CC 01-17-95 CC-894
MINUTES
Cupertino City Council
Regular Adjourned Meeting
January 17, 1995
CALL TO ORDER
At 6:45 p.m., Mayor Dean called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300
Torre Avenue, Cupertino, and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL
Council members present: John Bautista, Don Burnett, Barbara Koppel (6:50 p.m.),
Lauralee Sorensen and Mayor Wally Dean. Council members absent: None.
Staff present: City Manager Don Brown; City Clerk Klm Smith; Administrative Services
Director Carol Atwood; Community Development Director Bob Cowan; City Attorney
Charles Kilian; Parks and Recreation Director Steve Dowiing; Public Information Officer
Donna Krey; and Public Works Director Bert Viskovich.
CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Dean asked for a moment of silence in recognition of U.S. Amy Sgt. First Class
Gregory Cardott, a former resident of Cupertino, who was killed in Haiti.
POSTPONEMENTS
Staff requested continuation of item Nos. 16, 17, and 18. No individuals wished to speak
on these public hearings. Council concurred to continue the items to February 6, 1995.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Ms. Mary Lou Lyon, 879 Lilly Avenue, distributed copies of a letter to the City Manager
dated January 13 in regard to dedicating a monument to Elisha Stephens at Blackberry
Farm on April 1. She asked for a letter of endorsement from the City Council to the
Santa Clara County Historical Heritage Commission in support of the monument. Ms.
Lyon also asked that Council correct the spelling of Stevens Creek Boulevard to read
Stephens Creek Boulevard. The City Manager said that he would prepare a letter of
endorsement of the Elisha Stephens monument for the Mayor's signature.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Sorensen moved to approve the consent agenda as presented. Burnett seconded and the
motion carried 4-0 with Koppel absent.
' · Sanum'y 17, 1995 Cupertino City Council Page
14. Request from Homestead High School Athletic Booster Club for waiver of use fee
at the Quinlan Community Center for fund raiser.
Vote Members of the City Conncil
AYES: Bautista, Burnett, Dean, and Sorensen.
NOES: None
ABSENT: Koppel
ABSTAIN: None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
15. Public hearing regarding annual renewal of bingo permits: (a) St. Joseph of
Cupertino Church, 10110 North DeAnza Boulevard; (b) International Order of
Odd Fellows, Cupertino Lodge #70, 20598 Homestead Road.
The City Manager reviewed the staff report, said this was a routine matter, and
that staff recommended approval. Dean opened the public hearing. No one
wished to speak, and the public hearing was closed. Sorensen moved to renew the
two bingo pemlits. Bantista seconded, and the motion carried 4-0 with Koppel
absent.
16. Application Nos. 81,156 and 9-EA-94 - City of Cupertino. Amendments to
various sections of Chapter 19.40 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, Residential
Hillside Zones, regarding regulations for flat yard area, second story off-sets and
house sizes. Environmental Detetnfination: The Planning Commission
recommends the granting of Negative Declaration. Recommended for approval.
(Continued from January 3, 1995; staff requests eont'm~ance to February 6, 1995.)
(a) First reading of Ordinance No. 1658: "An Ordinance of the City Council
of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 19.40, Residential Hillside
Zones, of the Cupertino Municipal Code."
Under "Postponements," this item was continued to February 6.
17. Application Nos. 1-Z-94 and 2-EA-94 - City of Cupertino. Request for rezoning
of various hillside properties encompassing 185 net acres in the Regnart Canyon
area, located in the west foothills of Cupertino. Environmental Determination:
The Planning Commission recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration.
Recommended for approval. (Continued from January 3, 1995; staff requests
continuance to Febnmry 6, 1995.)
January 17, 1995 Cupertino City Council Page 4
.... a) First reading of Ordinance No. 1659: "An Ordipance of the City Council
of the City of Cupertino Amending Title 19 of the Cupertino Municipal
Code by Rezoning Various Hillside Properties Encompassing Approxi-
mately 185 Net Acres in the Regnart Canyon Area; Located in the West
Foothills of Cupertino."
Under "Postponements," this item was continued to Febpmry 6.
18. Resolution No. 9275: Ordering vacation of a roadway easement located on the
north side of Stevens Creek Boulevard, north of Jap. ice Avenue. (Staff requests
contin-ance to February 6, 1995.)
Under "Postponements," this item was continued to Febru_a_ry 6.
