HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Minutes - 01-17-1974CITY OF CUPERTINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 94015
Telephone: 252-4505
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
HELJ7 ON JANUARY 17, 1974, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER
CITY HALL, CUP ERrTIN0, CALIFORNIA
Chairman O'Keefe opened the meeting at 7:42 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Comm. present: Buthenuth, Gatto, Nellis, Chairman O'Keefe
Comm. absent:. Adams
Staff present: Director of Planning and Development Sisk
Associate Planner Cowan
Assistant City Attorney Kilian
The Planning Director reviewed the January 14, 3974 Staff Memo
concerning the Town Center plan, which outlines Alternatives B
and C, requested by the Planning Comirssion. Ha said the staff
felt it would be advisable to make it as difficult or as unattrac-
tive as possible for the Town Center property to be developed
individually. It is understood that Alternative A is by far the
most desirable.
Comm. Gatto said the idea of providing incentives for achieving
a complete Town Center has merit. The larger the land group the
higher the intensity should be permitted. He is in favor of the
specialized shops and the social activities for the Town Center.
This can best be achieved with a large piece of ground. The more
willingness on the port of the land owners to cooperate with the
City's goals, the higher the intensity level that should be per-
mitted.
Comm. Buthenuth felt that all the property owners should be treated
the same. If one gets in there first and gets all the commercial,
it just wouldn't be fair. He would not be in favor of Alternate C
because it is discriminating against some of the property owners.
He believes we have the tools to at least have them develop the
same theme. He would much prefer Alternative A and secondly,
Alternative B which is more restrictive.
PC -138
Page 1
Town Center
PC -138 MINUTES OF THE ADJ. REG. MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON
Page 2 JANUARY 17, 1974
Comm. Gatto wanted to confirm with the Planning Director and the City
Attorney that we will be setting certain percentages of uses and a
diagram of where we would like to see these uses within the Town
Center. The Planning Director said the conceptual plan would talk
about interior street pattern, etc. The definitive plan will actually
place the uses on the property.
The Assistant City Attorney said if a property owner does not want to
go along with the conceptual plan he must petition for rezoning.
Comm. Gatto stated the whole backbone of coming up with the Town
Center plan is that the property owners should get together to develop
it. The problem seems to be to get the property owners together.
Alternative B is the plan to allow them to develop individually if
necessary. Alternative C is not the way to go because this changes
the character and flavor of what we are trying to achieve.
Chairman O'Keefe said that with Alternative C we would probably see
relatively quick development. He prefers Alternative A which he
feels will give us the character and the focal point for the City
that we are trying to get. However we have to have Alternative B
because we must not block them entirely from developing in the case
where they couldn't get together.
Comm. Gatto said we must keep in mind the internal circulation. The
Planning Director noted that the Commission has stated previously that
we want Torre Avenue to connect with Vista Drive. Comm. Nellis said
if Torre Avenue is put through to Vista and bisects the undeveloped
Town Center property the Planned Development zone to the east would
be separated from that on the west zone. She was concerned we would
end up with Alternate C.
The Planning Director has stated there must be the possibility for each
individual property owner within the Town Center to develop on his own
property.
Comm. Nellis felt that with the extension of Torre Avenue there could
be the possibility of two planned development zones with-
in the Town Center. She wanted to follow through with that discussion
with the other Commissioners.
Comm. Buthenuth said it would be getting farther away from Alternative
A. Comm. Nellis said if she were told it is simply not possible for
the property owners to get together, she does not want to be in the
position to have to say the only other possibility is to develop
MINUTES OF THE ADJ. REG. MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON
JANUARY 17, 1974
individually. There should be something in between.
Chairman O'Keefe asked for comments from the audience. There were
none.
Chairman O'Keefe called a recess at 8:30 p.m.
Chart B of the Lane Use -Commercial (trips/acre) showing the ratio
of residential to commercial was placed on the bulletin board.
Comm. Buthenuth felt the Commissioners should state what they would
like to see in Town Center and give the staff some guidance so they
can write the Ordinance. He believes that if the economics are
behind it the property owners will come together. He further felt
that giving these alternatives would be defeating our purpose.
Comm. Gatto said a Town Center achieved is better than one partially
achieved. He would be willing to entertain an incentive mode.
There has to be some room for some middle ground. From a conceptual
standpoint we are talking about the type of development that is going
to do something for the City. The Planned Development technique
allows for flexibility and innovation. The Town Center concept was
not one of strictly commercial but rather is community oriented. He
wouldvery much like to leave the option open, even if it is not a
total development. Comm. Nellis agreed. Alternate A is the one we
would all like to see reach fruition. She would like to have the
staff prepare a report on what residential/commercial mix we would
have for 16 trip ends, or 32 trip ends and for something in between.
She would also like more input on this idea of one Planned Develop-
ment zone east of Torre Avenue extension and one Planned Development
zone on the west side.
Chairman O'Keefe asked for comments from the audience. There were
none.
VALLCO PARK
The Planning Director reviewed the January 17 Staff Memo on the
Preliminary Discussion: Vallco Park Conceptual Plan.
Comm. Gatto asked why the City is doing the conceptual plan for
Vallco Park rather than Vallco Park doing their own, The Planning
Director said Vallco Park will assist by working with the City and
giving the City maps, etc. He answered Comm. Gatto the City will
be doing the same sort of thing on those large parcels on Stevens
PC -138
Page 3
Vallco Park
PC -138
Page 4
Vallco Park
discussion
continued
General Plan
schedule
MINUTES OF THE ADJ. REG. MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON
JANUARY 17, 1974
Creek Boulevard and Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road. Every effort will be
made to have this ready for Public Hearing on the rezoning of the
Vallco Park conceptual plan by February 11. Comm. Buthenuth felt
that was too soon. Comm. Nellis said she would like to study this
more in depth before Public Hearings. Comm. Gatto agreed. Chair-
man O'Keefe said he would like to move forward as rapidly as possible.
Chairman O'Keefe asked for comments from the audience.
Mr. Walter Ward, General Manager of Vallco Park, said he has been in
several meetings with the Staff so far. The City will probably have
a recommendation by January 21st for an Environmental Impact Report.
The department store in the shopping center would like to open in
the Fall of 1975. He said they are in limbo on the 55 unspecified
acres. Basically they don't have too much that they would not be
able to present to the Planning Commission on January 28.
The Planning Director stated that the Environmental Impact Report
will be for only the shopping center in Vallco Park, not all of
Vallco Park.
Moved by Comm. Catto, seconded by Comm. Buthenuth, to continue the
Vallco Park discussion to January 28, 1974.
Motion carried, 4-0
The Planning Director next reviewed the tentative General Plan
schedule for residential infilling and lower foothills.
Comm. Gatto said he would anticipate that when the General Plan work
is finished we will have a new document much the same as that done
in the 1964 General Plan. He would like to see this document include
the list' 'of goals to be used as .a framework. He has always felt this
should have been done at the beginning of this study.
ADJOURNMENT
Moved by Comm. Buthenuth, seconded by Comm. Gatto, to adjourn this
meeting at 9:32 p.m. to the next regular meeting.
Motion carried, 4-0
MINUTES OF THE ADJ. REG. MEETING OF THE PLANNING CO11MISSION HELD ON
JANUARY 17, 1974
APPROVED:
Is/ Daniel P. O'Keefe
Chairman
ATTEST:
/s! Wm. E. Ryder
City Clerk
PC -138
Page 5