TR-2011-67b OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
�,,
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
C U P E RT 1 N t3 (408) 777-3308 • FAX (408) 777-3333 • planninq(a�,cupertino.org
November 16, 2011
Kier & Wright
Attn: John Noori
3350 Scott Blvd, Bldg 22
Santa Clara, Ca 95054
SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT ACTION LETTER - Application TR-2011-67:
This letter confirms the decision of the Director of Community Development, given on November 16,
2011, approving a tree removal permit to allow the removal and replacement of two trees at an existing
office complex located at 18920 Forge Dr with the following conditions:
1. APPROVED PROJECT
This approval is based on the arborist report prepared by Dave Muffly (Certified Master Arborist
WE-4279B), dated October 26, 2011, consisting of 6 pages and entitled: Arborist Report-18920-18922
Forge Drive, except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution.
2. TREE REPLACEMENT
The applicant shall plant two (2) 24-inch box Chinese Elm trees on the property in accordance
with the City's Protected Tree Ordinance. The required replacement trees shall be planted within
30 days of the effective approval date of this tree removal permit.
3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of
such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby
further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If
you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of
Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
Staff has made the findings necessary to grant the tree removal permit in accordance with Section
14.18.180 of the Protected Trees Ordinance. Please note, however, that an appeal of this decision
can be made within 14 calendar days from the date of the mailing of this decision. If this
happens, you will be notified of a public hearing, which will be scheduled before the Planning
Commission and the trees cannot be removed until a final decision on the appeal has been
made. If no appeal is made within the appeal period, the tree(s) may be removed after
Wednesday, November 30, 2011.
Sincerely,
�
�---�
Simon Vuong
Assistant planner
(408) 777-1356
simonv@cupertino.org
cc: Dave Muffly, Apple, Inc.,1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, CA 95014
Prepared By:
� Dave Muffly, Apple Arborist
ISA Board-Certified Master Arborist WE-4279B
PNWISA Certified Tree Risk Assessor CTRA-500
dmuffly@apple.com 408-483-0795
In Conjunction With:
Walter Levinson, Consulting Arborist
ISA Certified Arborist WC-3172
ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401
650-697-0990
, RECEIVED
Arbor�st Re ort
p
18920-1 �922 Far e Drive �Y �
g
Introduction
At 18920 Forge Avenue, there are several locations where Apple is required by the City of Cupertino
to perForm American Disabilities Act (ADA) upgrades to entrances around the building. Existing trees
may be impacted to meet these ADA requirements at two locations. This report includes a survey of
all trees surrounding the building undergoing tenant improvements, and includes an analysis of finro
trees recommended for removal. This report is separate from a previous tree report and removal
application already submitted.
Trees #217 and #218 are sweetgums (Liquidambar styraciflua) located adjacent to parking stalls to
be demolished at 18920 Forge Drive (see Figures 1, 2& 3). The trees measure 6.1 & 6.9 inches at
4.5 feet above grade. They stand approximately 34 feet in height with a total canopy spread of 14
feet. On a scale from zero to 100% each, the subject trees rate out with a health rating of 70% and a
structural rating of 50%, for an overall condition rating of 60% or "Fair".
The trees exhibit surface rooting and "sweep root" girdling due to one of the trees being installed with
a twisting motion. Both trees reside directly behind an existing concrete walkway and retaining curb.
Due to City comments, additional ADA stalls are required to be located in front of the trees. Due to
the required depth of these stalls and the required walkway behind them, the proposed accessibility
improvements encroach the trunk lines of the trees with a new required 4'-wide sidewalk.
Based on the accessibility requirements for these stalls and their proximity to the building entrance,
this is the most feasible location for the stalls. It is because of these required improvements that we
recommend removal of these trees.
��rn pF . :.���a� �L �� 1� — •.�� l l � �� `"I
�.._�
�ws>;:>� ��i.�����uer
sre '.. r . m ....,.��.__,......._7�:.! - =1�� r-/�i..,...-� �._,..w.s.w..r.�.a�w
� '-� .... . -
�
.
