Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutASAC Minutes 08-21-1975CITY OF CUPERTINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino Telephone: 252-4505 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE HELD ON AUGUST 21, 1975 IN THE LIBRARY CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL, CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SALUTE TO THE FLAG The meeting was opened at 7:04 p.m. by Chairman Koenitzer with the Salute to the Flag. ROLL CALL Members present: Dressler (7:15), Grubb, Irvine, Sallan, Chairman Koenitzer Members absent: None Staff present: Assistant Planner Toby Kramer INFORMAL REVIEW OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT USE PERMIT APPLICATION: None UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of August 7, 1975 On page 1, under concerns, Member Sallan wanted it clarified that her concern was that whatever material was used on the walls would match the walls of the existing bowling alley. On page 5, paragraph 3, the last sentence should read, "The applicant agreed to return in July, 1976". On page 5, paragraph 8, add the sentence, "He pointed out that the gas. station has been painted and the small signs removed". On page 6, paragraph 1, the first word in second line should be "southeast". On page 9, paragraph 2, the second line should read, "soon as the business office opens." HC -7..45 Page 1 On page 10, paragraph 6, insert the words "pole light" between "other" and "standards". HC -145 Page 2 Minutes of 8/21/75 approved as amended HC -51,339 :i & T, Inc. (Te r ran omi c)) MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 21, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING On page 10, paragraph 7, the first sentence should read, "....concrete base of light pole wasn't sunk....." Member Sallan moved, seconded by Member Irvine, to approve the Minutes of August 21, 1975 as amended. Motion carried, 4-0 POSTPONEMENTS: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Letter of thanks from former committee member Dan Weinstein. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None Chairman Koenitzer announced no item would be initiated after 11:30 p.m. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Application HC -51,339 - M & T, Inc. (Terranomics) requesting approval of a lighting plan .for the Coco's Restaurant facility located on the east side of Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road south of Silverado Avenue. Continued from H -Control meeting of August 7, 1975. Staff report: Assistant Planner Kramer reviewed that the lighting had been continued to give the committee an opportunity to view the lights in the parking lot and the applicant time to prepare data indicating the illumination patterns of the 30 ft. poles and possible 20 ft. poles. Ms. Kramer referred to exhibited map showing the illumination patterns of the 30 ft. and 20 ft. light standards. The intensity of light' directly under the pole 30 ft. high is 20 foot candles; under the 20 ft. pole would be 30 foot candles. The wattage used in the fixtures is 400. The applicant has stated that it is not possible to change the bulb without changing the whole workings of the fixture. Since the wattage cannot be lowered, the lower pole may produce too much of a glare which would be more undesirable than the taller poles. Mr. Larry Knight, representing Terranomics, answered Member Sallan that he did not know why the 400 watts could not be changed with- out changing the fixture. MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 21, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING Chairman Koenitzer noted that had the lights been reviewed prior to installation he would have preferred a different type of fixture for this area; something more like that at Bank of America and Bob's Big Boy. Member Grubb asked if the light could be of a warmer hue. Mr. Knight said the white was a much clearer light. He said if the bulb could be changed to one of a warmer hue they would be glad to do so. Member Irvine noted the lens had not been installed when he viewed the lights and wondered if this would change the starkness of the lights. Member Sallan suggested a study be made of what tones in light bulbs are available for use in commercial fixtures. The meeting was opened for comments from the public. There were none. Member Dressler moved to close Public Hearings. Seconded by Member Sallan. Motion carried, 5-0 Member. Sallan moved to recommend approval to City Council of Applica- tion HC -51,339, M & T, Inc. (Terranomics) with standard H -Control conditions and the additional condition that if it is available or possible the applicant consider some type of lighting fixture for a diffusion of light into warmer tones. Seconded by Member Dressler. Motion carried, 5-0 Chairman Koenitzer advised this would be heard by the City Council at its September 2, 1975 meeting. 