The URL can be used to link to this page

.02 U-2010-03 Dave Yocke/AT&T OFFICE OF COMMLrNITY DEVELOPMENT ' � � CTTY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENiJE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 C V P E RT 1 N 4 � `�8� �-3308 • FAX (408) 777-3333 • planning�cupertino.org PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. � Agenda Date: September 14, 2010 Application: U-2010-03, EXC-2010-�)4, TR-2010-31 Applicant: Dave Yocke, Trillium Telecom (for AT&T Mobility) Property Owner: ECI Two Results, LLC Property Location: Results Way Application Summary: Use Permit (U-2010-03) request to allow a personal wireless service facility, consisting of twelve panel antennas mounted on a 74-foot tall monopine and associated base equipment located at the Results Way offic�e park. Height Exception (EXC-2010-04) request tc� allow antennas to be mounted on a monopine at a height of 67 feet or less whE re 55 feet is allowed. Tree Removal (TR-2010-31) request to allo�v the removal and replacement of four Coastal Redwood trees associated with thE� proposed personal wireless service facility. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Cominission: 1. Approve the use permit (U-2010-03;� with additional design conditions per the model resolution; 2. Approve the height exception (EXC-2010-04) per the model resolution; and 3. Approve the tree removal (TR-2010��31) per the model resolution (Attachment 1). PROjECT DATA Property Zoning: Planned Developmer_t - Light Industrial - P(ML) Allowed Height: 55 feet Height of Monopine: 74 feet (measured frc�m grade to foliage top) Height of Antennas: 67 feet max. (measurE�d from grade to top of panels) Required Setback: 75 feet (to residentiall y zoned property line) Proposed Setback: 334 feet to Imperial Ave. residence ;?-1 Dave Yocke (for AT&T Mobility) U-2010-03, EXC-2010-04 SeptemUer 14, 2010 Page 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- " 246 feet to Olive Ave. residence 207 feet to Astoria townhouses Environmental Determination: Categorical Exemption BACKGROUND Proposed Project The applicant, Dave Yocke (representing AT&T Mobility) is proposing a personal wireless service monopine located in the westerly landscape strip of the rear parking lot of the Results Way Office Park (see aerial diagram Uelow). The monopine consists of twelve panel antennas arranged in two racks of six antennas on a simulated pine tree pole. Associated base equipments are located within a fenced enclosure near the base of the pole. The monopine will be designed for collocation so that more antennas and base equipment may be added by other wireless carriers in the future. Any future addition to the monopine will require additional radio frequency energy analysis to confirm that the cumulative emission exposures are below Federal safety limits. The project site is surrounded by mainly office and industrial land uses. The nearest residential property is approximately 207 feet to the north. .�: � _ . � � �� ' �` � j ro �'�►� � . s . � �.,. � ? :� :.;:,: _�.,. � ..,_ �-� �. '�'� E�,.�'��"� �_3 �.,.. ��y ;:. � J+'�"ti1 w ., .�� r. '��. J;' �. -+n..r r •� � S' t •�... . �'ti. 1 � , `+ .�� ' �y j � 6 r � y • �.� �i �� i. w 1 . „ t*` �� ...r�� r . . 't �� r � ,, . W i t W � � ' � t. �'�` ` � ��' � � �• � ' � � ' � ! � u � � �i �'.`' 4 � �� "' i � � � ` � �aC � +� iy ,; , � Z y Q � Y � �[� ,,�a � f��:� � R �,,,��p !�; t ,� M .. � �� ► �'' �.�. �. � � r � '/� � �_ � � �' . , i r' �►' �>_ ". � I k _ . r ` '.. i �,. ' � �.�! m � t �` �� m � � f Y ,,, � , :�.. :. � _ _ _-- �, '�, 1 .�.r...f� , r�. - �. . �. ,' ' ; `� � �R7��d /� ��7E. ` ' �.-� � . • . , C .. j'. . \ � � �'iv.. '! r. , ' .�` � � �-,�� P�� s,...� �irsa:. * � t� �,. • ' ,F a� , 4 �� Z �. M� I _ ' �. . . � '�'. ,. .. _. � � � I � •- :� e . r `' _ .� f+ 4 :; . f � !�' ,: I 4 � ' ti � � �'1 �. k'Q"'fs �� t ",;' �� y � r � � � ►! L` r . � � Y M � b .-a � � � �' * ' �' ' f , ' w P � .� �� • � �� r F "" �""• � ws„' J . K.. � ��t - ,` t � �i' { . � r , _ ... _ . � � � � � • �-'� . � _ ` � +�• j , �1 °� S ,�� . R � � �� i � � �: � -� I E � �� : � � - #P�� '� � �� ... „�x �, ,,,:�..�.: _ '��:._"�'��.�:�.a4 a � � _, ,r� # ,.. � � � -- � ' ,4 � ; j � � �� : �. ,;� � ;,. �� , � , _ =' ;'�,�� J 7 p ►� � - t ' , -_1b� �. � � t � Y � � r � � - . � �, �'' � �� •'-t �1 I 'y�`-� f. EJ i � f a �� , . � J ,. � . � . .. � .. � � ` �a. I 1. � !�° l �� ' . � s '� ..�r r w � � . �! - � ' M� .� � l. _ tW. �.._ . _ �., � � •,�:; u_ . �r ��.Mf %'�:��. . AV�-_`�'o- �.k ...! � � ' y` `'� � �r �'� �'' �� .ac'. . �, I ,,.�;'r�._�y�.. • � � v � � + •�� j . � i � k � I'� � � � I � � �' � � _� -� � r �: � i "�' �� . � f � � ti . � �` �` ti ' -`"`=---" � — � �'� riz :;� t� .�� r" J � t ..'.a..' � "' �L _ _ .1� � T �4 � �' .�- --� � L � � � � � .' t � �,�' — . 4 , 1' � � � � ° 4 '�' 1 � x `s. r ir�� 4 # w. '�� '-•A � �M1 �_ — �t ` . " M � �p..� "`�,;� , , . �, 207 feet _ 1 ♦ �� 7 � , ii � - +� �" �' �..�:y� 1.., � - - ~� ,,�.. ZTy� "�..� . r^K.;: . � ��:� - �,' � �.� � .Ji � ' ��.jrr c . S.• .. ..'!s'� � _ i �� + � �.�_� �, , � ; � . � « �, � � 1, t� . � t i� � � � � � �._ � t � , _.. ir � d1w w . � . � , 4 ,y� _ . i� `�'�; � I e ��, .e i � � �; a " :.� � � "�. .'f� � � i •�: � :�..: y ; �r...�.... �� • uco�as � � ��' ^t � t.'.- � s � . �h.. � . � � J:9� � _ � �.r? ��r" . . - `� . . �{�t � � � ' y �' � • i � 7� � � .��a'k. t ,�'i � „� 14 �. � c iR`� a ` 1 � ,MA � Yr f � � , ti � � � � � � � r .�!_�!':�L!� s ' � ,..s� ,� ' ^""'u ,� . ._ ;: �� Y' � � �.� � .. ,'� � � . " t �� ,i � `� ��}' °��^"�+. � � � � dY R.�� : r � � � t "d � �: .. � , p�( � �3 � .. �� r , S Y f' 1� -��, �1 _ � � � :.�, . i.�y.J�''� �/'� �y ��. _ , , � i 2� . ,�+ � ��E r—� � � � � � � �cx � � �� R,��'� ..+ -* : t .� ° � . „�^ � , � _ ,� `'�` �' ' � � �� ` .. �. � , ( � � � 4 ° \�, , �,c� �, � �1� r � � � ��„ � � fi � �, t, � , • S _ . � + � a -...rw � � . Y" � �,�,,.: � �r� � � - � _ . . ,�. � r; �!� � � 0 �1:. �t. � +� �.r � - . .. �,. � ��w ;. Pro osed Location of AT&T mono ine � ,' 1 '°�' -�` �� :: �Ip,�l � � - �,, P I� , '� -_ • ., � r� ii.. .. :y, 1 -:,r. t � r �. �� '' �� ` � r. . � �,,.:�' r � - � '��'m. � : . „ � � w � �:� ' � a ;�. �"• � , � . ..�"` ` ,f ;��, r � ` � , �., � � � .�� :.w.�. � � . , � ^�+'� °� � 2 L', .� ,�°��, y - �' �s� — ,, .. Dave Yocke (for AT&T MoUility) U-2010-03, EXC-2010-04 September 14, 2010 Page 3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Previous Application Approximately one year ago, the Planning Commission reviewed a similar application (U-2008-03, EXC-2009-05) for a six-antenna monopine with provisions for a future expansion or collocation. That proposal was withdrawn when AT&T changed its applicant/contractor. The new applicant has suUmitted a new monopine proposal consisting of six more antennas (a total of 12) compared with the original application. The new monopine is located approximately 170 feet north of the original location on the same property Covera�e Dema��d In 2007, the City's Technology, Information and Communications Commission (TICC) conducted an on-line survey of residents and workers to identify cell phone usage and issues in the City. AT&T was found to be one of two wireless carriers to have the widest subscription bases in Cupertino, and the Bubb Road/McClellan Road area was identified as the # 1 problem area for lack of cell phone coverage by survey respondents. The existing and proposed AT&T phone coverages are depicted in Attachment 2. The Santa Clara County Sheriffs has also submitted a letter noting the importance of improving wireless communications coverage throughout the city in order to improve law enforcement communications and effectiveness (Attachment 3). DISCUSSION � Site Location The AT&T monopine is proposed in the westerly landscape strip of the office park which has numerous tall and large trees to the south and smaller trees to the north. The proposed location is 2.75 times the required 75-foot setback from a residentially zoned property. Tree�ole a��d Enclosure A�pearance ''� � The a earance of the mono ine will be ., `� .� pp p ' com arable to modern tree ole desi s, �y P P � � �-�- �, 4.,z�''' � ��,� �. �;� -� such as the one located at 10121 Miller i�•.'�: �r ';t?�wr. -' :� ��-:�� =' Avenue, Cupertino. The tree design :� ; � ,... ,,: �. �d . ��,�,� , . '� -r, '� �'-��- includes: 1. , r +�; ��• V'�'�L..� � . . .� . � . ��• � �`� 4� � � `',� • Faux bark cladding � � `� '�- � '� � �`�- y� • An artificial ine branch structure ; f � � p '' a`''h=`''e � � ',�' 1 , �:' ; ��. �,.�: � that will resemble a tree and oUscure ,,; ;� ,.,�� , the antenna racks "j Pine needle covers that will obscure - �;e,� .'� � . • '' �' �'��' �► � "� '' y �� ` ' the panel antenna even further (See �, �°'"�� `�g,�,`� � �� r., i�, .•� " Y M ; x � x � . hotosimulations Attachment 4 .�.:� � ��'�� p , ) �� F�� r .�� ,� � �' :: � �� ' ' � ' � Sample actual AT&T monopine proposed �'i' 2 � , , ��,c .; � °� �""'�`"�"'�" �� "'°'"�"°�'�' � �" ,� at Results Way, Cupertino ��: . - ,�� ;' � �, "ti" � �. � �e f� � ,:� • #_ t ` "� � :. , '�_�. � _ _... .._ 'i.A'Q : _ Dave Yocke (for AT&T Mobility) U-2� )10-03, EXC-2010-04 September 14, 2010 Page 4 Even though there are many tall, maturE trees in the office park's westerly landscape strip, the immediate project vicinity is occupied with smaller stature trees, which makes it more challenging to blend in the project In order to achieve a more natural and re alistic tree image and enhance the equipment screen wall (12-foot concrete block vw all), staff is recommending the following conditions of approval: • The needle camouflage shall be a mc�re mottled green color, which is more natural looking than the deep forest green cclor found on the Miller Avenue tree • The top half of the monopine shall t�e designed with a more conical form and the the bottom half of the tree foliage sllould be more dense in order to simulate the shape of a real pine tree • The upper six feet of the base eqL.ipment screen wall shall be clad with high quality metal panels with a color to match the metal work in the approved office project. Area around the enclosure shall be landscaped with shrubs to help the monopine blend in with the existing landscaping. Height Exception Request The applicant is proposing a maximum hE�ight of 67 feet for the antennas and 74 feet for the monopine, where 55 feet is allowed by the Wireless Ordinance. The extra height is needed because the rear grade of the office park is approximately 19 feet lower than the grade at McClellan Road. According to 19.108.100 of the City's Wireless Ordinance, an exception may be granted by the Commi�sion for an antenna exceeding the maximum height limit where practical difficulties e Kist. According to the applicant's engineer, given the project's unique topography, the antennas need the extra height to "see" over the tops of the adjacent office buildings tc provide phone coverage to the neighborhood to the south. The extra pole height is alse needed to allow for a potential collocation by another wireless carrier on the same pole. Staff supports the proposed height exception given the reasons mentioned above and the fact that the City has previously approved similar height requests for similar reasons. Radio Frec�uencU Ener� Assessment AT&T Mobility commissioned the pre�►aration of a radio frequency energy (RFE) assessment (Attachment 5) to determix►e the projected radio emission levels and compare them against the federal exposu:-e safety standards (that is, PCS: 1.0 mW/cmz; Cellular: 0.58 mW/cm The report concluded that the project is within the federal safety standards for RFE exposure with e�timated exposures as follows: 2-4 Dave Yocke (for AT&T Mobility) U-2i)10-03, EXC-2010-04 September 14, 2010 Page 5 RF Energy Exposure Context % of Maximum Permissible Exposure Ground level (AT&T facility only) 0.62% Ground level (AT&T & existing Sprint-Nextel) 0.75% Roof of Building to the west 3.2% 2na Floor Elevation of nearest residence 0.93 % It should be noted that per Federal law, local agencies are prohibited from regulating such facilities on the basis of the envirorunental effects of RF emissions if the emissions meet federal safety standards, such as stated above. Alternative Site AnalUsis Since 2005, AT&T/Cingular has sought to provide better wireless communications coverage to the Monta Vista area with the following outcomes: Site # Site Location Outcome 1 Monta Vista H.S. gymnasium E uilding-mounted antennas approved by F'lanning Commission in 2005. Later FUHSD 8� AT&T declined to proceed with lease due to arent o osition. 2 Lands of Union Pacific Rail C:ingular (purchased by AT&T) was interested Roads (UPRR) near Bubb Rd. i�t a monopine proposal. Appeal of C:ommission denial was withdrawn because conflict with SCVWD easement made project L ndevelo able. 3 Results Way frontage parking I::utia12008 AT&T proposal (file no. U-2008-03) lot near McClellan Road r�jected by staff because of lack of abutting l;�ndsca in and visibili to McClellan Road. 4 Results Way office building I)etermined to be infeasible by AT&T for lack roof near McClellan Road c f adequate building height & accessibility by service ersonnel. 5 Results Way east side of rear ]�etermined to be infeasible by property parking lot near UPRR c wner. Area planned for new underground railroad tracks. L_tilities (i.e. water, sewer & storm drainage) to serve a roved, future develo ment. 6 Results Way west side of rear F'roject was continued indefinitely by the parking lot near Imperial I'lanning Commission in 2009 because of Avenue (U-2008-03) c_isagreement between property owner and a pplicant. Project was later withdrawn when a pplicant changed. Site is located in a utility E asement. 7 Results Way westerly rear C:urrent proposal arkin lot near Im erial 2-5 Dave Yocke (for AT&T Mobility) U-2(�10-03, EXC-2010-04 September 14, 2010 Page 6 Avenue The above alternate sites were either rev iewed at a public meeting or discussed with staff in the context of project review. ThE�y are depicted on a map - see Attachment 6. The applicant has also look at other sites in the area and those are outlined in Attachment 7. Cornments from the TICC In accordance with the wireless communications facilities ordinance, the plans and supporting documentation were referred to designated members of the TICC. TICC provided the following comments (Attachment 8): • The RF study was properly done a nd demonstrates that RF exposures are below federal safety standards. (Staff notes: antennas are not proposed at 35 feet. This is a possible collocation opportuni .y that still must undergo IZF energy analysis when a proposal is submitted.) • The monopine design provides adequate camouflage for the cell tower. Its location in an office/industrial par:c will make it even less noticeable and should not adversely impact the neighborY.00d. • The facility will greatly benefit Ciipertino residents as this area is known as a major gap in AT&T's wireless cove rage of Cupertino. Public Hearin� NoticinQ The project property has not changed, so :he public hearing noticing has been mailed to the same property owners within 1,000-f��ot radius of the project property boundaries. An earlier courtesy notice was emailed ��n August 24, 2010 to interested parties who provided an email address on the former applications. Staff understands that AT&T has sent additional noticing to its customE rs in the area. Staff has received nearly forty email me� sages about this project. The majority of the writers support a new AT&T cell phone :ower in the Monta Vista area to improve cell phone coverage (Attachment 9). Tree Removal Four (4) six inch diameter Coastal Reciwoods in the westerly landscape strip are proposed for removal as part of the pr�ject. The removal of the four redwoods is necessary in order to facilitate the proposed monopole and associated base equipments/enclosure. Staff recommends that the four redwoods be replaced with three (3) new 24-inch box Coastal Redwo �ds planted in the northwest corner landscape strip. Staff is also recommending that the irrigation system be rehabilitated by the applicant to ensure that the new trees anc. the existing trees in this area thrive. 2-6 Dave Yocke (for AT&T Mobility) U-2 )10-03, EXC-2010-04 September 14, 2010 Page 7 Prepared by: Colin Jung AICP, Senior Planner Reviewed by �,pproved by , ; �.arti Shrivastava i y Planner C'ommunity Development Director ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Model resolutions i or U-2010-03, EXC-2010-04, TR-2010-31 Attachment 2: Existing & Propose 3 Coverage Maps Attachment 3: Santa Clara County Sheriff's letter dated June 23, 2010 Attachment 4: Photosimulations o E treepole (3) Attachment 5: Statement of Hamniett & Edison, Inc.: AT&T Mobility, Proposed Base Station (Site T�o. CN3242A), Results Way, Cupertino, California dated A�gust 20, 2010 Attachment 6: AT&T Facility Alte �nate Sites Aerial Map Attachment 7: Alternate Site Anal ysis provided by applicant Attachment 8: Communications fr om TIC Commissioners Attachment 9: Emails from reside:lts and workers in Cupertino Plan Set G:\Planning\PDREPORT\2010ureports\U-2010-�)3, EXC-2010-04, TR-2010-31.doc �—� Attachment 1 U-2010-03 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 T� �rre Avenue Cupertino, ( �alifornia 95014 RESOLI JTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMIS� ION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVNG A USE PERMIT TO ALLOi�V THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY, CON� ISTING OF A 74-FOOT TALL MONOPINE WITH TWELVE PANEL ANTENNAS ��ND ASSOCIATED BASE EQUIPMENT AT THE RESULTS � NAY OFFICE PARK SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notice s have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of CupE�rtino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matte: �; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the followin;; requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed lo �ation, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vici�uty, and will not be detrimental to the public - health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located an�i conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General F lan, the Wireless Facilities Master Plan, the Wireless Communications Facilities O��dinance and the purpose of this title. 3) That the operation of the facility will comply with federal safety standards for radio frequency radiation emissions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps. facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application f�r Use Permit is hereby approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this F:esolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and ?-8 Resolution No. U-:?010-03 September 14, 2010 Page 2 That the subconclusions upon which tr.e findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. U-2010-03 as set forth in the Minui:es of the Planning Commission Meeting of September 14, 2010 and are incorporated k�y reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: U-2010-03 Applicant: Dave Yocke (for AT& T Mobility) Property Owner: ECI Two Results, LLC' Location: Results Way SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINIST] �RED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on Exhibits titled: " at&t/CN3242-A/November Drive/Results Way/Cupertino, California 95014" prepared by Jeffrey Rome & Associates, Inc. dated OS/31/10 and consisting of six s:leets labeled T-1, A-0 through A-3, A-1.1 and C-1, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, R]�SERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation r�quirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1;i, these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. Yc�u are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Governrr.ent Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally ba rred from later challenging such exactions. 