:,J
� Apple Confidential - Do Not Distribute Date of Report: October 26, 2011 Page 1
�,. ,�`
. ;�
, ��,�' ;�''�:
l� : , : y�a
�
�� ~ �'� � 'N �� ��i�
�. � `,,.^ '����� fti
. .v�II� r i`"�.
�� �� � ��� � � f��� r _��
G .� � ♦ !��
i�
�,} :�.. �Y. � t.�-. a � M ���.� ,. � �. , ,
� � a' v ] iy.� �� �� 3?'`':,7•... _'ry.
i. • � . ,.r '' '�" � � ;�'t�M��`°�h ,:� � ��. � r �� �
' , �y! x x ,� i �# � '�`y.
� i . . � � .�'�- ° .
4 .L ;a ,�'. f,y �t +i.?�-t�_? �.
.» —
. c. . v s �� �k✓ma�.t,s. . r'�� 'L q. '�+�.` .. ,y ♦ � � .�ta�
♦ r `" °�-�' � "�� k � " � - ��� ��� k. �'� ? - .. �a�:
���;,: Fi , x �s�' � � x . r i -. "�._ �;?�� . . ��, -
.. ;'t�� t � t:- �.., ++±���'�'sl � e �
a
.. �,�. „� .. ,
�
, < .
� � Y.' ��'iu r � .' � S
, ;,
'�v:� �� '�. �,• � . �� F � t"
.. .
� ..,. _ , ,,:; . .: , � r,
.#
•.
. ,.�. . ..,
. ., ,, ,,.�. ., ; �
�� . � � �
,. ,.:, . � . ,# �-
� „ . ,.
,� . .
,�';� ` �: ,
. ,
.
r � ,� �
4 ' . ' ,�,
. . . . . . ��s .. . . � ...�. ,. .r.. . .. .,. . .� . ..
. �� � y w �! Y � . � : y� ' B .
` 'a t as "� � �y, se�, -�.�� F�> s � ,�'�w�� � W�� ,
f i' . , y ��'�� � �`'�` , �'� }.
^ yt x � "j° t r -�' r� �� 4 ,� �7;'t••.�3' ��1ia?,�,a Y�i "Ty � � s f 4 3 � 1 � � , '
r . � � t � � �- 2 ..�^�'�1�' { ,� �
g - �I, ' �y g .s. �..
� �+ � P 4 fF
� � ' �+ 7{ ,.��T��� - � � 1t $ k F } �' � Y P g3�` � , r P +"�t.��z'
- J3 S..>i., . �LL- ' _ ° : �,;.y � „� l c ���j46' ..F �� � }�i4 c�, `� r 2 .' s t. -r+�yn:�:�^;b �^'z F ;�` T �4:''�r ¢
J;� �„ i� 7� ,1 m . � - ! Y� � � � }��.{M - �c -� :.
3� ✓ � - i ; '4sN 'h > . �„' if"�z �'i4.:! ,51 ,�+'� ,� � d'
. J..�q � � r A �� b %, i� t� ,�u• t ... E �,# �,. . � 5 {� { a � � � �. i*s �r^'„� � r'� � i 7 ,'.
.�.� is�, � _�ti �� � � i � i: i •?s. ': . ♦ � �, � � . a �:.. 3 �. ' �S, �,;
`.: ��� .� '�� ' � ``L cw- F'`ei�e :� ,�i u���br�2.. �rt t a : �^i� .'t�, s4� � r _.: F 4 '��r� �' K r • � ��� �t
,'l� N ;�, rf Y� lC �, ''�E vk'.�5 q k 1 / t�' !s v�, '1'� .. wc .`�..`..
$ � �� � ���� r.��"' 2� 4 �,�t�j� � ti �rz'��� j��+F ��� a �,� }��K �.''<'�� a+� � e ; �'� ., �' h X ` ,^'o � ^
�� .t� y��.r��n,'.Yr:,r �} � '� _ � ��� � C�.� y �� 4�� ���r * -:: n � \` �
�r "
_ � �— .
?!`� 5*�,i .$"'f'�a�i! :J�� � 1
1 •
� • • � ,�i`�.'' A ' '� . � ��� r�
> ' -.'��.� . a.*� ! � �4` � � -w
° �m ; 4�� . � '� �,.�r�i[ '� P;. `1, ��� ;jt'� ,r a '• .► � .,r�•�, �r
" , :y. ;. : . r ' a ' , YQ,
w g+ � i � � � �'+ ��` � � �� �, � � '•,� M '
t E
.
