Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC packet 10-25-2011 Table of Contents Agenda...................................2 �• draft minutes of October 11, 2011 dratf minutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2• Cell Tower installation at Rancho Deep Cliff Drive Staff Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 1. Draft Resolutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 2. Verizon Coverage Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 3. Monopine Photosimulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 4. Noise Letter Charles Salter Assoc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 5. Geotechnical Report by Beacon Geotechnical . . . . . . . . . 55 6. Geotechnical Peer Review Ltr Cotton Shires. ......... 85 7. RF Energy Analysis Hammett & Edison . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 8. Alternative Sites Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 9. Verizon TICC Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 10. Rancho Deep Cliff HOA Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 11. Mitigated Negative Declaration, ERC Recommendation, Initial Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 12. Verizon Plan Set . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 3• Collocation of antennas on a proposed Cell Tower installation at Rancho Deep Cliff Drive Staff Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 1. Draft Resolutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 2. AT&T Coverage Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 3. AT&T collocation photosimulations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 4. Noise Letter - Charles Salter Assoc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 5. RF Energy Analysis- Hammett & Edison. . . . . . . . . . . . 148 6. Alternatives Site Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 7. TICC Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 8. Rancho Deep Cliff HOA Letter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 9. AT&T Plan Set . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 4 • Director's Report Staff Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167 News Articles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 1 AGENDA C U P� FtT I�'+� C� CITY OF CUPERTINO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino Community Hall Tuesday, October 25, 2011 ORDER OF BUSINESS SALUTE TO THE FLAG: 6:45 p.m. ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Subiect: draft minutes of October 11, 2011 Recoiiunended Action: approve or deny the draft nlinutes Pa�e: 5 WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS POSTPONEMENTS/REMOVAL FROM CALENDAR ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the nieeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Conunission on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are lunited to three (3) inulutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Commission from making any decisions with respect to a matter not on the agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC HEARING 2. Subiect: Cell Tower installation at Rancho Deep Cliff Drive Reconunended Action: approve or deny ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-07, TR-2011-12, U-2011- 07, V-2011-01 (EA-2011-06) Description: Application: ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-07, TR-2011-12, U-2011-07, V-2011-01 (EA-2011-06) Applicant: Chip Griffin, Ridge Conununications (Verizon Wireless) Location: near 22475 Rancllo Deep Cliff Dr (Rancho Deep Cliff HOA) APN# 356-02-999 Architectural & Site approval for a new personal wireless service facility consisting of six panel anteiulas mounted on a collocatable 70 foot tall monopine and an associated equipinent enclosure at a P1aiuled Residential Development (Rancho Deep Cliffl; Height Exception to allow the antennas of a new personal wireless service facility to be mounted at a height of 64 feet where 55 feet is allowed; 2 Tuesday, October 25, 2011 Tree Removal Perinit to allow the removal and replaceinents of one, 45" diameter Monterey Pine tree and two Chinese Pistaclles to facilitate the construction of a personal wireless service facility; Use Permit to replace an existing television lattice tower witll a new personal wireless service facility consisting of six panel anteiulas mounted on a collocatable 70 foot monopine and an associated equipment enclosure at a Plaiuled Residential Development; Variance to allow a personal wireless service facility mast to be setbacl< 8 feet from an abutting residential property where 75 feet is required Pln�itiit�g Conimissiot� decisioti fir�al ur�less n�pealec� Pa�e: 26 3. Subject: Cell Tower installation at Rancho Deep Cliff Drive Reconunended Action: approve or deny ASA-2011-18, TR-2011-65, U-2011-02 and V- 2011-02 Description: Application: ASA-2011-18, TR-2011-65, U-2011-02 and V-2011-02 Applicant: Vallerie Tallerico, Trillium (AT&T) Location: near 22475 Ranco Deep Cliff Dr (Ranco Deep Cliff HOA) APN# 356-02-999 Architectural & Site Approval for a new personal wireless service facility consisting of 12 panel anteiulas mounted on a 70-foot monopine and an associated equipinent enclosure in the common area of a Planned Residential Development; Tree Removal Perinit to allow the removal and replacement of one 26" diaineter Monterey Pine to facilitate the construction of a personal wireless facility; Use perinit to allow a personal wireless facility consisting of 12 panel antennas mounted on a 70 foot nlonopine and an associated equipment enclosure in the common area of a P1aiuled Residential Development; Variance to allow equipment cabinets to be setback less than 3 feet from a side yard property line Plnti��i�ig Coi�if�rissio�i decisioti firi«1 i�riless c�p�e«led Pa�e: 124 OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Environmental Review Committee Housing Commission Mayor's Monthly Meeting with Commissioners Economic Development Committee Meeting 3 Tuesday, October 25, 2011 REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4. Subiect: Director's Report Recommended Action: accept report Pa�e: 167 ADJOURNMENT If you challer�ge the actzon of the Pla�rs�ing Comnzissior� is� cou��t, yo7r r�zcry be Iir�zitec�'to �•aising or�lv thos�e iss�zres vo�r or s�orrreor�e els�e rais�ed at the pzrblic hearif�g described if� this� agenda, o� ir� ���rittef� co�t•espondence delivet•ed to tlze C�ity of C'�rpertii�o crt, ot•�t•io� to, the plrblic lreariszg. Pleas�e s�ote that Pla�rr�i�rg C�onzn2iss�ior� policy is to allo�v a�r a�plica�rt aj�zd �ozr�s� to s�eak fo�• 10 n�ir��rtes� arzd i�rdivid�rals to speak fot• 3 n�ijz�rtes�. In conlpliance with the Ainericans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the City of Cupertino will inake reasonable efforts to acconuilodate persons with qualified disabilities. If you require special assistance, please contact the city clerk's office at 408-777-3223 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Materials related to an item on t11is agenda submitted to tlie Planning Departrnent after distribution of the agenda pacl<et are available for public inspection in the Plaiuling Departrnent located at 10300 Torre Avenue, during normal business hours. For questions on any items in the agenda, or for docuinents related to any of the items on the agenda, contact the P1aiuling Deparhilent at (408) 777-3308 or plaiuling@cupertino.org. 4 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 CITY OF CUPERTINO PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT MINUTES 6:4> P.M. October 1 L 2011 TUESDAY CUPERTINO COMMUNITY HALL The regular Planning Coininission ineeting of October 11, 20ll �vas called to order at 6:4� p.in. in the Cupertino Coinmunit�- Hall, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA., b�- Chair Winnie Lee. SALUTE TO THE FLAG ROLL CALL Coininissioners present: Chairperson: Winnie Lee Vice Chaiiperson: Mart�T Miller Coininissioner: P1u1 Broph�- Coininissioner: Clinton Bro��-i�le�r Coinlnissioner: Don Sun Staff present: Coinmunit�- Development Director: Aarti Shrivastava Cit�- Planner: Gai�� Chao Seiuor Pla�iner: Colin Jung Assistant Plaiiner: George Schroeder Assistant Planner: Siinon Vuong Cit�- Attorneti Valerie Ai7nento APPROVAL OF MINUTES l. Minutes of Septe�zber 27, 20I1 Plunning Commission �zeeting: MOTION: Motion by Com. Sun, second by Com. Brownley, and unanimously carried 5-0-0 to approve the Sept. 27, 2011 Planning Commission minutes as presented. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None POSTPONEMENTS/REMOVAL FROM CALENDAR None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS CONSENT CALENDAR None PUBLIC HEARING 2. ASA-2011-17, TR-2011-48 Architectural and Site Approval to ainend a prior lpproval Jeff Oparowswki (Sobrato (ASA-2009-08) to malce ininor changes to architecture, Organization) parlcing lot l���out aud landscaping at an eiisting shopping Location: SW Corner of center (former PW Marlcet Site); Tree Reinoval perinit to No. DeAnza Boulevard & a prior approv�l (TR-2010-08) in conjunction �vith ne�v Homestead Rd minor changes to the parl�ing lot lay-out and landscaping 1t 5 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll an eiisting shoppi�ig center. Post�oned fi�orn Se�tember 27, 2011 Plan�i�rg C'ommission meeting; Plav�ning C'ommissio�r decision,fi�al unless appealed. Gary Chao, City Planner, presented the staff report: • Revie��-ed the application for an ainendinent to a prior approved architechiral and site application allo«ing changes to the site and architecture, in acldition to a landscaping plan relating to replacement trees as part of the original tree removal application. • He revie«ed the background of the �pplic�tion dating back to Ma�- 2010 �vhen the Cit�- Col�ncil approved the demolition of 95,666 square feet of eiistin� coininercial center and the consti�uction of 146,458 square feet of ne�� coininercial space at the fonner P.W. Supermarlcet location at North DeAnza Blvd. and Homestead Road. Sobrato acql�ired the propert�- ui November 2010; in JuI�T 2011 a Director's ininor inodification �vas approved for a 863 square foot of inezzanine storlge/mechanical lrea addition to the Rite Aid building. The ci�irent applicant is requesting to modifi- the previous approved site and architecture to accominodate the ne��� �nchoring tenant. • He revie« ed the site pl�n, architectural enha�iceinents, elevations, parlcing, building height, lrchitecture and landscape details and environinental �ssessinent as outlined in the staff report. • Staff recommends that the Planning Commission lpprove the application. There ��ere no questions presented to the applicant. Chair Lee opened the public helring. Jennifer Griffin, Rancho Rinconada resident: • Said she hoped that ��ith the recoininendations for improvement the center �tiould become a vital center again. Said she «as a��-are that ma�i�T changes have been made to the street frontage along Hoinestead Road and aslced if there «�ere an�- changes to the trees that ���ill be planted along Homestead Road and also �vhat l�ind of side�vall� lrrangement is being made froin the coiner of the propert�- over to the ne��� parlc, across Franco Drive. She noted that it ��as a vei tight road��-av and �vas optimistic that tl�ere ��ould be a safe pedestrian «all�� Chair Lee closed the public hearing. Motion: Motion by Vice Chair Miller, second by Com. Brophy, and unanimously carried 5-0-0 to approve Application ASA-2011-17, TR-20ll-48 per the model resolution. Gary Chao: • Said that relative to the landscaping alon� Hoinestead Road, it not being chan�ed: the intent �� hich ���as originall�- conditioned, ���as for Homestead to match the ne�� er portion or sections of Homestead ���ith a detached side�vallc and double ro« s of trees. �vhich is reflected on the site plan. With respect to the coimection from the coiner to the park, Condition No. 22 addresses that; the applicant is required to ��ork ��ith Public Works to provide unprovements for a pedestrian «allc��a�- and that ��-il1 be detailed out prior to the final occupa�ic�- of the project. There are no chasiges to the entrances to the drive« a�-s of the center. 3. MCA-2011-01, GPA-2011-01, Conditional Use Permit to allo�ti church uses in t�vo Z-2011-01, U-2011-01, buildings; General Plan Land Use Map Ainendinent to EXG2011-01 (EA-2011-02) change the land use designation from "Quasi-Public/ Kevin Chang, Architect Institutional" to ``Industrial/Residential/Cominercial (Home of Christ Church) 10340 Bubb Rd.; Parlung Ezception for shared parking 6 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll 10340 & 10420 Bubb Rd. bet�tieen 10340 and 10420 Bubb Rd.; Re-Zone approi. 1.8 acres from BQ (Quasi-Public building) to ML-rc (West Valle�- Light Industrial) located at 10340 Bubb Rd. Municipal Code Ainendinent to codif�r and update the West Valle}- Industrial Park Zoning regulations into the ML (Light Industrial) Zonin� Ordinance. Post�oned from the SeptembeN 27, 2011 Plan�ivrg C'ommission meeting Tentative C'ity C'ozmcil date: Octobe� 18, 2011 Colin Jung, Senior Planner, presented the staff report: • Revie��-ed the three-part application for conditional use permit, General Plan land use map ainendinent. parlcing ezception for shared parl�ing, and Muiucipal Code Ainendinent related to the Home of Christ Church, as outlined in the staff report. He revie�ved the po�verpoint presentation including suminaries of the conditional lise permit, parl�ing e�ception, Municipal Code Ainendinent, envirorunental anal�-sis, a�id noticing �nd public coinments. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the Cit�- Council 1 Negative Declaration for the project and approval of the General Plan Ainendment, Municipal Code Ainendinent, zoning, i�se pennit aud parlung ezception per the draft resolutions. Com. Brophy: • Disclosed that about 2�-ears ago he inet ��-ith representatives of the chtuch and vie���ed their flcilities before the�T had a proposal before the Plaiming Coininission. Com. Brownley: • Relative to the General Plan amendinent, he suinmarized his understanduig of the different aspects, including proposal to chasige froin quasi-public to industrial/residentiaUcoininercial. He stated that it appeared that quasi-pi�blic institution�l might be the appropriate classific�tion for this t�-pe of entit� and he aslced for clarification on the reason for chasige: ��-as it just for consistencv «ith the overall area or does it also fit in for some reason; and ��-ere there an�T other eiainples throughout the cit�- �vhere this t�pe of organization fits in the other General Plan categories. Aarti Shrivastava: • Said the �oal «as to have consistenc�-, and to give the cui7ent asid future o��mers fleiibilitv ��ith the abilit�- to use the zoning. They ���ere lble to do that ��-ith requiring a conditional use pei7nit for the asseinbl�- use under that current zoning and ��-ere 11so able to ineet both those requirements. There are some situations «ith assembl�T uses �vith miied use zoning. • Said the buildings presentl�- are built to the ML use, it ��ill allo�� the resale of this to an ML use or to a�i asseinbl�- use; it lceeps fleiibilit� «hich is ��-hat the current o��-ners ��-ere seelcing. • Defined '`sensitive receptors" as sedentai popl�lations or �-ol�ng populations ��-ho are not able to take care of themselves ui asi emergenc�-. • Said the�- limited those «�ith the original use pei7nit 1� �-ears ago because a number of the industrial uses lround it «�ere concei7ied; it has been e�tended to the other site as �vell and is in the ordinance Com. Brophy: • Said it ��as not clear �vhether the buildin�s on Bl�bb Road ��ere an�� longer being used for industrial puiposes; as seen ��ith Measurei, the current o«�ner aslced to tear do��n the industrial buildings �uid replace thein «ith off�ice bi�ildings. Rel�tive to the buildiugs to the south, if the�� are to be industrial buildings �� ith hazardous chemicals, he said �vhen driving do��n McClellan at 8:30 or 9 o'clocic he sa�ti dozens of sensitive receptors coini�ig out of the apartinent coinplei lcross McClellan. and �vas curious ��-h�- that is acceptable but having a da�-care center is not acceptable. 7 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll Aarti Shrivastava, Director of Community Development: • The difference is �vhen the children a�id parents are ���allang out, there is a parent responsible for their child; at a convalescent care or da� care �-ou have a fe«- �clults in charge of a large group of l�ids; so that is an issue. There are state la�� s that li�nit the abilit�- to maintain an�� sort of hazardous cheinicals if �-ou are «ithin a certain distance from the sensitive receptors. • There are some R&D uses such as ne�� clean tech coinpa�ues that do use haza�dol�s cheinicals in soine quantitv; and these are the onlv areas a�ailable in the cit�- for thein to locate and the�- �vould be iinpacted if there ��ere such uses. Com. Sun: • Aslced if there ��ere potential dangers fi the cheinicals, either eiplosion or leaks. Colin Jung: • Said presentl�- no potential dangers ezisted; the environinental analyst �vho prepared tlus surveyed hlz�rdous inaterial users, and even though there are i�sers of hazardous inaterills there, the� are not of a tosic variet� the�- are small quantities of rea11�- standard significance, nothing that �vlrrants ���hat the st�lte ���ould require as far as rislc manageinent planning. and on1�- applies to soine vei�- sinall scope of acutel�- hazardous materials. That is not to sa� that at some fi�ture date such a use ma�� or inav not �� ant to locate at this location; that is �vhat the industiial property o«ners are loolcing to��-ard, not on1�- their current tenants, but ��hat fiiture tenants inight bring into the buildings. Chair Lee: • Said she met �tiith the applicants and Vice Chair Miller together for a presentation of their plans about a�rear and a half ago. She said that the revised orduiance sa�-s the ani�nal clinics are a permitted use; and she aslced if it ��-ould be considered a sensitive receptor? Aarti Shrivastava: • Said it �vas not; the list received �vas fi a non-codified list that this area has been rel��ing on since 1964; it ��as moved from a resolution into the ordinance. The intent �vas not to malce s«eepinb changes to the zone, but to give thein ��hat the�� a1��a��s had. Ash Pirayou, Land Use Attorney, Rattan and Tucker, Palo Alto, appearing on behalf of Home of Christ Church. • Said that over the p�st 18 inonths the church and the Planning staff h�ve ��-orlced cooperativel�- and creativel�- to establish a�vin for the cit�-, for the church and the residents; and the� haVe addressed man�T of the concems relating to the operltions of the church use and the industrial lrea b�- virtue of the conditions of the CUP. The�- have discussed the various conditions, inal�ing sure that bet�veen thein and the cit�- there is coinplete understanding as to the church's operations. Said it has not and never ��i11 be the church's goals to operate an�- t�-pe of da��care or other uses «ith `'sensiti�e receptors" at the propert�- • He said theti- �vent to great lengths in «orl�ing �vith staff, and Eihibit A of the conditional use pennit outlines the church's intended uses. time of those uses, and «-h1t prograins that «-i11 occur at the church. There is 1 comprehensive list of church activities �uid it does not include an�T uses of sensitive receptors. • Relative to the iininediate neighbors, said t11ev have talcen great strides in conjunction ���ith the staff to malce sl�re the�- have a parlciiig plan that «orlcs for both short tei7n a�id long term. • He requested that the Plannuig Coinlnission support the staff recominendation to approve the application. 8 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll Jackie Nguyen, Home of Christ Church: • Revie�� ed the church bacicground �vhich «�as established 16 �-ears ago. Said the�- ���orlced out an agreeinent ���ith neighboring companies to use the chtuch parlcing spaces during the ���eelc 1nd in tuin the church uses theirs on the «eel�end. He noted that the church is ven' active in the coininunit�r, includi�ig free car ��-ashes for the neibhborhood, being a voting site for man�r }�ears, blood drives, helps organize and hold Easter egg hunt at Memorial Parlc �vith other churches; and seives neighbors ���ith caring and enrichinent pro�rains. The church also offers training seininars for the coinmunitv 1nd participates in �vorld ��-ide relief efforts. • He asked the Commission for support of the application. Aarti Shrivastava: • Clarified that children attending church ��ith their parents a�e not considered "sensitive receptors". Chair Lee opened the public hearing. There was no one �vho �vished to spealc; the public hearing �vas closed. Vice Chair Miller: • Said he has visited the church, 1nd �<<�s pleased that the�- �iere persistent in moving fon�-ard to get the approval to be able to eipand their facilities. He added that it �z-as clear tliat the church ��as a vital pa� of the Cupertino cominuiut�-. Com. Brophy: • Eipressed concei7i about the continued ezistence of the ML zone ���hich he felt should not still eiist given the real estate prices in Cupertino; and he felt there �vas no re�son «h�- the Bubb Road cori7dor should be an�r different that the other office districts in Cupertino. • Said he «as bothered by the concept that the�- need to prohibit things like da�-care centers or after school classes; those seein to be cored to a great nuinber of religious institutions and to the eitent that the�- are requiring the restriction as a condition of approval is a concern. • He said it �vas troubling that this area is heavil�T cro«ded «ith other children and to soineho�z- sa�� children in an after school prograin �vho are not ��-ith the teachers are ``sensitive receptors" but children �vho are alone in the apartments across the street �vhile their parents �� orlc are of no concern in evaluatuig �tihat sort of cheinicals should be kept in t1�e buildings north of McClellan. • Said he «ould support the application and proposed resolution, but hoped that at soine future tiine the�- could reopen it and update the ordinance to reflect tlie realities of Cupertino as it is and not as it ��-as 40 ��eais ago. Com. Brownley: • Echoed Com. Broph�r's coinments a�id slid he ��-ould sl�pport evei�-thing as ��-ritten. Said it lppeared to be a superb project, but «ould be ideal if the Generll Plan and zoning �iould be consistent �vith the t�pe of organization and the uses that the�- «ould like to go on �vitlun that t�Tpe of zoned property�. He said it �vould be ideal ui the futl�re if they could ��-orlc on gettuig that to fit properl�-. In this case it sounds lilce a great collaboration has gone on beri�een the cit�- and the organization and he loolced fon� to continuing that relationship. Com. Sun: • Said he supported the project, and felt it «-as iinportant for this t�pe of organization i�i the cominunit�- to bring all the people together. He said it ��-as a responsibility of the Cominission to treat each one fairlti- regarding the la�v and to ensure that each case applies to evei He said he supported the project. 9 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll Chair Lee: • Said she felt it ���as iinportant to lceep the industrial part industrial and lceep a place for the cit�- to hlve the perinitted uses. Ideallv it is not a peifect location for a church in the industrial park; the church is a vital part of the communit�r and a great de11 of creativit�- and cooperltion had to occur; because the applicant is oka�r ��ith the sensitive receptors clause, she said she ��-ould support it. • Said the role of the Plai�.n.i.ng Commission includes malciiig recominendations on land l�se issues and mal�ing plans and loolcing at each part of the citv «here the uses need to go iu and that is �vhat they are doing. There �vere no neighbors sho�ving opposition to the project eicept for one email received and staff and the neighbor �tiere able to talce into account the concern raised that there be no sensitive receptors or an�- other daycare facilities or convalescent hoines there. Motion: Motion by Vice Chair Miller, second by Com. Brophy, and unanimously carried 5-0-0 to approve Application GPA-2011-01, MCA-2011-01,m Z-2011-01,m U- 2011-01, EXG2011-01 (EA-2011-02) per the model resolution. 4. M-2011-06, TM-2005-OS Amendinent to an approved 3 lot Tentative Parcel Map Frank Sun to modif� development restrictions to reflect cl�rrent Rl- 21989 Lindy Lane Zoning de�elopment standards. Tentative C'iry C'ozrncil c�ate: Nove�rrbeN 1 �, 2011 Colin Jung, Senior Planner, presented the staff report: • Revie��ed the application for an amendinent to an approved 3-lot tentative parcel inap to inodifvi certain developinent restrictions to reflect current R-1 zoning developinent standa�ds on 21989 Lind�- Lane, as outlined in the staff report. He noted that presentl� there are no lctive developinent applications on file for building on the project site. • Revie��-ed the area vie�v of the propert�-, approved tentative inap and tuneline and gave an overvie�ti of the background of the application. In 200� the Planning Coinmission approved the tentative parcel map; approval ��as appealed b�- some neighbors and the Cit�- Council denied the appeal but added more conditions to the tentative map. li1 2007 Cit�- Council adopted ne�v hillside zoning standards for 18 sloped R1 lots in the North Lind�r Lane area and in 2011 the Council further ainended the Rl ordinance to include standards for 1ll R1 lots �vith slopes of 20% or greater, modifi-ing the regulations in place and eitending them to all R1 zoned properties �� ith slopes 20% or inore. As a result of changes to the R1 zoning ordin�nce, the applicant is requesting deletions of Conditions Nos. 2 and 8 for his properties to be inore consistent «ith the other R1 zoned sui properties. • Staff recominends that the Planning Coininission recoininend the ainendinent for approval to confoiin the developinent regl�lations deleting Conditions 2 and 8 to the Rl zonuig orduiance. • Staff ans�vered Coininissioners' ql�estions rega��ding the project. Frank Sun, Applicant: • Eipressed concern about dispa�ities �vith his lots and the neighbors' lots and said that a fe��� �-ears ago he subdivided 2.7 acres into 3 lots; his adjacent neibhbor and t«o neighbors coinbined 2.�0 acres, and are subdividing into 5 lots; the�T spent a fe�� ��-eelcs and he has spent 3�-ears. The geological study is not required for subdivision; ho��ever, the previous o«7ier of his propertv did one stud�T, and he repeated four tiines. He leained that his neit door neighbor used his geological studv, and fuiished his subdivision in a shorter period of time. He felt something �� as not right and �vent to the Planning Cominission and Cit�- Council and subdivided his parcel into three lots and agreed not to further subdivide. Conditions ��-ere placed on his applicltion, �uid the adjacent neighbors' ne�ti1�- created lots do not hlve those restrictions. He eipressed concern that tlie la�v has changed several tiines and seeins inore 10 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll relaied: he is the oiil�- one still cari the le�ac5 of the 1�% overla�-, and �vants to be treated lilce the others and follo��- the same la���. • Relative to the potential size. for all three lots inore th�n half of the lots �vere greater than 30% «ith greater than 30% slope. As �-ou kno��- �-ou cannot touch those areas; there is no possibilit�r of an�T buildinb. After the slope easeinent and setbacic the ne« la�� had a inore restrictive setback; the actual size of the potential buildings ��-ill be quite limited. • He said he «-as not seelciiig a builduig peiinit becal�se he did not uitend to do an�,-thing «ithin a short period of tiine and ��ill lceep the propert�- for 10 to 20 vears. He reiterated that for inanti- �ears they �vere subject to different regi�lations �uid ��-anted to be subject to eqi�al treatinent relative to his propert�-. Chair Lee opened the public hea�ing. Mehmet Taysi, Cupertino resident: • Resides across from Dr. Si�n's propert�� on south side of Lind�- L1ne since 1978. Said he �vas confused of �tihat the real la�� s�vere aiid ���h�- the�-lceep changing each �-ear; at one tiine Nos. 2 and 8�� ere good for the comml�nit�- and no��- the�T are not good enough. He agreed �� ith Dr. Sun and aslced for an e�planation of the constant changes. Gary Chao, City Planner: • Eiplained that originally the Rl ordinance had very fe��- provisions regarding goveinin� properties on hillsides; there «�as onl�T tolcen inention if �-ou eiceed 30%, then �-ou have to go through an e�ception process. Over the �Tea�s because there �vas soine developinent in this 1rea, and soine «ere of concern to soine neighbors, that is �vh�- the Cit� Council several tiines has attempted to adjust the rules so it is just ribht for that area. • Said the initial onset of the first atteinpt did not coinpletel�- capture the interest of the propert�� o��-ners in that a�ea as «e11 as the eipected outcoine of the n�les: �vhich is the reason for the inore recent change «�hich instead of focusing just on fe��� parcels ���ithin the a�ea, the Cit�- Coi�ncil decided if the�- �vere going to do this, it should be loolced at coinprehensivel��. There are man� hillside properties in the R1 throl�ghout the city of Cupertino, not just focusing this area. Recentl�-, the Council atteinpted to malce it a coinprehensive effort and standardized soine of the n�les that are �ood for all Rl hillside pa��cels over 20% as it relates to developinent standards. so that there is inore of a consistenc�r and conforinit�- to a«�a�- of revie�ving, and �lso propertti- o��-ners applying those iules to theu developinents. • Said it �vas a sunplified wa�� in looking at the relson for the ch�uiges and it is consistent �vith the applicant's request and no�ti the rules app1�- to practicall�- all R1 lots �vith over 20% slope. this being one of them and his 1djlcent nei�hbors bein� the others; �vh�r not be consistent ���ith evei that is the intent of the recent change. That is ��-h�- the applic�uit is asking for consistenc�-. • The n�les originall�- unposed on the propert�T toolc place �vhen there �vas no unifoi7n ��a�- of appl� standards that didn't eiist ��hich is the reason «hv the Council came up ��-ith those things at the tiine, thii�lcing it «as reasonable. No«� thev have iinpleinented the iules, the baseline rules shot�ld app1�-. Candan Taysi, Cupertino resident: • Said the�r had seen all the chan�es that have occui7ed and had been to the Commission man�- tiines; in 200� the�- put an earnest effort foi�vard �vitli the neighbors and thought some rules ��-ere set. The�T thought at the tiine Dr. Sun had proinised and it ��-as approved that he could build a house on No. 1 lot «ith the provision that it �vould not eiceed 3,000 square feet. The�- lgreed and peace �vas made; but three �-ears later the�- received a letter �� another change. She aslced �tihen the changes �vol�ld stop. • She said at one tiine the area ���as a beal�tifi�l area, but big hoines ha�e been pei7nitted; and the area is not conducive to big hoines. Said she did not understand ho« inanv inore tiines t1�e�� 11 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll ���ould haVe to come to the Commission and see homes up to 10,000 square feet built. As an old timer, she said she has seen the hill come do���n and built up again a�id the protection «-a11 that «as built. When the huge hoines 1re built, there ��i11 be a inljor fllttening and disturbance of the earth. • She asked that the Commission consider those issues before maldng a decision. Wagviit Ishak, Cupertino resident: • Resides on the property acljacent to Dr. Sun and said he did not understand GarS- Chao's eipl�uiation. He slid he concurred �vith the previous speal�er's coininents; and could not iinagine ho�� one col�ld build a house on Lot No. 3 because of the slope. He eipressed concern that it �vould affect his propert�- because it is a steep hill. • He said he supported Dr. Sun ��hen he first caine 4�-ears ago and the agreeinent ��-ith hiin ��as that he ��-ould build a fence right a��a�T bet��-een their properties and that has not occui7ed. He said he �vanted a fence bet�veen the t�� o properties. Asked for an e�plaiiation of ho�v to build a house inore than 6,000 square feet on Lot no. 3. Aarti Shrivastava: • Said Colin Jung ���as discussing a theoretical nuinber based on 4�% of the lot size; ��-hat the�- can actu�ll�- build «i11 depend on ho��- inuch gracling they- can do. it «-ould have to go to geotechiucal revie��-. Staff ��i11 address the visual unpacts: the hoines «i11 need design revie« above a certain size and the neighbors «ill be noticed as pa� of the process. Staff feels all those hoines ���ill be safe because theti- «�ill be engineered to ineet all structural requirements. Colin Jung: • Relative to size of hoines that could be built, he said that the inore mone� a propert�- o�� ner has available to spend on a hoine, the bigger the house can be, despite an5r ph5rsical barrier; inone�� tends to solve a lot of constraints. Gaiy Chao: • Said there is not a inaziini�in on the cut and fill; if it ezceeds a certain linount it involves grading peiinits and revie�tis. He said that not all three lots are entirel�- flat: there are sections that are steeper than the others and usuall�r «�hen the site is assessed, the natural pad ��ould be at the flattest portion and that in itself ina�� or ina�- not facilitate a house up��-ards of 10,000 square feet. Staff «ould potentiall�- have concerns if �-ou start building off the side of the lull or do soine major retaining �valls that �vould have issues themselves. In addition, there is tree reinoval, �-ou don't ��ant to clear cl�t a�i entire lot just to facilitate a large house. There are liinitations that one �vould hlve to adhere to that naturall�- inalce the home smaller, but there 1re rather large size homes in the area. • The realit�- is there are 20,000 to 30,000 squlre foot lots neit to 10,000 square foot lots so naturall�- there «ill be a disparity; the larger the lot, the larger the home �-ou can build. People ��-eigh that in «hen the�- pl�rchase properties. Lilce«ise the line has to be dra«n some«here: this is a unique area in that this is a beginning of that larger area and there are large hoines in the 1re1 �s ��-e11 as smaller homes do«-n belo���; it is a transitionll area. Aarti Shrivastava: • Responding to a question if there is a restriction on the asnount of cut and fill that can be done, she said the�- increased the level of revie« ��ith the restriction; the�- do not sa�- "�Tou camiot do inore than this" but state "if �-ou do inore than this, then the level of revie��� increases." She said that staff ��, ill studti- the ordinauce. 12 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll Gaiy Chao: • Said if 2,500 cubic �-ards is eiceeded, it needs Planiung Coininission revie���. If the FAR is over 35% it requires staff level revie��-; if combined, both ���ould go to the Planning Coimnission. Vice Chair Miller: • Said the point of the application is to malce their propert}T consistent ��-ith ho« all the others are treated. In terins of soine of the concerns of neighbois about the potential size of the house, it loolcs like there is enough regulation in place th�t if there �vas going to be a large house it ���ould have to coine for further revie�� and in a public heari�ig. Aarti Shrivastava: • Said the�- recentl�r �vent through a policy- revie«- of sloped lots and believe that is �tih1t the Planning Commission and Cit�- Council intended for tliose properties. Com. Brownley: • Echoed Vice Chair Millei's final coininents and said there «-ere iinportant considerations brought l�p in the ineeting tod��- and the�- ���ill be unportant for 1 different phase of the discussion. The purpose of toda�-'s discussion is to tallc about building designations and to make those designations consistent throughout lilce properties as requested b�r Citv Council. Motion: Motion by Com. Brownley, second by Com. Sun, and unanimously carried 5-0-0 to approve Application M-2011-06 to recommend modification of development restrictions to reflect current Rl zoning development standards. 5. ASA-2011-15, M-2011-07 Architectural and Site Approval for parlung lot, lighting Cindy Cheng (Cupertino and landscaping iinprovements at an ezisting Investment Partners) coimnercial propert� ; Modification of a previousl�� 19875/19885 Stevens Creek approved Use Pennit (U-2009-09) to allo�ti chan�es Boulevard. to the site and developinent plans. Plcrnning C'ommissio� decision fi�al unless appealed. George Schroeder, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report: • Revie��-ed the application for parlung lot inodific�tion proposal for the CORT Furnih�re 1nd I�iddie Acadein�- site on Stevens Creelt Bol�levard as ol�tlined in the staff report. In June 2010 Citv Council approved a use pei7nit to allo�v Kiddie Acadein�- to operate the da�Tcare facilit�- in the ezisting building. The use pei7nit also included rear parlcing lot iinproveinents, including installation of a ne�� outdoor pla�r area, t�vo rear reciprocal drive�� a�r access easements onto the adjacent office properties, an eitension of the rea� sound ��all and landscaping, lighting and rash enclosure iinproveinents. Kiddie Academ�T is no�v in full operation. • The applicant is requesting modifications to the rear parl�ing lot to accommodate the future CORT fuiniture tenants. The inodifications are necessai to allo��� for adequate inaneuvering space for the tractor trailer delivei tn�cics. Also requested are minor modifications to the rear of the building, relocation and replanting of trees, landscapinb and lighting standards and a ne�� trash enclosure. • He revie��ed parlcing, circulation, queuin� and safet}-, and noise levels. Other ke�- conditions include a constn�ction management plan being required prior to issuance of building pei7nits; offsetting of construction hoi�rs in conjunction ��ith the Kiddie Academ�- outdoor plav area times. Details are outlined in the attached staff report. • Staff recominends approval of the use perinit modification and architectural and site approval in accordance ��-ith the draft resolutions. • Staff ans���ered questions about li�hting, h enclostue, and parlcing. 13 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll Erik Schoennauer, representing property owner and CORT furniture: • Th�nlced citv staff for their time and effort in the revie«- of the application; conctured ��-ith their recominendation and lslced for support of the pei7nit �vith the conditions of approval as recoininended bv staff. • He said the�- ��ere follo��ing up on last �-ear's approval of the use permit to allo��� the da�r care facilit�- ui the builduig; it «as the desire of the cit�- that the applicant do «hatever is feasible to make the remainder of their building as viable as possible for retail coininercial use as part of the Heart of the Cit�- plan. The parlung needs to be reconfigured to attract a viable retailer into the space. The proposed parlcing la�-out is far superior to �tihat �� as designed last �-ear as it provides for better circulation and also provides a se�nented pa�l�ing lot for the t��o uses. • Regardi�ig Coininissioners' questions about eiisting iinpleinentation of the construction on site, the ribbon cutting for the da�-care center occui7ed about a«eelc ago. If an�- lightin� fii are not installed properl�- and do not meet cit�� code, it «�ill be rectified. Regarding the wall, they «ill investig�te �vhat the approval stated as they believe the�- �vere consistent �vith the approvaL The purpose of the �vall ��-as for acolistical reasons to protect the rear �-ards of those hoines. Relative to the trash enclosure. the three goals incll�ded havin� it as close to the building as possible to malce it eas�- for the emplo�-ees to bring the trash out; eas�-lccessibilitv for the ti�ucic picking the trash up; and lceeping it a�� a�- froin propert�r li�ies so that their trash is not placed nea� propert�-lines. The truck tl�rning raclii has been anal� zed b�T Fehr & Peers and the parlcing lot as designed «orlcs fine for the tiucics entering and leaving the site. With regard to safet�- inirror, it is 1 feasible option should it be �vai7anted b�T the traffic consultant and staff. • He said thev appreciated the support for the use pei7nit ��-ith conditions as recoininended b�- staf£ Said he «ould return if needed to respond to an�- public input. • lii response to Vice Chair Miller's question about the �vall, he said that the�- rebuilt the ��-all and applied a inasoniy coating to tl�eir side of the «-a11 in order to coinply «ith the specifications needed for the acoustical standards. He ��-as not a«a�e of a�i�T discussions ��-ith residents about the other side of the ���all. Cindy Cheng, Property Owner: • Eiplained that at the ti�ne staff recominended the noise bai�rier, the�- pl�t up a�� a11 to fuush their end; it ��as not requested to go to the other side and put a finish on the other side. Said she ��-ould consider finish on the other side if requested. Erik Schoennauer: • Said they �vould investigate the lighting: it �vas approved as part of the previous perinit and the�- inlist implement ��hat ��as approved a�id compl�- to the cit�- polic�- to fu11�- shield the lights. He said the�- «-ould revie��� the lightin� and if it is too bright or shining in the �� rong direction. the�- �iould rectifv it. Chair Lee opened the public hea�ing. Tom Huganin, Cupertino resident: • Said thev h1Ve resided behind the propert�r since 1969 and a major concern is th�t the cui7ent lighting violates the ordin�uice «hich states that the light cannot shine on the neighboi's propert�-. The light escapes off the propert�-, the ��rong fiitures are used and thev have �00 ��-att bulbs, ��-hich results in 2�00 «atts of eitra lighting on the propert�T ��-ith no cutoff shields. He said the light actuall�- malces it all the «a�- across Wheaton Drive onto his neighbor's propert�- across the street. He said the�- also have concerns lbout the t�ash enclosure location, the unfnushed �� a11, and the traffic speeding on the access roacl. He said the�- �vould prefer that the rash area be as far a��a�� fi the propert5r line as possible. 14 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll • Said he «orked on the Heart of the City plan �� the Cit�� Council and the delineation bet���een properties ���as a precast concrete �� a11; as part of the application the Planning Commission granted an eiception to put in 1 cinderblock �� and raise the height to reduce costs; the precast concrete «a11 ��-ould be finished on both sides but the cinderblock «-a11 �vould not. Because of the saviugs ��ith the cinderblocic ��all, the ��-a11 could be finished on both sides to be presentable. • Said there �vas a rear access roacl behind the building and vehicles are usuig it. He sug�ested putting in three speed bumps in different locations to slo�� do«n the vehicles. Louise Huganin, Cupertino resident: • Said that the lights are on fi 6:�0 p.in. to 6:�0 a.m.. asid cast in on the upper portion of the houses along the periineter, reflecting across the street. She questioned the reason for the lights to remain on all night and aslced «h�T the standa�ds had to be so high. She has had no contact �vith the o«ner, nor did she contact a�iy of the neighbors about the liglituig. She said the�r �vould prefer that the lights be tui off at 9 p.in. • She also eipressed concei about the trash and litter in the parlcing lot, the trash �vill �ttract vermin; and she did not �vant the trash up a�ainst the neiglibors. Jennifer Griffin, Rancho Rinconada resident: • Said the concept of speed buinps is good because it results in constrained access to the propert5-. She eipressed concern about the narro« entrance to the left side of the propert�-, and the delivei�T tn�cics going do��-n the sinall alle�T to deliver fi�rniture in the bacic pa�lciiig lot. She said she hoped that the trucics had bacic up ��aining lights and signals because of the rislc of children in the 1re1; and stated her concein abol�t the loading 1re�s, unloading fuinittue ���hen parents are bringing children in and out regardless «hat tiine of da�-. She sug�ested hlving the trucks come in one entrance and e�it out of the other and keep the children ingress and ezit in one area. She also stressed the need to inalce sure that the pla�-ground «all is inacle of concrete. • She ��ished the ne�v retailers success a�id said it ��as good for Cupertuio to have inore active businesses. Steve Scharf, Cupertino resident: • Relative to the ne�� road in the bacic, sl�ggested doing soinethi�ig similar to «hat �� as done in the shopping center on DeAnza Boulevard �vhere Lucky store is; fencing it off so the trucks or cars cannot go in and out at iught. Given that, there ��ould be no reason to ha�e the lights on for 12 hours. • Said he felt it «�as preinature to approve the project until the applicant can coirect all the deficiencies fi the previoi�s approval, given the �pplicant's histoi of violating the requireinents slich as lighting, shielding, etc. and ��-hat the�- did �� ith the �� al1. Erik Schoennauer: • Said there are no intentional deficiencies: if for soine reason the lighting fiztures «ere installed in a manner not consistent «ith the approved plan or the policy, the�T «ill rectif�r that. Said the photo inetric lighting plan in the set has been studied and the proposed lighting plan is consistent �� ith the li�hting policy� of the cit�- and the��� are obligated to unpleinent it �vhen inoving to constn�ction. • Relative to the «a11, the neighbor recalled that ���hen it «as discussed over a�Tear ago. the Plaiming Commission and Cit�- Council conceded the fact that there �tias a pre-eiisting ��-a11 and to require tear do��-n of the ��-all and building a brand ne�� ��all ��as an unreasonable burden, nor is it green to tear out an eiistuig ���all. It «-as decided that a masoni «a11 �vas an appropriate approach and the��� could build up the ���all. • With regard to the trash enclosure. it can be inoved to the other side if prefei that discussion occurred a y�ear and a half ago and the�- ��ere balancing those competing demands. 15 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll He said he felt the proposed location ���orlcs best but if the propert�- li�ie is prefei�red, the�- �vould be ���illing to chan�e it if it could functionall�T ���orlc. • Relative to speed buinps. he recalled it «-as the cit�T's desire that all the rear pa�lang lots connect together and that the throubh vehicle access occur, and it «as the cit�-'s desire not to have speed buinps in that corridor during the previous approval. Ho�zever, if there is a desire to have a speed bmp there, he said the�- assume that is feasible: it has not been the city's desire in the previous approvals. • Relative to the trucics bacl�ing up. there is lo�v delivei�r trucic traffic. �vith a maiiinuin of one large truck per dati- ��-ith � fi of 3 to 5 tiines per �veelc. California Departinent of Transportation requires the tn�cics to have beeper signals for bacicin� up; in addition it is CORT polic�T that each truck haVe t«�o drivers and coinpan�- polic�-, that ��hen bacl�ing up, the second ��-oilcer froin the trucic must get out of the vehicle and assist in backing the tn�cic to inalce sure there are no pedest�ians or obstacles i�i the �va�-. • The ti�ucics delivering to CORT regularly deliver to apartment coinpleies and neighborhoods throughout the Ba�- Area; the driveis are veiti� eiperienced at driving, bacicing and loacliug and unloading i�i areas �� ith man�- pedestrians; he said no one is inore uiterested in maintaining safet�- on the propert�r than thev are. • He asked for support in approvin� the lpplicltion; stating the�T ���ere cominitted to ensure that 1n�- of the constnaction just finished is in full coinplilnce �iith the approved use permit 1nd cit�- polic�-. Chair Lee closed the public hearing. Gaiy Chao: • Said that relative to the lighting hours, there is not a maiiinum liinitation ui tei7ns of �vattage. but a miniinum requireinent in terins of foot candle; for securit�r reasons all coinmercial parlcing lots ��ould ha�e to inauitain a certaui amount of lightuig level. There is criteria ��-hich is also a condition in the project that thev inust have cutoff shields; there shall not be an�-light pollution that spills over into residenti�l propertti- boundlries. Staff is conf�ident the�� can �vorlc �� ith the propert� o��ner to fiz that. • Said there is a certain level of finishi�ig not coinpletel�- done because the�- kno�v the�- have to coine bacic and re��ork the parking lot; the pei7nit for the Acadein�� is not coinpletel�- finalized so there a�e opportuiuties to discuss the fiies. • Relltive to speed bumps. he clarified that there «ere t�� o speed buinps; one speed buinp that has been installed; one ne�v one is being i�istalled. There is a sigiuficant grade difference: there 1re t�vo hindrances at the boundlries of the entrances or eiits to the propertti-. • Rel�tive to signage: he said originall�- the Kiddie Ac�demy use pei7nit had requireinents on si�nage; the�- are not completel�- done �vith the pei7nit, some of the final touches have not been i�nplemented. He recommended that �vith this application staff ���ould reinforce that; some of the signs 1re out there; if there are deficiencies the� can be e�plored «ith the applicant. There can be a condition in the perinit about construction so the delivei�T trucic drivers respect it; the�r are typical standard requirements l�suall� requested but the�- can be added to reinforce thein. Aarti Shrivastava: • Regardin� trash enclosures, one of the reasons the�- a�e on the site is not just for the trash collector to lccess them, but eiperience sho« s thlt if the�r are at the edge of the propert�-, the part t1�at is on the other person's propert�- line tends to collect a lot of trash and the cit�� receives man�- coinplaints. If it is squarel�- on the site, there is inore care talcen because it is on site. As stated b�- Mr. Huganin, thev didn't �vant those trash enclosures to be on the propert�- line bec�i�se �vherever it is, the edges tend to get neglected. 