At 6:50 p.m., Koppel was present.
PLANNING APPLICATIONS
19. Applications 11-TM-94 and 25-EA-94 - Landmark Development - Tentative map
to subdivide a .27 acre parcel into six lots; project located on Rainbow Drive, 390
It. east of Gardenside Drive. Environmental Det~mdnation: The Planning
· - Commission recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration. Recommended
for approval.
The Community Development Director reviewed the staff report.
Sorensen moved to grant a Negative Declaration. Bautista seconded, and the
motion carried 5-0.
Sorensen moved to approve the tentative map per Planning Commission
Resolution No. 4581. Baufista seconded, and the motion carded 4-1 with Bumett
voting no.
20. Applications 6-U-84 and 33-EA-94 - Tandem Computers (Carlos Murphy's) - Use
permit modification to relocate and construct a new parking lot. Located west of
Wolfe Road, north of 280. Environmental Detetrr, inafion: The Planning
Commission recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration. Recommended
for approval.
The Community Development Director reviewed the staff report.
Sorensen moved to grant a Negative Declaration. Burner seconded, and the
motion carried 5-0.
Sorensen moved to approve the use permit application per Planning Commission
Resolution No. 4582. Koppel seconded, and the motion canSed 5-0.
Ian,,~,ry 17, 1995 Cupertino City Council Page 5
NEW BUSINESS
21. Appointment to North Central and Northwest Flood Control Zone Advisory
Committee, Santa Clara Valley Water Commission.
Koppel moved to appoint Council member Don Burnett and Public Works
Director Bert Viskovich as the representative and the alternate to thc committee.
Sorensen seconded, and the motion carried 5-0.
22. First reading of Ordinance No. 1677: "An Ordinance of the City Council of thc
City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 1.09 of the Cupertino Municipal Code
Relating to Nuisance Abatement."
The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Sorensen moved and Koppcl
seconded to read the ordinance by rifle only, and that the City Clerk's reading
would constitute the first reading thereof. Motion carded 5-0.
23. Ratification of Saratoga Councilman Don Wolfe as the alternate to thc Santa Clara
County Transit District.
Koppel explained that appointing Don Wolfe would not have any impact on the
· - City's tem~ of representation on the Transit District when she left the Council in
November. Koppel moved to appoint Don Wolfe as the alternate to the Transit
Dish/ct. Burnett seconded, and the motion carried 5-0.
24. Response to Santa Clara County Planning Commission referral of application to
modify and extend use permit for the Stevens Creek Quarry.
The Director of Community Development reviewed the staff report, which he said
contained history from the early 1980s.
Dean said he had received calls regarding vehicle traffic and county issues. One
of the most prominent concerns was about the speed of the trucks and how it can
be regulated. Another was that even though the agreement specified that the gate
closes at 5:00 p.m. with 39 days that it can remain open until 8:30, there are
reports that traffic continues until midnight. He asked the city attorney what
options there were regarding these complaints.
Cowan said that hours of operation are controlled by the conditions of approval,
but they have not been enforced.
The mayor opened the public hearing.
Dean Sa) re, 10808 S. Stevens Canyon Road, had distributed a letter dated January
17, 1995. He said there has been a constant problem and they have constantly
complained to John Gibbs with the county board of supervisors, but he did not
January 17, 1995 Cupertino City Council Page 6
know that he should have been complaining to planning or code enforcement.
The fact that the city has no record of complaints does not mean that there were
not any made. Mr. Sayre said he had neighbors who talked about moving because
of the trucks and their speed, etc. He said that notice of the meeting was very
short and didn't allow time to provide an effective response to council. Mr. Sayre
said he and his neighbors feel Council needs to take a strong look at the request,
and although Council is in favor of recycling at the qnarry, there are questions th_at
should be answered clearly before that is approved.
Lyn Faust, 11033 Canyon Vista Drive, said she was representing herself and 61
homeowners at as Rancho Deep Cliff on Stevens Canyon Road. She read a letter
asking council to: (1) Suggest to the county the shortest reasonable use permit
term, preferably 5-10 years; and (2) To be extremely firm with suggested
consequences in obtaining their compliance with the monitoring/logging
conditions of the use permit. She agreed that the regulation of truck traffic has
been the primary issue with the quarry. Further, she said the majority of
complaints relate to truck noise that occurs late at night or early in the morning,
both of which fall outside the conditions of the use permit. She did not agree with
the county's finding that the actaml number of equipment was not a consideration.
