Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutASAC Minutes - 02-24-1977CITY OF CUPERTINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA iHC-188 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino I Page 1 Telephone: 252-4505 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE HELD ON FEBRUARY 24, 1977 IN THE CONFERENCE ROOM, ROOM 105, CITY HALL, CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SALUTE TO THE FLAG The meeting was opened at 7:03 p.m. by Chairperson Sallan with the Salute to the Flag. ROLL CALL Members present: Bond (7:05), Claudy, Irvine (8:10), Ripplinger, Chairperson Sallan Members absent: None Staff present: Senior Planning Technician Mark Caughey Chairperson Sallan announced no public hearing would be initiated after 11:00 p.m. and that the Committee would adjourn at Midnight. INFORMAL REVIEW OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS: 1. 3-U-77 Woolworth Construction Company: Construction of 3-U-77 approximately 60,000 sq. ft. of commercial build- Woolworth ing space located at the northwest corner of the Construction intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Blaney iCompany Avenue. Comments: Corner has high visibility and builders are encouraged to promote identity of neighborhood by design creativity. Reciprocal easements for coordinating access between this development and existing businesses. Parking behind 7-11 Store be conditioned for employees only. I Internal trash enclosures needed and trash areas enclosed. Angled parking off Blaney Avenue if possible. Large containers or planters at building entrance. Discourage parking in front of entrance. Landscaping between Woolworth building and Fireside Thrift. HC -188 Page 2 Minutes of 2/10/77 approved as amen de d MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Page 2, paragraph 3, second line, should be Los Angeles rather than Los Altos. Page 3, paragraph 3, second line should read, "...positive reaction to the building being proposed." Page 5, paragraph 2, should read, (1) That after detailed.....the architect, they be submitted to....". Page 5, paragraph 7, first line, delete "they" and replace with "that the applicant". Page 4, paragraph 6, line 3 should read, "....She agreed there was less than desirable relationship .....". Member Claudy moved to accept the Minutes of February 10, 1977 as amended. Seconded by Member Bond. POSTPONEMENTS: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Motion carried, 4-0 Federal Signs 2. County Referral of Sign Application - Federal Signs Staff member Caughey explained the property in question was near Rancho Rinconada and might some day be in the City. He explained the sign was in the County but since it was so near to the City limits, it was being sent to the City for recommendation. Mr. Caughey pointed out that the sign being proposed was two feet over the 20 ft. limit in the ordinance and had more than three tenants, the limit allowed in the ordinance. Slides were shown of the current sign and also signs on the individual businesses. Mr. Caughey noted staff would recommend denial unless the owner would agree to initiate a new sign program in the center. Mr. Mike Robins of Federal Signs said he agreed the tenant signing was some of the worst he had seen. He pointed out the present center sign was constructed twenty years ago. He displayed a colored rendering of the center sign he was proposing. He did not think they could fit this twenty year old strip shopping center within the new ordinance. He spoke of the many problems he had encountered in working on this sign. He said the owner was trying to up -date the center. He could make the sign 20 ft. but could not decide which tenants would have to be knocked off the center sign. He asked to be given the opportunity to up -grade sign and he would work on the other tenants to up -grade their signs. MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Member Claudy advised Mr. Robins there could be three tenants on each side and these could be rotated. Chairperson Sallan said she felt the new sign would be a significant improvement. She briefly indicated key points of new ordinance and suggested he might want to include these in another sign design. Mr. Robins said he thought the County would act on this design as it had already been filed with the County. Member Claudy also felt this sign was an improvement and said he would recommend the County approve it subject to its being lowered to the 20 ft. limit in ordinance and three tenants. He also said the appli- cant should be required to come in with sign program so that when a tenant changed, the sign program could be initiated. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None PUBLIC HEARINGS: 3. Application HC -51,027.15 - Taylor Wheeler Planning Corporations i Since the applicant was not present, Member Claudy moved to continue ! this item to the end of the agenda. Seconded by Member Bond. Motion carried, 4-0 4. Application HC -51,341.4 - Elliott's Yardage requesting approval of change of copy for an existing wall sign located on the west side of De Anza Boulevard north of Rodrigues Avenue. Staff member Caughey referred to staff memo of February 24, 1977, noting the existing sign can on the east wall of the subject building was refaced to indicate the new tenant without approval or securing of building permits. He also advised the applicant would be utilizing the Lambert's portion of the existing ground sign. Member Claudy said he was concerned that a sign company would not know a permit was required. Mr. Caughey suggested a handout could be pre- pared to give to the business community to cover these procedures. HC -188 Page 3 HC -51,027.15 Taylor Wheeler �ontinued to and of agenda 3C-51,341.4 Elliott's Yardage HC -188 Page 4 MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Slides were shown of the site and existing signs. i Colors for the Elliott's Yardage signs are dark brown for the' copy and I bright yellow for the background. Mr. J. Rathjens, Elliott's Yardage, said the yellow and brown were their identifying colors. They had adopted these colors because the sign at i their Camden store had these colors. The applicant apologized for not getting approval. Since they were not changing the can, they had not thought an approval would be necessary. It was noted the other signs in the center had white or off-white I backgrounds. Member Bond said he thought the intent was that the white background would be used as the signs changed in the center. He suggested having i a white background with yellow letters. Mr. Rathjens said they would prefer to keep the yellow background but if this were not allowed,•they would prefer to go to brown letters on an ivory or white background. The same would be used on the ground sign. Member Ripplinger ascertained the brown letters were opaque. Slides were shown again of the center signs; all had white backgrounds. The applicant said he would be changing the sign as soon as possible. { He ascertained the spool logo could be retained. The hearing was then opened to the public for comments. There were none. Public Hear- Member Claudy moved to close Public Hearings, seconded by Member Bond. ings closed Motion carried, 4-0 Member Claudy moved to recommend approval of Application HC -51,341.4 subject to standard H -Control conditions and the further conditions that the yellow background color be changed to a white, matching as closely as possible the liquor store sign; and with the further conditions that the existing logo on current sign which is not shown on Exhibit F be allowed to. remain. Lighting intensity is subject to HC -51,341.4 i review at a later time. Seconded by Member Bond. approved w/ Motion carried, 4-0 conditions j Chairperson Sallan advised the application would be heard by the City Council at their March 7, 1977 meeting. MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING HC -188 Page 5 At 8:10 p.m. the hearing was adjourned to the Council Chambers because of the number of items to be considered on the next application. The hearing was reconvened at 8:20 p.m. 5. Application HC -51,017.3 - Sunny View Lutheran Home requesting approval of site, architecture, landscaping, grading and lighting for a senior citizens housing project located easterly of and adjacent to Foothill Boulevard approximately 100 ft. northerly of the intersection of Cupertino Road and Foothill Boulevard. Continued from H -Control meeting of February 10, 1977. Slides of the site were shown. Staff member Caughey referred to conditions contained in Resolution No. 1627. He noted Site plan Exhibit A of this application showed a "pocket'? extending into planter area along the west property line, which seemed inconsistent with the intent of Condition 16 of Resolution No. 1627. Condition 17 related to noise and visual screening of corner because of the heavy traffic. The acoustical consultant was recommending a 6 ft. acoustically opaque wooden wall rather than the originally proposed concrete wall. Mr. Caughey pointed out two small lots at the southwest corner of the project area adjacent to Cupertino Road should be designated as contin- gency parking areas under Condition No. 18. He pointed out an access route in the extreme northwest corner with a break -away gate was provid for emergency vehicles. The concern for successful interface between the Sunny View West and the existing triplex/fourplex developments on Salem Avenue was noted. Mr. Jay W. Mitchell, 701 Welch Road, Palo Alto, said the "pocket" on Foothill side was necessary as a turn -around for the trash truck. He pointed out trash pick up as recommended by the City Council. He said the pocket could be reduced to 20 or 25 ft. width. Mr. Mitchell answered Chairperson Sallan that the visual impact would be a minimum. A row of trees would be monotonous. Mr. Mitchell said they could bring screen