16 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll George Schroeder: • Relative to the conditions about the retaining «a11, he stated that it �vas not specified both sides. but the final design is sul?ject to Plannin�'s approval. As Gai�T Chao previousl�- mentioned, the building pennit still has to be finalized; 1nd that can still be implemented at this tiine. Gaiy Chao: • Added that in the original condition, the intent of the �� a11 �vas for noise screening, but also visi�al screening; 1nd that the�� �vould e�pect that the �vall be finished on both sides; the �vall itself shouldn't be a visual detei7ent. Tom Huganin: • Said that if a condition «-as iinplemented that both sides should be finished. he �ias certain they could arrange for the neighbors to provide access if the�- are interested ui having tlieir side of the �vall finished to spec. Valerie Armento, City Attorney: • Coininented that soine of the neighbors inight not ��ant people to enter their propert�r to do ��orlc; there can be a condition that sa�-s it is the eipectation that the propert�- o��ner �� «ork «ith the neighbors and offer to upgrade the �vall, but ultunatel�- if a private propert�- o«mer does not ��-ant someone to come on their propert�- a�id do somethuig to the ��all, the�- cannot be forced to do that. Erik Schoennauer: • Stated for the record that the�- ��ere �� illing to fiiush the residential side of the «a11 identical to the coininercial side of the �vall to the eitent the propert5r o�vner ��ants thein to and is ��-illing to provide access. He clarified that the}- bl�ilt the ��a11 consistent ��ith condition of approval but understood the point inade and «-ere ���illing to rectif�- that and finish the residential side as the o��-ners requested. Com. Brophy: • Said he felt the four issues discussed b�- Tom Huganin �vere issues that need to be considered; the lighting violates both the ordinance and the terms of conditions and needs to be rectified in terms of flooding onto the adjoining residential properties. • Unfinished ��a11 has alreadv been discussed. • Said he �� ould prefer to have staff handle the issues related to the location of tlie trash area: since the di�inpster is beiug used for non-foods the matter is less pressing. It is a technical issue to design parl�ing lots so that the tn�cics casi �et in safel�-. • Relative to speeding on the access road, as the applicant's representative pointed out, the cit�- designed the lccess roacl and if something needs to be done, the cit�- traffic engineer should loolc at it and identif�- solutions. He said he did not feel that particular problem �<<�s clused b�- tlus applicant or b�- the application bei�ig considered. Vice Chair Miller: • Added that the other itein of concern �� as the number of hours the li�hts should be on, or the time the�- should be turned off. Aarti Shrivastava: • Said there is a securitv requireinent for a certain level; staff �tiill see if it can be reduced to the inini�nuin level reql�ired and malce sure there a�e cutoffs. The idea is to ha�e lighting in the bacic paildng lots so one can see «hat is �oing on in the bacic area and especiall�- for patrol cars driving around the area to have clear vision of the area. 17 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll • Said that the lights are on all night �vith lo�ver lumens ��ith cutoffs, so the�- �vould focus just on the parlcing lot and not into people's homes: �vhich is a reasonable requirement. Staff can �vorlc ���ith the lppliclnt to ensure the�- are able to achieve securit�- as ���ell as the cutoffs �tiithout �ffecUng the neighbors. • Said that �� ith the approvals. the intent �vas to have a speed buinp at either end of the propert�- li�ie; as Gai Chao said, a natural speed buinp on the east side and a speed buinp on the «est side. Tom Huganui sl�ggested addin� a third speed buinp in the iniddle; originall� the traffic engineer «as not in fa�or of that because he felt that the number of speed buinps ���ere �dequate in addition to the t�vo they �vere goiug to h�ve at the east end of the propert��; ho�� ever, staff can re-loolc at it. Refei7ing to the site plan, the islasids haVe alread�- been bl�ilt in the bacic and there ��ill have to be soine t�pe of odd diagonal speed buinp if ti to connect an island to a�iother island; there is no direct connection. • She said at this point staff can h to «-orlc �vith the propert�T o��ner to the �tiest but he doesn't cui7entl�- have an application on file. As projects come in, staff tries to rectify those issues. Tom Huganin: • Said the priinai��� concern is the high speed of the vehicles, especiall�- trucics; and people use it as a shortcut. Aarti Shrivastava: • Said that part of the reason the�- encourage those connections are for people to avoid going in and out of Stevens Creek and ti uig to malce left turns into properties; the idea ��as to connect the parlcin� lots. Staff can loolc at speed buinps because the� can be vei effective; also postin� a speed limit sign or slo��- do«7i sign is also an option to consider. Staff «�ill talk to the traffic engineer to see if he ��-ould recoinmend a site. She said that relltive to trucics idling, there ��as a sign indicating "no idling". Valerie Armento, City Attorney: • Said the prior spealcer indicated that the trucics related to the former fuiniture store �vere part of the problem and that store is no longer fi�nctioning at that location, hence part of th�t inight go a��a�-. There can be a condition about truclts not idling, but that could be difficult to enforce because it has to be caught at the tiine the�r are actuall�� doing it. Aarti Shrivastava: • Said that if a condition eiists, there should be a sign so that people �vho are actuall�r malcing the noise are ��� are that there is � condition prohibiting idling. The code enforceinent off�icers are responsible about getting out there earl� in the inorning to �� atch operations. She said it �vas important to put out �s much infonnation as possible to get the greatest chance of success for an operation. Gary Chao: • Stated that Condition 18, Part 2, addresses that prior to issuance of final occupanc�- the applicant ��i11 be required to post pei7nanent signage along the rear sound «all and bv the lolding b1�r subject to the approval of the Director of Cominunit�T Developinent, to advise drivers/custoiners to be respectful of the adjacent neighbors b�- aclhering to delivei schedules and bv turning off their engines ��hile loading and unloading. Aarti Shrivastava: • Suggested t«o otlier iteins, including a inii and i�icreasing the size of the sign for the Kiddie Acadein�-. 18 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll George Schroeder: • kiddie Acacleiny� has a sign out fi on the entrance on Stevens Creelc; there is a sign that sa�-s pail�ing in the bacic; there is also some reserved parlcing spots b�T the pla�-ground for picic up and drop of children. Com. Brownley: • Suggested a recominendation to staff to consider either a'`lceep slo�v speed" or "« atch for children" sign, close to I�iddie Acacleinv in the bacic because people ���ill be driving around back. Also possiblv consider ��hether inii7ors lround that corner �vould be helpful or not. Valerie Armento, City Attorney: • Sugbested it ���ould be best to haVe a generic condition stating that the applicant ��ould «�orlc ��, ith both Plamung and Engineeiin� staff to develop an appropriate signage and/or inirror t�-pe plan and leave it to tlie eiperts to figure it out. Chair Lee: • Aslced if it «�as agreeable to the rest of the Coininission to ha�e staff ���orlc « the applicant to revie�v an�r needed si�ns 1nd inirrors to increase safet�-. Com. Sun: • Said he «ould support a condition relating to the lighting and the �� a11, but refer the possibilitST of using inirrois and speed bumps to the traffic engineer and cit�- staff for their decision. Motion: Motion by Vice Chair Miller, to recommend approval of Application M-2011-07, ASA-2011-16, per the model resolution with the following additions: � current lighting violations will be rectified; � staff will work with applicant in reviewing location for trash enclosure with the possible consideration of moving it to the other side to the edge of the property; � the applicant will finish the wall on the residents' side with the expectation that the owners of those residences will permit that to be accomplished; � staff and the applicant will work in terms of slowing traffic down either inserting another speed bump and/or adding appropriate signage; � staff will also consider whether a mirror is appropriate or not to back the trucks up to the loading dock; � staff will look at addition of larger signs or additional signs at the Kiddie Academy. Chair Lee proposed a friendly amendment, accepted by Vice Chair Miller: � Page 316, staff to work with the property landlord to ensure that Kiddie Academy patrons use the rear lot for dedicated pick up and drop off of children; and staff to work with applicant to ensure that there is signage indicating Exit Only and Do Not Enter, that it is placed at the exit of the front parking aisle onto Stevens Creek Boulevard. Motion was seconded by Chair Lee, and unanimously carried 5-0-0. Chair Lee declared a recess. 19 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll 6. M-2011-03, M-2011-04 Modification to a previousl�- approved Architectural and M-20ll-OS Site application (ASA-2008-04) to eitend the eipiration David Jamieson (Kimco date for three vears: Modificltion to a previousl�r Realty) approved Use Pei7nit (U-2007-06) to eitend the 10825-10983 No. Wolfe Rd. eipiration date for three yea�s; Modification to a (Cupertino Village) previously� approved Architectural and Site application (ASA-2007-10) to eitend the eipiration date for three �-ears. Planni�g C'o�nmission decision final z��rless crppt°oved. Chair Lee refi fi discussion of the application as she is o��mer of busuiess across the street. She left the ineeting and did not retuin. Simon Vuong, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report: • Revie�ved the application for 1 inodificltion to a previousl�T lpproved use perinit. architectural 1nd site approval, and architectural and site approval for the puipose of e�tending the eipiration date of the approvals three years be�-ond the one-year e�tension previousl�- granted, �s outlined in the staff report. • The eitension relates to the developinent of t��-o retail buildin�s and a t��-o-level parlcin� structure; the applicant is requesting an eitension of three aclditional �-ears because of « tenant interest and the current econoinic situation. • He revie�ved the project site and sui7ounding location, bacic�round of the application dating back to 2008, site plan, benefits to the cominunit� and eiainples of ei approvals. Discussion details are outlined i�i the staff report. • Staff recoininends that t1�e Planning Coininission recominend to Cit�� Council approval of the application in accordance ��ith the draft resolution. • Staff ans«ered questions regarding the proposed eitension. It ��as noted that if the applicant changes their mind «ithin the three vear eitension period of usage of center, the�- «ould ha�e to retuin to the cit�� to malce changes to the permit. She also disci�ssed benefits to the cominunit�- of granting e�tensions be�-ond the three �-ears. Dave Jamieson, Director of Asset Management for Kimco Realty: • Said thlt the econoin�- has posed several challenges that have coinproinised their abilit�- to inove foi���ard «ith the developinent; there is evidence that the conditions are improving «ithin Cupertino Vill�ge and Cupertino as a ��hole. There is a rene�ved developinent lctivit�- and the�- feel confident that the additional three �-ears �tiill provide the opportl�nit�- to move the project foi���ard ��-hich ���ill not on1�- eiiliance the value of Cupertino Village, but also the sui7ounding coinmunit�T and the benefits that �tiould be contributed as a result of the project. Vice Chair Miller opened the public hea�ing. Jennifer Griffin, Rancho Rinconada resident: • The center is an iinportant pa� of Cupertino; it is a�ood neighbor a�id she ���as unpressed ��-ith ILiinco since the�- purchased the propert�T; it is al�tia�rs neat and tid�- «ith man�- people enjo�-ing the area. She said considering econoinic conditions, and also «ith the advent of the Apple purchase of the HP ca�npus, and that the propertv and the HP cainpus a�e one of the main northein entrances to Cupertino, it ���ould not be unprecedented to give an eitension to this propert�� since the Main Street project �vas given an eztension and ma�- be granted another eitension at some point. Knnco is proceeding cautiousl�- because there are a nl�mber of things happeni�ig at that end of to«n. • She recllled that Ranch 99 m�rket had a separate lease. and �vhen Kimco ��-as going through the planning process for their upgrades to the shopping center, the Ranch 99 marlcet could not be touched because there �vas a separate lease still intact. She aslced ho�v inuch longer the 20 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll lease is for because it is a significant part of the propert�-:, and ��-i11 it be another deciduig factor in 2014 or ���hen the three vear ei is up. Com. Brophy: • Relative to Jennifer Griffin's comments. Kiinco said bacic in 2008 that the lease ��ith the groceiy store placed restrictions on ho��- the�- col�ld develop the propert}T; all leases are separate in the propert�-, but because it is such a large lease the�- had some control over ho��� the propert�- could or could not be developed. Aarti Shrivastava: • Relative to a three vear e� she said the applicant inust pull a building pei7nit and start building «ithin thcee }-ears. After the builduig pennit is pulled, ho« much tune to completion depends on the builduig perinit; there are soine requireinents of the building perinit phase: once thev go into that the building code has its o�vn rules; typic�llv it is v11id for sii months �vithout activit��. Vice Chair Miller closed the public hearing. Com. Brophy: • Said ui �eneral he sl�pported approval of eitensions for projects that ha�e been anal�zed and soundl�- approved; ho��ever, in the subject application he �vill vote against eitending the project because of the facts specific to this case. He said the project ��-as �pproved the ineeting before he joined the Plaiming Coimnission, and he did not have a chance to spe�l� lbout it the first ti�ne. He said the case of the parking problem at the I�imco Center Cupertino Village is obvious to an}-bod� «ho goes to lunch there on an�- «eelcend. • He said he felt the traffic stud�- used to approve the project ��as defective; their assuinption ���as that because there «�ere 691 occupied spaces ��hen the traffic consultant visited this site, the demand must be eqi�al to 691. The reason �vhy the�� didn't sa�� there was a shortage ��-as becal�se there �veren't cars ti to get into the mall that �vere spra�tiling all over Wolfe Roacl and Hoinestead. As recentl�- as 12:30 this Sunda��, he said he could not find a pa�l�inb space other than handicapped spot, and his opinion is that there is clearl�� a shortage. • The proposed plan for approving this project �vould malce it even inore dense, and citti- staff recognizes this in Paragraph 72 «here it states "ph�-sical measures to solve the parlcing problein shall include bi�t not be liinited to valet parlcing and other dense t�pes of parlcing measures". He said he did not feel that «as the t�-pe of parl�ing that the people of Cupertino �vant and he �vas conceined about the tenants at the mall �vho are virtuall�T all sole proprietors putting their livelihoods at risk in the event the center is not successful. In �ddition Apple is coming in �vith 9,000 to 12,000 emplo��ees across the street and to sunplyT sa�- that it ��-i11 be considered ��hen loolcing at the Apple builduig rather than asking the obvious question ho�v ��i11 Apple affect this project; that he believes the appropriate solution is to haVe this project start over again, rather th�n approving �vhat he believes to be a fla�ved plan. Com. Brownley: • Said he understood that part of the upgrades to the project ��as a ne�� pa�lang structure that ��ould address soine of the pailcing concerns for future visitors to the site. Com. Brophy: • Said ��hen doing the Crossroads, staff provided a parlung stud�- for soine previousl�� �pproved centers, one of them bei�ig Ikimco. He said the stlid�- does not reflect that the Methodist Church has a legal right to use the center for parking themselves. There is no cap allo«-ance for that; and at lunch on Sunda� s it is a fairl� large deinand. • B� the traffic consult�uit's o�zn estiinate using ULI studies the restaurant should be allo�tied 1� to 20 spaces per L000; so for the proposed eipansion he proposes that the restaurants be given 21 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll 12.97. This is the lcind of stud�r ���here the numbers jump ol�t; it is not a inarginal case and an�-bod�- �vho lives in to��n «ho has been to this inall during pe11c hours kno«-s that the center is overcro��-ded and to simpl�- e�p�uid plrlung spaces at a rate no greater than the percentage increase of additional bross leasable area ��-ill just malce the center «orse. • Said he felt the project should not haVe been approved three �-ea�s ago, and especiall�- given that there is no« a inassive traffic generator that «i11 be goin� in across the street. He said he felt it ��as tune to reopen the ��hole issue rather than approving a project that he believes is a inistalce. Gary Chao: • The condition requires that the parl�ing structure be constructed first along ��ith the sound ��all and then build out the reinainder ofthe project. Dave Jamieson: • Said the cost of the parking stn�cti�re is talcen into consideration for the entire developinent of the project. In terms of it being feasible, if the�- inoved foi��ard ��-ith the developinent, the�- �vould incur those costs �vhich a�e part of the project. The parl�ing stn�cture �vould be built first to ensure that there is sufficient parkin� available «hen the ne« retail does get developed. • In tei7ns of addressing the conceins «ith the additional traffic, the Apple facilit�- being directl�- across the street �� ould i�icrease the pedestrian �vallcing access; it �vill be a benefit on both sides, but diff�icl�lt to jl�dge if that increases the car traffic. Froin the pedestrian standpoint, it is a vei�- convenient access fi a«allcing perspective. Aarti Shrivastava: • From histon�, across t�vo separate approvals, the eiisting center bacic in 2007 �vas assessed to have 691 spaces: it «-as originall�- approved ��-ith 800 spaces but «ith a change to the use pei7nit, the total capacit�- «as 891 spaces and that ��as b�- restriping areas as ��ell as col�ntin� valet pa��l�ing for 26 stalls to create 26 aclditional stalls; hence the final count «ith all of those changes �vould have been 891, 200 inore for the developinent �vhich �vould be about 2�,000 square feet. • Said that b�- 2014 the permit �vol�ld ezpire aiid at that tnne if the�r hadn't vested it b�- beginning the building and continuing it; after that if t1�e�� chose not to move ahead «�ith it, the�- ��ould have to reappl�- for another project. Com. Brophy: • Said he ��1s uncomfortable discussiug the parking issue in detail because none of it �vas incll�ded ��ith the materials. He �� as loolcing at �� hat �� as provided a couple of inonths ago, and the consultant tallcing abol�t its ezisting la�rout using ULI ntunbers said it requires for its eiisting la�-out 7�2 to 900 parlung spaces. but through the iniracle of inodei7i adjustinents, the�- only need 691 spaces ��hich coincidentl�- is ho« inan�- parlcing spaces the�� presentlyT have. He said not bein� an engineer, his sense is that the traffic engineering studies the� see consistentl� seein to get the nuinbers that the projects need and in this particular case, coininon sense can talce �Tou out there on anv «-eelcend and see that the eiisting nuinber is ���ell short of «h1t it needs to support. B�- forcing this project to become even inore dense �tihich is the �iord used in the staff recommendation, it is putting the ezistuig merchants at iisk; the�r are paying vei high rents in eichange for high productivit�- froin Cupertino Village; but if the� tr�- to squeeze more into that rather than inalce it a better center, it ��i11 inake it a inuch ���orse center �t least for the eiisting tenants. Vice Chair Miller: • Stated the options ���ere voting for or against the application or continuin� it and havin� it coine bacic; staff ��-i11 e�plain the options in detail. 22 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll Aarti Shrivastava: • Suinmarized the options before the Coininission; either approve the inodification or recoininend denill at ��-hich point it ���ould �o to Cit�T Council; or chose to continue it there is a need for inore infoi7nation. Staff is not planning to re-loolc at the lpplicltion. but bring it in as an ei because thev could app1�- for another pennit. Valerie Armento, City Attorney: • Said that the Cominission could not reopen the application. but vote on the application being discussed; either present � inotion to eitend it or make a inotion to den�- e�tension. Said there ���as nothing to be gained fi a continl�ation: there is nothing to be researched; staff has ans��ered questions about no��- vs. tl�ree ��ears from no��. Com. Brophy: • Clarified that tlie nuinber quoted fi the parlcing stud�- ��-as for the ezisting a�nount of square footage, not the eipanded size. Valerie Armento, City Attorney: • Eiplained that it ���as t��-o different issues; if the Cominission inalces a inotion to not ei �nd it is denied, it is up to the compan�- to reappl�r, or re-evaluate; but it is not reopening the inatter on the Coininissions' inotion. What is being said is the Coininission «ould lil�e to continue this and have staff coine bacic «ith more information on the parlcin� a�id re-anal� ze that; and that is rea11�- re-opening the item on the Coininission's inotion, not on the application of the applicant. The Cominission is m�l�ing a recoininendation to Cit�- Council Motion: Motion by Com. Brownley, second by Vice Chair Miller, motion failed with a vote of 2-2-0, (Coms. Brownley and Miller voted Yes; Coms. Brophy and Com. Sun voted No) Chair Lee absent; to recommend to City Council to approve M-2011-03, M-2011-04, M-2011-05. Valerie Armento, City Attorney: • Eiplained that since on1�- four Coininissioners ��-ere eligible to vote, if the inotion fails, the converse of the motion is ��-hat the recoininendation is to the Cit�- Council uiiless vol� choose to inalce another inotion �vith regard to the application �vhich maST garner at least 3 votes. Restated that a tie inotion does not pass; in this case the inotion �vas to recoimnend approval to the Cit�- Council; ���ith a 2/2 vote it fails; the minutes can go to Cit�- Council indicating the inotion that ��-as inade, the fact that the vote ��-as split and �-ou can stop there. Altein�tivel�T if somebod� thinks the�- can malce a motion that «ould get more than 2 votes, �-ou can attempt to inalce that inotion to U�- aiid get inore than 2 votes. Motion: Motion by Com. Sun, to approve M-2011-03, M-2011-04, M-2011-05, with condition immediately from this year to start of building two stoiy parking garage in the Cupertino Village first, instead of extending application for another three years. Following discussion, the motion died for lack of a second. Valerie Armento, City Attorney: • Inteipreted the motion stating that �vhat is being suggested is a one �-ear eitension as opposed to a tluee year eitension because the condition is the�- have to build the garage first. If requiring thein to build the garage �� ithin the nezt �-ear, it is �iving a one-�-ear eztension. Her understanding is that the�- are sa5ring if the�� don't build the garage in the ne�t vear, then thev 1re out of lucl�; ��-hich is sa�-ing �-ou are inodif��ing «hat the�- applied for instead of being a three-�rear eitension. to be a one-vear eitension. 23 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll Com. Sun: • Said he «asited to consider the business economic situation and also it is a realit�- in the shoppin� center. because the shopping center is traffic jainmed in the cui7 condition; if lpplicant built the parl�ing structure and can solve the traffic problem immediatel�r. Com. Brophy: • Said the�- are lilcely not goin� to build the eitra parlcing if the�T have perinission to build the eitra square foota�e. Vice Chair Miller: • Said it �vol�ld only be solving the traffic problein for the period of tiine that the parlcing structure is up and the additional square footage hasn't been built. Once the additional square footage has been built, if � ou believe that the traffic is goin� to go back to an unacceptable condition. then it is not certain that an�-thi�ig is solved. Com. Sun: • Said if the ne«- t�� o stoi st� couldn't solve the problein, the entire application «�ill fail. Aarti Shrivastava: • I thinlc Vice Chair Miller is say-ing the t�tio stor�- parl�ing stnacture �iill be there and «-i11 help the e�isti�ig businesses, but once the ne�v structure is built, there �vill be tenants fi that using that ne�� structure. There ��ill be teinporai relief for the eiisting bl�sinesses after ��-hich the�- �� ill have to share space «- ith the ne��� building. OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS None REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE: No report. HOUSING COMMISSION: No report. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE: No meeting. MAYOR'S MONTHLY MEETING Com. Brophy reported on meeting: • Teen Commission reported thev are �tiorking on an anti-tobacco coiiference in three months; Teen Center lounge having a part}T on Friday Oct. 9 • TIC has had a large tl�i7iover and not held inan}- ineetings; the�- are loolung at the use of social technologies for staff and citizens, and have had ineetin� «ith the Cit�'s IT Director. • Libra� Report: A poet laureate has been appointed; a health science librai «�ill be added as part of the Cupertino Librlrv; there has been a decline in usa�e since the implementation of the $80 fee for non-residents. • Parlcs and Recreation Coinmission: McClellan Ranch Plan has started to get �ui upolte; last done in 1993 and �zill be holdi�ig public hearings in near future; soine question as to ��hether or not the revie��- of the ranch «ill also include a loolc at the Sunms parcel. • Fine Arts Coininission: Meets evei t��-o months; ma�i�T ne�� cominissioners there; the abstract of baseball glove in center field at a cell to« er at Memoiial Parlc recentiv installed; Shllcespeare Festival occurred this suimner; vote for distinguished and einerging artist; use of or�anic inaterials at Chern Blossoin festival. 24 Cupertino Plasining Commission October 10, 20ll • Bic� cle Coininission: Considering doing an event in association �vith the Big Bi�nny Fun Run; ���ill be doing soine �vorlc on bilce safetv ���ith the eleinentai school and high school; looldng to define bilce routes for Blacicberi Farm bridge. • Public Safet�r Coinmission: request if an�-bodv has an incident/accident to report it to sherif£ looking 1t alternatives for Alert SEC progr�un ��-hich sends phone c111s to homes for einergencies; continuing to «orlc on voltage prograin ��hich is the RFID tags for ��allcing and bicyclin� stl�dents. REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • Wi7tten report submitted; no oral report. Adiournment: The ineeting ��as adjourned to the nez regular Planning Cominission ineeting scheduled for October 2�, 20ll at 6:4� p.in. Respectfull�- Submitted: /s/Elizabeth Ellis Elizabeth Ellis, Recording Secretai 25 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPEPTINO, CA 9501�-3255 (�08) 777-3308 • FAX (408) 777-3333 • ��lannin�@cupertino.or� �uPE� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. 2. Agenda Date: October 25, 2011 Application No.: U-2011-07, ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-07, TR-2011-12, V-2011-01 (EA-2011-06) Applicant: Chip GrifFin, Ridge Conununications (for Verizon Wireless) Location: near 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Dr (Rancho Deep Cliff HOA) Application Summary: Use Permit to replace an existing television lattice tower with a new personal wireless service facility consisting of six panel anteiulas mounted on a collocatable 70 foot tall monopine and an associated equipment enclosure at a Planned Residential Project. Architectural & Site Approval for a new personal wireless service facility consisting of six panel antennas niounted on a collocatable 70 foot tall nionopine and an associated equipment enclosure at a Planned Residential Development (Rancho Deep Cliff). Height Exception to allow t11e antennas of a new personal wireless service facility to be mounted at a height of 64 feet where 55 feet is allowed. Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal and replacements of one, 45" diameter Monterey Pine tree and two Chinese Pistaches to facilitate t11e construction of a personal wireless service facilitv. Variance to allow a personal wireless service facility inast to be setback 8 feet fronl an abutting residential property where 75 feet is required. RECOMMENDATION: • Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, EA-2011-06 for tlle project; and • Approve U-2011-07, ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-07, TR-2011-12, V-2011-01 per the draft resolutions (Attachinent 1). PROJECT DATA: Pro'ect Featttre Pro osal Ordinance Requirement Existin�, 58-foot tall, Cable TV lattice tower Remove n/ a Hei�ht of Proposed Monopine Canop 70 feet n/ a Hei�ht of Proposed Panel Anteiulas 64 feet 55 feet maximum Mast setback to res. propertv line (outside RDC) 8 feet 75 feet minimum BACKGROUND: The applicant, representing Verizon Wireless, proposes to remove an existing 58-foot tall cable television lattice tower and construct a personal wireless service 26 U-2011-07, ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-07 Verizon Wireless Facility October 25, 2011 TP-2011-12, V-2011-01 (EA-20ll-06) facility consisting of 6 panel anteiulas inounted at a height of 64-feet on a 70-foot tall monopine and an associated base equipment enclosure. The new wireless antennas caiulot be mounted on the existing television lattice tower due to its structural deficiencies and insufficient height. The proposed new facility is designed for antenna collocation and a separate application for a collocated AT&T personal wireless service facility will be presented to the Plaiuling Coiiunission as a separate iteni. The proposed Verizon Wireless facility is located to the rear of 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive near the entrance gate of this planned residential developnlent. The abutting land uses to t11is project are single-family residences to the east, south and west, and apartment buildings to tlle nortll. The project is sited on coinmon open space area owned by the Deep Cliff Hoineowners Association (HOA). Tlie HOA stated t11at the current lack of wireless pllone coverage presents a genuine public safety concern for residents in Rancho Deep Cliff, as well as the surrounding neighborhood. Existing & proposed wireless coverage is depicted on Attachinent 2. � � �' x �`�r re � `� ; �``°`� �, �' � 'y " v'�y .A i ' .� '� " � � r 3 �` �''� . +� � ''1„ r s - " +��C `.�"* , � '��,� � ` `.�� ���` ��� ������ �,�'���` ' i� �'�� ��"�'�'``� .�'�`� �����`"�'{�" � � i� 'I�'��� .�� ,� ' � �. � � � f � � 4 �" � r w �ar� . � �. � .� �� � � '����'� �,� �� ��a� � �.�� �$�'yf, # � }. �� �,� ..'3 � �# , � r 3 ._ �Q +� � � �� �� �:. � 7'ffi 1� } + ~ � ^ '�3'Y _�`,* .,'� v "��.. � � �' �?' �4�f � � a :. T . v � ..� .� P k y � + 1r � }-^. ,� ' ,y� y (�� ����� � � � I _ i �" � �� � �` �. , gq�j „�� �.4 ,q "m�� w. �� N'.�� ��� 1 . ' 6r Cp �' h � ��.. �,+� ���,'�� � ��� ' u �t, �-� �� t� � x ������ �, � �` �"��� �' � °4 �� fi � . �� �� t ��" � � �� � �� �� ��� � �� �� � � � S' �p � p � k �F �r "� � �� f ��5 ,. � �� � l�� � ��' � �' � �iC �.� � n � ��: .. � �,� � � / � : t s � , c. � et .. �'� e � r f �,�1 �� �i ;� �p,�- x si! � • � � t ��� � : d� � c-d �� �. �� . M1 ! � e � � f � �"�". ��` '' �r" ti . � g ` � � ��� � r � �d @� �" , �s..�' ,!�- "� �� � � :n ¢ x'� �{ �'"� � � �� ��k""^.,�� � �^ i��" ��I `` ., i ,���� f.� ,f ,..� � �� A T ......� . � .� f �.y � .. � "� aF �.h"� � � " � � L t� .� � ; 3 Y .• � � . � � . � . � f i � 4,w. ,r .' a ��t� s 4 $� . .. ,� '� �' °5t .� 4� �' i ��U' f� �� � ��� � .�' '� '� ,A�fi" . .� � �`'�t � �`, �' 4 � k .,�'�� rt��,: w, � � �"^�� �'�� �s��� �"�v�" .�; { '��:i ` � �;� p � ',� � '"!# T� �, � .�. � ,:��� � �'}� � �� � ,��`�� �.� � � �I�� i �.. '��` { k � iafl,�+` " �hr� •:",� �c.,.Y J }� . y; x � _� ��.. � �'Pi `�,� 4 . �a!t. � �� „� e ,,.' T� 1 r�i� s' . ` �" v � . �' : ,,, ..� �r d .�q �� �� �� � + �..t �a� , ` �}� �A� s .r�.�� ��CaaeC.�� .�'� 4 �.� { � � � I O + �� • �3 ° �g 9 .� � � ��, : '�` .. .:� � i w � I :9 � � - M :r�e �9�� ` � �� �i� '.'� � , ��� �g� � ��..''�f���.',�� � �. ° � � ����s �7 ��� � x '�' �'S: A � .� ~ "�' .��' �, �°" c. �_ .� �� ,�, �� � y ,� r._�'� '�_"� � �1 o � �.tl r .� �. .`�i .. � � N " � �$ +,*; � g$° �� �#�;, i a'� j �`a� �W� `��'-.I' �.� M ��°i � S �� a (�' � � ' S�e `a� . � w � � � ° � � � �.* � * ° � T �+..., � '�`�� '��'�'�° ���-'*��" �' •��.�.� rr �'� r ��� � d � . `�`�" � ��,r� ��"q ; �' �� .� `���, �.� �� �I� � d `�� � � � � . �� f �'. � q � � .� w 4 � r •r�. s.-�,.� � w'�' � � ��y�'� b� _ :`"�'� �� '��" �: � . F ' ' 3' .�;� :. . �� � � t � :. . t # � .� + �; � .�,. N � + . �� _. �* � ��r ,. - S� r k � �a i � � f �.� a � '� � y� } �r �1� y� s �— iA y � ' f k w � �� ti ..e y .. ' _ •i E 7�°� .� ���`,����� � � - �,�"�:.�°� 4�:t � . s / F. ��� e .. � ri:. `°.. ,- { �.,s. -.� +�+ t , .� - � �, ; �� �.. � ,� � = '� � �� �, :�- � ' ,�� ,� � g � 4 �. � �'� ; °�' F�;: � I �� �,,� �, �;�,, � � °," _ 'I '! �,,� 3� � Y � �:.- ��'� ��. "`'� ,�. 19.�� K �A4� f. �.a•+q.. . � �,�� • g � aG �_ .,�� -���. �� P ... r � ., , �ui'�R Fwz.Y L . � .li .. . _I °v tec. . � Proposed Personal Wireless Service Facility (Monopine) DISCUSSION: Visibilit� n�i�� Screetiitig of Wireless Facilit�� 27 U-2011-07, ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-07 Verizon Wireless Facility October 25, 2011 TP-2011-12, V-2011-01 (EA-20ll-06) T11e applicant proposes to reinove an existing 58-foot tall cable television lattice tower on the project site and install a 70-foot tall stealth nlonopine tllat will support antennas for two personal wireless service facilities. The lattice tower with antenna attachments is 11ig111y visible from Stevens Canyon Road and other neighboring streets. The monopine is sited within a grove of other tall pine trees to screen the lower portion of the monopine froin public street and residential views. See pllotosimulations (Attachinent 3). Other design requirements, such as, faux bark, painting of mast & anteiulas, inixture of brown & green needles and needle socks on the panel antennas liave been added to t11e Arcllitectural and Site Approval to ininimize any potential visual obtrusiveness of the structure. At grade views of the monopine and equipment enclosure will be screened by fencing, either redwood fencing or masonry wall to match the existing wall, as depicted in the plan set. From the apartment side, t11e mast will be screened wit11 new trees, California Wax Myrtles and the faux bark. Any disturbed ground cover areas will be replanted. Noise The personal wireless service facility operates 24 hours per day. Tlie cabinet equipnient is expected to meet City noise standards (i.e. 55 dBA at nighttinle: 8:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) with the mitigation proposed by t11e noise consultant (Attachinent 4). Tl1e noise consultant's recoinmendation is a 2 and �/� foot tall wall extension between the equipment and monopine, which is depicted on the plan set. The project contribution to the interior noise level of the adjacent residence, 42 dBA, is below the City requirement of 45 dBA. Geotecli►iicnl Co�isic�eratio�is The project vicinitv is located in one of the City's Geologic Hazard Zones characterized by potential surface fault rupture, and verv strong to violent ground shaking. A private geotechnical report was prepared by Beacon Geotechnical, Inc. and reviewed by the City Geologist, Cotton, Shires and Associates, Inc. (Attachments 5, 6). The City Geologist supports tlle project provided that tlle final foundation system is designed to resist botll wuld and seismic forces. The final foundation design will be reviewed and approved by the City Geologist prior to issuance of any building permits. A condition addressing the City Geologist's coiiunents llas been added to the use permit. Rc�c�io Freqi�e�iey (RF) Ef�erg� Afinlysis A RF report was prepared by Hammett & Edison, Inc Tlle report estimated that the RF energy exposures at the ground level and the second floor of the nearest residence are well within the Federal safety standards for RF exposure. The safety standards for cellular and 700 MHz wireless services are 0.58 and 0.47 mW/cm'-. The project ground level exposure was calculated to be 0.0068 mW/cin'- , which is 1.3% of the applicable public exposure liinit. The second floor calculated, cumulative (Verizon plus the AT&T collocated facilities) exposure for the nearest residences is expected to be 3.9% of the applicable public exposure limit (Attachment 7). Tree Reiiioz�rrl T11e applicant is proposing to remove two trees: a 45-inch diameter Monterey Pine and a 9-inch diameter Chinese Pistache that are withul the respective footprints of the monopine and equipment enclosure. The Monterey Pine is infested with Japanese Pine Beetle and the Chinese 28 U-2011-07, ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-07 Verizon Wireless Facility October 25, 2011 TP-2011-12, V-2011-01 (EA-20ll-06) Pistache is healtlly. Five 15-gallon California Wax Myrtles are proposed as replacements and screening for the inonopine base. Staff has identified another 10-inch diaineter Cllinese Pistache that nlav need to be removed. A plaiuled 2-foot wide utility trench crosses its root zone, even though the proposed plans intend to preserve this tree. I�l the event tllat this tree must be reinoved or does not survive the construction activities, t11e applicant is required to replace it with a 36" box Pistache planted in the general vicinity. A final planting report prepared by a professional arborist will required prior to final sign-off of the project. Alterrintiz�es A�irrlysis T11e applicant evaluated seven other potential cell sites in the vicinity of the project site. These sites are depicted on an aerial map (Attachinent 8). The candidate sites are described below followed by t11e applicant's analysis: Site # Alternative Site Alternative Anal sis 1 Repeaters & Utility Pole Microcells Not feasible due to the tall fi�ees, Various locations varying terrain, and lack o suitable locations. 2 Monta Vista High School, Not feasible due to low building 21840 McClellan Road height (poor RF coverage and uninterested propertv owner. 3 Deep Cliff Golf Course, Marginal RF coverage, Much 10700 Clubhouse Lane taller iiionopole needed because of hei ht of surroundin� trees. 4 Rancllo Deep Cliff HOA swunming pool area Marginal RF coverage; site in a vallev 5 Stevens Creek County Parl<, Not feasible due to poor RF 13300 Stevens Canvon Road coverage. Hill between residences & park blocks radio si nals. 6 Hills westerly of Rancho Deep Cliff zoned Inadequate RF coverage because RHS. of tall trees & varvlllg terrain. Hill shadows Stevens Canvon Road & Rancho Deep Cliff. 7 Stevens Creek Plaza Sllopping Center, Not feasible, inadequate RF 10625-10637 S. Foothill Boulevard covera e. In suinmary, t11e extensive tree cover and 1lilly terrain of t11e area limit the RF coverage of the various alternative sites. Rancllo Deep Cliff HOA is priinarily interested in providulg wireless communications coverage for its residents and that is why it llas offered its property to the wireless carriers. The Rancho Deep Cliff property has been identified by the applicant as being t11e best location to provide coverage to Ranch Deep Cliff and the surroundulg areas. 29 U-2011-07, ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-07 Verizon Wireless Facility October 25, 2011 TP-2011-12, V-2011-01 (EA-20ll-06) Heiglit Eiceptiofi The applicant is requesting approval for a height exception to allow the antennas to be mounted at a 11eig11t of 64 feet w11en t11e ordinance inaximuin 1leight is 55 feet. Please note t11at t11e 55-foot maximum height limit applies to the inast and anteiulas of the personal wireless service facility. The canlouflaging branches above the anteiulas are not subject to the height limit, nor is a height exception required for the branchulg, which is intended to give t11e monopine a more natural appearance. The Plaiuling Commission may grant a height exception upon mal<ing the following findings. Staff conunents follow in itr�lics: 1) The literal enforcement of the provisions of this cllapter will results in restrictions inconsistent with tlle spirit and intent of this chapter. T1ie pi�rpose of tlie orc�i�u�rice is to fncilitc�te tlie develop�ile�it of �� zvireless conl�rlitriicntiofis it�fi��zstr�rcti�re, zuhile protectirig tlre l�e��ltli, snfet�j, zvelfnYe r�fi�� ��esthetic coricerris of tlie p«blic. Otie of tlie clesig�i criterirl of tliis ordi►iatice is to seelc op�orti��iities for collocntiofi of rzeri�zls ori eiisti�ig �ilnsts �zf�d tozvers zvl�ere zris�tr�l ititr«siz�etiess is red«cecl. Tlie l�eigl�t eice�tiot� is fleedecl beazi�se of the lieigl�t of tlie si�rro«fiditig trees «�id tlie clesigfi of tlie nrotio�irie, zuliicl� nllozus tlie collocr�tiori of nf�otJier zvireless cnrrier's �z�ite�if�ns ori t1�e fi�otiopi�ie. St��ff beliez�es tlie collocatecl r�litel�rins cnfi be �zcleqi��ztel� scree�ied, forgoit�g tlie rleecl for ariotl�er c«rrier's �rloriopole i�i tlie tieigJiborliood. 2) The granting of an exception will not result in a condition t11at will be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be materially detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. Tlie griz�iti�ig of tlie lieiglit exceptio�i zvill rlllo�v n seco�i�� perso�uzl �vireless service filcilit�j ori tlle �iio�iopit�e. Tlie etitrr� �ole lieight cloes riot create n �tiotiopitie height that is sigt�ificr�t�tly tr�ller tlinti s�crro�cf�cli�ig trees. Ciuir«Ic�tiz�e RF erlergy elposure fi�o�ir both wireless fr�cilities zvill be zvell zvitl�ifi Federnl snfety strz�iclnrc�s. See photosinl«lntiofis rraic� RF etieYg� muzlysis (Att�zchfire�its 3£� 7). Noise levels zuill c�lso be zvitliit� Cit�� fioise st«ticl«rds. 3) T11at the exception to be granted will not result in a hazardous condition for pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Tlie heiglit eticeptiot� does r�ot obstruct n�iy pedestri��ti or z�ehiculnr tr��vel zunys. The City's Wireless Facilities Master Plan encourages collocation of wireless facilities when the collocation design is expected to be less visually intrusive than separate monopoles. Staff supports collocation at t11is project site and the City 11as approved collocatable wireless facilities at Results Way, Memorial Park and the City Service Center. Set�r�ck Vnrint�ce The Wireless Comnlunications Ordinance requires the mast or tower of a personal wireless service facility to be setbacl< 75 feet from tlle property line of an abutting residentially zoned property. T11e applicant is requesting a variance approval to allow the mast to be setback eight (8) feet from the property line. Prior to changes in the Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance, the Planning Coinmission approved a setback variance to allow a personal wireless service facility to locate on an existing PG&E lattice tower that was less than 75 feet from residences near Hoinestead & Stelling Roads. 30 U-2011-07, ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-07 Verizon Wireless Facility October 25, 2011 TP-2011-12, V-2011-01 (EA-20ll-06) To grant the variance the Planiung Coinmission must make five fuldings as followed. Staff conunents are in itnl ics: 1) There are special circunistances applicable to t11e property that do not apply generally to property in the same dishict. Accorclif�g to tl�e np�liaz�it(s), tl�is is the otily �ztinlyzecl cell site tl�nt nleets the fi�f�ctio�u�l RF coveYnge rec�i�irenretits for botl� wireless cnrriers: Verizoti Wireless r�tid AT£�T. Tl�e site l�ns gooc� litie-of-siglit c�ozufi Stez�efis Crr�i�oti Ronc�/Footliill Boi�lez�Rrcl R�ic� nll properties clozv�islope to Stez�e�is Creek zvitlioi�t tlie obstri�etio�i of trees rr�id liilly terrr�iti tlint m��de tl�e seve�i alter�intive sites ��o�iz�inble for tlie npplicnf�t. I�i ��dclitio�i tlre locntiofi is zvell-screeaiecl b� sliorter trees, zvitl� rec�sorinble nccess to rieeclecl utilities ��ti�� lic�s �z z��illitig pro�erty lessor. It� r�c���itioti, tlie proposec� eell site loaztioti or� tlie projeet �ro�ert� zvill resi�lt iri tlie le�zst n��io«rit of vis«nl i��lpnets to tl�e s���rroinic� rieigliborliooc�. 2) The special circumstances applicable to the property deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the viculity and under identical zoning classification. T7ie eonr��io�i o�efi spnee �rens of R1C-zof�ecl clez�elopn�ef�ts rrre eolrinrofily developecl c�s l��ridsenpecl �eclestrir��i wr�lkzur�ys or recrer�tiotlnl frzcilities. Tlie �roject site is �z tir�rrozv �ortioti of tlre co�turioti- ititerest rrYer� siti�rlted betzt�eeyi tlle rerrr of a sitiigle fn�ilily resi��etice ��yic� tlie rern� of rr�i nprlrt��ietit b«il��itig. Tlie r�re�z is �iot eo�ic�i�cive to the c�ez�elop�rretit of l��ric�serzped pedestrir�ti w��lkzv�zys or recrentio�ial fi�cilities. 3) Tl1e issuance of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zonulg in wllich such property is situated. T7ie ofily otlier viciriit� �roperties t1�nt �zre �erniittecl by zoaiifig to host n peysorinl zvireless service fi�cilit� nre: RHS-zotied properties, comnlotl ope�l spr�ce nYer�s of residet�tirzl develo�rilerits, pr�rks, Deep Cliff Golf Coi�rse, Steve�is Creek Plnz�� Sl�op�i�ig Cetiter n►icl Mo�itrz Vista Higli Scliool. All of tliese other �zlterflntive sites were dee�tiecl itifer�sible b� the npplicnfit. Tli«s, the grntitirig of this z�r�rir��ice cloes �iot cotistit«te n grr��it of speciizl �rivileges. Tlie existi?ig Irzttice tozver is i�� tlie srz��ie locr�tioyi zvitli rz sii�rilar setbr�ck to tl�e property lifie. 4) The variance is not being issued for the purpose of allowing a use that is not otherwise expressly authorized by t11e zone regulation governing the parcel of the property. Tlie Wireless Coi�li�n�riicrrtiotis Facilities Orcli�int�ce etipj�essly ��llozus tl�e co�istri�ctiofi of persorinl zvireless service fncilities iri cor�ir�io��ly-oz���ied arens of reside}�tir�l clez�elo���lerits zvitli n«se �er��rit reviezv. 5) The granting of tlie application will not be detriinental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to t11e public healtll, safety, and general welfare, or convenience, and to secure the purpose of the title. Tlie fncilit�� lins beeti clesigfiec� to bletid iti zvitl� tl�e resic�e�itinl e�ivirorifi�e�it �z�icl will i�iitig�zte tioise rrlic� geologic i�npr�cts. RF efiergy elpos«res «re estir�rr�tec� to be zvell-zuitl�iti federnl safety str�tid�rcls. Tl�e nz�nilr�bilit�j of zvireless coiir�iri�r�icatio�is covernge to tliis �zren z��ill ii�l�rove pitblic co�iz�eriie?ice n�ic� safety. 31 U-2011-07, ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-07 Verizon Wireless Facility October 25, 2011 TP-2011-12, V-2011-01 (EA-20ll-06) P�iblic Notificntioti a�id TICC/P«blic Conimer�ts The applicant held a iileeting for the HOA on December 9, 2010. Public hearing notices were inailed to a 1,000-foot property owner radius around Ranc11 Deep Cliff. As of October 20, 2011, staff has not received any additional public comments otller tlian ones described below. The project was reviewed by the Teclulology, Information and Coinmunications Conunissioners (TICC - see Attaclunent 9). In addition, the City has received a letter fiom the Rancho Deep Cliff HOA president, stating an 86% support froiil the HOA residents (Attacllment 10). The TIC Coinmissioners were supportive of the project, noting that the 2009 TICC survey indicated that this area was particularly poor for wireless coverage; t11e monopine would replace an existing, highly visible lattice tower and the project had the proactive support of the HOA. TICC stated that cabinet equipment noise needed to be studied and abated (Please see Noise discussion above). The Rancho Deep Cliff HOA has requested in its letter that tllree conditions be added to the City approvals of this project (Staff comments in itnlics): 1) Lower the grade of the Verizon equipment enclosure to the same level as the sidewalk in the cominon area adjacent to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive. T11e enclosure shall be fenced wit11 a wooden fence (Reqirest lir�s beefi iricorpor«ted iti tl�e ASA «p�roz�al resolutioti). 2) T11e applicant shall conduct post-construction noise monitoring at the project site and five nearby residences (22395, 22415, 22435, 22455 and 22456 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive) to ensure that equipment complies with all City noise standards. Applicant will bear the cost of mitigating any excessive noise generated by the equipment (Reqitest I�ns bee�i iticorpornted i�i t1�e Use Per�ilit n�py�ozn�l resolittio�i. Testir�g slioi�lcl be clelc��ec1 iiritil nfter botli zvireless fneilities �re oper��tiotinl so tlie ci�ni«l��tive tioise c�ti be st«��ied). 3) The applicant shall conduct post-construction RF energy monitoring at the project site and five nearby residences (22395, 22415, 22435, 22455 and 22456 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive) to ensure that the facility does not exceed the estimated RF exposure levels reported in the Hammett and Edison, Inc. report of June 17, 2011. If the estimated exposure levels are exceeded, the applicant will modify the equipnient to meet those reported estimated exposures (Rer�«est ltas beeri iticor�orr�te�� i}� tlie Use Perr�iit a��roval resol«tio��. Testirig sl�o��l�� be c�elr�yecl irtitil nfter botli zvireless fncilities nre operRtio�inl so tlie ci��iii�lr�tive RF etierg� etiposi�re crr�i be st�rdied. Please riote tl�at tl�e Ha��rnrett £� E��iso��, I}ic. report estinrates RF e�iergy etipositres tlint r�re fizr belozv Federc�l sr�fety li�rlits. T1ie City cr�ririot eriforee r� RF e�pos�ire lez�el th�zt is more stririgerit tl�rzri fe��eral st��tu�rzrds c�s re��uestecl �y the pro�erty ozur�er). 32 U-2011-07, ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-07 Verizon Wireless Facility October 25, 2011 TP-2011-12, V-2011-01 (EA-20ll-06) Prepared by: Colin Jung, AICP, Senior P1aiuler Reviewed by: Approved by: / s/ Garv Chao / s/ Aarti Shrivastava Garv Chao Aarti Shrivastava City Planner Conununity Development Director ATTACHMENTS: 1) Draft Resolutions- U-2011-07, ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-07, TR-2011-12, V-2011-01 2) Existing and Proposed Verizon Coverage Maps 3) Photosiniulations of the proposed monopine 4) Noise Letter prepared by Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc. dated March 18, 2011 5) Geotechnical Engineering Report by Beacon Geotechnical, Inc. dated Feb. 28, 2011. 6) Geotechnical Peer Review Letter prepared by Cotton, Shires & Associates dated May 19, 2011 7) RF Energv Analysis prepared bv Hanunett & Edison, Inc. dated june 17 , 2011 8) Alternative Sites Map 9) TICC Conunents 10) Rancho Deep Cliff HOA letter dated October 5, 2011 11) ERC Recoiiunendation and Initial Study 12) Plan Set G:plam�lg/PDREPORTS/PC U reports/2011ureports/ U-2011-07, ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-07, V-2011-01, TR-2011-L.doc 33 Aitachment 1 � u-2oii-o� ; � CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVNG A USE PERMIT TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING LATTICE TOWER & ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY, CONSISTING OF SIX PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON A 70-FOOT TALL COLLOCATABLE MONOPINE WITH AN ASSOCIATED BASE EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE NEXT TO 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DRIVE SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and � WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural � Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public � hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan, the Wireless Facilities Master Plan, the Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance and the purpose of this title. 3) That the operation of the facility will comply with federal safety standards for radio frequency energy emissions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are '� based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. U-2011-07 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of October 25, 2011 and are � incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. � i i 34 Resolution No. U-2011-07 October 25, 2011 �; ____________________________----_______________-------___________________________ � SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: U-2011-07 Applicant: Chip Griffin, Ridge Communications (for Verizon Wireless) Property Owner: Rancho Deep Cliff Homeowners Association ; Location: Common area next to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive � SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. � ; 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS ; Approval is based on Exhibits titled: "verizonwireless/West Cupertino/Adjacent to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive/Cupertino, CA 95014 SITE No.193868" prepared by L.D. Strobel Co. Inc./Design/Construction dated 06/03/11 and consisting of eight sheets labeled T-1, C- 1(2 sheets), A-1, A-1.1, A-2, A-3 and L-1, except as may be amended by the conditions ; contained in this resolution. ' 2. USE PERMIT ALLOWANCE The applicant is authorize to apply for building permits to demolish the existing television lattice tower and construct a personal wireless service facility that includes a 70-foot tall monopine and associated equipment enclosure. � i 3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS ! The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Goverrunent Code i Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section j 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the re uirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such ' q . exactions. 4. COLOCATION OF ANTENNAE � The monopine shall be structurally designed to accommodate the collocation of additional ', antennae from other wireless carriers. The co-location agreement shall be at market rates , with reasonable compensation to the mast owner. 5. ABANDONMENT ; If after installation, the aerial is not used for its permitted purpose for a continuous period of 18 months, said aerial and associated facilities shall be removed. The applicant shall bear the entire cost of demolition. �� 6. EXPIRATIOIV DATE This use permit shall expire ten (10) years after the effective date of the permit. The applicant may apply for a renewal of the use permit at which time the Planning Commission may ', review the state of wireless communication technologies, camouflage techniques and maintenance to determine if the visual impact of the aerial facility can be reduced. 35 _ . __ i Resolution No. U-2011-07 October 25, 2011 7. POST-CONSTRUCTION TESTING OF RADIO FREQUENCY (RF LEVELS I The applicant shall monitor and report on cumulative RF energy emissions and compare ' exposures to the Federal safety standards in mW/cmz when both personal wireless service , facilities are operational. If the operation of the second wireless facility is delayed by more than six months from the operation of the applicant's wireless facility, then the applicant shall , report on only his facility. Emissions testing shall include measurements at sites next to '� 22395, 22415, 22435, 22455 and 22456 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive and the second story of the � adjacent apartment building. The results of these tests will be made available to the Planning Department and Rancho Deep Cliff Homeowners' Association for review. The City reserves the right to perform code enforcement actions and/or revoke this use permit if the results show RF exposure levels in excess of the applicable federal standards. � 8. POST-CONSTRUCTION TESTING OF NOISE LEVELS The applicant shall monitor and report on cumulative noise levels and compare them to City , daytime and nighttime noise standards when both personal wireless service facilities are ; operational. If the operation of the second wireless facility is delayed by more than six � months from the operation of the applicant's wireless facility, then the applicant shall report �, on only his facility. Noise testing shall include measurements at sites next to 22395, 22415, 22435, 22455 and 22456 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive and the property line abutting the adjacent apartment building. The results of these tests will be made available to the Planning ' Department and Rancho Deep Cliff Homeowners' Association for review. The City reserves ! the right to perform code enforcement actions and require noise mitigations if the results ! show noise levels in excess of the applicable city standards. 