HomeMy WebLinkAboutASAC Minutes - 05-05-1977CITY OF CUPERTINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014
Telephone: 252-4505
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE
HELD ON MAY 5, 1977, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER, CITY HALL
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
SALUTE TO THE FLAG
Ch. Sallan called the meeting to order at 7:06 PM with the Salute
to the Flag.
ROLL CALL
Members present: Claudy, Ripplinger, Ch. Sallan
Members absent: Bond, Irvine
Staff present: Senior Planning Technician Mark Caughey
Deputy City Clerk Ellen Pagnini
Noting that two Members were absent, Ch. Sallan announced to the
applicants that they were welcome to postpone their hearing until
the full complement of the Committee is present. Ch. Sallan also
announced that it was imperative that she leave the meeting at
11 PM, which would mean there would not be a quorum if the meeting
should run later than that.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS: Postponed.
INFORMAL REVIEW OF PLANNED DEVELOPM tT USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS:
8-U-77 San Jose Building Design, Inc.: Construction of
20 single-family cluster homes and four commercial
buildings located at the northwest corner of the
intersection of Foothill Blvd. and Stevens Creek Blvd,
HC -193
Page 1
The Senior Planning Technician stated 8-U-77 has been removed from
the agenda.
HC -193
Page 2
MINUTES OF MAY 5, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING
9-U-77 Starcrest Investors, Inc.: Construction of 11,625
sq. ft. of commercial and recreational/entertainment
space located at the southeast corner of the inter-
section of Homestead Road and Stelling Road.
The Senior Planning Technician placed the plans on the bulletin board
for perusal by the Committee.
After an informal review, Ch. Sallan recapped that the Members who were
present basically supported the staff's contention that employee parking
should be on the east side to minimize the traffic through the residential
area. Ramps and designated parking stalls should be, implemented for use
by the handicapped people.
11-U-77 Sobrato-Berg Properties:
234,000 sq. ft. of light
located at the southeast
North De Anza Blvd.
Construction of approximately
industrial building space
quadrant of Mariani Avenue and
Mr. John Sobrato reviewed his conceptual and preliminary plans with the
Committee. He was the first to admit that this is a very large develop-
ment. He said they are making every effort to minimize its effect on
the established area.
Comm. Ripplinger questioned why the City allowed such a development to
take place when we have an insufficient water supply.
Mr. Sobrato said he is somewhat concerned about the adjacent residential,
so they have gone to single story building in that area. The morning of
this meeting he was able to purchase some more trip ends so the building
in the front will have three stories instead of two. They have changed
the front parking lot to the Drachman System (compact and standard size
spaces). He stressed that they are saving every tree on the property.
The rendering showed the mature trees drawn to scale and the site plan
shows the actual drip line of the trees. He cautioned, however, that if
another tenant comes in and wants another configuration for the front
portion (not within the scope of 9-U-77), this may have to change.
Present negotiations are with Syva Company in Stanford Industrial Park.
The conceptual plan for the front portion shows 104,000 sq. ft. of building.
Ch. Sallan said she is very much in favor of the conceptual plan which
saves all the trees. She is concerned that there is the possibility
that this may not reach fruition.
The building exteriors were discussed next. There will be quite a bit
of brick used. The cap on the 18' high buildings will be 7 to 8'.
Member Claudy said people have told him they don't like that huge strip
of white around the Zilog building. Mr. Sobrato said he has been
congratulated about the design of that building.
MINUTES OF MAY 5, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING
Mr. Sobrato felt the main concern with the residents in the area
of the Zilog building is the placement of the building.
Member Claudy asked about the loading dock for this proposal.
Mr. Sobrato said the main loading dock, located in the northeast
corner, will be depressed. There will also have to be some
secondary docks.
The Senior Planning Technician said the City is still awaiting
comments from the School District about this proposal. The City's
sound expert said that by keeping the landscaping space next
to the wall narrow and landscaping along the building, the noise
attenuation will be kept down.
Ch. Sallan felt that the 5' wide perimeter landscaping would be
a bit tight. Mr. Sobratto offered to move the front building
somewhat and narrow down the courtyards. Ch. Sallan suggested he
check with a landscape architect to see if adding 2 feet to the
width would do any good as far as the plantings are concerned..
Mr. Sobrato said the two courtyards consist of 1.5 acres• The
development is so large that by looking at the plans it is hard
to imagine the courtyards will be that large.
