Oral Comm. exhibit
oral
REPORT INTO ALLEGATIONS OF ORGAN HARVESTING OF FALUN GONG
PRACTITIONERS IN CHINA
6 July 2006 ~XHIBIT
(UNOFFICIAL) SUMMARY DOCUM~
cc 1-18-00
Authors David Ki/gourformer Canadian Secretary of State for Asia-Pacific
David Matas Canadian immigration, refugee and international human rights lawyer
CONCLUSIONS:
We believe that there has been and continues today to be large scale organ seizures from unwilling Falun
Gong practitioners.
We have concluded that the government of China and its agencies in numerous parts of the country, in
particular hospitals but also detention centres and 'people's courts', since 1999 have put to death a
large but unknown number of Falun Gong prisoners of conscience. Their vital organs, including
hearts, kidneys, livers and corneas, were virtually simultaneously seized involuntarily for sale
at high prices, sometimes to foreigners, who normally face long waits for voluntary donations of such
organs in their home countries.
It appears to us that many human beings belonging to a peaceful voluntary organization made illegal seven
years ago by President Jiang because he thought it might threaten the dominance of the Communist Party
of China have been in effect executed by medical practitioners for their organs.
Our conclusion comes not from anyone single item of evidence, but rather the piecing together of all the
evidence we have considered. Each portion of the evidence we have considered is, in itself,
verifiable and, in most cases, incontestable. Put together, they paint a damning whole picture. It is
their combination that has convinced us.
MAJOR POINTS OF EVIDENCE INCLUDE:
Conducive Climate for the Crimes
. Pattern of human rights violations: Rule of Law to prevent human rights violations is
glaringly absent in China. According to its constitution, China is ruled bv the Communist Partv. It
is not ruled bv law.
. Corruption: Trafficking in Falun Gong organs would be consistent with widespread corruption in
the country and notably with the other commercial activities of the Chinese army.
. Lack of legislation: On July 1, a new law went into effect; it bans the sale of organs and
requires donors to indicate their willingness in writing. Despite the law, it is known that there is a
large qap between legislation and implementation in China.
Documentation of the Persecution of Falun Gong
· Perceived threat: The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in particular president Jiang Zemin,
came to see Falun Gong as a threat to its monopoly of ideological power over China in the late
1990s; by 1999, the CCP estimated that there were 70 million Falun Gong practitioners. However,
the movement is not political and it followers seek to oromote truth, tolerance and comoassion
across racial, national and cultural boundaries; violence is considered abhorrent.
. Policy of persecution: We know that persecution of Falun Gong exists as an official oolicy from
policy statements issued directly by the CCP.
. Incitement to hatred: The CCP adopted 3 strategies to crush Falun Gong: violence against
anyone who refuse to renounce their beliefs; "brainwashinq" to force all known practitioners to
abandon Falun Gong and renounce it; a media camoaign to turn public ooinion against Falun
Gong.
. Massive arrests: Classified information reveals that by the end of April 2001, less than two
years into the ban, there had been approximately 830,000 arrests of Falun Gong adherents.
. Repression: The crackdown included Jiang's creation of a special force, the 6-10 office in every
province, city, county, university, government department and government-owned business to
spearhead the attack. Jianq's mandate to the office was to "eradicate" Falun Gonq.
Factors that Point Specifically to Organ Harvesting
. C'!nfession: One witness said her surgeon husband told her that he personally removed the
corneas from approximately 2,000 Falun Gong prisoners in 2 years and that none of the cornea
"donors" survived because their other vital organs were also taken, and their bodies cremated.
. Admissions of using Falun Gong organs: Investigators analysed numerous recorded
telephone calls with detention centres, hospitals and courts across China. Several officials openly
admitted to using organs from Falun Gong practitioners.
. Short waiting times: Hospital websites in China advertise short waiting times for organ
transplants - 1 to 2 weeks versus years elsewhere - or that they have living "donors" available
almost on demand. A lame bank of Iivinq "donors" is the onlv wav such short wait times can be
assured. Some websites have now removed this information.
. Many more transplants than identifiable sources: The sources of 41.500 transolants for the
period 2000-2005 are unexolained. Before 1999, China had 22 liver transplant centres, compared
to 500 in mid-April, 2006, for example. The increase in organ transplants parallels the increase in
persecution of Falun Gong.
. Unidentified / disappeared practitioners: Falun Gong practitioners, coming from around the
country to Beijing to appeal or protest, are arrested. To protect their families and people at home,
many don't identify themselves. This large Falun Gong prison population whose identities and
whereabouts are unknown would seem a Iikelv source of harvested orqans.
. Blood testing of practitioners in detention are systematic. It is unlikely that this is for health
reasons, while blood testing is a pre-requisite for oman transplants.
. Corpses with missing organs have been returned to families with no coherent exolanation.
. Interviews with victims of the repression now living in Canada revealed a pattern of activities
by authorities - such as inexplicable organ examinations - consistent with the alleqations.
. Huge profitability of organ transplant industry in China. One hospital website, for example,
lists the cost of a liver as being up to US$130,000 and a heart U5$160,000.
SOME KEY RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. As organ harvesting from living, unwilling people, is a crime against humanity. It should stop
immediately, and authorities in China should conduct a criminal investigation for possible
prosecution.
2. Organizations-intergovernmental, governmental and VOluntary-should take the allegations
seriously and make their own determinations on whether or not they are true.
3. As the UN Protocol to prevent trafficking in persons bans the removal of organs, the UN should
investigate whether China is in violation.
4. Foreign governments should ban the entry of Chinese doctors seeking training in organ
transplantation and any doctor there known to be engaged in such work should be barred from
visiting foreign countries permanently.
5. All countries should tighten their laws against organ trafficking and doctors should, for example,
be required to report to their respective authorities any evidence that a patient has received an
organ from a trafficked person abroad.
6. Governments should deny or revoke the passports of nationals who are travelling to China for
organ transplants.
7. No governments should participate in any China-sponsored meeting or research on organ
transplant. No private company should provide goods or services to any Chinese transplant
program.
----End----
****************************************************************************************
*****If you would like to help, please visit http://www.cipfQ.orQ/ to sign the petition form*****
*********************************************************************************