Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutASAC Minutes 12-18-1975CITY OF CUPERTINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino Telephone: 252-4505 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ARCHITECT -ORAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE HELD ON DECEMBER 18, 1975 IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SALUTE TO THE FLAG The meeting was called to order at 7:12 p.m. by Chairman Koenitzer with the Salute to the Flag. ROLL CALL Members present: Irvine, Sallan and Chairman Koenitzer Members absent: Dressler Staff present: Assistant Planner Steve Piasecki INFORMAL REVIEW OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT USE PERMIT APPLICATION: None UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of December 4, 1975 On page 7, paragraph 3, last sentence should read, "...felt they should be notified they have acted in accordance with the City's desire for upgrading sites but also acted contrary to the City's procedures." Moved by Member Sallan, seconded by Member Irvine, to approve the Minutes of December 4, 1975 as amended. Motion carried, 2-0-1 Abstain: Irvine POSTPONEMENTS: None WRITTEN CO1UNICATIONS: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None The announcement was made that no item would be initiated after 11:30 p.m. HC -153 Page 1 HC -153 Page 2 MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 18, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING PUBLIC HEARINGS: HC --51,015.1:9 1. Application HC -51,015.19 - Syd Jacobs, DBA Jerry's Pants and Things Moved to end of •Since the applicant was not present, Member Sallan made a motion to move agenda this item to the end of the agenda. Seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 3-0 HC -51,333.5; 2. Application HC -51,333.5 - Tandem Computers, Inc. requesting approval Tandem of a sign plan for a light industrial building located on the north Computers, side of Valley Green Drive approximately 330 ft. west of Saratoga - Inc. Sunnyvale Road. Staff report: Assistant Planner Piasecki noted the sign complied with the ordinance and appeared to be compatible with surrounding signs. He referred to exhibit displayed on board. After a brief discussion, chairman Koenitzer opened the meeting for public comments. There were none. Member Sallan moved to close Public Hearings. Seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 3-0 HC -51,333.5 Member Sallan moved to approve Application HC -51,333.5 to the City approved Council with standard H -Control conditions and Exhibits attached, F and F-1. Seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 3-0 The applicant was informed his application had been approved and would be heard by the City Council on January 5, 1976. HC -51,174.1; 3. Application HC -51,174.1 - Whitevale Company, Inc. (A & W) requesting approval of a sign plan for a restaurant facility located at the t�iitevale j southeast quadrant of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road. Company,Inc1. (A&W) W) 4• Application HC -51,218.2 - Whitevale Company, Inc. (A & W) requesting HC -51,218.2`: approval of a sign plan for a restaurant facility located at the Con t. to northwest corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Portal Avenue. end of agenda Since the applicant was not present, Member Sallan moved to continue items 3 and 4 to the end of the agenda. Seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 3-0 MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 18, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING IHC-153 ;Page 3 5. Application HC -51,230.11 - Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc. (Carl's Jr.) requesting approval of site, architecture, land- scaping, grading, lighting and signing for a fast-food restaurant located at the southwest corner of Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road and Homestead Road. Staff report: Assistant Planner Piasecki referred to exhibits and site plan as displayed on board. He noted the Planning Commission had denied application for drive -up window and requested that portion be converted into parking area and landscaping. Another condition of approval required that a pedestrian walkway be incorporated into the site which would be adjacent to the westerly main driveway aisle for the Center. Assistant Piasecki pointed out an 18 ft. aisle on the eastern side of the building adjacent to the parking. This aisleway is unnecessary and could be converted to landscaping. He pointed out a change in the circulation pattern which would allow 10 ft. of landscaping on the west side along the main driveway entrance leading from Homestead Road. The Engineering Department has suggested that the pedestrian path be a raised sidewalk with curbs and ramps at the ends of each aisle to allow for a better separation between the vehicles and pedestrians. The Traffic Department has also suggested that the northerly most driveway aisle be terminated at