Planning Commission Agenda Packet 05-24-2011 Table of Contents
Agenda...................................2
2• CIP conformance to the General Plan for FY 11/12 to 15/16
PC staff report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1. Model Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.CMC2.32 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
3.CIP ...............................10
4. Matrix of Env. Notes for CIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
5. Matrix of GP Notes for CIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
6. Initial Study, ERC Recommendation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
7. GP Policies & Text Excerpts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
3.Application for a new health club facility at Vallco Shopping Mall
Staff Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
1. Model Resolutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
2. Focused Trafic Analysis by Fehr & Peers . . . . . . . . . . . 78
3. Plan Set . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139
4 . Director's Report
Director's Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
Enclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
1
.�
�
AGENDA
�UPERTINO CITY OF CUPERTINO
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino Community Hall
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
ORDER OF BUSINESS
SALUTE TO THE FLAG: 6:45 p.m.
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
POSTPONEMENTS/REMOVAL FROM CALENDAR
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter
not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the
Commission from malcing any decisions with respect to a matter not on the agenda.
CONSENT CALENDAR
PUBLIC HEARING
1. Subject: Workshop for Code Amendments to the R1 Ordinance
Recommended Action: discuss ideas for amendment changes
Description: Application: MCA-2011-03
Applicant: City of Cupertino
Location: citywide
Workshop to provide input regarding changes and updates to the City of Cupertino Municipal
Code Chapter 19.28, R1-Zones to improve readability and consistency and to evaluate the
requirements for R1 sloped lots between 15% to <30%, the 2-story design review process, public
noticing and story poles
Pa�e: No written materials in packet
2. Subject: CIP conformance to the General Plan for FY 11/12 to 15/16
Recommended Action: approve the City Project and Environmental Assessment applications
Description: Application: CP-2011-02, EA-2011-01
Applicant: City of Cupertino
Location: citywide
Review of the Five Year Capital Improvements Program (FY 2011-2012 to 2015-2016) for
conformity to the City's General Plan
Pa�e: 4
2
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Page -2
3. Subject: Application for a new health club facility at Vallco Shopping Mall
Recommended Action: Approve the Architectural and Site and Use Permit applications
Description: Application No.: ASA-2011-04, U-2011-03
Applicant: Western Athletic Club/Sears Roebuck & Co
Location: 10101 N Wolfe Rd
Architectural and Site approval for fa�ade, landscaping, parlcing lot and sidewalk enhancements,
including a new trash enclosure to service an on-site cafe, inside a new health club facility;
Use Permit to allow the new health club to open at 5:30 am on weekdays and 6:30 am on
weekends
Pa�e: 63
OLD BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Environmental Review Committee
Housing Commission
Mayor's Monthly Meeting with Commissioners
Economic Development Committee Meeting
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
4. Subject: Director's Report
Recommended Action: receive report
Pa�e: 153
ADJOURNMENT
If you challenge the action of the Planning Commission in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered
to the City of Cupertino at, or prior to, the public hearing. Please note that Planning Commission policy is to
allow an applicant and groups to speak for 10 minutes and individuals to speak for 3 minutes.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the City of Cupertino will make
reasonable efforts to accommodate persons with qualified disabilities. If you require special assistance,
please contact the city clerk's office at 408-777-3223 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting.
Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Planning Department after distribution of
the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Planning Department located at 10300 Torre
Avenue, during normal business hours.
For questions on any items in the agenda, or for documents related to any of the items on the agenda,
contact the Planning Department at (408) 777-3308 or plannin cupertino.org.
3
i
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY HALL
1(�30(� TORIZE 1�VENLT� � CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
(408) 777-330�3 � F�X {40�3) 777-3333 • planning@cu�ertino.or�
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. Agenda Date: May 24, 2011
ApplicaHon: CP-2011-02, EA-2011-07
Applicant: City of Cupertino
ApplicaHon Summary: Review of the 5-Year Capital Improvement Program, Fiscal
Years 2011-12 to 2015-16, for General Plan Consistency
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Commission:
1. Recommend a Negative Declaration for the proposed 5-Year Capital
Improvement Program (CIP), file no. CP-2011-02; and
2. Find that the proposed CIP is consistent with the General Plan as per the model
resolution (Attachment 1).
BACKGROUND:
Each year the City Council adopts a five-year spending plan for capital improvements
throughout the City. The CIP is critical because it prioritizes significant city
expenditures on capital projects of importance to the City. Funding is not fixed or
committed during the five year term. Typically, funding may shift in the second
through fifth years as priorities change and project schedules accelerate or decelerate
during the lifetime of the project.
State law and the Cupertino Municipal Code (Section 2.32.070.0 - Attachment 2)
require the Planning Commission to review the CIP for consistency with the General
Plan and make a recommendation on the environmental assessment. The City Council
is responsible for setting CIP funding priorities.
The draft CIP and staff's environmental analysis matrix of the CIP are attached
(Attachments 3& 4). The environmental review of the CIP is focused on the first year
funded projects as new projects funded in the second through fifth years are not
commitments because of possible future changes in City priorities. Attachment 5lists
4
CP-2011-02(EA-2011-07) Capital Improvement Program, FY2011/12 - 2015/16 May 24, 2011
Page 2
the proposed first year capital projects and staff notes describing how the projects relate
to the General Plan.
DISCUSSION:
Environmental Determination
The CIP list for fiscal year 2011-12 includes the following:
Projects with previous environmental reviews (see Attachment 4):
• Stevens Creek Corridor Park (Phase II) - Mitigated Negative Declaration
adopted in June 2006. If project aspects change, a separate environmental review
will be conducted.
The remaining CIP projects included in this review are:
• Repairs, renovations and relatively minor improvements to City infrastructure
and facilities throughout the City
• Demolition of a swimming pool and bathrooms in order to construct a sports
court at the Sports Center.
Individually, these types of projects are considered categorically exempt from
environmental review under Sections 15301, 15302,15303 and 15304 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. However, CEQA also requires
cumulative environmental analysis of the CIP. On May 19, 2011 The Environmental
Review Committee (ERC) examined the CIP and found that there are no significant
cumulative environmental impacts. Consequently, the granting of a Negative
Declaration for the entire CIP is recommended (Attachment 6).
General Plan Consistencv
The General Plan consistency findings are summarized below:
1. Projects that improve the safety and functioning of the City's primary circulation
system. See General Plan Policies 4-1, 4-3, 4-6, 4-7 and 4-8
Projects in this category include: pavement management and traffic signal battery
backup system.
2. Transportation projects that manage neighborhood traffic, decrease reliance on
usage of private cars and promote pedestrian activity. See General Plan policies
4-2, 4-3, 4-4, General Plan text pages 2-51.
Projects in this category include: Stevens Creek Corridor Park (Phase II), sidewalk
repairs and ADA ramps.
5
CP-2011-02(EA-2011-07) Capital Improvement Program, FY2011/12 - 2015/16 May 24, 2011
Page 3
3. Projects that maintain the usability of the City's parks and recreation inventory.
While much of the Parks section of the General Plan focuses on acquiring and
developing new parkland, the plan also recognizes that a well-managed park
system enhances the quality of life for its citizens. See General Plan policies 2-69
and 2-86, text pages 2-46, 2-51 and 2-52.
Projects in this category include: Stevens Creek Corridor Park (Phase II),
Stocklmeir Orchard and Blackberry Farm Golf Course irrigation, Sports Center pool
demolition and sports court construction, and Quinlan interior analysis &
upgrades.
4. Projects that reduce flood risks. See Flood Hazards General Plan text, starting
page 6-25.
The projects in this category include: gutter & curb repairs and minor storm
drainage improvements.
Prepared by: Colin Jung AICP, Senior Planner
Reviewed by: Approved by:
Gary Chao Aarti Shrivastava
City Planner Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: Model Resolution
Attachment 2: Municipal Code Section 2.32.070.0
Attachment 3: Five Year Capital Improvement Program, FY 2011-12 to 2015-16
Attachment 4: Matrix of CIP projects and Environmental Analysis notes
Attachment 5: Matrix of CIP projects and General Plan Consistency notes
Attachment 6: ERC Recommendation, Initial Study
Attachment 7: Excerpts of general plan policies and text
G:planning/ pdreport/ pcCPreports/ 2011CPreports/ CP-2011-02/ CP-2011-02.doc
6
Attachment 1
cP-2oii-o2
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
FINDING THE PROPOSED FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, FISCAL YEARS 2011-
12 TO 2015-16 CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN
SECTION I: PROiECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: CP-2011-02 (EA-2010-07)
Applicant: City of Cupertino
Location: Citywide
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received the proposed five-year capital
improvement program, fiscal years 2011-12 to 2015-16, as described in Section I of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this
matter, the Planning Commission finds in accordance with CMC Section 2.32.070C, that application CP-
2011-02 is consistent with the City of Cupertino's General Plan and a negative declaration of no significant
environmental impacts is recommended to the City Council under the California Environmental Quality
Act Guidelines.
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based
and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application CP-2011-02 as set forth in the Minutes
of Planning Commission Meeting of May 24, 2011, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set
forth herein.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of May 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission
of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chair
Community Development Director Cupertino Planning Commission
g:/planning/pdreport/res/'1011/CP-2011-02 res
7
I
� �i'I"I'ACI-�IVIEl\TT 2 '
2.32.010
CHAPTER 2.32: PLAI�TNING COMMISSION* !
Section
2.32,010 Established; governed by Resolution No. 7571 of tt�e Cupertino City
2.32.020 Term of office of inembers. Council. (Ord. 1974, § 4(part), 2006; Ord. 1787, § 1
2.32.030 Vacancy or removal. (part), 1998) ,
2.32.040 Chairperson,
2,32.050 Meetings, 2.32.030 Vacancy or Removal.
2.32.060 Amendments—Records required. Any appointed member may be removed by a majority
2.32,070 Powers and functions. vote of the City Council. If a vacancy occurs other than by i
2,32.080 Procedural rules. expiration of a term, it shall be filled by the Mayor's
appointment for the unexpired portion of the term. (Ord,
* For statutory provisions regarding the 1787, § 1(part), 1998)
establishment of a city planning commission,
see Gov, Code § 65100 et seq, -- See Title 17, 2.32.040 Chairperson.
Zoning. The commission shall elect its Chairperson and Vice-
* Prior ordinance history: Ords. 5, 5(b), 5(c), Chairperson from among its members. The terms of the
5(d), 167, 1166, 1213, 1321, 1459, 1549 and Chairperson and�Vice-Chairperson shall be for one year. '
1697. (Ord. ZO15, § 7, 2008; Ord. 1787, § 1(part), 1998)
`- � 2.32.050 Meetings. !;
� 2.32.010 Established. A. The City Planning Commission shall hold regular ;
The City Planning Commission is established. The meetings on the second and fourth 'I�esdays of each month '
City Planning Commission shall consist of five members, at six forty-five p.m. and may adjourn any regular meeting
none of whom shall be officials or employees of the City and to a date certain, which shall be specified in the order of
none of whom shall cohabit with as defined by law, nor be adjournment and when so adjoumed, such adjourned
related by blood or marriage to any other member of the meeting shall be a regular meeting for all purposes. Such
Commission, the City Manager or the staff person(s) adjourned meetings may likewise be adjourned and any so
assigned to this Commission. The five members shall be adjourned meeting shall be a regular meeting for all
appointed by the City Council, Each member shall be a purposes.
qualified elector in and resident of the City. Each member City Planning Commission meetings that fall on legal
shall receive compensation as established by resolution of holidays shall automatically be moved to the following day. (
the City Council. (Ord. 1787, § 1(part), 1998) B. Special meetings of the Commission may be
called at any time by the Chairperson or by any three or
2.32.020 Term of Offic� of Members. more members of the Commission upon written notice being
A. Commissioners serve at the pleasure of the City given to all members of the Commission and received by
Council. The term of office of the members of the Planning them at least twenty-four hours prior to the meeting, unless
Commission shall be four years and shall end on January notice requirement is waived in writing by the member, ;
30th of the year their term is due to expire, No (Ord. 1942, 2004; Ord. 17�7, § 1(part), 1998) i
commissioner shall serve more than two consecutive terms
except that a commissioner may serve more than tvro 2.32.060 Amendments—Records Required.
consecutive terms if he or she has been appointed to the A. The affirmative vote of not less than a majority of ,
Commission to fill an unexpired term of less than two years. its total voting members is required to approve a. ',
B. The appointment, reappointment and rules recommendation to amend the zoning ordinance; the '
governing incumbent members of the Commission are affirmative vote of a majority present with a quorum present
-. :-. --�
is required to take any other action. '
2008 S-16 29
8 'I
. "- � - _""__ � . . -- -� .. . _. _. - - � i
2.32.060 Cupertino - Administration and Personnel 30
B. The Commission shall keep an accurate record of =-: =_= -:
its proceedings and transactions, and shall render such -==- �
reports to the Council as may be required b.y ordinance or
resolution, and shall submit an annual report to the Mayor. i
To accomplish this the Commission shall be furnished with
a secretary employed by the City to keep accurate records of , ',
the Commission. All records so prepared by the secretary
shall be filed with the City Clerk, (Ord. 1787, § 1(part),
1998)
2.32.070 Powers and Functions.
The powers and functions of the City Plannuig
Commission shall be as follows:
A. Prepare, periodically review, and revise as .
necessary, the General Plan; ;
B. Implement the General Plan through actions
including, but not limited to, the administration of specific
plans and zoning, subdivisions, and sign ordinances; i
C. Annually review the capital improvement �
program of the City and the local public works projects of �
other local agencies for their consistency with the General i
Plan (pursuant to Sections 65400 et seq. of the California '
Government Code);
D. Endeavor to promote public interest in, comment
, upon, and understanding of the General Plan, and regulation
relating to it;
E. Consult and advise with public officials and .- :=-
agencies, public utility companies, civic, educational, _.,::_
professional, and other organizations and citizens generally i
concerning implementation of the General Plan; I
F. Promote the coordination of local plans and '
programs with the plans and programs of other agencies; i
G. Perform other functions as the City Council
provides including conducting siudies and preparing plans
other than those required or authorized by state law;
H. Establish as needed a standing subcommittee of
the Commission for Design Review, The Planning
Commission shall decide appeals of the Design Review I�
Committee for the purposes of conducting design review on '
projects that properly come before the Design Review ',
Committee for review, and conduct design review of a '
project as required by Chapters 2.90, 19.132, 19.134 and of '
the Cupertino Municipal Code. (Ord. 1844, § 1(part), �' '
2000; Ord. 1787, § 1(part), 1998) '
I
2.32.080 Procedural Rules. �
The Plamiing Commission may adopt from time to time
such rules of procedure as it may deem necessary to
properly exercise its powers and duties, Such rules shall be
subject to approval by the Council before becoming '
effective. All such rules shall be kept on file with the '
Chairperson of the Planning Commission and the Mayor and
a copy thereof shall be fumished to any person upon --_-_
request. (Ord. 1844, § 1(part), 2000; Ord. 1787, § 1 =. -. _
�Part), 1998) =-.. �
2004 S-3 �
9
� Attachment 3 �
�
!
�
�
�
�
�
�
� �
o - � ;
H '"� (
r" � �
�, �
° � i
� ;
w
�y I� � V �
�■Z■I � � h�y � w A ;
�
i
LL �
a° , ,
I° '
U �
�
�
10
.. .. _. __ . . _. . _ i
tD O O O O O O O O O O O O
� O O O O O O O
uy
r o 0 o ui ui ui ui
� ° N NN �° ^ � �u
� � r r r
�
o r o 0 0 ° o ° o ° ° o ° o ° ° o o °
L
0- ,� o 0 0 0 0 0 0
r
C o � � ° a � t h n
Q) N N N N �! tn
� � r r r I
�
� '
O d' O O O O O O O O O , O O O O - �'�,
Q. � O O O O O O O O O I
� � O O O O O tn tfj ln In I
N � � N N � ~ ~ O � ��
� c- r r r
,� I � M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O
V e- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
a. N ' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I
(C r O O O O O O' O O V' `Q' tl� ll') T N h '
-� O O � O N O O tn O I� N I� h tt h P ��
N � M et N N N N � O h tp
� N r' M c- N tp �
'
lL
� N O O O O� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
G1 r 000 O 0 O O 00 O O O O O 000
(n 000 O O O O 00 .O O O O O 000 . �
P
O e- O O O O O O O O� tp �(j �l°! � �A �['1 N M �
Q O O O�Y) �.C') O O O tn � (O � �' f� 1� 00 t0 N
o N NN N h N N NN d; �ttDaO �
a � e= �' r' M N I
'�"' '�'' � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O !
�� � O O O O O O O O O O O O �
L ,� � OO O O O OO O O O OO '
_� r- O O O O O O O O � lp In In ��,.
V m N N tf) I� m M 1� I� �d) r n M M .
r M M '
O O O O O O O O O O O O '
O O O O O O O O O O O O �
�� O O O O O O O O O O O O
OOOOO O O O� V tn O
. +�+ O lA t!7 l!'J O ln M O c- I� '�f tA . - �.
� � .. tn I� <1' � N V' O m � � �'
m M t � �--� I
�
N
C
� � � I
�
V � d
�- f 7
� �' a n1
� C � m•
2 J .. . .. . � C � .
'O y � u- � :.
O N � � Q � f.'� . ���.
�t3 F-
'.. u�i � U rn � c
L m `° '� (� a' � m
�� � rn o a Q cA c y c
d Y�.� � � � � � 0� C
O � c m ro � rn Y V m > `" d1 �
` ,o ,rn t� p a� m F- o a y u'
a rn_ ro Y V � �� � c o. ai � C
"` '� v ti �v � rn E� E °- � o a 3 '
o= ca �, a o a � N � �� �> u.
c
V N � m .�' � � @ a c ° 'a � v��, d '� � � ` '
a � O m� N� °- m� �n c�a '+ v� °? c�a 0 a� �
� o� J,� u � a� �� u� �� u � C� �� m
U'a� .� a� c� � w '� $ y
_° m E c� V c c y a�i �° a�i u. o� p�° U O�
Y�C�xSe �a� :o `° � a E i a E �a� �`' U
ro..�°�.m°°m�n. o���� o�c�u��m o`�� o o� o 0 00�
acnmv��nJZCn a— mc� I— cnn.UZ� h hz> �— v�� h I— hhz
�r rn rn ao ti v� o<- c�
°0 Oc c�-� oN Od�'V�' O O(p
C O Q� p� p� p� p� O� O p� � O O p�
�y p� h O O O O p O q�j O O � p�j O
d' t� V ��' � N N N .
��
_ _
<o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
r- o 0 0 0 o a
N o 0 0 0 0 0
r o 0 o ui ui ui
N N N � � ~ h
r' r" P
� O O O O p O O O O
r' O O O O O O
,y, o 0 0 0 0 0
N N N b � ~ �
� r' P
e- O O o O O p o O O O
C M ' O O O O O O O O
� O O O � tt� O N h n
� N t " � N N M - W
� e- r r
�
C
d M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
� r O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O o O
C r (`') O O M O O O O � d' LL) IP! N
� O N �CJ O h O O tn O f� N h h t�
� N � M M N N N N 4� O t0
�.. N �- M r N N
L
d
L
++
o N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O '����.
N �r O O O O O O O O O O O O O '��.
W O O O O O O O O O O O O O ��..
� N O O' O N O O O � N tl') �C'1 N
� O N O tp l[i N O O 4� r- l0 i� h l0 -
Z N 'V' N N � N N N N � l0
(y� � e' N
,
W
�
C� r O O O O O O O O O . O O O
W �� r O O O O O O O O O O O
= O O O O O O O O O O O
Z � 7 O O � N f�+l M �� O n I�.� N
W U m N N � h t� t� �fl M
> r N �
LLI '
�
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '
y o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
� m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�ri v uS o ',
�� t� ti � 7 � N V O� � � � ���.
H �
m c7 .- I� r
O
O '
O O '
O p
d � O
W �
7 � O � p � � � � . C
G � � O h � p O 'O 'O G 'O 'O = p f�j
p� �� O� � C G C C p U
L C C N N u � � d ' 7 7 � 7 7 LL 'O Q
Zj fd i i� � � LL LL. � LL lL n h = C
� C tq 'O � C C U C C I- '
O � � N C C C C O O =p O O y( X (n � u- �
L N � 7 � @ @ � (0 @ f0 f0 (� (6 (` �
a LL o LL. LL LL LL LL � N 0 `7 N I I-� Q N E
� fd N N N m N N N (�0 N N � N � N N �
� > a� C� m� �� a � � c� c� U C7 C� in �
� �
N m Q '
O � ,'�
ti. a n
� � � m
� = J N '�'.,,
�C C Y (0 �'�.
� N Ip � N . m � '�..
� � @ � U � � C . a ..
U s `° � � °-' -N _
a n, rn o rn a t/� c w
� '� � � o c��a � � ° E W
� � a ° m ro xs Y � � z
o '°' � c� ° N c 3 � 1 ° ul
W � rn � � � y ? E � � o E �w�,
> U = L � A n � �� � '� � W
LJ" Y � � a� � ¢ � c � �� � ro p '
'� � � O � �„4 � °- m ro,v� m s� m� v�
y�j � Cj c .� . otS y � � � � � � •v 5 , a E _
U �° �� � °' N � �� � f 0 0 � O O
Q c ° � d a�i c a N c� v; °� C� � °� � �� � i� J
E e. E
o � a�i �- -° o 0 3 3 0 `w° � •� .`� � i � 3 i « � � "� '.S E ° � l
ro m o � d n. 0 7� o .� m� a � ro o � c ` o i, o � � o O
Oe a in m� in in � z cn r m c� r rn o. c� z a i- t- >�n a- cn � r e-
12
_ s
i
Q
� � � � $ � � � �
0 o m o m ° o ° o ° o ° o ° o ° o ° o ° o
o �, o �, o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �
� �, o o ui o 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 - � N O � M � � � � N� O �
L, O U M �. EA 69 EA EA G9 EA N N
� � 'C b�} E!} ffl 6�} �
�'�"� � � �
� � E � �
> N N j
o W
O V ;
� � r
� �
� �
� �
Q u '
� L
�
LL �
Q N � �����.�'�.
U
V � �
�
N ,� c ,
O � � i
r- L �
O 0.. a� �
N � } o [
i � � � '
� � � o � �
O C _ � 0 3 ;
N � � � >, o i
y- c
'" � o °� � >, n , ` -� c I
�. � c � U .� �
LL � `s =o c � � p � �, cn � '
o � �c s N >, � t0 � �n
C -p -p �
� � q'`'j > � .� � O +�. �
� C � Q Q (!J Q �- 3'
� � � �' � � � U � � !
C
R3 = � �, N m (� �-
c � � � O m C a � E � '
U � o ` �
c � ¢ � � � � ""' m � '�
� L •� � o � a� _ � � �
` c a c �
a, � a� o. � a � I- � h i �' o
N �" °� "_ � �c � �c �
�v °� � „�,�, � o o a� a� U o� � � �
y � a. � , � C� � a� E?� !
p � `- a� a�i �' �' ° U � L U �° � �°
'� � V
c ` n. ° ca °" c�i
a�i = � � � n. � � a Y � a�i o �' ro '
. A � � o � � � = ro � o � a
a U (n J � !� CO (� � h � (n � > �
13
__ _
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� o I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o j o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
�'�`•:�:�:� o � o oi o ui o ao ; ai o o ai ui ui ; oi
:.:�;.;.;... � o o�n ao u� t� o ao � u� u� o ao v t� �
� tt r V' � M tn ln � i M ��� (h M
:::�;:;:�: � r t� � � � ui r P
:.:.�.;.r:.,: :
•: • ti.�:;: G3: : I I
:}.:F. ,
:;�.,.;.:. I I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; o 0 0 0 0 0 0
�;;�: � o 0 0 0 0 0
;, �. � o o I o 0 0 � o
° o � � � ° o � , ti
� �n u� u�
� j .- r- r"
� �
:;:�: : o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0°o °° o ° o
•�� � o o y o 0 0 � o
:�:�>:�:ri ' ° o � n ° o � n '
:� .. u� u� �n �n
�������'
� r- c=
� ;�'n�i:�:�' i �
.�y:•:•:•: •:•
;. i !
:13:'�'�'�'� '�'
��:•:�<t.- ' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
.'.r.' O O O O O O O O� f
/� �" ' O O O O O O O � O
� •1!M*�:•:r� :� O O r � O O � h
.�•.•.':•. • 'd' � � � � � O�
:�;.;;;,; : � I � � 1 �
\ ' �'' j {
:'fr,'.`,:::::::: ::: I
:�•:•:•:•= �
:��};�:�: �}
:��:�:�:�: •:�
•:•in- •. o 0 0 0 0 0.o 0 0 ; o 0 0 0 0 0 � o
;�;'T:: � � O O O O O O O O O O O I O
O O O O O O O O O O O O I O ��
.'.T' ' Ih O � O� O M m O O� «> � m
I� � N� 1� O h V' LL� O N f� I � ` ��.
N �A � tn M i� <!' N. O I I� � �
.- e •- tn M N � LL
� i i QC '�,.�,.��.
G
G
_
�
•.•iC11. • O O O O O O O O O � O O O O O O O "'�,
'�'�t-' O O O O O O O O O O O O O -
'�' O O O O O � O O O O O O O O �
'.•x%. � M I� O tn tn �C1 1 ln O O tn ln � � �i
W n � d�" ~ N I V r N d�' �~ V�' �,'
r i M � r � (+j ��.,,,',.
i
� . �'!' ,.�..
.� W'+'
.' V.
:: •�^. � ,��.
,.. 'r.' I+ . Z i.... '..
:.' #�: > LL z �'' '
:�: f�: w � � N '
W � � �:
�: .V� � m
:, �� p � U` -�. . . !
' �' �: � � O O Z �:
:: Z z ti" � 1- 1- � ��� W '
:�. �: �? � � U Z � H V �� �
'.• LL. � F lL p���� w . � Z
':' �l;': � W O� p� a(�9 O J '�^' Q�
': d: Z v�� Y� z Y w � :O: � cn v o
w w u. v� � O �> o
� Q W F- �%�'� fq Z W li. � J
;�: U` � m U a� h 0- � Y � W LL. �
II II 11 11 II II II II II .�. � J �� Q H .
.•. ��. Ur R.' C7 C7 a tn F- d O �� 0 m cn h� o
:�>:;: �: _;
�..''>:�:�> tl�� Cn:
14
_
_
i
.��.
� '�'.�.'.�' • j 1
.�.�.�.�� i
.'.'��-.•.•.—�� � ' �
•.•:g.'.�.Q,'�.; : � '
i.�.•.t'+' i
: : ��:��: �
:�:o:�:w�
.:.�.:.�: � �
�:•:a::•:�• ;;:
:�:•z�:•�: •:�
•:•:�:•:U• :•�
:� �°;
:.�:
� �
, i
:;�: � �
'T I
..T. �
' I
^•j.... � I
'. ,'�
,. .'� ',,,.
.�'.'.'.'. '.' .''".
��'.'.�� � � � 0 � .,�.,�,�,.�
.� .. R; , � 0 � � 0 ��.
.�.� .� � � � �
� O O O I O
�' � �' �' �'
.�'.•.•.•.
. �..;.,.;. i ' .
.��...�,�� ,
;�.•.•.�.� :':
� . .
.�.Y.•.•.'.' .'� . ..
•.�.c'D. • � O O O O ' O O O O � O '�.
'.'xr'. ' ' O O O O � O O O O O '��
};.N ; ' O O O O O O O O 1 O ��..
•.'sr. ' . I� N � 1� 1 � O � O � t� ,��..
� M � V �— M ' p '..
�
� e— M N � ; M '�..
� ' Y
Q '
�
:;::�;;: o00 o i o 000 0 0 ,
. o00 0 0 ooa o jo ,
;:.,�,.,. . o 0 0 o i o 0 0 0 0 o i
ao � o ui o 0 0 0 0 � o
'�� � N � � ti N N� N � � I �
1 � � � �
i
� i
�
. ❑
::: tI)' N
>: iY.F� � W �
:': � o a ° �
��' �: Z :�:�:� Y w o °
�- �
:�:� > � z V�: ¢°a �� ,
:�::V1. W � o a �
�: � C7 ¢ p
;{':','.{'•' � W Q j � � � � � U '
....,.,•> :4.� p: Q 00 •' p � � � Y �
:�;i{:.: : . . ' .
0 W � � � � � LL �
��'�'�'�'�; �� o o z O: p�Q�
'��'�'�'�' �: Z Z O Q Z Q �-. � �' Y� V���
:�::.:,:,: �: tL O V V�� Z w a ' : W� O J� W
�: j J I= J x W p p� n. � LL; � p�. �. o g Z
:: V. 2' LLI � Q ��� U � I- �: U U LLJ L1J �y� W
:-: �: z U� c i � o Z �> o �:: z ��� Z� �
w w m ¢
���c��mc�ac � �°� >c����� �.,
.• :�:�:< :� u u u n u u u n u o: �: w LL O O� O
...�.�.�.: ����° °�'ao a �m��g� °
::�:�:�: �
:itL:.:�:�:�: cir. �:
15
_ s -
I
:�:�:• w: �
:::d:::�
�:..w.:•�: 1
�:�:�:�: ��
: :.��:��:
:�>��;:�:
�:�:c�:�:�z�
�•�:4:�:��
�:•.�.•. �
•:•n:•:�:�:
�:•:z:�:•��
: �: •�•: � :U:
:�:�'0:
:•:•:�:•
:::::�:
.,.,.�.
:::::�: �
.,...�.
�
i
� �
i
i
: �::; 0: ,
:•. C�.•
:; �:
.::;:�:
ti^✓:•; Y.
� V: �: : �:
�
i
�:4Li:!�:� � '.
�'.'�. �
.'�•:•:�: � . p �
. ��•. • �. p ,'�.
.� p y� i
d' � i
:�:;: �
u�:::::;:: a
:.:; �:
:•:•:u; a a � � a
���� O O O O O O
���� h tn f� O �A O
M CO M
� N �
•:•i'E7:
:•:•:#�; n. o..' C� C� � �
'.'�T' O O O O O O O O .
'.•.F.• O O O O O O O O '�
�' � O!� O tn ln O tfJ � ..
N N t� N r N
M Z M N M N
Qf O Q� - Q1 C! Q�
� rn w
N _° c � � `o � � � .
W m �m Y o
2 � L � � � V w C � � .
` C N � N� � U t ��
O � d ,O V 1 V « �
Y E � m` � W O o. 9 � � � t '
� o 0
Q o 01 �° o � F° c � ° Q � E � m
� Y N O .�
Q c a
�' � a m a.E 0 V � � � r vi o !C a ���.
� > > i m o V LL � � `� � � � � a U� o
o " D tn ° y LL' � ' ° �] m � m � � � Y � / o r
- c
� .�'� d O LL ' � O o U U V Q N � � � li L y
LL � � �� C y+ C N C G� qI C L° } p Q C U . ��.
� O
�� r ` m d (7 � LL � o W � ,.
o � m °- ° � 'a � W ° '3 � 'p a m m (� � f0 °� ,�..��.
U Y ; J o �o � � c� � 'c o �'�..
� � � o u o m �I O ' 0 3 U 7 �' o m a+ Q � a+ °: � .
� d rn m m U � V/ (' d N � o m
Y m U � o a° Q� .E d m � rn r � � a �
W m w 3 h f0 � C � Q � o� G o 'E y � J � Y � � �.
�,{J v a�i x� � m O �. q 'y ,k.° O �/ Z• tf q / '� c) p� c °' .
� c .�„ � � � al m �` � X o � m N s � Z W L L u C 1 °" �' Q O .
:{:.:,;,:.;. U v rn fO ��� rn 'O Q °� _ m 'a � w � LLl � m U
d
�.��/������� � 'm c�� c� m m � / 0 m�' � io �J m o ia �J o ia Z � r N
�:.i:•:•:�:• in O.�.. 'p � � O i °. v_� �"' N > °' W � c O
W C C1 C � ✓ U I°' U �' N aD F� 0 9 C 3 F" U � F' W Q � �.
V
V� W � VJ V/ � ���
16
i�:��� I
:�:���:�b
:�:�
�:��
.:. �:.: �
:..�:�:�
:�:��: �
..,.�...� �
. •. �: •; U
.;:. � '
:�: :ia !
: �: �.i. ',..�,..
:�.�.� ........
. •. •.:., '�,.
..
: C :.: W''. .
4 �
: ! , + ,n !:;�;�'
•V:•:�
•.��/:�:•.•: I
:Ldr•:•i:• � I
:n::::�:>:
:��:��
:�����
:w�:�: ;.
��:::� � �
:w::::�: �
:�:::::_: �
�..... . . . ;�
�;i� �:�> a
:.:.:0
:•:�:u:;
:�:�:cs
.•.•.t—.
:�:�:N
.•.'.r.� � �
������� � ,',�,,,�,�,I
•'.•N O
. .'T" O ,',,
•. . , O ,'
4) '
N j
N
E
°
m
v
c
m
�"' °
� a
� �
c
O� N
.�
' V ^ �
VI �
� O
Wm �
O N
N
a� .. W
V/ � o
N � V
W � �
N �
� O
� �o
� � a
U �� 'qqq y �
' . . . . y, C �Q . .
�u
.".:.:. o
��
V/
17
s
: >:�:vi �
::.ca >� �
, �: :�
:.:�...;., ,
��:�:° ! ! I �
:�����W i , I
...�...� ..` il
:�:��`� �.: �
.:.�:.;� :, �
''� ' ° 3 ° I I
::!�j I
. • .--
1 '
� '
�`urs � o � o
:: v'
, t - i
I �
�V .' .
•V .' . .�"��.
.� '� "'',,,.
'�.'. d� O O O O .,.,,.
.....; � i
.�'.'� ' �
:�•.•.•.• I .
.�'.•.•.• �
:�•.•.•.• � �
.f�i�l•.•.'.• •' .
•�.....;. .' ���
'� .' ',
• fi._...;. .• ,'',,.
'...e. O � O O i p .....'',.,
'�' O O O i O '..
��. � O � O O � O v/ ',,,..'�,.
N ' N N N /11 , ��,....
i V
1 � Q
J
�_
�
: �: � °o � ° ° ( °
� o 0 0 0
:�: =: o � o o � o
N I N N � N �',,...,.
;
i �
0
:�' �. Z '•'�'• .
'•'•'�'•'• � I. Z �
:� .... U: � � � � �
;•;.;.; (�: �W Z F, � p
•�'•r'�' �' W � m � ' . �..
�Q»>: .�� ❑ w Z Z � � a '
��'�'�'�' �' � 2 � � Z � �
�zzo ¢z¢�� � .C�` o
._.����': �: �° u � o�� Z W o � w
:� �� � u� o¢ o g a� o N �' z
�� �� z U��i. c � o Z �> z � Z
:: o:W W m Q Q �� Q W Q �: g J
:�.:.:...:; j�; i? � m �7 a. v� r� o J �. Z �¢
:� ...�.���.���ooc�c�> � Q: � o
:::.::: .�: c� � c� c7 a. u� F- o. o m �; c1 i--
.�..:.:.: . .
;;:.:: u � i : �
18
_ ._ _ s
:�:�1�:��
. �. w:... .
�:��:�:c'��.
n
`:�:�:�
:.:t�
�•:{�.;.w
�:• �: �: �
•.•�:.•.�
:�:�z�:•�
... �:.. �
:�:�:�
:::::m
:::,:,:
�:•.��
�.�.�.�
.:::: n
:�:�;
.:�:�
..�����
:;0:�:�:�:
��:�:�:�:
�d:::::;: � i
:�:�:p I
::a::�:�: �
:�:::� z
:iu::::::: °
:��:�:�:� �
:���:<` m �
:�:::Q �
:�:�:� o
::::�; °
0
0
0
N
..'.' � � '�..
•:•:•t'iJ O '�,.
•.•.•.r. O '..
•.•.•�• p ,,,.
�.�.��r O , ,�'�,.
O
N
1
i�
N '
N '
N '
O� � '
m
E. ��..��,.
a
•g
� m
W °� '
� m '
� �
w
U m
a =
� � '
� m
� �
� �`
>- �
� �
a =
z �°'
a `°
a
� W
O m
.•.'.'.�.�.�. � c
.�.�.•.•. W U �
w � �
:: .:::' � � o
.�.�.�. o U
:;:.,�:•:�: � Q �
:�:-.`�� ` d
���'''''' Z � a`
;�>:�:�: �
:��:�:�:� C�
19
__ s
,
�...,... .... ,
�.�.�.�.�.�. . . . . ,
...rA: � i
�'� 4:�:� ' I
:�:tu.•.;�: �
�:�:�:�:•�- :
:•:��•:•:o: � !
