HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 03-03-2026 Item No. 11 FY 2026-2027 CIP and Five-Year Plan_Supplemental ReportCC 3-3-2026
#11
FY 2026-2027 CIP and
Five-year Plan
Supplemental Report
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 • FAX: (408) 777-3333
CUPERTINO.GOV
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
SUPPLEMENTAL 1
Meeting: March 3, 2026
Agenda Item # 11
Subject
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Capital Improvement Programs and Five-year Plan.
Recommended Action
Receive presentation and approve the Capital Improvement Programs Project
Prioritization process and the Fiscal Year 2026–2027 Capital Improvement Programs and
Five-Year Plan proposal.
Background:
During preparatory meetings with Council members, City Staff received a request to
add a project to the FY 26-27 Capital Improvement Programs (CIP) proposal related to
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-5732
TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354
CUPERTINO.GOV
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: March 3, 2026
Subject
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Capital Improvement Programs and Five-year Plan
Recommended Action
Receive presentation and approve the Capital Improvement Programs Project Prioritization
process and the Fiscal Year 2026–2027 Capital Improvement Programs and Five-Year Plan
proposal.
Executive Summary
As part of the City of Cupertino’s annual budget process, staff develops proposals for new
Capital Improvement Programs (CIP) projects for City Council review and feedback. This input
helps refine the proposed CIP before it is presented alongside the annual budget.
The Fiscal Year 2026–2027 (FY 26–27) CIP advances previously approved, strategically-aligned
projects and prioritizes safety through the repair and revitalization of existing infrastructure to
preserve City facilities.
Background
A CIP project enhances, restores, extends the useful life of, or adapts a City asset to a new or
different use. The Public Works CIP Division manages the planning, design, procurement, and
construction of CIP projects, including streets, sidewalks, storm drainage, buildings, parks, and
bicycle and pedestrian improvements. The Division ensures projects meet community
expectations and comply with applicable City and State standards, with public health and
safety as the top priority.
CIP projects are distinguished from maintenance, Special Projects, and City Work Program
(CWP) efforts by the need for professional design and/or project management services requiring
specialized expertise and documentation. While most CIP projects involve design and
construction, planning efforts—such as feasibility studies or technical analyses—may also
qualify when they require engineering or design services. These guidelines are applied based on
the specifics of each project.
Project Priorities
Project prioritization is used to guide funding decisions and resource scheduling. Staff
evaluates and ranks new project proposals using the criteria and process outlined in
Attachment A.
The highest priority is given to projects that require repair of existing facilities to address public
health and safety and to protect public and private property. Other factors, including available
funding and resources to complete a project, are then considered within the context of other
City goals. The FY 26-27 CIP Projects Prioritization Matrix is Attachment B.
Projects are proposed by stakeholders, reviewed for completeness and prioritized according to
the factors listed in the Prioritization Process (Attachment A). Proposed and existing projects
are reviewed in the context of fiscal responsibility and capacity to confirm that initiating and/or
continuing the project is the best course of action. Attachment B illustrates the prioritization of
the existing CIP projects, as well as projects proposed in past years that have not been funded.
The review of existing projects this year has resulted in a recommendation to retain all existing
projects and their current funding.
Project narratives for each of the newly proposed projects can be found in Attachment C. The
Mid-Year CIP Status report (Attachment D) contains information on the existing CIP projects.
Attachment E provides information about projects suggested in each of the City’s master plans.
As part of the adoption of the City’s Annual Budget, a thorough “Fiscal Year 2026–2027 Capital
Improvement Programs and Five-Year Plan proposal, and Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Annual
Report“ will be submitted.
Reasons for Recommendation and Available Options
Using the priorities outlined in Attachment A, the following list identifies projects proposed for
the FY 26-27 CIP:
TABLE 1: PROPOSED FY 26-27 CIP PROJECTS
Project name Project Description FY 26-27
Funding
INTERNAL
Funding
EXTERNAL
Funding
Citywide
Facilities
Condition
Assessment
(FCA)
Implementation
Implement “Priority 1”
recommendations identified
in the FCA reports. Ongoing
initiative due to the extent of
improvements needed
throughout City buildings.
$1,250,000 $1,250,000 $0
City Hall
Annex
10455 Torre Avenue facility
renovation to include the
City’s Emergency Operations
Center (EOC), and
workplace for use as interim
City Hall.
$5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0
BBF Golf
Course Pro
Shop
Renovation
Interior renovation to
improve functionality and
code compliance.
$120,000 $120,000 $0
Sports Center
Courts
Resurfacing
Resurfacing the courts to
provide safe and consistent
surfaces.
$210,000 $210,000 $0
SCB/SR 85 NB
Ramp
Intersection
improvements
Improve traffic conditions
for all users at this
intersection. Developer In-
Lieu fees funded.
$600,000 $0 $600,000
Memorial Park
Pickleball
Sound
Attenuation
Provide sound attenuation
and a new structurally
reinforced fence.
$150,000 $150,000 $0
subtotal $7,330,000 $6,730,000 $600,000
In spite of limited resources in the past year, the CIP Division has successfully completed five
projects and three additional projects as part of the Facilities Condition Assessment
Implementation (FCA) project. Projects completed in FY 25-26, or which are scheduled for
completion this year include:
• All-Inclusive Play Area & Adult-Assistive Bathroom Facility at Jollyman Park
• City Lighting LED improvements
• Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP)
• FCA: Senior Center Fire Alarm System Upgrade
• FCA: Quinlan Community Center Chiller replacement*
• FCA: Quinlan Community Center and Sports Center flat roofs replacements*
• Photovoltaic Systems Design and Installation project*
• Stevens Creek Blvd. Class IV Bikeway, Phase 2A*
*Project that is projected to be complete by July 2026
Staff anticipates that these projects will underspend their respective budgets by approximately
$2,150,000. These underspent funds will be returned to the Capital Reserve (or other
appropriate accounts based on the original source of any restricted funds). Public Works and
Finance staff work together as part of the year-end process to close out completed projects,
presenting this information as part of the first quarter report for the following fiscal year.
