Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutASAC Minutes 04-10-1975CITY OF CUPERTINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino Telephone: 252-4505 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL CORIITTEE HELD ON APRIL 10, 1975, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SALUTE TO THE FLAG The meeting was called to order at 7:15 p.m. by Chairwoman Sallan with the Salute to the Flag. ROLL CALL Members present: Dressler (7:25), Koenitzer, Rogers, Weinstein (7:30 Chairwoman Sallan Members absent: None Staff present: Assistant Planning Director Robert Cowan Assistant Planner Steve Piasecki Chairwoman Sallan noted since the agenda was a lengthy one and there. were a number of applications which would necessitate lengthy dis- cussions,any item past #6 would probably not be heard. INFORMAL REVIEW OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT USE PERMIT APPLICATION: 4-U-75 Coldwell Banker Management Corporation (Dr. Brown): Construe-- tion of a 49,200 sq. ft. light manufacturing facility, located westerly of and adjacent to Bandley Drive approximately 30 ft. northerly of the intersection of Bandley Drive and Lazaneo Drive. Concerns: Location of truck loading area. Parking stalls on Bandley Drive frontage: it was suggested moving stalls to rear of building or going to 45° angle parking with one way traffic circulation. Member Koenitzer noted this area was zoned for commercial/ industrial/residential and expressed concern that so far all the applications have been for industrial. He felt the Planning Commission should address this. HC -135 Page 1 xc-135 Page 2 Minutes of 3/20/75 continued HC -51,148.: Lucky Stork (Gemco) MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1975 R -CONTROL MEETING UNFINISHED BUSINESS: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of March 20, 1975 Member Rogers moved, seconded by Member Koenitzer, to postpone approval of March 20, 1975 meeting minutes until the next regular meeting. Motion carried, 5-0 POSTPONEMENTS: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None ORAL COi �MUNICATIONS: Member. Dressier asked if the flags presently standing behind the chairs of the committee could be displayed in another manner as they presented an obstacle in their present location. Chairwoman Sallan announced that no item would be initiated after 11:30 p.m. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Application HC -51,148.1 Lucky Stores, Inc. (Gemco) requesting approval of a modification of architecture to the existing Gemco Store located at the northeast corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Saich Way. Continued from H -Control meeting of March 20, 1975. Assistant Planning Director Cowan reviewed the application briefly. He reiterated staff's request for a position that a landscaping plan be developed by Gemco that would allow landscaping to be installed as building modifications progressed. Ile referred to a report by Mr. John Busto indicating there is no immediate hazard. Chairwoman Sallan said she had communicated with the City Attorney, Mr. Adams, on April 8, 1975, and he had said the committee could deny this application, even though the request was for modification to another portion of the site. Member Koenitzer questioned whether the proposed dock pad would present a problem on southerly edge to cars driving over it. Mr. Gary Westernoff, Project Engineer for Lucky Stores, said the pad would have a pitch but it would flush out. MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING Member Weinstein said it was gratifying to have the City Council finally support this committee. He could not support any application from Gemco until they gave some indication of being willing to upgrade this site. In answer to Chairwoman Sallan, Mr. Westernoff said there were no injury records available; this was a preventive measure. Chairwoman Sallan ascertained Mr. Westernoff had a copy of Mr. Busto's report. She suggested since only minor changes were necessary, the balance which had been planned for this modification could be put into land- scaping. Mr. Westernoff said items 1 and 4 would require the modification as requested. Member Rogers noted she could not fully understand the application with the material being offered. Member Koenitzer said he was sur- prised they did not seem to consider the exterior appearance as important as the interior. The meeting was opened to comments from the public. There were none. Member Weinstein moved, seconded by Member Rogers, to close Public Hearings. Motion carried, 5-0 Chairwoman Sallan.said she was sympathetic but at the same time, she would like to see an approach that made modifications for relieving safety hazard but also included some landscaping as a beginning for the upgrading of this site from the community's point of view. Member Rogers moved, seconded by Member Koenitzer, to reopen the Public Hearings. Motion carried, 5-0 Member Rogers asked Mr. Westernoff about landscaping to dock area. Mr. Westernoff said planter tubs with junipers was all they could propose. It was ascertained no plans had been prepared. It was !'