Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutASAC Minutes - 01-13-1992 OIL _ �.—._ ..___ .- - •r [/ „t •.:t•' .tom .. •I' •Y:It 3c'{i 4fs.`11i1:: •?' 1 L' .`;f't Y, a'7tJ Ir'7• • 11 a. Y' - N I.`� •� y;. air •.d 'f-_�} .' t I �.: - - _ _ _ « .i ;1.•.•v' >.• ..ter — - 11. -" a :•:•t_. = r • .,_ r.to, .'.• a » •.It • . •t. t•-• '.•.•, • Via• .- =• IF•' 1. t •f c•:r ca _ _ Ire � rI. }• .. '•1 �at •_ sue.: ... - .pr-r.-A "IG •1 - r f Fi e • y 13, 1992 Page 2- Continued Ommittee Ylember Lim stated that he Was happily with the appearance of the SSgnia. Ctemittee Member LrAos stated that the rendering has awayed her toward approval of the pact identification signs an the Me did stator that the other signs which staff was referring to fog p ioutian are very different in context and are not necessarily cotVarable with this approval. Cbmittee Member Weber stated that pmoduict Identi4ficatim on restaurants are different and that people need to know cat restaurants sell more so loan what furni ttn1e stamen sell. av& arson 3adman said that she was in support of the proposal. C7a mitt a Ymbet' Iavios questiaied the colors on the monument sign. It was discussed among the ommittee members and the applicant which color would be moot mate for the lines an the sign. It was agreed that sacddlebroun or tan as indicated ion the c.olarr' exhibit would be most aptz opriate. i siara: On a 4-0 vote appli,ceti an 23-ASAL`-91 was approved acanrding to "ie findings and tiaras contained in the model rss©lutien with condition eleven (21) modified to read as follows: Ue colors of the lines behind the tree an the mcmmaent sign shall be scitdcal film sadtdlebrown 7725-139 or tan 7725-39. 2. ligation S-ith & MLtb - Paquesting review and to add two new 3utrmatie teller machines at an existing bank located on the 94rx�M Drive. of C2vek Boulevard a p!aa+orsimately 170 ft. Gast of B and W Tbm fthillard reviewed the staff comments rota ig the scope of the project and stating that staff had no corg=rs with the prgx eyed AMMIS. Michael. Doran, Smith & Smith, reviewed staff cammnts and answered questions of the comittee members. A general consensus of the ocamittee members was that the proposal was acoeptable- Dec s On a 4-+0 vote application 1-ASAC:-92 was approved a%.=Zdinq to the findings and conditions contained in the mock 1 reselu`..ion. Ali I till 5A to 41 44 49 P91 to so r4 44 8104 to log >4.5 .8 EM Am Kimutes Jammy 13, -4- • ®coca I'M 3 - Lod ChaimJadom eWlaineed the histrcmy of the YWA. sae that tics is a hardsbip of ideaificatian, bui ing caonf t.�aari, and location., and tbaat ideratifi0atiensa is . so saw that 91ble' is In mWat of all Ores signs. Mo added that WW's role Im fmr to the sign mtinance and sibaUcins, if the Ma did not neaed an exceptim they would follow, the ordimm. Mr. BWALI=d eqgained that the existing monument sign in not in oonf5=== with the sick ardinaim. 11he sign ordinanca allows ftw graaand sign to be illuminated by ground lie is only and that the existing sign was internally illuminated. He stated that %hLle AMC is reviowing the sign e'smptian for the two sib they ay take into rx sideratian the granting of an emeption for that situation as well. mr. walker egp1aiaaed that he disagreed with ASAC's direction regnding the " " sign. He explained that the could add an a second portion to sign nzber thm oriented towards Saiah Way but could rat ineaoa ate it itato the existing sign or moor.a 1 ;I e it: into the htiildirg• O=aittee der Lavics explained that the majority of the ASAC members would rat approve the third "Ringo" sign and would only comer the sign emotion as a ccuplets package and nr' in in l parts. The cmmdttee member r that the anplicant work with staff and find a way in which all the signs oark far the site. s Ora a 3-0 vote, with Claaitpersar► Jaakan abstaining, application 2 ASAC-92 was continued to the meeting of January 27th in carder far the applicant to return with a move acceptable proposal. 4. AW 3 2 City of - Requesting review and %**oval of architecture for a stru�t to be built around an icy Qatar. Z4ze site is located an Prancio Court appr+oQtimately 140 ft. south of Homestead Load. Ttm Hobillard review the staff coannents noting the of the project and the reason why ASAlC is reviewing this proposal. Zhe general consensus of the crAuaittee members was that the proposal was astable. fon�s s On a 4-0 vote application 3-MAC-92 was aRprav+ed according to the findings and conditicns contained in the model resolution. IMMUMMEM 5. ication 14-X"l Ne"M - Requesting early review of a Use ® Permit for offices and storage in an existing 2,564 sq. ft. building located an the north side of Peninsula Avenue fly of and adjacent to Stevens Creek Boulevard. ul rt Nil jiv . aPtir 101 ID B g �}& .-�-s� "R:st� "� r'���s' "7' - v 4 ».:q ,r� �'> ; .- �it• �'n�" ��,"• `}xr ,.1 1" :7 s4Y 9 •' ... a ,-. r9 •��Il:�t i•+.__ Ott.•-:- _ •" : M' .i�_: y.v.i1 �♦f 71 4r:;i1,.7 � �:.. Kati-c 1,.:: i1. .c__t. _�+ �. irk: • -iU..c.,: u:c •1 `t"'_