The URL can be used to link to this page

CC 10-21-02 AGENDA CUPER'I6INO CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR ADJOURNED'MEETING CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ REGULAR MEETING 10300 Torre Avenue, City Hall Council Chamber Monday October 21, 2002 5:00 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROLL CALL HOUSING COMMITTEE INTERVIEWS - 5:00 p.m. - Conference Room A 1. Interview applicants for the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission. RECESS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - 6:45 p.m. - Council Chambers CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS 2. Presem a proclamation honoring the Cupertino Union School District (CUSD) teacher of the year. POSTPONEMENTS WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously. 3. Approve the minutes from the September 23, October 7, and October 15 City Council meetings. 4. Adopt resolutions accepting Accounts Payable for October 4 and 11, Resolution Nos. 02- 185 and 02-186. 5. Adopt a resolution accepting Payroll for October 11, Resolution No. 02-187. October 21, 2002 Cupertino City Council & Cupertino Redevelopmem Agency P~e2 Accept imprBv~emems: Sherman Tuan & Yun Zheng, 20706 Kirwin Lane, APN 359-23- 005 (on-site grading, sidewalk, driveway approach, sewer lateral, city tree, curb and gutter work; Tom and Paula Hutton, 22820 San Juan Road, APNs 342-21-023,024, and 025 (retaining walls, curb and gutter work, and paving for road widening); Cupertino City Cemer Associates, Stevens Creek Boulevard at De Anza Boulevard, APN 369-01-029 (Parking). No documentation in packet. Approve a policy to require an integrated pest management approach to pest control at all city-maintained facilities, Resolution No. 02-188. Accept grant of easement for trail purposes (San Tomas Aquino/Saratoga Creek Trail), San Jose Water Company, Resolution No. 02-189. Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a matching share grant agreement with the State of California Energy Commission, for a grant in the amount $37,352.00 and for the City to provide $29,348.00 in matching funds to provide for battery back up systems at 25 major traffic signal locations within the City for a total project cost of $66,700.00, Resolution No. 02-190. 10. Grant a 5 percent salary adjustment to the City Manager for performance from July 10, 2001 to July 9, 2002, Resolution No. 02-191. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) PUBLIC HEARINGS 11. Extend Interim Ordinance No. 1902 regarding Randy Lane and Larry Way (Linwood Acres), APNs 316-02-005 to 073, to January 31, 2003: "An Interim Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Adopting Interim Measures to Immediately Rezone Approximately 19 Acres, Consisting of Sixty-Eight Single-Family Residences, from A 1- 43 Agricultural-Residential Zone and the R1-7.5 Single Family Residence Zone to the P(A 1) Planned Development Zone with Agricultural-Residential Intent and Declaring the Urgency Thereof." 12. Deny appeal of DIR-2002-27 for a temporary use permit issued by the Director of Community Development for a temporary sales trailer, The O'Brien Group, 21151 Canyon Oak Way, APN 342-59-007. The appeal was filed by Mr. Keith Hocker. PLANNING APPLICATIONS 13. Approve application numbers U-2002-07 and EA-2002-12, Cupertino Civic Center (library), 10400 Torte Avenue, APN 369-31-033, for a use permit to demolish the existing Cupertino library, construct a new 53,000 square foot library, and a new 6,300 square foot Community Hall Center / Council Chambers, with accompanying hardscape and landscape improvements. October 21, 2002 Page Cupertino City Council & Cupertino Redevelopment Agency Actions tO l~fft2aken: a). Grant a negative declaration b). Approve the use permit UNFINISHED BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS 14. Consider a request for reinstatement to Public Safety Commission by Marc Majewski, pursuant to his written request (see attached email). 15. Receive a report on commission terms expiring January 15, 2003 and select application deadline dates and interview dates. 16. Select November 18 at 5:00 p.m. in Conference Room C for a joint study session with the Parks and Recreation Commission regarding the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan. 17. Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 1904: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 10.68 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Regarding Definitions" - curfew hours. ORDINANCES STAFF REPORTS COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Richard Lowenthah Economic Development Committee North Central Flood Alternate Northwest Flood Alternate Public Dialog Consortium Santa Clara County Cities Association Santa Clara County Cities Legislative Alternate Santa Clara County Library Joint Powers Authority Toyokawa Sister City Alternate Valley Transportation Authority Policy Advisory Committee - Alternate West Valley Mayors and Managers Vice-Mayor Michael Chang: Audit Committee Leadership Cupertino Legislative Review Committee Library Steering Committee Public Dialog Liaison Santa Clara County Housing and October 21, 2002 Cupertino City Council & Cupertino Redevelopment Agency communi~'Development Block G~mit (CDBG) Alternate Santa Clara County Library JPA Alternate West Valley Mayors and Managers Alternate Page 4 Councilmember Sandra James: Association of Bay Area Governments Economic Development Committee Environmental Review Committee Alternate Library Steering Committee Skate Park Committee Santa Clara County Emergency Preparedness Santa Clara Valley Water Alternate Couneilmember Patrick Kwok: Leadership Cupertino Library Steering Committee Alternate North Central Flood Zone Northwest Flood Zone Santa Clara Valley Water Santa Clara County Cities Alternate Skate Park Alternate Toyokawa Sister City Councilmember Dolly Sandoval: Association of Bay Area Governments (ABA) Alternate Audit Committee Environmental Review Committee Legislative Review Committee Santa Clara County Cities Legislative Review Santa Clara County Emergency Preparedness Alternate Santa Clara County Housing and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Valley Transportation Authority Policy Advisory Committee CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to November 4 at 5:00 p.m. in Conference Room C for a joint study session with the Planning Commission, meeting with representatives of the Chamber of Commeme and all other interested parties, regarding the proposed Downtown Village Specific Plan. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Canceled for lack of business. CUPERTINO DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Regular Adjourned Meeting Monday, September 23, 2002 ROLL CALL At 4:10 p.m. Mayor Lowenthal called the meeting to order at City Hall, 10300 Tome Avenue, Cupertino, California, for a van tour of various portions of the Stevens Creek Trail City Council members present: Mayor Richard Lowenthal, Vice-Mayor Michael Chang, and Council members Sandra James, Patrick Kwok, and Dolly Sandoval. Council members absent: None. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Parks and Recreation Director Therese Smith, City Clerk Kimberly Smith, and environmental planner/consultant Java Sokalee. Joining the meeting at various tour stops were members of the public, including Deborah Jamison, Bob Levy, Susan Seifert, David Scionti, Don Burnett, Jearmie Bradford, and Alex Carlton. Tour the alignment of Stevens Creek Trail. A. Rancho San Antonio Park · Trail head · De Anza Knoll · Views of the PG&E substation and Hammond house B. Linda Vista Park · Haul mad C. McClellan Ranch Park D. Blackberry Farm · Proposed depressed tunnel · Back parking lot · Simm's Property · Stocklmeir Property · Phar Lap crossing · Blue Pheasant/Blackberry Farm Golf Course parking September 23, 2002 Cupertino City Council Page 2 RECESS Council recessed from 6:50 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 7:00 p.m. Mayor Lowenthal called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor Richard Lowenthal, Vice-Mayor Michael Chang, and Council members Sandra James, Patrick Kwok, and Dolly Sandoval. Council members absent: None. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Parks and Recreation Director Therese Smith, Public Information Officer Rick Kitson, Recreation Supervisors Christine Hanel and Michael O'Dowd, City Clerk Kimberly Smith, and environmental planner/consultant Jana Sokale. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS David Scionti reported that he had been concerned about the proposal to allow DACA swim classes at Blackberry Farm. However, it was going smoothly, and they were using portable light stands that direct the light away from his home. Although traffic has been heavier than he had expected because cars arrive in 30-minnte intervals, there have been no problems with noise from the swim classes. NEW BUSINESS Review and approve the Draft Feasibility Report for the Stevens Creek Trail Adopt the mitigated negative declaration. Adopt Resolution No. 02-176 authorizing a grant application under the Recreational Trails Program. Therese Smith and Jana Sokale reviewed a PowerPoint slide show titled Stevens Creek Trail Feasibility Report and Study Area A Environmental Review, and distfibnted copies to Council. The slides included the following: · location of the study areas · the goals of the feasibility study, · the trail planning process · the work products, including a trail feasibility report, Study Area A Initial Study, ' biological and geotechaical reports, operations and maintenance report, trail funding report, and ecological restoration report. September 23, 2002 Cupertino City Council Page 3 There were additional slides specific to proposed improvements for each of the specific study areas. The summary of major issues included: · Providing adequate parking · Appropriate surfacing material · Crossing at McClellan Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard · Alignment through McClellan Ranch · Alignment along the haul road · Fee use vs. free txall use · Property values · Safety and security All proposed trail alignments would total approximately 6.45 miles of trails, approximately 1.25 miles of bicycle lanes, one new crosswalk at Stevens Creek Boulevard, and either a new crosswalk or a new bridge and trail underpass at McClellan Road. The slides also referenced mitigation measures for the following: biological resources · transportation/traffic · public services cultural impacts · hydrology/water quality · noise · air quality Consultant Jana Sokale explained that the staging at the Hammond House is for trail users. The Historical Society will need a parking lot in the future when it develops, but they have asked that parking not be allowed right by the house except to address the needs of the disabled. She explained that at this time dogs would be prohibited because the property is attached to the Mid- Peninsula Regional Open Space District preserve and Santa Clara County Park lands which both have a no-dog policy for those areas adjacent to the trail. Dogs will be allowed at the stables because that is private property that is leased to Whispering Creek Stables by PG&E. Robert Levy, 10802 Wilkinson, said he is a trail user, and has high hopes that the Stevens Creek Trail will someday be completed, but not under the current situation. He said the feasibility study, although it is a good idea, is not yet complete or correct. He felt that many items in the negative declaration were only the author's opinion, and on that basis the request for grant ftmds is to some extent fiaud. David Greenstein, a resident of Byme Avenue, was in favor of the proposed action. This is not a design document, but only a feasibility study. There are actually three parts to the project, and is not just restricted to the Stevens Creek Trail. David Scionti, 22079 San Femando Court, referred Council to a web site at fobbf, org regarding the Friends of Blackberry Farm, and said there was a lot of historical information on that site. He 3-3 September 23, 2002 Cupertino City Council Page 4 pointed out that some of the more difficult areas to address would be the haul road, especially if the trail would be on piers, and t_he crossing over Stevens Creek Boulevard. He said that the trail must be kept close to the creek through Blackberry Farm. There is already erosion at the creek caused by ground squirrels. He noted that the new Astoria development is already advertising direct access to the trail, which will bring more traffic. He asked that the entrance to Blackberry Farm be moved to a better location. Mary Jo Gunderson, 22074 Baxley Ct., said she appreciated all the work and outreach that had taken place with the residents of the Linda Vista neighborhood. If a trail is to be accepted by the neighborhood, a cost/benefit solution will be needed. She asked that counsel be careful with any furore changes and to keep the neighborhood involved and supportive. Cornelia Woodworth, La Paloma Drive, said she was very much in favor of the trail and asked that it be available for multiple users including bicyclists, skaters, hikers, etc. Barry Feeley, 22043 Baxley Court, said there were 100 people who had signed the petition about Area C, the haul road. They are concerned about privacy and safety issues, and it is important to provide good security. There are already problems in their backyards with the homeless. He said that Council should consider all sections of the trail together. He felt this project needs more consideration, and that the committee reviewing the project should include more opponents. Mike Vroman, 10681 Johnson Avenue, was in favor of all the actions and as well as a multiuse trail. He said that the fears raised during plans for the Mountain View trail had proved to be groundless. May Koski 22030 Regnart Road, spoke in favor of the project and that as much of it as possible be designed for multiple uses. Deborah Jamison, 21346 Rumford Drive, said that she has been a proponent of this project in many ways. She has been critical of the feasibility report and there are good alternatives other than what was proposed. She said that Areas C and D were her main areas of concern and she was glad that more study was being down. She asked that the Council please honor the nature preserve of McClellan Ranch. She read an excerpt from the pla~ing commission minutes regarding alignments and said a more detailed analysis of the master plan process must be completed. Alex Carlton, 10062 Scenic, said he was president of the homeowners association in that area. He said that the trail and the Stocklmeir orchard is an important topic in his neighborhood. There is confusion over the purpose and the use of the trail and how it will tie into other city trails. He feared the problems would not be well addressed, and asked that Council listened carefully to the immediate neighbors. '~ Alex Tsai, 21975 San Femando Ave., said he agreed with the previous speaker. More clarification is needed on the C and D areas, and he did not think the project was feasible as presented. He said the neighbors and the task force had rejected it and that they should continue studying and identifying issues. 3-¥ September 23, 2002 Cupert/no City Council Page 5 Anne Ng, 6031 Bollinger Road, said she was in favor oft.he proposed action on Area A. She said she is a member of the Bicycle Pedestrian Adviso~ Committee, and her bicycle is her primary vehicle. She preferred a multi-use trail, and did not think it would be a transportation route for serious cyclists except for one part where it is level, and probably not by Blackberry Farm. She asked that all portions be kept open for bicycle access. Don Burnett, 729 Stendhal Lane, said he agreed with Anne Ng that most cyclists will only use the level parts of the trail, and McClellan Avenue is the best route. He said it was important to avoid Stevens Canyon Road. Jeanne Bradford, Vice Chairperson of the Cupertino Parks and Recreation Commission, said she also served on the task fome. She said this had been a huge effort with many meetings and a lot of public input, and no one was neutral. In most places the diverging points of view helped the task fome to find solutions to many issues. The scope of the assignment was not to resolve the details of every alignment, but it gave them a good understanding of neighborhood issues. Linda Wegner, 10200 Hillcrest Road, said she was a cyclist and a jogger and is in favor of a multi-use trail. Patty Ciesla, Los Altos Hills County Parks Commissioner representing District 5 was in favor of the proposed action on item A. She said the County Parks Commission is interested in the potential of more recreation facilities in this area of the County, and perhaps they will be able to collaborate on some portion of the Blackberry Farm solution. She said this trail will be an amenity for the whole County, and she asked that the trail access designations be consistent so that bicycles are not fomed onto streets, and that it is a family friendly trail system throughout. She opposed allowing bicycles and equestrians onto the De Anza Knoll, and suggested a multi- use trail location where bicycles could be locked up while people climbed to the top of the Knoll. Joan Meehan, 20182 Northcove Square, said she was a big supporter of this project, especially area A, and 38 of the equestrians at the Whispering Creek Stables signed a petition in favor of it. They will be able to ride their horses to Rancho San Antonio in 10 minutes instead of taking a half-hour to trailer the horses over. She also supported the other trail areas, and was in favor of multi-use trails. Robert Levy, 10802 Wilkinson Avenue, said he agreed that Area A will be a big bonus for cyclists, but most will remain on McClellan Road. Off-road bikers will enjoy the trail into the quarry, where it is more challenging. He said that if Council waits until the Canyon Heights Academy issue is decided, a different solution is needed. ADJOURNMENT At 9:20 p.m. the meeting was adjourned. Kimberly Smith, City Clerk 3-5- September 23, 2002 Cupertino City Council Page 6 For more information: Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the meeting are available for review at the City Clerk's Office, 777-3223. Televised Council meetings may be viewed live on Cable Channel 26, and may also be viewed live or on demand at www. cupertino.om. Videotapes of the televised meetings are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City Channel, 777-2364. CUPERJINO DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting Monday, October 7, 2002 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 6:45 p.m. Mayor Lowenthal called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor Richard Lowenthal, Vice-Mayor Michael Chang, and Council members Sandra James, Patrick Kwok, and Dolly Sandoval. Council members absent: None. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood, City Attorney Charles Kilian, Parks and Recreation Director Therese Smith, Public Information Officer Rick Kitson, Parks and Recreation Supervisor Mike O'Dowd; Assistant Public Works Director Glen Goepfert, City Planner Cynthia Wordell, Senior Planner Aarti Shrivastava, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith. CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS Receive a report from the Cupertino Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) regarding its accomplishments. David Greenstein, chairman of the Cupertino Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, gave a PowerPoint slide presentation reviewing the committee's accomplishments for the year and recommending some goals for consideration by the newly forming Bicycle Pedestrian Commission. POSTPONEMENTS - None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Jim Homer, 23293 Summit Road, said he had been a contractor with Tally's Enterprises for more than 10 years. He discussed complaints filed against the company that claimed that State- mandated prevailing wages had not been paid, and which had been previously brought to the October 7, 2002 . Cupertino City Council Page 2 attention of Council member Sandoval and staff. He referred to a demand letter by the State of California ordering Tally's Enterprises to pay of $391,000. He asked the City Council to bar this contractor from working in the city. The City Attorney asked to see some written documentation of the claim, and said if the contractor failed to pay prevailing wage on a city contract, the city can immediately end the contract and bar future awards. If the failure to pay did not occur on the city contract, then the city's responsibility is to determine if this is a responsible bidder. He explained that the demand letter is the commencement of a process, not a final determination, and it puts the city on notice that there's a need to investigate. Atenogene Huerta, speaking through a translator, said that he had worked for Tally's Enterprises for 8 or 9 months, and was only paid $10/hour for doing concrete work, which he did not think was fair. Neil Strothers said he was the Chief Executive Officer for the building trade council. He asked the city council to consider adopting resolutions and policies which would change contracts to require certified payrolls and laws before progress payments are made, implement a labor compliance program, and consider implementing a pre-quaiification process. Council asked the City attorney to investigate the matter. He said he would report back in 30 days. CONSENT CALENDAR James/Kwok moved to approve items 2-18 on the Consent Calendar as recommended. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. 2. Approve the minutes from the September 16 City Council meeting. Adopt a resolution accepting Accounts Payable for September 13, 20, and 27, Resolution Nos. 02-177, 02-178, and 02-179. 4. Adopt a resolution accepting Payroll for September 27, Resolution No. 02-180. 5. Accept the Treasurer's Budget Report - August 2002. Approve the destruction of records from Finance and Code Enforcement files that are in excess of two years old, Resolution No. 02-181. ~ Adopt a resolution setting the date of November 4 to approve the annexation of area~ designated "Byme Avenue 02-06", property located on the west side of Byrne Avenue between McClellan Road and Dolores Avenue; approximately 0.149 acre, Xu (APN 357- 12-038), Resolution No. 02-182. October 7, 2002 - Cupertino City Council Page 3 Adopt a resolution setting the date of November 4 to approve the reorganization of area designated "Creston Drive 01-04", property located on the north side of Creston Drive between Berkeley Court and Aldemey Court; approximately 0.335 acre, Hsu and Chen (APN 326-12-060), Resolution No. 02-183. Adopt a resolution making determinations and approving the reorganization of area designated "Creston Drive 02-03", property located on the north side of Creston Drive between Berkeley Court and Foothill Boulevard; approximately 0.541 acre, Johnson and Whittaker (APN 326-12-062), Resolution No. 02-184. 10. Approve a fee waiver request from the Cupertino Symphonic Band in the approximate amount of $487.50 in facility use fees for two free public events: 1). A Veterans Day Concert on November 8, 2002 ($375.50). 2). A Holiday Concert on December 11, 2002 ($112.00). Both events will be at the Quinlan Center. 11. Approve a fee waiver request from the League of Women Voters of Cupertino-Sunnyvale in the approximate amount of $100.00 in facility use fees for a Candidates Forum for citizens of Cupertino on October 23, 2002, at the Quinlan Center. 12. Approve a fee waiver request from the Fremont Union High School District (FUHSD) Board of Trustees in the approximate mount of $75.00 in facility use fees for a FUHSD reception for a new superintendent on October 10, 2002, at the Quinlan Center. 13. Approve a fee waiver request from the Iranian Federated Women's Club and Payvand Cultural School in the approximate amount of $2,974.00 in facility use fees for its Sixth Annual Arts and Cultural event that was held at the Quinlan Community Center on Sunday, September 29, 2002. 14. Approve a fee waiver request fi.om the Cupertino Rotary Club in the amount of $9,133.00 in facility use fees for the 2002 Oktoberfest. 15. Accept improvements: Roger and Annie Wang (grading, off-site improvements.), 11631 Upland Way, APN 316-21-029. (No documentation in packet). 16. Accept progress report on E-Waste program. 17. Accept informational report on environmental policies. 18. Receive a report on the schedule to revise Chapter 10.48 (Noise Ordinance) of the Cupertino Municipal Code regarding home maintenance activities - leaf blowers. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) - None PUBLIC HEARINGS - None October 7, 2002 , Cupertino City Council Page 4 PLANNING APPLICATIONS 19. Approve applications M-2002-07 and EA-2002-13 located at 10441 Bandley Avenue, City of Cupertino (APN 369-33-079). The Cupertino public library proposes to occupy this space while the new library is being constructed. a). b). Grant a Negative Declaration Approve modification of an approved use permit (2-U~77) to allow a temporary library use (Cupertino Public Library) in an existing industrial office building at 10441 Bandley Drive James/Chang moved to adopt a Negative Declaration. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. James/Chang moved to approve the modification to the use permit. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None NEW 20. BUSINESS Receive a report on the Community Survey conducted by Godbe Research for the Blackberry Farm Master Plan. Parks and Recreation Director Therese Smith reviewed a PowerPoint slide presentation titled "Stevens Creek Corridor, Stakeholders' Visions, Final Report." That report summarized the major themes heard in the participants' discussions as well as their visions for the Stevens Creek Corridor Trail. "Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan Presentation." They included a histo~, of Blackberry Farm acquisition, statistics about services and amenities provided to visitors, fees and revenues, and facility improvements. Consultant Brian Godbe reviewed slides titled "City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Survey, Oct. 7, 2002." He reviewed the objectives and methodology of the study and discussed charts that illustrated responses to the survey. The conclusions were: · Over 80 percent of respondents supported the proposal of adding a network of multi- use trails along Stevens Creek. · Residents were split on whether the trails should allow multiple uses or just be used for walking. · Preservation of McClellan Ranch and restoration of Stevens Creek are among the top three priorities. People are concemed with park revenue, but there are strong majorities and pluralities of respondents support eliminating the entry fee and charging for picnic or pool use. Less than ten percent of respondents indicated that changes should be made at the picnic grounds, McClellan Ranch Park, the golf course, or the swimming pool. 3 -/0 October 7, 2002 · Cupertino City Council Page 5 · Reducing fees for the swimming pools is a top priority, and residents would like to see the pool open year-round, and the number of pools increased or the current pools enlarged. The majority of respondents do not want to see the golf course changed and are more supportive of maintaining the Stocklmeir property and picnic grounds than enlarging the golf course. · Respondents felt that the picnic grounds at Blackberry Farm should be moved away from the creek to facilitate creek restoration, the facility should be upgraded and include a playground for children, and respondents would like to see more community events. · McClellan Ranch Park preservation was among the top three priorities of respondents, and most residents preferred keeping the Blue Pheasant Restaurant as it is, with changes in hours and menu, rather than converting it to a golf and snack shop. Marc Auerbach, Planning Commissioner, suggested that there be guiding principles to inform the direction of the corridor development, such as nature conservation, revenue generation, etc. His primary goal was the creek restoration, and he suggested a sof~ surface near the creek and a harder surface father away from it. He said that it is important to be very clear about the definitions of the terms trail and open space. Bill Walster, 22116 Dean Court, distributed and read a letter dated October 7, 2002, objecting to the process used to present the information and to solicit input from the citizens about the use and alignment of the trail. He also questioned some of the tabulation methods used in the survey. Rhoda Fry, 10351 San Femando Avenue, said she and her neighbors were excluded from the Stevens Creek Corridor feasibility report. She referred to the removal of trees along Blackberry Farm and asked that they be replanted. She also asked that Council consider moving the Blackberry Farm entrance and conduct a traffic study. Deborah Jamison, 21346 Rumford Drive, asked for clarification on the telephone survey and how they reached people who didn't answer in the evenings, or who had business and residential phones on the same number. She asked for a copy of the survey. Jamison said that the Simms property is a part of the McClellan Ranch and felt it should be considered an extension of it. She said that the trail has four elements to consider, which are not defined by calling it "multi-use." Those elements are the surface, width, alignment, and usage. Abe Sanches, 1726 Delaware Avenue, suggested the city contact the city of Santa Cruz, which has many multi-use trails in its community. He also asked about how the telephone prefixes were selected. '~ Brian Godbe explained in greater detail the methodology for reaching survey respondents. October 7, 2002 Cupertino City Council Page 6 Council accepted the report. Therese Smith said the next step would be to take this to Parks and Recreation Commission to accept public comments. However, some general policy guidance would be needed before then. The Council concurred to hold a study session at Blackberry Farm to focus on a few key items, and asked the staff to place an item on the next agenda to select dates and times for a joint study session with the Parks and Recreation Commission. 21. Consider setting the date of November 4 at 5:00 p.m. for a study session with the representatives of the Chamber of Commerce regarding the General Plan revision. Council concurred to hold a joint study session of the City Council and the Planning Commission on November 4, meeting with the Chamber of Commerce and all other interested parties regarding the proposed Downtown Village Specific Plan. ORDINANCES 22. Conduct the second reading of Ordinance No. 1901: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 19.84, Second Dwelling Units in R-1, RHS, A and A-1 Zones, of the Cupertino Municipal Code." The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. James/Kwok moved to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. James/Kwok moved to enact Ordinance No. 1901. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. 23. Conduct the second reading of Ordinance No. 1903: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Authorizing an Amendment to the Contract Between the City Council of the City of Cupertino and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System to enhance 1959 survivor benefits." The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. James/Sandoval moved to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None. James/Sandoval moved to enact Ordinance No. 1903. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthai, Sandoval. Noes: None. STAFF REPORTS - None COUNCIL REPORTS Council members highlighted the activities of their commi~ees and various community events. October 7, 2002 Cupertino City Council Page 7 CLOSED SESSION - None ADJOURNMENT At 9:30 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to October 14 at 3:30 p.m. at Blackberry Farm Retreat Center, 21975 San Fernando Ave., Cupertino, for a closed session regarding performance evaluation pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 for an evaluation of the City Manager. Kimberly Smith, City Clerk For more information: Staff repons, backup materials, and items distributed at the meeting are available for review at the City Clerk's Office, 777-3223. Televised Council meetings may be viewed live on Cable Channel 26, and may also be viewed live or on demand at www.cupertino.org. Videotapes of the televised meetings are available at the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City Channel, 777-2364. 3-13 CUPi INO. DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITy COUNCIL Special Meeting Tuesday, October 15, 2002 5:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER At 5:10 p.m. Mayor Lowenthal called the meeting to order at the Blackberry Farm Retreat Center, 21975 San Femando Ave., Cupertino. ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor Richard Lowenthal, Vice-Mayor Michael Chang, and Council members Sandra James, Patrick Kwok, and Dolly Sandoval. Council members absent: None. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None CLOSED SESSION At 5:11 p.m. Council recessed to a closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 regarding evaluation of the City Manager. At 9:25 p.m. Council reconvened and announced that in closed session, Council voted to give the City Manager a 5 percent salary adjustment due to his performance from July 10, 2001 to July 9, 2002. The raise will be effective July 15, 2002. ADJOURNMENT At 9:30 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to Oct. 21, 2002, at 5:00 p.m. in Conference Room A, for interviews for the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission. - DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 02485 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FI_YNDS AS HEKEINAFTEK DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING OCTOBER 04, 2002 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the .following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Director of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21stdayof 0etober ,2002, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 10/03/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "09/30/2002" and "10/04/2002" CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 596338 1020 596339 1020 596340 1028 896341 1020 596342 1020 596343 1020 S96343 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596344 1020 596345 1020 596346 1020 596347 1020 596349 1020 596349 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596380 1020 596351 1020 596352 1020 596353 1020 696353 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596354 1020 596354 1020 596354 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596355 1020 896356 1020 896357 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 10/04/02 2679 10/04/02 1695 10/04/02 1744 I0/04/02 2539 10/04/02 29 10/04/02 1884 10/04/02 1884 /ETC/NETWORKS 6104800 SM 2708405 AARON'S SEPTIC TANK SERV 5606620 ACS STATE & LOCAL SOLD"TI 1102101 AI~ERTEONS-NORT~RNDIVI 1106342 10/04/02 2319 10/04/02 M 10/04/02 48 10/04/02 96 10/04/02 2801 10/04/02 2501 i0/04/02 968 10/04/02 968 10/04/02 M 10/04/02 M2003 10/04/02 1066 10/04/02 874 10/04/02 874 10/04/02 808 10/04/02 509 i0/04/02 500 CALIFOUNIA PUBLIC EMPLOY 1104510 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOY 1104510 CALIFORIgIA PUBLIC EMPLOY 110 10/04/02 M2003 CALPERS CONFERENCE 2002 1104510 10/04/02 M2003 CALT~S 1108601 18/04/02 1460 TONI CARREIRO 6104800 10/04/02 1460 TONI CARREIRO 1106349 SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0O 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE i AMOUNT 860.00 340.26 165.00 7535.00 216.00 9.29 25.23 34.52 7487.40 12.50 222.40 131.03 15.82 27 RUN DATE 10/03/02 TIME 11:35:45 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING zo/o3/oz ACCO~INO PERIOD: 4/03 CITY OF CUPERTINO 1020 596358 10/04/02 147 C-~R 5506549 1020 596358 10/04/02 147 CASH 5606549 1020 596358 10/04/02 147 CASH 5506E49 1020 696359 10/04/02 149 C~H 1100000 1020 596389 10/04/02 149 C~SH 4239222 1020 E96359 10/04/02 149 C~R 1101000 1020 896559 10/04/02 149 C,~R 1108801 1020 596359 10/04/02 149 CASH 1104000 1020 596359 10/04/02 149 CASH 1108~03 1020 896359 10/04/02 149 CA~R 1108101 1020 596359 10/04/02 149 CASH 1104E10 1020 E96359 10/04/02 149 CASR 1104300 TOTAL CHECK 1020 896360 10/04/02 2125 CASHIER-DEFT OF PESTICID 1108%07 (LHANG, SI-EN 580 1020 596362 10/04/02 M CEAO, INGRID 580 1020 596363 10/04/02 1453 C~ISTOP~ERS CARPET SERV 1108504 10/04/02 166 KI~ERLY MARIE CLARK 5806449 1020 596365 10/04/02 192 1020 596365 10/04/02 192 1020 596365 10/04/02 192 1020 596365 10/04/02 192 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596366 10/04/02 175 COCA-COLAUSA 5606620 1020 896366 10/04/02 175 COCA-COLA USA 5606620 1020 596366 10/04/02 175 COCA-COLA USA 5606620 1020 596366 10/04/02 175 COCA-COLA USA 5606620 1020 S96966 10/04/02 175 COCA-COLA USA 5608620 1020 596266 10/04/02 176 COCA-C0~AUSA 5606620 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 596367 10/04/02 178 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 110 1020 596368 10/04/02 183 COTTON SHIRES & ASSO INC 110 1020 596369 1 596370 10/04/02 197 CTC F~ING, LLC ll01E00 10/04/02 1973 T~E CUPERTINO EISTORICAL 1101000 PAGE 2 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 0.00 2390.05 PETTY CASH 9/24-9/30 0.00 30.00 PETTY CASH 9/24-9/30 0.00 73.22 PETTY CASH 9/24-9/50 0.00 24.88 PE'~ CASH 9/24-9/30 0.00 7.66 pETTY C.~SR 9/24-9/30 0.00 15.14 0.00 150.92 PETTY CASH 9/16-10/02 0.00 -0.10 PETTY CASH 9/16-10/02 0.00 10.00 PETTY CASH 9/16-10/02 0.00 15.00 PETTY CASH 9/16-10/02 0.00 57.60 PETTY CASH 9/16-10/02 0.00 32.90 PETTY CASH 9/16-10/02 0.00 lB.00 PETT~ CASH 9/16-10/02 0.00 29.57 PETTY CASH 9/16-10/02 0.00 14.73 0.00 175.88 LICENSE RNWL M.LOOMIS 0.00 30.00 R~FUNDS 173011 & 17301 0.00 120.00 Refund: Check - FALL. 0.00 26.00 CARPET REPAIRS 0.00 120.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 150.00 FOUNTAIN MACHILNES 9/0 0.00 21.65 FOUNTAIN MACHINES 9/02 0.00 27.06 FOUNTAIN MACHINES 9/02 O.O0 21.65 FOUNTAIN MACHILNEE 9/0 0.00 21.68 FOY3ITTAIN MACHINES 9/02 0.00 21.65 FOD/~TAIN MACHINES 9/02 0.00 21.65 0.00 135.31 PREMIUM 10/01-10/31/02 0.00 36.55 GEOLOGIC REVW #19610 0.00 '= 1448.40 RENT 10/2002 0.00 4341.00 TOWARDS T~E GOLDEN ~ 0.00 243.66 RUN DATE 10/03/02 TIM~ 11:35:46 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 10/03/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "09/30/2002" and "10/84/2002" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SAL~S TAX AMOUNT 1020 596371 1020 596372 1020 596372 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596373 1020 596374 1020 596374 TOTAL C~ECK 10/04/02 194 10/04/02 209 10/04/02 209 10/04/02 2601 10/04/02 220 10/04/02 220 1020 596375 10/04/02 M2003 1020 596376 10/04/02 2664 1020 596377 10/04/02 281 1020 596377 10/04/02 251 1020 596377 10/04/02 261 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596378 1020 696379 1020 596380 1020 596381 1020 596382 1020 596382 1020 596382 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596383 1020 596363 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596384 1020 596384 1020 596384 1020 596384 1020 996384 1020 596384 1020 596384 1020 596384 1020 596388 1020 596384 1020 996384 1020 996384 10/04/02 M2003 10/04/02 260 10/04/02 2558 10/04/02 2304 10/04/02 1255 10/04/02 1268 10/04/02 1265 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 2361 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 5608640 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 5606640 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 5606620 F U H S FOUNDATION 1101000 FEDEPJtL EXPRESS CORP 5208003 FEET FIRST ENTERTAINMENT 5806349 FIELD PAOLI ARCHITECTURE 4269212 FIRST AUTOMOTIVE DISTRIB 6308840 FIRST AUTOMOTIVE DISTRIB 6308840 FIRST AUTOMOTIVE DISTRIB 6308840 FIRST BANKCARD 1101200 FIRST BANKCARD i101000 FIRST BANKCA~D 1106343 FIRST BANKCARD 5806449 FIRST BANKCARD 1106647 FIRST BANKCARD 1106400 FIRST BANKCAI~D 6806449 FIRST BANKCARD 1101060 FIRST BANKCARD 1101065 FIRST BANKCARD 1106100 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC JANITORIAL SEPT2002 JANITORIAL SEPT2002 DINNER 10/24 S.JAMES COURIER SERVICE DJ JR DANCE 10/04 PLAN STUDIES EPRT CTE FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC R~TURN P.O.52968 S~PT2002 STATEMENT SEPT2002 STATEMENT SEPT2002 STATEMENT SEPT2002 STATEMENT SEPT2002 STATEMENT SEPT2002 STATEMENT SEPT2002 STATEMENT SEPT2002 STATEMENT 0.00 66.83 0,00 440.03 0,00 440.03 0.00 BB0.06 0.00 208.00 0.00 358.31 0.00 317.12 0.00 675.43 0.00 500.00 0,00 240.00 0.00 3500.00 0.00 1080.00 0.00 1350.00 0.00 5930.00 0,00 125.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 16,57 0.00 56.72 0.00 136.40 0.00 -65.51 0.00 127.61 0.00 14.04 0.00 299.50 0.00 313.84 0.00 62.25 0.00 7.05 0,00 33.20 0.00 219.00 0.~0 498.00 0,00 657.00 0.00 193.75 0.00 ~ 286.40 0.00 219.00 0.00 599.74 0.00 984.14 0.00 ~7.57 RUN DATE 10/03/02 TIME 11:35:47 lO/O3/O2 CITY OF CUPBRTIN0 CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 596394 1020 596364 TOTAL CH~CK ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 10/04/02 2361 FIRST BA~KC.A~.D 1106200 10/04/02 2361 FIRST B~C. ARD 5806249 1020 596386 10/04/02 2561 FIRST B~CARD 1108901 1020 596386 10/04/02 2361 FIRST BANKCA~ 1108505 1020 596386 10/04/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1108504 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596387 10/04/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 5606620 1020 596587 10/04/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 8606620 TOTA~ CHECK 1020 596388 596389 1020 596391 1020 596591 1020 596391 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596392 1020 596393 1020 996394 1020 596395 1020 596395 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596396 1020 596397 1020 596398 1020 596399 1020 596400 596401 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 2361 10/04/02 1461 10/04/02 274 10/04/02 274 10/04/02 274 10/04/02 281 i0/04/02 10/04/02 296 10/04/02 1741 10/04/02 1741 10/04/02 2789 GRADE TECH INC 4209116 10/04/02 298 GRAINGER INC 1108407 10/04/02 2322 GP~HIC PRODUCTS 1108101 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SEPT2002 STATEMENT SEPT2002 STATEMENT SEPT2002 STATEMENT SEPT2002 STATE~NT SUPPLIES 15908 MAII~fENANCE 7,8,9/2002 SERVICE AGRS~4ENT FOR VIEWSONIC 19" FLAT SCR SUPPLIES 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 PAGE 4 ,L 219.00 219.00 4175.10 1700.00 45.95 106.65 187.49 2040.09 71.76 67.81 82.78 222.39 81.52 917.87 999.39 203.34 242.30 7000.00 194.82 -32.45 36.78 199.15 269.64 2571.00 1550.00 1578.30 15.91 1594.21 24750.00 61.29 4865.00 300.00 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 5 AMOUNT SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 450.00 OVERPYMT BUSINESS LIC. 0.00 98.00 GROUP BOWLING 9/27 0.00 I12.0O Refund: Check - SL'~94ER 0.00 51.67 OFFIC~ SUPPLIES/C~RT 0.00 103.54 REFD pLAN APPLICATION 0.00 1022.00 REFD PLAN A~PLICATION 0.00 400.00 0.00 1422.00 DUES D.MA~L~N 2003 0.00 185.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 770.87 941 QTR END 9/30/02 0.00 29.82 RefUnd: Check - FALL, 0.00 719.20 SUPPLIES 0.00 .76 RUN DATE 10/03/02 TIME 11~35:40 lo/o3/o2 4/03 CITY OF CUP.TIN0 transact.trans_daEe between "09/30/2002" and "10/04/2002" FUND - 110 - GEN~P~AL FUND CASH ACCT C~CK NO 1020 596426 10/04/02 1599 1020 596427 10/04/02 1699 1020 596427 10/04/02 1698 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 596428 10/04/02 2713 1020 596429 10/04/02 438 1020 596429 10/04/02 435 1020 596444 10/04/02 493 10.~ 596444 10/04/02 493 1 596444 10/04/02 493 ISSUE DT .............. VEeR ............. PTIND/DEPT MIKE COUNSIL PLYING, I 5686660 MINTON'S LL~ER 1108501 MOUNTAIN VIEW C44RDEN CEN 1109314 MPA DESIGN 2709447 MPLC:MOTION PICTURE LICE 5506549 SIREN MURky 1101500 ~93SSON ~/qF~ATRICA/~ 1101201 MUSSON T~EATRICAL 1101201 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... · AP OCT2002 A.EOM~O W/E 9/08 A.ROMPO W/E 9/15 BACKFLOW REPAIRS SUPPLIES 26706 SUPPLIES 24329 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC SERVICE AGREF/~ FOR LICENSE 11/24-11/23/03 ~XFENSES 7,8,9/2002 GAFERS TAPE AND RENTAL GAFSRS TAPE AND RENTAL Meyer, Shirley A. 550 Refund: Check - New Yo Miller, Francoise 850 Refund: Cash - Catcher NATIONAL CONS~UCTION RE 1108312 R~fAL 9/18-10/15/02 NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION 5606640 F~RSHp J.PISEECEIO NATURES WOOD 5606620 FY 2002-2009 OPEN PURC NCTLC 1108408 FIELD DAY 9/25 O.K. FIRE EQUIPMENT COMP 1104400 SUPPLIES OFFICE DSPOT 5806449 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE DEPOT 1104300 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE DEPOT 1104080 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE DEPOT 1104000 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE DEPOT 1101000 OFFICE SUPPLIES SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~ROUNT 2041.51 897.00 783.00 971.50 RUN DATE 10/03/02 TIME 11:35:49 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 10/09/02 CIT~ OF CUPERTINO PAGE 7 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/03 C~CK P~GISTER - DISBURSE~ET FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "09/30/2002" and "10/04/2002- CASH ACCT C"AECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VE~iOOR ............. FUND/DEFT 1020 596444 10/04/02 499 OFFICE DEPOT 1106400 1020 596444 10/04/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 2204010 1020 596444 10/04/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108101 1020 596444 10/04/02 495 OFFICE DEPOT 1108601 1020 596444 10/04/02 499 OFFICE DEPOT 1104400 1020 596444 10/04/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1106200 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 596445 10/04/02 505 ORLANDI TRAILER 6108840 1020 596446 10/04/02 2800 pABLO ORTEGA 5606620 1020 596447 10/04/02 511 PACIFIC BEbL/WOPJ~DCOM 1108501 1020 596448 10/04/02 513 1020 596448 10/04/02 513 1020 596440 10/04/02 513 1020 696448 10/04/02 513 1020 596448 10/04/02 519 1020 596448 10/04/02 813 1020 596448 10/04/03 513 1020 596448 10/04/02 513 1020 596448 10/04/02 513 1020 596448 10/04/02 513 1020 596448 10/04/02 513 1020 596448 10/04/02 513 1020 596448 10/04/02 513 1020 596448 10/04/02 513 1020 596448 10/04/02 513 1020 596448 10/04/02 513 1020 596448 10/04/02 513 1020 596448 10/04/02 513 1020 596448 10/04/02 513 TOT;iL CEECK PACIFIC C~ & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & SLEC~IC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIEICGAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC G~ & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC G~ & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GA~ & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108602 1108303 1108506 1108315 1108501 1108830 5208003 5606620 5606640 1108511 5708510 5606620 1108505 1108407 1108314 1108506 1108504 1108507 1108312 1020 596449 10/04/02 1699 PACIPIC GAS & ELECTRIC ( 1108601 1020 596450 10/04/02 515 1020 596450 10/04/02 515 TOTAL CHECK PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108505 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1105505 1020 696451 10/04/02 2462 PECK JUDA~ TRAVEL SERV., 5506549 1020 596452 10/04/02 527 1020 596452 10/04/02 527 1020 596452 10/04/02 527 TOTAL CHECK PENINSDLA BUILDING MATER 1108312 PENINSULA BUILDING MATER 1108314 PENINSULA BUILDING ~tATER 1108312 1020 596453 10/04/02 526 1020 596453 10/04/02 526 1020 596453 10/04/02 526 PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGIN 110 PENINSULJ%DIGITAL IMAGIN 110 PENINSU~ DIGITAL IMAGIN 2709430 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SE.LES TAX OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 9.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 1.07 OFFICS SUPPLIES 0.00 193.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 177.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0,00 106.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 9.19 0.00 829.77 SUPPLIES 0.00 190.00 0.00 0,00 190.00 17.73 SERV TO 9/27/02 0.00 2310.62 SEEV TO 9/27/02 0.00 3968.68 SERV TO 9/27/02 0.00 923.91 SERV TO 9/27/02 0.00 327,4E SERV TO 9/27/02 0.00 8086.69 SERV TO 9/27/02 0.O0 22.08 SENV TO 9/27/02 0.00 10.97 SERV TO 9/27/02 0.00 3.05 SEEV TO 9/27/02 0.00 2a~.47 SERV TO 9/27/02 0.00 SERV TO 9/27/02 0.00 6611.95 SERVTO 9/27/02 0.00 2883.68 SERV TO 9/27/02 0.00 5111.46 SERV TO 9/27/02 0.0O 1981.55 SERV TO 9/27/02 0.00 313.47 SERV TO 9/27/02 0.00 8.96 SERV TO 9/27/02 0.00 9144.57 SERV TO 9/27/02 0.00 1580.05 SERV TO 9/27/02 0.00 428.32 0.00 43825.37 0.00 NEW METER/MCCLELLAN RD SERVICE C~L 9/10 SERVICE CALL 9/09 0.00 0.00 0,00 1500.00 210.00 355.00 565.00 DEPOSIT ITALY TRIP 0.00 7000.00 FARTS/SUPPLIES 8354 0.~0 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8393 0.00 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8368 0.00 0.00 499.41 481.00 497.56 1467.97 IMPROVEMENT PLANS 0.00 145.32 IMPROVEMENT PLANS 0.00 114.85 RUN DATE 10/03/02 TIM~ 11:35:50 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 10/03/02 CITY OZ C~PERTZNO FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT TOTAL (LqECK 1020 596464 10/04/02 537 1020 898454 10/04/02 537 1020 596454 10/04/02 537 1020 996454 10/04/02 937 1020 696464 10/04/02 537 1020 696454 10/04/02 837 TOTAL CKECK pETPRO PRODUCTS INC 1108321 PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 1108312 PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 1108303 PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 1108314 PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 1108302 PETPRO PRODUCTS INC 1106315 1020 696455 10/04/02 542 1020 596455 10/04/02 542 TOTAL C~ECK PINE CONE LEMBEE 5606620 PINE CONE LL~ER 5606620 1020 596456 10/04/02 545 0'EFF PISERC~IO 5606640 1104310 1020 596458 10/04/02 2802 QUANTUM DESIGN 6109869 1020 596459 10/04/02 S90 : 596460 10/04/02 2482 10Z0 596460 10/04/02 2482 1020 696460 10/04/02 2482 1020 596460 10/04/02 2482 TOT;LL CHECK RICH VOSS TRUCKING INC 5208003 ROBERT }U%LF TECHNOLOGY 6104800 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLGNY 6104800 ROBERT HALF TEC~NOLDU¥ 6104800 ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 6104800 1020 596461 10/04/02 899 1020 596461 10/04/02 599 TOTAL CHECK ROSS RECT{EATION EQUIi~MEN 1108314 ROSS RECREATION EQUIPMEN 1108314 1020 596462 10/04/02 600 1020 596462 10/04/02 600 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596463 10/04/02 601 ROYAL BRASS INC 6308840 110 1020 596464 10/04/02 M2003 ROYAL POOLS 1020 596465 10/04/02 2043 1020 596465 10/04/02 2043 1020 596485 10/04/02 2043 1020 696465 10/04/02 2043 1020 596465 10/04/02 2043 TOTAL CHECK' 1020 596466 10/04/02 345 1020 596466 10/04/02 345 SAN FRANCISCO ELEVATOR 1108502 SAN FRANCISCO ELEVATOR 1108501 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SAL~S TAX 0.00 FY 2002-2003 OPE/g PCHC 0.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 FY 2002-2008 OPEN PURC 0.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 AMOUNT 925.37 725.86 725.87 725.87 725.86 725.87 725.86 4355.19 ~W.IPPLIES F.0.15777 0.00 415.47 EN'~O~N P.0.15777 0.00 -194.76 0.00 220.71 BBF GOLF CONCESSIONAIR 0.00 POSTAGE METER FEES 0.00 WEB HOSTING/SET-UP 0.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN pt/B.C 0.00 J.SEVERANCE W/E 8/30 0.00 J.SEVERANCE W/E 9/06 0.00 J.SEVERA~CE W/E 9/20 0.00 J.SEVERANCE B/E 9/13 0.00 0.00 213.59 3250.00 700.00 1008.00 1006.00 1008.00 672.00 3696.00 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8672 0.00 679.00 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8672 0.00 170.55 0.00 849.55 S~W~R LINE CLEAN-OUT 0.00 SEWER LINE CLEAN-OUT 0.00 0.00 220,00 110.00 330.00 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8401 0.00 284.40 RODENT CONTROL 0.00 180.00 RODENT CONTROL 0.00 180.00 RODE/~T CONTROL 0.00 180.00 RODENT CONTROL 0%00 180.00 RODENT CONTROL 0.00 180.00 0.00 900.00 .L 0.00 0.00 0,00 FY 2002~2003 OPEN PCRC FY 2002-2003 OPEN pURC 148.44 440.01 588.45 RUN DATE 10/03/02 TIME 11:35:50 CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 596467 1020 596468 1020 596469 1020 596470 1020 596470 1020 596470 1020 596470 1020 596470 1020 596470 1020 586470 TOTAL C~IECK 1020 596471 1020 596471 1020 596471 1020 596471 1020 596471 1020 596471 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596472 1020 596473 1020 896474 1020 596475 1020 596476 1020 596477 1020 596477 TOTAL CRRCK 1020 596478 1020 596479 1020 596479 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596480 1020 S96481 1020 596482 1020 896482 1020 596482 1020 596482 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 10/04/02 626 SANTA CLARA CO DEPT OF R 1182100 10/04/02 1249 SANTA CLAR~COUNT~ 5208003 10/04/02 1636 SANTA CLAP~ CTY SHERIFF 1104510 i0/04/02 633 10/04/02 633 10/04/02 63E 10/04/02 633 10/04/02 633 10/04/02 633 10/04/02 633 10/04/02 639 10/04/02 639 10/04/02 639 10/04/02 639 10/04/02 639 10/04/02 639 SAVIN CORPOP~TION (COPIE 5806349 SAVIN CORPORATION (COPIE 5506549 SAVIN CORPOP. ATION (COPIE 1104310 SAUIN CORPORATION (COPIE 5706450 SAVIN CORPORATION (COPIE 5806249 SAVIN CORPORATION {COPIE 5806449 10/04/02 M 10/04/02 647 10/04/02 M 10/04/02 M 10/04/02 200 10/04/02 1954 10/04/02 1954 SEGAL, SAPJ~q 580 ELIZA~ET~ SHANNON 5806449 SNECHINA WORLD MISSION 580 SHEEHAN, ANN MARIE 580 LESLIE SOKOL DBA DANCEKI 5806449 SPEERION CORPORATION 1108201 SPRERION CORPORATION 1108201 10/04/02 991 10/04/02 2661 10/04/02 2661 10/04/02 1090 10/04/02 684 10/04/02 529 10/84/02 529 10/04/02 529 10/04/02 529 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 1104300 CHERYL STODDARD 5806449 SUNG~ PENTAMATION, INC 6104800 SUNGARD PENTAMATION, INC 6104800 SUNGA~ pE~A~TION, INC 6104800 SUNC4%RD PENTAMATION, INC 6104800 PAGE 9 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT CITATIONS AUGS002 0.00 1655.00 FYS002 AUGMENTATION 0.00 21758.66 AUG2002 FINGERPRINTS 0.00 144.