Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutASAC Minutes - 07-07-1977CITY OF CUPERTINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 Telephone: 252-4505 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE HELD ON JULY 7, 1977, IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL, CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SALUTE TO THE FLAG Chairman Claudy opened the meeting at 7:12 p.m. with the Salute to the Flag. ROLL CALL Members present: Bond, Irvine (8:25), Ripplinger, Sallan, Chairman Claudy Members absent: None Staff present: Senior Planning Technician Caughey Planning intern Kathryn McKenna Chairman Claudy announced that no public hearing would be initiated after 11:00 p.m. and that the Committee would adjourn at midnight. INFORMAL REVIEW OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT USE PERMIT APPLICATION: 13-U-77 Gaetano S. DiVittorio: To allow use of an existing building as a tailor shop located at the northwest corner of the intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Lazaneo Drive. After staff member Caughey had given his report, the committee members agreed they should look at this after Planning Commission had approved the use; they did not feel in a position to make a recommendation for use. 16-U-77 B.A.S. Homes, Inc.: Construction of 37 single- family residential units located adjacent to and westerly of Foothill Boulevard opposite the intersection of Alpine Drive and Foothill Boulevard. HC -197 Page 1 13-U-77 Gaetano S. Di Vittorio 16-U-77 B.A.S. Homes, Inc. HC -197 Page 2 MINUTES OF THE JULY 7, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING The site plan was exhibited by Mr. Caughey. He noted concerns of the staff were: management of natural resource system, adherence to recommendation of Flood Control District for easement and the imple- mentation of recommendations of project geologist. Mr. Caughey stressed need for minimizing interface impact between private and public usages. The ASAC concern related to the difference in elevation on south side, lots 1 to 5, 30 to 35, as relating to Foothill Boulevard, and design of buildings. The possibility of reducing pad heights was discussed. Mr. Jim Roof, MacKay & Somps, San Jose, explained proposal and these concerns were pointed out to him. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Page 3, condition (2) should read: "The east base of the block wall..." Page 2, next to last paragraph, change "resident" to "residence". Pages 6, 7 and 8, replace "Ms. Gates" with "A resident". Page 8, first paragraph, second line, delete the word "towering". Member Sallan moved to accept the Minutes of June 23, 1977 as corrected. Seconded by Member Ripplinger. Motion carried, 3-0-1 Abstain: Bond POSTPONEMENTS : None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: Ms. McKenna advised there was informational input from the City Council regarding landscaping policy which she would report on at the end of the agenda. MINUTES OF THE JULY 7, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Application HC -51,392.2 - Cal Coast Sign Company (Four - Phase) requesting approval of a sign program for an industrial complex located easterly of and adjacent to North De Anza Boulevard and extending southerly from the intersection of North De Anza Boulevard and Route 280 for a distance of approximately 2,500 ft. Renderings of the signs were exhibited. Mr. Eggers, Four Phase Systems, pointed out preferred locations for the signs. Mr. Caughey indicated Mr. Grigg of the staff would have to do an analysis which would probably result in the sign being moved back about 30 feet. Slides of the area were shown. Color chips were displayed. A discussion was held on whether the base would look better as brown or black. Black was preferred. Member Sallan suggested approving the main sign and then having plans presented which would give location and appearance of internal signs. Mr. Caughey provided a sample of type of plan being requested. After further discussion, Mr. Caughey said if the committee members felt comfortable with overall design concept, the staff could approve the locations of the individual signs. The height of the signs was discussed. A slide of a sign at Measurex was shown. Chairman Claudy said he thought it was the single pole that decreased aesthetics of the sign. It was suggested the signs be placed on two small blocks or two poles rather than having the one thin pole. Mr. V. Pittroff, Cal Coast Signs, said it would cost twice as much to put in two poles. Several suggestions were made. Member Ripplinger said he