The URL can be used to link to this page

02 Vallco Shopping Center I CITY OF CUPEIQ'INO City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 Fax: (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department Summary Agenda Item No. :;.. Agenda Date: October 18, 2006 Application: M-2006-05, ASA-2006-19 (EA-2006-18) Applicant: Mike Rohde (Vallco Shopping Center) Property Location: 10123 N. Wolfe Road, APN 316-20-064 APPLICATION SUMMARIES: USE PERMIT AMENDMENT to allow the parking garage north of Macy's to exceed the permitted 32-foot height limit and to allow access to parking on the fourth level. ARCHITECTURAL & SITE APPROVAL to allow the parking garage north of Macy's to exceed the permitted 32-foot height limit and to allow access to parking on the fourth level. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed garage modification with staff's recommended noise and visual mitigation measures. BACKGROUND: The applicant, Mike Rohde of Vallco Fashion Park, is requesting approval to allow the parking garage north of Macy's to exceed the 32-foot height limit in order to access parking on the fourth level. The location of the parking garage is vested in the Vallco Development Agreement. On January 17, 2006, the City Council approved the garage not to exceed 32-feet with the exception of a 49 foot elevator tower. The Council stipulated as part of the approval that: There is an intention to not approve any more height to the structure in the future (See Exhibit A). The applicant is aware of the Council's intent but feels that the extra stalls on the fourth level are vital to support the center's expansion and the structure can be designed to maintain a low profile and respect the relationships to the adjoining neighbors. DISCUSSION: Garage Height The maximum 32-foot height limit was previously defined by the City Council to include any apparatus above the roof level of the garage, including railings and parapet J-/ Applications: M-2006-05, ASA-2006-19 (EA-2006-18) Vallco Parking Garage Page 2 walls relative to the grade height at the neighbor's rear yards. In addition, the reference of height shall be taken from the average effective grade of the adjacent residential grade. The intent of the garage height limit is to minimize the views of the west wall of the garage nearest to the residential neighbors. Currently the garage construction is nearing completion. The garage is built at three stories/ four levels (with the fourth level being the roof level) and is approximately 1 to 2 feet under the specified 32-foot height limit to the top of the fourth level parking deck. Cars will be able to park from the ground level to the third level. However, in order for cars to park on the fourth level (roof level), a minimum four foot solid railing must be constructed around the perimeter of the roof thus increasing the height of the structure approximately 3 feet over the maximum 32 foot height limit. Please see the following illustration: ~\ ~ So ~ E~.:: 'o... N , ~ J~l...!:-.L...1'=-.l..O;.;g N , .~ .~-f::L..J.,,"..1.~~ ~ ..!!\'P._P:-.l___~I.-_l1 RELATIVE GROUND PLANE AT NEIGHBORS YARD (el. 183.Q') Staff recommends that the proposed cable railing along the west perimeter of the garage be revised to a solid parapet wall to help screen activities/ noises on the ramp (see Visual Impacts) and also that the required green screen be extended to buffer the parapet wall. Staff believes that the additiona13-foot height extension will not pose )---;( Applications: M-2006-05, ASA-2006-19 (EA-2006-18) Vallco Parking Garage Page 3 significant visual impacts to the neighbors provided that the several key mitigation measures (discussed below) are in place and will actually help minimize visual impacts. Visual The parking garage is approximately 83 feet away from the residential properties. Given this distance, the addition of a four foot westerly perimeter railing or wall will not negatively impact the neighbors' views to the garage (see cross section below). (A' '~( rP1! !T'C" _"""\ I "- y~i:/:i r 8~'- TO Il~) -,._._~.......-'-------,!<- 2C-::1" SECTION BB V allco' s objective is to allow access to park customer's vehicles on the roof level of the parking garage. If the fourth level parking field is significantly setback from the westerly edge of the garage and screened by a six foot sound attenuation wall such that the extra parking is virtually invisible from the rear yards of the adjacent homes then the visual impacts of the fourth level parking garage is no greater than the existing parking structure. In order to achieve Vallco's objectives and at the same time shield views to the 4th level parking field, staff recommends the Council require the following mitigation options: 1. Delete 16 stalls from the 3rd level ramp (see Figure 1). 2. Require a minimum 6-foot noise attenuation wall along gridline B (see Figure 2). 3. Require a solid 4-foot parapet wall along the ramp from the 3rd level to the 4th level to help screen automobile activities and buffer noise impacts (see Figure 3). 4. Provide additional barricades on the 3rd level ramp (after the 32-foot height limit) that will channel cars approximately 20 feet further away from the westerly edge of the garage (see Figure 4). 5. In order to enhance the aesthetics of the garage, metal grids or trellises shall be proposed along the south, north and east elevation. 6. The existing triple rows of mature trees shall be maintained and preserved. A minimum of 20 additional trees shall be planted along the existing sound wall at ).. -3 Applications: M-2006-05, ASA-2006-19 (EA-2006-18) Vallco Parking Garage Page 4 strategic locations and along the west side of the parking garage to further enhance the visual screening. i i 1 i i~...l j i i i i D~lefe ~6 ~talfs ~n ~he iRa~Pi I I I I I I I I I i -4-- -+{lr-~--L- - I ---l-- i ~__ i +- i -+- i i-:: __ i T-- -+{lr-~--~ - i ~ i 1- !~.-- i.~_ Figure 1 i i i i i i i I i ! 6'4"0 Screerl Wall! i I I I I I I ! ! i I I I I i I I I I I I i I I I I ! ! i i i i i i i i ,ii i i i i i i i i ! I--r-TTTTT !-1-:/'~'11::: ... 1_~~-, . -1- i i i i i i i .4 '-. . i Iii T' ! I I I I I I I ._~ I ..,.." J) -t-- --t- -==r-- I ~"~' --r- =r ........d.. -+--fil\-- - I 4--- i -i---;_ i -+--- i -+--- I 1""""::__ i .,......... -+-*--~ - ~ ~ :;=== .$, i I ~ ~+~~~~~: Figure 2 ;2-1 Applications: M-2006-05, ASA-2006-19 (EA-2006-18) Vallco Parking Garage Page 5 (1) (iO\ I' (ij (i) (t) (5) ~, Ci) (8) , r 1 , 1 r r T ,'-.lI'" H',O. ,,-,_,' "'_~. .,._~' "'-;;" "'.-0' ,ft"__)" 1.-')" ,,'.," (9) '10) 'n' '121 T \ 'f ! (r~~~(7~'~i (&-_.---:-- - i i i j i Iii So~id ~I:' -ci" rlarJpet ~al1 II III I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I i I i I I i ~,q Ii :: r /(j-j, 'J t-. : I 1"'- ~) (~>---------- @--~--- - I I I I I "A~" I'J.: ,A"ACf:, Ph 1'.,111 : FD ~6' ;-.J;'.~:<I\C ~'p.A.Ct:.S A[:Cl:.D 1':5 '..!F.;';'< he SP.;Cf..S \C11AL /U9 Figure 3 , i ~'I I I ' i(!~"---- --- ----- JJ -;- ~ -t ~-4/!I -r I"" --l -+-ftl\-- - I -<<l-- i ~__ i +- i +- i 1--:__ i 1- -+-~--~ - i r- i .l- !r13 i " , __ Figure 4 J.-5 Applications: M-2006-05, ASA-2006-19 (EA-2006-18) Vallco Parking Garage Page 6 Noise A noise assessment was performed by the Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. on October 11, 2006. The report assessed the existing noise environment (ambient noise level) at the property line of the residential receivers west of the project site. The sound level meter was located approximately 80 feet from the westerly boundary of the parking garage. The assessment indicates that the predominant ambient noise source at this location was local and distant vehicular traffic (Hwy. 280 and/ or Wolfe Rd.). The hourly average noise levels ranged from 52 dBA to 62 dBA during the day and 48 dBA to 55 dBA at night. These figures account for the construction noises during the day time and conform to the City's Noise Ordinance (65 dBA daytime & 55 dBA nighttime). The City's Noise Ordinance also prescribes brief incidental noise exceedances (Lmax) of the daytime noise limits. Theoretically, the incidental maximum noise limits are more restrictive since a maximum noise level greater than 80dBA could be generated by an activity over a short period of time; however, the average noise level could continue to be less than 60 dBA when averaged out over a longer period of time. Therefore the maximum noise level limits would be the most restrictive limits for noises occurring within the parking garage. To assess the noise impacts resulting from the project, it is important to first assess noise levels generated by the permitted 3 level parking garage. Since the parking garage would be operational during daytime and nighttime hours, the applicable daytime maximum noise level limit (Lmax) would be 80 dBA and the applicable nighttime maximum noise level (Lmax) would be 70 dBA. A sample study of a similar garage located at the downtown in the City of Petaluma was used as a prototype to compare and project the noise levels that will be expected from the V allco' s garage. The Petaluma parking garage has 4 levels of parking sitting on top of gro~nd floor commercial uses comprising a five story structure. A series of noise measurements were made approximately 75 feet from the Petaluma garage to quantify noise levels from the regularly occurring noise sources on levels 2 to 5. At each parking level, a car door was opened and closed several times, the engine was started, and the auto's horn was sounded. This series of noise-generating' events was repeated at each parking level at the nearest parking stall to the edge of the garage and at a distance of 50 feet from the edge of the parking garage. Noise measurements were also made as the auto traveled up and down the parking garage. The events generating the highest noise levels were the auto horns. Maximum noise levels were also higher on intermediate levels (levels 2, 3, 4) because of the reverberation of sound within the garage and reflection of noise that would be absent on the open roof level. The maximum noise levels generated on the roof level were the. lowest. In all instances the recorded noise data reflects that the incidental noises generated by the parking garage would be at or below ambient maximum noise levels currently experience in adjacent residential rear yards. d--~ Applications: M-2006-05, ASA-2006-19 (EA-2006-18) Vallco Parking Garage Page 7 The report concluded that the proposed project would not generate noise levels exceeding the limits presented in the Municipal Code or substantially increase noise levels resulting from the operation of the permitted 3-level parking garage. The additional level of parking would be shielded from residential receives to the west by the exiting and proposed noise barriers. In addition, the noise levels generated by activities on the 4th level of the parking garage would be below the noise emanating from the intermediate levels of the permitted 3-story structure and be ator below ambient maximum noise levels that result from vehicular traffic along the perimeter road. As part of the previous approval, sound baffling panels is required to be installed along the west and partial north and south elevations. Staff recommends that the sound baffling panels completely infill and seal off gaps in each of the garage bay openings. Lighting The applicant is proposing a total of Slight poles on the 4th level parking field. Four- 16 foot light poles are going to be along gridline B and four - 20 foot light poles are going to be along gridline C. Please refer to the attached photometric plans and lighting details for additional information. Staff has requested the applicant to provide a cross section showing that these lights will not be in the line of sight as viewed from the adjacent residential rear yards. In order to minimize any potential glare from the light standards on the rooftop, staff is recommending that the Council implement the following measures: 1. The light poles along gridline B shall be deleted and replaced with inboard lights with cut-shield within the proposed 6-foot noise attenuation wall as mentioned previously in the staff report. 