Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutASAC Minutes - 09-22-1977CITY OF CUPERTINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10300 Torre- Ave., Cupertino, Calif. 95014 Telephone: 252-4505 REGULAR MEETING OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COM14ITTEE HELD SEPTE 2BER 22, 1977 IN THE LIBRARY CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL, 10300 TORRE AVENUE CUPERTI O, CALIFORNIA SALUTE TO THE FLAG The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Chairperson Claudy with the Salute to the Flag. NOTICE: There will be no new hearings initiated after 11 p.m. Any hearings in progress at that time will be continued. The Committee will adjourn at midnight. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Ripplinger, Irvine, Bond (7:13) , Sallan (8:06) , Chairperson Claudy MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Mark Caughey, Senior Planning Technician INFORI�1AL REVIEW OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS: 24-U-77 Brenda Williams: Construction of an 11 -unit single-family subdivision located at 10066 South Blaney Ave.. After reviewing drawings of the proposed subdivision, Committee members expressed concern about the high density in a small area. Member Irvine stated he felt evacuation in case of fire would be difficult because of the fenced -in yards and close proximity of homes. Chairperson Claudy suggested one unit be dropped. Member Irvine noted that the 15yards seem to be too small and he thought the requirement is 20'. Member Ripplinger asked what is presently on the East side of the planned development and was answered by Mr. Caughey that there are single family dwellings there. Consensus: Committee members agreed that the density of homes is too high and that one unit should be eliminated. HC -203 Page 1 HC -203 MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 22, 1977 E -CONTROL MEETING Page 2 25-U-77 Hewlett-Packard: Construction of three 2 -story light industrial buildings located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Homestead and Wolfe Roads. Consensus: Committee Members had no concerns with the proposal. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of Regular Meeting of September 8, 1977 were not available at this time. POSTPONEiEN'TS: There were none. WRITTEN CO NNICATIONS: Discussion of written communications was postponed. ORAL COMMLNICATIONS: There were none. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. App11 t.6 t1 oll HC -51,437.L.1 - Jte VC StVI�'L well dlld T..... " t11Loti�. (Sp J. J. 111 Wheels Skatepark) requesting modification of site, grading and land- scaping for a skateboard park located adjacent to and westerly of Stalling Road. Modifications to the park include moving the location of and expanding the slalom area to the west side of the park, increasing the freestyle area, and moving the bicycle area to the east side of the pro shop near the snack bar. Employees of the park in the pro shop, snack bar and the safety marshal who will be stationed nearby will be able to see the bike parking area. Responding to a question from Member Ripplinger about spectator areas, Mr. Stockwell said that walkways (which will be protected from flying boards, etc by guard nets), and grassy areas will be provided from which people may watch the skateboarders. Mr. Stockwell also discussed the slant of the run walls and the configuration of the bowls and slowdown areas. Member Bond moved and Member Irvine seconded that public hearing be closed, since there were no comments from the audience. Motion carried 4-0 Member Sallan not present at this time. Approval Member Bond moved that Application HC -51,437.1 be recommended for approval of HC -51, subject to the following: 437.1 1. All conditions of approval contained in Architectural and Site Approval Committee -Resolution No. 751 shall remain in full force and effect as regards the subject development. MINUTES OF THE SEPTE ER 22, 1977 H -CONTROL `1EETING 2. The recommendation of approval is based upon Exhibits A 1st Re vision and C 1st Revision except as may be amended :y conditions of approval contained in Architectural and Sits Approval Committee Resolution No. 751. Member Irvine seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-0 Member Sallan not present at this time. 2. Application HC -51,421.2 - Pacific Valley Bank requesting approval of a sign program for Phase One of a financial office complex located at the northeasterly quadrant of North De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard. Phillip R. Boyce and John Fruit of 1245 So. Winchester, San Jose, 95128 were present as applicants. Applicant was asked about a legal problem with the neighboring church regarding use of the driveway. Applicant said there is no problem with the driveway but that a parking problem has not been resolved. Slides were shown of the site. Staff suggested that the directional signs not be illuminated since the bank will probably not be open in the evening. The applicant objected to this, stating that there are no street