planting along road and also closer to the buildings. He did not feel the buildings should be blocked; just screened and softened. He thought the deciduous trees would be of benefit to the residents by allowing the sun to penetrate and also providing for a variety of view. HC -51,017.3 Sunny View Lutheran Hoi HC -188 MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Page 6 Mr. Mitchell answered Chairperson Sallan the trash area would not be seen. He used exhibit to support this contention. He said the high landscaping would be on the inside of the fence. Member Claudy pointed out there would be a "pocket" where there would be no landscaping on fence or on building side. Chairperson Sallan said she did not see a problem since there would be landscaping on both sides of the fence. Mr. Mitchell said the 75 ft. pocket could be lessened. Chairperson Sallan suggested a tree be added on the outside of the fence. Mr. Mitchell answered Member Claudy the existing fence by vacant lots would be removed. Mr. Mitchell then explained the sound situation, both exterior and interior. He said the cost of the concrete wall would be much greater than the redwood fence. According to the constultant, the redwood fence would be adequate. Mr. Mitchell answered Member Ripplinger that the fence would reduce the sound at the periphery of corner although not as much as at patio area. The corner areas are parking and not so critical. With respect to the contingency parking area, Mr. Mitchell exhibited their proposal for additional parking as required. They have added 12 spaces and 34 more places can be provided. It was ascertained the Committee members had no concern about the red- wood wall. Regarding relationship to neighbors on Salem Drive, Mr. Mitchell referred to line of sight drawing and explained planting barriers. The nearest buildings are 90 ft. He also displayed elevation of Building C. Mr. Mitchell said there would be evergreen trees that would give year round screening. Mr. Mitchell answered Member Ripplinger the ground cover had not been determined as yet. It was ascertained a covered walk would connect all buildings. Mr. Mitchell displayed a plan showing existing trees, which ones would be removed, which ones replaced and incorporated into landscaping and which ones would be retained. He said they had tried to save all trees of significant value. MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING ;HC -188 iPage 7 Chairperson Sallan suggested staff make an on -site inspection of the trees. Member Claudy pointed out one tree in particular that should be saved. Chairperson Sallan commended the applicant on his excellent exhibits and presentation. Member Claudy ascertained the landscaping architect was not present. With regard to architecture, Mr. Mitchell described the materials that would be used. The intent was to have two neutral colors for variety. Final colors would be submitted for staff approval. The bus shelter was discussed. Chairperson Sallan said the Planning Director should assemble representatives from the County, City and design people to prepare a plan for the bus shelters. Chairperson Sallan ascertained this was not the final landscaping plan. She said the committee could make suggestions and the final plan could be presented to staff or brought back to this committee. Chairperson Sallan referred to Building C. Member Claudy suggested if the residents on Salem Avenue wanted more trees, this should be worked out between the applicant and the residents. He agreed the evergreen trees would cut off light. Member Bond agreed some of the residents might prefer the visibility and not want the screening. Chairperson Sallan ascertained the residents were notified of this hearing. She suggested the residents could be contacted by Mr. Mitchell and this could be left unresolved at this point. Member Bond said in his opinion the mixture of deciduous and evergreen trees was good. Member Claudy said the courtyard would be a gathering place and he would, like to see a few more benches added. Mr. Mitchell said the intent of the inner area was just as a "pass through" rather than a gathering place. Mr. Mitchell answered Chairperson Sallan that the intent of the perimeter design on Foothill Boulevard for fence and landscaping, was to break up linear quality. HC -188 MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Page 8 Chairperson Sallan suggested a tree be placed on outside of fence at pocket. Mr. Mitchell said he would see if they could find a.tree that would not lift the sidewalk. An exhibit of the lights was shown. Two types of lighting will be used. Mr. Mitchell said they wanted to keep the intensity as low as possible and still retain safety. Chairperson Sallan noted she felt the clear glass globes would be harder to look at. Mr. Mitchell said the globes would be of a bronze tint. Mr. Mitchell said the signing would have to date. The hearing was opened for public