this main entrance. This would also allow for more landscaping and parking for the shopping center. Chairman Koenitzer questioned how much flexibility there was on location' of building. He suggested moving the building to the center of the available landscaping area; putting an even amount of landscaping on each side of the building. The Assistant Planner felt this would be satisfactory. Slides of the site were shown. Mr. Dave Garrison, 1200 North Harbor, Anaheim, said he was in favor of relocating building and separating landscaping. With regard to the pedestrian crossway, he questioned how many pedes- trians would be using it. He wondered if the raised concrete sidewalk was really necessary. He felt stripping would accomplish what was needed. Mr. Garrison also said he was not convinced that closing driveway parallel to Homestead Road would not inconvenience their customers and create problems on side. Member Sallan had Mr. Garrison describe flow of traffic and problems he foresaw. The committee however was in agreement that quick right and left turns off a major road create dangerous situations. HC -51,230.11 Carl's Jr. HC -15 3 Page 4 MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 18, 1.975 H -CONTROL MEETING Mr. Garrison said they would like flexibility on landscaping and locating of sidewalks. Chairman Koenitzer said he definitely wanted more than hedge along side of building since this is one of the -major traffic exposures. Landscaping should be especially concentrated on westerly side. The applicant agreed, reminding them however there is a 4' over- hang on building. Mr. Garrison explained lighting on roof. This is a neon tube under the penthouse fascia giving slight glow to roof. This lighting gives depth and dimension to building in dark hours. With regard to trees being planted along driveway, Mr. Garrison pointed out they are not allowed a free standing sign so must rely on signs on east and north elevations. Heavy landscaping would obscure these signs. Staff was asked to clarify what was wanted on pedestrian walkways. Mr. Piasecki said height was necessary to keep cars from tareatening pedes— trians. The entire length of the sidewalk would be raised. Member Sallan spoke to philosophy of trying to get pedestrians out of cars and walking through shopping centers. Mr. Garrison repeated he did not think the sidewalks would be used. Mr. Piasecki noteu there are plans for 106 units to be built across the street; these people would probably be using the sidewalks. Mr. Garrison said this might be encouraging people to cross the street in the middle of the block. n n Chairman Koenitzer suggested Carl,Jr.- shuuld ue Led Lila on high hat portion to match rest of buildings in the complex. Mr. Garrison said it was felt their choice of material made them more distinctive and gave them definite identification. Chairman Koenitzer pointed out they should find out what color tile was I used by Payless and P&W and use the same color. In response to Chairman Koenitzer, Mr. Garrison pointed out where the same type of fixture would be used in, the parking lot and where they would be using the 14' fixture around the building. Member Sallan ascertained existing fixtures are 30'. Chairman Koenitzer felt that having 30' poles east of the building and 14' poles west of the building would be satisfactory. The 30' poles will match the existing shopping center poles. The building will provide visual separation between the 30' poles and the 14' poles. Mr. Garrison explained lighting behind the sign portion of penthouse area. Member Sallan asked if the building would function without lighting on roof line. Mr. Garrison said it would; also in answer to Member Sallan, he said he did not know of any of their units which did not have the light. Member Sallan said she was not able to justify why they needed lighting on the roof. MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 18, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING Member Sallan referred to staff's.suggestion of bringing signs down on building. Mr. Garrison said they are away from the center and signs need to have best visibility. If sign were on building, one car in front of it would obscure it. Mr. Piasecki displayed color samples. Mr. Garrison displayed photo of sign on existing facility. Member Sallan ascertained the letters are approximately 12". Member Sallan questioned choice of plants on Homestead Road and made suggestion for substitution. She also suggested using an evergreen tree or adding more of existing trees. Chairman Koenitzer suggested clumping of shrubs. Member Sallan also suggested a tree well be placed in parking lane areas. Four trees could be added. She also suggested undulating mound along frontages using several varieties of plants. The committee assured Mr. Garrison they would like to have it look better than the existing landscaping. Chairman Koenitzer then opened the hearing for public comments. Mr. J. D. Vanderlaan, 