Five-Year CIP Plan
Building upon the five-year plans of previous years, as well as input from stakeholders, the
updated five-year CIP plan is included below. More detail and context will be provided in the
forthcoming “Fiscal Year 2026–2027 Capital Improvement Programs and Five-Year Plan
proposal, and Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Annual Report.”
//
TABLE 2: PROPOSED FY 26-27 CIP FIVE-YEAR PLAN PROJECTS
Project FY 26-27
Funding
Year 2
FY 27-28
Projected
Cost
Year 3
FY 28-29
Projected
Cost
Year 4
FY 29-30
Projected
Cost
Year 5
FY 30-31
Projected
Cost
City Hall Annex $5,000,000
BBF Golf Course
Pro Shop
Renovation
$120,000
Sports Center
Courts
Resurfacing
$210,000
SCB/SR 85 NB
ramp Intersection
improvements
$600,000
Memorial Park
Pickleball Sound
Attenuation
$150,000
Citywide FCA
Implementation
(Annually funded)
$1,250,000 $1,300,000
ADA
Improvements
(Annually funded)
$100,000 $110,000 $120,000 $125,000
Outfalls Repairs
(Annually funded)
$600,000 $300,000 $600,000 $600,000
BBF Golf
Renovation:
minimal repairs
$1,580,150
Park Shade
Structures (5)
$1,000,000 $500,000
totals $7,330,000 $2,000,000 $1,990,150 $1,720,000 $1,225,000
Table Notes:
1. Current annual CIP funding is budgeted at $2M/year. Proposed annual CIP funding that
exceeds $2M/year will require additional funds beyond the $2M annual funding being allocated
to the program. Where possible, staff will search for external funding to address funding requests
of more than $2M.
2. Project estimates may be refined prior to future requests for funding. Estimates of Escalation are
included.
In December 2025, City Council approved the scope and increased funding for the City Hall
Improvements project. In the December 16, 2025 staff report, the projected expenditures and
encumbrances (e.g. contracts) for the renovation project were distributed over the next five
fiscal years:
TABLE 3: CITY HALL IMPROVEMENTS PROJECTED SPENDING (12/16/25)
FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 totals
Projected
Expenditures
$793,824 $1,329,109 $7,704,743 $22,501,089 $22,042,269 $54,371,034
Projected
Encumbrances
$1,555,777
$3,824,198 $43,973,600 $5,017,464 $ 0 $54,371,034
Using those figures and considering the project’s currently approved funding of $3 million, the
five-year plan for that project aligns as indicated in the table below.
TABLE 4: CITY HALL IMPROVEMENTS FIVE-YEAR PLAN
Project/ Current
Funding
FY 26-27
Funding
Year 2
FY 27-28
Projected
Cost
Year 3
FY 28-29
Projected
Cost
Year 4
FY 29-30
Projected
Cost
Year 5
FY 30-31
Projected
Cost
City Hall
$3,000,000*
$0 $46,353,570 $5,017,464 $0 $0
*The funding available for the City Hall project before FY25-26 was $500,000 and an additional
$2,500,000 was approved in December 2025 for a total of $3,000,000. Years 2-5 have yet to be
approved.
Going forward, funding for the City Hall project is expected to be drawn primarily from the
Future Use Fund, as discussed in December 2025. For clarity, the project is shown here as a
separate line item; however, Years 2–5 are anticipated to have significant impacts on the CIP,
both financially and in terms of staffing resources.
In summary, the FY 26-27 CIP proposal reflects two major projects previously approved by City
Council, along with long-deferred improvements to existing City facilities. The proposed five-
year plan prioritizes rehabilitation of aging infrastructure, investments that extend asset life
cycles, and capital improvements that support public health, safety, and overall community
well-being.
Sustainability Impact
Future projects will be evaluated for sustainability impacts as they are developed.
//
//
//
Fiscal Impact
The FY 26-27 proposal for CIP’s new and annually funded projects will require an allocation of
$6,730,000 from Capital Reserve and General Fund, and $600,000 from Developer In-Lieu fees
previously collected. The annual transfer from the General Fund is planned at $2,000,000. The
remaining $4,730,000 can be accommodated by the Capital Reserve.
Fund/Description Amount
FY26-27 CIP proposal $7,330,000
FY26-27 Developer In-Lieu funds ($600,000)
City Funds requested $6,730,000
General Fund Annual Transfer to CIP ($2,000,000)
Capital Reserve Required $4,730,000
Capital Reserve Accounting Amount
Capital Reserve (2/21/26) $10,243,497
Capital Reserve Required $4,730,000
Required Minimum Reserve maintained $5,000,000
Capital Reserve Available (beyond min.) $513,497
City Work Program (CWP) Item/Description:
None
Council Goal:
Quality of Life
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
No California Environmental Quality Act impact.
_____________________________________
Prepared by: Susan Michael, CIP Manager
Reviewed by: Chad Mosley, Director of Public Works
Approved for Submission by: Tina Kapoor, City Manager
Attachments:
A – CIP projects Prioritization Process
B – FY 26-27 CIP projects Prioritization Matrix
C – FY 26-27 CIP New Project Narratives
D – Mid-Year CIP status report
E – Master Plans Project Lists
CIP Prioritization process Page 1 of 9
Attachment A
CIP Prioritization
Process
Attachments:
Appendix A - Scoring Descriptions
Appendix B – Project Information and Scoring
Worksheet
Appendix C – Prioritization Matrix Template
Effective Date: March 3, 2026 Responsible Department: Public Works
Related Policies & Notes: CIP Policy Revised: 3/01/26
Purpose
This Capital Improvement Program (CIP) prioritization process is designed to help the City of
Cupertino transparently, consistently, and defensibly rank capital projects across departments. The
framework balances safety, regulatory compliance, fiscal responsibility, community benefit, and
City Council strategic priorities, while remaining flexible enough to adapt to changing conditions.
