 6173 (not needed ff Option C is approved); and 3. Approve the amendment ro the Heart of the City Specific Plan, file number SPA- 2002-01, in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 6174. OR 4. Approve Option C discussed la~er in this report. BACKGROUND · On January 22, 2002, the City Council authorized initiation of the Downtown Village Plan based on the recommendations of the Planning Commission. · On September 23, 2002, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft Downtown Village Plan at a study session and was generally supportive of the plan. · SlmCf met with property owners in the planning area on January 29, 2002, to discuss the initiation of the Downtown Village Plan. Also, owners were individually invited to the study session and scheduled meetings. The project Applications: GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 March 3, 2003 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Page 2 was also advertised in the newspaper and in the Cupertino Scene to reach residents and customers. During the May 3, 2002, Community Congress, participants were asked to comment on creating a Downtown Village with buildings located closer to the street, wider sidewalks, streetlights, and active ground floor uses. 81% of those responding to this question, favored a downtown village with related amenities (see Exhibit A). On June 2002, the Godbe Resident Satisfaction Survey asked residents the following question: "Another proposal for improving the City of Cupertino is to create a downtown area along Stevens Creek Boulevard between Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard. The new downtown are would include benches, trees, and .additional shopping opportunities. Considering this proposal, would you support or oppose the creation of a downtown area in Cupertino?" 75% of the respondents supported the proposal (see Exhibit B). On November 4, 2002, the City Council and Planning Commission had a study session to review the Draft Plan. The Chamber of Commerce was invited and a number of residents attended as well. The City Council, Planning Commission, Chamber of Commerce and residents had a number of concerns and comments about specific elements in the Plan and the process, which will be addressed in this report. The City Council and Planning Commission directed staff to allow additional time and to establish a process for public input. Between December 2002 and February 2003, staff conducted the following: ~' Resident Surveys - · Staff sent out a questionnaire regarding key elements of the Crossroads Plan in the December 2002 the Cupertino Scene, which is mailed out to every Cupertino resident. · Notices for two neighborhood meetings in January 2003, were sent to residents within a 1/2 -mile radius of the planning area. Staff also attended a meeting on February 4, 2003, hosted by a resident of Cupertino (see Exhibit C). ,r' Merchants and Property Owners - Staff had a meeting of property owners in January 2002 to discuss the Crossroads Plan. Staff additionally sent out questionnaires to property owners to get feedback on key elements of the Plan. ~' Non-residents and customers - Staff has worked with the Chamber of Commerce in developing property owner and customer surveys. Survey results, comments and staff responses are provided in Exhibit D. On February 10, 2003, the Planning Commission recommended approval (3-1) of the changes required to implement the Crossroads Plan without the proposed increase in heights. A discussion is provided further in the report. On February 18, 2003, the City Council discussed the schedule for the Crossroads Plan in relation to the General Plan. Applications: GPA-2002-05, $PA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 March 3, 2003 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Page 3 DISCUSSION The Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan area is within the Heart of the City Specific Planning area and includes the first tier of properties on both sides of Stevens Creek Boulevard from Stelling Road to De Anza Boulevard, comer properties at the intersections of Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard and the public right-of way on Alves Drive. The purpose of the Crossroads Plan is to create a vibrant, high- quality pedestrian-scaled shopping district in the historic shopping core of Cupertino. The Crossroads Plan does not propose changes to land uses or an increase in development intensity. Original Proposal To create an active, walkable commercial district, the Crossroads Plan recommended the following changes to the General Plan height limitations and the Heart of the City Plan requirements for streetscape, setbacks, heights and building fo~ms: · Changing building setbacks from 35 feet from the curb in the existing Heart of the City Plan to 20 feet from the curb along Stevens Creek Boulevard (Exhibit A). · Implementing a 20-foot wide sidewalk with street furniture and street trees along Stevens Creek Boulevard. · Currently, the maximum height of buildings is 36 feet with height exceptions allowed up to an additional 9 feet for features such as underground parking, pitched roofs, and entry towers. The Crossroads Plan proposed maximum building heights of 45 feet with height exceptions allowed up to an additional 10 feet in the front half of properties. Buildings above 36 feet along the Stevens Creek frontage would step back at a 45-degree slope to reduce the impact of taller portions. The Crossroads Plan also proposed lowering heights from 36 feet or three stories in the existing Heart of the City Plan to two stories or 30 feet for buildings and building segments adjacent to single family homes and along Alves Drive. Figure 1 indicates building envelopes in the Heart of the City Plan and Figure 2 indicates building envelopes proposed in the original Crossroads Streetscape Plan. Typical single-family on Scofield Drive 1:1 slope ****,~'"'fromcurb Eastbound Stevens Creek Boulevard 35-ft sidewalk/ landscaping setback Figure 1. ,Existinq: Heart of the City Specific Plan Applications: GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 March 3, 2003 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Page 4 Typical single-family on Scofield Drive 1:1 slope from curb Eastbound Stevens Creek Boulevard ~_ 1~ depth of ,. 20-ft property property "'sidewalk Figure 2. Heiqhts Dronosed by the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission revieWed the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan at a public hearing on February 10, 2003. The Commission discussed heights, setbacks, and streetscape improvements recommended in the Crossroads Plan. Seven members of the public commented on the Crossroads Plan. Their comments involved density, heights and choosing an alternative location. The Planning Commission identified the key issues relating to the Crossroads Plan as heights and setbacks, and recommended against the proposed increase in heights. The recommendation was to keep maximum building heights to 36 feet with exceptions up to 45 feet per the Heart of the City Specific Plan. In order to ensure privacy and reduce impacts to residences in the rear, the Commission accepted the recommendation to reduce maximum building heights to two stories or 30 feet in the rear of properties adjacent to residential uses. Figure 3 indicates the maximum building heights recommended by the Planning Commission. The Commission recommended approval (4-0) of the Negative Declaration and the Heart of the City Specific Plan amendment required to implement the Crossroads Plan. The Planning Commission also recommended approval (3-1) of the General Plan amendments to allow buildings within the 1:1 setback from curb (subject to the recommended heights as mentioned above), with Commissioner Wong voting against the General Plan amendment. General Plan Based on the Planning Commission's recommendation on February 10, 2003, the Crossroads Plan requires the following amendments to the General Plan: · Since buildings are required to be built 20 feet from the curb instead of 35 feet from the curb, a General Plan amendment would be required to allow portions of buildings to extend into the 1:1 slope line. Applications: GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 March 3, 2003 Crossroads Area Streetsca[0e Plan Page 5 Heart Of The City Specific Plan The Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan, as recommended by the Planning Commission, requires the following amendments to the Heart of the City Specific Plan: · Reducing the 35-foot setback to a 20-foot setback from face of curb. · Modifying the 26-foot landscape easement including a 5-foot or 6-foot wide sidewalk to a 20-foot wide sidewalk with street trees and landscaping. % .. 1 1 s ope Typical single-family ~ % ~ fr ' i ~ om CUrD on Scofield Drive · r'" ..... ' ~'~~~!1 '~6 Eastbound Stevens ' . . .-: , ,I "3~oo Creek Boulevard ~- 20-ft. *o property sidewalk Figure 3. Heights recommended by Planning Commission Public Input Resident Survey- Cupertino Scene Out of the 116 responses received in January 2003, about 52% of the residents in the survey supported the Crossroads Plan, while 62% supported the sidewalks, and 66% supported the active retail. .Proper .ty Owner Survey Out of the fifteen property owners fronting Stevens Creek Boulevard, seven responses were received. About 86% of the respondents were in favor of the Plan. Customer Survey Out of the 104 customers surveyed in February 2003, 51%-77% were in favor of the sidewalks and active retail proposed by the Crossroads Plan and 41% to 73% felt that they would shop in the Crossroads area more often if the sidewalks proposed in the Crossroads Plan and active retail were provided. Neighborhood Meetings About 35 people attended each of the two neighborhood meetings organized by staff in January 2003.~ Approximately 140 people attended the resident meeting on February 2003. Concerns were expressed about increased heights, density, traffic, and blocking the views of mountains due to increased heights proposed in the Plan. A number of the issues concerning density, land uses and traffic are directly related to the General Plan. In addition, increased heights are no longer proposed by the Applications: GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-0! March 3, 2003 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Page 6 Crossroads Plan. Therefore, staff believes that the major concerns of the Crossroads Plan have been addressed. Schedule On February 18, 2003, the City Council discussed the schedule for the Crossroads Plan. The Council evaluated delaying the Crossroads Plan for approximately four to six months until completion of the General Plan, and decided to proceed with the scheduled March 3, 2003 public hearing. Council members also expressed an interest in allowing the Bottegas retail building to proceed ahead independently. Recommendations Based on the comments received, the Council may choose the following options: A. Approve the Crossroads Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission. B. Delay the schedule for the Crossroads Plan and evaluate it as part of the General Plan. ' C. Approve an amended Crossroads Plan that is consistent with the General Plan as discussed below. Option C This option (see Figure 4) consists of the following changes to the Crossroads Plan recommended by the Planning Commission: · Increase the width of the landscape and sidewalk strip from twenty feet to twenty-five feet from edge of curb -this will create a wider tree planting and landscape strip between the sidewalk and curb, allow more space for streetscape elements, and let buildings set back further from the street (twenty-five feet instead of the previously recommended twenty feet). This will require an amendment to the Heart of the City Specific Plan to reduce the 35-foot sidewalk and landscape setback to 25 feet. · Keep primary building bulk within a 1:1 slopefrotn the curb and reduce building heights at the twenty-five foot setback from thirty-six feet to twenty-five feet and- this change is consistent with the General Plan and responds to concems about tall buildings and preserving views of mountains. With the recommended reduction in heights and increased setbacks, Option C will not require a General Plan amendment. Staff believes that this option addresses the major concerns of the residents, while allowing the Bottegas retail application to proceed in a timely manner. Applications: GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 March 3, 2003 Crossroads Area Streetscape Flma Page 7 % .1 1 sope Typical single-family %~ fro .... on Scofield Drive . ./ .. **% ,,,,.U,L, / ,,' I-=-.- ~ I '"' ~,%%Ea~tbound Stevens property sidewalk Figure 4, Hei.clhts - Option C Prepared by: Aarti Shrivastava, Senior Planner Ste~e Piasecki, Director Of Community Development APPROVED BY: David W. Knapp, City Manager ENCLOSURES Initial Study Recommendation of the Environmental Review Committee Draft Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Resolution No. 6173 of the Planning Commission recommending the amendment to the General Plan Resolution No. 6174 of the Planning Commission recommending the amendment to the Heart of the City Specific Plan Staff report for February 18, 2003 City Council public hearing Staff report for February 10, 2003 Planning Commission public hearing Exhibit A: Page 17 of the Community Congress Summary Report Exhibit B: Page 10 of the Godby Resident Satisfaction Survey Exhibit C: Flyer for resident meeting on February 4, 2003. Exhibit D: Public comments regarding the Crossroads Plan. G: \Planning\PDREPORT \pcGPAreports \ SPA_2002.01cc3.DOC City of Cupertino 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3251 CUPE INO FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department ICase File N~-01 / PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ~ttachmente :'~ Project Title: Downtown VHla~e ~lan Project Location: ~rope~ies frontinq Stevens Creek Boulevard between De Anza Boulevard anO Stellinfl Road {see plan set) ~rojeet Description: the Downtown Villaqo ~lan intends to croato a pedestrian "downtown" shoppin~ district in the historic shoppin~ core of Cupe~ino (see pti 3 for detailed description). Environmental lhe planninfl area consists mamlg of retail, commercial and office uses. There are also planned developmont residential uses and a church in the southwest section of the plannin~ ama. The plannin~ ama is bounded bg sinflle4amilg uses and Faria Elementa~ to the south, and sinflle4amHg and multi-familg residential uses to the no~h. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Area (ac.)- 93 acres Building Coverage - NA Exist. Buildings- 720,000sf office/commercial Proposed Bldg. - NA. Zone - P - Mixed Use Planned Devpt. G.P. Designation - Commercial/Office/Residential/Public Facility Assessor's Parcel Nos. - See Proiect Information on p.q 3. If Residential, Units/Gross Acre - 35units/acre max. Unit Type #1 Unit Type #2 Unit Type #3 Unit Type #4 Total# Rental/Own Bdrms Total s.f. Price Unit Type #5 Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check) [] Monta Vista Design Guidelines [] N. De Anza Conceptual [] Heart of the City Specific Plan If Non-Residential, Building Area - NA Max. Empl.IShift - NA Parking Required NA Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area - YES [] S. De Anza Conceptual [] S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual [] Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & Landscape s.f. FAR-NA Parking Provided NA [] NO [] A. CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN SOURCES Co Do 1. Land Use Element 2, Public Safety Element 3, Housing Element 4. Transportation Element 5. Environmental Resources 6. AppendixA- Hillside Development 7. Land Use Map 8. Noise Element Amendment 9. City Ridgeline Policy 10. Constraint Maps CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS 11. Tree Preservation ordinance 778 12. City Aerial Photography Maps 13. "Cupertino Chronicle" (California History Center, 1976) 14. Geological Report (site specific) 15. Parking Ordinance 1277 16. Zoning Map 17. Zoning Code/Specific Plan Documents 18. City Noise Ordinance CITY AGENCIES Site 19. Community Development Dept. List 20. Public Works Dept. 21. Parks & Recreation Department 22. Cupertino Water Utility OUTSIDE AGENCIES 23. County Planning Department 24. Adjacent Cities' Planning Departments 25. County Departmental of Environmental Health OUTSIDE AGENCIES (Continued) 26. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 27. County Parks and Recreation Department 28. Cupertino Sanitary District 29. Fremont Union High School District 30. Cupertino Union School District 31. Pacific Gas and Electric 32. Santa Clara County Fire Department 33. County Sheriff 34. CALTRANS 35. County Transportation Agency 36. Santa Clara Valley Water District OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS 37. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant Excesses 38. FEMA Flood Maps/SCVWD Flood Maps 39. USDA, "Soils of Santa Clara County" 40. County Hazardous Waste Management Plan 41, County Heritage Resources Inventory 42. Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel Leak Site 43, CalEPA Hazardous Waste and Substances Site OTHER SOURCES 44, Project Plan Set/Application Materials 45. Field Reconnaissance 46. Experience w/project of similar scope/characteristics 47. ABAG Projection Series A. Complete all information requested on the Initial Study Cover page, LEAVE BLANK SPACES ONLY WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLICABLE. B. Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete, the checklist information in Categories A through O. C. You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s) in the "Source" column next to the question to which they relate. Do If you check any of the "YES" response to any questions, you must attach a sheet explaining the potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed. E. When explaining any yes response, label your answer clearly (Example "N - 3 Historical") Please try to respond concisely, and place as many explanatory responses as possible on each paqe. F. Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the Preparer's Affidavit. Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City. ,/'Project Plan Set of Legislative Document V'Location map with site clearly marked (when applicable) 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Planning Area The purpose of the Downtown Village Plan is to create a pedestrian friendly "downtown" shopping district in the historic shopping core of Cupertino. The Downtown Village planning area is within the Heart of the City Specific Planning area and includes the first tier of properties on both sides of Stevens Creek Boulevard from Stelling Road to De Anza Boulevard, corner properties at the intersections of Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard, and the public right-of way on Alves Drive (see Plan for planning area). Assessor's Parcel Nos. included in the planning area: 326-31-018 to 021/034/041 to 042~050 to 056 326-34-043 to 044/064 to 067/071/074 359-07-001 to 006/010/015/017/019 to 023 359-08-005 to 006/013/018 to 022/024 to 027 1,2 Purpose Of The Negative Declaration This Negative Declaration has been prepared by the City of Cupertino as the lead agency to provide the necessary environmental analysis in considering the adoption of the Downtown Village Plan. The Downtown Village Plan constitutes a "project" under CEQA. The Plan consists of the vision, streetscape plan, design standards, and design guidelines. Also, since existing land use and development allocations would not change with adoption of the Plan, it is not expected to affect either the amount or rate of land use change in the planning area. It is anticipated that actual implementation of specific public projects and private development will be phased incrementally as the market dictates (over a period of about 20-30 years). Therefore, while this Negative Declaration provides an environmental analysis for the Downtown Village Plan, it does not provide environmental review for private development within the planning area. 1.2 Other Projects That May Use The Neqative Declaration This environmental document will be used as a basis for the environmental document for implementation of the streetscape plan after construction drawings and details are finalized. 1.3 Other Agencies That May Review The Negative Declaration The Plan recommends replacement of existing bus duck-outs with curbside stops. VTA has reviewed the Phase 1 proposal to replace bus duck-outs with curbside stops and has determined that the 12 ft. wide bike lane and 10 ft. right lane would provide the 22 ft. right lane necessary for curbside stops. The location of one bus stop; at the Target site will eventually be moved to west of the intersection at Saich Way and Stevens Creek Boulevard since the VTA prefers stops at the far-side of an intersection. Other bus stop locations are not proposed to be changed. The final configuration and location of bus stops in the streetscape plan construction documents will require review by the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). 2. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT 2.1 Downtown Villa,cie Plan - Components i) Introduction ii) Vision and Goals iii)Urban Framework and Land Use - circu/ation framework, /and use, and preferred spatia/ organization. iv) Streetscape Plan - addresses the pub/lc right of way modifications to sidewa/ks, crosswa/ks, and traffic and parking/ane a/ignment, and private roads, pedestrian paths, and re/ated improvements in private deve/opments. v) Design Standards and Guidelines - forpub/ic andprivate deve/opment in the p/arming area. vi) Implementation Plan -regu/atory process and phasing of the Streetscape P/an. 2.2 Proiect Schedule The Plan is long-term in scope. It is anticipated that implementation of specific public projects and private development will be phased incrementally, as the market dictates, over a 20-30-year period. 2.3 General Plan and Heart of the City Specific Plan Compliance/Amendments The Plan is generally consistent with development allocations and broad principles in the General Plan. The Downtown Village planning area is part of the Heart of the City Specific Plan area and is generally consistent with the goals and objectives of the Heart of the City Specific Plan, which support mixed use, sidewalks, street trees, and high- quality architecture. To create an active, walkable downtown, the Downtown Village Plan alters the Heart of the City Plan requirements for streetscape, setbacks and building forms. The Plan requires the following changes to the General Plan and the Heart of the City Specific Plan: · General Plan Amendments in the Downtown Villaqe plannin,q area - 1. Building Heights - a. Exceed the maximum heights from 45 feet to 55 feet for buildings in the planning area fronting onto Stevens Creek Boulevard. b. Allow buildings within the maximum heights to encroach into the 1:1 slope from the edge of curb along Stevens Creek Boulevard (in the planning area). · Modifications to the Heart of the City Specific Plan in the Downtown Villaqe planning area - 1. Land Use- generally consistent with the Heart of the City Specific Plan, except that certain uses are limited in the Downtown Streetscape and Required Retail Frontage area (along Stevens Creek Boulevard and along side streets to the first transition point of a development in Downtown Village) 2. Landscape Easement - modify 26-foot landscape easement to allow 20-foot setback from edge of curb and sidewalks per the Streetscape Plan in the Downtown Streetscape and Required Retail Frontage area. 3. Streetwall (building height along 20 foot setback) - establishing minimum streetwall of 25 feet and ground floor plate of 14 feet. 4. Heights - Maximum allowed building heights increased from 36 feet to 45 feet, and maximum excepted building heights increased from 45 feet to 55 feet. 4 ~,ill! EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: [and Supporting Information Sources]o ._ E .- - I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a [] [] [] [] scenic vista? [5,9,24,41,44] b) Substantially damage scenic resources, [] [] [] [] including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? [5,9,11,24,34,41,44] c) Substantially degrade the existing visual [] [] [] [] character or quality of the site and its surroundings? [1,17,19,44] d) Create a new source of substantial light or [] [] [] [] glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? [1,16,44] Item b&c- No Impact The planning area is not located along a designated scenic roadway, nor are there any existing significant scenic elements in the study area. Development in accordance with the design standards and guidelines would improve the architecture along Stevens Creek Boulevard, integration with surrounding development and the aesthetic quality of the environment. Streetscape improvements including medians, street trees and street furniture would also improve the visual setting. Therefore, conformance with the Plan would result in a positive effect on the visual character of the area. Item a&d- Less Than Significant Impact There are views of the foothills to the west, and east hills to the east of the planning area. The increase in allowable building heights along Stevens Creek Boulevard allows is only 9- 10 feet and will help frame the street without significantly impacting views of the foothills to the west and the east hills. While the redevelopment of this site will create a new source of light within a developed setting, the light levels associated with the proposed office and retail uses are not expected to adversely effect day or nighttime views in the area. II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts ISSUES: [and SuppoSing Information Sources] on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Conve~ Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Impodance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? [5,7,39] b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? [5,7,23] c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? [5,7,39] Item a-c- No Impact The planning area is not currently used or zoned for agricultural purposes, nor are there any agricultural uses in the surrounding area that would be affected by the proposed project. III. AIR QUALITY -Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? [5,37,42,44] b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? [5,37,42,44] c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? [4,37,44] d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? [4,37,44] ................................................................................................................................................... - Id- 5 [and Supporting Information Sources] ~- ~ E ~~ =~ ,..~° e ,.,~ ~ ~8 .- - e) Create objectionable odors affecting a [] [] [] [] substantial number of people? [4,37,44] Items a- c - Less than Si,qnificant Impact The proposed Plan is consistent with the General Plan, which in turn is consistent with the Clean Air Plan; therefore, no cumulative air quality impacts are expected to result from this project. Future projects in the study area would be evaluated with respect to air quality impacts resulting from the pollutant emissions related to traffic generated by development. Projects that would result in significant impacts would be revised, or mitigation measures identified, so that the final impacts would be less than significant. The impact of dust generated by grading and excavation construction activities will be limited by a condition of approval requiring watering of newly disturbed surfaces and covering of haul trucks to minimize dust generation. Therefore, no cumulative air quality impacts are expected. The BAAQMD defines sensitive receptors as facilities where sensitive receptor population (children, the elderly, the acutely ill, and the chronically ill) is likely to be located. These land uses include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, retirement homes, convalescent homes, hospitals and medical clinics. Land uses in and immediately adjacent to the study area include commercial, office, daycare and residential uses. Therefore, individual projects would require consistency with CEQA to reduce impacts of projects on sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations to an insignificant level. Items e - No Impact It is not expected that any of the land uses will generate odors affecting a substantial number of people. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES --Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either [] [] [] [] directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any [] [] [] [] riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] c) Have a substantial adverse effect on [] [] [] [] t'~_d_er__al_l.y_.p_.r_ot_e__c_t_ed w_.e.t_l_a._n_d__s_ as de~f.i_n_e.d_.._b_y ................................................................................................................... ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources]O _ E =.~ -~ ~§ .- - "Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? [20,36,44] d) Interfere substantially with the movement [] [] [] [] of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? [5,10,12,21,26] e) Conflict with any local policies or [] [] [] [] ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? [11,12,41] f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted [] [] [] [] Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? [5,10,26,27] Item e - Less Than S(qnificant Impact The Plan recommends new sidewalk and median trees, which would have a positive effect on the planning area. There are no identified heritage trees in the planning area as per the City's Heritage and Specimen Tree ordinance. Redevelopment on individual sites may require replacement of street trees or removal of trees on the site. However since individual projects would need to comply with the City's General Plan, Zoning Code, and Heritage and Specimen Tree ordinance, the impacts would be avoided or reduced to a less than significant level. Item a-d, f- No Impact The planning area is urbanized and redevelopment will not impact threatened or endangered biological resources. No Habitat Conservation Plans or Natural Community Conservation Plans cover the project area. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in [] [] [] [] the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? [5,13,41] b) Cause a substantial adverse change in [] [] [] [] the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? [5,13,41] [and Supporting Information Sources]~ ~_EeC ~ = e~ '~ ~ m-e = E E ~.~ -,~ ~8 .- - c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique [] [] [] [] paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? [5,13,41] d) Disturb any human remains, including [] [] [] [] those interred outside of formal cemeteries? [1,5] Item a-d No Impact The project is currently developed with commercial uses and is not in a sensitive archeological area of the City. There are no historical resources on the site. VI, GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as [] [] [] [] delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. [2,14,44] ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? [] [] [] [] [2,5,10,44] iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including [] [] [] [] liquefaction? [2,5,10,39,44] iv) Landslides? [2,5,10,39,44] [] [] [] [] b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the [] [] [] [] loss of topsoil? [2,5,10,44] c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is [] [] [] [] unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? [2,5,10,39,44] d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined [] [] [] [] in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property? [2,5,10,44] [and SuppoSing Information Sources] '[E ~ ~'[= ~ " ~ ~ _ E .- - e) Have soils incapable of adequately ~ ~ ~ ~ suppoding the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? [6,9,36,39,44] Item a(i-iii), c-d- Less Than SiEnificant Impact According to the Cupe~ino General Plan, the planning area is in a VF-2 zone for which specific hazards may include moderate ground shaking and Iow to moderate ground failure due to liquefaction. The planning area is on the valley floor and not in the immediate vicinity of active faults including the Monte-Vista Shannon, Berrocal and San Andreas faults. The planning area does not lie within the Alquist-Priolo zones and no faults are mapped passing through the site or in its immediate vicinity. Individual projects will be required to provide soils repo~s and comply with Uniform Building Code to avoid or minimize potential damage from seismic shaking. Item a(iv) b, e - No Impact Since the planning area is in a relatively flat area, no landslide activity is expected. There will be no soil erosion or loss of topsoil. The site is se~ed by an existing sewer system. VII. H~ARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or D D D ~ the environment through the routine transpo~, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? [3~,40,42,43,44] b) Create a significant hazard to the public or D D D ~ the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? [32,40,42,43,44] c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle ~ ~ ~ ~ hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quader mile of an existing or proposed school? [~,29,30,40,44] d) Be located on a site which is included on a ~ ~ ~ ~ list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? [2,42,40,43] 10 [and Supporting Information Sources] =,- E '- - -e) For a project located within an airport land [] [] [] [] use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private [] [] [] [] airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] g) Impair implementation of or physically [] [] [] [] interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [2,32,33,44] h) Expose people or structures to a [] [] [] [] significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?[1,2,44] Items a-h - No Impact Since the Plan is consistent with the General Plan in terms of land use and development allocation, implementation will not generate additional hazardous waste, increase risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances, interfere with emergency services, increase exposure of people to hazardous waste or increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass or trees. There are no sites in the planning area listed as contaminated sites in the State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List. The planning area is not within a two-mile radius of the nearest airport (Moffett Airfield/San Jose Airport). Therefore, there would be no related impacts on people residing or working in the project area. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or [] [] [] [] waste discharge requirements? [20,36,37] 11 ISSUES: [and SuppoSing Information Sources] b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or intedem substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not suppod existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? [20,36,42] c) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? [20,36,42] d) Othe~ise substantially degrade water quality? [20,36,37] e) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Bounda~ or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? [2,38] ~ P ace w th n a 100-year food hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect flood flows? [2,38] g) Expose people or structures to a , significant risk of loss, inju~ or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? ~ ~. ~.~t~y~iche, tsunami, or 12 ISSUES:=~ ~u k-'C · ~ .c ~u [and Supporting Information Sources]1|a.~ ~° ~,=,=- ~_ -~e ~ ~, =- ~ =;~.- ~ ot~[ -~e = 'E=~=~' z _~ Item a, c, d, f, g - Less Than S~qnificant Impact The planning area is in a B flood zone (between 100-500 year flood) as per the FIRM maps dated May 1, 1980 and is not in an area subject to flooding from creeks, dams or levees. As indicated above, the planning area consists of relatively flat sites, which are already developed. All individual projects will be required to reduce run-off in accordance with BAASMA guidelines. Items b,e,h - No Impact The planning area does not contain wells or features that would deplete groundwater levels. The planning area is in a B flood zone or between the 100-500 year floods. Individual projects that include residential uses will be reviewed for compliance with FEMA and FIRM requirements. The project will not be affected by seiches, tsunamis or mudflow since it is a non-coastal, flat site in a B flood zone, and is not in an area subject to flooding or flood inundation from creeks, dams and levees. IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established [] [] [] [] community? [7,12,22,41] b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, [] [] [] [] policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [1,7,8,16,17,18,44] c) Conflict with any applicable habitat [] [] [] [] conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? [1,5,6,9,26] Items a-c - Less Than Siqnificant Impact The project is in conformance with the City's General Plan land use and development allocations and Zoning. X. MINERAL RESOURCES --Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known [] [] [] [] mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? [5,10] 13 ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? [5,10] Items a-b - No Impact Mineral resources are not known to exist on the project site. Xl. NOISE -- Would the project result in: [] [] a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? [8,18,44] b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? [8,18,44] c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [8,18] d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [8,18,44] e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [8,18,44] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [8,18] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 14 )orting Information Sources] 'SSUES: [~nd Suppo~in~ Information Sources~ ! I~em a-d - Le~s Than 8~qnifioan~ Impact The planning ~e~ is located in ~n are~ with noise levels 80dB (DNL) and considered normally ~cceptable for new commercial ~nd residential development. Individual projects will be reviewed for compliance with the City's Municipal Code standards (Ohap~er ~0.48 Community Noise Control, which indicate that exterior noise may not exceed 55 dB at night and GSdB in the daytime for commercial development and 50 dB at night and G0 dB in the daytime for residential uses. The planning area will not be subject to excessive levels of groundborne vibration or groundborne noise. Since the Plan is consistent with I~nd uses ~nd development ~lloc~tions in the General Plan, it will not significantly intensify the use of sites in the planning ~rea, or result in increases in the ~mbient noise levels that exist in the project ~rea. Individual projects will also be reviewed for compliance with CEQA. Item~ e~f - No Impacl The project is not within ~ ~o-mile radius of ~ny public airpo~s or priwte airstrips. XlI. POPULATION AND HOUSING -- the project: a) Induce substantial population gro~h in an ama, either dire~ly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through e~ension of roads or other infrastructure)? [3,16,47,44] b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] Item a -Less Than Siqnificant Impact The Plan is consistent with the General Plan, which included an analysis of population and housing and was reviewed in an EIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not induce substantial population gro~h or create a demand for housing that would be inconsistent with the General Plan. Items b-c - No Impact The Plan would not displace existing housing or people. Individual projects would need to comply with the City's relocation assistance and affordable housing requirements as they may apply. XlII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial ....~ r~_p_~i~a~ i m ~.~.~_~..~ o~i~t~e~.~t~_[~~ ..................................................................................................... 15 ISSUES: = ~ ~= ~ o [and Supporting Information Sources] ~ ~_E ~ Em =' ~ =' '""provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? [19,32,44] [] [] [] [] Police protection? [33,44] [] [] [] [] Schools? [29,30,44] [] [] [] [] Parks? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] [] [] [] [] Other public facilities? [19,20,44] [] [] [] [] Item a -Less Than Siqnificant Impact The planning area is located in an urbanized area served by municipal services, including fire protection, police protection, and maintenance of public facilities such as roads. Individual projects would be required to conduct an analysis of services and equipment (fire, police, recycling, water, sewer, utilities, etc.) to ensure that they are adequate to meet demand caused by the development and, if necessary, provide reimbursement for their share of services and equipment necessary to meet demand. XlV. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of [] [] [] [] existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] b) Does the project include recreational [] [] [] [] i facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? [5,44] 16 ISSUES: .~ m '~ [and Supporting Information Sources] ~ '~' E ~~,.-~ ,-, ~ ~o E ~ Item a -No Impact The Downtown Village Plan is consistent with the General Plan, which examined recreational opportunities. The Plan requires projects to incorporate recreational plazas and wide sidewalks with seating, public art, water features that would add to the recreational quality of the area. In addition, all projects with a mixed-use (including residential), or residential component would be required to build in open recreational space as per the City's Zoning Code. This would help to increase recreational opportunities in the planning area. XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is [] [] [] [] substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? [4,20,35,44] b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, [] [] [] [] a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? [4,20,44] c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, [] [] [] [] including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? [4] d) Substantially increase hazards due to a [] [] [] [] design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [20,35,44] e) Result in inadequate emergency access? '~ [] [] [] [2,19,32,33,44] f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? [] [] [] [] [17,44] g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or [] [] [] [] programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [4,34] 17 /4-2'/ ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] Items a-b, d-g - Less Than S{qnificant Impact Since the Plan is consistent with the General Plan, it will not cause an increase in vehicular trips above anticipated market conditions (which have already been accounted for in the General Plan). In addition, the Plan is anticipated to create a positive incentive for use of transit service and reduction of dependence on the automobile. Individual projects would require review by the Fire Department for adequate emergency vehicle access. Traffic volumes in the planning area were 33,162 in 2000. The Level of Service (LOS) standard for intersections in the planning area is LOS D with one exception. The General Plan states that the acceptable threshold for Stevens Creek Boulevard/De Anza Boulevard is LOSE+ (with no more than 45 seconds weighted average delay). The level of service standard for CMP-designated intersections is LOS E (both Stevens Creek/Stelling and Stevens Creek/De Anza are CMP intersections). The LOS at Stelling Road/Stevens Creek Boulevard is LOS C- in the AM and LOS C in the PM peak hours. The LOS for De Anza Boulevard/Stevens Creek Boulevard is LOS C- in the AM peak hour and D+ in the PM peak hour. Therefore, the LOS is consistent with the acceptable standards in the General Plan. Phase 1 - recommends realignment of the roadway along Stevens Creek Boulevard to: Keep the existing number of through lanes (3 in each direction) Remove deceleration lanes Reduce existing travel lane widths in the planning area from about 11 ft. to 10 ft. Increase the width of existing/bike lane on both sides of Stevens Creek Boulevard from 5 ft. to provide a 12 ft. wide parking/bike lane. v' Replace existing bus duck-outs with curbside stops (in line with the parking/bike lane) The proposed travel lane widths comply with Public Works standards for the 35mph speed limit in the planning area. In addition, there is already a parking/bike lane configuration, as recommended in the plan, currently in front of Andersen's Chevrolet. The Plan also recommends consolidation of curb cuts along Stevens Creek Boulevard, which would improve traffic flow. Therefore, the Phase 1 will not cause impacts to traffic flow in the. planning area or the LOS at Stelling Road or De Anza Boulevard intersections. Phase 2 - includes: ¢' Undergrounding power lines in the median along Stevens Creek Boulevard. v' Undergrounding of utility boxes and transformer equipment in sidewalks. v' Enhancing opportunities for public transit (light rail, rapid transit) in conjunction with the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). Phase 3 will have a beneficial impact on visual characteristics of the planning area. Also there would be an improvement in the LOS and traffic flow due to an increase in the use of public transit and reduced dependence on the automobile. · ~-~: ~ 0 ~ISSUES: ~ .==_ ~ . ~ m Valley Transpo~ation Authority (~A) has reviewed the proposal to replace bus duck-outs with curbside stops and has determined that the 12 ~. wide bike lane and 10 ff. right lane would provide the 22 ff. right lane necessa~ for curbside stops. The location of the bus stop at the Target site will eventually be moved to west of the intersection at Saich Way and Stevens Creek Boulevard since the ~A prefers stops at the far side of an intersection. Other bus stop locations are not proposed to be changed. The project site's proximity to public transpo~ation (~A bus lines) is expected to facilitate use of public transit. The Plan is also anticipated to create an incentive for use of transit se~ice and reduce dependence on the automobile. Items c - No Impact Since maximum proposed building heights are 55 feet, development would not be tall enough to result in any change in air traffic pa~erns. XVl. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment ~ ~ ~ ~ requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? [5,22,28,36,44] b) Require or result in the constructien of ~ ~ ~ ~ new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [36,22,28,36] c) Require or result in the construction of ~ ~ ~ ~ new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [5,22,28,36,44] d) Result in a determination by the ~ ~ ~ ~ wastewater treatment provider, which se~es or may se~e the project that it has adequate capacity to se~e the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? [5,22,28,36,44] e) Be se~ed by a landfill with sufficient ~ ~ ~ O permi~ed capacity to accommodate the proje~'s solid waste disposal needs? [5,44] ~ Comply with federal, state, and local ~ ~ ~ ~ statutes and regulations related to solid waste? [5,44] 19 ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] Items a-f- Less than Significant Impact The Plan would not have any impacts on utilities since it is consistent with the General Plan and General Plan EIR, which included an evaluation of the utility impacts of projected new development. All new developments will required to pay necessary fees to help cover the cost of infrastructure needs and maintenance. Projects would also require studies to determine their demands on the infrastructure and would be expected to pay their share of the cost of extending or providing new facilities. Individual projects would be evaluated for an increase in utility demands that would exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. All local utility companies will be notified of the proposed development as it occurs. All individual projects will be required to comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. 2O ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appropriate source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. I hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of such delay or discontinuance. Preparer's Signature /~'-~~~ Print Preparer's Name: Aarti Shrivastava, Senior Planner 21 !d.27 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [] Aesthetics [] Agriculture Resources [] Air Quality [] Biological Resources [] Cultural Resources [] Geology/Soils [] Hazards & Hazardous [] Hydrology / Water [] Land Use / Planning Materials Quality [] Mineral Resources [] Noise [] Population / Housing [] Public Services [] Recreation [] Transportation/Traffic [] Utilities / Service [] Mandatory Findings of Systems Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds that: [] The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [] The proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [] Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE ~JDEC~N, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the j ~propc~ed p_r,~ect, nothing further is required. [valuator Date '~airperson Date 22 CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE October 23, 2002 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on October 23, 2002. PROTECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application No.: CP-2002-01, GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01 (EA-2002-01) Applicant: City of Cupertino Location: Citywide DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST Amendments to Heart of the City Specific Plan to implement the Crossroads Downtown Village concept. (CP-2002-01) Amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan and any other elements affected by the Downtown Village Plan. (GPA-2002-05) Amendment to the Heart of the City Specific Plan to incorporate the Downtown Village Plan. (SPA-2002-01) FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and has no significant environmental impacts. Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development g/erc/REC EA-2002-01 GPA-2002-05 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6173 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO REDUCE BUILDING HEIGHTS FROM 45 FEET TO 30 FEET AT THE REAR OF PROPERTIES, AND TO ALLOW BUILDINGS IN THE 1:1 SLOPE FROM CURB FOR PROPERTIES IN THE CROSSROADS AREA ALONG STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD BETWEEN STELLING ROAD AND DE ANZA BOULEVARD SECTION I: PROIECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01 (EA-2002-01) City of Cupertino Citywide - Heart of the City Specific Planning area (between Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard). WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino initiated application for a General Plan Amendment as described in this resolution; and WHEREAS, the Crossroads area along Stevens Creek Boulevard between Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard is the historic shopping core of the City of Cupertino; and WHEREAS, the Crossroads area has a substantial amount of existing retail shopping facilities; and WHEREAS, the General Plan seeks to implement active, walkable environment in the Heart of the City Specific Plan area; and WHEREAS, Application No. GPA-2002-05 requests to amend the General Plan land use element in the Crossroads Area as follows: to reduce building heights to the rear of properties from 45 feet to 30 feet, and to allow buildings in the 1:1 slope from curb along Stevens Creek Boulevard; WHEREAS, the necessary public notices were given in accordance with the procedure ordinance of the City of Cupertino and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing on the matter; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed amendment will not result in significant environmental impacts; and Id- 30 GPA-2002-05 February 10, 2003 Resolution No. 6173 Page 2 kVHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed amendment provides framing to provide an attractive streetscape and promotes walkability and furthers existing General Plan policies including creating a positive and memorable image for Cupertino, providing a pedestrian-oriented and attractive Heart of the City Planning area, and increased privacy for residential uses to the rear of the Crossroads Area. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED That after careful consideration of the facts, maps, exhibit, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the Planning Commission hereby approves the General Plan Amendment application GPA-2002-05, which amends the General plan to reduce maximum building heights to the rear of properties from 45 feet to 30 feet and to allow buildings in the 1:1 slope from curb for properties in the Crossroads Area along Stevens Creek Boulevard between Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard, as described in Exhibit A and Exhibit B. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February 2003, at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Corr, Saadati and Chairperson Chen COMMISSIONERS: Wong COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development /s/Angela Chen Angela Chen, Chairperson Planning Commission '- G:NPIanning\PDREPORT\RES\GPA-2002-05res.doc EXHIBIT B Section View of North Side of Stevens Creek Boulevard looking Westward Typical single-family on Scofield Drive Existing: Heart of the City Specific Plan Eastbound Stevens Creek Boulevard Typical single-family on Scofield Drive 1~ depth of ,~-20~- property Eastbound Stevens Creek Boulevard Recommended: Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan SPA-2002-01 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6174 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE AN AMENDMENT TO THE HEART OF THE CITY SPECIFIC PLAN TO REDUCE THE SETBACK FROM 35 FEET FROM CURB TO 20 FEET FROM CURB, AND TO MODIFY THE 26-FOOT LANDSCAPE EASEMENT TO A 20-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK WITH STREET TREES AND LANDSCAPING. SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01 (EA-2002-01) City of Cupertino Citywide - Heart of the City Specific Planning area (between Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard). SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Crossroads area along Stevens Creek Boulevard between Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard is the historic shopping core of the City of Cupertino; and WHEREAS, the Crossroads area has a substantial amount of existing retail shopping facilities; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed amendment provides framing to provide an attractive streetscape and promotes walkability and furthers existing General Plan policies including creating a positive and memorable image for Cupertino, providing a pedestrian-oriented and attractive Heart of the City Planning area, and increased privacy for residential uses to the rear of the Crossroads Area. WHEREAS, there are the following revisions required to the Heart of the City Specific Plan to implement the concepts of the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan: to reduce the setback from 35 feet from curb to 20 feet from curb, and to modify the 26-foot landscape easement to a 20-foot wide sidewalk with street trees and landscaping. $PA-2002-01 February 10, 2003 Resolution No. 6174 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino recommends that the City Council authorize amendments to the Heart of the City Specific Plan to implement the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application SP-2002-01, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of February 10, 2003, are incorporated by reference herein. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 10th day of February 2003 at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Corr, Saadati, Wong and Chairperson Chen COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: AppROVED: /s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development /s/Angela Chen Angela Chen, Chairperson Planning Commission G:\PlanningNPDREPORT~RESNSPA-2002-01res2.doc City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 Fax: (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department Housing Services Summary Agenda Item No. __ Agenda Date: February 18, 2003 Application: Applicant: Property Owner: Property Location: GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 City of Cupertino Various Citywide - along Stevens Creek Boulevard - including properties between Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard in the Heart of the City Specific Plan area. Application Summary: Discussion of the schedule for the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council review the public process for the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan and defer any decisions until March 3, 2003, when the Plan will bediscussed with the review of the Planning Commission recommendation. BACKGROUND · On January 22, 2002, the City Council authorized initiation of the Downtown Village Plan based on the recommendations of the Planning Commission. · On September 23, 2002, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft Downtown Village Plan at a study session and was generally supportive of the plan. · Staff met with property owners in the planning area on January 29, 2002 to discuss the initiation of the Downtown Village Plan. Also, owners were individually invited to the study session and scheduled meetings. The project was also advertised in the newspaper and in the Cupertino Scene to reach residents and customers. During the May 3, 2002, Community Congress, participants were asked to comment on creating a Downtown Village with buildings located closer to the street, wider sidewalks, streetlights, and active ground floor uses. Eighty-one percent of those responding to this question, favored a downtown village with related amenities. On June 2002, the Godby Resident Satisfaction Survey asked residents regarding creating a downtown area in the Crossroads. Seventy-five percent favored this idea. Printed on Recycled Paper Id. 3t,, Applications: GPA-2002-05, $PA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 February 18, 2003 Crossroads Area Stree£scape Plan Page 2 · On November 4, 2002, the City Council and Planning Commission had a study session to review the Draft Plan. The Chamber of. Commerce was invited and a number of residents attended as well. The City Cotmcil, Planning Commission, Chamber of Commerce and residents had a number of concerns and comments about specific elements in the Plan and the process, which will be addressed in this report. The City Council and Planning Commission directed staff to allow additional time and to establish a process for public input. · Staff conducted the following public input process: v' Residents- o Staff sent out a questionnaire regarding key elements of the Crossroads Plan in the December 2002 the Cupertino Scene, which is mailed out to every Cupertino resident. o Notices for 2 neighborhood meetings in January 2003 were sent over a ~A mile radius of the planning area. Staff also attended a meeting hosted by Dennis Whittaker, a resident of Cupertino. v' Merchants and Property Owners - Staff had a meeting of property owners to discuss the Crossroads Plan. Staff additionally sent out questionnaires to property owners to get feedback on the key elements of the Plan. Survey results are expected back the week of February 10, 2003. · / Non-residents and customers - Staff has worked with the Chamber of Commerce in developing property owner and customer surveys. The survey results are expected by the end of the week of February 10, 2003. Suggestions and key concerns raised as part of the above processes are attached in Exhibit A. · On February 10, 2003, the Planning Commission recommended approval (3-1) of the changes required to implement the Crossroads Plan without the proposed increase in heights. A discussion is provided further in the report. DISCUSSION To create an attractive, walkable shopping district, the Crossroads Plan originally recommended the following changes to the General Plan height limitations and the Heart of the City Plan requirements for building heights and setbacks: · Setbacks - Changing the setbacks from 35 feet from the curb in the existing Heart of the City Plan to 20 feet from the curb along Stevens Creek Botflevard. · Heights - Currently, the maximum height of buildings is 36 feet with height exceptions allowed up to an additional 9 feet for buildings with underground parking, pitched roofs, and architectural features. The Crossroads Plan proposed maximum building heights of 45 feet with height exceptions allowed up to an additional 10 feet in the front half of properties. Buildings above 36 feet along the Stevens Creek frontage would need to step back at a 45-degree slope to reduce the impact of taller portions. The Crossroads Plan also proposed lowering heights from 36 feet or three stories in the existing Heart of the City Plan to two stories or 30 feet for buildings and building segments adjacent to single family homes and along Alves Drive. Exhibit B /q. Applications: GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan February 18, 2003 Page 3 indicates building envelopes in the Heart of the City Plan and those originally proposed in the Crossroads Streetscape Plan. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission reviewed the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan at a public hearing on February 10, 2003. The Commission discussed heights, setbacks, and streetscape improvements recommended in the Crossroads Plan. Seven members of the public commented on the Crossroads Plan. Their comments involved density, heights,and choosing an alternative location discussed earlier in this report. The Planning Commission identified the key issues relating to the Crossroads Plan as heights and setbacks, and recommended against the proposed increase in heights. The recommendation was to keep maximum building heights to 36 feet with exceptions upto 45 feet. In order to ensure privacy and reduced impacts to residences in the rear, the Commission accepted the recommendation to reduce maximum building heights to two stories or 30 feet in the rear of properties adjacent to residential uses. Exhibit C indicates the maximum building heights recommended by the Planning Commission. The Commission recommended approval (4-0) of the Negative Declaration and the Heart of the City Specific Plan amendment required to implement the Crossroads Plan. The Commission also recommended approval (3-1) of the General Plan amendments required to implement the Crossroads Plan (subject to the recommended heights as mentioned above), with Commissioner Wong voting against the General Plan amendment.. General Plan Issues Based on the Planning Commision's recommendation on February 10, 2003, the Crossroads Plan would require the following amendments to the General Plan: · Since buildings are required to be built 20 feet from the curb instead of 35 feet from the curb, a General Plan amendment would be required to allow portions of buildings to extend into the 1:1 slope line. · Reducing maximum building heights to the rear of properties from 45 feet to 30 feet to reduce impacts to privacy of residential properties to the rear. Staff believes that a majority of the concerns raised by the public have been addressed by the new maximum building heights recommended by the Planning Commission on February 10, 2003. The fundamental issue that remains is the General Plan amendment to allow buildings within the 1:1 slope from the curbdue to the reduced setbacks recommended in the Crossroads Plan. Since the City Council public hearing for the Crossroads Plan has been advertised for March 3, 2003, staff recommends that the Council reserve discussion about the specifics of the Plan until that date. Applications: GPA-2002-05, $PA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 February 18, 2003 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Page 4 Prepared by: Aarti Shrivastava, Senior Planner SUBMITTED BY: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development APPROVED BY: David W. Knapp, City Manager ENCLOSURES Draft Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Exhibit A: Staff report for the Planning Commission public hearing on February 10, 2003. Exhibit B: Section view of Stevens Creek Boulevard Exhibit C: Maximum building heights recommended by the Planning Commission, February 10, 2003. G: \ Pla_truing\ PDREPORT \ pcCPrepor ts \ SPA-2002-01 cc2.DOC lq.S? EXHIBIT A CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: Applicant: Property Owner: Property Location: GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01 Agenda Date: February 10, 2003 EA-2002-01 City of Cupertino Various Citywide - Heart of the City Specific Planning area (between Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard). Application Summary: Draft Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan for the Cupertino Crossroads area in the Heart of the City Specific Planning area along Stevens Creek Boulevard between Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1. Recommend approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration, EA-2002-01; 2. Recommend approval of the General Plan amendment, file number GPA-2002- 05, in accordance with the model resolution; 3. Recommend approval of the amendment to the Heart of the City Specific Plan, file number SPA-2002-01, in accordance with the model resolution. BACKGROUND On January 22, 2002, the City Council authorized initiation of the Downtown Village Plan based on the recommendations of the Planning Commission. On September 23, 2002, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft Downtown Village Plan at a study session and was generally supportive of the plan. Staff met with property owners in the planning area on January 29, 2002 to discuss the initiation of the Downtown Village Plan. Also, owners were individually invited to the study session and scheduled meetings. The project was also advertised in the newspaper and in the Cupertino Scene to reach residents and customers. On November 4, 2002, the City Council and Planning Commission had a study session to review the Draft Plan. The Chamber of Commerce was invited and a number of residents attended as well. The City Council, Planning Commission, Chamber of Commerce and residents had a number of concerns and comments about specific elements in the Plan and the process, which will be addressed in this report. On November 12, 2002, the Planning Commission reviewed and provided comments on the Crossroads Plan and process including neighborhood meetings. The December 2002 the Cupertino Scene, which is mailed out to every Cupertino Applications: GPA-2u~.Z::.,'$PA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 February 10, 2003 Cro,~. _ ; ~Area Streetscape Plan Page 2 resident, included a questionnaire regarding key elements of the Crossroads Plan. On January 15, 2003 and January 22, 2003 neighborhood meetings were held. A total of 65 people attended the meetings. Staff also attended a meeffng held by resident, Dennis Whittaker, on February 4, 2003. Suggestions and key concerns raised as part of the above processes are summarized further in this report. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Crossroads Area Streetscape planning area is within the Heart of the City Specific Planning area and includes the first tier of properties on both sides of Stevens Creek Boulevard from Stelling Road to De Anza Boulevard, comer properties at the intersections of Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard and the public right-of way on A_lves Drive. The purpose of the Crossroads Plan is to create a vibrant, high-quality pedestrian- scale shopping district in the historic shopping core of Cupertino. The CrossrOads Plan does not propose changes to land uses or an increase in development intensity. To create an active, walkable commercial distriCt, the Crossroads Plan recommends changes to the General Plan height limitations and the Heart of the City Plan requirements for streetscape, setbacks, heights and building forms: · Implementing a 20-foot wide sidewalk with street furniture and street trees along Stevens Creek Boulevard. · Adding a parking lane (similar to the on-street parking in front of Anderson's Chevrolet), hnd replacing bus duck-outs with curbside stops on Stevens Creek Boulevard. · Changing the setbacks from 35 feet from the curb in the existing Heart of the City Plan to 20 feet from the curb along Stevens Creek Boulevard (Exhibit A). · Requiring active retail on the ground floor along Stevens Creek Boulevard in the planning area. · Currently, the maximum height of buildings is 36 feet with height exceptions allowed up to an additional 9 feet for features such as underground parking, pitched roofs, and entry towers. The Crossroads Plan proposes maximum building heights of 45 feet with height exceptions allowed up to an additional 10 feet in the front half of properties. Buildings above 36 feet along the Stevens Creek frontage will need to step back at a 45-degree slope to reduce the impact of. taller portions. The Crossroads Plan also proposes lowering heights from 36 feet or three stories in the exisling Heart of the City Plan to two stories or 30 feet for bUildings and building segments adjacent to single family homes and along Alves Drive. Exhibit B indicates building envelopes in the Heart of the City Plan and those proposed in the Crossroads Streetscape Plan. General Plan and Zoning The maximum building heights in the General Plan for the area are 45 feet. The General Plan also requires the primary building bulk to be maintained below a 1:1 Applications: GPA-2O~z~; i.;SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 February 10, 2003 Cross. ::Area Streetscape Plan Page 3 slope line drawn from the curb along Stevens Creek Boulevard. The Crossroads Plan proposes the following amendment to the General Plan: · Increasing maximum building heights from 45 feet to 55 feet in the front half of properties to allow for architectural variety. · Reducing maximum building heights to the rear of properties from 45 feet to 30 feet to reduce impacts to privacy of residential properties to the rear. · Since buildings are required to be built 20 feet from the curb instead of 35 feet from the curb, a General Plan amendment would be required to allow portions of buildings to extend into the 1:1 slope line. Heart Of The City Specific Plan The Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan requires the following amendments to the Heart of the City Specific Plan: · Reduction of the 35-foot setback to a 20-foot setback from face of curb. · Modification of the 26-foot landscape easement to a 20-foot wide sidewalk with street trees and landscaping. COMMENTS City Council and Planning Commission On September 23, 2002, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft Crossroads Plan at a study session. On November 4, 2002, the City Council and the Planning Commission. The Council and Commission had the following comments (responses are listed below): · Streetscape improvements as development occurs may result in a ' hodgepodge' appearance - The Crossroads Plan proposes that streetscape improvements are installed as development occurs, consistent with current street improvement policy. Staff will continue to ensure that improvements blend in with adjacent streetscape conditions. If public trading is made available at a later date, the Council could decide to install large segments of the streetscape as part of a capital improvement project. · There should be a parking district available in the Crossroads Area - Current policy requires cross easements for access and parking between property owners in a single-block. This could be extended on a district-wide basis in the Crossroads Area to encourage walking and allow a more efficient use of parking. · Bring light rail along Stevens Creek to Hwy 85 - Public transit is included in Phase II of the Crossroads Plan. · This is primarily a streetscape plan, therefore the Crossroads Plan should be renamed - Staff recommends renaming it the "Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan." The name acknowledges the historic Crossroads area and the Crossroads Plan's focus on enhancing the streetscape. · This may not be the right location for a downtown - The Crossroads Plan is primarily a streetscape plan, which is acknowledged by the proposed renaming. This also shifts the focus of the Crossroads Plan from creating a downtown to creating a Applications: GPA-z. o2 SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 February 10, 2003 Streetscape Plan Page 4 walkable, pedestrian-friendly, shopping district that can retain and enhance existing retail in the planning area. The traffic study to evaluate Phase I of the Streetscape Plan should be conducted prior to adoption of the Crossroads Plan - Staff is conducting a study to evaluate the safety concerns of the Phase 1 streetscape recommendations. A report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the meeting. Include a recommendation to bring light rail along Stevens Creek Boulevard in Phase II ' of the Streetscape Plan - This has been included as one of the recommendations for change in the Crossroads Plan. The process should include more public participation - ¢' Residents - Notices for 2 neighborhood meetings in January 2003 were sent over a 1000-foot radius of the planning area (include entire blocks for blocks that are partially in the radius). Staff also attended a meeting hosted by Dennis Whittaker, a resident of Cupertino. Comments from the meeting and responses are listed further in the report. ¢' Merchants and Property Owners' - Staff has had a meeting of property owners to discuss the Crossroads Plan. The property owners attending the meeting were mostly supportive of the Plan. Concerns and responses are hsted below. ¢' Non-residents and customers Staff has worked with the Chamber of Commerce in developing property owner and customer surveys. The survey results are expected by the week of February 10, 2003. Property Owners' Comments · Street trees may block store signs - Street trees are currently required as part Of the Heart of the City Plan. The Crossroads Plan recommends a change from Flowering Pears to London Planes, which have a higher canopy and can be pruned to prevent blocking of ground floor signs. · Large tenants may not allow buildings to be built in front - A number of sites currently have large tenants in buildings to the rear of the property with parking in front. There are opportunities to build along the edges of the property, particularly at intersections, where buildings will be more visible without blocking view of the larger tenants to the rear. There is one such building in the application process and another two are being planned. Also, buildings closer to the street will allow a more efficient use of the on-site parking while allowing retention of buildings to the rear. · On-street parking blocking view of stores - On-street parking will help buffer pedestrians from traffic. There are other areas where on-street parking is allowed (such as Anderson's Chevrolet) and staff is unaware of any problems viewing the adjacent businesses. Additionally, businesses will be able to get credit for on-street parking along their frontage. Staff projects that on-street parking on Stevens Creek Boulevard would add about 90-100 spaces to the Crossroads Area Streetscape area. Applications: GPA-2002 :~' .::i:SPA'2002-01, EA-2002-01 February 10, 2003 Streetscape Plan Page 5 Chamber of Commerce Comments Members of the Chamber of Commerce who attended the study session on November 4, 2002 and the neighborhood meeting on January 22, 2003 had the following additional comments and concerns (responses are listed below): · On-street parking will block the view of existing buildings to the rear of the site. Therefore on-street parking should be implemented only along the frontage of new developments that are built to the front - Restriping the lanes only along frontages of new projects may result in problems with alignment of the lanes. Also, some merchants, including Fontana's restaurant, have expressed interest in increasing parking opportunities along the street. · The process should include non-residents who shop in the planning area - Staff proposes to conduct a survey of customers at various locations in the planning area as indicated above. · Trees zoill block the view of stores - The proposed streetscape plan is consistent with the street tree spacing of 25 feet in the Heart of the City Specific Plan. The Crossroads Plan recommends a change from Flowering Pear to London Planes that have a higher canopy to increase visibility of store signs. Public Comments Questionnaire The questionnaire sent out with the January Cupertino Scene included information about the four key changes recommended in the Crossroads Plan and asked for a yes or no response to the changes. Staff received 114 responses. The following is a breakdown indicating percentages of responses to the various issues: ITEM YES NO 1. Provide a 20-foot wide sidewalk with benches, pedestrian lights and street trees with new development or redevelopment._ .............................................................................................................. 62% 38% 2. Bring buildings closer to the street and locate 50% 50% parking to the rear: ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3. Provide active retail at the ground floor ............................................................................................... 66% 34% 4. Decrease building heights adjacent to single- family residential areas, and allow more flexibility for building heights (increase 45 feet to 55 feet) in the front half of properties for architectural features and pitched roofg~ ............................................................................................ 51% 49 % 52% 48% 5. I generally support the Plan~.. ............................................................................................................................ The questionnaire also asked for comments and ideas on the Crossroads Plan. Ideas for area included: providing a village Main Street atmosphere with small shops and restaurants, providing a park or plaza and reducing the number of lanes on Stevens iq-¢ Applications: GPA-2~. ~ :: ~ SPA~2002-01, EA-2002-01 February 10, 2003 Cros~ :Area Streetscape Plan Page 6 Creek Boulevard in the planning area. Issues of concern included traffic and' parking problems with increased development, increased heights blocking the view of the mountains and creating privacy impacts, safety impacts due to increased development, and preferred alternate locations for a walkable streetscape such as VallcO, Oaks, Town Center, and City Hall. These issues have been discussed in detail below. During the May 3, 2002, Community Congress, participants were asked to comment on creating a Downtown Village with buildings located closer to the street, wider sidewalks, streetlights, and active ground floor uses. Eighty-one percent of those responding to this question, favored a downtown village with related amenities (see Exhibit D - page 17 from the Summary Report of the Community Congress). On June 2002, the Godby Resident Satisfaction Survey asked residents regarding creating a downtown area in the Crossroads. Seventy-five percent favored this idea (see Exhibit E - page 10 of the survey results). Neighborhood meetings Two neighborhood meetings were held on January 15, 2003 and January 22, 2003 to inform the public about the Crossroads Plan and to get ideas for the area. About 30 people attended the first meeffng and 35 people attended the second meeting. Staff also attended a meeting convened by a resident, Dennis Whittaker, on February 4, 2003. The meeting was attended by about 130 people. The attendees had a number of questions and concerns about growth and development in the City and comments regarding the General Plan and the Crossroads Plan (summarized below). Public Comments Following is a summary of comments received in the questionnaire, and at neighborhood meetings (responses and recommendations are listed below). · The proposed increase in heights would have privacy and shadowing impacts and block the view of the mountains - ~' Privacy - The Crossroads Plan requires buildings to be placed along Stevens . Creek Boulevard with parking and landscaped buffers in the back. The Crossroads Plan limits the proposed 10 foot increase in heights to the front half of properties along Stevens Creek Boulevard, and only allows the extra heights for pitched roofs and architectural features. It also proposes a reduction of building heights for two stories to the rear. Therefore the Crossroads Plan will not adversely affect privacy when compared to the Heart of the City Plan. *" Shadow impacts -The proposed building envelope in the Crossroads Plan decreases setbacks from 35 feet from the curb to 20 feet from the curb along Stevens Creek Boulevard. Maximum bnilding heights at the streetwall do not exceed 36 feet which is similar to the Heart of the City Plan. As can be seen in Exhibit A, there will be at least 140 feet between buildings across the width of Stevens Creek Boulevard. Additional heights above 36 feet are Iq-q-6 Applications: GPA-Z. _/. ,. SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 February 10, 2003 Cro~ Area Streetscape Plan Page 7 required to be setback at a 45-degree angle. Shadows for building heights above 36 feet fall upon the building itself and not the ground. As a result, there will be no additional shadow impacts due to the proposed increase in heights. ,/ View of mountains - The Crossroads Plan changes the building setback from 35 feet from the curb to 20 feet from the curb. The Crossroads Plan also caps streetwall heights at 36 feet similar to the maximum height in the Heart of the City Plan. Additional heights up to the maximum height of 55 feet will be required to be set back at a 45-degree angle, which will ensure that views of the mountains to the west and east are preserved. As can be seen from Exhibit B, which shows the streetwall across the width of Stevens Creek Boulevard, the proposed building envelopes will cause a minimum impact to views. · Newer developments are too high or too dense (e.g. Kimpton, Verona) - The Crossroads Plan defers to the General Plan for develoPment intensities and does not propose changes to existing densities. Maximum proposed heights in the Crossroads Plan do not exceed three stories or 55 feet, which are mucll lower than the Kimpton or Verona buildings, which range from eight to ten stories. · The Crossroads Plan will result in additional traffic - The Crossroads Plan does not increase development over what is currently allowed in the area. · Residents should be given an idea of how how tall buildings may be with the proposed height increase such as constructing story poles sites in the planning area - It would be difficult and disruptive for existing businesses to construct story poles on sites. Staff has therefore prepared exhibits (see Exhibits A-C) to compare proposed heights in the Crossroads Plan to heights in the Heart of the City Plan, and has provided examples of local buildings with heights comparable to the heights proposed in the Crossroads Plan. · Leave the Crossroads area as it is and,fix other areas such as the Oaks and Vallco. Why don't we create a downtown on side streets such as Saich Way and Bandley Drive - The Crossroads Plan is primarily a streetscape plan. While it attempts to create a more pedestrian friendly and attractive buildings in the local shopping district, it does not preclude these principles from being applied in our other commercial areas. The Crossroads Plan seeks to create attractive, walkable and driver- friendly area along Stevens Creek Boulevard as well as the side streets. The goal is to create attractive, walkable, driveable developments throughout the City. · Be careful with too much growth with downturn in economy - Development will be driven by the market and will be initiated by property owners and developers. While the Crossroads Plan seeks to create an attractive, pedestrian friendly shopping area, it does not seek to influence development activity. · Street too wide and has too many cars passing through to be walkable - In addition, to this observation, a number of people spoke about the challenges of walking and having school children cross major streets including Stevens Creek Boulevard. The Crossroads Plan acknowledges that the current environment is challenging to pedestrians and seeks to create an environment that balances the needs of automobiles with that of pedestrians and bicyclists. This is in keeping with the Applications: GPA-2~..,2:: ':;'$PA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 February 10, 2003 Area $treetscape Plan Page 8 City-wide goal of walkability that will be sought in all developments throughout the City. · Aesthetics: add greenery and landscape buffers - The Crossroads Plan includes street trees and landscape strips adjacent to sidewalks, median trees and large landscape buffers adjacent to existing single-family residences. · Don't mix mixed-use housing with retail and office; remove housing/rom existing plan - The Crossroads Plan defers to the General Plan, which stipulates development intensities and land uses. · On-street parking is dangerous to bikes and cars - The bike/parking lane concept is similar to the situation adjacent to Anderson's Chevrolet in Crossroads Area. Many similar streets including Stevens Creek Boulevard in San Jose and E1 Camino Real in Palo Alto through San Mateo incorporate three lanes of traffic in each direction with parking and/or bike lanes. The s~reetscape concept will also be analyzed in a traffic report to ensure that safety concerns will be addressed. · The 20¥oot wide sidewalk is too narrow to accommodate all the streetscape elbments - The 20-foot sidewalk concept is modeled on streets that include such streetscape elements such as State Street in Santa Barbara, and Castro Street in Mountain View. Other streets with narrower sidewalks that include such streetscape elements are University Avenue in ?alo Alto, and El Camino Real in Menlo Park, Redwood City, and San Mateo. Additional comments and ideas for the Crossroads Plan included the following: · Remove big boxes/rom the area, create pedestrian mall on Target site and move them to Vallco - The Crossroads Plan does not seek to relocate existing developments. Instead, it seeks to support and enhance existing businesses by creating an attractive streetscape and walkable environment. · Have design guidelines for redevelopment of ail commercial areas. · Push envelope o/the General Plan to address diverse community and affordable housing even i/higher/denser - The Crossroads Plan defers to the General Plan in terms of development intensity. · Favor nice looking walkable retail area. · Like goals. · Lower it and it is beautiful. · Like mixed-use concept but six lanes isn't walkable; reduce to two or/our lanes - see above discussion on lane reduction. Conclusions Based on the comments, staff has identified the proposed increase in building heights as the key concern related to the Crossroads Plan. Staff believes that the increased heights, which would be allowed only for pitched roofs and special architectural features, would encourage architectural variety. The increase in height was intended to allow to create more architectural flexibility. Retaining current heights in the Heart of the City Specific Plan will make it more challenging but will not significantly compromise the streetscape concept.. Iq. qT- Applications: GPA-2v~i': ~ SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 February 10, 2003 Cros~ o~ Area Streetscape Plan Page 9 Environmental Review On October 23, 2002, the Environmental Review Committee recommended a Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and has no significant impacts. Process Following the Planning Commission's review of the draft Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan, the project is scheduled for a public hearing at the City Council meeting on March 3, 2003. Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development ENCLOSURES Model Resolutions for GPA-2002-05 and SPA 2002-01 Initial Study Recommendation of the Environmental Review Committee Draft Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Staff report for November 12, 2002 Planning Commission public hearing Staff report for November 4, 2002 City Council and Planning Commission study session Staff report for September 23, 2002 Planning Commission public hearing Staff report for January 22, 2002 City Council public hearing Staff report fo January 14, 2002 Planning Commission public hearing Planning Commission Resolution No. 6124 (Minute Order), January 14, 2002. Exhibit A: Section view of Stevens Creek Boulevard Exhibit B: Section view of South Side of Stevens Creek Boulevard looking westward. Exhibit C: Section view of North Side of Stevens Creek Boulevard looking westward. Exhibit D: Page 17 of the Community Congress Summary Report Exhibit E: Page 10 of the Godby Resident Satisfaction Survey G:\ Plmmfi~g\ PDREPORT\ pcGPArepor ts\ SPA-2002-01pc5.DOC Exhibit B HEIGHTS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED IN THE CROSSROADS PLAN Section View of South Side of Stevens Creek Boulevard looking Westward Typical single-family on Scofield Drive 36' Eastbound Stevens Creek Boulevard Existing: Heart of the City Specific Plan 36' Eastbound Stevens Creek Boulevard Proposed: Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Exhibit C- MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION Section View of South Side of Stevens Creek Boulevard looking Westward Typical single-family on Scofield Drive Eastbound 36' Stevens Creek Boulevard Existing: Heart of the City Specific Plan Typical single-family · · on Scofield Drive * r ~__ ~,4 depth of property Recommended: Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Eastbound Stevens Creek Boulevard CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: Applicant: Property Owner: Property Location: GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01 Agenda Date: February 10, 2003 EA-2002-01 City of Cupertino Various Citywide - Heart of the City Specific Planning area (between Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard). Application Summary: Draft Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan for the Cupertino Crossroads area in the Heart of the City Specific Plannh~g area along Stevens Creek Boulevard between Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1. Recommend approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration, EA-2002-01; 2. Recommend approval of the General Plan amendment, file number GPA-2002- 05, in accordance with the model resolution; 3. Recommend approval of the amendment to the Heart of the City Specific Plan, file number SPA-2002-01, in accordance with the model resolution. BACKGROUND On January 22, 2002, the City Council authorized initiation of the Downtown Village Plan based on the recommendations of the Planning Commission. On September 23, 2002, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft Downtown Village Plan at a study session and was generally supportive of the plan. Staff met with property owners in the planning area on January 29, 2002 to discuss the initiation of the Downtown Village Plan. Also, owners were individually invited to the study session and scheduled meetings. The project was also advertised in the newspaper and in the Cupertino Scene to reach residents and customers. On November 4, 2002, the City Council and Planning Commission had a study session to review the Draft Plan. The Chamber of Commerce was invited and a number of residents attended as well. The City Council, Planning Commission, Chamber of Commerce and residents had a number of concerns and comments about specific elements in the Plan and the process, which will be addressed in this report. On November 12, 2002, the Planning Commission reviewed and provided comments on the Crossroads Plan and process including neighborhood meetings. The December 2002 the Cupertino Scene, which is mailed out to every Cupertino Applications: GPA-2002 , SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 Crossro~ Area Streetscape Plan February 710, 2003 Page 2 resident, included a questionnaire regarding key elements of the Crossroads Plan. On January 15, 2003 and January 22, 2003 neighborhood meetings were held. A total of 65 people attended the meetings. Staff also attended a meeting held by resident, Dennis Whittaker, on February 4, 2003. Suggestions and key concerns raised as part of the above processes are summarized further in this report. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Crossroads Area Streetscape planning area is within the Heart of the City Specific Planning area and includes the first tier of properties on both sides of Stevens Creek Boulevard from Stelling Road to De Anza Boulevard, corner properties at the intersections of Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard and the public right-of way on Alves Drive. The purpose of the Crossroads Plan is to create a vibrant, high-quality pedestrian- scale shopping district in the historic shopping core of Cupertino. The Crossroads Plm~ does not propose changes to land uses or an increase in development intensity. To create an active, walkable commercial district, the Crossroads Plan recommends changes to the General Plan height limitations and the Heart of the City Plan requirements for streetscape, setbacks, heights and building forms: · Implementh~g a 20-foot wide sidewalk with street furniture and street trees along Stevens Creek Boulevard. · Adding a parking lane (similar to the on-street parking in front of Anderson's Chevrolet), and replacing bus duck-outs with curbside stops on Stevens Creek Boulevard. · Changing the setbacks from 35 feet from the curb in the existing Heart of the City Plan to 20 feet from the curb along Stevens Creek Boulevard (Exhibit A). · Requiring active retail on the ground floor along Stevens Creek Boulevard in the planning area. · Currently, the maximum height of buildings is 36 feet with height exceptions allowed up to an additional 9 feet for features such as underground parking, pitched roofs, and entry towers. The Crossroads Plan proposes maximum building heights of 45 feet with height exceptions allowed up to an additional 10 feet in the front half of properties. Buildings above 36 feet along the Stevens Creek frontage will need to step back at a 45-degree slope to reduce the impact of taller portions. The Crossroads Plan also proposes lowering heights from 36 feet or three stories in the existing Heart of the City Plan to two stories or 30 feet for buildings and building segments adjacent to single family homes and along Alves Drive. Exhibit B indicates building envelopes in the Heart of the City Plan and those proposed in the Crossroads Streetscape Plan. General Plan and Zoning The maximum building heights in the General Plan for the area are 45 feet. The General Plan also requires the primary building bulk to be maintained below a 1:1 Applications: GPA-2002. SPA~2002-01, EA-2002-01 February 10, 2003 Crossro~ Area Streetscape Plan Page 3 slope line drawn from the curb along Stevens Creek Boulevard. The Crossroads Plan proposes the following amendment to the General Plan: · Increasing maximum building heights from 45 feet to 55 feet in the front half of properties to allow for architectural variety. · Reducing maximum building heights to the rear of properties from 45 feet to 30 feet to reduce impacts to privacy of residential properties to the rear. · Since buildings are required to be built 20 feet from the curb instead of 35 feet from the curb, a General Plan amendment would be required to allow portions of buildings to extend into the 1:1 slope line. Heart Of The City Specific Plan The Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan requires the following amendments to the Heart of the City Specific Plan: · Reduction of the 35-foot setback to a 20-foot setback from face of curb. · Modification of the 26-foot landscape easement to a 20-foot wide sidewalk with street trees and landscaping. COMMENTS City Council and Planning Commission On September 23, 2002, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft Crossroads Plan at a study session. On November 4, 2002, the City Council and the Planning Commission. The Council and Commission had the following comments (responses are listed below): · Streetscape improvements as development occurs may result in a ' hodgepodge' appearance - The Crossroads Plan proposes that streetscape improvements are installed as development occurs, consistent with current street improvement policy. Staff will continue to ensure that improvements blend in with adjacent streetscape conditions. If public funding is made available at a later date, the Council could decide to install large segments of the streetscape as part of a capital improvement project. · There should be a parking district available in the Crossroads Area - Current policy requires cross easements for access and parking between property owners in a single-block. This could be extended on a district-wide basis in the Crossroads Area to encourage walking and allow a more efficient use of parking. · Bring light rail along Stevens Creek to Hwy 85 - Public transit is included in Phase II of the Crossroads Plan. · This is primarily a streetscape plan, therefore the Crossroads Plan should be renamed - Staff recommends renaming it the "Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan." The name acknowledges the historic Crossroads area and the Crossroads Plan's focus on enhancing the streetscape. · This may not be the right location for a downtown - The Crossroads Plan is primarily a streetscape plan, which is acknowledged by the proposed renaming. This also shifts the focus of the Crossroads Plan from creating a downtown to creating a Applications: GPA-2002 , SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 Crossro~ Area Streetscape Plan February 10, 2003 Page 4 walkable, pedestrian-friendly, shopping district that can retain and enhance existh~g retail in the planning area. The traffic study to evaluate Phase I of the Streetscape Plan should be conducted prior to adoption of the Crossroads Plan - Staff is conducting a study to evaluate the safety concerns of the Phase 1 streetscape recommendations. A report will be provided to the Planning Commission at the meeting. Include a recommendation to bring light rail along Stevens Creek Boulevard in Phase II of the Streetscape Plan - This has been included as one of the recommendations for change in the Crossroads Plan. The process should include more public participation - · " Residents - Notices for 2 neighborhood meet~gs in January 2003 were sent over a 1000-foot radius of the planning area (include entire blocks for blocks that are partially in the radius). Staff also attended a meeting hosted by Dennis Whittaker, a resident Of Cupertino~ Comments from the meeting and responses are listed further in the report. · / Merchants and Property Owners - Staff has had a meeting of property owners to discuss the Crossroads Plan. The property owners attending the meeting were mostly supportive of the Plan. Concerns and responses are listed below. · / Non-residents and customers Staff has worked with the Chamber of Commerce in developing property owner and customer surveys. The survey results are expected by the week of February 10, 2003. Property Owners' Comments · Street trees may block store signs - Street trees are currently required as part of the Heart of the City Plan. The Crossroads Plan recommends a change from Flowering Pears to London Planes, which have a higher canopy and can be pruned to prevent blocking of ground floor signs. · Large tenants may not allow buildings to be built in front - A number of sites currently have large tenants in buildings to the rear of the property with parking in front. There are opportunities to build along the edges of the property, particularly at intersections, where buildings will be more visible without blocking view of the larger tenants to the rear. There is one such building in the application process and another two are being planned. Also, buildings closer to the street will allow a more efficient use of the on-site parking while allowing retention of buildings to the rear. · On-street parking blocking view of stores - On-street parking will help buffer pedestrians from traffic. There are other areas where on-street parking is allowed (such as Anderson's Chevrolet) and staff is unaware of any problems viewing the adjacent businesses. Additionally, businesses will be able to get credit for on-street parking along their frontage. Staff projects that on-street parking on Stevens Creek Boulevard would add about 90-100 spaces to the Crossroads Area Streetscape area. Applications: GPA-2002 , §PA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 February 10, 2003 Crossro~ Area ~reetscape Plan Page 5 Chamber of Commerce Comments Members of the Chamber of Commerce who attended the study session on November 4, 2002 and the neighborhood meeting on January 22, 2003 had the following additional comments and concerns (responses are listed below): · On-street parking will block the view of existing buildings to the rear of the site. Therefore on-street parking should be implemented only along the frontage of new developments that are built to the front - Restriping the lanes only along frontages of new projects may result in problems with alignment of the lanes. Also, some merchants, including Fontana's restaurant, have expressed interest in increasing parking opportunities along the street. · The process should include non-residents who shop in the planning area - Staff proposes to conduct a survey of customers at various locations in the planning area as indicated above. · Trees will block the view of stores - The proposed streetscape plan is consistent with the street tree spacing of 25 feet in the Heart of the City Specific Plan. The Crossroads Plan recommends a change from Flowering Pear to London Planes that have a higher canopy to increase visibility of store signs. Public Comments Questionnaire The questionnaire sent out with the January Cupertino Scene included information about the four key changes recommended in the Crossroads Plan and asked for a yes or no response to the changes. Staff received 114 responses. The following is a breakdown indicating percentages of responses to the various issues: ITEM YES 1. Provide a 20-foot wide sidewalk with benches, pedestrian lights and street trees with new development or redevelopment: ............................................................................................................................ 62% 2. Bring buildings closer to the street and locate parking to the rear: .......................................................................................................................................................................... 50% 3. Provide active retail at the ground floor ................................................................................................ 66% 4. Decrease building heights adjacent to single- family residential areas, and allow more flexibility for building heights (increase 45 feet to 55 feet) in the front half of properties for architectural features and pitched roof§'~ ................................................................................................. 51% 5. I generally support the Plan,- ........................................................................................................................................ 52% NO 38% 50% 34% 49% 48% The questionnaire also asked for comments and ideas on the Crossroads Plan. Ideas for area included: providing a village Main Street atmosphere with small shops and restaurants, providing a park or plaza and reducing the number of lanes on Stevens Applications: GPA-2002 , SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 Crossro, Area Streetscape Plan February 10, 2003 Page 6 Creek Boulevard in the planning area. Issues of concern included traffic and parking problems with increased development, increased heights blocking the view of the mountains and creating privacy impacts, safety impacts due to increased development, and preferred alternate locations for a walkable streetscape such as Vallco, Oaks, Town Center, and City Hall. These issues have been discussed in detail below. During the May 3, 2002, Community Congress, participants were asked to comment on creating a Downtown Village with buildings located closer to the street, wider sidewalks, streetlights, and active ground floor uses. Eighty-one percent of those responding to this question, favored a downtown village with related amenities (see Exhibit D - page 17 from the Summary Report of the Community Congress). On June 2002, the Godby Resident Satisfaction Survey asked residents regarding creating a downtown area in the Crossroads. Seventy-five percent favored this idea (see Exhibit E - page 10 of the survey results). Neighborhood meetings Two neighborhood meetings were held on January 15, 2003 and January 22, 2003 to inform the public about the Crossroads Plan and to get ideas for the area. About 30 people attended the first meeting and 35 people attended the second meeting. Staff also attended a meeting convened by a resident, Dennis Whittaker, on February 4, 2003. The meeting was attended by about 130 people. The attendees had a number of questions and concerns about growth and development in the City and comments regarding the General Plan and the Crossroads Plan (summarized below). Public Comments Following is a summary of comments received in the questionnaire, and at neighborhood meetings (responses and recommendations are listed below). · The proposed increase in heights would have privacy and shadowing impacts and block the view of the mountains - ,; Privacy - The Crossroads Plan requires buildings to be placed along Stevens Creek Boulevard with parking and landscaped buffers in the back. The Crossroads Plan limits the proposed 10 foot increase in heights to the front half of properties along Stevens Creek Boulevard, and only allows the extra heights for pitched roofs and architectural features. It also proposes a reduction of building heights for two stories to the rear. Therefore the Crossroads Plan will not adversely affect privacy when compared to the Heart of the City Plan. v' Shadow impacts -The proposed building envelope in the Crossroads Plan decreases setbacks from 35 feet from the curb to 20 feet from the curb along Stevens Creek Boulevard. Maximum building heights at the streetwall do not exceed 36 feet which is similar to the Heart of the City Plan. As can be seen in Exhibit A, there will be at least 140 feet between buildings across the width of Stevens Creek Boulevard. Additional heights above 36 feet are Applications: GPA-2002 , SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 February 10, 2003 Crossro~ Area Streetscape Plan Page 7 required to be setback at a 45-degree angle. Shadows for building heights above 36 feet fall upon the building itself and not the ground. As a result, there will be no additional shadow impacts due to the proposed increase in heights. ,/ View of mountains - The Crossroads Plan changes the building setback from 35 feet from the curb to 20 feet from the curb. The Crossroads Plan also caps streetwall heights at 36 feet similar to the maximum height in the Heart of the City Plan. Additional heights up to the maximum height of 55 feet will be required to be set back at a 45-degree angle, which will ensure that views of the mountains to the west and east are preserved. As can be seen from Exhibit B, which shows the street-wall across the width of Stevens Creek Boulevard, the proposed building envelopes will cause a minimum impact to views. · Newer developments are too high or too dense (e.g. Kimpton, Verona) - The Crossroads Plan defers to the General Plan for development intensifies and does not propose changes to existing densities. Maximum proposed heights in the Crossroads Plan do not exceed three stories or 55 feet, which are much lower than the Kimpton or Verona buildings, which range from eight to ten stories. · The Crossroads Plan will result in additional traffic - The Crossroads Plan does not increase development over what is currently allowed in the area. · Residents should be given an idea of how how tall buildings may be with the proposed height increase such as constructing story poles sites in the planning area - It would be difficult and disruptive for existing businesses to construct story poles on sites. Staff has therefore prepared exhibits (see Exhibits A-C) to compare proposed heights in the Crossroads Plan to heights in the Heart of the City Plan, and has provided examples of local buildings with heights comparable to the heights proposed in the Crossroads Plan. · Leave the Crossroads area as it is andfix other areas such as the Oaks and Vallco. Why don't we create a downtown on side streets such as Saich Way and Bandley Drive - The Crossroads Plan is primarily a streetscape plan. While it attempts to create a more pedestrian friendly and attractive buildings in the local shopping district, it does not preclude these principles from being applied in our other commercial areas. The Crossroads Plan seeks to create attractive, walkable and driver- friendly area along Stevens Creek Boulevard as well as the side streets. The goal is to create attractive, walkable, driveable developments throughout the City. · Be careful with too much growth with downturn in economy - Development will be driven by the market and will be initiated by property owners and developers. While the Crossroads Plan seeks to create an attractive, pedestrian friendly shopping area, it does not seek to influence development activity. · Street too wide and has too many cars passing through to be walkabIe - In addition, to this observation, a number of people spoke about the challenges of walking and having school children cross major streets including Stevens Creek Boulevard. The Crossroads Plan acknowledges that the current environment is challenging to pedestrians and seeks to create an environment that balances the needs of automobiles with that of pedestrians and bicyclists. This is in keeping with the Applications: GPA-2002 , SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 Crossro, Area Streetscape Plan February 10, 2003 Page 8 City-wide goal of walkability that will be sought in all developments throughout the City. · Aesthetics: add greenery and landscape buffers - The Crossroads Plan includes street trees and landscape strips adjacent to sidewalks, median trees and large landscape buffers adjacent to exis~ag single-family residences. · Don't mix mixed-use housing with retail and office; remove housing from existing plan - The Crossroads Plan defers to the General Plan, which stipulates development intensities and land uses. · On-street parking is dangerous to bikes and cars - The bike/parking lane concept is similar to the situation adjacent to Anderson's Chevrolet in Crossroads Area. Many similar streets including Stevens Creek Boulevard in San Jose and E1 Camino Real in Palo Alto through San Mateo incorporate three lanes of traffic in each direction with parking and/or bike lanes. The streetscape concept will also be analyzed in a traffic report to ensure that safety concerns will be addressed. · The 20-foot wide sidewalk is too narrow to accommodate all the streetscape elements - The 20-foot sidewalk concept is modeled on streets that include such streetscape elements such as State Street in Santa Barbara, and Castro Street in Mountain View. Other streets with narrower sidewalks that include such streetscape elements are University Avenue in Palo Alto, and El Camino Real in Menlo Park, Redwood City, and San Mateo. Additional comments and ideas for the Crossroads Plan included the following: · Remove big boxes from the area, create pedestrian mail on Target site and move them to Vallco - The Crossroads Plan does not seek to relocate existing developments. Instead, it seeks to support and enhance existing businesses by creating an attractive streetscape and walkable environment. · Have design guidelines for redevelopment of ali commercial areas. · Push envelope of the General Plan to address diverse community and affordable housing even if higher~denser - The Crossroads Plan defers to the General Plan in terms of development intensity. Favor nice looking walkable retail area. Like goals. Lower it and it is beautiful. Like mixed-use concept but six lanes isn't walkable; reduce to two or four lanes - see above discussion on lane reduction. Conclusions Based on the comments, staff has identified the proposed increase in building heights as the key concern related to the Crossroads Plan. Staff believes that the increased heights, which would be allowed only for pitched roofs and special architectural features, would encourage architectural variety. The increase in height was intended to allow to create more architectural flexibility. Retaining current heights in the Heart of the City Specific Plan will make it more challenging but will not significantly compromise the streetscape concept.. Iq- 8 Applications: GPA-2002 , SPA-2002-01, EA-2002-01 February 10, 2003 Crossro Area Streetscape Plan Page 9 Environmental Review On October 23, 2002, the Environmental Review Committee recommended a Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and has no significant impacts. Process Following the Planning Commission's review of the draft Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan, the project is scheduled for a public hearing at the City Council meeting on March 3, 2003. Preparedby:AartiShrivastava, SeniorPlarmer c~L_Z~-Z' ~'~z-~2~'/4'~ Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development ENCLOSURES Model Resolutions for GPA-2002-05 and SPA 2002-01 Initial Study Recommendation of the Environmental Review Committee Draft Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Staff report for November 12, 2002 Planning Commission public hearing Staff report for November 4, 2002 City Council and Planning Commission study session Staff report for September 23, 2002 Planning Commission public hearing Staff report for January 22, 2002 City Council public hearing Staff report fo January 14, 2002 Planning Commission public hearing Planning Commission Resolution No. 6124 (Minute Order), January 14, 2002. Exhibit A: Section view of Stevens Creek Boulevard Exhibit B: Section view of South Side of Stevens Creek Boulevard looking westward. Exhibit C: Section view of North Side of Stevens Creek Boulevard looking westward. Exhibit D: Page 17 of the Community Congress Summary Report Exhibit E: Page 10 of the Godby Resident Satisfaction Survey G:~ Plm~fing\ PDREPORT~ pcGPArepor ts\ SPA-2002-01pc5.DOC EXHIBIT A ' CUPERTINO Development Nodes ._ ~ - ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ Cl' ~ Cenle': P '°vid' gateway 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% la Strong~ Agree a Agree a ~a~ree a S~ong~ ~agree I "Sticky-Note" comments from the Development Nodes Dot Board: · :'Something musl be done. The City loses sales tax revenues. Vallco is easier to access than Hwy 280, so it really should be more des[rable. · :'What is the height on all buildings? (Downtown Village) · :'(Downtown Village) Yes, but not necessarily at the Crossroads. (De Anza Boulevard & Stevens Creek Boulevard) · :' Needs to be a real walking environment. Notjust more buildings closer to the street. Sidewalks big enough for outside cafes and restaurant seating. ':' Mention was made of entertainment at Vallco. One concern I have is the cost. However, I have an idea - make the entertainment be relatively cheap to produce and be unique. Make it a comedy club and/or improv, club. City of Cupertino Genera/Plan Update Community Congress, May 3, 2002 Page 17 EXHIBIT B 15, Establishing a network of paths and roads for people who are.walking, biking, or rotler-blading would take away spade on streets and roads currently being used by card.. Considering that space would be taken away from cars, do you. support or oppose using existing City funds to establish a network of walking and biking paths? (GET ANSWER, THEN ASK): Would that be strongly (support/oppose) or somewhat (support/oppose)? Strongly support'-------. 