20465 Saratoga -Los Gatos Road, Saratoga, spoke on a horticulture study made which showed that 5 gal. plants have a better growth pattern than the 15 gal. size. Chairman Koenitzer asked Mr. Vanderlaan about possibility of having rest of site upgraded. Mr. Vanderlaan said when the major building was constructed they would be prepared to upgrade site. Member Sallan moved to close Public Hearings. Seconded by Member Irvine, Motion carried, 3-0 HC -15.3 Page 5 Public Hear ing closed Chairman Koenitzer noted they had not resolved the question of sidewalks The Assistant Planner pointed out proposed location on site map. Member. Irvine felt -the painted sidewalk would be sufficient, he suggested putting it in the center of the 10' landscaping area. Member Sallan moved to reopen Public Hearing. Seconded by Member Irvine: Public Hear ing reopens Motion carried, 3-0 Mr. Vanderlaan said he understood where the raised sidewalk was to go and they would put it in and close the entrance on east side. Member Sallan moved to reclose hearings. Seconded by Member Irvine, Motion carried, 3-0 Public Hear ing reclose HC --15 3 Page 6 MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 18, 1975 H -CONTROL 'MEETING Member Sallan moved to recommend approval of Application HC -51,230.11, Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc. to the City Council with the standard H -Control conditions and the Exhibits B, C, D, E and A 1st Revision. The following additional conditions •are attached: Site: (1) As noted on Exhibit A lst Revision, the easterly driveway to 'the site to be closed and replaced with landscaping. (2) Building is to be moved easterly so that there is approximately an equal amount of landscaping,oneither side of the Carl, Jr. restaurant. (3) There is to be a' raised sidewalk provided on the site as marked on Exhibit A lst Revision to a point southerly of the driveway entrances with the portion going across the driveway suitably marked to indicate pedestrian crossing. (4) The applicant is to close the existing access on site just off the. Homestead Road entranceway. Architecture: (5) Roof tiles on the final plan are to be the same color as those existing in the shopping center now. Landscaping: (6) For the frontage on Homestead Road, an undulating mound with ivy. (7) At least tw.o types of shrubs are to be planted at distance between 8' and 10' on center or in groupings. The intent of it is to provide suitable screening and aesthetic design for the center. The choice is to be other than the proposed item D on the legend. (8) Addition of four trees on the easterly boundary abuting the raised sidewalk. (9) The addition of one tree in each of the three parking rows' on Exhibit A 1st Revision. The plants proposed should be 5 gal. size for shrubs and 15 gal. size for trees. All of these modifications that are approved in the landscaping plan are subject to staff approval when the applicant brings in the final plan. Seconded by Member Irvine. MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 18, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING A discussion was held on the survival of trees in the parking rows. Mr. Vanderlaan said his experience has been the trees will not last a year. AYES: Members Irvine and Sallan, Chairman Koenitzer NOES: None Motion carried, 3-0 The applicant was notified this would now be heard by the City Council at its January 5, 1976 meeting. At 8:40 p.m. a recess was -taken with the meeting reconvening at 9:00 p.m 6. Application HC -51,216.5 - McDonald's Corporation requesting approval of site, architecture, landscaping, grading, lighting and signing for a fast-food restaurant located at the southeast corner of Homestead Road and Stelling Road. Staff report: Assistant Planner Piasecki referred to exhibited site plan. He reported City Council's concern regarding the relationship between the new McDonald's building and the existing Brunswick Center. A second concern was the tiled patio area. If there is to be an out- door seating area on the site it will require a modification of the use permit. Mr. Piasecki spoke to the applicant's proposal of three flag poles on the north side of the building. These would be used for displaying the American flag, the State flag and one additional flag. Staff suggested if the flags were approved, they would be moved to a different location on the site. Staff was of the opinion there should be more of a relationship between the Brunswick building and the McDonald's building. Mr. Piasecki referred to the staff report which indicated landscaping modifications proposed by the applicant. The Assistant Planner noted additional lighting on the restaurant will consist of single fluorescent tubes hidden between the beams located on the roof. Concern iias peen voiced about these; however the applicant„ feels this lighting is an important element of the building and would like to retain them. Mr. Piasecki then described the signing as requested. There