Guiding Principles
All CIP prioritization should be:
• Transparent – Clear criteria and scoring that can be explained to decision makers and the
public
• Equitable – Considers community-wide benefit and underserved populations
• Data Driven – Based on measurable impacts where possible
• Strategically Aligned – Supports adopted plans, policies, and Council goals
• Financially Responsible – Accounts for lifecycle cost and funding availability
Step-by-Step Prioritization Process
Step 1: Project Intake & Eligibility Screening
Departments submit proposed CIP projects using a standardized form. Projects must:
• Be a capital asset or extend the useful life of an existing asset
• Meet minimum cost and useful-life thresholds
• Be consistent with adopted plans (General Plan, Master Plans, Climate Action Plan, etc.)
Projects that are strictly operational, duplicative, or infeasible are screened out.
Step 2: Baseline Classification – Information gathering (Non-Scored)
Each project is tagged for reporting and tie-breaking purposes:
• Asset/Project Type (Transportation, Parks, Facilities, etc.)
• Project Category (New, Rehabilitation, Replacement, Expansion)
• Mandated vs. Discretionary
• Geographic Location / Service Area
CIP Prioritization process Page 2 of 9
Step 3: Scoring Using the CIP Prioritization Matrix
Projects are scored using the matrix below and the Worksheet in Appendix B. Each criterion is
scored on a 0–5 scale and multiplied by its assigned weight.
Step 4: Scoring Review & Calibration
• Scores are initially assigned by staff subject-matter experts
• Cross-departmental review ensures consistency
• Outliers or tied scores are reviewed and adjusted if justified
Step 5: Draft CIP Ranking & Financial Constraint
Projects are ranked by total score and then evaluated against:
• Available funding by fund type
• Debt capacity and cash flow
• Staffing and delivery capacity
Lower-ranked projects may advance if they are fully grant-funded or time-sensitive.
Step 6: Policy Review & Council Consideration
City Council may:
• Adjust rankings based on policy direction
• Group projects into tiers (Tier 1: Fund Now, Tier 2: Fund if Available, Tier 3: Unfunded)
• Direct staff to return with alternatives or phasing options
Any deviations from the scoring results should be documented for transparency.
Step 7: Annual Update & Continuous Improvement
• Scores are refreshed annually as conditions, costs, or regulations change
• Completed or cancelled projects are removed
• Criteria and weights are reviewed every 2–3 years. Projects scoring under 250 will be
removed in the following year.
CIP Prioritization Matrix
This adjusted weighting reflects Cupertino priorities including climate resilience, safety, and
fiscal responsibility, while preserving core safety and compliance requirements.
Table 1: CIP Prioritization Matrix Scoring Guidance
Category Weight Description Scoring Guidance
(0–5)
1. Health & Safety 30%
Improves public safety,
emergency response, and safety
for all transportation users
0 = No safety impact;
5 = Critical safety risk
if not addressed
2. Regulatory / Legal
Mandate 15%
Required to meet federal, state,
or local regulations, permits, or
legal agreements
0 = Not required; 5 =
Legally mandated
with deadlines or
penalties
CIP Prioritization process Page 3 of 9
3. Asset Condition &
Infrastructure Risk 15%
Addresses failing or near-end-
of-life physical or digital
infrastructure
0 = Good condition; 5
= Failure imminent or
service disruption
likely
4. Climate Resilience
& Sustainability 5%
Reduces greenhouse gas
emissions, improves energy
efficiency, or enhances resilience
to heat, drought, flooding, or
power outages
0 = No climate
benefit; 5 =
Significant emissions
reduction and
resilience benefit
5. Strategic Alignment 10%
Advances City Council goals,
General Plan, Climate Action
Plan, or adopted Master Plans
0 = No alignment; 5 =
Explicitly identified
priority project
6. Community Benefit
& Equity 5%
Improves access, quality of life,
or services, including benefits to
underserved populations
0 = Minimal benefit; 5
= Broad and
equitable community
benefit
7. Financial Leverage
& Cost Effectiveness 15%
Maximizes grants, partnerships,
lifecycle savings, or operational
efficiencies
0 = No leverage; 5 =
Majority funded
externally or major
long-term savings
8. Project Readiness &
Deliverability 5%
Level of design, environmental
clearance, and ability to deliver
within the CIP window
0 = Concept only; 5 =
Shovel-ready
CIP Prioritization process Page 4 of 9
Appendix A - Scoring Descriptions
Refer to the descriptions below to ensure consistent scoring. Scores should be evidence-based
and documented in the worksheet notes.
1. Health and Safety (Weight: 30)
Focus: Risk to public or staff if the project is delayed.
• 0 – No identifiable safety benefit
• 1 – Minor safety improvement; low risk
• 2 – Addresses isolated or infrequent safety concerns
• 3 – Reduces known safety issues; moderate risk exposure
• 4 – Addresses serious safety hazards or near-miss history
• 5 – Critical safety risk; high likelihood of injury or emergency response failure if not
addressed
2. Regulatory / Legal Mandate (Weight: 15)
Focus: Compliance with laws, permits, or binding agreements.
• 0 – No regulatory or legal requirement
• 1 – Indirectly supports compliance
• 2 – Anticipated future regulation
• 3 – Required to maintain compliance; no immediate deadline
• 4 – Required with a defined deadline or enforcement risk
• 5 – Legally mandated with penalties, consent decree, or active enforcement
3. Asset Condition & Infrastructure Risk (Weight: 15)
Focus: Current condition and likelihood of failure.
• 0 – Asset in good condition; no issues
• 1 – Minor wear; routine maintenance sufficient
• 2 – Moderate deterioration
• 3 – Poor condition; increasing maintenance or service impacts
• 4 – Near end-of-life; high risk of failure
• 5 – Failure imminent or already occurring
4. Climate Resilience & Sustainability (Weight: 5)
Focus: Climate action, resilience, and long-term environmental performance.
• 0 – No climate or sustainability benefit
• 1 – Minor efficiency improvement
• 2 – Small emissions reduction or resilience improvement
• 3 – Meaningful sustainability benefit aligned with Climate Action Plan
• 4 – Significant emissions reduction and/or resilience improvement
• 5 – Transformational climate or resilience benefit; flagship sustainability project
CIP Prioritization process Page 5 of 9
5. Strategic Alignment (Weight: 10)
Focus: Consistency with adopted City priorities and policy direction.