��� � �� .
'�'+= ' i
. .�. . z . �
...�:�:� �
:.:.�.:'� ;:::;:.
�:�:�:�:�� :..
:�>��>:c�: �:
�.�cfl. � o � o 0 0 ; o
:::�: : o ° o_ ° o_ ° o_ ' o
��• � ° o ( ° o �° � ° o
� � � � N � �
r ; c
i �
�.��� � O I O O O t O
•' �•' � O O O O ' O
.'.•.•.•.^' � i
� � � N N �
e- � r � ; .-
1 �
� .� �:� .
:•V�i:�:•: �:•
•�:•:•;•:• :::
:�.'•:+�*': • O O O O � O
�' •' O O O O I O
��•�'�t�+�. • O O O O O
•�iiii ' � � ��f7 N N � � �
:�::.:. i: • r- � c- I �""
;�:":;: � i W
:13;1::;::>.: >� w
::� :::::::: :::::: �
.�.,.... •.�.;. �--
:�:�:�:�` :����� u�
i
;,�.N; .; o o i o 0 0 0 0
��� N O � N N O� N I
tlY tn O N N�!l O
r' (V c-� N
� � I
::�:N: : � � � 0 0 � �
'�' �' O � O O O O
•.•.�. • � � � � � �
<t ' d_ N N � d_
� i � � �
�
�
:,: �: �
�
:: ,.�� � LL
:;: t,} � a '
:�: � o Q �
.�. �: w � .:�:�: � ¢
��� O: � � o v9: Y �
::::_:;::.:. .t1.3. w � v '
... � Z �, �. Q
:�`������� � � � m � W �- l i
���'�'�'�' � o w � � �: W o W I
'•''''' � Q �� O O O �' W � W �'
��':.:.:. �" Z L� � H Z F- U �: (� Z(�
�: = z O ¢ Q F- ,� Ce: ¢ Q ¢
:�::::::: �,k�;•. � O � 0 � � Z w � �: Q � a
.'.�''. ::;i;, �' J I-- J W p �� d I� � LJj � '
LL•' Q � � � p. � p O �'L:
:�':�:�:�: � W� U` r" Y� Z`..G W � Q: W� �Z
. . . . . . Z U � � � O � > F-
' ��' �' �'' �^: w w m ¢ Q f-- � ¢ w w �^� � � .�
:�.°::�>:�: {� i? � m c7 n. cn f-- o- � w �� w m w �
u u u u u u � >�> F-
:�;:.>:,: �: ti U U F- � � C7 C7 > I- 'Q: Q� Q O
:�..::.,: � C9 � c9 t7 a cn I- a 0 v� .,**��� a U a F-
:1:G.j;;: �•. '�,;
:�:;:;:;:: �� �:
:�•:•:•:•: � ��
20
_ _
:::::N:
:::ci:�:�
�.
�;�:�:�:
:::�:��a
>:�����:
:.:�
;:�
:�:��:��
.�.c�,�.�a
.:.�,..�
:«:�:�:
:�:�:a � �
�:�:•�� � c�
0 0
������ o a
���"'� o a
.'.'.r. � �
N N
:�:� � �
t[} O O
� �'�. O O
;�:;,',e�-,` O O
N N
•�ii:•: �-
:�•:•:•:• .
� ��':•:•:• '�,�.
:��:�Q � �
������: o 0
:�'�'m: o ° o �
��':�:T. � � W
,�' (.... N N W
.� �
:%:�:•:ti �
,r '"'
�I.�i:!•i: v/
'.•.•.� � � � �
'•'�0'3� O O O O O
� O O O O O
�'�� � � O ti O � �
N N � �
�
:�:�:cj: F- F- I
...:.�: � �
::�:� o 0
.... o 0
'.'.C'. � � � .
N N
O P
� �
'd' �'
W ,� O7 •
c ,fa y � U
d L m 3 � �
c o y (/� a 'y rn c
'm o � � � M c o i
E O « Y. U N . ul ,�.
� ° � � '� a F �. '� � ',..�..
rn� m n. 3 u a � a �'�
� . � v
� � W ;O U . /Y N d V ����.
�� � � � � � v . ¢ O . ...,.,.
E o'm � m Q Y�� �
� � c � f � � � V o °� ''.��.
3.n � J � c (� a � c a � '�.
° o t� m � Q vi � � � � m c '��...
Z ^� y W £, y 1— E ��
Z '� a ID >
w�� � o� UJ o°e .o o.
G rn a�i m � 'm c a °- � w � ��.
Y � .
c a � W o � w v
W �^ � � � � ` /M {p C � N
. v � � .� � $. •� `� O � Y � .
C � a C �
Z � O lL m+ � w � w Z C � d a+ .,'..
Q C = c W � N VJ m � N ..
� m o� O `m � o � �-. rn� E o
.'.•��•�•�•�• j d C� Y V � y E V N Q � N V � ��.
''' � N � � i+ � C �. ir I V ;� C rta '��.
. �' •' •' •' � a o p � G1 = � .L. QI Z � � a � Q1 ����.
•�:•:•:•: W d m v« o � a`�i a o W m�a a w, o . '
:�j:.:.: � F o ¢ � a I-'�- 3 a F °' ° 1 0' �.
:�.':�.'. . .
.r�:•.�.• . . .
:Cll>:�:�: O�. ( a '
21
s
,
.... ,
�.�.�.�.�. ,
...
.�.�.
� .... ,
�.�.�.�.�. ... , .�.�. � -
:�:Q.:.�: ;
:�w:�:s: �
:•.�:.:J• � i �
.•:�2•.'�; i � i
•:�:•:��• ' �
•:•�:•:�. • i
:•:0:�:•W . � I
•: tY�:•:tK: . � I
:•:4.•:•(Y• :�' I
':'Z':':�: '>:'> �,
:•:�:•:�W :�� I
' •' I ° � ° �
. . '
�.'�' � � � �'�.
. .
i ; '�,,,,,,,�,',,.
�
i
'.•.�. ' i O � O . �I
. •. .r. • ��,
'•'•'�:•:'�Y'; • �
. . . . M, • i i �
��:•:�i: • ��.
i �
'��/�:�:•:•: • i i ..',�,..
:4I':' }. : • i i .......�,.....����.
:� •:• . ,�,........�..�,..
.Lii•:•:•:� .•' ..�..�',�,.
�:,:�: • ; 0 i � ,,.�,..�,.�,.�..
a , , i i ....�,....
: '� . �' •:•cY? :::
:� �� i �
�:�:�:• ' � �
:�•:�:�:� ' i i ..'�..
:��;:,:,; ;: '����.
:� •: •: •: � : • i ; W .,�.,.,..
.>•:!•:•: •:• , � , .'.
....r.•.•.•. •.•
.�'.•.•.'. •.• � , �.
,�.��� • � O � O I1 ''.
, ' �. i �
'.�� i � .�I.
i i �
�
�
�:��� . : ° o ! ° o ° o ° o ,
. '�� ' O ' O O i O '�
�.•e�r' . i
....^� • ' � i '� V � V" .
..... . � . I I
I I
� �
I I
�
;� :.:::.: ::::.:. >: W
� :• �: ;;� Q
� : W:
;�� � '
:�•:•:�:: �. � �
:� :"7�: W ? LL
'++I:�:�:< :�' � LL Z � �,;
:�l�J::::::::th: W Z ° �.
f.(�;':;: ��7� w �,q «:
� m ... o
:GJ:f�:�:::; :�: � � � �
.�•.•.. Z � z z � �: v
�:;:;:;:: :C]: _ � o o z w
.... .ZLL� F=. � � '
��������� ��� � o ° v � z � � � � W
.,......... .
:�'�'�'�' ��'�'� � �_- '� °� o a � O' Z �-- '
�..:?::� :LL:: � W p � o � u � ° ° .��-.': � v �
:UI�:::�:�; :�: w� C� �— Y� z Y w cn w: z a.
'•'• •'•'•" Z U LL (A � � �
.. i:�':• W W[� Q Q F— �
�;�:�:�;�: ��: U' � m C7 � O I= d � W �`� Q
u u n u u u u u u � �`' dU a
:LL':::::::: :Q: u. � �� o o c� c� > � � ¢¢ o
:LJ:;_:.:.:< ��; c� � c� c� a cn i-- a o �n ;Q > m F-
'r—� $
_. �
:�<�:�:� :�
��:�»: f13� C�:
:::;:�
>:d::;�
�:�w.�.�
:;:�:�:�
'�'��'��
:�:'��:�F::�
:�c�:�:z
:�:o�:�ts]
•:•�:•:�
:�:Q•:•�
•:•�:�:�
:•:�•: U
:•:•:�
,.,.,�
:;:;:�
.,.,.,�,,.
�:�:�iii
.,.,.�,,,.
I
:��:_� '
�� �.: ,
�
��:�:
:c:�>:�: �
:o:::::< ,
:�::::::: ��
:�:::::::
��'�:a ���
:�:::�
.�:.'� I^
.�.•.�. v+
:C� W
:��'�'�:� J
:�::�:�:�: V
::::: i� Q
.�.•u,;
:�>:ci �
:�:�:c�i V '
. •. •. r. � �,.'��.
� '
. � ,.�,.',�,'�,.
� I
:•:•:Q LL ..
•'�'•� �
•:•:•[V O
'.•.•�t++ O
;:.;.� O
'.•.•K�+ �
�'
0
�
�
�
rn '
c
V °
LL E
LJ. `
� � �
W �
O �' E
'•'.'.'.'...� � /^ '' .',,,.,'.
V/
. �7 y '•'.':' (� p„ o,
�.�.■ ' � _
.W'.•.•.• " " Y '�..
. WeY'.'.'.' /q U � � .��'�..
vs a
•�:•:•:•: � ' U ,...
�e:l:�:�:�: E. m � $
e.
......•.•.•. Z a o
:�:.:.:` �, r
:�;.:.::`. 4 -' � _ ° y
:�i�:•:•:� Z � '; y V .
....... � � � V
• V i:•:•:
•�.•.•.•. � m � a 'm C1
.�•�.�'�. � � ~ � a ',�..
Q� Z . ,,'�'�
•�.•.•.•. � ',.
a
�F;<:�:�: > v�
23
�:�:'t;7 � � ��,
�.':p:�:�: : _ � ',
�'�'W'�'� ' �
::::�::::-�: : I �
:•:g: ��: '
�:<�:�:� '
:•: c9•:•�: �
: •:p: {t1: : � �
:�: �;.;�. •:�
�:•.fi:.•.� :..
:•: Z•:•�: ;:;:•:.
•:�:�:•:� .�
' ' �' ° o ° o ° o ° o
�' �•' � o � o 0 0
��� �'" ' n n ti � ti
j
I I
� � '
:�>.�: �: ° o � ° o ° o � ° o
�:�:v: �: o i o o i o
"N' ' ^ � r n i n �
i i
i i
;�;;;;;;;; � i i
:4� :�' . I I
:ii•i:•:�: •:• '
� �' �: � � : • O � O O � O ......�,.�,......�,....
.� � � O i O O i O ''�,
�•.t�' .• � i � � j � �'��.
1� i i� h i f� !
i� i i �
:iLi•:•:�:•: •
:�:�:•:•:� :
i i
:�•iii: • i i .
:�i:•ii i
,w.•.•.•.• .•. .
:�:•:•i:• :•� I
•i:FO: • O ' O O O �, ''�',,
•.�.c. • � O - O O O ,,
'. P. • O O O O � '...
•.•.�. • � ^ � n � .',�.
� ���,'�,,�.
i � G
Lis
O
. 1'� ,,'�,.
N
0 0 0 � o
.'.r.' � O O O O ���.'�,.
.'.r.' ' � I r I` t`
� �
� � i
:•: �. '
:•: � '
:} {;�•. f� '
....,..., �: � ~
; �:;: <: •: Z Z
�,�„ W
:��:�:�:�: p : � � o W '
:�Q�:�;�:�: i�j: � Z � o
:��:�:�:�: {�: W � :�:�: �
� m
:��:�:�': z: � c� � �: �
..,., o w z z � ��
��'�''''�� � o �� o 0 o z
:�;::::::: �� LL � � �- �: �
•... Z Z O Q Z Q� V
��''�'�'�' �: LL � U V�� Z w Q O� �
'r�r" " .., � f- � � p p� d F- �; �
�
t�: ° o;: o
:�:Q'zc�ii�c~n�oZ�> � u' �
��� �" w w m¢ a t- �¢ w w O: � .�
'.'.':::;:;: �: �? � m c? a cn � a. o � j:: Z H
�'�'�''�:� � �� o o c� c� > � �: o
:�:::;:;:� �n ¢: � �
��. �:
:t��<:�`: �
�°r':.`:.' � ��
�:
: t� :� : �:
i
::::: �: �
:�: �i:::�: ;
�� w.��g:
:.:�_:�;.,_ '
:�:��-:��: � �
:>.�::: z i
:.:v:�:w I
�:��.�.�
:.,a.;.�:
.;.z:.:.�
;.:.�...�
:�:�:a. o
�����w: cn
_ �:�:�co: o !
�.�.M. o
::.:,� °
.... �, �
�
�:�fl: o i
�� �. �
+n o
.,. o
:•:�.�. ' I
'� W � i
}��'�'•'•' r
: �/': • i:! � .
: � �' �' �' �' ���.
:�'ii:•. Z '�..
�l.T ':.:�, � � Q ���...
LL
� '�:•:•�: O . '
•W;•;�_ . O� � ,��.
• �. ^ � '',�..
.W...;.}_ O '
.� ��� .
;!�4.•.•.•.. v♦ .
•:•:•fl: O
:�:•:44 �
>:�:ri o
.'.'. �-�+' O . �
'•' ��� O . �.
.•.•.'� . � �.
r
.•.•.L7 p
� i i?�5+: (n ..
�:•:•lV: O '�,.
. : r' , O
•.•.e�. !
'. •. •.eN tf)
n
N
�
t0 I
� '
m
�
•
� �
Z c
W �
� �
W �
/ y
O �
�
� �
1Jw `1
N
� �
Z �l0
••'•'•.....;. v .Q ..
. .... U
��•'•'•'• C . .
❑ �
Ol ,
. �4
N o
o � Y
.'. . .'.'.'.. L � •� U .
d
r
� � �° o
. p � LL � a
LL
0
, . �' • � ���.
G
25 '
Attachment 4
Environmental Assessment of File No. CP-2011-02
City of Cupertino First Year Programmed Projects
5-Year Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2011-12 to 2015-16
Pr4'ect Title '' Fro'ect Descri tion En�iranmental Review Nates ''
Stevens Creek Install bridge and extend multi- Separate environmental analysis
Corridor Park use trail thru the Stocklemier was completed. Mitigated
(Phase I� Property and connect to Stevens negative declaration adopted by
Creek Blvd. Expand Blue the City Council on June 20,
Pheasant parking lot and install 2006. Project aspects are likely
a SCB crosswalk. Project to change and a separate
includes restoration of 700 linear environmental analysis will be
feet of Stevens Creek. com leted.
Stocklmeir Orchard Install temporary irrigation and Categorically Exempt. CEQA
Irrigation rehabilitate an existing well to section 15301, Class lh:
preserve the heritage orange maintenance of existing
orchard. landscaping; and CEQA section
15304, Class 4f: minor trenching
and backfiling; CEQA section
15302, Class 2c: Replacement or
reconstruction of existing utility
systems, involving no expansion.
Blackberry Farm Golf Replace the existing irrigation, Categorically Exempt. CEQA
Course Irrigation clean the existing ponds, and section 15301, Class lh:
Upgrade and Hole restore existing well for water maintenance of existing
Modification supply. Modify the 8 tee box and landscaping; CEQA section 15302,
fairway. Class 2c: Replacement or
reconstruction of existing utility
systems, involving no expansion.
Sports Ctr. Pool Remove existing pool & Categorically Exempt. CEQA
Demo & Sports Court bathhouse. Replace with an all- section 15303, Class 3e: building
weather multipurpose court. of accessory structures.
Quinlan Interior Correct ADA deficiencies and Categorically Exempt. CEQA
Analysis & Upgrades update interior finishes, furniture, section 15301, Class la: minor
fixtures and equipment alteration of existing facilities.
Pavement Ongoing maintenance of street Categorically Exempt. CEQA
Management pavement, which may include section 15301, Class lc: repair &
pothole filling slurry sealing and maintenance of existing facilities,
overlayment. such as streets.
Curb, Gutter, Funds for the repair of curb, gutter Categorically Exempt. CEQA
Sidewalk Repairs & and sidewalks when they meet section 15301, Class lc: repair &
ADA ramps repair criteria, including maintenance of existing facilities,
accessibility upgrades. such as streets.
1
26
Attachment 4
Pra'ect Title ' I'ro�ect Descri tion EnvirQnmental Review NQtes '
Traffic signal battery Final phase to install battery back- Categorically Exempt. CEQA
system backup up system on various traffic section 15301, Class lc: minor
signals. repair & maintenance of existing
facilities, such as streets.
Minor Storm Drain Funding for emergency repairs as Categorically Exempt. CEQA
Improvements needed in various locations. section 15301, Class lb: minor
alteration of existing facilities
2
27
Attachment 5
General Plan Consistency Notes for File # CP-2011-02
City of Cupertino First Year Programmed Projects
5-Year Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Years 2011-12 to 2015-16
Pr4'ect Title ' Fro'ect Descri tion General Pl�n �'Qnsistenc Nates '
Stevens Creek Install bridge and extend multi-use Maintain usability of city parks. �
Corridor Park (Phase trail thru the Stocklemier Property See General Plan policies 2-69 and
II) and connect to Stevens Creek Blvd. 2-86, text pages 2-46, 2-51 and 2-
Expand Blue Pheasant parking lot 52. Decrease reliance on private
and install a SCB crosswalk. auto use. See General Plan policies
4-2, 4-3, 4-4, general plan text
pages 2-51.
Stocklmeir Orchard Install irrigation and rehabilitate an Maintain usability of city parks.
Irrigation existing well to preserve the See General Plan Policies 2-69 and
heritage orange orchard 2-86, text pages 2-46, 2-51 & 2-52.
Blackberry Farm Golf Replace the existing irrigation, Maintain usability of city parks.
Course Irrigation clean the existing ponds, and restore See General Plan Policies 2-69 and
Upgrade & Hole existing well for water supply. 2-86, text pages 2-46, 2-51 & 2-52.
Modification Modify the 8 tee box and fairway
Sports Ctr. Pool Demo Remove existing pool & bathhouse. Maintain usability of city parks.
& Sports Court Replace with an all-weather See General Plan policies 2-69 & 2-
Installation multipurpose court. 86, text pages 2-46, 2-51 & 2-52.
Quinlan Interior Correct ASA deficiencies and Maintain usability of city parks.
Analysis & Upgrades update interior finishes, furniture, See General Plan policies 2-69 & 2-
fixtures and equipment 86, text pages 2-46, 2-51 & 2-52.
Pavement Ongoing maintenance of street Proj ects that improve the safety &
Management pavement, which may include functioning of the primary
pothole filling slurry sealing and circulation system. See policies 4-
overlayment. 1, 4-3, 4-6, 4-7 & 4-8.
Curb, Gutter, Funds for the repair of curb, gutter Projects that reduce flood risks. See
Sidewalk Repairs & and sidewalks when they meet Flood Hazards General Plan text,
ADA ramps repair criteria, including starting p. 6-25. Decrease reliance
accessibility upgrades. on private auto use. See general
plan policies 4-2, 4-3, 4-4, general
plan text pages 2-51.
Traffic signal battery Final phase to install battery back Projects that improve the safety &
backup system up system on various traffic signals. functioning of the primary
circulation system. See policies 4-
1, 4-3, 4-6, 4-7 & 4-8.
Minor Storm Drain Funding for emergency repairs as Projects that reduce flood risks. See
Improvements needed in various locations. Flood Hazards General Plan text,
starting page 6-25.
1
28
I
Attachment 6 I
, City of Cupertino
' ' 10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
FAX (408) 777-3333
P E RT 1 N Community Development Department i
= INiT1AL STU�Y - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKL[ST"; ' i ��
, � � Staff Use Only :
EA File No. EA-2011-07
Case File No. CP-2011-02
ttachments CIP document
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Environmental Review
Project Title: 5-vear Capital Improvement Proqram, FY 2011-12 to 2015-16
Project Location: Citvwide �
Project Description: 5-vear proqram of expenditures for Citv capital proiects on Citv
lands: parks, qolf course, sports center, communitv buildinq, and public streets
Environmental Setting: All proiects are located on citv-owned, infill properties alreadv �I
developed with public buildinqs and ctrounds: parks, qolf course, sports center,
communitv buildinq and public streets. �
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Site Area (ac.) - Building Coverage - % Exist. Building - s.f. Proposed ,
Bldg. - 0 s.f. Zone — A, PR, & other zones found G.P. Designation — Public Facilities, ,
On citv streets Parks & Open Space, Transportation, '
Very Low Density Residential
Assessor's Parcel No. - - - '
If Residential, Units/Gross Acre - I
Total# Rental/Own Bdrms Total s.f. Price
�
Unit Type #1 !
Unit Type #2 '
Unit Type #3
Unit Type #4
� Unit Type #5 ;
Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check) ,
❑ Monta Vista Design Guidelines ❑ S. De Anza Conceptual '
❑ N. De Anza Conceptual ❑ S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual ;
I,
❑ Stevens Crk Blvd. Conceptual ❑ Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & Landscape i
If Non-Residential, Building Area - 0 s.f. FAR - Max.
Employees/Shift - Parking Required n/a Parking Provided n/a '
Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area - YES �� NO ❑
29
I
I
�. � • � �
� INIt1AL�STUDY S�URCE LfST , �_ ��
�
A. CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN SOURCES D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES (Continued) �I
1. Land Use Element 26. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District �,
2. Public Safety Element 27. County Parks and Recreation Department
3. Housing Element 28. Cupertino Sanitary District '
4. Transportation Element 29. Fremont Union High School District
5. Environmental Resources 30. Cupertino Union School District
6. Appendix A- Hillside Development 31. Pacific Gas and Electric
7. Land Use Map 32. Santa Clara County Fire Department
8. Noise Element Amendment 33. County Sheriff ;
9. City Ridgeline Policy 34. CALTRANS '
10. Constraint Maps 35. County Transportation Agency
36. Santa Clara Valley Water District
B. CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS
11. Tree Preservation ordinance 778 E. OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS
; 12. City Aerial Photography Maps 37. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant '�
13. "Cupertino Chronicle" (California History Excesses
Center, 1976) 38. FEMA Flood Maps/SCVWD Flood Maps
14. Geological Report (site specific) 39. USDA, "Soils of Santa Clara County"
15. Parking Ordinance 1277 40. County Hazardous Waste Management
16. Zoning Map Plan i
17. Zoning Code/Specific Plan Documents 41. County Heritage Resources Inventory �
18. City Noise Ordinance 42. Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel
Leak Site
C. CITY AGENCIES Site 43. CaIEPA Hazardous Waste and
19. Community Development Dept. List Substances Site
20. Public Works Dept.
21. Parks & Recreation Department F. OTHER SOURCES
22. Cupertino Water Utility 44. Project Plan SetlApplication Materials
45. Field Reconnaissance
D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 46. Experience w/project of similar
23. County Planning Department scope/characteristics
24. Adjacent Cities' Planning Departments 47. ABAG Projection Series
25. County Departmental of Environmental
Health
tr�s
A. Complete all information requested on the Initial Study Cover page. LEAVE BLANK SPACES
ONLY WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLICABLE. i
B. Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete, the checklist
information in Categories A through O.
C. You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s) '
in the "Source" column next to the question to which they relate. '
D. If you check any of the "YES" response to any questions, you must attach a sheet explaining the ,
potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed. �
E. When explaining any yes response, label your answer clearly (Example "N - 3 HistoricaP') Please ',
try to respond concisely, and place as many explanatory responses as possible on each paqe.
F. Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the Preparer's Affidavit.
G. Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City.
✓Project Plan Set of Legislative Document
✓Location map with site clearly marked (when applicable)
30
I
I
I
i
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
c °
� ,� � v � �° ° L � �° v v
ISSUES: _�� ��� o f- � ca o ca
� • � Q. N .� a n.
[and Supporting Information Sources] a�� J� 3:*' v J�� �
cn v� c cn ;
� L AESTHETICS -- Would the project: ;
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a ❑ ❑ ❑ � �
scenic vista? [5,9,24,41,44]
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, ❑ ❑ ❑ �1.
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a ,
state scenic highway? [5,9,11,24,34,41,44] i
i
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual ❑ ❑ ❑ l�l '
character or quality of the site and its
surroundings? [1,17,19
d) Create a new source of substantial light or ❑ ❑ ❑ ;�,
glare, which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area? [1,16,44]
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In
determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and
Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by
the California Dept. of Conservation as an
optional model to use in assessing impacts
on agriculture and farmland. Would the
� project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique ❑ ❑ ❑ �
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the i
California Resources Agency, to non- '
agricultural use? [5,7,39]
b) Conflict with existing zoning for ❑ ❑ ❑ � ',
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act �
, contract? [5,7,23] �
(
c) Involve other changes in the existing ❑ ❑ ❑ .�,
environment which, due to their location or '
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use? [5,7,39]
31
0
c �
� � � � � � � � � � �
ISSUES: c.��°_- `° N' �� a �� Q Z ° Q
[and Supporting Information Sources] o � � � � 3 � �`o � � E �
a cn J v� � c -� v�
III. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the
significance criteria established by the
applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon
to make the following determinations. Would
the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of ❑ ❑ ❑ �.
the applicable air quality plan? [5,37,42,44]
b) Violate any air quality standard or ❑ ❑ ❑ �
contribute substantially to an existing or
projected air quality violation? [5,37,42,44]
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net ❑ ❑ ❑ � �
increase of any criteria pollutant for which '
the project region is non-attainment under an j
applicable federal or state ambient air quality '
standard (including releasing emissions '
which exceed quantitative thresholds for !
ozone precursors)? [4,37,44]
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial ❑ ❑ ❑ �
pollutant concentrations? [4,37,44]
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a ❑ ❑ ❑ �1, ',
' substantial number of people? [4,37,44] ',
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Vllould '
the project: j
(
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either ❑ ❑ ❑ �,
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
[5,10,27,44] . ';
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any ❑ ❑ ❑ � �
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or
US Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44]
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on ❑ ❑ ❑ �
federally protected wetlands as defined by
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(includin , but not limited to, marsh, vernal
32
i o
I � � '
��+a � p c � �.� .� i
� � h o� (
° ISSUES: c � `� N � . � ° Q. � Q � Q
dc c3._L �n'c
[and Supporting Information Sources] o � � � a , � o � a , � � ;
o. cn -� cn � c J'v� ;
; I
pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means? [20,36,44]
d) Interfere substantially with the movement ❑ ❑ ❑ �l i
of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native i
' resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
;
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites? [5,10,12, 21, 26]
e) Conflict with any local policies or ❑ ❑ ❑ �
ordinances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance? [11,12,41 ]
� Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan; Natural ❑ ❑ ❑ �
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan? [5,10,26,27]
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the
project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in ❑ ❑ ❑ � ;
the significance of a historical resource as ;
defined in §15064.5? [5,13,41]
� b) Cause a substantial adverse change in ❑ ❑ ❑ �Ll
the significance of an archaeological `
resource pursuant to §15064.5? [5,13,41]
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ❑ ❑ ❑ T�l.
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologicfeature? [5,13,41]
d) Disturb any human remains, including ❑ ❑ ❑ l� '
those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
��,�1
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the
project: �
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk '
of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ '
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the ,
�
�
�
33
I
I
I
I
i
i
' O =
�
� � ++ � � Q L � � ++ ++
. I � � � � � � � � o �
� �$$UES: C = � N � '- � Q, � ;� C, Z �
[and Supporting Information Sources] o � E � � 3 � � � c� � �
a c� J v� � c J cn
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
� Special Publication 42. [2,14,44]
; ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ �
[2, 5,10, 44]
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ❑ ❑ ❑ ,�
i liquefaction? [2,5,1Q,39,44]
iv) Landslides? [2,5,10,39,44] ❑ ❑ ❑ C�
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the ❑ ❑ ❑ �
loss of topsoil? [2,5,10,44]
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is ❑ ❑ ❑ �
unstable, or that would become unstable as
a result of the project, and potentially result
in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
I [2,5,10,39]
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined ❑ ❑ ❑ ,�I.
in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1997), creating substantial risks to life or
property? [2,5,10]
e) Have soils incapable of adequately ❑ ❑ ❑ �J,
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water? [6,9,36,39]
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS — Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or ❑ ❑ ❑ �
the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
: materials? [32,40,42,43,44]
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or ❑ ❑ ❑ �
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment? [32,40,42,43,44] ,
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle ❑ ❑ ❑ � I
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one- uarter mile
34 ',
'II
i
- I
I
0
>'�� �� o� ��.� .�
� � � o v
ISSUES: `" �° ~ ° � �°
a y=•3a'a N �a Z �'
[and Supporting Information Sources] o � � � � � o N � � �
v a�._— —
a cn —� v� � c —� v�
of an existing or proposed school?
� [2,29,30,40,44]
d) Be located on a site which is included on a ❑ ❑ ❑ ,�,
list of hazardous materials sites compiled '
pursuant to Government Code Section
� 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
i significant hazard to the public or the
environment? [2,42,40,43]
e) For a project located within an airport land ❑ ❑ ❑ �,
use plan or, where such a plan has not been ;
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
! or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area? []
fl For a project within the vicinity of a private ❑ ❑ ❑ �,
airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the i
project area? [ ] �
f
g) Impair implementation of or physically ❑ ❑ ❑ ,� �
I
interfere with an adopted emergency '
response plan or emergency evacuation '
plan? [2,32,33,44�]
h) Expose people or structures to a ❑ ❑ ❑ �
significant risk of loss, injury or death '
involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with '
wildlands?[� ,2,44] �
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
-- Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or ❑ ❑ ❑ �
waste discharge requirements? [20,36,37] ;
b) Substantially deplete groundwater ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ !;
supplies or interfere substantially with j
groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level '
(e.g., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing land uses
or planned uses for which permits have been
' granted)? [20,36,42] '
, ;
35
__ s
i —
� � c
0
o �c
� �
'��-�� �v�c�°'c �vc�o o�
ISSUES: � ,� � ,� . � a N ,= c. � a
[and Supporting Information Sources] o � � � � :� v � � � E
acn Jcn � c Jcn
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
' pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river, in a manner which would result in i,
substantial erosion of siltation on- or off-site? �
[14, 20,36]
i d) Substantially alter the existing drainage ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or
river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surFace runoff in a manner which i
would result in flooding on- or off-site '
[20, 36, 38]
� e) Create or contribute runoff water which ❑ ❑ ❑ � ;
would exceed the capacity of existing or '
planned stormwater drainage systems or i
provide substantial additional sources of �
polluted runoff? [20,36,42]
fl Otherwise substantially degrade water ❑ ❑ ❑ �.
quality? [20,36,37] ;
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood ❑ ❑ ❑ 1�
hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate
Map or other flood hazard delineation map? ,
[2, 38]
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area ❑ ❑ ❑ �,
structures which would impede or redirect I
flood flows? [2,38]
i) Expose people or structures to a significant ❑ ❑ ❑ � ;
risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of ,
a levee or dam? [2,36,38] '�
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or ❑ ❑ ❑ ,� '
mudflow? [2,36,38]
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would '
the project:
a) Physically divide an established ❑ ❑ ❑
community? [7,12,22,41 ]
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, ❑ ❑ ❑ �
polic , or regulation of an a enc with
36 '
o =
_
�a�v =� ° ° s�v i
ISSUES: c=� N=3� N=Q �°�
[and Supporting Information Sources] O � � � � o N � � �
. aN � � = J�— —
� _
jurisdiction over the project (including, but
not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
[1,7,8,16,17,18,44)
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat ❑ ❑ ❑ �.
conservation plan or natural community
� conservation plan? [1,5,6,9,26]
X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the
project: '
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known ❑ ❑ ❑ � I
mineral resource that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the state?
L5, � Q]
b) Result in the loss of availability of a ❑ ❑ ❑ �,
locally-important mineral resource recovery
site delineated on a local general plan,
specific plan or other land use plan? [5,10] ,
XI. NOISE -- Would the project result in: '.
� a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, ❑ ❑ ❑ �],
noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies? [8,18,44]
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of ❑ ❑ ❑ �
excessive groundborne vibration or ;
, groundborne noise levels? [8,18,44]
c) A substantial permanent increase in ❑ ❑ ❑ �
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project?
I�, � s�
d) A substantial temporary or periodic ❑ ❑ ❑ � �
increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing without
the project? [8,18,44]
e) For a project located within an airport land ❑ ❑ ❑ ,�, '
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in the '
37
i
0
� � _
� ��i -�� ° L t�v v
ISSUES: �_`� �=3� N=Q Z °Q
[and Supporting Information Sources] O � � � � v � � � E
a cn J v� � c J v�
� project area to excessive noise levels?
[8,18,44]
fl For a project within the vicinity of a private ❑ ❑ ❑ �
airstrip, would the project expose people �
residing or working in the project area to (
excessive noise levels? [8,18]
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would
the project:
I
a) Induce substantial population growth in an ❑ ❑ ❑ �; i
area, either directly (for example, by �
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)? [3,16,47,44]
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing ❑ ❑ ❑ �
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] �
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, ❑ ❑ ❑ �
necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] ;
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial '
adverse physical impacts associated with the '
provision of new or physically altered i
governmental facilities, need for new or ;
physically altered governmental facilities, the ;
, construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain ;
acceptable service ratios, response times or '
other perFormance objectives for any of the .
public services: ;
Fire protection? [19,32,44] ❑ ❑ ❑ ,�
Police protection? [33,44] ❑ ❑ ❑ �, ;
Schools? [29,30,44] ❑ ❑ ❑ ,�. �
�
�
Parks? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] ❑ ❑ ❑ ,� l
' Other public facilities? [19,20,44] ❑ ❑ ❑ �
XIV. RECREATION --
a) Would the project increase the use of ❑ ❑ ❑ �
existing nei hborhood and re ional arks or
38
O �
C
�� v t� o i t� v v
ISSUES: �' E ao �—vca o�c
�- cn = '_ a� •= z
� N'
. [and Supporting Information Sources] o � J� 3 � v ��� E
a c n c n c - � c n
other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
' facility would occur or be accelerated?
i
[5,17,19,21,26,27,44] �
i
I b) Does the project include recreational ❑ ❑ ❑ �
; facilities or require the construction or
� expansion of recreational facilities which
� might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment? [5,44]
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC --
Would the project: '
f
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is ❑ ❑ ❑ � i
substantial in relation to the existing traffic
load and capacity of the street system (i.e.,
result in a substantial increase in either the
number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)? [4,20,35,44]
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, ❑ ❑ ❑ � '
a level of service standard established by the '
county congestion management agency for '
designated roads or highways? [4,20,44]
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, ❑ ❑ ❑ ,�
including either an increase in traffic levels or
a change in location that results in ;
substantial safety risks? [4,?] '
I
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a ❑ ❑ ❑ ,� �
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [20,35,44] ,
,
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ � ;
[2,19,32,33,44] ;
i
fl Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ ❑ � �
[17,44� I
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or ❑ ❑ ❑ �
programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicyde ',
racks)? [4,34] '
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS —
VVould the project:
39
j
_ . i
O
� � C
O �C
�
*+ � IC h�� t�C O ��� p t�C
ISSUES: c� ,= N ,_ . � n, N , C n, Z fl,
[and Supporting Information Sources] o � � � � � o N � � �
a cn J v� � c J'v� — —
a) Exceed wastewater treatment ❑ ❑ ❑
requirements of the applicable Regional �I
Water Quality Control Board? [5,22,28,36,44] �
b) Require or result in the construction of ❑ ❑ ❑ ,� '
new water or wastewater treatment facilities
or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant I
environmental effects? [36,22,28,36] j
c) Require or result in the construction of ❑ ❑ ❑ � I ,
new storm water drainage facilities or I
expansion of existing facilities, the '
construction of which could cause significant ',
environmental effects? [5,22,2�,36,44]
e) Result in a determination by the � ❑ ❑ �
wastewater treatment provider which serves I
or may serve the project that it has adequate !
capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments? [5,22,28,36,44]
fl Be served by a landfill with sufficient ❑ ❑ ❑ �� '
permitted capacity to accommodate the '
project's solid waste disposal needs? [?] ''
g) Comply with federal, state, and local ❑ ❑ ❑ �, '�,
statutes and regulations related to solid �
waste? [?]