comments. Public Hear-, Member Bond moved to close public hearings, ing closed Member Bond moved to recommend approval of standard H -Control conditions and following be presented at a later There were none. vecQn dOd 1 -vu' Mi-nh r ('1 ttidv Motion carried, 5-0 4pplication HC -51,017.3, conditions: (1) The opening of landscaping opposite the trash compactor on Foothill Boulevard be reduced to a minimum distance for refuse trucks to turn around. (2) The barrier on Foothill Boulevard to be a redwood fence. (3) As far as trees to remain, the staff will observe the trees that are listed as remaining and those to be removed and if there is any concern about those, they can respond to the Committee at that time. (4) The gate at emergency exit will be subject to the staff approval after agreement between the applicant and the Fire District. (5) The landscaping has been conceptual approved with the changes at the close proximity of Building C to the neighbors to be worked out between neighbors and the applicant. Final approval of landscaping will be given at later date, by this Committee. Seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 5-0 MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING HC -188 Page 9 Chairperson Sallan advised the application had been approved with the exception of the landscaping which was continued. The approved portion would go before the City Council on March 7. At 9:23 p.m. the meeting was returned to the Conference Room. 6. Application HC -51,380.1 - Herbert Cuevas requesting approval of modification of conditions of approval for a commercial building located at the northeast corner of Scofield Drive and South De Anza Boulevard. Since the applicant was not present, Member Irvine moved to continue HC -51,380.1 to the end of the agenda. Seconded by Member Claudy. Motion carried, 5-0 Chairperson Sallan announced that items 10 and 11 might possibly not be heard. It would be decided at the end of the meeting whether or not to hold a special meeting to hear items not covered tonight. j HC -51, 380.1 j Herbert i Cuevas Continued to end of agenda 7. Application HC -51,385.1 - Edmund F. Schnieders, Jr. request- iHC-51,385.1 ing approval of modification of landscaping and lighting for iEdmund F. a 106 -unit townhouse project located at the northwest corner !Schnieders, of Homestead Road and North De Anza Boulevard. !Jr. Mr. Roger Presburger, 13514 Hart St., Van Nuys, answered Member Claudy that the entire wall around the project would be built as part of Phase I. Mr. Presburger answered Chairperson Sallan that they had tried grasscrete and it failed under heavy traffic conditions. A sample of Bomanite was displayed. Mr. Presburger said the grasscrete forms come only in 4" depth and 6" is necessary to prevent its failure. Aesthetically they liked the grasscrete but functionally it is questionable. He pointed out other safety factors, such as its causing cars to slide when the grasscrete is wet. The cost of the Bomanite and the grasscrete are comparable. He said the 4" form would be satisfactory in a parking lot but not in heavily trafficed areas. It was noted the 6" grasscrete forms would be available in 6 to 9 months Mr. Roger Griffin, 3238 McKinley, Santa Clara, asked how area would be watered. Mr. Presburger said irrigation from the roadway would flow into it. HC -188 , MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Page 10 policy tonight would apply Mr. Caughey advised any p y set to Phase Two and g P Phase Three. Mr. Presburger displayed a rendering of proposed lighting. The globe would be white. He described placement of lights. The Committee members felt if the applicant wanted to try some experi- menting with grasscrete in an area that does not have much visibility they could do so without coming back for approval. The hearing was opened to the public for comments. There were none. Public Hear- Member Claudy moved to close Public Hearings, seconded by Member Bond. ing closed Motion carried, 5-0 Member Claudy moved to recommend approval of Application HC -51,385.1 subject to standard H -Control conditions and additional conditions: (1) That approval is based upon Exhibits C-1 2nd Revision, C-4 2nd Revision, and E 1st Revision, except as modified by the additional conditions contained herein. (2) The applicant shall be permitted to substitute a stamped concrete (Bomanite) street paving material in those areas denoted on the approved exhibits and throughout the remainder of the project in areas originally designated for grasscrete. (3) The lighting plan as approved on Exhibit E 1st Revision shall be consistently applied throughout the remainder of the project area under Phase Two and Three and shall be subject to staff review and approval at the building permit stage. HC -51,385.1 Seconded by Member Bond. approved w/ conditions ! Motion carried, 5-0 Chairperson Sallan advised this application would be heard by the City Council on March 7, 