• 0 – No alignment with adopted plans or Council goals
• 1 – Indirect or minimal alignment
• 2 – Supports one minor objective or policy
• 3 – Directly advances one major Council goal or adopted plan
• 4 – Advances multiple adopted goals, plans, or initiatives
• 5 – Explicitly identified or prioritized in adopted plans or formal Council direction
6. Community Benefit & Equity (Weight: 5)
Focus: Breadth and fairness of benefits.
• 0 – Minimal or internal benefit only
• 1 – Limited benefit to a small group
• 2 – Localized benefit to one neighborhood or user group
• 3 – Noticeable benefit to a significant portion of the community
• 4 – Broad community benefit with improved access or quality of life
• 5 – Citywide benefit and/or directly addresses equity or underserved populations
7. Financial Leverage & Cost Effectiveness (Weight: 15)
Focus: Maximizing value of City funds.
• 0 – No cost savings or outside funding
• 1 – Minor operational efficiencies
• 2 – Some lifecycle cost avoidance
• 3 – Moderate cost savings or partial grant funding
• 4 – Significant outside funding or strong lifecycle savings
• 5 – Majority funded by grants/partners or substantial long-term savings
8. Project Readiness & Deliverability (Weight: 5)
Focus: Ability to deliver within the CIP timeframe.
• 0 – Concept only; no scope definition
• 1 – Preliminary idea; major unknowns
• 2 – Scope defined; early feasibility work
• 3 – Preliminary design or environmental review underway
• 4 – Design substantially complete; permits in progress
• 5 – Shovel-ready; environmental clearance and design complete
CIP Prioritization process Page 6 of 9
Appendix B – Project Information and Scoring Worksheet
Red text signifies areas that require information from the applicant[s].
PROJECT TITLE page 1
Proposed FY26-27 City Funding $ 110,000
Total Funding $ 970,000
City Funding FY26-27 $ 110,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 191,990
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan 2015 ADA Transition Plan
Project Category Facilities, Parks, Streets
and Infrastructure,
Transportation, OR
Sustainability
Project Type Design and Construction
Origin of Request Public Works
FY Initiated FY 2015-16
Project Description
Insert project description here (75 words or less).
Project Justification
Insert project justification here. (Include references to Master Plan, General Plan, or other Strategic Plans).
Prioritization (score 1 to 5. See prioritization matrix notes)
Health & Safety 1 Provide substantiation notes for each category
Regulatory / Legal Mandate 0
Asset Condition & Infrastructure Risk 3
Climate Resilience & Sustainability 1
Strategic Alignment 4
Community Benefit & Equity 3
Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
3
Project Readiness 3
CIP Prioritization process Page 7 of 9
PROJECT TITLE page 2
Operating Budget Impacts
Describe how this project impacts operational costs including maintenance contracts, processes, materials, and staffing
requirements. Provide any costs and/or estimates available.
Funding Information
Note any external funding available. If external funding is a good possibility in the future, that can also be noted.
External Funding
FY 26-27 FY 27-28 FY 28-29 FY 29-30 FY 30-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0
Expenditure Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Annual Expenditures (GL#) FY 25-26
Actual
FY 26-27
Projected
FY 27-28
Projected
FY 28-29
Projected
FY 29-30
Projected
FY 30-31
Projected
T.B.D. N.A. $ 100,000 $ 110,000 $ 115,000 $ 120,000 $ 125,000
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
This is an ongoing program, funded annually, to improve accessibility at all public facilities throughout the City.
Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation July 2026
Consultant Procurement Ongoing
Planning/Pre-Design Ongoing
Design Ongoing
Permitting & Environmental Clearance Ongoing
Construction Bid Ongoing
Contract Award and Contracting Ongoing
Construction Ongoing
Post-Construction/Close-out Ongoing
Project Location
Address
(Add any information or graphic that you
can share)
CIP Prioritization process Page 8 of 9
APPENDIX C
PRIORITIZATION MATRIX TEMPLATE - FY 26-27 CIP PROJECTS
CIP Prioritization process Page 9 of 9
APPENDIX C
PRIORITIZATION MATRIX TEMPLATE - FY 26-27 CIP PROJECTS
(Page 2)
APPENDIX B
PRIORITIZATION MATRIX - FY 26-27 CIP PROJECTS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Totals
LEGEND:
Facilities
Parks
Streets & Infrastructure
Transportation
Sustainability
Health & Safety Regulatory /
Legal Mandate
Asset
Condition &
Infrastructure
Risk
Climate
Resilience &
Sustainability
Strategic
Alignment
Community
Benefit &
Equity
Financial
Leverage &
Cost
Effectiveness
Project
Readiness
Points
Range: 0
to 500
30 15 15 5 10 5 15 5 100
ACTIVE PROJECTS
City Hall Improvements 5 3 5 4 5 3 3 2 410
City Hall Annex 5 3 3 3 5 5 3 5 400
ADA Improvements 4 5 3 1 5 5 3 3 380
McClellan Road Bridge
Replacement
5 3 4 1 2 3 5 2 380
Stevens Creek Bridge Repair 5 3 4 1 2 3 5 2 380
Citywide Building Condition
Assessment Implementation
4 3 4 4 3 2 4 2 355
Outfalls Repairs [Storm Drains] 4 3 4 1 2 3 2 2 305
Vai Avenue Outfall 4 3 4 1 2 3 2 2 305
EVCS expansion - Service Center 1 5 1 4 5 2 5 5 300
Tamien Innu - East Segment 3 1 1 4 5 2 5 5 300
MRP West Parking Lot
Improvements
0 5 1 5 5 5 5 5 290
Roadway Safety Improvements -
HSIP
4 1 1 2 2 2 5 5 290
Lawrence-Mitty Park and Trail
Plan
2 1 2 5 5 5 4 4 285
QUEUED
Annual Playground Replacement 4 3 5 5 5 5 3 2 395
School Walk Audit 5 3 3 1 3 5 5 4 395
Library Expansion Project
(landscaping and other
improvements)
2 1 3 5 5 5 5 5 320
Tamien Innu - Central Segment 3 1 1 4 5 2 5 5 300
Tamien Innu - West Segment 3 1 1 4 5 2 5 5 300
Stevens Creek Blvd CL IV
Bikeway - Phase 2B construction
3 1 2 1 5 3 3 5 275
Park Amenity Improvements 1 1 3 5 5 5 3 2 245
Stevens Creek Blvd CL IV
Bikeway - Bandley Dr. Signal
3 1 1 1 3 3 4 3 245
Street Light Installation - Annual
Infill
3 1 1 2 3 2 2 4 220
Capital Project Support N.A.