I
�
�
i
40 '
i
i
XVIL MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFtCANCE
(To be completed by City Staf�
. ;
� a) Does the project have the potential to ❑ ❑ ❑ �
j degrade the quality of the environment,
I substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife i
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the �
range of a rare or endangered plant or '
animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or
prehistory? []
b) Does the project have impacts that are ❑ ❑ ❑ :�. ,
individually limited, but cumulatively '
considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects)?
Ll
� c) Does the project have environmental ❑ ❑ ❑ � '
effects which will cause substantial adverse '
effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly? []
PREPARER'S AFFIDAVIT
I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the ;
best of my knowledge and belief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding I
accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appropriate source references '
when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. I ;,
hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause
delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold
harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of ,
such delay or discontinuance. '�,
Preparer's Signature ��.� e�.--
Print Preparer's Name Colin Ju q
: 41 I
- ` ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION (To be Completed`by City Staffl
ENVIRONMENTi4L FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
� The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a"Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality
❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology /Soils '
❑ Hazards & Hazardous ❑ Hydrology / Water ❑ Land Use / Planning
' Materials Quality i
F%
❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population / Housing ��
�
❑ Public Services ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic
❑ Utilities / Service ❑ Mandatory Findings of
Systems Significance
. DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds that:
❑ The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. '
❑ Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have !
been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
❑ The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an i
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I
�
❑ The proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant impact" or "potentially �
significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT '
is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
❑ Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, �
because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b)
have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project, nothing further is required.
�--,�"�' � 5/17/11
Staff Evaluat ; Date
�, �! ���' '`�
���'f _�.%'�,'�/f, 5/19/11
�C Chairperson Date '
42
i
��
CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
May 19, 2011
i
1
As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council 'i
of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project �
. was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on
May 19, 2011.
�
[
i
PRO�ECT DESCRIPTI011T AND LOCATION �
Application No.: CP-2011-02 (EA-2011-07)
Applicant: City of Cupertino �
Location: Citywide '
�
i
DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST '
I
i
First year (FY2011-12) projects of City of Cupertino Capital Improvement Program, FY
2011/12 - 2015/16 except for the following project which has already undergone '
environmental analysis and review: Stevens Creek Corridor Park (Phase II). '
FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE i
The Environmental Review Committee recornmends the granting of a Negative
Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and the
cumulative impact of the otherwise CEQA-exempt capital projects is determined to be
insignificant.
/ s/ Aarti Shrivastava �!,
Aarti Shrivastava '
Director of Community Development
g/erc/REC EA-2011-07
43
__ i
2 "�'� LAND USE�COMMUNITY DESIGN
Policy2-67: Stevens CreekPark Cornmunity Resources _
The Santa Clara Counry Parks pro- The City of Cupertinds main role in ��
gram should pursue the goal of con- open-space planning, in the past, has been in
necting upper and lower Stevens developing neighborhood parks. In the future,
Creek Parks. The County parks budget in order to create a stronger sense of commu-
should pursue acquisition to the extent nity, Cupertino needs to also develop and
� possible and emphasize passive park emphasize more community park facilities.
development in keeping with the pris- Presently Memorial Park, which encompasses
tine nature of the hillsides. Work to the Community and Senior Centers, is the
keep the watershed and storage basin only venue for community festivals, large
properties of Stevens Creek. group events and cultural programs. The
development of new community recreational
Pol►cy2-68: Continuous Open Space facilities, such as a skateboard park, commu-
Actively pursue inter-agency coopera- nity gym and teen center, have not been pro-
tion in acquiring properties near the posed for inclusion within neighborhood '
westem planning area boundary to parks due to the intensity of use, noise and
complete a continuous open space �acceptable traffic they would generate.
green belt along the lower foothills and I
to connect the open space to the trail �e Sports Center, 6.2 acres at Stevens
system and the neighborhoods. Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road, was
acquired as an extension of Memorial Park. It
SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT is one of the few City-owned sites appropriate
for intensive recreational use, due to its loca- . !
The Santa Clara Valley Water District tion on major arterial streets, its proximity to � '',
can help Cupertino carry out its open space public transit and its location in relationship
policies by continuing its policy of cooperat- to the Community and Senior Centers.
ing with local government to fund access and
restoration projects. It helped Cupertino pre- Blackberry Farm is a 33-acre park, open
pare its natural flood plain policy for Stevens space and golf course facility along Stevens
Creek between Stevens Creek Boulevard Creek Boulevard between Scenic Boulevard
and the Stevens Creek reservoir and directly and Byrne Avenue that charges a per-person ',
helped to buy open-space lands within entry fee and is only open weekdays in the ,
McClellan Ranch Park. The Water District summer. The City is preparing a master plan
has a plan to parmer with cities and the for this facility in combination with the adja- '�!
county to provide access to creekside trails cent McClellan Ranch, Simms and
and parks for recreational opportunities, Stocklmeir properties. Council goals for the
This plan, the "Clean, Safe Creeks and plan include ?s:commodating year-around
Natural Flood Protection" plan, requires the use, incorporaeing a trail system, minimizing
Water District to incorporate trails, parks neighborhood impacts and restoring Stevens '
and recreational opportunities into existing Creek corridor. �
or new flood protection projects.
The City's master plan for this entire '
acreage is intended to convert the facilities
from majority non-resident to majority resi-
�'
����. � I
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN '
44
== -. _ .. � I
'� OPEN SPACE� PARKS AND TRAILS 2'4' /
�� O,�en S�ace
Monte Bello �� ' Rancho San Antonio Rancho
Open Space `.� Open Space Preserve San Antonio
Preserve ' CounfyPark I�
� r Sunny�de
L :,�_. ,�� InsA4os HOMESTFAD POAD � �� �.
� h � ,.
� � �-- 1 ��' �_�� I PRL �
`Ji �. e+` C- � � ry`OFI06 1 AVE ��
I , - _. � h ��,�� O , � m "
� � �� ra :� " .� s a ;
� � `'� � LL sa�,� cmra
� � . I .� � � o i�
a
� : �' .: o" '�.
� --- -�- i ' � � � ��� --' � �Q t STEVENS CflEEK 3 BLVO
.. . I � . ''/ �� 1 � ; � �� i
I f / �
_ j _-� ~� 1 ��d ` �l ( (� e - i¢ / a 4 E
��`�^~�"—\ 1 McCLELLAN �
_� ' i " ; /j '_' _" __'� �..� ROA� I � � � J i
` ��' , � ` � � S '_! � � I
�` � � I � 0 ! F
\ . \ I \ h ? ¢ ' .. � m BdLLINGEP 0.0 �.
\ � � ` �� L�nda Vista ' I
� � � ' '� -- -� � .�.__%�1�1.Gi�y o J � s�,or� i �
+ � , ,, - — ~� � ,- � t� Pa �� m % � �
�,..� ' V\ � �` - � � �� � o� j wNSOw owve
�.; I � Monte Bello a � r�` '
� � r �,� �rG `�_ ''�_ Ope Space �
�, �____ .�--�
3 � i 5 �� �
�.- �,,, " Preserve � � � �� vnosaECT . i
4 y„�.� �, t � � R �k �.. t� � � .. ` PI[Chettl � ,, °� � :� � � �'r" xo
i :,�� � c�' �''� �' RanchArea E, , ?-1 �. s°,°�°�
- � c� � � , ��ir;
;, � i �. \ � �'� �, #�;,.;��
' �i J r � LEGEND
� �U� �' � � � � �����I. ��� � '� �x
� �
3;3 � j j �`, � � �: �- � -,, � j ' ; � � , � � i� ,,` ,� Existing County Parks
- 3 � �s . � c <
11 �
��� � hc � _% �� _ '� > � � �'�� r F = Existing MidPeninsula Regional
�` � " y"�' '� �� Open Space Preserve
� �>>\ fa;" � � _ ��' ,�,:,
! ��� �. ` i` __ � � � � � '—'.� Proposed Expansion of
E �?�� � . � ' �` j ' = � �.,____� RegionalOpenSpaceLands
� ; '�� - . z.. ti� � = - -- _.�
� (� - Public Access to
'� ! �--- � � - ' � � Stevens Creek FremontOlder � Open Space Preserves
r
� � —��=-'" `.'" �L•� Counfy Park Open Space
Preserve o��°°° Proposed Open Space Linkages
tong Ridge Upper Saratoga Gap Proposed � City Boundary
Open Space Stevens Creek Open Space Stevens Creek ���
Preserve CountyPark Preserve Trail Corridor � Urban Service Area Boundary I I I
— — Sphere of Influence
Includes over 13,000 acres (over 20 square miles) of public open space --- Boundary Agreement Line
in Cupertino's boundary agreement area and contiguous jurisdictions. � Unincorporated Areas ;
0 OS 1 Mile
Figure 2-H. Existing and Proposed Public Open Spu,ce o,000 3000Feet
0 500 � t000Meters '��,
dent use and will allow the inclusion of the
acreage in the park inventory. �' '
Policy 2-69: Future Use of Blackberry
Farm ,.
Retain some form of revenue-generat- __
ing potential at Blackberry Farm '
(through the life of the municipal
bond that financed its purchase) as the E
Blackberry Farm �
� �`': �
�,.�'f �
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN !
45
��4(� LAND USE�COMMTJNITY DESIGN
uses are transitioned from non-resident Boulevards. Adjacent to a hotel and apart-
to resident use. Increase cominunity ment complex, this privately owned area is .
park acreage, and consider the finan- available for public use.
cial implications of this transition.
Policy 2-71: Private Open Space and
Sfrategy: Recreational Facilities
Blackberry Farm Master Plan. Prepare Encourage the continued existence '
a master plan for Blackberry Farm, and and profitability of private open space
solicit broad public participation. and recreation facilities through incen-
tives and development controls.
Policy2-70: Recreational
Opportunities for Special Needs Policy 2-72: Public Use of Private
Provide more recreational opportuni- Open Space
ties for special needs groups, such as a Seelc cooperation from private
Braille or fragrance park for the blind, landowners for public use of private
and wholly accessible trails for the open space.
aging and/or disabled.
T'rails
Private Open Space Resources Trails and paths connect people to each
There are several private, open-space other and to open space and park resources.
and recreational-activity businesses in They provide an alternative to driving from j
Cupertino's planning area, including a golf place to place. Promoting more trails and ��� I
course, riding stables and clubs offering tennis connectivity along creeks, hillsides, and I
and swimming. They are valuable to the com- through neighborhoods is a major goal of the
munity because they provide services that are General Plan. Providing access to open space
not traditionally provided by the public sector and parks is not completely dependent on
on City or regional parklands. Land use con- trails. Sidewalks and streets can also connect
trols and incentives should be incorporated pedestrians to their destinations. However,
into public policy so these operations can occasional barriers break the continuity.
continue. Private open space has been These need to be identified and corrected.
secured through the development review
process. Several hillside subdivisions, as well The status of the five major trail corri- �
as valley-floor apartment complexes, offer dors is as follows:
both natural and improved recreational facil-
,''�;: ,
ities to their residents. Utility system power `�.
,
line corridors in the City's foothills are anoth- +� �
er category of privately controlled open space.
An example of public-private partner- '
ship for the joint use of private open space is
the approximately one-acre site at the south- �
east corn.er of Stevens Creelc and De Anza �;� .'' +''"
_ ,� .
�:
����� �
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN
46
: � ____ ___ -
-- - -
I
��
OPEN SPACE� PARKS AND TRAILS 2' �
I
Strategies:
1. Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation
� Plan. Implement the recommendations
, �:���� of the Cupertino Pedestrian �
Transportation Plan to develop a City
- " - trail/pedestrian linkage between major
lo ment centers the Heart of the
emp y ,
City and major open space areas.
� 2. Trail Projects. Implement the trail
projects described in this element.
Evaluate any safety, security and privacy
� impacts and mitigations associated with
trail development. Work with affected
ing the two most heavily used parks in Santa neighborhoods in locating trails.
Clara County, Rancho San Antonio County
Park and Vasona Counry Park. A feasibility 3, Dedicated Trails or Easements. Require
study found that this project is not feasible at dedication or easements for trails, as
this time. Acquisition of right-of-way or � as their implementation, as part of "�'
easements is anticipated when the Railroad �
the development process, where appro-
goes out of service in 20 years. The corridor priate.
is designated as a proposed trail on the Trail
Linkages diagram. Should ehe railroad corri- 4. Jointi Use Agreement. Establish a Joint
dor use change, provision for a continuous Use Agreement with the Santa Clara
trail through the corridor must be included Valley Water District that sets standards '
in the new use. and implementation measures for creek '
5) MARY AVENUE �ICYCLE FOOTBRIDGE trails.
The proposed Mary Avenue Bicycle [
Footbridge links the north side of I-280 to De �e1ghborhooel And Community ;
Anza College, Memorial Park and the Oaks p
Shopping Center. It is consistent wirh the De C
Anza College Facilities Master Plan and the Cupertino's most significant open space ,
and ark resources are neighborhood parks. '
Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan. P
Implementation is scheduled for the years �ey are essential to providing convenient
2004-2005. recreational opportunities and attractive vis-
�, tas for Cupertino's families. Cupertino has
Po1►eyZ-73: Open Spaee and 1'rail aggressively pursued various ��pes of comrr�u-
Linkages nity recreational resources. Private open
Dedicate or acquire open space lands space, trails, school playing fields and sports ,
and trail linkages to connect areas and facilities offer a full-range of recreational
provide for a mare walkable community. choices. Escalating land costs and a reduc-
. ��
� � �� �
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN '
47
_ - __ _ _ _
_ i
2'JZ LAND USE�COMMUNITY DESIGN
�,�.'. �� �� ` � � � � W� may discourage some people, especially -
� - — �.
' _� '- oun children, from visitin nearb arks.
- �.:_.. � -_ Y g g Y P ..
;:- .
:. - . �, ::_=:�-
-•--� - The City of Cupertino shall continue its
t --- --- -- commitment to a responsive and �ttractive
-- - _ open space and park system by adhering to
- " � { � � the following policies.
� ,,� `ti
� � , � �, �
},
� '�'� V Policy �-74: Park Acreage
,�,
�%-
Provide parkland equal to a minimum
«__� of three acres for each 1,000 residents.
�
�� Policy 2-75: Park Walking Distance
Ensure that each household is wirhin a
half-mile walk of a neighborhood park,
or community park with neighborhood
facilities, and that the route is reason-
ably free of physical baniers, including
streets with heavy traffic. Wherever
tion in local funding means the City must possible, provide pedestrian links
consider new ways to acquire parkland, such between parks. �
as long-term joint-use agreements and devel- '
opment dedications. The City should also �olicy�-76:Pat'kVariety
reconsider the uses of all existing facilities, so Plan for park uses that provide for a
as to provide more community-oriented variety of recreational activities. �
parks. Cupertino's neighborhood parks sys-
tem serves the active and passive neighbor- Po1►cy2-77: Recreationallntensity
hood and community parks recreation needs Recognize the level of' recreational
of its residents. Table 2-B lists the existing intensity appropriate to each neighbor-
park and recreation acreage by area. hood park, so that future park planning '
can be based on the desired intensity
of use.
Accessibility �
Some areas within neighborhoods are Po��CY 2'78: PArk Minimure� Acreage �
isolated by physical barriers, including land Plan parks to be at least 3.5 acres for ',
forms, freeways, railroad tracks, or streets flexibiliry of use. The acquisition and ,
�' with heavy traffic. Accessibility is a major development of parks less than 3.5 � I
consideration in neighborhood parks. Figure acres may be considered according to '
2-L shows the neighborhoods and the 1/2 the following priorities:
mile service area radius for neighborhood
parks. The shaded service areas show physi- High Priority - Designated neighbor-
cal barriers, such as freeways, railroad tracks hoods that have no park or recreation
or stream beds. The diagram does not show areas. '
streets with heavy traffic. These busy streets
I :Af �.
�.�_�-� �",�
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN
� i
48
Z'.JO LAND USE�COMMUNITY DESIGN '
ting. Features could include paths, land use activities, public streets, and
benches, water features, picnic constructed or natural physical barriers
tables, public art, trees and gardens. or a combination of any of these. Show
They should be oriented toward the the precise boundary on the zoning
street or an activiry area where it is map.
easily accessible to the public. ,'
deemed inaccessible or Polity2-88: Resideni'ial Density
Passive areas �
unlikely to be used by the public Ranges on the Map
should not be credited toward park Recognize that residential density .
dedication. Providing public trail ranges on the General Plan Map and
connections may be given partial its legend shows the desired develop-
credit toward park dedication. ment intensity for a general area. The
actual gross dwelling-unit density may
2. Where feasible, public park and be slightly different if the properties
recreational facilities should be pro- reflect the general development char-
vided for those who live and work acter of neighboring properties.
in Cupertino.
Policy Z-89: Public and Quasi-Public
3. New residential developments qctivities
should be encouraged to blend their �
recreational facilities into the com- Allow public and quasi-public activi- �
munity at large. ties in commercial or office land use
categories with zoning and use permit
4. Park fees should be collected based review based on the following criteria: ,
on a formula that considers the
extent to which the public and/or 1 • �e proposed project must have sim-
private park space and facilities ilar building forms, population, traf-
meet the park need. fic, noise and infrastructure impacts i
as the existing land use categories. i
i
Policy2-86: Recreational Facil►i'ies Z. The proposed project must maintain y
Recognize the public benefits derived a commercial interface in commer- �
from facilities such gymnasiums, swim- cial designations by offering retail
ming pools and/or tennis courts and activities, creating a storefront
work to provide these facilities as the appearance or other design or use ,
use of school facilities is m�imized. options that are similar to commer-
cial activities. I,
� '
St�ategy: '
GEiVERAL POL0CIE5 Commercial ordinance. Amend the
Policy 2-87: Boundar'ie.s 8etween commercial zoning ordinance to allow
Land Uses public and quasi-public activities as
Base boundaries between land use clas- conditional uses.
sifications upon lot lines of established '
� � �.
�.
��� � '
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN I
49
i
�
4 � � CIRCULATION
�'� 4. Design of New Developments.
,'� . _ . .
1,� _ Encourage new commercial develop-
� %— ments to provide shared office facilities,
� �=�' � cafeterias, day-care facilities, lunch-
INCREASED USE OE PUBLIC TRAIVSIT, CA62POOL5, rooms, showers, bicycle parking, home
BICYCLING, WALKING AfVD TELECOMMUTiNG ;
offices, shuttle buses to transit facilities �
and other amenities that encourage the '
Measures to manage travel demand, I
called Transportation Systems Management use of transit, bicycling, walking or �
(TSM), are directed at reducing the number telecommuting as commute modes to �
of single-occupant vehicles (SOVs) using the work. Provide pedestrian pathways and �
circulation system during peak hour commute orient buildings to the street to encour-
periods. SOV trips represent about half of all age pedestrian activity.
the daily trips generated in Cupertino.
5. Street Space for Alternative Transpor- I
� Policy 4-2: Reduced Reliance on i'he tation. Provide space on appropriate i
Use of Single-Occupant Vehicles streets for bus tumouts, or safe and acces- i
Promote a general decrease in reliance sible bike lanes or pedestrian parhs. i
on privaCe, mostly single
6. Alternative Transportation Informa-
vehicles (SOV) by encouraging attrac- tion. Use the Cupertino Scene and
� tive alternatives. other media to provide educational
material on altematives to the SOV. ' i�
Strafegies ;
l. Alternatives to the SOV. Encourage 7, Citizen Participation. Continue to I
the use of alternatives to the SOV work with the City Bicycle/Pedestrian
including increased car-pooling, use of Advisory Committee, community !,
public transit, bicycling and walking. groups and residents to eliminate haz- �
ards and barriers to bicycle and pedes-
2. TSM Programs. Encourage TSM pro- trian transportation.
grams for employees in both the public
and private sectors by including pre-
ferred parking for carpools, providing 1° '� � ' 1( L
bus passes, encouraging compressed
workweeks, and providing incentives Cupertino is an auto-oriented, subur-
and rewards for bicycling and walking. ban city developed during the 1950s and
1960s. Local streets provide limited service
�, 3. Telecommuting, Teleconferencing and to other transportation modes. As would be
Other Electronic Communication.
expected in a(�ity designed with the auto in �'
Encourage ernployers to use the intemet mind, walking and bicycle riding currently
to reduce commute travel. Encourage represent just 7% of all trips generated in �I
schools, particularly at the college and Cupertino.
high school levels, to make m�imum The land use policies of this Plan are '
use of the intemet to limit the need to
travel to and from the campus. intended to locate trip generators and attrac-
tors closer together and thus promote walk-
�
��'�'� ��
�. � , ,
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN
50
PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLES �" / '
ing and bicycle use. In addition, the weather ,, ---�
: '' .
and terrain make Cupertino an ideal loca- -
tion to develop pedestrian and bicycle modes ^` -
1.�
of transportation.
�.
; �
� `
�_.���,-�=m.�--- o a �, 1 ��—.�--��� j
-- ti �� r -- ' � ��'
��� � � � �
` / � �� � � 1I!
A COMPREHENSIVE NETWOR6( OF PEDE51'RIAfV �
G;i
AND BICYCLE ROUTES AND FACILITIES ��? " ��
_.._
Policy4-3: Cupertino Pedestrian �= ��- '=� =-
-- � �, � �,, Y _ { i
Transportation Guidelines and the -.._y.-,,�-��� -_ ,
. .. , ,��..�;� ��:.
Cupertino Bicycle Transportation "` �
_ —� :
Plan. "
Implement the programs and proj ects
recommended in the Cupertino
Pedestrian Transportation Guidelines
and in the Cupertino Bicycle 2. Pedestrian Grid. Consider developing �
Transpareation Plan, as well as other a quarter-mile grid of safe, walk-able
programs that promote this goal. sidewalks and paths to provide pedestri-
an access among residential, shopping,
5trategies recreation and business locations. '
1. The Pedestrian Guidelines. Implement
the projects recommended in the 3• Safe Routes to School. Work with the
Pedestrian Guidelines including: School Districts to promote the Safe
Route to Schools program.
• After engineering review, and where
found to be feasible, improve safety 4• Pedestrian Time on Traffic Signals.
at selected intersections by one or With engineering review, provide addi-
more of the following: prohibit right- tional time for pedestrians to cross
streets at appropriate intersections.
turn-on-red, add time to the pedes- � �i
trian signal phase, construct a medi- Added time would be most appropriate ,
an and/ar reduce corner radii. near shopping districts, schools and sen- ,
ior citizen developments. This strategy
• Where feasible provide missing side- should be considered even if it could
walks on arterial and collector reduce the Level of Service (LOS) for
streets and on neighborhood streets automobile traffic. ,
as desired by residents.
5. Pedestrian Improvements. To enhance
• Identify a citywide pedestrian circula- walking, consider various improve-
tion grid including shortcuts, pathways ments to roadways to make them more
and bridges, where needed, to close gaps pedestrian friendly and less auto-cen-
in the pedestrian circulation system. tric. Where a median is provided, it
' •�,
�
����r� �,.
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN '
51
PUBLIC TRANSIT q"9
6. Crosswalk Marking, Medians, and ing in multi-family residential develop-
"Chokers." Following engineering ments and in commercial districts as
review, mark crosswalks with pavement required under Section 19.100.040 of
treatment scaled to the speed of traffic. the City code.
Use medians and "chokers" to narrow
the width of the street where feasible Policy 4-4:14egional7'pail .
and appropriate. Development
Continue to plan and provide for a
7. Pedestrian/Bicycle Impact Statement comprehensive system of trails and
(PBIS). Encourage all public construc- pathways consistent with regional sys-
tion and private development projects tems, including the Bay Trail, Stevens
to submit a PBIS. For projects that Creek Corridor and Ridge Trail. The .
require a TIA, the PBIS may be incor- General Alignment of the Bay Trail, as '
porated into the TIA. The impact of shown in the Association of Bay Area
the project on pedestrians and bicycles Govemments' Bay Trail planning doc-
shall be reported in terms of safety, ument, is incorporated in the General
route connectiviry, loss of existing facil- Plan by reference.
ities, adequacy of proposed facilities,
and potential adverse impact of pro- i
posed pedestrian/bicycle, programs on ` ,
automobile traffic and vice versa. ` �' �F'= °
- _� � ., , � � � � --�
f ��;, � � ��, � �; , �. ; �'�
F ' ' ��;w�
8. Implementation of tihe Bicycle Plan. ,�. �
' Implement the Bikeway Network as � ��." �
recommended in the Bicycle Plan. The ". -G-� ��
_ � ��
Network is shown in Figure 4-B. - ,
,
, ,.. .
9. Bicycle Facilxties in New Develop- � � y �
_ ..� ��� r M,:a
ments. Encourage the developers of , F - ZZ�h �'
maj or new or remodeled buildings to -;' -� ��' �
include secure interior and/or fully f� � �
weather protiected bicycle parking. ��� �; ; ����'�� ` �
`I
� q i , '�' � I
o a n �� .. . . . . . :...._:�—' ,.
- . ' 1 ' v . . . :> .:.:_ -'_. .. .
,
lO .Traffic Calming on Bicycle Routes. '
� Where feasible and appropriate, imple-
ment traffic calming on those bicycle ��BL�� ° r��1�$�� °
�' routes where automobile traffic volumes .
are low. Bicycle traffic flows best where The City of Cupertino does not operate
automobile traffic volume and speeds any public transit services. The VTA operates
are low and where there are no stop nine regular and three express bus routes serv-
signs or traffic signals to hinder through ing 128 bus stops in Cupertino. The Stevens I
traffic flow. Creek Corridar is served at 15-minute head-
ways on weelcdays and 30 minute headways in '
11.Sicycle Parking. Provide bicycle park- the evening and weekends. Most other arteri- ,
�"��
��� �. �,
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN ,
52
--:_ i
q'� � 2 CIRCULATION
Table 4-1. Level Of Service Definitioris For Signalized Intersections.
Level of Vehicle Delay Description
Service (Seconds)
A 0- 5.0 Free flow, no congestion (very little delay) '
B 5.1 - 15.0 Stable flow, limited congestion (slight delay)
C 15.1 - 25.0 Stable flow, moderate congestion (acceptable delay)
�
D 251 - 40.0 Approaching unstable flow, high congestion (tolerable delay) �
E 40.1 - 60.0 Unstable flow, near breakdown (typically unacceptable delay)
F >60.0 Forced flow, breakdown (excessive delay)
The concept of maintaining no worse
`�
than a tolerable level of congestion is impor- •'� ;��'=
��� � �
tant, not only to provide a reasonable LOS �
for motorists, but also to protect neighbor �OADWAY DESIGN THAT ACCOUNTS FOR THE
hoods from the impact of excessive through NEEDS OF MOTORISTS, PEDESTRIANS, BICYCLES
traffic. To the extent that the arterial and AND ADJACENT LAND USE '
major collector street system is operating
with limited congestion, there will be less Policy 4S: Traffit Ser'vice and Land
incentive for drivers to use local streets to Use Development
bypass areas of congestion. Maintain a_minimum LOS D for major
intersections during the moming and
Cupertino uses a computerized traffic aftemoon peak trafFic hours. Achieve ',
signal interconnect system to increase the �is standard by imposing reasonable
traffic carrying capacity of arterial streets. The limits on land use to ensure that princi-
system controls the flow at intersections to pal thoroughfares are not unduly '
favor commute traffic. Green lights are longer impacted by locally generated traffic at '
on major streets to encourage shoppers, com- peak traffic hour.
muters and workers to use those streets.
In order to accommodate development �
These policies encourage drivers to use �at furthers a unique gathering place in
the arterial street system. Cupertino discour- �e Crossroads area on Stevens Creek
ages motorists from other cities from using Boulevard, set the LOS standard for the
local streets, and, where appropriate, from f� �tersections of Stevens Creek
using collector streets, by means of stop Boulevard with De Anza Boulevard and
signs, speed humps, raised medians, diverters with Stelling Road to LOS E+. (No
and intensified enforcement of speed limits. more than an average 45 seconds of
;
delay per vehicle). The standard for the j
intersection of De Anza Boulevard at �
Bollinger Road shall also be LOS E+. '
'�. � �, '��
. ��� �� i
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN I
53
ROADWAYS `�'^
� l�
i ; �, "
��.� _
I
_ - t �,b.� �'
t "'
l
�
� �g" ti
F � 5� � � � w+..
frt _ � �� � ��r � �� � �
�n�a #� � �� � �x�� � � '
�4 �� `� ^� �� �� i
(
LOS standards may also be adjusted as to this standard are set for the intersec- �
described in Policy 4-8• tions of Stevens Creek Boulevard with �
De Anza Boulevard and with Stelling
Strafiegies Road and for the intersection of De Anza
1. Street Width Limitation. To minimize Boulevard at Bollinger Road.
the barrier effect and the negative aes-
thetics of maj or streets, limit the mid- 5•�nual LOS Analysis. Conduct a LOS
block width of De Anza Boulevard to analysis, consistent with the reporting
eight lanes requirements of the VTA, to be com-
pleted at the time of the annual ,
Z. Synchronization of Traffic Signals. General Plan review. '
Enhance the synchronization of traffic I
signals on major streets. 6. Intersection Capacity Improvements.
Make capacity improvements as needed
3. Allocation of Non-residential Devel- to maintain Level of Service policies.
opment. In order to maintain a desired (DeAnza Boulevard and Homestead
level of transportation system capacity, Road and Stelling Road at McClellan
the city's remaining non-residential Road.)
development potential shall be pooled
and reallocated according to the city's 7• Enhanced Level of Service. Strive to
development priority tables as shown in enhance the intersection Levels of
the Land Use Element of this Plan. Service where feasible.
v
4. Citywide Transportation Improvement �����Y'�'���raffi'icSer..v_icean� _
Plan. Carry out a citywide transportation Pedest�'ians Needs
improvement plan to accommodate Balance the needs of pedeserians with ��
peak hour traffic flows on arterial streets desired traffic service. Where neces-
and maj or collector streets at a minimum sary and appropriate, allow a lowered i
of LOS D. If feasible, the Plan should LOS standard to better accommodate '
maintain the LOS higher than level D. pedestrians on major streets and at spe- '
However, as described above, exceptions cific intersections. ,,�
,A�. �
�� ,
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN '
54
4� 14 CIRCULATION
Str'ategy: 2. Rural Road Improvement Standards.
Traffic Signal Walk Times. This strate- Identify candidate rural roads and devel-
gy is described in Policy 4-3. Added time op specific street improvement stan-
on walk signs would be most appropriate dards that preserve the rural character of
near shopping districts, schools and sen- these streets. Rural roads would typical- I
ior citizen developments. ly feature natural landscaping, no side-
walks and narrow unpaved shoulders.
Policy4 RoadwayPlans that
� Cotnplemenf the IVeeds ofi4djacent 3. Semi-Rural Road Improvement
Land Use Standards. Identify candidate semi-rural .
roads where curb and gutter improve-
Design roadways based on efficient ments, and no sidewalks, are appropriate.
alignments, appropriate number and
widths of trafFic lanes, inclusion of q,, Urban Road Improvement Standards. I
medians, parking and bicycle lanes and Develop urban improvement standards I �
the suitable width and location of side- for arterials such as Stevens Creek and
walks as needed to support the adja- De Anza Boulevards. In these areas,
cent properties. standards may include wide sidewalks
with appropriate street fumiture.
In addition, design the local streets to
satisfy the aesthetic requirements of the 5. Suburban Road Improvement '
area served. In general, the aesthetics of Standards. Develop suburban road ,
a street will be improved if it can be improvement standards for all streets
narrower rather than wider, include sig- not designated as rural, semi-rural nor
nificant landscaping with shade trees, in the Crossroads Area.
and provide safe and convenient places
for people to bicycle and walk. Details 6. Intersection Design. Survey intersec- ',
of design, such as provision of vertical tions to ensure that the roadway align- �I
curbs and minimum corner radii, are to ments are as efficient as possible. Where
be considered desirable. Design details feasible and appropriate, redesign and
should be developed in the City's road rebuild those intersections where
improvement standards. improvements would upgrade traffic �
flow and pedestrian and bicycle con- ''
St'rai'egies venience and safety. ',
1. Road Improvement Standards. Develop
the City's road improvement standards Too many driveways may impede traffic '
to include consideration of service to flow on l�usy streets because drivers can
traffic, bicycles and pedestrians, as well indiscriminately enter the travel lanes at
as the embodiment of aesthetically pleas- multiple locations. Landscaping themes i
ing design features, like trees. along the street frontage maintain a stronger �
Improvement standards shall also con- visual continuity with fewer curb cuts while ',
sider the urban, suburban and rural envi- also improving service for bicyclists and '�,
ronments found within the Ciry. pedestrians. '
�
��� �'� �!
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN '
55
i
_ _ FLOOD �A�S 6-25
s�rategies FLOOD WdaZARDS
_ 1. Communication Methods. Use the Floods are surface hydrological hazards
local TV channel, the Internet and that can have a significant, and sometimes,
other communication methods to long lasting effect on a comrnunity. They can ,
transmit information to the citizenry. cause substantial property damage, and �
sometimes loss of life. Nationally, annual
2. Public Information Office. Activate losses from floods generally exceed losses
the Public Information Office either in from other natural disasters.
the emergency Operations Center or in
City Hall as quickly as possible. Floods can originate from various
sources: heavy rainstorms, landslides and/or
Policy6-40: Community dam failure. Regardless of their source, their
Pr'epar'edness impacts on a community can be devastating.
Support the CERT program to ensure Precautionary measures must be taken and
the development of neighborhood preventive measures must be in place to pre-
based emergency preparedness vent and/or minimize potential damages
throughout the City. Encourage coop- related to floods.
eration with CERTs in other cities.
; _ ... ,�
� _ --- � � ;-�"°==— -- �
Accessibility to IViedical Facilities ` `%� ,
� ;
An earthquake of significant magni PR�TECTION FROM RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH j
tude could temporarily isolate Cupertino FLOODS
� from major full-service hospitals (Figure 6- '
F). City personnel, p
aramedics and local Policy 6-42: Evacuut'ion Map
physicians will have to administer first aid Prepare and update periodically an
until access to the major full-service hospi- evacuation map for the flood hazard '
tals is reestablished. areas and distribute it to the general �
public.
Policy 6-41: Disaster Med�sal ,
Response Policy 6-43. Flood lnsurance Map i
Coordinate with local emergency clin- Rafes i
ics to provide disaster medical Ensure that FEMA Flood Insurance ,,
response. Coordinate with the CERTs Rate Maps are developed for the City !,
throughout the City to ensure that of Cupertino. I
they are �3repared to provide medical _ �
care at the neighborhood level. �
Flood Hazards frorn Rainstorms
5trafegyt Rain related floods are seasonal. They
Memorandum of Understanding. are the most common type of floods, and
Develop a Memorandum of Under- usually occur during those periods of extend-
standing with local emergency clincs. ed heavy rainfall. One of the contributory �i
conditions to flooding in the urban environ- !