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 634.16 FY 2002-2005 OPEN PURC 0.00 687.47 FY 2002-2009 OPEN PURC 0.00 645.96 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 369.86 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 681.72 DANCE 3/01/02 0.00 507.34 FY 2002-2003OPRN PURC 0.00 665.87 0.00 4214.98 #15060106 7/8-10/8/02 0.00 17.88 #19060106 7/8-10/8/02 0.00 63.03 #15060106 7/8-10/8/02 0.00 112.42 #15060106 7/8-10/6/02 0.00 12.89 #18060106 7/8-10/8/02 0.00 68.52 #18060106 7/8-10/8/02 0.00 18.14 0.00 292.28 Refund: Check - FALL. 0.00 O0 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 456.00 Refund: Check - Full r 0.O0 300.00 Refund: Check - FALL. 0.00 72.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 3178.00 N T LA W/E 9/15 0.00 840.00 N T LA W/E 9/22 0.00 819.00 0.00 1659.00 0.00 390.00 0.00 4125.00 0.00 14583.33 0.00 18708.33 RRSOL # 02-160 0.~0 800.00 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING lo/o3/o2 CITY OF CUPERTINO 4/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBUR~NTFUND transac=.~rans_date between "09/30/2002" and "10/04/2002" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND TOTAL CHECK ISSUE DT .............. %~NDOR ............. FUND/DEFT 10/04/02 690 SU~NYVAL~ FORD 6308840 1020 596484 10/04/02 M2003 1020 596495 10/04/02 2451 SUNNYVALe-CUPeRTINO 1101500 SURF CONTROL 6104800 1020 596486 10/04/02 2045 SVC~ 1020 596486 10/04/02 2045 SVC~ 1020 596486 10/04/02 2045 SVCN 1020 596486 10/04/02 2045 SVC~ 1020 596486 10/04/02 2045 SVCN 1020 596486 10/04/02 2045 SVCN TOTAL CHECK 1020 596487 10/04/02 695 1020 596487 10/04/02 695 1020 596487 10/04/02 695 1020 596487 10/04/02 695 1020 596487 10/04/02 695 1020 896487 10/04/02 695 i S96487 10/04/02 695 10~ 596487 10/04/02 695 1020 596487 10/04/02 695 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 596488 10/04/02 M 1020 596499 10/04/02 M 1020 596490 10/04/02 701 1020 596490 10/04/02 701 1020 596490 10/04/02 701 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596691 10/04/02 M2003 1020 596492 10/04/02 708 1020 596493 10/04/02 2781 1020 596494 10/04/02 724 1020 596495 10/04/02 310 1020 596496 10/04/02 750 1020 596497 10/04/02 2808 1- 596498 10/04/02 761 1104500 1104300 1104300 1104300 1104300 1104300 SYSCO FOOD SNEVICES OF S 5506549 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 1106500 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 1106500 Schlim, Alice 550 Snyder, Allen 550 TARGET STORES 5806349 TARGET STORES 5806349 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 0.00 27044.58 FY 2002-2003 OBER PURC 0.00 93.63 BAR ASSOC MTG 10/07 0,OD 28.00 S~RF CONTROL SOFTWAR~ 0.00 11076.24 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 92,50 FY 2002-2009 OPEN Pt~C 0.O0 45.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 42.50 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 85.00 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 47.50 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00 57.50 0,00 370.00 Refund: Check - Black 0.00 48.00 Refund: Check - Black 0,00 96.00 SUPPLIES 23019 0.00 47.58 SUPPLIES 25289 0.00 37.64 SUPPLIES 23020 0.00 40.01 0.00 125.23 RUN DATE 10/03/02 TI~ 11:35:52 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. PUND/DEPT ~0/04/02 760 10/0~/02 1937 10/04/02 794 10/0%/02 794 PAGE 11 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUEC O.00 248.40 0.00 307.41 MCQUILLIN LAW 0.00 939.61 SUPPLIES 16135 0.00 24.55 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUEC 0,00 369.05 FY 2002-2001 OPEN PURC 0.00 1273.02 0.00 1641.07 0.00 538119.59 0.00 538119.59 0.00 538119.59 RUE DATE 10/03/02 TIME 11:35:52 - FINA/~CIAL ACCOUNTING DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 02-186 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING OCTOBER 11, 2002 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the mounts and fi.om the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Dire~ctor of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st .day of October ,2002, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED: Mayor, City of Cupertino 10/10/02 CI~f OF C~ERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSE~NT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "10/07/2002" and "10/11/2002" ISSUE DT .............. 9~DOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 590960 V 02/08/02 M 1020 591005 V 02/05/02 M 1020 591040 V 02/15/02 M 1020 591061 V 02/15/02 M2002 1020 591085 V 02/15/02 586 1020 591150 V 02/15/02 887 1020 591178 V 02/15/02 962 1020 591305 V 03/01/02 M 1020 594506 V 07/19/02 M2603 1020 596322 V 09/27/02 M2003 1020 596502 10/11/02 1699 1020 596502 10/11/02 1695 1020 596502 10/11/02 1695 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596503 10/11/02 1505 1020 596504 10/11/02 2566 1020 596505 10/11/02 28 1020 596505 10/11/02 25 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596606 10/11/02 2296 1020 596506 10/11/02 2298 1020 896506 10/11/02 2298 1020 596506 10/11/02 2298 1020 996506 10/11/02 2295 1020 896906 10/11/02 2298 TOTAL CRECK 1020 596507 1020 596506 1020 596509 1020 996510 1020 596510 1020 596510 TOTAL CHECK PARK, KI-YOUNG 560 WEINGORD, SUSkN 560 CHIMOVITS, yAFIT 590 FOR~fM RF.NEWAL 1108408 MIC~L I~ 5606349 DIANE SNOW 5500000 10/11/02 864 10/11/02 M2003 10/11/02 100 10/11/02 2642 10/11/02 2542 10/11/02 2642 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT Refund: Check - WINTER 0.00 -77.00 Refund: Check - WIgglER 0.00 -119.00 Refund: Check - WIN~R 0.00 -48.00 RENEWAL FORUM/D.~%HAN 0.00 -5.00 M~IC SHOW W.W.WEEK 0.00 -135.00 O%rRPMT MIDORI 1/17 0.00 -78.00 BOOF~/F~ALS 0.00 166.43 RUE DATE 10/10/02 TIME 10:05:14 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING lO/lO/O2 CITY OF CUPERTINO CASH ACCT C}{ECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VEeR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION 1020 596511 10/11/02 M2003 C E E F 1101000 1020 596512 10/11/02 132 1020 596512 10/11/02 132 1020 696512 10/11/02 132 1020 596512 10/11/02 132 1020 596512 10/11/02 1~2 TOT;fL CHECK 1020 596514 10/11/02 143 1020 596515 10/11/02 144 1020 596515 10/11/02 144 1020 696615 10/11/02 144 1020 596515 10/11/02 144 1020 596515 10/11/02 144 1020 596516 10/11/02 149 1020 596516 10/11/02 149 1020 596616 10/11/02 149 1020 696616 10/11/02 149 1020 596516 10/11/02 149 1020 596516 10/11/02 149 1020 596516 10/11/02 149 1020 596816 10/11/02 149 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596517 1020 596518 1020 596518 TOTAL C~CK 1020 596519 1020 596521 1020 596522 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 1108508 CALIFORNIA WA~R SERVICE 1108314 10/5 G~ 2002/S.JA~S AUG2002 SERVICE AUG2002 SERVICE AUG2002 SERVICE AUG2002 SERVICE AUG2002 SERVICE C~H 1104300 C~ 1101201 C~H 1107302 CASH 1104510 C-~H 1104400 10/11/02 1156 C~ 110 10/11/02 ~T2003 C~RAVAD;%N & AARTI PAT 110 10/11/02 M (LHESLEY, KATE 560 10/11/02 M CHIMOVITS. YAPIT 580 10/11/02 192 C~C OCC~ATIONAL }~TH 5806449 10/11/02 916 COMPU~R XTRA~ XPRESS 6104500 pUBLICATIONS *FLEX HLTH/240125 *FLEX DEF/240125 0.00 135.00 0.00 6,51 0.00 26.04 0.00 5108,68 0.00 161.27 0.00 645.07 0.00 5947.57 0.00 103.84 0.00 306.50 0.00 410.34 0.00 3102,00 0.00 36.84 0.00 47.58 0.00 73.88 0.00 38.47 0.00 15.19 0.00 21.49 0.00 283.39 0.00 18.19 0.00 10.00 0.00 83.08 0.00 91.00 0.00 21.10 0.00 26.80 0.00 12.50 0.00 51.00 0.00 262.97 0,00 48.80 0.00 426.94 0.00 165.40 0.00 592.34 0.00 132,00 0,00 582,90 0,00 100.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 189.44 RUB DATE 10/10/02 TI~ 10:05:15 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING lQ20 596525 10/11/02 M2003 1020 596526 10/11/02 M2003 1020 596527 10/11/02 194 1020 596528 10/11/02 1034 1020 596529 10/11/02 209 1020 596530 10/11/02 210 1020 596931 10/11/02 211 1020 596931 10/11/02 211 1020 996531 10/11/02 211 1020 596531 10/11/02 211 TOT;iL CHECK 1020 596532 10/11/02 M 1020 596933 10/11/02 212 1020 596533 10/11/02 212 1020 596533 10/11/02 212 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596534 10/11/02 1242 1020 596535 10/11/02 M2003 1020 596536 10/11/02 223 1020 596537 10/11/02 1434 1020 596538 10/11/02 242 1020 596639 10/11/02 243 1020 996540 10/11/02 294 1020 596541 10/11/02 249 1020 596541 10/11/02 249 TOTAL CHECK 1028 596542 10/11/02 1949 1020 596543 10/11/02 253 1020 696544 10/11/02 260 1020 596544 10/11/02 260 1020 996544 18/11/02 268 CONTINO, JOE 6506549 CULINARY CF~ER 1106100 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 5606660 DAILY JOU~AL CORPORATIO 1101500 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108505 DEEP CLIFF ASSOCIATES L 5806449 DELTA DENTAL PL~OF CA 110 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CA 110 DELTA DENT;~ PLAN OF CA 110 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CA 110 DELVIN, GEACE 580 DEPARTNENT OF CONSERVATI 110 DEFARTMENT OF CONSERVATI 1100000 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATI 110 DIGITAL PRINT IMPRESSION 1104510 DISTRICT 12 QUOTA INT'L 1104510 DON & MIKE'S SWEEPING IN 2308004 EDWARD S. NALSH CO. 1108314 EVENT SERVICES 1106343 EXCHANGE LINEN SERVICE 5606680 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 110 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX SEISMIC FEES 7/1-9/30 SEISMIC FEES 7/1-9/30 SRISMIC FEES 7/1-9/30 EMPLOY~ APPS CONF 10/18 S.ABE FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC SUPPLIES 8590 SDI/776-5260-0 COUNCIL NTG 5/19 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC RENTAL 8/1-8/91/02 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC COURIER SERVICE COURIER SERVICE COURIER SERVICE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 3 AMOUNT 325.00 1250.00 184.96 715.00 545.00 6936.00 75.06 6460.56 3377.70 4176.48 14089.80 72.00 3033.20 RUN DATE 10/10/02 TIME 10:05:16 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 10/10/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO 1020 596544 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596945 1020 596546 1020 996947 1020 596547 TOTAL C~CK 1020 596549 1020 596550 1020 596558 10/11/02 1020 596559 10/11/02 1020 S96560 10/11/02 1020 596562 10/11/02 1020 S96562 10/11/02 1020 596562 10/11/02 1020 596562 10/11/02 1020 596562 10/11/02 1020 596562 10/11/02 1020 596562 10/11/02 1020 996562 10/11/02 1020 596562 10/11/02 1 596562 10/11/02 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 10/11/02 260 FSDERALEXPRESS CORP 4209223 10/11/02 1938 10/11/02 26B 10/11/02 274 10/11/02 274 10/11/02 277 10/11/02 M 10/11/02 281 10/11/02 2812 10/11/02 2812 ME2003 H~REE, TODD 1108201 M2003 F~L!NG SSR PARK 1100000 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108303 394 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108501 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... COURIER SERVICE CITY COUNCIL DINNER pARTS/SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 17410 SUPPLIES 17060 A~NUALBLNKT LICNS SEMINAR 11/8-11 ATWCOD CERTIFICATE FEE pARTS/SUPPLIES 8358 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8358 pARTS/SUPPLIES 8396 pARTS/SUPPLIES 8396 pARTS/SUPPLIES 24329 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8396 pARTS/SUPPLIES 8396 o.0o PA~ ~ AMOUNT 70.11 123.36 413.95 9.73 151.50 161.23 121.25 64.00 8.63 23290.00 29.95 1500.00 499.00 798.00 4000.00 4798.00 250.00 480.00 30.00 112.00 51.58 40.21 40.21 36.06 40.24 40.21 249.18 211.09 RUN DATE 10/10/02 TIME 10:05:16 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 10/10/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 5 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/03 CH~CK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_da0e between "10/07/2002" and "10/11/2002" CASH ACCT CRECK NO ISSUE DT .............. V~NDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 596562 10/11/02 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108503 1020 596562 10/11/02 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1106265 1020 596562 10/11/02 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108314 1020 596562 10/11/02 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108501 1020 596562 10/11/02 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108504 1020 596562 10/11/02 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108312 1020 596562 10/11/02 334 ROME DEPOT/GECF 1108503 1020 596562 10/11/02 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108312 1020 596562 10/11/02 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108407 1020 596562 10/11/02 334 ROME DEPOT/GECF 1108407 1020 596562 10/11/02 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 1108501 1020 596562 10/11/02 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 2708405 1020 596562 10/11/02 234 HOME DSPOT/GECF 1108408 1020 596562 10/11/02 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 2708404 1020 596562 10/11/82 834 NOM~ DEPOT/GECF 2708404 1020 596563 10/11/02 1888 AUTOMATIC RAIN CO. 1108407 1020 596563 10/11/02 1698 AUTOMATIC RAIN CO. 1108407 1020 596563 10/11/02 1898 AUTOMATIC RAIN CO. 1108407 TOTAL CRECK 1020 596564 10/11/02 M2003 I I M C 1104300 1020 596565 10/11/02 343 ICNA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 1020 596566 10/11/02 2090 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 1101500 1020 596567 10/11/02 2181 1020 596567 10/11/02 2181 TOTAL CHECK IMSA:INT'L MUNICIPAL SIG 1108602 IMSA:INT'L MUNICIPAL SIG 1108602 1020 596568 10/11/02 M2003 INS'T TRANSPORTATION ENG 1108601 1020 596569 10/11/02 353 IRON MOUNTAIN 1104300 1020 596570 10/11/02 M2003 JAYESH PARIKH 110 1020 596571 10/11/02 1412 JOBS AVAILABLR INC 1104510 1020 596572 10/11/02 M JORES, JOAN 580 1020 596579 10/11/02 M2003 KASTELIC, JEANNIS 5506549 1020 596574 10/11/02 1630 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INC 5806449 1020 596575 10/11/02 M KIM, KI SO0 580 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PARTS/SUPPLIES 8367 PARTS/SUPPLIES 23026 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8358 PARTS/SUPPLIES 6366 PARTS/SUPPLIES 8367 SUPPLIES 8353 PANTS SUPPLIES 24371 PANTS SUPPLIES 24318 PARTS 'SUPPLIES 24393 PARTS 'SUPPLIES 24392 PARTS 'SURPLIES 8367 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PUEC FY 2002-2003 OPEN pURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC G.JOENSON T~RU 12/31/0 SUPPLIES DUES M. VAN DE VEER DUES C. COREY FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC REPDMAINT FEE ADS 9/23-10/07/82 Refund: Check - FALL, ESL TREINING/DE ANZA Refund: Check - FALL p 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0o 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o. Qo 0.00 0.00 0.00 175,50 10,78 51.58 198.87 175.50 540.17 10.66 50.81 31.77 27.42 175.51 51.61 26.92 51.92 23.63 94,55 183.92 51.56 2696.86 90.00 6352.14 383.48 40.00 40.00 80.00 105.00 469.78 586.16 422.28 220.00 60.00 9086.00 273.00 RUN DATE 10/10/02 TIME 10:05:17 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING lO/lO/O2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/03 CA~E ACCT CHSCK NO 1020 596576 1020 596577 1020 596578 1020 596579 1020 596500 1020 596581 1020 596582 1020 596583 1020 596584 1020 596584 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596585 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FOND/DEPT 10/11/02 2805 LAUTZENHISER'S STATIONER 1104300 10/11/02 396 PHILLIP M LENI~AN 5806449 10/11/02 897 LESLIE'S POOL SUPPLIES I 1108503 10/11/02 M2003 LIE, TAN 110 10/11/02 M2003 LISA L. WANG 110 10/11/02 2734 C~LES LORET~A 5806249 10/11/02 M Letson, Janice 550 10/11/02 1968 MAZE AND ~SOCIATES 1104000 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... CUSTOM SEAL FOR CITY SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR PANTS/SUPPLIES 8413 RLS OF DEV MAINT FEE FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC Ref~tnd: Check - FALL. Refund: Check - Mind c Refund: Check - Going *NAT'L DEF SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC SALES TAX AMOUNT 0.00 547,96 0.00 52,50 0,00 472.30 0.00 684.40 0.00 698.70 0.00 143.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 27308.65 0.00 48.69 0.00 39.31 0.00 88.00 RUN DATE 10/10/02 TIME 10:05:17 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 10/10/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 7 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/03 CHECK RBGISTSE - DISBURSEMENT FLT~ SELECTION CRITERIA: transact,trans_date between "10/07/2002" and "10/11/2002" 1020 596598 10/11/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1107301 1020 596698 10/11/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108101 1020 596595 10/11/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1103500 1020 896598 10/11/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104510 1020 596598 10/11/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1104510 1020 596598 10/11/02 498 OFFICE DEPOT 1108601 1020 596598 10/11/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1107501 1020 596595 10/11/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1107405 TOTAL CHECK 1020 996599 10/11/02 501 OPERATING ENGINEERS #3 110 1020 596600 10/11/02 500 1020 596600 10/11/02 SOO 1020 596600 10/11/02 500 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596601 10/11/02 1020 596601 10/11/02 1020 596601 10/11/02 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596602 10/11/02 981 1020 596602 10/11/02 961 1020 596602 10/11/02 981 1020 596602 10/11/82 981 1020 596602 10/11/02 981 1020 596602 10/11/02 981 1020 596602 10/11/02 981 1020 596602 10/11/02 981 1020 896602 10/11/02 981 1020 696602 10/11/02 981 1020 596602 10/11/02 951 1020 596602 10/11/02 981 1020 896602 10/11/02 981 TOTltL CHECK 1020 596603 10/11/02 507 DAN OSBOR~ DBA:OSBORNE 4209216 1020 596604 10/11/02 833 P E R S 110 1020 596604 10/11/02 833 P E R S 110 1020 596604 10/11/02 833 P E R 5 110 1020 596604 10/11/02 833 P E R S 118 1020 596604 10/11/02 833 P E R S 110 1020 596604 10/11/02 833 P E R S 110 1020 596604 10/11/02 833 P E R S 110 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596608 10/11/02 2692 PACIFIC BELL 6104500 1108201 1020 596606 10/11/02 2692 PACIFIC BELL ..... DESCRIPTION ...... S2~S TAX AMOUNT OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 28.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 -47.60 EUPPLIES 0.00 43.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 10.81 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.O0 20.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 101.67 OFFICE SUPPLIEE 0.00 11.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 11.60 0.00 180.42 UNION DUES 0.00 601.02 B & W P.W. RET SPOU$;%L 0.00 3812.50 B & W P,W RETIREE 0.00 898.00 H & W P.W EMPLOYEEE 0.00 6286.00 0.00 10996.50 FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC ON-TINE DISCOENT PARTS SUPPLIES 8370 PARTS SUPPLIES 8399 PARTS SUPPLIES 8395 PBRS SPEC PERS EMPLY *FEES BYBK PERS BUYBE *PBRS BYBE PERS 1959 PERS EMPL¥ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 o.~o 0.0O 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9/20-10/19 SEPT 2002 148.03 254.66 964.72 121,15 25385.23 160.14 37.92 327.26 118.11 216.60 26366.03 92.01 2~2.79 REN DATE 10/10/02 TINE 10:05:18 - FINARCIAL ACCOUNTING 10/10/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO CASH ACCT C~ECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FLeD/DEFT 1020 596606 10/11/02 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108509 1020 596606 10/11/02 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 1020 596606 10/11/02 2892 PACIFIC BELL 1108508 1020 596606 10/11/02 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108507 1020 996606 10/11/02 2692 PACIFIC BELL 1108502 1020 596606 10/11/02 2692 PACIFIC BELL 9606640 1020 596606 10/11/02 2692 PACIFIC BELL 5506620 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 596609 10/11/02 811 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 911 PACIFIC 1020 996609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1~0 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 996609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 Sll PACIFIC 1020 '596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 595609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 896609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 911 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 696609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 911 PACIFIC 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 10,~20 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC 1104300 1103300 1103500 1104000 1104100 1104200 1104510 1106647 1104590 1104400 1106100 1101200 1106265 1101000 1106529 1106500 1107200 1107301 1107302 1107501 1107502 1107503 1108001 1108101 1108102 1106265 1108501 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 8 SEPT 2002 0.00 55.47 SEPT 2002 0.00 llS.B1 SEPT 2002 0.00 61.31 SEPT 2002 0.00 55.47 SEPT 2002 0.00 55.47 SEPT 2002 0.00 187.74 SEPT 2002 O.OO 162.79 0.00 945.85 TELEPHONE SERV AUG 200 TELEPHONE SSRV AUG 200 TELEPHONE SERV AUG 200 TELEPHONE SERV AUG 200 TELEFHON~ SERV AUG 200 TELEPHONE SERV AUG 200 TELEPHONE SERV AUG 200 TELEPHONE SERV AUG 200 0.00 275.46 0.00 61.69 0.00 92.53 0.00 92.S3 0.00 185.07 0.00 92,53 0.00 185.07 0.00 30,94 0.00 215,91 0.00 92,53 0.00 92,53 0.00 277.60 0.00 835.98 0.00 246.76 RUN DATE 10/10/02 TINE 10:05:19 - FINA/4CIALACCOUNTING 10/10/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 9 ACCOUNTINO PERIOD: 4/03 CHECK R~GISTRR - DISBURSEMENT FL~ND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "10/07/2002" and "10/11/2002" CASH ACCT CRECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC BELL/WOP-LDCOM 1107301 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC BELL/WOELDCOM 1108504 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM 1108511 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM 1106647 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC BELL/WOPJ~DCOM 1102100 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC BSLL/WOP-LDCOM 1101500 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC EELL/WORI/3COM 1108504 1020 596609 10/11/02 511 PACIFIC BELL/WOELDCOM 1108407 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596610 10/11/02 513 1020 596610 10/11/02 515 TOTAL CHECK PACIFIC G~ & ELEC~IC ( 1108602 PACIFIC GA~ & ELEC~IC ( 1108407 1020 596611 10/11/02 1494 pEI~ SAVER 5208003 1020 596611 10/11/02 1494 PEN~ SAVER 5208005 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596612 10/11/02 533 1020 596613 10/11/02 1929 1020 596614 10/11/02 1247 MARIE PRESTON 1106100 5806349 5806249 1020 596618 10/11/02 M2003 PJ%FT 1020 596616 10/11/02 2441 RSNEE P~EY 1020 596617 1020 596617 1020 596617 1020 596617 1020 596617 TOTAL C~ECK k020 596618 10/11/02 570 COLLEEN REGAN 5806449 10/11/02 578 COLLEEN REC~ 5806349 10/11/02 579 KEVIN REID 5606620 1020 596619 10/11/02 1071 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 2709431 1020 596620 1020 596620 TOTAL CHECK 10/11/02 600 10/11/02 600 ROTO-ROOTER SEWER SERVIC 2109612 ROTO-EOOTER SEWER SERVIC 5609105 1020 596621 10/11/02 602 ROYAL COACH TOURS 5506549 1020 596622 1020 596623 1020 596623 TOTAL CHECK 10/11/02 1230 SAFEURECKS 1104100 10/11/02 1230 SA/~ECHECKS 1104100 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX TELEPHONE SERV AUG 200 0.00 TELEPHONE SERV AUG 200 0.00 TELEPEONE SERV AUG 200 0.00 TELEPRONE SERV AUG 200 0.00 TELEPHONE SERV AUG 200 0.00 TELEPHONE SERV AUG 200 0.00 TELEPHONE SERV AUG 200 0.00 TELEPRONE SERV AUG 200 0.00 0.00 AMOUNT 61.69 123.98 61.69 277.60 154.22 339.29 30.89 14.64 9295.94 9/3-10/1 0.00 42.64 8/30-10/02 0.00 10.39 0.00 53.03 337.12 752.50 1089.62 PEEE LTC/#2405 0.00 159.24 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE F 0.00 6883.02 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 SERVICE AGEEFJ~ENT FOR 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o .,oo 0.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOB PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC REMOVE SUMP PUMP AND I TRANSPORTATION 9/26 Refund: Check - Mind c SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 436.41 436.41 130.90 87.37 436.41 1527.60 160.00 4632.50 540.00 5098.67 5638.67 663.01 40.00 532.11 532.11 1064.22 RUN DATE 10/10/02 TIME 10:05:20 io/io/oz ACCOUNTING PERIOD: TION CRITERIA: 4/03 transact.~rans_date between "10/07/2002" and "10/11/2002" FUND - 110 - GE~ERAJ~ FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 596624 10/11/02 621 SAN JOSE MERCURY CL~SIF 1104510 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 110840? 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SA~ JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108506 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP/~ 1108315 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 S~N JOSE WATER COMP~ 1108315 1020 596528 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 596626 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 10~ 596626 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 ] 596626 10/11/02 625 S~N JOSE WATER COMP~/~Y 1108407 I6~u 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1106506 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 S;~N JOSE WATER COMP;~ 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAATY 1108505 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMEAN~ 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~Ff 1108312 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 4209116 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~NY 1108312 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE ~ATER COMPANY 5606620 1020 596626 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606640 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~/~Y 1108303 1020 596626 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108408 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 596626 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMpAN~ 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 102 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1 596628 10/11/02 625 S~ JOSE WATER COMP~ 1106505 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX EMPLOYMENT ADS 0.00 956.26 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-8/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/28-9/27/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 6/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 6/28-9/27/02 0.00 8/28-9/27 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 7/31-10/01/02 0.00 7/31-10/01/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 O.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 5/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-8/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 6/22-9/23/02 0,00 8/22-9/23/02 O.pO 8/22-9/23/02 O.