CIP Prelim Planning & Design N.A.
PROPOSED PROJECTS
Sports Center Courts Resurfacing 4 3 5 0 0 4 2 2 300
BBF Golf Course Pro Shop
Renovation
4 3 5 0 0 3 1 2 280
SCB/SR 85 NB ramp Intersection
improvements
3 0 2 1 4 3 5 4 275
Memorial Park Pickleball Sound
Attenuation
4 3 3 0 0 4 1 2 255
UNFUNDED PROJECTS
Stocklmeir and properties 5 0 5 2 3 3 1 0 295
McClellan Ranch Preserve Barn
Renovation
3 2 5 2 3 3 2 1 285
BBF Golf Course Irrigation 3 1 5 3 2 2 3 2 280
Bollinger Road Corridor Constrn 5 0 1 1 3 4 3 3 280
Bollinger Road Corridor Design 5 0 1 1 3 4 3 3 280
BBF Golf Course Pond 3 1 5 3 2 2 3 1 275
Blackberry Farm Play Area
Improvements
3 2 4 2 5 3 1 1 275
CIP Prioritization process - FY 26 - 27 Prioritization Matrix Page 1 of 2
APPENDIX B
PRIORITIZATION MATRIX - FY 26-27 CIP PROJECTS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Totals
LEGEND:
Facilities
Parks
Streets & Infrastructure
Transportation
Sustainability
Health & Safety Regulatory /
Legal Mandate
Asset
Condition &
Infrastructure
Risk
Climate
Resilience &
Sustainability
Strategic
Alignment
Community
Benefit &
Equity
Financial
Leverage &
Cost
Effectiveness
Project
Readiness
Points
Range: 0
to 500
30 15 15 5 10 5 15 5 100
UNFUNDED PROJECTS (CONT.)
Memorial Park projects: All-
Inclusive Playground (Phase 1A)
3 2 4 2 5 3 1 1 275
Building Electrification Analysis 2 1 4 5 5 1 3 3 275
Memorial Park projects: Softball
Field Lighting
3 2 4 3 1 2 3 2 270
Quinlan Community Center
Electrification
2 1 4 5 5 1 3 1 265
Blackberry Farm Golf Course
Restroom Renovation
3 3 3 2 1 3 3 1 265
Electrification of other City 2 1 3 5 5 2 3 2 260
Library Electrification &
Resiliency upgrades
2 1 3 5 5 2 3 2 260
Regnart Road Improvements,
(Phase 2)
3 2 3 1 4 2 1 2 245
Blackberry Farm Pools Water
Heating Upgrades
2 1 2 5 5 2 3 2 245
Storm Drain Improvements -
Bubb Road, Phases 1-3
3 2 3 1 4 2 1 1 240
Memorial Park projects:
Amphitheater renovation (Phase
2A)
2 1 2 2 5 4 1 2 210
Memorial Park projects: Central
Picnic Area, Alves entrance and
plaza, Softball field, tennis courts
and basketball courts (Phase 2B)
2 1 2 2 5 4 1 2 210
Memorial Park projects: Fields
and Alves parking lot renovation
(Phase 2C)
2 1 2 2 5 4 1 2 210
Memorial Park projects: Pickleball
Courts, Bocce, Event Lawns and
Restrooms (Phase 1B)
2 1 2 2 5 4 1 2 210
Memorial Park projects: Senior
Center and Quinlan parking lot
renovations (Phase 3)
2 1 2 2 5 4 1 2 210
Linda Vista Park Improvements:
picnic area, path and field
improvements
3 1 2 2 2 3 1 1 200
Pumpkin and Fiesta Storm Drain
Project (Phase 2)
2 1 3 1 4 2 1 1 195
Park Pathways Paving 2 1 2 2 3 3 1 1 180
Portal Park Improvements: picnic
area, rec bldg.
2 1 2 2 2 3 1 1 170
Blackberry Farm Entrance
Improvements
2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 160
Carmen Road Bike/Ped Bridge 3 0 0 1 3 2 1 2 160
Stevens Creek Blvd Separated
Class IV Bikeway, Phase 3
3 0 0 1 3 2 1 2 160
Replace Non-Functional Turf &
Improve water efficiency
2 0 1 5 2 2 1 1 150
Blackberry Farm Family Restroom
Conversion
0 2 3 3 1 2 2 1 145
SV Hopper EV Parking 0 0 0 5 3 3 4 2 140
Park Shade Structures 2 0 0 2 3 5 0 1 130
Merriman Road Storm Drain 2 1 3 1 0 1 0 0 130
Fiber Expansion 0 0 0 0 5 2 1 1 80
Little Rancho picnic area 1 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 70
New Neighborhood Parks 0 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 60
CIP Prioritization process - FY 26 - 27 Prioritization Matrix Page 2 of 2
CIP FY 2024-2025 • 5-year plan ATTACHMENT A
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS
FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
and 5-YEAR PLAN
NEW PROJECT NARRATIVES
LEGEND
Health and Safety Improvements
Council, Commissions and/or Community Priority
High Priorities established through City’s Master Plans or
Condition Assessment Reports
Projects that are subsequent phases of existing projects;
or projects in the queue that need to be activated
Projects that have secured external funding
CIP FY24-25 • 5-year plan ATTACHMENT A page 1
Projects that have secured external funding, or which
can result in positive fiscal impacts to the City
CIP FY25-26 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVESATTACHMENT B
FISCAL YEAR 2025 - 2026
PROJECT NARRATIVES
Attachment B
FISCAL YEAR 2026 - 2027
and 5-year Plan
NEW PROJECT NARRATIVES
ATTACHMENT C
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PROJECT NARRATIVES
Projects with Additional Funding for FY26-27:
1. Facility Condition Assessment (FCA) Improvements
2. City Hall Annex
New Projects for FY26-27:
3. Blackberry Farm Golf Course Pro Shop Renovation
4. Sports Center Courts Resurfacing
5. SCB/SR 85 Northbound Ramp Intersection improvements
6. Memorial Park Pickleball Sound Attenuation
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Facilities Condition Assessment Implementation (FCA) page 1
Ongoing initiative to address Facilities Deficiencies
Proposed FY26-27 City
Funding
$ 1,250,000
Total Funding $ 4,564,421
City Funding (Existing) $ 2.946,470
City Funding FY26-27 $ 1,250,000
External Funding $ 417.312
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 2,383,423
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan General Plan
Project Category Facilities
Project Type Design & Construction
Origin of Request Public Works
FY Initiated FY 18-19
Project Description
Ongoing initiative to implement projects from the prioritized recommendations of the 2017/18 “Comprehensive
Facility Condition and Use Assessment” and the “2022 Facility Condition Assessment” (FCA) reports.