If it is assumed that the q~arry is abiding by most of the conditions of the permit,
then the trucks on the road at those hours must be operating under the grandfather
- clause. She asked the city to request that these ancillary-operations trucks abide
by the same hours that were deemed reasonable and fair for qnarry operations in
the use permit. She expressed surprise that the report showed that traffic volume
on Stevens Canyon Road has remained relatively constant in the last four years,
showing only a gain of 50 cars. There have been many new homes built in the
area, plus commuters use the road as a cut through. She said it might be true that
the planning and code enforcement departments had not received complaints, but
Council should not assume that there were no abuses. People from her
development directed their complaints to the county planning depaxi~iient, because
they are responsible for monitoring truck traffic issues. She has records dating
back to 1991 of trucks she observed out of pemfit hours. After recording license
numbers and names on trucks, she reported to county planning and was told that
no permission had been requested by the q~!arry for off-hours operation. Also,
there was no system in place for recording such requests if they were made, so
how would anyone know when the nla,ximum 39 work evenings per year had been
reached? Annual reports which were to contain monthly truck traffic tallies were
not being filed. The lack of baseline data or record keeping makes complaining a
meaningless gesture since there is no basis for comparison and no consequences
for lack of compliance. She said her written report contained a portion about the
length of the use pemfit and why she feels it would be reasonable to request a
shorter period. Ms. Faust said they are asking: (1) To have no quarry-related
_ truck traffic, either permit or non-conforming use, operating on Stevens Canyon
Road late at night or before 6:00 a.m.; (2) That the county adhere to the
conditions of the use petff, it and that they maintain logs for monthly truck traffic
via annual report, complaints received and exceptions to regular operating hours;
Sanuary 17, 1995 Cupertino City Council Page 7
(3) and restrict the term of the use permit to 5-10 years to encourage more
frequent joint examination of the issues.
David Severin, 22570 San Snan Road, on the corner of Stevens Canyon,
complained that the tracks go by beginning at 5:00 a.m. According to the State of
California and the statutes of the county, the hours of legal trucking are 8:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m. He objected to the city being railroaded by the quarry into giving
them a 20-year permit when they are already in violation. If operations could be
restricted from 6:00 a.m. on, he might be agreeable to it. However, they have
been known to run until midnight or 2:00 a.m. He was opposed to any activity
that is not between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Mr. Severin expressed
concern about pollution from the q~_~arry to Stevens Creek Dam.
James Sines said he had been working at the Severin ranch for a few years and
watched the trucks go by. He didn't understand why they need to run late at night
except to make more money and disrupt people in the neighborhood.
Burnett said the conditions of approval are quite restrictive and if they were
followed none of the problems heard tonight would be occurring. The county has
a responsibility to adhere to them. He said the city needs to work with the county
to make this renewal as short as possible, and to can get the quarry to follow the
county's conditions.
Sorensen said her concerns were that even though violations had been reported to
Mr. Gibbs and county planning, council has no reports from them, and no one
seems to be following up on the complaints. She agreed with Burnett regarding
the length of the use permit and asked if it could come back in a year.
Cowan said they could ask for the quarry's anmml report. He agreed with Burner
that if the conditions were met the problems would not exist. It all comes down to
county code enforcement.
Koppel said she had spoken to Mr. Sayre and to John Gibbs about reinstating the
good neighbor committee. It seems to be working for the Kaiser situation, and to
have a separate one for the quarry would be a good way to go. If council re-enacts
the good neighbor committee, including the county, they could then deal with
these particular issues and make recommendations which would have to go to the
county. All council can do now is make an initial recommendation.
Bautista said he agreed with all that had been said, but said condition Nos. 14 and
25 needed to be reviewed. Condition 14 refers only to loading and hauling
operations. He suggested amending the condition to include loading, hauling and
other operations related to the quarry, to make it clear there are no exceptions to
that rule. Bautista said he thought condition number 25 provides a loophole
because it allows evening hours-of-operation from 5:00-8:00 p.m. up to 39 work
evenings a year. This comes out to 8 weeks based on a five day week, and that
January 17, 1995 Cupertino City Council Page 8
was a significant impact. He suggested eliminating condition 25 except for an
emergency situation, and not to define how many evenings would be allowed.