39% " Somewhat support ....... 26% Somewhat oppose ....- .................. 12% Strongly oppose 16% (DON'T READ) DKJNA, - 7% ~Another propdsal for improving the City of Cupertino is to create a downtown area along Stevens Creek Boulevard between Stelling Road and De Anza (DEE-ANZA) Boulevard. The new downtown area would include benches, . trees, and additional shopping opportunities. Considering this proposal, Would you support or oppose the creation of (GET ANSWER, .THEN ASK): Would that be strongly (support/oppose) or somewhat(support/oppose)? ~ Strongly support ..... ~ Somewhat support ~, Somewhat oppose .... ~. Strongly oppose ....... 15% City of Cupertino Resident ,.~atlsfactlon Sunmy Prellminao/ Topl~e Repo~l June 2002 ~lo¢lba Rasearch an# Analysls Page 10 Neighborhood Alert EXHIBIT C and view Cupertino as it is now, since it may drastically change in the future. £00/ as you drive the main boulevards of Stevens Creek and De^nza and view the horizons and the foothills. The city is moving in the direction of HIGH RISE/HIGH DENSITY along those roads. at the General Plan meetings on Feb. 11 and/or March 4 at City Hall~ 5:00 p.m. -8:00 p.m., or view the Intemet. Look now at the intersection of De Anza and Stevens Creek towards the Cypress Hotel and see what the city may allow in the furore on both main boulevards throughout the city. This may be the last chance to let the City Council and City planners know how you feel A community meeting is set for Feb. 4 from 6:45 p.m. -9:00 p.m. at Quinlan Community Center on Stelling Road near Stevens Creek Blvd. The community can communicate to our city leaders, through a LARGE ATTENDANCE at this meeting, that there is substantial disagreement with their direction. Their current thinking, ff implemented,.will result in transformation of our suburban area to a massive urban area with major negative consequences. Iq-hz.- EXHIBIT D EXHIBIT D PUBLIC COMMENTS REGARDING THE CROSSROADS PLAN Resident Survey The questionnaire sent out with the January Cupertino Scene included information about the four key changes recommended in the Crossroads Plan. Staff received 116 responses. The following is a breakdown of responses to key elements of the Plan: CUPERTINO SCENE - RESIDENT SURVEY ITEM YES 1. Provide a 20-foot wide sidewalk with benches, pedestrian lights and street trees with new development or redevelopment ......... 62% 2. Bring buildings closer to the street and locate parking to the rear 50%. 3. Provide active retail at the ground floor .................................. 66% 4. Decrease building heights adjacent to single-family residential areas, and allow more flexibility for building heights (increase 45 feet to 55 feet) in the front half of properties for architectural features and pitched roofs .................................................... 51% 5. I generally support the Plan .................................................. 52% NO 38% 50% 34% 49% 48% The questionnaire also asked for comments and ideas on the Crossroads Plan. Ideas for area included: providing a village Main Street atmosphere with small shops and restaurants, providing a park or plaza and reducing the number of lanes on Stevens Creek Boulevard in the planning area. Issues of concern included traffic and parking problems with increased development, increased heights blocking the view of the mountains and creating privacy impacts, safety impacts due to increased development, and preferred alternate locations for a walkable streetscape such as Vallco, Oaks, Town Center, and City Hall. These issues have been discussed in detail below. Property Owner Survey Staff sent questionnaires to property owners to get their input on the key elements of the plan. Out of the twenty-two property owners in the area (fifteen of whom front Stevens Creek Boulevard), seven responses were received. All responses were from property owners fronting Stevens Creek Boulevard. The following is a breakdown of responses to key elements of the Plan: Iqd 3- PROPERTY OWNER SURVEY - 7 responses ITEM YES 1. Provide a 20-foot wide sidewalk with benches, pedestrian lights and street trees with new development or redevelopment ......... 71% 2. Bring buildings closer to the street and locate parking to the rear 86% 3. Provide active retail at the ground floor .................................. 86% 4. Decrease building heights adjacent to single-family residential areas, and allow more flexibility for building heights (increase 45 feet to 55 feet) in the front half of properties for architectural features and pitched roofs .................................................... 100% 5. I generally support the Plan .................................................. 86% NO 29% 14% 14% 0% 14% Customer Survey In February 2003, staff conducted customer surveys about their opinion regarding elements of the Crossroads Plan. About 104 customers were surveyed. Responses regarding key elements of the Plan are as follows: CROSSROADS CUSTOMER SURVEY 1. What is the most important to you when you choose where to shop? 49% .....Convenience to home/work 48 % ...... Parking 37% ...... Walkable downtown atmosphere with attractive storefronts 53% ...... Large mix of retail shops, large and small 5 % ........ Large mall setting 2. If the Crossroads Area were to be renovated, what would improve the area (check more than one): 51% ..... Wider sidewalks with benches and pedestrian lighting 77% ....Active retail: restaurants, bookstore, etc. 30%....Buildings built closer to the street with active retail for a downtown atmosphere. 11%....On street parking along Stevens Creek Boulevard 3. What would make you want to shop more frequently in the Crossroads Area (check more than one): 41% ..... Wider sidewalks with benches and pedestrian lighting 73% ..... Active retail: restaurants, bookstore, music store, etc. 27% ..... Buildings built closer to the street with active retail for a downtown atmosphere. 14% ..... More parking along Stevens Creek Boulevard. Neighborhood meetings Two neighborhood meetings were held on January 15, 2003 and January 22, 2003 to inform the public about the Crossroads Plan and to get ideas for the area. About 30 people attended the first meeting and 35 people attended the second meeting. Staff also attended a meeting convened by a resident on February 4, 2003 (see Exhibit D for flyer). The meeting was attended by about 130-140 people. The attendees had a number of questions and concerns about growth and development in the City and comments regarding the General Plan and the Crossroads Plan (summarized below). Summary of Public Comments Following is a summary of comments received in the questionnaire, and at neighborhood meetings (responses and recommendations are listed below). · The proposed increase in heights would have privacy and shadowing impacts and block the view of the mountains - · " Privacy - The Crossroads Plan requires buildings to be placed along Stevens Creek Boulevard with parking and landscaped buffers in the back. The Crossroads Plan limits the proposed 10 foot increase in heights to the front half of properties along Stevens Creek Boulevard, and only allows the extta heights for pitched roofs and architectural features. It also proposes a reduction of building heights for two stories to the rear. Therefore the Crossroads Plan will not adversely affect privacy when compared to the Heart of the City Plan. ~' Shadow impacts -The proposed building envelope in the Crossroads Plan decreases setbacks from 35 feet from the curb to 20 feet from the curb along Stevens Creek Boulevard. Maximum building heights at the streetwall do not exceed 36 feet which is similar to the Heart of the City Plan. As can be seen in Exhibit A, there will be at least 140 feet between buildings across the width of Stevens Creek Boulevard. Additional heights above 36 feet are required to be setback at a 45-degree angle. Shadows for building heights above 36 feet fall upon the building itself and not the ground. As a result, there will be no additional shadow impacts due to the proposed increase in heights. ,/ View of mountains - The Crossroads Plan changes the building setback from 35 feet from the curb to 20 feet from the curb. The Crossroads Plan also caps streetwall heights at 36 feet similar to the maximum height in the Heart of the City Plan. Additional heights up to the maximum height of 55 feet will be required to be set back at a 45-degree angle, which will ensure that views of the mountains to the west and east are preserved. As can be seen from Exhibit B, which shows the streetwall across the width of Stevens Creek Boulevard, the proposed building envelopes will cause a minimum impact to views. · Newer developments are too high or too dense (e.g. Kimpton, Verona) - The Crossroads Plan defers to the General Plan for development intensities and does not propose changes to existing densities. Maximum proposed heights in the Crossroads Plan do not exceed three stories or 55 feet, which are much /q- 5 lower than the Kimpton or Verona buildings, which range from eight to ten stories. The Crossroads Plan will result in additional traffic - The Crossroads Plan does not increase development over what is currently allowed in the area. Residents should be given an idea of how how tall buildings may be with the proposed height increase such as constructing story poles sites in the planning area - It would be difficult and disruptive for existing businesses to construct story poles on sites. Staff has therefore prepared exhibits (see Exhibits A-C) to compare proposed heights in the Crossroads Plan to heights in the Heart of the City Plan, and has provided examples of local buildings with heights comparable to the heights proposed in the Crossroads Plan. · Leave the Crossroads area as it is andfix other areas such as the Oaks and Vallco. Why don't we create a downtown on side streets such as Saich Way and Bandley Drive - The Crossroads Plan is primarily a streetscape plan. While it attempts to create a more pedestrian friendly and attractive buildings in the local shopping district, it does not preclude these principles from being applied in our other commercial areas. The Crossroads Plan seeks to create attractive, walkable and driver-friendly area along Stevens Creek Boulevard as well as the side streets. The goal is to create attractive, walkable, driveable developments throughout the City. · Be careful with too much growth with downturn in economy - Development will be driven by the market and will be h-fitiated by property owners and developers. While the Crossroads Plan seeks to create an attractive, pedestrian friendly shopping area, it does not seek to influence development activity. · Street too wide and has too many cars passing through to be walkable - In addition, to this observation, a number of people spoke about the challenges of walking and having school children cross major streets including Stevens Creek Boulevard. The Crossroads Plan acknowledges that the current environment is challenging to pedestrians and seeks to create an environment that balances the needs of automobiles with that of pedestrians and bicyclists. This is in keeping with the City-wide goal of walkability that will be sought in all developments throughout the City. · Aesthetics: add greenery and landscape buffers - The Crossroads Plan includes street trees and landscape strips adjacent to sidewalks, median trees and large landscape buffers adjacent to existing single-family residences. · Don't mix mixed-use housing with retail and office; remove housing from existing plan - The Crossroads Plan defers to the General Plan, which stipulates development intensities and land uses. · On-street parking is dangerous to bikes and cars - The bike/parking lane concept is similar to the situation adjacent to Anderson's Chevrolet in Crossroads Area. Many similar streets including Stevens Creek Boulevard in San Jose and E1 Camino Real in Palo Alto through San Mateo incorporate three lanes of traffic in each direction with parking and/or bike lanes. The streetscape concept will also be analyzed in a traffic report to ensure that safety concerns will be addressed. · The 20-foot wide sidewalk is too narrow to accommodate all the streetscape elements - The 20-foot sidewalk concept is modeled on streets that include such streetscape elements such as State Street in Santa Barbara, and Castro Street in Mountain View. Other streets with narrower sidewalks that include such streetscape elements are University Avenue in Palo Alto, and El Camino Real in Menlo Park, Redwood City, and San Mateo. Additional comments and ideas for the Crossroads Plan included the following: · Remove big boxes from the area, create pedestrian mall on Target site and move them to Vallco - The Crossroads Plan does not seek to relocate existing developments. Instead, it seeks to support and enhance exisffng businesses by creating an attractive slxeetscape and walkable environment. · Have design guidelines for redevelopment of all commercial areas. · Push envelope of the General Plan to address diverse community and affordable housing even if higher~denser - The Crossroads Plan defers to the General Plan in terms of development intensity. · Favor nice looking waIkable retail area. · Like goals. · Lower it and it is beautiful. · Like mixed-use concept but six lanes isn't walkable; reduce to two or four lanes - see above discussion on lane reduction. The City of Cupertino · Community Development Department February 3, 2003 CITY COUNCIL Richard Lowenthal, Mayor Michael Chang Sandra James Patdck Kwok Dolly Sandoval PLANNING COMMISSION Charles Corr, Chairperson Marc Auerbach Angela Chen Taghi Saadati Gilbert Wong STAFF David W. Knapp, City Manager Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development Ciddy Wordell, City Planner Aarti Shdvastava, Senior Planner, Project Manager Peter Gilli, Senior Planner Ralph Quails, Director of Public Works Cover Photo Bethesda Retail District, Bethesda, Maryland, Cooper, Carry, Inc. AMENDMENTS BY CITY COUNCIL CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER2 VISION AND GOALS CHAPTER 3 URBAN DESIGN AND LAND USE CHAPTER4 STREETSCAPE PLAN 10 CHAPTER5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 23 CHAPTER 6 DESIGN GUIDELINES 32 CHAPTER 7 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 38 INTRODUCT!ON The Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan is a vision for the historic Crossroads shopping core of Cupertino located along Stevens Creek Boulevard be~een Stelling road and De Anza Boulevard. The area predominately consists of retail/commercial and office uses in buildings set to the rear of the properties with parking lots along the street. The intent of this plan is to create an attractive pedestrian-scaled shopping district by encouraging high-quality development that frames the street and provides active ground- The Cupertino Store, Inc. located at the intersection of Stevens Creek and De Anza Boulevard was the largest general store in the Valley in 1904. floor retail uses. The Crossroads Area Stroetscape Plan seeks to implement this concept by providing the following elements: · A comprehensive design vision for a pedestrian-oriented streetscape to complement a high-quality shopping district. · Development Standards and Guidelines for public and private projects. · A coordinated framework for capital projects in the Crossroads area. The Plan is consistent with the goals and development allocations in the General Plan. It draws upon the guiding principles of the General Plan that include walkability, mixed-use, enlivened streetscape, and improving the jobs/housing balance by increasing residential opportunities in Cupertino. The Plan is part of the Heart of the City planning area and is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Heart of the City Specific Plan, which support mixed use, an attractive streetscape, and high-quality architecture. To create an active, walkable shopping district, the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan alters the Heart of the City Plan requirements for streetscape, setbacks and building forms. Crossroads Area Stre~tscape Plan I 5 Planning Area The Crossroads Area is a pad of the Heart of the City Specific Plan and includes the first tier of properties on both sides of Stevens Creek Boulevard from Stelling Road to De Anza Boulevard, corner properties at the intersections of Stelling Road and De Anza Boulevard, and the public right-of way on AIves Drive as depicted in Figure 1 below. 6 I Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Figure 1. CROSSROADS PLANNING AREA ViSiON The Crossroads Area will be a vibrant, high-quality, pedestrian-scaled shopping district. A fively night street dining scene, Bethesda, Maryland. Well designed street furniture, Mountain View, CA Mixed-use shopping district, Willow Glen, San Jose, CA GOALS Land Use: Encourage a diverse mix of compatible uses including active ground floor retail uses and walkable, liveable neighborhoods to create a vibrant shopping and dining atmosphere. Urban Design: Encourage high-quality developments and public improvements that frame the street, improve walkability and pedestrian interest, and create a unique shopping district. Circulation: Create an efficient thoroughfare that facilitates a safe pedestrian environment and the safe and smooth flow of bike and auto traffic, balanced with enhanced oppodunities for public transit. Streetscape: Encourage investment, identity and an exciting shopping/dining atmosphere that establishes streets as community places with pedestrian- friendly streetscapes including landscaping, wide sidewalks, enhanced streetlights, street furniture, and signage. Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan I 7 URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK This section establishes the circulation framework, land use, and preferred spatial organization, which will define the urban form in the Crossroads Area. Figure 2 indicates the Urban Design Framework and required elements. KEY Alves Dr. Controlled Intersection Crossroads Planning Area Travel-way Crossroads Streetscape Required Retail Frontage Side-street Street.scape Standard Interior street/Paseo Standard Special Crossroads En~ Crossroads Gateway Feature - Stelling Gateway Feature On-street Parking Lane / Bike Lane Bus Stop Crossroads Streetscape and Required Retail Frontage -Stevens Creek Boulevard and side streets to the first transition point and/or 100 ft. whichever is greater. Side Street Frontage - Saich Way, Bandley Drive, Bianchi Way, and Alves Drive not including portions qualifying as Downtown/Required Retail above. Intedor Street- Major driveways and non-public streets in a development. Paseo - A pedestrian pathway. Gateway Features- Landscaping/ building elements that announce a transition to a special land use (Crossroads, De Anza college). Crossroads Entry Element- Plaza, pedestrian- scaled kiosk or building element, which defines the entry to Downtown Village. Special Comer Treatment- plazas, active retail, building comer elements, entrances, public art. Figure 2. URBAN DESIGN FRAMEWORK 8 I Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan LAND USE See Urban Design Framework (Figure 2 on page 8) for applicable street frontage requirements: Crossroads Streetscape Required Retail Frontage (along Stevens Creek Boulevard and side streets to the first transition point and/or 100 ft whichever is greater): 1.01 Ground Floor Uses A. Retail - including bookstores, specialty food stores, drug stores, apparel shops, variety stores. B. Restaurants - including cafes and delicatessens and the serving of alcoholic beverages, provided the service is ancillary to food service. C. The following uses shall be allowed not exceeding 50% of the total ground floor space and/or 50% frontage of a building: i. Art galleries; iL Theatres, entertainment and indoor recreation uses. D. Excluded - Drive-through services. 1.02 Upper Floor Uses A. Ground Floor Uses listed in Section 1.01; B. Personal Services - barbershops, beauty parlors, shoe repair shops and tailor shops. C. Business Services. D. Banks, financial institutions, insurance and real estate agencies, travel agencies, photography, and similar studios, which directly serve the public. E. Business and Professional Offices. F. Public and quasi-public uses. G. Residential- density per General Plan. H. Permitted Uses in the General Commercial (CG) Zoning district - if determined by the Director of Community Development to be of the same general character as the uses listed above. Side Street and Interior Street/Paseo Streetscape Frontage (along public streets except for those qualifying as Crossroads Streetscape Required Retail frontage, and major drive,rays and pedestrian paths (paseos) in a private development): 1.03 Ground Floor Uses B. Side street comer parcels shall have neighborhood-serving retail and services including cafes, drycleaners, grocery, etc. C. Ground Floor Uses listed in Section 1.01. D. The uses listed below are allowed, but shall not exceed 50% of the total ground floor space and/or 50 feet frontage of a building, if they can demonstrate that they will generate pedestrian activity and streetside interest compatible with the desired active, pedestrian environment: i. Upper Floor Uses listed in Section 1.02; ii. Automobile showroom. iii. Residential- density per General Plan, except that maximum ground floor space, or frontage restrictions shall not apply. 1.04 Upper Level(s) Uses A. Ground Floor Uses listed in Section 1.04, except that side street comer parcel, maximum floor space, and frontage restrictions shall not apply. Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan I 9 STREETSCAPE PLAN The Streetscape Plan primarily addresses the public dght of way and related improvements. The goal is to establish the street as a public place and an integral part of the community urban space and identity, in addition to being part of a transportation system that services vehicles, bicycles, and people. COMPONENTS The Streetscape Plan consists of the following components to be implemented as new development or redevelopment occurs (see Implementation Plan for details): Phase I (see Figure 3): · Install twenty-foot sidewalk with pedestrian-scaled streetlights, street furniture, and bike racks. · Install public art, water features, etc. · Plant street trees at 25 feet on center. · Retain existing trees and incorporate into design. · Replace bus duckouts with curb-side stops. · Remove deceleration lanes. · Add on-street parking (12 foot wide parking/bike lane). · Plant trees in the median (per recommended tree list). · Crosswalks with textured paving. · Sidewalk bulb-outs at side street intersections and major driveway entrances (except Stelling Rd. and De Anza Blvd.). 7'Pa~ing Lane 5'Bike Lane lO'Lane lO'Lane lO'Lane Stevens Creek Boulevard Centedine (in median) 20' sidewalk 42' street Proposed Phase I conditions from building line to centedine of median: · Setbackto building line (vades from 2-3 ft.) · 20' sidewalk with pavers includes: ,,' Outdoor dining ,/ Street furniture · ,' Pedestrian-scaled street lights with banners v' Custom bus shelters · ,' Street trees at 25 ff. on center. · 7' parking lane · 5' bike lane · Remove deceleration lanes and replace bus duckouts with curb stops · Three 10' wide travel lanes · Trees planted in median · Crosswalks with special paving/markings Total dght of way from centedine of median to property line - 60' lol Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Figure 3. PHASE I STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS Phase II (future phase): · Underground power lines in the median. · Underground utility transformers and equipment in sidewalks · Enhance opportunities for public transit (light rail, rapid transit). STREETSCAPE STANDARDS All projects shall be required to conform to the following frontage requirements: · Crossroads Streetscape and Required Retail Frontage Standard- Along Stevens Creek Boulevard and along side streets to the first transition point and/or 100 ft. subject to City review. · Side Street Standard- Along Saich Way, Bandley Drive, Bianchi Way, and Alves Drive, not including portions qualifying as Crossroads Streetscape and Required Retail frontage. · Interior Street and "Paseo" Standard- For streets and pedestrian paths (paseos) within a project site. Crossroads Streetscape and Required Retail Frontage Standard (see Figures 5 and 6): · Required retail frontage (see Land Use section on page 9). · Buildings with dch materials, texture, articulation, and comer features such as entry towers and cupolas. L Enhanced crosswalks ~' ICorner orientation 1~ a~d entry Corner plaza with ! ,~-~ water element,,/' and seat ,,~ral~ ~. ,, __~.~ Enhanced bulb-out crosswalk., Awninn~ nwr ~.ntri~.~/~ Building "streetwall" with d' i~'¥~'=~vi-n'd~v~' ...... entries facing street __ p y ~--'/ ~g" Sidewalk dining Bike lane....._.,~~ On-street parking Decorative street lights with bannes Figure 5. DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE STANDARD Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Ill · Decorative transit shelters. Plazas at intersections/corners with seating, outdoor dining, · Decorative pedestrian-scaled streetlights. water features and public art. · Street furniture including benches, trash receptacles, bollards, Twenty-foot sidewalk from curb to building line (property bike racks, tree guards and tree grates per Streetscape Plan. dedication to the building line shall be required). · Landscaping with seat walls on street side. Bulb-outs for sidewalks at intersections. · Street trees planted at 25 feet on center. Private development consistent with public sidewalk design · Uplighting for trees in tree grates and provisions to light trees. without extensive landscaping or changes in elevation. , Replace bus duck-outs with curb-side stops. Curb lane shall Up to 5 feet of encroachment into sidewalk area allowed for be 22 feet minimum (including 12-foot parking/bike lane and outdoor dining, awnings and pedestrian-oriented signage 10-foot right lane) per VTA standards. subject to City review. · On-street parking on Stevens Creek Boulevard (12-foot Decorative paving in sidewalks. _ parking/bike lane). Street trees 25 ft. ~ · on center ~ · Building "streetwall" ~ Decorative streetli · with banners Awnings over entries --.~ · and display windo~ ~ ~ ~Landscape elements ~ On~streetparking ~/ Parking/bike lane Sidewalk dinino } =ntriesldisplay windows ,~..~..~, ,Lfacing street t I Sidewalk with decorative pavers 5ft. ~5 ft. encroachment for awningtnd sidewa~dining 20 ft. sidewalk setback ~ Building entries and display windows on the street frontage. Articulate building entries and display windows with awnings or other architectural features. Roof forms such as hips or gables. Outdoor dining with tables, chairs to bring activity to street. Decorative paving and landscaping elements in the sidewalks, Street trees. On-street parking as a buffer for pedestrians on the sidewalk. Figure 6. DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE AND REQUIRED RETAIL FRONTAGE STANDARD 121 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan On-street parking buffers pedestrians from traffic, Redmond, Washington Sidewalk with decorative paving and landscaping, Santa Barbara, CA Outdoor dining activates the street Santa Barbara, CA EXAMPLES OF DESIRED STREETSCAPES Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan 113 Transition From Crossroads Streetscape and Required Retail Frontage Standard to Side Street Standard (see Figure 7): · Corner parcels shall continue the Crossroads Streetscape and Required Retail Frontage standard along the side street frontage to the first transition point and/or 100 feet subject to City review, with a suitable transition to the Side Street Streetscape standard. · Street trees (for side streets) at 25 feet on center after the transition to Side Street standard. · Street furniture including benches, trash receptacles, bollards, bike racks, tree guards and tree grates per the Streetscape Plan. · Parallel on-street parking. · Existing commercial buildings with side/rear walls/loading docks facing the street shall provide fences and landscape buffers toward the street to screen activities from adjacent development. · New commercial buildings and building entrances shall be oriented to the street. · Residential development shall incorporate front entries and stoops odented toward the street. i ! CORNER PROPERTY ! Building "streetwalt" with . ~ Seat wall transition to side street entries facing st._ree.t ~ , /'--' sidewalk standard I ,, ,,,. ~ t -- III ~_ ....... .,~,,~..~.-.,-~/.., ............. - -,· ,~ ~ ~ _..~_~. - Property line [~/.'- .." :.., ...,-' · _.,., 20 ft. sidewalk standard ~ Side street sidewalk standard "~ 112 depth of property or 100 ft. (whichever is greater) 5-ft. separated sidewalk with 5-ft. landscape strip Figure 7. TRANSITION FROM DOWNTOWN STANDARD TO SIDE STREET STANDARD 141 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan · Provide public plaza/park space or other monument/kiosk elements at gateway entrances. · Line the park with active retail uses. Public Plaza with landscaping/ seating and play areas Min. 25 fi. curb radius ---t~rOutes stop On-street parking -r- T' Extend curbs t~ · Orient buildings to the street corner with parking to the rear · Provide entries/special architectural features at comers · Entry plaza at comer with dining, benches, etc. ,.with specialr · For buildings separated from the street by parking lots, provide i pedestrian pathways to the building entrance from the sidewalk. ?l'ypica110 ft. curb radius · For existing buildings set back from the street, consider adding features such as outdoor dining, etc. to bring the building to the corner. Intersections (see Figure 8): Intersections are highly visible locations and are important in setting the "tone" for the Crossroads Area. Following are key ingredients to highlight intersections and make them safe and usable for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit and vehicular traffic: · Provide pedestrian connections to buildings across intersections. · Highlight comer entdes into buildings and developments (even if existing buildings are set back from the street). · Minimize crossing distances across intersections to slow down turning vehicles and improve pedestrian/bike safeb] and comfort by using bulb-outs. · Provide well-designated pedestrian crosswalks (with special paving treatment or striping) pedestrian refuge areas (min. width 6 ft.) in the median. · Reduce curb radii to a maximum of 10 feet to discourage fast tuming vehicles (curb radii for bus routes may be increased to 25 feet maximum to allow turning for buses). · Eliminate channelized right-turn lanes, pork chop islands, which significantly increase speeds of turning vehicles. Figure 8. CONNECTING INTERSECTIONS Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan 115 Side Street Streetscape Standard (see Figure 9): · 10-foot separated sidewalk- 5-foot landscape buffer with street trees on street side and 5-foot sidewalk on the inside. · Street trees planted at 25 feet on center. · Street furniture including benches, trash receptacles, bollards, bike racks, tree guards and tree grates per the Streetscape Plan. · Parallel on-street parking. · Existing commercial buildings with loading docks facing the street shall provide fences and landscape buffers toward the street to screen activities from the adjacent residential properties. · New commercial buildings and building entrances shall be oriented to the street. · Residential development shall incorporate front entries and stoops oriented to the street. Street trees at 25 ff. on center '~-'-'~ _ · Travel lane ............ Travel lane 5 fL separated -'t, ~, · ~ 5 ft. landscape strip Street facing building entries 161 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Figure 9. SIDE STREET STREETSCAPE STANDARD Interior Streets And "Paseos" (Pedestrian Paths): · Interior streets shall have the following elements (see Figure 10a): ,/ 10-foot lanes (one lane in each direction) · ,/On-street parking preferred (angled or parallel). v' Street trees curbside at 20 feet on center. v' Minimum 10-foot wide sidewalks (pavers with tree grates, or pavers with landscape strip subject to City review). ,/' Minimum necessary curb cuts. · Interior paseos shall have the following elements (see Figure 10b): ,/' Special pavers. v' Landscaped planters. v' Entrances to paseos shall be placed between buildings and enhanced to indicate pedestrian access from streets. In addition to the above interior streets and paseos shall have the following elements (see Figure 10b): ,/' Existing commercial buildings with loading docks shall provide fences and landscaping as screening. v' Residential development shall incorporate front entries and stoops along interior streets and paseos. v' Commercial development shall incorporate active uses such as retail, entries, stoops, and landscaped courtyards. Travel lane ~_~ Travel lane -- ~a k with trees and street furniture Interior Streets: · Building at sidewalk with active retail/display windows/ residential stoops on ground floor. · 8-10 ft. wide sidewalks with street trees, landscaping, and street furniture and special paving. · On-street parking. · Pedestrian crossings with special pavers. Paseos: · Special gateway entdes between buildings to "paseos." · Landscaped planters along path. Outdoor dining at edge. · Special paving on "paseos." [a Special paving STREET Active retail entries Figure 10a. INTERIOR STREET CONCEPT Figure 10b. "PASEO" CONCEPT Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan 117 Attractively designed pedestrian paths or "paseos' with front stoops, Whisman Park, Mountain View, CA Special paving and trees enhance this pedestrian sidewalk, Champs-Elysees, Pads Attractive entrance to a pedestrian "paseo" between buildings, Santa Barbara, CA Pedestrian-oriented retail uses lining pedestrian paths or 'paseos' encourage pedestrian circulation, Santa Barbara, CA 181 Crossroads Area Streetscape PlanEXAMPLES OF DESIRED "PASEO" CONCEPTS Street Trees: Stevens Creek Boulevard: · London Planetme (PlatanusXaceffolia) · Planted at twenty-five (25') feet on center, · Installed three (3') feet from inside edge of curb. · Street tree grates provided with uplights to light the street trees. · Provisions for seasonal lights in street trees. Side Street Trees planted at 25 feet on center along curb: · Stelling Road - Crape Myrtle (Lagerstroemia x tuscarora). · Bianchi Way- Saratoga Laurel. · Saich Way- Goldenraintree (Koelreuteria paniculata) · Bandley Ddve - Carolina cherry laurel (Prunus laurocerasus) · De Anza Boulevard - Crape Myrtle ( L agerstroemia x tuscarora). · Alves Drive- Southern Magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora 'St. Mary's~ Planters along sidewalk: · Indian Laurel Fig (Ficus microcarpa) · Japanese Pdvet (Ligustrumjaponicum) Median Trees and Vegetation: · Aristocrat Pear (Pyrus calleryana). · Daylily (Hemerocallis hybdds) · Fortnight Lily (Dietes vegeta) London Planetree Goldenraintree Cherry Southern Maonolia Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan 119 LIGHTING: · Streetliqhts- 20-foot tall Holophane Memphis luminaire on Altlanta pole and arm with banner arms installed at 45 ft. on center (Black). · Banners - 8-foot tall by 30-inch wide banners to be installed on streetlight poles. Design(s) to be decided at a future date. · Transit Shelters - The plan also recommends special transit shelters for the VTA buses. Currently, there are three in the Crossroads Area. The shelter design would be required to conform to the specifications of the VTA (Valley Transportation Authority). Decorative Bus Sheller, Mountain View, CA Streetlight standard- Holophane Memphis luminaire on Atlanda Pole and arm with banner arms. 201 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan STREET FURNITURE: The following are recommendations for street furniture that is decorative, durable and easy to maintain: · Bench: Maglin Furniture Systems Ltd., MLB 310 (Black), Bench ends are made from solid cast aluminium with a seat made of flat bar straps. · Trash Receptacle: Maglin MRC 200-32 (Black) thirty- two gallon trash container constructed of heavy-duty steel fiat bar with a plastic liner and metal lid. · Recycling Bin: Maglin MRC 200-20 (Black) · Tree Grate: Ironsmith Starburst tree grate M4814-1 (48" square)(Black). · Tree Guard: Victor Stanley- Ironsites Series S-6 (Black) · Bike racks: Looped multi-racks (Black) consistent with the design · Bollard: Holophane- Salem non-lighted decorative cast aluminum bollard with ball top BOUS 32/9/BT BK(Black). Combined newspaper racks- Consistent with the design. SIDEWALK PAVING: Sidewalks shall be paved with colored concrete pavers subject to City review. Paving treatment shall vary for every block. Mag/in MLB 310 Bench (Black) Mag/in 200-32 Trash container (Black) Mag/in MRC200-20 Recycling Bins (Black) Victor Stanley -lronsites Series S-6 Tree Guard (B/ack) Ironsmith - Del Sol Tree Grate M4870 S (Black) I Crossroads ,,~,~a Streetscape Plan 21 I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The Development Standards shall be consistent with those in the Heart of the City Specific Plan except for the following. In the case of a conflict, the following standards shall apply: 2.01 DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY Private property dedicated for the effective sidewalk and frontage improvements shall not be subtracted from the new lot area for the purposes of calculating development potential (where applicable). A. Commercial Retail Development- General Plan allocation from the retail commercial development allocation pool. B. Commercial Office Development- General Plan allocation from the office commercial development allocation pool. C. Residential - General Plan allocation from the residential pool for a maximum density of 35 units/gross acre. 2.02 SETBACKS AND BUILD-TO-LINES A. Front Setback and Build-To-Line i. Sidewalk Easement- Buildings shall be set back 20 feet from the curb along Stevens Creek Boulevard and shall provide a 20-foot sidewalk design as per the Streetscape Plan. ii. Build-To-Line - A minimum of 75% of the total property line frontage along Stevens Creek Boulevard shall be occupied by buildings located along the setback line. (a) Building entries shall be setback from the building line by 4 feet and shall be differentiated by means of entry 221 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan features such as roof changes, awnings, etc. (b) Twenty-five (25) percent of the building frontage may be set behind the setback line (to a maximum of 30 feet from the curb) if the additional setback provides a public amenity such as outdoor seating or plaza. iii. Contiguous Building Frontage - Building frontage at the setback line shall be contiguous with existing buildings, Spatial gaps created in the street wall by parking or other non-pedestrian areas shall be minimized or eliminated. Ground floor retail and pedestrian-oriented side walk elements encourage walking- Bethesda, Maryland iv. Comer Buildings- For comer parcels, the building shall continue the sidewalk setback and build-to-line along the side street property frontage to the first transition point and/or 100 ft. subject to City review). v. Allowed Projections into Setback: (a) Ground story pedestrian fin signs and awnings a minimum of 8 feet above the sidewalk shall be allowed to project 3 feet into the front setback area, subject to City review. Building frontage that relates well to the human scale encourages pedestrian activity Building comer treatment including entries and architectural features, Pacific Place, Seattle. Building Form i. Heights (see Genera/Plan) (a) Crossroads Streetscape Frontage: (1) Minimum Streetwall Height - 25 feet. (2) Minimum Ground Floor Plate Height - 14 feet. (3) Maximum Streetwall - 36 feet. (4) Maximum Building Height (i) For half the depth of properties along Stevens Creek Boulevard -3 stodes or 45 feet with upper stodes above 36 feet stepped back a distance equal to the height of the building story (1:1 slope). (ii) For building segments adjacent to single family residential uses - 2 story heights maximum. (5) Maximum Excepted Height- 45 feet subject to City Review. Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan 123 Ground Level Treatment (a) Commercial/Retaih (1) Spacing of Doors and Entries- shall be at intervals of 50 feet or less. (2) Entry Ooors- shall be set back from the wall face at least 4 feet. (3) Facade Modulation - Building walls shall be broken along the street at intervals no greater than 25 feet with variations in openings, building materials and/or building planes. (4) Transparency- A minimum of 60% of the ground level facades shall be transparent window surface. Large blank walls shall be avoided. (5) Opening Size - Shall not exceed 25 feet (a traditional storefront). Windows shall be inset by a minimum of 3 inches from the extedor wall surface to add relief and detail to the far,,;ade. (6) Comer Parcels- Shall incorporate special features such as special comer entrances, display windows, corner roof/tower features, etc. (7) Privacy- Buildings shall be designed and/or arranged to avoid windows facing into windows of residences across side and rear setbacks. (b) Residential: (1) The finish floor elevation of ground-level units shall be no greater than 18 inches above grade. (2) The street-level frontage shall be visually interesting with frequent unit entrances, entry porches and with the pdmary orientation parallel to the street. 241 Crossroads Area Streets~pe Plan (3) Long runs of exposed exterior stairs and parking structures shall not be visible from the sidewalk. 2.03 SITE DEVELOPMENT AND PARKING A. Access i. Pedestrian Access: (a) Site Plans- As a component of site plan review, plans shall demonstrate that adjacent land uses are integrated and that pedestrian access points allow convenient pedestrian activity. (b) New Buildings - Provide entrances directly off the sidewalk along Stevens Creek Boulevard for each storefront. (c) Minor Remodels - For existing buildings that are set back, provide a walkway in special paving (pavers) from the sidewalk to the main building entrance. (d) Common Entrances- Allowed only for stores behind the front fa(;ade or upper stories. ii. Vehicular Access/Curb Cuts: (a) Minimize along Stevens Creek Boulevard and side streets. (b) Shared access between properties. (c) Access along side streets preferred. B, Parking i. Strategies to increase parking availability in the Crossroads Area: (a) On-street parking on Stevens Creek Boulevard. (b) Structured parking as part of redevelopment. (c) Shared parking for mixed-use developments. ii. Parking Requirements: Per the City of Cupertino Zoning Code. Parking provided shall not exceed the minimum parking requirements. iii. Shared Use: Property owners shall enter into an agreement for the shared use of parking spaces. iv. Location: (a) Parking Lots - Shall always be located to the side and rear of buildings. (b) Surface Parking Nong Frontage- Surface parking, including driveways, shall not occupy more than 25% of a property frontage along Stevens Creek Boulevard. Parking structure with ground #oor retail, Mizner Park, Flodda. v. Parking Structures: (a) Location - Away from public streets and behind buildings. Podium parking shall be fronted by ground floor retail space. (b) Design - Underground garage entrances shall be integrated into the design of the building so as to minimize their impact. vi. Curb Cuts and Driveways: (a)Limited Curb Cuts-Minimize driveways and curb cuts. Width of driveways and curb cuts shall be no greater than minimum allowed by the City. (b) Shared D#veway Agreements - Where two parking lots abut and it is possible for a curb cut and ddveway to serve several properties, owners shall enter into shared access agreements. vii. Landscaping For Surface Parking Lots: (a) Parking Lots- Shall provide a minimum of 6 feet of landscaping along with a row of trees (see Streetscape Plan for tree types) along street frontages, side and rear property lines, and adjacent to residential areas. (b)At least 10% of the parking lots should be landscaped with islands of minimum 6-foot width. (c) Trees shall be planted at one for every five parking spaces, not including street trees. Common Open Space i. Commercial Development - Plazas shall face the street and courtyards and shall include outdoor seating. Such areas Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan 125 shall be integrated into the project site design and shall be located adjacent to the effective sidewalk area. ii. Residential Development - Public open space for residents shall be integrated into the site plan. iii. Mixed-Use Development- Public open space shall be integrated into the site plan to provide a buffer between ground floor commercial uses and residential uses and to benefit residential as well as commercial uses. Landscaping And Screening i. Sidewalk Setback - All new development shall establish a 20-foot sidewalk along the Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage (as indicated in the Streetscape Plan). ii. Street Trees -Spacing of 25 feet on center (as indicated in Outdoor plaza and seating activates the street 26[ Crossroads Area Stmetscape Plan Linear parks are an amenity for retail uses and provide a buffer between commercial and residential uses, Kentlands, MD the Streetscape Plan). iii. Easement Improvements - The sidewalk and adjacent areas shall be designed as hardscape for gathering and outdoor activity with accent planters, raised beds, benches and/or other types of pedestrian amenities. The design shall be as indicated in the Streetscape Plan. iv. Utility installation - The placement of traffic control devices (transformers, traffic lights, etc.) and other utility equipment (PG.&E transformers, utility cabinets) shall be carefully considered. Utility installations shall be undergrounded where possible or located in non-prominent, well- screened locations. v. Pedestrian Access To Buildin.qs - Access from public sidewalk shall be provided at regular intervals to entdes of buildings. vi. Screen Fences And Walls - Fences and walls not adjacent to streets and sidewalks shall be a minimum of 6 feet in height and a maximum of 8 feet in height. Where a commercial and residential property share a common line, the sound wall separating the uses shall have a minimum of 8 feet. (See Design Guidelines for recommendations on type and materials.) vii. Trash and Service Equipment- Including satellite receiving dishes and recyling containers, shall be located away from streets and enclosed or screened by landscaping, fencing or other architectural means. Service areas for commercial buildings shall be located away from residential areas whenever possible. 2.04 CROSSROADS AREA SIGN STANDARDS Signs in the Crossroads Area should have pedestrian orientation and scale, artistic quality and unique creative design that reflects the individual character of the business. All signage shall conform to City of Cupedino sign ordinance except as provided below. AD Permitted Signs-Permanent i. Sign Program (a) Signs for tenant spaces in multi-tenant structures or multiple structures on one site are required to have a Sign Program. (b) All signs in a sign program shall have standardized placement and fabrication concepts and shall be compatible with the color and material of the building(s). ii. Primary Signs (a) One building-mounted pdmary commercial sign for each storefront or building facade that fronts a public street0r interior streetJpaseo is permitted. The primary sign area shall not exceed 1 square foot per 1 foot of frontage, subject to meeting other sign design criteria. (b) The design of the primary sign shall be integrated with and complement the overall design of the far,,ade. The sign shall be mounted fiat against the building or awning and shall be located below the second floor windows. (c) On side streets perpendicular to Stevens Creek Boulevard, the pdmary sign may be a projecting sign or awning sign to enhance visibility from Stevens Creek Boulevard. For occupancies fronting on a side street with a second frontage on an alley, the sign may be on the alley side of the building. (d) Neon signs may be used for pdmary, commercial building signs subject to City review. (e) Residential primary signs shall follow the guidelines permitted under Residential Districts referenced in the Sign Ordinance. iii. Pedestrian Signs - Small, typically projecting, signs supported by a decorative chain or bracket, located above the storefront entry and oriented to the pedestrian. (a) One pedestrian sign for each storefront is permitted. A pedestrian sign may also display multiple tenant names if there are multiple tenants in one storefront. The pedestrian sign shall be no larger than 2 feet by 3 feet, Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan 127 subject to meeting the other design criteria. (b) The bottom of pedestrian signs shall be located at least 8 feet above the sidewalk, and be rigidly supported. iv. Monument Signs (a) No monument signs shall be allowed along the Crossroads Streetscape and Required Retail Frontage. (b) Side Street Frontage - an existing building with front entrances set back at least 15 feet from the street on which the building fronts shall be permitted one free- standing monument sign in addition to the primary and pedestrian signs. (1) The monument sign can have a maximum height of 5 feet with an area no larger than 25 square feet per sign face, subject to meeting other design criteria. (2)A monument sign shall be set onto a base or frame, presenting a solid, attractive and well-proportioned appearance that complements the building design and materials. (3) Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed around the base of monument signs to integrate the sign with the ground plane and screen out any Iow level flood lights. v. Directory And Upper Floor Signs (a) For two or more story multiple-tenant buildings, one small directory sign with nameplates of the individual A combination of well-proportioned and compatible wall and fin-signs add interest to these streetscapes, Source: DPZ 281 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan tenants is permitted on the ground floor. The maximum letter height for tenant names is 2 inches. The design of the sign shall be integrated with and complement the building design and materials. (b)Where a second or third story tenant has a separate entry door on the street, a small projecting pedestrian sign is permitted, in keeping with the guidelines for pedestrian signs. Such signs shall be placed near the tenant street entry. vi, Window Signs (a) First Floor - (1)A maximum of one window sign related to the occupancy is permitted per framed window area on the ground floor. (2) Window signage shall not cover more than 20% of the total ama of windows. (3) The maximum letter height for window signs is 12 inches. (4) Window signs shall be professionally designed and constructed. Signs made of gold leaf or painted signs on the glass or other high-quality material that complement the storefront display are permitted. (b) Second Floor - Commercial uses on second floor of multiple story buildings that do not have ground floor occupancy may have window signs in addition to otherwise permitted building-mounted signs. (1) One window sign is permitted per framed window area and cannot exceed 20% of the total second floor transparent glass area of windows. (2) The maximum letter height for window signs is 12 inches. (3) Second floor window signs shall be non-illuminated, and shall consist of paint, gold-leaf or sir~ilar high quality graphic material on the glass surface. (c) Window signs above the second floor are not permitted. (d)Any graphics, displays, or sign panels with lettering more than one inch high, mounted within four feet of a window shall be considered a window sign. There are three exceptions: (1) Displays with lettering less than one inch high; (2) Products on shelves for sale to the public; and (3) Framed information panels with 80% of the area of text in lettering less than one inch high. vii. Special Signage - Flags, Murals, Off-Site signs, and Sidewalk Caf6 Signage. (a) Flags (4) Customized graphic flags not exceeding 6 feet by 10 feet that convey a message through the use of a pictorial or graphic image and which complement the building design am permitted. The lowest point of the flag must be at least 8 feet above the surface of the sidewalk or pedestrian way. (5) Customized flags should be mounted on a decorative bracket attached perpendicular to the building face or can be mounted on top of cupolas or tower elements. (b) Murals (Trompe L'oeil) - Murals painted on the wall surface of a building may be permitted upon approval Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan 129 as part of a Use Permit or an Architectural Site Approval (ASA) permit to ensure the artwork does not constitute a sign otherwise permitted or prohibited and that the artwork complements the design of the building in color, shape and location on the building. (c) Off-Site Signs - Off-site directional signs painted on buildings at the alley intersections to direct pedestrians to business down side streets and/or alleys are permitted with the permission of the property owner. (d) Sidewalk Caf~ Signage (1)Sidewalk caf6 signage on the caf6 umbrella(s) in addition to the main occupancy frontage signs may be permitted. Signage is limited to the name of the caf6 business. (2)The total signage on an umbrella shall not exceed 10% of the area of the umbrella. (3)The maximum letter height is 6 inches and the business logo shall not exceed 1 square foot in area. viii. Sign Lighting (a) External spot or flood lighting shall be placed so that the light source is screened from direct view. (b) Halo-lit or back-lit letters are highly encouraged for both office and retail use. (c) Individual illuminated letters may be appropriate for retail use. (d) Lit cabinet signs are not allowed. 2.05 ix, (e) Where individual letter signs face near-by residential areas, a Iow level of brightness shall be maintained (such as using halo-lit letters). Prohibited Signs (a) Rooftop signs, cabinet signs, readerboard signs, banners (except for grand opening and civic event signs), balloons, flashing signs, billboards, "A"- frame signs, plastic flags, whiteboards, Chalkboards and blackboards are all prohibited. EXCEPTION PROCESS FOR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Consistent with the Head of the City Exceptions except that the following additional finding shall be required: vi. The proposed development is consistent with the vision and goals of the Crossroads Area Streetscape F~lan. 301 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan DESIGN GUIDEUNES The Development Standards shall be consistent with those in the Heart of the City Specific Plan except for the following. In the case of a conflict, the following standards shall apply: 3.01 BUILDING DESIGN B. Massing i. Buildinq Pattern - Infill buildings should reinforce the Infill buildings that respect the established pattern of forms, create a well- balanced streetscape, Atlanta, Georgia strong, established pattern of good building form in the immediate project area. ii. Additions - Additions to existing buildings should be complementary to the odginal building form. iii. Building Composition - Building mass should be articulated to reflect a human scale, both horizontally and vertically. Building elements may include, articulated comer elements, expressed base, middle and top (Tripartite Composition), inset windows, highlighted entry feature and/or prominent cornice or roofline. New building forms and elevations should be detailed and adiculated to create interesting roof lines, and strong pattems of shade and shadow. iv. Tripartite Composition - Buildings should have three recognizable elements: base, middle and top. The design of the base should relate to pedestrians through appropriately scaled building elements. The base should visually support the building and should include features such as thicker walls and heavier materials (e.g. ceramic tile, granite, masonry) or darker colored materials. Tops should create an attractive profile for the building and should include features such as cornices, roof overhangs, stepped parapets, etc. v. Massinq -Large buildings should be designed to reduce their perceived height and bulk by dividing the building mass into smaller-scale components. The modules should range from a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet to a maximum of fifty (50) feet. and should be separated by changes in architectural features such as: facade treatment; pilasters; and/or roof forms vi. Orientation - Buildings should be oriented parallel to Stevens Creek Boulevard. The building fagade may be Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan J 31 A building with active retail and entry features highlights a street comer, Bethesda, MD angled if it creates an opportunity for usable public space, or to enhance comer elements. vii. Corners - These are pdme locations for high visibility. Comer buildings, including those that abut a public sidewalk and/or a surface parking area shall have prominent comer features including entries, architectural features such as towers, etc. Facades i. Active Frontage - Ground floor building frontages should be lined with active uses that generate pedestrian activity such as retail, restaurant, etc. ii. Entries - Building entries should face Stevens Creek Boulevard. They should be easy to identify from the restof the building and shall be emphasized with details, glazing, lighting, signs or awnings. iii. Materials and Finishes - Exterior materials and finishes should convey a sense of structural integrity, permanence and durability. Glass curtain walls exceeding the width of structural bays, horizontal ribbon windows, and mirrored Buildings dch in detail with storefront bays add interest to the streetscape 321 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan glass are not allowed. iv. Ornamentation and Detail- All facades shall received hig h- quality materials, finishes and detailing. To ensure visual interest and an appropriate scale, reveals and recesses are encouraged at windows, doors, and eaves. To avoid an appearance of false applique, veneers should be returned at least two feet from external comers. Material changes should occur at interior comers of major reveals. No wall should have a blank uninterrupted surface exceeding 10 feet without a window, recessed panel, mural, change in texture, change in plane or equivalent treatment. v. Pattem of Openings and Fa(;ade Features - Amhitectural features (windows, pilasters, buildings bays, and storefront) should be based on the buildings structural bay spacing. Architectural features should be carded across windowless walls and should be applied to the sides and rear of buildings. vi. Awnings - Awnings should be consistent with the building plate height and should not exceed one structural bay. Windows i. Upper Story Windows - Upper stories should have a window-to-wall area proportion that is smaller than that of ground floor storefronts. ii. Window Openings - Should be vertical or square in shape and not horizontally-oriented. iii. Window Insets - Windows should be inset a minimum of three (3) inches from the building exterior wall surface. Additionally, shaped frames and sills should be used to enhance opening and add relief to building surfaces. E. Roofs Inset windows add detail to the building facade, Bethesda, MD i. Roof Slopes - Roofs may be fiat if there is an amhitecturally superior comice element that complements the fac,,ade. Sloping roofs should have slopes bebNeen 3:12 and 6:12. ii. Roof Ali.qnment- Sloping roofs should have ddges aligned to be parallel or perpendicular to the street frontage. iii. Roof Overhangs - Overhangs (including cornice overhangs for fiat roofs) should be a minimum of three (3) feet, with additional articulation in the form of support struts, gutter fascia, and/or exposed beams/rafter ends. Cr,.ssroads ~. ea Stre~tscape Plan 133 Fo iV. Materials - The following roof materials are recommended: clay, ceramic or concrete tile. Metal seam made of aluminium, galvanized steel or other coated steel (anodized, fluorocoated or painted) may be appropriate if consistent with the desired building character and approved through design review. Copper and lead roofs should be natural or oxidized. Tar and gravel, composition or elastomeric roofs, should be screened by roofed parapets. Asphalt shingle roofs are not recommended. Parking i. Curb Cuts and Driveways (a) Side Street and Alley Access - Where possible, driveway access should be from side streets. Where alley access exists, ingress and egress from the property should be through the alley. (b) Access From Alleys - The rear of existing buildings shall be designed, where apprepdate, to improve public access from parking lots and service alleys. Signs i. Sign Types (a) Primary Signs- The primary commemial sign should be designed as an integral part of the building. Sign and lettering materials should be high quality and compatible with the building color and material. (b) Monument Signs- Monument and entry signs for parking lots are generally discouraged. Where allowed, they should be Iow profile and set within a landscaped setback. They shall consist of individually lit lettering and/or halo-lit signs. Monument sign materials shall reflect the character of the use and the building the sign 341 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan A well-proportioned wall sign adds to the attractiveness of a facade, Habersham, SC identifies. (c) Awning end Canopy Signs- These are recommended for commercial retail buildings. Awnings should reflect the building's far, de module and should not e×tend for more than fifty (50) feet without a break. Signs on canopies should be integrated with the canopy fascia, or should be in the form of freestanding letters mounted on top and extending above the fascia. (d) Pedestrian-oriented signs -May include projecting "fin" signs, awning located signs, or smaller surface mounted signs. Pedestrian signs shall be supported by decorative chains or brackets, and designed and constructed with a high level of craftsmanship and detail. (e) Window signs - Shall not exceed 20% of the glazing and, shall be located at the lower podion of the window. ii. Sign Design and Materials (a) Lettering - Individual letters are encouraged. (b) Sign Bases - Free-standing sign bases shall be made of permanent, durable materials such as concrete or brick. Bases made of texture-coated sheet metal are discouraged. (c) Materials- Recommended sign materials are: (1) Signboards-wood or metal, with painted, engraved or routed letters, or mounted letters of wood or metal. (2) Silhouette or Figurative Signs - Three-dimensional Pedestrian-oriented §n signs compliment facades, Source: Duany Plater-Zyberk letter, symbols, and/or ornamental figures made of wood or metal. (3) Custom Neon - Exterior-mounted on a signboard or metal support frame or enclosure, or interior- mounted behind clerestory or display windows for only building-mounted signs. (4) Fabdc Awnings - such as canvas or nylon, with painted or applied lettering. Plastic awnings should not be used. (d) Colors - Dark colored backgrounds on signs are generally encouraged. Stark white or extremely bdght background colors such as bright red, orange or yellow are discouraged. iii. Sign Programs (a) Sign programs shall be designed to complement the style, color and materials of the building. The background color, type style, print and color of the sign should be consistent. (b)The signs may be located on individual storefronts, over display windows and at entdes and should be part of master sign program for the entire building/complex. iv. Siqn Li~]htinq (a) Recommended lighting approaches are: (1) Internal Lighting- Back-lit (halo-lit, or reverse pan channel) lighting inside and behind projecting lettering and/or awnings are highly encouraged for both office and retail use. Face illuminated individual channel letters may be appropriate for retail use. Crossroads Area Streetscape PIan 135 (2) External Lighting - Lighting shall be placed so that the light source is screened from direct view by passersby, and does not shine into adjacent property or blind motorists and pedestrians. No direct off-site glare from a light source shall be visible above three (3) feet at a public right-of-way. (3) Lighting Adjacent to Residential Areas - Where signs face residential areas, signs shall be the minimum size necessary and shall be of a Iow level of brightness (e.g. halo-lit letters). In cases where the sign facing residences is a secondary sign, lighting shall not be allowed. H. Lighting i. Sidewalk and Streetliqhts - See Streetscape Plan for details for streetlight standards. ii. Lighting in Private Developments (a) Lighting for buildings and open space should be coordinated as part of an overall lighting scheme. (b) Where the lighting scheme is adjacent to the sidewalk, it should be compatible (design, color, lighting, etc.) to the recommended street light standards. (c) Glare into residential units should be minimized through location and direction of lighting. 361 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan iMPLEMENTATiON The implementation section provides actions required, both by the public and private sectors to achieve the vision for the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan. A. Regulatory Framework The Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan is a policy plan since it guides future development in the planning area and establishes community expectations of a high-quality, pedestrian-oriented shopping district. The Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan shall be a part of the Heart of the City Specific Plan. Its land use map and development standards will be incorporated into the General Plan for properties within its boundary. The Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan shall be implemented through the City's processes for Use Permits, Architectural and Site Approvals, Subdivision Maps and other required applications as delineated in the City's Municipal Code. Upon adoption of the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan, all future rezoning, tentative subdivision maps, and public works projects must be consistent with the Heart of the City Specific plan as required by state law. B. Applicability The Specific Plan shall apply to all development of properties (including remodeling, additions, new construction, subdivisions, etc.) in the Crossroads Village Plan area as follows: i. New development shall be consistent with all elements of the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan including installation of streetscape elements (sidewalks, street trees, street furniture, etc.). New development shall be defined as a twenty- five percent (25%) or greater increase in floor area or a twenty-five percent (25%) or greater change in floor area resulting from use permit or architectural and site approval within twelve (12) months. Projects involving additions, change of use and remodels not qualifying as new development shall be consistent with the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan, except that the streetscape plan shall be implemented as it may apply to the project plans. C. Streetscape Improvements Implementation of the Streetscape Plan is expected to occur as follows: · Pdvate sector improvements include sidewalks, streetlights, street trees and street fumiture as properties redevelop in the study area. · Public sector improvements including median landscaping and crosswalk enhancements. · The City will work with property owners to redesign existing property frontages to be consistent with the Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan. D. Phasing The Streetscape Plan will be implemented as follows: · Phase 1: As private redevelopment occurs, the following shall be installed and maintained by private development. v' Replace bus duck-outs with curb-side stops. Curb lane Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan [ 37 shall be 22 feet minimum (including 12-foot parking/bike lane and 10-foot right lane) per VTA standards. ¢ Changes to bus stop locations shall be made in consultation with the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). ¢' Sidewalk Improvements. - Per Streetscape Plan. Includes bulb-outs at intersections and driveway entdes, sidewalk paving, landscaping and street furniture including tree grates, benches, trash receptacles, bike racks, and street lights. ,/' Public Art- Opportunities for installing public art shall be explored in conjunction with new development, or through public or public/private partnerships. The following improvements shall be implemented and maintained with the help of public funds, private development, a combination of the two or by the creation of an improvement district: ,/' On-street Parking- Stdping and road construction for parallel on-street parking on Stevens Creek Boulevard and side streets shall be provided per the Streetscape Plan. · / Crosswalks- Pedestrian crosswalks at intersections shall be constructed in a different matedal (pavers, stamped/scored concrete, stamped asphalt) to differentiate them from vehicle lanes. · / Median Redesign- Medians will be planted with trees/landscaping per the Streetscape Plan. Phase I1: The following improvements shall be implemented with the help of public funds, private development, a 381 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plar~ combination of the two, or by the creation of an improvement district: v' Undergrounding power lines in the median along Stevens Creek Boulevard from west of the Stelling Road intersection to De Anza Boulevard. ¢' Undergrounding of utility boxes and transformer equipment in sidewalks and at intersections. ¢' Enhance opportunities for public transit (light rail, rapid transit) in conjunction with the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). EXIBITS BEGIN HERE North Face of De Anza Parking Structure as seen from 20 ft away, looking south with Stevens Ck.. Blvd. behind you. Only 1st deck is visible. Observed height is definitely less than half of the height limits (36 ft. & 45 ft.) for the proposed tall buildings in the plan. There are other levels; but 2nd deck is set back, and not seen. East Face toward Flint Center Height of 2nd deck is a little more than half of proposed height limit of 45 ft. Note that the railing is 3.5 ft. What about railings (or AC units, etc.) on the proposed tall buildings? 1:1 slope 2:1 slope Structure of the stairwell & elevator tower can be an example of the size for the proposed tall buildings 46 ft. 2 in. 38 ft. Multiple Height View of De Anza Parking seen from Flint Center, looking toward the west Looking West on South Side of Stevens Creek Small Building Located Close to the Street What would it look like with a proposed building 0 ft. from the curb? Before and After Comparison ~ same scale Wouldn't it be nicer have a street where the trees, mountains, and sky are visible? Will the Development of Cupertino Follow the Plan? March 18, 1987 .PlaZa Park? City Council March 3, 2003 GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Crossroads Area Streetscape- Planning Area Reduce the 35-foot setback to 20 feet. Implement a streetscape with street furniture, lighting,street trees and on-street parking along Stevens Creek Boulevard. Active retail on the ground floor along Stevens Creek Boulevard Decrease building heights from three to two stories to the rear of properties and allow more flexibility for building heights (an increase from 45 feet to 55 feet) in the front half of properties. Possible development RESIDENT CONCERNS Density of developments. Tall buildings. Blocking view of mountains. Increased traffic. Streets difficult to cross for children going to school. Alternative locations- side streets, Vallco, Oaks. 20-foot sidewalk too narrow. Making the area walkable would impact traffic. RESIDENT IDEAS Like goals. Favor attractive, walkable area. Have design guidelines for development of all commercial areas. Add landscape elements and trees. Keep heights in existing Heart of the City Plan. Remove one lane in each direction. Create pedestrian mall, plaza, park for people to gather. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION On February 10, 2003' the Planning Commission recommended approval (3-1) of the changes required to implement the Crossroads Plan without the proposed increase in heights. Existing Heart of the City Building Envelope ¼ depth of property depth of property 20-ft. sidewalk Eastbound Stevens Creek Boulevard Original: Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Existing Heart of the City Building Envelope x~ Typical single-family ,, ~ on Scofield Drive ' ! ¼ depth of -- property 20-ft. sidewalk Heights recommended by the Planning Commission Eastbound Stevens Creek Boulevard PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Based on the Planning Commission's recommendation on February 10, 2003, the Crossroads Plan would require: General Plan Amendment- Allow portions of buildings to extend into the 1:1 slope line. Heart of the City Amendment- Reducing setbacks and landscape/sidewalk easement from 35 feet to 20 feet. COUNCIL MEETING- FEBRUARY 18, 2003 On February 18, 2003, the City Council: · Evaluated delaying the Crossroads Plan and decided to proceed with the scheduled March 3, 2003 public hearing. · Some members expressed an interest in allowing the Bottegas retail building to proceed ahead independently. RECOMMENDATION Option A. Approve the Crossroads Plan as recommended by the Planning Commission. Option B. Delay the schedule for the Crossroads Plan (4-6 months) and evaluate it as part of the General Plan. Option C. A rove an amended Crossroads Plan that is consistent with the General Plan as discussed below. OPTION C Increase the width of the proposed landscape and sidewalk strip from 20 feet to 25 feet. · Keep primary building bulk within a 1:1 slope from curb & reduce building heights at the 25- foot setback line to 25 feet (2 stories). Existing Heart of the City Building Envelope ~. Typical single-family on Scofield Brive BUILDING ENVELOPE eeee 1:1 slope from · ~ curb 45' .~--¼de property 20-ft. sidewalk Heights recommended by the Planning Commission Eastbound Stevens Creek Boulevard Existing Heart of the City Building Envelope x~ Typical single-family on Scofield Drive slope from eeee,~ :1 curb Eastbound Stevens Boulevard ¼ depth of property Heights- Option C 25-ft. sidewalk Existing Hypothetical Existing Hypothetical OPTION C- AMENDMENTS Based on the Option C, the Crossroads Plan would require: · No General Plan Amendment. Heart of the City Amendment- Reducing landscape/sidewalk easement from 35 feet to 25 feet. OPTION A Approve the Negative Declaration, EA-2002-01; 2. Approve the General Plan amendment, file number GPA-2002-05, in accordance with the Planning Commission Resolution No. 6173; and 3. Approve. the amendment to the Heart of the City Specific Plan, file number SPA-2002-01, in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 6174. OPTION B 1. Remove item from calendar. 2. Heart of the City amendment will be rescheduled in 4-6 months following the General Plan discussion. 3. Bottegas applicant will re-file application upon completion of the General Plan. OPTION C 1. Approve the Negative Declaration, EA-2002-01; 2. Approve the amendment to the Heart of the City Specific Plan, file number SPA-2002-01, per Option C. City Council March 3, 2003 GPA-2002-05, SPA-2002-01 Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan EXIBITS END HERE CITY CUPE INO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department SUMMARY AGENDA NO. I ~' AGENDA DATE March 3, 2003 SUMMARY: Consider amendments to Chapter 19.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code and other sections of the code, if needed, related to changes to Single-Family Residential regulations. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Approve the Negative Declaration, EA-2002-15; 2. Approve modifications to the Single Family Residential Design Guidelines; 3. Approve the Model Ordinance. DISCUSSION: Initiation In 1999, the City Council approved new regulations in the RI Zoning District to address the mass and bulk of new construction. The City Council asked that the new regulations be reviewed to gauge their effects and refine the ordinance as necessary. On July 24, 2000, as part of the first review of the R1 ordinance amendment, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 6045 (Minute Order) directing staff to make modifications to the R1 ordinance. The City Council enacted an R1 ordinance amendment on January 16, 2001, which addressed most of the Planning Commission's recommendations. One issue was raised by the Planning Commission, but was not reviewed at the City Council level. That was the direction from the Planning Commission to staff to amend the maximum entry height from 14 feet to 12 feet and the single-story building envelope wall height from 12 feet to 10 feet. Staff believed at the time that the design guidelines would sufficiently address the taller heights, and the issue was not presented to the City Council. By mid-2002, staff had observed that applicants had been frustrated by the relationship between the heights allowed by the ordinance and the heights that MCA-2002-03 Page 2 resulted from the application of the design guidelines. In August of 2002, staff reintroduced the Commission's recommendation and began work on an ordinance amendment. Informal Direction Staff also received comments from City Councilmembers that single-story homes with basements should be allowed larger lightwells, as well as comments from the Planning Commission that covenants should be recorded regarding privacy planting. These comments are part of the Model Ordinance. Proposed Changes Staff took this opportunity to reorganize and reword the regulations affecting single-family development, as well as proposing several minor changes listed below. The current Planning Commission reviewed the proposed changes, but did not agree with the former Commission's recommendation of lowering building heights. Thus, the height reduction is no longer in the Model Ordinance. SETBACKS 1. Modify the regulations regarding first-story side-setbacks on narrow lots to 5 feet on both sides, instead of 5 feet and 10 feet. 2. Increase the side-setback for side-facing garages (attached or detached) on corner lots to 20 feet from 12 feet. 3. Apply second-story-setback-surcharge to the side-yards abutting rear-yards of neighboring properties. PARKING 4. Allow tandem parking with an exception from the Design Review Committee, not the Planning Commission. 5. Allow parking of vehicles on semi-pervious surfaces. 6. Adjust limits on impervious and semi-pervious surfaces in the front yard area. PRIVACY 7. Require recordation of covenants for privacy planting. 8. Remove the details of privacy planting from the ordinance; instead provide it as a handout, to allow for easier updating. MISCELLANEOUS 9. Make minor changes to the Single Family Residential Design Guidelines (see attached Planning Commission staff report for details). 10.Allow single-story residences to have one larger lightwell of a 10' x 10' size. 11. Explicitly state that high-volume area in two-story homes count as second- story floor area. 12.Place limitations on the extension of legal non-conforming building lines. 13. Relocate second-story deck regulations from the Accessory Structure ordinance to the R1 Ordinance. MCA-2002-03 Page 3 PROCESS 14. Revise the processes for the review of single-family residential development to expedite non-controversial projects and increase public awareness for all two-story projects. a. Informal staff level review of single-story projects. Appeals heard by the Design Review Committee (DRC). b. Director's review for conforming two-story development up to a 45% FAR - notice adjacent neighbors with copies of plan set, story poles and posted notice on site. Appeals heard by the DRC. c. Design Review Committee (DRC) review for variations from the prescriptive regulations with new finding based on compatibility and/or superior design - notice neighbors within 300 feet, story poles and posted notice on site. Appeals heard by the Planning Commission. Planning Commission Discussion: The Planning Commission voted 3-1 to recommend approval of the Model Ordinance and revisions to the text of the Single Family Residential Design Guidelines. The Setback, Parking, Privacy and Miscellaneous changes (gl through #13) were part of staff's original recommendation to the Commission. The Process changes (#14) were added to address Commission concerns raised at the public hearing: 1. In certain situations, there are visual and privacy impacts related to new single-story development. There was discussion about reducing the maximum allowed heights for the single-story building envelope to address the impacts. Instead, the Commission agreed that limited staff review was preferred to address particular cases instead of changing the height regulations. This is the rationale for Item #14a. 2. Design review applications that conform to the prescriptive regulations but have FARs over 35% receive very little public comment at DRC meetings. By not having a hearing, the applicant can save time. This is the rationale for Item #14b. 3. The prescriptive regulations do not provide flexibility for superior designs. The current exception process is difficult. This is the rationale for Item #14c. The Commissioners stated that privacy impacts are significant until privacy planting matures, and directed staff to look at ways to reduce privacy impacts including taller fences or modifying the design of the house. Commissioner Wong was the dissenting vote at the Planning Commission. He stated that he was not in favor of the addition design review, and that too much discretion was given to the Director. MCA-2002-03 Page 4 Chairperson Chen and Commissioner Saadati were comfortable with the new review processes since appeal opportunities remained. Public Discussion: Nine members of the public spoke on this item. The major issues discussed were as follows: Concern that the 1999 R1 Ordinance Amendment was a response to massive two-story homes, but the result of the 1999 amendment was massive one-story homes. · Concern that the Commission not relax rules regarding two-story development. · Find ways to encourage developers who build homes with minimized impacts. · Concern that there are conflicts between the Single-Family Residential Guidelines and the R1 Ordinance. In many cases, the application of the guidelines does not allow something that is permitted by the R1 Ordinance. Pipelining Since the changes to the prescriptive regulations are minor, some being less restrictive, and the process changes are intended to be an overall improvement, staff does not recommend that projects be pipelined under the current regulations unless building permits are on file by the effective date of the model ordinance. Prepared by: Peter Gilli, Senior. Planner Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Approved by: l~avid W. Knal¥ City Manager Enclosures: Planning Commission Resolution No. 6172 Exhibit A: Model Ordinance Exhibit B: Model Text for Single Family Residential Desigm Guidelines Exhibit C: Negative Declaration Exhibit D: Comments received from public since Planning Commission hearing Exhibit E: Planning Commission Staff Report and enclosures, February 10, 2003 MCA-2002-03 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, Califomia 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6172 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND CHAPTERS 19.28, 19.80, 19.100 AND 14.18 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND REVISING THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES. Recommendation of approval is based on Exhibit A and Exhibit B as amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED this l0th day of February 2003 at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chen, Saadati, Corr COMMISSIONERS: Wong COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development /s/Angela Chen Angela Chen, Chairperson Planning Commission G: [PlanningkPDREPORI~pcMCAreports WICA-2002-03 PC Res.doc DRAFT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO, AMENDING CHAPTERS 19.28, 19.80, 19.100 AND 14.18 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. EXHIBIT A New concepts since ]anuary 13, 2003 are underlined. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Strike Chapter 19.28 in its entirety and replace with the following: Chapter 19.28 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RI) ZONES 19.28.010 19.28.020 19.28.030 19.28.040 19.28.050 19.28.060 19.28.070 19.28.090 19.28.100 19.28.110 19.28.120 19.28.130 19.28.140 Purposes. Applicability of regulations. Permitted uses. Conditional uses. General regulations. Development regulations. Development regulations - Eiehler (Rl-e). Landscape Requirements Second Story Decks Permitted yard encroachments. Discretionary design approval by the Director of Community Development. Discretionary design approval by the Design Review Committee. Interpretation by the Director of Community Development. 19.28.010 Purposes. R1 Single-Family Residential Districts are intended to create, preserve and enhance areas suitable for detached dwellings in order to: A. Enhance the identity of residential neighborhoods; B. Ensure provision of light, air and a reasonable level of privacy to individual residential parcels; C. Ensure a reasonable level of compatibility in scale of structures within residential neighborhoods; D. Reinforce the predominantly low-intensity setting in the community. Ordinance No. 1915 2 19.28.020 Applicability of regulations. No building, structure or land shall be used, and no building or structure shall be hereafter erected, structurally altered or enlarged in an R1 Single-Family Residential District other than in conformance with the provisions of this chapter and other applicable provisions of this title. 19.28.030 Permitted uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the R1 Single-Family Residential District: A. Single-family use; B. A second dwelling unit conforming to the provisions, standards and procedures described in Chapter 19.82, except for those second dwelling units requiring a conditional use permit; C. Accessory facilities and uses customarily incidental to permitted uses and otherwise conforming with the provisions of Chapter 19.80 of this title; D. Home occupations in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 19.92; E. Horticulture, gardening, and growing of food products for consumption by occupants of the site; F. Residential care facility that is licensed by the appropriate State, County agency or department with six or less residents, not including the provider, provider family or staff; G. Small-family day care home; H. The keeping of a maximum of four adult household pets, provided that no more than two adult dogs or cats may be kept on the site; I. Utility facilities essential to provision of utility services to the neighborhood but excluding business offices, construction or storage yards, maintenance facilities, or corporation yards; J. Large-family day care home, which meets the parking criteria contained in Chapter 19.100 and which is at least three hundred feet from any other large- family day care home. The Director of Community Development or his/her designee shall administratively approve large day care homes to ensure compliance with the parking and proximity requirements; K. Congregate residence with ten or less residents. 19.28.040 Conditional uses. The following uses may be conditionally allowed in the R1 Single-Family Residential District, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit: A. Issued by the Director of Community Development: 1. Temporary uses, subject to regulations established by Chapter 19.124; 2. Large-family day care home, which otherwise does not meet the criteria for a permitted use. The conditional use permit shall be processed as provided by Section 15.97.46(3) of the State of California Health and Safety Code; Ordinance No. 1915 3 3. Buildings or structures which incorporate solar design features that require variations from setbacks upon a determination by the Director that such design feature or features will not result in privacy impacts, shadowing, intrusive noise or other adverse impacts to the surrounding area; 4. Second dwelling units which require a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 19.84; 5. Home occupations requiring a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 19.92 of this title. B. Issued by the Planning Commission: 1. Two-story structures in an area designated for a one-story limitation pursuant to Section 19.28.060 E(2) of this chapter, provided that the Planning Commission determines that the structure or structures will not result in privacy impacts, shadowing, or intrusive noise, odor, or other adverse impacts to the surrounding area; 2.Group care activities with greater than six persons; 3. Residential care facility that is not required to obtain a license by the State, County agency or department and has six or less residents, not including the providers, provider family or staff; 4. Residential care facility that has the appropriate State, County agency or department license and seven or greater residents, not including the provider family or staff, is a minimum distance of five hundred feet from the property boundary of another residential care facility; 5. Residential care facility that is not required to obtain a license by the State, County agency or department and has seven or greater residents, not including the provider family or staff, is a minimum distance of five hundred feet from the property boundary of another residential care facility; 6. Congregate residence with eleven or more residents, which is a minimum distance of one thousand feet from the boundary of another congregate residence and has a minimum of seventy-five square feet of usable rear yard area per occupant. 19.28.050 General regulations. Lot Area Zoning Designations. 1. Minimum lot area shall correspond to the number (multiplied by one thousand square feet) following the R1 zoning symbol. Examples are as follows: Zoning Symbol Number Minimum Lot Area in Square Feet R1 5 5,000 R1 6 6,000 R1 7.5 7,500 R1 10 10,000 Ordinance No. 1915 4 2. Lots that have less area than required by Section 19.28.050 A(1), but not less than five thousand square feet, may nevertheless be used as building sites, provided that all other applicable requirements of this title are fulfilled. B. Lot Width. The minimum lot width shall be sixty feet measured at the front-yard setback line, except in the R1-5 district where the minimum lot width is fifty feet. C. Development on Slopes of Thirty Percent or Greater. 1. Site plans for all development proposals shall include topographical information at contour intervals not to exceed ten feet. Areas where slopes are thirty percent or greater shall be identified on the site development plan. 2. Buildings proposed on a portion of a lot with slopes of thirty percent or greater shall be developed in accordance with the site development and design standards specified in Sections 19.40.050 through 19.40.140 of the Residential Hillside ordinance, or Chapter 19.28, whichever specific regulation is more restrictive. 3. No structure or improvements shall occur on slopes of thirty percent or greater unless an exception is granted in accordance with Section 19.40.140, unless no more than five hundred square feet of development, including grading and structures, occurs on an area with a slope of thirty percent or greater. D. An application for building permit filed and accepted by the City (fees paid and control number issued) on or before [date to be determined at Cit~ Council meeting[ may proceed with application processing under the ordinances in effect at that time. 19.28.060 Development Regulations. A. Lot Coverage. The maximum lot coverage shall be forty-five percent of the net lot area. B. Floor Area Ratio. 1. The maximum floor area ratio of all structures on a lot shall be forty-five percent. 2. The maximum floor area of a second story shall be thirty-five percent of the existing or proposed first story floor area or six hundred square feet, whichever is greater. 3. Interior building area with floor to ceiling heights greater than fifteen feet shall be added to the second story floor area unless the house is single- story. C. Design Guidelines. 1. Any new house or addition to an existing house shall be generally consistent with the City's Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines. The Director of Community Development shall review new projects and Ordinance No. 1915 5 shall determine that the following items are met prior to issuance of building permits: a. The mass and bulk of the design shall be reasonably compatible with the predominant neighborhood pattern. New construction shall not be disproportionately larger than or out of scale with the neighborhood pattern in terms of building forms, roof pitches, eave heights, ridge heights, and entry feature heights; b. The design shall use vaulted ceilings rather than high exterior walls to achieve higher volume interior spaces; c. For projects with three-car garages oriented to the public right- of-way, the wall plane of the third space shall be set back a minimum of two feet from the wall plane of the other two spaces, or shall incorporate a tandem space. There shall not be a three- car wide driveway curb cut. 2. If the Director does not find that the proposal is generally consistent with this section, than an application must be made for design approval pursuant to Section 19.28.120. D. Design Review. 1. Any new two-story house, or second-story addition to an existing house, which conforms to the regulations in this chapter shall require discretionary design approval from the Director of Community Development pursuant to Section 19.28.120. 2. Any new house, or addition to an existing house, which does not conform to one or more of the regulations in Section 19.28.060 shall require discretionary design approval from the Design Review Committee pursuant to Section 19.28.130. E. Setback--First Story (Nonaccessory Structures). 1. Front Yard. The minimum front yard setback is twenty feet; provided, that for a curved driveway the setback shall be fifteen feet as long as there are no more than two such fifteen-foot setbacks occurring side by side. 2. Side Yard. At least one of two side yard setbacks must be no less than ten feet, with the other side yard setback no less than five feet, except as follows: a. The minimum side-yard setback for the street-side of a corner lot shall be twelve feet. The minimum interior side setback for a corner lot shall be five feet. b. The minimum side-yard setbacks for a lot with an average width less than sixty feet measured at the front and rear setback lines shall be five feet on each side yard. c. The minimum side-yard setback for a garage on the street-side of a corner lot shall be twenty feet. 3. Rear Yard. The minimum rear yard setback is twenty feet. The rear setback may be reduced to ten feet if, after the reduction, the usable rear yard area is at least twenty times the lot width as measured from the front setback line. Ordinance No. 1915 6 Setback--Second Floor (Nonaccessory Structures). 1. The minimum front and rear setbacks are twenty-five feet. 2. The minimum side setbacks are ten feet, except as follows: a. The minimum side setback from a street-side property line is twelve feet. b. The minimum side setback for a flag lot is twenty feet. 3. Setback Surcharge. An additional fifteen feet of second-story setback shall be required. a. The total surcharge shall be added to the front and side setbacks in any combination, except that at least five feet shall be applied to the second-story side setbacks. b. In the case of a side-yard adjacent to a rear yard of another single-family residential property, ten feet of the surcharge shall be applied to that side. 4. The visible height of second story walls is regulated as follows: a. Fifty percent of the total perimeter length of second story walls shall not have exposed wall heights greater than six feet, and shall have a minimum two-foot high overlap of the adjoining first story roof against the second floor wall. The overlap shall be structural and shall be offset a minimum of four feet from the first story exterior wall plane. Al mosl At Ieast 4,~,~ bo All visible second story wall heights are required to have building, wall offsets at least every twenty-four feet, with a minimum two-foot depth and six-foot width. The offsets shall comprise the full height of the wall plane. Ordinance No. 1915 7 less than 24' Second Floor Plan less than 24' · ~. 2'*0" min. loss than 24' c. All second story roofs shall have a minimum of one-foot eaves. G. Basements. l. The number, size and volume oflightwells, stairwells and basement windows and doors shall be the minimum required by the Uniform Building Code for emergency egress, light and ventilation, except as permitted by this section. 2. Maximum size ora lightwell or stairwell for a basement: a. Length, as measured parallel to the basement wall, may be one foot more than the minimum width ora basement door or window providing light, air and ventilation to the basement. In the case of a stairwell, this regulation applies to the length of the landing. b. Width, as measured perpendicular between the basement wall and the lightwell or stairwell retaining wall, shall be three feet. c. In the case of a single-story house, one lightwell or stairwell may have a length and width often feet. 3. Setbacks. No part of a basement, stairwell or lightwell retaining wall may encroach into the following setbacks: a. The minimum front setback shall be twenty feet; b. The minimum side setback shall be five feet; c. The minimum rear setback shall be ten feet. 4. No part of a basement, stairwell or lightwell retaining wall may encroach into the drip line of a specimen tree or required privacy tree. H. Height. 1. The maximum building height of any principal dwelling shall be twenty- eight feet, not including fireplace chimneys, antennae or other appurtenances. 2. The maximum exterior wall height and building height of single-story structures and single-story sections of two-story structures shall fit into a building envelope defined by: Ordinance No. 1915 8 a. A twelve-foot high vertical line measured from natural grade and located at the side-setback line; b. A twenty-five-degree roof line angle projected inward at the twelve-foot high line referenced in Section 19.28.060 H(2)(a). c. Notwithstanding the above, a gable end of a roof may have a maximum wall height of eighteen feet to the peak of the roof as measured from natural grade. Se~t~c:k 3. Areas Restricted to One Story. The City Council may prescribe that all buildings within a designated area be limited to one story in height (not exceeding eighteen feet) by affixing to the R1 zoning district, the designation "i" provided, however, that the limitation may be removed through use permit approval, as provided in Section 19.28.040 B by the Planning Commission. 4. The maximum entry feature height, as measured from natural grade to the top of the wall plate, shall be fourteen feet. Top of ~ Plate ~ Feature[ Finish ~ Grade Ordinance No. 1915 9 Additional Site Requirements. 1. No blank single-story side walls longer than sixteen feet shall face a public right-of-way without at least one of the following: a. At least one offset with a minimum two-foot depth and six-foot width; the offset shall comprise the full height of the wall plane; b. Window of at least thirty inches by thirty inches; c. Entry feature leading to a door; d. Trellis with landscape screening. 2. Accessory Buildings/Structures. Chapter 19.80 governs setbacks, coverage and other standards for accessory structures. 3. Parking and Front-Yard Paving. Chapter 19.100 governs parking and front-yard paving requirements. 19.28.070 Development re§ulations--Eichler (Rl-e). Rl-e Single-Family Residential Eichler Districts protect a consistent architectural form through the establistunent of district site development regulations. Regulations found in the other sections of this chapter shall apply to properties zoned Rl-e. In the event of a conflict between other regulations in this chapter and this section, this section shall prevail. Nothing in these regulations is intended to preclude a harmonious two-story home or second story addition. A. Setback--First StoW. The minimum front yard setback is twenty feet. B. Building Design Requirements. 1. Entry features facing the street shall be integrated with the roof line of the house. 2. The maximum roof slope shall be 3:12 (rise over run). 3. Wood or other siding material located on walls facing a public street (not including the garage door) shall incorporate vertical grooves, up to six inches apart. 4. The building design shall incorporate straight architectural lines, rather than curved lines. 5. Second stow building wall offsets described in Section 19.28.060 F(4)(b) are not required for homes in the Rl-e zone. 6. The first floor shall be no more than twelve inches above the existing grade. 7. Exterior walls located adjacent to side yards shall not exceed nine feet in height measured from the top of the floor to the top of the wall plate. C. Privacy Protection Requirements. 1. Side and Rear Yard Facing Second Floor Windows. In addition to other privacy protection requirements in Section 19.28.090, the following is required for all second story windows: a. Cover windows with exterior louvers to a height of six feet above the second floor; or b. Obscure glass to a height of six feet above the second floor; or c. Have a window sill height of five feet minimum above the second floor. Ordinance No. 1915 10 19.28.090 Landscape Requirements To mitigate privacy impacts and the visual mass and bulk of new two-story homes and additions, tree and/or shrub planting is required. The intent of this section is to provide substantial screening within three years of the planting. A. Applicability. This requirement shall apply to new two-story homes, second-story decks, two-story additions, or modifications to the existing second-story decks or existing windows on existing two-story homes that increase privacy impacts on neighboring residents. Skylights, windows with sills more than five feet above the finished second floor, windows with permanent, exterior louvers up to six feet above the finished second floor, and obscured, non-openable windows may not be required to provide privacy protection planting. B. Privacy Planting Plan. A building permit application for a new two-story house or a second story addition shall be accompanied by a privacy planting plan which identifies the location, species and canopy diameter of existing and proposed trees or shrubs. 1. New trees or shrubs shall be required on the applicant's property to screen views from second-story windows. The area where planting is required is bounded by a thirty-degree angle on each side window jamb. The trees or shrubs shall be planted prior to issuance of a final occupancy permit. a. New trees or shrubs are not required to replace existing trees or shrubs if an Internationally Certified Arborist or Licensed Landscape Architect verifies that the existing trees/shrubs have the characteristics of privacy planting species, subject to approval by the Director of Community Development. b. Affected property owner(s) may choose to allow privacy planting on their own property. In such cases, the applicant must plant the privacy screening prior to issuance of a building permit. Ordinance No. 1915 11 2. Waiver. These privacy mitigation measures may be modified in any way with a signed waiver statement from the affected property owner. Modifications can include changes to the number of shrubs or trees, their species or locations. C. Front-Yard Tree Planting. Applicants for new two-story homes and two-story additions must plant a tree in front of new second stories in the front yard setback area. The tree shall be 24 inch-box or larger, with a minimum height of six feet. The Director of Community Development can waive this front-yard tree if there is a conflict with existing mature tree canopies on-site or in the public right-of-way. D. Species List. The Planning Division shall maintain a list of allowed privacy planting trees and shrubs. The list shall include allowed plant species, minimum size of trees and shrubs, expected canopy or spread size, and planting distance between trees. E. Covenant. The property owner shall record a covenant with the Santa Clara County Recorders Office that requires the retention of new privacy planting, or use of existing vegetation as privacy planting, prior to receiving a final building inspection from the Building Division. This regulation does not apply to situations described in Section 19.28.090 B(1)(b). F. Maintenance. The required plants shall be maintained. Landscape planting maintenance includes irrigation, fertilization and pruning as necessary to yield a growth rate expected for a particular species. G. Replacement. Where required planting is removed or dies it must be replaced within thirty days with privacy tree(s) of similar size as the tree(s) being replaced, unless it is determined to be infeasible by the Director of Community Development. 19.28.100 Second Story Decks All new or expanded second story decks with views into neighboring residential side or rear yards are must obtain an discretionary approval in accordance with Section 19.28.120 in order to protect the privacy of adjoining properties. The goal of the exception requirement is not to require complete visual protection but address privacy protection to the greatest extent while still allowing the construction and use of an outdoor deck. This section applies to second-story decks, patios, balconies, or any other similar unenclosed features. A. A second-story deck or patio may encroach three feet into the front setback for the principal dwelling. B. The minimum side-yard setback shall be fifteen feet. C. The minimum rear-yard setback shall be twenty feet. 19.28.110 Permitted yard encroachments. A. Where a building legally constructed according to existing yard and setback regulations at the time of construction encroaches upon present required side-yard setbacks: Ordinance No. 1915 12 1. One encroaching wall may be extended along its existing building lines, for a maximum distance of fifteen feet, as long as the extension or addition does not further encroach into the required setback and the height of the extended wall is not increased. 2. Only one such extension shall be permitted for the life of such building. 3. The extension or addition may not further encroach into any required setback. 4. In no case may the wall plane be located closer than three feet to any property line. 5. This section applies to the first story only and shall not be construed to allow the further extension of an encroachment by any building, which is the result of the granting of a variance, either before or after such property become part of the City. Architectural Features (not including patio covers) may extend into a required yard a distance'not exceeding three feet; provided that no architectural feature, or combination thereof, whether a portion of a principal or accessory structure may extend closer than three feet to any property line. 19.28.120 Discretionarg design approval by the Director of Communit~ Development. Discretionary design review is required for all conforming two-story development in the R1 zone. The applicant shall submit a complete application to the Director of Community Development for design approval to allow the new development. A. Prior to the acceptance of a design review application, the applicant shall: 1. Install story poles to outline the proposed building exterior walls and roof for all two-story development as described by procedures developed by the Director of Community Development. 2. Install a public notice in the front yard of the subiect site that is clearly visible from the public street. B. Public Notice. Upon receipt of a complete application for design review, the Director of Community Development shall order the public notice of the received application. The notice shall be sent by first-class mail to all owners of record of real property (as shown in the last tax assessment roll) that are adjacent to the subiect property. 