9. ADDITIONAL GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW At the building permit stage, the applicant shall comply with the geotechnical '' recommendations of the City Geologist, Cotton, Shires and Associates, in its letter dated May � 19, 2011. � ; PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of October 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: ', Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chair Community Development Director Planning Commission G:/planning/pdreport/res/1011/U-2011-07 res.doc � 36 ASA-2011-09 I � CITY OF CUPERTINO I 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. ; � , OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROV ING AN ' ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL PERMIT FOR A NEW PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY CONSISTING OF SIX PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON A COLLOCATABLE, 70-FOOT TALL MONOPINE AND AN ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE AT A PLANNED , RESDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (RANCHO DEEP CLIFF) i � i SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION �' I i Application No.: ASA-2011-09 !� Applicant: Chip Griffin, Ridge Communications (for Verizon Wireless) � Property Owner: Rancho Deep Cliff Homeowners Association Location: Common area next to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL: i WHEREAS, the Planning Colnm.ission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and ' WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Conunission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and ' WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Coiiunission finds as follows with regard to this application: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general � welfare, or convenience; � , I 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 19.134, Architectural and Site Review, of the � Cupertino Municipal Code, the General Plan, the wireless facilities master plan, zoning ordinances, j applicable planned development permit, conditional use permits, variances, subdivision maps or ', other entitlements to use which regulate the subject property including, but not limited to, adherence ! to the following specific criteria: a) Abrupt changes in scale have been avoided. The new monopine has been sited in an area with , _ existing tall trees. b) Design harrnony between the new monopine and existing trees has been preserved and the materials, textures and colors of the new monopine harmonize with adjacent landseaping and preserve the future character of the neighborhood and purposes of the zone in which it is situated. The location, height and materials of walls, fencing, hedges and screen planting harmonize with adjacent development. Unsightly utility installations have been concealed. '� Ground cover or various types of pavements have been used to prevent dust and erosion, and ! the unnecessary destruction of existing healthy trees have been avoided to the extent practical. I c) This new development, abutting an existing residential development, has been designed to protect residents from noise, traffic, light and visually intrusive effects by use of buffering, setbacks, landscaping, fences and other appropriate design measures. !� 37 , Resolution No. ASA-2011-09 October 25, 2011 � NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED , That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this ' matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beg'uuling on Page 2 thereof,: ''. The application for an Architectural and Site Approval, Application no. ASA-2011-09 is hereby approved, i and; � That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based I and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. ASA-2011-09 as set forth in the ! Minutes of Plaiuiing Cointnission Meeting of October 25, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as i though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on Exhibits titled: °verizonwireless/West Cupertino/Adjacent to 22475 Rancho " r ared b L.D. Strobel Co. I Deep Chff Drive/Cuperrino, CA 95014 SITE No. 193868 p ep y , Inc./Design/Construction dated 06/03/11 and consisting of eight sheets labeled T-1, G1 (2 sheets), A-1, A-1.1, A-2, A-3 and L-1, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this ' resolution. I f 2. ACCURACY OF PROTECT PLANS I The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, i any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data � may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 3. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file nos. U-2011-07, EXC-2011-07, V-2011-01 and TR-2011- 12 shall be applicable to this approval. , 4. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Architectural and Site Approval is granted for the architectural design and site planning for a ! � personal wireless service facility consisting of six panel antennas mounted on a 70-foot tall ; monopine and associated equipment enclosure. i The Plannulg Corn.mission shall review amendments to the project considered major by the Director of Community Development. 5. MONOPINE APPEARANCE AND MAINTENANCE ' The applicant sha11 construct a monopine that achieves a tree-like appearance and satisfactorily camouflages exposed equipment by implementing the design criteria below: a) Use a sufficient nurnber of artificial branches of sufficient lengths to obscure the appearance of the ' panel antennae and any associated mounting frame�vork. '� b) The top portion of the monopine sha11 have branches of varying lengths to give the tree pole a ', conical form. c) The faux needles shall present a mottled green coloration with a color mixture composed of 20% � brown needles to 80% green needles � d) The entire monopine mast shall be clad with a faux bark material. I e) Panel antennae mounted away from the mast shall be painted green to match the foliage of the ', monopine. The antennae mounting hardware and RRU's shall also be painted green to match the foliage of the monopine. � All panel antennae shall have needle covers to blend with the foliage of the monopine. ��"! g) Cabling shall be internalized within the mast of the personal wireless service facility. 38 Resolution No. ASA-2011-09 October 25, 2011 The building permit shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director to ensure the above condition is met. The applicant shall perform regular ' maintenance of the monopine to maintain its appearance and obscure the panel antennae from public view. 6. EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE ' The grade of the equipment enclosure shall be lowered to the same level as the sidewalk in the ; common area adjacent to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive and screened on the south and east sides by ' a redwood fence. Any new masonry walls shall be textured and colored to match the existing � masonry walls. The final enclosure design, wa11 treatment/color and screening strategy shall be j � reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 7. TREE REPLACEMENT & RELANDSCAPING The removed trees are to be replaced with five (5) 15 gallon California Wax Myrtles planted between the monopine and the apartment complex. A 36-inch box Chinese Pistache shall be planted in the � general vicinity if the 10-inch diameter Chinese Pistache is removed. Ground cover areas that are ' disturbed by construction activities sha11 also be restored by the applicant. Final tree locations shall �, be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building � permits. Applicant shall provide a letter frorn a landscape architect, certifying that the newly planted � trees and other replaced landscaping are in good health and the irrigation system is operating � properly to maintain the vegetation. 8. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein rnay include certain fees, dedication I requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section i 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and 'I a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified ' that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and � other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest I ; within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally i barred from later challenging such exactions. � PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25� day of October, 2011, at a regular Meeting of the P1aruling CoiYUnission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll ca11 vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ! ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: I �� ATTEST: APPROVED: �� � II I Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chair I I Community Developrnent Director Planning Conunission i G:Planning/PDREPORT/RES/2011/ASA-2011-09. doc 39 _-_ EXC-2011-07 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 � RESOLUTION NO. ' OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ' APPROVING A HEIGHT EXCEPTION TO ALLOW ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED ON A '; � ; MONOPINE AT A HEIGHT OF ABOUT 64 FEET ON A PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE i FACILITY LOCATED NEXT TO 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DRIVE SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: EXC-2011-07 Applicant: Chip Griffin, Ridge Communications (for Verizon Wireless) Property Owner: Rancho Deep Cliff Homeowners Association Location: Common area next to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR EXCEPTION WHEREAS, in order to provide height flexibility in situations where practical difficulties, � unnecessary hardships or results inconsistent with the purpose and intent of Chapter 19.108 occur, an applicant for development may file an exception request to seek approval to deviate � from the standards; and i I WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the following with regards to the Height Exception I for this application: �I 1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions � inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title in that the extra antenna height above the i ordinance maximum of 55 feet is needed to provide sight clearance above the surrounding � trees and enable the collocation of another wireless carrier's antennas on the monopine, j which will provide effective coverage for both wireless carriers. � 2. That the proposed project will not be injurious to property or improvements in the area nor I be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare in that the wireless technology produces RF energy below federal exposure standards, and ' 3. That the proposed development will not create a hazardous condition for pedestrian or ' vehicular traffic because it is not sited within the travel ways or sight lines of pedestrian or : vehicular traffic. I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 'i That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, application no. EXC-2011-07 is hereby approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application EXG2011-07, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of October 25, 2011, and are incorporated by reference herein. ' 40 _ Resolution No. EXC-20ll-07 October 25, 2011 ''� ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------- SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on Exhibits titled: "verizonwireless/West Cupertino/Adjacent to 22475 � Rancho Deep Cliff Drive/Cupertino, CA 95014 SITE No. 193868" prepared by L.D. Strobel i Co. Inc./Design/Construction dated 06/03/11 and consisting of eight sheets labeled T-1, C- 1(2 sheets), A-1, A-1.1, A-2, A-3 and L-1, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project .Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section � 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of October 25, 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the ' Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i ATTEST: APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chair ' Community Development Director Planning Commission g:/planning/pdreport/res�011/EXG2011-10 res.doc 41 _ TR-20ll-12 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue ' Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. � OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINOAPPROVING THE REMOVAL I AND REPLACEMENT ONE 45-INCH DIAMETER MONTEREY PINE AND TWO CHINESE PISTACHES TO i FACILITATE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY NEXT TO 22475 i RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DRIVE SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TR-2011-12 Applicant: Chip Griffin, Ridge Communications (for Verizon Wireless) Property Owner: Rancho Deep Cliff Homeowners Association Location: Common area next to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR TREE REMOVAL WHEREAS, the Planning Coirunission of the City of Cupertino received an application for tree removal, as described in Section I of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Coininission has held at least one public hearing on this matter; and WHEREAS, the Plaiululg Con�unission finds the following with regard to this application: That the tree or trees are irreversibly diseased, are in danger of falling, can cause potential damage to I existing or proposed essential structures, or interferes with private on-site utility services and cannot be controlled or remedied through reasonable relocation or modification of the structure or utility services; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of the maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution begiruling on page 2 thereof,: The application for a Tree Removal Permit, Application no. TR-2011-12, is hereby approved, and I That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based � and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. TR-2011-12 as set forth in the Minutes of Planxung Coirunission Meeting of October 25, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED REMOVALS '� Approval is based on Exhibits titled: "verizonwireless/West Cupertino/Adjacent to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive/Cupertino, CA 95014 SITE No.193868" prepared by L.D. Strobel Ca Inc./Design/Construction dated 06/03/11 and consisting of eight sheets labeled T-1, C-1 (2 sheets), A-1, A-1.1, A-2, A-3 and L-1, except as may be amended by the conditions �, contained in this resolution. I ; 42 i � Resolution No. TR-20ll-12 October 25, 2011 �' 2. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. U-2011-07, ASA-2011-09, EXG2011-07 and V-2011-01 shall be applicable to this approval. 3. REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENTS The removed trees are to be replaced with five (5) 15 gallon California Wax Myrtles planted between the monopine and the apartment complex. A 36-inch box Chinese Pistache shall be planted in the general vicinity if the 10-inch diameter Chinese Pistache is removed. Ground cover areas that are I disturbed by construction activities shall also be restored by the applicant. Final tree locations shall j �'� be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building l permits. Applicant shall provide a letter from a landscape architect, certifying that the newly planted , i trees and other replaced landscaping are in good health and the irrigation system is operating .; properly to maintain the vegetation. i 4. NOTICE OF FEES DEDICATIONS RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section � 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and i a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and ' . other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest : within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. � PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25� day of October 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning ' Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: ! � i AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: I ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: � ATTEST: APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava Wirulie Lee, Chair Community Development Director P1a�uling Couunission. ; � , � G:Plannirig/PDREPORT/RES/TR-2011-12.doc 43 _ i � � V-2011-01 I CITY OF CUPERTINO � 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 '' � I RESOLUTION NO. � OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY MAST TO BE SETBACK EIGHT FEET FROM AN ABUTTING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY WHERE 75 FEET I IS REQUIRED NEXT TO 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DRIVE - SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: V-2011-01 � � Applicant: Chip Griffin, Ridge Communications (for Verizon Wireless) i Property Owner: Rancho Deep Cliff Homeowners Association ' Location: Common area next to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive � SECTION IL• FINDINGS ( I WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a !, Variance, as described on Section I. of this Resolution; and i WHEREAS, the necessary notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance I of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more Public Hearings on this matter; and i WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support this application, and has met the following findings in order to grant the i variance: 1) There are special circumstances applicable to the property that do not apply generally to � property in the same district, in that according to the applicant(s), this is the only analyzed � cell site that meets the functional RF coverage requirements for both wireless carriers: �� Verizon Wireless and AT&T. The site has good line-of-sight down Stevens Canyon � Road/Foothill Boulevard and all properties downslope to Stevens Creek without the ' � obstruction of trees and hilly terrain that made the seven alternative sites nonviable for the ' applicant. In addition the location is well-screened by shorter trees, with reasonable access to I, needed utilities and has a willing property lessor. In add'rtion, the pro�,osed cell site location ', on the project property will result in the least amount of visual impacts to the surrounding � neighborhood. i 2) The special circumstances applicable to the property deprive the property of privileges ' enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The common open space areas of R1Gzoned developments are commonly developed as , landscaped pedestrian walkways or recreational facilities. The project site is a narrow ' portion of the common-interest area situated between the rear of a single-family residence i and the rear of an apartment building. The area is not conducive to the development of landscaped pedestrian walkways or recreational facilities. � 44 Resolution No. V-2011-01 October 25, 2011 ' � i 3) The issuance of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with ! the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zoning in which such property is i situated. The only other vicinity properties that are permitted by zoning to host a personal i wireless service facility are: RHS-zoned properties, common open space areas of residential � developments, parks, Deep Cliff Golf Course, Stevens Creek Plaza Shopping Center and � Monta Vista High School. All of these other alternative sites were deemed infeasible by the I applicant. Thus, the granting of this variance does not constitute a grant of special privileges. '' The existing lattice tower is in the same location with a similar setback to the property line. 4) The variance is not being issued for the purpose of allowing a use that is not otherwise ( expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the parcel of the property. The � Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance expressly allows the construction of personal I wireless service facilities in commonly-owned areas of residential developments with a use permit review. '�', i 5) The granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or � improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare, or convenience, and to secure the purpose of the title. The facility has been � designed to blend in with the residential environment and will mitigate noise and geologic ', impacts. RF energy exposures are estimated to be well-within federal safety standards. The ' availability of wireless communications coverage to this area will improve public convenience and safety. � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted '�, in this matter, the application for variance is hereby approved by the Planning Commission of �� the City of Cupertino. � That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are ! based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application V-2011-01 as set forth i in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of October 25, 2011 and are incorporated by reference though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on Exhibits titled: "verizonwireless/West Cupertino/Adjacent to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive/Cupertino, CA 95014 SITE No. 193868" prepared by L.D. Strobel ' Co. Inc./Design/Construction dated 06/03/11 and consisting of eight sheets labeled T-1, C- 1(2 sheets), A-1, A-1.1, A-2, A-3 and L-1, except as may be amended by the conditions , contained in this resolution. ' 2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code , ' Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount 45 Resolution No. V-2011-01 October 25, 2011 ' i of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are ', hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, ' dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of October 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: � ATTEST: APPROVED: � Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chair Community Development Director Planning Commission i �� , I I I ' � � � i g/plannulg/pdrepart/res/2011/V-2011-01 ' 46 __ � � ,� � � � � � �a�1,� : . . 4 � q' . � �. . _ � � . � -_ ��I . ,�,,�: �. � ` �,�� �"� �' � �� � � � � '�' :,: . ..# , �' � �- ., . � �`} 1 � ��°,� . � : _ .� ��`� �� � � ''� '� � c � ''� � � �,1' � ' �� � ""':��C1� ►F� � �� r����r ,� ''�CY �*� . .. t i� y 4M � � � � s ,,�t � � ' `� ■ �� 3:�;� � ;� � rt C. �� •J 7 � � s � � � �. �� � ��� , . � 't1 � :�. 3 � .��. � S _ � � . �� • a � ��� ,�i � � �;;. ��. ' 1 , � � ~ �� = -.� �' � � . �� _ � � �� � � � f ���� � � (��.�� ✓ ..:�_ .��; :,'� ., � �... �� � ��.�.,� � �.. ,�,s.��..�.- :.;� � � � �� � � _ �,�� � {:. � � � � t � �,. � � � � � � �� � � � � _ .. . �. -.-� -,� 1r �.. lIt i'��.�tp,�(„t �t. , � . �.r , �. =-�- ._...- �s , ��:� . , ,�,_� � ,� �.-_� � �-� c� ��.. � 1 _ . _3 - !`� �fev�n� CrP � F .V> Y ... � i �� -� � .._ � s �!A `'!� � . �y � � . i �� � � , � � �, :� � �;; .. - : �.��'�... . � . � � � � � ::r � � � N~ � ) ( �� t � �1 S � V �' '� t� 1� � IT ,, ,. .. � � 4:, � � � ���3�. � �. . � ,��z.� � � � x � ti � x t�.��� � � � � �� � �, � � ���; �� � � �. � ���,1 � _ �, � `�. �� ■ � � � � � �C.} '� .� - Q �--��`� ��� 1 1 �� �.a, � � ,� .,� -' � c� y ,' n �. . _ . _. _. Existing Coverage Map West Cupertino Lacation of proposed site is adjacent to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive, shQwn as a hollow ring Ex�����g coverage in the area is r�� r�f �al to non-existent as �hown by the yellow and red in- �ide and around the proposed site� Alternative sites did not provide acceptable coverage to link to- gether the green areas. The dramatic topography and abundant tree cover in the area are limitingfactors pinpointing this spte to provide coverage with �ne sMte. Cortext ma� showing approximate area de�?�cted in Coveraae Map Attachment 2 ��� _ r R I D � E ^; ,r � �. s � ; s � �, f . , � ; - � � �„_ ;.� �. ! _ .. � �,-;� . .�. . . . zao aa� L � 5 �,� uoo+� a�yy � v .:,. - � � - n � , as 4 � � � Sanny�rts � ''c^��fttAw � w 1tiF�eeno-!,A„0 °� EFromc^t4vo � ��, � Pa�ama '.a LoSAft�s n �9h�mast � Pn�k � Comers . � ' ^s J� !t AV! ° INoo0land A�res � The HpA ar�s - :�� � 8S Ortepa Po•k µoTosieso a+o � ��� c.�*� Q,s Gd1 Canc 0 � � �� „ '�;r.: ,� S!bvens Crc�tR � . a��� � � � a Z m � � Cupert+�0 s��� � � � s � � � a � � ���' �° � �' �y � � � _;; a '� CalAD�285 5on� '4ospca �d `.wJ � O R icchem Ranch C7pen 5pace ♦ Preserve � cc� a.' �-k: . � -. ., . - - < � 8 �' �'�r ° Q- _ :;��� � � k� � � � ��� � �� � ♦ � � 1 � � Sarat a � �������� E�CKGRQU('�D �ULOR: Green = Good Coverage Yellow = Marginal Coverage Red = Poor to No Coverage White = No Coverage 47 CuVER�GE CfR�LE�: Circle OUTLINE represents PROPOSED Site AI{ SOLID Circles represent EXISTING or other PROPOSED Sites e.g.. The BLACK circle is under review �� �� � - - � � � '� � � �� ° ' -'� �� �;si � � - � _ �'"'� � � � .�: . � , � � � ., �- �. �� _� � � � ���..� ��� � � ,�.. . � • <�y� ��.� � 4 �� . . j�� �. .•. ' . �� -� . . �. . . . . � �. ��.. ..� ��� .. ,. � - :.j :. � ,� - - �� �.�: �� �-°� ��'� � '��� .�{ . � ,� � � i � . � J :�a i�, � �, � r �� �Ci ����� (� � �� . � -'" �� ' �� s + , � � � � .. � .�, ` . � -.� � ��a .;� �� , ,�� � � "e:.ta� � . rrs.�.d.. �. . :. � � . � �„ � � � i1�I 'fi t � >Y� � C � . �:>- 'd ° �.w �,? �. �, � y li -� � � ..�- � � � _- � � t �� � � � '� o � j � �� \/ � �� � � ::� � ;�� � ��- . ,�. ,� - ��'�� �1� - �; .�� • . [ � � 0 �� � �' � � � � .. .:� � :. � � � �.�ww�� �w����s' � �� � � � «�.. � � � � � � �!`� � � �.. � �� �� � � �� � �1 � �� � - -- . ,, -�.-� v ��� na�t�,�u �. � �► . . • 2� �- � � i. d � �. - � •' j A � � --t � _ � „ �.. _,� � �.,,..,,,,,__ � ' . ��.,. � . ,_�._ .� � S�ev�ns CrP �.c � � =� n - � i � �.rr� ��-: � . ��.�� � � ��� # . .. .�-� `,. <'' ' �; � � � � �,� � � �� t T` v .,. � ,� ..� �� � � f� �� �''� _ ° _ �' a �.. + � � 3 � �... � �. �� i � "s - , , '1 a� ,>��,r - , .-,. _: �. F- � . .. .. - � � .� � � � � � �.:� � � � �— � � F � . � �_ —� � � � � � ��rt �� I � � . .. .�.� `.i.� f. +� r" � �� � � 13� .` Q l��s•r� �t. , � « :. _r . .� .� � �- � c� � •� �� � � r� �� Proposed Coverage Map—West Cupertino location of proposed site is adjacent to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive, shown as a hoilow ring Rropased co�erage �n the area goes from marginal / non-existent to good / marginai. This amount of caverage is not avail�ble from either af the Alter� nativ� Sites including the High Schoal and Shopping Center on Stevens Creek. The dramatic topography and abundant tree cover in the area are limiting factors pinpointing this s�te to provide coverage with our proposed site. \� � � .�— R I a G E � ��.,, ��.�; �� ���,����.�.,�^ �►.r�� ._ . � FE t _! 't . < < ._ ,.. � t •M�+omAw �� � Los AKos WOOCI�nO AC125 The Miph a�s � r, Susmy�rts � Vy 1/Y F+�r�p-�; �.p ° Sn E Fromori lavo Wnghtmosi o Qa�am� Pa�k � Gomers : . /� - n* ;?a es Avt� a � 85 One�a Pnic Ho'�osteay Rd Q '�°r°�� � � � s.eve�s crocR a�.b � v `..r vA � �n , _": sc » � as o i � < Cetp C61f Q,a Gatl C�urse 0 � -. �� S!evens Gtek . R�..�. . 'icchetU Ranch a�en sp8� � Preserve ,� x � =,� * Cor�text map showing approximate area dep�cted in Coverage Map BACKGROUND COLOR: �reen = Good Coverage Yellow = Marginal Coverage Rec� = Poor to (Vo Coverage White = No Coverage . �. � 2�^5 ���d ,� : � 0 c � a � � � ¢` a 2 m � � � Cupert�no a�� c� � m � � K � � N � � •y�.• [v. n cn AlCerb � � � � � � � a ''"� Calebaza5 > s�n � �ag„ 'gosp� �d O �� (J6 m � O iA � � � �f f�18i ♦ � s LEGEND COVERAGE CIRCLES: Circle OUTLINE represents PROPOSED Site All S�LID Circles represent EXISTING or other PROPQSED Sites e.g.. The BLACK circle is under review I � � , � -. Aitachment3 ;� .. � ^ � ._ _ r N � . . t i � �'� : ' . ' �� .,_ , " . -.'! �4. � �. F � . P ` � . � �'. g � N !; � � �� � � � � ,,� � � _ �?c} � > 4 � :` - � r ? f� -��� .a�: : .! C z� r � �� � � ; � � —_. �< � � �, .��, � � � i ,� � ----�., a � � a a y �; ti",, + ,F - ; � � � i �. � (� � 3 ;` •i� �� t � � �p � `� d'. "-�«Y � _- t"�� � �, � fi A � L L �- t � � f V �3 � ..; � A ', � • ', � � . " `, � :, .. ' O •' a . � � :: ".1t �� � :�� ' ,�,� . � � �� ` �_ � In V � � r � ... ��` . � � � � � �. � � a _����...._� �, �,T��'� _ ° r N �� Q . "' i : '�,• � ' ' � N C I 7 ' �� ,. � t . � � � P " - Y � ,� � VJ . ~ �, � ` `' � o � ��. �' � - �. / > o �i a � " ro v �O • ,�, � � � a ;,� :�; , ` I' � E � { .•k . } � . '• � . z � '1 . � tJ 4J � w^ � � �' � � r ` _ �� � � t � � � � 5 � ,,. � � • � ' �� •,� t -�` �` � �h � -` 9 ; O � � � . . �"�" „ _ � R � � > , '� � .� ° +� y t p � � � � ' + ��� �' � � .:.� .�� G.N � i � � '� y� �k� i �� i � • r � � U r � ..- „ \ �' � � F .� j� � (/) .'"?� . � '� � * I • , �r� t T c? � / M i� ! O � • �� .. ,�' � + . i� :�` 4:�, r O 2 . - � i ° N (6 p � . + � U .S� / i� �' ^ _ � , / ro u� ar� ti " � '�Y. � / .�: c r� J ' w O R, , � J ca F 4- � � t � ' «1Jt,,.j - )/ �' � c i� .�y � � � �� � z � 'i a � `� � � � k �r' . y o ,O ��.�� f # �'q�i. . ... w�.� 'i t: ' '� � i� ��; -�.,~ f 4; � V E � ° .� � , � , �� O � r, ,,,�'., � �a � � � �� ,,,C � -:�� . ,� ° * v + r , f �,'�. bA _ . . � � �i . � `� � � � e. o •�+ � � ` � o .Q (5 � � c� n`. . . � 1-�t � � . ,F � . p � � � ' . L � _ � "� . f'. ,C Q " � � � � '' t , 1 ` r�� � { � ,q � 'r � �. ���P e .i' � p i�i , � at r � ., °,' 9s � � +E;��. .w v � c c � �e r � r . ; � o ��, O ��� � � - * _ i ,S� �.: 1�� - . .. - u `o � a • "_ c .. a, :� . � W' ` � ' . *� � o tC � :•.,� l� ` a � � ,�' � "= g � q .o Q,J �'�. � � "u, � g. > � f3 Y e A � S! I �� � j � U. . � . �• -�. p'"1 �{[�y� N r+ �• r �� �� . GI �h � ; 4~ s r �` � ' . � P6 F 'i . _�� i � ' .� . �' c „� �' �4 � � +a �`e � ,• ,4� 4 � ' • " e ,, , :�� , � , _ .. ...... �� e �,�. ` � . i. � "' ... � -- � � s _ #,. � � � � F � . .f ' .: .� �.:� ,. F. f1. �' i y � ��' ' �., 4� S_J � � � � -F �� � �.' �� . � � � �• • � w�� ;!, _ � �, E , � ` . tl , n _ . �-�, � � � ,_ s r_. � � n . � € 7 ,. . . r��. ... S,_ N � . a � * � _ � - e� -c �� � ; rn •�. 4g �; .�" . � � � ` • - _;;� � � �> � ,� . � ' � � �� �, �, �� , . ; ,:. . --- � -- s _: .. �.___ � _ _� . _ �. P n 0 N � C' ����, - . . _ � RI - - - '-._-__�._.. S � _ S C – ... , _ _ W ' � - . - - _ . a � Exlsi��g sieel to4ver �-'`.._ - to be retnaved . �,. � � -� � � *, : ' � ,� r �.: �, �� �=° - - � ��. n t� '� :t. __ a f .. _� o �,t' - ' �'-` t 'o a �� I '.�" * o � ' , � -� A� o : .1 � ryi � � [� 1i) f•� V ui o L "- � O � V } . P � _ a `' ��; a� � ,; _ �n o � �„ _� ,� �; o �, ��� `; ��, � ^ � � � �� ;,; � _ � � �� : �;� -�U � _ _ ,- � � ,,z �.. L�) � w � •� __ M;;�=. y . _ O E 'ti ��y West Cupertino o a c�i , r ° E�' 22475 Rancho Deep CIIH Drive �, ° � ` ` - � Cugortino, CA 95014 � � O � ,m ° c� �'° � `o e�, V�f7�lfwireless � a .0 � � �e� – � _ . . . . . . '8 C a eo U o _ _ p .e l/J � ' -- . . . �rn � � � � - ._... � . ._ � Prop�s$ed rnonn{rrne � � �; � � o � � �' ' U O �. / . �' C (1 O � Qi � t � r R "�7 a r� bS _ - - p p 1' �:' � .v ' . . --- � . t. .+: �:, I U 'p . — J f � � � , C � � �.- �r - ��r p "S7 .� ..' _ � , 'm > O _ • ;�.` ;�� Q. �I�1 s ! \ ;!.i�';' � �J � � y � L 0 J ,:. d � � �. C . •". I'. i�,: p f6 O : a y '� � �� � U O _ ."�„ 4.:•. � v G •� � �-v .`:.. O c � _ - '�,g�...�. � a Hl � 3 " G � N • � � .�U O � N UI � � �• C PM '-<�: " (I) � �1 " ,�; `' i p ' �% F -- _ '�o _ "i: � ,- o U .0 t Q �. V; 'i.- ,��� .0 N� � _ . �. � . .. � - o) C� . . �. �.�'.�'S_� ,.y �.,' . _ . _ . �. _ . . - . ._ .. � �i _ _ _ � _ _ . . -.- I `_' N- -.;�. �. e m e ._ _ 50 _ 1 .t � �1Y r ' • . . ,� ,,, ; � ' • . . • . . ,.. S, t� �,�'j� ,�," �t ` ��'p� , � :t� +� ,� �; + r$G;•. . -•.ii �� , � a�i }�� �`. -�'�� ° ��4 �� , .. � E � �.'�.. � , ' .. ! I � � , 1 i � - �! . ^`A .� f,�'A" �� .�: _ �.nys,� . } .' `. `/ 1; J � . � �.,�* � 'p y . . ; � , y '.r�,;:r� •; , t. �. , k� ' " , w �.� �� 4 . t ,Fj r .y � a �, f4 � . + �a, " * K � y . . „ f � . � .' . �. '__ • �� � � ���� f� { �... ���{ ' � - _ _ i 7 � . .. --r-...V. � . ,� � I/ 1� ff� . .- r +�' 'r s,- I � y 1. . .i,. A. `� J � ^ -' � ,�; �'_ `•"Y • ' A ��,i���:�* , _ r" ; � - - � _.. _ i. •�- - ., - �!`. „� . �. -.._ . . �. � .. � '� :���` ! f. �' ,.!h .,�✓ � x,s,�� ;� ,� _� � ,,�` �.�r,:l�� � 5 . . �� _._. � , S� � �, .��! .. �4" ry . .. --. . '� +� ' . . '� w[ .. a�. ' _ . . _ . j -. . .. _ _ _ .. _ - , . . . '_'• l ' ... _ . - . -. , �. . • � . t� - "_' ' . _ _ - ',' • 1 ._ , �-'�,.� _...s-.+-- , 4 "� � _ "h � i 'i �` �' ' � j ,�, . . _ , s..e ,-?,; . ,�` i "--- - �� �2. �<".;::. „<�.k��#�� . T �� � � ���'�t`�rC'�43 4 ;.: - :;.�,; ,. ��.. E����i��� ; � . ���,� ..--. . - . „_ .. . v _ ,.; . , . , , L� 6 • ` � �� 1 � ����'�. '.�' � � �j` .:q � ..q 4`• .� � ! /I �' ,.���. . f � �, "y .. � � r ti . . 4 i�a�''�` " � �� � �� � �. �' _%a �4M'� ���' / ' �`j f1 r �!'' � ! �" r ¢y � q { ��� " ���� ., "�'". r �i - r � . �� ,�''• . . '3a+k` �� � - j r � t i r; t .�w ' � , - '� r . � f � , • : ' ; ��.� a < -. , ' d �.. , .�', � �'�S'�' . '�� � i k `,�' K I �/ '! / . � ,�. ,� � ` � " "^� t � %. � �. ,�ye�y � } i � � '% .�� �� . � " .c . t... , 't _ �a'..- . _ . � ' r. � � . � k . . . ti b• • �: � �.. � ,r � � "!J �.h ` � � ' . � � � � y s �'` °.-+ , /' _ � � � b,'^�-���1 � �}�'�`arP �' t, � . � � . .. . ._ 1 � �. ' 1 °.... - �L,�{ �. * �r� s '�u•, / 'r4� a�,� __� _.,�_� "'s � 7 . . � �� '+.� '� �° •` �S �' � ",. ..-_ c "-° . _ .., t ;i. . F r �'i ' �.�,; . _ t . 1-•� �� • ^° ' �. �' � ���� . �s; . "L � '� _ /�' �% � t�c ,.' ��,� t�,<, P � � � , . ,. r- • � � ,, . � �'' � ` . ` � ` � . , a-� � � " ��,�, +w . . � � � � l �_ . r ' 1 ;.,'� G.i" `� _. , t, . . . ' . � �, � Y ���� * � �'�—i � � � . . . '� F ����'.�r,�i� aI+7'�� ° , - �F i� _ �; !_� ' ' i � . � ... , - F: f � �� : � � 1 � � � � ° } f i �� � . _ ..� ���.�,1��.�.,�,,k ��sc.:,: r �~ W , ` _ - - "� - .. `_ ,F � � � � _ - .. . . . . � �r.- , .. . .:.. t _ �„ .rop�i -�� ° _ � N � � 5 � � � � �, � . � C TS f � s ' ` � q £�+ I I �` I ;� I� y r 67 v�� � ^� .. f � 'C: e � `�;'� "� � - . ' ry . \\ °. � _ e `Z.� tr. , y '�'� .I �y.. A � �'" _' , _ O. q' CJ ' ` ��_" ' . .�:. .: -;.` , F ,� ' - J : �-! .� �. � , ' �r";� o .,.``� ",- -�.,�:.. . �� r c; � �;� � �� ,� - . _ � ����" g �4( C � 4,.:.a ' b ; . > D � �p �j v O A �`� � ;;�,��- ,�� � � . E � � w ���� ��: ,� •�. � � o � �' ��i� t. _ ��;�►.� - r ' � ° v '"' ' t� "� � I � . . � � y ; , �„ � _.- , A �� I 1 � N W -] .yP .: p 41 A Y � v �� ...::R Uc7 _ � � ._- , • . :�'... � . o �t hu � ; � V ��.:. �, ., � , �'`�i r y V , 1� �1 . �. f .'.F �f A � - . . . -�-�•- �"� «' � . UI U) ln "�PR � � e5i c /,1 `�Y�. . . . _. � __ . CJ }.� � � U i 1 i�� _. �Lr; � 1 ' c�. O ' - �i � . .. . � .,.....-.r..,.. . .. _ .. . - _ - .. ._ .: . . . _..r..---,-`� _. ___�r-�a+.v �..,.- ,J a U � � ..�:.���.;�, w=,. - West Cupertino 0 0 . _ � �. _ ��� ,� y� a� : - � ._. . . _� .. . . �- ;- :. a 22475 Rancho Deep CIIfl Drive a° „[ Cugertino, CA 95014 T � �, ��= c ,� o f„� �` ,--°- :a O 0 N � -.., el�ri.'`011wireless s� � �� a d � I C � �, U � 5 n 7 � � r � - c '`'' '�v 'r- ^ �,;;,.,�tr� c� � _ .,' i� O ' °� °��.. �",• . � q . c� ri � } ��Z' .o-.. ,� .' - ..:d5. � �� t� p a _ ,� ,� v, Q ��� � � a, a� � � � {� �fi •� - .. �, .: 0."' - :E Y � k � � �'ro�ased monopine � � �a ' � � 4� . > T t, \ .r '� • c a� 0 � '�`' � ' t \ , � St Y r�- o � m a ,�, �'"' �� "# � ' G * �* '��$ � + � � � M1 ��.�^'�aRry s , . . � � o 4 '. � � �;, - C , � X `y s ,r", , .:: .. . � a _ .:. � : . p io � � � � ' �� � ;t.� _ •� � y.� .� ��:�' 1� �" ,� < � ,'�'4 {*� '''����` t... � c �fn �'f�� � �i�'�"jf" � `� E Q :_..�� ...,.: ,w i .`� ° � ] G ' � • , Y +-+ �, � �. � � . � � � O 1 1 ° i : � " _ 1 �� f { .� N /�M . ,.�_. . . .�°�A_. . ��� �i� �$. BJ � / ��1 �� �Y.- , � ! �, i • � +eyr . �r ' GI N r � _"_ i w .�; ;ia' �,� �` � O „r - �� - � � (G ,� `< _ � �5:� `w'-: �: i � - �' E . � P s * /�': �N _ �.� �. r-`'' "� p -- . � �i .�F� ,y.+.,. ' �' - _ „' . � � �.r : y �' � - ', :aA " � � �� ur _ .y_�,j ' _ t � F- . �. ..a. ^ ...ti .;�m�.�.� . � ,r' z .� p r..... � ' r . _ . . . , _ , Y' � .�_r ;.,c. , .:' � N ' w 4 � - .. ,�. –�r+r. '•a.:� �.,41Y _ �ih�' ���3'� '��. - "" _` :� r�" � . � e� . .�wi�.. .�. _ �� n. - � � -dwr�n=. � __ _ .. . . �—,� . - � - ��;_,.^s;�.--�..;.._-. .. -�- ,-+- -.•. .. ._°�--�-�.--.�.- _ � � . . __° � .. r f " . � �. -o � ' . S � ' � • � 52 - _ � �� 4 �� . � Ait�.+c�ment4 � � � � � Y ��� � � � z� �.,. Consultants in A����L'�ti AudiolVisual 1� ��TC�1 ZQ� 1 System Cesign and Telecommunicalions ,so s�tce� s, Eer I�aren l�cPherson Sar. �rancisco Ridge Communications, 1flC. ca��tor�,�a sa � o� 12667 Alcosta Blvd., Suite 175 �rei: G�s 39� o��z �an R�mo�l CA. 94583 �ax: �15 397 0454 ' Email: Karen.Mcpherson@ridgecommunicate.com 325 S. First St. Suite '160 San Jose. CA 95i'13 Tel: 4L8.295.4944 F�X: �oB.zs.s.�s�, �ubject: Verizon West Cupertino Site — Ce11 Equipment Property-Line Noise www.crosalter.com cn� ies n�i saue�, r�E �OaT �1T'�11: David R Schwind, FAES A�tr,o� P�a,�,, P� This letter forwards our report on the cell equipment noise levels at the Verizon E�,d o�es�e� Communications West Cupertino site. This wireless communication project site is T',°mas A 5°h���'��, PE adjacent a residential property-line and there is also an adjacent single-family residence Kenneli� W Graven, PE OI] tllf,' C011 S1tP �7TOpP�I�. Enc L 8roadhuist, PE John C Freytag, PE SUIWIIO�IAIgY Philip N Sanders Robert P Alvarado T,,�,,,ds � c�,�et, Without any noise mitigation measures, including the enclosure wall currently part of the �U,��d��P�a,,, P,,.�. project plan, the cell equipment noise at the nearest propertyaline (to the north) is ;,�;�ha�, o-� P� calculated to be approximately 60 d�A, above the City Noise Ordinance nighttime limit Ro�s � �e���a� of 55 dBA. An increase in th� wall height of 2-1/2 feet is calculated to reduce the �aso�, R ���t property-line noise level to the Ordinance nighttime limit. This height extension can be ���S���a ����� fairly lightweight, such as a 1/2inch wood panel. Joey G D'Angelo �°S"�'� �°, R°,'F� The cell equipment noise at the nearest likely occupied area of the adjacent residence (on a r"" a �"s'�� the same property as the cell site; the west end is assumed to be a garage) is calculated to E�"''.,-ee be 62 dBA. The A-weighted sound transmission loss of a closed, inexpensive, thermally T�° �'�"`'E� glazed window can be assumed to be approximately 20 d�. The interior noise level is Paul Lenger �,,,;�,o�,,,e� � Fe,,;e, therefar caleulated to be approximately 42 d�A, below the maximum interior noise level , limit of 45 dBA required by the Ci�. Jefi Clukey � AndrsVJS�anley l��l.�� ������ Peter Hoist �������, G:����� The City of Cupertino Code limits the equipment noise to 65 d�A during daytimc hours �'����,' "�'P' (7:00 am to 10:00 pm), and 5S d�A during nighttim� hours (10:00 pm to 7:00 am) at any , "n°" , v �°i�°'"" location on adjacent private property. /;lex Sallei �'a"`'�'� �'���� The City has issued a requirement that the interior noise level at the iriterior the adjacent �:� �:���e �e� residence (on th� same property as the cell sit�) not exceed 45 d�A. Based on our ca��r��:�� H���y �,�� ���� previous experi�nae, we assum;, that this noise level limit applies to a closed exterio�� , �, windovv condition. IJlan�a D ttioordzee Ce;�bie Gar�,ir�. Jasmine Recidoro 53 Verizon West Cupertino � � ��r�� ZO l 1 ���� � C��,�, E�uy�n���� �iois� Based on the equipment sound data that we received and supplemental infortnation from Verizon, this analysis used the following noise data: LTE Cabinet #1: 53 dBA at 3 feet 1Vlodcell Cabinets #1 and #2: 74 dBA at 5 feet (each, FAC cabinets) Battery Cabinets: 68 d�A at 5 feet (2 each, T50 air-conditioners) Miscellaneous Cabinet: 66 dBA at 5 feet (T20 air-conditioner) 5i�r� D��� Locations and dimensions are based on the 6 October 2010 "100%ZD Rev A" project drawings. We hope this infoi proves useful. Should you have any questions or comments, please call. �est regards, Charles IVI. Salter Assoc�ates, Inc. � - �,,. � ..,s. � .f .� s .� � z, w,.._ .w j! � Thomas A. 5chindler P.E. Vice President E.,� � � K � �; l,r `.. �� � a �; rr' ��'�: �> xt ��, � � � � �; 13G `,��r-:�r ,irF�.t. Suitc 5C(i S��i � Fr�;rr: i.,�.., t;<_�lii�nu�� �-'4 "iOA� - �el a' � �E�7 ,;�142 F ,�.�, �115 .,�)� C�� 54 54 Aitachment5 C������i��i��l �r�gi���ri�c� �.�p��C �o�° ro ��� �ellular � �� �s�� �� ��� �t � � o�� i� om � � �nch� � I� ��v� � � r� , ��li��� �� ��br�¢�ry 2IIp 2011 Fm 100429 Pr�p���d ��r � � �� � �n����� ��� ��� �y �����r� ���tec�i�i�al� �r��;a P��. ��x �$�4 �a�� ���I��� ��Ei���°n�� 934��7 55 ��C����������,� I�� ��br��ry 2� ���� �ml����9 � e ������i��t����� ��� 1�6f7 �41���t� �9vda 5��s�� 17� ��r� F��m��� �A 945�� �'r��e�t: Pr���s�� ��91uGar Tow�r �nc� Un������ Fr��i���n� Pac� 1N��t ��pe�Yino S9t� N�a 19� � R���ho De�p �Oiff L�riv� Cup�rkin�, ��lif�rnia ��bj��te �e�tech�ic�l ��gir��ering R�pc�r� �u�horiz�d, w�^ h��� pe�orrn�d � G�����hni��E Study ��r th� �bo�� �°e�ere�c�d qrc�j��ta �The ��c�rr�panyin� �eo�echna�al ���gi��eri�� R���r� pre�e�t� th� re�uEt� �� �ur ��bsur�a�e �xpE�i°�tior�, 9���r�t�ry��e�tir�� ����r�m �nd c�r�����i�r�� �r�d r°��or�r��ndati�r�� �or g��t��h�i��6 en�i�a��rir�� ��pe �f prr�j��t ���ig�. �tar ���re��s w��� p�r��rm�d �a�i�e� ��e �t�r�d�cr� �� ��r� o�°di��e�aly �x�r�is�c� ir� ��i� �oc�la�y �t �F�� �i�e �he� ����r� ��� �r�p�r��J. ��sed �� ���- �tc��y� e� s� ��r �pin��n �h�t the �it� a� sui��ble ��r th� ��°��c��ed d�v�9�prne�� f���r� � g�ot��h�A��� ���i��er�in� �t�nd�e�ir�� �r�vs�ed �h� ���c�arnrn��d��i�r�� �� fi�°s� r�p�r� �r� succe��f��ly orrsq9��ent�d. �e h��� �ppr��i�t�� �6�0� c�pp�r���r°�i�y t� b� �� ���s�� tc� yo� �n ���o� �r�a���, P@���� ��I� if y��a h��� �r�y qu���i�n� �� o� w� ��r� b� �� ��a�h�� ������ea F2��p�c�uE�� ��brnit��c�, � � � ��t � ������ ���� �:�.,��� ��y����� � � �� �, � ����� �� r ; . �� ��~�;����� � � �� , ��� � .�c��s-au.� �? � �~����� � �, ! . � z� -� u �t �r � a=� �ra � c � � ����� � � � ��6'. �� �,� 1� �' ' � �� � ��'�� ��� �-�"�� �a��"�=`� ��'������ ����� ,� �'��"°� �'°���� � �y����`�t �� �gi�;mt�r 3� � �� � J�sh ��iks�� ���o �ii�h�9�� Ao 6��GI�r� �r�a���: f�������r (�iv�9 �r��i����c � ��_�. ��;� ��� a � €���� �c����� ��-� �a���A� Y . �..��._� �hone: (�C�S) 23�-9��i � �ax: (8Q5) 237-909�� Frr��il: b��.c�ng�t���ehr�ical�grn�il.ct�rii 56 �°�d�4`L� ��br���°y ��, ���.�. � ���A �� n Th�� ����rk g�°e�e�� r���a9�� �� � �����chn6��� �r�ga��er��g ����y p��'�r��d f�r th� pr�����d r������9� ��y9� c��99����r ��w�rn ��d c�����t��� ��uapr�a��t ��c�r'�g� ��t� to �� lo�a�e� �n ��i� �.o� �� C�a��r�ir��� ��9ifor���, � o pei�r to a�y �����r�a�t°s�r�, fhi� �orr� �h���� ��view t6�� fia��� pr��j��� �9�r�s �� v�rify �r m�di�yy t��� re�ornm�n��ti��� �ffer�d h�r�ir�. VV� ��ti�ip�t� �h�t th� �if� �i91 b� d���d�q�d by r�rn�ving �9�� ��o�tar�g ��Bl�l�r° t��v�r �ri� �quapr��nt and ��n���°uetir�� th� r��v� r�61�1�r �ti�ity equ�prr��r�� �t �r ne�� exi�ting grad�. Zo �h� propo��d �eoY�la�° ��w�r i� ������c� t� ����d appr�xim�t�9y s���r��y (70) fee� �b�v� fini�h�d c�r�de �I�v�tic�� �r�� i� a�s�m�d t� �� �upport�d �� �i�h�r a ��r��re�e m�t f�tar�d��i�r� or � `"��10��1��ks �r�ca" �tyle f��r�d�ti�r� �y�tema l°h� ��uiprr�en� �tor�g� �re� es ��s�rr��d t� b� supp�r�ed on ��h�il�w r��t sl�b fio�s�d�ti�n sy���me If n����s�rry th� e�nafi fiound��oon ��y ir�t�r��ce with ��is�c�r� fi�undati�n �I�rn��� t� �e9p r��is� wir�� �nd/�r ��i�mic ��a�ti���. 3a �tr�a�t�r�e �s���id�r�ti�n� �r� �rc��id�� ��r m�xar��arn �����Gra�r be�r�ng ���� 9 k��t�r��r� 10� kips per sc���r� f�a�t �c�d 2a25 ki�� ��r �qu�re �o�ta �f ���a�l ����� v��y �iy�i�c�nt9y fre�� �h��� ����rr��d I��ds, �e��o� �eot��P��i��6 �n�, �h��9d be �otife�J �s r���v�l��fioon �f �h� r���r�met�dati�n� �e�nk�ir���i herei� rr��y b� ��q�arr��a � �� o� ��d � e �� ��� Th� ��rp��� �f fY�� g���ech����� �r���s�i����o� �h�t 6�� i�� thi� r�por� �v�� �� �v���i�t� �9�� ��i9 c���itic�r�� �f ���e �a�� v�o�6� c���a��fi �� t�� ���p�s�� developr��r��, l�h��� ��r�dafiion� i��9�.ac�� ���f��� ��� ��a���arf��� ��el �yp��, �xp�n�i�� ����r��i�G, s�t�l���e�� ��t�nti�6, b��ri�� �����sty, �r�� pr���r��� �� ����r��� �f sub��r�ac� ���t�r�a �Mt�� scop� �� ��ar w��k �r��l�d�da �.o �2�c�r���i���r��� o� th� �it�a �� Dri�lin�, ���p9�r�r� �r�� ��q�in� �fi ���� (�.) bori�� �� ir�����ic���� ��►1� �►�c� c�r��r�dv���er �c�r�di�ic�r�s, 3, �abo�°at�� ���ti�g �f ��i� ��r����� �abt�ir��d �r�r� 5�����rf��� �xp9�r��ior� �c� r��t���i�►� th�i�° �hy�ic�� ��� ����r,��rir�g �rc���r�i��m 4� ������h�i��6 ���oy�as �� fih� c��t� ��t�in��s �a Caa���aGt�c��r� �v6th �wne�° rr������r�t��i�es ���d ���i�r� �r�����i�����„ 60 ����ar��;ic�r� �� �i�os r�����P C,'����ir�e� ir� ��� r����t �ar�o �o �)i���s�i�n� �� I�c;�� �c��l ��r� �r��r�d�nJ����� �w���is���r��� �„ F2���a9�� �f I��c�����r� ��� i���� �����o � 57 � ���004�9 F����a�r� 2�, �d�� 30 �.��r�9��ic��� ��� ������r������i�r�� ��r��6����g �� �a�� �r�c�i�� ��� ����actt�r�l �e�i�r�m � �t ��� � a TF�� �i�� �� i�h� �a�������1 ��������n��t a� I������ e�9����ay �r��� �� ��4�� R�nch� ���� �IofE �i�e, o� t�� �ity o� C'�a��rti��, ��Is�o��i�, �i�h �h� �p�ar�xirr���� g�c�g����ioe;�0 ���r���ir��f�� �7°�, �� �7��� ��� �, �� ��� �� S�� ���� Vi�,��1s�y P�a� an Aq��r�dix A� 2, Th� �a�� li�� ir� �h� f��thals� a���� th� rr�aeg�n �f �h� ���t� C�9�r� V�Iley �nd �h� �ar�t� �;ru� Mou�t�inso ��p�g�aphoc�lly, th� si�e i� r�9atively N���� ��a� c�n�i�t� of s��� �xis�ir�g e�mrr��ni�a�i�r�� �quipm�nt t� �� r��oc���d, A p�rti�n �f th� exisfiing �N117 �6o�k �r�e� is to b� r�rr��v�d �r�d r��r�����n ��v�lu�fii�n of th� s�ab��arf��� indic�t�s th�t ��i�� are g�n�r�9wy ���npc���d o� silt�y el�yey �and� with gr��v�l �nd�rlai� by d�r��e m�d�tor��a � l°h� �i�e a� id�r�tifi�d o� the �����gi� M�p by �r�b� �r�c� ��her� (2000) �� ��in� ����rl�ir� by bedrock �f �h� mo�9d9e Mioc�n� ���d M�nterey ��r�m�t�a�na ��i� �I�r�t�r�y ��crnatoo� �� d���r�b�d �� g�°�yi�hm�r�w� �r�� br°��c�i�h�E�9��k �¢� v�ry ��0� �ar��ge �nd vvhit�, �or�e9�ne��a� �h�9� �it� cher�, ��r�el�����as r�►�ar��tc���, ir�pu�� di�torr�st�, ��I��reo�� �6�y���r��, �r�d witi� s�ro�60 �rr���n� �fi �ilt�tone ��d ���cJ���n� n��r �he b�s�n � l"h� �it� 6i�s wo�hin th� �o��t ���y�� �e�rn��phi� �r�vi��e, �hach i� � ��ri�� c�� m��r���in r��y�� ��d v�l��y� �h�'� tr��d n�r�h����� sub p��°�Id�l t� th� ���� Anr�r��� ���5� (�,�e�a, 200�), � �oi9� e��o�nt�r�� �t �ppr�xirnat� �����i�g c��pt��� �h���d �� �9��s��ed �� �it� �I���ific��i�r� �) i� ����ar��at��� we�h �h� I���G �t�o9dmr�� �c���. ��xp�r��i�r� det�rr��r���a�n i��s��te� th�� th� t���ri�1� ��il� I�� �� �E�� e����" r�r�g�a � ����h�� c���ur�d��fi�r o��� �r���a�r���re� �t � �1���F� ��' ��������r� ���) �� r�in�t��� (2.�) ���� b�s�w �xastar�g grad�„ �� �t���l� �� ���;�d �I��� �r��and�r���r ��c�vatri�� ���y ��uct��t� d� �:� ��ir�f�l9 ��d ��he�° a��kr���vr� ���fi�r�d ������e� ������ � This p�r�i�a�� �� ��9if�arr�i� i� ��a���s��: �� �i��i�i��nt ����r�i� h���r�� fr�r� rr�����r�t� �c� ��r�� ��r��i������ ������m ������r�� �h��k��� r°����Iti�� fr�arr� ���h���4« � as �N� �ari���°� ������o�: � �� tP�� �r�a���� �i��e �r���� clis������r���� r�scal�e�q ����� �il��al�ir�� �� � ������i�l i�az���d ��: a�r r���� ����Bt�O � 58 �-1�1Q��9 F�br����� 2�� �0�1 � Ti�� ��n �ric�r��� E��9t �c��� e� � r����r° ��is�x�i� 9�����d i� ��I'sf�r�a�� �°h� ���.��� r��rk� �h� b��s�s��r� be���� ��� P�cof� P���� �� fih� v���t ��d �F�� 6���h A���ri��� �I��� t� t�� ��s�a ���Gt �c.�i��ty a� ������� b� �i�� ���ifii� ���t� �li�apsr�g ���r�c� �h� b��r���r�, i� � r��a���v��t �o����i�r�� ���vv��r� t��� �+a� �9�t�s, �9�ciy ����I�� ���9� ����j�h fr�� ���c� ��i� �h� ��r� �r��re�� ���aE� 7c���a � TF�� ���� �o�� n�� li� �i�F�o� �c� Ea�th���k� ����� .7_.c��� ������ifoed c�r� � ����� e�� ��li���°ni� ��r�hq��k� F��&t ��r�� i��p (�t���r�di�), h��u���� �h� �ity ��� �;�ap�r�ir�c� ha� ad�n�ifi�� ��� �it� a� t��or�r� I��at�d ���� �r�� Mor��� Vi���� �h�n��n F���et ��r�� (A�pe��ix)a ��@�e Mont� Vi�t�m5h�nn�n ���It i� � L�t� Qu�t��n�� ���iv� anc� ����ib9y Holo��n� ���iv�, �c��fihwest dippir�� reve�°s� �c� r�verse0dextr�l c�b&iq�� �lip fa�alt th�� �c�rrr�s the Sota�ht���t�r� 5�nt� �I��� V�Iley thrus� b�lt, vvhsch i� g�r�er�lEy loc���d alc�rig the foothills of the �orth-���t�rr� Sa�t� C'r�z Nlount�an�o Thi� thr�st �y�t�r� h��s been c���crib�� as an ��stvv�rd prop�gating h�lf fl�w�r �tr�ct�r� �h�� r��ts tc�v��rd tP�e Sar� Andreas f�ult z�n� (�ry�nf, 2000)a Th� Mc�n�� !/i�t�G�h�n�c�r� ��u9fi of��ets s�c�i�ro��a� o� th� PIi���r��wPlei�t����� �an�� �9�r� �or��toc��e �o����car�� p���, �f �I�� fi���t �or�� �r� �r�r�c��led by �9�G���n� �I��aviume � Th� �i�� 8i�� �r' � vved�� �f �Ic���terey Fe�r���io� bedr��k �v�r8�ir� by Q��t�r��r�/Pl�ist���r�� �gec� �Ili�e�i�6 ��r� ci�p�ss�s ir� b�twee� � s���y ��r�c� �9�e �r►�ir� �r��� �� th� Mon�� Vi�t���h��no� ���6t (���io��� ��olr�c�s� M�q ��p��dox), �a��d �� ���iB��le �e�9��n� ����, ���ifcar�i� ���ter��ry F��I� M�ps �n� ����le ��r�h irn��e�� �h� r���i� tra�� �af �h� ���I� �� tl���t�� ���r�acirn����y ��t� ���t r���th���t �vhi�� th� �pi�y �� �h� ��uE� i� ������a�a�n��ely :1��� f��� ��uth���� o� tB�� ������a��� �e�l���r t�w�ro � F���9� �I���s� �r� �h� �r����t �i��, �vhi�l� w��ald r���t ��F��� �r���as��� �r�jec� ���i�i�i�� a ���r�� ��wv� ���a9� �p����e���e �e�4,��aa�,� QR��a�) ��������� E�� �i���� �6 a�����r��� ���. �a� ���n�� ��� ����•��� ���a6� ��a� �m� � 59 F��a�429 F�b��a��y ��, �0�1 � a E��h�u�k�mind�ac�e� �ibr��fa���� ��� k�� ���� ���a�� �� ��v���G �uc���i�i���� ph���m���, i�cB�di�� 6�q�a�f���i�� i� fi�� �a�ad� ��� sil�y ��r���. Liq������o� ���s�u�#� �r� � ����I�t� 9��� of 9�r°�r���h ��ei ��n ���as� ���l�c��r�� f� s���� �r ���� �a���:��°� m� i� ��,��r� on ��� f��arer°�y ��r��a �f �i���fi������ ��e��r� k������f� ��c��in� �e°���� � �����r��r��n k���rr� �� ������I �����di�� ��n �c���re �i��e����ic��i is t��i��lAy �o�i��d �� ���� ����r �� ��e� �f t6�� s�a����f��� ��al� ��d �� ���9� �E��t ���� � r��at�v� d���it� �� ���� tl��� �'��'/oa �, ���e�i �� r�e�ti���y I��e@ ��p��r��h� th� r���� ��rf��� �I�y�y ��il ���c�iti���, �r��i ��oder�t�sy ����� ���9s ov�rdyin� b�c�rz�ek, i� s� ��r� a�ine�r� �hafi the resk �f �iqu�f���i�n, D���ra6 �pr��dang ��d ��hh�� ��i�mical9y i�d�a��d ��ar�a�� ��r�ife�t�tic�r�� i� Ir�w �� �he prc�j��� �it�e • s�i � �� � � �, The �i�� tc�q��r�p��y �r�� expo��d ��il� type� i�di�a�� �t�o�t �he po�e���al fcar Y�ndslid�� i� rnir�ir��E �� thi� �if�e �e�r�h�rrnc�r�, �� evide�ce �f pr��ri�u� I�nd�lid�s w�� �bserv�d �� tl�� si��a � ��i�rir�i� ���r� ��r�c�itio��s �he ��I�o��r�g ��tima��� c��~��an� r��ti�� ��r����ter� h�v� b���1 ����blo�hed u�i�g �h� rn��h�d� �u�lir�e� in �h� �C�1� ��9if�rni� ��ildir�g Code �ro�h r�f�r��r� �� �h�� ���el�r��i�r� �r�����r r��p� pr°�vfd�� k�y �h� lJaSo C���O�c�oc�@ �i�r��� (�9��5) ��d the ��f.ic�n�9 ��a��i� F-����r� M�ppir�g �e°�a��� (f�S�MP), I"h��� ��°t��nd m�ati�n ��r�r��t��� ��pr����t tM� f��xim�_a� ���si�9�r�d ��r�hquak� (��;�) sp��t��4 �e��on�� �� ��i�rni� e��r��� ������i��cir�� 5 p�r���� ��mp�� ����I�r��i�r� �n� h�vsng � 2 p�r�;er�t �r�b�&�sli�yy �f ex���d���� v�o�her� � �U y��r p�riode —_ � �. ��A�� ��� ��I �� �� � e6s �� �����t �� _ ._______ --- -- � �t�� __ �� _� _ �_ w. �_.._ � _.�_ � �it� �I�s� � �h�rt �ei°i�d �p���r��9 ����6�r��i�n, � �o�l� .�.�s��:�r�� ��rs�� �p�e��°�9 a��������ti��, �� ���9� �h��� p�ri�� �it� �.c��ffs�p�c��, �� � ao�Q � ����a�c1 ��r��� �i�� ���f��i�c�t, � � a ��(� A�j�.