HomeMy WebLinkAboutASAC Reso 792iC-5l , 312.3
RESOLUTION NO. 792
OF THE ARCHITECTU AL AND SITE APPROVAL CO.,r.1IT--=
OF =HE CITY OF CUPE'RTIN0 RECO�r.ENI'T-;G APPROVAL _—
GR.aI) I` G FOR A SINGLE—FA�iILy pO-, — -N* A HI_-
SU3DIVISIO^".
JO
RO?_7 1 _r v: VNE R: James G. Valker
APP? -c-.'::: James G. Vaiker
ADDRESS: 7576 ?eac= 31ossom Drive, San Cosa, California 931.9
LOCAD_ON OF PROPERTY: Re - art Canyon
FINDINGS:
The Architectural and Site Approval Committee finds aS follows with respec=
to this application:
That the proposed gre
with gradins/buildins
Commission Resolution
CCNDI_ION of APPROVAL:
ding plan indicates satisfactory compliance
mor-ho!ogv standards contained in Planning
No. l6'9.
i-8, Architectural and Site Approval Standard Conditions to the extent that they
do not conflict with the special conditions enumerated herein. In the
event a conflict does exist, the special conditions as enumerated herein
shall apply.
9. That the recommendation of approval is based coor. Exhibits C and D of this
application except as may be amended by
P special conditions contained herein.
10. The subject grading plan is approved in concept; final approval of the
on -site grading work shall be subject to staff approval prior to issuance
of grading permits. Staff may refer any significant revision to the
conceptual grading plan to the Architectural and Site Approval Committee
for review prior to issuance of a grading permit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of ;larch, 1978, at the regular meeting of the
Architectural and Site Approval Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of
California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Committee i.embers: Irvine, Ripplinger, Sallan, Vice -Chairman Bond
NAYS: None
ABSTAINING: " " Ncne
ABSENT: " Chai `^an Claudy
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
�✓ �-4 Is/ H. Elliott Bond
'lark ugh /7 H. Elliott Bond, Vice-Chaian
Assistant P1-"..ner Architectural and Site Approval Committee