1. The notice shall contain the following: a. The exact address of the property, if known, or the location of the property, if the address is not known; b. A brief description, the content of which shall be in the sole discretion of the City, of the proposed proiect; c. The name and contact information for the staff person assigned to the proiect; d. A reduced-scale copy of the proposed plan set; e. Reference to the application on file for particulars; f. A date by which all comments concerning the proiect must be submitted to the Community Development Department. This date t .t7 Ordinm~ce No. 1915 13 shall be no less than fourteen calendar days from the mailing of the notice; g. A statement that any interested person, or agent thereof, may submit comments concerning the project. 2. Compliance with the notice provisions set forth in this section shall constitute a good-faith effort to provide notice, and the failure to provide notice, and the failure of any person to receive notice, shall not prevent the City from proceeding to consider or take action with respect to an application under this chapter. 3. Typographical errors in the notice shall not invalidate the notice nor any City action related to the notice. C. Design Review Decision. The Director may approve a design review application if all of the following findings are made: 1. The proiect is consistent with the Cupertino General Plan and Title 19 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 2. The granting of this permit will not result in detrimental or iniurious conditions to property or improvements in the vicinity, or to the public health, safety or welfare. 3. The project is generally compatible with the established pattern of building forms, building materials and designs of homes in the neighborhood. 4. The project is generally consistent with the City's single-family residential design guidelines. 5. Significant adverse visual impacts as viewed from adjoining properties have been mitigated to the maximum extent possible. D. Second Story Deck Decision. The Director may approve a second-story deck application if all of the following findings are made: 1. The deck design decreases privacy impacts by minimizing the sensitive views into adjoining yards to the greatest extent possible. 2. The deck design is compatible with the architectural style of the primary structure. E. Notice of Action. The Director shall render his decision in writing, stating reasons thereof. Notice of the action shall be mailed to the applicant, adjacent property owners, and any member of the public who commented on the project, the Planning Commission and the City Council. F. Appeal. Interested party may appeal the action of the Director subject to Chapter 19.136, except that the Design Review Committee will hear the appeal. G. Expiration. A decision for approval which has not been used within one year following the effective date thereof, shall become null and void and of no effect unless a shorter time period shall specifically be prescribed by the conditions of design approval. 1. An approval shall be deemed to have been used when a complete building permit application is submitted to the Chief Building Official, and continues to progress in a diligent manner. In the event that the building permit application expires, the design approval shall become null and void. Ordinance No. 1915 14 2. The Director of Community Development may grant a single one-year extension without public notice and hearing upon the receipt of a written request iustifying the extension. H. Concurrent Applications. Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter to the contrary, an application for design review may, at the discretion of the Director of Community Development, be processed concurrently with other land use approvals. 19.28.130 Discretionary design review by the Design Review Committee. Where results inconsistent with the purpose and intent of this chapter result from the strict application of the provisions hereof, exceptions to Sections 19.28.060, 19.28.070 and 19.28.090 may be granted as provided in this section. A. Procedures for discretionary design review by the Design Review Committee shall be based on Section 19.28.120 except that: 1. The public notice shall be to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. 2. Reduced-scale plan sets may be excluded in the notice. 3. In lieu of a date for the submittal of comments, the notice will have a date, time and location for a public hearing. 4. In addition to the findings listed in Section 19.28.120 C, the Design Review Committee must make the following findings: a. The flexibility from the literal enforcement of the prescriptive regulations in Section 19.28.060 results in a proiect whose design is superior to a conforming project and improves the compatibility of the project to the established neighborhood pattern of building forms, designs and building materials. B. Variation from the following sections of this chapter shall require a Variance pursuant to Chapter 19.124. 1. Section 19.28.060 B(1) and B(3). 2. Section 19.28.060 D(1). 3. Section 19.28.060 F. 19.28.140 Interpretation by the Director of Community Development. The Director of Community Development shall be empowered to make reasonable interpretations of the regulations and provisions of this chapter consistent with the legislative intent thereof. Any interested party may appeal an interpretation by the Director of Community Development. The Planning Commission will hear the appeal. Iff-lq Ordinance No. 1915 15 Proposed text is underlined. Deleted text is struck through. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Chapter 19.80 (Accessory Buildings/Structures) is amended as follows: 19.80.030 Site development regulations. General Regulations. Except as otherwise provided in this section, accessory buildings shall at all times be located in conformance with requirements for principal buildings, and shall not be located in any required front, sides, or rear yard setback area. A. Residential and Agricultural Zones. In residential and agricultural zoning districts, accessory buildings and structures may be located in a required interior yard, subject to the following restrictions: 1. With respect to accessory buildings and structures (including decks and patios) which are attached to principal dwellings, all site development regulations, including setbacks, height and lot coverage regulations applicable to principal dwellings in the applicable zone also govern attached accessory buildings/structures except as otherwise specified below: a. Ground level paving, landscape features, lightwells, stairwells leading to a basement, and open recreational facilities are excluded from lot coverage regulations, c. :F-hey Attached accessory buildings/structures shall be structurally integrated with the principal dwelling, d. Unenclosed patio covers may extend as close as ten feet to the rear property line, e. Attached recreational structures which have a floor or step height greater than eighteen inches above any point of the adjoining finished grade, must have a minimum setback of ten feet from any property line, f. In agricultural'zoning districts attached accessory buildings/structures which are used solely for agricultural uses are not restricted as to height, provided that such buildings/structures are of a design and height usual for that purpose. g. First-floor decks and patios, other than described in subsection Ble of this section, may encroach to within three feet ora property line, h. First-floor decks and patios may encroach three feet into front- yard setbacks, / 5'-zO Ordinance No. 1915 16 j. Second story decks in R1 R 1 zoning districts are regulated by Section 19.28.100 With respect to detached accessory buildings/structures (including an R2 R 2 zoning district): a. In R 1 R1, RHS, A andA 1 A1 zones: i. The area of an accessory building/structure, not including garage space, shall be limited to the gross building area as per Section 19.84.030 D. ii. Basements in detached accessory buildings/structures shall count as floor area, and shall be subject to the regulations in. Easement l~gh+;::el!s z~.all ccnf~rm to Section 19.28.060 F. iii. Detached accessory buildings with living space shall conform to Chapter 19.84. b. The maximum lot coverage is thirty percent of the useable rear yard area; c. The minimum distance from a principal dwelling is five feet (measured between the eaves); d. Small, portable storage buildings and air conditioning units less than six feet in height, which are not attached to a building, permanent foundation, or pad, may be located closer than five feet to a principal dwelling, but no closer than three feet from any property line; e. No detached accessory building or structure shall be located less than three feet from any property line; f. Detached accessory buildings and structures shall be limited to a single story and shall not exceed a height of seven feet beginning at a three-foot setback from rear or side property lines. The height encompasses the entire wall plane nearest the property line, including the roof, eaves, and any portion of the foundation visible above the adjoining finished grade. The wall plane height may be increased by one foot for each additional one and one- half feet of setback (corresponding to a thirty-three-degree angle), up to a maximum wall plane height of fifteen feet, as depicted in the diagram attached to the ordinance codified in this Ordinance No. 1915 17 title. The maximum height of construction shall not exceed twenty feet; g. Walls which are less than five feet to a property line may not have windows or if windows are installed they must be obscured glass or have the sill height above five feet from the floor. This requirement shall not apply to skylight or windows which face a right-of-way or a nonresidential zoning district; h. Detached recreational buildings/structures which have a floor or step height greater than eighteen inches above any point at the adjoining finished grade, must have a setback often feet from any property. An affixed play structure, such as a swing or climbing apparatus, is allowed in the setback area if it is at least three feet from the property line and if it exceeds the heights and setbacks as required in subsections B2b and c of this section and meets one of the two following conditions: It is adjacent to a corner property line, or, if not on a corner, the immediately adjacent property owner agrees to the location prior to construction; i. The minimum front-yard setbacks for detached accessory buildings/structures are: i. Twenty feet in residential zones; ii. Thirty feet in agricultural zones. j. With respect to corner lots, the street-side yard setback shall be fifteen feet, exce : ................................... no less i. Twenty feet in the event that the corner lot is adiacent to a key lot; ii. Twenty feet for a garage or carport. k. In R2 and R3 R 2 ~,md R 2 zones, in the case of an interior lot abutting only one street, no detached accessory building or structure, except a detached garage, may occupy the front fifty percent of the lot area. ..... ~ ....... .~ .................... pr:racy Ordinance No. 1915 18 19.80.050 Interpretation by the Director of Community Development. The Director of Community Development shall be empowered to make reasonable interpretations of the regulations and provisions of this chapter consistent with the legislative intent thereof. Any interested party may appeal an interpretation by the Director of Community Development. The Planning Commission will hear the appeal. Ordinance No. 1915 19 Chapter 19.100 Parking Regulations is amended as follows 19.100.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate and to regulate parking of vehicles that are unsightly, oversized, or are detrimental to property values or the peace and enjoyment of neighboring property owners or residents establish regulations pertaining to the design and number of off-street parking spaces for land use activities located in various zoning districts. 19.100.020 Application of regulations. A. No vehicle may be parked, stored or kept on any parcel of land within the City of Cupertino otherwise than in conformance with the provisions of this chapter. B. Buildings, structures and land uses are required to provide off-street parking in conformance with this chapter. The standards and regulations contained in this chapter regulate off-street parking for conventional zoning districts and are intended also as guidelines for development projects located in planned development (PD) zones and at congregate residences and residential care facilities. 19.100.030 Regulations for parking and keeping vehicles in various zones. A. Vehicles Permitted in Residential Zones. 1. Front or Street Side Setback Area. Vehicles are permitted to be placed, kept or parked in a front or street side yard setback area (as defined in Chapter 19.08.030 of this title) or within twelve feet of a public right-of- way in a rear yard area in all residential zones subject to the following restrictions: a. A maximum of four vehicles are permitted on a lot in residential zone requiring a lot size of ten thousand square feet or less, a maximum of six vehicles are permitted in all other residential zones, unless a greater number is approved by the City in conjunction with a development plan. For purposes of counting vehicles, a camper mounted on a pickup truck is considered one vehicle and other similarly vertically stacked components which belong together shall be counted as a single vehicle. Horizontal groupings shall be counted as two vehicles; b. Any open vehicle containing trash or debris is prohibited; c. No portion of any vehicle may overhang any public right-of-way; d. All vehicles must be parked on an impervious or semi-pervious surface. Semi-pervious surfaces include unit pavers, turf block, brick, natural stone or cobbles and must allow for partial infiltration of water. Impervious surfaces include concrete, asphalt or any other surfaces that do not allow infiltration of water. Impervious surfaces may not exceed forty percent of the front yard area. The combination of impervious and semi- pervious surfaces may not exceed sixty percent of the front yard area ..... -- ~- Ordinance No. 1915 20 ............. r ....... r ......... ~ ....... s .... r ....... s~ ce must be contiguous ~d, at a minimum, encompass ~e outline of the vehicle. e. All vehicles must be c~ently registered, where registration is required for legal operation ~d in good operating condition; f. Except on lots with circul~ driveways which confo~ to the provisions of this code, all vehicles parked in the front or street side yard setback area must be p~ked pe~endicul~ to the street. On lots with circul~ driveways which conform to the provisions of this code, all vehicles parked in the front or street side y~d setback area are limited to less than twenty feet in length, unless parked pe~endicular to ~e street. Owners of vehicles made nonconfo~ing by the adoption of this section shall comply with this provision within two ye~s of its enactment. 2. ~ea Outside of Front or Street Side Setback Areas. Vehicles ~e pe~itted to be placed, kept, or p~ked in ~y yard ~ea, excluding those yard areas regulated by Section 11.29.040 Al, provided a t~ee-foot minimm cle~ce is maintained to any st~cture. 3. P~king Within Structures. Vehicles ~e pe~itted to be placed, kept or p~ked in ~y legal st~cture, provided that no more th~ one required enclosed p~king space is occupied by a vehicle not capable of being propelled under its o~ power. 4. Non-Self-Propelled Vehicles. A maximin of two vehicles not capable of being propelled ~der their o~ power ~e pe~itted to be placed, kept or parked outside a legal st~cture on a lot. 5. Living or Sleeping Quaaers. No vehicle shall be used for living or sleeping queers, except as pe~iRed below: a. Vehicles located in a mobilehome p~k and used consistent with ~y City regulations applicable to mobilehome parks ~e permiaed; b. Trailers, campers or recreational vehicles may be used by a bona fide guest of a City resident for a period not to exceed seventy- two hours where the trailer, camper or recremional vehicle is located on the resident's propeay. 6. Mobilehomes. Mobilehomes, excluding travel trailers, ~e not permiaed within the residenti~ zones of the City, except in a mobilehome p~k or as provided by State law. B. Vehicles Permitted in No~esidential Zones. 1. P~king must be consistent with allowed uses in the zone. It is unlawful for any person to place, keep or maintain or permit to be placed, kept or maintained, any vehicle upon ~y lot, place or p~cel of land within the no~esidential zones of~e City, except for storage, sale or business use as pe~iaed in such zones. Ordinance No. 1915 21 2. Construction Trailers. Trailers may be used for temporary offices on construction sites provided that a permit is obtained from the City Building Department after satisfactory information has been given that the use is in compliance with the conditions of this chapter. C. Loading and Unloading and Utility Vehicles. The provisions of this chapter are inapplicable to active loading or unloading of m~y vehicle or to any public service or utility company vehicles while in the performance of service or maintenance work. D. Parking on Vacant Lots. No vehicle may be parked, kept, or stored upon any vacant or unimproved parcel within the City. E. Other parking regulations shall be as outlined in Title 11 of the Municipal Code. 19.100.040 Regulations for off-street parking. A. Parking Ratio and Dimension. Table 19.100.040-A defines the required number of parking spaces by size and type for specific zoning districts and use within zoning districts. B. Aisle Dimensions. Aisle dimension shall be as required by standard details adopted by the City Engineer and shown in Table 19.100.040-B. C. Loading Areas. Loading areas, track parking spaces, and parking spaces: for vehicles other than automobiles shall have ample dimensions for the particular use and type of operation, and be designed or required by the City Engineer. D. Planned Development Districts. The parking requirement contained in Table 19. i 00.040-A functions as guidelines for projects in planned development zoning districts. Within such districts, the Planning Commission, or City Council may approve a development plan which deviates from Table 19.100.040-A requirements if an applicant provides a parking study which supports said deviation. E. Mixed-Use Projects Where more than one of the activities specified in Table 19.100.040-A is initiated in a building or on a site not requiring review by any committee, commission, or the City Council, the Director of Community Development shall determine the total parking requirement based upon the application of parking requirements for individual uses as described in Table 19.100.040-A. F. Shared Parking. 1. For proposed land uses which are less than or equal to five thousand square feet of commercial; ten thousand square feet of office and eight or less units of residential, a special parking study will not be required if all of the following may be demonstrated: a. The land use consists of a shopping center, office or industrial development which is owned or managed by a single entity; b. The land uses are under single management and in close proximity to each other and are served by a common parking facility; c. The proposed shared parking plan may be approved in conjunction with a conditional use permit application in a Ordinance No. 1915 22 planned development zone or via an exception for a project which is not located in a planned development zone. d. The parking provided either meets or exceeds the standards for shared parking as described in Table 19.100.040-C. e. The shared parking plan is valid only as long as the mix of uses and their corresponding square footage (or seas/employees for restaurants) is the same as originally approved. 2. For all land uses not meeting the criteria set forth in subsection F1 of this section, the Planning Commission or City Council may approve a shared parking plan for a particular project whereby a parking space is utilized to serve two or more individual land uses under the following conditions: a. The land use consists of a shopping center, office or industrial development which is owned or managed by a single entity; b. The land use under single management are in close proximity to each other and are served by a common parking facility; c. The applicant has submitted a detailed parking study which demonstrates that the proposed use is compatible with the proposed parking supply. d. The proposed shared parking plan may be approved in conjunction with a conditional use permit application in a plmmed development zone or via an exception for a project which is not located in a planned development zone. Tandem, Valet and Other Special Parking Arrangements. Tandem, valet, and other special forms of parking may be approved in conjunction with a conditional use permit in a planned development zone or via an exception for a project not in a planned development zone. Minimum Stall Dimension in Parking Structure. The minimum stall dimension for a standard space located in a parking garage or other enclosed parking structure and intended for nonresidential uses is nine feet by eighteen feet. The minimum dimensions for a similarly situated compact space are eight feet by fifteen feet six inches. Handicapped Parking. The handicapped parking requirement embodied in Section 1129 B of the California Building Code, as amended, is hereby incorporated into this chapter by reference. Other regulations shall be as outlined in Title 11 of the Municipal Code. Residential Lots Fronting on Public or Private Streets. If no on-street parking is available, two additional c .... c..~+;^.~,,.. ;_a .... a~., · ................. ~ ..... v ........ off-street spac-~s-m ............. -~ ............. v ...... required. Farm Equipment. For tractors or farm equipment which are regularly parked on- site within two hundred feet of a public street or road, such parking places shall be screened from sight of the street. Large-Family Day Care Home. A minimum of one parking space per nonresident employee is required. This parking requirement shall be in addition to the minimum requirements of the zoning district. The parking space may be on-street, in front of the provider's residence. A minimum of one parking space shall be 1 -27 Ordinance No. 1915 23 available for child drop-off. The space shall provide direct access to the unit, not crossing a street. If the provider is relying on on-street parking and the roadway prohibits on-street parking, a semi-circular driveway may be provided, subject to other provisions of the Municipal Code. Landscape Requirements. All new centers and centers with a twenty-five percent or greater increase in floor area or a twenty-five percent or greater change in floor area resulting from use permit or architectural and site approval within twelve months shall be required to meet the following minimum landscape requirements; however, the Planning Commission and/or City Council may recommend additional landscaping. I. Each unenclosed parking facility shall provide a minimum of interior landscaping in accordance with the following table: Min. Required Size of Interior Landscaping (% of Parking Facility (Sq. Ft.) Total Parking Facility Area) Under 14,999 5% 15,000 - 29,999 7.5% 30,000 plus 10% 2. Parking lot trees shall be planted or exist at a ratio of one tree for every five to ten parking stalls. Only fifty percent of the trees located along the perimeter of the parking area may count towards the required number of trees. When considering the number of trees per parking stall, the factors such as size of tree and canopy size shall be considered. A parking facility incorporating large trees with high canopies may provide one tree for every ten spaces whereas a parking facility with small trees would provide one tree for every five spaces. 3. All trees shall be protected by curbing or bollards as appropriate. 4. All landscape shall be continuously maintained. C. Bicycle Parking. Bicycle parking shall be provided in multi-fanfily residential developments and in commercial districts. In commercial districts, bicycle parking shall be conveniently located and adjacent to on-site bicycle circulation pedestrian routes. The bicycle parking facilities shall be one of the following three classification types: 1. Class I Facilities. These facilities are intended for long-term parking and are intended to protect the entire bicycle or its individual components and accessories from theft. The facility also protects the cycle from inclement weather, including wind driven rain. The three design alternatives for Class I facilities are as follows: i. Bicycle Locker. A fully enclosed space accessible only by the owner or operator of the bicycle. Bicycle lockers must be fitted with key locking mechanisms. ii. Restricted Access. Class III bicycle parking facilities located within a locked room or locked enclosure accessible only to the Ordinance No. 1915 24 owners and operators of the bicycle. The maximum capacity of each restricted room shall be ten bicycles. In multiple family residential developments, a common locked garage area with Class II parking facilities shall be deemed restricted access provided the garage is accessible only to the residents of the units for whom the garage is provided. iii. Enclosed Cages. A fully enclosed chain link enclosure for individual bicycles, where contents are visible from the outside, which can be locked by a user provided lock. This facility may only be used for multiple family residential uses. 2. Class II Facilities. Intended for short term parking. A stationary object which the user can lock the frame and both wheels with a user provided lock. The facility shall be designed so that the lock is protected from physical assault. A Class II facility must accept U-shaped locks and padlocks. Class I! facilities must be within constant visual range of persons within the adjacent building or located at street floor level. 3. Class III Facilities. Intended for short-term parking. A stationary object to which the user may lock the frame and both wheels with a user provided cable or chain and lock. Spacing of the bicycle units shall be figured on a handlebar width of three feet, distance from bottom of wheel to top of handlebar of three feet and six inches and a maximum wheel-to-wheel distance of six feet. D. Parking Space Dimension Chart. Parking space dimensions shall be as shown in the following table: Table 19.100.040-A Land Use Residential Single-Family Single-Family Cluster Duplex Apartment Zones Parking Bicycle Bicycle Ratio Parking Parking (Gross Req. Class Square Feet) (8) Standard Percent Compact Dimensions Compacts Dimensions RI/RHS 4/DU (2 10 x 20 ea. A1 garage + 2 (1) (2-) open) R1CR!C 2/U + 1.5 10 x 20 ea. space for (1) (2) each bedroom after first bedroom R-2 3/DU (1-1/2 10 x 20 ea. enclosed + 1- (1) (2) 1/2 open) R-3 2/DU (1 + 40% Class I 10 x 20 ea. 33 covered + 1 of units (1) (2) open) (5) (5) (7) Ordinance No. 1915 25 (H!gh Dcnclty) Hi,qh Density~ Multiple-Story Condominium Public/ Quasi-Public/ Agriculture Churches, Clubs, Lodges, Theaters Schools and School Offices Instructional Studios Agriculture Sanitariums and Rest Homes Private Recreation Gyms, Auditoriums, Skating Rinks without fixed seats Commercial Motels/Hotels/ Lodging Restaurant/Bar and Nightclubs R-3 BQ/CG BNBQ BQ/CG A BQ FP BNBQ CG CG 2/DU 1/4 seats + l/employee + l/special- purpose vehicle 1/employee + 1/56 sq. ft. mutlipurpose room + 8 visitor spaces/school + 1/3 students at senior H.S. or college level I per 150 sq. ft. of floor area 2 garage + 2 open l/doctor + 1/3 employees + 1/6 beds 1/4 seats + 1/employee 1/56 sq. ft. floor area used for seating purposes + l/employee + 40% of units 1/unit + +5% of l/employee auto (2) (3) parking 1/3 seats + +5% of l/employee + auto 1/36 sq. ft. of parking cl~ n~¢, flnnr Class I Class II Class II 10 x 20 ea. (1) (2) (5) (5) (1) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (7) (5) 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize (5) (7) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (7) (5) 15-30 Ordinance No. 1915 26 Restaurants without Separate Bar CG 1/4 seats + +5% of l/employee + auto 1/36 sq. ft. of parking dance floor Class II (5) 33 compact or 100 unisize (5) Restaurant - CG Fast Food Specialty Foods CG Bowling Alleys CG General CG Industrial Manufacturing ML Office/Prototype ML/OA Manufacturing Office Corporate / CG/OP Administrative / General Multi- CG Tenant Medical and CG Dental Office Notes: 1/3 seats + +5% of l/employee auto parking 1/3 seats or +5% of 1/250 sq. ft. auto whichever is parking more 7/lane + +5% of l/employee auto parking 1/250 sq. ft. 1/450 sq. ft. 1/285 sq. ft. 1/285 sq. ft. 1/285 sq. ft. 1/175 sq. ft. +5% of auto parking +5% of auto parking +5% of auto parking +5% of auto parking +5% of auto parking Class II Class II Class II Class II Class Class Class Class I (5) (5) (5) (7) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) 33 compact or 1 O0 unisize 33 compact or 1 O0 unisize 33 compact or 1 O0 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize 50 (4) compact or 100 unisize 50 (4) compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize (5) (5) (5) (7) (5) (5) (5) (5) Ordinance No. 1915 27 1. Enclosed garage. An internal area encompassing twc one or more parking spaces measuring ten feet by twenty feet each and shall provide b__~e unobstructed i.e., by walls, appliances, etc. between six inches from finished floor up to six feet from finished floor. 2. For ten or fewer dwelling units at least one garage space and one uncovered parking space per dwelling unit. For eleven or greater dwelling units at least one covered parking space and one uncovered parking space per dwelling units is required. 3. Guest parking for motels/hotels/lodging shall use a standard nine feet by eighteen feet stall dimension. Twenty-five percent of the required parking for employees and ancillary commercial space may use an eight feet by fifteen feet six inches compact space standard. 4. At least fifty percent of the floor area is devoted to manufacturing, assembly and/or warehousing. 5. Refer to standard details table for stall dimensions~ 6. Refer to standard details table for requirements for handicapped parking. 7. See 19.100.040H for stall dimensions in parking structures. 8. See 19.100.0400 for description of bicycle parking classes. Table 19.100.40-B Parking Space Dimension Chart Type of Angle In Stall Aisle Aisle Car Module, Module, Parking Degrees Width Width Width Space Wall to Wall, Wall to Wall, Stall (A) 1 Way 2Way Depth 2WayAisle 1 Way Aisle Aisle Aisle (C) (D) (D) (B) (B) Standard 0° 9.0 10.0 18.0 22.0 N/A N/A 30° 9.0 10.0 18.0 18.0 47.7 39.7 35° 9.0 10.0 18.0 18.0 49.7 41.7 40° 9.0 10.0 18.0 18.0 51.5 43.5 45° 9.0 11.5 18.0 18.0 53.0 46.5 50° 9.0 13.0 18.0 18.0 54.3 49.3 55° 9.0 14.5 18.0 18.0 55.2 51.7 60° 9.0 16.0 19.0 18.0 56.9 53.9 65° 9.0 17.5 20.0 18.0 58.3 55.8 70° 9.0 19.0 21.0 18.0 59.4 57.4 90° 9.0 N/A 25.0 18.0 61.0 N/A Uni-Size 0° 8.5 10.0 18.0 22.0 N/A N/A 30° 8.5 10.0 18.0 18.0 44.5 36.5 35° 8.5 10.0 18.0 18.0 46.2 38.2 40° 8.5 10.0 18.0 18.0 47.7 39.7 45° 8.5 10.0 18.0 18.0 48.9 40.9 50° 8.5 10.0 18.0 18.0 49.9 41.9 55° 8.5 11.5 18.5 18.0 51.2 44.2 60° 8.5 13.0 19.0 18.0 52.2 46.2 65° 8.5 14.5 19.5 18.0 53.0 48.0 Ordinance No. 1915 2g Compact 90° 8.5 N/A 22.0 18:0 53.0 N/A 0° 8.0 10.0 18.0 19.0 N/A N/A 30° 8.0 10.0 18.0 15.5 43.9 36.5 35° 8.0 10.0 18.0 15.5 43.9 38.2 40° 8.0 10.0 18.0 15.5 45.6 39.7 45° 8.0 10.0 18.5 15.5 47.1 40.9 50° 8.0 11.0 19.0 15.5 48.9 41.9 55° 8.0 12.5 19.5 15.5 50.5 44.2 60° 8.0 14.0 20.0 15.5 51.8 46.2 65° 8.0 15.5 20.5 15.5 52.8 48.0 70° 8.0 17.0 21.0 15.5 53.7 49.5 90° 8.0 N/A 23.0 15.5 54.0 N/A For handicap accessible spaces, please refer to Section 1118A.4 of 1994 Uniform Building Code. For further information, please refer to the Public Works Department Standard Detail Sheets. Table 19.100.040-C CALCULATING SHARED PARKING FOR MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENTS WEEKDAY WEEKEND NIGHTIME Land Use Daytime Evening Daytime Evening (midnight- (9 a.m. -4 p.m.) (6 p.m. - midnight) (9 a.m.-4 (6 p.m.- 6 a.m.) p.m.) , midnight) Office 100% 10% 10% 5% 5% ~2!/Industrial ' Retail 60 90 100 70 5 Hotel 75 100 75 100 75 Restaurant 100 100 100 100 10 EntertainmentJ 40 100 80 100 10 Recreational Instructions: l. 2. 3. 4. Determine the minimum amount of parking required for each land use as though it were a separate use; Multiply each amount by the corresponding percentage for each of the five time periods; Calculate the column total for each time period; The column total with the highest value is the parking space requirement. /5-33 Ordinance No. 1915 29 19.100.050 Exceptions. The decision cf the P!ann~ng Corem{ss{on to grant cr den5' such an cxccptL~n ma2,' Exceptions to A. Issued 1. the parking ordinance may be granted as provided in this section. by the Design Review Committee. With respect to a request for a tandem garage to provide the minimum required enclosed parking in a residential zoning district, the Design Review Committee may grant an exception to allow the use of a tandem garage for required enclosed parking if the subject development meets all of the following criteria: a. The exception will not adversely affect neighboring properties by causin~ unreasonable numbers of vehicles to park on the neighboring properties or upon public streets. b. The tandem garage improves the overall design of the project. The decision of the Design Review Committee to grant or deny an exception may be appealed subject to Chapter 19.136 except that the final decision will be made by the Planning Commission. B. Issued by the Planning Commission. 1. With respect to all other requests for parking exceptions, the Planning Commission may grant an exception if the subject development meets ail of the following criteria: a. There are extraordinary conditions not generally applicable to similar uses which justify the exception (i.e., unusually high percentage of the lot area is landscaped); b. The exception departs from the requirements of this chapter to the minimum degree necessary to allow the proiect to proceed; c. The exception will not adversely affect neighboring properties by causing unreasonable numbers of vehicles to park on the neighboring properties or upon public streets. 2. The decision of the Planning Commission to grant or deny an exception may be appealed to the City Council subject to Chapter 19.136. Ordinance No. 1915 30 19.100.060 Interpretation by the Planning Director. The Director of Community Development shall be empowered to make reasonable interpretations of the regulations and provisions of this chapter consistent with the legislative intent thereof. An interpretation by the Director of Community Development may be appealed by any interested party. The appeal will be heard by the Planning Commission. Chapter 14.18 (Heritage and Specimen Tree) Section 14.18.060 C is amended as follows: Privacy protection planting in R-1 zoning districts shall be maintained. Landscape planting maintenance includes irrigation, fertilization and pruning as necessary to yield a growth rate expected for a particular species ........ ~ ..... j ~ .......... ~ ....... ~ .... O d' Nc !799 ' INTRODUCED at a regular adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the 3rd day of March 2003 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the __ day of 2003, by the following vote: Vote: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: Members of the City Council ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor /5-55 EXHIBIT B Single Family Residential Design Guidelines REVISION Introduction a. Goals and Guiding Principles of Design Guidelines · Create harmonious homes in scale and design. · Allow for continued evolution of the city's housing stock. · Provide a speedy development process for the applicant. · Provide neighbors with input to the development process. General Plan Policies All projects must be consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan policies, including: Policy 2-15: Scale of Residential Development Ensure that the scale and density of new residential development and remodeling is reasonably compatible with the City's predominant single-family residential pattern, except in areas designated for higher density housing. Policy 2-18: Privacy in Site Design Ensure that the site design for a residential project has private indoor and outdoor spaces for each unit and common outdoor recreation space. Policy 2-19: Neighborhood Protection Protect residential neighborhoods from noise, traffic, light and visually intrusive effects from more intense developments with adequate buffering setbacks, landscaping, walls, activity limitations, site design and other appropriate measures. Policy 2-20: Minimizing Privacy Intrusion Keep the sights and sounds of the neighbors from intruding on residents. Techniques can include greater building setbacks, wing walls, window shutters and non-transparent glass. Co Objective New homes and remodel and addition projects offer a great opportunity to create a design that is harmonious with and enhances the neighborhood. However, for this to happen one must observe the existing neighborhood characteristics and incorporate them into their design. A special sensitivity must be shown in the design of two story homes, as they have a greater visual impact on the neighborhood. This visual impact may be greater when the two-story home is directly adjacent to single-story homes. To reduce the impact of new homes on the neighborhood, incorporate the scale, form and materials found in the neighborhood into the design. II. Neighborhood Compatibility Objective · To soften the transition between existing single story neighborhoods and new two-story development. · To improve the integration of new construction into existing neighborhoods. Problem · Architectural design of new two story homes may not account for scale, mass and bulk of existing homes in a neighborhood. · The design of new homes or remodels may not account for the neighborhood style with regard to materials and building forms. Solutions · Keep soil grade changes between properties to a minimum. · Set the first floor elevation as close to existing grade as possible, including the use of alternate footing designs. This does not include split-level portion of the house. · Balance the appearance of new two-story development with those of existing neighborhood by keeping similar architectural form, roof pitch, wall, eave and ridge heights. · For new two-story homes or two-story additions, use one-story elements at the edges to transition to neighboring single-story homes. · l"-"whomed .... ~ ..... ~ ......... ~ ..... ~ .... ~ dg Ac ...... I-' ............... 0 .........0 ........ ] ................... · W~ere new two-story elements or homes are proposed adiacent to single story homes, position new two story windows to protect the privacy of backyard and liv~§ areas ex~sti~§ single story homes. Th~s can be achieved by the use of skylights, clerestory windows, reducing the size of windows, raising the sill height of windows or installing louvers on windows. non dcdducus bees and shrubs. · Second story decks should be placed or designed so as not to offer direct views into adjacent property living or backyard areas. Use solid railings instead of open railings and lattice and landscape screening on sides of decks toward sideyards. · New construction should incorporate building forms, materials and finishes that are common in the neighborhood. · Use roof forms (hip, gable, etc.) that are consistent with the neighborhood pattern. Gable-end roofs typically have more visual mass than hipped roofs, but they are encouraged when it is appropriate for neighborhood compatibility. · New construction should incorporate design principles of symmetry and balance. III. Mass & Bulk Objective · To reduce the appearance of mass and bulk of new structures. Problem · New two story homes or additions having two story vertical walls appear more massive and bulky, due to lack of regard for building indentation, distance to adjacent buildings or impact to light/air to adjoining properties. · How to maintain the building square footage that the public wants but reducing the visible bulk of a building. Solutions · Keep visible second stories wall heights reduced to a minimum by burying them under the roof of the first story. · Reduce the height of walls and entry features to match the eave heights of homes in a neighborhood. · Use vaulted ceilings rather than high exterior walls to achieve higher volume spaces. · Use simple building and roof forms instead of overly complex forms. Too many hips and valleys, bays, etc. can create a busy appearance. · Continuous second-story wails should have building offsets to mitigate the potentially stark appearance. In cases where building offsets create overly complex roof forms, consideration should be given to the design that results in the best overall design. · Two-story wall planes should be avoided. Set back second story from first floor and shape to relate to existing house. Avoid a boxy looking second story. Steep pitched roofs should be avoided u~ess it is consistent with the neighborhood pattern. Use lighter looking materials on second story such as wood or stucco and avoid using heavy looking building materials such as stone or brick. IV. Streetscapes Objective · To promote good site planning techniques that will improve and beautify a neighborhood. Problem · A neighborhood has a pattern as it related to building setback from street, orientation of garages/driveways, sidewalk pattern and public street tree type. This pattern should be maintained when new homes are built in a neighborhood. · New two-story homes are constructed without installation of front yard landscaping and trees to soften the mass of new two-story elements. Solutions · Usable front porches are encouraged. · Plant a 24" box non-deciduous tree in the front yard, in a location to soften the appearance of two-story elements of the home. value cf thc existing ~"'~"'-~ · Design the new home to match the existing neighborhood building setbacks and orientation of garages/driveway. · When the garage doors are h~rned away from the street, use landscape planting, trellises, or the installation of a window(s) facing the street to soften the appearance of what would otherwise be a blank wall. · Garage doors should have a minimum of contrasting color to blend in the doors appearance. · There should not be excessive wall area above the garage door unless it is associated with a gable end roof. · T~, ............. CO~'IA ]"~"~ O~C ....... *~1. ,c~ ~1~C 0~.~~ · The use of tandem parking spaces to have a t~ee-car garage with the visual impact of a ~o-car garage is encouraged. · The garage elevation should not be more than half of the building frontage. EXHIBIT C CITY OF CUP nTI O NEGATIVE DECLARATION As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1973, and amended on March 4, 1974, January 17 1977, May 1, 1978, and July 7, 1980, the following described project was granted a Negative Declaration by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on March 3, 2003. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION EA-2002-15 Application No.: Applicant: Location: MCA-2002-03 City of Cupertino Citywide DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST Amendment to Chapter 19.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code related to single-family residential development in the R1 zoning district. FINDINGS OF DECI$IONMAKING BODY The Planning Commission granted a Negative Declaration since the project is consistent with the General Plan and there are no significant environmental impacts. Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on City Clerk g/erc/ne gEA200215# 2 Peter Gilli EXHIBIT D From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear Gilbert Nagel, Malka [MNagel@cbnorcal.com] Sunday, February 09, 2003 9:52 AM 'GWong212@aol.corn ' R1 ordiance I was overwhelmed by the package I am reviewing for the Ri ordinance. It appears that every few weeks this package Gets bigger and more complicated. While I had the opportunity to meet with Peter Gilli for 6 hours it is disappointing to learn that after our Great suggestions that would alleviate a lot of the issues the ordinance as he proposed has not changed at all. While he calls this clarification again I say it is not. It is a deliberate attempt to lower wall heights, ceilinG heights, and entry heights. It also Gives the PlanninG Staff MORE power. While the ordinance is in conflict with the Guidelines we told Peter to change some of the Guidelines as opposed to changinG the ordinance. Both had been approved by the City Council with the Ordinance beinG more specific. However, he has combined elements from the unclear guidelines into the ordinance. AGain this is not clarification but actual changes that have major impacts on any new development that comes into the city. I have spent many hours the other day photographinG neighborhoods to illustrate some of my points. However, I think that the PlanninG Commission should stop and take time to better understand the IMPACTS of Peter's proposal. I would like to suGGest that you drive around the neighborhoods photographed and step into a new home or two that is beinG built under the tighter Guidelines. You will then see for yourselves how restrictinG and uninvitinG these new homes are. I would be happy to arrange for a tour for all of you commissioners. It would take about 2 hours of your time, but would really help clarify the major issues at hand. Malka NaGel 17 year Cupertino Homeowner Realtor - for Coldwell Banker/Cupertino office Peter Gilli From: -- Sent: To: Subject: ORI 12 [kiwi@orimp.com] Monday, February 10, 2003 2:44 AM planning(~cupertino.org; peterg@cupertino.org comments regarding R1 ordinance modification To: Planning Commission, City of Cupertino Peter Gilli, Community Development Dept., City of Cupertino From: (Mr.) Jan Stoeckenius, Julia Tien 22386 Cupertino Road Date: 2/10/03 Subj: comments regarding Ri ordinance modification The discussion section attached to Application MCA-2002-03/EA-2002-15 indicates that staff believes the 35% second floor to first floor area ratio is necessary to control the mass and bulk of new single family development. We are not certain that why staff holds this belief, or why staff feels this method of regulating building mass is more desirable than others. In particular, while this regulation has discouraged two-story development, we believe it has done very little about building mass. Rather, large and compact two-story designs have been replaced with large and sprawling one-story designs. We believe this trade-off is undesirable both for the occupants of the new development and their -- neighbors. We would recommend an alternative approach that encourages two-story development while restricting overall buildin~ mass. One approach we believe would produce good results is to restrict the footprint of the second-story element (as defined as any part of the structure above 18') to 20% of lot area. In addition, for the purposes of calculating the overall FAR, all areas covered by the second floor shall be considered to be part of the first floor (i.e.: a cantilevered second floor area is double-counted for purposes of the overall FAR). As staff feels specific authorization from the City Council is required prior to any consideration of changes to this part of Section 19.28.060, we urge the Planning Commission to approve a minute order requestin~ such authorization. February 9, 2003 Chich T. Hung P.O. Box 552 Cupertino, CA 95015 City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 RECEiVED'] Dear Planning Commissioner, We are writing to give our consent about the City Building Ordinance Code. We are residents of Cupertino and have a dream to give our children a better living environment, therefore, we work very hard to fulfill it. I and some of Cupertino's residents are very troubled by the view of your department code regarding the height of the ceiling. In our opinion, the height of the ceiling instead of nine or ten feet high should be at least fourteen feet, which would give us the relaxed feeling when we come home from hectic daily work and also enhance the beauty and the value of new house. As we believe, new house structure are stronger than the forty to fifty year old house so they can resist better in case o£big earthquake and save life and the new construction we also contribute tax revenue to the city and the school and moreover, they give a fresher look for the city of Cupertino. Please consider our opinion as Cuperthm residents. Thank you for your kind attention and we are looking forward to your response. Sincerely Yours, Chich Hung How to Sustain Good Neighborhoods and Maintain Privacy Diversity, Creativity, and Respect for All To: Planning Commissioners From: RESIDENTS FOR PROPERTY RIGHTS Re: R1 revisions February 10, 2003 For questions or concerns, email: R 1 ordinance@yahoo.corn Car~ Chien, Shing Chi, Cupertino resident Cupertino resident Steering Members Malka Nagel, Cupertino resident Realtor, Coldwell Banker - Cupertino Dick Fang, Cupertino resident Architect, Cupertino Table of Contents What is Privacy All About? Can Landscaping Help?. Can Fencing Help? Privacy What is Compatibility? Regulation is Harmful Let Neighborhoods Prosper Changes To Ordinance and Guidelines Sample Consultant Report Sample Staff Reports Newer Neighborhood Use Diversity and Architectural Interest to Get Away from "tract home look" 1 2 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 View from new home in Cupertino View from one story home into neighbor's windows, Cupertino View from one stor Foothill Area, Cupertino Privacy is not an old home versus new home or remodeled home issue. It is mutual. Restricting single story wall heights is not the solution. Foothill Area, Cupertino 2 stor~ down on 1 Monta Vista area - note the six foot fence and screening, cover 3Oft tail town home development Landscaping is one way to minimize privacy intrusion. Those who are concerned should consider screening solutions. Other than expanding the privacy tree selection, the current ordinance has a Privacy Planting Plan - Section 19.28.090 6-month growth of Pittosporums currently required by the ordinance, Cupertino. Currently 8ft tall. When the right plants are selected, growth will not take 10 years. All parties must be patient and reasonable. Alcazar Av~, Alcazar Ave, Cupertino Alcazar Ave, Cupertino Felton Way, Cupertino Use 8' fences and latticework to hide walls and minimize privacy intrusion. Allowing vines to grow on the lattice further enhances protection. View from newer homes in Cupertino - lot approximately 9000 sq. feet. Even in newer areas, privacy issues are mutual. WLW. (Who Looks Who?) In reality, privacy is almost non-existent in most neighborhoods. Kennedy Jr. High area, Cupertino Kermedy Jr. High area, Cuperlino 35 New Development with landscaping, Cupertino Cuperlino neighborhoods do not reflect compatibility and it is a broad term. Diversity is reality. Strike instances of compatibility and other general terms from the ordinance. Use Design Guidelines to assist in design, not impose. Monta Vista neighborhood, Cupertino Foothill neighbood, Cupertino Monta Vista neil~hborhood, Cupertino There are many varieties of homes in Cupertino. What is compat/bility? What is "generally consistent" as written in Section 19.28.0607 "By the way, the big house is painted bright pink, which just makes it even more of an eyesore." from Monster homes destxoy neighborhood ambiance letter, Cupertino Courier (Feb 5, 2003) Cupertino neighborhoods Don't use terms such as eyesore, stucco palaces, monster homes, and Taco Bell homes to defame modern architecture. Compatibility is not workable in many Cupertino neighborhoods. Post 1999 R1 two-sro develo merit, Cu ertino ~ Post 1999 R1 two-story development, Cupertino Post 1999 R1 two-stor Post 1999 R1 two-story development, Cupertino Under the new 35% regulation, architects have a difficult time drawing a normal second story portion. It is too small and does not have enough space for three bedrooms. This is a dilemma for families with two kids. Section 19.28.060 B2 should allow and specify higher percentages (i.e. 40-50%). Minute order is an unnecessary administrative step. Felton Way, Cupertino / OLD neighborhood Dumas Drive, Cupertino 16 year old neighborhood · Compatibility results in tract homes. Flexibility and Discretion results in 200 hours of staff work. · All residents want well-designed homes. Allow market to beautify each neighborhood. See BYrne Ave. · Privacy is not related to wall height. WLW. Use Creative Solutions to Minimize Privacy Concerns. · Architecture is Art; and results in Neighborhood Diversi _ty. Diversity is beautiful. Proposal for Changes to Staff's Model Ordinance and Guidelines ORDINANCE Section Remove Change To Justification Any new house or addition to Applicants may use the City's an existing house shall be Single Family Residential R1 19.28.060 C generally consistent with the Design Guidelines to assist in City's Single-Family the design of new two-story Residential Design Guidelines. home or second-story addition. R1 19.28.120 A public notice...that is clearly Post a 8.5 x 11 sign on a four visible foot pole DESIGN GUIDELINES Including the use of alternate Too costly and drainage issue footing designs. For new two-story homes or Achieved with Daylight Plane two story additions, use one- and current second story FAR story elements at the edges to ratios Section II Neighborhood transition to neighboring single Compatibility > Solutions story homes. New construction should Subjective comPatibility incorporate building forms, materials, and finishes that are common in the neighborhood. Use roof fomas (hip, gable, Subjective Compatibility etc.) that are consistent with the neighborhood pattern. Reduce the height of walls and Subjective Compatibility Section III Mass & Bulk > entry features to match the eave Solutions heights of homes in a neighborhood. Three-car garages should be Diversity and creativity, and Section IV Streetscapes > avoided, dependent on lot width Solutions Use tandem parking spaces to Encourage tandem parking Owner's choice have a three-car garage spaces when possible Model ordinance does not achieve the flexibility that the Planning Commission requested, instead gives all the discretion to the staff. It gives staff power. Planners should not have architectural leeway. Trigger for Design Review Committee is arbitrary, where currently it is very clear. Diverse Homes. Oak Valley, Cupertino. MONTEREY COLONIAL FARMt-fOUSE EXTEItlORSTYLES ~ RESIDENCE I:IYE ARTIST'S CONCEPTION OF HOMES, ELEVATIONS, At'''~'' tANDSCAPING ALL DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE FINAL ELEVATIOb ;JECT TO CHANGE SHINGLE PRAIRIE SPANISH IEXTEPdOI~STYL[S ~ I~[SIDENCE:[OUI~ ARTIST'S CONCEPTION OF HOMES, ELEVATIONS, AND LANDSCAPING - ALL DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE FINAL ELEVATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE CRA F T S M A N IALSO AVAILABLE IN SHINGLEI TIMBERED COTTAGE BUNGALOW PRAIRIE EXTERIOR STYLES ~ RESIDENCE THREE ARTIST'S CONCEPTION OF HOMES, ELEVATIONS, AND LANDSCAPING - ALL DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE FINAL ELEVATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE · A F T S M A N S T U C C O IALSO AVAILABLE WITH SHINGLES} B U N G A L O W TIMBERED COTTAGE EXTERIOR STYLES ~ RESIDENCE T~'O ARTIST'S CONCEPTION OF HOMES, ELEVATIONS, AND LANDSCAPING - ALL DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE FINAL ELEVATIONS SUBIECT TO CHANGE C OTTAG E PRAIRIE )R ADDITIONAL EXTERIOR STYLES. PLEASE TURN THE PAGE. CARPENTER GOTHIC EXTERIOR S-IYLES ,~ RESIDENCE SIX ARTIST'S CONCEPTION OF F~OMES, ELEVATIONS, AND LANDSCAPING - ALL DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE FINAL ELEVATIONS SUBJECT TO CHANGE CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: MCA-2002-03, EA-2002-15 Applicant: City of Cupertino Property Owner: Various Property Location: City-wide Agenda Date: February 10, 2003 Application Summary: Amendments to Chapter 19.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code and other sections of the code, if needed, related to changes to Single-Family Residential regulations. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1. Recommend approval of MCA~2002-03 based on the Model Ordinance; 2. Recommend approval of modifications to the Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines; 3. Recommend approval of a negative declaration, EA-2002-15. BACKGROUND Staff introduced a number of changes to the R1 Ordinance on November 25, 2002. The proposed changes were consistent with the guiding principles of the R1 Design Review process of reducing mass and bulk of new construction and softening the transition of new development into existing neighborhoods. At the Planning Commission meeting on November 25, 2002, the Commission suggested exploring significant changes to the R1 Ordinance, guidelines and procedures. The intent of these changes was to add flexibility to the development of single-family residences. Commissioners expressed their views that the regulation that limits the area of the second-floor to no more than 35% of the first-floor should be eased. On January 13, 2003, the Planning Commission reviewed changes to the single- family design review process that would simplify the process for projects that conform to the ordinance and would ease the process for projects that request variation from the prescriptive regulations. DISCUSSION Providing Greater Flexibili _ty The Model Ordinance provides amended processes for new construction as discussed on January 13, 2003. The Director would review all conforming two-story development. The Design Review Committee will review all requests for variations MCA-2002-03 February 10, 2003 Page 2 from the prescriptive regulations, but the findings for such requests are amended to focus on whether the variation results in improved neighborhood compatibility and superior design. Please refer to the Model Ordinance for specifics. Range of Flexibility The concept of defining a range for the prescriptive regulations such as second-story area, heights, and offsets was briefly discussed. The current prescriptive regulations were determined over a two-year period and over a dozen Commission meetings. Other than a small sampling of photographs, staff has no examples of projects that illustrate what might be acceptable under the new processes. Without that level of study, staff does not believe it is appropriate to define a range for the prescriptive regulations at this time. New Process Impact on Staff The proposed process changes would result in additional work for planning staff. Based on three years of history and assuming the number of applications remains constant, the new process would require about 200 additional hours of staff time. This should not be a significant impact on staff. Tall Single-Story Walls The issue of tall single-story wall heights was discussed at the January 13, 2003 hearing. Members of the public spoke for and against additional height restrictions. The Commission had differing ideas concerning this issue: · Commissioner Auerbach supported a reduction in the maximum.wall height, but only at the setback line. · Commissioner Chen was hesitant to support a height reduction, but considered reviewing single-story development to address the privacy concerns with the taller wall heights. · Commissioner Saadati stated that he believed the issue was one of design, not the height of the wall. · Commissioner Wong did not support a height reduction, but wanted to find another way to address the privacy impact from the related single-story walls. · Chairperson Corr also commented on the need to provide privacy protection. Based on the comments from the Commission, staff proposes that section 19.28.060 C be amended to apply to single-story development instead of lowering all building heights. This section allows the Director to divert building permit applications to the design review process in cases where there are clear cases of incompatibility or significant neighborhood impacts. This will provide staff with some discretion in addressing compatibility and privacy issues on a case-by-case basis, but allow projects that do not result in significant impacts to remain unchanged. MCA-2002-03 February 10, 2003 Page 3 Speakers from the lanuary Meeting Staff met with the speakers who were opposed to the height reduction on January 28, 2003. The following suggestions were provided to address the visual and privacy impact of tall single-story walls near the side property line: · Require the installation of an 8' or taller fence when tall walls are built close to the side property line. Staff believes that this could be a solution to some cases of incompatible heights, and will consider it in applicable cases. Staff does not recommend that this be made a regulation. · Require building/wall offsets for the first-floor, as is the case on the second- floor. An offset is required every 24' on the second-floor. If applied to single- stories, this would preclude a continuous wall at the minimum setback. This would soften the impact of taller walls in some cases. With narrow lots, requiring a single-story offset could be less desirable than lowering the wall height, since the offset will be affect floor area. As recommended with the fence suggestion, staff does not recommend that single-story wall offsets by enacted as a regulation, but be considered in cases where it is appropriate. · Place a limit on the span of a gable-end that can encroach into the building envelope to ensure that the height of the gable-end does not get too tall. The R1 Ordinance already has a provision that addresses this. In the meeting, staff received other suggestions concerning the R1 Ordinance Amendment: · Revisit the 25-degree angle in the R1 building envelope. The 25-degree angle allows for roof pitches up to 5.5/12, assuming the wall height is at the maximum 12-foot height. Standard roof pitches proposed in Cupertino are 4/12 or 5/12. Staff does not recommend changes to this regulation. · Provide flexibility in the use of the first-story side setback. On standard lots, the minimum setback is 10 feet and 5 feet. The suggestion is to allow variations on the setback that add up to 15 feet, such as 7 feet and 8 feet or 6 feet and 9 feet. If first-story side setbacks were to be amended, staff would recommend that lots in the R1-10 zone have side setbacks of 10 feet and 10 feet, with smaller side setbacks for 7,500, 6,000 and 5,000 sq. ft. lots. However, staff is not aware of any controversy co. ncerning the current setbacks and does not recommend any changes. · Consider allowing a 1-car garage with 3 cars on the driveway for 6000 sq. ft. lots or less and allow the area that would have been used for the second garage space to be used as living space. This is similar to Commissioner Auerbach's suggestion concerning garages in the Rancho Rinconada area. Staff believes this could have significant impacts on neighborhoods and should not be considered without significant public outreach. If the Planning Commission wishes to pursue this topic, it should be added to the Planning Division's work program. Expand the privacy tree selection. The selection of privacy trees should be expanded. Staff has recommended removing the list of trees and their MCA-2002-03 February 10, 2003 Page 4 associated forms from the ordinance and placing it in a handout to allow for easier updates of the privacy tree list. Relax the regulation that limits second-story area to 35% of the first-story. This concept echoes the comments of many of the Planning Commissioners. Staff believes that easing the maximum second-floor area regulation in the R1 Ordinance would be contrary to the goals and principles of the Design Review process, in that it could lead to an increase in the mass and bulk of new single-family development. If the Commission wishes to pursue this concept, staff recommends that the Commission approve a minute order to the City Council requesting authorization to invest/gate easing the regulation. On February 5, 2003, staff received via e-mail a list of recommended ordinance changes from a speaker at the Planning Commission meeting who supported increased restrictions for single-family projects. Due to the lateness of the submittal, staff cannot address the recommendations in this report, but the e-mail message and photographs are attached. Parking Ordinance Recommendations The Planning Commission considered reducing on-site parking requirements in certain neighborhoods. Staff recommended that this topic be analyzed separately from this ordinance amendment. Chairperson Corr suggested that all of the parking ordinance modifications proposed be reviewed separately. A separate study of the parking ordinance is underway, but there is not a timetable on when the item will be heard by the Planning Commission. There are amendments proposed to the parking ordinance that would improve and encourage the use of less impervious surface on residential properties. Improving on-site infiltration of storm-water runoff is an important task for the City. Staff requests that the Commission include all proposed amendments to the parking ordinance except for the reduction in on-site parking requirements. Prepared by: Approved by: Peter Gilli, Senior Planner Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development~ Attachments Exhibit A: Model Ordinance Exhibit B: Revised Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines (w/o exhibits) E-mail and photographs from Jennifer Ediyanto received February 5, 2003 Staff report and attachments from January 13, 2003 Staff report and attachments from November 25, 2002 t5-7o EXHIBIT A New concepts since January 13, 2003 are underlined. MODEL ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO, AMENDING CHAPTERS 19.28, 19.80, 19.100 AND 14.18 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Strike Chapter 19.28 in its entirety and replace with the following: Chapter 19.28 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (RI) ZONES 19.28.010 19.28.020 19.28.030 19.28.040 19.28.050 19.28.060 19.28.070 19.28.090 19.28.100 19.28.110 19.28.120 19.28.130 19.28.140 Purposes. Applicability of regulations. Permitted uses. Conditional uses. General regulations. Development regulations. Development regulations - Eichler (Rl-e). Landscape Requirements Second Story Decks Permitted yard encroachments. Discretionary design approval by the Director of Community Development. Discretionary design approval by the Design Review Committee. Interpretation by the Director of Community Development. 19.28.010 Purposes. RI Single-Family Residential Districts are intended to create, preserve and enhance areas suitable for detached dwellings in order to: A. Enhance the identity of residential neighborhoods; B. Ensure provision of light, air and a reasonable level of privacy to individual residential parcels; C. Ensure a reasonable level of compatibility !n scale of structures within residential neighborhoods; D. Reinforce the predominantly low-intensity setting in the community. 19.28.020 Applicability of regulations. No building, structure or land shall be used, and no building or structure shall be hereafter erected, structurally altered or enlarged in an R1 Single-Family Residential District other than in conformance with the provisions of this chapter and other applicable provisions of this title. 19.28.030 Permitted uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the R1 Single-Family Residential District: A. Single-family use; B. A second dwelling unit conforming to the provisions, standards and procedures described in Chapter 19.82, except for those second dwelling units requiring a conditional use permit; C. Accessory facilities and uses customarily incidental to permitted uses and otherwise conforming with the provisions of Chapter 19.80 of this title; D. Home occupations in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 19.92; E. Horticulture, gardening, and growing of food products for consumption by occupants of the site; F. Residential care facility that is licensed by the appropriate State, County agency or department with six or less residents, not including the provider, provider family or staff; G. Small-family day care home; H. The keeping of a maximum of four adult household pets, provided that no more than two adult dogs or cats may be kept on the site; I. Utility facilities essential to provision of utility services to the neighborhood but excluding business offices, construction or storage yards, maintenance facilities, or corporation yards; J. Large-family day care home, which meets the parking criteria contained in Chapter 19.100 and which is at least three hundred feet from any other large- family day care home. The Director of Community Development or his/her designee shall administratively approve large day care homes to ensure compliance with the parking and proximity requirements; K. Congregate residence with ten or less residents. 19.28.040 Conditional uses. The following uses may be conditionally allowed in the RI Single-Family Residential District, subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit: A. Issued by the Director of Community Development: 1. Temporary uses, subject to regulations established by Chapter 19.124; 2. Large-family day care home, which otherwise does not meet the criteria for a permitted use. The conditional use permit shall be processed as provided by Section 15.97.46(3) of the State of California Health and Safety Code; 3. Buildings or structures which incorporate solar design features that require variations from setbacks upon a determination by the Director that such design feature or features will not result in privacy impacts, shadowing, intrusive noise or other adverse impacts to the surrounding area; 4. Second dwelling units which require a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 19.84; 5. Home occupations requiring a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 19.92 of this title. Issued by the Planning Commission: 1. Two-story structures in an area designated for a one-story limitation pursuant to Section 19.28.060 E(2) of this chapter, provided that the Planning Commission determines that the structure or structures will not result in privacy impacts, shadowing, or intrusive noise, odor, or other adverse impacts to the surrounding area; 2. Group care activities with greater than six persons; 3. Residential care facility that is not required to obtain a license by the State, County agency or department and has six or less residents, not including the providers, provider family or staff; 4. Residential care facility that has the appropriate State, County agency or department license and seven or greater residents, not including the provider family or staff, is a minimum distance of five hundred feet from the property boundary of another residential care facility; 5. Residential care facility that is not required to obtain a license by the State, County agency or department and has seven or greater residents, not including the provider family or staff, is a minimum distance of five hundred feet from the property boundary of another residential care facility; 6. Congregate residence with eleven or more residents, which is a minimum distance of one thousand feet from the boundary of another congregate residence and has a minimum of seventy-five square feet of usable rear yard area per occupant. 19.28.050 General regulations. A. Lot Area Zoning Designations. 1. Minimum lot area shall correspond to the number (multiplied by one thousand square feet) following the R1 zoning symbol. Examples are as follows: Zoning Symbol Number Minimum Lot Area in Square Feet R1 5 5,000 R1 6 6,000 R1 7.5 .7,500 R1 10 10,000 R1 20 2O,OOO 2. Lots that have less area than required by Section 19.28.050 A(1), but not less than five thousand square feet, may nevertheless be used as building sites, provided that all other applicable requirements of this title are fulfilled. B. Lot Width. The minimum lot width shall be sixty feet measured at the front-yard setback line, except in the R1-5 district where the minimum lot width is fifty feet. C. Development on Slopes of Thirty Percent or Greater. 1. Site plans for all development proposals shall include topographical information at contour intervals not to exceed ten feet. Areas where slopes are thirty percent or greater shall be identified on the site development plan. 2. Buildings proposed on a portion ora lot with slopes of thirty percent or greater shall be developed in accordance with the site development and design standards specified in Sections 19.40.050 through 19.40.140 of the Residential Hillside ordinance, or Chapter 19.28, whichever specific regulation is mom restrictive. 3. No structure or improvements shall occur on slopes of thirty percent or greater unless an exception is granted in accordance with Section 19.40.140, unless no more than five hundred square feet of development, including grading and structures, occurs on an area with a slope of thirty percent or greater. D. An application for building permit filed and accepted by the City (fees paid and control number issued) on or before [date to be determined at CiO2 Council meeting! may proceed with application processing under the ordinances in effect at that time. 19.28.060 Development Regulations. A. Lot Coverage. The maximum lot coverage shall, be forty-five percent of the net lot area. B. Floor Area Ratio. 1. The maximum floor area ratio of all structures on a lot shall be forty-five percent. 2. The maximum floor area of a second story shall be thirty-five percent of the existing or proposed first story floor area or six hundred square feet, whichever is greater. 3. Interior building area with floor to ceiling heights greater than fifteen feet shall be added to the second story floor area unless the house is single- story. C. Design Guidelines. 1. Any new house or addition to an existing house shall be generally consistent with the City's Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines. The Director of Community Development shall review new projects and shall determine that the following items are met prior to issuance of building permits: a. The mass and bulk of the design shall be reasonably compatible with the predominant neighborhood pattern. New construction shall not be disproportionately larger than or out of scale with the neighborhood pattern in terms of building forms, roof pitches, eave heights, ridge heights, and entry feature heights; b. The design shall use vaulted ceilings rather than high exterior walls to achieve higher volume interior spaces; c. For projects with three-car garages oriented to the public right- of-way, the wall plane of the third space shall be set back a minimum of two feet from the wall plane of the other two spaces, or shall incorporate a tandem space. There shall not be a three- car wide driveway curb cut. 2. If the Director does not find that the proposal is generally consistent with this section, than an application must be made for design approval pursuant to Section 19.28.120. D. Design Review. 1. Any new two-story house, or second-story addition to an existing house, which conforms to the regulations in this chapter shall require discretionary design approval from the Director of Community Development pursuant to Section 19.28.120. 2. Any new house, or addition to an existing house, which does not conform to one or more of the regulations in Section 19.28.060 shall require discretionary design approval from the Design Review Committee pursuant to Section 19.28.130. E. Setback--First Story (Nonaccessory Structures). 1. Front Yard. The minimum front yard setback is twenty feet; provided, that for a curved driveway the setback shall be fifteen feet as long as there are no more than two such fifteen-foot setbacks occurring side by side. 2. Side Yard. At least one of two side yard setbacks must be no less than ten feet, with the other side yard setback no less than five feet, except as follows: a. The minimum side-yard setback for the street-side of a corner lot shall be twelve feet. The minimum interior side setback for a corner lot shall be five feet. b. The minimum side-yard setbacks for a lot with an average width less than sixty feet measured at the front and rear setback lines shall be five feet on each side yard. c. The minimum side-yard setback for a garage on the street-side of a coruer lot shall be twenty feet. 3. Rear Yard. The minimum rear yard setback is twenty feet. The rear setback may be reduced to ten feet if, after the reduction, the usable rear yard area is at least twenty times the lot width as measured from the front setback line. F. Setback--Second Floor (Nonaccessory Structures). 1. The minimum front and rear setbacks are twenty-five feet. 15'-75 2. The minimum side setbacks are ten feet, except as follows: a. The minimum side setback from a street-side property line is twelve feet. b. The minimum side setback for a flag lot is twenty feet. 3. Setback Surcharge. An additional fifteen feet of second-story setback shall be required. a. The total surcharge shall be added to the front and side setbacks in any combination, except that at least five feet shall be applied to the second-story side setbacks. b. In the case of a side-yard adjacent to a rear yard of another single-family residential property, ten feet of the surcharge shall be applied to that side. 4. The visible height of second story walls is regulated as follows: a. Fifty percent of the total perimeter length of second story walls shall not have exposed wall heights greater than six feet, and shall have a minimum two-foot high overlap of the adjoining first story roof against the second floor wall. The overlap shall be structural and shall be offset a minimum of four feet from the first story exterior wall plane. At At least bo All visible second story wall heights are required to have building wall offsets at least every twenty-four feet, with a mimmum two-foot depth and six-foot width. The offsets shall comprise the full height of the wall plane. less than 24' 2'-0' min. less than 24' Second Roor Pbn . ' _ · / 2'-o' m~ less than 24' ~ less than c. All second story roofs shall have a minimum of one-foot eaves. G. Basements. 1. The number, size and volume of lightwells, stairwells and basement windows and doors shall be the minimum required by the Uniform Building Code for emergency egress, light and ventilation, except as permitted by this section. 2. Maximum size ora lightwell or stairwell for a basement: a. Length, as measured parallel to the basement wall, may be one foot more than the minimum width of a basement door or window providing light, air and ventilation to the basement. In the case of a stairwell, this regulation applies to the length of the landing. b. Width, as measured perpendicular between the basement wall and the lightwel! or stairwell retaining wall, shall be three feet. c. In the case of a single-story house, one lightwell or stairwell may have a length and width often feet. 3. Setbacks. No part of a basement, stairwell or lightwell retaining wall may encroach into the following setbacks: a. The minimum front setback shall be twenty feet; b. The minimum side setback shall be five feet; c. The minimum rear setback shall be ten feet. 4. No part of a basement, stairwell or lightwell retaining wall may encroach into the drip line of a specimen tree or required privacy tree. H. Height. 1. The maximum building height of any principal dwelling shall be twenty- eight feet, not including fireplace chimneys, antennae or other appurtenances. 2. The maximum exterior wall height and building height of single-story structures and single-story sections of two-story structures shall fit into a building envelope defined by: a. A twelve-foot high vertical line measured from natural grade and located at the side-setback line; b. A twenty-five-degree roof line angle projected inward at the twelve-foot high line referenced in Section 19.28.060 H(2)(a). c. Notwithstanding the above, a gable end of a roof may have a maximum wall height of eighteen feet to the peak of the roof as measured from natural grade. 3. Areas Restricted to One Story. The City Council may prescribe that all buildings within a designated area be limited to one story in height (not exceeding eighteen feet) by affixing to the R1 zoning district, the designation "i" provided, however, that the limitation may be removed through use permit approval, as provided in Section 19.28.040 B by the Planning Commission. 4. The maximum entry feature height, as measured from natural grade to the top of the wall plate, shall be fourteen feet. Plate Entry ---.. Fea~u re Finish Grade I Additional Site Requirements. 1. No blank single-story side walls longer than sixteen feet shall face a public right-of-way without at least one of the following: a. At least one offset with a minimum two-foot depth and six-foot width; the offset shall comprise the full height of the wall plane; b. Window of at least thirty inches by thirty inches; c. Entry feature leading to a door; d. Trellis with landscape screening. 2. Accessory Buildings/Structures. Chapter 19.80 governs setbacks, coverage and other standards for accessory structures. 3. Parking and Front-Yard Paving. Chapter 19.100 governs parking and front-yard paving requirements. 19.28.070 Development regulations--Eichler (Rl-e). Rl-e Single-Family Residential Eichler Districts protect a consistent architectural form through the establishment of district site development regulations. Regulations found in the other sections of this chapter shall apply to properties zoned Rl-e. In the event of a conflict between other regulations in this chapter and this section, this section shall prevail. Nothing in these regulations is intended to preclude a harmonious two-story home or second story addition. A. Setback--First Story. The minimum front yard setback is twenty feet. B. Building Design Requirements. 1. Entry features facing the street shall be integrated with the roof line of the house. 2. The maximum roof slope shall be 3:12 (rise over run). 3. Wood or other siding material located on walls facing a public street (not including the garage door) shall incorporate vertical grooves, up to six inches apart. 4. The building design shall incorporate straight architectural lines, rather than curved lines. /5-77 5. Second story building wall offsets described in Section 19.28.060 F(4)(b) are not required for homes in the R1 ~e zone. 6. The first floor shall be no more than twelve inches above the existing grade. 7. Exterior walls located adjacent to side yards shall not exceed nine feet in height measured from the top of the floor to the top of the wall plate. C. Privacy Protection Requirements. 1. Side and Rear Yard Facing Second Floor Windows. In addition to other privacy protection requirements in Section 19.28.090, the following is required for all second story windows: a. Cover windows with exterior louvers to a height of six feet above the second floor; or b. Obscure glass to a height of six feet above the second floor; or c. Have a window sill height of five feet minimum above the second floor. 19.28.090 Landscape Requirements To mitigate privacy impacts and the visual mass and bulk of new two-story homes and additions, tree and/or shrub planting is required. The intent of this section is to provide substantial screening within three years of the planting. A. Applicability. This requirement shall apply to new two-story homes, second-story decks, two-story additions, or modifications to the existing second-story decks or existing windows on existing two-story homes that increase privacy impacts on neighboring residents. Skylights, windows with sills more than five feet above the finished second floor, windows with permanent, exterior louvers up to six feet above the finished second floor, and obscured, non-openable windows are not required to provide privacy protection planting. B. Privacy Planting Plan. A building permit application for a new two-story house or a second story addition shall be accompanied by a privacy planting plan which identifies the location, species and canopy diameter of existing and proposed trees or shrubs. 1. New trees or shrubs shall be required on the applicant's property to screen views from second-story windows. The area where planting is required is bounded by a thirty-degree angle on each side window jamb. The trees or shrubs shall be planted prior to issuance of a final occupancy permit. / a. New trees or shrubs are not required to replace existing trees or shrubs if an Internationally Certified Arborist or Licensed Landscape Architect verifies that the existing trees/shrubs have the characteristics of privacy planting species, subject to approval by the Director of Community Development. b. Affected property owner(s) may choose to allow privacy planting on their own property. In such cases, the applicant must plant the privacy screening prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Waiver. These privacy mitigation measures may be modified in any way with a signed waiver statement from the affected property owner. Modifications can include changes to the number of shrubs or trees, their species or locations. C. Front-Yard Tree Planting. Applicants for new two-story homes and two-story additions must plant a tree in front of new second stories in the front yard setback area. The tree shall be 24 inch-box or larger, with a minimum height of six feet. The Director of Community Development can waive this front-yard tree if there is a conflict with existing mature tree canopies on-site or in the public right-of-way. D. Species List. The Planning Division shall maintain a list of allowed privacy planting trees and shrubs. The list shall include allowed plant species, minimum size of trees and shrubs, expected canopy or spread size, and planting distance between trees. E. Covenant. The property owner shall record a covenant with the Santa Clara County Recorders Office that requires the retention of new privacy planting, or use of existing vegetation as privacy planting, prior to receiving a final building inspection from the Building Division. This regulation does not apply to situations described in Section 19.28.090 B(1)(b). F. Maintenance. The required plants shall be maintained. Landscape planting maintenance includes irrigation, fertilization and pruning as necessary to yield a growth rate expected for a particular species. G. Replacement. Where required planting is removed or dies it must be replaced within thirty days with privacy tree(s) of similar size as the tree(s) being replaced, unless it is determined to be infeasible by the Director of Community Development. 19.28.100 Second Story Decks All new or expanded second story decks with views into neighboring residential side or rear yards are must obtain an discretionary approval in accordance with Section 19.28.120 in order to protect the privacy of adjoining properties. The goal of the exception requirement is not to require complete visual protection but address privacy protection to the greatest extent while still allowing the construction and use of an outdoor deck. This section applies to second-story decks, patios, balconies, or any other similar unenclosed features. A. A second-story deck or patio may encroach three feet into the front setback for the principal dwelling. [I. The minimum side-yard setback shall be fifteen feet. C. The minimum rear-yard setback shall be twenty feet. 19.28.110 Permitted yard encroachments. A. Where a building legally constructed according to existing yard and setback regulations at the time of construction encroaches upon present required side-yard setbacks: 1. One encroaching wall may be extended along its existing building lines, for a maXimum distance of fifteen feet, as long as the extension or addition does not further encroach into the required setback and the height of the extended wall is not increased. 2. Only one such extension shall be permitted for the life of such building. 3. The extension or addition may not further encroach into any required setback. 4. In no case may the wall plane be located closer than three feet to any property line. 5. This section applies to the first story only and shall not be construed to allow the further extension of an encroachment by any building, which is the result of the granting of a variance, either before or after such property become part of the City. B. Architectural Features (not including patio covers) may extend into a required yard a distance not exceeding three feet; provided that no architectural feature, or combination thereof, whether a portion of a principal or accessory structure may extend closer than three feet to any property line. 19.28.120 Discretionary design approval by the Director of Community Development. Discretionary_ design review is required for all conforming two-story development in the R1 zone. The applicant shall submit a complete application to the Director of Community Development for design approval to allow the new development. A. Prior to the acceptance of a design review application, the applicant shall: 1. Install story poles to outline the proposed building exterior walls and roof for all two-story development as described by procedures developed by the Director of Community Development. 2. Install a public notice in the from yard of the subject site that is clearly visible from the public street. B. Public Notice. Upon receipt ora complete application for design review, the Director of Community Development shall order the public notice of the received application. The notice shall be sent by first-class mail to all owners of record of real property (as shown in the last tax assessment roll) that are adiacent to the subject property. 1. The notice shall contain the following: a. The exact address of the property, if known, or the location of the property, if the address is not known; b. A brief description, the content of which shall be in the sole discretion of the City, of the proposed project; c. The name and contact information for the staffperson assigned to the project; d. A reduced-scale copy of the proposed plan set; e. Reference to the application on file for particulars; f. A date by which all comments concerning the project must be submitted to the Community Development Department. This date shall be no less than fourteen calendar days from the mailing of the notice: g. A statement that any interested person, or agent thereof, may submit comments concerning the project. 2. Compliance with the notice provisions set forth in this section shall constitute a good-faith effort to provide notice, and the failure to provide notice, and the failure of any person to receive notice, shall not prevent the City from proceeding to consider or take action with respect to an application under this chapter. 3. Typographical errors in the notice shall not invalidate the notice nor any City action related to the notice. C. Design Review Decision. The Director may approve a design review application if all of the following findings are made: 1. The project is consistent with the Cupertino General Plan and Title 19 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 2. The granting of this permit will not result in detrimental or injurio,m conditions to property or improvements in the vicinity, or to the public health, safety or welfare. 3. The project is generally compatible with the established pattern of building forms, building materials and designs of homes in the neighborhood. 4. The project is generally consistent with the City's single-family residential design guidelines. 5. Significant adverse visual impacts as viewed from adjoining properties have been mitigated to the maximum extent possible. D. Second Story Deck Decision. The Director may approve a second-story deck application if all of the following findings are made: 1. The deck design decreases privacy impacts by minimizing the sensitive views into adioining yards to the greatest extent possible. 2. The deck design is compatible with the architectural style of the primary structure. E. Notice of Action. The Director shall render his decision in writing, stating reasons thereof. Notice of the action shall be mailed to the applicant, adjacent property owners, and any member of the public who commented on the proiect, the Planning Commission and the City Council. F. Appeal. Interested party may appeal the action of the Director subiect to Chapter 19.136. G. Expiration. A decision for approval which has not been used within one year following the effective date thereof, shall become null and void and of no effect unless a shorter time period shall specifically be prescribed by the conditions of design approval. I. An approval shall be deemed to have been used when a complete building permit application is submitted to the Chief Building Official, and continues to progress in a diligent manner. In the event that the building permit application expires, the design approval shall become null and void. 2. The Director of Community Development may grant a single one-year extension without public notice and hearing upon the receipt of a written request justifying the extension. H. Concurrent Applications. Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter to the contrary, an application for design review may, at the discretion of the Director of Community Development, be processed concurrently with other land use approvals. 19.28.130 Discretionary design review by the Design Review Committee. Where results inconsistent with the purpose and intent of this chapter result from the strict application of the provisions hereof, exceptions to Sections 19.28.060, 19.28.070 and 19.28.090 may be granted as provided in this section. A. Procedures for discretionary design review by the Design Review Committee shall be based on Section 19.28.120 except that: 1. The public notice shall be to all property owners within 300 feet of the subiect property. 2. Reduced-scale plan sets may be excluded in the notice. 3. In lieu of a date for the submittal of comments, the notice will have a date, time and location for a public hearing. 4. In addition to the findings listed in Section 19.28.120 C, the Design Review Committee must make the following findings: a. The flexibility from the literal enforcement of the prescriptive regulations in Section 19.28.060 results in a proiect whose design is superior to a conforming project and improves the compatibility of the project to the established neighborhood pattern of building forms, designs and building materials. B. Variation from the following sections of this chapter shall require a Variance pursuant to Chapter 19.124. 1. Section 19.28.060 B(1) and B(3). 2. Section 19.28.060 D(1). 3. Section 19.28.060 F. 19.28.140 Interpretation by the Director of Community Development. The Director of Community Development shall be empowered to make reasonable interpretations of the regulations and provisions of this chapter consistent with the legislative intent thereof. Any interested party may appeal an interpretation by the Director of Community Development. The Planning Commission will hear the appeal. Proposed text is underlined. Deleted text is struck through. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Chapter 19.80 (Accessory Buildings/Structures) is amended as follows: 19.80.030 Site development regulations. General Regulations. Except as otherwise provided in this section, accessory buildings shall at all times be located in conformance with requirements for principal buildings, and shall not be located in any required front, sides, or rear yard setback area. A. Residential and Agricultural Zones. In residential and agricultural zoning districts, accessory buildings and structures may be located in a required interior yard, subject to the following restrictions: 1. With respect to accessory buildings and structures (including decks and patios) which are attached to principal dwellings, all site development regulations, including setbacks, height and lot coverage regulations applicable to principal dwellings in the applicable zone also govern attached accessory buildings/structures except as otherwise specified below: a. Ground level paving, landscape features, lightwells, stairwells leading to a basement, and open recreational facilities are excluded from lot coverage regulations, c. Thc.)' Attached accessory buildings/structures shall be structurally integrated with the principal dwelling, d. Unenclosed patio covers may extend as close as ten feet to the rear property line, e. Attached recreational structures which have a floor or step height greater than eighteen inches above any point of the adjoining finished grade, must have a minimum setback of ten feet from any property line, f. In agricultural zoning districts attached accessory buildings/structures which are used solely for agricultural uses are not restricted as to height, provided that such buildings/structures are of a design and height usual for that purpose. g. First-floor decks and patios, other than described in subsection B 1 e of this section, may encroach to within three feet of a property line, h. First-floor decks and patios may encroach three feet into front- yard setbacks, j. Second story decks in R1 R 1 zoning districts are regulated by Section 19.28.100 ~n Qa ~ 1~ q~T.,~ ~;~;~ .... ;,4 ..... ,4 ~+1.,~1~ C ...... ~A ~t-~,. A~I~. d ii. Twenty five fcct in agricultural zcnes; With respect to detached accessory buildings/structures (including an R2 R 2 zoning district): a. In R 1 RI, RHS, A and A 1 A1 zones: i. The area of an accessory building/structure, not including garage space, shall be limited to the gross building area as per Section 19.84.030 D. ii. Basements in detached accessory buildings/structures shall count as floor area, and shall be subiect to the regulations in, Basement !ig~:,'cl!s skall cc, nfo,ur- to Section 19.28.060 F. iii. Detached accessory buildings with living space shall conform to Chapter 19.84. b. The maximumqot coverage is thirty percent of the useable rear yard area; c. The minimum distance from a principal dwelling is five feet (measured between the eaves); d. Small, portable storage buildings and air conditioning units less than six feet in height, which are not attached to a building, permanent foundation, or pad, may be located closer than five feet to a principal dwelling, but no closer than three feet from any property line; e. No detached accessory building or structure shall be located less than three feet from any property line; f. Detached accessory buildings and structures shall be limited to a single story and shall not exceed a height of seven feet beginning at a three-foot setback from rear or side property lines. The height encompasses the entire wall plane nearest the property line, including the roof, eaves, and any portion of the foundation visible above the adjoining finished grade. The wall plane height may be increased by one foot for each additional one and one- half feet of setback (corresponding to a thirty-three-degree angle), up to a maximum wall plane height of fifteen feet, as depicted in the diagram attached to the ordinance codified in this title. The maximum height of construction shall not exceed twenty feet; g. Walls which are less than five feet to a property line may not have windows or if windows are installed they must be obscured glass or have the sill height above five feet from the floor. This requirement shall not apply to skylight or windows which face a right-of-way or a nonresidential zoning district; h. Detached recreational buildings/structures which have a floor or step height greater than eighteen inches above any point at the adjoining finished grade, must have a setback often feet from any property. An affixed play structure, such as a swing or climbing apparatus, is allowed in the setback area if it is at least three feet from the property line and if it exceeds the heights and setbacks as required in subsections B2b and c of this section and meets one of the two following conditions: It is adjacent to a comer property line, or, if not on a comer, the immediately adjacent property owner agrees to the location prior to construction; i. The minimum front-yard setbacks for detached accessory buildings/structures are: i. Twenty feet in residential zones; ii. Thirty feet in agricultural zones. j. With respect to comer lots, the street-side yard setback shall be fifteen feet, except: must be -^ less thn- c.~, c~, ~,a ,~ ,~ i. Twenty feet in the event that the comer lot is adiacent to a key lot; ii. Twenty feet for a garage or carport. k. In R2 and R3 R 2 o,~nd R 2 zones, in the case of an interior lot abutting only one street, no detached accessory building or structure, except a detached garage, may occupy the front fifty percent of the lot area. All no;;' or expanded :econd sto~D' decks in t~e R I zoning distffct 19.80.050 Interpretation by the Director of Community Development. The Director of Community Development shall be empowered to make reasonable interpretations of the regulations and provisions of this chapter consistent with the legislative intent thereof. Any interested party may appeal an interpretation by the Director of Community Development. The Planning Commission will hear the appeal. Chapter 19.100 Parking Regulations is amended as follows 19.100.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate and to regulate parking of vehicles that are unsightly, oversized, or are detrimental to property values or the peace and enjoyment of neighboring property owners or residents establish regulations pertaining to the design and number of off-street parking spaces for land use activities located in various zoning districts. 19.100.020 Application of regulations. A. No vehicle may be parked, stored or kept on any parcel of land within the City of Cupertino otherwise than in conformm~ce with the provisions of this chapter. B. Buildings, structures and land uses are required to provide off-street parking in conformance with this chapter. The standards and regulations contained in this chapter regulate off-street parking for conventional zoning districts and are intended also as guidelines for development projects located in planned development (PD) zones and at congregate residences and residential care facilities. 19.100.030 Regulations for parking and keeping vehicles in various zones. A. Vehicles Permitted in Residential Zones. 1. Front or Street Side Setback Area. Vehicles are permitted to be placed, kept or parked in a front or street side yard setback area (as defined in Chapter 19.08.030 of this title) or within twelve feet of a public fight-of- way in a rear yard area in all residential zones subject to the following restrictions: a. A maximum of four vehicles are permitted on a lot in residential zone requiring a lot size often thousand square feet or less, a maximum of six vehicles are permitted in all other residential zones, unless a greater number is approved by the City in conjunction with a development plan. For purposes of counting vehicles, a camper mounted on a pickup truck is considered one vehicle and other similarly vertically stacked components which belong together shall be counted as a single vehicle. Horizontal groupings shall be counted as two vehicles; b. Any open vehicle containing trash or debris is prohibited; c. No portion of any vehicle may overhang any public right-of-way; d. All vehicles must be parked on an impervious or semi-pervious surface. Semi-pervious surfaces include unit pavers, turf block, brick, natural stone or cobbles and must allow for partial infiltration of water. Impervious surfaces include concrete, asphalt or any other surfaces that do not allow infiltration of water. Impervious surfaces max/not exceed forty percent of the front yard area. The combination of impervious and semi- pervious surfaces may not exceed sixty percent of the front yard All chi i .... · ~-~ parked .... area. 5' c c: ................. "':'~' ~ '~ .... ~ ..... * ~"- The parking impev,,,kms surface must be contiguous and, at a minimum, encompass the outline of the vehicle. e. All vehicles must be currently registered, where registration is required for legal operation and in good operating condition; f. Except on lots with circular driveways which conform to the provisions of this cOde, all vehicles parked in the front or street side yard setback area must be parked perpendicular to the street. On lots with circular driveways which conform to the provisions of this code, all vehicles parked in the front or street side yard setback area are limited to less than twenty feet in length, unless parked perpendicular to the street. Owners of vehicles made nonconforming by the adoption of this section shall comply with this provision within two years of its enactment. 2. Area Outside of Front or Street Side Setback Areas. Vehicles are permitted to be placed, kept, or parked in any yard area, excluding those yard areas regulated by Section 11.29.040 Al, provided a three-foot minimum clearance is maintained to any structure. 3. Parking Within Structures. Vehicles are permitted to be placed, kept or parked in any legal structure, provided that no more than one required enclosed parking space is occupied by a vehicle not capable of being propelled under its own power. 4. Non-Self-Propelled Vehicles. A maximum of two vehicles not capable of being propelled under their own power are permitted to be placed, kept or parked outside a legal structure on a lot. 5. Living or Sleeping Quarters. No vehicle shall be used for living or sleeping quarters, except as pern~.itted below: a. Vehicles located in a mobilehome park and used consistent with any City regulations applicable to mobilehome parks are permitted; b. Trailers, campers or recreational vehicles may be used by a bona fide guest of a City resident for a period not to exceed seventy- two hours where the trailer, camper or recreational vehicle is located on the resident's property. 6. Mobilehomes. Mobilehomes, excluding travel trailers, are not permitted within the residential zones of the City, except in a mobilehome park or as provided by State law. Vehicles Permitted in Nonresidential Zones. 1. Parking must be consistent with allowed uses in the zone. It is unlawful for any person to place, keep or maintain or permit to be placed, kept or maintained, any vehicle upon any lot, place or parcel of land within the nonresidential zones of the City, except for storage, sale or business use as permitted in such zones. 2. Construction Trailers. Trailers may be used for temporary offices on construction sites provided that a permit is obtained from the City Building Department after satisfactory information has been given that the use is in compliance with the conditions of this chapter. C. Loading and Unloading and Utility Vehicles. The provisions of this chapter are inapplicable to active loading or unloading of any vehicle or to any public service or utility company vehicles while in the performance of service or maintenance work. D. Parking on Vacant Lots. No vehicle may be parked, kept, or stored upon any vacant or unimproved parcel within the City. E. Other parking regulations shall be as outlined in Title 11 of the Municipal Code. 19.100.040 Regulations for off-street parking. A. Parking Ratio and Dimension. Table 19.100.040-A defines the required number of parking spaces by size and type for specific zoning districts and use within zoning districts. B. Aisle Dimensions. Aisle dimension shall be as required by standard details adopted by the City Engineer and shown in Table 19.100.040-B. C. Loading Areas. Loading areas, track parking spaces, and parking spaces: for vehicles other than automobiles shall have ample dimensions for the particular use and type of operation, and be designed or required by the City Engineer. D. Planned Development Districts. The parking requirement contained in Table 19.100.040-A functions as guidelines for projects in planned development zoning districts. Within such districts, the Planning Commission, or City Council may approve a development plan which deviates from Table 19.100.040-A requirements if an applicant provides a parking study which supports said deviation. E. Mixed-Use Projects Where more than one of the activities specified in Table 19.100.040-A is initiated in a building or on a site not requiring review by any committee, commission, or the City Council, the Director of Community Development shall determine the total parking requirement based upon the application of parking requirements for individual uses as described in Table 19.100.040-A. F. Shared Parking. 1. For proposed land uses which are less than or equal to five thousand square feet of commercial; ten thousand square feet of office and eight or less units of residential, a special parking study will not be required if all of the following may be demonstrated: a. The land use consists ora shopping center, office or industrial development which is owned or managed by a single entity; b. The land uses are under single management and in close proximity to each other and are served by a common parking facility; c. The proposed shared parking plan may be approved in conjunction with a conditional use permit application in a planned development zone or via an exception for a project which is not located in a planned development zone. d. The parking provided either meets or exceeds the standards for shared parking as described in Table 19.100.040-C. e. The shared parking plan is valid only as long as the mix of uses and their corresponding square footage (or seats/employees for restaurants) is the same as originally approved. 2. For all land uses not meeting the criteria set forth in subsection F1 of this section, the Planning Commission or City Council may approve a shared parking plan for a particular project whereby a parking space is utilized to serve two or more individual land uses under the following conditions: a. The land use consists of a shopping center, office or industrial development which is owned or managed by a single entity; b. The land use under single management are in close proximity to each other and are served by a common parking facility; c. The applicant has submitted a detailed parking study which demonstrates that the proposed use is compatible with the proposed parking supply. d. The proposed shared parking plan may be approved in conjunction with a conditional use permit application in a planned development zone or via an exception for a project which is not located in a planned development zone. Tandem, Valet and Other Special Parking Arrangements. Tandem, valet, and other special forms of parking may be approved in conjunction with a conditional use permit in a planned development zone or via an exception for a project not in a planned development zone. Minimum Stall Dimension in Parking Structure. The minimum stall dimension for a standard space located in a parking garage or other enclosed parking structure and intended for nonresidential uses is nine feet by eighteen feet. The minimum dimensions for a similarly situated compact space are eight feet by fifteen feet six inches. Handicapped Parking. The handicapped parking requirement embodied in Section 1129 B of the California Building Code, as amended, is hereby incorporated into this chapter by reference. Other regulations shall be as outlined in Title 11 of the Municipal Code. Residential Lots Fronting on Public or Private Streets. If no on-street parking is available, two additional c .... c,,~,:~n,, ;~ .... ~, · ................. ~ ..... v ........ off-street gpacc: :n ............. ~ ............. ~, .... are required. Farm Equipment. For tractors or farm equipment which are regularly parked on- site within two hundred feet of a public street or road, such parking places shall be screened from sight of the street. Large-Family Day Care Home. A minimum of one parking space per nonresident employee is required. This parking requirement shall be in addition to the minimum requirements of the zoning district. The parking space may be on-street, in front of the provider's residence. A minimum of one parking space shall be available for child drop-off. The space shall provide direct access to the unit, not crossing a street. If the provider is relying on on-street parking and the roadway prohibits on-street parking, a semi-circular driveway may be provided, subject to other provisions of the Municipal Code. N. Landscape Requirements. All new centers and centers with a twenty-five percent or greater increase in floor area or a twenty-five percent or greater change in floor area resulting from use permit or architectural and site approval within twelve months shall be required to meet the following minimum landscape requirements; however, the Planning Commission and/or City Council may recommend additional landscaping. 