3. COLOCATION OF ANTENNAE The treepole shall be structurally d esigned to accommodate the collocation of additional antennae from other wirele �s carriers. The co-location agreement shall be at market rates with reasonable compE nsation to the mast owner. 4. ABANDONMENT If after installation, the aerial is not used for its permitted purpose for a continuous period of 18 months, said aerial an�� associated facilities shall be removed. The applicant shall bear the entire cost of 3emolition. 2-9 Resolution No. U-:?010-03 � September 14, 2010 Page 3 5. EXPIRATION DATE This use permit shall expire ten (10) ye �rs after the effective date of the permit. The applicant may apply for a renewal of the use permit at which time the Planning Commission may review the state of wireless communication technologies, camouflage techniques and maintenar_ce to determine if the visual impact of the aerial facility can be reduced. � 6. TREE POLE APPEARANCE AND MAl NTENANCE The applicant shall use a sufficient number of artificial branches to obscure the appearance of the panel antennae and �.ny associated mounting framework. The top portion of the tree pole shall have branches of varying length to give the tree pole a conical form. Panel antennae mounted away from the mast shall have needle covers to blend with the green foliage of the a�tificial branches. The mast shall be wrapped with a faux bark and any antenna mou nted close to the mast shall be painted brown to mimic a tree trunk. The foliage shall have a mottled green coloration. The building permit shall be review��d and approved to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director tc� ensure the above condition is met. The applicant shall perform regular mai:ztenance of the tree pole to maintain its appearance and obscure the panel anter�nae from public view. 7. EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE The base equipment enclosure shall be c�onstructed of high quality materials and/or be screened by appropriate landscaping as determined by the Director of Community Development. The final enclosure desi�m, wall treatment/color and screening strategy shall be reviewed and approve � by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of buildi ng permits. 8. TREE REPLACEMENT The removed trees are to be replaced w: th three (3) 24" box Coastal Redwoods in the northwest corner of the property. Final locations shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Developme:lt prior to issuance of building permits. Applicant shall provide a letter from a l�ndscape architect, certifying that the newly planted trees are in good health and the irrigation system is operating properly to maintain the trees. In addition, the final landscaping plan shall confirm that the existing irrigation systems are operatin�; properly in order to service the existing and new trees in the area. 9. TESTING OF RADIO FREQUENCY (RJi LEVELS Radio frequency levels will be monitorE d and tested annually for a period of three (3) years from the date of the final occupancy approval. The result of these tests will be made available to the Planning Departnlent and the FCC for review. The City 2-10 Resolution No. U-:'_010-03 September 14, 2010 Page 4 reserves the right to perform code enforcement actions and/or revoke this use permit if the results show RF levels inconsisten t with the federal standards. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day o:= September 2010, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupe��tino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava Paul Brophy, Chair Community Development Director Planning Commission G/planning/pdreport/res/�010/EXC-2010-03 res.doc 2-11 EXC-2010-04 CITY OF �UPERTINO 10300 Tc�rre Avenue Cupertino, ( �alifornia 95014 RESOLI JTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISS ION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A HEIGHT EXCEP'TION T O ALLOW ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED ON A MONOPINE AT A HEIGHT OF �,BOUT 67 FEET OR LESS ON A PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILI'7'Y LOCATED AT RESULTS WAY SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: EXC-2010-04 Applicant: Dave Yocke (for AT&T Mobility) Location: Results Way SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR EXCEPTIO �T WHEREAS, in order to provide height flexibility in situations where practical difficulties, unnecessary hardships or resL lts inconsistent with the purpose and intent of Chapter 19.108 occur, an applicant for development may file an exception request to seek approval to deviate from the standar �s; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission fi�ids the following with regards to the Height Exception for this application: 1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title in that the extra antenna height above the ordinance maximum of 55 i eet is needed because the monopine rests in a location below the grade of the neighborhood that will be serviced with telephone coverage. 2. That the proposed project will not be i ljurious to property or improvements in the area nor be materially detrimental to t:1e public health, safety, or welfare in that the wireless technology produces RF ener;,ry below federal exposure standards, and 3. That the proposed development will r ot create a hazardous condition for pedestrian or vehicular traffic because it is not �ited within the travel ways or sight lines of pedestrian or vehicular traffic. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, application no. �:XC-2010-04 is hereby approved; and i;-1 2 Resolution No. EXC-20�.0-04 September 14, 2010 Page 2 That the subconclusions upon which tr.e findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application EXC-2010-04, as set forth iri the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of Septer�ber 14, 2010, and are inc�orporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS AL�MINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on Exhibits titled: "at&t/ CN3242-A/ November Drive/ Results Way/Cupertino, California 95014" p:�epared by Jeffrey Rome & Associates, Inc. dated 08/ 31 / 10 and consisting of six � heets labeled T-1, A-0 through A-3, A-1.1 and C-1, except as may be amended by the �onditions contained in this resolution. 2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, R�;SERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation �•equirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of sucll fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may pr��test these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day ��eriod complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally ba:�red from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day o E September 2010, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupe��tino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava Paul Brophy, Chair Community Development Director Planning Commission g/planning/pdreport/res/Z009/EXC-2010-04 res.doc 2-13 � TR-2010-31 CITY OF �UPERTINO 10300 Tc�rre Avenue Cupertino, C;alifornia 95014 RESOLI JTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION O]� THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENr' OF UP TO FOUR COASTAL REDWOODS ASSOCIATED WITH THE INSTALLATIC>N OF A PROPOSED PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY AT THE R ESULTS WAY OFFICE COMPLEX SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TR-2010-31 Applicant: Dave Yocke (AT&T 1V_obility) Location: Results Way SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application to approve the removal of four Coastal Redwoods that are by an approved development plan considered protected trees subject to Chapter 14.18, the Protected Tree Ordinance of the City of Cupertino; a nd WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of CupE rtino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matte: �; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the Planning Cornmission finds: 1. That the aforementioned trees are i:1 conflict with the development proposal; 2. That the application for Tree Rem��val, file no. TR-2010-31, is hereby approved; and 3. That the subconclusions upon whic h the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and containe�� in the Public Hearing record, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Corrunission Meeting of September 14, 2010 are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINIST)�RED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 2-14 Resolution No. TR-2010-08 Apri113, 2010 Page 2 1. APPROVAL ACTION Approval is based on Exhibits titled: "at&t/CN3242-A/November Drive/Results Way/Cupertino, California 95014" p:-epared by Jeffrey Rome & Associates, Inc. dated 08/31/10 and consisting of two sheets labeled A-0 and A-1.1, except as may be amended by the conditions containE d in this resolution. 2. TREE REMOVAL & REPLACEMENT The removed trees are to be replaced with three 24" box Coastal Redwoods in the northwest corner of the property. Fir.al locations shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Develo��ment. Applicant shall provide a letter from a landscape architect, certifying that thE newly planted trees are in good health and the irrigation system is operating prop� �rly to maintain the trees. 3. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RF;SERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation rE�quirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. Yo u are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may prc�test these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Governm��nt Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day ��eriod complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally ba�•red from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14� day of September 2010, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupe rtino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava, Director Paul Brophy, Chair Community Development Department Planning Commission G: � Planning � PDREPORT � RES � 2010 � TR-2010-31 res.doc 2-15 ------- -- --- -- , --- -- _ — . __ � ��_� �� __ , ; ; � i � '. �, �h�{ aue� � `� -...... ._.-.._.. .... . p i --i -- -_ _ �� _ __— i ,� � .—,�� , � � _ ' p ~-- ---� - -- : , � �' . �i� ,� � __ _ __ _- ,� ____ � I I� ---- � �j - � -- _. ____ _ � �ti ; -- ' 0 M � _ .,� �'--� --------- O : - i O � =� � fi - . ,� i ~ . . .. . .. ,- . . . . . . , . .... � � I i . � Q � ��. l '7 ,. . . . ,.. ^ _ . . . t . .. � •.- r �_ - -'-- ... _ O � O � _ � � r r e�+� �� r � =� S'l�� AnZ.� B hr� u' °=J-- �� hti ( + 7 �'• r^- _ = - �.��- _ r �i"� -- �' O I--, �� C �'��' ii . ti - �_, � a � � _ ,- � ti � m I , :��':�"=�' 1 C17 ' - � � � �. .: . • � _ _ . -,� � � . - �, �_ _ _ _ � ;'� � c� _ � M - - --- � ---- I � Li. . , ._ .... ._ _ .. _..... ,._.-.-. . , .. . . . tl' '- _.. _. ' �. .�. .. . .... , . .... --- ---------� _ ( �' . . N - -- ,� �� , _ � � �_I H� ! , Z �� .. � .. .,,- .> . .._.... . . _ _._� .. _ _ . . , . . � .. W � �- ; �� ..� - '`�' � _ ►' ' � � .. ��. _ _ i i ; � � � � m ,� � - ' � _; ` U � � �i� I _ _ _ . � - - D c = U `-' - -- - ;� � �^C � � � � J� : '-- t .$ ; � � --=-- � �"� � � -;_ -� �cs�� --_ .� - _._ � , � . _ .. E""� . � _ _- _ _ __ � _ � , _ ��. - � � '. =-= -_ -- � ��-- - _ -- ,_ _ -�. ��'� � � �� T �_ �r_�_ �; r - � � ! .- _ � �--- - = - � , ; ,_--- , .� ; � � i � � �-� � � p q q n A ' � �_ � ' �i � - - �- - � --T-- , i � C�i'}. � ', ( i _ _ � I.. - - - - ' ''._ - i "_ Imp�ri�I �.�.� �, �- -- �ti� `� I _ � � �� - � - - �t. -�. ' i �- _ �� , _, }- � � _ r _ , v � � '----� '--- -;' _�:_. ,,� �,., �-�_ � ``, �, ' ``�-- - � � � —� - - �_ —1 � 1 r- I � � + �'�� _L � � � - - � � . I- � � _ -- � � �' -- � �- �- - - _ -_ _ � _ - - - _ _' ; � _ ',� . � ; ___ __� - -- ! �� • I� .. __ - �i � � -- _ _ I I � '� -� -- i --� - � -__ _ ,�= �•_ I -- ' ` _ - ;' '�� _ -�; � - - I - I _,'�` I _ , � ;- - � - -.,�� _ , �- -�- _ -- - --- - - ; , ---- -- - -_ _ - - _-_ -- � 1 � �'- �--- - � � � -� -� � --- , , . ., „ , - .- � I � _ !I ____ �' i� -- � -- � !� I�I� ��'�- - � � � _ � ; ; ' �: �'' i _1 c� ; ��1 � ' i a� � a� , I � ! �a o a� L- � ; .F - - I '� � � � — � - a� a� a� � ;� y � . - � �� a � a �-, '' - ��-� ' ' � Q V a - o c� o � - - `' ' � -a � i. � N � ��,� � � Q v O � N � Q � � m I � o j-- ' , - . . � � � � � �' 2 — � 6 -- , ,.. � , � � i i � -----..__...-- �--_ � � . _ ,� � �_� ""_.` i �h�( 2UB� 'c�'. �_ i � —_ -- � �� i , —,.; ._ _ . _ , � ' -- - �-_.._ � --- ----_ .._ i � - � � ,�� --_..__-----_ ___- 0 � � � --- M� - � --- - _- ---- - �__ O �: i p c- � „ �_ j - - � ; I ! - .. .. . �r' , o 0 r� , ' . . � .� _ i _ . � �n a �n � �. -:. { , �., _ _ � ,� . . .. _ . � � � _ Q � � [ , � i _ ; _.— ' ! C �� =' L1 ��.. 1`ln�` CJIY� IJ� O r�' �J d� ! h� C'7 f r ` r O � � � � `1 �� . i ,,. c- , ._; ,,..-,..: , CV � � � � - � ;� �� I � , � w � . �._- -�.��,��smts,;:� ' � -�-� � �' - - - � ` M - - - --- i � � d -- C � _ �.,. � . � ,„ �� _ - • .. . ,.. .. ,.. - , . . , . I _ � --- - _ _ - � ,. �._-- _ � ,' �—+ �' C � ' I I ir- lG�' ' ; � _ - ' �- - 1n _ �� Q � . ' � ' c� .�' ; �- � '�� *�� ; O � �i' Q 1 � � � � � � �� .:_.� � � � ,(a- � ,��,� � .___ � � k � �,.i ` -- -_ 0.� • - — _ � � t � '- i = �,� t _—. -�� –�--f � ��. cw o _'�`- p 2� q q�� ,,--., � I � � L�.�- '` r I� I , • C1 �_.�� _ i ! k- _ �_ - I - i_I i m F� �- r �.:� � �'�.��'� �� .. . — '1' '' , � , � 5� x �,. � � � - ''. —� �''� �, � � �— � � - � � � � � - �� 1 --1` _ - ''' �-,�. -- - � CA 1 C � � �� ,� � � _ � — � �. � � 1'1'I i- _ � i �,� � �-- I � - i �� - ,�' � i l _ 1 _ _ _ — _"— - _ I � _ — � � " ��_ � I I� . � ~r �• ''I _ � _" 1 � ,�,' �', ,•1 � 111) I; � - _ I '-�.�___'_- _ j i I -� � t - , _ � .. . ` . . . i . . � . .. - � � ��'� I _ - — — � v — I —� I I �. _ — �. _. .' _. _—_I ___ � , I � ; � f _ A' � ._ '. . . .. _� a... .. �. .......� � _- `i_ � � �/' I , 1.� � I � �, ^ ' �I _ � _ I � I �� I I I ; F ��1 — � �_ i $� �i I � � � ; i � O � . , ---- , ___ , � _� �T , � t4 V Ri ._ _. . �.r � -- , ; � } 4� � O � � + U � r� � � � � o c� o •.�, . 0� rv o c-� - • , . - , .. .�. . �-f . . . . • _ N � � 4 cy i„�,�- , V "' _ � �; ; N � a � - � � . r ^ t ,y::,� :'... r t - - - � � ` �� o �-_ . � , � - �' _� 2"� � -�� Attachment 3 County of Santa C1ara � - � �; Ofi of tl�e Sl�eriff �-_�� _ ��,, ;. � -� ; ,., ��'-'�-:,. � � ,�,� \1'PS1 l'U1111�;C'r A�'Fflllc' �� ,1„ '- �. ,. S� 1p5C.. Cc�lltOflll'cl �5 1 I C)- 1 7? I '�"� � (�•OS) SO�-��-�)UO L��uric� Sinitlt Slieri�i June 23, 2010 Rick Kitson City of Cupertino 103 00 Torre Ave. Cupertino, Ca. 95014 Dear Rick, Recently I had been requested to respond to any concerns or needs relating to Public Safety services, and needs that the Sheriffls Office may have for cell phone services in the City of Cupertino. The Sheriff's Office provides the Public Safety services to the city of Cupertino. One of the tools used by the Sheriff's Office is the Mobil Data Terminals in the vehicles, as well as cell phones. The MDTs in the vehicle rely upon cell service in order to have a connection, and keep a connection while on pafirol in the city. The deputies also use their eell phones to communieate froin time to time. We have noticed that there are several areas within the city limits of Cupertino that we do not have good cell service. When the cell service fails, it causes the MDT in the vehicle to shut down. This creates and service problem for the deputy working in that area, or passing through that area. He/She then has to wait until they are back in an area where there is good cell service before they can use the MDT in the vehicle, or their cell phone to communicate with dispatch. It becomes frustrating to the deputies to continue to lose cell service and continually have to restart their systems. Cupertino's coverage is relatively good, but there are several areas where cell service becomes a problem. The Sherif�s Office would strongly support any additional cell towers that could be placed in the city of Cupertino to improve those areas that lack coverage. This would help assure that deputies remain connected in order to provide service obligations to the city. The additional cell coverage will help to increase officer safety by not losing access to MDTs and cell phones. It would also assist when we have to set up an Incident Command Post to monitor and run an incident. When in an area with little to no cell service, communication for an incident becomes critical and no service puts residents and law enforcement personnel at risk. Sincerely, �,.-- �36 � � r v `'L.�� Captain Terry Calderone West Valley Division Commander � . E _� 2-18 Attachment 4 �� C N 3 Z 4 2 A �,�� ARTI�TIC ��e�� ; a R E S U LT S WAY -�" AEsims.com 877 �AEesims RE5LJLT5 WAY CUPERTINO CA 9501 4 '� � �?� ,� � � -«.1_._.� � _. b� :. '�k,�. n.� ._ �w'_,� � , ,�M + T � � ! �� '! • 'Ii�Jit ti � � .�iLl� � � .�' j,' . ,,�� , r -� � +, `� �..� �.. , � A " '. j �. !•,'`,� ,; � ,,� � � �t ;, �r� °. �. .�� ,,. .s. �:��'� �� a ' � A (� i , . .. ;� 'Fi� ' y?t � �� .. ,• ` ". i �c..�_ e r . N -• ,,�' { � .��. � � �� i • �i , . �' � .: � ��./�i�1 1 r ��.,.Y eU A`�aYr�� T,' .: �, ` ;� _. � �s l � i � � � � , ��'.� y ` w 1 ^ .`� !; � , �i �, � 1 � t I .� � � ,, .` , :` .. \ � �; 5�2010 Googie Maps , • '�� _ � ,. � :�yF ��Y� . r �7w�.} , N t -~i7`� �. ' .._.... _. .._ ��• ,4,rs� �•� ? ,r �. ''��' Y� ,.r: � .�3� ., � 4) �� , <� (!�'��" ��'i"fi't �i�� : .Kl;�7.!` 4� I � z �"' � 4 � 'r,� �c1 � �a � �� y ,�'�'` r �� PT � ��4+.aAi .-�� _:,. ^ � S _ [ i ... . PROP05ED MONOPINE � e�� 4 ' --- - _ _ �`��`'�'. t �� -- _ - _ � ;� - -� -�... _. r , , - _ - �� —,..-..._...,� � -�.� _ ___,. ,,,� � � t �y; -�----------.._.__,_' �-----___ _. � - - _ .. _ ---- ....� : ; � - _ _ _ �` a `' _ �; � — �_ �..t�,,K�,K_ _ '_-- - _ , .. # � � . - �� ti � M j .'. . .�..... � �� . L ti ' ��': „�; � �y ., t•' ;a ' r ��( � '' � b 4 . . } �Cv t�� . r V l � � � y � , �y� f , �` ' �� . . ��";'�.'s�' �r' �F• ' ` � �-�'r...!�,�'i ,,� ,T �� ",�� , 7.�. , � ,�'�•�s � � : • �t -% ��i� rn "'� . Y �F 4 SM 1 � � � y y� .a + ' a�a t� .��f�.� ��/'�s Y �y�,�. . f �y, �� H� rlV � � �' �i .. . . � . . � h �. F .� � � �` ��f�s�4•:�'� . {r '^+f�c�A��C.s�,�s � � ` . ,.t. . . ��.. H� z _t.t! . - � .� ij "'�-�!- � 1 ��!t! � » �rs�[ilT " , .,•"3�tDl '�7Tt d6f� . . .- .i i j��a � ►' -"�''r�a7Y't . �i� /'!i 1��*Sri'iF . r ��.��' . i,ah! � r . y t}' ,� = a � ' �. ,+ r��+�'y .. . i i � j � � � :; � . � � � , � �' �'� ' . i a`.•�-' !S. � jl � •�� i '�. ��;;� F ;'_.,, <:Gt��..��:� 1: Ir'.��,i �`` ��--`� �� ;, + '� !'" �� t � � � �N, �� f+, � � " _',_� . ; ,. 7 �� . � 1 x .. . « _.,�.' ... � � �.4 � 1 , .� F �, N� . J ' �} _ .�.o_ � q I, •. ._ .� -- ' . « �.ax: r�1L!°� �""..."�- �T' ... - �O�KING SOUTHEAST FROM�IMPERIAL AVENUE i i :, i i � i f i ♦,��l,yY ��tiR! �,� ' . � a �. �� r �, J. � ' � �� •.- , - _- �. ---� ! f i7 � ` ; � x i .� R J� i '� � �'- +� y �iMr 1'� i`%'�} 7 �.. '-' � � '�' V� � �. � ; :e. ,�,,.t�:.'�i� , j� , , '--... . _ , �r�. �.1 ! t, �� " '� f. af- � �� , W � A � � 1�;� _"� j , '_`�' � � '� '.�. �� c�r:�� .� � t , . `"` �'`�.' T � 1 �° �' �. ,� � _ �.6i�1:+�� - .... . _'"_:-` : °� -.. AOCUMCY OF PMOTO BIMULATION 9A6E� UPON INFORM4TI[]N PRU VIOEO BY PN{JJECT I.PPLIOANT. ��..� �a �_s CN3242A RESULTS WAY RESlJLT5 WAY CUPERTINO CA 9501 4 WRTI�TI� �rr�� --� AEsims.com 877.9AE.sims „� ,r �, ,y� �� -� � � _ —� �'�/ �, , - _: 4 - - �, i�an,Y3� Ave ��& : �:' �, ti"�!Y i�� .. • � �� - �� - �w � .� * :- . � � ' - � � _ , � �, '4 x 9. '? ,'�" _ '1 d � k,i '� �� 'i � � � 7 `1 �� •': ' �' �1 ��.1 .� _ y '� 4oR�1 � �'r � _ r ,�� ` -. . I .+��qt'M'R1+��" � r � � ��A �. '� : , ;.