The URL can be used to link to this page

TR-2010-27b � OFFICE OF COMMUIJITY DEVELOPMENT CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENiJE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 C U P E RTI N 4 (408) 777-3308 • FAX (408) 777-3333 • planninqCa�cupertino.orq September 15, 2010 Ben Engelman 11652 Bridge Park Court Cupertino, Ca. 95014 SUBJECT: TREE REMOVAL PERMIT ACTIO: V LETTER - Application TR-2010-27: This letter confirms the decision of the Direct��r of Community Development, given on September 15, 2010, approving a tree removal permit to i emove and replace seven (� protected trees, located at 790 South Blaney Avenue, with the followi Zg conditions: 1. APPROVED PROTECT The approval is based on the Arborist re port prepared by David Babby of Arbor Resources, Registered Consulting Arborist #399, d�ited July 2, 2010 except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. TREE REPLACEMENTS The applicant shall be required to plant three (3) 36-inch box size Coast Live Oaks (Quercus Agrifolia), one (1) 36-inch box size Coast I:edwood (Sequoia sempivirens "soquel"), and six (6) 24-inch box size Coast Redwood (Sequoia sempivirens "soquel") in the locations identified on the attached plans. In the event that these trees die or are removed, they shall be replaced with the same size tree or in accordance with 1 he requirements of the Protected Tree Ordinance as deemed appropriate by the Director of Co�nmunity Development. 3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESE]ZVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions con:;titute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedic�ations, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day a��proval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exacti�ns, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest v�ithin this 90-day peri�nd com�l.ying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. Staff has made the findings necessary to grant the tree removal permit in accordance with Section 14.18.180 of the Protected Trees Ordinance. A:.so, please note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar days from the date c f this letter. If this happens, you will be notified of a public hearing, which will be scheduled befor� � the Planning Commission. Cc: SincerelY, Blaney Venture, LLC, 1448 Entrada Verde Place, Alamo, 94507 �• Mr./s. Kansal, 20031 Suisun Drive, Cupertino, 95014 Mr./s. Lu. 820 South Blanev Avenue. Cu�ertino. 95014 Piu osh — � Associate Planner City of Cupertino AR�oR R ESOLIRCES professio consulting arborists and tree care AN ARBORI�►T REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 790 S. BLANEY AVENUE CUPERTINC�, CALIFORNIA Subn�itted to: Piu Ghosh Community Dev�;lopment Department City oi'Cupertino 10300 T�rre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Prepared by: David L. Babby Registered Consz�ltingArborist #399 Board-Certified Mas ter Arborist #WE-4001 B °-� 2 0 � o- z�7 �i��' � � ��'� ��`�I�L ��{�:� �: ._. � i i � �/� ��'�:�r`��'��: �� July 2, 2010 O E�.-D1�. p.o. box 25295, san mateo, californ�a 94402 • email: arborresources@comcast.net phone: 650.654.3351 ■ fax: 650.24C.0777 ■ licensed contractor #796763 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 2, 2010 TABLE OI� CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 1 2.0 TREE COUNT AND COMPOSITION .................................. 2 3.0 SUITABIL�TY FOR PRI;SERVATION ............................... 