2. The applicant shall work with staff to reduce the height of the light poles along gridline C to no higher than 12 to 14 feet measured from the ground. 3. The applicant shall submit a lighting control plan indicating early shut-off schedules for the roof level lights. 4. The applicant shall provide a report from a professional lighting expert confirming that the intensity and number of lights on the 4th level are minimized and reduced to the maximum extent possible. ENVIRONMENT AL REVIEW COMMITTEE (ERC) On September 13, 2006, the Environmental Review Committee (ERe) reviewed the project and recommended a mitigated negative declaration provided that the visual, noise and lighting impacts to the adjacent residential neighbors are mitigated. In, addition, the ERC required the preparation of a noise report analyzing the potential )-1 Applications: M-2006-05, ASA-2006-19 (EA-2006-18) Valko Parking Garage Page 8 noise impacts of the additional parking stalls on the fourth level prior to the approval of the project. NEIBHORHOOD MEETING On September 14, 2006, a neighborhood meeting was hosted by Vallco Fashion Park to introduce their use permit application to park on the fourth level of the parking garage The meeting began at 6:30 PM at the Dynasty Restaurant. Five Vallco representatives were at the meeting, including Mike Rohde, Allan Wong, Dan Orloff (meeting facilitator), a note taker and a representative from the builder (Pankow Builders). Overall, it was a well organized meeting. There were still sentiments from the neighbors expressing distrust of Vallco's organization and their presentations. The meeting was attended by approximately 15 neighbors and Councilwoman Dolly Sandoval. Neighbors raised several issues and were responded to by Valko's representatives. The issues raised are summarized as follows: Parking Structure Height. The neighbors were concerned about the proposed structure height and wanted clarification on how the height is measured and asked if the structure could go below ground even more. Noise Impact. Concerns were raised about the additional noise impacts to the neighborhood from automobiles and people from the ramp going up to the fourth level and parking on the fourth floor. Neighbors wanted to see the noise analysis and discussions on mitigation measures (i.e., sound walls and baffling devices/landscaping) prior to the public hearing. Light Impacts. Concerns were raised on the light standards on the fourth level. Questions were raised on the intensity, timing and visual appearance of the light standards. These details should be disclosed prior to hearing. Alternative Parking Locations. Questions were raised if there are other locations in the mall to accommodate the parking needs (i.e., Penny's garage, Rosebowl site and the approved condo site). Vallco's Reciprocal Easement Agreements (REAs). Discussion focused on the Vallco's parking obligations to their major tenants (i.e., Macy's and AMC) and Vallco's negotiation efforts with them regarding parking. Visual Illustrations. Several neighbors pointed to the fact that the plans presented at the meeting were incomplete and confusing and that they should be revised to accurately reflect the proposal. Valko should consider 3-D models and mock up the fourth level parapet wall on the parking structure prior to the public hearing. Vallco's Viability. Several neighbors expressed interest of the future tenant make up of Vallco and expressed concerns of V allco' s ability to attract more reputable commercial tenants and their moving timing. )....13 Applications: M-2006-05, ASA-2006-19 (EA-2006-18) Vallco Parking Garage Page 9 Several neighbors commended that the meeting facilitator (Dan Orloff) did at better job at running and presenting the information than previous meetings held by Vallco. The meeting concluded around 8:30 PM. Since then, the Vallco has attempted to contact the neighbors that attended the neighborhood meeting and has offered to meet with individual neighbors to tour the garage construction site. Vallco's representative, Dan Orloff, has also walked the street of Norwich Drive (10396 through 10274) to meet with the neighbors one-on-one. Mr. Orloff was successful in making contact with four neighbors. A letter was left on the doorsteps of those who were not home inviting them to call with any questions and provided updates of the hearing schedule. PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission considered the item on its September 26,2006 hearing. The Commission did not discuss the project in detail and recommended that the project be considered by the City Council directly. Prepared by: Gary Chao, Associate Planner Approved by: ~ Steve Piasecki Director, Community Development {- David W. Knapp City Manager Enclosures: City Council Conditions of Approval Exhibit A: January 19, 2006 Council Action Letter. Exhibit B: Letter of Justification from the Application, August 31,2006 Exhibit C: Noise Analysis, Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. Exhibit D: Lighting details and Photometric Plan Plan set )-q M-2006-05; ASA2006-19 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROV AL OF A MODIFICATION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED USE PERMIT (U-2005-19) TO ALLOW THE PARKING STRUCTURE NORTH OF MACY'S TO EXCEED THE PERMITTED 32-FOOT HEIGHT LIMIT TO ACCESS P AKING ON THE FOURTH LEVEL. SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit Modification, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the City Council has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit Modification is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Applications No. M-2006-05 & ASA-2006-19 as set forth in the Minutes of the City Council Meeting of October 18, 2006, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. c2 -/0 Resolution No. Page 2 M-2006-05; ASA-2006-19 October 18, 2006 SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: M-2006-05; ASA-2006-19 Mike Rohde (Vallco Parking Garage) 10123 N. Wolfe Road SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based the Plan Set dated September 11, 2006 or as it may be amended by the conditions set forth in this resolution. 2. VISUAL IMPACTS The following revisions shall be made to the revised plans relating to mitigating the visual impacts of the proposed 4th level prior to final occupancy of the garage structure: . Delete 16 stalls from the 3rd level ramp (see Figure 1 of the Council staff report). . A minimum 6-foot noise attenuation wall shall be erected along gridline B (see Figure 2 of the Council staff report). . The cable railings along the 3rd level ramp shall be revised to a solid 4- foot parapet wall to help screen automobile activities and help buffer noise impacts (see Figure 3 of the Council staff report). . The applicant shall with staff to design additional barricades on the 3rd level ramp (after the 32-foot height limit) that will channel cars further away from the westerly edge of the garage (see Figure 4 of the Council staff report). . To help enhance the aesthetics of the garage, metal grids or trellises shall be proposed along the south, north and east elevation in between each of the garage bay openings. . The existing triple rows of mature trees shall be maintained and preserved. A minimum of 20 additional trees shall be planted along the existing sound wall at strategic locations and along the west side of the parking garage to further enhance the visual screening. 3. NOISE IMPACTS Noise mitigation requirements included in the Development Agreement shall be implemented as described in the Development Agreement. Sound baffle panels shall be constructed on the west and partial north and south elevations. The sound baffling panels shall completely infill each of the garage bay openings and any gaps or openings shall be sealed off. 4. LIGHTING IMPACTS ~-II Resolution No. Page 3 M-2006-05; ASA-2006-19 October 18, 2006 No light standards shall be located on the west perimeter of the fourth level; lighting shall be installed in the barriers or walls of the structure. Alllight sources shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible off-site. The height of the fourth level light standards shall be the minimum needed to provide adequate lighting. Light levels shall be reduced in the late evening. In addition, the following must be addressed: . The light poles along gridline B shall be deleted and replaced with inboard lights with cut-shield within the staff proposed 6-foot noise attenuation wall as mentioned previously in the staff report. . The applicant shall work with staff to reduce the height of the light poles along gridline C to no higher than 12 to 14 feet measured from the ground and may increase the number of light poles to provide adequate lighting coverage. . The applicant shall submit a lighting control plan indicating early shut- off schedules for the roof level lights. . The applicant shall provide a report from a professional lighting expert confirming that the intensity and number of lights on the 4th level are minimized and reduced to the maximum extent possible. 5. ARCHITECTURE Architectural and Site Review by the Director of Community Development shall be required for the following elements: ~ "Green Screen" design ~ Greater architectural detail and interest for garage and entrances ~ Light standards ~ Landscaping, including an evaluation of the ash trees adjacent to the west property line ~ Sound baffle panels ~ Fourth level barrier extensions ~ Crosswalks 6. GREEN SCREEN A" green screen" shall be located on the west and partial north and south elevations. A green landscaping fabric or similar fabrics as determined to be appropriate by the Director of Community Development shall be placed behind the metal mesh material. The fabric may be removed once the landscaping has grown to the top of the parking structure, as determined by the Director of Community Development. In addition, the green screen shall be extended to cover the extra 4-foot tall parapet wall along the west perimeter of the parking garage. 7. CROSSWALKS Crosswalks shall consist of the existing crosswalk on Perimeter Road on the east side of the proposed garage, the proposed crosswalk between the garage and the shopping center and an additional crosswalk at the four-way stop on the northeast side of the garage. Details of the new crosswalks shall be included in ;[-1 ~ Resolution No. Page 4 M-2006-05; ASA-2006-19 October 18, 2006 the Architectural and Site Approval by the Director of Community Development. 8. TREE PROTECTION As part of the demolition or building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall be prepared by a certified arborist for the trees to be retained. In addition, the following measures shall be added to the protection plan: ~ For trees to be retained, chain link fencing and other root protection shall be installed around the dripline of the tree prior to any project site work. ~ No parking or vehicle traffic shall be allowed under root zones, unless using buffers approved by the Project Arborist. ~ No trenching within the critical root zone area is allowed. If trenching is needed in the vicinity of trees to be retained, the City's consulting arborist shall be consulted before any trenching or root cutting beneath the dripline of the tree. ~ Wood chip mulch shall be evenly spread inside the tree projection fence to a four-inch depth. ~ Tree protection conditions shall be posted on the tree protection barriers. ~ Retained trees shall be watered to maintain them in good health. ~ A covenant on the property shall be recorded that identifies all the protected trees, prior to final occupancy. The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified arborist prior to issuance of building permits. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the trees to be retained and shall provide reviews before building permit stage, during construction and before final occupancy of the garage. A report ascertaining the good health of the trees mentioned above shall be provided prior to issuance of final occupancy. 