was concern{ over the color scheme for the McDonald's portion of the shopping center sign as it related to the other portions of the sign. C-153 age 7 HC -51,230.11 approved w/ conditions HC -51,216 .5 McDonald's Corporation HC -153. Page 8 MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 18, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING Slides were shown of the site and existing building. Mr. Bill Churchfield, 452 Addison, Palo Alto, said the tiled area on the west side is the entrance. Chairman Koenitzer clarified that if it were to be used for outdoor eating in the future, there would have to be a sun shade of something that could integrate into design of the building. Mr. Churchfield said they had no plans for using it as an eating area at this time. Member Sallan said her concerns were those spoken to in the preliminary review. She thought the issue of compatibility had become stronger. She did not approve of the lights on the roof as presented. The roof' line and color should be more compatible with what was existing. 'Mr. Churchfield said they could use the grey slumpstone and pointed out the roof lines weren't that different. With regard to the lights in the beams, Mr. Churchfield said these are an integral part of their design. Chairman Koenitzer said he was concerned also about architectural compatibility and did not feel it was at all compatible with the Brunswick building. He felt this was the time to insist on closer compatibilitywitharchitecture already existing in center. He saw no reason for lighting roof lines of any building in the center. Member Irvine said he agreed on lighted beams, but he did not feel there was a real architectural gem in Brunswick building. He did not go along with designing everything to a building that is not that appealing. He felt if the roof was metal on the McDonald's building it would cheapen the architecture. Member Irvine pointed out that good design and good architecture does not need to be exactly what is there - you can compliment as well as copy. He felt eliminating the lighting from beams would make the building satisfactory. It was ascertained the parking lights would be the same as those existing in the center. Chairman Koenitzer noted the sign on building roof would be permitted and the building signs were satisfactory. The McDonald proposal for their share of the center ground sign was then discussed. Mr. Churchfield displayed a colored rendering using the typical McDonald's red background with yellow arches and white letters. Member Sallan said the white background with yellow arches and red letters would be compatible. Mr. Churchfield then displayed a color' rendering showing this combination of colors. The committee agreed this was a satisfactory proposal. Mr. Churchfield asked to use the bottom space on the sign. Chairman Koenitzer explained why this would not be feasible at this time. Member Sallan questioned the choice o.f Olive trees. Mr. Jim Hoffman, landscape architect, said ne main reason fl MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 18, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING complimented the architecture. He said he was not satisfield with the existing landscaping. He said he had used 4 or 5 plants that are in the existing landscaping and the same ground cover which would tie it together at the ground level. By placing the Olive trees all around the corner he felt they would fit in. They will be using mature trees. In answer to Member Sallan, Mr. Hoffman said there are two concrete walkways indicated. Chairman Koenitzer indicated the ladder to the equipment on the roof and expressed the wish it could be better hidden. Mr. Charles V. Johnson from McDonald's on Highway 9 explained why it was necessary. Chairman Koenitzer felt if it were on the east side of building it would not be so noticable. A discussion of the ladder followed. Assistant Planner Piasecki noted this was not in view on similar facilities and felt it could be designed in some other manner or placed in another location so it would not be so visible. Mr. Mike Emmert of McDonald's agreed it could be moved to other side of building. He suggested using slumpstone and enclosing ladder. The exposed part of the ladder could be painted the same color as the building. Mr. Johnson said they have talked to Fire Marshall. They have an inside access but the O.S.H.A. will not allow them to use it. They had talked about enclosing it and the Fire Marshall said no. There are times when they have to get on the roof once a week. He assured the committee the ladders were child proof. Mr. Piasecki suggested it might be suitable to allow staff time to investigate this further. Member Sallan said she would prefer to continue architecture. Chairman Koenitzer advised Mr. Churchfield of their concern regarding compatibil- ity. _ Mr. Churchfield said he had a letter from the City Council that material did'not have to be identical. He felt the colors were compatible. More definite guidelines were asked for. A lengthy discussion followed. IIC-15 3 Page 9 Member Irvine moved to continue Application HC -51,216.5 to the next HC -51,216._`: H -Control meeting. Seconded by Member Sallan. continued Motion carried, 3-0 H4-153 Page 10 HC -31. Jchn Sob rate continued to end of agenda HC -51,075.39 HC -51,075.41 continued to end mt . HC -51,174.1 A & W MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 18, . 