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 117.14 15.00 15.00 193.15 10.58 43.24 37.00 37.00 63.00 36.50 1339.93 149.29 2724.67 115.60 1865.64 RUN DATE 10/10/02 TIME 10:05:21 - FINANCIAL ACCOU~TTING 10/10/03 CITY OF C~/PERTINO PAGE 11 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/03 C~ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND tra~sact.trans_date between "10/07/2002" and "10/11/2002" C-ASR ACCT C~ECK NO ISSUE DT .............. %~ENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SA/{ JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 896628 10/11/02 628 SAN JOSE WATER COMP;~NY 1108407 1020 596625 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER CONPkNY 1108914 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP;%NY 8708510 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 996628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER CO~ 1108302 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108314 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMP~/f"f 1108314 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMEtarY 1108507 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108314 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108503 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAN~ 11083U3 1020 696628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1106303 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108303 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108407 1020 596628 10/11/02 625 SA~ JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 1020 896628 10/11/02 626 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 TOTAL CHECK 1020 996529 10/11/02 288 SAIgTA C~ACOLTNTY 110 1020 596630 10/11/02 M2003 SANTA CLA~ACOUN/~ 4209116 1020 596631 10/11/02 628 SANTA CLA~ COUN~"f SHERI 118 1020 596632 10/11/02 633 S~ACI~CO~ S}~ERI 1106248 1020 596633 10/11/02 2815 SANTA CLARA VA~J~Ey 1106647 1020 596634 10/11/02 2736 C3%ROL SATTERLES 5806249 1020 596635 10/11/02 M SHABROVA, YELENA 580 1020 596636 10/11/02 651 SIE~A PACIPIC~73RF SUPP 8606620 1020 596636 10/11/02 651 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPP 5606620 TOTAL CHECK 1020 596697 10/11/02 652 SIERRA SPRINGS WATER CO. 1101500 1020 596638 10/11/02 2383 SILICON V;tLLEY ANIMAL CO 1104530 1020 596639 10/11/02 2810 S~T & FINAL 5806345 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 36.59 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 49.88 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 39.92 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 39.92 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 111.78 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 188.16 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 62.36 8/22-9/23/02 8.00 758.32 8/28-9/27/02 0.00 9,00 8/28-9/27/02 0.00 9.00 8/28-9/27/02 0.00 1466.14 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 565,64 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 924.49 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 904.50 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 78.83 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 283.25 5/22-9/29/02 0.00 238.40 8/22-9/29/02 0.00 102.19 8/22-9/23/02 0,00 176.94 8/22-9/23/02 0,00 2527.29 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 730.08 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 860.6E 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 376.27 6/22-9/23/02 0.00 00 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 21b.80 8/22-9/23/02 0.00 202.70 0.00 40558.56 V ORTEGA 563312780 0.00 382.82 ENCRC~ PP, MT 0.00 1325,00 M MIGLIACCIO 556291952 0.00 SECURITY 9/21,22 0.00 SUPPLIES 23005 0.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00 Ref%hnd: Check - FALL. 0.00 4?3.94 2029.36 22.57 67.00 65.25 SUPPLIES 15909 0.00 223.58 SUPPLIES 15907 0.~0 413.84 0.00 637.42 EMPLOYEE WATER 0.00 6.85 2ND QTE FY2002/03 0.00 58814.66 SUPPLIES 17086 0.00 170.26 RUN DATE 10/10/02 TIME 10:05:21 10/10/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 4/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT F~ND FLTND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. V~NDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 896640 10/11/02 B87 1020 596641 10/11/02 665 1020 696642 10/11/02 2661 1020 596643 10/11/02 677 1020 596644 10/11/02 M 1020 896645 10/11/02 M 1020 596646 10/11/02 710 1020 596647 10/11/02 698 1020 596648 10/11/02 701 1020 596649 10/11/02 2807 1020 596680 10/11/02 1993 1~_~ 596651 10/11/02 1665 1020 596652 10/11/02 1154 1020 596653 10/11/02 2584 102O 596654 10/11/02 310 1020 596655 10/11/02 761 1020 596656 10/11/02 774 1020 596657 10/11/02 2761 1020 596658 10/11/02 M 1020 596689 10/11/02 962 1020 596659 10/11/02 962 TOTAL CHECK TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT ~E~ER OPi~DA COU 110 U.S. BANK TRUST N.A. 3105306 UNITED WAY OF SANTA CL4%R 110 PAGE 12 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT RUN DATE 10/10/02 TIME 10:05:22 RESOLUTION NUMBER 02-187 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR SALARIES AND WAGES PAID ON October 11, 2002 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services, or their designated representative has certified to the accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law; NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds set forth: GROSS PAYROLL $ 436,200.06 Less Employee Deductions $ ( 120,207.303 NET PAYROLL $ 315.992.76 Payroll check numbers issued 63054 through 63308 Void check number(s) CERTIFIED: ~~~. Director of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 2 ist day of October ,2002, by the following vote: Vote AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Members of the City Council APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino DRAF]' CUPE INO City Hall 10300 Tone Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX: (408) 777-3333 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Summary AGENDA ITEM ~ AGENDA DATE October 21, 2002 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Adoption of a Resolution Approving an Integrated Pest Management policy to guide pest control activities at ail city-maintained facilities. BACKGROUND The city's recently revised National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for storm water runoff requires that all permittees establish an integrated pest management (IPM) policy and develop and implement an IPM plan that requires a reduced-risk approach to all pest control activities performed at city facilities. Because the public, their pets, and local wildlife frequently visit City facilities and grounds, the city has assumed a risk-adverse position to avoid any unnecessary pesticide exposure for the public. The City currently follows established roles and procedures in the use of pesticides and city staffmembers who handle pesticides are current in training and certification required for such use. However, this permit requirement has resulted from the discovery that in the south Bay area, some traces of pesticides have been found in local creeks and in San Francisco Bay. These pesticide residues have been determined to be a potential threat to the environmental health of the Bay Area. In addition to environmental concerns, increasing evidence demonstrates that pesticide use can pose significant health risks to children and adults who are exposed to certain pesticides even when these chemical applications are used as described in the product directions. While it is believed that the majority of these pesticides enter creeks and the Bay via runoff from homes and gardens, governmental agencies are adopting IPM policies in accordance with NPDES guidelines to set examples and provide models for using the less-toxic pest management. strategies that agencies are asking the public to adopt through storm water permitting in development applications. Printed On Flocyclod Paper POLICY The policy as proposed would establish a formal requirement that all structural and landscape pest control activities performed at city-rna'retained facilities would consistently follow accepted IPM practices. While this has generally been the practice of the City in activities involving the use of pesticides, it is a stronger demonstration of the City's practices in this regard. As such, it will strengthen the city staff pest control procedures and be an even more specific reference in the enforcement of practices of pest control contractors that are under contract to the city. A copy of the policy is attached to this memorandum. FISCAL IMPACT AdoptiOn of this policy is not expected to have significant fiscal impacts, since the City now follows most of these practices. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adoption of Resolution No. 02- [ ~ ~ approving an Integrated Pest Management policy to guide pest control activities at all City-Maintained Facilities. Ralph A. Qualls, Jr. Director of Public Works Approved for Submission: David W. Knapp City Manager DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 02-188 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A POLICY REQUIRING AN INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT APPROACH TO PEST CONTROL AT ALL CITY-MAINTAINED FACILITIES WHEREAS, several pesticides have been found in local creeks and in San Francisco Bay and are understood to be a threat to the environmental health of the Bay Area; and WHEREAS, governmental agencies are adopting Integrated Pest Management OPM) policies to allow them to act as role models for using the less-toxic pest management strategies that agencies are asking the public to adopt; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino's recently revised National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (stormwater) permit requires that all permittees establish an IPM policy and develop and implement an IPM plan that requires a reduced-risk approach to all pest control activities performed at city facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cupertino, that a City policy regarding Integrated Pest Management shall be implemented as shown in the attached Exhibit. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21 st day of October 2002, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino ?-3 POLICY TO REQUIRE AN INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT APPROACH TO PEST CONTROL AT ALL CITY-MAINTAINED FACILITIES POLICY STATEMENT The City of Cupertino will carry out its pest management operations, at city-owned facilities, and at other facilities where the city is responsible to provide facility and landscape maintenance, using reduced-risk Integrated Pest Management ([PM) techniques. The city, recognizing that some pesticides may be potentially hazardous to human health and the environment, shall give preference to reasonably available non-pesticide alternatives, and reduced-risk pesticides, when performing pest control activities. Departments that apply pesticides will follow an [PM plan whose goal is to ensure the long-term prevention or suppression of pest problems, while reducing or eliminating the need for chemical pest controls (to the maximum extent feasible), with minimum negative impact on human health, non,target organisms, and the environment. The [PM Plan will include pest-specific and site-specific standard operating procedures (describing the [PM approach used to control common pest problems) and monthly pesticide use summaries. The city will prepare a report each year summarizing and evaluating the pest control activities performed by city staff and contractors. The IPM Plan will also include an outreach component to residential and commercial pesticide users, and mechanisms to discourage pesticide use at new development sites. No products containing Clopyralid, Diazinon, Chlorpyrifos (Dursban), Chloradane, DDT, Dieldrin or other organophosphates can be used by city staff or a city contractor on city property or property maintained by the city. Currently, these chemicals are not in use at city-maintained facilities. City staff are to report pest control problems to the Public Works Facilities Supervisor or to the Recreation Supervisor at Blackberry Farm. No unauthorized city staff can purchase pesticides for use at work. O City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue ~ Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 C U PERJINO 7-3 33 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM Summary AGENDA DATE October 21, 2002 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Adopt a resolution accepting a grant of easement for trail purposes from San Jose Water Company for the San Tomas Aquino - Saratoga Creek Trail. BACKGROUND Construction of the San Tomas Aquino - Saratoga Creek Trail Project commenced in Summer 2002. Work on a segment of the trail that crosses San Jose Water Company land to connect Sterling Boulevard to the pedestrian bridge over Saratoga Creek has proceeded thus far under the provisions of a temporary access agreement between Cupertino and the San Jose Water Company. Negotiations for a permanent grant of easement over the 18-foot-wide strip of land involved were related to the water company filing of a final subdivision map for the property. The approved tentative map includes a provision for the strip of land to be dedicated in fee to the City. Until such time that the final subdivision map has been recorded which will effectively dedicate the trail property to the City, the trail will be completed and put into use through the instrument of the grant of easement, the acceptance of which is recommended to the Council. FISCAL IMPACT There is no financial impact. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Cupertino City Council adopt Resolution No. 02- ~ ~r], accepting a grant of easement for trail purposes fi.om San Jose Water Company. Submitted by: Ralph A. Quails, Jr. Director of Public Works Approved for submission to the City Council: David W. Knapp City Manager DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 02-189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR TRAIL PURPOSES FROM SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY, STERLING BOULEVARD, APN 375-23-038 WHEREAS, San Jose Water Company has executed a Grant of Easemem for Trail Purposes which is in good and sufficient form, granting to the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, easement over a portion of certain real property for the San Tomas Aquino-Saratoga Creek Trail purposes, situate in the City of Cupertino, more particularly shown in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, which is as follows: An 18-foot-wide strip for trail access over that certain real property situate in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, located at Sterling Boulevard, APN 375-23-038. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Cupertino accept said grant so tendered; and IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to record said grant and this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21 st day of October 2002, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR TRAIL EASEMENT EXHIBIT A For maximum effectiveness and for grant eligibility all lamps in a traffic signal would be required to be LED devices. The funding in the CIP would provide for the lamp conversion and for the matching funds for the battery backup system grant. In June 2002, the City applied for a grant fi.om the State of California Energy Commission, to procure battery backup systems at 25 major intersections. Recently, the City was advised that a grant had been approved in the amount of $37,352.00 on condition of acceptance by the City and the approval of the local matching funds of $29,348.00 (44%) for a total project cost of $66,700.00. As noted above the matching funds are available in the adopted 2002-2003 CIP in the Yellow & Pedestrian Head LED Traffic Signal Upgrades project, account number 420-9547. FISCAL IMPACT As the fimding for the matching funds to the grant is included in the adopted 2002-2003 CIP, there is no additional financial impact. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adoption of Resolution No. 02- I ~ ~) _, authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with the State of California Energy Commission for a grant of $37,352.00 and for the City to provide matching funds of $29,348.00, for a total project of $66,700.00 to purchase and install battery backup systems at 25 major intersections. Submitted by: Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 02-190 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A MATCHING SHARE GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION FOR A GRANT IN THE AMOUNT $37,352.00 AND FOR THE CITY TO PROVIDE $29,348.00 IN MATCHING FUNDS TO PROVIDE FOR BATTERY BACK UP SYSTEMS AT 25 MAJOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOCATIONS WITHIN THE CITY FOR A TOTAL PROJECT OF $66,700.00 WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 25403.8, the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) is authorized to provide grants to city, county or city and county governments for battery back up systems for traffic signals. WHEREAS, in order to be eligible for funding, the battery backup systems must be used in conjunction with light emitting diode (LED) traffic signals. WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino desires to enter into a matching share Grant Agreement with the California Energy Commission for a grant in the mount $37,352.00, and for the City to provide $29,348.00 in matching funds, for a total project of $66,700.00, to provide for battery back up systems at 25 major traffic signal locations within the city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby authorizes the City Manager to negotiate and execute a matching share Grant Agreement with the State of California Energy Commission on behalf of the City of Cupertino. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of October 2002, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CRISTO REY STARLING HOMESTEAD w>' ~ PRUNERIDGE < ~ x VALLCO PKWY CREEK LAZA qEO 0 RODRIGUES FALLENLEAF BOLLINGER CIb/Owns 510na15~ 37 C~t;y Ma,n~am5 from 5f;af~ I0 (I July Cl~ Mal~ns from 5~ G (27 July ~un~ Transf~r~ ~h~p ~ C~ T~I Mam~,n~ ~ C~: 54 Prop~ 5 ~ , RAINBOW PROSPECT INTERSECTION NUMBER MAP CITY OF CUPERTINO SCALE: I' = 240(7 PIROPODED INTERBCTION5 FOR BATTERY BACKUP SYSTEM5 ' CITYOF CUPE iNO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3213 FAX: (408) 777-3109 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCES SUMMARY Agenda Item No. [ ~) Meeting Date: October 21, 2002 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Grant a 5% salary adjustment to the City Manager for performance from July 10, 2001 through July 9, 2002, Resolution No. D~-l~ I. BACKGROUND On October 15, 2002 in closed session, the City Council granted a 5% salary adjustment to the City Manager for his performance from July 10, 2001 through July 9, 2002. The salary adjustment will be effective July 15, 2002. FISCAL IMPACT The 5% City Manager salary adjustment equates to an annual cost of $8,604.72. Submitted by: Sandy Abe Human Resources Manager Approved for submission: Dav~ W.~app City Manager Printed on Recycied Paper RESOLUTION NO. 02-191 DRAFT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO GRANTING A 5% CITY MANAGER SALARY ADJUSTMENT FOR PERFORMANCE FROM JULY 10, 2001 THROUGH JULY 9, 2002. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to grant a 5% salmy adjustment to the City Manager for his performance from July I0, 2001 through July 9, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Manager's salary be adjusted by 5% effective July 15, 2002. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of October 2002 by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF CUPEP INO AGENDA NO. II 10300 T0rre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department SUMMARY AGENDA DATE October 21, 2002 SUMMARY: Extend Interim Ordinance No. 1902 regarding Randy Lane and Larry Way (Linwood Acres) to January 31, 2003: "An Interim Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Adopting Interim Measures to Immediately Rezone Approximately 19 Acres, Consisting of Sixty-Eight Single-Family Residences, from A1-43 Agricultural-Residential Zone and the R1-7.5 Single Family Residence Zone to the P(A1) Planned Development Zone with Agricultural- Residential Intent and Declaring the Urgency Thereof." RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends extending the interim ordinance until January 31, 2003. The City Council's options are: 1. Extend Ordinance No. 1902 to January 31, 2003; 2. Extend Ordinance No. 1902 for a different amount of time; or 3. Take no action, allowing the interim ordinance to expire on October 31, 2002. DISCUSSION: Planning Commission: The Planning Commission supported the neighborhood recommendation to extend the interim ordinance for three months. Public: Mr~ Geoffrey Paulsen, resident at 10557 Randy Lane, was present at the Planning Commission meeting as a representative of the study group and submitted a petition signed by ten residents in the neighborhood supporting the staff recommendation. There were no other speakers for this item. Staff: Staff believes that more than three months will be necessary to develop and enact new regulations for the neighborhood. However, State Law allows for two extensions to an interim ordinance, so if the additional time is needed, a second extension can be made. Z-2002-03: Extension of Interim Ordinance If the City Council does not take action on this item, the interim ordinance will expire on October 31, 2002 and the zoning designation of 67 of the 68 properties will return to the A1-43 Agricultural-Residential designation and the remaining property will return to the R1-7.5 Single-Family Residential designation. Prepared by: Peter Gilli, Associate Planner Director of Community Development Approved by: David W. Knapp City Manager Enclosures: Planning Commission Staff Report and enclosures, October 14, 2002 Peri, on CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: Z-2002-03 Agenda Date: October 14, 2002 Applicant: City of Cupertino Property Location: Randy Lane and Larry Way between Lucille Avenue and Men'itt Drive. Application Summary: Consideration of an extension of an urgency ordinance to rezone approximately 19 acres, consisting of 68 single-family residences from A1-43 Agricultural- Residential Zone and R1-7.5 Single Family Residence Zone to the P(A1) Planned Development Zone with Agricultural-Residential Intent. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1. Recommend approval of an extension of Ordinance No. 1902 to January 31, 2003. BACKGROUND: On September 16, 2002, the City Council enacted an interim ordinance to rezone 68 single-family residences to a P(A1) Planned Development Zone with Agricultural-Residential Intent. On October 2, 2002, a neighborhood meeting was held at the Cupertino Library Community Room. Approximately 50 residents attended the meeting. A study group was created to look into the benefits and drawbacks of alternative regulations. The study group will tentatively meet weekly on Wednesday nights at a location to be determined. DISCUSSION: The purpose of the interim ordinance was to protect the area from increased development while the neighborhood considers alternative regulations that could be adopted permanently. By State Law, an interim ordinance is initially in force for only 45 days. The City Council may extend the ordinance for up to a total of one year. Unless extended, the interim ordinance will expire on October 31, 2002. Staff believes that it will take six months for the neighborhood to reach consensus on new regulations, if any are needed (see Exhibit C). However, during a meeting with the neighborhood study group on October 9, 2002, there was general concern from the residents over extending the interim ordinance without having a good understanding of what the enforcement of the interim regulations would result in. The consensus of the group was to request that the Z-2002-03: Extension of Interim Ordinance 2 interim ordinance be extended, but only for a period of three months. The three- month extension will allow staff and the group more time to comprehend the nuances of the interim regulations. If more time is need, a second extension may be granted, according to State law. Staff believes the group's request is the most appropriate action at this time. If the neighborhood requests new regulations as a result of continuing meetings, it is projected that the Planning Commission will hear the item in February or . March of 2003. Enclosures: Exhibit A - Ordinance No. 1902 Exhibit B - Legal Description Exhibit C - Timelines Three letters received from residents on October 4, 2002 Submitted by: Peter Gilli, Associate Planner Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developmen~-~ EXHIBIT A DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 1902 AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ADOPTING INTERIM MEASURES TO IMMEDIATELY REZONE APPROXIMATELY 19 ACRES, CONSISTING OF SIXTY-EIGHT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES, FROM A 1-43 AGRICULTURAL-RESIDENTIAL ZONE AND THE R1-7.5 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE TO THE P(A1) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE WITH AGRICULTURAL-RESIDENTIAL INTENT AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN the following: Chapters: 1. Findings 2. Purpose 3. Definitions 4. Regulations 5. Appeal 6. Euforcement 7. Pipeline 8. Expiration CHAPTER I. Findings. In order to protect the public safety, health and welfare, this ordinance is adopted as an urgency interim ordinance pursuant to Government Code section 65858. It is important to safeguard the uniqueness of sixty-eight single-family residences on Randy Lane and Larry Way between Lucille Avenue and Men'iR Drive, herein referred to as the "Neighborhood." The "Neighborhood" is predominantly comprised of single-story homes on large lots, preserving privacy between homes. New development that is out of scale and incompatible with the existing neighborhood is detrimental to the welfare of the "Neighborhood," and inconsistent with Policy 2-15 of the Cupertino General Plan. There is at least one pending application for a building permit to do a major addition, including a second story, which will be approved unless this interim ordinance is adopted. It is therefore determined, by the City Council, that this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption pursuant to Government Code sections 36394 and 36937. This ordinance will remain effective for forty-five days after adoption unless extended pursuant, to Government Code section 65858(a). Ordinance No. 1902 CHAPTER 2. Pumose. The purpose of this ordinance is to protect the aesthetic character of the "Neighborhood" and the privacy of its residents, while the City works with "Neighborhood" residents to determine the appropriate design regulations that will be incorporated into a permanent ordinance. CHAPTER 3. Definitions "Addition" means any construction that increases the size of a building or facility in terms of site coverage, height, length, width or gross floor area. CHAPTER 4. Re~,ulations The regulations for this Planned Development zone are as follows: 1. New construction and additions shall be developed in accordance with the site development and design standards specified in Section 19.20.060 in the A1 Agricultural-Residential ordinance, or Sections 19.28.060 through 19.28.130 in the RI Single Family Residential ordinance, whichever specific regulation is more restrictive. 