������ �ri�ar�t ��re�� �p�e;����1 ��c;�l�r�'�io� �ms �0�7� ��9j����� �� ����r�r�e� ���i�d �p�c�r��l ��:��G�r���c�r�, ���� � 034� ��i��� ��ri�d ��ss�r� ��a��fr�a� �c��6�r��i�n, �os �a�a�� � �- �����d ���i�a� ���i�� �����r�9 ����9����ior�, �o� �e�9� � 60 ����o��� F������y �� �o�. �. Th� �i�� �� s�ai���l� f��� �Itl�� p�op���c� ���v�6��m���� ����rr� � �����c�i�i��� ���i��€�ri�� ���r�c���i�fi �r���d�d ���� �°ee��������i��� �����i���� �����`s�� �r� prc���r�By i�p9�nn��t�d a�f� th� p�°oj���� � ���°a� r� 6 � � , �r�dirig, �� � m�na�r°o�r�, �h��Od �e���'��r� t� Ch����� ��, �r�c� ��y �ddition�� �o�a99y ��pra��c� a�p��di��� �°eBat�ng �� �r�����y� o� �h� ����1 C;�6if�rP�c� �ui9�i�g �od�o �o �t�� �xi�ting gr��nd surf�ce �h��lc� �� ir�iti�lly p�°���r�d fc�r �r�dir�g by re�ovin� �SI ��g�f�tior�, tre�� lar�� r�o�, d�bri�, �o�Pc�r�plyar�g �II �r�d �wl �f��r r�rg�nic rn�t�ria�q 1l�ic�� cr�at�d by r�rr��val �f st��h croaf�ri�l s���sld not b� b��kf°ill�d �r�les� �h� ur���rlyin� �oil� h��� b��r� �b�er��d by a r�pr�s�nfative �� �hi� firmn a � o f II x v ti r�� �� t�� � s� � y� � �° �ent t�v f � �s �ir ri r° � ro� ���n �� 1���� ��Im 40 �i01 and back�l9 pE���d �t ne�r c�ptir�urr� c�oi�tur� ir� 9�y�� with �oo�e thickne�s n�f� gr��t�r th�n �ight (f�) i��he� �h���d k�� ��rr�p��te� �o � mi�irn�r°n �g �U�/o �f m�xim�� dry ��r�sity obt�ir���9� �y �h� A f� C� ��5� ���1 M�fh�c�, �w �r����� ��il� us�d t� �°�i�� sit� �r�ade ��o�Od b� ����� fio or b��t�� �h�� c�r�� sat� ��ils ir� ��reng�h� �xp�r��io� �r�d ����re��ibi�ity ch�r��fi�ri�fa�s. T�r�p�rt �oss� ��n b� ���B��ted, b�� �va99 ��t be �r���u��ifi�� by �h� g�o���h�i��9 �n�ir���eira� firc�a Fi��9 �rar�rr�ents can ti�� �B��r��t�ri�t��� �f th� i�p�r� s�ails will �e ��e�°�d �f��r th� rrn�t�rsa9 i� �� �h� proje�� �ot�� �� �e�e�f �9r�ir�i��g �y�ter�� sh�tal�1 k�� ���i�n�d �o �h�� v�r�t��° �� ��f: �i��h�rg��i ����� ta��rang ��i�� �� �a��r ��r�et����� �o �An�l �it� qr��� sh��9d b� ���h �i��� ��I w�te� as �aa�r�m�ra�r�t6y d�v��;�r� ���y fr�r�� th� ��r���r�: ��d i� ��� a91ow�� t� p���o Th� g����P,� ar�nnedi�fiely adj����t k� t��� bu�ldir�� �h�91 �� �I���d �°IQ f�r ��n�r�i���� �f ��n (1�) f��� �ri��s�r�ed ��r��r��i�u9�r t� kh� f��� �� th� �v�l�a �II �iv�r��� �e+�t�r a� t� b� �6r��:k�d �� �� ���,r����� �r�ir����� A9f�r�r�ati�� c�radin� m�th�d� ��r� b� f�ur�d in �4�aG�a 5���son :��Q�a�. �o �� �h��al� �� �oi�d �;h�� �aw�i�c�rr� ���9 � ��������� ��r�di�i�� �� ����r�d �N�� perir�et��$ �f �h� �tr���t�re �vi�E h�Gp ��������� �h� ��t�n�i�l ��� �i�Fer�nti�l svv��ling ���d �����i�g �����i�t��i �vi�� exg�ar�s��� ��i@�, ���fim�����c�a�ti��� ��r� �;h���d �� ��{���� tc� er���� �������rr�1 S�rd���pi�� �r�� a�ri���i�'� �c�l�a�i��s �h�� �� ��o� �In�� f�r �r�q��r�� �h����� ir� �c�i0 ������a�� �;�r�t�r�� �r irr���l�� ��a�9ic��a�r� �fi �rafi�� �r�i,��c� �6�� ��ri�e���r c�f f�Fi� �tru�t�r�o �a T9�� ����� r�f���r1��� �i�� dr�ir���� ��r�di�a��� �h��6�1 b� r�1��nt�ir���� ���� fr�� ����s� �f th� 9if� �� tf�� ��e°�a�������e �rc��a�r �c�r�� ��ri� p���rrr��r��� �� th� fca��d��s�ar� ar1c� �t��ldi�� ��e� r��y �� �c�m�a��a�r�is�� i� �h� ��rr�a���dir�� �i�� dr�i���� ��d gr�diri� i� �d��c���� r��difi�da �� 61 ���100��� ���ru�ry �� �O�.f 1�0 �� �s ��c���e���d th�t �����r� �e����hr�i���, I��a I�� ����i��� �� �ar��id� ir��er�itt��t ���t����r�i��� ��gin��r��i� ��r�a��s ���°ir�� �a�� ��v�6��r�����, �r��1i�c� �n� �����d�tfi�� ����tr���i�r� ph���s �� th� �v�r� �� o��e�r� ��mp9i�r��� �vi�h th� d�ssc�r� �c�r���p��p ��ecifia��ti��� ����i �����rir����a���n �, �r�� �� �190� ���ac�� �h����s a� �f�� ����� �hat ��b��arfa�� �����iti�ar�� di��r fr�� �t�o�e �nfo������c� �ari�r �� th� ���r� c�f � ��r�stru�tiono �.1� ��lar�� �n� sp��i�i�ati�r�� �ho�9d �� �rc��id�c� �� ������r ��c�te�hc�i���� I��:a p��i�r tc� gradir��e Pl��s �hould i��lud� �h� c�r�dir�g plan� �r�d f�un��tiorr ����il�e �tr��tur�E I���s sh�uld b� sho�vr� �� �h� fc��nc3�tio� pl�n�a �.`L, 5hou9d ��ils b��or�� u��tabl� d�rir�c� �r�ding d�� �� �x��ssive �ub��r���� rnoi�t�r�, �It�rr��tive� �� ��r�°��� ir��tability rn�y ir��lude aerati�� �� fh� u�� of grav�l� ��d/or g��t��il�� �� �t�bi0a�ir�� �e���re�, F�ecornm�n�a�ir�n� fe�r s�abiliz�ti�n �h�uOd b� provid�� �� thi� fisrrn �� n��d�d d�arin� �o�sfructiona � ��� ev��o n� � r ir� �� �o�n �� � x��� t� n� n �I ��I 1 �k �r° o��� �� �� �o� �tio�� � a �ue t� �he �°�9�t���ly �F��Ilow d�pth �f c�r���d���er ��� �r� �rd�r �o pr�erid� � ��� �f ��r� predi�ta�9� �i�� irn��°ov�rn��f �ro� �o��d��i�� re�omrn�nd��ic�n�� �h� rrr���op�l� �tr��t�are rnay �� sup�aar�ed on a��II Ql�ck ��yl� �r��r��r��a����r�� m�t fi��r�d�t9on sy���r��. �fi �ho�ld b� ��t�� �h�� ����� ��r���r�i�t� �t �hes ���i��9��° pr�j��t �ot� r�ay 9irr�i� f,h� v��k�i9ai� r�� ��t�r���r� C�IY �Eo�k �tyle F��nd��i�no �f the �fir����ar�9 r���ic�� 9��d� �x��ed th� c;ap��o�y �� � �e91 �I��k ��yl� ���ndati�n, � ��� f��nd��i�n vvi�h c�����r��� ��Y���r� �i�r°� �� ��r�� ��rc��r ��y �� �a5�c� to ����c�r�, t6�� �t����t�r�e �o ��e to th� ��t►ar�t�� sub��s¢���� ��w6 ����i�i���, �v�r� �x��vati�� �nc� r��carn����6�n �f ��i9� i� �he fc��ar���ti�� �r�� wel� �� r��c���a�y t� ���c�vi�� � I���li��d d�n�� ¢���� �f ��i9 t� ��,c�pc�rt �h� prop���d f��P����ic�r�, t� d��r�a�� th� ��t�nti�l f�i° dif��r�����9 ��til���n�n� �r��i �� p'°�va�� ����� �a¢�if�rrr� k���ring c�nditi��►�o ��i9� �t�o�G� k�� ���r����v���c� t� � d���h z�� t��r�e (�� f��� b���w t�e �o��m �f �h� ���s�,��ti�r� �r f��� (�j ��et b�l��v �xi�tin� �e�d�, �r�ji�h�v�r� i� �r��t�ra `Th� �v�r��x��v��i�n �h�ul� ���r�c� �c� � �i�t��r�� �f� thr�� (�) ���� ��y�i��1 �h� f��nd��ic�n ��ro����ere �h� r����l�a�� �L�r���� �F��t�lc� h� ���rif��c� �� � d��i�t� �� �a�� (�) �c���, �c�����r� �����ii�i�r��� �r�� ���p�����i t� ��°Id �f rr1��a��m dry �l�rt�it� b����� �°�ps��i��g �6�s� r�r��i���� e�� ���� �r��ri�a��9y ���rr�ca��d �i����°i�s i� �:hi� 6if��o �I�� r�pl���d r���:�ro�� is kca �� ��s��:�arQ ��r,c�iti���� ���d ����ar������� �� 95�'/� �af ���i���°� ��y ��n�i�o 7 62 �m��o��� ��b��a�y �� �n�� �o �E � ���I ���ck sys��r� As ��t ���f��ient �� ��p��� �h� ������I� t�a��r ���d ���c�m��s on �he �v�i6�ble �o��c��ti�r�� ����pr�n�, � ��r�v�nfi��n�� r�°��t �6�6 ���anc��t��� i� c��n����tic�n �vit�� c�ri�9�a �i�r� f�����t��� �6����� r��y k7� i���r��r�t�c� s�i�� ��� ������� c���ie��o ����d�ti�� ������ ��y ����� �� n����� tc� ���is� the �fir����r�9 I��d �°����i����a Plli��r����, ��� to �h� �ha91n� qr����d��t�r ��o�����:���� �� a�pr�c��i����ly� ����a�t��� ta �or��t��� (��'�1�) F��� b�ecauv �xist�n� ����9�, ���r�dati�� �i�r� �h��s�d b� c���i�r�ed a� sh�9b�vv �s p���i��� �r sh��ld b� insta9l�cl with �� �i�� �o pr��ect �g�in�t �I�� ir�fsuer�c� �f ��r��r�dwat�r d�ar���� �ier ir��t�Al�to�ar�e _ u� nt h��� r� �° �n � x v ti t��° 4a �ec�rn�a�ti�n �f th� ��r�ac� ��i�� ir� th� �qr�ipr�er�t sh�lt�r ���ildo�g �re� will b� r����s��ry to d�cr�as� the pot�ntial f�r di�er�nti�l s�t�l�r�er�t and t� provide ra�c�r� �ani��r� bearir�g �c��di�ion�m S�ils �h�uOd be �carif�d ��� (1) f��t k�eG�� �he bot�orn �f the prop���d rr1�� �labd Th� r��ultir�g �urF��� �h��l� be rr�osst�ar� c�r�difiion�d b�for� �°e�ompa��ing th� �ur�ace r����ri�E �0 95% �f m�xir�urn dr� d�r�sa�o Th� i�ot�r�� o� th�s� re��rnr�er�d��i��� is t� pr�vide �ans���°rr19y �arrn r��ca�p���ed �oil� b���� the equapr���t �I�� ��°��a ��r � � �n � en ti �s0 �. Fc��nd��or��� for th� m�r�o��l� ��vverr �r�d �c��apme�t �h�l��r ��y be �x����t�� �� bear intc� �h� r���i�e rnat�ri�l, t� depths �s s���if�c� by th� ��ru�ur�l d��i���r, �� �uppc��t �h� �r��aiprr�e�fi �tr��urr� �r�d �� r°e�i�� �ny ��fi�c� o� Yh� �x��r��i�e �oo�o 6a x v���o�� ��� — Ar�y �x������d mat�ri�l gr�r� fr���dati�� ��� ��p�o� �r c�Pp�wr��g� �ys�er�� She��9� �� pr�p��°ly r���rr�p�ct�d i� �����°�i�r��e wi�h �91 �ri� r�c�r�rn�r�cJ��d�n� f�r e��in��r�c� fi9L ADt��°n��i�r�Oy ex�av���� ��06 r��y 6� h�tal�� �f� �i�� �h�n �����af� pl���r���� �r�� a� n�fi �v�il�bE� �t �h� pr�j��� I�c�t��no �a �r��s �ut�i�� �h� b�+ildi�� ar�� �� r���i�� �i�l, �ac���i�� �I�b�����gr���, �id�w�ek� �ri� ��vs�g sh��ald ka� �v��excav�t�d �c� � ���th �f ��� (1) ����o T6�� �x����d �u�a�� �h��Od b� �e��r i���i, ������ar�� ���c�o�i�n�d ��c� r���r����k�d a �o �r���it� ��is� r��y �� �a��� f�r fi�E �r��� th�y �r� ��e���� �f �99 �c°q��i� r��teroa6� r���, ��briy ��� s��r����s�6� �����s�9 9�����r �h�ra �i��f (�) i'��h��a �a �Iti��ugh n�t �r����ar�t��°�d in c��ar �c��i���� �h���ld �r�y tr��i�, d�h�rr�� ��° ��at���arf��� ��ru���ar�� �a� �n���ar�t�r�� ��_�r�A��� e�r�dir�g� �°�rr��v�l� �r�9� b� r����sJ�t°y t;c� ����ta��� d�pth� �r�d ��ri��n��l �imi�� a� r�c�r���r���� �y this girm �� �h� '�i�� �� �r�di�oge � 63 ���.�0��� ���6����� ��� �0�� �d, �r�dir�g ir��p���i��� �h�l� �� p���rr�ed s� ����r��nr� vu��6� tf�� �U�U � T�bo� � 7�4,70 ��� ����ndix � f�r pr�j��� ���°�i�� ���ding o����°���i�r� r�q�or�r����s � i�� �v ��� ��� •� �� ������ ��� � o A�� P�i�l�i�� ��a��n� �a��9 ����tr��:i�� �� f��l �I���s ������c2 ��r���r� �� �h� r�ir�i¢��rr� �t��d�rd� Qi�t�� i� �h�p��e 1� �� t�� �;�9i��rni� ��i9�i�� �.�c��o �� is r�����r�en��d th�t ���pr����t�giv� o� �f�s ��ir���� r��vA�� fihe gr����g �oan� pr��r �� �r�di��� ��d �ot� d���l�p���ta 2o Fi01 �Ic�p�s �����Id b� k�y�� and 6�r����c� ���t� fr�r i������1 �rc���'� �v��� �he ��i�ti�� sle�p� to r��eiv� f9� i� lflo1, E�oriz��t�l �� �rer�ic�9, or° �t��p�r� �he k�y� sho�Ed b� tilt�d into �h� �lop�, �h��ld be � r�inirr��a� �f �rr1� �quiprr���� width �rid�, �r�d �hou�d ���r�� � �inorn��r� �f �hr�� (3) f��� deep �� th� o�t�id� �dge, 3a �ill �lop�s sh�uld b� o��rfi91��, c�r�pa�t.�� �r�� c�t b��k f� pl��r��� configur�tic�n�. �Y ho� will yi�9� b�tfier c�rnp��i�r� �n th� �Ic�p� f���s th�� oth�r ��thod�a 4, Li��d dr�i��ge �w�9�� �nd d��rr� r�r��ir�s s�o�9� b� �r��id�d a� the top� �f �19 �ut a�d fill �Ic�p�� �o div�r°t dr�ir��c�. � �vvv�y �r�cn ��� �I�pe �ac�sa �� �L�t �nd �91 �E�p�� ���o�ld r��� b� ��r��fir�c�e� �t����r �h�� 20 � (h��������� to v�s�i��l)o S��b��k� �f s�r�c:t�res �rorr� ss���� ��ou�d b� �x��dr���i�e� �� p�r th� �a�3,C. � ° � vel e��� � t�0� �'� r��� � � a UteOity tr�nch b��kfo61 s�ou0d b� �c�v�rr���l by th� �rlleavi���r�� �fi �h�� r�p�r� r���ting t� c�inirn�r� cornpac�a�n �t�r�d�rd�o �� c��r��r�l� s��9c� �6�►�� in�id� �f th� �r�p��ty 9i��� cr��y �� b��kfiss�� �vifh ��trv� �c�i9� ��� ��rr�p��t�d �� � r�inirn�ar� c�f ��% o� r��xarn�ar� �ry d�nsi�ya ���kfil� �� ��f���� ��re�o�� 9fn�� wi6� be ��a���;�t �c� fih� ����o�i���i��� �f �h� �e�ri�di��i�r��� ���r��y �ar thi� �����, ��i������ s� �c��°� ��ri���n�. �� � r��r�s�ri���iv� �� �hi� �irr� i� t� r��r�et�e ��r��Gi�r��°� wit� th��� r���r�r�e�d�fiio��� � ��� � u�°�� ��� � __ ���o_ � r��l���i ��� � r��d �i��� �.o T��� pr�pc��ed �q�ai��r��r�t �he�ter �aa� f��ar�d�ti�n ��y b� s���c�r��d �n ��il� pr���r�d �� r�cornm�r���� ��rs��r in thi� r����t �n� ��y �a�� � d��i�n b��ri�� �r����ar� �f 1500 ps�,� �e ��P��e rrr��r�opc�e� t�vu�r °'��99 �9��k°' �ar ��r��r�t� c�°o�� f��r����o�r� sys��r� �h�d��� �� �u����e� �� ��i9� prep���� �s r���r���r���c� ��r6i�� ir� �h9� r�p�� �r�� ��y ��� � d��i�n h��r��� �r�ss��� �f �2�� p��a 3, �� ���n��n�i�ar��O ��r�c.r�t� r���� sl�b i���an��ti�r� d��i�r� i� �a��d �ta ��app�� ��� ��r��tta���, �h� ��rt�c��d9�9 ���sr���r i� �� d�si�� t��� fi��ar���tic�r� ��� �����ca�������� �� �p�� �r� ��s��i��v�r ���� � rr�i��a��ar� h�ri��r���� �i�t��c� �� t6�r�� �3) �����. � rri���9�a� �� ����r�c�� �������r� (6�0�) �f 2�a �r;i ��� � r���cir�e�r� ���rs��� �����;i�yy ��r c���d ��� �i�� �r���:l� �fi� ���f� �a�� ���c��ld b� �s�� ir� th� ���r� �a� ���s�i� f��a��i�tir�� d��agn pr�r��s�o ��r �G���r��r�� � 64 �m������ ��bea�ar� ��� ��1� ��nr�����, r��� ���an��tior�� �r� ex��c,���i �� b� � �or�o��� �f f�el�r� (1�.) i��l��s �hi�k ���h � r�i�ir��a� o� �b�rv� (2) �.� ��r rr�ai�, �nrith �r�� (1� r��t ��t �� �h� ��p ��� �r�� (1) rn�� ��t �� ��� b��e�r�o �f ���� �I�b ����A���a��� �e��¢c�na �a �19 �h��lsoa� ����¢��9��i���� ���o��� ���� �r�toQ°��y ir��� �ir�r� r���r�p����� ��ai9� �s ��s�ri��d ��r�0�r a� �hi� r���rtn ��auri��ta��� ��� ���a�c��d �� ���r�� � ���oriomu� �f ��8v� (1�) i����� b�lc�� i�a�v��� ������r�� c�r��ee �a T� � r��t f��¢n��teo� i� i����ici�r�� t� ���dep�n��r��Gy ��p��r� �h� m�r�opoG� t�w�r loacl r��c�io�� th�r� �ri�l�c� �o���� ��y be a�cor�o�a��� i��o th� ��si�� �f t�� f���c��t�or�, �o I�ri91�� �ier� r��y �� ���igr�ed a�si¢�� � �kin �rs��i�� �����i�yy c�� 650 p�f with n� �61��v�n�� fi�r end ���ring c��diti�r�so A r�presen��tiv� c�f thi� firrr� sh�uld b� r��ti��d � t�ir�i��rr� o� ��v�nt�P.�v� (72) h��ar� �rri��° �� drilli�� �perations t� provid� in�p���i�n s��i���. �a °�he aapp�r �n� (1) fa�t of rnat�r�i�) �h�uld be ��gl��t�� e� �he driol�� �i�r desigr� pr�c���� ��d th� tc�tal �nnbedr��r�� d�p�h sh�u9d b� d�t��r�ir��d by th� pr�j�� ��ruc�u�°�I �ngir���r and �h�uld �o�ed �n th� f�ur�d�ts�r� p9�n�o �e A pa��iv� pr��su�� �f 30� p�f ��� b� ls��d ��� �h� �ar���r�ying �oodo �. A coeff�i��� raf �r��ka�r� ofi Oo�� �n�y �e �ppl��d t� d��� ���d for���u T��s d��� ��t en�lucJ� � f�cto� �f ��f��ye 100 °��9�r�r�c°� f��° �O9 d�ill�� ���r� �houl� �� wi�h�� l�% �f �9�a��a �G9 ����r��� pl�ced en �he c�r�i9p�� pi�r �ha shc��alc� b� �d�q�aat�@y vi�r�t�c�. � �a �rounde�a�er ��� �c����r�t�r�d at ����nt��r� t� no��t��n (17mi�j �eet �elow exi�tin� �r�d�, �x�a��ti�n ���ir�� �ri�l b� �°�c��air�c3 i� drael�� qi�r� ��enc� ���ca �r �fir�uc�h th� ������vv���� @e�✓�9� � 2e C�ving o� p���ibl� a� tl�� ���a�r �ear�� �f th� �ril9�c� �iers b�t os ne�� lik�lyo �h���6c� ��v�r�� oc����, ��r��or�t�y c��er�� vyi�l b� ��q��i��c� �� c�r609 ��d ��r��tr�ct th� �s���. �30 �ontin���� �p��s�� i���p���ic,n �� r�q�air�d ��� �rsl9�d pi�r ex��v�ti��� p�r �AQ7 (:�� ��b9� �,7��o9e �40 �I�� ��e ��fl7 ��� ��ble 170�e�� f�r �r�aje�� ����ifi� �c�r��r�te pqa������ ����i�l ir��p��tion r�q�i���m���. �.�e 1�19��v��9� b��ri�� �a����� �re ��t (vv�i�h►� �f �oo�ir�� �r��l �r�iO� �ur���r�� rn�y �� ��y9��t��) �n� ���� ��p6i��bw� ���� ���d �9�� �������f�9�; Di�� 6��d�a �6, ���ro�� ������ ��y b� �n�r����� by car�e._�h�rr� �vh�� �r�t��i�r�� I��c�� ���:�� �� ��r�r� ���/or ��i�r�i�i� ��°� �r�c�rp�r���d i�t� d��ir�r�� ��in� �h� �S�ern�t� @��� ���r7bic��t�ons in �dl� �Q� 5��;�i�� ��O�o3a2o � 7P I,�t�r�G ���d� ¢��y �� �������cec� by �c�i9s ��i��i�r� �� �6a��r s0��s �r�d r��snt��f:i��� �r�� �� ����i�� r��i���r��� r�� �h� ��ai9� ��tir�g �r� f��an�������� ���r� v��Elsa L�t��°�� �:����:i�y s� b�s�� ��r� �h� � ����r�pti��� �h�fi ��y �°�q����� ���kfill ��j����� �� �r��������o��� �r1� c�r�a�� b��rr�� is pr���r9y ��r������d, � � (� ' 65 �m100��� ��b�c.��ry �II� ���1 4�0 ��rr��r�fi�n�l ��r�t�n����� ����i���� ��r ���i9dir7�� �rh�r� �h� ��c���d ��a�f��� �I���s �t ��e l r��ri����a� �� �����i��l� �� ������� s����ld t�� st����� �� �h�t ���h t�� ��r� ���k�rr� �r� ��v�9� 1�a ��o���r��r��r�� �f fi�oto�g� ��t���r��d an �oi9� ��� th�e °°a.r��'° �x����ior� r��n�� �i����d b� ���i���� b� tF�� ���j��� ��;ra���;����9 ����i���� �� �rc�����y re���t th� �ffe�t� �� tH� �x��r��i�� �c�i9 �r�c� t� �����r� �F�� i��t�r�d�d �t�ta���rea � a � �n �t��� � v�t���� �9� � se �� y � �� � �e ti � � � � � � t�� e�� �� ��o � �r� �x v ��o�� �t �� � �� � �i� r ��f ��e� �� �� � � �° �� � ��� ���I ��� n � li u �i�� � ent e���i �ra�� s �.� M�ximurra �xp���d ��t�l��en� �pp���ar��tely 3/� sr��h�� �re �nticip�t�� �or �hall�� fo��d��i�n� �nd f���r �9�b� desigr��� �� recor�m�r���do 2. Diff�r�r�ti�9 �ettler�er�t ��t�r��r� adj�c��� 9��d beari�g m�rr�b�r� �houl� b� I�s� �h�r� one-half �h� �c�t�l �e�tlem�r�ta �o ��h� r�ajority �f s�t�leme�t sh��ld oc�ur d�ars�g ��r�structi�nn Po�� �on�tr�a��i�n ��i�l�rr�e�t �h��a9� b� r�ir��r�ala �r�l�b, .��, �r°�yrr�e�°, �el�✓, a����r�e�, ���; ��f��, (��olo�ac m�� �r��i r��p d�t�b��� �f �h� ���� A��o 3�" X 6�` qu�d�°�ng9�� C��Sif�r�i�a lJ��, ���@��ic�� S�r��y f�is��E6�n�ota� �i�lc� �t���i�� �i�,p N9F��3�?, �o�a ��o�o�i��9 �ur��y, M�r�lo ���k, �Ao ���n�, �!�o, ���rrpil�r, ����, F��9t nur�b�r �6� P��r��� Va�����h��r��a� 3���9t ���� or� ����t�rr���y fa�e� ��� ���d ����ba�� of t8°�� o�J�it�� ����e�a �� C�e�G�����1 ������ �v�b�ite� ht��//�ar�f7����us���v/r� i�r��l/�fa�9� l/5°��, O�/i�c�, ���D�e�i� Fia�a�°ds ��i�^��� �;�r�t�r, l��i��d �t�tes ���a��c�i�al ���i��yp a� ���per�t9�n �ai�h ����f�rni� ���6�gi��l ����i�t� �����, v�uvwmc,���r����rd�d�a, �c,��� �v/�f�u9t�/��/C;�lif�rr�i��� L _ � �__ � _ __._ ..u�.._ �.�� �his �n���ar� o� b���� �r� ti�� �����pfii�r� tf��t �� �r��c�u�t� ������� �� ��r�i�c�ri��i� �nd testi�g �vi�9 �� ��r��rrr,�d b} �����rr� ����e��n6��1, Ir��o ��ri�� �e�il������ic�s� �ca e�h��k ����plian�� �vi�h �h� r�c�mr���d��i�r�� �ov�r� i� ���i� r�p��a Th� r�c��r���d�d ����� �r��4 �al��e���i�r�� ir��l�c��, ��� �r� r�c�� ri������r�iEy oirr7it�e� �� �h� ��Ilc�vvi�a�o �� l���r���v �� '�F�� b��i��ir�� ��� �r��dar�� pl��°�� ���r9��� �i1� ����i�r1 ph��� �� ��� pr�j���� �� 66 ���.�0�2� E������� �� ,�0�� �a ��s��r��ion �nd �esfi�� durin� �it� �r�p���ti��, �r�dan9, pl�ca�� �f ��g����r�d �i�9, �r�d f��a����o�n ��ns��°�c�fia��e �m �,c��������o�� �� �°e��a�r�� ��ri��� ��������a��i�r�a ,d � �,� � ..i �� ���9ys�s ���� r��e�r�e���dati��1� �ubr�etk�c� �� �ha� rr�p�r� �r� ����� m�� p��� �ap�� �f�� d�t� o6�ai��� fr�r� t6�� ��ring� d�°ille� �n sit�m ��� ��t�r� �nd ext�r�� �f ���i�tsrar�s b����n �r�d bey��c� �h� boreng� ��y �o� b��r�rr�e �vAC��nt ����i9 �on�tru��i�r�e Tfi �✓�rs�ti��� fh�� �pp��r� �veden�, a� rr��y b� �����s�ry �o ���� �v�luat� fihe recoc�m�������n� �f� th�� report. T�e ��c�q� �f �ur ��r�ric�s �id �o� ir�cl�d� �nviror��entai �����sm�r�� �r ��ol�c�i��9 studya Th� ��ope �f s��i�e� did n�� sr�eBud� inv��ti��ti�n f��° �6�� pr��ence or ����r��� �f �ret9�nds h���rd��a� c�r t�xic rr��t�ri�l� i� �h� ��il, ��rf��e v��ter, gr°o��dv��t�r or �iro Any �t�terr��nt� ir� �hi� re��r� �� on th� ��ol b�rin� O�gs ��g�rc�i�g �do�s, �a���sa��9 or ��sps�io�s ����s c�r ��ndi�i�r�� c�b�erved �r� �kri�tly f�r the ar��c�rrr��ti�r� of �the �li��ta �ir��ir�g� o� �hi� ������ ��°� ��I°sd �� c�f �hi� d�t�� �1c�vvee�es°, c�h��g�� �c� a c��adi�a�� o� � p�op�rty c:�� ���u�° �i�H g���s��e �f to�� wheth�r th��� b� e��a� �� ra�t��r�G proce�s�� c�r �r�rks �fi rr��r� �� �a��� or ad����r�� pr���e�i��A Yri �ddsti�n, �:�O�r���� �� �ppli��b9� �r �ppr�pri�t� �f�r�dard m�y ��c�r �h��9��r �h�y r�s�a6� fror� I�gi�O��i�n car t�road��ir�� kr��vvledg�o ��c�rdin�9y, findir��� ofi �hi� r�p�� rr��y t�� ir��r�Bi��t�d �vhc��Ey �r ��r�i�01y �y �:���r��e� c��a��i�9� ��ar �c�r�tr�so Th�r������ ���is r�g��� i� �ub���k tc� r�vsew an� �h��ald ���: k�� r��i�� �pc�r� ���r � p�ri�c� �� c�r�� (�) Y���-A �� t��� ev�r�� �h�� �r�y �t1�r�ges ir°� �F�� �����ar�, c�����r�, �r 6���toc�r� �� th� ������`ar� ��d �th�r ir����r�v�rr��r�ts �r� �I��n�c�� th� ��r��ou�i��� ��d ����r�r�o�r���tson� ��t���o��d i�� �hi� ���p�r� �t��91 r��ie 9�� �c�r��id���d ��li� ��I��� ih� �h�c�q�� ��c� ��vs�we� �r�� �����E��i�ns �f �r�i� r�por� r��ds��c� �i• �o�rifn��1 i� �vri�i��o �Thi� ��por� i� a�s��� �i�� ���� �s�ad�rs���di�� �h�� �t� i� �t��^ r��p���4���s�°y �af t��� ��r��r �� ��i� �°epr������tov�� �� ens�r� ���� a����t°o°a1�ti��� �r�� r��;;�rrr�rr��r�d��ae�n� �a�'�re�i h�r�s� ��r� ��19�d �� th� ����tic�� �f� th� pr�j�� ���hi���;t �t�d �r�gi���r�A �t� i� �Gsc� �h� r��po��i�i�i�y �f th� ��n�r c�r �i� r��r�����t��i��� �� i����u�°e �h� i���rc���ti�� ��c� ���:��r�rr�er�c���ic���� a�f�r�� �°s�c��i��� �r� ����ar������� ���t� f��� pr�j��� g����� �r��i ����ifii�;�fi��� �r�� �h� ��r��s���y �t�q� a�� t�6<�n �� ��� �h�� �h� �c�r1�r����Y �r�� ��a�c,�r��������� ��r�y ��.�� ��.��� ���c��°�rr��r��l�iic�r�� i� ��i� fi�sdo l� 67 ���.00�-Z9 ��b���ry ��� �0�.� ������ ������h�i��9, I��o ��s prep�r°�� �hi� ���o�� f�� fh� �x�lu���� �s� �� �h� c0����� �c�e� ��th��°�z�� �g��tt�a Thi� r�p�� h�� b����� �����red �r� ����r���r��� w��h ����r�l�y ���e�t�� �������r�i��� ���i���r��r�g p�°��i�i���a �9� ���er �r�rr��fs��, �6���r �x�r�s��c� or or�p�i��� �r� ����� �� �� ���� ���r�� �i���l �d�i�:� ����od�d ��c��r ���� �e���s �� �h�� ��r���e�t. r� is ���c��r����d�r� t��f �����n ���t��h��6��1, I��� �� pr��ic1�� the �p����A��it� ��r � g�����1 r�vie�r o� �n�l d�soc�r� �r�d �pe�o���ti�r�� in �rd�� th�� ��r�hwork �r�d f���d�tion ����r�rr��nd��i�r�� r��y b� �r�ap�r8y i���rpr°���� ��� e��oec�er�t�d in the d��ign �r�d sp�ci��a�ior��� If ��a��r� �eotech�i��l, �r�ce i� ��t ����rd�d �r��e privil�g� �f rr��kit�� thi� r�cc��r�er�ded r�arie�v� w� �a� �����r�� r�� r����n�ib�lety ��r rr�i�irrterpre��tio� �f ��r r����r�rr�en���ic���o �I�D (�� ������C� App�r�di�es �. � 68 i � � �/ i i �� ����� � �t I n ��I�fo���� �� �� �� � a s f � � �n a� �c ��� e�����r�� �a��t � i�o� � �o� i� �����t� �t� � ��� �t �� �a�� ��� ��s�a� ���� �"� �� o���� �o � � 69 lYSdi1�[1 GfA5F5 HY�PAWY&SF,TI1' Oi' 7YF£ R*i[FA]O�V G:.AiAfxIGF3 $URU�Y �C4'�'�T(I5�3C1 4t�..4}iiRR*�d$ 6Af 'R' � , G'&aWWA � ��'"`�...,."� ^�.�� � TFs" , '_!`� - .��- -' — ,� �' " i > ., P m ac'�-, a+�ur r .e.n -t t -� ,� ., �.�,,.�r�.�.°&��r' �� �" � �.'*� � ��r +` �� ; � � „,�.,��� .�. �� rw �a�,_ � � � ` � r � � -� ( � � ' � 1 ` `� r ; . rj F f '"',� �," , r ,,, y � �� ' �r i ai3 � � � j �� � � r � �� � � i s , �'"^�.� � ��k � � a � � � ^z ,� �j ,sr 1 � "; � � �'°b,� � � f 1 „q � ' �r . (� � `°�' ` ! i .�'.� t �' � �'° �.�� �' "r �r' a / 5 ' � d�� . r „��3' a�' r r �" F � ". ..,. .. : �� r�„,��_ .� �. �.1 r ., *§ � �a ` � � � ' � ,�- € ' � Y � ; ```' � YQ` .. � j ° k � �'���� { �`� ��d `""� � � � ;� � l, . ( r 8�..°f � � . � ��� �� �-- 4 r ; t �� � � `� / X" j a ��„s,:; .u��' i #`�:� ?>T'��v � R �� � !r� °s � d � �. ,A �., �` 3 � � ... �� � ? ,�,•'� � � ,J . °'��.��'. ,r ���. �.` �" � : r` �,a s a.. �,�'�k. � �� :'�.(c fx �., ��. -�-+ � T�. �.'� $ �..� �� � as"y �.� �,,:�� T��,� i�� G.:,.. � �'� .'1. � f. .� _ 1'�t"!4 � `r�r� � s��,,�, �i�.�. i y�. , a v �T j � ,., �'�t4" g m� ���` �-�- 7��V�a ��5 4� .���,� � �`� ��. �` p S 7 ���. , � � � � ,�.� `.�� ' � �° n � �i; � � i � `�' ��� ,� ` �� i r��� f � j j � r � �I � �; � � � � � � Y .i �.a�. '�� p i ��..k y � k "�a� "! "'�{E �7 a., { `�nr: ..; � �°' � _ � � s: `-�.�`'�z ��t'�'�.�'.� `� � � �`E . � � � � � " f ��i � � �� �� " �* � ., -� u �, �� +'�` � � � � . � � � � }� � � ' t , �" ' � T €� � a s � "`�': ,._l� � "� `�a4 ° � ; a�� ' s c , L (?� � � �' -�., r � �� �, � � �� � �� � � � � � �1 i � f � � � �� � j � � � T �'' i � ��f �' ..� � ��; ,�'t � �, Y ` fl ' t " � f��F� � ��; �'°.# `t" �"'-� �,�:� � } �! � "�a i.. ! � �"� �K � � + " � �� �t � � �� � � ��. . lz t r � (-'"�'� , �� r �" j �� ��. �� i ��.� � i ��.�� y � f� ����3 � 1 + ��:��� �. j�� e � � �����i�� ��. s � �� . '.� ¢ y � � � � � .. . 7 � �t �,p �, � �' f �%��� ' a i� �� Y � '��t � ��� : '����� � `� � '�Z� � � z� � ���� r' � � �°� i '��� � -t e J l l � ,�� ::i r � r� "� s. �- d a� 1 � I ��., .� '��� f �' ��, ����-�� ��-u�� ����, ��l � � �l" ` _ �'`, �,� ; �� �, �! �:� ��� ; ���� � 7 � �'' " � t ' �' `F �� ` �.�:: :,, �: �' �,�_, �- �. �� 4 .f��-� `� � qa��. '��: ' � �� � " �����.� � �-�_� ��_ � � � 1 ��� �� b � � � � � �`��' � ~��v��',��' s r� � ���� �� � � ' � � � ��.° �" ' � � � ��' � �� , ,� � � s� �� � � ��:�� r:.�� ��. � �°r , � � �.�� � � �" " " ��` � � � � �� I'�� f x -` � � �� � �� �' `��� �� � --�� �� �,�� �� �. �.4 � � � : �. �. � .' ff 7 7 -r- � °� !�--^, � � �� , . =m� — � �"��-.�-` -� „} < �� ^` � � ti" "' � '�'". � l � � t .s.�. ��'.,.� � � , ,� �'°�� £��`s^ �',� � �'� � �'���- � � � �p '° � ' r � �_ � A � p,.�� f ,,� M4 � �'; - �� 't5 �i }� I 5 �r� �� r '.� �T� � �" Y r�f �P jns. � � ; � ¢ � � � � ��� � �''����� � � � !� y �}` � f$ 2 �4.. �#�n� h. e ,� . E^^ �, { k'7- '�Y � i ? s � � a {= � - . � �`�` ' r F� , �' + r _ ; � � r..: fi �� � � r .a 6 - x - : �� � �' E '� a �r 7 . � � � �� ���,� 1 d � � � ri �`' � � ` � � � � `� �� � �Y� �� � � � � � a �' � �� �� �� � �'-� �� � 1 .,_; � -�..�., �' �� ( � � , �; � - , � F � � ; � � ' ;_-�! s � � =� '�`:; � �� � P7 F" � �� c �/ � t I, s'� � �, � �� � �;� 1 � 4. }' �� ��t�_, I .�`����t ��� z, � � �� � �����"�'° I �- .r� � � r '� � � �� � � ,� ,-��-� � �.-� }�4fi� �fi� ,.e� � �-.�. �^°,z � � � ws�. �;, � �,� � � ��"� � ' �� W � -��� ��� S ' e r � �� ���. �� S � �� � � �„� m�j n "�.�r� ��. � I ' , ' l- j <�.�� .� � .�'� "37' ,� � � a� ��. { � r 1 ''�r-�' �-d . r � � � ' ;'� +,! '�"r� . � �,.ti y -� 4 � '�.r� �,� w � � y . � �� � �� f � �, ��� �'. ��� ��, �.�,� � `�"'� d "�� � � �� �(�-���� k�� � 7,�,, ��-� �- � _ � , r "n�.* , � r n a t� .. jr " i �'" 1 ' ,. v'%`- ''`� � : �� � � � 3 "� j `_ t� , �. ?� �, q �., t � � . ., r 5 �" i . � . � ';{ F _1� � , �c.�' � `��"�� ��� ��'a �"� '� �� }� i ,�#` �� . �,""- n �� ��-¢�� � �.�-'.. � � �,. � � f � � �` � � � � � � ,,,+� s� ,3' rl i �+� § � � !� �"�� � � d � '��� ,�. r � � �f e' ...�.r �"" 3 rf �'�.✓ t + � � `� � ��* ��� X � �, � . � , �� � ,�r � .s� � \ /' 1 �� h \,� J ( '. } ;.. � �� � q J' rl .�. 2a x_�' �F � 1 f] `'' � � � , �:. ,J`' i � _ (, S ' . �... , � j •� �..� � � � ;� r J � t l � � . �'N � ( ��. � � ? I-F f l ' � 4 �-�� � � f � ��' � � # �' �;`� �, i, . w � , �� �� �" ��� �� •'µ ^ ' f k � ��'" � c u, 1 r � il � t "`��A f �- �"`+ +�3 � � y , �� r . , w. ; � � ,; � r � � � � , , �� _� : '� � � �, �.`� 1 * � ��s� ��� v � � ��,"`� o � � � t w•` I �' , a � z � � �`. > �' f � f��� ) �i � �� � � � �� t : - . -{ �. {� j� , : l' -�, � �n.� F .� " 9 E v� < ��,� � �, E� � - �.w — , :�._ � �� � v �. T �"� . "° ^ �, -. .., .. ., � �,. � � _ — . . � �. „ >.. -, . n . , .._ �: �.... .....� � ,., . 4x i . . 4.,, , ---_ at� .., _ �_� �A.. .._ .. ub...,'w-""-., �° n n .. I '"' + >. ,... ,. _ " ,m .. ..,m=. ,�.w., ...._. ... . ���.�_' .. m t ��.,..d w�., � _ ' � �..-,.ti � �rr.rc..eAe.,u..._aw�.. , :a�H a4e.e. -,�, x+cao »�.. Y , m.,..,,� u-� n<_. � �,z r�s.. a . .:...... e.-.. . . . . . .. � mns . �.� we_..� r � . .v . � k-t. ' I = ..... � � �� z.... w.. �...an . m_..,..-:. '-� ; ¢'.U m E vr�r�n., ,..� �., , :rr c..-e.m __.� i ..rr .o. .i ���o����,� �'r e �°° ������ �.-_� .u� ._.. r � .w.���. �-.._ _� �9�����t� ��� ��:o��;�� ����°�`� �;�'�����'��� l��.: 70 __ _ i i i p (j ... I 7 '".flt R. AfA� R�A I 'I . j . . + ' . ' _. _ _ i�'r fr»3S'-t`A '� J � � '� �� � t�a �� a' ' ��e�e�y��a dJ"ry � � , I �,��`�� � � � ��� �� ��� ,� ; a � � �� � � � ; �� � �'` +V ,� A s i tv`+-�C., ' i9�y �� ` D � 1 � / 1 �� �� ��� I ! ° 4.� � u r rura. .< � h ffi ' '�' � XJ�'�. pa'�' a..,., -�`�'� a4 ,� � � ° �v. a i Jn =.� "�• �a � °•�.�r � � `__. f'� ..,aa,4i �%' ��`° � �- �+ �� l /� �.�,t � ,� Y .�, : ✓, �� e / t+! f9.x"r,=C.,�� �°,.�_ ... ..�. U.$ \ '� � � � � pa ' � \ t `�� ffi�,'d �I � . . r � .. � , �1' +�' \p 1� � Yy.s°�''.�i.,'°°^e:.. � > l t .d '�'�. .� 01 $' ' — tEtlS'u1PdC ff � � �°' ��a� \ �1 sii� �! `..-.. � . .� �`� � � . � c !r � ��� �� _� '� � ��� �s� � �. a ...�. , ,,. \� /� eam e� ' J �' -" �. -�` °"^. � �� �� rau _ i � ... / � uau�v r�„ � � " � �'�.�":' _ � �, �", _ �� �� � � ' ..� •�,�,;` � �����. /r l , ..� �,�, r a �c `°-,� > ; ��� ���, � �� �� '� ' O , ��s�a I� � � r�axa aa � ° E. 1 �, � �� � �4��_ � � � r . ��� �� �� ��\\ , � -�° ��,.�1 �°-,�� �' a ✓ � .. '- �_ b o "' .. � °1� � �°�J �\� m ' �- �- ;a / �` � � �� 6� � ��� ,�. _ ,- � 9 � �.� ���a � �;; �� � � � � � � � � /�� �I �^�.� r�.eamc�.�:rc \�`� ... Q ,a' ca�,in.scra ata�� J �7 y 4 ���� "� \ P 1 Lii� '.��m a ( � °we„�. TS�anc.T NrtA. sG+Z>�r I �j /������,���\ � � �' s �� �, ��. � ° 1, � � \ , e� � ' z � � � �'��� �� � �. V `'�� ``� �°' _ � ..� ,.,, ,� � _ .�,� `� .,� � `� _ —� � ,� +� ,>� - ��: �, _ __ u � � ;a_�: .,� . �� � � °�_.. _� �-� ���-�,. �.� '',� --.1 � <��� 1 �� � a m.ye p ' `� � ���a���� ����� ��������� � �4�� �(� � �k; �m��fl�29 _��4 �� -- ��, . _ . ���� ���� ���c��n� ��������.s��z�,��� ���. 71 aq� o> �,.��.� � �,� ��� o,. �,�, .°" ^'�;,,� � �,,,� "� ` : �° � � w ,.;, � � 4 J'� � � - F � # . � i � � .. 5 @� -�" t�' I 5�! .`^.. � IJ � �`^ 1 � � �s����. , �`. t � i 9 I t� t P I ) I „�-�.,„ a e x`L" r �� ��' a � � j (.� E .� � i . �� ;�I��.vl ➢E x_ � I -.�� ,,� � tl + � �.,, i� !r �� r r „ z °" . � � � t C � � i � � � r� 3 � � : t � � t �� J ( � �`� , ` J � � � � �k� .,�.,� 1 I '� � �" `x r � p e Y � ���� /,^ f Y � � � '_ � 7 � �� � '�.. � ` j "��'�� ., # I t � �' �t� �� � � 4 � �� t �� =�l,.�, n� � ��. �� � 1,�� � ' � � � �. r *� �" [ �a 4"' r � �a s �� �ca �' ! � � � i �.�'..�'��'�r =fm-`i ����"�,.�.� � i t � !�� � f�r�l I � � --�� �'� 1 ��t� � Y i �sr� �� .# 6 t, .�.{$. � . � F , � �lu #���� � t -� � "'�� c, i� �., �� r,'� '��� �� Jr�` �;s � � ,�t,;��� ,4 � � �� �aa� ,� 4 � . Aba a � � I� .{ '`„ � � � � ,�i � } t'9 ! � � + � � h � ('- 4 ! � � 3 � T , � � � � TI �- � _� �� � � ,� � w ���. � � o '� �, �� 3 ' � rts� 'k,� `� � � -� � f � f �„., �� `tl'"d'_i�..�'3° P., i u°� s �'� '�-' � a s� �� � ' �'' � /':.,�� �, l � � i 1 l 1 ���� � � i � .� � �_� r 4 �" J �. � a --� I i ,��� � � , � ,� -� � � �r. t ��. � b e '�"� a'i� ° 7 �� r a '�' ? � �' r � �r ��� i �`` ��� � � ��; . � � , � �=� � �t� 5 ,���,,� --,��x � ��,� ���rx ���,� ,_, >,� � ��,.��� � ? c��a. , � �- ��- '.. � � .:r���� � � ' �j� t y � a � r � z � S '�� i's r I .�� � � � �. � j � �-��{ � ��� d � �,, a "'� � it t ,�€�� �� $ .��� `\ �� -�� ,.� � „�a � f� r ^r �,d� � �� , � �-� �t� � i � � � � I ��.. �,�k l � i z � � " �" ° ""P�.. -t� 1,�� � .�� . �' � . Mi � 1 3 �'�1 � 2 .. �ft ��j� z ; � f� �� 1 � ' - � � t � a �, i �-_ � "� / 1 � � t � ���� �.- ; � ' r �- � 1 ��ESY"� }AC �.' �I_ � �f �� �9r �f ' .,.x . : �. � r p ' ..,,�- s- � a 1 � � �� � - ��� � a �� � a I S.y ,c� l� `� �p} � �'I � : 9 $ b �� 7 \1 f.� 1 @. .'m ti � 60t .. }�"� } 3 r �n��� ` r.� � `� � " ,.. r �,� 7`� � w f``x � t��r dt �.t �fl � n r � r � � � � �=�-,�� � �� � p� � � �� �'°��A�''�J � � � ! � `�r " .--s« r � ' � �`i � r : ) ro �' � d j � � '? � ` 1 �,., �� 7 , y�,t��:n � �c I ! � 7 �?�.�• ` rd (��'� � �f ' �. u I _: ` x 1 � 9 ti s �" ��� � �L.-�� �-��-� � � �.1� s f i � � ^ � �h �-- � � i ! i ry r i r �l ' U �` "� ,,s � 4 a � l I L� i`� r� �. !� � T i � r '� � �� t , � �� � � � fJ � " �,J . ? � � i � �r �� 'r� a � � � �; ��x� � " y 'i , r k " r ��. � � � rr �-I.� � � zY .�.�� �� � ��� ��}�(� : �� ��� r, � 'N � J � � � � � � d '� � F � ' s � � � i `-�' �g � , F � . � � k � � �I� ��� � � "��� � 4 � - `)t � r� �" 1'° F � p � I , F 1 r r i � � � � � �� � � �� ��� �� F rt_,, � ( ��� �Z . C j� ( � � . 'm �` �� . � } . 3 � i ' ° s �z � i ..,r , ; `�� � `�� "� � ' ( ' � �� � } � J l � s B - � � �{I �� 4 � � � �-a !' i } "� L'. -� � 9 i r : � '� j � t t � a ! �% s � s t � � r � �� ��� , , .: �� ,. � , � � , �� � � � '� � .� '`— �'" f ``, in �"' 1, _ '""'r�i : r , y / _ V - t 1.� , 11 �� ; 'L J ' 1� . �� � I t � f 7 � �.� ,�k-� t a� � �� L �: ��� ����` , �:,� i � ��.., R ' - a � t `=' f ' � i � ".-� �;� � ; ��. -� � n " . ? �"- ; ; �.. - I'�` t ,, � � � � � , � �� � `' ( ' � � > t- . , � - °> � , � �� f g I . `° , �� �` _.,,. _ � i � S _ � , f ' -� ��� j': t. _ � f• . > � k .� � t f < _ •� , ' \ � � r 1� � p ,� , �h�; . .� < � ' . ` � , � � � -�., i . � , -� . . , � �.. �. � � �i�`�� a e r�. M.�,.,..,,-..�. _,�� i�� � cs�:or ��.�.oe„¢.a.,�.�o,�h � � .. ° "�Y�Y�� �JF �.�A.1�64ib�did � . �u t t_. �.P �a«`�� r�' �«,°�ai: $����9�� ����&�� ��6��� M 9 ha 4 .� E 9 C �ue:em . , , . „'. ..._ ... b ea � anwa. e e..xa ar > a..a.h•� c[.��;+ I i PY3�a B W n ff.x .�.b Pe3..w Fa.u��� f¢.a 4e�^.fl9]@ira�mLnne�m.vavrua ..�FV�e1 �.� .s.r_ .an�! t ,��� °�• "�... r,UPEl71NQ (3UAGRRidQA.G � a __ _ _� . ru,a n . ��. ..;., �a . �..x ��,.� ��. o �,n. , �.�.; u..�.m. —_"__. u�e.ae s,�;�«., o� �� cmu� f���l�fl�6. �1I�.� Eiirectiva: Julvi.tN7tl .,� „ , .,�-..,- . - �. ,¢ Z Sr�t€! C�eak ,�` -...� ... � . �___�.�., .,.._ � ,L,. �o._ .�a..�, � F�R�.�E�;T �`; �°�Qn���� _ ,��� .. .��_ ._ _ �..r..�_ ����.���� �� ����;���� �������������al�, ��1�'a ���.� �� ��� .� �� � ' 72 � --�� .- -- �,�. �.,...,.,..__ ,_� ��_, ..�. _ w����d r�,s� � ��' ; F�,�dt 6?�i�rtuP� „;�;, � s o� y � ��. ��Q�.�^ 9 011'�E1�i8 Y i F`<' � �� � 1 g i , H€���Yd6 � �� ��5 ' � _ . — 1 — -. , � � `� � . �1 � ��_ . � � t � , � ��� p $ I �,:'�� .Pound.�lionit�y�Pr�cG�m f . + ' n '��� �. .. ¢�' . ! 1� � SWi i _...__.� ^�;- . +F �� �. ��.'`'� �y S�e � � �'� Va�la F7ocsr --- � ---- � " � x � Kriov�n FeuSt �' "� �� � �� �� � b ` � ,�`� � �� ti kr7srr� ��a�aH _,.-.- ' „�'� „�:.^.n l � , o., Cmric�lewi ��li � �. � �°��� � � ��� � -.�, .�w+ � � �� .. ��� �. �G-= Uec�+n u�tvica FU'.:a �c�urrte�.� � � �� : � � . � .�'''" � � � a�a �r �, _ � �- �- -Flavad�ry�r��manlLirsa � ��-�...�--°"��``� ,� � '� G �,?� � `��� $ - .�,? � i o . P.s f b�a � ."" � �.s�t. ��! �,.� � , �� 7m �n � � .� � ,� '�. � ^aara C�rutCia➢�+t»o.2� �y �' �� � ��,� ;. "�f �`� � # � ..�'� � r'�� � � . ��� a 3t� R�, M�.a3 2G"DS 'ti p '�� "`�: .. ., � � � � �", a � � �� �, �� j - � , � , i .._-. _� , ,.� 4 3; :.r� / � i — ._ � � � �� �,,;,� � � -d. �l�. � /.i 'l "�- ,,,�� �.., i'� ��"�� � 1..� t .r = � .,am,r�.,..� � .. � �� ' � ' � , -"� � � a � % a _, j . � . �� .„� ��' �,� ,�%' . .. *� �._ _...� � � �� � � �- � � � � �.. � � � -.`. ` � \ /�� �__° `--r� � ° � � �.,,_ 0i � _ � r,./ ` J�f � s �� ' ���� �� �.: ,�� R � *� '�� U� �°�g � � � �, ���,� �,, �'� � �„�t^ q � �,�� '\ �'� 1 .\ � �� , i �� � ° \ . � � ��� � a�,` � ) �� �� � '} �\ / ��"' o � �^ �� � � � �� . 4 � i �� � r l f ���°� � � � �- �'� -� � � � ��� �' � t / �� � - �-P�° � V i�.� �rr � � � .. • . / � f�l , :F�. / � `� . .,. : � ''�-. �� ,/ � j � i �'l / .�.� ! � � k � ; ._ �; j j ; ; _.—�� _ __. ._. � ` x �. ��-,- — __ _..__.I _ ���a�c°� #v � m�a���� ,�u _, _ �..�.,_ �v�. . �� �� ��� � � �`^p'� � gg � ggg � �� �� � � � ���4��"� ����.:���� tll�� '� B✓ ,'A��o 73 , ,� � m , �; � T � '`�, : � � � � ��fi `� �� � �� ��� � � � � �� � F9ybnd �'P�r���i� �' �����°�s��� ���C�_� ����� � � �� � fl �� � �,. � a �� ���?�r��s�'x��yy�, �� �f� �, zu ��J� Ip�ras�ei��€=�r�'� �s A�A'���1`� '� �r : ' � g: .: .- � �:, , .,. ��, �'�t ��`s ��'; r. � r �, - ���� �� �� '; � . �- � v.5 y ��ryr� r � r ,� � � � � � �, � :�; ��e;� : �: � s ,� �a � �� � � '"�� � � .-�,�'' � � � � ,� ` `. � �" . � � . . e � ? �C� �4 Ie�rs n � � � �� � � �it7a^'�*�Vt+ � �� � ��a�3�5� � `� 7 � � '' �� �' � ,, � �'d�� �'� ` e� � � '�,��1,�39 ys�u� �� { � ..�..� € a, � w � ���P�� � � �� t ¢ ,�-o , fl � �� � �' - r '> ' ��. . l � � : � � � �," � � �� � � �� � � ��' 9 � � ' � � � — � �9�� i3 � �� � �� �: � ' 3 � '� � ,� , ��,�. �, � � � � � '.� °�� � ` � � � � � �� � �� r; �'� '��� ���� �t��t ��°�� � ��{� � � � � ari ����� {�{r!uae�l �or trsiaru9� �� �:; �" � � � � � �� '.� �51�� �iI�F��kl��l�r�) � rx � �z � r a . �, ` ..�,°�' � ^`}�' F ?t � �'. 8 �. Y i � ... i � `f . s � - ' � � 9 �, �,�, ,� � �, � � , >� j.; i 4 �`r � �' � `� �am� � � %-, �" � �` ���IPY � { ��$ `; i 4 � y � y x ,� �: I � F^ `£`�� � d � "' .a.y�, :} . P � ,.4 ,i � $� � # �'�. :� � ���� � � �' ' � . � � � �� .�. . s a � �, �a:a.� � , � ' � ��. ;� -"" - '� � � " a ; � �: ,, �, o�� ������� � ' � rv & '� �� � � i � � � v � $���;� � a � � � � � �� �u� � ,�� � ; � � ���� � �, . ,� � � ��= � ,� � �� � � � � � , � � �� > -�;� � � � � � � ��� � � � � � � � ��� ~ � - �� ���n ��� "`.��� �:� � � � � � � � ��� � � � �' .� � � '� ',� , � r`-�� ; �' �» � �: :r � �� � w. � , '�' Y . � � � . � �' ra sd }i fx �' `` �� 4 x,� . c .. �,.� �w�` .'� �' 3, �;" _ ,. �'����+s.����,:�.':.� 4 � �_ .. ; �a . . > ._ ,g � � . � ` s �fY.l,..,iR �.:��. i��p Shc�win� �J�ark�y (�u�terr��ry Ag�d F�uif� (�1��5, C�nlir��1 ���a ��� � ; �� � Q�4�9 _� _. .�ws�.�__ �,- �-�,� ��, �,�`�� Y �����" � � 4���(sC�� ����� � ��"��i�3C����.� �f��`e 74 ��, � � i �'� �b � �� � �'� :� .�� �, -� �,���` � ��.�. ��`°±�` �� �r��' �'� �" . rr '.:; �, �� �,' t � � � �a � . ( s y � .�' � �,`�`� �.�,+` �. �� � � "'.�:'. �' h �+ % t�" a `` .�,. t"' s ��' �'� �' �+� . � � �' ;. � �' .,� � �� � , � �i � �,, � - ',�� ,�`���"� � � ` �J�'� � � r �' ��.k �''"„�" "��e ar "� r �' "� �?.. �`" `�� ��. � a�a � � �� � � �' � ��� ,���� � �.��� �;� �. �� � . 3 "` _� ^� �'� �� s �. '��� � � .� n: � �� " �` ��� �� ' �, � �� ,d „ s � `�� .�t� .� � ��,'- � �� � i " �.�� Y� � �,. � ����� � `� ' �.� � [ 4: �" �; u a�',., . X '� �z,.4`�` �.�„.,g �,� - .� �i .z3v r '� �" . $. � �� �,� �,� � � � �,, � � �� �„ d � .'? s'a �x ; �, "�gY-� � ������� �. "�. ��,.�'����r � ' � � ��. � .�r��, �`s � ^�, � �Y.�xa .�� '` � � � ,��.,� .�., #.# r�r .� _ � 3� � � �, ,. „�� � ��`�'� �� � ���'��, � �;�^a�' ��- ` �`a`�" ' n �..� e+ 2��' �, ' �c� � � � �`�' � a - , ^�`r�` � f '" ., z �"��'� �� ,. �, '�a��.-�.��'�'�� � �= .. � . �:. ��, k , � u x �.,� - ,�g . k :� � . r t � � r� �� a ,. . � �� � ��ff� ;�� � r�� -� � � �� � - �� �� � t `�`" "c�- � .� _.� ' �`�v.��, _ � � �£,,� t � z4 :- =, �...tt�� � �t � h�'.�t�, 1 � �� „� °�, �� „� •� � � � ��� ��"� � �a �' � � � ��'*�- � ���-�� ' ����" �� .t�� � s ' � 'y��.,�,�; �;. Srx�r �, t � r �- � r '}` � � + � ; � �. 1s� ,� - �� �� az, '� z a # � ",` i ti�,' `z� � �, € ' .. ` f �� � .� �. � � � ; � �`{� °� 1�,� � ���� �� � � �� �,� ,: r����a �t � �+ �' � � �. � ��" s "q ,� � �`� �' �`'� Y� � � � : �'�''� ��,� � �`� a� _ �����- � � �� � �, � � �� � � ���� �a� * � �" �f ,: � �� ��,����� � �; �' � � '" {"�r� �aa � �� t . �t '� ��r���:�„ : � � � � � �� �. � � � �� ���� ���� ,� '"e � �;�^` . � '. � _ ��i .� �.�a s : �� �' � •° �� 3 �y�. �r - c �� H t.� Sd'44e i' " `$".e .+ ^s.e. .3 . # l g . �i . � �. `� � �� � � ' b �`�� g �7n� � � � �,�'� �: � CA� . a ��� � �s ��, z � s � �� � � . m ,�'` �"� �` l * '; � � ' � � s „ �" k�� � ¢ . � � r•` ,�,,�„ � � ,v ��a,� � rr✓ 's, ",� rs� . ry �i �'�7 r ; ..� � r �,�``� �4 •°. � �' �-. �t g , .�.�t :'��. �.�'." i � ��7 �e'�" Y � � ' ��"' �=� � �, a"� a '� � ,� � � " � " � -^�° �" � �" ; r � � � +, � 4 . � ` �'� ; f r� �` 7 �� � �� � �`� � � € '� r ' � � ' ;, �� � � ��� �.� � � � ' ' � �r a� , �.,' ��� ,�m " a'�- .� � �.ra- � � r" ;�"� .. 6' fi` „�� �� � ��.. } `��" � � � e,,,. ,�,��� ��r,"�� x *� �s „�. � � ,� � � " y } � „ k �� ��� `t ���'�' � � �� �� t��* � � �� � � �� k ��� �^ � �� � `� � �a� `� '��. ��,�# � �, j � � `�` Y���` '�. '. �.� �., � '` � �" . �' �`�` : . � K�^ -� �� -�. ��',� ,�� . �.� y 3k" � �;` � � �',�; � k v.^ �� � �� �` � � �;� � � ', .� � � ..: m :r3� r�= ,'- n ; i '� . . t � ���,�:-'�" '��.�n.s�`� ��., � ¢ 4 ,i � " � s " �"� � °�. �. � �� „� �� . ��� '"�: � �� ��. � ,rt�.., 1 ,�''. ��`'"�� �� �� �'r � .�.;z`n {` �s'�� � ` a .�.. � ��� �:. `�'� �. ��� ,a.. '� a '�, � � �� �' � s . �' �+� N �� �; t�; ,.. "r� � '� � � s �'� � '� �" �' �� � � �� ���'��� � �� � � � �� {� � -S � ?�;� , '�' sr ,�' 6 � . .��,� s �„ � � N,,,�� '� ,�`� �„ 4 y � . +: R �aa ,`.-`� ��g` � � .� �r �M�� g� ���:� �,y - 4'� �'� '. � � � �: � � ,� � � �����, ,�f � �� ,� r�' � ��� ����. �`�� � � � `� �` `� r �� � � �^,� � � � �� ��"''��'' � �. �a ``_ � .a� ,� � � � � r ;", .� ,�� �" 2 fi � ;� S ° .. �, � � �.., - � P ;� ��` �' w �` - .�' : � "`� � _�' � �z ��� � �,'� � , � �F. ,, ., � � �'� y � .a �° ��_ ` � �" fi„ { 3t'... 76.6 0 _ � --- — .- .— �_—_.._._..._ .. �y — __ . � � �����o �"��t������ ���� � w � ���� �,����°s�� �� � ���o��a �� ��e� ������a� �� �� ��� ���� ���� �� nr�vuoxianr.iieev,w �����"�P���� ���������� ( 6°��� ��6� ����9i� ����� bFCLIPlATION, 1�3N3 �or� ��rnpl�te ��alogic Map �e�cr°iption� se�, h��;//9e�-nsdio�r� usgseg��/me1�d���/rn���rr�f/2.���/m���d�t�.f�qoh�rnl ._ _ � . PPO����C �o ���.����� .a —�r��„� _ �� .�a.,. ��t�....� �������� � _��,���� �� ����C.�� �������j6��9��.���_p I�l�� 75 � �� � s - � � � � � � �6�e ���o�g� �v��°e ��a91�d �� � ���xi��m ���th �� ��i�y�s�v�� (�I) ���t b��o�r t�� �xi��o�g gr��ar�c� s�e���� �� �b��r�� t��� :�oa9 �reafi9� �r�� �� �bt�i� ���n�l�� ��r S�b�r�t�ry �r��ly�i�a �`h� b��ir�g� �r�re drill�d or� �ebru��r ��� ���� �si�g � r��bi9� dri�l rig �r��i/�� F��nd ��Age��°ara� e��o�m���t, �lIDF�� �pp�°o�ci���� loc��i��s �f th� bori�g� w�r� ����rr�i�ed °sn th� Fi�9d �y pa�¢n� �nd ��ghticl9, �nd �r� sh�wr� �n the S�t� �I�� in �hi� App�r��ixa ��I�� �c��a�t� w�r� �b��a��� vuitf�ir� the ���t b�arir��� with S�and�rd P�n�tr�ti�� T��� (�o�'.�o) e�uiprr����o ^I h� b9o�nr ���an�5 w�re ob�ain�� �y driveng th� s�rr�pler weth �:�.4Q ���r�d h�ro�rn�r d��oqpir�g thirty (�0) ir��he� ir� acc�rd�n�� vvith ASTM D� 5�E e � �ulk s�rr�p��� o� �h� sc�i�� �nco�nt�r�� �er� ��th�����1 ��car�t fihe �ug�r� �tat�ir�g�a � °�he fr�al Icags �a� k�r��or��� r��r�����t ��a�° A��erp��t�tic��j �f �he c����nt� �f �h� fe9d �ogs �n� �6��� r��u6� �fi 6�k��r���ry fi��t¢r�� ��rF�rr��d o� �h� ��r��l�� c�btain�d d�ari�oc� t�a� ��b���rf��� ir�v��tiga�i�a�a ���� �r��t 8o�s �r� i��Bu��d �� �hi� �pp�r�c�ixo 76 ��� �� � ���� �� t � �� �) - , Bv'U�`T'�F�� C�if�f�lA, �UP2?�SIGiV4r�� ��II� t�F3C�3' �8v9�� �3C3UP ' �(�� ��G�I�F't,f�E� `�Y�'�S SYk,A�C3L ' �43A�V�LS �L�:1N �fMV�.S �.,� 9 a1Adl7 9� C�z� 3 (.sIFV �N�I.L- . . . . � � �. 1�L tn ��lofa �= �F�.`�.-eG-. <�J"/a �=���� C�,� Atd@<1DlC33� 9ae f � ...� � C�F' ��_�Y-QsrR�L?��3 �9�l�L � � P�F�CTtf� �A�I��J � � � C'?i�l �� �. .��V� �C�8C5 CL.�,59�V A3 �NL CJ�R Cl �P�I .���.`3�Y' �A.V�� �deV�L� V�/tYF! �fPl�� �i u� � j a92°/4 FlN�S � $!n �EN�S GlAS51�Y de5 Cl 6ft CFt � C;.LAY�Y ��'�L � ��� SA.R�1�3�'u C„^� 6W9J6 i� G,� a �' � �j CL�f�.Sd ��PelCl$ �W !N�l.1=����J S�1C] �n � � �5% FII�E�� — � � C„� G f�PJb!(�3 9� Ce� 3 5P F'QC3Rl'Y � ��AT�$� q >5(1°fo f}� �OA�2�f� _ � `1'tOPd PP�S�S ��a�s C�e,�sErv as P�L �R �w Q� �1C� �. �€� S,4PJ[�S �lf� p=1NES 5� S�,`�Y SAdJ(J >12°� FkPd�� F�dES CLF.SSifY AS CL OR Cli �G ���(�y ���� �u�,�T$fYNbC�?(�a PWydt�IDPL0�7S>"h°LhVE 'GL (,,. ��1Y � I�IC3�C�A)EC O�� �.�lJl[J LIMIT<ti0 �t�� fit�� Pi.b75a°n^ �itl� hAL S°i.`i prnw �� o C�3('vt4N4C LL�ov� drled}JLL (r��t drtedf�.76 (3L OF2C �IJiC CLAY O� 51L`1 ¢ d - ��`� 50..TS �I^dD Cl�,9YS PI ��o� >°�° Lt+a� CN �=AT CLAY � � � E1dOX��IC ;, �.F�UI6 �IMI"r">5(1 pl €��o�rs <,,�" ��yt PhW �t1�S76C SI�T 6�. f3S2C"ANIC LL (ova�� driedjRL (rnl drisd)<f�.75 �'i �C+/a1d1� G'l.AV �� SIL`( F11G11LY C31�('s6�PdIC �fY1l.�a ��aas��iv ar�c;r�c �uu,� �� i�a catca, aa� or�ac o� p°�- �,�,�' 6��4�d�°�2A�"BO� E���tS�A6JC� _ 1:� �.s �ov�� i o.� � "'�f�S.9� � �sit1lYi�_ �[LY �Z �Y +�a�ie� �,siv��yc�av c�o�trcan'r� co��sr��:.v ��ov���r-aez° s�i��°�a�r��� �v Laa: � o� a �r �at� r, - a o- n.zs Gcar�:,� M}.ao ,s� z�� aa5-o.�n BA�7.YiL!4�9 L�LP`,S[ 74 � 30 �`IE'd.°,". 6, ., d; p.�`U • 7.0 . . �-.�,9 �1"lh"F YS• V� 9.0-2.f1 �I�Y [?�,JSSL 61f£R &0 V'�3Y SYf� 75 - 3d1 ;3_0 � r2,� '! 9�'�`7 OVF'� 30 f7U'�.Ft 4:U ° ���?:�'t f1� E�LCYSJS C2F 18f] LE14'v^3hi2£�R �FSJJEV�', yO ti�S YfJ iBi2i�� N= E"r��,;t-1 v 4� 't'l�i�if E;*�tl LU.) $4 Sp<?Y�"1�'Vh� LFta""T 92 it�.�p#'"� Q� A�S+� 9�-16.�Y�1 F'i;311+'t {RS'�AJ�.15f & S`f�v"42�'eid.9 E i'�'�:'(T7P,51�1 Yka`�- � >-.-,... .._w.,,..—�-..�- --..�.,�,.=,�. . _' '. � ���� ���� ���a:���������� � � � 6_2�,P9�@��� ���&� 9 ��� �Ied�„ 77 ��� �� C������ for: Site Location: Cupe�ino Westi Cup2r#ino # 19386n F- 100429 Driller/Help�r; Rig Type: Giddings B012TiVG iVO. 1 Ruger Diamefier: 4" Dat�: February �1, 2Q1�_ � ��� A Depfh Blow �lows Drilling Voids N1ois�ure f�escription USCS �eacon (�.) i ype per S�, commenYs Soil TC7 � � G ray brawn silf dayey s�nd SM�SC A1 SI'"f 10 Loose � 5.3 5 SPT 27 �led Dense 1q.1 Dark brown siity slightly claye sand with gravel SN1-SC P,2 I �0 SPT 19 Nled Dense 12.9 Brown silfy clayey sa dy gravel GM�GC ,A3 15 SPT 33 Dense 9.7 Wa er Light brown orange c yey silty sand SC-SM �4 20 SPT 22 Med Dense 19.1 25 SPT 40 Med Dense 75.£3 30 SPT 3€� Med Gense R2.9 35 _� _ Total Depth @ 37' 4� ` � --- �— � --- —_�� —.�_ ._.,._._.��_ __ �5 _ � � __ _ .� �� � _._._ _ _ � ��_ � 50 - -- — - �---- �-- --- ---- ___� __ _.._�.___ _____ GRUU(VC]WR, I ER SAMPLE TYPE ----.._._,_ __o _�_ Tirne DepYh SP I=Stanciard C�enetration 7est (i.ancnrrectec� value, PJ/��r ����s� ��a���, 6�) JJ'-19' 78 � �° . � ' 9 % �,� ��m����`°� T����� �� ����� �� ����� ��9� �'�°���i�i � � t t�ol 1 � � m� �`"� I �7 0 � �� m7 �� ��' � 79 ���rrapl�� ��re r�vi�er��� �E�r�� wi�h f��l� 6�g� �� ci�f�rr�ir�� �vhi�h v���l� be ���ly�ed ��rth��a LL��h��� cho��� f�r 6ab���t��y ����y�i� �r�r� �or��¢d�r°ed repr�������i�e �f �osl� th�t ��ul� be �xp���� �nd/c�r �ss�d ��rinq �r��i�9� and tho�� d�err�ed t� b� vvi�hir� �h� i�fl��r��e of �h� �r���sed ���°u�t�ar�a ����t r���lf� �re pr�sent�c� i� �F�is A�p�ndaxa ��xpan�ic�� ir�d�x te�t v��r� p�r��rm�d �� �ulk ��il s�r�►pl�s in ac��rdar��� uvi�h the �.�oCa Th� s�r�ple� �tr�r� s�,�r�h�rged ��d��° �.44 p�ur�d� p�� �y��r� f�c�t �t ��i�ture �o���nt �� n��� �0% �at��°��i��e ���pl�� vv�r� �F��r� ���b�e���d i� ��t�r for 24 B��u�°� �n� �h� ��1c��nt �� €�x��r»o�n �r�� rec�rded with � �s�l ir���c�t��, � Maxem�r� ����i�y vvas ��rF�r��d �c� ��fir�at� t�y� ��i�t�a�°��d�r��oty r����iar�sF��� �� �pic�l sc�i9 �����ri�l�a �h� ���t� �r�r� ��rf�r��d ir� �cc�rd�r��� ��rath ���M de�i�r���i�r� � �.�57m$�o 80 _ �. �0�'���� ��X� ���� ����h t����� ��r��o Mois���°� �o�a (p��) ��o�) Ni�teriaA A�. 1� 0'�7' �M�S� 125��. iia� 32 M�teri�l A� �@ �'��YZ` �M��� �.2�4Q 1000 3� fv9ateria@ A� �� 13°�1�° �f�m�C, ��30� �05 �� �ateeial A� �.C� 1�°m3�' S��S�B 11500 150� �4 81 ���� � � ����� �������������� �� �� �' � �` ��mr �y.��.p�,¢�, � ��� �� �� ��� ��-�-- � ���,.. — � � aa���a � � �-� a.�--�° °— � �. a.- � � ��� �g �� ��a��±s�� ° °� 6 �° W ���� - � ,�.��� �� _p�.,����µ�.� „ -- � ����t�o� €���t'u�sa,��a ��� ��,�~-- � �R1�r��'F����� �����s��. ��'"' � � � � � s�'��� �° .�` � _ _ a �_ � __. . � .� _ _�w� � � � � _��187�����:��IB�T� �.�d� '° 11i�W�P�Y&��G��� ��f3���kC ��d�El�hD� a����/�8�.� ��`� ������i�"J��� �,—°`'°��-= � � � ,� �?�!� 1A�6'af "`�,:�' �ii'�' 1,31�;[3 ..� "'� �„v" �` "`� .,,�`'� ,.� �^," r �.� . r"° _ �� �.s� �' �' �.�.,--.,_,.�.w.,...._�.�._,.. .u.,: _,�.,_�. ._ _ � . ,.__ .s€- �� �,�.._ �' _� �.,._ � -�.. ,m-f ", � �� � � � � � � [ 7 �3 S� r� � "Y � [7 � 1 t, l� *, .,- �' " a. � � .- � _. ��.. ,-�� d m .-. �,�. � t°` � � _ .�.� —�_C�'�'��9oY;��1VA��� SP,%�: �K7�so�H@. � -"' £�2��T?f,��: ���3��6J�D9�,9� �6VCl a� __ =�.� 1raJ��`�k����C� `J �9hleid�6�`�44��S��D ����Ca�';4� �'3 � �7 � 4� Ca §� ...-- ".-- "� . �' ,.�" �� .� Q R�°'Y � � ,��-. . .....�,,. �.. _ . .�:.�,�:....,,a.,� -�.-.—.n..�,...�.�-„_ ���'���,� ��� ��� ��9.�..,. �G°����i� ����a��:�������,, �G�l�o 82 �� ���.� �BEG�l126& V i�B�A i� Cd 9��� ��� ������ .. � g� g��;�i _ __. �m._ ---...__. ��� �� c7�'��� �� - C9d����°6� �`�Fa+� ._ �."� ���bS� �� �fdf3A�9 �' �d��� . � 1. ➢as�[acan afn.infoa�cing §C�;1� z��u�l'ru� _ °"—____ _.�_ � _ s �st�:st�wssing e�itdflns, �std p m�a�e, — m 3C Fal:I �A�: 3.5, 7.1-7:1 d913.4 2. �sp�ctian m@ r�inforceng ste�l e�veldin� a� w �AWS 171.4 _�__..__�__ �accoed�scc� wif� °F'ab� 1l�4.3, AB�m Si'. -° `°-° � 9 3 .5.� � _ , �� 3. dns�tiaaa of tsnl�s eU tz� ins�U�cl i� ccssac��;te prior Ho a�d during placemetrt of oo�ar.c�2e ��r� AL'� 31$: 9911.5, �1]arveble 6o�ds have b�en increased or ovm�r� � � 0.A.3, 21.2.5 �912, fl �tae��ih d�si� is us�. A. Inspecaio� of �rachar� inse� lll�d 1n �ardeg?zd -- A�] 31 �: P coau�te, � 3.II.6. �.1,3, 2fl.2.fl g912.fl 5. 'Veeifyiea�; �s� o� s��ir�s9 c�i� mi�. �„� �{ AG°I 3Y&: �h. �, 5.2-3.d H4i}2.2.2, 1993.2, _ __ 1913.3 b. f�4 the trtn� 4n;sh coicr�a� is s4a�t�7ed to f�tic�4e speci�rens 4or st��geh ¢eses, �rf�rau s9wnp �d A5`17m9 C]"�� air ca�t�crY t�sts, �nd d�a�nnitse tlee t tus� � — A..ST�A C 31 1913.10 of ttae ca�cr�¢�. ACA 318: 5.6, 5,$ '�. 7ns�ctioa aPcon�rete ;zrad sh��2� pAac�m�ne _ 4oe Eroper aa��plis�ia� t�ci�aiq�ses. � -- +��� 318: 5.9, 5.10 1913.�, 1913.`�, 1913.� $. �sg�ction ffo� xnmea�tzraavc�, oF s�cifi�d c�arie�� �¢��¢�a�°�rad2�clariiqa�es, `° � ��131�:5.1fl-5.i3 147�.� 9. �spect�an of �res�e�d co�ee�iw: �� __ _� a. Applica4am of �st�ssaa�� 9o�s. � A�� 39�: ➢&.�D b.CBeouGrag o#'honc�d pa�st�cssting 6er,clons ia� ;{ ��` e4�%31�: 113.18.4 � t9sc �esanic-f�rce-a�sistiaa� �yst�m. � 10. ErecYAOn of p�ec�s¢ corter�ae roerrab��s. � % A� 3l $: C�. ] 6 — �--- —.___ _— ------..__. _ l 1_�1eri�icgtian of in=.si4u concre� s9r�gih, q�rior 20 stressing of tendo�ts in ��nsioaed c�nc�¢e �nd piior W ae�,�sooval of shor�s �nd �ma�s froe� °� � �C7 3�6: �i.2 — �e¢e�� �� skz�cpae�sl sl��s. 72. �ns�R for��e*�ar� 2or sha�;� �ocadoo �aasi � ". _ _—_---__ ciar�ensio�s of' 4he �;oa�ce�ta: �e��af��t �ee�� _. 3C fa�� 31E: 6.1.1 — I _.____foran�. --- _. . _ _ _ �.�_ __ � . � 83 ������ v��.� _ ._ v. �� s� �r��� n���,��a ��� s������s�a �� ��� �r�,�aa����rsaa o�a�������a �a °�s � ��e�r�a� � � ���.�a� °�� � �� e���s���t� v x�s�, � �a � ��� �. V�rify eaes¢�sia7s k�;low shallr��✓ k'�u�a�aea��� a� �c�ja�t�q� tu _ _ �schie�ae � ci�s��� P�n� c���cify. °�` � - - -�—�_. .��._. 2. V�si�y �xce�v��ctls arc e�qes��c� to �rro� d�p� taead i��aw� r�ch�ci ��r �tat�!ri€�1. � � 3. k'��fvrre� classifica�ion aac9 e�sein� �i c.ean d fill _ r��eraals. � X � 4. V�ifq u..€; oi pro�r �aee�ials, cP�n,I2ies �nd lifr thic�rZS�s -�� -- �3uring plac�qn�nt �d �ompacelon o4 �o Pill. ?C � 3. F;ior 4� plas�r� �n[ ot co�pace�d til➢, ob�rv� �eb�rade �d v�r�P'y ttsaY sits has �en �rep�d pr��ly. "'°' � T��¢�� �7�.� R[ 6��.�D ��� 6f$3f� AR3� IN�P��T��9� �8� OP��� �� ���f+ �S��IP3 Fd EL���F�`�� &l�RI� !� APdO � 4� LF�1 Y 6�f� �� � �3'i�3C� 9'�,�'c�t &�i - � f.9 PERS� � �J�1P ��K &,� - Y. �Obsc�x� drilT�ng apea�taous and aaaaee�a�i�, compl�t�: arad � accur�e�e a�eeuxds Fur �ach �le:rn€;�t. --° 2. Vc;rify p➢�ace�en4 Ioca4ions �nd plumbe�ess, caafur� �l�ane�aa �_ __.. .��__ ___..�__.__ diam�aers. �1! diasnecers (af �p�lit^able), lem�Yhs, �a�c7rment � �to ts�r�ck (e4' ap�lacable) �d �d�u�t� �nd� 'sag; sera�t� -- ���ca¢y. 6Reccartl co�acsete �r �rorzt vol�rrn�s. 3. �or cocacs�t� elemenss, �rforer� �ddaslonai ins�c�ians in —__._.._ _ ��c�a�cl�nc� a�eth 5�cteon 17(&3.�. � — — �t m___,__ � ��.��.__ 84 ` ` Aitachment6 TT N, I ES AN SS CIATES, INCo CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS May 19, 2011 C5031 TO: Colin jung Cupertuzo City Planner CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 SUBJECT: Ge�technical I'eer IZeview RE: Verizon Cell Phone Tower and Utilities Shelter West of 22745 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive At your request, we have completed a geotechnical peer review of the subject application using: • Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Beacon Geotechnical, Inc., dated February 28, 2011; • Civil Sheets (2 sheets,l0- and 40-scale) prepared by Rick Hayes, dated March 2�, 2011; • Architectural Plans and Details (4 sheets, 4- and 8-scale) prepared by L.D. Strobel Co. I�lc., dated January 12, 2011; • Topographic Survey (1 sheet, various scales) prepared by Cal Vada Surveying, Inc., dated November 10, 2010; and • Architectural Plans, Profiles and Details (4 sheets, various scales) _ prepared by Trillium Telecom 5ervices, dated December �, 2010. In addition to the above referenced documents, we have reviewed pertinent technical documents from our office files and completed a recent site ulspection. I�ISCiJS�IOi�T We understand that the applicant is proposing to remove the existing cell phone tower located adjacent to the northwestern corner of 22745 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive and replace it with a 70-foot, 'monopine' cell tower. Based on our review of the referenced plans, the proposed tower will be located approximafely 50 feet to the west of the existing tower. Two utilities shelters are also proposed to be constructed adjacent to the Northern California Office ' Central California Office 330 Village Lane 6417 Dogtown Road Los Gatos, CA 95D30-7218 San Andreas, CA 95249-9640 (408) 354-5542 • Fax (408) 354-1852 (209) 736-4252 • Fax (209) 736-1212 �AI�VWDCO��OY�ill'�S<COITi v �� CoIi�1 Jung May 19, 2011 Page 2 C5031 area located immediately south and east of the new tower. We also understand that portions of the existing western boundary CMU wall will be affected by proposed const�cuction and a new CMU wall is proposed around the Verizon utility shelter. Grad'uig quantities were not provided. �I`�'E CO�TDIT'IO�TS The subject area is characterized by relatively flat to gentle, northeast-sloping inclinations and is located on the northwestern corner of a residential lot. The adjacent lot is currently occupied by a single-story residential structure, which was apparently constructed over a cut/fill pad. The new tower and Verizon utilities shelter are proposed to be constructed in an area occupied by a moderately steep (up to 26% inclinations) fill slope associated with a fi11 prism supporting a traffic turnout adjacenf to Stevens Canyon Road. The AT&T utilities shelter is proposed for an area that appears to have undergone relatively minor grading. The site is mapped as being underlain, at depth, by Monterey Formation bedrock. The Project Geotechnical Consultant encountered up to 37 feet of clayey silty sand during drilling activities; groundwater was encountered at 17 feet. Boring log data in the referenced report indicates that blow counts were below 20 within the first 10 feet. The City Geologic and Seismic Hazards Map indicates that the site is Iocated within an "F" zone, which is defined as a�l "area of potential surface fac�lt rupture Izazard witlzin 300 feet east and 600 feet west of the Monta Vista and Bera•ocal faults." The subject property is mapped as being situated between two potentially active traces of the Nlonta Vista fault, located approximately 450 feet to the northeast and 320 feet to the southwest of the site. The active San Andreas fault is mapped approximately 3 miles southwest of the property. COI�TCLUSI�I�� A.IVI7 IZECO�IME�T17EI71-�C'I'IOI� The proposed improvements are constrained by the close proximity to an area of existing fill material supporting traffic facilities, the nearby Monta Vista fault, and the potential for very strong to violent ground shaking. The Project Geotechnical Consultant has recommended that the proposed cell phone tower and utilify structures be founded on pre-fabricated foundation mats fabricated by Cell Block Inc,. or on mat slab foundations supported by drilled piers. The Consuitant h�s �lso indicated tk�at 3 to 4 feet of soil materials should be overexcavated and �ecompacted as engineered fill beneath all propo�ed improvements in order to provide a uniform bearuzg surface. Wl�ile we do not have geotechnical objecfions to the basic layout of site structures, we have geotechnical concerns about whether the proposed tower and its foundation system have been designed to adequately resist wind and seismic forces. The Project Geotechrucal Consultant mentions the potential use of drilled piers for the tower foundation. Clarification should be provided whether pier foundations are included in 86 ��T�'°� ��II1LE5 1�I�TI� ASSOCIATES ��rc, Colin Jung May 19, 2011 Page 3 C5031 the project design or supplemental information should be provided regarding alternative proposed foundations. Additionally, it appears that construction of the new cell tower will require grading of the existing site fill slopes. Plans should be provided illustrating how desired pad grades will be established for these areas. Consequently we recommend that the following Items 1 and 2 be cornpleted prior to granting Geotechnical Clearance: 1. Grac�in� ancl Fo�nclation Pla�s and Calculations - Foundation and grading plans should be provided that show final construction grades and foundations of proposed site structures. Structural calculations should be subxnitted that address wind and seisrnic loading criteria. If retaining walls are to be built, they should be depicted. The plans and calculations should be certified with the stamp of a Civil Engineer. 2. �u��lernental Geoteshnical I)esig,n Criteria - The Project Geotechnical Consultant should evaluate geotechnical aspects of the above requested plans. If excavations will be required to achieve final grades, the Consultant should provide additional reconunendations for final graded slopes or required site retaining structures. If additional fill is required, the Consultant should evaluate the condition of existing site fill materials and provide appropriate grading criteria for new fill placement. If piers are to be included as part of site foundation design, minimurn embedment depths should be specified by the Geotechnical Consultant. Appropriate documentation to address the above two items should be subrnitted to the City for review by the City Geotechnical Consultant prior fo granting project geotechnical clearance. 