� ' ' = ` 3 � �„ . :�` ✓` . yr r d ,�� . _ Y 1 i�-1'�'1? y � v, � . , f , �.. b � N •�� j .: � . � i.� �� T i ��l •�.r l.>��. n � '`� � �.� � � �1 �� _ .. �. �l � •... .h .,. }' _ __` ..i. `�.. �.:.` � 3 : . �l�t •� � • { e��'�r� : ,' � r � y:, ,�s� . •r � � � ♦. � . �,�,. a .� • , � �;' s. ,. . ��'�1- Y� �. � �.. � � .r.x . t v � '�-• � .1 �/d N J _ . . '�' { �I '�"�, —� t; : x �=. ,� ' ' ' ' ' "'.�'.,.� ..I�► � �i p •t �� 1 N 4�,+ •" .• u �—.� C'� �f' a; O ` � '" �` � i �� '; '} , i� ' ,�:� : � ;r � � r �- � ; � . r ' ''� .�i, _. i�ti L _ •, �'° Z �f,�. � �' ', y ��. • t �,'' � � -- - �,-,' 02010 Gooyle Maps ""'""-•��. .. — �--�— f yr � �� w " J .._��' . _ ' � u '. � ��'�� +1�"` +,T ^yL -(� qtX'��" "]� "� cy f = v "y� 1 � :1N1 . . - . . . . .ntll�skjSV nA . .�ufi . ... LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM IMPERIAL AVENUE AGCIIfiAGT OF PHOTO GIMULATION BABEO UPOH INfORMATION PROVIDEO 6`/ PfiOJECT APPIICANT. �..� , �a& C N 3 24ZA RESULTS WAY RESULTS WAY CUPERTIND CA 9501 4 -� ARTISTIC ras��'��';�t� � � AEsims.com 877.9AE.sims ± � ��►' '�l +�kr"i ' r q� � 'it7C'.. - - � ,� r c Gr,r�yLa n.c .��' �t�� 1 �� y ' � "� 1 � ' � '-F . � s:" �` � �� , i � .•�i1 ` � � � � � � 9�i'.s .C:C:F ''( .� �:� v � f �� "��"�': � A ,��_" !�+' i *tin`��y� t {� �. � � ,., � : �t`° . .. . � ��.� j � ; + _ � ,v 1 '� � �.��.r. F�'�� *� � � � . F _�. �. �E] "+ :sa:• i , _ '�,, : � � J � r t ' • � `�� ♦ • •` �_ - w ��' 1n ♦ ��,�.� �r ! ♦ �� !� � ? � � I • y '� p ` �� a �� '�_��►. • .r p�',� ♦ �s ' rF' ..—�• �i_ : • «�� N I � �' { � � '° � ..� _ �..r►' ��?� �' N �R� . , - •.; '� • � '° � �' 1 w , � � � � � ^ `� � ��` ` 4 t . � � ' J � k� �� . �t t*�. '` ��.::. i .� ''� �: L : .* a , L„ � ' � ��. � �� _ ,.�: i � . � 1 r :� � t,'� � + � '4i �`.. {. � , ' + ',.-,�, � � i �� t � � � ,. �i � `. ;, . ��, ��*� � � �.�.��. ,� * �o � 4 �A _ 1._ 02010 Gooyte hlaps ACCURACI' Of PM�TO SIMULATION BAHEO 11PON INF�RMATION PROVIUE[] 6Y PiIOJECT I�PPLIGANT. LOOKING 50lJTH FROM TOWNHOUSE DRIVEWAY Attachment 5 AT8�T Mobility • Proposed Base Station (Site No. CN3242A) Results Way • Cupertino, California Statement of Hammett & E�iison, Inc., Consulting Engineers The firm of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Cor.sulting Engineers, has been retained on behalf of AT&T Mobility, a personal wireless telecomm�inications carrier, to evaluate the base station (Site No. CN3242A) proposed to be located at Result� Way in Cupertino, California, for compliance with appropriate guidelines limiting human exposure to radio frequency ("RF") electromagnetic fields. Prevailing E:cposure Standards The U.S. Congress requires that the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") evaluate its actions for possible significant impact on the e�vironment. A summary of the FCC's exposure limits is shown in Figure 1. These limits apply fo�• continuous exposures and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regard ess of age, gender, size, or health. The most restrictive FCC limit for exposures of unlimited duration to radio frequency energy for several personal wireless services are as follows: Wireless Service Fre4i�enc�Band Occupational Limit Public Limit , Microwave (Point-to-Point) 5-80,( 00 MHz 5.00 mW/cm 1.00 mW/cm BRS (Broadband Radio) 2,�i00 5.00 1.00 AWS (Advanced Wireless) 2, .00 5.00 1.00 PCS (Personal Communication) 1,!�50 5.00 1.00 Cellular ��70 2.90 0.58 SMR (Specialized Mobile Radio) ;�55 2.85 0.57 700 MHz '�00 2.35 0.47 [most restrictive frequency range] 30—:i00 1.00 0.20 General Fac:ility Requirements Base stations typically consist of two distinct parts: the electronic transceivers (also called "radios" or "channels") that are connected to the traditional wired telephone lines, and the passive antennas that send the wireless signals created by the radios out to be received by individual subscriber units. The transceivers are often located at ground level � nd are connected to the antennas by coaxial cables. A small antenna for reception of GPS signals is also required, mounted with a clear view of the sky. Because of the short wavelength of the frequencies assigned by the FCC for wireless services, the antennas require line-of-sight paths for their ;>ignals to propagate well and so are installed at some height above ground. The antennas are design ed to concentrate their energy toward the horizon, with very little energy wasted toward the sky or th�; ground. Along with the low power of such facilities, this means that it is generally not possible for exposure conditions to approach the maximum permissible exposure limits without being phy<. ically very near the antennas. '< HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. AT3242596 Cp?�SI,L"I'ING 6NG1NL-:Gf'S ^ �3:' `. .� 5.4P I'KANCISCY) Page 1 of 3 ;'.-22 AT&T Mobility • Proposed Base Station (Site No. CN3242A) Results Way • Cupertino, California Computer Vlodeling Method The FCC provides direction for determining cc mpliance in its Office of Engineeririg and Technology Bulletin No. 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC-Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Radiation," dated August 1997. Figure 2 attached describes the calculation methodologies, reflecting the facts that a direclional antenna's radiation pattern is not fully formed at locations very close by (the "near-field" effect:l and that at greater distances the power level from an energy source decreases with the square of t ie distance from it (the "inverse square law"). The conservative nature of this method for evaluati zg exposure conditions has been verified by numerous field tests. Site and F�icility Description Based upon information provided by AT&'T, including zoning drawings by Jeffrey Rome & Associates, Inc., dated June 10, 2010, it is proposed to install twelve Kathrein Model 742-264 directional parael antennas on a new 67-foot stf;el pole, configured to resemble a pine tree, to be sited near the western edge of the parking lot locatecl at Results Way in Cupertino. The antennas would be mounted with up to 4° downtilt at an effective height of about 65 feet above ground and oriented in groups of four toward 20°T, 140°T, and 260°'I', to provide service in all directions. The maximum effective radiated power in any direction would be 2,580 watts, representing simultaneous operation at 1,485 watts for PCS and 1,095 watts for cellular. Also located on the roof of a building 130 ft� o the northwest are similar antennas for use by Sprint Nextel. For the limited purpose of this study, the transmitting facilities of those carriers are assumed to be as follows: O�erator Service Maximum ERF' Antenna Model Beamtilt Heisht Sprint Nextel PCS 1,500 watts Andrew RR9017 0° 34'/z ft Study Results For a person anywhere at ground, the maxinium ambient RF exposure level due to the proposed AT&T operation by itself is calculated to be 0. J042 mW/cm which is 0.62% of the applicable public exposure limit. The maximum calculated curr ulative level at ground, for the simultaneous operation of both carriers, is 0.75% of the public exposure limit. The maximum calculated cumulative level on the roof of any nearby building� is 3.2% of the public limit. The maximum calculated cumulative level at the second-floor elevation of any nearby residence is 0.93% of the public exposure limit. It * Located immediately to the west, based the drawings fi Located at least 245 feet away, based on aerial photo;;raphs from Google Maps. � HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. AT3242596 ' C��S� LTl'.�'G 1:NG]NEti1:S : sarv r•w�NCisco Page 2 of 3 �'-23 AT&T Mobility • Proposed Base Station (Site No. CN3242A) Results Way • Cupertino, California should be noted that these results include sever;il "worst-case" assumptions and therefore are expected to overstate actual power density levels. No Recommend�:d Mitigation Measures Due to their mounting locations, the AT&T a�rtennas would not be accessible to the general public, and so no mitigation measures are necessary to comply with the FCC public exposure guidelines. It is presumed that AT&T will, as an FCC license�, take adequate steps to ensure that its employees or contractors comply with FCC occupational ex�osure guidelines whenever work is required near the antennas themselves. Mitigation measures for the Sprint Nextel facility have not been determined as part of this study. Cc�nclusion Based on the information and analysis abo`�e, it is the undersigned's professional opinion that operation of the base station proposed by AT �iT Mobility at Results Way in Cupertino, California, will comply with the prevailing standards for 1 imiting public exposure to radio frequency energy and, therefore, will not for this reason cause a� ignificant impact on the environment. The highest calculated level in publicly accessible areas is much. less than the prevailing standards allow for exposures of unlimited duration. This findin,; is consistent with measurements of actual exposure conditions taken at other operating base station,>. A��thorship The undersigned author of this statement is a qualified Professional Engineer, holding California Registration No. E-18063, which expires on June 30, 2011. This work has been carried out under his direction, and all statements are true and correct of his own knowledge except, where noted, when data has been supplied by others, which data he beli �ves to be correct. Q RpFESSl�)N q ��C.� � MA ) y �c�'� , y � G� � �" No. E-18C63 m� Rajat Mathur, P.E. W � EXp . 6-30-: �0�� 707/996-5200 * August 20, 2010 * �, j, F �\�, qT F �F CA� �F�� HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. AT3242596 co�sci:ri:vc �:NCaNrr�s snrv rk�wcisru Page 3 of 3 �'-24 FCC Radio Freq�aency Protection Guide The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom A�t) the Federal Communications Commission (`.`FCC") to adopt a nationwide human exposure� standar�i to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a significant impact on the environment. The F CC adopted the limits from Report No. 86, "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofreque scy Electromagnetic Fields," published in 1986 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements ("NCRP"). Separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter limits generally five times more restrictive. The more recent standard, developed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and approved as American National Standard ANSUIEEE C95.1-2006, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz," includes similar limits. These limits apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent margin of s� fety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. As shown in the table and chart below, separ�te limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter limits (in italics and/��r dashed) up to five times more restrictive: Frequenc,}! Electroma n�etic Fields (f is frequencv of emission in MHzL Applicable Electric Magnetic Equivalent Far-Field Range Field Strength Field Strength Power Density (MHz) (V/m) (A/m) (mW/cm 03 — 1.34 614 614 1.63 1.63 100 100 1.34 — 3.0 614 823.8/,`' 1.63 2.19/f 100 180/f 3.0 — 30 1842/ f 823.8/,` 4.89/ f 2.19/f 900/ f 180/f 30 — 300 61.4 � 27.5 0.163 0.0729 1.0 0.2 ' 300 — 1,500 3.54�f 1.59ff �f/106 �f/238 f/300 f/I500 1,500 — 100,000 137 61.4 0.364 0.163 5.0 1.0 1000 / Occupational Exposure � 100 � PCS o •� � 10 ��` FM Cell a' q � 1 �. � �� v / 0.1 � — — Public Exposure 0.1 1 10 100 10 10 10 F� equency (MHz) Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits, and higher levels also are allowed for exposures to small areas, such that the spatially averaged levels do not exceed the limits. However, neither of these al: owances is incorporated in the conservative calculation formulas in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) for projecting field levels. Hammett & Edison h��s built those formulas into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rect�ingular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual radio sources. The prog:•am allows for the description of buildings and uneven terrain, if required to obtain more accurate proj�;ctions. �� HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. coNSUL�rn�rc Errcu�rEExs FCC Guidelines SAN FRANCISCO Figure 1 �:-25 fV'R.CFILC Calculation Methodology Assessment by Calculation of Co rpliance with FCC Exposure Guidelines The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act;� the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to adopt a nationwide human exposure standard t�� ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a significant impact on the environment. The ma:�imum permissible exposure limits adopted by the FCC (see Figure 1) apply for continuous exposures �rom all sources and are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or health. Higher levels are allowed for short periods of time, such that total expo: ure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits. Near Field. Prediction methods have been developed for the near field zone of panel (directional) and whip (omnidirectional) antennas, typical at wireles s telecommunications base stations, as well as dish (aperture) antennas, typically used for microwave links. The antenna patterns are not fully formed in the near field at these antennas, and the FCC 1)ffice of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) gives suitable formulas for calculating power density within such zones. � _ Ig0 �.1 X Pnet TIlW 2 For a panel or whip antenna, power density ,�� e x , n x D x h' in /cm , sw �. 1x16xr�xP net and for an aperture antenna, maximum power censity S _ � x h2 , in mW/cm where 6gW = half-power beamwidth c f the antenna, in degrees, and Pnet = net power input to the � ntenna, in watts, , D= distance from antenna, i i meters, h= aperture height of the ar. tenna, in meters, and r� = aperture efficiency (uni�:less, typically 0.5-0.8). The factor of 0.1 in the numerators converts to the desired units of power density. Far Field. OET-65 gives this formula for calculating powe r density in the far field of an individual RF source: 2.56 x].64 x 100 x RFF x ERP � mw power density s = 2 � � 4xatxD where ERP = total ERP (all polarizations 1, in kilowatts, RFF = relative field factor at the direction to the actual point of calculation, and D= distance from the center of -adiation to the point of calculation, in meters. The factor of 2.56 accounts for the increase in power density due to ground reflection, assuming a reflection coefficient of 1.6 (1.6 x 1.6 = 2.56) The factor of 1.64 is the gain of a half-wave dipole relative to an isotropic radiator. The factor oi' 100 in the numerator converts to the desired units of power density. This formula has been built ini o a proprietary program that calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total ex��ected power density from any number of individual radiation sources. The program also allows f�r the description of uneven terrain in the vicinity, to obtain more accurate projections. HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. Methodology a CONSUL'TII�IG ENGINEERS Fi ure 2 SAN FRANCLSCO g ;�-26 Attachment 6 �a" .;. ' � , ' - .'LV1�iI f H AV �....., �.. =.r- : •,� , � • ��,�s +` �, `'R � t� � ( --, '., u l� '. F ` � � s � , '• � : .: ' � . 'i ��,�,�' e � 'e+� � " j y ' �� .�� L � �" `� �� E "�. � � � F� � _ � �,•� � � h k � �� S ! � � ��, ��'�''' . F �, ' �r i' _ 'a_ �r Y � �.,r � yq �( r„ � � � 1' ��_ " r ,•' � � �. � �'..' . � " r fS � � ��F ! � 1� t .�� i ! ,�I * • , . 1 I �� . , "R .�C'.a � .�� '` .� - �� t -, .+ . 4 �,� , - �l# z.. ��. ` � � ,� " , �r'`�� .� r�. �� '�, .� r � 4 � �� '..`... 1� i. � , � I �� i ` k � s�- � � F . - � � ��• t, �. �� F�, � , , V : •. � t,.� -� � � �y,ie C� +'+� � • �D'E�I A .,, � <. : �, ULI� A`�'E a. � - ' � � �- � '� m . .. J - - s _ . - , ',,: ,,. ' 1 � ...�_.._ � ., .. � ,� � � � � � . • , n r' -:: _., d(.: » � �] �s♦ . �• . 1. _ _,.� a .,�"_�,y��• . � �,� �;'�I`Al.. �� .� -r� � � 1'� � � ' �.._, �� _ •' k r„ . , �M ,` 'i� ; ; � � � .� i: � � .ti i � M1 � �i � � � 'H f„�,.i �L � 1 '� � : . IIA ...._�7'" F•<.�. ��1' � � , , � , 'a .�� , � �- ,';,, ;� � r � � � �� , ,. � � � ?.. ' I `.' .n.._� 4 V � ') ��' . "'�.� � ,� � � � � � � � � r;.�;,� � . � , �_ ! � �t. � a • i' ��; i ;_>� ��' �f � '�� . - ! , r. � r" � a:,� � ,.,., � �N _ R� ��D�:AVE �' � �'� � � �.1 k _ F _-°'�„�e �: � ,� : ' .•, - . �� '' � � � � '�'� � °!"=,� ��'y �; � � `�'i�l' � � � � °'� � '�": ��'� €� .` tl � �•'" �� E � �� '" , F . Oi�� o ,� A ~"'Y! f � �j Q � ,�+� a`' ,� � _ -" rL E �k. �, �''i �� ' � 4`�" � �' ' � �'�� e� ., i �_ � � �.. , � �' j � � i"'_' ' 1 - `t !� � ,� � � !! ' , > J ; .R . � �` ` j� � ,;„ - tt � ' s ' � ,;� -� -- ., �� j � ,� �.! � � � M� " . . '�, �'" �t� � � �'�ate Ital t � _ � � , � "� . T �1_ � '�r i�`r�t�.A►V.�� - "�, � �`�' , .,-'"' _ .. -_ � — . ._ _ _ _ , _ ,: .. _, - _ . � �. ..�- ?/�� . �.. — � R' .S � � � Y � �' � a � �,�..... � ��. � � � .� �_" � ^ � . � , . ��+. . '' � � � � . a � ^ � �y '" �:., : •.' � � Ob� � �� f;� ' �. -' ! I . � _ � � � r ..� + •� � �. � , v � � �^ � � . � � . +1 � � .... � � � � .;.� _ ;�5� ' � y , � s� .1 � � � - i "'"' � � � e ' { � �� 'V� '•� �� - � ��-- i• � ��•,� � . � �`'�� a. � 4 �' ��l . : j �� _ ,,� � & ;,�-�, . ��. �� , ; �, .- � �;+ � �.� � � _ . . .� ,_.,_ � - �. �� ,� � � . � , � �� -��-, . � �. . _. .. � � ' �- �. �� -+ � : �.; � �..=..',�� --�, � � hva�n�*a,rv�T��:-,-.� y - � � � ,�� -, � s � ,, � � „ � z � � "� � � `� '�— � ` � `...+ �,t (�''� �� _ '� °', e • � 1 r � ' r ` k � '�11� F'� � .�-� � �� t . � � � �` t� L�,� _ � . L:'� . L � � ' M" ' � � ,� � -- ,';�'�� }�� c-� �� — � , , ^� i r r � � a, , /� ' �j .�� . .3 ' � � � +-A�1 C�; L .� ( � � � '�"� "w � �..,� � l . e:a'-:x- .,,�� , rt � � . '�' .?� / � �• .y� � W..rr.L.� �� =-- C� c � r _ wi „ ��„ �'— - � ' -,. u c" . "- ».� .. �; l� r..� .. � " .'iFA i " � � . .. . «...w i . ' _ ..� . • A{.: 1lOL �R � . . .. �. , � � .. �� !i�,I}�.... . r ' �~ , n t . . . ,.. R , � K� ~ � � w�l.R- T � +.�C � : ', � � k � t � � _ . , ---, � � { ,:i• �' �' � _.. �� i :, --•, � 1 � . � , �..,Y...�. f'� r �� ;.a� � '� � % ` i � y'y �,�� p +_ � � ' �� r � ' ; t � � j. -- � r� � �• �� i� ��ry��::.� ' . �M*- L_ � � �.. �.�•. J . rs •_' .a,•j � :. ,.` . , !t � . �: i i S :.? g � Y . K •-,....�s `. . _ . ..t; �'� e � �.. ` t ' � � [ � Q ` ��'� f �.�r-u .�� t ,*� ( � � sy � �_ � r �' t� f : i �i.� � � t� "F� � �� p � � � � � � z.� t j� Y , - � - �l�� S �, r � �. r�y.. .' , �< , �! q , a . • ,. . w Y _.� i . . � .'� (�_ �j�� ,.. . f, '� , � � ., . i �. �. _. ��1 � �+l. y �`; ^ . ; , , -;m �..,. s s�, G � L P r�- I ,, ,� ;'� I : � ; . ,,,x. „ 1 . �. .' � � � � + ,;Y.-.. __ .:� b•'�L ,r�'t�: r - a � �� :x' �! � a {t . - .:�dr .�' �f' �' r , t �"' � Cl � �.� � 4! e : L Ii.Wl.+ !.. � , � � ..� r : / � �p'.' �. f . � t. � 4 � �,� f k �i3 . �, � h"y' �'::5� p/i �g' ' •r �+' � 6 ` , ,��'Y lV'• ��? M E�� .�i' �: �oF . Y� P � r t� M " "=' ' t r,�x, v� i , :r: :� .. ��° � �; � t �»,: ° � ' �s � `I �' � I � � E �� U ""' . . :a��. � � � ■�i� _ � � i° ; � r �S '� •._ � P`.. �II F i� �6� y,^ ;�. .� �r R .. ) y �„ ~ � .`- �� ,,� r, .,:V� ~ - f � � � . � � . .. � ,� r;1p`, n .g � ww .,. � � � �, F*!� . �r� � ` ��f� . � _ t�� `� •. ' y �: : r � '��,�- , � � :� ._ �� : `��.'A�R��'IDlf�`' �� = v:. GR `` � �"' ,��' f �6�'_ • � �� : �.'��R� �� r � ' • � * , 4 ' �s(� �.�._ .. _ .. �. ._ -�.. - y, , � , � � . , .. � � �',_ , �„� �� _ .-� � �. ,.,,� _•,,G�}- � .„ ,� _ • ,� � . . -� ,P'"a �' ` �, � :� ' : �-"� k:� �� r �.i�: L ' , r � � ,. Og��. .. �,_ [ � � i� � ;�L - � . .. - t � � � � '� � : C� re.. _ � ,-- � -.�. � �� y' t �'' - ��' ; " � 1/ ��l > � �: 41L c. �� r .,+� ` . � ' w' � --• ". . ` y � � — z � —?� r—n � --.. j . �l ... � � �, VT�• ,! r� � - � rc: ._ eT .i e: � i. � � f� Lrc ��.,s � _ '�`.y'�� s" O•' �� i.