! noted the application had been continued with the request that the applicant return with a plan showing some landscaping to dock pit area.1 Mr. Westernoff said they were not opposed to screening with some planter tubs. After further discussion, Chairwoman Sallan ascertained the majority of the committee would like to see a plan to screen the wall. Member Dressler moved, seconded by Member Weinstein, to close the Public Hearings. Motion carried, 5-0 Member Koenitzer asked if Gemco had a permit to store gardening materials outside the fenced area as this was being done. Staff will check. HC -135 Page 3 Public Hear- ing closed Public Hear- ing reopened Public Hear- ing closed E , t;C-135 MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1975 II -CONTROL MEETING Page 4 i Member Weinstein moved to recommend that City Council deny Applica- tion HC -51,148.1 on the basis that the safety question in fact may not exist and that there has been no indication of any kind of upgrading on the part of Lucky Stores to the site in general. Seconded by Member Dressler. HC -51,148.1 AYES: Members Dressler, Koenitzer, Weinstein, Chairwoman Sallan denied NOES: Member Rogers Motion carried, 4-1 Chairwoman Sallan announced this would be heard by City Council at its April 21, 1975 meeting. t ' H -C-53,322,11 2. Application HC -51,322.1 - W. J. Herman (Rancho Deep Cliff) Rancho Deep; requesting approval of modification of landscaping for a Cliff 61 -unit single-family condominium development located adjacent to and easterly of Stevens Canyon Road approximately 200 feet southerly of Riverside Drive. Continued from H -Control meeting of March 20, 1975. The Assistant Planning Director referred to Exhibit C-3 describing a split rail fence concept to be constructed on the easterly boundary line between the subject project and the Deep Cliff Golf Course which had been requested by the committee at its last meeting. Member Rogers asked if staff had considered that the fence would let golf balls through which could be a hazard. Mr. Cowan said this had been discussed and it might be something that would have to be taken into consideration at a later date. Mr. W. J. Herman, 220 State Street, Los Altos, said if the fence proved unsatisfactory, they would put something else in at a later date. Member Koenitzer noted the roses and other thorny plants might dis- courage people from coming over the fence. - Mr. Herman answered Member Rogers that this type of rose was expected to bloom seven months out of the year. - The hearing was opened for public comment. There were none. Public Hear ing closed Member Weinstein moved, seconded by Member Koenitzer, to close Public Hearings. Motion carried, 5-0 MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING Member Weinstein moved to recommend landscaping modification as proposed on Application HC -51,322.1. If there is any indication of difficulty with errant golf balls, the applicant will be welcome to approach the committee for change. Seconded by Member Rogers. Motion carried, 5-0 Chairwoman Sallan noted the application would be before the City Council at its April 21, 1975 meeting. 3. Application HC -51,075.221 - American Microsystems, Inc. (Valico Park) requestin.g approval of signing for a light industrial building located on the east side of Tantau Avenue approximately 270 feet north of Pruneridge Avenue. Although the applicant was not present, Assistant Planner Piasecki said staff had slides of an existing sign on other building which was identical in size and color. The slides were shown. Mr. Piasecki pointed out the locations of the proposed signs. The hearing was opened for public comment. There were none. Member Koenitzer moved, seconded by Member Weinstein., to close Public Hearings. Motion carried, 5-0 Member Koenitzer moved to recommend approval of Application HC -51, 075.221 to the City Council with standard conditions, exhibits as shown and condition that the letters and background for the signs be the same as those used on the signs shown at this meeting. Seconded by Member Rogers. Motion carried, 5-0 Chairwoman Sallan ascertained the applicant would be notified of this recommendation and that it would be heard by the City Council on April 21, 1975. HC -135 Page 5 HC -51,322.1 approved HC -51,075.22 American Microsystems Inc. Public Hearings closed HC -51,075 .22 approved llC-•135 Page 6 HC -51,274 .1 Hobil Oil Corporation MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1975 II -CONTROL MEETING 4. Application HC -51,274.1 - Mobil Oil Corporation requesting approval of site, architecture, landscaping, lighting and signing for an existing service station site located at the southwest corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Miller Avenue. Assistant Planner Piasecki reviewed application, noting staff's con- cern with the relocation of the trash an.closure. This should be buffered with landscaping from the building to the south. Mr. Piasecki pointed out the site is lacking overall in landscaping and orderliness. He suggested another planter box should be located on east side to balance it out. He also suggested there could be some landscaping on public right-of-way since space is. lacking between pump island and sidewalk. There should be striped parking stalls at rear for orderliness. Mr. Piasecki . also pointed