2. Requests for new construction shall be made to the Design Review Committee for design approval to allow for the development, subject to Chapter 19.28.080, 19.28.090 and 19.28.110 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, except that all additions must receive a special permit. CHAPTER 5. AvDeal All determinations and decisions by the Design Review Committee under this Chapter are subject to appeal to the Planning Commission under the procedures described in Section 19.136 of this title. CHAPTER 6. Enforcement I. Any person who violates any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished as provided in Chapter 1.12 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 2. The City Attorney may maintain an action for injunctive relief to restrain a violation or cause, where possible, the complete removal of any addition constructed in violation of this chapter. CHAPTER 7. Pipeline Applications for building permits filed prior to September 16, 2002 may be processed under the former zoning regulations in the A143 zoning district subject to approval by the Director of Community Development. CHAPTER 8. Exniration This ordinance shall automatically expire upon the effective date of a permanent ordinance or 45 days from the date of enactment of this ordinance, whichever comes first unless pursuant to Government Code 65858. Ordinancc No. i9O2 INTRODUCED and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 16t~ day of September, 2002, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Lowenthal, Chang, james, Kwok, Sandoval None None None ATTEST: APPROVED: Mayor, City of Cupertino EXHIBIT B ~m Legal Description Lucille Avenue C/L tmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmma m_ · · -- · · .._,, · · · mmmmmmmmmmmm · mm--Im~J ~' 316 02 00~ 10741 la~ry Way 316 02 006 10727 La~-y Way 316 02 007 10713 La~y Way 31602008 10699 Lalxy Way 316 02 009 1068~ Lar~ Way 316 02 010 10671 Lax'ty Way 316 02 011 106~? La~y Way 316 (Y2 012 10643 Lar~ Way 316 02 013 10629 Larry Way 316 02 014 10615 Larry Way 31602015 10601 La~] Way 316 02 016 10~87 La~f Way 316 02 017 10571 Larry Way 51602018 10557 Larry Way 316 02 019 10541 La~y Way 316 02 020 10325 Larry Way 31602021 10311 Lan~ Way 316 02 023 10510 Lar~ Way 316 02 024 1032~ Larry Way 316 02 025 10~40 Lan~ Way 316 02 026 10~6 La~y Way 316 02 027 10570 Larry Way 31602028 10~86 Lat~ Way 31602029 10600 La~y Way 316020'30 10618 Larry Way 316 02 031 10628 Larry Way 31602032 10642 La~y Way 316 02 0~3 106~6 L~ Way 31602034 10670 Lar~ Way 316 02 035 10684 Lar~ Way 316 02 036 10698 La~y Way 31602037 10712 Lar~y Way 31602038 10726 Larry Way 316 02 039 10740 Lar~ Way 316 02 040 10741 Randy Ln 31602041 10727 Randy lm 316 02 042 10713 Randy Ln 31602043 10699 Randy Ln 316 02 044 1068~ Randy Ln 316 02 045 10671 Randy Ln 31602046 106~? Randy Lan 316 02 073 10740 Randy Ln Assessor's Parcel Number EXHIBIT C ~ Interim Ordinance Timeline Sept0= I octo= I .cvo= I Dec02 I Ja. 03 I Feb03 I Mar03 I Apr0~ I Purpose: prevent an increased amount of new development while ~e neighborhood reviews i~ regulations Neighborhood Review of Regulations (estimated timeline) I InitialMeeting ~ Sep"~'~~02 ,, NOV02 I Dec02, Jan03 Study Group meetings ' Feb 03 Mar 03 Apr 03 Purpose: allow the neighborhood to review its development regulations and determine if changes should be made * Expect meetings to be affected by the holiday season. A letter to the Cupertino Community Development Department I'm strongly against house planning commission to impose more restriction to our neighborhood where is AR zone. 1) The letter has a strong bias against current zoning rule without a fair comparison of R1 and Al. The letter did not give a specific value but only use relative name tike 'high' & 'low'. The letter makes resident think that the current rule is terrible to live with. But most of us enjoy this neighborhood. 2) Further restriction ofthe building regulation will only depress this neighborhood market value. Which is real bad at the current real estate market. 3) The further restriction is not fair to the owners who have not yet remodel/rebuild their house. 4) The neighborhood was build around 1951, a lot of insurance company also rejecting insure these houses. That means the some of house in this neighborhood already too old that need to be rebuilt or remodeled from the structure/market point of view. 5) We like the new house o.r new remodel house in this neighborhood. These houses make this neighborhood looks cleaner and neat, and certainly, increase the whole neighborhood image. We do not feel the pressure by these houses but enjoy while walking around the neighborhood. 6) Planning commission should have some rumors clear. Such like a) 'if change to RI zone, the owner will have to pay for the sidewalk construction fee'. b) 'if change to R1 zone, the property tax will increase.' c) 'if you want to change to R1 zone, you can go ask city to change yourself.' 7) I have no objection if city want to change this neighborhood to R1 zoning. That way we have nothing to say that city is bias on either side. Brian Kuo 10540 Larry Way, Cupertino, CA 95014 RECEIVED OCT 0 4 ZOOZ BY: letter to the Cupertino Community Development Deparb.ent I am strongly against Cit Council to impose more restriction to our Randy Lane and Larry Way Neighborhood. 1) Randy Lane and Larry Way Neighborhood is already zoned A1-43 Agricultural-Residential and R1-7.5 Single Residential, which is greatly different than other area. That further restriction will only depress this neighborhood market value, which is also unfair to the owners who have not yet remodel/rebuild their houses. 2) The Community Development Department should take the fact that more young families are moving into this neighborhood into consideration, therefore, our houses must to be remodeled/rebuilt to accommodate our children's needs of living in a cleaner and neat environment. /(,0='7 RECEIVED BY: A letter to the Cupertino Community Development Department I am strongly against City Council to impose regulations to our Randy Lane and Larry Way Neighborhood when receiving building permits for remodel/rebuild our houses. 1) Both Randy Lane and Larry Way are located near Apple Computer, Ine, a worldly recognized high-teeh corporation, of which provisions under A1-43 Agricultural- Residential seems inconsistent of buildings of Apple Computer. For buildings on Infinite Loops are neat and tall in height, buildings on Randy Land and Larry Way Neighborhood are rather plain and ordinary, altogether creating a sharp contrast. Therefore, owners of houses on Randy Lane and Larry Way Neighborhood should reserve the right to remodel/rebuild their houses to balance this area of Cupertino neighborhood image. 2) Randy Lane and Larry Way Neighborhood is already zoned A1-43 Agricultural- Residential and R1-7.5 Single Residential, which is greatly differem than other area. That further restriction will only depress this neighborhood market value, which is also unfair to the owners who have not yet remodel/rebuild their houses. 3) The Comity Development Department should take the fact that more young families are moving into this neighborhood into consideration, therefore, our houses must to be remodeled/rebuilt to accommodate our children's needs of living in a cleaner and neat environment. Steve Liang-Kwan Chen 10601 Larry Way, Cupertino, CA 95014 RECEIVED OCT 0 4 2002 BY: PETITION )ate: October 14, 2002 To: Cupertino Planning Commission Members of the Linwood Acres Study Group Subject: Application No: Z-2002-03 (Urgency ordinance) We, the undersigned members of the Linwood Acres Study Group petition the Cupertino Planning Commission to recommend that the urgency zoning ordinance (set to expire on October 31, 202) be extended until January 31, 2003 - no earlier and no later. We met on October 9, 2002 and unanimously agreed that a three month extension would give us enough time to fully understand the ramifications of any further extension, but it would not extend the urgency ordinance so long that it would adversely impact those residents of Linwood Acres who desire to move ahead with projects. d.'~ ./] Name Address Date 6. ~~_~_.._ __ ~_ _~-_~_-,-a _~ ..... J_~_ _~_ _ ~ _~_~_~a ...... _c_~_, _~_ _~_ .... ........... .... ..... .......... 8. flj._d_~/d_~_~_~_~,z-_~_b~_;_~_ ............. 9. _~"Z'~~-:-_P_~.~ _ZoT_Z$ ~.,q~ ~_.~.,,w*,__c_~_:_~°~-~''''° ./_"j~¥' ~ o.~_ _ ~- -"-- ............................... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_~.~, ~,~, ~.t .... ,;;~,.~./~ .... 12. 13. 15. 16. ' 17. ,;- 18. 20. 21. 22. CITY OF CUPERTINO AGENDA NO. 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 . (408) 777-3308 FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department SUMMARY AGENDA DATE October 21/2002 SUMMARY: Deny appeal of DIR-2002-27 for a temporary use permit issued by the Director of Community Development for a temporary sales trailer, The O'Brien Group, 21151 Canyon Oak Way, APN 342-59-007. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends denying the appeal and upholding the Director's decision. The City Council's options are: 1. Deny the appeal and uphold the Director's decision, or 2. Grant the appeal and deny or modify the Director's decision. BACKGROUND: The Director of Community Development approved locating a temporary sales trailer on the above lot in the Oak Valley development. Please refer to the enclosed staff reports and site plan. The Director's approval was appealed to the Planning Commission, which held a public hearing on September 23, 2002. The Municipal Code requires that appeals be heard by the Planning Commission with a recommendation to the City Council. The Planning Commission recommends denying the appeal (5-0) and upholding the Director's decision. DISCUSSION: Planning Commission: The Commissioners felt that a temporary sales trailer is a reasonable expectation for a new development. Since it is temporary and only open three days a week, it should not be a problem. There already are traffic calming measures on the street to address traffic concerns. Appellant: Mr. Hocker, the appellant, reiterated concerns about traffic, and his view that the trailer could be located elsewhere. He presented a petition of homeowners in the neighborhood who oppose the sales trailer. O'Brien Group: E1issa Morrash, the O'Brien Group representative, stated that the sales trailer will be open three days a week, from 10 A.M. to 5 P.M. Sales visits will be largely by appointment. There is no model home. Staff: Other locations for the sales trailer Were not considered, since any other location would affect another group of residents. In addition, no significant impacts were identified as part of this location. Prepared by: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner Submi ed by: Director of Community Development Approved by: David W. Knapp City Manager Enclosures: Planning Commission Staff Report and enclosures, September 23, 2002 Petition Against Use Permit G:planning~/pdreport/cc/ccDIR-202-27 ~CIT¥ OF CUPER'I'II'~O 10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: DIR-2002-27 Agenda Date: September 23, 2002 Applicant: The O'Brien Group Owner: The O'Brien Group Location: 21151 Canyon Oak Way, APN 342-59-007 Application Summary: Appeal of an approved temporary use permit issued by the Director for a temporary sales trailer. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council either: 1. Deny the appeal and uphold the Director's decision, or 2. Grant the appeal and deny or modify the Director's decision DISCUSSION: On August 13, 2002, the Director of Community Development approved locating a temporary sales trailer on the above lot in the Oak Valley development. Please refer to the enclosed staff report and site plans. Mr. Keith Hocker, 21150 Canyon Oak Way, appealed the decision to the Planning Commission. The enclosed letter explains his reasons for the appeal. Staff's response to some of his concerns are: Increased traffic: Staff does not believe that traffic from the sales trailer will create traffic problems. The Oak Valley development has had several sales office locations within the existing residential areas in the past. At that time, many more lots were for sale, so neighborhood traffic would have been greater then than now. Currently there are three homes remaining to be sold by the O'Brien Group. Staff is not aware of any traffic impacts created by the sales offices. Private Open Space: Staff is not concerned that a temporary sales trailer jeopardizes the private open space designation, since the trailer will be removed in six months. Grading: The O'Brien Group's representative states that the grading is related to the home under construction, and that no grading was done to accommodate the sales trailer. Enclosures: Photographs Director's Approval Site Plan (2 pages) Applicant's letter, August 21, 2002 O'Brien Group Memorandum, September 16, 2002 Submitted by: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developme~.~ G:planning/pdreport/pc/DIR-2002-27appeal 2 Location of proposed sales trailer View of street 3 To: From: Date: Subject: CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308 Mayor and City Council members Chairman and Planning Commissioners Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development August 13, 2002 Director's Approval of a temporary use permit for a sales trailer on an existing lot at the Oak Valley development located at 21151 Canyon Oak Way. Chapter 19.132 of the Cupertino Municipal Code allows for administrative approval of minor changes in a project. The Director reports his decision to the City Council and Planning Commission in time to allow an appeal of the decision within fourteen calendar days. ACTION: The Director approves the temporary sales trailer. The temporary use permit will expire six months from the effective date of approval. DISCUSSION: The O'Brien Group, developer 6f the Oak Valley subdivision, has received temporary use permits in the past for locating its sales offices near the active areas of development. The development is nearly complete, and a sales trailer is proposed near the final area of development, lot 2-07 on Canyon Oak Way. Staff has no problem with the approval. The adjacent neighbors will be notified of the approval. Enclosure: Plan Set G: \ Planning \ PDREPORT \ Dinninraod \ DIR-2002-2 7 08/08/2002 ~ 08:29 F..L~ ~001/002 TO FOOTHILL BOJIZVA~O DiR £ CTOR, S//A ~o RO/VA~ DATE: ~/ ~' .~ '°c' SIGNATURE: / ~ COMMUNITY DEV. DIR. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE PUBLIC C ~PACE LOS ALTOS RG.&E. PARK z.oclc~-.r i D N CATE OF HEAVEN CEMETERY DiRECTO~'$./~PP~OV_AL DAT~: ,~/<~$/~ ~ ~, SIGNATURE~. ~ ~OMMUNIT¥ R. THE O'ERIEN GROUP OAK VALLEY August 21,200 Z CiddyWordell Project Manager 10300 To~eAve Cupe~ino, Ca. 95014 Dear Ciddy; We received a letter fi:om the City of Cupertino, dated August 13, 2002, advising us that a Temporary . Sales Office Trailer for The O'Brien Group, will be erected on lot 2-07, 21151 Canyon Oak Way, within the Oak Valley Development Project. As this event has caught us completely by surprise, with no discussion flrom The O'Bfien Group, we'd like to inform you of several concerns we have about this situation. 1. A Sales Trailer situated on this lot will bring increased traffic and congestion into an already crowed environment, as the adjacent lot, 2-09, is also under construction. The Trailer would be situated across the street fi:om the Children's Public Park, combined with the large amount of construction traffic, residents who consistently speed along this stretch of road and the proposed trailer parking spaces near the road, will all contribute to create a very unsafe situation. 2. The proposed Trailer will partially sit on a piece of land, as per the diagram we received in the mailing that is considered Private Open Space. The CC&R's for the Development clearly state, that no structure, temporary or otherwise can exist on Private Open Space land. 3. There appears to have been some suspicious grading of the lot to increase the overall build able lot size to accommodate the size of the house structure, nearly 5,000 square feet, and we believe, to also accommodate the Sales Trailer. This was done by pushing soil into the Private Open Space and increasing the fiat area of the lot by approximately 6-8 feet to one side. 4. In addition to the construction of the houses, there will be construction, maintenance, and subsequent dismantling of the Trailer, and associated parking structure and landscaping, adding to an already noisy and congested area. We would like to explore two solutions 1. Locate the Sales Trailer on one of the city owned lots, 2-02. Tiffs is a large, unused lot, next to the house, lot 2-01, that used to be one of the Sales Offices. There is driveway access, and a large fiat area for both trailer and parking. 2. Keep the Sales Trailer on the Emergency Access Road offof Cristo Rey Dr, where the current Construction Office Trailer sits. Since this relocation proposal is temporary, this make the best sense and least work for all those involved. Please advise us if we should continue with filing a formal Appeal to this decision, or if we can resolve the situation with other means. Thank You K~thHocker 21150 Canyon Oak Way Cupertino, Ca. 95014 650-254-1333 O'BRIEN GROUP BY: I MEMORANDUM To: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner, City of Cupertino Planning Department 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014 From: Elissa Morrash, Marketing Director, The O'Brien Group Date: September 16, 2002 Re: Planing Commission Hearing on September 23 - Temporary use pemit for sales trailer on an existing lot at Oak Valley, 22151 Canyon Oak Way I am requesting that this information be distributed to the Planning Commission as relevant to the appeal of a sales trailer at Oak Valley: Please see attached excerpt from the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of Oak Valley (CC&R's), VI. Development Rights, 6.4 Marketing, in which The O'Brien Group is accorded the right to maintain a sales trailer on any Lot owned or controlled by the Declarant. W ~.:~' I~ECORDED RE'TU'R,Xl TO: ~ O'Bri~a Group 2001 W'mward Way, Suin* 200 Sa~ M~*o, CA DECLARATION OF COVENANTS CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS OF OAK VALLEY L. ~'LI/,t, SAPUTO V 3.3.6 3.3.? Archke,'tuz~l Design Comraiu~ ............................. 6 Addklcnal E, uements ..................................... 6 USES AND KESTRICTIONS ......................................... 4.2 `*.3 ? ALTEIC&TIONS ............................................ ? ANTENNAS AND SATELLITE DISHES ............................ 7 CAL~OR.N'LA RED-LEGGED FROG .............................. 7 ,*.4 COUNTY P.~KK LANDS ...................................... 7 `*.5DRAINAGE ............... ." ............................... 7 `*.6FENCES A.N~D GATES ......................................... 8 `*.7I ,.N~'ITEF. S ................................................ 8 4.8 LINEAR P.M~KS ............................................ 8 `*.9NLMLBOXES .............................................. 8 4.10MINER.-~L EXPLORATION ..................................... 8 4.11NUISANCES .............................................. 8 `*. 1:2 OUTDOOR LIGI-IT~G ....................................... 8 4 13' PARIC~G 8 · :::: ........ : ....................... 4 14PRIVATE · 4.14.1 On Lots Which. Adjoin Public Open Space ...................... 9 4.14.2 On .-MI Lots ............ ............................... 9 4.15 KEN~i".~ OF I~ ~gI~ENCES .................... :: ....... - ........ 9 4.16 SIGNS ................................................... 9 ~.. 17 SLN'GLE STORY AND SPLIT-LEVEL RESIDENCES ................... i0 4.18 SPORTS EQL"[PN~NT ........... · ............................ 10 `*. 19 STORAGE OF WASTE ,MATERIALS .............. ; .............. I0 `*,20 USE AND OCCL~PA~%'CY OF LOTS .~N'D RESIDENCES ................ 10 4.21 WI~'DOW COV'ERL'N'GS ...................................... 10 IM'PROVEMENTS ............................................... 10 5.1 M.-~LN'TEN.~NCE OF LOTS AND RESIDENCES ..................... 10 5.2 ALTERATIONS TO RESIDENCES .~N'D OTI-I:E~ ~M~PROV~MENTS ....... 11 5.3 MAINTENANCE AND KEPAIR OF P.~KTY FENCE5 ................. 11 5.4 LA2qDSCAPLNG ................. , ......................... I1 $.4,1 Installation of Lludsc~ping ............................... 11 5.4,2 Maintez~uc~ of L~ud~c~ping ............. ' ................. 11 $.4.3 Inigation $.4,`* Water F~atuz~ ........................................ 12 $.`*.$ Publi,' Right-of-Way .................................... 12 $.4.6 Tree Protection Pl~n ......................... - ............ 12 5.$ INSUR.MqCE ............................................. 5.6 DAMAGE OR DESTKUCTION ................................. DEVELOPMF~NT RIGHTS ......................... ................ 12 6 I LIMITATIONS OF ]~:-~TRIC-IiONS 12 6.2 RIGHTS OF ACCESS AND COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION ......... 12 6.3 SIZE AND APPEARANCE OF PROYECT .......................... 13 6.`* MA~NG ............................................. LIT'~LE & SAPUTO ii 06/29/98 , it whatever" -.asurably nece. uary or advisable in cow' ion wi~ thc completion of the [ii) ere. al, construct and nuintai~ within any Lot owned or cor~'olled by ii such struc~rea as may I~ r~asor~bly nec~=,y for ~he conduct of ir, b,,,in~ to complete the.work, es=blish the Project a~ a residential community and di~'pose of tile Project in parcels by sale, Ica.se or otherwise. 6.3 $IZF. AND APP~.-~RA_N'CE OF PROJ1E. CT: Declara~ shall not be preven£ed from changing the exterior appear,_':ce of any improvements, landscaping or any other ma~zr directly or indirectly connected wir,h :,he Proje": La any manner deemed desirable by De¢lar',mt, if Declaran~ obtains a.ny governmental conse.,,~ re~.'k'ed by law and any other ¢on.sellls reqLlir~:l under agreemenr~ which bind Declarant. ART[CT 1: ARC~IT~.CT'UR_AT. A~D i' ANDSCAPI~G CONTROT. ] URING DEVEr OP I' NT 7.1 ._ARCHTI"EiCT[_"R_AT. APPROVAI,: 7.1. I t~lrOLTRFD: Except ~s otherwise provided in ~ Declaration. proposali fo~ Alterations. including :h~se by C~mm Builders. shall be subject rn r. he provisions of ~h/s .-M'~icle aii, a'~ no~ be .made un:fl approved La ac:ordance with the provisions of this ,-~wicle. The provisions oi ~ Declaration requiring archkec:ur~l approvals shall not apply to the original cons~ruc~on of ~n¥ rmprovements on a Lo~ by Decla,,"an~ ir~ agents, contrac:ots or employees. ,auchite~u~ and site approval for all house p!~* not previously approved by the City is required. Ia order to perform a proposed Alterahon. it may aLso be ~c.e~ary for an Owner rn obtain addflional approvals and/or permits from the City. Approval by the .*~rchir~,.h-al Design Comminee pursua~ to this Article does not relieve an Owner from obtal-i~g all other approvals z~d permits required by law or ordimznce. 7.1.2 TER.~,rr~'ATED: W'~en rile Architectural Design Committee determines, pursuant to Section 7.9, that the Improvew.¢r~rs on all Lots in the Project were constructed, in compliance wi~ ~ Declaration. the provisior~ of rigs .~,icle VII and Section 4.1 of thc Declaration shall tcrmirate arid shall be of no further force or effect and all members of the Committee appointed by Declarant who have not yet resigned will automatically be deemed to have resigned, 7.2 ARCHITI~,CTTJ'I~_-tJ, DF_~IGN COM?vfrITE~,: The A.,chitecnu~ Design Commim~ shall be composed of two (2) persons appointed by Declarant. Dcclaran~ may appoint replacements for 13 06~9198 ITT~--- ~. SAPUTO PETITION AGAINST USE PERMIT FO~R~q'BF,..~N GROUP SAI~ES_TRA!L_ER ON LOT 2-07 9/21/2002. . RE§iDENT - -Jo ~, .......... ADDRESS~ ..... ; - ~i LOT # · :/,-~,-~/~; ~,~:/~ ._.,y~_,~/~- ~~-.~_---~-- ~ ............ ~_; ....... ~ --- 3 ,o~ ...... ~_~ ~: ..:,, ........ !!~ ,~ ~_ ~~~ ...... U ......~ ....... 