Ch. Sallan recapped: 1) There should be an increase in the
perimeter planting along the southerly and easterly borders of
the property. 2) The building configuration is acceptable to
the Committee; another configuration which eliminates the stand
of pepper trees would not necessarily be acceptable. 3) The
landscaping is needed most on the southerly property line because
it will be seen more readily there.
ADMINISTRATION OF OATH OF OFFICE
Deputy City Clerk Ellen Pagnini administered the Oath of Office to
Ch. Sallan and Member Ripplinger. Since Member Irwin was absent,
his Oath of Office will be administered at the next meeting.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes of Regular Meeting of April 21, 1977.
Page 5, paragraph 6, line 4: Delete "setting" and replace with
"taking place 50 feet from Wolfe Road."
Page 10, paragraph 2, line 1: Add "de facto" before "sign program'
HC -193
Page 3
HC -193
Page 4
MINUTES OF MAY 5, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING
Moved by Member Claudy, seconded by Member Ripplinger, to approve the
Minutes of April 21, 1977 as amended.
Motion carried, 3-0
POSTPONEMENTS; None.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS;
IThe Senior Planning Technician said Mr. James J. Garber was present to
lidiscuss his proposed development at the corner of Alpine Drive and Salem
;Avenue.
'Mr. Garber answered Ch. Sallan that the color of the exterior will be
grey stain which will go with the charcoal redwood shake mansard roof.
It will be compatible with others in the neighborhood. After a brief
;discussion, Ch. Sallan said the Committee had no problem with this
,proposal.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. Application HC -51,220.1 - Beekman Place Homeowners Association
requesting approval of architecture and landscaping to construct
a fence to enclose the common areas in Beekman Place, located on
the east side of Blaney Avenue.
:Member Claudy commented that he is concerned that the City of Cupertino
is becoming a City within walls.
:Colored slides were shown of the development.
Mr, Lindsey Shears, President of the Beekman Place Homeowners Association,
said they engaged an architect who advised a 6' high stucco fence that
would tie in with the materials used on the homes. Mr. Shears said the
parks are paid for and maintained by the homeowners. They now have a
plague of traffic through their common areas, particularly from school -age
:residents of the nearby apartment complex. They have bicycles, dune
buggies, motorcycles and dogs. He said they are asking permission to
:build fences on their own property. The fences will match fences on
both sides of them.
'The Senior Planning Technician answered `'ember Ripplinger that the common
areas belong to the homeowners.
Member Claudy clarified that the prime reason is to cut down on traffic
through the common areas.
MINUTES OF MAY 5, 1977 H -CONTROL 1 ETING
Mr. Shears answered Ch. Sallan that they would be willing to
place shrubbery along the front of the fence if this is approved.
It could be difficult to maintain and water, however.
Member Claudy was not in favor of this proposal, although he
sympathized with the privacy problem. He believes the same
objective could be accomplished with a nice wrought iron fence.
If the Committee approved this wall, he would me more concerned
about the landscaping outside the wall than inside.
Ch. Sallan asked the applicant if the homeowners would consider
some other type structure that would retain the view corridor.
When it became apparent this is what the Committee would agree to,
Mr. Shears opted for a continuance so he could check into it.
HC -193
Page 5
Since there were no comments from the audience, it was moved by HC -51,220.1
Comm. Claudy, seconded by Comm. Ripplinger to continue application; continued
HC -51,220.1 to sometime in the future, when the applicant is
ready to come back.
Motion carried, 3-0
2. Application HC -51,374.2 - Self Sery Food Corporation (Burger
Pit) requesting approval of site, architecture and landscaping
for the remodeling of an existing restaurant located at the
southwest corner of Stevens Creek Blvd. and Blaney Avenue.
Colored slides of the site were shown. The Senior Planning
Technician said the proposal is to extend the screen and to
screen the screen. He referred to details contained in the
April 29, 1977 staff report. The Traffic Engineer suggested
eliminating the easterlymost parking stall and shifting all the
stalls to the west and restriping them to 9.5' minimum width.
Reciprocal driveway easements should be required of this applicant;
and of adjacent Night Kap and Westridge Florist whenever they comei
to the City for something.
Mr. Frank Hopkins, President of Self Sery Food Corporation, said
the problems here have been the roof apptrtenances. Burger Pit
has been at this location for many years. They have dedicated
15' on Stevens Creek Blvd and 10' on Blaney Avenue, which reduced
the size of the site considerably, The shopping center next door
has inadequate parking so their clients use Burger Pit's parking
stalls. Night Kap customers also use their parking stalls.