had no problem with the single pole. Member Sallan suggested a continuation so the applicant could redesign internal signs. HC -197 P age 3 HC -51, 392.2 Cal Coast Sign Company (Four Phase) HC -197 Page 4 Public Hear- ings closed HC -51, 392 .2 continued MINUTES OF THE JULY 7, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING The hearing was opened for public comments. A member of the audience said he felt these were good looking signs. There being no further comments, Member Bond moved to close Public Hearings, seconded by Member Sallan. Motion carried, 4-0 Member Sallan moved to continue Application HC -51,392.2, Cal Coast Sign Company (Four -Phase) so the applicant has an opportunity to relook at internal directional signs. Seconded by Member Ripplinger. Motion carried, 3-1 Noes: Bond 2. Application HC -51,015.2 - Straw Hat Pizza (John A. Lowe) requesting exception to -Section 6.03.1 of Sign Ordinance 746 to permit two building -mounted signs for a restaurant located at 20770 Stevens Creek Boulevard. Colored renderings of sign and color board were exhibited. Senior Planning Technician Caughey reported existing sign had been struck and damaged by a truck. Mr. John A. Lower, Straw Hat Pizza, 20770 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, showed a picture of the damaged sign. He said if the exception were not granted, he would keep this sign and raise it to 15 feet so it would not be damaged again. Mr. Lowe pointed out several Straw Hat Pizza places which have the new Straw Hat logos. Mr. Lowe pointed out the sign would be about 18 inches above roof eave line because of steepness of roof at right side of the building. He pointed out the sign is on the edge of the covered walkway and not close to the building. Mr. Lowe answered Member Sallan that there was no way to resolve this. He said the signs were made by the company and any change would be a major cost to him. Chairman Claudy pointed out the ordinance spoke to sign extending over the roof line; only the eave line was involved in this situation and would therefore not be a problem. The sign area was discussed. MINUTES OF THE JULY 7, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING The committee members were in agreement that the proposed sign was much preferred.. Mr. Lowe was assured the sign would be legal if the committee approved the exception. He said he was considering internal remodeling and would not want to have to change signs. He was advised that the addition of two bay windows would require a permit. Member Ripplinger ascertained the trim and sign shades of brown were very close. The hearing was opened to public comment. There were none. Member Bond moved to close Public Hearings, seconded by Member Sallan Motion carried, 5-0 A discussion was held to find criteria for justifying the two signs. Mr. Lowe's letter of June 13, 1977 which indicated need for exposure to traffic from both directions on Stevens Creek Boulevard was referred to. Member Sallan read Section 6.03.1 of Sign Ordinance 746. It was felt the exception could be justified as it met requirements 1, 2, 3 and 5 of Section 103.2 and a, b and c of Section 103.3. Mr. Lowe said there was a second door but it was kept locked because there had been several robberies. Member Irvine pointed out there was one sign on the street frontage and one sign to identify the entrance. Member Sallan felt one sign would be an unnecessary hardship because of lack of identification. Member Ripplinger questioned whether the applicant would qualify because of linear footage of building. The building has a 50 ft. frontage and surface are per sign is 56 sq. ft. Mr. Caughey explained how staff had figured the sign area. Mr. Lowe said he had to have a sign as business had shown a drop since they had had no sign. Member Sallan suggested a continuance to see if the sign could be made to conform to Sign Ordinance. If not, then the applicant could present his reasons for justifying the exception. HC -197 Page 5 Public Hearin closed HC -197 Page 6 HC -51,015.2 approved w/ conditions Recess HC -51,296.41 Nor -Cal Asso (The Koll Company) MINUTES OF THE JULY 7, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING After further discussion, Chairman Claudy suggested approving the sign conceptually if the applicant could reduce the sign by 2 ft. in order for it to conform with the ordinance. The majority of the committee members said they would approve this sign even if the applicant found it was impossible to make the sign smaller. Member Irvine pointed out that since the walkway came down and touched the ground, it