3. Geoteela�ieal 1'lan Revgeva - The applicant's geotecluiical consultant should review and approve all geotechnical aspects of the project building and grading plans (i.e., site preparation and grading, site drainage improvement� aild design pararrteiers for foundations) to ensure that their recornrnendations have been properly ncorporated. Plan review by the Geotechnical Consultant should include the following: The results of the plan review should be summarized by the geoteclulical consultant in a letter and submitted to the Town 87 �o�r�o�, Sx�r��� ��t� A�s�c����s, ��rc. Coluz Jung May 19, 2011 Page 4 C5031 Engineer along with other documentation for building permit plan-check. We recommend that the project constraints and design issues noted above be add�essed by the Project Geotechnical and Engineering Consultants and incorporated into construction plans. Appropriate documentation to address these items should be submitted for supplemental geotecluiical review prior to approval of permits for project i construction. I.I�II'I'1�TIO�TS This geotechnical peer review has been performed to provide technical advice to assist fhe C'ity with its discretionary permit decisions. Our services have been limited to review of the docurnents previously identified, and a visual review of the property. Our opinions and conclusions are rnade in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices of the geotechnical profession. This warranty is u1 lieu of all other warranties, either expressed or implied. Respectfully submitted, COT"I�OI\T, �I�IItES AI�I� A.S�OCIATES, Il\TC. CI'I'�C GEO'I'EC�IIVICI�I, COI�SiJLTT `I' .---°.°.� �-- �--'� � Ted Sayre Principal Engineering Geologist CEG 1795 �' � � � C3 � .� � - David T. Schrier Principai Geotechnical Engineer GE 2334 TS:DTS:kd 88 Co�TO�, �xY��� ��r� As�o������, a�rc. Attachment7 V�rizon �erele�� • Pr�posed ��se �t�#ion (�ite Noa 193�65 " Y��S� �LIp��II�IO 22475 ancho eep Gliff ri�e • upertino, Ca6ifiornia taternent of arnrnett dis�n, Inco, o��ultang Era ineer� The �r°rn of Hamznett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers, has been retained on behalf of Veiizon Wii•eless, a personal wireless telecommunications carrier, to evaluate the base station (Site No. 19386� "West Cupertino") proposed to be located at 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive in Cupertino, Califoi�nia, for compliance with appropriate guidelines luniting huznan exposut•e to radio frequency ("RF") electromagnetic fields. Execufii�e �urrarnary Verizon and AT&T propose to install directional panel antennas on a tall steel pole, configured to resemble a pine tree, located at 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive in Cupertino. The proposed operations will comply with the FCC guidelines limiting public exposure to RF energy. Prevailing xposur� Standards The U.S. Congress requires that the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") evaluate its actions for possible significant impact on the environment. A summary of the FCC's exposure limits is shown in Figure 1. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health, The most restrictive FCC liinit for exposures of unlullited duration to radio frequeucy energy for several personal wireless services are as follows: Wireless Service Frec�uencv Band Occu�ational Li�nit Public Lunit Microwave (Point-to-Point) 5,000-80,000 MHz 5.00 mW/cin 1.00 mW/cin BR5 (Broadband Radio) 2,600 5,00 1.00 AWS (Advanced Wireless) 2,100 5.00 1.00 PCS (P�rsonal Cominunication) 1,950 5.00 1.00 Cellular �70 2.90 0.5� SMR (Specialized Mobile Radio) 855 2,�5 0.57 700 MHz 700 2,35 0.47 [most restrictive frequency range] 30-300 1.00 0.20 Gener�9 Facility Requirerr�ents Base stations typically consist of two distinct parts: the electronic transceivers (also called "radios" or "channels") that are collnected to the traditional wired telephone lines, and the passive anteiu7as that send the wireless signals created by the radios out to be received by individual subscriber w�its. The transceivers are often located at ground level and are connected to tl�e antennas by coaxial cables. A small antenna for reception of GPS signals is also required, mounted with a clear view of the sky. � _ �� I�1��1���' � E�1�o1�t, �1vC. •' CONSULTII�TG ENGII�EEPS B9ZO ,., a s�tvFaa.vcJSCO Page 1 of4 89 10erazon irele�s • roposed a�e tatiora ( ite o. 193�6� " est Cupe I�O 22475 ancho eep Cli rive • Cupe�in�, Califor�ia Because of the short wavelength of the fi•equencies assigned by the FCC for wueless services, the antennas require line�of-sight paths for their signals to propagate well and so are installed at some height above gi T�ie antennas are designed to concentrate their energy toward the horizon, with very little energy wasted toward the sky or t11e ground. Along with the low power of such facilities, this means that it is generally not possible for exposure conditions to approach the maximum pei7nissibl� ex�osure limits without being physically very near the antei�titas. Cornputer Modeling Me�hod The FCC provides direction for determining compliance in its Office of Engineerin� and Technology Bulletin No. 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC-Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation," dated August 1997, Figure 2 attached describes the calculation methodologies, reflecting the facts that a directional antenna's radiation pattern is not fully formed at locations very close by (the "near-field" effect) and that at greater distances the power level from an energy source decreases with the square of the distance fi•oin it (the "inverse square law"). The conservative nature oI' this method for evahzating exposure conditions has been veri�ed by numerous field tests. �ite and F�cility Des�ripti�n Based upon infonnation provided by Verizon, including zoning drawings by L.D. Stroebel Co., Inc., dated June 10, 2010, that canier proposes to install six Andi�ew directional panel antennas — two Model DBXLH-6565A-VTM, and one each IVlodels DBXLH-6565B-VTM, LNX-0513DS-T4M, LNX-6513DS-TOM, and LNX-6514DS-TOM — on a new 64-foot steel pole, configured to resemble a pine tree, to be sited near the building located at 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive in Cupertino. The antennas would be n�ounted with up to 6° downtilt at an effective height of about 62 feet above ground and would be oriented in pair� (one DBXLH and one LNX) toward 20°T, 110°T, and 210°T. The m�i�num effective radiated power in any direction would be 2,100 watts, representing simultaneous operation at 1,500 watts for cellular and 600 watts for 700 MHz service; there is proposed no operation on PCS Frequencies at the site. Based upon information provided by AT&T, including zonin� drawings by Connell Design Group, LLC, dated April 5, 2011, that carrier proposes to install nine Kathrein Model 800-10765I� directional panel antennas on the same steel pole, inounted with up to 4° downtilt at an effective height of about 52 feet above ground and oriented in groups of three toward 10°T, I 10°T, and 210°T. The maximum effective radiated power in any direction would be 7,250 watts, representing simultaneous operation at 1,890 watts for AWS, 2,860 watts for PCS, 1,510 watts for cellular, and 990 watts for 700 MHz se�vice. 3 ` Hl��ili/iE'3"I' �z EI)I50N, ��tC. � � cousuLTUac sNC�r�ERS B9Z0 , ' s,�N r�z�vcisco Page 2 of 4 90 Verizon ireless • ropc�sed a�e �ateon ( ite o. 193�6 66 �S� 6�I.Ip��II�HO 22475 ancho eep Cli rive • upe�ino� C�liforr�ia Study Resu9�s For a person anywhere at ground, the maximum RF exposure level due to the proposed Verizon operation by itself is ca.lculated to be 0.�068 m�J/cm�, wl�ich is 1.3% of the applicable public exposure limit. The maximum calculated cuinulative level for the simultaneous operation of both carriers is 2.5% of the public exposure liinit. The maxiiniun calculated cumulative level at the second- floor eievation of any nearby building� woutd be 3.9% of t�ie public exposure Iimit. It should be noted that these results include several "worst-case" assumptions and therefore are expected to overstate actual power density levels. N� Recornmend�d Mit6g�tion Meas�res Due to their mounting locations, the Verizon and AT&T antennas would not be accessible to the general public, and so no mitigation measures are necessary to comply with the FCC public exposure guidelines. It is presumed that the carriers will, as FCC licensees, talce adequate steps to ensure that their employees or contractors comply with FCC occupational exposure guidelines whenever w�rk is required near• the antennas themselves. Concltasoon Based on the information and analysis above, it is the undersigned's professional opinion that operation of the base station proposed by Verizon Wireless at 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive in Cupertino, California, will coinply with the prevailing sta.ndards for limiting public exposure to radio frequency energy and, therefore, will not for this reason cause a significant impact on the environment. The highest caleulated level in publicly accessible areas is nluch less than the prevailing standards allow for exposures of unliinited duration. This �nding is consistent with measurements of actual exposure conditions talcen at other operating base stations. * Including the nearby residcnces. ; ; :'. I�L�Ii/II!/IETI' �S EI�I90I�d, I�1C. B9Z0 ? - x CONSULTING ENGIAEERS ' �_ _,. ." s�N F�u��c�.sm Page 3 of 4 91 V�rizon ir�l�ss • ropose a�e St��i�n ( ite No. 193 6" est u�r�ino"� 2475 ��cho �ep �li rive • u er�ano, Ca9ifornia cathor�hip The undersign�d author of this stateinent is a qualifi�d 1'rofessional Engineer, holding California Registration No. E-1 �063, which expires on June 30, 2013. This work has been carried out under his direction, and all statements are ti•ue and correct of his own knowledge except, where noted, when data has been supplied Uy others, whach data he believes to be correct. .�°�. �,a���S;,� I��s,�',� r r �� �.�� �k�'' �gr� . � � ' F ..< ` r''"m" � � � • b � � at � athur, .E. ' � �" ; a�, �;-1 �C� � �+t � '707/996-5200 June 17, 2011 ��, � ���-;;�! } �' �� �� r � ti �� ����� ; ���������.�� a ��� ����� �. a s �`t` ..,. .r%����'�� 4gL ��I.��� 1��. �� r «� ^' CONSULTI�IG HNGINHERS B9ZO <;+!: �`i saN raaNCrsco Page 4 of 4 92 FCC �dio Freq�aency rotection aaide The U.S. Congress reQuired (1996 Telecom Act) the �'ederal Communications Cormnission ("FCC") to adopt a nationwide huinan exposLU•e standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a significant impact on the environment. The FCC adopted the limits from Report No. 86, "Biological Effects alld Exposure Criteria foi° Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," published in 19�6 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and 1Vleasurements ("NCRP"). Separate liinits apply for occupational aild public exposure conditions, with the latter liinits �enerally five times more restrictive. The more recent standai•d, developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and ap�roved as Aznerican National Standard AN�SI/IEEE C95.1-2QQ6, "�afety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequelicy Electromagnetic Fields, 3 1cHz to 300 GHz," includes similar limits. These limits apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. As shown in the table and chart below, separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter liinits (in italics and/or dashed) up to five times more restrictive: Fre uency Electromagiletic Fields (f is fi•ec�uency of emission in MHz) Applicable Elect� Magnetic Equivalent Far-Field Range Field Strengtll Field Strength Power Density (MHz) (V/m) (Alm) (mWlcm`) 0,3 — 1.34 614 614 1.63 1.63 100 100 1,34— 3.0 614 823.8/f' 1.(3 2.19/f 100 180/f 3A — 30 1842/ f 823.8/f 4.89/ f 2,19/f 900/ f' 180/f' 30 — 300 61,4 27.5 0,163 0.0729 I.0 0.2 300— 1,500 3.54'�f 1.59�(f �f/106 �(f/238 f/300 f/IS00 1,500— 100,000 137 61.4 0,364 0.163 5.0 1.0 1000 Occupational Exposure ,� 100 pC� N � Cell � �� � 10 � FM ♦ �' � � 1 � � � � �� � 0.1 Ptcblic E.� oszfre 0.1 1 10 100 10 10 10 Frequency (MHz) Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty miinates, for occupatioi�al or puUlic settings, respectively, do not exeeed the limits, and higher levels also are allowed for exposures to small areas, such that the spatially averaged levels do not exceed the liinits. However, neither of these allowances is incorporated in the conservative calculation formulas in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technolo�y Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) for projectin� field levels. Hanullett � Edison 11as built those for�nulas into a proprietary prograin that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual radio sources. The program allows for the description of buildings and un�ven ten•ain, if required to obtain more accurate projections. , ' IIAIVIIVdE'I"I' Rt EI)I�ON, II�dC, coNSULTivc ENCU.iEERS FCC Guidelines . , � " °�3 SAN bRANCL5C0 F1gUC0 I 93 F,C LC�� alcula#ion e#hodoio y s�es�ment by Calculatoorr of Co pliance vv�th FCC xpostare u�delin�s The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ( to adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a significant impact on the environment. The maximum permissible exposure li�nits adopted by the FCC (see Figure 1) apply for continuous exposures from all solirces and are intended to provide a pi inargin of safery for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the lilnits. Near Fieldo Prediction methods have been developed for the near field zone of panel (directional) and whip (omnidirectional) antennas, typical at wireless telecoinmunications base stations, as well as dish (aperture) antennas, typically used for microwa.ve lii�lcs. The ailtenna patterns are not fully fo17i1ed in the near field at these antennas, and the FCC Oftice of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) gives suitable formulas for calculating power density within such zones. For a panel or whip antenna, power density �= 8 0 ��x D P �x h' in ���W/�rn2� sw O.1x16x��xP and for an aperture antenna, maximum power density smax — � X h2 , in mW/cm where 6gyV = half-power beamwidth of the antenna, in degrees, and Pnet = net power input to the antenna, in watts, D= distailce from anteuua, in meters, h= aperture height of the antenna, in meters, and a� = apertuz�e efficiency (unitless, typically 0,5-0.8). The factor of 0,1 iil the ntunerators cor7verts to the desired units of power density. Far Field. OET-65 gives this formula for calculating power density in the far field of an individual RF source: power density S= 2.56 x 1.64 x 1Q0 x RFF x ERP 4 x a�t x DZ , in mW/cm where ERP = total ERP (all polarizations), in lulowatts, RFF = relative �eld factor at the direction to the actual point of calculation, and D= distance from the center of radiation to the point of calculation, in meters. The factor of 2,56 accounts for the increase in power density due to ground reflection, assurning a reflection coefficient of 1,6 (1.6 x 1,6 = 2.56). The factor of 1.64 is the gain of a lialf-wave dipole relative to an isot�opic radiator. The factor of 100 in the nuinerator convei to the desired units of power density. This formula has been built into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density froin any nuinber of individual radiation sources. The pro�ram also allows for the description of uneven terrain in the vicinity, to obtain more accurate projectioils. ' �� °'�� HAI�1iiE'i"I' � EI�I501�T, I1�C. �' `� - Methodolo _ � j CONSL �NGIN�HRS gY . ._;; s�Nr�za��cLSCO Figure 2 94 Aitachment 8 Rancho Deep Cliff Verizon/AT&� Alternative Sites Map �`.�C�'���!;Jh` $'���..! f i[EM i�..i!t �L' ��� � _E-�'��7?���� Ye, .,`�s'is'�.z'¢C {����L�����{'i+F�^e�a 'Sg � 4a I x" s � �I f�t' Ir1�i ./� h �'". f � � �' f � � ��F � C4: 4 �s�'��S `�°r ir .� +� � � � � f ! s ,�;. � � '��Rr!, r?P� '��f,•�` �'��F ��IF����` '�` �«�' �na�� - � �r�� �vt` � � '!� � �i�7F r ��f i�.�f'�fi��� .�' {C���� �.����'.'rFa 7 � t � � ;� F �[ak ����� � �- `� � f +: t- s '.r=3 � � y, -� �JF' F' t� ��� � Gd C� 9 u�' "�"' s f �. � Xp,�- � �,- � I� E'' � �'� r�. e.�F � � � _ ..� � 4i Eo � . , � � � " � .r, � .�_`,�� wF `_ � �i � '�+ f� E �'"' � � � �� � i �.q'>�a (�� � �e ii'�ye i, ��� ; �G�t�'k�4x�'�� �F' �T� �'�" MCCLELLAN RD� �: j' ����� �," �"�' � i �? � • � L� � � w�ss �] Ii� � � �'' �' ' z" � F#-°g � � r� � � , � dC a37'!F ,� , �e ,�. ' :�� �� s � �, ' '; 4t . � �� P� � � � 1 }:t �`�+ I� ` � r. A'�� �'", t "� 'M�L C `���� 1�� E` !..=� ` ,� ��� �C�'�� �t?���o- � �,� ,� �„� �"� �,� 3l: � � ��d �" [� �. �� .� pa � �-� � � R �'� ' � �: i � �w t" � f �' ' ' � .� � •- ^� � �! � � ���, � �� �� b Y` f F4� `" � 1 � r�T �: Cr"�° }( /d'/� l �'. e � ��' a , . ,�� a a �,k �t��{ t ,,5��, ; `o y �,r:?IY�Yr 1r' �, . ���,�-wigi'"�� '� � ���� �� -��„�s=' ��`��� k`"- r t f�? f � � 1 �.L. r r + nk �I 7 � � r �. fi �' � ,.. f — � , t :� . � � ^ `� `� _ �° � �4��` .r.�' �',�i �.'fi � � � '' � ' 'i ��� r � �� ��'�'�� - } rhs�,� atA\' ` .:.�„�� � ���ng��r���ty� � 'I �ai �t!"r_4 � �f � � -� { a r+�Cs� t� �1 r � !�'. Q`1 �� �,�� ,r�`i , ;� + � °� -m � �M� `�'��� '� a.. �. _`��' _ �� �'t. 'I ;� x f 4 � 4✓ a rt' ,r i ,< r Rr � s_ u �i. � i r t fq 1",}e �T' ' � ,�+ ��.t E.� t��- ,� p Z �� � �' �'� � '~� ,� �'�'' � � a 6 �lr F :� '1 � 6 - ' � � � r! _2 d`G� � 'r! �if I . t .s� � h � I , � I�` r ei4•,,��°>{''�� �tr��a '�'�Y�; ` F,� ����� '��` .�`� h ' . ��J t a �£l d '�*� M c.� �x . �j. Y� ri- ,� f t r +'�' .. q' ��i e �k . r � � r° . : a �. �' < .it � �^ � ��r� 1y� �r.;a,� �y, }.,�,,•. F w : � t {, . . r t� r t {'` ji � 4. ��'. � v . , ,�,.a ,�G`! ��Y�'� c' - x5� �.. 2�4�� !� 'l'_ '' - � b'_ L' FP�'- `p �5.4'�' 9 � �. �� �-°•rr � � . . � �+ � � ti y �, !� 4 r : '?� �. f � a �� � {� � R y� et � _, F . , �r jF� , i ✓ � r.'R 'KS. h • d " 2.r � . S�il' i Q� '� IF � C f 4' 1' 'S� E. � 1 R �ys y 4 .. ft ';s ° � - k�i • ..�Y „'an„+ ¢"".<,� E �,.ir M .�,. � ,� ��s.p � ; �,. _�,.� ��.,�� �-._ � `'•� �,� *i J- �'-vPE' P ; .t � s� � ', . � . �F ��T'� a I E , � '�e � � „#��r?4. �'°i 1 .,v •,��,. � g i � � ! _ -'"' �r �, �. �- �r �. y .L+f � ,� µ as �r ' rr r ! � ? �" M: R' F" � ,'� .' .K � d. •�. �` r �� �� e��t� � � �f �..� � sg . � � '� �� r �s -.�*� � d � � y �r e Ci� . -�. �" r w�v a±� � r- ^e� u;. aA � R �; � 4 ,�. •' r r -r � �� � e� � i� � �"..2 L.R�r +. � ���'k:•c� � .'1�? �;r � � • ' �`!`' '��` �� ,�'. . Cy�f 't a: ,`���f:��`� r�:�i � a�` � . f f a ' µ K � ; > r,� � � - � , �.t ,€, ��.�� ` � ,�, 4 ��r xF F-� ax�' r��' �s,� �• �' � .� t- s� �+•• .aa. . �� a��F ] � .�. � a ' ' 4rt,Fr,l �,,.i'���:•,.hr � .�� � . �.�� . � s�a!IS ��:^♦ � 4�i �-� O `�`° �a ��r��S� '� � '� fv � 'r :���#" �' � �6'•�fM - *�' sa t �+,c � �_ { .i F � �� ,�• ' ,w"'� � .' � �„er..' � `�9 u G '+ r "1�s`.R f ` �' . w �IF' . 'xr� �, '� �r. �'�yr""` {�� � � S." f� � L F ! aK r �a � -'t-� ;�i��� :� r [r , �'°�a�°'." s `° '�'_ # ��a� �� ��i��i �f�i,Ec� ° � .. =t - i� e wC F t � d. ^�. x p Ik 5 ����1 h�'�5� .�1 i ��#�� f„-a "'� s'&+. F+ `�' , . ��� s�°`�`��: ��.��,¢ ���t.." K���� '�e���a�' � S � s S3. � � !r,- S"r�1��. � ��`ff '� b,E w r "S� �' �+i�I3* _y't '� t h ��d 7 osi , � i c 1 ; 'r° �' �5.� � . .:.ir 'E �� 01 � � n' � s', r t.T . Py. �. � c � r ` ..``�' t`.fd^ E�� � '; 'r3l �;�* � � j ' *:� ��. �. �t t � rs ' ° ' �m•�. ,. , , q, � 0 w. �'' �" ► T `i� 9 � '� . } � '� A �,, '"' b►►' '�t x �' [F a1 ' : ��' � 1' ��'s �i�� + � . �. � � � � �' �C 4 ,� s � - �r krt �. 's ,�rg� , ��' r �+ �:'r�. ` -f �, c rF�.�,,,�,. �, ` ��•i� ��,,$� ��n�F�.'v, ' �.-.`� ,�' �2 f�u�f ��- 'r�' :y �C� g�� ,�r-s ��'t ' ' �,: ,_ � 'd„'�`� 'M . d �' �+6,. � ° . �, . .� i� h •.,:' � s .° t,_ 4g lY �3 � � u� T .s� 'P' j. � �'. _ '� F � a �q�.�� ..: � Y. �s'�� .� ' � ..=: 5`� � ..�k' x _. p � r �, r7�p� �.� 'd t�i Y � r � �-� �sr . � :,,�`iF� j " ' � . e ,e ►�y`, �� �,n���st�� � 4 �*� r t,.,� � R�•T� �,'. . ri�r�r.�, k��Fk�C�r PIi C � ��� { s a' l i f 5 * S� � 1} I A.. ... k � �' � 7 ' ��'�7r �' �l ��� Y s 3, � . N F - y l . . t , q ��'� ' "' �7� f { �f Y a . � � ! .« "� �4� t�*� � r T a :��� a�.Y e��� . t � �' �'.f dF ' � Y1k ��c.Pt� r N5�4�'�F +� g '�'i JF ^� � �` . a g°� : � � _" � rti _ ! ^� , r - �.: * �+'� � � �� i er� �'� � � r: ld �1' {C � 1E V ' � �; d r 'i.� s� �, ti i' t s �� �;- �, - -��, r'�'" e � ro " � > � � � e L + � � � � � ^° � t tN�p k.. � Fi �. '�'!4 � � k r�. y, �'����,�s 1 7 , ��+: � s� � �, � �� t'� j� �, �,. I�''it �.�.� �f��l� ��c r � iJ,� �' i : �' h v'Y�1�' _. �,. .. {(�� ! �';' "j Y r � f ;'9'r� ., .Y-� �" 1f , . �� � .�..�A..: ._. ' � � ��. .. _ � . ., - ��TRM . f � 13� . �. v �'G'��� � t .��. ,k . Proposed Verizon & AT&T Cell Site � Repeaters & Microcells- various locations I I � I � I 95 I � Aitachment 9 CITY OF CIJPEItT'II�O 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, Califo�rua 95014 (408) 777-3262 To: Planning Commis�ion Co1in Jung, 5enior Planner From: Rod Livingood Technology, Information & Communications Comin.ission (TICC) Date: May 5, 2011 Subject: Comments on Referral of Proposed Verizon Wireless and AT&T Mobility Collocated Personal Wireless Service Facility at 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive, Cupertino We discussed last night at the TICC meeting and the following considerations need to be made. Before approval, consideration needs to be made for noise abatement. ATT did not subrnit a noise engineering study which is required. Additionally, the co-location of two equiprnent areas within close proximity increases the total ambient noise. �Terizon had requested variance on noise alone and combined the noise level is expected to exceed the noise regulations. Peter, I and others both staff and TICC thought this needs to be resolved. 96 CITY OF CLJPEIt'I'II�10 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (40�) 777-3262 To: P1aiu1ulg Coizunission Colin Jung, �enior Planner From: Peter Friedland, Chair Technology, Information �z Communications Coinini��ion (TICC) Date: April 28, 2011 Subject: Comments on Referral of Proposed Verizon Wireless and AT&T Mobility Collocated Personal Wireless Service Facility at 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive, Cupertino I have reviewed all the documents concerning the Deep Cliff application. I support the applications and exception strongly for the following reasons: 1. The area is a particularly bad one for current coverage as documented by the TICC survey. 2. The new tower replaces an existing one with a design that I believe is esthetically considerably more pleasing. 3. The residents of Deep Cliff, as represented by their governing board (whose chair appeared personally at TICC meeting to request TICC assistance in improving their cell phone coverage), support the new tower. 4. The tower will contain antennas for both AT�iT and Verizon, the two major carriers for the city of Cupertino. Peter Friedland Chair, TICC 97 A�:��,��i� 10 City of Cupertino tl Planning I�eparhnent 10300 Torre Avenue Ct�pertino, California 95014 Attn: I�Ir. �olin Jun�, �en�or ]Plariner It�: �lerizon i�Tireless 'Teleconununication Facility Installation in C I��ar Colin: �Te az°e pleased to report that with an �6% posi�ive vote, the Rancho Deep Cliff I�OA has approved the Option and Land Lease Agreerrient with Verizon �1Vir�less, which will allo� a ne�v t�lecommunicatian facili� to be built in our Comrr�on Area. V47e request that the following Conditions of l�t��roval b� included in any and all City permits issued for tl�s project. l. The �1ZW concrete pad and ground equiprnent needs to be lowered to the paved : sidewalk level in the Cognmon Ar�a adjacent to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff I�rive, This �quipment (ex�luding tl�e Collocatable Nlonopine T'ower) is to be enclosed within a wooden fence. 2. The City will mo�itor the equipment nois� level �n �t the IZancho I�eep Cliff proparty line to the norti� to �nsure that tl�e equipment rneets all City ordinanc�s arid r�gulations cove�ing daytirne a.nd �v�nin� r�oise levelse Vexizon is to add any addit�onal noise buffer�ng if th� homeowners listed b�lo�r are mater�ally affect�d by increased noise levels due smlely to cell phone to�ver equipment. All costs r�lated to noise aneasurements and mitigation measures shall b� borne by the installer, 3. IJpon completion of in�tallation, �I�rizon is to provide ENIig rnea�ur�ments � microwatts per square c�n�imeter �.t the addresses listed below. If the measurements ex�eed the levels defined in the I� e�t and Edison, Iric report dated 6417�1 l, �Ierizor� vv�11 complete at theit° cost the �ecessary a�aodification� to the ce11 phon� tawer equipment to meet that standard. 22395 Rancho Deep Cliff ��ive 22415 lt�.ticho I�eep ClifF '�r� 22435 cho I�eep Cli#'f l�rive 22455 Tlancho I�eep Cliff I���ve 22456 lZancho l�eep �liff I�r�ve I'lease be sure that the�e �eq�irements are included in the Cit�r Per�at for this irastalla�ior�. Sinc�rely, ! , '�, I��r�nefla �. Naylo�, Pr�sident Igancho Deep C1iff I�orneovaners Association i i 98 Aitachment 11 CITY OF CUPERTINO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27,1973, and amended on March 4,1974, January 171977, May 1,1978, and July 7,1980, the following described project was granted a Mitigated Negative Declaration by the Planning Coinmission of the City of Cupertino on October 25, 2011 I'IaO�EC'I' I3ESCRII�'I'IOIV A�iD LOCATIOI� Application No.: U-2011-07 ASA-2011-09, EXG2011-07, V-20ll-01, TR-2011-12 (EA-2011-06) Applicant: Chip Griffin for Ridge Communications Location: near 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive DISCRE'TIONAIZY ACTIOI� REQLTEST' Use Permit to replace an existing television lattice tower with a new personal wireless service facility consisting of 6 panel antennas mounted on a collocatable 70 foot monopine and an associated equipment enclosure at a Planned Residential Development (Rancho Deep Clif�; Architectural and Site approval for a new personal wireless service facility consisting of 6 panel antennas mounted on a collocatable 70 foot monopine and an associated equipment enclosure at a Planned Residential Development (Rancho Deep Clif�; Height Exception to allow the antennas of a new personal service facility to be mounted at a height of 64 feet where 55 feet is allowed; Variance to allow a personal wireless service facility mast to be setback 8 feet from an abutting residential property where 75 feet is required; Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal and replacements of 1 45" diameter Monterey Pine tree and 2 Chinese Pistacehes to facilitate the construction of a personal wireless service facility FIllTDI10TG5 OF DECI�IOI\TMAKING BODY . The City Council granted a Mitigated Negative Declaration since the project is consistent with the General Plan and there are no significant environmental impacts. The applicant shall adhere to all of the conditions required by the Planning Coirunission on October 25, 2011 including but not limited to: 1) Mitigation efforts to reduce visual impacts, such as landscaping in lieu of vinyl slants in the chain-link fencing; and transitioning height of wing wall next to masonry wall 2) If there are futuxe noise disturbances, applying additional noise mitigation to rneet City noise standards � 3) Submission of struchxral calculations/analysis reports for seismic and wind loads 4) Post-construction radio frequency energy testing report Aarti Shrivastava Director of Community Development C�Id'TIFICATE O� TI�E CITY CLEIZIC This is to certify that the above Mifigated Negative Declaration was filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on I � City Clerk 99 CITY OF CUPERTINO � RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE May 19, 2011 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the Crty of Cupertino on May 19, 2011. PIZOTEC'I' DE�CRIPTIOIlT AND LOCt�TION Application No.: U-2011-07, ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-07, V-2011-01, TR-2011-12 (EA-2011-06) i Applicant: Chip Griffin for Ridge Communications Location: near 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST Use Permit to replace an existing television lattice tower with a new personal wireless service facility consisting of 6 panel antennas mounted on a collocatable 70 foot monopine and an associated equipment enclosure at a Planned Residential Development (Rancho Deep Cliff); Architectural and Site approval for a new personal wireless service facility consisting of 6 panel antennas mounted on a collocatable 70 foot rnonopine and an associated equipment enclosure at a Planned Residential Development (Rancho Deep Cliff); Height Exception to allow the antennas of a new personal service facility to be mounted at a height of 64 feet where 55 feet is allowed; Variance to allow a personal wireless service facility rnast to be setback 8 feet from an abutting residential property where 75 feet is required; Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal and replacements of 1 45" diameter Monterey Pine tree and 2 Chinese Pistacehes to facilitate the const�uction of a personal wireless service facility �IIVDINGS OF T�IE ElVVIROI�TMENTAL I�E`7IE�V COIVIIViI'I"I'EE The Environrnental Review Coininittee recommends the granting of a Mitigated Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and is deterrnined to be insignificant. i ��=��� � ��` � � g '/ J _ /J >°-,�� d N`lf��" �i.1� � . Aarti Shrivastava Director of Community Development . � g/erc/REC EA-2011-07 100 � City of Cupertino , 1 C1300 Torre A�enus ' � Cupertino, CA 95094 (408) 777-3308 ; FAX {4Q8) 777-3333 Community Development Department �N�f E L �, 1f -��tift � T'' L 1��aC.U�,�1 �HE�NC���� ; Staff Use C3nly EA Fiis No. EA-2D11-OB Case File No. U-2011-07, �A-2�311-09, EX�-2011- PRC)JECT DESCRIPT'ION; 7, U-2011-01, TR-2011-12 ; Proj�ct Tifle: Vs�i�on personal wireless service facility Proj�ct I�ocation: near 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Driv@ Project Descripti�n: Demolition of an existinq cable TV tower �nd the installa4i�n o� � personal wireless �ervice facilitv consi�tinq of six panel antennas mounted on a collocable 70-foot tall monopine and an associat�d �quipment enclosure. Environmental Setting: Common_interest area �f a planned residential development of - --- _ _ . _ � _ _ sinqle-familv detached homes. Area populated with non-nativ� trees and qround cover and surrounded by other residences. PROJE�T DESCRIPTtON: �ite Are� (a�.) - Building �overage - % �xist. �uilding - s.f. Prop�sed �Idg. - 0 s.#. Zon� - P(R1 C) qlanned sir�al�-fiamilv �.�. ���igr��tion - Low R�siden#ial cluster ��r��i#y R�sidential (1-5 c��a/a�) Asse�sor's Parcel No. -�56 02 - 0�2 If R�sidsntial, lJnits/�rgss Acre - -_ _-- T�#�[# ent�l/O�vn �cirrn� ����f �,fi Pri�� Unit Type #1 Unit Type #2 llnit Type #3 llnit Type #4 Unit Type #5 Ap}alicable �gaecial s4rea �lan�: (Check) L� Mon#a Vista Design Guidelins� CI S. Ds Anza Concepfual D IV. De Anza Conceptual ❑ S. Sara-S�anny Conceptual ❑ Stevens Crk Blvd. Conceptual ❑ Stevens Creek �Ivd. SW & Landscape If Non-Re�idential, �cr�l€lin� Are� - 0 s.fi. F�,i2 - Ma�c. Employees/�hif� - Parking Required n/a Parking Provided n/a Projec� Site i� �Ilithin Cupertino lJr4aan Service Ar�a - YES � NO ❑ 101 I lTf�[. 'Ck1��f E1��� �1 �' A. cu�E�roNO �E�� L��,� �ou�c�� D. oursiDe ��e�ci�s (continued) 1. Land Use Element 26. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 2. Public Safety Element 27. County Parks and Recrea4ion Department 3. Housing Element 28, Cupertino Sanitary District 4. Transportation Element 29. Fremont Union High School Districf 5. Environmental Re�ources 30. Cupertino Union School District 6. Appendix A- Hillside Developmen4 31. Pacific Gas and Electric 7. Land Use Map 32. Santa Clara County Fire Department � 8. Noise Element Amendment 33. County Shenff 9. City Ridgeline Policy 34. CALTRANS 10. Constraint Maps 35. County Transportation Agency 36. San#a Clara Valley Water District B. CUPERTIIVO SOURCE DOCUMENTS 11. Tree Preservation ordinance 778 E. OUTSIDE �,GE(UCY DOCUMENTS 12. City Aerial Photography Maps 37. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant i 13. "Cupertino Chronicle" (Califamia History Excesses �� Center, 1976) 38. FEMA Flood Maps/�CVWD Flood Maps ' 14. Geological Report (site specific) 39. USDA, "�oils of 5anta Clara Coun4y" 1�. Parking Ordinance 1277 40. County Hazardous Waste Management 16. Zoning Map Plan 77. Zoning Code/Specific Plan Documents 41. County Heritage Resources Inventory 18. City Noise �rdinance 42. Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel Leak Site C. CITY AGENCIES Site 43. CaIEPA Hazardous Was#e and 19. Community Development Dept. List �ubstances Site 20. Public Works Dept. 21. Parks & Recreation Department F. OTHER 5011RCE� 22. Cupertino Wa#er Utility 44�. Project Plan Set/Application Materials 45. Field Reconnaissance D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 46. Experience vvlproject of �imilar 23. County Planning Department scope/char�cter�stics ; 24. Adjacent Cities' Planning Departments 47. A�AG Prajection Series 25. County Departmental of Environmental Health iNST�tJ�Tf�t�a ; A. Complete all information requested on the Initial Study Cover page. L VE �LAN�( SP�ICES ONLY VIIHEN �► SPECIFIC ITEfV11S NOT i4PPL.IGe4BL�. . �. Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete, the checklist information in Categories A through O. G. You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such source� are used, job in their title(s) in the "Source" column ne� to the question to which they relate. D. If you check any of the "YES" response fio any questions, you must a4fiach a sheet explaining the potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed. E. When explaining any ye� re�ponse, label your answer clearly (Example "IV - 3 Historical") Please try to respond concisely, and place as many explanatory responses as possible on each paqe. F. Upon comple4ing the checklist, sign and date the Preparer's Affidavit. G. Please attach the fallowing materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City. ✓Project Plan Set of Legislative Document ✓Location map with site clearly marked (when applicable) 102 EV Ll1A°Ti0 F !/l � E TAL I P Cl'S: ��� � � o � � �.� � IS�UES: � � � � � � � °� ~ "'� �. ° � [a�d upportin In rrnatiore our��s] � � � � � � � o � � � a� �cr� � ��_ _ I. AE�TIiE°fIC -� �uld fih� projectm j a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a ❑ ❑ ❑ ; scenic vista? [�,�,��,�� ,4�A � � � b) Substantially damage scenic resources, ❑ ❑ ❑ including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic h [�,9,� `i,24 c) Substantially degrade the existing visual ❑ ❑ ❑ character or quality of the site and its surroundings? [� , � � 19,44] d) Create a new source of substantial light or ❑ ❑ ❑ glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? [1,1 �,�4] � Ic) The personal wireless service facility has the potential to degrade the existing residential visual character of the area. T'he monopole vvill be de�igned to simulate a pine tree with faux bark and arfificial branches to screen the panel antennas, which will also be camouflaged with needle socks. The monopine will be sited among other trees as depicted in the visual simulations. The fence �vill be renovated and new trees planted fio screen the monopine and equipment from the views of ad'acent residential��erties. � II. �4(3RICULTIJRE F2E�OURCES: ln � determining whether impacts to agricuftural I resources are significant environmental � �fFects, lead agencies may refier to the � California Agricultural Land Evaluation and ; �ite Assessment �lodel (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation a� an optional model to use in asses�ing impact� on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Conver� Prime Farmland, Unique ❑ ❑ ❑ � Farmland, �r Farmland of Statewide Importanc� {Farrnland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resou�ce� Agency, fio non- agricultural u�e? [�, �,�9] b) C�nflict with exi�ting zoning for CI ❑ ❑ agricultural use, or a lnlilliam�on ,4ct contract? [�,�,��] --- -- - 1 -- - - ---. 103 � -� 0 � � � � � O � � � � � ISSl1ES: � w�— � � � � c � E— �_ � o � a� � �°° 3 �� �n°e [and Support�ng Information Sources] � g , � � a , :� � � a , E � i acn —�c� � �� � c) Involve other changes in the existing ❑ ❑ ❑ environment which, due 4o their lo�tion or nature, could result in conversion of Farrnland, to non-agricultural use? [��7 � � — — - — � III. AIR C�UALI"I°V — Where available, fihe significance criteria esfablished by fihe applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would th project: a) Conflict with or obsfruct implementation of ❑ ❑ ❑ � the applicable air quality plan? [�,37,�2, b) Violate any air quality standard or ❑ ❑ ❑ � contribute substantially to an existing or projected air qual ity violation? [S,�T,�2,�4] c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net ❑ ❑ ❑ increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air qualifiy standard (including releasing emi�sions which exceed quantitative thresholds for o zone precursors)? [4,3�,44] d} Expose sensifive receptors to substantial ❑ ❑ ❑ � pollutan� concentrations? [4,� �',��] e) Create objectionable odors �ffecting a Cl ❑ ❑ subs4antial number of people? [4,�7 Btfo �IOLOGICa4L RESOlJf2CES �� 1f1lould the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either ❑ ❑ ❑ directly or through habitat modification�, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status sp�cies in local or regional plans, policie�, or regulations, or by the California Department ofi Fish and Game or IJ.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [�,1�,�� b) Fiave a substantial adverse eifect on any ❑ ❑ ❑ riparian habitat or other �ensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the 104 O � � � � � O � � � � � � V � � q� +, � .� � t� t� IS�LlE�: �� �s3��' �c� °�' [and SupportAng Informz�t�on Sources] � � _ � � ' � � � � � � � California Department of Fish and Garne or 11S Fish and Wildlife S ervice? [�, � q,� �,��] c) Have a substantial adverse effect on ❑ ❑ ❑ � federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but nat limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other CYleanS? [20y36,4�] _ __.—'_— I ; d) Interfere substantially with the movement ❑ ❑ ❑ ' of any native resident or migratory fish or � wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery s�tes? [� � a � �,�� 9 ��] e) Conflict with any local policies �r ❑ ❑ ❑ ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? [� � ,1�,��] � f� Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural ❑ ❑ ❑ Community Gonservation Plan, or o4her approved local, regional, �r state habitat conservation plan? [5,`1�,26,�7] � -- --- 1/. GULT'Uft�4L RE�Ol1FtCE� �m 1fUould the roje�t: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in ❑ ❑ ❑ the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? [�,�3,41] b) Cause a�ub�tantial adverse change in ❑ ❑ ❑ the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? [5,�3,43] c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ❑ ❑ ❑ � � paleontological resource or site or unique g eologicfeature? [�,7� d) Disturb any human remains, including ❑ ❑ ❑ � those interred outside of formal cemeteries? L�,�J VI. E L Y � IL — ould the proj�ct; 105 0 � � � � � � � � � � � : I�SUE�: c � `� � � � � � � � � ° � [and Supqorting lnforrnation Source�] � �_ � � � � � � �,._ � ac� �r� � �s� � a) Expose people or s�ructure� t� poten�ial � substantial adverse effects, including the risk of l oss, injury or death involv i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ❑ ❑ ❑ _ � delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by th� State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? ' Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. [�„34�,�4] ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ [�,�,10,�4] iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ❑ �. ❑ ❑ �iquefaction? [2 iv) Landslides [2,�,1Q, ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the ❑ ❑ ❑ loss af topsoil? [� °i t�,�4] - I c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is ❑ ❑ ❑ � ( unstable, or that would become uns#able as � a result of the project, and potentially result ; in an- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, ; subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? � [� Q,�=3] I d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined ❑ ❑ ❑ , in Table 1�-1-B of the Uniform �uilding Code ; (19 7), creating �ubstantial risks to life or property? [�,�, � 0] e) Have soils incapable of adequately ❑ ❑ ❑ supporting the use of septic tank� or alternative waste water disposal sy�tems where sewers are not available for th� disposal of waste water'? [6,9,�6,39] � Vlai, ii, iii, iv) Ceology reporf prepared by �ea�n Geotechnic�l, Inc. and reviewed by City ' Geologist, Cotton Shires As�ociate�. Project site is a moderat�ly steep fill �lope. Area is in a geologic hazard zone (F zone), and i� situated between two potenfiially active traces ofi th� IVlonta Vista fault loc�ted about 450 feet to th� northeast and 320 feet to the sou4hwest of the project site. City Geologist recommends that prior to granting geotechnical clearance that construction plans for the foundatian and grading �how structural calculations thafi addre�� �nrind and seismic loading criteria, depict any required retaining walls, and evaluate geotechnical a�pects of the above plans. If piers are 4o be included as par� of the foundation desi n, minimum embedment depths should be s ecified. i 106 � � � i-' � '�' � �, � � �avc� �v °�,,�–� �v� a ' ISSUESe � � `� � � � �°� �!� � ° �. [a�nd Supporting Information Sour�es] � �, � � _ = � � � _ � � �� � �� � 1/9L H�►ZARDS -- H ARDOIJS — --------- ----- MATERIALS –14Uould the projec a} Create a signrficant hazard to the public or ❑ ❑ ❑ the environment through 4he routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materia [ 3 2,A C�,��,�3,�4] b) Create a significant hazard to the public or ❑ ❑ ❑ the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environ [32,4�,� c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle ❑ ❑ ❑ hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? [ 2,29,��,Q�f�,��] d) Be located on a site which is included on a ❑ ❑ ❑ list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Gov�rnrnent Code Section 65962.5 and, as a resul#, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the env ironment? [ e) For a project located within an airporfi land ❑ CI ❑ use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within twro miles of a public airpert or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or ' working in the project area? [] f� For a project r�ifihin the vicinity of a private ❑ ❑ ❑ air�trip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] g) Impair implementation of or physically ❑ ❑ ❑ �. inte�'ere with an adopted emerger�cy resp�n�e plan or emergency evacuation � plan? [2,32,�3 I h} Expose pevple or structures to a ❑ ❑ ❑ � significant risk of loss, injury or death involving vvildland fires, including vvhere �nrildlands are adjacent to urbanized area� or where residences ar� infiermixed uvith vvildland� y 2, ��] ------ – ---- ------ -- 107 0 ��� � � ��°' � �� � � � � � � ISSIJES: � � � � ,� � v � �° �,= � o � [and Supp�rting Inform�tion ources] � � _ °' � � � � � � _ _ � — 1/111. HYDROL�GY e4f�ID 1dVATEF2 QIJ�►L!� �----- - �m l�l�ulcl the projec#; � a} Violate any water quality standards or ❑ ❑ ❑ wasfie discharge requirernents? [��,��,��1 b) Substantially deplete groundwater ❑ ❑ ❑ supplies or interfere substantially wi4h groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support exi�ting land use� or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? [2�,3�,�2] c) 5ubstantially alter the existing drainage ❑ ❑ ❑ pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which wrould result in substantial erosion of siltation on� or off-site? [1�, �0 d) Substantially alter the existing drainag� ❑ ❑ ❑ pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or riuer, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site [2� �) Create or contribute runoff vrrater which ❑ ❑ ❑ would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or � provide substantial additional sources of p olluted runofF? [24,3�,4 f� Otherwise substantially degrad� water ❑ ❑ ❑ quality? [��,�6,3?] g) Place housing within a 100-year flood ❑ ❑ ❑ hazard area as mapp�d on a federal Flood Hazard �oundary or Flood Insurance Rat� IUlap or other flood hazard delin�ation map? [� ,��] h) F'lace v►rithin a 100-year flood hazard ar�a ❑ ❑ ❑ structures which would impede or redirec4 flood flowrs? [�,3�] 108 0 � � � � � O � � � � � � t� �! °� t1 g"++ � Cy tJ t� iSSIJES; � � c� �° 4 , � � O� � � � ° � [and �tapporting Inforr�tation Sour�es] � � _ � �� 3 � o � �� � � a� ��s � �c� i) Expose people or structures to a�ignificant ❑ ❑ ❑ risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam'? [�,��;��] j) Inunda4ion by seiche, tsunami, or ❑ ❑ ❑ mudflow? [�,3�,3�3] IXa LAPID 11SE s4N PLAiVNIfdG - ould th proj ect: a) Physically divide an established ❑ ❑ ❑ community? [7 b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, ❑ ❑ ❑ policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [1 c) Conflict with any applicable habitafi ❑ ❑ ❑ conservation pl�n or nafural community conservation plan? [1,5,6,9,2�] X. MIldERAL RES�URGES �m oul the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known ❑ ❑ ❑ mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the resident� of the �tate? [5 �] b) Result in the loss of availability of a ❑ ❑ ❑ locally-imporfant mineral resource r�covery site delineated on a lacal general plan, specific plan or other land u�e plan? [5,1 Q] X Io N �- 11Vould the garoject result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, ❑ ❑ ❑ noise lev�ls in exces� of standards established in the local general pl�n or noise ordinance, or applicable standard� of other agencies? [�, � �,��] b) Exposure of persons to or g�neration of ❑ C7 ❑ excessive grou vibration or 109 - O � � � � � A � � � � � iSSUE�o �� � I–� � o a-� � p c�a �� �'�3�� y .��. � [and Supp�rting Information Source�] � � � � � :� � � s� _ _ �� �� � J� i � � groundborn� noise levels? [�, � �,4�] — ----------- ----- � c) A substantial permanent increa�e in ❑ ❑ ❑ i ambient noise I�vels in the project vicinity r above levels existing �nrithout th� project? i [�, i �] i d) A substantial temporary or periodic ❑ ❑ ❑ � increase in ambient noise levels in the � project vicinity above levels existing without th project? [�,1 �, ��] e} For a projecf locat�d within an airport land ❑ ❑ ❑ use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [�,1 �3,44] fi� For a project within the vicinity of a private ❑ ❑ ❑ airstrip, would the project expo�e people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [�, � �] Xla) Charles Salter Noise Study determined that wall/fence surrounding the equipment enclosure must be raised to 9' 6" to mitigate noise to 55 d�A, the nighttime residential property line limit. Interior noise is calculated to be 42 dBA, uvhich is less than the 45d�A ma�cim limit. XIlo POPULATIO P�iVD ti IDSI G�� ould the projec#: a) Induce substantial population growth in an ❑ ❑ ❑ area, either directly (for example, by praposing n�w homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, thraugh ex�ension of roa or other infr�structure)? [3,1 �,� �, b) Displace substantial number� of existing ❑ ❑ ❑ � housing, nece�sitating the construction of replacement hou�ing elsewhere? [3, `t �,44] c) Displace substan4ial numbers of p�opl�, ❑ ❑ ❑ necessitafiing 4he consfiruction of replacement hou� �I se wh e r e? [3, � f ,��] XIIIe Pl! L,IC S R1/IC a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated vvith the provision of new or physicall altered 110 - — a i �,� �� �� � � � �� �� a� e��,� .� IS�tlES: � ��—, ea � � � � � � � � ° a a� � � 'c � �' �. � �c � [an� Supporting Inforrnatiore ��urces] � � _ �, � o� � .� — e� � �a c � e� governmental facilitie�, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the � construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain accep#able service ratios, response times or y other performancs objecfives for any of the � public services: � Fire prof ec4ion? [1 �,��,4�] --- --- ❑ ❑ ❑ � _ — -------------- ----- - ---- — i - --- - Poli p rotection ? [��,44] ❑ ❑ ❑ � s c�oo is? � ��,��,��� ❑ ❑ ❑ � Parks? [�, 3 7, � 9,� 1�2�,�7,4�] ❑ ❑ ❑ Oth publi facilities? [1 �,2c�, ❑ ❑ ❑ XI1/a RE -- a) Would the project increa�e the use of ❑ ❑ ❑ existing neighborhood and regional parks or ather recreational facilities such that subsfantial physical deterioration of the facilifiy would occur or be accelerated? [ � �, � � ,��,�7,��) b) Does the project include recreational ❑ ❑ ❑ facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical eff��t on the environment? [� � --- , . T N�PORTATIOIV/°rRAFFIC -- � Wo the proJ��tm ; i a) Cau�e an increase in trafFic �n+hich is ❑ ❑ ❑ j substantial in relation to the existing traffic I load and capacity of the sfireet system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? [�,�0,3�,��] b} Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, ❑ ❑ ❑ a level of �ervice standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highv�ay�? (� c) Result in a change in air traffic patt�rns, ❑ ❑ ❑ including eith an increas� in traffic levels or 111 O c� � � � � � � � � � � � v ISSIJESe �.�°�� �_��� �.�'�g °� [arad Suppor�in lnform�tion �our��sl A � � � c�, = � � a, � _ av� �r� � Je� a change in location that results in ' substantial safety risks? [�,�] � � - d) Sub�tantially increa�e hazards due to a ❑ ❑ ❑ design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., fiarm equipment)? [2{�,��,4�] ! e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ ' [� 9 `19, 32, 33,�4°] � --- --------------- ------ --- r -- — — ------- - - - � Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ ❑ � [1 �,�A] g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or ❑ ❑ ❑ programs supporting alfernative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [4,3�] XVL tJTILI°fIES e41VD SERVICE SVSTEt111S — vVo uld th proj a) Exceed wastevvater treatment ❑ ❑ ❑ �I requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? [ �,22, ��,3 �,�4] b) Require or result in the construction of ❑ ❑ ❑ new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construc;tion of which could cause significant environmental effec fis? [�6,22,2�,�6J c) Require or result in the construction of G7 ❑ ❑ new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of exi�ting facilities, th� construction of which could cau�e significant environm�ntal efifects? [� e) Result in a determination by the � ❑ � wastewater treatment provider which serve� or may serve the project thafi it has �dequate capacity to serve the projeet's projected � demand in addition to the provider's existing co mmitments? [�,��,2�,3�, ' ��e serv�d by a landfill with �ufficient ❑ ❑ C7 permitted capacity to accommodate the pro ject's � ol i d waste dispo needs? [�] g) Corrrply vvith fed�ral, state, and local ❑ ❑ ❑ 112 --� � i � --- - . -- -- -- ----- � � ( � .. I � V � � � ,� �j L � � v � 6�S1lES: � � `� � � � �� � � �, ° � [and Saappor�ing Inforrnation Source�l � � � � � = � �' � � _ � � �� � ��� statutes and regula4ions related to solid waste? [�l 113 II. A�1 ATO�Y FIN IfVGS C3F IG IFtCA�CE ( b e c�mpt�ted by City;S a) Does the project have the potential to ❑ ❑� �❑ � degrade #he quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below �elf-sus#aining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or anirnal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important exarr�ples of the major periods of California history or prehisto [] b) Does the project have impacts that are ❑ ❑ ❑ individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means #hat the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current project�, and the efiFects of probable future projects)? p c) Does the project have environmental ❑ ❑ ❑ �. effects which will cause substantial advers� effects on human being�, either directly or indirectly? [] PREPs41aER'S A��IDAVlT° I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the best of rny knowledge and belief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding accurately fio all quesfiions herein, and have consulted appropriate �ource references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. I hereby acknowledge than any �ubstantial errors dated within this Initial Study may caus� delay or discontinuanc� of r�lat�d proj�ct review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of such delay or discontinuance. Pr�parer's Signature � Print Preparer's Name Golin Jun� 114 VI EN7°AL EVALl1 TI (1°o be Cornpleted by City Staf� ENVIROid11�EIV1°�4L F�►CT"OR� POTENTiALLI( e4FFECi°�D: The environmental factors checked belo�r would be p�tentially affect�d by this pr�jeck, involving at least one impac# that is a"Potentially �ignificant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the follovving p�ges. Aesthefic� ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources Geology /Soils ❑ Fiazards & Hazardous ❑ Hydrology 1 Water ❑ Land Use / Planning i Materials Quality ❑ Mineral Resources � Noise ❑ Population / Housing � ❑ Public Services ❑ Recreafion ❑ °fransportation/Traffic ❑ Utilities / Service ❑ Mandatory Findings of Systems �ignificance DETERtNIN�►TIOId: On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Revievv Committee (ERC) finds that: ❑ The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ Although the proposed projecf could have a significant effect on the environrnent, there will not be a significant effecf in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I� The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ The proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant irnpact" or "potentially significan4 unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on #he earlier analysis as described on attached sh�ets. An ENVIRONIIAENTAL IIVtPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ Although the propos�d project could have a significant effect on the environm�nt, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLAf�TION pursuant fo applicable �tandards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigafied pursuanf to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitiga#ion measure� that are impo�ed upon 4he propo�ed project, nothing further is required. � 5/17/11 Staff Evaltaa Date � ,��'� �` i����1,'`�� �'',? ; r � 5/19/91 �RC Ch�irperson Date 115 - I - R �, I ;. -;�, , �� �,; :;, , i ' ., ii ,I � �� r il l i ' , � 1�t�ll t� r� r, n,' r ; � r � , 1 �rjl l��llll;�il �71 t � � � � � ; c � ,� I_ 1 j l � '� ' I;' l�i i � I, , � il I r l� ' r i�� rlI III�''( �I�IIf' � ' r��� I rll�i� J`11i{ �� � �I�1 J:I� i ' 1 � I l� i �li� Il �' � �i �(r, ,i�Il �i� i� :�I i�;! il� �� • —� — � i I7��' � �.i � I I ,�l' ll i �� !:, �,1 ���i{' � i: !