. ,,_ J � ., `! � � �'' �
. . ,�
. .. . .
. .. � � .:
; - � :� : �. +� � y 'c
. � : � - �
' �
- ,�r • F
. � - _ ,. . �Y.' r�:1� ' ��� �.
! t
� � � � �. ,'^ r �
.M ' � 5 _...: ,, ,.
�� :� M : '�
, r 4 .. . : .r
' , � • �"',, ,�� . ' � �` f +` a � � � ...
., �
•�, i � ' .e�,., � �y "..�j-�' i
� �� ' � � ..,�� ��'.,•
Y
, .t:' ;Y.. '
� . .:. ....
. . <' ,.� ` � �4 .
' : ,. . . .';� : ".. • _
•-} x. .,.�:. ..'-.w r- -- N
t b �:- " ,� . . . . " ...`a � #'�
� � : 1" .
� k ` �
y 4��Ci' c � y* 'a r
`" '` ,:� '�.:r.� .,,'
rF �T ` ` �, * � .
a : ` �:Ai r .,�
� � � � �.. ,� �.
�;..:� :' ,N _ ia
r � '� fi � � '�'.
t �? � 3 ,
s n H' S p e. � ����t
: ` .a h ` h ' f � - 'If
tt ,.. � �� -�. � ) ZV � •! •a yw �
� � ' i�� . �yl'�
i
� '�.,w �` �, wt � �� , �n � ��i' � „� � ��, �"� '�
�.. � i �M Lu �� r k '�� +�` .
� . � ,�-
I'? Y � �i�;;az'IS' � v�^�S
�,'-, �. , ,,� �f +' "�^ �+,s
«. - r .V � =,E�, `.�,
<
s
'� -F
t ..4x �^ :j .
:�
''�,., � 1 � i a :, a.. � � .'i��� 't� ��' s .t:_� .
� � �i. � • � F� y e,,., ,. :
` .,�k >'s . "'�� �a.� �•',- r t j ,� �."K �. �' ow� "'�a �� �
q �'� ' .� +l '' t ' ;; •,' ! 1 J � ' , ` � a. t . �
��i�t . � ='�i t 1 .. � ,,.� 1 � i ., T ,
'�, C . - � �-� � � +�., .
.';�' � � � i� '� �! ' , � ` '',� �4 �
�
s y
Y �' .� y;,� . : eeM�' - ' y � y � '�^, �1 f� �+b .✓' n .. ��
.�, t" r �:..A P . ,."�. •�.<'.r.±, a''4� ei ' � a :,�".,� ':r':: � 4 �A.� `'�'a � .
� � . . . . . � ' �� � �
. ... ,. .. � . ...;. „. .
t _ : � c , . , _ j,, R
. . ... . . .v .� ,. ... .
. _ . . .. .. �. , . .: � . • . �.. �. ..
�-
i _ ... . , � '. c ...' ..�. ' � . ._ �.- ;� . '�':
� '
t '
.. . _. - ., . ..:. .. _.. . ,._.
��� �� � M��.
I � •
• •� - • •— �� • � • — �. — • �—•• � ••- . 1 '.�—
r � .
! � � i
�
� ��,,.'� #219 � � ; �„__#224 #226 #228 #229 #230
�� —#220 i � i � �#223 � � � �#227 • � •
#z1s • �#221 �#227 j � ! •
#217 Y #218 #225
� r
' � TREES TO BE REMOVED �
�#2�s� �2�a � & NEW TREE PLANTING �
#212 � �#213 #231
W •
� �#211
�
�
�� 18920-18922 FORGE DRIVE �32 I
�
�
O
�
#2, o • �#ZOS -�
#233
#208 � �#207 �
I
#206 � �#205
� �
� i
#204 �
' � ry "' � �#202 � �#201 j � f � I � � �� °� � i � 36 � 34 � 35
����� ( � � � ,
�
l...e.f ��� `t � ' ' �
�� i. �,� : —�
,, �� � � �
(2) NEW 24" BOX TREES
LEGEND
#20, Existing Tree Tag Number
_
: • Existing Tree o
`� � Existing Tree To Be Removed z
1 ""� � New Tree To Be Planted N.T.S.
