17. Mary Ave Bicycle Footbridge
CITY OF
CUPEIQINO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Summary
AGENDA ITEM 11
AGENDA DATE December 6. 2006
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge Progress Report,
BACKGROUND
On June 21, 2005 the Council accepted a progress report on the Mary Avenue Bicycle
Footbridge Project. The project is a single span cable stayed bridge over Interstate Route
280 connecting an established bicycle trail system on Mary Avenue in Cupertino on the
south side of 1-280 to Mary Avenue in Sunnyvale on the north. The design concept,
developed by city staff and the design consultant team of Biggs-Cardosa Associates and
HNTB, Inc had been approved by the Council on February 1, 2005,
The Council, in adopting the FY 2005-2006 Capital Improvement program approved a
revised total project budget of $9,250,000. While that budget became the established
resource for the project, there still remained some uncertainties that could affect the
estimate of the total cost of the project. These included many Caltrans approval issues and
conditions, completion of wind force testing and other minor but yet to be resolved design
issues, As such, staff advised the Council that it would continue to seek additional funding
while the design was being completed and more refined cost estimates became available,
Bridl!e Desiw Concept
The cable-stayed bridge concept is one that has been used successfully all over the world
on large and small bridges for pedestrian, vehicular and rail traffic, It is currently being
used on a portion of the reconstruction of San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge. However, it
is still a relatively unusual and rare concept, and it remains one that is more architecturally
and visually striking than other traditional design concepts,
The 460 foot long bridge structure (325 feet of clear span over the freeway) consists of two
eighty-five foot tall support towers, a l6-foot wide bridge deck with the capacity to support
a light maintenance vehicle, An eight foot wide paved pathway winds through nearly
thirteen acres of landscaped approaches protected by privacy screening, residential
security, lighting, and signage,
Printed on Recycled Paper
I
11-1
UNIQUE NATURE OF THE MARY BICYCLE FOOTBRIDGE PROJECT
This narrative was included in the progress report in June of2005. However, it is important
that the unique and particular aspects of this project be understood so this information is
repeated here.
The proposed Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge (Mary BFB) project is uniquely different
in many respects from most capital projects designed and constructed by' the City of
Cupertino, It is important as the project design is nearing completion that these unusual
characteristics of the project be understood because it is largely not relevant to make
comparisons of costs of construction, project management, design and implementation of
the Mary BFB to other more traditional projects.
As noted above, the design of the Mary BFB as a single span cable-stayed structure with a
clear span of 325 feet over an interstate freeway at a high volume interchange (IR 280/ SR
85) presents, an extremely high quality of architecture and beauty in its appearance and
function. The bridge, when completed at the proposed site, will be a signature architectural
icon as well as a practical solution to the connection of two segments of the Mary Avenue
bicycle trail.
However, the architectural and engineering. design (A&E) and the construction
management (eM) costs are in a greater proportion to the construction costs than most
capital improvement projects (CIP) that the city has undertaken, For example, the
Library/Civic Center project had a ratio of A&E and CM costs (often referred to as "soft
costs") of 20 % of total project budget with the remaining 80% of the total project budget
for construction (referred to as "hard costs"), The Mary BFB on the other hand is currently
estimated to require approximately 34% of project costs to be allocated for A&E and CM
with the remaining 66% for the construction of the bridge and the landscaping on the
approaches. A summary of the more unique aspects of the project is described as follows,
Extraordinary Requirements for Design and Construction Management
There are a number reasons why a project of this nature generates this kind of demand for
soft costs, These include the coordination of requirements with the California State
Department of Transportation (CalTrans) in the construction of a facility over an active
interstate freeway, Also, because of the structural configuration of the bridge over the
freeway, extensive structural wind load evaluations are required including active wind
tunnel tests of a model of the structure as described below,
In addition to the normal responsibilities for traditional CM tasks during construction,
because of the occupancy of the project on and over the interstate freeway, there are
additional demands for testing, construction surveys, slope stability tests and design review
of falsework (the temporary structures supporting the bridge span over the freeway during
construction). Further, because of the highly specialized material (very high strength
concrete, post-tensioned high grade steel, among others) th~re will be a need for a "source
inspection" by Caltrans, the construction management team and the structural engineers, A
source inspection means that the material is tested and inspected as it is fabricated at its
"source", which may be in another state, or even another country,
2
( 1- :L
Finally, owing, again, to the unique nature of the project, there are some specialty
consultant costs associated with the project such as the artwork, the bridge span fencing,
lighting, railing and additional structural engineering peer reviews because of the unique
structural design of the bridge.