�( � �; I r�i, � � . �. i i ' _ �. ' , � .. : � i �; ) ! � �I�� i ��'I�� �i � i '1 I �i� ,l �,���' ,1 � i ll�� �l ii �� �'�il . . ��rl _�'l;� 11 { i � ', " 'i� r �r�ll 'ii 7 � ir�" r'� i � 1 `i'i,i,i�i! ;lt�l�;l�lili�� f�,ii„� ,�„�,,; �� �jf���{' '�lill�jl71�11�� i,t.%�, ti,.,,,, I�I�����jllillllllflllllrfll;l�'11111,�1111�Nli�lll�iliill�l��rf��������������i���ia��iruiiiiii�iii����i�� �acent to anc o ee i rive J p u ert lno p � LOCATI ON M AP UKIAH J FRAI � -� =D� = c� _ �, -� -o =c> -m =D =z SANTA ROSA � YOUNTVILLE �NAPA 80 SACRAMENTO � 29 8 AN110CH 78 4 � ao 4 PITTSBURG 24 WALNUT CREEK LSOM VICINITY MAP � � a �#�, a' � -� � y S � � � � cv � m , � � � _ Mo�a �Nsta ;� Stevens ��reek SIVd __ � � '� . +r+ —. 85 c� 22�75 Raricho Deep Cliff Dr, ����pertino E A�e Cupertino, � CA 45014-3964 � : a �� N R����, �' N.T.S. � .� ��f s.e,wra cu►w► � tolumbus A�re y. couNrr��.Q` - � � � � E_ 4 � � �'�, �� �� 0° Rainbow Dr ��-� Rairbd+� a �� ' "',~: � Saratoga � � C92 U 1 U Mic ros oR Corp c3200 8 NOV hQ, a nd (arTel! ptla s, Inc . 8 DRIVING DIRECTIONS Total Distance: 58.2 Miles Start: Depart 2785 Mitchell Dr, Walnut Creek, on Mitchell Dr (West) LIVERMORE t: Tum LEFT (South-East} onta N�get Ln 0.3 2: Turn RIGHT (West) onto Ygnacio Valley Rd 3.0 OAKLAND 3: Take Ramp (LEFT) onto I-680 towards I-680 / San Jose 33. 4: Road widening between Milpitas and Sunol (SB) 5: At exit 12, turn RIGHT onto Ramp CA-262/Mission Blvd/I-880 6: Take Ramp (RIGHT) onto SR-262 Mission Blvd Wes/�-880/Warm Springs District / Uc Extension 1.0 7: Turn LEFT onto Ramp towards I-880 / San Jose 0.5 SAN JOSE 8: Toke Ramp (LEFT) onto I-880 towards I-880 / San Jose 3.4 9: Take Ramp (RIGHT) onto SR-237 towards CA-237 / MTN View 10: At exit 16, take Ramp to SR-85 CA-85/CA-82 S/Los Gatos Santa Cruz 4.5 to 11: Turn RIGHT onto Ramp towards Stevens Creek Boulevard 0.3 4 12: Turn RIGHT (West) onto Stevens Creek Bivd 1.0 N 13: Turn LEFT (South) onto S Foothill Blvd 0.5 14: Road name changes to Stevens Canyon Rd 0.2 N.T.S. �5: Turn LEFT (East) onto Rancho Deep Cliff Dr < 0.1 End: Arrive 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Dr, Cupertino, CA 95014-3964 VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT ENGINEER: SIGNATURE DATE VERIZON WIRELESS CONSTRUCTION: Attachment 12 SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE PROPERTY OWNER: RIDGE COMMUNICATIONS - LEASING SIGNATURE DATE SIGNATURE RIDGE COMMUNICATIONS - CONSTRUCTION RIDGE COMMUNICATIONS - 20NING SIGNATURE DATE I SIGNATURE REVISI ONS DESCRIPTION 0 80�ZD 0 909'ZD 10 95�ZD 10 95�ZD Rev A 10 100%ZD i0 100%ZD Rev A i0 100%ZD Rev B 11 1007ZD Rev C 11 100�ZD Rev D 11 100qZD Rev E � � � 0 o. � N� CODE COMPLIANCE AL� WORK AND MATERIALS SHAIL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLIOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES. 1. CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (INCLUDING TITLES 24 & 25) 2. 2010 CA�IFORNIA BUILDING CODE 3. 2010 CAUFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE 4. 2010 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE 5. 2010 CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC CODE 6. 2010 COUNTY ORDINANCES ACCESSIBI�ITY REQUIREMENTS: FACIIITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, TITLE 24, PART 2, VOLUME 1, CHAPTER 11, SECTION 1103.1.1, EXCEPTION 1. gEFORE Yo ti G V P�' o �i Under ground Service Alert of Ca+trd/North�m CdHomla CALL• TOLL FREE 1-800— 227— 2600 BUILDING/SITE DATA LEGEND 0 • 2 LOT 24, TRACT No. 5691 SITE No. 193868 ZONING: PR1C 0.2 9.4 LATITUDE N 37' 18' 38.80 LONGITUDE W 122' 04' 09.40" (NAD 83) PROJECT DESCRIPTION REMOVE (E) UNUSED TOWER REPLACE WITH NEW (P) 7�' COLOCATABLE MONOPINE WITH ANTENNAS AT 62'. (P) LEASE AREA 727 SQ FT WITH 8' FENCE. A(P) CMU WALL FOR GEN PLUG NEXT TO (E) DRIVEWAY. ACCESS WILL BE A WALKING PATH. (15) PANEL ANTENNA AND (2) 6" GPS ANTENNAS W�� L+�Of PROJECT DATA °° � � ° � Zo � � APPLICANT: VERIZON WIRELESS WALNUT CREEK EXECUTIVE PARK 2785 MITCHELL DRIVE BLDG #9 WALNUT CREEK, CA 94598 CONTACT: JIM GRAHAM (925) 279-6333 AGEN T: RIDGE COMMUNICATION, INC. 12667 A�COSTA BLVD. #175 SAN RAMON, CA 94583 CONTACT: SUE FINCH (925) 519-5706 OWNER: RANCHO DEEP CUFF HOMEONWERS ASSN. 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 CONTACT: SAUL HOFFMAN (408) 446-3369 L. l� JTROBEL �, O. 1 NC. DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION ! 4 _ � - --L---� . o � � caa CONMU 022 SHARY CIRCLE, SUITE 9, CONCORD, CA. 94518 PHONE: 925-686-3241 FAX: 925-686-3350 VERIZON WIRELESS REAL ESTATE: � ��y 0. �� SIGNATURE No. CA45145 � Exp. 3/31/73 ♦ i. VERIZON WIRELESS RF ENGINEER: �� c� � �U� � W W CIVIL ENGINEER: �.D. STROBEL C0. INC. o��= c� Z~ U 1022 SHARY CIR. SUITE 9 � v n� Q N� S CONCORD, CA 94518 W�n d. �- � op CONTACT: LARRY STROBEL N 3 c U� � N� (925) 686-3241 � Z � CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: Q /� � RIDGE COMMUNICATION, INC. 12667 ALCOSTA BLVD. #175 Q �_ SAN RAMON, CA 94583 CONTACT: KEITH SCHMID � O � (408) 679-1141 � � � � C� z � Q� � _ ,--' � W � � a U w � � � � � w� o SHEET INDEX o � a " 0. , � T-1 COVER SNEET: PROJECT TITLE, MAPS, AND INFORMATION � � C-1 SURVEY �- A-1 OVERALL 51TE PLAN A-1.1 SITE PLAN � A-2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN A-3 ELEVAl10NS � L-1 LANDSCAPWG FILE: 4299- T-1 MADE IN U.S.A. D�1 �� M/� / / 5 , ' '' / `\` `\` �� �T I ����i�� � ,_ `�\ 1 � , ` ��.�J /` �� � \ �\ ` \ / �� / � - `�_ ,_ , I \, � , ! I > > �� _ ,� / , _ � 1 � i �� � TRA CT +`� `� �� � � �� � � /NO_ � , �\, � 3 \ �, / � s>, oeep _\_` � c� � �–�� , .� �,� �— _ --� ��,�� ��-, ' e � � ' � ��� �� � � � � � � �, S T � �ES �� �P9 � I � ir� �\ ` �._ / t LOT 2 r � � , ` — ��� / . � ,' � �, � � �v � � � ' ' � T ^� o. . �� L , _ � 3 / I \ \��\ � \`1 �� � / \ � / � \ � �_ LOT 3 . � - � /� ' � �� . ., , _ __ ,, ,. , _ I � \�� �� '�� • , �� � � � i ���_ \ �� ` / � � ` ' � � � V � \ �'-� � �� / LOT 4 � ._ .. � � , , � , - - T- � _ � � � � � � ��� � � � � � ` ` \\ \` ` ' � � ` � � � �` � � \\\\ \ \���\` \ LOT 5 i LOT 6 � " � ` ` � � ` ` SITE MAP LOT 23 �� �� � COMMON AREA � Oer�rsoF� \ � � \ � ���� � - ... � � LOT 24 � � � � � � ` \� ��� � � \���� � I LOT 7 � � / TRACT NO. 5691 � � � � � .r ��� � � L O T 8 / \ J � i ( � � � � ��� � ����� / � � � i I � � ` � � � ? � ��` � � � - � `� �oT 22 i �oT 20� i � ���, �� `�,, - _ _ Ji �• � � g , \ � /�� Q/ / ` �� \ � ����` LOT 9 , � n � ` / � �' /� � � ' ae / / � � \��� \ \�� � � LOT 11 � LOT '121 � \ `� � �/ � j / `����` \ \��� � LOT 1 O / � � / � � � / � � � �� � � � � L O T 21 1 / � � � � � � - .,. I � j � / LOT '1 8 / / �� �� � / / � , � ��� �� � / O / � � � \ , 1 � _ / � � � \ / � `�� \ / . - � - - " _ � � 7 LOT 1 7 � ��_ _--- __ -_ . �� i �� � \ _�-- � ' / / LOT 1 9 � � LOT 'I 6� ���� � _ _ __ � / � ` � ���� ` - _ _ . - i� � � �� __� � _�- ' ' J " I � ` � , , r------- � � � � 1 35.00' YNDE / / ROAD RIGHT OF WA� / � i I I — — � � (370 MAPS 42) / � � � `� � � /� ►LOT '13 / I __ / / ~- - - �� �� ,` L O T '1 4 ` � / i � / / ` _� � 1 � � � � Y % / � �' � � EXCEPTION TO P.S.E. � � / � I ( � � / � � i / � � � � i � � � � / � I I � � � / LOT '{ 5� ` � % / i / / i � � �'_ -- ! ( ` / ~ �_ / � / -- __ / / � �� �� � / ` � / % �� �\ � �i I � ` � \ �� \ ��f / \ � ` �` �� �\ � �/ � � � � � � � i � � � 10.00' YMOE� \��\�� / ANITARY SEWER EASEMENT \� � � (370 MAPS 42) �� � � // \� `� �/ / � �� � I / � 15' MADE INGRESS Qc / EGRESS EASEMENT �/ I RANCHO �EEP CLIFF FUTURE UN{TS NO. 2 AND 3 �` ��Z990.R.141) � � . • ,� � ' GRAPHIC SCAI.E � � � a s �s �e w I ` � / / � � i 1 fnoh � 10 R � I � . , �,° `""° S� .V � G` � K' !�►q}- v � t� No. 7900 � EXP.12/31/it � 9 � � �' CA���� W J_.l _l J J J J oW���� � W W W W� W W N a�������� � 0 W W W W W W W Z N�aaaaaaa O o � W W W W W W W N � � � � � � � � J W � 193868 WEST CUPERTINO 22475 RANCHO DEEP CUFF DR. CUPERTiNO, CA 95014 )RA1NN: OATE:03 28 11 108 N0. 10-05! iHEET N0. C 1 (SHEET 1 OF 2) BWNDARY SHOWN IS BASED ON RECORO INFORMATION AND FWND MONUMENTATION. THIS iS NOT A BWNDARY SURVEY. PROPERTY LINES SH01NN ARE APPROXIMATE. SITE MAP --- VIqN(TY MAP rror,o.r�.e � PROPOSED 727.11 t ti � / / � / SQ. FT. LEASE AREA / � § e5 . . w.w�,�.dRa / J6"REDWYJ00 �� �N COMMON AREA �E) BUILDING � � / � _ - � �' �" .... ��� ADJACENT TO LATI?l1DE dc LONqTUDE � �.�F,�, �� EL=51�J� AMSL � TAKEN HERE � L / � �"" � HT=60.8� AGC APN 356-02-032 -• � , -,, 37'18 •as.o,-�N,�,o z>> � � SANTA CLARA - I \\\ , 1 I I / 1 �� 122'04'05.54'(NAD 27) � � t f . � i \ R o ����` � 37'18'38.80'(NAD 83) � (E) BUIIDiNG �� 1 CQ��Y � _ � \ L s . u .I 122'04'09.40'(NAD 83) � � �t . �-;. � ' � / � / / \ ".; � / A P N ' � � . � _�� � \ / `356 ��� % I �� ..K� es , s��:� $ � � '' . p _� . , , , I ___\ 15" PINE ` O c � O ��`` � � � � .. _ - �. •r � � __� CL—s83.1'AMSL v7 �� � ',v, .. v� ,,�-2�.9 ,�� ��� I I 3 5g / � m �� P � �5" a�Ne ANTENNA TOWER �� � , � 0 -. EC=490.9' AIIS[ EL�514.9' AMSL �`s� � 4 � a :.wR�.� � !I J � \�\1�II�I//� HT-3J.2�AGL HT �SB.O� AGL J ! \O �'� ene«ean O� � +, � s.ed� 64'.) -r 9 -: �� �� �urr eox / / : a� - . .. � . � % — ��� ��' � � , � _ / / / �✓ �_ � �, l//// Zf" P/NF f l . � ' CENTERLINE � � OF PROPOSED — �� 1 �\� HT56J8' ACL � � i ,;� �PRQJECT b 2'NADE ELECTRIC a �,�� � �✓��/,� \\�.� \ � � ,,,.� � LOCAl10N � ROUiE / p ` ��'��li �\�� ' rn � �\ //�/�- � � / ' ^ � � S ° —=-� `�'� - , _ l '�.1ENERA� N�TES' I.ANO � ' �sf, ; � . � r� -- —` o (P) NEW WALL 8Y OTHERS `��� 1`_ I I ' ``� / � K. S �`�e` CENTERUNE OF p �/ ��� �\� I I��� � PROPOSED 9 ' / M� � I ` � � \� \ ' %/ � / PROPERTY INFORMATION v \�� yq�.� � � \ 24 " P/N£ � � MADE ACCESS � \ \\\� ��\\ � /// ` r � OWNER: RANCHO DEEP CUF HOMEOWNERS ASSN. � ROUTE � \ � ` \\ \ \ //� � AOORESS: 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFf DRIVE M \ \\\� \\ , I ��- � ` � CUPERTiNO. CA 95014 * No. 7900 * � w � w P 1 � �� ��\\ � � � � EXP.12/31/11 � �- � `�— ` SIiE: YVEST CUPERTiNO � �P �� � �` 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DRIVE ' Q�� JOINT UTIUTY � '"' au � r �.� CUPERTINO. CA 95014 � �F CA��� DROP POLE - 'ELECIRIC �.� � ,�\\\ � UTiIITY 80X / � VAU �� `; � �\\� ��� ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: LOT 24, TRACT N0. 5&91 PACBELL 80X� � - ( �-' �j� � EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION: ELEY-461.2'tAMSL � ' //' ELECTWC ne£e `' ��. // \ S�GN VAULT � v�uL�T `•. �� CEN7ERLINE OF � w J �� J J � J / � � PROPOSED 5 WIDE LESSOR�S LECaAL DESCPoPT1ON Z 5 a a¢ a a a a � ` WALKING PATH � LEGAL DISCRIPTION IS FOUND IN NORTH AMERICAN TiTLE p w������� � � COMPANY 11iLE REPORT FlLE NUMBER 54606-1065838-11, �� W W W W W W W � � ` (E) BUIIDING \ DATED fEBRUARY 14, 2011. a � � � � � � � � � � \ � EIECTRIC E L= 4 7 0. 2' A M S L � ( n � 0 w w w w W w w � � VAULT H7�13.2' AGL � THE LANO REFERRED TO IN SAID REPORT IS SITUATED IN THE Z� a a a a a a a \\ / PACBELL �� CITY OF CUPERTiNO, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF w 0 \\�\ DRIVEWAY ^, O W > > > > > > > VAULT \ CAUFORNIA. �� w w W W W w w \ � � � � (n d' �' Q Q' d' �' � � � � \ \ /��� � � - �T1TLE REPORT w `� /\\\ �� � O / TIiLE REPORT WAS AVAILABLE AT THE T1ME OF FlELD SURVEY. � TITLE REPORT PROVIDED BY NORTH AMERICAN 11TLE COMPANY o o O O O O O� �\\ \\ / / / N I FEBRUARY�14, 2pj � NUMBER 54606-1065838-1 t, DATED � O O � r� r i O �� \ � Q � I Q M.- N � N M O N � �� o , � , �� � � ,�'� BA313 OF BEARiNC ° � `° `° '' � � N "' 00000��o � , Q BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON U.S. STATE PIANE p � N r ,� ���^� � \� \ � � NAD83 COORDINATE SYSTEM STATEPUINECOORDINATEZONE � Z �_ �` �I / � ry OETERMINEO BY GPS OBSERVATIONS. '''��`�`�/ \\� C TERUNE OF � � � O : C T R I C V A U L T / \ P R O S E O 2' W I D E \ �� Z' � BENCHMARK COMMON AREA � \ T E L C O R O U T E / � O ELEVAl10NS BASED UPON GPS DERIVED ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHTS, / \\ \ `� �• � L O T 2 4 � APP LYIN G G E 0 1 0 9 9 S E PA R A l 1 0 N S, C ON S T R AI NI N G T O N G S � ' � C O N 1 R O L S T A T 1 0 N ' L U T Z' E L 4 5 0. 0' A M S L ( N A V D 8 8). � \\ \ � � � TRACT NO. 5691 � // I \\\ \ � . � � l!� � I J6' R£OMt9GY7 • � / � Q . OOD ELEVATION \ \ / FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION OF PROJECT AREA IN ZONE X, AREAS \ `� � � P L O T 2 qiANCE FLOOD WITH OEPTHS THAN 1 F00T � � \ / OR NATH DRAINAGE AREAS LE55 THAN 1 SQUARE MILE; AND � \ ��_ / ! AREAS PROlECTED BY LEVEES FROM iX ANNUAL CHANCE f100D, \ \ \ v AS SHOWN ON FEMA FlRM MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER \ � 08085CO212H, DATED MAY 18, 2009. ` \ � 3URNEY DATE � � \ \ � \ 04/28/10 � _ _ s��YO��s n�o�s � � � \ _�� ALL EASEMENTS CONTAINED NATHIN SAIO TITLE REPORT \ \ \ �'� AFFECTiNG THE IMMEDIATE AREA SURROUNDING THE LEASE HAVE \ � BEEN PLOTTED. SURVEYOR HAS NOT PERFORMED A SEARCH OF \ � PUBUC RECOROS TO DETERMINE ANY DEFECT IN TITLE ISSUED. � \ THE BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON IS PIOTTED FROM RECORD � \ \ INFORAIATION AND OOES NOT CONST1iUTE A BOUNOARY SURVEY \ \ _ `_ OF THE PROPERTY. \ � '� �- UTILITY NOTES � � 3 � � iy SURVEYOR DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL U11LITtES ARE \ � ,F �°` _ SHOYYN OR THEIR LOCATiONS ARE ACWRATE. IT IS THE \ ti y RESPON5181UTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND DEVELOPER TO $ � CONTACT U.S.A. AND ANY OTHER INVOLVED AGENCIES TO LOCATE � �� ALL UT1UTiES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REMOVAL, RELOCATION � \ �g� �_ AND/ OR REPLACEMENT IS 1}iE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE � � `. � � _ CONif2ACTOR. ` \ �� _ � LEGEND � � - ` - - PROPERTY UNE 193868 � � � \ �`` � WAlER VAIVE WEST C U P ER TI N 0 GRAPHIC SCALE � AGL ABOVE GROUND LEVEL 224 �CUPERTINO, CA 95014F DR. � s 'o � p � _ __ AMSL ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEL ` DRAWN: DATE:03 25 11 _ JOB N0. 10-058 � °f �' � \ \ SHEET N0. i �cn - �o ec � � C 1 . SHEET 2 OF 2 BWNDARY SHOWN IS BASED ON RECORO INFORMATION ANO FOUND MONUMENTATION. THIS IS NOT A 80UNDARY SURVEY. PROPERTY UNES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. ````` ' - -_ (E) CMU WAL� \ ,�-- ._��� � a 0 � Z O � Z Q U � Z W � W � � ----------___-----____ � �•_� �' �� �� �:. .,\ \ (F. j TUR"J Ait`JuiJu , \ '•\ � ��� / \ `�\ � � \ � ` _�------------�"•----__�� � \ � `�� ,y V `, � � � � '� F , � \ � �� � v� \, \ \, �� O � �\ � J U � � � Z �� � '� t \ i � q � \ � ��� I � /� U � + i \ � 1 \ � �m � NOTE: REPAIR AND REPLACE PLANTING AND IRR►GATION , IN VERIZON PROPOSED LEASE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AREAS. \ /.' ti � j , / / �,' / , �� � �' / / \ � JOINT UTIUTY OP POLE � (E) PG&E VAUL POWER P.O.C. . \ \ /,, .,\ \ .� / /" � � `� ���-------'_ ,, DISRUPTED GROUND COVER � TO BE REPLACED TO MATCH EXISTING. � �\ � �\ �'� .\ � \ � \ � \ '� � � �`, � � � �\ � , 1 � / i 1 /� ti (N) �'ER�ZON i�rSRE�ESS DISRUPTED GROUND COVER ; 0' MCN(:PINE T4 REPIACE TO BE REPLACED TO MATCH (E) TJYVER Sft ANT�NN.4 PL!',iJ EXISTING. `` �SETP,IL 2/P.-2 ����__` � (N) VERIZON WIRELESS � -�,1�; --� LEASE AREA 727 SQ FT � �� ;�-��\ OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT I ~�� - � SEE DETAIL 1/A-2 �� , i � i �� �, ; \ l t, i � � � i / / / ����� � �� �`�\�� � 1 �� �,� ' `/ `����� , / // ����` i �` � \ \ �� � ,� `,' � / /,� � ����' , `' + \\�\ ,�\ \� i1 I /��/��� / � ' -� � . �_ � : �� A � � '-�-; , � �=--�'��� ' ` � � WINGWALL' � .�.�' - -i--- � � t.:.�_ �'_� �:: � TO MATCH i � ..� 1 �� 1 ,.. ( � �a�rarr���z�rr�u���:�a��- �'�� 2'-6"HIGHx19'-10"x1/2"THK REPLACED �Y ' PAINTED TO MATCH CMU WALL (Nl i�!ONQPINE--� ,�� �t�C�OUSTICAI REQUIREMENT) � / 4� � �-, � . � �> > ,�� � i `\ �� v � `�\ (E) TREE TO '�� � BE REMOVED '-� � .,�� �_CMU� WALL/ �, ------------- --_ .__.,� , � �'c�cW� ----� i i � ' � � �- �� �' ���'� (F } T04VER T^v 9F_ REVISIONS �i%;� ��� ; y �,`` ,` �� � -S �� � � �m ,,, / J / � �� � �3 _a � � �` � ✓ ' �l"� rs / i / � i � � I �g �a � c� � � i � � � J�O / iY � ��� � \ J / � �� , �� '� / ��� �% �-��` �-��� ; l j i"� � ' � ' � / /' I � �- , , , ( , � ,:�- , .�' � ;��� � 1 � � , � \, ' � ' I , (N) 2' WIDE \ TELCO UTILITY EASEMENT — '� ,9iL �, � (E) PACBELL VAULT � TELCO P.O.C. '�'c� ��� .,\ �F '�� \ `� C'� `\ \�\ '� / �.n � � �� '�� , p� G \, \ ��. � (N) 2' WIDE POWER UTILITY EASEMENT — (N) 5' WIDE WALKING PATH � � , � '�' I .� , , 1 , � � � � ' � � � , � � � , , � � � � � � � �� , 1 y �Q' �— , � 3� � � — (E) WOODEN RETAINING WALL (N) POWER AND TELCO IN JOINT TRENCH SEE DETAIL 1/A-6 TREE TO (E) BUILDING L. D STR� DESIGN / C� � �- a � o `c c �N� OYM 22 SHARY GRCLE, SUITE 9, CONCORD, CA. 94518 PHONE: 925-686-3241 FAX: 925-686-3350 ��� � No. C0411I5 Exp. 3/31/13 -�� * . �. �\ .� ` �\ .� � � �� � 3 - (N) 8'-0" HIGH REDWOOD FENC ` • TO MATCH (E) PUD FENCE DESIGN �2� � �`�2 .� � �\ .� \ � . � � (E) DRIVEWAY �, � �� \ \ ��, � \ � � .\ `�� \ � ``� � . `�� � .\ � � .\ � �� _� N .� i27 2 E , � � � ; �8� MA6NETIC DECIINATION '� 14.5' SITE PLAN � o�' 4' a' �z' SCALE: 1/4"=1�-0" -�• SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" 80�ZD 90�ZD 95%ZD 9592D Rev A 100%ZD 1009eLD Rev A 100%ZD Rev B 100%ZD Rev C 1009'ZD Rev D 100qZD Rev E � � � � �� a�� � o � � .. ZO`V � Y � �U� � = W C ��Z� ; � V ���,�� N�5 � a � a'�o � � N U � � N T � z � o I1� �V ��c. E ��� � C� � z � Q� ._ w pw,,, O � �z a U w � � � � w � O o�a O � _ � � � � DRAWN: MRB I DATE:6/: FILE: 4299-A1.1 SHEET N0. A-1.1 MADE IN U.S.A. (N) 70� TALL MONOPINE � ti ti� Q (N) VERIZON WIRE�ESS 4' PANEL ANTENNAS (6 EA 2 PER SECTOR) ANTENNA PLAN z SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" A-2 2' �• O N H� A2, >>o T � � N � 270 W 2 E 90 � 180 MAGNETIC DECLINATION � 14.5' 0 1' 4' S' 12' SCALE: 1 /4"=1' 0 1 � (N) AR20044RS GEN PLUG io � � (N) VERIZON "j WiRELESS 18" �n WIDEWAVEGUIDE - BRIDGE SEE DETAIL 4/A-6 (E) CMU WALL & UTILITY BOXES TO BE REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION SEE A-1.1 (MATCH EXISTING WALL) (N) VERIZON WIRELESS GPS ANTENNA (TYP OF 2) SEE DETAI� 2/A-6 . � � FUTURE N CABINET (N) VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICE LIGHT (DOWNWARD FACING W/ TIMER) TYP OF 3 (N) VERIZON WIRELESS RF WARNING SIGN ON GATE SEE DETAIL 3/A-7 (N) VERIZON WiRELESS 4'-0" WIDE SINGLE SWING GATE SEE DETAIL 2/A-7 � 23'-2" r --------- � ' i - - - ---- ---, ' �� // i � \��\ ' � ; � i \ � i � // p I �\ � � � I r I \ ' I� � � i � \ I I —_ �/ � � _ �`� �i —` i � ( � — , _ � 1 , _ � �� 1 1 i I � i � i _ y . I � , � � � � . m V v m V v �� 8� z ��� mm �U �ms JUv � `� ��g� J L__J �`'t�\� . ��� 1 I (N) VERIZON WIRELESS 70' MONOPINE TO REPLACE (E) TOWER SEE ANTENNA PLAN 2/A-2 (N) MONOPINE BRANCHES MUST NOT EXCEED LEASE AREA (E) TREE TO BE REMOVED (N) VERIZON WIRELESS LEASE AREA 727 SQ FT � OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT (N) WOODEN PANEL EXTENSION 2�-6 /2 PAINTED TO MATCH CMU WALL (ACOUSTICAL REQUIREMENT) (N) WINGWALL TO MATCH (E) CMU WALL (N) VERIZON WIRELESS STEP-DOWN TRANSFORMER �i � (E) WOODEN RETAINING WALL (N) POWER & TELCO \ IN JOINT TRENCH SEE ,,� DETAIL 1/A-6 � I � ' (N) VERIZON WIRELESS OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT LAYOUT -- - SEE G-1 (N) CONC SLAB SEE SHEET S-1 (N) 8'-0" REDWOOD I FENCE TO MATCH (E) PUD FENCE DESIGN. SEE DETAII 1/A-7 2 A-3 �� ENLARGED SITE PLAN � SCALE: 1 /4"=1 � - 0" A-2 L. D STROBEL CO. INC. DESIGN / CONSTRUG'I'ION t a � : � o i �c� �+� �onM�N� 022 SHARY CIRCLE, SUITE 9, CONCORD, CA. 94518 PHONE: 925-686-3241 FAX: 925-686-3350 �� � No. CA41145 Exp. 3/31/13 * * �aF c� REVISIONS N0. DATE DESCRIPTtON 1 O6 10 10 80%ZD 2 06 18 10 90%ZD 3 07 07 10 95%ZD 4 08 25 10 95�ZD Rev A 5 08 30 10 100�ZD 6 10 O6 10 1009�ZD Rev A 7 10 26 10 100�ZD Rev B 8 01 11 11 100%ZD Rev C 9 03 31 11 100�ZD Rev D 10 O6 03 11 100�ZD Rev E � o °' _ �� ��� � � O p�O �p� ����U ��� o �C� � � � a � � � � Vf�NU� >N3 � z � O � � � � � � � � z�rn .� z a o � � � � �1. � [� � � � � w � O O � � a � ` 0 .�' � a � N � � E 90 � 70 W � 2 DRAWN: MRB DATE:6 03 11 FILE: 4299-A2 SHEET N0. �g0 MAGNETIC DECLINATION °- 14.5' ��� 0 1' 4� 8' 12' SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" MADE IN U.S.A. 70'-0" AGL TOP OF BRANCHES 70'-0" AGL �. (N) VERIZON WIRELESS TOP OF BRANCHES (N) VERIZON WIRELESS L D STR oB sz-RU Io 4' PANEL ANTENNA 4' PANEL ANTENNA (6 EA 2 PER SECTOR) (6 EA 2 PER SECTOR) �. 4 � : NEEDLE SOCKS TO BE APPLIED NEEDLE SOCKS TO BE APPLIED � �� � TO VERIZON 1MRElESS � TO VERIZON WIRELESS a► � 62'-0 AGL PANEL ANTENNAS PANEL ANTENNAS ° a � � N �� CENTERLINE VERIZON ANTENNAS � 62'-0" AGL o � w � CENTERLINE VERIZON ANTENNAS � (N) AT&T � 022 SHARY CIRCLE, SUITE 9 CONCORO, CA. 94518 4' PANEL ANTENNA (N) AT&T PHONE: 925-686-3241 F�AX: 925-686-3350 (9 EA 3 PER SEC70R) � 4' PANEL ANTENNA F. I ���� ' � � (9 EA 3 PER SECTOR� .s+cf�, �� �`Y Na C041145 ' E�. J/St/IS 1I � t 52'-0" AGL I I I � � �``''"'. CENTERLINE AT&T ANTENNA � 52'-0" AGL CENTERLINE AT&T ANTENNA � REVISIONS V � ` , N0. DATE DESCRIPTION � ��.�y�1 � � � 1 06 10 10 80%ZD 2 O6 18 10 90%ZD 3 07 07 10 95%ZD � �� 4 �8 25 10 95%ZD Rev A 5 08 30 10 100�ZD � 6 10 06 10 100�ZD Rev A � > � � � �1 � F � � , � 7 10 26 10 100%ZD Rev B 8 01 11 11 1�O�.ZD Rev C � 9 03 31 11 100%ZD Rev D � � � 10 06 03 11 100�ZD Rev E '�'' � ' r � � , o � � (N) VERIZON WIRELESS � � o0 GPS (TYP OF 2) v v�i � ��� �� � (N) VERIZON WIRELESS i�� � N �� (N) VERIZON WIRELESS OUT�OOR EQUIPMENT � Gi i t� �� w OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS �� � o � U 4' ', � 3 � = Q � �� � � CABINETS ( N) V E R I Z O N W I R E L E S S c � c � a� Z � �� 5 � SERVICE LIGHT (DOWNWARD � � � N � POWER ENTRY FACING W/ TlMER) �� N v� � N� (N) VERIZON WIRELESS � & TELCO POWER ENTRY � � TYP OF 3 GPS TYP OF 2 MOUNTED ON MOUNTED ON � � � H-FRAME � H-FRAME (N) WOODEN PANEL EXTENSION � (N) VERIZON WIRELESS � 2'-6"HIGHx19'-10"x1/2"THK SERVICE LIGHT (DOWNWARD PAINTED TO MATCH CMU WALL Q � FACING W/ TIMER) (N) WOODEN PANEL EXTENSION (ACOUSTICAL REQUIREMENT) �, TYP OF 3 � 2'-6"HIGHx19'-10"x1/2"THK � Q � � PAINTED TO MATCH CMU WALL (N) 8'-0" REDWOOD (N) FAUX BARK � �� (ACOUSTICAL REQUIREMENT) FENCE TO MATCH fE) � (N) 8'-0" REDWOOD �� PUD FENCE DESIGN. F ,__, 00 � SEE DETAIL 1/A-7 z�� �� FENCE TO MATCH (E) ; PUD FENCE DESIGN. � (N) WINGWALL � SEE DETAIL 1/A-7 TO MATCH (E) 7' � (N) WINGWALL z�, O I CMU WALL TO MATCH (E) 7� � CMU WALL � � Z � � i a � w � (N) VERIZON WIRELESS 18" WIDE � [--� � WAVEGUIDE BRIDGE � (f� � � I � Q � o I , (E) FENCE O � � (E) TURN AROUND � ' - i � � � LZ' � _ I a �� � � - -�-- - -�--- ' - � � , -- � _ � _, � , ; � .- � � �_.; o.,.. . ,.._ �_ . _ ._� , -- _ �. � � j .. . . . , �-. ..�.-, w .. . � ':. . . . . . .. _ t r � .. � , .. .,.._ . . _ �. , . . � , . . . , . '.. . . . . - . . . �: _ . ' _...; ,..: .: . � . . I I : . , �: I . . . . , . . f` � ... � .. � DISRUPTED GROUND COVER TO FUTURE OUTDOOR (N) VERIZON WIRELESS TElCO ENTRY DISRUPTED GROUND COVER TO DRAWN: MRB DATE:6 3 11 BE REPLACED TO MATCH EXISTING EQUIPMENT CABINET STEP-DOWN MOUNTED ON BE REPLACED TO MATCH EXISTING TRANSFORMER H-FRAME FILE: 4299-A3 SHEET N0. SOUTH (E) w000EN EAST ELEVATION � RETAINING WALL ELEVATION 2 A_3 0 1' 4� 8� 12� SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" -3 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" -3 SCALE: 1 /4"=1'-0" MADE IN U.S.A. SITE MAP VICINITY MAP � � � � � PROPOSEO 727.11f / / / � � e5 r�•�omnle.dRe � L SQ. FT. LEASE AREA (E) BuILDING � � ! � / �"�o� �����` �LATITUDE & LONGITUDE � � � + 7 ec=szs.r,wsz I / L - ��� F" �";a HT 6Q8' A[X ��, � TAKEN HERE � , / � / ��� 37'18'39.01"(NAD 27) / 7 SANTA CLARA r � � �' �� '� � ` � 122'04'05.54'(NAD 27) � � � �� c a � I ���� ` � � � 37'18'38.80"(NAD 83) � (E) BUILDING � � � � � � I'� � NT FL�' �Cx � 122'04'09.40"(NAD 83) � � _ LI 1 1 � �P- �. , Q I 1� �� z , , � _�,� �p ��� �,' . "� A.,�,. �,-_\ i� �� P�T ROOTBALL _ 9 CUPERTINO '�,,. � ' '� � �-: 356 � ��` / / �Tl S �� _ ._ . ., _ � �+..�•�`°`.e�.v es sra.<�c� ` � ��� ` ' =�` �Z � � � / \ STAKE w... ..,; � , . � .-. -� �n y � f5' PgV£ O ��� Y''�r�\ Q=!di f' AM.SL O 3 � �� ` � v .. c ' � � _ `\ /�/�`��r� HT-11.9 �[x ANTENNA TOWER� � � � ` � � C� :-., ' ° � :oxn� // (E) MONTEREY PINE TREE � ���� \�� �/� ���� ` REMOVE �s'�N£ E1-574.9' AMSL �� � 2" DIA. X 9 F00T LODGPOLE � � � �n.,� '� � _ _ �\,��� L, � �' •• / \ ( , £L-sA0.s'.ws[ HT=58.0' AGL �`� / PINE TREE STAKES (2) - Z Z F�' V --� �� ��`� �/ f''� '� � --' • -� MT J3T� AGC LOCATE OUTSIDE OF ROOTBALL .� � ' � •.� :� ., � �, .. - : - � ,�J� unurr aox o F _ ., :�..... f �� �\ ���� ���-' %�.-', • � � ) (REMOVE} �� �'``� '� AND PERPENDICULAR TO z w _ � � , / / a � ` \.\ � � '. ' � �'� . _�` � PREVAILING WIND �� � � - �' ' .� ` � � '\\ ! m � /� . ': : �; ,�� .,__ (SEE PLAN VIEW) � � a o � E / �� Yy ` _��,' i /� ,//: �i f �. \� ,`� 24 � � � I � � , r CENTERLIN UiIUTY �'�GNDU •�t-��-- �' �:'�'�> ��' pvsv Ec-sz�.a• aus�. t I ;� PROJECT OF PROPOSED �— _ - --- � � r�/ �� j i . / ��_'� Hr s3e',atx � LOCATION � � 2'WIDE ELECTRIC � � � � \ \�� r� s j'� � � ` �•'�� � � �1 ` ' \ , ` "`�� ROUTE \' \ � ' ��� /� � \ ` / APPROVED TREE TIES(2)- ' � un Ll'TY q:.�t '�/%j � a' � � 4, \ LOCATE AT POINT 1NHICH I GENERAL NOTES ^ -:� -- � TREE REMAINS UPRIGHT � � �l'iN..lt'( EO�C- � j!� �'� (p) NEW WALL �' �� r � _� -�.; ` � DURING WINDY CONDITIONS. I CENTERLINE OF \ � UTILIkY 9 ( - ! � BY OTHERS � \ `'\�\�,, \ , ,\, , � ` � (SEE NOTE 1) i ', PROPERTY INFORMATION PROPOSED 9 / MET'�R j' � � �\ �\� 1 I ' SET CROWN 1" MiN., 2" MAX. I, / / � \\�\ ���\�\\' � /, 24'qNi ABOVE FINISHED GRADE � WIDE ACCESS / ) CHIN SE PISTACHE / i, OYMNER: M. SAUL HOFFMAN. ET AL ROUTE WV ! i � EMOVE) , \ TAMPEO NAl1VE SOIL ADDRESS: 22475 RANCHO OEEP CLIFF DRIVE � AT PIT EDGE TEMPORARY 4" WATERING CUPERTINO. CA 95014 yy� � i WATE \\� �//�j BASIN BERM AT EDGE OF � P� �:� ��.../ � BACKFILL MIX. g�� 1NEST CUPER11N0 / i — \ 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DRIVE JOINT UTILITY � B� � � ~ J � \, � Q — I I I � BACKFILL MIX:. CUPERTINO. CA 95014 DROP POLE � � � � � w� I I I • 1/3 NITROFIED FIRBARK � � \ � = p ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 356-02-032 U T i I I T Y B O X � yq� � / � 4 � p - � I ��i 2/ 3 O N S I T E N A T I V E S O I L �� / 1 (E) NEW ZE ANO FLAX SHRU \ x� PACBELL BOX � � i � � OVE) �' � � � I �� ''' EXISTING GROUND ELEVATION: ELEV=461.2'tAMSL ELECTRIC WATER � � E SE PISTACH EE CENTERLINE OF �� �� � _� ', N SIGN � ��-� ECIAL NOTE BELO /�' �. - , I I I I I— � � vAULT � VAULT � PROPOSED 5' WIDE � I_ I i i — � � ` ' i � I � WALKING PATH � \ \ Z � � (E) BUILDING � I � \ EL=470.2' AMSL � � � � HT=13.2' AGL � - NOTES; � � ELECTRIC � N , 1. APPROVED TREE T1E5 TO � � \ PACBELL � VAULT `\ � STAKES. NO NARE / \� � DRIVEWAY 2 X DIAMETE VAULT / ECTIONS ALLOWED. � � � \ \ / OF ( OO�ALL z_ REMOVE ALL NURSERY STAKES � � � � N UNDISTURBED SOIL J MIN. FROM ROOTBALL SIDES OF � �` \ � �I PLANT PIT TQ BE VERTICAL. � ��\ \ \� \ � � � O � 3. TREE I P T P�ERCOLATION T TESTS SHALL � �' � � � / BE PERFORMED IN CLAY SOILS OR � `� \ � ' � �/ HARDPAN CONDI110NS. � \_� O , � ��_��. ��� ���'' . � , ' ' / i � : - . - � � TREE PLANTING � \ � � a � a � N i� M � 0 , � 0 1 0 0 N � � 8 � � � \ �\ / � � \ ,����� - . � ' � CENTERLINE OF \ � tIC vnU�T � � ` �� � PROPOSED 2' WIDE \ \ � \ Z � TELCO ROUTE / �\ ' \\ � \ � . ` Q � ♦ SPECIAL NOTE: � / IF EXISTING PISTACHE TREE CAN NOT BE SAVED DUE � \ / \ CONSTRUCTION, A REPLACEMENT 36 BOX SPECIMEN �` PISTACHE TREE SHALL BE PLANTED IN THE SAME \ � .�6' Rtv�AO GENERAL VICINITY AWAY FROM ELECTRICAL A D TER LINES � � �\ \ .\\ / � \ \ V � � \ 9 q� LECEND � yO � - - PROPERTY LINE . \ � �� �, � M WATER VALVE � C�/ AGL �480VE GROUND LEVEL � � \ /C�� AMSL ABOVE1GfE Jl�SEA LEVEL � \ � � \ \ , . GRAPHIC SCALE 10 0 8 10 30 10 (��') � �ncn - �o tt TREE REMOVAL PLAN � � � 5 MYRICA �AUFORNICA � � � \ `` 15 GAL CALIFORNIA WAX MYRTLE � \ (E) OLEANDER SHRUB � � (TO BE RE�AOVED) , ` � (N) VERIZON WIRELESS `\ \ 70' MONOPINE TO REPLACE � , � (E) TOWER SEE ANTENNA � (E) REDWOOD TREES (E) MONTEREY PINE TREE (TO BE REMOVED) � (N) WINGWALI �+ TO MATCH \ cMU wn�� 1 / � � � E) CHINESE PISTACHE TREE (TO BE REM VED) �, /3 T 3 e NOTE: REPAIR AND REPLACE IRRIGATION � IN VERIZON PROPOSED LEASE AREA \ � (E) NEW ZEALAND FLAX SHRUB \ (TO BE REMOVED) \ (E) CHINESE PISTACHE TREE (SEE SPECIAL NOTE BELOW) SPECIAL NOTE: IF EXISTING PISTACHE TREE CAN NOT BE SAVED DUE CONSTRUCiION, A REPLACE�tENT 36' BOX SPECIMEN PISTACHE TREE SHALL BE PLANTED IN THE SAME GENERAL VICINITY AWAY FROI�A ELECTRICA� AND WATER LINES PLANTING PLAN � N � O� � �r + o� ,� � � �P � �a � �& ik a � �P 0 Ky ; o : �_ � �� � m : a �� V,NDSC�p f y���� a , �x �oeu, swaa \ � a� � i- � ���i a}�� �h �� Qe CN. w w J J J O > z � � w w w W � � o w w w � Z v�i�`n.aa W 2 O � j W W W Q � � � � � � � � � W � � o O O � !� o o \ r� co Q M.- N � O o����, ����� 00000 � � !^�'�� 1"�� � O �� H � � �� F� � W � � 193868 WEST CUPERTINO 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 DRAWN: DATE:06/06/11 JOB N0. 10-058 SHEET N0. L-1 U� BWNDARY SHOWN IS BASED ON RECORD INFORMATION AND FOUND MONUMENTATION. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPEPTINO, CA 9501�-3255 (�08) 777-3308 • FAX (408) 777-3333 • ��lannin�@cupertino.or� �uPE� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. Agenda Date: October 25, 2011 Application No.: U-2011-02, ASA-2011-18, TR-2011-65, V-2011-02 Applicant: Valerie Tallerico, Trillium (for AT&T) Location: near 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Dr (Rancho Deep Cliff HOA) Application Summary: Use Permit to allow a personal wireless service facility consisting of twelve panel antennas mounted on a collocatable 70 foot tall monopine and an associated equipment enclosure in the conunon area of a P1aiuled Residential Developnient. Architectural & Site Approval for a ne�r personal �rireless service facility consisting of twrelve panel antennas niounted on a collocatable 70 foot tall monopine and an associated equipment enclosure in t11e conuilon area of a Plaiuled Residential Development. Tree Removal Permit to a11o�T the removal and replacements of one, 26" diameter Monterey Pine tree to facilitate t11e construction of a personal wireless service facility Variance to allow equipinent cabinets to be setback less than 3 feet from a side yard property line. RECOMMENDATION: If the related Verizon Wireless personal wireless service facility at tlle same location (file nos. U- 2011-07, ASA-2011-09, EXC-2011-10, TR-2011-30 and V-2011-01) is approved, then: • Approve U-2011-02, ASA-2011-18, TR-2011-65, V-2011-02 per the draft resolutions (Attacllment 1). PROJECT DATA: Project Feature Proposal Ordinance Re uirement Hei�ht of Panel Anteiulas 54 feet 55 feet maximum E ui ment cabinet setback to side ro ertv line 8 inches 3 feet minimuin BACKGROUND: The applicant, representing AT&T, proposes to construct a personal wireless service facility, consisting of 12 panel antennas mounted at a 11eig11t of 54-feet on a proposed 70-foot tall monopule proposed by Verizon Wireless, and an associated base equipment enclosure. The 124 U-2011-02, ASA-2011-18, ATXzT Wireless Facility October 25, 2011 TR-2011-65, V-2011-02 Verizon monopine is designed for anteiula collocation and the Verizon applications will be reviewed by the Plaiuling Conunission as a separate item. T11e proposed AT&T personal wireless service facility is located to the rear of 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive bellind the residence. The abutting land uses to this project are single-fanlily residences to the east, south and west, and apartnlent buildings to the north. The project is sited on conunon-interest area property owned by the Deep Cliff Homeowners Association (HOA) zoned P(R1C) (Plaiuled Single-Family Residential Cluster). The HOA state that the current lack of wireless phone coverage presents a genuule public safety concern for residents in Rancho Deep Cliff and the surrounding neighborhood. Existing & proposed wireless coverage is depicted on Attaclunent 2. k � � �',� �:�a- :� �,� �f'd,�� ; €.�- � !!, � •a;�,�� _ � � 4 �� �` ' € � * 4 � � � �h � g � , �df "r�*'�! �s.# �� p �, 3 �� g � ",� � l� _ I' � � �� �� �ai.� � � ���:,� �����i. r� ...� � :!"y'�'��d ��"4"s5 h1�� #, p •r1 . �: � ��#.�*�` . ,, +- � g•, .� �� �.:p „� 7 ,�,.,�c � ` `� �� gv � t ' ,�+ ��. ��'��q . t � ��,��'-,���'�`f {.:. � r .. ,�,� �.� .� �..s � �� � � � h' �� i � 11� '. p w �`�' '�o`. . � � i'�� '�.;,�':'�'��•, f `'� '"" � � �� � p'� t ;�, . �r �+" �.r �„ r 1�' �`� �'— .., �,r:. , � -� , .J�� `�""�`��,`v" � - '�` � � � � � + -�--� � . 'f� � � a 5 ir ° ., �'� st ° k. �t� r� °, s a�°� � �� � � � , . �;cw ,� - � ,,,- ,� � r�r '� : Y� f . ''`" - � � � ��'f �" " � •� � •F ' `- � ° k �� ` ���('�� � � �` . C.a � , F ����. � � � � r �� � �: ; _ ° �i � , �T p.,�,.° ;?`" f�-- �� . � � � ��-.�9 * �� � � 4 �`� � � � �� j ,, S ,, a � �� 09 � � �. �" s 'l ;r � � a 4 �{ � .� 9f �-'aT �' � � gp. g ` `e sk : � . � � "� � . �" # ',� �� + � °^u ;� � � � ��' ' � ° � s '� . ,�r $' �,` �} � �i � ,t� V �i,f' � � � 4 :`,� �� e���. � � . �. �9oi3.: - � f f" � ��b.J � � .. � '.�� e�. �^ ��,� '. �K' � . � ��.� � � � �. �' � � - � >" ' � � ���'�"�� g � � ��-�. � � �� � � �- ��}� �: �;�} � �� ly�� F °p k "°'r��. � � y � ' - +P +�.i�� � 1 A �� � � P f + ,, l� °� t ��� , P Y � • � � l�" . �'�.. � � pa, f � r � � �� "'t. 1� � .:� .. w. .��� ° �'"� t �� d� !r �`,td; �j �'� �� � � ��a',�.t � � & �� � ' 4. F p � � y�y t � ��• "� �.a t � � � 6 '�, . � � y `� � r k ,.:� yF'. � q t '�?, �� � • k r� �"r��s'�'�? � �y ��� y� �'`� N � `� � � '�� � x � .. � F }� . � � � � .'���y� �.:, � � _�. r,w � � '� l �� i t ., � ��,�, �. a �� � ti� f� r. I �� ¢ ��'� sY � � ���� �:�' �� &.. � ."°.� 'i° -�"A �' '�, e � t �. � �. � `zY �� � ��L:� � ��' �� ' / � ,� a :�. �. JI � . p �y � , �. . _. � �, ,�'� �., .' �t ,� � , ,� s � ��� '� F i �' .. '� Y , � - ,� �b+ � '� � 4 j �r A ..,�„� a r ' � � sam�+�°?'' �Q f r � � ,�� � � � �'�� h i{� p ' �. � ' �.�� � r.;� ,g��� �y �' s �°°°'.� ��r� 4 �, �/3 ,� r ' '�1�� ��'�" � ` � � � •t * �` � � z � � � `'� } a � �, ' � � a :� �,'� +, �p :� � +� �"� ° � �,�,'� � � � � _I . � �` �y =��`s ♦� � } M �'��1�� A 1. �h.r w, ., Z � � I � � � _ �� '4ri . ���� < r . � . � �. , � �� ��� L ,� '(� �: °' � °� � Yr s� �� ���.��.��E �o •�_ � r y � '���� � z � ` "` t� : �� �� .� t� �' �* g"�'�il �� � �— " '4lfl�. v . r�-��'�"z � ��' '�'_ ��: �?�' � #�� �+'�"� � # , -, 0 � � "a"� � .� �°� ' . { a �.. �. if 8 � 'f'F� y,� � i � � .. ' � � �� � �� , �a'i 7 jf �" L ✓ "1: � 2 9 .` � � ' " � � f ti 5k� . 999}}} ,�� � � � .. � h � •°�P'� rt4 .� a��� e � �:� _�.` � � Y .� � �` V r �—' , ' ' . � d .4 � •� � �.__ r �1����� ., `� `°�` .�.�;m�' a� ��� � ; �1`� � °�...�, � �� s t ' � � : f�:' � a � ei � _ . �' ! �.� 9 �.R�- � � � 7 _ '.� , '�" J , � . ... � .'� � F �,.1 ^� rS 4 � a' � , I . !+� � � � �� i �'. � .w�, �''��'����, � ,�,� . �IP��,'�� - � S 0 � � �. � � � � Y�siF �` �� 7 i° � - �: � 9 •'' . .. - ., � � �� � , ��klCx ��� � � . .c eY e .. .JJI'4.i 1�4315..".$ . '�'m^'4"� .i� .•el ` • .. _ . - Proposed Personal Wireless Service Facility (Monopine) 125 U-2011-02, ASA-2011-18, ATXzT Wireless Facility October 25, 2011 TR-2011-65, V-2011-02 DISCUSSION: Visibilit�� rrrid Scree��i�ig of Wireless Facilit�� The project will collocate 12 panel antennas on a proposed Verizon monopule at a 1leight of 54 feet. The inonopine is sited witlun a grove of other tall pule trees. See photosimulations (Attachinent 3). The anteiulas and the nlounting hardware will be painted to nlatch the nlonopine and needle socks will be placed over t11e panel antennas. T11e branches will be extended sufficientiv to obscure t11e antennas. These design requirements liave been added to tlle Arcllitectural and Site Approval to minimize any potential visual intrusiveness of the structure. At-grade views of the equipment enclosure will be screened by redwood fencing on all sides. Disturbed ground cover areas will be replanted. Noise The personal wireless service facility operates 24 hours per day. The cabinet equipment is expected to meet City exterior noise standards (i.e. 55 dBA at nighttime: 8:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) with the nlitigation proposed by the noise consultant (Attachinent 4). The noise consultant's reconunendation is a solid wood fence around the entire enclosure. The project contribution to the interior noise level of the adjacent residence, 32 dBA, is below the City requirement of 45 dBA. Rr�c�io Freqi�eEicy (RF) Et�ergy Ari�zlysis A RF report was prepared by Hammett & Edison, Inc. T11e report estimated the cuinulative RF energy exposures at ground level and tlle second floor of tlle nearest residence are well witllin the Federal safety standards for RF exposure. In this case, the safetv standards for advanced wireless service and personal communication services are 1.00 mW/cm'-, cellular is 0.58 mW/cm'-, and 700 MHz wireless service is 0.47 mW/cm'-. Ground level cumulative RF exposure (Verizon & AT&T) was calculated to be 2.5% of the applicable public exposure limit. The second floor calculated, cuinulative exposure for the nearest residences is expected to be 3.9% of the applicable public exposure limit (Attachment 5). Tree Renrov«l The applicant is proposing to remove one tree: a 65-inch, not 25-inch, diameter Monterey Pine that is in t11e footprint of the equipment enclosure. The Monterey Pu1e is infested with Japanese Pine Beetle. A 36-inch box tree will be required as a replaceinent for tlie removed tree and a planting report will be required of the applicant prior to final sign-off of the project. Alter�intives Anrzlysis The applicant evaluated seven other potential cell sites in the vicinity of the project site. The sites are depicted on an aerial map (Attachment 6). The candidate sites are described below followed by the applicant's analysis: Site # Alternative Site Alternative Anal sis 1 Repeaters & Utility Pole Microcells Not feasible due to the tall trees, Various locations varvlll terrain, and lacl< of 126 U-2011-02, ASA-2011-18, ATXzT Wireless Facility October 25, 2011 TR-2011-65, V-2011-02 suitable locations. 2 Monta Vista High School, Area around school will have 21840 McClellan Road coverage once t11e Results Way facilitv is completed. 3 Deep Cliff Golf Course, Marginal RF coverage, Much 10700 Clubhouse Lane taller inonopole needed because of hei ht of surroundin trees. 4 Rancho Deep Cliff HOA swuiuning pool area Marginal RF coverage; site in a vallev 5 Stevens Creek County Park, Not feasible due to poor RF 13300 Stevens Canyon Road coverage. Hill between residences & park blocks radio si nals. 6 Hills westerly of Rancho Deep Cliff zoned Inadequate RF coverage because RHS. of tall trees & varyulg terrain. Hill sliadows Stevens Cairyon Road & Rancho Deep Cliff. 7 Stevens Creek Plaza Shopping Center, Not feasible, inadequate RF 10625-10637 S. Foothill Boulevard coverage. Site outside of search rin . In sununary, the extensive tree cover and 11illv terraul of the area limit the RF coverage of the various alternative sites. Rancho Deep Cliff is witlun AT&T's searcll rulg and an antenna collocation on t11e Verizon monopine was deemed an optiinal solution, rather tllan constructing a completely separate facility. Setb�zck Vr�riatice The property zoning requires that accessory structures meet t11e setbacl< standards of t11e adjacent residential properties, which in t11is case is three feet froin a property line for accessory structures seven feet or less in height. The applicant is requestulg a variance approval to allow equipment cabinets to be setback eigllt inches from the property line. To grant tlie variance the P1aiuling Conunission must nlake five findings as followed. Staff conunents are in itRlics: 1) There are special circumstances applicable to the property that do not apply generally to property in the same district. Accor��itig to tlre nppliaztit(s), tliis is t1�e orily ��rir�lyze�� cell site tlir�t meets the fi�t�ctioti��l RF coverrzge rec�i�irenretits for botl� zvireless earriers: Verizot� Wireless r�tid AT£�T. Tlie site l�c�s goocl li�ie-of-siglit c�ozuri Stez�e�is Cr�1i�o�i Rond/Footliill Boi�lez�arcl �ztid nll pj�o�erties clozufislo�e to Steve�is Creek zvitl�oi�t tl�e obst����etiori of t��ees r�t�cl llilly terrnifi tlint iirr�cle tlie sez�e�i alterr�atiz�e sites tiofiz�i«ble for tl�e n�plicnf�t. Ifi adclitiofi tlie locatio�i is well-screeiiecl by sliorter trees, zvitl� rensoti�zble nccess to tieecled «tilities rr��d l�rrs n willi�ig property lessor. 2) T11e special circuinstances applicable to t11e property deprive tlie property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the viculity and under identical zoning classification. 127 U-2011-02, ASA-2011-18, ATXzT Wireless Facility October 25, 2011 TR-2011-65, V-2011-02 Tlie co�iriiro�i-ifiterest nj�er�s of R1C-zofied clevelo��rletits are conri�lof�ly clevelo�ed ns l�z�iclsenpecl �eclestrirrri zvaU<wnys or recrer�tio}�al frrcilities. Tlie �roject site is a t�r�rrozv �ortio�� of tlie co��li�io��- i�iterest nren siti�Rtecl betzveeri tlie rer�r of rr si�igle-frziiiil� Yesic�e�iee r��ic� tlie renr of npnrtnre�it bi�ilcli�igs. Tlie nrerz is tiot cotid«cive to tl�e clevelopnler�t of l��ti��scrzped �e��estrinti z��alkzvr��s or recrer�tioti�zl fizcilities. 3) The issuance of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zoning in �rhich sucll property is situated. Tlie of�ly other z�iciriit�� properties tliat �zre �eYi�iittecl by zo�iitig to liost n perso�inl wireless serz�ice fr�cilit� are: RHS-zot�ed �roperties, cor�i���ori-i�iterest r�reas of resideritial ��evelo�nre}�ts, �rrrks, Dee� Cliff Golf Co«rse, Stez�etis Creek PlrrzR Sl�oppi�ig Cefiter rr�ic� Mofitn Vistrr Higli Scl�ool. All of tliese otlier niterrintive sites zvere deenled itifensible by the rr��licntit. Tliits, tlie grntitit�g of t1Tis z�nrin�ice �loes �iot co�istiti�te rr grn�it of speci�zl priz�ileges. 4) The variance is not being issued for the purpose of allowing a use that is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the parcel of the property. T1ie Wireless Colrinr«riicr�tiofis Fncilities Oyc�ifinr�ce et�ressl� c�llozus tl�e co�istri�ctio�i of persofinl z��ireless serviee fncilities i�i comriror�ly-ozut�ed nrens of residetitial clevelopnle�its z��itli n itse perniit rez�ie�v. 5) The granting of the application will not be detriinental or injurious to property or improvenients in the viculity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare, or convenience, and to secure the purpose of t11e title. T1ie fi�eilit�� 1ic�s beeai c�esig�ied to bleri�� if� zvitl� tJre resic�eriti��l e�iz�irofi�rlerit n�ic� zvill nlitigc�te fioise ini���cts. RF etiergy etiposi�res ��re estinir�ted to be zvell-z��itlii�i fe��er�zl snfety stn�i����rds. Tlie nvc�ilr�bility of zvireless co�ii�u�rf�ia�tioris coz�erc�ge to tJris �zren zvill i�rl�rove pi�blic coaiveriie�ice r��ic� snfety. P�iblic Noticit�g r�t�c� TICC/Pi�blic Co�irr�refits Public hearing notices were mailed to a 1,000-foot property owner radius around Rancho Deep Cliff. As of October 20, 2011, staff has received no public coininents other than as described below. The project was reviewed by the Technology, Information and Conununications Cominissioners (TICC - see Attaclunent 7). The TIC Coinmissioners were supportive of the project, noting t11at t11e 2009 TICC survey uldicated that tllis area was particularly poor for wireless coverage; the monopine would replace an existing visible lattice tower and the project had the proactive support of tlie HOA. TICC stated that cabinet equipment noise needed to be studied and abated (Please see Noise discussion above). The Rancho Deep Cliff HOA also submitted a letter (Attacllment 8). Two of the three conditions requested in the letter apply to the AT&T facility (Staff conuilents in it�zlics): 1) T11e applicant s11a11 conduct post-construction noise monitoring at tlle project site and five nearby residences (22395, 22415, 22435, 22455 and 22456 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive) to ensure that equipment complies with all City noise standards. Applicant will bear the cost of initigating any excessive noise generated by the equipnient 128 U-2011-02, ASA-2011-18, ATXzT Wireless Facility October 25, 2011 TR-2011-65, V-2011-02 (Re��«est 1ic�s beefi ifieor�orntec� i�i tlie Use Perlrlit �z�provc�l resoli�tio�i. Testirig slio�il�� be c�el�zyec� i�ritil r�fter botli zvireless fncilities ��re o�eratioti�zl so tlie cirnl«l��tiz�e fioise cnti be st«�ied). 2) The applicant s11a11 conduct post-construction RF energy monitoring at the project site and five nearby residences (22395, 22415, 22435, 22455 and 22456 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive) to ensure that the facility does not exceed the estimated RF exposure levels reported in the Hammett and Edison, Inc. report of June 17, 2011. If the estimated exposure levels are exceeded, the applicant will modify the equipnient to meet those reported estimated exposures (Reqi�est luzs beeri i�icorporrrtec� iti tlie Use Perarlit rzpprovizl resol�rtio�i. Testiyig slioi�lc� be c�el��yec� �ryitil nftej� botl� zvif�eless fizcilities nre o�er�ztio�inl so the ci�i�n�lntiz�e RF efieYg� etiposi�re cari be stucliecl. Plense tiote thnt tlie H«nif�iett £� Ediso�i, Irlc. re�ort esti�m�tes RF erlergy eti�os�cres thc�t �re f�r belozv Federnl snfety li�irits. Tlie Cit� azfifiot etifoYCe n RF e��osure lez�el tl�nt is fi�ore stritigetit thari federnl stnticl�rds «s rec�itestecl by tl�e ��roperty ozv�ier). Prepared by: Colin Jung, AICP, Senior P1aiuler Reviewed by: Approved by: / s/ Garv Chao / s/ Aarti Shrivastava Garv Chao Aarti Shrivastava City Planner Conununity Development Director ATTACHMENTS: 1) Draft Resolutions- U-2011-02, ASA-2011-18, TR-2011-65, V-2011-02 2) Existing and Proposed AT&T Coverage Maps 3) Photosinlulations of the proposed collocated antennas on the proposed nlonopine 4) Noise Letter prepared by Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc. dated june 28 , 2011 5) RF Energy Analysis prepared by Hammett & Edison, Inc. dated June 17, 2011 6) Alternative Sites Map 7) TICC Conunents 8) Rancho Deep Cliff HOA letter dated October 5, 2011 9) Plan Set G:pl�uu�lg/PDREPORTS/PC U reports/2011ureports/ U-2011-02, ASA-2011-18, TR-2011-65, V-2011-02.doc 129 Aitachment 1 U-2011-02 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 ` � RESOLUTION NO. , � OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVNG A USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE COLLOCATION OF A PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY, CONSISTING OF TWELVE PANEL ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BUT UNBUILT 70-FOOT TALL MONOPINE WITH AN ASSOCIATED BASE EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE NEXT TO 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DRIVE SECTION I: FINDINGS I WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and ' WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural i� Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public I hearings on this matter; and � WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and , satisfied the followin re uirements: has g q , 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property I i or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, � general welfare, or convenience; �� 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino '' Comprehensive General Plan, the Wireless Facilities Master Plan, the Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance and the purpose of this title. 3) That the operation of the facility will comply with federal safety standards for radio frequency energy emissions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. U-2011-02 as set ' forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of October 25, 2011 and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. ' 130 Resolution No. U-2011-02 October 25, 2011 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ' --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: U-2011-02 Applicant: Valerie Tallerico, Trillium (for AT&T) Property Owner: Rancho Deep Cliff Homeowners Association Location: Common area next to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive � SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,' DEPT. �� 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on Exhibits titled: "AT&T/CN4008/RANCHO DEEP CLIFF/ 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DRIVE/CUPERTINO, CA 95014" prepared by Connell Design Group, LLC dated 10/04/11 and consisting of nine sheets labeled T1, F1, C-1, A1, A2, A2.1, A3, A4 and A5, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. � 2. USE PERMIT ALLOWANCE The applicant is authorize to apply for building permits to construct a personal wireless service facility that includes an antenna collocation on a previously approved but unbuilt 70- foot tall monopine and an associated equipment enclosure. i 3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS � The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees; dedication ' requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, ', dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section '� 66020 a, has be un. If ou fail to file a rotest within this 90-da eriod com 1 in with all ; �) g Y P YP PY� g , of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such ; exactions. � � � 5. ABANDONMENT ' If after installation, the aerial is not used for its permitted purpose for a continuous period , of 18 months, said aerial and associated facilities shall be removed. The applicant shall bear ' the entire cost of demolition. ' 6. EXPIRATION DATE This use permit shall expire ten (10) years after the effective date of the permit. The applicant i may apply for a renewal of the use permit at which time the Planning Commission may review the state of wireless communication technologies, camouflage techniques and � maintenance to determine if the visual impact of the aerial facility can be reduced. I 7. POST-CONSTRUCTION TESTING OF RADIO FREQUENCY (RF) LEVELS The applicant shall monitor and report on cumulative RF energy emissions and compare ' exposures to the Federal safety standards in mW/cm when both personal wireless service '' facilities are operational. If the operation of the second wireless facility is delayed by more ' than six months from the operation of the applicant's wireless facility, then the applicant shall 131 Resolution No. U-2011-02 October 25, 2011 __________________________________________________________________________________ � report on only his facility. Emissions testing shall include measurements at sites next to 22395, 22415, 22435, 22455 and 22456 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive and the second story of the adjacent apartment building. The results of these tests will be made available to the � Planning Department and Rancho Deep Cliff Homeowners' Association for review. The City ; reserves the right to perform code enforcement actions and/or revoke this use permit if the � results show RF exposure levels in excess of the applicable federal standards. i 8. POST-CONSTRUCTION TESTING OF NOISE LEVELS � The applicant shall monitor and report on cumulative noise levels and compare them to City i daytime and nighttime noise standards when both personal wireless service facilities are � operational. If the operation of the second wireless facility is delayed by more than six months from the operation o� the applicant's wireless facility, then the applicant shall report on only his facility. Noise testing shall include measurements at sites next to 22395, 22415, 22435, 22455 and 22456 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive and the property line abutting the adjacent � apartment building. The results of these tests will be made available to the Planning �� Department and Rancho Deep Cliff Homeowners' Association for review. The City reserves �I the right to perform code enforcement actions and require noise mitigations if the results show noise levels in excess of the applicable city standards. � PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of October 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: I AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: i ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i ATTEST: APPROVED: � I Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chair i Community Development Director Planning Commission , � I , � �I ! G/pinnning/pdreport/res/1011/1i-2011-02 res.doc ' 132 ASA-2011-18 �I CITY OF CUPERTINO j 10300 Torre Avenue i Cupertino, California 95014 � � � RESOLUTION NO. � I OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROV ING AN ' ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL PERMIT FOR A NEW PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE � FACILITY CONSISTING OF TWELVE PANEL ANTENNAS COLLOCATED ON A PREVIOUSLY ; APPROVED BUT UNBUILT 70-FOOT TALL MONOPINE AND AN ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT I I ENCLOSURE AT A PLANNED RESDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (RANCHO DEEP CLIFF) � ; SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION i Application No.: ASA-2011-18 I Applicant: Valerie Tallerico, Trillium (for AT&T) �', Property Owner: Rancho Deep Cliff Homeowners Association Location: Common area next to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive i SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL: ' I WHEREAS, the Planning Conunission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an ; Architectural and Site Approval as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and ! WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of ' the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Coinmission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the , application; and ', WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and 'I WHEREAS, the Planning Comtiussion finds as follows with regard to this application: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or I improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general ! welfare, or convenience; 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 19.134, Architectural and Site Review, of the Cupertino Municipal Code, the General Plan, the wireless facilities master plan, zoning ordinances, applicable planned development permit, conditional use permits, variances, subdivision maps or , other entitlements to use which regulate the subject property including, but not limited to, adherence � to the following specific criteria: ' a) Design harmony between the new collocated antennas and existing trees have been preserved , and the materials, textures and colors of the new monopine harmonize with adjacent I landscaping and preserve the future character of the neighborhood and purposes of the zone in which it is situated. The location, height and materials of wa11s, fencing, hedges and screen planting harmonize with adjacent development. Unsightly utility installations have been concealed. Ground cover or various types of pavernents have been used to prevent dust and erosion, and the unnecessary destruction of existing healthy trees have been avoided to the extent practical. ', b) This new development, abutting an existing residential development, has been designed to ' protect residents from noise, traffic, light and visually intrusive effects by use of buffering, j setbacks, landscaping, fences and other appropriate design measures. ; 133 _ . _ Resolution No. ASA-2011-18 October 25, 2011 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED I That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this i matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof, the application for an Architectural and Site Approval, Application no. ASA-2011-18 is hereby approved, � and; I That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based I and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. ASA-2011-18 as set forth in the Minutes of Plai�ling Cornlnission Meeting of October 25, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as , ' though fully set forth herein. � SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. Plaiuzing Division: 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on Exhibits titled: AT&T/CN4008/RANCHO DEEP CLIFF/ 22475 RANCHO � �, DEEP CLIFF DRIVE/CUPERTINO, CA 95014" prepared by Connell Design Group, LLC dated ' 10/04/11 and consisting of nine sheets labeled T1, F1, C-1, A1, A2, A2.1, A3, A4 and A5, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. ' 2. ACCURACY OF PROTECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, � any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and rnay require additional review. 3. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS j The conditions of approval contained in file nos. U-2011-02, V-2011-02 and TR-2011-65 shall be ' applicable to this approval. � 4. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL I Architectural and Site Approval is granted for the architectural design and site planning for a personal wireless service facility consisting of twelve panel antennas collocated on a previously approved, but unbuilt, 70-foot ta11 monopine and associated equipment enclosure. � The P1ai�uling Commission shall review amendrnents to the project considered major by the Director � of Community Development. 5. MONOPINE & ANTENNA APPEARANCE AND MAINTENANCE The applicant shall construct a personal wireless service facility that achieves a tree-like appearance and satisfactorily camouflages exposed equipment by implementing the design criteria below: , a) Use a sufficient number of artificial branches of sufficient lengths to obscure the appearance of the , panel antennae and any associated mounting framework. b) Panel antennae mounted away from the mast shall be painted green to match the foliage of the � monopine. The antennae mounting hardware and RRU's shall also be painted green to match the ; foliage of the monopine. j c) All panel antennae shall have needle covers to blend with the foliage of the monopine. '� d) Cabling shall be internalized within the mast of the personal wireless service facility. , The building permit shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Cornrnunity ' Development Director to ensure the above condition is met. The applicant shall perform regular i maintenance of the monopine to maintain its appearance and obscure the panel antennae from public I, . view. 134 Resolution No. ASA-2011-18 October 25, 2011 6. E UIPMENT ENCLOSURE I � The equipment enclosure shall be completely enclosed with a redwood fence. Vinyl slats proposed I for the chain link fence shall be deleted. I 7. TREE REPLACEMENT & RELANDSCAPING i The removed tree shall be replaced with a�6-inch box tree planted in the general vicinity of the project. Ground cover areas that are disturbed by construction activities shall also be restored by the ' applicant. Final tree location shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. Applicant shall provide a letter from a landscape architect, certifying that the newly planted tree and other replaced landscaping are in good health ' and the irrigation system is operating properly to maintain the vegetation. ' I 8. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS , The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication � requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section � 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and ; a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified '; that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and i other exactions, pursuant to Governrnent Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest , within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally � barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25+� day of October, 2011, at a regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ' ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: '' ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i , � ATTEST: APPROVED: ; i � i �, ' Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chair Community Development Director Planning Coi7unission ! • ; I � I � G:Planning/PDREPORT/RES/2011/ASA-2011-18.doc I i 135 TR-2011-65 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. ' ; OF THE PLANNING CqMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ' I APPROVING THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT ONE 65-INCH DIAMETER MONTEREY PINE � TO FACILITATE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY NEXT TO � 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DRIVE SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TR-2011-65 Applicant: Valerie Tallerico, Trillium (for AT&T) Property Owner: Rancho Deep Cliff Homeowners Association � Location: Common area next to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR TREE REMOVAL WHEREAS, the P1aiuling CoiYUnission of the City of Cupertino received an application for tree removal, as described in Section I of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance � of the City of Cupertino, and the Plaiuzing Coirunission has held at least one public hearing on this ! matter; and � WHEREAS, the Planning Colnmission finds the following with regard to this application: � That the tree or trees are irreversibly diseased, are in danger of falling, can cause potential damage to , existing or proposed essential structures, or interferes with private on-site utility services and cannot be i controlled or remedied through reasonable relocation or modification of the structure or utility services; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of the maps, facts, exhibits, testirnony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution begiivling on page 2 i thereof,: : � The application for a Tree Rernoval Permit, Application no. TR-2011-65, is hereby approved, and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based ' and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. TR-2011-65 as set forth in the Minutes of Plaruluig CoiYUnission Meeting of October 25, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as I though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. i 1. APPROVED REMOVALS I Approval is based on Exhibits titled: "AT&T/CN4008/RANCHO DEEP CLIFF/ 22475 RANCHO � DEEP CLIFF DRIVE/CUPERTINO, CA 95014" prepared by Connell Design Group, LLC dated ' 10/04/11 and consisting of nine sheets labeled T1, F1, G1, A1, A2, A2.1, A3, A4 and A5, except as : may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. ' � 136 : Resolution Na TR-20ll-65 October 25, 2011 2. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. U-2011-02, ASA-2011-18 and V-2011-02 shall be applicable to this approval. 3. REQUIRED TREE REPLACEMENTS The removed tree shall be replaced with a 36-inch box tree planted in the general vicinity of the project. Ground cover areas that are disturbed by construction activities shall also be restored by the ' applicant. Final tree location shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community ' � Development prior to issuance of building permits. Applicant sha11 provide a letter from a landscape � architect, certifying that the newly planted tree and other replaced landscaping are in good health and the irrigation system is operating properly to maintain the vegetation. 4. NOTICE OF FEES DEDICATIONS RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a staternent of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with al1 of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25� day of October 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning ' Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: � AYES: COMMISSIONERS: I NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: � ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: i j ATTEST: APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chair Cornmunity Development Director Planning Cornmission �, � i � I G:Plattnirtg/PDREPORT/RES/TR-2011-65.doc ' 137 i v-zo11-o2 � CITY OF CUPERTINO � 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 � RESOLUTION NO. � OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO 'I APPROVING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW EQUIPMENT CABINETS TO BE SETBACK LESS ', THAN THREE FEET FROM A SIDE YARD RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE NEXT TO 22475 i, RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DRIVE � SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION ' Application No.: V-2011-02 Applicant: Valerie Tallerico, Trillium (for AT&T) Property Owner: Rancho Deep Cliff Homeowners Association ;� Location: Common area next to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive 'I SECTION II: FINDINGS I I WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a I '�� Variance, as described on Section I. of this Resolution; and '' WHEREAS, the necessary notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance ' of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more Public Hearings on this rnatter; and ��� � WHEREAS, the Planning Comrnission finds that the applicant has met the burden of proof ' required to support this application, and has met the following findings in order to grant the 'i variance: 1) There are special circumstances applicable to the property that do not apply generally to �i property in the same district, in that according to the applicant(s), this is the only analyzed � cell site that meets the functional RF coverage requirements for both wireless carriers: � Verizon Wireless and AT&T. The site has good line-of-sight down Stevens Canyon i Road/Foothill Boulevard and all properties downslope to Stevens Creek without the ;� obstruction of trees and hilly terrain that made the seven alternative sites nonviable for the ' applicant. In addition the location is well-screened by shorter trees, with reasonable access to ', needed utilities and has a willing property lessor. in addition, the proposed cell site location on the project property will result in the least amount of visual impacts to the surrounding � neighborhood. ' 2) The special circumstances applicable to the property deprive the property of privileges !, enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning classification. The ' common open space areas of R1Gzoned developments are commonly developed as landscaped pedestrian walkways or recreational facilities. The project site is a narrow portion of the common-interest area situated between the rear of a single-family residence and the rear of an apartment building. The area is not conducive to the development of ', landscaped pedestrian walkways or recreational facilities. ', 138 Resolution No. V-2011-02 October 25, 2011 i ', 3) The issuance of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with I �, the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zoning in which such property is ��,, situated. The only other vicinity properties that are permitted by zoning to host a personal � wireless service facility are: RHS-zoned properties, common open space areas of residential developments, parks, Deep Cliff Golf Course, Stevens Creek Plaza Shopping Center and Monta Vista High School, All of these other alternative sites were deemed infeasible by the applicant. Thus, the granting of this variance does not constitute a grant of special privileges. 4) The variance is not being issued for the purpose of allowing a use that is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zone regulation governing the parcel of the property. The Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance expressly allows the construction of personal wireless service facilities in commonly-owned areas of residential developments with a use permit review. � 5) The granting of the application will not be detrimental or injurious to property or '� improvements in the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and '' ; general welfare, or convenience, and to secure the purpose of the title. The facility has been i designed to blend in with the residential environment and will mitigate noise and geologic , impacts. RF energy exposures are estimated to be well-within federal safety standards. The ', availability of wireless communications coverage to this area will improve public convenience and safet . l i, Y � NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: � That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted ' in this matter, the application for variance is hereby approved by the Planning Commission of � the City of Cupertino. That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application V-2011-02 as set forth j in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of October 25, 2011 and are incorporated i by reference though fully set forth herein. ( � SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ! DEPT. i � 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS ' Approval is based on Exhibits titled: "AT&T/CN4008/RANCHO DEEP CLIFF/ 22475 ', RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DRIVE/CUPERTINO, CA 95014" prepared by Connell Design 'I Group, LLC dated 10/04/11 and consisting of nine sheets labeled T1, F1, G1, A1, A2, A2.1, ' A3, A4 and A5, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. NOTICE OF FEES DEDICATIONS RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS ; I The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication ' requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code I Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount I of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, ' 139 ' Resolution No. V-2011-02 October 25, 2011 dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such � exactions. '' � PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of April 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: ` AYES: COMMISSIONERS: j NOES: COMMISSIONERS: s ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: : ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: � Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chair Community Development Director Planning Commission I I i ; i � II , g/planninS/pdreport/res/2011 / V-2011-02 140 � i � � �' � �' �� � � N '" f ' rt Q � � � �D rr _. � '� �D : '� Z A _�� O � rt —• � Vl —� - � �D �' A _ �:.. f ■� � .a � = �o c� �r � - � O n- �'ao�� .� n ,=� , � .�_ � �■ F �� � r � s t '1 ,�. ' �� ^ ti .�. �.. o. � , _ . � /� -�i�� <�' '� � �D rr �D = � � -_ �� W 0=��?�� � ~,� z n rt � � � � � � � � c N � � �c3.�rcn� � A � � rt 01 A 3 �' . O � O O��: I--� Nrr�O� � O �� � � � 0 � � ���-� o ��c�a� �D o���'��' � c�coc '� ��a� cD ��3'tA�vi � � �� �'*O � ? � � � � � � y (A 's —� � �1 0 �A fl. � C C �. — •t rt �' � � 0� � � 0 � � � � �,�_�Ea� � �' w � a _ � � W idI � � fw Y, O � � A � � C �' - - .--'-" -- ._ _, � O � � �' � � O � r � � � , �:� `•� '� . , f � � ` �' J+ � " �,_ � � � . �i "' +� �.irY. n .� � � ' � r� • �: . 'i � ,� � : � . . `+��r'` -' �. ,' � � �� � ` � � � i �� ` � �� � � � � � f ' , �� ��� � �. � �`-� �� � �°� � r � r' .} r, f )� � f. �1+�2 � � . ti , � ��r t -' �.-` I �` ` ` : �'�. , �` �� G � .>; ' ;�. ,,,� j. 5 r ,��, , :� r • • s �� , � r � � �` Iy, q ' -�' �' p'•Ir' � �" �� � ' � � � � � . � �' ` #% � -��r.. � „ �. r . ���Y� ��;I a� � t .c�i'� _i',+ ¢ t . s - .±�� � � � 3 '"' � 9 � � tl�� �:� 4 ' . ;� .. , .. ��� �� �, � . .;� � � . Y - i � ' � . � .:� x ���- - � J f � . . r '!°.` ` ; : o-. , � ' � Y,. :�' ��, � � � � � : �� � ,. � ° {� � �. �� t �' � - � `� : .r, _ : a � ���'- ..1� ' * � r ��`� r �� . - ' _ ! _ . � � . + � f y � � , �°`l�►� ��I � a � � . A ��� `, �� � ��i�± ��� �.� �� � _ _ x . : `' � � -j3�. a ' '._ - �' i�!� i - ♦ i, . . '" . _ `�`'f' / � �, k '�� ,, � y � t 1 it�' r �� ' �ti � � f� �} '�l�i��` � �-' L A� �1'- �.�4+ Q ` ��� 4 ��` �'r � . � . L �,.,, . .f - �,• t.� � 7� �' 6 � f�r � . ��, , ` S�i r , g � � c � �„, ,,� y ' d �'" �� -e�t-*�� • �� � � .�- " -- ' � +y � � �' � � .� . �� � � ��C`����""''` ��`�.��; � , � �.�; ���}�_ �`, � �.. � - ; :� � � �. 2 � r, � � � � �= • � , ��a.-��°, � � _, , , . _ , � ; , ,� � ; � �' � � ` � �i �� y ` �'� , ; � � .,. '` � LL . a � f * � .�l�"' ' � zs�i 4�" � Y e� # :•4� 1�.� A - '� , < � - - �, � , , � s '1+ �i-'yt �� ,"� r _ � - i � t � • �" . �ec�` � � � " r� � �..� � �. r� ��.. �tf., �� 'f� - . l � � �. y - � � z � � 4 �. �a} � .: I , it � f ;� r- . j I I �� - ' S - :�' �r. �� - . ��?� S i2 .. ��``` ' �,. p _ _, 3 �� 1 �, �y� 6• `�� �'i. � 1 4. " � . �'� � �, `� r� . � �r �" ro � � e a* � r: _ � � � �' ,�" t�� �_� ;� �"� � � r ; i � � °;�lr -. *� �. ' :` ,1 Y � � � � � � .� ��'� #� N � }�,_ � - * . _ , r: - , �' _ • rt � � � � � +�" � �'' � Z � :i � r , y ► '� • c � — — � . O � � , '.. � � 3 e ` °� � , O . �, � a . ' F r�} �' ���� � Q � � � � . . ` ^ w :�� - �R" r' . � p � Ol . s� �'� � � O � � � ` � . � �� r �T � N � UO IP�4R,^� '�! i �� , ,.�-.�.' � N Vt �R - «�j e � � a i� � m ro .1 r �l _ , � �" � _ � � c -ti'` �iIJ� C� _ . " � "' j t'' � . � !�'�.' e � . . � � � N � ���. -� ( � . � �, ;;� � �,- . ��; � � � �' � ��' . � � ��� '� , '���' ' :. , ., �, h { "���. . ' . 1 I�Yt� � . . � J " ii�. a � �.�- . . -. ... , � _. . 142 . . . . , '' l ,�,- , - . "'1;�.'t _ J . . . ..�t ..`"!'3.... l,._.. . �� Cov�ra�e - nnono�ine �ol� �5�ft) .. -_ - � _ a � . _' -�'�a Ny�P . s " - ! � � �' , . �. _.' S R � � '�� - - � i* • ,� �. � � � � p � / I f',�.�,. f���;{ 4 � � . � �f. �.�� .� 's�.r .. �� i vs.,.�l ��` +�' '.�'G. �i ` . � � � , ,� � , ��.�� �� � �. legend w..sy�, "�, , :,'�' :���� �- = t+, .. �� ; ��� +• » � _ F � '�,���. �� < � � ` -� � � . � w � " : �. • "�, . . �y " y�. - �.. ., y � � +; ''�:��.-R'�" '' 4 ' �* +���`� - ,�"'�+.�" �lq''' Site CN4008 � °� �': - r '" , • '�� �� • ���,�"� *�4��;,'�,�:,.`� �� ;- � � . _ �In-BuildingService ' �"n �� �% `~�"•` r � � ' , ' :''"a � a��• i� M In-TransitService ` . � ; 's. ` ,�.„hs- -+-w.t ;�'1 � . r �� •�, � +�,',,�� �' t:: " ; �r *; . t °R4 � � Outdoor Service ..`�, *� ,��" , ,. ' -- �: � ,�_.. .,�,�r. � + -�• , • - . �,r '` . ',? ,� a, :,�. A'- .'" L .�, � s�, , i� " , � Proposed site - "� �.� �1�:: .(, • � � .��' �`' '� � � ` . _ k ' I Y �' , � � .. � � A �j� , �i��•. �.��_�� !hr- , j � ,.: :, t �� Y � r •. - �M r � �� .. ` � � � I , � �:J��+► �C"'�-_� � -.-. 1" '�.� � �, � . �aa..� ri'� �(�' � 4 .�s� ��...�...��' '�' ��� � . r�!� . �`' ,�,� ' 1.1. 'f+i�"r � � , � y Y � • r �` • t.. - °^ .� �� ` . ' � ,yr � . .Wlt"i� ��':� �'1'..�� � . � ,,.1„`��.��. �ik1i7 ` .a" �+."�'i . � , " r j. "�#� � . �1� 4 ��,� i � ��� . �� _ .'y'�V '� � . ���� �'., _._- ..,�_l _ �y4 / ♦ � .. �. . �� � � �6� � . � P �:" c r y ...r � � .:,. � ,.. i. P ` .,•� � . .,., ' a , s � � �'' ��� �� �. � .:,,:__ �`.:� - � ;'� -"'�"� � � .��� ' '�, .. '� . �_� �� .} _ _ ' a S . _ .�:' � : ;�, � ,� � :aiif � �� �' n r 4� �Mer''�� r: � a � �" � t� �.. '.,` � �,` ' r " � , `� . :' '"'4 r... _. . ;, :.. � �' ���y" '`^ x, � i �,,�,� ��' ' �'� � � W � �i� ',�' i ... 3 ,Ih '�. _ ...� } , �"' �k� * 1 w ,.aLi. � .. � _ .�E ��., F(P I�� `�' �EiYY� .� � � � �``�'�� f� ,. �. ` `"�„ , . : . �w���� . . - � : � � . �� �� � l y ''��. , ,4 Ls�..._ :�� � r-,i i � �: .. � y�� �s "` t'ej J} � �,, , �, ,., .. s� �. �-3 ��:-�, � ��,. ` , �' , i i . _ , ~�' , , � � �� � . �a��,s . ... .. a ' 7`� ,*, � ... r �'�'� . .M., „ � r„�,�,Lnt-' ':141 ' ..'1'•.0 I!' ; : i� .,.. im � C � . �� �� � . . � � . . 4 � p„ • � t , �- � �. . � ,�..... . . � „ y "?�► ,r . , f�� �� ,. . �` '�°� '--��r_ � � � i � � � � ... ; �a.w__ _ ._,��_ _ `_-- -.- - _ , �, - ---___-- ` ; _ � I � - . � � � � _ _ _ _ . . � . . . . . � i ; � i _ , - ,� � . � , ._�. , � �, � „ � � . � — � , . � '; : _<' .�� � � � , .II . �".�-��` .yi� , � . � R - _ �{,� 7�� �� �.��",�L' � ���`^� -y 4"w '! `,���, ����. • •� . . «` ,''!;• • . ��..�'����p - � . -- � � �� �°� � � •;r � , +�y�_-: �-. . � �, �� +�+.- y �` a .` ;^` �� , � � . . . .: .� _ . . , � � � � . -. . .� � � :: y � � � ,� W - 3,�,i � ��` . � a, - �r .: 4�, � ,. � .� , � . .��!� � �.,. {., . . 1 ,� :. y ,� �:. 1i • ky !� a�'�... .� � } F �'�� �� .+�,' kllF� . �,;. � i~ � ° � � �:. ''.` .. . ��.::' �. y� , �� - � •: E � . 5r,4j,�+. i . ^'# . �, s �., # ..�,., # .� :e �� . � .,�,. 4 i'"� aMr'� • �j � ' ` - ' . �, '� + ,�. ;��' � � * '�` .... , � ' � w � �' � ! � , � * ��"�a -�• °X X�� ^ � . ' ' �4 - 4,. .t' � � � �•: 7.- , i { V. ;. ^ -�. - .- . � . . _ . � ; y � � � � � 1w.kC� w M, !r• � �� "�^°;1 . �} ,y.� � y � .,�. .,� � ,� . �', �`...� �"- y `... ,_ :- •.. . . ,� . �i ._ ,'! + .. - � r � �t � _ �� ' k � "f��s�'�MMj 1 ,� A � S . � , � _ � � . _ , . . � "G� _ _ . � . � .� y -��« , �.. . �� ,. . � . _ . f - . t � I . : �ry. ._ _ . _. . ,�'� + —. . _, � . � � •'�-« " � i � ' 'x�• .. � _ � ;,�: � T � -, ,� , �"� '�"'r y ,,, �� ''E1� �A ;,•: ' �It,,� . � , _ w � - "�►��' � � �"°+��� �• k� ,. . - . � ' � `. .:... �: .. � . ' ,:- . "' , ' ` y - � . q : �, ;�- . ' �': ... � � N �'c�w.�'r. �. . �. � ' ' � e � , � . ti - . _ � � - -;- � � _ � .. ae. . �� Z Y �" - � - ., � " i �. • . . . _ � y � � � � L � . i _::: . � � �� � � � � � K � s � ~ � ���� . . '� r�: �� '". . . � ` � r :'�` � { � ir * : '' � -. . � _ t , _' ... , . ., . � . � i � � , . . ,�'"�r + t ' - _ ,_ , _ . , i� +e w , M . ° � -- � , - , . � �'S � -'� _. � ' ` � � '', � , : � � : � �� ° . .. t��" � � � �� `�' ' _� , ' �, ' Yi' . . + * � � I � � y . _ - �." T i x Jp�� .� y "s . ' E 'A F * ��' +r �` * � . , ,� .. ., - � � , �. _ � , � - � � . ; ,... , � . ,� , • .. r. ` , i�,, � ��, ��/� . � - � - � ' , �,. . � '�[ '�'� . d H � {�' �!` � �� + „- .�. ` . _. .� •�' - y� . .. � ' �. . . � � R , � . {;,. . , ";♦ � ' � t � �- . , ���. . . - , . q . � . . '�� -. ' _ .. . - . » . . , ' - =4 . . �, .. . ... .. � . . � - '!t � ... , � '� ` � - i .' w -� - � . ' � � . ��:. �� � `� T � . . . :. -- � -' '� � . ` "� � �x. �#. � � y . . . ; � . • � � ! � . - � ". '� � w . r . . % � _ •. _ . . ` '�. . :� •: - . y� � ."� _ ` � ' ..�..�,.� i � ,}.� � Y � x. � r ..4. - # �� �� , 1 � ! " ' ��4. *�� ,� ,�. � Y�S e * -?�� .'� ,� ,�� ° ` �„i _.�. � .� •- . - r ? +r '�,' . � , , � � _,,,,- . � � , . . '! ,�,,; . . - � �' �,,s A r � - w • � �. , • . .. . :.� , .: , � �- A :• r .. r _ . �� , _ - * ; . , ' ..• ._, �: - - M, x?• � � „">' - . ' _ ,` �iy � , � � +'. . • - �� . . ��.,, � �r�,.,y ��� � T � � � . _ '�. �� 7!'[: � w �' � ~• `S �,� ''�t . � ' ' . • s �.e°.! 1 G. � + �',��,�.� � �,� �� � � - t�.�� .� . �� , �H' � � . - � � � m �le �� • � ' �..a.,�. � .. ` � y �.� , �� ."'' 4 r+ � , * . ,. . � . . .. , . . . . . . ' . :. � � ; �,. � ..� � �� - , . . - .a,-+ '� "�!" a�r t. . . ' �. ' . ' • _ ' � � � . , ._ i. - . s . " � III�� .M1 , • • ' /�' - ... _-� + ` �� � - �� �y � � _ r .* � _ � • _ '. � a • nl _ . . � y � .� - .. � ' eti ��` ���A •!�. 4 �� � ' _ , � ` s .. •:. _�'� ' ` . � +��+ �_. .. �F. - .. F "�.:. �„ 4 � , w ��� .- l �s y ' Y _ � � e � � �1, �'d� �t� � �1'� . ._ , ' � . . , . : � " � ` ' �� � .,. � i '. .� � . ., . . - w • � . , . . 4._. . � , r� 'a � . � '. .,' - . � ' '_ . , r � ,'_ . �. '� � i .,.� � . � �� � ; ^ � .�7 'i � � � " � '...� , t � • �• y '."���'r,� �� .�� 1{4� ;� � d' 7 y . � ' �,�� . . �� .�� . ' - . _ . �i �. v 4:_�. ��•~Y� .. . _ . � au � � . �� � . . . � , � , � . �, � � ' . . = i# .+ +[ - � � _ r . : �1 � lEr �k� . . . . � � :r � � r:� . t. .�. . � • �� 't .} , � • . �1` • - �h�! ! _ _ r '�„ . � '�� + � - . . . � .. . - ° T 'f t.�'��.. . �' ` � + � _�` * � �.1�,� �` "'P s I . . . , ,� . � . . �� a n ..� ` ' .�`.- . � '� . - ° , . L �1:y . R r h " i '1 � , _. .t �*�� �� w, .,, k , 1 * �, , yy . � .� # 'F � __ ,+ ` . - + . .. . � ,. :. • - rP c� � , , � 1 Y�,- . ` 1 � ` s � . f tr � t4 �"" 1 • • � a • . , •' . . �+ ' + SP i� j 4 n �� 4 j . �. ' __ _ R . �. t �, 'm � % _ '. . . • ,? , . .;` `� " ., 1 . - �� R.. � � F � - a i@ ""°._� ' ',; . ..` ` . . , ., 1 ,� r + - - • � R ,�,� . �a . ,'�.� � , . � -.� _ . • ' :,i,�' ` � _ ' . . ►'r .7,t� 3 .� , �� +- t�� `' � ?�1���� { �� ��. ` �� Fwr 4'ai. ��� �.: . _ � � _ � . � � p -.` � ..�..� �'9�' �4 • .�i' _ . � .: � .. � � 5� .. �I�� �� y � Ci'.. +y,, .� _ _ .. - � ',/ .. � F � �' `'.4.. .. w . ' �" �, ":: I � • , `� . .. � . . � '.� � � � . 3 .�. � � �, t M�� � } �V T � . � : W ' ; , . ,., � � -..� } � } +-`� �; �.�"�' , � ` r. " E a ��' �'�,' �,+. � � + . J , .. . - .S' ' � .. .� �.. �•- _.�^ . � - ,,e . _ p y � . ' � - ��. . _ . r 4 _ ':. '�l �' ' t' ap � �ix� ` ] e 1: �' ' ��6 ] ,L y � _ . � �. � '�it ♦ ' � l , � � _ �. � _ - �T . � `i.} „� ' � � . , , . . , +� .: ,�- , + . •, - _ _,� � _ � � ,. . '� � � . Jlil�`. _ a�. . �.� � : �.. �" " � _ ` , ) � � � ' - � "��y, .. . <r �r {�., � . . . � `�' ` � •. .. '�* . �.,�, •Y�i •�.. " ,, , . � � . . • . �, Q tik •. ,�. � J J . `� _ ;, _ . L `* : � _ . y :1�� 1� � � �. _. , u � } � � . : . � . . , t r � � . !- a '� y �.. y: r �a , . . _ . � � �'+ .� �. # . ,. . ,�' :; y1 a : �.-,r �' � . �i' . r�. . _ _ .� � .. r ' . , + �` � ' � �. � } , +�rs � � _ .. ... .._ R�� �, . � � '� _- i ^� ' ^ �� ",��" • � � i �S�►� � y � • ,. ��� ` ,� �, _ � .� � � _ � - ` � V . t_ - �' ,f ° . . _ �� , - y ,n,�• , ,� „t ����.:'4, �f - � ' . ��� .. y�� , . • � . Y ` t � � .,,�'M'' . � i` V r � ' - '{ � . .. . __ � • �' - Y } v1F • � � . R . • - '�• '..! .�6'� • ' � . ',.- L �� � _ � � � � � _ _. N + # � . _ A. ' �A ?'. � � . +��, n ' � \`� ' - ° . ' - , � � � t� .� � � n�, .� �'� * 4 „ r i r _ �� , , . y ` --� . _ , " � � ' y: .. .. . . � .ft � ti."a 1c �ven T. _ • .� � ._ u._ . . � . , _ ��� ! J �� ;.� �� ' �,yi. � ,' - -•���i1e,t - . .. � - w, �' �: � . ]a� � •,5'� � .� � e .N • i ._ . �'� �. /1' . . � ' �� j l .4� �� y _ �,,� � ►,+� - i'i � . • . _ _ . .. . � • "� , , , .v� z � + �. � �` d • s ` � � . , .y'. `�'.. ,. , � - ° . k �i ' ^ �' "' J �. - 's�' - �F- , . i . , - . - M - . . . . .: , � � F ,. _ � - ., �, � . \ ��� A• � ` � . . '\la. . ,.# � ~' .1' �.� � 1 "� �'�� � .•��'� !�i � • .fliM' a \ . , . � � � � ._ . ' � y . . , . n. . s � . . a, .�� , � f . ..., , v � ' .� � '. � . -._ . . . . . . • . � ,.� . . ^ � .. � � �s � ^�" , a ..11 ': . ir r ` " .� "�'�. I _ "� � �'►_i ..cw �_ � «: � 'Mw.�i'� �' .�. . �..,��' �a�►� i �i ' � � � � �: ; , -- --__�- - -� =_- - - �� �_ � �► -- _ - _ ; ; i +� � ` � �' .. �. ;' . - � r ■ . - - . - �, � i� i: i . - i i� ; : t , , .� _.�_ , � - , � " _* ��� � �� � � f �'. � �� ii � . . 4 � - J�, ; �,� „ .. �, . . � . ,.� . � . � : � - - _. .: . r� � - ,. .. � ,� � �` � � ' � '�� � , ' ,,I �'°� �i ��.�: '�` - ' . - - II " ���r � � + � � - � - - - , , ,� � ' "� `�. ,�, - �: �' _ '� � ' � � 1 ,� ;,, . 1 , .,. • , - � ' _ , , - �.� , � ;� . .._ � �_: , �..,a.�� . . +R , � ; - - -- . �. . . . _ * � �, T. ` t► ` r �: � � 7 ' y. ` � - 1T � �� �1� f ��.� y � �. ��� all� � �� . . . �✓ . � i . '�' T°w�.., � _ _ �.. . .�� : .� . . ' ,i _ . .�_� .. - _ � . ia ' . . . . i ' :. - , r �� � �� -.. 7� _ ♦ � " . � . ,�' . ' . ' I � . _ _ _ ��. � ;{. �� R V � � • � �y : � ,* . � � _ . �• _ �. .. .. � � _ f � t � � ..- .. �_ - � .•, .; .� .� ' � .. _ _ - x . _ .� � . ... �� r� �. � �/ ' 4 , - .. . � � . � + s . n ' n. • . i �� ' . .. . .."" __ ' .' _ ' _' _ • • �. �e. _ .. . _ r . li . ! ' . . � '.. _ _ ''�'. � .. � f. . .j�� � � , A} ` ' _ - - , _ . -_ �_ � f � � � _ . . ` . M I� ' ! . � ' _ s ' � ' � ��r�� � � f �„ � � ' _ - —_ � s,� �1 •�r - • � -_ . �- ,� �� . - - . . _ _ _ _ . —. . �• � ^ �' � • � w Y, '. � . �. � �' � �,� �.� �;' �i '� �1 - � � � - .� �. .� I k � r � J � � _ . . - ' p y���� ,�, , . .. � ,;i, r� ... �,.- . . � f� � �' . .. � � � _ - , r . �.�� � �� . � X - - - - - ,� � F,� � `�;,' r _ � _ �' �'.� _ .r���� . �''+t � �c r�e - — — y � — � — � n� — — — _ a� rr :'� � � � ,��.' � -- �.�' .�- ` - . .. _ •is`- � ;i, .- ' . .� �,'�' ����h�nent 4 ,E .,_� Y.� <;�.�:: ; �:..,. 28 June 2011 ,..� , �F::=. ;<-3 <>:.:::,::.:.;t,:...,t Tom Johnson , .... . .. . .,�.. ;:, - sE ;a� Trillium Consulting ' `°' - 7901 Stoneridge Dr. #503 ' ''" ` '''�" Pleasanton, CA., 94588 � . _ . �. r���.r�=�. ;: �, ;....:,�; ; . �, Email: tjohnson@trilliumcos.com ,.�.. ._.. _ ..,.,.,:., � 3 _.. <t] 3 , .5;:�:� ;:�x. <�� ;. :.. , ':i*,., � #' � ���� Subject: AT&T CN4008 Rancho Deep Cliff Cell Site — Cell Equipment Property- _„ , ._._ ,. s:,;t�;�, r>�_ Line Noise f,i:�:.:;:.� f� .�..�?':Yiil::. ' ....., ....... , , _��: ;:�. ;� ��,� Dear Tom: :... , ,..:;E �,. . ' �" " This letter forwards our report on the cell equipinent noise levels at the AT&T West ;� _�.:��,�.. _.�.t„�.,._ ::� ;,, ,,,,;,,;;,,;._�, :� Cupertino site. This wireless communication project site is adjacent a residential �.:_�:� property-line and there is also an adjacent single-family residence on the cell site ;>:;:;,.;��.;�,,,<<;:::, prope ,<<.. : �z ;: . . , .�u:. �T ..: ... ... ....... .... � , ;;. , ;; � �; ;; PROPERTY-LINE 1�10ISE `'" "' `` "''`' Without any noise mitigation measures, including the enclosure wall currently part of the ; a ;.,, project plan, the cell equipment noise at the nearest properiy-line (to the north) is F,� � a.£,,, calculated to be approximately 60 dBA, above the City Noise Ordinance nighttime liinit _ �., r=��•i ��=,�, of 55 dBA. A change to a solid fence material (e.g. wood) at the proposed property-line �' �`"'"'"'`"` fence is calculated to reduce the property-line noise level to below the Ordinance '''"` nighttime limit. The calculated noise level on the residential side of the property-line �: .r �;,. ,,,;,; :�_,w,,;::,� fence is calculated to not exceed 52 dBA. "�= `;' "`t'"�`"�` Though the site plan indicates that the actual property-line is located between the ;�_;- ,�;�,., .: ,. : equipment and the proposed fence, it is our experience (and assumption for this analysis) ,;,>; that any noise measurements made pursuant to enforcement of the noise ardinance, �-� � would be made on the side of the fence opposite the equipment. _ .,., . ::.�:;_; �� i �� ` The property-line fence should be constructed of solid wood with gaps between boards ,,. .,.._ ,_. ,, and should close to grade at the bottom. The wood thickness should be at least 5/8-inch. -- This solid fence should extend along the property-line froin the equipment pad northeast , '"' "'''` "°"` corner to 15 feet west of the equipment pad northwest corner, and should also include the ' : t::<;:: ,:;:,�.�; ,;, ;,,; ;,,,,,, entire fence length along the east side of the equipment pad. �,::�....�.. ' , 146 ' I AT&T West Cupertino 28 March 2011 Page 2 I�OISE AT E�DJACENT 12ESIDENCE The cell equipment noise at the nearest likely occupied area of the adjacent residence (on the same property as the cell site) is calculated to be 52 dBA at the exterior. The A- : weighted sound transmission loss of a closed, inexpensive, thermally glazed window can be assumed to be approximately 20 dB. The interior noise level attributable to the AT$T cell equipment is therefor calculated to be approximately 32 dBA, well below the maximum interior noise level limit of 45 dBA required by the City. NoisE C�TEiva The City of Cupertino Code limits the equipment noise to 65 dBA during daytime hours (7:00 am to 10:00 pm), and 55 dBA during nighttime hours (10:00 pm to 7:00 am) at any location on adjacent private property. The City has issued a project requirement that the interior noise level at the interiar the , adjacent residence (on the same properiy as the cell site) not exceed 45 dBA. Based on our previous experience, we assume that this noise level limit applies to a closed exteriar window condition. CELL �+ QUIPMENT NOISE This analysis is based on a sound power level value far six of the proposed Ericsson ', WCDMA RBS 3601 radio base stations of 72 dBA at 40° C(104° F), transmitted to our ', office by Trillium Consulting. SITE I)ATA Locations and dimensions are based on the 06/16/11 "Revised Equipment Lease Area Location" project drawings. , We hope this information proves useful. Should you have any questions or comments, please call. I Best regards, Charles I�I. Salter Associates, Inc. ,% �, /' '-`-._.-�,.- ��' r-�- f Thomas A. Schindler P.E. � Vice President � � � � � ���a,�a�,��. �� ������' ��ti�m��a����� ��t.. i<t.i,.,�.9,.t.:t(i:i„�(;r).�<�#��d�.lt�,..S... .e4,.:i.E 4:::..?.,is�,�} .��c:,�.��?...�..r....,� �I 147 � I Aitachment 5 V�rizon �erele�� • Pr�posed ��se �t�#ion (�ite Noa 193�65 " Y��S� �LIp��II�IO 22475 ancho eep Gliff ri�e • upertino, Ca6ifiornia taternent of arnrnett dis�n, Inco, o��ultang Era ineer� The �r°rn of Hamznett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers, has been retained on behalf of Veiizon Wii•eless, a personal wireless telecommunications carrier, to evaluate the base station (Site No. 19386� "West Cupertino") proposed to be located at 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive in Cupertino, Califoi�nia, for compliance with appropriate guidelines luniting huznan exposut•e to radio frequency ("RF") electromagnetic fields. Execufii�e �urrarnary Verizon and AT&T propose to install directional panel antennas on a tall steel pole, configured to resemble a pine tree, located at 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive in Cupertino. The proposed operations will comply with the FCC guidelines limiting public exposure to RF energy. Prevailing xposur� Standards The U.S. Congress requires that the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") evaluate its actions for possible significant impact on the environment. A summary of the FCC's exposure limits is shown in Figure 1. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health, The most restrictive FCC liinit for exposures of unlullited duration to radio frequeucy energy for several personal wireless services are as follows: Wireless Service Frec�uencv Band Occu�ational Li�nit Public Lunit Microwave (Point-to-Point) 5,000-80,000 MHz 5.00 mW/cin 1.00 mW/cin BR5 (Broadband Radio) 2,600 5,00 1.00 AWS (Advanced Wireless) 2,100 5.00 1.00 PCS (P�rsonal Cominunication) 1,950 5.00 1.00 Cellular �70 2.90 0.5� SMR (Specialized Mobile Radio) 855 2,�5 0.57 700 MHz 700 2,35 0.47 [most restrictive frequency range] 30-300 1.00 0.20 Gener�9 Facility Requirerr�ents Base stations typically consist of two distinct parts: the electronic transceivers (also called "radios" or "channels") that are collnected to the traditional wired telephone lines, and the passive anteiu7as that send the wireless signals created by the radios out to be received by individual subscriber w�its. The transceivers are often located at ground level and are connected to tl�e antennas by coaxial cables. A small antenna for reception of GPS signals is also required, mounted with a clear view of the sky. � _ �� I�1��1���' � E�1�o1�t, �1vC. •' CONSULTII�TG ENGII�EEPS B9ZO ,., a s�tvFaa.vcJSCO Page 1 of4 148 10erazon irele�s • roposed a�e tatiora ( ite o. 193�6� " est Cupe I�O 22475 ancho eep Cli rive • Cupe�in�, Califor�ia Because of the short wavelength of the fi•equencies assigned by the FCC for wueless services, the antennas require line�of-sight paths for their signals to propagate well and so are installed at some height above gi T�ie antennas are designed to concentrate their energy toward the horizon, with very little energy wasted toward the sky or t11e ground. Along with the low power of such facilities, this means that it is generally not possible for exposure conditions to approach the maximum pei7nissibl� ex�osure limits without being physically very near the antei�titas. Cornputer Modeling Me�hod The FCC provides direction for determining compliance in its Office of Engineerin� and Technology Bulletin No. 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC-Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation," dated August 1997, Figure 2 attached describes the calculation methodologies, reflecting the facts that a directional antenna's radiation pattern is not fully formed at locations very close by (the "near-field" effect) and that at greater distances the power level from an energy source decreases with the square of the distance fi•oin it (the "inverse square law"). The conservative nature oI' this method for evahzating exposure conditions has been veri�ed by numerous field tests. �ite and F�cility Des�ripti�n Based upon infonnation provided by Verizon, including zoning drawings by L.D. Stroebel Co., Inc., dated June 10, 2010, that canier proposes to install six Andi�ew directional panel antennas — two Model DBXLH-6565A-VTM, and one each IVlodels DBXLH-6565B-VTM, LNX-0513DS-T4M, LNX-6513DS-TOM, and LNX-6514DS-TOM — on a new 64-foot steel pole, configured to resemble a pine tree, to be sited near the building located at 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive in Cupertino. The antennas would be n�ounted with up to 6° downtilt at an effective height of about 62 feet above ground and would be oriented in pair� (one DBXLH and one LNX) toward 20°T, 110°T, and 210°T. The m�i�num effective radiated power in any direction would be 2,100 watts, representing simultaneous operation at 1,500 watts for cellular and 600 watts for 700 MHz service; there is proposed no operation on PCS Frequencies at the site. Based upon information provided by AT&T, including zonin� drawings by Connell Design Group, LLC, dated April 5, 2011, that carrier proposes to install nine Kathrein Model 800-10765I� directional panel antennas on the same steel pole, inounted with up to 4° downtilt at an effective height of about 52 feet above ground and oriented in groups of three toward 10°T, I 10°T, and 210°T. The maximum effective radiated power in any direction would be 7,250 watts, representing simultaneous operation at 1,890 watts for AWS, 2,860 watts for PCS, 1,510 watts for cellular, and 990 watts for 700 MHz se�vice. 3 ` Hl��ili/iE'3"I' �z EI)I50N, ��tC. � � cousuLTUac sNC�r�ERS B9Z0 , ' s,�N r�z�vcisco Page 2 of 4 149 Verizon ireless • ropc�sed a�e �ateon ( ite o. 193�6 66 �S� 6�I.Ip��II�HO 22475 ancho eep Cli rive • upe�ino� C�liforr�ia Study Resu9�s For a person anywhere at ground, the maximum RF exposure level due to the proposed Verizon operation by itself is ca.lculated to be 0.�068 m�J/cm�, wl�ich is 1.3% of the applicable public exposure limit. The maximum calculated cuinulative level for the simultaneous operation of both carriers is 2.5% of the public exposure liinit. The maxiiniun calculated cumulative level at the second- floor eievation of any nearby building� woutd be 3.9% of t�ie public exposure Iimit. It should be noted that these results include several "worst-case" assumptions and therefore are expected to overstate actual power density levels. N� Recornmend�d Mit6g�tion Meas�res Due to their mounting locations, the Verizon and AT&T antennas would not be accessible to the general public, and so no mitigation measures are necessary to comply with the FCC public exposure guidelines. It is presumed that the carriers will, as FCC licensees, talce adequate steps to ensure that their employees or contractors comply with FCC occupational exposure guidelines whenever w�rk is required near• the antennas themselves. Concltasoon Based on the information and analysis above, it is the undersigned's professional opinion that operation of the base station proposed by Verizon Wireless at 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive in Cupertino, California, will coinply with the prevailing sta.ndards for limiting public exposure to radio frequency energy and, therefore, will not for this reason cause a significant impact on the environment. The highest caleulated level in publicly accessible areas is nluch less than the prevailing standards allow for exposures of unliinited duration. This �nding is consistent with measurements of actual exposure conditions talcen at other operating base stations. * Including the nearby residcnces. ; ; :'. I�L�Ii/II!/IETI' �S EI�I90I�d, I�1C. B9Z0 ? - x CONSULTING ENGIAEERS ' �_ _,. ." s�N F�u��c�.sm Page 3 of 4 150 V�rizon ir�l�ss • ropose a�e St��i�n ( ite No. 193 6" est u�r�ino"� 2475 ��cho �ep �li rive • u er�ano, Ca9ifornia cathor�hip The undersign�d author of this stateinent is a qualifi�d 1'rofessional Engineer, holding California Registration No. E-1 �063, which expires on June 30, 2013. This work has been carried out under his direction, and all statements are ti•ue and correct of his own knowledge except, where noted, when data has been supplied Uy others, whach data he believes to be correct. .�°�. �,a���S;,� I��s,�',� r r �� �.�� �k�'' �gr� . � � ' F ..< ` r''"m" � � � • b � � at � athur, .E. ' � �" ; a�, �;-1 �C� � �+t � '707/996-5200 June 17, 2011 ��, � ���-;;�! } �' �� �� r � ti �� ����� ; ���������.�� a ��� ����� �. a s �`t` ..,. .r%����'�� 4gL ��I.��� 1��. �� r «� ^' CONSULTI�IG HNGINHERS B9ZO <;+!: �`i saN raaNCrsco Page 4 of 4 151 FCC �dio Freq�aency rotection aaide The U.S. Congress reQuired (1996 Telecom Act) the �'ederal Communications Cormnission ("FCC") to adopt a nationwide huinan exposLU•e standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a significant impact on the environment. The FCC adopted the limits from Report No. 86, "Biological Effects alld Exposure Criteria foi° Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," published in 19�6 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and 1Vleasurements ("NCRP"). Separate liinits apply for occupational aild public exposure conditions, with the latter liinits �enerally five times more restrictive. The more recent standai•d, developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and ap�roved as Aznerican National Standard AN�SI/IEEE C95.1-2QQ6, "�afety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequelicy Electromagnetic Fields, 3 1cHz to 300 GHz," includes similar limits. These limits apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. As shown in the table and chart below, separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter liinits (in italics and/or dashed) up to five times more restrictive: Fre uency Electromagiletic Fields (f is fi•ec�uency of emission in MHz) Applicable Elect� Magnetic Equivalent Far-Field Range Field Strengtll Field Strength Power Density (MHz) (V/m) (Alm) (mWlcm`) 0,3 — 1.34 614 614 1.63 1.63 100 100 1,34— 3.0 614 823.8/f' 1.(3 2.19/f 100 180/f 3A — 30 1842/ f 823.8/f 4.89/ f 2,19/f 900/ f' 180/f' 30 — 300 61,4 27.5 0,163 0.0729 I.0 0.2 300— 1,500 3.54'�f 1.59�(f �f/106 �(f/238 f/300 f/IS00 1,500— 100,000 137 61.4 0,364 0.163 5.0 1.0 1000 Occupational Exposure ,� 100 pC� N � Cell � �� � 10 � FM ♦ �' � � 1 � � � � �� � 0.1 Ptcblic E.� oszfre 0.1 1 10 100 10 10 10 Frequency (MHz) Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty miinates, for occupatioi�al or puUlic settings, respectively, do not exeeed the limits, and higher levels also are allowed for exposures to small areas, such that the spatially averaged levels do not exceed the liinits. However, neither of these allowances is incorporated in the conservative calculation formulas in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technolo�y Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) for projectin� field levels. Hanullett � Edison 11as built those for�nulas into a proprietary prograin that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual radio sources. The program allows for the description of buildings and un�ven ten•ain, if required to obtain more accurate projections. , ' IIAIVIIVdE'I"I' Rt EI)I�ON, II�dC, coNSULTivc ENCU.iEERS FCC Guidelines . , � " °�3 SAN bRANCL5C0 F1gUC0 I 152 F,C LC�� alcula#ion e#hodoio y s�es�ment by Calculatoorr of Co pliance vv�th FCC xpostare u�delin�s The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ( to adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a significant impact on the environment. The maximum permissible exposure li�nits adopted by the FCC (see Figure 1) apply for continuous exposures from all solirces and are intended to provide a pi inargin of safery for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the lilnits. Near Fieldo Prediction methods have been developed for the near field zone of panel (directional) and whip (omnidirectional) antennas, typical at wireless telecoinmunications base stations, as well as dish (aperture) antennas, typically used for microwa.ve lii�lcs. The ailtenna patterns are not fully fo17i1ed in the near field at these antennas, and the FCC Oftice of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) gives suitable formulas for calculating power density within such zones. For a panel or whip antenna, power density �= 8 0 ��x D P �x h' in ���W/�rn2� sw O.1x16x��xP and for an aperture antenna, maximum power density smax — � X h2 , in mW/cm where 6gyV = half-power beamwidth of the antenna, in degrees, and Pnet = net power input to the antenna, in watts, D= distailce from anteuua, in meters, h= aperture height of the antenna, in meters, and a� = apertuz�e efficiency (unitless, typically 0,5-0.8). The factor of 0,1 iil the ntunerators cor7verts to the desired units of power density. Far Field. OET-65 gives this formula for calculating power density in the far field of an individual RF source: power density S= 2.56 x 1.64 x 1Q0 x RFF x ERP 4 x a�t x DZ , in mW/cm where ERP = total ERP (all polarizations), in lulowatts, RFF = relative �eld factor at the direction to the actual point of calculation, and D= distance from the center of radiation to the point of calculation, in meters. The factor of 2,56 accounts for the increase in power density due to ground reflection, assurning a reflection coefficient of 1,6 (1.6 x 1,6 = 2.56). The factor of 1.64 is the gain of a lialf-wave dipole relative to an isot�opic radiator. The factor of 100 in the nuinerator convei to the desired units of power density. This formula has been built into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density froin any nuinber of individual radiation sources. The pro�ram also allows for the description of uneven terrain in the vicinity, to obtain more accurate projectioils. ' �� °'�� HAI�1iiE'i"I' � EI�I501�T, I1�C. �' `� - Methodolo _ � j CONSL �NGIN�HRS gY . ._;; s�Nr�za��cLSCO Figure 2 153 Aitachment 6 Rancho Deep Cliff Verizon/AT&� Alternative Sites Map �`.�C�'���!;Jh` $'���..! f i[EM i�..i!t �L' ��� � _E-�'��7?���� Ye, .,`�s'is'�.z'¢C {����L�����{'i+F�^e�a 'Sg � 4a I x" s � �I f�t' Ir1�i ./� h �'". f � � �' f � � ��F � C4: 4 �s�'��S `�°r ir .� +� � � � � f ! s ,�;. � � '��Rr!, r?P� '��f,•�` �'��F ��IF����` '�` �«�' �na�� - � �r�� �vt` � � '!� � �i�7F r ��f i�.�f'�fi��� .�' {C���� �.����'.'rFa 7 � t � � ;� F �[ak ����� � �- `� � f +: t- s '.r=3 � � y, -� �JF' F' t� ��� � Gd C� 9 u�' "�"' s f �. � Xp,�- � �,- � I� E'' � �'� r�. e.�F � � � _ ..� � 4i Eo � . , � � � " � .r, � .�_`,�� wF `_ � �i � '�+ f� E �'"' � � � �� � i �.q'>�a (�� � �e ii'�ye i, ��� ; �G�t�'k�4x�'�� �F' �T� �'�" MCCLELLAN RD� �: j' ����� �," �"�' � i �? � • � L� � � w�ss �] Ii� � � �'' �' ' z" � F#-°g � � r� � � , � dC a37'!F ,� , �e ,�. ' :�� �� s � �, ' '; 4t . � �� P� � � � 1 }:t �`�+ I� ` � r. A'�� �'", t "� 'M�L C `���� 1�� E` !..=� ` ,� ��� �C�'�� �t?���o- � �,� ,� �„� �"� �,� 3l: � � ��d �" [� �. �� .� pa � �-� � � R �'� ' � �: i � �w t" � f �' ' ' � .� � •- ^� � �! � � ���, � �� �� b Y` f F4� `" � 1 � r�T �: Cr"�° }( /d'/� l �'. e � ��' a , . ,�� a a �,k �t��{ t ,,5��, ; `o y �,r:?IY�Yr 1r' �, . ���,�-wigi'"�� '� � ���� �� -��„�s=' ��`��� k`"- r t f�? f � � 1 �.L. r r + nk �I 7 � � r �. fi �' � ,.. f — � , t :� . � � ^ `� `� _ �° � �4��` .r.�' �',�i �.'fi � � � '' � ' 'i ��� r � �� ��'�'�� - } rhs�,� atA\' ` .:.�„�� � ���ng��r���ty� � 'I �ai �t!"r_4 � �f � � -� { a r+�Cs� t� �1 r � !�'. Q`1 �� �,�� ,r�`i , ;� + � °� -m � �M� `�'��� '� a.. �. _`��' _ �� �'t. 'I ;� x f 4 � 4✓ a rt' ,r i ,< r Rr � s_ u �i. � i r t fq 1",}e �T' ' � ,�+ ��.t E.� t��- ,� p Z �� � �' �'� � '~� ,� �'�'' � � a 6 �lr F :� '1 � 6 - ' � � � r! _2 d`G� � 'r! �if I . t .s� � h � I , � I�` r ei4•,,��°>{''�� �tr��a '�'�Y�; ` F,� ����� '��` .�`� h ' . ��J t a �£l d '�*� M c.� �x . �j. Y� ri- ,� f t r +'�' .. q' ��i e �k . r � � r° . : a �. �' < .it � �^ � ��r� 1y� �r.;a,� �y, }.,�,,•. F w : � t {, . . r t� r t {'` ji � 4. ��'. � v . , ,�,.a ,�G`! ��Y�'� c' - x5� �.. 2�4�� !� 'l'_ '' - � b'_ L' FP�'- `p �5.4'�' 9 � �. �� �-°•rr � � . . � �+ � � ti y �, !� 4 r : '?� �. f � a �� � {� � R y� et � _, F . , �r jF� , i ✓ � r.'R 'KS. h • d " 2.r � . S�il' i Q� '� IF � C f 4' 1' 'S� E. � 1 R �ys y 4 .. ft ';s ° � - k�i • ..�Y „'an„+ ¢"".<,� E �,.ir M .�,. � ,� ��s.p � ; �,. _�,.� ��.,�� �-._ � `'•� �,� *i J- �'-vPE' P ; .t � s� � ', . � . �F ��T'� a I E , � '�e � � „#��r?4. �'°i 1 .,v •,��,. � g i � � ! _ -'"' �r �, �. �- �r �. y .L+f � ,� µ as �r ' rr r ! � ? �" M: R' F" � ,'� .' .K � d. •�. �` r �� �� e��t� � � �f �..� � sg . � � '� �� r �s -.�*� � d � � y �r e Ci� . -�. �" r w�v a±� � r- ^e� u;. aA � R �; � 4 ,�. •' r r -r � �� � e� � i� � �"..2 L.R�r +. � ���'k:•c� � .'1�? �;r � � • ' �`!`' '��` �� ,�'. . Cy�f 't a: ,`���f:��`� r�:�i � a�` � . f f a ' µ K � ; > r,� � � - � , �.t ,€, ��.�� ` � ,�, 4 ��r xF F-� ax�' r��' �s,� �• �' � .� t- s� �+•• .aa. . �� a��F ] � .�. � a ' ' 4rt,Fr,l �,,.i'���:•,.hr � .�� � . �.�� . � s�a!IS ��:^♦ � 4�i �-� O `�`° �a ��r��S� '� � '� fv � 'r :���#" �' � �6'•�fM - *�' sa t �+,c � �_ { .i F � �� ,�• ' ,w"'� � .' � �„er..' � `�9 u G '+ r "1�s`.R f ` �' . w �IF' . 'xr� �, '� �r. �'�yr""` {�� � � S." f� � L F ! aK r �a � -'t-� ;�i��� :� r [r , �'°�a�°'." s `° '�'_ # ��a� �� ��i��i �f�i,Ec� ° � .. =t - i� e wC F t � d. ^�. x p Ik 5 ����1 h�'�5� .�1 i ��#�� f„-a "'� s'&+. F+ `�' , . ��� s�°`�`��: ��.��,¢ ���t.." K���� '�e���a�' � S � s S3. � � !r,- S"r�1��. � ��`ff '� b,E w r "S� �' �+i�I3* _y't '� t h ��d 7 osi , � i c 1 ; 'r° �' �5.� � . .:.ir 'E �� 01 � � n' � s', r t.T . Py. �. � c � r ` ..``�' t`.fd^ E�� � '; 'r3l �;�* � � j ' *:� ��. �. �t t � rs ' ° ' �m•�. ,. , , q, � 0 w. �'' �" ► T `i� 9 � '� . } � '� A �,, '"' b►►' '�t x �' [F a1 ' : ��' � 1' ��'s �i�� + � . �. � � � � �' �C 4 ,� s � - �r krt �. 's ,�rg� , ��' r �+ �:'r�. ` -f �, c rF�.�,,,�,. �, ` ��•i� ��,,$� ��n�F�.'v, ' �.-.`� ,�' �2 f�u�f ��- 'r�' :y �C� g�� ,�r-s ��'t ' ' �,: ,_ � 'd„'�`� 'M . d �' �+6,. � ° . �, . .� i� h •.,:' � s .° t,_ 4g lY �3 � � u� T .s� 'P' j. � �'. _ '� F � a �q�.�� ..: � Y. �s'�� .� ' � ..=: 5`� � ..�k' x _. p � r �, r7�p� �.� 'd t�i Y � r � �-� �sr . � :,,�`iF� j " ' � . e ,e ►�y`, �� �,n���st�� � 4 �*� r t,.,� � R�•T� �,'. . ri�r�r.�, k��Fk�C�r PIi C � ��� { s a' l i f 5 * S� � 1} I A.. ... k � �' � 7 ' ��'�7r �' �l ��� Y s 3, � . N F - y l . . t , q ��'� ' "' �7� f { �f Y a . � � ! .« "� �4� t�*� � r T a :��� a�.Y e��� . t � �' �'.f dF ' � Y1k ��c.Pt� r N5�4�'�F +� g '�'i JF ^� � �` . a g°� : � � _" � rti _ ! ^� , r - �.: * �+'� � � �� i er� �'� � � r: ld �1' {C � 1E V ' � �; d r 'i.