HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC 12-02-2025 Item No. 12. Mary Avenue Study Session_Desk ItemCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3308
CUPERTINO.GOV
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DESK ITEM
Meeting: December 2, 2025
Agenda Item #12
Subject
Conduct Study Session on the Mary Avenue Project (“Project”), including project history,
project siting, the conditional transfer of City-owned property rights, affordability
restrictions, and remaining steps prior to entitlement and closing on the Project; and 2)
Consider Appointing Negotiator(s) for the possible transfer of certain rights to City-
owned property (APN: 326-27-053), in the form of a ground lease or a sale with the City’s
future right to repurchase
Recommended Action
Consider Mary Ave. project and provide direction on next steps including appointing the
City Manager and Interim City Attorney as Negotiators with the Nonprofit Public Benefit
Corporations Cupertino Rotary Housing Corporation, Housing Choices Coalition for
Persons with Developmental Disabilities, Inc., and Charities Housing Development
Corporation of Santa Clara County (collectively, the “Developer”), regarding the possible
transfer of property rights in the form of a ground lease or sale with the City’s future right
to repurchase on terms established by the City Council.
Staff’s responses to questions received from councilmembers are shown in italics.
Q1: I went through each attachment, and I cannot find any information on the parking
space and street configuration. This information was missing in the last study session on
Mary Avenue also. Do we plan to schedule another study session to discuss that issue?
Or can we discuss that on Dec. 2?
Staff Response: An informational memo was submitted to City Council per their direction on
August 12, 2025 by the Director of Community Development Benjamin Fu (Supplemental
Attachment J, Titled: Parking along Mary Ave. Resulting from the Mary Ave. Villas Project).
This memo provided an overview of the project and addressed the parking modifications to the Mary
Avenue Right-of-Way (ROW). City Council can ask staff at the Study Session on December 2
about the Mary Avenue parking modifications.
Q2: Would the removal of any on-street parking need to be approved by the City Council?
When would that be done? Before the project approval or after?
Staff Response: If the Council adopts a resolution approving the street vacation, that portion of the
public street ceases to be a public street; therefore, any on-street parking that existed there naturally
disappears. No additional legislative action is typically required.
Q3: When would the street be reconfigured to remove street parking? Before project
approval or construction or after?
Staff Response: The street reconfiguration would likely be approved as part of the development
approval for the Mary Avenue Villas Project.
Q4: Regarding the vacation of the public-right of way, the staff report and the FAQ states
"the City remains within the permissible timeframe to undertake the vacation process and
will do so at the appropriate stage". When exactly would be city undertake the vacation
process? Before the Admin Hearing for the project or after? Before the lease/sale
agreement or after?
Staff Response: A real estate transaction has two key milestones: (1) signing the transaction
document, in this case the Disposition and Development Agreement (“DDA”), along with the
initial entitlements, which often carry conditions to approval, and (2) what is commonly referred
to as the “closing,” when all DDA conditions and entitlement requirements have been satisfied and
the property can be conveyed to the new owner.
The DDA and entitlements are usually handled concurrently, so that the DDA is signed at the
same time the initial entitlements are granted. The City Council typically approves the finalized
DDA prior to signing. The street vacation and Surplus Land Act (“SLA”) requirements can be
satisfied at this stage, but it is not mandatory to do so. Like the entitlements, the DDA is often
executed with various closing conditions, such as completion of the vacation, fulfillment of SLA
requirements, and award of tax credits, which must be satisfied to reach the second milestone, the
closing.
Since the Mary Avenue Project is seeking tax credits in connection with its financing, the tax credit
application would be submitted at this stage. Typically, an award or denial of a tax credit
application requires approximately 4-8 months following submission of the application.
After all DDA and entitlement conditions are satisfied and the tax credit award is received, the
property is conveyed and financing secured through the concurrent execution of the grant deed or
ground lease, affordability covenant, construction loan documents, and tax credit paperwork.
Since disposition of the property occurs at closing, as described above, the City will have fulfilled
its statutory obligations so long as the street vacation and SLA requirements are completed prior
to disposition. Although these steps are typically completed closer to closing, to avoid undertaking
them prematurely if a project does not proceed, the City has intentionally coordinated and adjusted
the timeline as the transaction has developed. Since the developer anticipates submission of a tax
credit application, and completion of the street vacation and SLA requirements prior to application
may strengthen the submission, City staff currently anticipates completing both requirements
before the developer’s April 2026 tax credit application. If completion is delayed for any reason, the
City would still remain within the statutory timeframe to satisfy these requirements.