9. TREE PROTECTION BOND All Evergreen Ash, Coast Redwood or any other significant trees as determined by the Director of Community Development that are not required to be removed to construct the project or were identified with health or structure problems, shall be covered by a tree protection bond. A tree protection bond in the amount of $50,000 shall be provided prior to issuance of demolition or building permits. 11. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building materials shall be recycled. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials were recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. ). -/3 Resolution No. Page 5 M-2006-05; ASA-2006-19 October 18,2006 12. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 13. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or sediment control plan shall be provided. ) -I tf-' City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino,CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3223 FAX: (408) 777-3366 crrYbF CUPEIQINO OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK January 19, 2006 Mike Rohde Vallco mternational Shopping.Center 10123 N. Wolfe Road, #2030 Cupertino, CA 95014 Re: Consider Application Nos. U-2005-19, ASA-2005-17, TR-2005-08 (EA-2005-15); Mike Rohde (Va11co Fashion Park parking garage), 10123 N. Wolfe Road, APN 316-20-064: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration b) Use Permit for a portion of a proposed three-level, four-story parking garage that exceeds the permitted 32-foot height limit (portions of the garage at approximately 41 feet and elevator tower at 49 feet) c) Architectural and site approval for a portion of a three-story, four level parking garage that exceeds the permitted height of32 feet d) Tree removal and replanting to construct a parking garage Dear Mr. Rohde: At its January 17, 2006, regular meeting, the Cupertino City Council approved the project with the following additional conditions: o The height of the structure is 32 feet measured from the effective grade of the adjacent family homes . The elevator is 49 feet on the southeast comer . The screening recommended by the planning commission will be included . Staff will review the architectural and landscaping plans rather than the planning commission . There is an intention that the wall will not be opened in the future . There is an intention to not approve any more height to the structure in the future. Printed on Recycled Paper ;2..-/5 U-2005-19 Page 2 January 19, 2006 The Use Permit conditions are as follows: SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on Sheets 00-14 ofthe Plan Set dated 01-03-06. 2. FOURTHPARKINGLEVEL Twenty parking spaces on the fourth parking level shall be removed, which eliminates the need for barriers and lighting. 3. ARCHITECTURE Architectural and Site Review by the Planning Commission shall be required for the following elements: ):0 "Green Screen" design ):0 Greater architectural detail and interest for garage and entrances ):0 Light standards ):0 Landscaping, including an evaluation of the ash trees adjacent to the west property line ):0 Sound baffle panels ):0 Fourth level barrier extensions ):0 Crosswalks 4. GREEN SCREEN A "green screen" shall be located on the west and partial north and south elevations. 5. NOISE CONTROL Noise mitigation requirements included in the Development Agreement shall be implemented as described in the Development Agreement. Sound baffle panels shall be constructed on the west and partial north and south elevations. 6. LIGHTING No light standards shall be located on the west perimeter of the fourth level; lighting shall be installed in the barriers. All light sources shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible off-site. The height of the fourth level light standards shall be the minimum needed to provide adequate lighting. Light levels shall be reduced in the late evening. 7 . CROSSWALKS Crosswalks shall consist of the existing crosswalk on Perimeter Road on the east side of the proposed garage, the proposed crosswalk between the garage and the shopping center and an additional crosswalk at the four-way stop on the northeast side of the garage. Details of the new crosswalks, shall be included in the Architectural and Site Approval by the Planning Commission. ~-/~ U-2005-19 Page 3 January 19, 2006 8. TREE PROTECTION As part of the demolition or building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall be prepared by a certified arborist for the trees to be retained. In addition, the following measures shall be added to the protection plan: ~ For trees to be retained, chain link fencing and other root protection shall be installed around the drip line of the tree prior to any project site work. };> No parking or vehicle traffic shall be allowed under root zones, unless using buffers approved by the Project Arborist. ~ No trenching within the critical root zone area is allowed. If trenching is needed in the vicinity of trees to be retained, the City's consulting arborist shall be consulted before any trenching or root cutting beneath the drip line of the tree. ~ Wood chip mulch shall be evenly spread inside the tree projection fence to a four- inch depth. ~ Tree protection conditions shall be posted on the tree protection barriers. ~ Retained trees shall be watered to maintain them in good health. ~ A covenant on the property shall be recorded that identifies all the protected trees, prior to final occupancy. The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified arborist prior to issuance of building permits. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the trees to be retained and shall provide reviews before building permit stage, during construction and before final occupancy of the garage. A report ascertaining the good health of the trees mentioned above shall be provided prior to issuance of final occupancy. 9. TREE PROTECTION BOND All Evergreen Ash, Coast Redwood or any other significant trees as determined by the Director of Community Development that are not required to be removed to construct the project or were identified with health or structure problems, shall be covered by a tree protection bond. A tree protection bond in the amount of $50,000 shall be provided prior to issuance of demolition or building permits. 10. PARKING Compliance with the number of required parking spaces during construction shall be demonstrated prior to issuance of building permits for the garage. 11. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building materials shall be recycled. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials were recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 12. NOTICE OF FEES. DEDICATIONS. RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to ~ -I ~7 U-2005-19 Page 4 January 19, 2006 Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are, hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 13. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or sediment control plan shall be provided. The Architectural and Site Approval conditions are as follows: SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on Sheets 00-14 ofthe Plan Set dated 01-03-06. 2. FOURTH PARKING LEVEL Twenty parking spaces on the fourth parking level shall be removed, which eliminates the need for barriers and lighting. 3. ARCHITECTURE Architectural and Site Review by the Planning shall be required for the following elements: );> "Green Screen" design ~ Greater architectural detail and interest for garage and entrances ~ Light standards ~ Landscaping, including an evaluation ofthe ash trees adjacent to the west property line ~ Sound baffle panels ~ Fourth level barrier extensions ~ Crosswalks 4. GREEN SCREEN A "green screen" shall be located on the west and partial north and south elevations. J. -/ B U-2005-19 Page 5 January 19, 2006 5. NOISE CONTROL Noise mitigation ,requirements included in the Development Agreement shall be implemented as described in the Development Agreement. Sound baffle panels shall be constructed on the west and partial north and south elevations. 6. LIGHTING No light standards shall be located on the west perimeter of the fourth level; lighting shall be installed in the barriers. All light sources shall be shielded so that the light source is not visible off-site. The height of the fourth level light standards shall be the minimum needed to provide adequate lighting. Light levels shall be reduced in the late evening. 7. CROSSWALKS Crosswalks shall consist of the existing crosswalk on Perimeter Road on the east side of the proposed garage, the proposed crosswalk between the garage and the shopping center and an additional crosswalk at the four-way stop on the northeast side of the garage. Details of the new crosswalks shall be included in the Architectural and Site Approval by the Planning Commission. 8. TREE PROTECTION As part of the demolition or building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall be prepared by a certified arborist for the trees to be retained. In addition, the following measures shall be added to the protection plan: ~ F or trees to be retained, chain link fencing and other root protection shall be installed around the drip line ofthe tree prior to any project site work. ~ No parking or vehicle traffic shall be allowed under root zones, unless using buffers approved by the Project Arborist. ~ No trenching within the critical root zone area is allowed. If trenching is needed in the vicinity of trees to be retained, the City's consulting arborist shall be consulted before any trenching or root cutting beneath the drip line of the tree. ~ Wood chip mulch shall be evenly spread inside the tree projection fence to a four- inch depth. ~ Tree protection conditions shall be posted on the tree protection barriers. ~ Retained trees shall be watered to maintain them in good health. ~ A covenant on the property shall be recorded that identifies all the protected trees, prior to final occupancy. The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified arborist prior to issuance of building permits. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the trees to be retained and shall provide reviews before building permit stage, during construction and before final occupancy of the garage. A report ascertaining the good health of the trees mentioned above shall be provided prior to issuance of final occupancy. 02-IQ U-2005-19 Page 6 January 19, 2006 9. TREE PROTECTION BOND All Evergreen Ash, Coast Redwood or any other significant trees as determined by the Director of Community Development that are not required to be removed to construct the project or were identified with health or structure problems, shall be covered by a tree protection bond. A tree protection bond in the amount of $50,000 shall be provided prior to issuance of demolition or building permits. 10. PARKING Compliance with the number of required parking spaces during construction shall be demonstrated prior to issuance of building permits for the garage. 11. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building materials shall be recycled. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials were recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 12. NOTICE OF FEES. DEDICATIONS. RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 13. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or sediment control plan shall be provided. The Tree Removal conditions are as follows: SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVAL ACTION Approval is based on Sheets 00-14 ofthe Plan Set dated 01-03-06. ;(-;;'0 U-2005-19 Page 7 January 19, 2006 2. TREE EV ALVA TION The health and effectiveness ofthe ash trees along the west property line shall be evaluated as part of the Planning Commission's architectural and site approval review of the landscaping plan. 3. TREE PROTECTION As part ofthe demolition or building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall be prepared by a certified arborist for the trees to be retained. In addition, the following measures shall be added to the protection plan: ~ For trees to be retained, chain link fencing and other root protection shall be installed around the dripline ofthe tree prior to any project site work. ~ No parking or vehicle traffic shall be allowed under root zones, unless using buffers approved by the Project Arborist. ~ No trenching within the critical root zone area is allowed. If trenching is needed in the vicinity of trees to be retained, the City's consulting arborist shall be consulted before any trenching or root cutting beneath the drip line of the tree. ~ Wood chip mulch shall be evenly spread inside the tree projection fence to a four- inch depth. ~ Tree protection conditions shall be posted on the tree protection barriers. ~ Retained trees shall be watered to maintain them in good health. ~ A covenant on the property shall be recorded that identifies all the protected trees, prior to final occupancy. The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified arborist prior to issuance of building permits. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the trees to be retained and shall provide reviews before building permit stage, during construction and before final occupancy of the garage. A report ascertaining the good health of the trees mentioned above shall be provided prior to issuance of final occupancy. 4. TREE PROTECTION BOND All Evergreen Ash, Coast Redwood or any other significant trees as determined by the Director of Community Development that are not required to be removed to construct the project or were identified with health or structure problems, shall be covered by a tree protection bond. A tree protection bond in the amount of $50,000 shall be provided prior to issuance of demolition or building permits. 5. NOTICE OF FEES. DEDICATIONS. RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020( d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all ~"-.QI U-2005-19 Page 8 January 19, 2006 of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. Please review conditions carefully. If you have any questions regarding the conditions of approval, please contact the Department of Community Development at 408-777-3308 for clarification. Failure to incorporate conditions into your plan set will result in delays at the plan checking stage. If development conditions require tree preservations, do not clear the site until required tree protection devices are installed. The conditions of project approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), these conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. Any interested person, including the applicant, prior to seeking judicial review of the city council's decision in this matter, must first file a petition for reconsideration with the city clerk within ten days after the council's decision. Any petition so filed must comply with municipal ordinance code 92.08.096. Sincerely: ~ Grace Schmidt Deputy City Clerk cc: Community Development J.-~~ . LANDMARK PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT 11II RECRTVED -, -a. .',. 2'u-1 'u-.-', 'c-)' ~-;E P I - " BY: August 31,2006 Gary Chao Associate Planner City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Dear Gary: In reference to your email dated Thursday, August 24,2006, we are submitting an application for the Use Permit Modification for the North Parking Garage. Our focus for this application is the desire to proceed with the fourth level ofthe North garage. As you indicate, we will provide you with a sight line analysis from the adjacent properties to the 4th level of the garage. Under a separate cover we will also send to you photos from the 4th level of the garage to the neighbors to the west and an updated master parking analysis for the Vallco Campus. A couple of options for the 4th level would be to one, extend our proposed green screen that shields the garage from the neighbors to a 36 foot level as opposed to a 32 foot level. Along with this first option we would propose eliminating the first west side row of parking stalls near the ramp at the 32 feet level. Referring to the enclosed drawings the parking stalls that would be eliminated would be from gridline 13 through 19 on gridline A. Primarily, this parking garage location best provides for cars coming from 1-280; by having a significant number of stalls in this location, traffic at Wolfe & Vallco will be reduced as cars enter onto campus before that intersection. This garage at it's full capacity (709 stalls proposed) will better balance the location and number of stalls across campus. Also, as you mayor may not know, the main objective of the Use Permit Modification will be for Vallco Fashion Park to maintain our REA/Department Store approved parking counts for the Vall co campus. As you can imagine, parking in this structure will be essential to the future success ofthe mall. Additionally, we continue to support the guidelines of the Development Agreement with regards to closing Perimeter Road between the hours of9p,m. and 6a.m. and restricting access to the 4th level ofthe parking structure after 9p.m. Furthermore, we will be holding a neighborhood meeting prior to Sept. 15, 2006 and our public facilitator will be Dan Orloff of Orloff & Williams. We will be contacting you about the availability of a meeting space at the City Hall Building. Please feel free to contact me with additional information or concerns. Valleo Fashion Park 10123 North Wolfe Road Suite 2030 Cupertino, California 95014 408,777.3081 Fax 408.7250370 ;)-,23 www.vallcornall.com Sincerely, A ~ r?kJo Mike Rohde General Manager MR/scd Enclosures cc: City File ;2 - ;)4- ILUNGWORTH&RoDKIN.INC. /",. A co U s ti c s · Air Qua Ii t y "111 505 Petaluma Boulevard South Petaluma, California 94952 Tel: 707-766-7700 www.illingworthrodkin.com Fax: 707-766-7790 illro@illingworthrodkin.com October 11, 2006 Gary Chao City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 VIA E-Mail: GarvC(7l>cupertino.org SUBJECT: Vallco Fashion Park - North Parking Garage, Cupertino, CA Environmental Noise Assessment Dear Gary: This report presents the results of our environmental noise assessment of the North Parking Garage project proposed at the Vallco Fashion Park in Cupertino, California. The project would increase the parking capacity ofthe permitted 3-story parking garage that is currently under construction by adding a fourth level of parking. The additional level of parking would be at the south end of the parking garage away from adjacent residential receivers to the north. The noise analysis includes a description of the ambient noise environment at residential receivers adjoining the project. site and summarizes noise measurements made at a similar parking garage in Peta1uma, California. Noise levels with the operation of the parking garage were calculated and assessed with respect to the City of Cupertino's Noise Performance Standards presented in the City's Municipal Code. Existing Noise Environment The project site is located at the Va1lco Fashion Park in Cupertino, California, east ofMacy's and north ofT.G.!. Friday's restaurant. A three-level parking garage is currently under construction on the site, which was formerly a parking lot for the Valko Fashion Park. Single-family residential land uses border the project site to the north. The private outdoor use areas of these residential land uses are separated from the project site by ten-foot high noise barriers. The majority of the adjacent residences are single-story. There is a condominium and townhouse development proposed to the east. Ambient noise measurements were made at the property line of the residential receivers north of the project site from Friday, September 22,2006 to Tuesday, September 26,2006. Noise levels d..-~5 were measured at one location as shown on Figure 1. Noise data gathered at this site are summarized in Figures 2 to 6. Photograph 1 shows the view of the parking garage under construction from noise measurement location L T -1. Noise measurement location LT-l was made at the north property line of the project site to represent the noise environment of the residential uses nearest the parking garage. The sound level meter was located approximately 80 feet from the northernmost edge of the parking garage. Construction activities at the parking garage affected the data gathered during the noise monitoring survey between the hours of7:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on weekdays and Saturday. These data were not representative and were not used in the impact analysis. Construction did not occur during weekday and Saturday evenings or on Sunday. Noise data collected during these times were representative of existing ambient noise conditions. The predominant ambient noise source at this location was local and distant vehicular traffic. Hourly average noise levels typically ranged from 52 dBA to 62 dBA Leg during the day, and 48 dBA to 55 dBA Leg at night. Maximum noise levels measured at this location were routinely 60 to 70 dBA Lmax with excursions ranging from 75 to 85 dBA Lmax. The Community Noise Equivalent Level at location LT-l was 60 dBA CNEL on Sunday, September 24,2006. A series of noise measurements were made approximately 75 feet from the downtown Petaluma parking garage to quantify noise levels from regularly occurring noise sources within a parking garage. The downtown Petaluma parking garage is a four-story parking garage over ground- floor commercial uses and is of similar design as the proposed North Parking Garage (see Photograph 2). Noise measurements were made of typical noise-generating activities occurring on parking levels 2-5. At each parking level, a car door was opened and closed several times, the engine was started, and the auto's horn was sounded. This series of noise-generating events was repeated at each parking level at the nearest parking stall to the edge of the garage and at a distance of 50 feet from the edge of the parking garage. Noise measurements were also made as the auto traveled up and down the parking garage. The events generating the highest noise levels were the sounding of an auto's horn. Maximum noise levels were also higher on intermediate levels (i.e., levels 2,3, and 4) with parking above because of the reverberation of sound within the garage and reflection of noise that would otherwise travel upward and away from a ground level receiver. Maximum noise levels generated by activities occurring on the 5th level were lowest because of the lack of a reflecting surface above. A summary of these data is presented in Table 1. TABLE 1 Representative Parking Garage Noise Levels Parking Lmax Noise Level Resulting from Parking Garage Events Garage Petaluma, California Level Vehicle Passby Door Slam Auto Horn Engine Start 1 st N/A N/A N/A N/A 2nd 54 dBA 53-57 dBA 63- 70 dBA 54-56 dBA 3rd 53 dBA 55-57 dBA 62-65 dBA 57-58 dBA 4th 53 dBA 54-58 dBA 62-66 dBA 53-55 dBA 5th < 52 dBA < 52 dBA 54-55 dBA < 52 dBA 2 rJ. -:J.1c Figure 1 Noise Measurement Location LT-l - .I.....I-r B /;:"'GRAS /D . --/"l , , _................ . ~ -. -.........- .-.. HARDSC.A.PE PAVING TREES IN PLPNTER , BOXES (TYP,) I i'll =- "--~'-~t/ .. ..,. :: '-'<:"-' / -) ....... .\, // ....._-,- ~ :'/ /<-.::i.......... / ~/ -- '~-'''- --}::~;:::::. ?~~ '. / '''''\'' '.....j i// "~i1/':::J ii il~' .', '.... I // // ,", // ;' ,: ". ',.... .) I! I! ~ '~~ ,,' i,: 'v ..' y;~ : :....~e. . UNDIS \=~~ JIlIN",,",_ .....................,..... ", + VALLCO FASHION PARK NORTH PARKING STRUCTURE CU~I!:I'!TINO, CJo.LII"OI'!NIA ,..~...-......,..._-,>,.........._.-.._...... ~_..-.....~ ~w::.i~~...~~~~~~~..:.:.:..-:..~~"'::.: Perko~!~tR~t,h. , r:lllll<)rs:. 1.;Ji.;l;{-;') \t-"<J I".,.. :.. "':11;, ,1111"....". W. .':.);..,;;..,...........1." :', "\1111'. ,";.01 h"'l><1 ,'I r l'll ;. I 1(.,;.' 1"1'" ~t ;,,:....l<t.\o<il.,t."'..4:~IU~.:,Io'J;,;).; ~ \ ~ .....:J Location L T-1 TREE TABLE: _. ...... : ~f'::!'l\' 1';'~ .,~.;.~ '>4 ,;",--,--"",-,'~", . . . EXISITNG R:::DWOOD EXISIING ASH f>RO?OS::::> TR:::E PRc.?O'SEO GR::::::N SCREEN VINES Landscape Plan SI-IEET 02 .:::''''~ p_l ~.~ ...