HC -193
Page 6
MINUTES OF MAY 5, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING
Mr. Hopkins said the equipment will be moved off the roof and placed on
the ground except for one exhaust fan and one other piece of equipment
that will be screened. He questioned the advisability of reducing the
10' sidewalk on Stevens Creek Blvd. to 5'. Ch. Sallan said the City
is very much interested in reducing the width of this sidewalk in order
to increase the parking. Gemco has reduced their sidewalks to 5'.
Mr. Hopkins said it would be a hardship to reduce his 32 parking spaces
to 30. The ideal would have been for them to purchace the land behind
them, but that is impossible. He said there are some posts along
Blaney Avenue which will make a 5t sidewalk somewhat of a problem.
Member Claudy said the Ordinance says th&parking spaces must be 9.5'
wide, so only 13 spaces will fit in the back parking lot. Another
concern of his is that there are no spaces marked for the handicapped.
He suggested the stalls designated for the handicapped be made
slightly wider. The applicant agreed to this.
The Senior Planning Technician answered Ch. Sallan that there are not
enough parking spaces involved here to allow the Drachman System.
Member Ripplinger asked if the driveway is too wide here. The Senior
Planning Technician said the minimum ingress/egress is 32'; maximum
is 40'.
The applicant agreed to the choice of plants listed in the staff report.
He would like to avoid the reduction of sidewalk width, if possible.
He would prefer to keep the Blaney Avenue driveway open.
Ch. Sallan answered the applicant that he will have to post a bond for
the landscaping until the drought is over. Member Ripplinger said he
would hate to see the sidewalk width reduced right away and have to
have 5' of dirt there until the end of the drought. Until such time as
the City Council rescinds that policy, that area could remain status quo.
The applicant would really like to retain the 32 parking spaces.
The Committee decided that if there is a technical problem with the
air conditioning equipment it could be resolved at staff level.
The Committee would like to see 5' more landscaping, but not 5' of dirt
until the end of the drought. The amount of the bond would be based
upon what it would cost the City to go in and do the job if it became
necessary.
Since there were no comments from the audience, it was moved by
Member Ripplinger, seconded by Member Claudy to close the public hearing.
Motion carried, 3-0
MINUTES OF MAY 5, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING
Moved by Member Claudy, seconded by Member Ripplinger to approve
application HC -51,374.2, based on the staff's Information Exhibit
B, subject to the standard H -Control conditions with the following
further conditions:
1-8. Architectural and Site Approval Standard Conditions to the
extent that they do not conflict with the special conditions
enumerated herein. In the event a conflict does exist, the
special conditions as enumerated herein shall apply.
9. That the recommendation of approval is based on Exhibit B and
staff information, of this application except as may be
amended by special conditions contained herein.,
10. Parking stalls 19-32 shall be shifted westerly and restriped
to City standard specifications as per staff exhibit.
11. All conditions of approval contained in ASAC Resolution 589
adopted January 22, 1976 shall be binding upon the applicant
particularly conditions 8, 9, 10 and 11 of said Resolution.
12. The sidewalk shown on Exhibit B adjacent to Stevens Creek
Blvd. shall be reduced in width to 51. The sidewalk shall
remain adjacent to curb line and the remaining 5' wide area
shall be landscaped and maintained by the owner of the
subject property at such time as the drought is ended. This
condition shall not be enforced until such time. Final con-
figuration of all public sidewalk areas shall be subject to
approval of the Director of Public Works.
13. Screening devices for roof -mounted mechanical equipment shall
be constructed in a manner to minimize public view of said
equipment and still permit safe and efficient operation
thereof, subject to staff's approval.
14. The equipment area on Exhibit "B" at the south end of the
restaurant building shall be fully enclosed in a manner
subject to staff approval.
15. Landscaping approach is approved conceptually and the appro
priate planting materials are subject to later review.
Motion carried, 3-0
Ch. Sallan noted the site and landscaping will be discussed in
depth at the ;May 19th meeting, or later.
HC -193
Page 7
HC -51,374.2
approved
Ch. Sallan called a recess at 9:00 PM. The meeting reconvened at
9:12 PM.
HC -193 I MINUTES OF MAY 5, 1977 , H -CONTROL MEETING
Page 8
3. Application HC -51,406.1 - Clayton T. Woods requesting approval of
site, architecture, landscaping and grading for five detached
single-family dwelling units located at the southwest corner of
Foothill Blvd. and Alcalde Road.
Mr. Clayton Woods stated he is the applicant and the architect.