� s� �, ti i' t s �� �;- �, - -��, r'�'" e � ro " � > � � � e L + � � � � � ^° � t tN�p k.. � Fi �. '�'!4 � � k r�. y, �'����,�s 1 7 , ��+: � s� � �, � �� t'� j� �, �,. I�''it �.�.� �f��l� ��c r � iJ,� �' i : �' h v'Y�1�' _. �,. .. {(�� ! �';' "j Y r � f ;'9'r� ., .Y-� �" 1f , . �� � .�..�A..: ._. ' � � ��. .. _ � . ., - ��TRM . f � 13� . �. v �'G'��� � t .��. ,k . Proposed Verizon & AT&T Cell Site � Repeaters & Microcells- various locations I � i _ I 154 Attachment 7 CITY OF CIJPEItT'II�O 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, Califo�rua 95014 (408) 777-3262 To: Planning Commis�ion Co1in Jung, 5enior Planner From: Rod Livingood Technology, Information & Communications Comin.ission (TICC) Date: May 5, 2011 Subject: Comments on Referral of Proposed Verizon Wireless and AT&T Mobility Collocated Personal Wireless Service Facility at 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive, Cupertino We discussed last night at the TICC meeting and the following considerations need to be made. Before approval, consideration needs to be made for noise abatement. ATT did not subrnit a noise engineering study which is required. Additionally, the co-location of two equiprnent areas within close proximity increases the total ambient noise. �Terizon had requested variance on noise alone and combined the noise level is expected to exceed the noise regulations. Peter, I and others both staff and TICC thought this needs to be resolved. 155 CITY OF CLJPEIt'I'II�10 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (40�) 777-3262 To: P1aiu1ulg Coizunission Colin Jung, �enior Planner From: Peter Friedland, Chair Technology, Information �z Communications Coinini��ion (TICC) Date: April 28, 2011 Subject: Comments on Referral of Proposed Verizon Wireless and AT&T Mobility Collocated Personal Wireless Service Facility at 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff Drive, Cupertino I have reviewed all the documents concerning the Deep Cliff application. I support the applications and exception strongly for the following reasons: 1. The area is a particularly bad one for current coverage as documented by the TICC survey. 2. The new tower replaces an existing one with a design that I believe is esthetically considerably more pleasing. 3. The residents of Deep Cliff, as represented by their governing board (whose chair appeared personally at TICC meeting to request TICC assistance in improving their cell phone coverage), support the new tower. 4. The tower will contain antennas for both AT�iT and Verizon, the two major carriers for the city of Cupertino. Peter Friedland Chair, TICC 156 Attachment 8 October 5, 2011 City of Cupertino tl Planning I�eparhnent 10300 Torre Avenue Ct�pertino, California 95014 Attn: I�Ir. �olin Jun�, �en�or ]Plariner It�: �lerizon i�Tireless 'Teleconununication Facility Installation in C I��ar Colin: �Te az°e pleased to report that with an �6% posi�ive vote, the Rancho Deep Cliff I�OA has approved the Option and Land Lease Agreerrient with Verizon �1Vir�less, which will allo� a ne�v t�lecommunicatian facili� to be built in our Comrr�on Area. V47e request that the following Conditions of l�t��roval b� included in any and all City permits issued for tl�s project. l. The �1ZW concrete pad and ground equiprnent needs to be lowered to the paved : sidewalk level in the Cognmon Ar�a adjacent to 22475 Rancho Deep Cliff I�rive, This �quipment (ex�luding tl�e Collocatable Nlonopine T'ower) is to be enclosed within a wooden fence. 2. The City will mo�itor the equipment nois� level �n �t the IZancho I�eep Cliff proparty line to the norti� to �nsure that tl�e equipment rneets all City ordinanc�s arid r�gulations cove�ing daytirne a.nd �v�nin� r�oise levelse Vexizon is to add any addit�onal noise buffer�ng if th� homeowners listed b�lo�r are mater�ally affect�d by increased noise levels due smlely to cell phone to�ver equipment. All costs r�lated to noise aneasurements and mitigation measures shall b� borne by the installer, 3. IJpon completion of in�tallation, �I�rizon is to provide ENIig rnea�ur�ments � microwatts per square c�n�imeter �.t the addresses listed below. If the measurements ex�eed the levels defined in the I� e�t and Edison, Iric report dated 6417�1 l, �Ierizor� vv�11 complete at theit° cost the �ecessary a�aodification� to the ce11 phon� tawer equipment to meet that standard. 22395 Rancho Deep Cliff ��ive 22415 lt�.ticho I�eep ClifF '�r� 22435 cho I�eep Cli#'f l�rive 22455 Tlancho I�eep Cliff I���ve 22456 lZancho l�eep �liff I�r�ve I'lease be sure that the�e �eq�irements are included in the Cit�r Per�at for this irastalla�ior�. Sinc�rely, ! , '�, I��r�nefla �. Naylo�, Pr�sident Igancho Deep C1iff I�orneovaners Association i i 157 ABBREVIATIONS A.9. ANCHOR BOLT A.G.L. A60VE GROUND LEVEL ADJ. AOJUSTABLE ALUM. ALUMINUM AP°ROX. AFPROXIMATE ArZCH. ARCHITECTURAL A.S. AS SHOWN A'NG AME'�ICAN WIRE GAUGE BLDG BUILDING BLK. BI.00K ELKG. B�OCKING BMU BRICK MASONRY UNIT fiA. B07TOM CF 80�. 6CTTOM B.T.S. BASE TRA�SCEiVER STATION 6?wri BETWEE�V CAa. CA8INET C�.P. CBBTR�L.iElEACE CIG. CEIL!NG CLR. CLEAR C.U.0 CONCRETE MASONRY UNI? COL. COLUMN CONC. CCNCRET� CONN. CONNECTICN C.J. CONS7RUCT10N JOIN7 CONT. CCNTINUQUS C�. CEN��R Cu COPPER 06L. DOUBL= otr. oETai� oi�. oiA,uErE� CIM. CIMENSION owc. cRa,��nNc (�) Ex�sr�rvc EA. EACN cL=C. EL=CT�iICA� �.O.S. EDGE OF SLAa EL=V. EL=VATION EMBED. EuEEDMENT E0. ECUAL ECUIP. EQUIPMENT EXIST. EXISiING ExP. JT EX?ANSION JOINT EXT. EXTERIOR =.0. FACE OF F.O.C. FACE OF CONCRET� r.0.:�i. FACE OF MASONRY =.O.S. FACE CF STUO .O.W. FACE CF WALL ^ N. FLR F!NISHED F!_GCR =LR F'_OOR �rc. Foonrvc �,a. ca,uc� GALV. GALVANIZ=� GL9 GLU-LAMIIvA�=� 6EAM GRNC GnCUND HORIZ. HORIZCNTAL �" �E!c�r i.J. iN51DE DiAMETER !NCL INCLU�E LONG. LONGITUDINAL MAS. �tASONRY MAX. MAXIMUM U.9. MACHINE 60LT UECH. MECHANICAL NFR. MANUFACTURE� UIN. UINIMUM MISC. uISCELLANECUS UTL, uETAL (u) NEw N.�.C. NATIONAL EL=CTRIC CODE �u.;.c. Nor �N ccNr�.�cr N.T.S. NCT TO SCALE �0. NUMBcR o.c. O.D. CPP. ?.C.S. PL PR. PLY. ROWD REINr. REO'D S.A.O. SCHE�. SEC. S. F. SHT. SHT'G SIM. SQ. S. S. S.S.D. STD. 5 TL. STRUCT T. & G. rc� TNND r. o. T.O.C. T.O.M. T.O.S. r.o.w. rs. r. & a. TYP. U.B.C. U.O.N. VERT. V.I.F. W W/0 W.O. w� � GRIC �EF=RE:�C= � GROUT CR ?'_AS-=: � O (=) BRICK �• QETAi� REFERE�Cc �T � (E) MASCNRY �• DETAIL IN ScCT10N � CONCRETc 31T. • \ \ \ \ EAR"-; ��. , PAr�T1AL HE'GHT �. ScCTiCN o°ooa GRAVEL � FLY'NOCD �Ef.' � FULL HEIGHT �cCT10N - `,� SANu O � woco SCHEDU�� IicM CONT. O SE� PLAN � w000 BLQCKING � REVISiCN � S C=� ##-1� �_EVa,-:Crv orv c�Nr�� OUT�IDE DIAMET"c� OP ° O51 Tc PERSOrvAL COMMUN SER`nrES PLATE PAIR P�YWOCO RE�WC00 REiNFORCE RECUIRED ScE ARCH. DWGS. SCHEDULE S�CiION sau,�R� Focr SHEET S�iEATHING SMILAR S�UARE STAINL=SS S-=E_ ScE STRI.'C?URAL DR?`NI�VGS STANDARG STE�L STRUCPJRP.L TONGUE & GROOVE T�MP�rtED GLASS TINNE� TOP OF TOP OF CONCRETE TOP CF MASONR'! roP cF s�Aa roP oF w��� TUBE STE�L TOP AND BOTTuM TY?ICAL UNIFORM BUILDING COCE UNLE55 OTNERwISE N0"_D VER�CAL VERIFY IN F'ELD WITH WITHOU` WHERE OCCURS wooc RF I N FORMATION # OF ANT�;�NA � CF "CAX ;,OAX Sc:.TuR AZIMU7}' CENTERLINE AN i�NNAj �AOOE�_ � C.OAX LINE� DIA,HEi=� i ENGTri 4 10' �2' 4 PCWE�WAVE 12 ��g 8�� D9X,tiH-55o"�c�-R2M � z' � a POWER'NAVE 12 7/8" 80' DBX�H-"o�6jB-R2M � '' �� �2' 4 POWER`NAV'E 12 7/8" 8C' `JBX�H-6�o"�B-R2N r,/a, r,/a r,/.a z cPS 2 �/z" 2s' SITE QUALIFICATION PARTICIPANTS CONNELL DESIGN GROUP, LLC CONSLZTING CI[� EYGGY 25t1J XANCIfO PAid'AdPSOIlIN, LIKe' FOR£57: G1 92630 (919J iS3-B8070FFICE- /9(9J 7l}-d833 FAX BECHTEL: C.E. RASK PHONE: (925) 983-2320 AT3T M081L1TY RF: MICHAEL CUINTO PHONE: (562) 2�9-8265 =^,�=7 .VC � — MA-CH LINE �— NCRK PGINT CODE COMPLIANCE ALL WORK de MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED de INSTALL�p IN ACCOROANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING COOES AS ADCPTcD BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITiES. NO7}iING IN THESE PLANS IS BE CCNSTRUCTED TO PERMIT WGRK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CCOES t. 201C CAl1FORNIA ADMINISTRATiVE COCE (INCL TiTLES 24 & 25). 2. 2010 CAUFORNIA BUILDING COOE — 3. 2a10 CAL'FORNIA ELECTRICAL CCOE Trillium Telecam Services 7901 STONERI�GE DRIVE, SUITE 503 4. 2010 CALJFORNIA MECNANICAL COOE PLEASANTON, CA 94588 5. 2a10 CALIFORNIA PLUM8ING COOE 6. LOCAL FIRE COCES dc NFPA srre �cAU�SmoN 7. LOCAL BUILDING COOES TOMJOHNSON PHONE: (714) 20�2879 8. CITY�COUNTY OROINANCES LAND USE PLANNER 9. ANSI�EfA-11A-222-G VALERIE TALLERICO PHONE: (714) 4145s18 ALONG 'MTH ANY OTHER APPUCABI� LCCAL dc STATE LAwS AND REGUl.AT10NS A6EDESIGNER ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS .IOE CONNELL PHONE: (949) 306�65o THIS FACIUTY IS UNMANNED k NOT FOR HUMAN HA81TAT10N. ACCESSIBILITY ACCESS & REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA STATE ADMINISTRA?IVE COOE, TITL 24 PART 2, ScC?lON 11058.J.4.2, EXCEPTION 1 �•�� AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC. 4430 ROSEWOOD DRIVE., BLDG 3 PLEASANTON, CALIFORNIA 94588 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DR. CI�PERTINO, CA 95014 SYMBOLS AND MATERIALS o ti'E'N .�VTNN,4 � EXISTING AiVTE�NAS ��� ASP4ALT � CCNCR�TE eGl ELECTRIC �OX � UGHT POLE � =�VO. MONUME�VT � S?OT ELEVATION �, ScT POINT -.4-;�- COAX CAB�= RUN TO ANTENNA -P-P- E! ECTRICAL CONDUIT -i-T- TEL'tPNONE CON�UIT — - — C�NTER UNE — -- — pqppF�?Y UNE PROJECT SUMMARY APPLICANT/LESSEE: � , = AT&T �� ��► �► .aT3 i 'rt"i"r;L�E�S SERVICES, LtiC. 4430 RO�EW'OOD DRIVE, BLDG. 3 PLE:�AriTON, G� 94588 PROPERTY OWNER RANCHO DEEP CLIFF HOA 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 CONTACT: SAUL HOFFMAN (408) 446�369 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROJECT CONSiSTS OF THE INSTALLAIION OF (8) OU�COR CABINETS INSlDE A NEW 7'-0' REDWOCO FEVCE ENCLOSURE. INSTALL (12) ANTENNAS, (6) RRU'S, (36) COAX, (9) DTMA'S, (24) RET'S ONTO (E) 70' MONaPINE (8Y OTHERS). THE SYSTEM NALL TRANSMIT AND REC�IVE RADIO SIGNALS FOR A REGIONAL PCS NETWORK. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS EACH BTS EOUIFMENT CABINET HAS A MAXIMUM OF EIGHT BAT'iERIES. EACH BATTERY CONTAINS 3.3 OUARTS OF ACID FOR A MAXIMUM OF 26.4 QUARTS OF AGD PER BTS CABINET. Attachment 9 SHEET INDEX T1 TITLE SHEET F1 BATTERY SPECS C1 SURVEY A1 SlTE PLAN A2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN A2.1 EQUIPMENT 8� ANTENNA LAYOUT A3 ELEVATIONS A4 EQUIPMENT DETAILS A5 EMERGENCY / RF SIGNAGE SIT INF SITE ADORESS lEA3E SPACE 22475 RANCHO OEEP CUFF DR 384.5 SQ Ff. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 AP p���� BUILOtNG SUMMARY ATST OCCUPANCY: 'B' (TELEPHONE EXCHAHG� 14�0 R03EW000 DR BIDG 3, BTH FLOOR TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V�8 PLEASANTON, CA 44588 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL3: BATrERlES PQ (SEE F-1) PGdE TELEPHONE AT3T APN 358-02-032 ATST RF S1TE OESIGN FORM REV.1.0, JUNE 7RD 20�0 �ATUM POINTS NAD83 DATUM LATfTU OE: 37' 18'78.81'N LONGfTUOE: 1�2°04' 09.40'YV DEGIMAL LAT. 37.3148 DECIMAL LONG. •122.0893 a � � � d d I� CC Iq � O ��I a � zl a O OI � N N � O o Q Gs. c=� V� A A Z � � 0 � � (n �+ .� W d o 0 � Q O O � L� J U a W U O 0 O a0 U � p z O � n�., o O S � � `t � U Z � U � U � O e � o z E � Z o 0 T] Z U � e ° ° i ¢ L a in F�l � LJ r � � � 0 0 6 < < 1- O � - --- ti - � - J v J Y 1 �� y � R �?�� � y � � � ` � V � � W G4 ��X� J W�� O z : � �. � C.J � z � C•: � J ,,- x >� � - P � ^� � � c¢ (J] C U � 3z � �; o ,�,� c Z � C oa I ' ^ nw I 3 �� Q. �d Q ScaL: CN4008 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF D CUPERTINO, CA 95a14 SHE� TiTL: TITLE PAGE SH�i NUMBE.7: T1 VICINITY MAP ::�tE�t3N1 w� <.., � . � ALL hlDRTHSTAR Pr��DUCTS ARE C01�APLlANT WfTH: - �elcorCia SR4228 + Beitcare GR-fi�Cnre, Issue � * DOT4SCFR173 159(d) {} and (i) � UL Approvnl • 3ritish and Gomnn telewm standards NOMOISiJIit Ql�lt'1y � °aFa+'Y is prau0 ic Oe r�stss0 b � �.C•l�C2:?OOG a+d tS6-7�Ott i�tanOS�li. � - ----_ _--- ----- - - Fi Gr���`'.;31iy pE51QnB� fo• rtx56�an-Dr1C2�� a,7[diCaLD'K FJ�ce1L it h�r��� dss_harne ene rechsr�e e+ctreme !EITI�Cr17fU'L` f8n7( dec� o� e�a' c•• cyChC Yj��loC8110n! ' -� -iion cycl�c �Re ca�5abdi.^; +S�G C�s � BD9c � ---� ' 0 yea- ilcal Ilie a: ^ _5 ° C ��'� -'S Yeer 'loet ide at ^�°C �5c`ri --� =1�me reWrCan' 1UL f� v^I R';,-A� p.asl:� cESe a^+Q �nvei --/ 3 slea tzrrnir�� sea' des�� fo ens��e leak-ieee o,:_rslion �ema�e �dE Ccass term�nelt p�avae mr,��m��r: Mgt. �e�e perfcrma�cc s� rta ann� :t icli�hteni b', � irzl�ral ��zndl E'15LIfE E36E c` handlm� -� :.�o�•e� z_ �o•.-hazaroo�6 cg•�e i� aFo,,�c see ane a r tra^,s,��^at�:� � �. R�fr M tlrr 11� eoi� P���� nbrr UI MIdIMd wriwt- cw�'i � 0 p v�w nrsirr►a. _ ! r-+!n S�sr-ar� �� 2^°: ,ti� S:sn�a r's �.�*� � E Aouf qp1t1l�' L?�L' 1f� 1 N'ti rtlau'f"- 'L S 8���_!»�;ry 10 hour eapo[t :� 1 B� J P^� •'p ars;-h�uK;' 1'� < a�nC-hou�s Rmt vo�tage ; : 25 •1 �: voRc p�er aN�" 2:7 . �- � wlb, psr c Hl . -----___ __ - - -- >_ —. Gychc Recharqe __ . Q5 V✓C - no Currtn: iMM , _ . _. . . . . _._._ . ..'.__ _._... _ _.__ Shed Mh : - - - -- - - --- - - M1p�da�cr (1 Kl� . ' . m� _� S�ort Crcurt CurreM S O�C Fmcr� -------__-- - - __ _ . ____ --- -- _. Voby� . t: ikNS: t - y- � S� Lv! . Crl�ltsh :l'N's -- M•IphC ` 320 0 mm� _�~- t: 5.� mcnes_ -- W IdtM 125 0 mm 7 L S� incrbs Lrnqth _. S50 C rnm[. ��` mchee t�lhgtt 5"u � kk��artn 't ! -3' : poun.yc ^' � Tlrtn Torqu� 5 U'��� fon�rtwtrr►7 " �'� t.�pounOr �� ��rr�uu s�r .. .. e.o.,.. n:�] n sut:�r l Pn�dncv iAraNGr.�m. ( T-s1 �.on. �tl.tu, ...d �m iir i �'ti. -.ri 1 r.7 , .'k..:f rn-� .�A:�l�, Lfn,,,cS�.<.:rl�e,r-- C � .+na. \r.ai M1 h!'t - t�Mk'r.ta�• �. "�Y4.r. A.r�.� 1���.rur� x t�Q�s�*rn!: �u:+�21'Yru�. �.'.�'.41; �EhM��'. �s.^e� Kr M���i � I �-r.T. �T � f�R+[�Y �lt)!T' [bo�.r., n•��e*wnG M['1� �'� Il.O� Ih'' Il.1P� :'_-YIM�. �.. �r.10� F::-11 : e ,�mp�ns,�v.,srsm. �:]L�t :� sau Mrn�eUa� -:mL�".al:. �'I�f..NS' !+iV : ' (YNUb'i- {�Unc^ 4f �-i 1�1:N1re1 r�l', <• lY%' !L Fi.u.rdun h redirnn � .�. :.i..+e� N.tt-r�r_ -, b, uay[� �t nf:+i-.: l.p� �_3.;;f � �:�h � .. . .... Y�v.ti:.� ;�.�,'0..m i�'?�-r� F.Yrtnhz {'S�.tiu• �.�.11 t�-: ' �.Lv �e � r.� c' t ,e �r� c.. "a�,d rt.��r..�y�,+� :.i an �, .: � w,, Arer.�..;11�.k �L/� - u.:nt ']�..�.c n'r.r��� .VPY�+� �' q ri.4 4 � C�;Tt� ' ��i.� Y+/ 1:y. e ti.1 Tn ' 1' _ �� '�.- z- � t l.�i�mnm U;1�1 'ii:.4'•6 JfJ � - ir��rtm.^.^ 4��tiJ "ti:..��1 +frc.� � � V.]l:^Irl� I.Y V"'nV! I• Ww vJK�I A;�3tit l'� � d.+. C�`�� 0"_ LXtCC:x �::Y' lu'I11C GS. L L�!¢ f�.N�. ('11�'�' [I N-m �� 'n� 1'Ll F.(i 1�..{ Iw I..�e }.;'( 1 A 1�v�� �i+�nr�. �li�[r! 7 \wn� +�w�.w. �+� Hr J=1'i � 1 'J[•.l 1!?� IL .c�... �.:,.n va-i� ��wnd�.r e v .c- �,,__. � ; �:�, - •..,..a..- v.,�� r.: -;M, c:,.ns-.+ � rc-�� � A .. tte I I� . Nr�kh lia�rd ls(orvo�ivs w�>���� A�Iw4�..� ...-..�ui....,....�....�.,, .... �..���a...�',��. .... ,. l':r.�edr.y. �• ,...� �,.��<2cv�.:..i�veG r eaa-n:r ro. �.a A� •.. . [.�t+( wn� ��Y 1 �M'wwrl CM'�wwh.�' �v oA 4� .�r• . �ea �r► irc w� . �.0 : N�•r1v. • ...n� +u �..a� 4a wf.a rm-fw-+ ...�.r*rw� x..mE er �wmur :.awr. ..� drwn' � � o�� ir� ..rv . � � � fir.-� n+,qt rtJ�.NCq 2'vc+tSJS..4acre.+. Lb3+YC S.T?-.""t . , i-. . . _., . . U .. ._ . , I�,. �. _. i AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS (YES1N0} No SPRINKLER DENSfTY N/A TOTAL NUMBER OF BATTERIES 24 �ELECTROLYTE PER BATTERY (GALS) 1.575 SULFURIC ACID CONC�NTRATiON 14°h TOTAL ELECIROLYTE (GALS) 37_8 I � � W I i I � � ��� i �,I � ,� �, z ���i i O R t-� I z � z . U N I L.7 I I � i � I I A � � n c� � wlwi I Z !�i�! i OI �i�l V/� I~ "'� i I � .y W� F I O ip I �i. Q p i� I � L� � J U d W U � O o � O z o � � o o = � � �t -� U Z Z Q � U o C� � U c � _ 0 E • -� Z � � o � Z � e � . � � � � iT) N � � E o O < i < � c � - — - � — V J � �e � e � � � s 0 � L 4 � 2:c. � ` � a 'S� � C: C U Wz�� O�� J 4 z $ J?�� Zu� O a� t� ; : __ ._ _. . . __ � C.) � z � � U °' >m > ry � :� � - c� Q � ^ C � o� tn � Z � �.; O � C Z � w N � r V i � 3�- � c C E'"' � ._..__—____'___—_____...__—...__—_-- _ SJi: CN4008 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF D CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SH=! T TTT�,�: BATTERY SPECS 5�-i_=i NJMBER: F1 Legai Description iHE L�ND REFE4RE0 TO HEaE1N BELOW /5 SlTUAIEp rN 7HE C17Y OF CUPER77N0. COUNTr OF SANrA CL4RA, SrATE OF CAL/FORNIA ANO /5 OESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL ONE.� LOT 24. AS SNOwN CN TNAT CEi?rA/N M.iP fN7]7LeD �7RACT N0. So9t, RaNG40 OE�P CL� UNIT N0. 1' WHIC� MAP WAS f7LFD FCR RECORO /N Ri£ OFAC£ CF THE R£�pADE4 OF 7HE COUN7Y CF SaN7A CLARA, 57A iF CF CAUFORNIA, ON APR1L 22, 19%6 IN BOOK J'0 OF M.1P5, Ar P.tG£5 i1 ANO �i3, As CORREC7ED BY C£RTIFCAT£ GF COARECPCN R£CCROED JUCY !J, 1976 /NSTRU�ENT N0. 53355J8. BOOK C137 OF O�pAL RE_^OROS. PAGc' �H. PaRC£L 7W0• A 570RM DR.i/NAGE E45c',lfEVr AS CONVFYFD IN THA7 CEQTAlN INSiRUMEN7 ENT77LeD EASc.NENr AGR£eMEV'r hiLFp FJR RECORD IN TH£ OF�CE OF 7HE RECOROE7 OF THE COUNTY pF SANrA CLARA, STA7F CF CAUFORNU ON Sc?TENBER 1i. 19i8 IN d00K D 95! OF OFr?C1AL R£COROS AI P,aCE 552. W57AU�vEVT N0. 6�J7?85 ANO OESCR�BfD AS FOCLOwS: AN E.ISc'MEVr 20 F=E� lN VNOTh/ T3+`E CEN7ERLINE OF wh'ICH /5 DESCRl6ED AS FCCLOWS: COMMENClNG A i 7NE SOUTHE7NMOST CCRNER OF LOT N0. f? AS SA/0 lCT /5 5'rICWN ON TNf M.IP OF 7RACT N0. 3993, 'OE ANZA VE.POES". WHICH ,UAP WAS FlLED /N BOCK 197 OF MAPS Ar PAGf 4t, S.1NlA CL.IRA COUN7Y RECOROS. SA/O PO/NT BEfNG ALSO 7HE EASiERNM057 CORNER OF LOT 24 AS 5.7f0 LOr f5 SHONN CN 1HE MAP OF TR.iCT So�(. "RANCHO Of_P CLIF^ UNl r NO. I", WHICH MAP WAS f1L�0 IN BOOK J70 OF MAPS AT PAGES i2 A,VO 43, IN lNE OFF/C£ CF TH£ RECOROER OF SANiA CLARA CCUNTY, $r.iTE OF CALIFORNIA; ]7-'.FiVCf FRCM S.�/O P�1N7 OF BEGlNNfNG ALONG TNf E457E�L Y L/Nf OF SAlD JRAC7 N0. 5091, SOUTH i+' 49' 33" WE57 83.00 FE�7 TO 1NE TRUE POINT OF B£GINNING OF 1HI5 D£SCRIP�ON; TNEVCf FROM 5.110 TRUE POIN7 CF BEGINNING SOUili 00' )0' '6" E.1S7 105 r�cT MGR£ CR Lc55. TO 7Nf LENTERL/N£ OF 57FVEN5 CRf�r(. 3C�N SCE UNf� ^F SAIC ^C FCG' .NCc c�5c.11f.v7 SnAC� c:c�cNC FRCM i;E c.JS�c�?L/ L�Nf CF S.tlO 1RAC7 Sd91 70 7},'£ CEV7ERLINE OF 57EV£NS CR£EK. Assessor's Parcel No. 35d-02-999 Easements O £.45EMf,Vr FOR iNGRE55 d� E��RESS R£CORDED Sc°7EUBfR 25. �915 iN BCOK 7<^99, PdCE 1?7, O.R. (PLOTTED HEREON) O EASEMEvTS AS SHOwt�/ OR DEOICAiED ON SaID JRACr M,�P FOR PU6L.0 SERwC£. PRNAT� ROAD ANO ScWE,R (PLO�D li£REON) O ¢ EASENEV7 FOR PUBUC ROaO AS OEDfC.ilEO CN SAlD TRaCT MAP. (PLOr7EJ HER£CNJ O C. C,4 R"5 WHIC.H /NCLUDES cASEMENIS FCR lNGR£S5. EGRf55 .7N0 U77L177E5 RECORDEil NOVE,NBER !9, l9:6 AS /NST N0. 5+:9219, BOOK C�21. PaG£ Sa1, O.R. (BC�7NKET /N NA lIRE) O ] OOCUMEN7 EN7)iLED "c45c'.NE,vr AGAEc,VENr" RECCRDED SE?TEMBER !1, l97B AS INSr N0. 61J7?85. BOCK 0 95f, PAGE 552. O.R. (P!07TE�7 HER£CN) Access Route lHA7 PORI7CN OF LOTS I AND 24, AS SHONN CN 7HAT CEr7rd/N MAP ENPILED �7RACT N0. So91, RANCHO OEEP CUFF UNIr N0. 7" Nt;ICN MAP WAS f7LED FOR RE�ORO IN 1HE OFF/C£ OF 7NE RfCOR0E4 aF 7NE COUNTY OF S.+NTA CLaRA, 57,� IE OF C.�(lFORN/a, CN APRIL 22. 1976 /N BCOK 3'0 OF MAPS. A7 PAG£5 s2 ANO aJ AS CORREC7ED BY C£R nF7CA 7F CF CORR£C nON RECOROED JUC r I3, 1976 INS7RUMEV r N0. SJ3553B. BOOK C737 OF CFFIpAL RECOROS. PaCE +1. BE7NC A 577fP OF LANO. l2.00 FcE7 tNDE. LnNC 6.00 FEET ON E�CH S/OE OF JHf FOLLOtNNG OESCRIBED C£NJERLINE. CQMMENC/NG �7r THE NORTHWEST CORNfR OF SaID COT 13; 7NENCE 5/4'Jd'79""N, 1I,60 FEET TO IHE POINr OF BEGINNING, M£NC£ S��i'15�07"e. 42.07 �7� THfNCE N43"37'34 c. 57.05 F:_7 T17 A POINr HE�EINAF�4 R�-u7RfD TO AS POINT "A' ANO iHE ENO OF SAIO 57RIP. Lease Area 2Ev"1NNING A,' PCINr '.�' .�5 DESCR�BED .7BOVE: lNf,vCE �vr129'O9�E /8.00 hE=?� 7NfNCE 57530'S1 c, 2700 Fcc7; �ENCE 51�79'09"'N, 18.00 rTC7,� TFifNCE N75'�0'S!'W. T7 00 FEcT 7tJ 7NE POINT OF BEGlNNINC. CONTa�NING 486 SOUARf FE? uORE CR LFSS. Geographic Coordinates at Existing Tower 1983 DAIUM� LA�NDf 37' 18' 38.72"N LONG�7UDf 72T 0�!' 08.d9'W E��VA710N = 456.5 F�=T ABOVE ME�IN 5£A LE'/E! cFR nr�c.� naN: 1HE LAT77UOE AND LONG71UDf SNOWN ABOVE AR£ ACCUR.77�c r0 WITHIN +/- 15 F�Er HORIZONri7LLY AND MAr THf E!=VA710N5 SHONN ABOVE ARf ACCURAI'E TO W171iIN +/- 3�7 VERIICALLY. 7Hf HOR/ZONTAL DAR/M (G£OCAAPHIC COORD�NA?FS) IS /N /FRMS OF 1HE NORIH AMERICAN pANM CF 798J (N.aO BJ) AND IS ExPRESSFJ �N OE�RE_5 (J, MINU7F5 () AND SECONOS ("J, 70 TNf NE:�aE57 HUNOREDTN OF A SECONO. 7HE VERTICAL DAIUM (ELEVA770N5J IS IN 7E,4M5 CF 7}r'£ NORTN AMERICAN VERPCAL DA7UAI OF I9BB (NAVO 98J ANO /5 OETE7M/NED 7'O TNf NEaREST TENTH OF A FOOr � TRILLIUM TELECOM SERVICES 591? BO�SA .4VENUE. SUITE 202 HUN7INGTGN BE:1CH, G4 926a9 C� i � 7"krl CT ��1�1 P��lJ. J �% 1 ' pT 7� � SrrP CUrr ��T�iTrS - J��I;T iyo. 3 Boundary Detail N7SJ03I'w ,SW 12' - - - - - - - - x7s7>Id'Ir' - - - - - - � y - - - - SCAL_. 1'=60' � �a' b' ���See Lease Area Detail � � � v ~ �� i � _ �or 24 , � o�� �or 2 �or 3 -- _ P.S.�.� - I � i� aP.,v �or �2 � � - /� 2 � .zse o.�+ L 0 T 4 ��,i L 0 T 7 L 0 T 8 � A.P.N. 0 ��� -_�_ _� AP.N. � � p N 5 .156-0?-037 A.P.N. ,�ap H p,ig L 0 T 1 J .z56-02-0�T I � J56-0?-035 J56-02-OJ8 AP.AC - � �-a2-o� _ L 0 T 9 - - � $ . . � � RANCHO --- - \ ` - - � A.P.N. L 0 T 10 3ss o2 0+2 � � i � \ � - _ - - - A.P.N. � � y � � _ _� _ � � �- -- - �_ _ J56-02-040 JSfi-02-P41 � / � -�D_EE'P _ _ / ' � �,� L 0 T 24 _ 3 - I ��.� P.S.f.O ` �P.4/VA?c RpAO) � C��= _� � � � , � - ORIV�/ .. �\ LOT 23 Q � --__�_�_ _ � � aP.� LOT 21 � I - _ \ � . � � � ,zs6-os-os4 aPnr. � 5 L O T 18 ' � � L 0 T 13 1 � LO T 22 .�se-o2-as� Z� j AP.N. L O T 17 rRA C T MAP NO 56� 1 AP.N. _ '�'r� AP.AL ' �� I �� -02- ° 49 � AP.N. L 0 r 16 RANCHO DEEP � i I .zss-°z-a++ I al I ,IP.N. CLIFF UNIT N0. 1 LOT 14 I ,zs6-oz-os� L 0 T 2 0 ?� I��'I .z�s-o2-aa .zse o�-o�� �u ! aPN � Q _ M.B. 370/42-43�> � 3ss_a?_as \� ,aPN L 0 T 19 �. ,vo Nu�uea� - � I � .�-oz�1 � i A.P.N. r ��,�,� ��-, i o � a i , �_� - ,r.�� s .� 5 6- 0 2- 0. 5 0 � I M 1 H � N, 7 5 I I � � I � cor �s Basis of Bearings $ � - „8� � - ' � � � I aP.N ,,�, 7HE ST.7 � PLANE COOROINAIF S'IS�M OF /98J (,VAD @3J, C.�UFORNIA ZONE S � ����� � 1 fXC£PT(ON l0 P.S.f. I I � I JS6-OZ-Pl6 3 ���' „ S , W � � ` Q � � �� o Bench Mark � � - - J � ��� - - �sSF TNE CAL/FORN/A SPATIAL REfcRENCf CENTER C.O.R.S "P7?3', � � � �'s" ELEVA770N = 550.12 �r (NAW 98J. Legen� I �I I � \ \ ��/ � �� FS FiNISH SURFACE -rri- WbCO FcNCE -�., $ ,`������ L` LOT \/ �` Date of Surve NG NA'UR.IL GROUNO CH.1lN LINK Fr:VCE Y � POK1R POLE 8 LfGHr $� I� � / �v , � NO�EN@ER 3. ZO]0 /., o RETA/N/NG/BLOCX WALL � fRRICA7)N CON7ROL VACVE q 3 � � •� � O SURVEY CONTROL POINT 1'CP TOP OF 5'RUCTUR£ \ �� / � ` O� �'� CONCR£TE PAVEAIENT a Gc00E77C CCORO�IVq 1E5 \ � eDGE CF va vE•uEN r E�rv c! : � 7R�C P 4Nf! � � 2 ' O 7N£� BFV B�CiC,20W VALVE �d' 1 .r,, N TC 7CP CF CURB :N QVERHANG TOP �t� � --- P,40P�,?�' UNE ��� ELEClRlC ,tifE7EF '� \ / P.S.� PUBL�C ScRNCE fSMT EV ELEC7FIC VAULT SSt. S.1N1iARY SE'.YE4 ESM7 P/ 1'ELCO VAULT ��/i• I.E.f. lNCR£SS & ECRESS ESn�r G�N GAS METER Q �I U� /��� ���� / / / / � / / / / / / � ' �a �� Z Z W Q. 6� N v11 GRAPHIC SCALE 6u 0 .i0 00 FEET ' � ���� � Lease Area Detail � � _ � - SCALE: I"=14' I PO.0 _�i5S5,WG � � � � � � � a62557C � t639.:NG � \L � � 157� _ _ �Jb755'M X � X I t T . X - x _ X _ _ _ �a��ras� �s�as�£ as� � � s�,r�6rca IXISTINGTOWER � °' \�•- - (��i� m roxEr o.e:�c QEOGHAPHIC COOHOINAIES 16J.75NC 159.9JTU5 7SyYC '�� i i56.1AVC ��,r � LAT.= 37'19�38.72"N NAD 83 I � � xG qt LOnIG.= 122'04'08.39"W ( ) I rb'1.� i41.T6 � }� ?�d% � ��°-„I � 460.19N6 : $� Id'r.? CfASf AREI !NC �� I .1/ � • 0 r igRllbN � �`_ SN I �6Zsd7C •+6QSBNG� �R � i / iOMr A• � ' � !� •1S9�M�G N7370'3JY1700" r6a.°tLyl �_.o�N J0.0' � i � - - - � �56. C, 161 i77C . � / �`8JA4G � IC ` �' I '� !� `� / r6 70. JaN� _ I =�.,_ ' ..,.�..� ' � � i5a1AYG ` � _ ` i•t 160.i 4;6.53�5 ' `_;- .,�- _; `..-t.� ��, � !00' - � � �, i � `� _�. -.r I 2 / a. � .. ' � � � _- `'-� � ry 4`6.0� Z I l6279TL �. Q� • r � � / ��'Sl�-�" � � � .. � � �'�' 4 ,",,� � � � ` _ / � 'u .., ;- + _ � -. ` � ; s' .�-. O �� y� / - `- - - � ..�„ .rt . ;,-� .�: J � � �. I ' �?.?QPOSrD Ard�i I?' iMOE , ,� � �' _~�. M '� ���`'� 1 ! �-r a� I NON-F�fCLU9b£ ACCfiS a0U7E `� - �"� k:• :�^-! y '"`'tt 'i = v I �. � �\ � i ? r��l / � � ��` �"�-� `' � ' F 4,'�' ` I � � �� , \ ' ' -. �:''�� - � I 9bl.IA1C _ - `.._.' .� 1�f757CA � �_� �h+�� I aae � � �ss �� -;< "�� LOT 1 ��_�* I f!) I � / ,; ,.. A.P.N. .Z56-02-032 �s �,� I / W � � � � I5H.9M�G w .twF 'f"ia � �"� „ � � � ,�,. , ElPSANC BUllDINC ` i � `� ' I + � � , e, � ; - I�, _ , _ �^ r �,* 1 � \ '�+L � � . r -�: _ ^ �� T I � � \\ \ O � � � _ _ `�`^ ; I � I \ t', � \ .� ` _... '. � ' Yr w � \ \ 0�' � � �� �� -�!(�_ �" ` � ,_ ^i-�'L, �+1 . �s I � I ` \ 16X911C ,� / / ` � 1 '•'�`,"' s 7 I � � �(iIT � ti ,� � t'.:; I � b � � C.� 16778TOP � _ ] �:y-;�`- I $ � � � �� a59.d5NG il � .'� l � � N } � T �� �i \ `� A � � . ' {=;F / e� � I / 9.09fS ' -�,'` _ I u I � I � 7� - - `'T;, � � I I -7�C`. � i57 a6fJ. A ., -,-. - . �,~ l �� � �7O i60�5� � � � ,^:^� i I � I 76S/6iC / O� � �,'�l � � ?�c,�.` �.�. F,O dz5vc -:, ( ��%�. J6d65i0P LL I I I � �60.98F5 '� '�+`� -., ��. � i \ �� � �.Q� \ _ � . �� ',` ` / i6<.o! j I � y � \ � \ �� x58.IB1C \ _ � _ _ � ' ..�. rr� , ' � _ � / r / F' / \ � �� � � 1 1 � .��.9us � � � ssh� � J /�. 1QC0-Rl<',FR ' � \ \ ����, � �/��� � \ � � �� \ � �� � � \ \ \ \ � PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INfORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RElATES TO ATBcT M081LITY IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. COMSU�TANT ��L V��� SUAVEYINC3, INC. 411 Janb Clr.. Su� 20.5, Cuona, CA 92BB0 PMic %1-7db99m Fac %1.2l�gTy � ' �6GLVAOA rw.aN�damm ���sD. 0 4 '�i JOBNO. t0l3E , � . �. r � �� f * LS. T780 * � E�.11�1-11 7� PREPARED.FOR at&t 4430 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROV,4�5 R.F. DATE SAC AND ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE Ar�r crn oare OWNER APPROVA� DAiE PROJECT NAME RANCHO DEEP CLIFF PROJECT NUMBER CNU4008 22475 RANCFIO �EEP CUFF CUPEr�TINO, CA 95014 SANTA CL4RA COUNIY DATE DESCRIPTION BY 11/10/10 SUBMRTA� HN 4/1/11 TRLE REPORT / FlNAL RAS SHEET TITLE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY C-1 SHEEi 1 OF 1 Title Report PR EP.a R E O Br� F� p E? l T'/ N an C N a L 1 7 7 L E C O M P. a N Y OROER NO.: 57057/76 OaTEO� DECEMBER 9. 20i0 i � \ ` � `�� � � � \ \ � / � \ \ � � � ' � �� � �, , � \ \� � � / T \� � / / \� � / / � � � / \ ' I I I �` � / � ���� � � � / � �� � � ` � / � � / 0 ` � ` � / � `�� � � �Q � / � / / I ` � (E) TOWER TO BE RE�+IOVED , / BY VERIZON / / � � � / (� cuu wau � (N) TOWER pRpppgm ATkT EQU�'MfNT LE/�SE (E) VEHICLE 7URNAROUND ` I� � � � � � � X ►� I •� - �• � _ � �'�\����� � � l 'i - i_ � � �\ _• � / 1 7 _ _' �,_ _ . � � 1 q - . . - � `� • • A2 (� v�¢ora �ouiPMExr �o�no� � � _ -, � � - . - �-t �` I , ' • x \` ' ` � ^ rl•,, .. , ` � / - � I � ' � �/ '\�� / \\� � 1 `� I ; � `. � / 3 ,.�. � :�� n I . �� \\r , �� ` (E) STREET UGHT l � � // ,o' �`� ': � �;��.`.'``c'�, ` v^ \ � � I °'.:/� �RE3WN (TYP. � � �T�•� � / / ' `M,. ``�w``'-� � � OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT � � / � �-_ / / �;. ���, � AREq) � � .� �� � ' - '�i. �.' . � ♦� __� �\ "�;"�',+,�,'�,�,� ,.. (E) RESIDENIIAL . � ^� �� ` � ` r � ��� �'�:�; / ` � � _ • \ "�' ,.''.. � ` ` ` / ` ' =, -�'��'; F' " / _ _ � ` _ ` �• ��'_.• r' // � _ / � � _' - • • / / ���' o .- < . i i � , / � � f � \ \ *'''-���.,'��,`:�� ,� -.= /� � \ � - \ � � ''+�'�,;,�*,`'�•, � 1 � / � \ � � �� / � � � �� / � � � / / � \ � � � v � (E) RESIDENTIAL � � �� , , , � , \ �-_ / (E� DRIVEWAY \ � � / � � / � � / � � / / \ ��� — — \ � i � / (E} RESIDEN�IAL � � / � � / \�, \ \ � � � � � \ � � ��_ � � (E) RESIDEN7IAL (E) RESIDENIIA\ \ � \ � \ \ � � � \ � / � \ \ _ � � � / � \ — � / � _ ` � i \ � \\� \ / {E) RESIDENl1AL r--� \ (E) PROPERTY LJNE � \ \ / / I (IYP.) / � / I � /� I ♦ / � � � \ � � i � � ` � � � \ � � � \ / � � \ v � / \ � (E) RE5IDENTIAI \ � � � � (E) RESIDENTIAL \ _ � � / i � z ° ��� 'I � � � z �� a z z � U N N � w Q ww � QA z �� o �� , y �� W 6 °p � A o lo � � J U W U � O o z o � � o o = � � � � p U w Z O U � U � O z � E ' � a Z U Z � . y o � Q a. in Di � � tl � � � ° � < < < � 8 � e j °' J � � �� a b � w O � o�; _� e d0o�ti O��° ��b J 2 4 n = U O n � a V � �' ti � .. .._._ . ............... ... . ^.._.... _....._.................. � U � z vi U � �' � � � �� cc � � a ��� � 3Z � �O �,,] C Z �� � ° n w ' ' 3 Qa ¢ SEA: CN4008 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF D CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SHEET iTft.E: SITE PLAN SHEEf NUMBER: A1 _;```� �_ � ' /��� -" / �� _ --, - � � � _ • ` � I I I �' __ I ' �. / �N) ��� � � TOWER LEASE - \ , AREA BY VERIZON ' .;., i '. � �.� L (E) CMU WALL � ENLARGED SITE PLAN S�A�: ,,4- _ ,•-a- � � � 0 0 /�� / / / \ � �—!-� ! \�/�� � 1 / ' �.; /r . - _ `\-- /i r i �-'- _� A _ -- �� A � p _�—'- �� (N) VERIZON EOUIP�IENT �` �� A _ _ — — — — — _ -. � LEASE AREA / ' ' ' ' � — — ' - r 1 h ��� I '' ,.. , NEW ATdcT ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON (E) 70' MONOPINE, SEE DETAIL 2/A2 � (E) FENCE +r, � ��_�x NEW TA dcT RRU'� MOUNTED TO - x `k rowER � \ , \ �x ! ` `-� ` PROPOSm (2) GPS MRENWIS (MIN. l�-. � ` � k \ 10' SEPARATION) �- X ' � J � ` P x`x � U � X - � - � -- - � � `\ 'q � q � - -'� ,,. � - ' \ - ` ` / � _ . NEW WALL BY \� � E TOWER — � � VEWZON � A _ ' � ( � TO BE � I \ q - REMOVED � � _ / � BY VERIZON A _ � � � A --• .._ p � ATdcT TREE REMOVAL SCHEDULE iYPE OWAETER OTY REYOVFD � '- �IONTEREY PINE 25.5'4 1 (E) TREE TO BE REUOVED PROPOSED ATdcT OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS (8 TOTAL) �r_ x x � ��N UNK , � �'+�� � � , k � X �0� � �X A —��� • ` ` ` X � • � 1 � --- - . ..� � . , ��_—_� �� /� PROVIDE DARK GREEN VINYL SlATS TO (E) FENCE FOR SCREENING �k� ^� � X � ` � k � �` k ` PROPOSED UNOERGROUND �- , � \�°� — �� � `�/ ar � � — � � ' ' ' _ ANTENNA COAX ' � `� ` \ � — — — � / -- - / , i � � corvouiTS � ` ^ � � � � — — — i i � �i ���\ ,�,��' '� �i �— �� � �' / \\ / � _.; x �� i ��. � � - _ ' ' i / � � � / �� . / / � - x � �/ \ \ � � // � � � (E) TREE 1 NE'M CANC. EQUIPMENT � � / �� � � / � � � TO REMAIN \ SIAB ON GRADE � , � � �� - � - � l'ii' / � �� � i / `� / / � /� (� BLDG. • OVERHANG / / , /� _� �� � J /// `` .. % . �� � _- / � ; � � / � •��`: , �� � � ,� e ,/ � � // .��/ .�` . / i // / ` . .\\ � - � -- �� � PROPOSFD UNOER�ROUND � POWER ANO TELCO CONDUfTS (VERIFY WRH VFrtRON ON � \ INSTALU110N LOCAiION MID � ROUTE THROUGH VERQON LFASE AREA) �� / \ � � �\ � . � i � . (E) BLDG. � � \ �� - _ OVERNANG � � � \ �� ? � \ � � m ` �. � ; , � `_ . _,l` \ �- _- _ \ . � � - �, � . " �� � NEW ATdeT 7' HIGH REDW000 . � � -- - � � '.. _� CE EN LOSURE � FEN C , ; � ,, �. � _ \\ . , � (E) TREE � . � _ � � - _ n TO REMAIN � � � - . �\, � �\ �c � _ `'' � � _, _ .. ' ;. ` - �\''�.. � �\ ;�.� � ,�.: �- ., - � . .. . � � � .�� ,• � -� - �;, ,_ - � . . . . � \\ \� � _. , .� .. . / _; , , � � � ` \ _ �; - � , � , . ,. ; � v ��\\ --� - 1 \,� , . ^ ._,. ", _ .... �\ _a � , � .� � _ � " -' �� ? , �' , . , '_ � � : ,� , : .Y : _ .:.� , . _ _. _ .. . �• • . � � � � \ � . ' '• \ \` - �,_� f _ . � �' . . .�� .. . . .. \\ �:. ` � �_•� . . . . . . � . � ��.,. , � . , � � . -_. "� . . _ . . . . \ \ ., _ . , '� � ,_ � .,-.- •.... . , .. \ � � _ T , . _,,, ;,, _ _ � � , , , „ , , ., .,. . ,_ . . -. , , :-._ � .. �.�,., , ; . ,. _..� \ � � , 2a� a � � � �� � p v�i v� a �� a o 0 V N N � W A � w � Z � � � � � � •~ •-� W E � � � Q � O � � J U W U � � O � � V U O z o � � o � V � � � � Z U � U � O z � � • � Z p Y Z � � � � Q o 0 c. h �3 j :, :� « ' s o �� < < < � S � s � Q J �� � �� �i ^ 0��� ���, c� : =�xe ��o� W x e � c��° � � x � i � W�$� O � �' �i � : . ......... ... . ..... . ....... . .........._ . ._ ry...._.. ....... .._ ... ....... � C.1 � Z_ U �- °° � �� > C � � c� a � /���( �� VI O 3Z w � v; O �] O Z �a � oa � ' nw 3 �� � P � C� Q s�u: CN4008 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIF'F D CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SN�T i1TLE: ENLARGED SITE P LAN SH�T NUMBER: A2 ° N01E: Q d TREE BRANCHES REMOVED FOR CLARI7Y o j NOTE: y � DIMEh'SIONS ARE TYPICAL FOR Af1 THREE SECTORS iy'_0• 4 � -0 ' (11'P.� � � � � � NEW ATdcT ANTENNA MOUNT (N) 70' MONOPINE , � � \ � � NEW TW�A'S (BY VER120N) / / (TYp, 4 PER SECTOR) APPROX 13.5' BRANCH � �� DIAMETER AT ANTENNAS �� � POS. 4 (VERIFY W/ POLE MANUF.) cr � (n'p,) PROPOSED DC SURGE � PROTECTOR (TYP. OF 2) I I NEW RRU'S (TYP. 2) I AT EACH LTE ANTENNA � I NEW ATdcT LTE ANTENNA (TYP.) SEE DETAIL 1 /A4 NEW ATdcT GSM B50/1900 ANTENNA (TYP.) SEE DETAIL 1/A4 NEW ATdcT UMTS J ' 650/1900 ANTENNA (TYP.) SEE DETAIL 1/A4 NEW ATdcT UMTS o B50/1900 ANTENNA (TYP.) '� �," SEE DETAIL 1 /A4 � ����� � ��MU� C' ° l�p. NOTE: PROJIDE PINE N�IE SDCKS TO ALL ANIFNNIS TO AU7CH (N) PINE 1REE N�L6 z ANTENNA LAYOUT S�A�: 3 8• _,•-o- l� �k �� k � ` X � k �\ X� k p ��r �,� , _ X � �oPOSEn uno�xc�ourw — , ANTENNA CQU( CONDU(i5 PROPOSED GPS ANTFNNA � PROPOSm UNDERGROUND POWER AND Tt1C0 CONDUfiS p� � A A �� A = A_ ___ —���_``_ -.� . _a ---- PROP05FD MITENNA CDAX CANDUR STUB UP (� TowE� , � - TO BE R�AO'JED � � � Bf VERfZON ���---,� , _. --- - . � � .. NEW UTILJTY H-FRIWE � -- �.. � �--�� PROPOSED CPS _ ANTENNA x � � � � �� �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� � � � � � �\ � I � 1 \ NEW ACCESS \ GA1E \ PRWIDE NEW GRFFTI SLA15 IN (E� FENCE FOR SCRFEMING PROPOSFD ATRT EOUIPIaEEPffT G4BINETS (8 TOTAL) � � ---�� �� i �� � i --- / � / / /._ i� � � ._ � \ ' �� � " NEW ATdcT 7' HIGH REDWOOD _..�" ` _ � � � � ` FENCE ENCLOSURE " � �_:;� � � - T� .:: -`� . _ � ' � � � EQUIPMENT LAYOUT P `� �"'� FOR CABINET IANNTEW�NCE SCALE 3 8' = 1'-0' � 240' 120' POS. 3 �T�•) �j O .r � � � z �� o �� � �� V � o � W O O A �„ �., t/� Ca c Z �a O �� — � �� �� w � °� � A o� � � � J U d W U `� � O O � N U U � O � � � � � p U w Z O U � U U O � � . � Z p o = � � 3 � � Q � in � � � e �s .i+ ' s ° < c < � S � � J q J �� d��� � O�ti� ���: Z e tlC`U�U 111v:� � � k o j i � R W°o� _ �: V M� : _..._.. _ _ -_ _ _ _... � __. - _ _.._.__... � U � z � U �� � � cm Q � CU � o 3Z � N o � cZ � � ca � a� � � aa E- Q SFA: ---- CN4008 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF D CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SH�f TTRE: EQUIPMENT AND NTENNA LAYOUT SH�R NUMBER: A2 .1 70'—Q�t A.G.L TOP OF N AIONOPINE 8Y VERIZON (N) VERIZON xyE 70'-0't A.G.L TOP OF N MONOPINE 8Y VERIZON (N) VERIZON : 0 w � � �� � y '��dF � � X . x"F 7� '' r��� # �' 'li.�^� ���� �, �� f� � 'k 7.."• 'h. �� '�.� "1 �.��,,.�.,�,� i!k ' 1 �. -� ,�t f�K t. ��'►� � 4' � � X �' 62'-0't A.G.L #. RAD CENTER OF N VERIZON ANTENNAS � 52'-0't A.G.L RAD CENTER OF NEW AT&T ANIENNAS ''` t=�`. ` NEW ATdcT ANTENNAS ' . �, (12 TOTAL, 3 PER SECTOR) � � �_ SEE DETAlL 1/A4 _ ��, * .'� NOTE: '3l� K. PROMDE PINE N�LE 50CKS TO ALL "��� ��: ANTENNAS TO MATCH (N) PINE TREE N�LES � �"- ,� �,?� } {: .������� h . . ,�}� � �,,� �N) 70'-0" MONOPINE BY VERIZON �� . ���� }� . �-���# . �' T_. f . ._ "�, � `�. ,�� . �*�: �'• . _� �.:.� �� * �_ � �-��� � �`�, i -- '� X 'K `h �i'. i 0"-0" DATUM 2 EAST ELEVATION S�A�: , e•_,•—a- A3 (E) CHAIN UNK � 62�-0't A.G.L RAD CENTER OF N VERIZON AN7ENNAS *. M: * d 1� ,. o '�' 52'-0"t A.G.L � 8 ,.; RAD CENTER OF NEW ATdcT ANTENNAS ��:� �.. �. .�� ,- x�` �t � NEW ATdcT ANTENNAS NOTE: � � x �� �,�t i �: . R � 1 �� � ** � 4 � *�� �- ��� i � t ��� 1 t � ��}� ���� � '� '� *'�! � �' .� i fi# - ��� :- '0.' �!' .� . . , c' _ h i l l r � �'.�.... . . . 1 _�i �" (12 TOTAL, 3 PER SECTOR) PROVIOE PiNE N�IE SOCKS TO ALL }�' SEE DETAIL 1/A4 ANTENNPS TO MATCH (N) PINE TREE NEIDLES ��> r: > � "` � � � �:. *�� �� �: ��' � : ic * � .., .'' lr+ ; '" � 1 � ,�;, Y` ����''� �(N) 70'-0' MONOPINE BY VERIZON . ����`it� �:� �,,;� ,� ��! '�c T ` # ['�+�`'� �; . ►,►:� , ►r - f � ��, �' * EW ATdcT OUTDOOR EOUIPMENT ��.*- CA8INET MOUNTED TO A NEW _y�� �* ,� � ,� CONC. SIAB .,?�� �` �# BOTTOM BRANCH OF I ,. �. X � 10'-0't A.G.L. / —U 2 A.b.L TOP OF NEW ATdcT FENCE _._ . - r-_^ r= �-= 0'-0' DATUM NEW ATdcT 7'-0' HIGH REDVY000 FENCE ENCLOSURE � SOUTHWEST ELEVATION S�A�: , 8-_,�—a- A3 W O .-+ � I � � z �� o y� �. E c7 c7 V L O o i �7 � W O O A �„ �, � Z � � � � � � .'-'-, „�.., \ W � �° � A a o � � J U � W U � � O O Z o \ � p o = � � � � U Z U � U U O d � : � � � Z � � 0 3 a t�s �s � o Q �..� < < < � � � 0 b � Q � ! � G.I � O � � O ���� ���a =,x a M O y 4 a. O�a� ���� i � 4 W $ o � Z 3 � O a` V � : _. _._ �.__. _ __ __ __ __ � U � Z U � ° � ] 9 > �� � cm Q c (�/) C U � 3 Z �- o � �� c � � o¢ ' � r� w � p J � � 2 F Q 5'cAL• CN4008 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF D CUPERTINO, CA 95014 sr+E-� mt�: ELEVATIONS SHE:"T NUMBE�: A3 ANTENNA SPECIF1CATlONS MANUFACTURER: ANDREW MODEL: DBXNH-65fi56-R2M � s o DIMENSIONS: 7.1' x 73.4' x 11.9' NOTE: ANTENNA INFORMATION PER RF�S DAlED 2-7-2011 REV. V1.0 � � i � 8� oPnoN�u BACKUP 3'-0�" �� .O.O.O�O� .Q�.�,�. ,� �,�,�, RIGHT SIDE VIEW s ERICSSON CABINET DETAILS S�A�: ,•=,�-o• A4 ii� . � � m PLAN VIEW HANDLE � � n � I FRONT VIEW 51DE VIEW 11.9' 7.1" � � ANTENNA DETA{L SCALE: ,, z•=,�-o- A4 � 6.1' _� W - ERICSSON qtY 172 BB/4 a ERICSSON RRU DETAIL SCALE: ,•�,�-o- A4 z TMA DETAIL 5�,�: ,� z-=,�-o- A4 W o .-, a � � I z �� o � � � � c� � �� q o 0 c�. r=, � � c Z � � � � � � •� •., ��r. W d �� � A � O � � J U � W U � O O Z o � d p o = � °� - ' U Z Z Q � U O U � U e � � � Z � e z � �e s � d a 1 Kf r/7 � � � � � ' � O < < < � C � O C V A � e � U � O��'�° � � � tlw�� e ���� h � O�en � b Jo�^ = u � fi = i O �� C� h : ti __......_....._..........._.._.. -_ __.......---....- ....__ _ .____...__ _ _.. � U � z � U � �' � �� � c� � � a ��� � � 3Z � OZ � W N � ° n w f � 3 aa E�- Q sEa�: CN4008 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF D CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SHEE7 TiTLE; D ETAI LS SH:ET NUMBER: A4 FRONT VIEW RF SIGNAGE GENERAL NOTES: s, SIGNS TO BE POSTED IN AREAS AS INDICATED aN AT SITE PER ATdeT SIGN SPECIFlCATIONS STANDARDS, SECTiON 9.0 - SIGNAGE AND BARRIERS. CONTACT ERICSSON FOR COPY OF SPECIFlCATION. 2, SIGNS A�UST BE POSTED AT A CONSPICUOUS POINT, BE READILY VfSIBLE AND MAKc THE READER AWARE Of THE POTENTIAL RISKS PR10R TO ENTERING THE AfFECTED AREAS. 3, CON7RACTOR TO APPLY CORRES?ONDING SITE NUMBER TO SIGNAGE AS REQUIRED. 4, CON7RACTOR TO APPLY ATdcT CONTACT INFORMAnON TO SIGNAGE AS REQUIRED, PER THE DIREC110N OF 1}iE S ATdcT CONST'�i UCT10N MANAGER. -i- �, CONTRACTOR TO MaUNT SIGN 1.6 ON THE REAR Of ALL ANTENNAS, WHICHEVER LOCATiON IS MORE VISIBLE. A 6, BACKGROUND USE .032 ALUMINUM WITH BAKED ENAMEL FlNISH, APPLY UV PROTEC1lVE COATING OVER THE Y fACE OF THE SIGN, BACKGROUND AND OPPOSITE (BIANK) FACE OF THE SIGN TO BE WHI7E. �_ BACKGROUND USE NON METALLIC PRESSURE SE4S171VE VINYL LABEL WITH ADHESIVE BACKING, APPLY UV B PROTECTIVE COATING OVER THE FACE OF THE LABEL. g, DRILL (4) 3/16' MOUNIING HOlES IN EACH CORNER. A C K 3 F E SCALE: SCAL�: ^ E NOT USED y T; $ RF NOTES N.T.S 3 T F ^ � ;�! F�,) I� 1�� �� "i�f � )� � ; _. R P�op�rty of AT&T ______� __y __ _-__.� -:__ i o 1. , , ,_:,�� o� M �=st i(���t i1t1s fR1:. h, L�L 172 if_'a: :.i[ W:z�j ll;�: � � } � � r � � � � Cautil � au �cn 39 � +!c x�c�ia � ?a_7w� �cxiu�s :luxt itwi � 'c_ A � i +mm �f� aalc-r•3t r� r f � ( n c,�� �, ta r � _. - --- - ---- — -�''x � c+�+. � T � � 1 S LJ � � 1' � � 1 i ��l ��s;:�ax � ,ep�, Q n�� r �,� E P.ttti lYC � N� Tr�spassing C��u itle nauitT�fin! aAiie 1 Uttf �eut ��.� ro:Jtr � ro�tnl ��f tiL ± N vi�taters �i�, b� P;os�L�te� ------------ -___�—___ N 1�`��{.3�di�it'��.'�C�?� -.__ A .Y S�Gr. s AT3T �{7 (',.7j'r' P_.' C(T?_, _if }ifl�,�i :_ r- �- 7 ?.::. :ilsaP-r Figurel3:fNFORMATIONSign4 r�ainter�ance on this �ite. calt � a �:�: � -_. .: _ � .- .-,�--� _. . �, , �. ..,:_ ��.. ��,r:. 0l�1.tr l�S .� :i`t " -�fnrF�C2 C=if 5jtn rt4;�„r.�f �.�rw�a�q�cvca�n:l�.u�rnlmapR+T�4't,-"7M11�ktxs��,-n���e��: cr�hay r u+ye�rar Ac iue��. 't � pr »� ��, sr+++ti h ^x Cwuu�p�cx v� 11 d t � Jr �,�d� �_ � ' ' �:�,{�ar ��ro 6 rr�.s Iw^+�cf .� ! �, ��.i4 3r �4Th ! �� 1 : E�3 ;� lt �L�cttm h�['amcw .�� ± +t - ` C : Jklf( 3.'fh17116s1C ` 7#L k{.�.�'l�`.�� � J .l�Yf�2.�.�y l�i'� �l�i:f� :i .'l�.l - ru�crL� e zomparrta u .-x�a:nn :rn ;a�.�'yic SCAL�: SCA�=: SCALE: SCAL=: NOT USED 9 AT&T SIGNAGE � s INFORMATION SIGN N.i.S 4 ANTENNA SIGNAGE NT 'I N.T.� � CFC CHAP I ER 6 COMPUANCE TCTAI ELEC7RCLYTE _ 12 EATiCRIES X 2.17 GAL/BATiERY = 2fi.04 GAL I a._' �.•.'C.•�.,•�.'-: etw X sr�T��h (SINCE <�0 GAL Qf ELCTROLYTE, � CFC CHAPT�3 6, SECt10N 608 N0T � � I APPUCABLE) _.�r�l � Gb� sS� r� � �'•s �,i�� BATTERY INFORMATION �T'E+�E�=�'ac� i'OiAL � OF I ELCTRCLI?E ELECTROLY'E I� SUI.°LRIC ACID VOLUME/UNIT -°E �� �� ¢ �� 1 EaTTERY MCOEL BAii UNITd j AC�D 8Y= ELECTnOLYiE vy t�rR vGWME(GAL. YIEIGKf (LHS.)- VOLUME VOIUME PE7 UNIT I INSTA�L=D p q NIT � P�� NIT I MPRATHCPI � M12Vt 55FT ; �^� xr Q.,t�x a�yi.;E� ;:f 7 �, �-R:' BY EXIDE I I ' 2 2.' 7;,a,L 23.8 L95. i 30�=a.�5 Ga�L./Z. t 7 GaL �:� ��-��' �-s�o-8�2-04�, � � Beyood T his Poi�t you are ���:_��a- y�� � �,.o» as�e t�m.�+s R*� ta ca�.�.^sl �`t� � �i �,R�� ror,�� ,ac�o wE�cr+r � suiPhu = T E�crRO�� x SULPH a�� Aero� X entering an area where radio ,,..�.� �:�-� ��a�e+ v� i�+� �s WEIGNT G AL Ei.ECTRO� E vCWME (GAL) VO�UME/UNRS WEIGFfi (L85.) WEIGHT/UN(T �� WE��H� freqliency emissions mcn• c�-reed z5.o4 �,�. =,2 �NRS X�.�7 12p L3S. - �z �NRS x,o the FCC C�neral Po ulation �'�� 42x=10 LBS./23.8 LBS. � ���NR �35_ � ' � Exposure Limits. _ __ Fo�low all posteci sisns and site �ui�elines ti�r µ•orkin_� in a radio fr�qu�ncy �m irunrr�nt !r�r F�� l,c:F� i t�r»�n� �rxr SCALE: SCALF; SCALt: SCAL: : NOT USED N.r.s 7 O BATTERY NOTES N.T.S 7 RF WARNING SIGNAGE N.r.s r 'j INFORMATION SIGN N.r.; 2 > w x � � � � � a a� o � �� E� �7 c'� p., z � � U N I N � � o O A � � Z � I � 0 � � � �I� ` � \\ W � O N q \�\ �.L � � � � � � U W U � o O 00 U � o z o � � o o = � O� �`' -' U Z U � U U O U � C U ' Z w 0 o d � W n tn E ~ - � � � < < � S __ __ . _ �� � � J y ,: i d�zT � :V i � =2�� C� � j:u U .'� ` � J y ;c W?e'' Q � a O J=i� Z°c� o �' �n . . _ . ..... .. .' _ .. __ . .. .. .. .__ . � U � � x � > ^- n � P � � Q , (f O :J � 3� U N� �] O Z � Q Ut O < _ "7 W � - J � � � 2 L�� � � CN4008 RANCHO DEEP CLIFF 22475 RANCHO DEEP CLLFF D CUPERTINO, CA 95014 sr��r -rr� EMERGENCY/ RF SIGNAGE � A5 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY HALL 10300 TOPPE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 9501�-3255 C�J p E RT �� 0 (�08) 777-3308 • FAX (408) 777-3333 •��lannin�@cu��ertino.or� Subject: Report of the Community Development Director Plannulg Coiiunission Agenda Date: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 The City Council met on October 18, 2011 and discussed the following item(s) of interest to the Planning Commission: 1. Home of Christ Church Developnient Proposal - Citv Council approved the Use Perniit, Exception, and the adoption of the Negative Declaration and Resolution to revise the General Plan Land Use for 10340 Bubb Road from Quasi-Public/ Institutional to Industrial / Residential / Commercial; conducted the first reading of Ordinance No. 11-2083 to repeal the old ML-rc ordinance and ainend Chapter 19.60 (Light Industrial (ML) Zones) of the Cupertino Municipal Code, related to the codification of the ML-rc (West Valley Light Industrial) Zoning regulations; conducted first reading of Ordinance No. 11-2084 to change the zoiung for the same site from BQ to ML-rc. 2. Development Perinit Process - City Council conducted the first reading of Ordinance No. 11- 2085 and adopted Resolution No. 11-182 Upcoming Dates: Oct 28 Cinema in the S1ladows, 6pm, Memorial Park Amphitheater Nov 10-12 T11e Vietrlam Wall, Dayligllt -10pn1, Meinorial Park Nov 11 Veterans Day Celebration,llam, Menlorial Park Dec 2 Community Tree Lighting, 6-7pm, Quinlan Cominunity Center Dec 3 Breakfast with Santa, 8-10am, Quinlan Coinmuiuty Center Enclosures: News Articles G: � Planning�:gc�rtiS�Director'nR���»�t�pd10-2�-IZ.c�oc 167 Page 1 of 1 MercuryNews.cam �Y O 1 111 The roughly 15-acre project site is located at 20580, 20630 and 20680 Homestead Road on the Q 1SS10 S � southwest corner of Homestead Road and N. De Anza Boulevard. The T.J. Maxx store currently on CO �t� $ S�OY` site is slated to move to The Crossroads shopping center and will share the former Mervyn's building O �5�� r.� with HomeGoods. The planning commission's decision also allows developers to change the architecture. The original �y �att �/ilson approved center had a Spanish and mission mwilson@community-newspapers.com architectural theme; however, the change will now reflect a more modern Mediterranean-style typical of Posted: 10/14/2091 0222:46 PM PDT other shopping centers and consistent with Updated: 10/14/2011 02:37:34 PM PDT Safeway's recent new store protocols, according to city planner Gary Chao. A Safeway store could soon be on its way to The site is home to the former PW Market, which Homestead Road in Cupertino as part of an overhaul closed in August 2010 along with all its other of the Homestead Square Shopping Center, chains. The chain began in the early 1940s with a according to developers at a recent planning single store called Joey Franco's PW Market, named commission public hearing. after its founder Joey Franco, who passed away in The Sobrato Organization on Tuesday received the early 2000s. The city's new nearby park is unanimous appro�al from the Cupertino Planning named in Franco's honor. Commission to make changes to an ambitious overhaul of the shopping center to help make way for the grocery store. The new construction plans allow for more parking spaces and the addition of new decorative paving materials along the two main entrance driveways as well as the rear shopping center driveway. 5afeway will anchor the middle of the shopping center, with a Michaels arts and crafts store sitting nearby, according to site plans delivered to the city. Last year developers pitched a plan to the Cupertino ���tthis website is being blocked by the City Council that will see the center get its first makeover in 40 years. In May 2Q10, the council IT Dept because the site my contain harmful appro�ed the demolition of approximately 95,666 adware/spyware. Please contact the IT square feet of existing commercial space and the Manager, 777-3189, if you require access to construction of 146,458 square feet of new his website for city business. commercial space, consisting of four new buildings and three new spaces for tenants. The approval also allowed for a 24-hour drive-through pharmacy at a Rite Aid Pharmacy and a second drive-through at one of the satellite buildings. The Sobrato Organization acquired the center last November. Rite Aid recently submitted documents for building permits and construction is anticipated to begin shortly, �nr�nrrlinn fn 7 ri#�i e#�ff ronnrF Print f'csw�r�d By £�: E ,� � r�f_� E��rr��.��°���i�~� °:. http://www.mercurynews.com/fdcp?unique=131 �8R46434�7 � 68 10/17/2011 Page 1 of 2 MercuryNews.com � �,����„ �� i seeing support ertl o: �������,� ��� � for the project instead of the usual opposition. �� � ��.� �.�t��� �.� "Anytime a cell tower application comes up, we always get a room full of people, but most of the �� �� time they are all opposed to it. This is a refreshing difference," commissioner Marty Miller told the crowd of seniors. �y �latt Wilson The tower will sit 422 feet from the nearest mwil�on@community-newspapers.com residence. The wireless facility will share the hill with five satellite dishes already owned by the c Posted: 10/13/�011 08:03:13 PM PDT ommunity. The wireless facility is not expected to Updated: 10/13/2011 08:03:14 PM PDT interfere with the television satellite dishes, as they operate at different frequency ranges, according to a Better cell phone coverage is coming to a Cupertino city staff report. retirement community. The facility will be located on a small hill The Cupertino Planning Commission on Sept. 27 overlooking the building, which is near Highway unanimously and quickly approved a use permit to 28a and not far from neighboring city Los Altos and allow AT&T to install a personal wireless service its single-family residences, and the fake eucalyptus facility near The Forum at Rancho San Antonio design will help the tower blend into the foliage retirement community. The community is on Cristo already on the hill. A row of existing tall eucalyptus Rey Drive near Rancho San Antonio County Park. trees between the project site and Highway 280 will screen the wireless facility from highway motorists The permit allows the installation of a facility and Los Altos residents, according to city staff. consisting of 12 panel antennas mounted at a Five other potential cell sites in the vicinity of the height of 55 feet. The facility will look like a fake project site were considered, including a California eucalyptus tree. Water Service tank on Cristo Rey Drive and another The facility comes at the request of managemenf and �n Los Altos, the nearby Maryknoll Seminary, Rancho residents, who believe the current lack of wireless San Antonio County Park and Gate of Heaven phone coverage presents a genuine public safety Cemetery. concern for community residents, according to city City staff said that the surroundings have a staff. "We have uery spotty coverage and for us, this cell �`���tthis website is being blocked by the tower will make not only a convenience but add IT Dept because the site my contain harmful tremendous safety coverage for us," said Mary adware/spyware. Please contact the IT Elizabeth 0'Connor, vice president of the facility's anager, 777�3189 if you �'equlre access to board. his website for city business. AT&T representative Alex Morin told the planning commission that the wireless facility is a response to overwhelming public demand. The city also received numerous comments from the public supporting the project and better wireless communication couerage in generaL The swift decision by the planning commission was met with loud applause from a small group of residents who attended the 16-minute commission , mcc#inn Cnmc r�l�nninn rnmrniccinnorc anr+rnri�4cr! �' Print Pawered E3Y �._.� I ��i� i�` C��r���°���� .� ', http://www.mercurynews.com/fdcp?unique=131��84702030 10/17/2011 ',i Page 2 of 2 MercuryNews,com significant amount of topography, which can make radio coverage almost impossible when line of sight is not available. Spotty #o nonexistent cell coverage in Cupertino has been an ongoing issue for residents. According fo a 2007 city survey by the city's technology, information and communication commission, 65 percent of residents thought cell coverage was inadequate, with the areas of Bubb Road, McClellan Road, the main Apple campus and Foothill Boulevard near the retirement community regarded as haVing the poorest cell coverage. Boosting coverage for all cellular carriers in Cupertino has been a city priority for the last few years. In February 2009, the city updated its wireless communications facilities ordinance, which brought about eight policy changes, including allowing antennas to be mounted on all existing and new utility poles and towers as well as allowing cell sites in public parks. For more information about the city's wireless communications facilities ordinance and other wireless issues, visit www.cupertino.org/wireless. L�.��9tthis website is being blocked by the IT Dept because the site my contain harmful adware/spyware. Please contact the IT Manager, 777-3189, if you require access to his website for city business. I � r F� 5� r� z�=,� .., � - ����i�.�` � I Print F�ow�red �Y . � .�.w��. , . .. 3�,. r� . _ � , �_ . � � http://www.mercurynews.com/fdcp?unique=131��84702030� 70 10/17/2011 I Page 1 of 1 MercuryNews.cam � f���, �������� numerous shops �O 1SS10 �� ��1� VO�� and eateries featuring Asian products and cuisine, ' including 99 Ranch Market, Fantasia Tea Cafe and �I°�1 o Villa � I"O� �C� Korea Tofu House. ex�e sio �11 o to cit� c� cil or a rov 1 �y nn�tc w�isor, mwilson@community-newspapers.com Posted: 10/14/2011 02:36:58 PM PDT Updated: 10/14/2011 02:36:58 PM PDT The Cupertino Planning Commission on Tuesday split on a decision of whether to give a three-year extension to developers to complete a project at Cupertino Village. The decision now falis in the hands of the city council. In April 2008, the council voted to allow the development of two one-story retail buildings totaling 24,455 square feet and a two-level parking structure in an existing commercial shopping center. However, last year the city granted a one- year extension of the use permit to August 2011. The applicant is requesting a longer extension due to waning tenant interest and an unstable economy, according to a city staff report. If the council votes for the extension, then the new project permit will expire in August 2014. According to the Cupertino Municipal Code �,�tthis website is being blocked by the development approvals contain an expiration period of two years from the date of the approval. IT Dept because the Site my contain harmful adware/spyware. Please contact the IT ', The original April 2008 vote was a close one. It was ManageT, 777-3189 if you TequiTe aCCess to appro�ed 3-2 by the city council, with council members Gilbert Wong and Kris Wang voting his website for city business against the project citing concerns with traffic j congestion and limited parking. The commission again debated the traffic issue 'I during the Tuesday meeting before reaching a splifi vote. Commissioner Winnie Lee was absenf. The center is located at the southwest corner of ' Homestead and Wolfie roads, across from the current Hewlett-Packard campus and future home of 4he AnnIP C'.amniic 9('.�irrantl�i C�nnar4inn \/illana hac �'rint Pc�wer�d �Y � �.�..� (�`x �r � r �f� � ��r����5��,�" �' I � � http://www.mercurynews.com/fdcp?unique=1318884727029 10/17/2011 '