1977. MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING 8. Application HC -51,398.1 - May Investment Company requesting approval of site, architecture, landscaping and grading for a four unit planned residential development located easter- ly of and adjacent to Terry Way at its southerly terminus. Staff member Caughey answered Chairperson Sallan that it was proper procedure for applicant to request approval from H -Control before having approval of tentative map, zoning and variance. Mr. Roger Griffin, 3238 McKinley, Santa Clara, answered Member Claudy that the owners could fence off the rear yard if they so desired. He pointed out there was a fence between the two duplexes. Mr. Martin L. Hall, 21060 Homestead Road, Cupertino, gave background of the site. He asked if the Committee would object to a wrought iron gate at courtyard. The Committee members were agreeable to this. Mr. Hall said the wall around the property would be painted and land- scaped. Slides were shown 9f the site and the surrounding property. Mr. Hall said an arbor would be built to provide privacy from Downey Savings with trees along the wall. It was noted the Liquidambar trees should be the same variety as the street trees. Final landscaping plan to be brought to staff. The hearing was opened to the public. There were no comments. Member Claudy moved to close Public Hearings, seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 5-0 Member Bond moved for approval of Application HC -51,398.1 with standard H -Control conditions and by the attached drawings modified to allow for wrought iron gates on front elevation at entrance way. Final landscape design to be brought in for staff review; intent is for provision of privacy at rear property line. Seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 5-0 Chairperson Sallan advised this application would go before City Council on March 7, 1977. HC -188 Page 11 HC -51,398.1 May Invest- ment Company Public Hear- ings closed HC -51,398.1 approved w/ conditions HC -188 MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Page 12 9. Application HC -51,402.2 - Great Western Savings and Loan Association (Terranomics Development Corporation) request- ing approval of site, architecture, landscaping, grading, lighting and signing for a savings and loan facility located at the southeast quadrant of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Portal Avenue. Mr. Melvin C. Royke, AIA architect, said the building was intended to relate to other buildings of the center. Samples of materials were displayed. Mr. Royke said it was the same color but not the same, texture as other buildings in the center. Member Irvine stressed the colors should match. With regard to concerns noted in staff memo of February 17, 1977, relative to landscaping, Mr. Royke described the landscaping planned. He said the perimeter landscaping would be done by Michael Painter and Associates, landscape architects for the Terranomics project. Member Claudy questioned the trailing jasmine's ability to grow in total shade. He pointed out there would be no direct sun on the planters. Mr. Royke said there would be no visible lights. He pointed out location of "wall wash" lights. Mr. Royke showed samples of their sign colors, white face with blue metal channel. It was ascertained there would be two signs and three logos. Chairperson Sallan pointed out the sign criteria for minor tenants in the center required white face copy with brick red returns and gold trim. She also advised that under the draft Sign Ordinance only two signs would be allowed for the building. Mr. Royke said they were not minor tenants. This was discussed. i Chairperson Sallan felt the 20" letters would be large. Member Bond said he felt there should be one sign and logo, two signs or two logos. Member Claudy suggested perhaps they could make an exception for having two signs and one logo. After further discussion, the applicant said they would rather have two signs and would drop the logos. The hearing was opened for public comments. There were none. MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING HC -188 Page 13 Member Bond moved to close Publ-ic Hearings, seconded by Member Claudy. Motion carried, 5-0 Member Irvine moved to approve Application HC -51,402.2, Great Western Savings and Loan Association, with standard H -Control conditions and following conditions: (1) That the exterior,wood fascia, tile, etc. match what has been approved in previous Terranomics application. (2) Three logos be deleted from the application. (3) Lighting intensity to be subject to committee and staff review. Seconded by Member Bond. Motion carried, 5-0 Chairperson Sallan announced the application would now be heard by the City Council at its March 7, 1977 meeting. At 10:47 p.m. a recess was called, with the meeting reconvening at 10:55 p.m. 10. Application HC -51,150.2 - De Anza Racquet Club requesting approval of modification of