HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 04-07-2026 Item No. 1 Active Transportation Plan_Supplemental ReportCC 4-07-2026
#1
Active Transportation Plan
Supplemental Report
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 • FAX: (408) 777-3333
CUPERTINO.GOV
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DESK ITEM
Meeting: April 07, 2026
Special Meeting Agenda Item # 1
Subject
An update on the development of the Active Transportation Plan, including a summary
of Phase 2, explanations of plan edits, revised scoring criteria, and next steps
Recommended Action
Receive an update on the development of the Active Transportation Plan and provide
feedback on the agenda packet attachments.
Staff’s responses to questions received are shown in italics.
Q1: Attachment C - Prioritized Project list: Priority / Line item 9 - Location should be
McClellan Undercrossing, and not Stevens Creek Undercrossing - based on all previous
communications and revisions this seems an error. Please can we correct this error.
Staff response: The name change was made to emphasize its location adjacent to Stevens Creek (the
creek itself) . However, due to its potential confusion with the Boulevard, staff can change the project
title back to the McClellan Road Undercrossing to reflect the roadway the undercrossing would travel
beneath.
Q2: Attachment G - Network Recommendation Maps - page 2 is showing existing and
recommended bike network - somehow Don Burnett bridge is missing, thereby missing
an important connector. Please can we correct this error.
Staff response: It is correct that the bridge is erroneously missing in Attachment G. Attachment I
contains the updated Existing and Recommended Bicycle Network Map.
Q3: On Feb. 18 the bicycle & pedestrian commission moved a motion unanimously to
"Eliminate 1.25 modifier by making balance in bicycle matrix to a negative score." The
purpose of this recommendation was to provide better transparency and eliminate the
current convoluted way of equalizing scores between bicycle and pedestrian projects
with a 1.25 modifier. It does not seem this has been taken into account with the materials
provided for the April 7 city council meeting. It is important to note, this
recommendation was driven by significant community input to consider the impact of
projects against existing infrastructure (i.e. eliminating vehicle lanes and/or parking) . I
am assuming this is an oversight that needs correction.
Staff response: The Council staff report includes the BPC’s recommendations for Council
consideration. Staff’s intent is to bring the same documents to the Council that were provided to and
reviewed by the Commissions. Following the Council meeting, staff will revise the Plan per the
direction given by Council.
Attachments Provided with Original Staff Report:
A. November 04, 2025, City Council Staff Report
B. Revised Project Prioritization Criteria
C. Draft Prioritized Project List
D. Revised Program and Policy Recommendations
E. Draft Project Impact Evaluation Guidelines
F. Draft Project Effectiveness Guidelines
G. Draft Network Recommendations Maps
H. Visual Glossary
Attachments Provided with Supplemental Report:
I. Existing and Recommended Bicycle Network Map