:�, '
���� �
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN
i
56
6 ' 2� HEALTH SL SAFET Y
o �enrra/ Expw
y W
/n �ersr a � P o � h �� � � H y �� 10 � "
28p F � � X 5t a'� e
i Q w ,�et
w ��
Clinlc ' ,
Stevens Creek Blvd '
�
v � I
y �
v F � i
� '�° m a
m � �n ,� `°
N � �
C
Q '71
N % d
LEGEND °
� Hospitals �3� '
Potential �
Barriers
� City of I�
Cupertino
Figure 6-F. Areas Potentially Isoluta,ble in d Seismic Emergency. I
I
ment is the reduced percolation potential of slide. If appropriate spillways are not provid- I
the land, caused by increased development ed to relieve the pressure being exerted on
and/or paving. During extended periods of the blockage, it could collapse, causing large -,
heavy rainfall the open/undeveloped lands volumes of water to precipitate down the '
are insufficient to absarb the rainfall and ravine, causing injuries to people and/or ',
become saturated. Once the soils are saturat- damaging property. Landslides can also cre-
ed rainfall will sheet flow toward the lower ate floods by falling into a dam and/or reser- '
elevations, seeking available outlets. If an voir displacing large volumes of water and I
adequate storm drainage system is not in spilling into the adjacent areas. Such land-
place to dispose of the surface runoff, the end slides can also create seiches (the sloshing i
result of the excessive runoff will be floods. action within an enclosed or semi-enclosed '
body of water), which in turn can create ''
large waves topping the dams and flooding
Flood Hazards From Landslides downstream, causing property damage and
Landslides can generate floods by creat- injury to developments and residents down- ',
ing water basins. In Cupertino a landslide stream. Fortunately, the watersheds in this
could occur within a steep ravine at the area are relatiyel�'small, so the risk of floods
fringes of the foothills in the more moun- caused by landslides is minimal. I
tainous terrain of the Urban Service Area '
boundary. In the event such a landslide were Flood 1-I�zaPds Fpom D�iTt Failui'e '
to occur in a ravine serving a relatively large ,
watershed, the natural flow of water would Flooding resulting from dam failure is yet '
be blocked off and water would collect another hydrological hazard. The largest body '
behind the blockage created by the land- of water within the area is the Stevens Creek
� � '
��� � , '�,
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN '
57
- - -- - I
FLOOD HAZARDS U' Z �
I� ��� �� sides or causing displacement_ of a large
� amount of stored water. And while the com-
bination of rainstorm related flood and a land-
slide is not totally improbable, the likelihood
of a seismic event thae could rupture a dam
;�� �;����,�' � also occurring at rize same time is remote.
�N�;��� � ���� .f�r.� �e
�' _ _
� ,_
, ., �flfi'�5$i'IACtlii'�
With the exception of some the older
areas of the planning area, such as Monta
Reservoir. Stevens Creek Dam meets current Vista, the City is served by a storm drainage
dam safety standards and the probability of its system to accommodate a 10-year flood, and
failure is minimal. Causes for dam failure are the City now requires that all new develop-
numerous. They include inadequate design, ment adhere to this standard. In addition,
construction deficiencies and sometimes poor the City proposes to upgrade the key parts of
underlying foundation conditions. the older system through a long-term capital
improvement program, including a proj ect Co
Po1►cy 6-44: Emet'gency Response to specifically provide a storm drain system for
Dam F'ailure the Monta Vista area.
Ensure that Cupertino is prepared to � City has not studied in detail the I
__ . respond to a potential dam failure. carrying capacity of the existing system, but �I
�� � S � pp �� it is estimated that it could accommodate the ''
9Y ' runoff from a 10-year to a 40-year flood,
1. Emergency and Evacuation Plan. although there would be some overflow that
Maintain a dam emergency and evacu- � run along the street gutters but ulti- '�,
ation plan. mately dissipate into the major storm chan- I
nels and creeks able to accommodate a 100-
Z. Emergency Response to Dam Failure. year storm. Heavier storms may cause some
Coordinate dam-related evacuation {�ooding of yards, but flooding of buildings
plans with the City of Sunnyvale to � be extremely unlikely. As previously
ensure that traffic management between mentioned, there are a few areas of the City, '
the two cities facilitates life safety. such as Old Monta Vista and older areas next
to the foothills, that are not protected by a '
IUlultiple Occurre��ces storm drainage system. These areas would be
subjected to flooding, but it��s difficult, if r-_ot
Floods whether related to rainstorms, impossible, to predict the location and
landslides or dam failure are independent extent of the effect of the flooding in these ',
events, but could also occur simultaneously. smaller isolated areas. The extent of proper- �
For example, a landslide could occur during a ry damage caused by flooding in these areas I
flood caused by a heavy rainstorm as a result would be commensurate to the intensity of '
of the land becoming saturated, possibly the flooding, but the risk of loss of life is vir- '
weakening the structural integrity of the hill- tually non-existent. '
`�:
��� �,
CIT'Y OF CiTPERTINO GENERAL PLAN
I
58
_ __ _ _ s
6�� � HEALTH & SAFETY
Sediment deposits increase flood risks Flood risks within Cupertino and its
because they clog the drainage system as well planning area are relatively low. There are a
as the natural percolation function of the number of water storage tanks existing in the
streambeds, which replenish the underground hillside areas (see Figure 6-G) that have the
water table. Sediment is caused by natural potential to inflict property losses and injuries i
erosion as well as erosion induced by develop- to residents of homes existing in their prox- '
ment, mostly in the hillsides. Removing sedi- imity in the event of failure. However, the
ment from rhe drain lines is a major expense probabiliry of their failure is considered to be
to the City. Preventive measures, such as the very low; consequently, they are considered to
City's Residential Hillside Ordinance require be a minimal risk. The largest body of water
private hillside construction to install erosion Within the area is the Stevens Creek
control measures on all cut-and-fill slopes, Reservoir, and the probability of its failure is
including roadways, driveways, and house minimal. Figure 6-G depicts the extent of the
pads, help to minimize the problem. �undation potential resulting from the failure
of made-made water storage facilities.
Most water-storage facilities shown in
Figure 6-G are designed to withstand ground Flood PIaIn
shaking. If the magnitude of ground shaking
was not previously assessed or if the water Stevens Creek and its streamside are I
facilities were designed before new standards among the natural elements that have the �I
were developed, their structural integrity most influence on Cupertino's character.
should be assessed. The City owns three The creek strongly defines the boundary
tanks, but they are being leased to the San between the urban and rural parts of the i .� :; ',
Jose Water Company. The San Jose Water . City, extends a note of unspoiled beauty into
Company is responsible for the maintenance the heart of the developed valley floor and
and safety of the tanks. The City should work gives many residents and visitors a space for '
closely with the owners of other tanks and the play, relaYation or study of the creek's plant
San Jose Water Company to ensure that the and animal life. Other creeks traversing the I
structural ineegriry of all the tanks is main- Ciry are Permanente Creek, Regnart Creek ,
tained in accordance with the latest seismic and Calabazas Creek. These creeks collect ,
engineering standards and that an evaluation surface runoff and channel it to the Bay.
of the possible areas of flooding be conducted. However, they also pose potential flooding
rislcs should their levees be topped as a result
of heavy runoff.
Acceptable Level of Risk
Land uses in the flood plain should
An acce table level of risk is the chance �.ti " '
P allow the puu� c access to-the creek, but
one is willing to accept weighed against the materials that would restrict the free flow of �
probabiliry of the occurrence of an event that the creek waters or significantly disturb the �
may cause property loss or injury. It is a con- riparian environment should be prohibited.
scious decision that takes into account the I
cost/benefit ratio of risk reduction. Risk The Santa Clara Valley Water District
reduction is proportionally related to cost, the and the City of Cupertino are actively '
lower the risk, the greater the cost. involved in programs to minimize the risk of
�� 9.?1 „
�� / ��
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN
59
� 6-29 `
FLOOD HnznxDs
-. flooding. The City developed a flood plain po�]�y 6-45: E'xis�ing Uses in �he
�� land use policy for the non-urbanized flood Flood Pla►n
plain of Stevens Creek south of Stevens Allow commercial and recreational
Creek Boulevard. This ensures the preserva-
tion of the 100-year flood plain and the pro- uses that are now exclusively within
tection of the riparian corridor along this the flood plain to remain in their pres-
portion of Stevens Creek. ent use or to be used for agriculture.
The City and the Water District devel- �olicy 6-46: IVew C'onstruction in
oped a flood management program for the ��ood Plains
flood plain of Stevens Creek between Adopt stringent land use, zoning and
Interstate 280 and Stevens Creek Boulevard. building code regulations limiting new
The strategy is to keep the natural environ- construction in the already urbanized
ment of Stevens Creek, although structural flood hazard areas recognized by the
improvement may be necessary to protect Federal Flood Insurance Administrator.
properties from a 100-year flood. The major-
ity of the people living in the Phar Lap Drive Si'rategies:
and Creston neighborhoods have a high 1. Finish Floor Level. Install the first floor
flood risk, but they are partially covered by finish level of all habitable space of new
the Federal Flood Insurance Program. construction above the inundation
level of a projected 100-year flood.
The Santa Clara Water District has
now completed the construction of the 2. Description of Flood Zone Regulation.
� Calabazas Creek Project, which included the Publish a description of flood zone reg-
construction of a conduit across Interstate ulations and a map of potential flood
280 to reduce the barrier effect created by hazard areas in the Cupertino Scene. '
the freeway itself that was built across the '
natural flood plain. The scope of the project Policy 6-47: Dwellings in nlafu►'al ',
also included improvements that should also Flood Pla►n '�,
minimize the flooding problems in the Miller Regulate closely all types of habitable �'
Avenue area. development in natural flood plains.
This includes prohibiting fill materials
The watersheds in the Santa Cruz and obstructions that may increase ,
Mountain Range feed into four majar flood potential downstream or modify
streambeds that cross the City: Permanente the natural riparian corridors.
Creek, Stevens Creek, Regnart Creek,
Calabazas Creek. Figure �-H shows the po���y �_��; ��/►��de Grading '
streambed locations and the extent of a 100- Restrict the extent and timing o£ hill- '
year flood, which has a one percent chance
side grading operation to April through I
of occurring during any given year. The 100- October. Require performance bonds
year flood is the standard design flood during the remaining time to guarantee I
accepted by the City, the Santa Clara Valley the repair of any erosion damage. All
Water District and federal agencies. graded slopes must be planted as soon '
as practical after grading is complete.
�: '
� �
��
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN l
60
_
-_ - - =- - � �
_
6 'JO HEALTH SL SAFETY j
Facility Fc�ilures
�
Sunnyvale
��. � �� �a - � � - � � �
Los Alros = z ` � r
� �
� �-5-�--' f r� 4 ''-'� l �l NPr��ho � norta-�`�T' - ��p � [ ;;t � �. �'_. .� � 1
� ° I
� � � ` "` ' � ' � �.,� ' � �� ` � � t P
0
��� Y
✓ � �
� � � { _ , .� ' ' "� ; R
,� � 4 �� � �� �,� ��� 0+30 Mlp. � � ����OC nve 0 �
� ��` Cristo �Rey Tank `� ..., � ; � i � � � I
j �,,2 Mil. Gal. � � I
� m.-" ProposedTank � , � MannDriveTank � � �
� �� v 61.3 Acre Feet m v 1 Mil. Gal. ¢ s LL
i w � sanra cla,a
� �s 20 Mil. Gal. € v ° ei � < o ,
♦-- o L !=�' G c" 3
�J� �-� �__ � � � " STEVENS CPEEK BLVO
� �s'� d d�VossAve.Pond F 0+15Min. ��
}� �i ` �8-70 Acre Feet � ,� � �
i � o '� '�. ��'" � ' -
/r ' = y w �W (
° Mercedes Tanks. � � McCLELLAN �� > � e
� POAD �
e i(2) 2 Mil. Gal. ► �� `� g � a
s
i i 12.�2 Acre Feet i �`' o --- �
I --- � _ �
--- � m
I ._ .'_'7���� tu. m B` RO �,.
4MiI.Ga.e �,
e
� � � j �
� i --' � Sanlose
� �\ �� '������� � ReglinTanks �
! '�. - , 20 MiL GaL � LEGEND
I '� Reglin Canyon Tank �
I � - � 0.76 MiL Gal f flAINO " p�,,, �-r--�- Flood Limit Line
�- --- - t,, i ��/ RainbowsEnd —� !
I �� _ � ��1Tank \! Naturel or Man-Made Water Course
L/ C . ` J � �� � �� 0.30 MiL Gal �---� City Boundary
� ' � I --J
Stevens Cree ��; �� � PPOSPER POAO � Urban Service Area Boundary
J � Reservoir � �� Reglin!-IeightsTank �'� � �
3700 Acre Feeta M�1. Gal. saTar�gQ —' Sphere of Influence
1 Bil. 20�-MiL Gal J i --° Boundary Agreement Line ',
� I � i i_ � Unincorporated Areas '
.! - �
Note: Flood inundation area for failure ;
of Stevens Creek Reservoir is based upon ��
maximum 3700 acre feet storage capacity. I
Figure 6-CJ. Extent o f F`�ooding as u, Result o f o 0.5 1 Mlle i
Fuilure of Man-Mcrde Water Stordge o,000 �oo0 3000Fee[ ;�y
Fucilities. 0 500 1000Meters -
1 existin water stora e facilities
-: Sfabilit of Existin of al g g
��1►cy G 4� y 9
Water Sfiorage Facilities and related improvements, such as: dis-
Assure the structural integrity of water tribution lines, connections and other
v
storage facilities. system-components. ,
Sgrategy (+�OISE POLLIlT'IOnI ''
Coordination with other Agencies.
Work closely with the San Jose Water Freedom from excessive noise is a major
Company and owners of other water contributor to a high quality of life. This sec-
storage facilities to develop and imple- tion gives a policy framework for guiding
`� ment a program to monitor the stability �ture land use and urban design decisions and ,
>��
�� . ��.
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN
61 I
- NOISE POLLUTION 6'J � �
t 100-Year Flood
� ' I Los Alros $unn vale
�� �� I y HoMeshno aono ( � �� �
! , ' 1 � � ' � � aR� 1 .
0 � \ �`O�� �F / ;
` ����d `. � `— -1 � I f � 100-Year Flood � AvE
— � 1v �' ..� es _ f ���.
I �" � a ° Contained In � san�c�Ta
I `� , � �� � � Channel LL
.` � t� � o ..:
�� o �
a
" LL '� STEVENS CflEEK BLVO
� ,a�i��� ., �� �.. _ �
� L� � ,., � ;` � ., ��
� / !` ,0�
, ���i I — --� �7 . McCLELLAN � �� w ��' I
� e
� . , RoAO �, � �, � a >
t s ��,,:' � �
� � � ° - (.+ ' � �
----� i �� _ �
� � BOLLIN6ER flD
� "_ � -I���� �e �/ / SQRIOSE
G I
� � � , ,': ` Q`' : 100-Year Flood �
I � ,� b�� Contained In Channel
� 1 �Y'�� U PAINB OflNE ( ,` •
I _"______ � .�... +�� �w y �:
y
( / � � �.� LEGEND
� J . � � —r��
��.r �' � Flood Limit Line for a
��
I SfeventGeek � �� PR05PECTNOA ���� �� Year"Event �
Ferervo4 � V�
J � ,�� Natural or Man-Made
�t i
/� �. Sarawga Water Course
/� City Boundary
; - i C_=--= -�
� �� i ---- UrbanServiceAreaBoundary '
— — Sphere of Influence '
--- BoundaryAgreementLine
�� Unincorporated Areas '
Note: Detailed Maps of 100-Year Flood '
EventAre Available at Ciry Hall
0 0.5 7 Mlle ..
Figure 6-H. Extent of Flooding as u result of a "100-Year' Flood. o,� Zooa 3000Fee�
�
' 0 500 1000 Mecers
�
contains a system of control and dbatement ety of factors, some independent of the noise
measures to protect residents from exposure to source itsel£ Time of day, bd�kground sound
excessive or unacceptable noise levels. level, the listener's activity and surrounding
land use can all influence the degree to
The noise environment is an accumu- which a particular sound is perceived as
lation of many different sources, ranging annoying. Value judgments also enter into '
from common machinery to the maj or tolerance for urban sound levels. Most peo-
source, street and freeway traffic. The.degree ple tolerate e�ergency sirens and loud lawn-
to which noise is irritating depends on a vari- mowers because they represent necessary
� ����� �' ` �
CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN '
62
_
i
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY HALL
1�3�0 Tt�RRE f1VEN�UE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
(408) 777 33(�8 • FAX {4O8) 777 3333 • plannin�@cu�ertino.or�
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. Agenda Date: May 24, 2011
Applications: U-2011-03, ASA-2011-04
Applicant: Edgar Elliott (Bay Club)
Owner: Sear & Roebuck Co.
Location: 10101 N. Wolfe Road (APN 316-20-080)
APPLICATION SUMMARY:
1. Use Permit (U-2011-03) to allow a new health club to open at 5:30 a.m. on weekdays and at
6:30 a.m. on weekends.
2. Architectural and Site Approval (ASA-2011-04) for fa�ade, landscaping, parking lot, and
sidewalk enhancements, including a new trash enclosure to service an on-site cafe, inside a
new health club facility.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
Approve the Use Permit (U-2011-03) and Architectural and Site Approval (ASA-2011-04) in
accordance with the model resolutions.
PROJECT DATA:
*The portion of the mall property that is owned by Sears
General Plan Designation Commercial/Office/Residential
Specific Plan Heart of the City (East)/South Vallco Master Plan Area
Zoning Designation P (Planned Development)
Environmental Assessment Categorically Exempt
Lot Size 742,725 square feet/17.05 acres (net)*
Existing Mall (s.f.) 1,202,350 square feet
Existing Sears (s.f.) 257,548 square feet
Proposed Health Club (s.f.) 66,207 square feet
Proposed Sears (s.f.) 191,341 square feet
Existing Parking Stalls (Mall) 4,886 spaces
Required Parking Stalls 4,848 required (1/248 s.f. per Mall Master Use Permit)
Building Height No change
BACKGROUND:
Project Location and Surrounding Uses
The project site is located at the northwest corner of N. Wolfe Road and Stevens Creek
Boulevard at the Vallco Shopping Mall. The proposed project will convert approximately 26%
of the existing Sears building into a health club. The proposed health club (Bay Club) is owned
63
ASA-2011-04, U-2011-03 Bay Club (Western Athletic Club) May 24, 2011
Page 2
and operated by Western Athletic Clubs, a luxury health club chain with nine clubs located in
the Bay Area (i.e., Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties).
The surrounding land uses to the north include the AMC theatres, Macy's and the Vallco Mall.
Commercial uses, such as the Marketplace Center, the United Furniture center and a gas station
are located across Stevens Creek Boulevard to the south. The Portal Plaza center borders the
project site to the west, and the Metropolitan Condominiums, Menlo Equities office complex
and the Rose Bowl development are located across N. Wolfe Road to the east.
FIGURE 1
,; Property line
� - Parking lot area of work
. � Int./ext. bldg area of work
on first level
� Public ROW area of work
DISCUSSION:
Project Description
The proposed Bay Club will occupy approximately 26% of the floor area of the Sears building.
Sears will occupy the remaining 74% of the building space. In addition to the typical exercise
and sports activities, the proposed club will also include the following functions:
Use Area
Cafe (open to the public) 3,600 s.f.
Pro Shop (open to the public) 1,040 s.f.
Da S a(o en to the ublic) 2,520 s.f.
Nail Salon (open to the public) 520 s.f.
On-site Child care (for members onl ) 950 s.f.
Teen Center (for members onl ) 2,910 s.f.
Exterior Building F� Site Improvements
In addition to interior tenant improvements and land use changes, the project also proposes to
following exterior and site improvements:
64
ASA-2011-04, U-2011-03 Bay Club (Western Athletic Club) May 24, 2011
Page 3
➢ Comprehensive exterior fa�ade improvements (along the portion of the Bay Club's building
frontage)
➢ Parking lot improvements (resurfacing and re-striping of parking spaces, enhancing the
parking lot pedestrian walkways and landscaping)
➢ Public sidewalk and pedestrian scale lighting enhancements along the Stevens Creek
Boulevard street frontage
Hours of Operation
The General Commercial (CG) Ordinance allows commercial businesses to be open outside of
regular business hours (7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.) with a Conditional Use Permit. Western Athletic
Clubs states that they expect the busiest times of the day to be early in the morning, during the
lunch hour and again during the evening. Consequently, in order to allow their members the
ability to use the facility prior to the start of the workday, the applicant is requesting for a 5:30
a.m. opening time on weekday and a 6:30 a.m. opening time on weekends for the facility.
Traffic, Parking and Circulation Analysis
A traffic analysis was prepared the City's traffic consultant, Fehr and Peers, to study the effect of
the traffic generated by the proposed sports club (see Attachment 2). A focused traffic analysis
was prepared since the Sears store generates a minimal amount of traffic during the morning
commute time; however, the health club generates 77 additional A.M. peak hour trips. Since both
uses generate similar amounts of traffic during the evening commute period, a complete traffic
analysis was not required. The traffic analysis concludes that the overall impact to the
intersections studied is minimal and no traffic mitigation is required or recommended.
Parking spaces at the mall are shared by all of the mall uses. The Vallco Shopping Mall has
approximately 1,202,350 square feet of cumulative building area and about 4,886 total parking
spaces. The City's original approval for the mall prescribed a parlcing ratio of 1 space per 248
square foot for the mall or 4,849 spaces. The approved parking ratio was developed to
accommodate all allowable uses including stores, restaurants, movie theaters, and fitness clubs.
If all the parking stalls at the mall are considered, their currently is a surplus of 37 parking
spaces.
The mall currently has 999,099 square feet of occupied space (or an occupancy rate of 83 percent).
Field observations show that currently there are ample available parking spaces at the mall,
including the parking areas in the immediately vicinity of the Bay Club site. Furthermore, Bay
Club will provide site improvements that will add approximately 80 parking spaces.
The project satisfies the City's requirements in terms of the required number of vehicular stalls;
and dimensions for parking stalls and drive aisles. The proposed project will also add 30 bicycle
parking racks in this area of the mall.
Building Architecture
The proposed fa�ade improvements consist of a minimalistic and modern architectural theme.
New building materials are introduced to provide additional texture and visual interest, such as
aluminum panels at the street level and white integral color stucco panels with aluminum
reveals. Additionally, in order to visually differentiate the Sears fa�ade from the Bay Club
fa�ade, a green screen is proposed with climbing vines on both the east and the south elevations
of the building (see Plan Set).
65
ASA-2011-04, U-2011-03 Bay Club (Western Athletic Club) May 24, 2011
Page 4
The cafe proposed at the street level is located in the south east corner of the building. It will
have large openings on both the sides of the building that open on to the sidewalk activating the
street level and adding interest to the corner.
Site Improvements and Landscaping
The project proposes to enhance two parking areas (identified in Figure 1 above) immediately
east and south of the building. A new trash enclosure, an accessible path of travel and tree wells
are being added to the east parlcing lot along Wolfe Road while an accessible path of travel, tree
wells and landscape islands are being added to the south parlcing lot along Stevens Creek
Boulevard. The project will include the repaving and restriping of the currently unimproved area
at the intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Wolfe Road.
The applicant proposes to plant 110 low and medium water use 24-inch box trees in new tree
wells and shrubs in some of the existing landscape islands in the parking lot.
The project also proposes a new sidewalk along the Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage from the
driveway along Stevens Creek Boulevard to the existing construction fencing on site (identified
in Figure 1 above) consistent with the requirements of the Heart of the City Specific Plan. The
sidewalk will be widened to six (6) feet and detached from the curb. Freestanding pedestrian
scale lighting is proposed near the sidewalk to illuminate the path.
Other Departments' Review
The City's Public Works Department, Building Division, the Santa Clara County Fire
Department, and the Cupertino Sanitary District reviewed the project and have no objections to
the project. Their pre-hearing comments have been incorporated as conditions of approval.
Environmental Assessment
The project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per
sections 15301, (Interior/exterior alterations, demolition of small commercial structures), 15304
(Minor alterations to land), and 15332 (Infill development) of the CEQA Guidelines.
Prepared by: Piu Ghosh, Associate Planner
Reviewed by: Approved by:
Gary Chao Aarti Shrivastava
City Planner Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1. Model Resolutions
Attachment 2: Focused Traffic Analysis by Fehr and Peers for Bay Club Cupertino
Attachment 3. Plan Set
66
Attachment 1
U-2011-03
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A NEW HEALTH CLUB TO OPEN AT 5:30 A.M. ON
WEEKDAYS AND 6:30 A.M. ON WEEKENDS LOCATED AT 10101 N. WOLFE ROAD
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: U-2011-03
Applicant: Western Athletic Club
Property Owner: Sears Roebuck & Company
Location: 10101 N. Wolfe Road (APN: 316 20 080)
SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use
Permit as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of
the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to
the application; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application:
a) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general
welfare, or convenience;
b) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino
Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of the City's zoning ordinances.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this
matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 2
thereof, the application for a Use Permit, Application no. U-2011-03 is hereby approved, and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are
based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. U-2011-03 as set forth
in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of May 24, 2011, and are incorporated by reference
as though fully set forth herein.
67
Resolution No. U-2011-03 May 24, 2011
Page-2-
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
This approval is based on Exhibits titled "Bay Club Cupertino, Use Permit Application, 10101 N
Wolfe Road" prepared by Form 4 Architecture, Inc. dated 3-15-2011 consisting of pages A0.0 -
A0.12, C1.0, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution.
2. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS
The conditions of approval contained in file no. ASA-2011-04 shall be applicable to this approval.
3. HOURS OF OPERATION
The applicant is approved for the following hours of operation:
Monday - Friday: 5:30 a.m. -11:00 p.m.
Saturday - Sunday: 6:30 a.m. -11:00 p.m.
4. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS
The applicant is responsible to consult with other agencies with regard to the proposed project for
additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may
invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department.
5. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of
such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby
further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If
you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of
Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS
The conditions of approval contained in file no. ASA-2011-04 shall be applicable to this approval.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of May, 2011, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission
of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chair
Director of Community Development Cupertino Planning Commission
G: � Planning � PDREPORT � RES � 2011 � U-2011-03 res.doc
68
ASA-2011-04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL FOR FA�ADE, LANDSCAPING,
PARKING LOT AND SIDEWALK ENHANCEMENTS, INCLUDING A NEW TRASH ENCLOSURE
TO SERVICE AN ON-SITE CAFE INSIDE A NEW HEALTH CLUB FACILITY LOCATED AT 10101
N. WOLFE ROAD.
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: ASA-2011-04
Applicant: Western Athletic Club
Property Owner: Sears Roebuck Company
Location: 10101 N. Wolfe Road (APN: 316 20 080)
SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an
Architectural and Site Approval as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of
the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to
the application; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application:
1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general
welfare, or convenience;
2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 19.134, Architectural and Site Review, of
the Cupertino Municipal Code, the General Plan, any specific plan, zoning ordinances, applicable
planned development permit, conditional use permits, variances, subdivision maps or other
entitlements to use which regulate the subject property including, but not limited to, adherence to
the following specific criteria:
a) Design harmony between new and existing buildings have been preserved and the materials,
textures and colors of new buildings harmonize with adjacent development with design and
color schemes, and with the future character of the neighborhood and purposes of the zone in
which it is situated. The location, height and materials of hedges and screen planting
harmonize with adjacent development. Unsightly storage areas, utility installations and
unsightly elements of parlcing lots have been concealed. Ground cover or various types of
pavements have been used to prevent dust and erosion, and the unnecessary destruction of
G: � Planning � PDREPORT � RES � 2011 �ASA-2011-04 res.doc
69
Resolution No. ASA-2011-04 May 24, 2011
Page-2-
existing healthy trees have been avoided. Lighting for development is adequate to meet
safety requirements as specified by the engineering and building departments, and shielding
to adjoining property owners.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this
matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 2
thereof, the application for an Architectural and Site Approval, Application no. ASA-2011-04 is hereby
approved, and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are
based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no.(s) ASA-2011-04 as set
forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of May 24, 2011, and are incorporated by
reference as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
This approval is based on Exhibits titled "Bay Club Cupertino, Use Permit Application, 10101 N
Wolfe Road" prepared by Form 4 Architecture, Inc. dated 3-15-2011 consisting of pages A0.0 -
A0.12, C1.0, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution.
2. ACCURACY OF PROTECT PLANS
The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but
not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square
footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any
property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review.
3. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS
The conditions of approval contained in file no. U-2011-03 shall be applicable to this approval.
4. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Architectural and Site Approval is granted to for fa�ade, landscaping, parking lot and sidewalk
enhancements, including a new trash enclosure to service an on-site cafe inside a new health club
facility located inside the Sears store.
The Planning Commission shall review amendments to the project considered major by the
Director of Community Development.
5. PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENTS
Parking lot improvements as shown on the plans shall be completed, to the satisfaction of the
Director of Community Development, prior to final occupancy.
6. ACCESSIBLE PATHWAYS
The final location and design of the accessible pathways shall be reviewed and approved by the
Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits.
70
Resolution No. ASA-2011-04 May 24, 2011
Page-3-
7. TRASH ENCLOSURE
The final design of the trash enclosure shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of
Community Development prior to issuance of building permits.
8. SIGNAGE
Signage is not approved with this Architectural and Site Approval application. Signage shall
conform to the City Sign Ordinance (Title 17 of the Cupertino Municipal Code) and Heart of the
City Specific Plan.
9. SIGN PROGRAM
Any signage proposed for this use must be in conformance with the Vallco Shopping Mall's
Master Sign Program. If needed, the sign program shall be reviewed and approved by the
Director of Community Development.
10. SCREENING
All new mechanical and other equipment on the building or on the site shall be screened so they
are not visible from public street areas or adjoining developments. Screening materials/colors
shall match building features and materials. The height of the screening shall be taller than the
height of the mechanical equipment that it is designed to screen. The location of equipment and
necessary screening shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development
prior to issuance of building permits.
11. TRASH AND DELIVERY ACTIVITIES
A detailed refuse and truck delivery plan shall be prepared by the applicant. The plan shall
specify locations of trash facilities, refuse pick up schedules and truck delivery schedules and
routes. All trash facilities must be screened and enclosed to the satisfaction of the Director of
Community Development. The final plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval
prior to issuance of building permits.
12. TREE PROTECTION
Prior to building permit issuance, construction, grading and all associated plans shall be reviewed
by the City's Consulting Arborist to ensure that the design of the detached sidewalk and
accessible pathways is such that they are installed at grade to minimize impacts. The City's
consulting arborist shall verify that the tree protection measures are in place prior to
construction/demolition. A list of the tree protection measures shall be placed in the construction
plan set and posted on tree protection fences. A report ascertaining the good health of the trees
mentioned above shall be provided prior to issuance of final occupancy.
13. LANDSCAPE PROTECT SUBMITTAL
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a full landscape project submittal
per section 14.15.040 of the Landscaping Ordinance. The Water-Efficient Design Checklist
(Appendix A of Chapter 14.15), Landscape and Irrigation Design Plans, and Water Budget
Calculations shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Community
Development prior to issuance of building permits.
14. LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION REPORT
The project is subject to all provisions delineated in the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter
14.15). A landscape installation audit shall be conducted by a certified landscape professional
71
Resolution No. ASA-2011-04 May 24, 2011
Page-4-
after the landscaping and irrigation system have been installed. The findings of the assessment
shall be consolidated into a landscape installation report.
The landscape installation report shall include, but is not limited to: inspection to confirm that the
landscaping and irrigation system are installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design
plan, system tune-up, system test with distribution uniformity, reporting overspray or run-off
that causes overland flow, and preparation of an irrigation schedule.
The landscape installation report shall include the following statement: "The landscape and
irrigation system have been installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan and
complies with the criteria of the ordinance and the permit."
15. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE
Per the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15), a maintenance schedule shall be established
and submitted to the Director of Community Development or his/her designee, either with the
landscape application package, with the landscape installation report, or any time before the
landscape installation report is submitted.
a) Schedules should take into account water requirements for the plant establishment period and
water requirements for established landscapes.
b) Maintenance shall include, but not be limited to the following: routine inspection; pressure
testing, adjustment and repair of the irrigation system; aerating and de-thatching turf areas;
replenishing mulch; fertilizing; pruning; replanting of failed plants; weeding; pest control;
and removing obstructions to emission devices.
c) Failed plants shall be replaced with the same or functionally equivalent plants that may be
size-adjusted as appropriate for the stage of growth of the overall installation. Failing plants
shall either be replaced or be revived through appropriate adjustments in water, nutrients,
pest control or other factors as recommended by a landscaping professional.
16. NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES
The project and subsequent operations shall comply with the City's Community Noise Control
Ordinance (Chapter 10.48 of the CMC). In addition, the following mitigation measures shall be
taken in order to reduce noise event impacts to nearby receptor areas:
a) Delivery trucks shall be turned off while unloading products at the loading dock.
b) Construction equipment shall be have quiet design features, be well-maintained, and have a
high quality muffler system.
c) Temporary plywood enclosures shall be erected around stationary equipment that produces
excessive noise at nearby receptors.
d) Unnecessary idling of machines when not in use shall be prohibited.
e) Good maintenance and lubrication procedures shall be used to reduce operating noise.
17. PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING
Prior to commencement of construction activities, the applicant shall arrange for a pre-
construction meeting with the pertinent departments (Building, Planning, and Public Works) to
review an applicant-prepared construction management plan including, but not limited to, plan
for compliance with conditions of approval, staging of construction equipment, tree protection,
public access, and noise and dust control.
18. CONSTRUCTION HOURS
Construction activities shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and Saturday
and Sunday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Construction activities are not allowed on holidays. The developer
shall be responsible for educating all contractors and subcontractors of said construction
restrictions. Rules and regulation pertaining to all construction activities and limitations
72
Resolution No. ASA-2011-04 May 24, 2011
Page-5-
identified in this permit, along with the name and telephone number of a developer appointed
disturbance coordinator, shall be posted in a prominent location at the entrance to the job site.
19. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS
All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible
subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials were recycled
prior to issuance of final demolition permits.
20. DUST CONTROL
The following construction practices shall be implemented during all phases of construction for
the proposed project to prevent visible dust emissions from leaving the site:
a) Water all active construction areas at least twice daily and more often during windy periods
to prevent visible dust from leaving the site; active areas adjacent to windy periods; active
areas adjacent to existing land uses shall be kept damp at all times, or shall be treated with
non-toxic stabilizers or dust palliatives.
b) Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain
at least 2 feet of freeboard;
c) Pave, apply water at least three times daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all
unpaved access roads, parlcing areas and staging areas at construction sites.
d) Sweep streets daily, or more often if necessary (preferably with water sweepers) if visible soil
material is carried onto adjacent public streets.
e) The applicant shall incorporate the City's construction best management practices into the
building permit plan set.
21. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS/TREATMENTS
Final building exterior treatment plan (including but not limited to details on exterior color,
material, architectural treatments and/or embellishments) shall be reviewed and approved by the
Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The final building
exterior plan shall closely resemble the details shown on the original approved plans. Any
exterior changes determined to be substantial by the Director of Community Development shall
require a modification approval with neighborhood input.
22. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS
The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to
the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any
submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department.
23. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of
such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby
further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If
you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of
Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
73
Resolution No. ASA-2011-04 May 24, 2011
Page-6-
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1. STREET WIDENING
Public street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and
specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
2. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades
and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
3. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION
Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures
shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining
properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the
site is located.
4. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08
of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please
contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate.
5. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Hydrology and pre- and post-
development hydraulic calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water
control measures are to be constructed or renovated. The storm drain system may include, but is
not limited to, subsurface storage of peak stormwater flows (as needed), bioretention basins,
vegetated swales, and hydrodynamic separators to reduce the amount of runoff from the site and
improve water quality. The storm drain system shall be designed to detain water on-site (e.g., via
buried pipes, retention systems or other approved systems and improvements) as necessary to
avoid an increase of one percent flood water surface elevation of the culvert to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer.
6. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No.
331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate
with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall
submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to
prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
7. BICYCLE PARKING
The developer shall provide bicycle parking consistent with the City's requirements to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
8. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino
providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm
drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be
executed prior to issuance of construction permits
74
Resolution No. ASA-2011-04 May 24, 2011
Page - 7 -
Fees:
a. Checking & Inspection Fees: $ Per current fee schedule ($2,468.00 or 5%)
b. Grading Permit: $ Per current fee schedule ($2,217.00 or 5%)
c. Development Maintenance Deposit: $ 1,000.00
d. Storm Drainage Fee: $ TBD
e. Power Cost: **
f. Map Checking Fees: $ Per current fee schedule ($7,817.00)
g. Park Fees: $ Per current fee schedule (N/A)
h. Street Tree By Developer
** Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC
Bonds:
Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements
Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement
On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
-The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the
City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of
a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees
changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule.
9. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be
screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not
visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building
setback area.
10. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control
Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and
street improvement plans.
11. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT
When and where it is required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the
developer must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the SWRCB, which encompasses preparation
of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management
Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance.