Colored slides were shown of the site and of the developed duplex
and single family homes in the immediate area.
Mr. Woods said the major concern when designing this was to give privacy
to this R1C zone. This was originally zoned for duplexes. House 1
has the least amount of concern; the primary rooms ]gook out upon a
considerable amount of open space. House.2, in the middle of the property,
will have two Canary Island pines to provide good screening, particularly
from House 4. Each home has a certain portion of private yard. Wing
walls have been introduced to maximize privacy between Houses 4 and 3.
Lot 5 has more open space in the back yard and is about 75` from Lot 1.
Member Claudy would like to see addition of one more 15 -gallon tree
at the corner of Lot 4. The applicant readily agreed to this. He said
this type tree affords privacy from other homes, yet affords a view of
the foothills since it is narrow at the top. There will be grasscrete
in 2 parking spaces in lieu of asphalt. These 2 parking spaces are being
provided to satisfy the Ordinance, although the applicant feels they
will not be needed.
Basically the April 29, 1977 report by Edward L. Pack Associates, Inc.,
concerns the traffic situation on Foothill Blvd. This project will not
have the traffic of large trucks that is experienced at Stevens Creek
Blvd. and Foothill Blvd, but there is one quarry up near the dam and
there is the traffic going to the dam. There is a 48 db level, which
is 3 db above the maximum in Title 25. To mitigate this noise level
during suraner, windows can be closed and forced air turned on, or a
wall could be built along Foothill Blvd.
In reference to the architecture, the exterior will be redwood with
earth tone stains, shake roof, and redwood fence set back from the street.
Landscaping was discussed next. Mr. Woods agreed with the staff report
in that this is a neighborhood in transition. His initial feeling was
to keep the landscaping as natural as possible. He said there has been
a change in the Department of Public Works since he purchased this
property. They are now being required to widen Foothill Blvd, to put
in curbs, gutters, electroliers, sidewalks, etc. Through the use of
mounds, they plan to give a more visual separation from Foothill Blvd.
They have been required to add 2 more parking spaces in front of Unit 5
so grasscrete and turf ,rill be put in. He said 90% of the people prefer
to have a lawn.
MINUTES OF MAY 5, 1977 H -CONTROL MEETING ( HC -193
Page 9
Ch. Sallan said it would be a shame to give up the environment up
there. She believes the structures will fit in, but she does not
believe all that grass would be out of character.
Member Claudy lives next to the hills with no development behind
him. He has grass in the front yard, and he likes it.
Mr. Woods said he feels strongly that there should be lawns in the
fronts of these homes. This lawn area is common area.
The staff recommended willow trees. Mr. Woods would like somethin
the homeowners will like and will agree to maintain.,
Ch. Sallan asked for comments from the audience. There were none.
Moved by Member Claudy, seconded by Member Ripplinger, to close
the public hearing.
Motion carried, 3-0
Moved by Member Claudy, seconded by Member Ripplinger to approve HC -51,406.1
application HC -51,406.1, subject to the H -Control Standard approved
Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the
following special conditions:
1) Recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits A, B, 3-1 and
C of this application except as amended by special conditions
contained herein.
2) The wing wall shall be added on the rear of Units 2 and 4 to
mitigate visual privacy intrusion of back yards of adjacent
buildings.
3) A minimum of one Canary Island pine shall be added in the
southwest corner of the back yard of Building 4 to further
minimize visual intrusion.
4) Recommendations of the project sound study shall be imple-
mented to conform to the intent of Condition 19 of Planning
Commission Resolution No. 1643. These recommendations shall
be met by utilizing recommendation 1 on Page 2 of the Edwin
Pack Acoustical Report, Project No. 9043, dated April 29,
1977.
Motion carried, 3-0
The applicant was informed this will go to the City Council on
May 16, 1977.
HC -193
Page 10
MINUTES OF MAY 5, 1977, H -CONTROL MEETING
4. Application HC -51,002.16 - Jack Paulson requesting approval of site,
architecture, landscaping, grading and lighting for a four -unit
apartment complex on the east side of Alpine Drive.
Exhibit B-3 was distributed to the Committee Members by the Senior
Planning Technician. Colored slides of the site were shown. A sight
distance drawing was prepared by the adjacent single-family homeowner
downhill from this property.
There was a discussion of whether or not the wing walls should be
extended to 8 feet. The Committee felt that 5' would be sufficient.
The trash enclosure will be fully enclosed with a gate. The Committee
had no problems with the architecture.
