Loading...
CC Exhibits 08-03-2010 Item No. 11 EXHIBITS BEGIN HERE EXHIBIT t Applicant: Bradley Head, NSA Wireless (for Clearwire) Appellant: Norman & Ione Yuen Project Location: 6191 Bollinger Road (West Valley Presbyterian Church) Project Scope: A personal wireless service facility on the roof of an existing church consisting: ❖ Three (3) panel antennas • Three (3) microwave dish antennas ❖ The facility is screened by a faux cupola and a base equipment enclosure On May 27, 2010, the project was approved by the Director of Community Development. s ir t- - An Sry sip° >rv�'r gg f x .�_....._....c -... .�.._ _ u.n. ..... _. 1 ii . . .. "Liri- it 4 01 CU, RT Y`• _ The project was appealed by Ione Yuen on June 10, 2010. Basis of her appeal is as follows: 1. The cupola design covering the antennae is visually awkward 2. The placement of the proposed WiMax antenna is inappropriate next to a middle school 3. The equation in the original application (RF study) is wrong � S A T CUP��R J 0 7 "Prohibits local agencies from regulating personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with Federal Communications Commission Guidelines for such emissions" 2 CUPERTINO ' Cupolas are a common �' * '� � �6 architectural feature of churches .". � ' ➢ Faux cupola is not disproportionate in size or height . 4 ➢ Faux cupola uses compatible colors and materials . IV A CUP CRT. „s • Cupertino follows U.S. law in regulating PCS and WiMax (broadband radio wireless service) facilities • PCS and WiMax have the same public exposure limits established by the FCC (1.00 mW /cm • The limit applies to continuous exposures, providing a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size or health • Estimated exposure is 0.0027 mnW /cm (0.27% MPE). • The proposed facility is consistent with the City Wireless Facilities Master Plan and Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance • The City has previously approved similar applications. The project is required to disclose the operation of the wireless facility to the church, /private school users and verify the radio frequency energy post - construction 3 Typical Exposure from Various Radio Frequency / Microwave Sources 350 ttEe „ E 300 250 2 250 (((( ))))) E 200 150 100 M;ikr 1111 100 P 6' 50 30 20 15 1 1 0.1 Pace and FM CB Microwave Cordless Baby Typical Max. Typical PCS Mobile Radio Mobile Oren Phone Monitor Public Public Radio Station Radio Exposure Exposure in Transmitters from a PCS Nci:bborhood Tram:mision Site • The report equation to calculate power density is not wrong. It was taken from the FCC Technical Bulletin No. 65 • Hammett & Edison is present tonight to address the Commission on the RF report if necessary 4 CUB R : Numerous speakers had the following concerns: • Inadequate noticing. Should have noticed renters & parents of Hyde M.S. students. • WiMax technology is too new. Not tested. • City should favor DAS technology over other wireless technologies. • Concerns with possible health effects of RF energy. • Area is being treated differently than other areas with respect to siting such facilities near schools. cveRTINO • TIC Commissioner input • City Attorney input • Letter from Sheriff's Office • Public input • Hammett & Edison, RF consultant, input • Applicant input 5 C I R y --...- ._ Planning Commission deliberated at length on the project and concluded it had limited discretion under the Federal Telecommunications Act. Facility design was acceptable. The Commission recommended denial of the appeal of the Director's approval of DIR- 2010-05 per the model resolution on a 4 -0 -1 vote. The Commission requested that the Council consider additional post - construction RF energy monitoring to address some of the residents' concerns. i 6 EXHIBIT tE /1 Oiturch wrataX 'O1.0.r rnol +rple e ntacl S cc.18 - 1 - 1/) Linda Lagergren From: Marcia Ludwig [mludwig417 ©earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 7:39 AM To: City Council Subject: West Valley Church Cell Tower Dear City Council Members: I am a 40 -year resident of Cupertino living at 6247 Shadygrove Drive which is directly behind West Valley Presbyterian Church. I have recently received notices from my neighbors objecting to the proposal before you to grant permission for the church to install a cell tower inside a cupola. Because you are hearing from my neighbors who object, I am want to let you know that at least one neighbor believes this tower is FINE. I see NO OBJECTIONS to having it placed there. I welcome the chance to have better reception. I see no danger in receiving radiation. The design is fitting for a church. I am a Presbyterian but not a member of that church. I know that many other Presbyterian churches have also installed towers on their property and have had no ill effects. I respectfully ask that you please pass this request. Marcia Ludwig 1 CL /8 -3 - /O 1/ Linda Lagergren From: Sara Jamie Newell [bearnkd @rocketmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 3:19 AM To: Gilbert Wong Subject: Clearwire antennae Dear Council member, I came home to find a protest form at my door. I agree with what was on the form. A Presbyterian church would never have a cupola on it. That is for Catholic an Baptist churches. I believe the whole cupola deal was a cleverly disguised ruse to get the antennae up in that location. Shame on the city and clearwire for lying and scheming to put people in harms way! It seems the city just cannot be square with people. I will make sure my father signs the protest form and goes toi the city council meeting. Sara Jamie Newell if 1 cG /8 -3 -l0 !I Linda Lagergren From: kemito kemito [kemito68 @hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 12:55 PM To: Kris Wang; Gilbert Wong; Orrin Mahoney; Mark Santoro; Barry Chang Subject: WiMax antennae issue Dear Mayor and Council Member, I am writing this email about the installation of the WiMax Antenna at West Valley Presbyterian Church next to Hyde middle school. I do believe that every parent in Hyde middle school has the right to know what is going on with this project. Church and Clearwire deliberately chose this timing to file application so no one in Hyde middle will be informed since it is closed for summer. Here is the link to the related the petition and some details about this pro http : / /noroof4wimax,wordpress.com/ Thanks, XHIBI Aioub Our petition is on San Jose Mercury News Paper, 07/30/2010, 2nd page. OR: Check the link below. http: / /www.mercurynews.com /ci 15633 558 ?IADID = Search- www.mercurynews.com www.mercurynews.com &nclick check =l> Just an update: So far about 150 people from our neighborhood signed the petition. I believe more on the way. 1 NO Roof for WiMAX Antenna Page 1 of 5 cc-/e-3-1 jt , I • Home • About • Aug -3 • Make a Stand • Show Support! • What WiMAX? Ex H I • Search NO Roof for WiMAX Antenna EVERY ONE, Aug -3, says NO to Cupertino DIR- 2010 -05 Feeds: Posts Comments Church WiMax Planning Commission Meeting on Monday night August 1, 2010 by noroof4wimax From the Yuens, Please let any concerned neighbors know about this meeting. We will still meet to plan at 7pm at our home if you would like to come and we can walk over to the church at 7:45pm. Thanks again for all of your support. Regards, From: Mikkel Lantz Date: Sunday, August 1, 2010, 2:17 PM Ms. Yuen, I have been able to contact many of our board members. I have arranged to hold a meeting the the Sanctuary at Monday Aug 2 at 8:00pm to 9:00pm. Sincerely Mikkel Lantz Posted in Uncategorized I Leave a Comment » Received a call from the Church July 31, 2010 by noroof4wimax Hi All, I received a call from the church and Mikkel Lantz, the president, is attempting to get a meeting together for Monday night before the Tuesday night City Council meeting. I would love to be able to give him the petition then, so if you have any signed petitions, please get them to me by Monday morning so I can add the addresses to our map and make copies before our meeting. Thanks for your efforts! httr, / /nnrnnfaawimay wnrrinrecc.com/ 8/2/2010 NO Roof for WiMAX Antenna Page 2 of 5 I will keep you all informed if I hear anything more from him. He did mention that many people have called the church...Thank you. Warm Regards, Ione EXHIBIT Posted in Uncategorized I Leave a Comment » Petition on San Jose Mercury News Paper July 31, 2010 by noroof4wimax Hello all, Our petition on San Jose Mercury News Paper, 07/30/2010, 2nd page. Here is the link. (Neighbors take wireless antenna battle into their own hands) Neighbors near Hyde Middle School in Cupertino have launched a campaign to stop the installation of a broadband Internet antenna with three microwave dishes at West Valley Presbyterian Church, citing potential health hazards. Just an update: So far about 150 people from our neighborhood signed our petition. I believe more on the way. Please forward to anyone, if interested. even church, City of Cupertino, City Consol, mayor..... Thanks, Posted in Uncategorized I Leave a Comment » Next Steps for WiMax antennae issue July 30, 2010 by noroof4wimax (From The Yuens) Hi all, I did get a response from Mikkel Lantz, the President of WVPC. Since it is summer, he thinks that we can have a meeting in a few weeks. Apparently the pastor is on vacation until August, but this Sunday someone else is giving the message. I did mention that the City Council meeting is this Tuesday, so that a meeting a few weeks from now is not helpful, but I have not received a response yet. I think that it would be best if we could approach the meeting with the church as a large organized contingent of the neighborhood. I know that some have suggested trying to stop by at the church on Sunday, but Norman and I have responsibilities at our church on Sunday so we are unable to be there. However, if you feel you would like to express your concerns to the church with phone calls or visits, I hope that the church will be responsive. So far we have about 150 neighbors who have signed our petition. I hope this is something that the church will consider when we get the opportunity to meet with them. A website for us to utilize: http : / /noroof4wimax.wordpress.com/ I think that it would be great if everyone can log on and begin to organize our presentation for Tuesday's City L++..• / /nnrnnfaxvima umrrinrecc rnm/ 8/2/2010 NO Roof for WiMAX Antenna Page 3 of 5 Council meeting. The agenda is already posted at Cupertino.org and under City council agenda all of the documents are posted including the updated staff report. Unfortunately we are listed as item number 10 on the agenda. One suggestion we received is that the best way to delay the installation is to have a petition to say that the neighbors think that the aesthetics of the cupola is bad. Since that is the only power that the city has, if the neighbors think that the it is ugly, then the city could deny this design and they would have to redo it.....although it is not the real issue, it would allow the city to vote along with us. So if you have the time to circulate this second petition, that would be great, unfortunately because Norman and I are unable to do it this weekend. I have attached the letter I sent to WVPC, the