19~-- 201 Location of proposed sales trailer View of street 3 CITY OF CUPER TINO City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 Fax: (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department Housing Services Summary Agenda Item No. ~3 Agenda Date: October 21, 2002 Applicatiom U-2002-07, EA-2002-12 Applicant (s): City of Cupertino Property Location: APN#: 369-31-033 - 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino Civic Center Project Data: General Plan Designation: Public Facility Zoning Designation: Specific Plan: Project Consistency with: General Plan: Zoning: Environmental Assessment: P(BA) - Planned Development (Public Building) Yes. Yes. Mitigated Negative Declaration Application Summary: Use Permit to demolish the existing 37,000 square foot Library and construct a new 53,000 square foot 2-story Library and a 6,300 square foot Community Hall. The project also includes reconstruction of the existing Civic Plaza with landscape and hardscape improvements. RECOMMENDATION On October 14, 2002, the Planning Commission recommended approval of: 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration, file number EA-2002-12; and 2. The Use Permit application, file number U-2002-07, in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 6161. The Planning Commission adopted a Minute Action (Resolution No. 6162) to provided added comments related to safety, environmental, and energy issues (see attached). DISCUSSION General Plan and Zoning The General Plan allows public facilities and the project site is zoned P(BA) - Planned Development (Public Building). While development regulations do not establish Applications: U-2002-07, EA-2002-12 Cupertino Civic Center Page 2 October 21, 2002 specific heights or minimum setbacks, they require adequate light, air and visibility at intersections, general conformity with adjacent zones and lots, and screening to limit noise and reduce glare of lights. The proposed project has a maximum height of 45'- 6'and an overall site FAR of 0.19. The one-story community hall is 125 feet, and the two-story library is 250 feet from the closest residential properties to the east. Windows are minimized on the east side closest to properties and screened with trees, and light standards have shields that focus light on the ground. The project conforms to development regulations and will not result in negative impacts on adjacent properties. Traffic Analysis A Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed project was prepared by Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. to assess the potential traffic, circulation and parking impacts of the proposed project. The project is expected to add 28 AM peak hour trips and 178 PM peak hour trips. The analysis indicates that the project will not cause impacts to key intersections in the vicinity. All the streets in the vicinity of the project site have sidewalks on both sides, thus providing pedestrian access. The site also has good bicycle access via the bike lanes on De Anza Boulevard and the bike route on Rodrigues Avenue. The project site's proximity to public transportation (VTA bus line) is expected to facilitate use of public transit. Cut Through Traffic Neighborhood cut-through traffic is not expected to be significant along Rodrigues Avenue and Pacifica Drive. Approximately 33 additional PM peak hour trips (3% of average daily traffic) are expected on Rodrigues Avenue. Approximately 11 additional PM peak hour trips (2% of average daily traffic) are expected on Pacifica Drive (without the gate). The traffic calming measures proposed as part of the Civic Park project for Rodrigues Avenue and Pacifica Drive will also help reduce cut-through traffic and traffic speeds. Parking A parking study by the traffic consultant indicates future parking needs will be 293 spaces (270 on-site plus 23 spaces on Torre). The proposed project proposes a total of 300 spaces. This consists of 214 on-site spaces, 21 additional spaces along the soccer field and 65 on-street spaces on Torre Avenue. The proposed parking on Torre Avenue will provide 65 spaces including: 23 angled spaces on the west side of Torre along the Town Center site; 14 parallel spaces on the west side of Torre south of the Town Center site; and 28 parallel spaces on the east side of Torre. Therefore, no additional parking will be needed for the project. Per the code, racks to accommodate 15 bikes would have to be provided. Possible locations for the bike racks include the parking lot to the east of the library building, and adjacent to the sidewalk on Torte Avenue. Applications: U-2002-07, EA-2002-12 Cupertino Civic Center October 21, 2002 Page 3 Tree Removal The project proposes to remove 115 trees and relocate 51 trees to accommodate the new building footprints and plaza redesign. None of the trees to be removed are specimen tree types and about 40% are fruit trees. The trees to be removed are located north and east of the existing library building, along Torte Avenue, in the plaza, and in the parking lot near the proposed new buildings. As mitigation for the tree removal, 75 new trees will be planted around the buildings and in the plaza. The landscape plans also include a grassy swale to the south of the Library. The repaved parking lot east of the proposed Community Hall and Library will be planted with parking lot trees in a later phase. Environrnental Review The Environmental Review Committee recommended a Mitigated Negative Declaration with 75 new trees to be planted as mitigation for 115 trees proposed for removal. The mitigation has been incorporated into the project. of Community Development APPROVED BY: David W. Knapp, City Manager ENCLOSURES Planning Commission Resolution No. 6161 Planning Commission Resolution No. 6162 Planning Commission staff report dated October 14, 2002 Exhibit A: Executive Summary of the Transportation Impact Analysis prepared by Fehr & Peers dated September 2002 Initial Study Recommendation of the Environmental Review Committee Plan set G:\ Planning\ PDREPORT\pcUsereports\ U-2OO2-O7cc. doc RESOLUTION NO. 6161 U-2002-07 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 USE PERMIT FOR DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING 37,000 SQUARE FOOT LIBRARY/ AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 53,000 SQUARE FOOT 2-STORY LIBRARY AND A 6,300 SQUARE FOOT ONE-STORY COMMUNITY HALL, AND RECONSTRUCTION OF THE EXISTING CIVIC PLAZA WITH LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS SECTION I: PROIECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: U-2002-07, EA-2002-12 City of Cupertino APN#: 369-31-033 - Cupertino Civic Center SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the ne.cessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1. The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2. The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino General Plan and the purpose of this rifle. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, application no. U-2002-07 is hereby recommended for approval; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Resolution No. 6161 Page 2 U-2002-07 October 14, 2002 Application U-2002-07, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of October 14, 2002, and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on plan set dated September 16, 2002 and entitled "City of Cupertino - Civic Center," and as amended by this resolution. 2. PROIECT MODIFICATIONS Prior to the submittal of building permits, minor changes to the project, as determined by the Director of Community Development, shall be reviewed by the Design Review Committee. Major changes to the project shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission. 3. LANDSCAPE PROTECTION As part of the building permit submittal, a tree protection plan for the trees to be retained and relocated, shall be prepared by a landscape architect or certified arborist_ The landscape architect or certified arborist shall inspect the tree protection installation and provide a report to be approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 4. BICYCLE RACKS The applicant shall install bicycle racks to accommodate 15 bicycles near the parking lot to the east of the library building and adjacent to the Library building on Torre Avenue. 5. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults, backflow preventers and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground so they are not visible from public areas. The equipment locations shall be determined prior to issuance of building permits. 6. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this Resolution No. 6161 U-2002-07 October 14, 2002 Page 3 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of October 2002, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Saadati, Chen, Auerbach and Chairperson Corr COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Wong COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: / s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development /s/Charles Corr Charles Corr, Chairperson Cupertino Planning Commission G: \ Planning \ PD REPORT\ RES \ U-2002-07 res.doc CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6162 (MINUTE ACTION) OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER SAFETY, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES IN THE CIVIC CENTER PROJECT U-2002-07 SECTION I: PROIECT DESCRIPTION Application: U-2002-07, EA-2002-12 Applicant (s): City of Cupertino Property Location: APN#: 369-31-033 - 10300 Torte Avenue - Cupertino Civic Center SECTION II: ACTION The Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino recommends that the City Council consider the following elements in the design of the Civic Center project: · Approval of this project does not include approval of a book drop-off. The Planning Commission is concerned that a book drop-off will encourage unnecessary automobile trips through the parking lot, creating a hazardous situation for pedestrians and bicyclists. · Additional trees should be planted as mitigation for the trees to be removed. Donations from persons or organizations could be an option to get additional planting on the site at a reduced cost. · Daylighting and passive solar techniques (including solar-driven shades and lighting controls) should not be compromised in the plan. i Cost evaluation of the Civic Center project should consider the trade-off, between the upfront capital costs versus the savings in operating costs, of incorporating energy-saving/recyclable products and measures. · The City should seek grant funding for creek restoration and a trail along Regnart Creek. Resolution No.6162 U-2002-07 October 14, 2002 Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 144 day of October 2002 at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Auerbach, Chert, Saadati and Chairperson Corr COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Wong COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development /s/Charles Corr Charles Corr, Chairperson Planning Commission G:\ Plam~g\ PDREPORT\ RES\ U-2002-07res2.doc CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Tot're Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Applicatioru U-2002-07, EA-2002-12 Agenda Date: October 14, 2002 Applicant (s): City of Cupertino Property Locatiom APN#: 369-31-033 - Cupertino Civic Center Project Data: General Plan Designation: Public Facility Zoning Designation: Specific Plan: Project Gonsistency with: General Plan: Zonin~ Environmental Assessment:. P(BA) - Planned Development 0'~ublic Building) Yes. Yes. Mitigated Negative Declaration Application Summar3n Use Permit to demolish the existing 37,000 square foot Library and construct a new 53,000 square foot 2-story Library and a 6,300 square foot Community Hall. The project also includes reconstruction of the existing Civic Plaza with landscape and hardscape improvements. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of: 1. Mitigated Negative Declaration, file number EA-2002-12 2. The Use Permit application, file number U-2002-07, in accordance with the model resolution. BACKGROUND On September 16, 2002, the City Council reviewed the "design progress" plans for the Civic Center and were generally satisfied with the project concept. The Council had reviewed concept plans on March 19, 2002 and approved some of the major elements including the sloped roof of the library, the location and configuration of the new Library and Community Hall, the plaza configuration, landscaping and water features. DISCUSSION Project Scope The proposed project site at the southeast comer of Rodrigues and Torre Avenues and includes Cupertino City Hall (24,000 square feet) and the Cupertino public library Applications: U-2002-07~ EA-2002-12 Cupertino Civic Center' Page 2 October 14, 2002 (37,000 square feet) with a plaza in between the two buildings. The existing library building is proposed to be removed and a 53,000 square foot library building is proposed to be constructed in its place. The project also includes a new 6,300 square foot community hall east of the plaza. The plaza is proposed to be regraded and the existing level is to be raised to the level of the sidewalk along Torre Avenue. General Plan and Zoning The General Plan designation is Public Facility and allows public facilities with a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.33. The project site is currently zoned P(BA) - Planned Development (Public Building). The proposed project proposes will result in an overall office FAR of 0.33, which is consistent with the General Plan. Therefore, the project is consistertt with the General Plan and Zoning. Design Library The new 53,000 square foot library building is proposed in the same location as the existing library building (with a larger footprint) and is oriented toward the plaza and Torte Avenue. The proposed building is two stories with a central courtyard. The second story overhangs the first story and provides a shaded walkway at the first floor level. The main entrance is aligned with the City Hall entrance across the plaza with trellised gateways leading to it from the parking lot and Torre Avenue. There is a staff entrance/exit on the east side of the building from the parking lot and an exit on the southwest comer of the building onto Torte Avenue. The ground floor includes a caf~ at the comer of Torte Avenue and the plaza with outdoor seating facing the plaza. The west side of the library has public reading rooms, and the east side of the library contains most of the administrative and staff functions. The materials proposed for the building consist of Roman tile in a tan color, with cement board panels in a "Swiss Pearl" gray. The windows are proposed to have a storefrom system with indigo colored mullions and frames. Community Hall The community hall building is single-story, 6,300 square feet in area and is located east of the plaza between the proposed library and City Hall. It has central meeting space to be used as the Council chambers and which can also be used for events including stage , events and dinner seating for 300 people. It incorporates a pitched metal seam monitor roof. The materials proposed for the building are similar to the library building, exc.ept that the Roman tile is proposed to be gray. The glazing for the monitor roof is proposed to be Cai-wall. The Community Hall building is connected to the Library and City Hall, with a loggia in front of the building. The loggia will be constructed of columns faced with cement panels, and concrete beams in a gray color. Bougainvillea vines are proposed to be planted at the base of the columns. Applications: U-2002-0~,'EA-2002-12 Cupertino Civic Cen~e.r Page 3 October 14, 2002 Plaza The plaza is proposed to be raised ~bout 2 feet to the level of the sidewalk on Torte Avenue. The plaza area is divided into quadrants as follows: · The southwest quadrant is proposed to be lawn with olive and sycamore trees; · ' The northwest "Cupertino Tree" quadrant is proposed to be decomposed granite with sixteen trees in four rows consisting of Oak, Sycamore, Big Leaf Maple and Camphor trees; · The northeast quadrant is proposed to be decomposed granite with precast concrete benches built into the north and west edges; · The southeast quadrant is proposed to be scored concrete with three rows of fountain jets with lights that can be turned off to make the area available for an event!. Lighting for the project consists of reusing some existing plaza lighting in the parking lots and at the rear of buildings and new light standards in and pedestrian bollards in the plaza and around the proposed buildings. Street furniture including benches, outdoor dining furniture, planter pots and trash receptacles are also proposed. A material board will be available at the meeting. Traffic Analysis A Traffic Impact Analysis (Exhibit A) for the proposed project was prepared by Felxr and Peers Associates, Inc. to assess the potential traffic, circulation and parking impacts of the proposed project. The project'is expected to add 673 daily trips, which include 28 AM peak hour trips and 178 PM peak hour trips. The analysis indicates that the project will not cause impacts to key intersections in the vicinity. All the streets in the vicinity of the project site have sidewalks on both sides, thus providing pedestrian access. The site also has good bicycle access via the bike lanes on De Anza Boulevard and the bike route on Rodrigues Avenue. The project site's proximity to public transportation (VTA bus line) is expected to facilitate use of public transit. Cut Through Traffic Neighborhood cut-through traffic is not expected to be significant along Rodrigues Avenue and Pacifica Drive. Approximately 134 additional daily trips or 33 additional PM peak hour trips (3% of average daily traffic) are expected on Rodrigues Avenue. Approximately 36 additional daily trips or 11 additional PM peak hour trips (2% of average daily traffic) are expected on Pacifica Drive (without the gate). The traffic calming measures proposed as part of the Civic Park project for Rodrigues Avenue .a~d Pacifica Drive will also help reduce cut-through traffic and traffic speeds. Parking A parking study by the traffic consultant indicates future parking needs will be 293 spaces (270 on-site plus 23 spaces on Torre). The proposed project proposes a total of 300 spaces. This consists of 214 on-site spaces, 21 additional spaces along the soccer Applications: U-2002-0'~, EA-2002-12 Page 4 Cupertino Civic Center October 14, 2002 field and 65 on-street spaces on Torte Avenue. The proposed parking on Torre Avenue will provide 65 spaces including: 23 angled spaces west of Torte along the Town Center site; 14 parallel spaces west of Torte south of the Town Center site; and 28 parallel spaces on the east side of Torte. Therefore, no additional parking will be needed for the project. Per the code, racks to acconUnodate 15 bikes would have to be provided. P~ssible locations for the bike racks include the parking lot to the east of the library building, and adjacent to the sidewalk on Torte Avenue. Tree Removal The project proposes to remove 115 trees and relocate 51 trees to accommodate the new building .footprints and plaza redesign. None of the trees are specimen tree types. Specifical~l~. y, 15 Redwoods to the north of the library will be removed and one will be relocated off-site, 38 Cherry trees to the east of the existing library will be removed and 18 Cherry trees will be relocated in Memorial Park, 4 Chinese Pistaches at the entrance to City Hall will be removed, 32 Chinese Pistaches along Torte Avenue north of the "Japanese lantern" will be transplanted and replanted after grading is completed, 18 Chinese Pistache and Olive trees in and around the plaza and 49 trees in the parking lot (south of the City Hall parking area) will be removed. As mitigation for the tree removal, 75 new trees are proposed to be planted around the buildings and in the plaza. These include: 9 ornamental Pear trees to the east of the library building, 30 Honey Locust trees around the community building, 24 trees (Oak, Sycamore, Big Leaf Maple, Camphor and Olive) in the plaza and the 12 Chinese Pistache trees along Torre Avenue. 'The landscape plans also include a grassy swale to the south of the Library. The repaved Parking lot east of the proposed Community Hall and Library is proposed to be planted with parking lot trees in a later phase. Storm Water Quality Management The Regional Water Quality Control Board is requiring local agencies to reduce impervious surface and incorporate storm water .quality design techniques in their new projects. The proposed development will result in a net increase in impermeable surface. In order to retain water on-site and reduce run-off, the project includes~ decomposed granite for a portion of the plaza, and swales (to the south of the library and in the parking lot east of the library). The project will achieve approximately 80% on-site retention, which complies with current guidelines. Therefore, there will be no. significant impacts to the storm drain system. Environmental Review The Environmental Review Committee recommended a Mitigated Negative Declaration. with the following mitigation: 1. Trees: 115 trees are proposed for removal and 51 are proposed to be relocated to accommodate the new building footprints and plaza redesign. As mitigation for the Applications; U-2002-0/, EA-2002-12 Cuper~no Q¢_c center~:' October 14, 2002 Page 5 tree removal, 75 new trees are proposed to be planted around the buildings and in · the plaza. The above mitigation has been incorporated into the project. Submitted by: Am'ti Shrivastava, Senior Planner .. Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Commtmity Developmen~__~ ENCLOSURES Model Resolution for U-2002-07 Exhibit .~:~ Traffic Report prepared by Fehr and Peers dated September 2002 Initial Study Recommendation of the Environmental Review Committee Plan set G:\Planning\PDREPORT\pcUsereports\ U-2002-O3.doc EXHIBIT A FINAL REPORT · TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS LIBRARY EXPANSION (Cupertino, California) .. Prepared for: City of Cupertino Prepared by: Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. F~Ulk & PEEI~S TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT5 255 N. Market Street, Suite 200 San 3oso, CA 95110 (408) 278.1700 www,fehrandpeers.com September 2002 Fax (408) 278-1717 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cupertino Library TIA September 2002 P This report presents the results of the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) conducted for the proposed library expansion project in Cupertino, California. The purpose of the analysis is to identify the likely transportation impacts of the proposed project on the surrounding roadway system and to identify improvements to mitigate significant impacts. The future library will be built at the same location as the existing rtbrary. The project includes demolition of the existing 37,000-square foot library and constructing a new 53,000-square foot library. The project also includes a 6,000-square foot community building with a 160-person capacity. The project site is located on the east side of Torte Avenue between Rodrigues Avenue and Pacifica Drive. The library is located just south of City Hall and shares its parking lot with City Hall. Primary access to the proposed project is provided via a driveway on Torre Avenue and a driveway on Rodrigues Avenue. A. Analysis Scenarios The impacts of the proposed project were estimated following guidelines of the City of Cupertino and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) which is the congestion management agency for Santa Clara County. The operations often intersections were evaluated using the TRAFFIX software package, which is the adopted method for all agencies within the County. The operations of the key intersections were evaluated during the morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak hours for the following scenarios: Scenario 1: Existing Conditions. Existing volumes obtained firorn counts, representing peak one-hour traffic conditions during the morning and evening commute periods. Scenario 2: Scenario 3: Background Conditions. Existing peak-hour volumes plus traffic from approved but not yet cons~ucted developments i~ the study area. Project Conditions. Background peak-hour volumes plus proj ect- generated traCfic. Scenario 4: Expected Growth Conditions. Existing volumes increased by an annual growth factor of 1.2 percent per year to the p~rojected opening date of August 2004 plus approved trips plus-project traffic. . ~ Issues regarding site access, parking, and neighborhood traffic issues were also addressed. Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. Cupertino Library TIA September 2002 B. Project Traffic The mount of traffic generated by the proposed development was estimated by applying the "Library" trip generation rates to the library expansion fi:om the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trips associated with the community hall building were based on capacity of the building and an auto occupancy rate. The proposed project is estimated to generate a total of 28 net-new'AM peak-hour trips and 178 net-new PM peak-hour Irips. The trip distribution patterns for the project components were estimated based on existing travel patterns in the vicinity of the site and the relative locations of complementary land uses, primarily residential neighborhoods and schools. The proj ect-generated traffic was assigned to specific intersections and mining movements to determine the potential impacts of the proposed project. C. Intersection Levels of Service Using the information supplied by the City of Cupertino (existing counts, approved projects, and signal timings), data obtained in the field, and project traffic estimates, level of service (LOS) calculations were conducted for Existing, Background, Project, and Expected Growth Conditions. The City of Cupertino has completed the De Anza Boulevard & Stevens Creek Arterial Management Project. That project optimized signal coordination on these streets to enhance corridor and intersection efficiency. The cycle lengths determined by the arterial m a~ement project were obtained through the City of Cupertino traffic-engineering depat~[ment and used to calculate LOS at all of the affected key intersections. The results of the intersection level of service calculations are presented in Tables ES-1 a and ES-lb. The minimum acceptable opmating level of service for an intersection in the City of Cupertino is LOS D, with two exceptions. The City's General Plan states that the acceptable threshold the Stevens Creek Boulevard/De Anza Boulevard and De A~za Boulevard/Bollinger Road intersections is LOS E+ (with no more than 45 seconds weighted average delay)!/The minimum acceptable level for CMP-moultored intersections is LOS E. However, the City thresholds govern in terms of identifying impacts. Fehr & Peers/~sociates, Inc. Cupertino )Library September 2002 Table ES-la Signalized Intersection Level of Service Summar~ Intersection : Peak i Hour 'De Anza Blvd./ I AM Stevens CreekBlvd.3 ! PM De Anza Blvd./ ! AM Rodrigues Avenue i PM De Anza Blvd./ i AM McClellan Road ' PM De Aaza Blvd./ AM Bolliager RdJ !PM Stevens Creek Blvd./ : AM Tone Ave. ! PM Stevens Creek Blvd./ i AM Blaney Ave. I PM Blaaey Ave./ I AM Bollinger Rd. [ PM Existing Delay (see)~ LOSz 23.4 C- 27.6 D+ 14.5 B- 11.9 B 17.3 C 24.9 C- 19.8 C 15.8 C+ 8.8 B 8.5 B 17.2 C 19.7 C 10.2 B 11.2 B Notes: ~ Whole intersection weighted average ~pped delay Background Delay l (sec)I ; LOS2 25.4 i D+ 29.2 ! D 15.6 i C+ 14.2 B- 17.8 C 25.0 ! D+ 20.4 C 15.8 i C+ 9.2 B I0.0 B 17.3 C 20.2 C 10.2 B 11.2 B Project Delay (S~)! ; LOSz 25.4 " D+ 29.5 i D 15.8 i C+ 14.5 : B- 17.9 C 25.8 i D+ 20.5 ~ C 15.8 ; C+ 9.3 B 9.1 ':B 17.3 20.4 10.2 11.2 E~pected Growth Delay (sec)~ LOS~ 23.24 C- 30.8 D 16.5 C+ 14.6 B- 18.4 C 26.9 D+ 22.9 C 16.2 C+ 9.2'* B 9.1 B C 17.6 C C 20.8 C B 10~4 B B 11.5 B ,, =~scd in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections. LOS ~ons performed using the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual methodology for signalized in~ecfiom with adjusted saturation flow rates. (3viP inm~ection At thes~ locations, additlonal traffic w~s added ~o non-critical movements, so the ~ a~ delay ~ v~i¢~ d~. Table ES-lb Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Snmn~tFy Intersection Peak Hour 10.2 10.3 18.5 16.4 C 10.4 i B 9.9 ! A .411-Wa.v_~op Control~ Rodrigues Ave./ AM Tone Ave. PM Blaney Ave./ AM _Rodrigues Ave. PM Two-Way Stop ~ntrol: SB Torte Ave./ ¥ AM ?a¢ifica Dr. : PM E~sting Background Delay ! Delay' (sec) ! LOS' (sec) [ LOS3 B 10.4 ! B B 10.5 ' B C 19.0 C 16.9 C ', 10.5 B I 9.9 : B Project Expected Growth Delay Delay (sec) LOS~ (~ec) LOS~ 10.4 1L4 19.2 18.0 10.5 10.2 B 10.7 B B 11.6 B C 22.4 C C 21.0 C, B [ 10.7 B B[ 10.3 ' B Notes: ~ Dehy m~d LOS shown repreaeaat overall intersection for all-way stop control intersections a Deiay anti LOS shown m-pres~at worst, case mova-n~nt foi- two-way stop controlled intersections. ~ LOScalculafiomporfonn~dusingth¢ 1997HighwayCapaciO, Manualmethodology Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. iii Cupertino Library TIA September 2002 D. Intersection Impacts The City of Cupertino's TIA Guidelines and the Santa Clara County Congestion Management Program TIA guidelines were used to assess project impacts. Implementation of the proposed project would result in a significant impact if the addition of project traffic causes: 1. The level of service at a key intersection operating at LOS D or better under Background Conditions to deteriorate to LOS E or F, or An increase in the critical movement delay at a key signalized intersection operating at LOS E or F under Background Conditions by four (4) or more seconds and an increase in the critical V/C ratio by 0.01 or more, or The level of service at the Stevens Creek Boulevard/De Anza Boulevard or De Anza Boulevard/Bollinger Koad intersections to operate at LOS ]E or worse with more than 45 seconds of weighted average delay per vehicle, or 4. Degradation of the level of service at a CMP-monitored intersection operating at LOS E or better under Background Conditions to LOS F, or An increase in the critical movement delay at a CMP-monitored intersection operating at LOS F under Background Conditions by four (4) or more seconds and an inerease in the critical V/C ratio by 0.01 or more. According to these criteria, the project will not cause a significant impact at any of the City or CMP-monitored intersections. E. Other Issues Several other issues were evaluated in the TIA. These include: · Project site access · Parking · Neighborhood traffic issues The project's primary access points are via a driveway on Torre Avenue and a driveway on RocLdgues Avenue. The proposed project has shared access with City Hall. No modifications to the site plan access were reC°mmended. Adequate on-site vehicle circulation would.be providgd on the project site. Adequ.ate bicycle access would be provided to the project site. Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. Cupertino Library 77.4 September 2002 With completion of the library expansion, the project site would have 235 parking spaces plus 2 book drop-off spaces. The City does not have a parking requirement for libraries. Based on the existing parking demand at the Library/City Hall parking lot and population pmj ectiom for the City, it is estimated that the Library/City Hall parking demand would be between 260 mad 270 parking spaces. This parking demand could be met by the parking lot and on-street parking on Torte Avenue. The project site plan also indicates that bicycle racks will be provided for bicycle parking. The bicycle racks should accommodate 15 bicycles. The project would add traffic to the residential portion of Rodrigues Avenue, east of Torte Avenue. This traffic would be appmx'nnately tkree percent of the existing daily traffic on Roctrigues Avenue. The gate on Pacifica Avenue is currently inoperable. The gate is typically closed between 6:30 am and 8:30 am and 4:00 pm and 6:30 pm. I/the gate were to remain inoperable, some of the project traffic may use Pacifica Avenue to access the project site. The proj eot would add less than two percent of the existing daily traffic to Pacifica Avenue if the gate is not used. Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. City of Cupertino 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3251 £UPEI INO FAX (408)777-3333 Community Development Department · ,,'~['~'~'-~;:INITI~STUD,Y,;'-'~ENVlRONMENT~E"EVALUATION.CHECKEIS~~ Staff Use Only EA File No. EA-2002-12 Case File No. U-2002-07 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Attachments See Soume List Project Title: Cupertino Civic Center Project Project Location: 10400 Torre Avenue Project Description: The project consists of the followin(l Droiects: 1. Demolition of the existin(l 37,000SF library 2. Construction of a new 53,000 SF 2 story library at the demolished Library location 3. Construction of a new 6,300 SF Communitv Hall Center/Council Chambers in between the existina City Hall and new Library location 4. Reconstructin(l the existin(l Plaza with hardscaDe/landscaDe improvements. Environmental Setting: The site is Dart of the Cupertino Civic Center which encompasses City Hall, Civic Plaza and the Librarv. The proposed location of the new buildin(l is currentlv occupied bv an existin(l 37,000 sa.ft librarv. The site is bounded by City Hall and townhomes to the north and a soccer field to the south. Properties to the west consist of professional and medical office uses. To the east of the site are sin(lie family homes buffered by Reanart creek. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SIteArea(ac.)-9.75acres BulldlngCovemge- 12.41% Exist. Buildings-20.400s.f.+37.000 (to be demolished} Proposed Bldg. - 53,000 + 6,300 so.ff. Zone- P (BA~ Planned Devot. Public Buildinqs G.P. Designation - Public Facilities Assessor's Parcel No. - 369-31-033 If R?sidential, Units/Gross Acre - Total# Rental/Own Bdrms Total s.f. Price Unit Type #1 Unit Type #2 Unit Type #3 Unit Type #4 Unit Type #5 Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check) [] Monta Vista Design Guidelines [] [] N. De Anza Conceptual [] [] Stevens Crk Blvd. Conceptual [] [] Heart of the City Specific Plan . S. De Anza Conceptual S. Sate-Sunny Conceptual Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & Landscape If Non-Residential, Building Area - 59,000 s.f. FAR- 18.77% for entire site Max. Employees/Shift - 62+37 = 99 Parking Required 293 spaces Parking Provided 295 spaces Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area - YES I~ NO [] A. CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN SOURCES 1. Land Use Element 2. Public Safety Element 3. Housing Element 4. Transportation Element 5. Environmental Resources 6. Appendix A- Hillside Development 7. Land Use Map 8. Noise Element Amendment 9. City Ridgeline Policy 10. Constraint Maps CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS 11. Tree Preservation ordinance 778 12. CityAerial Photography Maps 13. 'Cupertino Chronicle" (California History Center, 1976) 14. Geological Report (site specific) 15. P~rking Ordinance 1277 '16. Zoning Map 17. Zoning Code/Specific Plan Documents 18. City Noise Ordinance CITY AGENCIES Site 19. Community Development DepL List 20. PubiicWorks Dept. 21. Parks & Recreation Department 22. Cupertino Water Utility D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 23. County Planning Department 24. Adjacent Cities' Planning Departments 25. County Departmental of Environmental Health D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES (Continued) 26. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space DJ'strict 27. County Parks and Recreation Department 28. Cupertino Sanitary District 29. Fremont Union High School District 30. Cupertino Union School District 31. Pacific Gas and Electric 32. Santa Clara County Fira Department 33. County Sheriff 34. CALTRANS 35. County Transportation Agency 36. Santa Clara Valley Water District OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS 37. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant Excesses 38. FEMA Flood MapslSCVl/VD Flood Maps 39. USDA, "Soit$ of Santa Clara County" 40. County Hazardous Waste Management Plan 41. County Heritage Resources Inventory 42. Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel Leak Site 43. CalEPA Hazardous Waste and Substances Site OTHER SOURCES 44. Project Plan Set/Application Materials 45. Field Reconnaissance 46. Experience w/project of similar scope/characteristics 47. ABAG Projection Series 48. Cupertino Civic Center Transportation Impact Analysis, Fehr & Peers, July 2002. 49. Geotechnlcel Report, Treadwell & Rollo, February 15, 2002. A. Complete all information requested on the Initial Study Cover page. LEAVE BLANK SPACES ONLY WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLICABLE. B. Consult ~e Initial Study Soume List; use ~e materials listed therein to ~mplete, the checklist information in Categories A through O. C. You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in ~eir title(s) in the "Soume" ~lumn ne~ to the question to which they relate. D. If you check any of the "YES" response to any questions, you must a~ach a sheet explaining the' potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed. E. ~en explaining any yes response, label your answer clearly (Example "N - 3 Histofl~l") Please t~ to respond concisely, and place as many explanato~ responses as possible on each oaae. F. Upon ~mpleting the check,st, sign and date the Preparer's Affidavit. C. Please a~ch the following materials before submiffing ~e Initial Study to the Ci~. ~Proje~ Plan Set of Legislative Document VLocafion map with site deafly ma~ed (when appli~ble) EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? [5,9,24,41,44] [] [] [] [] b) Substantially damage scenic resources, includ, ing, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? [5,9,11,24,34,41,44] c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? [1,17,19,44] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? [1,16,44] [] D [] [] Item b&d - Less Than Siclnificant Impact There ara no existing significant scenic elements on the project site. While the redevelopment of this site will create a new source of light within a developed setting, the light levels associated with the proposed library and community hall uses are not expected to adversely effect day or nighttime views in the area. II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: in determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? [5,7,39] b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson ACt contract? [5,7,23] ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? [5,7,39] Items a- c - No Iml~act The proposed site is not agricultural land. III. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria established by the applidable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? [5,37,42,44,48] b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? [5,37,42,44,48] c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteda pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? [4,37,44,48] d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? [4,37,44] e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? [4,37,44] .=_3=,. _.E [] [] [] [] O [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] Items a- c -Less than Siqnificant Irrmact The proposed project would have limited air quality impacts resulting from the minor pollutant emissions related to traffic generated by the proposed project. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) generally does not recommend that a detailed air quality impact analysis be prepared for projects generating less than 2,000 vehicle trips per day. The project is expected to generate an additional 673 average daily trips, which does not trigger a detailed air quality impact analysis under these BAAQMD guidelines. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, which in turn is consistent with the Clean Air Plan, therefore, no cumulative air quality impacts are expected to result from this project. The impact of dust generated by grading and excavation construction activities will be limited by a condition of approval requiring watering of newly disturbed surfaces and covering of haul trucks to minimize dust generation. Items d-e - No Impact The project is not expected to expose sensitive receptors (children, the elderly, the acutely ill, and the chronically ill) to substantial pollutant concentrations. The proposed development will not have any operations that will subject customers, employees or neighbors to objectionable odors. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian, habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? [20,36,44] d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native [] [] [] [] D [] [] [] 5 ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] resident or migratory wildlife corridor.s, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? [5,10,12,21,26] e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? ['11,12;41] [] [] [] [] f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habit'at Conservation Plan, Natural [] [] ~ [] Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? [5,10,26,27] Item e - Less Than Siclnificant Impact with Miticlation Incomoration 115 trees are proposed for removal and 51 are proposed to be relocated to accommodate the new building footprints and plaza redesign. None of the trees are specimen tree types. Specifically, 15 redwoods to the north of the library will be removed and one will be relocated off-site, 38 cherry trees to the east of the existing library will be removed and 18 cherry trees will be relocated in Memorial Park, 4 chinese pistaches at the entrance to City Hall will be removed, 32 chinese pistaches along Torre Avenue are proposed to be transplanted and replanted after grading is completed, 18 chinese pistache and olive trees in and around the plaza and 49 trees in the parking lot (south of the City Hall parking area) are proposed to be removed. As mitigation for the tree removal, 75 new trees are proposed to be planted around the buildings and in the plaza. The repaved parking lot east of the proposed Community Hall and Library is proposed to be planted with parking lot trees in a later phase. The current phase plans include a grassy swale running north-south behind the Library and providing irrigation for future trees. Item a-d, f- Less Than Siclnificant Impact The project is proposed on a developed site and will not impact threatened or endangered biological resources. The project includes landscaping, which will provide additional vegetation on the site. No Habitat Conservation Plans or Natural Community Conservation Plans cover the project area. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? [5,13,41] b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.57 [5,13,41] c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique [] paleontological resource or site or unique 6 [] [] [] E~ [] [] [] E~ [] [] [] ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] geologic feature? [5,13,41] d) Disturb any human remains, including [] [] [] those interred outside of formal cemeteries? [1,5] Item a-d No Impact The project is currently developed with commercial uses and is not in a sensitive archeological area of the City, There are no historical resources on the site, VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. [2,14,44,49] ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? [2,5,10,44,49] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? [2,5,10,39,44,49] iv) Landslides? [2,5,10,39,44,49] b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? [2,5,10,44,49] c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? [2,5,10,39,44,49] d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property? [2, 5,10,44,49] e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems 7 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water?. [6,9,36,39,44,49] Item a(I-iii), c-d- Less Than Sionificant Im/~act According to the Cupertino General Plan, the site is in a VF-3 zone for which specific hazards may include ground shaking and ground failure. A Geotechnical Report prepared by Advanced Soil Techology, Inc. indicates that the liquefaction potential will be Iow. Also, according to the report, the site will be subject to shaking amplification during earthquakes. The site is also in the vicinity of active faults including the Monte-Vista Shannon, Berrocal and San Andreas faults and will therefore be subject to strong shaking. The site however does!not lie within the Alquist-Priolo zones and no faults are mapped passing through the site or in its immediate vicinity. The buildings will be required to comply with the report's recommendations and Uniform Building Code requirements. Item a(iv) b, e - No Impact Since the project is proposed on an existing parking lot on a relatively fiat lot no landslide activity is expected. There will be no soil erosion or loss of topsoil. The site is served by an existing sewer system. VII, HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard*to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? [32,40,42,43,44] b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? [32,40,42,43,44] c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? [2,29,30,40,44] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant .hazard to the public or the environment? [2,42,40,43] e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result 8 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources:] in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency resp(~.nse plan or emergency evacuation plan? [2,32,33,44] [] [] [] [] h) Expose people or structures to a [] [] [] [] significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland rites, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?[1,2,44] Item b,d- Less Than Siclnificant Iml~act Items a,c,e-h- No Imf)act The proposed project will not generate additional hazardous waste, increase risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances, interfere with emergency services, increase exposure of people to hazardous waste or increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass or trees. The current project site is not listed as a contaminated site in the State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List. The project site is not within a two-mile radius of the nearest airport (Moffett Airfield/San Jose Airport). Therefore, there would be no related impacts on people residing or working in the project area. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? [20,36,37] b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? [20,36,42,49] [] [] [] [] c) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or [] [] [] [] 9 ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? [20,36,42] d) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? [20,36,37] e) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map ~)r other flood hazard delineation map? [2,38] f~ Place within a lO0-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? [2,38] g) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? [2,36,38] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] h) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or [] [] [] [] mudflow? [2,36,38] Item a, c.d- Less Than Siclnificant Impact The proposed development will result in a net increase in impermeable surface. However, the project will achieve approximately 80% on-site retention which complies with current BAASMA guidelines. The project includes additional features such as decomposed granite for some hard surfaces and a swale in the parking lot (east of the library) to retain water on- site and reduce run-off in accordance with BAASMA guidelines. Items b,e-h - No Impact Soil borings drilled to depths ranging from 11.5 to 41.5 feet on the site did not encounter groundwater. The building locations are in a B flood zone as per the FIRM maps dated May 1, 1980. As indicated above, the project site is relatively flat except for the plaza, which is about 2 ft. below the level of the existing City Hall and Library building. The Library first floor level will 1 foot higher than the existing City Hall building first floor. The grade at the plaza is proposed to be raised near the Library and will gently slope to its existing grade level near City Hall. The new Library building will be located on a portion,of the site that is currently occupied by the existing library. The community building will occupy a portion of the plaza and the parking area. IX, LAND USE AND PLANNING -Would the project: [] [] [] [] a) Physically divide an established community? [7,12,22,41] 10 ISSUES: rand Supporting Information Sources] b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [1,7,8,16,17,18,44] [] [] [] [] c) c(~nflict with any applicable habitat [] [] [] [] conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? [1,5,6,9,26] Items a-b - No Impact The project is in conformance with the City's General Plan and Zoning. Item c- Less Than Siclnificant Impact with Miticlation Incorporation The project will remove about 115 trees. Howev.er, none are identified as specimen or heritage trees. The project will provide mitigation with planting of 75 new trees around the buildings, in the plaza, and along Torre Avenue. X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? [5,10] D [] [] [] b) Result in the loss of availability of a ID locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? [5,10] Items a-b - No Im/~act Mineral resources are not known to exist on the project site, XI. NOISE -Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? [8,18,44] b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? [8,18,44] c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity 11 [] [] [] [] [] [] [] ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] above levels existing without the project? [8,18] d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [8,18,44] e) For a project located within an airport land 1:3 use plan or, where such a plan has not been adop{ed, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [8,18,44] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private [] airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [8,18] Item a-d - Less Than Siclnificant Iml~act [] [] [] [] [] [] [] The project is located in an area with noise levels 60dB (DNL) and less, which is considered normally acceptable for new office development. The City's Municipal Code standards (Chapter 10.48 Community Noise Control) for this type of development are that exterior noise may not exceed 55 dB at night and 65dB in the daytime. The project will not be subject to excessive levels of greundbome vibration or groundborne noise. The proposed development of the project site will intensify the use of the lot, which is likely to result in increases in the ambient noise levels that exist in the project area. Increase in noise levels would be periodic and will not substantially increase over current ambient noise levels. Items e,f - No Iml~act The project is not within a two-mile radius of any public airports or private airstrips, XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an [] area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? [3,16,47,44] b) Displac~ substantial numbers of existing [] housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] c) Displace substantial numbers of people, [] necessitating the construction of [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 12 ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] replacement housing elsewhere? [3,.16,44] Item a -Less Than Sic/nit/cant Iml~act The development of the new library and community buildings on the site is consistent with the General Plan, which included an analysis of population and housing and was reviewed in an EIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not induce substantial population growth or create a demand for housing that would be inconsistent with the General Plan. Items b-c - No Iml)act The proposed project would not displace existing housing. There are currently no residential units on this site. Xlll. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? [19,32,44] Police protection? [33,44] Schools? [29,30,44] Parks? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] Other public facilities? [19,20,44] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] Item a -Less Than Sionificant Iml~act The project is located in an urbanized area served by municipal services, including fire protection, police protection, and maintenance of public facilities such as roads. An infill project of this type and size will not significantly change or impact public services. XlV. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of [] existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] b) Does the project include recreational [] facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which 13 [] [] [] [] [] [] ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? [5,44] Item e-b -No ImrJact The project will provide added recreational opportunities both indoors and outdoors with a larger library facility, community room and changes to the plaza. XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC - Would the project: a) Ca~use an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? [4,20,35,44,48] b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? [4,20,44,48] c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? [4,48] d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [20,35,44,48] e) Result in inadequate emergency access? [2,19,32,33,44,48] f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? [17,44,48] g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [4,34,48] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] D [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] 14 ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] Items a,b,d-f - Less Than Siclnificant Impact A Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed project was prepared by Fehr and Peers Associates, inc. to assess the potential traffic, circulation and parking impacts of the proposed project. The project is expected to add 673 daily trips, which include 28 AM peak hour trips and 178 PM peak hour trips. The analysis indicates that the project will not cause impacts to key intersections in the vicinity. Some neighborhood cut-through is expected along Rodrigues Avenue and Pacifica Drive. Approximately 134 daily trips or 33 PM peak hour.trips (3% of average daily traffic) are expected to be added on Rodrigues Avenue. Approximately 36 daily trips or 11 PM peak hour trips (2% of average daily traffic) are expected to be added on Pacifica Drive. The proposed traffic calming measures proposed as part of the Civic Park project for Rodrigues Avenue and Pacifica Drive will help reduce cut-through and traffic speeds. The proposed project would not result in any change in air traffic patterns because the two- story library building is not tall enough to affect air traffic patterns. The Fire Department has determined that emergency vehicle access will be adequate. A parking study by the traffic consultant indicates future parking needs will be 293 spaces (270 on-site plus 23 spaces on Torre). The proposed project proposes a total of 300 spaces. This consists of 214 on-site spaces, 21 additional spaces along the soccer field and on-street spaces on Torre Avenue. The proposed parking plan on Torre Avenue will provide 65 spaces along Torre Avenue (23 angled spaces west of Torre along the Town Center site, 14 parallel spaces west of Torre south of the Town Center site and 28 parallel spaces on the east side of Torre). Therefore, no additional parking will be needed for the project. Per the code, racks to accommodate 15 bikes would have to be provided. Possible locations include the parking lot to the east of the library building and along Tone Avenue. All the streets in the vicinity of the project site have sidewalks on both sides, thus providing pedestrian access. The site also has good bicycle access via the bike lanes on De Anza Boulevard and the bike route on Rodrigues Avenue. Items c, cl- No Impact The proposed project consists of a the two-story building, which is not tall enough to affect · air traffic patterns. The project site's proximity to public transportation (VTA bus line) is expected to facilitate use of public transit. XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? [5,22,28,36,44] [] [] [] [] 15 ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Sources] b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [38,22,28,36] c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the consfruction of which could cause significant envin~nmental effects? [5,22,28,36,44] e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? [5,22,28,38,44] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? [5,44] [] [] [] [] g) Comply with federal, state, and local [] [] [] [] statutes and regulations related to solid waste? [5,44] Items a-f- Less than Siclnificant Impact Sanitary sewer service is currently available at the library site. The library and community buildings are not expected to increase demands on the sewer system significantly beyond the current use at the library site. Therefore the project will have no significant impacts. The project is not expected to increase demands that would exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Additionally, since the project. will be required to comply with BASMAA guidelines, it is expected that there will be nonet increase in runoff into the stormwater system. The General Plan states that the Santa Clara Valley Water District has indicated it has the ability to meet the long term water needs of Cupertino water retailers based on the maximum growth potential of municipalities in the district. Since the project is consistent with the Cupertino General Plan and Zoning Code, the projects impact on water usage is expected to be less than significant. Item q- No Impact ~ ~ The project will be required to comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. 