Bautista said he liked the suggestion that they require the quarry to maintain logs
of trucks. He said the city needs to have a mechanism for record keeping, not just
monitoring complaints but actually having data as to the number of trucks, and the
hours of operation. He said the idea of an annual report makes sense, and he
would support a five-year term in order to maintain the city's ability to monitor
the situation. He asked staff if there was any information about the runoff from
the quany polluting the dam.
Mr. Cowan stated that was also one of the conditions of approval. He didn't
know to what degree it has been evaluated, but the water district and county
planning would be involved in that. He didn't know of other conditions that had
been put in place except those placed by the conditions of approval.
Koppel expressed a concern with just giving a five-year extension because she
didn't think the board of supervisors would agree. The initial request was for 25
years, and stalThad recommended a 15-20 year period. She said she would rather
come up with something less that the board will accept, maybe 15 or 20.
Burnett thought it was very important to build a case, including any
documentation available as to what's happening. Ms. Faust indicated that she has
some logs regarding hours of operation of trucks and other information which
might be useful in building the case. He said the documentation was very
restrictive, and it seems that the county intended to enforce these controls, but that
had not happened. He said it was perfectly reasonable to ask for five years
because the job isn't getting done and the residents are not being protected.
It was moved by Burnett to send a letter to the board of supervisors requesting
that the permit be extended for no more than five years, giving as the reason that
there is an impact on Cupertino's residents because apparently the conditions of
the use pe~fx-~it are not being enforced, and that the city requests that the county
work with the residents and the City of Cupertino to enforce the conditions that
are given for operating the q~arry. Koppel seconded.
Bautista amended the motion to include provisions for data collection, to make it
clear the city is asking for a five-year term so data can be collected and evaluated,
using mechanisms such as maintaining logs, truck speed, numbers of complaints
and hours of operation. The amendment also included re-instatement of the good
neighbor committee.
Burnett and Koppel concurred with the amendment, and the motion carried 5-0.
25. First reading of Ordinance No. 1678: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the
City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 2.48 of the Cupertino Municipal Code,
Departmental Organization."
· ' January 17, 1995 Cupertino City Council Page 9
The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance and noted that paragraph
2.48.020.A.1.c. should read "Human Resource Division" instead of "General
Services Division"
Koppel moved and Bumett seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that
the City Clerk's reading would constitute the first reading thereof. Motion carried
5-0.
26. Electronic access to City Council meetings.
The City Manager presented a report prepared as a follow up to the last council
meeting.
Discussion followed regarding the appropriate length of time for a test period, and
the need for flexibility in case the process needed to be adjusted.
Brown clarified the portion of the report that talked about messages received prior
to a meeting. The messages would not be ignored, but there might not be time to
make copies for distribution prior to the meeting. Instead, they would be kept on
the computer and reviewed at the appropriate time.
Bautista asked how the public would be infmmed of the new way to communicate
with city hall, and whether it would be for agenda items only or if it would
include general comments on items that were not on the agenda. He suggested a
limit on the number of words in a message, just as speakers are limited to three
minutes. Bautista asked if the public who views the meeting or are present would
have an opportunity to view or hear the message, maybe via the overhead
projector or reading the message aloud. He said he would like to be sure that ail
messages sent to the council would be received by all council members during a
meeting. This might require a "gatekeeper", and perhaps the Public Information
Officer would be the best person for that. Bautista asked staff how the wireless
notebook computers would work. He also thought the identity of the message
sender should be disclosed, and if it is not, the message should not be shown. The
roles should be put in place now.
Brown said that if Council approved the trial period, there will be publicity in the
newspapers, in the Cupertino Scene on the City Channel, and on CityNet since
subscribers to that service will probably be the ones who will use it the most, at
least initially. Regarding non-agenda items, people can use CityNet or Interact to
communicate with the city staffor with council. If those are general inquiries and
not specifically requested to be part of an agenda item, they will not be included at
the meetings. If the message comes in during the oral communications portion of
the meeting, council would deal with it like other oral communications. Brown
agreed with the proposal to limit the number of words in a message to a three
minute equivalent. At this time the messages would be read aloud by the public
Jan.ary 17, 1995 Cupertino City Council Page 10
information officer, but there might be a way to display them in the future. Brown
said that ail messages come to the same mailbox and there would not be an
opportunity for private messages during the meeting.