¢ Y+' rt— � � �'p. ,,� r r,„ Y �`T ' "' s""` �„"} ' � a rs".-^.� � 1 ; � � 1� � [� •. a�k� .+� � y d 1 r ,� _� �� .,,1 �� 4 � � �� .,�.r '�.�,. 3,� �, G.�- �.�- � � �r�l� ' A �".` j �..;�� • ` � �'iE��"��e ;,� �, - �� .��:n � �. . � .� : _.� ��:,�, ] �� ; � . .�i. f � r.. �t, 11 Ni� � �" r ., �.r f� �� • � � �. J � '=i � , � , �� , ,, . ' � .�� ° . ,� ��C!°!.; �'��";:, F-��.�,. - S��11V01. G� ` �� ,� �'��+1t �:�.��. "�� :*' -�k�'AN ISP.bR7D'R' '�� .� �:r �iN�,�. _ _ �"�, '� t t �`�-� � �-.�, � ,.,� � � r � . , , � � ' ��:::� `9 �� '� �� ,� � �.�!'�S�L�� I "��' '��► +� �„''"�'' �;.. ..»��.`i%� .'. , L .L:l.�I.a.' �+� � , _' . ��n�� ' '" )} .. !.. . I ` � �`.a).t„ ( �� .. P 4 •l�r � � . { -! � � ,'� \_ wa � iJ�� . +�.. ... r _ .. ..Y ... . ` � � ' � . �.� '�.. � I ,�. � , �`I � � .., 4 � � � p� ��p � � �yj . E r -: �+D � n� !� 4 D �!' ,-- a�?".t.. � _ � � ' r � ' H �Gt'` ir 'Q�� . s , � r__t �' �� ' I � • = �� 1i S . ��-_-_� ��.�:.. . _ �i+. ... �:.t � 4, � i! �'it'3 �! � es� �s � �w a � �] _ _.. � E �' _ , r. t e�s�. � v_ _ �r � c.�� w. ..�� . .� AT�T Facilit Alternate Sites Aerial Ma Y p 2-2� Attachment 7 Alternative Site Analysis Results Way, Cupertino The locating or siting of a wireless tele �ommunications facility (WTF� is driven by technological concerns and requirements, which include the service area, geographical elevation and the topography of the area, a lignment with other sites in the network, and customer demand components. Placement wi thin the urban geography is dependent on these requirements. Moreover, selection of sites for wireless telecommunications facilities is `locationally dependent', meaning that the siting of a WT]� is driven by the location of existing sites in the network chain. Wireless telecommunications facilities operate at low-power. Due to the low- power signals of wireless facilities, the distan�:e over which the facilities extend is limited to a geographically small area or `cell'. An ove:�lapping patchwork of such cells is needed to provide seamless coverage over a larger geog raphical area. As the caller moves through cells, one cell relays its signal to the next. Where there is a`gap' in this coverage, a call is either `dropped' (disconnected) or `blocked' (never �:onnected), resulting in a failure of the network. Consequently, the lack of one site can lead to significant gaps in service. There are additional requirements for locatir.g a site. The first is the size of the property and its available space. The size of the availsible space on the property must be able to accommodate the facility. This includes both the antenna support structure and the associated electronic equipment. The second is having a property owner who is willing to lease space. The Radio Frequency (RF) Engineer for A T&T has specific requirements, which include improving in-building coverage on Highw�_y 85 from Stevens Creek Boulevard to South Stelling Road, in-building coverage on McCl� �llan Road from Byrne Avenue to South Stelling Road and the surrounding schools and collegE�s. AT&T and Trillium Consulting, Inc. explored the possibility of locating at other sites w thin and near the search ring. The results of exploring these other sites are described belo� �v: Potential Co-Location Opportunity: � 10420 Bubb Road, Cupertino — The prc�perty owner and AT&T were not interested in pursuing a lease due to lack of room for a facility. Other Alternative Locations Explored: • Monte Vista High School — School Bo�ird rejected proposal due to neighborhood concerns (similar concerns to the propc�sed location). • 21495 McClellan Road, Cupertino —The property owner and AT&T were not interested in lease due to lack of room for a facili.y. i:-28 • Industrial Areas to the East-These were reviewed and had no available space (without taking up parking spaces) or were too c lose to the freeway where AT&T currently has coverage. � • Utility Poles — these are used in extrem�; locations where a standard wireless facility cannot be built (steep hillsides, public right-of-way, etc.). If utility poles are used, height is compromised and it would take multiple facilities to obtain the same coverage that one standard facility (such as the one propo �ed) can obtain. This search ring that has been designated by A7'&T consists of a large amount of residential properties, which are tough areas to locate wire: ess facilities. This being the case, Monte Vista High School was looked at as a potential candic ate to locate a facility. The School Board decided that they were not interested in a lease so we had to move on to other alternative locations. Once the residential properties and the high school w�;re ruled out, the next alternative that was looked at was the Results Way property. It is an indus�rial parcel that could accommodate a wireless facility and would accommodate AT&T's cove�•age and capacity objectives. After multiple recommendations and comments from both the Planning Commission and the property owner as far as location on the parcel, the proposed locat on that has been submitted is most ideal for the placement of the proposed facility. Any furtheY to the east would conflict with future development plans by the property. Moving thE; facility closer to the freeway would also not be feasible for AT&T due to existing coverage in the area (good coverage). 2-29 Attachment 8 CITY U F CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertin��, California 95014 (408) 777-3262 To: Planning Cominission Colin Jung, Senior Planner From: Avinash Gadre, Commissioner Technology, Information & Commuxacations Commission Date: August 25, 2010 Subject: Comments on Referral of Revised M onta Vista Cell Site Proposal, U-2010-03, EXC- 2010-04 Here are my comments: 1. Radiation exposure: RF study is basf�d on 65 feet height of the antenna from ground however, lowest level of ant�nnas (set of 4) is about 35 feet. Exposure may still remain within FCC limits � ut I guess numbers need to be re-worked based on lowest level antennas 2. Esthetics: Esthetically treepole wori �: be noticeable as cell tower to general public. 3. Benefits to Cupertino Residents : Th.s cell tower will definitely benefit Cupertino residents since currently AT&T has ��oor coverage at and around this location. 2-30 CIT'Y C►F CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertinc>, California 95014 (408) 777-3262 To: Planning Conunission Colin Jung, Senior Planner From: Peter Friedland, Vice-Chair Technology, Information & Commurdcations Commission Date: August 24, 2010 Subject: Comments on Referral of Revised Monta Vista Cell Site Proposal, U-2010-03, EXC- 2010-04 My comments: 1. Radiation exposure: the RF study seexn�; properly done and shows that maximum possible exposure at both ground and near by roof level is far less than the federal ma�cimums. 2. Esthetics: while it will be a large treepol e, I believe the location within a commercial area provides adequate camouflage and sh�uld not adversely impact the neighborhood. 3. Other: Given the importance of AT&T c overage to the city of Cupertino and the major gap in the area centered on Bubb Ro,�d and McClellan, I strongly support the 12- antenna concept. It would be useful to see their projected coverage which was included with the prior application but I could not fi nd in this one. , 2-31 Colin Jung Attachment 9 From: Asker Junaid [askerjuna@yaho��.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20'10 8:47 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: New AT&T Cell tower Please permit AT&T to erect the cell tower at the proposed site. I have a AT&T family plan with five lines and we have lots of difficulty talking due poor quality of calls in Rose Blossom Dr. Asker Sent from my iPhone 1 2-32 Colin Jung From: Jason Kung [jasonckung@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20' 0 9:25 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: AT&T wireless coverage Dear Mr. 7ung, I am a resident of Cupertino and I support adding a proposed tree pole in Monte Vista area. Thank you! ]ason Kung 10104 CRESCENT COURT CUPERTINO, CA 95014 � 1 2-33 Colin Jung From: leon hsing [ahsing@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10:13 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: support AT&T to have a better H�ireless phone coverage in cupertino area � 2-34 Colin Jung From: Donna M. Cotner [Donna@Cotr erDDS.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20'10 10:58 AM To: Colin Jung Cc: Donna M. Cotner Subject: improved wireless coverage I am voicing my support for better wireless ccverage in Cupertino. My Dental Office is in the city and my ATT reception is spotty at best ! Anything you can do to help would be appreciated !! Thank you, Donna M. Cotner, DDS Apple iPhone technology 1 � �.-35 Colin Jung From: qi song (qisongliang@yahoo.coin] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20' 0 10:56 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Support AT8�T proposal We support AT&T's proposal for adding a cell site in Monta Vista area of Cupertino. Cupertino resident and AT&T cell phone users. Qi Song & Feng Liang 1 2-36 Colin Jung From: Llew Kinst [Ik@gioplus.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20' 0 10:36 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: ATT Service Hi Colin I would like to add my support to the effort of improving ATT cell service in the Monta Vista area of Cupertino. The service in the Monta Vista area currently is very poor. I am a consultant and work from home quite often. The poor service is"a detriment to my business. I would think that other businesses in the area area also experience the same problems. It is so bad I would consider moving my business to an other part of the valley outside of Cupertino that provides better service. I find it hard to believe that Cupertino, the home of Apple Computer would not put more effort into providing world class service to the entire city, and in particular the Bubb road area which housed many Apple offices. If there is anything I can do to help this prccess along please let me know Thanks You Llew Kinst Autograph Designed 650-814-2480 1 2-37 Colin Jung From: Terry [terrylanglais@comcast.n�;t] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20�10 10:21 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Better Support for AT&T coverage We would support all efforts to improve AT&T coverage in the Monte Vista area. It is ironic that we support a local companies product, Ap�le, and as a result the cell coverage is the worst in the city it is headquartered in - Cu�ertino. As a city government who could make decisions to improve the coverage it is unfathomable that there should be need of any conversation to dc so. Please just get it done. Cupertino resident and taxpayer for 23 years. 1 2-38 Colin Jung From: Nancy Chapman [nancy_ea_ch;jpman@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, September O8, 20' 0 10:17 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Art wireless coverage I support better wireless coverage in the Monte Vista area. Nancy Chapman Sent�from Nancy's iPhone , i �-39 Colin Jung From: Caelyn Casanova (caelyncasan�rva@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20' 0 10:14 AM To: Colin Jung , Subject: AT&T coverage Hello, I support your measures but feel that you should know it's Monta Vista, Monte Vista is a different school. Sent from my iPhone 1 2-40 Colin Jung From: barry.h@mindspring.com Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20�10 10:16 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Monta vista cell coverage Monta vista needs better cell coverage. I su�port AT&T in developing better cell coverage in monta vista. Barry Hoberman Sent from my iPhone 1 2-41 Colin Jung From: Carolyn Miller [carolynmiller_crs�yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20' 0 10:12 AM To: Colin Jung Cc: Bert Frescura; Carolyn Miller Subject: Better cell coverage Please help with better cell coverage in the Monta Vista area. Thanks Carolyn Miller 10100 Phar Lap Drive Cupertino Sent from my iPhone � 2-42 Colin Jung From: Linda vanderhule [billsvonhaag�;ndaz@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:17 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: AT&T Cell Coverage Dear Colin, I have AT&T service and I can NOT use my phonE at my home. I live near the corner of Bubb and McClellan. I have complained to AT&T for years now about no service. It is actually a dangerous and serious situation. A fews year back there was a fire in the canyon and even the Police and Fire department complained of having NO SERVICE AVAILABLE. I fully support putting in what ever it takes to give this black hole area Cell Coverage from AT&T. It affects many people and there is no reason that we should be denied service. Please continue to fight for BETTER AT&T CELL COVERAGE. �Thank you �Linda vanderhule � 2-43 Colin Jung From: lior landesman [Ilandesman@g raii.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:15 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Support for better wireless cove�rage in Cupertino-Monta Vista area I Support for better ATT wireless coverage and support the proposed cell site in the Monte Vista area of Cupertino, California. Lior Landesman 10972 Wilkinson Ave Cupertino CA 95014 Mobile : 408-891-5494 i �-44 Colin Jung From: John Bjeletich [bjeletich@att.nei] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20' 0 8:12 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Improved coverage Please allow the construction of an AT&T antenna "tree" in Monta Vista. Our service in this area is currently very inadequate. Thank you. �ohn and Nancy Bjeletich 10184 Carmen Road Cupertino Sent from my iPhone 1 2-45 Colin Jung From: Lisa Kelly [wplus@earthlink.netj Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:10 AM To: Colin Jung Cc: Lisa Kelly Subject: Fwd: Help improve coverage in ��upertino, CA Dear City Planner Jung, I am a long-time resident of Monte Vista. I have lived t.ere since 1987. I love this neighborhood. I am writing in support of the new cell site in Cupertinc�. We need better AT&T coverage in the area. Sincerely, Lisa J. Kelly 10049 Minaker CT • Cupertino, CA 95014 Begin forwarded message: From: AT&T <att�a�,em.wireless.att-mail.com> Date: September 8, 2010 7:12:29 AM PDT To: "LISA KELLY" < wplus cr,earthlink.net Subject: Help improve coverage in Cupertin��, CA Reply-To: AT&T.6q1ix071k8 .fg sx6(a�em.wirel�;ss.att-mail.com View on Mobile Device � View in Weh Browser x ---_..--- AT&T is working hard to irlprove wireless coverage in and around the Monte Vista ar��a in Cupertino, California. Your voice will help bring a bette r wireless service sooner by supporting a new cell site ir. Cupertino. 1 2-46 Colin Jung From: John Niedermaier (jgniedermaiE�r@yahoo.com) Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 7:28 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Proposed new cell tower for AT4�T Dear Mr. Jung - I am a long-time resident of Cupertino, residing at 20629 Rodrigues Ave. I have also been a long-time mobile customer of AT&T, and have s�ffered through many years of poor coverage in the Monta Vista area through which I drive often and was a Little League baseball coach. I understand that there is now finally a proposal for a new cell tower in this area. I am writing to express my full support for this proposed new tower. I hope you and other city officials will approve this as soon as possible. . Thank you, and kindest regards, � 7ohn Niedermaier 1 2 -47 Colin Jung From: Ramesh Kurnool (rkurnool) [rkurnool@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 7:15 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Please help provide better cove�age for ATT in Monta Vista area H i, ' This is Ramesh Kurnool and I leave in the Monta Vista area. My daughter is a Sophomre at Monta Vista and my son goes to Kennedy Middle school. For several years we have noticed that the cell coverage for ATT has been very bad and we have trouble reaching my kids after school during pickup siiice both of them have ATT phones and the connection has always been very very intermittent. I am herewith emailin�; you my support to improve the coverage for ATT in that area. Ramesh 1 i:-48 Colin Jung From: Vaidehi Potluri [vaidehi_potluri(ayahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 7:24 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: AT&T cell phone tower p�opos� I in monta vista area in Cupertino Good morning Colin, I have heard about AT&T proposing the cell � hone tower in Cupertino to give better coverage in Monta Vista Area. I do not have any objection or issue on the prcposal and I would here by vote "Yes" for the hearing to be held on September 14th at 6:45 P.M. at the City of (;upertino Communiiy I�all, 10350 Torre Avenue. I am a resident of Cupertino living in Monta V ista Area. Regards, srinivas Potluri 1 2-49 Colin Jung From: Fan Jiao [fjiao@juniper.net) Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 7:22 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: support for better wireless cove by ATT Hello Colin, I have lived in the Monte Vista area for 15 years. I have always h� ving problems receiving/making calls at the house (too bad, the other carriers didn't have the cell phones I wanted). . Now I am informed that ATT is adding a new cell site. I support tF is new addition. Fan Jiao Krzich Place, Cupertino 1 2-50 Colin Jung From: Steadybalu [steadybalu@aol.ccm] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:31 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Support for better Coverage fror AT&T in Cupertino Hi As a Cupertino resident, I would support this, provided there� are no significant environmental issues associated with it. Thanks Anand Balaram 1 l i-51 Colin Jung From: Tejel Patel [tpate1079@yahoo.c��m] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20�10 9:20 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Fw: Help improve coverage in C upertino, CA Hello, I live in Cupertino and have horrible wireless connection. I would love to see a new tower or something go up to help my reception. It is a shame to continue with AT&T knowing that I cannot use my phone at home. BTW - isn't there a headquarters in Cupertino? I find that hilarious, because the residents in Cupertino are the one's who can't use their own phone in the city c�f the headquarters. Kind Regards, Tejel Nott LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/1/753 80b ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: AT&T <att@em.wireless.att-mail.com> To: TEJEL P NOTT <tpate1079@yahoo.com> Sent: Wed, September 8, 2010 7:13:10 AM Subject: Help improve coverage in Cupertino, CA View on Mobile Device � View in Web Browser � ___.�.r---------- AT&T is working hard to improve �►ireless coverage in and around the Monte Vista area in Cupertino, c;alifornia. Your voice will help bring a better wireless service sooner by supporting a new cell site in Cupertino. 1 2-52 X _w�_ � ---°------'--"- � How can you help? Please either attend the hearing ��n September 14th at 6:45 P.M. at the City of Cuaertino Community HaIL 10350 Torre Avenue, or email Senior City Planner Colir� ]ung at ColinJ@cupertino.org to voice your support for better wirE�less coverage and approving the proposed cell site in the Monte Vista area of Cupertino, California. Please feel free to share this infoi with your friends, neighbors and family members. AT&T want�; all of our customers to enjoy the convenience, safety and security of quality wireless service now, and for many years to come. Your su��port will make a big difference. Thank you for your contin ued loyalty! contact us privacy.policY This email was sent to: t�ate1079C�vahoo.com Unsubscribe. You have received this email because you are a wireless customer of AT&T. If you have any questions about how AT&T collects, uses and protects your personal information as a wireless customer, please visit our Privacy Policy at att.com/�rivacy. If �•ou no longer wish to receive future advertising emails from AT&T, please click here to unsubscribe. O 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property, All rights reserved, AT&T, AT&T logo and all other marks contained herein are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property 3nd/or AT&T affiliated companies. AT&T Mobility, 1055 Lenox Park Blvd, Atlanta, GA 30319-5309, United States of America. 