Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutASAC Minutes - 02-10-1992 1'iY'1':i 1.'i-"•;'. AflD w9'.! i'•'ofI %:*a'p�• 1, ...+rv� 1 .`i7 t ti<:rw !�" -.t;I: `2JL"#/ : "'1�1..7-,f 1 •J" t_i12 'L�.,is � . j:" ?D. f �;. '�e' w�. k.ii y�l" *" t-`f: M �)" ••`.T*:x`d 1- 's s:�' "S .46 tO 4c"u1'Jf' ""IN ► A ••' i a !� 'fit. -.�.� l..777, 1 • • .'mil•::,. •: r; - •3 - J'1: ;•:� • YS F. • • '•;JI ��•�• F is =• • 6.w 71 lI - Gi'•:•^ •; ••s • 00:110 got- I1•J 0 r> 150 r Rx ill . '' AM WIDAMS 2- wry 1 ,..1992 C n a 4-0 vote - AGAC 12-"1 was t* the contained ined in the mode, resolution with FindiW 1, d82eted, Finding 3, modified; Cxditicn 9, modified and 0011dition 10, a€lded, to read as follow: Findings: 3) dhat the pylon with the sign is in keeping with tln � of the golf in the area. Cbrditionns: 9) Flans 1 and is based duop E� sign elevation revised ruaxy 10, 1992. February 10, 1992. L3ndsC'ape and irrigation plans, 2 sheets, dated February 10, 1992 and Xerisc ape cartific;ation, 4 Pam, dated January 23, 1992, accept as may be anended by the aarditions enumerated herein. 10 'he -14 ddambar trees are e=Waged to be replaced because of their invasive roots. Replacement trees shall be subject to staff review and approval. The dess<ripticn shall also be cad to read as follows: Of the Architectural and Site Approval C mdttee of the City of Cjpertino aR,Iin4 a sue, precise, landscaping plan, and the design and colors of a pylon at the entzance of an existing golf course. 2. DEGcation 4-AstQ-92 Monta Vista - Paquesting view and approval for a planned deve]. yt sign WxWm for an euistang office center. Located on the kftth side of Stevens Creek Boulevard Ebsterly and adjacent to the st r of Peninsula Avenue. Zt® Dillard reviewed tie staff comments noting the criteria set forth in the sign ordinance and stated that the particular site and sign did not meet those criteria. Staffs recommendation is for denial of the pied sign. Bob Slavik, Manta Vista Associates, explained the need for his tenants to have OTormum on Stemens Cheek Boulevard. He explained the problems with C31-'&am fearing and walls which are in place. He showed examples of other monuments signs in the Monta Vista area with multiple tenant names. Committee ASember Lavios explained that she felt the site does need a MUM* sign, but that eight (S) tenant names were to many. She suggested that the applicant provide more inforcation on the sign diagram and that the words Stevens Creek Boulevard does not reed to be on the sign and not repeat the address numbers. Omdttaee Member Weber agreed that the site needs a monument sign but that it should just have the center name, the address fi2Wxm and no tenant rmmm on the sign. He suggested that the sign can be shortened significantly to acoonmeodate this criteria. .. � ♦-i t?.?/." .w _ -=t9 r.•..=1 .�Ye .:. r_L..='e. r.''.,'� �:- -�.w:. r Z•;•f �... p. . 'tt�-�,! {q,.'?lt aP; �s:1..`..'3 r .:..I {I••.� V: � •: "f '• :.rJ p.�- -• _' d;r'll..t1 .. •1 •{. �r•1'-..I IT •), =i-' • 'd ��� ma's.It-11 =-Il•.•' .. •::-i r:.• ".• .:•-a _ J. ... :• _ • - • �.N••! d:',. 7,•al is .•:•' < •FI - _• •`:[' - .. 1: �'.it it' - GIt ,.<. .._• '... :.._ ".• •- ...il. :S '.. ' -• .1� ,.-� .' >lll- •1 "3 = it .:^ •). � .._ il•.rf�11 � -- =:Ir•=t •:. �•; 1. •} �•S :•)i.. ; - - �•1- _{=- Gti� - .111:` _ •.. ._r ••'trn: - mil:._l_o !4t �:x" .1•.'•1 -• '•.:��•. l••) as • ,• .••1, •: :.i. .• • G• ^'•1 - � - IVY. +a:1: "f": .1�. • :?: at:A:-� *.F i?.e1 • .} i=:i. Ynr :s#, =T• �-r efm: - c:'n raa; :.;t '-s 1 ,- �•1t 11 - �Il � _ ll!1 '=- �/.� - 5.. -- M11��a::i � .�1 ' C•. ♦; .114.'r-.. •. i•aFf1:G "�:^ ., .• _♦ -++..- 'r,__ �i.4 •1..• _Y.:may .: � C,..,r.)':s •: ' _., .-• - . �� 1. a tits •_ A 11 1 at 1 