In summary, this project requires approximately $1,000,000 of additional design and
construction management effort not typically experienced on other city projects, which
accounts for the higher ratio of A&E/CM costs of 34% to construction costs of 66%, In
project budget terms as shown in Attachment A, the cost allocation for the current
proposed project cost of $ 10,822,000 is summarized as follows
Feasibility Study (2001)
A&E Design and Contract Administration
CM, Testing and Surveying
200,000
2,915,000**
600.000**
Subtotal- A&E I CM
$ 3,715,000 (34 %)
Construction - Phase I
Construction - Phase II
625,000
6.482.000*
Subtotal- Construction
$ 7,107,000 (66%)
Total Project Costs
$ 10,822,000 (100%)
*Includes 2% of construction cost ($145,000) for the project art sculpture,
**These estimates include several recommendations to the Council on this same agenda
for the Council's consideration, These are approval of amendment no. 2 to the contract
with HNTBlBiggs-Cardosa Assoc, in the amount of $470,000 and a contact for
construction management services with Swinerton CM Services, Inc,in the amount of
$600,000,
PROJECT DESIGN AND SCHEDULE IMPACTS
The design team is currently engaged in fmalizing the Phase II bridge construction
documents, The final bid package consisting of the plans, specifications and estimates
(PS&E) is to be completed in January, 2007. It is expected that the project will be
advertised at that time, and assuming the receipt of a responsive low bid, a
recommendation for the award of the construction contract would occur in late March,
2007, The construction will proceed shortly after that and is expected to be completed in
Aprilof2008,
This project has been delayed almost one year from its original schedule, which called for
completion in April of 2007, There are a number of reasons that have accumulated to cause
that delay.
3
11- J
Following concept approval of the cable stayed bridge, the design team began a detailed
investigation into the effects of wind and seismic activity on the bridge design, A series of
computer models were developed and studied by sub-consultants specializing in wind and
earthquake analyses, The narrow deck of the bridge and the high protective screen required
by Caltrans makes it somewhat more susceptible to the effects of gusty wind conditions.
To thoroughly understand those effects, a recognized and respected wind analysis team at
the University of West em Ontario, located in London, Ontario, constructed a six-foot long
scale model of a section of the deck that was tested in the wind tunnel.
The bridge also underwent additional detailed analysis of its stability during a variety of
earthquakes, because current seismic specifications require that after a maximum credible
earthquake, all bridge structures shall be designed to prevent collapse or injury or loss of
life, The additional time required for wind tunnel and seismic analysis along with a number
of other requirements by Caltrans, in whose right-of-way this bridge is being constructed,
has added a full year to the schedule and, as noted above, commensurate additional costs to
the project.
However, most of those activities and challenges have been met and staff and the
consultants along with the senior management of Caltrans are confident that the project can
proceed to construction early next year.
SCHEDULE
Based on the above considerations the current schedule, which is expected to prevail, is as
follows:
100% Design (PS&E) Completion
Bid and Award Construction Contract
Begin Construction
Complete Construction - Open Bridge
December
January-March
April
May
2006
2007
2007
2008
PROJECT ART
City policy requires that 1/4% of the constructed cost of a project be allocated for the
installation of public art, Because of the visibility and importance of this bridge project a
2% art allocation ($145,000 = 2% of$7.2 Million) was included in this project budget.