~~ Noise Levels ~l t L T-1 M80 feet from the Vallco Parldng Structure ~lt Residential Property Line Frid~lY. September 22, 2006 100 95 90 85 80 ~ ~ 75 -- ....- 'i ~ 70 ~ ~ "" 65 - C> Z 60 55 50 45 40 000 2:00 4:00 Data Affected by Construction Noise 6:00 800 10:00 1200 14,00 1600 1800 20:00 2200 IWNGWORTH&RoDKtN,1Nc. illll Acoustics. Air Quality IIII:' Honr Bt>gllmillg ~ ~ ~ 4 u--.....Lmax -<>-- L(1) .:.......e- L(1 0) -&- L(5O) L(9D) __ Leq(hr) Figtll't> 2 100 95 90 85 2 80 i ~ 75 -; '-' ~ ;... 70 <l.- ..:l <l.- ~ 65 ... ~ Z 60 55 50 ~, 45 40 0:00 200 4:00 Noise Levels ~d LT-l ~..,80 feet from the V~l11co Parking Structure ~lt Residentbll Property Line S~lturd~lY, September 23, 2006 t .. ~ ~ _...N...............,................................................,..,.................."."........................,...................,...~.........._---_~ ~ '1 ~ ~f~~-;i~t4F-t,0~~tF;f'r :; \. "", <> Q. " tJ> " '<'.::;' ~"', tp I I, t : : .........{.l;~.....J..:w:~........".:~,....~.~.:".......m.....l\':.."..~.~;~....t ;.1.~:~t.;;r't-..+.;.... :', ;', ~<;';16"O ,.f~;.;<>. \iii'\l l:~~" ': . 1, I' ~ ... '>\ ~ ',,(. ~l .6. - J ,I, f I. ..m..J..:~1:~F.m'm":l..:.:?)<:ji~,1\f\:\~..i::&;~,~~i7:~'.;;,..;/:~;:~..14~ l 'T . . . I ~. ,:,'''.' '\ ~ " tf....,~;tt.....m....:;t......'...m:..m:"'......i;r.'m.......~'j~i:;,'1; h~,;t:Y.,:.,m" """" ",.... , "!Tci!j;H~i~ " il ~ , I III 'I II Data Affected by Construction Noise 6:00 8.00 1000 1200 14.00 1600 1800 20:00 2200 IWNGWORTH&RoDKJN,1Nc. illll Acoustics. Air Quality "": HOlD' Beg:iImillg ~ ~ ,...S::) 5 - u -A"" Lmax ---0- L(1) ---4il-- L(10) --B-- L(50) L(90) --..- Leq(hr) ['J;j,. CNEL = 64 IffiA Figure 3 100 95 90 85 ;;t;' 80 ~ 75 -- '- 1: ~ 70 ~ ~ '" 65 .... c:> Z 60 55 SO[ k 45 40 000 Noise Levels ~lt LT-l ,0'0,80 feet from the V~lllco Pnrldng Structure ~lt Residentinl Property Line Sund~lY~ September 24, 2006 .. I .. , . " ~ . ' , ' . : . , 1\ , , .. , .. 2:00 400 6:00 800 10:00 1200 1400 16,00 1800 20:00 2200 IwNGWORTH&RoDKIN,1Nc. illll Acoustics. Air Quality 1111/ Hom' Begimuug ~ ~ 6 .---A....LmaK ~L(1) --&- L(10) ----8-- L(50) L(90) ____ Leq(hr) CNEL = 60 (IBA Figtu'e 4 Noise Levels ~.lt LT-l ,..,80 feet from the Vlolllco Parldng Structure lolt Residenthl1 Property Line lVIonday, September 25, 2006 100 95 90 85 so :? ~ 75 "'= '-' .. ~ .... 70 <:Ii ~ :; . t <:Ii 65 ., .--+t-.:r- 1:1:> .... : 1I.It. :~ I~ ' :- = Z .., ",' 60 ' l ~ ~I I " . " 55 50 ...........,..........,.............................................."...............................................................,............,........ ..............,_........~,.....................~...'''..''...,......,...............,..................................,...................."...... , .": ;~J~~~~~i~~l}"~ , / "J dr,,, ~<>.f . 7': .....,1.\ ;~t:!~;~~;~~~~~tj~jj . 45 Data Affected by Construction Noise .........-................................................................................................,.....,..............,............................' 40 0.00 2:00 400 6:00 8:00 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 22:00 IwNGwORTH&RoDK1N,1Nc. illll Acoustics. Air Quality "If! Hom' BegiIUling 5l.> ~ - 7 --.. ......... Lmax -<>-- L(l) -(}-- L(10) --8-- L(50) L(90) -...- Leq(hr) CNEL = 65 (mA Figm'e 5 Noise Levels ,It LT-l ,..,80 feet from the Valleo P,ll'ldng Structure ,It Residentbll Property Line Tuesday. September 26. 2006 100 95 90 85 80 - ...r, ~ 75 -= '-' ~ ;; 70 ~ ~ ~ '" 65 ... ~~ Z 60 55 50 45 40 0:00 ...................,.,....,.........,...........,....'"",......,.......,........,..,,,.....,...........,,.......,,,.........,......,.,...................._------ ,~,..,..~.._,......,..,......,..............,...........................,........................."...' ,.........,......... ,.................... '~ hI ..~4!~"... ~..:;,.,....,;;;.."......,.. ......'........., ...........................'..'.................;t..::'f):.';............'....' , "::1: ;I~ -:-..... .r"",:;r~""" I: I'" ;, /.. /"'f' " '4l .:-....'" I '}~~i~~~~~~~:~,~Ji /' ... /' 'Y()')'l' ,,>C;.... ,/~... ......./ ";"d.' ~ .,~~~t~~!:i!~t:::i~,- ".<", (J .. .. '.... I :: To .. ::. I , " ~ + '.. ~ .."'..............._............;... ........... ...;;.;........,....................:.~...~:.. .......................................... ,. ......... . Data Affected by Construction Noise 2:00 4:00 6:00 8:00 1000 1200 14:00 1600 1800 20:00 22:00 IWNGWORTH&RoDKIN,1Nc. /1111 Acoustics · Air Quality IIIIl Hom' BegiIuaillg ~ I <.kl ~ 8 ...............Lmax --o--L(1) ----G-- L(10) -B-- L(SO) L(90) ____ Leq(hr) Figm'e 6 View of North Parking Garage from LT-l 9 Photograph 1 >\.> ~ l>J View of Petaluma Parking Garage from ST-1 Photograph 2 10 ~ ~ 4=- Regulatory Criteria-City of Cupertino Municipal Code The City of Cupertino regulates noise within the community in Chapter 10.48 (Community Noise Control) of the Municipal Code. Quantitative noise level limits are presented in Table 2. Nonresidential land uses can generate noise levels up to 65 dBA during the daytime and 55 dBA during the nighttime at the complaint site of a receiving property. The "residential" standard allows noise levels up to 60 dBA during the daytime and 50 dBA during the nighttime. The more conservative residential standard was used in the impact analysis. Although not explicitly stated, these limits are assumed to be in terms of the average noise level (Leg). Section 10.48.050 allows for brief exceedances of the daytime noise limit providing, that the sum of the noise duration in minutes plus the excess noise level does not exceed twenty in a two-hour period. For example, a noise level of79 dBA could be experienced at a residential property for no more than 1 minute in any 2-hour period during the day. 80 dBA would be the maximum instantaneous noise level limit during daytime hours. Theoretically, the noise level limits presented in Section 10.48.050 are more restrictive than the noise level limits in Section 10.48.040 alone. For instance, a maximum noise level greater than 80 dBA could be generated by an activity over a short period of time; however, the average noise level could continue to be less than 60 dBA Leg during the two-hour averaging period. The Municipal Code does not specify statistical noise limits for noises occurring during nighttime hours. A reasonable interpretation of these regulations would similarly restrict nighttime events provided that the sum of the noise duration in minutes plus the excess noise level does not exceed twenty in a two-hour period. For example, a maximum instantaneous noise level of70 dBA would not be allowed between 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and 6:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekends. 10.48.040 Daytime and Nighttime Maximum Noise Levels. Section 10.48.040 states that, individual noise sources, or the combination of a group of noise sources located on the same property, shall not produce a noise level exceeding those specified on property zoned as follows, unless specifically provided in another section of this chapter: TABLE 2 Daytime and Nighttime Maximum Noise Levels, (Leg) Land Use at Point of Origin Maximum Noise Level at Complaint Site of Receiving Property Nighttime Daytime 8:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. (weekdays) (weekdays) 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. (weekends) (weekends) Residential 50 dBA 60 dBA Nonresidential 55 dBA 65 dBA (Ord. 1921, (part), 2003; Ord. 1871, (part), 2001) J -35~ 10.48.050 Brief Daytime Incidents. A. During the daytime period only, brief noise incidents exceeding limits in other sections of this chapter are allowed; providing, that the sum of the noise duration in minutes plus the excess noise level does not exceed twenty in a two-hour period. For example, the following combinations would be allowable: TABLE 3 Excursions Allowed Above Daytime Standard Noise Increment Above Normal Standard Noise Duration in 2-Hour Period 5dBA 15 minutes 10 dBA 10 minutes 15 dBA 5 minutes 19 dBA 1 minute Analysis The project would add a fourth level of parking to the permitted 3-story parking garage that is currently under construction. The additional level of parking would be at the south end of the parking garage away from the adjacent residential receivers to the north. To assess the noise impacts resulting from the project, it is important to first assess noise levels generated by the permitted 3-story parking garage. Since the parking structure would be operational during daytime and nighttime hours, the applicable daytime Lmax noise level limit would be 80 dBA, and the applicable nighttime Lmax noise level would be 70 dBA. The Lmax noise level limits would be the most restrictive limits for noises occurring within the parking garage. The permitted parking garage would be fitted with "noise baffles" between the concrete columns which would effectively form a solid barrier to noises generated within levels 1 through 3 of the parking garagel. The exact specifications of these barriers were unavailable at the time of this report's preparation, so a credible worst-case scenario assuming no "noise baffles" was used in the assessment. Data measured at the Petaluma parking garage (ST-l) were used to quantify typical maximum noise levels generated by activities within a representative parking garage assuming no additional attenuation provided by the "noise baffles". As shown in Table 1, maximum noise levels from the sounding of an auto's horn are calculated to be 66 to 70 dBA Lmax at a distance of 80 feet from the edge of the parking garage. These relatively infrequent events would occur if an auto horn is sounded to warn other motorists or because of a vehicle's alarm system. More frequent noise sources such as door slams, engine starts, vehicle passbys, and the sounds of human voices would range from about 53 to 58 dBA Lmax. Maximum noise levels would be lower in the rear yards that are shielded by an existing 10- foot noise barrier. The operation of the permitted parking garage would generate maximum noise levels that would be in compliance with the limits presented in the Municipal Code at existing residential receivers to 1 Telephone conversation with City Staff, October 3, 2006. 12 )-30 the north and proposed residential receivers to the east. At night, the permitted garage could at times yield maximum noise levels that would equal the 70 dBA Lmax limit at proposed residential receivers to the east. Maximum noise levels would be less than 70 dBA Lmax in the rear yards of residential land uses that are shielded by the 10-foot noise barrier. Measured noise data at location L T -1 indicates that at times current nighttime Lmax noise levels exceed 70 dBA Lmax, The proposed proj ect would add approximately 148 spaces of additional parking on the 4th floor of the garage. It is assumed that the ramp to the 4th level would be shielded from view by a four- foot parapet wall and there would be no parking along the ramp leading to the 4th level of the garage as recommended by City Staff. The 4th level would also be shielded from residential receivers to the north by the existing ten-foot high noise barrier that separates single-family residential uses from Vallco Fashion Park and a 4 to 6-foot barrier along the westernmost edge of the 4th level of parking (gridline B on 4th floor plan sheet). The relative difference in the acoustical performance of a 4-foot or 6-foot barrier would be negligible in this geometry. There would be no direct line of sight from the rear yards of the nearest residential units to noise- generating activities occurring at the 4th level because of the existing lO-foot noise barrier at the residential property line and proposed barriers. The existing 10-foot noise barrier alone is calculated to provided an additional 5 dBA of noise attenuation in the rear yard of adjacent residential uses from noise levels generated at the 4th level of the proposed parking garage. Assuming a source noise level of 100 dBA Lmax at a distance of 3-feet from the front of an auto during the sounding of it's horn (e.g., warning, or vehicles alarm system), maximum noise levels are calculated to be 60 dBA Lmax in the rear yards of the nearest residential uses. Door slams and engine starts would generate noise levels of about 80 dBA Lmax at a distance of 3- feet from and auto. Maximum noise levels from these events would be approximately 40 dBA Lmax in the rear yards of the nearest residential uses. The operation of the 4t level of parking would generate maximum noise levels that would be in compliance with the daytime and nighttime limits presented in the Municipal Code at existing residential receivers to the north and proposed residential receivers to the east. The intermittent maximum noise levels generated by the 4th level of parking would be at or below ambient maximum noise levels currently experienced in adjacent residential rear yards. Conclusions The proposed project would not generate noise levels exceeding the limits presented in the Municipal Code or substantially increase noise levels resulting from the operation of the permitted parking garage. The additional level of parking would be shielded from residential receivers to the north by the existing and proposed noise barriers, and noise levels generated by activities occurring on the 4th level of the parking garage would be below the level of noise emanating from the intermediate levels of the permitted 3-story structure. Maximum noise levels generated by typical noise sources at the 4th level of the parking garage would be at or below ambient maximum noise levels that result from vehicular traffic along the perimeter road. Additional mitigation would not be required above and beyond the recommendations of City Staff and the requirements presented in the development agreement for the permitted garage. . . . 