12. C.3 REQUIREMENTS
C.3 regulated improvements are required for all projects creating and/or replacing 10,000 S.F. or
more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site). The developer shall reserve
a minimum of 4% of developable surface area for the placement of low impact development
measures, for storm water treatment, on the tentative map, unless an alternative storm water
treatment plan, that satisfies C.3 requirements, is approved by the City Engineer.
The developer must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm
water treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), which must be designed per approved
numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement
75
Resolution No. ASA-2011-04 May 24, 2011
Page-8-
Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of
ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMPs are each required.
All storm water management plans are required to obtain certification from a City approved third
party reviewer.
13. EROSION CONTROL PLAN
The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer.
This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion
control notes shall be stated on the plans.
14. WORK SCHEDULE
Every 6 months, the developer shall submit a work schedule to the City to show the timetable for
all grading/erosion control work in conjunction with this project.
15. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The developer shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Agreement with the City prior to
final occupancy. The Agreement shall include the operation and maintenance for non-standard
appurtenances in the public road right-of-way that may include, but is not limited to, sidewalk,
pavers, and street lights.
16. BUS STOP LOCATION
The developer shall improve bus stops along the Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer; this may include consistent shelters for the bus stops, but will
not include duck outs or relocation of the bus stops.
17. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved
by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as
well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be
reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for all signage and striping
work throughout the City.
18. TRAFFIC SIGNS
Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City.
19. TRASH ENCLOSURES
The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs
Manager. Clearance by the Public Works Department is needed prior to obtaining a building
permit.
20. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS
The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to
refuse truck access for the proposed development.
21. STREET TREES
Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125.
76
Resolution No. ASA-2011-04 May 24, 2011
Page-9-
22. FIRE PROTECTION
Fire sprinlclers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City.
23. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Santa Clara County Fire
Department prior to issuance of building permits.
24. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as
needed.
25. SANTA CLARA WATER DISTRICT CLEARANCE
Provide Santa Clara water district approval before issuance of a building permit. The developer
shall pay for and obtain Water District permit for activities or modifications within the District
easement or fee right of way or affecting District facilities.
26. CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY CLEARANCE
Provide California Water Service Company approval before issuance of a building permit
approval.
27. SANITARY DISTRICT
A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Cupertino Sanitary District prior to
issuance of building permits.
28. UTILIT'Y EASEMENTS
Clearance approvals from the agencies with easements on the property (including PG&E, PacBell,
and California Water Company, and/or equivalent agencies) will be required prior to issuance of
building permits.
29. EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION FUND
The Developer is required to pay $5,000.00 to fund one Emergency Vehicle Preemption device for
a traffic signal at one of the adjacent intersections.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of Mav, 2011, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission
of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chairperson
Director of Community Development Cupertino Planning Commission
G: � Planning � PDREPORT � RES � 2011 �ASA-2011-04 res.doc
77
Attach ment 2
Bay Club C�pertint�
Focused Transportation Impact Analysis
Final Report
�repared for: ' Prepared by: �� ri R' i'E E R� '
160 West Santa Clara Street '
Suite 675
San Jose, CA 95113
May 2011
78
re re for:
r r y:
�
79
I............................................................................................................................................ i
Aeak our Trip stimates .............................................................................................................................. i
IntersectionOperations ........................................................................................................................................ i
Site Access, On-Site Circulation, and Parking .....................................................................................................ii
1. INTFttJC}UCTItJN ................................................................................................................................................. 'I
Study Intersections and Analysis Scenarios ....................................................................................................... 1
AnalysisMethods .................................................................................................................................................4
eportOrganization ............................................................................................................................................ 5
. I I I I ....................................................................................................................................
oadwayetwork ................................................................................................................................................6
xisting edestrian and icycle Facilities ........................................................................................................... 6
ExistingTransit Service ....................................................................................................................................... 7
Existing Intersection Volumes, Lane Configurations, and Operations .............................................................. 10
3. PRC?JECT CC?NDITION� ..................................................................................................................................13
�roject 1"raffic stimates .................................................................................................................................... 13
Project Intersection �evels of Service ............................................................................................................... � 7
Intersection Impact Criteria ................................................................................................................................ �7
IntersectionImpacts .......................................................................................................................................... � 7
4. SITE ACCESS, tJN-SBTE �IRGU�ATIt�IV, AN�P PARKING .............................................................................18
Vehicular Site Access and Qn-Site Circulation ................................................................................................. � 8
PedestrianAccess ............................................................................................................................................. 18
BicycleAccess ................................................................................................................................................... 19
TransitAccess ................................................................................................................................................... 19
arking............................................................................................................................................................... 19
. I I I ...........................................................................................................................
Cuulative Traffic sti ates .............................................................................................................................20
Cumulative Ro�dway Improvements .................................................................................................................20
Cumulative Intersection Levels of Service ........................................................................................................ 20
6. Ct�IVGULSItJNS .....o......o......o..........o......o......o...o......o......o......o......o..........o......o......o......o..........o......o......o......o... 23
I
Appendix A: Intersection Turning ovement Counts
Appendix : Level of Service Calculations
Appendix C: Approved and ending evelop ents
80
LI I
Figure � Project Location and Study Area ...............................................................................................2
Figure Site Plan ....................................................................................................................................3
Figure 3 xisting Pedestrian and icycle Facilities ................................................................................. 8
Figure 4 Existing Transit Facilities ........................................................................................................... 9
Figure 5 Existing Intersection Alitl Peak Hour Volumes, Lane Configurations, and TrafFic Control
evices....................................................................................................................................11
Figure 6 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment ................................................................................ � 5
Figure 7 Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Volumes, �ane Configurations, and Traffic Control
evices....................................................................................................................................16
Figure 8 Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project AM Peak Hour Volumes, Lane Configurations, and
TrafficGontrol evices ............................................................................................................ 22
81
B
Table �-� A eak- our Intersection Level of Service �ummary ............................................................. ii
Table � Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions ..................................................................4
Table 2 Existing Transit Service ........................................................................................................... � 0
Table 3 Existing AM Peak Hour Intersectian Levels of Service ...........................................................12
Table 4 Trip Generation Estimates .......................................................................................................14
Table 5 Project AM Peak-Hour Intersection Levels of Service ............................................................ � 7
Table 7 Cumulative AM Peak Hour Intersection �evels of Service ......................................................2�
82
'
This report presents the results of the focused transport�tion impact analysis (TIA) for the proposed ay
Club Cupertino project. The 66,200-square foot fitness club will be located within a portion of the existing
Sears store at Vallco Shopping all in Cupertino, California. The site is located on the north side of
�tevens Creek oulevard between olfe oad and erimeter oad.
The Sears store (and the shopping mall in general) generates very little tra ic during the morning
commute period; the fitness club is expected to generate a moderate amount of traffic during this time
period. oth uses generate similar amounts of traffic during the evening commute period. Therefore, the
effect af the fitness club's �dded A peak hour traffic on the surrounding roadway system was evaluated.
The fitness club will gener�te fewer than 100 new pe�k hour trips eaning neither a full City of Cupertino
nor a congestion m�nage ent progra {C P) TIA per Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority {VTA)
guidelines is required. Therefore, this TIA focuses on the operations of intersections in close proximity to
the site and addresses site access for all modes and parking. The consolidation of tvvo of the existing
driveways on Stevens Creek oulevard is �Iso �ddressed.
I I
The a ount of traffic added to the surrounding roadways by ay Club was developed using rates and
equations published in Trip Generation, 8 Edition {Institute of Transportation ngineers, 2008). ay Club
will add approxi ately 77 A peak hour trips to the surrounding roadways. It will generate fewer daily
trips and fewer peak hour trips than the portion of the �ears store it will replace.
I I I
Operations of three intersections in the immediate vicinity of the site were evaluated to determine whether
they could accommodate the traffic added by ay Club. The operations were evaluated during the
weekday morning {A } peak hourforthe following scenarios:
c ri 1: Existing Conditions – xisting volu es obtained fro counts.
Scenario 2: Existing Plus Project Conditions – Existing volumes plus traffic generated by the
fitness club.
c ri . Cumulative Conditions – xisting volumes plus traffic generated by approved and
pending development projects.
c ri . Cumulative Plus Project Conditions – Tra ic volumes for Scenario 3 plus tra ic
generated by the fitness club.
The results �re summarized ir� Table S-1. All of the intersections will rnaintain �cceptable, LOS or
better, oper�tions with the addition of ay Club tr�ffic.
—
T L -1
AM PEAK-HOUR INTER�ECTICDN LEdtEL C}F SERVICE SUMMARY
xisti C mulative
Intersection Existing plus Prc�ject Cumulative plus Project
1. �tevens Creek Boulevard 1 Perimeter Raad A A A A
2. Stevens Creek Boulevard t Wolfe Road-Miller �+ p+ p p
Avenue
3. Wolfe Road t Vallco Parkway B B- C C
Notes:
Besed an Ievel af service methad far signalized intersectians using methad described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual,
with adjusted saturetian filaw rates ta refilect Santa Clere Caunty Canditians. LOS calculetians canducted using the TRAFFIX
8.0 Ievel of service analysis software package.
�OS = Level of service
Saurce: Fehr & Peers, May 2011.
�9TE AGCESS, ON-SITE CIRCU�ATI{�N, AND PARKING
Vehicular access to the site is provided via two right-turn in and out only driveways on Wolfe Road, two
right-turn in and out only driveways on Stevens Creek oulevard, one full access driveway on erirneter
oad, and one full-access driveway on Vallco arkway. Vehicles have numerous ways to get into and out
of the site such that no one driveway will be overloaded.
A study was conducted to evaluate consolid�ting the two closely-spaced drivew�ys on Stevens Creek
oulevard. Closely-sp�ced driveways create added conflict points between vehicles, between vehicles
and pedestrians, and betvveen vehicles and bicyclists. The results show that one driveway can
accommodate the traffic volumes with ay Club and maintain good {LOS } operations. Since one
driveway can aecom odate the traffic volu es and has fewer conflict points, it is recom ended that the
driveways be consolidated. Further, the driveway that is aligned with the north-south circulation aisle
adjacent to the western edge of the building would be the best location for the consolidated driveway.
Stevens Creek oulevard and olfe oad have sidewalks on both sides and bike lanes. Therefore the
site has good pedestrian and bicycle access. Transit access is provided by Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority bus routes that operate on Stevens Creek oulevard and olfe oad.
The number of parking spaces at Vallco Shopping all was developed to accommodate all allowable
uses including stores, restaurants, movie theaters, and fitness clubs. Currently there are ample available
spaces near the site and ay Club will provide approxi ately 80 additional parking spaces. Therefore the
parking supply is sufficient to acco odate ay Club Cupertino. Class I and Class II bike parking
facilities should be provided on-site per unicipal Code Chapter 19.100.
—
�� ' '
This report presents the results of a focused transportation impact analysis {TIA} for the proposed ay
Club project in Cupertino, California. The proposed project is a 66,200-square foot fitness club to be
located in a portion of the existing Sears store at Vallco Shopping all. The site is located on the north
side of Stevens Greek oulevard between olfe oad and erimeter oad. Consolidating two of the
existing driveways on Stevens Creek oulevard is also being considered. The site location is illustrated
on the map on Figure 1. The proposed site plan is presented on Figure 2.
Typically, a TIA would not be conducted for a project occupying space with a compatible use (per the
site's zaning). In this case the Sears store {and the shopping all in general) generates very little trafFic
during the orning co ute period, and the fitness club is expected to generate a moderate a ount of
traffic during this ti e period. oth uses generate si ilar a ounts af trafFic during the evening co rnute
period. Therefore, the effect of the fitness club's added A peak hour trafFic on the surrounding roadway
system was evaluated in this analysis.
The fitness club will gener�te fewer than 100 new pe�k hour trips eaning neither a full City of Cupertino
nor a congestion manage ent program {C P) TI�, per Santa Cl�ra Valley Transportation �,uthority
guidelines is required. Therefore, this TIA focuses on the operations of intersections in close proximity to
the site and addresses site access for all modes and parking.
I I I I
The following intersections {shown on Figure 1} were evaluated:
1. Stevens Creek oulevard and erimeter oad
2. Stevens Creek oulevard and olfe oad/ iller Avenue
3. olfe oad and Vallco arkway
The operations of these intersections were evalu�ted during the weekday morning (A } peak hour for the
following scen�rios:
c ri �: Existing Conditions – xisting volumes obtained from counts.
c ri . Existing Plus Project Conditions – xisting volumes plus traffic generated by the
fitness cl�ab.
c ri . Cumulative Conditions – xisting volu es plus traffic generated by approved and
pending develop ent projects.
c ri . Cumulative Plus Project Conditions – Tra ic volumes for Scenario 3 plus tra ic
generated by the fitness club.
—
,...
':., �_':;,. P'.r�une�� e aue ..., _
_
, ,
' �:::;
. �
>:
4 i
� :
� ::
.::..... �.. '� +'� :t
.. � .. .... .�.; a:.. ., C :
; �
,
�
.. a .::�,...
'� 3 ;,
� :;u,
� 3;,
;.;' 0 3 °'°; ;
� ' � :
�3
�; \
Vallco Pkwy
�; ,, ,
v : , ......... ,.:..: ..
�::
n! i
SITE 3i• ,. _'
a� :
>:;
¢::
V" �
L�! :,,
Stevens Creek�Blvd
a� :i:
>;:..
¢::.;
�u ;
� .;,;
Legend
Feet
Study Intersections � o zso soo �so �,000
Bay Club Cupertino
F E H R� P E E R S Project Location and Study Area
May 2011 Figure 1
SJ11-1251
86
i
i �� m � �
i o � o
i
� � � � �
i i e �
--. __. - � � � � oo e
i � � � -
i
_ �
i
� �'
�� � � � � � �; o o � �
�� ��� ����
� �
�
� �
I I � � �
� I � � � �
� 4
� � � a �
� m �
° ° �
� o� �
o �
�
° �
� �
�
�
�
� �
� a
�
� \ o
� �
�
�
�
�
�
� o
� = Potential Stevens Creek Boulevard
Driveway
Closure
Bay Club Cupertino
FEHR � PEERS Site Plan
May2011 Figure 2
SJ11-1251
87
I
The operations of roadway facilities are described with the term level of service. Level of Service (LOS} is
a qualitative description of traffic flow based on such factors as speed, tr�vel time, delay, and freedom to
maneuver. Six levels are defined from LC}S A, representing congestion-free conditions, to LOS F, when
volumes exceed c�pacity and stop-and-go conditions occur. LOS represents "at-capacity" operations.
The level of service calculation ethod for signalized intersections approved by the City of Cupertino and
the VTA bases intersection operations on average control vehicular delay calculated as described in
Chapter 16 of the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect
conditions in Santa Clara County. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up ti e,
stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The average control delay for signalized intersections was
calculated using T AFFIX 8.0 analysis software and was correlated to a L�S designation as shown in
Table 1.
L 1
I LIZ 1 T CTI L V L F VIC 1 ITI
L�vel of Average Gontrol Delay
ervic� escri tion er Ve icle ( eco ds}
A Operatians with very law delay accurring with favorable pragression <_ 10.0
andlor short cycle lengths.
B+ 10.1 to 12.0
g Operations with low delay occurring with good progression andlor 12.1 to 18.0
short cycle lengths.
B- 18.1 ta 20.0
C+ 20.1 ta 23.0
� Operatians with average delays resulting from fair pragression andlor �3 to 32.0
longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear.
C- 32.1 to 35.0
�+ Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable 35.1 to 39.0
D pragression, lang cycle lengths, and high VIC ratios. Many vehicles 39.1 ta 51.0
p_ stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. 51.1 ta 55.0
�+ Operatians with high delay values indicating poar pragressian, long 55.1 ta 60.0
E cycle lengths, and high V!C ratios. Individual cycle failures are 60.1 to 75.0
�_ frequent occurrences. 75.1 ta 80.0
F Operatians with delays unacceptable ta most drivers accurring due ta > 80.0
over-saturation, poor progression, or very lor�g cycle lengths.
Source: Traffic Level of Service Analysis Guidelines, VTA Congestion Management Program, June 2003; Highway Capacity
Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000.
The City of Cupertino level of service standard {i.e., minimum acceptable operations} for all of the study
intersections is LOS .
—
I I
The rem�inder of this repor� is divided into five ch�pters. The existing tr�nsportation system in the study
area and the current oper�tions of the key intersections are described in Chapter 2. Chapter 3 describes
the method used to estimate the amount of traffic �dded by ay Club and its effect on the operations of
the study intersections. Site access (including the potential consolidation of the two drivew�ys), on-site
circulation, and parking are discussed in Chapter 4. edestrian, bicycle and transit access are also
discussed. Cu ulative traffic projections and intersection operations both with and without ay Club are
discussed in Chapter 5. Conclusions are presented in Chapter 6.
—
� ' ' ' '
This chapter describes the existing conditions of the roadway facilities, pedestrian and bicycle facilities,
transit service, plus existing intersection traffic volumes, lane configurations, and operations.
The project site location and the surrounding ro�dway network are presented on Figure 1. Interstate 280,
Stevens Creek oulevard, and olfe oad provide regional access while Vallco arkway and eri eter
oad provide local access to the site.
1-280 is a north-south, six-lane freeway with an additional {one} lane in each direction designated as a
high occupancy vehicle ( OV} lane. OV lanes, also known as carpool lanes, are restricted for use by
vehicles occupied by two or more persons or motorcycles, as well as select alternative fuel vehicles,
between 5:00 am and 9:00 am and between 3:00 pm and 7:00 pm. The freeway e�ctends from San
Francisco in the north to San Jose in the south. In the vicinity of the site, I-280 runs in a northwest to
southeast direction and is located north of the site.
Stevens Creek Boulevard is a six-lane, east-west divided arterial forming the southern bound�ry of the
project site. It e�ends fro the western boundary of the City of Cupertino into the City of �an Jose and
the City of Santa Clara to the east. Stevens Creek oulevard is pri arily fronted by co ercial land
uses, including retail, restaurant, and office uses in the vicinity of the site.
Wolfe Road is a four-to-six-lane, north-south arterial located on the east side of the project site. It e�ends
between the City of Sunnyvale in the north and the City of Saratoga in the south. �outh of Stevens Creek
oulevard, olfe oad is designated iller Avenue.
Vallco Parkway is a six-lane, local roadway that connects olfe oad to Tantau Avenue to the north and
east of the project site.
Perimeter Road is a two-lane roadway connecting Stevens Creek oulevard, olfe oad, �nd Vallco
arkw�y. �erimeter o�d runs beneath olfe oad and access between the two ro�dways is provided
by right-in / right-out intersections on both the northbound and southbound sides of olfe oad.
I I I I I I I
Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian facilities include sidewalks and pedestrian signals at signalized intersections, as well as multi-
use trails and pedestrian rights-of-way. Sidewalks are provided on both sides of olfe oad and Stevens
Creek oulevard in the vicinity of the project site. Sidewalks have been constructed along Vallco
Parkway, olfe oad, Stevens Creek oulevard, and the west side of Perimeter oad near the project
site. All of the signalized intersections in the area are equipped with pedestrian signals. Figure 3 shows
the existing pedestrian facilities in the project site's vicinity.
Bicycle Facilities
icycle facilities include bike paths, bike lanes, and bike routes. ike paths {Class � facilities) are
pathways, separate from roadways that are designated for use by bicycles. Q en, these pathways also
allow pedestrian access. ike lanes (Class 2 facilities) are lanes on roadways designated for use by
bicycles with special lane markings, pavement legends, and signage. ike routes {Class 3) are existing
rights-of-way that acco odate bicycles but are not separate fro the existing travel lanes. outes are
typically designated only with signs.
—
ike lanes {Class 2} providing direct access to the project site exist along Stevens Creek oulevard,
olfe oad, and Vallco Parkway. xisting bicycle facilities within the study area are also shown on Figure
3.
I I I I
The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority {VTA} operates bus and light rail transit {L T} service in
�anta Clara County. VTA operates bus service in Cupertino. Figure 4 shows the existing bus stop
locations and bus routes near the project site. outes that operate adjacent to the site are described
below and su arized in Table 2.
Route 23 is � loe�l b�as route that provides serviee between ast San Jose and the e Anza College via
Stevens Creek oulevard near the site. The hours of operation are from 5:20 am to 1:00 am with 12- to
30- minute headways on weekdays. On weekends, this route operates on 15- to 30-minute headvtrays
between 6:15 am and 1:00 arn.
Route 26 is � local bus route that provides service between ast San Jose and the Sunnyv�le Lockheed
artin L T Station. eekday hours of operation are from 5:20 am to 11:50 pm with 30-minute headways.
eekend operations are provided on 30- to 60- minute headways between 6:30 am and 10:50 pm. This
route operates on olfe oad east of the site.
Route 81 is a local bus route between San Jose State lJniversity and Vallco Shopping all. The hours of
operation are 6:25 a to 8:50 p on weekdays with 30- to 60- inute he�dways. This route operates on
60- inute headw�ys between 9:30 a and 4:50 pm an Saturdays and Sundays fro Santa Clara Transit
Center to Vallco Shopping all. oute 81 operates on olfe oad near the project site.
Route 101 is an express bus route between the Park-n- ide lot at Camden Avenue / State oute 85 and
�alo Alto. This route operates northbound once at 6:50 am and southbound at 5:15 pm near the project
site. This route does not operate on weekends. oute 10� operates on olfe oad and I-280 near the
project site.
Route 182 is an express bus route between the I at �iley Avenue and alo Alto. This route operates
twice in the southbound direction between 7:25 am to 7:55 �m and twice in the northbound direction
between 5:35 pm to 6:15 pm. This route does not oper�te on weekends. oute 182 operates on Vallco
arkway and I-2�0 near the project site.
—
�
' `... �
���
_:: ;;
=� �;_:..
; , � Pruneri • ge Aue
� \
� �
>
; ..
¢
;. �
,: ,.
�
, �
;:,: c
�
� . �
11 ����
II. :II II. :II .
;;���
�
�
�
0
� ;
�;
� _= Vallco Pkw,y \
°' ������� °, t . ���<���. � :-
�;: _
n! i
SITE
II���
p� : _
>:;
¢::
V" �
t LJi :
= = StevensCreek�Blvd
II���II II���II II��� ���°� ,��r��
>
a
v
�
Legend
��� Traffic Signal
= Crosswalk
° Class II Bike Lane
Class III Bike Route �
Existing Sidewalk Feet
N o zso soo �so �,000
Bay Club Cupertino
FEHR � PEERS i tin Pe e t ian an i le a ilitie
May 2011 Figure
SJ11-1251
92
::; �
: 3 81
'81 ..
�
�103 � 26 ,
81
\'= s .. Pr,une1i.�l,� e Ave
182�
i 101
�:::;
. �
>
€ :.
4
3 ..: ...... . .... ... �., �
,: :,. :: ..:......::._ _:: r�
C
..x �
�
103� :_::.
� a:.:.
81
�;:� :.
-�
'' a : € ; x:.. ;;:.::.
� :.
; s;
� ,
�'_
�_�
Vallca Pkw,y
v ; x..x:. x..x..x.. _ ;
�:i
n! i
101 x 182.:.
SITE °' ,
¢
V -� ;
li+
�z3� StevensCreekBlvd #
_ 81 23 Z3
n� ;.,,:
� ;
�c .,3,:
n� .3,,===
�
26,
Le�end
Study Intersections
XX;:: Express Bus Route
�'XX� Local Bus Route
Feet
� Bus 5tops � o zso soo �so �,000
Bay Club Cupertino
� E S Existing Transit Facilities
May 2011 Figure 4
SJ11-1251
93
T L z
x' ' N�'T v'c
co ut�
oute ro To ee day peratin Mours ea way
2 � Alum Rock Transit p� Anza College 5:20 AN1 — 1:00 AI� 12 min.
Center
26 Eastridge Transit Center �unnyvalel�ackheed � AM — 11:50 PM 30 min.
Nlartin Transit Center
$1 San Jose State Vallco Sho in Mall 6:25 AN1 — 8:50 PN1 30 min.
University pp �
101 Camden & Hwy 85 Palo Alta 6:50 AIV115:15 PM 1 Trip �ach
C�irection C�aily
182 IBMlBailey Avenue Palo Alto 7:25 — 7:55 AN115:35 — 6:15 PM � Trips Each
Direction Daily
Source: VTA, January 2011.
' ' ' ' , ' ' , '
The City of Cupertino provided a eount for the ir�terseetion of Stevens Creek oulevard and olfe oad.
ew trafFie eounts were condueted �t the other two study interseetions in April 2011. The turnir�g
rnovemer�t eount d�ta are ineluded in Appendix A. Figure 5 presents the existing A peak-hour turnir�g
rnovemer�t volu es, lane configur�tions, �nd traffic control devices at the study intersections.
This information was used to calculate the existing levels of service for the key intersections. The results
are presented in Table 3. The corresponding calculation sheets are contained in Appendix . The City of
Cupertino defines acceptable peak-hour intersection operations as LOS or better. The results of the
LQS c�lculations indicate that all study intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service.
—
� �
� �
� o
14 , �, � � ' 125 � � 65
`� ° `� � � 1383 :t c ° � ', 927 `� `'r- °' 2
�
� 52 � 69 16
� '
d
� Stevens Creek Blvd � Stevens Creek Blvd � Vallco Parkway
Driveway
� �
7 453 ', d � ' 0'_
880 —kr � o cv N 516 � �,.. � ° o o cv � �� '��. cU ~ � o
10 � 'S , 85 � cv o7 .- 1 � `—�' ;� �-
�' 'S
C�'
; ........ .::.�.. .......�: ........�: ........,, �i ',,,,.
�
� .:;
' Q � ;:, , .i; ::.
" i
.. ......., . ' a— :; ;. .. .. .
�i .: ;\
� : \
� _= Vallco Pkw,y
:
�;
a:
,
v'!
�-!
a� ;
;
SITE 3', 38;
a� :
>:;
¢;,.
l'1, :',,
� ;,,
; u- Ste.v.ensGreek�Blv.d '
n� ,::
� ,:,,:
¢::;i
n� ;:;
�;;;:
Legend
Study Intersections
AM Peak-Hour Volume Feet
� and Lane Configuration o zso soo �so �,000
Existing Intersection AM Peak Hour Volumes,
� E S Lane Configurations, and Traffic Control Devices
May 2011 Figure 5
SJ11-1251
95
1 w',,
1 E y, * , ,:i . ! ',, * .� ',,.
- .::. ' ! ..,,, ',,. ! � � _ ',, ! ,,.� i �',, f � �, ,,, ',,. � �,; . ',,.
,' - - ', .: � .�. ... E � �, .: ,.� � � ,,,, � � ,,,, i W �:,,, ',, � '� �' ' ',, � ',. , ,', ■ ,' ,,,, t. ,.
� � , ���. .i . �..... � ��4 �' l4.:,! �,.
i
... + :.. . . .. . ,' , � �' ' , � ',. , �, . ..
�' i � i . :� �.: . 4 � ... . �.. � ,,,, � � ',,. ',,���',,.
� ,; ..- ....
.. � _ ._. 4 ... ! �i, .�.� � �! ., � � l . � - . .. . . _ - ....-. .- ��i
� . . I . . . ! .� i � � � ,,, � ' , �, :� � �.',. � � ,, �. � ! , �. .
4 �., - � ... � t � � ,, - . . : ,. ' . .�. ,. .� �.
*, �
� - ' � i
' • • • �
' • •• ' � * • � � � � • � ' • * '* ■ � ' •, � � •• t �
• * • ' #' •!' ■ � •' • •,' • • '*,
• • '* ■ ■ �' •� • �!
,,;�� i � ■ , • ■ ',, / •,, • / ',, i � / ��. /,,,..
. ., , � � ■ • '' ■ �" � •...: � � � .:� ' ,� � � � .�. • � �- ' • ,,,. '
. r ■ . � ■ • ■� � i • ■ ■ r � .
� �t • _ _ �• _ • � _ _ • � 4 � � .�
• • • � 3� -r � �
� � � _ _ � _ . . �
�
� ' '
roject Conditions are defined as existing traffic volumes plus traffic gener�ted by the proposed ay
Club. The method used to estimate the amount of traffic generated by the project �nd its distribution to
the surrounding roadway system is described first. Then intersection operations with the added traffic are
evaluated. Intersection operations under xisting and roject Conditions are compared to determine the
effects of the project on study intersection operations.
Other circulation issues, such as non-automobile travel modes, site access from local roadways, on-site
circulation, and parking are discussed in Chapter 4.
I I
The amount of traffic added to the roadway system by the proposed project is estimated using a three-
step process: (1) trip generation, (2} trip distribution, and (3} trip assignment. The first step estimates the
amount of tra ic added to the roadway network. The second step estimates the directions of travel to and
from the project site. The trips are assigned to specific street segments and intersection turning
movements in the third step. 1"he results of the process for the proposed ay Club are described in the
following sections.
Trip Generation
stimates of the amount of tra ic added to the surrounding roadways by ay Glub take into consideration
the a ount of trafFic generated by ay Club inus the a ount of trafFic generated by the portion of the
�ears store that it will replace. The trip esti ates for ay Club were developed using rates published in
Trip Generation, 8 Edition {Institute of Transportation ngineers, 2008} for ealthlFitness Club {Land
lJse code 492}. Trip rates for the portion of the Sears that will be replaced were developed by applying
IT equations for Shopping Center {Land Use code 820} to the entire size of the Sears store to take into
consideration the econo ies of scale associated with larger retail establish ents. So e of the traffic
going to and from the Sears store and ay Club co prises vehicles that are already on the roadway
system, such as people who stop to shop or workout on their way home fro work. These trips are called
passby trips and they are accounted for in the esti ates. The results are presented in Table 4.
ay Club is projected to generate 1,850 weekday daily trips, 77 A peak hour trips (34 in and 43 out) and
186 peak hour trips {109 in and 77 out). The Sears store is not open during the A peak hour.
stimates of the amount of tra ic generated by the portion to be replaced are 2,420 daily trips and 226
P peak hour trips (106 in and 120 out}. ay Club will add approximately 77 A peak hour trips to the
surrounding roadways. It will generate fewer daily trips and fewer peak hour trips than the Sears
store.
—
T L
TRIP GENERATIC}N ESTIMATES
iZe eek ay eak o r Trips eak o r Tri �
Use {ks �te Tri s ate 1 ut Tatal ate In ut Total
ayClub 66.2 32.93 2,1$0 1.38 41 50 91 3.53 133 100 233
Pass-by Reduction 15°l0 {330} 15°l0 {7) {7} {14} 20°l0 {24) {23} {47}
Subtota 1,850 34 43 77 109 77 186
Sears 66.2 48.77 3,230 0.00 0 0 0 4.54 144 157 301
Pass-by Reduction 25°l0 (810} 0 0 0 25°l0 (3$) {37} {75}
Subtota 2,420 0 0 0 106 120 226
et d e Trips (57 } 3 3 77 3 { 2} {39}
Source: Fehr & Peers, April 2011.
Trip Distribution
The directions of approach and departure for proposed project vehicle trips were estimated using the
relative locations of complementary land uses and existing travel patterns in the area. The major
directions of approach and departure and the trip percentage distribution for each are illustrated on Figure
6.
Trip Assignment
The trips generated by the project were assigned to the roadway system based on the directions of
approach and departure. The project trip assignment is also shown on Figure 6. Figure 7 shows the A
peak-hour trafFic volumes at the st�ady intersections under xisting plus roject Conditions.
—
ro e t rip i n ent
�' �
�; Q
�, ' � � o ,�
� �,
Q
.�
Ste en Cree BI ' Ste en Cree BI all o ar ay ;,
ri e ay '
—� Z —� ' °' I 15 � ' o �
a, 5 �' ' � �
ro � � �
�; , ', � o
ro e t rip i tribution
. , _;
�::
��
� ::;
_' � :_ ; ;_� :. :'
�:;
� .:_ \
�;, \
� _= Vallco Pkw,y
:
�;
a:
,
v'!
�-!
a� ;
;
SITE 3', 38;
a� :
>:;
¢;,.
l'1, :',,
� ;,,
; u- Ste.v.ensGreek�Blv.d '
n� ,::
� ,:,,:
¢::;i
n� ;:;
�;;;:
Legend
Study Intersections
AM Peak-Hour
Traflic Volume
�—P ProjedTrip
��� Distribution � Feet
N o zso soo �so �,000
FEHR � PEERS r ectTri istri ti n an ssign ent
May 2011 Figure
SJ11-1251
99
� �
� �
�'
14 , � � � 125 , � 65
� ° cv � �� ''rt' 1390 v c�' cv (U �. •4— 937 `� r °' "�— 2
� "_
� 52 ��O 69 16
� '
�;
� Stevens Creek Blvd � Stevens Creek Blvd � Vallco Parkway
Driveway
�
14 455 � 16 p
880 —1► ];. o cv 521 —M►� �, � c�-i cn 0—► �� r- �n co
10 —i► tB r cv 86 �,. � o° N 1 � � � o
> '�
C�'
; ........ .::.�.. .......�: ........�: ........,, �i ',,,,.
�
� .:;
' Q � ;:, , .i; ::.
" i
.. ......., . ' a— :; ;. .. .. .
�i .: ;\
� : \
� _= Vallco Pkw,y
:
�;
a:
,
v'!
�-!
a� ;
;
SITE 3', 38;
a� :
>:;
¢;,.
l'1, :',,
� ;,,
; u- Ste.v.ensGreek�Blv.d '
n� ,::
� ,:,,:
¢::;i
n� ;:;
�;;;:
Legend
Study Intersections
AM Peak-Hour Volume Feet
� and Lane Configuration o zso soo �so �,000
Existing Plus Project AM Peak Hour Volumes,
� E S Lane Configurations, and Traffic Control Devices
May 2011 Figure 7
SJ11-1251
100
I I 9
Intersection levels of service were calculated with the net added tra ic. The results of the LOS
calculations for both xisting and roject Conditions are presented in T�ble 5. The calculation worksheets
are included in Appendix .
T L 5
PF2C3JECT AM PEAK-HC}UF� INl'ERSECTION LEVELS GF SERVICE
xistin xisti lu� roject
4 i Crit 4 i Crit
Intersection Delay' �OS D@I2�/ LOS VJG� Delay
1. Stevens Creek Boulevard 1 Perimeter 8� A 8.7 A 0.009 0.5
Road
2. �tevens Creek Boulevard /lNalfe Raad- 38.7 D+ 38.9 D+ 0.008 0.4
Nliller Avenue
3. Wolfe Road / Vallca Parkway 17.9 18.0 B- 0.010 0.4
Nates:
1 ole intersection weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections using
method described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect Santa Clara County
Conditions. �OS calculations conducted using the TRAFFIX 8.0 level of service analysis software package.
2 LOS = Level af service
3 Change in the critical volume-to-capacity ratio {V/C) between Existing and Project Conditions.
4 Chenge in critical mavement delay between Existing end Praject Canditians.
Source: Fehr & Peers, May 2011.
' ' ' ' '
The impacts of the project were evaluated by comparing the results of the level of service calculations
under roject Conditions to the results under xisting Conditions.
A significant project impact to a City of Cupertino signalized intersection occurs if the project results in
one of the following:
■ �perations at a signalized intersection deteriorate from LO� or better under xisting
Conditions to L�� or F under Project Conditions; or
■ xacerbation of unacceptable operations {LOS or F) at a signalized intersection by
increasing the average critical delay by four {4} seconds or more and increasing the volu e-
to-capacity {V/C} ratio by 0.01 or more.
I I I
Th� study intersections continue to operate at acceptabl� I�vels of service for Project Conditions. Thus,
th� project i pact to these signalized intersections is consid�red less-than-significant.
—
� ' a ' ' ' a '
This chapter discusses the project's site plan {shown on Figure 2) regarding pedestrian, bicycle, transit
and vehicular access and on-site circulation. l"he potential driveway consolidation and p�rking are also
addressed.
I I -I I I
Vehicular Access
Vehicular �ccess to the site is provided via two right-turn in and out only driveways on olfe o�d, two
right-turn in and out only driveways on �tevens Creek oulevard, one full access driveway on Peri eter
oad, and one full-access drivew�y on Vallco Parkway. The olfe oad �nd Stevens Creek driveways
are shown on Figure 2. The Perimeter oad and Vallco Parkway driveways also serve other uses at the
all and can be seen on aeri�l photographs of the site. Vehicles have nu erous ways to get into and out
of the site and no one driveway will be overloaded.