Q5: The answer to the question number 5 "Has the City complied with the Brown Act as
it relates to a decision to sell or lease the property to the developer?" did not answer the
question about the Brown Act though. The public should know that the Council has met
in closed sessions on the matter to discuss options and the legal risks associated with each
option.
Staff Response: The City has fully complied with the Brown Act, which permits a City Council to
hear matters in closed session that present facts and circumstances involving the risk of litigation
against the City, which facts and circumstances need not be disclosed.
Q6: The FAQ appears to be missing a question on which issue related to Mary Ave Villa
will be placed on the Council agenda and which issue would not? This matter is confusing
since the public has been told that the project approval will be by-right, without council
approval. But the other issues, like the vacation of public right of way and the SLA
declaration, would need to come to the Council.
Staff Response: The response to question 4 above outlines the general transaction timeline. For
clarity, we will specify here which items will be brought forward for City Council action.
• Approval of the final DDA, prior to signature
• Approval of the vacation of the public right-of-way
• Declaration of exempt surplus land pursuant to the SLA
• Approval of the form of Grant Deed (or Ground Lease), Affordability
Covenant, and related Financing Documents (this approval is typically concurrent
with the DDA but may occur after DDA execution and before closing).
• Approval of any documents that materially deviate from the previously
approved forms
Most of these approvals are typically completed at or around the time the DDA is approved, and
the same approach is anticipated with the Mary Avenue Project. The reason that “project approval”
is considered by-right is because “project approval” is referring to the closing, or disposition of the
property. At this later stage, council will have typically already approved of at least a form of the
transaction documents and will often authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute
documents subject to review by the City Attorney, once the conditions are met and the transaction
is ready to move toward closing.
As I mention above, in the case that a material deviation from the approved forms is contemplated,
additional approval from City Council may be sought. Presently, the City Staff anticipates that
approvals will be sought concurrently from Council in late January or possibly by early March.
Q7: Although the project approval does not need to come to the City Council, can the City
Council request that the project approval to come to the Council, since this is a city-funded
project, built on a city property?
Staff Response: As noted in the responses to Questions 4 and 6, all approvals related to the
transaction documents and the City’s funding commitments will be brought before the City
Council. The only reason the final documents are executed at closing without returning to Council
is that the Council will have already approved the forms of those documents in advance. If any
material deviation from the approved forms is required, those documents must be returned to
Council for approval. Accordingly, the Council will have a full opportunity to review and approve
the transaction documents before closing.
Q8: In case the city decides to sale the land at a price significantly below the market value,
what are the legal requirements/steps when gifting public property?
Staff Response: State law explicitly permits the gift of public land for affordable housing projects
pursuant to Cal. Gov. Code Section 37364.
Q9: In reviewing the staff report on the Mary Avenue Villas, can staff clarify that this
site was discussed during the Housing Element development process. The first mention
of the site in connection with the HE process in the staff report is October of 2022, when
the draft HE was released.
Staff Response: As stated in the Staff Report, the first draft of the Housing Element was
made public with the Mary Avenue parcel identified as a Housing Element Site on October 10,
2022. However, prior to this, the Mary Avenue site was identified as a Housing Element Site
at the following meetings:
•December 9, 2021 – Housing Commission received an introduction to the Housing
Element Update Process & Preparation for Mapping Exercise. Please see the meeting
details and materials. The need for ELI and Special needs housing was discussed.
•April 26, 2022 - The Planning Commission met to discuss the establishment of a housing
sites selection inventory and strategies to promote the development of new housing. The
Mary Avenue Site was introduced at this hearing.
• May 24, 2022 – The Planning Commission met to discuss the establishment of a housing
sites selection inventory and strategies to promote the development of new housing. Mary
Avenue continued to be included at this hearing.
• June 28, 2022 –The fifth Planning Commission meeting on the Housing Element
update focusing on the establishment of a housing sites selection inventory jointly
with the Housing Commission. The Mary Avenue site was called out specifically in the
consultant memo (Site 3b).
• The following City Council Meetings discussed the proposed Housing Sites:
o August 16, 2022 – Meeting materials here.
o August 29, 2022 – Meeting materials here.
o August 30, 2022 – Meeting materials here.