signs in the area and that the patio bank area will be open 7:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. It is often dark before 3 p.m. in the winter. There will be six signs on the site. Mr. Caughey cited section 7.07.3 of the sign ordinance which say; that illuminated signs must be shut off at 11 p.m. or 2 hours after close of business, whichever is latest. i The principal concern is the height of the main sign, which is proposed at 20 ft above the sidewalk. This is out of line with other signs in the area, the tallest of which is 14 ft.at Any Mountain, Ltd. Staff suggests that the sign be lowered to sit directly on the top of the 3' mound, which should lower the sign to 16 ft. Applicant is agreeable to this suggestion. Regarding the proposed tenant panel,staff suggests that the words "Motor Bank" be eliminated. Applicant said that the words should be "Patio Bank"_ The applicant said he feels that inclusion of _ these words on the sign is important. Staff also suggests that the word "Open"be eliminated in favor of the street address. Applicant thinks that the "Open" sign eliminates confusion on the part of the customer since the patio bank area has different hours than the inside bank area. Staff indicated they did not have any problem with the word "Open" per se, but with the busy effect of additional words. Member Bond commented that it would be evident that when the patio bank is open that the bank is open. He objected to the busyness of the sign. Applican_.,said that one of the lines from the tenant panel could be eliminated in order to keep the "Open" sign. HC -203 Page 3 HC -203 MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 22, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Page 4 The street numbers will be on the side of the building, and will be illuminated by building lights only. Member Bond pointed out that the City is trying to get street numbers put on signs for identification. Applicant said that a time and temperature display will be included in the sign for a public service. He said that burned out bulbs are. often a problem and is in fauor of trying a newly developed time and temperature display that utilizes steadily -lighted neon bulbs behind a baffle. The new display would save 90% of the power and does not glare at night. Member Sallan expressed concern that it would be a moving sign. Applicant said that the numbers on the display would come on quickly, but slightly after one another. All numbers would go off at the same time. The delay in lighting each number is so slight that users of the display have stated that they didn't notice it. There was a lengthy discussion regarding the overall sign size. The sign ordinance states that the sign area must be no larger than 75 sq. ft. The sign is capped or roofed by a small roof which ties in with the architecture of the building. The sign itself is 68 sq. ft. However, if the roof is included in the sign size, the sign is over 120 sq. ft. Applicant said that if the roof is considered part of the sign, he would rather take it off than to reduce the overall sign size. The reason for this is that all Pacific Valley Bank signs are of the same letter size. Letters are now only 2' high, and making them smaller would drastically reduce visability. A poll of the Committee Members was taken, with results as follows: Member Irvine said that he does not think that sign area can be reduced since the letters are already 2' high . He does not personally care for the roof, but would vote for approval of the sign as is. Member Sallan was not comfortable with the interpretation of Staff that the roof structure is not part of the sign. She would like to have an interpretation from the City Attorney. The ordinance says that the sign is the entire area within a single perimeter which encloses the extreme limits o.f the message together with any frame or material of any nature with the exception of a support or base. The question is whether or not the roof structure is considered a support, base, background, or part of the sign. She stated she feels that without an interpretation she would abstain. At this point, Staff commented that if the strict interpretation is taken to mean that it is part of the sign, this would discourage creative signing and is not the intent of the ordinance. Member Bond said that he would support approval of the sign from the view that the roof is not part of the sign. Member Ripplinger noted that the roof does tie in with the architecture and that copy is within limits; however, he felt this may be rationalizing because the Committee likes the sign and that an interpretation from the City Attorney should be obtained. MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 22, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Discussion then turned to the roof -cap portion of the ground sign and whether it should be counted as advertising. area. Chairman Claudy stated he feels that the function of the Committee is to bring good design to the City. He thinks this sign is good and would consider the roof