There is a case to be made (and has been made by some) that because of the unusual and
elegant architecture of the bridge, the bridge itself is a form of art. However, during the
feasibility study and in later forums, the Council and the community had expressed a desire
for more specific representation of sculptures or other art that reflects indigenous flora
and/or fauna ofthe region, Tom Aidala, a noted artist and architect was engaged to develop
art concepts for the bridge,
The initial concept, as shown to the Council in 2005 was to include art in the form of
egrets and other birds in flight on the superstructure and railings of the bridge,
Unfortunately these structures, while strikingly beautiful, created serious problems during
the wind tunnel testing to the extent that the concept had to be abandoned.
4
i7-Lf
In the alternative, a concept has been developed that would place sculptures on the
Cupertino side of the bridge approach. There would be two sculptures: one that would
include a family of California native quail elevated on a cluster of granite boulders, and the
other a red-tailed hawk elevated on a pedestal near the approach path, Staff will provide
renderings of this concept to the Council on December 6, 2006.
PROJECT FUNDING & BUDGET - SEE ATTACHMENT 'A'
FUNDING
In June of2005 the Council had approved a budget of$ 9,250,000 which was incorporated
into the 2005-2006 CIP, Since that time additional funding has been approved in the
amount of $ 630,000 for a total funding to date of $ 9,880,000, A recommendation in the
mid-year budget adjustments on this agenda proposes to add $390,000 in funds from
Proposition 42 that were received from the state after the budget was adopted. Proposition
42 is the voter approved mandate requiring the state to sub-vent certain funds from the gas
tax to local governments for transportation purposes, In addition, $360,000 in operating
budget savings from FY 2005-2006 is also proposed for the budget for a total of $750,000.
This would result in a total final funding of the project in the. amount of $10,630,000, A
summary of this funding extracted from Attachment' A' is as follows:
Total ADD roved Fundin!! - June 2005
$ 9.250.000 (rounded to $1000's)
Funding Approved Since June 2005
Additional State TDA
Additional TDA 3 (Non BEP)
06-07 CIP Funding MaryfMeteor Approach
Total Additional Approved Funding
$ 300,000
80,000
250.000
$ 630,000
Current Total Funding
$ 9.880.000
Proposed Additional Funding - Mid- Yr FY 06-07
State Proposition 42 Funds
GF Operating Budget Savings FY 05-06
$ 390,000
360.000
Total Additional Proposed Funding
$ 750.000
FINAL PROJECT FUNDING
$ 10.630.000
It should be noted that in this project the investment from the City's general Fund in the
amount of $ 1,585,000 is highly leveraged by other outside funding sou:r:ces in the amount
$ 9,045,000, Said another way, over 85% of the total project budget comes from sources
other than the City's general fund, Le" almost a 6 to I ratio,
5
1,,-)
PROJECT BUDGET ESTIMATE
The project Budget as shown on Attachment' A' is as noted below:
Cost Estimate - December 2006
Item
Feasibility Study (Completed 2001))
AdminlPermitslF ees
DesignJPS&E (BGIHNTB)
Construction Design Services (BCIHNTB)*
Construction Management (PB)*
Construction - Phase I (Completed 2005)
Cost Estimate Construction -Phase II
Public Art (2% of$7,2M)
*(Approval Recommended 12/06/06)
Total 1 00% Project Cost Estimate
(Rounded to $1000's)
Amount
$ 200,000
393,000
2,052,000
470,000
600,000
625,000
6,337,000
145.000
$ 10.822.000
There is a variance in the funding proposed and the cost estimate as follows:
Cost Estimate
Funding Proposed
. Funding variance
$ 10,822,000
10.630.000
$ 192,000
This difference is attributed to two uncertainties, i,e., the unknown cost of source
inspection which had been expected to be provided by Caltrans but is now included in the
budget in the amount of $ 100,000 and approximately $ 92,000 in minor cost variances in
the construction project. Staff is not recommending additional funding for this variance at
this time because the inspection issue has not yet been resolved and the minor variances
represent less than 1,5 % of the construction cost and are within the expected margin of
error for bidding, Further cost refinements prior to advertising the job will most likely
eliminate this 1.5 % variance,
It is recommended that the Council accept this progress report on the Mary Bicycle Foot
Bridge project.