1.' Each unenclosed parking facility shall provide a minimum of interior landscaping in accordance with the following table: Min. Required Size of Interior Landscaping (% of Parking Facility (Sq, Ft.) Total Parking Facility Area) Under 14,999 5% 15,000 - 29,999 7.5% 30,000 plus 10% 2. Parking lot trees shall be planted or exist at a ratio of one tree for every five to ten parking stalls. Only fifty percent of the trees located along the perimeter of the parking area may count towards the required number of trees. When considering the number of trees per parking stall, the factors such as size of tree and canopy size shall be considered. A parking facility incorporating large trees with high canopies may provide one tree for every ten spaces whereas a parking facility with small trees would provide one tree for every five spaces. 3. All trees shall be protected by curbing or bollards as appropriate. 4. All landscape shall be continuously maintained. C. Bicycle Parking. Bicycle parking shall be provided in multi-family residential developments and in commercial districts. In commercial districts, bicycle parking shall be conveniently located and adjacent to on-site bicycle circulation pedestrian routes..The bicycle parking facilities shall be one of the following three classification types: 1. Class I Facilities. These facilities are intended for long-term parking and are intended to protect the entire bicycle or its individual components and accessories from theft. The facility also protects the cycle from inclement weather, including wind driven rain. The three design alternatives for Class I facilities are as follows: i. Bicycle Locker. A fully enclosed space accessible only by the owner or operator of the bicycle. Bicycle lockers must be fitted with key locking mechanisms. ii. Restricted Access. Class III bicycle parking facilities located within a locked room or locked enclosure accessible only to the owners and operators of the bicycle. The maximum capacity of each restricted room shall be ten bicycles. In multiple family residential developments, a common locked garage area with Class II parking facilities shall be deemed restricted access provided the garage is accessible only to the residents of the units for whom the garage is provided. iii. Enclosed Cages. A fully enclosed chain link enclosure for individual bicycles, where contents are visible from the outside, which can be locked by a user provided lock. This facility may only be used for multiple family residential uses. 2. Class II Facilities. Intended for short term parking. A stationary object which the user can lock the frame and both wheels with a user provided lock. The facility shall be designed so that the lock is protected from physical assault. A Class II facility must accept U-shaped locks and padlocks. Class II facilities must be within constant visual range of persons within the adjacent building or located at street floor level. 3. Class III Facilities. Intended for short-term parking. A stationary object to which the user may lock the frame and both wheels with a user provided cable or chain and lock. Spacing of the bicycle units shall be figured on a handlebar width of three feet, distance from bottom of wheel to top of handlebar of three feet and six inches and a maximum wheel-to-wheel distance of six feet. D. Parking Space Dimension Chart. Parking space dimensions shall be as shown in the following table: Table 19.100.040-A Land Use Zones Parking Bicycle Bicycle Standard Percent Compact Ratio Parking Parking Dimensions Compacts Dimensions (Gross Req. Class Square Feet) (8) Residential Single-Family R1/RHS 4/DU (2 A1 garage + 2 open) Single-Family RICR!C 2/U + 1.5 Cluster space for each bedroom after first bedroom Duplex R-2 3/DU (1-1/2 enclosed + 1- 1/2 open) Apartment R-3 2/DU (1 covered + 1 open) 10 x 20 ea. (1) (2) 10 x 20ea. (1) (2) 10 x 20 ea. (5) (1) (2) + 40% Class I 10 x 20 ea. 33 (5) (7) of units (1) (2) I Hiah Densitv, Multiple-Story Condominium Public/ Quasi-Public/ Agriculture Churches, Clubs, Lodges, Theaters Schools and School Offices Instructional Studios Agriculture Sanitariums and Rest Homes Private Recreation Gyms, Auditoriums, Skating Rinks without fixed seats Commercial Motels/Hotels/ Lodging Restaurant/Bar and Nightclubs R-3 BQ/CG BA/BQ BQ/CG A BQ FP BA/BQ CG CG 2/DU 1/4 seats + 1/employee + 1/special- purpose vehicle 1/employee + 1/56 sq. ft. mutlipurpose room + 8 visitor spaces/school + 1/3 students at senior H.S. or college level 1 per 150 sq. ft. of floor area 2 garage + 2 open 1/doctor + 1/3 employees + 1/6 beds 1/4 seats + 1/employee 1/56 sq. ft. floor area used for seating purposes + l/employee + 4O% of units 1/unit + +5% of 1/employee auto (2) (3) parking 1/3 seats + +5% of 1/employee + auto 1/36 sq. ft. of parking dnn~n flnnr Class I Class II Class II 10 x 20 ea. (1) (2) (5) (5) (1) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (7) (5) 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize (5) (7) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) (7) (5) Restaurants without Separate Bar CG 1/4 seats + +5% of 1/employee + auto 1/36 sq. ft. of parking dance floor Class II (5) 33 compact or 100 unisize (5) Restaurant - CG Fast Food Specialty Foods CG Bowling Alleys CG General CG Industrial Manufacturing ML Office/Prototype ML/OA Manufacturing Office Corporate / Administrative / General Multi- Tenant Medical and Dental Office Notes: CG/OP CG CG 1/3 seats + +5% of 1/employee auto parking 1/3 seats or +5% of 1/250 sq. ft. auto whichever is parking more 7/lane + +5% of l/employee auto parking 1/250 sq. ft. 1/450 sq. ft. 1/285 sq. ft. 1/285 sq. ft. 1/285 sq. ft. 1/175 sq. ft. +5% of auto parking +5% of auto parking +5% of auto parking +5% of auto parking +5% of auto parking Class II Class II Class II Class II Class I Class I Class I Class (5) (5) (5) (7) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) 33 compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize 5o (4) compact or 100 unisize 50 (4) compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize (5) (5) (5) (7) (5) (5) (5) (5) 15-'7'7 1. Enclosed garage. An internal area encompassing V::o one or more.parking spaces measuring ten feet by twenty feet each and shall pro:Sdc be unobstructed i.e., by walls, appliances, etc. between six inches from finished floor up to six feet from finished floor. 2. For ten or fewer dwelling units at least one garage space and one uncovered parking space per dwelling unit. For eleven or greater dwelling units at least one covered parking space and one uncovered parking space per dwelling units is required. 3. Guest parking for motels/hotels/lodging shall use a standard nine feet by eighteen feet stall dimension. Twenty-five percent of the required parking for employees and ancillary commercial space may use an eight feet by fifteen feet six inches compact space standard. 4. At least fifty percent of the floor area is devoted to manufacturing, assembly and/or warehousing. 5. Refer to standard details table for stall dimensions. 6. Refer to standard details table for requirements for handicapped parking. 7. See 19.100.040H for stall dimensions in parking structures. 8. See 19.100:0400 for description of bicycle parking classes. Table 19.100.40-B Parking Space Dimension Chart Type of Angle In Parking Degrees Stall Standard 0° 30° 35° 40° 45° 50° 55° 60° 65° 70° 90° Uni-Size 0° 30 ° 35 ° 40 ° 45 ° 50 ° 55 ° 60 ° 65 ° 713 ° Stall Aisle Aisle Car Width Width Width Space (A) I Way 2 Way Depth Aisle Aisle (C) (B) (a) 9.0 10.0 18.0 22.0 N/A 9.0 10.0 18.0 18.0 47.7 9.0 10.0 18.0 18.0 49.7 9.0 10.0 18.0 18.0 51.5 9.0 11.5 18.0 18.0 53.0 9.0 13.0 18.0 18.0 54.3 9.0 14.5 18.0 18.0 55.2 9.0 16.0 19.0 18.0 56.9 9.0 17.5 20.0 18.0 58.3 9.0 19.0 21.0 18.0 59.4 9.0 N/A 25.0 18.0 61.0 8.5 10.0 18.0 22.0 N/A 8.5 10.0 18.0 18.0 44.5 8.5 10.0 18.0 18.0 46.2 8.5 10.0 18.0 18.0 47.7 8.5 10.0 18.0 18.0 48.9 8.5 10.0 18.0 18.0 49.9 8.5 11.5 18.5 18.0 51.2 8.5 13.0 19.0 18.0 52.2 8.5 14.5 19.5 18.0 53.0 R.R ~Rn 9nh 1Rn RRF, Module, Module, Wall to Wall, Wall to Wall, 2 Way Aisle I Way Aisle (D) (D) N/A 39.7 41.7 43.5 46.5 49.3 51.7 53.9 55.8 57.4 N/A N/A 36.5 38.2 39.7 40.9 41.9 44.2 46.2 48.0 zl. cl R / 5 Compact 90° 8.5 N/A 22.0 18.0 53.0 N/A 0° 8.0 10.0 18.0 19.0 N/A N/A 30° 8.0 10.0 18.0 15,5 43.9 36.5 35° 8.0 10.0 18.0 15.5 43.9 38,2 40° 8.0 10.0 18.0 15.5 45.6 39.7 45° 8.0 10.0 18.5 15.5 47.1 40.9 50° 8.0 11.0 19.0 15.5 48,9 41.9 55° 8.0 12.5 19.5 15.5 50.5 44.2 60° 8.0 14.0 20.0 15.5 51.8 46.2 65° 8.0 15.5 20.5 15.5 52.8 48.0 70° 8.0 17.0 21.0 15.5 53.7 49.5 90° 8,0 N/A 23.0 15,5 54.0 N/A For handicap accessible spaces, please refer to Section 1118A.4 of 1994 Unifom~ Building Code. For further information, please refer to the Public Works Department Standard Detail Sheets. Table 19.100.040-C CALCULATING SHARED PARKING FOR MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENTS i WEEKDAY WEEKEND NIGHTIME Land Use Daytime Evening Daytime Evening (midnight- (9 a.m. - 4 p.m.) (6 p.m. - midnight) (9 a.m. - 4 (6 p.m. - 6 a.m.) p.m.) midnight) Office 100% 10% 10% 5% 5% Offici=!/Industrial Retail 60 90 100 70 5 Hotel 75 100 75 100 75 Restaurant 100 100 100 100 10 Entertainment/ 40 100 80 100 10 Recreational Instructions: t. 2. 3. 4. Determine the minimum amount of parking required for each land use as though it were a separate use; Multiply each amount by the corresponding percentage for each of the five time periods; Calculate the column total for each time period; The column total with the highest value is the parking space requirement. 19.100.050 Exceptions. findings: j 'fa, Exceptions to the parking ordinance may be granted as provided in this section. A. Issued by the Design Review Committee. 1. With respect to a request for a tandem garage to provide the minimum required enclosed parking in a residential zoning district, the Design Review Committee may grant an exception to allow the use of a tandem garage for required enclosed parking if the subject development meets all of the following criteria: a. The exception will not adversely affect neighboring properties by causing unreasonable numbers of vehicles to park on the neighboring properties or upon public streets. b. The tandem garage improves the overall design of the project. 2. The decision of the Design Review Committee to grant or deny an exception may be appealed subject to Chapter 19.136 except that the final decision will be made by the Planning Commission. B. Issued by the Planning Commission. 1. With respect to all other requests for parking exceptions, the Planning Commission may grant an exception if the subject development meets all of the following criteria: a. There are extraordinary conditions not generally applicable to similar uses which justify the exception (i.e., unusually high percentage of the lot area is landscaped); b. The exception departs from the requirements of this chapter to the minimum degree necessary to allow the proiect to proceed; c. The exception will not adversely affect neighboring properties by causing unreasonable numbers of vehicles to park on the neighboring properties or upon public streets. The decision of the Planning Commission to grant or deny an exception may be appealed to the City Council subject to Chapter 19.136. 19.100.060 Interpretation by the Planning Director. The Director of Community Development shall be empowered to make reasonable interpretations of the regulations and provisions of this chapter consistent with the legislative intent thereof. An interpretation by the Director of Community Development may be appealed by any interested party. The appeal will be heard by the Planning Commission. · Chapter 14.18 (Heritage and Specimen Tree) Section 14.18.060 C is amended as follows: Privacy protection planting in R-1 zoning districts shall be maintained. Landscape planting maintenance includes irrigation, fertilization and pruning as necessary to yield a growth rate expected for a particular species, um .... .~ ......... ,~,: ~,:~ .~:~ · _ EXHIBIT B Single Family Residential Design Guidelines REVISION Introduction a. Goals and Guiding Principles of Design Guidelines · Create harmonious homes in scale and design. · Allow for continued evolution of the city's housing stock. · Provide a speedy development process for the applicant. · Provide neighbors with input to the development process. General Plan Policies All projects must be consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan policies, including: Policy 2-15: Scale of Residential Development Ensure that the scale and density of new residential development and remodeling is reasonably compatible with the City's predominant single-family residential pattern, except in areas designated for higher density housing. Policy 2-18: Privacy in Site Design Ensure that the site design for a residential project has private indoor and outdoor spaces for each unit and common outdoor recreation space. Policy 2-19: Neighborhood Protection Protect residential neighborhoods from noise, traffic, light and visually intrusive effects from more intense developments with adequate buffering setbacks, landscaping, walls, activity limitations, site design and other appropriate measures. Policy 2-20: Minimizing Privacy Intrusion Keep the sights and sounds of the neighbors from intruding on residents. Techniques can include greater building setbacks, wing wails, window shutters and non-transparent glass. Objective New homes and remodel and addition projects offer a great opportunity to create a design that is harmonious with and enhances the neighborhood. However, for this to happen one must observe the existing neighborhood characteristics and incorporate them into their design. A special sensitivity must be shown in the design of two story homes, as they have a greater visual impact on the neighborhood. This visual impact may be greater when the two-story home is directly adjacent to single-story homes. To reduce the impact of new homes on the neighborhood, incorporate the scale, form and materials found in the neighborhood into the design. II. Neighborhood Compatibility Objective · To soften the transition between existing single story neighborhoods and new two-story development. · To improve the integration of new construction into existing neighborhoods. Problem · Architectural design of new two story homes may not account for scale, mass and bulk of existing homes in a neighborhood. · The design of new homes or remodels may not account for the neighborhood style with regard to materials and building forms. Solutions · Keep soil grade changes between properties to a minimum. · Set the first floor elevation as close to existing grade as possible, including the use of alternate footing designs. This does not include split-level portion of the house. · Balance the appearance of new two-story development with those of existing neighborhood by keeping similar architectural form, roof pitch, wall, eave and ridge heights. · For new two-story homes or two-story additions, use one-story elements at the edges to transition to neighboring single-story homes. · Where new two-story elements or homes are proposed adjacent to single story homes, position new two story windows to protect the privacy of backyard and living areas existing single story homes. This can be achieved by the use of skylights, clerestory windows, reducing the size of windows, raising the sill height of windows or installing louvers on windows. · Privacy t' ............................................... e, Second s~ory decks should be placed or desired so as not ~o offer direct views into adjacent proper~ living or backyard areas. Use solid railings instead of open railings and lattice and landscape scree~ng on sides o~ decks ~oward sideyards. · New consffuction should incorporate building ~orms, materials and finishes that are common in the neighborhood. · Use roo~ forms (hip~ gable, e~c.) ~ha~ are consis~en~ with neighborhood pa~ern. Gable-end roofs typically have more visual mass than hipped roofs, but ~hey are encouraged when i~ is appropriate for neighborhood compatibility. New construction should incorporate desi~ principles of sy~e~y and balance. III. Mass & Bulk Objective · To reduce the appearance of mass and bulk of new structures. Problem · New two story homes or additions having two story vertical walls appear more massive and bulky, due to lack of regard for building indentation, distance to adjacent buildings or impact to light/air to adjoining properties. · How to maintain the building square footage that the public wants but reducing the visible bulk of a building. Solutions · Keep visible second stories wall heights reduced to a minimum by burying them under the roof of the first story. · Reduce the height of walls and entry features to match the eave heights of homes in a neighborhood. · Use vaulted ceilings rather than high exterior walls to achieve higher volume spaces. · Use simple building and roof forms instead of overly complex forms. Too many hips and valleys, bays, etc. can create a busy appearance. · Continuous second-story walls should have building offsets to mitigate the potentially stark appearance. In cases where building offsets create overly complex roof forms, consideration should be given to the design that results in the best overall design. · Two-story wall planes should be avoided. Peter Gilli From: Jennifer Ediyanto [JEdiyanto@macrovision.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 5:00 PM To: peterg@cupertino.org Subject: Suggestions for Cupertino Planning Committee Peter, Here is a list of suggestions that I would like to propose to the Cupertino Planning Committee: 1 ) If a new two story home, or two story addition is being proposed, and any adjacent parcel is one story, then a public hearing for owners of all homes within 300 feet (the same current requirement if design review is required) will be required. A vote of council, following the hearing with inputs from affected neighbors, will be required for permitted construction. 2) If a new two story home, or two story addition is being proposed, and more than one adjacent property is one story, then in addition to the required design review and council hearing, a majority vote of all property owners within the 300 foot effect radius will be required to grant the second story construction. Note, those homes that do not attend the hearing will be counted as "yes" votes for the construction, putting the burden on the opposition to convince neighbors of the negative impact of the home. 3) In R-l, in computing minimum buildable lot sizes (6000 square feet or 5000 depending on zoning), land area for computation must not be "irregular." That is, flag lots or non-"compact" lot areas will not have "flag sticks" or other irregular areas counted in total square footage. 4) As in (2), when computing square footage to land ratios (35% rule), irregular, non-compact, or flag lots will not be allowed to use irregular pieces in overall land area. 5) To make lot line adjustments in line with California's new codes, no lot line adjustments will be granted with the effect that the total number of buildable units will be increased. Specifically, lot lines cannot be moved so that a parcel may be divided and a second home constructed. 6) In the event that a permit to build, or a design is being reviewed, said proposition must be posted at the specified site to alert neighbors of the pending possible construction. 7) In the event that privacy or line of site of neighbors is affected, privacy screening must be provided BEFORE any construction. If it is deemed to be impossible for trees to be placed due to viability issues, temporary screens must be provided. 8) If trees or other screens are required, they must be of a sufficient height AT PLANTING to provide immediate relief from the privacy invasion, and must provide complete final screening within one year of planting. 9) The city will require a consultant to perform field survey to the proposed construction site for ALL construction applications. Any fee incurred for this service should be pass on to the applicant. The above suggestions are very important to my husband and me. We suffer emotionally and financially because of a new 2-story building being constructed next to our backyard. This new construction was granted by the City of Cupertino Planning Committee under the current building regulations last year. Please find enclosed 5 JPEG pictures that show how this new construction effects us: lost of our privacy and decrease in our home value. Per a realtor estimate after seeing the new construction, our home has decreased from $1.2M to $800,000. It is an instant $400,000 loss in our 6 months investment into our new Creekline home! <<Creekline Front.jpg>> <<Creekline IntrusiveNeighbor.jpg>> <<Creekline_MasterBedroom.jpg>> <<Creekline_-MasterBathroom.jpg>> ~Creekline_Kitchen.jpg>> Regards, Jennifer Ediyanto 2/5/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: MCA-2002-03, EA-2002-15 Applicant: City of Cupertino Property Owner: Various Property Location: City-wide Agenda Date: January 13, 2003 Application Summary: Amendments to Chapter 19.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code and other sections of the code, if needed, related to changes to Single-Family Residential regulations. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. Discuss the proposed amendments and provide direction to staff. BACKGROUND At the Planning Commission meeting on November 25, 2002, the Commission suggested exploring significant changes to the R1 Ordinance, guidelines and procedures. The intent of these changes was to add flexibility to the development of single-family residences. Staff proposed a number of ordinance amendments at the November 25, 2002 meeting. The Planning Commission considered the following items favorably: · Reducing first-story setbacks on narrow lots to 5 feet on both sides, instead of 5 feet and 10 feet. · Increasing the side-setback for side,facing garages (attached or detached) on corner lots to 20 feet from 12 feet. · Allow tandem parking with an exception from the Design Review Committee, not the Planning Commission. · Apply second-story-setback-surcharge to the side-yards abutting rear-yards of neighboring properties. · Allow single-story residences to have one lightwell of a 10' x 10' size. · Apply high-volume area as second-story floor area ratio in two-story homes. · Place limitations on the extension of legal non-conforming building lines. · Require recordation of covenants for privacy planting. · Revise and relocate second-story deck regulations from the Accessory Structure ordinance to the R1 Ordinance. · Allow parking of vehicles on semi-pervious surfaces. · Adjust limits on impervious and semi-pervious surfaces in the front yard area. 15-1t7 MCA-2002-03 January 13, 2003 Page 2 The Planning Commission did necessary: · Apply a maximum floor not consider the following amendments to be area figure of 6,500 sq. ft. for a single-family residence. Reduce maximum permitted heights by two feet (single-story daylight plane, entry height, maximum height). Staff requests that the Comrnission revisit the single-story daylight place. The Plmming Commission wanted to discuss the following items further: · Reducing the parking requirement in the R1-5 zone from 4 to 2 (or 3) · Explore adding flexibility to the process. DISCUSSION Revisiting Height Limits Staff requests that the Planning Commission reconsider staff's proposal to limit the maximum wall height at the setback line to 10 feet instead of 12 feet. A resident submitted a photograph showing a new single-story house with a plate height of about twelve feet above natural grade. (See Exhibit A) The mass of the new residence is significant, and there are views from the new single-story house into the rear yard of this resident. Even with a 10-foot wall height, there will be visual impacts on neighbors, but less so than 12-foot wall heights. Reduced Parking Requirements The Planning Commission considered reducing on-site parking requirements in certain neighborhoods. Staff requests additional direction from the Commission on this issue. Providing Greater Flexibility The Planning Commission wanted to discuss the possibility of allowing greater design flexibility, and possibly easing some of the prescriptive regulations. Staff supports retaining the prescriptive regulations, because they are critical to ensuring that neighbors are protected from the visual impacts from insensitive applicants. Greater flexibility can be provided by allowing applicant to seek Design Review Committee approval only for those applications that do not meet the prescriptive regulations. All applications that meet the regulations with floor area ratios up to 45% could be approved at staff level. Staff Approval of Conforming Designs Most R1 applications to the Design Review Committee are for floor area ratios over 35%, but these projects otherwise conform to the R1 Ordinance. The vast majority of these conforming applications have been approved with very little controversy. Therefore, sending conforming applications to the Committee seems unnecessary. MCA-2002-03 January l3, 2003 Page 3 The following process could be used for approving conforming applications at staff level: · Staff level review for all two-story homes or additions with floor area ratios up to 45%, but otherwise conforming to the R1 Ordinance. · Mail notice and a reduced copy of the plan set to all adjacent neighbors. The notice would have a deadline for neighbors to provide comments to staff. · Require story poles and a "project announcement" sign on the subject site. The sign would have a contact number for the staff and a deadline for comments to be submitted. · Relevant neighborhood comments will be worked into the design. · The applicant will consider amending the project to reflect the comments. · The Director of Community Development will approve or deny the application. · The City Council, Planning Commission, applicant, adjacent property owners, and any other member of the public that is interested in the project will be mailed/e-mailed notification of the Director's decision and a reduced copy of the approved plans, similar to the current process with Director's Minor Modifications. · Appeals will go to the Design Review Committee. Design Approvals (Flexibili _ty from Regulations) Applicants and the public often perceive the exception process as negative. Coupled with the previous processing change, the exception process could be renamed "Design Approval," removing the negative connotation. This change would promote greater flexibility because the applicant and public would not perceive it as undesirable. The following process could be used for approving these applications at the Design Review Committee: · During the preliminary phase of the design process, staff will encourage applicants to explore variations from the prescriptive regulations when appropriate. · Require story poles and a posted notice on the front of the subject site, with contact information for the applicant and staff. · Public hearing notice sent to property owners within 300 feet of subject site. · The Design Review Committee will hold a public hearing and shall act on the project, as is done currently. · The focus of these "Design Approvals" would be whether the flexibility requested by the applicant results in a superior design and/or improved neighborhood compatibility. · The City Council, Planning Commission and applicant will be mailed/e- mailed notification of the Committee's decision. · Appeals would be heard by the Planning Commission. MCA-2002-03 January 13, 2003 Page 4 Prepared by: Approved by: Peter Gilli, Associate Planner Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developmen~ Attachments Exhibit A: Photograph illustrating the impact of tall single-story wall planes Planning Commission staff report and attachments from November 25, 2002 1 6 EXHIBIT ,4 10' Plate Height (12' above natural grade) 6' adult (for scale) ,hbor's grade (+ 1'0"- 1 '6") To Ms. Chen: ~lt~ ~.,(~. - ~(::k.~,Oq. - O'.~ Proposed Changes to R1 Ordinance ~ - ~ January 12, 2003 -RECEIVED JAN 1 $ 2003 I have tistened to the Planning Commission meeting of November 25, 2002 and to the proposed R1 ordinance changes proposed by Staff. I have comments on all the proposals, but I have limited my comments to just a few points. As a point of information, I have lived in Cupertino 16 years and built a new home in 2002 and was subjected to all the whims of the planning staff in 2001. In brief: I am against reducing plate heights to 10'. This would ultimately drive new homes to have ceiling heights of 8'. I am against reducing entry-level heights to 12'. So undramatic. I am against reducing overall height of buildings from 28' to 26' Planning Commission should reexamine the 35% second story rule. Cupertino is the only city to have this tight restriction. The FAR should dictate how large a second story should be, and the City should go back to second story setbacks that take away from a boxy look. The Planning Commission should reexamine the 25-degree daylight plan. It is too steep and limits buildability of the second story. It should be at least 45 degrees. The Planning Commission should be involved with the Public Works requirements of sidewalks. In the past every street was either a sidewalk or curb designation. The Public Works has newly instituted a requirement to build sidewalks for every new home (where sidewalks don't exist). This is quite unattractive - why only worry about compatibility at the height level and neglect the ground level where people walk? Reduce the public works requirements of bonds that can be as much as 8x more than the actual sidewalk or gutter cost. This is robbery. The current changes to the R1 ordinance are ALL staff driven and not community driven. I have a problem with this. I see the Planning Commission as representatives of the community who should set policy. Staff should then implement this policy. Instead in Cupertino this policy is backwards. Staff makes recommendations in the guise of "clarifications" and Planning Commission is snowed with so much information and lack of public input that they have trouble making a wise and valid decision and one that is based on public good. Something so important as R1 Design Rule Ordinance Changes are not even publicized to GAIN any public input whatsoever. The ones who have been most impacted by the new and proposed guidelines are not even asked for their opinions. Nobody has talked to the architects, the builders, and the applicants - the ones most affected. A major overhaul of the R1 ordinance took place in 1999. This had major implications for Floor Area Ratios and drastically reduced the size of homes that were being built. Barring the fact that these changes were already so severe, Staff in November 2000 proposed reducing plate heights and entry heights. The proposal of the reduction of reducing plate heights from 12' to 10' and reducing entry heights from 14' to 12' were brought up at that time. Currently, the overall house height restriction has been added. Again these proposed changes were staff driven. I find it very interesting that in Mr. Gilli's presentation on November 25 when discussing the homes that were brought into design review he stated, "all were asked to lower their wall plates." This indicates that all applicants read the ordinance AS it was WRITTEN yet, Mr. Gilli, in his interpretation requested that all lower their plate heights. The current ordinance regarding heights should remain the same without STAFF misguided interpretation of "matching your neighbor." The argument used by staff for these proposed changes is always the same "we need to be sensitive to the neighborhood" or we need "compatibility" or we need to "match your neighbor." I have real trouble with both of these words and with what they really mean. Most of today's new homes are built in neighborhoods that have larger lots or approx. 8,000 or more. While some new homes may go up in neighborhoods with smaller lots, the cost of the land, the restriotions (based on the FAR) just make building a brand new 2-story home prohibitive or illogical. Most of the neighborhoods with the larger lots (i.e. Garden Gate, Monta Vista, Foothill area) have homes that are approximately 50 years old. And, if anything there is no consistency in these homes whatsoever. These are not beautiful Victorians, or lovely bungalows, or craftsmen style, these are typically small ranch-style homes inexpensively built. For STAFF to say that we need to have "plate heights" that are "in-line" with these homes is strictly ludicrous. Compatibility from a staff point of view is limited strictly to plate height, plate height, and plate height. Simple roofs, simple roofs, simple roofs. Does "sensitivity" to the neighborhood only mean height restrictions?? I say "no." If 7 homes in a street of 14 have 75% of their frontages paved over, does that mean that I as a new homebuilder need to do the same? Well, in my neighborhood, 7 homes do have the majority of their frontages paved over and I personally find this "insensitive" and definitely not conducive to a "friendly" neighborhood atmosphere. In a newer development in Cupertino - Oak Valley - building began in 1999. About the same time as this strict ordinance came into play in Cupertino. But Oak Valley is anything but a "compatible" neighborhood if I use current staff guidelines. There are homes with plate heights of at least 20,. They go up vertically without any kind of indentation on the second story. There are single story homes next to 2® story homes. There are all types of homes styles - Prairie, English, Craftsmen, Spanish, Tudor and all with different outside materials including but not limited to stucco, wood siding, wood shingles. And roofs that have varied roof materials such as fiberglass, cement and tile. Because of the variability of the land, one's home plate height is very different from its neighbors. They are anything but consistent (and I would be happy to provide pictures for you). This neighborhood is quite attractive in my point of view but again with Cupertino's staff's definition it would be a totally incompatible neighborhood, because one house certainly does not match its neighbors in either design or in plate height. What is most pleasing in this neighborhood is something that I am surprised no planners or commissions have ever stated - they have beautiful front yard landscaping that is not dominated by large, boring lawns. There is nothing more pleasing than bushes and flowers that come all the way up to the sidewalk that greets the walker. The eye is drawn to the landscaping at eye level and not to the structures themselves. And, there are homes with 2 and 3 car garages MOST of them in line with the houses themselves, not hidden or tucked in behind the home for that would be quite impractical. I applaud the enactment of one tree per new home requirement, but I am surprised that there are "no recommendations" or no "encouragements" for developers to design friendlier landscaping in the front yard. Getting back to older neighborhoods in Cupertino that are quite popular and again would NOT meet today's rigid requirements one just has to look at the beautiful homes built by Debcor 15 years ago on Imperial Avenue and down at the end of Bollinger near Jollyman. Around Jollyman Park is another neighborhood built about 15 years ago - each home designed by separate architects and builders. They all have building heights of 28', wall plates OVER 12' and second stories that are definitely more than 35%. I think that building design should be progressive not regressive. Mr. Saadati and Ms. Chen both express desire for good design and flavor. Then shouldn't this be the focus of the committee to encourage these?? If the planners relegate all the decisions to staff, then they are negating their responsibility to the community. Another example of why I think the people of Cupertino do not like the new ordinances can be shown in the fight that the Garden Gate community took against annexation. More than 55% of the community residents were against annexation - primarily for the reaso, n that they preferred the laxer county building codes. Only when the City forced the fact that County would impose more stringent building requirements to the area, did the people give up. In regards to Design Review let me explain to you what happened in my case. It took 4 months to go through the Design Review process. My plans were sitting on somebody's desk for 1 month before they were sent out for outside review even though I followed up in a diligent manner. While the Planning Committee thinks that "story poles" are so easy to build, in my case it was quite expensive (approx. $7,000) and held me up for another month. My contractor had to rent a crane. How else was he going to put up 26' story poles in the middle of a yard unsupported by any structure? How could he wrap orange perimeter netting from one tall pole to another, climb a ladder? Since these poles went up during wintertime I had to be extremely careful that they didn't fall on the neighbors property. The last thing I needed was a lawsuit. I also had a problem getting approval by my surveyor because NO story pole is going to be exact and how exact does it need to be?? To a variable of, 1 ', 2'? Surveying is based on exactness, story poles are approximations so why do they need a surveyors stamp? While I was careful to have staff look at my preliminary plans, I have to say, that my wall height was lowered 3 times. My roofline was "simplified" 3 times. It was real easy for staff with a quick draw of a pen say, "reduce this". What they didn't have a clue on is the effect it had on the final outcome of my home, which I will get to later. The outside architect had NO issues with my height or my roofline etc., but again AFTER outside architect review Mr. Gilli lowered my heights more, reduced my ceilings, chopped my roofline. My house is anything but balanced. And as a result of this chopping, one of my bedrooms has a ceiling height of only 8' even though the plans called for 9'. The reason is quite simple. When you have a very pitched roof, one has to take into account all the structural elements that go below the roofline (all things not visible from the street). In my case, a major beam came across one bedroom and so the ceiling height had to be reduced to accommodate the beam. Again, the reason this happened is because the roofline was simplified. I do have to comment that my neighbor showed up at the hearing and later had complaints. Due to confidentiality issues I cannot say anymore in writing. I am telling you this because I am sure the fact that he complained twice during construction could come up if my particular project is discussed. I don't believe that my neighbor is typical. All of my other neighbors are quite pleased with my home and have commented as such. So don't be fooled by a statement from planning staff that a 26' house height allows for 9' plates on the second story. It just isn't so. Another point that I need to make which has nothing to do witki any current changes is the recordation of the plants and planting diagram. Around April 2002, a new ordinance came out again driven by staff that required that a covenant be recorded on title with the property's new plants and planting diagram. What was written at the time is that ONE couldn't get final Occupancy Permit until the HARD copy of the recordation came back from the County. In my case, it took 4 months to get this hard copy. I do not understand why real estate can be transferred from one party to another and the ACTUAL act of recordation is sufficient to take possession of a home. The time that a deed is recorded is the time that the new owner owns the home. Why is it that in Cupertino that is insufficient? Why has staff implemented a policy that is ABOVE and beyond what any homeowner has to undergo in buying a home. Again staff proposed this during my construction and I am not sure if it went into action. Another element, which you may not be familiar with, is that any homeowner who builds over 49% of their current home must add street improvements. These improvements are vague and subject to the mercy of public works. While this may be out of line of the planning commission it should be discussed that homebuilders need to put up a bond for 2 years. I year during the project development and then it takes another year to get the money back. In our case the city has $30,000 of our money. This was taken for "city improvement". Again our sidewalk cost in actual $4,000. Why does the city have to rob us of $30,000? I also hear that the City is requiring sidewalks where non have existed before and are "non-compliant" with homes that were built as recently as 6 months ago. Is this another way that the City plans to rob others of $30,000? I know the city has budget problems, but this is not the way. I have to tell you that Cupertino is known to be a "very unfriendly" environment in which to build. Builders/developers shun the city and homeowners are many times shocked at the rules because they don't know about them. Nobody wants to complain because doing so could jeopardize his or her project. And people who have already finished projects are so beaten up that they don't want to bring up the subject. New building brings revenues to the city; the local schools and is good for the local economy. Stifling restrictions bring about stagnation. Dialogue between city staff and the public is non-existent. Ordinances are passed without any public input. This has been the case since 1999. I do see a change with this current Planning Commission. Sincerely, Malka Nagel Camino Vista To: Planning Commission, City of Cupertino From: (Mr.) Jan Stoeckenius and Julia Tien 22386 Cupertino Road, Cupertino, CA tel/fax: 408 996 2064 email: kiwi@orimp.com Date: 11/25/02 Subj: comments on existing Ri ordinance and proposed amendment Section 19.28.060 B 3, Second floor/First floor 35% FAR (proposed modification of amendment) The existing Ri ordinance limits the second floor of a structure to 35% of the first floor. We believe this limitation is overly restrictive and is in many cases contrary to the goals of the Single Family Residential Design Guidelines referenced in 19.28.060 C 1. Our concerns cover several areas: a. Spreading of the house footprint Given an overall FAR of 45%, the 35% second floor to first floor FAR limits the size of the second floor to 11.67% of the lot size. Particularly for small lots, this space is too small to be useful for more than a couple of bedrooms. For the smallest conforming lots (6000 sq. ft.), it may be too small to be economical. Consequently, more of the house is pushed onto the first floor, resulting in a larger house footprint. It also results in more uniformity of footprint. For a standard 60' x 100' lot, for example, there is only one possible footprint (minimum setbacks on all sides) that provides a 45% FAR. We believe this encourages neither privacy or aesthetics. b. Energy efficiency Other things being equal, a house that minimizes exterior wall/roof area for a given volume will require less energy to both heat and cool. Hence, it is more energy-efficient to build compact two-story houses than spread-out single-story houses. Some compromises are necessary to avoid building unaesthetic boxes, but we feel that the other sections of 19.28.060 address these. c. Architectural diversity The new houses we have seen under construction in Cupertino are starting to look distressingly similar. The 35% second floor FAR does not directly enforce this similarity, but when combined with economic considerations, contributes to it significantly. d. Proposal We recommend that the second floor FAR, if kept at all, be increased to 70% (while retaining the overall 45% FAR). We believe this large increase is particularly important, as the proposed amendment would adds those areas of the first floor with a ceiling height of more than 15' to the second floor area as well. / 5- Page 1 Proposed height reduction we believe the proposed reduction in overall building height is ill-advised. The staff report includes logic that we find dubious. Specifically, the report states that over the past year, most projects have had heights of less than 26 feet. If this is the case, why is an ordinance change necessary? Providing the flexibility to build a house to 28 feet does not seem to be causing a problem. This restriction also causes significant problems with designs that have simple roof lines (for example, a single gable covering the entire house). Often, these designs look less massive, and certainly less busy, than complicated multi-plane roofs covering the same area. Allowance of a single garage The proposed amendment would reduce parking requirements for R1-5 zones to one covered and one uncovered space. While we agree with the desire to reduce the building frontage needed for a garage, we believe this clause is misguided. Nearly all families in Cupertino own at least two cars. Many, especially those with driving age children, may own three or more. For houses that have an occupied additional unit, such as is encouraged by a recent ordinance, there is usually at least one extra car associated with that unit. Many homes with two and three car garages use part or all of their garages for storage. This is particularly true for smaller houses, such as are found in the R1-5 zone. If only a single covered parking space is provided, it is likely that all covered parking will be used for storage. Since only a single uncovered parking space is mandated, at least one car will be parked on the street. For homes with limited frontage and on cul-de sacs, where wide driveway entrances limit available curbside parking to 50% or less of the curb length, we already see "creative" parking solutions with cars angle-parked to the curb, or parked in tandem on the driveway, often extending partially out into the street. We urge the city to retain the requirement for 2 covered and 2 uncovered parking spaces in all Ri zones. To avoid garage-dominated frontages, the city can encourage the use of tandem garages, as is common in many urban neighborhoods where street frontage is scarce. In particular, we recommend that Design Review committee approval be required for the use of other than tandem garages in the R1-5 zone. Public notifications (proposed addition to the amendment) This item is a procedural one not discussed in the staff proposal, but one that we believe is worth addressing as part of the amendment discussion for the Ri ordinances. On several occasions over the past 10 years, residents in our neighborhood have not been notified of hearings on applications to Page 2 daveloD or remodel DroDerties in the immediate vicinity. We understand that hearing notifications are only required for residents within 300 feet of the subject Droperty, and that the list of residents is provided by the applicant. Often, the applicant uses a database tha~ may not include current mailing addresses, and nearly always fails to include residents to who are renters. There may also be interested parties who are not within the 300 foot radius. We would like to propose that, in addition to the notification sent by mail, a notice be posted in a visible location on the property and, in the case of properties not directly fronting a street, at the street, as is currently required by the state for permits such as liquor licenses. A post approximately three feet high with a letter-size notice should be sufficient. Page 3 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: MCA-2002-03, EA-2002-15 Applicant: City of Cupertino Property Owner: Various Property Location: City-wide Agenda Date: November 25, 2002 Application Summary: Amendments to Chapter 19.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code and other sections of the code, if needed, related to changes to Single-Family Residential regulations. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. Recommend that the City Council enact Municipal Code Amendments based on the Model Ordinance attached as Exhibit A and the Single Family Residential Design Guidelines based on Exhibit B, or 2. Discuss the proposed amendments and continue discussion to December 9. BACKGROUND This item was introduced on November 12, 2002 but was not discussed in detail. The staff report and attachments for the November 12, 2002 Planning Commission meeting are attached. Prepared by: Approved by: Attachments Model Resolution Peter Gilli, Associate Planner Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developme~ Staff Report and Attachments from November 12, 2002 / :¢,./z.¢ - MCA-2002-03 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 MODEL RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND CHAPTERS 19.28, 19.80, 19.100 AND 14.18 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND REVISING THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES. Recommendation of approval is based on Exhibit A and Exhibit B as amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of November 2002 at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Charles Corr, Chairperson Plalming Commission 1 5..IZq CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: MCA-2002-03, EA-2002-15 Applicant: City of Cupertino Property Owner: Various Property Location: City-wide Agenda Date: November 12, 2002 Application Summary: Amendments to Chapter 19.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code and other sections of the code, if needed, related to changes to Single-Family Residential regulations. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: 1. Discuss the proposed amendments and continue discussion to November 25, or 2. Recommend that the City Council enact Municipal Code Amendments based on the Model Ordinance attached as Exhibit A and the Single Family Residential Design Guidelines based on Exhibit B. BACKGROUND Since the residential design review process started in 1999, staff and the Design Review Committee have gained a better understanding of what has been effective and what has not. The purpose of these amendments is to take what we have learned and improve upon the current regulations and guidelines. The goals and guiding principles of the design guidelines and the design review process, adopted by the City Council, are: 1. Create harmonious homes in scale and design. 2. Allow for continued evolution of the city's housing stock. 3. Provide a speedy development process for the applicant. 4. Provide neighbors with input to the development process. New regulations are based on these principles. items: Attached are drafts of the following Single Family Residential Design Guidelines · R1 Ordinance (Chapter 19.28) · Accessory Structure Ordinance (Chapter 19.80) · Parking Ordinance (Chapter 19.100) · Heritage and Specimen Tree Ordinance (Chapter 14.18) MCA-2002-03 November 12, 2002 Page 2 In all of these sections, significant new text is bolded and underlined. Non-bolded, underlined text is reworded or relocated sections. Strike-through is used for removed DISCUSSION Single Family Residential Design Guidelines The Single Family Residential Design Guidelines describes the intent of the design review process, and its relationship to the General Plan. Neighborhood compatibility has been an important issue in recent years. The following areas in the guidelines are recommended as additions or strengthened language (please see Exhibit B for the modified language): · Encourage compatible building and roof forms · Encourage compatible materials and finishes · Encourage one-story elements at the edges, especially next to single-story homes · Encourage compatible wall heights · Encourage simplified of building and roof designs · Discourage three-car-wide garages along the street frontage · Discourage garages that are more than half of the building frontage The attached draft guidelines do not have any graphics at this time. The graphics will be amended as the written guidelines are amended. Guidelines that simply repeat ordinance requirements were removed. RI Ordinance Amendments The majority of the work on the RI Ordinance has been rewording and relocating sections within the ordinance. The significant modifications are discussed below and are reflected in Exhibit D. Narrow Lots First Story Side Setback When Rancho Rinconada was annexed in 1999, 1,500 parcels were added to the City. At least 1,200 of those parcels are narrower than the City standard of 60 feet, and often are smaller than the City's minimum standard of 6,000 sq. ft. One change was made to the R1 Ordinance to accommodate these parcels. Lots with width less than 60 feet at the front setback line and less than 6,000 sq. ft. in area have reduced first story setbacks of 5 feet on each side yard. Most of the properties in Rancho Rinconada and some parcels in Monta Vista have widths less than 60 feet, but many lots are slightly larger than 6,000 sq. ft. in area (see Exhibit C). These properties would have side setbacks of 10 feet and 5 feet, resulting in 1 5-15/- MCA-2002-03 November 12, 2002 Page 3 a narrow house of between 35 and 45 feet. Staff believes that variable side setbacks would affect the cohesiveness of the neighborhood. There are pie-shaped lots in the City that may have widths less than 60 feet at the front setback line. These lots should not be allowed the reduced side-setbacks, since the lots widen at the rear. Staff recommends that the regulation be amended such that lots with an average width measured at the front and rear setback line of less than 60 feet are allowed to have 5- foot side-setbacks. The effect of this amended regulation would be that the Rancho Rinconada neighborhood would have consistent side-setbacks and pie-shaped lots would not benefit from this amendment. Garages & Parking Garages on corner properties When garages are proposed on the street side of a corner lot, the minimum setback is 12 feet. This is not sufficient to provide a driveway. Staff recormnends that the corner side-yard setback for a garage is 20 feet. This will be added to the Accessory Ordinance for detached garages. Rancho Rinconada Parking Due to the narrow lots in the Rancho Rinconada area, when new homes are proposed with two-car garages, the result is a building frontage that is dominated by the garage. To improve neighborhood compatibility, it is proposed that the off-street parking requirement in the R1-5 zone be reduced from 4 to 2, with one space enclosed. This would allow homes to be built with one-car garages that do not dominate the building frontage. Since many of the homes in the neighborhood have single-carports, there should not be significant parking impacts from having a reduced off-street parking requirement. If this change is approved, staff recommends that the area that would have been the second garage space (about 220 sq. ft.) be subtracted from the allowed floor area. Thus, the neighborhood is not given a bonus in square footage by the reduction in the parking requirement. Tandem Parking Currently, when a tandem garage is proposed to fulfill the required off-street parking, it requires a parking exception from the Planning Commission. Staff recommends that · the Design Review committee review the parking exception for residential tandem garages. 15-1 z MCA-2002-03 November 12, 2002 Page 4 Second Story Surcharge on Key Lots When the side of a second story abuts a rear yard of another single-family residence (referred to as a key lot), staff recommends that 10 feet of the required 15-foot setback surcharge be applied to that side. This will ensure that residents will have at least a twenty-foot setback to a new two-story house or addition. Heights The R1 Ordinance presently allows design elements in new homes that conflict with neighborhood compatibility guidelines. As a result, staff and the applicant spend considerable pre-application time working on revisions to the proposed plan set. These revisions result in increased costs to the applicant and increased time in the development process, which conflicts with the guiding principles of the design review process. Staff recommends amending the ordinance to be more consistent with the intent of the design guidelines. One important element of neighborhood compatibility is single-story wall heights and roof-eave lines. Older ranch-style homes in the City have single-story wall heights and eave lines that are less than 10 feet above grade. Most applicants for new houses desire high-volume interior areas and propose single-story wall heights at the 12-foot maximum. Through the design review process, staff consistently recommends that single-story wall heights and eave lines be reduced to be compatible with the adjacent homes, and the Design Review Committee has supported this on numerous occasions. There is some frustration from applicants when they are directed to modify their plans to conform to the Design Guidelines, when the ordinance allows greater heights. Staff recommends that the maximum single-story wall height be lowered from 12 feet to 10 feet from grade. Exceptions should be considered to go up to 12 feet in cases where the adjacent house has higher wall heights. Along with compatibility of wall heights at the edges of the development, staff focuses on reducing the overall height of two-story homes to less than the ordinance maximum of 28 feet. Over the past year, the majority of design review projects have had building heights less than 26 feet. This is achieved by reducing plate heights, especially on the second story; using vaulted ceilings on the second floor to achieve high-volume areas; and using footing designs that lower the first-story floor height. In keeping with the proposed reductions in height limits by two feet, staff recommends that the maximum ridge height of an entry feature be reduced from 14 feet to 12 feet. Basements To provide an incentive to build single-story homes, City Councilmembers have requested some flexibility for below grade patios for basements. Presently, lightwells can only be as large as necessary to meet Uniform Building Code requirements. MCA-2002-03 November 12, 2002 Page 5 Staff proposes allowing single-story homes one lightwell can be 10' x 10'. The lightwell will still have to conform to setbacks. Staff believes the flexibility provided should be limited to prevent excessive grading and too much impervious coverage in the rear yard. Larger lightwells are permitted if the basement area counts as floor area. Miscellaneous High-Volume Area Interior areas with floor to ceiling heights greater than fifteen feet are counted twice as floor area. Staff has consistently interpreted that high volume area over fifteen feet is applied to the second story as well as the first story. Staff recommends that this be explicitly added to the ordinance. Maximum Floor Area There are some R1 properties in the hillside that are between a half-acre and one-acre in size. Using the floor area ratio of 45%, a 10,000 to 20,000 sq. ft. residence could be built. These properties are exceptions to the rule. The majority of R1 properties in the City are between 5,000 and 10,000 sq. ft. in area. However, for these exceptional properties, staff recommends adding a maximum floor area figure of 6,500 sq. ft., which is consistent with the Residential Hillside zone. Extension of Building Lines All residential zones have a process for the extension of a legal non-conforming building line. Extensions of legal non-conforming building lines only apply to single- story additions. These situations occur when a building is constructed either under older regulations or in a different jurisdiction. Much of the single family residences east of the Union Pacific railroad line and south of Stevens Creek Boulevard were built in either Santa Clara County or in the City of San Jose. Many of these homes are legal non-conforming side-yard setbacks. Without this regulation, any addition to the house must conform to the setbacks. When homeowners wanted to make a minor addition to a room with a nonconforming setback, they would have to have a "jog" in the wall. The intent of the extension regulation is to allow expansion of existing homes without having a wall and roof offset. The extension regulation has been used to take a nonconforming wall and extend it for as much as fifty feet. Also, homeowners have sometimes increased the height of the nonconforming wall. Some homeowners propose a complete rebuild except for keeping one wall (a noncomplying wall). Then, the noncomplying wall is extended. Currently, in order to extend a legal building line, you must receive approval from the affected neighbor. All other zones do not require neighbor approval. In hindsight, MCA-2002-03 November 12, 2002 Page 6 requiring neighbor approval is not advised. There are possibilities of neighbor disagreements that would result in subjective application of this rule. Staff believes the application of this regulation results in adverse impacts that were not intended by the adoption of the regulation. Also, neighbor approval should not be required. Staff proposes the following changes: · Continue to permit extension of non-conforming building lines. · Limit the extension to a total of 10-20 feet. Staff does not have a specific recommendation for the limit at this time. · Increases in wall height are not permitted. · Neighbor approval is not required. Given the limit in the extension length, and prohibition of height increases, staff believes that the use of this regulation would not be objectionable to a reasonable person. Accessory Structure Ordinance The following are the changes to the Accessory Structure ordinance: · Remove Section 19.80.030 A(1)(i), which allows second story decks to encroach into the front setback, since the spirit of the City's regulations in recent years has been to push second story elements back from the first-story wall plane. Allowing a second-story deck to encroach into the front setback would bring second story elements more to the front, and would increase visible mass when viewed from the street. · Add a regulation that the minimum street-side yard setback for a detached garage shall be twenty feet. · Move R1 second-story deck regulations to the R1 Ordinance from the Accessory Structure Ordinance. · Add Director's interpretation section. Tree Ordinance A redundant section is removed from the Section 14.18.060 C. located in the R1 Ordinance. The information is Parking Regulations The following are the changes to the Parking ordinance. · Vehicles may be parked on semi-pervious surfaces. Currently, vehicles must park on impervious paved surfaces. · No more than 40% of the front yard may be covered with impervious surfaces. Currently, the code allows 50% of the front setback to be paved. · No more than 60% of the front yard may be covered by a combination of semi- pervious and impervious surfaces. MCA-2002-03 November 12, 2002 Page 7 · R1-5 zone parking requirement reduced from 4 to 2. Thus, a one-car garage and one driveway space will fulfill the parking requirement. · When tandem garages are proposed to fulfill the parking requirement in residential zones, the item will be heard by the Design Review Committee instead of the Planning Commission. · Add Director's interpretation section. Impervious Surface Coverage Limiting the amount of paved area on a property is an important regional issue to reduce storm-water runoff to the Bay, as described in "Start at the Source," a publication by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association. Efforts to improve on-site retention of storm water through infiltration are supported by the City's Environmental Services Division of the Public Works Department. Prepared by: Approved by: Peter Gilli, Associate Planner ~ Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developmen't~ ..... Attachments Model Resolution Exhibit A: Model Ordinance Exhibit B: Draft Revised Single Family Residential Design Guidelines Exhibit C: R1 Parcels by Lot Area Exhibit D: Overview of Ordinance Changes Recommendation of Environmental Review Committee Initial Study MCA-2002-03 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 MODEL RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND CHAPTERS 19.28, 19.80, 19.100 AND 14.18 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND REVISING THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES. Recommendation of approval is based on Exhibit A and Exhibit B as amended. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of November 2002 at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Charles Corr, Chairperson Planning Commission EXHIBIT A Proposed text is underlined. Deleted text is struck through. MODEL ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO, AMENDING CHAPTERS 19.28, 19.80, 19.100 AND 14.18 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICPAL CODE REGARDING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Chapter 19.28 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R1)t..f° -~ x ZONES 19.28.010 19.28.020 19.28.030 19.28.040 19.28.050 19.28.060 19.28.070 19.28.080 19.28.090 19.28.100 19.28.110 19.28.120 19.28.130 19.28.140 Purposes. Applicability of regulations. Permitted uses. Conditional uses. General e:,~ a ....~ ..... Development reRulations - Eichler (Rl-e). Landscape Requirements Second Story Decks ~ Per~tted Yard encroachment. Residential design approval. ~~ pti R ........... dcs:gn approval. 19.28.110 Discretionary Review Procedures. Procedure f~r 19.28.120 Interpre~tion by the Planning Director. 19.28.010 Purposes. R1 Single-Family Residential Districts R 1 s~nglc family rcg':dcncc d':gtr'ict: are intended to create, preserve and enhance areas suitable for detached dwellings in order to: A. Enhance the identity of residential neighborhoods; B. Ensure provision of light, air and a reasonable level of privacy to individual residential parcels; C. Ensure a reasonable level of compatibility in scale of structures within residential neighborhoods; D. Reinforce the predominantly low-intensity setting in the community; 19.28.020 Applicability of regulations. No building, structure or land shall be used, and no building or structure shall be hereafter erected, structurally altered or enlarged in an R1 Single-Family Residential District R 1 ..... o .......v ................. t other than in conformance with the provisions of this chapter and other applicable provisions of this title. 19.28.030 Permitted uses. The following uses shall be permitted in the R1 Single-Family Residential District R 1 A. Single-family use; B. A second dwelling unit conforming to the provisions, standards and procedures described in Chapter 19.82, except for those second dwelling units requiring a conditional use permit; C. Accessory facilities and uses customarily incidental to permitted uses and otherwise conforming with the provisions of Chapter 19.80 of this title; D. Home occupations in accordance with the provisions of ;;'~,cn accessory tc pcr,,'mt ,,~,~ ............ ccnta:ncd ~n Chapter 19.92; E. Horticulture, gardening, and growing of food products for consumption by occupants of the site; F. Residential care facility that is licensed by the appropriate State, County agency or department with six or less residents, not including the provider, provider family or staff; G. Small-family day care home; H. The keeping of a maximum of four adult household pets, provided that no more than two adult dogs or cats may be kept on the site; I. Utility facilities essential to provision of utility services to the neighborhood but excluding business offices, construction or storage yards, maintenance facilities, or corporation yards; J. Large-family day care home, which meets the parking criteria contained in Chapter 19.100 and which is at least three hundred feet from any other large- family day care home. The Director of Community Development or his/her designee shall administratively approve large day care homes to ensure compliance with the parking and proximity requirements; K. Congregate residence with ten or less residents. 19.28.040 Conditional uses. The following uses may be conditionally allowed in the R 1 Single-Family Residential District R i ~:-~'~ .... ~,.~ faw213 .... .~o,~..~:~ .... ~.~L..~,a:~'":~ subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit: A. Issued 1. 2. B. Issued 1. by the Director of Community Development: Temporary uses, subject to regulations established by Chapter 19.124; Large-family day care home, which otherwise does not meet the criteria for a permitted use. The conditional use permit shall be processed as provided by Section 15.97.46(3) of the State of California Health and Safety Code; 3. Buildings or structures which incorporate solar design features that require variations from setbacks upon a determination by the Director that such design feature or features will not result in privacy impacts, shadowing, intrusive noise or other adverse impacts to the surrounding area; 4. Second dwelling units which require a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 19.84; 5. Home occupations requiring a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 19.92 of this title. by the Planning Commission: Two-story structures in an area designated for a one-story limitation pursuant to Section 19.28.060 E£2) of this chapter, provided that the Planning Commission determines that the structure or structures will not result in privacy impacts, shadowing, or intrusive noise, odor, or other adverse impacts to the surrounding area; 2. Group care activities with greater than six persons; 3. Residential care facility that is not required to obtain a license by the State, County agency or department and has six or less residents, not including the providers, provider family or staff; 4. Residential care facility that has the appropriate State, County agency or department license and seven or greater residents, not including the provider family or staff, is a minimum distance of five hundred feet from the property boundary of another residential care facility; 5. Residential care facility that is not required to obtain a license by the State, County agency or department and has seven or greater residents, not including the provider family or staff, is a minimum distance of five hundred feet from the property boundary of another residential care facility; 6. Congregate residence with eleven or more residents~_which is a minimum distance of one thousand feet from the boundary of another congregate residence and has a minimum of seventy-five square feet of usable rear yard area per occupant. 19.28.050 Generalo..~e:'" ~.'~ .... · ~.vt....*...~ ..... ' regulations. A. Lot Area Zoning Designations. 1. Minimum lot Lot area shall correspond to the number (multiplied by one thousand square feet) following the R1 R 1 zoning symbol. Examples are as follows: Zoning Symbol Number Minimum Lot Area in Square Feet R.._~I 5 5,000 R1 R4 6 !6,000 R1 R ! 7.5 7,500 R1 R-l- 10 10,000 R1 R ! 20 20,000 2. Lots that have, which ccntaln less area than required by Section 19.28.050 A(1), but not less than five thousand square feet, may nevertheless be used as building sites, provided that all other applicable requirements of this title are fulfilled. B. Lot Width. The minimum lot width shall be sixty feet measured at the front-yard setback line, except in the R1-5 district where the minimum lot width is fifty feet. C. Development on Slopes of Thirty Percent or Greater. 1. Site plans for all development proposals shall include topographical information at contour intervals not to exceed ten feet. Areas where slopes are thirty percent or greater shall be identified on the site development plan. 2. Buildings proposed on a portion of a lot with slopes of thirty percent or greater shall be developed in accordance with the site development and design standards specified in Sections 19.40.050 through 19.40.140 of the Residential Hillside ordinance, Ghapter49A~, or Chapter 19.28, the-R-4 ....... ~ ................ },~,... 19.28, whichever specific regulation is more restrictive. 3. No structure or improvements shall occur on slopes of thirty percent or greater unless an exception is granted in accordance with Section 19.40.140, unless no more than five hundred square feet of development, including grading and structures, occurs on an area with a slope of thirty percent or greater. 19.28.060 Development Regulations.~v.r ~, ... ......... · ~- -s~, ~...n.~:.....~...~, .... o~.~..~..o,+~'~""~ ..~.sht A. Lot Coverage. The maximum lot coverage shall be forty-five percent of the net lot area. B. Floor Area Ratio. 1. The maximum floor area ratio of all structures on a lot shall be forty-five percent, but in no case shall the total floor area exceed 6,500 sq. ft. a. In the case of a lot in the R1-5 zone with a single-car garage, the maximum potential floor area on the lot shall be reduced by two hundred twenty square feet. 2. Any new ..... .... story house with more than one story, or o,~,,,,~ .... ~ o,,~j ...... addition above the first story to an existing house, resulting in a floor area ratio o~ thirty-five percent or greater shall be approved by may .not cauae Review Co.tree pursuit to Section 19.28.090. T .......... ~. .... ~ 3. The m~imum floor area of a second story shah be thi~g-five percent of the existing or proposed first stor_ oor area ...................... ~t~D~ or six hundred squ~e feet, w~chever is greater. 4. Interior buildin~ ar~a with floor to ceiling heights ~reat~r than fiReen feet shall be added to the second stor~ floor ar~a unless the house is single-story. Design 1. Guidelines. Any new two-story house, or second-story addition to an existing house, shall be gener consistent with the .~vv ....... e ........ : ........... ~ Single Family Residential Design Guidelines. The Director of Community Development shall review the project and shall determine that the following items are met prior to issuance of building permits: a. The mass and bulk of the design shall be reasonably compatible with the predominant neighborhood pattern. New construction shall not be disproportionately larger than or out of scale with the neighborhood pattern in terms of building forms, wall heights, roof pitches, eave heights, ridge heights, and entry feature heights; b. The design shall use vaulted ceilings rather than high exterior walls to achieve higher volume interior spaces; c. For projects with three-car garages oriented to the public right- of-way, the wall plane of the third space shall be set back a minimum of two feet from the wall plane of the other two spaces, or shall incorporate a tandem space. There shall not be a three- car wide driveway curb cut. If the Director does not find that the proposal is generally consistent with this section, then an application must be made for design approval from the Design Review Committee pursuant to Section 19.28.090. D. Setback--First Story (Nonaccessory Structures). 1. Front Yard. The minimum front yard setback is twenty feet; provided, that for a curved driveway the setback shall be fifteen feet as long as there are no more than two such fifteen-foot setbacks occurring side by side. o Side Yard. At least one of two side yard setbacks must be no less than ten feet, with the. The other side yard setback m'ast 5c no less than five feet~ a. The ~nimum side-yard setback for the street-side of a comer lot shall be twelve feet. The minimum interior side setback for a comer lot shall be five feet. b. The minimum side-yard setbacks for a lot with an average width less than sixty feet measured at the front and rear setback lines shall be five feet on each side yard. c. The minimum side-yard setback for a garage on the street- side of a corner lot shall be twenty feet. Rear Yard. The minimum rear yard setback is twenty feet. The rear setback may be reduced to ten feet if, after the reduction, the usable rear yard area is at least net !c:s t~an twenty times the lot width as measured from the front setback line. E. Setback--Second Floor (Nonaccessory Structures). 1. The minimum front and rear setbacks are twenty-five feet. 2. The minimum side setbacks are ten feet, except as follows, v ....... t~at a. The minimum side setback from a street-side property line is twelve feet. b. The minimum side setback for a flag lot is twenty feet. 3. Setback Surcharge. An additional fifteen feet of A o~,~v a: ........... ~ ,~ c.c,~ c~ d-s ory setback shall be required a. The total surcharge shall be added to the front and side setbacks in any combination, except that at least five feet shall be applied to the second-story side setbacks. b. In the case of a side-yard adjacent to a rear yard of another single-family residential property, ten feet of the surcharge shall be applied to that side. Accessory Buildings/Structures. Chapter 19.80 governs setbacks, coverage and other standards for accessory structures. The visible height of second story walls are regulated as follows: a. Fifty percent of the total perimeter length of second story walls shall not have exposed wall heights greater than six feet, and shall have a minimum two-foot high overlap of the adjoining first story roof against the second floor wall. The overlap shall be structural and shall be offset a minimum of four feet from the first story exterior 4' m~. Ful! h~i~t At least 4'-0" bo All visible second story wall heights ~ ............ ~:~ ..... o~,~,~ .,, .................. ~ ............... , are requ re to have building wall offsets at least every twenty-four feet. with a minimum two-foot depth and six-foot width. The offsets shall comprise the full height of the wall plane. less than 24' less than 24' Illja. less than 24' c. All second story roofs shall have a minimum of one-foot eaves. G. Additional Site 1. Height. a. Basements. 1. The number, size and volume of lightwells, stairwells and basement windows and doors shall be the minimum required by the Uniform Building Code for emergency egress, light and ventilation. 2. Maximum size of a lightwell or stairwell for a basement: a. Depth may be a maximum of six inches below the floor level of the basement; b. Length, as measured parallel to the basement wall, may be one foot more than the minimum width of a basement door or window providing light, air and ventilation to the basement. In the case of a stairwell, this regulation applies to the length of the landing. c. Width, as measured perpendicular between the basement wall and the lightwell or stairwell retaining wall, shall be three feet. d. In the case of a single-story house, one lightwell or stairwell may have a length and width of ten feet. 3. Setbacks. No part of a basement, stairwell or lightwell retaining wall may encroach into the following ..... setbacks ..... ~ a. The minimum front setback shall be twenty feet~ b. The minimum side setback for n . ..,, .................. ~ .....shall be five feet; c. The minimum rear setback for a · -~ .................. 6 .....shall be ten feet. 4. No part of a basement, stairwell or lightwe]l retainin~ wail may encroach into the drip line of a specimen tree or required privacy .tree. 6. Railings for stairwells and lightwells that are visible from a public street shall be no higher than three feet in height and shall be located immediately adjacent to the stairwell or lightwell. 7. The perimeter of t~c basement, stairwell and at~ lightwell retaining walls shall be treated and/or reinforced with the most effective root barrier measures, as determined by the Director of Community Development. Requirements. The maximum building ..................... ~ .... ~ ........ height of any principal dwelling i~an-R4-ztme shall m3Vexeeed-b_~e twenty-six twenty ~:-~+ ~.~,,~ feet, not including fireplace chimneys, antennae or other appurtenances. The height may be increased to twenty-eight feet through an exception process if the height of the principal dwelling is compatible with adjacent residences. bo The maximum exterior wall height and building height em of single-story structures and single-story sections of two-story structures shall must fit into a building envelope defined by: a. A ten-foot ~ high vertical line measured from natural grade and located at the side-setback line~ b. A twenty-five-degree roof line angle projected inward at the ten-foot ~ high line referenced in Section 19 28 060 G(1)(b)(i) ~"~' .... :~ r:, ~.: AC ~'.~ .... C. The building envelope may be increased in height by two feet through an exception process if the wall heights of the principal dwelling are compatible with the adjacent homes. Notwithstanding the above, a gable end of a roof cncl~,g~ng an attic ~pacc may have a maximum wall height of eighteen twenty feet to the peak of the roof as measured from natural grade. 2. Heights exceeding eighteen v, ve~-y feet shall be subject to the setback regulations in Section 19.28.060 E ............ E .... :~ 3. Areas Restricted to One Story. The City Council may prescribe that all buildings within a designated area be limited to one story in height (not exceeding eighteen feet) by affixing to the R1 R 1 zoning district, the designation "i" provided: however, that the limitation may be removed through use permit approval, as provided in Section 19.28.040_B by the Planning Commission. 4. The maximum ridge height of an entry feature ~: ~' .... e~ shall be twelve feet. No blank single-story side walls longer than sixteen feet shall face a public right-of-way without at least one of the following: (a) at least one offset a. At least one offset with a minimum two-foot depth and six-foot width; the offset shall comprise the full height of the wall plane; b. Window of at least thirty inches by thirty inches; c. Entry feature leading to a door; d. Trellis with landscape screening. eo 19.28.070 Development regulations--Eichler (RI-e). Rl-e Single-Family Residential Eichler Districts protect a consistent architectural form through the establishment of district site development regulations. Regulations found in the other sections of this chapter shall apply to properties zoned Rl-e. In the event of a conflict between other regulations in this chapter and this section, this section shall prevail. Nothing in these regulations is intended to preclude a harmonious two-story home or second story addition. Setback--First Story. 1. The minimum front yard setback is twenty feet. Building Design Requirements. 1. Entry features facing the street shall be integrated with the roof line of the house. 2. The maximum roof slope shall be 3:12 (rise over mn). 3. Wood or other siding material located on walls facing a public street (not including the garage door) shall incorporate vertical grooves, up to six inches apart. 4. The building design shall incorporate straight architectural lines, rather than curved lines. 5. Second story building wall offsets described in Section 19.28.060 E(5)(b) are not required for homes in the Rl-e zone. 6. The first floor shall be no more than twelve inches above the existing grade. 7. Exterior walls located adjacent to side yards shall not exceed nine feet in height measured from the top of the floor to the top of the wall plate. C. Privacy Protection Requirements. Side and Rear Yard Facing Second Floor Windows. In addition to other privacy protection requirements in Section 19.28.080, the following is required for all second story_ windows: a. Cover windows with exterior louvers to a height of six feet above the second floor; or b. Obscure glass to a height of six feet above the second floor; or c. Have a window sill height of five feet minimum above the second floor. 19.28.080 Landscape Requirements A. Privacy Protection. To mitigate privacy impacts and the visual mass and bulk of new two-story homes and additions, tree and/or shrub planting is required. This section is.applicable only to new two-story homes, two- story_ additions, or modifications to existing windows on existing two- story homes that increase privacy impacts on neighboring residents. The intent of this section is to provide substantial screening within three years of the planting. 1. Applicability. This requirement shall apply to second story windows and decks with views into neighboring residential yards. Skylights, windows with sills more than five feet above the finished second floor, windows with permanent, exterior louvers up to six feet above the finished second floor, and obscured, non-openable windows are not required to provide privacy protection planting. 2. Privacy Planting Plan. A building permit application for a new two-story house or a second story addition shall be accompanied by a privacy planting plan which identifies the location, species and canopy diameter of existing and proposed trees or shrubs. a. New trees or shrubs shall be required on the applicant's property to screen views from second-story windows. The area where planting is required is bounded by a thirty- degree angle on each side window jamb. Secon~ Floor b. New trees or shrubs are not required to replace existing trees or shrubs if an Internationally Certified Arborist or Licensed Landscape Architect verifies that the existin~ trees/shrubs have the characteristics of privacy planting species, subject to approval by the Director of Community Development. c. Waiver. These privacy mitigation measures may be modified in any way with a signed waiver statement from the affected property owner. Modifications can include changes to the number of shrubs or trees, their species or locations. d. Affected property owner(s) may choose to allow privacy planting on their own property. In such cases, the applicant must plant the privacy screening prior to issuance of a building permit. e. The trees or shrubs shall be planted prior to issuance of a final occupancy permit. The Planning Division shall maintain a list of allowed privacy planting trees and shrubs. The list shall include allowed plant species, minimum size of trees and shrubs, expected canopy or spread size, and planting distance between trees. Covenant. The property owner shall record a covenant with the Santa Clara County Recorders Office that requires the retention of new privacy planting, or use of existing vegetation as privacy planting, prior to receiving a final building inspection from the Building Division. This regulation does not apply to situations described in Section 19.28.060 H(4d). Maintenance. The required plants shall be maintained. Landscape planting maintenance includes irrigationl fertilization and / 5-15/- Bo pruning as necessary to yield a growth rate expected for a particular species. 6. Replacement. Where required planting is removed it must be replaced within thirty days with privacy tree(s) of ~imilar size as the tree(s) being replaced, unless it is determined to be infeasible by the Director of Community Development '-':+~' Front-Yard Tree Planting. Applicants for new two-story homes and two- story additions must plant a tree in front of new second stories in the front yard setback area. The tree shall be 24 inch-box or larger, with a minimum height of six feet. The Director of Community Development can waive this front-yard tree if there is a conflict with existing mature tree canopies on-site or in the public right-of-way. 19.28.090 Second Story Decks A. All new or expanded second story decks with views into neighboring residential side or rear yards are must obtain an exception approval in accordance with Section 19.28.120 in order to protect the privacy of adjoining properties. The goal of the exception requirement is not to require complete visual protection but address privacy protection to the greatest extent while still allowing the construction and use of an outdoor deck. This section applies to second-story decks, patios, balconies, or any other similar unenclosed features. 1. A second-story deck or patio may encroach three feet into the front setback for the principal dwelling. 2. The minimum side-yard setback shall be five feet more than th~ minimum side-yard setback for the second-story. 3. The minimum rear-yard setback shall be twenty feet. 19.28.100 'a ~Q aa ........ 9 Permitted yard encroachments. A. Where a building legaily constructed according to existing yard and setback regulations at the time of construction encroaches upon present required setbacks j .... .... ~, one encroaching wall ~ may be extended along its existing building lines, for a maximum distance of ten feet, as long as the extension or addition does not further encroach into the required setback and the heigh! of the extended wall is not increased, to no.~oo~ r ,~.~,,.~.~. ,~.~,,~ .~c~ ..~,.c .... ~,~ propcny ...... t,.~nt. In no case may the wall plane be located closer than three feet to any property line. Only one such extension shall be permitted for the life of such building. This section applies to the first story only and shall not be construed to allow the further extension of an encroachment by any building, w~ic~ that is the result of the granting of a variance, either before or after sUch property become part of the City. C. ~chitectural features (not including'patio covers) may extend into a required y~d a dist~ce not exceeding t~ee feet, provided that no ~chitectur~ feature or combination thereof, whether a potion of a principal or auxili~ structure, may extend closer than t~ee feet to ~y property line. 1 ........Residential design approval. 19.28.110 n ~o nan In the event that a proposed development of two stories exceeds a thirty-five percent floor area ratio as prescribed in Section 19.28.060 B, or in the event that the Director of Community Development finds that the proposed two-story development does not conform to Section 19.28.060 C, the applicant shall apply to the Design Review Committee for design approval to allow for the development; provided, however, in no event shall such application exceed a forty-five percent floor area ratio. In addition to the public hearing and notice requirements described in Section 19.28.130, at least ten days prior to the date of the public hearing, the applicant shall install story poles to outline the proposed building exterior walls and roof as further described by procedures developed by the Director of Community Development. The Design Review Committee may approve a Design Review application if all of the following findings are made: A. The project will be consistent with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan, any applicable specific plans, zoning ordinances and the purposes of this title. B. The granting of the special permit will not result in a condition that is detrimental or iniurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. C. The proposed addition/home is harmonious in scale and design with the general neighborhood. D. The proposed addition/home is generally consistent with design guidelines developed by the Director of Community Development. E. The proposed addition/home will not result in'significant adverse visual impacts as viewed from adjoining properties. 19.28.120 19.28.100 Where results inconsistent with the purpose and intent of this chapter result from the strict application of the provisions hereof, exceptions to Sections 19.28.060 and 19.28.109 080 may be granted as provided in this section. A. Issued by the Director of Community Development. With respect to a request for two-story development which does not meet the development requirements Bo Co contained in Section 19.28.080 19.2g.OSOH (Privacy Protection Requirements) and Section 19.?,,.10OC 19.28.060 C (Design Guidelines), the Community Development Director may grant an exception to allow two-story development if the subject development, based upon substantial evidence, meets all of the following criteria: 1. The literal enforcement of this chapter will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this chapter. 2. The proposed development will not be injurious to property or improvements in the area nor be detrimental to the public safety, health and welfare. 3. The proposed development is otherwise consistent with the City's General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and with the purposes of this chapter. 4. The adjoining properties are otherwise protected from unreasonable privacy impacts. Issued by the Design Review Committee (Design Regulations).~v,,,~,fr~'~' ....... v ........ ~ ..... ~ ......... ). The Design Review Committee may grant exceptions from the prescriptive design regulations described in Section 19.28.060,,.,,~ '~ ,~,,.~L.e ~,1 ^~ ~ ~.~. ~ ~ a ~ o ~ aa exclusive of Section 19 .28 .060 F( 1 ) (Basements) and G(3) (Single-Story Overlay) ~a ,o ~ ~u:no:~ ~,,:~:~ ~upon m~ng ~1 of the following findings: 1. The literfl enforcement of the provisions of this chapter will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit ~d intent of t~s chapter. 2. The grating of the exception will not result in a condition that is materially detrimentfl to the public health, safety ~d welf~e. 3. The exception to be grated is one that will require the le~t modification of the prescribed design regulation ~d the ~nimum v~i~ce ~at will accomplish the pu¢ose. 4. The proposed exception will not result in signific~t visual impact as viewed from abutting properties. Issued by the Design Review Committee (Second Story Decks). The Design Review Committee may grant exceptions to allow second story decks upon making all of the following findings: 1. The deck design decreases privacy impacts by minimizing the sensitive views into adjoining yards to the greatest extent possible. 2. The deck design is compatible with the architectural style of the primary structure. Issued by the Planning Commission (Hillside Building Heights). Notwithstanding any provision of Section 19.28.060 G(1) to the contrary, the Planning Commission may grant an exception for heights to exceed twenty-eight feet upon making all of the following findings: 1. The subject property is in a hillside area and has slopes of ten percent or greater. 2. Topographical features of the subject property make an exception to the standard height restrictions necessary or desirable. 3. In no case shall the maximum height exceed thirty feet for a principal dwelling or twenty feet for an accessory building. 4. In no case shall the maximum height of a structure located on a prominent ridgeline, on or above the four hundred fifty-foot contour exceed twenty- eight feet. lc thc ~' 3 inches :.pax. Ex ..................... j 1 5-155 - 19.28.130.,.,v...,,m ,,Q ~ ~a Discretionary, Review Procedures. A. Public Hearing--Notice. Upon receipt of an application for approval, the Director of Community Development shall set a time and place for a public hearing before the releVant decision-maker and order the public notice thereof. A notice of the hearing shall be sent by first class mail to all owners of record of real property (as shown in the last tax assessment roll) within three hundred feet of the subject property. ................. ~ r ....... ~r ............ r ............... r~' ..... 3hall C. Decision. After closing the public hearing, the decision-maker shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application. D. Appeal. Interested parties may appeal any discretionary decision regardinE regulations contained in this Chapter. All decisions regarding approvals contained in this section may be appealed by any interested party pursuant to Chapter 19.136. An appeal of the Design Review Committee decision shall be processed in the same manner as an appeal from the decision of the Director of Community DevelopmenL except that the final decision on the appeal will be made by the PlanninF Commission. E. Expiration of an Exception or Residential Design Approval. A decision for approval which has not been used within one year following the effective date thereof, shall become null and void and of no effect unless a shorter time period shall specifically be prescribed by the conditions of the exception. An approval shall be deemed to have been used when a complete building permit application is submitted to th~ Chief Building Official, and continues to progress in a diligent manner. In the event that the building permit application expires, the Residential Design Approval shall ecome nu an v. n -vv .......... ,,~ ...... - t~ .... : ............. :_. a:~: .......... The Di f C ity De elop .......................... 5 ............. *. rector o ommun v ment may grant a single eric .~a:.:~ .......... one-year extension without public notice and hearing upon the receipt of a written request justifying the extension, if an /5 Concurrent Applications. Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter to the contrary, an application for exception or rc3idcnt:.a! design review may, at the discretion of the Director of Community Development, be processed concurrently with other land use approvals. 19.28.140 n ~e lan · 1 ........ Interpretation by the Planning Director. ~-RM-z~aesw~he The Director of Community Development shall be empowered to make reasonable interpretations of the regulations and provisions of this chapter consistent with the legislative intent thereof. An interpretation by the Director of Community Development may be appealed by any interested party. The appeal will be heard by the Pla ing Corn issio Delete and incorporate into a separate handout. 15-157 Chapter 19.80 (Accessory Buildings/Structures) is amended as follows: 19.80.030 Site development regulations. General Regulations. Except as otherwise provided in this section, accessory buildings shall at all times be located in conformance with requirements for principal buildings, and shall not be located in any required front, sides, or rear yard setback area. A. Residential and Agricultural Zones. In residential and agricultural zoning districts, accessory buildings and structures may be located in a required interior yard, subject to the following restrictions: 1. With respect to accessory buildings and structures (including decks and patios) which are attached to principal dwellings, all site development regulations, including setbacks, height and lot coverage regulations applicable to principal dwellings in the applicable zone also govern attached accessory buildings/structures except as otherwise specified below: a. Ground level paving, landscape features, lightwells, stairwells leading to a basement, and open recreational facilities are excluded from lot coverage regulations, applicablc zc, ne n~ .............~,~ .......... c. ~ Attached accessory buildings/structures ghall be structurally integrated with the principal dwelling, d. Unenclosed patio covers may extend as close as ten feet to the rear property line, e. Attached recreational structures which have a floor or step height greater than eighteen inches above any point of the adjOining finished grade, must have a minimum setback of ten feet from any property line, f. In agricultural zoning districts attached accessory buildings/structures which are used solely for agricultural uses are not restricted as to height, provided that such buildings/structures are of a design and height usual for that purpose. g. First-floor decks and patios, other than described in subsection Ble of this section, may encroach to within three feet of a property line, h. First-floor decks and patios may encroach three feet into front- yard setbacks, j. Second story decks in R1 R 1 zoning districts are regulated by Section 19.28.090 44:gOX¢~, With respect to detached accessory buildings/structures (including an R2 R 2 zoning district): a. In R 1 R1, RHS, A and A 1 A1 zones: i. The area of an accessory building/structure, not including garage space, shall be limited to the gross building area as per Section 19.84.030 D. ii. Basements in detached accessory buildings/structures shall count as floor area, and shall be subject to the regulations in Easement ~:~*'*,-,~'~ ~-~" ~cA.~ ,~ Section 19.28.060 F. iii. Detached accessory buildings with living space shall conform to Chapter 19.84. b. The maximum lot coverage is thirty percent of the useable rear yard area; c. The minimum distance from a principal dwelling is five feet (measured between the eaves); d. Small, portable storage buildings and air conditioning units less than six feet in height, which are not attached to a building, permanent foundation, or pad, may be located closer than five feet to a principal dwelling, but no closer than three feet from any property line; e. No detached accessory building or structure shall be located less than three feet from any property line; f. Detached accessory buildings and structures shall be limited to a single story and shall not exceed a height of seven feet beginning at a three-foot setback from rear or side property lines. The height encompasses the entire wall plane nearest the property line, including the roof, eaves, and any portion of the foundation visible above the adjoining finished grade. The wall plane height may be increased by one foot for each additional one and one- half feet of setback (corresponding to a thirty-three-degree angle), up to a maximum wall plane height of fifteen feet, as depicted in the diagram attached to the ordinance codified in this title. The maximum height of construction shall not exceed twenty feet; g. Walls which are less than five feet to a property line may not have windows or if windows are installed they must be obscured glass or have the sill height above five feet from the floor. This requirement shall not apply to skylight or windows which face a right-of-way or a nonresidential zoning district; h. Detached recreational buildings/structures which have a floor or step height greater than eighteen inches above any point at the adjoining finished grade, must have a setback of ten feet from any property. An affixed play structure, such as a swing or climbing apparatus, is allowed in the setback area if it is at least three feet from the property line and if it exceeds the heights and setbacks as required in subsections B2b and c of this section and meets one of the two following conditions: It is adjacent to a corner property line, or, if not on a coruer, the immediately adjacent property owner agrees to the location prior to construction; i. The minimum front-yard setbacks for detached accessory buildings/structures are: i. Twenty feet in residential zones; ii. Thirty feet in agricultural zones. j. With respect to coruer lots, the street-side yard setback shall be fift fe pt t b 1 .... ~.~. c,~ ~ ..... .~ ~ ~ een et, exce :mus eno ................................. i. Twenty feet in the event that the coruer lot is adiacent to a key lot; ii. Twenty feet for a garage or carport. k. In R2 and R3 R 2 and R 3 zones, in the case of an interior lot abutting only one street, no detached accessory building or structure, except a detached garage, may occupy the front fifty percent of the lot area. 19.80.050 Interpretation by the Planning Director. The Director of Community Development shall be empowered to make reasonable interpretations of the regulations and provisions of this chapter consistent with the legislative intent thereof. An interpretation by the Director of Community Development may be appealed by any interested party. The appeal will be heard by the Planning Commission. Chapter 19.100 Parking Regulations 19.100.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate and to regulate parking of vehicles that are unsightly, oversized, or are detrimental to property values or the peace and enjoyment of neighboring property owners or residents establish regulations pertaining to the design and number of off-street parking spaces for land use activities located in various zoning districts. 19.100.020 Application of regulations. A. No vehicle may be parked, stored or kept on any parcel of land within the City of Cupertino otherwise than in conformance with the provisions of this chapter. B. Buildings, structures and land uses are required to provide off-street parking in conformance with this chapter. The standards and regulations contained in this chapter regulate off-street parking for conventional zoning districts and are intended also as guidelines for development projects located in planned development (P~) zones and at congregate residences and residential care facilities. 19.100.030 Regulations for parking and keeping vehicles in various zones. A. Vehicles Permitted in Residential Zones. 1. Front or Street Side Setback Area. Vehicles are permitted to be placed, kept or parked in a front or street side yard setback area (as defined in Chapter 19.08.030 of this title) or within twelve feet of a public right-of- way in a rear yard area in all residential zones subject to the following restrictions: a. A maximum of four vehicles are permitted on a lot in residential zone requiring a lot size of ten thousand square feet or less, a maximum of six vehicles are pemfitted in all other residential zones, unless a greater number is approved by the City in conjunction with a development plan. For purposes of counting vehicles, a camper mounted on a pickup truck is considered one vehicle and other similarly vertically stacked components which belong together shall be counted as a single vehicle. Horizontal groupings shall be counted as two vehicles; b. Any open vehicle containing trash or debris is prohibited; c. No portion of any vehicle may overhang any public right-of-way; d. All vehicles must be parked on an impervious or semi- pervious surface. Semi-pervious surfaces include unit pavers, turf block, brick, natural stone or cobbles and must allow for partial infiltration of water. Impervious surfaces include concrete, asphalt or any other surfaces that do not allOw infiltration of water. Impervious surfaces may not exceed forty percent of the front yard area. The combination Of impervious and semi-pervious surfaces may not exceed sixty percent of the front yardarea. ·^ The parking imperv~c~:s surface must be contiguous and, at a minimum, encompass the outline of the vehicle. e. All vehicles must be currently registered, where registration is required for legal operation and in good operating condition; f. Except on lots with circular driveways which conform to the provisions of this code, all vehicles parked in the front or street side yard setback area must be parked perpendicular to the street. On lots with circular driveways which conform to the provisions of this code, all vehicles parked in the front or street side yard setback area are limited to less than twenty feet in length, unless parked perpendicular to the street. Owners of vehicles made nonconforming by the adoption of this section shall comply with this provision within two years of its enactment. Area Outside of Front or Street Side Setback Areas. Vehicles are permitted to be placed, kept, or parked in any yard area, excluding those yard areas regulated by Section 11.29.040 Al, provided a three-foot minimum clearance is maintained to any structure. Parking Within Structures. Vehicles are permitted to be placed, kept or parked in any legal structure, provided that no more than one required enclosed parking space is occupied by a vehicle not capable of being propelled under its own power. Non-Self-Propelled Vehicles. A maximum of two vehicles not capable of being propelled under their own power are permitted to be placed, kept or parked outside a legal structure on a lot. Living or Sleeping Quarters. No vehicle shall be used for living or sleeping quarters, except as permitted below: a. Vehicles located in a mobilehome park and used consistent with any City regulations applicable to mobilehome parks are permitted; b. Trailers, campers or recreational vehicles may be used by a bona fide guest of a City resident for a period not to exceed seventy- two hours where the trailer, camper or recreational vehicle is located on the resident's property. 6. Mobilehomes. Mobilehomes, excluding travel trailers, are not permitted within the residential zones of the City, except in a mobilehome park or as provided by State law. B. Vehicles Permitted in Nonresidential Zones. 1. Parking must be consistent with allowed uses in the zone. It is unlawful for any person to place, keep or maintain or permit to be placed, kept or maintained, any vehicle upon any lot, place or parcel of land within the nonresidential zones of the City, except for storage, sale or business use as permitted in such zones. 2. Construction Trailers. Trailers may be used for temporary offices on construction sites provided that a permit is obtained from the City Building Department after satisfactory information has been given that the use is in compliance with the conditions of this chapter. C. Loading and Unloading and Utility Vehicles. The provisions of this chapter are inapplicable to active loading or unloading of any vehicle or to any public service or utility company vehicles while in the performance of service or maintenance work. D. Parking on Vacant Lots. No vehicle may be parked, kept, or stored upon any vacant or unimproved parcel within the City. E. Other parking regulations shall be as outlined in Title 11 of the Municipal Code. 19.100.040 Regulations for off-street parking. A..Parking Ratio and Dimension. Table 19.100.040-A defines the required number of parking spaces by size and type for specific zoning districts and use within zoning districts. B. Aisle Dimensions. Aisle dimension shall be as required by standard details adopted by the City Engineer and shown in Table 19.100.040-B. C. Loading Areas. Loading areas, track parking spaces, and parking spaces: for vehicles other than automobiles shall have ample dimensions for the particula~ use and type of operation, and be designed or required by the City Engineer. D. Planned Development Districts. The parking requirement contained in Table 19.100.040-A functions as guidelines for projects in planned development zoning districts. Within such districts, the Planning Commission, or City Council may approve a development plan which deviates from Table 19.100.040-A requirements if an applicant provides a parking study which supports said deviation. E. Mixed-Use Projects Where more than one of the activities specified in Table 19.100.040-A is initiated in a building or on a site not requiring review by any committee, commission, or the City Council, the Director of Community Development shall determine the total parking requirement based upon the application of parking requirements for individual uses as described in Table 19.100.040-A. F. Shared Parking. 1. For proposed land uses which are less than or equal to five thousand square feet of commercial; ten thousand square feet of office and eight or less units of residential, a special parking study will not be required if all of the following may be demonstrated: a. The land use consists of a shopping center, office or industrial development which is owned or managed by a single entity; b. The land uses are under single management and in close proximity to each other and are served by a common parking facility; c. The proposed shared parking plan may be approved in conjunction with a conditional use permit application in a planned development zone or via an exception for a project which is not located in a planned development zone. d. The parking provided either meets or exceeds the standards for shared parking as described in Table 19.100.040-C. e. The shared parking plan is valid only as long as the mix of uses and their corresponding square footage (or seats/employees for restaurants) is the same as originally approved. 2. For all land uses not meeting the criteria set forth in subsection F1 of this section, the Planning Commission or City Council may approve a shared parking plan for a particular project whereby a parking space is utilized to serve two or more individual land uses under the following conditions: a. The land use consists of a shopping center, office or industrial development which is owned or managed by a single entity; b. The land use under single management are in close proximity to each other and are served by a common parking facility; c. The applicant has submitted a detailed parking study which demonstrates that the proposed use is compatible with the proposed parking supply. d. The proposed shared parking plan may be approved in conjunction with a conditional use permit application in a planned development zone or via an exception for a project which is not located in a planned development zone. G. Tandem, Valet and Other Special Parking Arrangements. Tandem, valet, and other special forms of parking may be approved in conjunction with a conditional use permit in a planned development zone or via an exception for a project not in a planned development zone. H. Minimum Stall Dimension in Parking Structure. The minimum stall dimension for a standard space located in a parking garage or other enclosed parking structure and intended for nonresidential uses is nine feet by eighteen feet. The minimum dimensions for a similarly situated compact space are eight feet by fifteen feet six inches. I. Handicapped Parking. The handicapped parking requirement embodied in Section 1129 B of the California Building Code, as amended, is hereby incorporated into this chapter by reference. J. Other regulations shall be as outlined in Title 11 of the Municipal Code. K. Residential Lots Fronting on Public or Private Streets. If no on-street parking is available, two additional ~ .... c. .... :~.