2. Application HC -51,002.13 - Jack J. Street requesting approval of site, architecture, landscaping and grading for four apart- ment units located on Lot "0", La Cresta Income Estates, Alpine Drive. Staff report: The Assistant Planner indicated the only concern on this application was grading. Referring to exhibits displayed, Ms. Kramer described the proposed architecture and landscaping. Ms. Kramer distributed cross section she had prepared showing the line -of -sight from these units to adjacent single-family lots. These lots are vacant at this time. HC -145 Page 3 Public Hear- ings closed HC -51,339 approved w/ condition HC -51,002.13. Jack J. Street HC -145 Page 4 Architectut MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 21, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING With reference to the drainage, Ms. Kramer noted the drawings had been revised. She pointed out these revisions. Mr. Jack J. Street, 1068 The Dalles, Sunnyvale, described the mitigat- ing measures that had been taken to solve drainage problem. He said the foundations are all engineered block foundations that will drain properly and they will work. Mr. Street answered Member Dressler there is a 4" pipe that day -lights at various points. He has used this foundation for 15 years and it works. Mr. Street said the mansard roof will be guttered all the way around and located the downspouts. He also said there are new storm drains and catch basin.. Mr. Street answered Member Irvine that the windows on top floor are built out with shield over it. Landscaping Chairman Koenitzer said although there are no single family residences behind these units now, he would suggest the applicant consider plant- ing a'row of trees or shrubs that will grow to height of 10 ft. to 20 ft. so when the single family houses are built, there will be a screen. Public Heal ings close( Chairman Koenitzer also suggested instead of Junipers, the applicant use something that grows to approximately 4 ft.; preferably an evergreen broadleaf variety. The applicant was agreeable. Member Sallan suggested another Monterey pine be added. Mr. Street. said the Monterey pine gets so large. He agreed to.add another tree of smaller growth pattern. Mr. Street pointed out retaining wall locations. He answered Member Sallan they would not be unattractive and possibly would not be seen from the street. Member Sallan suggested several more plants be added to screen the wall on the front portion of the property. The hearing was opened for public comments. There were none. Member Sallan moved to close Public Hearings, seconded by Member Grubb. Motion carried, 5-0 A brief discussion was held on the screening of the rear property. Member Sallan pointed out it is everyone's responsibility to provide s creeping. MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 21, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING Member Sallan moved to recommend approval of HC -51,002.13 (Jack J. Street) to the City Council with the standard H -Control conditions and the enclosures Exhibits A 1st Revision, B and C with the following additional conditions: Relative to landscaping, that (1) " An additional tree be.planted in front portion of property to be indicated on the landscaping plan. (2) The plant type listed as Prostrata Juniper be substituted with some type of shrub that grows to about 4 ft. in height. (3) Additional plants be installed in the front planter where the retaining wall is to be installed so as to provide screening. Seconded by Member Irvine. AYES: Members Dressler, Grubb, Irvine, Sallan, Chairman Koenitzer NOES: None Motion carried, 5-0 Chairman Koenitzer advised this would be heard by the City Council at its September 2, 1975 meeting. 3. Application HC -51,002.11 - Stephen Sanborn requesting approval of a modification of site and architecture for a six -unit apart- ment complex located on the north side of Alpine Drive approxi- mately 100 ft. east of Foothill Boulevard. Staff report: Assistant Planner Kramer noted that due to construction costs and Building Department requirements, the garages have been placed in what was previously open parking space. The former garage space will be landscaped to provide a more pleasing entrance. Unit 6 has been moved further from the rear property line so it is now 42 ft. rather than 34 ft. The laundry and sauna have also changed locations. Ms. Kramer pointed out revised locations on exhibits. The new plans also calls for all cedar shakes and wood to be used on