Submitted by:
7::f1~r~aurJ
Director of Public Works
Approved for submission:
UJ(
David W, Knapp
City Manager .
6
17.-10
ATTACHMENT 'A'
Proposed Mary Avenue Bicvcle Footbridi!e Proiect Budi!et
Cost Estimate - December 2006 (Rounded to $1000's)
Item Amount
Feasibility Study (Completed 2001))
AdminIPermitsIF ees
Design/PS&E (BG/HNTB)
Construction Design Services (BC/HNTB)*
Construction Management(PB)*
Construction - Phase I (Completed 2005)
Cost Estimate Construction -Phase II
Public Art (2% of$7.2M)
*(Approval Recommended 12/06/06)
Total 100% Project Cost Estimate
Fundini! Sources
VTA Grant Share
State Transportation Fund (Sher)
City of Sunnyvale
Bicycle Transportation Account (State)
TDA 3 (non-BEP)
City of Cupertino CIP
Total Approved Funding - June 2005
Fundini! Approved Since June 2005
Additional State TDA
Additional TDA 3 (Non BEP)
06-07 CIP Funding Mary /Meteor Approach
Total Additional Approved Funding
Current Total Funding
Proposed Additional Fundini! - Mid- Yr FY 06-07
State Proposition 42 Funds
GF Operating Budget Savings FY 05-06
Total Additional Proposed Funding
FINAL PROJECT BUDGET
$ 200,000
393,000
2,052,000
470,000
600,000
625,000
6,337,000
145000
$ 10.822.000
$ 7,000,000
500,000
110,000
600,000
65,000
975.000
$ 9,250,000
$ 300,000
80,000
250.000
$ 630,000
$ 9,880,000
$ 390,000
360 000
$ 750,000
$ 10.630.000
11-7
City Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3202
(408) 777-3354
FAX (408) 777-3333
CITY OF
CUPEIUINO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Summary
AGENDA ITEM
17 ~\...
AGENDA DATE December 6.2006
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Adopt Resolution No, 06- 10 ~ authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute
Amendment No, 2 with Biggs Cardosa Associates to provide Final Design and
Construction Phase Services to the City on the Mary Avenue Bike & Pedestrian Bridge
project for a basic fee not to exceed $420,000, and an additional fee of $50,000 which
may be authorized by the Director of Public Works for Additional Services, on an as-
needed basis, for a total fee not to exceed $470,000,
BACKGROUND
On May 5, 2003, Council adopted Resolution No, 03-082, authorizing the City Manager
to execute a design services agreement with Biggs Cardosa for an amount not to exceed
$1,300,000, of which $75,000 was to be used for Additional Services, as determined to
be necessary by the Director of Public Works.
On June 21, 2005, Council adopted Resolution No. 05-109, authorizing the City Manager
to execute Amendment No,! with Biggs Cardosa for an amount not to exceed $752,500
for Caltrans related services and design services unique to cable stayed bridges,
Biggs Cardosa is nearing completion of the Final Design of the bridge with the award of
the construction contract, expected by mid March of 2007. Unfortunately, a number of
additional design services have been required by Caltrans since the authorization of
Amendment No,l. The design of this bridge is unique and challenging to the various
Caltrans divisions responsible for oversight. The Caltrans management staff, from the
outset of this project, has been unable to predict, in advance, specific needs, reports, or
analyses, of the design until the design team was well along in their own development.
Many of the additional requirements have come from independent internal groups in
Caltrans that have traditionally taken a very conservative approach resulting in
unpredictable periods of time to reach their conclusions,
/7{(-1
Printed on Recycled Paper
Much of the additional work covered by this amendment is considered critical and
required by Caltrans to fully complete the design to their satisfaction.