13 :2 ,3'7 This concludes the environmental noise assessment for the North Parking Garage project. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely yours, .-,/' /' ,/ Michael S. Thill Senior Consultant ILLINGWORTH & RODKIN, INC. (06-193) 14 J---3t5 ,.(Y;..:t\ I'7f'c~,%' ,-;;:-.,.,.,~ ~.. . ......1 j' I -='1' rL ~-I"f\\r;&'- Ji L:U 1/ Ii I' - ,-,'~ ,i~/ /\.1.' / :'J,j ~,; {5~ ;',.? ';;',> {\ /;:0=' \f.,"" J IJ , /., .,~. .c 'v ,.6.,,, .__1. f.i:,....,.. ;; L . /., \, ....-" -=-=- FEATURIES 11 SPECt:Fr:CAHOr\lS INTENDED USE - Ideal for parking areas, street lighting. walkways and car lots. CONSTRUCTION - Rugged, die.cast, soft corner aluminum housing with 0,12' nominal wall thickness, Extruded 4" soft corner arm for pole or wall mounting is standard, Die-cast door frame has impact. resistant, tempered, glass lens that is fully gasketed with one-piece tubular silicone, FINISH - Standard finish is dark bronze (DDB) polyester powder finish, with other architectural colors available, OPTICAL SYSTEM - Anodized, aluminum hydroformed reflectors: IES full cutoff distributions R2 (asymmetric), R3 (asymmetric). R4 (forward throw) and R5S (square), High.performance anodized, segmented aluminum reflectors IES full cutoff distributions SR2 (asymmetric), SR3 (asymmetric) and SR45C (forward throw, sl1arp cutoff). Segmented reflectors attach with tool-less fasteners <lnd are rot<ltable and interchangable. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM - High reactance, high power factor ballast for 100WJ150W, Conslant.wattage autotransformer for 175.400W, Super CWA Pulse Start ballast required for 200\^!. 320W and 350W (must order SCWA option). Ballast is copper-wound and 100% factory-tested, Porcelain. horizomal, position. oriented. socket with copper alloy, nickel-plated screw shell and cemer contact. Medium-base socket used with 100W & 150W. mogul.base socket llsed with 175.400W, UL listed 1500W-600V, LISTING - UL Listed (standard), CSA Certified (see Options), UL lister! for wet locations. IPes rated in accordance with standard IEC 529, .. -_.======...=,"".,.."."""..,=...,,,=~-== C'Jl31og I""mb"r VJ.l.D 400hll R4 277 SPD09 LPI HS DDS WLP Notes MACY'S SITE. CUPERTINO, CA. Type 82 Soft Square Cutoff Lighting ~~' . . . . , KAD METAL HALIDE 100W., 150W, 175W, 200W, 250W, 320W, 350W, 400W 20' to 35' Mounting r;~/<;;;:.?';;~~-::-" r, ~ eL\.J,_~~~~ ,,~. " l)'<''''~J)J> Standard Dimensions' EPA: l,2ft,2 Weight: 41 Ibs (18.6 kg) Length; 1].'112" ('14.5 cm) Widtll: 17.1/2" (44,5 cm) Depth; ].1/8" (18,1 em) i~ ].1/8" (18,1 cm) --.1. , ;........_-_._-------_._~..__._-._.~---; 1- 4" I (10.2 cm) 17.1/r (44.5 crn) ORDERING INFORMATION Example: KAD 400M R2120 SPD04 LPI Choose the boldface Catalog nomenclature that best suits your needs and write it on the "appropriate Hne. Order accessories as separate catalog number. KAD 400M I L_~ries ..J KAD 100M KAO 150M KAO 175M KAO 200M KAO 250M KAD 320M' KAO 350M' KAO 400M1 277 I SPD09 I I Mounting Square pole (4" arm) (standard) Square pole (9" arm)' Round pole (4" arm) R4 I Voltage I I SPD04 120 2083 2403 .11.L 347 4803 TB' SP009 RP004 Round pole (9" arm)5 Wood pole or wall (4" arm) Wood pole or wall (9' armf" Wall bracket (4" arm)" Wall bracket (9" arm)" (When ordering KMA, DAD12) Shipped Separately KMA Mast arm adapter KTMB Twin mounting bar DAD12P Degree Arm (pole) DAD12WB Degree Arm (wall) RP009 WWD04 WWD09 WBD04 WBD09 L1Arm Distribution Hydroformed Reflectors R2 lES lype 11 asymmetric2 R3 IES type III asynunetric2 R4 IES type IV forward throw2 R5 IES type V square Segmented Reflectors SR2 IES tyrlc II asymrnelric2 SR3 IES type III asymmelric! SR4SC rES type IV forward throw "IOTES: 1 Reducfld jacket ED28 lamp must be us"d with SR2. SR3 & SR'ISC optics, 1 House-o;ide shield aV;:iilable. 3 Consul factory fcJ( bvarlnbility in Canada. 4 Optional mult1-lap ballast (120, 208, 240. 277V). 5 The SP009. RP009 or WWD09 mU:.l be used vJhen two or more luminaires iire o(i<mted on a 90~ drilling pattern. 5 MIiY be ordered ;:~s ar.::essory, 7 QRSTD av.ailable in ~elect wHtlugcs; cono::ult factory. 8 Additional arcl1it(~ctur<11 colors availablE!: please s~:e Architectur01f Colors brochure, form no. 794.3. 9 Must use R PD09, 10 Only available wilh SR2, SR3, ond, SR4SC optics, Outdoor LPI HS DDS WLP I Tenon 0.0. 0 ne 2.318" T20-190 2.718" T25-190 4' 1'35-190 Options Shipped Installed In Fixture SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V, nia TB) D F Double fuse (208, 240, 4BOV. nla TB) Vandal guard Wire guard Decorative wall bracket Architectural Colors& Standard Colors DO B Dark bronze standard) DWH White DBL Black Classic Colors DMB Medium bronze DNA Natural aluminum DSS Sandstone DGC Charcoal gray DTG Tennis green DBR Bright red DSB Steel blue KADVG KADWG KADWBA PER NEMA twist-lock receplacle only (no pholocontrol) Lamo includedas standard Less lamp Power TrayiO Terminal Wiring Blockln Quartz restrike system (250W maximum, lamp not included); CSA Certified Super CINA Pulse Start Ballast (ilia 100Vl' & mW) Shipped Separately6 NEMA twist-lock PE (120, 208, 240V) NEMA twist-lock PE (347V) NEMA twisl.lock PE (4BOV) NEMA twist-lock PE (277V) House.side shield (R2, R3, 1~4) fSR2 SR3\ WLP With Lamp LPI L/LP PO WTB QRS CSA SCWA PE1 PE3 PE4 PE7 HS Accessories: Tenon Mounting Slipfitter Order as separate catalog number. Number or fixtures Two@90< TI1fee@120< T20.2909 T20.3209 T25.2909 T25-320 1'35.2909 1'35,320 F oUf,:s;90~ T20-4909 125.4909 135.4909 Two@lS0a 120- 280 T2S-280 135-280 Tlm"e@gO. T20-390~ T25.3909 1'35.3909 Sheet II: KAD.f\!I AL-370 c2 -3q [{PoD 4rOOM ~I~~~~~~~~ u f.lt~?=,~2_r,~c~?c9!;!~Ec~~~~~?F.!,,,c,~ Coefficient of Uti I irati on ''lilial Footcandles KAD R2 Test no. 1193083101 COEFrlCIENT or UTILIZATION .2 ,3 .5 .6 1 .4 400W Metal Halide lamp, 32,000 rated lumens, Foolcandlc values based on 30' mounting height, Distribulion Type II, clItoff. KAD R4 Test no, 1191110101 COEfflCIE/,n or UTILIZf;TION .3 .5 ,6 2 o 400W Ivletal Halide lamp, 32.000 rated lumens, Footcandle values based on 30' mounting height, Distribution Type IV. cutoff. KAD R3 Test no. 1192040902 COEffiCIENT Of UTILIZATION ,1 .2 ,3 ,4 g ,5 .6 '= ~ <.? "" Z :0 0 :2 is '" ~ ~ (j z ~ Ci 4 6 ,6 1 Electrical Characteristics Line current Primary Primilry (Amps) dropout Input Power Regulation Wattage/ballast voltage Start/Operating voltage watts factor (%) Line V ~ Lamp lumens 120 2,50/4,00 55 400CWA 208 1.45/2.30 95 Peak-lead 240 1,25/2,00 110 455 90+ i10% ,,10% Autotransformer 277 1,10/1.75 125 1,80 .7311.00 225 <.? ;;:: ~ :5 :z: o '" ,.. Z :0 ~ Z <t Vi " 400W Metal Halide lamp, 32,000 rated lumens, Footcandle valuns based on 30' mounting 11eigl1t. Distribution Type III, cutoff. ,..t:: _~-"",..,=+.=,.=-=.<;_.,_,_,.,_."c.,,~..,. _''''''~=~'"'':~_:. ,",~-..:_~..;:':c~.' =.'_';;-_~. -::.."",,~ KAD R5S Test no, 1193111901 KAD R4HS Test no, 1192061101 COEFfiCIENT Of UTllIZi\TION ,1 .01 g Tested to current IES ,md NEMA slnndards under stabilized laboratory conditions. VariOll5 operating factors can cause differences between laboratory data nnd actual field IllcaSUrenlents. Dimensions <Jnd specifications on this sheet are based on the most current (IVllilable d,Jta and are subject to change without notic(~. .~ ~ '5 :2 o '" " 'k I \ ill COEffICIEI-!T OF UTlLlZATlOI,I ~ ,2 ,) .ol ,6 1 ,., {3 ~ '" z ~ '" 0 2 - Z :0 ~ ~ w ~ ~ .1 ~ 6 Z :0 ~ z ~ ~ :.; ,IOOW Metal Halide lamp. 32,000 rHted lumens, Footcandle values based on 30' mounting height. Distribution Type IV. cutoff. '" z ;:: ~ ;, '" ~ Z =0 ~ ~ u ~ 'IOOW Metal Halide lamp. 32,000 rated lumens, Footcandle values based on 30' mounting height. Distribution Type V. cutorf. Mounting Height Correction factor (Multiply the fc level by the correction factor) 25 ft. ~ 1.44 35 ft. = 0,73 40 It. = ,56 / Existing Mounting Height \2 = Correction Factor \ New Mounting Height / I~"tes: 1 Photometric data for other distributions can be accessed from the Lithonia lighting website. (WW\'I..I.lithoniil.com) - 'A LfTHON/A LfGf~T/NG"l An <-<f\cuityBrands Company Sheet II: KAD-M .~; 2000 Acuity lighting Group. Inc., Rev. 9/04 Uthonia Lighting Acuity lighting Group, Inc. Outdoor One lithonia Way, Cmyers, GA ~0012 Phone: 110.922-9000 Fax: 770.910.1209 .In Canada: 160 a'!enue Labrosse, roinle.Clnir", ro.. 119R 1A1 Vy\.~.Jw.lithonia.t:om d-. -tfo ,~ LiTHDNiA LiGHTiNG - FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION Weldable.grade, hot.rolled, commercial'quality carbon steel tubing with a minimum yield of 55,000 psi (11-gauge), 50,000 psi (7.gauge). Uniform wall thickness 01 .125" or ,188". Shafts are one.piece with a longitudinal electric resistance weld, Unilormly square in cross-section with lIat sides, small corner radii and excellent torsion, Available shaft widths are 4", 5" and 6", Anchor base is fabricated Irom hot.rolled carbon steel plate that meets or exceeds a minimum yield strength 01 36,000 psi. The anchor base is provided with slotted holes. Base cover is finished to match pole, A handhole having nominal dimensions of 3" x 5" for all shalts. Included is a cover with attachment screws, Tall cap provided with all drill.mount poles. Fasteners are high.strength galvanized zinc.plated or stainless steel. FINISH - Dark bronze (DO B) polyester powder standard. Other architec. tural colors available, GROUNDING - A nut holder located immediately inside the handhole rim is Ilrovided with a 1/2" - 13 UNC ground bolt and nut. ANCHOR BOlTS.- Top protion of anchor bolt is galvanized per ASTM A. 153, Made 01 steel rod having a minimum yield strength of 55,000 psi. CAtalog Number SSS 16 4C DM49 DDS Notes rype 82 MACY'S SITE - CUPERTINO,CA Anchor Base Poles sss SQUARE STRAIGHT STEEL ORDERING INFORMATION Example: SSS 20 5C DM19 DDS Choose lhe boldface catalog nomenclature that best suits your needs and write it in lhe appropriate blank, SSS 10 - 39 feet ISee back page,) (See back page,) HAND HOLE ORIENTATION c ~;tjd o r-~-- , .f?~. ~\ I A Handhole NOTES: 1 When ordering tenon mounting and drill mounting for the same pole. follow this example: DM281T20, The combination requires an extra hafldhole. 2 3.1/2" and 4" tenons available on 5" and 6" shafts only, 3 The drilling lemplale 10 be used for a particular luminaire depends on the luminaife that is used. Refer to the Technical Data Section of the Outdoor Binder for Drilling Templates, Speciry location and orientation when ordering option. For 1st "x": Specify the height in feet above base 01 pole. Example: 5fr = 5 and 20fr = 20 For 2nd "x": Specify orientation from handhole IA.B,C,D) Rofer to tho Hanc/holo Orientation diagram on t!lis page. 5 Horizontal arm is 18" x 2-318" O.D, tenon standard. 