most recent f. -yer that we have been circulating, the original petition and the Aesthetic Rejection petition. Wimax_petition , Aestetics Rejection of Wimax Cupola petition We would like to invite anyone who is interested to our home to discuss the details for the City Council meeting on Monday at 7:00pm. Thanks for all of your support! Ione EXHIBIT Posted in Uncategorized I Leave a Comment » The petition to: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino July 29, 2010 by noroof4wimax To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. (Please print and sign the hard copy: Wimax petition) Posted in Uncategorized I Leave a Comment » New Flyer for neighbors July 29, 2010 by noroof4wimax I have made a flyer • For your neighbor: Flyer4Home.0729 Please print them out and share with others before the meeting. Eric.Wu Posted in Uncategorized I Leave a Comment » httr,•/ /nnrnnf4xx,imay wnrdnrecs com/ 8/2/2010 NO Roof for WiMAX Antenna Page 4 of 5 A letter from Ione Yuen ... July 29, 2010 by noroof4wimax July 28, 2010 Dear Mikkel and members of West Valley Presbyterian Church, I was disappointed that I did not see a representative of the church this evening at the Cupertino Planning Commission Meeting regarding the installation of the WiMax Antennae. Brad Head, representing Clearwire, was present and the engineering firm was present to hear our concerns but we were hoping to present our concerns to a representative of the church. It has been disappointing that the church has not been more open to hearing our concerns and has removed itself from any connection to the neighbors in this process. A group of neighbors would like to meet with you and your pastor to be able to discuss the concerns we have about the tower before the City Council Meeting on Tuesday, August 3rd. I would like to present to you a petition that has been signed by 113 neighbors asking you and the church to reconsider the installation of the WiMax antennae. We had over 30 neighbors who attended the meeting tonight and many were extremely upset about the antenna being installed at West Valley Pres. I hope you will look at the planning commission meeting, as it is televised on the City channel and it is also available online in the city archives. We were also disappointed that the applicant did not allow us to have the hearing when parents of students from Hyde Middle School could be notified. I understand that you are very busy, so we are willing to come to the church on Sunday to meet with you. Please let me know as soon as possible so I can let my neighbors know the time to come. I look forward to hearing from you. Please feel free to call me. Regards, Ione Yuen Posted in Uncategorized Leave a Comment » 2 , IBIT �I s. • Site Management Register • Log in • Entries RSS • Comments RSS • WordPress.com • Email Subscription Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Sign me up! • Recent Posts • Church WiMax Planning Commission Meeting on Monday night • Received a call from the Church l,rr„• / /nnrnnfd�ximay wnrrdnrecs.com/ 8/2/2010 NO Roof for WiMAX Antenna Page 5 of 5 • Petition on San Jose Mercury News Paper • Next Steps for WiMax antennae issue • The petition to: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino • New Flyer for neighbors • A letter from Ione Yuen ... Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Mistylook by Sadish. !i httn / /nnrnnf4wimax wordnress.com/ 8/2/2010 cc /8 -3 -/D l( Linda Lagergren From: Kevin [rseascape @gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 8:04 PM To: Kris Wang; Gilbert Wong; Orrin Mahoney; Mark Santoro; Barry Chang; Cupertino City Manager's Office Cc: Brendan Lahiff; Doug Thompson; Anshuman Nadkarni; Jason and Jane Cu; Dennis Shafer Subject: ry you deny lation WVC Prima Reason ou must den Fa la d imp Ante - Bollinger /Miller Location. Dear City Council Members, City Manager, Its no secret that the residents of the neighborhoods surrounding the West Valley Presbyterian Church are vehemently opposed to the installation of the ClearWire Wimax antenna. While I have read the FCC guidelines and understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only. That being the case, I submit that the installation is less than a legal matter and more a hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a stand alone fixture. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the church given the fact that it is fake! It is merely a ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. It is significantly larger by scale than needed as a bell enclosure. I believe that this should not only be denied for its deliberate deception imposed to get it to "PASS" muster through the city proceedings, but the fact that it must be disguised is Mens rea on the part of the City of Cupertino and Clearwire. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline is a fraud that the people of the neighborhood can legally and in good conscience pursue in the event that health and safety concerns manifest themselves appropriately to demonstrate that the installation is indeed responsible. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the the Church be designated a Historical Building and be subject to strict code enforcement. I also believe that the democratic process in the City will have failed the people of Cupertino by perpetuating this kind of fraudulent and misleading way of doing business in the future. You are Public Servants to the citizens of Cupertino, not a corporation. The people spoke and you did not listen. Find a way to put it somewhere legitimate without having to disguise it as something it is not. Cancer in a box near school children is still Cancer in a box near school children. It does not make a difference how nice a Faux Cupola looks when it is a fraud to disguise dangerous new and untested technology. The fact that the site was even considered is mind boggling given the attraction to Cupertino Schools. You are really out of touch with the people of this city! Thank You, Kevin Reed POA, Janet C. Reed 1 6276 Shadygrove Court. Cupertino Ca 95014 To all those CC'd, Please show up and voice your opinion August 3rd, @645 PM at the City Council Meeting. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e -mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e -mail if you have received this e -mail by mistake and delete this e -mail from your system. EX H B Cc /8 -3 -'o it I/ Linda Lagergren From: Kevin [rseascape @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 02, 2010 1:48 AM To: Kris Wang; Gilbert Wong; Orrin Mahoney; Mark Santoro; Barry Chang; Cupertino City Manager's Office Subject: Protest Form: Brendan and Lorinda Lahiff attached Attachments: Wimax Protest - Brendan Lahiff- Lorinda Lahiff.pdf Unable to attend the City Council meeting on August 3, 2010, My neighbor, Brendan Lahiff, has asked me to scan and forward this to you ahead of time. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e -mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e -mail if you have received this e -mail by mistake and delete this e -mail from your system. E i 7 . r. 1 cc /8- 3- #v' To City of Cupertino City Council Members, EXHIBI August 3, 2010 Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church To.: City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax c ntennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the church given the fact that it is fake, and it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actua bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly lamer by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- cpposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a re >ult of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road/ Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino Cupertino Resident and Homeowner t �` Witness • \ i 61 $4 5 ' ExHIBIT To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino C G / 8 - 3 - l b 1 Tone Yuen We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us arid our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature / ,! " `/vC1 _,.J 6- 3z /)7ye:74.E c Jav) 3 nikftWise-4C6D $0 la,' Cf( UKC /aliek 01( A 554. Ablito ( e- 36) , )14 1 416 1-)cy IP _ G 6 ' / 1 -) U I S IU BSc / a Sy r /� L —� )"? (1 Hyy t,&)i'od ; KE l I,E`( fERR61 691 J MIRTIE VADO DR, 64_32 Mriaa J L riv c i37 66/127/N6cOooD /-2( ,444),4,< f') 14 r1 O : S . 9/3 '%/ ?ice Ave To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature N (. r atiNDI/If 717 177LL (4101) 4- 1 Tr" C OLE Liu 0 0 y L MAD ilUg.( AIL CUPL-gr iNi0 -- ( 1 (Ai c trldl-eict Pv- MI SUN 00 cukfJyo 1 173 i\ / 7 1 1 ),4 1 \ 6 35 _a 414_ c k hJ Do. --tit„a/c 6 3t1 A ( c riW I ccA-kotei A•te kcpv 4 115aCotAtilittolzA TO N9tclo A') , Q tx tr) cANDLE-0-0.0 iptE- Ar aitIvkAic 177 . 1A- -- 171 tee 1 35 wtio (91(f sL ( / , 1 - kg ) cL Nt, 1 5' c ‘- 1. To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Add ress Signature q0�} N c.z; y4 oz,A AN P._ KO: 0' K F -�� c �A Q f‘ c,■ 9 5 Q 4/ a 130 j0. Sa'} i S h 90 z BI az i n woe/ Ave 56,„„vvIt - c/vtl G9 - 9 St /11 `�� l7 e e G(� o � 8q 4 (3 (ar �' n PtA� i ?ert z no i" A a 5n� '7t4 .� kl dv �U 88z 61 Cn r,3 o 7o c —� 1-t N ��. Cj.- - j. -6„.0, ( 0. 9d-t /t .1 j'I `J(1/1cQ �(�G5t7�1 nipei -/' t7 L1 '7 c7/ 11 g77' il(az, ;ti�od Ave -(z CNEA' CHEN jk7 LJ. eqgs 6 e/ t4M Cerhe 4// Zacr/ To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature ' IR ` 4 NI N^l 4P4)— C- p� di , ,; kk L—, -o k ' (L,j-iwc' 5o9 (.....it.„ Le____._. C ' "1 t,, 0 qs i 63 '1 YolocPwLud (4, .O ()'' Lee Cc e� et 90 qs of c,L �/ � 4 � t ; id(wt) b ` ci Ca., -E1c-04-tr) Lt_ I C fr c,-;(.. i,). , t_ / is vat 6e,/fr cn. ,./,.-- (cl\Q--: 7Dt_,\--)v-, L ,---, CAF ( _ � .p 11 ' ` (,f VILt(a)vivet !ry) P.. O ./� Awl l � �W Ok ckelz„ \h„, c , ( 7:)...,,,----e--_______ ____-------- 1 " Zvi € s 104/2_C.vrc ,s, :3)v . 1 r J � , . Pow * - CV- t b38z C`-a, Pr , h7 , ' '— Lk 1 CIA 0,0 .'- . 2-7--C---eL--,— To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Churc: until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature 1 LV € S... " LitVil '- x rf ►m (M? (7 ). ai t-- --- 0 y;l.:■ i IA ' C:. t1v\, CA t Jdam ,1 �, � `6(1 (V ,11c,. -- .,),Q__ y u, ,c�,,, r—(A4.,; §' ,`'. 1 / (, 7 � � , 1 I � (0SJ LOt? S *5 yBG� 'milticzP_ , ;) - ' Tu sTd I C L) Q i N v Cb `jS � O S � l 3 oriille.„ 6 v c g - J Rid t?; WI( w A VQ zRztAzAl I j S ut,y t\1 z.kil q 7i 21,I / e -- -�;` , C<{ -t t it- 6de- rkm f b-e C( yy ..5 ,et ilk_ _ y ,/y <'iiaL c&Sk eM, 9 ■ Ai Ile{ &\/ect cAaS\c'a11 L` 51 q.-t-L / - 4 7, To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a ri.sw technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature II H‘ fear (Aue... W 'v'-it f,J �/� ./ - di CJV cut, 3/2 mac. (' 1(..o-y Aux, Glut'/��, 7 c /1PAfpA'/.er Dthc, w\c (9-Rn>\\f\aiL9,4\Q , , J 7 ii doAleY -- — Hi , ( ( a - 4 ! / e ' goy Sre /Vera. Li G� -- 0 01 , 4 ?/eatical i / , i � 4i j Tamer (ZL" CLI6firuvl. Cf" .2 7-: / /,,,, -..- --- -- , „ 4€24#3\s) cii,a t-ive 4- 2 0 R - ` s Cli Over 4 4;d c-,2- ,S1-). ct ,,,., c,i, To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address 1 Signature 4 ; 41,i & /2/ . ca - it __) ► _-_ _cs 9> - - — =y c7 � f tit tid) 1.0-0 y57 /7/z_z_e.