out the sign does not conform with the committee's guidelines. There could be a monument sign in the corner .landscaping area. He pointed this area out on the site plan, noting the sign should also have the price information on it. Mr. Piasecki answered Member Rogers that there had been no information at this time regarding benches for district transit lines. Slides were shown of the site. Mr. Piasecki pointed out bus stop area, telephone booths and existing landscaping. Mr. John Kehrli, 66 Bokt Road, San Mateo, explained this station has been nominated by Mobil for upgrading. They are not planning any construction changes. He explained the proposed modifications. Mr. Kehrli explained the trash enclosure had to be removed from next to building by order of the Fire Marshall. He also noted that if they put a strip of landscaping at south property line there would be a "no man"s" strip as the adjacent landscaping was set back from boundary line. Mr. Kehrli answered Member Weinstein that they would be putting in new pumps. Member Weinstein also ascertained they will be taking the existing light fixtures down and replacing with new ones, but using the same poles. These poles are approximately 15 ft. high. The lights were to be 500 watt bulbs. Mr. Kehrli described the new fixture. Member Koenitzer said he would like to see how the proposed lights would look from Miller Avenue. Chairwoman Sallan said a diagram of some kind should be presented. The committee agreed lighting should be continued. MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1.975 H -CONTROL MEETING Site: Member Weinstein asked about the striping for parking stalls. Mr. Kehrli pointed out where these would be located. Mr. Preston Michael, Mobil Oil was a metal box type to screen the same color as the building. Company, explained the trash enclosure the dumpster. This would be painted Member Koenitzer suggested additional landscaping next to planter on west end of building and landscaping in corner southern end of property. Member Weinstein disagreed. He they asked for any landscaping beyond the plan, it should in front of pumps on Stevens Creek Boulevard. pump islands areas at felt if only be that Mr. Kehrli pointed out what was being proposed were aesthetic improvements. They are agreeable to monument type sign to match building. He also pointed out they have upgraded landscaping by 300% already. Mr. Michael said they are not making any construction changes, just cosmetic improvements. Right now they do not have funds for the additional $4000.00 it would cost to add the 2 ft. planters in front of the islands. Chairwoman Sallan referred to station at Stelling, noting how much the planters in front of the pump islands hadadded to the aesthetics of the station. She wished they could at least do one. Mr. Michael said this would be a major project and not what they were engaged in at this time. Mr. Michael said they had had planter boxes previously and the exhaust fumes from cars had killed the plants, but they would be willing to try this again. Chairwoman Sallan explained the concern of the committee about the trash enclosure at proposed location. Mr. Piasecki referred to the parking stripes to be provided in this area.. Mr. Michael said some trees could be placed adjacent to the enclosure. He also agreed to. put boxes or pots of plants at west end of building and adjacent to the pumps. Architecture: Member Koenitzer ascertained the building would be painted. Landscaping: Member Weinstein suggested using Gold Coast junipers rather than the Tams as proposed. The applicant agreed. Lighting: to he continued. Signs: Member Weinstein questioned the disc sign on building. Mr. Michaels described it and said this had been found to be the optimum size proportion -wise. HC -1.35 Page 7 I10-135 Page 3 MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING With regard to t:he monument sign, Member Weinstein ascertained they were speaking of a 12 to 15 ft. sign. Mr. Kehrli explained it would be on brick with prices incorporated. Member Weinstein felt the sign should not be over 8 or 10 ft. Member Koenitzer pointed out some Shell and Standard stations had reduced their signs of similar design to less. After further discussion, the applicant agreed to lower the sign. The meeting was then opened to public comment. There were none. Public Hear= Member Rogers moved, seconded by Member Koenitzer; to close Public ing closed Hearings. Motion carried, 5-0 Motion i Member Koenitzer moved to recommend approval of HC -51,274.1 of the site, architecture and landscaping, subject to standard conditions, ex'Oibi.ts presented tonight and the following special conditions: (1) That striping be put in on the south boundary to mark off parking spaces. = (2) That landscaping be placed around the trash enclosure on south boundary; simple shrubs to help hide trash enclosure. (3) Planter boxes be added along west wall with plants of 3 to 6 ---------ft. height. Amendment (4) Some other variety of juniper other than Tam be selected for the planting areas, subject to approval by the staff. Seconded by Member Weinstein. Chairwoman Sallan questioned whether the number of parking spaces should be indicated. Mr. Cowan said they would