k W KI ER & WRIG HT
� CIVIL ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS INC. F/GURE 3- TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN
3350 Scott Boulevard, Building 22 (408) 727 6665
�' santa c�ara, California 95054 , fax (408) 727 5641 18920-18922 FORGE DR/VE - ADA /MPROVEMENTS
Replacement Species
Several areas were considered for the location of the replacement trees for the proposed
removal of trees #217 and #218. Because the removal location has available landscaping, we
are proposing to replant two new trees in roughly the same location as those being removed.
The proposed replacement species is the semi-evergreen Chinese Elm (Ulmus parvifolia 'Drake'
or'Sempervirens'). These trees are long-proven in the Cupertino area in just this kind of setting.
The trees create a low-maintenance canopy, and thrive in areas of root confinement and limited
supplemental irrigation. This will be a small version of what you can see in the main outdoor
seating area at Stanford University's Tressider Union. Please see Figure 3 for further description
of this species. As per City of Cupertino regulations, two 24-inch box trees will be replanted as
shown in Figure 3.
_ �' P
1 � ` • II . ` t � ����� �:
1
_ � � � � ���� 3 �.-� ,� . . � yae -� . �.
� i i r . , i 4 � �; , ._�/'� �''� � J � :4 �� �r�t F,' �z.
► � ♦ 1 � • - _ f �\. R � � �. / . 4' . . . / �, �/ -r. ..'� F j , YQR �a
' -..1 � � ! �� .. r '.�,� r .
�• • s ♦ • � • � f _ _ �� ..�1��`` (� :!'�': - ,�.; � ��Y
- . -',r� �' �� ' ` �� *" > ,� � !�..
rr ,� � .w • / • • ' �1"� � 1 i 9• � �. •? • �' !�
..�,```\ . 4.� y " ��" �
.�a.. . � ,t .: 4, . � �._. � �..
• ' ► ' ♦ � � � , "�r r � 'y�.S������ '� 'i > ' . .._
y . $� � 1 .:. e , _
� • s � � � <� P �+' ° -
• �:., y�..,� � �y � , � �
_ � � �`_'<�k.. h
1 . � , w'�� .
�e. � t�.. . M'-'. :�. � t1 ��'
. �
�, � `
� � � ♦ • � � .
s. :."'�`. -��`
��.� ' �^ • i•' � .
� yr"°.. e � u �',;.
r 1 . � :; � ��'
�_ .+;�� �M f � ��
�,�, -oi��, �::�� n�z. ��
° , i y ,� 'M�' �`, - Ix _5� � � � :r. '��. � �i< ` � � � ; � �.'7.,-. ...
� A S"F� �,3" �` �� �• k � � �'' � �. �'�' - ' �,'
L �' � t � �� � r t. � tl:, �. ;�}; . � �'�� r � , '}.. ; f �.,
J K' � � 4. �"'s �Y y y i , � � .V'ti� w.� �� a
�"f '*.+s*' `��,�z � =� , �J` .�� . . - I�
� � � ���j � � � j j � �, �' ' 2 � .:{ t � �
n 4 �♦
�
..� � � � � t . 1 Y` . � '.
�,
+ r , ' •
I A � �� � �� 4 �� I ' � . {� "�M�4 .. . , '
! �. �' l �- ..e.._. ". � � .
j '� '�, r Y Ir` � ,ir 't �
f � �`, i i j` � ~ ��, � y �; "!� � !
+�a-e- ' � � � : w t Y , :' a , �-'
� s - ��;�W'
.� i "
, ,» �•
� - ' ..r•;<... � _.>: ir«:. . . � ,._..