as part of the background. He asked for public input. Mel Brawn, a member of the audience commented that it seems clear that this structure is outside the sign area and it was his opinion that it should be approved. Warren Gilbert, another member of the audience, stated that the elements around the sign are in proportion with and tie in with other elements of the property. He thinks it is well within the sphere of influence of the Committee to make their own interpretation of the sign ordinance. Member Sallan proposed that an amendment to the sign ordinance be made to exclude roof structures from sign area specifically. Chairman Claudy noted that the Committee would not have to approve a roof structure, but if it was esthetically pleasing, there would be no problem. Member Sallan said that she would still like an interpretation from the City Attorney. Mr. Caughey of Staff said that the Committee has the power of interpretation. Chairperson Claudy stated that the Committee should make an interpretation and ask the City Attorney if there is any disagree— ment. Discussion turned to the second ground sign proposed for Stevens Creek Boulevard. The proposed area is 9 sq. ft., which is considered large for a directional sign; however, a visibility problem exists for west bound: drivers along Stevens Creek Boulevard. Member Irvine said that generally a second free-standing sign is not allowed. Chairperson Claudy answered that since the bank fronts on two major streets, the second sign could be allowed; also, the second sign is directional in nature. He stated that the sign would be difficult to see from the street. Member Ripplinger echoed this concern, stating that he doesn't think it will be visible until a driver is almost past it. Member Bond added that he thinks 9 sq. ft. is too large for a directional sign. There was a discrepancy noted in the dimensions of Exhibits F-2, F-3, F-4. Applicant said that the two sizes represent the inside and outside dimensic and that the discrepancy will be corrected. Since there was no further discussion from the audience, Member Bond moved and Member Sallan seconded that public hearing be closed. Motion carried 5-0 Member Irvine expressed concern that if a second sign is allowed, it would set a precedent in which other applicants' second signs would have to be approved. Chairman Claudy said that it should be allowed because it is on two major streets. ns HC -203 Page 5 HC -203 Page 6 Approval of Appli- cation aC-31,42 a MINUTES OF THE STEER 22, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Member Bond moved that Application HC -51,421.2 be recommended for approval subject to ASAC Standard Conditions 1-8 and conditions 9-14 as follows: 9. That the recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits F 1st Revision, F-1, F-2, F-3, F-4 as corrected and F-5 as corrected. 10. That the precise location of ground sign depicted on Exhibit F shall be subject to satisfaction of the Director of Public Works at the building permit level. 11. Exhibit F of this application shall be modified to F 1st Revision as follows: a. Overall height shall be reduced to a maximum of 16 ft. above adjoining sidewalk surface grade level. b. The proposed "`Motor Bank" panel shall be eliminated. c. The proposed neon "Open" sign shall be as inserted in F 1st Revision. d. Street address shall be added on the ground sign subject to Staff approval. 12. The proposed time /temperature panel shall be constructed with internal circuitry prohibiting rapid flashing of information displayed. Flip signals may be used per Staff approval. 13. All illuminated on -site directional signs on the subject property shall be on only during banking hours. 14. The Architectural and Site Approval Committee or its staff shall retain authority to review lighting intensity of any sign installed pursuant to approvals granted under this application per Section 7.07.1 of Ordinance 746. Member Irvine seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken with the following results: Member Rippliriger - aye Member Bond - aye Member Sallan - aye Member Irvine - aye Chairman Claudy - aye A recess was taken at 9:30 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:41 p.m. 3. Application HC -51,383.2 - Good Samaritan United .Methodist Church requesting approval of site modification for Phase One, and architecture, landscaping and lighting for Phase Two. Said property is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Homestead Road and Linnet Way. M DIES OF THE SEPTEMBER 22, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING HC -203 Page 7 Warren Gilbert, 168 Jackson Street, San Jose (the architect) , and Mel Brawn, 1149 Jamestown Dr., Sunnyvale, were present as applicants. Site Staff was concerned about the width of the handicapped parking spaces. The applicant indicated that the spaces are 13' wide and are not clear in the drawing. White paint will be used for, striping in the parking area and red paint in the recreation area (volleyball court, etc.) to avoid confusio . Approximately 10 bicycle parking spaces will be provided. Consensus: Committee Members saw no problem with the site. Architecture The structure will be the same architecture as Phase I which was approved previously. The Committee had no concerns. Landscaping Chairperson Claudy and Member Bond expressed the opinion that Phase I and Phase II landscaping should both have drip irrigation. Applicant will use this method. Applicant noted that they will also use 50% drought resistant planting. Member Ripplinger noted that the current landscape plan does not look like they are 50% drought -resistant. Grading - The Committee saw no problem with the grading plan. Lighting Staff suggested that an additional light be added at the south edge of the parking lot. Applicant will add this fixture. Staff added a concern about the sale of books and religious jewelry in the Phase I multi -purpose building. Applicant said that this is for church members' benefit and is not a commercial concern. Since there were no comments from the audience, :^.ember Bond moved and Member Sallan seconded that the public hearing be closed. Motion carried 5-0 Member Sallan moved that Application HC -51,383.2 be recommended for approval Approval o: subject to standard ASAC conditions 1-8 and Conditions 9-12 as follows: Applicatio: HC -51,383. 9. The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits A 1st Revision, B, B -1, B-2 and 3-3 of this application except as may be amended by special conditions contained herein. 10. All conditions of approval specified in Architectural and Site Approval Committee Resolution No. 615 shall remain in effect as regards this development. HC -203 Page 8 LUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 22, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING 11. Exhibit A shall be modified to include secure bicycle parking facilities in type and quantity satisfactory to the City Traffic Engineer. 12. The proposed landscaping plan for Phase I and II of this development shall utilize drip emitter irrigation equipment in shrubs, trees and ground cover areas. Final landscape plan showing plant type shall be approved by City Staff. At least 50% of all plantings shall be drought tolerant and shall be so certified by a landscape architect prior to issuance of building permits. Member Ripplinger seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0 This application will go to the City Council on October 3, 1977. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (postponed from earlier in the meeting) A letter from Mrs. O'Patti Brisco of Monta Vista was received in reference to street lighting fixtures in the Cupertino Meadows subdivision on Scenic Boulevard. A reply letter was drafted by Staff and the Committee was satisfied with it. Chairman Claudy suggested that it be addressed as the author signed her letter to the City. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Mark Caughey presented new information from the County Transit District on new bus shelters. They will be placed on major streets only if they are installed. A report attached to the regular staff report described the various sizes and materials and benches available. Color slides of existing bus shelters in the San Jose area and Sunnyvale were shown. Committee members expressed concern about room for the handicapped. Some of the shelters have this room. Mr. Caughey noted that the Transit district is in favor of people designing their own shelters. The developer would have his design approved by the City Council and the Transit district and would have to make up the difference between federal money allowed per shelter and the cost. Member Ripplinger commented that he does not think uniformity in shelters is important because different areas look different. Chairperson Claudy said he thinks there would probably be a standard shelter with variations where appropriate. Member Bond said he felt it would be nice to have uniformity along DeAnza Boulevard. Member Sallan said there should be some uniformity involved. Member Sallan asked if Vallco Park had been contacted about the moving sign. Mr. Caughey checked into the minutes of the meeting at which the sign was approved and it says that the sign would not have an extreme flashing message. Staff will contact Vallco Park in writing in this matter. The Committee also requested staff to advise Dean Witter & Co. that they are in violation of the sign ordinance by displaying two wall signs on the same wall of their building. MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 22, 1977 H —CONTROL MEETING Member Irvine commented that the Mini -Storage sign is visible from the freeway. Mr. Caughey said that a temporary permit was issued for the sign until the storage site was occupied. Member Irvine said that he has seen recreational vehicles stored there. Staff will look into this for possible violation. The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 p.m. until the next regular meeting of October 6, 1977 at 7:00 p.m. APPROVED: Is/ John Claudy Chairman ATTEST: Is/ Wm. E. Ryder City Clerk HC -203 Page 9