Landscaping was discussed next. Ch. Sallan asked Mr. Paulson if he
would be willing to put cutouts at each of the vertical posts. He
agreed to this. Landscaping will be put into the cutouts.
Ch. Sallan asked for comments from the audience.
Mrs. Paula Keena stated she owns the property to the north of this.
They will be sharing the only common fence and would like to work
out something compatible for both property owners. She also stated
that parking on Alpine Drive is hazardous. She said she is happy
the upstairs window is opaque so there will be no privacy problem.
Mr. Bill Steiner said he lives in the house behind this property,
on Vista Knoll. He likes this plan as presented but wanted to bring
up some other points. He is not sure of the value of the wing walls.
He believes the people would rather have the morning sun and the view
and a little less privacy. As to the rear fence, he would like to
have a firm commitment for the 6' fence measurement to start from
pad level. Mr. Paulson was agreeable to this.
Mr. Paul Hardin, 10397 Vista Knoll, said it appears the owner has
attempted to develop something that is acceptable to the neighborhood.
After discussion of the landscaping, the applicant said he was
willing to put in shrubbery instead of the pinus contorta noted on
the plans.
Moved by Member Claudy, seconded by Member Ripplinger, to close the
public hearing.
Motion carried, 3-0
MINUTES OF MAY 5, 1977, H -CONTROL MEETING
The Committee decided it would be best to leave the wing wall at
4'. The plants along the front of the garage are to be left to
the staff's discretion.
Moved by Member Claudy, seconded by Member Ripplinger to reopen
the public hearing.
Motion carried, 3-0
The lighting was discussed next. The applicant proposed bullet
lights as exterior lights for the back patios. He wpuld also
like to put lights on the sides of the garage. He said that if
they are put in the planting areas they usually become damaged.
He agreed there could be brick planter boxes with lights in them.
Member Ripplinger said the applicant's proposal for putting the
lighting on the side of the garage will do the job nicely.
Member Claudy agreed, although he would prefer to see the low,
mushroom type lights. Ch. Sallan said this would be left to the
discretion of the staff.
Moved by Member Claudy, seconded by Member Ripplinger, to close
the Public Hearing.
Motion carried, 3-0
Moved by Member Ripplinger, seconded by Member Claudy to approve
application HC -51,002.16 with the standard H -Control conditions
with the following further conditions:
1) The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits A, A-i,
B, B-1, C and E.
2) The fence on the east property line of subject property shall
be constructed, relocated or otherwise adjusted to obtain a
line of sight angle from east elevation second story windows
equal to that achieved with an 8' high fence on the east pro-
perty line as per Exhibit A-1.
3) That the trash enclosure area will be fully enclosed and
screened with landscaping subject to staff approval.
4) That the patio lighting will be the fixtures in Exhibit E
and walkway lighting will be to staff approval.
5) Planting along the east fence line will be modified per the
applicant's option and brought back for staff approval.
6) On the west elevation of the garage there will be column -
type plants in cutouts at each of the garage partitions.
Motion carried, 3-0
HC -193
Page 11
HC -51,002.16
approved
HC -193
Page 12
MINUTES OF MAY 5, 1977, H -CONTROL MEETING
(UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There was a brief discussion of the Minutes of the last Public Safety
Commission meeting,
It was noted that at the last Council Meeting, Mayor Frolich instructed
the Code Enforcement Officer speak to the people at Zilog Corporation,
who never have their trash container inside the enclosure.
Member Claudy asked the Senior Planning Technician to check Section 25
of the California Code regarding mitigating noise on public streets.
He should also check on the requirements for the handicapped. A
standard condition should be developed which can be added to the H -Control
standard conditions. Ch. Sallan said that perhaps we are going in the
wrong direction with these walls separating the homes from major streets.
Ch. Sallan wanted to know where we stand on the water situation. She
is concerned that so many developments are going in with the landscaping
being delayed. Member Ripplinger said perhaps we should have a moratorium
on development until the emergency is over. It was pointed out that there
are ways of cutting down water usage and still keeping plants alive.
NEW BUSINESS
Since she would be unable to attend the next Mayor's Meeting, Ch. Sallan
appointed Member Claudy to represent the Committee at this meeting.
INTER COMMISSION NOTES: None
ADJOU RNMENT
Moved by Member Claudy, seconded by Member Ripplinger to adjourn this
meeting at 11:00 PM to 7:00 PM on May 19, 1977.
ATTEST:
Is/ Wm. E. Ryder
City Clerk
Motion carried, 3-0
APPROVED:
Is/ John Claudy
Chairman