like at least three spaces per bay with cars being parked in the parking areas. Member Weinstein moved to amend motion to include condition that cars parked on the site shall use the striped parking area and no other area. Seconded by Member Rogers. VOTE ON AMEND'IENT : AYES: Members Dressler, Koenitzer, Rogers, Weinstein, Chairwoman Sallan NOES: None Amendment passed, 5-0 MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING VOTE ON MOTION: AYES: Members Dressler, Koenitzer, Rogers, Weinstein, Chairwoman Sallan NOES: None Motion carried, 5-0 Chair•*oman Sallan noted the application for site, architecture and landscaping had been approved and would be heard by the City Council at its April 21, 1975 meeting. Member Koenitzer moved to continue the lighting and signing portions of Application HC -51,274.1 to the next regular meeting. Seconded by Member Rogers. Motion carried, 5-0 At 9:35 p.m. a break was taken with the meeting reconvening at 9:45 p. m. Chairwoman Sallan again announced it was unlikely any items after 6 would be heard tonight. She noted staff was being asked to con- sider those applications needing lesser degree of study be put to the earlier part of the meeting. HC -135 Page 9 HC -51, 274.1 approved w/ conditions (site, architecture & landscap- ing) Lighting & signing continued 5. Application HC --51,075.40 - Vallco Fashion Park Shopping CenterHC-51,075.40 requesting approval of modification of site, architecture, Vallco conceptual landscaping and grading for the proposed J. C. Fashion Park Penney store on the east side of Wolfe Road and site modifi- cation, architecture and conceptual landscaping for portions of the Center on the west side of Wolfe Road. Assistant Planning Director Cowan said the applicant would be making their presentation. He referred to information from Penney's and documents regarding Portal Plaza, copies of which were distributed. It was noted Portal Plaza is directly affected by application tonight with regard to perimeter road. Mr. Walter Ward, General. Manager of Vallco Park, said the original proposal for Penney's had been designed by Vallco architects and the present proposal had been prepared by Penney's "in-house" team. The plans have been reviewed by Wurster, Bernardi and Emmons and found to be compatible with the rest of the Center. i;c-i35 MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING re 10 Mr. Ralph Butterfield, of Wurster, Bernardi and Emmons, reiterated they had found the Penney design to be satisfactory and then intro- duced. Mr. Harry Wilson, J. C. Penney representative. Mr. Wilson explained the first presentation had not fit their merchandising system. They are now asking for modification of prior application. He described the changes made, referring to colored rendering and site plan. He referred to sample board exhibiting samples of materials to be used. Member Koenitzer ascertained the signs would be on the parapets over entrances as indicated on colored rendering. Mr. Wilson pointed out where signs would probably be located and described the Penney logo. The letters are internally illuminated. _ MemberWeinsteinasked for a comparison of heightbetween the Bullock store and the Penney store. He said he hoped nothing was going to be taller than the Bullock's building. Member. Koenitzer said he shared Member Weinstein's concern about the height of the building. Mr. Wilson said it would require the entire second floor above tba to handle air conditioning equipment normally put in "penthouse!' atop the roof. Mr. Butterfield -noted Bullock's had 12 units on roof with parapet built high enough to conceal them. It was ascertained Bullock's is approximately 34 ft. tall and the proposed Penney`s eiould be 41 ft. Member Rogers felt the stores could not be compared because of grade levels. She suggested moving parapet back to lessen visual impact. Member Weinstein felt if Bullock's could design an acceptable building at 34 ft. so could Penney's. Member Koenitzer ascertained the parapet was -8 ft. and the letters of J. C. Penney's would be 5 ft. Member Weinstein said he did not think there was any way this committee would go along with 5 ft. high letters to catch people's eyes from the freeway. He felt there was a problem in height and there would probably be a problem with the signs. It was noted it was the concensus of the committee that either the height should be lowered or the architecture changed to make it appear to be lower. Mr. Ward commented on Bullock's appearance of height. finished it will be lessconspicuous. He pointed out approved previously was the same height. Mr. Wilson changed previous modification to conform with staff's When it is that what was said they had suggestion. MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING Member Dressler said he was concerned about "breaks"; these overhangs are different than overhangs of the center. The hard shoulder of the store is uncomfortable to him. There should be some way to design continuity of center and still have identity for Penney's. He was also concerned about difference in material colors. Mr. Ben McKinney, New York representative of Penney's, said the mall court would be higher than Penney's store. He pointed out the cross -over from Wolfe Road established the floor level of the second story. They are very interested in this particular Center; they tried hard to be good neighbors. He pointed out they have a great deal at stake. He said they had just completed a study of their logo. The capital letters J, C and P will be 5 ft. and the lower case letters will be approximately 3 ft. Member Koenitzer noted the committee has constantly asked for some- thing lower and each application seems to come in with a request for something higher. Chairwoman Sallan summarized the committee's position by asking the applicants to come back with something either lower or that by its design gave the appearance of being lower. With .regard to the site plan. modification., Mr. Butterfield said if they don't have a tacit approval of revised design they could not go into revised landscaping and grading. He described proposed revised modifications to landscaping and grading, and explained why the parking lot had to be raised again to 6 ft. He referred to exhibit showing effect of this and landscape modification to cope with resulting slope. While additional exhibits were being put up, Chairwoman Sallan noted this would probably be the last application heard tonight, apologizing to those applicants who had been waiting to be heard. Member Rogers said she was getting a feeling of frustration; The committee members have seen many presentations and modifications for good and sufficient reasons, each of which modified adversely the letter and spirit of previously approved applications. Mr. McKinney explained why Penney's felt it was necessary to have the i parking lot on a level with the second floor. This would also be a convenience to the customers. lie said 5% would be the maximum acceptable grade. Mr. Ward said as a developer they were concerned too. He explained the different viewpoints. By raising peripheral road they were able to maintain a 3-1/2 ft. grade.Even with existing landscaping only, Penney's will hardly be seen. Ile said a considerable delay would be Ii C-135 Page 1.1 iJC-135 Page 12 MINUTES OF TIHI; APRIL 1.0, 1975 H -CONTROL METING detrimental to the project in terms of moving dirt from Phase I to Phase II. Member Rogers asked for assurance that cars on north lot would not be seen from Wolfe Road and that they would not be seeing a modifi- cation that would allow cars to be seen. fir. Ward assured her this would not be. Slides were shown of the site, showing grades and existing landscap- ing. Mother Koenitzer said he would prefer leaving the perimeter road at the same elevation and having a 3-3/4% grade. He said he was concerned about people parking along curb in front of the stoes as this happens now. He referred to the 10 spaces added at south entrance. Mr. Wilson -said this was a parcel. -pick up area; there -would be --no parking -as such. Mr. McKinney explained why a customer pick-up area was being included in their plans. Member Koenitzer said unless there was to be a policeman there, people would be parking there. Chairwoman Sallan ascertained the landscaping had been changed to conform to change in grade. Mr. Butterfield said they would be back with the final detailed landscaping plans. Chairwoman Sallan summarized the site modifications were acceptable at 3-1/2% and that architectural, modification was being continued hecausf concern over_parapet construction. The meeting was then opened for public comments. There were none. Member Rogers moved for approval of Penney portion of Application IHC-51,075.40 to the City Council with the standard conditions, approving the site, grading and conceptual landscaping as presented and all those portions of architecture as presented with the, exception that the roof line should be given another look; lower height of fascia or move it back or any other alternative to make it visually less high. Motion to include all exhibits as presented. I Mr. Cowan answered Member Weinstein that the -height approved previously was 38 ft. with no offset parapet. Mr. Wilson said they could not get equipment under the roof at 38 ft. Ile pointed out it would be a month or six weeks before they could get back to this committee. Mr. Ward said he believed Penney's had followed criteria presented by staff. He pointed out there is a timing problem and he felt Mr. Wilson had worked within the guidelines set. Member Dressler suggested a compromise of trying to lessen visual impact of architectural design but keeping the 41 ft. 6 in. MINUTES OF TIIE APRIL 10, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING Chairwoman Sallan referred to modifications of mall portion which had resulted in a better solution. The committee has an obligation to voice its concerns and she asked the applicants to address this con- cern, noting the community will better for it. She also pointed out this is the first time the committee has seen Penney's and she did not think it unreasonable for them to ask questions and register concerns. Member Weinstein seconded the motion.. Mr. McKinney pointed out that in raising the level of the parking lot, the visual impact of the building would be decreased. VOTE ON MOTION AYES: Members Dressler, Rogers, Weinstein, Chairwoman Sallan NOES: Member