-:' ... , e _ i C ( if e CI f f 1 6' t9 r- D ifj. -f ‘1 1 t..a.,( C.,k,Jee.raii,* cl c 61 4- ' ?U' n '` �Q� 9 ? J / c A -) AR" ZS / PL ,0 .e2 4;r1.0 (A 460 i :iii,..,.______- ell 3;14 I i1 61,,kictel Tor& (K--C, atteirt(IN) 9 SO( LS -1/----- " V4 9 G1 n n V Y - L a ENA P - I e n ' 1 6J S ' .v p n to ) cA 'D (L { �r i am it ii / I'7) <S v�' • l /S J 1_ Ws Ck.Y copPA (i.-k. (--- q so i9 x ‘p-aivt41 - 2_,R i t A 9 ' -- c L i0v\ c G C Qeo to"5 ASS � I �z L I , j'�� 1 S3 0 ! / s.r ,% — J 3 Min 11,,, ►-e- . - 1 s I� 5'6- h'i G1\ r^ Mi cc? (' r4- LA i To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature P ak_cl PIA ciL) I 0 8 7 4-6 . (011 c,)‘ foesoet-d-) 6Trid • $e(41,,iJ) ! cb ; 1,)09, tiw.62.[Tc_v-A 6114 r7> 061 - . - I M o k) 16-14 �� �-J / -e * /7EL(5 Bit 40kwerdb,e, Locv Ok weci-Ar4 Dr 0 iMatielorlabo- 1i" GA-0\0,AL Ce.) :";? CAS)lt3OV tY- k G) A : \ r QV! Coo oh Joo( Or q To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature go I 1 1■141 air r i . D . . S 64_2 c 6 )) . P 1 ot i ,, , n I, er ,... ?Ai (il Al 1eitc7' ..... ... r . i , .. ; c , oil \- ' 1 ,./ c 14 o i ( , / ' ,-----) *ft Ail I, < ,....L,-- Li .1 •} ---, . ----- , .7) 'k - cA c Gx.,,,,7/ , . 3 0 , r , Caro I 1 pcH , -k i' a-AA g'' I : 1 .„.. c ) . I To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Si nat re f cJ ' 1 131 (li CI 3 ,(— ktf03 4( ' I day/ t Yu ait ,. i , y—_ To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature 6 35 m Dr Aj y e rl C,,eets-t:60. C `7sz4 I 1020 Cr&3 c �r SA-4( im'1R , 9.l f C:27 .� ti S'a7■ JeS (It 4 G ti f L / ' u-A- /o I CrCUAA' 41/ 7 '� / '� / /'J / A6 ,4/ (,C51/dig To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature R,2 Canclitocci CI" G21rY1C? NI c cu CA - ( �I G Ai'he 1A)acT& i � • �, r To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature (;SSZ (�.� J wP r . * t 1 Vka cc r fi /I C (best-)- (`bA K,,,,c o f ) ,/ r\I e V---0AAJ To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature A 62“5 -zi M , (_.T\ To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address -1 Si ■ attire D To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature t ei e r Woo/louse SI a ti-ycie a v 6 rat 1 Zullo - o-egiaz e , 1, Fhi 9t......... ci...n ,•--, 0 A.-'-`' c pi N a c d v ,,. Li I Ai, !(,,. ALA\ : cm., c Lc c 6,4 Cu Prz , z 7 f A(c5 (ti ?,,--:;(7 IL?: i / ZH ---y_ - ' 7 7 t , \ , JI A i ' 4. - . • — iVr AQQ. -k- A coli eh-, i II A, /1 V ,, -> -h v.e> le ( 6 ctA LVot .._,.... ..- i ( To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature b3 (07 6611,Pr r /20ad i AfP7doe ge n &-c.P (0'365- Bo R N MQpi,k)c. (b X cufbchAz ,0\ cts L 1 4 Zavvve 69 /7 6 7 7(, - 9 6 'r&iT R9 - 7.--- e? ( - 1 7 -:.-' 7 5 0SrM,N (fl?4 C ,„,,,,-4,0 , L 4 cf 50( ' - . iSetim Gr ki) 636J & &ii, r kr o fly 47 i4 / /zo !tiA m G-s s I RO( h._,_- J -1--e_0,-1# 6 jf) -- 404//pe,---",e- L i, / / y,j 6 36 41 8011,' r id ,„ -' , na • 1 4 . i „.„ ..... _,.. a -(,), . n i crti- 63 &o &L0; -e✓ t_ci 7 ,,, ).-_, --.■ -:-,-.15M. J ✓ c9(4 u,ett,kir, �^ Esc �, v)(-{- To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Sig9tture , LA-2/ 5 *-G/L6e[ A ( 0 5Ieti 1 L ' et n _ , (',4 q tp lq- .; -Itf° (-- / 6 2_, c- 3 ,) h$ kAA Yvl, co 4, 4 r V' ilA,A2 / C ci 0 1 4 4, _ • ''C . (02G4 Sic.cl 0- (....■.- 7 - ),i()r,(00..4?-14,u( C_ Ic. C't -trIti • - Pp . v4.601 dr-to- ) `--- , ,_. ci•-1>?',--'7'6-t-1/1 aqk kk, L 1) elq.)14 L.-0( ,, - 3 G, 0 \f-N k--- r>eur' 6, L6J,', C (-2 r p k ( u, Lc, p._ v.„2._ 1 .,_. 1 . ,,, (- A cy ---,(,0 r W7117)0g' A 4 X i 7 Au . i • , ,i ea., r (AP:7 0/ t2 1 f To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature h 3 rliti d9r- fie , Cho Cki244, /JA►.16 coue e (1G, ct,s- ry),1 )ev AuLt_ PcC \ l SCI% / 0 - 6 4"tHJev ( J`e -A- Qg 4 7 1 11/ 'spc 2ige S. ( 1 / i? 2 E_ �. rYoct -Toy S 3/0407-114 (v im{- y ou` 0 RN ,.- �/(/(1 L 0K 77' G cam'2 1 1ilkr �� ]o Skull bin m t?(Q A 4u-e To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature //_� ILt/ M, lie Zecijk Y p Spy �'"" PA Dm A Ao 2 3 7c-C (iC 5/ 4 6iPeerci 0“,per/i /)/ki y vare, -Dcwiflakt. 9o. - M.A." az,L.c.iezi_t_o otoi v\A, C 0 rte+ 1 Sbl 4 -- 4 1-- `" � —►�, t c� rs77 /7 a - M KoAk c 9,1 74> (e) gQ 5 rvt,1()z-, Je1Ao b1e)r - ci - CA q JP 6 -Z■e(iSj" � WOV \ LIV11 tiL El U4w1-- kv-E Cufabt>tv c A tviut To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature V. , 61 ;• 1 6wt'� `_- ' � g - cat �_S �z- . ,r v,) ,�s€ c_ A �2 4_ ( 6113 CQSk1; V QV k _Sck v\1oSC C4 ck5∎Zol A_ eeic � r Q Ici,u47 6/ 0 Ca 0 ki(cfr,-( i g p / 90 1 fir CI! % L-Loi / -,)dge 1).7 7_6 Pn')( ( V\6 Gak Q:- D(. , Ci- _• n✓/ L ME' d F e,lki,, , t, C o 1 6 e(vb i - r o (, CIA 6 60 93 /z" z--k6 do,: ((t. ti taik, 6 o 1 Z c6 2 4)4 r. Sr4Kit441-1/) To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature 7 T (, skin 1, 6t- l I , 96 A. vt c, _19 Lt. vt./..:L 4j e:( - I To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature 4 A pp 412 (L “17 e A- ' 4 _ i s ,' ' 1° m�. /tt ,�� (�7. k / Al f a, J� ,� <,( A r f ., ( / 1 , 1 Otuner = Linda, , '„ Shen -Jar1g ' ` 1 n1 - 91i in r � , ■ 1 le AlAtli6-995k,f-Kliltenty To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMA is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature Le CO/code 617/ Ocgdce'l 3b s" Ca CAArkik40 so 1#0\ 7,41e41% O' car-1A-Ad 6 Potv,./ /4.Th galWir 616 O t.„,50 c, y z Uzi Curt rc pv c, cAk 966,4 \( kit � 3 .Nb U� t∎VOPD . 