6 Combination of tenon-top and drill mount requires extra hand hole. 7 Additional colors available; see Architectural Colors brochure. form no, 794,3. II Options Mounting' Tenon Mounting Shipped Installed Archilectural Colors PT Open top LlAB LossAnchor BoilS (powder linish!' T20 2.3/S' 0,0. (2" NPSI VD Vibration Damper Standard Colors TP Tamper Proof DDB Dark bronze T25 2.7/S" 0.0. (2-1/2' NPS) HXX4.5 Horizontal Arm T30z 3-1/2" 0.0. 13" NPS) BrAcket (llixlure) DWH White T352 4" 0,0. (3.1/2" NPS) FDLxx' Festoon Outlelless DBl Black Drill Mounting' electriCAl Classic Colors FGLxx' Festoon GFI Outlet DMB Medium bronze DM19 1 at90. less electrical DNA Natural DM28 2 at ISO. 12CPxx' 112" Coupling aluminum o M28PL 2 at 180. with one side 34CPxx' 3/4" Coupling DSS Sandstone plugged 1 CPxx' 1" Coupling DGe Charcoaloray DM29 2 at90. 12NPxx' 112" Threaded Nipple DM39 3 at 90. 34NPxx' 3/4"Threaded Nipplo DTG Tennis green DM49 4 at 90. 1NPxx' 1"Threaded Nipple DBR Brightred Aeris Drill Mounting' HHxx'.6 Extra Handhole DSB Stoel blue DM19AS 1 a190. GAlV Galvanized finish DM2DAS 2atlS0. DM29AS 2 at90. DM39AS 3 at 90. DM49AS 4 at 90. IMPORTANT INSTAllATION NOTES: . Do not erect poles withoul having fixtures installed. . Factory.suppliedlemplales must be used when setting anchor bolls. Lithonia will not accept claim lor incorrect anchorage placement due to failuro to uso IActory lemplate. . If poles are stored outside, all protective wrApping must be removed immediately to prevent finish damage. . Lithonia is not responsible for Ihe foundAtion design, . Installation requires grout to he packed under base to enS\ac full contact with foundation. Outdoor Sheet#: Pole-SSS PL . 320 J-t/1 SSS Square Straight Steel Poles TECHNICAL INFORMATION EPA (ft') with 1.3 gust Nominal Wall Approximate Catalog shaft Pole Shaft Thickness 80 Max, 90 Max, 100 Max, Bolt Circle Bolt Size ship weight Number lenQth (feet) Size(in x in x It) (inches) GauQe mph weiQht mph weiQht mllh weiaht (inches) (in, x in. x in.) {poundsl SSS 10 4C 10 4,0 x 10.0 0,125 11 30.6 765 23.8 595 18,9 473 8..9 3/4 x 18x3 75 SSS 12 4C 12 4.0 x 12,0 0.125 11 24,4 610 188 470 14.8 370 8--9 3/4 x 18x3 90 SSS 14 4C 14 4,0 x 14,0 0.125 11 19.9 498 15.1 378 11.7 293 8..9 3/4 x 18x3 100 SSS 16 4C 16 4.0 x 16,0 0,125 11 15.9 398 11,8 295 8,9 223 8..9 3/4x18x3 115 SSS 18 4C 18 4,0 x 18.0 0,125 11 12,6 315 9,2 230 6.7 168 '8..9 3/4 x 18x3 125 SSS 20 4C 20 4.0 x 20,0 0,125 11 9.6 240 6,7 167 4,5 150 B..9 3/4 x 1Bx3 140 SSS 20 4G 20 4.0 x 20.0 0,188 7 16.5 415 12,25 310 9,3 240 B..9 3/4 x 30 x 3 198 SSS 20 5C 20 5,0 x 20,0 0,125 11 17.7 443 12.7 343 9,4 235 10..12 1 x 36 x 4 lB5 SSS 20 5G 20 5.0 x 20.0 O.lBB 7 28,1 703 21.4 535 16.2 405 10.-12 1 x 36 x 4 265 SSS 25 4C ,25 4.0 x 25,0 0.125 11 4,B 150 2,6 100 1,0 50 8..9 3/4xlBx3 170 - SSS 25 4G 25 4,0 x 25.0 O,18B 7 10.B 270 7,7 1BB 5.4 135 8.-9 3/4 x 30 x 3 245 SSS 25 5C 25 5.0 x 25,0 0.125 11 9.B 245 6,3 157 3.7 150 10.: 12 1 x 36 x 4 225 1----. --._----- -.. SSS 25 5G 25 5,0 x 25,0 O,lB8 7 lB,O 350 12,6 350 9,0 250 10-.12 1 x 36 x 4 320 SSS 30 4G 30 4,0 x 30,0 0.18B 7 6.4 160 4,0 100 2,3 5B 8..9 3/4 x 30 x 3 295 ...---- SSS 30 5C 30 5,0 x 30,0 0,125 11 4.7 150 2,0 50 .. .. 10-.12 1 x 36 x 4 265 SSS 30 5G 30 5,0 x 30,0 0.188 7 10.7 267 6.7 167 3,9 100 10.-12 1 x 36 x 4 380 -------- -.. SSS 30 6G 30 6.0 x 30.0 0,188 7 15.7 392 10.2 257 6.4 160 11..13 1 x 36 x 4 520 SSS 35 5G 35 5.0 x 35.0 0.188 7 5,9 150 2,5 100 .. .. 10..12 1 x 36 x 4 440 --....-... SSS 35 6G 35 6,0 x 35,0 0.188 7 9.5 237 5,0 150 1.8 50 11..13 1 x 36 x 4 540 SSS 39 6G 39 6.0 x 39,0 O,18B 7 5.1 12B 1.3 33 -- .. 11..13 1 x 36 x 4 605 ...__..~~ A ,I ~:..-~--~._~~ It>. . ,.'i'fl I '''):-C--.J" fv i I,_._,.! ""/,~.. ".... j I, ", I l~_.. V . (~J ,,{..____.-.J., k-- c ~I B ShaH Bolt Bolt Base Anchor Warehouse Template Base Circle Projection Square Bolt Anchor Bolt Number Size A B C Description Description 4'C B.1/2" 2.3/4'-4' B" ABSSS.4C AB1B'0 PJ50004 4"G B.l/2" 2-3/4"-4' B' ABSSS-4G AB30.0 PJ50004 5" 10"-12" 3.3/B'-4" 11" ABSSS.5 AB36-0 PJ50010 6" 11"-13" 3.3/8"-4" 12.1/2" ABSSS-6 AB36.0 PJ50011 "l, '" ,r:;:-:-...= .n'" r. u f1 c:..: I" Ii i! Lb BASE DETAIL i I I :.;: ~" , 1<7 { .: ~/_T""" ~\ rs... 'i,/ '''~ " w IMPORTANT: . Those specifications Hre intended lor general purposes only. lithonia mscn'os Ihe right to change material or design, wilhoul prior notice, in a continuing effort to upgrade its products. , ~ L/THDN/A L/GHTJ'NG - Lithonia Lighting Acuity Lighting Group, Inc. Outdoor Lighling One Lithoni. Way" Conyers, GA 30012 Phone: 770.922-9000 Fax: 770,918.1209 In Canada: 1100 50th Ave" Lachine, Quebec fiST 2V3 www.lilhonia.colll An ~'lcuJtvBrand5 Company Sheet it: Pole-SSS @1994 Lithoni" Lighting, Rev. 6102 Pole,SSS,P65 J..--I.f:A , , "'1 ~ ~ i "1 ., 'I "I ., ., ., ., "' ., ., ., ., .,., ., .,., tI 'I' t ~ l; "I" .,",., ., ., ';) T, tJI ________________----1 Plan View ~ -r r -r -r South Elevation LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE Symbol "" CalalogNurrber Description lamp Lumens LLF oCl~t:> Lilhonia;KAD DIE-CAST CUTOFF ONE 400-WATT CLEAR 32000 4OOMR4HS LUMINAIRE WITH HOUSE BT-37 METAL HALIDE, 0 SIDE SHIELD HORlZONTAL POSlTION lithonia:KAD DIECAST TYPE IV. ONE 115.WATT CLEAR 12000 0,12 '" 0 175MR4 SHORT, CUTOFF BT-28 METAL HALIDE. LUMINAIRE HORIZONTAL POSITION STATISTICS NOTES Description Symbol Min MaXiMin AvgiMin 1. Fixture B mountingheoght: 20 -0. AFG 2. Fidure H mounting height: 10 - O. AFG A", CaIcZor.e#l ", or, NfA + + ", 14fc Northwest View 16500CalculalionsDisc.laimer Calculalioos i1re perfOl'med using industry-recogniZed soflware, and are proyided fores timation purposes only_ Input data for the calculations corresponds to the information provided to us (assumptions may be made lor information that isnolprovKled). It is the responsibility 01 those USIng Ihis service to verily thai OUf inpuldat a is consistent with expecledlieldconditions. ResultsolthelighHngcelculationsaccurat&lyreflectlheinpuldata However, actual lighling levels will vary depending on field conditions su chesroomChefBClIlristics,temperature, voltage, and lamplbaMast output and other ractol'1l. Calculations are also subject 10 ltle limitations of the software, Due to the above considerations, 16500cannotguaranteethalactuallight~elsmeasuredinthelieldwillmalchouriniliel calculations '<:t I 0.. C/') ->. () ro ~ I O'l c :s2 L- ro 0.. o () ro > Designer Ariel Labra Date 9.20-06 Scale Drawing No. 1 of 2 c:2-Lf3 NORTH PARKIN:G GARAGE PLANNING SUBMITTAL - - - - - - F A 5 H 0 N PAR K Cupertino, California SEPTEMBER 11, 2006 o c L L A v L1~)~~~~1E~K MANAl,EMENT I!fJl valleo ;::aSl1ion Park lANN,"! Gl SANDISI Panlcol/V Cllatles P~llkQW Bylhlers, lid. $. ~lS SIl~ f'VN ~""L INFO~w.rIO'ICDNr...t1EC i'ti/'EtlISPRElNUIAAY THE .tIfORW-TKW Fl<O~Ct:D ot<IIIGPlHlIW)D:DlOllATAINlllrROlolOOltlCl:OTII.Ol'J'CIXDoIRD.WlL[ IfQY.CI't:R~K3lJr.I~>,IO RESPO~$lBlI..lfVFOI< ll"SACnR~Y AI..l.EU..ONOS. 'fEN,WI'SANOTHElG:SIl.S;';HOWl 011 TI<15 ~VIU. O<f.NGEll.IRtlGT~DESlGNfIilOCESS Perkowitz + Ruth ....lcHITEer 6001\,,,100 )or.(ost"I~' VALLCO FASHION PARK NORTH PARKING STRUCTURE CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA ~ SANDIS PankoVlf ~Mt'" Plnlo. Build.., lid. 'lIlNNUS L~Jk~~K t.tA..'lAGEMD>lT -::e.,~rk 1<.1 rJldl_. RCI~.sua. :!lIlQ, c..,._, C;'95a~ IOElNO .2BB_2~ DATE 9-11-06 Campus Plan SHEET 01 P-r: ~ I NOTE: EXISTING TREES THAT REMAIN ARE SHOWN IN THIER EXACT LOCATION PER SITE SURVEY ASSlJ~ED PR()P[RIY lK IS Sf] ~T 11'-C. fllON 1ll.UIUl, 11'P1CI.l TREE TABLE: 0 EXISITNG REDWOOD 0 EXISITNG ASH @ PROPOSED TREE ~~ PROPOSED GREEN SCREEN VINES HARDSCAPE PAVING TREES IN PLANTER BOXES (TYP, Landscape Plan SHEET 02 lOBNO R ~ 03-288,2~ . 09_1Dl~~ +\. L/~j~S~~A.~:~K \t\~'\(;I'.~II:"\lT -::fl!::- LA"Nl"~ ~ SANDIS PanIcOlN' Chaflu Pankow Byllders, Ltd. Por [47'J] VALLCO FASHION PARK NORTH PARKING STRUCTURE CUPERTINO. CALIFORNIA ,hinglofl, [H:>I Intl EB 150' 25' 100' SCALE F :F o SO' nus SI'[ "LAN >.NO ~ll ,Nm"",UIO" CONTAINEO ><EflU.. III P'flHrMINAAV THE 11ll'000""TIO'" PFlOl/IOrD ONTHISPV......S9H..Of\Allll<(OFll(l...SClUFlcar>MTWEDH...llElIAlllE.H(l\li[IIfRWE.,SSUMEfOO IIfBPONMlLlT'1 ~OR IT'!! ACCUIl,o,cV 'l..lBUUJ'N(l$. lfl;ANT8NlD THf: USE8AS 8HOW"ION rn~ f'I..Nl wu Cl<""ClEDUfI"'GTtl[llE81~AAIJCE" Perkowitz + Ruth ARCHITECT 25' SCALE ~ o 50. Perkowitz + Ruth ARCHITECTS 0-[~---~ @-_u @-~-- @------ @---- @---- @-~---~- 100' ,...-.... I-~--' Cd N 15,] i <jlCPCPCP Cfl ~cpcp~~~~~ '? <f~G?G? i jJ - 1 PARKING SPACES PERMITTED 561 PARKING SPACES ADDED 148 PARKING SPACES TOTAL 709 VALLeo FASHION PARK NORTH PARKING STRUCTURE CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA A SANDISI"''''''''''"' U' .LANN<RS PanlcolN Charles Pankow Bulldllrs, Ltd. _J.I','rgds I;" 4th Floor Plan SHEET 03 JOBNO R ~ 03-28825 . 09-1~~~~ ~ ARCHITECTS ~1)N!H!Wl:S1'!Ilw.Tl.lI<PllOY(l( Cll[{NSC!t![~ P!>HELS FOIl T~ FU1 NEOO fllot.o GfW)[TOIOI~ TOPor SlIM.:Rc.taLS.=~lIIIN""YB[ O\I!mDA1J>fCOl~>IlllOTlUl:;OUl !IIlWITS. PflWlJ[GRITMSCR[OjI)NIH[ NOIlT\tAAOSO\l1'HFOIlON(S1'~fIl' @ ~ t i i ~ I i i i ~ r i I I ~ r I I I ~ r I <f? T i I WEST ELEVATION ~ T I I I ~ t i i ~ T i I i ~ ~ r i i cp r I o r I i ~ cy CfJ f I I i CD 1.0. lI;II5TW~, n:-moo LO,PII!I-f'O -~~~~ 'aiifil'- 3" ~fui:;t.._..~ .~-ij:;i.._..~ ir~~.~'- 00 EAST ELEVATION East & West Elevation SCALE 9C' VALLCO FASHION PARK SHEET 04 31 NORTH PARKING STRUCTURE ~ SANDISI"''''"'''''''' u~J~~1~\'~:~K iJ :~::~:::' JOBNO R ~ \l.-\:\N;I\-~[:-;T 0328825 . CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA PanicoIN' -::-f~on O>~rk i~~~~ ~ Chilll"sPallkowBullders.Ltd '01n""".h\'Icir.~.",.a.~.2Q3C Co-1""droo.CAi/S(j Perkowitz + Ruth P141 !j50.~ ISG , [50J!!.7 {~ 791 Rou ARCHITECT (Cfl/(NTP\.ASle:RflNlSH) 60 15' 15' SCALE ~ o 30 ~ /513ZA ~QUNTING CUP - w:, ~~N,~~ G) 151J2P t.lQIJNT\~G CLIP - ~~, ~o~~~ CD PANEL SCHEDULE :1~,t ~~;l ij~~ : ~;~~~ "m:~ ~ ~ 60 90' Perkowitz + Ruth ARCHITECTS VALLeo FASHION PARK NORTH PARKING STRUCTURE CUPERINq CALIFORNIA A SA...1DISI"''''''''''"' ~ .... PlANNlR, PanlcolN Cnarles Pankow BlIllders, Ltd. Green Screen Details SHEET 05 JOStlO 03-28825 DATE 09-11-06 R:~ ARCH IT EeTS Perkowitz + Ruth ARCHITECT 16th FlOOf, Residential Site Section VALLCO FASHION PARK SHEET 06 NORTH PARKI NG STRUCTURE ~ SANDISI~i:1m L~mlW~~K '~:,"~5 R- ~ \L.\N!\C;U.lf.'ST CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA PankolN valcO~= DATE I P.nkQwB 1~'~ '1_ WoI!8 Rmd. s.... ZO~, ClIp..-.CAi!iOI4 1.11.06 ~ 8!XlJ.."" [5611 lOLong 11:92 !703ifiilS '''<jlon, [S03IJ7 lilJld. all. 1 271.8090 RO'l"'~ AR h @ 83'.0" ~<O. VIEW FROM 45 FEET AT PARKING STRUCTURE _~/z;or EXISITNG RESIDENCE ".(). SECTION AA IMAGE OF REAR WALL FROM BACK YARD ADJACENT TO PARKING STRUCTURE VIEW FROM EET AT PARKING STRUCTURE 83'-0' - - 20.-0" SECTION BB Residential Site Section VALLCO FASHION PARK SHEET07 NORTH PARKING STRUCTURE ~ SANDISI""''''''"' L 7,tJJ?~~'1'~~K 'LONNfftS JOBNO R ~ 1,1.\"'\CE\~E\'T 03-288.25 . CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA Panko"" -::!I~~ 09-~;~~ -tL 411l~O 3400 I:J ll)~ I 0 po::> 1 11l'1Cjl [.179]271.809 EET AT PARKING STRUCTURE ~/Vbr VIEW FROM VIEW FROM 45 FEET AT PARKING STRUCTURE 1T'~~ IMAGE OF REAR WALL FROM BACK YARD ADJACENT TO PARKING STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE, Perkowitz + Ruth ....RCHITECT EXISTING CAMPUS RETAIL AREA Existing Sears retail Existing Macy's retail Existing JCPenney retail Existing mall retail Existing restaurants Existing restaurants TOTAL EXISTING AREA Existing parking at Sears Existing parking at JCPenney Existing parking at structure 1 (3 levels) Existing parking at structure 2 (3 levels) Other existing parking on Vallco campus TOTAL EXISTtNG PARKING ON CAMPUS 1.,\, .tlll"''I'::::II.