Project Justification
The 2017/18 FCA report and the 2022 FCA report assessed the condition of nearly every City owned facility. Several
projects were identified as high priority facilities with significant deficiencies that need to be addressed to avoid costly
repairs and extended service interruptions.
Prioritization
Health & Safety 4 Improving the facilities through these projects directly advances
the health and safety of the users.
Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 In many cases the projects bring the systems up to current code
compliance.
Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
4 The facilities are dilapidated such that the 2018/2022 report called
these critical projects.
Climate Resilience & Sustainability 4 Improving the facilities with more energy efficient infrastructure
addresses CAP goals.
Strategic Alignment 3 Providing safe facilities is of great importance in the General Plan.
Community Benefit & Equity 2 Having facilities with functioning HVAC, water and non-leaking
roofs benefits the community.
Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
4 Some grant funding has been identified. The cost effectiveness of
the more energy efficient and updated systems will be realized
immediately.
Project Readiness
2 In some cases, drawings are available.
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Facilities Condition Assessment Implementation (FCA) page 2
Operating Budget Impacts
As older equipment is replaced with energy efficient equipment and as building systems are upgraded significantly,
savings are expected in both maintenance and energy costs. These projects do not typically require additional staffing
or materials after they are complete.
Funding Information
This initiative began in FY18-19 and received additional City funding in FY23-24. CDBG grant funds were received for
work on the Senior Center property, in FY23-24 and FY24-25. Future use of CDBG is limited to a few eligible City sites.
External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 367,951 T.B.D.
Other External Sources $ 0
Expenditure Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Annual Expenditures (GL#) 2025-26
Actual
2026-27
Projected
2027-28
Projected
2028-29
Projected
2029-30
Projected
2030-31
Projected
420-99-063 900-905, BAI 001 $ 930,998 $ 3,000,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 300,000
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
This is an ongoing program, funded annually, to improve accessibility at all public facilities throughout the City.
Project Timeline for Completion Notes
Completed projects N.A. Senior Center FAS upgrade, Quinlan
Community Center (QCC) AC Chiller
replacements, replacement of two flat roofs at
Sports Center and QCC, Sports Center Fire
Control Center panel replacement and the
Sports Center Seismic Retrofit
Sports Center Locker and Shower rooms
improvements
June 2027 Permitting nearing completion, Bidding
process will initiate in Summer 2026.
Construction may be 6-8 months duration
Misc. HVAC equipment upgrades Traffic
Maintenance Bldg, Service Center, BBF
Pools, QCC, Community Hall)
December 2027 Competitive procurement process will require
staggering the projects.
Flat Roof replacements: QCC and Sports
Center
Fall 2027 Bidding is complete, award of GC contract
and construction follows.
Flat Roof replacements: Monta Vista (2),
Senior Center
Spring 2028 Procurement can initiate after the completion
of (2) current roof projects.
FAS upgrades: Monte Vista (2), Creekside
Park Rec, Service Center & Sports Center
June 2028 Design and Procurement will be initiated in
FY26-27.
Library FAS TBD Planned for initiation in FY27-28
Project Location
Locations: Various
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
City Hall Annex page 1
10455 Torre Avenue Improvements
Proposed FY26-27 City
Funding
$ 5,000,000
Total Funding $ 8,025,000
City Funding (Existing) $ 3,025,000
City Funding FY26-27 $ 5,000,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) $ 2,566,456
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan General Plan
Project Category Facilities
Project Type Design & Construction
Origin of Request Public Works
FY Initiated FY 21-22
Project Description
Program, plan and build facility improvements to facilitate short-term and long-term use[s] of the building. The scope
of work will include programming, planning, design, and construction. Emergency Operations Center (EOC) program
and requirements added to the scope of this project in late 2022.
Project Justification
The proximity of this property to the Civic Center, and its central location within the City, lends itself to numerous
uses, including a satellite and/or interim City Hall facility.
Prioritization
Health & Safety 5 Providing EOC services for residents is essential.
Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 The building must be brought up to code (building, etc.) for use
as a City Facility.
Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
3 The building is stable, but the interior is dated to the mid-70’s and
has some hazmat remediation is required.
Climate Resilience & Sustainability 3 The updated facility will be much more energy efficient than the
existing systems can provide.
Strategic Alignment 5 Council’s CWP made this a priority project.
Community Benefit & Equity 5 The residents will benefit from the EOC, the continuation of City
services, and conference rooms in the public area.
Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
3 The City has committed to funding the project.
Project Readiness 5 The construction documents are 60% complete.
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
City Hall Annex page 2
Operating Budget Impacts
Adding this facility to the Real estate portfolio will adding to the Facilities and Grounds divisions operating budgets.
We estimate a 0.5 FTE for Grounds and a 0.5 FTE for Facilities. Adding this facility will also increase maintenance
supplies and janitorial contracts. The cost of 1 FT Maintenance Level II should be added here.
Funding Information
When the CH Annex/EOC project was re-activated, it was noted that the projected project costs would be $8 million.
The FY26-27 funding will be a placeholder in the annual budget until construction bids are received.