The Director of Public Works explained that the computers will use a transmitting
unit and the messages will be passed along a series of electroliers. Everything will
be wireless at council members' stations instead of hooked up to a modem.
Council members will need an attachment for their power books and the public
information officer will have a standard computer at her location.
Dean said that he would request that computer users provide their name and
address, just as those who speak at the podium are asked to do. That information
could be checked against their electronic address in order have some
accountability of the users implementing the system.
The City Attorney said these communications would be considered free speech, as
much as comments made by a speaker at the podium, and neither the city nor the
employees have a right to censor it. People are asked to voluntarily sign the
"request to speak" cards, but they are not required to reveal their name and
address and cannot be precluded from speaking. He said that setting time limits
has been upheld as a reasonable method of conducting business, and it would be
possible to adopt a word limit if it were deemed necessary. It is important to treat
the interactive mode the same as if it were oral communications by a live person
at a meeting.
Dean stated that there will be an electronic address on all messages and he hoped
messages would be brief. Viskovich added that those who could gain access are
CityNet or Interact subscribers, or anyone who uses gateways such as Prodigy,
CompuServe or America on Line. Internet users should be aware that their
message might take an hour or longer to be received, and users will not be
receiving a reply. To have an opportunity for questions and answers, it would
make more sense to come speak in person. Bautista said while council is
evaluating the system, he would like to receive input from the public.
Bumett said that he liked the idea because it would give council a chance to
receive more input. He was not concerned about extraneous input because council
can choose to ignore it. If someone from another city has a good idea, this city
might benefit from it. He suggested a maximum length of one typewritten page.
Burnett moved to approve staff's recommendations for a trial period of 6 months
beginning at the Febr~mry 6, 1995, meeting and concluding after the July 17,
1995, meeting, to set a limit of 1 type-written page for communications via
_ computer, and to review the program at the _li~e. ~g~d~aidhbefimanueeth~ their
in August. Sorensen seconded, and the motion carried 5-0.
lanuory 17, 1995 Cupertino City Council Page 11
27. Acceptance of Margaret Zipp's resignation from the Library Commission and
setting dates for filing deadline and interviews.
The City Clerk reviewed the staff report. She explained that the unscheduled
vacancy had been posted as required by law, and Council could choose to appoint
the individual they interviewed last week, or could continue to receive
applications.
Koppel moved to appoint Mr. Charles Pow to the unscheduled vacancy. Burner
seconded, and the motion carried 5-0.
ORDINANCES
28. Second reading and enactment of Ordinance No. 1675: "An Ordinance of the
Council of the City of Cupertino Repealing and Reenacting Chapter 1.08 of the
Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to Right of Entry for Inspection."
The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Koppel moved and Burner
seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading
would constitute the second reading thereof. Motion carried 5-0.
Koppel moved and Bumett seconded to enact Ordinance No..1675 Motion
carded 5-0.
29. Second reading and enach'nent of Ordinance No. 1676: "An Ordinance of the
Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 11.04 of the Cupertino
Municipal Code Relating to Abatement of Abandoned Vehicles."
The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Koppel moved and Burnett
seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading
would constitute the second reading thereof. Motion can'ied 5-0.
Koppel moved and Burner seconded to enact Ordinance No. 1676 Motion
carried 5-0.
STAFF REPORTS
Viskovich presented a status report on the winter storms. He said the city had
been fortunate overall and he noted the damage and power outages that had
occurred. He noted that Stevens Creek Dara is full and would be monitored. He
explained that PG&E suffered a lot of primary outages and had a difficult time
restoring power. Their phone lines were overloaded, but the city will have some
direct communication with them for the next emergency so that perhaps we can
assist them.
January 17, 1995 Cupertino City Council Page 12
Mr. Brown said he thought that the way the city was engineered and designed
reduced the potential problems. He commended the public works department for
their work over the years.
The City Manager reviewed his report regarding a proposal to expand the number
of Sheriff patrol vehicles equipped with radar capabilities. He had spoken with
the West Side Commander and Saratoga's city manager on this topic. Presently
there are four radar units in Cupertino which are all traffic units and are assigned
high-priority traffic enforcement areas. However, they are not able to provide the
neighborhood enforcement that people want which is what the beat officers
typically do. The beat officers do not have radar units, so if they need special
enforcement they have to schedule a traffic person to do that, which is
inconvenient. The proposal is to go in with Saratoga on a large purchase which
would cost the city less than $2,000 a year. This would not require a budget
adjustiiient because there are savings far in excess of that from the booking fee
settlement just achieved. It would add 11 radar units to patrol cars and they could
be used at the discretion of the beat officer. Cupertino is post~t for radar
enforcement throughout and this would allow quicker and more effective response
to neighborhood speeding concerns.