Driveway Consolidation
A study was conducted to evaluate consolidating the two drivew�ys on �tevens Creek oulevard
because they are closely spaced. Closely-spaced driveways can create added congestion as vehicles
wait for vehicles exiting the adjacent driveway. Plus they introduce added conflict points between
vehicles, between vehicles and pedestrians, and between vehicles and bicyclists.
Counts were conducted during both the morning and evening peak periods to determine the volume of
vehicles using each drivew�y. The results show that one driveway can accommodate the traffic volumes
with ay Club and m�intain good (LOS ) operations.
Sinc� one driv�way can accom odate the projected traffic volu es and has f�wer conflict points, it is
recom ended that the driveways be consolidat�d. Further, the driveway that is aligned with the north-
south circulation aisle adjac�nt to the west�rn �dge of the building would be the best location for the
consolidated driveway.
Vehicular On-Site Circulation
Th� sit� has several on-site circulation aisles that do not have parking spaces on them creating a cl�ar
and direct on-site circulation syst� for vehicles. {See Figure 2.) The site has a two-way east-west
vehicle circulation aisle adjacent to the Sears building along its south�rn edge. This aisle connects the
driv�way on �eri eter oad with one of the driv�ways on olfe oad. Two-way north-south circulation
aisles are located along the eastern and western edges of the building. The western aisle connects the
Vallco arkway driveway �nd one of the driveways on Stevens Creek oulevard. The eastern aisle
makes a 90-degree turn to the north of the building and connects with the other drivew�y on olfe oad.
The circulation aisles intersect on-site at 90-degree angles creating on-site intersections with good
visibility. The western on-site intersection is controlled with stop signs on all approaches.
I
As discussed in the xisting Canditions chapter, sidewalks currently exist along both sides of olfe o�d
�nd Stevens Creek oulevard. A new sidewalk through the ain parking lot will connect the sidewalk on
Stevens Creek oulevard with the building's entry via a painted crosswalk across the vehicle circulation
aisle. It is recommended that traffic calming devices, such as a raised crosswalk, be provided to reduce
vehicle speeds and i prove pedestrian safety. Similarly, a new sidewalk through the parking lot on the
east of the building will connect the sidewalk on olfe aad with the building via a painted crosswalk
—
across the vehicle circulation aisle. Pedestrians will use the sidewalk adjacent to the building to reach the
entrance.
�I�YCLE AC�E�S
Th� site has bicycle access via bike lanes on Stevens Creek oulevard, olfe oad, and Vallco
Parkway. Cyclists will use the internal vehicle circulation aisles to reach the building entrance.
The project should provide Cl�ss I and Cl�ss II bike parking facilities {per unicipal Gode Chapter
19.100} or�-site and in highly visible locations to encourage biking and discour�ge the�t.
I
The closest bus stop to the site is loc�ted on the north side of Stevens Creek oulevard, just west of
olfe o�d. This stop serves oute 23. Stops for oute 26 and 81 are located on olfe oad, �s shown
on Figure 4. The new sidewalk through the front parking lot will connect the oute 23 bus stop to the
building entrance �king it convenient for transit users.
I
The Vallco Shopping all has approximately 1,202,350 sf of cumulative building area and about 4,886
total parking spaces. ased on the original City approval, a parking ratio of 1 space per 248 sf, or 4,849
spaces, were prescribed for the mall. Therefore if all of the parking stalls were considered, the mall
currently has a surplus of 37 parking spaces.
Parking spaces at the mall are shared by all of the all uses. The approved parking ratio was developed
to acco odate all allowable uses including stores, restaurants, movie theaters, and fitness clubs.
The rnall currently has 999,099 sf of occupied space {or an occupancy rate of 83 percent}. Field
observations show that currently there are ample available parking spaces at the mall, including the
parking areas in the immediately vicinity of the ay Club site. Furthermore, ay Club will provide site
improvements that will add approximately �0 parking spaces.
Given that all of the parking spaces are shared among the mall tenants, the existing supply was designed
to accommodate a variety of uses including fitness clubs, there are available spaces near the ay Club
site, and ay Club will add 80 spaces, the parking supply will be su icient to accommodate ay Club
Cupertino project. Class I and Class II bike parking facilities should be provided on-site per unicipal
Code Chapter 19.100.
—
� ' ' '
This chapter discusses the operations of the key intersections under Cumulative and Cumulative plus
roject Conditions. Cumul�tive Conditions include existing traffic volumes plus traffic generated from
development projects that have been approved or are pending. The results are used to provide
information regarding future operations of the study intersections.
I 9 I
Traffic volumes for Cumulative Conditions were estirnated by adding trafFic generated by approved and
pending developments in the study area to the existing intersection A peak-hour volumes. The list of
�pproved and pending projects, presented in Appendix C, was obtained fro City of Cupertino planning
st�fF.
Trip estimates for the approved and pending developments were obtained from transportation impact
analysis (TIA) reports or estimated with IT trip generation rates and standard engineering practice. If a
TIA was not available for a development, the trips associated with it were assigned to the roadway
network based on the relative locations of complementary land uses and existing and estimated future
travel patterns.
Figure 8 shows the A peak-hour trafFic volu es at the study intersections under Cu ulative Conditions.
I I
o future roadway or intersection improvements were identified by City of Cupertino sta ; existing
intersection lane configurations were used forthe Cumulative Conditions analysis.
I I I I
Table 7 presents the intersection LOS calculation results under Cumulative Conditions, with and without
the proposed project. Appendix contains the corresponding calculation sheets. Under Cumulative
Conditions, the study intersections are expected to operate acceptably.
—
T L 7
C9JMULATIVE AM PEAK HOUi� INTERSECTIC}N LEVFLS OF SERdtICE
Cu ul�tive Cu ulative lus Project
:1 i Crit :1 i Grit
Intersection Delay' LOS DeBay' LOS VIG Delay
1. �tevens Creek Boulevard 1 Perimeter $� A 8.8 A 0.008 0.4
Road
2. �tevens Creek Boulevard / Walfe Raad- �� p 40.1 C� 0.007 0.5
Nliller Avenue
3. Wolfe Road t Vallco Parkway 27.2 C 27.3 C 0.010 0.2
Notes:
1 Whale intersectian weighted everege cantral delay expressed in secands per vehicle far signelized intersectians using
method described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, with adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect Santa Clara County
Conditions. �OS calculations conducted using the TRAFFIX 8.0 level of service analysis software package.
2 LOS = Level af service
3 Change in the critical volume-to-capacity ratio {V/C) between Gumulative and Cumulative plus Project Conditions.
4 Change in critical movement delay between Cumulative and Cumulative plus Project Conditions.
Saurce: Fehr & Peers, May2011.
�
Cumulative Conditions
�
� �
� ,,�,_ 18 � � � O � 141 � � � 173
c'�v °�' � 1538 v� c�v � 1054 v m 2
� , 52 � 83 50
� �
� Stevens Creek Blvd � Stevens Creek Blvd � Vallco Parkway
Driveway ,
24 � �I 482 � > ��� I Z$ � O �� I I
1018 —M► � o c� N 628 —Ilr �, Q o� �� 0—M► . L� N r- �
10 � , � 85 � `� °' r 13 � r �
� � '�
�'
Cumulative Plus Project Conditions
�' �
�'- 18 ��� Q 141 ,� ti 173
`N ° c�v � 1545 v� c � 1064 v m m 2
� 52 Q 83 50
� �
� Stevens Creek Blvd � Stevens Creek Blvd � Vallco Parkway
Driveway
31 � �I 484 � > ��� I 43 � � �� I I
1018 —I► � o cv N 633 — p" �,. Q ��� 0—IM•� N o3 �
10 � , � 86 � `� °' r 13 � r �
�, � !�
�'
� .:;�
�
�
' O 3 = a
_'' 's = ' =
, ;
a= 3 ; a� .::.
�;,
rr °3
;
' s ' Vallca,P.kw,y
�° _
w:
,. ...
w;i
�:i
a=
SITE
>3
¢:
�
u; ,
c3
._ .
' StevensCreekBlvd =
a, : ;
> ;::
<L ;ag
Legend � ___
� ;
Study Intersections
AM Peak-Hour Volume Feet
� and Lane Configuration � o zso soo �so �,000
Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project AM Peak-Hour Volumes,
F E H R� P E E R S Lane Configurations, and Traffic Control Devices
May 2011 Figure 8
SJ11-1251
106
� '
ay Club Cupertino will replace a portion of the Sears store at Vallco Shopping all. It will add
approximately 77 A peak hour trips to the surrounding roadways, as the Sears store is not open at this
time period. owever, it will generate fewer daily trips �nd fewer P peak hour trips than the Sears store.
The intersections in the vicinity of the site will operate with the same levels of service with the addition of
ay Club tra ic; therefore it will not cause a significant effect on roadvtray operations under xisting plus
roject or Curnulative plus roject conditions.
The project site has good �ccess for pedestrians, bicyclists, �nd transit riders. It is reco mended that the
tvvo driveways on �tevens Creek oulevard be consolidated to reduce conflict points �nd aintain
acceptable operations.
All of the parking spaces at the all are shared a ong the tenants and the existing supply was designed
to accommodate a variety of uses including fitness club. There are ample available spaces near the ay
Club site and ay Club will �dd 80 spaces. Therefore the p�rking supply will be su icient to
accommodate ay Club Cupertino project. Cl�ss I�nd Class II bike parking facilities should be provided
on-site per unicipal Code Chapter 19.100.
—
108
Traffic Data Service
Campbell, CA
(408) 377-2988
tdsbay@cs.com File B�I�me : 3AM FBNAL
it oe : 0 03
tart at : /12/2 11
o :1
Grou s Printed- Vehicles
N. WOLFE RD VALLCO PKWY N. WOLFE RD VALLCO PKWY
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
S�.Irt T1TT10 Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Int. TOtal
07:00 AM 11 126 0 0 137 3 0 5 0 8 1 126 2 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 274
07:15 AM 29 157 0 0 186 8 0 11 1 20 1 231 21 0 253 0 0 0 2 2 461
07:30 AM 39 136 1 2 178 3 1 19 0 23 1 346 22 0 369 0 0 0 1 1 571
07:45 AM 24 165 5 1 195 3 1 20 1 25 4 244 5 1 254 0 0 0 1 1 475
Total 103 584 6 3 696 17 2 55 2 76 7 947 50 1 1005 0 0 0 4 4 1781
08:00 AM 35 204 2 1 242 4 1 15 0 20 1 248 16 0 265 0 0 1 3 4 531
08:15 AM 61 207 2 6 276 6 0 24 2 32 4 356 32 2 394 0 0 0 0 0 702
08:30 AM 47 164 4 8 223 2 0 12 1 15 1 357 31 0 389 1 0 0 0 1 628
08:45 AM 53 186 5 0 244 4 1 14 3 22 1 322 27 0 350 0 0 0 0 0 616
Total 196 761 13 15 985 16 2 65 6 89 7 1283 106 2 1398 1 0 1 3 5 2477
Grand Total 299 1345 19 18 1681 33 4 120 8 165 14 2230 156 3 2403 1 0 1 7 9 4258
Apprch % 17.8 80 1.1 1.1 20 2.4 72.7 4.8 0.6 92.8 6.5 0.1 11.1 0 11.1 77.8
Total % 7 31.6 0.4 0.4 39.5 0.8 0.1 2.8 0.2 3.9 0.3 52.4 3.7 0.1 56.4 0 0 0 0.2 0.2
N. WOLFE RD VALLCO PKWY N. WOLFE RD VALLCO PKWY
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
S�Irt T1TT10 I,Oft TI]I�U R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Int. TOtal
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 35 204 2 1 242 4 1 15 0 20 1 248 16 0 265 0 0 1 3 4 531
08:15 AM 61 207 2 6 276 6 0 24 2 32 4 356 32 2 394 0 0 0 0 0 702
08:30 AM 47 164 4 8 223 2 0 12 1 15 1 357 31 0 389 1 0 0 0 1 628
08:45 AM 53 186 5 0 244 4 1 14 3 22 1 322 27 0 350 0 0 0 0 0 616
Total Volume 196 761 13 15 985 16 2 65 6 89 7 1283 106 2 1398 1 0 1 3 5 2477
/ App. Total 19.9 77.3 1.3 1.5 18 2.2 73 6.7 0.5 91.8 7.6 0.1 20 0 20 60
PHF .803 .919 .650 .469 .892 .667 .500 .677 .500 .695 .438 .898 .828 .250 .887 .250 .000 .250 .250 .313 .882
109
Traffic Data Service
Campbell, CA
(408) 377-2988
tdsbay@cs.com File B�I�me : 3AM FBNAL
it oe : 0 03
tart at : /12/2 11
o :2
N. WO�FE RD
Out In Total
1349 985 2334
13 761 196 15
Right Thru Le� Peds
i I
i—' l
�r
�� r �� �
N T
�O J I � � o {�
o � North � "'
� in c� ��
d� � ��
O Peak Nour Begins at 08:00 AM ��
J r s r CO
J �
Q N � Vehicles � = �
> �� �
O "'� � �'�'m
�
d- � 07
� I �
�eft Thru Right Peds
7 1283 106 2
't'1H I39H 21't6
Out In Total
110
Traffic Data Service
Campbell, CA
(408) 377-2988
tdsbay@cs.com File B�I�me : 3AM FBNAL
it oe : 0 03
tart at : 1 /2/2
o :1
roups rinte - Vehiales
1/VOLFE FtD STE1lENS CREEK �LV� VtdC}LFE FtC� Sl'EVENS CREEK �LVD
outh ound estbound Northboun ast oun
,° TIYT12 Rlght ThCII Left PedS App. Tatal Righf ThYU L�ft PedS App. Tatal Right ThYU L��� PBdS App. Total Rlght IhCII Le�� PBdS App. Total Int. TOtal
06:00 AM 11 7 6 0 24 8 14 5 0 27 2 25 2 0 29 1 14 8 0 23 103
06:15 AM 15 9 6 0 30 3 24 1 0 28 5 42 10 0 57 3 18 13 0 34 149
06:30 AM 20 12 5 0 37 5 28 2 0 35 6 49 4 0 59 4 21 21 0 46 177
06:45 AM 37 23 10 0 70 14 53 3 0 70 1 55 10 0 66 4 23 14 0 41 247
Total 83 51 27 0 161 30 119 11 0 160 14 171 26 0 211 12 76 56 0 144 676
07:00 AM 43 29 37 0 109 17 80 2 0 99 11 99 9 0 119 8 51 28 0 87 414
07:15 AM 46 57 29 0 132 34 105 23 0 162 25 169 41 0 235 33 136 42 0 211 740
07:30 AM 48 57 17 0 122 44 188 32 0 264 6Q 250 42 0 352 22 102 67 0 191 929
07:45 AM 81 78 36 0 195 27 203 16 0 246 26 185 48 0 259 27 86 84 0 197 897
Total 218 221 119 0 558 122 576 73 0 771 122 703 140 0 965 90 375 221 0 686 2980
08:00 AM 84 56 38 0 178 27 233 26 0 286 23 146 44 0 213 27 97 64 0 188 865
08:15 AM 108 99 58 0 265 24 248 22 0 294 36 266 �8 0 350 25 124 130 0 279 1188
08:30 AM 101 56 49 0 206 31 224 11 0 266 35 288 52 0 375 17 147 128 0 292 1139
08:45 AM 122 49 57 0 228 43 222 10 0 275 27 203 56 0 286 16 148 131 0 295 1084
Tatal 415 260 202 0 877 125 927 69 0 1121 121 903 200 0 1224 85 516 453 0 1054 4276
Grand Tatal 716 532 34$ 0 1596 277 1622 153 4 2052 257 1777 366 0 2404 187 967 730 0 1884 7932
Apprch °l0 44.9 33.3 21.8 0 13.5 79 7.5 0 10.7 74 15.2 0 9.9 51.3 38.7 0
iotal °l0 9 6.7 4.4 4 20.1 3.5 24.4 1.9 4 25.9 3.2 22.4 4.6 0 34.3 2.4 12.2 9.2 0 23.8
LFE ST lf S C E LV L STEVE 5 C E LV
South ound estbound Northboun ast oun
�t2t� IIIT18 Right Thru Left Peds App. Tatal Right Thru Left Peds App. Tatal Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Haur far Entire Intersectian Begins et 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 84 56 38 0 178 27 233 26 0 286 23 146 44 0 213 27 97 64 0 188 865
08:15 AM 108 99 58 0 265 24 2 8 22 0 294 36 266 48 0 350 25 124 130 0 279 11�8
08:30 AM 101 56 49 0 206 31 224 11 0 266 35 2 52 0 375 17 147 128 0 292 1139
08:45 AM 122 49 57 0 228 3 222 10 0 275 27 203 56 0 286 16 148 131 0 295 1084
Total Volume 415 26C7 2C72 0 877 125 927 69 0 1121 121 903 2007 C7 1224 85 516 453 C7 1054 4276
! App. Total 47.3 29.6 23 0 11.2 82.7 6.2 0 9.9 73.8 16.3 0 8.1 49 43 0
PHF 850 .657 .871 000 827 .727 .934 .663 .000 953 .840 .784 .893 .000 816 .787 .872 .865 .000 893 900
111
Traffic Data Service
Campbell, CA
(408) 377-2988
tdsbay@cs.com File B�I�me : 3AM FBNAL
it oe : 0 03
tart at : 1 /2/2
o :2
WC}LFE RD
Out In Total
1481 877 2358
415 260 202 0
Right Thru Le� Peds
i I
i—' l
�r
� � � � �
� ��s
�`" 0 N `� J � �" N � O
J f ,-" C3l W ,�-.
m � � North � c°
W � �n _c� �� c�o
� �� ~ � �
� � Peak Nour Begins at 08:00 AM N�
�j � c° s m
W N � Vehicles � = �
> �� �
���.r� o� � �o
� wm
� � °-� o—
� I �
�eft Thru Right Peds
200 903 121 0
414 1224 1638
Out In Total
112
Traffic Data Service
Campbell, CA
(408) 377-2988
tdsbay@cs.com File B�I�me : 4AM FBNAL
it oe : 0 04
tart at : /12/2 11
o :1
Grou s Printed- Vehicles
PERIMETER RD STEVENS CREEK BLVD PERIMETER RD STEVENS CREEK BLVD
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
S�.Irt T1TT10 Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Int. TOtal
07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 124 0 0 126 0 0 0 1 1 0 94 0 0 94 221
07:15 AM 1 0 0 0 1 6 178 2 0 186 0 0 2 3 5 1 220 0 0 221 413
07:30 AM 0 0 3 0 3 8 264 2 0 274 0 0 2 3 5 0 129 0 0 129 411
07:45 AM 0 0 0 2 2 8 303 1 3 315 0 0 1 6 7 1 128 0 0 129 453
Total 1 0 3 2 6 24 869 5 3 901 0 0 5 13 18 2 571 0 0 573 1498
08:00 AM 3 0 1 2 6 10 443 3 0 456 2 1 4 4 11 2 184 3 0 189 662
08:15 AM 3 0 1 2 6 11 339 3 0 353 3 0 4 2 9 1 239 2 0 242 610
08:30 AM 3 0 6 2 11 20 300 4 0 324 4 1 8 2 15 1 222 3 0 226 576
08:45 AM 4 0 4 2 10 11 301 4 0 316 1 0 5 2 8 3 235 2 0 240 574
Total 13 0 12 8 33 52 1383 14 0 1449 10 2 21 10 43 7 880 10 0 897 2422
Grand Total 14 0 15 10 39 76 2252 19 3 2350 10 2 26 23 61 9 1451 10 0 1470 3920
Apprch % 35.9 0 38.5 25.6 3.2 95.8 0.8 0.1 16.4 3.3 42.6 37.7 0.6 98.7 0.7 0
Total % 0.4 0 0.4 0.3 1 1.9 57.4 0.5 0.1 59.9 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.6 1.6 0.2 37 0.3 0 37.5
PERIMETER RD STEVENS CREEK BLVD PERIMETER RD STEVENS CREEK BLVD
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
S�Irt T1TT10 I,Oft TI]I�U R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Int. TOtal
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 3 0 1 2 6 10 443 3 0 456 2 1 4 4 11 2 184 3 0 189 662
08:15 AM 3 0 1 2 6 11 339 3 0 353 3 0 4 2 9 1 239 2 0 242 610
08:30 AM 3 0 6 2 11 20 300 4 0 324 4 1 8 2 15 1 222 3 0 226 576
08:45 AM 4 0 4 2 10 11 301 4 0 316 1 0 5 2 8 3 235 2 0 240 574
Total Volume 13 0 12 8 33 52 1383 14 0 1449 10 2 21 10 43 7 880 10 0 897 2422
/ App. Total 39.4 0 36.4 24.2 3.6 95.4 1 0 23.3 4.7 48.8 23.3 0.8 98.1 1.1 0
PHF .813 .000 .500 1.000 .750 .650 .780 .875 .000 .794 .625 .500 .656 .625 .717 .583 .921 .833 .000 .927 .915
113
Traffic Data Service
Campbell, CA
(408) 377-2988
tdsbay@cs.com File B�I�me : 4AM FBNAL
it oe : 0 04
tart at : /12/2 11
o :2
PERIfvIEf ER RD
Out In Total
23 33 56
12 0 13 8
Right Thru Le� Peds
i I
i—' l
�r
� N r` �7
0 T
� �O N J I � � �{�
m o � North � A �'
t � �ro c� �� m
� c � F � o'
� Peak Nour Begins at 08:00 AM ��
� ° s r c�o
W � r � Vehicles �`� �
�� oN � �o
° 07 m
�
� � �-� ca—
� I �
�eft Thru Right Peds
10 2 21 10
62 0 105
Out In Total
114
� � :-� . � '' -'
� � r � '• � � . , _ ._.� _
�. . - � -. � . _ ■ - _ �,
_ `� • �
�
_
I
Traffic Data Service
Campbell, CA
(408) 377-2988
tdsbay@cs.com File N�m� : AM DRI�iEWAY FBNAL
it o : 0 0 1
t rt t : /12/2 11
o :1
roups rinte - Vechicles
�RIVEWAY 1 �RIVEVt1AY 2
outh ound estbound Northboun ast oun
,° TIYT12 L2�� ThCII Rlghf PedS App. Tatal �N dUT App. Tatal �N dUT App. Total ��ft IhCII Rlght PBdS App. Total Int. TOtal
07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4
Total 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 6 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 9
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 5 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 8
Grand Tatal 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 0 0 11 2 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 17
Apprch °� 0 Q 0 0 72.7 27.3 0 0 33.3 66.7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total °fo 0 0 0 0 0 47.1 17.6 0 0 64.7 11.8 23.5 0 0 35.3 0 0 0 0 0
IV AY 1 IV AY 2
Southbcaund Westbound Northbound Eastbound
.�7�aC� �II11� Lef� Th u Rl�ht �GdS App. Total �N QUT App. Total �N QUT App. Tatal ��ft Thru Rl�ht P81�5 App. Tatal (nt. TOta)
Peak Naur Anelysis Fram 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peek 1 af 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 Q 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 6 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 9
f App. Total 0 0 0 0 66.7 33.3 0 0 33.3 66.7 0 0 0 0 0 0
P H F 000 .000 .000 .000 000 .500 .500 .000 .000 750 .250 .500 .000 .000 .375 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 563
116
Traffic Data Service
Campbell, CA
(408) 377-2988
tdsbay@cs.com File N�m� : AM DRI�iEWAY FBNAL
it o : 0 0 1
t rt t : /12/2 11
o :2
Out In Total
0 � 0
0 0 0 0
Right Thru Le� Peds
i I
i—' l
�r
�� o �� T �
�
�O J I � o �{�
o North
�
o c� �C
c � � iv
— Peak Nour Begins at 07:00 AM �
o� �
� � Vechicles � �
� � �
� � - 0 0
� � �
� �� �_
� I �
IN OUT Right Peds
1 2 0 0
0 0 0
Out In Total
117
Traffic Data Service
Campbell, CA
(408) 377-2988
tdsbay@cs.com File B�I�me : 1 PM FBNAL
it oe : 0 01
tart at : 11 / l2 1
o :1
roups rinte - Vehiales
N. WOLFE RD STE1lENS CREEK �LV� fUIILLER AVE Sl'EVENS CREEK �LVD
outh ound estbound Northboun ast oun
,° TIYT12 Rlght ThCII Left PedS App. Tatal Righf ThYU L�ft PedS App. Tatal Right ThYU L��� PBdS App. Total Rlght IhCII Le�� PBdS App. Total Int. TOtal
04:00 PM 67 109 69 3 248 16 118 22 5 161 14 71 38 2 125 30 170 101 0 301 835
04:15 PM 75 104 65 3 247 35 137 24 2 198 13 54 34 4 105 41 190 91 3 325 875
04:30 PM 83 121 57 6 267 35 116 28 3 182 16 69 31 0 116 26 193 106 10 335 900
04:45 PM 100 171 42 3 316 38 139 25 3 205 17 88 28 0 133 36 188 102 6 332 986
Total 325 505 233 15 1078 124 510 99 13 746 60 282 131 6 479 133 741 400 19 1293 3596
05:00 PM 107 168 63 1 339 35 171 52 4 262 25 80 36 2 143 36 199 107 0 342 1086
05:15 PM 114 169 76 2 361 33 169 50 3 255 17 74 30 1 122 39 244 135 3 421 1159
05:30 PM 144 208 88 7 447 34 208 51 3 296 14 89 32 2 137 33 263 130 3 429 1309
05:45 PM 123 199 92 2 416 50 173 37 1 261 8 97 50 3 158 42 221 118 8 389 1224
Total 488 744 319 12 1563 152 721 190 11 1074 64 340 148 8 560 150 927 490 14 1581 4778
06:00 PM 126 228 80 1 435 31 178 25 0 234 14 100 33 5 152 27 203 125 5 360 1181
06:15 PM 104 178 65 3 350 40 199 37 1 277 11 69 34 0 114 31 223 102 1 357 1098
06:30 PM 95 200 105 2 402 33 167 41 0 241 16 84 29 0 129 40 225 139 1 405 1177
06:45 PM 95 214 130 0 439 33 133 36 0 202 14 79 35 0 128 37 224 113 0 374 1143
Tatal 420 820 380 6 1626 137 677 139 1 954 55 332 131 5 523 135 875 479 7 1496 4599
Grand Tatal 1233 2069 932 33 4267 413 1908 428 25 2774 179 954 410 19 1562 418 2543 1369 40 4374 12973
Apprch °l0 28.9 48.5 21.8 0.8 14.9 68.8 15.4 0.9 11.5 61.1 26.2 1.2 9.6 58.2 31.3 0.9
iotal °l0 9.5 15.9 7.2 4.3 32.9 3.2 14.7 3.3 4.2 21.4 1.4 7.4 3.2 0.1 12 3.2 19.6 10.6 0.3 33.7
. L E ST lf S C E LV ILL V STEVE 5 C E LV
South ound estbound Northboun ast oun
�t2t� IIIT18 Right Thru Left Peds App. Tatal Right Thru Left Peds App. Tatal Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Haur far Entire Intersectian Begins et 05:15 PM
05:15 PM 114 169 76 2 361 33 169 50 3 255 17 74 30 1 122 39 244 135 3 421 1159
05:30 PM 144 208 88 7 447 34 208 51 3 296 14 89 32 2 137 33 263 130 3 429 1309
05:45 PM 123 199 92 2 416 50 173 37 1 261 8 97 50 3 158 42 221 118 8 389 1224
06:00 PM 126 228 80 1 435 31 178 25 0 234 14 100 33 5 152 27 203 125 5 360 1181
Total Volume 5C77 804 336 12 1659 148 728 163 7 1 C746 53 360 145 11 569 141 931 5C78 19 1599 4873
! App. Total 30.6 48.5 20.3 0.7 14.1 69.6 15.6 0.7 9.3 63.3 25.5 1.9 8.8 58.2 31.8 1.2
PHF 880 .882 .913 .429 928 .740 .875 .799 .583 883 .779 .900 .725 .550 900 .839 .885 .941 594 932 931
118
Traffic Data Service
Campbell, CA
(408) 377-2988
tdsbay@cs.com File B�I�me : 1 PM FBNAL
it oe : 0 01
tart at : 11 / l2 1
o :2
N. WO�FE RD
Out In Total
1016 1659 2675
507 804 336 12
Right Thru Le� Peds
i I
i-' l
�r
� � � � �
r � o _'_' �
�' � N � J 1 I �' P G 1�
J F" I �-^ O� N�
m North ° �
� m� a
w c rn rn _c� �� �
� �
��`� Peak Nour Begins at 05:15 PM � ��
� d s r o7
m -s
W o r � Vehicles � � �
� O � `�' `� c � o c,' °
`- ° 07 m
�
� � �- � 07 -
� I �
�eft Thru Right Peds
145 360 53 11
110H �69 16't't
Out In Total
119
Traffic Data Service
Campbell, CA
(408) 377-2988
tdsbay@cs.com File N�m� : PM DRI�iEWAY FBNAL
it o : 0 0 1
t rt t : /12/2 11
o :1
Grou s Printed- Vehicles
DRIVEWAY 1 DRIVEWAY 2
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
S�.Irt T1TT10 IN T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total IN DUT App. Total IN DUT App. Total Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Int. TOtal
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 4 0 0 16 1 6 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 23
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 12 1 6 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 19
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 11 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 14
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 6 0 0 19 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 23
Total 0 0 0 0 0 43 15 0 0 58 2 19 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 79
06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 6 0 0 18 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 26
06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 12 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 16
06:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 5 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 13
06:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 0 0 11 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 18
Total 0 0 0 0 0 32 14 0 0 46 0 27 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 73
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 75 29 0 0 104 2 46 0 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 152
Apprch % 0 0 0 0 72.1 27.9 0 0 4.2 95.8 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total % 0 0 0 0 0 49.3 19.1 0 0 68.4 1.3 30.3 0 0 31.6 0 0 0 0 0
DRIVEWAY 1 DRIVEWAY 2
Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
S�Irt T1TT10 IN TI]I�U R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total IN �UT App. Total IN �UT App. Total Left T17111 R1�lY POCIS ppp. Total Int. TOtal
Peak Hour Analysis From 05:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:15 PM
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 3 0 0 12 1 6 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 19
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 11 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 14
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 13 6 0 0 19 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 23
06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 12 6 0 0 18 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 26
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 43 17 0 0 60 1 21 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 82
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 71.7 28.3 0 0 4.5 95.5 0 0 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .827 .708 .000 .000 .789 .250 .656 .000 .000 .688 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .788
120
Traffic Data Service
Campbell, CA
(408) 377-2988
tdsbay@cs.com File N�m� : PM DRI�iEWAY FBNAL
it o : 0 0 1
t rt t : /12/2 11
o :2
Out In Total
21 0 21
0 0 0 0
Right Thru I � Peds
i I
i—' l
�r
�� o �� T �
�
�O J I � o �{�
o North
�
o c� �C �
c � � -.i
— o Peak Nour Begins at 05:15 PM ��
s o
O� � � Vehicles � �
°� �� ��
� I �
IN OUT Right Peds
1 21 0 0
0 22 65
Out In Total
121
122
�
�
N OI? ��U X X X
�
a Q U (� N X X X �
J
4
� � X X X �
� 7 ?: X ?: �
C. W
(� W
r a
{T � U X X X �
Q � N X X X =
W
LL
O
Cn �
p r o r �
J
N
U
J
N
m � � � X X X
Q� � Z X X X
�
m� � U X X X
dU 6 u�i x x
X X X
N
OJ X X
� � = X X X
� ?: X ?:
r
r
r
� � x x x
� 7 ?: X X
{T � U X X
N
Q � N, X 7C X
�, Cn
�a p r o r
05 J
6
m
V
m ,� � '�j N h oJ
� Q U 6 u�i � � a �
U
�
w
m �
o `[ ? z '� U c� u' cri o
N ��� G[ � j 7 N h C " J Uy
c"�.i a� ar `�r� � a d ci o 4
a M� o Q � o�
0
� � Z OS � �UJ ST ��U I�- Gl O �
� X S N
N p U a" � W Q � N O� 4�t �
ta Cl � Q ' O
� �- N � N
d = � + U.