Fig. 4 - Chinese Elms
Apple Confidential - Do Not Distribute Date of �eport: October 26, 2011 Page 4
Tree Data Table
�
� � C ^ � l
O I i � �> y � I I I
� I d � � � � �
�
N O C � � � i (C
C l � j �� c" d I � Q- '
�� m �� N N i N � C
� ' I � �
i E U� C �� t ' II E , U C L I O
� ��- ` C O. C U � � V � i
+. � C � � i �- �
� (�j C��•� C C �- '� - l i Z i U1 I ^ � (n d p
� � � � C N � � � � � C I °� .`�.� `� � \° i U \°
�
F- ` N � 3 C- f "" 0 p � N p � I y "' '� L O � O
O +.. -0 . �� !n E E � � s tC �.. � f � t�
� ��.S c� a� •� o .E co ,� E � c � � co r � a� � a?
�
� j � � ^^^ co 0 o a� 'a� a a� � >� o I
F- �Q o� �w���V �� F- U i C� = c� _° I O° Z
I I Sequoia � o Moderate TDE. S-trunk form. Soil moisture �,,
201 � � 1 26.2 26.2 coast redwood sempervirens 89 26 60/60 i 60 /o Fair deficit. Root system causing curb cracking.
Sequoia 70% Root system causing curb cracking. Moderate
202 i I 35.5 35.5 I coast redwood I�� sem ervirens 90 31 70/70 'i Good TDE.
� � P � i
I � I
I - I - �--- -- - -- ------ - -- --
! Liquidambar ' o
204 �, I 16.4 16.4 , sweetgum styraciflua 56 26 60/50 57 /o Fair Soil moisture deficit. Codominant mainstems. I
---
205 I �'I I 14.9 14.9 ' sweet um ��, Liquidambar �, o '��
, 9 � styraciflua 48 24 70/50 � 60 /o Fair
� I Liquidambar o
206 ' I 17.2 17.2 sweetgum , styraciflua II 60 26 65/40 � 55 /o Fair
207 I 13.8 13.8 sweetgum '� Liquidambar ��' S2 20 60/40 50% Fair
styraciflua
�
208 ' I 14.1 14.1 �I sweetgum , Liquidambar '� � 23 60/35 � 45% Two codominant mainstems with bark inclusion
styraciflua �, �, Poor type crotch. I�
-
Liquidambar ! � 45% �
209 �'�, I 14.9 14.9 sweetgum st raciflua I 44 28 50/40 � Poor Twig dieback in upper canopy.
Y ;
� Liquidambar � I Extensive surface rootin Roots dama ed on �
210 '� I 14.5 14.5 sweetgum � styraciflua 58 25 70/50 i 57% Fair grade due to turf mowing. g
--- ' ---
Liquidambar
211 ' I 19.1 19.1 sweetgum I 60 32 70/60 63% Fair
� styraciflua
� I I Liquidambar
212 , I 14.1 14.1 sweetgum �� styraciflua 47 28 60/50 � 55% Fair
- -- -- -
Liquidambar � 45%
213 � I 14.5 14.5 �� sweetgum 46 18 45/45 j Twig dieback noted throughout the canopy. I �
styraciflua , , Poor I
-- - - T --- - - ,
i � I I Liquidambar i 480� Extensive surface rooting. Roots damaged on ~'
214 �� I 14.1 14.1 �', sweetgum I styraciflua 54 23 55/45 '�, poor 9rade due to turf mowing. Two codominant I
� mainstems fork at 11 feet. �
215 I !� �� �, I Liquidambar I o
I 14.9 14.9 , sweetgum I� 47 27 60/50 �; 55 /o Fair ,
styrac�flua � -- ----- ----�
' �� ' o Flux noted at old pruning cut wound at 8 feet.
216 I 11.5 11.5 I sweetgum Liquidambar I 36 21 40/25 I ' 28 � Tree was top pruned. Dieback throughout ,'
� styraciflua � Poor �nopy.
I
�', Liquidambar � Surface rootin noted. Narrow codominant !
217 � X I 6.1 6.1 , sweetgum � 32 14 70/50 � 60% Fair g
; styraciflua ! mainstem fork.
�
i � Liquidambar I I Surface rooting noted. "sweep root" girdling due i,
218 X I 6.9 6.9 � sweetgum � styraciflua i 34 13 70/50 60% Fair to landscape contractors installing tree in ground �,
i I , with a twisting motion. '
I I j � Se U018 �� Moderate TDE. Appears to have soil moisture
219 � I 22.9 22.9 coast redwood 4 � 69 23 55/55 � 55% Fair deficit. Increase irrigation to improve vigor. Poor !