The Parks and Recreation Director reviewed his staff report on the mid-year status
of the Sports Center operations. He said there are approximately 421 members
now.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Koppel said Joint Venture is meeting at the Quinlan Center Thursday at 7:45 a.m.
The Mayor's/City Managers are meeting with Jim Cuneen this Friday at 9:00 a.m.
Sorensen reported on the Youth School Community Safety Task Force meeting
held last week. There will be a camp in April for non-traditional leaders. There
will 20 students from grades 9-11 from each high school. The emphasis will be to
get the weapons out of the schools and off the campuses. This was done in San
Jose earlier this year and was highly successful so Fremont High School District
is going to do it and possibly invite eighth graders to attend as well.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:10 p.m. the Council concurred to adjourn to Monday, February 6, at 6:15 p.m. for
the purpose of interviewing candidates for the Affordable Housing Committee.
Kim Marie Smith
CC-893A
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Regular Adjourned Meeting
Januaxy 10, 1995
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m. in Conference Room A, Cupertino City Hall, 10300 Tone Avenue.
ROLL CALL
Council members present: John Bautista, Don Bumett, Barbara Koppel, Lauralee Sorensen, and Mayor
Wally Dean.
Staffpresent: City Clerk Kim Smith.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
NEW BUSINESS
Interviews and appointments to boards, commissions, and committees.
Mr. Harry Barnett was interviewed first to allow him to attend another appointment that evening. He
withdrew his application from the Parks and Recreation Commission and requested the Fine Arts
Commission instead. Mr. Barnett was interviewed for the vacancies on the Library Commission and the
Fine Arts Commission.
Plznni~g Commission
The following individuals were interviewed for two vacancies:
William Betts, Donna Austin, Robert Levy, and Orrin Mahoney.
Koppel moved to appoint Ms. Austin and Mr. Mahoney to temps ending January 1999. Sorensen
seconded, and the motion carried 5-0.
Affordable Housir~g Committee
Since two of the three applicants were not present, Council concurred to defer these interviews until their
next meeting.
Cable Television Advisoo' Committee
The following individuals were interviewed for three vacancies:
Mike Wincn, Samuel MacNeal, Ernest Tsui, Scot Southworth, and Paul Rodwick.
JannarylO, 1995 Cupertino City Council Page 2
Koppel moved to appoint Mr. Winch and Mr. Rodwick to terms ending January 1999, and to conduct
another ballot between Mr. Tsui and Mr. Southworth. Burner seconded and the motion ca~ried 5-0.
After the second ballot, Koppel moved to appoint Mr. Tsui to the partial term. Burner seconded and the
motion carried 5-0.
Fine Arts Commission
Mr. Andrew Spfingmeyer was interviewed. Mr. Barnett was previously interviewed and also considered.
Sorensen moved to appoint Mr. Springmeyer and Mr. Barnett to the temps ending Sammry 1999. Baufista
seconded, and the motion carried 5-0.
!.ibrary Commission
The following individuals were interviewed for two vacancies:
Jean Bedord, Jilian Hamer, and Charles Pow. Mr. Barnett was previous interviewed and
was also considered.
Koppel moved to appoint Ms. Bedord and Ms. Hamer to terms ending Jannary 1999. Bautista seconded,
and the motion carded 5-0.
Parka and Recreation Commission
The following individuals were interviewed for two vacancies:
Ralph Riddle, Howard Johnson, Robert Levy, Dick Lohmiller, Roxaune Beverstein, and Robert
Hopkins.
Koppel moved to appoint Mr. Lohmiller and Mr. Hopkins to terms ending January 1999.
Sorensen seconded, and the motion carried 5-0.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:05 p.m., Council concurred to adjourn to Tuesday, January 17, 1995, in Conference Room A, to
conduct interviews for the Affordable Housing Committee, and then to the Council Chambers at 6:45 p.m.
for regular items of business.
Klm Marie Smith
City Clerk