Attachments Provided with Original Staff Report:
A – Staff Report dated March 15, 2022
B – Parcel Map recorded on May 2, 2023
C – Staff Report dated February 6, 2024
D – Exclusive Negotiating Agreement executed on April 9, 2024
E – Staff Report dated September 4, 2024
F – Staff Report dated April 15, 2025
G – Staff Report dated July 15, 2025
H - Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan
I – Mary Avenue Project FAQ
Attachments Provided with Supplemental Report:
J - City Council Informational Memorandum: Parking along Mary Ave. Resulting from the
Mary Ave. Villas Project, dated August 12, 2025
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3403 • FAX: (408) 777-3366
CUPERTINO.GOV
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
Date: August 12, 2025
To: Cupertino City Council
From: Benjamin Fu, Director of Community Development
Re: Parking along Mary Ave. Resulting from the Mary Ave. Villas Project
Background
At the July 15 City Council meeting, the council requested an info memo to better understand the
reduction of parking along the Mary Avenue right-of-way as would be impacted by the
development of the Mary Avenue Villa project.
Since Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-21, the City Work program prioritized engaging with philanthropic
organizations to develop very low and extremely low-income housing (ELI) for the intellectually
and developmentally disabled (IDD) community. The Adopted FY 2025-27 City Work Program
continues to include this ongoing project.
On May 2, 2023, the City recorded a parcel map creating a 0.79-acre site out of surplus Mary
Avenue right-of-way (ROW) portions of which currently provide diagonal street parking to the
public. In May 2024, the City Council adopted the 6th Cycle Housing Element, which designated
this site as a Priority Housing Site (HE Site 10), with an R4 zoning designation and a residential
density of 50-65 DU/acre. The proposed Mary Avenue Villas development, consistent with the
adopted zoning designation, will include 40 living units in two, two-story buildings with a central
parking area providing approximately 22 onsite spaces for residents and employees of the
development. In April 2025, the City Council allocated funds (as discussed further in the Fiscal
Impact section of this memo) to support the development of the proposed project.
To accommodate the proposed development, as well as maintain the sidewalk, bike lanes, and
vehicle lanes along Mary Avenue, approximately 79 of the existing angled street parking spaces
located along the west side of Mary Avenue, including those within the limits of the parcel, will
be replaced by 33 parallel spaces in the ROW. Along the eastern side of Mary Avenue, 43 parallel
parking spaces will also be removed, resulting in a net on-street parking loss of 89 spaces (79+43-
33 spaces). Please see Attachment A Street Parking Exhibit, and Attachment B Mary Site Plans.
Sustainability Impact
No sustainability impact.
Fiscal Impact
Costs associated with this work program item are budgeted in the BMR Housing Fund 265-72-71
750-052. No additional fiscal impact would incur should the City Council direct the remaining
appropriated funds to be utilized for the entitlement review. Should the City Council deny the
use of the appropriated funds, the remaining budgeted amount would return to the City’s BMR
Affordable Housing fund for future uses.
On April 15, 2025, the City Council authorized an allocation of $4,083,250 of cash assistance to the
Project. The allocation is comprised of $3 million of funds from the City’s BMR Affordable
Housing Fund, $908,683 of Permanent Local Housing Allocation (PLHA) funds, and $174,567.37
of CDBG funds to be used for public infrastructure improvements. These three allocations will
provide a total of $4,083,250 of cash assistance to the Project.
City Work Program (CWP) Item/Description
Preserve existing and develop new BMR/ELI Housing: Explore opportunities to preserve existing
expiring BMR housing. Develop ELI (Extremely Low Income) and BMR housing units for
Developmentally Disabled individuals (IDD) on City-owned property as well as the County-
owned sites.
Council Goal:
Housing
California Environmental Quality Act
No California Environmental Quality Act impact.
_____________________________________
Prepared by: Gian Paolo Martire, Senior Planner
Reviewed by: Benjamin Fu, Director of Community Development
Approved for Submission by: Tina Kapoor, Interim City Manager
Attachments:
A - Street Parking Exhibit
B - Mary Avenue Villas Site Plans
E
S
E
S
HIGHWAY 85
MARY AVE
GLENBROOK APARTMENTS
MARY AVE DOG PARK
APN 326-27-037
APN 326-27-030
APN 326-27-053
38
.
0
'
7.0'
PSE TO
REMAIN
7.
0
'
PS
E
T
O
RE
M
A
I
N
56
.
0
'
N73°14'26"E
30.04'
N73°14'26"E
28.22'
R =1014.00'
∆=6°5 9 '4 9 "
L=12 3.8 3 '
R =3 0 0 0.0 0 '
∆=5 °15 '3 5 "
L =2 7 5.4 0 '
N16°25'54"W 647.26'
N16°25'54"W 586.54'
CALTRANS ROW
PL
CL
EXISTING PARKING STALL
TO BE DEMOLISHED (TYP.)