External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0
Expenditure Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Annual Expenditures (GL#) 2025-26
Actual
2026-27
Projected
2027-28
Projected
2028-29
Projected
2029-30
Projected
2030-31
Projected
420-99-248, CIV 011 $ 458,544 $ 7,400,000 $166,456
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
This is an ongoing program, funded annually, to improve accessibility at all public facilities throughout the City.
Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation FY21-22, reinitiated in
October 2025
Re-mobilization of the Design team
Design N.A.
Permitting April-July 2026
Construction Bid August -October 2026
Contract Award and Contracting November 2026
Construction December 2026 Construction schedule will be estimated by
GC, once contracted.
Post-Construction/Close-out June 2027
Project Location
10455 Torre Avenue
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Blackberry Farm Pro Shop Renovation page 1
Proposed FY26-27 City Funding $ 120,000
Total Funding $ 120,000
City Funding FY26-27 $ 120,000
External Funding $ 0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) N.A.
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan N.A.
Project Category Facilities
Project Type Construction
Origin of Request Parks and Recreation
FY Initiated FY 26-27 (pending)
Project Description
The Blackberry Farm Golf Course Pro Shop serves more than 40,000 golfers annually and is central to the visitor
experience. However, the facility has not been comprehensively renovated in many years and is now outdated,
inefficient, and out of alignment with current accessibility and building standards. This project proposes a full
renovation to improve functionality, safety, and customer service, including a new service counter, replacement of
worn finishes, ADA upgrades, and modernization of the existing electrical system to meet current code requirements.
Project Justification
Renovating the pro shop is necessary to bring the facility up to the City’s ADA, electrical, and safety standards,
improve functionality for staff, and enhance the overall experience for golfers. The proposed upgrades will address
deferred maintenance, reduce operational and safety risks, and ensure the pro shop reflects the level of service and
accessibility expected of a City-owned facility. It is important to note that the pro shop was not included in the 2018
Facility Condition Assessment Report.
Prioritization
Health & Safety 4 The facility is in poor condition and requires electrical upgrades.
The outdated systems will be modernized to meet current code
and operational needs.
Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 ADA and electrical upgrades are needed.
Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
5 The antiquated pro shop requires significant renovation,
including electrical upgrades. Planned improvements include a
new service counter, replacement of worn flooring and ceiling
materials, and ADA accessibility upgrades.
Climate Resilience & Sustainability 0 N.A.
Strategic Alignment 0 The facilities at the Golf Course, including the Pro Shop, were not
included in the 2018 Facility Condition Assessment Report.
Community Benefit & Equity 4 The Blackberry Farm Golf Course Pro Shop serves over 40,000
golfers annually and is central to the visitor experience, but staff
regularly receive complaints about its deteriorating condition.
Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
2 Facility improvements will decrease operational time and effort.
Project Readiness 2 Scope schematically defined. RFP/Bid procurement process
required to secure contractor to complete the work.
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Blackberry Farm Pro Shop Renovation page 2
Operating Budget Impacts
No anticipated impact to operating budget
Funding Information
No grant funding
External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0
Expenditure Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Annual Expenditures (GL#) 2025-26
Actual
2026-27
Projected
2027-28
Projected
2028-29
Projected
2029-30
Projected
2030-31
Projected
T.B.D. N.A. $120,000
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
This is an ongoing program, funded annually, to improve accessibility at all public facilities throughout the City.
Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation July 2026 Renovation work can be completed within
one FY
Consultant Procurement September 2026
Planning/Pre-Design November 2026
Design October 2026
Permitting & Environmental Clearance December 2026
Construction Bid January 2027
Contract Award and Contracting March 2027
Construction April 2027
Post-Construction/Close-out May 2027
Project Location
22100 Stevens Creek Boulevard
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Sports Center Courts Resurfacing page 1
Proposed FY26-27 City
Funding
$210,000
Total Funding $210,000
City Funding FY26-27 $210,000
External Funding $0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) N.A.
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan N.A.
Project Category Facilities
Project Type Construction
Origin of Request Parks and Recreation
FY Initiated FY 26-27 (pending)
Project Description
Resurface all tennis courts and Sport Court at the Sports Center to maintain a suitable and safe playing environment.
Project Justification
The tennis court surfaces have deteriorated due to extended use and weather exposure and are now beyond their
typical five- to seven-year lifespan (last resurfaced in 2016). Resurfacing will prevent further damage, reduce liability,
and avoid more costly repairs in the future.
Prioritization
Health & Safety 4 While the courts are not currently unsafe, these conditions create
uneven playing surfaces that may pose a tripping hazard if
allowed to worsen. Timely resurfacing will mitigate these
emerging risks and preserve safe, consistent playing conditions
for the community.
Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 Courts must be maintained to meet safety standards.
Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
5 The tennis courts have not been resurfaced in approximately ten
years and are showing signs of surface fatigue, including cracking
that has continued to develop and expand.
Climate Resilience & Sustainability 0 N.A.
Strategic Alignment 0 Master Plans do not prescribe this work - this is required
maintenance that has an engineering component.
Community Benefit & Equity 4 Staff have observed an increase in user complaints related to
cracking and surface conditions on multiple tennis courts.
Feedback indicates growing concern about playability and surface
consistency, particularly as cracking becomes more noticeable
over time.
Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
2 Timely resurfacing will assist in keeping resurfacing and
maintenance costs down. As courts continue to degrade (e.g.
worsening/deepening and developing cracks) repair and
resurfacing becomes more expensive.
Project Readiness 2 Scope defined. RFP/Bid procurement process required to secure
contractor to complete the work.
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Sports Center Courts Resurfacing page 2
Operating Budget Impacts
No anticipated impact to operating budget
Funding Information
No grant funding
External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0
Expenditure Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Annual Expenditures (GL#) 2025-26
Actual
2026-27
Projected
2027-28
Projected
2028-29
Projected
2029-30
Projected
2030-31
Projected
T.B.D. N.A. $210,000
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
This is an ongoing program, funded annually, to improve accessibility at all public facilities throughout the City.
Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation July 2026 Resurfacing work expected to be completed
within a month
Consultant Procurement N.A.