FISCAL IMPACT
The award of Amendment No, 2 to Biggs Cardosa will temporarily encumber $470,000
of City funds from account 428-9449-9300, until grant reimbursement can be
accomplished,
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council Adopt Resolution No, 06- M, authorizing the
City Manager to negotiate and execute Amendment No.2 with Biggs Cardosa Associates
to provide Final Design and Construction Phase Services to the City on the Mary Avenue
Bike & Pedestrian Bridge project for a basic fee not to exceed $420,000, and an
additional fee of $50,000 which may be authorized by the Director of Public Works for
Additional Services, on an as-needed basis, for a total fee not to exceed $470,000,
Submitted by:
Approved for submission to
the City Council:
~c;UdUJ-
Ralph A. Qualls, Jr, V
Director of Public Works
~
David W. Knapp
City Manager
17 ~ -.z
RESOLUTION NO. 06-204
DRAFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE
AMENDMENT NO.2 BETWEEN THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AND BIGGS
CARDOSA ASSOCIATES, FOR FINAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PHASE
SERVICES FOR THE MARY AVENUE BIKE & PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council has been presented a proposal for final design and
construction phase services for the Mary Avenue Bike & Pedestrian Bridge Project; and
WHEREAS, Biggs Cardosa Associates has the necessary expertise, skill and
resources to perform the design and construction phase services required,
NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Cupertino hereby authorizes the City Manager to negotiate and execute Amendment
No.2 with Biggs Cardosa Associates to provide Final Design and Construction Phase
Services to the City on the Mary Avenue Bike & Pedestrian Bridge project for a basic fee
not to exceed $420,000 and an additional fee of $50,000 which may be authorized by the
Director of Public Works for Additional Services, on an as-needed basis, for a total fee
not to exceed $470,000.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 6th day of December 2006, by the following vote:
V ote Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
{tel ~3
City Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3202
(408) 777-3354
FAX (408) 777-3333
CITY OF
CUPEI{JINO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Summary
AGENDA ITEM j'7 b
AGENDA DATE December 6. 2006
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Adopt Resolution No, 06- AO 5", authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and
execute an initial agreement with Swinerton Management & Consulting, Inc., to provide
Construction Management services to the City on the Mary Avenue Bike & Pedestrian
Bridge project for a basic fee not to exceed $600,000.
BACKGROUND
On September 13, 2006, Public Works solicited Requests for Proposals from local and
regional consulting firms to provide construction management services to the City for the
Mary Avenue Bike & Pedestrian Bridge project. A total of four firms submitted
proposals on October 13th. All four firms were determined to be qualified and they were
individually interviewed on November 8th, The four firms, listed below, presented their
selective team members to a five member selection panel made up of Public Works staff,
outside consultants, Caltrans representatives, and design team members,
. . Swinerton Management & Consulting, Inc.
. . Parsons Brinckerhoff Construction Services, Inc,
. . Ghirardelli Associates
. . Lim & Nascimento Engineering
Swinerton presented an experienced team of construction managers whose members have
both design and construction experience on bridges working closely with Caltrans
inspectors, Additionally, one of their sub consultant teams has the singular advantage of
having worked directly with several bridge contractors in developing their cable
tensioning sequences, The same sub consultant team also prepared bridge construction
sequencing criteria for Caltrans that is now a standard throughout California, This degree
of professional expertise and experience in one team is unique and especially valuable to
the City's project.