EXISTING PARKING STALL
TO BE DEMOLISHED (TYP.)
EXISTING PARKING STALL
TO BE DEMOLISHED (TYP.)
EXISTING TRAFFIC STRIPING
TO BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING TRAFFIC STRIPING
TO BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING TRAFFIC STRIPING
TO BE DEMOLISHED
PROTECT IN PLACE
EXISTING PARKING STALL
EXISTING CONCRETE
TO BE DEMOLISHED EXISTING CONCRETE
TO BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING CONCRETE
TO REMAIN
EXISTING CONCRETE
TO REMAIN
EXISTING ASPHALT
TO REMAIN
EXISTING ASPHALT
TO REMAIN
EXISTING CURB STOP TO
BE DEMOLISHED (TYP.)
EXISTING CURB STOP TO
BE DEMOLISHED (TYP.)
EXISTING CURB STOP TO
BE DEMOLISHED (TYP.)EXISTING CURB TO
BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING CURB TO
BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING TRAFFIC STRIPING
TO BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING ASPHALT
TO BE DEMOLISHEDEXISTING FIBER
OPTIC BOX TO
REMAIN
EXISTING FENCE
TO REMAIN
EXISTING ELEC. LINES
TO BE RELOCATED
EXISTING SOUNDWALL
TO REMAIN
EXISTING ELEC.
MANHOLE TO REMAIN
APPROXIMATE LOCATION
OF EXISTING WATER LINE
EXISTING SLIDING
GATE TO REMAIN
EXISTING 10" VCP
SS TO REMAIN
EXISTING 10" VCP
SS TO REMAIN
EXISTING AT&T FIBER
OPTIC LINES TO REMAIN
(LOCATION APPROXIMATE)
EXISTING CITY OF
CUPERTINO FIBER OPTIC
LINES TO BE RELOCATED
EXISTING STREET LIGHT
TO REMAIN (TYP.)
HIGHWAY 85
MARY AVE
APN 326-27-053
ARROYO VILLAGE
APN 326-27-042
38
.
0
'
56
.
0
'
N73°34'06"E
17.84'
N73°32'03"E
28.37'R =514.00'∆=10°12'26"
L=91.57'
CALTRANS ROW
PL
CL
EXISTING PARKING STALL
TO BE DEMOLISHED (TYP.)
EXISTING PARKING STALL
TO BE DEMOLISHED (TYP.)
EXISTING PARKING STALL
TO BE DEMOLISHED (TYP.)
EXISTING PARKING STALL
TO BE DEMOLISHED (TYP.)
EXISTING TRAFFIC STRIPING
TO BE DEMOLISHED EXISTING TRAFFIC STRIPING
TO BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING TRAFFIC STRIPING
TO BE DEMOLISHED EXISTING PARKING STALL
TO REMAIN
EXISTING CURB TO
REMAIN
EXISTING CURB
STOP TO REMAIN EXISTING CONCRETE
TO REMAIN
EXISTING CONCRETE
TO BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING CONCRETE
TO BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING CONCRETE
TO REMAINEXISTING CONCRETE
TO REMAIN EXISTING ASPHALT
TO REMAIN
EXISTING ASPHALT
TO REMAIN
EXISTING CURB STOP TO
BE DEMOLISHED (TYP.)EXISTING CURB STOP TO
BE DEMOLISHED (TYP.)
EXISTING CURB STOP TO
BE DEMOLISHED (TYP.)
EXISTING CURB STOP TO
EXISTING CURB TO
BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING CURB TO
BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING PARKING STALL
TO BE DEMOLISHED (TYP.)
EXISTING SIGN TO
BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING WALL TO
BE DEMOLISHED EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURE
TO BE DEMOLISHED
EXISTING TRAFFIC
STRIPING TO REMAIN
EXISTING MAINTENANCE
BLDG TO REMAIN
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
EXISTING 12" SAN JOSE
WATER COMPANY WATER LINE
EXISTING SLIDING
GATE TO REMAIN
EXISTING STREET LIGHT
TO REMAIN (TYP.)
EXISTING FIRE
HYDRANT TO REMAIN
N73°38'11"E
14.23'
E
S
D
Ko Architects, Inc.
900 High Street, Suite 1
Palo Alto, CA 94301
p: 650.853.1908
MARY AVENUE
AFFORDABLE
HOUSING
CITY OF
CUPERTINO
MARY AVENUE
CUPERTINO, CA
PRELIMINA
R
Y
,
NOT FOR
CONSTRUC
T
I
O
N
NO
R
T
H
EXISTING
CONDITIONS &
DEMO PLAN
C000.0
DEMOLITION NOTES:
1.CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR THE SITE WITHIN THE DEMOLITION LIMITS, THE CONTRACTOR
SHALL DEMOLISH AND REMOVE FROM THE SITE ALL CURB, SIDEWALK, PAVEMENT,
PLANTERS AND TREE ROOTS. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL UTILITIES AND
APPURTENANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
2.ALL MATERIAL REMOVED FROM THIS SITE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR
IN A LEGAL MANNER.
3.REMOVAL OF LANDSCAPING SHALL INCLUDE ROOTS AND ORGANIC MATERIAL.
4.DUST CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE USED DURING DEMOLITION. CONTRACTOR SHALL
PROVIDE A DUST CONTROL AND MITIGATION MEASURES PLAN.
5.CONTRACTOR TO CAP ALL EXISTING WET UTILITIES AT LIMIT OF DEMOLITION UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED. SEWER LATERALS SHALL BE CAPPED AT THE MAIN. WATER
LATERALS SHALL BE REMOVED BACK TO EXISTING METER BOXES.
6.CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST THE GRADE OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES TO REMAIN.
7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE DEMOLITION PLAN, TREE PROTECTION PLAN
AND ARBORIST REPORT FOR THE DEMOLITION/PRESERVATION OF EXISTING TREES. ALL
TREES NOT SPECIFICALLY SHOWN TO BE PRESERVED OR RELOCATED WITHIN THE
LIMITS OF DEMOLITION SHALL BE REMOVED AS PART OF THIS CONTRACT. TREE
PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AS NECESSARY PRIOR TO ANY
DEMOLITION.
8.REFER TO THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS OF EXISTING
STRUCTURES, ETC., LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED,
ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS MARKED AS "REMOVE" INCLUDING UTILITIES, BUILDINGS,
STRUCTURES, SLABS, CONCRETE, ASPHALT, DEBRIS PILES, SIGNS, AND ALL
APPURTENANCES ARE TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND
PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER AS PART OF THIS CONTRACT. SOME
ITEMS TO BE REMOVED MAY NOT BE DEPICTED ON THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, SUCH
AS UNDERGROUND UTILITIES THAT TIE ABOVEGROUND UTILITY STRUCTURES MARKED
AS "REMOVE". REFER TO THE DEMOLITION PLAN FOR THE LIMITS OF REMOVAL OF
EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO VISIT THE SITE
AND DETERMINE THE FULL EXTENT OF THE ITEMS TO BE REMOVED. CONTRACTOR
SHALL VERIFY THAT ALL IMPROVEMENTS BEING REMOVED ARE FULLY CONTAINED
WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DEMOLITION, AND THAT THEY DO NOT SERVE ANY FUNCTION FOR
IMPROVEMENTS BEYOND LIMITS OF DEMOLITION. IF ANY ITEMS ARE IN QUESTION, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER PRIOR TO REMOVAL OF SAID ITEMS.
9.THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS APPROXIMATE AND MAY OR MAY NOT BE
INCLUSIVE FOR THIS SITE. ANY UTILITIES ENCOUNTERED DURING DEMOLITION THAT
ARE NOT DELINEATED HEREON SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE
OWNER AND PROJECT ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.
10.EXISTING FENCING MAY BE USED AS CONSTRUCTION FENCING ONLY IF APPROVED BY
THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A SPECIFIC LAYOUT FOR
CONSIDERATION BY THE ENGINEER. IF APPROVED, CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONDITION OF ANY SUCH FENCE SEGMENT POST
CONSTRUCTION.
11.RELOCATION OR REMOVAL OF ELECTRICAL AND GAS UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED
WITH PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY.
12.DEMOLITION OF SITE ELEMENTS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, BUILDINGS, LIGHT
POLES, AND BOLLARDS SHALL INCLUDE THE REMOVAL, AND BACKFILL, OF ASSOCIATED
FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS.
13.LIMIT OF SITE DEMOLITION SHALL NOT EXTEND OUTSIDE THE EXISTING R/W AND
PROPERTY LIMITS.
14.APPLICANT/CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY FOR AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR STREET
TREE REMOVAL. PRIOR TO REMOVAL, THE OWNER AND/OR THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
POST A TREE REMOVAL NOTICE FOR A MINIMUM TWO WEEKS PRIOR TO REMOVAL.
