Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutASAC Minutes - 12-01-1977CITY OF CUPERTINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10300 TORRE AVENUE, CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Phone: 408-252-4505 REGULAR MEETING OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE HELD ON DECEMBER 1, 1977 IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, ROOM 105, CITY HALL, CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SALUTE TO THE FLAG The meeting was called to order at 7:11 p.m. by Chairperson Claudy with the salute to the flag. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Ripplinger, Irvine, Sallan, Chairperson Claudy Members Absent: Bond Staff Present: Mark Caughey, Senior Planning Technici NOTICE: Chairperson Claudy announced that no public hearing will be initiated after 11 p.m. If a hearing is in progress at that time, it will be continued until its completion or until midnight, whichever comes first. INFORMAL REVIEW OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT USE PERI�UT APPLICATIONS: 33-U-77 Jenn Chiu (Chinese Restaurant): Construction of a restaurant containing 7,200 sq. ft. and adjacent commercial square footage containing approximately 7,000 sq. ft. Said property is located westerly and adjacent to De Anza Boulevard approximately 150 ft. north of the intersection of Valley Green Drive and De Anza Boulevard. A concern was raised about the rear of the commercial building which would face Valley Green Drive. Member Sallan commented that some landscaping shoul be installed there. The applicant is providing 5' between the building and the property line. Chairperson Claudy expressed concern that the rear wall would be blank. Member Irvine noted that the parking lot is all dead end parking, allowing no room for turn -around. He suggested that the ends be opened up by eliminat ing a few spaces at the end of each row. He noted that the applicant may know what is going to be developed in the adjacent lot and of the possibility of through -traffic to that lot. Member Ripplinger noted that a trash enclosu location is not shown. Chairperson Claudy commented that he was pleased to see only one curb cut to the property and that off the alley. HC -207 Page 1 No other concerns were raised. HC -207 Page2 IMINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 1, 1977 ASAC MEETING 34-U-77 Devcon Construction, Inc.: Construction of a two-story, light industrial building containing 25,365 sq. ft. located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue. Member Sallan asked the height of the building and was informed that it is 35'. There are several other two-story buildings in the area, so the building would not be overly tall. Chairperson Claudy asked that the Planning Commission request a conceptual grading plan for the site, since there may be a high pad elevation on the lot. This would make the building above the street than 35'. Member Sallan commented that the applicant is providing a lot of landscaping. Chairperson Claudy noted that this project going to be located on a main thoroughfare street and there are several other two-story light industrial buildings in the area. 35-U-77 Circle A Land & Cattle Company: Construction of a professional and related commercial building containing 10,672 sq. ft. located on Lot 5, Tract 5220, Pacifica Drive. taller is not The development will be a condominium office building in which the tenants will own the offices. The applicant is allowing 14½-15' for landscaping on the Pacifica Ave. frontage. The parking spaces will be-lQ'.wide and a 30' turning circle will be allowed. Members informed the applicant that handicapped parking stalls of 12' wide wouldalsohave to be provided. The applicant will build a Eull driveway even though half of it would be on the adjacent property to the east. The architecture will probably be Spanish. sensus: Members had no concerns. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of Regular Meeting of October 20, 1977 Member Sallan moved and Member Irvine seconded that the minutes of this meeting be approved as submitted. Motion carried, 4-0 Minutes of Regular meeting of November 10, 1977 Member Sallan moved and. Member Ripplinger seconded that the minutes of this meeting be approved as submitted. Motion carried, 3-0 Chairperson Claudy abstaining - None COMMUNICATIONS - None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - Mark Caughey noted that three meetings of ASAC are scheduled for the month of December. He said that the number of applications for the rest of the month does not indicate that two more meetings will be needed and suggested that the remaining two meetings in ,December be combined on December 15. Concensus: Members agreed to consolidate the Dec. 8 and Dec. 22 meetings on Dec. 15. MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 1, 1977 ASAC MEETING Mr. Caughey will notify Member Bond of the change in meeting nights. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Application HC -51,395.1 - May Investment Company requesting approval of perimeter fencing for a 28 unit cluster residential development located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Scenic Boulevard. Continued from ASAC meeting of November 10, 1977. L.C.L"lls of 1168 Fairford Way, was present for May Investment Company. The principle concern is to satisfy the Flood Control District's requirement They conducted an investigation of the property and impact of the proposed fence and see no problem with the fence until it reaches the southeast corne of Lot #19. The proposed fence extension into the creek from this point is the flood plain, and is not allowed by the district. It was always intended that there would be a fence installed when the development went in. The fen will be open to allow sight of the open area beyond the development. Chair- person Claudy suggested that the fence might be moved within the property 1. Since there were no comments from the audience, Member Sallan moved and Member Ripplinger seconded" that the public hearing be closed. Motion Carried, 4-0 Member Sallan moved that application HC -51,395.1 be approved subject to Standard ASAC conditions 1-8 and Conditions 9 and 10 as contained herein. 9. That the recommendation of approval is based upon Exhibits G and G-1 of this application except as may be amended by special conditions contained herein. 10. That the recommendation of approval is based upon the proposed design of the fence and is subject to the approval of the Flood Control District Member Irvine seconded the motion. Motion carried, 4-0 2. Application HC -51,443.1 - San Jose Building Designs, Inc. (Silver Oaks West) requesting approval of site, architecture, landscaping, grading and signing for the construction of a combination residential and commercial development located at the northwest quadrant of the inter- section of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard. Mr. Ron Percy of San Jose Building Design, Inc. 1936 Camden Avenue, San Jo was present. The site is the present location of Vic's Curve Inn. NOTE: Due to staff error, the application was not brought before the ASAC for a preliminary review as is required by the zoning laws. The size of the site is 5.1 acres and will have 24 residential units, plus a small shopping center to serve the neighborhood. HC -207 Page 3 pproval of pplication C-51,395.1 HC -207 `MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 1, 1977 ASAC MEETING Page 4 The first part of the discussion had to do with the sound wall. Mr. E.L. Pack had recommended that a 7' wall be installed around the perimeter of the developipen.t to reduce noise from the Kaiser Permanente trucks which pass the corner every day in great number. Another alternative would be to install closable windows and an air conditioning system, which would allow change of air 2 times per hour. Member Sallan commented that there should be landscaping along both sides of the wall and that it should perhaps be lowered for aesthetic reasons. Chairperson Claudy commented that if the wall would serve only an aesthetic purpose, he would like to see it lowered to only 3'. ,Sark Caughey noted that if the Committee modifies the barrier requirement or eliminates the wall, it may have to go back to the Planning Commission. He commented that a 7' wall might not be a very effective sound barrier since the stack height of Permanente trucks is at least 12' above the pavement. Member Irvine said that if the wall is to be used as a sound barrier, it should be left at 7. He stated, however, that the applicant should perhaps jog the wall or install posts periodically to break up the straight expanse. The applicant said that there are three breaks in the wall and there are posts every so often. Chair- person Claudy agreed that from a sound barrier viewpoint , a 7' wall would be the most effective; however, from aesthetic point of view, a 3' wall would look nicer. Mr. Percy said that he would like at least a 4' wall. Member Sallan suggested that this ^discussion be left open until next time so that Staff can work with --the sound engineer to find out -exactly-what is necessary to meet the sound harrier requirement. Consensus: Members agreed to table the discussion of the sound wall until more definitive information could be obtained. The next part. of the discussion had to do with Planning Commission Condition 17 which states that landscaping should separate the commercial and residential. The applicant is providing a 2' wide planter. Member Sallan established from Mr. Caughey that no requirement exists to separate the commercial and resi- dential portions of the development since it is a planned development. It was suggested that perhaps a 3' planter would be more effective. Member Ripplinger expressed concern about the closeness of the buildings to Foothill Boulevard. Member Irvine said that the building is 15' from the street. There will be a 7' sidewalk along the street, which leaves only 8' for the wall and any landscaping. Mr. Percy said that he doesn't think the distance can be changed. Member Irvine suggested that an artist's conception of the site would help the Committee visualize the development more readily. Chairperson Claudy expressed concern about 82' of blank wall in the rear of the commercial portion of the development which would be along the street. Mr. Percy said that whenhe provides the artist's conception of the site, it will not look blank. Consensus: Members requested Mr. Percy to provide an artist's conception of of the architecture before they could make a determination of approval 'r rejection of the site portion of the application. 