~,,., :.~ ....~., ...... ................ ; .....v ........ off-street ov ....in ............. · ~ ............. paces are required. L. Farm Equipment. For tractors or farm equipment which are regularly parked on- site within two hundred feet of a public street or road, such parking places shall be screened from sight of the street. M. Large-Family Day Care Home. A minimum of one parking space per nonresident employee is required. This parking requirement shall be in addition to the minimum requirements of the zoning district. The parking space may be on-street, in front of the provider's residence. A minimum of one parking space shall be available for child drop-off. The space shall provide direct access to the unit, not crossing a street. If the provider is relying on on-street parking and the roadway prohibits on-street parking, a semi-circular driveway may be provided, subject to other provisions of the Municipal Code. N. Landscape Requirements. All new centers and centers with a twenty-five percent or greater increase in floor area or a twenty-five percent or greater change in floor area resulting from use permit or architectural and site approval within twelve months shall be required to meet the following minimum landscape requirements; however, the Planning Commission and/or City Council may recommend additional landscaping. 1. Each unenclosed parking facility shall provide a minimum of interior landscaping in accordance with the following table: Min. Required Size of Interior Landscaping (% of Parking Facility (Sq. Ft.) Total Parking Facility Area) Under 14,999 5% 15,000 - 29,999 7.5% 30,000 plus 10% 2. Parking lot trees shall be planted or exist at a ratio of one tree for every five to ten parking stalls. Only fifty percent of the trees located along the perimeter of the parking area may count towards the required number of trees. When considering the number of trees per parking stall, the factors such as size of tree and canopy size shall be considered. A parking facility incorporating large trees with high canopies may provide one tree for every ten spaces whereas a parking facility with small trees would provide one tree for every five spaces. 3. All trees shall be protected by curbing or bollards as appropriate. 4. All landscape shall be continuously maintained. Bicycle Parking. Bicycle parking shall be provided in multi-family residential developments and in commercial districts. In commercial districts, bicycle parking shall be conveniently located and adjacent to on-site bicycle circulation pedestrian routes. The bicycle parking facilities shall be one of the following three classification types: 1. Class I Facilities. These facilities are intended for long-term parking and are intended to protect the entire bicycle or its individual components and accessories from theft. The facility also protects the cycle from inclement weather, including wind driven rain. The three design alternatives for Class I facilities are as follows: i. Bicycle Locker. A fully enclosed space accessible only by the owner or operator of the bicycle. Bicycle lockers must be fitted with key locking mechanisms. ii. Restricted Access. Class III bicycle parking facilities located within a locked room or locked enclosure accessible only to the owners and operators of the bicycle. The maximum capacity of each restricted room shall be ten bicycles. In multiple family residential developments, a common locked garage area with Class II parking facilities shall be deemed restricted access provided the garage is accessible only to the residents of the units for whom the garage is provided. iii. Enclosed Cages. A fully enclosed chain link enclosure for individual bicycles, where contents are visible from the outside, which can be locked by a user provided lock. This facility may only be used for multiple family residential uses. 2. Class II Facilities. Intended for short term parking. A stationary object which the user can lock the frame and both wheels with a user provided lock. The facility shall be designed so that the lock is protected from physical assault. A Class II facility must accept U-shaped locks and padlocks. Class II facilities must be within constant visual range of persons within the adjacent building or located at street floor level. 3. Class III Facilities. Intended for short-term parking. A stationary object to which the user may lock the frame and both wheels with a user provided cable or chain and lock. Spacing of the bicycle units shall be figured on a handlebar width of three feet, distance from bottom of wheel to top of handlebar of three feet and six inches and a maximum wheel-to-wheel distance of six feet. D. Parking Space Dimension Chart. Parking space dimensions shall be as shown in the following table: Table 19.100.040-A Land Use Residential Single-Family Zones Parking Bicycle Bicycle Ratio Parking Parking (Gross Req. Class Square Feet) (8) R1/RHS 4/DU (2 A1 garage + 2 open) Standard Percent Compact Dimensions Compacts Dimensions 10 x 20 ea. (1) (2-) Sinqle-Famil¥ R1-5 Single-Family RICRIC Cluster Duplex R-2 Apartment R-3 Hiqh Density~ Multiple-Story Condominium Public/ Quasi-Public/ Agriculture Chumhes, Clubs, Lodges, Theaters Schools and School Offices Instructional Studios Agriculture Sanitariums and Rest Homes Private Recreation R-3 BQ/CG BA/BQ BQ/CG A BQ FP 2/DU (1 ~ara(~e + 1 open) 2/U + 1.5 space for each bedroom after first bedroom 3/DU (1-1/2 enclosed + 1- 1/2 open) 2/DU (1 covered + 1 open) 2/dU 1/4 seats + 1/employee + 1/special- purpose vehicle 1/employee + 1/56 sq. ft. mutlipurpose room + 8 visitor spaces/school + 1/3 students at senior H.S. or college level 1 per 150 sq. ft. of floor area 2 garage + 2 open 1/doctor + 1/3 employees + 1/6 beds 1/4 seats + 1/employee + 4O% of units + 4O% of units Class I Class I 10 x 20 ea. 10 x 20 ea. (1) (2) 10 x 20 ea. (1) (2) 10 x 20 ea. (1) (2) 10 x 20 ea. (1) (2) (5) (5) (1) (5) (5) (5) 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 (5) (5) (7) (5) (7) (5) (5) (5) (5) (5) Gyms, Auditoriums, Skating Rinks without fixed seats Commercial Motels/Hotels/ Lodging BNBQ CG Restaurant/Bar CG and Nightclubs 1/56 sq. ft. floor area used for seating purposes + 1/employee 1/unit + +5% of 1/employee auto (2) (3) parking 1/3 seats + +5% of 1/employee + auto 1/36 sq. ft. of parking dance floor Class II Class II (5) (5) (7) (5) 33 33 compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize (5) (5) (7) (5) Restau rants without Separate Bar CG 1/4 seats + +5% of 1/employee + auto 1/36 sq. ft. of parking dance floor Class (5) 33 compact or 100 unisize (5) Restaurant - CG Fast Food Specialty Foods CG Bowling Alleys CG General CG Industrial Manufacturing ML Office/Prototype ML/OA Manufacturing Office 1/3 seats + +5% of 1/employee auto parking 1/3 seats or +5% of 1/250 sq. ft. auto whichever is parking more 7/lane + +5% of 1/employee auto parking 1/250 sq. ft. 1/450 sq. ft. 1/285 sq. ft. +5% of auto parking +5%of auto parking +5%of auto parking Class II Class II Class II Class II Class I Class I (5) (5) (5) (7) (5) (5) 33 compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize 33 compact or 100 unisize 50 (4) compact or 1 O0 unisize 5O (4) compact or 1 O0 unisize (5) (5) (5) (7) (5) (5) Corporate / Administrative / General Multi- Tenant Medical and Dental Office Notes: 1. CG/OP 1/285 sq. ft. +5% of Class I (5) 33 (5) auto compact parking or 100 unisize CG 1/285 sq. ft. +5% of Class I (5) 33 (5) auto compact parking or 100 unisize CG 1/175 sq. ft. (5) 33 compact or 100 unisize Enclosed garage. An internal area encompassing two one or more parking spaces measuring ten feet by twenty feet each and shall ~rc, v~c be unobstructed i.e., by walls, appliances, etc. between six inches from finished floor up to six feet from finished floor. 2. For ten or fewer dwelling units at least one garage space and one uncovered parking space per dwelling unit. For eleven or greater dwelling units at least one covered parking space and one uncovered parking space per dwelling units is required. 3. Guest parking for motels/hotels/lodging shall use a standard nine feet by eighteen feet stall dimension. Twenty-five percent of the required parking for employees and ancillary commercial space may use an eight feet by fifteen feet six inches compact space standard. 4. At least fifty percent of the floor area is devoted to manufacturing, assembly and/or warehousing. 5. Refer to standard details table for stall dimensions. 6. Refer to standard details table for requirements for handicapped parking. 7. See 19.100.040H for stall dimensions in parking structures. 8. See 19.100.0400 for description of bicycle parking classes. Table 19.100.40-B Parking Space Dimension Chart Type of Angle In Stall Aisle Aisle Parking Degrees Width Width Width Stall (A) I Way 2 Way Aisle Aisle (a) (a) Standard 0° 9.0 10.0 18.0 30° 9.0 10.0 18.0 35° 9.0 10.0 18.0 40° 9.0 10.0 18.0 45° 9.0 11.5 18.0 .~n° nn I.~B 1Rl'~ Car Module, Module, Space Wall to Wall, Wall to Wall, Depth 2WayAisle I Way Aisle (C) (D) (D) 22.0 N/A N/A 18.0 47.7 39.7 18.0 49.7 41.7 18.0 51.5 43.5 18.0 53.0 46.5 Uni-Size Compact 55° 9.0 14.5 18.0 18.0 55.2 51.7 60° 9.0 16.0 19.0 18.0 56.9 53.9 65° 9.0 17.5 20.0 18.0 58.3 55.8 70° 9,0 19,0 21.0 18.0 59.4 57.4 90° 9.0 N/A 25.0 18.0 61.0 N/A 0° 8.5 10.0 18.0 22.0 N/A ~N/A 30° 8.5 10.0 18.0 18.0 44.5 36.5 35° 8.5 10.0 18,0 18.0 46,2 38.2 40° 8.5 10.0 18.0 18.0 47.7 39.7 45° 8.5 10.0 18.0 18.0 48.9 40,9 50° 8.5 10.0 18.0 18.0 49.9 41.9 55° 8.5 11.5 18.5 18.0 51,2 44,2 60° 8.5 13.0 19.0 18.0 52.2 46.2 65° 8.5 14.5 19.5 18.0 53,0 48.0 70° 8.5 16.0 20.0 18.0 53.5 49.5 90° 8.5 N/A 22.0 18.0 53.0 N/A 0° 8.0 10,0 18.0 19,0 N/A N/A 30° 8.0 10.0 18.0 15.5 43.9 36.5 35° 8,0 10.0 18.0 15.5 43.9 38.2 40° 8.0 10.0 18.0 15.5 45.6 39.7 45° 8.0 10.0 18.5 15.5 47.1 40.9 50° 8.0 11.0 19,0 15.5 48.9 41.9 55° 8.0 12.5 19.5 15.5 50.5 44.2 60° 8.0 14,0 20.0 15.5 51.8 46.2 65° 8.0 15.5 20.5 15.5 52.8 48,0 70° 8.0 17.0 21.0 15.5 53.7 49.5 90° 8.0 N/A 23.0 15,5 54.0 N/A For handicap accessible spaces, please refer to Section 1118A.4 of 1994 Uniform Building Code. For further information, please refer to the Public Works Department Standard Detail Sheets. Table 19.100.040-C CALCULATING SHARED PARKING FOR MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENTS WEEKDAY WEEKEND NIGHTIME Land Use Daytime Evening Daytime Evening (midnight - (9 a.m. - 4 p.m.) (6 p.m. - midnight) (9 a.m. - 4 (6 p.m. - 6 a.m.) p.m.) midnight) Office 100% 10% 10% 5% 5% Offici=!/Industrial Retail 60 90 1 O0 70 5 Hotel 75 1 O0 75 1 O0 75 15-17 Restaurant 100 100 100 100 10 Entertainment/ 40 1 O0 80 1 O0 10 Recreational Instructions: 1. Determine the minimum amount of parking required for each land use as though it were a separate use; 2. Multiply each amount by the corresponding percentage for each of the five time periods; 3. Calculate the column total for each time period; 4. The column total with the highest value is the parking space requirement· 19.100.050 Exceptions. Exceptions to the parking ordinance may be granted as provided in this section. A. Issued by the Design Review Committee. 1. With respect to a request for a tandem garage to provide the minimum required enclosed parking in a residential zoning district, the Design Review Committee may grant an exception to allow the use of a tandem garage for required enclosed parking if the subject development meets all of the following criteria: a. The exception will not adversely affect neighborin~ properties by causing unreasonable numbers of vehicles to park on the neighboring properties or upon public streets. b. The tandem garage improves the overall design of the project. 2. The decision of the Design Review Committee to grant or deny an exception may be appealed subiect to Chapter 19.136 except that the final decision will be made by the Planning Commission. I S-t'7/ B. Issued by the Planning Commission. 1. With respect to all other requests for parking exceptions, the Planning Commission may grant an exception if the subject development meets all of the following criteria: a. There are extraordinary conditions not generally applicable to similar uses which iustify the exception (i.e., unusually high percentage of the lot area is landscaped); b. The exception departs from the requirements of this chapter to the minimum degree necessary to allow the project to proceed; c. The exception will not adversely affect neighboring properties by causing unreasonable numbers of vehicles to park on the neighboring properties or upon public streets. 2. The decision of the Planning Commission to grant or deny an exception may be appealed to the City Council subject to Chapter 19.136. 19.100.060 Interpretation by the Planning Director. The Director of Community Development shall be empowered to make reasonable interpretations of the regulations and provisions of this chapter consistent with the legislative intent thereof. An interpretation by the Director of Community Development may be appealed by any interested party. The appeal will be heard by the Planning Commission. Chapter 14.18 (Heritage and Specimen Tree) Section 14.18.060 C is amended as follows: Privacy protection planting in R-1 zoning districts shall be maintained. Landscape planting maintenance includes irrigation, fertilization and pruning as necessary to yield a growth rate expected for a particular species, xx,. ..... : ............. :^_ ~ ~_.:~ ~ ~:~o: EXHIBIT B Single Family Residential Design Guidelines REVISION Introduction a. Goals and Guiding Principles of Design Guidelines · Create harmonious homes in scale and design. · Allow for continued evolution of the city's housing stock. · Provide a speedy development process for the applicant. · Provide neighbors with input to the development process. bo General Plan Policies All projects must be consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan policies, including: Policy 2-15: Scale of Residential Development Ensure that the scale and density of new residential development and remodeling is reasonably compatible with the City's predominant single-family residential pattern, except in areas designated for higher density housing. Policy 2-18: Privacy in Site Design Ensure that the site design for a residential project has private indoor and outdoor spaces for each unit and common outdoor recreation space. Policy 2-19: Neighborhood Protection Protect residential neighborhoods from noise, traffic, light and visually intrusive effects from more intense developments with adequate buffering setbacks, landscaping, walls, activity limitations, site design and other appropriate measures. Policy 2-20: Minimizing Privacy Intrusion Keep the sights and sounds of the neighbors from intruding on residents. Techniques can include greater building setbacks, wing walls, window shutters and non-transparent glass. Co Objective New homes and remodel and addition projects offer a great opportunity to create a design that is harmonious with and enhances the neighborhood. However, for this to happen one must observe the existing neighborhood characteristics and incorporate them into their design. A special sensitivity must be shown in the design of two story homes, as they have a greater visual impact on the neighborhood. This visual impact may be greater when the two-story home is directly adjacent to single-story homes. To reduce the impact of new homes on the neighborhood, incorporate the scale, form and materials found in the neighborhood into the design. II. Neighborhood Compatibility Objective ' To soften the transition between existing single story neighborhoods and new two-story development. · To improve the integration of new construction into existing neighborhoods. Problem · Architectural design of new two story homes may not account for scale, mass and bulk of existing homes in a neighborhood. · The design of new homes or remodels may not account for the neighborhood s .tyle with regard to materials and building forms. Solutions · Keep soil grade changes between properties to a minimum. · Set the first floor elevation as close to existing grade as possible, including the use of alternate footing designs. This does not include split-level portion of the house. · Balance the appearance of new two-story development with those of existing neighborhood by keeping similar architectural form, roof pitch, wall, eave and ridge heights. · For new two-story homes or two-story additions, use one-story elements at the edges to transition to neighboring single-story homes. · Where new two-story elements or homes are proposed adjacent to single story homes, position new two story windows to protect the privacy of backyard and living areas existing single story homes. This can be achieved by the use of skylights, clerestory windows, reducing the size of windows, raising the sill height of windows or installing louvers on windows. · Second story decks should be placed or designed so as not to offer direct views Lnto adjacent property Ii,Lng ot backyatcl areas. Use solid railings instead of open railb§s and lattice ~nd landscape screening on sides of decks toward sideyards. · New const~ction should incorporate building ~orms, materials and finishes that are common in the neighborhood. · Use roof forms (hip, gable, etc.) that are consistent with the neighborhood pattern. Gable-end roofs _~pica]ly ha~e more visual mass than hipped roofs, but they are encouraged when it is appropriate for neighborhood compatibility. · New construction should incorporate design principles of symmetry_ and balance. III. Mass & Bulk Objective · To reduce the appearance of mass and bulk of new structures. Problem · New two story homes or additions having two story vertical walls appear more massive and bulky, due to lack of regard for building indentation, distance to adjacent buildings or impact to light/air to adjoining properties. · How to maintain the building square footage that the public wants but reducing the visible bulk of a building. Solutions · Keep visible second stories wall heights reduced to a minimum by burying them under the roof of the first story. · Reduce the height of walls and entry features to match the eave heights of homes in a neighborhood. · Use vaulted ceilings rather than high exterior walls to achieve higher volume spaces. · Use simple building and roof forms instead of overly complex forms. Too many hips and valleys, bays, etc. can create a busy appearance. · Continuous second-story walls should have building offsets to mitigate the potentially stark appearance. In cases where building offsets create overly complex roof forms, consideration should be given to the design that results in the best overall design. · Two-story wall planes should be avoided. 15 -/75 Set back second story from first floor and shape to relate to existing house. Avoid a boxy looking second story. Steep pitched roofs should be avoided unless it is consistent with the neighborhood pattern. · Use lighter looking materials on second story such as wood or stucco and avoid using heavy looking building materials such as stone or brick. IV. Streetscapes Objective · To promote good site planning techniques that will improve and beautify a neighborhood. Problem · A neighborhood has a pattern as it related to building setback from street, orientation of garages/driveways, sidewalk pattern and public street tree type. This pattern should be maintained when new homes are built in a neighborhood. · New two-story homes are constructed without installation of front yard landscaping and trees to soften the mass of new two-story elements. Solutions · Usable front porches are encouraged. · Plant a 24" box non-deciduous tree in the front yard, in a location to soften the appearance of two-story elements of the home. · Design the new home to match the existing neighborhood building setbacks and orientation of garages/driveway. · When the garage doors are turned away from the street, use landscape planting, trellises, or the installation of a window(s) facing the street to soften the appearance of what would otherwise be a blank wall · Garage doors should have a minimum of contrasting color to blend in the doors appearance. There should not be excessive wall area above the garage door unless it is associated with a gable end roof. Three-car garages should be avoided. Use tandem parking spaces to have a three-car garage with the visual impact of a two-car garage. The garage elevation should not be more than half of the building frontage. 15..177 '%. :~ Exhibit C R1 PARCELS BY LOT AREA ll O- 5~999 sq. ft. s,0oo - 6~soo sq. ft. ~ 6,500 - 10,000 sq. ft. ~ 10,000 - 150,000 sq. ft. **~,~ Urban Service Area Arterial ~Freeway ~Major Collector ', ' Minor Collector Prepared by the Community Development Department ~ I ~o, ,r 7, 2o02 ~ I Exhibit D Overview of Ordinance Chan es Setbacks · Side setback for lots with average width less than 60' measured at front and rear setback lines shall be 5' and 5' (narrow loO · 10' of second story setback surcharge must be applied to a side-yard adjoining a rear-yard (key lot), except on narrow lots where 5' must be applied. · Comer side-yard setback for garages is 20' (8' more than standard) to allow for sufficien~ driveway space - add to accessory ordinance for detached garages also. Parking · Reduce off-street parking in RI-5 zone to 2, with one enclosed, thus allowing a one-car garage. Area that would have been the second garage-space area cannot be used as building area. · Tandem parking allowed w/o parking exception and PC approval. · Driveways allowed to be pervious · Reduce impervious surface % in front yard, add semi-pervious limit Heights · Maximum height ora single-story wall plane at side-setback line is 10' (up to 12'with - exception to be considered favorably in cases where adjacent house has higher single- story roof eaves) · Maximum height is 26' (28' standard) - exceptions considered if compatible with neighborhood or necessary due to grade/slope · Entry feature plate maximum ridge height is 12' (14' standard) Basements · Give minimal flexibility for patios, constrain to reasonable levels - protect grading, impervious coverage · Basement lightwells - single-story houses can have one 10' x 10' lightwell · Larger lightwells still allowed if basement area counts as floor area. · Specify that high volume in two-story houses apply to the second story area. · Cap on floor area = 6,500 sq. ft. - match RHS · Limit extension of nonconforming building lines, remove neighbor approval CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE September 11, 2002 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review CormTtittee of the City of Cupertino on September 11, 2002. PROIECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application No.: Applicant: Location: MCA-2002-03 (EA-2002-15) City of Cupertino Citywide DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST Amendment to Chapter 19.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code related to single- family residential development in the R1 zoning district. FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and has no significant Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development gl erc/REC EA-2002-15 1 5-.-/8o City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3251 CUPERTINO FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Title: Amendment to the R1 Ordinance EA File No. EA-2002-15 Case File No. MCA-2002-03 Attachments Project Location: City-wide Project Description: Amendment to Chapter 19.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code related to single-family residential development in the R1 zoninq district. Environmental Setting: Standard sin,qle-family subdivisions, predominantly on flat terrain. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Area (ac.) - N/A Building Coverage - N/A% Exist. Building - N/A s.f. Proposed Bldg. - N/A s.f. Zone- R1 G.P. Designation - Residential Low 1-5 DU/Gr. Ac. Assessor's Parcel No. - N/A If Residential, Units/Gross Acre - NIA Total# Rental/Own Bdrms Total s.f. Price Unit Type #1 Unit Type #2 Unit Type #3 Unit Type ~4 Unit Type #5 Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check) [] Monta Vista Design Guidelines S. De Anza Conceptual [] N. De Anza Conceptual [] S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual [] Stevens Crk Blvd. Conceptual [] Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & Landscape If Non-Residential, Building Area - N/A s.f. FAR- 45% Max. Employees/Shift - N/A Parking Required N/A Parking Provided N/A Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area - YES [] NO [] A. CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN SOURCES Do OUTSIDE AGENCIES (Continued) 1. Land Use Element 26. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 2. Public Safety Element 27. County Parks and Recreation Department 3. Housing Element 28. Cupertino Sanitary District 4. Transportation Element 29. Fremont Union High School District 5. Environmental Resources 30. Cupertino Union School District 6. AppendixA- Hillside Development 31. Pacific Gas and Electric 7. Land Use Map 32. Santa Clara County Fire Department 8. Noise Element Amendment 33. County Sheriff 9. City Ridgeline Policy 34. CALTRANS 10. Constraint Maps 35. County Transportation Agency 36. Santa Clara Valley Water District CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS 11. Tree Preservation ordinance 778 12. City Aerial Photography Maps 13. "Cupertino Chronicle" (California History Center, 1976) 14. Geological Report (site specific) 15. Parking Ordinance 1277 16. Zoning Map 17. Zoning Code/Specific Plan Documents 18. City Noise Ordinance CITY AGENCIES Site 19. Community Development Dept. List 20. Public Works Dept. 21. Parks & Recreation Department 22. Cupertino Water Utility OUTSIDE AGENCIES 23. County Planning Department 24. Adjacent Cities' Planning Departments 25. County Depadmental of Environmental Health F° OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS 37. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant Excesses 38. FEMA Flood Maps/SCVVVD Flood Maps 39. USDA, "Soils of Santa Clara County" 40. County Hazardous Waste Management Plan 41. county Heritage Resources Inventory 42. Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel Leak Site 43. CalEPA Hazardous Waste and Substances Site OTHER SOURCES 44. Project Plan Set/Application Materials 45. Field Reconnaissance 46. Experience w/project of similar scope/cha~racteristics 47. ABAG Projection Series A. Complete al_JI information requested on the Initial Study Cover page. LEAVE BLANK SPACES ONLY WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLICABLE. B. Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete, the checklist information in Categories A through O. C. You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s) in the "Source" column next to the question to which they relate. D. If you check any of the "YES" response to any questions, you must attach a sheet explaining the potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed. E. When explaining any yes response, label your answer clearly (Example "N - 3 Historical") Please try to respond concisely, and place as many explanatory responses as possible on each pa,qe. F. Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the Preparer's Affidavit. G. Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City. ,,"Project Plan Set of Legislative Document ¢'Location map with site clearly marked (when applicable) EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? [5,9,24,41,44] b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? [5,9,11,24,34,41,44] c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? [1,17,19,44] d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? [1,16,44] II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? [5,7,39] b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? [5,7,23] c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? [5,7,39] 1~-183 _>,~ c ~ .o' ,-.=_~ ,., [and Supporting Information Sources] ~ ~_ ~ o ~_ III. AIR QUALITY -Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would !the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of [] [] [] [] the applicable air quality plan? [5,37,42,44] b) Violate any air quality standard or [] [] [] [] contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? [5,37,42,44] c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net [] [] [] [] increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? [4,37,44] d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial [] [] [] [] pollutant concentrations? [4,37,44] e) Create objectionable odors affecting a [] [] [] [] substantial number of people? [4,37,44] IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES --Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either [] [] [] [] directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any [] [] [] [] riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] c) Have a substantial adverse effect on [] [] [] [] federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act .... mjLe_dJ..0_.,......m_ ........................................................................................................................................................... ,ssuEs: [and Supporting Information Sources] pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? [20,36,44] d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native res dent or m gratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? [5,10,12,21,26] e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? [11,12,41] f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? [5,10,26,27] V. CULTURAL RESOURCES --Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in {}15064.5? [5,13,41] b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to {}15064.5? [5,13,41] c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? [5,13,41] d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? [1,5] VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent AIquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the 1 5-1 $ SSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. [2,14,44] ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? [2,5,10,44] iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? [2,5,10,39,44] iv) Landslides? [2,5,10,39,44] b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? [2,5,10,44] c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? [2,5,10,39] d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or prope~y? [2,5,10] e) Have soils incapable of adequately supposing the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? [6,9,36,39] VII, H~ARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transpod, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? [32,40,42,43,44] b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? [32,40,42,43,44] c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-qua~er mile ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] of an existing or proposed school? [2,29,30,40,44] d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? [2,42,40,43] e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [2,32,33,44] h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?[1,2,44] VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? [20,36,37] b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? [20,36,42] [and Supporting Information Sources] e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? [20,36,42] f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? [20,36,37] g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? [2,38] h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? [2,38] i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? [2,36,38] j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? [2,36,38] IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING -Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? [7,12,22,41] b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? [1,5,6,9,26] X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to / ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] the region and the residents of the state? [5,10] b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? [5,10] XI. NOISE -- Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? [8,18,44] b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? [8,18,44] c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [8,18] d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [8,18,44] e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [8,18,44] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to i excessive noise levels? [8,18] XlI. POPULATION AND HOUSING --Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? [3,16,47,44] iSSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] Xlll. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? [19,32,44] Police protection? [33,44] Schools? [29,30,44] Parks? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] Other public facilities? [19,20,44] XIV. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? [5,44] XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is s___u_bstantial in relation to the existing traffic ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] i ! load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? [4,20,35,44] b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? [4,20,44] c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? [4,?] d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [20,35,44] e) Result in inadequate emergency access? [2,19,32,33,44] f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? [17,44] g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [4,34] XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? [5,22,28,36,44] b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [36,22,28,36] c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [5,22,28,36,44] ,ssuEs: [and Supporting Information Sources] e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which se~es or may se~e the project that it has adequate capacity to se~e the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? [5,22,28,36,44] ~ Be se~ed by a landfill with sufficient permi~ed capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? [?] g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? [?] a) Does the project have the potential to [] [] [] [] degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? [] b) Does the project have impacts that are [] [] [] [] individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? [] c) Does the project have environmental [] [] [] [] effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? [] I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appropriate source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. I hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the con.se, quences of such delay or discontinuance. /~(._~ /~, Preparer's Signature _ v Print Preparer's Name Peter Gilli, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [] Aesthetics [] Agriculture Resources [] Air Quality [] Biological Resources [] Cultural Resources [] Geology/Soils [] Hazards & Hazardous [] Hydrology / Water [] Land Use / Planning Materials Quality [] Mineral Resources [] Noise [] Population / Housing [] Public Services [] Recreation [] Transportation/Traffic [] Utilities / Service [] Mandatory Findings of Systems Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds that: [] The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [] The proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [] Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the ,.-,.p[ropose.~d proAej~t, nothing further is required. Staff Evaluator ERC Chairperson Date Peter Gilli From: sent: To: Subject: 0RI12 [kiwi@orimp.com] Saturday, February 22, 2003 1:53 PM peterg@cupertino.org; dsandoval@cupertino.org; rlowenthal@cupertino.org; pkwok@cupertino.org; sjames@cupertino.org; mchang@cupertino.org; taghi.saadati@ci.sj.ca.us; gwong212@aol.com; angela.chen@ci.sj.ca.us; charles_corr@sjusd.k 12.ca.us Proposed amendment to modifications of the R1 ordinance To: City Council, City of Cupertino Planning Commission, City of Cupertino Peter Gilli, Cupertino Planning Department From: (Mr.) Jan Stoeckenius, Julia Tien 22386 Cupertino Road Subj: MCA-2002-03, EA-2002-15 - proposed modification We would like to present the attached modification to MCA-2002-03/ EA-2002-15 for consideration by the City Council (along with the application) at the March 3, 2003 meeting. During the initial Planning Commission meetings on this application, we expressed concern that the 35% second floor/first floor ratio that is part of the RI ordinance (Section 19.28.060 (B) (2)) greatly limited design flexibility. We felt that the drawings presented by Mr. Gilli of houses built under the 1999 ordinances were very similar in appearance (scaled for size). We urged relaxing of this regulation to allow some diversity in design, consistent with the photos of older homes shown by Commissioner Auerbach. We feel this is particularly important for larger lots. We did not, however, have a specific proposal at the time. In the meetings, many commissioners expressed support for providing more flexibility in this area, and stressed that good design should be encouraged. However, in the staff report for the final meeting on this application, the Planning Department stated that this requirement was so central to the 1999 changes to the RI ordinance that Council approval would be necessary before investigating any relaxation of the regulation. We urged that a minute order be prepared requesting this permission, but the Commission did not pursue this action. We are therefore presenting this proposed modification of MCA-2002-03 directly to the City Council. We believe it does not significantly alter the intent of the 35% second/first floor ratio, and indeed, offers some incentive to reduce the overall size of new and remodeled houses on large lots. Our proposal is to modify Section 19.28.060 (B) (2) to read: The maximum floor area of a second story shall be thirty-five percent of the existing or proposed first story floor area, or six hundred square feet, whichever is greater, except for RI-10 and R1-20 zones. In Rl-10 and R1-20 zones, the maximum floor area of a second story shall be twelve percent (12%) of the lot area or seventy percent (70%) of the existing or proposed first story floor area, whichever is less. £he effect of this modification for lots zoned Ri-10 and R1-20 1. Increases slightly the maximum second story floor area. 1 For a house built to the maximum FAR (45% of lot area), the current regulation allows a second floor area of up to 11.667% of lot area (see Appendix I for the derivation). In our proposal, we round 11.667% to 12% for simplicity. On a 10,000 sq. ft. lot, this change allows a second floor area that is 33 sq. ft. larger than the existing regulation (1200 sq. ft. vs. 1167 sq. ft.), about the size of a closet. A discussion of the reason leading to the additional 70% second story/first story floor area ratio requirement is provided in Appendix II. 2. Reduces the total house size required to maximize the size of a second floor. For example, on a 10,000 sq. ft. lot, under the existing regulation: maximum second story floor area: required first story floor area: total house floor area: 1167 sq. ft. 3333 sq. ft. 4500 sq. ft. (FAR = .45) With the proposed modification: maximum second story floor area: required first story floor area: total house floor area: 1200 sq. ft. 1715 sq. ft. 3915 sq. ft. (FAR = .39) The proposed regulation allows a slightly larger second floor, but reduces the minimum total house size by 13%. 3. Removes the blanket 600 sq. ft. second story floor area allowance. This has no practical effect as the allowance would only apply to houses of less than 1460 sq. ft., and economic considerations preclude building such small houses in the Rl-10/20 zones. Our reasons for making this proposal: A. We feel that the existing 35% second floor to first floor ratio requirement causes some houses in the Rl-10/20 zones to be built larger than they otherwise would be. In Cupertino, newly built or remodeled houses in the Rl-10/20 zones are almost invariably priced over $1.2 million. Many buyers in this price range wish to have a master bedroom suite and two other bedrooms upstairs, along with at least two full bathrooms, when hallways, closets, walls, and utility access areas are added, this pushes the second story floor area above 1000 sq. ft. Such second stories can be built under the current regulation, but only if the total house size is increased to nearly the limit set by the FAR. We believe that for some developments on large lots, house size is increased specifically to accommodate the desired second floor size. Lots in the RI-10 and R1-20 zones vary considerably in size. While most RI-10 lots are about 10,000 sq. ft., lots over 13,500 sq. ft. must be considered. New construction on 10,000 sq. ft. lots will likely come close to the size allowed by the 45% FAR in any case. Our proposal has essentially no effect on houses in this category. For 10ts over 13,500 sq. ft., however, development is less likely to 2 approach to the limit set by the PAR (house size over 6000 sq. ft.), if it were not for the current 35% second floor to first floor rule. We believe it to be bad policy to set regulatlons that encourage houses to be larger than they otherwise would be. Outside of the Rl-10/20 zones, this is less of an issue as lot sizes are more uniform, and economic considerations cause new and remodeled houses to be built close to the maximum size allowed. There have been two recent developments in our neighborhood that we believe illustrate the effect of the current regulation. (Numbers cited are approximate.) Case 1: New house at the corner of Carmen and Cupertino Road (construction not yet begun): lot: 90' x 140' (12,600 sq. ft.) house: 5650 sq. ft. basement: 1500 sq. ft. The first floor of this house extends nearly 100' along Cupertino Road. This side includes the front door and garage entrance but is legally a lot side-line, so is permitted to have less than the normal front yard setback. At the Design Review Committee meeting, we proposed some alternatives to reduce the imposing view from Cupertino Road, but there was a problem: A~y change that reduced the size of the first floor also reduced the allowed size of the second floor, which was unacceptable to the owner. We do not know if any of the proposed changes would have been acceptable to the owner independent of the second floor size consideration, but we believe they may have been. The owner's architect cited the second floor to first floor area ratio requirement as severely limiting the possible designs. Case 2: New house under construction on Hillcrest: lot: 88' x 120' (10560 sq. ft.) house: ?? basement: 1800 sq. ft. The builder/owner of this house told us that he chose to build a single-story house specifically to avoid the regulatory complications involved with a second story. To achieve the desired overall size, the house is built to both side-yard setback lines, (5' on one side, 10' on the other) and includes a large basement. The first floor is raised to accommodate the basement, which puts the plate height at the 12' maximum permitted by the R1 ordinance. Because the grade around the house has been raised for drainage, we estimate that the plate is nearly 15' above the grade of the adjoining lot on the 5' setback side. The neighbor to this side may well have been happier had the new house been built with a second floor conforming to the existing privacy mitigation regulations and design guidelines, and a somewhat smaller first floor that allowed larger setbacks and likely a lower plate height, B. In the Rl-10/20 zones that are the focus of our proposal, the impact of a second floor on neigh_bors is usually less than is the case for smaller lots. There are usually more opportunities to 3 mitigate such impact through the use of landscaping, and often existing trees can be retained if the footprint of the house is minimized. Existing plantings serve to provide immediate screening for neighboring properties. The overall larger house sizes also allow more freedom in the placement of windows for privacy mitigation. C. There is less need to use the single story elements of a house to mask its visual bulk in the Rl-10/20 zones than is the case for smaller lots. If the footprint of a house is kept small, the yard space provided by lots over 10,000 sq. ft. allows room for large trees, which in many cases (certainly ours) can hide significant portions of a house when seen from the street or from neighboring properties. However, large trees (i.e., over 30 feet tall) cannot survive in a 10 foot side yard setback area, which may be all that is left if a house is pushed to the maximum FAR allowed. (We are not convinced by that masking of a second floor element via a larger first floor element reduces visual bulk, even on smaller lots.) D. An alternate part of MCA-2002-03 (a modification to Section 19.28.060(D)) requires all new two story construction (including additions) to receive discretionary design approval from the Director of Community Development. We believe this discretionary approval will be sufficient to identify and mitigate any problems that might arise due to the smaller first stories allowed by the proposed change. Appendix I. - Derivation of 11.67% second floor FAR Under the current rules, first floor area + second floor area <= .45 x lot area (1) secon~ floo~ area <= .35 ~ first floor area - (2) Inverting (2) yields first floor area >= second floor area / .35 which implies first floor area + second floor area - ->= (1 + 1/ .3~) x s~cond floor area or ((.35 + 1) / .35) x second floor area <= first floor_area + -- -- secon~ floor area Combined with (1) this yields (1.35 / .35) x second_floor_area <= .45 x lot_area or multiplying both sides by ( .35 / 1.35) second floor area <= .11666... * lot area Appendix II. - Derivation of 70% second story/first story floor area ratio The proposed maximum of 70% for the second story/first story floor area ratio is based on the maximum ratio that might actually be achieved under the current regulation. 4 We estimate that the smallest house that could economically be built or remodeled in Cupertino has a floor area of about 1500 sq. ft. (on a 5000 sq. ft. lot). Under the current regulation, such a house could be built with a 600 sq. ft. second story element. The second story/first story floor area ratio for such a house would be: 600 / (1500 - 600) = 2 / 3 = .6666... which we rounded up to 70%. For a 10,000 sq. ft. lot, our proposal would allow buildin9 of a home of almost exactly double the size allowed by the current regulations for a 5000 sq. ft. lot. EXIBITS BEGIN HERE MCA-2002-03 · Single Family Residential Design Guidelines · R1 Ordinance - Accessory Structure Ordinance - Parking Ordinance - Heritage and Specimen Tree Ordinance What Caused the 1999 R1 Amendment? · Community pressure to do something about large, out of scale development in established neighborhoods and privacy intrusion. How did the 1999 R1 Amend. come about? · Result of hours of meetings, study sessions and public hearings from 1997 to 1999: - Community Members - Builders & Architects - Planning Commissioners - City Councilmembers - Staff Adoption of the 1999 R1 Amendment · The City Council adopted the 1999 R1 Amendment to achieve the following principles: - Improve neighborhood compatibility; - Improve protection of privacy; - Allow for continued building of new homes and additions; - Provide neighbors with input into the process. Basis for Design Guidelines · Ensure that the scale of new development and remodeling is reasonably compatible with the neighborhood. (paraphrased Policy 2-15) · Protect neighborhoods from effects of more intense developments. (paraphrased Policy 2- 18) · Harmonious design · Incorporate existing neighborhood characteristics into new projects Guidelines & Compatibility · Design Guidelines encourage compatibility through: - Site design - Building forms · Roof style · Wall, eave and roof heights - Building materials/fagade Known Effects of 1999 R1 Amendment · All parties were aware that the 1999 R1 Amendment would: Cause smaller second-stories, limiting the number of bedrooms on second-stories Encourage the construction of single- story development that would cover more of the lot Impose discretionary guidelines on builders of two-story homes One Year Review One Year Review (2000) · Ordinance alone does not sufficiently address impacts - Design Guidelines and Design Review necessary bit A b~t Exhibit C' Exhibit A Exhibit Bottom Line · Trade-off Applicant wants 45 % City wants impacts FAR minimized visual and privacy By reducing the mass & bulk of the house, the City's objective is met, the project is approved and the applicant's objective is met. Results of One Year Review · July 24, 2000 - Planning Commission Minute Order - Lower heights by 2 feet (building envelope, entrY) - Apply building envelope to single-story sections of two-Story homes - Require staff level approval for two-story projects under 35% FAR Results of One Year Review · Staff recommended against lowering the heights by 2 feet in 2000: - Guidelines would require compatibility, thus effectively reducing heights for two-story projects - Revisit height issue when there is public concern related to tall single-story heights Since then... Impacting an Established Neighborhood Impacting a Neighbor Design Review Applications · Problems: - Ordinance / Guideline conflicts: · Wall & entry heights are maximized · Complicated roof designs · Poor transitions - Hearings for homes with 45 % FAR receive very little public interest -Complaints from the public concerning heights -Comments from CC & PC members Amendments · Public concern over single-story heights - Follow up on the former PC recommendation · Incorporate minor changes that are consistent with the parameters of the 1999 R1 Ordinance Amendment Reduce mass and bulk of new development Mitigate impacts of new development on neighbors R1 Ordinance: Staff Recommended Changes · Narrow Lots - First Story Side Setback · Second Story Surcharge on Key Lots · Heights · Basements · High-Volume Area · Maximum Floor Area · Extension of Building Lines · Second Story Decks · Privacy Protection · Garages - Corner lot setback - Rancho Rinconada (R1-5) parking reduction - Tandem parking exception at DRC R1 Ordinance: Planning Commission Recommended Changes · Narrow Lots - First Story Side Setback · Second Story Surcharge on Key Lots · Basements · High-Volume Area · Extension of Building Lines · Second Story Decks · Privacy Protection · Garages - Corner lot setback - Tandem parking exception at DRC ·Process Amendments · Prescriptive regulations changes are minor · Process change based on direction from the Planning Commission Process Amendment BEFORE No review Public hearing (DRC) approval from Director (no noticing) AFTER Design Approval Singl Limited Public hearing review story poles, noticing (DRC) Public Input · Neighbor issues with new construction - Mass and bulk - Privacy intrusion - Notification of the project - Participation in process - Prefer prescriphve regulations to guidelines (objective vs. subjective) - Sacrificing tall exterior walls for additional floor area (over 35 % FAR) - Prefer larger second-stories - Concern of increasing staff discretion · Applicant issues with regulations Recommendation · The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: - Approve a negative declaration, EA-2002-15. Approve the Model Ordinance; Approve modifications to the Single-Family Residential Design Guidelines; - If approved tonight, the effective date will be 4/17/03 EXIBITS END HERE CITY OF CUPE INO City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX (48g) 777-3535 AGENDA ITEM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Summary AGENDA DATE March 3~ 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Report on Labor Compliance Provisions for Construction Contracts and Approval of Revised Special Provisions for Certified Payrolls and Prevailing Wage Requirements for the Civic Center and Library Phase II Construction Project. BACKGROUND On October 7, 2002 the Council heard an oral presentation from Neil Struthers, representing the Santa Clara Building and Trades Council (SCBTC) who suggested that the Council consider adopting several labor compliance programs for the City's construction projects. These included a formal Labor Compliance Program as currently provided in State Law, a Pre-Qualification process for construction contractors in accordance with the provisions of the state Public Contracts Code, and the incorporation of several requirements for contractors to provide certified payrolls for construction work with penalties for non-compliance. On November 4, 2002, the Council received a report from City Attorney Charles Kilian that, among other things, provided information regarding the items suggested by Mr. Struthers as noted above. Following discussion and advice from staff as to the potential for delay to the Library project if some of these suggestions were to be considered, Council generally agreed that Council members Sandovol and Kwok would meet informally with staff and come back to the entire Council with recommendations or suggestions. That meeting was held in December 2002 and these issues were discussed in detail. Council members Kwok and Sandoval concurred with staff that to proceed with either a Contract Compliance Program or Pre-qualification of Contractors would seriously jeopardize the Library project budget and schedule, but that a proposed specification regarding prevailing wages and submission of certified payrolls, while increasing costs, would be appropriate for the Library/Civic Center building contract (Phase I1). The meeting concluded with a request by Council member Sandoval for some background information on project labor agreements. Printed on Recyc/ed Paper I ~' ""~[ A subsequent meeting with Council member Sandoval was held on February 4, 2002. In addition to summarizing and confirming our earlier discussion, the concept of project labor agreements (PLAs) was discussed. At Council member Sandoval's request, information on PLA's is provided as attachment 'C' for the Council's information. While researching this subject, it became clear to staff that any application of a project labor agreement to the Library Civic Center project could have significant implications and/or consequences. Therefore Attachment 'C' also includes appropriate and relevant references to these implications to ensure that the Council has a full and complete understanding of the significance of any consideration of a PLA on a City project. This Council report from staff, the PLA reference notwithstanding, summarizes the discussion of the three SCBTC suggestions noted above that the Council had referred to staff along with staff's conclusions and recommendations regarding any implementation of these proposals for city construction contracts. Certified Pawoll Requirements and Labor Compliance Program The City currently imposes and enforces the requirement for contractors to retain and, if required, to submit to the city certified payrolls of all persons employed on the City's public works contracts. Staff has routinely incorporated by reference in all contracts the requirements contained in the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Standard Specifications, which relate to the requirements for payment of prevailing wages and certified payrolls. Therefore, in order to emphasize and strengthen those requirements, staff has drafted language based on the Caltrans Standards and the provisions of the State Labor Code relating to Labor Compliance as suggested by Mr. Struthers, which will be specifically included in the specifications and highlighted in the bid documents. In addition these requirements will be discussed at a mandatory pre-bid conference with all prospective bidders. In summary, this new specification language would now require that the contractor and subcontractors on the project submit certified payrolls for each pay period to the City. (The current requirement is that they need only be submitted when requested by the City). It further specifies that if the contractor fails to submit the certified payrolls, the City may retain 10% of the value of the work represented by those payrolls up to a maximum of $10,000 for each month of non-compliance. The City, through its construction manager, Nova Partners will review and archive the submitted payrolls. The specific requirements and the penalties for non-compliance are described in attachment 'A'. As noted above, these provisions were discussed with Council members Sandovol and Kwok who agreed with staff that it would be appropriate to recommend to the Council that these specific provisions be included in the Library/Civic Center building contract. Since all of these requirements would provide for ensuring that the contractors comply with prevailing wage requirements and provisions for certified payrolls along with penalties for non-compliance, any application of a formal "Contract Compliance Program" as suggested by SCBTC under the provisions of the State Labor Code would be redundant and unnecessary. As is now the case, any complaint flied with the City, or anyone else, would be investigated by the State Labor Commissioner from the documents required by the City's contract. Finally, to adopt such a contract compliance program would require additional time and state approval, which would very likely delay the bidding of the project for an unknown but potentially extensive period of time. Pre-qualification Process Pre-qualification Definition. As noted in Mr. Kilian's earlier report, pre-qualification programs have historically been used sparingly to insure that bidders on complex or unusual public works projects possess the requisite expertise, skill and experience to perform specific types of construction. Since 1999 the Public Contract Code has allowed public entities to similarly pre-qualify bidders. However, the current statute requires a pre-qualification procedure, for which the State Department of Industrial Relations has developed guidelines, to be used to establish the pre-qualification process. Like the contract compliance option noted above, an approved pre-qualification program involves a comprehensive approach including the development and adoption of a uniform system of rating bidders based on a series of objective criteria and the development of a detailed appeals process. The outcome of such a program would be to provide a list of pre-qualified contractors who may bid on projects or a specific project for a one-year period from the date the list is established. An evaluation of the steps and timetable necessary to establish a pre- qualification program are described in Attachment 'B'. The key outcome of such a process as shown on the attachment is that it would impact the Library/Civic project by a delay of at least five months. The most important conclusion in evaluating this process, however, is that not matter how long it takes, this pre-qualification process serves no useful purpose for the Library/Civic Center. The project is not a complex one. As such, it would not require any particular expertise that would not be available from most licensed building contractors who would have the capacity to take on such a project. Further, this process would not provide the city with any more assurance that a contractor is responsible than is now provided in the existing statutes and the bid documents. As noted in Attachment 'B', after completing the pre-qualification process for the project, it is likely that the facility would not open until April of 2005 (or even later if there are appeals to the process), rather than October of 2004. There are several consequences to that delay: 1. The temporary library facility lease (with extension) expires in November 2004. 2. The cost increases from escalation, lease extension, and the pre-qualification process could exceed $500,000 for which there is no funding. The demolition and grading will be completed in May 2003 and the building construction would not begin until November of 2003 leaving the site vacant with no work underway for up to six months (or longer if appealed). In delaying the bidding of the project from April to September runs the risk of eroding, to the City's detriment, the highly competitive bidding environment and construction market which is expected in the spring of 2003. o Because public expectations are high for the October 2004 opening, the public relations consequences of this action, i.e., the perception that the City has imposed a restraint on itself that has unnecessarily delayed the project could very be significant. For all these reasons, staff cannot support any further consideration of a pre-qualfication process for the Civic Center/Library Phase II Project. FISCAL IMPACT There would be a cost to acquire, review and archive certified payrolls for the Civic Center Library project and administer the process described in Exhibit 'A', which without additional staff, would need to be done through the contract services of the Construction Management Consultant and could approach $50,000 over the 16 month period of the Phase II contract. A source of funding for that effort, if approved by the Council, may need to be proposed as part of the FY 2003-2004 Capital Improvement Program. There may also be a cost to the contractors to comply with these provisions, which will be reflected in their bid price as part of their project overhead. This additional cost impact to the bid and how it would be absorbed by the contractor in the bid price is unknown but will likely be a factor in the bid responses. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Council accept this report, with no further consideration of a State approved Labor Compliance Program or Pre-qualification Process, and approve the concept for prevailing wages and certified payrolls for the Library/Civic Center building contract as described in Attachment 'A'. Submitted by: Director of Public Works Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager ATTACHMENT 'A' Cupertino Public Library and Civic Center project Contract Provisions for Payment of Prevailing Wages and Requirements for the Completion of Certified Payrolls The City of Cupertino Library Contract and Bid Specifications refer to the State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications dated July 1992. Specifically Sections 7-1.0lA and 7-1.01B both directly and by reference to the California Labor Code require the following with respect to prevailing wages and payroll records: Prevailing Wages. The Library Contract as with all city construction contracts requires that Contractors pay prevailing wages to workers employed on a City Public Works Contract. Prevailing wages are those wage rates determined by the State Director of Industrial Relations for the work or craft in which the worker is employed for any public work done under the contract. Among other things it requires that the prevailing wage rates be posted conspicuously at the jobsite. Payroll Records. Each contractor and subcontractor is required to keep an accurate payroll record showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employee employed by him or her in connection with the public work. It further requires that the payrolls be certified by the contractor as true and correct under penalty of perjury and that they made available for inspection and that the contractor and subcontractor shall notify the City of the location of the records. Submittal of Payrolls to the City. A copy of all certified payrolls including a "Statement of Compliance" must be submitted weekly by the contractor to the City in accordance with the same requirements noted above. The Contractor shall also be responsible for submittal of all payrolls of subcontractors. Retention for Failure to Comply with Payroll Submittal. If by the 15th of the month the Contractor has not submitted all certified payrolls for all work performed during the preceding month the City may retain an amount of 10% of the value of the work performed in the preceding month over and above any other retentions provided by the contract up to a maximum of $10,000 for each month of non-compliance. ATTACHMENT 'B' Analysis and Proiected Timetable for Pre-qualification Program. This analysis assumes that the City's intention is to pre-qualify only for the Civic Center/Library building project, which would then assume that projects that are bidding in February - March 2003 (City Center Park, Sports Center) will proceed on schedule without pre-qualification. The following schedule also assumes that Council direction to proceed would occur in February 2003, and presumes no challenge, appeal or litigation as a result of the pre- qualification findings and determinations. If challenged or appealed, the delay is unknown, but could be substantial. Task Library Estimated Current Completion (mo/w) Schedule 1. Council ApProval to proceed: February 2003 N/A 2. Hire Consultant, Develop Ordinance and Related Documents (Questionnaires, etc.) And Appeal process. April 2003 N/A 3. Hearings, Council Approval of ordinance and Program, Ordinance Enacted (Note: If Urgency Findings made, could be complete in May 2003) June 2003 N/A RFP, Advertisement for Contractors, review questionnaires, do reference interviews and follow-up documentation, Council approval. August 2003 5. Bid (Advertise) project September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 April 2005 6. Award Contract 7. Begin Construction 8. Complete Project -Phase II (16 mos) N/A April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 October 2004 ATTACHMENT 'C' PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENTS This information is based on discussions with the City of San Jose, which has an approved Project Labor Agreement (PLA) for projects at the Mineta San Jose International Airport, and the San Jose Unified School District (SJUSD) which does not have a PLA but has conducted a workshop with its Board on the subject, and the East Side Union High School District (ESUHSD) which reports that they are in the process of negotiating PLA. In addition, in an effort to better understand the use of PLAs staff spoke with the staffs of several Northern California Public Works Departments. Of these, San Jose is the only one that staff could find that has such an instrument in place. Most cities were not familiar with the term or the actual understanding of the process. Those who recognized the term indicated that it was primarily from reading about the Supreme Court decision upholding the San Francisco Airport (SFO) PLA in 1999. Finally, San Jose indicated that a PLA was in place for the San Jose City Hall project but staff was unable to obtain a copy. The following discussion of the components of PLAs is based primarily on discussions with and documents from San Jose and discussions with SJUSD and ESUHSD. This report also attempts to compare and contrast the Civic Center/Library project into the context of the provisions of the existing San Jose PLA conditions, and the circumstances of the two school districts. GENERAL A Project Labor Agreement (PLA), at least the one in San Jose, is an agreement between the construction trade unions and a project owner (i.e., the City) to provide for the peaceful settlement of labor disputes and grievances without strikes and lockouts. The unions agree not to strike or engage in other disruptive activities, and the owner agrees to require contractors and their subcontractors to be bound by the terms of the agreement. PLA's usually include provisions to resolve labor disputes and employee grievances, and can include rules to establish a single set of wages, hours, and working conditions for all craft workers on the project. All contractors, whether normally "union" (i.e., have some kind of collective bargaining agreement in place with the trade unions) or "non-union," are eligible to bid for the work, as long as they are willing to work under the under the provisions of the project labor agreement for that particular construction work. These provisions, in essence, require contractors, whether union or non-union, to acquire labor forces through the union referral process. LEGALITY OF PLA'S The legality of using project labor agreements in California on public works projects has, until recently, been unclear. However, in August of 1999, the California Supreme Court issued its Opinion upholding the San Francisco Airport (SFO) Project Labor Agreement, from which others, including the San Jose agreement followed. However, with respect to federally funded projects, in January of 2001, a Presidential Order was issued prohibiting mandatory PLA's on federally funded public works projects, and was challenged in court by the building trades to block its enforcement. The challenge was upheld in the lower court but was ultimately reversed by the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, affirming the executive order, which continues in force. Most recently, the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of the lower court ruling banning project labor agreements on federal jobs. As a result PLA's are not allowed on public works projects that receive federal funds. A copy of the article on this ruling, which appeared in Engineering News Record, is attached. USE AND APPLICABILITY OF PLA'S Case-by-Case Evaluation of Applicability and Value of PLA's From discussions with other agencies, it seems clear that project labor agreements cannot be used on a blanket basis for all public works projects. The determination to use a project labor agreement must be made on a case by case basis with the owner reviewing, in effect, whether such an agreement will "add value" to its construction program. Many things are considered such as the importance of completing the project on time and therefore the need to avoid labor disruption or disputes between the contractor and its employees, along with the need for a reliable supply of skilled labor. However, these conditions are present in most projects and have not typically been considered an unusual need that would require a PLA. Unique and Special Conditions that may Benefit from PLA's Other conditions could include the need for special working conditions because of the nature of the work requirements including restricted hours of work, congested site conditions, or some special complexity of the project requiring an unusual mix of skills to construct the facility or multiple prime contractors occupying the site over an extended period of time. Also, as in such projects like an airport, any interruption in the work could seriously impact a revenue stream realized by the facility if the construction is delayed. For example, if ten new passenger gates were under construction, all of which would generate considerable revenue once in operation, any work stoppage, for whatever reason, could be costly in terms of lost revenue. The assurance of a "no strike" or work stoppage agreement is a positive condition on any project. However, for all the reasons noted above, those provisions would be more applicable to very large, complex, multiple contract, and multi year projects where delays would be costly, such as the San Jose airport or the SFO projects. Whether PLA's are beneficial to such projects or not, it is clear that, according to that criteria, PLA's would not be applicable to the Cupertino Civic Center/Library project. PARTIES TO THE AGREEMENT The initial parties to a Project Labor Agreement would be the City and the various unions, which represent the construction trades required for the project or projects. All the traditional and project necessary construction unions must each individually agree to sign and be bound by the terms of the agreement. After the initial agreement is executed between the City and the various trade unions, the provisions of the Project Labor Agreement are added to the bid package for the projects specified. Upon award of the project to the lowest responsible bidder, the bidder (general contractor) is required to sign and abide by the Project Labor Agreement provisions just as they are required to follow the other terms and conditions of the public works contract. The subcontractors are also required to be bound by the provisions of the Project Labor Agreement. NEGOTIATIONS - SCHEDULE IMPACTS The experience in negotiating a PLA by San Jose has shown that to acquire and obtain agreement on a PLA for a specific project is a lengthy and difficult process. San Jose staffhas reported that the negotiations took several years and required the expertise of costly outside legal counsel. While an agreement for the city's project would probably take less time that that, it is with that understanding that the use and applicability of a PLA must be carefully considered. In this context, of particular importance in that consideration is that the Civic Center/Library is on the Council approved schedule for bidding of the Phase II (Buildings and Plaza) project, which is scheduled to go out to bid on April 7, 2003. Based on the experience of others, staff does not believe that a PLA could be successfully negotiated and executed for inclusion into the bid documents without a significant delay in the project. The same delay impacts noted in attachment 'B' would be applicable to a delay in bidding the project on the current schedule. Further impacting the time frame for concluding an agreement, it is also likely that, as with San Jose and the ESUHSD, the services of an outside counsel and/or consultant will be required to produce a satisfactory agreement that would serve the City's interest, even assuming such agreement is possible. It has also been noted, that with respect to the school districts, the compulsion to become involved with Labor Compliance programs, including PLAs, appears to be the result of very recent state legislation (AB 1506) which requires school districts that use construction funding from the 2002 school bond measures to "initiate and enforce" a Labor Compliance Program for all work that commences after April 1, 2003. No such requirement exists or is proposed for city public works projects. In fact the draft ESUHSD agreement specifically excludes all projects not funded by the bond measure. Finally, as no(ed above, and the timing element notwithstanding, the use of a PLA must be determined on a case-by-case basis and is limited to only the specific project or projects described in its scope. While Project Labor Agreements may be applicable to large and complex projects such as the SJ Airport ($900 Million), the ESUHSD bond program ($300 Million), the SJUSD Bone program ($500 Million) and the SJ City Hall ($350 Million) that are particularly time and revenue sensitive and may require extensive coordination between project elements, they are not advantageous for all projects. Smaller and less complex projects that are not unusually time sensitive or revenue or service sensitive, which the Civic Center/Library project is not, would not be good candidates for a project labor agreement. Staff could find no public works projects of similar scope and complexity that have ever used or considered a PLA as necessary or advantageous. WORK STOPPAGES, WAGES AND BENEFITS In the San Jose agreement, there are provisions to the effect that strikes and lockouts are strictly prohibited. Neither the union nor the employees are allowed to engage in any disruptive activity either at the job site or at any other facility of the city because of a dispute on the project. Disputes arising between the unions and contractors on the project are to be resolved pursuant to the dispute resolution procedures specified in the project labor agreement, which includes binding arbitration. The agreement also requires that wages and benefits be paid in accordance with the applicable prevailing wage rate determinations. This provision, in compliance with state and local law is currently in all city project specifications and no PLA is necessary to require it or to enforce it. LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE PLAs typically would provide for the establishment of a labor management committee with representatives from the trades, the contractor and the City. The Committee is to meet periodically to review progress on the project, to discuss matters of general concern such as safety and security, to foster communication between labor and management, and to complete the project in an economic and efficient manner without interruption, delays or work stoppages. This committee is not directly involved in the grievance procedures discussed earlier; their charge is of a more general application to encourage the maintenance of harmonious labor relations on the project. This feature would be a desirable tool on any project to maintain harmonious working conditions. However a PLA is not necessary or required to establish such a committee. EXIBITS BEGIN HERE CC -d:lb March 3, 2003 Councilmember Sandoval Proposed Policy on Responsible Contracting In order to protect the citizens of the City and assure that the City does business solely with truly responsible contractors who abide by all applicable laws and regulations. California law, as well as good business practices, mandates that public works projects be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. Typically, "responsible" is defined as contractors who are 1. Licensed properly; 2. Adequately bonded (insured); 3. Not barred from work based on past violations; 4. maintain a training/ apprenticeship program. In addition to these definitions, it is the policy of the City of Cupertino to further define Responsible bidders as those which: 1. Have no pending, outstanding or un-abated violations of prevailing wage statutes in any jurisdiction; 2. Have no pending, outstanding or un-abated violations of workplace safety violations; 3. Have no pending, outstanding or un-abated violations of environmental laws or regulations; 4. Have a generally sound reputation among other local public agencies for whom they have completed contracts on schedule, on budget, and without unreasonable litigation. California law mandates that prevailing wages be paid on public works projects. This policy assures a level playing field for all prospective bidders and provides the taxpayers an assurance that public works projects are done with competent contractors employing properly trained workers. It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to 1. Require affirmative acknowledgement of this policy by prospective bidders; 2. Require complete compliance with the relevant prevailing wage statutes; and 3. To provide a self-funding mechanism for the local enforcement of these laws. EXIBITS END HERE CITY OF CUPE INO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX (408) 777-3333 AGENDA ITEM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Summary AGENDA DATE March 3, 2003 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. I t~ I~/ "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 11.24.170 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to Parking Limitation on Certain Streets, Establishing a 30-Minute Limited Parking Zone on Bonny Drive, Scofield Drive, and Pepper Tree Lane, in the vicinity of Faria School." BACKGROUND On June 3, 2002, the Cupertino City Council approved a pilot program implementing a 30- minute "drop-off" zone on the streets adjacent to the school, and directed that staff report back on this program in February 2003. The streets listed above have been part of this pilot program. Barbara Lane, adjacent to Faria Elementary School, was not part of this pilot program, in order to reduce traffic congestion directly around the school. The pilot program was to encourage parents to park on nearby streets, thereby reducing traffic congestion. Current Evaluation of Pilot Program As reported by Dolly Travers, principal of Faria Elementary School, before the 30-minute parking began, the number of cars driving into the parking lot was an average of 256.5 during the morning and 201 during the afternoon. After initiation of the 30~minute parking project, the number of cars driving into the parking lot in the morning has been 221.5, a reduction of 13.6%. In the afternoon, there has been an average of only 136.3 cars, a reduction of 32.2% fewer cars. This program is viewed as a success in reducing traffic congestion within the neighborhood. There are no future plans to expand this program. The current streets listed provide a reasonable distance to expect parents to park and walk their children. FISCAL IMPACT There is no financial impact. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the City Council conduct the reading and enactment of Ordinance No. I~I~: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Section 11.24.170 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to Parking Limitation on Certain Streets, Establishing A 30- Minute Limited Parking Zone on Bonny Drive, Scofield Drive, and Pepper Tree Lane, in the vicinity of Faria School." Submitted by: Director of Public Works Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 1914 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AMENDING SECTION 11.24.170 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING LIMITATION ON CERTAIN STREETS, ESTABLISHING A 30-MINUTE LIMITED PARKING ZONE ON BONNY DRIVE, SCOFIELD DRIVE, AND PEPPER TREE LANE, IN THE VICINITY OF FARIA SCHOOL THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN that Chapter 11.24, Section 1 !.24.170 be amended to add the following: Period of Sides o__f Street Time Hours Street Portion Exceptions Pepper Tree 30 8:00 a.m.- Both Between Stelling Road and When school is Lane 3:30 p.m., Bonny Drive not in session M-F Scofield Drive 30 8:00 a.m.- Both Between Barbara Lane and When school is 4:00 p.m., Western Drive not in session M-F Bonny Drive 30 8:00 a.m.- Both Between Scofield Drive and When school is 3:30 p.m., Shelly Drive not in session M-F INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City of Cupertino this 3rd day of March, 2003, and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City of Cupertino this __ day of ,2003, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED: Mayor, City of Cupertino FARIA ACADEMICS PLUS SCHOOL Cupertino Union School District Dolly Travers, Principal 10155 Barbara Lane Cupertino, California 95014 Phone (408) 252-0706 FAX (408) 253-0271 February 13, 2003 Ralph Qualls, Director Public Works Department Cupertino City Hall 10300 Torre Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Dear Mr. Qualls, The Faria School Site Council would like to address the Cupertino City Council at their March 3, 2003 meeting to report on the results of our trial period for 30-minute parking around Faria Elementary School and to request that this "unloading zone" be made permanent. We thank you and your staff for their assistance and guidance in helping to make our pilot project for 30-minute parking a reality for the first half of this school year. We have seen a positive impact on the traffic congestion in our neighborhood. Before the 30 minute parking began, the number of cars driving into our parking lot was an average of 256.5 in the mornings and 201 in the afternoon. After initiation of the 30- minute parking project, the number of cards driving into our parking lot in the mornings is 221.5, a reduction of 13.6%, and in the afternoons we have an average of only 136.3 cars, a reduction of 32.2% less cars! We continue to aggressively encourage our parent to carpool. Currently, 18% of our students are carpooling in the morning and 37% in the afternoon. Other positive results from allowing parents to park and walk their young children to school include: Less observable gridlock on the street which allows neighbors to enter and leave their homes. No more backing up along Peppertree and at the intersection of Peppertree and Barbara. We sent a survey to all families asking them to indicate their support of our 30- minute parking trial. We received a 99% return rate and all these families specified that they would like the 30-minute drop-off zone status to continue. Our families also indicated that they understood the need to be safe, courteous, and to follow the DMV rules of the road. We have fewer students late to class in the morning. Should our parents be allowed to continue to park for 30 minutes at school arrival and dismissal times, Faria will continue to send regular reminders to our parents though our school's newsletter and incorporate our neighborhood's parking rules at all future back to school nights. In closing, the Site Council would like to submit our findings on the 30-minute parking pilot project around Faria Elementary School at the March 3, 2003 Cupertino City Council meeting to request that the Council authorize the 30-minute parking zone be made permanent. Sincerely, Dolly Travers CITY OF CUPEI INO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department AGENDA NO. I~ SUMMARY AGENDA DATE March 3, 2003 SUMMARY: Discuss how hillside exceptions for residential development are reviewed and approved. RECOMMENDATION: Discuss the hillside exception process. No action is involved, since this is a discussion item. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission approved a hillside exception for a new residence at 11837 Upland Way on January 13, 2003 (EXC-2002-10, Yeh). This was a re- approval of a hillSide exception granted in 2000, which subsequently expired prior to issuance of building permits. Council member Richard Lowenthal appealed the Planning Commission decision, and subsequently withdrew his appeal. Instead, he requested that the hillside exception process be reviewed to better understand on what basis hillside exceptions are granted. DISCUSSION: Background on hillside regulations The General Plan provides the foundation for development in the hillsides (see Exhibit A). The policies are designed to allow development with minimum impacts on the natural hillsides. The Residential Hillside Ordinance (Exhibit B) establishes the regulations for building in the hillsides. These two documents establish the following main hillside regulations: · Avoidance of building structures on ridgelines: new structures shall not disrupt a fifteen percent site line from a prominent ridge (see Appendix A in the ordinance). · Avoidance of geologic hazards: A geological report shall be prepared by a certified engineering geologist if a structure is located within a geological hazard area. Printod on Rocyctod Papor I ~" ~ [ Discussion of hillside exceptions March 3, 2003 Reducing visible mass by stepping structures down the hillside and following natural contours: The building shall follow as closely as possible the primary natural contour of the lot. Avoidance of steep slopes: No structure or improvements shall occur on slopes greater than thirty percent unless an exception is granted. Minimizing disturbance of land and vegetation: All site grading shall be limited to a cumulative total of 2,500 cubic yards. There are a number of other regulations that minimize hillside impacts, including maximum house size, required landscaping, offset building and roof elements and use of natural colors. The Residential Hillside Ordinance establishes an exception process for any proposal that exceeds the requirements of the ordinance. (See Section 19.40.140in the enclosed Ordinance. An exception may be granted if thirteen findings are made, as shown in this section. Recent hillside exceptions In the last five years, 11 hillside exceptions have been approved by the Planning Commission (see Exhibit C). Eight exceptions were for new residences and three were for additions. The column titled "Additional Mitigation Required" refers to mitigations beyond those in the regulations. For example, regulations require avoiding building on a ridgeline; additional mitigation might be requiring a lower location than the applicant originally proposed, as in the case of 01-EXC- 00. The staff report and enclosures for EXC-2002-10 are included in this report, since this was the application originally appealed by Council member Lowenthal, and it can serve as an example of how the hillside impacts are addressed. Enclosures: Exhibit A: General Plan Hillside Policies Exhibit B: Residential Hillside Ordinance Exhibit C: Hillside Exceptions 1998-2003 Exhibit D: Staff Report, EXC-2002-10 Discussion of hillside exceptions March 3, 2003 Prepared by: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development G:plaxmmg/pdreport/cc/cchillside exception 3-3-03 Approved by: David W. Knapp City Manager Land Use/Commun(ty Character tween Cupertino and adjacent cities, and involving only urbanized, valley floor locations. The long term growth boundary provides services within the boundary for the next 20-30 years. [] Policy 2-42 Clustering Development in Major Subdivisions Lots in major subdivisions in the 5-20 acre slope density designation shall be clustered, reserving 90% of ,the land in private open space to protect the unique characteristics of the hillsides from adverse environmental impacts. The project shall keep the open space area contiguous as much as possible. Strategy Change the Municipal Code to include this requirement. Require that sig- nificant natural features, such as vegetation, slopes over 30%, creeks and water courses, faults, landslides and prominent ridgelines be shown so that the area for clustered development can be determined. Require an open space easement or an open space zoning district on the 90% undeveloped area. [] Policy 2-43: Private Open Space Zoning Establish a private open space zoning district which would allow an owner to designate portions of his property for open space with provisions for trail easements, maintenance standards and other items consistent with preserv- ing the property in its natural state while retaining it in private ownership. [] Policy 2-44: Clustering Development in Minor Subdivisions Encourage clustering of development for minor subdivisions in the 5-20 acre slope density designation. Encourage reserving and dedicating 90% of the land in private open space to protect the unique characteristics of the hill- sides from adverse environmental impacts. The project shall keep the open space contiguous as much as possible. Strategy Change the Municpal Code to include these guidelines. Policy 2-45: Hillside Building Standards Establish stricter building and development standards for the hillside area which, among other things, would provide that views of the ridgelines re- main unobstructed and that designs, colors and materials for homes and other structures blend with the natural hillside environment. [] Policy 2-46: Ridgeline Visibility 9/OO No structures shall be located on r/dgelines if visible from new and established valley floor vantage points unless it is determined that sigrdficantly greater environmental impacts would occur if structures are located elsewhere. THE CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN EXHIBIT A 2-39 SEE MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAI'I ER 19.24 SEE MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 19.40 2-40 SEE POLICY 6-1 Land Use/Community Character Strateg!/ Amend the Municipal Code to state that structures shall not disrupt the natural silhouette of ridgelines as viewed from new and established van- tages points on the valley floor. Consider the addition of new vantage points such'as Foothill Boulevard, McClellan Road, Rainbow Drive, Bubb Road and Regnart Road. [] Policy2-47: Location of Structures Locate proposed structures to minimize the impacts on adjacent hillside properties and public open space. [] Policy 2-48: Avoidance of Geolog~c Hazards Identify geological hazards on sites proposed for development and avoid or limit development in those areas. Strategy Amend the Municpal Code to reflect these pohcies. [] Policy 2-49: Reducing Visible Mass Effective visible mass shall be reduced through such means as stepping structures down the hillside, following the natural contours, and limiting the height and mass of the wall plan facing the valley floor. Strategy Incorporate color, materials and height requirements into the Municipal Code. Policy 2-50: Outdoor Lighting Outdoor lighting should be low intensity and shielded to minimize illumi- nation off-site. Policy 2,51: Building Heights Provide development standards which limit the height and visual impact of structures. Strategy Amend the Municipal Code to further limit the height requirements, includ- ing overall height and the perceived height of multiple levels from the downhill elevation perspective. THE CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN 9/00 Land Use/Community Charactei' [] Policy2-52: Steep Slopes No structures or improvements shall occur on slopes greater than 30% un- less an exception is granted. Strategy Amend the Municipal code to ,include this requirement. There will be some scarring from hillside development as roads, housing sites and public and private subdivision improvements are graded. So, improvement standards must balance the need to fumlsh adequate utility and emergency services against the need to protect the hillside, vegetation and animals. Roads should be narrowed to avoid harming trees and streambeds. Grading should be kept to a minimum by prohibiting mass grading for building sites and by allowing narrow driveways, instead of public streets, to serve more than one lot. [] Policy 2-53: Rural Improvement Standards in the Foothills Require rural improvement standards in the residential hillside zoning or- dinance and the hillside subdivision regulations to preserve the rural char£ acter of the hillside. Strategies Mass Grading in New Construction. Follow'natural land contour and avoid mass grading in new construction, especially in flood hazard or hill- side areas. Grading large, flat yard areas shall be avoided. Retaining Significant Trees. Retain significant specimen trees, especially when they grow in groves or clusters, and integrate them into the devel- oped site. The Montebello foothills at the south and west boundaries of the valley floor are a scenic backdrop to the City, adding to its sense of scale and variety of color. It's impossible to guarantee an unobstructed view of the hills from any vantage point, but people should be able to see the foothills from public gathering places. [] Policy 2-54: Views for Public Facilities Design and lay out public facilities, particularly public open spaces, so they include views of the foothills or other nearby natural features, and plan hillside developments to minimize visual and other impacts on adjacent public open space. Strategy Development Near Public Open Space. Remove private driveways and building sites as far as possible from property boundaries located next to public open space preserves and parks to enhance the natural open space character and protect plants and animals. 9/OO THE CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN 2-41 SEE POLICY 2-39 SEE MUNICIPAL Con~, CHA~ 18-1.13 SEE POLICIES 5-13 THROUGH 5-16 2-42 SEE POLICIES 5-15, 5-16, POLICY 6-22 Land Use/Community Character When highly sensitive natural areas such as those subject to floods, brush fires, earth- quakes and landslides become part of a city, human life must be protected. [] Policy.2-55: Hillside Development Proposal Analysis Subj&'ct proposals for hillside development to prior investigation by profes- sional consultants so that environmental dangers can be noted and solutions suggest, cd to lessen potential hazards. [] Policy 2-56: Land Disturbance During Development Be sure that natural land forms and significant plants and trees are disturbed as little as possible during development. All cut and fill shall be rounded to natural contours and planted with natural landscaping. Strategy Amend the Municipal Code to include the two new requirements. Specify a maximum quantity of allowed cut and fill to help define an acceptable · grading quantity. Most of the hillsides in Cupertino's planning area are unincorporated and undevel- oped, so County policies dictate their final land use. County policies provide for low den- sity residential, agricultural, park, open space and wildlife uses, as well as mineral resource extraction. Clustering and dedication of open space are required for residential develop- ment. Most policies are compatible with Cupertino's, except for those relating to expan- sion of mineral resource areas, which conflict with the City,s hillside protection and compatible land use policies. County development, particularly if located near Cupertino's urban fringe area, should consider Cupertino's General Plan. Visual impacts, road access, traffic impacts and other .service demands should be assessed in consultation with Cupertino's plans and personnel. [] Policy 2-57: Santa Clara County General Plan Hillsides policies found in the Santa Clara County General Plan in effect in 1992 are included in the Cupertino General Plan by reference and are ap- plicable to the unincorporated hillside area. These policies are incorporated because they are consistent with hillside protection goals. If changes are proposed in the County plan which are inconsistent with the City's hillside protection goals, then the City should protest those changes as well as not incorporate them into the City's General Plan. [] Policy 2-58: County Development County development, particularly if located near Cupertino's urban fringe area, should consider Cupertino's General Plan. Joint Hillside Planning The following policy is the approach selected to achieve long term hillside protection. THE CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN 9/00 Chapter 19.40 RESIDENTIAL 1-11LLSIDE (RHS) ZONES* Sections: 19.40.010 19.40.020 19.40.030 !9.40.040 19.40.050 19.40.060 19.40.070 19.40.080 19.40.090 19.40.100 19.40.110 19.40.120 19.40.130 19.40.140 19.40.145 Pnrpose. Applicability of regulations. Permitted uses. Conditional uses. Site development regulations. Building coverage, setbacks and height restrictious. Design standards. Fencing. Permitted yard encroachment. Geologic and soils report procedures. Private roads and driveways. Solar design. Interpretation of planning director. Exceptions for development of certain individual hillside lots. Applicability. * Prior kisto~d: Ord. 1601. 19.40.010 Purpose. The purpose of the RHS zoning district is to regulate development commensurate with community goals, as described ia the General Plan, to preserve the natural setting in the hillsides. This chapter utilizes performance standards and specific regulations to ensure that the utilization of land for residential uses is balanced with the need to con- serve natural resources and protect life and property from natural ba?~rds. Specifically, this chapter is intended to accomplish the following, objectives: A. Enhance the identity of residential neighbor- hoods; B. Eusure the provision of light and air to iadi- vidual residential parcels; C. Ensure a reasonable level of compatibility in scale of structures within residential neighborhoods; 588-17 EXHIBIT B . 19.4O.OLO D. Maintain spatial relationship between struc-. tures and'withia neighborhoods; ' E. Reinforce the predominantly Iow-intensity setting of the community; F. Maintain abalance between residential devel- opment and preservation of the natural hillside set- ting; G. Promote compatibility of colors and materials of structures and the surrounding natural setting. (Ord. 1634 (part), 1993) 19.40.020 Applicability of regulations. No building or structure or land shall be used, and no building or structure shall be hereafter erect- ed, structurally altered or enlarged in a residential hillside (RI-IS) zone, otherwise than in conformance with the provisions of this chapter and other applica- ble pmvisious of this rifle. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chap- ter to the contrary, stxuctures which were legally constructed prior to the effective date of the ordi- nance codified in this section shall be deemed legal- ly conforming; provided, however, that any structur- al alteration, enlargement or remodeling of such existing structure shall either comply with the site development regulations (building coverage, set- backs, height restrictions and design standards) of thl.q chapter or shall obtain an exception as Provided in Section 19.40.140.. (Ord. 1725 (,part), 1996: Ord. 1634 (part), 1993) 19.40.030 Permitted uses. The foUcwing uses shall be permitted in an RI-IS zoning district: A. Single-family dwelling units with not more than one dwelling unit per lot; B. A second dwelling unit which conforms to the procedure, standards and requirements of Chap- ter 19.84 of this code; C. Home occupations which conform to the procedure, standards and requirements of Chapter 19.92 of this code; D. Accessory buildings which conform to the procedures, standards and requirements of Chapter 19.80 of this code; (Cugerfino 12-96) ~ 19.40.030 E. SmallofamJ.ly day care home; .. F. Residential care facility with six or less resi- dents not including the provider, provider family or staff, that has a license from the appropriate State, County agency or department; G. The keeping of animals as follows: 1. Household pets limited to one animal per three thousand square feet of lot area except: a~ Adult dogs are limited to a maximum of two for lots less than one acre and four for lots greater than one acre, b. The number of geese, ducks, chickens, rabbits and other farm animals are not limited on a site greater than one acre, 2. Small household pets, 3. Large anlmal~, such as horses, cows, sheep, and goats, limited as follows: a. Two large animals for the fa'st forty thousand squa.--~ feet of land 'area, except mules and donkeys which require eighty thousand square feet for the first animal, b. One additional large animal for each twenty thousand square feet of land area, c. One additional large animal if said animal is raised for a 4H project, a project sponsored by recognized agricultural organization or a school project, 4. The required lot ama for a large animal shall not b~ included in the required lot area for a house- hold pet or vice versa, except that a maximum of two household pets rnay be kept with large animals, 5. Ail animals must be kept and maintained in accordance with other Cupertino or Santa Clara County codes and 'ordinances, 6. No animals kept and malntalm'~ in an PHS zoning district may b~ raised for commercial pur- poses, 7. Crop, tree or horticultural farming for person- al use. Produce grown on the site may be sold if the business activity is conducted in a manner consistent with the home occupation ordinance; H. Large family day care home which meets the parking criteria corltained in Chapter 19.100, and which is at least three hundred feet from any other large-family day care home. The Director of munity Development or Ms/her designee shall administratively apprOVe large day care homes to ensure compliance with the parking and proximity requirements; I. Congregate residence with ten or less resi- dents.(Ord. 1658 (part), 1995; Ord. 1688 § 3 (part); 1995; Ord. 1657 (part), 1994; Ord. 1634 (part), 1993) 19.40.040 Conditional uses. The following uses may be conditionally allowed in the R/IS zoning district subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit: A. Issued by the Director of Community Devel- · opment: 1. Temporary uses subject to regulations estab- lished by Chapter 19.128 of this code, 2. Large-family day care home which otherwise does not meet the criteria for a permitted use. The conditional use permit shall be processed as provid- ed by Section 1597.46(3) of the State of California Health and Safety Code, 3. The keeping of any animal not otherwise permitted in Section 19.40.030G, 4. Home occupations that require a conditional use permit pursuant to Chapter 19.92 of this code, 5. Buildings or structures which incorporate solar design features that require variations from setbacks, upon a determination by the Director that the design feature or features will not result in pri- vacy impacts, shadowing, or intensive noise, odor, or other adverse impacts to the surrounding area, 6. Second dwelling units which require a condi- tional use permit pursuant to Chapter 19.84 of thi~ code, 7. Crop, tr~ or horticultural farming for com- mercial purposes; B. Issued by the Planning Commission: 1. Limited commercial recreation uses, such as riding clubs and related stables and trails, golf courses, swimming and picnic grounds, 2. Residential care facility, that is not required to obtain a license by the State, County agency or depatm~ent and has six or less residents, not includ- ing the provider, provider family or staff, 588-18 19.40.040 3. Residential care facility, that has the appropri- ate State, County agency or department license and has seven or greater residents, not including the provider, provider family or stuff, is a minimum distance of five hundred feet from the property · boundary of another residential care facility, 4. Resi~lential care facility, that is not required to obtain a permit from the State, County agency or department license and has seven or greater resi- dents, not including the provider, provider family or staff, is a minimum distance of five hundred feet from the property boundary of another residential care facility and has a minimum of seventy-five square feet of usable rear yard area per occupant, 5. Congregate residence with eleven or more residents, is a minimum of one thousand feet from the boundary of another congregate residence and has a minimum of seventy-five square feet of usable rear yard area per occupant (Ord. 1658 (part), 1995; Ord. 1688 § 3 (part), 1995; Ord. 1657 (part), 1994; Ord. 1634 (part), 1993) 19.40~050 Si~ development regulations. The following guidelines are a compilation of policies described in the General Plan and are in- tended to govern the preparation of development plans in RHS zones. All provisions of this section, except subsections A, B and C, may be deviated from upon an exception granted by the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 19.40.140. A. ~ Dwelling Unit Density. 1. The residential density for development with- in an RHS zoning district shall be dete,--rr~ned by the General Plan, based upon slope density standards described therein. 2. Upon recordation of a subdivision map or parcel map in an RHS zoning district, density cred- its derived from application of a slope density for- mula to a lot or ~oup of lots may not be transferred to property outside the subdivision or parcel map boundary. B. Lot Area. 1. The minimum lot area for a specific property shall correspond to the number following the RHS zoning symbol (multiplied by one thousand square feet). Examples are as follows: Zoning Symbol Number ~/flnlmu~, Lot Are~ In Square Feet PHS 20 20,000 PHS 40 40,000 PHS 80 80,000 RI-IS 120 120,000 RHS 180 180,000 P.I-IS 200 200,0O0 PHS 4O0 400,000 2. For purposes of subctivision, the minimum lot area shall be the average lot area computation for a zero percent:slope gradient as contained in Appen- dix E of the General Plan, unless clustered in accor- dance with Section 18.52.030 CHillside Subdivi- sions). These lot sizes are approximately twelve thousand square feet for the Foothill Modified, twenty-one thousand square feet for the Foothill 1/2 acre modified and two hundred eighteen thousand square feet for the 5-20. The minimum lot size in a clustered subdivision is ten thousand square feet. Lots which potentially are subdividable will be assigned a lot size number at the time of subdivi- sion. 3. The minimum lot area for legally-created, deveIoped lots, which are not subdividable, shall reflect the existing lot size. C. LotWidth Minimum. The minimum lot width in an RI-IS zoning district is seventy feet, measured at the front setback line; provided, however, that there is no minimum lot width for lots served by a private driveway and which do not adjoin a public s~eet. D. Development on Substandard Lo~s. No struc- tures or improvements proposed on existing, vacant legal lots in the Foothill Modified and Foothill Modified Half Acre slope density designations of the General Plan which are substandard in size, shall occur unless an exception is granted. E. Lots Adjoining Public Open Spaces. For lots adjacent to public open space preserves or parks, the 588-19 (Cupe~no g-96) 19.40.050 driveway and building shall be located in a manner to be set as far as feasible from the preserve or park and designed in a manner to minimize impacts on the preserve or park. F. Site Grading. 1. Ail site grading shall be limited to a cumula- tive total of two thousand five hundred cubic yards, cut plus fill. The two thousand five hundred cubic yards includes grading for building pad, yard areas, driveway and all other areas requiring grading, but does not include basements. The graded area shall be limited to the building pad area to the greatest extent possible. Grading quantities for multiple driveways shall be divided equally among the pa~dc- ipating lots, e.g., two lots sharing a driveway will divide the driveway grading quantity in half. The divided share will be charged against the grading quantity allowed for that lot development. A maxi- mum of two thousand square feet of flat yard area, excluding driveways, may be graded. All cut and fill areas shall be rounded to follow the natural contours and planted with landscaping which meets the re- quirements in Section 19.40.050G. 2. A licensed landscape architect shall review grading plans and, in consultation with the applicant a_nd the City Engineer, shall submit a plan to pre- vent soil erosion and to screen out and fill slopes. G. Landscaping. 1. A licensed landscape architect shall prepare a tree planting plan for the site which will screen grading areas, and residential structures~to the great- est possible extent, as well as to reintroduce trees on barren slopes which were denuded by prior agricul- rural activities. 2. Landscape improvement shall meet the re- qu~ements as established in the Xeriscape Land- scaping Ordinance, Chapter 14.15 of this code. 3. Landscape improvements shall be installed prior to occupancy unless such installation is im- practicable, in which case, the applicant shall post a bond, cash or other security to insure installation within an eighteen-month period from occupancy. All such landscape areas shall be properly main- tained. 4. No specimen sized trees may be removed without a permit as provided for in the Heritage and Specimen Tree Ordinance, Chapter 14.18 of this code. Native trees should be integrated into the site design to the greatest extent possible. H. Watercourse Protection. 1. Any w~tercourse identified in Figure 6-J of the Cupertino General Plan and its existing riparian vegetation must be shown on all development plans. 2. All new development, including structures, grading and clearing, must be set back at least fifty feet on lots which are less than one acre in size and one hundred feet on lots which are greater than one acre. The setback shall be measured from the top of bank of the watercourses or from existing riparian vegetation, whichever is greater. The setback from riparian vegetation will be measured from the drip line perimeter. I. Development Near Prominent Ridgelines. 1. The development of new, independent struc- tures shall not disrupt a fifteen percent site line from a prominent ridge as identified in Appendix A. The fifteen percent site line shall be measured 'from the top of ridge at the closest point from the structure. 2. Additions to legally existing homes located within the fifteen percent site line of a prominent ridgeline may not further encroach into the site line, e.g., the addition may not add height or bulk which may increase the disruption to the fifteen percent ridgeline site line. 3. Should these requirements become impracti- cal, alternatives will be considered through the exception process. J. Development on Slopes of Thirty Percent or Greater. 1. Site plans for all development proposals shall include topographical information at contour inter- vals not to exceed ten feet and a horizontal map scale of one inch equals two hundred feet or larger. Areas where slopes exceed thirty percent shall be identified on the site development plan. 2. No structure or improvements shall occur on slopes greater than thirty percent unless an exception is granted or unless no more than five hundred square feet of development, including grading and ((2upe~n~ g-96) 588-20 19.40.050 structures, occurs on an area with a slope ~eater than thirty percent. K. Trail Linkages. 