1975 U -CONTROL -MEETING Chairman Koenitzer asked that staff make a report on use of ladder and how it might be moved to less visible location. The applicant asked for continuation until January 22, 1976 meeting. It was agreed. 7. Application HC -51,088.18 - John Sobrato Since the applicant was not present, Member Sallan moved to put Applica- tion to the end of agenda. Seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 3-0 8. Application HC -51,075.39 and HC -51,075.41 - The Westfield Company Although the applicant was not present, a member of the audience asked to speak to this application. Permission was granted. Mr. Mike Stout,.520 Meadow Avenue, Santa Clara, said he represented residents and homeowners adjacent to this development. He said their primary concerns were height of masonry fence in back of building along east boundary •and .type of trees and shrubs in 10' buffer zone. He -thought -it --was to be -w4' fence --from- sidewalk going- back 2e'--be-fore---- — starting 6' fence back to last two homes and then the 8' fence. That is the way they. still want it. With regard to shrubs and trees, Mr. Stout said they did not want large trees growing 30' or 40' in the air and hanging over homeowners' proper ties. He asked for shrubbery that did not get much higher than the fence. It was noted that redwood trees were shown on plan. Chairman Koenitzer assured Mr. Stout these concerns would be discussed with the Westfield Company. Staff is to notify Mr. Stout of the next meeting. Assistant Planner Piasecki pointed out that ten bike lockers were being required in place of parking spaces. Member Sallan moved to continue Application HC -51,075.39 and HC -51,075.41 were continued to end of meeting. Seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 3-0 3. Application HC -51,174.1 - Whitevale Company,. Inc. (A & W) requesting approval of a sign plan for a restaurant facility located at the southeast quadrant of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Stelling Road. MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 18, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING 4. Application HC -51,218.2 - Whitevale Company, Inc. (A & W) requesting approval of a sign plan for a restaurant facility located at the northwest corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Portal Avenue. Chairman Koenitzer ruled items 3 and 4 would be heard together with separate motions for each application. Staff report: Assistant Planner Piasecki referred to colored renderings of the two buildings -which showed the signs mounted on roof. He pointed out the architecture of the two buildings do not lend themselves to wall or roof mounted signs. In both cases, both buildings have non -conforming ground signs. The applicant has cooperated in modifying the sign program to comply with the ordinance by eliminating the ground sign. It was suggested the. committee might want to consider a low profile monument sign which would require a sign exception. Slides were shown of the two sites and existing buildings. Also an existing sign at another A&W location.. Mr. Jim Cassidy, Los Gatos, representing A&W, agreed that architecture of buildings did not allow for any logical place for signing. They are not happy with the locations as proposed. They have used low profile signs with goodly amount of landscaping under it and found this to be a good solution. The signs would be installed in existing planter areas with added landscaping. He exhibited a drawing depicting such a proposal. Member Sallart expressed concern about size of sign. She commented the A&W sign is a strong sign. She suggested the ground sign be redesigned. The oval sign did not relate to building or pedastal. Mr. Raymond A. Bartels, Menlo Park, said the sign would be lowered to 8' and encase., in slumpstone. Proportions of sign and height of pole were discussed. Mr. Cassidy suggested they return with a redesign. Member Sallan said she would like to see redesigned proposals for building signs also. Mr. Cassidy was advised to file for a ground sign variance. He asked to be continued to the January 22, 1976 meeting. Member Sallan noted landscaping plan would be necessary also. The applicant agreed. Member Irvine asked to have a man included in next proposal so the scale of sign could be rioted. HC -153 Page 11 HC -51, 218.2 A & W HC -453 Page 12 HC -51,174 .1 and HC -51,2 18.2 Continued to 1/22/76 Change of Copy approved HC --51,088.18 John Sobrato' MINUTES OF THE. DECEMBER 18, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING The hearing was opened t& public comments. There were none. Member Sallan moved to continue Applications HC -51,174.1 and HC -51,218.2 to the January 22, 1976 H -Control meeting so applicant has a chance to redesign signs, taking into account the possibility of new wall signs. Seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 3-0 The Assistant Planner displayed an exhibit for a change of copy sign for a store in Blaney and Bollinger shopping center. After a brief discussion, Member Sallan moved to approve the change of copy for Cupertino Hardware. Seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 3-0 7. Application HC -51,088.18 - John Sobrato requesting approval of site, architecture, landscaping, grading and lighting for a light industrial building located at the northeast corner of McClellan Road and Bubb Road in the West Valley Industrial Park. Staff report: Assistant Planner Piasecki referred to staff report relating to this application. He noted the Traffic Engineer had recommended a number of modifications to make for better ingress and egress. The applicant had agreed with recommendations and a revised site plan was exhibited. The changes were pointed out. Mr. John Sobrato , Palo Alto, spoke to the interior circulation. The change necessitates renegotiating lease with McDonnell -Douglas which could not be done before this meeting. He noted it is very difficult• to get them to make a modification but he will try. He suggested it be conditioned on this. Hr. Sobrato pointed out they have followed through with established theme. In answer to Chairman Koenitzer, he described the textured scoring of building. . . It was ascertained the mounding along McClellan Road would be 3' and that the same light fixture as exists on adjacent properties would be used. Mr. Sobrato said the tenants would come in for signing approval as the building was being built on speculation. Member Sallan noted they needed to know that signs are. being planned for without having an. exception. Mr. Sobrato said he felt it was unreasonable. that they could have only one ground sign for a 5 acre parcel.. . MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 18, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING The hearing was then opened for public comment. There were none. Member Sallan moved, seconded by Member Irvine, to close Public Hearings. Motion carried, 3-0 The applicant was reminded that employee eating area should be incorpor- ated into approval. The applicant agreed. Member Sal.lan moved to recommend approval of Application HC -51,088.18 to the City Councilwith the enclosed Exhibits and standard H -Control conditions and further that (1) Eating area be provided as per agreement between applicant and staff. (2) Applicant is going to attempt to talk to McDonnell -Douglas to see if internal parking and access can be modified to give them additional parking stalls. Seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 3-0 8. Applications HC -51,075.39 and HC -51,075.41. - The Westfield Company requesting approval of a reactivation of architecture and site approval for three light industrial buildings located in Vallco Park at the northwest and southeast corner of Pruneridge Avenue and Tantau Avenue. Chairman. Koenitzer reported the comments of Mr. Michael Stout to the applicant relative to this application. Mr. Terry Rose, 21311 Milford Drive, Cupertino, said they had met with owners and discussed size of fence and landscaping. They will try to place trees so they don't offend anyone on either side. Mr. Rose said the only change in their proposal is the possibility of increasing size of one building and decreasing size of the other. The applicant agreed to use a lower, fuller growing tree along the fence. The hearing was then opened for public comment. There were none. Member Sallan moved to close Public Hearings, seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 3-0 HC -15 3 Page 13 Public Hear lings closed HC -51.,088.1 approved w/ conditions HC -51,075 .2 and HC -51,073.4 Westfield Comp any Public Hear ing cloeci (.--153 7 � N[ IL''11?.S OF TEE DLC1N'IBEtt 18, 1.975 H:- CONTROL MI,"I'.tINC; its {.0/).3`1 i?i'_lltber Sa11.aa moved to recommend approval of Applications I{C-51,075,39 arid' and NC --x1,075.41 with the standard conditions and further, that :fr, ,0/5 ,4I >rovd w/ (1) Aip1.i_cant work with the staff to coma up with a suitable place aSicps g for the bicycle J.ockers. (2) .Pl^nting along rear`property line will not be much in excess of existing fence, to the satisfaction of applicant, homeowners and staff. Seconded by Meribex Irvine. Motion carried, 3--0 The applicant was notified this would be heard by the City Council at the January 5, 1976 meeting. ADJ O U Riv HEN T At 11:30 p.m, the meeting was adjourned to the next regular meeting of January 8, 1976 at 7:00 p.m. APPROVED: /s/ R.D. Koenitzer, Jr. Chairman ATTEST: / s / Wm. E. Ryder City Clerk