site, architecture and land- scaping for a commercial racquet club located at the north- west corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road. Staff member Caughey referred to staff memo of February 17, 1977, noting concern was public perception of the building mass from Stevens Creek Boulevard, particularly the south elevation. Mr. Caughey called attention to the trellis approach as a bus shelter at the end of the covered path of the building entrance. As clear policy for a shelter design has not been articulated by the City Council this proposal may have to be deferred until such policy direction is given. Mr. Milton Goes, 2180 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, said the structure was 27 ft. From top of mound on Stevens Creek Boulevard to building was 11 ft. Public Hear- ings closed HC -51,402 .2 approved w/ conditions HC -51,150.2 De Anza Racquet Club HC -188 MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Page 14 A model of the building was displayed. Mr. Goes described how they had designed to be compatible with De Anza College. Member Irvine felt it was the vertical elements on the east elevation that was a concern. Mr. Goes described proposed bus stop, and said the trellis would break up vertical line. Mr. Goes answered Member Irvine that the trellis would be seen above the fence. Mr. Goes described the playing areas off the men's lounge. In discussing the bus stop, Member Irvine felt the bus stop should tie in with individual architecture rather than having a standard design. Chairperson Sallan said she felt this should be avoided and what would happen unless a standard was set. Mr. Goes pointed out sign that would say "bus stop", noting benches would also be provided. Chairperson Sallan felt more research should be done on the question of bus stop designs. Member Irvine ascertained the restaurant had been eliminated. Mr. Keith Pritchard, 525 W. Remington Dr., Sunnyvale, said a number of restaurants had been explored, but economics did not make it feasible. Samples of materials were displayed and slides shown of buildings which had utilized this material. Landscaping was briefly discussed. Final landscaping plan to be brought to staff for approval. With regard to signing, Mr. Goes said they would rather have the build- ing be their sign. They would come in later for sign approval. He pointed to sign on model as being generally what they would propose. The Committee members agreed the proposal was acceptable in concept. The hearings were then opened for public comment. There were none. Public Hear- Member Claudy moved to close Public Hearings, seconded by Member Irvine. ings closed Motion carried, 5-0 MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING Member Ripplinger moved to approve Application HC -51,150.2, De Anza Racquet Club's application for modification of site and architecture, standard H -Control conditions, continuing the signing portion of this application to a later date at applicant's convenience. Landscaping on south elevation to be submitted for staff approval. Seconded by Member Bond. Motion carried, 5-0 Further discussion was held on the bus stop issue. Member Claudy felt the bus stops should tie in with architecture of the building; Member Bond agreed. Mr. Caughey said the issue would be noted in referrals to City Council. Chairperson Sallan advised the application had been approved with the exception of signing and would go before the City Council on March 7, 1977. Items 3 (Application HC -51,341.4), 6 (Application HC -51,380.1) and 11 (Application HC -51,158.3) were continued to H -Control meeting of March 10, 1977. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: 12. Application HC -51,387.1 - Kenneth P. Elvin: Informal review of architectural modifications. Since the applicant was not present and the Committee members had several questions, it was decided to continue this application to the next meeting also. The issue of bus stop design was briefly discussed again. Mr. Caughey said he had been in contact with transit department and would have input to present at next meeting. Member Claudy noted he did not have scales for use on plans and asked that the City provide them for use by the Committee members. Member Claudy noted there should be some way of assuring the landscaping is maintained. Means of enforcing maintenance was discussed. Staff is to investigate and report back to the Committee on ways this can be enforced. HC -188 Page 15 HC -51,150.2 approved wl conditions Items 3, 6 and 11 continued to 3/10/77 HC -51,387.1 continued to 3/10/77 HC -188 MINUTES OF THE FEBRUARY 24, 1977 H —CONTROL MEETING Page 16 Chairperson Sallan suggested using both sides of the paper in the staff memos. INTER COMMISSION NOTES: None ADJOURNMENT: At 11:42 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to 7:00 p.m. on March 10, 1977. APPROVED: Is/ C. Nancy Sallan Chairwoman ATTEST: Is/ Wm. E. Ryder City Clerk