11 (2 1 4- 1 6 4C,"- - f l 7z,o. CAli -brcC C L To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient studies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. Name Address Signature c f' " quo f-(1 A-z-z-p-Or-R, 9,ccickr(WiooD j)A g ,110, og„, ‘?tiaxiitit- s 6 (14..4-x-ctieweAnct - 1 L. C7 uw 1 l'kcle taped 7.cyc2_,1_,00 Wen -- Yeh O C? e ' , 9x-e/ To: West Valley Presbyterian Church and City of Cupertino We respectfully request that you please reconsider the installation of the WiMax Antennae at West Valley Presbyterian Church until there are sufficient saidies to determine that the radiation produced by the antennae will have no detrimental effects to us and our children. Since WiMax is such a new technology, we are concerned that there are no studies on its effects. Thank you. T r Name Address Signature � oca 1071- I yob i r`-" PY � / F, r, i , 7 sh h 7� 7 �� t S ' ; ' ... 7 n, 4 ---- ' -=- ----' ,\ ) cu,tyavk •--akt.x, sat, p ; c i g74 13 Lq Z /,r7roo00D u ° ( om P*/et I I � I I I 7:411 T cc B 5 - at 0 . B 7 :/o r l To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary furction is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and mi submitted in person to the City Coun it on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino VYdOYi ! t - Cupertino Resident and Homeowner - - ---- - - -- Witness HI Bi _No . .! cc /8- 3 -0 .ti/ q :i5 prt To City of Cupertino City Council E, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in pers, n to th Coun • o August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino `then 5-11,-----1-- - - - -• - - Cuperti»o Resident and Homeowner i �: ----7 J/ T- — '�- - -- — - ,-- 'Wi tness 6 - 6 /e -3,io di ll To City of Cupertino City Council Members, /0 , 3 U 10 III August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and s bmitted in person to the City Cou cil on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino — 0 3(00 VYl f e Dr:, eti ' CA- gaol - ~ P -- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- Cu rt rt.� Resident and Homlowner 7 4.t4__ -~ __ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ------------ Witness .�— ‘z_'e1 z) To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no otter function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideliie was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code - forcement as such. Signed, end bmit ed in rr oon th City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino - -- �� Cupertino Resident nd Homeowner a Witness 1 CC (#3/0 X 11 To City of Cupertino City Council Members, EXHIBIT August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active m crowave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, bat for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation uider the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submit jn .o.nto t-he ity Council on Augus 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino - 4 :--Q ClL . Cupertino Resident and Homeowner Witness CC—/B # 1/ To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 -" Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley F resbyterian Church To: City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixt ure. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the church given the fact that it is fake, and it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- Dpposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of th Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, an submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino ( Cupertino Resident and Homeowner f "" Witness ?.4 ( Fey 1'1 yr6Je ()v (ulec(t To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino Cupertino Resident and Homeowner Witness � 7 ; i To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To:.City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason th t the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola. proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). Iti serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scaie than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation u nder the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signe and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino I��� j Cupertino Resident and Homeowner — ` , , - - Witness To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To:.City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason th t the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). III serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino 6 2 3 S-11 /s U `f s1 \ ' �= t r �� Cupertino Resident and Homeowner • - - -- — '--- °-- Witness r,��` ,vp j_A To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To:.City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason th t the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such Sig , ands ed in person to t e City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino + Resident and Homeowner 46151 0415 --1 -- -- Witness L.t l To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino _ _-- -- Cupertino Resident and Homeowner `c z/o ff )4. -- Witness 61? '7/' / c To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. 4 Signedd submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino - � 1. '_ - Z LIi Cupertino Resident and Homeowner y lei -.(s,!: Witness 6 3 .: (37- ! °.' :_ i 4 i ' To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regard ess of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, a d subm' -d in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino _ - 11011. Cupertino Resident and Homeowner - -- i l i ---- ), c Witness 9 13 5I ,71,>10 , To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefu ly engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies; against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010 in t he City of Cupertino Sly a -, � k. `3 C A. Jl) JoO» C .1/ Cupertino Resident and Homeowner Witness To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fix':ure. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regard less of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Si_: • - d submitted i person o the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino at,14Nw‘. t Cupertino Resident and Homeowner -- Witness To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstratian of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino I q t� C r � �� - --- �- 1.���� f' - r�1- u�- �- (- ��:�= ��.� -k� Cupertino esident and Homeowner fi To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To:.City of Cupertino City Council, am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason th t the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns/rea sons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). I serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neigh borhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person t the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino -- f S • -- - - - - - -- Cupertino Resident and Homeowner Witness �/� 1 M I I er Avg. Cup 2.r +� ► �e� LC q so I Li To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, bui: for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council ugust 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino Cupertino Resident and Homeowner C j 36 20 f / > j Witness To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, b ut for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstra':ion of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyi:erian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforce ent as such. Signed, nd ubmitted in erson to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino 1 / 0 Cupertino Resident and Homeowner R yr -tl -e `oa,c1 0 Witness To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the year's during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Sign -• a d submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino g3/ =-� `? -- - - - Cupertino Resident and Homeowner -- / ni - - -- - - -___ --------- - - - - -- Witness 3 To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary fur ction is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster throug'i the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino Cupertino Resident and Homeowner ------- - -•ka� -- -- Witness 7' 33 J c. To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster througi the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino t_� •.J Cupertino Resident and Homeowner y ------------- __—=-------- - - - - -- Witness To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the year during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installatic n of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino a 4 �� d. _ - Cupertino Resident and Homeowner -- --- �r-- �+�------- - - - - -- Witness ■✓ To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church To: City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the church given the fact that it is fake, and it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy t:o disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that: is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino Cupertino Resident and Homeowner ? - Witness ri" /� To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixtL re. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, bur: for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino fliu„.„.. Cup E�rtino Resident and Homeowner Witness To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years; during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Hist3rical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino y► Cupertino Resident and Homeowner - ' Witness To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, bu: for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies, against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino Cupertino Resident and Homeowner Witness 10 77j .3ro ! ( fir - cL/a,r (4 IV- To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax a itennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to arrend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectura element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino Cupertino Resident and Homeowner Witness /07 13 o W w( D,..._ • cA-f 9t-0/9_ To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for ,aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesi:hetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino Cupertino Resident and Homeowner p Witness /0SA VA- AJ,&�./' .,DR. S,9,V' J S' i To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to arr end and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino Cupertino Resident and Homeowner .` '� ►�L��� _.. Witness To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for ,aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normal y be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino __ ____ ____________________ Cupertino Resident and Homeowner —-E Witness :h' " R (fi d To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino � !> _ -, Cupertino esident and Homeowner -- _____----------------- - - - - -- Witness To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normal y be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino C ` ,,L --`- Cupertino Resident and Homeowner Witness To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupoa proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active mic transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and s bmitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino ;, 1 �`"'` Cupertino Resident and Homeowner witness To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino ^ = `j' �� Cupertino Resident and Homeowner r te. - - - - - -- Witness / / 1 4L ,s, o- �- r 9 ,/ To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino j' � '*i ____-__ Cupertino Resident and Homeowner - , ---- a--------- ___------ - - - - -- Witness ( To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church To: City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary fund :ion is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the church given the fact that it is fake, and it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels .a nd maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual Dell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submi din +erson tot City o gust 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino Cupertino Resident and Homeowner ti Witness �� , 1 To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectura element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installatior of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino E c Wt, -w--. Cupertino Resident and Homeowner r Witness To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for ;aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupo a proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino , 7/ - - -i Cupertino Resident and Homeowner 43/ 1, *,,,d Witness To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, aryd person to the OA/ Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino 7" - -- - - -- Cupertino Resident and Homeowner r Witness a To City of Cupertino City Council Members, August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax z ntennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixture. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstration of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Signed, and submitted in person to the City Council on August 3, 2010, in the City of Cupertino Cupertino Resident and Homeowner Witness CC- X8. —✓d To City of Cupertino City Council Members, i' August 3, 2010 City Council Meeting, 6:45 PM. City Council Chambers opposite the Library Re: City Council Meeting; Wimax Antennae @ West Valley Presbyterian Church, 6191 Bollinger Road To: City of Cupertino City Council, I am opposed to the installation of the Clearwire Wimax antennae. I understand that the only reason that the City of Cupertino City Council can deny the installation is for aesthetic reasons only, not health concerns /reasons. That being the case, I submit that the installation is a carefully engineered hoax to get the antenna in the location whereas it clearly would not be allowed as a standalone fixi:ure. I submit the following protest. A Cupola is a common church - architectural addition to amend and compliment the function of the church. It normally acts as a belfry and /or a belvedere. Its primary function is to house the church bell to summon people to worship their faith, or act as a lookout. In this case, the Cupola proposed is a Faux Cupola (Fake CUPOLA). It serves no function that is architecturally appropriate to the neighborhood or the Presbyterian Church given the fact that it is admittedly fake, and that it was not installed in the years during subsequent remodels and maintenance by the West Valley Presbyterian Church as a functional architectural element. I submit that it is merely a cleverly engineered ploy to disguise the dangerous Wimax active microwave transmitter /receiver antennae for a location installation that is desirable to the Wimax function. Regardless of the health risk, I have reviewed the proposed Faux Cupola design and feel that is larger than would normally be installed as a normal and authentic cupola housing an actual bell for the intended purpose in which a cupola is an architectural element of a church. I feel it is significantly larger by scale than needed as merely decorative cupola enclosure serving no other function. I believe that this should not only be denied for aesthetic reasons, but for its deliberate deception as an architectural element specific to a church to get it to pass muster through the City of Cupertino's proceedings for approval. I feel that the fact that it must be disguised is a clear demonstrat on of Mens rea on the part of Clearwire and the City of Cupertino Planning Commission. I believe the installation under the currently proposed installation guideline was carefully engineered in such a way to go un- opposed. I hereby submit formally and in writing my protest for the record . I also reserve the right to pursue any legal remedies against The City of Cupertino and Clearwire for future injuries /damages that may arise as a result of the installation of the antennae at West Valley Church on Bollinger Road /Miller Avenue. I respectfully request that you deny the installation of the Clearwire Wimax Antennae located on the Roof in a Faux Cupola at the West Valley Presbyterian Church at 6191 Bollinger Road, the corner of Bollinger Road and Miller Avenue based on /for aesthetic and /or architectural reasons. I also respectfully request the Church be designated a Historical Cupertino Structure and be subject to strict code enforcement as such. Si ed, and s r' ed in person to the City Co cil on Au ust , 2010, JJ'n the City of Cupertino 4,3 4.0 kir wvo c� '` L � v Ai-. o ` C4- 1St /`T Cupertino Resideht and Homeowner __�� -- -� -��- - -� -- -- - - -� -- Witness --...— (47/1