could be considered part of the building frontage. Ms. McKenna read the definition of building frontage. After further discussion, Member Sallan moved to recommend approval of sign exception for Application HC -51,015.2, Straw Hat Pizza, with standard H -Control conditions and Exhibits F and F-1. This exception is to Section 6.03.1 of Ordinance 746. The committee makes the findings as follows: (1) That Section 11.01 contains wording under which this committee finds that the granting f t1. • 6a oii�+.itg va. this exception 1S in conformance with the purpose and intent of this ordinance as justified by the following: Section 1.03.2, criteria 1, 2, 3 and 5, and Section 1.03.3, items a, b and c. (2) Further, that the area of the wall signs as proposed is in conformance with the ordinance on the basis of the computation being done to include the linear width of the building and the covered walkway. Reference Section 2.06. (3) Existing ground sign and pole shall be removed at the time the wall signs are mounted. Seconded by Member Bond. AYES: Bond, Irvine, Ripplinger, Sallan, Chairman Claudy NOES: None Motion carried, 5-0 At 9:10 p.m.a recess was called with the meeting reconvening at 9:21 p.m. 3. Application HC -51,296.41 - Nor -Cal Associates (The Koll Company) requesting approval of site, architecture, land- scaping, grading, lighting and signing for a shopping center located at the southeast quadrant of Bandley Drive and Alves Drive. MINUTES OF THE JULY 7, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Two models of the center proposal were displayed. Member Sallan complimented staff on its report. Mr. G. W. Gibson, representing The Koll Company, introduced Mr. Walter Ford from Alpha Beta Stores and Mr. Steve Helgerson, San Jose attorney. Mr. Robert S. Bernstein was representing James W. Foug & Associates, architects. Chairman Claudy ascertained the applicants had received copies of the staff report. It was decided to go through the staff report, item by item. The first item for discussion was the parking stall layout. Mr. Caughey advised the committee that the parking standards had been changed recently and now call for 18 ft. stall length + 27 ft. backup distance,a total of 63 ft. from center. Applicant is proposing 65 ft. dimension. Member Irvine questioned whether this was minimum or required. He noted 65 ft. was standard in most cities. Mr. Caughey was asked to clarify whether the 63 ft. was absolute or minimum. Noting the committee members were unware of change in parking standards, Member Sallan said she thought these things should be sent down to the committee as it directly effected their decisions. It was the opinion of the committee that the 63 ft. figure should pertain to a minimum with the option to have larger dimensions. Mr. Bernstein said they had changed to the 63 ft. since they had been told it was an absolute; however, they preferred the 65 ft. Mr. Ford said Alpha Beta was concerned about narrower width of 9½ ft. stalls because of wide shopping carts, especially those stalls directly in front of the store. They would prefer a 10 ft. wide stall. i Staff member Caughey read Ordinance, Section .002 (q). Three of the committee members indicated they preferred to consider the 63 ft. as minimum and not an absolute. Member Sallan asked for a ruling from the City Attorney to clarify. HC -197 Page 7 HC -197 MINUTES OF THE JULY 7, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Page 8 Chairman Claudy advised this issue could be continued until a clarifi- cation could be obtained. Mr. Gibson said they would be willing to do whatever was required and asked the Committee to consider the 10 ft. stall as originally proposed. A redesigned landscape plan with 9½ ft. stalls was displayed. Referring to three parking stalls north of "B" shop which staff had suggested eliminating, Mr. Bernstein said from Alpha Beta's point of view, there would only be about 25 trucks a week using the back dock and they did not see the stalls as being a problem. These stalls would probably be used by employees and were not intended for customer parking. They were willing to put restrictions on the stalls with the use of signs. Staff member Caughey referred to informational exhibit. Mr. Gibson agreed to move trash enclosure closer to building and putting stalls where --..,1., 1-..,A enclosure had been located. The trash enclosure opening was discussed. Mr. Gibson said they planned to have a roll out dumpster. Mr. Bernstein located the Alpha Beta trash enclosure which he said would be below the wall of the dock. It was noted the other trash