� 0 � � Q � 0�
U m
o -
�
`m o
N W , � 'U r C1 .# (�
cn Q U 6 u�i st � a �
�
E
� 'J U � o �
(/} � � 7 N h t'"J
Q O O O
W
X Cn - U h 65
N `$ � r
W q 6 u � �
p q � m
J
4
�
� �
} Q1
m U
�
m a�
U ai
N � �
� Q a
0
� � U
O =
� 2 �
� � �
� � � �
W d �S � O
a . O p
a � �
U � u. � u �
_ H
123
COMPARE Mon May 02 14:4623 2011 Page 3-1
Project Name
Project Number
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #1: Perimeter Rd/Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=PermiURights=lnclude
Final Vol: 12 0 13"'
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
� � � � �
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude VoI Cnt Date: 4/12/2011 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol:
Cycle Time (sec): 110
7"' 2 � 0 14
O � Loss Time (sec): 9 � 1
880 2 � Critical V/C: 0.282 � 2 1383"'
1 � Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 4.7 � 0
10 0 � Avg Delay (sec/veh): 8.4 � 1 52
LOS: A
� � � � �
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol: 10 2 21
Signal=PermiURights=lnclude
Street Name: Perimeter Rd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Volume Module: » Count Date: 12 Apr 2011 GG 8:OOam
Base Vol: 10 2 21 13 0 12 7 880 10 52 1383 14
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 10 2 21 13 0 12 7 880 10 52 1383 14
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 10 2 21 13 0 12 7 880 10 52 1383 14
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 10 2 21 13 0 12 7 880 10 52 1383 14
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 2 21 13 0 12 7 880 10 52 1383 14
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 10 2 21 13 0 12 7 880 10 52 1383 14
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 0.83 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 2.97 0.03 1.00 2.97 0.03
Final Sat.: 1500 300 1750 1800 0 1750 3150 5537 63 1750 5544 56
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.25 0.25
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 7.0 65.0 65.0 26.0 84.0 84.0
Volume/Cap: 0.07 0.07 0.13 0.08 0.00 0.08 0.03 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.33 0.33
Delay/Veh: 46.0 46.0 46.4 46.0 0.0 46.0 48.4 11.0 11.0 33.2 4.1 4.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 46.0 46.0 46.4 46.0 0.0 46.0 48.4 11.0 11.0 33.2 4.1 4.1
LOS by Move: D D D D A D D B+ B+ C- A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 5 1 5 5
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Do li ssociates, Inc. Licensed to FEHR & PEERS WALNUT CRK
COMPARE Mon May 02 14:4623 2011 Page 3-2
Project Name
Project Number
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing+pj qM
Intersection #1: Perimeter Rd/Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=PermiURights=lnclude
FinalVol: 14 0 21"'
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
� � � � �
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude VoI Cnt Date: 4/12/2011 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol:
Cycle Time (sec): 110
14"' 2 0 14
O � Loss Time (sec): 9 � 1
880 2 � Critical V/C: 0.291 � 2 1390"'
1 � Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 5.2 � 0
10 0 � Avg Delay (sec/veh): 8.7 � 1 52
LOS: A
� � � � �
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol: 10 2 21
Signal=PermiURights=lnclude
Street Name: Perimeter Rd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Volume Module: » Count Date: 12 Apr 2011 GG 8:OOam
Base Vol: 10 2 21 13 0 12 7 880 10 52 1383 14
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 10 2 21 13 0 12 7 880 10 52 1383 14
Added Vol: 0 0 0 8 0 2 7 0 0 0 7 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 10 2 21 21 0 14 14 880 10 52 1390 14
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 10 2 21 21 0 14 14 880 10 52 1390 14
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 2 21 21 0 14 14 880 10 52 1390 14
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 10 2 21 21 0 14 14 880 10 52 1390 14
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 0.83 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 2.97 0.03 1.00 2.97 0.03
Final Sat.: 1500 300 1750 1800 0 1750 3150 5537 63 1750 5544 56
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.25 0.25
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 7.0 65.0 65.0 26.0 84.0 84.0
Volume/Cap: 0.07 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.09 0.07 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.33 0.33
Delay/Veh: 46.0 46.0 46.4 46.3 0.0 46.1 48.6 11.0 11.0 33.2 4.1 4.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 46.0 46.0 46.4 46.3 0.0 46.1 48.6 11.0 11.0 33.2 4.1 4.1
LOS by Move: D D D D A D D B+ B+ C- A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 5 5 1 5 5
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Do li ssociates, Inc. Licensed to FEHR & PEERS WALNUT CRK
COMPARE Mon May 02 14:4623 2011 Page 33
Project Name
Project Number
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #2: Wolfe Rd-Miller Ave/Stevens Creek Blvd
S ig nal=ProtecURig hts=lg nore
Final Vol: 0 260 2p2"'
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1
� � � � �
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude VoI Cnt Date: 10/2/2008 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol:
Cycle Time (sec): 110
453"' 2 0 125
O � Loss Time (sec): 12 � 1
516 3 � Critical V/C: 0707 � 2 g27"'
0 � Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 40.3 � 0
85 1 � Avg Delay (sec/veh): 38.7 � 2 69
LOS: D+
� � � � �
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol: 200 903"' 121
Signal=ProtecURights=lnclude
Street Name: Wolfe Rd-Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Volume Module: » Count Date: 2 Oct 2008 GG 8:OOam
Base Vol: 200 903 121 202 260 415 453 516 85 69 927 125
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 200 903 121 202 260 415 453 516 85 69 927 125
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 200 903 121 202 260 415 453 516 85 69 927 125
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 200 903 121 202 260 0 453 516 85 69 927 125
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 200 903 121 202 260 0 453 516 85 69 927 125
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 200 903 121 202 260 0 453 516 85 69 927 125
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.63 0.37 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.63 0.37
Final Sat.: 1750 4937 662 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4934 665
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.07 0.00 0.14 0.09 0.05 0.02 0.19 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 25.8 28.4 28.4 18.0 20.6 0.0 22.4 30.4 30.4 21.2 29.2 29.2
Volume/Cap: 0.49 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.37 0.00 0.71 0.33 0.18 0.11 0.71 0.71
Delay/Veh: 37.3 38.6 38.6 51.4 39.4 0.0 44.4 31.8 30.5 36.7 38.1 38.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 37.3 38.6 38.6 51.4 39.4 0.0 44.4 31.8 30.5 36.7 38.1 38.1
LOS by Move: D+ D+ D+ D- D A D C C D+ D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 12 12 8 4 0 9 4 2 1 12 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Do li ssociates, Inc. Licensed to FEHR & PEERS WALNUT CRK
COMPARE Mon May 02 14:4623 2011 Page 3-4
Project Name
Project Number
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing+pj qM
Intersection #2: Wolfe Rd-Miller Ave/Stevens Creek Blvd
S ig nal=ProtecURig hts=lg nore
FinalVol: 0 263 21p"'
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1
� � � � �
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude VoI Cnt Date: 10/2/2008 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol:
Cycle Time (sec): 110
455"' 2 0 125
O � Loss Time (sec): 12 � 1
521 3 � Critical V/C: 0.715 � 2 g37"'
0 � Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 40.7 � 0
86 1 � Avg Delay (sec/veh): 38.9 � 2 69
LOS: D+
� � � � �
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol: 203 903"' 121
Signal=ProtecURights=lnclude
Street Name: Wolfe Rd-Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Volume Module: » Count Date: 2 Oct 2008 GG 8:OOam
Base Vol: 200 903 121 202 260 415 453 516 85 69 927 125
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 200 903 121 202 260 415 453 516 85 69 927 125
Added Vol: 3 0 0 8 3 0 2 5 1 0 10 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 203 903 121 210 263 415 455 521 86 69 937 125
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 203 903 121 210 263 0 455 521 86 69 937 125
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 203 903 121 210 263 0 455 521 86 69 937 125
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 203 903 121 210 263 0 455 521 86 69 937 125
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.63 0.37 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.63 0.37
Final Sat.: 1750 4937 662 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4940 659
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.07 0.00 0.14 0.09 0.05 0.02 0.19 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 26.1 28.1 28.1 18.5 20.5 0.0 22.2 30.3 30.3 21.1 29.2 29.2
Volume/Cap: 0.49 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.37 0.00 0.72 0.33 0.18 0.11 0.72 0.72
Delay/Veh: 37.1 39.0 39.0 51.4 39.5 0.0 44.8 31.9 30.5 36.8 38.3 38.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 37.1 39.0 39.0 51.4 39.5 0.0 44.8 31.9 30.5 36.8 38.3 38.3
LOS by Move: D+ D D D- D A D C C D+ D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 12 12 9 4 0 9 4 2 1 12 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Do li ssociates, Inc. Licensed to FEHR & PEERS WALNUT CRK
COMPARE Mon May 02 14:4623 2011 Page 3-5
Project Name
Project Number
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #3: Wolfe Rd/Vallco Pkwy
S ig nal=ProtecURig hts=lg nore
FinalVol: 0 761 1g6"'
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 2
� � � � �
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude VoI Cnt Date: 4/12/2011 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol:
Cycle Time (sec): 120
1••• 1 1 65•••
O � Loss Time (sec): 12 � O
0 1 � Critical V/C: 0.387 � 1 2
0 � Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 18.4 � 0
1 1 � Avg Delay (sec/veh): 17.9 � 2 16
LOS: B
� � � � �
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol: 7 12g3"' 106
Signal=ProtecURights=lnclude
Street Name: Wolfe Rd Vallco Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Volume Module: » Count Date: 12 Apr 2011 GG 8:OOam
Base Vol: 7 1283 106 196 761 13 1 0 1 16 2 65
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 7 1283 106 196 761 13 1 0 1 16 2 65
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 7 1283 106 196 761 13 1 0 1 16 2 65
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 7 1283 106 196 761 0 1 0 1 16 2 65
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 7 1283 106 196 761 0 1 0 1 16 2 65
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 7 1283 106 196 761 0 1 0 1 16 2 65
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.76 0.24 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5172 427 3150 5700 1750 1750 1900 1750 3150 1900 1750
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.04
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 27.4 72.1 72.1 18.1 62.8 0.0 7.0 0.0 7.0 17.6 10.8 10.8
Volume/Cap: 0.02 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.26 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.41
Delay/Veh: 35.9 12.8 12.8 46.7 15.8 0.0 53.3 0.0 53.3 43.9 49.8 53.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 35.9 12.8 12.8 46.7 15.8 0.0 53.3 0.0 53.3 43.9 49.8 53.4
LOS by Move: D+ B B D B A D- A D- D D D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 9 9 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Do li ssociates, Inc. Licensed to FEHR & PEERS WALNUT CRK
COMPARE Mon May 02 14:4623 2011 Page 3-6
Project Name
Project Number
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing+pj qM
Intersection #3: Wolfe Rd/Vallco Pkwy
S ig nal=ProtecURig hts=lg nore
FinalVol: 0 775 1g6"'
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 2
� � � � �
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude VoI Cnt Date: 4/12/2011 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol:
Cycle Time (sec): 120
16••• 1 1 65•••
O � Loss Time (sec): 12 � O
0 1 � Critical V/C: 0.397 � 1 2
0 � Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 18.8 � 0
1 1 � Avg Delay (sec/veh): 18.0 � 2 16
LOS: B-
� � � � �
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol: 7 12g5"' 106
Signal=ProtecURights=lnclude
Street Name: Wolfe Rd Vallco Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Volume Module: » Count Date: 12 Apr 2011 GG 8:OOam
Base Vol: 7 1283 106 196 761 13 1 0 1 16 2 65
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 7 1283 106 196 761 13 1 0 1 16 2 65
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 14 0 15 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 7 1285 106 196 775 13 16 0 1 16 2 65
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 7 1285 106 196 775 0 16 0 1 16 2 65
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 7 1285 106 196 775 0 16 0 1 16 2 65
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 7 1285 106 196 775 0 16 0 1 16 2 65
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.76 0.24 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5173 427 3150 5700 1750 1750 1900 1750 3150 1900 1750
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.14 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.04
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 27.1 72.1 72.1 18.1 63.1 0.0 7.0 0.0 7.0 17.6 10.8 10.8
Volume/Cap: 0.02 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.26 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.41
Delay/Veh: 36.1 12.8 12.8 46.7 15.6 0.0 54.4 0.0 53.3 43.9 49.8 53.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 36.1 12.8 12.8 46.7 15.6 0.0 54.4 0.0 53.3 43.9 49.8 53.4
LOS by Move: D+ B B D B A D- A D- D D D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 9 9 4 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 3
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Do li ssociates, Inc. Licensed to FEHR & PEERS WALNUT CRK
�
�
N OI? ��U X X X
�
a Q U (� N X X X �
J
4
� � X X X �
� 7 ?: X ?: �
C. W
(� W
r a
{T � U X X X �
Q � N X X X =
W
LL
O
Cn �
p r o r �
J
N
U
J
N
m � � � X X X
Q� � Z X X X
�
m� � U X X X
dU 6 u�i x x
X X X
N
OJ X X
� � = X X X
� ?: X ?:
r
r
r�
� � x x x
� 7 ?: X X
{T � U X X
N
Q � N, X 7C X
�, Cn
�a p r o r
05 J
6
m
V
m ,� � '�j � h I�-
U
� Q C� 6 N�.(} d' N
W
� �
O � � Q � � N � � p
N �> C"J h- uJ
t"�J N N >� � �'} d O O �
4
° � o�
� M � o Q o �
,? Z z m� � o� — �ci a� °_ c,°a S
�
N p U �� U Q � N o� � N (�
ta Cl � Q'� m p
� �- N � N
d = � U .
� U� O Q r� U �;
o�
o —
�
`m o
N OI ,� �'U „�. N i.C} O
cn Q U 6 u � �
G �"
d� N
�
� Q w � C`NJ � u „�. 'J
�
� � '} O O O
O
�
U Cn � �U (O oJ N
m q 6 u o� ° ra' c�v
p Q r� U
J
4
�
� �
} Q1
m U
�
m a�
U ai
N � �
� Q a
0
� � U
O =
� 2 �
� � �
� � � �
W d �S � O
a . O p
a � �
U � u. � u �
_ H
130
COMPARE Mon May 02 14:50:37 2011 Page 3-1
Project Name
Project Number
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Background AM
Intersection #1: Perimeter Rd/Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=PermiURights=lnclude
Final Vol: 24 0 16"'
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
� � � � �
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude VoI Cnt Date: 4/12/2011 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol:
Cycle Time (sec): 110
24"' 2 � 0 18
O � Loss Time (sec): 9 � 1
1018 2 � Critical V/C: 0.321 � 2 1538"'
1 � Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 5.4 � 0
10 0 � Avg Delay (sec/veh): 8.6 � 1 52
LOS: A
� � � � �
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol: 10 2 21
Signal=PermiURights=lnclude
Street Name: Perimeter Rd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Volume Module: » Count Date: 12 Apr 2011 GG 8:OOam
Base Vol: 10 2 21 13 0 12 7 880 10 52 1383 14
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 10 2 21 13 0 12 7 880 10 52 1383 14
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ATI: 0 0 0 3 0 12 17 138 0 0 155 4
Initial Fut: 10 2 21 16 0 24 24 1018 10 52 1538 18
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 10 2 21 16 0 24 24 1018 10 52 1538 18
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 2 21 16 0 24 24 1018 10 52 1538 18
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 10 2 21 16 0 24 24 1018 10 52 1538 18
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 0.83 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 2.97 0.03 1.00 2.96 0.04
Final Sat.: 1500 300 1750 1800 0 1750 3150 5545 54 1750 5535 65
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.03 0.28 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 7.0 67.6 67.6 23.4 84.0 84.0
Volume/Cap: 0.07 0.07 0.13 0.10 0.00 0.15 0.12 0.30 0.30 0.14 0.36 0.36
Delay/Veh: 46.0 46.0 46.4 46.1 0.0 46.5 48.9 10.1 10.1 35.3 4.3 4.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 46.0 46.0 46.4 46.1 0.0 46.5 48.9 10.1 10.1 35.3 4.3 4.3
LOS by Move: D D D D A D D B+ B+ D+ A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 5 5 1 6 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Do I' ssociates, Inc. Licensed to FEHR & PEERS WALNUT CRK
COMPARE Mon May 02 14:50:37 2011 Page 3-2
Project Name
Project Number
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Background+pj qM
Intersection #1: Perimeter Rd/Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=PermiURights=lnclude
Final Vol: 26 0 2q"'
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
� � � � �
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude VoI Cnt Date: 4/12/2011 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol:
Cycle Time (sec): 110
31"' 2 0 18
O � Loss Time (sec): 9 � 1
1018 2 � Critical V/C: 0.329 � 2 1545"'
1 � Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 5.8 � 0
10 0 � Avg Delay (sec/veh): 8.8 � 1 52
LOS: A
� � � � �
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol: 10 2 21
Signal=PermiURights=lnclude
Street Name: Perimeter Rd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Volume Module: » Count Date: 12 Apr 2011 GG 8:OOam
Base Vol: 10 2 21 13 0 12 7 880 10 52 1383 14
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 10 2 21 13 0 12 7 880 10 52 1383 14
Added Vol: 0 0 0 8 0 2 7 0 0 0 7 0
ATI: 0 0 0 3 0 12 17 138 0 0 155 4
Initial Fut: 10 2 21 24 0 26 31 1018 10 52 1545 18
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 10 2 21 24 0 26 31 1018 10 52 1545 18
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 2 21 24 0 26 31 1018 10 52 1545 18
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 10 2 21 24 0 26 31 1018 10 52 1545 18
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 0.83 0.17 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 2.97 0.03 1.00 2.96 0.04
Final Sat.: 1500 300 1750 1800 0 1750 3150 5545 54 1750 5535 64
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.03 0.28 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 7.0 67.6 67.6 23.4 84.0 84.0
Volume/Cap: 0.07 0.07 0.13 0.15 0.00 0.16 0.15 0.30 0.30 0.14 0.37 0.37
Delay/Veh: 46.0 46.0 46.4 46.5 0.0 46.6 49.1 10.1 10.1 35.3 4.3 4.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 46.0 46.0 46.4 46.5 0.0 46.6 49.1 10.1 10.1 35.3 4.3 4.3
LOS by Move: D D D D A D D B+ B+ D+ A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 5 5 1 6 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Do I' ssociates, Inc. Licensed to FEHR & PEERS WALNUT CRK
COMPARE Mon May 02 14:50:37 2011 Page 33
Project Name
Project Number
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Background AM
Intersection #2: Wolfe Rd-Miller Ave/Stevens Creek Blvd
S ig nal=ProtecURig hts=lg nore
Final Vol: 0 286 22p"'
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1
� � � � �
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude VoI Cnt Date: 10/2/2008 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol:
Cycle Time (sec): 110
482"' 2 0 141
O � Loss Time (sec): 12 � 1
628 3 � Critical V/C: 0769 � 2 1054"'
0 � Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 42.2 � 0
85 1 � Avg Delay (sec/veh): 39.8 � 2 83
LOS: D
� � � � �
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol: 200 gq2"' 136
Signal=ProtecURights=lnclude
Street Name: Wolfe Rd-Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Volume Module: » Count Date: 2 Oct 2008 GG 8:OOam
Base Vol: 200 903 121 202 260 415 453 516 85 69 927 125
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 200 903 121 202 260 415 453 516 85 69 927 125
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ATI: 0 39 15 18 26 32 29 112 0 14 127 16
Initial Fut: 200 942 136 220 286 447 482 628 85 83 1054 141
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 200 942 136 220 286 0 482 628 85 83 1054 141
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 200 942 136 220 286 0 482 628 85 83 1054 141
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 200 942 136 220 286 0 482 628 85 83 1054 141
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.61 0.39 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.63 0.37
Final Sat.: 1750 4893 706 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4938 661
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.19 0.19 0.13 0.08 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.05 0.03 0.21 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 25.4 27.6 27.6 18.0 20.2 0.0 21.9 33.2 33.2 19.2 30.5 30.5
Volume/Cap: 0.50 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.41 0.00 0.77 0.36 0.16 0.15 0.77 0.77
Delay/Veh: 37.7 40.9 40.9 55.9 40.0 0.0 47.4 30.2 28.3 38.6 38.9 38.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 37.7 40.9 40.9 55.9 40.0 0.0 47.4 30.2 28.3 38.6 38.9 38.9
LOS by Move: D+ D D E+ D A D C C D+ D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 13 13 10 5 0 10 5 2 1 14 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Do I' ssociates, Inc. Licensed to FEHR & PEERS WALNUT CRK
COMPARE Mon May 02 14:50:37 2011 Page 3-4
Project Name
Project Number
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Background+pj qM
Intersection #2: Wolfe Rd-Miller Ave/Stevens Creek Blvd
S ig nal=ProtecURig hts=lg nore
Final Vol: 0 2gg 228"'
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1
� � � � �
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude VoI Cnt Date: 10/2/2008 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol:
Cycle Time (sec): 110
484"' 2 0 141
O � Loss Time (sec): 12 � 1
633 3 � Critical V/C: 0.776 � 2 1064"'
0 � Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 42.7 � 0
86 1 � Avg Delay (sec/veh): 40.1 � 2 83
LOS: D
� � � � �
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol: 203 gq2"' 136
Signal=ProtecURights=lnclude
Street Name: Wolfe Rd-Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Volume Module: » Count Date: 2 Oct 2008 GG 8:OOam
Base Vol: 200 903 121 202 260 415 453 516 85 69 927 125
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 200 903 121 202 260 415 453 516 85 69 927 125
Added Vol: 3 0 0 8 3 0 2 5 1 0 10 0
ATI: 0 39 15 18 26 32 29 112 0 14 127 16
Initial Fut: 203 942 136 228 289 447 484 633 86 83 1064 141
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 203 942 136 228 289 0 484 633 86 83 1064 141
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 203 942 136 228 289 0 484 633 86 83 1064 141
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 203 942 136 228 289 0 484 633 86 83 1064 141
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.61 0.39 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.64 0.36
Final Sat.: 1750 4893 706 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4944 655
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.19 0.19 0.13 0.08 0.00 0.15 0.11 0.05 0.03 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 25.6 27.3 27.3 18.5 20.1 0.0 21.8 33.2 33.2 19.0 30.5 30.5
Volume/Cap: 0.50 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.42 0.00 0.78 0.37 0.16 0.15 0.78 0.78
Delay/Veh: 37.5 41.4 41.4 56.1 40.2 0.0 47.9 30.3 28.3 38.8 39.2 39.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 37.5 41.4 41.4 56.1 40.2 0.0 47.9 30.3 28.3 38.8 39.2 39.2
LOS by Move: D+ D D E+ D A D C C D+ D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 13 13 10 5 0 10 5 2 1 14 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Do I' ssociates, Inc. Licensed to FEHR & PEERS WALNUT CRK
COMPARE Mon May 02 14:50:37 2011 Page 3-5
Project Name
Project Number
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Background AM
Intersection #3: Wolfe Rd/Vallco Pkwy
S ig nal=ProtecURig hts=lg nore
Final Vol: 0 790 347"'
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 2
� � � � �
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude VoI Cnt Date: 4/12/2011 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol:
Cycle Time (sec): 120
28••• 1 1 173•••
O � Loss Time (sec): 12 � O
0 1 � Critical V/C: 0.540 � 1 2
0 � Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 29.5 � 0
13 1 � Avg Delay (sec/veh): 27.2 � 2 50
LOS: C
� � � � �
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol: 21 1317"' 143
Signal=ProtecURights=lnclude
Street Name: Wolfe Rd Vallco Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Volume Module: » Count Date: 12 Apr 2011 GG 8:OOam
Base Vol: 7 1283 106 196 761 13 1 0 1 16 2 65
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 7 1283 106 196 761 13 1 0 1 16 2 65
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ATI: 14 34 37 151 29 31 27 0 12 34 0 108
Initial Fut: 21 1317 143 347 790 44 28 0 13 50 2 173
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 21 1317 143 347 790 0 28 0 13 50 2 173
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 21 1317 143 347 790 0 28 0 13 50 2 173
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 21 1317 143 347 790 0 28 0 13 50 2 173
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.70 0.30 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5051 548 3150 5700 1750 1750 1900 1750 3150 1900 1750
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.26 0.26 0.11 0.14 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.6 56.1 56.1 23.7 56.1 0.0 7.0 0.0 7.0 25.1 21.3 21.3
Volume/Cap: 0.06 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.30 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.13 0.08 0.01 0.56
Delay/Veh: 39.2 23.3 23.3 44.6 19.8 0.0 55.5 0.0 54.2 38.2 40.7 47.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 39.2 23.3 23.3 44.6 19.8 0.0 55.5 0.0 54.2 38.2 40.7 47.4
LOS by Move: D C C D B- A E+ A D- D+ D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 13 13 7 6 0 1 0 1 1 0 7
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Do I' ssociates, Inc. Licensed to FEHR & PEERS WALNUT CRK
COMPARE Mon May 02 14:50:37 2011 Page 3-6
Project Name
Project Number
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Background+pj qM
Intersection #3: Wolfe Rd/Vallco Pkwy
S ig nal=ProtecURig hts=lg nore
Final Vol: 0 804 347"'
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 2
� � � � �
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=lnclude VoI Cnt Date: 4/12/2011 Rights=lnclude Lanes: Final Vol:
Cycle Time (sec): 120
43••• 1 1 173•••
O � Loss Time (sec): 12 � O
0 1 � Critical V/C: 0.550 � 1 2
0 � Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 29.7 � 0
13 1 � Avg Delay (sec/veh): 27.3 � 2 50
LOS: C
� � � � �
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0
FinalVol: 21 131g"' 143
Signal=ProtecURights=lnclude
Street Name: Wolfe Rd Vallco Pkwy
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Volume Module: » Count Date: 12 Apr 2011 GG 8:OOam
Base Vol: 7 1283 106 196 761 13 1 0 1 16 2 65
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 7 1283 106 196 761 13 1 0 1 16 2 65
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 14 0 15 0 0 0 0 0
ATI: 14 34 37 151 29 31 27 0 12 34 0 108
Initial Fut: 21 1319 143 347 804 44 43 0 13 50 2 173
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 21 1319 143 347 804 0 43 0 13 50 2 173
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 21 1319 143 347 804 0 43 0 13 50 2 173
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 21 1319 143 347 804 0 43 0 13 50 2 173
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.70 0.30 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5052 548 3150 5700 1750 1750 1900 1750 3150 1900 1750
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II---------------I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.26 0.26 0.11 0.14 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.3 56.1 56.1 23.7 56.4 0.0 7.0 0.0 7.0 25.0 21.2 21.2
Volume/Cap: 0.06 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.30 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.13 0.08 0.01 0.56
Delay/Veh: 39.5 23.3 23.3 44.6 19.7 0.0 57.3 0.0 54.2 38.2 40.7 47.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 39.5 23.3 23.3 44.6 19.7 0.0 57.3 0.0 54.2 38.2 40.7 47.4
LOS by Move: D C C D B- A E+ A D- D+ D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 13 13 7 6 0 2 0 1 1 0 7
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Do I' ssociates, Inc. Licensed to FEHR & PEERS WALNUT CRK
137
� � �
0 `'8 N . P,,; m �7 (y � r� N ^ � � T � � N h m ^ �; G ' �n �� �, vi
oc c r� � oc � � -7 oc cv v� v? ot .. m �` r�
Ey N
C1
'a � ,- m . '""' ^
o a t� a �r m v� �� � �, �� r °t a� o o�n cv T�' �o
2 C n� v; m � � �n � a m `° m ^ ^ � n� N m oa oa . � r- � oc
y r �
�
v
d
� � � . G. � m � v ir oc . � � �r r; ,-; r; n :� � oc n n an -3
p; ~' ����. C i� `3 '�' N .. hj �r vi c�5 n ,- ,- °y " n
.`��j JA 7 �n � °b �n
�fl �' h � � N � �
nj „� 1 � C
G
`�C vi °. � n � m �o m ^ r,. �t vi c�7 �. vi m �n � oa r� � r� m �n
C �. �...7 �r c�5 ri � �, v7 .-i � ° O r � �. N h �r 7 -3 . . � r; �, vi
F �_ T
� a -t . � � r; v� oc r; � � � r; oc � G. G. � n ,� r; n 7 �. N
.-i m
z O v-, ca �- oa ca �- ra oti a m ca ,-, ,-, �n c» cv
r
ro
v
a
,� � ',. h � c�7 �o O r � �7 h �n �O N N �"`� �O v; c�7 �C N C1 � oc f^ �
m
Q ', N n� �o � , o� ,-� ,-� �ce , N � ,-� n� . cn
� yJ ^t M N
� N � V1 � �
a M h
^.A M OC � N �Pl � r- P in .-t x �. CC � `y7 � M
C �' � �,, M f", � � '�' M 4 t" � C"' 1`.. �: N� n P `7 ..
R1 � . V7 ,- ^f M ,- � . N hl
„ ,- o � � `"� m
� �
a �
+�
w m
>y a e� '� � -r �
. �
U � � a �.ri . � � � �
a � � � � � �
F
u
a
.�, � N ^ s � J � �
p. � ^ � � � ' � v �; s � : � � � � � -' . �
oi �,�., v ,� � c r � .r cn �� o � ,r'. � :� c c � 'a 5 ° c c c n c � � an
.. , _, � r
� :. � t N vi
;� 'rf � . �. �.. c ... � x m �^ ;= C � ,-. � C C ,G 'c3 r N N e+; =t C r; '�' � -t
,� r1 ,= � N N �.,j C O � � � 7� c�. Ci� .5 oc oc ^t r'� � yJ� �-t
a " tv7 . �n � C1 N Q ' ,-� . . . . . et N
�
�
a �
y �ll �' N. > �� . J
� ti C a r � �, a.�i �, � � N .i 2�i '� .� � N � N � '`� s'�''-i �.
� � v � �-�r �-�r � Y x .��r -��r � x � � x x .��r � v � � ~ .��r x � � �' 3 � � � � � �
C ..^ "�' �'-'. y
G � �G � ^ l ° '9° � � A" � ,J
C/1
9a
�
�.+
Qd
•r C u u G " " G G G
G r � � � � �H � � � � �H � r� � r� � � � r� � �
�
� r
T ��� � -.m 1 _
! J ' �'
V
c � } � f � � �
F �
C `i �{' ' �
/ � q � � Q !� � T�� �
Fu � � �� '�,. � _
ti �r 'T? ., r ,'
S � a v �
N � �; � V r4 � j
r'. ✓: P`1 ,� �^. - ��,, P`1 �
y x � �,J� � cG
�J � :�� ��Li f f�
r��. �� ��� rG ti. '�. �, � � ✓
� ,'' S < < U, r! s x � � f � � �
4 � � `r n
� w� ,., . �� J .; n �
� r ti
138
II
I
� ' � I
I
� � �
f
I
� � � '� � �
I
I
�
� ��
�I
�� ` I
' I
I
i
�
I�
�I
_ I
;; �
� -
;!.
�;
,
r
�
'm w ^ r .
6 �� - ^ � � � ' g � pc + ,
y 1:^ _ �
f'_ - .- . ' ..
��I�= - . �, ��. . .
� �
-_��>�'-- ,.r�GGr�= —
I
I
I
I
� � �
_ _ __-- _ _" _ _ __ — _ I
I
I
��-� i . .. ., ' .
' k�� " ��` � ;� ia;'�"�'� � � P'— � , � �
? � � � �� � � , ' � �
�
� � � �' ,�
�
�'� � ° �
`�+ � � ��� � � � :�.� �;�..
� � � ��:� �
��
�, � � _
� � � � � � ?�- ;��,�,_
� _ � � � �R �'
�� �
� �� �� � �� � ��d'
� �' �'� � � �, ��� -,� � , � �
�',� ���� � ���:�� ��.�'� ��" II�� ,
� � � � � � � � 'I�
�� '� � � � � ��� :., �r '��
� � 3
� � �� � � 3� � ��
.G . '�t 9 , � � '� �} � +� .. .',
� � � � � �
�, ,, s � iw�_,.
.�.�' �
�
� � .� � � � � �
;� � � � —
, .
� �� �3 �� "�°' �:P�, �� , � � �� � _ � ,
3 t � i
. I' � . . _� .. .. � . . . 1 .
�
� 14
-- ?I
� 1 4 ^Y _ . .. � __�s --��'
� ,� 9,s E �� ✓` _..� -�., __. . � _ �
,.��'��" §s �„ 1 �C 1.« � +� �a� ��. r� 'a�' n �� s� �, �� i
.. Y ,�� � ; ,�' ,� ,�,�, ,� � � �
,� �
'r`�
� �' '�"��! � w- -�, — — ���`�� � ���
��� ; s
..; , r �! .
� � �Va�� '� � �� � �.
� �
� �
� `� � �
F t�, � i
I� � i �'� �_ �I � _�
�� � ` , � "` a� ��
�� r��; � ' �it �
^4 -.'a9 - � � p r� �
� t�' ,�"�y ..' Y�- 3 _, ' tl �K �°��,��t ;. -
� 6 Js'
V F �� � ,��, k;�
A' a _
� ��, ��: , ��� �� �
a� ; �� ; { ��' �,� � �
�� �� I �� � �; � ���"' .,, �-
�� � a
�'' 4 �- �
,�. � �� � ;� ��,- y � � L � � �
�_� �,<� a- ��„�. P - �
- :. � �
_r: -
-, _ h °.�,,; ,�.,
� � ����_ �� �;� �� �� �
— ��` � �E� ��'!� �/" �
� {
-��. ���I , �,`��il°V� � ��'�� . � �"
��➢8 kV§ � ° -
_� - '
� � � �� i
� �` "�
�p d � 6�
� y �- �.� ! ��.,�� , �.� �, i.� ,
� gP
I� � --_ �+� �"1[�ra: - �: - _ —
I � �
� '� V
�� �., � . $ � ty _
� � ����ja� � I
4�
j� _
�,?!��.t'•�It%- .� �_ r � +,
�� �� – � � � �
�� { �, �
:,
�
� � ��
i� .:�� .�.0
I
�, ,
+. , . , s
i, � , , _, � �� �
� — � �
a� ° �
��
r�
– � __ --_ _ – -- — – ",
_ �x
� �. � � � � .
.�
� ... � � � "i„� � -- � , ,, _ p , � , �_ �°'� �
�
_ � - � -
A ._� } - " jF �
.. �. � � -' F � ��
� F,
`
g
i f
: �-,
i
� � ,..
� �
� i
j� y
�i �
t .—
I
� i
` � �
�. �_. _- ..� .��'.�` . � ' II
. _ ..�-�-- __._._. .- -�- �= - -_ °� '��,� ' . .
�
A
��^^ _. . "` .... _..._
}
� '
i
_ . _ �. - I . ' �� �
- - - _ �.,.���,�_.--
ti. •
�
r .,- ��l
' �
. � .
i.
■ �
i . .
+ d
' ■ _
� � � 6� � '
� ' �
" _ 6 . - . . � _
� - . . I � F tl� �� '.1 `- � . �, . � I. , _ . , I
I
i
�
�
�
�
�
�
i
- -- - - - - - -- - ��5-.�- ---- - - - -
`�
;�
�_
�
' -�
,
�
r_ _
_,
i � ,� .�-:: ��
� -
�� _ `
� ��.� - _
..
� �;�, �,�� ���
� � - � ,�r � � , - - �
� �����, � • � i - �.
�,.
����� � q����"���:� —� r�. �
,�.���.�� .
-- a��;���:, ���� =r� ��,�� �'��
;� �
��3 s�t'4'.. � ��.' . �o�,..� �k-
�
�
` '
�t wx��
�
�
— — � ���b��
� � �. �_ _ - -� � ��i r , ,
� . w , � �� � •�'�
�� � 9r � a � � � � � ��'���� u
_� � � s � � � �. _ ° m � �
�
�''�" �'�F� i� °! I
�- � ��e'���� �� r.�; � �. �
,
' I � ���� ��, � � _�
�� — _
� �p! � ,� ° . r �;' �
� �� � �� � °
� �,.,
! r � >LBo-�+ 'ww�e
.i i � e � � '� � �
� � � �_ ;
� � � q .� ,a�,. �. .'�° _ . _ ..
e , ."a� •��$� _ J = -' S - - 3.i1
.� i ,� -�� � ,. . .� `- � _-:
` '^�fsur f ''^' -. �w��° "� � .��_ . ' '_.
I ' M
� ;i � .�'�i � - -
y � - _
i . �� . .�K� .,, ..
�i� �. � ��� _ — .".r� E- a� & s s!� . � -� __ � �
; _�h���
I
I�
� �� � � � p � Ci, .
�! ' � , i '. �
. � ' II � � � � � I �� '
a w i
��� ;� ` - - - - - - - ..
_� . � �� I
�
i.
,�, i� -,�
� I � � �
� —
�' , � �__ - '°`.� ' - �
�� �
�� '
� 11�;�� as� i i�.��+a+ �- �` �� " �`" , �..
- --- ��" � �.
, _ _
� �
,,�� ° �. . �. �
� ��� ; � � � �,_
; ..
- _ - _ _. �
, � . _ - — — _- .�F
�A x��`� ,� �'
__ �
i - -�
� "� -� � ��
� �i�,�� , ( y � _—. *. .
..
� � z �
���� �
��— �"r,� - �
�� � _� � "`� �
^ �,,� I � ��
I�;� � � .�,
���'�� ��
�� > . �„ -�.�,�
, y .� � ��.,�N
� ���
i �� — �
— — -— ��,
; �°
�i ��� �.�.__ —
�, — " -- — --
� ��� � ' � � � � � � �
�,
:�.� � �..+����"� ���� � �" �''' a��
y��. �`'�8 ��! '�ffi �!'
� ; � � n; , � - `
� � �
� � � �,� -
� ; ,
, � s , '4 i
_ . ;� _
� ,
� �� �—�, — � � � : — ,
.
, . _,. , . - _ . . c . ..
. �, � �,
�
��
- :�
m -
, -. � -
_ ..
s T . -e ..�.. n °�x . ." - '4ii
-:_. . . � . r . , �
_ . . _ ` ., � , �
� • .
� � _,� v . _ - �� .,�. fP � . . _� _
�� . , a $r ..' .�
�t ' . .. - - • .' , . ' • ' ' . � ' _
_ _
S
6 . � — .. .`` . �. : • P �' -°�
I� � ' �� � ' � `.. _ _ ' o- '
. . ., ; . .. . ��,r -, .. 't'
.
y � � '
, � _ �
...• � •. ' . . - .
� . ' '. .i , ti �. , :
� �
��
Y',
� _
� .,. . . � _ �,; -
' ' _ ,. .
�
.. , _ , ' ., . -•
, - � - "� ,.. . - . • . � � . _ . i - � . �..
� .. .. � -�: . -.. - _ .
a $' a
w _�. -- - - �aa
� - � �.,
li
_ f y ��
_ 9 f3 �I �.
i !.
' .��. _ _ � — - - .. �
' ^ I� � ° � I
5 � ,U
`.R � � _ _
, m .. �
. � �• .
. . . 3. - ; _ :,. ._ . : . ' - : .
4� � �; Y'. - 1
� ti
1 � A �
h e
P -
_ m 6
• - ,. . i✓` �. r � . - . .� _ . • .. . ',. �" . e
- P I x � ..
. � �
.. . " . .J _ ' .- _ -
e
• - n � .' �c . a..'
i.. :, - .t . ' • ' ` i..� �i� i� �.�. - . :.I
�. { .__'.,._ .. i . . . . . . .,.. . - ..
� �.
� -a
. � . . � ., . ". . �R .
'
`
.�a�r _ s ��� r���F�� „ p
.- - -._ 4 . . .. . _
A_ . .. -.. -,._. . _.. _... ..._ "". '°d� ..
. .
.. . , _ � ...- �..
_ .
� . . . - - �v. ._ '. . . . � -. . � �. -�- t ' � - . .. , .. .. ... .
Y
:
� � �i
" 3 �� v _
n r N 2 " _ � � ) . .
A - . ,. ,'� � '
•C a
� y
�. . _ � � . . . t . _. �
i. n �- . -.. � �
�.
' ..ca ' . �' . � � �.� '�iY'!L �n.eer�t'._. i .. _ .
e _ �
��
` 1
s � p
u B
J ' ,� �
' ` 4 � : � � :' . , • �r.
. , : �� 4 L . � °�� { . . . h . . . . �
... '� . .. ._. � �� . �.. .
4 .
.- •- . . o.� ,
� 4 � '� ��. � ' ' . ..