I i sempervirens I scaffold limb development in upper canopy. �
i
_ � - - - --+
Sequoia �' ' p i
220 I 27.1 27.1 coast redwood I �I 81 26 65/60 � 63 /o Fair Soil moisture deficit. Moderate TDE.
i , sempervirens j ;
--
Japanese I Acer I 70% Well-rooted specimen. Has soil moisture deficit. �
221 ' , I, T 1.9 1.9 maple cultivar palmatum 9 8 70/60 , Good Increase irrigation. Requires training pruning.
� ; I - �
Apple Confidential - Do Not Distribute Date of Report: October 26, 2011 Page 5
Tree Qata Table
� m
m
� a � E � � �
�q y p C � � E �
� � � � E � m � �
p� � 7� � m fA M N C
E U�c rn� t � E '� �= o
E � 2 0�� c E m a � 2 � c
xt c� c p� �- w c c — z cn -- � u� m o
� � C�d C N.Q E m«� � O °tS � °if o U o
a~i z� c ���r �� c E m E � o� m '.° L° m
� �° �•�' o .� �o E c . m m
� 'Q `o � W � ��V � � � U (� = cn 2 ° O ° z
222 T 3.8 3.8 �apanese Acer �3 13 90/70 80% Good TDE.
maple cultivar palmatum Good
0
223 I I 18.3 18.3 coast redwood sem�nri ens 51 20 80/90 Good Good TDE. Good scaffold limb development.
Japanese Acei o Marginal bum on foliage due to soil moisture
224 I, T 8.0 8.0 15 20 55/65 60 /o Fair deficit. Upper canopy twig dieback due to soil
maple cultivar pa/matum moisture deficit. Increase irrigation.
Japanese ACe� o Canker on trunk at 2 feet above grade. Soil
225 I, T 7.6 �•6 maple cultivar pa/matum 16 13 55/50 52 /o Fair moisture deficit with twig dieback. Partially
girdling roots noted.
226 I 10.7 10.7 coast redwood Sequoia 37 11 80/80 80% Minor soil moisture deficit.
sempervirens Good
Sequoia 780� Flat side on root crown on building side of trunk
227 I 10.7 10.7 coast redwood sempervirens 35 14 85/65 Good base indicates lack of buttress roots on that side.
I Minor soil moisture deficit issues.
228 I � I 29.0 29A Shamei ash Fraxinus 64 59 65/65 65% Fair I,
� uhdei
229 ( I 15.7 15.7 Shamel ash F uhdel S 46 27 45/45 Poo� Foliar anthracnose fungus infection noted.
230 I 14.5 14.5 Shamei ash Fraxinus 46 28 45/35 40% i Extensive twig dieback noted throughout canopy.
uhdei Poor ' Likely a soil moisture deficit issue.
Fraxinus 45% Extensive twig dieback noted throughout canopy.
231 1 27.5 27.5 Shamel ash uhdei 58 50 40/55 poor 'i Likely a soil moisture deficit issue.
232 I 12.2 12.2 Shamel ash Fraxinus 31 35 20/40 27% ' Tree was topped in past. Poor TDE.
uhdei Poor
233 I I 14.1 14.1 Shamel ash F�axinus 40 26 25/35 30% ' Foliar anthracnose fungus infection noted.
uhdei Poor � Extensive twig dieback throughout canopy.
234 I 19.5 19.5 Shamel ash Fraxinus 42 37 45/45 45% ; Foliar anthracnose noted. Twig dieback noted
uhdei Poor ! throughout canopy. Codominant mainstems.
235 I 19.9 19.9 Shamel ash Fraxinus 58 40 45/45 45% '�, Foliar anthrecnose noted. Twig dieback noted
uhdei Poor �� throughout canopy. Codominant mainstems.
236 i I 33.2 33.2 Shamel ash Fraxinus 59 48 45/50 45% Foliar anthracnose noted. Moderate twig dieback
uhdei Poor in sections of the canopy.
�: Apple Confidential - Do Not Distribute Date of Report: October 26, 2011 Page 6