buildings with no stucco. HC -145 Page 5 HC -51,002.13 approved wi conditions HC -51,002.11 Stephen S anb o rn IIC-145 Page 6 Site Architectu Landscaping+ HC -51,002.1 approved MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 21, 1975 11 -CONTROL MEETING Ms. Kramer also reported that Mr. Sanborn had indicated there might be a change in the roof line. Mr. Stephen Sanborn, 23048 Granger, Los Altos, answered Member Grubb the reason for change in roof line was his newly acquired partner's opposition to flat roofs. He described possible new roof line. Chairman Koenitzer noted he found it difficult to envision that type of roof working in successfully with this architecture. There were no comments on proposed changes on site. Mr. Sanborn answered Member Dressler there would be no increase in the living areas as a result of the modification. They were moving the garages away from the units because of the fire wall that would have been required. It was cheaper to get cars out of units than to install the fire walls. Mr. Sanborn indicated he was also thinking of developing the front area. Mr. Sanborn answered Chairman Koenitzer that the garage building would not be higher than 8 ft. Member Grubb ascertained the projections on end of roof would be eliminated if hip roof used. Member Irvine said he did not think the architectural change should be considered until an elevation drawing had been presented. Chairman Koenitzer agreed. _ Mr. Sanborn answered Chairman Koenitzer he would probably have only citrus trees as he had been advised apricot trees would present problems. After a brief discussion, the committee members agreed to approve modifications as presented and have the applicant return with drawings of new roof line. The hearing was then opened for public comments. There were none. Member Sallan moved to close Public Hearings, seconded by Member Irvine. Motion carried, 5-0 Member Irvine moved to approve Application HC -51,002.11 with the standard H -Control conditions, Exhibits A 2nd Revision and B 2nd Revision. Seconded by Member Dressler. Motion carried, 5-0 MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 21, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING C-145 Page 7 Chairman Koenitzer advised the applicant the modifications had been approved as presented. OLD BUSINESS: Ms. Kramer reported that Mercury Savings landscaping was incomplete and a letter would be sent to them. With regard to Portal Plaza, Ms. Kramer said a letter had been sent to the bank explaining they would not get occupancy until the landscaping areas were satisfactory. Member Sallan said part of approval for landscaping at Don's Burgers was for some type of ivy or planting on back wall. A discussion was held on possible mechanisms for insuring that conditio s for approval are met. Staff was asked to present a list of possible alternates for the committee to consider. NEW BUSINESS: Chairman Koenitzer referred to illegal signing at Louis' Shell Station on, corner of De 1,--i.za Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard. Ms. Kramer said they had been contacted. Measures to enforce conformance to City regulations were discussed. Chairman Koenitzer suggested when it was time for a business to renew its license, a letter explaining what regulations would apply to them should be included; an information sheet to remind them of the City's requirements. Ms. Kramer said at some point soon they would be discussing new format and other facets of this committee. She suggested committee members should jot down their ideas. Ms. Kramer also noted that as soon as the Sign Ordinance was completed the sign companies would be sent a copy as they were also responsible for seeing that signs conformed to regulations. Member Sallan suggested standard conditions should be reconsidered and interim landscaping guidelines should be finalized. iC-.l!'5 !ge 8 AdjournmentI MINUTES OF Tti1? AUG(IST 21, 1975 ll-CONTROL MEETING Member Irvine said lie had been approached by Homeowners Association regarding on street parking on Valley Green Drive. The parking lot stays empty and the cars park on the street. Ms. Kramer said she would refer this to Public Works. It was suggested that if on street parking is permissable, it be limited to one hour. Ms. Kramer reported two signs at Oak Shopping Center would he coming in for consideration: a non -illuminated sign on wall of bookstore and the Tennis Racquet store whose sign cannot be seen in present location. At 8:34 p.m. Member Dressler moved to adjourn to the next regular meeting on September 4, 1975 at 7:00 p.m. Seconded by Member Grubb. Motion carried, 5-0 ATTEST: /s/ Wm. E. Ryder City Clerk APPROVED: /s/ R.D. Koenitzer Chairman