1ZLNUTES OF THE DECEMBER 1, 1977 ASAC MEETING I HC -207 Page 5 Staff had a concern about the amount and type of open space provided. Applicant now proposes enclosed atriums and a 89 sq. ft. patio off the maste bedroom. Staff is concerned that the proposed open spaces are cold, receive inadequate sunlight (atrium), and/or provide limited outdoor living potential. Member Irvine commented that the open common area would be used more as a place in which to walk, whereas the atriums would be used for out- door cooking, gardens, and etc. Mr. Percy said that the atriums would get some sunlight between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. and that he has an atrium which he uses extensively. Member Sallan commented that people would use private space more than public open space. Regarding the reduced patio size (to 89' Mr. Percy pointed out that these patios would be off the master bedroom and would probably not be used as extensively as the atriums. He also noted that these are 2 bedroom units and there would probably not be many children Consensus: The Members agreed that the configuration presented with atriums and small patios is acceptable. Architecture Discussion The only architecture concern is that of required open space for the 4-plex which is existing and which will be refurbished. 190 sq. ft. is required for each unit and the upper units have inadequately -sized balconies. Mr. Percy indicated that it would be a major change to enlarge the area of the balconies. He asked if the front decking would make up the difference. Staff and the Members of the Committee agreed that it would. Consensus: The Members agreed that the front decking on the 4-plex would make up the required open space lacked by the upper balconies. Landscaping Discussion Mark Caughey asked about the role of the public area. Mr. Percy indicated that there will be little if any game activity, but that it would be more like a garden in which people could walk. Member Sallan asked that the types of planting be carefully considered. Mr. Percy assured the Membe that a professional landscape person would ensure careful selection of plantings. Consensus: Members agreed that, since a detailed landscape plan is not available at this time, this portion of the application should be continued. Lighting Discussion - There were no concerns. Grading Discussion The site is basically flat. More detail will have to be provided regarding drainage. An adequate solution to be reviewed by the Engineering staff at the building permit level. Consensus: Members had no grading concerns. HC -207 1 MINUTES OF THE DECKER 1, 1977 ASAC MEETING Page 6 Signing Discussion The signs will consist of a listing of tenants for shopping center identification. Since all the building frontage is away from the street, it presents unusual identification needs. Each business will also have identification signs on the frontage. A third sign will identify the project as Silver Oaks West and will include the street number. Member Ripplinger commented that 4" high letters identifying the businesses would not be visible from the street to a passing motorist. Consensus: Members would like to see a color rendering of the signing. Audience comments from Mr. Dave McLeroy, 21657 Stevens Creek Blvd., were to ask what kind of tenants would be in the commercial portion of the development and if any final decisions had been made as to tenants. �� V... Percy s _ 7e =r`y saki t de that no finite commitments have been made yet, but that he envisions a deli, barber shop, beauty shop, a small drug store, or other similar tenants. The function of the shopping area would be to serve residents of the area. Member Sallan left the meeting at 9:56 p.m. Member Irvine moved and Member Ripplinger seconded that public hearings be closed. Motion carried, 3-0 Continuance Member Irvine moved that Application HC -51,443.1 be continued to allow of Applica- the applicant to revise the plans for the development. The motion was tion HC -51, seconded by Member Ripplinger. 443.1 Motion carried, 3-0 The Committee recessed at 9:50 and reconvened the meeting at 10:05. 