2 2-53 Colin Jung From: Rahman, Azam [arahman@viss�.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10:18 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Lack of ATT coverage in MonteVista area Hello Colin, I live on Kirwin Lane and have poor to none ATT signal. The� signal becomes almost non-existent as I drive down McClellan towards MV. I have argued with ATT about this and they have infect provided me with a microcell to have a signal in my home. I support the effort to get a better signal in our'Silicon Valle�r' area. Azam Rahman VISA Inc VIP Systems & Middleware Off — 650-432-4695 Cell — 650-740-8964 1 �-54 Colin Jung From: Neelu Ghaderi [waterlily11@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20' 0 10:21 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: AT&T wireless coverage Dear Mr. Jung, I am writing in support of better wireless coverage in the (:upertino area(surrounding Monta Vista High School) in response to a text message I just received regarding this m��tter. My parents live there and the reception is terrible; I usually have to stand by a window to talk on my cell phone there and even then often have a poor connection and end up having to have my friends call the landline. Even sendin�� text messages can be a challenge. It also prevents me from really using my mobile-to-mobile minutes to talk to them wF en they are home so I have to use my peak minutes to call their landline during the day. Our service is so weak that my family is looking to change their wireless carrier once our contract ends later this year. We had originally signed up with AT&T as I had wanted to c et the Iphone but since service is poor at my current apartment in Oakland. I never made the switch since I just became due for an upgrade and am not sure how much longer I can tolerate the poor service with AT & T. If you cc�uld help to add a new tower or find other means of improving the cell phone reception it would be much appreciated as even if my family ends up changing their carrier, at least those who visit them will have improved cell phone reception. Thank you, Neelufar Ghaderi 1 2-55 Colin Jung From: anand naik [anaik3@gmail.com) Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20�10 10:26 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Re: better AT&T wireless cover�ge in Cupertino I fully support the idea that AT&T needs to provide be�ter wireless coverage in Cupertino, especially around the MontaVista high school. Thanks, � -anand naik (resident of cupertino for 13 years) i 2-56 Colin Jung From: Shih-Hsiung Wang [structors@��ahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20� 0 12:55 PM To: Colin Jung Cc: owners@astoriacupertino.org Subject: Fw: Help improve coverage in C upertino, CA Hi, Colin: I just received this e-mail from AT&T. You may receive several letters from AT&T customers for the next several days who simply support the support the improvement of the wireless coverage without knowing the e:xact pole locations. Please also include this e-mail in the your staff report if iYs appropriate. Thank you Allen Wang --- On Wed, 9/8/10, AT8�T <att(a�em.wire/ess.att-mail.com> wrote: From: AT&T <attCa�em.wireless.att-mail.com> Subject: Help improve coverage in Cupertino, CA To: "CHAOWEN FU" <structorsna.yahoo.com> Date: Wednesday, September 8, 2010, 7:10 AM View on Mobile Device � View in Web Browser . 1irr.� ' , � � � ��fl't)'�G' POkaSf1�+� � `�`_�'"'��,../"'� � � � s . � .�i� � �" ! AT&T is working hard to impr��ve wireless coverage in and around the Monte Vista area i�i Cupertino, California. Your voice will help bring a better w:reless service sooner by supporting a new cell site in CL pertino. 1 2-57 EXISTIlVG : ;r� PR4POSED tree pote How can you help? Please either attend the hearing on September 14th at 6:45 P.M. at the Citv of Cupertino Com�nunitv Ha11,10350 Torre Avenue, or email Senior City Planner Colin Jung at ColinJ(a�cupertino.org to voice your support for better wireless coverage and approving the proposed cell site in the Monte Vista area of Cupertino, California. Please feel free to share this inf �rmation with your friends, neighbors and family members. AT&T wants all of our customers to enjoy the convenience, safet;� and security of quality wireless service now, and for many years to come. Your support will make a big difference. Thank you for your continued l��yalty! contact us privacypolicy This email was sent to: structors(a� Unsubscribe. You have received this email because you are a wireless customer of AT&T. If you have any questions about how AT&T collects, uses and protect� your personal information as a wireless customer, please visit our Privacy Policy at att.com/arivacy. If ��ou no longer wish to receive future advertising emails Z 2-58 Colin Jung From: Kaz [golfandtennis@mac.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20�10 12:48 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: Please improve wireless coverage in Cupertino Attachments: photo. PNG Hi, It's great to hear that ATT is thinking about increasing the wireless coverage in Cupertino. It would be fantastic if this happens. I have attached a screenshot of the reception I get at 10160 Parkwood Dr #5, Cupertino, CA 95014. I only get one or two bars and hope ATT wireless will get this improved. Thank you, Kaz 408-406-5794 1 2-59 __... _.. . ..._.. i - 1�,I��r1� ��d,�g,r �' ,, � �. � � -� � � :: �e �` , . _ _ _ _ __ �� if'��`� �;�� F�i�� '��ffi��:�`�� ..� �� ,� '4 ! - ,�.. � �'� ,� �� *r , �.�:.. * ,� �, . � � � � _.. � ._.._�. � � G .. . :.. . . S : ...- . - _ .: � � '�' .��.;...... .a < 7 '� � ur�,s�,,,t� e:.�Jn . `�I LT"��Zr'� � .._.1...��-..__ .._.._ _ .� - ...,..a.,1., ��k��k� d�� ; ��f��h�r� I��t�� ' , �� , ,. f � �. . _ _ ._.... .,..- :.a,: . ..�.�-,... . •�a . r,., ..� . i ' fi ?^. T , . . , .,_,,.r�i. 2' .�+?� , � . � � .. � � � ' .. . . ' � _ t � �� . • l� . �cff -.. � �� f ,� •V � ~� � - . 1 � �� '�� . - . � 1 l�#iliti�� .:� ,,; iT't�r�� ' ��p �t�r�� etti� :;, � yY. i i i � i �-=.�.-.a.�axx:^-en., � • ; , . .. ....... ._... ..... ._.,..e:.,.__.e.w � a � t :'.. � � �l�Re� � ": ... I � . . . . . �. � �� ` . � a � � : � � � I a i � . M; � � � �,�� ,�.�a��, �l�a�C� ��I��r +��r�#��t� � _ _ __ � � � � � � �� ; � �� ; �- ... ,: .� , �_ : � � �.� �,_,. _ ..�. _...��.v......�..� _._...� _.._ _ _ P'��,� ��i� ��afari iP'��d Colin Jung From: Robinson Liaty, Karen [krobinscn@kpmg.com] . Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20'10 12:32 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: Support for improved wireless c�verage in Cupertino I am in full and total support of improving wireless cc►verage in and throughout the Monte Vista/Cupertino area with the new cell site. ��P,�2 �o�i`tdQ�t .�i� KPMG LLP 500 E Middlefield Road Mountain View, CA 94043 650 404 5367 (Direct) 650 284 2164 (eFax)� krobinson@kpm�.com *'"`'` ANY TAX ADVICE IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS NO'� INTENDED OR WRITTEN BY KPMG TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY A CLIENT OR ANY OTHER PER:�ON OR ENTITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF (i) AVOIDING PENALTIES THAT MAY BE IMPOSED ON ANY TAXPAYI=R OR (ii) PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING TO ANOTHER PARTY ANY MATTER�� ADDRESSED HEREIN. *"* Any advice in this communication is limited to the conclusions specifically set forth herein and is based on the completeness and accuracy of the stated facts, assum��tions and/or representations included. In rendering our advice, we may consider tax authorities that are subjec�t to change, retroactively and/or prospectively, and any such changes could affect the validity of our advice. W�: will not update our advice for subsequent changes or modifications to the law and regulations, or to the judicial and administrative interpretations thereof. The advice or other information in this document was prepared for the sole benefit of KPMG's client and may not be relied upon by any other person or organization. KP VIG accepts no responsibility or liability in respect of this document to any person or organization other than KPIAG's client. *******************************************i**************** The information in this email is confidenti��l and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Acc:ess to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended rE�cipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. When addres:�ed to our clients any opinions or 1 �-61 Colin Jung From: Jon Higashiuchi [higashiuchi@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 12:19 PM To: Colin Jung Hi Colin, I received the email from AT&Tand the cell site propos�xl. Since I have an iPhone, I'm stuck with AT&T until Verizon can get in the act. The service here at home (Cc stleton St.) is very poor, for calling ns well ns accessing the Internet. We need better coverage although it is nc t clenr to me whether ca tower in the Monte Vista area will benefit me. Thanks, <' )))'< Jon 1 2-62 Colin Jung From: Chetan Surpur [chetan51@gm�il.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20�10 12:05 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: Cupertino AT&T Coverage I support improving the AT&T wireless signal in the Cupertino area. � 1 i-63 Colin Jung From: Aparna [aps1225@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 12:16 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: I support At&T Dear Colin, I completely support the cell tower to support the cominunity. Regards, Aparna 1 2-64 Colin Jung From: Susan Davis [susan davis@me.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20'10 12:13 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: yes to AT&T tower Hi there, As a long time resident, and tax payer of Cupertino, I'd like to request you vote in support of the AT&T tower at the hearing on Sept 14th. I'm also a customer of AT&T, and knowing how a signal can be dropped in "dead zones" I think it's great that AT&T wants to put a tower in the area. Think about emergency 911 calls that may be dropped, not available, or poor reception. That alone should be reason to Ok the tower. Plus with the "tree camouflage" my fanily makes a game out of identifying towers. They are not as intrusive, and kind of "blend into the background". Please vote in support of this new tower. Thank you for your time, The Davis Family 853 Lonna Lane Cupertino, CA 95014 1 2-65 Colin Jung From: Shabbir Nomanbhoy [shabbir.noinanbhoy@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 201 ) 12:01 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: att coverage . Hello Colin Thanks for doing this. yes we badly need improved cov�;rage. In my home there is one small corner where I can get/make calls without drops. I may be willing to get a tower installed on my property; which is on a hill) for some consideration. Have att call me at 408-996-8786 if interested. Shabbir Nomanbhoy 11254 mt crest place cupertino 1 2•-66 Colin Jung From: Allison Kreft [allisonk@mac.con�] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20'10 11:51 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: AT8�T coverage in Cupertino CE, Please put up a cell tower in Cupertino, CA (Nonta Vista area) The coverage there is horrible, and it would be great to be able to use iphones (through AT&T). There's nothing worse then not having my cell phone service in cupertino, right near Monta Vista Highschool at my parents house. Especially since Cupertino is also the home of Apple. Thanks, Allison Kreft 408.813.0647 � 1 2-6� Colin Jung From: Janet Verson [jverson@gmail.a�m] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 11:45 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Wireless Reception Hi Colin: I live right behind Monte Vista High School. I have hc�rrible wirless reception. If someone calls me and I'm not standing at the exact spot where I get coverage the pho:�e won't even ring. When I make calls from my cell phone I'm always getting only partial conversations. What can be done to improve this? Thanks for your help. Sincerley, Janet 1 �-68 Colin Jung From: Waliace Su [bbj2004@yahoo.cc�m] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 11:38 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: i vote for the new AT&T wireles � installation at Monta Vista neighboughood We are a long time Cupertino resident in the Monta Vi �ta neighboughood (behind the Regnart Elementary School) and long time AT&T wireless customer. We h�d serious reception issues with AT&T wireless services and as it has become a really bad issue not being able t� receive and place cell ca11s. This could be an issue when the local government puts the reserve-911 calls t�� its resident under emergency situations as well. We need the improved cell reception badly. Wallace & Amy Su 1 ` 2-69 Colin Jung From: Veronica Lentfer [vlentfer@gm� il.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20�10 11:28 AM To: Colin Jung Cc: Jim Lentfer Subject: better cell phone coverage in C�apertino Hills Hello Mr Jung: I understand that Cupertino is reviewing a request to increase AT&T Cell phone coverage in Cupertino/Monta Vista area. This is strongly needed and long overdue. We have liv�;d in the Cupertino Foothills (near Linda Vista park) for over 6 years and have put up with poor coverage the entire time. We need additional support for safety and economic re �sons. 1. Safety Several years ago there was a fire at Linda Vista park. We could see the firefighters with hoses from our second floor bedroom. I learned that communications were difEcult because of lack of coverage there as well as in the area on the top of Montebello road. Safety personnel n�;ed better coverage to do their jobs and protect our homes. My children attend Kennedy middle school and have c�11 phones yet often we don't hear each other calling because the call goes to voicemail due to poor coverag�;. This is a safety and communications problem for my f�mily. The coverage was also poor at Lincoln Elementary sch�ol which made it difficult to arrange for last minute carpool changes and playdates. The coverage is poor at our local swim club, The Cupertino Hills Swim and Racquet club. When swim practice changes my children often have trouble reaching me b;� phone. This is a problem for us. 2. Economic As working parents and taxpayers we take advantage o f technology so that we can be with our kids as much as possible. I work from home as a marketing consultant. The cell coverage at my home is up and do ,�vn. I am often dropped while in the middle of an important conference call. Better cell coverage would improve my ability to consult from home part time and also be available for my children. Can you imagine making your daily ca11s for the city of Cupertino while standing by a second story window in order to complete your business? I have an iPhone 4. We live in a city where the headquaxters of Apple Computer is located. Why don't we support this leading global technology company? What message does this send? Aren't there hundreds o:�cities that would love to have Apple's business? Please approve the plan to increase AT&T coverage in Cupertino. i i-70 Thank you, Veronica and Jim Lentfer 22024 Baxley Court Cupertino, CA 95014 408-252-6452 home 408-464-5705 (Veronica's cell if it's a good coverage d,�y) 650-387-1496 (Jim's cell which has good coverage in his PALO ALTO office only) z 2-71 Colin Jung From: Yuwei Shi [yuwei.shi@gmail.corn] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20' 0 11:16 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: ATT Wireless I'm in support of the proposed ATT tree pole to improve the wireless signal reception in the Monta Vista area. I'm a resident in the area, and has been an ATT Wireless user for several years. The weak to no signal is one of the few pains living in this area. Please kindly consider my petition. Thank you. Yuwei Shi (21722 Columbus Ave) 1 L-7Z Colin Jung From: Dennis Tsao [underwater man(�yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 2:26 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: Fw: Help improve coverage in C:upertino, CA Hi Colin, I currently live near Linda Vista Park and the AT&T receptio i is very poor---very weak voice signal and almost no 3G coverage. I agree AT&T should improve the signal coverag� in Monta Vista area. I totally support it. Thanks, Dennis Tsao ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: AT&T <att@em.wireless.att-mail.com> To: DENNIS TSAO <underwater man@yahoo.com> Sent: Wed, September 8, 2010 7:10:33 AM Subject: Help improve coverage in Cupertino, CA View on Mobile Device � View in Web Browser Q _._....—._----------- AT&T is working hard to improve wireless coverage in and around the Monte Vista area in Cupertino, �alifornia. Your voice will help bring a better wireless service sooner ty supporting a new cell site in Cupertino. 1 2-73 Colin Jung From: Andy Gottlieb (andygottlieb@grriail.com) Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20�10 11:17 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Tree pole for better wireless co��erage I very much support this proposal. Given all the Apple employees in Cupertino, anything we can do to help with AT&T cell coverage is greatly appreciated. Respectfully Andy Gottlieb 10250 Palo Vista Rd • 1 2-74 Colin Jung From: 4088577045@txt.att.net Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 3:40 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: Cupertino Mv Area I agree we need bettr service in monta vista i psrt of movement u can get mv students to be part of petition This mobile text message is brought to you by AT&T 1 �-75 Colin Jung From: Anil Surpur [asurpur@gmail.cori) Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:12 PM To: Colin Jung Cc: Anil Surpur Subject: Better AT&T wireless coverage in Cupertino/Monta Vista area. Dear Colin, I am resident of Cupertino and own a home on Kirwin lane (intersection of Stelling and McClellan). we use AT&T wireless service and have 4 cell phones at home . The signal quality at home is very poor and pathetic. I;;pent almost $250 per month for both voice and data plans. But, quality is very poor and has been complaining to AT&T to imrpove their service in Cupertino area especially Monta Vista area where coverage is very po��r. I support AT&T effort to improve the wireless coverage in my area if they are planning to deploy additional antennas, receiver equipments etc. Please let me know if I need to do anything else to sup��ort this effort. Thanks, Anil Surpur 7630 Kirwin Lane Cupertino, CA 95014 408-646-3067 1 �;-7 6 Colin Jung From: Bill Harrison [bharrison@compliancebridge.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20'10 4:44 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: Better AT&T Colin, Please support tower improvement for better Cupertino coverage. Bill Harrison 22015 Creekside Ct. Sent from my iPhone 1 L-77 Colin Jung From: Lmbyteme [Imbyteme@aol.com� Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20' 0 5:22 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: ATT coverage I am voicing my support for better wireless coverage and ap �roving the proposed cell site in the Monte Vista area of Cupertino California. Please support it. Thanks, Lisa Mulhair 10337 Glencoe Drive Cupertino, CA 1 L -78 Colin Jung From: Keith Kreft [keithkreft@never-search.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20' 0 6:06 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: AT&T Coverage Colin, I urge you to support our getting better AT&T wireless cover3ge in Cupertino. I find it unbelievable that our cell phone service is this bad considering we are in Silicon Valley. I think these tree poles are a great idea Sincerely, Keith Kreft 10843 Wilkinson Ave Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 605-5860 1 2-79 Colin Jung From: Mukesh Garg (mukeshgarg@corcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:30 PM To: Colin Jung Cc: Mukesh Garg Subject: Better Wireless Coverage Hi, Mr Jung: I am sending you this email because I am informe�� that you can do something about this matter. I am Mukesh Garg and I live in Cupertino. My are�� high school is Monta Vista. I would like to inform you that I would like to have better cell phone covE�rage in Monta Vista area for kids security reasons. Please expedite this at the earliest. Please let me know if there is something I can do �s a resident of Cupertino. Regards, --mukesh 1 L—HO Colin Jung From: Seetaram and Padma Vemulap��lli [ram_padma@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 8:45 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: We support AT&T Cellular Tree Pole Hi, We live in 10225 Orange ave in Monta Vista area and we strongly support this proposal. Right now, the signal strength is close to zero and this project will help us get best signal for the safety and security of the residents. Thanks Vemulapalli 1 2-$� Colin Jung From: Ray Chong [raymond_h_chong(�hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20' 0 9:06 PM To: Colin Jung Cc: Raymond Chong Subject: Support for AT&T pole in monta vista area Hello, I am writing to give my support to AT&T for irstalling a new tree pole for improving cell reception in the monta vista area. I feel that it is an important infrastructure upgrade, especially for safety purposes for families ir the monta vista and Lincoln school areas and for recreational bikers who pass through that area to access fremont older open space preserve or stevens canyon road. Thank you Sincerely, Raymond Chong Sunrise Drive, Cupertino � -�$ 2 Colin Jung From: Nat Nataraj [nat nataraj@yahoc�.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20' 0 11:26 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: AT&T cell phone tower Hello Colin, We would definitely like to see improved cell covei•age in the Monta Vista area. Calls are dropped even when I am passing by the area; further, I wo��ld like my children to be able to contact me from school if necessary. Regards, Nagamani i 1 83 . Colin Jung From: jay menon [jm.menon@gmail.cc m] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 11:26 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: Fwd: Help improve coverage in ��upertino, CA To City Planner / whomsover it may concern This is to record that i totally support this effort to install new cell site(s) in Cupertino. The present coverage from AT&T Wireless is poor and spotty and while driving one runs into several dead spots where ongoing calls drop or new calls fail to connect. Near my residence , areas of dead spots are at the inter� ection of Stevens Creek and Peninsula Avenue. Other areas with insufficient coverage (that i know o fl�re : Home Depot and surroundings on De Anza Boulevard S. Blaney Avenue and Bollinger (Wallgreens and surroundings) Jay Menon Property-tax-payer and Cupertino resident 10293 Noel Ave Cupertino , CA 95014 . cell : 408-685-7081 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: AT&T <a.tt v .em.wireless.att-mail.com> Date: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 7:10 AM Subject: Help improve coverage in Cupertino, CA To: JAYAKRISHNA MENON <jm.menon(a��mail.co�n> View on Mobile Device � View in Web Browser x � ------ 1 �'-84 Colin Jung From: Jim Vincent [james.h.vincent@c mail.com] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 12:20 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Better AT&T Wireless Coverage� Cupertino City Council Cupertino as the home of Apple Computer should provide superior AT&T wireless service for Cupertino residents. I live next to Regnart school on Yorkshire D�•. I hope the City will approve the proposed cell site in the Monte Vista area of Cupertino, California. James Vincent 1139 Yorkshire Dr i �-85 Colin Jung From: subu sankaran [subu.ind@gmai .com] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 12:59 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Improve ATT coverage in Cupertino Hi Colin, I fully support having the "Tree Tower" as proposed by ATT this will improve the coverage in the Monta Vista Area. We moved to this area just because my daughter goes t�� Monta Vista, what a shame, there is no cell phone coverage in the land of "Apple". More than anything, if' my kid wants to reach me she cannot (well everyone can argue you should switch to Verizon Wireless .... wf�ll who will pay for the discontinuation charges on 4 lines, and you dont get iPhones), because there is no A"CT coverage. 95014 is a very coveted zip code, but with such poor cc�mmunication system, I hope something can be done about it. Thank You & Best Regards Subu Sankaran +1 408 824 0106 (cell) +1 408 454 8511 (google) Skype: subu_sankaran Yahoo: subu ind G'Talk: subu.ind 1 L-86 Colin Jung From: Rachel Prescott [rachhaug49@�:omcast.net] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 7:52 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: AT&T in Monta Vista area Hi, I live in the Riverside St.Andrews neighborhocd and I have AT&T and get no service whatsoever at home. My husband and I are both paying monthly charges for our service (he has an I- phone, which is useless here) and are angry at having to pay for no service. Please do something! Install a cell tower nearby so we can join the human race with cell coverage at home. Thanks, Rachel Prescott 22447 Balustrol Ct Cupertino 1 2-$� Colin Jung From: Finn Kate [kfinn@mac.com] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:53 AM To: Colin Jung Cc: Finn Kate Subject: Proposed New Cell Tower for ATB�T Hello, Mr. ]ung: I'm writing to express my support for the proposed cell tower. Anything to improve AT&T's coverage in Cupertino! Both my daughters attend Monta Vista High School, and it's nearly impossible to make or receive cell calls from the campus or from anywhere within a several block radius around that area. It makes it very frustrating to coordinate carpool arrangements, etc. Sincerely, Kathleen E. Finn 21361 Milford Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 � i L-HH Colin Jung From: Aswath lyengar [aswathiyengar(�yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 :i:07 AM To: Colin Jung Subject: Better AT 8� T Wireless nefinrork in Monta Vista Area. Dear Colin J, We support your proposal to improve the qualit�r of better wireless net work. Thanks. Aswath & Kausalya. 1 2-89 Colin Jung From: Andy Fang [andy.fangus@gmai .com] Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 20'10 6:04 PM To: Colin Jung Subject: i want better wireless coverage n cupertino Sent from my iPhone 1 �.-90 �. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS 1 CONCREfE 2 BOLTS INSTALLED IN CONCRETE 3 CONCREfE MOMENT—RESISTING SPACE FRAME 4 REINFORCING STEEL AND PRESTRESSING STEEL 5.1 ALL STRUCTURAL WELDING 5.2 WELD TESTIW6 DUCTRE MOMENT—RE51ST1NG SiEEL FRAME 5.3 WELDING REINFORCING STEEL 6 HIGH—STRENGTH BOLTING 7 STRUCTURAI MASONRY 8 REINFORCED GYPSUM CONCREfE 9 INSULATING CONCREfE FlLL 10 SPRAY—APPLJED FlREPROOFlNG 11 DEEP FQUNDATIONS (PIUNG, DRILLED dt GUSSONS) 12 SHOTCRETE 13.1 VERIFY SOII CONDRIONS ARE SUBSTANiIALLY IN CONFORAUWCE WfTH THE SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT 13.2 VERIFY THAT FOUNDATION D(CAVATIONS IXTEND TO PROPER DEPTH AND BEARING STRATA 13.3 PROVIOE SOIL COMPACTION TESf RESULTS. DEPTH OF FlLL, RELATIVE DENSIT`f, BEARING VALUES 13.4 PROVIDE SOIL D(PANSION TEST RESULTS, EXPANSION INDDf, RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FOUNOATIONS, ON— GRADE ROOR SI.AB DESIGN fOR EACH BUILDING SfTE 14 SMOKE CONTROL SISTEM 15 SPECWI. CASES (OESCRIBE) 16 OFF—SITE FABRICATION OF BUILDING COMPONENTS 17 OTHER SPECIAL INSPECTIONS AS REOUIREU BY DESIGNER VICIN MAP � � 99� iZ . RI�7'2df � _� � � . � � ��* � --- - ,� ` •� -�. _ ' t__,_.._. _._ � , __ ,.., ,_.._ ._ , : + , Geaodda �ve � '• _., ..... _ ;, , ;`' 8 : � : � _ _... _.....__ ', �,. � t �._� , � k s� � LomitdAYe � `,k _._..... � � ---._. ; , `:�t _ .. _ ...:. �: � 1 � �: ;x , '� � ' ; x.i �'-_.. � x �'---. � � _..__ .---. _ � .. _- SI�TE _., � ;�,� � _. _ ,. �; � �`-; _ .. ..,� . � �y ��f _ _ � �: s � � x i kt 7 � � r � � ��,� ,__. _. ___ _..._ ._._ _ __ � �i Tve : x i Q .. _.._ . ._ y Wc � f ,� f. �' i� f i _. _..... � ! �Q4: , * r'j _ _.__ �„. ; y�, ��:, � 1�0113R �F i �X : �. T � � � ----- - _ _ , .� 2�� est inc . . , ...._ _ . , . �. ..,. <, . �. ..� �� „ � . �.�., _:- .�_.�� ..,�', .:- a MePQOta 92(168NX4TE , TeWAI�s CUPERTINO C N 3242-A NOVEMBER DRIVE R E S U LTS WAY CU PERTI NO, CALI FORN IA 95014 CONSULTANT TEAM CLIENTS REPRESENTATIVE: ERICSSON INC. 6160 STONERIDGE MALL ROAD SUITE 400 P�ASANTON, CALIFORNIA 94588 CONSiRUC110N MANAGER: TIM LENCIONI PHONE: (916) 437-9119 TRILLIU�A CONSUI TINr 5912 BOLSA AVENUE: SUITE 202 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CAUFORNIA 92649 PHONE: (�14) 799-2000 StTE ACQU15R10N � ZONING: TOM JOHNSON PHONE: (714) 206-2879 RF ENGINE�2: HAKAN &4TIKHAN (AT&T) PHONE: (925) 300-6919 ARCHITECT: JEFFREY ROME AND ASSOCIATES 3 SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA SURE: 155 NEWPORT BEACH, CAL'FORNIA 92660 PHONE: (702) 324-4338 FAX: (949) 760-3931 CONTACT: ROBIN NELSON LAND SURVEYOR: CAL VADA SURVEYING, INC. 411 JENKINS CIRCLE, SUITE 205 CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92880 PHONE: (951) 280-9960 FAX: (951) 280-9746 COMACT: RAMON GONZAIEZ DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY APPLICANT: ATdcT MOBILRY 4420 ROSEWOOD DRNE PLEASANTON, CAUFORNIA 94588 OWNER: ECI iW0 RE5ULT5 LLC. 1301 SHOREWAY ROAD; SUITE 258 BELMONT, CAUFORNIA 94002 CONTACT: ANDREW BROWN PHONE: (650) 292-4100 OTHER ON—SRE TELECOM FACILITIES: NONE PROJECT ADDRESS: �ccCCenoc o�onr� uii i��orn. LATITUDE: LON6ITUDE: LAT/LONG lYPE: IXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED PROJECT ARFA: PROPOSED TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: PROPOSEO OCCUPANCY: EXISTING TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: IXISTING OCCUPANCY: JURISDICTtON: couNn: RESUITS WAY CUPERTINO, GWFORNIA 95014 3T 19' 10.18" N 127 03' 09.82" W NAD-83 P (ML) 935 SQ. FT. TYPE V-8 U NOT APPLICABLE Nor ,accPUCna� Cf1Y OF CUPERTINO SANTA CL4RA PROJECT DESCRIPTION ATdcT MOBIUTY PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE AND MAINTAIN AN UNMANNED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACIUTY. THIS FACILITY WILL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: • INSTALL A PROPOSED MONOPINE WITH (12) PROPOSED ATdcT ANTENNAS WITHIN THE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE. • INSTALL (24) RUNS OF 7/8"0 COAXIAL CABLE ANO (12) TMA'S. • INSTALL ATdcT OUTDOOR EOUIPMENT CA81NET5 MOUNTED ON A CONCREfE PAD WITHIN A CMU WALL ENCL05URE. • UNDERGROUND UTILJTY RUNS FOR ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE. LEGAL DESCRIPTION BEING ALL OF PARCEL 3, AS SHOWN UPON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP WHICH MAP WAS FlLED FOR RECORO IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON APRIL 12, 1979 IN BOOK 439 OF MAPS AT PAGES 12 AND 13 AND BEING A PORTION OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN OOCUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 14, 1975 �N BOOK 8662 AT PAGE 46 IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY AND BEING MORE PARTICUTARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LJNE OF SAID PARCEL NORTH 00' 01' 00" WEST 241.44 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN SAID 800K 8662 AT PAGE 46; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS NORTH 00' 00' 33" WEST 378.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89' S6' 46" EAST 274.02 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID IANDS; THENCE AIONG SAID LINE SOUTH 19' O6' 48' EAST 335.47 FEEf TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY UNE OF SAID PARCEL SOUTH 19' O6' 48' EAST 293.23 FEEf TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SPJD PARCEL; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL NORTH 82' 24' S1 ° WEST 261.05 FEEf; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 89" 57' 24" WEST 220.99 FEEf TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SHEET INDEX T-1 TITLE SHEET A-0 SITE PLAN A-1 ENLARGED SITE PLAN A-1.1 TREE REMOVA� PLAN A-2 NORTH & SOUTH ELEYATIONS A-3 EAST ELEVATION C-1 SITE SURVEY (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) APPLICABLE CODES ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOILOWiNG APPUCABLE CODES: CAUFORNIA BUILDING CADE, 2007 EDITION, BPSED ON THE 2006 INTERNAT10NAl. BUIIDING CODE CAUFORNIA FlRE CODE, 2007 EDITION, BASED ON THE 2006 INTERNATIONAL FlRE CODE, CAUFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, 2007 EDITION, BASED ON THE 2006 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 2007 EDRION, 8l�SED ON THE 2006 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE CAUFORNIA ELECiRICAL CODE, 2007 EDR10N, BASED ON THE 2005 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, 2007 EDITION. _� IN THE EVENT OF CONFLICT, THE M05T RESTRICTNE CO�E SHALL PREVAIL ACCESSIBILITY DISCLAIMER THIS PROJECT IS AN UNOCCUPIED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACIU?Y IS EXEMPT f'ROM DISABIED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS. SCALE THE DRAWING SCALES SHOWN IN THIS SET REPRESENT THE CORRECT SCALE ONLY WHEN THESE DRAWINGS ARE PRINTED IN A 24"X36" FORMAT. IF THIS DRAWING SEf IS NOT 24"X36", THIS SEf IS NOT TO SCALE. �J RA Jsffrep Roms � Assoctates� Inc. A►chlt�ctun k Telecommunicationa 3 San Joaquln Piaza, Suifs 155 N�wpart Bwch, Cali(omia 92660 Phone: (949) 760-3929 Fax: ( 949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SEf OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO ATBcT MOBILITY IS STRICTLY PROHI8ITED. STAMP ``��.� aRCy� J '1 Rq� �r � * �_�2�8�6 * fA �� ,� � FEB. 2��" �P qT f Q� CAUE�� PREPARED FOR � at&t 4420 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACQ. & ZONING DATE tKII,J,U1V l:M UAIt ATdcT CM DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME NOVEMBER DRIVE PROJECT NUMBER CN3242—A RESULTS WAY CUPERTINO, CAUFORNIA 95014 SANTA CU1RA COUNTY DRAWING DATES 02/10/09 PRELIMINARY ZD REVIEW (P1) O6/08/09 DESIGN CHANGE (P2) u7/02�09 FlNAL ZD'S (P3) 01/26/10 SITE RELOCATION (P4) OS/10/10 1009. ZD'S (P5) 05/21/10 CUENT COMMENTS (P6) O6/10/10 CLIENT COMMENTS (P7) OS/16/10 PLANNING COMMENTS (PS) OB/23/10 CUENT COMMENTS (P9) OB/31/10 REVISED ANTENNA COUNT (P10 RFDS REVISION LEVEL 1.6 SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET N O 0 � w m � � z �- U w � � � a a � � SITE PLAN KEYNOTES 1 PROPOSED ATdcT ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON A PROPOSED MONOPINE WffHIN A PROPOSED ATdcT EOUIPMENT ENCLOSURE; SEE SHEET A-1. O 2 PROPOSED ATdrT 22'-0" X 42'-6' LEASE AREA WRH OUTDOOR E�UIPMENT WITHIN A 6'-0" HIGH CMU RETAINING WAIL ENCLOSURE TO MATCH IXISTING; SEE SHEET A-1. 3 IXISTING U1ILITY POLE MOUNTED TRANSFORMER AND PROPOSED ATdcT POWER SOURCE. 4 p(ISTING UTILITY POIE dc PROPOSED ATdcT TELCO POC. 5 PROP05ED 5'-0" WIOE ATdcT UNDERGROUND POWER k TELCO CONDUIT ROUTE. DISTANCE 318'-0't. TELCO CONDUIT SIZE TO BE 4" DIA. SCH. 40 PVC. POWER CONDUIT SIZE TO BE SPECIFlED BY SERVING UTIUTY COMPANY; SEE DEfAIL 2/A-1. 6 PROPOSED 12'-0' WIOE AT&T ACCESS ROUTE TO SITE. TO BE CHANGED AFTER DEVELOPMENT OF SITE. �NCni ct s iu i o A3 � 20' KATHR IN 742-264 70 1 7 A4 20' KATHREIN 74 -264 70 1 7 B1 260' KATHREIN 742-264 70 �p 7 B2 NORTH 2fiQ KATHREIN 742-264 70 � p 7 B3 WEST 260' KATHREIN 742-264 70 1 7 B4 260' KATHREIN 742-264 70 10 7 8 C1 140' KATHREIN 742-264 70 10 7 C2 SOUTH 140' KATHREIN 742-264 70 1 p 7 C3 W� 140' KATHREIN 742-264 70 10 7 8 C4 140' KAiHREIN 742-264 70 1 7 ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE SCHEDULE 2 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL LABOR TO INSTALL 30 RUNS OF COAX, 12 TMA'S AND 12 ANTENNAS. 2. ERICSSON TO PROVIDE ALL COAX, CONNECTORS, ANCILLARY EOUIPMENT (INCLUDING WEATHER STRIPPING, GROUND KITS, ETC.). 3. CONTRACTOR TO COLOR CODE ALL COAX. COLORED BANDS OF TAPE ON COAX IDENTIFY SECTOR, FREOUENCY, TECHNOLOGY, AND TRANSMIT GROUP AS FOLLOWS: 7 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ASPHALT PAVED PARKING. � (UNDER SEPARATE DEVELOPMENT). �� y ~��' � 'J \ � ��;� � .. �, �� X,��, SECTOR "A" _ 3 � • j 'j/! �,,-`"'�' ` �� f � �s''��-a�c .(-"� \ TX 1/RX 1 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 TX 6 8 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BUILDINGS. j� ;-- ..r' - 1-} � UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT . '/� �- /' r.� /� ty '� '' Y i r F ,�,.x. ' �; - GSM 1900 ( ) ,. � � �� . � � � � /�...- � s t „�,, � --- Z BROWN 26RWN/1 RED 2 ORANGE 20RG/1 RED 28RWN/2RED 20RG/2RED � _ �� -,� � ' ��. , � = x � .. �-�" �` ; ''� ' / TX 1 /RX 1 TX 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 TX 6 9 IXISTING BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY. � �� f �.✓ �-�� %`3i n ' "' !�`'�• \`� �" '�` � - . GSM B50 / -/� �„�-,,,�--i / g�p�yy '., �/,�„ J `, i�� /�� --- 3 BROWN 3BRWN/1RED 3 ORANGE 30RG/1RED 38RWN/2RED 30RG/2RED ,�''� , ..�� `�,� --`-%�� ' � � ( i�P ) � �' 1`` t � _ �. TX 1 /RX 1 TX 2/RX 2 �� i':�-_ -- / / � .. �• ' / ,: j�%- �, ' / ry,�', �., . . : `�-.= � �, - t` UMTS 1900 4 BROWN 4 ORANGE 10 D(ISTING PROPER1Y UNE. / .� ,� i � � y ( �� '' " '" l i�'"� � �'"`'� ` ,( TX 1 RX 1 TX 2 RX 2 �%� ��-' o ,. . r�. � �,�- ��'�.,; �� '�'� � -- UMTS 850 / / 11 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ACCESS DRNEWAY ANO FUTURE a j-� ,.. -' �- aOp' ..- =-- i l �. --,. .� ;�-s3 �; __ _- 5 BROWN 5 ORANGE 12'-0� WIDE ACCESS ROUTE. - . � - .. � EtP`��' - y i / � % �.� � � � � � ?. \� � , ... '� ��F � . ;t`' ��-- {�M1�' P _ _ ,��. ' � _� ` ' �i �} ...� � t �., . .�� •}-'� -'� / �'f� .,�.-�K�'� �` �� w w � • ,� %� - �. 5 g �.. � .... . , � " -� � ��.�'"' --5� ..�-,:�i '' � � ' � k �' � N� Ff � � �,�� / - �' �'� �s �IOSw .� j ' - � ✓ � �' �'S � �, �, � � - � SECTOR "8" , i. \ � ,-�-� ' �� .. _.. •, m \ Q .!`" '�_ /// � /';r- � � -%� �� %-�= ' �! -" `. ` • -'�� f � / i/�//,/ � TX 1 RX 1 TX 3 TX 2 RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 TX 6 \ � - t .� i ,.• i_... � , ` _. ' �I � � / / � �-"'"� /.Y -': j� i /��i . .� � � � �_ . - - �/ ' / � � � /C ' /.'� GSM 1900 �-",.. � �' � �. . �,� .- �� I '�i �l �,�� 2 YELLOW 2YEL/1 RED 2 BLUE 28LUE/1 RED 2YEL/2RED 28LUE/2RED �"�''� -' - t �' � y► � � � �� ' � ��,!� i// � , % -„�--� " -' % � 3 ' 'i �' '�� " � � ! � � �/ > / •' j'' � '' ; � � TX 1 RX 1 TX 3 TX 2 RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 1X 6 % • �' % / /.�I � / i / / , �j i � � �. / ..i� .�^-� / . j/ O� .�� i' 1'\r^`t_... I I � ;'/ � / GSM 850 � ,/i�„-�/ � -�-- �� `,./,. ,, �' 3 � � � r , �' � � j ' ', .� 3 YELLOW 3YEL/1 RED 3 BLUE 38LUE/1 RED 3YEL/2RED 3BLUE/2RED - � :. --��'� : ,_� .; . .,,.. - . , , , ''�.�., ,, .�,, s,r / ''" ,��/..i�� 6'''; � // :!'=' �i� � o \�„ ��` � f � r� TX 1/RX 1 TX 2/RX 2 .- . ''-� - _�'' -� / L-_ � � � 8 . _i ' ::� � � i �/ �� . . .� ..- ; ,.. ��i � � ;.�' ` ,.i � � ' f q � R' � � �' ` , ., � " . iy �33�:D'� / ' I_ � ,'� 4 YELLOW 4 BLUE /' L.; .. / � , �� ' ' %' ,/ _ � %� ' ' � �. _ , /%'/'� � �- r +! ' /'� /$IOSWALE ��'� �.i _.- - ,, �, � � 1 � _ �,` ��y '� � � � � .. � � � TX 1 /RX 1 TX /RX , ''.__ , � : UMTS 1900 : !, � � � i ��,� � ,,-' � `,� � � - .-', ,' ,..�e � i /,% / UMTS 850 2 . , � \ . ,. , -- �.' �•!' � : -'.�� / wr ,,. -' � � 'r - _�- ��.� � � , 1�_ `'-� 33 .5 �- i �r � .�� ,; 5 BLUE � , `,� ,� , ,�� , _,. . � , , �, - � �_- .: , � �, „Pl �° __- ---- - , _ ,�.- � � -, '� :r" / � 5 YELLOW 2 � � � �, � � � � �- ��;,.- _ � � ..�,,,,/-'`"� � _ / /' ' � � � r � 1 -':\ " ` �� / / � " i "- ' .. � , , . ,� l• . ' � r`�j ". / 3,. r � " �' � / � i \ �-('.�?` _ i i� ' i j / � , °j . y � ( - /�-''�. /�� '7 / � � ,-�,. .:. i�� , ,�\� 1� 1�C� �t`, �� $IOSW �4�' � � , � I� � � �.\�I� � � � ,` ..! , �r . � . r � �� . � . -.�.- .. , � _ _ � ,. - ;�, �3 ; - �' :,`. �-�'.�� 'k - ''� � • .. - , _- � . . . � . , . � .. �� .r � � i ,.. , r _ , , ,.,-- �.s --,.`''' / . .� S'' 'r '� �� ` � 9. � � � � I ---- /� � `� SECTOR "C" - .. , _.- � �j ,.�!'� '^ / � /..'` � ��iT.- �i , ''`l / �'�� ,` ,� �� i�/ �� . ' \i i , / +� , � i 1 �� J ; S. � �� `� i ,-�� L -y-. \ � 'I ,�, +�'"' �' / �! � � ' I�, � i i ' ! TX 1 RX 1 TX 3 TX 2 RX 2 TX 4 TX 5 1�( 6 / ,, �, r ,�� ( _ , � ` ..r �';i ,, � �3!-` �9� � ' �'' � ( � p';�rt' I � /.' �r" / / .. . . , � � . . \ � � , , GSM 1900 , i �3 .--' � �� - a. , i I � i /;--" �� % : �' t , - � ; , s -� °c' ,--- � }" ` -- i 2 VIOLET 2V10/1 RED 2 HITE 2WHT/1 RED ZVIO/2RED 2WHT/2RED , , p�� , � _ ... � � . ,. ,. , , I ( � (r�f :`r � .u� � � \� �- C''a � '%%�. � '' �'"' y � ✓ � '-T-,-,��r _ � . - .' l ` � '��--, '\ � � . .`,,, _ , ,� ,- / C�'- � �>. '_.l!'I 1 v y�' ' „� i � . � , i ' i � � -- ' I . �I � ' ,� Y � - I� �`��: � . �! , i in ��i�n i in .� �n t/rtn t in Y iN J IX O / � ;-r � \. ! �' ! 8 � ' � , , j Er�c,�!' �,,. ,��.. �,�,,�� !' � � � ' � � � � I . . � 32yF.$ ' � � 3::S � + ' G �'' � , - ; i i . I . . . _._., I i� :i . � i � Li L � � ��;\ k �' , , r_ " , _ _ '.. i � i ., � ( G '�� -'"`�% , _ �;� ; ; � i .- 1: .... .... ``----� ' F � I � - 3 VIOLET 3VI0/1RED 3 WHITE 3WHT/1RED 3VI0/2RED 3WHT/2RED a I I �/ i GSM 850 .�24 � �' .. � � � '�` , , 1 � (.'�� . i � � �/ � ',,\ �- : �' � / � / / � / , `� ��_ �.4 � 336 �Y I _ ' ?'!c F � TX 1 /RX 1 TX 2/RX 2 � � �I �J C' � - , � X ; i � i `.` `. J( .` �� f l _ , I( ,(:, ..�35.9 � � 'd36'"� i. �/ m r- e � n �4-�' •35�� i i' j I.� _, i j�� j I( I � i `� � ❑ UMTS 1900 4 VIOLET 4 WHITE ,� _� r. -',, � , �� , [ � : \ j r'�� ` �� - � � i ` .-- . .,9 �,..1 � ,- �� i � I i . I � i � ! ! � ✓ ' "� i � . , , . � � ,, � : ..a- � � . 1 1, i 'i � ' ,�t � / � - � _ �1.,� - _i '�� : I : � I _ TX 1 /RX 1 TX ;� s ,. r � 10 . � , ,� , - - , , . ' .� , r � ,: \ , � , , ' �, - - - � � , � , � , ` �, l' ` ; � '�. i Yi' i � '�'' �'- - _"_.. ---- =-' - -- - -- - - ---. UMTS 850 \ ` . , . ` j , ' / ,, J ,. ' `\ ,, ', !. , i i �' � � '`" ti 1 ' 1 � / �_-� _ -- - 5 VIOLET 5 WHITE .� � � ' . ; , - _. , , , , . _ � � , , � , .1 .`.�( '� `, • , � �, � � �. ..�_+. „ ; ; _- - ;� - I , ,-� : � �s � , /� ' �U1L '#O , , � .T , � :� , �� - _ � ��r�-� , .,. , „ _ , . , ,. _� . � . ., ,� � � �-'- i - � y � � � , � � ,. ' t , /� : i -- � � , . , . . . .. . ._ .� .... � \ , . 1 - x- , ., � � � : . . i .. , ; �, � ., �. _ . � � \ � , l � ,, `��, � \ � , •, `, '� \ �'� � '�" � \ , �-' '� '��Ga '"� ��''ti --- - - -- � �I// ._. � { , . � _. � ; �: � � � � -� , , a • � , � ` , . , , -- , '"'�-�'�.,: ,-- _ , i ' MIT�"1F" _ - ,; �..� • � , : � 7 � , '' \ \ t I � '.�.�- -..�'�� 1 ___ - - ' '�7:'_ , TC _ .- --- �' / ' -- - � � �• , ,. , ,. ,�'��,..0'� � ., ., . , . , ` 1��-- � " s. _ � ` �'__ ' 1 r 11 �� -- rr _. � -- a � � (' �',��", ` , \ \ - � � ,y _ _ "_: _ - ��; I ', �' t'. 11 �', ` , I i - -- _ i {. k �, '� � ;� •, � �; a,��" , i.__ !. ,' �� ' �' ; ` ' ' � i i 4. WHEN ANTENNA LINES ARE DIPLIXED, THE COLOR CODE OF THE HIGHEST FREQUENCY . _.. ..�f,.�.W.��, I _ � 1 � '� `�. � '' , '; � ` � -" � � ( - ' � -� I �' PREVAILS (I.E. UMTS DIPLEXED WITH TDMA SHOULD HAVE COIOR 4 BANDS . � . , y t -�� , � � ' �,�: , \ ` �� ° � (- I � : ! APN: 357-20-046 ! ' I � �"� i ; � APN: 357-20-041 � � , ; � I ' I ZONING: P ML ! � ��^+� � I, a 5. ALL ANTENNAS AND ANTENNA CABIE SHALL 8E FURNISHED BY ERICSSON INC. AND �r -�-'.! i ; i �! '` � -� �_ � ( ) �-�:� �� - � ZONING: P(ML) I, BUILDING 4 9 INSTALLED 8Y ANTENNA INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR. ;W��S� ._ �..- r ; 1 i , f ;J`rn � ti @ ( � _ � � � � � � � O � ` BIOSwALE (TYP)��_ � 1 �- �, g ',,° 2 � _ ` 3 9 BUILDING 5 !� = I 6. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF ANTENNA POLE MOUNTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT j 2 j.' r �, ' � I_; � � NE�II BUILDING C O o � P'� � i' � OEX FFE 343.8 � i� THE AZIMUTH AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS MATCH ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. ; � � ,. i : � � .. ; ; i - . �--I --1� FFE 336 s I � �3� - ; � 1 � � � ! � �� ' � � r � i ' � ' � ' � -` R � PAD 335 "n;, J � �� : ! � ALLOWABLE TOLERANCE: HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT = f5'; VERTICAL ALIGNMENT = tt'. : � �� , � � Y_ i ; I � � ��; i� i �_ �� ! �;� I�� 7. NSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHAIL PROVIDE ALL CONDUIT, CABLE TRAY, �� ANTENNA I J! ?' :' :. � ; i it �': '•. I I':. •;t i� I - I � � E X I S T i N G L O T U NE I i ' I _; 3 G R O U N O S, E f C. F O R C O M PLETE I NS T ALLATION OF ANTENNAS AND CABLES SHOWN AND �e _ : '{ � � � i 507'-2" _ _ _ ; ; � � I� � - - - � -- --- -- --;_ INTENDED AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLEfE OPERATING SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH R� '� I sSti � i� I� , ERICSSON INC. STANOARDS. - i , . .A p . 1 4 i ' � i � � ! ! : � � i _ 1 f - 3 2 ' . ._. .____ . . __._..�.-- -'---'�-- -- � � � � . .� � �' �� i �� j iR, i . � . . : ; I �� . . . . � . . . , . I � . . � E � : ! I . , -L -.�c.- - - . - : i i � /. ; � �� • � � ��; � � j I ' i � � I i i. ' j f ; I r _�_ - -- -.__ ___ _ - _--. - - - __s-- _. .. , I= � � % � � i , �� • � i i � � ';I � . 8. IN NO CASE SHALL THERE BE ANY MORE THAN 1W0 (2) 90' TURNS (OR EQUNALENT IN . ' , : ' ; . , : _,.. _ : . , _ . ` ., I ._ _ , _ __ - - - - _ _ , - _._ _ L - -- _..._._. ._ __. __ - � ,, ; � �� , � � � ! f. � � � : � � 7 • � I , •� ��, : �-T �- -� �- ,....�-�....�. : i a,` ; {.�, ' ! i 1 � :� ANY CONIINUOUS LENGTH OF CONDUIT BETWEEN PULL BOXES OR SIMILAR FEATURES. •, c � � � . ' � : : . ,. . ..._.. , � ��.. .! . .�S_. � I �' ._.._..�.__l" � I "�:�j. _ _ i i I � '�j� i � ;' I i I T i i � i �!`✓ 1 �� r'^ 7�� ; I ' i � i ` ' _ " �-'.` � � , t - - , I i : . - � � I i I I ' � ' � ; t : : � i..__. . � � � ; . . I � ; . I � � : . , ; -. .�! � � . 1 i . � � . . � � i . :'.�. . , . ' � �/ � .�.. .. . ... _ ?� � � � � ;,� ., , � � , , ,f ? I � : i : ; � , I I ( IL-� �3� 0 �� I i � I � i � j � : i ; � , � ' " ' ' ' � g. ANTENNA CONDUIT SHALL ONLY INCLUDE FACTORY-MADE LARGE RADIUS SWEEPS AT dQ�_PROPERIX:IJNE ` --------- � ' � ~� � I t � � � `'' I ;i � ��-r ALL CHANGES IN DIRECTION. SWEEP RADIUS SHALL BE 18" MINIMUM ABOVE GROUND - -r - � - - - � --I •� - - -��Q�4T�1D{E � - � PROPOSED OT IJNE---I �--EXISTING LOT LINE ': i I ;�! I i� i i; � ;, ;' ; i I, I I � i , 4 � i I i i ; � AND 36 MINIMUM BELOW GROUND. } i i i i � i ; , � �( I� � ��.� � �' I � f, � I I I i i i ;i ' � i i ; i i i � {�' I � ��. � � � � I f i � � i i ( i 1 i I i i � � I I i I I I � t i � i I � ii � i r � I � I �I �� .p � �: i' i i 10. CONDUIT SHALL 8E 3"m MINIMUM. ALL UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE SCHEDULE _ .._ . _. : ' _. �. .._ _ � �._ _t _ � .-_ _ _ - _ r _____.--._____, 40 PVC. ALL IXPOSED CONDUIT ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SHALL BE IMC OR RIGID -.<. --- -..:._. :_ ,_._ __: - �.--- __� _--• : ._,'J _ ,`-_��--_ �.... . �-. _---� "-�'-'--- 1 �-- �- GA�VANIZED. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT PROTECTED IN A BUILDING OR ON A ROOF SHALL ..... _ . ' :.. .� ... .. � . ,f. ...._ . .. ...,.. ....__. . ... ` . .. . .. _...._._� ._. . _.. . " ----�� - � - � - - � - . � ._ � '_ - ° -�• ' � - ` " _ � -�- � -�-- - � BE EMT OR W STABILIZED PNNTED SCHEDULE 80 PVC. „ , e>, . ,_. , , i�. . . „ x a°�. ; ...: � � I ; � � � F ' ; �`-��- � l . � . _�_� � . � I ...:. : _ ; . _ ..,. .... II , �; ; p' ;, c � } ' 3 �� _ ; �; �` !' ,-'�---�� 11, IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS OR WHERE SUSCEPTIBLE TO DAMAGE CONTRACTOR SHALL � , '!'�� _ � -- II : I I �� `�.. .� �-- � �=-- " F �; <;� � ' L--� � � � f__ �;` ' PROVIDE FORMED GRIP STRUT COVER OVER COAXIAL CABLE ROUTES. WHERE CABLE IS �' < II � � � � � ,. I _. �S/ r .._ _.� ; _. � 1 t . RUN ON THE WALL, ATfACH UNISTRUT TO WALL ANO COVER WITH 14 GA. GA�VANIZED � FORMED SHEEf MEfAL COVER OR MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY ERICSSON INC. m ; ` a�.��, �'u I I ��, �^k�� g CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. � k. •'.. � � q I W `�� I I � Z N NOTES 12. VERIFY ROUTE AND IENGTH OF CABLE PRIOR TO CUTTING. ADJUST INDICATED ROUTE � I I � �1 !�S REQUIRED TO CLEAR (E) EQUIPMENT AT FACILiTIES. ti, `, 7 �� . FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SHOWN TO CLARIFY ACCESS ROUTE 13. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 7/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 140�-0". MAXIMUM LENGTH OF o � O'� 1-1/4" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 190'-0'. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-5/S" COAX CA6LE -- AND UTILITY ROUTING FOR PROPOSED AT&T SITE. ALL °� - • 07 DEVELOPMENTS IN THIS DRAWING OTHER THAN REFFERING TO SHA�L BE 235 '-0". � �� _ 5 AT&T IS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT 14. VERIFY MODEL NUMBERS OF ANTENNAS WITH ERICSSON INC. SERVICES. ��• 2. FINISH ELEVATION GRADES BASED OFF OF FUTURE SITE � 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ?ESTING OF ANTENNAS AND SNALL PROVIDE OOCUMENTATION TO THE ERICSSON INC. PROJECT MANAGER. � � 3 4 DEVELOPMENTS BY DEVELOPER. -- -- - I 16. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY A�L TORQUE TOLERANCES PER THE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFlCATIONS AND RECOMMENOATlONS. I SITE PLAN Sc 6� 0 3o so 3 GENERAL ANTENNA & CABLE NOTES � p_ , � r � �J RA Jsffre�r Roms � Assoc(ata, Inc. Archtt�ctur� 3 Tel�communtcatfona 3 San Joaqufn Plaza, Sufta 1 SS N�wporl Bwch, Califomia 92660 Phone: (949) 760-3929 Fax: (949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INfORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SEf OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCIOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO ATBcT MOBILIN IS STRICTLY PROHI8ITED. STAMP �`�� A ��rF J '� �Rq��t � * C-020876 * f �: ,ly, F EB. 1 �P � Q�' CA1>F� PREPARED FOR , at&t 4420 Rosewood Drive Pteasanton, Califamia 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACQ. & ZONING DATE tRICS50N CM DATE ATdcT CM DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME NOVEMBER DRIVE PROJECT NUMBER CN3242-A RESULTS WAY CUPER11N0, CALIFORNIA 95014 SANTA CLARA COUNTI' DRAWING DATES 02/10/09 PRELIMINARY ZD REYIEW (P1) O6/08/09 OESIGN CHANGE (P2) `''�u7/02��09 FlNAL ZD�S (P3) O1/26/10 SfTE RELOCATION (P4) OS/10/10 t00X ZD'S (P5) 05/21/10 CLIEM COMMENTS (P6) O6/10/10 CUENT COMMENTS (P7) OS/1fi/10 PLANNING COMMENTS (P8) OB/23/10 CLIENT COMMENTS (P9) 08/31/10 REVISED ANTENNA COUNT (P10) RFDS REVISION LEVEI t.6 SHEEf TffLE SITE PLAN �'I � � a � � � Z U W � O � a Q � l ENLARGED SITE PLAN KE O t PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON A PROPOSED MONOPINE. ANTENNAS TO HAVE NEEDLE COVERS OVER PROPOSED ANTENNAS; SEE DEfAII 3/A-1. 2 PROPOSED (3�AT&T OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED ON A CONCR PAD. 3 FUTURE (4) ATdcT EQUIPMENT CABINEfS. 4 PROPOSED ATdcT GPS MOUNTED TO EQUIPMENT CA81NEf. 5 PROPOSED AT&T HORIZONTAL COAXIAL CABLE RUN MOUNTED TO WALL. 6 PROPOSED MEfER/MAIN, EMERSON LOAD CENTER, ANO WEATHERPROOF GFCI MOUNTED ONTO CMU WALL WITH UNISTRUT. 6A PROPOSED TELCO FlBER MUX CABINET ANO ALARM CABINETS MOUNTED TO CMU WALL WITH UNISTRUT. 7 PROPOSED TECH LIGHT MOUNTED ON PROPOSED H—FRAME UTIUTY RACK. 8 PROPOSED WATERPROOF SWITCH FOR TECH LIGHT TO BE MOUNTED TO CMU WALL 9 PROPOSE� 6�-0� HIGH CMU REiAINING WALL, WITH CIADDING TO MATCH FUTURE BUIIDINGS IN COLOR ANO STYLE. 10 PROPOSED 4'-0' WIDE SINGLE MEfAL TUBE ACCESS GATE. 11 PROPOSED 5�-0' WIDE AT&T UNDERGROUND POWER dc TElCO CONDUIT ROUTE. DISTANCE 318'-0't. TELCO CONDUIT SIZE TO BE 4" DIA. SCH. 40 PVC. POWER CONDUIT SIZE TO BE SPECIFIED BY SERVING UTILITY COMPANY; SEE DETAII 2/A-1 FOR TYP. TRENCH OETAII. 12 D(ISTING CONCREfE CURB� 13 D(ISTING ASPHAIT PAVED PARKING. 14 EXISTING TOE OF SLOPE. 15 EXISTING TOP OF SLOPE. 16 EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO BE REMOVED. 17 D(ISTING TREES AND BUSHES, PROTECT IN PLACE. „ n 18 D(ISTING BLOCK WALL. SECTOR ° 26 20 PROPOSED AT&T ACCESS STAIR ANO WALKWAY. 21 PROPOSED 4'-0" HIGH REfAINING WALL. � NOTES: ' 1. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SHOWN TO CLARIFY ACCESS ROUTE AND UTILITY ROUTING FOR PROPOSED AT&T SITE. ALL � DEVELOPMENTS IN THIS DRAWING OTHER THAN REFFERING TO � AT&T IS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. 2. FlNISH ELEVATION GRADES BASED OFF OF FUTURE SffE DEVELOPMENTS BY DEVELOPER. ENLARGED SITE PLAN , ,, . � ' i, 17 � �� ' � ' � � � i 22 0' � ATdcT LEASE AREA 21 � . . '332.0.4t � �� ''%; '�; ��; ;�- F.G, 332.2 f ; � F.�S. ;� v � 1 S 20 � � /�� , / G� 2 � -9 � — — � � � � '� ''� ';�� ;�;; ,�;, ;-;; 332.67t , is ;'; 4 ,�. ; ;" F.S. '�� ;�, �� 332.83t ;; F.S. %;, , s '" %;;; I ---� ;�,'% --- � � �, '' , I I � �'�; I / I � �_ ,_, � �' / / � I � �' .'. — � , �-- � � I _J �///% �---� ,';, ' � .� ', I � '%: ' I %',;% � '� �'- � � �� I ; • � i, , / / 'i � _ �; �/; . I .. i ' / ;. ,, ;ii - ; .; � i , , �' . � ;�; 8 � %' ; � �, i I ' /, -`_ -- � , T . I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I � � 327.10t T.C. I I �� ----'� I I I I I - . I � I I :I il 'I � i i I I I I I I � I I � I I -� � / / / / / / / /� � � � � � NOTE: ANTENNAS AND SUPPORT ARMS TO 8E PAINTED GREEN TO MATCH MONOPINE NEEDLES. MONOPOLE FOUNDATION. TMA — TYPICAL (2) PEF SECTOR. ATdcT PANEL ANTENNAS TYPICAL (4) PER SECTO TWO STACKED RAD CEN' 6 ANTENNAS O RAD CEI 6 ANTENNAS A RAD CENTER 58" AGL SE�TOR "g„ 26�� ANTEN NA P LAN VI EW �\ , ��' N Q � 5�,�: � 3 1/4"=1'-0" 0 2' 4' FlNISH GRADE PATCH (E) SURFACE TO MATCH (E) AOJACENT SURFACE REMOVED FOR TRENCH WARNING TAPE SAN� BACKFlLL (90R SCREENED) TAMP TO 95R COMPACTION IN 8' LIFTS, DCCEPT FOR ALL PAVED AREAS USE 2—SACK SLURRY ENCASEMENT. 4'0 SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT FOR TELCO \ � v ' �\� � �2 SOL1D BARE GROUND ic i�//�//�//�//�/j ��\� �\� .\� r\� POWER FEEDER OR UTILITY SERVICE. SIZE PER SERVING UTILITY COMPANY REOUiREMENTS. NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE MINIMUM ct.�nH. 2. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE REMOVAL OF SPOtLS. UTILITY TRENCH DETAIL 13 SCALE: NONE � , , „ SCALE: � 1 3/8"=1'-0" 0 1' 2' 3' � �O � <c/ � �� J RA Jeffrsp Rome � A�sociates, Inc. Arehitecturs d� TelscommunicaHons 3 San Joaqu(n Plaza, Sult� 155 Nswpo�i Bsoeh, Callfomfa 92660 Phon�: (949) 760-3929 Fax: ( 949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SEf OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIEfARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO ATBcT MOBILITY IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. STAMP ��,0 ARG.�� J� V Rq� �r �� * C-020876 �r �"t o : ,�, FfB. 2�� ' qT f Q� CAI�F� PREPARED FOR ,,..--- ,. � at&t 4420 Rosewood Drive Pleosanton, Califomia 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACQ. dc ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE ATdcT CM DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME NOVEMBER DRIVE I'I PROJECT NUMBER � CN3242—A � RESULTS WAY CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014 SANTA CIARA COUNTY DRAWING DATES 02/10/09 PRELIMINARY ZD REVIEW (P1) O6/08/09 DESIGN CHANGE (P2) 07/02/09 FINAL ZD'S (P3) "� /26/-� 0 SITE RELOCATION (P4) OS/10/10 100R ZD'S (PS) OS/21/10 CLIENT COMMENTS (P6) O6/10/10 CUENT COMMENTS (P7) 08/16/10 PLANNING COMMENTS (P8) 08/23/10 CLIENT COMMENTS (P9) OS/31/10 REVISED ANTENNA COUNT (P10) RFDS REVI510N LEVEL 1. SHEET TITLE ENLARGED SITE PLAN �_�� M n O � O W m � 7 Z r U W � � a � � �� ENLARGED SiTE PLAN KE YNOTES 1 IXISTING 6' 0 REDWOOD "SEQUOIA SEMPERVIRENS' TO BE REMOVED. 1A IXISTING BUSHES TO 8E REMOVED. 2 IXISTING TREES AND BUSHES, PROTECT IN PL4CE. 3 IXISTING CONCREfE CURB. 4 DCISTING ASPHALT PAVED PARKING. 5 D(ISTING TOE OF SLOPE. 6 D(ISTING TOP OF SIOPE. 7 D(ISTING BLOCK WALL 8 IXISTING PROPERIY LINE. � TREE REMOVAL PLAN � �i i F ' � i i } "� �,. , , i � - ;�, . . .. \' , =- � �� . : _ �. /. /. - - i � �� _- , � i , f , � i. i,.. 'i � i .� r, � / I 14'-8'' ATReT I FASF ARFA /, � � / �: �� _`� 1 — � — — — — , � � , I ' ' I ' ' ,� _ I � i � 1: . � , . , �. , _. _ , I � ' I O , I ; , I I I I . .�- . ; I I � / I � � . I ; � � � �' , I • O I �, I . I ' I ,. , , % I ' I , . � , O " I I � I -/ . I I _ . �' 1A �: / I `; I — — — — — — — — — — — ,/ I ' , , /' ',.I. i . . t p , � = ;'�- � '' -. 7 � ��, / �i,: " ' d: � % � �� .� . � �/ . ` `� .. : ,, ', �, . ; � i �; � _ � , � _- - �' � � '� _ - i � � /i %, � ' 't ; i, � - �� , : �� / /� I+ � _. .. � ' . -�.. .� ' '' / . , i - _ "•,li"�_ _ . ,% i , _ % r � ` i� �, iir �- , TYP. 4� N S��E: � 1 1/4"=1'-0" 0 2' 4' �J RA Jeffrey Rome dc Anociatea, Inc. Arehitecfure � TslscommunlcaHons 3 5an Joaquln Plaza, Suit� 155 Nawporf Bsoch, Cali(omla 92660 Phons: 949 760-3929 Fax: 949 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SEf Of CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIEfARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO ATBcT M081LIN IS STRICTLY PROH181TED. STAMP G � t y�,� ARC�ijT J '1 Rq� �i � * C-020876 �k -f�'° O� s F fB. 2�� Q qT f Q�' CA�� PREPARED FOR � at&t 4420 Rosewood Orive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER OATE SITE ACQ. dc ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE ATdcT CM DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME NOVEMBER DRIVE PROJECT NUMBER CN3242—A RESUITS WAY CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014 SANTA CIARA COUNTY DRAWING DATES 02/10/09 PREIJMINARY ZD REYIEW (P1 O6/08/09 DESIGN CHANGE (P2) 07/02/09 FINAL ZD'S (P3) `�1/26`10 SITE RELOCATION (P4) 05/10/10 100� ZD�S (P5) 05/21/10 CLIENT COMMENTS (P6) O6/10/10 CLIENT COMMENTS (P7) OS/16/10 PIANNING COMMENTS (P8) OB/23/10 CLIENT COMMENTS (P9) OS/31/10 REVISED ANTENNA COUNT (F RF05 REVISION LE,/EL 1.6 SHEEf TITLE TREE REMOVAL PLAN A-1.1 M 0 rn 0 W m � � Z U W � 0 � a � ELEVATION KEYNOTES O MOUN�ED ON A PR MONOPINE RANTENNA TO HAVE R5) 5 EXISTING BUILDING. PINE NEEDLES COVERS OVER EACH ANTENNA. 1A PROPOSED AT&T (6) 2 ANTENNAS PER SECTOR, 3 SECTORS) 6 EXISTING LANDSCAPING. PROTECT IN PLACE. MOUNTED ON A PR6P�SED MONOPINE. ANTENNA TO HAVE PINE NEEDLES COVERS OVER EACH ANTENNA. 7 FUTURE OTHER CARRIER 9) ANTENNAS 2 PROP05ED ATdcT MONOPINE WITH FULL BARK CIADDING. (3 PER SECTOR, 3 SECT RS). BOTTOM OF PINE BRANCHES TO START AT 25'-0' A.G.L 8 EXISTING BLOCK WALL 3 PROPOSED 6�-0� HIGH CMU EQUIPMENT ENCIOSURE, WITH CLADDING TO MATCH FUTURE BUILDINGS IN COLOR AND ST`(lE. 9 EXISTING CONCRETE CURB. O4 PROPOSED ATdcT GP5 MOUNTED TO EQUIPMENT CA8INET. 10 FUTURE CONCRETE CURB. TOP OF (N) ATdcT MONOPINE. �a.00 ac.�.. 0 � n OP OF (N) ATdcT ANTENNAS. 67.08 AG.L CENTER OF (N) ATdeT ANTENNAS 65.00 A.G.L TOP OF ( N) ATdcT A �8 A.G.L CENTER OF (N AT&T A NTEN NAS. 58.00 A.G.L � � i o n � � �n tD O m N BOTTOM OF (N) MONOPINE NEEDLES. 25.00 A.G.L O I in N r � �� ! � I I �--� � �it,x,� � I �. - } : �� _ . � � _. x �� - �� . • y. �, '^'`�'` i y R � `� : �� ..�`'�='� �i.�::�! � i..j ,'+� �.., `� � �� _ � '=��i '�` ; µqtc � � � r,� a� �� > � �� i?'c �.'..: 'a'�'. �.'�"��!�-� ;' �` ,� ,�:'; �-.� � '� ,i � -� . :�,; i'� �'y� �` - � � ;��.�'� � � � -a` w Y � �� :�*-. � , r��' .� �". "4 . _, k:• r +�..if� G�( � �, � ,ttf�' , i...v �: 7 y, � �� F•�� -�' . . `��"�t � �`. C d .'$� ..:.��". �..-.:.t._.� " �`ir � �v,�•�. `. � � � �a r %�' i � � ��„� � _ _��r �• ' i 9�_� � r.� � ;; 4 y� � 3 6 S �;% .� _:� . y , � � _. � .. ',%% .. � § : y. '1—;.. �i�� i « �� ' ii � ;' a y � �, - � �;; 7F x ` � �`�,�1 L . _ - �; � ; �� o- ,� / z.- � ; � '' %%; , �r r�3� %'i ,� `. . ' i i ', � it� 1 ? ', i ~'�'` .ii�! i ��^ '�.i'. ' / P i�/ � � - � � � .< , � � ; ' '� , `' 7 � ;. - �� r'�► r � T , �� :�: � � �'; _ '. � �' / 1 � /� �%%%i TOP OF (N) CMU ENCLOSURE. i 1� �r _ • ,%�� % 6.00 A.G.L. >''�� ,,:';% . i i =�.' i� ,�i ; 0 332.67t F.S. - i I i i r" � i i '_. '� ''�:', � � f ',:�, � i � :%� TOP OF F.S. 332.00t T.C. ' � ' - ;;�;' %% .ii i � ,�, �.,. %;; . , 00.00 A.G.L. (FUTURE) ,' ,. -- --- — — — — � � — — — +�� r ;'�, ;, ;; FUTURE GRADE — — — , -- -------- 0 I �� '� 327.10t T.C. ToP oF QusriNC cuRa. ELEVATION GRADES BASED —05.83 A.G.L. IX�STING GRADE QF'F FUT�JRE S�jE :. IMPROVEMENTS BY D�/ELOPER. 4 ___ .. _ _._ _ __. .__.._: SCALE: -, NORTH ELEVATION �, 2 3/16"=1 �-0" 0 3 6 ELEVATION KEYNOTES O M UNTED A PR MONOPINE RANTENNA� TO HAVE RS) 5 EXISTING BUILDING. PINE NEEDLES COVERS OVER EACH ANTENNA. ( ) 6 EXISTING LANDSCAPING. PROTECT IN PLACE. � MOUNTED A PR D MONOPINE RANTENNA� 0 HAVE RS) PINE NEEDLES COVERS OVER EACH ANTENNA. 7 FUTURE OTHER CARRIER (9) ANTENNAS 2 PROPOSED ATdcT MONOPINE WITH FULL BARK CLADDING. (3 PER SECTOR, 3 SECTO BOTTOM OF PINE BRANCHES TO START AT 25'-0" A.G.L 8 EXISTING BLOCK WALL 3 PROPOSED 6�-0' HIGH CMU EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE, WITH CLADOING TO MATCH FUTURE BUILDINGS IN COLOR AND ST`fLE. 9 EXISTING CONCREfE CURB. O4 PROPOSED AT&T GPS MOUNTED TO EQUIPMENT CABINEf. 10 FUTURE CONCREfE CURB. .� � �� !' �� i � � r; � �r , � t � �! � ��,:�� yd'�. �,�. au�: �, � � ' A � F �lA � �� \�� 'ti ;� \\\ ` ��. ��.: \ �w:�r-�„�, _ ;.::, -. is � ' - �` • . ,�a��:� ''!_ °�- � ': {� , . '+�n,..;��_.'.+�.� '�' �' k�� •� �. � �i �` � �ii "� �.� , -1�`�� _ , ~�;��. � �� ' S l..' ��,�[1.na�...,(�►� �'� �� — — � � �� : ! �'�; : �'�- = �'� F, . .• �� _ � . �, �.;� �. _._ �;�54�:.31 '� ;.�,�} �a �' �{� 1 � � � a f �"'. .� ��. �,�- �'��% I I� �� '' I I�-� -� ;� ��..�� I L ^ , � � ,.�..,�� ,�;. �' �.�c � ,;�-� ��F. ;.� � wy ,�� 7 � �1 �. .'�_� ��.r f�. '�' � •;s, ,�" �� a .. s� �[, ir,� � �� \�� ,� �� i� � �� ;:�� ir . �1 1• !" � y6 \ . Y' !.; � � � .�' �� ,�`�-`�. �'� _ . ��tv.�. ::i2 ..�..r � �. �^�.��•' T , � � _ , w � .�� 1� , "lE ' " �r t� '';� ±.� 7 j � " �� +,x N � t { � * 3'ft �9 �' aY '8,= `�L��aln��_ L� �t�'. � 'y�..i33� _ '`s �`'aK �` . �^ �. y �:_�::�-� . 2 : _. _ ��, �ri+� } �� r � ak � � �� ,�� ..',�' - �,#� '. ,. � �S i' i � A� �� ; . � �.;� . / � L: �' � ��- �. . � • �' � � , � ��. �� y � ��c'�'�� .� '� �' �^+� �,�. � ��. �k �'_ V�:.,� �. -'� i 9'-0" �` }� s�k ��.-�. , . �� 1 T 3 '� " � .. ,�( �ry i f � �; � � � � �� J �'"�`� ' , - . \,, •7 Y � r � ; +�,",�� ; �;. + ,., ,.aJ .Y • . � .. , ; �Y . . ... „ �'j� �� i) .. . r , ; f , ._ h! , . � . ;� � G %;' ( .v.. .... . . _ . . � �.A$� .!',',`�� .� .. TOP OF (N) ATdcT MONOPINI 74.00 A.G.I TOP Of (N) ATdcT ANTENNAS. s�.oa ac.�. _ CENTER OF (N) ATdcT ANTENNAS. 65.00 A.G.L. TOP OF (N) AT&T ANTEN�NAS. �� 60.08 A.G.L �` _ _ CENTER OF (N) ATdcT ANTENNAS. 58.00 A.G.L t ■ � o ^ I � N t0 0 I m N BOTTOM OF (N) MONOPINE NEEDLES. 25.00 A.G.L TOP OF (N) CMU ENCLOSURE. 6.00 A.G.L. 0 I �fl N .J RA Jeffroy Rome d� Assoclates, Inc. Architecfuro k Tel�communicationa 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 N�wport B�ach, CallTornfa 92660 Phone: (949) 760-3929 Faz: (949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION OOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO ATBcT MOBILIIY IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. STAMP c �NSED AR� yTF .; V • Rq� �> �F � C-020876 * t, o : ,�. F fB.2$'��3 � A�' CA�� PREPARED FOR �,.,-^.-_ at&t 4420 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACQ. dc ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE O � � n _ ATdcT CM DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE � 332.67t F.S. o � I i � i 332.00t T.C. TOP OF F.S. •------- ------- (FUTURE) — — — — — — — — FUTURE GRADE 00.00 A.G.L. ----------------- 10 � 327.10t T.C. �n ELEVATION GRADES BASED OFF FUTURE SITE TOP OF EXISTING CURB. I TN RA —05.83 A.G.L IMPROVEMENTS BY DEVELOPER. ! SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: � 1 3/16"=1'-0" 0 3' 6' PROJECT NAME NOVEMBER DRIVE PROJECT NUMBER CN3242—A RESULTS WAY CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014 srwrn cu�w► cou►vrr DRAWING DATES 02/10/09 PREUMINARY ZD REVIEW (P1) O6/08/09 DESIGN CHANGE (P2) 07/02/09 FlNAL ZD�S (P3) Ot/"26/10 SITE RELOCATION (P4) 05/10/10 100X ZD'S (P5) 05/21/10 CUENT COMMENTS (P6) O6/10/10 CUENT COMMENTS (P7) 08/16/10 PLANNING COMMENTS (P8) 08/23/10 CLIENT COMMENTS (P9) 08/31/10 REVISED ANTENNA COUNT (P10) RFDS RE LE 1.6 SHEE7 T1TLE NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATIONS A-2 � M n 0 0 � m � � z � U w � O � a a � , ELEVATION KEYNOTES O M UN�ED�ON A PR MONOPINE. 0 HAVE RS) 6 IXISTING LANOSCAPING. PROTECT IN PLACE. PINE NEEDLES COVERS OVER EACH ANTENNA. ( ) ( 7 FUTURE OTHER CARRIER (9) ANTENNAS • 1A MOUN�ED A PR MON PINE. 0 HAVE Rs� (3 PER SECTOR, 3 SECTORS). PINE NEEDLES COVERS OVER EACH ANTENNA. 8 EXISTING BLOCK WALL. 2 PROPOSED AT&T MONOPINE WITH FULL BARK CLADDING, WITH • BOTTOM OF PINE BRANCHES TO START AT 25'-0" A.G.I. 9 D(ISTING CONCRETE CURB. 3 PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH CMU EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE. CIADDING TO MATCH FUTURE BUILDINGS IN COLOR AND SME. 10 FUTURE CONCRETE CURB. 4 PROPOSED AT&T GPS MOUNTED TO EQUIPMENT CABINEf. 11 PROPOSED ACCESS STAIR AND REfAINING WALL 5 EXISTING BUILDING. �. EAST ELEVATION TOP OF (N) ATdcT MONOPINE. `' \� �r � 74.00 A.G.L �., r ,; ��.�, : 7R � ��9�1�N�� ..,:� n � �,.� a `f r �' ��- �, ' �'�" y�+.�,�t �, ��'" �, z.,,� atl. �,��' ,r; .� � �"�,�. ��'�� +-��I� Y TOP OF (N) ATdcT ANTENNAS. , �r' �:� 67.08 A.G.L � : �` ' ` "` � i+ _ _ _ _ CENTER OF (N) AT&T ANTENNAS. � � � . �� 65.00 A.G.L. =�„ '��',"� ,.� � F �. ,� 4 '� _ � . __ '��'�.r_f'vs�, �' TOP OF (N) AT&T ANTENNAS. —� `� � _ '�` - 60 08 !�C\ITCO /1C /�1� •TO�T IMPROVEMENTS BY DEVELOPER. SCALE: �1 3/16"=1'-0" 0 3' 6' �J RA Jeff►ey Rome �C Asaociate�, Inc. Architscturo dc Tslacommunicationa 3 5an Joaqui� Plaza, Suit� 155 N�wport Beach, Colifomta 92660 Phanr (949) 76U-3929 Fax: (949) 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY 8Y NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO ATBcT M081LIT' IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. STAMP \` ��.o a�� .��V •Rp��'r > +t C-020876 * -f O �. ,rj. ' 7-a'� ��aQ' � � CA�� PREPARED FOR � � dt&t 4420 Rosewood �rive Pleasonton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SITE ACQ. & ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE AT&T CM DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME NOVEMBER DRIVE PROJECT NUMBER CN3242—A RESULTS WAY CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014 I SANTA CIARA COUNTY ' DRAWING DATES 02/10/09 PRELIMINARY ZD REVIEW (P1) O6/08/09 DESIGN CHANGE (P2) Q7/02/09 FINA� ZD'S (P3) 01/26/10 SITE RELOCATION (P4) OS/10/10 1007. ZD'S (PS) OS/21/10 CLIENT COMMENTS (P6) O6/10/10 CLIENT COMMENTS (P7) 08/16/10 PLANNING COMMENTS (P8) 08/23/10 CLIENT COMMENTS (P9) 08/31/10 REVISED ANTENNA COUNT (P10) RFDS REVISION L E V EL 1. SHEET TITLE EAST ELEVATION A- 3 M n O Of O � w m � � Z � U w � O a � -� s Title Report #1 PREPAREO BY: FlRST AMERICAN Ti11.E COMPANY ORDER NO.: 0714-3327625 OATED: JUNE 23, 2009 Legal Description REAL PROPERtt.IN iHE CITY Of CUPER71N0, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STAiE OF CALIfORN1A, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: ALl 1}1AT POR110N OF SA10 LAND AS�RIBED AS ADJUSTEO PARCEL 3 AS SHOWN IN THAT CERTAIN LOT LINE ADJUSiMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 AS DOCUMENT N0. 15862177 AND AS FURTHER DESCRIBED BELOW: BEINC ALL OF PARCEL 3, AS SHOWN UPON THAT CERTA�N PARCEL MAP WHICH MAP WAS FlLED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFlCE OF THE RECORDER OF 1HE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, 5?A7E OF CAUFORNIA ON APRIL 12, 1979 IN BOOK 439 OF MAPS AT PACES 12 AND 13 AND BEINC A PORTION OF iHE LANDS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT RECOROED OCTOBER 14, 1975 IN BODK 8662 AT PAGE 46 IN THE OFFlCE OF THE RECORDER OF SANTA CLARA COUNIY ANO BEING IAORE PARTICULARLY DESCR18ED AS FOLLOWS: BECINNINC AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL: T}iENCE ALONG THE WESIERLY UNE OF SAID PARCEL NORiH 00' 01' 00" WEST 241.44 fEET TO 1HE SOU7HWESTERLY CORNER OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 8662 AT PACE 48; THENCE ALONG THE WES1ERlY LINE Of SAID UNDS NORTH 00' 00' 33' WEST 318.23 FEET; 1HENCE SOUTH 69' S6' 46' EAST 274.02 fEET TO 1HE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID IANOS; THENCE ALONG SAIO L1NE SWiH 19' O6' 48� EAST 535.47 FEET TO iHE NORTHEASTER�Y CORNER OF SA10 PARCEL: THENCE AIONG 7HE EASTERLY LINE OF SA10 PARCEL SIX1TH 19' D6' 48' EAST 293.23 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER Of SAID PARCEL; THENCE ALONG hIE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL NOR1H B2' 24' 51' WEST 261.05 FEET; 7HENCE CONTINUINC ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 89' S7' 24' WEST 220.99 FEET TO 1HE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 8: PARCEL 2, AS SHOWN UPON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP WHICH MAP WAS FlLED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFlCE OF 7HE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CIARA, STATE OF CAUFORNIA ON APRII 12, 1979 IN 800K 439 OF MAPS AT PACES 12 AND 13. Easements # 1 O 4 EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC SERVICE AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 407, PACES 28 � 29 OF MAPS (PIOTTED HEREON) O 5 EASEMENT FOR PUBUC SERVICE AND SANITARY SEWER AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 439, PAGES 12 Ac 13 OF MAPS. (PLOTTED HEREON) 16 EASEMENT FDR INGRESS, ECRESS. ACCE55 AND PARKING FOR VEHICUTAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC RECORDEO AS DOC. N0. 16105737, O.R. (BLANKET IN NATURE) 17 PE�ESTRIAN PA7H EASEMENT RECORDED AS DOC. N0. 16334779, O.R. (PLOTTED HEREON) Title Report #2 PREPARED BY: FlRST AMERICAN T1TLE COMPANY ORDER NO.: 0714-3430588 DATED: DECEMBER 14, 2009 Legal Description REAI. PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF CUPERi1N0, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORrNA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: I PARCEL A, AS SHOWN UPON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP WHICH MAP WAS FlLED FOR RECORD � IN THE OFFlCE OF 1HE RECOROER OF hIE COUNTY Of SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON JANUARY 23, 1980 IN BOOK 479 OF MAPS AT PACE 1. Easements THERE ARE NO EASEUENTS LISTED IN THE EXCEPTIONS OF SAID TITIE REPORT p2. Assessor's Parcel Nos. 357-20-041, 357-20-046 � 357-18-035 Geographic Coordinates at Proposed Monopine 1983 DAiUM: tATITUDE 37' 19' 10.18� N LONpTUDE 122' 03� 09.82' W 1927 DATUAI: LA7ITUDE 37' 19' 10.59� N IONGI7UDE 122' 03' 05.96' W ELEVAiION = 334.5 FEET ABOVE MEAN SEA LEVEI (A.M.S.L.) CERTIFlCAiION: 1HE LATITUDE AND LONGITUOE SHOWN A80VE ARE ACCURATE TO WITHIN +/- 15 FEET HORIZONTALLY AND 7HAT 1HE ELEVAl10NS SHOWN ABOVE ARE ACCURATE TO WITHIN +/- 3 FEET VERTICALLY. THE HORIZONTAL DAIUM (GEOCRAPHIC COORDINA7E5) IS IN lERMS OF THE NOR7Fi AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 (NAD 83) AND IS EXPRESSED IN DEGREES ('), MINUIES (') AND SECONDS ('), TO THE NEAREST HUNDREDTH OF A SECOND. THE VERIICAL DATUM (ELEVAl10NS)IS IN lERMS OF THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 19B8 (NAVD 88) AND IS DETERM�Nm TO 1HE NEAREST TENTH OF A FOOT. Basis of Bearings 1}IE STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 (NAD 83), CALJFORNIA ZONE 3. Bench Mark 7HE CALJFORNIA SPAl1AL REFERENCE C.O.R.S "P273", ELEVATION = 656.17 FEET (NAVD 88). Date of Survey JANUARY 20, 2010 ,,, .. ;. ,,, ,;, ;- i;i" i�; �i ANTENNA �� .>,; ;,� „ r � „ �. ;,, ;;� ;;; ;,. iii %i�' /i� EXISTINC BUILDINC i�' ii �,ii ii; '%� iii �iii �i. :ii �5;, �asnHC eui�oiHC ;;; %% "� %5:; ;;; ;�;s;; ii; � �� ii. ii: �ii, iii %i�; I /i� 'i/i //% !//% :'/,; �;,' �, ,-,,,,,,��,� � „�,� � �,,,,•� .� i:� - - �� -� _ 4 T P 34� 336.11F$ � N ----_ ----- WEST 15�.0�_ -----_ � -----------� ------------- � �� II N �k' � 338.99F5 33 � - - �� r�� CP�� CP. � 3J6.79F5 336.40F �� , � �, �• I 343.23F5 % - f r. �iiiiiii�ii��r ►r*► iiTiii� n !'Tiiiii� 7 'T� ::�/ii� iiiii,3 iiii...,, iiiii,., !�iii.. ,iiiiiiiii.!iiii�d� ;�� AT PROROSED MONOPINE ';; GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE: i� LAT.= ; 37'19'10.18°N NAD ��. LONG.= 122'03'09.82"W � i i; ;�� EJQSTINC BURDINC "%; ;� � (LOWER ROOF) ' (UPPER ROOF) i� %- -;; �� :: 334.49TC Lease Area Detail SCALE: 1'=20' _ _ • 533.63F5 �. � --.._ .. z �- Y = � � ... _. . a...__ _. e � �� 351.26TOP � � , � PROPOSED ATkT � � � s' vnoE unuTr Rou� .22N _ _ .. _..._��i1.37f5 25 � ,� 331.89TC � � ��,�3TOP � �� ' II � J34.35NC 1 -. _. � 332.33TDE �--� �oszFs }}216TC � � a 330.B6TC t o � • � � : � "! I 35B.3BTDP � m 33S45N1;� I POINT A' --- 1 WEST � 33p,62TC o , v�i � _. .�. � PROPOSED N .�4TC � � � 42.S�z2Y � __1_ _. �_._ � � S5&SOTOP LEASE AREA I � � � I WEST , i � L4 � � I i .��+ 22.00' POINT 'B' i I � 555.09TOP 3}1.99T __ __... --- � � � � � � 330.27TC � _ _ I � 1 �� PROPOSED ATEcT 12' WIDE � I NON-El(CLUSIVE ACCE55 ROUlE i� � '� aS _ _. __ .. . _ • 3�D.1 � � i � � 330.93NC � � � I � � 357.36TOP �� I � 330.22TC � '': � � � � , . k� m 330.93NG I Z `� 3Yc ....�..--.... ---• J3�.13i i � _..-- - . _. _ . m_. _ I I � � � - H I � - � _ 3J0_27TC_ 335.78NC'' _ _ � - 364.03TDP � I I 3 a I � o� � ---.._...._._...----� � 330.9 C � � �• � 6 I 6 � m: __ _�- I � � 330.91 C . � � E - --... _ _.... _. . _._..... 331i.16FS i E � � � � _ _.. _ . .__ � ' I � 330.91 TC I � z 330.�9TC I 5 I I a 358.48TOP � I 330.B1TC � I � I � p ,,� � � �� I �------------ � � 3�5.83NC i - - - �� I L-------------- 331.65TC i iii 'iii i%i' 'i: i iii, �ii ��' ' 357.49TOP iii iii.,. %i%% /% //////� /////I � //////// .��///�� ////�//// �/ � - - - - - - - � - - - - - - - 7 64TOP � � ' OLIVE AVENUE _ _ � _ � � � Access Route h1AT POR710N Of LAND fN hiE CITY OF CUPER71N0, CWNTY Of SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED AS AO,NSTED PARCEI 3 AS SHOWN IN THAT CERTAIN LOT uNE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 AS DOCUMENT N0. 15882177 TOCETHER WIiH THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 2, AS SHOWN UPON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP WHICH MAP WAS FlLED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFlCE OF THE RECOROER OF SA10 COUNTY ON APRIL 12, ' 1979 IN BOOK 439 Of MAPS AT PAGES 12 AND 13, BEING A STRIP OF LAND, 12.00 fEET WIDE, LYINC 6.00 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FOLLOWINC DESCR�BED CENTERUNE: ' COMMENCING AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2, SAID POINT BEINC ON A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEA57ERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 387.00 FEET, A RAD�AL IINE 1HROUCH SAID POINT BEARS N67Z3'21"W. SAIO CURVE ALSO BEINC iHE NORiHWE51ERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF BUBB ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE NORTNEASTERLY ALONG SAI� CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANCLE OF 12'45'50', AN ARC DISTANCE OF 86.21 FEET TO iHE POINT OF BECINNING; THENCE N55'35'21'W, 363.76 FEET; iHENCE NORTH, 67.74 I FEET, THENCE EAST, 207.BB FEE7, THENCE N18'19'01'W, 727.27 FEET, iHENCE WESi, 311.34, 1HENCE NORTH, 166.54 FEET; THENCE WEST, 30.00 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT 'A' ANO THE END OF SAID STRIP. Z 336.57f5 I J � 334.11F5� Lease Area $ � BECINNING AT POINT 'A' AS DESCRIBED ABOVE: THENCE SOUTH, 17.25 FEET TO A POINT I I HEREINAFfER REFERRED TO AS POINT "B'; 1HENCE CONTINUING SOUTH. 4.00 FEET; iHENCE I WEST, 2200 FEET; 1HENCE NORTH, 4250 FEET; iHENCE EAST, 22.00 FEET; 1HENCE - 3 SOUTH, 21.25 FEET TO 1HE POINT OF BEGINNING. � CONTAINING 935 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. m I UN I AI �I RO V D, FEET NADE, LYING 250 FEET ON EACH SIOE OF THE I FOLLOWINC DESCRIBED CENIERLINE: BEGINNING AT POINT 'B� AS DESCRIBED ABOVE; THENCE EAST, 5.00 FEET; THENCE NOR7H, 84.00 FEET; iHENCE WEST, 750.00 FEET; THENCE 567'0754"W, 7225 fEET TO INE END OF SAID STRIP. ' � __ � � v� e 34240F5 ii�ii :i;!�� ii, W i' i� � �i: z a i; S „� ,,; m ,,. ;;; � ii, � / /i X �� W �ii �, i� ii, ii; ... �:: ��; � _ LOMITA AVENUE - � � _ _ � I I I I I I - - I I I I �� i S I � � � I : FD MON. WELL I I I PER P.M. 284/�� - . OLIVE ' AVENUE fD 2' BRASS DISK - NO REfERENCE _ �I _ _ � I Z I ,I I I - Q S�e� Lease Q Ar�aLDetail WI 5 F f - '- - - i � I - - I I FS FlN/SH SURFACE NC NAIURAC CROUND � PON£R POLE o RETA/N/NC/BLOCK WALL EC ELECIR/C CAB/NET � CONCRETE PAVEMENT PINE 1REE 1REE TC 70P OF CURB ---- PROPERTY UNE �-o- WROUCHT IRON FfNCE - � - CHA/N LINK FENCE ^� � CATE TR 717ANSFORMER TOP TOP OF S1RUC1URf B CEODf11C COORD/NA1E5 TOE 70E OF SLOPE � f7RE HYDRAN7/FlRE 8 EM ELEC 1A/C METER � fLECTR/C VAUL r . � �� 11 �� 1 l�7J'llf'� BLOCK WALL Boundary Detail SCALE: 1'=100' � �� 01 �^ � PROPOSED ATdcT 1 5' WIDE UTIUTY ROUTE �o y � � $ _ PRO�SE� ATdcT �� - O 42.5' 22' IEASE AREA = �� } _ WEST I ` Q � �� I � 3 a � s - _. � �I N ,� i � AR � P PR �� _ � I� I o��N� PO ��S��p1 1 v ''. I I O �� SEP 86Z ' =�� - - RE�' NO• � - Z ; 1 , i �� ( � ��-�� GRAPHIC SCALE ; ' L = _ = sL _ MP- �,±.�<_ _ _ _ � ioo o so ioo ' � ( ----_----�\\�1 �\ FEET � ` �� _ � - J `� `�- DOSTING BUIIDING \ � �\ - - 17 \� ` � � � \`, \ 343.3BF5 D�S11NC �''` � BUILDING 343.83F5 • � � I � � \� \� � EXIS7INC BUILDINC \�� \` � \� \� \ � � \ � .,�RGE�_2o4� `,�� , r � ��,..- „ � ,. Np.N• \� �� \� \� \ P ` � A RGE� M � 2-� 3 ��\`�; �`�. P � q .39/ \�\ \� P•� f� ?ROPOSED AT$T 12 NADE � \ NON-EXCLUSIVE ACCE55 ROUTE \ � \` � "�� r�� ----- � 7.88' �� \ r ----=-----� --�-- ��' � � _� ,/ �� N�, \ \� I �` ��\s\�, 4 5 \ �w I \ \ �� I �FS� �� I b�1'1T !T � � � P.o.e. \ WI.�' s �L \� � I \ �\��_ E� � �� s� � � P AR��,za'°+Z �� '�� 'zj� i I �P,N• � \NS � I � �w / I P.O.C. Q I / � I I � , �� m - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ � --- McCLELL.AN �Rpqp ------- J RA Jeffrey Rome & Associates, Inc. Architacture k Telecommunications 3 San Joaquin Plaza, Suite 155 Newport Bsach, Calffornia 92660 Phone: 949 760-3929 Fax: 949� 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SE? OF CONSTRUC?ION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY U5E OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AT&T MOBILITY IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. CONSULTANT �� SUt�VEYING, INC. 411 .lanb Clr., Sulb 205, Caivne, CA928B0 Phone: 93'I-280-9980 Fnc 951-280-g748 Tall Frse: B00-CHLVADA www.caN�da.cam J08 N0. 10042 PREPARED FOR at&t 4430 Rosewood Orive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. DATE SAC AND ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE AT&T CM DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME NOVEMBER DRIVE PROJECT NUMBER CN3242-A RESULTS WAY CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SANTA CL4RA COUNIY DATE DESCRIPTION BY O1/22/10 PRELIMINARY MN 04/14/10 TITLE REPORT / FINAL RA' 05/21/10 ACCE55 EASEMENT UPDATE GP'. SHEET TITLE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY C-1 SHEET 1 OF 1