Koenitzer Motion carried, 4-1 Member Weinstein left at 12:00 midnight. Member Koenitzer asked that Penney's representatives be given copies of previous minutes that discussed this site and building. With regard to Sears landscaping on west side of Wolfe Road, Mr. Nona Mendoza of Michael C. Painter landscaping firm explained the landscaping proposed for Stevens Creek Boulevard and Wolfe Road. In answer to Chairwom:_m Saltan, Mr. Mendoza pointed out which was existing landscaping on the plan and which was the proposed. He said the shrubs would grow to a maximum of 8 ft. over a long period of time. Mr. Nona Mendoza described the treatment of Sear's parking lot at Vallco Parkway. Chairwoman Sall -an suggested widening the landscaping strip. Mr. Ward pointed out it is now 30 ft. wide and when the center is opened the parking spaces will be needed. With regard to the Portal Plaza/Sears perimeter road site modification as represented by Exhibit A-li, Chairwoman Saltan noted the committee must determine whether or not it is comfortable with the compromise solution. HC -135 Page 13 HC -51,075.4:j approved w/ conditions :iC-135 Pg 14 MINUTES OF TllE APRIL 10, 1975 lI-CONTROL MEETLNG Assistant Planner Cowan referred to previous ASAC approval of landscaping for this area; there is quite a decrease in the present proposal and what was previously approved. The landscaping at the bank has gone from 35 ft. to 19 ft., 8 ft. of which is a bicycle path. Mr. Ward explained the situation and the compromise as worked out between Sears, Portal Plaza and Sears. Be noted that under the circumstances this is the best they can do. Member Rogers asked about landscaping between the bank and the perimeter road to the east. Mr. Mendoza explained their proposal. The landscaping was discussed at length. -Chairwoman Sallan said she would be interested in knowing_ if the_ Portal Plaza application on bank could be reconsidered in light of this proposal; the City Attorney should be consulted regarding this possibility, since approval was based on different information. Member Koenitzer moved to recommend approval of Application RC -51,075.40 for the site and landscaping between Sears and Portal Plaza and for the landscaping of Sear's parking area to the City Council with the standard conditions, exhibits and following special. conditions: (1) That the raphiolepis shown on the east and west sides of the Vaf]_co Fashion Park ess roa5be gec totaller grow- ing shrub to be approved by staff. (2) Trees be added to the Portal Plaza bank area as discussed at this meeting and shown on one of the plans as discussed with Mr. Mendoza. Seconded by Member Rogers. Motion carried, 4-0 The Assistant Planning Director then reported that the applicant was asking for approval of freight elevator and trash compactors for mall shops fronting on Wolfe Road. Freight elevators were approved in western portion of site but those were not visible from Wolfe Road as these would be. Mr. Butterfield pointed out location of requested elevator and trash compactor and referred to colored rendering. MINUTES OF THE APRIL 10, 1975 H -CONTROL MEETING Member. Dressler ascertained the compactors were automatic and quiet. Member Koenitzer said he thought these were to serve all the tenants and not individual ones. Mr. Butterfield said this will probably be the only additional elevator asked for on the west side of Wolfe Road. They do not feel the visual impact would be that onerous. I4r. Butterfield asked if they should come in with each such request. The committee members indicated this was their desire at this time as the hour was too late to come up with a policy statement which would allow staff to handle subsequent requests. The committee does plan to come up with such a policy statement at a future date. Member Koenitzer moved to approved proposed new elevator and trash compactor design. Seconded by Member Dressler. Motion carreid, 4-0 Chairwoman Sallan then announced the remainder of the agenda, items 6 through 12, were continued to the April 24, 1975 meeting. NEW BUSINESS Chairwoman Sallan suggested agendizing election of officers for the next meeting. Member Rogers expressed her concern over having agendas of this length. Mr. Cowan said the City had no choice. The possibility of an adjourned meeting was discussed. Member Koenitzer reported the plants at Payless are halfway out into the traffic lane. Member Koenitzer also reported on a truck selling lobster tails and sea food parked in different places around the City. He wondered if they had a permit. Staff will check. Member Rogers reported the De Anza tennis court lights are intrusive and shine onto Stelling. It was reported a switch plate in entry way of Council Chambers was loose and ready to fall off. Assistant Planner Piasecki spoke briefly about agendizing. Chairwoman Sallan brought up changing minor applications so they could be heard earlier in the meeting. This was discussed. HC -135 Page 15 Elevator and trash compac. tor approved i1:itiU'1'N.t O. ['ifs; AI'RfC 10, 19/5 1I--(;t;:•TIM L\DJ0LrR1i ET At 1:00 a.m. the eeLint w� nrljo med to i_h ucxt riil.:irly scheduled tine r)f :\ pr.L.L 24, I') 75 ;?t 7:00 f).)11, APPROVED: I sl C . Mancy Ian --------- - Chairman ATTEST: