CC Resolution No. 7178
RESOIIJTION NO. 7178
A RESOIIJTION OF 'nIE CITY a:uNCIL OF 'nIE CITY OF aJPER1'INO
APPROVING VARIANCE FR:M ORDINANCE NO. 1154 TO AUJ:M
REWCI'IONS IN THE AM:XJNI' OF REÇUmED IANDSCAPING; SRI SERVICES,
PROPERl'Y LOCATED ON 'nIE WFST SIDE OF SCXJI'H SARA'roGA-SUNNYVAIE
ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 350 FT. SOO'IH OF RAINB:::M DRIVE
(APPLICATION I-V-87)
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support
his said application; am.
WHEREAS, the Plannin;¡' Canunission, after duly noticed p.¡blic hearings,
has fo:rwarded its recu.,.....cxJatians to the City Council.
NCM, 'IHl!=Ul<I!:, BE IT RESOLVED that after careful consideration of
maps, facts, exhibits am. ather evidence submitted in this matter, the
application for the Variance (1-V-87) be am. the same is hereby approved
with the following coroitians am. finiings:
CXJNDITIONS:
CXJNDITIONS AI:MINISTERED BY 'nIE PlANNING DEPARIMENT
1. APPRJVED EXHIBITS
'!he recomtIIe1'dation of approval is based on Exhibits A 1st
Rev., C-l, am. staff exhibit of Application 3-U-87, except
as may be amended by the Con:1itions contained in this
Resolution.
2. IANDSCAPING AND DRIVEWAY r-DDIFICATIONS
'!he landscape areas am. northern driveway shall be IOOdified
to reflect the an-angement shown on the staff exhibit.
3. APPROVED VARIANCE
'!his approval waives Con:1ition 19b of the South
Saratoga-SUnnyvale Concept1Jal Zoning Plan am. allows an
average landscape depth alon;¡ the Saratoga-SUnnyvale Road
frontage of approximately 30 feet as shown on the staff
exhibit of Application l-U-87.
RESOIDI'ION NO. 7178
'!his approval also waives Condition 19c of the South
Saratoga-SUnnyvale Conceptual Plan and authorizes
1arrlscaping alOnJ the Highway 85 frontage road as depicted
on the staff exhibit of Application 1-U-87
FINDINGS:
1) '!hat there are special con::iitions or exceptional characteristics
in the nature of the property to be affected, or that its
location or its surrouniings are such as will pennit the
Commission to make a determination that a literal enforcement of
the Procedural Ordinance would result in practical difficulties
or unnecessary hardships.
2) '!hat the granting of the variance action is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights.
3) '!hat the hearing record deronstrates that the granting of the
variance will not have a material, adverse ~ct upon the health
or safety of persons residing or workin;J in the neighbomcxxi of
the property. Further, the manner in which the property will be
used subsequent to ÍIlQ?lementation of the variance action will not
be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
the value of property or inprovements located in the the vicinity
of the property affected by said variance.
BE IT FURI'HER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be and is hereby directed
to notify the parties affected by this decision.
PASSED AND AOOPI'ED at a regular meeting of the city Council of the
City of CUpertino this 4th day of Mav , 1987 by the
following vote:
RESOIIJTION NO. 7178
vote Members of the City Council
AYES: Gatto, Johnson, Plungy, Rogers, Sparks
NOFS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
APPROVED:
/s/ W. Reed Sparks
Mayor, City of CUpertino
A'ITEST:
js/ Roberta A. Wolfe
Deputy City Clerk