Ilt'-I
Printed on Recycled Paper
FISCAL IMPACT
The award of the Construction Management services agreement to Swinerton will
temporarily encumber $600,000 of City funds from account 428-9449-9300 until grant
reimbursement can be accomplished.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council Adopt Resolution No, 06- 20 s;- , authorizing
the City Manager to negotiate and execute an initial agreement with Swinerton
Management & Consulting, Inc" to provide Construction Management services to the
City on the Mary Avenue Bike & Pedestrian Bridge project for a basic fee not to exceed
$600,000,
Submitted by:
Approved for submission to
the City Council:
'Zi~Q~~aLAtf
Director of Public Works
~
David W, Knapp
City Manager
I, b- 2-
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO. 06-205
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE
AN INITIAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AND
SWINERTON MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING, INC"
FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
MARY AVENUE BIKE & PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council has been presented a proposal for initial
construction management services for the Mary Avenue Bike & Pedestrian Bridge
Project; and
WHEREAS, Swinerton Management & Consulting, Inc. has the necessary
expertise, skill and resources to perform the construction management services required,
NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Cupertino hereby authorizes the City Manager to negotiate and execute an initial
agreement with Swinerton Management & Consulting, Inc., to provide Construction
Management services to the City on the Mary A venue Bike & Pedestrian Bridge project
for a basic fee not to exceed $600,000.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 6th day of December 2006, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
/1 b--J
City Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3202
(408) 777-3354
FAX (408) 777-3333
CITY Of
CUPEIUINO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Summary
AGENDA ITEM
17c,
AGENDA DATE
December 6. 2006
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Adopt Resolution No, 06- 2..Djp , authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and
execute an Agreement Between the Santa Clara Valley Water District and the City of
Cupertino regarding the Joint Use of Premises, which will allow the City to place a
portion of the Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge foundation within a District right of way,
BACKGROUND
Optimal placement of the Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge southerly tower foundation
requires that the foundation encroach on the right of way ofthe Santa Clara Valley Water
District's Junipero Serra Charmel. The Junipero Serra Channel, a concrete-lined flood
control charmel on the south side of 1-280, will not be materially affected by the
encroachment of the foundation into its right of way. Nor will the bridge foundation be
materially affected by the proximity of the channel. However, in order to allow the
bridge tower foundation to encroach into the channel right of way, the District has
requested that the City and District negotiate and execute a joint use of premises
agreement. The agreement is intended to define the rights and responsibilities of both
parties and to assure mutual benefit for the facilities of both parties,
FISCAL IMPACT
There will be no fiscal impact associated with this action,
I/~'-(
Printed on Recycled Paper
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council Adopt Resolution No, 06- 26 ~ , authorizing
the City Manager to negotiate and execute an Agreement Between the Santa Clara Valley
Water District and the City of Cupertino regarding the Joint Use of Premises, which will
allow the City to place a portion of the Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge foundation
within a District right of way,
Submitted by:
Approved for submission to
the City Council:
~~ua~U "U~
Director of Public Works
~
. David W. Knapp
City Manager
lIt - 2-
RESOLUTION NO. 06-206
DRAFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE
A JOINT USE OF PREMISES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF CUPERTINO AND SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the City has been requested to enter into a joint use of premises
agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Water District to allow encroachment into the
right of way of the Junipero Serra Channel for a portion of the Mary Avenue Bike &
Pedestrian Bridge Project; and,
WHEREAS, the City has the need to encroach upon a portion of the Junipero
Serra Channel, to properly construct the Mary Avenue Bike & Pedestrian Bridge,
NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Cupertino hereby authorizes the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Joint Use of
Premises Agreement with the Santa Clara Valley Water District which will allow the City
to place a portion of the Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge foundation within a District
right of way.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 6th day of December 2006, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
(;C-J
, ".,'
l,':"
/
~
1
j
l:
li.
i, ~1 '"
':'..~l.;;~'
, '
l
!
, .
""I' ,
. .
.J
,f,
t \.
~""t',~}~,
. 'I
I
,;
"
;
l~
i
r:
""
I
. 'If'
!
_",0
, ;"1::'
<t.
J
;, l'
f
:.
,I. '
. "
" iI,,","
" ,,1\
...J
'<
'.( ~A...~' '
"',1 ,,-
" t"l-
',. ~
j,
,
'-1
!
, l
J
l.
"::
~.