, ... , —. . , ;._' '�
. I .,... � � � . � _ ' i . . -��
- � � ? u i � � . _ a ' . . . . -
] ' '
. � a ' n
� . , _ . '.� F ��� .
. � • ..._ � _ . �� _
�_ . � 1 r
R 3 ' � ..- . [`— � _ _ _ _ _ — _ _
.. .• r � � ��:i _ ,
� >
u�
- , � . A . . . . . . _ . . . .
; r 6 . ' � . �., t , ,.: : ' ... . . . . . .
_ . .. , �_ .s.� .. ____ v .... . .__ .. yy �
�� .. . _ � . . 3�Si.5i�S..dG4� ---- " �� E _ a3�i�nsc�YeM
� . 4K'�-� M � 1.. � . .exe , . . .'___ '
�h� dm,
.. .,.. .� +. '
,Y1 i' ]. . _ . s a . ' _
r :.. �a- .. ; : �� ,
:rh�� . . - r �.�,�:�, ,r{ ...�r,. .: � s-�'�ri4F.��.S� �: . -��g�� � .' �� i r: � . , r . � { � . _ . � . . � F
�?�&��ifsavau. ' °s�:�u s.,= e�� c$.�a7a;;a�k.lIIU x..,a :r�.=a. .��,..� . .....y , a . , �o so_ .: r � �� yR � �,. �,d. . i �' .. r'�v �� ia r��f a �. ?ti�;.� � e .
� � �� '� �� �� � 0.
�'- �- � � -�<-: __ _ — ��-- _ �..
_ .�; ._-. ._.�..�±. .._svrc_� _ __ � �!+�a.c,,t7 — —� — — -- �
. ._ _ . ..___. . ___���,
� ��
� �'
� - �
: .. - , :l1 4 ` 1� — '. i
__
��,�, _ � ��� � _ __
��' � t ,
- _ � ,� _
__ ,
- - — ----
� � -- _ I ;�,
������� f�i ��I �
�— �� �il � -
�-- � , i` _
� j . �
� w � � I
; � U. , „ ;
--
�.� -;� �,
���
�
�;�.� � �� ` I
- . °��� — �
��''�� �� �,�,��`� ,���1�"� — —— — (
. _, .
�, , ..
� _� ��� _
�` �� � � f � �� , �
,
�
,��,�' �; � � � � �- �' ����.�;. �
—� — —,� — � -�� —
�... -- —
� , � I
F �� �I
; � ��.� � — � �f — ; �
��, u � � � �R�
�„ � � �
��i i � o�: — �__, � _
'��� � ��,� � �
ax F .�
,� z ��� f� � � '
�■ � r�� � :s° �,�.
�
����@ �' :_ '�'" - -
_
����, i
�����d� ��� � ��" ; r ' �,
�'����� `�! ,. � ,�� A � �
_� �,� � _� _ . � _
, _
�� ��
u -�
� �
��-�`� r�-� _ �I : - - - -
,,
�� ; � .
_ - -
�,. � �� �
� ��';
;u� -- - � �
_ ,
��.� � � ;.
� � _ � -�., � � , �
�:: e m��� � �> Rd� i __
�o -
� .
� � ��i'� e•a� m'sa� �s � � o ��., �i:� ��.�� � � �� � i ` I �
� `n !'� ''4 ,. LaR � , u'3 - m_` —__,. _._ ��LL�" . � ; .I ` . ..
� '��vb�. �o$t 1 � �.6. .�u i "A .. �_. _ _ . _ . � � _ . , -
__ — _ —_ _ __ — _ II d — _ _ - -_
� � � � �
..,z- �..� . _. ' ....,..< �<.� _ . . _ — _
..�m � �� —.— _ -_,�,. .�-- .._ ..�..�.. _�,..-a.a -- — _ — __
f _..��"' . � ���' F•�d - � ._�—� ._. .
f'.�� i ����'�a° �r� �� ���_ � I
�
� ., � � �, — — — — - —
�, � ��r ;, � a —
p , __— _ .A— � ;.
e �' —___ _. i � .w:
�. ° �� fa . �� . -.._- �� � '., �r��� �, i'�.� �
?y , � � � I � i �' � S 1 �i
h .�. t (
i
���� A '4� 1e ��! i I i _ -' �-_H �, I,
. ,=__ _. ... _. , � ..— ._.. ... - I .— .'__ ' _ _
�- ~-_-' � �� �
�� i I a.�'N I I�
i � ' a.:
�' p
�� — I �'y
_ � � -=f i - � ,
_ �
.a
�i
i
w� � � - ' - - - - - - - -- I I!
� a�� � - i � I �� + .
� ''� s � z � �
w�
a � a a � � � �, I
I� �° — - - =�i _ i -
�
gt, � �n , � � � � ��r� I �e ;i �I31 s'_ I �
ir _ �
,�- �, ��_ � �._n a"f - =- - —�= _
, �. � 'a� .��� _ � � �
— _ ,
� : � �- �a _ _ - � �� _ �e. .�� . . - —, � � � _ _-�_._. � - -
- �.�'4� -- — y - - — - - —
� � —
�1 � 3 " i � i - — i
r `�" ia — �
�;
�r
�. `� � � � . �. � a+ � � � �a ' � �
_-. � � e �� '�t�_ � �
_ -
����C�� ___- - '--_ - _ !�'� _ __ __
���� ���„
_ .� - -- _
" � � ,�' ���,��,����� i ° _ __- = -� �
� ���b�5#�—,� ---
�a� �� --
� � � �����'' � � �� i ���'�
�
_ i �� _ �-
��� `i ����� �°�`�
t�� ,;
_ k ��. � � _ ;
� � „, � ��
� 4 �°�
� � ��t ��� � 4 '" � � 2 ��.
�� ��[���t���s A.. ��� ����ir� ��� - ;'�.� � —
- _ ° — .r,�+� � . . �� _ _
� t� -a z��t �� ���' � � �!. � ���.�
��� ���� �n��
� � , , '-�i,� a��:;�� ,�-� `�'
- �" � ��,� a� � y�
� F_:] � �����"� ���p � II■
���` �'��� S
rt - ��
i �-�
�� �� !� ��; ,h?I �
E� � � _ i
¢-'_ �4 "' I � 9° � � A �R 1 --
1
��:�,: � ��'� I �
� "A e�._4� � � ��! �>,� �� q1 �y .� -
. F ,,,, ..: ,
� -— i q
,
�,� �
� � � ��,. • -r �.
— ,� o � I
m —
� �� _
y _ . (�lY�Y� .
,
, a � ,- ' +,� -
�ExB —
�, � — - _
���
� ��; �,� °' � -
5 . -�_R� �'-' _ N Fiiim�nia�'tl^"'� .
' _ _ ' _. ' . — _ �
_ _-- _ _— _ — R �
@€ s
� �
A�. - - €I' - � �
�`� ���
��
&,� -
���
��t �s' ' - � .
_ � � � ¢ � ;. �°. ` ��.
� ��I — -- — _ _ _- _
�
� Aliil��ll7�� — _
i
; I
�. ': �
� R�Y I..FdI� R`°I�i�'�� �
I I.. ,� �IS Nln� J;�III � .
I� ` �
_ _ ��' �
— �II
_ __-.�_>s"�' . — _
� _ I ' ' __
�'�. — _ _
_} ��a � — _ _ -
—
� �I
_ _. .. . .. ..
,. .--_ .. _ _ _ _ _ _ .,
_ _ . - . _ ....____ _ _
� �" � � ' � � � �` � *
,
�,;._. � '� ��� r�� ��'��� I _ � �' �' �� �
- -- ,{ � .
.� _ , ,_: _ _-- ,- - -
� - - - - - ,--- r.__� - -
� _ __, _ _
� _
- _ -
' � _.
, � � �
� , ,. � � ��)
--- - ',_
� �I���- � �
����� ..
, �....�-�: _ _ - --
�u �
,
_-
� __
- - n
�
' i
u
� - - �, . _ ., .
i
� ��� I ^.� ►� �:� � '!��'� #�: I �
_. . _. ���
�. � ��-. ��.
. _____ . . _.. ..
- _ _ _.._ .-._ _... ...
.I .
II
� -
- 5
� � � �i � � � . � �'
� '
,. . „ . . ,- . _ . _
�'� � 1 i i 9I. ' �� f �� .
� �
, ,-
�� �� �� ` _,
� � �.-' . , � �r � �
���, � � s
�. �� ��iHF� � � , a�
�d," _ � �- '�`�� �1 4� I
�� � � �' °;
��� � � �,�� � ��� ��
� `�` �`��' '�� �` '#�
�� �
�" �
__ __ _ — �,����`_ _ _ _ _ P= -
� _�° � � —
��
��� � ��:- ���,f��
�'''�' s'�If_u R����N��� �
� - _ - ����r�rrr�9_g-� � r a �° �t t �
� -�� « 4� eA � _� .� r: ��- �
�� �� -
- ���� ;�i� �
�"'� =_�����
� ��.
9I ,� - �y' � a� �.�� � �
-
� � i �� .�� ��= °� 5 ' I '
, i
T� i � � __
f _ �6Y 6 �� �.
� yy �
( �� 9 �
.�N � � ��u . z
� " ��'�� s:w
�
��� ���. � -
. �:
���� — ;��
�.
� �
�a � �, �,��� ,�
.� �
— -— _— ��
�� �T - -
�
�
�
,
'� _ �� �
-
-
�
' � , �. �
� _ ���: ; � �
�
_ fIE � .� _ P��, � — —
. -- — — - I
__ i I _�— _P�_
� � ���
— _ ,�� �� —
$�� _� � : .,�. ,
�� �� —
� �, .
,
_ _ o �. �.�
-- :���
�
,_.�
;�� �� �
�s = _
4.. i
' �MM- p.. �. •.• .
� I� � , �",Y" `� �.
��� � � _
�r'YT4"' •
, .. f �,... ��;�
- _ _-__' _ '__ _ _ ". ' �. - - _ _ _ —
_ /�d � 11lS !1lls�lb ' �"- ` ` .,:
� �� 1 I i I � 1 9�! T( i I r e � ;,;. �"
IC11 I ' 3 1 'i€ ] f M1 Z ' �� F'P
i i�ri� c t" � � � ''r�'t�n ' �' ' ' �
rr i.i..i � d�i�ipn � irn �' �i i . u i i r � i�� `
- -� � ir � i t ° r =,. n u � =1 . �- ' !�°`_, i�„°, '"'"*- '
vi:L � 1�=��,3 L� il-fi�i sii
i
�� �' �
__ 'i iA �i "' .
-t� �
- � ?-� - �, � r _ � ;t��� t-� a`'s-s ,�:�
�'
�
i:
� �
� � ��' - r � — - �
^�e°� .,� . _ {
� � � �` �
� �_.
�. ., —
� ,, - _
, : ,
; � . � � � � ,, ,- . � � � � �� � � ���
�
� ��
, ��`
,
_ ; ,
„ ,,
, �- _.
.. _ . r
_ � �
- .� i
�
ji �
. _ _ _ _ ._ ; � �
t � � I ' _ ' . -� .
1 � D
F hti�_ . `" _ I� . . �p � �
-.. _ _ _ .. � "
,. _ _ _.,- ; _ i . -
_ ... ___ . _.
._.:_ _ __ . . . ,
�, :;
- __ _-_��= �a�.s!�..�es*e. ._
I
� . � � � � .'.�
.-. � i ._i i , . � � � I . II -� , � ; i . i 'i
-_ ' —_ '___ __ _ _ -' - e - _ - . � -
,t �
_ _ '__ _ _' _ - . ._ . ..
�
� _ � � __'
� 1 _ �,
, y ; _ ,
�� . ,.ti ! ; ,_ � � � - .
���� ;- .
���
��� _
_� :
---. .
. E'
�, � s
- -- -- — — - °- I
I �.
. _ . . .� �� `. :�. � _ . I � �
- —
� ''. I : ��,� :��il li�.. ,... _. :,.
��'�����, . . �. . I °! wR �
_ _ _ . . . ... . . _ .
�� :'r �
_
4
- -- - _ _ � - . ---
_ . . . _ .. . _ — -"- �� I
� �
t� i
s -
l
, _ , . . � . . - ._ _
_ ' � ' "- 9 � ` °' - i �. i '� � i
i _ � . . ._ .. . . . _ . .
i
�
�
T�u �,�r.e sc._ ,f� ,�e.z I
s�- .� m,� . -
w ,�
�w 5�"a,� �"�° � - �` `�.,' ^�
— � �s
�r - �
�` -
� ,. -
- c
�� ;�
�„` ,-
� yy ,
�� �
- �
� �
.,.-6 �� .� � � ��YI.� � .
� ��ii�'fE ''—n- �.
.� �°v ' � ' � �i�IR I�I11Qi'!Jii�� �� --
� ��� �
� ' , � �°�� � —
- � ar�,���� � �� .
� � `> — � a!r� r� � � ,.�_��,��
�
: -' '� � � �,��irrr� � �rr
._•.. '., i ' ., . ��,dii . � _ _ ..
_ r �� �YdiY�� � `�l�i� � �
s. .. .
���.. . : ' �� � '���� �� �i��s,
� . " a� �� _.. _ � ���
��� � - ' � J � ��� �� �
. �� '!"�
_ n= . ° � ��
M�� � �
�� � . � ��� ��� �
� - ,
_
� � _" — �,. � " I
s � -
� � � __
� _ � �� _��x �� _ � ; �,�
� t��"���� � � � t�i' � e
�
� � � �'W � � �. �:� E �PP! � ,�
� � �����:d���
�_ ���'
" �
� ... ..�� f:"' �
4` • - s.= ...r.v
� ��,• �•
.: °?' „ —� • �
�-,� ������� � ������ ,���� � � ��
�
i
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY HALL
1�3�0 T�RZLB AVEN�IJE � CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
(408) 777-33(�8 � FAX {�C18) 777-3333 • �lanning@cu�ertino.or�
Subject: Report of the Community Development Director
Planning Commission Agenda Date: Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Miscellaneous Items:
1. Communi e Energ Champions Grants - The City received notice that it will be awarded
two Community Energy Champions Grants (totaling $30,000) to expand its GreenBiz
Pilot Program and establish a new "Growing Green Blocks" initiative to engage
interested city neighborhoods in environmental services offered by the City. This item
will come before the City Council in early June.
2. Cupertino Da� - The 2011 Cupertino Day, held on May 7, 2011, was a success at
Blackberry Farm. Approximately 500 residents had fun and enjoyed the barbecue, the
pool and the nature activities. McClellan Ranch Park wildflower garden was is in full-
bloom.
3. New Fire Chief - The County has appointed Chief Kenneth Kehmna as the new Fire
Chief. Attached is the press release.
Upcoming Dates:
June 1 CREST Awards Ceremony, Community Hall, 7 to 9 p.m.
Enclosures:
Press Release
News Articles
G: � Planning � AartiS � Director's Report � pd5-24-11. doc
153
�
I
� �
I
_ County of San�a Claxa ��u�T,�
�' ,�w ��, � �i o
�� Office of fihe Couniy Executive �� ��
� 70 West Hedding Street, East Wing 11th Flaor t� `'
� - San Juse, CA 95110 � ,Aw
� ^.. Q ,.`C'
(408) 299•5119 �'rA ��� �
www.sccgov.org
'
FOR IMM�DYAT� R�LEAS�
May li, 2011 �
�
Contact: Gwendolyn MiCchell/Laurel Anderson �
Office crf Public Affairs �
_ (408) 299-5119 �
�.
County of Santa Clara Appoints New Fire Chief ;
Chief Kenneth Kehmna erings 23 years of Fire Service Experience �
� SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALI�.— Today, the County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors
announced the appointment of Kenneth R. Kehmna to serve as the new Fire Chief for the Santa �
Clara County Fire Department. Kehmna, wha has Z3 years oP flre serv(ce experience, began his �
career as a ffrefighter with the City of Campbell in 1987. In 1993, County Fire assumed �
responsibllity for providing fire services to Campbell, bringing Kehmna and his colleagues from the �
� city into the Santa Clara County Fire Department. �
i
i
Since 2007, Kehmna held the post of Deputy Chief, tirst in charge of operations and In 2009 in �
i charge of training. As Deputy ChEef of operations, he managed the four departmen� battalions and
the flre fnvestigatian division. As Depu�y Chlef in �harge af training, he manages all training
activitles to ensure fireFighter readiness. From 2005 to 2007, Kehmna was BatitaHan Chlef. From
August 2004 to May 2005, he served as Training Captain and Fire CapCain fram February 2000 to
August 2004,
�
"Chfef Kehmna brings a wealth of experience and knowledge to the positlon of Fire Chlef," safd County ;
of Santa Clara Board Pres(dent Dave Cortese. "He fs intfmately familfar with fire service in Santa Glara j
i
Countiy and dedicated to providing high-level quafity servlces to our community." '
�
. i I
The Santa Clara County Fire Department is a CaliFornia FEre Protection District serving Santa Clara �
i
County artd the cammunities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Mon�e �
i
Sereno, Morgan Mi11 and Saratoga. County Fire functians as a regional emergency services delivery i
system, partnertng with other Iocal jurisdictions ta pravide a high level of servlce and to supplement
the services of smalle� communftles. (
�
: ( I
-more- � I
a I
154
. CounYy of Santa Clawa Appoints New Fire Chief — page 2
• Kehmna values bullding and malntalning strong cooperative relationships with reg{onal pu61[c safety
�
parCners and working closely with local governments in the county. Kehmna contlnues to serve an �
the Stake Training and Education Advisory Committee provlding policy review for the State Fire S I
Marshal and final review af all State Fire Training course curricula. Kehmna also serves on fihe
FIRESCOPE CICGS Task Force assis�ing w{th continuous dev�lopment of the California lncident
Command Certification System (CICCS}.
Throughout his management career, he has provided leadershlp by coaching and mentoring others.
He also worked closely with the recently retired Fire Chief and represented County Fire at the
reglonal and statewlde level working closely with the California Emergency Management Association
and Cal Fire.
Kehmna completed his Master of Science degree in Executive Fire Servlce Leadership from Grand
Canyon Universlty In 2009, He graduated wlth honors and recelved a Bachelor oi Arts degree ln
Management from Saint Mary`s College in 1999. He also has an Assoclate of Sclence degree in Ffre
Science fram Mission College. � '
. � '
�
"I wlll do my very best to preserve the proud ifneage o� leadership that has been the hallrrmark of �'
this DeparCment," he continued. "I am excfted about our future and canfldenC Chat the outstanding �
relatfanship we have with fabor wiil continue as we face new challenges and opportunitles together
in the comfng years."
His appointment as Fire Chief is effective May 16, 2D11, and he will be paid $214,687. Kehmna and
his wlfe Ginger reside in San Jose and have two chfldren - 7.5 year old son John and 14 year old
daughter Hannah.
###
�i
i
i
�.
- � M
� � ca , ::
, ,�,� , .
;`� � �
J�
,'` t` .
�� .
r -'.., _ �
� �' S. `.s�i�
� , �
�. :i. s
�
�-- +�_, � ` V
1
�
155 �
�� ���� f'
: � ;
; Yellow Light for Green Building �rdinance
1 Concerned about added cost to residents and builders, Cupertino City Council votes 3-2 to bring the ordinance back for
consideration in a year.
By Pam Marino � Email the author � May 6, 2011 .
Cupertino's Green Buildinq Ordinance got a yellow "slow down" light instead of a green light from a majority
of the City Council on Tuesday night, delaying any action by one year.
Mayor Gilbert Wong, Vice Mayor Mark Santoro and Councilwoman Kris Wang said they wanted to slow
down the path to stricter green building rules to give the city time to educate the public and, perhaps, give
the economy time to get a little better before imposing new fees on residents and builders.
Councilmen Barry Chang and Orrin Mahoney disagreed, saying the ordinance has been under discussion
by the Planning Commission and council for more than a year already.
"By not taking action tonight, that's a mistake," said Chang. "A year from now, we may take no action ... we
were elected to take action."
The ordinance is now scheduled to go back to the council in May 2012 for reconsideration. Had it approved
the ordinance on Tuesday, it would have gone into effect Jan. 1, 2012.
Santoro reminded the council that builders are already forced to comply with the state's Cal Green laws,
which went into effect Jan. 1. The new code requires builders to use "green" materials and building
methods, and promote energy, water and resource efficiency.
Cupertino's proposed Green Building Ordinance would have gone beyond the Cal Green requirements,
however, imposing even stricter standards on builders.
i
"Why do you feel compelled to add on additional cost to the industry again and again and again?" asked
Myron Crawford of the building firm, Berg and Berg. "Stick with the California green building codes, let it do
its job; IeYs see how it works out within industry. Other cities have said, no, we're not going to impose
more."
A main sticking point was the increased fees and deposits. Fees could increase 1-2.2 percent, depending
on the type of project, which could mean thousands for individual single-family homes and up to hundreds
of thousands for commercial developments.
A consultant for the city hired to help craft the ordinance said that while green building can cost more, over
the long term the costs are balanced by increased savings in energy and water usage, as well as providing
environmental benefits to the community and planet.
The new required deposits would ensure adherence to green building standards. Builders would have to
show verification perFormed by certified consultants, in order to get the deposits back.
There are two types of verification—formal and informal. Formal verification would require seeking an
official LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) or GPR (Green Point Rated) certification.
Informal verification would require a consultant to verify that a project meets certain green building
standards.
For example, a single-family home project seeking formal verification would require a$2-per-square-foot '
deposit, up to $1,000. Informal verification would require a$500 deposit; that money would be returned
once verification is made.
156 '
_ _ _ z _. I
For commercial projects, it would cost a developer a minimum of $35,000 and maximum of $75,000 for a
formal verification deposit. The deposit for informal verification would be $1,500.
The plan before the City Council on Tuesday had already been scaled back from when the ordinance was
considered in Februarv. Originally the plan called for builders to acquire 85 points on the LEED or GPR
j rating scales, reflecting the number of green building products and practices they were using. Three local
cities—Palo Alto, Sunnyvale and Morgan Hill—require 70 points; Cal Green requires 50, which is what the
council said it would suppart.
The deposits for verification amounts were alsa adjusted downward. In the case of single-family homes, the
verification amount was cut in half from $2,000 to $1,000.
"I think we've come to a good middle ground here," Orrin Mahoney said of the scaled-back version.
It was still too much for the council majority, however. They stated they support green building standards
but wanted more time for the public to get used to them.
"I think we're all a little bit concerned about what it will cost our residents if we just drop this bomb on them,"
Santoro said.
Wang added, "Don't label that we don't suppart this ... I want to make sure that we're going toward the
green building, but iYs in a slow and steady way. We don't want to increase any living cost for anybody, and
that's the whole reason."
Chang added a parting shot before the vote, "But Council member Wang, actions are speaking louder than
words."
I
. ,
157
Format Dynamics :: C1eanPrint :: http://www.mercurynews.com/cupertino/ci_18053763?... Page 1 of 2
t�C�e,�1��C�l�Ct,� �eW�
MercuryNews.com
Cupertino City Council Week's public hearing voiced support for the
amended ordinance. One speaker expressed a
VOteS t0 Ut a St0 t0 desire to adopt a prohibition on chewing tobacco to
p P keep the habit out of the minds of little ones.
smokin in recreational
g "In parks you have all ages of children and teens,
aY•ea5 and the younger children are always looking to the
:� cool teens to see what they are doing," said Janet
Ghanem, a representative of Breathe California. "If
they are chewing tobacco and spitting it out, you
By Matt Wilson know the 6, 7 and 8-year-olds are going to say,
mwilson@community-newspapers.com 'Wow that's cool. Maybe I'll do that.' I don't think that
is the message you want to give them."
Posted: 05/12l2011 08:00:57 PM PDT
Updated: 05/12l2011 08:00:57 PM PDT John Zwaanstra, a 30-year Cupertino resident and
retired physician urged the council to adopt the
Want to light up in a Cupertino park? Think again. ordinance based on his history of dealing with the
The Cupertino City Council unanimously amended a aftereffects of patients who smoked throughout their
city ordinance on May 3 that now prohibits smoking lives.
- in recreational areas such as city parks. "In the park, you're not worried about the long-term
The ordinance states that recreational areas include consequences, but children from secondhand
streets and sidewalks adjacent to recreational areas smoke can be triggered to have an asthma attack," h
owned and operated by the city. Places where e said. "Plus anything we can do to keep people
puffing is now prohibited include parks, picnic from smoking is potentially beneficial for them, even
areas, playgrounds, sports fields, golf courses, though they don t always agree with this."
walking paths, gardens, hiking trails, bike paths, San Jose, Milpitas, Saratoga, Sunnyvale and
horseback riding trails, swimming pools, and roller
skating and skateboard parks. Blackberry Farm is unincorporated parts of the county have adopted
already a non-smoking environment, according to ordinances restricting smoking in recreational
� city staff. areas, according to Mark Linder, Cupertino s
director of parks and recreation. City staff added
According to the ordinance, smoking includes a that Campbell and Los Gatos are also considering
li hted i e li hted hookah ci ars and ci arettes. bans on smoking in recreational areas.
9 PP � 9 , 9 9
State law already prohibits smoking within 25 feet of The Cupertino ordinance is also an attempt to cut
_ playgrounds and tot lots, and the law also
�: authorizes local communities to enact additional - �� �E�'�'� ���
restrictions. The state law applies only to parks
designed specifically for use by children and does
not apply to smokeless tobacco products. The law ���� �'� ���� ���
also prohibits smoking within 20 feet of public i��,�E,�+�e�,� '
buildings. L� �� ! y, ���� �� ,����.
City staff proposed an amended ordinance that
would have also prohibited other smokeless
tobacco products, such as chewing tobacco.
However, the proposal was not adopted, as some ������ ����� �
council members believed that the city should only "
prohibit tobacco products that could adversely
affect others around them.
Speakers at last
�� -
Print Pawere� By ��Forma�l�ynamics'�
�
http://www.mercurynews.com/fdcp?unique=1305763�1��289 5/18/2011
, Format Dynamics :: C1eanPrint :: http://www.mercurynews.com/cupertino/ci_18053763?... Page 2 of 2
t�C�e,��CCUC,� �eW�
MercuryNews.com
down on cigarette-related litter in recreational
areas, according to a city staff report.
On Jan. 10 the city entered into an agreement with
, the county of Santa Clara for the purpose of
preventing tobacco use. The agreement made the
city eligible to receive $23,387 in grant funds from
the Centers for Disease Control. The city's amended
ordinance allows the grant to help the city
� implement signs and educational material for the
anti-smoking policy in recreation areas.
Secondhand smoke recently became a target of Santa
Clara County once again. On April 26, the Santa
Clara County Public Health Department unveiled a
_ new ad campaign to draw attention to the dangers of
secondhand smoke. The campaign features a •
tele�ision commercial airing in English, Spanish and
Vietnamese that graphically depicts the impact of
secondhand smoke on children.
The commercial will air through July, full-page print
° ads will be featured in Santa Clara County
newspapers and outreach materials will be
distributed at community events.
Survey
i The Santa Clara County Public Health Department is
� also doing a survey on the opinions and health
i practices of county residents regarding their
behaviors and beliefs about cigarette smoking and
tobacco use. Residents can take the survey by
visiting the city of Cupertino's website, www.
cupertino.org.
For more information on the county's INSPIRE
Tobacco Prevention campaign, visit www.
yousmoketheysmoke.org.
'�+�I� �Q1iN`� '�-+$�'�-���-�$���
�cu���r
��� � �
-� '�_CUrrmr.� Yrs��tP� rn��}r,3�-k�r�hh4�riF;iM:�!'�trc�l�r�Vi�i 71.4Ia4s��a2r�1 If1, PS 64
Fd1fR:P�},�1"f+Edt T1J� Ck �1 tYt{�[ a7iA ��� er:liil4i! {1311�y2 �A j64� {t&P�it� d53�i!$S.i�Y:IN'!1. �16tM t(�1t51:
I��segtisurl Lw�le���dlfm�':rau�FtrJ,Si1�[�ilairCYe�ill�sqthm+l�i�+rl.tr•i�4�re34kkahf
-� tp�y.ck1'dS�WJ �rrtwSevi:np�4dv--lnAfJTl�u'Jr.iib!A�n[�s5atimscwhbr4iK�larP'+�du�lrcin�f
Srwdl ierrita�;n:.01h��atrpl�usaeai�t�c��rmlFecur�xdrk5:m'ultnaNkr. •'Sal€�4"dA`SJN{.nII
IltTs: �t�i�'IFl�UR{��a6�o�l.iitrp;smlgC§skraad�mt��sxedh,��LlSxur¢�ISerA�s.Poeqai�r
� m�•� �ncp�n.ia'il 1�E?d�d�l?.l33�� -urp.eRralAclhnsar�.�a�aW �rrqcixwe€Fs.
Rrint Powered By �'� �c�rmatC3yn�mies" �
http://www.mercurynews.com/fdcp?unique=1305763h�289 5/18/2411
Format Dynamics :: C1eanPrint :: http://www.mercurynews.com/cupertino/ci_18053764 Page 1 of 2
���,��CCtICt� ��W�
MercuryNews,com
CU ertino ado tS lan to The adoption of the plan is also a requirement for
P P p the city to be eligible for outside funding from the
make it a more bic Cle— Transportation Development Act administered
y through the Metropolitan Transportation
friendly city Commission and Bicycle Transportation Account
money administered through Caltrans.
- City staff said that the city has seen an increase in
By Matt Wilson bicycle usage and interest in alternative
mwilson@community-newspapers.com transportation as a way to reduce traffic congestion
and help the environment. Bicycling remains a
Posted: 05/12l2011 08:01:01 PM PDT popular issue and priority in Cupertino. The city
1 The city of Cupertino has a long-range plan for how completed the Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge on
April 30, 2009, and is working to complete a trail
� to better integrate bicycling around town. The city through Blackberry Farm from McClellan Road to
� council at its latest meeting unanimously adopted Stevens Creek Boulevard.
an updated Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan
that focuses on creating bikeways and promoting Stillman told the council that the city received
. bicycling in the city. Bicycle Friendly Community status from the League
of American Bicyclists. The city earned the award at
The long-range planning document is designed to the bronze level, which is presented only to
encourage bicycling as a safe, practical and healthy communities with strong commitments to bicycling,
alternative to the motor vehicle, according to a city according to city staff. Sunnyvale, Mountain View
staff report. The city council adopted the current and Santa Clara have also achieved the honor.
plan in December 1998 and the document has been
getting an update the past two years by city staff and The city also participated in the 17th annual Bike to
the Cupertino Bicycle Pedestrian Commission. Work Day on May 12. The Cupertino Bicycle
Pedestrian Commission worked with the Silicon
"It's a document that has been a lot of work [and] a Valley Bicycle Coalition to get commuters and
lot of time for a lot of people, and we are very proud students to leave their cars at home and bike to
of it and happy to bring it forward," said Timm work or school. The city set up morning "energizer
Borden, director of public works. stations" in front of the Quinlan Community Center
to serve hot coffee and coffee cake to passing
The bulk of the plan focuses on each of the 17 cyclists.
proposed bikeways throughout the city.
The 2010 event saw 140 cyclists pedaling north and
"It is essentially a bike route that has been taken one
step further to be bike-friendly to encourage
bicycling," said David Stillman, senior ci�il �I� �'Ei.�T� �;rt��i
� engineer. "For example, it can be by removing
impediments to 6ike travel such as stop signs and it ���� �� ���� ��
can be taken further to make �ehicle travel difficult." �
Proposed improvements on bikeways range from � 11�(��'� �� �C11���� !�
small, low-cost items such as installing bike route -
signs to large-scale projects such as adding a
grade-separated railroad crossing. The updated
plan is divided into five main chapters focusing on „ �
the environment, engineering needed for bicycle ����� ������ � I
routes, how to encourage bicycling in the city,
_ educating the community about bicycle safety and
enforcing rules associated with bicycling.
PrNnt Powered By (� ��orr�natDynamic�"
http://www.mercurynews.com/fdcp?unique=1305763�$4647 5/18/2011
_ _ _ _ 3
_ Format Dynamics :: CleanPrint :: http://www.mercurynews.com/cupertino/c%18053764 Page 2 of 2
�; �e,��CCUI',� ��lU�
� MercuryNews.com
-, 96 traveling south on N. Stelling Road past the
energizer station for a total of 236 passers-by.
Nearly 100 cyclists stopped for coffee, cake and a
' chat about their commute.
The city said that the event saw a 9 percent increase
over the 2009 Bike to Work Day. Results from the
2011 event were not available as of the Courier's
deadline.
For more information about Bike to Work Day, visit
www.bikesiliconvalley.org/btwd.
:�
i
I
� � iUlVl1� �� �
- �" :
� �;�
w� �
�� �,:,.,
_ � �-�
, �
��� �
� � � ���� F ,
�L7 � , _-
��lSr ��!# .
_ � �'1�� �if� �ne��a� co��; �s�nnr�
�
��
I
Print Powered By �� F�rm��tDyn�mics'°
_
,
http://www.mercurynews.com/fdcp?unique=13057631��647 5/18/2011
Page 1 of 1
(��e,�eCCUC,� �e1U�
j MercuryNews.com
CU ertino ado tS reen "what we are suggesting is something above and
p p g beyond," Mayor Gilbert Wong said at the May 3
- building standards meeting.
Councilmen Barry Chang and Orrin Mahoney cast
the dissenting votes, saying they want the ordinance
By Matt wilson to take effect much sooner.
mwilson@community
"I think the green building ordinance has been
Posted: 05/12l2011 08:02:21 PM PDT going for a long time already even before I ran for
city council the planning commission was
Greener building requirements are coming to discussing it back and forth," Chang said. "By not
Cupertino in a year. After more than a year of taking action tonight, I think that is a mistake."
discussion, the Cupertino City Council at its latest
meeting voted 3-2 to adopt a green building The council will make a final vote on adoption
ordinance 12 months from now. during a public hearing in 12 months. Further study
of the issue could be done by the city staff and at
The proposed green building ordinance is intended the commission level over the course of the next
to guide the design, construction, retrofit, operation year.
and demolition of new and existing commercial and
residential buildings. For more information about green initiatives in
Cupertino, �isit www.cupertino.org/green.
The rules will not take effect for another 12 months
_ as the council wants to give the public more time to
• digest the changes. In the meantime, the council
plans to educate residents, builders and the
business community on how the ordinance could
� affect them.
� "We're going to spend 12 months educating,"
Councilwoman Kris Wang said. "I want to make sure
that we are going towards green building in a slow
and steady way. We are not harsh and we do not
- want to increase any living costs for anyone. That is
-1 the reason."
�' Since late 2009, Cupertino city staff has been
working with the community to craft the ordinance,
using a set of policy recommendations by the Santa
Clara County Cities Association's Green Building
Collaborative as a starting point.
.
; The requirements aim to be in line with the new
state green building code called CALGreen, which
currently sets the threshold of building codes at a
_
. higher level by requiring development projects to �,��� �,�'�M �����—��,�-�"�'��
incorporate green building practices. CALGreen, a
statewide mandate that took effect on Jan. 1, will �,��q��
�H�1� '� �
require all new residential projects of three floors or
fewer and all non-residential projects to comply au�,:ncWrr,��n;�,u��.�rr��4,�s-w��,mr��w�r�����„�z�����«��,��:s;.��,�.«r,ais��s�n
with the code. The standards are the de facto rules ��� F���r�,�,������.��a�r�a�a,�,arr���t�+krr�e,�v,,�«dn�l��� ���r sau:�i,x�a��o�i�s��
IYr�KSEtaelied Ls��I,asn�iLt�r.1�1P4eie��i�.SlIB�dli�tir:i6f�s5ai�fr4�rad.6e
� in Cupertino until the city adopts its ordinance next t�i-��r���'�����n
m�itl _ntim,nt.OtFer•�Ie�Ias�ul�GrCorrol�.6e�nrthnedrY:i2rnal�ernPer. "j��tl£�."'Ci(tCr2
year. r���•: � '�.YtyI,�IRtai�hpnrdsltr�3eserll����ckrav�cmhpmur!dhl�+T�_*.PSmi�.Flqaf+es
� mxl.�rr:er[pkm.Cdll-l�d.4l� :i3¢kravr{1�t+kmMrlkvsyrarrden,#hp�tlr.AtdS. .
Print Pow�red By �I��F�rm��tC]yn�mics�
http://www.mercurynews.com/fdcp?unique=1305763$��270 5/18/2011