16 ^v,,.,,v,~.u~.~,r~FINDINGS~.,F~SIGNIFICANCE.: ~ : ~:*~:,:,' , (To be completed by Ci.,,Staffl ,~,~,~,,:.~ .,~,~ ,-.~. ,: ':, , ISSUES: [and Supporting Information Soumes] a) Does the project have the potential to [] degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are [] individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental [] effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? [] [] [] [] [] [] PREPARER'S AFFIDAVIT I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appropriate source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences ,of such delay °r disc°ntinuance' Pieparer, s Signature.~.~/._ .(~_~ Print Preparer's Name 17 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [] Aesthetics [] Agriculture Resources [] Air Quality [] Biological Resources [] Cultural Resoumes [] Geology/Soils [] Hazards & Hazardous [] Hydrology / Water [] Land Use / Planning Materials Quality [] Mineral Resources I-I Noise [] Population / Housing [] ! Public Services [] Recreation [] Transportation/Traffic [] Utilities ! Service [] Mandatory Findings of Systems Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds that: The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. The proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT' is raquirad, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [] Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DEC~TION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the propql~ed~)roject, nothing further is required. ~l~l~aluat~l~' 4-' Date. ' I. · - ERI~ Ch air~'~ers~no ~#~ 18 CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE SelStember 25, 2002 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on September 25, 2002. PROIECT DESC~ON AND LOCATION Application No.: Applicant: Location: U-2002-07 (EA-2002-12) Cupertino Civic Center (Library) 10400 Torte Avenue DISCRETIONARY ACTION REOUEST Use Permit to demolish the existing library, construct a new 53,000 square foot library and a new 6,300 square foot Community Hall Center/Council Chambers, with an accompanying hardscape and landscape improvements. FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMi't'TEE The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Mitigated Negative Declaration to remove 115 trees and relocate 51 trees to accommodate the new building footprints and plaza redesign. 75 new trees are proposed to be planted around the buildings Director of Community Development g/erc/RECEA-2002-12 VIEW FROM CITY HALL TOWARD CiViC PLAZA HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES CITY OF CUPERTINO · CIVIC CENTER DRAWING LIST CUPERTINO CIVIC CENTER DESIGN DEVELOPMENT SUBMITI'AL 16 SEPTEMBER 2002 ~CHff~CTURAL LANDSCAPE GENERAL ROTES ABBREVIATIONS SYMBOLS LEGEND LOCATION MAP ASSUMED PROPERTY LINES PROJECT DESCRIPTION Ii '~, 100% DESIGh DEVELOPMENI PROJECI DESCR)PTIOh is not part of the Contract Documents prepare~ by SMWkL 111is drowing is ir~]uded with the Documents for the information of the Contractor only.. The Conbactor shall fiekJ ver'~y all information at the o~tset of the ~*o.lect and shall promptly natlfy SI~N and the O~ner of any devlat~or~. CUPER~NO UBRARY . UBRARY ADDISON FF=228.00 )0 '0 Oc · U CUPER~No ClT7 FALL FF=22~.71 W<:~ ISURVEY LEGEND ISURFACE I FGEN~ ~.____J IFURNITURE t EGEND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION .100% DESIGi~ DEVELOPMENI LAYOUT AND MATERIALS pLAN LEGEND ISURFACE LEGEND ISITE LIGHTING LEGEND r r-:::D f \ / © © NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Ii ii ,-- '~00% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT AND MATERIALS SITE-LI6HTJNG PlantList TREES PERENNIALS/GROUNDCOVERS COMMONNAME HONE~ LOCUST SWSET GUM CAMPHOR CALIFORNIA P~PPER TREE ORN. fl~E~4TAL PEA~ CO~ST REDWOOD CHINESE PISTACHE JAPANESE FLOWERING CHERRY SPACING REMARKS Plant / Symbol Legend TREES Q~ERCUS AGRIFOLIA CALIFORNIA LIVE OAK PL~TANUS EACEklO~A CALH=OP, NIA SYCAMOEE ® 0 Q SURFACE PLANTINGS PISTACIA CEINENSIS CHINESE PtSTACHE PRUNUS $ERRULATA %~NANZAN LOW PERENNIALS HEDGE VINES ViNE TOTAL: 72 PROPOSED, NEWTREES 17 RELOCATED, EXISTING TREES 'NOl1~: ED~STING TREES TO REMAIN AND (17) RELOCATED 'rR~ES 'NO'II~: 38 PEO~OSED, NEW VINES DESIGN ~EVELOPMENT PLANTING LIST IL4.0 ISURVEY LEGEND IPLANTING SCHEDULE IPLANTING SCHEDULE IPLANTING SCHEDULE ITl e e i I FIRST FLOOR PLAN St00% DESIGN DEVELOPI~ENT Iii F-,,sT FLOOR PLAN e. IA~.IO 9_ SECOND FLOOR PLAN '-- .iq 00% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT [__~- SECOND FLOOR PLAN ROOF P~I (~ 4~00% DESIGN OEVELOPI~ENT L· ROOF ~' PLAN '~I00% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT COt~MUNITY ~--' FLOOR PLAN fi) Il .~100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITYHALL ROOF PLAN l~.~l ? ?? \, T I / -- I I I COMMUNITY HALL HIGH ROOF PLAN -~-00% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY HALL HIGH ROOF PLaN NORTH ELEVATION -t-00% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT LIBRARY EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A~.O! ? ? o ? ? ? ? // SOUTH EL[VATIOH (~ EAST [IZVATION · lOON; DESIGN DEVELOPMENT LIBRARY EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ~..~,_.~- :~ ~ ! Ao.02 BUILDING~. i' - ~'SECTION (~) BUILDING $£CTION G ']00% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT LIBRARY BUILDING SECTIONS SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION '~'.00 % DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CO~dldU NITY .... HALL J~, EXTERIOR r~=~ ELEVATIONS ~-, ~ ©® . NORTH/SOUTH SECTION .O"T./SO."J?~,_O~ · l 00% DESIGN DEVELOPNIENT COIvIk4UNITY F-' HALL I__, BUILDING JECTiONS CITY OF CUPE iNO Agenda Item No. Iq City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3223 FAX: (408) 777-3366 kimberlyst~l~ulmr tino.or g OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SUMMARY Meeting Date: October 21, 2002 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Consider request for reinstatement to Public Safety Commission by Marc Majewski, pursuant to his written request (see attached email). BACKGROUND City Council Resolution 02-064 specifies appointment and attendance requirements for commission members. The attendance provisions are fairly rigid in order to increase the likelihood of a quorum for all meetings. Mr. Marc Majewski missed the Public Safety Commission meetings in June, July, and August. A termination letter was sent, and he requested a waiver of the termination and reinstatement to the Commission, which the City Council granted in August of this year. Mr. Majewski then missed the October meeting, as he explains in the attached e-mail message, and asks for the City Council's indulgence so that he may finish his term, which expires in 2004. RECOMMENDATION: Council's options include: A. Reinstate Mr. Majewski so that he may continue to serve his term, which ends January 2004; or Direct the City Clerk to fill the vacancy. Staffrecommends that this be done as part of the annual recruitment process for all commissions, and interviews would take place in January. Submitted by: Approved for submission: City Clerk David W. Knapp City Manager August 19, 2002 Page 2 ..... Original Messag~ ..... > From: Marc P. Majewski [mailto:mraajewski@pacbell.net] > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:35 PM > To: kimberlys@cupertino.org > Subject: auto termination AGAIN > > 20371 Gillick Way > > Cupertino, CA 95014 > > Friday, October 11, 2002 > Kimberly Smith, City Clerk > City of Cupertino, City Hall > 10300 Torre Avenue > Cupertino, CA 95014 > > Dear Ms. Smith, > > Well, it happened again. I missed last night's Public Safety Commission meeting, and as much as I would like to continue on the Commission, I don't suppose I could hope that the City Council would grant me a second waiver of termination. > > Though excuses don't help to maintain a quorum, I do feel the need to explain my absence in light of the Council's recent action to reinstate me .... Thursday, I heard that I would be laid off in a cost-cutting RIF, and in the shock of that event, I forget about the meeting. > > I do apologize. > > I would like to continue in my role as a Cupertino Public Safety Commissioner, and to finish out my term. However, under the circumstances, I will understand if the City Council does not reverse my automatic termination a second time. > > Sincerely yours, > > Marc P. Majewski, MSc, CSP, > CIH, CHMM, REA, CCHO, CHSM > > P.S. My old email address layoff. Please contact me at is no longer available due to the home at ekolstee@pacbell.net CITY OF CUPEI INO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3223 FAX: (408) 777-3366 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Summary Agenda Item No. I ~' Meeting Date: October 21. 2002 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Report on commissions and committees with terms expiring January 15, 2003, and selection of application deadline and interview dates. BACKGROUND There are nine commissions and committees created by ordinance of the Cupertino City Council. Commissioners serve staggered, four-year terms, and there is a two-term limit for each commission. If a person is appointed to fill an unscheduled vacancy, that partial term is not counted against the term limit. The Teen Commission was created by City Council Resolution No. 02-167 and follows a different appointment schedule. Terms expire on January 15 each year, and information about the upcoming vacancies is announced in November. Recruitment, appointment, and reappointment are governed by Resolution No. 02-064 and Government Code section 54970. The attached appointments list shows all boards and commissions whose members are appointed by the Council along with the incumbents' names, date of appointment, date of term expiration, and qualifications for the position. An asterisk indicates commissioners who have reached a term limit and are not eligible for reappointment to, that commission. Commission and Committee Term Expirations Page 2 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council choose one of the following: Application deadline: January 3, 2003 Interviews: Monday & Tuesday, January 13 & 14 Conference Room A, 6:00 p.m. Or: Application deadline: Interviews: January 17, 2003 Monday & Tuesday, January 27 & 28 Conference Room A, 6:00 p.m. SUBMITTED BY: City Clerk APPROVED FOR SUBMISSION TO THE CITY COUNCIL: David W. Knapp City Manager CITY OF CUPERTINO APPOINTMENTS LIST AND NOTICE OF VACANCIES 2003 There are nine commissions and committees created by ordinance of the Cupertino City Council. Commissioners serve staggered, four-year terms, and there is a two-term limit for each commission. If a person is appointed to fill an unscheduled vacancy, that partial term is not counted against the term limit. The Teen Commission was created by City Council Resolution No. 02-167 and follows a different appointment schedule. All meetings are open to the public. For more information contact the Cupertino City Clerk's Office at 777-3223, or visit our website at www.cupertino.om. CUPERTINO AUDIT COMMITTEE (No vacancies) The Committee consists of five members serving four-year terms. Two individuals are members of City Council, one is a member of City staff, and two are representatives from Cupertino businesses. The business representatives shall not be an official or employee nfthe City, nor cohabit with as defined by law, nor be related by blood or marriage to any member of the Committee, the City Manager or staff person assigned to the Committee. The powers and functions of the Audit Committee shall be as follows: (a). To review the annual audit report and management letter; (b) To recommend appointment of auditors; (c) To review the monthly Treasurer's report; (d) To recommend a budget format; and (e) To review City investment policies and internal controls of such policies. The committee meets quarterly as needed. Meetings are held January, April, July and October on the 3rd Tuesday of the month at 8:00 a.m. in Conference Room A. BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION (No vacancies) The Commission consists of five members appointed by the council to four-year overlapping terms, none of who shall be officials or employees of the City. All members shall be City of Cupertino residents. The function of the Commission is to review, monitor and suggest recommendations for City transportation matters including, but not, limited to bicycle and pedestrian traffic, parking, education and recreation within Cupertino. Meetings are held the third Thursday of each month at 7 p.m., City Hall in Conference Room A. 15--3 CUPERTINO HOUSING COMMISSION Terms Ending Richard Schuster Date First Apoointed Febmary 1995 Term Exl~ires January 2003 * *Not eligible for reappointment to this commission. The Cupertino Housing Committee consists of five members appointed by the council to four-year terms and the Director of Community Development, a non-voting member who provides technical assistance to the committee. The committee assists in developing housing policies and strategies, recommends policies for implementation and monitoring of affordable housing projects, helps identify sources of funding for affordable housing and other advisory functions authorized by the City Council. Meetings are held at 3:30 p.m., the second Thursday of the month at the City Hall, conference room C. The Cupertino Housing Committee falls under the Political Reform Act of 1974 and financial disclosure is required. FINE ARTS COMMISSION Terms Ending Janet Mohr Shirley Lin Kinoshita Date First Aooointed January 1998 February 2001 Term Exoires January 2003 January 2003 The Commission consists of seven members appointed by Council for four-year terms. None of the members shall be employees or officials of the City, nor cohabit with as defined by law, nor be related by blood or marriage to any member of the Commission, the City Manager or staff person assigned to the Commission. At least five shall be Cupertino residents. The powers and functions of the Fine Arts Commission shall be to foster, encourage and assist the realization, preservation and advancement of the fine arts for the benefit of the community. Meetings are held at 7:30 p.m. on the fourth Tuesday of the month in City Hall. The Fine Arts Commission falls under the Political Reform Act of 1974 and financial disclosure is required. LIBRARY COMMISSION Terms Endin~ Sheila Mohan Katherine Stakey Date First Aooointed January 1999 February 2000 Term Exoires January 2003 January 2003 The commission consists of five members appointed by the Council to four-year, overlapping terms. The commission advises the city council on the adequacy of library service within the community and such other matters relating to library service as specified by the city council; and serves as liaison between the city and the Santa Clara County library system. Page 2 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Terms Ending Kris Wang Jeanne Bradford Date First Aooointed January 1999 September 2000 Term Exoires January 2003 January 2003 The Commission consists of five members appointed by the City Council to four-year terms. The Commission advises the Council on the adequacy of library service within the community, and such other matters related to library service as specified by the City, Council, and serves as liaison between the City and the Santa Clara County Library system. Meetings are held at 7:30 p.m. on the third Tuesday of each month in City Hall. No Commission member may be an employee or official of the City of Cupertino, nor cohabit with as defined by law, nor be related by blood or marriage to any member of the Commission, the City Manager or any staff persons who may be assigned to this Commission. At least three Commissioners shall be Cupertino residents. The Parks and Recreation Commission falls under the Political Reform Act of 1974 and financial disclosure is required. PLANNING COMMISSION Terms Ending Charles (Chuck) Corr Taghi Saadati Date First Anoointed January 1999 January 2002 Term Exvires January 2003 January 2003 The Commission consists of five members appointed by the council to overlapping four-year terms. The commission's primmy function is to advise the city council on land use matters such as specific and general plans, zonings and subdivisions. The commission reviews other matters as specified by city ordinances or Title VII of the Government Code of California. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMISSION (No vacancies) The commission consists of five members appointed by the council to four-year, overlapping terms. The primary functions are to advise the city council on all areas relating to public safety, traffic, and police, fire and other matters relating to the foregoing. Meetings are held at 7:30 p.m. on the second Thursday of the month, City Hall conference room A. Page 3 TEEN COMMISSION 2002-03 (No vacancies) The commission consists of thirteen members, at least on person from each public middle school and public high school in Cupertino. Membership on the Commission will be limited to Cupertino residents. Members may attend schools outside of the city limits, or be schooled at home. Commissioners must be in 8th through 12th grade. Seven commissioners are appointed in odd-numbered years to two-year terms and six to one- year terms. The opposite is tree in even-numbered years. The powers and function of the Teen Commission is to advise the City Council and staff on issues and projects important to youth. The Commission meets twice a month on the 2na Tuesday and the 4t~ Thursday of each month at 5:30 p.m. TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Terms Ending Salvatore Algeri David Eggleston Date First Aooointed January 1997 January 1999 Term Exoires Januat~y 2003 January 2003 The Commission consists of five members appointed by the council to four-year, overlapping terms. They shall advise the city council on all matters relating to telecommunications within the city of Cupertino, including evaluating compliance with any franchise or other agreement between the city and a telecommunications provider and conducting periodic reviews of providers, facilities, and products. In addition, members serve as liaisons between the city, the public, and telecommunications providers in enhancing education and information. The commission also provides support for community access television, especially public and educational access, and gives guidance when needed for development and implementation of access channels and programming. Meetings are held the first Wednesday of each month at 7 p.m., City Hall in conference room A. The Telecommunications Commission falls under the Political Reform Act of 1974 and financial disclosure is required. Request an application frOm the office °fthe Ci~ Clef~ 777~322~ 6r Applications are due bY 5~00 P.m Interviews ar~ ~h~dhl~d fo~ in Conference K6om A at Page 4 PARKS AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item Number Agenda Date: October 21, 2002 SUBJECT Select November 18 at 5:00 p.m. in Conference Room C for a joint study session with the Parks and Recreation Commission regarding the Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan. BACKGROUND On October 7, the City Council received background information on Blackberry Farm, McClellan Ranch and other city-owned properties in the Stevens Creek corridor. Staffpresanted focus group findings and the results of the community-wide telephone survey regarding the properties in the corridor conducted by Godbe Research & Analysis. Council suggested a workshop with the Parks and Recreation Commission prior to starting the master plan process. The Parks and Recreation Commission will be taking public comment during the development of the master plan and will benefit greatly from understanding Council goals for the master plan. November 18 has been suggested as a workshop date, prior to the start of the regular City Council meeting. It was suggested that the workshop be conducted at the Blackberry Farm Retreat Center, but staff is concerned there may not be enough room to seat all members &the public that may be interested in listening to the Council discussion. In the interest of time and space, it may be better to schedule the workshop at City Hall. Brian Godbe will be attending to answer questions Council may have regarding the report he made on the community wide survey at the October 7th meeting; a portion of the time will be devoted to a question and answer session. Staff seeks direction from the Council regarding the degree to which the master plan should accommodate existing uses, at the expense of other changes. An example of one area where every idea cannot be accommodated is moving the entrance to Blackberry Farm to Stevens Creek' Boulevard. Preliminary review by public works and planning staff shows that changing the entry drive, while preserving the Stocklmeir orchard and enhancing the riparian corridor means that the entry relocation comes at the expense of the golf course. How important is the golf course in the future of the corridor? Stevens Creek Corridor Master Plan October 21, 2002 Page 2 of 2 Each Council member will be asked what they feel is important for inclusion in the master plan--what they think will make the project successful. (Staff will return at a subsequent meeting with a list of master plan priorities for the Council to consider adopting, as the next step in the process.) STAFF REQUEST It is expected that the workshop will take approximately two hours. Staff requests that this workshop be scheduled for November 18 or some other time convenient to the City Council. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY COUNCIL: Therese Ambrosi Smith, Director Parks and Recreation Department David W. Knapp City Manager ORDINANCE NO. 1904 DRAFT AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AIvlENDING CHAPTER 10.68 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING DEFINITIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN that the following sections of the Cupertino Municipal Code shall be amended to read as follows: Section 10. 68. O10 is hereby amended to read as follows: 10.68.010 Definitions 2. 12:01 a.m. until six a.m. on any Friday or Saturday cr ~,,~n., PUBLICATION CLAUSE: The City Clerk shall cause the title of this ordinance to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City within 15 days atter its adoption, in accordance with Government code § 36933, shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and her certification, together with proof of publication, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of the Council of this City. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days after its passage. INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the 21st day of October 2002 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the __ day of 2002, by the following vote: Vote: Membem of the City Council Ayes: Noes: Absent: Abstain: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE PRESENTED AT THE MEETING City Council October 21, 2002 U-2002-07, EA-2002-12 Civic Center RECOMMENDATION On October 14, 2002, the Planning Commission recommended approval of"' 1 Mitigated Negative Declaration, file number EA-2002-12 2. The Use Permit application, file number U-2002-07, in accordance with Resolution No 6161 The Planning Commission also adopted a Minute Action with added comments on safety, environmental and energy issues. PROJECT Use Permit to demolish the existing 37,000 square foot Library and construct a new 53,000 square foot 2-story Library and a 6,300 square foot Community Hall The project also includes reconstruction of the existing Civic Plaza with landscape and hardscape improvements. civic center site plan GENERAL PLAN & ZONING General Plan - Public Facility Zone - P(BA) Development regulations - · Adequate light, air and visibility at intersections · General conformity with adjacent zones and · Screening - noise and glare of lights. · The proposed project has a maximum height of 45'-6"and an overall site FAR of 0.19 REDWOOD GROVE TORRE AVE. L~ ........ ~~ .... Z ~--'~'~ ~ .. ... ~ ' -,~ ~ LOBBY library Parking lot first floor plan TORRE AVE. REFERENCE LM I-- ELI CD CD O CIVIC P I~..A library second floor plan PARKING LOT library looking southeast community hall meeting room plan W Z W 0 > 0 community hall view of Fountain and Community Hall LIBRARY COMMUNITY HALL F- Z UJ il I civic plaza site plan civic plaza looking east TRAFFIC Traffic Report Trir~s: · 673 daily trips added · 28 AM peak and 178 PM peak trips added Neiqhborhood cut-throuqh · Rodrigues Avenue- 134 daily and 33 PM peak trips · Pacifica Drive - 36 daily and 11 PM peak trips PARKING .~-: ..-~-_-'_.... ~, '1'1' .:r.:: Required Provided - 293 spaces - 300 spaces TREES 32 TREES removed Removed- 115 trees; relocated- 51 trees 12 trees ~ .~ TORRE AVlENUE I a ong ~orre ~ . · . ~ . . . . .'. .[ .... ~. . ~[ ~ ~ ~ lit I ~...,.. ~, · ~ I b I . . ~ 1.~~ ~.~ ~, ;~ . . . .... .. ..;~ .... · , ~ ---, ~ : .=~ ~ . ~ ....... · . ~ .-,.. . . .,- ..~...:...-,.-.~ ~ '~ -.- - pe~r trees~... '~'" COmm. Haft New- 75 trees PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION On October 14, 2002, the Planning Commission adopted a Minute Action with following comments: · The approval does not include a book drop-off. · Additional trees should be planted. · Daylighting and passive solar techniques should be retained · Consider trade-off between capital costs a.nd operating costs of incorporating energy saving products and measures. · The City should seek grant funding for creek restoration and a trail along Regnart Creek. City Council October 21, 2002 U-2002-07, EA-2002-12 Civic Center