enclosure gate would open toward Alves Drive. The 25 ft. wide driveway shown on west edge of Exhibit "A" was dis- cussed. Mr. Gibson explained plans to sell some of the property to Homes Savings and move easement north. He explained plans they are making with Bank of America and Home Savings to make ingress and egress better for all the businesses. With regard to staff's suggestion that a 6 ft. wall should replace the proposed 4 ft. on north side of truck dock facility, Mr. Bernstein said they felt the 4' ft. wall would be adequate with the landscaping they would use. He displayed pictures of another development using this concept. Chairman Claudy noted if there was a mounding only 1 ft. of the wall would be seen. The committee members were pleased with the wall and tree treatment as pictured. Mr. Gibson expressed his willingness to make any change necessary to meet requirements. Staff report indicated proposed tree (Magnolia "Sam Sommers") had undetermined growth habit. Mr. Gibson said they felt the tree would MINUTES OF THE JULY 7, 1977 H —CONTROL MEETING accomplish the desired screening. With regard to acoustical impact on surrounding apartments and Japanese restaurant from truck activity, Mr. Bernstein said the ambient noise on the street would be as loud as any truck activity, especially with the area being depressed and landscaped. Chairman Claudy suggested a 6 ft. wall from sidewalk level with 2 ft. mounding which would deflect any sound coming from the dock area. Mr. Gibson agreed to do this. It was noted that a sound analysis should be made. With reference to ASAC Resolution No. 330, Design Guidelines for northwest quadrant of De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard, Mr. Bernstein spoke to their landscape philosophy and described their landscaping plans. Chairman Claudy pointed out importance of screening cars and pointed out a place where more shrubbery might be needed. Both Mr. Gibson and Mr. Bernstein said that in their experience, shrubs had not proven to be satisfactory. After a discussion regarding walkway links, it was ascertained the walkway between the business would remain but the walkway down the parking lot would be eliminated if the 10 ft. stalls were utilized. At this point, Measurex was advised by Chairman Claudy that because of the lateness of the hour, it was apparent their application would not be heard. He advised that their application would be the first on the agenda of July 21. The applicant requested an extra meeting be held. The committee voted 3-2 not to hold an adjourned meeting. A discussion was held on 911 ft. stalls versus 10 ft. stalls. The standards indicated 10 ft. x 20 ft. which would eliminate the walkway. The committee agreed to send a recommendation to the City Council for 10 ft. x 18 ft. which was their interpretation. Under Architecture, Mr. Bernstein described the store frontages. Most of the fronts would be of aluminum and glass with a small bulkhead. They would recommend using slumpstone and some ceramic tile of dark brown. He referred to exhibited model. The bulkhead for Alpha Beta store would be of red tile. All other bulkheads would be buff. iC-197 ?age 9 Measurex advised of continuation to 7/21/77 It was pointed out that any modifications for a shop would have to be approved by ASAC. HC -197 I MINUTES OF THE JULY 7, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Page 10 With regard to staff suggestion of "eyebrow" roof, Mr. Bernstein suggested continuing wood fascia around on north elevation of shop building. The applicant said all roof mounted equipment would be concealed from public view. It was noted that the Magnolia "Sam Sommers" had been approved on evidence of the pictures. Member Sallan noted the rear of building was stark and suggested some relief could be obtained by the planting of trees. Mr. Ford said this was a work area and plantings would interfere with operations. Also the plants would be endangered by operations. An espaliered vine was suggested. Mr. Gibson felt anything planted at the rear would be unsatisfactory and suggested training the vine to go around the corner. He said they would make an effort to bring some plants into that area. Chairman Claudy ascertained the transformer on the property would be screened. Member Sallan pointed out there should be some screening to block the view of the trash enclosures of A shops. Mr. Gibson agreed to do maximum landscaping possible in the 5 ft. available. He also agreed to plant a tree at northeast corner of A shops. Member Sallan suggested a tree be planted at the corner of west elevation