Planning/Pre-Design N.A.
Design N.A.
Permitting & Environmental Clearance N.A.
Construction Bid August 2026
Contract Award and Contracting November 2026
Construction December 2026
Post-Construction/Close-out January 2027
Project Location
21111 Stevens Creek Boulevard
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Stevens Creek Blvd/State Route 85 NB Ramp Intersection
Improvements page 1
Proposed FY26-27 City Funding $ 0
Total Funding $ 600,000
City Funding FY26-27 $ 0
External Funding $ 600,000
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) N.A.
Funding Source Westport cond. of dev.,
Dev. In-Lieu
Approved [Master] Plan BTP
Project Category Transportation
Project Type Design and Construction
Origin of Request Public Works
FY Initiated FY 26-27 (pending)
Project Description
The project includes design, construction, and project management for improvements at the Stevens Creek
Boulevard/northbound SR-85 on-ramp intersection. Improvements include a separated Class IV bike lane, a tightened
right-turn on-ramp, and traffic signal upgrades providing protected movements for vehicles, bicyclists, and
pedestrians. The project will retain a civil engineering consultant to finalize design and obtain necessary Caltrans
approvals.
Project Justification
The existing high-speed on-ramp creates safety risks for bicyclists and pedestrians. Proposed improvements include a
tighter ramp turn, dedicated signal phasing, a separated bike lane, and a protected pedestrian crossing to significantly
improve safety. These improvements were required as part of the Westport development, but Caltrans Permitting
delays prevented their completion, leading the City to collect in-lieu funds to complete the project. The project now
requires final design completion and Caltrans permit approval before proceeding.
Prioritization
Health & Safety 3 The project reduces known safety issues for drivers, bicyclists and
pedestrians.
Regulatory / Legal Mandate 0 This project is not code-required.
Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
2 Improvements to the multimodal crossings at the intersection are
overdue.
Climate Resilience & Sustainability 1 Minor efficiency improvements in equipment.
Strategic Alignment 4 The 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan identified improvements on
Stevens Creek Boulevard as the highest priority.
Community Benefit & Equity 3 This intersection is heavily trafficked, and improvements will
have a positive impact on all modes of transportation through it.
Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
5 The project is funded entirely by the Westport development
project’s Developer In-Lieu fees.
Project Readiness 4 Design is substantially complete, but Caltrans approval and
permitting are still required.
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Stevens Creek Blvd/State Route 85 NB Ramp Intersection
Improvements page 2
Operating Budget Impacts
No anticipated impact to operating budget
Funding Information
The project is funded entirely by the Westport development project’s Developer In-Lieu fees.
External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0 $0
Other External Sources $ 150,000 $ 450,000
Expenditure Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Annual Expenditures (GL#) 2025-26
Actual
2026-27
Projected
2027-28
Projected
2028-29
Projected
2029-30
Projected
2030-31
Projected
T.B.D. N.A. $ 150,000 $ 450,000
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
This is an ongoing program, funded annually, to improve accessibility at all public facilities throughout the City.
Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation September 2026 Renovation work can be completed within
two years.
Consultant Procurement September 2026
Planning/Pre-Design September 2026
Design October 2026 Substantial Design completed (Feb. 2026)
Permitting & Environmental Clearance September 2027 Approval and permitting from Caltrans is
required since Caltrans owns the right-of-way
where these improvements are being planned.
Construction Bid November 2027
Contract Award and Contracting February 2028
Construction March – June 2028
Post-Construction/Close-out June 2028
Project Location
Intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard
and State Route 85, Northbound Ramp
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Memorial Park Pickleball Sound Attenuation page 1
Proposed FY26-27 City
Funding
$ 150,000
Total Funding $ 150,000
City Funding FY26-27 $ 150,000
External Funding $0
Remaining Funds (Feb 2026) N.A.
Funding Source Capital Reserve/GF
Approved [Master] Plan N.A.
Project Category Facilities
Project Type Construction
Origin of Request Public Works
FY Initiated FY 26-27 (pending)
Project Description
Provide sound attenuation measures at the Memorial Park Pickleball courts. The sound panels will require a new
reinforced fence.
Project Justification
Neighboring residents have concerns about the degradation of the acoustic environment of their residences. Pickleball
is very popular and generates great community. By providing sound attenuation to mitigate the noise, we hope to
create a better environment for all.
Prioritization
Health & Safety 4 Sound dampening measures will provide acoustic improvement
for the neighboring residences..
Regulatory / Legal Mandate 3 Increasing the structural capacity of the fence is required to hold
the sound panels.
Asset Condition & Infrastructure
Risk
3 The facilities are in good shape, but the sound quality is not
addressed/.
Climate Resilience & Sustainability 0 N.A.
Strategic Alignment 0 Master Plans do not prescribe this work - this is a facility
improvement that has an engineering component.
Community Benefit & Equity 4 By providing sound attenuation to mitigate the sound of the
pickleball play, we hope to create a better environment for
residents and players.
Financial Leverage & Cost
Effectiveness
1 The improvements will reduce risk.
Project Readiness 2 Cost estimates have been obtained.
CIP FY26-27 • 5-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 PROJECT NARRATIVE
Memorial Park Pickleball Sound Attenuation page 2
Operating Budget Impacts
No anticipated impact to operating budget
Funding Information
No grant funding
External Funding
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31
Grants $ 0
Other External Sources $ 0
Expenditure Schedule/5-year Plan Information
Annual Expenditures (GL#) 2025-26
Actual
2026-27
Projected
2027-28
Projected
2028-29
Projected
2029-30
Projected
2030-31
Projected
T.B.D. N.A. $ 150,000
Projected Schedule/5-year Plan Information
This is an ongoing program, funded annually, to improve accessibility at all public facilities throughout the City.
Item/Phase Timeline for Completion Notes
Project Initiation July 2026 Work can be completed within the fiscal year.
Consultant Procurement N.A.
Planning/Pre-Design N.A.
Design N.A.
Permitting & Environmental Clearance N.A.
Construction Bid August 2026
Contract Award and Contracting November 2026
Construction February 2027
Post-Construction/Close-out May 2027
Project Location
Memorial Park