1. Among other items requked to be identified on the site plan, the site plan shall identify frail linkages as shown in the General Plan Trail Plan, on and adjacent to the site. 2. If a trail linkage, as shown in the General Plan Trail Plan, is identified across a property being developed, no development shall take place within that area except if approved through the exception process. L. Views and Privacy. It is notthe responsibility of City Government to ensure the privacy protection of the bu;.lding permit applicant or owners of sur- rounding properties that may be affected by the structure under construction. However, the Director of Community Development may confer with the building permit applicant to discuss alternate means of preventing privacy intrusion and preserving views. (Ord. 1725 (part), 1996; Ord. 1658 (part), 1995; Ord. 1634 (part), 1993) 19.40.060 Building coverage, setbacks and height restrictions. Ail provisions of this section may be deviated ~om upon an exception granted by the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 19.40.140. A. Floor Area. 1.a. For lots with less than ten thousand square feet of net lot area the maximum floor area ratio shall be forty-five percent of the net lot area. Formula: ' "'A = 0.45 B A = Maximum allowable house size. B = Net lot area. , b. 'For lots with more than ten thousand square feet of net lot area the maximum floor area shall be four thousand five hundred square feet plus 59-59 square feet for every one thousand square feet over ten thousand square feet of net lot area. In all cases the maximum floor area shall not exceed six thou- sand five hundred square feet without an exception. Formula: A = ((B - 10,000)/1,000)(5~.59) + 4,500 A = Maximum a/lowable house size prior to instituting the maximum 6,500 square foot building size. B = Net lot area. 2. Lots Within Clustered Subdivisions Conmln- ing Common Open Space. Lots within clustered subdivisions in which land is reserved as common open space, may count a proportionate mount of the reserved private open space for calculating the allowable house size, except that no developable lot would be subject to greater than a forty-five-percent floor area ratio prior to slope consideration. The average slope of a lot with_in a clustered subdivision shall be calculated on the developable lot. 3. Slope Adjustment Criteria, For lots with an average slope greater than ten percent, the allowable floor area, prior to instituting the maximum six thousand five hundred square foot allowable build- ing size, shall be reduced by one and one-half per- cent for each percent of slope over ten percent. For lots with an average slope over thirD, percent the allowable floor area shall be reduced by a constant thirty pement. Formula: c = A x (1-(1_~ x (D - 03))) A = Maximum allowable house size based on subsection 1 above prior to instituting the maximum 6,500 square foot building size. C = Maximum allowable btlilding for lots with greater ~un 10% average slope. D = Average percent slope of net lot area. Ave. slope Reduction Ave. slope Reduction 10% or less 0% 17% 10.5% 11% 1.5% 18% 12% 12% 3% 19% 13.5% 13% 4.5% 20% 15% 14% 6% 21% 16.5% 15% 7.5% 22% 18% 16 % 9% 23 % 19.5 % 588-21 Ave. slope Reduction 24% 21% 25% 22.5% 26% 24% 27% 25.5% 28% 27% 29% 28.5% 30°/'o or greater 30% B. Setbacks--First Floor. 1. Front Yard. The minimum front yard setback is twenty feet, except that if the grade exceeds twen- ty percent within the first twenty feet from tl-.e street elevation, the minimum front yard setback may be ten feet. The driveway and garage must be desig'ned to enable vehicles to park off-slreet. 2. Side Yard. The mJnlmum side yard setback is ten feet, provided that a minimum of fifteen feet shall be provided on the street side of a corner lot. 3. Rear Yard. The minimum rear yard setback shall be twenty feet. C. Setbacks--Second Floor. 1. Front Yard. The minimum front yard setback shall be twenty-five feet. 2. Side Yard. The minimum side yard setback shall be Fifteen feet. 3. Rear Yard. The miniranm rear yard setback shall be twenty-five feet. 4. Downhill Elevation. The downhill elevation shall be offset in the following manner, at least seventy-five percent of the second story downhill facing wall plane shall be set back an average of seven and one-half feet and in no case less than five feet from the first:story downhill wall plane. The remaining twenty-five percent may not extend past the first story wall plane. 5. Should the downhill contours notbe confined to one elevation, then the downhill offset shall be applicable to the primary setback affected. 6. A second story offset may be measured from the outside perimeter of the first-story roofed porch- es. The roof of the porch must match, in pitch and style, the roof of the main structure. The porch must also be at least five feet in width and extend the len~h of the wall on which it i~ located. (CuPemno ~-96) D. Setback--Habitable Third Floor. The mini- mum setbacks for a habitable third floor shall be the same as those for a second floor, except that the minimum side yard setback shall be twenty feet. E. Height of Principal Buildings and Structures. 1. The maximum height of a principal building in an RI-IS zone shall be thirty feet (excluding chim- neys, antennae, or other appurtenances). 2. HeiSts exceeding twenty feet shall be subject to the setback regulations prescribed in Section 19.40.060D and E. 3. The maximum wall height on the downhill elevation shall be faeteen feet. (Ord. 1725 (part), 1996; Ord. 1658 (part), 1995; Ord. 1634 (pan), 1993) 19.40.070 Design stantlard~. All provisions of this section may be deviated frorn upon an exception granted by the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 19.40.140. A. Building and Roof Forms. 1. The building shall follow as closely as possi- ble the primary natural contour of the lot. The main building ma_qs shall be on the upslope side of the building and the roof pitches shall trend dowuslope. 2. Second story dormers are permitted within the second story setbacks as long as they are minor in shape and size. 3. The downhill eievation of the main structure shall have a minimum of four offset building and roof elements. These requirernents are intended toG provide varied building forms to produce shadow patterns which reduce the impact of visual mass. 4. Wall planes exceeding one story o~ twenty feet in height, whichever is mom restrictive, must couta~n ar~hitecBJl'al elements which provide relief and break up expansive wall planes. B. Colors. Exterior colors of all structures on the lot shall use natural earth tone and/or vegetation colors which complement the natural surroundings and shall not exceed a refiectivity value of sixty on a fiat surface. Natural earth-tone and vegetation colors include natural hues of brown, ~een and shades of gray. 588-22 19.40.070 C. Outdoor Lighting. All outdoor lighting shall be identified on the site development plan. No high- intensity lights are permitted for tennis courts or other recreational purposes. Movement-activated security lights, not to exceed one hundred watts, are permitted but must be shielded to avoid all off-site kntmsion. All other lights must be directed to meet the particular need. (Ord. 1725 (part), 1996; Ord. 1634 (part), 1993) 19.40.080 Fencing. All provisions of this section may be deviated from upon an exception granted by the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 19.40.140. All fences in an RHS zoning district shall be gov- erned by the following regulations: A. Solid board fencing shall: 1. Not be limited on lots of. less than thirty thonsand squ~re feet net area; 2. Be limited to a five thousand square foot area (excluding the principal building) for lots exceeding thirty thousand square feet in net lot azea~ B. Open fencing (composed of materials which result in a minimum of seventy-five percent visual transparency) shall be unrestricted except that such fencing over three feet in height may not be con- stmcted within the front yard setback. (Ord. 1634 (part), 1993) 19.40.090 Permitted yard encroachment. Ail provisions of this section may be deviated from upon an exception granted by the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 19.40.140. A. Architecture.1 features (not including patio covers) may extend into a required yard a distance not exceeding three feet. provided, that no architec- Varal feature or combination thereof, whether a portion of a principal or accessory structure, may extend closer than three feet to any property line. B. Additions to Existing Structures. Except for structures located within the prominent ridgeline site line, where a single-family dwelling legally con- structed according to existing yard and setback regulations at the time of construction encroaches upon present required yards, one encroaching side 588-22a of the existing structure may be extended along the existing building lines even when the existing first floor setbacks do not meet the requirements Of this chapter. Only one such extension shall be permitted for the life of such building. This applies to the first story only. Tl~s section shall not be construed to allow the further extension of an encroachment by any building which is the result of the granting of a variance, either before or after such building be- comes part of the Oty. Tne extension or addition may not further encroach into any required setback; e.g., a single story may be extended along an exist- ing five-foot side yard setback even though the other side yard does not equal ten feet. However, in no case shall any wall plane of a first story addition be placed closer than three feet to any property line. (Ord. 1634 (part), 1993) 19.40.100 Geologic and soils report procedures. A. A geological report prepared by a certified engineering geologist and a soils report prepared by a registered civil engineer qualified in soils mechan- ics by the state shall be submitted prior to the issu- mace of a building permit for construction of any building or stmcture which: 1. Is located on property in an RHS zoning dismict wb_ich has been designated by the General Plan to be witl,2n a geological hazard area; and 2..Where an addition, alteration or repair of ~ existing building or structure include at least one of the following: a. The improvements include increasing the occupancy capacity of the dwelling such as adding a bedroom or secondary unit, or b. The cost of the completed addition, alteration or repairs will, during any period of twelve months, exceed twenty-five pement of the value of the exist- lng improvements as determined by the building official based on current per foot value of the pro- posed structure to the existing smacture's value on a parcel of property. For the purposes of this sec- tion, the value of existing improvements shall be deemed to be the estimated cost to rebuild the ira- (£upcrtlno 8-98) 19.40.100 provement$ in kind, which value shall be determined by the building official. B. These reports shall be filed in conjunction with a site development plan and, in addition to the requirements of Chapter 16.12 of tiffs code, shall contain: 1. All pertinent 0~ta~ interpretations and evalua- tions, based upon the most current professionally recognized soils and geologic data; 2. The significance of the interpretations and evaluations with respect to the actual development or implementation of the intended land use through identification of any significant geologic problems, critically expansive soils or other unstable soil con- ditions which ff not corrected may lead to structural damage or aggravation of these geologic problems both on- and off-site; 3. Recommendations for corrective measures deemed necessary to prevent or signilicanfly miti- gate potential damages to the proposed project and adjacent properties otto otherwise insure safe devel- opment of the property; 4. Recommendations for additional investiga- tions that should be made to insure safe develop- ment of the property; 5. Any other information deemed appropriate by the City Engineer. C. No building permit shall be issued for the construction of any building or structure on property which is subject to regulation under this section, unless the building and site plans incorporate the above-described corrective measures and unless the plans are approved by the City Engineer. (Ord. 1634 (part), 1993) 19.40.110 Private roads and driveways. Ail provisions of this section may be deviated from upon an exception granted by the Planning Commission in accordance with Section 19.40.140. A. Pavement Width and Design. The pavement width and design for a private road or common driveway serving two to five lots and a single-lot driveway shall comply with development standards co~taiqed in the Hillside Subdivision Ordinance, Chapter 18.52 of this code. B. Reciprocal Ingress/Egress. An applicant for a building permit for a lot served by a private road or 'common driveway shall record an appropriate deed restriction guaranteeing reciprocal in- gress/egress easement to adjoining property owners who utilize the private road or common driveway for the primary access to their lot(s). C. R<iprocal Maintenance Agreement. The applicant for a building permit for a lot served by a private road or COmmon driveway shall record an appropriate deed restriction guaranteeing participa- tion in a reciprocal maintenance agreement with other lot owners utilizing the private road or com- mon driveway for primary access. D. Gates. Gates may be used to COntrol access to private roads and driveways provided that the design of the gate, including location, a~mension and the locking devices, are approved by the Direc- tor of Community Development after consultation with the Central Fire District. (Ord. 1784 (part), 1998; Ord. 1634 (part), 1993) 19.40.120 Solar design. The setback and height restrictions provided in this chapter may be varied for a structure utilized for Passive or active solar purposes; provided, that no such slxucture shall infringe upon solar access or property rights of adjoining property owners. Any solar structure which requires variation from the setback or height resffictions of this chapter may be permitted upon issuance of an exception by the Planning Commission. (Ord. 1634 (part), 1993) 19.40.130 Interpretation of planning director. The Director of Commnnity Development shall be empowered to make reasonable interpretations of the regulations and provisions of this chapter, con- sistent with the legislative intent thereof. Persons aggrieved by an interpretation of this chapter by the Director of Comm~2uity Development may petition the Planning Commission in writing for review of the interpretation. (Ord. 1634 (part), 1993) 588-22b 19.40.140 19.40,140 Exception for development of certain individual hillside lots. A. With respect to a request for development of a legally created individual hillside lot which does not meet the development requirements contained in Sections 19.40.050D through M and 19.40.060 through 19.40.090 and 19.40.110 through 19.42.120 of this chapter, the Planning Commission shall an exception to allow development if the subject property cannot be merged with adjacent propen'y pursuant to Government Code Sections 66451.1 66451.21 and if the commission, based upon sub- stantial evidence, makes all of the following £md- ings: 1. The proposed development will not be injuri- ous to property or improvements in the area nor be detrimental to the public health and safety. 2. The proposed development will not create a ba?~.rdous condition for pedestrian or vehicular traffic. 3. The proposed development has legal access to public streets and public services are available to serve the development. 4. The proposed development requires an excep- tion which involves the least modification of, or deviation from, the development regulations pre- scribed in this chapter necessary to accomplish a reasonable use of the parcel. 5. All alternative lecafions for development on the parcel have been considered and have been found to create greater environmental ~,,,pacts than the location of the proposed development. 6. The proposed development does not consist of structu_~s 6n or near known geological or envi- ronmental hazards which have been determined by expert testimony to be unsafe or haTardous to struc- tu.~s or persons residing therein. (See General Plan Policies 2-49.) 7. The proposed development includes grading and drainage plans which will ensure that erosion and scarring of the hillsides caused by necessary construction of ro~cl~ housing sites, and improve- ments will be minimized. (See Genera/Plan Policies 2-53, 2-54 and 2-57.) 588-22c 8. The proposed development does not consist of stvactures which would disrupt the natural silhou- ette of ridgelines as viewed from established vantage points on the valley floor unless either: a. The location of a structure on a ridgeline is necessary to avoid greater negative environmental impacts; or b. The structure could not otherwise be physical- ly located on the parcel and the size of the swacture is the minimum which is necessary, to allow for a reasonable use of the parcel. (See General Plan Policies 2-46, 2-47 and 2-48.) 9. The proposed development consists of struc- tures incorporating designs, colors, materials, and outdoor li~ating which blend with the natural hill- side environment and which are designed in such a manner as to reduce the effective visible including building height, ~s much as possible with- out creating other negative environmental impacts. (See General Plan Policies 2-46, 2-50, 2-51 and 2- 52.) · ..' ., 10. The proposed development is locat&t'On.the parcel as far as possible from publi6 .open:Space preserves or parks (if visible therefrom);' riparian corridors, and wildlife habitats unless ~uch loc~fion will create other, more negative en'vironmental ira-,-. pacts. (See General Plan Policies 2-55, 5,14 ~d 5- 11. The proposed development includes a land- scape plan which retains as many' sPeCimen trees'a~ possible, which utilizes drought-tolerant native plants and ground covers consistent with nearbY vegetation, and which mlnlrni:res lawn areas. (See General Plan Policies 2-54, 5-15 and 5-16.) 12. The proposed development 'confines solid fencing to the areas near a structure rather than around the entire site. (See General Plan Policy 5- 17.) 13. The proposed development is otherwise con- sistent with the City's General Plan and with the purposes of this chapter as described in Section 19.40.010. B. An application for exception must be submit- ted on a form as prescribed by the Director of Com- mtmity Development. The application shall be ac- (Cupertino 12-96) IF-/ 19.40.140 companied by a fee prescribed by City :Council resolution, no pa~. of which shall be.refundable, to the applicant. Upon receipt of an application for an exception; the Director shall issue a Notice of Public Hearing before the Planning Commission for an exception under this chapter in the same manner as provided in Section 19.120.060 (relating to zoning changes). After a public hearing, and consideration of the application in conjunction with the mandatory findings contained in subsection A above, the Plan- ning Commission shall approve, conditionally ap- prove or deny the application for an exception. The decision of the Planning Commission may be ap- pealed to the City Council as provided in Section 19.136.060. C. An exception which has not been used within two years following the effective date thereof, shall become null and void and of no effect unless a shorter time period shall specifically be prescribed by the conditions of such permit or variance. An exception permit shall be deemed to have been "used" in the event of the erection of a structure or structures when sufficient building activity has oc- curred and continues to occur in a diligent manner. D. In addition to any 'other remedies, the City Attorney is authorized to commence and maintain a civil action to enforce the provisions of thla chap- ter or any conditions attached to the granting of any permit or exception g,anted under this chapter. (Ord. 1725 (part), 1996; Ord. 1634 (part), 1993) 19.40.145 Applicability. This chapter shall apply to any permit filed after April 8, 1996, pro~)ided, however, that an exception previously granted, and for which building permits are obtained two years after t~he effective date of the ordinance codified in this section, is exempt. (Ord. 1725 (part), 1996) (Caperfi~o 12-96) 588-22d OVANTAGE POINT LOCATIONS · APPENDIX.A PR. OMINENT RII)GELINES Chapter 19.4fl of the Cupertino Municipal Code Adopler by tim City Commil raider 0rdhlance J634, Ocl~[)m' t I, 1993 HILLSIDE EXCEPTIONS 1998-2003 Exhibit C APP # Name & Location Type of Exception Additional Status as of Mitigation February 2003 Required 07-EXC-98 Thomas Hutton Hillside exception to locate Size of Constructed. 22820 San Juan a 2,500 sq. ft. addition to a addition was Road residence on a prominent reduced. ridgeline. 14-EXC-98 Tom McNair Hillside exception to allow Size of Preliminary 22261 McClellan construction of a 4,378 sq. residence was' grading. Road ft. single-family residence reduced. on slopes of 30% or more in an R1 zoning district. 15-EXC-98 David & Kim Hillside exception to Expired. Gudmundson demolish an existing 22362 Regnart residence and construct a Road new 6,500 sq. ft. residence on a prominent ridgeline. 16-EXC-98 Tersini Hillside exception to Constructed. Construction construct a 2,081 sq. ft. (DeCarli) addition to an existing 11640 Regnart residence on a prominent Canyon Road ridgeline. 04-EXC-99 Charles Williams Hillside exception for a 400 Constructed. 22770 Mercedes sq. ft. addition to an Road existing residence on a prominent ridgeline. 10-EXC-99 Derek Fluker Hillside exception to Foundation. 22811 San Juan construct a 2,881 sq. ft. Road residence on a prominent ridgeline, on slopes greater than 30%, an exception to exceed the allowed height; and an exception to allow less than four functionally independent parking spaces. 08-EXC-00 Daryl Fazekas Hillside exception to Residence was Constructed. 22350 Regnart construct a 6,500 sq. ft. lowered more Road residence on a prominent into hillside. ridgeline and on slopes greater than 30%. HILLSIDE EXCEPTIONS 1998-2003 Exhibit C APP # Name & Location Type of Exception Additional Status Mitigation Required 03-EXC-01 Via Builders, Inc. Hillside exception to Constructed. 22085 Regnart construct a 5,277 sq. ft. Road residence on slopes greater than 30% and for a grading quantity that exceeds 2,500 cubic yards. 07-EXC-01 Chihua D. Wei Hillside exception to Property sold. Mercedes Road construct a 2,189 sq. ft. New owner (342-22-044) residence on a vacant lot submitted on slopes greater than revised 30%. application. 08-EXC-01 Amar Gupta Hillside exception to Residence Reviewed by E1 Cerrito Road construct a 6,500 sq. ft. moved back Environmental (342-19-031) residence on a prominent from ridge, Review ridgeline, a private road pad lowered, Committee. and driveway on slopes front end of greater than 30% and to hill built up to exceed the 2,500 cubic yard conceal grading quantity, residence. EXC-2002-10 Chung Yeh Hillside exception to build Height of .Waiting for 11837 Upland a 4,538 sq. ft. residence on residence was building Way a prominent ridgeline and reduced and permit. on slopes greater than residence was 30%, to grade more than lowered into 2,500 cubic yards and to hillside. construct second story Applicant was decks, asked to personally notify adjacent neighbors. G: \ Planning \ Ciddy \ Exception Matrix.doc EXHIBIT D CITY OF CUPERTINO, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application No.: Applicant: Property Owner: Property Location: EXC-2002-10, EA-2002-10 Agenda Date: January 13, 2003 Ron Dick, Architect (for Chung Yeh) Chung Yeh 11837 Upland Way Application Summary: Hillside Exception to construct a 4538 square foot residence on a prominent ridgeline and on slopes greater than 30% and to exceed 2,500 cubic yards in grading quantity. A second story deck exception also is required. Environmental Assessment: Negative Declaration recommended. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of: 1. Negative Declaration (EA-2002-25) 2. Hillside Exception (EXC-2002-10) General Plan: Residential Very Low Density Foothill Modified 1/2 Acre Slope Density Formula Zoning: RHS-70 Parcel Size: 1.55 acres (net) Residence Square Feet: Allowed: 4550 sq. ft. ft. Height: Allowed: 30 ft. from natural grade Setbacks: Front: Sides: Allowed: (first) 20' (second) 25' Allowed: (first) 10' (second) 15' Rear: Allowed: 25' Proposed 4538 sq. Proposed: 22 ft. 10 inches from natural grade Proposed: 37' Proposed: 42' Proposed: 10' & 17' Proposed: 20' & 38' Proposed: 180' BACKGROUND: A hillside exception previously was granted for this property owner on November 27, 2000. A building permit was submitted, but was not issued prior to the expiration of the hillside exception on November 27, 2002. The building permit has been approved by all departments, except public works related to minor erosion control measures and improvement agreement documents, and the building department related to three building code questions. The hillside ordinance does not provide for an extension, so the property owner is filing for a new hillside exception for the same proposal. The only differences are that the new application includes an on-site water water tank and a retaining wall to deal with erosion problems with the driveway. DISCUSSION: Site and architectural design: The site is accessed by a private driveway that crosses in front of a lot (parcel 2), which was part of the original two-lot subdivision. The two-story house is proposed on the front portion of the lot. The residence is stepped down the hillside. Terraces are located in front of the main floor, which also serve as retaining walls. Second story decks are also proposed on the front and left elevations. Visual impacts: The residence is proposed on a prominent ridgeline. When this application was initially reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee, they recommended that the residence be lowered to reduce the visual impact. The applicant lowered the height by ten feet. Story poles were installed with the revised design, and photographs show that just the ridge of the roof will be visible from nearby vantage points. The roof of the residence is red-brown. At the most recent review by the Environmental Review Committee, the Committee requested that the roof color be other than red to blend better into the envirorument. As shown on the material board, the roof tile is red-brown, and staff believes it is dark enough to blend into the hillside. The applicant was asked to contact adjacent neighbors again about the proposed residence. Mr. Yee did contact them by letter. Existing landscaping provides much of the screening for the proposed residence. As shown on the proposed landscaping plan, additional trees, including six 24" box oak trees, will be planted to provide additional screening. Geology/Grading: The City's consulting geologist reviewed the proposed development. He reported that the site is potentially constrained by steep slopes, the potential for landsliding, potentially expansive surficial soil and bedrock materials, soil creep, settlement and creep of artificial fill, and the susceptibility to strong seismic ground shaking. The City's consulting geologist's reviewed the building plans in July 2002. He recommended that a retaining wall be provided to support the driveway fill. As mentioned, the retaining wall is included in the proposed plans. The grading quantity, 3,425 cubic yards of cut plus fill, is high because the residence was lowered into the hillside, at the City's request. This is considered an acceptable trade-off because of the importance of reduced visibility. Second Story Decks: The closest front second story deck is approximately 40 feet from the property line. The house below is over 60 feet from the property line, and there are intervening existing oak trees, as well as new trees. The left side second story deck is approximately 20 feet from the side property line. New trees are proposed on the side property line, and will be part of the final landscaping plan. Staff believes that the privacy of the neighboring properties is adequately protected. Enclosures: Model resolution Initial Study Recommendation of Environmental Review Committee Plan Set Visual Analysis and Material Board Submitted by: Ciddy Wordell, City Plarmer Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development. G:pl~u~fl~g/pdrepor t/pc/pcEXC-2002-10 EXC-2002-10 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 MODEL RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A HILLSDE EXCEPTION TO BUILD A 4,538 SQUARE FOOT RESDENCE ON A PROMINENT RDGELINE AND ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 30%, TO GRADE MORE THAN 2,500 CUBIC YARDS AND TO CONSTRUCT SECOND STORY DECKS AT 11837 UPLAND WAY SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: EXC-2002-10 Chung Yeh 11837 Upland Way SECTION 1I: FINDINGS FOR EXCEPTION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a hillside exception, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the following with regard to this application: 1. The proposed development will not be injurious to property or improvements in the area nor be detrimental to the public health and safety. 2. The proposed development will not create a hazardous condition for pedestrian or vehicular traffic. 3. The proposed development has legal access to public streets and public services are available to serve the development. 4. The proposed development requires an exception which involves the least modification of, or deviation from, the development regulations prescribed in this chapter necessary to accomplish a reasonable use of the parcel. 5. All alternative locations for development on the parcel have been considered and have been found to create greater environmental impacts than the location of the proposed development. 6. The proposed development does not consist of structures on or near known geological or environmental hazards which have been determined by expert testimony to be unsafe or hazardous to structures or persons residing therein. (See General Plan Policy 2-49.) 7. The proposed development includes grading and drainage plans which will endure that erosion and scarring of the hillsides caused by necessary construction of roads, Resolution No. Page 2 EXC-2002-10 January 13, 2003 housing sites, and improvements will be minimized. (See General Plan Policies 2-53, 2-54 and 2-57.) 8. The proposed development does not consist of structures which would disrupt the natural silhouette of ridgelines as viewed from established vantage points on the valley floor unless either: a. The location of a structure on a ridgeline is necessary to avoid greater negative environmental impacts; or b. The structure could not otherwise be physically located on the parcel and the size of the structure is the minimum which is necessary to allow for a reasonable use of the parcel. (See General Plan Policies 2-46, 2-47 and 2-48.) 9. The proposed development consists of structures incorporating designs, colors, materials, and outdoor lighting which blend with the natural hillside environn~ent and which are designed in such a manner as to reduce the effective visible mass, including building height, as much as possible without creating other negative environmental impacts. (See General Plan Policies 2-46, 2-50, 2-51 and 2-52.) 10. The proposed development is located on the parcel as far as possible from punic open space preserves or parks (if visible therefrom), riparian corridors, and wildlife habitats unless such location will create other, more negative environmental impacts. (See General Plan Policies 2-55, 5-14 and 5-28.) 11. The proposed development includes a landscape plan which retains as many specimen trees as possible, which utilizes drought-tolerant native plants and ground covers consistent with nearby vegetation, and which minimizes lawn areas. (See General Plan Policies 2-54, 5-15 and 5-16.) 12. The proposed development confines solid fencing to the areas near a structure rather than around the entire site. ( See General Plan Policy 5-17.) 13. The proposed development is otherwise consistent with the City's General Plan and with the purposes of this chapter as described in Section 19.40.010. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, Application No. EXC-2002-10 is hereby recomrnended for approval; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application EXC-2002-10, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of January 13, 2003, are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on Sheets C.1, Nelsen Engineering Sheets 1 - 4, and Sheets A. 1-6 and L1 and the submitted material board except as may be amended by this resolution. Resolution No. Page 3 EXC-2002-10 January 13, 2003 NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions} pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINSTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I0. STREET WIDENING Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height pemfitted by the zone in which the site is located. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control Signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. .GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre and Post- development calculations must be provided to identify how much runoff will be directed to our storm drain facilities. Resolution No. Page 4 EXC-2002-10 January 13, 2003 11. 12. 13. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for undergrounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: 'a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Pe,mit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: g. Park Fees: $ 5% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $2,268.00 minimum $ 5% of Site Improvement Cost $1,000.00 $ 2,420/acre N/A N/A Bonds: a. b. C. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. ** Developer is required for one-year power cost for streetlights 14. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. Resolution No. Page 5 EXC-2002-10 January 13, 2003 15. 16. 17. DEDICATION OF WATER_LINES The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water for water service to the subject development. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or sediment control plan shall be provided. DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION The geologists shall submit a reevaluation for the driveway construction after completion of the residence construction activity. The City and the City's geologist must review and approve the evaluation prior to the release of improvement bonds. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 66474.18 of the California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. Of this resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices Ralph Qualls, Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 22046 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of January, 2003, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYE S: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Steve Piasecki Director ofCommunityDevelopment g : /planning/pdreport/res/EXC- 2 00 2- l O Charles Corr, Chairperson Cupertino Planning Commission CUPEI TINO City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3251 FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Project Title: The Chun,q Yeh residence Project Location: 11837 Upland Way, Cupertino [staff Use Only lEA File No. EA-2002-25 jCase File No. EXC-2002-10 ~Attachments Project Description: New 4,533 sin.qle family residence on a hillside lost Environmental Setting: Vacant hillside lot PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Area (ac.) - _1.55 Building Coverage - 6.2% Exist. Building - 4,533 s.f. Zone -RHS G.P. Designation --_% acre slope density Assessor's Parcel No. - 366-03-061 If Residential, Units/Gross Acre - Unit Type #1 Unit Type #2 Unit Type #3 Unit Type #4 Unit Type #5 Total# Rental/Own Bdrms Total s.f. Price 1 own 4355 s.f. Proposed Bldg. Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check) [] Monta Vista Design Guidelines [] [] N. De Anza Conceptual [] [] Heart of the City Specific Plan [] - S. De Anza Conceptual S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & Landscape If Non-Residential, Building Area - s.f. Employees/Shift -__.Parking Required Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area - FAR - Max. Parking Provided YES x NO A. CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN SOURCES 1. Land Use Etement 2. Public Safety Element 3. Housing Element 4. Transportation Element 5. Environmental Resources 6. Appendix A- Hillside Development 7. Land Use Map 8. Noise Element Amendment 9. City Ridgeline Policy 10. Constraint Maps CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS 11. Tree Preservation ordinance 778 12. City Aerial Photography Maps 13. "Cupertino Chronicle" (California History Center, 1976) 14. Geologica! Report (site specific) 15. Parking Ordinance 1277 16. Zoning Map 17. Zoning Code/Specific Plan Documents 18. City Noise Ordinance CITY AGENCIES Site 19. Community Development Dept. List 20. Public Works Dept. 21. Parks & Recreation Department 22. Cupedino Water Utility OUTSIDE AGENCIES 23. County Planning Department 24. Adjacent Cities' Planning Departments 25. County Departmental of Environmental Health OUTSIDE AGENCIES (Continued) 26. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 27. County Parks and Recreation Department 28. Cupertino Sanitary District 29. Fremont Union High School District 30. Cupertino Union School District 31. Pacific Gas and Electric 32. Santa Clara County Fire Department 33. County Sheriff 34. CALTRANS 35. County Transportation Agency 36. Santa Clara Valley Water Distdct OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS 37. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant Excesses 38. FEMA Flood Maps/SCVWD Flood Maps 39. USDA, "Soils of Santa Clara County" 40. County Hazardous Waste Management Plan 41. County Heritage Resources Inventory 42. Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel Leak Site 43. CalEPA Hazardous Waste and Substances Site OTHER SOURCES 44. Project Plan Set/Application Materials 45. Field Reconnaissance 46. Experience w/project of similar scope/characteristics 47. ABAG Projection Series A. Complete al_JI information requested on the Initial Study Cover page. LEAVE BLANK SPACES ONLY WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLICABLE. B. Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete, the checklist information in Categories A through O. C. ' You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s) in the "Source" column next to the question to which they relate. D. If you check any of the "YES" response to any questions, you must attach a sheet explaining the potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed. E. When explaining any yes response, label your answer clearly (Example "N - 3 Historical") Please try to respond concisely, and place as many explanatory responses as possible on each paqe. F. Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the Preparer's Affidavit. C. Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City. ,/Project Plan Set of Legislative Document -"Location map with site clearly marked (when applicable) EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a [] scenic vista? [5,9,24,41,44] b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? [5;9,11,24,34,41,44] c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? [1,17,19,44] O d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? [1,16,44] [] [] [] [] The lot conforms to zoning and the General Plan land use. Surrounding uses are hillside residential. II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? [5,7,39] b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? [5,7,23] c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] Farmland, to non-agricultural use? [5,7,39] There are no agricultural uses on this property III. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria established by the ' applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? [5,37,42,44] b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? [5,37,42,44] c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? [4,37,44] d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? [4,37,44] e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? [4,37,44] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] A single family residence does not create an of these effects. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either [] [] · [] [] directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] US Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? [20,36,44] d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? [5,10,12,21,26] e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? [11,rl2,41] f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? [5,10,26,27] [] [] [] [] [] [] None of these resources is affected. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES --Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in [] [] [] the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.57 [5,13,41] b) Cause a substantial adverse change in [] [] [] the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? [5,13,41] [] [] [] c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique )aleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? [5,13,41] d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? [1,5] None of these resources is affected. [] [] [] VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: [] [] [] [] i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. [2,14,44] ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? [] [] [] [] [2,5,10,44] iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including [] [] [] [] liquefaction? [2,5,10,39,44] iv) Landslides? [2,5,10,39,44] [] [] [] [] b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the [] [] [] [] loss of topsoil? [2,5,10,44] [] [] [] [] c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? [2,5,10,39] d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property? [2,5,10] e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? [6,9,36,39] This lot has steep slopes and, potential for landsliding, and soils creep according to geological reports (Purcell, Rhoades & Associates, Cotton, Shires & Associates). Mitigation measures consist of those recommended by t~hese geotechni~al studies. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or [] [] [] [] ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? [32,40,42,43=44] b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? [32,40,42,43,44] c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? [2,29,30,40,44] d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? [2,42,40,43] e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [2,32,33,44] h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?[1,2,44] None of imBacts is applicable. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ..'_' ..W__°__u I_d_t_h_h e__P r °J e ct~'' ................... ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? [20,36,37] b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? [20,36,42] e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or )lanned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? [20,36,42] f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? [20,36,37] g) Place housing within a 100-year flood ~azard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? [2,38] h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? [2,38] i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? [2,36,38] j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? [2,36,38] None of these impacts is applicable. [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established [] [] community? [7,12,22,41] b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [1,7,8,16,17,18,44] c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? [1,5,6,9,26] None of these impacts is applicable. X. MINERAL RESOURCES .- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known [] [] [] [] mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? [5,10] b) Result in the loss of availability of a [] [] [] [] locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? [5,10] This is not a mineral resource area. Xl. NOISE -- Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? [8,18,44] b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? [8,18,44] c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [8,18] d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [8,18,44] e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the )roject area to excessive noise levels? [8,18,44] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private [] [] airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [8,18] None of these impacts is applicable. Xll. POPULATION AND HOUSING --Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? [3,16,47,44] b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] A single family residence does not create these effects. XlII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the :rovision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or ~hysically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? [19,32,44] [] [] Police protection? [33,44] [] Schools? [29,30,44] [] [] Parks? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] [] [] 10 [] [] [] [] ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] Other public facilities? [19,20,44] A single family residence does not create these effects. XlV. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? [5,44] [] , [] [] [] [] [] [] A single family residence does not create thes~ XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? [4,20,35,44] b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? [4,20,44] c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? [4] d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [20,35,44] e) Result in inadequate emergency access? [2,19,32,33,44] f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? effects. 11 ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] [17,44] g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [4,34] A single family residence does not create these effects. XVl. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment [] requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? [5,22,28,36,44] b) Require or result in the construction of [] new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [36,22,28,36] c) Require or result in the construction of [] new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [5,22,28,36,44] e) Result in a determination by the [] wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? [5,22,28,36,44] f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? [?] g) Comply with federal, state, and local [] statutes and regulations related to solid waste? [?] I _A._s_i_ngJA. f_a.~_i~!y~resid_~e_n_c_~e does not crea~t~e~thes~e eff~ects. _ ...................................................... i 12 ~.~ ,., ~o:De completed by City Sta~ a) Does the project have the potential to [] [] [] degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife t population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? [] b) Does the project have impacts that are [] [] [] individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental I effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental [] [] [] effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? [] REPARER~S AFFIDAVIT I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appropriate source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. 1 hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of such delay or discontinuance. Preparer's Signature Print Preparer's Name G:\Planning\MISCELL\Template\lnitial Study Checklist.doc 13 by City Staff) ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [] Aesthetics [] Agriculture Resources [] Air Quality [] Biological Resources [] Cultural Resources [] Geology/Soils [] Hazards & Hazardous [] Hydrology / Water [] Land Use / Planning Materials Quality [] Mineral Resources [] Noise [] Population / Housing [] Public Services [] Recreation [] Transportation/Traffic [] Utilities / Service [] Mandatory Findings of Systems Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds that: [] The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there Will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [] The proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [] Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. E F~C-C_,.ba~pe rs o n ( Date Date 14 CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE December 11, 2002 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on December 11, 2002. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application No.: Applicant: Location: EXC-2002-10 (EA-2002-25) Ron Dick (Yeh Residence) 11837 Upland Way DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST Hillside Exception to build a 4,538 square foot residence on a prominent ridgeline on slopes greater than 30%, to grade more than 2,500 cubic yards and to construct second story decks. FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and has no sign~nv~al impacts. Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development g/erc/REC EA-2002-25 c ~ .c: - _~ ?hot~ For' ,On upland Way Append~ g_ Prommant tMgelmas- City. Of Cupertino- CITY OF CUPEP INO City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 Community Development Department Housing Services Summary Agenda Item No. ~ C~ Agenda Date: March 3, 2003 Subject: Review of proposed housing assistance program for Cupertino teachers. Recommendation: Direct Cupertino Housing Commission to recommendations to the City Council. evaluate proposed program and make Background: At the January 2003 goal setting session, City Council members expressed interest in developing a teacher-housing program to serve Cupertino teachers. The Cupertino Housing Commission began exploring options early in 2002 with two teacher union representatives and by researching existing programs in neighboring cities. The Commission was very interested in beginning a program. However, lack of adequate funding prohibited the Commission from making any recommendations. Discussion: Funding Sources: The two possible funding sources for a teacher-housing program are the redevelopment housing set-aside fund and the Below-Market Rate (BMR) Program in-lieu fees. The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program can not be used to help fund this program, because the income levels of teachers typically falls into the median and moderate income category. By Federal regulation, the CDBG program can only be used to serve Iow and very-low income households. The redevelopment housing set-aside has accumulated less than $10,000 since its inception, and therefore cannot be relied upon to fund more expensive housing programs at this time. Five to seven years in the future, this source should be able to provide significant amounts of funding for affordable housing programs. However, it may be used to help fund the consultant services portion of the program described later in this report. The remaining source of funding is the BMR in-lieu fees. Currently, the balance of the fund not reserved for the Cupertino Community Services Vista Village development is $292,428. Of Review of proposed teacher housing assistance program. March 3, 2003 Page 2 this amount, approximately $45,000 will be used to cover staffing expenses and for Cupertino. Community Services' Affordable Placement Program. To avoid depleting this fund staff recommends that $210,000 is devoted the teacher housing assistance program. This should result in approximately four loans during the first year of the program and will leave about $40,000 that can be used for one additional year of CCS Affordable Housing Placement Program. Proposed Loan Terms: The terms of the loan will be similar to the San Jose Teacher Program, which has been reviewed by the Cupertino Housing Commission and found to be preferred over other existing teacher programs. The program is easy to administer and easy for the borrower to understand. The following is a list of the proposed loan terms: · Maximum loan amount of $50,000 (the San Jose program provides $40,000). · Zero percent loan deferred for 30 years or until transfer of property title. · Home must be borrower's principle residence for the term of the loan. · Resale restriction will be recorded against the property. Term of resale restriction to be determined. · Borrower can resell within the period covered by the resale restriction to a qualifying teacher; or · Resell the unit at market value within the period covered by the resale restriction and pay the City of Cupertino an equity share. Equity share percentage to be determined. · Homes must be purchased within the city of Cupertino limits or within a 1-mile radius of the city of Cupertino. The one mile radius to be clearly defined by staff and the Housing Commission. · Teachers must be employed in the Cupertino Union School District (CUSD), Fremont Union High School District (FUHSD) and the Foothill-DeAnza College District (FDCD). · Teacher is defined as a credentialed full-time teacher employed by CUSD, FUHSD and FDCD School District Participation: Staff and the Cupertino Housing Commission propose that the city fund a non-profit agency to work with the participating school districts to provide outreach to inform teacher s about the program and assist the teachers throughout the purchase process. This agency would also administer the loan program by developing the loan documents and funding the loans. Early estimates for the cost of this contract equal about $20,000, which would be funded by the City. Cupertino Housing Commission Review: Staff is recommending that this program be referred to the Cupertino Housing Commission for its review and to the three school districts to gain their input regarding the outreach effort. This item will be scheduled for review at a special meeting of the Cupertino Housing GSPlanning\SteveP\Teacher Housing cc3.03.03.doc Review of proposed teacher housing assistance program. March 3, 2003 Page 3 Commission in March 2003. The City Council should provide some feedback on the loan terms and the structure of the program in order to assist the Commission with its review. Prepared by: Vera Gil, Senior Planner Ste~e Piasecki, Director of Community Development APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL: David W. Knapp, City Manager Attachments: San Jose Homebuyer Program for Public School Teachers brochure HTSCC loan program brochure GSPlanning\SteveP\Teacher Housing cc3.03.03.doc San Jose Department of Housing - Programs - Teacher Homebuyer Program Page 1 of 4 Teacher Homebuyer Program Teacher Homebuyer Program HOUSING PROGRAM STAFF WELCOMES YOU Dear San ]os~ Public School Teacher: Thank you for your interest in the Teacher Home Buyer Program for San Joss public school program is designed for credentialed and emergency credentialed full time teachers who re; through 12 in San JosS. The City will provide a deferred payment loan of up to $40,000 to assist in purchase of a hc You finance the rest of the purchase price from a private lender and other sources. Please complete the app!ic8tion fprm and be sure to include all !Tsquired dgcuments. Give tt loan application to your lender. We will be happy to assist you in any way possible. If you have questions concerning the pr assistance in completing the application, please call Korey Richardson at 408-277-8486 (korey.richardson@ci.sj.ca.us) or Tom Cook at 408-277-2266 (tom.cook@ci.sj.ca.us). WHAT THE CITY PROGRAM OFFERS Deferred payment loan assistance for up to a maximum of $40,000. A private lender can fir remainder of the purchase price. BORROWER ELIGIBILITY QUESTIONS~ PROCEDURES~ & FI~ TERMS 1. Who qualifies for the program? A classroom teacher who: O Is employed full-time at a public, K-12 school that is either located within tt ]os~ municipal boundaries or other public schools where the majority of stu, San Jos~ residents. (Contact the Housing DepaKrment for a current list of el O Holds one of the following California teaching credentials: http ://wwwv.sj housing.org/progranffthp.html 02/26/03 San Jose Department of Housing - Programs - Teacher Homebuyer Program Page 2 of 4 Cleared Credential in one of the following categories: a 0 Whose Household Size 1 2 3 4 Single Services NuJtiple Subject Severely Handicapped Learning Handicapped Clinical RehabJJitative Services Physically Handicapped Standard Elementary General Elementary Standard Secondary General Secondary Education Specialist (e.g. Deaf, Visually Impaired) household's gross income does not exceed these limits: Maximum Qualifying ~rncome $ 80,650 $ 92,150 $ 103,700 $115,200 O The teacher, other household member(s), and any other co-borrowers musl histories acceptable to the mortgage lender. Is the Program open to other professionals who may hold a teaching credential but K-12 teachers (e.g. school nurses, counselors)? No. Only teachers meeting the above criteria are eligible for this City Program. 3. Where does the home I buy have to be located? It must be located within the City of San los~ municipal boundaries. It cannot be Io. "county pocket" even if the property has a San lose address. 4. What type of home can I buy? Single family detached homes, town homes, and condominiums. Nobile homes may on an exception basis, subject to availability of special funds set aside for mobile hc 5. What is the maximum allowable home purchase price? There is no fixed maximum allowable home purchase price. However, the monthly cannot exceed an "Affordable Housing Cost Limit," as required by state law. The eft to restrict the home purchase price. 6. What is the Affordable Housing Cost Limit? Total monthly expenses for property taxes, insurance, homeowner association dues and interest payments, utilities (other than phone) and maintenance and repair cur exceed these limits, if your household is moderate income (earning 77+-% to 120°/ Income), the Affordable Housing Cost limits are: Studio $2,156 1 Bedroom $2,464 2 Bedroom $2,772 3 Bedroom $3,080 4 Bedroom $3,327 Note: Lower limits apply if your household income is less than 77+-% of median. 7. How much of my own money will be needed to buy the home? To close, you will usually need funds of up to 3% of the purchase price. Zero-perce~ programs are acceptable if approved by the senior lender. You can make an additi¢ downpayment to reduce your monthly payments or increase the amount of home tt http://www.sjhousing.org/program/thp.html 02/26/03 (~,_ ~" San Jose Department of Housing - Programs ~ Teacher Homebuyer Program Page 3 of 4 afford. It is acceptable for the seller to pay closing costs if the seller is willing to do ~ Note; Many first mortg.ag.e lenders will reqcre y,o~u~ to contribute atleast 3% of the/ City of San Jose - uepartm~t~ Home I Department I ~FOgJtO~g~q~itlyl~6RJ~i ~ ~l~l~l~Services I Data ] Reports I Publicatior <City of San Jose> <Web Page Disability Access Design Standard> The maximum City loan amount is $40,000. The Housing Department may approve if the teacher has excessive liquid assets available after the close of escrow. 9. What are the City loan repayment terms? The City loan is at zero percent. It is not due and payable until transfer of title to th years. 10. What happens when I want to resell the home before 45-year affordability term eno You are subject to a 4S-year affordability restriction that is recorded against the pre want to resell before this term is up, you must first notify the Housing Department. resale choices. O Resell to someone who has a household income that the City reviews and v, than 120% of median. The resale price is restricted because it is based upa Housing Cost Limit. You must repay the City loan but are not required to pa equity share of any increase in value. The new buyer cannot assume the Ci! O Resell the unit at market, repay the City loan and pay the City an "equity si share is the City's proportionate share of the difference between the origina and the resale price (less City approved selling costs and improvements). Note: An equity share must be paid if you prepay the City loan while continuing to r 11. How does the equity share provision work? You pay the City's proportionate share of the difference between the original gurch~ resale price (less City approved selling costs and improvements). Here is an examp Possible resale price $300,000 Original sales price _240,000 Accrued equity 60,000 Less reasonable capital improvements approved by City 2,000 Less reselling costs 21,00~ Equity subject to sharing 37,000 City's share {16.67% of original purchase price-- $40,000 loan) 6,168 Teacher-Homebuyer share (83.33% of purchase price) 30,832 12. To help buy my home, may I combine the City's Program with other assistance? Yes. For example, you can increase your home purchasing power by combining a T} other programs. The Housing Department or your lender can discuss these prograrr options with you. 13. I will need to borrow $300,000 from a private lender to buy my home. What is the ~ monthly payment? An estimated $1,900 assuming a 30 year loan at 6.5.0% interest (approximate Aug The interest rate and monthly payment will vary, depending upon money market cc credit and the loan program you select. Remember that the private lender will add I homeowners' association dues, and insurance to this figure and look at your other c determine how large a loan you can qualify for. 14. Can I refinance the non-City loans? http://www.sjhousing.org/program/thp.html 02/26/03 San Jose Department of Housing - Programs ~ Teacher Homebuyer Program Page 4 of 4 Yes~ it tl~e Mousing Department gives a0vance approval. I Be amount retmance0 car outstanding amount of such loans plus reasonable and necessary loan costs. 15. What lender can I use? You may use any J~!)der that has been pre-approved by the Housing Department. :!.6. I want to make an offer on a home. How rapidly can I receive the City funds to pay City loan approval normally will be five working days; funding can occur within 3.5 d your meeting our standard loan conditions and our receiving the loan commitment loan package from your first mortgage lender. Be sure to note the "pending approw any offer that you may make to protect you from loss of a deposit on an offer. 17. ! already own a home. Can the program help me buy another home? 18. No, if you are currently living in it as your principal residence. The City no longer re not have owned a home as a principal residence within three years of City loan dos If I am no longer teaching at a San .]os~ public school during the City loan term, do the loan? No. The City loan only needs to be repaid in 30 years or upon transfer of title to the 19. The program sounds great! What are the next steps? O Sign up and complete the required free first-time homebuyer education clas encourage you to contact Neighborhood Housing Services Silicon Valley (40 x226. Consumer Credit Counseling Service (408-988-7881), your real estat mortgage lender are also resources. Be prepared Lo provide the City and yo of your certificate of completion. o Contact a lender from the Housing Department _app)~gv~_e~.!!.s.~..~.qd.._c..gj~n~!ete i O Work with the real estate agent of your choice to assist you in the search fo home. o Get final loan approvals from your lender and the Housing Department. O Sign the loan documents. 0 Hove in and enio¥ vour new home/ http ://www.sjhousing.org/program/thp.html 02/26/03 Superflex 1 Page 1 of 2 Housing Trust Superflex Loan Now Available Through the Following Participating Direct Lenders New Income Limit: $115,200 Company Name II Phone II Contact I[ Email Cedar Mortgage 11(408) 879-9011 x115 jackn~cedannortgage.comtI Community West Mortgage North American Mortgage First Financial Company H(408) 361-0410 t1(925) 825-9100 11(408) 296-8288 IIJack Nogosek I[NA Ilaohn Hanson IIJohnCWM~Flash.net IIEdie Blackburn I IlTerri Ha Ilrerima@ffcl°ans-c°m I Homebuyers may select any Participating Broker in the Closing Cost Program however that Broker MUST submit the loan to one of the above Direct Lenders/Bankers. General Descriptiou The HTSCC Superflex Loan is a Deferred Second Loan up to 6% of the Purchase Price. Half of the loan (3%) will be used to lower the homebuyer's Mortgage Insurance and the remaining half can be: 1. Used to permanently buy down the homebuyer's interest rate, 2. Applied to Closing Costs, 3. Applied as a DoWn Payment, or Any combination of the above. To be eligible the homebuyer must:: 1. Not have owned a home in Santa Clara County within a year from date of application, 2. Have a gross annual income that does not exceed: $115,200, and 3. Purchase a home costing no more than $475,000 Note: There is a $200.00 non-refundable application fee payable to the "HTSCC". Repayment Terms: The HTSCC Superflex Loan, is a 3% simple interest, non-accruing loan and is payable upon the sale of the property, the refinance, or maturity of the first loan which ever occurs first. Prepayment Penalty: If the borrower has a prepayment penalty loan, this prepayment penalty will be due and payable in the event the borrower (s) make a payment that is more than 20% of their original principle balance in any 12-month period during the first five years after they obtain their First Loan. The amount of the prepayment penalty is equal to six months of interest. http://www.mccprogram.com/housing_trust/superflex.html 02/26/03 Superflex 1 Page 2 of 2 Down Payment required: 1% minimum from the homebuyer's own funds. Superflex Lender Notice of Rate <![endif]> Lender Notices of Rate RAI Lender Notice · Go Back · Top~.gfP. age. Superflex Data Sheet aka Application · MCC Home Page · Related Programs · Superflex I Loan Program Today's Date:02/26/03 You are visitor number 10580 http://www.mccprogram.c0m/housing_trust/superflex.html 02/26/03 ORDINANCE NO. 1912 DRAFT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AMENDING CHAPTER 2.40 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING THE DISASTER COUNCIL THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN that the following sections of the Cupertino Municipal Code shall be amended and added to read as follows: Section 2. 40. 020 is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.40.020 Definition As used in this chapter, "emergency" means the actual or threatened existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons, property and the environment within this City caused by, ~ucb ~^"~:*; ...... ;._~u..,;~ ~,~ n~ o, .... :~;~ .;~, ~.,~ ..... ~ ..... ether :ona. ditionz ~nck:ding, but not limited to, earthquakes, technological, natural and manmade disasters, including conditions resulting from war, but other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy, which conditions are or ~e likely to be, beyond the control of the se~ices, perso~el, equipment and facilities of this Ci~, requiring the combined forces of other political subdivisions to combat. (Ord 1697 (p~), 1995: Ord. 475 2, 1971) Section 2.40. 025 is hereby added' 2. 40. 25 Disaster Council / Citizen Corps Co uncil - Created Pursuant to California Government Code section 8610, there is created the Cupertino Disaster Council, which shall also function as the Cupertino Citizen Corps Council. Section 2. 40. 030 is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.40.30 Membership The Cupertino Disaster Council/Citizen Corps Council shall consist of al! members cf the C':ty Ccunci!. selected representatives of the City's Emergency Organization as defined in section 2.40. 070 of this chapter. The Mayor, or designee, shall serve as Chairperson and the Vice · ,,w~,~ ~ ....... ~o Emergency Services Coordinator, or designee, as Vice-Chairperson of the Disaster Council / Citizen Corps Council and shall make recommendations for representatives from the Emergency Ordinance No. 1912 2 Organization. (Ord. 1697 (part), 1995: Ord. 1475, 1988: Ord. 475 (s) 1, 1971: Ord. 475 1971) Section 2. 40. 040 is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.40.40 Powers and duties The Disaster Council / Citizen Corps Council has the duty and power to develop and recommend for adoption emergency plans and mutual aid agreements based on the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) as defined in the California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 2, Sections 2400-2450. The Disaster Council/Citizen Corps Council will provide guidance to develop disaster exercises and community action plans, support citizen participation, assist with threat assessments, identify local resources and facilitate multi-agency/inter-agency coordination within its membership and other local governments and special districts. The Disaster Council / Citizen Corps Council provides oversight for engaging citizens in homeland security, emergency planning and response and promoting community preparedness and family safety in three principal ways; through public education and outreach; through training opportunities; and, through volunteer programs that draw on special skills and interests. Citizen Corps programs overseen by the Disaster Council/Citizen Corps Council may include one or more of five program components administered by federal agencies: Community Emergency Response Team (CERT); Neighborhood IgZatch Program; Medical Reserve Corps (MRC); Volunteers in Police Service (VIPS); and Operation TIPS (Terrorist Information and Prevention System). These volunteer efforts will be integrated into a strategic, comprehensive approach that will more effectively utilize the time, talents and interests of volunteers in support of first responders and overall community preparedness. T, ,.~,~n ~ .....: ......~ ~:~, ,k~ ~,:.,:,:~ The Disaster Council/Citizen Corps Council shall provide for the registration of Disaster Service Workers (DSWs) within Cupertino and,is t!~us because of such registration, and~,n;~=-*;^-~,.~,,, act:,ng act as an instrumentality of the City in aid of the carrying out of the general governmental functions and policy of the City. It agrees to comply with the rules and regulations governing Disaster Service Workers (DSWs) as established by the California Emergency Council pursuant to the provisions of Section 8580 of the California Emergency Services Act. (Ord. 1697 (part), 1995: Ord. 475 4, 1971) Section 2. 40. 045 is hereby added: 2.40. 45 Office of Emergency Services - Created There is in the City an Office of Emergency Services which shall pro¥ide assistance to the Emergency Organization with its comprehensive emergency management program including Ordinance No. 1912 3 preparation, response, recovery and mitigation. The Emergency Services Coordinator shall act as advisor to the Emergency Organization during disasters. Section 2.40. 050 is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.40.50 Director of Emergency Services - gr-eated Designated q-~ .... ; ..... ~.~ ,~ c~cc.~ hr ~ ......... c .... ~ooo The City Manager is designated the Director of Emergency Services and f,:ISP~ '~,..~ .......... ...~--~-.~-~+ ~..~..n .... :~" in for the purposes of disaster management under the Standardized Emergency Management System. (Ord. 1697 (part), 1995: Ord. 475 5, 1971) Section 2.40. 070 is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.40.70 Emergency Organization - Membership. All officers and employees of this City, together with *~ ..... o Citizen Corps, Cupertino Amateur Radio Emergency Service (CARES) and other volunteer forces enrolled to aid them during an emergency, and all stakeholders, groups, organizations and persons who may by agreement or operation of law, including persons impressed into service under the provisions of Section 2.40.60 (G) (3) of this chapter, be charged with duties incident to the protection of life and property and the environment in this City during such emergency, shall constitute the emergency organization of the City. (Ord. 475 8, 1971) Section 2.40. 080 is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.40.080 Emergency Organization - Structure, duties and functions The City Emergency Organization functions under the Standardized Emergency Management System. Representatives of the Emergency Organization have specific duties and responsibilities to train, plan for and participate in the City's emergency management response, as assigned by the Director of Emergency Services. These responsibilities are outlined in the Cupertino Emergency Plan. The structure, duties and functions of the emergency organization and the order of emergency succession to the position of Director of Emergency Services, shall be adopted by resolution of the City Council. (Ord. 475 8, 1971) Ordinance No. 1912 4 The City Clerk shall cause the title of this ordinance to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City within 15 days after its adoption, in accordance with Government code § 36933, shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and her certification, together with proof of publication, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of the Council of this City. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after its passage. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the 18th day of February 2003 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the 3rd day of March 2003, by the following vote: Vote: Members of the City Council Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino Dg AFT ORDINANCE NO. 1913 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AMENDING SECTIONS 2.88.010 OF THE CITY'S ORDINANCE CODE MODIFYING THE COMPOSITION OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Amendment Section 2.88.010 of the City's ordinance code is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.88.010 Established - Composition A. The Audit Committee of the City is established. The Audit Committee shall consist of four or five members as follows: 1. Two City Councilmembers 3. A Minimum o/Two and a maximum of three at large members who are not officials or employees of the City nor cohabit with, as defined by law, nor are related by blood or marriage to, any member of the committee, the City Manager or the staff person or persons assigned to the committee. Section 2.88.020 of the City's ordinance code is hereby amended to read as follows: 2.88.020 At Large Member - Qualifications An Audit Committee at large member is not required to be a Cupertino resident. In selecting an at large member, the City Council shall give priority to individuals who have substantial accounting, audit, or investment experience, preferably in connection with a governmental agency. 2. Publication Clause The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City within 15 days after its adoption, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933, shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and her certification, together with proof of publication, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of the Council of this City. Ordinance No. 1913 Page 2 iNTRODUCED at a regular adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the 18th day of February 2003 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the 3rd day of March 2003, by the following vote: Vote: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: Members of the City Council ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor PC/DIR/O/OA THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE DISTRIBUTED AT THE MEETING J. VOLCKB4AINN & ASSOCIATES, INC. George B. Brewster, President Direct: (408) 996-7268 February 26, 2003 Steve Piasecki, AICP Director of Community Development City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Re: Draft Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan Dear Steve: Thank you for sending me the draft of the new Crossroads Area Streetscape Plan. Although I will make every effort to attend the commission and council hearings on the plan, I would like to take this opportunity to register my comments for the record. You and your staff should congratulated for the vision, thoroughness and hard work evidenced by the plan. If the plan's intent is implemented, it will transform the Crossroads Area for the better. As a property owner within the planning area (Stevens Creek Office Center, comprising seven acres of land fronting Stevens Creek Boulevard and 111,000 square feet of office and retail space) we are vitally interested in the outcome. The plan's intention of creating an attractive, pedestrian-scaled shopping district by encouraging high-quality development is laudable and we wholeheartedly support that intention. Including walkability, mixed-use, enlivened streetscape, and an improved jobs/housing balance will benefit all citizens. Having said that, I'd like to point out what seems to me to be some inconsistencies between the stated goals of the plan and its provisions. Since one of the stated goals is to encourage investment, I'd like to offer some observations on what does, and doesn't, encourage investment based on thirty years in the real estate investment and development business. For background, my development projects include multi-family residential, office, and mixed use projects, among which are the VISA headquarters in Foster City, the Benicia Marina waterfront mixed-use village, apartment and condo communities from 20 to 600 units, and several master-planned communities. I have been involved as a principal or advisor with over two billion dollars of acquisitions, investments and development. I've had my share of unsuccessful projects, and have learned lessons form every one. In addition to my business pursuits, I am an appointed member of the US Environmental Protection Agency federal advisory board and its Brownfield/Smart Growth task force. I have served as a member and committee chair of professional organizations including the Urban 20833 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite 102 * Cupertino, CA 95014 Phone: (408)252-7902 * Fax: (408)252-1233 Land Institute and the Congress for the New Urbanism. and as a member of the advisory boards of the California Environmental Remediation Fund, the Gateway Cities Partnership, and the Island Press Sprawl Advisory Board and as a panelist for several ULI advisory panels. I was the founding executive director of the California Center for Land Recycling, a non-profit created to encourage urban infill development, and in that capacity I have made presentations on infill development and its barriers to the Califomia State Assembly Environmental Safety and Toxics Committee, the Real Estate Roundtable, Haas Business school, the UCLA Annual Land Use Law and Planning Conference, the Great Valley Center, and the James Irvine Foundation. I am a contributing author of The Practice of Sustainable Development, and Our Land, Ourselves., and principal author of The Ecology of Development and Land Recycling and the Creation of Sustainable Communities. Hopefully, I've learned a few things about what works and what doesn't in real estate investment and the creation of workable communities. If I can drawn any conclusions from my experiences, they would include: 1. Encouraging private investment in real estate infrastructure requires both an economic incentive (will the project be profitable enough to justify the risk of time and money?) and a political incentive (does the local authority want to encourage this investment by reducing the time and risk involved in obtaining entitlements?). Without both factors being present, quality private investment will be slow or nonexistent. 2. Housing comes first and retail follows, as the population density becomes sufficient to support it. Making pedestrian-oriented retail development work is primarily dependent on creating enough population density within walking distance of the retail to support it. Numerous studies by the Congress for the New Urbanism point out that retail uses in newly developing areas must be subsidized by the developer for many years before the surrounding residential density will support any additional retail investment. My experience with the Benicia Marina project illustrated this point well--an old and charming Main Street retail area was failing because there was way too much retail space for the population that is within walking distance of it. 3. Density supports services as well as investment. The more density (whether measured in units per acre or people per square mile), the more services can be supplied by the private and public sectors. For example, it takes a certain population density to support a corner market or a Starbuck's; it takes a larger (and more dense) population base to support public transportation and schools. Stevens Creek Boulevard has developed since the 1950's as an automobile-oriented retail area, as you know. The buildings are widely spaced, setback a long way from the street, and are surrounded by a sea of parking. This is the classic suburban sprawl model of development that emerged after World War II. It works in the absence of surrounding residential density because cars effectively expand the trade area, allowing more retail to be supported than would survive in a more traditional neighborhood development. If the goal of the city of Cupertino is to transform the Crossroads area from an automobile dominated shopping district to a pedestrian- oriented shopping district, it needs to give careful consideration to increasing residential density with a half-mile radius of targeted areas for new retails development. Pedestrian-oriented shopping and dining will not make economic sense, and therefore private investment dollars will not be available for it, unless and until residential density in the surrounding neighborhoods is sufficient to support it. Without it, the pedestrian retail element of it will simply not pencil out. Requiring new retail development, without encouraging the density to support it, will not make 20833 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite 102 * Cupertino, CA 95014 Phone: (408)252-7902 * Fax: (408)252-1233 retail development happen. Instead, it will only discourage investment in new office and residential projects in the plan area. The inconsistencies I see in the plan relate to this residential density issue, including: 1. The plan prescribes setback lines, rather than build-to lines. If the goal is to create a streetscape, developers should be encouraged to build to the fa(;ade line and discouraged from setting back beyond it. Although the plan intends the former, the use of set-back rather than build-to lines seems inconsistent. 2. The plan establishes maximum densities rather than minimum densities. If the goal is to create retail, and retail requires residential density, the plan should encourage more density, not discourage it. I don't think anyone is seriously concerned that Cupertino will turn into another Manhattan if increased density is encouraged, but if density is discouraged Cupertino is at real risk for becoming another Los Angeles. I realize advocating density is politically unpopular and risky, but doing so is necessary for the long-term quality of life in Cupertino. That's what political leadership is all about. 3. The plan establishes maximum height limits that also discourage density. Density means restricting large lot and single-family development, while encouraging developers to use their creativity in creating livable communities through the use of buildings of varying heights. An arbitrary 45-foot height limit is antithetical to creative solutions to the density issue. The portion of our own Stevens Creek Office Center that was formerly the Good Earth restaurant is a case in point. With its frontage on Stevens Creek Boulevard, this site could be one of the first "missing teeth" to be developed in the planning area. To support retail on the ground floor of a new building on this site, additional residential density is needed within walking distance of it. Yet under the plan, both this site and surrounding areas are limited to a maximum density of 35 units per acre. The plan as proposed would allow a maximum of only 23 residential units to be built on this site. This isn't enough residential density to support a newsstand. By contrast, Post Properties, one of the most successful developers of mixed-use high-density projects with a New Urbanist approach, recently completed a project in Austin consisting of 245 units on a 2.9-acre site--a density of more than 84 units per acre in a series of two-, three-and four-story buildings that include retail and restaurant amenities. Mixed-use infill projects with densities exceeding 100 units per acre have become common in under-densified suburbs. An economically feasible mixed-use project such as this is not possible under the Crossroads plan as proposed, but seems to be what the plan would like to encourage. To conclude on a more general note, the plan as currently conceived is a bit like trying to hammer nails with a screwdriver--it may not be the right tool for the job. Or perhaps it would be more accurate to say that we are in agreement with its intentions, but feel it doesn't go far enough. If the goal really is to make the Crossroads area into a mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly environment, the City may want to consider scrapping its current planning and zoning ordinances and replacing them with one of several varieties of new codes that have been developed by New Urbanist practitioners such as Duany Plater-Zyberk. Many towns have successfully encouraged private investment in higher-density, mixed-use projects by replacing the outmoded codes that originated in the 1950's (and which encourage Iow-density sprawl) 20833 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite 102 * Cupertino, CA 95014 Phone: (408)252-7902 * Fax: (408)252-1233 with new ones that discourage sprawl by encouraging building forms, densities and placements without dictating the uses that those buildings are put to. If developers are encouraged to create flexible, multi-use buildings, private investment always follows. For example, a multi-use building could accommodate retail, residential and office uses at different times of the economic cycle, as market conditions change. Think of how much new housing could be created today in the millions of square feet of vacant office space if the market, rather than the zoning, determined the use of a building. The intention of the plan is laudable and I will support its intention. However, I would like to see the City adopt approaches to implementing these intentions that will have a higher likelihood of succeeding in achieving the goal of encouraging quality development in the Crossroads area. Sincerely, George B. Brewster CC: John Volckmann 20833 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite 102 * Cupertino, CA 95014 Phone: (408)252-7902 * Fax: (408)252-1233 F~b 28 03 03:31p p.2 February 28, 2003 Dear Councilmember, 14aving reviewed your staff's recommendations regarding the construction of your $20 million library CFEC concurs with their assessment that a Labor Compliance Program (LCP) should be used on this prOject. Using an LCP is an effective way to ~marantee that all contractors are abiding by laws and regulations effecting public works projects. An LCP is quite different from the wasteful, discriminatory alternative you had been asked to consider, that being a Project Labor Agreement (PLA). The Coalition for Fair Employment in Construction was created to oppose these types of unfair agreements and to stand up for open competition in thc industry. PLAs are nothing but implicit discrimination that will reduce bidders on your projects and increase their costs. The history of PLA failures is so well documented that the fhct they are even brought up for consideration anymore is puzzling. Oncc again, your staff recommendation to go with an LCP is by far the best way to go for the city and we look forward to our contractors having a chance to bid on this important project. Sincerely, Eric Christen Executive Director, CFEC Coalition for Fair Employment in Coastruction 3131 52nct Avenue, Sacramen~0, Calif0rnia 95823 Ph0ae 9161399-6205 Fax 9101426-413~ AND CON~RACTO~$,IN~ GOLDEN GATE CHAPTER February 28, 2003 Associated Builders and Contractors (~olden ~ate Chapter Cupertino City Council 10300 Torte Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Agenda Item #16---March 3, 2003 Dear Councilmember: The Golden Gate Chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors represents 400 member contractors in Northern California, including more than 40 contractors in the South Bay. We operate state-approved apprenticeship programs in the electrical, carpentry, painting, plumbing, and laborer trades. We support the staffrecommendation regarding Agenda Item #16, which deals with a report on Labor Compliance Provisions for Construction Contracts and approval of Revised Special Provisions for Certified Payrolls and Prevailing Wage Requirements for the Civic Center and Library Phase II Construction Project. Staff recommends that contractors and subcontractors working on the library submit certified payroll records for each pay period to the city to ensure that the contractors are complying with the law. This would be an appropriate way for the City of Cupertino to confirm that contractors are complying with all aspects of law regarding public works. In fact, California Labor Code Section 1771.5 already requires contractors and subcontractors on public works projects to maintain and furnish, at a designated time, a certified copy of each weekly payroll containing a statement of compliance signed under penalty of perjury. The awarding body has the authority to review, and, if approlxiate, audit payroll records to verify compliance with the labor code. More radical suggestions mentioned for the construction of the new library include a proposed Project Labor Agreement (PLA). PLAs are a highly controversial and unnecessary tactic with a consistent pattern of reducing competition and increasing costs. Associated Builders and Contractors is strongly opposed to PLAs. Sincerely, Goverament Affairs Director 11875 Dublin Boulevard, Suite C-258 ° Dublin, California 94568-2842 Tel (925) 829-9230 · Fax (925) 829-5743 · www. abc.org/gato g/~ 'd 768/_'0N [ad67:8 SOOg '8g'qe_~ EXIBITS BEGIN HERE School Site Council Presentation to the Cupertino City Council Brief Project History: · March 2, 2002 - SSC asks City Council how to change traffic procedures. · April 2 & 8, 2002- F aria hosts 2 neighborhood meetings. · June 3, 2002 - SSC asks City Council to allow 30 minute parking pilot project. · August 22, 2002- Pilot project begins. SSC proposed to turn bumper to bumper traffic into parked cars to lessen the overall congestion. SSC seeks to replace traffic congestion with a safer alternative... # of Cars Entering Faria Parking Lot Before and After 30 Min. Parking Project PM Pick Up Cars AM Drop' Off Cars 0 100 200 300 · # Reduction [] After Aug 21, 2002 · June, 2002 In conclusion, to better provide for the safety of the children and generate a more orderly traffic flow, please allow the 30- minute parking project to become a reality for all future classes of Faria elementary school students and their parents. Proposed Modification for Maximum Second Story Floor Area R1-5, R1-6, R1-7.5 zones (no change): Greater of: 600 sq. ft. 35% of first story floor area R1-10, R1-20 zones: Lesser of: 12% of lot area 70% of first story floor area EXHIBIT Jan Stoeckenius/Julia Tien MCA-2002-03, EA-2002-15 Cupertino City Council - 3 March 2003 Slide 1 Effects of the Change · Only affects R1-10/R1-20 zones Slightly increases maximum second story floor area: Current regulation: 11.67% of lot area Proposed modification: 12.00% of lot area Reduces house size required for given second story size: Example: 14,000 sq. ft. lot, 1600 sq. ft. second story Current regulation: 6172 sq. ft. (44% FAR) Proposed modification: 3886 sq. ft. (28% FAR, 37% reduction) · Removes the 600 sq. ft. allowance In practice, not applicable for R1-10/R1-20 Jan Stoeckenius/Julia Tien MCA-2002-03, EA-2002-15 Cupertino City Council - 3 March 2003 Slide 2 Why Make the Modification · Avoids unnecessary growth of first floor · Encourages smaller house footprint · Provides more design flexibility Alternate methods available to ensure privacy/compatibility Discretionary design review of all 2-story development per Section 19.28.060 (D) as amended by MCA-2002-03 Jan Stoeckenius/Julia Tien MCA-2002-03, EA-2002-15 Cupertino City Council - 3 March 2003 Slide 3 Why Focus on R1-10/R1-20 Larger lots, more options to hide visual bulk Smaller house footprint allows retention of mature trees More space for new plantings Second story effect on neighbors less significant More mitigation opportunities Greater space between houses · Often not built to FAR limit Especially for lots > 13,500 sq. ft. Minimal effect for smaller lots Most new development is to FAR limit Has no effect on R1-5 zone · We would support extension to other R1 zones · Full disclosure: we live in R1-10 zone Jan Stoeckenius/Julia Tien MCA-2002-03, EA-2002-15 Cupertino City Council - 3 March 2003 Slide 4 3-3 o~ March 3, 2003 Councilmember Sandoval Proposed Policy on Responsible Contracting EXHIBIT In order to protect the citizens of the City and assure that the City does business solely with truly responsible contractors who abide by all applicable laws and regulations. California law, as well as good business practices, mandates that public works projects be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. Typically, "responsible" is defined as contractors who are 1. Licensed properly; 2. Adequately bonded (insured); 3. Not barred from work based on past violations; 4. maintain a training/ apprenticeship program. In addition to these definitions, it is the policy of the City of Cupertino to further define Responsible bidders as those which: 1. Have no pending, outstanding or un-abated violations of prevailing wage statutes in any jurisdiction; 2. Have no pending, outstanding or un-abated violations of workplace safety violations; 3. Have no pending, outstanding or tm-abated violations of environmental laws or regulations; 4. Have a generally sound reputation among other local public agencies for whom they have completed contracts on schedule, on budget, and without unreasonable litigation. Califomia law mandates that prevailing wages be paid on public works projects. This policy assures a level playing field for all prospective bidders and provides the taxpayers an assurance that public works projects are done with competent contractors employing properly trained workers. It is the policy of the City of Cupertino to 1. Require affirmative acknowledgement of this policy by prospective bidders; 2. Require complete compliance with the relevant prevailing wage statutes; and 3. To provide a self-funding mechanism for the local enforcement of these laws. a. The project will be consistent with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan, any applicable specific plans, zoning ordinances and the purposes of this title. · b. The granting of the special permit will not result in a condition that is detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. c. The proposed addition/home is harmonious in scale and design with the general neighborhood. d. The proposed addition/home is generally consistent with design guidelines developed by the Director of Community Development. e. The proposed addition/home will not result in significant adverse visual impacts as viewed from adjoining properties. 19.28.100 Development Regulations - Eichler R-lc single-family residence "Eichler districts" protect a consistent architectural form through the establishment of district site development regulations. Regulations found in the other sections of this ordinance shall apply to properties zonsd R, le? In the event of a conflict between other regulations in this chapter and this sectior~, this section shall prevail, Nothing in these regulations is intended to preclude a harmonious two.story home or second story-addition. A. Setback -First Story. 1. The minimum front yard setback is twenty feet. B. Building Design Requirements. I. Entry features facin~ the street shall be irrtegrated with the roof line of the house. 2. The maximum roof slope shall be 3:12 (~d~ over run). 3. Wood or other siding material located on w~fl!s facing a public street (not including the garage door) shall incorporate vertical ~ves, up to six inches apart. 4. The building design shall incorporate stt~ht architectural lines, rather than curved lines. 5. Second story building wall offsets described, in sec?on 19.28.060 DSb are not required for homes in.the Rl-e zone. 6. The first floor shall be no more than 12 inches above the existing grade. %. Privacy Protection Requirements. ' ....... 1. Side & Rear Yard Facing Second Floor Windows In addition to other privacy protection requirements in Chapter 19.28.060(F), the following is required for all second story windows: a. Cover windows with exterior louvers to a height of six feet above the second floor, or b. Obscure glass to a height of six feet above tbe second floor, or c. Have a window s'~'nimum above the second floor. 19.28.110 Procedure for Exceptions and R~idential Design Approvals A. Application and Fee. All applications for approvals described in section 19.28.80 and 19.28.90 shall be made in writing on a form prescribed by the Director of community Development. A fee as prescribed by City Council resolution shall accompany the application. B. Public Hearing -Notice. Upon receipt ofen application for approval, the Director of Community Development shall set a time and place for a public hearing before the relevant ? 10 ASSOCIATED BUI&DER$ AND CONTRACTORS, iNC, GOLDEN CATE CHARTER February 28, 2003 Associated Builders and Contractors Golden Gate Chat ter Cupertino City Council 10300 Torte Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Agenda Item #16--March 3, 2003 Dear Councilmember: The Golden Gate Chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors represents 400 member contractors in Northern California, including more than 40 contractors in the South Bay. We operate state-approved apprenticeship programs in the electrical, carpentry, painting, plumbing, and laborer trades. We support the staff recommendation regarding Agenda Item #16, which deals with a report on Labor Compliance Provisions for Construction Contracts and approval of Revised Special Provisions for Certified Payrolls and Prevailing Wage Requirements for the Civic Center and Library Phase II Construction Project. Staff recommends that contractors and subcontractors working on the library submit certified payroll records for each pay period to the city to ensure that the contractors are complying with the law. This would be an appropriate way for the City of Cupertino to confirm that contractors are complying with all aspects of law regarding public works. In fact, California Labor Code Section 1771.5 already requires contractors and subcontractors on public works projects to maintain and furnish, at a designated time, a certified copy of each weekly payroll containing a statement of compliance signed under penalty of perjury. The awarding body has the authority to review, and, if appropriate, audit payroll records to verify compliance with the labor code. More radical suggestions mentioned for the construction of the new library include a proposed Project Labor Agreement (PLA). PLAs are a highly controversial and unnecessary tactic with a consistent pattern of reducing competition and increasing costs. Associated Builders and Contractors is strongly opposed to PLAs. ?ncerely, Government Affairs Director 11875 Dublin Boulevard, Suite C-258 * Dublin, California 94568-2842 Tel {9251 829-9230 · Fax (925} 829-5743 ° www. abc.org/gato ;/8 'd 'r68L'ON ~d6'~:8 800S 's8'qa3 retail development happen. Instead, it will only discourage investment in new office and residential projects in the ptan area. The inconsistencies I see in the plan relate to this residential density issue, including: 1. The plan prescribes setback lines, rather than build-to lines. If the goal is to create a streetscape, developers should be encouraged to build to the fa~;ade line and discouraged from setting back beyond it. Although the plan intends the former, the use of set-back rather than build-to lines seems inconsistent. 2. The plan establishes maximum densities rather than minimum densities. If the goal is to create retail, and retail requires residential density, the plan should encourage more density, not discourage it. I don't think anyone is seriously concerned that Cupertino will turn into another Manhattan if increased density is encouraged, but if density is discouraged Cupertino is at real risk for becoming another Los Angeles. I realize advocating density is politically unpopular and risky, but doing so is necessary for the long-term quality of life in Cupertino. That's what political leadership is all about. 3. The plan establishes maximum height limits that also discourage density. Density means restricting large lot and single-family development, while encouraging developers to use their creativity in creating livable communities through the use of buildings of varying heights. An arbitrary 45-foot height limit is antithetical to creative solutions to the density issue. The portion of our own Stevens Creek Office Center that was formerly the Good Earth restaurant is a case in point. With its frontage on Stevens Creek Boulevard, this site could be one of the first "missing teeth" to be developed in the planning area. To support retail on the ground floor of a new building on this site, additional residential density is needed within walking distance of it. Yet under the plan, both this site and surrounding areas are limited to a maximum density of 35 units per acre. The plan as proposed would allow a maximum of only 23 residential units to be built on this site. This isn't enough residential density to support a newsstand. By contrast, Post Properties, one of the most successful developers of mixed-use high-density projects with a New Urbanist approach, recently completed a project in Austin consisting of 245 units on a 2.9-acre site--a density of more than 84 units per acre in a series of two-, three-and four-story buildings that include retail and restaurant amenities. Mixed-use infill projects with densities exceeding 100 units per acre have become common in under-densified suburbs. An economically feasible mixed-use project such as this is not possible under the Crossroads plan as proposed, but seems to be what the plan would like to encourage. To conclude on a more general note, the plan as currently conceived is a bit like trying to hammer nails with a screwdriver--it may not be the right tool for the job. Or perhaps it would be more accurate to say that we are in agreement with its intentions, but feel it doesn't go far enough. If the goal really is to make the Crossroads area into a mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly environment, the City may want to consider scrapping its current planning and zoning ordinances and replacing them with one of several varieties of new codes that have been developed by New Urbanist practitioners such as Duany Plater-Zyberk. Many towns have successfully encouraged private investment in higher-density, mixed-use projects by replacing the outmoded codes that originated in the 1950's (and which encourage Iow-density sprawl) 20833 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite 102 * Cupertino, CA 95014 Phone: (408)252-7902 * Fax: (408)252-1233 Feb 28 03 03:31p February 28, 2003 Dear Councdmember, Having reviewed your staWs recommendations regarding the construction of your $20 million library CFEC concurs with their assessment that a Labor Compliance Program (LCP) should be used on this project. Using an LCP is an effective way to guarantee that all contractors are abiding by laws and regulations effecting public works projects~ An LCP is quite different from the wasteful, discriminatory alternative you had been asked to consider, that being a Project Labor A~'eement (PLA). The Coalition for Fair Employment in Construction was created to oppose these types of unfair agreements and to stand up for open competition in thc industry. PLAs are nothing but implicit discrimination that will reduce bidders on your projects and increase their costs. The histo~ of PLA failures is so well documented that the fact they are even brought up for consideration anymore is puzzling. Oncc again, your staffrecommendation to go with an LCP is by far the best way to go for the city and we look forward to our contractors having a chance to bid on this important project. Sincerely, Eric Christen Executive Director, CFEC Coalition for Fair Employment in Construction 3131 52nd Avenue, Sacrament;o, California 95823 Phone 916/399-6205 Fax 916142b-4136 William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3 te parkin z°ue in t"c s'reet ad"acent t° FEx H lB 1T [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: - ~1. School children's safety. . ~"2~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. EJ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~ dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 1-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~. I/W~'/I/W: will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: -~.~'X~FA~ --~C~V" · v - Your children's classroom #s: ~)__,~ Please return this form to y~ teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers l/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: "~1. School children's safety. I-12. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. )~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. /[~/YES [~ NO (Check one) / ~ If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Please return this form ~your child's Children's name s .~'?'~/~/Z~//~ Your children s classroom #s: teacher by Frida% November 22~ 2002.  · plus School William Faria Academics Cupertino Union School District November 1 $, 2002 , . a s~ We are half way t~rougn._ct as a great succeSS· In pr ? ,a ..in,ire ~arking zone, we Congratulat.on ·., ~cSC~ rates our p~tot p.r~ojc .... ermanent status for the City Council meeting m .... continued good faith in working cooperauvely w~th our neighbors, the To demonstrate Faria's tly completes your support, t f 1. l/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cuperti ~ t 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES ~ NO (Check one) . : [~ 1. School children' s safe_ty~'~o.;on at arrival and dismissal times at Far.re. . ~ 2. Less overall traffic cong ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to entel or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times· are not hindered by traffic congestion· ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles [~5. Other (fill in):_ by the Cupertino City Council on the requested parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth when either droppmg off or p~cking up my child/children ~rom Faria. 30-minute . ' ' ifanswema ~ ~' -- ' 's enter or leave their driveways. '~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a nexghbor driveway- ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Please list any concerns or comments you · this letter: ~ Name of Faria parent or guardzan completing Children's names:_ please print: [~~~~~ Your children's classroom #s:_~ · nature; Slg -~-'~~h~is form to your child, s teacher bY Frida N°vember 22 2002' please r~tu, ~ ..... A William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, preparation for an upcoming Cupertino Congratulations! We are half way through om 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers ................................................. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 1. 30-minute parking zone in the streets adiacent to Faria. [ Es E3 o (check one) . ': If answered YES lease check below all the ~rn ortant reasons ou aee with 1. School children's safety... _ ival ~nd dismissal times at Far}a. . · __ 3 Les overall traffic congesuon at ~a~r.} ~,~'~'~r ave their home during arnvm He~s Faria' s neighbors who need tu ~,, ..... le . · · times. ' b t fficcongest~on. - .-., dismissal ...... ,, vehicles are n°t h. 1,n, der, e,d ?.2/~ ~'4. Helpsensureem~,~"~ ,~1. I~cc ? ~dfi~_.~t "-~- ~-1~_ ~ ~ ~_.4,.,od hltl~c-ov~w ~' ' 0¢ 1,0c,~4/I ea~r~, .... ~_ Ito.v~-. . ~ -:~ ~- the requestcu :~ Je~ ~b~ ~0~;" ~Mr~e-~--'h~vt~ Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules I/We will comply with all't'~ co'~nditl'ons as set ~m 2. 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ I--I.,~, (Check one) .... ts [.~YES t_.lr~u , ~.~~ the statemem~ ~S lease cnec~- u . - - in a way that blocks a neighbor's dri~ew_a_Y~ ..... ~heir driveways- /f. I /We wtll not park.. . - ~ residents are trying to emer ox I/We will be consmerare Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fafia parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:~ -- Signature:_ Your children's classroom #s: ~-~~- please return this form to your child's teacher by F.__ridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need · faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the your support. To demonstrate Faxia's continued good Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 1. 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. (Check one) If answered YES lease check below all the im ortant reasons ou a tee with: ~'1. School children's safety. . · · ' ffic con estion at arrival and d~sm~ss.al t. tm. es at F~ _a[}_.._a~ arrival or . Less overall tra ., g _ _a ,^ o~,~r or leave tl~elr nome amm~ Helps Fada's neignoors who ne~u tu ~,,~ dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congesnon. ['] 5. Other (fill in): -- - 2. I/We will eomply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my ehild/children from Faria. If answer~se chec~k below ali the~°u a re--th:. q~/1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Children's names:~/-A~-~ Please print: /~,~ ~e ~ &quu~)~'q - Your children's classroom #s: ~-(~ Signature:_ ~5,~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fr~idav~ November 22~ 2002.. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. If~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino Cit3' Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ YES [~ NO (Check one) . . : If answered ~S~lease ~ reasons ou a tee with: School children's safety. · -' ~[~ii Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and disnussal ttmes at Fana. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-14. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in):_ 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino Cit3' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~'~NO (Check one) ' : If answer_ed _YES lease check below all the statements ou a tee with: 1. UWe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway.  . · are trying to enter or leave their driveways. 2. I/We will be constderate when resxdents Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of F aria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:_ ~ftlt-~'~fl .ql~Bihi~q'}~ ~O 1 Please return this form to your child's teacher by ~Fridav~ November 22~ 2002,: Children' s names:_~l) t x/y~__~_! ~ tq th~q~T H o ~ I Your children's classroom #s:._~ - William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Councd request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 1. 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered S lease check below all the im ortant reasons ou a r~e with: ~1. School children's safety. ~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 93. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home du[ing arrival or dismissal times. P~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ,~YES [~NO (Checkone) - : ~h tements ou a tee with: ]~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: "| O ~ ')/~./~ / ~ f.~,~. Your children's classroom #s:~ >~ /'""- 7/ ~d/ - . , · ' , ~ "v November 22, 2002.. Please return tl~is form to your child s teacher n> _~rloa ~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations*- We are half way through our 6.month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Farm School S~te Council request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 1. 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [5 No (Check one) If answered YES lease check below all the im ortant reasons ou a ree with: ~: School children's safe~- ~3i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fafia. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in): 2. IfWe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES EN° (Check one) · : I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway, driveways. ~: I/We willbe considerate when residents are trying t° enter °r leave their Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:_ CI4't~ ~r4~'~ Signature~,/~j Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22.2002.. Children's names:~~'~t's 6~'f Your children's classroom #s: *26 William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ YES [-~ NO (Check one) If answered YES lease check below all the im ortant reasons ou a ree with: 23 , I children's safety ....... -'- 1. Schoo ....... :^-. o+ arrival and d~sm~ssal t~mes Less over.ali trar~)c. _ g - --,am enter or leave their home during amvai or i Helps Fana's nmgnoors wno nc dismissal times. '~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES [~NO (Check one) ~tatements ou a tee with: · ' awa that blocks a neighbor's driveway- . . I/We will be consiaerate when resmcm~ ,~ ,~ t, '  i I/We vail not park 1.n Y. .J ....... ~,,ino to enter or leave their driveways Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Please print: ~] icrC. ~ P~A Children's names: _ ¥ourchil en'scl sroom#s ~' ~e ~ ~ / ~ r~ - ~ Please return this form to your child s teacher b5 ~r~dav~ November 22~ 2001 William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, · ~ ..... ,.dotions! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria an Cupertino School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for upcoming City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Fada's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~ute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. S [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES lease check below all thc ~m ortant reasons ou a tee wtth ool children s s~ ty. Sch ...... :-- -* o,~ival and dismissal times at Fana. . Less overall trar.., g ........... ~ave their home dunng arrival or Helps Faria's nelgtmors WhO neea tv ~m~, ,~- ,~ dismissal times. ~'~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. YES [~NO (Check one) t ou a ree w~th ~[J'l. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. J~'2. I/We will be considerate when residents are t~ying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: f/t~/V~- Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by _Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Fada Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonslxate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. eYES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES lease check below all the im ortant reasons ou a re with: ~3i 'School children's safety. , ftc congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Less o~ erall traf ~ , ......... ~od,,~ 'r home during amval or Helps Faria's neighbors WhO neea to ~,L~, ,,, ..... the~ . dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ENO (Check one) ~atements ou a tee with: 1/We w~.ll not par.. . [ _:4 ...... e ~--,ino to enter or leave their driveways. /i k in a wa that blocks a neighbor's driveway.. I/We v~ll be conslaerare when re~m~m~ ~ ,.a Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. your ehil ren' d s oom  William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, - -^ inure -arking, and the Faria · ~ e are half way through, our 6-month pilot project tot 3u-m v . - ess. In reparation for an upcoming Cupertino Congratulations..,W~eo~.~ .o,~ n nilot ro3ect as a great succ· L _ a~ ,~.o O-minute parking zone, we need School Site Councl ,? request pe. anent 3 To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the City Council meeting in which o will bl forwarded to the your support. Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which ............... Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers ............... 1. l/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3u-m~j~te parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~//YES [~NO (Check one) ~dYES lease check below all ~ reasons ou a ree with: ~'~ School children's safety.. . --;,,o~ and dismissal times at Faria. . ~F~ ~ o,~ nverall traffic congesuon a[ -.m,,-,.,. -- ~ove their home during amvm or "' ~ "~ ~Faria's neighbors who need to emer m ,~,~ . ~.,~e P~ismissal times. -'-'~ are not hindered by traffic congesuon. ~[~4. Helps ensure emergency vemc~c~ ~5. Other (fill in):.- 2. I/We ~..ili comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-m nute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules ,~'hen eith/gr dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ ['~NO (Check one) If answered YES lease check below all the statem~th-: /We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor'S driveway. . ~/t~. I'/we will be considerate when residents are to'lng to enter or leave their ~lrivewayS. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino Cit~ Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:_ Signature:__ Children'snames. ~/[?c?~. b,'o~ ,~'-^') _ ~ Your children's classroom ~s:~ - Ple~form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002 William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria parents, t~,,,,,,romlatlons! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria S c h o 'l' i ' ouncil (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. If answered YES lease check below all the im ortant reasons ou a ree with: [~ School children's safety. .Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times· ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion· ~ 5. Other (fill in):_ 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. X~S ~NO (Check one) ~ements ou a tee witln: · ' in a wa that blocks a neighbor's driveway. . . ~ I~; ~}1111 ;;topoarns~derate awyhen residents are trying t° enter °r leave their dn~ eways' Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Children's names: Your children's classroom #s:_ I ~ } Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002: William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria parents, ~- .....*-~otions! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria for an Cupertino School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation upcoming City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. IPvVe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~ YES ~1 NO (Check one) If answered YES lease check below all the ~m ortant reasons ou a ree w~th ~] 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in):_ 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES ~NO (Check one) - : ~ 1. I/We will not park m a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. Iq 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: [- ~ ~ t-I ~ Children's na~,~es: ~-I' ~zq V3/q~ ,. Your children s classroom #s~ Signature:_ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Fafia Parents, ~ ..... ,,Zations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and tlv~ ~aria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cu :crtino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, ~t, need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~ryES ENO (Check one) If answered YES lease check below all the im ortant reasons ou a ree with: ["] 1. School children's safety. ]~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fada. ~l 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~-]NO (Check one) ~h ~ernents oua ee with: · in a wa that blocks a neighbor's driveway. . . , .. ~i I/Wewfllnotpark... Y, _..~ ...... e ~.,,ino to enter or leave me~r an, eways I/We will be conslclerate wllen resmc~ ,~ ~; ~ ' Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Li'~ex- ]__;CA Children's names:_/q ~ 16~, _~L Your children's classroom #s:.__~_~ Signature: //~L~- --~'~ ' ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, _ pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria Congratulations! W e ,~ e rha~}fs ;VuarY pti~;~ ¢ohj ~ct[r a6s ?~;taht School Site Council (SS) success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. l/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. yes No (Check one) If answered YES lease check below all the im ortant reasons ou a ree with: {-'11. School children's safety. . . . · all traff~c congestion at arrival and &smlss.al .tim, es at F, ar!a. . · __  Less over ........ or leave their nome ourlng arrlvat m i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to ~t~,~ dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~,YES V~NO (Check one) If~answer~ed YES, please check below all the statements_y~u ag~ree with~: · a wa that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~}i I/We will not park in Y, ........ ;.,-~,,~ ter or leave their driveways· I/We will be considerate when resmems a[~ ,~ ~,,~ -'~ ~n Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parbnt or guardian completing this letter: Please print:?--~[~~c1 --~L~'P'~fi/[* _l~ Children's name~t~ ' ~ Your children's classroom #s:_ Signature:__ ~ your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002.. Please return this form to William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 1. I/We support . '- *~- streets adjacent to Farm. 30-minute parking zone m eYES [~NO (Check one) ~ll the im ortant reasons ou a~ ~ 1. School children's safety... ~ arrival and dismissal times at Faria. -~L~231 Less overall traffic congest,on at ........ ,hoi~ ham durin~ arrival Helps Faria's neighbors who need to emer or t~aw .......... e _ or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~-~YES ~NO , (C ,he~c~kk ~;le~t ements ou a ree with: If answered YES ,ease cncc.~ -- I/W e will not park in a way that b?cks a neighb, or'~ driv, ew~a_y; ..... ~heir driveways- i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter ut Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Children s names: ' ' Please prmu · classroom #s:~~--- Signature:~ Your children' s please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002_. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/'O¢~support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ['11. School children's safety. Less overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~: Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. '~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with ali the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: 21. I/rOe- will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. · 1/94e will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~--~0~-~ ~ V,--LC._0 \ 9~__ Signature: Children's names: ~.~/~ Your children's classroom #s: Please r~urn this form to your child's teacher by Frida~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations*. We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~ree with: School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. l~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. by traffic congestion. ~ ~(4. Helps ensure emergency vetficles are not hind, ered N< ce¢~, -~,'~[C t>~ 95. Other(fill[n): J~4~'5 ~ ~:~6'3qt _z~4~,+,ow. , I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~[_Y. ES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways., Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian compl~t[ng this letter: Please print: ~.Lx' (~- Children's names: ~\~f'% ~ O~ Signature: . Your children's classroom #s:. ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: . School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~,YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with: '~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: 6tarOI ~v[a~_~ Children's names: ~.l~r~r~,~( Signature: ~ . F~_~--~ Your children's classroom #s: 2~('~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-mlnute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ENO (Checkone) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you a~ree with: [-] 1. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~_ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Pleaseprint:_~'f~fq'~fS~ KBVLL/~N Children's names: ---~R~OT:~ ~,*f~L/t_t~Pc~ Signature: ~ ~ff,_O x_ Your children's classroom #s: 2~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Trivets 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~ NO (Check one) If answer?~f~ YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: ~l/~3chool children's safety. ~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-I 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or  dismissal times. · elps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-mino/te parking zone, with the California ..M. oto.r, Vehic_le Co~de,.and with the Faria Parking Rules w~hen/ther dropping off or picking up my chdd/chddren t¥om l~ ann. ~2~srES ENO (Check one) If answe~d-YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with~ ~/1 ./Iq~e will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway, driveways. ~ I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: .~.~.q~-~)~g~{~T~l ~l,,\c~6l'~hq,3C--~6-?Children's names?>9'3~--~ g ~b,~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations*. We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 1. School children s sa~ ty. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Far!a. . . i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during amval or dismissal times. ~451 Helps nsure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion, , -- 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you aCree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ['~3)-e ,L., ~Otx! Children's names: ~ll~J '~6. u,I Signature: ~"? .~~ ~ Your children's classroom#s: '~-' ~''-'~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with~ iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~[~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ENo (Check oue) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: ~-1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared withe, he Cupertino Ciy Council: Name of Faria parent or guar ~ · -~ Please print:/.~t.L~O/ ~~ .~J~A)~__ Chilaren'snames:/k(~ /"/t0~dAJ~' S ign?~' your children's classroom #s: ~ t/ .~ease~eturn ~1~°tm lo your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. eYES [-~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fada. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. /4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ¢f s If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: t~xC ~q t~ t4/~ ~0 H g ~'~ Children's names: Signature: ~'~__ ~'~-~"'"' Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [-~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. t~J4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES [-]NO (Check one) if answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:~ &lQ ~, -)- Ck(~ ~ )q'l Signature:/~.,~. ~.~/~_~ ~/~.A~,~ ~ d' ' Your children's classroom #s:_ ~-'-~- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names:5 C~[ i ~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. IFWe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ YES [-~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in):. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. 0No Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~]t -~*',,~ C~,~// Children's names:-~'{ r-eS' ex Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with'.. School children safety. al. ' 's 4~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. 4~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. _~[5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with ali the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with: ~4~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~/~?~ ~ 6V I>r/~ Children's names:_ ~0[¥o[6[ Signature: ~ . Your children's classroom#s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations*. We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. IP~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~//YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~1. School children's safety. ~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~S [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: f.i/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. /We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: pOOI~V Pc Your children's classroom #s: ~' ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. eYES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 2School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~41 Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~0/~ Q 5/4~CN ~/~(-~ Signature: /qf/A~-~-4M~.~ ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Fa_da Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/XVe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30- ,minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YEs ~ NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~t. School children's safety. _[J~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. · Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion· [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. IFvVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules W~y either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ES E NO (Check one) If answered YES. vlease check below all the statements you agree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parem or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~d~ 0~ ~ <~ OL,~ Signature: ~ ?~o ~,.?r0- ~ ~ A') Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names:--~Y~ £~ ~'~ cc3,~ Your children's classroom #s: '~ ~-- William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. fi~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~. School children's safety. ,~ Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. /We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: eleaseprint: ~/~_c~B. r~, ~otlc~AL~ L Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the ............................................................................... 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. EYES [~NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping offor picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ["]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: eleaseprint: V l~//~c K~tS~..~ Signature: t[ ~ Children's names: ¢ [ ~ 9 [°L'l~'Tf' Your children's classroom #s: ,-~"-_ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanem status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping offor picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ?eS ~z 7' 8~ 0 ~ Signature: Children's names: ~ ]¥/~ N }~,g' Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ ' ~ [VPr/< 12(/~-/t4' Signature: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22, 2002. Children's names: 25-- Your children's classroom #s: William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Doily Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. x/~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES lease check below all the ~m ortant reasons ou a tee w~th 1. School children's safety.  verall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~_ 2. Less o , · ...... ~ ,~ o.,,~ or leave their home during arrival or [-] 3. Helps Faria-s ne~gnoors wno ne~u dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ ~NO (Check one) if answered YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with'_. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please p nt: 3' q¢1 Signa~e: ~,: ~:,.f ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: },~:~ ~ Your children's classroom William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 22I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/XVe will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:.5Ol>tq~.lct~ I>~1'~ $~ta~ Si Children's names:  Your children's classroom #s: 9q gnature: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~/YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School ch;ldren safety. [~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-I 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~-~ Lt (,h.a~C~ ~/]q ~'~'~ Children's names:~ 1~ ~[~a /Y/qO'~-p~ Signature: _~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: i' School children's safety. . Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fana. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below ali the statements you agree with: ~il 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~] 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are lD'ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Signature: q_t~tJZ~'"e'~ ~ -- Your children's classroom #s: -~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~ES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES ~']NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below ali the statements you agree with: ~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: X~x i ~ fl~ ~__ i Children's names: ~ ~V [ ~~ r Your children's classroom #s: )~ Please return tills form to you child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Fada's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~[YES ~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 1. School children s s~ ty. Less overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fana. 31 Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with: IFxVe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i IFWe will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ?~~" Your children's classroom #s: 24 ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria Parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: i' School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. /~4. Helps ensure ememency v?icles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 5. Other (fill in): ~; ~_~ ~x i'.;; ~,~ '~'r~ .~5~L"~! 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~. oYES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: [r?~-~c3 \ frgn~!~i Children's names: ~X//C}a/3tk../I ~ ~r~YO Signature: ~,2~,~-~,~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ ~- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday', November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ENO CCbeck one If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~ree with: School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4.' dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. O 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~f. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor s driveway. ~/f. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Pleaseprint: ~f oN~ ~-~ ~/~ Children'snames: ~--~/~/~- Signature: ~'~c¥'.5' ,c~~r' Your children's classroom#s: 'Zg-~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~E ute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. S D NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~_.. HChOol children's safety. ess overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. elps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~_~ dismissal times. El 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules W~ser dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~. i//Wwe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. e will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ,~o,~x~ C~xootxo~V' Signature: ~~ Children's names: ~.e,.X ~coO'x~ C~~ Your children's classroom #s: ~.,L]. Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a gmat success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Fada's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES ["] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~(~,_~ ¥ [-~tg/;~ Your children's classroom #s: ~+ ~}~.~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers l/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES ~'~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: '~i' School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fada. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~y~E.~ S ~]go (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ ~.~ ~r y/~ Signature: ~ ~/ ~ Children' s names:/xl~/-~ (~- Your children's classroom #s: ~' ¢ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ffws [3No Checkone If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~. School children's safety. [~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fada. [~]3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: '~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. · [~. I/We will be considerate when residents are Ir-ting to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~2 blt~ 1~ ~ ~~ Children's names: ~v~ Signature:ease retu'~rn this Your children's classroom #s: ~ PI ' form to y child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. x~ YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~]3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. rS (Check one) ENo If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~L~"~ ~ ~ Signature: ~~~-"~ ~ Children's names: ~)~-J Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ,~S UNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: L.LChOol children's safety. ess overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~_~e dismissal times. lps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules er dropping offor picking up my child/children from Faria. [-~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: U1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~A,/klq ~ ~ ~ 10'-'~ [ Signature: .~, [~"~ .~A____, Children's names: ~O. IX¥ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~"rYES ['~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~. School children's safety. [~e2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. DYES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: .~_~ ,,_~'~,~z,~c~P/~,2~.,l~ef~e~hildren's names: ,~l,.~_~.'z-T Signature: ~~ Your children's classroom #s: I Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~S [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: /. School children's safety. ~41 Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minu~te parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when/efther dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES ~]NO (Check one) If ansv~red YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: '~ 1. !/AVe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~O~; Your children's classroom #s: ~ 2- t~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria.  YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: . School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~J~ Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. i Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. YES NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 21I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~J~[ ~ t~'gV (~ ~ ~ Children's names: Signature: y~(~.~O/fi~ ~/j,,~,-'q~"~ Your children's classroom #s: -~0t' Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 211 School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 5Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. Other (fill in):. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules w~fnyEeither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S u NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian complTing this letter: Please print: J{)~]~ ~,~ Signature:~ t~C~ ~d Children, s name s:/.?L//~ h/~ a. Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: }School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ['-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. Checkone If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 21I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: _.~5/~, ~9~. ~,~_ ~ Children's names: ~t~rl 0 ie kft~ Your children's classroom #s: 9~5 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: i' School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 121 I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~~ ,.~liN~ ~-ttE4~P.~ Children's names: ~te~^,~o..,~ Ct,~v~.tod7 ~,~O/~~ Your children's classroom #s: Z3 Signature: Please return tl~is form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~ES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: .School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-I 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with thc Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~] O~ ~ ~ ~ v4, Signature: ~/~ ._~ ~ Jd~K~:~ Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations*. We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. /~YES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. J~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. J~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. gT S DNO (Check one) answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i IFxVe will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~{ ~ 7-~- ~, C-¢h Signature: Children's names: {~t~-~ Clx; ~q --'~-----L Your children's classroom#s: 7~'~t ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ['~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [3 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~'~YES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: ~] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~] 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~4~xc~ ~ t~d ~0P~ Children's names: Signature: ~~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~1~,3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~x2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: eleaseprint:.~ ~ ~t0,~.& ~O,~I~ Children's names: fi[/x.[q/ [2~t~¥6L ~ ~.~ ~ ..~.~,- Your children's classroom #s: ~3 Signature: ,l~rase return th~s form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES ~ NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. 1~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. eYES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~v/tC~ Your children's classroom #s: fl--~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations*. We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the s ................................................................................ I. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. O 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ v~ ~C~ ~ Signature: Children's names: /~t v~x..~ ~ ~a-t__..--~ ~ ~/~ Your children's classroom #s: ¢ ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida% November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~] (Check NO one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: }. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times.  Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. i Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ ~ g C~ '( ~ [3 Signature: ~ &f4~/~ ~'~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. Children's names: V~ C~¢-)t Your children's classroom/ts: William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES D NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: }iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fa_da. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['-15. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: If r4 23tL Your children's classroom #s: -2. ,z, Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ..School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. · Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. O 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2.I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. 'TYES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. i H elps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. BYEs ENo (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria ~ guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~[//~;~tl~H ~ ~[1; kl'l~ \ Your children's classroom #s: ~ [ ~"~ ease retu is form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support ff, e Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. '~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~.~ HSChool children's safety. ess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. elps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or [~4./ dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [']5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/~e will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~trES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: .I/~ will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We' will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or ~ completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: r-I ~'~ ~ ¥ c~5~ ~_,' [z.c~ r~-ff Your children's classroom #s: 2- ~ · Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ,~'/E S [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~. School children's safety. ~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. d~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. x.~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ,[~/YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/XVe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: names: ' _~I'-} ~M,q 7~ ,q i(~/( Children's ~~ Yo~ c~ldren's classroom ~s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. DYES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: D 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. DYES NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 121 I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please prim: '~,q ~J~. ~b//9 0 Signature: Children's names:~ Your children's classroom #s: ~2~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/rVES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~,~. School children's safety. · Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. I-13. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. {~'~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ..I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~'.~/~lq~p~f~ (~0LAI</~LU~/ Children's names: ~;~AV ~ULAt<AL0~I Signature:~~ Your children's classroom #s: 2.2.. Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/XVe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ['] 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 0 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Pleaseprint: ~or,'5 fi~t'~nazoA~ Signature: ~ ~ Children's names: ~/,'Z~e~,~/~ /~/~t"at,~ z,oW Your children's classroom #s: ~2.. Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~] NO (Check one) I_f answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~'1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~S [-]NO (Check one) !f answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 21I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: leasepnnt. ~* /<1,(~, -~-~,~_~ Children's names: 2b'Jfi-~ ~/'[a-~ Signature: /'~/-~,.//~'~ . Your children's classroor~;s: ..D-~. Pleas~return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES ~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. ~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. J~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. )[~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. I~lease list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Lll~JC,[4~,J~ [A}~ Children's names: ~[~[~/~/~ Signature: {~A~)~ °"~t_~ ~fv% Your children's classroom #s: ~'~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 200'~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ]~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~} School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. /~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. /~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['-15. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. fl~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: } I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway i I/We ' ' · ' wall be considerate when residents are trying to enter o; leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~] [ ~'- f /X/~ ~,d ~ Signature: ~~' Children's names: VI ~//7',zf~ /'V) ~TV'] Your children's classroom #s: 2- 2.- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Dear Faria parents, Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success· In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minnte parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers ' -' 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. eYES [~ NO (Check one) If answere~dd YES~lease ch~°rtant reas°ns ou a tee with: 1. School children's safety- . · · · at Faria. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and d~sm~ssal t~mes ~i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. . , ~ ,_:_~ h,~ traffic congestion· l-lei s ensure emergency vetficles are not mnu~,~ vj p ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. YES [~NO (Check one) ' · ~If ~es~ check below all the statement~ ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. · · are trying to enter or leave their driveways. J~2. I/We will be considerate when resxdents please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:~/.? x__~ ~ t Signature'.~----~ /-/~--~-~ ~ Your children's classroom #s:?2__~ · ~ .... ,- 'eacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002_. Please return this form~to your cnnu ~ · -- Children s-nm~ .~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School D;strlc November ~ 8, 2002 Dear Faria parents, 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the F~ia In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino We are half way through our . 'nute ~arking zone, we need --* stems for the 30 m.t ,..~.~,~ our neighbors, the Congratulations! will request pe~rr~r~ia~,~ working cooperative~Y '~ ~'~' forwarded to the Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. School Site. ' in which our SSC ·Counctl me~m~gA~' ~e Faria's continued goon ~ollowing letter, which will be City ~ -o d~onstra completes the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family ................................................ your support. ~ Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers ........................ Council for a permanent I/We support the Izaria SchoOl Site Council's request to the Cupertino Cit~ 1. 30-minute parking zone in the streets adlacent to Faria. ~YES ~NO (Checkone) · : 1. Sch°°lchildre~:acf~estion ' 1 ddismissalt, imesatFarl, a' . ~2 Less overall, rte . hbors who neate~tt~;antt~ or leave thetr home during arrtval or ~3' Helps Faria s nelg - - ~--. traffic congestion. ~-' dismissal times. ..~icles are not hindered )~'4 Helps ensure emergency ~*~ [~5. other (fill in):_ 30-minute parking zon , picking up my child/children from Faria. when either dropping off or ' NO (Check one) a tee with: ~ leave their driveways. not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's drtveway- I/We shared with the Cupertino Cit~ Council: please list any concerns or comments you would like i]ease print: Signature ' & t0~/ Your children' s classr°°m #s:~ · :~ld's teacher by William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES DNO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: W 1. SchOol children's safety. . tLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. DES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: .~ ~z ~1' ~ ~--' ..~ Signature: Children's names: Your children's classroom Please r~eturn this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YE S DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: J3i School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or [~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules wTyEeither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES. olease check below all the statements you agree with: [~i I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: (X7 6~ ( ~P~ ~6~V Signature: (~ 0'-"-'~'~ C-~ Children's names: ~E)~ ;~ ~z~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child s teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES [-~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. [~'2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~'3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~'4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: L/! Wr-t 0 / Signature: Children's names: ,7~',vA/,f rD Your children's classroom #s: z z Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. S YES D NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ii School children' s safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 0 5. Other (fill in): 2. IPvVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: (~'~ V/9t"~,~ ,~ /.7 ~, ,t, ,-~, ,~ ~):'~/~. Your chil~en's cl~sroom ~s: ~ ~ Signat~e: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers IFvVe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES [--] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ]-] 5. Other (fill in):. o IPvVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list. any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~--~J3~[- ~t){ Children's names: Signature: ~t4~.. L ~ Your children's classroom #s: , Please return this form to your child s teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~-~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ['q 1. School children's safety. 231 Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~] 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ I)IP~ - ~; rx~ Children's names: .~,9'* c c~ Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. l/V~e support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~ NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]YES ~-]NO (Check one) If ans~vered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~,2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Pleaseprint:__~t~,[F¢?~ ~, Signature: ~/_~.~q. ~r~~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: t~/~ r t'~,. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~y~Ute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. S ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: . . School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): I/'vVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules W~y either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Please print: Signature: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Children's names: ~0¢,_~eg¢ ~-~0~i ~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ I Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in thc streets adjacent to Faria. OYES ~ NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in):_ 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30~minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: c~Q ] William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES BI NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: ?leaseprint:-T3A~-)x/d~g ¢/A dh Signature: Children's names: ~_ ~) U~-_~ ~d~ . , . Your chddren s classroom #s. ~- Please return this form fi) your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: .School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. Sd/ s SNO (Checkone If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: i/Wewill not park in a way that a neighbor's driveway. blocks /We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: .~ ~40~/4-~ h4 ~'p,J 0 d Signature: ~ Children's names: ~) (~ Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. gYES [~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ?/i School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~'~q~.~7~. C/~Z~-~/~/~J9 Children's names: ,l~6'~,w ~~'.')~0 Signature: '~~~_~ Your children's classroom #s: ~31 "l'lease return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~yinUte parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. D NO (Check one) ES If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~ree with: 3."School children's safety. Less overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules W~/Eeither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~/~/~)/~_,_~ Signature: Children's names: Your children's classroom tis: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: }iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~13. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. if ES D NO (Check one) answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: f..l~J~ .[~.Lt_. ~ Signature: ~.~ ~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22, 2002. Children's names: ~}1" 5'~'w' ~ William Faria Academies Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-'] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: tg'Y/ t~ Your children's classroom #s: ~] Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. IfWe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. ~] 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~5. Other (fill in): I~- I,~ t~t~^ ~rKx~ ~1- ~,,,-e.~ l)~r a,.,rrv, gc-~4q (^'w3~. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /~,~,o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t% Signature: ~ ~,d~,~ ~ Children's names: /~,l~l~v,~,~, x/acLo ~ Your children's classroom #s: ~' , ~-I Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers l/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES ENO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~ree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure e .mergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~5. Other(fill in): [~% h~,r,2Ae., ~,c, tetc$t, Mu ov~ v-o~/ 6t,,~,j>. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. SYES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~-'D[~ l/'-$bh "~-~-_~ Signature: ~o[kdxa ~ TF~C--' Children's names: '~iq~ it/CC "-~C~ Your children's classroom #s: ~1 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Aeadmies Plus Seh001 Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~sUte parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 2. I/'vVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ]~ES DNO (Check one) answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~,ree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ ~~/~ Children,s names: tL/t~v Your children's classroom #s: ,~,~ - Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. EXHIBITS END HERE William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. RYES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~1. School children's safety. [-] 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. J~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~]~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. /~]-2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: ~-3~D Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES B NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: {~. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. · [~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/ES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~'O.A~'~O.~ Your children's classroom #s: ~C~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I~upport the Faria School Site Cou.ncil's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~inute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~S [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. I-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. l-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [-] 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~, ~'[A..~ Children's names: Signature: )-~t (J.~/ Your children's classroom #s: ~M2) Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~,YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. I-[ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in): I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~E,~ S [~NO (Checkone) If answered YES, l~lease check below all the statements you agree with: I/We wall not park in a way that blocks a neighbor s driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~x~ ~)'-3~ Signature: Children's names: /~ \~1~ (x3q~ Your children's classroom #s:_ ~ Please return ihis form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~ute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. S [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the important reasons you a~ree with: 3..School children's safety. Less overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules w~either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S 0 NO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the statements you a~,ree with: ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [3,~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: eleasepfint: ~[...,1~_ ~ Children's names: ~ '~(_~ ~ [~' ~ Please return t~is form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. IPNe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~'~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-I 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. r Yl~o S ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ,~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: P~)CIC~ ~br Signature: ,? ~ 7~:2/? Pleas~ return ,~his [or~ to your child's teacher by Friday~ November Children's names: ) , d Your children's classroom #s: ~ 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with:  . School children's safety. 4 L ess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. O 5. Other (fill -in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 221 I/We will in that blocks a neighbor's driveway. Hot park a way I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: &l;o~ Signature: Children's names: x~t r~ ~L~ ~ Please return this to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parems, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [3 5. Other (fill in):. I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: L ~ C/~ Erl ~ Signa e: Children's names: t~/Va~/ Your children's classroom #s: ,~ tS) Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations*. We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/fYES ~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aeree with: [~i. School children's safety. .. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~/{. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City CouneU: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /~J-(/~ ~ Signature: ~--~ Children's names: '~/t \'& f~' Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~,~YE S ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3School children's safety. Less overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~fES E NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the statements you agree with: ~./I/We will not park m a way that blocks a neighbor s dr~ve ay. [~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: I.J 1~/. 1~4~al~o.~tS~ 7 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~ 1~'~ Your children's classroom William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~ NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iiSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [3 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [}iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~lo~O~r 1~1[J Signa.e: Children's names: TI ~"./[,'Q/ L Your children's classroom #s: ~0 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Fada's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~'~YES 0 NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iiSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES 0NO (Check one) / If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Cb'PV Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~9~/~4 Your children's classroom #s: William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~.YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ,]~ 121 School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["l 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ]2' I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. · I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: AAZd L Children's names: L/~,~/~_'a~7.; ,~_ Your children's classroom #s: ~P Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and thc Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success, tn preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aeree with: .,i. School children's safety. .L. es~s ov_,erall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~. Helps raria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. DYEs [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: l~/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children, s names:/ax~d( ~x C~<vvv~,/~ i~ Your children's classroom #s: ~9/~//~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~[YES [-'1 NO (Check one) If answered YES, please cheek below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [-'JNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Please print: Signature: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Children, s names: (~0 vx Your children's classroom #s: 24) Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~Es ['-]NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3! School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~/4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules yEeither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Signature: Children's names.%~'~ ?F/i/' 7~-~i ~/'i ~'/q4 Your children's classroom #s: / ~5~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with:  S chool children's safety. Less overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 1-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules /ither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES. ~lease check below all the statements you aeree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~,f-~/~ ]-- l/x/ Signature: / ~ . t'"~' Children's na~es~l~rt'~h s~g ~e~ Your children's classroom #s: ' I q Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minme parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's cominued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: i' School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times.  Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. i Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~(YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES. l~lease check below all the statements you agree with: [~J~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor s driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residems are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please prim: Signature: Children's names: /f/~r~ ~/ Your children's classroom #s: / ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. (Checkone> If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or l~ave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Couneih Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~5~ l/t/c~e Your children's classroom #s: / ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. "~Y E S [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~,YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~_.1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /~ Uf, f) L-~l JQOTT~ Signature: Children'snames: Pr,PlT ypr F-._(7 7-7- Your children's classroom #s: \ o~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ENO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aeree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please prim: /~,~-~,~n ~7 "v°x Signature: Children'snames: [~i~vq o~ wO om~ Your children's classroom #s: { 7 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES [~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. Less o3~ral! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES E]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: C~/~-3'd32~ L2E3j Children's names: Your Children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~S D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~. School children's safety. ~ Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S [~]NO (Check one) If answered YES., please check below ali the statements you agree with: will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ Signature: Children's names: ~r,e, t z t · ~47~/L43' Your children's classroom #s: '~a lc/` Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Fada's cominued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the statements you aeree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: , ~ ~, ,, ~ ? l ~[ I ..~ Signature: ~ c,;~ ~.~i ~-- ' /!/_ , ,~.' / / Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: / ? Plia~e retur~ this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: i School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. DS. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES [--]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you aeree with: 2.I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~"]' ~4'- Children's names: Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES 0 NO (Check one) · If answered YES, please check beloW all the important reasons you agree with: [~ I. School children's safety. ~ 2~: Less overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fa_da. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: V £ ~,l~,¢-l- signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: I William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ ~--~ YEs DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: D 1. School children's safety. [-] 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-[3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~["]4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. EYES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: · ["] 1. IF~e will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. D 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: /~ School children's safety. · i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~],3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [ Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. i Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Par'king Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. J~(YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da ~._~,ent or guardi~ ta~ompleting this letter: Please print:/ Signature: Please return this form to yo/child's teacher by Children's names: . '5 fZ Your children's classroom #s: ~-~ . t Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [3 NO Checkone> If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~,ree with: i School children's safety. ~ Less ov&ral! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES DSO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: gl. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: l~ ~ ~ ~ Signature: ~ ~- -~-~-~"~' ' Children's names[~>c~q '; e [ ¥our hil en's classroom I Cf' Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 2.School children's safety. Less overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~..Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~ dismissal times. ~14. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): t I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~.~/~1 H {~ ~t/LLf~ Signature: ~la.. ~ ' Children's names: [¢~ Iq N ~lq t~9E~ Your children's classroom #s: [ 6~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Fa-ia Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: · [~, School children's safety. .Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ¢he ko e, If answered YES, ~lease check below all the statements you aeree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria pare Jr-or guardian completing this letter: Please p-rint:, '~ I- $ ~o Signature: ~-/.44~ Chitdreh's n~.amesi ~f~q ~' Your children's Classrd~m #s: - I'~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. {~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules svhen either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, l~lease check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Please print: Signature: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Children's names: ~ ~! Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Fa_da Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~S parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ['-~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~. HSChool children's safety. ess overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. elps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-[ 5. Other (fill in):. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minut~ parking, zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules ~hen~er dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~[YES ENO (Check one) If answered, YES~ please check below all the statements you agree with: e will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. e will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino Cit~ Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: , ] Si,na : t Your children, classroom #s: I~ - .,..i ! . Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frlda¥~ November ~ ~002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulationsl We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent s~atus for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I,~upport the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~S DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~ree with: ~. School children's safety. [~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 2. I/~ill comply with all the conditions as. set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code,.and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my chil~_ re. rom Farm. If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ I/~11 not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~. I W~will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: eleaseprint: ~(~/~' ' ~ '~--~ ~C ~'L~ Signature: _.---- Children's names: ~¥ (7°x~ Your children's classroom/ts: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~}i School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Ii/3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [J~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-'] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the statements you agree with: [~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: Yq Q~ ~L~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. '[~'~ES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: . School children's safety. ~3 Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [2[4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2.;will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print?~ ~35~ ~l~lt~14~ ff~7~ Signature: Your children's classroom #s: / ~q~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/'*Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: }School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~]3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. []YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: s/A Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ¥'IA, '-L~ [~/aox~ Children's names: Signature: ~--~,.,~., '.~'~ ~ Your children's classroom #s: t t ,,.~'j/" ~-"'/'-) /'d /~,/ . L/ . ' t h b F d N b 22 Please return this-dorm to your child s eac er y ri a¥~ ovem er ~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-m~te parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~ NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 1~..~ School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fafia. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4.~ dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~] 5. Other (fill in):_ 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. YEs 7]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: /We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. /We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridaw November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~{~ /-JJ,>elt..- Your children's classroom #s: t/iq William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~fi~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ~_/'g;~//~c Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ShxIt'~,,o~ t~}aOl_C~.vvl; Your children's classroom #s: ] ~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Fa_da Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~//YES [~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~ree with: ~1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ t' O,~ Signature: Children's names: /..~gd. cg'P-J/t Ct'h.-"- Your children's classroom #s: / f~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations*. We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. L~ES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: L~. School children's safety. t.~Z Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. t_-~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 0 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: L,~. I~e will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. (~2~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print~J ~0 A/,~/<, I ~ ///~ K,qA//~AQ_3/~ Children's names: Signature: /~x~ ' Your children's classroom #s: 1 ~ %aseretu rn this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~]/1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~]/2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: L~ El ~ 0,~,~ (;he v~ Signature: ~.r~/~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ,_IQ. c~ }~ Your children's classroom #s: / ~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~'/ES ['-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~ree with: ~. School children's safety. .Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~ dismissal times. elps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when ther dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S ~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: ~. i/we will not park in a way that blocks a neig,h,~or's driveway. /We will be considerate when residents are Ir5 ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: x~t"llN, Your children's classroom #s: ~' ~-~ / ~ P~ase return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~S E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~. School children's safety. [~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~[]'3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Fi~ria. ~YES ['-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ ~~, Signature: Children's names: ~i~;~ Your children's classroom #s: [ ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~,4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ,_~e~0..~y [- ~ ~k Your children's classroom #s: [ 8 William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES BNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: /~1i School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. J~[4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. I YfES NO (Check one) answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~sTrt? Signamre: Children's names: /~5,~Pn }n .~~ Your children's classroom #s: Jt~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~]NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iiSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. 3ES (Check one) ENo answered YES~ please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~ O~C_ ~ ~ Your children's classroom #s: I 8 ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: /}School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: /.~.Wf~Cg Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES [--] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: J~-t. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. J~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["15. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~[YES ['~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: '~at~J,/ Signature: ~/',~,ff~//~/ ~( Children' s names: l~ [,~? Your children's classroom #s: [ ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1./f/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. h kone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 1... LSChool children's safety. ess overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or  dismissal times. . . . ~hlPe~ ~1~2) ~ r~Y~ v~hi~ r e dl~ °n~ 2.~_(~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when F_~er dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. I~YES [__] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: .w W~ will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. · will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways· Please list any concerns or comments you would, like shared wi~h tile Cupertino City Council: e of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~,o~ C) t'ql T'A '~b~A ~ Children's names: ~e~SS t~-1 ~~~c>~ _ Your children's classroom #s: /5 Signature: / t l'leas~ Yet~rn this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. d~rYE S DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~'1. School children's safety. ~J~i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~,~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~ ,q~/'~ ~- Your children's classroom #s: / ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES [~NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ,~}! School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying t.o enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: .~ Iq r) }4 tzrl h/I [~ I0 Dr V ~1 L ~t Children's names: ,~¥~ .~ ri [/7 ~ Signature: ~l~r~ ~,~_0,~ . Your children's classroom #s: 4- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. //~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with:  School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~/_4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 0 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 121 I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: 1~?'~, ~O~"_~ Signat~ I~ ~k~/,qr- Children's names: ]~)[IVIl~\! Your children's classroom #s: / Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3 1~ School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. · Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles a~.e,not hindered by traffic congestion. ~/~. Other (fill in):/~lMog3 IA,'9 ~ 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~/~ I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children,s names: ~ ~ ~I~A~] Your children's classroom #s: '~ ~/~'~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. l/'*Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~J/YE S ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: '~3 School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules W~yn either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ES t~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 21 I/We will not in that blocks driveway. park neighbor's a way a I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: oL~ hon~ O. Lz~ Signature: ¢' ~ ~ Children's names: ~O,)~D~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. Dolly Travers I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~}! School children' s safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 1~ 5. Other (fill in): C,4~q I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: '~// Signature: Children's names: ~(~'CtSxfn -ff Your children's classroom #s: P?-P'q ] ~- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES D NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ii School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]YES ~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~ ~'~. ///~ Your children's classroom #s: /~tT?J'~ /~"' Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES ~ NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ii School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~,ff~4 ~ . ~ ~ ~_~ Signature:~ Children's names: /~7/~¢ ~FA~ , /5-- Your children s classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: . School children's safety. ~31 Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. fi4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules W~y either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ES ,,NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2.. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City CounCil: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: 0~0[¥01 ~2i'75~ Signature: _/~_~_ ~ ~ ~ Children's names: /~ [ ~gel~C Your children's classroom #s: ~t~ I ( Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES D NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~[~1i School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. YES NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~1. I/We wtll not park ~n a way that blocks a neighbor s drive ay. /~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ~--'~~ Children's names: [~- & Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Fafia's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Doily Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ENO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: }. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency, vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~5. Other (fill in): Help ,n *kt o I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~fiYES ENO (Check one) f answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: [~1 I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are lD'ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian complet, ing this letter: Please print' l[d/~/~f~/ -- ~--~57[~'~ ~'"d)(-4 Children's names- Signature:' ~---/~ ~ ~/,~/ Your children's classroom #s: f(/fpl~/~se re~rn~is fo~m t~o your child,s teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehiqles are not hindered by traffic congestion. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) I£ answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ Children's names: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. //~YES E NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: i' School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. 55Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. i Other (fill in): t~/6x~) ~ *to ~F~ ~.~r cA~e~ ~ 4t, e c/a4~rao~'. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria.  S NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ~37~ Your children s classroom #s: /~ Pl~'~se return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonslxate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [-)')'~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~1. School children's safety. ]/. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. · Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. '~/YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statemems you agree with: ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~1~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would, like shared,with the ~up~e~ino Ci~ Co,.unc!!:~ ~ Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: Your children s classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent stares for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES [-'1 NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ? 12. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~t31 Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or [~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: {'~"' Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~ Iq Your children's classroom #s: William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively w/th our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times.  Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. i Other (fill in): 2. I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~irES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are tD'ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: 5IA.~ C~IA 5~ql ~ Children's names: Signature: .~ d~ ::~F/~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ffl. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-I 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES., please check below all the statements you agree with: ~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~,~- ~ ('~T~ Children's names: ~ ~2~ I~ I ff-~ ~ Your children's classroom #s:. ~l:~w~ Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES ['-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [;:] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~]4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['-15. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~JYES (Check one) ENo If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: ~11. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /~_.~G= L t~ Signature: ~ Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: [ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonslxate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES [~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: ,1~ 1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ,~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES [-INO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: c~/J ~'-Z-//VcC7 Children's names: ~'TTr~ a~t '--~'~ Your children's classroom #s: ! ct Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. rq o If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: .School children's safety. · Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 42'3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["l 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Par'king Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~Es DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are tD'ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: [.//t C ~0 £f&- '~t Your children's classroom #s: t/3 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our'6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent s~atus for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [ ws D NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/XVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the statements you a~ee with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /~. Signature~ Children's names: Jt_/..~ _~Z. !~l !~_]_~a ~.~ Your children's classroom #s: /~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [--] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ii School children' s safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. {~]YES NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ,~}q~'~ ~/( ~.,t-~4.'~{~ f/l(~tl~4 Children's names: ~lq¢,~ ,~ /j -- ¢~ ' j , Signature: ~fF~.~L- ~4~ Your children s classroom #s: i/p ~ Please return this form:/o your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [-~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children' s safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. BYES I-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:~ Signature: ~ Children' s names:~, Your children's classroom #s:~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aaree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. '~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. i H elps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]YES NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: J~[1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~/c~ ~ Your children's classroom #s:/q/ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent s~atus for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 3 .~minUpport the Faria School Site Council's request to Cupertino City a permanent the Council for ute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~'1. School children's safety. ~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 1~'3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ,~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-[ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]'YE S (Check one) ENO If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Signature: {.-) ' ~ z~...---' Children's names: [J~-' Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent stares for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~jmute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ YES ~ NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~41 Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~[7~ES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~. ~i/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please prim: Signature: Children's names:.f-~l_~_.~. & ~yr'~..~ C~et~ Your children's classroom #s: [~) ~_ ~ ( % Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. A William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: }iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fa_da. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~14. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian compl.eting this letter: Sign' amre: .,q~~/~//...c~. ,. "? Your children's classroom/ts'._ __/,' (//Please return this fo[m to your child's teacher by Fndav, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [-'] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~1. School children's safety. ~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~]~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: 221IAVe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: t~_~!l-~ ~D~ ~ Signature: Children's names: A ~gf~J I) Your children's classroom #s: ] ¢ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES ~] NO (Check one) · If answered YES, please check beloW all the important reasons you agree with: ~[1. School children's safety. ~3[~2: Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 0S. Other Cfill in): [}~ p,~,~?~v~ _n,) ~ tad,/' ~' ~t:L$, 1/We will comply with ali the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES (Check one) ENO If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Pleaseprint: ~ , ~[~OJ~fl[~ ~)9~ t Signature: /~. SL,~,x~ f--&~' Children's ~;+afl,,j _ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~//YE S DNO (Check one) If answered YES, Please check below all the important reasons you agree with: .School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. D 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~S ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: ~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I'] 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Signat e: X0 ' Children's names: ~-~¢_ 7 c ~ Your children's classroom #s: \ '~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. IfWe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino CiD' Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~t~S [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~. School children's safety. ~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or [~.H dismissal times. elps ensure emergency ve.hicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 2. 1/We will comply with ali the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD· Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ENO (Cbeck one If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~,ree with: ~. ii/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. /We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~'~'rn ~' ~t ~. Children's names: CAe ~tO~/~ Your children's classroom Please return this form to your childTM teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers l,%Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~//YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the imvortant reasons you aeree with: · School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times.  H elps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. Other (fill in): e?~e (9/: 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when eithgr dropping off or pi~cking up my child/children from Faria. x~YES [-~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aoree with: ~21. i/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. /We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:. ~'A~_~:.u?,3/~ L i r3~ K 14 1~ ff SignatUre: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children snames: ~e~qf~ ! ~ ~1,v3 ~ .- Your children's classr6om #s: ~--0 .'~ [ ~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: }. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~'~31 Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [3 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [35. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you a~ree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ~J-~ ~ ~ Children's names: C d( ~}r//~ Your children's classroom #s: ,¢( Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. J/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~S ~'~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 2.. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. by traffic congestion. ~4. Helps ensureemergencyvehiclesaren°thinderedpt-~qE~''d !![' ~. Other (fill in): fDC need~ O- parkir ? /'/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino Cit'3' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~ES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: .will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent oNg. uardian completing this letter: Please print: .~l'Vt't.~ ~O,F/V~O,~ Children's names: aW tg_.q]q t Signature: Your children's classroom #s: ~-~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Fana s continue good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~i! School children' s safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~'5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that bloqks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: [~Q)fi~ ~ tl~, ~xl~ Ir~) Signature: ' /~L - ' ~/-J' Children's names: ~ t ! l0 ?)ID B t ~; Yourchildren'sclassro0rn~: ,,fl'~'l 4t; Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demons~xate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [3No(Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during anival or dismissal times. D 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in): I/XVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~]YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES. vlease check below all the statements you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. IfO/e will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: 2(/r~ [<c, ~, ~ ~ i Children's names: DF). D; 12 (~? -~)% Your children's classroom #s: /~ Signature: Please return this¥orm to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be fonvarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. gYES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~[~i School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~/4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in):. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. (Checkone If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you aeree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ZH OA/~ ~// J/.~O0 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: /C>~'/'~-~._ Your children's classroom #s: William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faxia SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. X~/YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aeree with: ~. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~(. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. []~2. I/We will be considerate when residents axe trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: .~}~i]Ql~l ~ [/11~/3~ Children's names: (~(/~L~/q~ ~ Signature: , . _~//~/~ . _. Your children's classroom tls: ] 0,, ID Please return this ~ to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. eYES ~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: i'School children's safety. ~ Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~'~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: ele~seprint:' ?t. Yl'~'FPc¢~I~, l'~cW'~'¥~ Children'snames:'gt'l~r4~3~. '~r'J~'/r Signature: ,k~x ' o~...-. Your C~ldren's cl~sroom ~s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupettino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino CiD' Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. . ?3iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and at dismissal times Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ' [~/4.dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-I 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria.. ENO Checkone If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with: 21I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~7x~3 P P~ ~CIS~AO ~ 0 Signature: ~~¢_~ Children's names: ~ ~Ll'vl.a Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridaxh November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minme parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~/YES D NO (Check one) ' If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: 21I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian comp. leting this letter: Please print: ~lt ~. ~_..[I t~'/3 Signature: ~ Children's names: ~:~' Your children's classroom #s:. } ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Fa_da Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. IFvVe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~/1. School children's safety. 331Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. · Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules /YEeithe~r dropping off or pi_eking up my child/children from Faria. S ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES. ¢lease check below all the statements you aeree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: Piekse/return th~s form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-mlnute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES 0 NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safe~. 'i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~]t3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home duringarrix;al or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. F-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Farla Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: L,~.& 'i~¥~ Children's names: ~a ¢ot, l .~ ~ ~-t~t~, Your children's classroom #s: / ~:~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES DNO (Checkone) · If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. - ~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal time~ at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~]4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES I-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: eleaseprint: Md&l/ _t~I4td~.~tq Signature: f.~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. ChildreWs names :>~z~ bt~ ;n Your children's classroom William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. IFvVe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~S [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check beloTM all the important reason~ you agree with: ~. ~chool children's safety. ess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. elps Faria'~neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: rleasep nt: Si ,a e: q/ -e6 Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: [ ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November l8,2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: }iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~JYES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ,36~/qfl ~ ~}~ /L7 Children's names: ~//r/?e C/~t'¢t7 Signature: ~~.~A-_,.~ Your children's classroom #s: / ~ ~Plei' fo4t se return this o your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~}! School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ~-~/fi--~Dg V~JgAq ~/ Children's names: ~,'t? _ - )~ ~tTV~A~ / Your children's classroom #s: ~..C Please return this form to yo~child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. DYES [~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~Alq3-,a, Nlp~ ~/~HRPr Signature: ~x~~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: CH~P,,O ~EMROie Your children's classroom #s: I 2... William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Fa_da Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. 1~,4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in):~ I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ('~//~/~/~/ ~-?,/~ ~) Signature: ~'> ~ .?~ ~:~ fi~" '~' Please re~n t~s form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~6:L~r Your children's classroom #s: / William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent stares for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers IfWe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. f~YES ~] NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~i! School children' s safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Fada's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or /~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. /~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: .~'/ ?2 fiqA~ ~ I y~ ,i £~q.~ ~,A ~7 ..... ~x/tj ~ Your children's classroom #s: ] ') Signature: ~.qa~ ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Fada Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: I~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):_ 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parl~.'ng Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Children's names: (~;],,4:i~i,:,. Your children's classroom #s: {2-- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academies Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~tl. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~13. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~5. Other (fill in):. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:! V / Ma, Signature: ~ Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: ,~ ~' Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~ES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: . . School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or [~.H dismissal times. elps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~S ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~) e~' L Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22, 2002. II II William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES UNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 121 I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ,~EkD~[~Oa ~o~ Signature: ~/-hA~ '~'f~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~'~'C~/~m g ,Ju~s~-ne [/¢4 Your children's classroom #s: ~ ~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ii School children' s safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ]--] 5. Other (fill in):_ 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. 92. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~ ,' oft ~t~t Your children's classroom #s: / 55 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in thc streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~i! School children' s safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-I 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ES NO (Check one) answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: 121 I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Children's names: Please print: .~ Signature: II~ Pl~s~ return this form to your ~hild's teacher by Fri~ Nowmb~r 2~ ~002, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. IFvVe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~[. School children's safety. t[~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ,,.[~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ]-'] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and-with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. \~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~l?~ WI~ 5~.,~/l&£Ttk~t~k Children's names: [x~i~I~}'t ~,V Signature: ~ ~~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES D NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. i H elps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with thc Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: eleaseprint: ~O.~/~.t~t [~ ~CkC~r~n. Children's names: /~10~ vT/L Your children's classroom #s: / t~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. DYES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 1. School children's safety. 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES D NO (Check one) .~ If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: .~ ~ (.~ ~x~ff t,{. Signature: ~ l -2-~""~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ ~ m (~ ~lease ret~t/u/rn this form to yo~ child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 21School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-I 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. IFvVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~S DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~7>,~ eq M~o~ Signature: Children's names: ~-~ ~ fr~o_loC~J~.rt~ Your children's classroom #s: --/ K Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Fafia family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent te parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3. School children's safety. Less overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ,~44. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/Vqe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. G( s DNO (Check one If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. /We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: 7'lellO6tt~ll/~ /~A/VI ok4 t~ Signature: /b'f '~/4~x~'g~_ ~..,, Children'snames: P-odhrrv,,J /14o ,'cJmrO Your children's classroom #s: t~/Iq./19 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridaw November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES DNO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-15. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: x~'~4~ ~[[~- ~ "('~q~-~/{~Bx~ Signature: ~ Children's names: ~ ~r3~ Your children's classroom #s: [ O Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/VVe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES DNO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aeree with: iiSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in):. o IP~e will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~-~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~J-~'~,~X~ ~,'a~ ~ ~l;~ t~l~ Children's names: ~g~ Signature: //~ ~'~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minnte parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Fada's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ii Schoolchildren's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~J4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. o 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~,1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: eleaseprint' ~J-Tz~,~ff~-I~ ~--/7/f~ Children's names: 7it/~'~ Signature: k,~/( ~ ~---'-- Your children s classroom #s: I0 (_,,Please return this form to your child s teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union SchooiDistrict Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Cotmcil. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~]~ES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~[~. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S [-~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~l)t~Y.t'll;'l ~l,U[~Uh4Otg!~SI4-) Signature: Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. lit 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /~H~3 t-!A ~-,~,~;C3'i~ d ~,AVI~-}t~ ~-¢'Av'4t''/ · Children's names: Signature: ~ ;~,~g Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~-]YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below ali the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent o[ guardian completing this Pleasepfint: ~a~¢x° l-[owle Signature: ~¢O-~-~-~_a~'~_ letter: Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: / O Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. l~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):_ I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~)~YES [~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: E. c_ ~ GI off ~ '~ Signature: ~ '~%'~,~" Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: I0 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: i School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~/YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with thc Cupertino City Council: Name of Fafia parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: J~&CHANA SH/t g,~ 6 Signature: x~t~x~ ~ Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-I 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~/YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:~O~L x/a~) Children's names: .~'od~/ bo.) ~.o~ Your cMldren's classroom ~s: /~ Signa~e: / ~lease return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. DYES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: i' School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~1/4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping offor picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~'~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 12I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: /~M'~ L~ U/'3 (~ Children's names: ~Jic/~o/as ~vv~ ~/~. ~x~ Your children's classroom #s: /O Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. [~.2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~.4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-I 5. Other (fill in):. I/We wiU comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES ["~NO (Check one) If answered YES. t)lease check below all the statements you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please prim: /~'1/{ ~,~ ~ b~ ~ ~ ~, Signature: ~/~.,,-~.~ ¢'~"~D Children's names: ~a~,~, °~t'~'~ ~'3 Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. i H elps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. f YES DNO (Check one) answered YES~ please check below all the statements you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~c~[TDq ~/60~,v~ Children's names: ~-~'/ /~/V3 Signa~e: , ~ Your c~ld en's cl~sroom ~s: ~ Please ~urn this f~your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES DSO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ,12. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~'4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [3 5. Other (fill in): 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino Cit3' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. J~] 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria~-<.~ arent or guard,dian completing this letter:c//~%~-/I//'''~/'~r Please print: f~ ~ Children's names: Signature: ~.-~'~'~'~~- _ Your children's classroom#s: 'lease return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. S YES ~NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-q 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. I~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [3 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Par'king Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~]YES I-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you aeree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: 5~¢¥*,C', r~ ~ ~ Signature: Children's names: ~O dy -~ ~e~7 /~)~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ ~ '* ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~/YES ['-] NO (Check one) If answeied YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with:  School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or 4 dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~/myEinute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. S [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you aeree with: ~32i School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ]/4 dismissal times. · Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/XVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules sither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: V(c.~ 0'~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~l. School children's safety. [~/2. Less oxrerall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 4.. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiW Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~'YES DSO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: .IAVe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: '"/'~q ~ 7Ir 6i ~'--- Signature: ~'~ '{~ .. Children'snames: yCtmt ro. ~Cf~ er'x.t c~ Your children's classroom #s: ~] Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ENO (Checkone If answered YES. ¢lease check below all the important reasons you agree with: .ehool children's safety. ss overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. elps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~J dismissal times. [5:[4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in):. 2. IF~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: ~.fl/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~/41£1g ~/~ J'~t/tDK~)~ Children's names: /~~. Your children's classroom #s: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ YES ~-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aeree with: i' School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules ~'hen either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are tr~ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Pleasepfint: ~//o,r~c/c~r~ca. /~/c~,'~ Signature: "¥ 35~(,',tr ~/, Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino CiW Council for a permanent 37y~nute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. S g NO (Check one) If answered YES, l~lease check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~.~ School children's safety. ~./~ess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~]/3c. ..Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their hcme during arrival or ~ dismissal times. . J~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestmn. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules er dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: ~ l~i~e will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. e will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fafia parent or guardian completing this letter: Please p nt: Signature: Children's names: i_;J). ~ }~-~ ],'¢/~Z/J~-/ Your children's classroom #s: d] Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [-'~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: . School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 31 Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~]4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. I~/YES [']NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: .~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neig~h,~or's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are tr) ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~t4_ Children's names: Signature: ' ~ Your children's classroom #s: Pie to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~3YES ~'~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~,ree with: ~] 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [J 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES DNO (Check one) If answered YES. nlease check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ?~e~/-/~' Signature: Please return tlff~firm to your child's Children's names: ~/~7 ~/~/~-q Your children's classroom #s: .,9 teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Fafia family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Farla Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:~No ~fl~3 lq/3 gf.t ~'17 t~.l~ ! Children's names: /~/q ~ ](~F I~ 0/~ I ~ ~,xc,.t4.~.. I. '~j.. j r4 0' Yom children's classroom #s' Signature:q , ....... t~_t~t d2. ~4._. · · ~ .U . our child's teacher b-'Friday November 22 Please return this ~orm to y > ~ ~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES [~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you aeree with: .School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules ither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S I-]NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the statements you a~ree with: .IFCJe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ~~ ¢_./ Your children s classroom #s: 7 Please refsrn th~s form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus Scl Cupertino Union School Distric Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-momh pilot project for School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In prep City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working coot Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers inute parking, and the Faria n for an upcoming Cupertino finute parking zone, we need vely with our neighbors, the h will be forwarded to the 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino £~ty Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YEs NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. · Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. i 'fas DNO (Check one) nswered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City CouneU: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please prim: /~ 7'/ct,) /Y~c~ r o~_ Signature: Children's names: ...~~/7/4~~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav, November 22~ 2002. William Fari~ Acad~ic~ Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. DYES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: i' School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times.  Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. i Other (fill in):. 2. I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~11. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ,-.~'~',~ Signature: Children,snames:_~'ddZ';~.~// ~'/ Your children's classroom #s: ~2 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. x~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: . School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 31 Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ]-] 5. Other (fill in): 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: x~lI[~2 IFqv'e will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. x I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~J ,. ~/[5~ Signature: ..~'~ , Children's names: Y..'~m~ y Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child s teacher b3 Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~[YES B NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: alSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. · Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. 6. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~. Other (fill in): ~'equov~e~ _~ 4-~.e~ ~cb~[ · 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. nNo (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aaree with: ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~'2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fma p~ent or ~d~ comple~g ~s le~er: Please print: Signature: Children's names: _~cOX.-tY Your children s classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. Dolly Travers 1. ID~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~ES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~ES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~'~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: eleaseprint: ~gtgF]/ra~9~F/~ ~1' 7 ~c //v b-Jt //}££ #/ /v ~ /~'q/Chil dren'~ z~t/K's names: ~ [} t~ ~ fJ ~ f / /V ffr l// Signature: //f~/~_ ~,~'//v,,O~.~t-4,?q~ ~ Your children's classroom #s: ? Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 3.0-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working co6peratively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~ES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 2School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. D 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in):. o I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino Cit-)' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~S ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~,ree with: [~I. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Piea~e~st any~ concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or' "guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~.~/~C-~ Qk_).~ Children's names: &~ Signature: .L ~, [o~ ~ Your children's classroom #s: P rm to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively vdth our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 31i School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fada. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. "~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria.  S DNO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the statements you aeree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ._~t4~'{~/)/"//~/~/~/ Signature: ~//. ~--~ ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: Your children's classroom tls: William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. EYES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~1. School children's safety. [~'2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 1~'3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~'YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES. vlease check below all the statements you aeree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ ~,g ~d. "~R,~ 4 Children's names:~ Signamre:~ Your children's classroom #s: t7 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/V~e support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YEs ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules W~E'sther dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: $-[6¢'A~g 'OAt9 Your children's classroom #s: -7 0- ~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way thxough our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES ['~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 31School children's safely. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~ dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/XVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. i YES DNO (Check one) f answered YES~ please check below all the statements you aeree with: }IAVe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa.da parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~k~x~ - C_-IX~,~ ) ~cco Children's names: ,~3-o v~,Ct~ ~ Signature: 6(,x,o 51.;xDx.