Loading...
DRC Reso 248 R-2006-49 CITY OF C UPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino,California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 248 OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A 618- SQUARE FOOT SECOND STORY ADDITION TO AN EXISTING SINGLE-STORY RESIDENCE WITH AN EXCEPTION FOR REDUCED FRONT YARD AND REAR YARD SECOND STORY SETBACKS SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: R-2006-49 Applicant: Steve Benzing Location: 10501 N. Portal Avenue SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has held one or more public hearings on this matter;and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title. 2. That the approval of the exceptions will not result in a condition that is materially detrimental to the public health, safety,or welfare. 3. That the exceptions to be granted are ones that will require the least modification of the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose. 4. The proposed exception will not result in significant visual impact as viewed from abutting properties, NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the design review application is hereby approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application R-2006-49 set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Coininittee meeting of February 1, 2007 are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Resolution No. 248 R-2006-49 February 1, 2007 Page 2 SECTION III. CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED PROTECT This approval is based on a plan set prepared by Steve Benzing, Architect, for a second story addition at 10501 N. Portal Avenue for Mr. & Mrs. Scott Murray, dated October 20, 2006, consisting of three sheets, except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Design Review Committee. 3. SECOND STORY WINDOWS The applicant shall provide obscure glazing on all second story windows on the rear (west) elevation of the addition to mitigate privacy impacts onto the adjacent neighbors to the west. The type of obscure glazing shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 4. SECOND STORY SETBACKS The applicant is granted approval of an exception to the front yard and rear yard second story setbacks in accordance with the approved plan set dated October 20,2006. 5. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements,and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations,and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval perioci in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions,pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020,you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1st day of February 2007, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino,State of California,by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Chien,Wong NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: none ATTEST: APPROVED: � �, ; � ' � � ) j.� j 9 ` \ �_ r ��_-��-�. �,�c.. �1�.(.,L(� / . ,.�. Ciddy Wordel Cary Chien, hairperson City Planner Design Review Committee