HomeMy WebLinkAboutASAC Minutes - 02-24-1992 �y
'.k `.?.:.�� ',•! '.1►� 't�- .tt` *J .�:al:: 07 f�' •/F'.>c d, -. • ^'9:
7,01
.r" .a O, a
G1 •'.:-1 � _ram -'�_I
ALI
ni
�.t� ��).._.i'�2 _ «..�#t.�t% .�'_i.,:�__ s!1l: Lr.t#a-.[S:1!�. �}. •mot r - _
�:•lflf - :-.'tires-_]. _ ,�
4
A�
Page -2- PWMMrY 24, 1M
TtU XSVIeWed the sWf this item been
the with Am ncting Far the
of the .
O=dttee NWbW Lime4zessedW OMICOWns with the prcpaged 8JAP.
CaNdttee Hember lavic® eMWessed with OW-Mn with Un quality of the
color baa �be to AMC. 91
Minted.
Wwtion,6 what
Oa m ittee Member Jackson MWested minx' the bac�und of the tenant
names for ease in changing tim tar n* names.
*m,dttee tamer Basle 9uwtiaaed the orImtatian of the sign and
vls'Creek k - NO SUgg&Jted that the B1vd. to inca the vi ity p�c� fir. ar toStevem
Ommittee Nmbw Iavios suggested allowing the appliow* to c h apse which
m' A best suit the center's need and place a matching side
Panel on the otter side of the sign.
a�ttee Mom' is fe prefers no tenv and a smaller sign and sugsted
ding be added to the resolution far waiving the 200 ft l�. a. xuae arfter i .
OmMittee HwbW Jackson questioned why the O
mtmws East bound car West bma d or, Stems Creek Blvd.; or off Hig are �9 frcfrom.hway-85.
AD: On a! 3-1 vote, with Omm ttee Imo° die dissenting,
l �atian 4 A 2, was according to the fudis ags and
mined in the model resolution with Finding 2 mad,Om aditim 9 modified, and oanditians 10 and 11 added to read as follms:
Finding:
2. Due to the uniclue orientation and limited visibility of the building,
the 200 ft. rule m i.teria is waived for this application
Oonditicns:
9• The 4p0ral is basest upon Site Plan dated
, February elevation �thibit OWsf apt as 2y trih1p39(2��xt� ii��ns
emamarated . �.�+ a/A R6Lt�Vd L.7
10. The tenant name bad panel shall be raised in arder to allow
easy rolacamit.
11. The backside of the panel shall be painted broom to mate the
building.
.y
''`'L.. !', .z. t '�:r`+- ..i:..li. IJ.a�i.i.'.''.•r "i.•. - TO
•.1:- - .:y-
-♦i .f:-`.- .I, is _ - - ..
ei
all
41,
t _ -
•T . __ ►•fig.= - - -
u. .
: 1" 6•:♦.' � ..•1"• • ... S:• '•.:-:11 ram.-M_ .. • • - �_.�.. �,,._k �: • 1 .,, ,w _:
Il '��.r: "..}-'w C-1 "'. ♦.:�Bt': . ;,r ...:•P'w"0...T..• ♦ill-Ira-�.. � _ - ..
•} 'i'.-it-I1. - �Il�a�=1 ��
- � .- it-.. •:• _ -•.� _:• •I ... ti •` _:•
- Dili• f-: v3. r - N'•: .,i:. / .1.J
it
ee 7 •.•f111 =-
R.LP 1 y
sell
a`
•t `• •, {1 it - •
If.J
•- � - _- • 'C•;' � 1Y).=# r•1 1 .- . .ice. •~ ,..♦-7I= • CI -
01
04
_c•
1 tlr Pl
:•, y
` r• r
•j •7 •.rY. -tll •)� _). _ o•.. •, _ - III,
f
r :r '4� kd1g )•�'e'
Cr'
« Y 11•
-G:hlt •�. _T.. '••S'."^j' .b'4 " - - •.•A y` — •r-Y314. .-
�.�
:n}r-330• •3� - .i' •.,1•' fir, �l '.-3 �l :�'
• _• ^
- . . mot+ �+= -►- • • •-
�..a 1f _- =at•=a,
_ ••1 •hk1= ••..
� va
mil. f =• �:_ ••.11.=.l •.] � -
•IS � ^
i•
°'��; ':u,, "�.��,.-�. .'� �^,� "`tom �v �."' u • .z.
F.
6•.11:.1i1 :ii w !;-It-:3.-_ 3' �T1 r�' •) .•� .1-
-Y11i. • .� _ .
- ;1:.,- -••I.....��.. .fit:•E.F F. ♦' _/.
11.•• ' .1. .� '�� ••ll"•1. •) '•a) ,all •) �- •}-� .•,�'
i _ - _ - •a. = n 1 -` yr :a' •.` =1 . .h -- •^t-
�.- '/ ..• _ =.n .:. I. `=• .. • Rom- -.c. ..)- • -
age i4=.Jv
' tt••: I -_:• �-.' •.•:1.1=J-' •]. ..•.•S. .lil -'�I -1 G• ,•'1'• �-1:• -
• .- 06 •' - • i rIF 11 ,It•»-7 G y - /• _•: -1 •: }. •ram:= s f. - +!�I
0 lilt
Iwa, III
of
1
41,.•'11'I Jil��1 JF - H }• -
•j -
^4;. _-a _. .1,II� r/--= �•'•aA.;#,� .�;7, •.;:T...,. .1 •i —_'i .Ys
l`
At
10
1
�:•Il It =.At 4.=4r •) • •.' .:• ,•. — •f • — •. ..•^ — •
Own 11
• • . • ♦l =•
Am
P -a- EW 94, 1992
CM that t J 8tat"d that use of thS IS vEty li;Rited
andi with the y he sm�
would appromed the r line I meted that she
Cmuittee Member felt that the =kbwsdme was vat �Oatible with
a GraeTc lmk in Cie but that it m neat be veay =ttfirale far here in
�•
On a 4-0 vote, A�licatiaei 1 .92, was cmtinued to the
ve M 9, 1992 in car for the applicant to PmVide a
clLawing and to Ccs
ve i,der a different cmlar Scheme.
9• Nim*es of the regular meeting of I' ' 10, 1992. on a 3-0 vote the
minutes were approved as sutmittred.
Ommdttee fiber LiM reported that there was still several political
advertisement signs cn De Area Blvd.
Omoittee Member Lwios asked if staff mild bring the application for
WOOamcks bads to ASAP on the MW& 9 meeting.
amImittes Mm b?r Jackson a of hoes to regulate the
In-ightness of signs. ccrxxM
Om atittee Member Iavios expressed cwWSrn with the type of information an
appl$catiort and the quality of exhibits. information explained to the Ommittee
/t�hat�,. she has spoken with Planning C=ir loner FazeIm s regarding the Mir�aite
:d which was sent to ASAC.
It was d theCommittee Rembers of a proper method of
am oaminic aticns between OCUMittee's and Cmnissiens. It was agreed that
OmirPwscn H a would �k to �w Sor w—n It was also agreed a
mig
the abut them lade � red rS ar. mieAsAC �d speak to m yor sox�enr-en
00 mnittee Memb, Iavios spoke of improving the effectiveness of ASAC.
CtWkittee Member Jackson expressed =1082m with neon signs and the best way
to regulate them. She stag that they seem to be getting to be a problem
thrOL34hout the city.
Frank Strazzarino, duo Chaftw of CmVerce, addressed the C mmittee Megmbexs an the issue of new signs.
® NEWod+
Tbw Robillard OVIained to the C m mittee than rubs of the fcvdn Act in
reTdrds to AW members attending a 1 for the of
CmWCG regarding solution f� � He �]ained that the best
lam. than two (2) ASAC meso attend the
S W,
• ' F es blMyi 24, 1M
t M�s �4�16m1� -
ths CIMittee that In repxft to the rW,,t :e r
a ratio of hS MXW not be able to lack Irft that:
Mtn • ZaBUYI b 001ai ed that a CWaElf Office did not
iise any cif fc r t%n ft=B ®iSM within the tillage.
7he C=Ittee Mmime asked if it was qWrqglate far the Code Enforcement
Officer to be signswithin time Center Mddi am not visible to
the pt aic rf�trt-erg- ,
71m E that there was no awtber Wdate than that was
stated in the staff cmmmft.
iI
At 11:30 P.M• to the negtt raPlar to be held an Mil 9, 1992, 7:30
P.M•, Confewerm Deem at.
PAMED
BY: APPROVEDBY•
itAiSms R.Planner —:2- -
and Site AvprGvaL Camittee
ATTEST
City Clerk
amended 3/24/92
asac/Min2--24