3 4.0 REVIEW OF POTENTI.�L TREE IMPACTS ....................... 4 4.1 Tree Removais .............. ................................................... 4 4.2 Tree Replacements ............................................................. 5 EXI�IBITS EXHIBIT TITLE A TREE INVENTORY TAE LE B SITE MAP C PHOTOGRAPHS (includf s photo index) ,-.�•.�,: _��t� �� C�i/�i(� 'i:,t�'-: q '� SP �� • i�� ,��'�� U3�� M _ DE�. DIR• i David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist� July 2, 2010 1.0 INTP.�DUCTION I have been retained by the City of Cupe -tino Community Development Department to prepare this report in connection with the proposed development at 790 South Blaney Avenue, Cupertino. Specific tasks perfarm�d for my review are as follows: ■ Identify trees presented within this r�port. ■ Measure each tree's trunk diameter at 54 inches above grade or where appropriate to obtain the most representative sainple of trunk size; diameters are rounded to the nearest half of an inch. Trees listed with more than one trunk have multiple trunks. ■ Estimate each tree's canopy spread i furthest distance across). ■ Ascertain each tree's health and strt ctural integrity, and assign an overall condition rating (e.g. good, fair or poor). ■ Determine each tree's suita.bility for preservation (e.g. high, moderate, or low). ■ Assign a number to each tree, and �how those on a copy of the Tentative Map by Nordic Engineering, dated January �:010; see E�chibit B. ■ Specify whether any of the trees ar�; regarded as "street trees" or "protected trees" pursuant to Cupertino's Municipal ('ode. ■ Review the proposed plans and iden tify potential impacts. ■ Identify the size and amount of trees required for installation to mitigate those that are removed (pursuant to Table 3-1, Section 14.18.185 of the Code). ■ Obtain photographs of each tree; the se can be viewed in E�chibit C. ■ Affix round aluminum tags with e ngraved, corresponding numbers to the trees' trunks. ■ Prepare a written report containing the aforementioned information, and provide recommendations to help mitigate cr avoid anticipated impacts to trees that will be retained or removed. �`"�"R- 2v►o Z -""` �, � �''� '�' �� i��l�. _. . . ,._ . Q_._�.� $'_..! "--- . . ::;; : �;'� � �: �� : .� DIR. � � C� f�4 PV� _ E�.. 790 S. Blaney Avenue, Cupertino Page 1 of 6 City of Cupertino Community Developmertt Departn rent David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist� July 2, 2010 2.0 TREE COUNT AND COMPOSITION Seven (7) trees of three various species were inventoried for this report. They are sequentially numbered as 1 thru 7, and include five coast redwoods (#1, 3, 4, 6 and 7), one camFhor (#2) and one blackwood acacia (#:�). Specific data recorded for each tree can be� viewed in E�hibit A (Tree Irrventory Tablej. Also, their locations are presented on the site map in Ezhibit B, and photographs are provided in Exhibit C. Pursuant to Section 14.18.035(C) of the Ci1y Code, the seven inventoried trees are defined as "protected trees." Trees #1 thru 4 are also regarded as "st reet trees" and regulated pursuant to Chapter 14.12 of the City Code due to being locatecl within the public right-of-way (along Clifford Drive). The trunks of all others are situated within the property boundary. On lot 3, there is a tree identified on the �lans as a 6" pine. This tree is a healthy and seemingly stable blue spruce with a six-inc:l trunk diameter and canopy spread of ten feet. It is situated in very close proximity to tl-e proposed home and will require removal to accommodate construction. At the south end of lot 2, the plans identiiy two oaks (5" and 8"}. These trees are fruit trees and not oaks. '��avl 0 1��7' All other trees on the site are small ornamer tal, fruit or �y�►res�,-�`�es�+ ?