3. Application HC -51,312.1 - Ed Lichtman requesting approval of grading for a single-family residence located in Regnart Canyon west of Regnart Ro ad. Mr. Herbert Ichikawa, 9039 Soquel Dr., Aptos, CA, and Mr. Ed Lichtman, 10731 Ridgeview Way, San Jose, CA, were present. The intent of the Planning Commission is to be sure that there is minimal disruption of the natural grading of the site. Removing the wall along the driveway and moving the driveway westward would maintain the natural. 2:1 slope of the site. The Central Fire Protection District would have to be consulted as to the impact of moving the driveway. Mr. Ichikawa said that he is not sure if the driveway can be moved. Member Irvine said that the type of soil would have an impact on whether or not a wall s:.ould xetained. C<Zairperson Claudy said that a decision could not be made by the committee unless the soil type, damage during construction, and percolation test were made. Mr. Lichtman said that a deep perc. test was taken and percolation is not a concern. MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 1, 1977 ASAC MEETING Mr. Caughey said that the only other concern would be to have a landscape architect's solution for replanting of disturbed slopes presented to staff before building permits are issued. Since there were no comments from the audience, Member Irvine moved and Member Ripplinger seconded that the public hearing be closed. Motion carried, 3-0 Member Ripplinger moved that Application HC -51,312.1 be approved subject to Standard ASAC Conditions 1-8 and Conditions 9-12 as follows: 9. That the recommendation of approval is based upon Exhibit D of this application except as may be amended by special conditions contained herein. 10. All effort shall be made to eliminate the retaining wall depicted in Exhibit D subject to approval of the Director of Public Works and the Central Fire Protection District. 11. On -site material borrow shall be minimized; such borrowing as permitted shall be subject to prior approval of the Director of Public Works and other regulatory agencies as required. All conditions pertinent to erosion control, slope rounding and maintenance of natural terrain as expressed in Planning Commission Resolution No. 1649 shall be weighed in assessing requests to create on -site borrow areas. 12. Prior to issuance of building permits on this site, the applicant shall comply with Condition 20 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 1649; the staff may refer the resulting solution for review by the ASAC. The motion was seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 3-0 4. Application HC -51,444.1 - Green Leaf Gardening requesting approval of a sign program for a commercial building located on the north side of Stevens Creek Boulevard west of the Southern Pacific right of way. Mr. Dave McLeroy, 21657 Stevens Creek Bouelvard, was present. The other tenant in the building, an antique furniture store, already has a sign up. Subject tenant has only a window sign. He would like to retain the window sign as a reader board with changing message regarding sales, etc. It is an antique sign and very attractive. Mr. Caughey questioned if the peanut lights in the window sign could be left in. After looking through the sign ordinance, no mention of this was made and it was concluded that these lights could remain in the sign, but may not flash. Mr. McLeroy pointed out that there is an extreme visibility problem for signing since there are two telephone poles on either side of the sign location. The sign would not be visible from the sidewalk. HC -207 P age 7 pproval of pplication C-51,312.1 HC -207 MINUTES OF THE DECE"1BER 1, 1977 ASAC MEETING Page 8 The gpplicant asked if the wording on the sign could be changed from "Flowers and Plants" to "Plants and Flowers", • and if the word "Florist" could be added at a later date. Chairperson Claudy said that this would be a wording change and would'not have to come back to the Committee, but through Staff only. Since there were no comments from the audience, Member* Irvine moved and Member' Ripplinger seconded that the public hearing be closed. Motion carried, 3-0 Approval of Member Irvine moved approval of Application HC -51,444.1 subject to the Standard Application ASAC Conditions 1-8 and Conditions 9-11 as follows: HC -51,444.1 9. That the recommendation of approval is based upon Exhibit F-2 of this application except as may be amended by special conditions contained herein. 10. The Architectural and Site Approval Committee or its staff shall retain the right to review sign lighting intensity following installation of sign approved under this application, per Section 7.07, Ordinance 746. 11. The spotlights mounted on the roof shall: be painted to match the roof tile. Member Ripplinger seconded the motion. Motion carried, 3-0 UNFINISHED BUSINESS Chairperson Claudy requested that staff write a letter requesting that Cicero's Pizza apply for approval of a sign program. Mr. Caughey will write the letter. BUSINESS ere was none. COMMIISSION NOTES - none e meeting was adjourned at 11:00 p.m. until the next meeting of cember 15, 1977. APPROVED: /s/ John Claudy Chairman ATTEST: /s/ Wm. E. Ryder City Clerk