DOCUMENT AND PROVIDE PROOF OF NOTICING TO THE CITY, SUCH AS TIME STAMPED
PHOTOS OF THE NOTICE POSTED TO THE TREES AT THE BEGINNING AND THE END OF
TWO WEEK NOTICING PERIOD.
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE/ CALTRANS ROW
CENTERLINE
EASEMENT
APPROXIMATE CIVIL LIMIT OF WORK
EXISTING ASPHALT TO REMAIN
EXISTING ASPHALT TO BE DEMOLISHED
SE
E
B
E
L
O
W
F
O
R
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
A
T
I
O
N
SE
E
A
B
O
V
E
F
O
R
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
A
T
I
O
N
SURVEY NOTES:
BASIS OF BEARING:
THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED UPON
THE CENTERLINE OF MARY AVENUE, BEING
N89°11'55"W PER PARCEL MAP RECORDED IN BOOK
838 OF MAPS, PAGES 24 & 25, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER.
BENCHMARK:
NORTHING: 1943739
EASTING: 6110141
ELEVATION: 326.97
BM1071 SCVWD BRASS DISK (R180); ON TOP OF THE
SOUTHERLY CURB OF STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
AT APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET WESTERLY OF
PENINSULA/BUBB ROAD AND NEAR RAILROAD
CROSSING POLE #22118. ALSO, 2.5 FEET NORTH OF
THE RAILROAD CROSSING LIGHTS, AND 20 FEET
WEST FROM THE CENTER OF THE TRACKS. CITY OF
CUPERTINO.
SURVEY DATE: AUGUST 02, 2024
E
S
STOP
NO
PA
R
K
I
N
G
ON
L
Y
HIGHWAY 85
MARY AVE
GLENBROOK APARTMENTS
MARY AVE DOG PARK
APN 326-27-037
APN 326-27-030
APN 326-27-053
EX
7.0'
PUE
CALTRANS ROW
PL
CL
56
.
0
'
38
.
1
'
8.
5
'
(T
Y
P
.
)
18.0'
(TYP.)
3.0'
7.4'4.
0
'
ROW
8.1'
SIDEWALK
4.
0
'
4.
0
'
SI
D
E
W
A
L
K
S8°12'59"E
15.15'
R=21.0'R=21.0'
R=25.0'
BUILDING 2A BUILDING 2B
EX
7
.
0
'
PU
E
7.
1
'
10
.
3
'
4.
1
'
39.9'
BLDG 2 ELEVATOR
18
.
9
'
6.
6
'
4.
5
'
5.
0
'
2.
5
'
8.
0
'
11
.
0
'
11
.
0
'
2.
0
'
5.
0
'
7.
0
'
24.0'
STORMWATER
BIORETENTION
PLANTER
ABOVE GROUND
TRANSFORMER PAD
R=15.0 '
R =20.0'
13
.
0
'
6.
2
'
END SIDEWALK
STOP
NO
PA
R
K
I
N
G
ON
L
Y
HIGHWAY 85
MARY AVE
APN 326-27-053
ARROYO VILLAGE
APN 326-27-042
CALTRANS ROW
CL
56
.
0
'
ROW
4.
0
'
8.1'
SIDEWALK
4.
5
'
4.
0
'
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
BUILDING 1A BUILDING 1B
18.0'
(TYP.)
8.
5
'
4.0' SIDEWALK
7.
1
'
7.
1
'
4.
1
'
38
.
1
'
18
.
9
'
6.
5
'
9.6'9.
0
'
8.
0
'
24.0'
PL
BLDG 1 ELEVATOR
4.
0
'
65.0'
R =3 0.0'
R=42.0 '
13
.
0
'
6.
2
'
Ko Architects, Inc.
900 High Street, Suite 1
Palo Alto, CA 94301
p: 650.853.1908
MARY AVENUE
AFFORDABLE
HOUSING
CITY OF
CUPERTINO
MARY AVENUE
CUPERTINO, CA
PRELIMINA
R
Y
,
NOT FOR
CONSTRUC
T
I
O
N
PRELIMINARY SITE
PLAN C001.0
NO
R
T
H
LEGEND
SE
E
B
E
L
O
W
F
O
R
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
A
T
I
O
N
SE
E
A
B
O
V
E
F
O
R
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
A
T
I
O
N
PROPERTY LINE/ CALTRANS ROW
CENTERLINE
EASEMENT
SAWCUT LINE
LEGEND