�� ;-�nY'�°''b��°"°r�� _, . ._ �I- �5'�� -- ��T1.9��: � [?�i4. 1[� � C� 790 S. Blaney Avenue, Cupertino Page 2 of 6 City of Cupertino Community Development Departrr ent David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 2, 2010 3.0 SUITABILITY FOI� TREE PRESERVATION Each inventoried tree has been assigned eitt er a"high," "moderate" or "low" suitability for preservation rating as a means to cumiilatively measure their physiological health, structural integrity, anticipated life span, Ic cation, size and specie type. A description of these ratings is presented below. High: Applies to none of the trees. These trees have a high potential of provi ding long-term contribution to the site. They have seemingly stable structures and appear in overall good health. Moderate: Applies to trees #1, 2, 3, 4 and 7. These trees contribute to the site, but not seemingly at significant levels. Their longevity and contribution is less than those of higr suitability, and more frequent care is needed during their remaining life span. For trees #1, 3 and 7(redwoods), this mod�rate rating applies only if ineasures to mitigate the potential risk associated with their multi-trunk growth can be initiated, such as reducing the height of one or more trunks, as well <<s installation (and periodic inspection, such as every year or two) of support cables; absenl of these measures being employed, they would be more accurately rated as a low or low to moderate suitability. For tree #4 (redwood), in the event that signs were identified to itidicate it has partially uprooted, it would be assigned a strong low suitability for preserv �tion. Low: Applies to trees #5 and 6. These trees are predisposed to irreparable h�alth problems and/or structural defects that are "T72- zu� �:: - f ; expected to worsen regardless ofineasures E�mployed.'��.`��_'��'`��'� ��'��►� � _ C,..� �',ii � i �. , ,� � t'�, "_� � � �.i 1 t �� : n �v`� �---'__ •��. Y D�lP DIR, 790 S. Blaney Avenue, Cupertino Page 3 of 6 City of Cupertino Community Development Departn ent David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 2, 2010 4.0 REVIEW OF POl'ENTIAL TREE IMPACTS 4.1 Tree Removals The proposed plans identify removal of the seven inventoried trees, and a summary of the impacts to each are as follows: ■ Trees #1 (redwood) and 2(camp �or) are within the footprint of the proposed driveway for lot 1, as welI within the footprint of the proposed curb, gutter and roadway design. ■ Trees #3 and 4(redwoods) aze al so within the footprint of the proposed curb, gutter and roadway design. ■ Tree #5 (blackwood acacia) is situated beyond proposed construction and would not seemingly be impacted by the project; however, it should be immediately removed regardless of the propose � project; it has partially uprooted and can be regard�d as hazardous. ■ Tree #6 (redwood) is also situated beyond proposed construction; however, it has declined to such a significant exte lt that recovery is unlikely, and I suggest its removal regardless of the proposed ��roject. ■ Tree #7 (redwood) is situated withir the footprint of the proposed home on lot 4. As mentioned above, I recommend the �•emoval of trees #5 and 6 regardless of the proposed project. For trees #1, 2, 4 and 7, it is my opinion that due ta their inferior structural condition, revising the proposed design does not appear warranted, and their removal for development purposes would seemingly cc�nform to the Town Code. Tree #8 also does I K� �.�i..:�9� L ',' not warrant protection and redesign due to i :s small size. � �� 4 � � " r =' `�� ° � � � � �,��5� � E� !�. ; ::� . G1- ; t ------=.:'_��'; - s: 6 �:`: I'a :'�T a.: � � : ..�.'. _.�..m l.�� C��i Y DE�f. DIR. 790 S. Blaney Avenue, Cupertino Page 4 of 6 City of Cupertino Community Development Depart�r ent David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist� July 2, 2010 Tree #3 appears to be the most suitable for retention, although to achieve minimum protection, a setback of at least 15 feet fro� n the center of trunk would be required for the proposed curb, gutter and roadway. To my understanding, the m�imum distance that can be achieved is about nine feet from the trunk's center, a distance that would subject the tree to premature decline and instability. ��Vhen considering the tree's weak structural formation, which would require pruning, cabling and regular inspection throughout its remaining lifespan, any expense for a major redesign does not seem warranted. In the event the 15-foot setback can be employed without requiring major revisions, then I can be consulted to further review and provide additional protection measures. 4.2 Tree Replacements Pursuant to Table A, Section 14.18.185 af the City Code, mitigation for removing the seven "protected trees" inventoried for this report includes the installation of the following minimum amounts and sizes of new trees o�i-site: � Three of 36-inch box size (perhaps :;ix of 24-inch box size as an alternative) ■ Either three of 3b-inch box si2e ar s x of 24-inch box size ■ Two of 24-inch box size The specific type of new trees should consist of a combination of one or more of the following: valiey oak (Quercus lobata), ��oast live oak (Quercus agrifolia), California black oak (Quercus kelloggii), coast re iwood (Sequoia sempervirens) and red oak (Quercus rubra). These particular trees sh��uld be installed at least 15 to 20 feet from any foundation or future hardscape, the same distance apart, and at least ten feet from any future fencing. .,, . �1� ,;z. r�.� �`� .. ;'�.��i'� A�r��IAL. � -�,: -�.;�-: .._. `� , �� _ �,� . . F�..�.�.� c..�; �:7 1 �,.r, i �,s , : � ".r i"� � . ,�� o�v. fleR. 790 S. Blaney Avenue, Cupertino Page S of 6 City of Cupertino Community Devedopment Departn rent David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 2, 2010 All new trees should be installed, includin�; necessary irrigation, by an experienced staxe- licensed landscape contractor or a professional tree company, and performed to professional industry standards. They sha Il be planted prior to final ins}�ection, double- staked with rubber tree ties (may not be necessary for multi-stem trees) with no cross- brace, and all forms of irrigation be of an a utomatic drip or soaker hose system placed on the soil surface and not in a sleeve (this sh ould be shown on the appropriate detail in the landscape plan). Prepared By: Date: July 2, 2010 David L. Babby Registered Consulting Arbori� t� #399 Board-Certified Master Arbor ist #WE-4001 B r s �, �,, � J '- �� ' ,�. � . .; �, —� � �� ; � 17 r-.„ J s a�:;v `s �[� e a� �!��V�'tfL �,%�`°�''__, e� I`..J YC'' �.+�;:Ai`�;�°�i�ti,1r"��(�: �� .C��; t�/1 � �lFV. �'3lR. 790 S. Blaney Avenue, Cupertino Page 6 of 6 City of Cupertino Community Development Departn rent David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 2, 2010 EXHIBIT A: TREE INVEIUTORY TABLE � �;� , . � F ��i� F p��? k:: r?"A �.;..<„; �i i w r�:.... , S , l�F��i��L. � n- «��` �a > i.� . ._.� �' 1'`.s / t_1 � � �; �,�. � �,1 � �: l/� � � ��1 Y D��f. DIR. 790 S. Blaney Avenue, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Development Depart nent ARBOR i�ESOLIRCES professional consulting arborists and tree care TREE INVEN,rORY TABLE 0 � � � 0 0 3 '- o o � �� b ° '" a �a�i ,� o 00 0 •.., o i � �� .°�' ;.� o �. � � U —. � v ..�.� � c � c � � � v a) O.i' TJ N t� � � �j I� � I� U w �' ° ~ TREE '� � � � b � b � a '° � � � ' � � o o � o -:� �,o � NO. TREE NAME � W n � o � o �� coast redwood 24.5, 22, 1 (Se uoiasempervirens) 20 3` 50% 25% Poor Moderate X Comments: Canopy is sparse, ikely due to an inadequate supply of water. Visible base of ttunk is about 55 F lus inches in diameter. The structure is comprised of three trunks originating 7om the same stump, and consequently, there is an increased risk that one or mc re trunks could fail in the foreseeable future. camphor tree -: ` 2 (Cinnamomum camphora) 18 3` 75% 50% Fair Moderate X Comments: Lower canopy has been excessively pruned in past, and as a result, there is an increased chance c f branch failure in the remaining canopy. coast redwood � � 3 (Se uoia sem ervirens ) 27, 24.5 4f 75% 50% Fair Moderate X � Comments: Visible base of tru ilc is about 70 plus inches in diameter. Comprised of two trunks that originai e from the same stump and form a nanow, weak angle of attachment. There are large, dead branches suspended within the mid-canopy, one over the street and one against the trunks. , coast redwood �% 4 (Se oia sempervirens ) 24.5 3( 75% 50% Fa'u Moderate X Comments: Base is covered by sucker growth and not visible. The tree's top was removed or broke sometime ago. Entire trunk leans, possibly due to having partially uprooted in past (difficult to confirtn due to the suckers restricting visibility). If it did paitially uprc �ot, the risk of potential failure increases substantially, and would be regarded as being in poor condition and having a low suitability. Base of trunk is about t}� ree feet from existing driveway and � feet from street. blackwood acacia , 5 (Acacia melanoxylon ) 27.5 2_` 75% 25% Poor Low , Comments: Signs that this tree which inherently has a weak structure, has partially uprooted can be observed, s� �ch as the tree leaning (towards the street), and on the side opposite the lean, t he ground is raised, the roots have surfaced, and there is a opening or crack b:tween the roots and ground. This tree should be immediately removed _ ;. , . � � � .� �� a �,.�� + .��i�� _ ._—�,�•.. • E . 6: � ......��5�� Site: 790 S. 8leney Avenue, Cuperfino � Prepared for. City of Cupertfno Comm. Deve%p. Depart. ,. i'. ,'• �, j' [� ;��# � �'� Prepared by: L?avid t. Babby � of 2 ,� iF�s�,� � _ . R. ARBOR Y�ESOLIRCES professionai consulting arborists and tree care TREE INVENI'ORY TABLE � 0 � � �� 3 3 3 � °' :� �, � o o� ;,o b � o a� a��i � " ° °' � :o ° o � � ,� 'O +-' � ++ w a� U, p� "" a fn i O� �LS a� A 'o �: Cj C�A '� �0.�1 C� w :�' o H � `� TREE � � � � b � ° � o � � U � O � O y p bA y NO. TREE NAME � W�� x° r „ ° p� v� x v, coast redwood _ � 6 (Sequoia sem rvirens ) 20, 12 35 25% 50% Poor Low Comments: Tree is in an advan ced stage of decline, and its demise in the neaz future appears likely. coast tedwood 25, 25, 24, ,� 7 (Se uoia sempervirens ) 23 SC 75% 25% Fair Moderate Comments: Comprised of four hvnks originating from the same stump, and consequently, creates a weakenec structure prone to the potential failure of one or more trunks in the foreseeable 1 uture. A significant amount of sucker growth restricts visibility of the lower trunk�. �-�/U--� � � � � R•� i� �, �' �:�' �� ` � �1, � � �ii�,e�il��.. �J�r`�1\"�4� ��r/�� ✓ ' �...�IVf� � D�V. D'�. Slte: 790 S. B/aney Avenue, Cupertino Prepared for. City of Cupe►fino Comm. Develop. DeparL Prepa�ed by: David L. Babby 2 of 2 July 2, 2010 David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 2, 2010 EXHIBIT B: SITI: MAP p,72 -acr c� ._ �. � '',:';'`�f=°":;"�"'�;��'�� J�►�'�F�C?ol'�ll., � P � 9- r.s d�_. ; � ..,. �� t � ��k�',� �,�F�§��: _ ��,�� . EV. DIR. 790 S. Blaney Avenue, Cupertino City of Cupertino Community Devetopment Depari ment 790 5. BLANEY AVENUE Cupertino, California � _ M[Mfi� fQ 1!P Q [:R`�! V rw u�c aur�r N NI�/CX C I3T� 'e � oc � o ;� > ..ro .,.,� � �' -l:.•A}I Q 1!'IIQDIR 1l.1[� i IE'PifPP:li -��I�I n1 '-a " ' B�75'C•:J" 1�. L76b'CS ".k : I/b� . . . . �.... � _ _ � .. . . .. . . � � . ... ... ... ... ... Y.R:i ...IS 1:_I!1' iS Im{' i5 Im3' .�:•.� i'sip � Cem ... ... . �iXt - , if �� ^� �� 71�111 F.lE ,� rt • " _- _- _ ---- _ '`' . ` WTf :: : �- . � \ / _. � 1 . � \ � � . . . � ... ` - _ _ 1 _ _ T - � \ E ar ,. �R - - LnT � _ w c •.� �'�� L='T � %� �'y � imur�� - � ° ' aF'�: �'• -FE- iceeruu:-ic. �.F_� -F'E- �o iosr FT � -- FT i,-�r¢ •a:us , _ � ' a � I . ia•.w•.K� a�m ti:a � � � 6X :. � �: �/ � fL�iil' i0 ' .• - 3 �y � � IC � � � �'� . .�. F' 00 •-iaoz' n�� . .. ' u IL _ .. K �� • � 1 ' ` � �.;!«`;�c. ', � lF.� 0 � .�i;.;,,� . _. � - - t..e '°" -F11 oo2-�I-i��.7 � �•• ' r•_u¢. � � ' ... �� :F:t:� . . �, -� -� � �r , +I. -PE- � � � �7 .. �:. � �'.; • xuv� r. �' ' ' °' • _�f':::' 'pE' � f _� ei-..- � C'-14iENl#T .d.' L - 7 A ; FT Q�.,��ii�: U-iFnlivJ� "••• �'' I :'G 1 • _ _ I L ' nrx¢� a x.ru �vca.mi m I IET - F . E_ , ."_ � , - �' _ - - � __1T.../6741iLF.:1TA_ ' ' '_." rcimm�,:n.i� `�:i�'•.� : FT . I - ryo v[ omotirai a ov-� � s 31- - I �r�n« ov e. �an . � °►--u�` �si �r�7 - '. . � r-F'r-- _F'E- � -L� L[ _ ' ' . .. - i`i�c.i � •--- - - FT , • . , � � � -r ia�a� - � :. . Zk� a'I . . •:�PlC•- X ♦ ' ' _ - X TM�i X .c.� ' .'�1� e�ncmowu �.�s d�L{ ` � - xc' . , X �fruit� .. , � -.• �,� , . �: � �M , . CP-IF.E INIFT � GP.6i.l�}iD3 At�¢, utE ILT1L ►D,i:L.11iJ1 IIT '-T i �� t� a' nw m�o�.r�c��.� � ,. � X .ir;.x¢�r•.•�s�.az•i- ir�r�r ic•::s ';' p�L -10 LNNP � MENICN LN�IIiD �� • '\6�IiiC�.C'dAiL. � . , JWLL� �.��T_ _ .. SGT.JL'JIQTi �c' . ' • , X :F ' _F'E_ �•T�lH{ fQ E- LiT• � /\ '.r.�. ,-1� � I FT x ., �-, _- x � / �� ' . � , mJll N[ "fdK � tt7! + 4A1P7 - . \/ ' � J� �: ryG Jy.E I' - li' � � � / `Cn1iS�L11 , � wc nre . ' - iC ��TRf � ` � t RN�� LE �aE� 1�'; " � X , aa uuc •:unFi-rr> ar �w4r�uc v �:�i,.��, spruce �� _�,e;,'• _ � — - — :o� �� X �r� . . x1 . . -_-- NiI1T�F'-�IIE �. ' ��i IE'10' ICI�PIL'-iiiPC-Lf!'! 1:._. CoMal' up[ - ^3-0�^17{L iwiL ' F.iX LdT \�[ / �a IH57{� :" M!l1E P^.11 PHM �PE Qs.[ iF -'AI-LT ' . • . / \ ' • p+ RL'�T [f N � )lWa1 ��11� - :JIT��:[ A IMIIMtt[ F 5 M:lQ' tP-�[ f L F47 YNL /i i1119EL M1JJ� ` . U[�[PIE.ifi.:N - � ep. . �; 8':H.IPNQ � 1} IN4711 IL' 18' W-II IIIIFI P.W �F�V1�Fi11@ " RO WIC49fO�IqY' � . IE'-G- ` �a�.R_ X .cax 1�-x7EL !'!(• uo� nnuc . M7l�1619 ♦ nM i � - 'a'TQ.:n:4 _,� iWUN[fARRT.l7:•� , David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist July 2, 2010 EXH IBIT C: PHOTt)GRAPHS Phoi:o index Page C-1: Trees #1 thru 4 Page C-2: Trees #5 thru 7 -�— ��s3 ..�,� i r s i;; �,l'4�`� ��. . .. n+e t � ✓�:i q��irr '.�r---- 790 S Blaney Avenue, Cupertino , 9-F :� �b-� ��-i �� ; �,.--''�� City of Cupertino Commurrity Development Depart nent � �� R David L Babby Registered Consulting Arborist � �uly 2 , 2010 � � � � !1! ,� � � ... � ` +� �, � � i � ° � O � ` r.�J � "'� _ B, � , �� "° e&.. r,3 � �s✓ 'r. �, a `T 790 S. Blaney Avenue, Cupertino Page C-1 City of Cupertino Community Development Department David L. Babby, Registered Consulting Arborist� July 2, 2010 � � � Q �� .aQ� � _�� 1 LjJ _� � , >� � ._ � Q w� � � ��Q� �Q � ,,�.: . �-� .�i�� r �,�- . � �� »� � _ "��%� - y 'f ., �_ � . � � � 1 � . �, » �� r . � r� �C � ' � ��7 ��. � ��. fi ��_ � � � �� '� �..��t . � �. . . F� 790 S. Blaney Avenue, Cupertino Page C-2 City of Cupertino Community Development Department Plant List: All low water nadve or naturallzed plant material See L-3 fa plenUng deteils and nWes AU Arbutus unedo'Standard' Strawberty Tree Std. 15gc CS Cuu�essus sempervlrens Itallan Cypress 15gc 3'Dla.@: ED Eriolwtrya deflexa Braize Loqual 15yc LI Layerstromla I.'Tuscarora' White Crape MyNe 15yc MB Maylenus b.'Green Showers' Maylen Tree 15gc PC Pistada chlnensls Chinese Pistache 24" Box PI Prunus Wafora HoNyleaf Cheny 15gc 6'Dia.�; QA Quercus agrifdia 'Std' Coast Live Oak 36" Box R=3 RWD Sequda semp; Soquel' Coast Redwood 24" Box R■6 RWD3B SeQuoia semp: SoQuel' Coast Redwood 36' Box R�1 Shrubs: CC Ceanothus'Coneha' Mountain Lylac Sgc CO Cercis occidentaus Westem Redbud 5gc CH Cistus hyd�idus While Rotkrose Sgt CP Cistus puryurous Orchid Rockrose Sgc DV Dletes vegeta Yelbw Fortnight LYy Sgc HD Hemerocalis'Pink' Pfnk DaylYy 5gc GN GrevNYa 'Nodi' GreWNia Sgc KU KnlDhofla uvaria Red Hot Poker Sgc LL Lomandra IongMoMa Mat Rush Sgc BIo.Swale MT Magndla stellata Star MaynoNa Syc MA Mahonla a.'Canpata' Dwart Oregon Giape Sgc ND Nandlna d.'Canpacta' Cpt Heevenly Bamboo Syc PS Pennisetum'Rubrum' Fountain Grass Sgc PF Phodnia frase�l Photiiia 5gc PN Punk,a g.YJana' Dwarf Panegranate Sgc RH RapMdepis'Majestic Beauty Indla Hawthom Std. 15gc SR Strdlzla reykiae BhC of Paddlse Syc Other: DI Draln Inlel Tree Replacement list: OA Querousag�ifoMa'Std' RWD Sequda semp.'Soquel' RWD36 Sequaa semp.'Soquel' See Civll Plens Coast Live Oak 36" Box R�3 Coast Redwood 24" Box R�6 Coast Redwood 36' Box R=1 Y M O � \// \ O � O G � - �F �� ` Q �`J �t ' 1 v �) ;J . . . . ..- t x � � ,-,. �a •.^ti c� �: � ,, �1 . i� S �,�r. . �, ' �.J ': � i �1 �. ... � .. . � "'r.'�,� . �--��-iv -� _.,.. .,_, _. .t,..rv.�a,..:n� , t ' `ti ( �: i :'� e. � 1,,i i y l"S 1'�� r-.. .. + 1 ..� � ' ` i �� 4� �� i' � . „ LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN scale: i"=10'-0" � � � 0 '"� U � � � Z � � � 0 Z NO.I DATE/ REVISION �-�nei�o 2-e��r�o 3-8/1{NO 4•8N7H0 5 - 8/18I10 6 - 8/19/10 G� diy b �� 'a ` �� 6 g O v� P �� S� O� �'' V 00 � � � � � a��°� d � � � � C/] �.J � m O" �i�,,, - � � V w � N � C }, � 0 �� O � AaN�� C tC a � C C � a fl. V � � •` � N � J � c0 r U (6 � 0 � = C .� � � .� � � a m U � � � � � � � � OATE 04123/10 $cKE � "_� Q� PRQIECT MMIAOER DJ �� JRIDJ JOB NO. AA-03 SMEET 1