~:4 !o....II~ (tWM"l'JI :.III..... :#" :~~lIh'lt"I.f".11 EXISTING CAMPUS RETAIL AREA Existing Sears retail 280,185 s.f. @ 3.98 : 1000 s.f, Existing Macy's retail 176,962 s.f, @ 4.06 : 1000 s.f, Existing JCPenney retail 202,360 s.f, @ 3,85: 1000 s.f, Existing mall retail 474,744 s.f. @ 4,09: 1000 s.f, Existing restaurants (W) 8,960 s.f. @ 4.44 : 1000 s.f, Existing restaurants (E) 9,500 s.f, @ 4,04 : 1000 s.f. EXISTING REQ'D, STALLS 1,152,711 PROPOSED CAMPUS RETAIL AREA Existing Sears retail 280,185 s.f, @ 3,98 : 1000 s.f, Existing Macy's retaii 176,962 s.f. @ 4,06: 1000 s.f. Existing JCPenney retail 202,360 s.f, @ 3,85 : 1000 s.f, retail @ UL 189,447 s.f, @ 4.09: 1000 s.f. retail @ LL 134,267 s.f, @ 4,09 : 1000 s.f, New cinema 80,500 s.f, @ 4,09: 1000 s.f. Exstg, restaurant @ north lot 8,960 s.f, @ 4.44 : 1000 s.f. New Wolfe Rd. retail New Vallco pkwy retail retail UL retail LL 34,000 s.f. @ 3.85 : 1000 s.f, 11,000 s.f.@ 3.85: 1000 s.f, 71,448 s.f. @ 3.85 : 1000 s.f. 64,470 s.f. @ 3.85: 1000 s.f, Exstg. restaurant (Alexanders) 9,500 s.f. @ 4.04: 1000 s.f. New Wolfe/Stevens Creek retail 11,700 s.f,@ 3.98: 1000 s.f, New Rose Bowl retail 105,000 s.f, @ 4,04: 1000 s.f, PROPOSED REQ'D. STALLS 1,379,799 s./, GLA .11"".:'4 =1I1111:4::111:,"':"~1I1 ~1~'h'."'.\'JI:J I J- Perkowitz + Ruth ARCH!TECT> TOTAL EXISTING PARKING ON CAMPUS 280,185 s.f. 176,962 s.f, 202,360 s,f, 477,633s.f. 9,500 s.f. 8,960 s.f. 1,155,600 s.f, EXISTING CAMPUS PARKING REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION North surface parking Surface parking north of Macy's Surface parking at Wolfe Road mall entrance Surface parking at Wolfe Road mall entrance Surface parking at Wolfe Road on Penney's property Surface parking at Wolfe Road on Vallco's property Surface parking at Rose Bowl Surface parking at StevenslWolfe Surface parkinq at cinema west exit stairs SUBTOTAL OF PARKING STALLS REMOVED 796 stalls 939 stalls 698 stalls 418 stalls 1,955 stalls 4,806 stalls NET CUMULATIVE PARKING ON CAMPUS '..'-"('1'.:11 North parking garage Rose bowl parking garage East parking garage (on Penney's property) East parking on Penney's property Surface parking at Wolfe Road on Vallco's property Street parking on Vallco Parkway Surface parking at Wolfe Road mall entrance Surface parking at Wolfe Road mall entrance Parking on Rose Bowl service road Parking on Alexanders road Parking on Hotel road Parkinq on perimeter road at north parkinq qaraqe SUBTOTAL OF PARKING STALLS PROVIDED 1115 stalls 718 stalls 779 stalls 1942 stalls 40 stalls 38 stalls 4,633 stalls 1115 stalls 718 stalls 779 stalls 775 stalls 549 stalls 329 stalls PROPOSED CAMPUS RETAIL AREA TOTAL PROVIDED PARKtNG ON CAMPUS 40 stalls 11ft' .t1IIIr'lIl:1.I:,m:II:lIJ.:1 :I.IM" M:.l.I"':I" :"~"I~It'W:"''I11 131 stalls 42 stalls 275 stalls 248 stalls 38 stalls 47 stalls 424 stalls 5,511 stalls ....'1l.~F.1h... VALLCO FASHION PARK NORTH PARKING STRUCTURE ~ SAN OISI"'''''''''"' V PLANNERS Ch~!!~~~d. CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 4,806 stalls 541 stalls 158 stalls 67 stalls 25 stalls 288 stalls 65 stalls 688 stalls 102 stalls 20 stalls 1,954 stalls 2,852 stalls 709 stalls 1,191 stalls 654 stalls 8 stalls 65 stalls 34 stalls 34 stalls o stalls 34 stalls 14 stalls 21 stalls 28 stalls 2,792 stalls 1,379,799 s.f. 5,644 stalls '.m....III.EIi Campus Parking Calculations SHEET 08 JOB NO 03-18815 DATE {l~-11-0G p~~ ARCHIHCTS EXHIBITS BEGIN HERE #~ PROI'OSED.. LEVEL P ARJill;'O STRL"C"IL"RE 709 STAllS I j I 'I -9 PROPOSED 139 ATIACHED CO~MINlUMS &: TOM."HOUSES \ \,' -.'.:... ~.~~ A- '"t' . "\-' ~:,," _~~:....,t'~ t:>t..,~",,'t' ~,+ ~~'.,,""'" "'... .:! ~'" PROPOSED 211 ROOM HOTEL SITE PROPOSED 6 ' lEVEL rARKI:>:G STRUC"IL"RE 1150 STAllS ' , '?: (~ ' /' 11 i '. ., f/ f' .... .' PROPOSED 3 ,LEVEL rARKING STRUCTL"RE 7'25 STAllS Parking Options p' \.4 t , :( :~ J' I~ . .~i i 1~ ; Ij , ,LU:;___ -~r" ---, AI ;, -"'":\'r I, (~~~~~:.~:k~':::~;'~~"L~~'- P_,- ..,:,._u - '~7 ", .. t~: ~L F,YY>:'~" .~- ': .'Y' ( l!:;) '" ',~ ::*" '~:r: ;1 '~' 1-4 jd t I ,.l" 'r I ~~~ PROPOSED.. I.EVEr_ PARKC'i'G STRUCTURE 709 ST AIl.S ... -)~~~--:..:>C'. PROPOSED 139 A TIACHED 'Qption r .:.. ;,;" '" ... "4.~~;:" 4t:;~;~ ~'....~ 4,,4.~~~" .:.:;~'~ ~ PROPOSED 6 LEVEL rARlm'G STRt:C1't."RE 1150 STAll.S "~.""";~~~'.<<) ')~-": t:. : ~;~f~"::;:~;t?j~~~;~ ~ ,\ ~ ,/ ~-.u~r~'>t :',~'~;~)~;,~ \ ~; ~~' ,- l~.: J L::=~~ _,~~~~~~"~~~~" :" "p'~lOn ""-;'-~ji~~~~"~~~~-~(6wnedby Je 7~ STAlLS Penny) PROPOSED 211&OOM HOTEL SITE Option 2 3 IMAGE OF REAR WALL FROM BACK YARD ADJACENT TO PARKING STRUCTURE VIEW FROM 45 FEET AT PARKING STRUCTURE VIEW FROM 45 FEET AT PARKING STRUCTURE Access Ramp 'T.!.ii;~ \ ~L"_~"; f' ~^--""""":~, ~y .n;. ~~ SECTION BB I i ~ the iRafnpi ; i .20) ,.. ' ; ; i D~lete ~6 Stalls Ql1 I ' I : ~ @ ~ ~ Cf J>:c.!'~,_<LL-+~+-"C i i i i Wall! i I I i <fJ i Parapet I i I cr - --------cg ~ + + ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +~l~f~ ~1-j~!~I~i-i Iii i i I Iii Iii ! i Si Ilod I , Oi" I I I I 01 4:- j i i i I I i i i ill i i i i I I '1) " -t~ r rr-n 9 ~ I i ~:.-' 9 \:l 1'"' D , Wall _~~<~^~'!st~~"""'.~ .{;~~:.~-:::t: _., . l!:'::: ;'~'_.'nd"":',~'~:~: "~iir~~:r::-"~l ! '1' ~~~~ '.'; r-J ~" .. -:-;~~:~:'::C-: l"'lt' Ii.' "'.' ;>4 1 . W ) : ~~,: f 11 ii '1'1 i )\1:1 J !J.> \~h-! II ii,." :~m~ ~OPOSED 4 LEVEL ARKC'i'G STRUcn; 70'1 :iT AlJS IRE PRorosm , " ....TIACHED1.l'l " Qptio" >"rol~~= " n ....~.......:......:....... ... ,.,. ~ ,~/:t, ... ,..-<; '(,~'~'i! o ..,,;;,~' . ",~..."" ~..;- ~4I:"" . ~ ,../:-.,.' I : ! i PROPOSED 111 ROO~ HOTEL SITE :>,,,~,""">~~"""" ,"'--- ";"",:, " . ,~~:';jrFI~':~; 1)1..' F ,,',"""'" ' ! ",n ""I" "-" /' l .' .c;.'t;ltf~~~:i;~:.. ~~f~n Option 2 PROPOSED 4 LEVEL PARKC'i'G STRUCTL'RE 7W STAlLS ! ~ .' \t>4 <t ~. m: ,I :I~i ';;.?> < ...' I:. .;J11. 1"~"-'i; ,::M"',. , ~ I : '/ .:.. .'" ... '" '" ,:.t.~fby" '\" " '10'<,. .+ " "'..,:'~ 4.J"'\,,;~~/ .. "" ~;e.'~ ~ I'ROPOSED lll.ROOM HOTEL SITE I'ROPOSED 6 LEVEl. rARKC'i'G 5TRLTTL"RE 1150 STAl,L5 .... " ( . h <~ (0 ~ <b ~ <et (~ ~ ~ 0 i t ~.. ~ bit ~ ~ U n ~. i ~ - - - -- -- -- -- - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - ~ - .... ~ II ..... ogo 1 '1:1' ..~ ~ .a. T J~ ... -- I.. ~~-- ~ ... .~- ..~ ~ """ J ol:lo ogo ..... ~ogo ..- ... .L ~ . - - -- J I I I I I I -. r-- . ~ ~ -- ~ .. i--- ol:lo - ogo ogo~ - "E- 4~ "1---0 - ~ .. .... - ~ ~ ...... .,.. . ~ ol:lo - .. .. .... ol:lo -~ - .... .1--- _"II' ... - .... . ... .. L · - ~ - ogo ;- .. 'I' .., 'V r .. - IQ - .. ..- ~ .. .... - ~~ .... ~-z - ~ ..- - -L 01... .~ ( - ~... ogo ...~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .-; 'ogo ~ oE:to ~ oE:to - I.... '-T - ... - "-II "-- Mil 148 ~ ~ gt;t.CES PmWT1ID ~ gt;t.CES DIm PAJIIB: ~E!I mr.u. - +-'~'-+- I , I' ~ , +- !+- I , 'I ~ , ~ I +--~---F !~ I ~ i ~ i~c_~ ' , I !p i i i i [ , 6' ~"O 8cr~erl Wall! I I I I I ! i Iii i ! i i i i ij ~ I +- t ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ij ~ I I I' ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~, ~ i i [ i i i i i! I I I I I I I I , i j i I j i i ! I 'T---i'-I-' -i-'l' --1- - -1---\--'1'1, -f- I I I I I I I I i ! i i i i i i i i IE},_ I ' " "., '\,., -,-- 1 I I I I I 1 I ! i i ! i i i i ! ~ i< '-'-'-.F' C3 :, ~ ; ~===, oJ~~ S61 148 109 PARKf\;C Sf'AC,S HRt-AllrD CJA~K NC SPIIU.S f,CDlD ;JA,RKNC SP!<.ClS 10L:lL ,+--~, 4-- 1 , i -M , 1'-- I , , -r-- I , 'I ~ i -r +-~--F !-r I -===-l i -L I rB' '~ ' 'I~, ' I I ! i ~ . ! I I I I + + I I I I .. .. ------ I III i I I I I I I I I I I ! I "-t"-1 , J IJ , ,I ! I, ! I~+-'- ! . , ! --- ~ I ~ I I I I I ! I I I I I I +- + ~ I I I I EXISTING CAMPUS RETAIL AREA Exist<>g S~ retail Exist""O Macy's rela,l ExistmQ JC?enney~' Ex.st<lg mao. roWl Exist.na r-estilUrdrKSc ExistmQ I'OSlaura~ TOTAl EXISTING AREA Exis!mjj prlJnll al ~ Exist"ll p-rii"ll at JCPenney Exi5t<lg p.vlIing at stTuc!un; 1 .(3 ""'e!s) Exislmg p.vlIi"ll at stTuc!un; 2.(3 revels) Clh... ...Sling parting "" Val"'" carrpu. TOTAl EXISTING PARKING ON CAMPUS .....,..u.,' I~'.=- fl..'" II ..1ft. "'.' ~~u.... :I.'t.~~tl;,{n"".lIl EXISTING CAMPUS RETAIl AREA EXisf"l1 5Rrs relail 280.185 sf @ 3,98 ' 1000 s3 ExisMg Macy's relail 176.ll62 sf @ 4,06 '1000 s.f, Exist"lj JCPenn"y """" 2ll2.3tiO s.t@ 3,85: 1000 sJ, Existng mail1'elail 474.744 sf, @ 4,09: 1000 sJ, Ex~ rost>urants (W) S ,Q030 sf @ 4.44 : 1000 sf Ex~ rost>ura~(EJ 9.500 sf@ 4,[)4, 100e sf EXISTING REQ'D. STAlLS 1,152,711 PROPOSED CAMPUS RETAIl AREA Exist"ll 5.!<<rs reull 21H).I85 sf @ 398 ' 1OtJO sf Ex'smg Macy's rel3i1 lTMe2 s,f@ 4,Oe 1000 sf Exist<lg JCp"nney rei... 202.3tiO >.f @ 3,85, 1000 s,1. mail @ UL lS~,447 sf @ 4.09 1000 sJ retail @ lL 134.257 sf, @ 4,09 , 1000 sJ. Ne.. cinema &::,500 sf @ 4.09 : 1000 sJ, ExSlll, ,,,.,tau,,,,,!@ north k>t S,Q030 sJ, @ 4,44 1000 sJ, 34.000 sf @ 3.85 1000 sJ 11.000 sf @ 1.85,1000 sf 71.443 sf@ 3,85: 1000 sJ 64.47-0 sf @ 3.85 ' 1000 sJ New Wolf. Rd, ,_ New Valloo pl;W1 ,,,tail w.aiIUL mailLL EiSlll resuurant!Alexander.;) Q,5oo sf @ 4.04 1000 sf New WcJfe;'Si:evens cree: .retail 11.700 .1. @ 3.00 1000 sJ New Rose 3cm< "",II 105.000 sf. @ 4.04 1000 sf PROPOSED REQ'D. STAllS U79, m d. GLA TOTAL EXISTING PARKING ON CAMPUS 4.BOB stalls 280,185 sJ, 17e,r162 sJ. 202,360 sJ. 477 ,!la3 s.f 9.500 sJ, 8,~D s.t 1.155,800 d. EXlSTlNG CAMPUS PAR.KlNG REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION North sw-faceparltiog Surf""" parking north of Maoy's Surf.... p....ing ai l'Io1f~ Road mall entrance Su~ p....ing at l'Iol~ R"ad mall ""_ Su~ parking at Wclre Read on Penney's property Surfare p....ing at Wolre Read on Vall"'''s prope<1)' Surfa.."" p....ing at Row Bowl Surface parking ai Si..-....."fuWe Surf""" parkina at cinema west exil stairs SUBTOTAl OF PARKtHG STALlS REMOVED 641 stalls 1M stall. C7 stalls ~5 stalls 28a stalls e5 stalls 088 stalls 102 s..lIs 20 stalls 1,954 staUs 7Q6 stalls 939 stalls CP8 stills 418 stills 1.955 stalls 4,806 staBs NET CUMULATIVE PARKtHG ON CAMPUS 2.852 staUs .I"'III".-.~ Notlh parking garag.o Rose !>Owl p-rii"G gange EaS't paRing garag.. (on Penney's property) East paRi!\g on """'..y's property Surf.... p....ing al WoW.. Read on Val"""s plope<ty , street PaOOnll on Vall<:<> P....way Surface p....ing at Wolre Road mall ""_ Surfare paning at Wolfe Read mall ""~ PArking "" ~ Bow; seMce road Parking on A!exaIIder.; roaa Parking <>n Hotel road Parking on perim_ read al n<>rtn parkil1ll Qa"'lle SUBTOTAl OF PARKtHG STALlS PROVIDEIl 709 stalls 1,191 stalls l\54 stalls 8 stall. 65 stall. ::l4 stalls ::l4 stall. o mils ::l4 stalls 14 mils 21 mils 28 stall. 2.192 stalls 1115 stail. 716 stall. 77ll stalls 1\1<42 stalls 40 stalls 38s_ 4.633 stalls 1115 stalls lIS stalls 779 stalls 775 stills 549 stalls 329 stall. PROPOSED CAMPUS RETAIl AREJI 1,319.7" s.l, TOTAL PROVIDED PARKING ON CAMPUS S,W stalls 1.".lI.n.'"I=I.:t~l.r:6I'},,,''=I..''' f:i;n..':l'-':'i'~'~- In..,"'1 .~~_It:t:-:t- 40 slals 131s_ 42._ 275 s_ 248 st:a1ls 3S stalls 47sta!1s 424 staills 5,511 slals ------ Tf:f~ Ht? r- SECTION AA W-Q' !lS TO "" I I (}) /" L-P'#'f.o'i!?*- ;'I"ffN ~1"N..>1 ~ ~ ...... ." . ~ - " ~ ~ 'r'~ t 8 @ ~ I I~ r t I I , i I : I I , l ! 8 <P r q:; & ,.... o W-r t I @ G) ~ @ -.., @ lt~ "4 ,~ t- If' H.-' I B r.: \A 'f' ~ L-" Cc ID ilt/Dh #2.. CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE September 13, 2006 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on September 13, 2006. PROTECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application No.: Applicant: Location: ASA-2006-19, M-2006-05 (EA-2006-17) Mike Rohde (Vallco Fashion Park) 10123 N. Wolfe Road DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST Modification to a use permit (U-2005-19) for the parking structure north of Macy's to exceed the permitted 32-foot limit and to allow parking on the fourth level FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Mitigated Negative Declaration mitigating Visual, Sound and Lighting Impacts that also provides a noise baffling of the 4th level such that it screens off the cars not just above 32-feet, but further down the ramp; that there are no parked cars visible over the 4-foot pony wall if one is approved or above the 32-foot level if that is the limit. If a 4-foot pony wall is approved, the een screen shall be extended up to it. Also, a Noise Impact Analysis be preparedP~~ng. Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development g/ercjREC EA-2006-17