~q-~t?~,J Your children s classroom #s: 7 r\. I/ - 7lease return', ,orm to child's ,cachet hy rida,', ovemher William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: . School children's safety. 31Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~/4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. (Check one> If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you aeree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: 5 B/,4 /v~/13>~5/~.~t Children's names: /q~,~AJ~ f/9~_P/frr,/ Signature: /c~~ 5;/~.-~L. Your children's classroom #s: 7 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. q~/YES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~. School children's safety. ~'2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. {~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. '~/4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [ go (Check one If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: _~1. I/We will not park in a way a neighbor's driveway. that blocks ~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~1~ Ui [- r~ ~-'~ ~ C~ %1 ' Signature: %~,~ (~ ~-~ ' Your children's classroom #s: z:~l~' .~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. E%s ]NO Checkone) If answered YES, please cheek below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aaree with: 21I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Ts Ir~ ~/'L~O Children's names: ~~c~/)/9 5~'~ Please return th~s form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations-* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-'] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~--Ogotq '[~t,/~ Your children s classroom #s: teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aeree with: }]School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~13. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home dur_ing arrival or dismissal times. ~[4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-15. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino Cit3' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~-YE S [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: "[~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. '~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are ID'ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: J~(C ,J4d'OrO ~] Please return this formff~your child's Children's names: ~tC~ (,4dv~3(~ Your children's classroom #s: '7 teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES DNO Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3 1 School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~/4 dismissal times· · Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): o I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ( h cko.e If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria paren[ or guardian completing this letter: · : Pleas:;!tur2 t'h~i form to your child's teacher by ~riday, November 21, 2072. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Fafia's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Couhcil; - Dolly Tmvers 1. ~/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~S DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: L~. School children's safety. ~L,~I Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. ~/We will comply with all the conditions as. set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested '~30-minute parking zone, with the Califorma Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ ["]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: ' ~'~. lAVe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. L~'2. iIAVe will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Signature: A ,~ Children's names: Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent slams for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES ['~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ I. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Fafia's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with fac California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES ["]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with: 1~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their .arive~tays. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino Cit3' Council: Name of Fafia parent or guardian completing this letter: Please Signature: Your children's classroom #s: r~[_ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida,h November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the follo~ving letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~. LHChOol children's safety. ess overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. elps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. H dismissal times. elps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules W~E'Sther dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: i/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. /We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /~_ ~t' ~-~ ~ signature:~Z~~~ Your children's classroom #s: ? Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Fa_da Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: gl. School children's safety. ['] 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-14. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. '~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please pri~X~x~--[ i ~ . ~ f d 6k~- ' Children's na~es ~ ~)/r"f}q &~. Signamre.k~J')~~ ~. Your children's classr°°m #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School Bistrict Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. res No (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. D 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ["~reS I-]NO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the statements you aeree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: Signature: .,~- Children's names: ~-¼C'~ (-'(x ;~',( ~ Your children's classroom #s: r~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way thxough our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino CiD' Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. .~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~[~1. School children's safety. . Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. . . Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. '~. Helps ensure eme_rgenc~ vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~. Other (fill in): ~ ~ ~ ~1-/'~ ~~r~L~ 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping offor picking up my child/children from Faria. ~>~YES ['-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ]iI/~Ve will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing th-is letter: Please print: t~,~[~l[~%~Children's names: Signature:~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ]School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ["] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in): o I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. IFWe will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fafia parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /~/ -- ~x.)~_~)d //, ~ Children's names: ~(~_D"~ ~/~ Silage: / x Yo~ c~ldren's cl~sroom ~s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6~month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [-] I. School children's safety. ]iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ["] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~JYES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I-I 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please prim: /~O~D~ VCO[ f) ~ ~/t,~]W~Dc3'~[~ Signature: Crc o~l u3 ~/r£,4~,3Dxx~C~ Your children's classroom #s: '7 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: I'~6qQi:/¢6~ (II£])bCU?cT{[? William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minnte parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: .School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ifES E NO (Check one) answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We wilt not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~5.~,-~ I~B~ ~ A ~ ~1/~ Signature: ,~/-C~--~--- Children's names: G0 k~ / [~7~}/ Your children s classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. E] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ .. , [~5. Other (fill in): ~,~,xls /x~x~ ~ ~ ~'~,,,~'~ce c~5~'~' c~fl/'~ c/u/dCe~,~ 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. j~YES (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~x4 C ~Ot 'r~ Signature: '~t ~ ~ fL~ f,l ~. ~~ Children,s nates: ~(K~'~PJ~ ~O~ [{~ ~(~ Your children s classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~/1. School children's safety. ~]~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["15. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules E'sther dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: l/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: --~-~,C~ \/% (.7 ~/~ ~ Signature: Children's names: Please return this Your children's classroom #s: (e9 form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in thc streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~1. School children's safety. ["] 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~ ~ i["~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [-] 1. School children's safety. ~_ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ['-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are tD'ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or gu/~ian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children' s names: ~[~[~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ..School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. O 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~ dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: X~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~OQ~ ~'~-~--~ signature ~(~/~ ~-'-~,~,-C-~24~ . Children' s names: ~,~' ~'~3~0~<g~-~ Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations: We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. j~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you a~,ree with: 0~'1. School children's safety. v~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ["] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~[~5.[2 4. Other Helps (fillensurein):em'e'rgenqY, sa~ v~h.~_ ~s ~,~ot u hindered/.,TO~ AjobY ~-*~ 'traffic congestion. 2. I/We wiU comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~ES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you a~ree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: .': /~,ff? /~.dq~',~J~,b-~ Signature: ~, ~I~/~ / Children's names:~~ [ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~fES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ,, 1. School children's safety. 33 Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or [~/4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules W~y either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: 5 Signature: Children's names: .~)~{~q .~0J~ Your children's classroom #s: ¢ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES D NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~,1. School children's safety. 42. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fada. ~,3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. gYES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ,4n o..lo. Children's names: D'~l''g' ~'& Signature:~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. / ~]YEs D NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~'J,. School children's safety. .. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~]~.. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES [-~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~[~.i i/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children' s~ nam '~'-~~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ YES [-~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 21.. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. O. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. t~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. V-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/'VVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules W~E'sther dropping off orpicking up my child/children from Faria. ., [~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~1~ I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. 4~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: , '-~d~7 [/~/F')~ Signature: ~_ J~ ~1 ~ase return this btm ~our child's Children's names: ~ 0_~"'O~ - Your children s classroom #s: teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: .School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~/ dismissal times. k~f4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules W~yEeither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2~.. ii,We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: (~[ 7-A ~ V,q ~ ~ ~) ~ ~ib 1 Children's names:~~ ~ i Signature: ~'~. ' Your children's classroom #s: (O ~ease return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: .. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or 4.dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules w~yEeither dropping offor picking up my child/children from Faria. S E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: .i/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: xf~.~'J- ~'-/"),t, tC., ~h~'~t'/~ Children's names: ~'d'gg//'~.J Your children's classroom #s: Signature: y~ ~'' /7 . ' V... Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~] YES [--] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~] 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:~ Children's names:~ · S~gnature. Your children's classroom #s: ~' Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES ["] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: .i ' School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or )~ dismissal times. 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. lS (Check one) DNO If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 121 I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ?gDf~]~ ~/g?TIc~ N Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida~i~ ~ovember 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YE S ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~'4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~5. Other (fill in): 1¢55 ~o l[~zf.&~ 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ t A o ~> [/,.I (~ C~J/q/q L~ Signature: Children's names: Er; C[~. LiA _ ]~_~'~ ).-,Ic~ ~.~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-momh pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~5. Other (fill in): X_ e_~, r~c..k t~.r~ ~,~-.x, c~x'~o[ ~-ov,c, ~'~5 I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiO' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree w/th: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: IV~ n ~ x~ C- o ~-. ¥ ~ e.~" ,xc, ! Signature:r'~x~.. D ~t' Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida% November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~ r,~ r~ ~ v, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES ["]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: }School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ["~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: iIFxVe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: bJ~ll~e_ Signature: Children's names: ~' ~ ~-~n La.; ~LLL~ fM Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES 0NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aeree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at an'ival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in):. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with: ~]_1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~¢~)Ce' ~ Your children's classroom #s: o~' William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Doily Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [YES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ]School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. []] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~].YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino CiD' Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: [)f/x/# ~ Signature: ~¢r~ f~ Children's names: Your children's classroom tls: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aeree with: 4."School children's safety. · Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ]-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules ither dropping offor picking up my child/children from Faria. S ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ,_3 ~.VL ~-~ ~6~/ Children's names: ~Ld~/~ (/d Sienature- //~ ..~ [/~d //~ ~ ~ Your children s cl~sroom ~s: ~ ~l,,s, ~urn t~ ,o ~our child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Doily Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~S ~NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you a~,ree with:  S chool children's safety. 3. L ess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S ['-]NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the statements you agree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~/~7'-/--~/~ 7-~?/--/7~ Children's names: ._~t~tCff Signature: ~tS~A~ ~ ~7 Your children's classroom #s:~'25~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent  nute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. S ["] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~ree with: 331 School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. · Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [3 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino Cit3' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules ither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2 I I/We will not in that blocks a neighbor's driveway. park a way I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /D~t'~/o Children's names: ~{L/~r'/f~ iL4 Your children's classroom #s: -[-- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 1 g, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I]We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aeree with: ~ I. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fa.da. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [3 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ['~YE S UNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:/~,~3r! b/t~A/~ ~ T'¢~2c/~? A'rr/ Children's names: /~/(9/7'm/;~ry~ ~ Signature: ~~n~ Your children's classroom #s: .~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demons~'ate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [ go If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 4 Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules -,~yEeither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S [~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: A21 I/We will not park in a that blocks a neighbor's driveway. way I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Falda parent or guardian completing this letter: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ,"-~'&~-~ ~n~ Your children's classroom #s: :~ ~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need ),our support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~ES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: L; ~'~ Children' s names: 3'(i] ce, ~z l~o ~ ~ Your children's classroom #s: ,~' Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations*. We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. '~/YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 32. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ;[~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. J~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: [~ ~[~' ~ ]x~j O~l~-c~ ~ c~ Co~L Children's names: ~V~//I Signature: ~././~f~_t~ ")Q//~_ ~aAA/~--~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Farla Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ! Checkone> If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~./School children's safety. , [~/Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~/J. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ,_~,~4. H~' dismissal times. elps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. O 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules w~other dropping off orpicking up my child/children from Faria. ~,~d!ES ENO (Check one)" If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /-J,g}~l Ad/ .~&-TLt~ Signature: /~ Z,,.~' ~ ~'~ Children's names: ~/}r'')~p~ ~v' oC~Ft--O tL Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 1 §, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Fada's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. []4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. E] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: [~f. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. , ~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: H Signature: ~ Children's names: i'x,41~-bH~O h4 ITf/A-J~- Your children's classroom #s: ~- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ YES ~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [3 1. School children's safety. [3 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [3 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times.  Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. i Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES (Check one) ENO If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~----~a~ Signature: ~ Children's names: ~O--~'lf/'c.~-.. /---? ~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. IF'We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES [~ NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [-] 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~'3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ZYES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: S natu : ; Children's names: ~//g ~/C e~/'~ ~7 Your children's classroom #s: ~" Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. l ~-~ YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~1. School children's safety. [ii. re. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~],/3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules w~n either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [~NO (Check one) 'If answ, ered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ]/t2] I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria par,e..~ or guardian c~mpleting this letter: Please print: ., 'k/c/. ~ Signature: ': '~'~'~//k- [~''// Children's names: [k,./X( d~ Your children's classroom #s: '~ ~ P~ease return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations: We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanem status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES [--] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in):. 2. IfvVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~)0,o cker, ER c~t~ Signature: ?A~ C, >'V Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: d Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. iYES NO (Check one) f answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. J~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: '~f/~ £J{~P'J Signature: ~/~~ Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: ~ r ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. N [-] 4 Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. i Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria.  YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: }I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: [3 £kT_~,~q ,,tMh Signature: (~ { ~/~ 4att t _---. Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: EM.~4~:Ir ~'IF~Gi William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way tbxough our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES DNO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. i-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/XVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~-~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: M k ~-I l~/, ~ ~ ~, £ Signature: /54 ~ ~-~ ~-- Children's names: . J t; ~ ~ A Your children's classroom #s: /~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES ENO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-I 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ,.ff~'D [~1 '~- ('~ O Signature: ~ ~ Children's names: ,~'~{~kO,~ ~7*b~c~ Your children's classroom #s: c~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [-~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: [~-l~-~-~xJ/~'~(At~ Children's names: APlT{ Signature: tx ~, Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please yo child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Farm s continue good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YEs ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [7] 1. School children's safety. [3 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [3 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion· [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~.. i/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. /We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~v~-~ ~[3~ (~. ~:~. ~ *~ Signature:,~,~ ,: ~ .~' · ~ ,~ ,-~ _.f_ Please return this form~your child's Children's names: p ~'. ~ ': v ¥ ~ Your children's classroom #S: -q · ~- teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Fana s continued goo faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/tYES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: .. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. 51 Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered ~y,,graffic congestion. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~~ ~L~//~- Signature: //"~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~ ~L-~- Your children's classroom #s: ~/L William Faria Academics Flus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~1. School children's safety. ~[2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~]'~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergen% vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~/¢i Other (fill in): ?re~3 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. DYES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 21I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ,~',,~ C/-~ Signature: ,_-~,.~n~---~_ ~ Children's names: /~;eec~,~ Your children's classroom #s: g-~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida% November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~ES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [-] 1. School children's safety. [~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-13. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: t~i~:cvov~c,~,l/xc~. ['~' ~ ' Children's names: / c(x ~,~ Signature: ~,, l,~/~/~2-~rl\~]~ '--~ :~ Your children's classroom/ts: z~f Please return this Porto to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ['] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. D 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~/ES ['-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: T'f'~' ~ Signature: re~-e~' ~c Children's names: ~fg~t_~ )(~(A_ Your children's classroom #s: '~/~- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Acadi~mic-s Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. /~ YES [-'] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ?School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): o I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. []YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~-~ ~£r~'\C C Children's names: ~ ;CIF,~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teache~ by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES E NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ii School children' s safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. o I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Please print: Signature: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Children's names: ~ra,x~ Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~yinute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ES [~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~fl. School children's safety. ~]'2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~/4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES., please check below all the statements you agree with: K~i I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: '~/~/0 ~ ~P ~-\[A(~ lAOs Signature: //~ ~A~ o Children's names: d~) 1~. ~'~ ~4/I. Your children's classroom #s: ]-~ - ~ Please r~turn this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 21School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: I(~ t tO~{'' t'{/~O Signature~ Pl~eturn this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ]~p~r~ Your children's classroom #s: William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]'YES ~-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ,[~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. {~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~] !- I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. {~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: pleasepfint: ¢1c,_~- ~ ~&ix h,I ~/'[~ f :~[Sj~' Signature: a~ ~, k.~t. Children's names: \/t I_~',! F~' ,j~) rx (_.V_-~ Your children's classroom #s: [ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~//YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: [~. School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~i Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with ali the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S []NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~- VX'~ ~-,[ ~. Children's names: L%C 6~. ~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our &month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~] YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3iSchool children's safety. Less overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria.. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules ss'hen either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria.  YES ~NO (Check one) f answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria par.eft or guardian completing this letter: Please print: .~]t~ ~/~ Signature: ~ L_ x~<~ _ Children's names: C/~ ~-ff~'ff' ~ Your children'~ classroom #s: / Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aoree with: }iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. lf~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with: 2IfWe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ~ ~qJ~t~ Children s names: ~Oc~v~ Please return th~ form to yo~ child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonslxate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~(YES ~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~1. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~.4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1AVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~[YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: ~] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~[~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~/~;I; ~i'~ Your children's classroom #s: J" Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~~rES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. ~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~[~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [2[4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [--[NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: [31. qF~Ve will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: 'D,> ~4) Signature: ~' Children's names: kAS ~ Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. V~illiam Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Farla. ,~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, Please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~] 1. School children's safety. ?2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. -[-]5'~4: Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~"~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: · ~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. x.~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: Iq~:kmA- _%~-~,~.r~ A- Your children's classroom #s: [ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~/~yEinute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. S ~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. · Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times· [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-I 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules ,~ither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you a~ree with: .IfWe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signamre~ ~ ~.~._ Children's names: ~ et~¢_~ C/4x~ Your children's classroom #s: .5. Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ONO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [3 1. School children's safety. .~] 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. I-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-]5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: { 1 Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-rninute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be lo,yarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]/YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3 School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehlele Code, and with the }:aria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~ES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: . I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. , I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their dri~ eways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~' O~OS ~c~O,~ Signature: ~ dy ~]~, Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friflav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ,~ Jq~o Your children's classroom #s: William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [']NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ["] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["]5. Other (fill in): 2. I/'~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~/,2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ ,' ~_~.t~ Children's names: ~/9 Signature: '~.~ ~ Your children's classroom #s: "i~l/ease return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~] YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: I-11. School children's safety. I~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 0 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~]YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~,1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ]L(/4f,/~ ~-~ ~ (~-'-;r~x'/'q ( Children's names: //~Fd',~ ~7~q~/ Signature: d/(]//~ ~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please retuffa this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: 1~ 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~5. Other (fill in): ~t,9~ Y'ed. ut~O_ ~ ~o~l~.'b"o~ c~a.~Tto{ ~-~: /_wt.-. &~d..'{-h~-O- ~ I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. Igqv'e will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: 7Y E-Al F--T-~/y- Children's names: /b'[ [ C H,~ /_.- Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~//YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: i School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. · Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or [~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in):. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~'/YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aaree with: ]I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: %~-~;aa Signature: Children's names: ~i~t) ~ ~~ ' 2 Please rein this form to'our child's teacher by Fndav,-- November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~7]YES ['-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~] 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. 94. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. IFvVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with: ~] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. 92. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /~;q"]_ ~'h~ ~_ ['~}A Signatur~~J~/ ~ Children's names: ~-~You~ children's classroom #s: 2_ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [2~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~. School children's safety. 31Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindeaed by traffic congestion. ~'5. Other (fill in): Gi~c~ OMkLtt. t~ oJn e)~xr~ ~ ~ rd.c~tr~ aa~d ~ojoxtx ~ I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth l~y the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested. 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES ['-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements ¥0u agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~'2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you wouhl like shar~[ ~'ith the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: PAL~&X/I q'o~L~'~.ll Children's names: 'bi~¢. , ~ILeu. Your children's classroom #s: I~ :z Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ['-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): w I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~1-6~r'l ~ ~ ~,1 ~ ~ Signature: ' I/'L~. ' Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~oa-~'r~ · v. Your children's classroom #s: ~oo~ qh~ I William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. l/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets udjacent to Faria. ~3"YES 0NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 21School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fafia. 03. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. x~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. I-]No (Cbeck one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~o-~')~'-~~'~- ~05~'''' Signature: ff-~ C~' Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~/c[~ 3(3g~' Your children's classroom #s: ~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~'/YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~. School children's safety. 32Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria'$ neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ff, ( he kon ) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: _Please print: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ,P?~JP~ ~ /Vt e~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ '/~ ( William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. 331Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. {~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~qYES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are t;3'ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~ea/0,.~ g/_. ¢v,o{a._ )~ i'o,. Your children's classroom #s: I & [/'~- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: }. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~J4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES., please check below all the statements you a~ree with: ~] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. 92. I/We will he considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: C ~v~ ~ o 0 Signamre: ~~t~_ ~ '~.,/ Please returl~ this form to your child's Children's names: Your children's teacher by Frida,h November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~[4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion· ["] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. T S ENO (Check one) answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Your children's classroom #s: ,~ -~, ! Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES ~NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aeree with: ~] 1. School children's safety. ~3[~21 Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. 94. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [-~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~-tz ~q ~- bOcc Signature: ,~'Cc~- L<gc,_ Children's names: ~, 'l l t)L't" Your children's classroom #s: I Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino Ci~~ Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. . ,~"YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~]"1. School children's safety. ~'2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. q~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. L.~'YE S DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with: 2I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: k/fitS ~,q L~ a~,q'C, Aw~f~ Signature: Children's names: ~Ok/AqL/ t /~ Your children's classroom #s: /? 8 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~1. 'School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria.~ ~] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~,4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Signature: /--~E/fr~ ~.--~ Children's names: Your Children's classroom #s: [ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union gchool District Dear Faria Parents, November 1 g, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~rYES [']NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: '61.-- School children's safety. - ~3: Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~/4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in):. 2. I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you a~ree with: .. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: P~I~x~}~.~ '~g Children's names: --~'~ Signature: _~¢~,--~_1'~-~_ %'--~ ~* Your children's classroom #s: Please re~urn this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES DNO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ii School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Fada's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. '~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [-1NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: }I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are tD'ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: , ~;~&~tt 2 mleaseprint: ~-/-d'~,,/g 6~£/~/r Children snames: ~ :~d/~7 ("n~'~f Signa~e: ~ ~f . Yom c~l&en's cl~sroom ~s: ~/ / . Piea~return t~rm to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. IFvVe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aeree with: 1. School children's safety. 31Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. · Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules W~y either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~ ;O, rl Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~-~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ['] 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. IFC/e will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:-~a~tt,~'O '%~fe Signature: ~6mt~J-o, *'~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~1rlO~ ~3~/ O E Your children's classroom #s: / William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I~ support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES D NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~-4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in): 2. I~W~) will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30,~ninute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. i YES D NO (Check one) answered YES. nlease check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ,~ t3~ ~-~ LI ~' Signature: [~/~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ ~ I Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~ES ~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~,4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['-15. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [iTYES DNO (Check one) answered YES, please check below ali the statements you a~ree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ,. [ _ . vi Your children s classroom #s: -" Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way ttu'ough our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES DNO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-'[ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. .~]YESr-r D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ t( ~'f~ /_ t( Signature: r/~'~.~ Children's names: :v>/ ]'~''~:L Your children's classroom #s: /( / Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES D NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aeree with: ~ 1. School children's safe~. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ["~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES. nlease check below ali the statements you aeree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Mb ~E/~ ~(~ Signature: Your children's classroom #s: _~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida,h November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent slams for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~//YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check beloTM all the important reasons you agree with: ,[-] 1. School children's safety. ~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to emer or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ,~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minCe harking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules whe~ithe~dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. r-Y/~YES ~ NO (Check one) / If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: iIfffe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please prim: '~, ~.o ~&~ ~t~ Signature: ~[~%~ ~ Your children's classroom #s: ~- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: CC{ ¢ ~'~q ~r>~cqP,~/ra~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES DNO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~] 1. School children's safety. ~] 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure er0ergency vehi~cles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~5. Other (fill in): ~q~4 I,~ct~ [-m~s. J~ ~ J..12xx ~ ~tl<u~l~ I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping offor picking up my child/children from Faria. [--]NO (Check one) If answered YES, 131ease check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~.~ ~o,~tc5 Ct.w Children's names: '~lt~_~x,^_~ -I Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. ]/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~y~ ute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. S ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: .School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or 4.dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered, by traffic congestion. Other (mi in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~//~S ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~[~f. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~^¢~ql-I [4 t¢~'/tltq ~h k^t~ Signature: .~[X, ~/,~c.3--~ Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: ~- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/Wy support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~/myEinute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. S [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all thc important reasons you agree with: //School children's safety. [k~2/Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. - ' [~. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. EYES ~ ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~,ree with: I-I 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: - - PleaSe print: ~---~1 -- [4 t°Jr tO L ~ Children's names: ~q ~ ~ Signature: ~~ , Your ~hildren's classroom #s: ~ ~turn this form to your child s teacher by Friday~ November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~y'Enute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. S [~] NO (Check one) · If answered YES, please check below all thc important reasons you agree with: ?3i School children's safety. - Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. EYES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ['] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [-12. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: X~7., [7 Your children's classroom #s: return this form to your child's teacher by Fridaxh November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-mi.nute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. t-~ YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: L~l. School children's safety. ~ Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. q~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. L[~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. O 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the statements you agree with: //We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino, City Council: Name'of Fada parent or guardian comlSleting this letter: Please print: ~ 0,4r~ ~ 02 Children's names: /-~6L~,~e~"'-~- -~c~t~x~,.~,~ Signature: -~-~, Your children's classroom #s: #/O Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: }School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. J~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~I~e will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~~ Signature: ~ Pldase return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November Children's names: ~t~¢t2-'(::~A/C-~ff:aA/~ Your children's classroom #s: 2~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, Please check below all the important reasons you agree With: [~ 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles $re not hindered by traffic congestion. , -- ~]5. Other (fill in): ~d~ .~o~clc~ & ~30~r~ 4~, ~~a)~ I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES (Check one) ENO If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: sAN I L K~l ~q fO ~ff~" Your children's classroom #s: ~t Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Flus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino CiW Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Doily Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES DNO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. l-] 5. Other (fill in):. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES (Check one) ENO If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: k-'] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. IFqqe will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: e lease print: ~f~t~A ,oa~ ~ ~,f4 Signature: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22, 2002. Children's names: ~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ William Faria ,Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/Vie support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. x~//YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~,ree with: 4... School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in):~ I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules yEeither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: . I/We will not park in a that blocks a neighbor's driveway. way I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~ ~d [/.¥ ( ~[ f~J Children's names: L I ~ ,~ Signature: I~ ~ ~ C tx__..- Your children's classroom #s: Q/) Please retut'n this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ES D NO (Check one) If ansWered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~f. School children's safety. Less i>verall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~S [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: _~./k/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [_~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print ~_~'~\~C~.c~ ~(kC~- [-0,-rlr~ Children's names: ¢~<aC~ill~'~- L-C~q3 Signature: P~"~~///~5 ~ Your children's classroom #s: Z m to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3 School children's safety. - Less. overall traffic'congestiOn at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. 4~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES. t)lease check below all the statements you aeree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: j'{e~.(- /v]i~'~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travcrs 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~5~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /~0~i5 Lin Signature: ~ Children's names: ~G t?D ~ t'~ Your children's classroom #s: 2_ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aoree with: 3.School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fa_da. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [3 5. Other (fill in): 2. l.%Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when ther dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S [~NO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print.~ 0,~.1~ ~"-/~x--~ Children,s namesi"--¢ ~l~ [ Ir. i Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent stares for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. · Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~/YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES. Please check below all the statements you agree with: 2 I/We will not park in a that blocks a neighbor's driveway. way I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please prim: 3/L4 Signature: Children's names: /~25~/? Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success· In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: /~'"2' School children's safety.  Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 31 Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or '_~74 dismissal times. · Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 1-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the statements you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: -P~ease~et;rn th}~orm to your child's Children's names: ~'~- 1 ~/¥~T[q Your children's classroom #s: ' 2 teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~//YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [. . School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):~ 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]~S ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: .I will in that blocks neighbor's driveway. not park a way a will be considerate when residents arc trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~Gc~,~ ~3~c~/~ Signature: Children's names: ~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ ~. Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~'YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~. School children's safety. 31Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. · Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-15. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ["~YES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: A[r,~ar I Your children's classroom #s: 2-- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. IFvVe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES ENO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by t~'~[fic~ qofigestion. [~5. Other (fill in): ~l.~-.:,- -'~ ~ ,:,.~,. ,..,--;(,~)~ ~--~ ~".l 2~ L~r~ 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~/YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~}~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: I ~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridas'~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 51. School children's safety. 93~}2: Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. n 5. Other (fill in): o I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~tES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~/~J~ ?,~NbT/fllol Signature: ~ -/~ ~lease return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: William l arla Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~.YES [~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. ~g~ ~: Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home'during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. DYES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the statements you aeree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: ~ Name of Faxia parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:, P-)(e[- ~3~0 Signature: r~.,L ~r>>._. _ ~ Children's names: Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [7~'YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ail the important reasons you agree with: 3 1 School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~' dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYEs [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~'1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~}[ -vCP-k3C3blF-,r Signature: __ - -v/t ~ Children's names: 7<~;¢r Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~ree with: School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: t,.~e0c'tfl~e~/~ Your children's classroom #s: l~ ~J/,~ ~' Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 1 §, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. .{~YES [-I NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 3iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]YES NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: C~)v~[/t~ Signature: Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: ,~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~ree with: . School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. -., E~. Other (fill in): -~-~ ~r /,ccd~ c~v¢,~ ~td ¢,e' {~w~v~:~J~'/ 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. C] o , eckon , If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /~ ~'Z V(5 f"~O C-f~ Signature: ~x)' ''~ ~ Children's names: [~,~rO Y t4Z lC VE i,,t c/Z-~?ft Cc£ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success· In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the ............................................................................... 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [ NO(Check one) If answered YES. Dlease check below all the important reasons you aeree with: ,1~. School children's safety. t~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or 5'dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindere~d by traffic congestio~.. · Other (fill in): ("A~xx/q.~em,.k 1.,~ ~ 6vO~ afl, x> ~ x(~ 6¢ c& cr~r 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: x~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: L)sBA ~k,v-A~fAt4 Children's names:. S/X>3>~,&v--~P, ~>g-~ggD Signature: ~'~q~q~'/'; Your children's classroom #s: 3 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Doily Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES [~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~ree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in): 2. IfWe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~"~ SSt'C ~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ ~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent  te parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: chool children's safety. ess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. elps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ...Hdismissal times. elps ensure emergency vehi~ers are n~t h~ndere,..d by traffic congestions.,, Other (fill in): ~ ~DLO~,~V, ~'~.C._~R~ ¢QcO.~/~, 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S ENO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the statements you agree with: ~i. i/We will not park in a way that blocks a neig,h,~or's driveway. /We will be considerate when residents are tr)ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~..~ ~g,)l .Qf~.~ (.P Children's names: ]~/~ Please retu~n~this form to your child s teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rotes our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: i' School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not l-dndered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: {iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~/t~~/y Signature: ~ Children's names: ~tt/~ ~3~TUg Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonsh'ate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES ['] NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: i' School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 2. I/We will comply with ali the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [-~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you agree with: ~] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~y-¥-~¥ t~ on~ Signature: ~ ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: Your children's classroom V~illiam Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 2iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~5. Other(fillin):h~l~6 &tOt/t, ~. SL[ao~t (~tltc~, o~vivwroo, dC 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules /yEeither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: [~21 I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Pleaseprint:/[~{B,/v~ d~'T~q[v~ ~J00~y Children's names: ~x/tS'DM/ ¢)0~ 0 o Signature: k~i~-or~ ~2~[~ ~-------~oourchildren,sclassroom#s:__ 2~___ Please retur~ this form to(y~ir ehdd's teacher by Frida~, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academies Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. FWe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: }iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~[4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~5. Other (fillin): /4o0? ,~,~,,,~b~ ~,-.~"~ ~'-.-~ .L~~, ~ 0,,..2, k3~--, ! 2. I/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. YES (Check one) DNo If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: /~""'"~ Children's names: j~" Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-~nute parking zone ~n the streets adlacen to Faria. ENO (Check one) If answered YES, vlease check below all the important reasons you aeree with: .School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. D 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-I 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. lfWe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ENO (Check one If answered YES. please check below all the statements you agree with: ~. i/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. /We will be considerate when residents are tD~ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Signature: ~ ~ Children,s names:'--~,l L).g tq ~'~3~ ~.g, Your children's classroom #s:~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES [-']NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~,ree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fafia. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. D 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the statements you aoree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Signature: Children's names: ~ct~,~--I Your children's classroom #s: B Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~S ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ' ~.. School children's safety. - ~ Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~3~. Helps Faria'~ neighbors who need to enter Or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. l/~Ve will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when eithe~r dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ...I/We will not park in a way that a neighbor's driveway. blocks I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: SignatUre: Your children's classr6om #s: ' ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Dear Faria Parents, William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria fm-nily completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. '~ YES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you a~,ree with: [-I 1. School children's safety. []~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ['] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ensure emergency vehicles are not kindered ~4. Helps (fill in): [,Ao ?,)- ~-'~Lg-/vx-Li ' by traffic congestion. ~[~. Other 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you am'ce with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~E~?AL/ Children's names: ~ Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonslxate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 2' School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. /[~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. /[~S [-']NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: .~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. /[]/2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fafia parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: [(/~HAS~MY V IS~ ^N~ ~-~ Signature: ~. [/~,.~ -A~~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. IfvVe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. eYES E NO (Check one) If answered YES. ~lease check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD· Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. YES [']NO (Check one) f answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: N~e of F~a p~ent or g~di~ complet~g ~s leaer: Please print: /N/~q ~'. ~..v'/-4 ~ oI~3~./tPl;'A Children's names: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Your children's classroom #s: 3 _'~ ~ ~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. /~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the imPortant reasons you agree with: ~] 1. School children's safety. g] 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [']3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ['] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: .~}4A,"o~-q'~u ' ' Signature: ~) '~ ~ ~ ¥~,-~ Children's names: .A~ ~/~3/~- Your ckildren's classroom/ts: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: . School children's safety. · Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [-~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ,~q,~t,3 k-~0 Signature: ~-.~^ ')C J7~O Children's names: Yoar children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hi.n. dered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): IfWe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking z6ne~ with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking'Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~-fi~t/~ Your children's classroom #s: 5 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~'YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ['] 1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-13. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. I-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. o I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~S [-']NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~ar~ ~9~Z Your children's classroom #s: ~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way ttxrough our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ' If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 2Schoc~l children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and.dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~]4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ENO Checkone If answered YES. vlease check below all the statements you a~ree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~,~¥o~ O ¥~L · Signature: ~" v0'/ Children's names:, Your children's classroom #s: q~ ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22, 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers .1,. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~'~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: I~ 1. School children's safety. ['vl 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~] 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~t4 ~ot~ [--~?~ Signature: ,9~,-~"'~,.~ ~ Children's names: y¢onO, Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES ~NO (Checkone) If answered YES., please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES l-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: IFWe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please prim: /~1/! /C/~'~'/ /~.'~c~ Children's names: ::J3q///v'/qgt t~*cn'W Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. ,/ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ]~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 1. School children's safety. 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~r5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-mlnute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: x~l'c3c,~t ~Qo~dL/ Your children's classroom #s: ~©c~ ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida~h November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulationsl We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. U~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/XVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~Es [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~/1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. []/2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: tl, t/s/¢ Teo~,j,~,v-f~ Children's names: ~n~a ~07~ ~ec~/~ Your children's classroom #s: ~5 ' Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~'~YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ['~-]YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please prim: _~Mtt_V Signature: _~Z~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: A.~%T! M Your children's classroom #s: ~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with:  School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 0 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. eYES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: '~i I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~:~/~ I~//~ iQ ~1 Signature: ~... Children's names: A~'-c~[c~c~ ~V.S])crro- Your children's classroom #s: ,'~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules ither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with:  1. I/we will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. . I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their dri~ eways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: ' Pleasepfint:-~[[2OV~4~ 20~/[(0 Children's names: --/ ~q ~A,,,, ~ Your children's classroom #s: ~_~ Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minnte parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/~te support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety_. [~2} Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal .times at Faria. ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-I 5. Other (fill in):. 1~ will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~]~1. I/W~ will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [j~2. I/X~ will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~7"f~SMI~,' ~/OTM~}~/-730 ~cP{' Signature: ~ Children's names: ~Lel::l'fCJ' ~OTH PrFle~tW~q c~ _ Your children's classroom #s: .~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~//YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 32. School children's safety. Less overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules ither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S ~']NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neig,h,~or's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are tO ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /¥~g'/~' g~r~v[k°l/g~, Signature: ~ v Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: -~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demons'a'ate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: i' School children's safety. - Less overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria~ i Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. i H elps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. Other (fill in): 2. I/XVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules ~'hen either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~-~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of l~aria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~-, .~ I¢prT ~ Signature: ~ _ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida,~'~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~ [ g-~ ~ pc Your children's classroom #s: ~ ~ William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. IfvVe support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: . School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~/31 Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~/1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~/2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~/~[~d~,~q ~/~r~9/~1 ~ Signature: Children's names: ~/~ ~t"~ Your children's classroom #s: ~-~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent  parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ['~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~2.. LChOol children's safety. ess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~elps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or r-t'"/- dismissal times. c-El4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. L~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~.~/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. q~2WI~/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: "~q4~. ~[ £~,~-~h~/~--.-~-'f Children's names: Signamre:~~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. J~/YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 44 Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["]5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. 7S (Check one) ENO answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: iIF~Ve will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are tr~ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: .~~ Children's names: VIV~& Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minnte parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ¢ YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~}i School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~[~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. $yEs Ciao (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: 21I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~' C:~. Signature: Children's names: ¢~'~ ~/~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations! We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~---]YES [-'] NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leabe their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~7~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES. ~lease check below all the statements you agree with: ~] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: {-/- f/~ (~/-/E Signature: ,~ /~-~ ~/~ __ / Your children's classroom #s: ~ ~ ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. William Faria Academics Plus School Cupertino Union School District Dear Faria Parents, November 18, 2002 Congratulations.* We are half way through our 6-month pilot project for 30-minute parking, and the Faria School Site Council (SSC) rates our pilot project as a great success. In preparation for an upcoming Cupertino City Council meeting in which our SSC will request permanent status for the 30-minute parking zone, we need your support. To demonstrate Faria's continued good faith in working cooperatively with our neighbors, the Faria SSC requests that each Faria family completes the following letter, which will be forwarded to the Cupertino City Council. - Dolly Travers 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~S [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: D 1. School children's safety. 1'-12. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ]-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: e will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. e will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~_~¢Jb~,~,~ ¥~a.,~O~x~x--o"x'2-~''2~'- Children's names: ~ Signature: l~) nJ~ / Your children's classroom #s: ~_ PlW~ s~this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~1. School children's safety. {~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~'3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~ES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~I1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. 5. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~[~}~,qC Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: I1 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with thc Furia Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~yEs ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: D¢~./c r-o, k ¢. Signature: .D Q¢,~-~,~ q kQh¢ C ~. Children's names: Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES. ~lease cheek below all the important reasons you aeree with: 3i School children's safety. Less. overai! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their homexluring arrival or [~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~/YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES. ~lease check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:_ ~ /; c ~_ ~ [~ ~,,,~ SignatUre: Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1~We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES. olease check below all the important reasons you agree with: [iSchool children's safe~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. cY~S I-']NO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the statements you agree with: ~?1. lAVe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. lAVe will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please prim://~/¢-~/'/q C ,{~,,~C/~'/'t2 0 Signature: (-~ t/.-- e~ ~~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent SO-minute paridng zone in the streets adjacent to Farla. YES [-'] NO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. I-q 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: }I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: 5' Htt 0 -- t4 At> Cj, ~ Signature: ~ Children's names: er, ce,,~c ~-4'o,?,ve Your children's classroom #s: /09 , /~/ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. g YES ~ NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ii School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~]4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/~Ve will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: _i-~ %' /,l k/l~ L ~_.,x~/ Children's names: .---/~/~(/~'~ c> Signature: k./~/~l/c~/qgZ,/ Your children's classroom #s: 7 Pl~se retur~is form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~-~ YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [-~YES [-~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: p~{CPIll*[~q~O~ Signature: Children's names: ~'"~ ~..~' Your children's classroom #s: /'._C'- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES D NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~7]YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~[~/~ Signature: ~- ~ ~/)? (/~///~/~;~z~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~?]~[~[~ Your children's classroom #s: 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~S [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]~ES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Pleaseprint: ~'//[ ff l'~'Jfi~ t~ ~ ~ eO fl~ Children,s names:~tT~ Dq"] C~ Your children's classroom #s: -'~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in thc streets adjacent to Faria. g YES D NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: ~1. School children's safety. [~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: y~X ~AJ ~ ~[ Signature: J , Your children's classroom #s: ~49 Plea~return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ? A] (~ ~_ ~ [ r 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES ~ NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. ~: Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. IfWe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: )/-,/TJtgr~ q ~./~/~ ~ Signature: ~ Children's names: ~r~rA/r.,/r,,a Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent ' t 3~/minute parking zone in the streets adjacen to Faria. L_~ YES ~] NO (Check one) ~ If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: [~/1. School children's safeW. )Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at. Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles arc not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. If answered YES. ~lease check below all the statements you agree with: '~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Pleaseprint: ~ ~- L; Signature: ~ ' Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: ~ >~ ~ 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~[~ii School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in):. -- I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules W~esither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i If We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~J\0x Signature: ,,.~ Children's names: .~q 0 l-~4tv) Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~-~YES ["] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: L[~i'. School children's safety. · x.~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fana.- ~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~.~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. DYES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: k-~l. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ,~'2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~do~ [c~v~ ~,_~ v~.c.¥; Signature: ~..2~t(~...~ ~.a ~ Children's names: ]~/~e%- Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥, November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~I~anSsw~ ~edNyOEs, pleasi~ill ~:~w all the important reasons you agree with: ~],1. School children's safety. 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. · 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules n ither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S E NO (Check one) swered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: -"~-~4t._[~ /~ Children's names: '~[Y'I~ Signamr~! ~ Your children's classroom #s: ,=~ Please retur~form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES DNO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. gl 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~13. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. t I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [-'-'-~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ~_,?,--~¢,Ot~ ~:3 Children's names: [,-tA~,~,,- ~ ~d/-q~ ~/UO Your children's classroom #s: ~ Ple~s/te re~urn this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [] 1. School children's safety. [~/2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~]'~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: CTM ~ ~i / Children's names: '~bo~ Signature:_~~,'z~l~ Your children's classroom#s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. 1. l/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. 31Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ]-] 5. Other (fill in): 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~/YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES ~'] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 'Gl. School children's safe~y. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria~ Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] $. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES. vlease check below ali the statements you agree with: '[~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Earia parent or guardian completing this letter: Pleasepfint: ,~eiqO y[ rl 2 /'~Ct rt ~ Signature: ~ ~'~'~-~. Children's names: Ct~tl~ Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [t 1. School children's safety. ~]21[]/3 Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fa_da. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guarAia~completing this letter: Please print: AlXox~\c'[~ ~ ~JCX . Children's names: ~¥~Ca.B kcx v '~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ ~ . Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ES E NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~Es DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: .I/we will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~--~H~--P-~ A ~,,o,...x~ ! Signature: ~ ~ ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: (Q.~r~/5 Your children's classroom #s: 1. ~%Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~. School children's safety. [~ff. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~]~Y. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 4/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: .I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: eleaseprint: ~fllq~)~47(4 [¥10~41qt0/~a] Children's names: ~ k/~/4 Signature: ~)~, Your children's classroom #s: [ I Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. I. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~/YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ,!School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~ dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. DNo (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~'1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~]~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: .~I~IEE TV um tlP7'/~ Children' s names:~ Your children's classroom #s: [] Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22, 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any~ concerns or comments you would !ike shared wi~h the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: --T~ Signature: Children's names: Your children's classroom #s: I I Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. vEs [2NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~[1. School children's safety. ~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ;[~L3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: '~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ,[~-2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:~ ~'~}b~a~O~ \~-/$~L Children's names: ~,.Jkc~¢r.~ (-¢}q .,,~ Your children's classroom #s: 1 ~ Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ,YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all thc important reasons you agree with: i' School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. /~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino C~ty Council on the requesteu 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~[YES BNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES E NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ]~,1. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~J~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria.  YES ENO (Check one) f answered YES, olease check below all the statements you a~ree with: 1~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~L~- I/we will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Nme of F~a p~ent or g~dian completing this le~er: mleaseprint: C~>'~ --~ ~[~ g~,~ Children'snmes: ~jx~f ~O,'~ Signa~e: ~~& ~ Yo~ children's classroom ~s: f/ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: '~] 1. School children's safety. '1~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. c~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. NO (Check one) answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. '1~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~_[A-e~4~ ~ ~'~ ~ Signamre:~'~~ ~'-~~ Your children's classroom #s: ~.~. Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES [-~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the impo~ant reasons you agree with: i' School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. . I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ~ Children's names: ~'/~ ~4~fc~: Your children's classroom #s: ! t' Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. /Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~/4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-[ 5. Other (fill in): IFvVe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~/YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statemems you agree with: iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~/.! .~'{~ ~15)0~ Children's names: dk~A~// Signature: /'.~//~f~' ~%s Your children'sclassroom#s: f/ /Please return th~s ~m to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 3~ute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. S D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: /LSChool children's safety. ess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [[]d./Jq, ltelps Faria's, neighbors, who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~ dismissal t~mes. I[ff4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when her dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: 1 ..~i~e will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. e will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Children' s names: '~0 Ir{D, ~/~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ ~ ( ~ 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. '~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. FI 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/ES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: t/~O~d~J~l Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Farla. ~/YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules W~sther dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. D NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the statements you a~ree with: .. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: '~ ot Signature: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~o A, Your children's classroom 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~X~YES D NO (Check one) ,If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: }iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. J~/4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: '~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~)~'~ ~,A~ ¥ % -~ '~v ~ Signature: ,,,,,_ ~ ~ Children's names: p/X6v,,~:L~-~'['~ ~ ~, Your children's classroom#s: I [ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. /~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~'~J. School children's safety. ~ Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. · i Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in):. o 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when ~ither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. vEs [ No (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor s drive ay. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: : ~ ~ J ~ '- - Children's names: "~ - " '~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return tliis form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 1~ 1. School children's safety. ~] 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~--~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ~ ~ Your children's classroom #s: ~this form to your child's teacher by Frida~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: x~P~~° I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ['-~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~] 1. School children's safety. ~ Less overal! traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria' i Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. '1~,4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 0 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. '~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~_1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~[~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~P- ~ C~ ~"~ 0 Signature: ~'~'' ~ Children's names:. '~'O__r~CJ'-'~,'x ~2~[ 0 Your children's classroom #s: [ [ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent JO-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~ NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~_ I. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in):_ 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/chiidren from Faria. ~YES (Check one) ENo If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: [//~/'-~/')z i~Ut~/2~"~/(F)(~ Children's names: ~'~t~//'J/~ Signature: J~/~/~'~,gY ~<: ~----)~z~.Y~,~/~,~ Your children'sclassroom#s: // ~r/Y~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22, 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES D NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~/(~L '~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 33i School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): w I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S [']go (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2.i/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. /We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their drixeways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~~A~.'r~Y Hg!~; Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: fV[ ~t~ ~t~ Your children's classroom #s: '~ 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES ~ NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: 0 1. School children's safety. 231 Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~,2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ["q I TA ~/~0 ~ )d'q T7 Children's names: Please return this form to your chiid~jteacher~l by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/~Ve support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES DNO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you aoree with: X,~l. School children' s safety. x.~2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. x,~3. Helps Fafia's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~/4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. 'L~YES ENO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: L~I. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ~,~//~/,,c~ ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: ~O~ Your children's classroom #s: t/ O I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: }iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. 0 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ]-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES ~-~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ,J Children's names: "'~f.f,'~-~ L Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important masons you agree with: ~[2~](11 School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~/4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~me with: 2.I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /_- Or{/~,4 /Y/t~ 2_ Signature: ~/~x Children's names: t~)/~,,o ]FJUt'S 5abd~/~t./'Oaf Your children's classroom #s: 7 £ 23- Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~S D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: {~i. School children's safety. [~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. 51 Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered hy traffic congestion. Other (fill in): ~.o, (.~.~ %~,'~-~-~ I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the statements you agree with: 21I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: .pl[l)t~. ~rr ~ I Your ckildren's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~]YES [~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safely. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: /~/x/.rf)/~l (/4,0~/:) K ~Hhfr Children's names: /k/frT~Sf[ rQ  *this Your children's classroom #s: ~ PI form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES D NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~11. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arriv~.l or dismissal times. [-] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]YES [']NO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: /~ A V' ~5 "L '/'/~ Signature: ,/&.L'c o.~'/ ,~- ~[ Children's.names: :~ ~f'~ }4 Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We .s_uppor[the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ['~YES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Fa.da. ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindere, d by traffic congestion. [~5. Other (fill in): [pq~ ?o[[t~$qc3~' &c~4 o I/We will complX with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ['~YES [-']NO (Check one) If answered YES. nlease check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fafia parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ~i~0,xl~¢. ~u3c>~O Children's names: ~C~rc~q /~t~Oor~q ~ J~/~J~ //~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22, 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. OYES DNO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. [-q 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~] 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [-~YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~] 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~o,e ~{u Signature: ~ Children's names: ~j :t] ,'~ ~xJ~,t& Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. j~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: s oo, Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES ['-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: Ifqqe will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Signature: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22, 2002. Children's names: /Z~ l ~/i }q Your children's classroom #s: 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or "~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Par'king Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. If answered YES. ~lease check below all the statements you agree with: ~'}i park a way a neighbor's driveway. I/~Ve will not in that blocks I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: t~ J_/~/~J ~ M ~ Signature: ~9 ~_-~-v~ ~ Children's names: ~o~r,e~ ShE f) Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. YES [-] NO (Check one) - If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~] 1. School children's safety. l~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are lag'ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~,~[ ~,n TO,/ Signature: Children's names: K4 ,.~,b O..z" ly '-Fo[ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~/YES D NO (Check one) · If answered YES, please check beloW all the important reasons you agree with:  School children's safety. - i Less overal! traffic Congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria s neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or  dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. 1"] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Par'king Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Pleaseprint.~i~--~i~"[ ~-~[~ ' Children,snames: ~/~-dy~_~[.~ Signature: ~~ ~ ' .f(~_.~ Your children's classroom #s: q.r) Please ret6rn this form to your child s teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~(YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES. olease check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~11. School children's safety. E~/~i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minule parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules ~TyEeither dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. S t.~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are lD'ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~q- ~ )[V rn th~s form to your child's Children's names:-~ ~c~V' tA~t~ . Your children's classroom #s: ~, teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. I. I/We suppor~ the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~. School children's safety. [~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. SYES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~I. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~¢q,¢e-[¥ w 1.-,'~ Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~]'4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with ali the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: - Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: SignatUre: Childrefi'S n~rnes:-~ r~d ~. '~ ~-r Your children's classroom #S: - · Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES 0 NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~}! School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules ss'hen either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~-~YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are tD'ing to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Please print: Signature: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: ~tJ , Your children's classroom #s: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. Children's names: I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adiacent to Faria. ~t/YES ['-1 NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~1. 'School children's safety. ~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival'or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when her dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~ DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: ~/~/. Ii/x/Ww; will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway- will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. Children's namesl~' ~]~(l, FOv~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~ YES ['~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~ 1. School children's safety. [~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~J2[~'l: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Your children's classroom #s: rQ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~[1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~r]YES ["]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Please print: Signature: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: / ,' ~ Children's names: ~ e~ ~/' J~ ~,,~ ~ Your children's classroom #s: 60 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: }]School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~JYES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fa_da parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~/~ E'~} ~/~- ]/5/ ( Signature: N~.~ --~ Children's names: ,~ ~ ~J~/]/Or'x/ 1 Your children's classroom #s: ~ 8 Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. 1. /IP6re support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. .~YES [-] NO (Check one) ' If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~} Schoollchildren's safety. - i Less ox erall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. .~] 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ,~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I"] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [5 s SNO If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print.: Signature: Children's names: C~'~ Y~YDOU ,]'0,~ 1,1 Your children'~ classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: i School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~4. dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~/YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES. please check below all the statements you agree with: 121 not park a way a neighbor's driveway. I/%Ve will in that blocks I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Signature: ~ ~Jease r~rn~thls for~ ,o Your children's classroom #s: your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. ~[2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-15. Other (fill in):. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. eYES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~,~ l~ (/~¢/~--~ Signature: /~ ;~ ~------------ Children's names: /r/c~' ~Ift~. Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. Council I ent I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City 30-rain-re parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~//YES ~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~.~School children's safety. ~. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~13. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or ~ dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-I 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino Cio, Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S ~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: Iwill not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. will be considerme when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: 'q ~'~[x~.h~,~ ~,~ '~h. Signature: .~. x,}' ~ Children's names: P'lt'i~/fJl ~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ ,~,~,~. ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES [-~ NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [~ 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~]YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children' s name s: Y~Yrt ~XT~,,//-~ Lf(~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~[YES [-] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ 1. School children's safety. ~] 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [-~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: }I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~\O.~a ~O.U~ Signature: Children's names: ~)2. ~ ~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ~NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: }School children's safety. i Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. ~ 3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in):. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. OYES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. 1~ 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: Children's names: ~J~C~[~r~ O~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent  parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. D NO (Check one) If answere~ ?fF~, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~//~ool children's safety. Jess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. telps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria ~vhen citer dropping off or pfc king up my chil d/children from Fa ria. Pa rking Rules \1'-1/x~l.YES ~] NO (Check one) If an, s,.,wef~/~.YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~. }4/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. ~.~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Pleaseprint:X'~Q~ ,,~([¢ %r~ Children's names: LJov~x Signature :~l~-cl~ 'L~ ~ · ~'~ Your children's classroom #s: --- t --yd. JPlease return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES ['~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~!! School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ['] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria.  YES [~NO (Check one) If answered YES., please check below all the statements you agree with: 12I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. i I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: r; rnfft i form Your children's classroom #s: ~ to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~NO (Checkone) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: .. School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. IFWe will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES [-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you aeree with: . I/We will not park in a that blocks a neighbor's driveway. way I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ,~j~v[~.5 -~/~,~ Signature: Children's names: ,//~&~ p~r~ ~.__..~'.->~..b~'N .-~---~ Your children's classroom #s: ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~YES [~ NO (Check one) If answered YES., please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~ii School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ~ 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: [-] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [-] 2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ?)~? _~ ~/7 Signature: ~ ~? ~ Children's names: Your children's classroom/ts: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. 1. 1/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. lq NO(Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: ~!! School children's safety. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. SYES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~ 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [-12. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: eleaseprint: /¢'-~0,5(~ '7-'~)~'/~/~ Signature: c~AS~j~_ ~_<~~ Children's names: Your children's classroom/ts: Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~fYES DNO (Check one) If answered YES~ please check below all the important reasons you agree with: iSchool children's safely. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. J~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. ["] 5. Other (fill in):. 2. 1/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES. ~lease check below ali the statements you agree with: 4iI/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ]~(a~k[~ ~CJ4~ ]P-2 Signature: ~ Children's names: [c(t 'F_~ E~/'! ~-- Your children's classroom #s: /~ ~ Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~S [~NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: . School children's safety. · Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [~. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion· [-15. Other (fill in):. 2./Y/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES I-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you a~ree with: ~/1. g/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guarfl'i~gn completing this letter: Please print: ~tq ~ ~1 ¢: ~l~-~ r~pr Signature: Children's names: ~O~IQ Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Fridav~ November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~"¥ES D NO (Check one) answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~1. School children's safety. [::12. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. [-J 3'. Helps Faria'sPneighbors who need to enter or leave their home-during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. I'-] 5. Other (fill in):. o I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off Or picking up my child/children from Faria. ' - ~S I-]NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~}2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print:. %:-~- / ~ ~, ~ °°,q~ ( O, Signature: ~--'~}~-' ~ ~"-~ Childr¢"'s names: % ¼ o. - Your children's classroom Please return this form to your child's teacher by Friday~ November 22~ 2002. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~YES ["] NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: D 1. School children's safety. ~ 2. Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. I-q3. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. ~ 4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [-'~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: ~] 1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. [~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: ~z]l/~ 5},o~r,xo Children's names: /41~31~ 4~ _ '~,C'/~X Your children's classroom #s: 9_ 2_ ~f Please return this form to your child's teacher by Frida¥~ November 22~ 2002. I. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. ~'/YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below ali the important reasons you agree with: ~.I. School children's safety. iLess overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~/4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. [-] 5. Other (fill in): 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino CiD' Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. [~YES DNO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the statements you agree with: 2.. I/we will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Fada parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: ~"}rCL/gl.C~ ~'6Z4/L Children's names: ~J-~h/~)/~ Signature: ,~,//~Lr~ ~/ Your children s classroom #s: [! ~ , Please return this form to your child s teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. 1. I/We support the Faria School Site Council's request to the Cupertino City Council for a permanent 30-minute parking zone in the streets adjacent to Faria. [~/YES D NO (Check one) If answered YES, please check below all the important reasons you agree with: [~. School children's safety. 31Less overall traffic congestion at arrival and dismissal times at Faria. Helps Faria's neighbors who need to enter or leave their home during arrival or dismissal times. [~4. Helps ensure emergency vehicles are not hindered by traffic congestion. D 5. Other (fill in):. 2. I/We will comply with all the conditions as set forth by the Cupertino City Council on the requested 30-minute parking zone, with the California Motor Vehicle Code, and with the Faria Parking Rules when either dropping off or picking up my child/children from Faria. ~S ~]NO (Check one) If answered YES. nlease check below all the statements you agree with: ~1. I/We will not park in a way that blocks a neighbor's driveway. x~2. I/We will be considerate when residents are trying to enter or leave their driveways. Please list any concerns or comments you would like shared with the Cupertino City Council: Name of Faria parent or guardian completing this letter: Please print: Signature: -3 /< Your children's classroom #s: Z~'~ Please return this'f6rm to your child's teacher by Friday, November 22~ 2002. EXHIBITS END HERE