of B shops. Mr. Gibson said they would like to landscape the restaurant area without approval. They would like to carry out landscaping to a reasonable depth and then stop it. Member Irvine suggested going to the 20 ft. setback line. This was satisfactory with the committee. Mr. Bernstein said they were amenable to putting in more trees, as suggested. Relative to lighting, Mr. Bernstein displayed a brochure of fixture and described their proposal. The Weyerhauser fixtures would be used at peripheries for continuity but they would like to use an energy efficient light on a higher standard. This will enable them to use fewer fixtures and be afforded more light. The standards would be 30 ft. high. MINUTES OF THE JULY 7, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Mr. Bernstein said there would be four of these tall luminaires in the center area. Member Irvine said he thought what the applicant was proposing made sense. He felt guidelines of Resolution No. 330 were too tight. Mr. Bernstein said he felt the energy crisis would justify using the Gardco standards rather than what was called for in the guidelines. Member Ripplinger questioned how the two standards would blend. This was discussed. Chairman Claudy said he liked the idea of consistency but in this situation the higher standards seemed to be more sensible. Member Sallan suggested modifying approach to guidelines, that Weyerhauser fixtures could be used on the peripheries and the Gardco on the interior parking lights. She felt there should be consistency in future developments in this quadrant. The difference in light patterns because of two fixtures was dis- cussed. It was agreed the light bulbs in the Weyerhauser fixture should be the same as existing and the Gardco should correspond as closely as possible. It was determined the metal poles would serve as protection from cars. Relative to signing, the ground sign was discussed and exhibit studied. It was agreed the sign was satisfactory. Mr. Bernstein described the market wall signs. He said the letters would appear dark during the day and at night become lighter as it was illuminated. Member Sallan questioned having 3 ft. letters. Mr. Bernstein said it was visually appropriate proportion -wise. Mr. Gibson pointed out they are not requesting a pole sign on Bandley Drive. Since Alpha Beta is 150 ft. from Stevens Creek Boulevard, they think this is a minimal proposal. He said they would be coming back for individual shop signs. Member Irvine said to be realistic Alpha Beta needed building signs from De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard. Member Sallan agreed but felt the De Anza Boulevard sign should be scaled down to conform with ordinance. HC -197 Page 11 HC -197 Page 12 Public Hear- ings closed MINUTES OF THE JULY 7, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING After further discussion, signing was continued to allow applicant to present a scaled down version for east elevation plus a program for rest of tenants in the center. Mr. Gibson said the signing was crucial to his agreement with Alpha Beta and he would like preliminary approval of Alpha Beta signs. Chairman Claudy advised the approval would be a conceptual one. The hearing was then opened to the public for comments. There were none. Member Bond moved to close Public Hearings, seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 5-0 Member Bond moved approval of the site, architecture, landscaping, grading and lighting portion of the Application HC -51,296.41, Nor - Cal Associates, with the following conditions: 1-8. Architectural and Site Approval Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the special conditions enumerated herein. In the event a conflict does exist, the special conditions as enumerated herein shall apply. 9. The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits A, B, B-1, B-2, D, E, and staff informational of this application except as may be amended by special conditions contained herein. 10. Layout of parking stalls on Exhibit "A" shall be revised to 18 ft. length, 10 ft. width with 27 ft. backup space. This recommendation is in accordance with the committee's inter- pretation of Ordinance .002 (q). 11. The applicant will be changing location of three stalls and a trash enclosure on the northwest corner per Exhibit C- 1st Rev. The trash enclosure will open to the north. 12. The wall to the north on Alves Drive side of property shall be 6 ft. high from the sidewalk grade with a 2 ft. mounding of the landscaping up to the wall. The Committee shall require the applicant to have a sound analysis study run and this shall be filed with the City. The study will show that the noise level on Alves Drive will not be significantly increased. MINUTES OF THE JULY 7, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING 13. The Committee recognizes that the property lines and circu- lation easements depicted on Exhibit A of this application do not in all cases reflect those approved under Application 1 -TM -72 and recorded on Tract 5162. Approval of a temporary driveway opening a minimum of 32 ft. wide at back of walk on the west side of the subject site may remain in effect until an application for development of the Home Savings and Loan site as it is configured on Tract 5162 is approved, or until a tentative map adjusting property lines and easements in the vicinity of the common boundaries of Lots 2, 3 and 4 of Tract 5162 is approved by the City Council. At such time as City Council may elect, the above mentioned temporary drive- way opening may be relocated, eliminated or reconfigured in accordance with Exhibit A of Architectural and Site Approval Committee Resolution No. 330, or such other reasonable urban design guidelines, as City Council may require. The parking lot improvements associated with the subject development may be constructed within the driveway easement north of Lots 3 and 4 of Tract 5162 provided that the applicant shall supply to the Director of Public Works at the building permit level written documentation from the lessees of Lots 3 and 4 agree- ing to the construction of such improvements. 14. The restaurant portion of the subject development applica- tion is not approved. However, the applicant shall provide a landscape setback in this area as it is depicted on Exhibit A 1st Revision to a depth of 20 ft. on the Bandley Drive frontage thereof. 15. Store fronts of individual shops shall be enclosed in a manner similar to the store front of the subject Alpha Beta Market; that is, clear glass set in bronze anodized frames with an underlying buff colored bulkhead. Deviation from this standard shall require prior approval of the Architect- ural and Site Approval Committee. 16. The wooden fascia on the east elevation of the "B" shops and the west elevation of the "A" shops shall be continued on the north wall of both shop complexes terminating at the junction of said north wall with the east and west walls respectively of the market building. HC -197 Page 13 HC -192 Page14 HC -51 ,296.41 approved w/ conditions MINUTES OF THE JULY 7, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING 17. Landscaping shall be as referred to in Exhibit C 1st Revision with more shrubs and one additional tree adjacent to and screening trash enclosure near "A" shop; one tree shall be added to the northwest corner of the "B" shops to conceal public view of the trash enclosure and two more trees on the east property line as shown on plan. 18. The lighting plan for the subject development shall include Weyerhauser fixtures described in Section 4a of Architectural and Site Approval Committee Resolution No. 330 at the peri- meter of site; the parking lot lighting fixtures may be the Gardco type specified on Exhibit A 1st Revision. Emitted light color from the Gardco fixture shall be closely identical to that of the Weyerhauser fixture when installed. 19. Final layout of exterior lighting fixtures shall be subject to staff approval. City Traffic Engineer shall examine the lighting plan at the building permit level to ensure protec- tion of the public from excess lighting intensity or spill- over onto adjoining properties or rights -of -way. Seconded by Member Irvine. Mr. Gibson assured Member Sallan they would try to do something on the north wall to relieve starkness. Member Ripplinger said he was not sure the Committee had done the best for Cupertino on this application with regard to the landscaping. AYES: Bond, Irvine, Sallan, Chairman Claudy NOES: Ripplinger Motion carried, 4-1 Chairman Claudy advised this application would be heard by the City Council at its July 141977 i4eeting. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: Member Sallan gave staff member Caughey an article to be copied and distributed to Committee members. MINUTES OF THE JULY 7, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING INTER COMMISSION NOTES Planning intern McKenna distributed a copy of a letter from City Council regarding the landscaping moratorium. ADJOURNMENT At 12:35 a.m. the meeting was adjourned to the next regular meeting on July 21, 1977 at 7:00 p.m. APPROVED: Is/ John Claudy Chairman ATTEST: Is/ Wm. E. Ryder HC -197 Page 15